Edgar Filing: ENVESTNET, INC.

Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part IV

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K


ý		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the year ended December 31, 2014
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 001-34835

Envestnet, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		20-1409613 (I.R.S Employer Identification No.)
35 East Wacker Drive, Suite 2400, Chicago, IL (Address of principal executive offices)		60601 (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
(312) 827-2800

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class:		Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered:

Common stock, par value $0.005 per share		NYSE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer ý		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ý

Aggregate market value of registrant's common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing price of a share of the registrant's common stock on June 30, 2014 as reported on The New York Stock Exchange on that date: $1,088,337,378. For purposes of this calculation, shares of common stock held by (i) persons holding more than 5% of the outstanding shares of stock, and (ii) officers and directors of the registrant, as of June 30, 2014, are excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination is not necessarily conclusive of affiliate status.

As of February 20, 2015, 34,547,210 shares of the common stock with a par value of $0.005 per share were outstanding.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS



	PART I
Forward-Looking Statements		3
Item 1.	Business	4
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	19
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	34
Item 2.	Properties	34
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	34
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	34
	PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	35
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	37
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	38
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	63
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	64
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	106
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	106
Item 9B.	Other Information	111
	PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	111
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	111
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	111
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	111
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	112
	PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	113
SIGNATURES		118

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

Unless the context requires otherwise, the words "Envestnet," "the Company," "we," "us" and "our" are references to Envestnet, Inc. and its subsidiaries as a whole.

This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." These statements are based on our current expectations and projections about future events and are identified by terminology such as "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "expected," "intend," "will," "may," or "should" or the negative of those terms or variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our business and other characteristics of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may include, among others, statements relating to:

•: difficulty in sustaining rapid revenue growth, which may place significant demands on the Company's administrative, operational and financial resources,
•: fluctuations in the Company's revenue,
•: the concentration of nearly all of the Company's revenues from the delivery of investment solutions and services to clients in the financial advisory industry,
•: the impact of market and economic conditions on the Company's revenues,
•: the Company's reliance on a limited number of clients for a material portion of its revenue,
•: the renegotiation of fee percentages or termination of the Company's services by its clients,
•: the Company's ability to identify potential acquisition candidates, complete acquisitions and successfully integrate acquired companies,
•: compliance failures,
•: regulatory actions against the Company,
•: the failure to protect the Company's intellectual property rights,
•: the Company's inability to successfully execute the conversion of its clients' assets from their technology platform to the Company's technology platforms in a timely and accurate manner,
•: general economic conditions, political and regulatory conditions,
•: the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on our business,
•: market conditions and our ability to issue additional debt and equity, and
•: management's response to these factors.

In addition, there may be other factors of which we are presently unaware or that we currently deem immaterial that could cause our actual results to be materially different from the results referenced in the forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements contained in this annual report and documents incorporated herein by reference are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not intend to update or otherwise revise the forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this annual report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by applicable law. If we do update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be made that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements.

Table of Contents

Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations are reasonable, we may not achieve our plans, intentions or expectations.

These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements we make in this annual report are set forth in Part I under "Risk Factors"; accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance upon our forward-looking statements.

You should read this annual report on Form 10-K completely and with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and achievements may be different from what we expect and that these differences may be material. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

The following discussion and analysis should also be read along with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this annual report. Except for the historical information contained herein, this discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those discussed below.

Except where we have otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, dollar amounts presented in this Form 10-K are in thousands, except for Item 9, Exhibits and per share amounts.

Item 1. Business

General

We are a leading provider of unified wealth management software and services to financial advisors and institutions. By integrating a wide range of investment solutions and services, our technology platforms provide financial advisors with the flexibility to address their clients' needs. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 40,000 advisors used our technology platforms, supporting approximately $713 billion of assets in approximately 2.9 million investor accounts.

Envestnet empowers financial advisors to deliver fee-based advice to their clients. We work with both Independent Registered Investment Advisors ("RIAs"), as well as advisors associated with financial institutions such as broker-dealers and banks. The services we offer and market to financial advisors address advisors' ability to grow their practice as well as to operate more efficiently—the Envestnet platforms span the various elements of the wealth management process, from the initial meeting an advisor has with a prospective client to the ongoing day-to-day operations of managing an advisory practice.

Our centrally-hosted technology platforms, which we refer to as having "open architecture" because of their flexibility, provides financial advisors with access to a series of integrated services to help them better serve their clients. These services include risk assessment and selection of investment strategies and solutions, asset allocation models, research and due diligence, portfolio construction, proposal generation and paperwork preparation, model management and account rebalancing, account monitoring, customized fee billing, overlay services covering asset allocation, tax management and socially responsible investing, aggregated multi-custodian performance reporting and communication tools, as well as access to a wide range of leading third-party asset custodians.

We offer these solutions principally through the following product and services suites:

•: Envestnet's wealth management software empowers advisors to better manage client outcomes and strengthen their practice. Our software unifies the applications and services advisors use to manage their practice and advise their clients, including financial planning; capital markets assumptions; asset allocation guidance; research and due diligence on investment managers and funds; portfolio management, trading and rebalancing; multi-custodial, aggregated performance reporting; and billing calculation and administration.

Table of Contents

•: Envestnet | PMC®, our Portfolio Management Consultants group primarily engages in consulting services aimed at providing financial advisors with additional support in addressing their clients' needs, as well as the creation of proprietary investment solutions and products. Envestnet | PMC's investment solutions and products include managed account and multi-manager portfolios, mutual fund portfolios and Exchange Traded Fund ("ETF") portfolios. Envestnet | PMC also offers Prima Premium Research, comprising institutional-quality research and due diligence on investment managers, mutual funds, ETFs and liquid alternatives funds.
•: Envestnet | Tamarac^TM provides leading portfolio accounting, rebalancing, trading, performance reporting and client relationship management ("CRM") software, principally to high-end RIAs.
•: Vantage Reporting Solution^TM software aggregates and manages investment data, provides performance reporting and benchmarking, giving advisors an in-depth view of clients' various investments, empowering advisors to give holistic, personalized advice and consulting.
•: Envestnet | WMS^TM offers financial institutions access to an integrated wealth platform, which helps construct and manage sophisticated portfolio solutions across an entire account life cycle, particularly in the area of unified managed account ("UMA") trading. Envestnet | WMS's Overlay Portfolio Management console helps wealth managers efficiently build customized client portfolios that consider both proprietary and open-architecture investment solutions.
•: Envestnet | Placemark^TM develops UMA programs and other portfolio management outsourcing solutions, including patented portfolio overlay and tax optimization services, for banks, full service broker-dealers and RIA firms.

We believe that our business model results in a high degree of recurring and predictable financial results. The majority of our revenue is asset-based, meaning it is derived from fees charged as a percentage of the assets that are managed or administered on our technology platforms by financial advisors. We also generate revenues from recurring, contractual licensing fees for providing access to our technology platforms and from professional services.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, we earned fees of $294,200 from assets under management ("AUM") or assets under administration ("AUA" and collectively "AUM/A"), representing a 47% increase over earned fees from AUM/A in 2013. Asset-based fees accounted for approximately 84%, 83% and 81% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2014, licensing and professional services revenues were $54,500, representing a 30% increase over licensing and professional services revenues in 2013.

Licensing and professional services revenues accounted for 16%, 17% and 19% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

For over 85% of our asset-based fee arrangements, we bill customers at the beginning of each quarter based on the market value of customer assets on our technology platforms as of the end of the prior quarter, providing for a high degree of revenue visibility in the current quarter while inherently revenue from quarter to quarter may fluctuate based on changes in asset values or fee rates on those asset values. Furthermore, our licensing fees are highly predictable because they are generally established in multi-year contracts providing longer-term visibility regarding that portion of our total revenues.

As the tables below indicate, our business has experienced steady and significant growth over the last several years. We believe this growth is attributable to secular trends in the wealth management industry as described below, the uniqueness and comprehensiveness of our products, as well as acquisitions.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the AUM or AUA as of the end of the quarters indicated:

Assets Under Management or Administration
($ in billions)

The following table sets forth the number of accounts with AUM or AUA as of the end of the quarters indicated:

Accounts Under Management or Administration
(in thousands)

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth as of the end of the years indicated the number of financial advisors that had client accounts on our technology platforms:

Total Advisors

We were founded in 1999 and through organic growth and strategic transactions we have grown to become a leading independent provider of integrated wealth management software and services to financial advisors and institutions. Our headquarters are located in Chicago, Illinois and we have offices in New York, New York; Denver, Colorado; Seattle, Washington; Sunnyvale, California; Boston and Wellesley, Massachusetts; Landis and Raleigh, North Carolina; Addison, Texas and Trivandrum, India.

Our Market Opportunity

In addition to experiencing significant growth in financial assets, the wealth management industry is characterized by a number of important trends, including those described below, which we believe create a significant market opportunity for technology-enabled investment solutions and services like ours.

Increase in independent financial advisors. Based on industry news reports and channel shifts in the advisor population, we believe that over the past several years an increasing number of financial advisors have elected to leave large financial institutions and start their own financial advisory practices or move to smaller, more independent firms. According to an analysis done by Cerulli Associates, the number of RIAs and dually-registered advisors has grown 26% over the past five years from 42,000 in 2008 to 53,000 in 2013.

Increased reliance on technology among independent financial advisors. In order to compete effectively in the marketplace, independent financial advisors are increasingly relying on technology service providers to help them provide comparable services cost effectively and efficiently.

Increased use of financial advisors. We believe that the volatility and increasing complexity in securities markets have resulted in increased investor interest in receiving professional financial advisory services. In a 2014 survey of US households by Phoenix Marketing International, 35% of households responded that they needed more financial and investment advice than they have in the past, up from 29% who expressed such need in 2009.

Table of Contents

Increased use of fee-based investment solutions. Based on our industry experience, we believe that in order for financial advisors to effectively manage their clients' assets, advisors are seeking account types that offer the flexibility to choose among the widest range of investment solutions. Financial advisors typically charge their fees for these types of flexible accounts based on a percentage of assets rather than on a commission or other basis. We estimate, based on an analysis done by Cerulli Associates, fee-based investment advisory assets totaled $7 trillion in 2014 based on Q3 2014 managed account assets of $3.9 trillion and estimated RIA and dually-registered advisor assets of $3.1 trillion.

More stringent standards applicable to financial advisors. Increased scrutiny of financial advisors to ensure compliance with current laws, coupled with the possibility of new laws focused on a fiduciary standard, may require changes to the way financial advisors offer advice. In order to adapt to these changes, we believe that financial advisors may benefit from utilizing technology platforms, such as ours, that allows them to address their clients' wealth management needs.

Our Business Model

We believe that a number of attractive characteristics contribute significantly to the success of our business model, including:

•: Positioned to capitalize on favorable industry trends. As a leading provider of unified wealth management software and services to financial advisors, we believe we are well positioned to take advantage of favorable secular trends in the wealth management industry, particularly the increased prevalence and use of independent financial advisors, the movement toward fee-based pricing structures and advisors' increased reliance on technology.
•: Recurring and resilient revenue base. The substantial majority of our revenues is recurring and derived either from asset-based fees, which generally are billed at the beginning of each quarter or from fixed fees under multi-year license agreements. For the year ended December 31, 2014, we derived 84% of our total revenues from asset-based fees and 16% from licensing and professional services revenues.
•: Strong customer retention. We believe that the breadth of access to investment solutions and the multitude of services that we provide allow financial advisors to address a wide range of their clients' needs and, as a result, financial advisors are less likely to move away from our technology platforms. Because a technology platform is involved in nearly all of a financial advisor's activities needed to serve their clients, once a financial advisor has moved clients and their assets onto our technology platforms, significant time, costs and/or resources would be required for the financial advisor to shift to another technology platform.
•: Substantial operating leverage. Because we have designed our systems architecture to accommodate growth in the number of advisors and accounts we support and to provide the flexibility to add new investment solutions and services, our technology platforms and infrastructure allow us to grow our business efficiently, without the need for significant additional expenditures as assets grow. This, combined with low marginal costs required to add additional accounts and new investment solutions and services, enables us to generate substantial operating leverage during the course of our relationship with a financial advisor as the advisor adds accounts to our platforms and the assets of the advisor's clients grow through financial advisors' use of additional investment solutions and services we provide.

Table of Contents

Our Growth Strategy

Envestnet serves the fastest growing segments of the wealth management industry: independent financial advisors; fee-based solutions; and outsourced investment and technology solutions. We intend to increase revenue and profitability by continuing to pursue the following strategies:

•

Increase the advisor base. Through the outreach and marketing activities of our sales and client service teams, we continue the process of leveraging existing enterprise client relationships to add new financial advisors to our technology platforms, and building new relationships to add additional advisors. Generally, when we establish an enterprise client relationship, we are provided access to the client's financial advisors and are given the opportunity to convert them to our technology platforms. During the five-year period ended December 31, 2014, within existing enterprises, we increased the number of advisors with AUM or AUA on our platforms at a compound annual growth rate of 12%. We further increased the number of advisors through acquisitions and new enterprise relationships established during the past five years, resulting in the total number of advisors with AUM or AUA on our platforms growing at a compound annual growth rate of 28%. Even with that steady growth, we continue to have the opportunity to increase the number of financial advisors we serve within our existing enterprise client relationships as advisors increasingly shift their businesses to fee-based practices.

•

Extend the account base within a given advisor relationship. We work with existing clients to shift an increasing portion of their business to the Envestnet platforms. During the five-year period ended December 31, 2014, the average number of AUM or AUA accounts per advisor on our technology platforms grew from approximately 21 to 34, an increase of over 64%. As a result, total AUM or AUA accounts increased at a compound annual growth rate of 41% during the same period.

•

Expand the services utilized by each advisor. In most cases, an advisor will use only a portion of Envestnet's services. Accordingly, through our sales and marketing efforts, we will continue to educate our financial advisor customers regarding our capabilities in order to expand the scope of our investment solutions and services they employ.

•

Obtain new enterprise clients. Growing fee-based offerings has become a strategic priority for financial services firms. Envestnet is positioned in the marketplace to empower these firms to deliver fee-based solutions to their advisors. These enterprise clients provide us with access to a large number of financial advisors that may be interested in utilizing our technology platforms, as well as to the assets that are managed by these financial advisors. We believe that the current market opportunity for enterprise conversions continues to be significant. New enterprise clients also provide further opportunities to execute on the other strategies discussed above.

•

Continue to invest in our technology platforms. We intend to continue to invest in our technology platforms to provide financial advisors with access to investment solutions and services that address the widest range of financial advisors' front-, middle-and back-office needs. In the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, our technology development costs totaled $11,560, $9,141, and $8,659, respectively.

•

Continue to pursue strategic transactions and other relationships. We intend to continue to selectively pursue acquisitions, investments and other relationships that we believe can enhance the attractiveness of our technology platforms or expand our client base. Given our scale of operations and record of past transactions and access to capital, we believe we are well-positioned to engage in such transactions in the future. During the past three years we have acquired the following entities:

•: In April 2012, we acquired Prima Capital Holding, Inc. ("Prima"). Prima, now part of Envestnet | PMC, provides Prima Premium Research, including investment manager due diligence, consulting, and custom research to the wealth management and retirement industries. Prima's clientele includes banks, independent RIAs, regional broker-dealers, family offices and trust companies.

Table of Contents

•: In May 2012, we acquired Tamarac, Inc. ("Tamarac"). Tamarac, now operating as Envestnet | Tamarac, provides leading portfolio accounting, rebalancing, trading, performance reporting and client relationship management software, principally to high-end RIAs.
•: In July 2013, we acquired the Wealth Management Solutions ("WMS") division of Prudential Investments. WMS offers financial institutions access to an integrated wealth platform, which helps construct and manage sophisticated portfolio solutions across an entire account life cycle, particularly in the area of UMA trading.
•: In February 2014, we formed Envestnet Retirement Solutions, LLC ("ERS, LLC") with various third parties. ERS, LLC offers advisory and technology enabled services to financial advisors and retirement plans. As of December 31, 2014, our ownership in ERS, LLC was 57%.
•: In October 2014, we acquired Placemark Holdings, Inc. ("Placemark"). Placemark, now operating as Envestnet | Placemark develops UMA programs and other portfolio management outsourcing solutions, including patented portfolio overlay and tax optimization services, for banks, full-service broker-dealers and RIA firms.

Our Technology Platforms

Our proprietary Web-based platforms provide financial advisors with access to investment solutions and services that address, in one unified, centrally-hosted platform, based on our knowledge of the industry, the widest range of front-, middle-and back-office needs in our industry. The "open architecture" design of our technology platforms provide financial advisors with flexibility in terms of the investment solutions and services they access, and configurability in the manner in which the financial advisors utilize particular investment solutions and services. The multi-tenant platform architecture ensures that this level of flexibility and customization is achieved without requiring us to create unique applications for each client, thereby reducing the need for additional technology personnel and associated expenses. In addition, though our technology platforms are designed to deliver a breadth of functions, financial advisors are able to select from the various investment solutions and services we offer, without being required to subscribe to or purchase more than what they believe is necessary.

Envestnet's wealth management software enables advisors to better advise their clients, invest portfolios, manage their practice and those portfolios, and report on their clients' holdings.

Table of Contents

Advise. Our technology platforms provide financial advisors with a flexible proposal and presentation tool that is capable of creating highly customized documents, including signature-ready forms needed to open client accounts. Also, our platforms include a number of financial planning tools such as Monte Carlo simulations, portfolio diagnostics and retirement planning which enable financial advisors to create and implement financial plans that are tailored to each client's investment goals, risk tolerance and assets. Our technology platforms provide financial advisors with a customizable risk tolerance questionnaire, which assists advisors in understanding the investment objectives and preferences of their clients and also helps the advisor comply with applicable regulatory requirements regarding the suitability of investments and fiduciary obligations. Based on answers to the questionnaire, the advisor can analyze whether the current portfolio is appropriate to reach the client's goals and suggest an investment policy. We also empower advisors to improve their research and advice through the institutional quality research we provide on investment managers, funds, and alternative investments, and asset allocation guidance through Envestnet | PMC and Prima Premium Research.

Invest. Once the investment solutions have been selected, our technology platforms, through relationships we have established with a variety of investment managers, allow the financial advisor to access and choose from a wide range of investment programs, including separately managed accounts, unified managed accounts, third-party strategist programs, mutual fund and ETF programs, and others, depending on the financial advisor's assessment of the client's needs. Because our technology platforms support nearly every investment program type that is currently available, financial advisors are able to keep more of a client's assets on one technology platform, thereby simplifying the operation of their practice, saving time and lowering costs. Envestnet | PMC provides consulting services aimed at providing financial advisors with additional support in addressing their clients' needs, including asset allocation modeling, asset manager and mutual fund due diligence, manager and fund selection and ongoing monitoring, investment portfolio construction and overlay services, principally relating to ongoing portfolio management and asset allocation rebalancing. Envestnet | PMC also creates proprietary investment solutions and products, including separate account strategies, multi-manager portfolios, mutual funds, mutual fund wrap and ETF asset allocation strategies.

Table of Contents

Manage. Once a financial advisor has created a client account and selected investment solutions and programs, our technology platforms provide access to ongoing account management services. Additionally, Envestnet | PMC portfolio managers and research analysts review all Envestnet | PMC models and proprietary portfolios to determine when to rebalance across asset classes. We also offer overlay services that can help enhance an advisor's ability to carry out his or her fiduciary responsibility. Financial advisors can receive risk and style drift alerts, enabling them to adjust their clients' portfolios to ensure that the portfolios remain in compliance with their clients' stated investment objectives and risk tolerance levels. These services include ongoing review of investment portfolios for compliance with asset allocation criteria, with rebalancing recommendations made as necessary, assistance with investment portfolio tax management and review of investment accounts to ensure that investment decisions are consistent with the client's investment objectives. We also offer a socially responsible overlay which the financial advisor may use to maintain compliance with clients' investment restrictions. These may include securities issued by specific companies or from issuers in certain industries that clients want to exclude from their investment accounts.

Envestnet | Tamarac Advisor Xi integrates portfolio accounting, model management, monitoring, rebalancing, trading, performance reporting, and enterprise-level client relationship management software. Advisor Xi also empowers advisors to receive drift alerts and rebalancing notifications to help ensure that asset allocations conform to a client's investment policy. Envestnet | Tamarac's rebalancing software also can be configured to rebalance assets in the most tax-efficient manner for the client.

Report. Our technology platforms help advisors to better report on their clients' consolidated holdings through our Vantage Reporting Solution and Envestnet | Tamarac offerings, which provide trade-ready, fully-reconciled aggregated performance reports to advisors and their end clients. Our technology platforms provide financial advisors with access to more than 40 third-party custodians, real-time data and Web-based service tools. Our platforms generate highly configurable aggregated reports showing holdings, investment performance, capital gains and losses and other information for financial advisors to provide to their clients that can be downloaded, viewed online or printed. In addition, through our India operations, our technology platforms provide financial advisors with access to client account data reconciled daily with records maintained by multiple custodians. Accordingly, when securities markets open each day, financial advisors have the most up-to-date account data available. Our technology platforms also support a wide range of fee and billing structures. These include breakpoint pricing, where lower fee rates are applied as asset levels meet or exceed pre-established thresholds, fees based on aggregated client funds across several accounts held by family members, fees tailored to different investment programs and investment solution types and other customized fee and billing arrangements. Our technology platforms include configurable Fiduciary Oversight Notes ("FONs") that help advisors understand implications of the decisions they make via educational text boxes, and then memorialize those decisions for client service and reporting. The FONs may be searched and reviewed by home offices or the advisors themselves.

Our Customers

Independent financial advisors that are working alone or as part of financial advisory firms. Our principal value proposition aimed at independent financial advisors working alone or as part of financial advisory firms is that our technology platforms allow them to compete effectively with financial advisors employed by large financial institutions. We provide independent financial advisors with access to as many or more of the investment solutions and services that are typically available to financial advisors working at the largest firms. An example of one of our independent financial advisory firm clients is Commonwealth Financial Network.

Enterprise clients. We provide enterprise clients with customized, private-labeled technology platforms that enable them to support their affiliated financial advisors with a broad range of investment solutions and services. Our contracts with enterprise clients establish the applicable terms

Table of Contents

and conditions, including pricing terms, service level agreements and basic platform configurations. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, revenues associated with our relationship with our single largest enterprise client, FMR LLC, an affiliate of FMR Corp., or Fidelity, accounted for 19%, 20%, and 22%, respectively, of our total revenues. No other client accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues. Examples of our other enterprise clients include Northwestern Mutual, National Financial Partners and National Planning Holdings.

Sales and Marketing

Our sales and marketing staff of approximately 177 employees is organized by sales channel and product offering. Our enterprise sales team focuses on entering into agreements with enterprise clients, which enable us to sell our platform capabilities to those firms and the advisors associated with them. Our advisory sales team sells to the individual financial advisors of broker-dealers and enters into agreements with RIA firms. Envestnet | Tamarac sells rebalancing, performance reporting and CRM solutions principally to large RIA firms. Envestnet | PMC offers portfolio and investment management consulting services, including Prima Premium Research and due diligence capabilities. Envestnet | WMS offers financial institutions access to an integrated wealth platform, particularly in the area of UMA trading. Envestnet | Placemark is a leading provider of active overlay portfolio management solutions for UMA programs for banks, full-service broker-dealers and RIA firms.

The principal aim of our marketing efforts is to create greater visibility of our company and our brands, and to provide thought leadership to the wealth management industry. Our marketing efforts are focused on our core markets: financial advisors and enterprise clients. We use advertising and public relations to communicate our message to these target markets. Examples of these marketing efforts include:

•: quotes in wealth management industry publications regarding our views on financial advisor trends and challenges;
•: advertising and other marketing materials promoting our investment solutions and services;
•: frequent participation in industry conferences and tradeshows, including events sponsored by our custodian partners, by sponsorship, making presentations and speaking on panels;
•: hosting conferences on wealth management solutions;
•: providing insights on industry trends through internal research and sponsoring and writing industry white papers; and
•: creating marketing tools for financial advisors to better communicate with their current and prospective clients.

To implement our marketing efforts, we generally employ paid print and online advertisements in a variety of industry publications, as well as promotions that include e-blast campaigns and sponsored webinars. We also partner with independent broker-dealers ("IBDs") on direct mail campaigns targeting such firms' financial advisors to describe the investment solutions and services that we offer, produce brochures and presentations for financial advisors to use with their clients and we create Internet pages or sites to promote our investment solutions and services.

Competition

We generally compete on the basis of several factors, including the breadth and quality of investment solutions and services to which we provide access through our technology platforms, the number of custodians that are connected through our technology platforms, the price of our investment solutions and services, the ease of use of our technology platforms and the nature and scope of investment solutions and services that each client believes are necessary to address their needs. Our

Table of Contents

competitors offer a variety of products and services that compete with one or more of the investment solutions and services provided through our technology platforms, although, based on our industry experience, we believe that none offers a more comprehensive set of products and services than we do. Our principal competitors include:

•: Turnkey Asset Management Platform Providers. Providers of turnkey asset management platforms, including SEI Investments Company, AssetMark, Inc. and Lockwood Advisors (a subsidiary of BNY Mellon Corporation), typically provide financial advisors with one or more types of products and services but generally offer fewer choices in terms of custodians, asset managers, technology features and functionality.
•: Providers of Specific Service Applications. A number of our competitors, including Advent Software, Inc., provide financial advisors with a product or service designed to address one specific issue or need, such as financial planning or performance reporting. While our technology platforms also provide access to these investment solutions or services, financial advisors may elect to utilize a single application rather than a fully integrated platform.
•: Custodians. A number of leading asset custodians, such as Pershing LLC (a subsidiary of BNY Mellon Corporation) and The Charles Schwab Corporation, have expanded beyond their custodial businesses to also offer advisor trading tools that compete with our financial advisor-directed solutions.

Technology

Our technology platforms feature a three-tier architecture integrating a Web-based user interface, an application tier that houses the business logic for all of the platforms' functionality and a SQL Server databases. The application tier resides behind load balancers which distribute the workload demands across our servers. We believe our technology design allows for significant scalability.

We devote significant resources to ensuring sufficient platform capacity and system uptime. In 2014, our actual uptime was 99.8%. We have achieved Service Organization Control Report ("SOC1") compliance with our platforms and we maintain multiple redundancies, back up our databases and safeguard technologies and proprietary information consistent with industry best practices. We also maintain a comprehensive business continuity plan and company-wide risk assessment program that is consistent with industry best practices and that complies with applicable regulatory requirements.

We have historically made significant investments in platform development in order to enhance and expand our technology platforms and expect to continue to make significant investments in the future. In the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, we incurred technology development costs totaling approximately $11,560, $9,141 and $8,659, respectively. Of these costs, we capitalized approximately $3,382, $3,143 and $2,350, respectively, as internally developed software. The increase in the amount of technology development expenditures and the increase in the amount we capitalized in 2013 compared to 2012 is a result of technology development expenditures related to Envestnet | Tamarac and Envestnet | WMS products. We expect to continue focusing our technology development efforts principally on adding features to increase our market competitiveness, enhancements to improve operating efficiency and reduce risk, and client-driven requests for new capabilities.

Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights

We rely on a combination of trademark, copyright and trade secret protection laws to protect our proprietary technology and our intellectual property. We seek to control access to and distribution of our proprietary information. We enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, customers and vendors that generally provide that any confidential or proprietary information

Table of Contents

developed by us or on our behalf be kept confidential. In the normal course of business, we provide our intellectual property to third parties through licensing or restricted use agreements. We have proprietary know-how in algorithms, implementation and business on-boarding functions, along with a wide variety of applications software. We have registered the mark "ENVESTNET" with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in addition to several marks commonly used by Envestnet. We also pursue the registration of certain of our other trademarks and service marks in the United States. In addition, we have registered our domain name, www.envestnet.com and several other websites, such as www.envestnetpmc.com, www.placemark.com, www.tamaracinc.com and www.primacapital.com. We have established a system of security measures to protect our computer systems from security breaches and computer viruses. We have employed various technology and process-based methods, such as clustered and multi-level firewalls, intrusion detection mechanisms, vulnerability assessments, content filtering, antivirus software and access control mechanisms. We also use encryption techniques for data transmissions. We control and limit access to confidential and proprietary information on a "need to know" basis.

Regulation

Overview

The financial services industry is among the most extensively regulated industries in the United States. We operate investment advisory, broker-dealer and mutual fund advisory businesses, each of which is subject to a specific regulatory scheme, including regulation at the federal and state level, as well as regulation by self-regulatory organizations and non-U.S. regulatory authorities. In addition, we are subject to numerous laws and regulations of general application.

Our subsidiaries Envestnet Asset Management, Inc., Portfolio Management Consultants, Inc., ERS, LLC. and EPS operate investment advisory businesses. These subsidiaries are registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") as "investment advisers" under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"), and are regulated thereunder. They may also provide fiduciary services as defined in Section 3(21)(A)(ii) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), including acting as an "investment manager" (as defined in Section 3(38) of ERISA). As described further below, many of our investment advisory programs are conducted pursuant to the non-exclusive safe harbor from the definition of an "investment company" provided for under Rule 3a-4 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). If Rule 3a-4 were to cease to be available, or if the SEC were to modify the rule or its interpretation of how the rule is applied, it could have a substantial effect on our business. Envestnet Asset Management, Inc. serves as the investment adviser to two mutual funds and a series of collective investment trusts managed towards retirement target dates. Mutual funds are registered as "investment companies" under the Investment Company Act. The Advisers Act, Investment Company Act and ERISA, together with related regulations and interpretations of the SEC, impose numerous obligations and restrictions on investment advisers and mutual funds, including recordkeeping requirements, limitations on advertising, disclosure and reporting obligations, prohibitions on fraudulent activities, and detailed operating requirements, including restrictions on transactions between an adviser and its clients, and between a mutual fund and its advisers and affiliates. The fiduciary obligations of investment advisers to their clients require advisers to, among other things, consider the suitability of the investment products and advice they provide, seek "best execution" for their clients' securities transactions, conduct due diligence on third-party products offered to clients, consider the appropriateness of the adviser's fees, and provide extensive and ongoing disclosure to clients. The application of these requirements to wrap fee programs is particularly complex and the SEC has in the past scrutinized firms' compliance with these requirements. The SEC is authorized to institute proceedings and impose fines and sanctions for violations of the Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act and has the power to restrict or prohibit an investment adviser from carrying on its

Table of Contents

business in the event that it fails to comply with applicable laws and regulations. Although we believe we are in compliance in all material respects with the requirements of the Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act and the rules and interpretations promulgated thereunder, our failure to comply with such laws, rules and interpretations could have a material adverse effect on us. Collective investment trusts are unregistered funds operated by a trust company or a bank regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of Currency (the "OCC"). In our role as advisor to these funds, we operate under substantially similar obligations to those discussed above for mutual funds.

Portfolio Brokerage Services, Inc., ("PBS"), our broker-dealer subsidiary, is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, ("Exchange Act"), in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. In addition, PBS is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), the securities industry self-regulatory organization that supervises and regulates the conduct and activities of broker-dealers. Broker-dealers are subject to regulations that cover all aspects of their business, including sales practices, market making and trading among broker-dealers, use and safekeeping of customers' funds and securities, capital structure, record-keeping and the conduct of directors, officers, employees, representatives and associated persons. FINRA and the SEC conduct periodic examinations of the operations of its members, including PBS. Violation of applicable regulations can result in the suspension or revocation of a broker-dealer's registration, the imposition of censures or fines and the suspension or expulsion of the broker-dealer from FINRA. PBS is subject to minimum net capital requirements under the Exchange Act, SEC and FINRA rules and conducts its business pursuant to the exemption from the SEC's customer protection rule provided by Rule 15c3-3(k)(2)(i) under the Exchange Act. As of December 31, 2014, PBS was required to maintain a minimum of $100 in net capital and its actual net capital was $1,049.

Our regulated subsidiaries are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations that grant supervisory agencies, including the SEC, broad administrative powers. In the event of a failure to comply with these laws and regulations, the possible sanctions that may be imposed include the suspension of individual employees, limitations on the permissibility of our regulated subsidiaries and our other subsidiaries to engage in business for specified periods of time, censures, fines, and the revocation of registration as a broker-dealer or investment adviser, as applicable. Additionally, the securities laws and other regulations applicable to us and our subsidiaries provide for certain private rights of action that could give rise to civil litigation. Any litigation could have significant financial and non-financial consequences including monetary judgments and the requirement to take action or limit activities that could ultimately affect our business.

Additional legislation and regulations, including those relating to the activities of investment advisers and broker-dealers, changes in rules imposed by the SEC or other regulatory authorities and self-regulatory organizations, or changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules may adversely affect our business and profitability. Our businesses may be materially affected not only by regulations applicable to it as an investment adviser or broker-dealer, but also by regulations that apply to companies generally.

Investment Advisory Program Conducted Under Rule 3a-4

Under the Investment Company Act, an issuer that is engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities may be deemed an "investment company," in which case the issuer may be subject to registration requirements and regulation as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. In order to provide assurance that certain discretionary investment advisory programs would not be considered investment companies, the SEC adopted Rule 3a-4 under the Investment Company Act, which provides a non-exclusive safe harbor from the definition of an investment company for programs that meet the requirements of the rule. We conduct the following programs pursuant to the Rule 3a-4 safe harbor:

•: Separately managed accounts;

Table of Contents

•: Unified managed account portfolios;
•: Mutual fund portfolios and exchange-traded fund portfolios; and
•: Advisor as portfolio manager.

We believe that, to the extent we exercise discretion over accounts in any of these programs, these programs qualify for the safe-harbor because all of the programs have the following characteristics, which are generally required in order for a program to be eligible for the Rule 3a-4 safe harbor:

•: Each client account is managed on the basis of the client's financial situation, investment objectives and reasonable client-imposed investment restrictions;
•: At the opening of the account, the client's financial advisor obtains information from the client and provides us with the client's financial situation, investment objectives and reasonable restrictions;
•: On no less than an annual basis, the client's financial advisor contacts the client to determine whether there have been any changes in the client's financial situation or investment objectives, and whether the client wishes to impose any reasonable restrictions on the management of the account or reasonably modify existing restrictions. This information is communicated to us and reflected in our management of client accounts;
•: On a quarterly basis, we or another designated person (in most cases this will be the client's financial advisor) notify the client to contact us or another designated person if there have been any changes to the client's financial position or investment objectives or if the client wishes to impose any reasonable restrictions on the management of the account;
•: We, the client's financial advisor and the manager of the client's account, all of whom are knowledgeable about the account and its management, are reasonably available to the client for consultation;
•: All of the programs allow each client to impose reasonable restrictions on the management of his or her account;
•: On at least a quarterly basis, the client is provided with a statement containing a description of all activity in the client's account during the preceding period, including all transactions made on behalf of the account, all contributions and withdrawals made by the client, all fees and expenses charged to the account, and the value of the account at the beginning and end of the period; and
•: For all of the programs, each client retains, with respect to all securities and funds in the client's account, the right to withdraw securities or cash, vote securities, or delegate the authority to vote securities to another person, receive written confirmation or other notification of each securities transaction by the client's independent custodian, and proceed directly as a security holder against the issuer of any security in the client's account without the obligation to include us or any other client of the program in any such action as a condition precedent to initiating such proceeding.

Employees

As of December 31, 2014, we had 1,257 employees, including 177 in sales and marketing, 362 in engineering and systems, 570 in operations, 34 in investment management and research, and 114 in executive and corporate functions. Of these 1,257 employees, 478 were located in India. None of our employees is represented by a labor union. We have never experienced a work stoppage and believe our relationship with our employees is good.

Table of Contents

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following table summarizes information about each one of our executive officers.

Name		Position(s)

Judson Bergman	58	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Director
William Crager	50	President
Peter D'Arrigo	47	Chief Financial Officer
Scott Grinis	53	Chief Technology Officer
Shelly O'Brien	49	Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Brandon Thomas	51	Chief Investment Officer
Josh Mayer	41	Chief Operating Officer

Judson Bergman, Age 58. Mr. Bergman is the founder of our company and has served as our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a director since 1999. Prior to founding our company, Mr. Bergman was Managing Director at Nuveen Investments, Inc. ("Nuveen"), a diversified investment manager. Mr. Bergman serves as a trustee of RS Investment Trust and RS Variable Products Trust, registered investment companies. Mr. Bergman received an MBA in finance and accounting from Columbia University and a BA from Wheaton College.

William Crager, Age 50. Mr. Crager has served as our President since 2002. Prior to joining us, Mr. Crager served as Managing Director of Marketing and Client Services at Rittenhouse Financial Services, Inc., an investment management firm affiliated with Nuveen. Mr. Crager received an MA from Boston University and a BA from Fairfield University, with a dual major in economics and English.

Peter D'Arrigo, Age 47. Mr. D'Arrigo has served as our Chief Financial Officer since 2008. Prior to joining us, Mr. D'Arrigo worked at Nuveen where he served as Treasurer since 1999, as well as holding a variety of other titles after joining them in 1990. Mr. D'Arrigo received an MBA from the Northwestern University Kellogg Graduate School of Management and an undergraduate degree in applied mathematics from Yale University.

Scott Grinis, Age 53. Mr. Grinis has served as our Chief Technology Officer since 2004. Prior to joining us, Mr. Grinis co-founded Oberon Financial Technology, Inc., our subsidiary, prior to its acquisition by us. Mr. Grinis received a BS and an MS degree in electrical engineering from Stanford University.

Shelly O'Brien, Age 49. Ms. O'Brien has served as our Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since 2002. Prior to joining us, Ms. O'Brien was General Counsel and Director of Legal and Compliance for ING (U.S.) Securities, Futures & Options Inc., a broker-dealer, and futures commission merchant. Ms. O'Brien received a degree in political science from Northwestern University, a JD from Hamline University School of Law, and an LLM in taxation from John Marshall Law School.

Brandon Thomas, Age 51. Mr. Thomas is a co-founder of our company and has served as Chief Investment Officer and Managing Director of Portfolio Management Consultants, our internal investment management and portfolio consulting group, since 1999. Prior to joining us, Mr. Thomas was Director of Equity Funds for Nuveen. Mr. Thomas received an MBA from the University of Chicago, a JD from DePaul University and is a graduate of Brown University.

Josh Mayer, Age 41. Mr. Mayer was appointed Chief Operating Officer in April 2014. Previously, he served as Envestnet's Executive Vice President and Director of Operations from January 2011 to April 2014, and as Envestnet's Senior Vice President, Head of Operations from 2004 to January 2011. From 2000 to 2004, Mr. Mayer served as the Director of Operations for Oberon Financial Technology, which was acquired by Envestnet in 2004. Mr. Mayer holds a Bachelor of Arts and Sciences from Georgetown University.

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Investment in our securities involves risk. An investor or potential investor should consider the risks summarized in this section when making investment decisions regarding our securities. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risk factors set forth below. The risks and uncertainties described in this section are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also affect our business. If any of these known or unknown risks or uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have experienced rapid revenue growth, which may be difficult to sustain and which may place significant demands on our administrative, operational and financial resources and any inability to maintain or manage our growth could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

Our revenues during the three years ended December 31, 2014 have grown at a compound annual growth rate of 49%. We expect our growth to continue, which could place additional demands on our resources and increase our expenses. Our future growth will depend on, among other things, our ability to successfully grow our total assets under management and administration and add additional clients. If we are unable to implement our growth strategy, develop new investment solutions and services and gain new clients, our results of operations, financial condition or business may be materially adversely affected.

Sustaining growth will also require us to commit additional management, operational and financial resources and to maintain appropriate operational and financial systems. In addition, continued growth increases the challenges involved in:

•: recruiting, training and retaining sufficiently skilled technical, marketing, sales and management personnel;
•: preserving our culture, values and entrepreneurial environment;
•: successfully expanding the range of investment solutions and services offered to our clients;
•: developing and improving our internal administrative infrastructure, particularly our financial, operational, compliance, record-keeping, communications and other internal systems; and
•: maintaining high levels of satisfaction with our investment solutions and services among clients.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain or accelerate our growth, and any failure to do so could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition or business.

Our revenue can fluctuate from period to period, which could cause our share price to fluctuate.

Our revenue may fluctuate from period-to-period in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Factors relating to our business that may contribute to these fluctuations include the following events, as well as other factors described elsewhere in this document:

•: a decline or slowdown of the growth in the value of financial market assets, which may reduce the value of assets under management and administration and therefore our revenues and cash flows;
•: negative public perception and reputation of the financial services industry, which would reduce demand for our investment solutions and services;
•: unanticipated changes to economic terms in contracts with clients, including renegotiations;

Table of Contents

•: downward pressure on fees we charge our clients, which would therefore reduce our revenue;
•: changes in laws or regulations that could impact our ability to offer investment solutions and services;
•: failure to obtain new clients;
•: cancellation or non-renewal of existing contracts with clients;
•: failure to protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property rights;
•: unanticipated delays in connection with the conversion of client assets onto our technology platforms;
•: changes to or a reduction in the suite of investment solutions and services provided to or used by existing clients; or
•: changes in our pricing policies or the pricing policies of our competitors to which we have to adapt.

As a result of these and other factors, the results of operations for any quarterly or annual period may differ materially from the results of operations for any prior or future quarterly or annual period and should not be relied upon as indications of our future performance.

We have a significant amount of debt and servicing our debt requires a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business to service our debt.

As of December 31, 2014, we had $172,500 in outstanding indebtedness related to our 1.75% convertible notes due 2019 (the "Convertible Notes"). Additionally, $100,000 is available under our amended credit facility dated December 8, 2014 ("Credit Agreement"). This indebtedness could, among other things:

•: make it difficult for us to pay other obligations;
•: make it difficult to obtain favorable terms for any necessary future financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements or other purposes;
•: require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to service the indebtedness, reducing the amount of cash flow available for other purposes; and
•: limit our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in our business.

We operate in a highly competitive industry, with many firms competing for business from financial advisors on the basis of a number of factors, including the quality and breadth of investment solutions and services, ability to innovate, reputation and the prices of services and this competition could hurt our financial performance.

We compete with many different types of companies that vary in size and scope, including Pershing LLC (a subsidiary of BNY Mellon Corporation), The Charles Schwab Corporation, SEI Investments Company, AssetMark, Inc., Advent Software, Inc., and Lockwood Advisors (a subsidiary of BNY Mellon Corporation) and which are discussed in greater detail under "Business—Competition" included in this Form 10-K. In addition, some of our clients have developed or may develop the in-house capability to provide the technology and/or investment advisory services they have retained us to perform. These clients may also offer internally developed services to their financial advisors, obviating the need to hire us, and they may offer these services to third-party financial advisors or financial institutions, thereby competing directly with us for that business.

Table of Contents

Many of our competitors have significantly greater resources than we do. These resources may allow our competitors to respond more quickly to changes in demand for investment solutions and services, to devote greater resources to developing and promoting their services and to make more attractive offers to potential clients and strategic partners, which could hurt our financial performance.

We may lose clients as a result of the sale or merger of a client, a change in a client's senior management, competition from other financial advisors and financial institutions and for other reasons. We also face increased competition due to the current trend of industry consolidation. If large financial institutions that are not our clients are able to attract assets from our clients, our ability to grow revenues and earnings may be adversely affected.

Our Envestnet | PMC group competes with other providers of investment solutions and products. These competitors may offer broader solutions and/or products and their solutions and/or products may have better investment returns during one or more periods. If the investment returns on our investment products are not perceived to be competitive, we could experience outflows of assets from these products and face difficulty attracting new assets to these products.

Our failure to successfully compete in any of the above-mentioned areas could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business. Competition could also affect the revenue mix of services we provide, resulting in decreased revenues in lines of business with higher profit margins.

We derive nearly all of our revenues from the delivery of investment solutions and services to clients in the financial advisory industry and our revenue could suffer if that industry experiences a downturn.

A decline or lack of growth in demand for financial advisory services would adversely affect our clients and, in turn, our results of operations, financial condition and business. For example, the availability of free or low-cost investment information and resources, including research and information relating to publicly traded companies and mutual funds available on the Internet or on company websites, could lead to lower demand by investors for the services provided by financial advisors. In addition, demand for our investment solutions and services among financial advisors could decline for many reasons. Consolidation or limited growth in the financial advisory industry could reduce the number of our clients and potential clients. Events that adversely affect our clients' businesses, rates of growth or the numbers of customers they serve, including decreased demand for our clients' products and services, adverse conditions in our clients' markets or adverse economic conditions generally, could decrease demand for our investment solutions and services and thereby decrease our revenues. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

A limited number of clients account for a material portion of our revenue. Termination of our contracts with any of these clients could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, revenues associated with our relationship with our single largest client, FMR LLC, an affiliate of FMR Corp., or Fidelity, accounted for 19%, 20% and 22% respectively, of our total revenues and our ten largest clients accounted for 48%, 46% and 47%, respectively, of our total revenues. Our license agreements with large financial institutions are generally multi-year contracts that may be terminated upon the expiration of the contract term or prior to such time for cause, which may include breach of contract, bankruptcy, insolvency and other reasons. The Fidelity agreement, as amended, which expires in March 2017, includes receiving ongoing platform services fees through the Fidelity relationship based upon asset-based fees. A majority of our agreements with financial advisors generally provides for termination at any time. If our contractual relationship with Fidelity were to terminate, or if a significant number of our most important clients

Table of Contents

were to terminate their contracts with us and we were unable to obtain a significant number of new clients, our results of operations, financial condition or business could be materially adversely affected.

Our clients that pay us an asset-based fee may seek to negotiate a lower fee percentage or may cease using our services, which could limit the growth of, or decrease, our revenues.

A significant portion of our revenues are derived from asset-based fees. Our clients may, for a number of reasons, seek to negotiate a lower asset-based fee percentage. For example, an increase in the use of index-linked investment products by the clients of our financial advisor clients may result in lower fees being paid to our clients, and our clients may in turn seek to negotiate lower asset-based fee percentages for our services. In addition, as competition among our clients increases, they may be required to lower the fees they charge to their clients, which could cause them to seek to decrease our fees accordingly. Any of these factors could result in fluctuation or a decline in our asset-based fees, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

Changes in market and economic conditions could lower the value of assets on which we earn revenues and could decrease the demand for our investment solutions and services.

Asset-based fees make up a significant portion of our revenues. Asset-based fees represented 84%, 83% and 81% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We expect that asset-based fees will continue to represent a significant percentage of our total revenues in the future. Significant fluctuations in securities prices may materially affect the value of the assets managed by our clients and may also influence financial advisor and investor decisions regarding whether to invest in, or maintain an investment in, a mutual fund or other investment solution. If such market fluctuation led to less investment in the securities markets, our revenues and earnings derived from asset-based fees could be materially adversely affected.

We provide our investment solutions and services to the financial services industry. The financial markets, and in turn the financial services industry, are affected by many factors, such as U.S. and foreign economic conditions and general trends in business and finance that are beyond our control. In the event that the U.S. or international financial markets suffer a severe or prolonged downturn, investors may choose to withdraw assets from financial advisors, which we refer to as "redemptions", and transfer them to investments that are perceived to be more secure, such as bank deposits and Treasury securities. For example, in late 2007 and through the first quarter of 2009, the financial markets experienced a broad and prolonged downturn, our redemption rates were higher than our historical average, and our results of operations, financial condition and business were materially adversely affected. Any prolonged downturn in financial markets or increased levels of asset withdrawals could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

Investors' decisions regarding their investment assets are affected by many factors and investors may redeem or withdraw their investment assets generally at any time. Significant changes in investing patterns or large-scale withdrawal of investment funds could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

The clients of our financial advisors are generally free to change financial advisors, forgo the advice and other services provided by financial advisors or withdraw the funds they have invested with financial advisors. These clients of financial advisors may elect to change their investment strategies, by moving their assets away from equity securities to fixed income or other investment options, or by withdrawing all or a portion of their assets from their accounts to avoid all securities markets-related risks. These actions by investors are outside of our control and could materially adversely affect the market value of the investment assets that our clients manage, which could materially adversely affect the asset-based fees we receive from our clients.

Table of Contents

We are subject to liability for losses that result from a breach of our fiduciary duties.

Our investment advisory services involve fiduciary obligations that require us to act in the best interests of our clients, and we may be sued and face liabilities for actual or claimed breaches of our fiduciary duties. Because we provide investment advisory services, both directly and indirectly, with respect to substantial assets we could face substantial liability to our clients if it is determined that we have breached our fiduciary duties. In certain circumstances, which generally depend on the types of investment solutions and services we are providing, we may enter into client agreements jointly with advisors and retain third-party investment money managers on behalf of clients. As a result, we may be included as a defendant in lawsuits against financial advisors and third-party investment money managers that involve claims of breaches of the duties of such persons, and we may face liabilities for the improper actions and/or omissions of such advisors and third-party investment money managers. In addition, we may face claims based on the results of our investment advisory recommendations, even in the absence of a breach of our fiduciary duty. Such claims and liabilities could therefore have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

We are subject to liability for losses that result from potential, perceived or actual conflicts of interest.

Potential, perceived and actual conflicts of interest are inherent in our existing and future business activities and could give rise to client dissatisfaction, litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. In particular, we pay varying fees to third-party asset managers and custodians and our financial advisor customers, or their clients, could accuse us of directing them toward those asset managers or custodians that charge us the lowest fees. In addition, we offer proprietary mutual funds and portfolios of mutual funds through our internal investment management and portfolio consulting group, and financial advisors or their clients could conclude that we favor our proprietary investment products because of their belief that we earn higher fees when our proprietary investment products are used. Adequately addressing conflicts of interest is complex and difficult. If we fail, or appear to fail, to adequately address potential, perceived or actual conflicts of interest, the resulting negative public perception and reputational harm could materially adversely affect our client relations or ability to enter into contracts with new clients and, consequently, our results of operations, financial condition and business.

If our reputation is harmed, our results of operations, financial condition or business could be materially adversely affected.

Our reputation, which depends on earning and maintaining the trust and confidence of our clients, is critical to our business. Our reputation is vulnerable to many threats that can be difficult or impossible to control, and costly or impossible to remediate. Regulatory inquiries or investigations, lawsuits initiated by our clients or stockholders, employee misconduct, perceptions of conflicts of interest and rumors, among other developments, could substantially damage our reputation, even if they are baseless or satisfactorily addressed. In addition, any perception that the quality of our investment solutions and services may not be the same or better than that of other providers, can also damage our reputation. Any damage to our reputation could harm our ability to attract and retain clients, which would materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and business.

If our investment solutions and services fail to perform properly due to undetected errors or similar problems, our results of operations, financial condition and business could be materially adversely affected.

Investment solutions and services we develop or license may contain undetected errors or defects despite testing. Such errors can exist at any point in the life cycle of our investment solutions or services, but are frequently found after introduction of new investment solutions and services or enhancements to existing investment solutions or services. We continually introduce new investment solutions and services and new versions of our investment solutions and services. Despite internal

Table of Contents

testing and testing by current and potential clients, our current and future investment solutions and services may contain serious defects or malfunctions. If we detect any errors before release, we might be required to delay the release of the investment solution or service for an extended period of time while we address the problem. We might not discover errors that affect our new or current investment solutions, services or enhancements until after they are deployed, and we may need to provide enhancements to correct such errors. Errors may occur that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business and could result in harm to our reputation, lost sales, delays in commercial release, third-party claims, contractual disputes, contract terminations or renegotiations, or unexpected expenses and diversion of management and other resources to remedy errors. In addition, negative public perception and reputational damage caused by such claims would adversely affect our client relationships and our ability to enter into new contracts. Any of these problems could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and business.

We could face liability or incur costs to remediate operational errors or to address possible customer dissatisfaction.

Operational risk generally refers to the risk of loss resulting from our operations, including, but not limited to, improper or unauthorized execution and processing of transactions, deficiencies in our operating systems, business disruptions and inadequacies or breaches in our internal control processes. We operate in diverse markets and are reliant on the ability of our employees and systems to process large volumes of transactions often within short time frames. In the event of a breakdown or improper operation of systems, human error or improper action by employees, we could suffer financial loss, regulatory sanctions or damage to our reputation.

In addition, there may be circumstances when our customers are dissatisfied with our investment solutions and services, even in the absence of an operational error. In such circumstances, we may elect to make payments or otherwise incur increased costs or lower revenues in order to maintain a strong customer relationship. In any of the forgoing circumstances, our results of operations, financial condition or business could be materially adversely affected.

We may become subject to liability based on the use of our investment solutions and services by our clients.

Our investment solutions and services support the investment processes of our clients, which, in the aggregate, manage billions of dollars of assets. Our client agreements have provisions designed to limit our exposure to potential liability claims brought by our clients or third parties based on the use of our investment solutions and services. However, these provisions have certain exceptions and could be invalidated by unfavorable judicial decisions or by federal, state, foreign or local laws. Use of our products as part of the investment process creates the risk that clients, or the parties whose assets are managed by our clients, may pursue claims against us for very significant dollar amounts. Any such claim, even if the outcome were to be ultimately favorable to us, would involve a significant commitment of our management, personnel, financial and other resources and could have a negative impact on our reputation. Such claims and lawsuits could therefore have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

Furthermore, our clients may use our investment solutions and services together with software, data or products from other companies. As a result, when problems occur, it might be difficult to identify the source of the problem. Even when our investment solutions and services do not cause these problems, the existence of these errors might cause us to incur significant costs and divert the attention of our management and technical personnel, any of which could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition or business.

Table of Contents

Our business relies heavily on computer equipment, electronic delivery systems and the Internet. Any failures or disruptions in such technologies could result in reduced revenues, increased costs and the loss of customers.

Our business relies heavily on our computer equipment (including our servers), electronic delivery systems and the Internet, but these technologies are vulnerable to disruptions, failures or slowdowns caused by fire, earthquake, power loss, telecommunications failure, terrorist attacks, wars, Internet failures, computer viruses and other events beyond our control. Furthermore, we rely on agreements with our suppliers, such as our current data hosting and service provider, to provide us with access to certain computer equipment, electric delivery systems and the Internet. We are unable to predict whether a future contractual dispute may arise with one of our suppliers that could cause a disruption in service, or whether our agreements with our suppliers can be obtained or renewed on acceptable terms, or at all. An unanticipated disruption, failure or slowdown affecting our key technologies or facilities may have significant ramifications, such as data-loss, data corruption, damaged software codes or inaccurate processing of transactions. We maintain off-site back-up facilities for our electronic information and computer equipment, but these facilities could be subject to the same interruptions that may affect our primary facilities. Any significant disruptions, failures, slowdowns, data-loss or data corruption could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business and result in the loss of customers.

We could face liability related to data and cyber security risks, such as disclosure or theft of the personal information we store on our technology platforms.

Clients may maintain personal investment and financial information on our technology platforms and we could be subject to liability if we were to inappropriately disclose any user's personal information, inadvertently or otherwise, or if third parties were able to penetrate our network security or otherwise gain access to any user's name, address, portfolio holdings or other financial information. A failure to safeguard the integrity and confidentiality of client data and our proprietary data from the infiltration by an unauthorized user may lead to modifications or theft of critical and sensitive data pertaining to us or our clients. Despite our efforts to ensure the integrity of our proprietary systems and information, it is possible that we may not be able to anticipate or to implement effective preventive measures against all cyber threats, especially because the methods used change frequently or are not recognized until launched. Any such event could subject us to claims for misuses of personal information, such as unauthorized marketing or unauthorized access to personal portfolio information and could therefore have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

We could incur significant costs protecting the personal information we store on our technology platforms.

Users of our investment solutions and services are located in the United States and around the world. As a result, we collect and store the personal information of individuals who live in many different countries. Privacy regulators in some of those countries have publicly stated that foreign entities (including entities based in the United States) may render themselves subject to those countries' privacy laws and the jurisdiction of such regulators by collecting or storing the personal data of those countries' residents, even if such entities have no physical or legal presence there. Consequently, we may be obligated to comply with the privacy and data security laws of such foreign countries. Our exposure to foreign countries' privacy and data security laws impacts our ability to collect and use personal information, increases our legal compliance costs and may expose us to liability.

We have incurred, and will continue to incur, expenses to comply with privacy and security standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry standards or contractual obligations. Increased domestic or international regulation of data utilization and distribution practices could require us to modify our operations and incur significant additional expense, which could have a

Table of Contents

material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business. Additionally, security breaches or disruptions of our proprietary systems, or those of our service providers, could impact our ability to provide services to our clients, which could expose us to liability for damages which may not be covered by insurance, result in the loss of customer business, damage our reputation, subject us to regulatory scrutiny or expose us to civil litigation. In addition, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify, investigate or remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures arising from data and cyber security risks. Furthermore, even if not directed at us specifically, attacks on other financial institutions could disrupt the overall functioning of the financial system.

We could face liability for certain information we provide, including information based on data we obtain from other parties.

We may be subject to claims for securities law violations, negligence, breach of fiduciary duties or other claims relating to the information we provide. For example, individuals may take legal action against us if they rely on information we have provided and it contains an error. In addition, we could be subject to claims based upon the content that is accessible from our website through links to other websites. Moreover, we could face liability based on inaccurate information provided to us by others. Defending any such claims could be expensive and time-consuming, and any such claim could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition or business.

We depend on our senior management team and other key personnel and the loss of their services could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

We depend on the efforts, relationships and reputations of our senior management team and other key personnel, including Judson Bergman, our Chief Executive Officer, William Crager, our President, and Scott Grinis, our Chief Technology Officer, in order to successfully manage our business. We believe that success in our business will continue to be based upon the strength of our intellectual capital. The loss of the services of any member of our senior management team or of other key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

Our operations are subject to extensive government regulation, and compliance failures or regulatory action against us could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition or business.

The financial services industry is among the most extensively regulated industries in the United States. We operate investment advisory, broker-dealer, mutual fund and collective investment trust lines of business, each of which is subject to a specific and extensive regulatory scheme. In addition, we are subject to numerous laws and regulations of general application. It is very difficult to predict the future impact of the legislative and regulatory requirements affecting our business and our clients' businesses.

Certain of our subsidiaries are registered as "investment advisers" with the SEC under the Advisers Act and are regulated thereunder. In addition, many of our investment advisory services are conducted pursuant to the non-exclusive safe harbor from the definition of an "investment company" provided under Rule 3a-4 under the Investment Company Act. If Rule 3a-4 were to cease to be available, or if the SEC were to modify the rule or its interpretation of how the rule is applied, our business could be adversely affected. Certain of our registered investment adviser subsidiaries provide advice to mutual fund clients and collective investment trusts. Mutual funds are registered as "investment companies" under the Investment Company Act. Our advisory subsidiaries provide advice on assets subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"). The Advisers Act, Investment Company Act and ERISA, together with related regulations and interpretations of the SEC and the Department of Labor, impose numerous obligations and restrictions on investment advisers and mutual funds, including requirements relating to the safekeeping of client funds and securities, limitations on advertising, disclosure and reporting obligations, prohibitions on fraudulent

Table of Contents

activities, restrictions on transactions between an adviser and its clients, and between a mutual fund and its advisers and affiliates, and other detailed operating requirements, as well as general fiduciary obligations. Collective investment trusts are unregistered funds operated by a trust company or a bank regulated by the OCC. In our role as advisor to these funds, we operate under substantially similar obligations to those discussed above for mutual funds.

In addition, PBS, our broker-dealer subsidiary, is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC and with all 50 states and the District of Columbia, and is a member of FINRA, a securities industry self-regulatory organization that supervises and regulates the conduct and activities of its members. Broker-dealers are subject to regulations that cover all aspects of their business, including sales practices, market making and trading among broker-dealers, use and safekeeping of customer funds and securities, capital structure, recordkeeping and the conduct of directors, officers, employees, representatives and associated persons. FINRA conducts periodic examinations of the operations of its members, including PBS. As a broker-dealer, PBS is also subject to certain minimum net capital requirements under SEC and FINRA rules. Compliance with the net capital rules may limit our ability to withdraw capital from PBS.

All of the foregoing laws and regulations are complex and we are required to expend significant resources in order to maintain our compliance with such laws and regulations. Any failure on our part to comply with these and other applicable laws and regulations could result in regulatory fines, suspensions of personnel or other sanctions, including revocation of our registration or that of our subsidiaries as an investment adviser or broker-dealer, as the case may be, which could, among other things, require changes to our business practices and scope of operations or harm our reputation, which, in turn could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

Changes to the laws or regulations applicable to us or to our financial advisor clients could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition or business.

We may be adversely affected as a result of new or revised legislation or regulations imposed by the SEC or other U.S. or foreign governmental regulatory authorities or self-regulatory organizations that supervise the financial markets around the world. In addition, we may be adversely affected by changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules by these governmental authorities and self-regulatory organizations. It is impossible to determine the extent of the impact of any new laws, regulations or initiatives that may be proposed, or whether any current proposals will become law, and it is difficult to predict how any changes or potential changes could affect our business. Changes to laws or regulations could increase our potential liability in connection with the investment solutions and services that we provide. The introduction of any new laws or regulations could make our ability to comply with applicable laws and regulations more difficult and expensive. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

A deemed "change of control" of our company could require us to obtain the consent of our clients and a failure to do so properly could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition or business.

Under the Advisers Act, the investment advisory agreements entered into by our investment adviser subsidiaries may not be assigned without the client's consent. Under the Investment Company Act, advisory agreements with registered funds terminate automatically upon assignment and, any assignment of an advisory agreement must be approved by the board of directors and the shareholders of the registered fund. Under the Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act, such an assignment may be deemed to occur upon a change of control of the Company. A change of control includes either gaining or losing a "controlling person." Whether someone is a controlling person for these purposes depends significantly on the specific facts and circumstances. There can be no assurance that

Table of Contents

if we undergo a change of control, we would be successful in obtaining all necessary consents or that the method by which we obtain such consents could not be challenged at a later time. If we are unable to obtain all necessary consents or if such a challenge were to be successful it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

We rely on exemptions from certain laws and if for any reason these exemptions were to become unavailable to us, we could become subject to regulatory action or third-party claims and our business could be materially and adversely affected.

We regularly rely on exemptions from various requirements of the Exchange Act, the Investment Company Act and ERISA in conducting our activities. These exemptions are sometimes highly complex and may in certain circumstances depend on compliance by third parties whom we do not control. If for any reason these exemptions were to become unavailable to us, we could become subject to regulatory action or third-party claims and our business could be materially and adversely affected.

If government regulation of the Internet or other areas of our business changes, or if consumer attitudes toward use of the Internet change, we may need to change the manner in which we conduct our business or incur greater operating expenses.

The adoption, modification or interpretation of laws or regulations relating to the Internet or other areas of our business could adversely affect the manner in which we conduct our business. Such laws and regulations may cover sales practices, taxes, user privacy, data protection, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution, electronic contracts, consumer protection, broadband residential Internet access and the characteristics and quality of services. Moreover, it is not clear how existing laws governing these matters apply to the Internet. If we are required to comply with new regulations or legislation or new interpretations of existing regulations or legislation, we may be required to incur additional expenses or alter our business model, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

We are substantially dependent on our intellectual property rights, and a failure to protect these rights could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition or business.

We have made substantial investments in software and other intellectual property on which our business is highly dependent. We rely on trade secret, trademark and copyright laws, confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements and other contractual and technical security measures to protect our proprietary technology. Any loss of our intellectual property rights, or any significant claim of infringement or indemnity for violation of the intellectual property rights of others, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

Many of our key technologies, investment solutions or services are not covered by any copyright registration, issued patent or patent application. We are the owner of certain patent rights, registered trademarks in the United States, including "ENVESTNET," and we claim common law rights in other trademarks that are not registered. We cannot guarantee that:

•: our intellectual property rights will provide competitive advantages to us;
•: our ability to assert our intellectual property rights against potential competitors or to settle current or future disputes will not be limited by our agreements with third parties;
•: our intellectual property rights will be enforced in jurisdictions where competition may be intense or where legal protection may be weak;
•: any of the trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets or other intellectual property rights that we presently employ in our business will not lapse or be invalidated, circumvented, challenged or abandoned;

Table of Contents

•: our trademark applications will lead to registered trademarks; or
•: competitors will not design around our intellectual property rights or develop similar technologies, investment solutions or products; or that we will not lose the ability to assert our intellectual property rights against others.

We are also a party to a number of third-party intellectual property license agreements. Some of these license agreements require us to make one-time payments or ongoing subscription payments. We cannot guarantee that the third-party intellectual property we license will not be licensed to our competitors or others in our industry. In the future, we may need to obtain additional licenses or renew existing license agreements. We are unable to predict whether these license agreements can be obtained or renewed on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, we have granted our customers certain rights to use our intellectual property in the ordinary course of our business. Some of our customer agreements restrict our ability to license or develop certain customized technology or services within certain markets or to certain competitors of our customers. For example, our agreement with Fidelity restricts our ability to develop an enterprise-level integration or combination of products and services substantially similar to the technology platform we have developed for Fidelity. Some of our customer agreements grant our customers ownership rights with respect to the portion of the intellectual property we have developed or customized for our customers. In addition, some of our customer agreements require us to deposit the source code to the customized technology and investment solutions with a source code escrow agent, which source code may be released in the event we enter into bankruptcy or are unable to provide support and maintenance of the technology or investment solutions we have licensed to our customers. These provisions in our agreements may limit our ability to grow our business in the future.

Third parties may sue us for intellectual property infringement or misappropriation which, if successful, could require us to pay significant damages or make changes to the investment solutions or services that we offer.

We cannot be certain that our internally developed or acquired technologies, investment solutions or services do not and will not infringe the intellectual property rights of others. In addition, we license content, software and other intellectual property rights from third parties and may be subject to claims of infringement if such parties do not possess the necessary intellectual property rights to the products they license to us. The risk of infringement claims against us will increase if more of our competitors are able to obtain patents for investment solutions or services or business processes. In addition, we face additional risk of infringement or misappropriation claims if we hire an employee who possesses third party proprietary information who decides to use such information in connection with our investment solutions, services or business processes without such third-party's authorization. We have in the past been and may in the future be subject to legal proceedings and claims that we have infringed or misappropriated the intellectual property rights of a third party. These claims sometimes involve patent holding companies who have no relevant product revenues and against whom our own proprietary technology may therefore provide little or no deterrence. In addition, third parties may in the future assert intellectual property infringement claims against our customers, which, in certain circumstances, we have agreed to indemnify. Any intellectual property related infringement or misappropriation claims, whether or not meritorious, could result in costly litigation and could divert management resources and attention. Moreover, should we be found liable for infringement or misappropriation, we may be required to enter into licensing agreements, if available on acceptable terms or at all, pay substantial damages or make changes to the investment solutions and services that we offer. Any of the foregoing could prevent us from competing effectively, result in substantial costs to us, divert management's attention and our resources away from our operations and otherwise harm our reputation.

Table of Contents

If our intellectual property and proprietary technology are not adequately protected to prevent use or appropriation by our competitors, our business and competitive position would suffer.

Our future success and competitive position depend in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property rights. The steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property rights may be inadequate to prevent the misappropriation of our proprietary technology. There can be no assurance that others will not develop or patent similar or superior technologies, investment solutions or services. Unauthorized copying or other misappropriation of our proprietary technologies could enable third parties to benefit from our intellectual property rights without paying us for doing so, which could harm our business. Policing unauthorized use of proprietary technology is difficult and expensive and our monitoring and policing activities may not be sufficient to identify any misappropriation and protect our proprietary technology. In addition, third parties may knowingly or unknowingly infringe our trademarks and other intellectual property rights, and litigation may be necessary to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights. If litigation is necessary to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights, any such litigation could be very costly and could divert management attention and resources. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights or if third parties independently develop or gain access to our or similar technologies, investment solutions or services, our results of operations, financial condition and business could be materially adversely affected.

The use of "open source code" in investment solutions may expose us to additional risks and harm our intellectual property rights.

To a limited extent, we rely on open source code to develop our investment solutions and support our internal systems and infrastructure. While we monitor our use of open source code to attempt to avoid subjecting our investment solutions to conditions we do not intend, such use could inadvertently occur. Additionally, if a third-party software provider has incorporated certain types of open source code into software we license from such third party for our investment solutions, we could, under certain circumstances, be required to disclose the source code for our investment solutions. This could harm our intellectual property position and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and business.

Confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants and others may not adequately prevent disclosure of trade secrets and other proprietary information.

We have devoted substantial resources to the development of our proprietary technologies, investment solutions and services. In order to protect our proprietary rights, we enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and independent contractors. These agreements may not effectively prevent unauthorized disclosure of confidential information or unauthorized parties from copying aspects of our technologies, investment solutions or products or obtaining and using information that we regard as proprietary. Moreover, these agreements may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of such unauthorized disclosures of confidential information and we cannot assure you that our rights under such agreements will be enforceable. In addition, others may independently discover trade secrets and proprietary information, and in such cases we could not assert any trade secret rights against such parties. Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection could reduce any competitive advantage we have developed and cause us to lose customers or otherwise harm our business.

Table of Contents

Our failure to successfully integrate acquisitions could strain our resources. In addition, there are significant risks associated with growth through acquisitions, which may materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition or business.

We expect to grow our business by, among other things, making acquisitions. Over the past four years we have completed five significant acquisitions. Acquisitions involve a number of risks. They can be time-consuming and may divert management's attention from day-to-day operations. Financing an acquisition could result in dilution from issuing equity securities or a weaker balance sheet from using cash or incurring debt. Acquisitions might also result in losing key employees. In addition, we may fail to successfully integrate acquisitions. We may also fail to generate enough revenues or profits from an acquisition to earn a return on the associated purchase price.

To the extent we grow our business through acquisitions, any such future acquisitions could present a number of other risks, including:

•: incorrect assumptions regarding the future results of acquired operations or assets or expected cost reductions or other synergies expected to be realized as a result of acquiring operations or assets;
•: failure to integrate the operations or management of any acquired operations or assets successfully and on a timely and cost effective basis;
•: insufficient knowledge of the operations and markets of acquired businesses;
•: loss of key personnel;
•: failure to obtain necessary customer consents or retain key customers;
•: diversion of management's attention from existing operations or other priorities;
•: increased costs or liabilities as a result of undetected or undisclosed legal, regulatory or financial issues related to acquired operations or assets; and
•: inability to secure, on terms we find acceptable, sufficient financing that may be required for any such acquisition or investment.

In addition, if we are unsuccessful in completing acquisitions of other businesses, operations or assets or if such opportunities for expansion do not arise, our results of operations, financial condition or business could be materially adversely affected.

Our failure to successfully execute the conversion of our clients' assets from their technology platform to our platforms in a timely and accurate manner could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

When we begin working with a new client, or acquire new client assets through an acquisition or other transaction, we are often required to convert all or a significant portion of assets from the clients' technology platform to our technology platforms. These conversions present significant technological and operational challenges can be time-consuming and may divert management's attention from other operational activities. If we fail to successfully complete our conversions in a timely and accurate manner, we may be required to expend more time and resources than anticipated, which could erode the profitability of the client relationship. In addition, any such failure may harm our reputation and may make it less likely that prospective clients will commit to working with us. Any of these risks could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition or business.

Table of Contents

Our business will suffer if we do not keep up with rapid technological change, evolving industry standards or changing requirements of clients.

We expect technological developments to continue at a rapid pace in our industry. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to:

•: continue to develop our technology expertise;
•: recruit and retain skilled technology professionals;
•: enhance our current investment solutions and services;
•: develop new investment solutions and services that meet changing client needs;
•: implement changes to our investment solutions and services to meet changing regulatory requirements;
•: advertise and market our investment solutions and services;
•: protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property rights; or
•: influence and respond to emerging industry standards and other technological changes.

We must accomplish these tasks in a timely and cost-effective manner and our failure to do so could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition or business.

We must continue to introduce new investment solutions and services and investment solution and service enhancements to address our clients' changing needs, market changes and technological developments and failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

The market for our investment solutions and services is characterized by shifting client demands, evolving market practices and, for some of our investment solutions and services, rapid technological change. Changing client demands, new market practices or new technologies can render existing investment solutions and services obsolete and unmarketable. As a result, our future success will continue to depend upon our ability to develop new investment solutions and services and investment solution and service enhancements that address the future needs of our target markets and respond to technological and market changes. We incurred technology development expenditures of $11,560, $9,141 and $8,659 in the years ended December, 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We expect that our technology development expenditures will continue at this level or they may increase in the future. We may not be able to accurately estimate the impact of new investment solutions and services on our business or how their benefits will be perceived by our clients. Further, we may not be successful in developing, introducing, marketing and licensing our new investment solutions or services or investment solution or service enhancements on a timely and cost effective basis, or at all, and our new investment solutions and services and enhancements may not adequately meet the requirements of the marketplace or achieve market acceptance. In addition, clients may delay purchases in anticipation of new investment solutions or services or enhancements. Any of these factors could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition or business.

Certain provisions in our charter documents and agreements and Delaware law may inhibit potential acquisition bids for our company and prevent changes in our management.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contains provisions that could depress the trading price of our common stock by acting to discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company or changes in management that our stockholders might deem advantageous. As a result of these provisions in our certificate of incorporation, the price investors may be willing to pay for shares of our common stock may be limited.

Table of Contents

In addition, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which imposes certain restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our common stock.

We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common stock.

We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. Consequently, investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any gains on their investment. Investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our common stock.

The conditional conversion feature of the Convertible Notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

In the event the conditional conversion feature of the Convertible Notes is triggered, holders of the Convertible Notes will be entitled to convert their Convertible Notes at any time during specified periods at their option. If one or more holders elect to convert their Convertible Notes, unless we satisfy our conversion obligation by delivering solely shares of our common stock (other than cash in lieu of any fractional share), we would be required to settle all or a portion of our conversion obligation through the payment of cash, which could adversely affect our liquidity. We may, at any time prior to the final settlement method election date, irrevocably elect to satisfy our conversion obligation with respect to each subsequent conversion date in cash or in a combination of cash and shares of our common stock, if any, with a particular specified dollar amount, as defined in the prospectus supplement dated December 9, 2014, in which case we will no longer be permitted to settle the corresponding portion of our conversion obligation in shares of our common stock. Furthermore, even if holders do not elect to convert their Convertible Notes, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the Convertible Notes as a current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital.

We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to settle conversions of the Convertible Notes or purchase the Convertible Notes as required upon a fundamental change, and our existing debt contains, and our future debt may contain, limitations on our ability to pay cash upon conversion or purchase of the Convertible Notes.

Following a fundamental change, holders of Convertible Notes will have the right to require us to purchase their Convertible Notes for cash. A fundamental change may also constitute an event of default or prepayment under, and result in the acceleration of the maturity of, our then-existing indebtedness. In addition, upon conversion of the Convertible Notes, unless we settle our conversion obligation solely in shares of our common stock (other than cash in lieu of any fractional share), we will be required to make cash payments in respect of the Convertible Notes being surrendered for conversion. We may not have sufficient financial resources, or will be able to arrange financing, to pay the fundamental change purchase price in cash with respect to any Convertible Notes surrendered by holders for purchase upon a fundamental change or make cash payments upon conversions. In addition, restrictions in our Credit Agreement or future credit facilities or other indebtedness, if any, may not allow us to purchase the Convertible Notes upon a fundamental change or make cash payments upon conversions of the Convertible Notes. Our failure to purchase the Convertible Notes upon a fundamental change or make cash payments upon conversions thereof when required would result in an event of default with respect to the Convertible Notes which could, in turn, constitute a default under the terms of our other indebtedness, if any. If the repayment of the related indebtedness

Table of Contents

were to be accelerated after any applicable notice or grace periods, we may not have sufficient funds to repay the indebtedness and purchase the Convertible Notes or make cash payments upon conversions thereof.

In completing our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to controls over the portion of revenues and cost of revenues of a business that was acquired in 2013, Wealth Management Solutions, that was not migrated to the Envestnet core technology platform in 2014. We also did not have adequately designed or documented controls related to the financial statement review process, including the review of manual journal entries, and our failure to remedy this or other material weaknesses that we may identify in the future could result in material misstatements in our financial statements.

In 2014, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to controls over the portion of revenues and cost of revenues of a business that was acquired in 2013, Wealth Management Solutions, that was not migrated to the Envestnet core technology platform in 2014. We also did not have adequately designed or documented controls related to the financial statement review process, including the review of manual journal entries. Our failure to remedy this material weakness or material weaknesses that we may identify in the future could result in material misstatements in our financial statements. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.

A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

As further described in "Item 9A.—Controls and Procedures," we are in the process of designing the necessary steps to remediate the material weakness that was identified. Although no assurance can be given as to when the remediation plan will be finalized and completed, management believes the remediation efforts will be completed prior to December 31, 2015. We cannot assure you that these remedial measures will be sufficient to address this material weakness, or that additional material weaknesses in our internal control will not be identified in the future. Any failure to maintain adequate internal controls could result in our inability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis which could harm our business.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Our headquarters are located in Chicago, Illinois, and consist of approximately 43,000 square feet of leased space. We also lease office space in Denver, Colorado; New York, New York; Sunnyvale, California; Boston and Wellesley Massachusetts; Seattle, Washington; Landis and Raleigh, North Carolina; Addison, Texas and Trivandrum, India. We believe that our office facilities are adequate for our immediate needs and that additional or substitute space is available if needed to accommodate the foreseeable growth of our operations.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe that the outcome of any of these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, would, if determined adversely to us, have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or business.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

This section is not applicable.

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

(a): Market Information

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol (ENV).

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sale prices of our common stock, for each of the periods presented below as reported in the consolidated reporting system for the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions.

	2013

	High		Low
Quarter ended March 31, 2013	$	17.54	$	13.31
Quarter ended June 30, 2013	$	24.94	$	17.14
Quarter ended September 30, 2013	$	31.76	$	24.83
Quarter ended December 31, 2013	$	40.30	$	28.62

	2014

	High		Low
Quarter ended March 31, 2014	$	47.87	$	38.98
Quarter ended June 30, 2014	$	49.64	$	34.14
Quarter ended September 30, 2014	$	48.88	$	43.44
Quarter ended December 31, 2014	$	54.50	$	38.94

(b): Holders

The approximate number of holders of record of our common stock was 144 as of February 20, 2015.

(c): Dividends

We have not paid dividends for the most recent two years.

Common Stock

As of December 31, 2014, we had 500,000,000 common shares authorized at a par value of $0.005, of which 34,544,653 shares were outstanding.

Preferred Stock

As of December 31, 2014, we had 50,000,000 preferred shares authorized at a par value of $0.005, of which no shares were outstanding.

(d): Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan

For a description of securities authorized under our equity compensation plans, see Note 13 to the notes to consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8.

(e): Stock Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative return to stockholders on our common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the Russell® 2000 Index and The S&P North American Technology-Services Index^TM from the effective date of our initial public offering on July 28, 2010 through

Table of Contents

December 31, 2014. In calculating total annual stockholder return, reinvestment of dividends, if any, is assumed. The indices are included for comparative purposes only. This graph is not "soliciting material," is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

53 MONTH STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH

	7/28/2010		12/31/2010		12/31/2011		12/31/2012		12/31/2013		12/31/14

Envestnet, Inc.	$	100.00	$	189.55	$	132.89	$	155.00	$	447.78	$	546.00
Russell® 2000 Index		100.00		119.02		114.05		132.70		181.05		196.15
S&P North American Technology-Services Index^TM		100.00		112.38		126.21		153.33		217.42		237.83

The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

(f): Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None

(g): Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities



October 1, 2014 through October 31, 2014			—	—
November 1, 2014 through October 31, 2014			—	—
December 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014	1,353	46.34	—	—

Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Consolidated Statements of Operations

	Year ended December 31,

	2014		2013		2012		2011			2010
	(in thousands, except for share and per share information)
Revenues:
Assets under management or administration	$	294,223	$	200,568	$	127,213	$	99,236		$	75,951
Licensing and professional services		54,525		41,967		30,053		23,942			22,101

Total revenues		348,748		242,535		157,266		123,178			98,052

Operating expenses:
Cost of revenues		150,067		98,970		56,119		42,831			31,444
Compensation and benefits		104,457		77,442		54,973		40,305			37,027
General and administration		54,321		44,808		30,617		21,856			21,607
Depreciation and amortization		18,651		15,329		12,400		6,376			5,703
Restructuring charges		—		474		115		434			961

Total operating expenses		327,496		237,023		154,224		111,802			96,742

Income from operations		21,252		5,512		3,042		11,376			1,310
Other income (expense), net		1,255		200		26		(796	)		(403	)

Income before income tax provision		22,507		5,712		3,068		10,580			907
Income tax provision		8,528		2,052		2,603		2,975			1,533

Net income (loss)		13,979		3,660		465		7,605			(626	)
Less: Preferred stock dividends		—		—		—		—			(422	)
Add: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		195		—		—		—			—

Income (loss) attributable to common shareholders	$	14,174	$	3,660	$	465	$	7,605		$	(1,048	)



Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders
Basic	$	0.41	$	0.11	$	0.01	$	0.24		$	(0.05	)



Diluted	$	0.38	$	0.10	$	0.01	$	0.23		$	(0.05	)



Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		34,559,558		33,191,088		32,162,672		31,643,390			20,805,911



Diluted		36,877,599		35,666,575		33,341,615		32,863,834			20,805,911

Table of Contents

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data

	December 31,

	2014		2013		2012		2011		2010
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	209,754	$	49,942	$	29,983	$	64,909	$	67,668
Working capital		177,315		26,384		14,785		64,944		62,979
Goodwill and intangible assets		163,630		110,033		92,794		33,559		3,361
Total assets		439,358		221,242		162,399		137,702		141,868
Long-term debt		145,203		—		—		—		—
Stockholders' equity		201,435		147,772		125,996		115,639		102,319

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Except where we have otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, dollar amounts presented in this Form 10-K are in thousands, except for Item 9, Exhibits and per share amounts.

Overview

Envestnet empowers financial advisors to deliver fee-based advice to their clients. We work with both independent advisors (RIAs), as well as advisors associated with financial institutions (broker-dealers, banks). The services we offer and market to financial advisors address advisors' ability to grow their practice as well as operate more efficiently—the Envestnet platforms span from the initial meeting an advisor has with a prospective client to the ongoing day-to-day operations of managing an advisory practice.

Our centrally-hosted technology platforms, which we refer to as having "open architecture" because of their flexibility, provide financial advisors with access to a series of integrated services to help them better serve their clients. These services include risk assessment and selection of investment strategies and solutions, asset allocation models, research and due diligence, portfolio construction, proposal generation and paperwork preparation, model management and account rebalancing, account monitoring, customized fee billing, overlay services covering asset allocation, tax management and socially responsible investing, aggregated multi-custodian performance reporting and communication tools, as well as access to a wide range of leading third-party asset custodians.

The services delivered through our software are enabled and supported by our employees. In addition to the U.S.-based employees that provide operations, investment management and research, and other support services to our advisor clients, we maintain a presence in India where our employees provide back-office support, including overnight data reconciliation services, as well as quality control, technology operations support and software development.

We offer these solutions principally through the following product and services suites:

•: Envestnet's wealth management software empowers advisors to better manage client outcomes and strengthen their practice. Our software unifies the applications and services advisors use to manage their practice and advise their clients, including financial planning; capital markets assumptions; asset allocation guidance; research and due diligence on investment managers and funds; portfolio management, trading and rebalancing; multi-custodial, aggregated performance reporting; and billing calculation and administration.

Table of Contents

•: Envestnet | PMC®, our Portfolio Management Consultants group, primarily engages in consulting services aimed at providing financial advisors with additional support in addressing their clients' needs, as well as the creation of proprietary investment solutions and products. Envestnet | PMC's investment solutions and products include managed account and multi-manager portfolios, mutual fund portfolios and ETF portfolios. Envestnet | PMC also offers Prima Premium Research, comprising institutional-quality research and due diligence on investment managers, mutual funds, ETFs and liquid alternatives funds.
•: Envestnet | Tamarac^TM provides leading portfolio accounting, rebalancing, trading, performance reporting and CRM software, principally to high-end RIAs.
•: Vantage Reporting Solution^TM software aggregates and manages investment data, provides performance reporting and benchmarking, giving advisors an in-depth view of clients' various investments, empowering advisors to give holistic, personalized advice.
•: Envestnet | WMS^TM offers financial institutions access to an integrated wealth platform, which helps construct and manage sophisticated portfolio solutions across an entire account life cycle, particularly in the area of UMA trading. Envestnet | WMS's Overlay Portfolio Management console helps wealth managers efficiently build customized client portfolios that consider both proprietary and open-architecture investment solutions.
•: Envestnet | Placemark^TM develops UMA programs and other portfolio management outsourcing solutions, including patented portfolio overlay and tax optimization services, for banks, full service broker-dealers and RIA firms.

We believe that our business model results in a high degree of recurring and predictable financial results.

Revenues

Overview

We earn revenues primarily under two pricing models. First, a majority of our revenues is derived from fees charged as a percentage of the assets that are managed or administered on our technology platforms by financial advisors. These revenues are recorded under revenues from assets under management ("AUM") or administration ("AUA") or collectively ("AUM/A"). Our asset-based fees vary based on the types of investment solutions and services that financial advisors utilize. Asset-based fees accounted for approximately 84%, 83% and 81% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In future periods, the percentage of our total revenues attributable to asset-based fees is expected to vary based on fluctuations in securities markets, whether we enter into significant license agreements, the mix of AUM or AUA, and other factors. As of December 31, 2014, approximately $246 billion of investment assets subject to asset-based fees were managed or administered utilizing our technology platforms by approximately 29,000 financial advisors through approximately 978,000 investor accounts.

We also generate revenues from recurring, contractual licensing fees for providing access to our technology platforms. These revenues are recorded under revenues from licensing and professional services. Licensing fees are generally fixed in nature for the contract term and are based on the level of investment solutions and services provided, rather than on the amount of client assets on our technology platforms. Licensing fees accounted for 14%, 15% and 15% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Fees received in connection with professional services and other revenue accounted for the remainder of our total revenues. As of December 31, 2014, approximately $467 billion of investment assets for which we receive licensing fees for utilizing our technology platforms were serviced by approximately 12,000 financial advisors through approximately 1,881,000 investor accounts.

Table of Contents

The following table provides information regarding the amount of assets utilizing our platform technology, investor accounts and financial advisors in the periods indicated.

	As of December 31,

	2014		2013		2012
	(in millions except accounts and advisors data)
Platform Assets
Assets Under Management (AUM)	$	72,120	$	45,706	$	30,970
Assets Under Administration (AUA)		174,249		132,215		67,368

Subtotal AUM/A		246,369		177,921		98,338
Licensing		466,982		358,919		269,729

Total Platform Assets	$	713,351	$	536,840	$	368,067



Platform Accounts
AUM		310,351		211,039		156,327
AUA		667,274		524,806		293,151

Subtotal AUM/A		977,625		735,845		449,478
Licensing		1,881,352		1,508,254		1,228,016

Total Platform Accounts		2,858,977		2,244,099		1,677,494



Advisors
AUM/A		28,605		22,838		16,085
Licensing		11,632		7,794		6,941

Total Advisors		40,237		30,632		23,026

Revenues from assets under management or administration

We generally charge our customers fees based on a higher percentage of the market value of AUM than the fees we charge on the market value of AUA, because we provide fiduciary oversight and/or act as the investment advisor in connection with assets we categorize as AUM. The level of fees varies based on the nature of the investment solutions and services we provide, as well as the specific investment manager, fund and/or custodian chosen by the financial advisor. A portion of our revenues from assets under management or administration include costs paid by us to third parties for sub-advisory, clearing, custody and brokerage services. These expenses are recorded under cost of revenues. We do not have fiduciary responsibility in connection with AUA and, therefore, generally charge lower fees on these assets. Our fees for AUA vary based on the nature of the investment solutions and services we provide.

For over 85% of our revenues from assets under management or administration, we bill customers at the beginning of each quarter based on the market value of customer assets on our platforms as of the end of the prior quarter. For example, revenues from assets under management or administration recognized during the fourth quarter of 2014 were primarily based on the market value of assets as of September 30, 2014. Our revenues from assets under management or administration are generally recognized ratably throughout the quarter based on the number of days in the quarter.

Our revenues from assets under management or administration are affected by the amount of new assets that are added to existing and new client accounts, which we refer to as gross sales. Gross sales, from time to time, also include conversions of client assets to our technology platforms. The amount of assets that are withdrawn from client accounts are referred to as redemptions. We refer to the difference between gross sales and redemptions as net flows. Positive net flows indicate that the market value of assets added to client accounts exceeds the market value of assets that have been withdrawn from client accounts.

Table of Contents

Our revenues from assets under management or administration are also affected by changes in the market values of securities held in client accounts due to fluctuations in the securities markets. Certain types of securities have historically experienced greater market price fluctuations, such as equity securities, than other securities, such as fixed income securities, though in any given period the type of securities that experience the greatest fluctuations may vary.

The following table provides information regarding the degree to which gross sales, redemptions, net flows and changes in the market values of assets contributed to changes in AUM or AUA in the periods indicated.

	Asset Rollforward—2014

	12/31/13		Placemark		Gross Sales		Redemptions			Net Flows		Market Impact		Reclass to Licensing			12/31/14
	(in millions except account data)
Assets under Management (AUM)	$	45,706	$	15,404	$	22,355	$	(12,414	)	$	9,941	$	1,069	$	—		$	72,120
Assets under Administration (AUA)		132,215		—		77,514		(37,424	)		40,090		5,102		(3,158	)		174,249

Total AUM/A	$	177,921	$	15,404	$	99,869	$	(49,838	)	$	50,031	$	6,171	$	(3,158	)	$	246,369



Fee-Based Accounts		735,845		45,187							220,003				(23,410	)		977,625

The above AUM/A gross sales figures include $28.2 billion in new client conversions. The Company onboarded an additional $66.9 billion in licensing conversions during 2014, bringing total conversions for the year to $95.1 billion.

	Asset Rollforward—2013

	12/31/12		WMS		Gross Sales		Redemptions			Net Flows		Market Impact		12/31/13
	(in millions except account data)
Assets under Management (AUM)	$	30,970	$	—	$	20,043	$	(9,663	)	$	10,380	$	4,356	$	45,706
Assets under Administration (AUA)		67,368		24,680		51,261		(22,478	)		28,783		11,384		132,215

Total AUM/A	$	98,338	$	24,680	$	71,304	$	(32,141	)	$	39,163	$	15,740	$	177,921



Fee-Based Accounts		449,478		86,014							200,353				735,845

The above AUM/A gross sales figures include $24.5 billion in new client conversions. The Company onboarded an additional $33.6 billion in licensing conversions during 2013, bringing total conversions for the year to $58.1 billion.

The mix of assets under management and assets under administration was as follows as of the dates indicated:

	December 31,

	2014			2013			2012
Assets under management (AUM)		29	%		26	%		31	%
Assets under administration (AUA)		71	%		74	%		69	%

		100	%		100	%		100	%

We expect the percentage of AUM and AUA will fluctuate in future periods. The nature and type of services requested by our customers are the key drivers in determining whether customer assets are classified as AUM or AUA. Therefore, we do not have direct control over the mix of AUM and AUA.

Table of Contents

Revenues from licensing and professional services fees

Our revenues received under license agreements are recognized over the contractual term. To a lesser degree we also receive revenues from professional services fees by providing customers with certain technology platform software development and implementation services. In the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, our revenues from professional services fees were $3,978, $5,089 and $6,145, respectively. These revenues are generally recognized under a proportional-performance model utilizing an output-based approach or on a straight-line basis over the estimated life of the customer relationship. Our contracts generally have fixed prices, and generally specify or quantify interim deliverables.

We may enter into license agreements in future periods if requested by our customers and commercially attractive to us.

Expenses

The following is a description of our principal expense items.

Cost of revenues

Cost of revenues primarily includes expenses related to our receipt of sub-advisory and clearing, custody and brokerage services from third parties. The largest component of cost of revenues is paid to third party investment managers. Clearing, custody and brokerage services are performed by third-party providers. These expenses are typically calculated based upon a contractual percentage of the market value of assets held in customer accounts measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter and are recognized ratably throughout the quarter based on the number of days in the quarter. Also included in cost of revenues are vendor specific expenses related to the direct support of revenues associated with the Envestnet | Tamarac products.

Compensation and benefits

Compensation and benefits expenses primarily relate to employee compensation, including salaries, commissions, non-cash stock-based compensation, incentive compensation, benefits and employer-related taxes.

General and administration

General and administration expenses include occupancy costs and expenses relating to communications services, research and data services, website and system development, marketing, professional and legal services and travel and entertainment.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization expenses include depreciation and amortization related to:

•: fixed assets, including computer equipment and software, leasehold improvements, office furniture and fixtures and other office equipment;
•: internally developed software; and
•: intangible assets, primarily related to customer lists, proprietary technology and trade names, the value of which are capitalized in connection with our acquisitions.

Furniture and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the depreciable assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated economic useful lives or the remaining lease term, whichever is shorter.

Table of Contents

Improvements are capitalized, while repairs and maintenance costs are recorded as expenses in the period they are incurred. Assets are tested for recoverability whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.

Internally developed software is amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life. We evaluate the useful lives of these assets on an annual basis and test for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances occur that could impact the recoverability of these assets.

Intangible assets are depreciated using an accelerated or straight-line basis over their estimated economic useful lives and are reviewed for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances occur that could impact the recoverability of these assets.

Interest expense

Interest expense includes coupon interest, discount amortization, and issuance cost amortization related to the Convertible Notes as well as amortization of upfront fees and monthly fees related to the Credit Agreement. The discount, issuance costs, and upfront fees are amortized over the term of the related agreements.

General Conditions and Trends Affecting Our Business

Our exposure to market risk is directly related to the market value of assets on our platforms, as we earn revenues from assets under management ("AUM") or administration ("AUA") based upon a contractual percentage of AUM or AUA. As a result, our net flows, revenues and profitability have been and could be impacted negatively or positively by changes in overall market conditions going forward. The broad equity markets improved during 2014 compared to 2013, as the Nasdaq Composite Index, Standard & Poor's 500 Index, MSCI World Index, Dow Jones Industrial Average and Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index increased 13.4%, 11.4%, 2.1%, 7.5% and 6.0%, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014, our AUM and AUA increased by $6 billion due to the overall favorable market impact.

Market Trends

The wealth management industry has experienced significant growth in terms of assets invested by retail investors in the past several years. According to the Federal Reserve, U.S. household and non-profit organization financial assets totaled $66.8 trillion as of September 30, 2014, up 2.7% from $65.0 trillion at December 31, 2013. As a leading provider of unified wealth management software and services to financial advisors, we believe we are well positioned to take advantage of favorable secular trends in the wealth management industry, including those described below:

Table of Contents

Our Growth Strategy

We serve the fastest growing segments of the wealth management industry. We intend to grow by increasing our advisor base, increasing the share of our clients' business on our platforms, expanding our services utilized by each advisor and obtaining new enterprise clients through the use of marketing and internal sales personnel. In addition, we intend to selectively pursue acquisitions, investments and other relationships that we believe can enhance the attractiveness of our technology platforms or expand our client base. Acquisitions involve a number of risks, including our ability to integrate acquired companies into ours in an effective and timely manner. We have historically financed our acquisitions with available cash and debt; however, the financing of future acquisitions could result in dilution from issuing equity securities or a weakening of our balance sheet from using available cash or incurring debt.

Recent Developments

2014 Developments

Non-controlling Interest

Effective February 1, 2014, we formed Envestnet Retirement Solutions, LLC ("ERS, LLC") with various third parties. ERS, LLC offers advisory and technology enabled services to financial advisors and retirement plans. In exchange for an initial 64.5% ownership interest in ERS, LLC, we contributed certain assets and have agreed to fund a certain amount of the operating expenses of ERS, LLC.

Klein Decisions, Inc.

On July 1, 2014, ERS, LLC completed the acquisition of Klein Decisions, Inc. ("Klein"). In accordance with the stock purchase agreement, ERS, LLC acquired all of the outstanding shares of Klein for cash consideration of approximately $1,288, a promissory note in the amount of $1,500, and estimated fair value of $3,285 in contingent consideration (with a minimum guaranteed amount of $1,175), to be paid over three years. The promissory note was paid by ERS, LLC on July 31, 2014. Klein develops dynamic decision systems that incorporate investor preferences, goals, and priorities into the investment process. ERS, LLC acquired Klein for its capabilities in delivering personal participant solutions, as well as its personnel to further build out ERS's business of serving advisors who support the small retirement plan market.

On July 9, 2014, the former owners of Klein (the "Klein Parties") purchased an 11.7% ownership interest in ERS, LLC for $1,500. The Klein Parties have the right to require ERS, LLC to repurchase units issued anytime between 18 and approximately 36 months after July 1, 2014 for the amount of $1,500. This purchase obligation is guaranteed by Envestnet. After taking into account the purchase of the Klein Parties, Envestnet's ownership interest in ERS, LLC as of December 31, 2014 is 57%. For more information on the acquisition, see Note 3 to the notes to consolidated financial statements.

Placemark Holdings, Inc.

On October 1, 2014, we completed the acquisition of Placemark for $66,701 in cash, including the effect of certain post-closing adjustments. Placemark develops UMA programs and other portfolio management outsourcing solutions, including patented portfolio overlay and tax optimization services, for banks, full-service broker-dealers and RIA firms. We acquired Placemark for its UMA and overlay capabilities, to strengthen the Company's position as a leading provider of UMA offerings, and to expand its presence in the full-service broker-dealer and RIA markets. The goodwill arising from the acquisition represents the expected synergistic benefits of the transaction, which relate to an increase in future revenues as a result of leveraging Placemark's systems and expertise of its employees, and lower future operating expenses and technology platform-related costs due to the migration of Placemark's

Table of Contents

clients to our technology platforms. For more information on the acquisition, see Note 3 to the notes to consolidated financial statements.

Credit Agreement

On June 19, 2014, Envestnet and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement (the "Original Credit Agreement") with a group of banks (the "Banks"), for which Bank of Montreal acted as administrative agent, pursuant to which the Banks agreed to provide an unsecured revolving credit facility of $70,000 with a sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit of $5,000. Subject to certain conditions, Envestnet had the right to increase the facility by up to $25,000. The Original Credit Agreement was scheduled to terminate on June 19, 2017, at which time any aggregate principal amount of borrowings outstanding would become payable in full. Any borrowings made under the Original Credit Agreement accrued interest at rates between 1.25 percent and 1.75 percent above LIBOR based on the Envestnet's total leverage ratio. There was also a commitment fee equal to 0.25 percent per annum on the daily unused portion of the facility.

On December 8, 2014, Envestnet and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a first amendment to the Original Credit Agreement (collectively with the Original Credit Agreement, the "Credit Agreement"), dated June 19, 2014. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the amount of the unsecured revolving credit facility was increased from $70,000 to $100,000 with a sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit of $5,000. Subject to certain conditions, Envestnet has the right to increase the facility by up to $25,000. The Credit Agreement is scheduled to mature on December 8, 2017. As of December 31, 2014, there was no bank indebtedness outstanding and we were in compliance with all covenants. For more information on the Credit Agreement, see Note 11 to the notes to consolidated financial statements.

Public Offering of Convertible Notes

On December 15, 2014, we issued $172,500 of Convertible Notes. Net proceeds from the offering were $166,967. The Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 1.75 percent per annum payable semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on June 15, 2015.

The Convertible Notes are general unsecured obligations, subordinated in right of payment to our obligations under our Credit Agreement. The Convertible Notes are convertible into shares of the Company's common stock under certain circumstances prior to maturity at a conversion rate of 15.9022 shares per $1 principal amount of the Convertible Notes, which represents a conversion price of $62.88 per share, subject to adjustment under certain conditions. For more information on the Convertible Notes, see Note 11 to the notes to consolidated financial statements.

2013 Developments

Wealth Management Solutions

On July 1, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of the WMS division of Prudential Investments for $8,992 in cash upon closing, plus contingent consideration of up to a total of $23,000 in cash, based upon meeting certain performance targets, to be paid over three years. WMS is a provider of technology solutions that enables financial services firms to develop and enhance their wealth management offerings.

Public Offering of Common Shares

On October 11, 2013, the Company completed a public offering of 5,801,997 common shares on behalf of selling stockholders. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders. The Company incurred costs of $1,089 during the year ended December 31,

Table of Contents

2013 in relation to the public offering and this amount is included in general and administration expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or ("U.S. GAAP"). The accounting policies described below require management to apply significant judgment in connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. In particular, judgment is applied to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in calculating estimates that affect certain reported amounts in our consolidated financial statements. These estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. If different estimates or assumptions were used, our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could have been materially different than those reflected in our consolidated financial statements. For additional information regarding our critical accounting policies, see Note 2 to the notes to consolidated financial statements.

Revenue recognition

We recognize revenues when all four of the following criteria have been met:

•: Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
•: The product has been delivered or the service has been performed;
•: The fee is fixed or determinable; and
•: Collectability is reasonably assured.

Types of revenues

We generate revenues from assets under management or administration and from licensing and professional service fees. Revenues from assets under management or administration are generated from fees based on a contractual percentage of assets under management or administration valued at each quarter-end. These fees are generally collected at the beginning of a quarter in advance based upon the previous quarter-end values. In less than 15% of our contracts, fees are collected at the end of the quarter based upon the average daily balance. The contractual fee percentages vary based upon the level and type of services we provide to our customers. Pursuant to the contracts with our customers, we calculate our fees based on the asset values, without making any judgment or estimates. None of our fees is earned pursuant to performance-based or other incentive-based arrangements.

We generate revenues from licensing fees pursuant to recurring contractual fixed-fee agreements. Our licensing fees vary based on the type of services we provide. We generate revenues from professional service fees by providing customers with customized technology platform software development and implementation services. These revenues are received pursuant to contracts that generally detail the nature of the services to be provided by us, the estimated number of hours such work will require and the total contract fee amount.

Recognition of revenues

Application of the applicable accounting principles of U.S. GAAP requires us to make judgments and estimates in connection with the measurement and recognition of certain revenues. Revenues are recognized in the period in which the related services are provided. In certain cases, management is required to determine whether revenues should be recognized in an amount equal to the gross fees we receive or net of payments of expenses to third-parties, such as third party investment managers and

Table of Contents

custodians, that perform services for us in connection with certain of our financial advisors' client accounts. Generally, when fees are collected for investment management, clearing, custody or brokerage services in circumstances where we do not have a direct contract with the third-party provider, the fees are recorded as revenue on a net basis. Fees we received in advance of the performance of services are recorded as deferred revenues on our consolidated balance sheet and are recognized as revenues when earned, generally over three months.

The Company derives licensing fees from recurring contractual fixed fee contracts with larger financial institutions or enterprise clients. Licensing contracts allow the customer to provide a unique configuration of platform features and investment solutions for their advisors. The licensing fees vary based on the type of services provided and our revenues received under license agreements are recognized over the contractual term. The Company's license agreements do not generally provide its customers the ability to take possession of the software or host the software on the customers' own systems or through a hosting arrangement with an unrelated party.

When the Company enters into arrangements with multiple deliverables, exclusive of arrangements with software deliverables, it applies the FASB's guidance for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables and evaluates each deliverable to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting based on the following criteria: (i) whether the delivered item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, and (ii) if the contract includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in the control of the Company. Revenue is allocated to each unit of accounting or element based on relative selling prices. The Company determines relative selling prices by using either (a) vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE") if it exists; or (b) third-party evidence ("TPE") of selling price. When neither VSOE nor TPE of selling price exists for a deliverable, the Company uses its best estimate of the selling price for that deliverable.

After determining which deliverables represent a separate unit of accounting, each unit is then accounted for under the applicable revenue recognition guidance. In cases where elements cannot be treated as separate units of accounting, the elements are combined into a single unit of accounting for revenue recognition purposes. If one of the elements that are combined into a single unit of accounting is fees from professional services, including implementation related services or customized service platform software development, the professional service fees are recognized over the course of the expected customer relationship. We have estimated the life of the customer relationship by considering both the historical retention rate of our customers while not exceeding the number of years over which we can accurately forecast future revenues. We currently estimate this term to be five years.

The Company also derives professional service fees from providing contractual customized platform software development and implementation services, which are recognized under a proportional-performance model utilizing an output-based approach. The Company's contracts generally have fixed prices, and generally specify or quantify deliverables.

Our revenue recognition is also affected by our judgment in determining whether collectability is reasonably assured. With regard to allowances for uncollectible receivables, we consider customer-specific information related to delinquent accounts and past loss experience, as well as current economic conditions in establishing the amount of the allowance.

Purchase accounting

In 2012, we completed the acquisitions of Prima and Tamarac for consideration totaling $13,925 and $48,427, respectively. In 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of WMS for total consideration of $24,730. In 2014, ERS, LLC completed the acquisition of Klein for total consideration of $5,588. In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company completed the acquisition of Placemark for total

Table of Contents

consideration of $66,701. For more information on the acquisitions see Note 3 to the notes to consolidated financial statements.

Assigning fair market values to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of an acquisition requires knowledge of current market values, and the values of assets in use, and often requires the application of judgment regarding estimates and assumptions. While the ultimate responsibility resides with management, for material acquisitions, we retain the services of certified valuation specialists to assist with assigning estimated values to certain acquired assets and assumed liabilities, including intangible assets and contingent consideration.

Acquired intangible assets, excluding goodwill, are valued using a discounted cash flow methodology based on future cash flows specific to the type of intangible asset purchased. This methodology incorporates various estimates and assumptions, the most significant being projected revenue growth rates, margins, and forecasted cash flows based on the discount rate and terminal growth rate. Management projects revenue growth rates, margins and cash flows based on the historical operating results of the acquired entity adjusted for synergies anticipated to be achieved through integration, expected future performance, operational strategies, and the general macroeconomic environment. We review finite-lived intangible assets for triggering events such as significant changes in operations, customers or future revenue that might indicate the need to impair the assets acquired or change the useful lives of the assets acquired. There was no impairment or change in useful lives recognized on other intangible assets in 2014, 2013 or 2012.

Assumed liabilities are valued based on estimates of anticipated expenditures to be incurred to satisfy the assumed obligations, including contractual liabilities assumed, which require the exercise of professional judgment.

Assumed contracts may have favorable or unfavorable terms that must be valued as of the acquisition date. Such valuation is subject to management judgment regarding the evaluation and interpretation of contract terms in relation to other economic circumstances, such as the market rates for office space leases.

If we assume a performance obligation to customers as of the acquisition date, a deferred revenue obligation is recognized. Judgment is required to evaluate whether a future performance obligation exists and to assign a value to the performance obligation.

Estimation of working capital settlement amounts, if not resolved prior to the first reporting period after an acquisition, but before the end of the purchase measurement period, requires exercise of management judgment. We measure these amounts at the acquisition date fair value, if their fair value can be determined during the measurement period. If these estimated working capital settlement amounts are not resolved prior to the first reporting period after acquisition, we recognize the asset or liability if it can be reasonably estimated. Subsequent adjustments to these provisional working capital settlement amounts are evaluated by management to determine the proper accounting treatment under relevant authoritative guidance.

Assumed acquired tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions are dependent on assessing the past practices of the acquisition target based on our review of actual tax filings and information obtained through due diligence procedures. Evaluation of the validity of tax positions taken by the acquisition target are subject to management judgment.

The Company determines the fair value of contingent acquisition consideration payable on the acquisition date using a discounted cash flow approach utilizing an appropriate discount rate. Each reporting period thereafter, the Company revalues these obligations and records increases or decreases in their fair value as adjustments to fair market value adjustment on contingent consideration in the Company's consolidated statements of operations. Changes in the fair value of the contingent

Table of Contents

acquisition consideration payable can result from adjustments to the estimated revenue forecasts included in the contingent payment calculations.

Internally developed software

Costs relating to internally developed software that are incurred in the preliminary stages of development are expensed as incurred. Management determines when projects have met the criteria of the application development stage. This typically occurs when the conceptual formulation and evaluation of software functionality are finalized.

Once work on a software application has passed the preliminary stages, internal and external costs, if direct and incremental, are capitalized until the software application is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. These costs include expenditures related to software design, technical specifications, coding, and parallel testing. We cease capitalizing these costs upon completion of all substantial testing of the software application.

We also capitalize costs related to specific upgrades and enhancements of our internally developed software when we conclude that it is probable that the expenditures will result in additional functionality. Our maintenance and training costs are expensed as incurred.

Non-cash stock-based compensation expense

Non-cash stock-based compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock grants is estimated at the grant date based on each grant's fair value, calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for stock options, and intrinsic value for restricted stock. Compensation and benefits expenses are recognized over the vesting period for each grant. The fair value of our stock options and the resulting expenses are based on various assumptions, including the expected volatility of our stock price, the expected term of the stock options, estimated forfeiture rates and the risk-free interest rate. The use of different assumptions would result in different fair values and compensation and benefits expenses for our option grants.

We use the "simplified" method in developing an estimate of expected term of stock options. We base the risk-free interest rate on zero-coupon yields implied from U.S. Treasury issues with remaining terms similar to the expected term on the options. We estimate expected volatility based on historical volatility of Envestnet's common stock and that of comparable companies from a representative peer group based on industry and market capitalization data. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and therefore use an expected dividend yield of zero in the option-pricing model. We are required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. If we use different assumptions for estimating stock-based compensation expense in future periods or if actual forfeitures differ materially from our estimated forfeitures, future stock-based compensation expense may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period and could materially affect our operating income, net income and net income per share.

The Envestnet, Inc. Management Incentive Plan for Envestnet | Tamarac Management Employees (the "2012 Plan") provides for the grant of up to 559,551 shares of unvested common stock ("Target Incentive Awards"). The Target Incentive Awards vest based upon Tamarac meeting certain performance conditions and then a subsequent two-year service condition. We measured the cost of

Table of Contents

these awards based on the estimated fair value of the award as of the market closing price on the day before the acquisition closed. We are recognizing the estimated expense on a graded-vesting method over a requisite service period of three to five years, which is the estimated vesting period. We estimate expected vesting amounts and recognize compensation expense only for those awards expected to vest. This estimate is reassessed by management each reporting period and may change based upon new facts and circumstances. Changes in the assumptions impact the total amount of expense ultimately recognized over the vesting period.

Income taxes

We are subject to income taxes in the United States, India and Canada. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes.

We use the asset and liability method to account for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and for net operating loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Company's income tax provision in the period that includes the enactment date. We record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that we determine is more-likely-than-not to be realized in the future.

In our ordinary course of business, we may enter into transactions for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. In such cases, we establish reserves for tax-related uncertainties based on our estimates of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. The reserves are established when we believe that certain positions are likely to be challenged and may not be fully sustained on review by tax authorities. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit or refinement of an estimate. Although we believe our reserves are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will not be different from that which is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will be reflected in our provision for income taxes. The provision for income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate.

The amount of income tax we pay is subject to audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities, which may result in proposed assessments. Our estimate of the potential outcome for any uncertain tax issue is highly judgmental. We believe that we have adequately provided for the foreseeable outcome related to these matters. However, our future results may include favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities in the period the assessments are made or resolved, audits are closed or when statutes of limitations on potential assessments expire. Additionally, the jurisdictions in which our earnings or deductions are realized may differ from our current estimates. As a result, our effective tax rate may fluctuate significantly on a quarterly basis.

Significant judgment is also required in determining any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we consider all available evidence, including past operating results, estimates of future taxable income and the feasibility of tax planning strategies. In the event that we change our determination as to the amount of deferred tax assets that can be realized, we will adjust our valuation allowance with a corresponding impact to the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made.

Table of Contents

We are subject to examination of our income tax returns by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from these examinations will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. The Company is currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Our India subsidiary is currently under examination by the India Tax Authority for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011 and 2012. Based on the outcome of examinations of our subsidiary or the result of the expiration of statutes of limitations, it is reasonably possible that the related unrecognized tax benefits could change from those recorded in the consolidated balance sheets. It is possible that one or more of these audits may be finalized within the next twelve months.

Results of Operations

Year ended December 31, 2014 compared to year ended December 31, 2013

	Year Ended December 31,					Increase (Decrease)

	2014			2013		Amount			%
	(in thousands)
Revenues:
Assets under management or administration	$	294,223		$	200,568	$	93,655			47	%
Licensing and professional services		54,525			41,967		12,558			30	%

Total revenues		348,748			242,535		106,213			44	%

Operating expenses:
Cost of revenues		150,067			98,970		51,097			52	%
Compensation and benefits		104,457			77,442		27,015			35	%
General and administration		54,321			44,808		9,513			21	%
Depreciation and amortization		18,651			15,329		3,322			22	%
Restructuring charges		—			474		(474	)		–100	%

Total operating expenses		327,496			237,023		90,473			38	%

Income from operations		21,252			5,512		15,740			286	%
Other income:
Interest income		139			18		121				*
Interest expense		(626	)		—		(626	)			*
Other income, net		1,742			182		1,560				*

Total other income		1,255			200		1,055				*

Income before income tax provision		22,507			5,712		16,795			294	%
Income tax provision		8,528			2,052		6,476				*

Net income		13,979			3,660		10,319			282	%
Add: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		195			—		195				*

Net income attributable to Envestnet, Inc.	$	14,174		$	3,660	$	10,514			287	%

*: Not meaningful

Revenues

Total revenues increased 44% from $242,535 in 2013 to $348,748 in 2014. The increase was primarily due to an increase in revenues from assets under management or administration of $93,655.

Table of Contents

Revenues from assets under management or administration comprised 84% and 83% of total revenues in 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Assets under management or administration

Revenues earned from assets under management or administration increased 47% from $200,568 in 2013 to $294,223 in 2014. The increase was primarily due to an increase in asset values applicable to our quarterly billing cycles in 2014, relative to the corresponding period in 2013. In 2014, revenues were positively affected by new account growth, market appreciation and positive net flows of AUM or AUA during 2013 and 2014, as well as an increase in revenues related to the July 1, 2013 acquisition of WMS, and the October 1, 2014 acquisition of Placemark.

The number of financial advisors with AUM or AUA on our technology platforms increased from 22,838 as of December 31, 2013 to 28,605 as of December 31, 2014 and the number of AUM or AUA client accounts increased from approximately 736,000 as of December 31, 2013 to approximately 978,000 as of December 31, 2014.

Licensing and professional services

Licensing and professional services revenues increased 30% from $41,967 in 2013 to $54,525 in 2014. This increase was primarily due to an increase in licensing and other revenue of $13,668, primarily due to an increase in Tamarac related revenue, and offset by a decrease in professional services revenue of $1,111.

Cost of revenues

Cost of revenues increased 52% from $98,970 in 2013 to $150,067 in 2014, primarily due to the corresponding increase in revenues from AUM or AUA, inclusive of an increase related to the WMS acquisition. As a percentage of total revenues, cost of revenues increased from 41% in 2013 to 43% in 2014.

Compensation and benefits

Compensation and benefits increased 35% from $77,442 in 2013 to $104,457 in 2014, primarily due to an increase in salaries, benefits and other compensation expense of $20,335 related to an increase in headcount, an increase in incentive compensation of $3,529 and an increase in non-cash compensation expense of $2,685. Headcount increased from an average of 857 in 2013 to an average of 1,103 in 2014, primarily to support the growth of our operations, as well as increased headcount from the WMS and Placemark acquisitions. As a percentage of total revenues, compensation and benefits decreased from 32% in 2013 to 30% in 2014.

General and administration

General and administration expenses increased 21% from $44,808 in 2013 to $54,321 in 2014, primarily due to year-over-year increases in website and systems development costs of $2,801, professional and legal fees of $3,049, travel and entertainment of $1,945, occupancy costs of $2,346, and communication, research and data services costs of $1,740, offset by decreases in fair value of contingent consideration adjustments of $1,933 and re-audit related expenses of $3,110. As a percentage of total revenues, general and administration expenses decreased from 18% in 2013 to 16% in 2014.

Table of Contents

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased 22% from $15,329 in 2013 to $18,651 in 2014, primarily due to an increase in intangible asset amortization of $2,188 as a result of intangible assets recorded in purchase accounting related to the WMS and Placemark acquisitions (see Note 3 to the notes to consolidated financial statements). The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was also due to increases in capitalized computer equipment and software to support the growth of our operations. As a percentage of total revenues, depreciation and amortization decreased from 6% in 2013 to 5% in 2014.

Restructuring charges

In 2013, we incurred restructuring charges of $474 due to lease termination penalties incurred to terminate the Denver and Raleigh leases.

Interest expense

Interest expense increased from $0 in 2013 to $626 in 2014 as a result of the issuance of the Convertible Notes as well as the borrowing of $30,000 on the Credit Agreement during the fourth quarter of 2014. Interest expense includes coupon interest, discount amortization, and issuance cost amortization related to the Convertible Notes as well as amortization of upfront fees and monthly fees related to the Credit Agreement. The discount, issuance costs, and upfront fees are amortized over the term of the related agreement.

Other income, net

Other income, net increased by $1,560, primarily as a result of an agreement reached with a vendor regarding the recovery of certain expenses totaling $1,825, which we incurred in 2013.

Income tax provision

	Year Ended December 31,

	2014			2013
	(in thousands)
Income tax provision	$	8,528		$	2,052
Effective tax rate		37.9	%		35.9	%

Our 2014 effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate primarily due to the effect of state taxes, permanent differences, the generation of research and development tax credits, the carryforward period expiration of capital loss carryforwards, the change in the valuation allowance, and net operating loss adjustments resulting from a recently completed Section 382 study.

Our 2013 effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate primarily as a result of non-deductible transaction costs, unrecognized tax benefits in the U.S., the benefit of foreign tax credits, as well as the benefit of research and development tax credits. The non-deductible transaction costs relate to a secondary offering of our common stock completed in the fourth quarter. The unrecognized tax benefits are a result of positions taken on prior year tax returns and the research and development credits are a result of a comprehensive study completed by the Company for tax years 2007-2013.

Table of Contents

Year ended December 31, 2013 compared to year ended December 31, 2012

	Year Ended December 31,					Increase (Decrease)

	2013		2012			Amount			%
	(in thousands)
Revenues:
Assets under management or administration	$	200,568	$	127,213		$	73,355			58	%
Licensing and professional services		41,967		30,053			11,914			40	%

Total revenues		242,535		157,266			85,269			54	%

Operating expenses:
Cost of revenues		98,970		56,119			42,851			76	%
Compensation and benefits		77,442		54,973			22,469			41	%
General and administration		44,808		30,617			14,191			46	%
Depreciation and amortization		15,329		12,400			2,929			24	%
Restructuring charges		474		115			359				*

Total operating expenses		237,023		154,224			82,799			54	%

Income from operations		5,512		3,042			2,470			81	%

Other income:
Interest income		18		29			(11	)		–38	%
Interest expense		—		(3	)		3			–100	%
Other income		182		—			182				*

Total other income		200		26			174				*

Income before income tax provision		5,712		3,068			2,644			86	%
Income tax provision		2,052		2,603			(551	)		–21	%

Net income	$	3,660	$	465		$	3,195				*

*: Not meaningful

Revenues

Total revenues increased 54% from $157,266 in 2012 to $242,535 in 2013. The increase was primarily due to an increase in revenues from assets under management or administration of $73,355. Revenues from assets under management or administration comprised 83% and 81% of total revenues in 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Assets under management or administration

Revenues earned from assets under management or administration increased 58% from $127,213 in 2012 to $200,568 in 2013. The increase was primarily due to an increase in asset values applicable to our quarterly billing cycles in 2013, relative to the corresponding period in 2012. In 2013, revenues were positively affected by new account growth and positive net flows of AUM or AUA during 2012 and 2013, as well as an increase in revenues related to the WMS acquisition, on July 1, 2013.

The number of financial advisors with AUM or AUA on our technology platforms increased from 16,085 as of December 31, 2012 to 22,838 as of December 31, 2013 and the number of AUM or AUA client accounts increased from approximately 450,000 as of December 31, 2012 to approximately 736,000 as of December 31, 2013.

Table of Contents

Licensing and professional services

Licensing and professional services revenues increased 40% from $30,053 in 2012 to $41,967 in 2013. This increase was primarily due to an increase in licensing revenue of $12,978, primarily due to a full year of Tamarac operations in 2013, and a decrease in professional services revenue of $1,056.

Cost of revenues

Cost of revenues increased 76% from $56,119 in 2012 to $98,970 in 2013, primarily due to the corresponding increase in revenues from AUM or AUA, inclusive of an increase related to the WMS acquisition. As a percentage of total revenues, cost of revenues increased from 36% in 2012 to 41% in 2013.

Compensation and benefits

Compensation and benefits increased 41% from $54,973 in 2012 to $77,442, primarily due to an increase in salaries, benefits and commission expense of $14,126 related to an increase in headcount, an increase in incentive compensation of $2,797 and an increase in non-cash compensation expense of $4,701, primarily related to Tamarac meeting certain performance metrics related to the 2012 Plan, as well as the accounting impact of a modification to the 2012 Plan in April of 2013. Headcount increased from an average of 655 in 2012 to an average of 857 in 2013, primarily to support the growth of our operations, as well as increased headcount from the WMS acquisition. As a percentage of total revenues, compensation and benefits decreased from 35% in 2012 to 32% in 2013.

General and administration

General and administration expenses increased 46% from $30,617 in 2012 to $44,808 in 2013, primarily due to one-time re-audit related expenses of $3,110, and year-over-year increases in website and systems development costs of $3,239, professional and legal fees of $2,094, travel and entertainment of $1,125, occupancy costs of $1,238, imputed interest expense on contingent consideration of $787, fair value of contingent consideration adjustment of $501 and communication, research and data services costs of $1,533. As a percentage of total revenues, general and administration expenses decreased from 19% in 2012 to 18% in 2013. Excluding re-audit related expenses of $3,110, general and administration expenses as a percentage of total revenues would have been 17% for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased 24% from $12,400 in 2012 to $15,329 in 2013, primarily due to an increase in intangible asset amortization of $2,287 as a result of intangible assets recorded in purchase accounting related to the Prima and Tamarac acquisitions in 2012 and the WMS acquisition in the third quarter of 2013 (see Note 3 to the notes to consolidated financial statements). The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was also due to increases in capitalized computer equipment and software to support the growth of our operations. As a percentage of total revenues, depreciation and amortization decreased from 8% in 2012 to 6% in 2013.

Restructuring charges

In 2013, we incurred restructuring charges of $474 due to lease termination penalties incurred to terminate the Denver and Raleigh leases. In 2012, we incurred restructuring charges of $115 primarily for severance charges related to the termination of certain Prima and Tamarac employees related to these acquisitions.

Table of Contents

Income tax provision

	Year Ended December 31,

	2013			2012
	(in thousands)
Income tax provision	$	2,052		$	2,603
Effective tax rate		35.9	%		84.8	%

Our 2013 effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate primarily as a result of non-deductible transaction costs, unrecognized tax benefits in the U.S., the benefit of foreign tax credits, as well as the benefit of research and development credits. The non-deductible transaction costs relate to a secondary offering of our common stock completed in the fourth quarter. The unrecognized tax benefits are a result of positions taken on prior year tax returns and the research and development credits are a result of a comprehensive study completed by the Company for tax years 2007-2013.

Our 2012 effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate primarily as a result of unrecognized tax benefits recorded in India, the effect of state tax rate changes, permanent differences, and changes in the valuation of federal and state net operating losses and adjustments to state deferred tax assets. The unrecognized tax benefits recorded relate to India tax exposure resulting from an examination performed by the India Taxing Authority. The change in state tax rates was primarily related to recognizing the benefit of state tax deductions on our federal tax return as well as changes in state tax laws regarding the sourcing of state taxable income. The adjustments to state deferred tax assets result from an analysis performed on the tax basis of fixed assets. It was determined that our net deferred tax assets did not properly reflect the future state tax benefits that will be recorded, and therefore we adjusted our balances accordingly.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

	Year Ended December 31,

	2014		2013		2012
	(in thousands)
Adjusted revenues	$	348,748	$	242,695	$	158,514
Adjusted EBITDA		55,938		38,594		23,988
Adjusted net income		29,537		19,094		10,570
Adjusted net income per share		0.80		0.54		0.32

"Adjusted revenues" excludes the effect of purchase accounting on the fair value of acquired deferred revenue. Under U.S. GAAP, we record at fair value the acquired deferred revenue for contracts in effect at the time the entities were acquired. Consequently, revenue related to acquired entities for periods subsequent to the acquisition does not reflect the full amount of revenue that would have been recorded by these entities had they remained stand-alone entities.

"Adjusted EBITDA" represents net income (loss) before deferred revenue fair value adjustment, interest income, interest expense, income tax provision, depreciation and amortization, non-cash compensation expense, restructuring charges and transaction costs, re-audit related expenses, severance, imputed interest on contingent consideration, fair market value adjustment on contingent consideration, litigation-related expense, other income, and pre-tax loss attributable to non-controlling interest.

"Adjusted net income" represents net income (loss) before deferred revenue fair value adjustment, non-cash interest expense, non-cash compensation expense, restructuring charges and transaction costs, re-audit related expenses, severance, amortization of acquired intangibles, fair-market value adjustment on contingent consideration, litigation related expense, other income and net loss attributable to non-controlling interest. Reconciling items, excluding non-deductible transaction costs, are tax effected using the income tax rates in effect on the applicable date.

Table of Contents

"Adjusted net income per share" represents adjusted net income attributable to common stockholders divided by the diluted number of weighted-average shares outstanding.

Our Board of Directors and our management use adjusted revenues, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share:

•: As measures of operating performance;
•: For planning purposes, including the preparation of annual budgets;
•: To allocate resources to enhance the financial performance of our business;
•: To evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies; and
•: In communications with our Board of Directors concerning our financial performance.

Our Compensation Committee, Board of Directors and our management may also consider adjusted EBITDA, among other factors, when determining management's incentive compensation.

We also present adjusted revenues, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share as supplemental performance measures because we believe that they provide our Board of Directors, management and investors with additional information to assess our performance. Adjusted revenues provide comparisons from period to period by excluding the effect of purchase accounting on the fair value of acquired deferred revenue. Adjusted EBITDA provide comparisons from period to period by excluding potential differences caused by variations in the age and book depreciation of fixed assets affecting relative depreciation expense and amortization of internally developed software, amortization of acquired intangible assets, litigation-related expense, income tax provision, restructuring charges and transaction costs, re-audit related expenses, imputed interest on contingent consideration, fair market value adjustments on contingent consideration, other income, severance, pre-tax loss attributable to non-controlling interest, and changes in interest expense and interest income that are influenced by capital structure decisions and capital market conditions. Our management also believes it is useful to exclude non-cash stock-based compensation expense from adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income because non-cash equity grants made at a certain price and point in time do not necessarily reflect how our business is performing at any particular time.

We believe adjusted revenues, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share are useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance because securities analysts use adjusted revenues, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share as supplemental measures to evaluate the overall performance of companies, and we anticipate that our investor and analyst presentations will include adjusted revenues, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share.

Adjusted revenues, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share are not measurements of our financial performance under U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to revenues, net income, operating income or any other performance measures derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP, or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of our profitability or liquidity.

We understand that, although adjusted revenues, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share are frequently used by securities analysts and others in their evaluation of companies, these measures have limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider them in isolation, or as a substitute for an analysis of our results as reported under U.S. GAAP. In particular you should consider:

•: Adjusted revenues, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

Table of Contents

•: Adjusted revenues, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
•: Adjusted revenues, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share do not reflect non-cash components of employee compensation;
•: Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized often will have to be replaced in the future, and adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;
•: Due to either net losses before income tax expenses or the use of federal and state net operating loss carryforwards in 2014, 2013 and 2012, we had cash income tax payments, net of refunds, of $2,131, $4,708 and $796 in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Income tax payments will be higher if we continue to generate taxable income and our existing net operating loss carryforwards for federal and state income taxes have been fully utilized or have expired; and
•: Other companies in our industry may calculate adjusted revenues, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as a comparative measure.

Management compensates for the inherent limitations associated with using adjusted revenues, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted operating income, adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share through disclosure of such limitations, presentation of our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and reconciliation of adjusted revenues to revenues, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure and adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share to net income and net income per share, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure. Further, our management also reviews U.S. GAAP measures and evaluates individual measures that are not included in some or all of our non-U.S. GAAP financial measures, such as our level of capital expenditures and interest income, among other measures.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of total revenues to adjusted revenues based on our historical results:

	Year Ended December 31,

	2014		2013		2012
	(in thousands)
Total revenues	$	348,748	$	242,535	$	157,266
Deferred revenue fair value adjustment		—		160		1,248

Adjusted revenues	$	348,748	$	242,695	$	158,514

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the reconciliation of net income to adjusted EBITDA based on our historical results:

	Year Ended December 31,

	2014			2013			2012
	(in thousands)
Net income	$	13,979		$	3,660		$	465
Add (deduct):
Deferred revenue fair value adjustment		—			160			1,248
Interest income		(139	)		(18	)		(29	)
Interest expense		626			—			3
Income tax provision		8,528			2,052			2,603
Depreciation and amortization		18,651			15,329			12,400
Non-cash compensation expense		11,423			8,919			4,037
Restructuring charges and transaction costs		2,672			3,297			2,718
Re-audit related expenses		—			3,110			—
Severance		735			790			278
Imputed interest expense on contingent consideration		1,472			787			—
Fair market value adjustment on contingent consideration		(1,432	)		501			—
Litigation related expense		18			7			265
Bad debt expense					—			—
Other income		(1,825	)		—			—
Pre-tax loss attributable to non-controlling interest		1,230			—			—

Adjusted EBITDA	$	55,938		$	38,594		$	23,988

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the reconciliation of net income to adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share based on our historical results:

	Year Ended December 31,

	2014*			2013*		2012*
	(in thousands)
Net income	$	13,979		$	3,660	$	465
Add (deduct):
Deferred revenue fair value adjustment		—			93		746
Non-cash interest expense		195			—		—
Non-cash compensation expense		6,854			5,173		2,414
Restructuring charges and transaction costs		2,025			2,252		1,810
Re-audit related expenses		—			1,804		—
Severance		440			458		166
Amortization of acquired intangibles		6,385			4,903		3,687
Imputed interest expense on contingent consideration		883			456		—
Fair market value adjustment on contingent consideration		(859	)		291		—
Litigation related expense		11			4		158
Other income		(1,095	)		—		1,124
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		719			—		—

Adjusted net income	$	29,537		$	19,094	$	10,570



Basic number of weighted-average shares outstanding		34,559,558			33,191,088		32,162,672
Effect of dilutive shares:
Options to purchase common stock		2,165,808			1,979,474		954,056
Common warrants		—			378,282		177,257
Restricted stock		152,233			117,731		47,630

Diluted number of weighted-average shares outstanding		36,877,599			35,666,575		33,341,615



Adjusted net income per share	$	0.80		$	0.54	$	0.32

*: Adjustments, excluding non-recurring tax items and non-deductible transaction costs, are tax-effected using income tax rates as follows: 40% for 2014, 42% for 2013, and 40.2% for 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2014, we had total cash and cash equivalents of $209,754, compared to $49,942 as of December 31, 2013. We plan to use existing cash as of December 31, 2014 and cash generated in the ongoing operations of our business to fund our current operations, capital expenditures and possible acquisitions or other strategic activity.

Table of Contents

Cash Flows

The following table presents information regarding our cash flows and cash and cash equivalents for the periods indicated:

	Year Ended December 31,

	2014			2013			2012
	(in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	55,997		$	28,857		$	28,548
Net cash used in investing activities		(69,129	)		(18,260	)		(69,714	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		172,944			9,362			6,240
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		159,812			19,959			(34,926	)
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		209,754			49,942			29,983

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities in 2014 increased by $27,140 compared to 2013, primarily due to an increase in net income of $10,319 in 2014 compared to the prior year period and an increase in the change in operating assets and liabilities totaling $18,559 offset by a decrease in non-cash adjustments totaling $2,364.

Net cash provided by operating activities in 2013 increased by $309 compared to 2012, primarily due to an increase in net income of $3,195 in 2013 compared to the prior year period and an increase in non-cash adjustments totaling $2,612, offset by an overall net decrease in the change in operating assets and liabilities of $5,498.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities in 2014 increased by $50,869 compared to 2013, primarily due to the increase in cash used in acquisitions of $50,578. In 2014, the Company acquired Placemark and Klein for net cash totaling $58,282 and $1,288, respectively, and in 2013, the Company acquired WMS for net cash totaling $8,992 (see Note 3 to the notes to consolidated financial statements).

Net cash used in investing activities in 2013 decreased by $51,454 compared to 2012. In 2013, the Company acquired WMS for net cash totaling $8,992 and in 2012, the Company acquired Prima and Tamarac for net cash totaling $62,352 (see Note 3 to the notes to consolidated financial statements). The decrease in cash used in acquisitions of $53,360 was offset by cash disbursements in 2013 and 2012 of $9,268 and $7,188, respectively, for purchases of property and equipment and capitalization of internally developed software.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities in 2014 increased by $163,582 compared to 2013, primarily a result of an increase in net proceeds from issuance of convertible debt of $166,967 and an increase in the excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $5,269, offset by an increase in payment of contingent consideration of $6,000, an increase in treasury stock purchases of $1,440 and an decrease in the proceeds from exercise of stock options of $1,210.

Net cash provided by financing activities in 2013 increased by $3,122 compared to 2012, primarily a result of an increase in the proceeds from exercise of stock options of $4,331 and an increase in the excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $2,030, offset by a decrease in the issuance of restricted stock of $2,759 and increase in treasury stock purchases of $485.

Table of Contents

Commitments

The following table sets forth information regarding our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2014:

	Payments Due by Period

	Total		Less than 1 year		1 - 3 years		3 - 5 years		More than 5 years
	(in thousands)
Operating leases(1)	$	56,674	$	6,651	$	14,452	$	12,660	$	22,911
Purchase obligations		3,688		2,864		824		—		—
Convertible notes coupon interest payments		15,100		3,020		6,040		6,040		—
Undrawn credit facility fees		825		275		550		—		—
Estimated undiscounted contingent consideration payments		15,390		7,357		8,033		—		—

Total	$	91,677	$	20,167	$	29,899	$	18,700	$	22,911

(1): We lease facilities under non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through 2026.

The table above does not reflect the following:

•: Amounts estimated for uncertain tax positions since the timing and likelihood of such payments cannot be reasonably estimated.
•: Convertible Notes in the principal amount of $172,500 mature in December 2019, unless earlier purchased or converted. The Convertible Notes may be settled in cash, common stock, or a combination thereof.
•: Voluntary employer matching contributions to our defined contribution benefit plans since the amount cannot be reasonably estimated. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, we made voluntary employer matching contributions of $1,176, $891 and $660, respectively.

The Company includes various types of indemnification and guarantee clauses in certain arrangements. These indemnifications and guarantees may include, but are not limited to, infringement claims related to intellectual property, direct or consequential damages and guarantees to certain service providers and service level requirements with certain customers. The type and amount of any potential indemnification or guarantee varies substantially based on the nature of each arrangement. The Company has experienced no previous claims and cannot determine the maximum amount of potential future payments, if any, related to such indemnification and guarantee provisions. The Company believes that it is unlikely it will have to make material payments under these arrangements and therefore has not recorded a contingent liability in the consolidated balance sheets.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Other than operating leases as indicated above, we do not have any other off-balance sheet arrangements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. Early application is not permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is evaluating the effect that

Table of Contents

ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk

Our exposure to market risk is directly related to revenues from asset management or administration earned based upon a contractual percentage of AUM or AUA. In the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, 84%, 83% and 81% of our revenues, respectively, were derived from revenues based on the market value of AUM or AUA. We expect this percentage to vary over time. A decrease in the aggregate value of AUM or AUA may cause our revenue and income to decline.

Foreign currency risk

The expenses of our India subsidiary, which primarily consist of expenditures related to compensation and benefits, are paid using the Indian Rupee. We are directly exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates through the translation of these monthly expenditures into U.S. dollars. As of December 31, 2014, we estimate that a hypothetical 10% increase in the value of the Indian Rupee to the U.S. dollar would result in a decrease of $981 to pre-tax earnings and a hypothetical 10% decrease in the value of the Indian Rupee to the U.S. dollar would result in an increase of $802 to pre-tax earnings.

Interest rate risk

We are subject to market risk from changes in interest rates. The Company has a revolving credit facility that bears interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin between 1.50 percent and 3.25 percent. As the LIBOR rates fluctuate, so too will the interest expense on amounts borrowed under the Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2014, no amounts were outstanding on the Credit Agreement. The Company incurred interest expense of $259 related to the Credit Agreement for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Envestnet, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Envestnet, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Envestnet, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 2, 2015 expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 2, 2015

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share information)

	December 31,

	2014			2013
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	209,754		$	49,942
Fees and other receivables, net		20,345			19,848
Deferred tax assets, net		4,654			2,462
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		7,242			7,155

Total current assets		241,995			79,407

Property and equipment, net		16,629			12,766
Internally developed software, net		7,023			5,740
Intangible assets, net		58,654			35,698
Goodwill		104,976			74,335
Deferred tax assets, net		565			8,367
Other non-current assets		9,516			4,929

Total assets	$	439,358		$	221,242



Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities:
Accrued expenses	$	48,247		$	35,242
Accounts payable		4,869			5,528
Contingent consideration		6,405			6,008
Deferred revenue		5,159			6,245

Total current liabilities		64,680			53,023

Convertible notes		145,203			—
Contingent consideration		7,462			11,297
Deferred revenue		6,954			1,148
Deferred rent		3,588			2,051
Lease incentive		5,550			3,547
Other non-current liabilities		2,430			2,404

Total liabilities		235,867			73,470

Commitments and contingencies
Redeemable units in ERS, LLC		1,500			—
Equity:
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.005, 50,000,000 shares authorized		—			—
Common stock, par value $0.005, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 46,345,376 and 45,628,814 shares issued as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively; 34,544,653 and 33,876,020 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		232			228
Additional paid-in capital		233,888			192,341
Accumulated deficit		(19,443	)		(33,617	)
Treasury stock at cost, 11,800,723 and 11,752,794 shares as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		(13,242	)		(11,180	)

Total stockholders' equity		201,435			147,772
Non-controlling interest		556			—

Total equity		201,991			147,772

Total liabilities and equity	$	439,358		$	221,242

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except share and per share information)

	Year ended December 31,

	2014			2013		2012
Revenues:
Assets under management or administration	$	294,223		$	200,568	$	127,213
Licensing and professional services		54,525			41,967		30,053

Total revenues		348,748			242,535		157,266

Operating expenses:
Cost of revenues		150,067			98,970		56,119
Compensation and benefits		104,457			77,442		54,973
General and administration		54,321			44,808		30,617
Depreciation and amortization		18,651			15,329		12,400
Restructuring charges		—			474		115

Total operating expenses		327,496			237,023		154,224

Income from operations		21,252			5,512		3,042
Other income:
Interest income		139			18		29
Interest expense		(626	)		—		(3	)
Other income, net		1,742			182		—

Total other income		1,255			200		26

Income before income tax provision		22,507			5,712		3,068
Income tax provision		8,528			2,052		2,603

Net and comprehensive income		13,979			3,660		465
Add: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		195			—		—

Net income attributable to Envestnet, Inc.	$	14,174		$	3,660	$	465



Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.41		$	0.11	$	0.01



Diluted	$	0.38		$	0.10	$	0.01



Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		34,559,558			33,191,088		32,162,672



Diluted		36,877,599			35,666,575		33,341,615

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

(in thousands, except share information)

					Treasury Stock

	Common Stock				Treasury Stock
	Common Stock				Common Shares						Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Non- controlling Interest			Total Equity
	Shares		Amount		Common Shares			Amount			Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Non- controlling Interest			Total Equity
Balance, December 31, 2011		43,515,899	$	218		(11,705,173	)	$	(10,421	)	$	163,584		$	(37,742	)	$	—		$	115,639
Exercise of stock options		298,947		1		—			—			2,068			—			—			2,069
Issuance of common stock:
vesting of restricted stock		24,568		—		—			—			—			—			—			—
issuance of restricted stock		232,150		1		—			—			2,758			—			—			2,759
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—			—			4,342			—			—			4,342
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—			—			1,549			—			—			1,549
Reversal of net operating loss tax benefit recognized from EnvestNet Group, Inc. merger		—		—		—			—			(690	)		—			—			(690	)
Purchase of treasury stock for stock-based minimum tax withholdings		—		—		(10,716	)		(137	)		—			—			—			(137	)
Net income		—		—		—			—			—			465			—			465

Balance, December 31, 2012		44,071,564	$	220		(11,715,889	)	$	(10,558	)	$	173,611		$	(37,277	)	$	—		$	125,996
Exercise of stock options		721,050		3		—			—			6,397			—			—			6,400
Issuance of common stock—vesting of restricted stock		74,298		1		—			—			—			—			—			1
Exercise of warrants		761,902		4		—			—			—			—			—			4
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—			—			8,738			—			—			8,738
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—			—			3,579			—			—			3,579
Reversal of state uncertain tax positions		—		—		—			—			16			—			—			16
Purchase of treasury stock for stock-based minimum tax withholdings		—		—		(36,905	)		(622	)		—			—			—			(622	)
Net income		—		—		—			—			—			3,660			—			3,660

Balance, December 31, 2013		45,628,814	$	228		(11,752,794	)	$	(11,180	)	$	192,341		$	(33,617	)	$	—		$	147,772
Exercise of stock options		573,298		3		—			—			5,187			—			—			5,190
Issuance of common stock—vesting of restricted stock		143,264		1		—			—			—			—			—			1
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—			—			11,228			—			195			11,423
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—			—			8,848			—			—			8,848
Purchase of treasury stock for stock-based minimum tax withholdings		—		—		(47,929	)		(2,062	)		—			—			—			(2,062	)
Issuance of membership interest in ERS, LLC		—		—		—			—			—			—			556			556
Issuance of convertible notes, net of tax and offering costs		—		—		—			—			16,284			—			—			16,284
Net income (loss)		—		—		—			—			—			14,174			(195	)		13,979

Balance, December 31, 2014		46,345,376	$	232		(11,800,723	)	$	(13,242	)	$	233,888		$	(19,443	)	$	556		$	201,991

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

	Year ended December 31,

	2014			2013			2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	13,979		$	3,660		$	465
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		18,651			15,329			12,400
Deferred rent and lease incentive		275			(483	)		1,389
Provision for doubtful accounts		15			203			—
Impairment of long-lived assets		—			330			—
Deferred income taxes		(4,640	)		(2,546	)		83
Stock-based compensation		11,423			8,738			4,342
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		(8,848	)		(3,579	)		(1,549	)
Interest expense		626			—			—
Accretion on contingent consideration		1,472			787			3
Fair market value adjustment on contingent consideration		(1,432	)		501			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Fees receivable		1,788			(9,566	)		1,017
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		9,733			(1,075	)		4,645
Other non-current assets		(873	)		(1,444	)		(181	)
Accrued expenses		9,784			12,389			3,100
Accounts payable		(659	)		2,914			640
Deferred revenue		4,677			1,625			1,028
Other non-current liabilities		26			1,074			1,166

Net cash provided by operating activities		55,997			28,857			28,548

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment		(6,177	)		(6,125	)		(4,838	)
Capitalization of internally developed software		(3,382	)		(3,143	)		(2,350	)
Repayment of notes payable assumed in acquisition		—			—			(174	)
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired		(59,570	)		(8,992	)		(62,352	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(69,129	)		(18,260	)		(69,714	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes		172,500			—			—
Convertible notes issuance costs		(5,533	)		—			—
Proceeds from bank indebtedness		30,000			—			—
Payment of bank indebtedness		(30,000	)		—			—
Payment of contingent consideration		(6,000	)		—			—
Payment of promissory note		(1,500	)		—			—
Issuance of redeemable units in ERS		1,500			—			—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		5,190			6,400			2,069
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation expense		8,848			3,579			1,549
Purchase of treasury stock		(2,062	)		(622	)		(137	)
Issuance of restricted stock		1			1			2,759
Proceeds from exercise of warrants		—			4			—

Net cash provided by financing activities		172,944			9,362			6,240

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		159,812			19,959			(34,926	)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		49,942			29,983			64,909

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	209,754		$	49,942		$	29,983



Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information—cash paid during the period for income taxes, net of refunds	$	2,131		$	4,708		$	796
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information—cash paid during the period for interest		299			—			—
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash operating, investing and financing activities:
Settlement of contingent consideration liability upon issuance of ERS, LLC membership interest		158			—			—
Contingent consideration issued in a business acquisition		2,800			16,017			—
Issuance of promissory note for acquisition		1,500			—			—
Leasehold improvements funded by lease incentive		2,865			1,693			1,054

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

1. Organization and Description of Business

Envestnet, Inc. ("Envestnet") and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") provide open-architecture wealth management services and technology to independent financial advisors and financial institutions. These services and related technology are provided via Envestnet's wealth management software, Envestnet | PMC®, Envestnet | Tamarac™, Vantage Reporting Solution™, Envestnet | WMS™ and Envestnet | Placemark™.

Envestnet's wealth management software is a platform of integrated, internet-based technology applications and related services that provide portfolio diagnostics, proposal generation, investment model management, rebalancing and trading, portfolio performance reporting and monitoring solutions, billing, and back-office and middle-office operations and administration.

The Company's investment consulting group, Envestnet | PMC, provides investment manager due diligence and research, a full spectrum of investment offerings supported by both proprietary and third-party research and manager selection, and overlay portfolio management services.

Envestnet | Tamarac provides leading portfolio accounting, rebalancing, trading, performance reporting and client relationship management software, principally to high-end Registered Investment Advisors ("RIAs").

Vantage Reporting Solution software aggregates and manages investment data, provides performance reporting and benchmarking, giving advisors an in-depth view of clients' various investments, empowering advisors to give holistic, personalized advice.

Envestnet | WMS offers financial institutions access to an integrated wealth platform, which helps construct and manage sophisticated portfolio solutions across an entire account life cycle, particularly in the area of unified managed account trading. Envestnet | WMS's Overlay Portfolio Management console helps wealth managers efficiently build customized client portfolios that consider both proprietary and open-architecture investment solutions.

Envestnet | Placemark develops unified managed account ("UMA") programs and other portfolio management outsourcing solutions, including patented portfolio overlay and tax optimization services, for banks, full service broker-dealers and RIA firms.

Through these platforms and service offerings, the Company provides open-architecture support for a wide range of investment products (separately managed accounts, multi-manager accounts, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, stock baskets, alternative investments, and other fee-based investment solutions) from Envestnet | PMC and other leading investment providers via multiple custodians, and also account administration and reporting services.

Envestnet operates five RIAs and a registered broker-dealer. The RIAs are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The broker-dealer is registered with the SEC, all 50 states and the District of Columbia and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA").

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The Company follows accounting standards established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") to ensure consistent reporting of financial condition, results of operations and cash

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

flows. References to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") in these footnotes are to the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM, sometimes referred to as the codification or ASC.

Principles of Consolidation—The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Envestnet and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Accounts denominated in a non-U.S. currency have been re-measured using the U.S. dollar as the functional currency.

Management Estimates—Management of the Company has made certain estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates relate to estimating uncollectible receivables, revenue recognition, costs capitalized for internally developed software, valuations and assumptions used for impairment testing of goodwill, intangible and other long-lived assets, fair value of restricted stock and stock options issued, fair value of customer inducement assets and liabilities, fair value of contingent consideration, realization of deferred tax assets, uncertain tax positions, fair value of the liability portion of the convertible debt and assumptions used to allocate purchase prices in business combinations. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Revenue Recognition—The Company recognizes revenue from services related to asset management and administration, licensing and professional services fees. The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following conditions are satisfied: (i) there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, (ii) the service or product has been provided to the customer and no uncertainties exist surrounding product acceptances (iii) the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) the collection of fees is reasonably assured.

•: Asset management and administration fees—The Company derives revenues from fees charged as a percentage of the assets that are managed or administered on its technology platforms by financial advisors, financial institutions, and their clients (collectively "customers") and for services the Company provides to its customers. Such services include investment manager due diligence and research, portfolio diagnostics, proposal generation, investment model management, rebalancing and trading, portfolio performance reporting and monitoring solutions, billing, and back office and middle-office operations and administration. Investment decisions for assets under management or administration are made by our customers. The asset management and administration fees the Company earns are generally based upon a contractual percentage of assets managed or administered on our platforms based on preceding quarter-end values. The contractual fee percentages vary based on the level and type of services the Company provides to its customers. Fees related to assets under management or administration increase or decrease based on values of existing customer accounts. The values are affected by inflows or outflows of customer funds and market fluctuations.
•: Licensing and professional services fees—

Licensing—The Company derives licensing fees from recurring contractual fixed fee contracts with larger financial institutions or enterprise clients. Licensing contracts allow the

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

customer to provide a unique configuration of platform features and investment solutions for their advisors. The licensing fees vary based on the type of services provided and our revenues received under license agreements are recognized over the contractual term. The Company's license agreements do not generally provide its customers the ability to take possession of the software or host the software on the customers' own systems or through a hosting arrangement with an unrelated party.

Professional services—The Company derives professional service fees from providing contractual customized service platform software development, which are recognized under a proportional-performance model utilizing an output-based approach. The Company's contracts generally have fixed prices, and generally specify or quantify deliverables.

Cash received by the Company in advance of the performance of services is deferred and recognized as revenue when earned. Certain portions of the Company's revenues require management's consideration of the nature of the client relationship in determining whether to recognize as revenue the gross amount billed or net amount retained after payments are made to providers for certain services related to the product or service offering.

The Company uses the following factors to determine whether to record revenue on a gross or net basis:

•: the Company has a direct contract with the third party service provider;

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

•: the Company has discretion in establishing fees paid by the customer and fees due to the third party service provider; and
•: the Company has credit risk

When customer fees include charges for third party service providers where the Company has a direct contract with such third party service providers, gross revenue recognized by the Company equals the fee paid by the customer. The cost of revenues recognized by the Company is the amount due to the third party service provider.

In instances where the Company does not have a direct contract with the third party service provider, the Company cannot exercise discretion in establishing fees paid by the customer and fees due to the third party service provider, and the Company does not have credit risk, the Company records the revenue on a net basis.

Deferred Revenue—Deferred revenue primarily consists of implementation and set up fees, professional services, and license fee payments received in advance from customers.

Cost of Revenues—Cost of revenues primarily include expenses related to third party investment management and clearing, custody and brokerage services. Generally, these expenses are calculated based upon a contractual percentage of the market value of assets held in customer accounts measured as of the end of each quarter and are recognized ratably throughout the quarter based on the number of days in the quarter.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—The Company evaluates the need for an allowance for doubtful accounts for potentially uncollectible fees receivable. In establishing the amount of the allowance, if any, customer-specific information is considered related to delinquent accounts, including historical loss experience and current economic conditions. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company's allowance for doubtful accounts was $76 and $203, respectively. The following table summarizes the changes to the allowance for doubtful accounts:

	2014			2013

Balance, beginning of year	$	203		$	—
Add: Provision for doubtful accounts		15			203
Less: Write-offs		(142	)		—

Balance, end of year	$	76		$	203

Segments—The Company's chief operating decision maker is its chief executive officer, who reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis. Historically, the Company has determined that it has a single reporting segment and operating unit structure. As a result of the acquisitions as discussed in Note 3, the Company has re-examined its reporting and operating structure and has determined it continues to maintain a single reporting segment and operating unit structure.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments—The carrying amounts of financial instruments, net of any allowances, including cash equivalents, fees receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses are considered to be reasonable estimates of their fair values due to their short-term nature.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Cash and Cash Equivalents—The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. The Company's financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash accounts at financial institutions in excess of amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"). The Company monitors such credit risk and has not experienced any losses related to such risk.

Investments—Investments are recorded at cost and reviewed for impairment. Investments are included in "Other non-current assets" on the consolidated balance sheets and consist of non-marketable investments in privately held companies, as well as other alternative investments. The Company reviews these investments on a regular basis to evaluate the carrying amount and economic viability of these investments. This policy includes, but is not limited to, reviewing each of the investee's cash position, financing needs, earnings/revenue outlook, operational performance, management/ownership changes and competition. The evaluation process is based on information that the Company requests from these investees. This information is not subject to the same disclosure regulations as U.S. publicly traded companies, and as such, the basis for these evaluations is subject to the timing and accuracy of the data received from these investees.

The Company's investments are assessed for impairment when a review of the investee's operations indicates that there is a decline in value of the investment and the decline is other than temporary. Such indicators include, but are not limited to, limited capital resources, limited prospects of receiving additional financing, and prospects for liquidity of the related securities. Impaired investments are written down to estimated fair value. The Company estimates fair value using a variety of valuation methodologies, including comparing the investee with publicly traded companies in similar lines of business, applying valuation multiples to estimated future operating results and estimated discounted future cash flows. There were impairments to investments of $0, $47 and $0 during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Property and Equipment—Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation of furniture and equipment is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of the depreciable assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic useful lives or the remaining lease term, whichever is shorter. Improvements are capitalized, while repairs and maintenance costs are charged to operations as incurred. Assets are reviewed for recoverability whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.

Internally Developed Software—Costs incurred in the preliminary stages of development are expensed as incurred. Once an application has reached the development stage, internal and external costs, if direct and incremental, are capitalized until the software is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. Capitalization ceases upon completion of all substantial testing. The Company also capitalizes costs related to specific upgrades and enhancements when it is probable the expenditures will result in additional functionality. Maintenance and training costs are expensed as incurred. Internally developed software is amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life. Management evaluates the useful lives of these assets on an annual basis and tests for impairment

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

whenever events or changes in circumstances occur that could impact the recoverability of these assets. There were no impairments of internally developed software during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets—Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment each year using a two-step process that is performed at least annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. The Company has concluded that it has a single reporting unit. The first step is a comparison of the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired and the second step is unnecessary. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second test is performed to measure the amount of impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the goodwill to a determination of the implied fair value of the goodwill. If the carrying amount of the goodwill is greater than the implied value, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. The implied value of the goodwill is determined as of the test date by performing a purchase price allocation, as if the reporting unit had just been acquired, using currently estimated fair values of the individual assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, together with an estimate of the fair value of the reporting unit taken as a whole. The estimate of the fair value of the reporting unit is based upon information available regarding prices of similar groups of assets, or other valuation techniques including present value techniques based upon estimates of future cash flows. No impairment charges have been recorded for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

Intangible assets are recorded at cost less accumulated amortization. Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances may affect the recoverability of the net assets. Such reviews include an analysis of current results and take into consideration the undiscounted value of projected operating cash flows.

Long-Lived Assets—Long-lived assets, such as property, equipment, capitalized internal use software and intangible assets subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset group. All long-lived assets of the Company are located in the U.S., except for approximately $1,503 and $997 as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which are located in India.

Management evaluates the useful lives of these assets on an annual basis and tests for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances occur that could impact recoverability of these assets. There were impairments to long-lived assets of $0, $283 and $0 during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Leases—In certain circumstances, the Company enters into leases with free rent periods, rent escalations or lease incentives over the term of the lease. In such cases, the Company calculates the total payments over the term of the lease and records them ratably as rent expense over that term.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Income Taxes—The Company uses the asset and liability method to account for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and net operating loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized.

The Company follows authoritative guidance related to how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, disclosed and presented in the consolidated financial statements. This requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Company's tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained "when challenged" or "when examined" by the applicable tax authority. The tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from tax positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

Advertising Costs—The Company expenses all advertising costs as incurred and they are classified within general and administration expenses. Advertising costs totaled approximately $675, $1,028 and $1,504 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Research and Development—The Company intends to continue to invest in its technology platforms and software and service offerings to provide financial advisors with access to investment solutions and services that address the widest range of financial advisors' front-, middle-and back-office needs. In the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, our technology development expenses totaled $8,178, $5,998, and $6,309, respectively, exclusive of capitalization of internally developed software and related amortization.

Business Combinations—The Company accounts for business combinations under the acquisition method. The cost of an acquired company is assigned to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed on the basis of their fair values at the date of acquisition. The determination of fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management to make estimates and use valuation techniques when market values are not readily available. Any excess of purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired is allocated to goodwill. Transaction costs associated with business combinations are expensed as incurred. The Company determines the fair value of contingent acquisition consideration payable on the acquisition date using a discounted cash flow approach utilizing an appropriate discount rate. Each reporting period thereafter, the Company revalues these obligations and records increases or decreases in their fair value as adjustments to fair market value adjustment on contingent consideration in the Company's consolidated statements of operations. Changes in the fair value of the contingent acquisition consideration payable can result from adjustments to the estimated revenue forecasts included in the contingent payment calculations.

Stock-Based Compensation—Compensation cost relating to stock-based awards made to employees and directors is recognized in the consolidated financial statements using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model in the case of non-qualified stock option awards, and intrinsic value in the case of

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

restricted stock awards. The Company measures the cost of such awards based on the estimated fair value of the award measured at the grant date and recognizes the expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period.

Determining the fair value of stock options requires the Company to make several estimates, including the volatility of its stock price, the expected life of the option, forfeiture rate, dividend yield and interest rates. Prior to July 28, 2010, the Company was not a publicly traded company. Accordingly, the Company had limited historical information on the price of its stock as well as employees' stock option exercise behavior. Because of this limitation, the Company cannot rely on its historical experience alone to develop assumptions for stock-price volatility and the expected life of its options. The Company estimates the expected life of its options using the "Simplified Method." The Company estimates stock-price volatility with reference to a peer group of publicly traded companies. Determining the companies to include in this peer group involves judgment. The Company utilizes a risk-free interest rate, which is based on the yield of U.S. zero coupon securities with a maturity equal to the expected life of the options. The Company has not and does not expect to pay dividends on its common shares.

The Company is required to estimate expected forfeitures of stock-based awards at the grant date and recognize compensation cost only for those awards expected to vest. The forfeiture assumption is ultimately adjusted to the actual forfeiture rate. Therefore, changes in the forfeiture assumptions may impact the total amount of expense ultimately recognized over the vesting period. Estimated forfeitures will be reassessed in subsequent periods and may change based on new facts and circumstances.

Convertible Notes—On December 15, 2014, the Company issued $172,500 of 1.75% convertible notes due December 2019 (the "Convertible Notes"). The Convertible Notes are accounted for in accordance with ASC 470-20. The Company has determined that the embedded conversion options in the Convertible Notes are not required to be separately accounted for as a derivative under GAAP. The Company separately accounts for the liability and equity components of the Convertible Notes that can be settled in cash by allocating the proceeds from issuance between the liability component and the embedded conversion option, or equity component, in accordance with accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash (including partial cash settlement) upon conversion. The value of the equity component is calculated by first measuring the fair value of the liability component, using the interest rate of a similar liability that does not have a conversion feature, as of the issuance date. The difference between the proceeds from the convertible debt issuance and the amount measured as the liability component is recorded as the equity component with a corresponding discount recorded on the debt. The Company recognizes the accretion of the resulting discount using the effective-interest method as part of interest expense in its consolidated statements of operations.

Other Income—On June 18, 2014, the Company reached an agreement with a vendor regarding the recovery of certain expenses the Company incurred in 2013. Under the terms of the agreement, the vendor agreed to pay the Company $1,825. The Company recognized a pre-tax gain of $1,825 resulting from the agreement, which is included in other income, net in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Non-controlling Interest—Effective February 1, 2014, the Company formed Envestnet Retirement Solutions, LLC ("ERS, LLC") with various third parties. ERS, LLC offers advisory and technology enabled services to financial advisors and retirement plans. In exchange for a 64.5% ownership interest in ERS, LLC, the Company contributed certain assets and has agreed to fund a certain amount of the operating expenses of ERS, LLC. As described in Note 3, due to the issuance of units related to the acquisition of Klein Decisions, Inc. ("Klein") the Company's ownership in ERS, LLC is 57% as of December 31, 2014.

The allocation of gains and losses to the members of ERS, LLC is based on a hypothetical liquidation book value method in accordance with the ERS, LLC operating agreement. In the year ended December 31, 2014, losses of $195 are reflected as non-controlling interest in the consolidated statements of operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements—On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. Early application is not permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.

3. Business Acquisitions

Prima Capital Holding, Inc.

On April 5, 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of Prima Capital Holding, Inc. ("Prima"). In accordance with the stock purchase agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Prima for total consideration of approximately $13,925. Prima provides investment management due diligence, research applications, asset allocation modeling and multi-manager portfolios to the wealth management and retirement industries. Prima's clientele includes banks, independent RIAs, regional broker-dealers, family offices and trust companies. The goodwill arising from the acquisition represents the expected synergistic benefits of the transaction and the knowledge and experience of the workforce in place. The goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes.

The consideration transferred in the acquisition was as follows:


Cash paid to owners	$	13,750
Cash acquired		(1,767	)
Cash paid for working capital settlement		1,942

	$	13,925

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

3. Business Acquisitions (Continued)

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:


Total tangible assets acquired	$	2,399
Total liabilities assumed		(2,697	)
Identifiable intangible assets		4,940
Goodwill		9,283

Total net assets acquired	$	13,925

A summary of intangible assets acquired, estimated useful lives and amortization method is as follows:

	Amount			Amortization Method

Customer list	$	3,740	10	Accelerated
Proprietary technology		700	5	Accelerated
Trade names		500	5	Accelerated

Total	$	4,940

The results of Prima's operations are included in the consolidated statements of operations beginning April 5, 2012. Prima's revenues and pre-tax loss for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 totaled $3,626 and ($791), respectively. The loss for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 included acquired intangible asset amortization of $1,005.

Tamarac, Inc.

On May 1, 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of Tamarac, Inc. ("Tamarac"). In accordance with the merger agreement, a newly formed subsidiary of Envestnet merged with and into Tamarac, and Tamarac became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Envestnet. Under the terms of the merger agreement, total consideration was approximately $48,427 for all of the outstanding stock of Tamarac. Tamarac provides leading portfolio accounting, rebalancing, trading, performance reporting and client relationship management software, principally to high-end RIAs. The goodwill arising from the acquisition represents the expected synergistic benefits of the transaction and the knowledge and experience of the workforce in place. The goodwill recognized is not deductible for income tax purposes.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

3. Business Acquisitions (Continued)

The consideration transferred in the acquisition was as follows:


Cash paid to owners	$	54,000
Non-cash consideration		101
Cash acquired		(2,533	)
Receivable from working capital settlement		(3,141	)

	$	48,427

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.


Total tangible assets acquired	$	9,444
Total liabilities assumed		(12,194	)
Identifiable intangible assets		16,150
Goodwill		35,027

Total net assets acquired	$	48,427

A summary of intangible assets acquired, estimated useful lives and amortization method is as follows:

	Amount			Amortization Method

Customer list	$	8,680	12	Accelerated
Proprietary technology		5,880	8	Accelerated
Trade names		1,590	5	Accelerated

Total	$	16,150

The results of Tamarac's operations are included in the consolidated statements of operations beginning May 1, 2012. Tamarac's revenues and pre-tax loss for the eight-month period ended December 31, 2012 totaled $9,971 and ($1,236), respectively. The loss for the eight months ended December 31, 2012 included acquired intangible asset amortization of $1,304.

In accordance with the terms of the merger agreement between Envestnet and Tamarac, Tamarac senior management was required to apply at least 50% (up to 100%) of the aggregate proceeds of the Tamarac change of control payment totaling $2,759 to purchase registered shares of Envestnet common stock (232,150 shares) in an amount equal to 95% multiplied by the Envestnet closing market price on the day before the merger closed (see Note 12).

In addition, the Company adopted the Envestnet, Inc. Management Incentive Plan for Envestnet | Tamarac Management Employees (the "2012 Plan"). The 2012 Plan provides for the grant of up to 559,551 shares of unvested common stock. The unvested common stock vests based upon Tamarac meeting certain performance conditions and then a subsequent two-year service condition (see Note 13). The Company also granted to certain Tamarac employees 232,150 stock options to acquire

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

3. Business Acquisitions (Continued)

Envestnet common stock at an exercise price of $12.51. These stock options vest on the second anniversary of the grant date (see Note 13).

Wealth Management Solutions

On July 1, 2013, the Company acquired the Wealth Management Solutions ("WMS") division of Prudential Investments LLC. In accordance with the purchase agreement, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of WMS for total consideration of $24,730. WMS is a provider of technology solutions that enables financial services firms to develop and enhance their wealth management offerings. The Company acquired WMS to better serve the wealth management needs of the bank channel, deepen the Company's practice management capabilities, and benefit from the operational leverage resulting from consolidating WMS's business onto the Company's unified wealth management platform.

The goodwill arising from the acquisition represents the expected synergistic benefits of the transaction, primarily related to an increase in future revenues as a result of potential cross selling opportunities, as well as lower future operating expenses, including a reduction in headcount from pre-acquisition levels and lower technology platform-related costs due to the migration of WMS's clients to the Company's platform. The goodwill is also related to the knowledge and experience of the workforce in place.

The consideration in the acquisition was as follows:


Cash paid to owners	$	8,992
Contingent consideration		15,738

	$	24,730

In connection with the acquisition of WMS, the Company is required to pay Prudential Investments contingent consideration of $6,000 per year for three years, based upon WMS's annualized net revenue relative to a target of $28,000 per year, with lower payments for performance below the target and higher payments for performance above the target, subject to an aggregate maximum of $23,000. The Company recorded a liability as of the date of acquisition of $15,738, which represented the estimated fair value of contingent consideration on the date of acquisition and is considered a Level 3 fair value measurement as described in Note 8.

The estimated fair value of contingent consideration as of December 31, 2014 was $11,667. This amount is the present value of an undiscounted liability of $12,750, applying a discount rate of 10%. Payments will be made at the end of three twelve month closing periods. The first undiscounted payment of $6,000 was paid on August 12, 2014. The second and third undiscounted payments are anticipated to be $7,102 on August 15, 2015 and $5,648 on August 15, 2016. Changes to the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration are recognized in earnings of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded a fair value adjustment to decrease the contingent consideration liability by $1,231 as a result of a decrease in the revenue assumptions for years 2 and 3. This adjustment is included in general and administration expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

3. Business Acquisitions (Continued)

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:


Total tangible assets acquired	$	1,296
Total liabilities assumed		(2,257	)
Identifiable intangible assets		17,000
Goodwill		8,691

Total net assets acquired	$	24,730

A summary of intangible assets acquired, estimated useful lives and amortization method is as follows:

	Amount			Amortization Method

Customer list	$	14,000	12	Accelerated
Proprietary technology		3,000	1.5	Accelerated

Total	$	17,000

The results of WMS operations are included in the consolidated statement of operations beginning July 1, 2013. WMS's revenues and pre-tax loss for the six-month period ended December 31, 2013 totaled $33,517 and ($1,056), respectively. The loss includes acquired intangible asset amortization of $2,164, imputed interest expense on contingent consideration of $787 and an estimated fair value adjustment on contingent consideration of $501.

Klein Decisions, Inc.

On July 1, 2014, ERS, LLC completed the acquisition of Klein Decisions, Inc. ("Klein"). In accordance with the stock purchase agreement, ERS, LLC acquired all of the outstanding shares of Klein for cash consideration of approximately $1,288, a promissory note in the amount of $1,500, and estimated fair value of $2,800 in contingent consideration (with a minimum guaranteed amount of $1,175), to be paid over three years. The promissory note was paid by ERS, LLC on July 31, 2014. Klein develops dynamic decision systems that incorporate investor preferences, goals, and priorities into the investment process. ERS, LLC acquired Klein for its capabilities in delivering personal participant solutions, as well as its personnel to further build out ERS's business of serving advisors who support the small retirement plan market. The goodwill arising from the acquisition represents the expected synergistic benefits of the transaction, which relate to an increase in future ERS, LLC revenues as a result of leveraging Klein's systems and expertise of its employees. The goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

3. Business Acquisitions (Continued)

The consideration in the acquisition was as follows:


Cash paid to owners	$	1,288
Promissory note		1,500
Contingent consideration		2,800

	$	5,588

The contingent consideration liability of $2,800 is the present value of an undiscounted liability of $3,520, applying a discount rate of 9% and is considered a Level 3 fair value measurement as described in Note 8. Payments will be made at the end of three twelve month closing periods. The future undiscounted payments are anticipated to be $332 on July 31, 2015, $906 on July 31, 2016, and $2,282 on July 31, 2017. Changes to the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration are recognized in earnings of the Company.

For the six-month period ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized imputed interest expense on contingent consideration of $75 and an estimated decrease in the fair value of contingent consideration of $675, which are included in general and administration expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:


Total tangible assets acquired	$	53
Total liabilities assumed		(396	)
Identifiable intangible assets		2,900
Goodwill		3,031

Total net assets acquired	$	5,588

A summary of intangible assets acquired, estimated useful lives and amortization method is as follows:

	Amount			Amortization Method

Customer list	$	2,200	10	Accelerated
Proprietary technology		700	3	Straight-line

Total	$	2,900

The results of Klein's operations are included in the consolidated statement of operations beginning July 1, 2014. Klein's revenues and pre-tax loss for the six-month period ended December 31, 2014 totaled $468 and ($926), respectively. The loss includes acquired intangible asset amortization of $286, imputed interest expense on contingent consideration of $75 and an estimated fair value adjustment to decrease the contingent consideration liability by $675.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

3. Business Acquisitions (Continued)

On July 9, 2014, the former owners of Klein (the "Klein Parties") purchased an 11.7% ownership interest in ERS, LLC for $1,500. The Klein Parties have the right to require ERS, LLC to repurchase units issued anytime between 18 and approximately 36 months after July 1, 2014 for the amount of $1,500. This purchase obligation is guaranteed by the Company and is reflected outside of permanent equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. After taking into account the purchase of the Klein Parties, the Company's ownership interest in ERS, LLC is 57%.

Placemark Holdings, Inc.

On October 1, 2014, Envestnet, Inc. completed the acquisition (the "Acquisition") of Placemark Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Placemark"). Under the terms of the Acquisition, total consideration was $58,282 for all of the outstanding capital stock of Placemark. Envestnet funded the Acquisition with available cash and borrowings under its Credit Agreement (see Note 11).

Placemark develops UMA programs and other portfolio management outsourcing solutions, including patented portfolio overlay and tax optimization services, for banks, full-service broker-dealers and RIA firms. Envestnet acquired Placemark for its UMA and overlay capabilities, to strengthen the Company's position as a leading provider of UMA offerings, and to expand its presence in the full-service broker-dealer and RIA markets. The goodwill arising from the acquisition represents the expected synergistic benefits of the transaction, which relate to an increase in future Envestnet revenues as a result of leveraging Placemark's systems and expertise of its employees, and lower future operating expenses and technology platform-related costs due to the migration of Placemark's clients to the Company's platform. The goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes.

The consideration in the acquisition was as follows:


Cash paid to owners	$	66,000
Cash acquired		(8,419	)
Receivable from working capital settlement		701

	$	58,282

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:


Total tangible assets acquired	$	4,323
Total liabilities assumed		(3,118	)
Identifiable intangible assets		30,000
Goodwill		27,077

Total net assets acquired	$	58,282

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

3. Business Acquisitions (Continued)

A summary of intangible assets acquired, estimated useful lives and amortization method is as follows:

	Amount			Amortization Method

Customer list	$	24,000	11	Accelerated
Proprietary technology		5,000	5	Straight-line
Trade names		1,000	5	Straight-line

Total	$	30,000

The results of Placemark's operations are included in the consolidated statement of operations beginning October 1, 2014. Placemark's revenues and pre-tax income for the three-month period ended December 31, 2014 totaled $6,157 and $209, respectively. The loss includes acquired intangible asset amortization of $1,254.

Acquisition related costs of $2,430, $946 and $2,317 are included in general and administration expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Pro forma results for Envestnet, Inc. giving effect to the WMS and Placemark acquisitions

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations of Envestnet and Placemark for the year ended December 31, 2014 and Envestnet, WMS, and Placemark for the year ended December 31, 2013. The unaudited pro forma financial information presents the results as if the acquisitions had occurred as of the beginning of 2013. The results of Klein are not included in the pro forma financial information presented below as the Klein acquisition was not material to the Company's results of operations.

The unaudited pro forma results presented include amortization charges for acquired intangible assets and stock-based compensation expense, and the elimination of intercompany transactions, imputed interest expense, and transaction-related expenses and the related tax effect on the aforementioned items.

Pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisitions had taken place as of the beginning of 2013.

	At December 31,

	2014		2013
Revenues	$	366,164	$	292,975
Net income (loss)		12,290		(4,585	)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic		0.36		(0.14	)
Diluted		0.33		(0.14	)

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

3. Business Acquisitions (Continued)

Subsequent event

On February 24, 2015, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with the shareholders of Upside Holdings, Inc. ("Upside") to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Upside for cash consideration of approximately $3,040, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. Upside is a technology company providing digital advice solutions to financial advisors.

4. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of the following:

		December 31,

	Estimated Useful Life	2014			2013
Cost:
Office furniture and fixtures	5 - 7 years	$	4,993		$	4,266
Computer equipment and software	3 years		18,540			26,910
Other office equipment	5 years		144			598
Leasehold improvements	Shorter of the lease term or useful life of the asset		10,805			8,299

			34,482			40,073
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization			(17,853	)		(27,307	)

Property and equipment, net		$	16,629		$	12,766

During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company retired fully depreciated property and equipment that were no longer in service in the amount of $18,207. See below for the cost amounts and related accumulated depreciation written off by category:

	Cost		Accumulated Depreciation

Office furniture and fixtures	$	721	$	(721	)
Computer equipment and software		15,455		(15,455	)
Other office equipment		596		(596	)
Leasehold improvements		1,435		(1,435	)

Total property and equipment retirements	$	18,207	$	(18,207	)

Depreciation and amortization expense was as follows:

	Year ended December 31,

	2014		2013		2012
Depreciation and amortization expense	$	5,910	$	5,151	$	4,685

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

5. Internally Developed Software

Internally developed software consists of the following:

		December 31,

	Estimated Useful Life	December 31,
	Estimated Useful Life	2014			2013
Internally developed software	5 years	$	19,577		$	16,374
Less accumulated amortization			(12,554	)		(10,634	)

Internally developed software, net		$	7,023		$	5,740

Amortization expense was as follows:

	Year ended December 31,

	2014		2013		2012
Amortization expense	$	1,920	$	1,726	$	1,550

6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:


Balance at December 31, 2012	$	65,644
WMS acquisition		8,691

Balance at December 31, 2013		74,335
Klein acquisition		3,031
Placemark acquisition		27,077
Other		533

Balance at December 31, 2014	$	104,976

Intangible assets consist of the following:

		December 31, 2014							December 31, 2013

	Useful Life	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
Customer lists	4 - 12 years	$	68,603	$	(21,699	)	$	46,904	$	42,103	$	(14,593	)	$	27,510
Proprietary technologies	1.5 - 8 years		15,678		(5,808	)		9,870		9,580		(2,792	)		6,788
Trade names	5 years		3,090		(1,210	)		1,880		2,090		(690	)		1,400

Total intangible assets		$	87,371	$	(28,717	)	$	58,654	$	53,773	$	(18,075	)	$	35,698

Amortization expense was as follows:

	Year ended December 31,

	2014		2013		2012
Amortization expense	$	10,642	$	8,452	$	6,165

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Continued)

Future amortization expense of the intangible assets as of December 31, 2014, is expected to be as follows:


Years ending December 31:
2015	$	12,335
2016		10,443
2017		8,618
2018		7,319
2019		5,416
Thereafter		14,523

	$	58,654

7. Other Non-Current Assets

Other non-current assets consist of the following:

	December 31,

	2014		2013
Investment in private company	$	1,250	$	1,250
Deposits:
Lease		1,811		1,751
Other		436		286
Unamortized convertible debt issuance costs		4,612		—
Other		1,407		1,642

	$	9,516	$	4,929

The Company owns 1,250,000 Preferred A Units in a privately held company at a historical purchase price of $1,250. The Preferred A Units are entitled to a preferred distribution at a cumulative rate of 8% per annum of unreturned capital contributions, as defined in the agreement. See Note 11 for more information on the unamortized convertible debt issuance costs.

8. Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows ASC 825-10, Financial Instruments, which provides companies the option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. ASC 825-10 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities and to more easily understand the effect of the company's choice to use fair value on its earnings. ASC 825-10 also requires entities to display the fair value of the selected assets and liabilities on the face of the balance sheet. The Company has not elected the ASC 825-10 option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

8. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon a fair value hierarchy established by U.S. GAAP, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into the following levels:


Level 1:		Inputs based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.
Level 2:		Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or inputs that are observable and can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3:		Inputs reflect management's best estimates and assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the valuation of the instruments.

Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:

The Company periodically invests excess cash in money-market funds not insured by the FDIC. The Company believes that the investments in money market funds are on deposit with creditworthy financial institutions and that the funds are highly liquid. The fair values of the Company's investments in money-market funds are based on the daily quoted market prices for the net asset value of the various money market funds. These money-market funds are considered Level 1 assets and totaled approximately $70,760 and $32,358 as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and are included in cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated balance sheets.

The fair value of the contingent consideration liability related to the WMS acquisition on July 1, 2013 was estimated using a discounted cash flow method with significant inputs that are not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 fair value measurement as defined in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The significant inputs in the Level 3 measurement not supported by market activity included our assessments of expected future cash flows related to our acquisition of WMS during the subsequent three years from the date of acquisition, appropriately discounted considering the uncertainties associated with the obligation, and calculated in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

The Company utilized a discounted cash flow method with expected future performance of WMS, and its ability to meet the target performance objectives as the main driver of the valuation, to arrive at the fair value of the contingent consideration. The Company will continue to reassess the fair value of the contingent consideration at each reporting date until settlement. Changes to the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration will be recognized in earnings of the Company.

The fair value of the contingent consideration liability related to the Klein acquisition on July 1, 2014 was estimated using a discounted cash flow method with significant inputs that are not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 fair value measurement as defined in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The significant inputs in the Level 3 measurement not supported by market activity included our assessments of expected future cash flows related to our acquisition of

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

8. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Klein during the subsequent three years from the date of acquisition, appropriately discounted considering the uncertainties associated with the obligation, and calculated in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

The Company utilized a discounted cash flow method with expected future performance of Klein to arrive at the fair value of the contingent consideration. The Company will continue to reassess the fair value of the contingent consideration at each reporting date until settlement. Changes to the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration will be recognized in earnings of the Company.

The table below presents a reconciliation of all assets and liabilities of the Company measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the period from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2014:

	Fair Value of Contingent Consideration Liability

Balance at December 31, 2013	$	17,305
Settlement of contingent consideration liabilities		(6,158	)
Klein acquisition		2,800
Measurement period adjustment		(120	)
Fair market value adjustment		(1,432	)
Imputed interest		1,472

Balance at December 31, 2014	$	13,867

The Company assesses categorization of assets and liabilities by level at each measurement date, and transfers between levels are recognized on the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer, in accordance with the Company's accounting policy regarding the recognition of transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy. There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 and 3 during the year.

Following are the carrying and fair value of the Company's debt obligation as of December 31, 2014. The fair value of the Convertible Notes was calculated using observable market data and is considered a Level 1 liability.

	December 31, 2014

	Carrying Value			Fair Value
2019 Convertible Notes (principal amount outstanding of $172,500)	$	145,203	(1)	$	180,392

(1): Represents the aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Convertible Notes less the unaccreted discount.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

9. Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consist of the following:

	December 31,

	2014		2013
Accrued investment manager fees	$	25,195	$	19,310
Accrued compensation and related taxes		18,344		12,125
Accrued professional services		536		694
Accrued restructuring charges		—		551
Estimated accrued software license fees		800		—
Other accrued expenses		3,372		2,562

	$	48,247	$	35,242

The Company incurred restructuring charges of $474 (see Note 15), net of deferred rent adjustment, in the year ended December 31, 2013, due to lease termination penalties incurred to terminate the Denver and Raleigh leases.

The summary of activity in accrued restructuring charges was as follows:


Balance at December 31, 2012	$	—
Restructuring provision incurred		474
Lease termination payment accrued		551
Payments		(474	)

Balance at December 31, 2013		551
Payments		(551	)

Balance at December 31, 2014	$	—

10. Income Taxes

Income before income tax provision was generated in the following jurisdictions:

	Year ended December 31,

	2014		2013		2012
Current:
Domestic	$	21,437	$	4,074	$	2,702
Foreign		1,070		1,638		366

	$	22,507	$	5,712	$	3,068

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

10. Income Taxes (Continued)

The components of the income tax provision charged to operations are summarized as follows:

	Year ended December 31,

	2014			2013			2012
Current:
Federal	$	11,244		$	3,432		$	1,280
State		1,389			699			235
Foreign		535			468			946

		13,168			4,599			2,461

Deferred:
Federal	$	(3,662	)	$	(2,059	)	$	(48	)
State		(858	)		(492	)		170
Foreign		(120	)		4			20

		(4,640	)		(2,547	)		142

Total	$	8,528		$	2,052		$	2,603

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following:

	At December 31,

	2014			2013
Current:
Deferred revenue	$	440		$	—
Prepaid expenses and accruals		95			135
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards		4,119			2,702

Total current deferred tax assets		4,654			2,837
Less valuation allowance—current		—			(375	)

Net current deferred tax assets		4,654			2,462

Non-current:
Deferred rent and lease incentives		3,412			2,017
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards		18,844			14,210
Property and equipment and intangible assets		(20,033	)		(10,193	)
Stock-based compensation expense		8,175			5,004
Convertible notes		(10,255	)		—
Other		422			(294	)

Total long-term deferred tax assets		565			10,744
Less valuation allowance—non-current		—			(2,377	)

Net long-term deferred tax assets		565			8,367

Total deferred tax assets	$	5,219		$	10,829

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

10. Income Taxes (Continued)

The valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $0 and $2,752, respectively. The valuation allowance as of December 31, 2013 was related to capital losses of $2,085 and federal and state net operating losses of $667. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more-likely-than-not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized.

The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends on the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which net operating losses and temporary differences are deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax assets and liabilities (including the impact of available carryback and carryforward periods), projected taxable income, and tax-planning strategies in making this assessment. In order to fully realize the deferred tax assets, the Company will need to generate sufficient taxable income before the expiration of the deferred tax assets governed by the tax code. Based on the level of taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods for which the net operating losses are available and deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes that it is more-likely-than-not that, in consideration of its recorded valuation allowance, it will realize the benefits of the net operating losses and any other deferred tax assets. The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.

Upon exercise of stock options, the Company recognizes any difference between GAAP compensation expense and compensation expense for income tax purposes as a tax windfall or shortfall. The difference is charged to equity in the case of a windfall. When the exercise results in a windfall and the windfall results in a net operating loss ("NOL"), or the windfall increases an NOL carryforward, no windfall is recognized until the deduction reduces income taxes payable. For GAAP purposes, the Company has recognized all previously suspended windfall tax benefits because they were utilized on the Company's 2012 and 2013 tax returns to reduce taxes payable. The Company has recognized all current windfall tax benefits because they will be utilized on the Company's 2014 tax return to reduce taxes payable. The benefits were recorded in stockholders' equity, and as such, do not impact the Company's effective tax rate.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

10. Income Taxes (Continued)

The expected tax provision calculated at the statutory U.S. federal rate differs from the actual provision as follows:

	Year ended December 31,

	2014			2013			2012
Tax provision, at U.S. federal statutory tax rate	$	7,878		$	1,942		$	1,043
State income tax, net of federal tax benefit		648			149			64
Effect of permanent items		552			581			414
Effect of return to provision adjustment		(127	)		(733	)		(81	)
Change in valuation allowance		(2,085	)		—			(620	)
Capital loss write-off due to carryforward period expiration		2,085			—			—
Effect of change in federal and state income tax rate		(54	)		—			691
Uncertain tax positions		138			1,016			1,105
Foreign income taxes		—			(328	)		(93	)
Effect of repatriation of foreign earnings		—			582			—
Research and development credits		(1,564	)		(1,246	)		—
Federal and state NOL adjustments, net of valuation allowance impact		745			—			—
Other		312			89			80

Income tax provision	$	8,528		$	2,052		$	2,603

At December 31, 2014, the Company had NOL carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of $55,671 which are available to offset future federal taxable income, if any, and expire through 2031. As of December 31, 2014 we had NOL carryforwards for state income tax purposes of $36,586, available to reduce future income subject to income taxes. The state NOL carryforwards expire through 2031.

In addition, the Company has alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of approximately $875 for federal and $22 for California, which are available to reduce future federal regular income taxes, if any, over an indefinite period. The Company also has research and development credit carryforwards of approximately $534 for federal and $675 for California.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefit is as follows:

	Year ended December 31,

	2014			2013			2012
Unrecognized tax benefits balance at beginning of year	$	2,058		$	1,097		$	364
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year		365			181			517
Additions based on tax positions related to prior years		142			1,045			474
Reductions for settlements with taxing authorities related to prior years		(261	)		(56	)		—
Reductions for lapses of statute of limitations		(212	)		(209	)		(258	)

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at end of year	$	2,092		$	2,058		$	1,097

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

10. Income Taxes (Continued)

At December 31, 2014, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would benefit the Company's effective tax rate, if recognized, was $1,973. The Company estimates it is reasonably possible that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by as much as $1,469 in the next twelve months due to the completion of reviews by tax authorities, the voluntary filing of certain state income taxes and the expiration of certain statutes of limitations.

The Company filed voluntary disclosure agreements with six states during 2013 to limit the exposure to state income taxes in states where the Company had not filed tax returns. As of December 31, 2014, three of the six states have executed their agreements and one state has closed the requested voluntary disclosure agreement due to immateriality of the Company's past tax liabilities. The Company has filed the required returns for three of the states with executed agreements. It is management's belief that the remainder of these agreements will be settled within the next twelve months.

The Company recognizes potential interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, income tax expense/(benefit) includes ($41), $33, and $448, respectively, of potential interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits. The Company had accrued interest and penalties of $594 and $636 as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and separate tax returns with various states. Additionally, foreign subsidiaries of the Company file tax returns in foreign jurisdictions. The Company's tax returns for the calendar years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service in their entirety. The Company is currently under audit with the Internal Revenue Service for the year ended December, 31, 2012. With respect to state taxing jurisdictions, the Company's tax returns for calendar years ended 2009 through 2013 remain open to examination by various state revenue services.

The Company's Indian subsidiary is currently under examination by the India Tax Authority for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2011 and 2012. Based on the outcome of examinations of our subsidiary or the result of the expiration of statutes of limitations it is reasonably possible that the related unrecognized tax benefits could change from those recorded in the consolidated balance sheet. It is possible that one or more of these audits may be finalized within the next twelve months.

11. Debt

The Company's outstanding debt obligations as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

	December 31,

	2014			2013
Convertible Notes	$	172,500		$	—
Unaccreted discount on Convertible Notes		(27,297	)		—

	$	145,203		$	—

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

11. Debt (Continued)

Credit Agreement

On June 19, 2014, Envestnet and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement (the "Original Credit Agreement") with a group of banks (the "Banks"), for which Bank of Montreal is acting as administrative agent, pursuant to which the Banks agreed to provide an unsecured revolving credit facility of $70,000 with a sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit of $5,000. Subject to certain conditions, Envestnet had the right to increase the facility by up to $25,000. The Original Credit Agreement was scheduled to terminate on June 19, 2017, at which time any aggregate principal amount of borrowings outstanding would become payable in full. Any borrowings made under the Original Credit Agreement accrued interest at rates between 1.25 percent and 1.75 percent above LIBOR based on the Company's total leverage ratio. There was also a commitment fee equal to 0.25 percent per annum on the daily unused portion of the facility.

On December 8, 2014, Envestnet and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a first amendment to the Original Credit Agreement (collectively with the Original Credit Agreement, the "Credit Agreement"), dated June 19, 2014. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the amount of the unsecured revolving credit facility was increased from $70,000 to $100,000 with a sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit of $5,000. Any borrowings made under the Credit Agreement accrued interest at rates between 1.50 percent and 3.25 percent above LIBOR based on the Company's total leverage ratio. There is also a commitment fee equal to 0.25 percent per annum on the daily unused portion of the facility. Subject to certain conditions, Envestnet has the right to increase the facility by up to $25,000. The Credit Agreement is scheduled to mature on December 8, 2017.

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement will be guaranteed by substantially all of Envestnet's U.S. subsidiaries. Proceeds under the Credit Agreement may be used to finance capital expenditures, to finance working capital, to finance permitted acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.

The Credit Agreement contains customary conditions, representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. The covenants include certain financial covenants requiring Envestnet to maintain compliance with a maximum senior leverage ratio, a maximum total leverage ratio, a minimum interest coverage ratio and minimum adjusted EBITDA, and provisions that limit the ability of Envestnet and its subsidiaries to incur debt, make investments, sell assets, create liens, engage in transactions with affiliates, engage in mergers and acquisitions, pay dividends and other restricted payments, grant negative pledges and change their business activities. As of December 31, 2014, there were no amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement. The Company incurred interest expense of $259 for the year ended December 31, 2014 related to the Credit Agreement. The Company was in compliance with all covenants of the Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2014.

Convertible Notes

On December 15, 2014, the Company issued $172,500 of Convertible Notes. Net proceeds from the offering were $166,967. The Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 1.75 percent per annum payable semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on June 15, 2015.

The Convertible Notes are general unsecured obligations, subordinated in right of payment to our obligations under our Credit Agreement. The Convertible Notes rank equally in right of payment with all of the Company's existing and future senior indebtedness and will be senior in right of payment to

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

11. Debt (Continued)

any of the Company's future subordinated indebtedness. The Convertible Notes will be structurally subordinated to the indebtedness and other liabilities of any of our subsidiaries, other than to the extent the Convertible Notes are guaranteed in the future by our subsidiaries as described in the indenture and will be effectively subordinated to and future secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. Certain of our subsidiaries guarantee our obligations under our Credit Agreement.

Upon the occurrence of a "fundamental change", as defined in the indenture, the holders may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the Convertible Notes for cash at 100% of the principal amount of the Convertible Notes being purchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest.

The Convertible Notes are convertible into shares of the Company's common stock under certain circumstances prior to maturity at a conversion rate of 15.9022 shares per $1 principal amount of the Convertible Notes, which represents a conversion price of $62.88 per share, subject to adjustment under certain conditions. Holders may convert their Convertible Notes at their option at any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceeding July 1, 2019, only under the following circumstances: (a) during any calendar quarter commencing after the calendar quarter ending on March 31, 2015 (and only during such calendar quarter), if the last reported sale price of our common stock, for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the calendar quarter immediately preceding the calendar quarter in which the conversion occurs, is more than 130% of the conversion price of the Convertible Notes in effect on each applicable trading day; (b) during the five consecutive business-day period following any five consecutive trading-day period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of the Convertible Notes for each such trading day was less than 98% of the last reported sale price of our common stock on such date multiplied by the then-current conversion rate; or (c) upon the occurrence of specified corporate events as defined in the indenture.

Upon conversion, the Company may pay cash, shares of the Company's common stock or a combination of cash and stock, as determined by the Company in its discretion.

The Company has separately accounted for the liability and equity components of the Convertible Notes by allocating the proceeds from issuance of the Convertible Notes between the liability component and the embedded conversion option, or equity component. This allocation was done by first estimating an interest rate at the time of issuance for similar notes that do not include the embedded conversion option. The Company allocated $26,618 to the equity component, net of offering costs of $882. The Company recorded a discount on the Convertible Notes of $27,500 which will be accreted and recorded as additional interest expense over the life of the Convertible Notes. During 2014, the Company recognized $203 in accretion related to the discount. The effective interest rate of the liability component of the Convertible Notes is equal to the stated interest rate plus the accretion of original issue discount. The effective interest rate on the liability component of the Convertible Notes for the year ended December 31, 2014 was 6.1%.

In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, the Company incurred $4,651 of issuance costs, which are recorded in other non-current assets (see Note 7). These costs are being amortized and are recorded as additional interest expense over the life of the Convertible Notes.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

11. Debt (Continued)

Interest expense on the Convertible Notes was comprised of the following:

	December 31, 2014

Coupon interest	$	126
Amortization of issuance costs		38
Accretion of debt discount		203

	$	367

See Note 14 for further discussion of the effect of conversion on net income per common share.

12. Stockholders' Equity

In accordance with the terms of the merger agreement between Envestnet and Tamarac (see Note 3), Tamarac senior management were required to apply at least 50% (up to 100%) of the aggregate proceeds of the Tamarac change of control payment totaling $2,759 to purchase registered shares of Envestnet common stock (232,150 shares) in an amount equal to 95% multiplied by the Envestnet closing market price on the day before the merger closed. These shares cannot be sold or otherwise transferred for a period of two years following the date of merger. If a participant terminates their employment with the Company or is terminated for cause, the participant shall be required to pay the Company an amount equal to 5% multiplied by the closing market price on the day before the merger closed for each of the shares purchased by the participant.

On October 11, 2013, the Company completed a public offering of common shares on behalf of selling stockholders. A total of 5,801,997 shares were sold, including an overallotment option exercised by the underwriters, at a public offering price of $29.25 per share. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders. The Company incurred costs of $1,089 during the year ended December 31, 2013 in relation to the public offering and this amount is included in general and administration expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.

13. Stock-Based Compensation

On December 31, 2004, the Company adopted a stock incentive plan (the "2004 Plan"). The 2004 Plan provided for the grant of options to employees, consultants, and non-employee directors to purchase common stock, which vest over time and have a ten-year contractual term. To satisfy options granted under the 2004 Plan, the Company made common stock available from authorized but unissued shares or shares held in treasury, if any, by the Company. Stock options granted under the 2004 Plan were non-qualified stock options, as defined in the 2004 Plan agreement. Stock options were granted with an exercise price no less than the fair-market-value price of the common stock at the date of the grant.

The 2004 Plan has a change in control provision whereby if a change in control occurs and the participant's awards are not equitably adjusted, such awards shall become fully vested and exercisable and all forfeiture restrictions on such awards shall lapse. Based on the terms of the 2004 Plan, the Company's initial public offering in 2010 did not trigger the change in control provision and did not result in any modifications to the outstanding equity awards under the 2004 Plan.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

13. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

On June 22, 2010, the Board of Directors approved the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan ("2010 Plan"), effective upon the closing of the Company's initial public offering. The 2010 Plan provides for the grant of options, stock appreciation rights, Full Value Awards (as defined in the 2010 Plan) and cash incentive awards to employees, consultants, and non-employee directors to purchase common stock, which vest over time and have a ten-year contractual term. The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be delivered under the 2010 Plan is equal to the sum of 2,700,000 plus the number of shares of common stock that are subject to outstanding awards under the 2004 Plan which are forfeited, expire or are cancelled after the effective date of the Company's initial public offering. Stock options and stock appreciation rights are granted with an exercise price no less than the fair-market-value price of the common stock at the date of the grant.

As a result of the merger between Envestnet and Tamarac (see Note 3), the Company adopted the Envestnet, Inc. Management Incentive Plan for Envestnet | Tamarac Management Employees (the "2012 Plan"). The 2012 Plan provides for the grant of restricted common stock, stock options and the purchase of common stock for certain Envestnet | Tamarac employees. The maximum number of shares of stock which may be issued with respect to awards under the 2012 Plan is 1,023,851.

The 2012 Plan provides for the grant of up to 559,551 shares of unvested common stock ("Target Incentive Awards"). The Target Incentive Awards vest based upon Tamarac meeting certain performance conditions and then a subsequent two-year service condition. The Company measured the cost of these awards based on the estimated fair value of the award as of the market closing price on the day before the acquisition closed. The Company is recognizing the estimated expense on a graded-vesting method over a requisite service period of three to five years, which is the estimated vesting period. The Company estimates the expected vesting amount and recognizes compensation expense only for those awards expected to vest. This estimate is reassessed by management each reporting period and may change based upon new facts and circumstances. Changes in the assumptions impact the total amount of expense ultimately recognized over the vesting period.

The Company also granted to certain Envestnet | Tamarac employees 232,150 stock options to acquire Envestnet common stock at an exercise price of $12.51. These stock options vested on the second anniversary of the grant date.

As of December 31, 2014, the maximum number of options and restricted stock available for future issuance under the Company's plans is 751,041.

Employee stock-based compensation expense was as follows:

	Year ended December 31,

	2014			2013			2012
Employee stock-based compensation expense	$	11,423		$	8,738		$	4,342
Tax effect on employee stock-based compensation expense		(4,434	)		(3,196	)		(1,643	)

Net effect on income	$	6,989		$	5,542		$	2,699

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

13. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

Stock Options

The following weighted average assumptions were used to value options granted during the periods indicated:

	Year ended December 31,

	2014			2013			2012
Grant date fair value of options	$	16.81		$	6.11		$	4.96
Volatility		37.3	%		40.4	%		39.7	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.9	%		1.0	%		1.2	%
Dividend yield		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Expected term (in years)		6.0			6.0			6.0

The following table summarizes option activity under the Company's plans:

			Weighted- Average Exercise Price			Aggregate Intrinsic Value

Outstanding as of December 31, 2011	4,863,718		$	8.19	6.8	$	18,704
Granted	738,915			12.53
Exercised	(298,947	)		6.92
Forfeited	(26,274	)		11.03

Outstanding as of December 31, 2012	5,277,412			8.86	6.3		26,885
Granted	190,413			15.34
Exercised	(721,050	)		8.86
Forfeited	(109,304	)		12.33

Outstanding as of December 31, 2013	4,637,471			9.04	5.4		31,877
Granted	214,253			42.92
Exercised	(573,298	)		9.05
Forfeited	(13,089	)		18.12

Outstanding as of December 31, 2014	4,265,337			10.73	4.7		163,830



Options exercisable	3,797,011			8.72	4.2		153,474

The aggregate intrinsic values in the table above represent the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the aggregate difference between the fair value of the Company's common stock on December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 of $49.14, $40.30 and $13.95, respectively, and the exercise price of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date.

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

13. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

Exercise prices of stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2014 range from $0.11 to $45.81.

Other information is as follows:

	Year ended December 31,

	2014		2013		2012
Total intrinsic value of options exercised	$	20,867	$	13,745	$	1,611
Cash received from exercises of stock options		5,190		6,400		2,069
Cash received from issuance of restricted stock		1		1		2,759

At December 31, 2014, there was $3,329 of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options, which the Company expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.

Restricted Stock Awards

Periodically, the Company grants restricted stock awards under the 2010 Plan to employees that vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date. The Company also granted restricted stock awards under the 2012 Plan that vest upon Tamarac meeting certain performance conditions and then a subsequent two-year service condition.

The following is a summary of the activity for unvested restricted stock awards granted under the Company's plans:

			Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share

Balance at December 31, 2011	73,820		$	12.37
Granted	714,934			12.50
Vested	(24,568	)		—
Expired/cancelled	(1,064	)		12.45
Forfeited	(4,132	)		12.49

Balance at December 31, 2012	758,990			12.49
Granted	386,245			19.54
Vested	(74,298	)		—
Forfeited	(169,386	)		12.69

Balance at December 31, 2013	901,551			16.50
Granted	360,834			41.99
Vested	(143,264	)		—
Forfeited	(20,447	)		28.39

Balance at December 31, 2014	1,098,674			33.72

100

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

13. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

At December 31, 2014, there was $13,152 of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock awards, which the Company expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.

At December 31, 2014, there was an additional $2,770 of potential unrecognized stock compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock granted under the 2012 Plan that vests based upon Envestnet | Tamarac meeting certain performance conditions and then a subsequent two-year service condition, which the Company expects to recognize, if earned, over the remaining estimated vesting period of 0.3 to 2.3 years. On March 31, 2013, 181,625 shares of restricted stock became performance vested under the first year performance condition. On March 31, 2014, 290,544 shares of restricted stock became performance vested under the second year performance condition. These shares will become fully vested upon employees meeting the subsequent two-year service condition.

On April 11, 2013, the Company amended the 2012 Plan. The purpose of the amendment was to amend the methodology for determining the vesting requirements of performance awards granted under the 2012 Plan, as well as to grant awards to additional Envestnet | Tamarac employees eligible to participate in the 2012 Plan. The amendment to the 2012 Plan was treated as a modification. As a result, 113,249 performance awards were valued as of the date of the modification. Concurrent with the amendment, 103,521 performance awards were voluntarily forfeited by certain participants in the 2012 Plan and immediately reallocated to other participants in the 2012 Plan.

14. Earnings per Share

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. For the calculation of diluted earnings per share, the basic weighted average number of shares is increased by the dilutive effect of stock options, common warrants, restricted stock and Convertible Notes using the treasury stock method.

The Company accounts for the effect of the Convertible Notes on diluted net income per share using the treasury stock method since they may be settled in cash, shares or a combination thereof at the Company's option. As a result, the Convertible Notes have no effect on diluted net loss per share until the Company's stock price exceeds the conversion price of $62.88 per share. In the period of conversion, the Convertible Notes will have no impact on diluted net income if the Convertible Notes are settled in cash and will have an impact on dilutive net income per share if the Convertible Notes are settled in shares upon conversion.

101

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

14. Earnings per Share (Continued)

The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in computing basic and diluted net income per share attributable to common stockholders:

	Year ended December 31,

	2014		2013		2012
Basic income per share calculation:
Net income attributable to Envestnet, Inc.	$	14,174	$	3,660	$	465



Basic number of weighted-average shares outstanding		34,559,558		33,191,088		32,162,672



Basic net income per share	$	0.41	$	0.11	$	0.01



Diluted income per share calculation:
Net income attributable to Envestnet, Inc.	$	14,174	$	3,660	$	465



Basic number of weighted-average shares outstanding		34,559,558		33,191,088		32,162,672
Effect of dilutive shares:
Options to purchase common stock		2,165,808		1,979,474		954,056
Common warrants		—		378,282		177,257
Restricted stock		152,233		117,731		47,630

Diluted number of weighted-average shares outstanding		36,877,599		35,666,575		33,341,615



Diluted net income per share	$	0.38	$	0.10	$	0.01

Common share equivalents for securities that were anti-dilutive and therefore excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share are as follows:

	Year ended December 31,

	2014		2013		2012
Options to purchase common stock		—		—		1,209,748
Unvested restricted stock		90,792		432,272		559,551
Convertible debt		2,743,321		—		—

Total		2,834,113		432,272		1,769,299

15. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company rents office space under leases that expire at various dates through 2026. In 2013, the Company exercised its right to early terminate the Denver and Raleigh office leases in accordance with the provisions of the leases. The total termination fees were $1,142, of which approximately $551 was paid during 2013. The remainder of the fee was paid in 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded $474 (see Note 9) of restructuring charges, net of deferred rent adjustment, in the consolidated statement of operations related to these lease termination fees.

102

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

15. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

Future annual minimum lease commitments under operating leases were as follows:


Years ending December 31:
2015	$	6,651
2016		7,583
2017		6,869
2018		6,382
2019		6,278
Thereafter		22,911

Total	$	56,674

Rent expense for all operating leases totaled:

	Year ended December 31,

	2014		2013		2012
Rent expense	$	7,488	$	5,103	$	4,008

Purchase Obligations and Indemnifications

The Company enters into unconditional purchase obligations arrangements for certain of its services that it receives in the normal course of business. As of December 31, 2014, estimated future minimum unconditional purchase obligations are $3,688.

Litigation

The Company is involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business. The Company does not believe that the outcome of any of these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, would, if determined adversely to it, have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or business.

103

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

16. Major Customers

One customer accounted for the following percentage of the Company's revenues:

	December 31,

	2014			2013			2012
Fidelity		19	%		20	%		22	%

17. Benefit Plan

The Company sponsors a profit sharing and savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, covering substantially all domestic employees. The Company made voluntary employer matching contributions as follows:

	Year ended December 31,

	2014		2013		2012
Voluntary employer matching contributions	$	1,176	$	891	$	660

18. Net Capital Requirements

Portfolio Brokerage Services, Inc. ("PBS") is a broker-dealer subject to the SEC Uniform Net Capital Rule (SEC Rule 15c3-1), which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital and requires that the ratio of aggregate indebtedness to net capital ("net capital ratio"), both as defined, shall not exceed 15 to 1. SEC Rule 15c3-1 also provides that equity capital may not be withdrawn or cash dividends paid if the resulting net capital ratio would exceed 10 to 1. At December 31, 2014, the Company had net capital of $1,049, which was $949 in excess of its required net capital of $100. At December 31, 2014, the Company's net capital ratio was .09 to 1.

Additionally, PBS is subject to net capital requirements of certain self-regulatory organizations and at December 31, 2014, PBS was in compliance with such requirements.

104

Table of Contents

Envestnet, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

19. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Quarterly results for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

	2014

	First		Second		Third		Fourth
Total revenues	$	78,539	$	84,829	$	88,577	$	96,803
Income from operations		4,071		4,166		5,952		7,063
Net income attributable to Envestnet, Inc.(1)		2,994		3,719		3,768		3,693
Net income per share(1)
Basic*		0.09		0.11		0.11		0.11
Diluted*		0.08		0.10		0.10		0.10

	2013

	First		Second		Third		Fourth
Total revenues	$	46,625	$	51,632	$	69,880	$	74,398
Income from operations		588		1,757		1,737		1,430
Net income attributable to Envestnet, Inc.		541		1,118		1,306		695
Net income per share
Basic		0.02		0.03		0.04		0.02
Diluted		0.02		0.03		0.04		0.01

*: Numbers may not sum to full year totals due to rounding.
(1): During the fourth quarter, the Company recorded adjustments of $733 to decrease deferred tax assets and recognize income tax expense as a result of the completion of a NOL tax study, and $655 to decrease operating expenses and reduce the contingent consideration liability.

105

Table of Contents

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

a. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2014. The term "disclosure controls and procedures," as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2014, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective at the reasonable assurance level, because of a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to controls over the portion of revenues and cost of revenues of a business that was acquired in 2013, Wealth Management Solutions, that was not migrated to the Envestnet core technology platform in 2014. We also did not have adequately designed or documented controls related to the financial statement review process, including the review of manual journal entries. The material weakness is further described below in Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

b. Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for our company. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, a company's principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company's board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies and procedures that:

•: pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
•: provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and
•: provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

106

Table of Contents

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management has excluded Placemark Holdings, Inc. (Placemark), from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, because this entity was acquired by the Company in a business combination in the fourth quarter of 2014. Placemark has total assets representing $70,147,000 and has total revenues representing $6,157,000, of the Company's consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In connection with this assessment, we identified deficiencies related to inadequate design of certain controls. Specifically, we did not have adequately designed or documented controls to prevent or detect a material misstatement over the portion of revenues and cost of revenues of a business that was acquired in 2013, Wealth Management Solutions, that was not migrated to the Envestnet core technology platform in 2014. We also did not have adequately designed or documented controls related to the financial statement review process, including the review of manual journal entries.

While these deficiencies did not result in any material misstatements of our consolidated financial statements, they did, however, collectively represent a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—An Integrated Framework (1992). Because of the material weakness described above, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2014, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective.

KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting and, because of the material weakness described above, has issued an adverse report on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

c. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Other than the identification of the material weakness described above, there was no change to the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's quarter ended December 31, 2014 and that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

d. Remediation Plan

Management is committed to remediating the material weakness in a timely fashion. We have begun the process of developing a remediation plan that will address the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as discussed above. This remediation plan expected to be implemented will consider the following measures:

•: During 2014, the Company migrated a subset of the WMS clients from the legacy WMS platform to the Envestnet core technology platform. During 2014, management validated all revenues related to such migrated clients that were computed using the legacy WMS platform against all revenues computed by the Envestnet core technology platform for the same migrated clients, and noted no variances. Additionally, Management anticipates that as of December 31,

107

Table of Contents

2015, only one WMS client will remain on the WMS legacy platform, with final conversion expected in the first half of 2016. Upon completion of the conversion, the legacy WMS platform will no longer by utilized;

•: Review and enhancement of our internal controls related to the legacy WMS platform;
•: Review and enhancement of our internal controls related to the financial statement review process, including review controls over manual journal entries;
•: Implementation of technology enhancements specifically identified to increase the use and effectiveness of preventive controls in the financial statement review process;
•: Realignment of existing personnel and the addition of personnel to strengthen management's review and documentation over internal control over financial reporting.

The Audit Committee has directed management to develop a detailed plan and timetable for the implementation of remedial measures and will monitor their implementation. In addition, under the direction of the Audit Committee, management will continue to review and make necessary changes to the overall design of the Company's internal control environment as well as policies and procedures to improve the overall effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

Management believes the measures described above and others that will be implemented will remediate the control deficiencies identified and will strengthen our internal control over financial reporting. Management is committed to continuous improvement of the Company's internal control processes and will continue to diligently review our financial reporting controls and procedures. As management continues to evaluate and work to improve internal control over financial reporting, we may take additional measures to address control deficiencies or determine to modify, or in appropriate circumstances not to complete, certain of the remediation measures described above. We expect these remedial actions and or other actions related to this maternal weakness to be effectively implemented in 2015 in order to successfully remediate the material weakness reported within this Form 10-K by December 31, 2015.

If the remedial measures described above are insufficient to address the identified material weakness or are not implemented effectively, or additional deficiencies arise in the future, material misstatements in our interim or annual financial statements may occur in the future. Among other things, any unremediated material weakness could result in material post-closing adjustments in future financial statements. Furthermore, any such unremediated material weakness could have the effects described in "Item 1A, Risk Factors—In completing the assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to controls over the portion of revenues and cost of revenues of a business that was acquired in 2013, Wealth Management Solutions, that was not migrated to the Envestment core technology platform in 2014. We also did not have adequately designed or documented controls related to the financial statement review process, including the review of manual journal entries, and our failure to remedy this or other material weaknesses that we may identify in the future could result in material misstatements in our financial statements" in Part I of this Form 10-K.

108

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Envestnet, Inc.:

We have audited Envestnet, Inc.'s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Item 9A(b)). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A material weakness related to inadequately designed controls over the portion of revenues and cost of revenues of a business that was acquired in 2013, Wealth Management Solutions, that was not migrated to the Envestnet core technology platform in 2014, and the financial statement review process, including the review of manual journal entries, has been identified and included in management's assessment.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Envestnet, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014. This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in

109

Table of Contents

our audit of the 2014 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 2, 2015, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

In our opinion, because of the effect of the aforementioned material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Envestnet, Inc. has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by COSO.

Envestnet, Inc. acquired Placemark Holdings, Inc (Placemark) during 2014, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, Placemark's internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $70,147,000, and total revenues of $6,157,000, included in the consolidated financial statements of Envestnet, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Placemark.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 2, 2015

110

Table of Contents

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item relating to our directors and nominees, regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Act of 1934, and regarding our Audit Committee is included under the captions "Board of Directors," "Board Meetings and Committees—Audit Committee" (including information with respect to audit committee financial experts), "Stock Ownership of Management," and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in our Proxy Statement related to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 13, 2015, and is incorporated herein by reference.

The information required by this item relating to our executive officers and other corporate officers is included under the caption "Executive Officers of the Registrant" in Item 1 of this report.

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our employees, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer and our principal accounting officer. This code of ethics is posted on our Website. The Internet address for our Website is www.envestnet.com, and the code of ethics may be found from our main Web page by clicking first on "Investor Information" and then "Corporate Governance," and then on "Code of Business Conduct and Ethics."

We intend to disclose any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this code of ethics by posting such information to our Website, at the address and location specified above.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information regarding executive compensation is under the captions "Board Meetings and Committees—Director Compensation," "Board Meetings and Committees—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation," "Compensation Committee Report on Compensation Discussion and Analysis," and "Executive Compensation" in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 13, 2015, and is incorporated herein by reference, except the section captioned "Compensation Committee Report on Compensation Discussion and Analysis" is hereby "furnished" and not "filed" with this annual report on Form 10-K.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters is under the tables captioned "Stock Ownership of Management," "Persons Owning More Than Five Percent of Envestnet, Inc. Stock," and in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 13, 2015, and is incorporated herein by reference. For a description of securities authorized under our equity compensation plans, see Note 12 to the notes to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information set forth under "Board Meetings and Committees—Related Person Transaction Policies and Procedures," "Board of Directors" and "Audit Committee Report to Stockholders" in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders to be held May 13, 2015, is incorporated herein by reference except the section captioned "Audit Committee Report" is hereby "furnished" and not "filed" with this annual report on Form 10-K.

111

Table of Contents

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information regarding principal accountant fees and services is under the captions "Audit Committee Report to Stockholders—Audit Committee's Policy on Pre-Approval of Services Provided by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" and "Audit Committee Report to Stockholders—Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 13, 2015, and is incorporated herein by reference.

112

Table of Contents

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules



(a)(1)	Consolidated Financial Statements
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	64
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013	65
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012	66
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012	67
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012	68
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	69
(a)(2)	Evaluation and Qualifying Accounts
	Financial statements and schedules are omitted for the reason that they are not applicable, are not required, or the information is included in the financial statements or the related footnotes.

113

Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.			Description

	3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Envestnet, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165717), filed with the SEC on July 1, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).
	3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Envestnet, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165717), filed with the SEC on July 1, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).
	4.1		Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 22, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165717), filed with the SEC on March 26, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).
	4.2		First Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement dated as of August 30, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165717), filed with the SEC on March 26, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).
	4.3		Second Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement effective as of March 24, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165717), filed with the SEC on March 26, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).
	4.4		Joinder Agreements to Registration Rights Agreement (filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165717), filed with the SEC on March 26, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).
	4.5		Indenture, dated as of December 15, 2014, by and between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 15, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein).
	4.6		First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 15, 2014, by and between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 15, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.1		Technology and Services Agreement dated as of March 31, 2008, between Registrant and FMR LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165717), filed with the SEC on May 6, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.2		First Amendment to Technology and Services Agreement dated June 26, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165717), filed with the SEC on May 6, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.3		Second Amendment to Technology and Services Agreement dated May 5, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165717), filed with the SEC on May 6, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).

114

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.			Description

	10.4		Third Amendment to Technology and Services Agreement dated November 16, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165717), filed with the SEC on May 6, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.5		Services Agreement dated December 28, 2005 between Registrant and Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165717), filed with the SEC on May 6, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.6		Services Agreement effective March 24, 2005 between Registrant and National Financial Services LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165717), filed with the SEC on May 6, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.7		Services Agreement Amendment dated effective March 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165717), filed with the SEC on May 6, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.10		2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165717), filed with the SEC on July 1, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).*
	10.11		2004 Stock Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165717), filed with the SEC on July 1, 2010 and incorporated by reference herein).*
	10.12		Form of Equity Award, filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's 2010 Form 10-K, (filed with the SEC on March 18, 2011 and incorporated by reference herein).*
	10.13		Fourth Amendment to Technology Services Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2011, between Envestnet, Inc. and FMR LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 6, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.14		Amendment to Services Agreement effective December 31, 2011, between Envestnet Asset Management, Inc. and Fidelity (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 6, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.15		Third Amendment to Services Agreement effective December 31, 2011, between Envestnet Asset Management, Inc. and National Financial Services LLC. (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 6, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.16		Stock Purchase Agreement by and among The Sellers of Prima Capital Holding, Inc. Named Herein and Envestnet, Inc. dated as of February 9, 2012, (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's 10-K filed with the SEC on March 9, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.17		Merger Agreement by and among Tamarac Inc., Envestnet, Inc. and Titan Merger Corp and KLJ Consulting, LLC (as the Shareholder's Representative) dated as of February 16, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Company's 10-K filed with the SEC on March 9, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein).
	10.18		Envestnet, Inc. Management Incentive Plan for Envestnet \| Tamarac Management Employees (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (filed with the SEC on May 1, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein).*

115

Table of Contents

		Description

10.19		First Amendment to Envestnet, Inc. Management Incentive Plan for Envestnet \| Tamarac Management Employees (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 17, 2013 and incorporated by reference herein).*
10.20		Second Amendment to Envestnet, Inc. Management Incentive Plan for Envestnet \| Tamarac Management Employees (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 13, 2013 and incorporated by reference herein).*
10.21		Purchase and Sale Agreement between Prudential Investments LLC and Envestnet, Inc. dated as of April 11, 2013, (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 14, 2013 and incorporated by reference herein).**
10.22		Credit Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2014, among Envestnet, Inc., the Guarantors from time to time party thereto, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, and Bank of Montreal, as Administrative Agent, (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 25, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein).
10.23		Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement and Plan of Merger among Envestnet, Inc., Poseidon Merger Corp., Placemark Holdings, Inc., the Selling Securityholders and Fortis Advisors, LLC, as Securityholder Representative, dated as of August 11, 2014, (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein).
12.1		Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends filed herewith.
16.1		Letter re Change in Certifying Accountant dated February 27, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Company's 8-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2013 and incorporated by reference herein).
16.2		Letter re Change in Certifying Accountant dated March 4, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Company's 8-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2013 and incorporated by reference herein).
16.2		Letter re Change in Certifying Accountant dated April 4, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Company's 8-K filed with the SEC on April 5, 2013 and incorporated by reference herein).
21.1		Subsidiaries of the Company, filed herewith.
23.1		Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed herewith.
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	(1)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	(1)	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document***
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document***

116

Table of Contents

Exhibit No.			Description

	101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document***
	101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document***
	101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document***
	101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document***

(1): The material contained in Exhibit 32.1 and 32.2 is not deemed "filed" with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
*: Management contract or compensation plan.
**: Application has been made with the Securities and Exchange Commission to seek confidential treatment of certain provisions. Omitted material for which confidential treatment has been requested has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
***: Attached as Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are the following materials, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012; (v) notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

117

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


		ENVESTNET, INC.
Date: March 2, 2015		/s/ JUDSON BERGMAN Judson Bergman Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 2, 2015		/s/ PETER H. D'ARRIGO Peter H. D'Arrigo Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities on March 2, 2015.

Name		Position


/s/ JUDSON BERGMAN Judson Bergman		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Director (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ PETER H. D'ARRIGO Peter H. D'Arrigo		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ MATTHEW J. MAJOROS Matthew J. Majoros		Vice President, Financial Reporting (Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ ROSS CHAPIN Ross Chapin		Director
/s/ CYNTHIA EGAN Cynthia Egan		Director
/s/ JAMES FOX James Fox		Director

118

Table of Contents

Name		Position


/s/ JAMES JOHNSON James Johnson		Director
/s/ CHARLES ROAME Charles Roame		Director
/s/ YVES SISTERON Yves Sisteron		Director
/s/ GREG SMITH Greg Smith		Director

119