================================================================================
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[X] Annual report under section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
[ ] Transition report under section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934
For the transition period from _____________ to ______________
Commission file number 000-49654
CIRTRAN CORPORATION
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
Nevada 68-0121636
------------------------------- -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
4125 South 6000 West, West Valley City, Utah 84128
--------------------------------------------- ------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(801) 963-5112
--------------------------
(Issuer's telephone number)
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, Par
Value $0.001
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and
posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required
to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to submit and post such files). Yes [ ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller
reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one.)
Large Accelerated Filer [ ] Accelerated Filer [ ]
Non-accelerated Filer [ ] Smaller Reporting Company [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
The issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $ 9,044,902.
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was
sold as of June 30, 2010, was $ 3,994,174.
As of April 15, 2011, the issuer had outstanding 1,498,972,293 shares of Common
Stock, par value $0.001.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one) Yes [ ] No [X]
Documents incorporated by reference: None.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM NUMBER AND CAPTION Page
Part I
Item 1. Business 4
Item 2. Properties 17
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 17
Part II
Item 4. Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 20
Item 5. Selected Financial Data 22
Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis and Results of
Operations 22
Item 6A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 35
Item 7. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 35
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure 35
Item 8A(T) Controls and Procedures 35
Item 8B Other Information 37
Part III
Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance 37
Item 10. Executive Compensation 39
Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters 47
Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and
Director Independence 47
Item 13. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 50
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 51
Signatures 55
3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
This annual report on Form 10-K contains, in addition to historical information,
forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Our
actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated by CirTran
and discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to such differences are discussed below in the section entitled
"forward-looking statements" and elsewhere in this Annual Report. We disclaim
any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement,
whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. The
following discussion should be read together with our financial statements and
related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report.
CORPORATE BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW
In 1987, Cirtran Corporation (the "Company" or "we") was incorporated in Nevada
under the name Vermillion Ventures, Inc., for the purpose of acquiring other
operating corporate entities. We were largely inactive until July 1, 2000, when
our wholly owned subsidiary, CirTran Corporation (Utah) acquired substantially
all of the assets and certain liabilities of Circuit Technology, Inc.
("Circuit").
Our predecessor business in Circuit was commenced in 1993 by our president,
Iehab Hawatmeh. In 2001, we effected a 15-for-1 shares forward split and stock
distribution which increased the number of our issued and outstanding shares of
common stock. We also increased our authorized capital from 500,000,000 to
750,000,000 shares. In 2007, our shareholders approved a 1.2 -for-1 shares
forward split and an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation that increased
the authorized capital of the Company to 1,500,000,000 shares of common stock.
Corporate Overview - We conduct our business principally through nine
wholly-owned or majority owned subsidiaries or divisions:
o CirTran Corporation ("CirTran USA");
o CirTran - Asia, Inc. ("CirTran Asia");
o CirTran Products Corp. ("CirTran Products");
o CirTran Media Corp. ("CirTran Media");
o CirTran Online Corp. ("CirTran Online");
o CirTran Beverage Corp. ("CirTran Beverage");
o Racore Technology Corporation ("Racore");
o Play Beverages, LLC. ("PlayBev") and
o After Bev Group, LLC
CirTran USA
We provide a mix of high and medium volume turnkey manufacturing services using
surface mount technology ("SMT"), ball-grid array assembly, pin-through-hole,
and custom injection molded cabling for leading electronics original equipment
manufacturers ("OEMs") in the communications, networking, peripherals, gaming,
law enforcement, consumer products, telecommunications, automotive, medical, and
semiconductor industries. Our services include pre-manufacturing, manufacturing
and post-manufacturing services. Our goal is to offer our customers the
significant competitive advantages that can be obtained from manufacture
outsourcing, such as access to advanced manufacturing technologies, shortened
product time-to-market, reduced cost of production, more effective asset
utilization, improved inventory management, and increased purchasing power.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, approximately 2 percent and 13 percent,
respectively, of our revenues were generated by low-volume electronics assembly
activities, which consist primarily of the placement and attachment of
electronic and mechanical components on printed circuit boards and flexible
(i.e., bendable) cables. We also assemble higher-level subsystems and systems
incorporating printed circuit boards and complex electromechanical components
that convert electrical energy to mechanical energy, in some cases manufacturing
and packaging products for shipment directly to our customers' distributors. In
addition, we provide other manufacturing services, including refurbishment and
remanufacturing. We manufacture on a turnkey basis, directly procuring any of
the components necessary for production where the OEM customer does not supply
all of the components that are required for assembly. We also provide design and
new product introduction services, just-in-time delivery on low-to medium-volume
turnkey and consignment projects and projects that require more value-added
services, and price-sensitive, high-volume production.
4
On March 5, 2010, the Company and Katana Electronics, LLC ("Katana") entered
into certain agreements related to the Company's re-alignment of its legacy
electronic manufacturing business. In so doing the Company transferred its
rights and responsibilities to the Company's open and active purchase orders
relating to its legacy electronics contract manufacturing business to Katana
(which will lease equipment and manufacturing space), allowing the Company for
the present time, to focus its resources on areas of growth and profitability.
The Katana agreements are discussed in more detail below under the heading
"Electronic Products (Cirtran USA, Racore).
CirTran Asia
Through CirTran Asia, we design, engineer, manufacture, and supply products in
the international electronics, consumer products and general merchandise
industries for various marketers, distributors, and retailers selling overseas.
This subsidiary provides manufacturing services to the direct response and
retail consumer markets. Our experience and expertise in manufacturing enables
CirTran Asia to enter a project at various phases: engineering and design;
product development and prototyping; tooling; and high-volume manufacturing.
This presence with Asian suppliers helps us maintain an international contract
manufacturer status for multiple products in a wide variety of industries, and
has allowed us to target larger-scale contracts.
We intend to pursue manufacturing relationships beyond printed circuit board
assemblies, cables, harnesses and injection molding systems by establishing
complete "box-build" or "turn-key" relationships in the electronics, retail, and
direct consumer markets.
The Company has developed several fitness and exercise products, and products in
the household and kitchen appliance and health and beauty aids markets that are
manufactured in China. Sales of these products comprised approximately 1 percent
and 2 percent of revenues reported in 2010 and 2009, respectively. We anticipate
that offshore contract manufacturing will play an increased role moving forward
as resources will become available to the Company.
CirTran Products
CirTran Products pursues contract manufacturing relationships in the U.S.
consumer products markets, including products in areas such as: home/garden,
kitchen, health/beauty, toys, licensed merchandise, and apparel for film,
television, sports, and other entertainment properties. Licensed merchandise and
apparel is defined as any item that bears the image, likeness, or logo of a
product, or a person such as a well-known celebrity, that is sold or advertised
to the public. Licensed merchandise and apparel are sold and marketed in the
entertainment and sports franchise industries. Sales of these products comprised
less than 1 percent and 1 percent of total revenues in 2010 and 2009
respectively. We have concentrated our product development efforts into three
areas, home and kitchen appliances, beauty products and licensed merchandise. We
anticipate that these products will be introduced into the market either under
one uniform brand name or under separate trademarked names owned by CirTran
Products. We are presently preparing to launch various programs where CirTran
Media will operate as the marketer, campaign manager and distributor in various
product categories including beauty products, entertainment products, software
products, and fitness and consumer products. The Company anticipates in
increasing role in this market as resources become available for allocation to
this division.
CirTran Media
In 2006, we formed Diverse Media Group, now known as CirTran Media, to provide
end-to-end services to the direct response and entertainment industries. We are
developing marketing production services, and preparing programs in which
CirTran Media will operate as the marketer, campaign manager and/or distributor
for beauty, entertainment, software, and fitness consumer products. In 2006, we
entered into an agreement with Diverse Talent Group, Inc., a California
corporation ("DT"), whereby DT agreed to provide outsourced talent agency
services in exchange for growth financing. In March 2007, we mutually agreed
with DT to terminate the agreement, and assigned to DT the name "Diverse Media
Group." The Company had no revenues relating to this subsidiary in 2010 and
2009.
5
In 2006, CirTran Media leased a sales office in Bentonville, Arkansas, in close
proximity to Wal-Mart's world headquarters. The office is located there to help
create and manage an ongoing relationship with Wal-Mart and Sam's Club stores,
and other retailers in order to facilitate the distribution of products through
those channels. This division is playing an increasing role in setting up retail
distribution for our beverage division.
CirTran Online
During the first quarter of 2007, we started CirTran Online to sell products via
the internet; to offer training, software, marketing tools, web design and
support, and other e-commerce related services to entrepreneurs; and to
telemarket directly to customers. As part of CirTran Online's business plan, we
entered into an agreement with Global Marketing Alliance ("GMA"), a Utah limited
liability company specializing in providing services to eBay sellers, conducting
internet marketing seminars, and developing and hosting web sites. Revenues
derived from the arrangement with GMA comprised 12 percent and 26 percent of
total revenue in 2010 and 2009, respectively.
CirTran Beverage
In May 2007, we incorporated CirTran Beverage to arrange for the manufacture,
marketing and distribution of Playboy-licensed energy drinks, flavored water
beverages, and related merchandise through various distribution channels. We
also entered into an agreement with PlayBev, LLC ("PlayBev"), a related Delaware
limited liability company and the licensee under a product licensing agreement
with Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. ("Playboy"). Under the terms of the
PlayBev agreement, we are to provide the initial development and promotional
services to PlayBev, who will collect from us a royalty based on product sales
and manufacturing costs once licensed product distribution commences. As part of
efforts to finance the initial development and marketing of the Playboy energy
drink, the Company, along with other investors, formed After Bev Group LLC
("AfterBev"), a majority-owned subsidiary organized in California.
Effective January 1, 2010, PlayBev was required to be consolidated into the
financial statements of the Company as a variable interest entity. PlayBev holds
a license agreement with Playboy Enterprises, Inc. ("Playboy") to market,
manufacture and distribute energy drinks and beverages under their brand name.
Two versions of the Playboy energy drink, regular and sugar-free with 8.4 oz
cans, have been developed. During 2007, PlayBev and the Company conducted focus
group taste tests to determine the best flavor and ingredients; publicized the
new drink via promotional bus tours, celebrity-attended activities, and magazine
ads; and negotiated with production facilities and distribution groups. During
2008, the Company secured distribution contracts and the drink began selling in
New England, Florida, Atlanta, Oklahoma, and California. We also developed 16 oz
cans for the same two versions based on demand. Another promotional bus tour
began in Las Vegas at the end of February 2008, and the following month
continued into Florida. In 2009 and 2010, we expanded sales both domestically
and internationally. We currently have sales and distribution networks in 65
countries, throughout Europe, Africa, Australia, the Pacific and the Middle
East, and we anticipate continued growth in 2011. Energy drink sales in 2010 and
2009 accounted for 85 percent and 18 percent of total sales, respectively. In
2009, CirTran Beverage has billings to PlayBev for development and marketing
services equal to 40 percent of total sales.
Racore Technology Corporation
Through our subsidiary, Racore Technology Corporation ("Racore"), we provide
engineering design services to customers of some of our other subsidiaries.
PRIMARY PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
The Company has four primary product and service areas: beverages; media/online
marketing services; electronic products; and contract and manufacturing of
consumer products.
6
Beverages (CirTran Beverage)
During 2007, we developed two versions of the Playboy-labeled energy drink:
regular and sugar-free. Other products considered under the PlayBev agreement
are flavored water beverages and related merchandise. During 2007, we also
initiated a promotional marketing program, whereby contacts were made with
several celebrities who helped publicize the new energy drinks. Additionally, we
ran a college-town bus tour throughout the Southwest United States, and the
geographic area of the NCAA's Southeastern Conference. Ads were placed in
college-oriented editions of magazines, and we developed collateral materials
used to support the product in the college marketplace. A focus group taste test
was conducted by Alder-Weiner Research, and the results proved favorable with
regards to flavor and ingredients.
Promotional activities continued through 2009 and 2010 throughout the United
States and international markets. During 2010, additional promotional activities
were also put in place. Beverage segment revenues for the year ended December
31, 2010 and 2009 were $7.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively.
We continue to expand distribution nationally and internationally, having signed
international distribution agreements to distribute our line of Playboy-branded
energy drinks to 65 countries, including Australia, New Zealand, Albania,
Greece, India, Lebanon, Mexico, Nigeria, Russia, South Africa, South Korea,
Spain, Brazil, Paraguay, Argentina, Canada, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech
Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Turkey.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded revenues totaling $7.7
million relating to Playboy-branded energy drink products sold and distributed
throughout the world.
Media/Online Marketing Services (CirTran Media, CirTran Online)
In October 2005, we opened a satellite office in Los Angeles, with a two year
lease, in accordance with a planned internal expansion program. In November
2007, a new office space was leased (3 year term) in Los Angeles to house
personnel involving CirTran Asia-related product transportation, along with
activities connected with our beverage business. As of the date of this Report,
we had moved out of the office location described above, and were looking for a
new location. We anticipate that the Los Angeles office will be used almost
exclusively for our beverage business.
In early 2007, we signed a three-year, Assignment and Exclusive Services
Agreement with GMA, founded by Mr. Sovatphone Ouk, and its affiliate companies,
Online Profit Academy, LLC, and Online 2 Income, LLC, including Webprostore.com
and Myitseasy.com. Based in the Salt Lake area, these companies offer a wide
range of services for e-commerce, including eBay sellers. We plan to work
closely with the GMA companies to sell products via the internet, and to offer
training, software, marketing tools, web design and support, as well as other
e-commerce related services to internet entrepreneurs. Through the GMA
companies, we also intend to telemarket directly to buyers of our products and
services. We also signed a three-year employment agreement with Mr. Ouk to serve
as Senior Vice President of our new CirTran Online subsidiary. GMA and its
affiliate companies offer a range of complementary capabilities and products for
e-commerce, including seminars on how to buy and sell on the World Wide Web. GMA
is experienced in building e-commerce websites, and currently hosts sites for
internet entrepreneurs. The agreements are to continue on a month to month basis
upon completion of the original term. Both agreements remained in effect during
2009 and 2010.
Electronics Products (CirTran USA, Racore)
Since 1993, we have devoted resources to our traditional electronics business
and product lines. We manufacture all of our electronics products through
CirTran USA, and provide some engineering services through Racore.
As previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 11, 2010,
on March 5, 2010, the Company and Katana Electronics, LLC, a Utah limited
liability company ("Katana") entered into certain agreements related to the
Company's re-alignment of its legacy electronic manufacturing business (the
"Agreements"). In so doing the Company transferred its rights and
responsibilities to the Company's open and active purchase orders relating to
its legacy electronics contract manufacturing business to Katana (which will
lease equipment and manufacturing space), allowing the Company for the present
time, to focus its resources on areas of growth and profitability. The
Agreements included an Assignment and Assumption Agreement, Sublease Agreement
and Equipment Lease.
7
An overview and summary of the Agreements follows. The summaries of the terms
and conditions of the Agreements do not purport to be complete, and are
qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the agreements.
Assignment and Assumption Agreement
The Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated March 5, 2010, between the
Company and Katana (the "Assignment Agreement") sets forth the terms and
conditions of the Company's transfer of its right, title, interest, obligations
and duties in, under and to all of the Company's open and active purchase orders
relating to its legacy electronics manufacturing business existing as of March
5, 2010 (the "Purchase Orders"). In exchange for the assignment of the minimal
Purchase Orders, Katana agreed to assume all obligations under and service the
Purchase Orders and indemnify the Company from any losses or claims arising from
or under the Purchase Orders as of the date of the Assignment Agreement.
The Company made standard representations regarding the ownership and status of
the Purchase Orders in connection with the assignment.
Sublease Agreement
In connection with the assignment of the Purchase Orders pursuant to the
Assignment Agreement, the Company entered into a Sublease Agreement with KATANA
(the "Sublease"). The Company leases from Don L. Buehner the real property and
its improvements located at 4125 South 6000 West, West Valley, Utah, 84128 (the
"Premises"). Pursuant to the terms of the Sublease, the Company will sublease a
certain portion of the Premises to Katana consisting of the warehouse,
electronics product manufacturing and assembly area, and office space used as of
the close of business on March 4, 2010, for the legacy electronics manufacturing
business of the Company.
The term of the Sublease is for two (2) months with automatic renewal periods of
one month each. The base rent under the Sublease is $8,500 per month. The
Sublease contains normal and customary use restrictions, indemnification rights
and obligations, default provisions and termination rights.
Equipment Lease
In connection with the assignment of the Purchase Orders pursuant to the
Assignment Agreement, the Company entered into an Equipment Lease with KATANA
(the "Equipment Lease") for the lease of certain machinery and equipment related
to the Company's legacy electronics manufacturing business.
The term of the Equipment Lease is two (2) months with automatic renewal periods
of one month each. The base rent under the Equipment Lease is $1,000 per month.
The Equipment Lease contains normal and customary use restrictions,
indemnification rights and obligations, default provisions and termination
rights.
In June 2010, subsequent to the entry into the agreements with Katana, YA Global
Investments, LP ("YA") brought suit against the Company and Katana, claiming
that the Company had improperly assigned assets to Katana. On January 24, 2011,
the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Forbearance Agreement with YA,
including a confession of judgment in favor of YA. On February 23, 2011, the
court entered judgment based on the confession of judgment against the Company
in the amount of $3,161,354 in principal, plus $825,858 in interest. (The
Amended and Restated Forbearance Agreement is discussed below under the heading
"Entry into Forbearance Agreement and Amendment.")
Contract and Manufacturing of Consumer Products
Fitness and Exercise Products (CirTran Asia)
8
The Company began manufacturing fitness products in 2004. To date, we have
manufactured numerous fitness products and sold over 12 different fitness
products. We manufacture all of our fitness products through our CirTran Asia
subsidiary, originally via an exclusive, three-year manufacturing agreement with
certain developers and their affiliates that expired by its terms during
mid-2007, but which continues on a month-to-month basis. The Company continues
to offer contract manufacturing services moving forward.
Household and Kitchen Appliances, and Health and Beauty Aids
(CirTranMedia, CirTranProducts, CirtranAsia)
We began manufacturing household and kitchen appliance products in January 2005.
To date, we have manufactured and sold various household and kitchen appliance
products. These products are sold through Cirtran Media and Cirtran Products. We
manufacture the majority of our household and kitchen appliance products through
our CirTran Asia operation.
In 2005, we signed an exclusive manufacturing agreement with Advanced Beauty
Solutions L.L.C. ("ABS"), regarding the True Ceramic Pro(TM) ("TCP") flat iron
hair product. Later in 2005, we were notified that ABS had defaulted on certain
obligations to a financing company. We stopped shipping under credit, and
exercised rights permitted by the agreement. Following efforts to resolve
disputes, we filed a lawsuit against ABS, citing various claims, and sought
damages. By then, we had shipped approximately $4.7 million worth of TCP units,
and were owed approximately $4.0 million. We repossessed from ABS approximately
$2.3 million worth of TCP units, and have since been selling TCP units directly
to ABS customers as permitted under the bankruptcy proceedings, which also
required us to pay royalties to various ABS creditors (see "Legal Proceedings"
for more information regarding ABS-related litigation).
In November 2006, we entered into an exclusive agreement with Beautiful Eyes(R),
Inc. for a new "hot lashes" product to be sold via infomercials and through
retailers. Through the end of 2007, we worked with the customer, developing the
product and submitting samples for approval. The infomercial for the product was
completed during 2008. We anticipate initiating market tests in the near future.
In February 2007, we announced completion of an infomercial featuring former
heavyweight boxing champion Evander Holyfield and The Real Deal Grill(TM), an
indoor/outdoor cooking appliance. Media testing took place in the fall of 2007.
Sales of approximately $10,000 resulted, and certain changes were made to the
infomercial. We have contracted with another media company for infomercial
airings and distribution, and during early 2008 decided to make additional
changes to the infomercial to determine if a roll-out was justified. During 2008
we also completed retail packaging design for this product and presented the
product to major retailers. We continue sell the product with online retailers
and we continue to work with other leading retailers to order to bring the Real
Deal Grill to their shelves in the near future.
INDUSTRY BACKGROUND
New Age Beverages. The Playboy energy drink and other products we are developing
are part of a growing market segment of the beverage industry known as the "new
age" or alternative beverage industry. The alternative beverage category
combines non-carbonated ready-to-drink iced teas, lemonades, juice cocktails,
single serve juices and fruit beverages, ready-to-drink dairy and coffee drinks,
energy drinks, sports drinks, and single-serve still water (flavored, unflavored
and enhanced) with "new age" beverages, including sodas that are considered
natural, sparkling juices and flavored sparkling beverages. The alternative
beverage category is the fastest growing segment of the beverage marketplace,
according to Beverage Marketing Corporation.
As we continue to launch our Playboy energy drink and other licensed products,
we will compete with other beverage companies not only for consumer acceptance
but also for shelf space in retail outlets and for marketing focus by our
distributors, all of whom also distribute other beverage brands. Our energy
drink products compete with all non-alcoholic beverages; most of the competing
products are marketed by companies with substantially greater financial
resources than ours. We also compete with regional beverage producers and
"private label" soft drink suppliers. We believe that our leading energy drink
competitors are Red Bull and Monster.
9
Contract Manufacturing. The contract manufacturing industry specializes in
providing the program management, technical and administrative support and
manufacturing expertise required to take products from the early design and
prototype stages through volume production and distribution. The goal is to
provide the customer with a quality product, delivered on time and at the lowest
cost. This full range of services gives the customer an opportunity to avoid
large capital investments in plant, inventory, equipment and staffing, and to
concentrate instead on innovation, design and marketing. By using our contract
manufacturing services, customers have the ability to improve the return on
their investment with greater flexibility in responding to market demands and
exploiting new market opportunities.
In previous years we identified an important trend in the manufacturing
industry. We found that customers increasingly required contract manufacturers
to provide complete turnkey manufacturing and material handling services, rather
than working on a consignment basis where the customer supplies all materials
and the contract manufacturer supplies only labor. Turnkey contracts involve
design, manufacturing and engineering support, the procurement of all materials,
and sophisticated in-circuit and functional testing and distribution. The
manufacturing partnership between customers and contract manufacturers involves
an increased use of "just-in-time" inventory management techniques that minimize
the customer's investment in component inventories, personnel and related
facilities, thereby reducing their costs.
MARKET AND BUSINESS STRATEGY
We maintain capabilities domestically and internationally through multiple
channels in product manufacturing, marketing, and distribution. More
specifically, we can provide solutions in areas such as campaign management,
direct-response media, retail and wholesale distribution, web-based marketing,
along with print/catalog and live shopping marketing channels.
We have concentrated our focus on promoting four operating business segments.
These segments include Beverage Distribution, Marketing and Media, Contract
Manufacturing and Electronics Assembly.
Beverage Distribution
We feel that our beverage business will continue to have a substantial impact on
our business. The New Age Beverage industry is still on the move. According to
Beverage Digest, a trade publication covering the non-alcoholic beverages
industry, caffeinated energy drinks have become the fastest-growing sector of
the $93 billion domestic beverage industry. Sales of energy drinks grew 700
percent over the past five years, and continue to grow at a double digit rate,
according to beverage industry consultants. This industry is growing due to
current attention to new brands, non-coffee drinkers, and people interested in
health and fitness. By directing products to specific groups such as extreme
sports enthusiasts, energy drinks target consumer groups made up primarily of
male teenagers and young people in the 20's age bracket.
Marketing and Media
We currently provide product marketing services to the direct response and
retail markets for both proprietary and non-proprietary products. This segment
provides campaign management and marketing services for both the Direct
Response, Retail and Beverage Distribution markets. We provide marketing and
media services to support our own product efforts, and offer to customers
marketing service in channels involving television, radio, print media, and the
internet.
Contract Manufacturing
Based on the trends observed in the contract manufacturing industry, one of our
goals is to benefit from the increased market acceptance of, and reliance upon,
the use of manufacturing specialists by many OEMs, marketing firms,
distributors, and national retailers. We believe the trend towards outsourcing
manufacturing will continue. OEMs utilize manufacturing specialists for many
reasons, including reducing the time it takes to bring new products to market,
reducing the initial investment required and to access leading manufacturing
technology, gaining the ability to better focus resources in other value-added
areas, and improving inventory management and purchasing power. An important
element of our strategy is to establish partnerships with major and emerging OEM
leaders in diverse segments across the electronics industry. Due to the costs
inherent in supporting customer relationships, we focus our efforts on customers
with which the opportunity exists to develop long-term business partnerships.
Our goal is to provide our customers with total manufacturing solutions for both
new and more mature products, as well as across product generations - an idea we
call "Concept to Consumer."
10
We have hired qualified personnel to support new ventures, and in 2006 we opened
a dedicated office in Bentonville, Arkansas, to directly service the Wal-Mart
market. As additional product lines are added, we plan to increase our marketing
staff.
Electronics Assembly
As described above, on March 5, 2010, the Company and Katana Electronics, LLC,
entered into certain agreements related to the Company's re-alignment of its
legacy electronic manufacturing business (the "Agreements"). The Agreements
included an Assignment and Assumption Agreement, Sublease Agreement and
Equipment Lease.
We utilize subcontractors, both domestically and internationally (particularly
in China), to manufacture products that we choose not to produce ourselves. We
have arrangements with co-packing bottling companies, along with can
manufacturers to provide us with products for energy drink beverage
distribution. This strategy has proved effective and is allowing us the ability
to maintain a lean operational structure and the opportunity to generate
increased profit margins.
Our sources of components for our electronics assembly business are either
manufacturers or distributors of electronic components. These components include
passive components, such as resistors, capacitors and diodes, and active
components, such as integrated circuits and semi-conductors.
SALES AND MARKETING
The Company continues to pursue product development and business development
professionals with concentrated efforts on the direct response, product and
retail distribution businesses, as well as sales executives for the electronics
manufacturing division. In 2006, we opened our office in Bentonville, Arkansas,
in close proximity to Wal-Mart's world headquarters. The office is managed by an
employee who is responsible for developing and managing an ongoing relationship
with Wal-Mart and Sam's Club stores.
It is our intention to continue pursuing sales representative relationships as
well as internal salaried sales executives. In 2006, the Company opened a
dedicated satellite sales/engineering office in Los Angeles to headquarter all
business development activities companywide. Among other things, we use that
office to produce infomercials for the direct marketing industry, and for
product marketing campaigns. From the Los Angeles office we also provide product
marketing, production, media funding, and merchandising services to the direct
response and entertainment industries. As of the date of this Report, the
Company has moved out of the office location described above and was looking for
a new location. We anticipate the primary purpose of this new office will be to
support the beverage division.
We are working aggressively to market existing products through current sales
channels. We will also seek to add new conduits to deliver products and services
directly to end users, as well as motivate our distributors, partners, and other
third party sales mechanisms. We continue to simplify and improve the sales,
order, and delivery process. We are also pursuing strategic relationships with
retail distribution firms to engage with us in a reciprocal relationship where
they would act as our retail distribution arm and we would act as their
manufacturing arm with both parties giving the other priority and first
opportunity to work on the other's products.
Historically, we have had substantial recurring sales from existing customers.
With the growth of the beverage distribution sales, we are rapidly gaining new
customers both domestically and internationally. We consider sales and marketing
as an integrated process involving direct salespersons and project managers, as
well as senior executives. We also use independent sales representatives in
certain geographic areas. We have also engaged strategic consulting groups to
make strategic introductions to generate new business. This strategy has proven
successful, and has already generated multiple manufacturing contracts.
11
In 2010, 9 percent of our net sales were derived from new customers, whereas
during 2009, 25 percent of our net sales were sourced from new customers. The
decline in new customer sales was caused by the Company's focus on existing
international and domestic customers. During 2010, nearly 97 percent of the
sales from recurring customer sales were related to sales to PlayBev and revenue
derived via the GMA contract. We anticipate beverage-related sales and services,
together with sales from our contract manufacturing segment, to continue
providing the majority of our net sales.
Our expansion into manufacturing in China has allowed us to increase our
manufacturing capacity and output with minimal capital investment required. By
using various subcontractors we leverage our upfront payments for inventories
and tooling to control costs and receive benefits from economics of scale in
Asian manufacturing facilities. These expenses can be upwards of $100,000 per
product. Typically, and depending on the contract, the Company will prepay some
factories anywhere from 10 percent to 50 percent of the purchase orders for
materials. In exchange for theses financial commitments, the Company receives
dedicated manufacturing responsiveness and eliminates the costly expense
associated with capitalizing completely proprietary facilities. In addition, the
Company has expanded its manufacturing capabilities for its Beverage division
outside the United States to accommodate customers located in Europe. In 2010,
the Company contracted with a manufacturer in Budapest, Hungary, and in early
2011 in India to accommodate its distributor in those areas.
The Company has beverage contracts that require minimum quantity purchase orders
over periods terminating between 2011 and 2019. If the full minimum quantity
orders are purchased under these current agreements, they would generate upwards
of $500,000,000 in revenues to the Company. The majority of these international
distribution contracts are based on minimum orders they are required to purchase
during the term of the contract to maintain their rights of selling the Playboy
Energy Drink. Revenue under these contracts is not recognized until ordered
products have been shipped. There is no assurance, except for the upfront
deposits, that the parties to these agreements will meet their obligations for
the minimum quantity or any level of purchases required under their respective
agreements.
During a typical contract manufacturing sales process, a customer provides us
with specifications for the product it wants, and we develop a bid price for
manufacturing a minimum quantity that includes manufacture engineering, parts,
labor, testing, and shipping. If the bid is accepted, the customer is required
to purchase the minimum quantity, and additional product is sold through
purchase orders issued under the original contract. Special engineering services
are provided at either an hourly rate or at a fixed contract price for a
specified task.
MATERIAL CONTRACTS AND RELATIONSHIPS
We generally use form agreements with standard industry terms as the basis for
our contracts with our customers. The form agreements typically specify the
general terms of our economic arrangement with the customer (number of units to
be manufactured, price per unit and delivery schedule) and contain additional
provisions that are generally accepted in the industry regarding payment terms,
risk of loss and other matters. We also use a form agreement with our
independent marketing representatives that features standard terms typically
found in such agreements.
Broadata Agreement
In 2004, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Broadata
Communications, Inc., a California corporation ("Broadata"). Under which
agreement we purchased 400,000 shares of Broadata Series B Preferred Stock (the
"Broadata Preferred Shares") for an aggregate purchase price of $300,000. The
Broadata Preferred Shares are convertible, at our option, into an equivalent
number of shares of Broadata common stock, subject to adjustment. The Broadata
Preferred Shares are not redeemable by Broadata. As a holder of the Broadata
Preferred Shares, we have the right to vote the number of shares of Broadata
common stock into which the Broadata Preferred Shares are convertible at the
time of the vote. Separate from the acquisition of the Broadata Preferred
Shares, we also entered into a Preferred Manufacturing Agreement with Broadata.
Under this agreement, we manufacture Broadata's product at an agreed-upon price
per component, thus providing "turn-key" manufacturing services from material
procurement to complete finished box-build of all of Broadata's products. The
initial term of the agreement was for three years, and following the end of this
initial term, both parties agreed to continue the relationship on a
month-to-month basis.
12
PlayBev Agreement
The consolidated financial statements of the Company also include the accounts
of PlayBev LLC ("PlayBev") a newly consolidated variable interest entity.
PlayBev holds a license agreement with Playboy International, Inc. ("Playboy")
to manufacture and distribute energy drinks and water under the PlayBoy name. In
prior years, PlayBev was not required to be consolidated due to lack of control
over significant decisions by the Company or its affiliates. Effective January
1, 2010, the Company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of PlayBev
and began to consolidate into its financial statements the accounts of PlayBev.
In May 2007, the Company entered into an exclusive, three-year manufacturing,
marketing, and distribution agreement (the "PlayBev Agreement") with PlayBev. In
August 2007, the Company extended the agreement's term to ten years. PlayBev is
the licensee under a product licensing agreement with Playboy. The PlayBev
Agreement allows the Company to arrange for the manufacture, marketing and
distribution of Playboy-licensed energy drinks, flavored water beverages, and
related merchandise through various distribution channels. Under the terms of
this agreement, the Company is to provide the initial development and
promotional services to PlayBev.
PlayBev had no operations, so under the terms of the PlayBev Agreement, the
Company was appointed the master manufacturer and distributor of the beverages
and other products that PlayBev licensed from Playboy. As a result, we have
assumed all the risk of collecting amounts owed from customers, and contracting
with vendors for manufacturing and marketing activities.
The Company also agreed to provide services to PlayBev for initial development,
marketing, and promotion of the new beverage.
Entry into Forbearance Agreement and Amendment
On January 24, 2011, the Company, certain of its subsidiaries listed below, and
YA Global Investments (formerly known as Cornell Capital Partners, LP) ("YA")
finalized an amended and restated forbearance agreement (the "A&R Forbearance
Agreement") and related agreements, which related to certain financing
arrangements and agreements between the Company and YA and its predecessors. The
A&R Forbearance Agreement was dated as of January 7, 2011, but the final
conditions for closing were met on January 24, 2011.
A&R Forbearance Agreement
An overview and summary of the A&R Forbearance Agreement between the Company and
YA, together with other agreements entered into in connection with the A&R
Forbearance Agreement, follows. The summaries of the terms and conditions of the
A&R Forbearance Agreement and the other agreements do not purport to be
complete, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of
the agreements which were filed as exhibits to a Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on January 28, 2011.
The A&R Forbearance Agreement related specifically to three debentures issued by
the Company to YA or its predecessor entities: a May 26, 2005, debenture in the
principal amount of $3,750,000 (the "May Debenture"), a December 30, 2005,
debenture in the principal amount of $1,500,000 (the "December Debenture"), and
an August 23, 2006, debenture in the principal amount of $1,500,000 (the "August
Debenture," and collectively with the May Debenture and the December Debentures,
the "Debentures"), together with certain other agreements entered into in
connection with the issuance of the Debentures (collectively, the "Financing
Documents").
The parties to the A&R Forbearance Agreement are the Company; YA; and the
following subsidiaries of the Company: Racore Network, Inc. (hereinafter,
"Racore"); Cirtran - Asia, Inc. (hereinafter, "Asia"); Cirtran Beverage Corp.
(hereinafter, "Beverage"); Cirtran Media Corp. (hereinafter, "Media"); Cirtran
Online Corp. (hereinafter, "Online"); Cirtran Products Corp. (hereinafter,
"Products"); and Cirtran Corporation (Utah) (hereinafter, "Cirtran Sub," and
together with Racore, Asia, Beverage, Media, Online and Products, collectively,
jointly and severally, the "Guarantors"). The A&R Forbearance Agreement
references certain events of default under the Financing Documents, and notes
that the Company and the Guarantors (collectively, the "Obligors") had requested
that YA forbear from enforcing its rights and remedies under the Financing
Documents, and sets for the agreement between the Obligors and YA with respect
to such forbearance.
13
Specifically, the Obligors agreed to waive any claims against YA, and released
any such claims the Obligors may have had. The Obligors also ratified their
respective obligations under the Financing Documents, and agreed to the
satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including the following: payment
of certain funds to YA at the time of execution of the A&R Forbearance
Agreement; the entry by Iehab Hawatmeh, President of the Company, into a
Guaranty Agreement and a Pledge Agreement (both discussed below); the entry into
a Ratification and Joinder Agreement by the Obligors (discussed below); the
execution of a confession of judgment in a litigation matter between YA, the
Company, and Katana Electronics, LLC ("Katana"); and the delivery of a new
warrant (the "Warrant") to YA (discussed below).
Additionally, the Obligors agreed to seek to obtain waivers from their
respective landlords at their properties in Utah and Arkansas; agreed to seek to
obtain deposit account control agreements from the Company's banks and
depository institutions; and to repay the Company's obligations under the
Debentures on the following schedule:
i. $225,000.00, on or before the date of the A&R Forbearance Agreement
to be applied as follows (x) $75,000.00 in reimbursement of the
legal fees and expenses incurred by the Lender as required by
Paragraph 18, below, and (y) $150,000.00 applied first to accrued
but unpaid interest and then to the principal balance of the
Obligations;
ii. $75,000.00 on February 1, 2011;
iii. $75,000.00 on March 1, 2011;
iv. $75,000.00 on April 1, 2011;
v. $200,000.00 on May 1, 2011;
vi. $200,000.00 on June 1, 2011;
vii. $200,000.00 on July 1, 2011;
viii. $200,000.00 on August 1, 2011;
ix. $200,000.00 on September 1, 2011;
x. $200,000.00 on October 1, 2011;
xi. $200,000.00 on November 1, 2011;
xii. $200,000.00 on December 1, 2011; and
xiii. the remaining balance of the Obligations shall be paid in full in
good and collected funds by federal funds wire transfer on or before
the earlier of (i) the occurrence of a Termination Event (as defined
in the A&R Forbearance Agreement), or (ii) 3:00 P.M. (prevailing
Eastern time) on December 31, 2011 (the "Termination Date").
We made our required payments through March 1, 2011 as required under the
schedule above. As of the date of this report we had not made the required April
1, 2011 payment.
Pursuant to the A&R Forbearance Agreement, the parties agreed that the Company,
subject to the consent of YA, may choose to pay all or any portion of the
payments listed above in common stock, with the conversion price to be used to
determine the number of shares of common stock being equal to 85% of the lowest
closing bid price of the Company's common stock during the ten trading days
prior to the payment date.
In exchange for the satisfaction of such conditions and agreements from the
Obligors, YA agreed to forbear from enforcing its rights and remedies as a
result of the existing defaults and/or converting the Debentures into shares of
the Company's common stock, until the earlier of (i) the occurrence of a
Termination Event (as defined in the A&R Forbearance Agreement), or (ii) the
Termination Date, which is given as December 31, 2011. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, nothing contained in the A&R Forbearance Agreement or the other
Forbearance Documents will be deemed to constitute a waiver by YA of any default
or event of default, whether now existing or hereafter arising (including,
without limitation, the existing defaults listed in the A&R Forbearance
Agreement), and/or its right to convert the Debentures into shares of the
Company's common stock.
Guaranty Agreement and Pledge Agreement
In connection with the A&R Forbearance Agreement, Mr. Hawatmeh entered into a
Guaranty Agreement and a Pledge Agreement. Pursuant to the Guaranty Agreement,
Mr. Hawatmeh agreed to guarantee to YA the full payment and prompt performance
of all of the obligations in the A&R Forbearance Agreement. Pursuant to the
Pledge Agreement, Mr. Hawatmeh agreed to pledge a first priority security
interest in one-half of his membership units in Play Beverages, LLC ("PlayBev")
to secure the payment of the obligations under the A&R Forbearance Agreement and
the Guaranty Agreement.
14
Ratification and Joinder to Collateral Agreements
The Company, CirTran Sub, and the other Obligors also entered into a
Ratification and Joinder to Collateral Agreements, pursuant to which CirTran Sub
agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of, and to be a party to, the
Global Security Agreement (entered into in connection with the Prior Forbearance
Agreement) and the Global Guaranty Agreement (entered into in connection with
the Prior Forbearance Agreement). (The terms of the Global Guaranty Agreement
and the Global Security Agreement were described in, and attached as exhibits
to, the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 17,
2009. For a more complete description of these agreements, please see that
filing.)
Warrant to Purchase Common Stock
Finally, the Company agreed to issue a new warrant (the "Warrant") to purchase
up to 25,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The exercise price of the
Warrant is $0.02 per share, subject to adjustment as described in the Warrant,
and includes a cashless exercise provision. The Warrant expires on December 31,
2015.
COMPETITION
We believe that the primary basis of competition in our targeted markets is
manufacturing technology, quality, responsiveness, the provision of value-added
services and price. To remain competitive, we must continue to provide
technologically advanced manufacturing services, maintain quality levels, offer
flexible delivery schedules, deliver finished products on a reliable basis and
compete favorably on the basis of price.
Furthermore, management feels that the Company's manufacturing facilities for
its beverage division are strategically positioned to hedge against unforeseen
obstacles by having multiple manufacturing facilities for its beverage division
Additionally, the beverage industry is highly competitive. Our energy drinks
compete with others in the marketplace in terms of pricing, packaging,
development of new products and flavors and marketing campaigns. These products
compete with a wide range of drinks produced by a relatively large number of
manufacturers, most of which have substantially greater financial, marketing and
distribution resources than we do.
We believe that factors affecting our ability to compete successfully in the
beverage industry include taste and flavor of products, strong recognition of
the Playboy brand and related branded product advertising, industry and consumer
promotions, attractive and different packaging, and pricing. We also compete for
distributors; most of our distributors also sell products manufactured by our
competitors and we will compete for the attention of these distributors to
endeavor to sell our products ahead of those of our competitors, provide stable
and reliable distribution and secure adequate shelf space in retail outlets.
These and other competitive pressures in the energy beverage category could
cause our products to be unable to gain or to lose market share or we could
experience price erosion, which could have a material adverse affect on our
business and results.
We compete not only for consumer acceptance, but also for maximum marketing
efforts by multi-brand licensed bottlers, brokers and distributors, many of
which have a principal affiliation with competing companies and brands. Our
products compete with all liquid refreshments and with products of much larger
and substantially better financed competitors, including the products of
numerous nationally and internationally known producers and include products
such as Hansen's energy, Diet Red, Monster Energy, Lost Energy, Joker Mad
Energy, Ace Energy, Unbound Energy, Rumba energy juice, Red Bull, Rockstar, Full
Throttle, No Fear, Amp, Adrenaline Rush, 180, Extreme Energy Shot, Red Devil,
Rip It, NOS, Boo Koo, Vitaminenergy, and many other brands. We also compete with
companies that are smaller or primarily local in operation. Our products also
compete with private label brands such as those carried by grocery store chains,
convenience store chains and club stores.
15
The electronic manufacturing services industry is large and diverse and is
serviced by many companies, including several that have achieved significant
market share. Because of our market's size and diversity, we do not typically
compete for contracts with a discreet group of competitors. We compete with
different companies depending on the type of service or geographic area. Certain
of our competitors have greater manufacturing, financial, research and
development and marketing resources. We also face competition from current and
prospective customers that evaluate our capabilities against the merits of
manufacturing products internally
REGULATION
We are subject to typical federal, state and local regulations and laws
governing the operations of manufacturing concerns, including environmental
disposal, storage and discharge regulations and laws, employee safety laws and
regulations and labor practices laws and regulations. We are not required under
current laws and regulations to obtain or maintain any specialized or
agency-specific licenses, permits, or authorizations to conduct our
manufacturing services. We believe we are in substantial compliance with all
relevant regulations applicable to our business and operations. All
international sales permits are the responsibility of the local distributors and
they are required to obtain all local licenses and permits.
EMPLOYEES
As of April 15, 2011 we employed a total staff of 13 persons in the United
States. In addition, we employ approximately 75 employees through contract
services to provide promotional activities in the US. In our Salt Lake
headquarters, we employed 6 persons: 4 in administrative and clerical positions,
and 1 each in sales and project management. In our Los Angeles office, we
employed 1 person in marketing. In our Bentonville sales office, we employed one
person in sales. In Nevada, we employed one in administration and quality
control. We also employed additional sales representatives in New Jersey,
Michigan and Arkansas. We believe that our relationship with our employees is
good.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 that reflect our current expectations about our future
results, performance, prospects and opportunities. These forward-looking
statements are subject to significant risks, uncertainties, and other factors,
including those identified in "Risk Factors" below, which may cause actual
results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any
forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements within this Form 10-K
may be identified by words such as "believes," "feels," "anticipates,"
"expects," "intends," "may," "would," "will" and other similar expressions.
However, these words are not the exclusive means of identifying these
statements. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections
or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking
statements. Except as expressly required by the federal securities laws, we
undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring subsequent to the filing
of this Form 10-K with the SEC or for any other reason. You should carefully
review and consider the various disclosures we make in this Report and our other
reports filed with the SEC that attempt to advise interested parties of the
risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect our business.
Where You Can Obtain Additional Information
Federal securities laws require us to file information with the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC") concerning our business and operations. Accordingly,
we file annual, quarterly, and interim reports, and other information with the
SEC. You can inspect and copy this information at the public reference facility
maintained by the SEC at Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Room 1024, and
Washington, D.C. 20549. You can get additional information about the operation
of the SEC's public reference facilities by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains a web site (http://www.sec.gov) at which you can read or
download our reports and other information.
Our internet addresses are www.cirtran.com and www.racore.com. Information on
our websites is not incorporated by reference herein. We make available free of
charge through our corporate website, www.cirtran.com, our annual report on Form
10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all
amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such
material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.
16
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
On May 4, 2007, we entered into a ten-year lease agreement for our existing
40,000 square-foot headquarters and manufacturing facility, located at 4125
South 6000 West in West Valley City, Utah (the "Premises"). Monthly payments are
$10,000, adjusted annually in accordance with the Consumer Price Index. The
Premises workspace includes 10,000 square feet of office space to support
administration, sales, and engineering staff. The 30,000 square feet of
manufacturing space includes a secured inventory area, shipping and receiving
areas, and manufacturing and assembly space.
In 2010, in connection with the Agreement between the Company and Katana
(described above), the Company entered into a Sublease Agreement with Katana
(the "Sublease"). Pursuant to the terms of the Sublease, the Company will
sublease a certain portion of the premises to Katana consisting of the
warehouse, electronics product manufacturing and assembly area, and office space
used as of the close of business on March 4, 2010, for the legacy electronics
manufacturing business of the Company.
The term of the Sublease is for two (2) months with automatic renewal periods of
one month each. The base rent under the Sublease is $8,500 per month. The
Sublease contains normal and customary use restrictions, indemnification rights
and obligations, default provisions and termination rights.
Century City, California
In November 2007, we began occupying approximately 1,260 square feet of
commercial space in the Century City district of Los Angeles. The three-year
lease calls for payments of $3,525 per month. The Company closed this office and
discontinued this lease during 2010 but intends to relocate to another location
in 2011.
Bentonville, Arkansas
In November 2006, we signed a two-year lease on a 1,150 square-foot facility in
Bentonville, Arkansas, in close proximity to Wal-Mart's world headquarters.
Lease payments during the two-year lease term have been $1,470 per month. We
entered into a new lease agreement, beginning in November 2008 for a 600
square-foot facility at a new location in Bentonville. Lease payments for the
two year lease are $715 per month. As the contract period has expired on this
lease, it is on a month-to-month basis.
We believe that the facilities and equipment described above are generally in
good condition, are well maintained, and are generally suitable and adequate for
our current and projected operating needs.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Advanced Beauty Solutions, LLC, v. CirTran Corporation, Case
No.1:08-ap-01363-GM. In connection with prior litigation between Advanced Beauty
Solutions ("ABS") and the Company, ABS claimed non-performance by the Company
and filed an adversary proceeding in ABS's bankruptcy case proceeding in the
United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California, and San Fernando
Valley Division. On March 17, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court entered judgment in
favor of ABS and against the Company in the amount of $1,811,667 plus interest.
On September 11, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court denied the Company's motion to set
aside the judgment. As of the date of this report, ABS is pursuing collection
efforts on this judgment.
On September 8, 2010, the Company executed an Assignment of Copyrights, thereby
assigning the Company's Copyright Registration No. TX-6-064-955, Copyright
Registration No. TX-6-064-956, and Copyright to the True Ceramic Pro - Live Ops
(TCPS) infomercial and related master tapes (collectively the "Copyrights") to
ABS. The Company assigned and transferred the Copyrights without reservation or
exclusion, making ABS the owner of the Copyrights. On February 23, 2011, the
Company filed a Motion to Declare Judgment Fully Satisfied or Alternatively to
Recoup Mutual Debts, requesting that the Court determine that the Company's
assignment of the Copyrights resulted in full satisfaction of the ABS judgment.
On March 3, 2011, ABS brought a Motion for Order to Show Cause re Civil Contempt
by the Company and CirTran Beverage Corp., CirTran Products Corp., CirTran Media
Corp., and Iehab Hawatmeh, alleging that the Company had failed to make payments
on ABS's judgment in violation of the Court's orders.
17
On April 6, 2011, the Court held a hearing on (1) the Company's Motion to
Declare Judgment Fully Satisfied or Alternatively to Recoup Mutual Debts; and
(2) ABS's Motion for an Order to Show Cause re Civil Contempt. The Court denied
the Company's Motion to declare the judgment fully satisfied, but did not hold
the Company in civil contempt. As of the date of this Report, the Company was
reviewing its options with respect to how to proceed.
Apex Maritime Co. (LAX), Inc. v. CirTran Corporation, CirTran Asia, Inc., et
al., California Superior Court, Los Angeles County, SC098148. Plaintiff Apex
Maritime Co. (LAX), Inc. ("Apex") filed a complaint on May 8, 2008, against the
Company and CirTran Asia, the Company's subsidiary, claiming breach of contract,
nonpayment on open book account, non-payment of an account stated, and
non-payment for services, seeking approximately $62,000 against the Company and
$121,000 against CirTran Asia. The Company and CirTran Asia answered on June 9,
2008. The parties subsequently entered into a Release and Settlement Agreement
pursuant to which the Company and CirTran Asia agreed to pay an aggregate of
$195,000 in monthly payments. In the event of default under the Release and
Settlement Agreement, the Plaintiffs could file a Stipulation for Entry of
Judgment in the amount of $195,000, minus any amounts paid under the Release and
Settlement Agreement. On February 26, 2009, the Stipulation of Judgment was
filed, granting the California court jurisdiction to enforce the Release and
Settlement Agreement. On March 3, 2009, the court entered its judgment pursuant
to the Release and Settlement Agreement. On April 23, 2009, a Judgment Enforcing
Settlement was entered against CirTran Corporation and CirTran Asia, Inc.,
jointly and severally in the principal amount of $173,000, plus fees of $1,800
and costs of $40. On October 28, 2009, the Third Judicial District Court,
District of Utah, West Jordan Department, entered an Order in Supplemental
Proceedings, with which the Company complied. The parties have previously
engaged in settlement negotiations. The Company has accrued $173,000,as a
liability, related to this claim.
Fortune Resources LLC v. CirTran Beverage Corp, Civil No. 090401259, Third
Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, State of Utah. On February 5, 2009,
the plaintiff filed a complaint against CirTran Beverage, claiming non-payment
for goods in the amount of $121,135. CirTran Beverage filed its answer on
March10, 2009, denying the allegations in the Complaint. CirTran Beverage and
Fortune Resources engaged in settlement negotiations, and on May 3, 2010,
pursuant to which Fortune Resources agreed to dismiss the suit upon receipt from
CirTran of $50,000 pursuant to a payment schedule. As of August 22, 2010, the
Company has made its scheduled payments timely. The Plaintiff has filed a
request for entry of judgment against CirTran, claiming that CirTran failed to
make the required payments. These amounts have been accrued in full as a
liability. An Order for Supplementary Proceedings was entered on January 12,
2011. The proceedings have been continued without date.
Global Freight Forwarders v. CirTran Asia, Civil No. 080925731, Third Judicial
District Court, Salt Lake County, State of Utah. On December 18, 2008, the
plaintiff filed a complaint against CirTran Asia, claiming breach of contract,
breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment,
seeking approximately $260,000. The Complaint was served on CirTran Asia on
January 5, 2009. On February 12, 2009, CirTran Asia filed its answer.
Thereafter, CirTran Asia filed an amended answer and counterclaim. Discovery is
complete, and the plaintiff filed a certificate of readiness for trial with the
Court. The Parties have engaged in settlement negotiations, and have reached a
tentative agreement, but a final written settlement agreement had not been
executed as of the date of this Report. The Company has accrued $91,460, as a
liability, related to this claim.
Dr. Najib Bouz v. CirTran Beverage Corp, Iehab Hawatmeh and Does 1-20, Superior
Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Civil No. KC053818. On
September 12, 2008, the plaintiff filed a complaint, seeking a judgment for
$52,500 plus attorneys' fees and certain costs, against CirTran Beverage, Iehab
Hawatmeh and unnamed others, claiming breach of contract and fraud in connection
with a certain promissory note. CirTran Beverage and Mr. Hawatmeh answered,
denying liability. On August 11, 2009, the parties entered into a settlement
agreement whereby the claims against Mr. Hawatmeh were dismissed with prejudice,
and the Company agreed to pay Dr. Bouz $63,000 over a twelve month period. The
Company has made 9 monthly payments but is in default of the $5,250 monthly
payments that were due on May 28, 2010, June 28, 2010, and July 28, 2010 These
amounts have been accrued in full as a liability.
18
Dr. Paul Bouz v. CirTran Beverage Corp, Iehab Hawatmeh and Does 1-20, Superior
Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Civil No. KC053819. On
September 12, 2008, the plaintiff filed a complaint, seeking a judgment for
$52,500 plus attorneys' fees and certain costs, against CirTran Beverage, Iehab
Hawatmeh and unnamed others, claiming breach of contract and fraud in connection
with a certain promissory note. CirTran Beverage and Mr. Hawatmeh answered,
denying liability. On August 11, 2009, the parties entered into a settlement
agreement whereby the claims against Mr. Hawatmeh were dismissed with prejudice,
and the Company agreed to pay Dr. Bouz $63,000 over a twelve month period. The
Company has made 10 monthly payments but is in default of the $5,250 monthly
payments that were due on June 28, 2010, and July 28, 2010. These amounts have
been accrued in full as a liability.
NA CL&D Graphics v. CirTran Beverage Corp., Case No. 09V01154, Circuit Ct,
Waukesha County, Wisconsin. On or about March 23, 2009, CL&D filed an action in
the above court, alleging claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment,
promissory estoppel, and seeking damages of at least $25,488 along with
attorneys' fees and costs. CirTran Beverage Corp is reviewing the matter and
intends to defend vigorously against the allegations in the complaint. These
amounts have been accrued in full as a liability.
Old Dominion Freight Line v. CirTran Corporation, Civil No. 090426290, Third
Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, State of Utah. On May 5, 2010, the
Court entered an Order in Supplemental Proceedings in connection with a judgment
in favor of Old Dominion and against CirTran in the amount of $33,187. The
parties agreed to resolve this matter under terms requiring CirTran to pay
$20,000 over time. To date, the required payments have not been made. These
amounts have been accrued in full as a liability.
YA Global Investments, LP v. CirTran Corporation, Third Judicial District Court
of Salt Lake County, State of Utah, case no. 100911400. On January 24, 2011, the
Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement with YA Global Investments, LP
("YA"), including a confession of judgment in favor of YA. On February 23, 2011,
the court entered judgment based on the confession of judgment against the
Company in the amount of $3,161,354 in principal, plus $825,858.17 in interest.
These amounts have been accrued in full as a liability.
LIB-MP Beverage, LLC v. PlayBeverages, LLC, CirTran Beverage Corporation,
CirTran Corporation, Iehab Hawatmeh, and Fadi Nora, United States District
Court, Central District of California, Case No. CV10-2814. On March 25, 2010,
LIB-MP Beverages, LLC, filed a complaint asserting claims for fraud, specific
performance, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith
and fair dealing, declaratory relief and accounting (the "California
Litigation"). The amount of damages claimed in the California Litigation was not
specified. On April 29, 2010, the Company filed claims against LIB-MP Beverage,
LLC, American Sales & Merchandising, LLC, Warner Depuy, Michael Liberty and
Jeffrey Pollack in the Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, State of
Utah, seeking a declaratory judgment on the claims asserted in the California
litigation, and further asserting claims for tortious interference with
contractual relations, breaches of fiduciary duties, fraud and negligent
misrepresentations. On June 21, 2010, the complaint filed in the California
Litigation was dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.
Jimmy Esebag v. CirTran Corporation and Fadi Nora, Superior Court of the State
of California, Los Angeles County, Case No. BC296162. On July 15, 2010, the
court entered judgment against the Company in the amount of $68,270 based upon
the Company's failure to make payments when due under a settlement with Mr.
Esebag. The Company has accrued $59,769, as a liability related to this claim.
Desiree Liston v. CirTran Media Corp. d/b/a Diverse Media Group Corp., Circuit
Court of Benton County, Arkansas, Case No. CV2010-2448-6. On July 28, 2010,
Desiree Liston filed a complaint seeking an unspecified amount in excess of
$75,000 based on allegations of breach of an Employment Agreement. The Company
has filed its answer. The Company believes that this claim has no merit and
intends to defend it vigorously.
Gordon Jensen, d/b/a Gordon Jensen Trucking v. CirTran Corp., Third Judicial
District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah, case no.108900934. On May 28,
2010, plaintiff brought an action seeking $7,145 for nonpayment of services.
Judgment was entered against CirTran on October 7, 2010, for $6,703. The Company
has accrued $2,745, as a liability, related to this claim.
19
General Distributors, Inc., v. Iehab Hawatmeh and CirTran Beverage Corp., dba
Play Beverages LLC dba Playboy Beverages, in the Circuit Court of the State of
Oregon, for the County of Clackamas, Case No. CV 10110087. On November 8, 2010,
General Distributors, Inc., filed a complaint asserting claims for breach of
contract, liability under the Uniform Commercial Code, quasi contract - unjust
enrichment, goods sold and delivered, account state, and attorneys fees. The
complaint seeks judgment in the amount of $49,999 plus interest and attorneys
fees. The Company and the other defendants have answered the complaint and deny
liability.
Playtime Distributing of Oklahoma LLC v. CirTran Corporation, CirTran Beverage
Corporation, and PlayBeverages LLC, in the District Court of Oklahoma County,
State of Oklahoma, Case No. CJ-2010-1058. On December 30, 2010, Playtime
Distributing of Oklahoma LLC filed suit asserting claims for breach of a
distribution agreement, bad faith breach of a distribution agreement, rescission
of the distribution agreement, accounting, breach of an independent sales
agreement, bad faith breach of an independent sales agreement, and punitive
damages. The petition seeks judgment in an unspecified amount in excess of
$75,000, plus interest and attorneys fees. The Company and the other defendants
have answered and deny liability.
USS Cal Builders, Inc. v, CirTran Beverage Corp., Iehab Hawatmeh, and Fadi Nora,
in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange, Case No.
00425093. On November 16, 2010, USS Cal Builders, Inc., filed a complaint
asserting various claims which were challenged by the Company. On February 8,
2011, USS Cal Builders, Inc., replaced its original complaint with an amended
complaint, in which it asserts claims for breach of promissory note, breach of
oral contract, common count money had and received, and common count money lent.
The amended complaint seeks damages in the sum of at least $100,000 plus
interest, costs, and attorneys fees. The Company and the individual defendants
deny liability and intend to defend the claims.
RDS Touring and Promotions, Inc. v. CirTran Beverage Corp., CirTran Corp., and
CirTran Media Corp., in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of
Los Angeles, Case No. BC454112. On January 31, 2011, RDS Touring and Promotions,
Inc., filed a complaint asserting claims for breach of settlement agreement,
fraud in the inducement, and fraud and deceit (false promise). The Company has
filed a motion to dismiss the fraud claims and the contract claim against all
defendants other than the Company. The Company disputes the allegations of
fraud. The Company does not deny that it is currently in breach of the
settlement agreement.
American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., v. CirTran Corporation,
dba Diverse Media Group and Iehab Hawatmeh, in the Third District Court, State
of Utah, Salt Lake County. In this action, American Express asserts a claim for
$108,029.38 in principal and $24,269.62 in interest due on a credit card
account. The Company denies liability and intends to defend the claim.
Ayad Jaber, Ramzy Fakhoury, Haya Enterprises, LLC. V. CirTran Beverage
Corporation, Play Beverages LLC, Iehab Hawatmeh, and Fadi Nora, in the Superior
Court of the State of California, County of Orange, Case No. 0443807. On January
24, 2011, these plaintiffs filed a complaint asserting claims based on alleged
breaches of various written and oral promises, seeking damages of $700,000 in
principal from the Company, plus $1,219,520 in principal from all defendants,
plus $200,000 from Fadi Nora, plus other unspecified amounts. Company intends to
deny claims and file counter claims.
PART II
ITEM 4. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is traded in the over-the-counter market. The following table
sets forth for the respective periods indicated the prices of the common stock
in the over-the-counter market, as reported and summarized by the OTC Bulletin
Board. Such prices are based on inter-dealer bid and asked prices, without
markup, markdown, commissions, or adjustments and may not represent actual
transactions. In May 2007, we effected a 1.2-for-1 forward split in the issued
and outstanding common stock. Prices below reflect retroactively the forward
split.
Calendar Quarter Ended High Bid Low Bid
March 31, 2009 $ 0.003 $ 0.001
June 30, 2009 $ 0.006 $ 0.001
September 30, 2009 $ 0.018 $ 0.003
December 31, 2009 $ 0.013 $ 0.006
March 31, 2010 $ 0.008 $ 0.004
June 30, 2010 $ 0.005 $ 0.002
September 30, 2010 $ 0.004 $ 0.002
December 31, 2010 $ 0.003 $ 0.001
20
As of April 15, 2011, we had approximately 3,000 shareholders.
We have not declared any dividends on our common stock since our inception, and
do not intend to declare any such dividends in the foreseeable future. Our
ability to pay dividends is subject to limitations imposed by Nevada law. Under
Nevada law, dividends may be paid to the extent the corporation's assets exceed
its liabilities and it is able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual
course of business.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth information regarding our equity compensation
plans, including the number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of
outstanding options, warrants, and rights; the weighted average exercise price
of the outstanding options, warrants, and rights; and the number of securities
remaining available for issuance under the Company's Stock Plans at April 15,
2010.
Number of securities Weighted-average Number of securities
to be issued upon exercise price of remaining available
exercise of outstanding for future issuance
outstanding options, options, warrants, under equity
Plan Category warrants and rights and rights compensation plans
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equity compensation plans
approved by shareholders 40,200,000 $ 0.014 37,840,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equity compensation plans
not approved by shareholders None None None
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 40,200,000 $ 0.014 37,840,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recent Sales of Securities
There were no sales of securities during 2010. The following sales of securities
occurred during 2009:
We issued shares of our common stock without registering those securities under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Securities Act") as follows:
o During the three months ended March 31, 2009 YA Global chose to
convert $110,000 of the convertible debenture into 65,088,757 shares
of common stock at a price of $.00169, which was the lesser of $0.10
per share or an amount equal to the lowest closing bid price of our
common stock during the twenty trading days immediately preceding
the conversion date, pursuant to the terms of the debenture
agreement.
The shares of common stock were issued without registration under the 1933 Act
in reliance on Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder.
In addition, on July 14, 2009, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase
Agreement with Mr. Nora to purchase 75,000,000 shares of our common stock at a
purchase price of $.003 per share, for a total of $225,000, payable through the
conversion of outstanding loans made by the director us. Mr. Nora and we
acknowledged in the purchase agreement that we did not have sufficient shares to
satisfy the issuances, and agreed that the shares would be issued once we have
sufficient shares to do so. As of December 31 2010, we showed the balance of
$225,000 as an accrued liability on the balance sheet.
21
Also, on July 14, 2009, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with our
president to purchase 50,000,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price
of $.003 per share, for a total amount of $150,000, payable through the
conversion of outstanding loans made by our president to us. Mr. Hawatmeh and we
acknowledged in the purchase agreement that we did not have sufficient shares to
satisfy the issuances, and agreed that the shares would be issued once we have
sufficient shares to do so. As of December 31, 2010, we showed the balance of
$150,000 as an accrued liability on the balance sheet.
Penny Stock Rules
Our shares of common stock are subject to the "penny stock" rules of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and various rules under this Act. In general
terms, "penny stock" is defined as any equity security that has a market price
less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. The rules provide that
any equity security is considered to be a penny stock unless that security is
registered and traded on a national securities exchange meeting specified
criteria set by the SEC, authorized for quotation from the NASDAQ stock market,
issued by a registered investment Company, and excluded from the definition on
the basis of price (at least $5.00 per share), or based on the issuer's net
tangible assets or revenues. In the last case, the issuer's net tangible assets
must exceed $3,000,000 if in continuous operation for at least three years,
$5,000,000 if in operation for less than three years, or the issuer's average
revenues for each of the past three years must exceed $6,000,000.
Trading in shares of penny stock is subject to additional sales practice
requirements for broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to persons other than
established customers and accredited investors. Accredited investors, in
general, include individuals with assets in excess of $1,000,000 or annual
income exceeding $200,000 (or $300,000 together with their spouse), and certain
institutional investors. For transactions covered by these rules, broker-dealers
must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of the security
and must have received the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior
to the purchase. Additionally, for any transaction involving a penny stock, the
rules require the delivery, prior to the first transaction, of a risk disclosure
document relating to the penny stock. A broker-dealer also must disclose the
commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative,
and current quotations for the security. Finally, monthly statements must be
sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stocks. These rules may
restrict the ability of broker-dealers to trade or maintain a market in our
common stock, to the extent it is penny stock, and may affect the ability of
shareholders to sell their shares.
ITEM 5. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not required.
ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION
OVERVIEW
In our U.S. operations, we provide a mix of high and medium size volume turnkey
manufacturing services and products using various high-tech applications for
leading electronics OEMs in the communications, networking, peripherals, gaming,
law enforcement, consumer products, telecommunications, automotive, medical, and
semiconductor industries. Our services include pre-manufacturing, manufacturing
and post-manufacturing services. Our goal is to offer customers the significant
competitive advantages that can be obtained from manufacture outsourcing. We
also market an energy drink under the Playboy brand pursuant to a license
agreement with Playboy Enterprises, Inc. ("Playboy").
We conduct business through multiple subsidiaries and divisions: CirTran USA,
Racore Technology, CirTran Asia, CirTran Products, CirTran Media Group, CirTran
Online, and CirTran Beverage.
CirTran USA accounted for 2 percent and 13 percent of our total revenues during
2010 and 2009, respectively, generated by low-volume electronics assembly
activities consisting primarily of the placement and attachment of electronic
and mechanical components on printed circuit boards and flexible (i.e.,
bendable) cables. On March 5, 2010, the Company and Katana Electronics, LLC, a
Utah limited liability company ("Katana") entered into certain agreements
related to the Company's re-alignment of its legacy electronic manufacturing
business (the "Agreements"). (See Note 18)
22
CirTran Asia manufactures and distributes electronics, consumer products and
general merchandise to companies with international markets. Such sales were 1
percent and 2 percent of our total revenues during 2010 and 2009, respectively.
CirTran Products pursues contract manufacturing relationships in the U.S.
consumer products markets, including licensed merchandise sold in the sports and
entertainment markets. These sales comprised less than 1 percent and 1 percent
of total sales respectively for each of the years ended December 31, 2010 and
2009.
CirTran Media provides end-to-end services to the direct response and
entertainment industries. The Company had no revenues relating to this
subsidiary in 2010 or 2009.
CirTran Online sells products via the internet, and provides services and
support to internet retailers. In conjunction with partner GMA, revenues from
this division were 12 percent and 26 percent of total revenues in 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
CirTran Beverage was organized, in May 2007, to arrange for the manufacture,
marketing and distribution of Playboy-licensed energy drinks, flavored water
beverages, and related merchandise. The Company also entered into an agreement
with PlayBev, a newly consolidated entity, which holds the Playboy license. The
Company provides development and promotional services to PlayBev. The Company
also sold energy drink beverages during 2010 and 2009, which amounted to 85
percent and 18 percent of total sales. Playbev billings for development and
marketing services accounted for 40 percent of total sales for 2009.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - COMPARISON OF YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009
Sales and Cost of Sales
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2010, totaled $9,044,902, as compared
to $9,732,855 for the year ended December 31, 2009. If PlayBev had been
accounted for on a consolidated basis as of December 31, 2009, then sales would
have been $5,956,754 for that year, resulting in a 52 percent increase from 2009
to 2010. The increase is primarily attributable to revenue from international
beverage sales. Net sales in the Contract Manufacturing segment fell $267,882 in
year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009. Net sales
in the Marketing and Media segment fell by $5,255,624 in 2010 as compared to
2009. Beverage Distribution revenue increased to $7,712,492 for the year ended
December 31, 2010, as compared to $1,784,028 for the year ended December 31,
2009. The increase continues to be driven by strong interest internationally for
the Playboy branded energy drinks,
Cost of sales, as a percentage of sales, decreased to 65 percent for the year
ended December 31, 2010, as compared to 98 percent for the prior year ended
December 31, 2009. Consequently, the gross profit margin increased to 35 percent
from 2 percent, respectively, for the same time period. The increase in gross
profit margin is attributable to the continued sales mix shift into the CirTran
Beverage products and services along with the consolidation of PlayBev. The
primary CirTran Online products and services are governed by the arrangement we
have with GMA. Pursuant to our Assignment and Exclusive Services Agreement, we
recognize the revenue collected under the GMA contracts, and remit back to GMA a
management fee approximating their actual costs. This management fee is included
in our cost of revenue.
The following charts present (i) comparisons of sales, cost of sales and gross
profits generated by our four operating segments, i.e., Contract Manufacturing,
Electronics Assembly, Marketing and Media, and Beverage Distribution during 2010
and 2009; and (ii) comparisons during these two years for each segment between
sales generated by pre-existing customers and sales generated by new customers.
23
SEGMENT YEAR SALES COST OF SALES ROYALTY EXPENSE GROSS LOSS / MARGIN
Electronics Assembly 2010 $ 170,444 $ 255,940 $ - $ (85,496)
2009 1,263,335 1,693,245 - (429,910)
Contract Manufacturing 2010 66,880 - - 66,880
2009 334,762 129,755 - 205,007
Marketing / Media 2010 1,095,086 1,037,563 - 57,523
2009 6,350,710 6,021,175 - 329,535
Beverage Distribution 2010 7,712,492 2,352,840 2,257,582 3,102,070
2009 1,784,028 975,820 745,121 63,087
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
During the year ended December 31, 2010, selling, general and administrative
expenses increased by 30 percent as compared to the year ended December 31,
2009. The increase of $1,326,463 in selling, general and administrative expenses
was driven primarily by increased media and promotional expenses, higher labor
related expenses, and an increase in shipping and travel costs.
Non-cash compensation expense
Non-cash compensation expense, resulting from the obligation to grant options to
employees and outside attorneys to purchase common stock, increased to $374,783
during the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $98,281 during the year
ended December 31, 2009. No stock options were granted to employees during the
year ended December 31, 2009 or 2010. The increase in non-cash compensation
expense relates to the vesting of previous granted options and the measurement
of stock options required to be granted per their employment contracts.
Other income and expense
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2010, was $1,177,761 as
compared to $1,221,004 for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of 4
percent. The interest expense recorded in the consolidated statements of
operations combines both accretion expense and interest expense. The decrease in
interest expense was driven by a $210,255 reduction in accretion expense
recorded for the year ending December 31, 2010, as compared to the year ending
December 31, 2009. Derivative accounting treatment of convertible debentures
with embedded derivative features requires accretion of the carrying value of
the convertible debenture until the carrying value equals the face value of the
instrument. During the year ending December 31, 2008, the carrying value of two
of the convertible debenture equaled the face value of the instrument, and as a
result, the accretion treatment ceased prior to 2008 (see Note 15 of the
consolidated financial statements). Interest expense increased to $944,201 for
the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the interest expense of
$777,187 for the year ending December 31, 2009.
Interest income for the year ending December 31, 2010, decreased to $0 as
compared to interest income of $518,600 for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The change is due to the consolidation of PlayBev in the 2010 financials. The
interest income balance has been eliminated in consolidation.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we recorded impairment on our
investment in Diverse Media Group (DTG) of $452,000. As of December 31, 2009 and
2010 the carrying value of the investment DTG stock was $0.
We recorded a loss of $889,297 on our derivative valuation for the year ending
December 31, 2010, as compared to a gain of $100,295 recorded for the year
ending December 31, 2009. The unfavorable swing in the derivative valuation is
primarily the result of factors relating to the differing debt levels of the
underlying convertible securities, together with the varying market values of
our common stock.
As a result of these factors, our overall net loss from operations decreased to
$4,954,638 for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to a net loss of
$5,814,653 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The net loss attributable to
the Company was $2,617,653 for 2010, and a net loss of $2,336,985 was
attributable to a non-controlling equity interest in PlayBev.
24
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have had a history of losses from operations, as our expenses have been
greater than our revenues. Our accumulated deficit was $41,969,908 at December
31, 2010, and $39,140,068 at December 31, 2009. Net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2010, was $4,954,638 as compared to $5,814,653 for the year ended
December 31, 2009. Our current liabilities exceeded our current assets by
$21,140,941 as of December 31, 2010, and by $14,864,374 as of December 31, 2009.
For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we experienced negative cash
flows from operating activities of $688,240 and $485,406, respectively.
Cash
The amount of cash used in operating activities during the year ended December
31, 2010, increased by $202,834, as compared to the year ended December 31,
2009, driven primarily by the reduction of PlayBev-related marketing
expenditures and an increase in prepaid customer deposits relating to
international beverage shipments
Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, increased
$156,883 during the year ended December 31, 2010. We continue to monitor
individual customer accounts and are working to improve collections on trade
accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had $6,955,817 in
related party receivables due from PlayBev. These receivables have been
eliminated with the consolidation for accounting purposes of PlayBev as of
December 31, 2010.
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and short-term debt.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, accounts payable, accrued liabilities
and short-term debt increased by more than $4.3 million to a combined balance of
$14.3 million as of December 31, 2010. The increase was driven by an increase of
$1.8 million in accrued liabilities, $865,000 increase in short term debt and
$700,000 increase in accounts payable. The increase in accounts payable activity
is a result of continued PlayBev-related services performed during the year for
beverage development, distribution and marketing services. At December 31, 2010,
we owed $3,827,538 to various investors from whom we had borrowed funds in the
form of either unsecured or short-term advances.
Liquidity and financing arrangements
We have a history of substantial losses from operations, as well of history of
using rather than providing cash in operations. We had an accumulated deficit of
$41,969,908, along with a total stockholders' deficit of $19,111,797, at
December 31, 2010. In addition, we have used, rather than provided, cash in our
operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, of $688,240 and
$485,406, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2010, our monthly
operating costs and interest expense averaged approximately $608,000 per month.
In conjunction with our efforts to improve our results of operations we are also
actively seeking infusions of capital from investors, and are seeking sources to
repay our existing convertible debentures. In our current financial condition,
it is unlikely that we will be able to obtain additional debt financing. Even if
we did acquire additional debt, we would be required to devote additional cash
flow to servicing the debt and securing the debt with assets. Accordingly, we
are looking to obtain equity financing to meet our anticipated capital needs.
There can be no assurances that we will be successful in obtaining such capital.
If we issue additional shares for debt and/or equity, this will dilute the value
of our common stock and existing shareholders' positions.
There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining more debt
and/or equity financing in the future or that our results of operations will
materially improve in either the short or the long term. If we fail to obtain
such financing and improve our results of operations, we will be unable to meet
our obligations as they become due. That would raise substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern.
25
Convertible Debentures
Highgate House Funds, Ltd. - In May 2005, we entered into an agreement with
Highgate House Funds, Ltd ("Highgate") to issue a $3,750,000, 5 percent Secured
Convertible Debenture (the "Debenture"). The Debenture was originally due
December 2007, and is secured by all of our assets. Highgate extended the
maturity date of the Debenture to December 31, 2008. As of January 1, 2008 the
interest rate increased to 12 percent. On August 11, 2009, we entered into a
forbearance agreement (the "Forbearance Agreement") with YA Global Investment
L.P. ("YA Global"), an assignee of Highgate. We agreed to repay our obligations
under the Debentures per an agreed schedule set forth in the Forbearance
Agreement. As of the December 31, 2010, the Company had paid $3,129,864 in
principal on this note and a balance of $620,136 was outstanding at year end.
Subsequently, on January 24, 2011, the Company, certain of its subsidiaries
listed below, and YA Global Investments (formerly known as Cornell Capital
Partners, LP) ("YA") finalized an amended and restated forbearance agreement
(the "A&R Forbearance Agreement") and related agreements, which related to
certain financing arrangements and agreements between the Company and YA and its
predecessors. The A&R Forbearance Agreement was dated as of January 7, 2011, but
the final conditions for closing were met on January 24, 2011. The Company's
subsidiaries that entered into the A&R Forbearance Agreement were Racore
Network, Inc. (hereinafter, "Racore"); Cirtran - Asia, Inc. (hereinafter,
"Asia"); CirTran Beverage Corp. (hereinafter, "Beverage"); Cirtran Media Corp.
(hereinafter, "Media"); Cirtran Online Corp. (hereinafter, "Online"); Cirtran
Products Corp. (hereinafter, "Products"); and Cirtran Corporation (Utah)
(hereinafter, "Cirtran Sub," and together with Racore, Asia, Beverage, Media,
Online and Products, collectively, jointly and severally, the "Guarantors"). A
more detailed description of the A&R Forbearance Agreement and related
agreements, including the payment schedule and other terms and conditions, can
be found in the section below, "Debentures - A&R Forbearance Agreement," and the
A&R Forbearance Agreement and related exhibits were filed as exhibits to a
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2011.
We determined that certain conversion features of the Debenture fell under
derivative accounting treatment. Since May 2005, the carrying value has been
accreted over the life of the debenture until December 31, 2007, the original
maturity date. As of that date, the carrying value of the Debenture was
$970,136, which was the remaining face value of the debenture.
In connection with the issuance of the Debenture, $2,265,000 of the proceeds was
used to repay earlier promissory notes. Fees of $256,433, withheld from the
proceeds, were capitalized and were amortized over the life of the note.
During 2006, Highgate converted $1,000,000 of Debenture principal and accrued
interest into a total of 37,373,283 shares of common stock. During 2007,
Highgate converted $1,979,864 of Debenture principal and accrued interest into a
total of 264,518,952 shares of common stock. During the year ended December 31,
2008, Highgate converted $350,000 of debenture principle into a total of
36,085,960 shares of common stock. The carrying value of the Debenture as of
December 31, 2010 was $620,136. The fair value of the derivative liability
stemming from the debenture's conversion feature was determined to be $227,392
as of December 31, 2010.
YA Global December Debenture - In December 2005, we entered into an agreement
with YA Global to issue a $1,500,000, 5 percent Secured Convertible Debenture
(the "December Debenture"). The December Debenture was originally due July 30,
2008, and has a security interest in all the Company's assets, subordinate to
the Highgate security interest. YA Global also agreed to extend the maturity
date of the December Debenture to December 31, 2008. As of January 1, 2008 the
interest rate was increased to 12 percent. We agreed to repay our obligations
under the Debentures per an agreed schedule set forth in the Forbearance
Agreement. As of the December 31, 2010, the Company had not paid on the
principal on this note and a balance of $1,500,000 was outstanding at year end.
Subsequently, on January 24, 2011, the Company, certain of its subsidiaries
listed below, and YA Global Investments (formerly known as Cornell Capital
Partners, LP) ("YA") finalized an amended and restated forbearance agreement
(the "A&R Forbearance Agreement") and related agreements, which related to
certain financing arrangements and agreements between the Company and YA and its
predecessors. The A&R Forbearance Agreement was dated as of January 7, 2011, but
the final conditions for closing were met on January 24, 2011. The Company's
subsidiaries that entered into the A&R Forbearance Agreement were Racore
26
Network, Inc. (hereinafter, "Racore"); Cirtran - Asia, Inc. (hereinafter,
"Asia"); Cirtran Beverage Corp. (hereinafter, "Beverage"); Cirtran Media Corp.
(hereinafter, "Media"); Cirtran Online Corp. (hereinafter, "Online"); Cirtran
Products Corp. (hereinafter, "Products"); and Cirtran Corporation (Utah)
(hereinafter, "Cirtran Sub," and together with Racore, Asia, Beverage, Media,
Online and Products, collectively, jointly and severally, the "Guarantors"). A
more detailed description of the A&R Forbearance Agreement and related
agreements, including the payment schedule and other terms and conditions, can
be found in the section below, "Debentures - A&R Forbearance Agreement," and the
A&R Forbearance Agreement and related exhibits were filed as exhibits to a
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2011.
The YA Global Debenture was issued with 10,000,000 warrants, with an exercise
price of $0.09 per share. The warrants vest immediately and have a three-year
life. As a result of the May 2007 1.2-for1 forward stock split, the effective
number of vested warrants increased to 12,000,000. On December 31, 2008, all
12,000,000 warrants have expired.
In connection with the A&R Forbearance Agreement, the Company agreed to issue a
new warrant (the "Warrant") to purchase up to 25,000,000 shares of the Company's
common stock. The exercise price of the Warrant is $0.02 per share, subject to
adjustment as described in the Warrant, and includes a cashless exercise
provision. The Warrant expires on December 31, 2015.
We determined that the conversion features on the December Debenture and the
associated warrants fell under derivative accounting treatment. The carrying
value was accreted over the life of the December Debenture until August 31,
2008, a former maturity date, at which time the value of the December Debenture
reached $1,500,000.
In connection with the issuance of the December Debenture, fees of $130,000,
withheld from the proceeds, were capitalized and are being amortized over the
life of the December Debenture.
As of December 31, 2010, YA Global had not converted any of the December
Debenture into shares of the Company's common stock. As a result, the carrying
value of the debenture as of December 31, 2010, remains $1,500,000. The fair
value of the derivative liability stemming from the December Debenture's
conversion feature as of December 30, 2010, was determined to be $600,015.
YA Global August Debenture - In August 2006, we entered into another agreement
with YA Global relating to the issuance by the Company of another 5 percent
Secured Convertible Debenture, due in April 2009, in the principal amount of
$1,500,000 (the "August Debenture"). We agreed to repay our obligations under
the Debentures per an agreed schedule set forth in the Forbearance Agreement. As
of the December 31, 2010, the Company had paid $458,782 in principal on this
note and a balance of $1,041,218 was outstanding at year end.
Subsequently, on January 24, 2011, the Company, certain of its subsidiaries
listed below, and YA Global Investments (formerly known as Cornell Capital
Partners, LP) ("YA") finalized an amended and restated forbearance agreement
(the "A&R Forbearance Agreement") and related agreements, which related to
certain financing arrangements and agreements between the Company and YA and its
predecessors. The A&R Forbearance Agreement was dated as of January 7, 2011, but
the final conditions for closing were met on January 24, 2011. The Company's
subsidiaries that entered into the A&R Forbearance Agreement were Racore
Network, Inc. (hereinafter, "Racore"); Cirtran - Asia, Inc. (hereinafter,
"Asia"); Cirtran Beverage Corp. (hereinafter, "Beverage"); Cirtran Media Corp.
(hereinafter, "Media"); Cirtran Online Corp. (hereinafter, "Online"); Cirtran
Products Corp. (hereinafter, "Products"); and Cirtran Corporation (Utah)
(hereinafter, "Cirtran Sub," and together with Racore, Asia, Beverage, Media,
Online and Products, collectively, jointly and severally, the "Guarantors"). A
more detailed description of the A&R Forbearance Agreement and related
agreements, including the payment schedule and other terms and conditions, can
be found in the section below, "Debentures - A&R Forbearance Agreement," and the
A&R Forbearance Agreement and related exhibits were filed as exhibits to a
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2011.
In connection with the August Purchase Agreement, we also agreed to grant to YA
Global warrants (the "Warrants") to purchase up to an additional 15,000,000
shares of our common stock. The Warrants have an exercise price of $0.06 per
share, and originally were to expire three years from the date of issuance. In
connection with the Forbearance Agreement, the term of these warrants was
extended to August 23, 2010. As noted above, in connection with the A&R
Forbearance Agreement, the Company agreed to issue a new warrant (the "Warrant")
to purchase up to 25,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock.
27
We determined that the conversion features on the August Debenture and the
associated warrants fell under derivative accounting treatment. The carrying
value will be accreted each quarter over the life of the August Debenture until
the carrying value equals the face value of $1,500,000. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, YA Global chose to convert $341,160 of the convertible
debenture into 139,136,360 shares of common stock.
YA Global chose to convert $117,622 of the convertible debenture into 72,710,337
shares of common stock during the year ended December 31, 2009. As of December
31, 2010, the carrying value of the August Debenture was $1,041,218. The fair
value of the derivative liability arising from the August Debenture's conversion
feature and warrants was $511,785 as of December 31, 2010.
In connection with the issuance of the August Debenture, fees of $135,000,
withheld from the proceeds, were capitalized and are being amortized over the
life of the August Debenture.
Please see the section below, "Debentures - A&R Forbearance Agreement," for a
more complete discussion of the A&R Forbearance Agreement.
Debentures - A&R Forbearance Agreement.
On January 24, 2011, the Company, certain of its subsidiaries listed below, and
YA Global Investments (formerly known as Cornell Capital Partners, LP) ("YA")
finalized an amended and restated forbearance agreement (the "A&R Forbearance
Agreement") and related agreements, which related to certain financing
arrangements and agreements between the Company and YA and its predecessors. The
A&R Forbearance Agreement was dated as of January 7, 2011, but the final
conditions for closing were met on January 24, 2011.
A&R Forbearance Agreement
An overview and summary of the A&R Forbearance Agreement between the Company and
YA, together with other agreements entered into in connection with the A&R
Forbearance Agreement, follows. The summaries of the terms and conditions of the
A&R Forbearance Agreement and the other agreements do not purport to be
complete, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of
the agreements which were filed as exhibits to a Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on January 28, 2011.
The A&R Forbearance Agreement related specifically to three debentures issued by
the Company to YA or its predecessor entities: a May 26, 2005, debenture in the
principal amount of $3,750,000 (the "May Debenture"), a December 30, 2005,
debenture in the principal amount of $1,500,000 (the "December Debenture"), and
an August 23, 2006, debenture in the principal amount of $1,500,000 (the "August
Debenture," and collectively with the May Debenture and the December Debentures,
the "Debentures"), together with certain other agreements entered into in
connection with the issuance of the Debentures (collectively, the "Financing
Documents").
The parties to the A&R Forbearance Agreement are the Company; YA; and the
following subsidiaries of the Company: Racore Network, Inc. (hereinafter,
"Racore"); Cirtran - Asia, Inc. (hereinafter, "Asia"); CirTran Beverage Corp.
(hereinafter, "Beverage"); Cirtran Media Corp. (hereinafter, "Media"); Cirtran
Online Corp. (hereinafter, "Online"); Cirtran Products Corp. (hereinafter,
"Products"); and Cirtran Corporation (Utah) (hereinafter, "Cirtran Sub," and
together with Racore, Asia, Beverage, Media, Online and Products, collectively,
jointly and severally, the "Guarantors"). The A&R Forbearance Agreement
references certain events of default under the Financing Documents, and notes
that the Company and the Guarantors (collectively, the "Obligors") had requested
that YA forbear from enforcing its rights and remedies under the Financing
Documents, and sets for the agreement between the Obligors and YA with respect
to such forbearance.
Specifically, the Obligors agreed to waive any claims against YA, and released
any such claims the Obligors may have had. The Obligors also ratified their
respective obligations under the Financing Documents, and agreed to the
satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including the following: payment
of certain funds to YA at the time of execution of the A&R Forbearance
Agreement; the entry by Iehab Hawatmeh, President of the Company, into a
Guaranty Agreement and a Pledge Agreement (both discussed below); the entry into
a Ratification and Joinder Agreement by the Obligors (discussed below); the
execution of a confession of judgment in a litigation matter between YA, the
Company, and Katana Electronics, LLC ("Katana"); and the delivery of a new
warrant (the "Warrant") to YA (discussed below).
28
Additionally, the Obligors agreed to seek to obtain waivers from their
respective landlords at their properties in Utah and Arkansas; agreed to seek to
obtain deposit account control agreements from the Company's banks and
depository institutions; and to repay the Company's obligations under the
Debentures on the following schedule:
i. $225,000.00, on or before the date of the A&R Forbearance Agreement
to be applied as follows (x) $75,000.00 in reimbursement of the
legal fees and expenses incurred by the Lender as required by
Paragraph 18, below, and (y) $150,000.00 applied first to accrued
but unpaid interest and then to the principal balance of the
Obligations;
ii. $75,000.00 on February 1, 2011;
iii. $75,000.00 on March 1, 2011;
iv. $75,000.00 on April 1, 2011;
v. $200,000.00 on May 1, 2011;
vi. $200,000.00 on June 1, 2011;
vii. $200,000.00 on July 1, 2011;
viii. $200,000.00 on August 1, 2011;
ix. $200,000.00 on September 1, 2011;
x. $200,000.00 on October 1, 2011;
xi. $200,000.00 on November 1, 2011;
xii. $200,000.00 on December 1, 2011; and
xiii. the remaining balance of the Obligations shall be paid in full in
good and collected funds by federal funds wire transfer on or before
the earlier of (i) the occurrence of a Termination Event (as defined
in the A&R Forbearance Agreement), or (ii) 3:00 P.M. (prevailing
Eastern time) on December 31, 2011 (the "Termination Date").
We made our required payments through March 1, 2011 as required under the
schedule above. As of the date of this report we had not made the required April
1, 2011 payment.
Pursuant to the A&R Forbearance Agreement, the parties agreed that the Company,
subject to the consent of YA, may choose to pay all or any portion of the
payments listed above in common stock, with the conversion price to be used to
determine the number of shares of common stock being equal to 85% of the lowest
closing bid price of the Company's common stock during the ten trading days
prior to the payment date. The amount applied as a payment on the note and
accrued interest will be adjusted to the value of the actual proceeds from the
sale of the stock.
In exchange for the satisfaction of such conditions and agreements from the
Obligors, YA agreed to forbear from enforcing its rights and remedies as a
result of the existing defaults and/or converting the Debentures into shares of
the Company's common stock, until the earlier of (i) the occurrence of a
Termination Event (as defined in the A&R Forbearance Agreement), or (ii) the
Termination Date, which is given as December 31, 2011. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, nothing contained in the A&R Forbearance Agreement or the other
Forbearance Documents will be deemed to constitute a waiver by YA of any default
or event of default, whether now existing or hereafter arising (including,
without limitation, the existing defaults listed in the A&R Forbearance
Agreement), and/or its right to convert the Debentures into shares of the
Company's common stock.
Guaranty Agreement and Pledge Agreement
In connection with the A&R Forbearance Agreement, Mr. Hawatmeh entered into a
Guaranty Agreement and a Pledge Agreement. Pursuant to the Guaranty Agreement,
Mr. Hawatmeh agreed to guarantee to YA the full payment and prompt performance
of all of the obligations in the A&R Forbearance Agreement. Pursuant to the
Pledge Agreement, Mr. Hawatmeh agreed to pledge a first priority security
interest in one-half of his membership units in Play Beverages, LLC ("PlayBev")
to secure the payment of the obligations under the A&R Forbearance Agreement and
the Guaranty Agreement.
29
Ratification and Joinder to Collateral Agreements
The Company, CirTran Sub, and the other Obligors also entered into a
Ratification and Joinder to Collateral Agreements, pursuant to which CirTran Sub
agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of, and to be a party to, the
Global Security Agreement (entered into in connection with the Prior Forbearance
Agreement) and the Global Guaranty Agreement (entered into in connection with
the Prior Forbearance Agreement). (The terms of the Global Guaranty Agreement
and the Global Security Agreement were described in, and attached as exhibits
to, the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 17,
2009. For a more complete description of these agreements, please see that
filing.)
Other Convertible Instruments
We currently have issued and outstanding options, warrants, convertible notes
and other instruments for the acquisition of our common stock in excess of the
available authorized but unissued shares of common stock provided for under our
Articles of Incorporation, as amended. As a consequence, in the event that the
holders of such instruments requiring the issuance, in the aggregate, of a
number of shares of common stock that would, when combined with the previously
issued and outstanding common stock of the Company exceed the authorized capital
of the Company, seek to exercise their rights to acquire shares under those
instruments, we will be required to increase the number of authorized shares or
effect a reverse split of the outstanding shares in order to provide sufficient
shares for issuance under those instruments.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Play Beverages, LLC
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company began to consolidate into its financial
statements the accounts of PlayBev Corporation, formerly an unconsolidated
related party. PlayBev Corporation holds the Playboy license and is
majority-owned by the Company and its related parties. In prior years, PlayBev
was not required to be consolidated due to lack of control over significant
decisions by the Company or its affiliates. However. in the fourth quarter of
2010, the Company reevaluated its relationship with PlayBev and concluded that
it was required to consider whether it had a variable interest in PlayBev.
Management concluded that PlayBev's level of equity was not sufficient to permit
PlayBev to operate on its own without additional subordinated support and that
the Company was the primary beneficiary for accounting purposes.
During 2006, Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. ("Playboy") entered into a
licensing agreement with Play Beverages, LLC ("PlayBev"), then an unrelated
Delaware limited liability company, whereby PlayBev agreed to internationally
market and distribute a new energy drink carrying the Playboy name and "Rabbit
Head" logo symbol. In May 2007, PlayBev entered into an exclusive agreement with
the Company to arrange for the manufacture, marketing and distribution of the
energy drinks, other Playboy-licensed beverages, and related merchandise through
various distribution channels throughout the world.
In an effort to finance the initial development and marketing of the new drink,
the Company with other investors formed After Bev Group LLC ("AfterBev"), a
California limited liability company and partially owned, consolidated
subsidiary of the Company. The Company contributed its expertise in exchange for
an initial 84 percent membership interest in AfterBev. The other initial
AfterBev members contributed $500,000 in exchange for the remaining 16 percent.
The Company borrowed an additional $250,000 from an individual, and contributed
the total $750,000 to PlayBev in exchange for a 51 percent interest in PlayBev's
cash distributions. The Company previously recorded this $750,000 amount as an
investment in PlayBev, accounted for under the cost method. PlayBev then
remitted these funds to Playboy as part of a guaranteed royalty prepayment.
Along with the membership interest granted the Company, PlayBev agreed to
appoint the Company's president and one of the Company's directors to two of
PlayBev's three executive management positions. Additionally, an unrelated
executive manager of PlayBev resigned, leaving the remaining two executive
management positions occupied by the Company president and one of the Company's
directors. On August 23, 2008, PlayBev's members agreed to amend its operating
agreement to change the required membership vote on major managerial and
organizational decisions from 75 percent to 95 percent. Since 2007, the two
affiliates personally purchased membership interests from PlayBev directly and
from other PlayBev members constituting an additional 23.1 percent, which
30
aggregated 34.35 percent. Despite the combined 90.5 percent interest owned by
these affiliates and the Company, the Company cannot unilaterally control
significant operating decisions of PlayBev, as the amended operating agreement
requires that various major operating and organizational decisions be agreed to
by at least 95 percent of all members. The other members of PlayBev are not
affiliated with the Company. In previous years, management concluded that while
PlayBev is a related party, the Company did not have the ability to unilaterally
control significant operating decisions of PlayBev, and therefore had not
accounted for PlayBev's operations as if it was a consolidated subsidiary.
However, on January 1, 2010, the Company adopted ASU 2009-17 (ASC Topic 810,
Consolidation), Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with
Variable Interest Entities. ASU 2009-17 amends the consolidation guidance
applicable to variable interest entities ("VIEs") and requires additional
disclosures concerning an enterprise's continuing involvement with VIEs. The
Company evaluated the impact of this guidance and determined that the adoption
resulted in the December 31, 2010, consolidation of PlayBev.
PlayBev has no operations, so under the terms of the exclusive manufacturing and
distribution agreement, we were appointed as the master manufacturer and
distributor of the beverages and other products that PlayBev licensed from
Playboy. In so doing, we assumed all the risk of collecting amounts owed from
customers, and contracting with vendors for manufacturing and marketing
activities. In addition, PlayBev is owed a royalty from the Company equal to our
gross profits from collected beverage sales, less 20 percent of our related cost
of goods sold, and 6 percent our collected gross sales. We incurred $745,121 in
royalty expenses due to PlayBev during the year ended December 31, 2009. The
intercompany royalty and expense items have been eliminated in the consolidated
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010.
We also agreed to provide services to PlayBev for initial development,
marketing, and promotion of the new beverage. These services are to be billed to
PlayBev and recorded as an account receivable from PlayBev. We initially agreed
to carry up to a maximum of $1,000,000 as a receivable due from PlayBev in
connection with these billed services. On March 19, 2008 we agreed to increase
the maximum amount it would carry as a receivable due from PlayBev, in
connection with these billed services, from $1,000,000 to $3,000,000. As of
March 19, 2008 we also began charging interest on the outstanding amounts owing
at a rate of 7 percent per annum. PlayBev has agreed to repay the receivable and
accrued interest out of the royalties due PlayBev. PlayBev has agreed to repay
the receivable and accrued interest out of the royalties due PlayBev. We have
billed PlayBev for marketing and development services totaling $3,776,101 for
the year ended December 31, 2009, which has been included in revenues for our
marketing and media segment during 2009. As of December 31, 2009, the interest
accrued on the balance owing from PlayBev totaled $735,831. The net amount due
us from PlayBev for marketing and development services, after netting the
royalty owed to PlayBev, totaled $6,955,817 at December 31, 2009. All these
intercompany balances have been eliminated in the consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2010.
AfterBev Group, LLC
Following AfterBev's organization in May 2007, we entered into consulting
agreements with two individuals, one of whom had loaned us $250,000 when we
invested in PlayBev, and the other one was one of our directors. The agreements
provided that we assign to each individual approximately one-third of our share
in future AfterBev cash distributions, in exchange for their assistance in the
initial AfterBev organization and planning, along with their continued
assistance in subsequent beverage development and distribution activities. The
agreements also provided that as we sold a portion of its membership interest in
AfterBev, the individuals would each be owed their proportional assigned share
distributions in the proceeds of such a sale. The actual payment of the
distributions depended on what we did with the sale proceeds. If we used the
proceeds to help finance beverage development and marketing activities, the
payment of distributions would be deferred, pending collections from customers
once beverage product sales eventually commenced. Otherwise, the proportional
assigned share distributions would be due to the two individuals.
Throughout the balance of 2007, as energy drink development and marketing
activities progressed, we raised additional funds by selling portions of its
membership interest in AfterBev to other investors, some of whom were our
stockholders. In some cases, we sold a portion of its membership interest,
including voting rights. In other cases, we sold merely a portion of its share
of future AfterBev profits and losses. By the end of 2007, after taking into
account the two interests it had assigned, we had retained a net 14 percent
interest in AfterBev's profits and losses, but had retained 52 percent of all
voting rights in AfterBev. We recorded the receipt of these net funds as
increases to its existing minority interest in AfterBev, and the rest as amounts
owing as distributable proceeds payable to the two individuals with assigned
interests of our original share of AfterBev.
31
At the end of 2007, we agreed to convert the amount owing to one of the
individuals into a promissory note. In exchange, the individual agreed to
relinquish his approximately one-third portion of our remaining share of
AfterBev's profits and losses. Instead, the individual received a membership
interest in AfterBev. In January 2008, the other assignee, which is one our
directors, similarly agreed to relinquish the distributable proceeds owed to
him, in exchange for an interest in AfterBev's profits and losses. Accordingly,
he purchased a 24 percent interest in AfterBev's profits and losses in exchange
for foregoing $863,973 in amounts due to him. Of this 24 percent, by the end of
December 31, 2008, the director had sold or transferred 23 percent to unrelated
investors and retained the remaining 1 percent interest in AfterBev's profits
and losses. In turn, the director loaned $834,393 to us in the form of unsecured
advances. Of the amounts loaned, $600,000 was used to purchase interest in
PlayBev directly which resulted in a reduction of $600,000 of amounts owed by
PlayBev to us. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the director advanced an
additional $500,000 to us for his purchase of an additional 3 percent interest
in PlayBev, which resulted in a reduction of $500,000 of amounts owed by PlayBev
to us. As of December 31, 2010 we still owed the director $686,999 in the form
of unsecured advance. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2009 one
of our directors and our president purchased 6 percent and 5 percent of AfterBev
shares, respectively, in private sales from existing shareholders of Afterbev.
Global Marketing Alliance
We entered into an agreement with GMA, and hired GMA's owner as the Vice
President of CirTran Online (CTO), one of our subsidiaries. Under the terms of
the agreement, we outsource to GMA the online marketing and sales activities
associated with our CTO products. In return, we provide bookkeeping and
management consulting services to GMA, and pay GMA a fee equal to five percent
of CTO's online net sales. In addition, GMA assigned to us all of its
web-hosting and training contracts effective as of January 1, 2007, along with
the revenue earned thereon, and we also assumed the related contractual
performance obligations. We recognize the revenue collected under the GMA
contracts, and remit back to GMA a management fee approximating their actual
costs. We recognized gross revenues from GMA related products and services in
the amount of $1,095,086 and $2,572,955 for the years ended December 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively.
Transactions involving Officers, Directors, and Stockholders
Don L. Buehner was appointed to our Board of Directors as of October 1, 2007.
For services to be rendered in 2008, we granted Mr. Buehner an option during
2007 to purchase 2,400,000 shares of our common stock. Prior to his appointment
as a director, Mr. Buehner bought the building housing our principal executive
offices in Salt Lake City in a sale/leaseback transaction. The term of the lease
is for 10 years, with an option to extend the lease for up to three additional
five-year terms. We pay Mr. Buehner a monthly lease payment of $10,000, which is
subject to annual adjustments in relation to the Consumer Price Index. We
believe that the amount charged and payable to Mr. Buehner under the lease is
reasonable and in line with local market conditions. Mr. Buehner retired from
our Board of Directors in June 2008.
In connection with the assignment of the Purchase Orders pursuant to the
Assignment Agreement, we entered into a Sublease Agreement with Katana (the
"Sublease"). We lease from Don L. Buehner the real property and its improvements
located at 4125 South 6000 West, West Valley, Utah, 84128 (the "Premises").
Pursuant to the terms of the Sublease, we will sublease a certain portion of the
Premises to Katana consisting of the warehouse, electronics product
manufacturing and assembly area, and office space used as of the close of
business on March 4, 2010, for our legacy electronics manufacturing business.
The term of the Sublease is for two (2) months with automatic renewal periods of
one month each. The base rent under the Sublease is $8,500 per month.
In 2007, we appointed Fadi Nora to our Board of Directors. In addition to
compensation we normally pay to non-employee members of the Board, Mr. Nora is
entitled to a quarterly bonus equal to 0.5 percent of any gross sales earned by
us directly through Mr. Nora's efforts. As of December 31, 2010, we owed $45,826
under this arrangement. Mr. Nora also is entitled to a bonus equal to five
percent of the amount of any investment proceeds received by us that are
directly generated and arranged by him if the following conditions are
satisfied: (i) his sole involvement in the process of obtaining the investment
proceeds is the introduction of the Company to the potential investor, but that
he does not participate in the recommendation, structuring, negotiation,
documentation, or selling of the investment, (ii) neither the Company nor the
investor are otherwise obligated to pay any commissions, finders fees, or
similar compensation to any agent, broker, dealer, underwriter, or finder in
connection with the investment, and (iii) the Board in its sole discretion
determines that the investment qualifies for this bonus, and that the bonus may
be paid with respect to the investment. During 2009 and 2010, Mr. Nora has
received no compensation under this arrangement, and at December 31, 2010, we
did not owe him under the arrangement.
32
In 2007, we also entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Nora, whereby we
assigned to him approximately one-third of our share in future AfterBev cash
distributions. In return, Mr. Nora assisted in the initial AfterBev organization
and planning, and continued to assist in subsequent beverage development and
distribution activities. The agreement also provided that as we sold a portion
of our membership interest in AfterBev, Mr. Nora would be owed his proportional
assigned share distribution in the proceeds of such a sale. Distributable
proceeds due to Mr. Nora at the end of 2007 were $747,290. In January 2008, he
agreed to relinquish this amount, plus an additional $116,683, in exchange for a
24 percent interest in AfterBev's profits and losses. Accordingly, he purchased
a 24 percent interest in AfterBev's profits and losses in exchange for foregoing
$863,973 in amounts due to him. Of this 24 percent, through the end of December
31, 2008, Mr. Nora had sold or transferred 23 percent to unrelated investors and
retained the remaining 1 percent interest in AfterBev's profits and losses. In
turn, Mr. Nora loaned $834,393 to us in the form of unsecured advances. Of the
amounts loaned, $600,000 was used to purchase interest in PlayBev directly which
resulted in a reduction of $600,000 of amounts owed by PlayBev to us. During
2009, Mr. Nora advanced an additional $500,000 to us for his purchase of an
additional 3 percent interest in Playbev, which resulted in a reduction of
$500,000 of amounts owed by PlayBev to us. As of December 31, 2010 we still owed
Mr. Nora $686,999 in the form of unsecured advances. In addition, the Company
owed Mr. Nora $981,046 in accounts payable as of December 31, 2010 for selling,
general and administrative expenses that were paid for by Mr. Nora on a personal
credit card. The Company also owed Mr. Nora $220,000 in PlayBev management fees,
$55,000 in Board of Director fees, and $60,600 in investment commissions.
Prior to his appointment with us, Mr. Nora was also involved in the ANAHOP
private placement of common stock. On April 11, 2008, Mr. Nora disassociated
himself from the other principals of ANAHOP, and as part of the asset settlement
relinquished ownership to the other principals of 12,857,144 shares of our
common stock, along with all of the warrants previously assigned to him.
In 2007, the Company issued a 10 percent promissory note to a family member of
the Company president in exchange for $300,000. The note was due on demand after
May 2008. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company repaid
principal and interest totaling $71,013 and $22,434, respectively. At December
31, 2010, the principal amount owing on the note was $159,442. On March 31,
2008, the Company issued to this same family member, along with four other
Company shareholders, promissory notes totaling $315,000. The family member's
note was for $105,000. Under the terms of all the notes, the Company received
total proceeds of $300,000, and agreed to repay the amount received plus a five
percent borrowing fee. The notes were due April 30, 2008, after which they were
due on demand, with interest accruing at 12 percent per annum. During 2010, the
Company paid $52,500 towards the outstanding notes. The principal balance owing
on the promissory notes as of December 31, 2010, totaled $51,916
During the year ended December 31, 2008, our president advanced the Company
$778,600. Of that amount, $600,000 was used to purchase interest in Playbev
directly which resulted in a reduction of $600,000 of amounts owed by Playbev to
the Company. During 2009 our president advanced an additional $500,000 to the
company for his purchase of an additional 3 percent interest in Playbev, which
resulted in a reduction of $500,000 of amounts owed by Playbev to the Company.
As of December 31, 2010 we owed our President $310,257 in unsecured advances.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Revenue Recognition - Revenue is recognized when products are shipped. Title
passes to the customer or independent sales representative at the time of
shipment. Returns for defective items are repaired and sent back to the
customer. Historically, expenses associated with returns have not been
significant and have been recognized as incurred.
33
Shipping and handling fees are included as part of net sales. The related
freight costs and supplies directly associated with shipping products to
customers are included as a component of cost of goods sold.
Agency fees were recognized when they were earned. This occurred only after the
talent, represented by us, received payment for the services from the buyer. The
buyer remitted funds to a trust checking account after all payroll tax
liabilities had been deducted from the gross amount due the talent. The talent
was paid the net amount, less our commission (which is approximately 10 percent
of the gross amount due the talent), from the trust account. The remainder of
funds in the trust account, typically 10 percent, was then distributed us and
recognized as revenue.
We signed an Assignment and Exclusive Services Agreement with GMA, a related
party, whereby revenues and all associated performance obligations under GMA's
web-hosting and training contracts were assigned to us. Accordingly, this
revenue is recognized in our financial statements when it is collected, along
with our revenue of CirTran Online Corporation.
We sold our Salt Lake City, Utah, building in a sale/leaseback transaction, and
reported the gain on the sale as deferred revenue to be recognized over the term
of lease pursuant to ASC 840-10, Accounting for Leases.
We have entered into a Manufacturing, Marketing and Distribution Agreement with
PlayBev, a related party, whereby we are the vendor of record in providing
initial development, promotional, marketing, and distribution services marketing
and distribution services. Accordingly, all amounts billed to PlayBev in
connection with the development and marketing of its new energy drink have been
included in revenue.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - We review our long-lived assets, including
intangibles, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. At each balance
sheet date, we evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that
indicate possible impairment. We use an estimate of future undiscounted net cash
flows from the related asset or group of assets over their remaining life in
measuring whether the assets are recoverable. As of December 31, 2009, it was
determined that the Company's investment in Diverse Talent Group was impaired,
and the Company recorded a loss on investment in the amount of
$452,000.Long-lived asset costs are amortized over the estimated useful life of
the asset, which is typically 5 to 7 years. Amortization expense was $444,456
and $444,455 for each of the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Financial Instruments with Derivative Features - We do not hold or issue
derivative instruments for trading purposes. However, we have financial
instruments that are considered derivatives, or contain embedded features
subject to derivative accounting. Embedded derivatives are valued separate from
the host instrument and are recognized as derivative liabilities in our balance
sheet. We measure these instruments at their estimated fair value, and recognize
changes in their estimated fair value in results of operations during the period
of change. We have estimated the fair value of these embedded derivatives using
the Black-Scholes model. The fair value of the derivative instruments are
measured each quarter.
Registration Payment Arrangements - On January 1, 2007, we adopted ASC 815-40
Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements. Under ASC 815-40, and ASC
450-10, Accounting for Contingencies, a registration payment arrangement is an
arrangement where (a) we have agreed to file a registration statement for
certain securities with the SEC and have the registration statement declared
effective within a certain time period; and/or (b) we will endeavor to keep a
registration statement effective for a specified period of time; and (c)
transfer of consideration is required if we fail to meet those requirements.
When we issues an instrument coupled with these registration payment
requirements, we estimate the amount of consideration likely to be paid under
the agreement, and offsets such amount against the proceeds of the instrument
issued. The estimate is then reevaluated at the end of each reporting period,
and any changes recognized as a registration penalty in the results of
operations. As further described in Note 9 to the consolidated financial
statements, we have instruments that contain registration payment arrangements.
The effect of implementing this has not had a material effect on the financial
statements because we consider probability of payment under the terms of the
agreements to be remote.
Stock-Based Compensation - Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions
of ASC 718-10, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, for our stock-based
compensation plans. We previously accounted for our plans under the recognition
and measurement principles of Accounting Standards No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees ("APB 25") and related interpretations and disclosure
requirements established by ASC 718-10, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,
as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition
and Disclosure.
34
Under APB 25, no compensation expense was recorded in earnings for our
stock-based options granted under our compensation plans, since the intrinsic
value of the options was zero. The pro forma effects on net income and earnings
per share for the options and awards granted under the plans were instead
disclosed in a note to the consolidated financial statements. Under ASC 718-10,
all stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date, based on the fair
value of the option or award, and is recognized as an expense in earnings over
the requisite service period, which is typically through the date the options
vest.
We adopted ASC 718-10 using the modified prospective method. Under this method,
compensation cost would've been recognized over the remaining service periods
for the unvested portion of all stock-based options and awards granted prior to
January 1, 2006, that remained outstanding, based on the grant-date fair value
measured under the original provisions of ASC 718-10 for pro forma and
disclosure purposes. However, no such options were outstanding as of January 1,
2006. There were 5.5 million options granted from the 2004 Stock Plan during
2006 that resulted in $65,616 in compensation cost which would have previously
been presented in a pro forma disclosure, as discussed above.
We utilized the Black-Scholes model for calculating the fair value pro forma
disclosures under ASC 718-10, and will continue to use this model, which is an
acceptable valuation approach under ASC 718-10.
ITEM 6A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not required.
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Our financial statements appear at the end of this report, beginning with the
Index to Financial Statements on page F-1.
ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the required time periods, and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer / Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for
timely decisions regarding disclosure.
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, we conducted an evaluation
under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer / Chief Financial Officer
of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December
31, 2010. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer / Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not
effective to provide reasonable assurance as of December 31, 2010, because of
certain deficiencies involving internal controls constituted material
weaknesses, as discussed below. The material weaknesses identified did not
result in the restatement of any previously reported financial statements or any
other related financial disclosure, and management does not believe that the
material weaknesses had any effect on the accuracy of our financial statements
for the current reporting period.
35
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, there were no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
A system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the system will meet its
objectives. The design of a control system is based, in part, upon the benefits
of the control system relative to its costs. Control systems can be circumvented
by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or
by management override of the control. In addition, over time, controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In addition, the design of any
control system is based in part upon assumptions about the likelihood of future
events.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control of over financial reporting as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We have assessed the
effectiveness of those internal controls as of December 31, 2010, using the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO")
Internal Control - Integrated Framework as a basis for our assessment.
Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may
not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies and procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems,
no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those
systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Further, the design
of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints,
and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.
A material weakness in internal controls is a deficiency in internal control, or
combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects the Company's
ability to initiate, authorize, record, processor report external financial data
reliably in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a
material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements
that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected.
Based on our evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, our
management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not
effective as of December 31, 2010.
As of December 31, 2010, management identified the following material
weaknesses:
o Control Environment - We did not maintain an effective control
environment for internal control over financial reporting.
Specifically, we concluded that we did not have appropriate controls
in the following areas:
o Segregation of Duties - As a result of limited resources and
staff, we did not maintain proper segregation of incompatible
duties. The effect of the lack of segregation of duties
potentially affects multiple processes and procedures.
o Entity Level Controls - We failed to maintain certain
entity-level controls as defined by the framework issued by
COSO. Specifically, our lack of staff does not allow us to
effectively maintain a sufficient number of adequately trained
personnel necessary to anticipate and identify risks critical
to financial reporting. There is a risk that a material
misstatement of the financial statements could be caused, or
at least not be detected in a timely manner, due to lack of
adequate staff with such expertise.
36
o Financial Reporting Process - We did not maintain an effective
financial reporting process to prepare financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Specifically, we initially failed to appropriately account for and
disclose the effects of the consolidation of PlayBev LLC as a
variable interest entity, allowances for bad debt, impairment of
long lived assets, calculation and recognition of energy drink
royalties, proper accounting for embedded derivative liabilities,
and proper recognition of year end accrued liabilities. However,
management believes that these issues have been addressed and
appropriately reflected within this annual report and the included
consolidated financial statements.
o Inventory - We failed to maintain effective internal controls over
the tracking of inventory and adjusting its' corresponding cost to
reflect lower of cost or market.
o Access to Cash - Our Company President has debit cards for most of
the Company's bank accounts and ability to transfer from his
personal bank account and the Company's bank accounts.
These weaknesses are continuing. Management and the Board of Directors are aware
of these weaknesses that result because of limited resources and staff.
Management has begun the process of formally documenting the key processes of
the Company as a starting point for improved internal control over financial
reporting. Efforts to fully implement the processes we have designed have been
put on hold due to limited resources, but we anticipate a renewed focus on this
effort in the near future. Due to our limited financial and managerial
resources, we cannot assure when we will be able to implement effective internal
controls over financial reporting.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's
registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's
registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's
report in this annual report.
ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION
The Company has previously reported all information required to be disclosed
under this Item 8B during the fourth quarter of 2009 in a report on Form 8-K.
PART III
ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS CONTROL PERSONS AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the executive
officers and directors of CirTran as of April 15, 2011:
Name Age Position
Iehab J. Hawatmeh 44 President, Chief Executive Officer,
Director,
Chairman of the Board, Chief Financial
Officer
Fadi Nora 50 Director
37
Iehab J. Hawatmeh founded our predecessor company in 1993 and has been our
Chairman, President and CEO since July 2000. Mr. Hawatmeh oversees all daily
operation including technical, operational and sales functions for the Company.
Mr. Hawatmeh is currently functioning in a dual role as Chief Financial Officer.
Prior to his involvement with the Company, Mr. Hawatmeh was the Processing
Engineering Manager for Tandy Corporation overseeing that company's contract
manufacturing printed circuit board assembly division. In addition, he was
responsible for developing and implementing Tandy's facility Quality Control and
Processing Plan model. Mr. Hawatmeh received a Master's of Business
Administration from University of Phoenix and a Bachelor's of Science in
Electrical and Computer Engineering from Brigham Young University. Since the
company was founded in 1993, we have employed a traditional board leadership
model, with our chief executive officer also serving as chairman of our board of
directors. We believe this traditional leadership structure benefits our
company. A combined chairman/CEO role helps provide strong, unified leadership
for our management team and board of directors. Our customers, suppliers and
other business partners have always viewed the chairman/CEO of Company as a
visionary leader in our industry, and we believe that having a single leader for
the company is good for our business. Accordingly, we believe a combined
chairman/CEO position is the best governance model for our company and our
shareholders.
Fadi Nora is a self-employed investment consultant. He was formerly a director
of ANAHOP, Inc., a private financing company, and was a consultant for several
projects and investment opportunities, including CirTran Corporation, NFE
records, Focus Media Group, and other projects. He has been a member of our
Board since February 2007. Prior to his affiliation with ANAHOP, Mr. Nora worked
with Prudential Insurance services and its affiliated securities brokerage firm
Pru-Bach, as District Sales Manager. Mr. Nora received a B.S. in Business
Administration from St. Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon, in 1982, and an MBA
- Masters of Management from the Azusa Pacific University School of Business in
1997. He also received a degree in financial planning from the University of
California at Los Angeles.
The Company believes Mr. Nora continues to be a strong contributor to the
management and growth of the Company, both domestically and internationally. Mr.
Nora has a strong finance background and his experience has helped us with
strong investor relationships. He has also be a leader in obtaining the
necessary financing required to grow our business in the beverage industry.
Shaher Hawatmeh, Chief Operating Officer, joined our predecessor company in 1993
as its Controller shortly after its founding. He has served in his present
capacity since June 2004. Mr. Hawatmeh directly oversees all daily manufacturing
production, customer service, budgeting and forecasting for the Company.
Following the Company's acquisition of Pro Cable Manufacturing in 1996, Mr.
Hawatmeh directly managed the entire Company, supervising all operations for
approximately two years and overseeing the integration of this new division into
the Company. Prior to joining CirTran, Mr. Hawatmeh worked for the Utah State
Tax Commission. Mr. Hawatmeh earned a Master's of Business Administration with
an emphasis in Finance from the University of Phoenix and a Bachelor's of
Science in Business Administration and a Minor in Accounting. Shaher Hawatmeh is
the brother of our President, CEO and Chairman, Iehab Hawatmeh. As noted above,
Mr. Shaher Hawatmeh resigned from the position of Chief Operating Officer of the
Company on March 5, 2010.
Board of Directors
The Board is elected by and is accountable to the shareholders of the Company.
The Board establishes policy and provides strategic direction, oversight, and
control of the Company. The Board met one time during 2009 and 4 times during
2010. All directors attended all of the meetings.
Committees of the Board of Directors
As of the date of this Report, the Company did not have separately-designated
Audit, Compensation, Governance or Nominating Committees. The Company's full
Board acts in these capacities. The Board has determined that the Company does
not have at present an audit committee financial expert as defined under
Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
As of the date of this Report, there have been no changes to the procedures by
which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.
38
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires CirTran's
officers, directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the
Company's common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership
with the SEC. Officers, directors, and greater-than-ten-percent shareholders are
also required by the SEC to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms
that they file.
Based solely upon a review of these forms that were furnished to the Company,
and based on representations made by certain persons who were subject to this
obligation that such filings were not required to be made, the Company believes
that all reports that were required to be filed by these individuals and persons
under Section 16(a) were filed on time in fiscal year 2010, except as follows:
One of the Company's directors, Mr. Nora, has not filed a Form 4 or Form 5 since
April 2008. He is in the process of preparing a Form 5 to make required
disclosures, and anticipates filing the Form 5 in the second quarter of 2011.
Code of Ethics
The Company expects that all of its directors, officers and employees will
maintain a high level of integrity in their dealings with and on behalf of the
Company and will act in the best interests of the Company. The Company has
adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics ("Code of Ethics") which provides
principles of conduct and ethics for the Company's directors, officers and
employees. This Code of Ethics complies with the requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Code of Ethics is available on the Company's
website at www.cirtran.com under "Investor Relations--Corporate Governance" and
is also available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy by writing to
our corporate secretary at 4125 South 6000 West, West Valley City, Utah 84128.
Director Independence
As of the date of this Report, the Company's common stock was traded on the OTC
Bulletin Board (the "Bulletin Board"). The Bulletin Board does not impose
standards relating to director independence, or provide definitions of
independence. The Company presently has no fully independent directors.
Shareholder Communications with Directors
If the Company receives correspondence from a shareholder that is addressed to
the Board, we forward it to every director or to the individual director to whom
it is addressed. Shareholders who wish to communicate with the directors may do
so by sending their correspondence to the director or directors at the Company's
headquarters at 4125 South 6000 West, West Valley City, Utah 84128.
ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
We are required to provide information regarding the compensation program in
place for our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the three
other most highly-compensated executive officers. We have also voluntarily
elected to include information concerning additional executive officers. In this
Annual Report, we refer to our CEO, CFO, and the other highly-compensated
executive officers named herein as our "Named Executive Officers." This section
includes information regarding, among other things, the overall objectives of
our compensation program and each element of compensation that we provide to
these and other executives of the Company. This section should be read in
conjunction with the detailed tables and narrative descriptions contained in
this Report.
As of the date of this Report, the Company did not have a compensation
committee; the Company's Board was responsible for determining the Company's
compensation policies.
Compensation Objectives
39
The Company's compensation program encompasses several factors to determine the
compensation of the Named Executive Officers. The following are the main
objectives of the compensation program for the Named Executive Officers:
o Retain qualified officers
o Provide overall corporate direction for the officers and also to
provide direction that is specific to the officers' respective areas
of authority. The level of compensation amongst the officer group,
in relation to one another, is also considered in order to maintain
a high level of satisfaction within the leadership group. We
consider the relationship that the officers maintain to be one of
the most important elements of the leadership group.
o Provide a performance incentive
o Reward the officers in the following areas:
o Achievement of specific goals, budgets, and objectives;
o Professional education and development;
o Creativity, innovative ideas, and analysis of new programs and
projects;
o New program implementation;
o Results-oriented determination and organization;
o Positive and supportive direction for company personnel; and
o Community involvement.
As of the date of this Report, there were four principal elements of Named
Executive Officer compensation. The Board determines the portion of compensation
allocated to each element for each individual Named Executive Officer. The
discussions of compensation practices and policies are of historical practices
and policies. Our Board is expected to continue these policies and practices,
but will reevaluate the practices and policies as it considers advisable.
The primary elements of the compensation program include:
o Base salary;
o Performance bonus and commissions;
o Stock options and stock awards
o Employee benefits in the form of:
o Health and dental insurance;
o Life insurance;
o Paid parking and auto reimbursement; and
o Other de minimis benefits.
Base salary
Base salary is intended to provide competitive compensation for job performance
and to attract and retain qualified individuals. The base salary level is
determined by considering several factors inherent in the market place such as:
the size of the company; the prevailing salary levels for the particular office
or position; prevailing salary levels in a given geographic locale; and the
qualifications and experience of the officer.
Performance bonus and commissions
Bonuses are in large part based on company performance. An earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ("EBITDA") formula and sales
growth are the determining factors used to calculate the performance bonus for
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer. These two officers are
also paid a commission based on a percentage that sales revenue increases as
compared to the prior year. In addition, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Operating Officer are eligible to receive a bonus equal to a certain percentage
of, respectively, the value of an acquisition, and the amount of investment
proceeds, that the Company achieves during the preceding year attributable
solely to their specific efforts. The Chief Financial Officer receives a
performance bonus based on performance, as determined by the Board, in addition
to any bonus required under an employment contract. Policy decisions to waive or
modify performance goals have not been a significant factor to date.
40
Stock options and stock awards
Stock ownership is provided to enable Named Executive Officers and directors to
participate in the success of the Company. The direct or potential ownership of
stock will also provide the incentive to expand the involvement of the Named
Executive Officer to include, and therefore be mindful of, the perspective of
stockholders of the Company.
Employee benefits
Several of the employee benefits for the Named Executive Officers are selected
to provide security for the Named Executive Officers. Most notably, insurance
coverage for health, life, and liability are intended to provide a level of
protection to that will enable the Named Executive Officers to function without
having the distraction of having to manage undue risk. The health insurance also
provides access to preventative medical care which will help the officers
function at a high energy level, manage job related stress, and contribute to
the overall well being, all of which contribute to an enhanced job performance.
Other de minimis benefits
Other de minimis employee benefits such as cell phones, parking, and auto usage
reimbursements are directly related to job functions but contain a personal use
element which is considered to be a goodwill gesture that contributes to
enhanced job performance.
As discussed above, the Board determines the portion of compensation allocated
to each element for each individual Named Executive Officer. As a general rule,
salary is competitively based, while giving consideration to employee retention,
qualifications, performance, and general market conditions. Typically, stock
options are based on the current market value of the option and how that will
contribute to the overall compensation of the Named Executive Officer.
Consideration is also given to the fact that the option has the potential for an
appreciated future value. As such, the future value may be the most significant
factor of the option, but it is also more difficult to quantify as a benefit to
the Named Executive Officer.
Accordingly, in determining the compensation program for the Company, as well as
setting the compensation for each Named Executive Officer, the Board attempts to
attract the interest of the Named Executive Officer within in the constraints of
a compensation package that is fair and equitable to all parties involved.
The following table summarizes all compensation paid to the Named Executive
Officers in each of the last two fiscal years.
41
Summary Compensation Table
Change in
Non- Pension Value
Equity and
Incentive Nonqualified All
Plan Deferred Other
Stock Option Compen- Compensation Compen-
Name and Principal Salary Bonus Awards Awards sation Earnings sation Total
Position Year $ $ $ $ $ $ $ (1) $
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iehab J. Hawatmeh,
President and Chief
Executive Officer 2009 314,231 - - 10,538 - - 23,789 348,558
(3) 2010 465,000 194,035 - 42,581 - - 28,773 730,389
Shaher Hawatmeh,
Chief Operating 2009 210,000 - - - - - 21,456 231,456
Officer(2) 2010 210,000 - - - - - 7,266 217,266
(1) Amounts for Mr. Iehab Hawatmeh and Shaher Hawatmeh include $12,250
and $9,000 for car allowance, respectively, and $13,539 each for
payments of medical insurance premiums.
(2) As noted above, Mr. Shaher Hawatmeh resigned from the Company on
March 5, 2010.
(3) Mr. Iehab Hawatmeh, has not received cash payments for salary during
the year. His salary expense has been accrued.
Employment Agreements
On August 1, 2009, we entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Hawatmeh,
our President, which amends and restates in their entirety (i) the Employment
Agreement between us and Mr. Hawatmeh dated July 1, 2004, and the Amendment to
Employment Agreement dated January 4, 2007. The term of the employment agreement
continues until August 31, 2014, and automatically extends for successive one
year periods, with an annual base salary of $345,000. The Employment Agreement
also grants to Mr. Hawatmeh options to purchase a minimum of 6,000,000 shares of
the Company's stock each year, with the exercise price of the options being the
market price of the Company's common stock as of the grant date. The Employment
Agreement also provides for health insurance coverage, cell phone, car
allowance, life insurance, and director and officer liability insurance, as well
as any other bonus approved by the Board. The Employment Agreement includes
additional incentive compensation as follows: a quarterly bonus equal to 5
percent of the Company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization for the applicable quarter; bonus(es) equal to 1.0 percent of the
net purchase price of any acquisitions completed by the Company that are
directly generated and arranged by Mr. Hawatmeh; and an annual bonus (payable
quarterly) equal to 1 percent of the gross sales, net of returns and allowances
of all beverage products of the Company and its affiliates for the most recent
fiscal year. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. Hawatmeh's employment may
be terminated for cause, or upon death or disability, in which event the Company
is required to pay Mr. Hawatmeh any unpaid base salary and unpaid earned
bonuses. In the event that Mr. Hawatmeh is terminated without cause, the Company
is required to pay to Mr. Hawatmeh (i) within thirty (30) days following such
termination, any benefit, incentive or equity plan, program or practice (the
"Accrued Obligations") paid when the bonus would have been paid Employee if
employed; (ii) within thirty (30) days following such termination (or on the
earliest later date as may be required by Internal Revenue Code Section 409A to
the extent applicable), a lump sum equal to thirty (30) month's annual base
salary, (iii) bonus(es) owing under the Employment Agreement for the two year
42
period after the date of termination (net of an bonus amounts paid as Accrued
Obligations) based on actual results for the applicable quarters and fiscal
years; and (iv) within twelve (12) months following such termination (or on the
earliest later date as may be required by Internal Revenue Code Section 409A to
the extent applicable), a lump sum equal to thirty (30) month's Annual Base
Salary; provided that if Employee is terminated without cause in contemplation
of, or within one (1) year, after a change in control, then two (2) times such
annual base salary and bonus payment amounts.
On July 1, 2004, we entered into an employment agreement with our President and
CEO, Iehab Hawatmeh, with an effective date of June 26, 2004 for a term of five
years, automatic renewal on a year-to-year basis, base salary of $225,000, bonus
of 5% of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization,
payable quarterly, as well as any other bonus approved by the Board, and health
insurance coverage, cell phone, car allowance, life insurance, and director and
officer liability insurance. Mr. Hawatmeh's employment could be terminated for
cause, or upon death or disability; a severance penalty applied in the event of
termination without cause, in an amount equal to five full years of the
then-current annual base compensation, half upon termination and half one year
later, together with a continuation of insurance benefits for a period of five
years. On January 1, 2007, an amendment to the employment agreement became
effective. The amended agreement is for a term of five years and renews
automatically on a year-to year basis, provides for base salary of $295,000,
plus a quarterly bonus of 5% of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,
and amortization, as well as an annual bonus payable as soon as practicable
after completion of the audit of the Company's annual financial statements equal
to 0.5% of gross sales for the most recent fiscal prior year which exceed 120%
of gross sales for the previous fiscal year, plus an additional bonus of 1% of
the net purchase price of any acquisitions that are generated by the executive,
and any other bonus approved by the Board. The amended agreement also provides
for a grant of options to purchase 5,000,000 shares of the Company's common
stock in accordance with the terms of the Company's Stock Option Plan, with
terms and an exercise price at the fair market value of the Company's common
stock on the date of grant. The amended agreement provides for benefits
including health insurance coverage, car allowance, and life insurance.
On March 5, 2010 we entered into a Separation Agreement ("Agreement") with Mr.
Shaher Hawatmeh. As of the date of the "Agreement" Mr. Hawatmeh's employment
with us terminated and he no longer has any further employment obligations with
us. In consideration of his execution of this "Agreement" we will pay Mr.
Hawatmeh's "Separation Pay" of $210,000 in twenty-six bi-weekly payments. The
first payment of the Separation Pay was to begin on March 19, 2010. We have made
the first payment to Mr. Hawatmeh. Additional terms of the separation agreement
include payment of all amounts necessary to cover health and medial premiums on
behalf of Mr. Hawatmeh, his spouse and dependents through April 20, 2010, all
outstanding car allowances and expense ($750) due and owing as of February 28,
2010, satisfaction and payment by us (with a complete release of Mr. Hawatmeh)
of all outstanding amounts due and owing on our Corporate American Express Card
(issued in the name of Shaher) and the issuance and delivery to Mr. Hawatmeh of
ten million (10,000,000) share of our common stock within a reasonable time
following authorization by our shareholders of sufficient shares to cover such
issuance.
On August 1, 2009, we entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Hawatmeh,
our President, which amends and restates in their entirety (i) the Employment
Agreement between us and Mr. Hawatmeh dated July 1, 2004, and the Amendment to
Employment Agreement dated January 4, 2007. The term of the employment agreement
continues until August 31, 2014, and automatically extends for successive one
year periods, with an annual base salary of $345,000. The Employment Agreement
also grants to Mr. Hawatmeh options to purchase a minimum of 6,000,000 shares of
the Company's stock each year, with the exercise price of the options being the
market price of the Company's common stock as of the grant date. The Employment
Agreement also provides for health insurance coverage, cell phone, car
allowance, life insurance, and director and officer liability insurance, as well
as any other bonus approved by the Board, . The Employment Agreement includes
additional incentive compensation as follows: a quarterly bonus equal to 5
percent of the Company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization for the applicable quarter; bonus(es) equal to 1.0 percent of the
net purchase price of any acquisitions completed by the Company that are
directly generated and arranged by Mr. Hawatmeh; and an annual bonus (payable
quarterly) equal to 1 percent of the gross sales, net of returns and allowances
of all beverage products of the Company and its affiliates for the most recent
fiscal year.
43
Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. Hawatmeh's employment may be
terminated for cause, or upon death or disability, in which event the Company is
required to pay Mr. Hawatmeh any unpaid base salary and unpaid earned bonuses.
In the event that Mr. Hawatmeh is terminated without cause, the Company is
required to pay to Mr. Hawatmeh (i) within thirty (30) days following such
termination, any benefit, incentive or equity plan, program or practice (the
"Accrued Obligations") paid when the bonus would have been paid Employee if
employed; (ii) within thirty (30) days following such termination (or on the
earliest later date as may be required by Internal Revenue Code Section 409A to
the extent applicable), a lump sum equal to thirty (30) month's annual base
salary, (iii) bonus(es) owing under the Employment Agreement for the two year
period after the date of termination (net of an bonus amounts paid as Accrued
Obligations) based on actual results for the applicable quarters and fiscal
years; and (iv) within twelve (12) months following such termination (or on the
earliest later date as may be required by Internal Revenue Code Section 409A to
the extent applicable), a lump sum equal to thirty (30) month's Annual Base
Salary; provided that if Employee is terminated without cause in contemplation
of, or within one (1) year, after a change in control, then two (2) times such
annual base salary and bonus payment amounts.
On May 1, 2009, PlayBev, a newly consolidated entity, entered into compensation
agreements with its managers, Mr. Hawatmeh and Mr. Nora. The agreed compensation
consists of a monthly fee of $10,000 for each manager, reimbursement of
reasonable expenses on behalf of the Company, a car allowance for Mr. Nora of
$1,000 per month to cover the cost of use, fuel and repairs. The Company has
accrued $420,000 in compensation, which is included in related party payables as
of December 31, 2010.
44
Equity Compensation Plans
Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans
The following table sets forth information about securities that may be issued
under the Company's equity compensation plans as of the date of this Annual
Report.
Number of securities Weighted-average Number of securities
to be issued upon exercise price of remaining available
exercise of outstanding for future issuance
outstanding options, options, warrants, under equity
Plan Category warrants and rights and rights compensation plans
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equity compensation plans
approved by shareholders 40,200,000 $ 0.014 37,840,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equity compensation plans
not approved by shareholders None None None
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 40,200,000 $ 0.014 37,840,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table summarizes information regarding options and other equity
awards exercised and the awards owned by the Named Executive Officers that have
vested as of December 31, 2010.
Option Awards Stock Awards
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Incentive
Market Equity Plan
Number Value Incentive Awards:
Equity of of Plan Market or
Number of Number of Incentive Shares Shares Awards: Payout
Securities Securities Plan or or Number of Value of
Under- Under- Awards: Units Units Unearned Unearned
lying lying Number of of of Shares, Shares,
Unexer- Unexer- Securities Stock Stock Units, or Units, or
cised cisable Underlying That That Other Other
Options Options Unexercised Option Have Have Rights That Rights That
(#) (#) Unearned Exercise Option Not Not Have Not Have Not
Exer- Unexer- Options Price Expiration Vested Vested Vested Vested
Name cisable cisable (#) ($) Date (#) ($) (#) ($)
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iehab J. Hawatmeh, 6,000,000 - - $0.013 01-18-12 - - - -
President and 6,000,000 - - $0.012 11-21-12 - - - -
Chief
Executive Officer
(1)
(1) December 31, 2009 and 2010, included in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 15, 2011. Amounts for Iehab J. Hawatmeh include amounts
related to two separate grants of options, one at the beginning and
one at the end of 2007. The former grant was intended to relate to
services to be rendered during 2007, and the latter was intended to
relate to services to be rendered during 2008.
45
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company to Directors for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
Change in
Pension Value
and
Fees Nonqualified
Earned Non-Equity Deferred
or Paid Stock Option Incentive Plan Compensation All Other
in Cash Awards Awards Compensation Earnings Compensation Total
Name ($) ($) ($) (2) ($) ($) ($) ($)
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iehab Hawatmeh (1) - - - - - - -
Fadi Nora (2) 20,000 - 53,703 - - 27,261 100,964
(1) Iehab Hawatmeh also served as an executive officer of the Company
during 2010. He received compensation for his services as an
executive officer, set forth above in the Summary Compensation
Table. He did not receive any additional compensation for his
services as director of the Company.
(2) The amounts in this column reflect the dollar amount recognized for
financial statement reporting purposes, excluding the effect of
estimated forfeitures, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010,
in accordance with accounting principles. Assumptions used in the
calculation of these amounts are included in Note 21 to the
Company's audited financial statements for the year ended December
31, 2010, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
46
ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the ownership of the
Company's common stock by each person who, to the knowledge of the Company, is
the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock,
or who is (i) each person who is currently a director, (ii) each Named Executive
Officer, (iii) all current directors and Named Executive Officers as a group as
of April 15, 2011.
Amount and
nature of
(1) Title (2) Name of beneficial
of class beneficial owner ownership Percent of class
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Stock Iehab J. Hawatmeh (1) 145,060,960 9.6%
Fadi Nora (2) 88,494,199 5.8%
All Officers and
Directors as a
Group
(2 persons) 232,780,320 15.3%
(1) Includes options to purchase up to 12,000,000 shares that can be
exercised anytime at exercise prices ranging between $0.012 and
$0.013 per share. Excludes shares underlying a Stock Purchase
Agreement to purchase 50,000,000 shares.
(2) Includes 2,599,500 shares beneficially owned by Mr. Nora's spouse.
Also includes options to purchase up to 4,800,000 shares that can be
exercised anytime at exercise prices ranging between $0.012 and
$0.013 per share. Includes 12,000,000 shares received from Mrs.
Sawabini, on behalf of her husband Mr. Fakhouri. Excludes shares
underlying a Stock Purchase Agreement to purchase 75,000,000 shares.
The persons named in the table have sole or shared voting and dispositive power
with respect to all shares beneficially owned, subject to community property
laws where applicable. Beneficial ownership is determined according to the rules
of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally means that person has
beneficial ownership of a security if he or she possesses sole or shared voting
or investment power over that security. Each director, officer, or 5% or more
shareholder, as the case may be, has furnished us information with respect to
beneficial ownership. Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that the
beneficial owners of the common stock listed above, based on the information
each of them has given to us, have sole or shared investment and voting power
with respect to their shares, except where community property laws may apply.
ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
Play Beverages, LLC
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company began to consolidate into its financial
statements the accounts of PlayBev Corporation, formerly an unconsolidated
related party. PlayBev Corporation holds the Playboy license and is
majority-owned by the Company and its related parties. In prior years, PlayBev
was not required to be consolidated due to lack of control over significant
decisions by the Company or its affiliates. However. in the fourth quarter of
2010, the Company reevaluated its relationship with PlayBev and concluded that
it was required to consider whether it had a variable interest in PlayBev.
Management concluded that PlayBev's level of equity was not sufficient to permit
PlayBev to operate on its own without additional subordinated support and that
the Company was the primary beneficiary for accounting purposes.
47
During 2006, Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. ("Playboy") entered into a
licensing agreement with Play Beverages, LLC ("PlayBev"), then an unrelated
Delaware limited liability company, whereby PlayBev agreed to internationally
market and distribute a new energy drink carrying the Playboy name and "Rabbit
Head" logo symbol. In May 2007, PlayBev entered into an exclusive agreement with
the Company to arrange for the manufacture, marketing and distribution of the
energy drinks, other Playboy-licensed beverages, and related merchandise through
various distribution channels throughout the world.
In an effort to finance the initial development and marketing of the new drink,
the Company with other investors formed After Bev Group LLC ("AfterBev"), a
California limited liability company and partially owned, consolidated
subsidiary of the Company. The Company contributed its expertise in exchange for
an initial 84 percent membership interest in AfterBev. The other initial
AfterBev members contributed $500,000 in exchange for the remaining 16 percent.
The Company borrowed an additional $250,000 from an individual, and contributed
the total $750,000 to PlayBev in exchange for a 51 percent interest in PlayBev's
cash distributions. The Company previously recorded this $750,000 amount as an
investment in PlayBev, accounted for under the cost method. PlayBev then
remitted these funds to Playboy as part of a guaranteed royalty prepayment.
Along with the membership interest granted the Company, PlayBev agreed to
appoint the Company's president and one of the Company's directors to two of
PlayBev's three executive management positions. Additionally, an unrelated
executive manager of PlayBev resigned, leaving the remaining two executive
management positions occupied by the Company president and one of the Company's
directors. On August 23, 2008, PlayBev's members agreed to amend its operating
agreement to change the required membership vote on major managerial and
organizational decisions from 75 percent to 95 percent. Since 2007, the two
affiliates personally purchased membership interests from PlayBev directly and
from other PlayBev members constituting an additional 23.1 percent, which
aggregated 34.35 percent. Despite the combined 90.5 percent interest owned by
these affiliates and the Company, the Company cannot unilaterally control
significant operating decisions of PlayBev, as the amended operating agreement
requires that various major operating and organizational decisions be agreed to
by at least 95 percent of all members. The other members of PlayBev are not
affiliated with the Company. In previous years, management concluded that while
PlayBev is a related party, the Company did not have the ability to unilaterally
control significant operating decisions of PlayBev, and therefore had not
accounted for PlayBev's operations as if it was a consolidated subsidiary.
However, on January 1, 2010, the Company adopted ASU 2009-17 (ASC Topic 810,
Consolidation), Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with
Variable Interest Entities. ASU 2009-17 amends the consolidation guidance
applicable to variable interest entities ("VIEs") and requires additional
disclosures concerning an enterprise's continuing involvement with VIEs. The
Company evaluated the impact of this guidance and determined that the adoption
resulted in the December 31, 2010, consolidation of PlayBev
PlayBev has no operations, so under the terms of the exclusive manufacturing and
distribution agreement, we were appointed as the master manufacturer and
distributor of the beverages and other products that PlayBev licensed from
Playboy. In so doing, we assumed all the risk of collecting amounts owed from
customers, and contracting with vendors for manufacturing and marketing
activities. In addition, PlayBev is owed a royalty from the Company equal to our
gross profits from collected beverage sales, less 20 percent of our related cost
of goods sold, and 6 percent our collected gross sales. We incurred $745,121 in
royalty expenses due to PlayBev during the year ended December 31, 2009. The
intercompany royalty and expense items have been eliminated in the consolidated
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010.
We also agreed to provide services to PlayBev for initial development,
marketing, and promotion of the new beverage. These services are to be billed to
PlayBev and recorded as an account receivable from PlayBev. We initially agreed
to carry up to a maximum of $1,000,000 as a receivable due from PlayBev in
connection with these billed services. On March 19, 2008 we agreed to increase
the maximum amount it would carry as a receivable due from PlayBev, in
connection with these billed services, from $1,000,000 to $3,000,000. As of
March 19, 2008 we also began charging interest on the outstanding amounts owing
at a rate of 7 percent per annum. PlayBev has agreed to repay the receivable and
accrued interest out of the royalties due PlayBev. PlayBev has agreed to repay
the receivable and accrued interest out of the royalties due PlayBev. We have
billed PlayBev for marketing and development services totaling $3,776,101 for
the year ended December 31, 2009, which has been included in revenues for our
marketing and media segment during 2009. As of December 31, 2009, the interest
accrued on the balance owing from PlayBev totaled $735,831. The net amount due
us from PlayBev for marketing and development services, after netting the
royalty owed to PlayBev, totaled $6,955,817 at December 31, 2009. All these
intercompany balances have been eliminated in the consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2010.
48
AfterBev Group, LLC
Following AfterBev's organization in May 2007, we entered into consulting
agreements with two individuals, one of whom had loaned us $250,000 when we
invested in PlayBev, and the other one was one of our directors. The agreements
provided that we assign to each individual approximately one-third of our share
in future AfterBev cash distributions, in exchange for their assistance in the
initial AfterBev organization and planning, along with their continued
assistance in subsequent beverage development and distribution activities. The
agreements also provided that as we sold a portion of its membership interest in
AfterBev, the individuals would each be owed their proportional assigned share
distributions in the proceeds of such a sale. The actual payment of the
distributions depended on what we did with the sale proceeds. If we used the
proceeds to help finance beverage development and marketing activities, the
payment of distributions would be deferred, pending collections from customers
once beverage product sales eventually commenced. Otherwise, the proportional
assigned share distributions would be due to the two individuals.
Throughout the balance of 2007, as energy drink development and marketing
activities progressed, we raised additional funds by selling portions of its
membership interest in AfterBev to other investors, some of whom were our
stockholders. In some cases, we sold a portion of its membership interest,
including voting rights. In other cases, we sold merely a portion of its share
of future AfterBev profits and losses. By the end of 2007, after taking into
account the two interests it had assigned, we had retained a net 14 percent
interest in AfterBev's profits and losses, but had retained 52 percent of all
voting rights in AfterBev. We recorded the receipt of these net funds as
increases to its existing minority interest in AfterBev, and the rest as amounts
owing as distributable proceeds payable to the two individuals with assigned
interests of our original share of AfterBev.
At the end of 2007, we agreed to convert the amount owing to one of the
individuals into a promissory note. In exchange, the individual agreed to
relinquish his approximately one-third portion of our remaining share of
AfterBev's profits and losses. Instead, the individual received a membership
interest in AfterBev. In January 2008, the other assignee, which is one our
directors, similarly agreed to relinquish the distributable proceeds owed to
him, in exchange for an interest in AfterBev's profits and losses. Accordingly,
he purchased a 24 percent interest in AfterBev's profits and losses in exchange
for foregoing $863,973 in amounts due to him. Of this 24 percent, by the end of
December 31, 2008, the director had sold or transferred 23 percent to unrelated
investors and retained the remaining 1 percent interest in AfterBev's profits
and losses. In turn, the director loaned $834,393 to us in the form of unsecured
advances. Of the amounts loaned, $600,000 was used to purchase interest in
PlayBev directly which resulted in a reduction of $600,000 of amounts owed by
PlayBev to us. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the director advanced an
additional $500,000 to us for his purchase of an additional 3 percent interest
in PlayBev, which resulted in a reduction of $500,000 of amounts owed by PlayBev
to us. As of December 31, 2010 we still owed the director $686,999 in the form
of unsecured advance. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2009 one
of our directors and our president purchased 6 percent and 5 percent of AfterBev
shares, respectively, in private sales from existing shareholders of Afterbev.
Global Marketing Alliance
We entered into an agreement with GMA, and hired GMA's owner as the Vice
President of CirTran Online (CTO), one of our subsidiaries. Under the terms of
the agreement, we outsource to GMA the online marketing and sales activities
associated with our CTO products. In return, we provide bookkeeping and
management consulting services to GMA, and pay GMA a fee equal to five percent
of CTO's online net sales. In addition, GMA assigned to us all of its
web-hosting and training contracts effective as of January 1, 2007, along with
the revenue earned thereon, and we also assumed the related contractual
performance obligations. We recognize the revenue collected under the GMA
contracts, and remit back to GMA a management fee approximating their actual
costs. We recognized net revenues from GMA related products and services in the
amount of $1,095,086 and $2,572,955 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
Transactions involving ANAHOP, Inc.
49
In May 2006, we closed a private placement of shares of the Company's common
stock and warrants (the "May Private Offering"). Pursuant to a securities
purchase agreement we issued 14,285,715 shares of common stock (the "May
Shares") to ANAHOP, Inc. ("ANAHOP"), a California company partially owned by
Fadi Nora. The consideration paid for the May Shares was $1,000,000. In addition
to the Shares, the Company issued warrants (the "Warrants") to designees of
ANAHOP to purchase up to an additional 36,000,000 shares of common stock. Of
this amount, Mr. Nora was designated to receive Warrants to purchase 10,000,000
shares of common stock.
In June 2006, the Company closed a second private placement of shares of its
common stock and warrants (the "June Private Offering"). Pursuant to a
securities purchase agreement (the "Agreement"), the Company agreed to issue up
to 28,571,428 shares of common stock (the "June Shares") to ANAHOP. The total
consideration to be paid for the June Shares will be $2,000,000 if all tranches
of the sale close.
Pursuant to the Agreement, ANAHOP agreed to pay $500,000 (the "First Tranche
Payment"). Upon the receipt of the First Tranche Payment, the Company agreed to
issue a certificate or certificates to the Purchaser representing 7,142,857 of
the June Shares.
The remaining $1,500,000 is to be paid by ANAHOP as follows:
(i) No later than thirty calendar days following the date on which any
class of the Company's capital stock is first listed for trading on
either the Nasdaq Small Cap Market, the Nasdaq Capital Market, the
American Stock Exchange, or the New York Stock Exchange, ANAHOP
agreed to pay an additional $500,000 to the Company; and
(ii) No later than sixty calendar days following the date on which any
class of the Company's capital stock is first listed for trading on
either the Nasdaq Small Cap Market, the Nasdaq Capital Market, the
American Stock Exchange, or the New York Stock Exchange, ANAHOP
agreed to pay an additional $1,000,000 to the Company. (The payments
of $500,000 and $1,000,000 are referred to collectively as the
"Second Tranche Payment.")
Upon receipt by the Company of the Second Tranche Payment, the Company agreed to
issue a certificate or certificates to ANAHOP representing the remaining
21,428,571 June Shares.
Additionally, once the Company has received the Second Tranche Payment, the
Company agreed to issue warrants to designees of ANAHOP to purchase up to an
additional 63,000,000 shares.
On April 11, 2008, Mr. Nora disassociated himself from the other principals of
ANAHOP, and as part of the asset settlement, relinquished ownership of
12,857,144 shares of CirTran Corporation common stock and all of the warrants
previously assigned to him.
ITEM 13. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Audit Fees for Fiscal 2010 and 2009
The aggregate fees billed to the Company by Hansen Barnett & Maxwell, P.C., the
Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Auditor, for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, are as follows:
2010 2009
----------- ------------
Audit Fees (1) $ 122,082 $ 134,926
Audit-Related Fees - -
Tax Fees (2) $ 8,250 $ 8,425
All Other Fees - -
50
(1) Audit Fees consist of the audit of our annual financial
statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for its 2008 and 2009 fiscal years and Annual Report to
Shareholders, review of interim financial statements and
services that are normally provided by the independent
auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings
or engagements for those fiscal years.
(2) Tax Fees consist of fees for tax consultation and tax
compliance services.
The Board of Directors, acting in the absence of a designated Audit Committee,
has considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with
maintaining the independence of Hansen Barnett & Maxwell, P.C., and has
concluded that the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining the
independence of the Company's auditors.
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Copies of the following documents are included as exhibits to this report
pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
Exhibit No. Document
3.1 Articles of Incorporation (previously filed as Exhibit No. 2
to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission
on July 17, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2 Bylaws (previously filed as Exhibit No. 3 to our Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on July 17,
2000, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1 Securities Purchase Agreement between CirTran Corporation and
Highgate House Funds, Ltd., dated as of May 26, 2005
(previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on June 3, 2005,
and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2 Form of 5 percent Convertible Debenture, due December 31,
2007, issued by CirTran Corporation (previously filed as an
exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
with the Commission on June 3, 2005, and incorporated herein
by reference).
10.3 Investor Registration Rights Agreement between CirTran
Corporation and Highgate House Funds, Ltd., dated as of May
26, 2005 (previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on June
3, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4 Security Agreement between CirTran Corporation and Highgate
House Funds, Ltd., dated as of May 26, 2005 (previously filed
as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K,
filed with the Commission on June 3, 2005, and incorporated
herein by reference).
10.5 Escrow Agreement between CirTran Corporation, Highgate House
Funds, Ltd., and David Gonzalez dated as of May 26, 2005
(previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on June 3, 2005,
and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6 Amendment No. 1 to Investor Registration Rights Agreement,
between CirTran Corporation and Highgate House Funds, Ltd.,
dated as of June 15, 2006.
10.7 Amendment No. 1 to Investor Registration Rights Agreement,
between CirTran Corporation and Cornell Capital Partners, LP,
dated as of June 15, 2006.
10.8 Securities Purchase Agreement between CirTran Corporation and
ANAHOP, Inc., dated as of May 24, 2006 (previously filed as an
exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the Commission on May 30, 2006, and incorporated here in by
reference).
51
10.9 Warrant for 10,000,000 shares of CirTran Common Stock,
exercisable at $0.15, issued to Albert Hagar (previously filed
as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Commission on May 30, 2006, and incorporated
here in by reference).
10.10 Warrant for 5,000,000 shares of CirTran Common Stock,
exercisable at $0.15, issued to Fadi Nora (previously filed as
an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on May 30, 2006, and incorporated here in
by reference).
10.11 Warrant for 5,000,000 shares of CirTran Common Stock,
exercisable at $0.25, issued to Fadi Nora (previously filed as
an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on May 30, 2006, and incorporated here in
by reference).
10.12 Warrant for 10,000,000 shares of CirTran Common Stock,
exercisable at $0.50, issued to Albert Hagar (previously filed
as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Commission on May 30, 2006, and incorporated
here in by reference).
10.13 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2006, by and
between Advanced Beauty Solutions, LLC, and CirTran
Corporation (previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June
13, 2006, and incorporated here in by reference).
10.14 Securities Purchase Agreement between CirTran Corporation and
ANAHOP, Inc., dated as of June 30, 2006 (previously filed as
an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on July 6, 2006, and incorporated here in
by reference).
10.15 Warrant for 20,000,000 shares of CirTran Common Stock,
exercisable at $0.15, issued to Albert Hagar (previously filed
as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Commission on July 6, 2006, and incorporated
here in by reference).
10.16 Warrant for 10,000,000 shares of CirTran Common Stock,
exercisable at $0.15, issued to Fadi Nora (previously filed as
an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on July 6, 2006, and incorporated here in
by reference).
10.17 Warrant for 10,000,000 shares of CirTran Common Stock,
exercisable at $0.25, issued to Fadi Nora (previously filed as
an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on July 6, 2006, and incorporated here in
by reference).
10.18 Warrant for 23,000,000 shares of CirTran Common Stock,
exercisable at $0.50, issued to Albert Hagar (previously filed
as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Commission on July 6, 2006, and incorporated
here in by reference).
10.19 Lockdown Agreement by and between CirTran Corporation and
Cornell Capital Partners, LP, dated as of July 20, 2006
(previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2/A (File No. 333-128549) filed with the
Commission on July 27, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference).
10.20 Lockdown Agreement by and among CirTran Corporation and
ANAHOP, Inc., Albert Hagar, and Fadi Nora, dated as of July
20, 2006 (previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2/A (File No. 333-128549)
filed with the Commission on July 27, 2006, and incorporated
herein by reference).
10.21 Amendment No. 2 to Investor Registration Rights Agreement,
between CirTran Corporation and Highgate House Funds, Ltd.,
dated as of August 10, 2006 (filed as an exhibit to
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-128549) and
incorporated herein by reference).
10.22 Amendment No. 2 to Investor Registration Rights Agreement,
between CirTran Corporation and Cornell Capital Partners, LP,
dated as of August 10, 2006 (filed as an exhibit to
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-128549) and
incorporated herein by reference).
52
10.23 Amended Lock Down Agreement by and among the Company and
ANAHOP, Inc., Albert Hagar, and Fadi Nora, dated as of
November 15, 2006 (filed as an exhibit to the Company's
Quarterly Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2006,
filed with the Commission on November 20, 2006, and
incorporated herein by reference).
10.24 Amended Lock Down Agreement by and between the Company and
Cornell Capital Partners, L.P., dated as of October 30, 2006
(filed as an exhibit to the Company's Quarterly Report for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006, filed with the Commission on
November 20, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.25 Amendment to Debenture and Registration Rights Agreement
between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners, L.P., dated
as of October 30, 2006 (filed as an exhibit to the Company's
Quarterly Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2006,
filed with the Commission on November 20, 2006, and
incorporated herein by reference).
10.26 Amendment Number 2 to Amended and Restated Investor
Registration Rights Agreement, between CirTran Corporation and
Cornell Capital Partners, LP, dated January 12, 2007
(previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 19,
2007, and incorporated here in by reference).
10.27 Amendment Number 4 to Investor Registration Rights Agreement,
between CirTran Corporation and Cornell Capital Partners, LP,
dated January 12, 2007(previously filed as an exhibit to the
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission
on January 19, 2007, and incorporated here in by reference).
10.28 Amendment to Employment Agreement for Iehab Hawatmeh, dated
January 1, 2007 (previously filed as an exhibit to the
Company's Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006,
filed with the Commission on April 17, 2007, and incorporated
herein by reference)
10.29 Assignment and Exclusive Services Agreement with Global
Marketing Alliance, LLC, dated April 16, 2007 (previously
filed as an exhibit to the Company's' Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the Commission on April 20, 2007, and
incorporated herein by reference).
10.30 Triple Net Lease between CirTran Corporation and Don L.
Buehner, dated as of May 4, 2007 (previously filed as an
exhibit to the Company's' Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on May 10, 2007, and incorporated herein
by reference).
10.31 Commercial Real Estate Purchase Contract between Don L.
Buehner and PFE Properties, L.L.C., dated as of May 4, 2007
(previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's' Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 10, 2007,
and incorporated herein by reference).
10.32 Exclusive Manufacturing, Marketing, and Distribution
Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2007 (previously filed as an
exhibit to the Company's' Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on June 1, 2007, and incorporated herein
by reference).
10.33 Amendment Number 3 to Amended and Restated Investor
Registration Rights Agreement, between CirTran Corporation and
YA Global Investments, L.P. (previously filed as an exhibit to
the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the
Commission on February 12, 2008, and incorporated herein by
reference).
10.34 Amendment Number 6 to Investor Registration Rights Agreement,
between CirTran Corporation and YA Global Investments, L.P.
(previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on February 12,
2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
53
10.35 Agreement between and among CirTran Corporation, YA Global
Investments, L.P., and Highgate House Funds, LTD (previously
filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form
8-K, filed with the Commission on February 12, 2008, and
incorporated herein by reference).
10.36 Promissory Note (previously filed as an exhibit to the Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on March 5,
2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.37 Form of Warrant (previously filed as an exhibit to the Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on March 5,
2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.38 Subscription Agreement between the Company and Haya
Enterprises, LLC (previously filed as an exhibit to the
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on March
5, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.39 Amended and Restated Forbearance Agreement (previously filed
as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with
the Commission on January 28, 2011, and incorporated herein by
reference).
21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
31.1 Certification of President / Chief Financial Officer
32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 - President /
Chief Financial Officer
54
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
CIRTRAN CORPORATION
Date: April 15, 2011 By: /s/ Iehab J. Hawatmeh
-----------------------------------------
President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal
Financial Officer)
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
Date: April 15, 2011 /s/ Iehab Hawatmeh
-----------------------------------------
President, Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Executive Officer, Principal
Financial and Director
Date: April 15, 2011 /s/ Fadi Nora
-----------------------------------------
Director
55
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following financial statements of CirTran Corporation and related notes
thereto and auditors' report thereon is filed as part of this Form 10-K:
Page
----
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 F-4
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit for the
Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-8
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and the Shareholders
CirTran Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CirTran
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for
each of the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statements presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CirTran Corporation
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years then ended in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the
consolidated financial statements, the Company has an accumulated deficit, has
suffered losses from operations and has negative working capital that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's
plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 3. The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ HANSEN, BARNETT & MAXWELL, P.C.
Salt Lake City, Utah
April 15, 2011
F-2
CIRTRAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, December 31,
2010 2009
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 4,767 $ 8,588
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance
for doubtful accounts of $455,253 and
$290,806, respectively 629,830 472,947
Receivable due from related party - 670,266
Inventory, net of reserve of $2,065,558
and $2,045,052, respectively 542,356 873,650
Prepaid royalty 500,000 -
Prepaid deposits 109,874 82,011
Other 379,929 720,712
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current assets 2,166,756 2,828,174
Investment in securities, at cost 300,000 300,000
Investment in related party - 750,000
Long-term receivable due from related party - 6,285,551
Long-term receivable, net of allowance of
$367,024 and $0, respectively 1,215,871 1,647,895
Property and equipment, net 335,547 544,705
Intellectual property, net 169,459 1,270,358
Other assets, net 8,267 14,538
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total assets $ 4,195,900 $ 13,641,221
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities
Checks written in excess of bank balance $ 203,460 $ 217,361
Accounts payable 3,331,092 3,047,592
Related party payable 420,000 -
Short term advances payable 3,827,538 2,962,339
Accrued liabilities 4,761,611 2,941,876
Accrued interest 1,930,355 947,536
Deferred revenue 1,882,191 2,275,967
Derivative liability 1,412,646 523,349
Convertible debenture 3,161,355 3,161,355
Current portion of refundable customer deposits 1,117,387 828,933
Current maturities of notes payable 850,620 578,226
Note payable to stockholders 409,442 208,014
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current liabilities 23,307,697 17,692,548
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Refundable customer deposits, net of current
portion - 1,719,000
Notes payable, less current maturities - 196,614
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total liabilities 23,307,697 19,608,162
Stockholders' deficit
CirTran Corporation stockholders' deficit:
Common stock, par value $0.001; authorized
1,500,000,000 shares; issued and
outstanding shares: 1,498,972,923 and
1,498,972,923, respectively 1,498,968 1,498,968
Additional paid-in capital 29,128,672 29,117,928
Subscription receivable (17,000) (17,000)
Accumulated deficit (41,969,908) (39,140,068)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total CirTran Corporation stockholders'
deficit (11,359,268) (8,540,172)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noncontrolling interest (7,752,529) 2,573,231
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total stockholders' deficit (19,111,797) (5,966,941)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit $ 4,195,900 $ 13,641,221
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F-3
CIRTRAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2010 2009
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net sales $ 9,044,902 $ 9,732,855
Cost of sales (3,646,343) (8,819,995)
Royalty Expense (2,257,582) (745,121)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross profit 3,140,977 167,739
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses 5,738,682 4,412,219
Non-cash compensation expense 374,783 98,281
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating expenses 6,113,465 4,510,500
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loss from operations (2,972,488) (4,342,761)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other income (expense)
Interest expense (1,177,761) (1,221,004)
Interest income - 518,600
Settlement of litigation - (490,000)
Gain on settlement of litigation - 58,704
Gain on sale/leaseback 81,074 81,074
Loss on settlement of debt (81,666) 88,779
Impairment of intellectual properties - (156,340)
Impairment of investments in securities - (452,000)
Other income 85,500 -
Gain (loss) on derivative valuation (889,297) 100,295
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total other expense, net (1,982,150) (1,471,892)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss $ (4,954,638) $ (5,814,653)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling
interest 2,336,985 -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss attributable to CirTran $ (2,617,653) $ (5,814,653)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic and diluted loss per common share $ (0.00) $ (0.00)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic and diluted weighted-average
common shares outstanding 1,498,972,923 1,490,580,788
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4
CIRTRAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2010
Common Stock Additional Non-
Number paid-in Subscription Accumulated Controlling
of shares Amount capital receivable deficit Interest Total
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances at December 31, 2008 1,426,262,586 $ 1,426,257 $ 28,970,335 $ (17,000) $ (33,325,415) $ 2,573,231 $ (372,592)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares issued for partial
conversion of debentures,
including effect of
derivative conversion 72,710,337 72,711 126,744 - - - 199,455
Options granted to employees,
consultants and attorneys - - 5,530 - - - 5,530
Warrants granted to consultants
and attorneys - - 15,319 - - - 15,319
Net loss - - - - (5,814,653) - (5,814,653)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances at December 31, 2009 1,498,972,923 1,498,968 29,117,928 (17,000) (39,140,068) 2,573,231 (5,966,941)
Cumulative Effect Adjustment - - - (212,187) (7,988,775) (8,200,962)
Options granted to employees,
consultants and attorneys - - 3,986 - - - 3,986
Warrants granted to consultants
and attorneys - - 6,758 - - - 6,758
Net loss - - - - (2,617,653) (2,336,985) (4,954,638)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances at December 31, 2010 1,498,972,923 $ 1,498,968 $ 29,128,672 $ (17,000) $ (41,969,908) $ (7,752,529) (19,111,797)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
CIRTRAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2010 2009
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss $ (4,954,638) $ (5,814,653)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 653,615 660,940
Accretion expense 233,560 443,816
Provision for doubtful accounts 204,653 182,644
Provision for obsolete inventory 20,100 1,016,502
Loss on assignment of intangibles 205,462 -
Gain on sale - leaseback (81,074) (81,074)
Impairment of intangibles - 156,340
Impairment of long term receivable 367,024 -
Impairment of investment in securities - 452,000
Non-cash compensation expense 374,783 98,281
Loan costs and interest withheld from loan
proceeds - 15,662
Litigation settled through note payable - 100,000
Litigation settled through accrued liability - 390,000
Options issued to attorneys for services 6,758 20,849
Change in valuation of derivative 889,297 (100,295)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable (361,536) (164,630)
Related party receivable - (3,236,974)
Inventories 311,194 (438,877)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (43,326) (328,643)
Accounts payable 283,501 844,821
Related party payable 420,000 -
Accrued liabilities 2,606,709 2,749,117
Deferred revenue (393,776) 1,688,915
Customer deposits (1,430,546) 859,853
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash used in operating activities (688,240) (485,406)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from investing activities - -
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from notes payable to related party - 4,611
Payments on notes payable to related party (48,571) (22,434)
Principal payments on long-term debt (54,169) (106,854)
Checks written in excess of bank balance (13,901) 83,970
Proceeds from short-term advances 1,895,410 1,885,300
Payments on short-term advances (1,094,350) (1,359,300)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 684,419 485,293
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (3,821) (113)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 8,588 8,701
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 4,767 $ 8,588
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
CIRTRAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2010 2009
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest $ 74,686 $ 651,203
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Net assets assumed in consolidation of PlayBev 8,650,962
Debt settled in exchange for intangible assets 2,600,747
Related party liability settled through
reduction of related party receivable - 1,000,000
Accounts receivable settled through offset in
short-term liability - 100,480
Accrued liabilities settled on behalf of the
Company for issuance of short-term advance - 1,949,490
Debt settled on behalf of Company for issuance
of short term advances 114,139 1,315,000
Stock issued in payment of notes payable and
accrued interest - 199,455
Return of property and equipment - 12,400
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7
CIRTRAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
General - CirTran Corporation was founded in 1993 as an electronics contract
manufacturer of printed circuit board assemblies. CirTran has since evolved and
established itself as a leading international contract manufacturer. The Company
provides services in the electronic manufacturing, consumer products, marketing
and media, and beverage distribution. The Company's current focus is on the
worldwide marketing and distribution of energy drinks, sport drinks and vitamin
waters.
Basis of Presentation - CirTran Corporation, together with its subsidiaries
collectively, the "Company" or "CirTran" consolidates all of its majority-owned
subsidiaries and companies over which the Company exercises control through
majority voting rights. The Company accounts for its investments in common stock
of other companies that the Company does not control using the cost method.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of CirTran Corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries Racore
Technology Corporation, CirTran - Asia, Inc., CirTran Products Corp., CirTran
Media Corp., CirTran Online Corp., and CirTran Beverage Corp.
The consolidated financial statements also include the accounts of After Bev
Group LLC ("AfterBev"), a majority controlled entity, and Play Beverages LLC
("PlayBev"), a newly consolidated variable interest entity. PlayBev holds a
licence agreement with Playboy International, Inc. ("Playboy") to manufacture
and distribute energy drinks and water under the Playboy name. In prior years,
PlayBev was not required to be consolidated due to lack of control over
significant decisions by the Company or its affiliates. Effective January 1,
2010, the Company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of PlayBev and
began to consolidate into its financial statements the accounts of PlayBev.
Use of Estimates - In preparing the Company's financial statements in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition - Revenue is recognized when products are shipped. Title
passes to the customer or independent sales representative at the time of
shipment. Returns for defective items are either repaired and sent back to the
customer, or returned for credit or replacement product. Historically, expenses
associated with returns have not been significant and have been recognized as
incurred.
Royalty income is included as part of sales. The company recognizes royalty
revenue as it is earned. The customer distribution agreements generally specify
minimum royalty fees due to the Company during the contract period. The Company
recognizes royalty income on a straight-line basis over the term of the
distribution agreement when based on management's analysis of sales history, the
customer is not expected to meet the minimum required sales projections for the
contract period.
Revenue on refundable customer deposits is applied to customer sales in
agreement with the distribution agreement, unless the customer is in default
with the terms of the distribution agreement and the deposit is forfeited. The
Company recognizes revenue on refundable deposits in the event the customer
defaults on the terms of the distribution contract.
Shipping and handling fees are included as part of net sales. The related
freight costs and supplies directly associated with shipping products to
customers are included as a component of cost of goods sold.
F-8
The Company signed an Assignment and Exclusive Services Agreement with Global
Marketing Alliance, LLC ("GMA"), a related party, whereby revenues and all
associated performance obligations under GMA's web hosting and training
contracts were assigned to the Company. Accordingly, this revenue is recognized
in the Company's financial statements when it is collected, along with the
revenue of CirTran Online Corporation (see also Note 11).
The Company sold its building in a sale/leaseback transaction, and reported the
gain on the sale as deferred revenue to be recognized over the term of lease
pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC 840-10"), Accounting for
Leases (see also Note 7).
The Company through, its newly consolidated subsidiary PlayBev, has a product
licence agreement with Playboy to manufacture, market and distribute energy
drinks and water. The yearly costs of the license agreement have been recorded
as a prepaid asset and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the
estimated life of the term. Prior to consolidation, the Company entered into a
Manufacturing, Marketing and Distribution Agreement with PlayBev whereby the
Company is the vendor of record in providing initial development, promotional,
marketing, and distribution services marketing and distribution services. All
amounts billed to PlayBev in connection with the development and marketing of
its new energy drink have been included in revenue in 2009. For 2010, all
intercompany balances have been eliminated in consolidation (see also Note 11).
Cash and Cash Equivalents - The Company considers all highly liquid, short-term
investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Deposits are made to the Company in connection with distribution
agreements. The deposits are either refundable or applied to invoices based on
either annual minimum sales requirements and or actual sales shipments, as
detailed in the individual distribution agreement.
Accounts Receivable - Accounts receivable are carried at the original invoice
amount, less an estimate made for doubtful accounts based on a review of
outstanding amounts. Specific reserves are estimated by management based on
certain assumptions and variables, including the customer's financial condition,
age of the customer's receivable, and changes in payment histories. Accounts
receivable are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of accounts
receivable previously written off are recorded when received.
Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of average cost or market
value. Cost on manufactured inventories includes labor, material and overhead.
Overhead cost is based on indirect costs allocated to cost of sales,
work-in-process inventory, and finished goods inventory. Indirect overhead costs
have been charged to cost of sales or capitalized as inventory, based on
management's estimate of the benefit of indirect manufacturing costs to the
manufacturing process.
When there is evidence that the inventory's value is less than original cost,
the inventory is reduced to market value. The Company determines market value on
current resale amounts and whether technological obsolescence exists. The
Company has agreements with most of its manufacturing customers that require the
customer to purchase inventory items related to their contracts in the event
that the contracts are cancelled.
Preproduction Design and Development Costs - The Company incurs certain costs
associated with the design and development of molds and dies for its
contract-manufacturing segment. These costs are held as deposits on the balance
sheet until the molds or dies are finished and ready for use. At that point, the
costs are included as part of production equipment in property and equipment and
are amortized over their useful lives. The Company holds title to all molds and
dies used in the manufacture of its various products. The Company held $2,010
and $2,010 in deposits at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
capitalized cost, net of accumulated depreciation, associated with molds and
dies included in property and equipment at December 31, 2010 and 2009, was
$234,279 and $397,594, respectively.
Investment in Securities - The cost of the Company's cost-method investment
consist of an investment in a private digital multi-media technology company
which totaled $300,000 at December 31, 2010. The Company did not identify any
events or changes in circumstances that may have had a significant adverse
effect on the value of this investment. Based on the evaluation no impairment
was necessary as of December 31, 2010.
F-9
Property and Equipment - Depreciation expense is recognized in amounts equal to
the cost of depreciable assets over estimated service lives. Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the shorter of the life of the lease or the
service life of the improvements. The straight-line method of depreciation and
amortization is followed for financial reporting purposes. Maintenance, repairs,
and renewals, which neither materially add to the value of the property nor
appreciably prolong its life, are charged to expense as incurred. Gains or
losses on dispositions of property and equipment are included in operating
results.
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $209,159
and $216,485, respectively.
Patents - Legal fees and other direct costs incurred in obtaining patents in the
United States and other countries are capitalized. Patent costs are amortized
over the estimated useful life of the patent.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets -The Company reviews its long-lived assets,
including intangibles, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. At each
balance sheet date, the Company evaluates whether events and circumstances have
occurred that indicate possible impairment. The Company uses an estimate of
future undiscounted net cash flows from the related asset or group of assets
over their remaining life in measuring whether the assets are recoverable.
Long-lived asset costs are amortized over the estimated useful life of the
asset, which is typically five to seven years. Amortization expense was $444,456
and $444,455 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Financial Instruments with Derivative Features - The Company does not hold or
issue derivative instruments for trading purposes. However, the Company has
financial instruments that are considered derivatives, or contain embedded
features subject to derivative accounting. Embedded derivatives are valued
separate from the host instrument and are recognized as derivative liabilities
in the Company's balance sheet. The Company measures these instruments at their
estimated fair value, and recognizes changes in their estimated fair value in
results of operations during the period of change. The Company has estimated the
fair value of these embedded derivatives using the Black-Scholes model. The fair
values of the derivative instruments are measured each quarter. The Company
recorded an $889,297 loss on derivative valuation for the year ended December
31, 2010, as compared to a gain of $100,295 recorded for the year ended December
31, 2009.
Registration Payment Arrangements - A registration payment arrangement is an
arrangement where (a) the Company has agreed to file a registration statement
for certain securities with the SEC and have the registration statement declared
effective within a certain time period; and/or (b) the Company will endeavor to
keep a registration statement effective for a specified period of time; and (c)
transfer of consideration is required if the Company fails to meet those
requirements. When the Company issues an instrument coupled with these
registration payment requirements, the Company estimates the amount of
consideration likely to be paid under the agreement, and offsets such amount
against the proceeds of the instrument issued. The estimate is then reevaluated
at the end of each reporting period, and any changes recognized as a
registration penalty in the results of operations. As further described in Note
13, the Company has instruments that contain registration payment arrangements.
The effect of implementing this has not had a material effect on the financial
statements because the Company considers the probability of payment under the
terms of the agreements to be remote.
Advertising Costs - The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred.
Advertising expenses for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $12,285
and $21,002, respectively and are included as a component of selling, general
and administrative expenses.
F-10
Stock-Based Compensation - The Company has outstanding stock options to
directors and employees, which are described more fully in Note 21. The Company
accounts for its stock options in accordance with ASC 718-10, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, which requires the recognition of the cost of
employee services received in exchanged for an award of equity instruments in
the financial statements and is measured based on the grant date fair value of
the award. ASC 718-10 also requires the stock option compensation expense to be
recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide
service in exchange for the award (the vesting period).
Stock-based employee compensation incurred for the years ended December 31, 2010
and 2009, was $374,783 and $98,281, respectively. During the year ended December
31, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not grant options to purchase shares of
common stock to employees due to the unavailability of issuable stock. The
Company accrued an expense of $370,797 during 2010 for employee options relating
to the employment contracts of these employees.
Income Taxes - The Company utilizes the liability method of accounting for
income taxes. Under the liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are determined based on differences between financial reporting and the tax
basis of assets, liabilities, the carry forward of operating losses and tax
credits, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in
effect when the differences are expected to reverse. An allowance against
deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that such tax
benefits will not be realized. Research tax credits are recognized as utilized.
Concentrations of Risk - Financial instruments, which potentially subject the
Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of trade accounts
receivable. The Company sells substantially to recurring customers, wherein the
customer's ability to pay has previously been evaluated. The Company generally
does not require collateral. Allowances are maintained for potential credit
losses, and such losses have been within management's expectations. At December
31, 2010 and 2009, this allowance was $455,253 and $290,806, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, sales to two customers accounted for 16
percent and 11percent of net sales. These customers are included as part of the
beverage distribution segment.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, sales to three customers accounted for
30 percent, 18 percent and 10 percent of net sales, respectively. Sales from the
largest of these customers are included as part of the marketing and media
segment. The other two customers are included in contract manufacturing and
electronics manufacturing segments. Accounts receivable from one customer was 87
percent of total accounts receivable at December 31, 2009, which created a
concentration of credit risk.
During 2006, PlayBev, entered into an exclusive licensing agreement with
Playboy, whereby PlayBev agreed to internationally market and distribute a new
energy drink carrying the Playboy name and "Rabbit Head" logo symbol. In May
2007, PlayBev entered into an exclusive agreement with the Company to arrange
for the manufacture, marketing and distribution of the energy drinks, other
Playboy-licensed beverages, and related merchandise through various distribution
channels throughout the world. The exclusive arrangement with Playboy creates a
concentration of supply risk. The Company will not be able to market its
products under the Playboy brand without the licensing agreement and would be at
risk to lose significant marketability of its products.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The carrying amounts reported in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements for cash, accounts receivable,
notes payable and accounts payable approximate fair values because of the
immediate or short-term maturities of these financial instruments. The carrying
amounts of the Company's debt obligations approximate fair value.
Loss Per Share - Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss
available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during each period. Diluted loss per share is similarly calculated,
except that the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding would
include common shares that may be issued subject to existing rights with
dilutive potential when applicable. The Company had 2,580,789,574 and
748,731,491 in potentially issuable common shares at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. These potentially issuable common shares were excluded from the
calculation of diluted loss per share because the effects were anti-dilutive.
F-11
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications have been made to the financial
statements to conform to the current year presentation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") issued Release
No. 33-9002, "Interactive Data to Improve Financial Reporting." The final rule
requires companies to provide their financial statements and financial statement
schedules to the SEC and on their corporate websites in interactive data format
using the eXtensible Business Reporting Language ("XBRL"). The rule was adopted
by the SEC to improve the ability of financial statement users to access and
analyze financial data. The SEC adopted a phase-in schedule indicating when
registrants must furnish interactive data. Under this schedule, the Company will
be required to submit filings with financial statement information using XBRL
commencing with its June 30, 2011, quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of XBRL reporting on its financial reporting
process.
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
guidance which clarifies and provides additional disclosure requirements related
to recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. The Company's adoption
of the new standard, during the first quarter of fiscal 2010, did not have a
material impact on its consolidated statements.
In March 2010, the FASB issued guidance to clarify the scope exception for
certain embedded derivative features on debt instruments. The guidance is
effective for the first fiscal quarter after June 15, 2010, with early adoption
permitted. The Company adoption of the new standard, on July 1, 2010, did not
have a material impact on its consolidated statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued guidance to clarify classification of an employee
stock-based payment award when the exercise price is denominated in the currency
of a market in which the underlying equity security trades. The guidance is
effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15,
2010, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of this new guidance on its financial statements.
On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted ASU 2009-17 (ASC Topic 810,
Consolidation), Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with
Variable Interest Entities. ASU 2009-17 amends the consolidation guidance
applicable to variable interest entities ("VIEs") and requires additional
disclosures concerning an enterprise's continuing involvement with VIEs. The
Company evaluated the impact of this guidance and determined that the adoption
resulted in the December 31, 2010, consolidation of PlayBev. See Note 4 for
further details.
NOTE 3 - REALIZATION OF ASSETS
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern.
However, the Company sustained losses of $4,954,638 and $5,814,653 for the years
ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of December 31, 2010 and
2009, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $41,969,908 and $39,140,068,
respectively. In addition, the Company used, rather than provided, cash in its
operations in the amounts of $688,240 and $485,406 for the years ended December
31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These conditions raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
In view of the matters described in the preceding paragraph, recoverability of a
major portion of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets is dependent upon continued operations of the
Company, which in turn is dependent upon the Company's ability to meet its
financing requirements on a continuing basis, to maintain or replace present
financing, to acquire additional capital from investors, and to succeed in its
future operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments
relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or
amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the
Company be unable to continue in existence.
F-12
The Company feels that its beverage business has the potential to have a
substantial impact on its business. The Company plans to focus on the beverage
business and the contract manufacturing business. For the beverage business, the
Company plans to sell existing products and develop new products under the
license agreement with Playboy to a globally expanding market. With regard to
contract manufacturing, the Company goal is to provide customers with
manufacturing solutions for both new and more mature products, as well as across
product generations.
The Company currently provides product marketing services to the direct response
and retail markets for both proprietary and non-proprietary products. This
segment provides campaign management and marketing services for both the Direct
Response, Retail and Beverage Distribution markets. The Company intends to
continue to provide marketing and media services to support its own product
efforts, and offer to customers marketing service in channels involving
television, radio, print media, and the internet.
With respect to electronics assembly and manufacturing, the Company intends to
continue to serve these industries, although it anticipates that its focus will
shift more to providing services on a sub-contract basis.
NOTE 4 - VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY
Consolidation of PlayBev - During the year ended December 31, 2007 the Company,
through AfterBev a 51% voting and 4% economic interest consolidated subsidiary,
purchased a 50% ownership in PlayBev for $750,000. As condition of the purchase,
AfterBev was to develop an acceptable operating plan for PlayBev, procure a
credit facility with a third party at prevailing market rates sufficient to fund
PlayBev's working capital needs, and provide a third party vendor to develop,
manufacture, and distribute the energy drink product. Upon satisfactory
completion of these events, AfterBev was granted an additional 1% ownership
interest in PlayBev bringing its total investment to 51%. Certain participating
rights held by the minority interest holders of PlayBev prevented it being
consolidated with the Company under the majority ownership accounting guidance.
The Company was selected to develop, manufacture, and distribute the energy
drinks as well as provide the credit facility to support the working capital
needs of PlayBev.
The Company has evaluated its involvement with PlayBev to determine whether it
should be consolidated as a variable interest entity. Upon the initial
involvement with PlayBev, it was determined that PlayBev did not have sufficient
equity investment at risk and was determined to be a variable interest entity
based on the following factors:
o The investment was contingent on procuring of a subordinated credit
facility to finance the operations of PlayBev.
o PlayBev was under the obligation to make product license royalty
payments. The licence agreement was for a period of five years. Only
the first year of the royalty was able to be paid upon the original
investment.
At inception, the Company determined that it was not the primary beneficiary of
PlayBev based on the following factors:
o CirTran could not receive access on its own to the Playboy name and
logo intangible assets and only had its initial equity investment at
risk. The credit facility established was to be easily repaid based
upon the projections of management for the sales of the beverage
drinks.
o PlayBev's original owners were under obligation to make the required
royalty payments to Playboy and were under the greatest risk of
absorbing the expected losses (including but not limited to the loss
of the right of the asset).
F-13
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the new provisions under
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"), ASC 810-10, "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities", which caused it to re-evaluate its involvement with
PlayBev. At year end the Company determined that it was the primary beneficiary
of PlayBev and that the assets, liabilities and operations of PlayBev should be
consolidated into its financial statements beginning January 1, 2010. This
assessment was made based on the changes under the guidance indicated above
along with the following factors:
o The nature of the credit facility has changed dramatically since it
was established.
o The credit facility originally was to be used to develop and
market the energy drinks. Even though the product has been
developed, significant costs are continually being added.
PlayBev still has no operations of its own and the Company is
providing all or a majority of the operating activity of
PlayBev. These costs are being pushed through the credit
facility.
o The Company had continually made the royalty payment owed to
Playboy on behalf of PlayBev.
o The credit facility was originally limited to a $2M balance
and the intent was for it to be a revolving line of credit.
Currently the balance owed under the credit facility is
$8,341,247.
o PlayBev has not established that it can generate cash to pay for its
own operations. Instead royalty payments owed to PlayBev by the
Company are offset by the large amount owed to CirTran under the
credit facility.
Included in the accompanying financial statements are the following assets and
liabilities of PlayBev as of December 31, 2010 and for the year then ended:
December 31,
2010
--------------
Other Assets 361
Prepaid Royalty 500,000
--------------
Total Assets 500,361
--------------
Accrued Interest (266,129)
Royalty Payable (552,150)
Notes Payable to shareholders (250,000)
--------------
Total Liabilities (1,068,279)
The assets included above solely relate to prepayments under the Playboy license
agreement that expires in March 2012. The parties have the option to extend the
license agreement at the end of the term. These assets can not be used to settle
PlayBev's liabilities.
F-14
The following table presents the pro-forma balance sheet as of December 31,
2009, as though PlayBev had been consolidated at that date:
December 31,
2009
(Unaudited)
(Pro-Forma)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 8,588
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance
for doubtful accounts of $290,806 472,947
Inventory, net of reserve of $2,045,458 873,650
Prepaid royalty 450,000
Prepaid deposits 82,011
Other 408,195
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current assets 2,295,391
Investment in securities, at cost 300,000
Long-term receivable 1,647,895
Property and equipment, net 544,705
Intellectual property 1,270,358
Other assets, net 14,538
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total assets $ 6,072,887
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities
Checks written in excess of bank balance $ 217,361
Accounts payable 3,047,592
Short term advances payable 2,962,339
Royalties payable 244,568
Accrued liabilities 3,953,402
Deferred revenue 2,275,967
Derivative liability 523,349
Convertible debenture 3,161,355
Current portion of refundable customer deposits 828,933
Current maturities of long-term debt 578,226
Note payable to stockholders 532,084
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current liabilities 18,325,176
Refundable customer deposits, net of current portion 1,719,000
Long-term debt, less current maturities 196,614
Note Payable Related Party -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total liabilities 20,240,790
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stockholders' deficit
CirTran Corporation stockholders' deficit
Common stock, par value .001 1,498,968
Additional paid in capital 29,117,928
Subscription receivable (17,000)
Accumulated deficit (39,352,255)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total CirTran Corporation stockholders deficit (8,752,359)
Noncontrolling interest (5,415,544)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total stockholders deficit (14,167,903)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' deficit $ 6,072,887
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F-15
The following table presents the pro-forma results of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2009, as though PlayBev had been consolidated at the
beginning of the fiscal year presented:
For the year
ended
December 31,
2009
(Unaudited)
(Pro-Forma)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net sales $ 5,956,754
Cost of sales (5,227,965)
Royalty expense (1,580,133)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross loss (851,344)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative expense 6,304,522
Non-cash compensation expense 98,281
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Operating expense 6,402,803
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loss from operations (7,254,147)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other income (expense)
Interest expense (1,280,200)
Settlement of litigation (490,000)
Gain on settlement of litigation 58,704
Gain on sale/leaseback 81,074
Gain on settlement of debt 88,779
Impairment of intellectual properties (156,340)
Impairment of investment in securities (452,000)
Gain on derivative valuation 100,295
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total other expense, net (2,049,688)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Loss $ (9,303,835)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest 273,370
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss attributable to CirTran $ (9,030,465)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic and diluted loss per common share $ (0.01)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic and diluted weighted-average common
shares outstanding 1,490,580,788
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F-16
NOTE 5 - INVENTORY
Inventory consists of the following:
December 31, December 31,
2010 2009
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Raw Materials $ 1,730,086 $ 1,638,256
Work in Process 139,947 313,302
Finished Goods 737,881 967,550
Allowance / Reserve (2,065,558) (2,045,458)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals $ 542,356 $ 873,650
==========================================================================
During 2010 and 2009, write downs of $20,100 and $1,016,502, respectively, were
recorded to reduce items considered obsolete or slow moving to their market
value.
NOTE 6 - PREPAID ROYALTY
The Company prepays royalties to Playboy Enterprises through its subsidiary
PlayBev. During 2010, royalty expense related to Playboy Enterprises was
$1,950,000. As of December 31, 2010, the remaining balance in prepaid royalties
was $500,000.
NOTE 7 - SALE OF PROPERTY
In May 2007, PFE Properties LLC ("PFE"), a Utah limited liability company and
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, sold and the Company leased back the
land and building where the Company presently has its headquarters and
manufacturing facility. The sales proceeds were $2,500,000. With those proceeds,
the Company repaid PFE's mortgage of $1,033,985, along with taxes, fees, and
commissions aggregating $199,303.
The Company then agreed to lease back the property from the buyer, an individual
who later became one of the Company's directors for a period of time. The term
of the lease is for 10 years, with an option to extend the lease for up to three
additional five-year terms. The monthly lease payment is $10,000. The Company
also recorded a gain on the sale of the property of $810,736, which is being
deferred over the life of the lease. The Company recognized $81,074 and $81,074
of the deferral during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
NOTE 8 - ADVANCE BEAUTY SOLUTIONS RECEIVABLE
In June 2006, the Company and Advance Beauty Solutions ("ABS") signed an
agreement to settle certain disputed claims the Company had against ABS.
Pursuant to the settlement of ABS's bankruptcy proceedings and the terms of the
agreement, the Company obtained an allowed claim against ABS in the amount of
$2,350,000. Of this amount, $750,000 was credited to the purchase of
substantially all of ABS's assets under the terms of a separate asset purchase
agreement (see below). Pursuant to the settlement, the Company was allowed to
participate as a general unsecured creditor of ABS in the remaining amount of
$1,600,000. ABS also has a $2,100,000 general unsecured claim of certain
insiders of ABS. Both of these claims are subject to the prior payment of
certain other secured, priority, and non-insider claims in the amount of
$1,507,011. The settlement also resolved a related dispute with Inventory
Capital Group ("ICG"), in which ICG assigned $65,000 of its secured claim
against ABS to the Company.
Pursuant to the terms of the asset purchase agreement, in 2006 the Company
acquired substantially all of ABS's assets in exchange for a cash payment of
$1,125,000, a reduction by $750,000 in the amount owing to the Company, and the
obligation to pay to ABS a royalty equal to $3.00 per True Ceramic Pro ("TCP")
flat iron unit sold by the Company.
F-17
The minimum royalty amount the Company would have to pay is $435,000, and this
amount was included with other long-term obligations of the Company as of
December 31, 2009. The balance of the obligation as of December 31, 2010 and
2009 is $0 and $105,050. During 2010, the Company executed an assignment of
copyrights, thereby assigning the Company's copyrights, trademark, and
infomercial received in the settlement back to ABS (see Note 10). Subsequently,
the Company filed a motion to declare judgment fully satisfied or alternatively
to recoup mutual debts, requesting that the court determine that the Company's
assignment of the copyrights and related intangibles resulted in full
satisfaction of the ABS judgment. The Company assigned and transferred these
intangibles without reservation or exclusion, making ABS the owner of these
assets. The realization of the total $1,582,895 long-term receivable due the
Company from the ABS estate depends on the Company selling approximately one
million TCP units in the future, and gradually offsetting the Company's
proportionate share of the resultant royalty obligation against the receivable.
The Company recognized an allowance expense of $367,024 on the receivable as of
December 31, 2010, due to uncertainty of the timing of sales and cash
collections related to this receivable. The net balance of the receivable as of
December 31, 2010, was $1,215,871.
NOTE 9 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment and estimated service lives consist of the following:
Estimated
Service Lives
2010 2009 in Years
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Production equipment $ 4,025,924 $ 4,038,818 5-10
Leasehold improvements 997,714 997,714 7-10
Office equipment 223,940 240,472 5-10
Other 53,209 53,208 3-7
----------------------------------------------------------------
Total property and equipment 5,300,787 5,330,212
Less accumulated depreciation (4,965,240) (4,785,507)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Property and equipment, net $ 335,547 $ 544,705
----------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 10 - INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
During 2010, the Company executed an assignment of copyrights, thereby assigning
the Company's copyrights, trademark, and infomercial to ABS. Subsequently, the
Company filed a motion to declare judgment fully satisfied or alternatively to
recoup mutual debts, requesting that the court determine that the Company's
assignment of the copyrights and related intangibles resulted in full
satisfaction of the ABS judgment (see note 8). The Company assigned and
transferred these intangibles without reservation or exclusion, making ABS the
owner of these assets. Intellectual property has been reduced by the residual
balance for these intangible assets, $2,535,757 and related amortization of
$1,879,304, as of December 31, 2010. The Company realized a loss on the
assignment of intangibles of $205,463, which is the net book value of the
intangibles assigned less the write-off of net accrued liabilities and related
assets of $450,990.
F-18
Intellectual property and estimated service lives consist of the following:
Estimated
December 31, December 31, Service Lives
2010 2009 in Years
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infomercial development costs $ 54,946 $ 61,445 7
Patents 38,056 38,056 7
ABS Infomerical - 1,186,382 5
Trademark - 1,227,673 7
Copyright - 115,193 7
Website Development Costs 150,000 150,000 5
----------------------------------------------------------------
Total intellectual property $ 243,002 $ 2,778,749
Less accumulated amortization (73,543) (1,508,391)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Intellectual property, net $ 169,459 $ 1,270,358
----------------------------------------------------------------
The estimated amortization expenses for the next five years are as follows:
Year Ending December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------
2011 $ 37,854
2012 34,351
2013 32,418
2014 32,418
2015 32,418
--------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 169,459
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 11 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Play Beverages, LLC
During 2006, Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. ("Playboy"), entered into a
licensing agreement with Play Beverages, LLC ("PlayBev"), then an unrelated
Delaware limited liability company, whereby PlayBev agreed to internationally
market and distribute a new energy drink carrying the Playboy name and "Rabbit
Head" logo symbol. In May 2007, PlayBev entered into an exclusive agreement with
the Company to arrange for the manufacture, marketing and distribution of the
energy drinks, other Playboy-licensed beverages, and related merchandise through
various distribution channels throughout the world.
In an effort to finance the initial development and marketing of the new drink,
the Company with other investors formed After Bev Group LLC ("AfterBev"), a
California limited liability company and partially owned, consolidated
subsidiary of the Company. The Company contributed its expertise in exchange for
an initial 84 percent membership interest in AfterBev. The other initial
AfterBev members contributed $500,000 in exchange for the remaining 16 percent.
The Company borrowed an additional $250,000 from an individual, and contributed
the total $750,000 to PlayBev in exchange for a 51 percent interest in PlayBev's
cash distributions. The Company previously recorded this $750,000 amount as an
investment in PlayBev, accounted for under the cost method. PlayBev then
remitted these funds to Playboy as part of a guaranteed royalty prepayment.
F-19
Along with the membership interest granted the Company, PlayBev agreed to
appoint the Company's president and one of the Company's directors to two of
PlayBev's three executive management positions. Additionally, an unrelated
executive manager of PlayBev resigned, leaving the remaining two executive
management positions occupied by the Company president and one of the Company's
directors. On August 23, 2008, PlayBev's members agreed to amend its operating
agreement to change the required membership vote on major managerial and
organizational decisions from 75 percent to 95 percent. Since 2007, the two
affiliates personally purchased membership interests from PlayBev directly and
from other PlayBev members constituting an additional 23.1 percent, which
aggregated 34.35 percent. Despite the combined 90.5 percent interest owned by
these affiliates and the Company, the Company cannot unilaterally control
significant operating decisions of PlayBev, as the amended operating agreement
requires that various major operating and organizational decisions be agreed to
by at least 95 percent of all members. The other members of PlayBev are not
affiliated with the Company. In previous years, management concluded that while
PlayBev is a related party, the Company did not have the ability to unilaterally
control significant operating decisions of PlayBev, and therefore had not
accounted for PlayBev's operations as if it was a consolidated subsidiary.
However, on January 1, 2010, the Company adopted ASU 2009-17 (ASC Topic 810,
Consolidation), Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with
Variable Interest Entities. ASU 2009-17 amends the consolidation guidance
applicable to variable interest entities ("VIEs") and requires additional
disclosures concerning an enterprise's continuing involvement with VIEs. The
Company evaluated the impact of this guidance and determined that the adoption
resulted in the December 31, 2010, consolidation of PlayBev (see note 7).
PlayBev has no operations, so under the terms of the exclusive manufacturing and
distribution agreement, the Company was appointed as the master manufacturer and
distributor of the beverages and other products that PlayBev licensed from
Playboy. In so doing, the Company assumed all the risk of collecting amounts
owed from customers, and contracting with vendors for manufacturing and
marketing activities. In addition, PlayBev is owed a royalty from the Company
equal to the Company's gross profits from collected beverage sales, less 20
percent of the Company's related cost of goods sold, and 6 percent of the
Company's gross sales. Any intercompany transactions have been eliminated in the
consolidated financials as of December 31, 2010.
The Company also agreed to provide services to PlayBev for initial development,
marketing, and promotion of the new beverage.
After Bev Group, LLC
Following AfterBev's organization in May 2007, the Company entered into
consulting agreements with two individuals, one of whom had loaned the Company
$250,000 when the Company invested in PlayBev, and the other one was a Company
director. The agreements provided that the Company assign to each individual
approximately one-third of the Company's share in future AfterBev cash
distributions, in exchange for their assistance in the initial AfterBev
organization and planning, along with their continued assistance in subsequent
beverage development and distribution activities. The agreements also provided
that as the Company sold a portion of its membership interest in AfterBev, the
individuals would each be owed their proportional assigned share distributions
in the proceeds of such a sale. The actual payment of the distributions depended
on what the Company did with the sale proceeds. If the Company used the proceeds
to help finance beverage development and marketing activities, the payment of
distributions would be deferred, pending collections from customers once
beverage product sales eventually commenced. Otherwise, the proportional
assigned share distributions would be due to the two individuals.
Throughout the balance of 2007, as energy drink development and marketing
activities progressed, the Company raised additional funds by selling portions
of its membership interest in AfterBev to other investors, some of whom were
Company stockholders. In some cases, the Company sold a portion of its
membership interest, including voting rights. In other cases, the Company sold
merely a portion of its share of future AfterBev profits and losses. By the end
of 2007, after taking into account the two interests it had assigned, the
Company had retained a net 14 percent interest in AfterBev's profits and losses,
but had retained 52 percent of all voting rights in AfterBev. The Company
recorded the receipt of these net funds as increases to its existing minority
interest in AfterBev, and the rest as amounts owing as distributable proceeds
payable to the two individuals with assigned interests of the Company's original
share of AfterBev.
F-20
At the end of 2007, the Company agreed to convert the amount owing to one of the
individuals into a promissory note. In exchange, the individual agreed to
relinquish his approximately one-third portion of the Company's remaining share
of AfterBev's profits and losses. Instead, the individual received a membership
interest in AfterBev. In January 2008, the other assignee, which is one of the
Company's directors, similarly agreed to relinquish the distributable proceeds
owed to him, in exchange for an interest in AfterBev's profits and losses.
Accordingly, he purchased a 24 percent interest in AfterBev's profits and losses
in exchange for foregoing $863,973 in amounts due to him. Of this 24 percent, by
the end of December 31, 2008, the director had sold or transferred 23 percent to
unrelated investors and retained the remaining 1 percent interest in AfterBev's
profits and losses. In turn, the director loaned $834,393 to the company in the
form of unsecured advances. Of the amounts loaned, $600,000 was used to purchase
interest in PlayBev directly which resulted in a reduction of $600,000 of
amounts owed by PlayBev to the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2009,
the director advanced an additional $500,000 to the Company for his purchase of
an additional 3 percent interest in PlayBev, which resulted in a reduction of
$500,000 of amounts owed by PlayBev to the Company. In addition, during the year
ended December 31, 2009, one of the directors of the Company and the Company
president purchased 6 percent and 5 percent of AfterBev shares, respectively, in
private sales from existing shareholders of Afterbev. AfterBev has had no
operations since its inception.
Global Marketing Alliance
The Company entered into an agreement with Global Marketing Alliance ("GMA"),
and hired GMA's owner as the Vice President of CTO, one of the Company's
subsidiaries. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company outsources to GMA
the online marketing and sales activities associated with the Company's CTO
products. In return, the Company provides bookkeeping and management consulting
services to GMA, and pays GMA a fee equal to five percent of CTO's online net
sales. In addition, GMA assigned to the Company all of its web-hosting and
training contracts effective as of January 1, 2007, along with the revenue
earned thereon, and the Company also assumed the related contractual performance
obligations. The Company recognizes the revenue collected under the GMA
contracts, and remits back to GMA a management fee approximating their actual
costs. The Company recognized revenues from GMA related products and services in
the amount of $1,095,086 and $2,572,955 for the years ended December 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively.
Transactions involving Officers, Directors, and Stockholders
Don L. Buehner was appointed to the Company's Board of Directors during 2007.
Prior to his appointment as a director, Mr. Buehner bought the Company's
building in a sale/leaseback transaction. The term of the lease is for 10 years,
with an option to extend the lease for up to three additional five-year terms.
The Company pays Mr. Buehner a monthly lease payment of $10,000, which is
subject to annual adjustments in relation to the Consumer Price Index. Mr.
Buehner retired from the Company's Board of Directors following the Company's
Annual Meeting of Shareholders on June 18, 2008.
In 2007, the Company appointed Fadi Nora to its Board of Directors. In addition
to compensation the Company normally pays to non-employee members of the Board,
Mr. Nora is entitled to a quarterly bonus equal to 0.5 percent of any gross
sales earned by the Company directly through Mr. Nora's efforts. As of December
31, 2010 the Company owed $45,826 under this arrangement. During the year ended
December 31, 2010, Mr. Nora loaned the Company a total of $667,560. Mr. Nora
received cash payments totaling $96,500 from the Company during the year ended
December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, the Company still owed Mr. Nora
$686,999 in the form of unsecured advances. These advances and short term bridge
loans were approved by the Board of Directors under a 5% borrowing fee. The
borrowing fees were waived by Mr. Nora on these loans. In addition, the Company
owed Mr. Nora $981,046 in accounts payable as of December 31, 2010 for selling,
general and administrative expenses that were paid for by Mr. Nora on a personal
credit card.
In addition, on July 14, 2009, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase
Agreement with Mr. Nora to purchase 75,000,000 shares of common stock of the
Company at a purchase price of $.003 per share, for a total of $225,000, payable
through the conversion of outstanding loans made by the director to the Company.
Mr. Nora and the Company acknowledged in the purchase agreement that the Company
did not have sufficient shares to satisfy the issuances, and agreed that the
shares would be issued once the Company has sufficient shares to do so. As of
December 31, 2010, the Company showed the balance of $225,000 as an accrued
liability on the balance sheet.
F-21
In 2007, the Company issued a 10 percent promissory note to a family member of
the Company president in exchange for $300,000. The note was due on demand after
May 2008. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company repaid
principal and interest totaling $71,013 and $22,434, respectively. At December
31, 2010, the principal amount owing on the note was $159,442. On March 31,
2008, the Company issued to this same family member, along with four other
Company shareholders, promissory notes totaling $315,000. The family member's
note was for $105,000. Under the terms of all the notes, the Company received
total proceeds of $300,000, and agreed to repay the amount received plus a five
percent borrowing fee. The notes were due April 30, 2008, after which they were
due on demand, with interest accruing at 12 percent per annum. During 2010, the
Company paid $52,500 towards the outstanding notes. The principal balance owing
on the promissory notes as of December 31, 2010, totaled $51,916
On April 2, 2009, the Company President and a Director of the Company borrowed
from a third party a total of $890,000 in the form of four short-term promissory
notes. The Company President and a Director of the Company signed personally for
the notes. Since the loans were used to pay obligations of the Company, the
Company has assumed full responsibility for the notes. Two of the notes were for
a term of 60 days, with a 60 day grace period, a third note was for a term of 90
days, and a fourth note was for 24 days. Loan fees totaling $103,418 were
incurred with the issuance of the notes and are payable upon maturity of the
notes. During the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company paid
$140,000 and $125,000, respectively, against the loans, offset by an additional
$75,000 in borrowings. As of December 31, 2010, the balance of the loans totaled
$695,162. As of December 31, 2010, all four notes were in default and are
accruing interest at the default rate of 36 percent per year.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company owed the Company president a total of
$310,257 in unsecured advances, and $136,827 in accrued options. These advances
and short term bridge loans were approved by the Board of Directors under a 5%
borrowing fee. The borrowing fees were waived by our president on these loans.
On July 14, 2009, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with the
president of the Company to purchase 50,000,000 shares of common stock of the
Company at a purchase price of $.003 per share, for a total amount of $150,000,
payable through the conversion of outstanding loans made by the president of the
Company to the Company. Mr. Hawatmeh and the Company acknowledged in the
purchase agreement that the Company did not have sufficient shares to satisfy
the issuances, and agreed that the shares would be issued once the Company has
sufficient shares to do so. As of December 31, 2010, the Company showed the
balance of $150,000 as an accrued liability on the balance sheet.
On March 5, 2010, the Company entered into a Separation Agreement ("Agreement")
with Shaher Hawatmeh. As of the date of the Agreement, Shaher Hawatmeh's
employment with the Company was terminated and he no longer has any further
employment obligations with the Company. In consideration of his execution of
this Agreement, the Company will pay Shaher Hawatmeh's "Separation Pay" of
$210,000 in twenty-six bi-weekly payments. The first payment of the Separation
Pay was to begin on March 19, 2010. On April 2, 2010, the Company made the first
payment to Shaher Hawatmeh. Additional terms of the separation agreement include
payment of all amounts necessary to cover health and medial premiums on behalf
of Shaher Hawatmeh, his spouse and dependents through April 20, 2010, all
outstanding car allowances and expense ($750) due and owing as of February 28,
2010, satisfaction and payment by the Company (with a complete release of Shaher
Hawatmeh) of all outstanding amounts due and owing on the Company Corporate
American Express Card (issued in the name of Shaher) and the issuance and
delivery to Shaher Hawatmeh of ten million (10,000,000) share of the Company's
common stock within a reasonable time following authorization by the Company's
shareholders of sufficient shares to cover such issuance. The fair market value
of the shares aggregated to $50,000 as of March 5, 2010, based on the $.005 per
share value as of the effective date of the separation agreement, and has been
included in accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2010.
Sublease
In an effort to operate more efficiently and focus resources on higher margin
areas, on March 5, 2010, the Company and Katana Electronics, LLC, a Utah limited
liability company ("Katana") entered into certain agreements to reduce its
costs. The Agreements include an Assignment and Assumption Agreement, an
Equipment Lease, and a Sublease Agreement relating to the Company's property.
Pursuant to the terms of the Sublease, the Company will sublease a certain
portion of the Premises to Katana consisting of the warehouse and office space
used as of the close of business on March 4, 2010. The term of the Sublease is
for two (2) months with automatic renewal periods of one month each. The base
rent under the Sublease is $8,500 per month. The Sublease contains normal and
customary use restrictions, indemnification rights and obligations, default
provisions and termination rights. Under Agreements signed, the Company
continues to have rights to operate as a contract manufacturer in the future in
the US and offshore. The income from the sublease to Katana during 2010 was
$85,500 and was recognized as other income.
F-22
NOTE 12 - ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Related party expenses consist of reimbursable business expenses that were paid
for by a manager of the Company.
Accrued tax liabilities consist of delinquent payroll taxes, interest and
penalties owed by the Company to the IRS and other tax entities.(see note 19).
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
December 31, December 31,
2010 2009
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payroll and compensation expense $ (1,542,684) $ (884,934)
Tax liabilities (1,029,449) (883,621)
Related party expenses (981,046) (323,169)
Defered gain on sale leaseback (507,216) (588,290)
Royalty expense (552,150) (22,369)
Other accrued expenses (149,066) (239,493)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals $ (4,761,611) $ (2,941,876)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 13 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation and Claims - Various vendors and service providers have notified the
Company that they believe they have claims against the Company totaling
approximately $1,255,000. The Company has determined the probability of
realizing any loss on these claims is remote. The Company has made no accrual
for these claims and is currently in the process of negotiating the dismissal of
these claims.
Registration rights agreements - In December 2005, in connection with the
Company's issuance of a convertible debenture to YA Global Investments, L.P.,
formerly known as Cornell Capital Partners, L.P. ("YA Global") (see Note 11),
the Company granted to YA Global registration rights, pursuant to which the
Company agreed to file, within 120 days of the closing of the purchase of the
debenture, a registration statement to register the resale of shares of the
Company's common stock issuable upon conversion of the debenture. The Company
also agreed to use its best efforts to have the registration statement declared
effective within 270 days after filing the registration statement. The Company
agreed to register the resale of up to 32,608,696 shares and 10,000,000
warrants, and to keep the registration statement effective until all of the
shares issuable upon conversion of the debenture have been sold.
In August 2006, in connection with the Company's issuance of a second
convertible debenture to YA Global (see Note 8), the Company granted YA Global
registration rights, pursuant to which the Company agreed to file, within 120
days of the closing of the purchase of the debenture, a registration statement
to register the resale of shares of the Company's common stock issuable upon
conversion of the debenture. The Company also agreed to use its best efforts to
have the registration statement declared effective within 270 days after filing
the registration statement. The Company agreed to register the resale of up to
74,291,304 shares and 15,000,000 warrants, and to keep such registration
statement effective until all of the shares issuable upon conversion of the
debenture have been sold.
Previously, YA Global has agreed to extensions of the filing deadlines inherent
in the terms of the two convertible debentures mentioned above, and in February
2008 agreed to extend the filing deadlines to December 31, 2008. On August 11,
2009, the Company and YA Global entered into a forbearance agreement related to
the three convertible debentures issued by the Company to YA or its predecessor
entities (see note 15 - Convertible Debentures).
F-23
Under the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to waive any claims against
YA, entered into a Global Security Agreement (discussed below), a Global
Guaranty Agreement (discussed below), and an amendment of a warrant granted to
YA in connection with the issuance of the August Debenture; agreed to seek to
obtain waivers from the Company's landlords at its properties in Utah,
California, and Arkansas; agreed to seek to obtain deposit account control
agreements from the Company's banks and depository institutions; and to repay
the Company's obligations under the Debentures.
The repayment terms of the Forbearance Agreement required an initial payment of
$125,000 upon signing the agreement. Beginning September 1, 2009 through May 1,
2010 monthly payments ranging from $150,000 to $300,000 are due for total
payments of $2,825,000. The remaining balance was due July 1, 2010.
Pursuant to the Forbearance Agreement, the Company, subject to the consent of
YA, may choose to pay all or any portion of the monthly payments in common
stock, at a conversion price used to determine the number of shares of common
stock equal to 85 percent of the lowest closing bid price of the Company's
common stock during the ten trading days prior to the payment date.
YA agreed to forbear from enforcing its rights and remedies as a result of the
existing defaults and/or converting the Debentures into shares of the Company's
common stock, until the earlier of the occurrence of a Termination Event (as
defined in the Forbearance Agreement), or July 1, 2010.
The Company, YA, and certain of the Company's subsidiaries also entered into a
Global Security Agreement (the "GSA") in connection with the Forbearance
Agreement. Under the GSA, the Company and the participating subsidiaries pledged
and granted to YA a security interest in all assets and personal property of the
Company and each participating subsidiary as security for the payment or
performance in full of the obligations set forth in the Forbearance Agreement.
Additionally, the Company, YA, and certain of the Company's subsidiaries also
entered into a Global Guaranty Agreement (the "GGA") in connection with the
Forbearance Agreement. Under the GGA, the Company and the participating
subsidiaries guaranteed to YA the full payment and prompt performance of all of
the obligations set forth in the Forbearance Agreement.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had defaulted on its payment obligations
under the Forbearance Agreement, and the Company was in the process of
negotiating another forbearance agreement to extend the payment dates, although
no agreement had been executed as of December 31, 2010.
Subsequently, on January 24, 2011, the Company, and YA Global Investments
finalized an amended and restated forbearance agreement and related agreements,
which related to certain financing arrangements and agreements between the
Company and YA and its predecessors. The A&R Forbearance Agreement was dated as
of January 7, 2011, but the final conditions for closing were met on January 24,
2011. A more detailed description of the Forbearance Agreement and related
agreements, including the payment schedule and other terms and conditions, can
be found in note 24.
The Company currently has issued and outstanding options, warrants, convertible
notes and other instruments for the acquisition of the Company's common stock in
excess of the available authorized but non-issued shares of common stock
provided for under the Company's Articles of Incorporation, as amended. As a
consequence, in the event that the holders of such instruments requiring the
issuance, in the aggregate, of a number of shares of common stock that would,
when combined with the previously issued and outstanding common stock of the
Company exceed the authorized capital of the Company, seek to exercise their
rights to acquire shares under those instruments, the Company will be required
to increase the number of authorized shares or effect a reverse split of the
outstanding shares in order to provide sufficient shares for issuance under
those instruments.
F-24
Employment Agreements -
On August 1, 2009, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with Mr.
Hawatmeh, our President. The term of the employment agreement continues until
August 31, 2014, and automatically extends for successive one year periods, with
an annual base salary of $345,000. The employment agreement also grants to Mr.
Hawatmeh options to purchase a minimum of 6,000,000 shares of the Company's
stock each year, with the exercise price of the options being the market price
of the Company's common stock as of the grant date. The Employment Agreement
also provides for health insurance coverage, cell phone, car allowance, life
insurance, and director and officer liability insurance, as well as any other
bonus approved by the Board. The employment agreement includes additional
incentive compensation as follows: a quarterly bonus equal to 5 percent of the
Company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for the
applicable quarter; bonus(es) equal to 1.0 percent of the net purchase price of
any acquisitions completed by the Company that are directly generated and
arranged by Mr. Hawatmeh; and an annual bonus (payable quarterly) equal to 1
percent of the gross sales, net of returns and allowances of all beverage
products of the Company and its affiliates for the most recent fiscal year.
During 2010, the Company incurred $42,581 of non-cash compensation expense
related to accrual for employee stock options to be awarded per the employment
contract with the president of the Company.
Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Hawatmeh's employment may be
terminated for cause, or upon death or disability, in which event the Company is
required to pay Mr. Hawatmeh any unpaid base salary and unpaid earned bonuses.
In the event that Mr. Hawatmeh is terminated without cause, the Company is
required to pay to Mr. Hawatmeh (i) within thirty (30) days following such
termination, any benefit, incentive or equity plan, program or practice (the
"Accrued Obligations") paid when the bonus would have been paid Employee if
employed; (ii) within thirty (30) days following such termination (or on the
earliest later date as may be required by Internal Revenue Code Section 409A to
the extent applicable), a lump sum equal to thirty (30) month's annual base
salary, (iii) bonus(es) owing under the employment agreement for the two year
period after the date of termination (net of an bonus amounts paid as Accrued
Obligations) based on actual results for the applicable quarters and fiscal
years; and (iv) within twelve (12) months following such termination (or on the
earliest later date as may be required by Internal Revenue Code Section 409A to
the extent applicable), a lump sum equal to thirty (30) month's Annual Base
Salary; provided that if Employee is terminated without cause in contemplation
of, or within one (1) year, after a change in control, then two (2) times such
annual base salary and bonus payment amounts.
On May 1, 2009, PlayBev, a newly consolidated entity, entered into compensation
agreements with its managers, Mr. Hawatmeh and Mr. Nora. The agreed compensation
consists of a monthly fee of $10,000 for each manager, reimbursement of
reasonable expenses on behalf of the Company, a car allowance for Mr. Nora of
$1,000 per month to cover the cost of use, fuel and repairs. The Company has
accrued $420,000 in compensation, which is included in related party payables as
of December 31, 2010.
The company has active employment contracts with several of its employees that
require payment of non-cash compensation in a fixed number of shares. During the
year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not grant options to
purchase shares of common stock to employees due to the unavailability of
issuable stock. The Company accrued an expense of $370,797 during 2010 for
employee options relating to the employment contracts of these employees.
NOTE 14 - NOTES PAYABLE
On March 6, 2007, the PlayBev, a newly consolidated entity, issued a 10 percent,
1 year, $250,000 promissory note to a group of three investors. The Company has
since defaulted on the note and has accrued interest at the default rate of 18
percent per year. The outstanding balance of the loan as of December 31, 2010,
was $250,000 in principal and $207,910 in accrued interest expense.
F-25
In February 2008, the Company issued a 10 percent, three-year, $700,000
promissory note to an investor. No interim principal payments are required, but
accrued interest is due quarterly. The investor also received five-year warrants
to purchase up to 75,000,000 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging
from $0.02 to $0.50 per share. The Company determined that the warrants fell
under derivative accounting treatment, and recorded the initial carrying value
of a derivative liability equal to the fair value of the warrants at the time of
issuance. At the same time, a discount equal to the face amount of the note was
recorded, to be recognized ratably to interest expense. Interest expense of
$233,560 and $233,760 was accreted during the years ended December, 2010 and
2009. A total of $663,935 has been accreted against the note as of December 31,
2010. The carrying value of the note will continue to be accreted over the life
of the note until the carrying value equals the face value of $700,000. As of
December 31, 2010, the balance of the note was $663,935. The fair value of the
derivative liability stemming from the associated warrants as of December 31,
2010, was $68,857. The company is in default on this note as of December 31,
2010.
In March 2008, the Company converted $75,000 owed to an unrelated member of
AfterBev into a one-year, 10 percent promissory note, with interest payable
quarterly. The balance as of December 31, 2010, was $75,000. The note renews
monthly. The company is in default on this note as of December 31, 2010.
Notes payable consisted of the following at December 31, 2010 and 2009:
2010 2009
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum Royalty Payments note, due in June 2008 $ - $ 105,050
Settlement note, ten monthly payments, no
interest 59,769 60,000
Promissory note to a stockholder, 10% stated
interest rate, unsecured, interest due
quarterly, due February 2011 159,442 208,014
Promissory note to an investor, 10% stated
interest rate, face value discounted and to be
accreted over the life of the note. Due on
demand. 663,935 430,375
Promissory note to an unrelated member of
AfterBev, 10% stated interest interest payable
quarterly. Due on demand. 75,000 75,000
Promissory notes to 3 investors, 12% stated
interest, 5% borrowing fee, due on demand
due to related party. 51,916 104,415
Promissory note to members of PlayBev, 10%
stated interest due on demand. 250,000 -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,260,062 982,854
Less current maturities (1,260,062) (786,240)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-term portion of notes payable $ - $ 196,614
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F-26
NOTE 15 - CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES
The Company has financial instruments that are considered derivatives, or
contain embedded features subject to derivative accounting. Embedded derivatives
are valued separate from the host instrument and are recognized as derivative
liabilities in the Company's balance sheet. The Company measures these
instruments at their estimated fair value, and recognizes changes in their
estimated fair value in results of operations during the period of change. The
Company has estimated the fair value of these embedded derivatives using the
Black-Scholes model. The fair value of the derivative instruments are measured
each quarter. The fair market value of the derivatives aggregated $1,412,646,
using the following assumptions: term of between 0.39 - 2.16 year, volatility of
between 176.74 and 246.61 percent and a discount rate of between 0.07% and 0.61
percent.
Highgate House Funds, Ltd. - In May 2005, the Company entered into an agreement
with Highgate to issue a $3,750,000, 5 percent Secured Convertible Debenture
(the "Debenture"). The Debenture was originally due December 2007, and is
secured by all of the Company's assets. Highgate extended the maturity date of
the Debenture to December 31, 2008. As of January 1, 2008 the interest rate
increased to 12 percent. On August 11, 2009, the Company and YA Global entered
into a forbearance agreement and related agreements. The Company agreed to repay
the Company's obligations under the Debentures per an agreed schedule.
Accrued interest was originally payable at the time of maturity or conversion.
Per the Forbearance Agreement, the scheduled payments are to be applied first to
outstanding accrued interest. The Company may, at its option, elect to pay
accrued interest in cash or shares of our common stock, with the conversion
price to be used to determine the number of shares of common stock being equal
to 85 percent of the lowest closing bid price of the Company's common stock
during the ten trading days prior to the payment day. Accrued interest paid
during the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, totaled $50,000. Interest
accrued during the twelve months ending December 31, 2010, totaled $74,416. The
balance of accrued interest owed at December 31, 2010, was $79,399.
Subsequently, on January 24, 2011, the Company, certain of its subsidiaries
listed below, and YA Global Investments (formerly known as Cornell Capital
Partners, LP) ("YA") finalized an amended and restated forbearance agreement
(the "A&R Forbearance Agreement") and related agreements, which related to
certain financing arrangements and agreements between the Company and YA and its
predecessors. The A&R Forbearance Agreement was dated as of January 7, 2011, but
the final conditions for closing were met on January 24, 2011. The Company's
subsidiaries that entered into the A&R Forbearance Agreement were Racore
Network, Inc. (hereinafter, "Racore"); Cirtran - Asia, Inc. (hereinafter,
"Asia"); CIRTRAN BEVERAGE CORP. (hereinafter, "Beverage"); Cirtran Media Corp.
(hereinafter, "Media"); Cirtran Online Corp. (hereinafter, "Online"); Cirtran
Products Corp. (hereinafter, "Products"); and Cirtran Corporation (Utah)
(hereinafter, "Cirtran Sub," and together with Racore, Asia, Beverage, Media,
Online and Products, collectively, jointly and severally, the "Guarantors"). A
more detailed description of the A&R Forbearance Agreement and related
agreements, including the payment schedule and other terms and conditions, can
be found in the section below, "Debentures - A&R Forbearance Agreement," and the
A&R Forbearance Agreement and related exhibits were filed as exhibits to a
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2011.
The Company determined that certain conversion features of the Debenture fell
under derivative accounting treatment. Since May 2005, the carrying value has
been accreted over the life of the debenture until December 31, 2007, the
original maturity date. As of that date, the carrying value of the Debenture was
$970,136, which was the remaining face value of the debenture.
In connection with the issuance of the Debenture, $2,265,000 of the proceeds was
used to repay earlier promissory notes. Fees of $256,433, withheld from the
proceeds, were capitalized and were amortized over the life of the note.
F-27
During 2006, Highgate converted $1,000,000 of Debenture principal and accrued
interest into a total of 37,373,283 shares of common stock. During 2007,
Highgate converted $1,979,864 of Debenture principal and accrued interest into a
total of 264,518,952 shares of common stock. During the year ended December 31,
2008 Highgate converted $350,000 of debenture principle into a total of
36,085,960 shares of common stock. The carrying value of the Debenture as of
December 31, 2010 was $620,136. The fair value of the derivative liability
stemming from the debenture's conversion feature was determined to be $227,392
as of December 31, 2010.
YA Global December Debenture - In December 2005, the Company entered into an
agreement with YA Global to issue a $1,500,000, 5 percent Secured Convertible
Debenture (the "December Debenture"). The December Debenture was originally due
July 30, 2008, and has a security interest in all the Company's assets,
subordinate to the Highgate security interest. YA Global also agreed to extend
the maturity date of the December Debenture to December 31, 2008. As of January
1, 2008 the interest rate was increased to 12 percent. The Company agreed to
repay the Company's obligations under the Debentures per an agreed schedule.
Accrued interest was originally payable at the time of maturity or conversion.
Per the Forbearance Agreement, the scheduled payments are to be applied first to
outstanding accrued interest. The Company may, at its option, elect to pay
accrued interest in cash or shares of our common stock, with the conversion
price to be used to determine the number of shares of common stock being equal
to 85 percent of the lowest closing bid price of the Company's common stock
during the ten trading days prior to the payment day. No accrued interest was
paid during the twelve months ended December 31, 2010. Interest accrued during
the twelve months ending December 31, 2010, totaled $180,000. The balance of
accrued interest owed at December 31, 2010, was $345,853.
Subsequently, on January 24, 2011, the Company, certain of its subsidiaries
listed below, and YA Global Investments (formerly known as Cornell Capital
Partners, LP) ("YA") finalized an amended and restated forbearance agreement
(the "A&R Forbearance Agreement") and related agreements, which related to
certain financing arrangements and agreements between the Company and YA and its
predecessors. The A&R Forbearance Agreement was dated as of January 7, 2011, but
the final conditions for closing were met on January 24, 2011. The Company's
subsidiaries that entered into the A&R Forbearance Agreement were Racore
Network, Inc. (hereinafter, "Racore"); Cirtran - Asia, Inc. (hereinafter,
"Asia"); CIRTRAN BEVERAGE CORP. (hereinafter, "Beverage"); Cirtran Media Corp.
(hereinafter, "Media"); Cirtran Online Corp. (hereinafter, "Online"); Cirtran
Products Corp. (hereinafter, "Products"); and Cirtran Corporation (Utah)
(hereinafter, "Cirtran Sub," and together with Racore, Asia, Beverage, Media,
Online and Products, collectively, jointly and severally, the "Guarantors"). A
more detailed description of the A&R Forbearance Agreement and related
agreements, including the payment schedule and other terms and conditions, can
be found in the section below, "Debentures - A&R Forbearance Agreement," and the
A&R Forbearance Agreement and related exhibits were filed as exhibits to a
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2011.
The YA Global Debenture was issued with 10,000,000 warrants, with an exercise
price of $0.09 per share. The warrants vest immediately and have a three-year
life. As a result of the May 2007 1.2-for1 forward stock split, the effective
number of vested warrants increased to 12,000,000. On December 31, 2008, all
12,000,000 warrants expired.
The Company also granted YA Global registration rights related to the shares of
the Company's common stock issuable upon the conversion of the December
Debenture and the exercise of the warrants. As of the date of this Report, no
registration statement had been filed.
The Company determined that the conversion features on the December Debenture
and the associated warrants fell under derivative accounting treatment. The
carrying value was accreted over the life of the December Debenture until August
31, 2008, a former maturity date, at which time the value of the December
Debenture reached $1,500,000.
In connection with the issuance of the December Debenture, fees of $130,000,
withheld from the proceeds, were capitalized and are being amortized over the
life of the December Debenture.
F-28
As of December 31, 2010, YA Global had not converted any of the December
Debenture into shares of the Company's common stock. As a result, the carrying
value of the debenture as of December 31, 2010, remains $1,500,000. The fair
value of the derivative liability stemming from the December Debenture's
conversion feature as of December 30, 2010, was determined to be $600,015.
YA Global August Debenture - In August 2006, the Company entered into another
agreement with YA Global relating to the issuance by the Company of another 5
percent Secured Convertible Debenture, due in April 2009, in the principal
amount of $1,500,000 (the "August Debenture").
Accrued interest was originally payable at the time of maturity or conversion.
Per the Forbearance Agreement, the scheduled payments are to be applied first to
outstanding accrued interest. The Company may, at its option, elect to pay
accrued interest in cash or shares of our common stock, with the conversion
price to be used to determine the number of shares of common stock being equal
to 85 percent of the lowest closing bid price of the Company's common stock
during the ten trading days prior to the payment day. Interest accrued during
the twelve months ending December 31, 2010, totaled $124,946. The balance of
accrued interest owed at December 31, 2010, was $533,206.
Subsequently, on January 24, 2011, the Company, certain of its subsidiaries
listed below, and YA Global Investments (formerly known as Cornell Capital
Partners, LP) ("YA") finalized an amended and restated forbearance agreement
(the "A&R Forbearance Agreement") and related agreements, which related to
certain financing arrangements and agreements between the Company and YA and its
predecessors. The A&R Forbearance Agreement was dated as of January 7, 2011, but
the final conditions for closing were met on January 24, 2011. The Company's
subsidiaries that entered into the A&R Forbearance Agreement were Racore
Network, Inc. (hereinafter, "Racore"); Cirtran - Asia, Inc. (hereinafter,
"Asia"); CIRTRAN BEVERAGE CORP. (hereinafter, "Beverage"); Cirtran Media Corp.
(hereinafter, "Media"); Cirtran Online Corp. (hereinafter, "Online"); Cirtran
Products Corp. (hereinafter, "Products"); and Cirtran Corporation (Utah)
(hereinafter, "Cirtran Sub," and together with Racore, Asia, Beverage, Media,
Online and Products, collectively, jointly and severally, the "Guarantors"). A
more detailed description of the A&R Forbearance Agreement and related
agreements, including the payment schedule and other terms and conditions, can
be found in the section below, "Debentures - A&R Forbearance Agreement," and the
A&R Forbearance Agreement and related exhibits were filed as exhibits to a
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2011.
In connection with the August Purchase Agreement, the Company also agreed to
grant to YA Global warrants (the "Warrants") to purchase up to an additional
15,000,000 shares of our common stock. The Warrants have an exercise price of
$0.06 per share, and originally were to expire three years from the date of
issuance. In connection with the Forbearance Agreement, the term of the warrants
was extended to August 23, 2010. The Warrants also provide for cashless exercise
if at the time of exercise there is not an effective registration statement or
if an event of default has occurred. As a result of the May 2007 1.2-for 1
forward stock split, the effective number of outstanding warrants increased to
18,000,000.
In connection with the issuance of the August Debenture, the Company also
granted YA Global registration rights related to the common stock issuable upon
conversion of the August Debenture and the exercise of the Warrants. As of the
date of this report, no registration statement had been filed.
The Company determined that the conversion features on the August Debenture and
the associated warrants fell under derivative accounting treatment. The carrying
value will be accreted each quarter over the life of the August Debenture until
the carrying value equals the face value of $1,500,000. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, YA Global chose to convert $341,160 of the convertible
debenture into 139,136,360 shares of common stock.
YA Global chose to convert $117,622 of the convertible debenture into 72,710,337
shares of common stock during the year ended December 31, 2009. As of December
31, 2010, the carrying value of the August Debenture was $1,041,218. The fair
value of the derivative liability arising from the August Debenture's conversion
feature and warrants was $511,785 as of December 31, 2010.
F-29
In connection with the issuance of the August Debenture, fees of $135,000,
withheld from the proceeds, were capitalized and are being amortized over the
life of the August Debenture.
Debentures - A&R Forbearance Agreement.
On January 24, 2011, the Company, certain of its subsidiaries listed below, and
YA Global Investments (formerly known as Cornell Capital Partners, LP) ("YA")
finalized an amended and restated forbearance agreement (the "A&R Forbearance
Agreement") and related agreements, which related to certain financing
arrangements and agreements between the Company and YA and its predecessors. The
A&R Forbearance Agreement was dated as of January 7, 2011, but the final
conditions for closing were met on January 24, 2011.
A&R Forbearance Agreement
An overview and summary of the A&R Forbearance Agreement between the Company
("the Obligor") and YA, together with other agreements entered into in
connection with the A&R Forbearance Agreement, follows. The summaries of the
terms and conditions of the A&R Forbearance Agreement and the other agreements
do not purport to be complete, and are qualified in their entirety by reference
to the full text of the agreements which were filed as exhibits to a Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2011.
The A&R Forbearance Agreement related specifically to three debentures issued by
the Company to YA or its predecessor entities: a May 26, 2005, debenture in the
principal amount of $3,750,000 (the "May Debenture"), a December 30, 2005,
debenture in the principal amount of $1,500,000 (the "December Debenture"), and
an August 23, 2006, debenture in the principal amount of $1,500,000 (the "August
Debenture," and collectively with the May Debenture and the December Debentures,
the "Debentures"), together with certain other agreements entered into in
connection with the issuance of the Debentures (collectively, the "Financing
Documents").
The parties to the A&R Forbearance Agreement are the Company; YA; and the
following subsidiaries of the Company: Racore Network, Inc. (hereinafter,
"Racore"); Cirtran - Asia, Inc. (hereinafter, "Asia"); Cirtran Beverage Corp.
(hereinafter, "Beverage"); Cirtran Media Corp. (hereinafter, "Media"); Cirtran
Online Corp. (hereinafter, "Online"); Cirtran Products Corp. (hereinafter,
"Products"); and Cirtran Corporation (Utah) (hereinafter, "Cirtran Sub," and
together with Racore, Asia, Beverage, Media, Online and Products, collectively,
jointly and severally, the "Guarantors"). The A&R Forbearance Agreement
references certain events of default under the Financing Documents, and notes
that the Company and the Guarantors (collectively, the "Obligors") had requested
that YA forbear from enforcing its rights and remedies under the Financing
Documents, and sets for the agreement between the Obligors and YA with respect
to such forbearance.
Specifically, the Obligors agreed to waive any claims against YA, and released
any such claims the Obligors may have had. The Obligors also ratified their
respective obligations under the Financing Documents, and agreed to the
satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including the following: payment
of certain funds to YA at the time of execution of the A&R Forbearance
Agreement; the entry by Iehab Hawatmeh, President of the Company, into a
Guaranty Agreement and a Pledge Agreement (both discussed below); the entry into
a Ratification and Joinder Agreement by the Obligors (discussed below); the
execution of a confession of judgment in a litigation matter between YA, the
Company, and Katana Electronics, LLC ("Katana"); and the delivery of a new
warrant (the "Warrant") to YA (discussed below).
Additionally, the Obligors agreed to seek to obtain waivers from their
respective landlords at their properties in Utah and Arkansas; agreed to seek to
obtain deposit account control agreements from the Company's banks and
depository institutions; and to repay the Company's obligations under the
Debentures on the following schedule:
i. $225,000.00, on or before the date of the A&R Forbearance Agreement
to be applied as follows (x) $75,000.00 in reimbursement of the
legal fees and expenses incurred by the Lender as required by
Paragraph 18, below, and (y) $150,000.00 applied first to accrued
but unpaid interest and then to the principal balance of the
Obligations;
F-30
ii. $75,000.00 on February 1, 2011;
iii. $75,000.00 on March 1, 2011;
iv. $75,000.00 on April 1, 2011;
v. $200,000.00 on May 1, 2011;
vi. $200,000.00 on June 1, 2011;
vii. $200,000.00 on July 1, 2011;
viii. $200,000.00 on August 1, 2011;
ix. $200,000.00 on September 1, 2011;
x. $200,000.00 on October 1, 2011;
xi. $200,000.00 on November 1, 2011;
xii. $200,000.00 on December 1, 2011; and
xiii. the remaining balance of the Obligations shall be paid in full in
good and collected funds by federal funds wire transfer on or before
the earlier of (i) the occurrence of a Termination Event (as defined
in the A&R Forbearance Agreement), or (ii) 3:00 P.M. (prevailing
Eastern time) on December 31, 2011 (the "Termination Date").
We made our required payments through March 1, 2011 as required under the
schedule above. As of the date of this report we had not made the required April
1, 2011, payment.
Pursuant to the A&R Forbearance Agreement, the parties agreed that the Company,
subject to the consent of YA, may choose to pay all or any portion of the
payments listed above in common stock, with the conversion price to be used to
determine the number of shares of common stock being equal to 85% of the lowest
closing bid price of the Company's common stock during the ten trading days
prior to the payment date.
In exchange for the satisfaction of such conditions and agreements from the
Obligors, YA agreed to forbear from enforcing its rights and remedies as a
result of the existing defaults and/or converting the Debentures into shares of
the Company's common stock, until the earlier of (i) the occurrence of a
Termination Event (as defined in the A&R Forbearance Agreement), or (ii) the
Termination Date, which is given as December 31, 2011. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, nothing contained in the A&R Forbearance Agreement or the other
Forbearance Documents will be deemed to constitute a waiver by YA of any default
or event of default, whether now existing or hereafter arising (including,
without limitation, the existing defaults listed in the A&R Forbearance
Agreement), and/or its right to convert the Debentures into shares of the
Company's common stock.
Guaranty Agreement and Pledge Agreement
In connection with the A&R Forbearance Agreement, Mr. Hawatmeh entered into a
Guaranty Agreement and a Pledge Agreement. Pursuant to the Guaranty Agreement,
Mr. Hawatmeh agreed to guarantee to YA the full payment and prompt performance
of all of the obligations in the A&R Forbearance Agreement. Pursuant to the
Pledge Agreement, Mr. Hawatmeh agreed to pledge a first priority security
interest in one-half of his membership units in Play Beverages, LLC ("PlayBev")
to secure the payment of the obligations under the A&R Forbearance Agreement and
the Guaranty Agreement.
Ratification and Joinder to Collateral Agreements
The Company, CirTran Sub, and the other Obligors also entered into a
Ratification and Joinder to Collateral Agreements, pursuant to which CirTran Sub
agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of, and to be a party to, the
Global Security Agreement (entered into in connection with the Prior Forbearance
Agreement) and the Global Guaranty Agreement (entered into in connection with
the Prior Forbearance Agreement). (The terms of the Global Guaranty Agreement
and the Global Security Agreement were described in, and attached as exhibits
to, the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 17,
2009. For a more complete description of these agreements, please see that
filing.)
F-31
NOTE 16 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
For asset and liabilities measured at fair value, the Company uses the following
hierarchy of inputs:
o Level one -- Quoted market prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities;
o Level two -- Inputs other than level one inputs that are either
directly or indirectly observable; and
o Level three -- Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and
assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect
those assumptions that a market participant would use.
Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2010 are
summarized as follows:
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
---------------------------------------------------
Fair value of derivatives $ - $ 1,412,646 $ - $ 1,412,646
Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2009 are
summarized as follows:
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
---------------------------------------------------
Fair value of derivatives $ - $ 523,349 $ - $ 523,349
As further described in Note 2, the fair value of the derivative liability was
determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
NOTE 17 - LEASES
On May 4, 2007, the Company entered into a ten-year lease agreement for the
Company's existing 40,000 square-foot headquarters and manufacturing facility,
located at 4125 South 6000 West in West Valley City, Utah. Monthly payments are
$10,000, adjusted annually in accordance with the Consumer Price Index. The
workspace includes 10,000 square feet of office space to support administration,
sales, and engineering staff. The 30,000 square feet of manufacturing space
includes a secured inventory area, shipping and receiving areas, and
manufacturing and assembly space (see Note 7). On March 5, 2010, the Company
entered into a Sublease Agreement with, Katana Electronics, LLC, a Utah limited
liability company ("Katana"). Katana Electronics, LLC is owned by Shaher
Hawatmeh, former employee and a related party. Pursuant to the terms of the
Sublease, the Company will sublease a certain portion of the Premises to Katana
consisting of the warehouse and office space used as of the close of business on
March 4, 2010. The term of the Sublease is for two (2) months with automatic
renewal periods of one month each, subject to land lord authorization. The base
rent under the Sublease is $8,500 per month. The Sublease contains normal and
customary use restrictions, indemnification rights and obligations, default
provisions and termination rights.
In November 2008, the Company signed a two-year lease with automatic renewal
periods of one month each, subject to land lord authorization on a 1,150
square-foot facility in Bentonville, Arkansas, in close proximity to Wal-Mart's
world headquarters. Lease payments during the two-year lease term have been $715
per month. As the contract period has expired, it is on a month-to-month basis.
This office is used for sales and promotions.
The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments under the operating
leases:
F-32
Year Ending December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------
2011 $ 120,000
2012 120,000
2013 120,000
2014 120,000
2015 120,000
Thereafter 160,000
--------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 760,000
--------------------------------------------------------
The building leases provide for payment of property taxes, insurance, and
maintenance costs by the Company. Rental expense for operating leases totaled
$79,655 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
NOTE 18 - ROYALTY OBLIGATION TO ABS CREDITORS
Under the June 2006 agreement with ABS, which is a part of ABS's bankruptcy
proceedings, the Company has an obligation to pay a royalty equal to $3.00 per
TCP flat iron unit sold by the Company. The maximum amount of royalties the
Company must pay is $4,135,000. Regardless of sales, however, the Company agreed
to pay at least $435,000 by June 2008, and included that amount in the Company's
long-term obligations (see Note 14). The Company is in default on this
agreement. Under the terms of the bankruptcy court-approved agreement, royalties
are to be paid to various ABS creditors in a specified order and in specified
amounts. Only after the Company pays the total $435,000 to other creditors can
it then begin to share pro rata in part of the royalties owed by offsetting
amounts owed to reduce its long-term receivable (see Note 8). In September 2010,
the Company assigned and transferred the assets received from the bankruptcy
court without reservation or exclusion back to the court in satisfaction of the
remaining debt. As of December 31, 2010 the Company has made a total of $331,388
in payments on the long-term note payable and wrote off the remaining balance of
$103,612 as a result of the Company assigning the related assets to the court in
satisfaction of the remaining debt.
NOTE 19 - INCOME TAXES
The Company has paid no federal or state income taxes. The significant
components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31,
2010 and 2009, were as follows:
2010 2009
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deferred income tax assets:
Capital loss carryforward $ 170,645 $ -
Loss on sale of assets 947,179 -
Loss from subdivisions not consolidated
for tax purposes 755,256 -
Inventory reserve 770,453 762,956
Bad debt reserve 302,979 108,470
Vacation reserve 23,666 35,580
Research and development credits - 27,285
Net operating loss carryforward 9,183,719 8,367,617
Depreciation 93,158 121,291
Intellectual property 37,066 415,823
Derivative liability 526,917 195,209
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total deferred income tax assets 12,811,038 10,034,231
Valuation allowance (12,811,038) (10,034,231)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net deferred income tax asset $ - $ -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F-33
The Company has sustained net operating losses in both periods presented in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. No deferred tax asset or
income tax benefits are reflected in the financial statements for net deductible
temporary differences or net operating loss carryforwards, because the
likelihood of realization of the related tax benefits cannot be established.
Accordingly, a valuation allowance has been recorded to reduce the net deferred
tax asset to zero, and consequently there is no income tax provision or benefit
presented for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for
tax reporting purposes of approximately $25.6 million. These net operating loss
carryforwards, if unused, begin to expire in 2020. Utilization of approximately
$1.2 million of the total net operating loss is dependent on the future
profitable operation of Racore Technology Corporation, a wholly-owned
subsidiary, under the separate return limitation rules and restrictions on
utilizing net operating loss carryforwards after a change in ownership. In
addition, the realization of tax benefits relating to net operating loss
carryforwards is limited due to the settlement related to amounts previously due
to the IRS, as discussed below.
In November 2004, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") accepted the Company's
Amended Offer in Compromise (the "Offer") to settle delinquent payroll taxes,
interest and penalties. The acceptance of the Offer required the Company to pay
$500,000. Additionally, the Offer required the Company to remain current in its
payment of taxes for 5 years, and not claim any net operating losses for the
years 2001 through 2015, or until the Company pays taxes on future profits in an
amount equal to the taxes waived by the offer in compromise of $1,455,767. The
Company has defaulted on the original agreement and is currently working with
the IRS to pay of the 2009 tax liabilities. The Company is current on payments
as of April 15, 2011.
The following is a reconciliation of the amount of tax benefit that would result
from applying the federal statutory rate to pretax loss with the benefit from
income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:
2010 2009
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefit at statutory rate (34%) $ (1,684,577) $ (1,976,982)
Non-deductible expenses 63,636 41,312
Change in valuation allowance 2,776,807 1,704,717
State tax benefit, net of federal tax benefit (163,503) (191,884)
Return to provision (992,363) 422,837
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net benefit from income taxes $ - $ -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 20 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock Issuances -- During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company
did not issue shares of common stock:
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued the following shares
of restricted common stock:
72,710,337 restricted shares of common stock to Highgate and YA Global
upon conversion of $117,622 of convertible debt and accrued interest and
an $81,833 effect of derivative conversion. On each conversion date, the
conversion rate was the lower of $0.10 per share, or 100 percent of the
lowest closing bid price of our common stock over the 20 trading days
preceding the conversion. The average conversion rate was $.002 during
2009.
F-34
NOTE 21 - STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
Stock Option Plans - As of December 31, 2010, options to purchase a total of
59,200,000 shares of common stock had been issued from the 2006 Stock Option
Plan, out of which a maximum of 60,000,000 can be issued. As of December 31,
2010, options and share purchase rights to acquire a total of 22,960,000 shares
of common stock had been issued from the 2008 Stock Option Plan, also, out of
which a maximum of 60,000,000 can be issued. The Company's Board of Directors
administers the plans, and has discretion in determining the employees,
directors, independent contractors, and advisors who receive awards, the type of
awards (stock, incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, or share
purchase rights) granted, and the term, vesting, and exercise prices.
Employee Options - During the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company
did not grant options to purchase shares of common stock to employees.
During 2010, the Company accrued for 49,200,000 employee options relating to the
employment contract of the Company president, directors and officers. The fair
market value of the options accrued aggregated $370,797, using the following
assumptions: 5 year term, volatility of between 132.01 and 148.71 percent and a
discount rate of between 1.72 and 3.28 percent.
A summary of the stock option activity under the Plans as of December 31, 2010,
and changes during the year then ended is presented below:
Weighted-
Weighted- Average
Average Remaining Aggregate
Exercise Contractual Intrinsic
Shares Price Life Value
---------------------------------------------------
Outstanding at December 31,
2008 56,160,000 $ 0.014 3.51 $ -
Granted - $ 0.000
Exercised - $ 0.000
Expired (3,000,000) $ 0.014
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding at December 31,
2009 53,160,000 $ 0.014 2.48 $ -
Granted - $ 0.000
Exercised - $ 0.000
Expired (12,360,000) $ 0.013
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding at December 31,
2010 40,800,000 $ 0.015 1.45 $ -
Exercisable at December 31,
2010 40,200,000 $ 0.014 1.46 $ -
The expense for options that vested in 2010 and 2009 was $3,986 and $3,986,
respectively, as of December 31, 2010 unrecognized compensation costs related to
options outstanding that have not yet vested at year-end that would be
recognized in subsequent periods totaled $2,989.
Warrants - In connection with the YA Global convertible debenture issued in
August 2006, the Company issued three-year warrants to purchase 15,000,000
shares of the Company's common stock. The initial expiration date of the
warrants was August 23, 2009. As part of the Forbearance Agreement (see Note
13), the life of the warrants was extended one year to August 23, 2010. The
warrants had an exercise price of $0.06 per share, and vested immediately.
Subsequent to year end, the Company issued additional warrants under the A&R
Forbearance Agreement (see note 24).
In connection with the private placement with ANAHOP, the Company issued
five-year warrants to purchase 30,000,000 shares of common stock at prices
ranging from $0.15 to $0.50. All of these warrants were subject to adjustment in
the event of a stock split. Accordingly, as a result of the 1:1.20 forward stock
split that occurred in 2007, there are warrants outstanding at December 31,
2010, to purchase a total of 36,000,000 shares of common stock in connection
with these transactions. The exercise price per share of each of the
aforementioned warrants was likewise affected by the stock split, in that each
price was reduced by 20 percent.
F-35
The Corporation currently has an insufficient number of authorized shares to
enable warrant holders to fully exercise their warrants, assuming all warrants
holders desired to do so. Accordingly, the warrants are subject to derivative
accounting treatment, and are included in the derivative liability related to
the convertible debentures (see Notes 14 and 15).
NOTE 22 -SEGMENT INFORMATION
Segment information has been prepared in accordance with ASC 280-10, Disclosure
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. The Company has four
reportable segments: Electronics Assembly, Contract Manufacturing, Marketing and
Media, and Beverage Distribution. The Electronics Assembly segment manufactures
and assembles circuit boards and electronic component cables. The Contract
Manufacturing segment manufactures, either directly or through foreign
subcontractors, various products under manufacturing and distribution
agreements. The Marketing and Media segment provides marketing services to
online retailers, along with beverage development and promotional services to
Play Beverages, LLC. The Beverage Distribution segment manufactures, markets,
and distributes Playboy-licensed energy drinks domestically and internationally.
The Beverage Distribution segment continues to grow, and the distribution
channels, across the country and internationally, continues to gain traction.
The Company anticipates this segment to become more significant in relation to
overall Company operations.
The accounting policies of the segments are consistent with those described in
the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates
performance of each segment based on earnings or loss from operations. Selected
segment information is as follows:
Electronics Contract Marketing Beverage
Assembly Manufacturing and Media Distribution Total
December 31, 2010
Sales to external customers $ 170,444 $ 66,880 $ 1,095,086 $ 7,712,492 $ 9,044,902
Segment income (loss) (3,214,109) (75,290) (413,154) (1,252,085) (4,954,638)
Segment assets 1,724,896 800,314 347,643 1,323,047 4,195,900
Depreciation and amortization 372,840 257,410 23,365 - 653,615
December 31, 2009
Sales to external customers $ 1,263,355 $ 334,762 $ 6,350,710 $ 1,784,028 $ 9,732,855
Segment income (loss) (3,282,578) (477,987) (1,633,455) (420,633) (5,814,653)
Segment assets 3,043,152 1,277,804 8,661,801 658,464 13,641,221
Depreciation and amortization 379,493 258,030 23,417 - 660,940
NOTE 23 - GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The Company currently maintains $240,497 of capitalized tooling costs in China.
All other revenue-producing assets are located in the United States of America.
Revenues are attributed to the geographic areas based on the location of the
customers purchasing the products. The Company's net sales and assets by
geographic area are as follows:
Revenues Revenue-producing assets
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2010 2009 2010 2009
--------------------------------------------------------------
United States
of America $ 2,061,893 $ 8,483,572 $ 95,050 $ 135,861
China - - 240,497 408,844
Hungary 1,468,400 - - -
Russia 964,800 - - -
Nigeria 1,476,003 - - -
Other 3,073,806 1,249,283 - -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 9,044,902 $ 9,732,855 $ 335,547 $ 544,705
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F-36
NOTE 24 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Amended and Restated Forbearance Agreement
On January 24, 2011, the Company, and YA Global Investments (formerly known as
Cornell Capital Partners, LP) ("YA") finalized an amended and restated
forbearance agreement (the "A&R Forbearance Agreement") and related agreements,
which related to certain financing arrangements and agreements between the
Company and YA and its predecessors (see Note 9). The A&R Forbearance Agreement
was dated as of January 7, 2011, but the final conditions for closing were met
on January 24, 2011 (see note 15).
ABS Litigation
In connection with prior litigation between Advanced Beauty Solutions ("ABS")
and the Company, ABS claimed non-performance by the Company and filed an
adversary proceeding in ABS's bankruptcy case proceeding in the United States
Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California, San Fernando Valley Division.
On March 17, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court entered judgment in favor of ABS and
against the Company in the amount of $1,811,667 plus interest. On September 11,
2009, the Bankruptcy Court denied the Company's motion to set aside the
judgment. As of the date of this report, ABS is pursuing collection efforts on
this judgment. On September 8, 2010, the Company executed an Assignment of
Copyrights, thereby assigning the Company's copyright Registration No.
TX-6-064-955, Copyright Registration No. TX-6-064-956, and Copyright to the True
Ceramic Pro - Live Ops (TCPS) infomercial and related master tapes (collectively
the "Copyrights") to ABS. The Company assigned and transferred the Copyrights
without reservation or exclusion, making ABS the owner of the Copyrights. On
February 23, 2011, the Company filed a Motion to Declare Judgment Fully
Satisfied or Alternatively to Recoup Mutual Debts, requesting that the Court
determine that the Company's assignment of the Copyrights resulted in full
satisfaction of the ABS judgment.
On April 6, 2011, the Court held a hearing on (1) the Company's Motion to
Declare Judgment Fully Satisfied or Alternatively to Recoup Mutual Debts; and
(2) ABS's Motion for an Order to Show Cause re Civil Contempt. The Court denied
the Company's Motion to declare the judgment fully satisfied, and did not hold
the Company in civil contempt, but issued the Order to Show Cause and scheduled
an evidentiary hearing on the issue of contempt for July 8, 2011. As of the date
of this Report, the Company was reviewing its options with respect to how to
proceed.
F-37
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------