UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) |
||
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
OR |
||
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period from to . |
Commission File Number: 1-9044
DUKE REALTY CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Indiana |
|
35-1740409 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction |
|
(IRS Employer |
of Incorporation or Organization) |
|
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
600 East 96th Street, Suite 100 |
|
|
Indianapolis, Indiana |
|
46240 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (317) 808-6000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
|
Yes |
x |
|
No |
o |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
|
Yes |
o |
|
No |
x |
|
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Class |
|
Outstanding at May 1, 2008 |
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share |
|
146,686,438 shares |
DUKE REALTY CORPORATION
INDEX
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
||
|
|
26 |
||
|
|
27 |
||
|
|
27 |
||
|
|
27 |
||
|
|
27 |
||
|
|
28-29 |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
DUKE REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real estate investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
938,764 |
|
$ |
872,372 |
|
Buildings and tenant improvements |
|
4,849,556 |
|
4,600,408 |
|
||
Construction in progress |
|
444,691 |
|
412,729 |
|
||
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated companies |
|
665,572 |
|
601,801 |
|
||
Land held for development |
|
836,245 |
|
912,448 |
|
||
|
|
7,734,828 |
|
7,399,758 |
|
||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
(1,029,862 |
) |
(951,375 |
) |
||
Net real estate investments |
|
6,704,966 |
|
6,448,383 |
|
||
Real estate investments and other assets held for sale |
|
144,077 |
|
273,591 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
15,529 |
|
48,012 |
|
||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,812 and $1,359 |
|
26,672 |
|
29,009 |
|
||
Straight-line rent receivable, net of allowance of $2,095 and $2,886 |
|
116,682 |
|
110,737 |
|
||
Receivables on construction contracts, including retentions |
|
70,684 |
|
66,925 |
|
||
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $30,337 and $29,170 |
|
53,480 |
|
55,987 |
|
||
Deferred leasing and other costs, net of accumulated amortization of $163,576 and $150,702 |
|
377,253 |
|
374,635 |
|
||
Escrow deposits and other assets |
|
250,900 |
|
254,702 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
7,760,243 |
|
$ |
7,661,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Indebtedness: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Secured debt |
|
$ |
506,071 |
|
$ |
524,393 |
|
Unsecured notes |
|
3,121,000 |
|
3,246,000 |
|
||
Unsecured lines of credit |
|
635,068 |
|
546,067 |
|
||
|
|
4,262,139 |
|
4,316,460 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities of properties held for sale |
|
3,813 |
|
8,954 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Construction payables and amounts due subcontractors, including retentions |
|
129,631 |
|
142,655 |
|
||
Accrued expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real estate taxes |
|
72,559 |
|
63,796 |
|
||
Interest |
|
38,490 |
|
54,631 |
|
||
Other |
|
31,283 |
|
59,221 |
|
||
Other liabilities |
|
127,971 |
|
148,013 |
|
||
Tenant security deposits and prepaid rents |
|
38,085 |
|
34,535 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
4,703,971 |
|
4,828,265 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Minority interest |
|
76,619 |
|
83,683 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred shares ($.01 par value); 5,000 shares authorized; 4,176 and 2,976 shares issued and outstanding |
|
1,044,000 |
|
744,000 |
|
||
Common shares ($.01 par value); 250,000 shares authorized; 146,670 and 146,175 shares issued and outstanding |
|
1,467 |
|
1,462 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
2,637,099 |
|
2,632,615 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
(9,719 |
) |
(1,279 |
) |
||
Distributions in excess of net income |
|
(693,194 |
) |
(626,765 |
) |
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
2,979,653 |
|
2,750,033 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
7,760,243 |
|
$ |
7,661,981 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
DUKE REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
RENTAL OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rental revenue from continuing operations |
|
$ |
217,802 |
|
$ |
202,105 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated companies |
|
10,099 |
|
7,691 |
|
||
|
|
227,901 |
|
209,796 |
|
||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rental expenses |
|
52,027 |
|
49,049 |
|
||
Real estate taxes |
|
27,544 |
|
25,043 |
|
||
Interest expense |
|
47,534 |
|
44,408 |
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
78,713 |
|
66,375 |
|
||
|
|
205,818 |
|
184,875 |
|
||
Earnings from continuing rental operations |
|
22,083 |
|
24,921 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
SERVICE OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
General contractor gross revenue |
|
76,759 |
|
54,157 |
|
||
General contractor costs |
|
(70,104 |
) |
(48,688 |
) |
||
Net general contractor revenue |
|
6,655 |
|
5,469 |
|
||
Service fee revenue |
|
7,524 |
|
6,397 |
|
||
Gain on sale of service operations properties |
|
597 |
|
2,864 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total service operations revenue |
|
14,776 |
|
14,730 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating expenses |
|
10,363 |
|
7,796 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings from service operations |
|
4,413 |
|
6,934 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
General and administrative expense |
|
(12,162 |
) |
(13,460 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating income |
|
14,334 |
|
18,395 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest and other income, net |
|
3,725 |
|
2,403 |
|
||
Earnings from sale of land, net |
|
629 |
|
13,997 |
|
||
Minority interest in earnings of common unitholders |
|
(214 |
) |
(1,331 |
) |
||
Income from continuing operations |
|
18,474 |
|
33,464 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of minority interest |
|
(173 |
) |
2,039 |
|
||
Gain on sale of depreciable property, net of minority interest |
|
1,053 |
|
48,286 |
|
||
Income from discontinued operations |
|
880 |
|
50,325 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
19,354 |
|
83,789 |
|
||
Dividends on preferred shares |
|
(15,306 |
) |
(15,226 |
) |
||
Net income available for common shareholders |
|
$ |
4,048 |
|
$ |
68,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
.02 |
|
$ |
.13 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
.01 |
|
.37 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
.03 |
|
$ |
.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
.02 |
|
$ |
.13 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
.01 |
|
.36 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
.03 |
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
146,331 |
|
136,823 |
|
||
Weighted average number of common shares and potential dilutive securities |
|
154,596 |
|
149,465 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
DUKE REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the three months ended March 31,
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
19,354 |
|
$ |
83,789 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation of buildings and tenant improvements |
|
60,850 |
|
52,143 |
|
||
Amortization of deferred leasing and other costs |
|
18,271 |
|
15,596 |
|
||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
3,399 |
|
2,865 |
|
||
Minority interest in earnings |
|
261 |
|
4,910 |
|
||
Straight-line rent adjustment |
|
(4,638 |
) |
(5,773 |
) |
||
Earnings from land and depreciated property sales |
|
(1,739 |
) |
(65,717 |
) |
||
Build-for-sale operations, net |
|
(41,775 |
) |
(49,989 |
) |
||
Construction contracts, net |
|
(14,418 |
) |
6,764 |
|
||
Other accrued revenues and expenses, net |
|
(35,300 |
) |
(32,590 |
) |
||
Operating distributions received in excess of (less than) equity in earnings from unconsolidated companies |
|
(2,042 |
) |
137 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
2,223 |
|
12,135 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Development of real estate investments |
|
(151,872 |
) |
(96,588 |
) |
||
Acquisition of real estate investments and related intangible assets |
|
(8,701 |
) |
(33,628 |
) |
||
Acquisition of land held for development |
|
(14,741 |
) |
(34,738 |
) |
||
Recurring tenant improvements |
|
(10,803 |
) |
(10,333 |
) |
||
Recurring leasing costs |
|
(6,098 |
) |
(7,732 |
) |
||
Recurring building improvements |
|
(967 |
) |
(974 |
) |
||
Other deferred leasing costs |
|
(5,939 |
) |
(3,664 |
) |
||
Other deferred costs and other assets |
|
(298 |
) |
(1,053 |
) |
||
Proceeds from land and depreciated property sales, net |
|
26,684 |
|
176,726 |
|
||
Capital distributions from unconsolidated companies |
|
38,753 |
|
53,500 |
|
||
Capital contributions and advances to unconsolidated companies, net |
|
(20,296 |
) |
(33,140 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities |
|
(154,278 |
) |
8,376 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from issuance of common shares |
|
5,801 |
|
|
|
||
Proceeds (disbursements) from exercise of stock options |
|
112 |
|
(12 |
) |
||
Proceeds from issuance of preferred shares, net |
|
290,445 |
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from unsecured debt issuance |
|
|
|
5,812 |
|
||
Payments on unsecured debt |
|
(125,000 |
) |
|
|
||
Payments on secured indebtedness including principal amortization |
|
(36,532 |
) |
(12,007 |
) |
||
Borrowings on lines of credit, net |
|
89,001 |
|
13,000 |
|
||
Distributions to common shareholders |
|
(70,211 |
) |
(65,004 |
) |
||
Distributions to preferred shareholders |
|
(15,306 |
) |
(15,226 |
) |
||
Distributions to minority interest, net |
|
(3,828 |
) |
(4,662 |
) |
||
Cash settlement of interest rate swaps |
|
(14,625 |
) |
|
|
||
Deferred financing costs |
|
(285 |
) |
(1,403 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
119,572 |
|
(79,502 |
) |
||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(32,483 |
) |
(58,991 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
48,012 |
|
68,483 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
15,529 |
|
$ |
9,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Conversion of Limited Partner Units to common shares |
|
$ |
4,376 |
|
$ |
117,245 |
|
Issuance of Limited Partner Units for acquisition |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
11,020 |
|
Assumption of secured debt for real estate acquisitions |
|
$ |
18,465 |
|
$ |
|
|
Contribution of property to unconsolidated company |
|
$ |
77,158 |
|
$ |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
DUKE REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity
For the three months ended March 31, 2008
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
Other |
|
Distributions |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Preferred |
|
Common |
|
Paid-in |
|
Comprehensive |
|
in Excess of |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Shares |
|
Capital |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Net Income |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
744,000 |
|
$ |
1,462 |
|
$ |
2,632,615 |
|
$ |
(1,279 |
) |
$ |
(626,765 |
) |
$ |
2,750,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,354 |
|
19,354 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Losses on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,440 |
) |
|
|
(8,440 |
) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,914 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Issuance of preferred shares |
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
290,000 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Issuance of common shares |
|
|
|
2 |
|
5,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,801 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Stock based compensation plan activity |
|
|
|
1 |
|
4,311 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
4,046 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Acquisition of minority interest |
|
|
|
2 |
|
4,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,376 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,306 |
) |
(15,306 |
) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Distributions to common shareholders ($.48 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,211 |
) |
(70,211 |
) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,044,000 |
|
$ |
1,467 |
|
$ |
2,637,099 |
|
$ |
(9,719 |
) |
$ |
(693,194 |
) |
$ |
2,979,653 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
DUKE REALTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. General Basis of Presentation
The interim consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Duke Realty Corporation (the Company) without audit. The 2007 year-end consolidated balance sheet data included in this Form 10-Q was derived from the audited financial statements referenced above, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Our actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included herein and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
We believe we qualify as a real estate investment trust (REIT) under the provisions of the internal revenue code. Substantially all of our Rental Operations (see Note 7) are conducted through Duke Realty Limited Partnership (DRLP). We owned approximately 95.0% of the common partnership interests of DRLP (Units) at March 31, 2008. The remaining Units are redeemable for shares of our common stock on a one-to-one basis and earn dividends at the same rates as shares of our common stock. We conduct our Service Operations (see Note 7) through Duke Realty Services LLC, Duke Realty Services Limited Partnership and Duke Construction Limited Partnership. The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and our majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries. In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this Report), unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms we, us and our refer to the Company and those entities owned or controlled by the Company.
2. New Accounting Pronouncement
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No.157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) was effective for us on January 1, 2008. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies to reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured at fair value under existing accounting pronouncements; accordingly, the standard does not require any new fair value measurements of reported balances. Based on the guidance provided by FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP No. 157-2), we have only partially implemented the guidance promulgated under SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008, which in our circumstances only affects financial instruments. SFAS 157 will not be applied during 2008 to nonfinancial long lived asset groups that may be measured for an impairment assessment, reporting units measured at fair value in the first step of the goodwill impairment test, and nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination. We will fully apply the provisions of SFAS 157 beginning January 1, 2009 and do not expect there to be a material impact to the financial statements.
6
SFAS 157 emphasized that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entitys own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities to which we have access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entitys own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
3. Reclassifications
Certain 2007 balances have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation.
4. Indebtedness
Our unsecured lines of credit as of March 31, 2008 are described as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Borrowing |
|
Maturity |
|
Outstanding Balance |
|
||
Description |
|
Capacity |
|
Date |
|
at March 31, 2008 |
|
||
Unsecured Line of Credit - DRLP |
|
$ |
1,300,000 |
|
January 2010 |
|
$ |
631,000 |
|
Unsecured Line of Credit - Consolidated Subsidiary |
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
July 2011 |
|
$ |
4,068 |
|
We use the DRLP unsecured line of credit to fund development activities, acquire additional rental properties and provide working capital. This line of credit provides us with an option to obtain borrowings from financial institutions that participate in the line, at rates that may be lower than the stated interest rate, subject to certain restrictions. Interest rates on the amounts outstanding on the unsecured line of credit as of March 31, 2008 ranged from LIBOR plus .45% to LIBOR plus .525% (ranging from 3.135% to 3.61% as of March 31, 2008). Our line of credit also contains financial covenants that require us to meet financial ratios and defined levels of performance, including those related to variable rate indebtedness, consolidated net worth and debt-to-market capitalization. As of March 31, 2008, we were in compliance with all covenants under this line of credit.
The consolidated subsidiarys unsecured line of credit allows for borrowings up to $30.0 million at a rate of LIBOR plus .85% (equal to 3.456% for outstanding borrowings as of March 31, 2008). The unsecured line of credit is used to fund development activities within the consolidated subsidiary. The consolidated subsidiarys unsecured line of credit matures in July 2011 with a 12-month extension option.
In January 2008, we repaid $125.0 million of senior unsecured notes with an effective interest rate of 3.36% on their scheduled maturity date.
7
5. Related Party Transactions
We provide property management, leasing, construction and other tenant related services to unconsolidated companies in which we have equity interests. For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, we earned from these companies management fees of $1.6 million and $1.3 million, leasing fees of $657,000 and $505,000 and construction and development fees of $2.8 million and $3.6 million. We recorded these fees based on contractual terms that approximate market rates for these types of services and we have eliminated our ownership percentage of these fees in the consolidated financial statements.
6. Net Income Per Common Share
Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available for common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing the sum of net income available for common shareholders and the minority interest in earnings allocable to Units not owned by us, by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and minority Units outstanding, including any potential dilutive securities for the period.
The following table reconciles the components of basic and diluted net income per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
Basic net income available for common shareholders |
|
$ |
4,048 |
|
$ |
68,563 |
|
Joint venture partner convertible ownership net income (1) |
|
|
|
452 |
|
||
Minority interest in earnings of common unitholders |
|
220 |
|
4,910 |
|
||
Diluted net income available for common shareholders |
|
$ |
4,268 |
|
$ |
73,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
146,331 |
|
136,823 |
|
||
Weighted average partnership Units outstanding |
|
7,858 |
|
9,729 |
|
||
Joint venture partner convertible ownership interest (1) |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
||
Dilutive shares for stock-based compensation plans (2) |
|
407 |
|
1,775 |
|
||
Weighted average number of common shares and potential dilutive securities |
|
154,596 |
|
149,465 |
|
(1) One of our joint venture partners in one of our unconsolidated companies has the option to convert a portion of its ownership in the joint venture to our common shares. The effect of this option on earnings per share was dilutive for the first quarter of 2007; therefore, conversion to common shares is included in weighted average potential dilutive securities for that quarter. This option was anti-dilutive for the first quarter of 2008.
(2) Excludes (in thousands of shares) 6,575 and 420 of anti-dilutive shares as of March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Also excludes the Exchangeable Senior Notes (Exchangeable Notes) issued in 2006, that have an anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
7. Segment Reporting
We are engaged in three reportable operating segments, the first two of which consist of the ownership and rental of office and industrial real estate investments. The operations of our office and industrial properties, along with our healthcare properties (our healthcare properties, and other property types which are not significant, are not separately presented as a reportable segment), are collectively referred to as Rental Operations. The third reportable segment consists of our build for sale operations and providing various real estate services such as property management, maintenance, leasing, development and construction management to third-party property owners and joint ventures (and is collectively referred to as Service Operations). Our reportable segments offer different products or services and are managed separately because each segment requires different operating strategies and management expertise.
8
During the period between the completion of development, rehabilitation or repositioning of a Service Operations property and the date the property is contributed to a property fund or sold to a third party, the property and its associated rental revenues and rental expenses are included in the applicable Rental Operations segment because the primary activity associated with the Service Operations property during that period is rental activities. Upon contribution or sale, the resulting gain or loss is part of the income of the Service Operations business segment.
Other revenue consists mainly of equity in earnings of unconsolidated companies. Segment FFO information (FFO is defined below) is calculated by subtracting operating expenses attributable to the applicable segment from segment revenues. Non-segment assets consist of corporate assets including cash, deferred financing costs and investments in unconsolidated companies. Interest expense and other non-property specific revenues and expenses are not allocated to individual segments in determining our performance measure.
We assess and measure segment operating results based upon an industry performance measure referred to as Funds From Operations (FFO), which management believes is a useful indicator of our operating performance. FFO is used by industry analysts and investors as a supplemental operating performance measure of a REIT like Duke. FFO is calculated in accordance with the definition that was adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT). NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of REIT operating performance that excludes historical cost depreciation, among other items, from net income determined in accordance with GAAP. FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure developed by NAREIT to compare the operating performance of REITs. The most comparable GAAP measure is net income (loss). FFO should not be considered as a substitute for net income or any other measures derived in accordance with GAAP and may not be comparable to other similarly titled measure of other companies.
Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry analysts and investors have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. FFO, as defined by NAREIT, represents GAAP net income (loss), excluding extraordinary items as defined under GAAP and gains or losses from sales of previously depreciated real estate assets, plus certain non-cash items such as real estate asset depreciation and amortization, and after similar adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
Management believes that the use of FFO, combined with the required primary GAAP presentations, improves the understanding of operating results of REITs among the investing public and makes comparisons of REIT operating results more meaningful. Management believes FFO is a useful measure for reviewing comparative operating and financial performance (although FFO should be reviewed in conjunction with net income which remains the primary measure of performance) because by excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously depreciated real estate assets and excluding real estate asset depreciation and amortization, FFO provides a useful comparison of the operating performance of our real estate between periods or as compared to different companies.
9
The following table shows (i) the revenues and FFO for each of the reportable segments and (ii) a reconciliation of net income available for common shareholders to the calculation of FFO for the three months ended March 31, 2008, and 2007, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rental Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Office |
|
$ |
148,245 |
|
$ |
143,826 |
|
Industrial |
|
61,316 |
|
54,214 |
|
||
Non-reportable Rental Operations segments |
|
6,229 |
|
1,838 |
|
||
Service Operations |
|
14,776 |
|
14,730 |
|
||
Total Segment Revenues |
|
230,566 |
|
214,608 |
|
||
Other Revenue |
|
12,111 |
|
9,918 |
|
||
Consolidated Revenue from continuing operations |
|
242,677 |
|
224,526 |
|
||
Discontinued Operations |
|
974 |
|
11,087 |
|
||
Consolidated Revenue |
|
$ |
243,651 |
|
$ |
235,613 |
|
Funds From Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rental Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Office |
|
$ |
89,833 |
|
$ |
86,100 |
|
Industrial |
|
45,392 |
|
40,667 |
|
||
Non-reportable Rental Operations segments |
|
3,683 |
|
1,353 |
|
||
Service Operations |
|
4,413 |
|
6,934 |
|
||
Total Segment FFO |
|
143,321 |
|
135,054 |
|
||
Non-Segment FFO: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense |
|
(47,534 |
) |
(44,408 |
) |
||
Interest and other income, net |
|
3,725 |
|
2,403 |
|
||
General and administrative expense |
|
(12,162 |
) |
(13,460 |
) |
||
Gain on land sales, net |
|
629 |
|
13,997 |
|
||
Other non-segment income (expense) |
|
(677 |
) |
(106 |
) |
||
Minority interest |
|
(214 |
) |
(1,331 |
) |
||
Minority interest share of FFO adjustments |
|
(4,326 |
) |
(1,263 |
) |
||
Joint venture FFO |
|
17,008 |
|
10,698 |
|
||
Dividends on preferred shares |
|
(15,306 |
) |
(15,226 |
) |
||
Discontinued operations, net of minority interest |
|
178 |
|
(31 |
) |
||
Consolidated basic FFO |
|
84,642 |
|
86,327 |
|
||
Depreciation and amortization on continuing operations |
|
(78,713 |
) |
(66,375 |
) |
||
Depreciation and amortization on discontinued operations |
|
(408 |
) |
(1,364 |
) |
||
Companys share of joint venture adjustments |
|
(6,928 |
) |
(4,968 |
) |
||
Earnings from depreciated property sales on discontinued operations |
|
1,110 |
|
51,720 |
|
||
Earnings from depreciated property sales share of joint venture |
|
19 |
|
1,960 |
|
||
Minority interest share of FFO adjustments |
|
4,326 |
|
1,263 |
|
||
Net income available for common shareholders |
|
$ |
4,048 |
|
$ |
68,563 |
|
8. Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale
The operations of 34 buildings are currently classified as discontinued operations for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007. These 34 buildings consist of 17 industrial and 17 office properties. Of these properties, one was sold during the first quarter of 2008, 32 were sold during 2007 and one operating property is classified as held-for-sale at March 31, 2008.
10
The following table illustrates the operations of the buildings reflected in discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Revenues |
|
$ |
974 |
|
$ |
11,087 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating |
|
441 |
|
4,718 |
|
||
Interest |
|
307 |
|
2,810 |
|
||
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
408 |
|
1,364 |
|
||
General and Administrative |
|
1 |
|
11 |
|
||
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
(183 |
) |
2,184 |
|
||
Minority interest expense |
|
10 |
|
(145 |
) |
||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, before gain on sales |
|
(173 |
) |
2,039 |
|
||
Gain on sale of property |
|
1,110 |
|
51,720 |
|
||
Minority interest expense gain on sales |
|
(57 |
) |
(3,434 |
) |
||
Gain on sale of property, net of minority interest |
|
1,053 |
|
48,286 |
|
||
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
880 |
|
$ |
50,325 |
|
At March 31, 2008, we classified one property as held-for-sale and included in discontinued operations. Additionally, we have classified seven in-service properties as held-for-sale, but have included the results of operations of these properties in continuing operations. The following table illustrates the aggregate balance sheet information of the aforementioned property included in discontinued operations, as well as the seven held-for-sale properties whose results are included in continuing operations, at March 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
Property |
|
Properties |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Included in |
|
Included in |
|
Total |
|
|||
|
|
Discontinued |
|
Continuing |
|
Held-for-Sale |
|
|||
|
|
Operations |
|
Operations |
|
Properties |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Real estate investments, net |
|
$ |
11,693 |
|
$ |
122,344 |
|
$ |
134,037 |
|
Other assets |
|
1,287 |
|
8,753 |
|
10,040 |
|
|||
Total assets held-for-sale |
|
$ |
12,980 |
|
$ |
131,097 |
|
$ |
144,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Accrued expenses |
|
$ |
462 |
|
$ |
577 |
|
$ |
1,039 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
2,774 |
|
2,774 |
|
|||
Total liabilities held-for-sale |
|
$ |
462 |
|
$ |
3,351 |
|
$ |
3,813 |
|
We had entered into a preliminary agreement to sell a portfolio of 14 buildings in our Cleveland Office market and had accordingly ceased depreciation on those buildings in July 2007, as they met the criteria for held for sale accounting. As a result, we had also included the 14 buildings in discontinued operations. However, due to the potential buyer not being able to secure financing on acceptable terms, the sale agreement was cancelled and we have determined that this portfolio no longer meets the criteria for held for sale classification. As the result of this determination, the portfolio was reclassified from discontinued to continuing operations in the first quarter of 2008, resulting in an additional $5.3 million of depreciation expense.
11
We allocate interest expense to discontinued operations and have included such interest expense in computing income from discontinued operations. Interest expense allocable to discontinued operations includes interest on any secured debt on properties included in discontinued operations and an allocable share of our consolidated unsecured interest expense for unencumbered properties. The allocation of unsecured interest expense to discontinued operations was based upon the gross book value of the unencumbered real estate assets included in discontinued operations as it related to the total gross book value of our unencumbered real estate assets.
9. Shareholders Equity
We periodically access the public equity markets to fund the development and acquisition of additional rental properties or to pay down debt. The proceeds of these offerings are contributed to DRLP in exchange for an additional interest in DRLP. In February 2008, we issued $300.0 million of 8.375% Series O Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares from which the net proceeds were used to reduce the outstanding balance on DRLPs unsecured line of credit. The Series O Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares have no stated maturity date although they may be redeemed, at our option, in February 2013.
10. Financial Instruments
We are exposed to capital market risk, such as changes in interest rates. In order to manage the volatility relating to interest rate risk, we may enter into interest rate hedging arrangements from time to time. We do not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.
To comply with the provisions of SFAS 157, to the extent it has been adopted for the period ending March 31, 2008 (see Note 2), we incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.
Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties. However, as of March 31, 2008, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuations of our derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, we have determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. We do not have any fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of March 31, 2008.
12
In November 2007, we entered into forward-starting interest rate swaps with notional amounts appropriate to hedge interest rates on $300.0 million of anticipated debt offerings in 2008. The forward-starting swaps were appropriately designated and tested for effectiveness as cash flow hedges. In March 2008, we settled the forward-starting swaps and made a cash payment of $14.6 million to the counterparties. An effectiveness test was performed as of the settlement date and it was concluded that a highly effective cash flow hedge is still in place for the expected debt offering. Of the amount paid in settlement, approximately $700,000 was immediately reclassified to interest expense, as the result of partial ineffectiveness calculated at the settlement date, while $13.9 million remains in Other Comprehensive income (OCI) and will be recognized through interest expense over the life of the hedged debt offering, which took place in May 2008 (Note 12).
In August 2005, we entered into forward-starting interest rate swaps with notional amounts appropriate to hedge interest rates on $300.0 million of anticipated debt offerings in 2007. The forward-starting swaps were appropriately designated and tested for effectiveness as cash flow hedges. In conjunction with the September 2007 issuance of $300.0 million of senior unsecured notes, we terminated these cash flow hedges as designated. The settlement amount received of $10.7 million is being recognized to earnings through a reduction of interest expense over the term of the hedged cash flows. The ineffective portion of the hedge was insignificant.
The effectiveness of our hedges is evaluated throughout their lives using the hypothetical derivative method under which the change in fair value of the actual swap designated as the hedging instrument is compared to the change in fair value of a hypothetical swap.
11. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations (SFAS 141R) and SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment to ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). SFAS 141R and SFAS 160 require most identifiable assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests and goodwill acquired in a business combination to be recorded at full fair value and require noncontrolling interests (previously referred to as minority interests) to be reported as a component of equity, which changes the accounting for transactions with noncontrolling interest holders. Both Statements are effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and earlier adoption is prohibited. SFAS 141R will be applied to business combinations after the effective date. SFAS 160 will be applied prospectively to all noncontrolling interests, including any that arose before the effective date. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 141R and SFAS 160 on our results of operations and financial position.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures for derivative instruments and hedging activities, specifically in regard to the purpose of the derivative and how the derivative and hedging activities affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 and early application is allowed. We will apply SFAS 161 beginning in 2009.
13
12. Subsequent Events
Declaration of Dividends
The Companys board of directors declared the following dividends at its April 30, 2008, regularly scheduled board meeting:
|
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class |
|
Amount/Share |
|
Record Date |
|
Payment Date |
|
|
Common |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
May 14, 2008 |
|
May 30, 2008 |
|
Preferred (per depositary share): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series J |
|
$ |
0.414063 |
|
May 16, 2008 |
|
May 30, 2008 |
|
Series K |
|
$ |
0.406250 |
|
May 16, 2008 |
|
May 30, 2008 |
|
Series L |
|
$ |
0.412500 |
|
May 16, 2008 |
|
May 30, 2008 |
|
Series M |
|
$ |
0.434375 |
|
June 16, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Series N |
|
$ |
0.453125 |
|
June 16, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Series O |
|
$ |
0.523438 |
|
June 16, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Issuance of Unsecured Notes
In May 2008, we issued $325.0 million of 6.25% senior unsecured notes due in May 2013.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in or incorporated by reference into this Report, including, without limitation, those related to our future operations, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The words believe, estimate, expect, anticipate, intend, plan, seek, may and similar expressions or statements regarding future periods are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from any predictions of future results, performance or achievements that we express or imply in this Report. Some of the risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may affect future results include, among others:
· Changes in general economic and business conditions, including performance of financial markets;
· Our continued qualification as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
· Heightened competition for tenants and potential decreases in property occupancy;
· Potential increases in real estate construction costs;
· Potential changes in the financial markets and interest rates;
· Volatility in our stock price and trading volume;
· Our continuing ability to raise funds on favorable terms through the issuance of debt and equity in the capital markets;
· Our ability to successfully identify, acquire, develop and/or manage properties on terms that are favorable to us;
· Our ability to be flexible in the development and operation of joint venture properties;
· Our ability to successfully dispose of properties on terms that are favorable to us;
14
· Inherent risks in the real estate business including, but not limited to, tenant defaults, potential liability relating to environmental matters and liquidity of real estate investments; and
· Other risks and uncertainties described herein, as well as those risks and uncertainties discussed from time to time in our other reports and other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
This list of risks and uncertainties, however, is only a summary of some of the most important factors and is not intended to be exhaustive. Additional information regarding risk factors that may affect us is included under the caption Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, which we filed with the SEC on February 29, 2008, and is updated by us from time to time in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other public filings.
Although we presently believe that the plans, expectations and results expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements are reasonable, all forward-looking statements are inherently subjective, uncertain and subject to change, as they involve substantial risks and uncertainties beyond our control. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict the nature, or assess the potential impact, of each new factor on our business. Given these uncertainties, we caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any of our forward-looking statements for events or circumstances that arise after the statement is made, except as otherwise may be required by law.
Business Overview
We are a self-administered and self-managed REIT that began operations through a related entity in 1972. As of March 31, 2008, we:
· Owned or jointly controlled 730 industrial, office, healthcare and retail properties (including properties under development), consisting of more than 122 million square feet; and
· Owned or jointly controlled approximately 7,600 acres of land with an estimated future development potential of more than 111 million square feet of industrial, office, healthcare and retail properties.
We provide the following services for our properties and for certain properties owned by third parties and joint ventures:
· Property leasing;
· Property management;
· Asset management;
· Construction;
· Development; and
· Other tenant-related services.
Key Performance Indicators
Our operating results depend primarily upon rental income from our industrial, office and healthcare properties (Rental Operations). The following highlights the areas of Rental Operations that we consider critical for future revenue growth. All square footage totals and occupancy percentages reflect both wholly owned properties and properties in joint ventures.
15
Occupancy Analysis: Our ability to maintain favorable occupancy rates is a principal driver of our results of operations. The following table sets forth occupancy information regarding our in-service portfolio of rental properties (excluding in-service properties developed or acquired with the intent to sell, which are referred to as Build for Sale Properties) as of March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively (in thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
Total |
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Square Feet |
|
Total Square Feet |
|
Percent Occupied |
|
||||||
Type |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Industrial |
|
80,779 |
|
75,628 |
|
70.2 |
% |
69.8 |
% |
89.4 |
% |
92.6 |
% |
Office |
|
32,757 |
|
31,862 |
|
28.4 |
% |
29.4 |
% |
88.6 |
% |
91.9 |
% |
Other |
|
1,613 |
|
916 |
|
1.4 |
% |
0.8 |
% |
91.8 |
% |
95.0 |
% |
Total |
|
115,149 |
|
108,406 |
|
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
89.2 |
% |
92.4 |
% |
The decrease in occupancy in the first quarter of 2008, as compared to the first quarter of 2007, is the result of a significant increase in developments placed in service between the two periods, with certain of the rental properties placed in service not yet being stabilized. There are not significant differences in occupancy between wholly owned properties and properties held by unconsolidated subsidiaries.
Lease Expiration and Renewal: Our ability to maintain and improve occupancy rates primarily depends upon our continuing ability to re-lease expiring space. The following table reflects our in-service portfolio lease expiration schedule by property type as of March 31, 2008. The table indicates square footage and annualized net effective rents (based on March 2008 rental revenue) under expiring leases (in thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Portfolio |
|
Industrial |
|
Office |
|
Other |
|
||||||||||||||
Year of |
|
Square |
|
Ann. Rent |
|
% of |
|
Square |
|
Ann. Rent |
|
Square |
|
Ann. Rent |
|
Square |
|
Ann. Rent |
|
||||
Expiration |
|
Feet |
|
Revenue |
|
Revenue |
|
Feet |
|
Revenue |
|
Feet |
|
Revenue |
|
Feet |
|
Revenue |
|
||||
2008 |
|
7,157 |
|
$ |
39,518 |
|
5 |
% |
5,502 |
|
$ |
20,741 |
|
1,622 |
|
$ |
18,238 |
|
33 |
|
$ |
539 |
|
2009 |
|
12,633 |
|
83,423 |
|
11 |
% |
9,087 |
|
36,268 |
|
3,480 |
|
46,499 |
|
66 |
|
656 |
|
||||
2010 |
|
13,645 |
|
99,750 |
|
14 |
% |
9,427 |
|
40,614 |
|
4,205 |
|
58,949 |
|
13 |
|
187 |
|
||||
2011 |
|
14,881 |
|
90,935 |
|
13 |
% |
11,282 |
|
42,171 |
|
3,532 |
|
47,757 |
|
67 |
|
1,007 |
|
||||
2012 |
|
10,840 |
|
75,951 |
|
11 |
% |
7,390 |
|
29,285 |
|
3,404 |
|
45,777 |
|
46 |
|
889 |
|
||||
2013 |
|
11,016 |
|
92,592 |
|
13 |
% |
6,560 |
|
27,610 |
|
4,398 |
|
64,104 |
|
58 |
|
878 |
|
||||
2014 |
|
6,476 |
|
39,609 |
|
6 |
% |
4,890 |
|
18,226 |
|
1,558 |
|
20,918 |
|
28 |
|
465 |
|
||||
2015 |
|
8,423 |
|
61,996 |
|
9 |
% |
6,147 |
|
24,452 |
|
2,276 |
|
37,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2016 |
|
4,170 |
|
28,310 |
|
4 |
% |
3,000 |
|
10,836 |
|
959 |
|
15,031 |
|
211 |
|
2,443 |
|
||||
2017 |
|
6,518 |
|
45,682 |
|
6 |
% |
4,572 |
|
18,166 |
|
1,539 |
|
21,995 |
|
407 |
|
5,521 |
|
||||
2018 and Thereafter |
|
6,949 |
|
60,937 |
|
8 |
% |
4,349 |
|
21,592 |
|
2,046 |
|
31,664 |
|
554 |
|
7,681 |
|
||||
|
|
102,708 |
|
$ |
718,703 |
|
100 |
% |
72,206 |
|
$ |
289,961 |
|
29,019 |
|
$ |
408,476 |
|
1,483 |
|
$ |
20,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Square Feet |
|
115,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
80,779 |
|
|
|
32,757 |
|
|
|
1,613 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Percent Occupied |
|
89.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
89.4 |
% |
|
|
88.6 |
% |
|
|
91.8 |
% |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Note: Excludes Build for Sale Properties. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We renewed 70.6% and 81.6% of our leases up for renewal in the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 totaling approximately 2.7 million and 1.9 million square feet, respectively, on which we attained 7% and 5% growth in net effective rents.
The average term of renewals decreased from 3.6 years in the three months ended March 31, 2007 to 3.2 years in the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Future Development: Another source of growth in earnings is the development of additional properties. These properties should provide future earnings through income upon sale or from Rental Operations income as they are placed in service. We had 13.6 million square feet of property under development with total estimated costs upon completion of $1.1 billion at March 31, 2008, compared to 9.1 million square feet with total costs of $1.0 billion, at March 31, 2007.
16
The following table summarizes our properties under development as of March 31, 2008 (in thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Anticipated |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
Anticipated |
|
|
In-Service |
|
Square |
|
Percent |
|
Project |
|
Stabilized |
|
|
Date |
|
Feet |
|
Leased |
|
Costs |
|
Return (1) |
|
|
Held for Rental Buildings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Quarter 2008 |
|
4,265 |
|
23 |
% |
$ |
234,422 |
|
8.65 |
% |
3rd Quarter 2008 |
|
2,010 |
|
32 |
% |
166,759 |
|
9.10 |
% |
|
4th Quarter 2008 |
|
248 |
|
34 |
% |
48,875 |
|
9.24 |
% |
|
Thereafter |
|
758 |
|
68 |
% |
164,401 |
|
8.73 |
% |
|
|
|
7,281 |
|
31 |
% |
$ |
614,457 |
|
8.84 |
% |
Build for Sale Properties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Quarter 2008 |
|
1,044 |
|
100 |
% |
86,654 |
|
8.30 |
% |
|
3rd Quarter 2008 |
|
1,252 |
|
100 |
% |
78,858 |
|
8.43 |
% |
|
4th Quarter 2008 |
|
2,313 |
|
60 |
% |
87,950 |
|
7.88 |
% |
|
Thereafter |
|
1,758 |
|
76 |
% |
197,708 |
|
8.37 |
% |
|
|
|
6,367 |
|
79 |
% |
451,170 |
|
8.27 |
% |
|
Total |
|
13,648 |
|
53 |
% |
$ |
1,065,627 |
|
8.60 |
% |
(1) Anticipated yield upon leasing 95% of the property.
Acquisition and Disposition Activity: Gross sales proceeds related to dispositions of wholly owned held for rental properties were $18.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Additionally, our share of proceeds from sales of properties within unconsolidated joint ventures, in which we have less than a 100% interest, totaled $25.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, proceeds totaled $144.9 million for wholly owned held for rental properties and $5.1 million for our share of property sales from unconsolidated joint ventures. We had no dispositions of wholly owned properties developed for sale rather than rental for the three months ended March 31, 2008, but recognized gross proceeds of $25.9 million for such dispositions in the same period in 2007. Although the current credit environment has affected certain buyers ability to finance acquisitions, the timing of major transactions is the main reason for the decrease in disposition activity.
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, we acquired $27.3 million of income producing properties comprised of two industrial real estate properties in Savannah, Georgia. In the first quarter of 2007, we continued our expansion into the healthcare real estate market by completing the acquisition of Bremner Healthcare Real Estate, a national health care development and management firm. The initial consideration paid to the sellers totaled $47.1 million, and the sellers may be eligible for further contingent payments over three years following the acquisition date. We also acquired $15.4 million of undeveloped land in the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to $34.0 million in the same period in 2007.
Funds From Operations
Funds From Operations (FFO) is used by industry analysts and investors as a supplemental operating performance measure of an equity REIT like Duke. FFO is calculated in accordance with the definition that was adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT). NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of REIT operating performance that excludes historical cost depreciation, among other items, from net income determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure developed by NAREIT to compare the operating performance of REITs. The most comparable GAAP measure is net income (loss). FFO should not be considered as a substitute for net income or any other measures derived in accordance with GAAP and may not be comparable to other similarly titled measure of other companies.
17
Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry analysts and investors have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. FFO, as defined by NAREIT, represents GAAP net income (loss), excluding extraordinary items as defined under GAAP and gains or losses from sales of previously depreciated real estate assets, plus certain non-cash items such as real estate depreciation and amortization, and after similar adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
Management believes that the use of FFO, combined with the required primary GAAP presentations, improves the understanding of operating results of REITs among the investing public and makes comparisons of REIT operating results more meaningful. Management believes FFO is a useful measure for reviewing comparative operating and financial performance (although FFO should be reviewed in conjunction with net income which remains the primary measure of performance) because by excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously depreciated real estate assets and excluding real estate asset depreciation and amortization, FFO provides a useful comparison of the operating performance of our real estate between periods or as compared to different companies.
The following table shows a reconciliation of net income available for common shareholders to the calculation of FFO for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
Net income available for common shareholders |
|
$ |
4,048 |
|
$ |
68,563 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
79,121 |
|
67,739 |
|
||
Company share of joint venture depreciation and amortization |
|
6,928 |
|
4,968 |
|
||
Earnings from depreciable property sales wholly owned |
|
(1,110 |
) |
(51,720 |
) |
||
Earnings from depreciable property sales share of joint venture |
|
(19 |
) |
(1,960 |
) |
||
Minority interest share of adjustments |
|
(4,326 |
) |
(1,263 |
) |
||
Funds From Operations |
|
$ |
84,642 |
|
$ |
86,327 |
|
Results of Operations
A summary of our operating results and property statistics for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, is as follows (in thousands, except number of properties and per share data):
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
Rental Operations revenues from Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
227,901 |
|
$ |
209,796 |
|
Service Operations revenues from Continuing Operations |
|
14,776 |
|
14,730 |
|
||
Earnings from Continuing Rental Operations |
|
22,083 |
|
24,921 |
|
||
Earnings from Continuing Service Operations |
|
4,413 |
|
6,934 |
|
||
Operating income |
|
14,334 |
|
18,395 |
|
||
Net income available for common shareholders |
|
$ |
4,048 |
|
$ |
68,563 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
146,331 |
|
136,823 |
|
||
Weighted average common shares and potential dilutive securities |
|
154,596 |
|
149,465 |
|
||
Basic income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
.02 |
|
$ |
.13 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
$ |
.01 |
|
$ |
.37 |
|
Diluted income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
.02 |
|
$ |
.13 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
$ |
.01 |
|
$ |
.36 |
|
Number of in-service properties at end of period |
|
698 |
|
691 |
|
||
In-service square footage at end of period |
|
115,149 |
|
108,406 |
|
18
Comparison of Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 to Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
Rental Income From Continuing Operations
Overall, rental revenue from continuing operations increased from $202.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007, to $217.8 million for the same period in 2008. The following table reconciles rental revenue from continuing operations by reportable segment to our total reported rental revenue from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rental Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Office |
|
$ |
148,245 |
|
$ |
143,826 |
|
Industrial |
|
61,316 |
|
54,214 |
|
||
Non-reportable segments |
|
8,241 |
|
4,065 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
217,802 |
|
$ |
202,105 |
|
The following factors contributed to these results:
· |
|
We acquired nine properties and placed 40 developments in service from April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2008 that provided incremental revenues of $12.6 million in the first quarter of 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. |
· |
|
Lease termination fees increased from $3.4 million in the first quarter of 2007 to $7.6 million in the first quarter of 2008. |
Rental Expenses and Real Estate Taxes
The following table reconciles rental expenses and real estate taxes by reportable segment to our total reported amounts in the statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
Rental Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Office |
|
$ |
40,969 |
|
$ |
40,488 |
|
Industrial |
|
8,186 |
|
7,309 |
|
||
Non-reportable segments |
|
2,872 |
|
1,252 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
52,027 |
|
$ |
49,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real Estate Taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Office |
|
$ |
17,443 |
|
$ |
17,237 |
|
Industrial |
|
7,738 |
|
6,239 |
|
||
Non-reportable segments |
|
2,363 |
|
1,567 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
27,544 |
|
$ |
25,043 |
|
Of the overall $3.0 million increase in rental expenses in the first quarter of 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, $1.5 million was attributable to properties acquired and developments placed in service from April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2008.
Of the overall $2.5 million increase in real estate taxes in the first quarter of 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, $1.2 million was attributable to properties acquired and developments placed in service from April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2008. The remaining increase in real estate taxes was driven by increases in assessments by municipal authorities in our different markets.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased from $44.4 million in the first quarter of 2007 to $47.5 million in the first quarter of 2008 primarily due to carrying higher levels of borrowings under DRLPs unsecured line of credit. The outstanding balance increased from $330.0 million at March 31, 2007 to $631.0 million at March 31, 2008. This was somewhat offset by a reduction in interest rates between the two periods.
19
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased from $66.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2007 to $78.7 million for the same period in 2008 primarily due to the following:
· |
|
We recorded $5.8 million of additional depreciation expense for a portfolio of properties that no longer meets the criteria for being classified as held for sale. |
|
|
|
· |
|
Our held-for-rental asset base increased from acquisitions and developments during 2007. |
|
|
|
· |
|
We accelerated depreciation for certain assets related to terminated leases. |
Service Operations
Service Operations consists primarily of sales of properties developed or acquired with the intent to sell within a short period of time and the leasing, management, construction and development services for joint venture properties and properties owned by third parties. These operations are heavily influenced by the current state of the economy, as leasing and management fees are dependent upon occupancy while construction and development services rely on the expansion of business operations of third party property owners. Earnings from Service Operations decreased from $6.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 to $4.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008, primarily as a result of gains on the sale of two properties totaling $2.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to no such sales during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expenses decreased from $13.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 to $12.2 million for the same period in 2008. General and administrative expenses consist of two components. The first component is direct expenses that are not attributable to specific assets such as legal fees, audit fees, marketing costs, investor relations expenses and other corporate overhead. The second component is the unallocated indirect costs determined to be unrelated to the operation of our owned properties and Service Operations. Those indirect costs not allocated to these operations are charged to general and administrative expenses. While there was an increase in amount of indirect costs allocated to construction and leasing in 2008 compared to 2007 due to increases in wholly-owned and third-party activity in these areas, this was partially offset by an increase in the overall pool of overhead costs in 2008 necessitated by our overall growth.
Discontinued Operations
The results of operations for properties sold during the year or classified as held-for-sale to unrelated parties at the end of the period are required to be classified as discontinued operations. The property specific components of earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include rental revenues, rental expenses, real estate taxes, allocated interest expense, depreciation expense and minority interest, as well as the net gain or loss on the disposition of properties.
The operations of 34 buildings are currently classified as discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007. These 34 buildings consist of 17 industrial and 17 office properties. As a result, we classified net income (loss) from operations, net of minority interest, of $(173,000) and $2.0 million in discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Of these properties, one was sold during the first quarter of 2008 and 10 properties were sold during the first quarter of 2007. The gains on disposal of these properties, net of minority interest, of $1.1 million and $48.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are also reported in discontinued operations.
20
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements over the next twelve months, including payments of dividends and distributions, as well as recurring capital expenditures relating to maintaining our current real estate assets, primarily through working capital and proceeds received from real estate dispositions. Although we historically have not used any other sources of funds to pay for recurring capital expenditures on our current real estate investments, we may rely on the temporary use of borrowings needed to fund such expenditures during periods of high leasing volume.
We expect to meet long-term liquidity requirements, such as scheduled mortgage and unsecured debt maturities, property acquisitions, financing of development activities and other non-recurring capital improvements, primarily through the following sources:
· |
issuance of additional equity, including common and preferred shares; |
· |
issuance of additional debt securities; |
· |
undistributed cash provided by operating activities; and |
· |
proceeds received from real estate dispositions. |
In recognition of current economic conditions, we are constantly monitoring the state of the capital markets and accordingly managing our capital needs, specifically development expenditures and commitments. We will continue to utilize DRLPs $1.3 billion unsecured revolving line of credit to provide initial funding of new development expenditures and anticipate using multiple sources of capital including unsecured public debt, secured debt, preferred stock and private equity, as available, to meet our long term capital needs.
We believe our principal source of liquidity, cash flows from Rental Operations, provides a stable source of cash to fund operational expenses. We believe that this cash-based revenue stream is substantially aligned with revenue recognition (except for periodic straight-line rental income accruals and amortization of above or below market rents) as cash receipts from the leasing of rental properties are generally received in advance of or a short time following the actual revenue recognition.
We are subject to risks of decreased occupancy through market conditions, as well as tenant defaults and bankruptcies, and potential reduction in rental rates upon renewal or re-letting of properties, each of which would result in reduced cash flow from operations. However, we believe that these risks may be mitigated by our relatively strong market presence in most of our markets and the fact that we perform in-house credit reviews and analyses on major tenants and all significant leases before they are executed.
Debt and Equity Securities
We use DRLPs line of credit to fund development activities, acquire additional rental properties and provide working capital.
At March 31, 2008, we had on file with the SEC an automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 relating to the offer and sale, from time to time, of an indeterminate amount of debt securities (including guarantees thereof), common shares, preferred shares, depositary shares, warrants, stock purchase contracts and Units comprised of one or more of the securities described therein. From time to time, we expect to issue additional securities under this automatic shelf registration statement to fund development and acquisition of additional rental properties and to fund the repayment of the credit facility and other long-term debt upon maturity.
21
In May 2008, we issued $325.0 million of 6.25% senior unsecured notes due in May 2013.
The indentures (and related supplemental indentures) governing our outstanding series of notes also require us to comply with financial ratios and other covenants regarding our operations. We were in compliance with all such covenants as of March 31, 2008.
Sale of Real Estate Assets
We utilize sales of real estate assets as an additional source of liquidity. We pursue opportunities to sell real estate assets at favorable prices to capture value created by us, as well as to improve the overall quality of our portfolio by recycling sales proceeds into new properties with greater value creation opportunities.
We had entered into a preliminary agreement to sell a portfolio of 14 buildings in our Cleveland Office market in mid-2007. In the first quarter of 2008 the agreement was cancelled due to the potential buyer not being able to secure financing on acceptable terms. It is our strategy to operate the buildings through our Rental Operations until we are able to sell the buildings at a favorable price.
Uses of Liquidity
Our principal uses of liquidity include the following:
· property investments;
· recurring leasing/capital costs;
· dividends and distributions to shareholders and unitholders;
· long-term debt maturities; and
· other contractual obligations.
Property Investment
We evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook, supply and long-term growth potential.
Recurring Expenditures
One of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments. The following is a summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
Recurring tenant improvements |
|
$ |
10,803 |
|
$ |
10,333 |
|
Recurring leasing costs |
|
6,098 |
|
7,732 |
|
||
Building improvements |
|
967 |
|
974 |
|
||
Totals |
|
$ |
17,868 |
|
$ |
19,039 |
|
Debt Maturities
Debt outstanding at March 31, 2008 totaled $4.3 billion with a weighted average interest rate of 5.48%, maturing at various dates through 2028. We had $3.1 billion of unsecured debt, $635.1 million outstanding on our unsecured lines of credit and $506.1 million of secured debt outstanding at March 31, 2008. Scheduled principal amortization and maturities of such debt totaled $161.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
22
The following is a summary of the scheduled future amortization and maturities of our indebtedness at March 31, 2008 (in thousands, except percentage data):
|
|
Future Repayments |
|
Weighted Average |
|
|||||||
|
|
Scheduled |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate of |
|
|||
Year |
|
Amortization |
|
Maturities |
|
Total |
|
Future Repayments |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2008 |
|
$ |
8,610 |
|
$ |
109,940 |
|
$ |
118,550 |
|
6.79 |
% |
2009 |
|
11,099 |
|
275,000 |
|
286,099 |
|
7.36 |
% |
|||
2010 |
|
10,809 |
|
806,000 |
|
816,809 |
|
3.78 |
% |
|||
2011 |
|
10,781 |
|
1,037,207 |
|
1,047,988 |
|
5.11 |
% |
|||
2012 |
|
8,649 |
|
201,216 |
|
209,865 |
|
5.89 |
% |
|||
2013 |
|
8,571 |
|
150,000 |
|
158,571 |
|
4.71 |
% |
|||
2014 |
|
8,661 |
|
272,112 |
|
280,773 |
|
6.44 |
% |
|||
2015 |
|
6,774 |
|
|
|
6,774 |
|
6.05 |
% |
|||
2016 |
|
5,763 |
|
490,900 |
|
496,663 |
|
6.16 |
% |
|||
2017 |
|
4,517 |
|
457,761 |
|
462,278 |
|
5.94 |
% |
|||
2018 |
|
3,055 |
|
300,000 |
|
303,055 |
|
6.16 |
% |
|||
Thereafter |
|
24,714 |
|
50,000 |
|
74,714 |
|
6.76 |
% |
|||
|
|
$ |
112,003 |
|
$ |
4,150,136 |
|
$ |
4,262,139 |
|
5.48 |
% |
Historical Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents were $15.5 million and $9.5 million at March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The following highlights significant changes in net cash associated with our operating, investing and financing activities (in millions):
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
Net Cash Provided by |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating Activities |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Cash Provided by (Used for) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investing Activities |
|
$ |
(154.3 |
) |
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Cash Provided by (Used for) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Financing Activities |
|
$ |
119.6 |
|
$ |
(79.5 |
) |
Operating Activities
Cash flows from operating activities provide the cash necessary to meet normal operational requirements of our Rental Operations and Service Operations activities. The receipt of rental income from Rental Operations continues to provide the primary source of our revenues and operating cash flows. In addition, we develop buildings with the intent to sell them at or soon after completion, which provides another significant source of operating cash flow activity. Highlights of such activity are as follows:
· During the three-month period ended March 31, 2008, we incurred Build for Sale Property development costs of $41.2 million, compared to $70.5 million for the period ended March 31, 2007. The difference is reflective of the decreased activity in our held-for-sale pipeline. The pipeline of held-for-sale projects under construction as of March 31, 2008, has anticipated costs upon completion of $451.2 million.
· We had no sales of Build for Sale Properties in the first quarter of 2008, compared to sales of two Build for Sale Properties for the same period in 2007. We received net proceeds of $25.4 million and recognized pre-tax gains of $2.9 million on the sales in the first quarter of 2007.
23
Investing Activities
Investing activities are one of the primary uses of our liquidity. Development and acquisition activities typically generate additional rental revenues and provide cash flows for operational requirements. Highlights of significant cash sources and uses are as follows:
· Development costs increased to $151.9 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 from $96.6 million for the same period in 2007 as the result of an increase in development activity in 2008.
· During the first quarter of 2008, we paid cash of $8.7 million for real estate acquisitions and $14.7 million for undeveloped land acquisitions, compared to $36.1 million in real estate acquisitions and $34.7 million in acquisitions of undeveloped land in the same period in 2007.
· Sales of land and depreciated property provided $26.7 million in net cash proceeds for the three- month period ended March 31, 2008, compared to $176.7 million for the same period in 2007. The first quarter of 2007 included the sale of an eight building portfolio of office properties in the Cleveland market for net proceeds of $139.3 million. We continue to dispose of non-strategic and older properties as part of our capital recycling program to fund acquisitions and new development while improving the overall quality of our investment portfolio.
· We received financing distributions (as the result of the sale of properties or refinancing) of $38.8 million from unconsolidated companies in the three-month period ended March 31, 2008, compared to $53.5 million for the same period in 2007.
Financing Activities
The following items highlight major fluctuation in net cash flow related to financing activities in the first quarter of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007:
· In January 2008, we repaid $125.0 million of senior unsecured notes with an effective interest rate of 3.36% on their scheduled maturity date.
· In February 2008, we received net proceeds of approximately $290.4 million from the issuance of our Series O Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares; we had no new preferred equity issuances in the same period in 2007.
· We increased net borrowings on DRLPs $1.3 billion line of credit by $88.0 million and $13.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
· In March 2008, we settled three forward-starting swaps and made a cash payment of $14.6 million to the counterparties.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Based on the guidance provided by FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP No. 157-2), we have only partially implemented the guidance promulgated under SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008. SFAS 157 will not be applied during 2008 to nonfinancial long lived asset groups that may be measured for an impairment assessment, reporting units measured at fair value in the first step of the goodwill impairment test, and nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination. We will fully apply the provisions of SFAS 157 beginning January 1, 2009 and do not expect there to be a material impact to the financial statements.
24
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations (SFAS 141R) and SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment to ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). SFAS 141R and SFAS 160 require most identifiable assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests and goodwill acquired in a business combination to be recorded at full fair value and require noncontrolling interests (previously referred to as minority interests) to be reported as a component of equity, which changes the accounting for transactions with noncontrolling interest holders. Both Statements are effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and earlier adoption is prohibited. SFAS 141R will be applied to business combinations after the effective date. SFAS 160 will be applied prospectively to all noncontrolling interests, including any that arose before the effective date. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 141R and SFAS 160 on our results of operations and financial position.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures for derivative instruments and hedging activities, specifically in regard to the purpose of the derivative and how the derivative and hedging activities affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 and early application is allowed. We will apply the disclosure requirements of SFAS 161 beginning in 2009.
Investments in Unconsolidated Companies
We analyze our investments in joint ventures under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46(R)), to determine if the joint venture is a variable interest entity (a VIE, as defined by FIN 46(R)) and would require consolidation. To the extent that our joint ventures do not qualify as VIEs, we further assess under the guidelines of Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 04-5, Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity when the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights (EITF 04-5); Statement of Position 78-9, Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures; Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements and SFAS No. 94, Consolidation of All Majority-Owned Subsidiaries, to determine if the venture should be consolidated.
We have equity interests in unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures that own and operate rental properties and hold land for development. The equity method of accounting is used for these investments in which we have the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over operating and financial policies. As a result, the assets and liabilities of these joint ventures are not included on our balance sheet.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of our line of credit, preferred shares and long-term debt used to maintain liquidity and fund capital expenditures and expansion of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve our objectives, we borrow primarily at fixed rates and may enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps, caps and treasury locks in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. We do not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.
25
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. These disclosure controls and procedures are further designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based upon the foregoing, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in all material respects.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
From time to time, we are parties to a variety of legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of our businesses. While these matters generally are covered by insurance, there is no assurance that our insurance will cover any particular proceeding or claim. We presently believe that all of these proceedings to which we were subject as of March 31, 2008, taken as a whole, will not have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, business financial condition or results of operations.
In addition to the other information set forth in this Report, you should carefully review and consider the information contained in our other reports and periodic filings that we make with the SEC, including, without limitation the information contained under the caption Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Those risk factors could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The risks that we describe in our public filings are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or that we currently deem to be immaterial, also may materially adversely affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations.
26
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
None
(b) Use of Proceeds
None
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
From time to time, we repurchase our common shares under a $750 million repurchase program that initially was approved by the board of directors and publicly announced in October 2001 (the Repurchase Program). In July 2005, the board of directors authorized management to purchase up to $750 million of common shares pursuant to this plan. Under the Repurchase Program, we also execute share repurchases on an ongoing basis associated with certain employee elections under our compensation and benefit programs.
The following table shows the share repurchase activity for each of the three months in the quarter ended March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Average Price |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Month |
|
Purchased (1) |
|
Paid per Share |
|
Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
11,159 |
|
$ |
24.98 |
|
11,159 |
|
February |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
March |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
11,159 |
|
$ |
24.98 |
|
11,159 |
|
(1) All 11,159 shares repurchased represent shares swapped to pay the exercise price of stock options.
The number of common shares that may yet be repurchased in the open market to fund shares purchased under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, was 81,840 as of March 31, 2008. The approximate dollar value of common shares that may yet be repurchased under the Repurchase Program was $361.0 million as of March 31, 2008.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
During the period covered by this Report, we did not default under the terms of any of our material indebtedness, nor has there been any material arrearage of dividends or other material uncured delinquency with respect to any class of our preferred shares.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
During the period covered by this Report, there was no information required to be disclosed by us in a Current Report on Form 8-K that was not so reported, nor were there any material changes to the procedures by which our security holders may recommend nominees to our board of directors.
27
(a) Exhibits
3.1(i) |
|
Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of Duke Realty Corporation (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the SEC on May 13, 2003, File No. 001-09044, and incorporated herein by this reference). |
|
|
|
3.1(ii) |
|
Amendment to the Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of Duke Realty Corporation, establishing the amount, terms and rights of the Companys 6.625% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (filed as Exhibit 3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on August 27, 2003, File No. 001-09044, and incorporated herein by this reference). |
|
|
|
3.1(iii) |
|
Amendment to the Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of Duke Realty Corporation, establishing the amount, terms and rights of the Companys 6.5% Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (filed as Exhibit 3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on February 26, 2004, File No. 001-09044, and incorporated herein by this reference). |
|
|
|
3.1(iv) |
|
Amendment to the Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of Duke Realty Corporation, establishing the amount, terms and rights of the Companys 6.6% Series L Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (filed as Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on November 29, 2004, File No. 001-09044, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.1(v) |
|
Amendment to the Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of Duke Realty Corporation, amending the Designating Amendment to the Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of Duke Realty Corporation, establishing the amount, terms and rights of the Companys 6.95% Series M Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on July 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by this reference). |
|
|
|
3.1(vi) |
|
Amendment to the Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of Duke Realty Corporation, establishing the amount, terms and rights of the Companys 7.25% Series N Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on July 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by this reference). |
|
|
|
3.1(vii) |
|
Amendment to the Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of Duke Realty Corporation, deleting Exhibits A, D, E, F, H and I and de-designating the related series of preferred shares (filed as Exhibit 3.1(viii) to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the SEC on August 7, 2007, File No. 001-09044, and incorporated herein by this reference). |
28
3.1(viii) |
|
Amendment to the Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of Duke Realty Corporation, deleting Exhibit B and de-designating the related series of preferred shares (filed as Exhibit 3.1(viii) to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the SEC on February 29, 2008, File No. 001-09044, and incorporated herein by this reference). |
|
|
|
3.1(ix) |
|
Amendment to the Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of Duke Realty Corporation, establishing the amount, terms and rights of Duke Realty Corporations 8.375% Series O Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A, as filed with the SEC on February 22, 2008, File No. 001-09044, and incorporated herein by this reference). |
|
|
|
3.2(i) |
|
Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of Duke Realty Corporation (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the SEC on May 13, 2003, File No. 001-09044, and incorporated herein by this reference). |
|
|
|
3.2(ii) |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Third Amended and Restated By-Laws of Duke Realty Corporation (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on February 7, 2008, File No. 001-09044, and incorporated herein by this reference). |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Deposit Agreement, dated as of February 22, 2008, by and among Duke Realty Corporation, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as depositary, and the holders from time to time of the Depositary Receipts (which includes as an exhibit thereto the form of Depositary Receipt) (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A, as filed with the SEC on February 22, 2008, File No. 001-09044, and incorporated herein by this reference). |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Statement Regarding Computation of Earnings. ** |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends.* |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
Ratio of Earnings to Debt Service.* |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer.* |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer.* |
* Filed herewith.
** Data required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128, Earnings per Share, is provided in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report.
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
DUKE REALTY CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 12, 2008 |
|
/s/ Dennis D. Oklak |
|
|
Dennis D. Oklak |
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive
Officer and |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark Denien |
|
|
Mark Denien |
|
|
Senior Vice President,
Corporate |
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |