e6vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the month of August 2008
Commission File Number 001-33161
NORTH AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Zone 3 Acheson Industrial Area
2-53016 Highway 60
Acheson, Alberta
Canada T7X 5A7
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of
Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): o
Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the
registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection
with Rule 12g3-2(b):
Documents Included as Part of this Report
1. |
|
Interim consolidated financial statements of North American Energy Partners Inc. for the
three months ended June 30, 2008. |
|
2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NORTH AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Peter Dodd
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Peter Dodd |
|
|
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date: August 13, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
NORTH AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
For the three months ended June 30, 2008
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars)
(Unaudited)
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Interim
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In
thousands of Canadian dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
51,332
|
|
|
$
|
32,871
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
127,554
|
|
|
|
166,002
|
|
Unbilled revenue
|
|
|
89,533
|
|
|
|
70,883
|
|
Inventory (note 3(c))
|
|
|
6,900
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Prepaid expenses and deposits
|
|
|
8,594
|
|
|
|
9,300
|
|
Other assets (note 3(c))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,703
|
|
Future income taxes
|
|
|
10,563
|
|
|
|
8,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,476
|
|
|
|
291,086
|
|
Future income taxes
|
|
|
8,889
|
|
|
|
18,199
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
Plant and equipment (note 5)
|
|
|
331,575
|
|
|
|
281,039
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
200,072
|
|
|
|
200,072
|
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $2,383
(March 31, 2008 $2,105)
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
|
2,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
837,722
|
|
|
$
|
793,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
148,578
|
|
|
|
113,143
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
30,025
|
|
|
|
45,078
|
|
Billings in excess of costs incurred and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
12,328
|
|
|
|
4,772
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
4,747
|
|
|
|
4,733
|
|
Current portion of derivative financial instruments
(note 10(a))
|
|
|
4,803
|
|
|
|
4,720
|
|
Future income taxes
|
|
|
9,467
|
|
|
|
10,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,948
|
|
|
|
183,353
|
|
Deferred lease inducements
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
941
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
9,968
|
|
|
|
10,043
|
|
Director deferred stock unit liability
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Senior notes (note 6(b))
|
|
|
195,613
|
|
|
|
198,245
|
|
Derivative financial instruments (note 10(a))
|
|
|
90,978
|
|
|
|
93,019
|
|
Asset retirement obligation (note 7)
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future income taxes
|
|
|
24,620
|
|
|
|
24,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533,227
|
|
|
|
510,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares (authorized unlimited number of voting
and non-voting common shares; issued and outstanding
36,036,476 voting common shares (March 31, 2008
35,929,476 voting common shares) (note 8(a))
|
|
|
299,871
|
|
|
|
298,436
|
|
Contributed surplus (note 8(b))
|
|
|
3,824
|
|
|
|
4,215
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
(19,287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,495
|
|
|
|
283,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantee (note 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
837,722
|
|
|
$
|
793,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements.
2
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations, Comprehensive
Income
(Loss) and Retained Earnings (Deficit)
(In thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(see note 4)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
258,987
|
|
|
$
|
167,627
|
|
Project costs
|
|
|
148,631
|
|
|
|
94,673
|
|
Equipment costs
|
|
|
45,811
|
|
|
|
45,139
|
|
Equipment operating lease expense
|
|
|
8,798
|
|
|
|
3,935
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
8,158
|
|
|
|
8,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
47,589
|
|
|
|
14,904
|
|
General and administrative costs
|
|
|
19,215
|
|
|
|
14,627
|
|
Loss on disposal of plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
Loss on disposal of asset held for sale
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income before the undernoted
|
|
|
26,930
|
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
Interest expense (note 9)
|
|
|
6,449
|
|
|
|
6,809
|
|
Foreign exchange gain
|
|
|
(1,641
|
)
|
|
|
(17,100
|
)
|
Realized and unrealized (gain)/loss on derivative financial
instruments (note 10(a))
|
|
|
(2,265
|
)
|
|
|
21,514
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
24,405
|
|
|
|
(11,493
|
)
|
Income taxes (note 12(c)):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Future income taxes (recovery)
|
|
|
5,309
|
|
|
|
(2,932
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) for the
period
|
|
|
19,096
|
|
|
|
(8,582
|
)
|
Deficit, beginning of period as previously reported
|
|
|
(19,287
|
)
|
|
|
(55,526
|
)
|
Change in accounting policy related to financial instruments
(note 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,545
|
)
|
Change in account policy related to inventories (note 3(c))
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings (deficit), end of period
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
(67,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic
(note 8(c))
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted
(note 8(c))
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements.
3
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands of Canadian dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(see note 4)
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the period
|
|
$
|
19,096
|
|
|
$
|
(8,582
|
)
|
Items not affecting cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
8,158
|
|
|
|
8,976
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Amortization of deferred lease inducements
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Loss on disposal of plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets held for sale
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
Unrealized foreign exchange gain on senior notes
|
|
|
(1,831
|
)
|
|
|
(17,150
|
)
|
Amortization of bond issue costs, premiums and financing costs
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
Unrealized change in the fair value of derivative financial
instruments
|
|
|
(2,933
|
)
|
|
|
20,846
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense (note 14)
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
Accretion expense asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future income taxes
|
|
|
5,309
|
|
|
|
(2,932
|
)
|
Net changes in non-cash working capital (note 12(b))
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
4,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,341
|
|
|
|
7,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,581
|
)
|
Purchase of plant and equipment
|
|
|
(59,349
|
)
|
|
|
(10,193
|
)
|
Additions to assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,248
|
)
|
Proceeds on disposal of plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
3,690
|
|
Proceeds on disposal of assets held for sale
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
10,200
|
|
Net changes in non-cash working capital (note 12(b))
|
|
|
43,473
|
|
|
|
(4,358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,332
|
)
|
|
|
(4,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
Repayment of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(1,225
|
)
|
|
|
(802
|
)
|
Issue of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
Stock options exercised (note 8(a))
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
(1,329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
18,461
|
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
32,871
|
|
|
|
7,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
51,332
|
|
|
$
|
9,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information (note 12(a))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements.
4
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
For the three months ended June 30, 2008
(Amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share
amounts or unless otherwise specified)
(Unaudited)
North American Energy Partners Inc. was incorporated under the
Canada Business Corporations Act on October 17, 2003. On
November 26, 2003, North American Energy Partners Inc. (the
Company) purchased all the issued and outstanding
shares of North American Construction Group Inc.
(NACGI), including subsidiaries of NACGI, from
Norama Ltd. which had been operating continuously in Western
Canada since 1953. The Company had no operations prior to
November 26, 2003.
The Company undertakes several types of projects including heavy
construction, industrial and commercial site development,
pipeline and piling installations in Canada.
These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements (the
financial statements) are prepared in accordance
with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) for interim financial statements and do not
include all of the disclosures normally contained in the
Companys annual consolidated financial statements. Since
the determination of many assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses is dependent on future events, the preparation of these
financial statements requires the use of estimates and
assumptions. In the opinion of management, these financial
statements have been prepared within reasonable limits of
materiality. Except as disclosed in note 3, these financial
statements follow the same significant accounting policies as
described and used in the most recent annual consolidated
financial statements of the Company for the year ended
March 31, 2008 and should be read in conjunction with those
consolidated financial statements.
These financial statements include the accounts of the Company,
its wholly-owned subsidiaries, North American Construction
Group Inc. and NACG Finance LLC, the Companys joint
venture, Noramac Ventures Inc. and the following 100% owned
subsidiaries of NACGI:
|
|
|
|
|
North American Caisson Ltd.
|
|
|
|
North American Construction Ltd.
|
|
|
|
North American Engineering Ltd.
|
|
|
|
North American Enterprises Ltd.
|
|
|
|
North American Industries Inc.
|
|
|
|
North American Mining Inc.
|
|
|
|
North American Maintenance Ltd.
|
|
|
|
North American Pipeline Inc.
|
|
|
|
North American Road Inc.
|
|
|
|
North American Services Inc.
|
|
|
|
North American Site Development Ltd.
|
|
|
|
North American Site Services Inc.
|
|
|
|
North American Pile Driving Inc.
|
|
|
3.
|
Recently
adopted Canadian accounting pronouncements
|
|
|
a)
|
Financial
instruments disclosure and
presentation
|
Effective April 1, 2008, the Company prospectively adopted
the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
(CICA) Sections 3862, Financial
Instruments Disclosures, which replaces CICA
3861 and provides expanded disclosure requirements that enable
users to evaluate the significance of financial instruments on
the entitys financial position and its performance and the
nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments to
which the entity is exposed during the period and at the balance
sheet, and how the entity manages those risks. This standard
harmonizes disclosures with International Financial Reporting
Standards. The Company has
5
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
provided the additional required disclosures in note 10 to
its interim consolidated financial statements for the three
months ended June 30, 2008.
Effective April 1, 2008, the Company adopted CICA issued
Handbook Section 3863, Financial Instruments
Presentation. This Section establishes standards for
presentation of financial instruments and non-financial
derivatives. It deals with the classification of financial
instruments, from the perspective of the issuer, between
liabilities and equity, the classification of related interest,
dividends, gains and losses, and the circumstances in which
financial assets and financial liabilities are offset. The
adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the
presentation of financial instruments in the Companys
financial statements.
Effective April 1, 2008, the Company prospectively adopted
CICA Section 1535, Capital Disclosures, which
requires disclosure of qualitative and quantitative information
that enables users to evaluate the Companys objectives,
policies and process for managing capital. The Company has
provided the additional required disclosures in note 11 to
its interim consolidated financial statements for the three
months ended June 30, 2008.
Effective April 1, 2008, the Company retrospectively
adopted CICA Section 3031, Inventories without
restatement. This standard requires inventories to be measured
at the lower of cost and net realizable value and provides
guidance on the determination of cost, including the allocation
of overheads and other costs to inventories, the requirement for
an entity to use a consistent cost formula for inventory of a
similar nature and use, and the reversal of previous write-downs
to net realizable value when there is subsequent increases in
the value of inventories. This new standard also clarifies that
spare component parts that do not qualify for recognition as
property, plant and equipment should be classified as inventory.
Effective April 1, 2008, the Company reversed a tire
impairment that was previously recorded at March 31, 2008
in other assets of $1,383 with a corresponding decrease to
opening deficit of $991 net of future taxes of $392. The
Company then reclassified $5,086 of tires and spare component
parts from other assets to inventory. As
at June 30, 2008, inventory is comprised of tires and spare
component parts of $6,790 and job materials of $110. The Company
carries inventory at the lower of weighted average cost and net
realizable value. The carrying amount of inventories pledged as
security for borrowings under the revolving credit facility is
approximately $6,900 as at June 30, 2008.
Effective April 1, 2008, the Company prospectively adopted
CICA Section 1400, General Standards of Financial
Statement Presentation. These amendments require
management to assess an entitys ability to continue as a
going concern. When management is aware of material
uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast
doubt on an entitys ability to continue as a going
concern, those uncertainties must be disclosed. In assessing the
appropriateness of the going concern assumption, the standard
requires management to consider all available information about
the future, which is at least, but not limited to, twelve months
from the balance sheet date. The adoption of this standard did
not have a material impact on the presentation and disclosures
within the Companys consolidated financial statements.
|
|
e)
|
Recent
Canadian accounting pronouncements not yet adopted
|
|
|
i.
|
Goodwill
and intangible assets
|
In February 2008, the CICA issued Handbook Section 3064,
(CICA 3064) Goodwill and Intangible Assets. CICA
3064, which replaces Section 3062, Goodwill and Intangible
Assets, and Section 3450, Research and Development Costs,
establishes standards for the recognition, measurement and
disclosure of goodwill and
6
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
intangible assets. The provisions relating to the definition and
initial recognition of intangible assets, including internally
generated intangible assets, are equivalent to the corresponding
provisions of International Accounting Standard IAS 38,
Intangible Assets. This new standard is effective for the
Companys interim and annual consolidated financial
statements commencing April 1, 2009. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of this standard.
In preparing the financial statements for the year ended
March 31, 2008, the Company determined that its previously
issued interim unaudited consolidated financial statements for
the three months ended June 30, 2007 did not properly
account for an embedded derivative that is not closely related
to the host contract with respect to price escalation features
in a supplier maintenance contract. As disclosed in the annual
consolidated statements, the Company has restated its original
transition adjustment on adoption of CICA Handbook
Section 3855, Financial Instruments Recognition
and Measurement disclosed in the financial instruments for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 and recorded the fair
value of $2,474 related to this embedded derivative on
April 1, 2007, with corresponding increase in opening
deficit of $1,769, net of future income taxes of $705.
The embedded derivative is measured at fair value and included
in derivative financial instruments on the consolidated balance
sheet with changes in fair value recognized in net income since
April 1, 2007 and the comparative figures for the quarter
ended June 30, 2007 have been restated to account for this
embedded derivative.
The impact of this restatement on the Interim Consolidated
Statements of Operations, Comprehensive Income (Loss) and
Deficit is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized loss (gain)
|
|
$
|
23,949
|
|
|
$
|
(2,435
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,514
|
|
Future income taxes
|
|
|
(3,626
|
)
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
(2,932
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(10,323
|
)
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
(8,582
|
)
|
Change in accounting policy related to financial instruments
|
|
$
|
(1,776
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,769
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,545
|
)
|
Deficit, end of period
|
|
|
(67,625
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(67,653
|
)
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
The impact of this restatement on the Interim Consolidated
Balance Sheets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at June 30, 2007
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
$
|
87,763
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
87,802
|
|
Future income taxes (long-term asset)
|
|
|
22,990
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
23,001
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
(67,625
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(67,653
|
)
|
The impact of this restatement on the Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(10,323
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,741
|
|
|
$
|
(8,582
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
23,281
|
|
|
|
(2,435
|
)
|
|
|
20,846
|
|
Future income taxes
|
|
|
(3,626
|
)
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
(2,932
|
)
|
7
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net Book Value
|
|
|
Heavy equipment
|
|
$
|
329,739
|
|
|
$
|
67,339
|
|
|
$
|
262,400
|
|
Major component parts in use
|
|
|
16,204
|
|
|
|
2,391
|
|
|
|
13,813
|
|
Other equipment
|
|
|
18,058
|
|
|
|
6,679
|
|
|
|
11,379
|
|
Licensed motor vehicles
|
|
|
8,769
|
|
|
|
5,863
|
|
|
|
2,906
|
|
Office and computer equipment
|
|
|
9,938
|
|
|
|
3,876
|
|
|
|
6,062
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
20,267
|
|
|
|
3,852
|
|
|
|
16,415
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
5,081
|
|
Assets under capital lease
|
|
|
23,842
|
|
|
|
10,323
|
|
|
|
13,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
433,159
|
|
|
$
|
101,584
|
|
|
$
|
331,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net Book Value
|
|
|
Heavy equipment
|
|
$
|
281,975
|
|
|
$
|
62,539
|
|
|
$
|
219,436
|
|
Major component parts in use
|
|
|
12,291
|
|
|
|
4,797
|
|
|
|
7,494
|
|
Other equipment
|
|
|
17,086
|
|
|
|
6,232
|
|
|
|
10,854
|
|
Licensed motor vehicles
|
|
|
8,981
|
|
|
|
6,110
|
|
|
|
2,871
|
|
Office and computer equipment
|
|
|
9,016
|
|
|
|
3,479
|
|
|
|
5,537
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
19,530
|
|
|
|
3,443
|
|
|
|
16,087
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
5,165
|
|
Assets under capital lease
|
|
|
23,271
|
|
|
|
9,676
|
|
|
|
13,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
378,422
|
|
|
$
|
97,383
|
|
|
$
|
281,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, additions of
plant and equipment included $1,164 for capital leases (three
months ended June 30, 2007 $13). Depreciation
of equipment under capital leases of $648 (three months ended
June 30, 2007 $533) is included in depreciation
expense.
|
|
a)
|
Revolving
credit facility
|
On June 7, 2007, the Company modified its amended and
restated credit agreement to provide for borrowings of up to
$125.0 million (previously $55.0 million) under which
revolving loans and letters of credit may be issued. Based upon
the Companys current credit rating, prime rate revolving
loans under the agreement will bear interest at the Canadian
prime rate plus 0.25% per annum, Canadian bankers
acceptances have stamping fees equal to 1.75% per annum and
letters of credit are subject to a fee of 1.25% per annum.
The credit facility is secured by a first priority lien on
substantially all the Companys existing and after-acquired
property and contains certain restrictive covenants including,
but not limited to, incurring additional debt, transferring or
selling assets, making investments including acquisitions or to
pay dividends or redeem shares of capital stock. The Company is
also required to meet certain financial covenants under the new
credit agreement.
As of June 30, 2008, the Company had outstanding borrowings
of $nil under the revolving credit facility and had issued
$20.7 million in letters of credit to support bonding
requirements and performance guarantees associated
8
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
with customer contracts and operating leases. The Companys
borrowing availability under the facility was
$104.3 million at June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
Principal outstanding ($US)
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
Unrealized foreign exchange
|
|
|
3,720
|
|
|
|
5,574
|
|
Unamortized financing costs and premiums, net
|
|
|
(2,861
|
)
|
|
|
(3,059
|
)
|
Fair value of embedded prepayment and early redemption options
|
|
|
(5,246
|
)
|
|
|
(4,270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
195,613
|
|
|
$
|
198,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
83/4% senior
notes were issued on November 26, 2003 in the amount of
US$200 million (Canadian $263 million). These notes
mature on December 1, 2011 with interest payable
semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year.
The
83/4% senior
notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally with all
other existing and future unsecured senior debt and senior to
any subordinated debt that may be issued by the Company or any
of its subsidiaries. The notes are effectively subordinated to
all secured debt to the extent of the outstanding amount of such
debt.
The
83/4% senior
notes are redeemable at the option of the Company, in whole or
in part, at any time on or after: December 1, 2007 at
104.4% of the principal amount; December 1, 2008 at 102.2%
of the principal amount; December 1, 2009 at 100.00% of the
principal amount; plus, in each case, interest accrued to the
redemption date.
If a change of control occurs, the Company will be required to
offer to purchase all or a portion of each holders
83/4% senior
notes, at a purchase price in cash equal to 101.0% of the
principal amount of the notes offered for repurchase plus
accrued interest to the date of purchase.
As at June 30, 2008, the Companys effective weighted
average interest rate on its
83/4% senior
notes, including the effect of financing costs and premiums,
net, was approximately 9.42%.
|
|
7.
|
Asset
retirement obligation
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company
recorded an asset retirement obligation related to the future
retirement of a facility on leased land. Accretion expense
associated with this obligation is included in Equipment Costs
in the Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations,
Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Retained Earnings (Deficit).
At June 30, 2008, estimated undiscounted cash flows
required to settle the obligation were $1,454. The credit
adjusted risk-free rate assumed in measuring the asset
retirement obligation was 8.75%. The Company expects to settle
this obligation in 2021.
9
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Authorized:
Unlimited number of common voting shares
Unlimited number of common non-voting shares
Issued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Common voting shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2008
|
|
|
35,929,476
|
|
|
$
|
298,436
|
|
Issued on exercise of options
|
|
|
107,000
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
Transferred from contributed surplus on exercise of options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
36,036,476
|
|
|
$
|
299,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
4,215
|
|
Stock-based compensation (note 14)
|
|
|
254
|
|
Deferred performance share unit plan (note 14)
|
|
|
113
|
|
Transferred to common shares on exercise of options
|
|
|
(758
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
3,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c)
|
Net
income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
19,096
|
|
|
$
|
(8,582
|
)
|
Weighted average number of common shares
|
|
|
35,968,046
|
|
|
|
35,671,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
19,096
|
|
|
$
|
(8,582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares
|
|
|
35,968,046
|
|
|
|
35,671,220
|
|
Dilutive effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
1,011,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of diluted common shares
|
|
|
36,979,759
|
|
|
|
35,671,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2007 the effect of
outstanding stock options on loss per share was anti-dilutive.
As such, the effect of outstanding stock options used to
calculate the diluted net loss per share has not been disclosed.
10
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Interest on senior notes
|
|
$
|
5,834
|
|
|
$
|
5,834
|
|
Amortization of bond issue costs and premiums
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
Interest on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
6,290
|
|
|
|
6,412
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Other interest
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,449
|
|
|
$
|
6,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Financial
instruments and risk management
|
|
|
a)
|
Fair
value and classification of financial instruments
|
Based on the measurement categories set out in CICA Handbook
Section 3855, Financial Instruments Recognition and
Measurement, the Companys financial instruments are
classified as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents are classified as financial assets
held for trading and are recorded at fair value, with realized
and unrealized gains and losses reported in net income;
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and unbilled revenue are classified as loans
and receivables and are initially recorded at fair value and
subsequent to initial recognition are accounted for at amortized
cost using the effective interest method;
|
|
|
|
The Company has classified amounts due under its revolving
credit facility, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and
senior notes as other financial liabilities. Other financial
liabilities are accounted for on initial recognition at fair
value and subsequent to initial recognition at amortized cost
using the effective interest method with gains and losses
reported in net income in the period that the liability is
derecognized; and
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments, including non-financial
derivatives, are classified as held-for-trading and are measured
at fair value with realized and unrealized gains and losses on
derivatives recognized in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations, Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Deficit, unless
exempted from derivative treatment as a normal purchase or sale.
|
In determining the fair value of financial instruments, the
Company uses a variety of methods and assumptions that are based
on market conditions and risks existing on each reporting date.
Counterparty confirmations and standard market conventions and
techniques, such as discounted cash flow analysis and option
pricing models, are used to determine the fair value of the
Companys financial instruments, including derivatives. All
methods of fair value measurement result in a general
approximation of value and such value may never actually be
realized.
The fair values of the Companys accounts receivable,
unbilled revenue, accounts payable and accrued liabilities
approximate their carrying amounts due to the relatively short
periods to maturity for the instruments.
The fair values of amounts due under the revolving credit
facility and capital leases are based on management estimates
which are determined by discounting cash flows required under
the instruments at the interest rate currently estimated to be
available for loans with similar terms. Based on these
estimates, the fair value of amounts due under the revolving
credit facility and capital leases as at June 30, 2008 and
March 31, 2008 are not significantly different than their
carrying values.
11
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The fair values of the Companys cross-currency and
interest rate swap agreements are based on values quoted by the
counterparties to the agreements. The fair values of the
Companys embedded derivatives are based on appropriate
price modeling commonly used by market participants to estimate
fair value. Such modeling includes option pricing models and
discounted cash flow analysis, using observable market based
inputs to estimate fair value. Fair value determined using
valuation models requires the use of assumptions concerning the
amount and timing of future cash flows. Fair value amounts
reflect managements best estimates using external readily
observable market data such as future prices, interest rate
yield curves, foreign exchange rates and discount rates for time
value. It is possible that the assumption used in establishing
fair value amounts will differ from future outcomes and the
impact of such variations could be material.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Asset (Liability)
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes(i)
|
|
|
(195,613
|
)
|
|
|
(205,757
|
)
|
|
|
(198,245
|
)
|
|
|
(209,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
The fair value of the US $ denominated
83/4% senior
notes is based upon their period end closing market price as at
June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008. |
Derivative financial instruments that are used for risk
management purposes, as described in Note 10(b)
under Risk Management consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Senior
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
Instruments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Cross-currency and interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
80,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded price escalation features in a long-term revenue
construction contract
|
|
|
14,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded price escalation features in a long-term supplier
contract
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded prepayment and early redemption options on senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
95,781
|
|
|
|
(5,246
|
)
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
4,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,978
|
|
|
|
(5,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Senior
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
Instruments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Cross-currency and interest rate swaps
|
|
|
81,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded price escalation features in a long-term revenue
construction contract
|
|
|
14,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded price escalation features in a long-term supplier
contract
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded prepayment and early redemption options on senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
97,739
|
|
|
|
(4,270
|
)
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
4,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,019
|
|
|
|
(4,270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The realized and unrealized gain/loss on derivative financial
instruments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
(Restated - Note 4)
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized (gain) loss on cross-currency and
interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(454
|
)
|
|
|
14,321
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on embedded price escalation features in
a long-term revenue construction contract
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
6,001
|
|
Unrealized gain on embedded price escalation features in a
long-term supplier contract
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
(2,435
|
)
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on embedded prepayment and early
redemption options on senior notes
|
|
|
(976
|
)
|
|
|
3,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,265
|
)
|
|
|
21,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is exposed to market, credit and liquidity risks
associated with its financial instruments. The Company will from
time to time use various financial instruments to reduce market
risk exposures from changes in foreign currency exchange rates
and interest rates. The Company does not hold or use any
derivatives instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Overall, the Companys Board of Directors has
responsibility for the establishment and approval of the
Companys risk management policies. Management performs a
risk assessment on a continual basis to ensure that all
significant risks related to the Company and its operations have
been reviewed and assessed to reflect changes in market
conditions and the Companys operating activities.
Market
Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss that results from changes in
market factors such as foreign currency exchange rates and
interest rates. The level of market risk to which the Company is
exposed at any point in time varies depending on market
conditions, expectations of future price or market rate
movements and composition of the Companys financial assets
and liabilities held, non-trading physical assets and contract
portfolios.
To manage the exposure related to changes in market risk, the
Company uses various risk management techniques including the
use of derivative instruments. Such instruments may be used to
establish a fixed price for a commodity, an interest-bearing
obligation or a cash flow dominated in a foreign currency.
Market risk exposures are monitored regularly and tolerances and
control processes are in place to monitor that only authorized
activities are undertaken.
The sensitivities provided below are hypothetical and should not
be considered to be predictive of future performance or
indicative of earnings on these contracts.
The Company has
83/4% senior
notes denominated in U.S. dollars in the amount of
US$200 million. In order to reduce its exposure to changes
in the U.S. to Canadian dollar exchange rate, the Company
entered into a cross-currency swap agreement to manage this
foreign currency exposure for both the principal balance due on
December 1, 2011 as well as the semi-annual interest
payments from the issue date to the maturity date. In
conjunction with the cross-currency swap agreement, the Company
also entered into a U.S. dollar interest rate swap and a
Canadian dollar interest rate swap as discussed in
note 10(b)(ii) below. These derivative financial
instruments
13
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
were not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. At
June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, the notional
principal amount of the cross-currency swaps was
US$200 million.
The Company also regularly transacts in foreign currencies when
purchasing equipment, spare parts as well as certain general and
administrative goods and services. These exposures are generally
of a short-term nature and the impact of changes in exchange
rates has not been significant in the past. The Company attempts
to fix its exposure in either the Canadian dollar or the
U.S. dollar for these short-term transactions, if material.
With other variables unchanged, a 100 basis point increase
(decrease) of the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar related to
the U.S. dollar denominated senior notes would decrease
(increase) net income by approximately $1.7 million. With
other variables unchanged, a 100 basis point increase (decrease)
in the Canadian to the U.S. dollar related to the cross-currency
swap would increase (decrease) net income by approximately
$1.9 million. The impact on short-term exposures would be
insignificant. There would be no impact to other comprehensive
income.
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk from the
possibility that changes in the interest rates will affect
future cash flows or the fair values of its financial
instruments. Amounts outstanding under the Companys
revolving credit facility are subject to a floating rate. The
Companys senior notes are subject to a fixed rate.
In some circumstances, floating rate funding may be used for
short-term borrowings and other liquidity requirements. The
Company may use derivative instruments to manage interest rate
risk.
In conjunction with the cross-currency swap agreement discussed
in note 10(b)(i) above, the Company also entered into a
U.S. dollar interest rate swap and a Canadian dollar
interest rate swap with the net effect of economically
converting the 8.75% rate payable on the
83/4% senior
notes into a fixed rate of 9.765% for the duration that the
83/4% senior
notes are outstanding. On May 19, 2005 in connection with
the Companys new revolving credit facility at that time,
this fixed rate was increased to 9.889%. These derivative
financial instruments were not designated as a hedge for
accounting purposes.
At June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, the notional
principal amounts of the interest rate swaps were
US$200 million and Canadian $263 million.
As at June 30, 2008, holding all other variables constant,
a 1% increase (decrease) to Canadian interest rates would impact
the fair value of the interest rate swaps by $7,038 with this
change in fair value being recorded in net income. As at
June 30, 2008, holding all other variables constant, a 1%
increase (decrease) to US interest rates would impact the fair
value of the interest rate swaps by $3,292 with this change in
fair value being recorded in net income. As at June 30,
2008, holding all other variables constant, a 1% increase
(decrease) of Canadian to US interest rate volatility would
impact the fair value of the interest rate swaps by $2,105 with
this change in fair value being recorded in net income.
At June 30, 2008 the Company did not hold any floating rate
debt. As at June 30, 2008, holding all other variables
constant, a 1% increase (decrease) to interest rates would not
have an impact on net income or other comprehensive income. This
assumes that the amount and mix of fixed and floating rate debt
remains unchanged from that which was held at June 30, 2008.
As at June 30, 2008 the Company is party to an interim
financing agreement related to the manufacture of a piece of
heavy equipment. While the equipment is under construction, the
progress payments made to the manufacturer by the third party
finance company are subject to a floating interest rate. This
borrowing cost will be capitalized by the third party finance
company until the equipment is commissioned, which is expected
to be November 1, 2008. This borrowing cost will be
factored into the Companys future operating lease
payments. A 1% increase (decrease) in interest rates would
result in an insignificant increase (decrease) to the borrowing
cost which
14
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
will be capitalized by the third party finance company. This
additional (reduced) cost will impact the Companys net
income through the increased (reduced) operating lease payments
in future periods.
iii. Credit
Risk
Credit risk is the financial loss to the Company if a customer
or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its
contractual obligations. The Company manages the credit risk
associated with its cash by holding its funds with reputable
financial institutions. The Company is exposed to credit risk
through its accounts receivable and unbilled revenue. Credit
risk for trade and other accounts receivables, and unbilled
revenue are managed through established credit monitoring
activities.
The Company has a concentration of customers in the oil and gas
sector. The concentration risk is mitigated by the customers
being large investment grade organizations. The credit
worthiness of new customers is subject to review by management
by considering such items as the type of customer and the size
of the contract.
At June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, the following
customers represented 10% or more of accounts receivable and
unbilled revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Customer A
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Customer B
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Customer C
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Customer D
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Customer E
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
The Company reviews its accounts receivable accounts regularly
and amounts are written down to their expected realizable value
when outstanding amounts are determined not to be fully
collectible. This generally occurs when the customer has
indicated an inability to pay, the Company is unable to
communicate with the customer over an extended period of time,
and other methods to obtain payment have been considered and
have not been successful. Bad debt expense is charged to net
income in the period that the account is determined to be
doubtful. Estimates of the allowance for doubtful accounts are
determined on a
customer-by-customer
evaluation of collectability at each reporting date taking into
consideration the following factors: the length of time the
receivable has been outstanding, specific knowledge of each
customers financial condition and historical experience.
The Companys maximum exposure to credit risk for trade
accounts receivable is the carrying value of $121,448 as at
June 30, 2008 (March 31, 2008 $157,237),
other receivables is the carrying value of $6,106
(March 31, 2008 $8,765) and unbilled revenue is
the carrying value of $89,533 as at June 30, 2008
(March 31, 2008 $70,883). On a geographic basis
as at June 30, 2008, approximately 95% (March 31,
2008 89%) of the balance of trade accounts
receivable (before considering the allowance for doubtful
accounts) was due from customers based in Western Canada.
15
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Payment terms are generally net 30 days. As at
June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008 trade receivables are
aged as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Not past due
|
|
$
|
75,986
|
|
|
$
|
124,211
|
|
Past due 1-30 days
|
|
|
19,362
|
|
|
|
19,790
|
|
Past due
31-60 days
|
|
|
18,610
|
|
|
|
1,896
|
|
More than 61 days
|
|
|
7,490
|
|
|
|
11,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
121,448
|
|
|
|
157,237
|
|
As at June 30, 2008, the Company has recorded an allowance
for doubtful accounts of $751 (March 31, 2008
$742) of which 100% relates to amounts that are more than
61 days past due.
The allowance is an estimate of the June 30, 2008 trade
receivable balances that are considered uncollectible. Changes
to the allowance during the three months ended June 30,
2008 consisted of payments received on outstanding balances of
$68 (three months ended June 30, 2007 $nil),
write off of trade accounts receivable balances not collected of
$nil (three months ended June 30, 2007 - $nil), and bad
debt expense of $77 (three months ended June 30,
2007 $nil).
Credit risk on cross-currency and interest rate swap agreements
arises from the possibility that the counterparties to the
agreements may default on their respective obligations under the
agreements. This credit risk only arises in instances where
these agreements have positive fair value for the Company.
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to
meet its financial obligations as they become due. The Company
manages liquidity risk through management of its capital
structure and financial leverage, as outlined in note 11 to
the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. It also
manages liquidity risk by continuously monitoring actual and
projected cash flows to ensure that it will always have
sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under
both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring
unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Companys
reputation. The Company believes that forecasted cash flows from
operating activities, along with the available lines of credit,
will provide sufficient cash requirements to cover the
Companys forecasted normal operating and budgeted capital
expenditures.
The Companys principal sources of cash are funds from
operations and borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
Our revolving credit facility contains covenants that restrict
our activities, including, but not limited to, incurring
additional debt, transferring or selling assets and, making
investments including acquisitions. Under the revolving credit
agreement Consolidated Capital Expenditures during any
applicable period cannot exceed 120% of the amount in the
capital expenditure plan. In addition, we are required to
satisfy certain financial covenants, including a minimum
interest coverage ratio and a maximum senior leverage ratio,
both of which are calculated using Consolidated EBITDA as
defined in the revolving credit agreement, as well as a minimum
current ratio.
At June 30, 2008 the Company was in compliance with its
senior leverage, its interest coverage, and working capital
covenants.
16
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following are the undiscounted contractual maturities of
financial liabilities and other contractual commitments measured
at period end exchange rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Cash Flows
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1 - 3 Years
|
|
|
3 - 5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
178,603
|
|
|
|
178,603
|
|
|
|
178,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations (including interest)
|
|
|
14,715
|
|
|
|
16,509
|
|
|
|
5,606
|
|
|
|
7,977
|
|
|
|
2,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
195,612
|
|
|
|
203,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,543
|
|
|
|
11,506
|
|
|
|
46,025
|
|
|
|
23,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency and interest rate swaps
|
|
|
80,527
|
|
|
|
73,485
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
5,991
|
|
|
|
65,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
469,457
|
|
|
|
552,860
|
|
|
|
197,213
|
|
|
|
59,993
|
|
|
|
295,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys objectives in managing capital are to ensure
sufficient liquidity to pursue its strategy of organic growth
combined with strategic acquisitions and to provide returns to
its shareholders. The Company defines capital that it manages as
the aggregate of its debt and shareholders equity, which
is comprised of issued capital, contributed surplus, accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) and retained earnings
(deficit). The Company manages its capital structure and makes
adjustments to it in light of general economic conditions, the
risk characteristics of the underlying assets and the
Companys working capital requirements. In order to
maintain or adjust its capital structure, the Company, upon
approval from its Board of Directors, may issue or repay
long-term debt, issue shares, repurchase shares through a normal
course issuer bid, pay dividends or undertake other activities
as deemed appropriate under the specific circumstances. The
Board of Directors reviews and approves any material
transactions out of the ordinary course of business, including
proposals on acquisitions or other major investments or
divestitures, as well as capital and operating budgets.
The Company monitors debt leverage ratios as part of the
management of liquidity and shareholders return and to
sustain future development of the business. The Company is also
subject to externally imposed capital requirements under its
revolving credit facility and indenture agreement governing the
U.S. dollar denominated
83/4% senior
notes, which contains certain restrictive covenants including,
but not limited to, incurring additional debt, transferring or
selling assets, making investments including acquisitions or to
pay dividends or redeem shares of capital stock. The
Companys overall strategy with respect to capital risk
management remains unchanged from the year ended March 31,
2008.
The Company is subject to restrictive covenants under its
banking agreements with its principal lenders related to its
revolving credit facility (note 6(a)), its capital lease
obligations and senior notes (note 6(b)) that are measured
on a quarterly basis. These covenants include, but are not
limited to a working capital ratio, senior leverage ratio, and
interest coverage ratio.
17
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
a)
|
Supplemental
cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
13,468
|
|
|
$
|
13,397
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Cash received during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of plant and equipment by means of capital leases
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Lease inducements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
b)
|
Net
change in non-cash working capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
38,439
|
|
|
$
|
(17,342
|
)
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled revenue
|
|
|
(18,650
|
)
|
|
|
25,804
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(5,407
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and deposits
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
3,684
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,703
|
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(8,038
|
)
|
|
|
(8,870
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(15,053
|
)
|
|
|
(4,806
|
)
|
Billings in excess of costs incurred and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
7,556
|
|
|
|
2,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,265
|
|
|
$
|
4,764
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
43,473
|
|
|
$
|
(4,358
|
)
|
Income tax expense as a percentage of income before income taxes
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 differs from the
statutory rate of 29.38% primarily due to the benefit from
changes in the timing of the reversal of temporary differences.
Income tax as a percentage of income before income taxes for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 differed from the
statutory rate of 31.72% primarily due to the impact of the
enacted rate changes during the period and the impact of new
accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of
financial instruments as certain embedded derivatives are
considered capital in nature for income tax purposes.
18
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Segmented
information
|
The Company operates in the following reportable business
segments, which follow the organization, management and
reporting structure within the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy Construction and Mining:
|
The Heavy Construction and Mining segment provides mining and
site preparation services, including overburden removal and
reclamation services, project management and underground utility
construction, to a variety of customers throughout Canada.
The Piling segment provides deep foundation construction and
design build services to a variety of industrial and commercial
customers throughout Western Canada.
The Pipeline segment provides both small and large diameter
pipeline construction and installation services to energy and
industrial clients throughout Western Canada.
Certain business units of the Company have been aggregated into
the Heavy Construction and Mining segment as they have similar
economic characteristics. These business units are considered to
have similar economic characteristics based on similarities in
the nature of the services provided, the customer base and the
similarities in the production process and the resources used to
provide these services.
|
|
b)
|
Results
by business segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
and Mining
|
|
|
Piling
|
|
|
Pipeline
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
189,405
|
|
|
$
|
42,503
|
|
|
$
|
27,079
|
|
|
$
|
258,987
|
|
Depreciation of plant and equipment
|
|
|
5,223
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
6,270
|
|
Segment profits
|
|
|
21,402
|
|
|
|
8,661
|
|
|
|
8,925
|
|
|
|
38,988
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
529,431
|
|
|
|
123,108
|
|
|
|
74,975
|
|
|
|
727,514
|
|
Expenditures for segment plant and equipment
|
|
|
48,842
|
|
|
|
5,830
|
|
|
|
4,649
|
|
|
|
59,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
and Mining
|
|
|
Piling
|
|
|
Pipeline
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
126,914
|
|
|
$
|
35,522
|
|
|
$
|
5,191
|
|
|
$
|
167,627
|
|
Depreciation of plant and equipment
|
|
|
4,320
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
Segment profits
|
|
|
19,489
|
|
|
|
9,247
|
|
|
|
(1,189
|
)
|
|
|
27,547
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
438,030
|
|
|
|
104,981
|
|
|
|
51,683
|
|
|
|
594,694
|
|
Expenditures for segment plant and equipment
|
|
|
7,677
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
8,399
|
|
19
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
i.
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
note 4)
|
|
|
Total profit for reportable segments
|
|
$
|
38,988
|
|
|
$
|
27,547
|
|
Unallocated corporate expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
(19,215
|
)
|
|
|
(14,627
|
)
|
Loss on disposal of plant and equipment
|
|
|
(1,144
|
)
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
Loss on disposal of assets held for sale
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(316
|
)
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(6,449
|
)
|
|
|
(6,809
|
)
|
Foreign exchange gain
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
17,100
|
|
Realized and unrealized loss (gain) on derivative financial
instruments
|
|
|
2,265
|
|
|
|
(21,514
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Unallocated equipment recovery & (costs)(1)
|
|
|
8,601
|
|
|
|
(12,643
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
24,405
|
|
|
$
|
(11,493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unallocated equipment costs represent actual equipment costs,
including non-cash items such as depreciation, which have not
been allocated to reportable segments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total assets for reportable segments
|
|
$
|
727,514
|
|
|
$
|
698,966
|
|
Corporate assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
51,332
|
|
|
|
32,871
|
|
Plant & equipment
|
|
|
28,828
|
|
|
|
26,785
|
|
Future income taxes
|
|
|
19,452
|
|
|
|
26,416
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10,596
|
|
|
|
8,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total corporate assets
|
|
|
110,208
|
|
|
|
94,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
837,722
|
|
|
$
|
793,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys goodwill was assigned to the Heavy
Construction and Mining, Piling and Pipeline segments in the
amounts of $125,447, $41,872, and $32,753, respectively.
All of the Companys assets are located in Canada and the
activities are carried out throughout the year.
|
|
iii.
|
Depreciation
of plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Total depreciation for reportable segments
|
|
$
|
6,270
|
|
|
$
|
5,275
|
|
Depreciation for corporate assets
|
|
|
1,888
|
|
|
|
3,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation
|
|
|
8,158
|
|
|
|
8,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following customers accounted for 10% or more of total
revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Customer A
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
Customer B
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Customer C
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Customer D
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
The revenue by major customer was earned in the Heavy
Construction and Mining, Piling and Pipeline segments.
|
|
14.
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
Share
option plan
Under the 2004 Amended and Restated Share Option Plan,
directors, officers, employees and certain service providers to
the Company are eligible to receive stock options to acquire
voting common shares in the Company. Each stock option provides
the right to acquire one common share in the Company and expires
ten years from the grant date or on termination of employment.
Options may be exercised at a price determined at the time the
option is awarded, and vest as follows: no options vest on the
award date and twenty percent vest on each subsequent
anniversary date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
($ per Share)
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
($ per Share)
|
|
|
Outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
2,036,364
|
|
|
$
|
7.54
|
|
|
|
2,146,840
|
|
|
$
|
6.03
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(107,000
|
)
|
|
|
(6.32
|
)
|
|
|
(147,400
|
)
|
|
|
(5.00
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(101,000
|
)
|
|
|
(10.58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
1,828,364
|
|
|
$
|
7.44
|
|
|
|
1,999,440
|
|
|
$
|
6.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008, the weighted average remaining
contractual life of outstanding options is 7.6 years
(March 31, 2008 7.6 years). The Company
recorded $254 of compensation expense related to the stock
options in the three months ended June 30, 2008
(2007 $359) with such amount being credited to
contributed surplus.
Deferred
performance share unit plan
On March 19, 2008, the Company approved a Deferred
Performance Share Unit (DPSU) Plan which became
effective April 1, 2008.
DPSUs will be granted effective April 1 of each fiscal year in
respect of services to be provided in that fiscal year and the
following two fiscal years. The DPSUs vest at the end of a
three-year term and are subject to the performance criteria
approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
at the date of grant. Such performance criterion includes the
passage of time and is based upon return on invested capital
calculated on operating income and average operating assets. The
date of the third fiscal year-end following the date of the
grant of DPSUs shall be the Maturity Date for such
DPSUs. At the maturity date the Compensation Committee shall
21
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
assess the participant against the performance criteria and
determine the number of DPSUs that have been earned (earned
DPSUs).
The settlement of the participants entitlement shall be
made in either cash at the value of the earned DPSUs equivalent
to the number of earned DPSUs at the value of the Companys
voting shares at the date of maturity or in a number of common
shares equal to the number of earned DPSUs. If settled in common
shares, the common shares shall be purchased on the open market
or through the issuance of shares from treasury, subject to
shareholder approval.
The fair value of each unit under the DPSU Plan was estimated on
the date of the grant using Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The weighted average assumptions used in estimating the fair
value of the share options issued under the DPSU Plan at
April 1, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Number of options granted
|
|
|
111,020
|
|
Weighted average fair value per option granted ($)
|
|
|
12.34
|
|
Weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
nil
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
56.25
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.83
|
%
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
At June 30, 2008, the weighted average remaining
contractual life of outstanding DPSUs is 2.75 years. For
the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company granted
111,020 under the Plan and recorded compensation expense of $113
included in general and administrative costs. As at
June 30, 2008, there was approximately $1,256 of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based
payment arrangements under the DPSU Plan, which is expected to
be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.75 years.
Directors
deferred stock unit plan
On November 27, 2007, the Company approved a
Directors Deferred Stock Unit (DDSU) Plan,
which became effective January 1, 2008. Under the DDSU
Plan, non-employee or officer directors of the Company shall
receive 50% of their annual fixed remuneration (which is
included in general and administrative expenses in the
consolidated statement of operations) in the form of DDSUs and
may elect to receive all or a part of their annual fixed
remuneration in excess of 50% in the form of DDSUs. The DDSUs
vest immediately upon grant and are redeemable, in cash, equal
to the difference between the market value of the Companys
common stock at maturity and the market value of the
Companys common stock on the grant date (maturity occurs
when the director resigns or retires). DDSUs must be redeemed
within 60 days following maturity. Directors, who are not
US taxpayers, may elect to defer the maturity date until a date
no later than December 1st of the calendar year
following the year in which the actual maturity date occurred.
As at June 30, 2008, an expense of $269 (June 30,
2007 $nil) was recorded relating to 20,774
(March 31, 2008 11,882) outstanding units that
were granted during the year.
The Company generally experiences a decline in revenues during
the first quarter of each fiscal year due to seasonality, as
weather conditions make operations in the Companys
operating regions difficult during this period. The level of
activity in the Heavy Construction and Mining and Pipeline
segments declines when frost leaves the ground and many
secondary roads are temporarily rendered incapable of supporting
the weight of heavy equipment. The duration of this period is
referred to as spring breakup and has a direct
impact on the Companys activity levels. Revenues during
the fourth quarter of each fiscal year are typically highest as
ground conditions are most
22
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Notes to
the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
favorable in the Companys operating regions. As a result,
full-year results are not likely to be a direct multiple of any
particular quarter or combination of quarters.
At June 30, 2008, in connection with a heavy equipment
financing agreement, the Company has guaranteed
$4.5 million of debt owed to the equipment manufacturer by
a third party finance company. The Companys guarantee of
this indebtedness will expire when the equipment is
commissioned, which is expected to be November 1, 2008. The
Company has determined that the fair value of this financial
instrument at inception and June 30, 2008 was not
significant.
On June 25, 2008, the Company reached an agreement with a
customer to settle all outstanding claims arising from a
pipeline project completed in fiscal 2008 for $8,000. The
Company had previously recognized claims revenue of $2,744
related to such outstanding claims as at March 31, 2008 and
it has recognized the excess of the settlement over previously
recognized claims revenue of $5,256 as revenue in the quarter
ended June 30, 2008.
The comparative consolidated financial statements have been
reclassified from statements previously presented to conform to
the presentation of the current year consolidated financial
statements.
23
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis
For the three months ended June 30, 2008
The following discussion and analysis is as of
August 13, 2008 and should be read in conjunction with the
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 and the audited
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2008. These statements have been prepared in
accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) and, except where otherwise specifically
indicated, all dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars.
The consolidated financial statements and additional information
relating to our business are available on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
August 13, 2008
Table of
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject
|
|
Page
|
|
|
A.
|
|
|
BUSINESS OVERVIEW AND STRATEGY
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Overview
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Oil Sands
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Sands Outlook
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
B.
|
|
|
FINANCIAL RESULTS
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Results (Three Months)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of Results
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Results (Three Months)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Position
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims and Change Orders
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
C.
|
|
|
KEY TRENDS
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seasonality
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Sources
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Suppliers
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competition
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
D.
|
|
|
OUTLOOK
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
E.
|
|
|
LEGAL AND LABOUR MATTERS
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laws and Regulations and Environmental Matters
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees and Labour Relations
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
F.
|
|
|
RESOURCES AND SYSTEMS
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Share Data
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow and Capital Resources
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Commitments
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Requirements
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal Systems and Processes
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Accounting Policies
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Parties
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recently Adopted Accounting Policies
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
G.
|
|
|
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION AND RISK FACTORS
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward-Looking Information
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
H.
|
|
|
GENERAL MATTERS
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
History and Development of the Company
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Information
|
|
|
33
|
|
1
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
Prior
Year Comparisons
In preparing the financial statements for the year ended
March 31, 2008, we determined that the previously issued
interim unaudited consolidated financial statements for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 did not properly account
for an embedded derivative with respect to price escalation
features in a supplier maintenance contract.
The embedded derivative has been measured at fair value and
included in derivative financial instruments on the consolidated
balance sheet with changes in fair value recognized in net
income. The impact of this restatement on the Interim
Consolidated Balance Sheet for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 is an immaterial change to future income
taxes (long-term assets), derivative financial instruments and
retained earnings (all adjustments less than $0.1 million).
The impact on the interim consolidated financial statements for
the three months ended June 30, 2007 is an adjustment to
unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments and income
tax expense. This resulted in an improvement to net income of
$1.7 million (restated as a loss of $8.6 million)
|
|
A.
|
Business
Overview and Strategy
|
Business
Overview
We are a leading resource services provider to major oil,
natural gas and other natural resource companies, with a primary
focus on the Alberta oil sands. We provide a wide range of heavy
construction and mining, piling and pipeline installation
services to our customers across the entire lifecycle of their
projects. We are the largest provider of contract mining
services in the oil sands area and we believe we are one of the
largest piling foundations installer in Western Canada. In
addition, we believe that we operate the largest fleet of
equipment of any contract resource services provider in the oil
sands. Our total fleet includes over 845 pieces of diversified
heavy construction equipment supported by over 925 ancillary
vehicles. While our expertise covers heavy earth moving, site
preparation, underground industrial piping, piling and pipeline
installation in any location, we have a specific capability
operating in the harsh climate and difficult terrain of the oil
sands and northern Canada.
We believe that our significant knowledge, experience, equipment
capacity and scale of operations in the oil sands differentiate
us from our competition. We provide services to every company in
the Alberta oil sands that uses surface mining techniques in
their production. These surface mining techniques account for
over 65% of total oil sands production. We also provide site
construction services for in-situ producers, which use
horizontally drilled wells to inject steam into deposits and
pump bitumen to the surface.
Our principal oil sands customers include all three of the
producers that are currently mining bitumen in Alberta: Syncrude
Canada Ltd. (Syncrude), Suncor Energy Inc. (Suncor) and Albian
Sands Energy Inc. (Albian), a joint venture amongst Shell Canada
Limited, Chevron Canada Limited and Marathon Oil Canada
Corporation. We are also working with customers that are in the
process of developing bitumen-mining projects, including
Canadian Natural Resources Limited (Canadian Natural) and
Fort Hills (a joint venture between UTS Energy, Teck
Cominco and Petro-Canada).
We have long-term relationships with most of our customers. For
example, we have been providing services to Syncrude and Suncor
since they pioneered oil sands development over 30 years
ago. Approximately 39% of our revenues in fiscal 2008 were
derived from recurring work and long-term contracts, which
assist in providing stability in our operations.
We believe that we have demonstrated our ability to successfully
export knowledge and technology gained in the oil sands and put
it to work in other resource development projects across Canada.
As an example, our Heavy Construction and Mining division
successfully completed the development of a diamond mine site in
2008. This three-year project required us to operate effectively
in a remote location under difficult weather conditions. As a
2
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
result of our successful work on this project, we believe we
have attracted the attention of resource developers and we are
currently looking at other potential projects, including those
in the high arctic regions.
Our piling division installs all types of driven, drilled and
screw piles, caissons, earth retention and stabilization
systems. Operating throughout Western Canada, this division has
a solid record of performance on both small and large- scale
projects. Our piling division also has experience with
industrial projects in the oil sands and related petrochemical
and refinery complexes and has been involved in the development
of commercial and infrastructure projects.
Our Pipeline division installs penstocks as well as steel,
fiberglass, and plastic pipe in sizes up to 52 in
diameter. This division is experienced with jobs of varying
magnitude for some of Canadas largest energy companies.
Our experience includes the recent construction of a new
pipeline that goes through the Rocky Mountains, from Alberta to
British Columbia. Undertaken as part of Kinder Morgans
Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX), this project involves the
construction of a 160 kilometer pipeline through ecologically
sensitive environments, including Jasper National Park, with
minimal impact to the environment.
Canadian
Oil Sands
Oil sands are grains of sand covered by a thin layer of water
and coated by heavy oil, or bitumen. Bitumen, because of its
structure, does not flow, and therefore requires
non-conventional extraction techniques to separate it from the
sand and other foreign matter. There are currently two main
methods of extraction: open pit mining, where bitumen deposits
are sufficiently close to the surface to make it economically
viable to recover the bitumen by treating mined sand in a
surface plant; and in-situ, where bitumen deposits are buried
too deep for open pit mining to be cost effective, and operators
instead inject steam into the deposit so that the bitumen can be
separated from the sand and pumped to the surface. We currently
provide most of our services to companies operating open pit
mines to recover bitumen reserves. These customers utilize our
services for surface mining, site preparation, overburden
removal, piling, pipe installation, site maintenance, equipment
and labor supply and land reclamation.
Oil
Sands Outlook
Demand for our services is primarily driven by the development,
expansion and operation of oils sands projects. The oils sands
operators capital investment decisions are driven by a
number of factors, with what we believe is one of the most
important being the expected long-term price of oil. The
development, expansion and operation of oils sands projects and
related public infrastructure spending play a key role in
influencing our business activities.
On October 25, 2007, the Alberta government announced
increases to the Alberta royalty rates affecting natural gas,
conventional oil and oil sands producers. The announced
increases were significant but lower than increases recommended
to the government by the Royalty Review Panel. While some of our
customers have announced their intentions to reduce oil and gas
investment in Alberta as a result of the increased royalties, to
date, the areas affected by these investment reductions do not
include oil sands mining projects. Given the long-term nature
and capital investment requirement to develop an oil sands
mining operation, we anticipate that there is limited risk that
the royalty changes will cause our customers to cancel, delay or
reduce the scope of any significant mining developments
currently underway.*
We are continuing to experience increasing requests for services
under existing contracts with our major oil sands customers in
spite of the recent royalty changes. Our recent acquisitions of
new equipment ideally suited to heavy earth moving in the oil
sands area, together with the addition of a significant number
of new employees, has
* This paragraph
contains forward-looking statements. Please refer to
Forward-Looking Information and Risk Factors for a
discussion on the risks and uncertainties related to such
information.
3
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
strengthened our ability to bid competitively and profitably
into this expanding market and we have secured contracts on many
of these new projects.
According to the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers
(CAPP), approximately $55.2 billion was invested in the oil
sands from 1998 through 2006. According to the Canadian Energy
Research Institutes (CERI) November 2007 report,
Canadian Oil Sands Supply Costs and Development Projects
(2007 2027), an additional $228 billion
of capital expenditures will be required between 2007 and 2015
to achieve production levels projected under their
constrained scenario. According to the CERI, as of
November 2007, there were 23 mining and upgrader projects in
various stages, ranging from announcement to construction, with
start-up
dates through 2014. Beyond 2014, several new multi-billion
dollar projects and a number of smaller multimillion dollar
projects are being considered by various oil sands operators. We
intend to pursue business opportunities from these projects.*
Strategy
Our strategy is to be an integrated service provider for the
developers of resource-based industries in a broad and often
challenging range of environments. This strategy is focused on
the following priorities:
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalize on growth opportunities in the Alberta oil
sands: We intend to build on our market
leadership position and successful track record with our
customers to benefit from any continued growth in this market.
We intend to increase our fleet size to be ready to meet the
challenges from the projected growth opportunities in oil sands
development.*
|
|
|
|
Leverage our complementary services: Our
complementary service segments, including site preparation,
pipeline installation, piling and other mining services allow us
to compete for many different forms of business. We intend to
build on our
first-in
position to cross-sell our other services and pursue selective
acquisition opportunities that expand our complementary service
offerings.*
|
|
|
|
Increase our recurring revenue base: We
provide services both during the construction phase and once the
project is in operation. Many of the services provided once the
project is in operation, including overburden removal,
reclamation, road construction and maintenance and mining
services are recurring in nature and provide more stable
recurring revenues. It is our intention to continue the
expansion of our business in these areas to provide a larger,
more stable revenue base in the future.*
|
|
|
|
Leverage our long- term relationships with
customers: Several of our oil sands customers
have announced intentions to increase their production capacity
by expanding the infrastructure at their sites. We intend to
continue to build on our relationships with these and other
existing oil sands customers to win a substantial share of the
heavy construction and mining, piling and pipeline services
outsourced in connection with these projects.*
|
|
|
|
Increase our presence outside the oil
sands: We intend to increase our presence outside
the oil sands and extend our services to other resource
industries across Canada. Canada has significant natural
resources and we believe that we have the equipment and the
experience to assist with developing those natural resources.*
|
|
|
|
Enhance operating efficiencies to improve revenues and
margins: We aim to increase the availability and
efficiency of our equipment through enhanced maintenance,
providing the opportunity for improved revenue, margins and
profitability.*
|
* This paragraph
contains forward-looking statements. Please refer to
Forward-Looking Information and Risk Factors for a
discussion on the risks and uncertainties related to such
information.
4
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
Operations
As discussed above we provide our services through three
interrelated yet distinct business units: (i) Heavy
Construction and Mining, (ii) Piling and
(iii) Pipeline. Our services include initial advice and
consulting to customers as they develop plans to exploit
resources. We believe that we have the skills and equipment to
build infrastructure in new locations or to expand existing
sites for heavy construction projects. We are currently involved
in assisting with
on-site
mining services, overburden removal and plant upgrades. We are
also able to respond to customer needs for site reclamation
services once a sites resources are depleted.
The table below shows the revenues generated by each operating
segment for the three month periods ended June 30, 2006
through June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
(Q1-FY2009)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Q1-FY2008)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Q1-FY2007)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue by operating segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy Construction and Mining
|
|
$
|
189,405
|
|
|
|
73.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
126,914
|
|
|
|
75.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
111,387
|
|
|
|
80.7
|
%
|
Piling
|
|
|
42,503
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
35,522
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
23,276
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
Pipeline
|
|
|
27,079
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
5,191
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
3,437
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
258,987
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
167,627
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
138,100
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Results (Three Months)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
% of
|
|
2007
|
|
% of
|
|
|
(Q1-FY2009)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
(Q1-FY2008)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share information)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
258,987
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
167,627
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Project costs
|
|
|
148,631
|
|
|
|
57.4
|
%
|
|
|
94,673
|
|
|
|
56.5
|
%
|
Equipment costs
|
|
|
45,811
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
45,139
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
Equipment operating lease expense
|
|
|
8,798
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
3,935
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
8,158
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
8,976
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
47,589
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
|
|
14,904
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
General & administrative costs
|
|
|
19,215
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
14,627
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
26,930
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
19,096
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
(8,582
|
)
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)%
|
Per share information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) basic
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) diluted
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
39,290
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
Consolidated EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
36,727
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
9,670
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
(as defined within the revolving credit agreement)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
|
|
(1)
|
Non
GAAP Financial measures
|
The body of generally accepted accounting principles applicable
to us is commonly referred to as GAAP. A non-GAAP
financial measure is generally defined by the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) and by the Canadian securities
regulatory authorities as one that purports to measure
historical or future financial performance, financial position
or cash flows, but excludes or includes amounts that would not
be so adjusted in the most comparable GAAP measures. EBITDA is
calculated as net income (loss) before interest expense, income
taxes, depreciation and amortization. Consolidated EBITDA (as
defined within the revolving credit agreement) is a measure
defined by our revolving credit facility. This measure is
defined as EBITDA, excluding the effects of unrealized foreign
exchange gain or loss, realized and unrealized gain or loss on
derivative financial instruments, non-cash stock-based
compensation expense, gain or loss on disposal of plant and
equipment and certain other non-cash items included in the
calculation of net income (loss). We believe that EBITDA is a
meaningful measure of the performance of our business because it
excludes items, such as depreciation and amortization, interest
and taxes that are not directly related to the operating
performance of our business. Management reviews EBITDA to
determine whether plant and equipment are being allocated
efficiently. In addition, our revolving credit facility requires
us to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum
senior leverage ratio, which are calculated using Consolidated
EBITDA. Non-compliance with these financial covenants could
result in our being required to immediately repay all amounts
outstanding under our revolving credit facility. EBITDA and
Consolidated EBITDA are not measures of performance under
Canadian GAAP or U.S. GAAP and our computations of EBITDA
and Consolidated EBITDA may vary from others in our industry.
EBITDA and Consolidated EBITDA should not be considered as
alternatives to operating income or net income as measures of
operating performance or cash flows as measures of liquidity.
EBITDA and Consolidated EBITDA have important limitations as
analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as
substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under
Canadian GAAP or U.S. GAAP. For example, EBITDA and
Consolidated EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
do not reflect our cash expenditures or requirements for capital
expenditures or capital commitments;
|
|
|
|
do not reflect changes in our cash requirements for, our working
capital needs;
|
|
|
|
do not reflect the interest expense or the cash requirements
necessary to service interest or principal payments on our debt;
|
|
|
|
exclude tax payments that represent a reduction in cash
available to us; and
|
|
|
|
do not reflect any cash requirements for assets being
depreciated and amortized that may have to be replaced in the
future.
|
Consolidated EBITDA excludes unrealized foreign exchange gains
and losses and realized and unrealized gains and losses on
derivative financial instruments, which, in the case of
unrealized losses, may ultimately result in a liability that
will need to be paid and in the case of realized losses,
represents an actual use of cash during the period. The term
as defined within the revolving credit agreement
replaces the term per bank used in prior filings.
The definition of Consolidated EBITDA has not changed.
6
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
A reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA and Consolidated
EBITDA (as defined within the revolving credit agreement) is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Q1-FY2009 )
|
|
(Q1-FY2008)
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
19,096
|
|
|
$
|
(8,582
|
)
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6,449
|
|
|
|
6,809
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
5,309
|
|
|
|
(2,911
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
8,158
|
|
|
|
8,976
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
39,290
|
|
|
$
|
4,362
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) on senior notes
|
|
|
(1,831
|
)
|
|
|
(17,150
|
)
|
Realized and unrealized (gain) loss on derivative financial
instruments
|
|
|
(2,265
|
)
|
|
|
21,514
|
|
Loss on disposal of plant and equipment and assets held for sale
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
Director deferred stock unit compensation
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
|
|
$
|
36,727
|
|
|
$
|
9,670
|
|
(as defined within the revolving credit agreement)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis
of Results:
Revenues of $259.0 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 (first quarter fiscal 2009) were
$91.4 million (or 55%) higher than in the same period last
year. Strong revenue performance in Heavy Construction and
Mining (up $62.5 million) together with higher Pipeline
revenue as a result of the TMX project (up $21.9 million),
were key contributors to the year-over-year improvements.
First quarter gross profit increased to $47.6 million or
18.4% percent of revenue, compared to $14.9 million or 8.9%
of revenue in the prior year. In addition to the contribution of
increased revenue, the key factors in the
year-over-year
improvement included the return to profitability of the Pipeline
segment, a partial recovery of losses incurred on a pipeline
contract executed in fiscal 2007, lower repair and maintenance
costs and improvements to the management and purchasing of
tires. Increased activity levels have delayed the timing of
repairs costs to the second quarter. First quarter equipment
leasing costs of $8.8 million increased $4.9 million
year-over-year
reflecting the March 2008 commissioning of the new electric
cable shovel at our long-term overburden project together with
increased leasing of major capital equipment during the latter
part of fiscal 2008. Depreciation in the first quarter of fiscal
2008 included a $3.0 million charge for accelerated
depreciation for equipment that was being removed from service
compared to a $0.6 million similar charge in the first
quarter of fiscal 2009. General and administrative (G&A)
costs, as a percentage of revenue, dropped to 7.4% from 8.7% in
the prior year. The increase of $4.6 million in costs,
year-over-year,
was a result of the addition of new employees as we built
capacity to support our higher activity levels.
7
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
First quarter net income of $19.1 million increased by
$27.7 million compared to the same period in fiscal 2008.
The increase was driven by the stronger revenue and gross profit
combined with the positive net effects of non-operating items.
Basic earnings per share for the quarter were $0.53, compared to
a loss of $0.24 per share in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
Improvements in net income were enhanced by non-cash gains on
derivative financial instruments and foreign exchange of
$3.9 million, net of tax, compared to a negative impact of
$3.6 million, net of tax, in the first quarter of fiscal
2008. Excluding these items, basic earnings per share would have
been $0.42 per share for the first quarter of fiscal 2009
compared to a loss of $0.14 per share for the same period
in fiscal 2008.
Segment
Results (Three Months)
Segment profits include revenue earned from the performance of
our projects, including amounts arising from approved change
orders and claims that have met the appropriate accounting
criteria for recognition, less all direct project expenses,
including direct labour, short-term equipment rentals and
materials, payments to subcontractors, indirect job costs and
internal charges for use of capital equipment.
Heavy
Construction and Mining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
% of
|
|
2007
|
|
% of
|
|
|
(Q1-FY2009)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
(Q1-FY2008)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Segment revenue
|
|
$
|
189,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
126,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit
|
|
$
|
21,402
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
19,489
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
First quarter fiscal 2009 Heavy Construction and Mining revenues
of $189.4 million were $62.5 million higher than in
the same period in fiscal 2008. Strong demand for our site
services work was the primary factor in this improvement.
Construction work on the Suncor Voyageur and Millennium Naptha
Unit sites together with site preparation work on the Petro
Canada Fort Hills project added to revenues during the
period. Segment margins declined to 11.3% of revenues for the
current fiscal quarter, from 15.4% in the same quarter of fiscal
2008. Production challenges related to unfavourable haul road
conditions and site congestion at a single mining project
negatively affected segment margins during the period lessening
the effect of the higher-margin site services and site
preparation work in the project mix.
Piling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
% of
|
|
2007
|
|
% of
|
|
|
(Q1-FY2009)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
(Q1-FY2008)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Segment revenue
|
|
$
|
42,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit
|
|
$
|
8,661
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,247
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
First quarter fiscal 2009 piling revenues of $42.5 million
were $7.0 million better than in the same period in fiscal
2008. Major contracts for oil sands-related plant and upgrader
projects were a significant contributor to the revenue growth.
Delays in approval of change orders resulted in segment margin
declining to 20.4% from 26.0% year-over-year.
8
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
Pipeline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
% of
|
|
2007
|
|
% of
|
|
|
(Q1-FY2009)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
(Q1-FY2008)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Segment revenue
|
|
$
|
27,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit
|
|
$
|
8,925
|
|
|
|
33.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(1,189
|
)
|
|
|
(22.9
|
)%
|
The TMX project continued to drive revenue growth in the
Pipeline division during the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The
segment also benefited from the settlement of claims revenue of
$5.3 million related to losses incurred on a fixed-price
contract that negatively impacted the 2007 fiscal year. The
claims revenue, in part, increased segment profit to
$8.9 million (33.0% of revenue) compared to a
$1.2 million loss in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
Excluding the impact of the claim settlement, the margin for the
first quarter of fiscal 2009 was 16.3%.
Non-operating
expense (income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Q1-FY2009)
|
|
|
(Q1-FY2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on senior notes
|
|
$
|
5,834
|
|
|
$
|
5,834
|
|
Interest on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Amortization of bond issue costs and premiums
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
Other interest
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest expense
|
|
$
|
6,449
|
|
|
$
|
6,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange (gain) on senior notes
|
|
$
|
(1,641
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,100
|
)
|
Realized and unrealized (gain) loss on derivative financial
instruments
|
|
|
(2,265
|
)
|
|
|
21,514
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
Income tax (recovery) expense
|
|
|
5,309
|
|
|
|
(2,911
|
)
|
Total interest expense decreased by $0.4 million in the
first quarter of fiscal 2009, compared to the same period last
year, primarily due to the reduction in the amortization of bond
issue costs. The foreign exchange gains and losses recognized in
the current and prior-year periods primarily relate to changes
in the strength of the Canadian versus the U.S. dollar on
conversion of the US$200 million of
83/4% senior
notes. The value of the Canadian dollar relative to the
U.S. dollar remained relatively stable during the first
quarter period, with only a minimal increase from $0.9729 CAN/US
on March 31, 2008 to $0.9817 CAN/US on June 30, 2008.
By comparison, the exchange rate increased from $0.8667 CAN/US
on March 31, 2007 to $0.9481 CAN/US on June 30, 2007.
The realized and unrealized gains on derivative financial
instruments reflect changes in the fair value of the
cross-currency and interest rate swaps that we employ to provide
an economic hedge for our U.S. dollar denominated
83/4% senior
notes. Changes in the fair value of the swaps generally have an
offsetting effect to changes in the value of our
83/4% senior
notes (and resulting foreign exchange gains and losses), both
caused by variations in the Canadian/US foreign exchange rate.
However, the valuation of the derivative financial instruments
can also be impacted by changes in interest rates and the
remaining present value of scheduled interest payments on the
83/4% senior
notes. Interest payments occur in the first and third quarters
of each year until maturity.
Due to our first quarter fiscal 2008 adoption of the CICA
standards regarding financial instruments, realized and
unrealized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments
for the first quarter of both fiscal 2008 and 2009 include
changes in the fair value of derivatives embedded in our US$
denominated
83/4% senior
notes, in a long-term construction contract and in a supplier
maintenance agreement. The change in the realized and unrealized
value of
9
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
the cross-currency and interest swaps resulted in a gain of $0.5 million in
the fiscal 2009 first quarter period. The balance of the
realized and unrealized gains and losses on derivative financial
instruments resulted from gains on derivatives embedded in our
83/4% senior
notes, in a long-term construction contract and in the supplier
maintenance agreement.
With respect to the early redemption provision in the
83/4% senior
notes, the process to determine the fair value of the implied
derivative was to compare the rate on the notes to the best
financial alternative. The fair value determined as at
April 1, 2007 resulted in a positive adjustment to opening
retained earnings. The change in fair value in future periods is
recognized as a charge to earnings. Changes in fair value result
from changes in long-term bond interest rates during that
period. The valuation process presumes a 100% probability of our
implementing the inferred transaction and does not permit a
reduction in the probability if there are other factors that
would impact the decision.
With respect to the customer contract, there is a provision that
requires an adjustment to billings to our customer to reflect
actual exchange rate and price index changes versus the contract
amount. The embedded derivative instrument takes into account
the impact on revenues, but does not consider the impact on
costs as a result of fluctuations in these measures.
With respect to the supplier maintenance contract, there is a
provision that requires a price adjustment to reflect actual
exchange rate and price index changes versus the contract
amount. The embedded derivative instrument takes into account
the impact on costs as a result of fluctuations in these
measures.
The measurement of embedded derivatives, as required by the
accounting standards, cause our reported earnings to fluctuate
as currency exchange and interest rates change. The accounting
for these derivatives has no impact on operations, Consolidated
EBITDA (as defined within the revolving credit agreement) or how
we evaluate performance.
We recorded income tax expense of $5.3 million in the first
quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to an income tax recovery of
$2.9 million (restated) for the same period last year.
First quarter fiscal 2009 income tax expense as a percentage of
income before income taxes differs from the statutory rate of
29.38%, primarily due to the impact of the benefit from changes
in the timing of the reversal of temporary differences during
the period.
First quarter fiscal 2008 income tax expense as a percentage of
income before income taxes differed from the statutory rate of
31.72% primarily due to the impact of enacted rate changes
during the period and the impact of new accounting standards for
the recognition and measurement of financial instruments. Under
the new accounting standards, certain embedded derivatives are
considered capital in nature for income tax purposes.
Summary
of Quarterly Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
|
30-Jun-08
|
|
|
|
31-Mar-08
|
|
|
31-Dec-07
|
|
|
30-Sep-07
|
|
|
30-Jun-07
|
|
|
|
31-Mar-07
|
|
|
31-Dec-06
|
|
|
30-Sep-06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
259.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
323.6
|
|
|
$
|
274.9
|
|
|
$
|
223.6
|
|
|
$
|
167.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
205.4
|
|
|
$
|
155.9
|
|
|
$
|
130.1
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
47.6
|
|
|
|
|
62.6
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
25.4
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(8.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
EPS Basic(1)
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
EPS Diluted(1)
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net income (loss) per share for each quarter has been computed
based on the weighted average number of shares issued and
outstanding during the respective quarter; therefore, quarterly
amounts may not add to the annual total. Per share calculations
are based on full dollar and share amounts. |
10
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
As discussed previously, a number of factors have the potential
to contribute to variations in our quarterly results between
periods, including weather, capital spending by our customers on
large oil sands projects, our ability to manage our
project-related business so as to avoid or minimize periods of
relative inactivity and the strength of the Western Canadian
economy. For a detailed discussion regarding seasonality and its
impact on us see Key Trends section below.
The timing of large projects can influence quarterly revenue.
For example, Pipeline revenues were $31.3 million in the
second quarter of 2008 (up $28.5 million from fiscal 2007),
$76.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2008 (up
$61.5 million compared to fiscal 2007), $87.5 million
in the fourth quarter of 2008 (up $62.0 million compared to
fiscal 2007) and $27.1 million in the first quarter of
fiscal 2009 (up $21.9 million compared to fiscal 2008).
Heavy Construction and Mining experienced increased revenues
from the second quarter of fiscal 2008 through the first quarter
of fiscal 2009. This increase related to the execution of work
at Suncor Millennium Naphtha Unit project under our five-year
site services agreement and the construction of an aerodrome for
Albian, along with increased demand under our master service
agreements with Albian and Syncrude. Timing of work under the
site services agreements can vary based on our customers
production and project activities.
In addition to revenue variability, gross margins can be
negatively impacted by the timing of maintenance costs. The
timing of these costs are dependant on when management can make
the equipment available for service without adversely affecting
billable equipment hours.
Profitability also varies from period-to-period due as a result
of claims and change orders. Claims and change orders are a
normal aspect of the contracting business but can cause
variability in profit margin due to the unmatched recognition of
costs and revenues. For further explanation see Claims and
Change Orders. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009 a
$5.3 million claim was recognized causing gross margins for
the Pipeline segment to increase above what they would otherwise
have been. The additional costs relating to the claim were
incurred in fiscal 2007 and the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
Variations in quarterly results also result from our operating
leverage. During the higher activity periods we have experienced
improvements in operating income as certain costs, which are
generally fixed, including general and administrative expenses,
are spread over higher revenue levels. Net income and EPS are
also subject to operating leverage as provided by fixed interest
expense.
We have, however, experienced earnings variability in all
periods due to the recognition of unrealized non-cash gains and
losses on derivative financial instruments and foreign exchange
primarily driven by changes in the Canadian and U.S. dollar
exchange rates.
Consolidated
Financial Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q1-FY2009
|
|
|
Q4-FY2008
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
294,476
|
|
|
$
|
291,086
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(209,948
|
)
|
|
|
(183,353
|
)
|
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
Net working capital
|
|
|
84,528
|
|
|
|
107,733
|
|
|
|
(21.5
|
)%
|
Plant and equipment
|
|
|
331,575
|
|
|
|
281,039
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
Total assets
|
|
|
837,722
|
|
|
|
793,598
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
Capital Lease obligations (including current portion)
|
|
|
14,715
|
|
|
|
14,776
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
Total long-term financial liabilities(1)
|
|
|
(297,744
|
)
|
|
|
(301,497
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total long-term financial liabilities exclude the current
portions of capital lease obligations, current portions of
derivative financial instruments, long-term lease inducements
and both current and non-current future income taxes balances. |
11
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
At June 30, 2008 net working capital (current assets less
current liabilities) was $84.5 million compared to
$107.7 million at March 31, 2008, a decrease of
$23.2 million. Positive cash flow increased our overall
cash balance by $18.5 million to $51.3 million.
Collections improved on both trade receivables (reduced by
$20.4 million since March 31, 2008) and holdbacks
(reduced by $13.9 million since March 31,
2008) offset by increased unbilled revenue (up by
$18.7 million since March 31, 2008). First quarter
equipment purchases of $43.5 million are scheduled to be
paid after the quarter-end, thus increasing the balance of
accounts payable for the quarter. The semi-annual payment of the
senior note interest during the current period reduced the
accrued interest balance by $5.8 million.
For the first quarter of fiscal 2009, plant and equipment net of
depreciation, increased by $50.5 million compared to the
same period a year ago. This is a result of the capital
investment for the quarter offset by equipment disposals of
$2.5 million (net book value) and depreciation.
Total long-term financial liabilities decreased by
$3.8 million between June 30, 2008 and March 31,
2008 due to the decreased value of embedded derivatives
contained within the senior notes (a decrease of
$2.6 million) and the reduction in both the value of the
derivative financial instruments from the cross-currency and
interest swap agreement and the embedded derivatives from a
long-term construction contract and supplier maintenance
agreement (a decrease of $2.0 million).
Claims
and Change Orders
Due to the complexity of the projects we undertake, changes
often occur after work has commenced. These changes include, but
are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
Client requirements, specifications and design;
|
|
|
|
Materials and work schedules; and
|
|
|
|
Changes in ground and weather conditions.
|
Contract change management processes require that we prepare and
submit change orders to the client requesting approval of scope
and/or price
adjustments to the contract. Accounting guidelines require that
we consider changes in cost estimates that have occurred up to
the release of the financial statements and reflect the impact
of these changes in the financial statements. Conversely,
potential revenue associated with increases in cost estimates is
not included in financial statements until an agreement is
reached with the client or specific criteria for the recognition
of revenue from unapproved change orders and claims are met.
This can, and often does, lead to costs being recognized in one
period and revenue being recognized in subsequent periods.
Occasionally, disagreements arise regarding changes, their
nature, measurement, timing and other characteristics that
impact costs and revenue under the contract. If a change becomes
a point of dispute between our customer and us, we then consider
it to be a claim. Historical claim recoveries should not be
considered indicative of future claim recoveries.
As a result of certain projects experiencing some of the changes
discussed above, at June 30, 2008 we had approximately
$9.7 million in costs for claims and unsigned change orders
from project inception, with no associated increase in contract
value or revenue. We are working with our customers to come to
resolution on additional amounts, if any, to be paid to us in
respect to these additional costs.
In June 2008 the Pipeline division successfully settled a claim
related to a project in fiscal 2007. The claim was settled for
$8.0 million, of which $5.3 million was recognized as
revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 with the balance of
$2.7 million previously recognized as revenue.
12
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
C. Key
Trends
Seasonality
A number of factors contribute to variations in our quarterly
results between periods, including weather, capital spending by
our customers on large oil sands projects, our ability to manage
our project-related business so as to avoid or minimize periods
of relative inactivity and the strength of the Western Canadian
economy.
In addition to revenue variability, gross margins can be
negatively impacted in less active periods because we are likely
to incur higher maintenance and repair costs due to our
equipment being available for service. Profitability also varies
from period to period due to claims and change orders. Claims
and change orders are a normal aspect of the contracting
business but can cause variability in profit margin due to the
unmatched recognition of costs and revenues. For further
explanation see Claims and Change Orders.
During the higher activity periods we have experienced
improvements in operating income due to operating leverage.
General and administrative costs are generally fixed and we see
these costs decrease as a percentage of revenue. Net income and
EPS are also subject to operating leverage as provided by fixed
interest expense, however we have experienced earnings
variability in all periods due to the recognition of realized
and unrealized non-cash gains and losses on derivative financial
instruments and foreign exchange primarily driven by changes in
the Canadian and U.S. dollar exchange rates.
Backlog
Backlog is a measure of the amount of secured work we have
outstanding and, as such, is an indicator of future revenue
potential. Backlog is not a GAAP measure. As a result, the
definition and determination of a backlog will vary among
different organizations ascribing a value to backlog. Although
backlog reflects business that we consider to be firm,
cancellations or reductions may occur and may reduce backlog and
future income.
We define backlog as that work that has a high certainty of
being performed as evidenced by the existence of a signed
contract or work order specifying job scope, value and timing.
We have also set a policy that our definition of backlog will be
limited to contracts or work orders with values exceeding
$500,000 and work that will be performed in the next five years,
even if the related contracts extend beyond five years.
We work with our customers using cost-plus,
time-and-materials,
unit-price and lump-sum contracts and the mix of contract types
varies
year-by-year.
Our definition of backlog results in the exclusion of cost-plus
and
time-and-material
contracts performed under master service agreements where scope
is not clearly defined. While contracts exist for a range of
services to be provided, the work scope and value are not
clearly defined under those contracts. For the first quarter of
fiscal 2009, the total amount of revenue earned under the master
services agreements was $129.0 million.
Our estimated backlog as at June 30, 2008 and 2007 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
By Segment
|
|
(Q1-FY2009)
|
|
|
(Q1-FY2008)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Heavy Construction & Mining
|
|
$
|
593.3
|
|
|
$
|
711.0
|
|
Piling
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
Pipeline
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
192.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
675.1
|
|
|
$
|
929.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
By Contract Type
|
|
(Q1-FY2009)
|
|
|
(Q1-FY2008)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Unit-Price
|
|
$
|
598.5
|
|
|
$
|
739.0
|
|
Lump-Sum
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Time & Materials, Cost-Plus
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
184.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
675.1
|
|
|
$
|
929.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A contract with a single customer represented approximately
$524 million of the June 30, 2008 backlog. It is
expected that approximately $316.0 million of the total
backlog will be performed and realized in the 12 months
ending June 30, 2009.*
Revenue
Sources
We have experienced a steady growth in master services
agreements as oil sands development continues to grow. While
there is no long-term commitment from customers regarding this
work as described below, we expect these trends to continue
through fiscal 2009 as we continue to provide services to
Syncrude and Suncor and benefit from growth at the Shell sites.*
Revenue
by Category
Long-term contracts. This category of revenue
is generated from long-term contracts (greater than one year)
with total contract values greater than $20 million. These
contracts are for work that supports the operations of our
* This paragraph
contains forward-looking statements. Please refer to
Forward-Looking Information and Risk Factors for a
discussion on the risks and uncertainties related to such
information.
14
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
customers and are therefore considered to be recurring including
long-term contracts for overburden removal and reclamation. This
revenue is typically generated under unit-price contracts and is
included in our calculation of backlog.
Major Projects. This category includes revenue
generated from projects with contract values greater than
$20 million and durations of greater than six months. This
category of revenue is typically generated supporting major
capital construction projects and is therefore considered to be
non-recurring. This revenue can be generated under lump-sum,
unit-price,
time-and-materials
and cost-plus contracts. This revenue can be included in backlog
if generated under lump-sum, unit-price or
time-and-materials
contracts.
Master Services Agreements. This category
includes revenue generated from the master services agreements
in place with Syncrude and Albian. This category of revenue is
also generated by supporting the operations of our customers and
is therefore considered to be recurring. This revenue is not
guaranteed under contract and would not be included in our
calculation of backlog. This revenue is primarily generated
under time and materials contracts.
Other Projects. This category includes revenue
generated from contracts with values of less than
$20 million and durations of, typically, less than six
months. This category of revenue is generally driven by capital
construction and is therefore non-recurring. This revenue can be
generated under lump-sum, unit-price,
time-and-materials
and cost-plus contracts. This revenue is included in backlog if
generated under lump-sum, unit-price contracts or time and
materials contracts and the job scope, value and timing is known.
Revenue
by End Market
Projects in the oil sands increased our work volumes during
fiscal 2008 and into the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The
pipeline installation project for Kinder Morgan increased our
revenues in the conventional oil and gas sector. Minerals mining
work slowed at the end of fiscal 2008 and into the first quarter
of fiscal 2009 as we completed the work on the DeBeers diamond
mine project.
15
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
Revenue
by Contract Type
Contracts
We complete work under the following types of contracts:
cost-plus,
time-and-materials,
unit-price and
lump-sum.
Each contract contains a different level of risk associated with
its formation and execution.
Cost-plus. A cost-plus contract is a contract
in which all the work is completed based on actual costs
incurred to complete the work. These costs include all labor,
equipment, materials and any subcontractors costs. In
addition to these direct costs, all site and corporate overhead
costs are charged to the job. An agreed upon fee in the form of
a fixed percentage is then applied to all costs charged to the
project. This type of contract is utilized where the project
involves a large amount of risk or the scope of the project
cannot be readily determined.
Time-and-materials. A
time-and-materials
contract involves using the components of a cost-plus job to
calculate rates for the supply of labor and equipment. In this
regard, all components of the rates are fixed and we are
compensated for each hour of labor and equipment supplied. The
risk associated with this type of contract is the estimation of
the rates and incurrence of expenses in excess of a specific
component of the
agreed-upon
rate. Any cost overrun in this type of contract must come out of
the fixed margin included in the rates.
Unit-price. A unit-price contract is utilized
in the execution of projects with large repetitive quantities of
work and is commonly utilized for site preparation, mining and
pipeline work. We are compensated for each unit of work we
perform (for example, cubic meters of earth moved, lineal meters
of pipe installed or completed piles). Within the unit-price
contract, there is an allowance for labor, equipment, materials
and any subcontractors costs. Once these costs are
calculated, we add any site and corporate overhead costs along
with an allowance for the margin we want to achieve. The risk
associated with this type of contract is in the calculation of
the unit costs with respect to completing the required work.
Lump-sum. A lump-sum contract is utilized when
a detailed scope of work is known for a specific project. Thus,
the associated costs can be readily calculated and a firm price
provided to the customer for the execution of the work. The risk
lies in the fact that there is no escalation of the price if the
work takes longer or more resources are
16
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
required than were estimated in the established price, as the
price is fixed regardless of the amount of work required to
complete the project.
Major
Suppliers
We have long-term relationships with the following equipment
suppliers: Finning International Inc. (45 years), Wajax
Income Fund (20 years) and Brandt Tractor Ltd.
(30 years). Finning is a major Caterpillar heavy equipment
dealer for Canada. Wajax is a major Hitachi equipment supplier
to us for both mining and construction equipment. We purchase or
rent John Deere equipment, including excavators, loaders and
small bulldozers, from Brandt Tractor. In addition to the supply
of new equipment, each of these companies is a major supplier
for equipment rentals, parts and service labor.
Tire supply remains a challenge for our haul truck fleet. We
prefer to use radial tires from proven manufacturers but the
shortage of supply has forced us to increase the use of bias
tires and radial tires from new manufacturers. Bias tires have a
shorter usage life and are of a lower quality than radial tires.
This affects operations as we are forced to reduce operating
speeds and loads to compensate for the quality of the tires.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2008 we continued to
reduce our inventory of bias tires for the 150-ton haul trucks
and are now acquiring radial tires for these trucks as required.
Preliminary findings from the use of the bias tires have shown
that these tires are accumulating reasonable life hours, or in
some cases better-than-expected life hours. Tires for the
240-ton haul trucks continue to be in short supply. To address
this shortfall, we are purchasing bias tires from new
manufacturers and radial tires from non-dealer sources at a
large premium above dealer prices. We were able to negotiate a
five-year contract (commencing in 2008) with Bridgestone
Firestone Canada Inc. to secure a tire allotment for select tire
sizes for the 240-ton to 320-ton haul trucks, which will
alleviate some of the shortage. We are continuing negotiations
with Bridgestone to improve the security of tire supply. We have
also been successful in acquiring radial tires with new trucks
as they are delivered and hope to continue this practice in
fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010. Suppliers have improved overall
tire supply, but we believe the tire shortage will remain an
issue for the foreseeable future.*
Competition
Our industry is highly competitive in each of our markets.
Historically, the majority of our new business was awarded to us
based on past client relationships without a formal bidding
process, in which, typically, a small number of pre-qualified
firms submit bids for the project work. Recently, in order to
generate new business with new customers, we have had to
participate in formal bidding processes. As new major projects
arise, we expect to have to participate in bidding processes on
a meaningful portion of the work available to us on these
projects. Factors that impact competition include price, safety,
reliability, scale of operations, equipment and labour
availability and quality of service. Most of our clients and
potential clients in the oil sands area operate their own heavy
mining equipment fleet. However, these operators have
historically outsourced a significant portion of their mining
and site preparation operations and other construction services.*
Our principal competitors in the Heavy Construction and Mining
segment include Cow Harbour Construction Ltd., Cross
Construction Ltd., Klemke Mining Corporation, Ledcor
Construction Limited, Peter Kiewit and Sons Co., Tercon
Contractors Ltd., Sureway Construction Ltd. and Thompson Bros.
(Construction) Ltd. In underground utilities installation (a
part of our Heavy Construction and Mining segment) Voice
Construction Ltd., Ledcor Construction Limited and I.G.L.
Industrial Services are our major competitors. The main
competition to our deep foundation piling operations comes from
Agra Foundations Limited, Double Star Co. and Ruskin
Construction Ltd.
* This paragraph
contains forward-looking statements. Plese refer to
Forward-Looking Information and Risk Factors for a
discussion on the risks and uncertainties related to such
information.
17
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
The primary competitors in the pipeline installation business
include Ledcor Construction Limited, Washcuk Pipe Line
Construction Ltd. and Willbros.
In the public sector, we compete against national firms and
there is usually more than one competitor in each local market.
Most of our public sector customers are local governments that
are focused on serving only their local regions. Competition in
the public sector continues to increase, and we typically choose
to compete on projects only where we can utilize our equipment
and operating strengths to secure profitable business.
Continued development of the oil sands is expected to drive a
significant portion of our fiscal 2009 revenue. In addition to
existing mining and site services contracts with customers
including Canadian Natural, Suncor, Syncrude, Albian and
Petro-Canada, we also anticipate increased demand for our
services at Petro-Canadas Fort Hills site as that
project progresses.*
Outside of the oil sands, we continue to provide
constructability assistance to a number of potential mining
customers for developments across Canada. Our success with the
Albian aerodrome project, meanwhile, has resulted in significant
interest from customers looking to develop airstrips in northern
Alberta.*
Demand for our piling services is expected to remain strong in
fiscal 2009 with commercial construction activity at a high
level in Western Canada. A number of upgrader facilities are
also being considered for the Edmonton area, providing
opportunities to bid on larger-scale piling contracts.*
While we anticipate a temporary slowdown in our pipeline
activity once the TMX project concludes in October 2008, we see
significant long-term opportunities for this division. More than
five major new pipeline projects are planned for Western Canada
to relieve limited capacity and accommodate growing oil sands
production. We believe our success on the large and
environmentally-demanding TMX project positions us to compete
effectively as the new pipeline projects are tendered.*
Overall, our outlook for the remainder of fiscal 2009 remains
very positive.
|
|
E.
|
Legal
and Labour Matters
|
Laws
and Regulations and Environmental Matters
Many aspects of our operations are subject to various federal,
provincial and local laws and regulations, including, among
others:
|
|
|
|
|
permitting and licensing requirements applicable to contractors
in their respective trades;
|
|
|
|
building and similar codes and zoning ordinances;
|
|
|
|
laws and regulations relating to consumer protection; and
|
|
|
|
laws and regulations relating to worker safety and protection of
human health.
|
We believe we have all material required permits and licenses to
conduct our operations and are in substantial compliance with
applicable regulatory requirements relating to our operations.
Our failure to comply with the applicable regulations could
result in substantial fines or revocation of our operating
permits.
Our operations are subject to numerous federal, provincial and
municipal environmental laws and regulations, including those
governing the release of substances, the remediation of
contaminated soil and groundwater, vehicle
* This paragraph
contains forward-looking statements. Please refer to
Forward-Looking Information and Risk Factors for a
discussion on the risks and uncertainties related to such
information.
18
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
emissions and air and water emissions. These laws and
regulations are administered by federal, provincial and
municipal authorities, such as Alberta Environment, Saskatchewan
Environment, the British Columbia Ministry of Environment, and
other governmental agencies. The requirements of these laws and
regulations are becoming increasingly complex and stringent, and
meeting these requirements can be expensive.
The nature of our operations and our ownership or operation of
property exposes us to the risk of claims with respect to
environmental matters, and there can be no assurance that
material costs or liabilities will not be incurred with such
claims. For example, some laws can impose strict, joint and
several liability on past and present owners or operators of
facilities at, from or to which a release of hazardous
substances has occurred, on parties who generated hazardous
substances that were released at such facilities and on parties
who arranged for the transportation of hazardous substances to
such facilities. If we were found to be a responsible party
under these statutes, we could be held liable for all
investigative and remedial costs associated with addressing such
contamination, even though the releases were caused by a prior
owner or operator or third party. We are not currently named as
a responsible party for any environmental liabilities on any of
the properties on which we currently perform or have performed
services. However, our leases typically include covenants which
obligate us to comply with all applicable environmental
regulations and to remediate any environmental damage caused by
us to the leased premises. In addition, claims alleging personal
injury or property damage may be brought against us if we cause
the release of, or any exposure to, harmful substances.
Our construction contracts require us to comply with all
environmental and safety standards set by our customers. These
requirements cover such areas as safety training for new hires,
equipment use on site, visitor access on site and procedures for
dealing with hazardous substances.
Capital expenditures relating to environmental matters during
the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 were
not material. We do not currently anticipate any material
adverse effect on our business or financial position as a result
of future compliance with applicable environmental laws and
regulations. Future events, however, such as changes in existing
laws and regulations or their interpretation, more vigorous
enforcement policies of regulatory agencies or stricter or
different interpretations of existing laws and regulations may
require us to make additional expenditures which may be
material.*
Employees
and Labor Relations
As of June 30, 2008, we had over 300 salaried employees and
over 1,900 hourly employees. Our hourly workforce will
fluctuate according to the seasonality of our business from an
estimated low of 1,500 employees in the spring to a high of
approximately 2,400 employees over the winter. We also
utilize the services of subcontractors in our construction
business. An estimated 8% to 10% of the construction work we do
is performed by subcontractors. Approximately
2,000 employees are members of various unions and work
under collective bargaining agreements. The majority of our work
is done through employees governed by our mining overburden
collective bargaining agreement with the International Union of
Operating Engineers Local 955, the primary term of which expires
on October 31, 2009. A small portion of our employees work
under an industrial collective bargaining agreement with the
Alberta Road Builders and Heavy Construction Association and the
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 955, the
primary term of which expires February 28, 2009. In June
2008 we signed an agreement with the International Union of
Operating Engineers Local 955 covering the small group of
employees working in our Acheson shop, which will expire
June 30, 2011. We are subject to other industry and
specialty collective agreements under which we complete work,
and the primary terms of all of these agreements are currently
in effect. We believe that our relationships with all our
employees, both union and non-union, are satisfactory. We have
not yet experienced a strike or lockout.*
* This paragraph
contains forward-looking statements. Please refer to
Forward-Looking Information and Risk Factors for a
discussion on the risks and uncertainties related to such
information.
19
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
Outstanding
Share Data
We are authorized to issue an unlimited number of common voting
shares and an unlimited number of common non-voting shares. As
at August 13, 2008 36,038,476 common voting shares were
outstanding (36,036,476 as at June 30, 2008) This
compares to 35,929,476 common voting shares as at March 31,
2008 and 35,192,260 common voting shares and 412,400 non-voting
common shares outstanding as at March 31, 2007.
Liquidity
Liquidity
requirements
Our primary uses of cash are for plant and equipment purchases,
to fulfill debt repayment and interest payment obligations, to
fund operating lease obligations and to finance working capital
requirements.
We maintain a significant equipment and vehicle fleet comprised
of units with remaining useful lives covering a variety of time
spans. It is important to adequately maintain our large
revenue-producing fleet in order to avoid equipment downtime
which can impact our revenue stream and inhibit our ability to
satisfactorily perform on our projects. Once units reach the end
of their useful lives, they are replaced as it becomes cost
prohibitive to continue to maintain them. As a result, we are
continually acquiring new equipment to replace retired units and
to support our growth as we take on new projects. In order to
maintain a balance of owned and leased equipment, we have
financed a portion of our heavy construction fleet through
operating leases. In addition, we continue to lease our motor
vehicle fleet through our capital lease facilities.
We require between $30 million and $40 million for
sustaining capital expenditures and our total capital
requirements will typically range from $125 million to
$200 million depending on our growth capital requirements.
We typically finance approximately 30% to 50% of our total
capital requirements through our operating lease facilities, 5%
to 10% through our capital lease facilities and the remainder
out of cash flow from operations. We believe our operating and
capital lease facilities and cash flow from operations will be
sufficient to meet these requirements.*
Our long-term debt includes US$200 million of
83/4% senior
notes due in 2011. The foreign currency risk relating to both
the principal and interest portions of these senior notes has
been managed with a cross-currency swap and interest rate swaps,
which went into effect concurrent with the issuance of the notes
on November 26, 2003. The swap agreements are an economic
hedge but have not been designated as hedges for accounting
purposes. Interest totaling $13.0 million on the
83/4% senior
notes and the swap is payable semi-annually in June and December
of each year until the notes mature on December 1, 2011.
The US$200 million principal amount was hedged at
C$1.315=US$1.000, resulting in a principal repayment of
$263 million due on December 1, 2011. There are no
principal repayments required on the
83/4% senior
notes until maturity.
One of our major contracts allows the customer to require that
we provide up to $50 million in letters of credit. As at
June 30, 2008, we had $20.0 million in letters of
credit outstanding in connection with this contract. Any change
in the amount of the letters of credit required by this customer
must be requested by November 1st for an issue date of
January 1st,
each year for the remaining life of the contract.
Sources
of liquidity
Our principal sources of cash are funds from operations and
borrowings under our revolving credit facility. As of
June 30, 2008, we had approximately $104.3 million of
available borrowings under the revolving credit facility
* This paragraph
contains forward-looking statements. Please refer to
Forward-Looking Information and Risk Factors for a
discussion on the risks and uncertainties related to such
information.
20
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
after taking into account $20.7 million of outstanding and
undrawn letters of credit to support performance guarantees
associated with customer contracts.
Revolving
credit facility
We entered into an amended and restated credit agreement dated
on June 7, 2007 with a syndicate of lenders that provides
us with a $125.0 million revolving credit facility. Our
revolving credit facility provides for an original principal
amount of up to $125.0 million under which revolving loans
may be made and under which letters of credit may be issued. The
facility will mature on June 7, 2010, subject to possible
extension. The credit facility is secured by a first priority
lien on substantially all of our and our subsidiaries
existing and after-acquired property (tangible and intangible),
including, without limitation, accounts receivable, inventory,
equipment, intellectual property and other personal property,
and real property, whether owned or leased, and a pledge of the
shares of our subsidiaries, subject to various exceptions.
The facility bears interest on each prime loan at variable rates
based on the Canadian prime rate plus the applicable pricing
margin (as defined in the credit agreement). Interest on
U.S. base rate loans is paid at a rate per annum equal to
the U.S. base rate plus the applicable pricing margin.
Interest on prime and U.S. base rate loans is payable
monthly in arrears and computed on the basis of a 365- or
366-day
year, as the case may be. Interest on LIBOR loans is paid during
each interest period at a rate per annum, calculated on a
360-day
year, equal to the LIBOR rate with respect to such interest
period plus the applicable pricing margin.
Our revolving credit facility contains covenants that restrict
our activities, including, but not limited to, incurring
additional debt, transferring or selling assets and making
investments including acquisitions. Under the revolving credit
facility, Consolidated Capital Expenditures (as defined in the
credit agreement) during any applicable period cannot exceed
120% of the amount in the capital expenditure plan. In addition,
we are required to satisfy certain financial covenants,
including a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum senior
leverage ratio, both of which are calculated using Consolidated
EBITDA (as defined within the revolving credit agreement), as
well as a minimum current ratio.
Consolidated EBITDA (as defined within the revolving credit
agreement) is defined in the credit facility as the sum, without
duplication, of (1) consolidated net income,
(2) consolidated interest expense, (3) provision for
taxes based on income, (4) total depreciation expense,
(5) total amortization expense, (6) costs and expenses
incurred by us in entering into the credit facility,
(7) accrual of stock-based compensation expense to the
extent not paid in cash or if satisfied by the issue of new
equity, and (8) other non-cash items (other than any such
non-cash item to the extent it represents an accrual of or
reserve for cash expenditure in any future period), but only, in
the case of clauses (2)-(8), to the extent deducted in the
calculation of consolidated net income, less other non-cash
items added in the calculation of consolidated net income (other
than any such non-cash item to the extent it will result in the
receipt of cash payments in any future period), all of the
foregoing as determined on a consolidated basis for us in
conformity with Canadian GAAP.
Interest coverage is determined based on a ratio of Consolidated
EBITDA (as defined within the revolving credit agreement) to
consolidated cash interest expense and the senior leverage is
determined as a ratio of senior debt to Consolidated EBITDA.
Measured as of the last day of each fiscal quarter on a trailing
four-quarter basis, Consolidated EBITDA shall not be less than
2.5 times consolidated cash interest expense (2.35 times at
June 30, 2007). Also, measured as of the last day of each
fiscal quarter on a trailing four-quarter basis, senior leverage
shall not exceed twice Consolidated EBITDA. We believe
Consolidated EBITDA is an important measure of our performance
and liquidity.
The credit facility may be prepaid in whole or in part without
penalty, except for bankers acceptances, which will not be
pre-payable prior to their maturity. However, the credit
facility requires prepayments under various circumstances, such
as: (i) 100% of the net cash proceeds of certain asset
dispositions, (ii) 100% of the net cash
21
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
proceeds from our issuance of equity (unless the use of such
securities proceeds is otherwise designated by the applicable
offering document) and (iii) 100% of all casualty insurance
and condemnation proceeds, subject to exceptions.
Working
capital fluctuations effect on cash
The seasonality of our work may result in a slow down in cash
collections between December and early February which may result
in an increase in our working capital requirements. Our working
capital is also significantly affected by the timing of
completion of projects. Our customers are permitted to withhold
payment of a percentage of the amount owing to us for a
stipulated period of time (such percentage and time period
usually defined by the contract and in some cases provincial
legislation). This amount acts as a form of security for our
customers and is referred to as a holdback. We are only entitled
to collect payment on holdbacks once substantial completion of
the contract is performed, there are no outstanding claims by
subcontractors or others related to work performed by us and we
have met the time period specified by the contract (usually
45 days after completion of the work). As at June 30,
2008 holdbacks totaled $21.1 million down from
$35.0 million as at March 31, 2008. Holdbacks
represent 16.5% of our total Accounts Receivable outstanding as
at June 30, 2008 (21.0% as at March 31, 2008). This
decrease is attributable to the seasonal reduction of revenue
compared to the previous two quarters and the collection of
holdbacks outstanding as at March 31, 2008 including the
DeBeers holdback for $11.0 million. As at June 30,
2008 we carried $12.8 million in holdbacks for three large
customers.
Debt
Ratings
In December 2007 Standard & Poors upgraded our
debt rating to B+ (from B) with a stable outlook following
a review of our current and prospective business risk and
financial risk profiles. Our senior unsecured notes are also
rated B+ with a recovery rating of 4 indicating an
expectation for an average of (30% 50%) recovery in
the event of a payment default.
In December 2007 Moodys maintained our debt rating at B2
with a stable outlook (the upgrade to B2 was issued in December
2006 following our IPO). Moodys rates our senior unsecured
notes at B3 with a loss given default rating of 5.
Cash
Flow and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Q1-FY2009)
|
|
|
(Q1-FY2008)
|
|
|
(Q1-FY2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
33,341
|
|
|
$
|
7,404
|
|
|
$
|
15,050
|
|
Cash (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(14,332
|
)
|
|
|
(4,490
|
)
|
|
|
(11,370
|
)
|
Cash (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
(1,329
|
)
|
|
|
(1,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
18,461
|
|
|
$
|
1,585
|
|
|
$
|
2,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
activities
Cash provided by operating activities for the first quarter of
fiscal 2009 was $33.3 million compared to $7.4 million
and $15.1 million for the comparable periods in the two
prior years. Operating activities in the three month period
ended June 30, 2008 (first quarter of fiscal
2009) benefitted from favourable cash collections and
holdback reductions. The lower cash generated in the first
quarters of the preceding fiscal years was a result of lower
earnings for those periods and higher trade receivables.
22
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
Investing
activities
Sustaining capital expenditures are those that are required to
keep our existing fleet of equipment at its optimal useful life
through capital maintenance or replacement. Growth capital
expenditures relate to equipment additions required to perform
larger or a greater number of projects.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we invested
$4.4 million in sustaining capital expenditures (Q1 fiscal
2008 $5.7 million; Q1 fiscal 2007
$4.7 million) and invested $54.9 million
in growth capital expenditures (Q1 fiscal 2008
$4.5 million; Q1 fiscal 2007
$7.1 million), for total capital expenditures of
$59.3 million (Q1 fiscal 2008
$10.2 million; Q1 fiscal 2007
$11.8 million). Accounts payable included
$43.5 million for capital expenditures that are scheduled
to be paid subsequent to quarter-end. Proceeds from asset
disposals of $1.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal
2009 (Q1 fiscal 2008 $13.9 million; Q1 fiscal
2007 $0.5 million) lessened the effect of
capital purchases resulting in net cash invested of
$14.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2009 (Q1
fiscal 2008 $4.5; Q1 fiscal 2007
$11.4 million). Operating leases used to fund equipment
purchases added $21.3 million in the first quarter of
fiscal 2009 (not reflected in capital spend) compared to no new
operating lease additions in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
Financing
activities
Financing activities in the first quarter of fiscal 2009
resulted in a cash outflow of $0.5 million due to the
repayment of capital leases offset by proceeds received from the
exercise of stock options. Cash outflow in the first quarter of
fiscal 2008 of $1.3 million was a result of increases to
the revolving credit facility costs, financing costs and capital
lease repayments offset by an inflow of cash from stock options
being exercised. Cash outflow in the first quarter of fiscal
2007 of $1.3 million was a result of financing costs and
the repayment of capital leases.
Capital
Commitments
Contractual
Obligations and Other Commitments
Our principal contractual obligations relate to our long-term
debt, capital and operating leases and supplier contracts. The
following table summarizes our future contractual obligations,
excluding interest payments unless otherwise noted, as of
June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 and
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
after
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes(a)
|
|
$
|
263.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.0
|
|
|
$
|
263.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.0
|
|
Capital leases (including interest)
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
107.5
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
Supplier contracts
|
|
|
35.4
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
422.4
|
|
|
$
|
36.4
|
|
|
$
|
41.2
|
|
|
$
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
289.9
|
|
|
$
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
We have entered into cross-currency and interest rate swaps,
which represent an economic hedge of the
83/4% senior
notes. At maturity, we will be required to pay
$263.0 million in order to retire these senior notes and
the swaps. This amount reflects the fixed exchange rate of
C$1.315=US$1.00 established as of November 26, 2003, the
inception of the swap contracts. At June 30, 2008 the
carrying value of the derivative financial instruments was
$80.5 million, inclusive of the interest components. |
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements in place at this time.
23
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
Cash
Requirements
As of June 30, 2008 our cash balance of $51.3 million
was $18.5 million higher than our cash balance on
March 31, 2008. We anticipate that we will continue to
generate a net cash surplus in fiscal 2009. In the event that we
require additional funding, we believe that any such funding
requirements would be satisfied by the funds available from our
revolving credit facility.*
Internal
Systems and Processes
Overview
of information systems
We currently use JDE (Enterprise One) as our Enterprise Resource
Planning (ERP) tool and deploy the financial system, payroll,
procurement, job-costing and equipment maintenance modules from
this tool. We supplement this functionality with either
third-party software (for our estimating system) or in-house
developed tools (for project management).
In fiscal 2008 we focused on developing systems and processes
using our ERP system to increase the automation of transactional
activities and improve management information. The proper
identification of costs is a critical part of our ability to
recognize revenues and we have focused resources to addressing
this issue. Throughout 2008 we concentrated on the development
of better cost tracking tools through the implementation of a
procure-to-pay process in our ERP system. We also started work
on improving the process for tracking and reporting equipment
and maintenance costs. Despite some initial implementation
hurdles over the summer and fall of 2007, we are seeing some
improvements in the identification and tracking of our
procurement costs.
We are currently performing a user-needs analysis and comparing
this to the functionality of our ERP system. We have extended
the analysis into the second quarter of fiscal 2009 to determine
if we can implement additional modules or commence a review of
industry-specific software to supplement our existing ERP
functionality.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2009 we reorganized the financial
reporting team and recruited for both technical expertise and
financial reporting experience. We are currently evaluating and
revamping our financial reporting processes.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management has evaluated whether there were changes in our
internal controls over financial reporting during the three
month period ended June 30, 2008 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal controls over financial reporting. No material changes
were identified.
As of March 31, 2008, we identified material weaknesses in
internal controls over financial reporting as described below.
We did not maintain effective processes and controls related to
the following;
|
|
|
|
|
Specific to complex and non routine transactions and period end
controls: There was a lack of sufficient accounting and finance
personnel with an appropriate level of technical accounting
knowledge and training commensurate with the complexity of the
Companys financial accounting and reporting requirements.
Complex and non routine financial report matters that would be
affected by this deficiency include the identification of
embedded derivatives and preparation of the Companys US
GAAP reconciliation note. Additionally, we did not adequately
perform period end controls related to the review and approval
of account analysis, verification of inputs and reconciliations.
The accounts that would be affected these deficiencies are cash,
senior notes, contributed surplus, stock-based compensation
expense, foreign exchange and related financial statement
disclosures.
|
* This paragraph
contains forward-looking statements. Please refer to
Forward-Looking Information and Risk Factors for a
discussion on the risks and uncertainties related to such
information.
24
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Specific to revenue recognition: A formal process to track
claims and unapproved change orders and sufficient monitoring
controls over the completeness and accuracy of forecasts,
including the consideration of project changes subsequent to the
end of each reporting period, were not effectively implemented.
The accounts that would be affected by these deficiencies are
revenue, project costs, unbilled revenue and billings in excess
of costs incurred and estimated earning on uncompleted contracts.
|
|
|
|
Specific to accounts payable and procurement We did
not have an effectively implemented procurement process to track
purchase commitments, reconcile vendor accounts and accurately
accrue costs not invoiced by vendor at each reporting date. The
accounts that would be affected by these deficiencies are
accounts payable, accrued liabilities, unbilled revenue,
billings in excess of costs incurred and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts, revenue, project costs, equipment costs,
general and administrative costs and other expenses.
|
As of June 30, 2008, these material weaknesses have not
been remediated. For a discussion of our remediation plans,
which are ongoing, and for a discussion of the risks associated
with such weaknesses, please see our most recent annual
Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Significant
Accounting Policies
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Certain accounting policies require management to make
significant estimates and assumptions about future events that
affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and the
accompanying notes. Therefore, the determination of estimates
requires the exercise of managements judgment. Actual
results could differ from those estimates and any differences
may be material to our financial statements.
Revenue
recognition
Our contracts with customers fall under the following contract
types: cost-plus,
time-and-materials,
unit-price and lump-sum. While contracts are generally less than
one year in duration, we do have several long-term contracts.
The mix of contract types varies
year-by-year.
For first quarter of fiscal 2009, our revenue consisted of 49.8%
time-and-materials,
42.5% unit-price and 7.7% lump-sum.
Profit for each type of contract is included in revenue when its
realization is reasonably assured. Estimated contract losses are
recognized in full when determined. Claims and unapproved change
orders are included in total estimated contract revenue only to
the extent that contract costs related to the claim or
unapproved change order have been incurred, when it is probable
that the claim or unapproved change order will result in a bona
fide addition to contract value and the amount of revenue can be
reliably estimated.
The accuracy of our revenue and profit recognition in a given
period is dependent, in part, on the accuracy of our estimates
of the cost to complete each unit-price and lump-sum project.
Our cost estimates use a detailed
bottom-up
approach, using inputs such as labour and equipment hours,
detailed drawings and material lists. These estimates are
updated monthly. We have noted a material weakness related to
our procurement processes as previously identified in the fiscal
year-end March 31, 2008 Managements Discussion and
Analysis. To address these weaknesses we implemented monitoring
and review controls to assist with the determination of our cost
estimates. These controls require a significant review of our
payable activities after the month-end to ensure that we have
identified project costs in the correct period. Given the time
delay in identifying costs we may misstate revenues. However, we
believe our experience allows us to produce materially reliable
estimates. Our projects can be highly complex and in almost
every case, the profit margin estimates for a project will
either increase or decrease to some extent from the amount that
was originally estimated at the time of the related bid. Because
we have many projects of varying levels of complexity and size
in process at any given time, these changes in estimates can
offset each other without materially impacting our
profitability. However, sizable changes in cost estimates,
particularly in
25
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
larger, more complex projects, can have a significant effect on
profitability. Factors that can contribute to changes in
estimates of contract cost and profitability include, without
limitation:*
|
|
|
|
|
site conditions that differ from those assumed in the original
bid, to the extent that contract remedies are unavailable;
|
|
|
|
identification and evaluation of scope modifications during the
execution of the project;
|
|
|
|
the availability and cost of skilled workers in the geographic
location of the project;
|
|
|
|
the availability and proximity of materials;
|
|
|
|
unfavorable weather conditions hindering productivity;
|
|
|
|
equipment productivity and timing differences resulting from
project construction not starting on time; and
|
|
|
|
general coordination of work inherent in all large projects we
undertake.
|
The foregoing factors, as well as the stage of completion of
contracts in process and the mix of contracts at different
margins, may cause fluctuations in gross profit between periods
and these fluctuations may be significant. These changes in cost
estimates and revenue recognition impact all three business
segments, Heavy Construction and Mining, Piling and Pipeline.
Once contract performance is underway, we will often experience
changes in conditions, client requirements, specifications,
designs, materials and work schedule. Generally, a change
order will be negotiated with the customer to modify the
original contract to approve both the scope and price of the
change. Occasionally, however, disagreements arise regarding
changes, their nature, measurement, timing and other
characteristics that impact costs and revenue under the
contract. When a change becomes a point of dispute between us
and a customer, we will then consider it as a claim.
Costs related to change orders and claims are recognized when
they are incurred. Change orders are included in total estimated
contract revenue when it is probable that the change order will
result in a bona fide addition to contract value and can be
reliably estimated. Claims are included in total estimated
contract revenue, only to the extent that contract costs related
to the claim have been incurred and when it is probable that the
claim will result in a bona fide addition to contract value and
can be reliably estimated. Those two conditions are satisfied
when (1) the contract or other evidence provides a legal
basis for the claim or a legal opinion is obtained providing a
reasonable basis to support the claim, (2) additional costs
incurred were caused by unforeseen circumstances and are not the
result of deficiencies in our performance, (3) costs
associated with the claim are identifiable and reasonable in
view of work performed and (4) evidence supporting the
claim is objective and verifiable. No profit is recognized on
claims until final settlement occurs. This can lead to a
situation where costs are recognized in one period and revenue
is recognized when customer agreement is obtained or claim
resolution occurs, which can be in subsequent periods.
Historical claim recoveries should not be considered indicative
of future claim recoveries.
Plant and
equipment
The most significant estimates in accounting for plant and
equipment are the expected useful life of the asset and the
expected residual value. Most of our property, plant and
equipment have long lives that can exceed 20 years with
proper repair work and preventative maintenance. Useful life is
measured in operating hours, excluding idle hours and a
depreciation rate is calculated for each type of unit.
Depreciation expense is determined monthly based on daily actual
operating hours.
* This paragraph
contains forward-looking statements. Please refer to
Forward-Looking Information and Risk Factors for a
discussion on the risks and uncertainties related to such
information.
26
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
Another key estimate is the expected cash flows from the use of
an asset and the expected disposal proceeds in applying CICA
Section 3063 Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
and Section 3475 Disposal of Long-Lived Assets and
Discontinued Operations. These standards require the
recognition of an impairment loss for a long-lived asset when
changes in circumstances cause its carrying value to exceed the
total undiscounted cash flows expected from its use. An
impairment loss, if any, is determined as the excess of the
carrying value of the asset over its fair value.
Goodwill
impairment
Impairment is tested at the reporting unit level by comparing
the reporting units carrying amount to its fair value. The
process of determining fair value is subjective and requires us
to exercise judgment in making assumptions about future results,
including revenue and cash flow projections at the reporting
unit level and discount rates. We previously tested goodwill
annually on December 31. For fiscal year 2008 we completed
the goodwill impairment testing on October 1. This change
in timing was made to reduce conflict between the impairment
testing and our financial reporting close process for the fiscal
period ending December 31. It is our intention to continue
to complete subsequent goodwill impairment testing on October 1
going forward. This change in accounting policy was applied on a
retrospective basis and had no impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
Related
Parties
We may receive consulting and advisory services provided by the
principals or employees of companies owned or operated by our
directors (the Sponsors) with respect to the organization of our
companies employee benefit and compensation arrangements, and
other matters, and no fee is charged for these consulting and
advisory services.
In order for the Sponsors to provide such advice and consulting
we provide reports, financial data and other information. This
permits them to consult with and advise our management on
matters relating to our operations, company affairs and
finances. In addition this permits them to visit and inspect any
of our properties and facilities. The transactions are in the
normal course of operations and are measured at the exchange
amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related
parties.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Policies
Financial
Instruments Disclosure and Presentation
Effective April 1, 2008, we prospectively adopted the
Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA)
Sections 3862, Financial Instruments
Disclosures, which replaces CICA 3861 and provides
expanded disclosure requirements that enable users to evaluate
the significance of financial instruments on our financial
position and its performance and the nature and extent of risks
arising from financial instruments to which we are exposed
during the period and at the balance sheet, and how we manage
those risks. This standard harmonizes disclosures with
International Financial Reporting Standards. We have provided
the additional required disclosures in note 10 to its
interim consolidated financial statements for the three months
ended June 30, 2008.
Effective April 1, 2008, we adopted CICA issued Handbook
Section 3863, Financial Instruments
Presentation. This Section establishes standards for
presentation of financial instruments and non-financial
derivatives. It deals with the classification of financial
instruments, from the perspective of the issuer, between
liabilities and equity, the classification of related interest,
dividends, gains and losses, and the circumstances in which
financial assets and financial liabilities are offset. The
adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the
presentation of financial instruments in our financial
statements.
27
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
Capital
Disclosures
Effective April 1, 2008, we prospectively adopted CICA
Section 1535, Capital Disclosures, which
requires disclosure of qualitative and quantitative information
that enables users to evaluate our objectives, policies and
process for managing capital. We have provided the additional
required disclosures in our interim consolidated financial
statements for the three months ended June 30, 2008 (first
quarter of fiscal 2009).
Inventories
Effective April 1, 2008, we retrospectively adopted CICA
Section 3031, Inventories without restatement. This
standard requires inventories to be measured at the lower of
cost and net realizable value and provides guidance on the
determination of cost, including the allocation of overheads and
other costs to inventories, the requirement for an entity to use
a consistent cost formula for inventory of a similar nature and
use, and the reversal of previous write-downs to net realizable
value when there is subsequent increases in the value of
inventories. This new standard also clarifies that spare
component parts that do not qualify for recognition as property,
plant and equipment should be classified as inventory. Effective
April 1, 2008, we reversed a tire impairment that was
previously recorded at March 31, 2008 in other assets of
$1,383 with a corresponding decrease to opening deficit of
$991 net of future taxes of $392. We then reclassified
$5,086 of tires and spare component parts from other
assets to inventory. As at June 30, 2008,
inventory is comprised of tires and spare component parts of
$6,790 and job materials of $110. We carry inventory at the
lower of weighted average cost and net realizable value. The
carrying amount of inventories pledged as security for
borrowings under the revolving credit facility is approximately
$6,900 as at June 30, 2008.
Going
Concern
Effective April 1, 2008, we prospectively adopted CICA
Section 1400, General Standards of Financial
Statement Presentation. These amendments require us to
assess our ability to continue as a going concern. When we are
aware of material uncertainties related to events or conditions
that may cast doubt on our ability to continue as a going
concern, those concerns must be disclosed. In assessing the
appropriateness of the going concern assumption, the standard
requires us to consider all available information about the
future, which is at least, but not limited to, twelve months
from the balance sheet date. The adoption of this standard did
not have a material impact on the presentation and disclosures
with our consolidated financial statements.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
In February 2008, the CICA issued Section 3064,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, replacing
Section 3062, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets and Section 3450, Research and
Development Costs. The new pronouncement establishes
standards for the recognition, measurement, presentation and
disclosure of goodwill subsequent to its initial recognition and
of intangible assets by profit-oriented enterprises. This new
standard is effective for our interim and annual consolidated
financial statements commencing April 1, 2009. We are
currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard.
|
|
G.
|
Forward-Looking
Information and Risk Factors
|
Forward-Looking
Information
This document contains forward-looking information that is based
on expectations and estimates as of the date of this document.
Our forward-looking information is information that is subject
to known and unknown risks and other factors that may cause
future actions, conditions or events to differ materially from
the anticipated actions, conditions or events expressed or
implied by such forward-looking information. Forward-looking
information is information that does not relate strictly to
historical or current facts, and can be identified by the use of
the future
28
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
tense or other forward-looking words such as
believe, expect, anticipate,
intend, plan, estimate,
should, may, could,
would, target, objective,
projection, forecast,
continue, strategy, intend,
position or the negative of those terms or other
variations of them or comparable terminology.
Examples of such forward-looking information in this document
include but are not limited to statements with respect to the
following, each of which is subject to significant risks and
uncertainties and is based on a number of assumptions which may
prove to be incorrect:
(a) the limited risk that royalty changes will cause our
customers to cancel, delay or reduce the scope of any
significant mining developments presently underway;
(b) the expected continued rapid growth of operators in the
oil sands business, their planned projects and our intention to
pursue and win business opportunities from these projects;
(c) our intention to increase our fleet size to be ready to
meet the challenges from the projected growth in oil sands;
(d) that acquisition opportunities will materialize that
will allow us to expand our complementary service offerings
which we will be able to cross-sell with our existing services;
(e) our intention to build on our relationships with our
existing oil sands customers to win a substantial share of the
heavy construction and mining, piling and pipeline services
outsourced in connection with these projects;
(f) our intention to increase our presence outside the oil
sands and extend our services to other resource industries
across Canada;
(g) the success of the enhancements to maintenance
practices resulting in improved availability through reduced
repair time and increased utilization of our equipment with a
consequent improvement in our revenue, margins and profitability;
(h) the amount of our backlog expected to be performed and
realized in the twelve months ending June 30, 2009;
(i) the expected growth in master services agreements
through 2009 and our continued work with Syncrude, Suncor and
Shell;
(j) the arrival of new major projects and our required
participation for work on these projects;
(k) the continued development of the oil sands and the
expectation that it will drive a significant portion of our 2009
revenue;
(l) the anticipated increased demand for our services at
Petro-Canadas Fort Hills site;
(m) our expected increased involvement with Baffinland Iron
Mines Corp.;
(n) demand for our piling services remaining strong in
fiscal 2009;
(o) the anticipated temporary slowdown in our pipeline
activity once the TMX project concludes in October 2008 and
significant long-term opportunities for this division;
(p) our expected generation of a net cash surplus in fiscal
2009;
(q) our operating and capital lease facilities and cash
flow from operations are sufficient to meet capital expenditure
requirements; and
(r) our ability to produce materially reliable estimates;
(s) our experience allows us to produce materially reliable
estimates.
29
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
Some of the risks and other factors which could cause results to
differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking
statements contained in this quarterly Managements
Discussion and Analysis include, but are not limited to:
The forward-looking information in paragraphs (a), (b), (j),
(k), (l), (m), (n) and (s) rely on certain market
conditions and demand for our services and are based on the
assumptions that; the global economy remains strong and the
demand for commodities, particularly oil, remains high; high
demand for commodities results in strong prices which drive the
development of Canadas natural resources, in particular
the oil sands; the oil sands continue to be an economically
viable source of energy and our customers and potential
customers continue to invest in the oil sands and other natural
resources developments; our customers and potential customers
will continue to outsource the type of activities for which we
are capable of providing service; and the Western Canadian
economy continues to develop with additional investment in
commercial and public construction; and are subject to the risks
and uncertainties that:
|
|
|
|
|
anticipated major projects in the oil sands may not materialize;
|
|
|
|
demand for our services may be adversely impacted by regulations
affecting the energy industry;
|
|
|
|
failure by our customers to obtain required permits and licenses
may affect the demand for our services;
|
|
|
|
changes in our customers perception of oil prices over the
long-term could cause our customers to defer, reduce or stop
their investment in oil sands projects, which would, in turn,
reduce our revenue from those customers;
|
|
|
|
insufficient pipeline, upgrading and refining capacity or lack
of sufficient governmental infrastructure to support growth in
the oil sands region could cause our customers to delay, reduce
or cancel plans to construct new oil sands projects or expand
existing projects, which would, in turn, reduce our revenue from
those customers;
|
|
|
|
a change in strategy by our customers to reduce outsourcing
could adversely affect our results;
|
|
|
|
cost overruns by our customers on their projects may cause our
customers to terminate future projects or expansions which could
adversely affect the amount of work we receive from those
customers;
|
|
|
|
because most of our customers are Canadian energy companies, a
downturn in the Canadian energy industry could result in a
decrease in the demand for our services;
|
|
|
|
shortages of qualified personnel or significant labour disputes
could adversely affect our business; and
|
|
|
|
unanticipated short term shutdowns of our customers
operating facilities may result in temporary cessation or
cancellation of projects in which we are participating.
|
The forward-looking information in paragraphs (c), (d), (e),
(f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), (m), (n), (o), (p), (q),
(r) and (s) rely on our ability to execute our growth
strategy and are based on the assumptions that the management
team can successfully manage the business; we can maintain and
develop our relationships with our current customers; we will be
successful in developing relationships with new customers; we
will be successful in the competitive bidding process to secure
new projects; that we will identify and implement improvements
in our maintenance and fleet management practices; and are
subject to the risks and uncertainties that:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to grow our operations in the future may be hampered
by our inability to obtain long lead time equipment and tires,
which are currently in limited supply;
|
|
|
|
if we are unable to obtain surety bonds or letters of credit
required by some of our customers, our business could be
impaired;
|
30
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
we are dependent on our ability to lease equipment, and a
tightening of this form of credit could adversely affect our
ability to bid for new work
and/or
supply some of our existing contracts;
|
|
|
|
our business is highly competitive and competitors may outbid us
on major projects that are awarded based on bid proposals;
|
|
|
|
our customer base is concentrated, and the loss of or a
significant reduction in business from a major customer could
adversely impact our financial condition;
|
|
|
|
lump-sum and unit-price contracts expose us to losses when our
estimates of project costs are lower than actual costs;
|
|
|
|
our operations are subject to weather-related factors that may
cause delays in our project work;
|
|
|
|
environmental laws and regulations may expose us to liability
arising out of our operations or the operations of our
customers; and
|
|
|
|
many of our senior officers have either recently joined the
company or have just been promoted and have only worked together
as a management team for a short period of time.
|
While we anticipate that subsequent events and developments may
cause our views to change, we do not have an intention to update
this forward-looking information, except as required by
applicable securities laws. This forward-looking information
represents our views as of the date of this document and such
information should not be relied upon as representing our views
as of any date subsequent to the date of this document. We have
attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual
results, performance or achievements to vary from those current
expectations or estimates expressed or implied by the
forward-looking information. However, there may be other factors
that cause results, performance or achievements not to be as
expected or estimated and that could cause actual results,
performance or achievements to differ materially from current
expectations. There can be no assurance that forward-looking
information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and
future events could differ materially from those expected or
estimated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not
place undue reliance on forward-looking information. These
factors are not intended to represent a complete list of the
factors that could affect us. See Risk Factors below
and risk factors highlighted in materials filed with the
securities regulatory authorities filed in the United States and
Canada from time to time, including, but not limited to, our
most recent annual managements discussion and analysis.
Risks
Factors
For first quarter of fiscal 2009 other than noted below, there
has been no significant change in our risk factors from those
described in Managements Discussion and Analysis
referenced in
Form 40-F
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008. For a detailed
discussion of these risk factors see Risk Factors in
our Management Discussion and Analysis for the year ended
March 31, 2008, available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
As previously disclosed, the key financial reporting risks
include:
Foreign
currency risk
We are subject to currency exchange risk as our
83/4% senior
notes are denominated in U.S. dollars and all of our
revenues and most of our expenses are denominated in Canadian
dollars. To manage the foreign currency risk and potential cash
flow impact on our $200 million in
U.S. dollar-denominated notes, we have entered into
currency swap and interest rate swap agreements. These financial
instruments consist of three components: a U.S. dollar
interest rate swap; a U.S. dollar-Canadian dollar
cross-currency basis swap; and a Canadian dollar interest rate
swap. The cross currency and interest rate swap agreements can
be cancelled at the counterpartys option at any time after
December 1, 2007 if the counterparty pays a cancellation
premium. The premium is equal to 4.375% of the
31
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
US$200 million if exercised between December 1, 2007
and December 1, 2008; 2.1875% if exercised between
December 1, 2008 and December 1, 2009; and repurchased
at par if cancelled after December 1, 2009.
Interest
rate risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk on the revolving credit
facility, capital lease obligations and certain operating leases
with a variable payment that is tied to prime rates. We do not
use derivative financial instruments to reduce our exposure to
these risks. The estimated financial impact as a result of
fluctuations in interest rates is not significant for the
revolving credit facility, capital lease obligations and certain
operating leases.
In conjunction with the cross-currency swap agreement we entered
into a U.S. dollar interest rate swap and a Canadian dollar
interest rate swap with the net effect of economically
converting the 8.75% rate payable on the
83/4% senior
notes into a fixed rate of 9.765% for the duration that the
83/4% senior
notes were outstanding. On May 19, 2005 in connection with
our Companys new revolving credit facility at that time,
this fixed rate was increased to 9.889%. These derivative
financial instruments were not designated as a hedge for
accounting purposes.
At June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, the notional
principal amounts of the interest rate swaps were
US$200 million and Canadian $263 million.
As at June 30, 2008, holding all other variables constant,
a 1% increase (decrease) to Canadian interest rates would impact
the fair value of the interest rate swaps by $7,038 with this
change in fair value being recorded in net income. As at
June 30, 2008, holding all other variables constant, a 1%
increase (decrease) to US interest rates would impact the fair
value of the interest rate swaps by $3,292 with this change in
fair value being recorded in net income. As at June 30,
2008, holding all other variables constant, a 1% increase
(decrease) to Canadian to US interest rate volatility would
impact the fair value of the interest rate swaps by $2,105 with
this change in fair value being recorded in net income.
Inflation
Inflation can have a material impact on our operations due to
increasing parts, equipment replacement and labour costs;
however, many of our contracts contain provisions for annual
price increases. Inflation can have a material impact on our
operations if the rate of inflation and cost increases remains
above levels that we are able to pass to our customers.
Credit
risk
Credit risk is the financial loss to us if a customer or
counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its
contractual obligations. We are exposed to credit risk through
our cash and equivalents, accounts receivable and unbilled
revenue. We managed the credit risk associated with our cash and
cash equivalents by holding our funds with reputable financial
institutions. Credit risk for trade and other accounts
receivables and unbilled revenue are managed through established
credit monitoring activities. We review our trade receivable
accounts regularly for collectability and payment performance.
We have a concentration of customers in the oil and gas sector.
The concentration risk is mitigated by the customers being large
investment grade organizations. Losses under trade accounts
receivable have historically been insignificant. Decisions to
extend credit to new customers are approved by management.
32
NORTH
AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Managements
Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
History
and Development of the Company
NACG Holdings Inc. (Holdings) was formed in October 2003 in
connection with the Acquisition discussed below. Prior to the
Acquisition, NACG Holdings Inc. had no operations or significant
assets and the Acquisition was primarily a change of ownership
of the businesses acquired.
On October 31, 2003, two wholly owned subsidiaries of
Holdings, as the buyers, entered into a purchase and sale
agreement with Norama Ltd. and one of its subsidiaries, as the
sellers. On November 26, 2003, pursuant to the purchase and
sale agreement, Norama Ltd. sold to the buyers the businesses
comprising North American Construction Group in exchange for
total consideration of approximately $405.5 million, net of
cash received and including the impact of certain post-closing
adjustments (the Acquisition). The businesses we acquired from
Norama Ltd. have been in operation since 1953. Subsequent to the
Acquisition, we have operated the businesses in substantially
the same manner as prior to the Acquisition.
On November 28, 2006, prior to the consummation of the
initial public offering (IPO) discussed below, Holdings
amalgamated with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, NACG Preferred
Corp and North American Energy Partners Inc. The amalgamated
entity continued under the name North American Energy Partners
Inc. The voting common shares of the new entity, North American
Energy Partners Inc., were the shares sold in the IPO and
related secondary offering. On November 28, 2006, we
completed the IPO in the United States and Canada of 8,750,000
voting common shares and a secondary offering of 3,750,000
voting common shares for $18.38 per share (U.S. $16.00 per
share).
On November 22, 2006 our common shares commenced trading on
the New York Stock Exchange and on the Toronto Stock Exchange on
an if, as and when issued basis. On
November 28, 2006, our common shares became fully tradable
on the Toronto Stock Exchange.
Net proceeds from the IPO were $140.9 million (gross
proceeds of $158.5 million, less underwriting discounts and
costs and offering expenses of $17.6 million). On
December 6, 2006, the underwriters exercised their option
to purchase an additional 687,500 common shares from us. The net
proceeds from the exercise of the underwriters option were
$11.7 million (gross proceeds of $12.6 million, less
underwriting fees of $0.9 million). Total net proceeds were
$152.6 million (total gross proceeds of $171.1 million
less total underwriting discounts and costs and offering
expenses of $18.5 million).
As of June 30, 2008, our authorized capital consists of an
unlimited number of voting and non-voting common shares, of
which 36,036,476 voting common shares were issued and
outstanding (35,929,476 as at March 31, 2008).
Our head office is located at Zone 3, Acheson Industrial Area,
2 53016 Hwy 60, Acheson, Alberta, T7X 5A7. Our
telephone and facsimile numbers are
(780) 960-7171
and
(780) 960-7103,
respectively.
Additional
Information
Additional information relating to us, including our Annual
Information Form dated June 20, 2008, can be found on the
Canadian Securities Administrators System for Electronic
Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) database at
www.sedar.com and the website of the Securities and
Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.
33
FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
I, Rodney J. Ruston, the President and Chief Executive Officer
of North American Energy Partners Inc., certify that:
|
|
1.
|
I have reviewed the interim filings (as this term is defined in
Multilateral Instrument
52-109
Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and
Interim Filings) of North American Energy Partners Inc. (the
issuer) for the interim period ending June 30,
2008;
|
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, the interim filings do not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a
statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under
which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the
interim filings;
|
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the interim financial statements together
with the other financial information included in the interim
filings fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer,
as of the date and for the periods presented in the interim
filings;
|
|
4.
|
The issuers other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for
the issuer, and we have:
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused them
to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance that material information relating to the issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which the interim filings are being prepared; and
|
|
|
(b)
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with the issuers GAAP; and
|
|
|
5. |
I have caused the issuer to disclose in the interim MD&A
any change in the issuers internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the issuers most recent
interim period that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control
over financial reporting.
|
Date: August 13, 2008
/s/ Rodney J. Ruston
Name: Rodney J. Ruston
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
33
FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
I, Peter R. Dodd, the Chief Financial Officer of North American
Energy Partners Inc., certify that:
|
|
1.
|
I have reviewed the interim filings (as this term is defined in
Multilateral Instrument
52-109
Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and
Interim Filings) of North American Energy Partners Inc. (the
issuer) for the interim period ending June 30,
2008;
|
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, the interim filings do not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a
statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under
which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the
interim filings;
|
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the interim financial statements together
with the other financial information included in the interim
filings fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer,
as of the date and for the periods presented in the interim
filings;
|
|
4.
|
The issuers other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for
the issuer, and we have:
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused them
to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance that material information relating to the issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which the interim filings are being prepared; and
|
|
|
(b)
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with the issuers GAAP; and
|
|
|
5. |
I have caused the issuer to disclose in the interim MD&A
any change in the issuers internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the issuers most recent
interim period that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control
over financial reporting.
|
Date: August 13, 2008
/s/ Peter R. Dodd
Name: Peter R. Dodd
Title: Chief Financial Officer