Trimble Navigation 10-K 12-29-2006
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 29, 2006

OR

¨    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___________to______________
Commission File Number: 0-18645

TRIMBLE NAVIGATION LIMITED
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 
California
  
94-2802192
  
 
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
  
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
  

 
935 Stewart Drive, Sunnyvale, CA
 
94085
  
 
(Address of principal executive offices)
  
(Zip Code)
  

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (408) 481-8000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
  Title of each class  
Name of each exchange on which stock registered
  
 
Common Stock
  
NASDAQ Global Select Market
  
 
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
  
NASDAQ Global Select Market
  
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.   
Yes    ¨    No     x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Yes    ¨    No     x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes    x    No    ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.
Large Accelerated Filer
x
Accelerated Filer
¨
Non-accelerated Filer
¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes    ¨    No     x

As of June 30, 2006, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $2.5 billion based on the closing price as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

Indicate the number of share outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
  
Outstanding at February 21, 2007
Common stock, no par value
  
59,099,854 shares
 
1

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain parts of Trimble Navigation Limited's Proxy Statement relating to the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 17, 2007 (the "Proxy Statement") are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2

SPECIAL NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are subject to the "safe harbor" created by those sections. The forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future results of Trimble Navigation Limited (“Trimble” or “The Company” or “We” or “Our” or “Us”) are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industries in which Trimble operates and the beliefs and assumptions of the management of Trimble. Discussions containing such forward-looking statements may be found in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "predicts," "potential," "continue," "expects," "anticipates," "future," "intends," "plans," "believes," "estimates," and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, levels of activity, performance, achievements and events to differ materially from those implied by such forward-looking statements, but are not limited to those discussed in this Report under the section entitled “Other Risk Factors” and elsewhere, and in other reports Trimble files with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), specifically the most recent reports on Form 8-K and Form 10-Q, each as it may be amended from time to time. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We reserve the right to update these statements for any reason, including the occurrence of material events. The risks and uncertainties under the caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Risks and Uncertainties" contained herein, among other things, should be considered in evaluating our prospects and future financial performance. We have attempted to identify forward-looking statements in this report by placing an asterisk (*) before paragraphs containing such material.

3
 
TRIMBLE NAVIGATION LIMITED

2006 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
PART I
  
Item 1
5
Item 1A
16
Item 1B
23
Item 2
23
Item 3
23
Item 4
24
     
 
PART II
  
Item 5
24
Item 6
25
Item 7
26
Item 7A
40
Item 8
42
Item 9
76
Item 9A
76
Item 9B
76
   
 
 
PART III
  
Item 10
77
Item 11
77
Item 12
77
Item 13
77
Item 14
77
     
 
PART IV
  
Item 15
78-83
 

TRADEMARKS

Trimble, the globe and triangle logo, EZ-Guide, GeoExplorer, AgGPS, Spectra Precision, Autopilot, Fieldport, Copernicus, Recon, TrimTrac, EZ-Steer, and Force, among others are trademarks of Trimble Navigation Limited and its subsidiaries. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.


PART I

Item 1
Business

Trimble Navigation Limited, a California corporation (“Trimble” or “the Company” or “we” or “our” or “us”), provides advanced positioning product solutions, typically to commercial and government users. The principle applications served include surveying, agriculture, machine guidance, construction alignment, asset and fleet management, and telecommunications infrastructure. Our products provide benefits that can include lower operational costs, and higher productivity. Examples of products include systems that guide agricultural and construction equipment, surveying instruments, systems that track fleets of vehicles, and data collection systems that enable the management of large amounts of geo-referenced information. In addition, we also manufacture components for in-vehicle navigation and telematics systems, and timing modules used in the synchronization of wireless networks.

Trimble products often combine knowledge of location or position together with a wireless link to provide a solution for a specific application. Position is provided through a number of technologies including the Global Positioning System (GPS) and systems that use laser or optical technologies to establish position. Wireless communication techniques include both public networks, such as cellular, and private networks, such as business band radio. Our products are augmented by our software; this includes embedded firmware that enables the positioning solution and applications software that allows the customer to make use of the positioning information.

We design and market our own products. Our manufacturing strategy includes a combination of in-house assembly and third party subcontractors. Our global operations include major development, manufacturing or logistics operations in the United States, Sweden, Germany, New Zealand, France, Canada, the Netherlands, and India. Products are sold through dealers, representatives, joint ventures, and other channels throughout the world. These channels are supported by our sales offices located in more than 15 countries.

We began operations in 1978 and incorporated in California in 1981. Our common stock has been publicly traded on NASDAQ since 1990 under the symbol TRMB.

On January 17, 2007, Trimble’s Board of Directors approved a 2-for-1 split of all outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock, payable February 22, 2007 to stockholders of record on February 8, 2007. All shares and per share information presented has been adjusted to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis for all periods presented.

Technology Overview

A significant portion of our revenue is derived from applying Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology to terrestrial applications. The GNSS includes a network of 24 orbiting US based satellites and associated ground control that is funded and maintained by the U. S. Government and is available worldwide free of charge, a Russian satellite based system, and the future European Galileo system. GNSS positioning is based on a technique that precisely measures distances from four or more satellites. The satellites continuously transmit precisely timed radio signals using extremely accurate atomic clocks. A GNSS receiver measures distances from the satellites in view by determining the travel time of a signal from the satellite to the receiver, and then uses those distances to compute its position. Under normal circumstances, a stand-alone GNSS receiver is able to calculate its position at any point on earth, in the earth's atmosphere, or in lower earth orbit, to approximately 10 meters, 24 hours a day. Much better accuracies are possible through a technique called “differential GNSS.” In addition to providing position, GNSS provides extremely accurate time measurement.

GNSS accuracy is dependent upon the locations of the receiver and the number of GNSS satellites that are above the horizon at any given time. Reception of GNSS signals requires line-of-sight visibility between the satellites and the receiver, which can be blocked by buildings, hills, and dense foliage. The receiver must have a line of sight to at least four satellites to determine its latitude, longitude, attitude (angular orientation), and time. The accuracy of GNSS may also be limited by distortion of GNSS signals from ionospheric and other atmospheric conditions.

Our GNSS products are based on proprietary receiver technology. Over time, the advances in positioning, wireless communication, and information technologies have enabled us to add more capability to our products and thereby deliver more value to our users. For example, the developments in wireless technology and deployments of next generation wireless networks have enabled less expensive wireless communications. These developments allow for the efficient transfer of position data to locations away from the positioning field device, allowing the data to be accessed by more users and thereby increasing productivity. This has allowed us to include a wireless link in many of our products and connect remote field operations to a central location.


Our laser and optical products either measure distances and angles to provide a position in three dimensional space or they provide highly accurate laser references from which position can be established. The key element of these products is typically a laser, which is generally a commercially available laser diode and a complex mechanical assembly. These elements are augmented by software algorithms.
 
Business Strategy 
 
Our business strategy is developed around an analysis of several key elements:
 
 
·
Attractive markets - We focus on underserved markets that offer potential for revenue growth, profitability, and market leadership.

 
·
Innovative solutions that provide significant benefits to our customers - We seek to apply our technology to applications in which position data is important and where we can create unique value by enabling enhanced productivity in the field or field to back office. We look for opportunities in which the rate of technological change is high and which have a requirement for the integration of multiple technologies into a solution.

 
·
Distribution channels to best access our markets - We select distribution channels that best serve the needs of individual markets. These channels can include independent dealers, direct sales, joint ventures, OEM sales, and distribution alliances with key partners. We view international expansion as an important element of our strategy and seek to develop international channels.

Business Segments and Markets

We are organized into four reporting segments encompassing our various applications and product lines: Engineering and Construction, Field Solutions, Mobile Solutions and Advanced Devices. Our segments are distinguished by the markets they serve. Each segment consists of businesses which are responsible for product development, marketing, sales, strategy, and financial performance.

In the first quarter of 2006, Trimble combined the operating results of the former Components Technologies and Portfolio Technologies segments and included the combined operating results in the Advanced Devices segment. The change in presentation was made in recognition of the small size of each of the businesses relative to the total company. The presentation of prior period’s segment operating results has been conformed to the Company’s current segment presentation.

Engineering and Construction

Products in the Engineering and Construction segment improve productivity and accuracy throughout the entire construction process including the initial survey, planning, design, site preparation, and building phases. Our products are intended to both improve the productivity of each phase, as well as facilitate the entire process by improving information flow from one step to the next.

The product solutions typically include multiple technologies. The elements of these solutions may incorporate GPS, optical, laser, radio or cellular communications.
 
An example of the customer benefits provided by our product is our GPS and robotic optical surveying instruments which enable the surveyor to perform operations in the field faster, more reliably than conventional surveying instruments and with a smaller crew. Similarly, our construction machine guidance products allow the operator to achieve the desired landform while eliminating stakeout and reducing rework. These steps in the construction process can be readily linked together with data collection modules to minimize the time and effort required to maintain data accuracy throughout the entire construction process.

We sell and distribute our products in this segment through a global network of independent dealers that are supported by Trimble personnel. This channel is supplemented by relationships that create additional channel breadth including our joint ventures with Caterpillar, Nikon, and private branding arrangements with other companies.


We also design and market handheld data collectors and data collection software for field use by surveyors, contractors, and other professionals. These products are sold directly, through dealers, and other survey manufacturers.

Competitors in this segment are typically companies that provide optical, laser, or GPS positioning products. Our principal competitors are Topcon Corporation and Leica Geosystems. Price points in this segment range from less than $1,000 for certain laser systems to approximately $125,000 for a high-precision, three-dimensional, machine control system.

Representative products sold in this segment include:

Trimble® S6 Total Station - The Trimble S6 Total Station is a technologically advanced optical surveying system. Its advanced servo motors make the Trimble S6 fast, silent, and precise, allowing surveyors to measure points and collect data in the field efficiently and productively. The Trimble S6 offers unique new Trimble technologies that enable cable-free operation, longer battery life, and accuracy assurance, among many other features. Its detachable Trimble CU controller is utilized to effectively collect, display, and manage field data. 

Trimble® VX™ Spatial Station - Trimble VX Spatial Station is an advanced positioning system that combines optical, 3D scanning and video capabilities—Trimble VISION™ technology—to measure objects in 3D to produce 2D and 3D data sets for spatial imaging projects. The Trimble VX Spatial Station enables users to blend extremely accurate ground-based information with airborne data to provide comprehensive datasets for use in the geospatial information industry.

GCS family of Grade Control Systems - Grade control systems meet construction contractors' needs with productivity-enhancing solutions for earthmoving, site prep and roadwork. The Trimble GCS family provides upgrade options that deliver earthmoving contractors the flexibility to select a system that meets their daily needs today, and later add on to meet their changing needs. For example, a single control system such as the GCS300 can provide for low-cost point of entry into grade control, and over time can be upgraded to the GCS400 dual sensor system, or to the full 3D GCS900 Grade Control System.

Spectra Precision® Laser portable tools - Our Spectra Precision Laser portfolio includes a broad range of laser based tools for the interior, drywall and ceilings, HVAC, and mechanical contractor. Designed to replace traditional methods of measurement and leveling for a wide range of interior construction applications, our laser tools are easy to learn and use. Our Spectra Precision Laser product portfolio includes rotating lasers for horizontal leveling and vertical alignment, as well as laser pointers and a laser based distance measuring devices. They are available through independent and national construction supply houses both in the US and in Europe.

Proliance® - Proliance® allows infrastructure-intensive organizations to optimize the Plan-Build-Operate project lifecycle for complex capital projects, construction and real estate programs, and extensive facility portfolios. Proliance was designed for large building owner/operators, real estate developers and engineering-driven organizations managing $250M or more annually in new project construction or facility renovations.
 
Field Solutions

Our Field Solutions segment addresses the agriculture and geographic information system (GIS) markets.

Our agriculture products consist of manual and automated navigation guidance for tractors and other farm equipment used in spraying, planting, cultivation, and harvesting applications. The benefits to the farmer include faster machine operation, higher yields, and lower consumption of chemicals than conventional equipment. We also provide positioning solutions for leveling agricultural fields in irrigation applications and aligning drainage systems to better manage water flow in fields.

In 2006, Field Solutions entered the agricultural flow controls market with the introduction of the AgGPS® EZ-Boom™ 2010 automated application control system. The new system is designed to help growers cut input costs and reduce operator fatigue by providing precise automatic control of field spraying applications. The AgGPS EZ-Boom 2010 system provides both application flow control and automatic boom section control that integrates with the Trimble AgGPS EZ-Guide® Plus and/or Field Manager™ display.  The combination of the AgGPS EZ-Boom 2010 system and EZ-Guide Plus Field Manager display allows the user to consolidate guidance, flow control, and precision agriculture functions into one integrated package controlling up to 10 boom sections automatically with GPS guidance. 


We use multiple distribution channels to access the agricultural market, including independent dealers and partners such as CNH Global. Competitors in this market are either vertically integrated implement companies such as John Deere, or agricultural instrumentation suppliers such as Raven, CSI Wireless and Autofarm.

Our Mapping and GIS product line is centered on handheld data collectors that gather information in the field to be incorporated into GIS databases. Typically this information includes features, attributes, and positions of fixed infrastructure and natural resource assets. An example would be that of a utility company performing a survey of its transmission poles including the age and condition of each telephone pole. Our handheld unit enables this data to be collected and automatically stored while confirming the location of the asset. The data can then be downloaded into a GIS database. This stored data could later be used to navigate back to any individual asset or item for maintenance or data update. Our mobile GIS initiative goes one step further by allowing this information to be communicated from the field worker to the back-office GIS database through the combination of wireless technologies, as well as giving the field worker the ability to download information from the database. This capability provides significant advantages to users including improved productivity, accuracy and access to the information in the field.

Distribution for GIS products is primarily through a network of independent dealers and business partners, supported by Trimble personnel. Primary markets for our GIS products and solutions include both governmental and commercial users. Government users are most often municipal governments and natural resource agencies. Commercial users include utility companies. Competitors in this market are typically survey instrument companies utilizing GPS technology. Two examples are Topcon and Thales.

Approximate product price points in this segment range from $3,000 for a GIS handheld unit to $35,000 for a fully automated, farm equipment control system.

Representative products sold within this segment include:
 
AgGPS® EZ-Boom™ 2010 - The AgGPS EZ-Boom 2010 automated application control system is designed to help growers cut input costs and reduce operator fatigue by providing precise automatic control of field spraying applications.  It works with the Trimble AgGPS EZ-Guide Plus lightbar guidance system, AgGPS EZ-Steer® assisted steering system or the AgGPS Autopilot™ automated steering system.
 
AgGPS® Autopilot™ System - A GPS-enabled, agricultural navigation system that connects to a tractor’s steering system and automatically steers the tractor along a precise path to within three centimeters or less. This enables both higher machine productivity and more precise application of seed and chemicals, thereby reducing costs to the farmer.

AgGPS® EZ-Steer® System - A value added assisted steering system, that when combined with the EZ-Guide Plus system, automatically steers agricultural vehicles along a path within 20 centimeters or less. This system installs in less than thirty minutes and is designed to reduce gaps and overlaps in spraying, fertilizing, and other field applications as well as reduce operator fatigue.

GeoExplorer® 2005 Series - Combines a GPS receiver in a rugged handheld unit running industry standard Microsoft Windows Mobile version 5.0, making it easy to collect and maintain data about objects in the field. The GeoExplorer series features three models ranging in accuracy from subfoot to 1-3 meters —allowing the user to select the system most appropriate for their data collection and maintenance needs.

Spacient® Fieldport® Software - Focuses on automating field service processes, operational efficiency and profitability for water and wastewater utility customers. Sales and distribution of Fieldport software solutions are direct to the customer. A Fieldport software installation involves a degree of integration and professional services.
 
 
Mobile Solutions
 
Our Mobile Solutions segment addresses solutions for vehicles and mobile workers by providing both hardware and software for managing mobile work, mobile workers and mobile assets. The software is provided in both a client server model or web based.  Our software is provided through our hosted platform for a monthly subscription service fee; or as a perpetual license with annual maintenance and support fees. 


Our vehicle solutions include an onboard computer consisting of a GPS receiver, business logic, sensor interface, and a cellular modem. Our solution includes the communication service to and from the vehicle to our data center and access over the Internet to the application software.
 
Our mobile worker solutions include a rugged PC and software.   The solutions will also include communication gateway for back office integration. 
  
One element of our market strategy targets opportunities in specific vertical markets where we believe we can provide a unique value to the end-user by tailoring our solutions for a particular industry.  Sample markets include Ready Mix Concrete, Direct Store Delivery and Public Safety.  Our ready mix concrete solution combines a suite of sensors with our in-vehicle wireless platform providing fleets with updated vehicle status that requires no driver interaction - referred to as “auto-status.” 
 
We also sell our vehicle solutions using a horizontal market strategy that focuses on providing turnkey solutions to a broad range of service fleets that span a large number of market segments. Here, we leverage our capabilities without the same level of customization. These solutions are sold to the general service fleets as well as transportation and distribution fleets both on a direct basis and through dealer channels.
 
Our enterprise strategy focuses on sales to large, enterprise accounts with more than 1,000 vehicles or routes. Here, in addition to a Trimble-hosted solution, we can also integrate our service directly into the customer’s IT infrastructure, giving them improved control of their information. In this market we sell directly to end-users. Sales cycles tend to be long due to field trials followed by an extensive decision-making process.
 
Approximate prices for hardware fall in the range of $400 to $4,000, while the monthly subscription service fees range from approximately $25 to approximately $55, depending on the customer service level.
 
We have also entered into new markets by acquisitions of Advanced Public Safety, Inc. (APS) and Visual Statement Inc. (VS).  APS provides mobile and handheld software products used by law enforcement, fire rescue and other public safety agencies.  VS provides desktop software and enterprise solutions for collision and crime incident analysis, reporting and workflow management.
 
Representative products sold in this segment include:
 
Trimble Fleet Productivity - Our fleet productivity solution offerings are comprised of the TrimView and TrimWeb mobile platforms. The TrimWeb system provides different levels of service that run from snapshots of fleet activity to real-time fleet dispatch capability via access to the web based platform through a secure internet connection. The TrimWeb system includes truck communication service and computer backbone support of the service. TrimView is sold to fleets where system integration into back office applications are  required for more robust information flow.
 
Trimble Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG)- This software solution operates in the Microsoft CE/Pocket or WinMobile PC environment and addresses the pre-sales, delivery, routes sales and full service vending functions performed by mobile workers.  Customers within the CPG market purchase a combination of both license software and handheld PCs.  The software handles all communications from/to the mobile computer as well as from/to the host and any other ERP or decision support systems. 
 
Trimble Public Safety - We provide a suite of solutions for the public safety sector including our Pocket Citation System which is an electronic ticketing system enables law enforcement officers to issue traffic citations utilizing a mobile handheld device. This system scans the traffic offender’s driver’s license and automatically populates the appropriate information into the citation. We also provide a variation of  this solution which enables law enforcement officers to complete electronic traffic citations in under 30 seconds. Within this sector we also provide desktop software which enables accident investigators and other public safety professionals to reconstruct and simulate vehicle accidents.


Advanced Devices

In the first quarter of 2006, we began reporting a new segment called Advanced Devices that combines our previously reported Component Technologies and Portfolio segments. This was done in recognition of the small size of each of the businesses comprising the new segment, relative to the total company. Advanced Devices includes the product lines from our Component Technologies, Applanix, Trimble Outdoors, and Military and Advanced Systems (MAS) businesses. It is helpful to recognize that with the exception of Trimble Outdoors and Applanix these businesses share several characteristics: they are hardware centric, generally rely on OEM distribution, and have products that can be utilized in a number of different end-user markets.


Within Component Technologies, we provide GPS-based components for applications that require embedded position or time to markets such as the telecommunications and automotive industries where we supply modules, boards, custom integrated circuits, or single application IP licenses to the customer according to the needs of the application. Sales are made directly to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and system integrators who incorporate our component into a sub-system or a complete system-level product. Component Technologies has developed GPS technologies which it is making available for license. These technologies can run on certain digital signal processors (DSP) or microprocessors removing the need for dedicated GPS baseband signal processor chips. Advanced Devices has an agreement with u-Nav Microelectronics to license Trimble GPS technology for u-Nav GPS chipsets. We also have a cooperative licensing deal with Nokia for Trimble's Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) patents related to designated wireless products and services involving location technologies, such as GPS, assisted GPS or Galileo. The licensing agreement is exclusive to Nokia for the wireless consumer product and service domain and includes sublicensing rights. In return, Trimble receives a non-exclusive license to Nokia’s location-based patents for use in Trimble's commercial products and services.

Our Applanix business develops, manufactures, sells and supports high-value, precision products that combine GPS with inertial sensors for accurate measurement of the position and attitude. Sales are made directly by our sales force to the end users or to systems integrators. Competitors include IGI in the airborne survey market, and iXsea and TSS in the marine survey market.

Our MAS business supplies GPS receivers and embedded modules that use the military’s GPS advanced capabilities. The modules are principally used in aircraft navigation and timing applications. Military products are sold directly to either the US Government or defense contractors. Sales are also made to authorized foreign end users. Competitors in this market include Rockwell Collins, L3, and Raytheon.
 
The Trimble Outdoors service utilizes GPS-enabled cell phones to provide information for outdoor recreational activities. Some of the recreational activities include hiking, biking, backpacking, boating, and water sports. Consumers purchase the Trimble Outdoors product through our wireless operator partners which include Sprint-Nextel, SouthernLINC Wireless and Boost Mobile. In 2005, Trimble entered into an agreement with Rodale Inc., owner of Backpacker Magazine, to bring high quality trip content to consumer GPS cell phones.

Representative products sold by this segment include:

Copernicus™ GPS Receiver-Copernicus is Trimble’s first product built upon the uNav Microelectonics GPS chipset. It is a full-function GPS receiver in a surface mount package the size of a postage stamp.

TrimTrac® Locator - Our TrimTrac product is a complete end user device that combines GPS functionality with global system for mobile communications (GSM) wireless communications. In 2006, we added to the TrimTrac locator full quad-band GSM and general packet radio service (GPRS) support along with several important application level features. The device is suitable for high volume personal vehicle and commercial asset management applications that demand a low-cost locator.

Applanix POS/AV™ - An integrated GPS/inertial system for airborne surveying that measures aircraft position to an accuracy of a few centimeters and aircraft attitude (angular orientation) to an accuracy of 30 arc seconds or better. This system is typically interfaced to large format cameras and scanning lasers for producing geo-referenced topographic maps of the terrain.

Applanix DSS™ 322 Digital Sensor System - A medium-format, digital aerial camera system with direct georeferencing capability designed for streamlined airborne digital image acquisition. Used for corridor surveys, photogrammetric mapping, GIS analysis and feature identification, and other airborne remote sensing applications requiring high-quality digital imagery.

Force™ 5 GS (GRAM-SAASM) Module - A dual frequency, embedded GPS module that is used in a variety of military airborne applications.


Trimble® Outdoors™ - Trip planning and navigation software that works with GPS-enabled cell phones and conventional GPS receivers. This software enables consumers to research specific trips online as part of trip pre-planning. In addition, users are able to share outdoor and off-road experiences online with their friends and family.


Acquisitions and Joint Ventures

Our growth strategy is centered on developing and marketing innovative and complete value-added solutions to our existing customers, while also marketing them to new customers and geographic regions. In some cases, this has led to partnering with or acquiring companies that bring technologies, products or distribution capabilities that will allow us to establish a market beach head, penetrate a market more effectively, or develop solutions more quickly than if we had done so solely through internal development. Since 1999, this has led us to form two joint ventures and acquire twenty one companies. Most of these acquisitions have been small both in dollar terms and in number of people added to the Trimble employee base. No assurance can be given that our previous or future acquisitions will be successful or will not materially adversely affect our financial condition or operating results.

@Road, Inc.

On February 16, 2007, we acquired @Road, Inc. of Fremont, California. @Road, Inc. is a global provider of solutions designed to automate the management of mobile resources and to optimize the service delivery process for customers across a variety of industries. @Road will be reported within our Mobile Solutions business segment. This acquisition was the largest in acquisition value in the company’s history. It significantly increases our presence in the mobile resource management, or MRM, market which Trimble believes is a large and fast growing market. 
 
* With the addition of @Road, Trimble’s TMS segment will be better able to service larger customers, with a broader and more robust solution set.

INPHO GmbH

On February 13, 2007, we acquired INPHO GmbH of Stuttgart, Germany. INPHO is a leader in photogrammetry and digital surface modeling for aerial surveying, mapping and remote sensing applications. INPHO will be reported within Trimble’s Engineering and Construction segment.

Spacient Technologies, Inc.

On November 21, 2006, we acquired privately-held Spacient Technologies, Inc. of Long Beach, California. Spacient is a leading provider of enterprise field service management and mobile mapping solutions for municipalities and utilities. Spacient’s performance is reported under our Field Solutions business segment.

Meridian Project Systems, Inc.

On November 7, 2006, we acquired privately-held Meridian Project Systems, Inc. of Folsom, California. Meridian provides enterprise project management and lifecycle software for optimizing the plan, build and operate lifecycle for real estate, construction and other physical infrastructure projects. Meridian’s performance is reported under our Engineering and Construction business segment.

XYZ Solutions, Inc.

On October 27, 2006, we acquired privately-held XYZ Solutions, Inc., of Alpharetta, Georgia. XYZ Solutions provides real-time, interactive 3D intelligence software to manage the spatial aspects of a construction project. XYZ Solutions’ performance is reported under our Engineering and Construction business segment.

Visual Statement, Inc.

On October 11, 2006, we acquired privately-held Visual Statement, Inc. of Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada. Visual Statement provides desktop software tools for crime and collision incident investigation, analysis, and reconstitution as well as state-wide enterprise solutions for reporting and analysis used by public safety agencies. Visual Statement’s performance is reported under our Mobile Solutions business segment.


BitWyse Solutions, Inc.

On May 1, 2006, we acquired the assets of privately-held BitWyse Solutions, Inc. of Salem, Massachusetts. BitWyse is a provider of engineering and construction information management software. BitWyse’s performance is reported under our Engineering and Construction business segment.

Eleven Technology, Inc.

On April 28, 2006, we acquired privately-held Eleven Technology, Inc. of Cambridge, Massachusetts. Eleven is a mobile application software company with a leading position in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry. Eleven’s performance is reported under our Mobile Solutions business segment.

Quantm International, Inc.

On April 5, 2006, we acquired privately-held Quantm International, Inc., a provider of transportation route optimization solutions used for planning highways, railways, pipelines and canals. Quantm’s performance is reported under our Engineering and Construction business segment.

XYZs of GPS, Inc.

On February 26, 2006, we acquired the assets of XYZs of GPS, Inc. of Dickerson, Maryland. XYZ develops real-time Global Navigation Satellite System or, GNSS, reference station, integrity monitoring and dynamic positioning software for meter, decimeter and centimeter applications. XYZs’ performance is reported under our Engineering and Construction business segment.


Patents, Licenses and Intellectual Property

We hold approximately 625 US patents and approximately 85 non-US patents, the majority of which cover GPS technology and other applications such as optical and laser technology.

We prefer to own the intellectual property used in our products, either directly or though subsidiaries. From time to time we license technology from third parties.

There are approximately 190 trademarks registered to Trimble and its subsidiaries including "Trimble," the globe and triangle logo, "AgGPS," "GeoExplorer," and "Recon," among others that are registered in the United States and other countries. Additional trademarks are pending registration.


Sales and Marketing

We tailor the distribution channel to the needs of our products and regional markets through a number of sales channel solutions around the world. We sell our products worldwide primarily through dealers, distributors, and authorized representatives, occasionally granting exclusive rights to market certain products within specific countries. This channel is supported and supplemented (where third party distribution is not available) by our regional sales offices throughout the world. We also utilize distribution alliances, OEM relationships and joint ventures with other companies as a means to serve selected markets.

During fiscal 2006, sales to customers in the United States represented 54%, Europe represented 25%, Asia Pacific represented 12% and other regions represented 9% of our total revenues. During fiscal 2005, sales to customers in the United States represented 54%, Europe represented 25%, Asia Pacific represented 11% and other regions represented 10% of our total revenues.

Warranty

The warranty periods for our products are generally between 90 days and three years. Selected military programs may require extended warranty periods up to 5.5 years and certain Nikon products have a five-year warranty period. We support our GPS products through a circuit board replacement program from locations in the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, and the United States. The repair and calibration of our non-GPS products are available from company-owned or authorized facilities. We reimburse dealers and distributors for all authorized warranty repairs they perform.


While we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of component suppliers, our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage, and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Should actual product failure rates, material usage, or service delivery costs differ from the estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty accrual and related costs may be required.

Seasonality of Business

*   Our individual segment revenues may be affected by seasonal buying patterns. Typically the second fiscal quarter has been the strongest quarter for the Company driven by the construction buying season.

Backlog

In most of our markets, the time between order placement and shipment is short. Orders are generally placed by customers on an as-needed basis. In general, customers may cancel or reschedule orders without penalty. For these reasons, we do not believe that orders are an accurate measure of backlog and, therefore, we believe that backlog is not a meaningful indicator of future revenues or material to an understanding of our business.

Manufacturing

Manufacturing of substantially all our GPS subsystems is subcontracted to Solectron Corporation. During fiscal 2006 we continued to utilize Solectron's Suzhou facilities in China for all of our Component Technologies products. During 2006 and 2004 we expanded our use of Solectron in Mexico for our Construction and Field Solutions products and handhelds, respectively. We continue to utilize Solectron California for our high-end GPS products and new product introduction services. Solectron is responsible for substantially all material procurement, assembly, and testing. We continue to manage product design through pilot production for the subcontracted products, and we are directly involved in qualifying suppliers and key components used in all our products. Our current contract with Solectron continues in effect until either party gives the other ninety days written notice.

We manufacture laser and optics-based products at our plants in Dayton, Ohio; Danderyd, Sweden; Jena and Kaiserslautern, Germany; and Toronto, Canada. Some of these products or portions of these products are also subcontracted to third parties for assembly.

Our design and manufacturing sites in Dayton, Ohio; Sunnyvale, California; Danderyd, Sweden; Jena and Kaiserslautern, Germany are registered to ISO9001:2000, covering the design, production, distribution, and servicing of all our products.

Research and Development

We believe that our competitive position is maintained through the development and introduction of new products that incorporate improved features, better performance, smaller size and weight, lower cost, or some combination of these factors. We invest substantially in the development of new products. We also make significant investment in the positioning, communication, and information technologies that underlie our products and will likely provide competitive advantages.

Our research and development expenditures, net of reimbursed amounts were $103.8 million for fiscal 2006, $84.3 million for fiscal 2005, and $77.6 million for fiscal 2004.

* We expect to continue investing in research and development with the goal of maintaining or improving our competitive position, as well as the goal of entering new markets.

Employees

As of December 29, 2006, we employed 2,842 employees, including 25% in sales and marketing, 36% in manufacturing, 28% in engineering, and 11% in general and administrative positions. Approximately 41% of employees are in locations outside the United States.

Our employees are not represented by unions except for those in Sweden and some in Germany. We also employ temporary and contract personnel that are not included in the above headcount numbers. We have not experienced work stoppages or similar labor actions.


Available Information

The Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports are available free of charge on the Company’s web site through www.trimble.com/investors.html, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information contained on our web site is not part of this annual report on Form 10-K.
 
In addition, you may request a copy of these filings (excluding exhibits) at no cost by writing or telephoning us at our principal executive offices at the following address or telephone number:

Trimble Navigation Limited
935 Stewart Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94085
Attention: Investor Relations Telephone: 408-481-8000


Executive Officers

The names, ages, and positions of the Company's executive officers as of February 22, 2007 are as follows:

Name
  
Age
 
Position
Steven W. Berglund
  
55
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
Rajat Bahri
  
42
  
Chief Financial Officer
Rick Beyer
  
49
  
Vice President, Mobile Solutions
Joseph F. Denniston, Jr.
  
46
  
Vice President, Operations
Bryn A. Fosburgh
  
44
  
Vice President, Engineering and Construction
Mark A. Harrington
  
51
  
Vice President, Strategy and Business Development
Debi Hirshlag
  
41
  
Vice President, Human Resources
John E. Huey
  
57
  
Treasurer
Irwin L. Kwatek
  
67
  
Vice President and General Counsel
Michael W. Lesyna
  
46
  
Vice President, Business Transformation
Bruce E. Peetz
  
55
  
Vice President, Advanced Technology and Systems
Julie Shepard
 
49
  
Vice President, Finance
Alan R. Townsend
  
58
  
Vice President, Field Solutions
Dennis L. Workman
  
62
  
Vice President and Chief Technical Officer, Advanced Devices

Steven W. Berglund - Steven Berglund has served as president and chief executive officer of Trimble since March 1999. Prior to joining Trimble, Mr. Berglund was president of Spectra Precision, a group within Spectra Physics AB, and a pioneer in the development of laser systems. He spent 14 years at Spectra Physics in a variety of senior leadership positions. In the early 1980s, Mr. Berglund spent a number of years at Varian Associates in Palo Alto, where he held a variety of planning and manufacturing roles. Mr. Berglund began his career as a process engineer at Eastman Kodak in Rochester, New York. He attended the University of Oslo and the University of Minnesota where he received a B.S. in chemical engineering. He later received his M.B.A. from the University of Rochester.

Rajat Bahri - Rajat Bahri joined Trimble as Chief Financial Officer in January 2005. Prior to joining Trimble, Mr. Bahri served for more than 15 years in various capacities within the financial organization of several subsidiaries of Kraft Foods, Inc. and General Foods Corporation. Most recently, he served as the chief financial officer for Kraft Canada, Inc. From June 2000 to June 2001 he served as chief financial officer of Kraft Pizza Company. From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Bahri was Operations Controller for Kraft Jacobs Suchard Europe. Mr. Bahri holds a Bachelor of Commerce from the University of Delhi in 1985 and an M.B.A. from Duke University in 1987. In 2005, he was elected on the board of Simple Technologies, Inc., a publicly traded company.

Rick Beyer - Rick Beyer joined Trimble in March 2004 as president of Trimble Mobile Solutions (TMS) and in May 2006, Mr. Beyer was appointed a Vice President of Trimble. Prior to joining Trimble, Mr. Beyer held senior executive positions within the wireless mobile solutions industry since 1987. Part of the original senior executive team that launched Qualcomm's OmniTRAC's mobile satellite communication solution, Mr. Beyer also held the positions of general manager at Rockwell Collins, on-board computing division, from 1994 to 1995; executive vice president of Norcom Networks from 1995 to 1999; president of Husky Technologies, now part of Itronix, from 1999 to 2000; and CEO of TracerNet, now Trimble Mobile Solutions, from 2002 to 2004. Mr. Beyer holds a B.A. from Olivet College and was Chairman of the Board at the college from 2000 to 2003. He was elected Trustee Emeritus in 2007. Rick also served as a member of the Council of Board Chairs for the Association of Governing Boards for Colleges and Universities from 2002 to 2005.


Joseph F. Denniston, Jr. - Joseph Denniston joined Trimble as vice president of operations in April 2001, responsible for worldwide manufacturing, distribution and logistics. Prior to Trimble, Mr. Denniston worked for 3Com Corporation. During his 14-year tenure, he served as vice president of supply chain management for the Americas and held several positions in test engineering, manufacturing engineering and operations. Previously at Sentry Schlumberger for seven years, he held several positions including production engineering, production management and test engineering over six years. Mr. Denniston received a B.S. in electrical engineering technology from the Missouri Institute of Technology in 1981 and an M.S. in computer science engineering from Santa Clara University in 1990.

Bryn A. Fosburgh - Bryn Fosburgh joined Trimble in 1994 as a technical service manager for surveying, mining, and construction. In 1997, Mr. Fosburgh was appointed director of development for the Company’s land survey business unit where he oversaw the development of field and office software that enabled the interoperability of Trimble survey products. From October 1999 to July 2002, he served as division vice president of survey and infrastructure. From 2002 to 2005, Mr. Fosburgh served as vice president and general manager of Trimble's Geomatics and Engineering (G&E) business area, with responsibility for all the division-level activities associated with survey, construction, and infrastructure solutions. In January 2005, he was appointed vice president and general manager of the Engineering and Construction Division. Prior to Trimble, he was a civil engineer with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation responsible for coordinating the planning, data acquisition, and data analysis for statewide GPS surveying projects in support of transportation improvement projects. He has also held various engineering, research and operational positions for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Defense Mapping Agency. Mr. Fosburgh received a B.S. in geology from the University of Wisconsin in Green Bay in 1985 and an M.S. in civil engineering from Purdue University in 1989.

Mark A. Harrington - Mark Harrington joined Trimble in January 2004 as vice president of strategy and business development. Prior to joining Trimble, Mr. Harrington served as vice president of finance at Finisar Corporation and chief financial officer for Cielo Communications, Inc., a photonics components manufacturer, from February 1998 to September 2002, and Vixel Corporation, a photonics manufacturer, from April 2003 to December 2003. His experience also includes 11 years at Spectra-Physics where he served in a variety of roles including vice president of finance for Spectra-Physics Lasers, Inc. and vice president of finance for Spectra-Physics Analytical, Inc. Mr. Harrington began his career at Varian Associates, Inc. where he held a variety of management and individual positions in finance, operations and IT. Mr. Harrington received his B.S. in Business Administration from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Debi Hirshlag - Debi Hirshlag joined Trimble in July 2005 as vice president of human resources. Prior to joining Trimble, Ms. Hirshlag served as vice president of human resources at Ariba Inc., a purchasing technology company from January 2003 to July 2004, and vice president of corporate services at Latitude Communications, a conferencing software provider from January 2001 to December 2002. In addition, she has held human resources positions at Seagate Technology, Inc., Pepsi-Cola and Amoco Corporation. Ms. Hirshlag received her B.S. in industrial management from Carnegie Mellon University and an M.A. in labor and industrial relations from the University of Illinois. 

John E. Huey - John Huey joined Trimble in 1993 as director corporate credit and collections, and was promoted to assistant treasurer in 1995 and treasurer in 1996. Past experience includes two years with ENTEX Information Services, five years with National Refractories and Minerals Corporation (formerly Kaiser Refractories), and thirteen years with Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Sales, Inc. He has held positions in credit management, market research, inventory control, sales, and as an assistant controller. Mr. Huey received his B.A. degree in Business Administration in 1971 from Thiel College in Greenville, Pennsylvania and an MBA in 1972 from West Virginia University in Morgantown, West Virginia.

Irwin L. Kwatek - Irwin Kwatek has served as vice president and general counsel of Trimble since November 2000. Prior to joining Trimble, Mr. Kwatek was vice president and general counsel of Tickets.com, a ticketing service provider, from May 1999 to November 2000. Prior to Tickets.com, he was engaged in the private practice of law for more than six years. During his career, he has served as vice president and general counsel to several publicly held high-tech companies including Emulex Corporation, Western Digital Corporation and General Automation, Inc. Mr. Kwatek received his B.B.A. from Adelphi College in Garden City, New York and an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. He received his J.D. from Fordham University in New York City in 1968.


Michael W. Lesyna -Michael Lesyna joined Trimble in September 1999 as vice president of strategic marketing. In September 2000, he was appointed vice president and general manager of the Mobile Solutions Division. In July 2004, Lesyna was appointed vice president of Business Transformation. In this cross-divisional role he focuses on driving operational improvements based on the marketing, sales and distribution channel strategies of Trimble's business segments. The scope of his work includes tailored business prioritization as well as lean manufacturing and lean overhead principles. Prior to Trimble, Mr. Lesyna spent six years at Booz Allen & Hamilton where he most recently served as a principal in the operations management group. Prior to Booz Allen & Hamilton, Mr. Lesyna held a variety of engineering positions at Allied Signal Aerospace. Mr. Lesyna received his M.B.A., as well as an M.S. and B.S. in mechanical engineering from Stanford University.

Bruce E. Peetz - Bruce Peetz has served as vice president of Advanced Technology and Systems since 1998 and has been with Trimble for 18 years. From 1996 to 1998, Mr. Peetz served as general manager of the Survey Business. Prior to joining Trimble, Mr. Peetz was a research and development manager at Hewlett-Packard for 10 years. Mr. Peetz received his B.S. in electrical engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Massachusetts in 1973.
 
Julie Shepard - Julie Shepard joined Trimble in December of 2006 as vice president of finance.  Ms. Shepard brings with her over 20 years of experience in a broad range of finance roles. She is responsible for Trimble's worldwide finance operations including financial planning, accounting, external reporting, and compliance. Most recently, Ms. Shepard served as vice president of finance and corporate controller at Quantum Corporation, from 2004 to 2006, and vice president of finance at Nishan Systems, from 2000 to 2003. Ms. Shepard began her career at Price Waterhouse and is a Certified Public Accountant. She received a B.S from California State University where she majored in Accounting.
 
Alan R. Townsend - Alan Townsend has served as vice president and general manager of the Field Solutions business area since November 2001. From 1995 to 2001, Mr. Townsend was general manager of Mapping and GIS. Mr. Townsend joined Trimble in 1991 as the manager of Trimble Navigation New Zealand Ltd. Prior to Trimble, Mr. Townsend held a variety of technical and senior management roles within the Datacom Group of companies in New Zealand including managing director of Datacom Software Research Ltd. from 1986 to 1991. In addition, Mr. Townsend is a director of IT Capital Ltd., a venture capital company based in Auckland, New Zealand. He is also a fellow of the New Zealand Institute of Management and a past president of the New Zealand Software Exporters Association. Mr. Townsend received a B.S.c in economics from the University of Canterbury in 1970.

Dennis L. Workman - Dennis Workman has served as vice president and general manager of Trimble’s Component Technologies segment since September 1999. From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Workman was senior director and chief technical officer of the newly formed Mobile and Timing Technologies (MTT) business group, also serving as general manager of Trimble's Automotive and Timing group. In 1997, he was director of engineering for Software & Component Technologies. Mr. Workman joined Trimble in 1995 as director of the newly created Timing vertical market. Prior to Trimble, Mr. Workman held various senior-level technical positions at Datum Inc. During his nine year tenure at Datum, he held the position of CTO. Mr. Workman received a B.S. in mathematics and physics from St. Mary’s College in 1967 and an M.S. in electrical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1969.

Item 1A.
Risk Factors.

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

You should carefully consider the following risk factors, in addition to the other information contained in this Form 10-K and in any other documents to which we refer you in this Form 10-K, before purchasing our securities. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face.

Our Inability to Accurately Predict Orders and Shipments May Affect Our Revenue, Expenses and Earnings per Share.

We have not been able in the past to consistently predict when our customers will place orders and request shipments so that we cannot always accurately plan our manufacturing requirements. As a result, if orders and shipments differ from what we predict, we may incur additional expenses and build excess inventory, which may require additional reserves and allowances. Any significant change in our customers’ purchasing patterns could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and reported earnings per share for a particular quarter.


Our Operating Results in Each Quarter May Be Affected by Special Conditions, Such As Seasonality, Late Quarter Purchases, Weather, and Other Potential Issues.

Due in part to the buying patterns of our customers, a significant portion of our quarterly revenues occurs from orders received and immediately shipped to customers in the last few weeks and days of each quarter, although our operating expenses tend to remain fairly predictable. Engineering and construction purchases tend to occur in early spring, and governmental agencies tend to utilize funds available at the end of the government’s fiscal year for additional purchases at the end of our third fiscal quarter in September of each year. Concentrations of orders sometimes also occur at the end of our other two fiscal quarters. Additionally, a majority of our sales force earns commissions on a quarterly basis which may cause concentrations of orders at the end of any fiscal quarter. If for any reason expected sales are deferred, orders are not received, or shipments are delayed a few days at the end of a quarter, our operating results and reported earnings per share for that quarter could be significantly impacted.

We Are Dependent on a Specific Manufacturer and Assembler for Many of Our Products and on Specific Suppliers of Critical Parts for Our Products.

We are substantially dependent upon Solectron Corporation in California, China and Mexico as our preferred manufacturing partner for many of our GPS products previously manufactured out of our Sunnyvale facilities. Under the agreement with Solectron, we provide to Solectron a twelve-month product forecast and place purchase orders with Solectron at least thirty calendar days in advance of the scheduled delivery of products to our customers depending on production lead time. Although purchase orders placed with Solectron are cancelable, the terms of the agreement would require us to purchase from Solectron all inventory not returnable or usable by other Solectron customers. Accordingly, if we inaccurately forecast demand for our products, we may be unable to obtain adequate manufacturing capacity from Solectron to meet customers’ delivery requirements or we may accumulate excess inventories, if such inventories are not usable by other Solectron customers. Our current contract with Solectron continues in effect until either party gives the other ninety days written notice.

In addition, we rely on specific suppliers for a number of our critical components. We have experienced shortages of components in the past. Our current reliance on specific or a limited group of suppliers involves several risks, including a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components and reduced control over pricing. Any inability to obtain adequate deliveries or any other circumstance that would require us to seek alternative sources of supply or to manufacture such components internally could significantly delay our ability to ship our products, which could damage relationships with current and prospective customers and could harm our reputation and brand, and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our Annual and Quarterly Performance May Fluctuate.

Our operating results have fluctuated and can be expected to continue to fluctuate in the future on a quarterly and annual basis as a result of a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Results in any period could be affected by:

·
changes in market demand,
·
competitive market conditions,
·
market acceptance of existing or new products,
·
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates,
·
the cost and availability of components,
·
our ability to manufacture and ship products,
·
the mix of our customer base and sales channels,
·
the mix of products sold,
·
our ability to expand our sales and marketing organization effectively,
·
our ability to attract and retain key technical and managerial employees,
·
the timing of shipments of products under contracts and
·
general global economic conditions.

In addition, demand for our products in any quarter or year may vary due to the seasonal buying patterns of our customers in the agricultural and engineering and construction industries. Due to the foregoing factors, our operating results in one or more future periods are expected to be subject to significant fluctuations. The price of our common stock could decline substantially in the event such fluctuations result in our financial performance being below the expectations of public market analysts and investors, which are based primarily on historical models that are not necessarily accurate representations of the future.


Our Gross Margin Is Subject to Fluctuation.

Our gross margin is affected by a number of factors, including product mix, product pricing, cost of components, foreign currency exchange rates and manufacturing costs. For example, sales of Nikon-branded products generally have lower gross margins as compared to our GPS survey products. Absent other factors, a shift in sales towards Nikon-branded products would lead to a reduction in our overall gross margins. A decline in gross margin could potentially negatively impact our earnings per share.

Failure to Maintain Effective Internal Controls in Compliance With Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Could Have an Adverse Effect on our Business and Stock Price.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to include an internal control report of management in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. For fiscal 2004, 2005, and 2006 we satisfied the requirements of Section 404, which requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our independent auditors addressing these assessments.

A system of controls, however well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the system will be met. In addition, the design of a control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of the inherent limitations of control systems, there is only reasonable assurance that our controls will succeed in achieving their stated goals under all potential future conditions.

We Are Dependent on New Products.

Our future revenue stream depends to a large degree on our ability to bring new products to market on a timely basis. We must continue to make significant investments in research and development in order to continue to develop new products, enhance existing products and achieve market acceptance of such products. We may incur problems in the future in innovating and introducing new products. Our development stage products may not be successfully completed or, if developed, may not achieve significant customer acceptance. If we were unable to successfully define, develop and introduce competitive new products, and enhance existing products, our future results of operations would be adversely affected. Development and manufacturing schedules for technology products are difficult to predict, and we might not achieve timely initial customer shipments of new products. The timely availability of these products in volume and their acceptance by customers are important to our future success. A delay in new product introductions could have a significant impact on our results of operations.

We Are Dependent on Proprietary Technology.

Our future success and competitive position is dependent upon our proprietary technology, and we rely on patent, trade secret, trademark and copyright law to protect our intellectual property. The patents owned or licensed by us may be invalidated, circumvented, and challenged. The rights granted under these patents may not provide competitive advantages to us. Any of our pending or future patent applications may not be issued within the scope of the claims sought by us, if at all.

Others may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our technology, duplicate our technology or design around the patents owned by us. In addition, effective copyright, patent and trade secret protection may be unavailable, limited or not applied for in certain countries. The steps taken by us to protect our technology might not prevent the misappropriation of such technology.

The value of our products relies substantially on our technical innovation in fields in which there are many current patent filings. We recognize that as new patents are issued or are brought to our attention by the holders of such patents, it may be necessary for us to withdraw products from the market, take a license from such patent holders, or redesign our products. We do not believe any of our products currently infringe patents or other proprietary rights of third parties, but we cannot be certain they do not do so. In addition, the legal costs and engineering time required to safeguard intellectual property or to defend against litigation could become a significant expense of operations. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our revenues or profitability.


Our Products May Contain Errors or Defects, which Could Result in Damage to Our Reputation, Lost Revenues, Diverted Development Resources and Increased Service Costs, Warranty Claims and Litigation.
 
Our devices are complex and must meet stringent requirements. We warrant that our products will be free of defect for various periods of time, depending on the product. In addition, certain of our contracts include epidemic failure clauses. If invoked, these clauses may entitle the customer to return or obtain credits for products and inventory, or to cancel outstanding purchase orders even if the products themselves are not defective.


We must develop our products quickly to keep pace with the rapidly changing market, and we have a history of frequently introducing new products. Products and services as sophisticated as ours could contain undetected errors or defects, especially when first introduced or when new models or versions are released. In general, our products may not be free from errors or defects after commercial shipments have begun, which could result in damage to our reputation, lost revenues, diverted development resources, increased customer service and support costs and warranty claims and litigation which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We Are Dependent on the Availability of Allocated Bands within the Radio Frequency Spectrum.

Our GPS technology is dependent on the use of the Standard Positioning Service (“SPS”) provided by the US Government’s GPS. The GPS SPS operates in radio frequency bands that are globally allocated for radio navigation satellite services. International allocations of radio frequency are made by the International Telecommunications Union (“ITU”), a specialized technical agency of the United Nations. These allocations are further governed by radio regulations that have treaty status and which may be subject to modification every two to three years by the World Radio Communication Conference.

Any ITU reallocation of radio frequency bands, including frequency band segmentation or sharing of spectrum, may materially and adversely affect the utility and reliability of our products. Many of our products use other radio frequency bands, together with the GPS signal, to provide enhanced GPS capabilities, such as real-time kinematic precision. The continuing availability of these non-GPS radio frequencies is essential to provide enhanced GPS products to our precision survey and construction machine controls markets. Any regulatory changes in spectrum allocation or in allowable operating conditions may cause a material adverse effect on our operating results.

In addition, unwanted emissions from mobile satellite services and other equipment operating in adjacent frequency bands or in-band from licensed and unlicensed devices may materially and adversely affect the utility and reliability of our products. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) continually receives proposals for novel technologies and services, such as ultra-wideband technologies, which may seek to operate in, or across, the radio frequency bands currently used by the GPS SPS and other public safety services. Adverse decisions by the FCC that result in harmful interference to the delivery of the GPS SPS and other radio frequency spectrum also used in our products may result in a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Many of Our Products Rely on GNSS technology, the GPS and other Satellite Systems

GNSS technology, GPS satellites and their ground support systems are complex electronic systems subject to electronic and mechanical failures and possible sabotage. The satellites currently in orbit were originally designed to have lives of 7.5 years and are subject to damage by the hostile space environment in which they operate. However, of the current deployment of 30 satellites in place, some have already been in operation for more than 12 years. To repair damaged or malfunctioning satellites is currently not economically feasible. If a significant number of satellites were to become inoperable, there could be a substantial delay before they are replaced with new satellites. A reduction in the number of operating satellites may impair the current utility of the GPS system and the growth of current and additional market opportunities.

In 2004, a Presidential policy affirmed a 1996 Presidential Decision Directive that marked the first time in the evolution of GPS that access for civilian use was free of direct user fees. In addition, Presidential policy has been complemented by corresponding legislation, that was signed into law. However, there can be no assurance that the U.S. Government will remain committed to the operation and maintenance of GPS satellites over a long period, or that the policies of the U.S. Government for the use of GPS without charge will remain unchanged. Because of ever-increasing commercial applications of GPS, other U.S. Government agencies may become involved in the administration or the regulation of the use of GPS signals. Any of the foregoing factors could affect the willingness of buyers of our products to select GPS-based systems instead of products based on competing technologies.

Many of our products also use signals from systems that augment GPS, such as the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) and National Differential GPS System (NDGPS). Many of these augmentation systems are operated by the federal government and rely on continued funding and maintenance of these systems. In addition, some of our products also use satellite signals from the Russian Glonass System. Any curtailment of the operating capability of these systems could result in decreased user capability thereby impacting our markets.


The European governments have begun development of an independent satellite navigation system, known as Galileo. We have access to the preliminary signal design, which is subject to change. Although an operational Galileo system is several years away, if we are unable to develop a timely commercial product, it may have a materially adverse effect on our business and operating results.

We may be Materially Affected by New Regulatory Requirements.
 
We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that govern our operations, including the handling and disposal of non-hazardous and hazardous wastes, and emissions and discharges into the environment. Failure to comply with such laws and regulations could result in costs for corrective action, penalties, or the imposition of other liabilities.

In particular, under certain of these laws and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of property may be liable for the costs of remediating hazardous substances or petroleum products on or from its property, without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or caused, the contamination, as well as incur liability to third parties impacted by such contamination. In addition, we face increasing complexity in our product design and procurement operations as we adjust to new and upcoming requirements relating to the materials composition of many of our products. The European Union (“EU”) adopted new directives to manage the use of hazardous materials and to facilitate the recycling of electrical and electronic equipment sold in the EU. One of these is the Restriction on the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (“RoHS”) directive. The RoHS directive restricts the use of lead, mercury and certain other substances in electrical and electronic products placed on the market in the European Union after July 1, 2006.

China adopted the Management Measures on Electronic Information Product Pollution Control to manage toxic and hazardous substances in electronic information products in 2006. Also known as “China RoHS,” the new regulations will require labeling of products containing toxic or hazardous substances placed on the Chinese market after March 1, 2007. Similar laws and regulations have been or may be enacted in other regions, including in the United States and Japan. Other environmental regulations may require us to reengineer our products to utilize components which are more environmentally compatible and such reengineering and component substitution may result in additional costs to us. Although we do not anticipate any material adverse effects based on the nature of our operations and the effect of such laws, there is no assurance that such existing laws or future laws will not have a material adverse effect on our business.
 
Our Business is Subject to Disruptions and Uncertainties Caused by War or Terrorism.

Acts of war or acts of terrorism could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition. The threat of terrorism and war and heightened security and military response to this threat, or any future acts of terrorism, may cause further disruption to our economy and create further uncertainties. To the extent that such disruptions or uncertainties result in delays or cancellations of orders, or the manufacture or shipment of our products, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
 
We Are Exposed to Fluctuations in Currency Exchange Rates.

A significant portion of our business is conducted outside the U.S., and as such, we face exposure to movements in non-U.S. currency exchange rates. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve and could have a material adverse impact on our financial results and cash flows. Fluctuation in currency impacts our operating results.

Currently, we hedge only those currency exposures associated with certain assets and liabilities denominated in non-functional currencies. The hedging activities undertaken by us are intended to offset the impact of currency fluctuations on certain non-functional currency assets and liabilities. Our attempts to hedge against these risks may not be successful resulting in an adverse impact on our net income.

We Face Risks in Investing in and Integrating New Acquisitions.

We have recently acquired a number of companies, including @Road, and intend to continue to acquire other companies. Acquisitions of companies entail numerous risks, including:
 

·
potential inability to successfully integrate acquired operations and products or to realize cost savings or other anticipated benefits from integration;
·
diversion of management’s attention from on-going business concerns;
·
loss of key employees of acquired operations;
·
the difficulty of assimilating geographically dispersed operations and personnel of the acquired companies;
·
the potential disruption of our ongoing business;
·
unanticipated expenses related to such integration;
·
the correct assessment of the relative percentages of in-process research and development expense that can be immediately written off as compared to the amount which must be amortized over the appropriate life of the asset;
·
the impairment of relationships with employees and customers of either an acquired company or our own business;
·
the potential unknown liabilities associated with acquired business;
·
inability to recover strategic investments in development stage entities; and
·
insufficient revenues to offset increased expenses associated with acquisitions.
 
As a result of such acquisitions, we have significant assets that include goodwill and other purchased intangibles. The testing of these intangibles under established accounting guidelines for impairment requires significant use of judgment and assumptions. Changes in business conditions could require adjustments to the valuation of these assets. In addition, losses incurred by a company in which we have an investment may have a direct impact on our financial statements or could result in our having to write-down the value of such investment. Any such problems in integration or adjustments to the value of the assets acquired could harm our growth strategy and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and compliance with debt covenants.

Our Debt Could Adversely Affect Our Cash Flow and Prevent Us from Fulfilling Our Obligations.

Upon consummation of the @Road acquisition, on February 20, 2007, we borrowed $250 million under an amended credit agreement and term loan which has increased our outstanding indebtedness and interest expense. Our debt could have important consequences, such as:

·
requiring us to dedicate a portion of our cash flow from operations and other capital resources to debt service, thereby reducing our ability to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other cash requirements;
·
increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;
·
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes and opportunities in, our industry, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage; and
·
limiting our ability to incur additional debt on acceptable terms, if at all.

Additionally, if we were to default under our amended credit agreement and were unable to obtain a waiver for such a default, interest on the obligations would accrue at an increased rate and the lenders could accelerate our obligations under the amended credit agreement, however that acceleration will be automatic in the case of bankruptcy and insolvency events of default.  Additionally, our subsidiaries that have guaranteed the amended credit agreement could be required to pay the full amount of our obligations under the amended credit agreement.  Any such action on the part of the lenders against us could have a materially adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We May Not Be Able to Enter Into or Maintain Important Alliances.

We believe that in certain business opportunities our success will depend on our ability to form and maintain alliances with industry participants, such as Caterpillar, Nikon, and CNH Global. Our failure to form and maintain such alliances, or the pre-emption of such alliances by actions of competitors or us, will adversely affect our ability to penetrate emerging markets. No assurances can be given that we will not experience problems from current or future alliances or that we will realize value from any such strategic alliances.

We Face Competition in Our Markets.

Our markets are highly competitive and we expect that both direct and indirect competition will increase in the future. Our overall competitive position depends on a number of factors including the price, quality and performance of our products, the level of customer service, the development of new technology and our ability to participate in emerging markets. Within each of our markets, we encounter direct competition from other GPS, optical and laser suppliers and competition may intensify from various larger U.S. and non-U.S. competitors and new market entrants, particularly from emerging markets such as China and India, some of which may be our current customers. The competition in the future may, in some cases, result in price reductions, reduced margins or loss of market share, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. We believe that our ability to compete successfully in the future against existing and additional competitors will depend largely on our ability to execute our strategy to provide systems and products with significantly differentiated features compared to currently available products. We may not be able to implement this strategy successfully, and our products may not be competitive with other technologies or products that may be developed by our competitors, many of whom have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing, sales and other resources than we do.


We Must Carefully Manage Our Future Growth.

Growth in our sales or continued expansion in the scope of our operations could strain our current management, financial, manufacturing and other resources, and may require us to implement and improve a variety of operating, financial and other systems, procedures, and controls. We have recently implemented a new enterprise resource planning software system and we may experience in our financial and order management processing as a result of new procedures. Problems associated with any improvement or expansion of these systems, procedures or controls may adversely affect our operations and these systems, procedures or controls may not be designed, implemented or improved in a cost-effective and timely manner. Any failure to implement, improve and expand such systems, procedures, and controls in a timely and efficient manner could harm our growth strategy and adversely affect our financial condition and ability to achieve our business objectives.

We Are Subject to the Impact of Governmental and Other Similar Certifications.

We market certain products that are subject to governmental and similar certifications before they can be sold. For example, CE certification for radiated emissions is required for most GPS receiver and data communications products sold in the European Union. An inability to obtain such certifications in a timely manner could have an adverse effect on our operating results. Also, some of our products that use integrated radio communication technology require product type certification and some products require an end user to obtain licensing from the FCC for frequency-band usage. These are secondary licenses that are subject to certain restrictions. An inability or delay in obtaining such certifications or changes to the rules by the FCC could adversely affect our ability to bring our products to market which could harm our customer relationships and have a material adverse effect on our business.

We Are Subject to the Adverse Impact of Radio Frequency Congestion.

We have certain products, such as GPS RTK systems, and surveying and mapping systems that use integrated radio communication technology requiring access to available radio frequencies allocated by the FCC (or the NTIA in the case of federal government users of this equipment) for which the end user is required to obtain a license in order to operate their equipment. In addition, access to these frequencies by state agencies is under management by state radio communications coordinators. Some bands are experiencing congestion that excludes their availability for access by state agencies in some states. To reduce congestion, the FCC announced that it will require migration of radio technology from wideband to narrowband operations in these bands. The rules require migration of users to narrowband channels by 2011. In the meantime congestion could cause FCC coordinators to restrict or refuse licenses. An inability to obtain access to these radio frequencies by end users could have an adverse effect on our operating results.

The Volatility of Our Stock Price Could Adversely Affect Your Investment in Our Common Stock.

The market price of our common stock has been, and may continue to be, highly volatile. During fiscal 2006, our stock price ranged from $17.51 to $26.18, on a post-split basis. We believe that a variety of factors could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate, perhaps substantially, including:

·  
announcements and rumors of developments related to our business or the industry in which we compete;
·  
quarterly fluctuations in our actual or anticipated operating results and order levels;
·  
general conditions in the worldwide economy, including fluctuations in interest rates;
·  
announcements of technological innovations;
· 
acquisition announcements; 
·  
new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors;
·  
developments in patents or other intellectual property rights and litigation;
·  
developments in our relationships with our customers and suppliers; and
·  
any significant acts of terrorism against the United States.


In addition, in recent years the stock market in general and the markets for shares of "high-tech" companies in particular, have experienced extreme price fluctuations which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of affected companies. Any such fluctuations in the future could adversely affect the market price of our common stock, and the market price of our common stock may decline.
 
Provisions in Our Charter Documents and Under California Law Could Prevent or Delay a Change of Control, which Could Reduce the Market Price of Our Common Stock.

Certain provisions of our articles of incorporation, as amended and restated, our bylaws, as amended and restated, and the California General Corporation Law may be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect and could discourage a third party from acquiring, or make it more difficult for a third party to acquire, control of us without approval of our board of directors. These provisions could also limit the price that certain investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. Certain provisions allow the board of directors to authorize the issuance of preferred stock with rights superior to those of the common stock.

We have adopted a Preferred Shares Rights Agreement, commonly known as a "poison pill." The provisions described above, our poison pill and provisions of the California General Corporation Law may discourage, delay or prevent a third party from acquiring us.


Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments.

None


Item 2.
Properties.

The following table sets forth the significant real property that we own or lease as of February 23, 2007:
 
Location
  
Segment(s) served
  
Size in Sq. Feet
  
Commitment
 Sunnyvale, California
  
All
  
 160,000
  
Leased, expiring 2012
3 buildings
 Huber Heights (Dayton), Ohio
  
Engineering & Construction
Field Solutions
Distribution
  
150,000
57,200
35,600
  
Owned, no encumbrances
Leased, expiring in 2011
Leased, month to month
Westminster, Colorado
  
Engineering & Construction, Field Solutions
  
 76,000
  
Leased, expiring 2013
 Corvallis, Oregon
  
Engineering & Construction
  
 20,000
38,000
  
Owned, no encumbrances
Leased, expiring 2007
 Richmond Hill, Canada
  
Advanced Devices
  
 50,200
  
Leased, expiring 2007
 Danderyd, Sweden
  
Engineering & Construction
  
 93,900
  
Leased, expiring 2010
Christchurch, New Zealand
  
Engineering & Construction, Mobile Solutions, Field Solutions
  
 65,000
  
Leased, expiring 2010
2 buildings
Fremont, California (@Road)
  
Mobile Solutions
  
102,544
  
Leased, expiring 2010
2 buildings
Chennai, India
(@Road)
  
Mobile Solutions
  
37,910
  
Leased, expiring 2009

In addition, we lease a number of smaller offices around the world primarily for sales and manufacturing functions. For financial information regarding obligations under leases, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

* We believe that our facilities are adequate to support current and near-term operations.

Item 3.
Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation arising out of the ordinary course of its business. There are no known claims or pending litigation expected to have a material effect on our overall financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.


Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2006.
 
 
PART II

Item 5.
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol "TRMB." The table below sets forth, during the periods indicated, the high and low per share sale prices for our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ National Market.

   
2006
Sales Price
  
2005
Sales Price
  
Quarter Ended
  
High
  
Low
  
High
  
Low
  
First quarter
  
$
22.53
  
$
17.51
  
$
19.12
  
$
15.02
  
Second quarter
    
24.26
    
19.68
    
20.56
    
15.04
  
Third quarter
    
25.55
    
21.29
    
22.28
    
15.58
  
Fourth quarter
    
26.18
    
22.10
    
18.98
    
13.32
  

2-for-1 Stock Split

On January 17, 2007, Trimble’s Board of Directors approved a 2-for-1 split of all outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock, payable February 22, 2007 to stockholders of record on February 8, 2007. All shares and per share information presented has been adjusted to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis for all periods presented.

As of December 29, 2006, there were approximately 1,009 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividend Policy

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock during any period for which financial information is provided in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. At this time, we intend to retain future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Under the existing terms of our credit facility, we are allowed to pay dividends and repurchase shares of our common stock in any twelve (12) month period, in an aggregate amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of net income (plus to the extent deducted in determining net income for such period, non-cash expenses in respect of stock options) for the previous twelve month period.  Also, we are allowed to spend an additional $50 million to pay dividends and repurchase shares if we are in compliance with our fixed charge coverage ratio.


Item 6.
Selected Financial Data

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this annual report. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results. In particular, because the results of operations and financial condition related to our acquisitions are included in our Consolidated Statements of Income and Consolidated Balance Sheets data commencing on those respective acquisition dates, comparisons of our results of operations and financial condition for periods prior to and subsequent to those acquisitions are not indicative of future results.
 
As of And For the Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
January 2,
2004
  
January 3,
2003
  
(Dollar in thousands, except per share data)
                      
                       
Revenue
  
$
940,150
  
$
774,913
  
$
668,808
  
$
540,903
  
$
466,602
  
Gross margin
  
$
461,081
  
$
389,805
  
$
324,810
  
$
268,030
  
$
234,432
  
Gross margin percentage
    
49
%
  
50
%
  
49
%
  
50
%
  
50
%
Income from continuing operations
 
$
103,658
  
$
84,855
  
$
67,680
  
$
38,485
  
$
10,324
  
Net income
 
$
103,658
  
$
84,855
  
$
67,680
  
$
38,485
  
$
10,324
  
Per common share (1):
                               
Net income (1)
                                
- Basic
  
$
0.94
  
$
0.80
  
$
0.66
  
$
0.41
  
$
0.12
  
- Diluted
  
$
0.89
  
$
0.75
  
$
0.62
  
$
0.38
  
$
0.12
  
Shares used in calculating basic earnings per share (1)
    
110,044
    
106,432
    
102,326
    
95,010
    
85,720
  
Shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share (1)
    
116,072
    
113,638
    
109,896
    
100,024
    
87,156
  
Cash dividends per share
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
                                 
Total assets
  
$
978,431
  
$
743,088
  
$
653,978
  
$
552,602
  
$
447,704
  
Non-current portion of long term debt and other non-current liabilities
  
$
28,000
  
$
19,474
  
$
38,226
  
$
85,880
  
$
114,051
  

 
(1)
2-for-1 Stock Split - On January 17, 2007, Trimble’s Board of Directors approved a 2-for-1 split of all outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock, payable February 22, 2007 to stockholders of record on February 8, 2007. All shares and per share information presented has been adjusted to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis for all periods presented.

 
Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and those listed under "Risks Factors."

EXECUTIVE LEVEL OVERVIEW

Trimble’s focus is on combining positioning technology with wireless communication and application capabilities to create system-level solutions that enhance productivity and accuracy for our customers. The majority of our markets are end-user markets, including engineering and construction firms, governmental organizations, public safety workers, farmers and companies who must manage fleets of mobile workers and assets. In our Advanced Devices segment, we also provide components to original equipment manufacturers to incorporate into their products. In the end user markets, we provide a system that includes a hardware platform that may contain software and customer support. Some examples of our solutions include products that automate and simplify the process of surveying land, products that automate the utilization of equipment such as tractors and bulldozers, products that enable a company to manage its mobile workforce and assets, and products that allow municipalities to manage their fixed assets.

Solutions targeted at the end-user make up a significant majority of our revenue. To create compelling products, we must attain an understanding of the end users’ needs and work flow, and how location-based technology can enable that end user to work faster, more efficiently and more accurately. We use this knowledge to create highly innovative products that change the way work is done by the end-user. With the exception of our TMS segment, our products are generally sold through a dealer channel, and it is crucial that we maintain a proficient global, third-party distribution channel.

During 2006 we continued to execute our strategy with a series of actions that can be summarized in four categories.

Reinforcing our position in existing markets

Generally, we believe that our markets provide us with additional, substantial potential for substituting our technology for traditional methods. In 2006 we continued to develop new products and to strengthen our distribution channels to realize these opportunities. A number of new products such as Trimble S6, Trimble SPS700 Robotic Construction Total Station and the enhanced Trimble GCS900 Grade Control System strengthened our competitive position and created new value for the user.

Extend our position in existing markets through new product categories

We are utilizing the strength of the Trimble brand in our markets to expand our revenues by bringing new products to existing users. A 2006 example was the introduction of the AgGPS EZ-Boom 2010 product. In order to create new categories of products on the construction site we acquired Quantm, Meridian, XYZ Solutions, and Bitwyse.

Bring existing technology to new markets

* We continue to reinforce our position in existing markets and positioned ourselves in newer markets that will serve as important sources of future growth. Our efforts in China, India, Russia, Korea and Eastern Europe all reflected improving financial results, with the promise of more in the future.

Entered completely new markets

In fiscal 2006 we acquired Visual Statement, which provides desktop software tools for crime and collision incident investigation, analysis, and reconstitution as well as state-wide enterprise solutions for reporting and analysis used by public safety agencies, and Eleven Technology, Inc., which is a mobile application software company with a leading position in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry. In addition, we increased our reach with existing products in new markets, particularly emerging markets such as China and India.


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We consider the accounting polices described below to be our critical accounting polices. These critical accounting policies are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions, and estimates used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements, and actual results could differ materially from the amounts reported based on these policies.

Revenue Recognition

Our revenues are recorded in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” and in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition” and Statement of Position (SOP) No. 98-9, “Modification of SOP 97-2”. The Company recognizes product revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. In instances where final acceptance of the product is specified by the customer or is uncertain, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met.

Contracts and customer purchase orders are typically used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. We assess collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customer’s payment history.

Our shipment terms for US orders, and international orders fulfilled from its European distribution center are typically FCA (Free Carrier) shipping point, except certain sales to US government agencies which are shipped FOB destination. FCA shipping point means that we fulfill the obligation and title has passed to the buyer upon delivery of the goods to the carrier named by the buyer at the named place or point. If no precise point is indicated by the buyer, we may choose within the place or range stipulated where the carrier will take the goods into carrier’s charge. FOB destination means revenue for orders are not recognized until the product is delivered and title has transferred to the buyer. We bear all costs and risks of loss or damage to the goods up to that point. Shipping and handling costs are included in the cost of goods sold.

Revenue to distributors and resellers is recognized upon delivery, assuming all other criteria for revenue recognition have been met. Distributors and resellers do not have a right of return.

Revenues from purchased extended warranty and support agreements are deferred and recognized ratably over the term of the warranty/support period.

We apply Statement of Position (SOP) No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition” to products where the embedded software is more than incidental to the functionality of the hardware. This determination requires significant judgment including a consideration of factors such as marketing, research and development efforts and any postcustomer contract support relating to the embedded software.

In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,” when a non-software sale involves multiple elements the entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each respective element based on its relative fair value and recognized when revenue recognition criteria for each element are met.

Our software arrangements generally consist of a perpetual license fee and post contract customer support (PCS). We have established vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value for our PCS contracts based on the renewal rate. The remaining value of the software arrangement is allocated to the license fee using the residual method, which revenue is primarily recognized when the software has been delivered and there are no remaining obligations. Revenue from PCS is recognized ratably over the term of the PCS agreement.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Sales Returns

Our accounts receivable balance, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, was $172.0 million as of December 29, 2006, compared with $145.1 million as of December 30, 2005. We evaluate the collectibility of our trade accounts receivable based on a number of factors such as age of the accounts receivable balances, credit quality, historical experience, and current economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. In circumstances where we are aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us, a specific allowance for bad debts is estimated and recorded which reduces the recognized receivable to the estimated amount we believe will ultimately be collected. In addition to specific customer identification of potential bad debts, bad debt charges are recorded based on our recent past loss history and an overall assessment of past due trade accounts receivable amounts outstanding.


A reserve for sales returns is established based on historical trends in product return rates experienced in the ordinary course of business. The reserve for sales returns as of December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005 were $900,000 and $1.5 million, respectively, for estimated future returns that were recorded as a reduction of our accounts receivable and revenue. If the actual future returns were to deviate from the historical data on which the reserve had been established, our revenue could be adversely affected.

Inventory Valuation

Our inventories, net balance was $112.6 million as of December 29, 2006 compared with $107.9 million as of December 30, 2005. Our inventory allowances as of December 29, 2006 were $28.6 million, compared with $23.2 million as of December 30, 2005. Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with costs primarily computed on a standard cost basis. Adjustments to reduce the cost of inventory to its net realizable value, if required, are made for estimated excess, obsolescence, or impaired inventory. Factors influencing these adjustments include decline in demand, technological changes, product life cycle and development plans, component cost trends, product pricing, physical deterioration, and quality issues. If actual factors are less favorable than those projected by us, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

Income Taxes
 
Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method whereby deferred tax assets or liability account balances are calculated at the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not such assets will not be realized.

The company’s valuation allowance is attributable to, primarily, the California Research Credit and acquisition Net Operating Loss carryforwards.  Valuation allowance amounts are offsets to related deferred tax assets. Management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize these deferred tax assets and, accordingly, a valuation allowance has been established for such amounts. When the tax credits are utilized and the valuation allowance is released, the benefit of the release of the valuation allowance will be accounted for as a credit to shareholder’s equity rather than as a reduction of the income tax provision.
 
Annual Goodwill Impairment Test

Goodwill as of December 29, 2006 was $374.5 million, compared with $286.1 million as of December 30, 2005. The process of evaluating the potential impairment of goodwill is subjective and requires significant assumptions. If an evaluation is required, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with these assets would be compared to their carrying amount to determine if a write-down to fair market value or discounted cash flow value is required.

We performed an annual impairment test of goodwill at the end of the third fiscal quarter of 2006 and 2005 and found there was no impairment of goodwill. We will continue to evaluate our goodwill for impairment on an annual basis at the end of each fiscal third quarter and whenever events and changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The determination of the net carrying value of goodwill and the extent to which, if any, there is impairment are dependent on material estimates and judgments on our part, including the useful life over which the intangible assets are to be amortized, and the estimates of the value of future net cash flows, which are based upon further estimates of future revenues, expenses and operating income.

Accounting for Long-Lived Assets Including Intangibles Subject to Amortization

Depreciation and amortization of our long-lived assets is provided using straight-line methods over their estimated useful lives. Changes in circumstances such as technological advances, changes to our business model, or changes in the capital strategy could result in the actual useful lives differing from initial estimates. In those cases where we determine that the useful life of a long-lived asset should be revised, we will depreciate the net book value in excess of the estimated residual value over its revised remaining useful life. Factors such as changes in the planned use of equipment, customer attrition, contractual amendments, or mandated regulatory requirements could result in shortened useful lives.


Long-lived assets and asset groups are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about expected future operating performance and may differ from actual cash flows. Long-lived assets evaluated for impairment are grouped with other assets to the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value in the period in which the determination is made.

Warranty Costs

The liability for product warranties was $8.6 million as of December 29, 2006, compared with $7.5 million as of December 30, 2005. We accrue for warranty costs as part of cost of sales based on associated material product costs, technical support labor costs, and costs incurred by third parties performing work on our behalf. Our expected future cost is primarily estimated based upon historical trends in the volume of product returns within the warranty period and the cost to repair or replace the equipment. The products sold are generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from 90 days to three years, and in some instances up to 5.5 years.

While we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of our component suppliers, our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage, and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Should actual product failure rates, material usage, or service delivery costs differ from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty accrual and related costs may be required.

Stock Compensation

We apply Standard of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”) and related interpretations in accounting for our stock option plans and stock purchase plan for fiscal 2006. As a result, the Company’s financial statements for fiscal 2006 include stock-based compensation expenses that are not comparable to financial statements prior to fiscal 2006. Prior to fiscal 2006, we applied Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" (APB 25) and related interpretations in accounting for our stock option plans and stock purchase plan. Accordingly, we did not recognize compensation cost for stock options granted at a price equal to fair market value prior to fiscal 2006.

For options granted prior to October 1, 2005, the fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For stock options granted on or after October 1, 2005, the fair value of each award is estimated on the date of grant using a binomial valuation model. Similar to the Black-Scholes model, the binomial model takes into account variables such as volatility, dividend yield rate, and risk free interest rate. In addition, the binomial model incorporates actual option-pricing behavior. For these reasons, we believe that the binomial model provides a fair value that is more representative of actual experience and future expected experience than the value calculated using the Black-Scholes model.

Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements describes the plans we operate, and Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contains a summary of the effects to reported net income and earnings per share for fiscal 2006, and pro forma net income and earnings per share for fiscal 2005 and 2004 as if we had elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value of the options granted at grant date.


RECENT BUSINESS DEVELOPMENTS

@Road, Inc.

On February 16, 2007, we acquired @Road, Inc. of Fremont, California. @Road, Inc. is a global provider of solutions designed to automate the management of mobile resources and to optimize the service delivery process for customers across a variety of industries. @Road will be reported within our Mobile Solutions business segment. This acquisition was the largest in acquisition value in the company’s history. It significantly increases our presence in the mobile resource management, or MRM, market which Trimble believes is a large and fast growing market.


* With the addition of @Road, Trimble’s TMS segment will be better able to service larger customers, with a broader and more robust solution set.

INPHO GmbH

On February 13, 2007, we acquired INPHO GmbH of Stuttgart, Germany. INPHO is a leader in photogrammetry and digital surface modeling for aerial surveying, mapping and remote sensing applications. INPHO will be reported within Trimble’s Engineering and Construction segment.

Spacient Technologies, Inc.

On November 21, 2006, we acquired privately-held Spacient Technologies, Inc. of Long Beach, California. Spacient is a leading provider of enterprise field service management and mobile mapping solutions for municipalities and utilities. Spacient’s performance is reported under our Field Solutions business segment.

Meridian Project Systems, Inc.

On November 7, 2006, we acquired privately-held Meridian Project Systems, Inc. of Folsom, California. Meridian provides enterprise project management and lifecycle software for optimizing the plan, build and operate lifecycle for real estate, construction and other physical infrastructure projects. Meridian’s performance is reported under our Engineering and Construction business segment.

XYZ Solutions, Inc.

On October 27, 2006, we acquired privately-held XYZ Solutions, Inc., of Alpharetta, Georgia. XYZ Solutions provides real-time, interactive 3D intelligence software to manage the spatial aspects of a construction project. XYZ Solutions’ performance is reported under our Engineering and Construction business segment.

Visual Statement, Inc.

On October 11, 2006, we acquired privately-held Visual Statement, Inc. of Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada. Visual Statement provides desktop software tools for crime and collision incident investigation, analysis, and reconstitution as well as state-wide enterprise solutions for reporting and analysis used by public safety agencies. Visual Statement’s performance is reported under our Mobile Solutions business segment.

BitWyse Solutions, Inc.

On May 1, 2006, we acquired the assets of privately-held BitWyse Solutions, Inc. of Salem, Massachusetts. BitWyse is a provider of engineering and construction information management software. BitWyse’s performance is reported under our Engineering and Construction business segment.

Eleven Technology, Inc.

On April 28, 2006, we acquired privately-held Eleven Technology, Inc. of Cambridge, Massachusetts. Eleven is a mobile application software company with a leading position in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry. Eleven’s performance is reported under our Mobile Solutions business segment.

Quantm International, Inc.

On April 5, 2006, we acquired privately-held Quantm International, Inc., a provider of transportation route optimization solutions used for planning highways, railways, pipelines and canals. Quantm’s performance is reported under our Engineering and Construction business segment.

XYZs of GPS, Inc.

On February 26, 2006, we acquired the assets of XYZs of GPS, Inc. of Dickerson, Maryland. XYZ develops real-time Global Navigation Satellite System or, GNSS, reference station, integrity monitoring and dynamic positioning software for meter, decimeter and centimeter applications. XYZs’ performance is reported under our Engineering and Construction business segment.


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

The following table is a summary of revenue, gross margin and operating income for the periods indicated and should be read in conjunction with the narrative descriptions below.
 
Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(Dollars in thousands)
              
               
Total consolidated revenue
 
$
940,150
  
$
774,913
  
$
668,808
  
Gross Margin
  
$
461,081
  
$
389,805
  
$
324,810
  
Gross Margin %
    
49% (1)
    
50
%
  
49
%
Total consolidated operating income
 
$
135,365
  
$
124,944
  
$
85,625
  
Operating Income %
    
14% (1)
    
16
%
  
13
%

Basis of Presentation

We have a 52-53 week fiscal year, ending on the Friday nearest to December 31, which for fiscal 2006 was December 29, 2006. Fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004 were 52-week years.

Revenue

In fiscal 2006, total revenue increased by $165.3 million or 21% to $940.2 million from $774.9 million in fiscal 2005. The increase in fiscal 2006 was primarily due to stronger performances across all our operating segments. The Engineering and Construction, Field Solutions, Mobile Solutions and Advanced Devices segments increased 21%, 9%, 93%, and 13% respectively, compared to fiscal 2005. Revenue growth within these segments was driven by new product introductions, increased penetration of existing markets, and geographical expansion. Mobile Solutions growth in particular benefited from the prior year acquisitions. Overall, 2006 acquisitions impacted total company revenue growth by approximately 2%.

In fiscal 2005, total revenue increased by $106.1 million or 16% to $774.9 million from $668.8 million in fiscal 2004. The increase in fiscal 2005 was primarily due to stronger performances across all our operating segments with the exception of Component Technologies. The Engineering and Construction, Field Solutions and Mobile Solutions segments increased 19%, 21% and 34%, respectively, compared to fiscal 2004. Revenue growth within these segments was driven by new product introductions and increased penetration of existing markets. Both the Engineering and Construction and Mobile Solutions operating segments also benefited from the impact of the Pacific Crest, Apache and MobileTech acquisitions.

* During the 2006 fiscal year, sales to customers in the United States represented 54%, Europe represented 25%, Asia Pacific represented 12% and other regions represented 9% of our total revenues. During the 2005 fiscal year, sales to customers in the United States represented 54%, Europe represented 25%, Asia Pacific represented 11% and other regions represented 10% of our total revenues. We anticipate that sales to international customers will continue to account for a major portion of our revenues.

* No single customer accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004. It is possible, however, that in future periods the failure of one or more large customers to purchase products in quantities anticipated by us may adversely affect the results of operations.

Gross Margin

Our gross margin varies due to a number of factors including product mix, pricing, distribution channel used, effects of production volumes, new product start-up costs, and foreign currency translations. In fiscal 2006, our gross margin increased by $71.3 million as compared to fiscal 2005 due to higher revenue and the success of higher margin products, including survey and machine control products and higher subscription revenues. The increase was partially offset by decreases due to the impact of the reclassification of the CTCT transactions of $18.1 million previously recorded in non-operating expenses, amortization of software-related purchased intangibles of $5.2 million and stock-based compensation expense of $1.2 million that were not included in gross margin during the same period in fiscal 2005. Gross margin as a percentage of total revenues was 49% in fiscal 2006 and 50% in fiscal 2005. The 1% decrease in the gross margin percentage was driven by a decrease of 3% due to the CTCT impact, amortization of purchased intangibles and stock-based compensation, offset by an increase of 2% due to higher margin products and subscription revenues.


In fiscal 2005, our gross margin increased by $65.0 million due to due to higher revenue and success of our market segmentation strategy, higher service revenues, cost reductions, and introduction of higher margin products. Gross margin as a percentage of total revenues was 50 % in fiscal 2005 and 49% in fiscal 2004.

* Because of potential product mix changes within and among the industry markets, market pressures on unit selling prices, fluctuations in unit manufacturing costs, including increases in component prices and other factors, current level gross margins cannot be assured.


Operating Income

Operating income increased by $10.4 million for fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005 due to higher revenues and the success of higher margin products, offset by decreases due to the impact of the reclassification of the CTCT transactions previously recorded in non-operating expenses and stock-based compensation expense that was not included in operating income during the same period in fiscal 2005.
 
Operating income as a percentage of total revenue was 14% for fiscal 2006 compared to 16% in fiscal 2005. The 2% decrease in operating income was due to a 4% CTCT transaction reclassification impact, amortization of purchased intangibles, increased acquisition expenses, and stock-based compensation impact, partially offset by 2% increase driven by gross margin expansion.

Operating income increased by $39.3 million for fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004. Operating income as a percentage of total revenue was 16% as compared to 13% in fiscal 2004. The increase was due to improvement in revenues along with gross margins and greater leverage of operating expenses. Operating expenses represented 34% of total revenue in fiscal 2005 as compared to 36% in fiscal 2004.


Results by Segment

To achieve distribution, marketing, production, and technology advantages in our targeted markets, we manage our operations in the following four segments: Engineering and Construction, Field Solutions, Mobile Solutions, and Advanced Devices. Operating income (loss) equals net revenue less cost of sales and operating expenses, excluding general corporate expenses, amortization of purchased intangibles, in-process research and development expenses, restructuring charges, non-operating income (expense), and income taxes.

In the first fiscal quarter of 2006, we combined the operating results of the former Component Technologies and Portfolio Technologies segments and included the combined operating results in the Advanced Devices segment. The change in presentation was made in recognition of the small size of each of the businesses relative to the total company. The presentation of prior period’s segment operating results has been changed to conform to our current segment presentation.
 
 
The following table is a breakdown of revenue and operating income by segment for the periods indicated and should be read in conjunction with the narrative descriptions below.
 
Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(Dollars in thousands)
              
               
Engineering and Construction
              
Revenue
  
$
637,118
  
$
524,461
  
$
440,478
  
Segment revenue as a percent of total revenue
    
68
%
  
68
%
  
66
%
Operating income
  
$
136,157
  
$
117,993
  
$
79,505
  
Operating income as a percent of segment revenue
    
21
%
  
22
%
  
18
%
Field Solutions
                    
Revenue
  
$
139,230
  
$
127,843
  
$
105,591
  
Segment revenue as a percent of total revenue
    
15
%
  
16
%
  
16
%
Operating income
  
$
37,377
  
$
32,527
  
$
25,151
  
Operating income as a percent of segment revenue
    
27
%
  
25
%
  
24
%
Mobile Solutions
                    
Revenue
  
$
60,854
  
$
31,481
  
$
23,531
  
Revenue as a percent of total consolidated revenue
    
6
%
  
4
%
  
4
%
Operating income (loss)
  
$
2,550
  
$
(3,072
)
$
(5,997
)
Operating income (loss) as a percent of segment revenue
    
4
%
  
(10
%)
  
(25
%)
Advanced Devices
                    
Revenue
  
$
102,948
  
$
91,128
  
$
99,208
  
Segment revenue as a percent of total revenue
    
11
%
  
12
%
  
15
%
Operating income
  
$
10,084
  
$
13,212
  
$
18,746
  
Operating income as a percent of segment revenue
    
10
%
  
14
%
  
19
%
 
 
A reconciliation of our consolidated segment operating income to consolidated income before income taxes follows:

 
Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(In thousands)
              
               
Consolidated segment operating income
 
$
186,168
  
$
160,660
  
$
117,405
  
Unallocated corporate expense
    
(35,799
)
  
(27,483
)
  
(22,901
)
Restructuring charges
          
(278
)
  
(552
)
Amortization of purchased intangible assets
   
(13,074
)
  
(6,855
)
  
(8,327
)
In-process research and development
    
(1,930
)
  
(1,100
)
  
-
  
Non-operating income (expense), net
    
12,727
    
(156
)
  
(10,701
)
Consolidated income before income taxes
  
$
148,092
  
$
124,788
  
$
74,924
  

Engineering and Construction

Engineering and Construction revenues increased by $112.7 million or 21% while segment operating income increased by $18.2 million or 15% for fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. The revenue growth was driven by the continued strength in survey products as well as increased sales of machine control products, aggressive marketing programs and geographic expansion. Segment operating income increased as a result of higher revenues and increased sales of higher margin products, partially offset by $5.7 million in expenses related to CTCT transactions, $4.0 million in stock-based compensation expense that were not present in the corresponding period of fiscal 2005.

Engineering and Construction revenues increased by $84.0 million or 19% while segment operating income increased by $38.5 million or 48% for fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004. The revenue growth was driven by the introduction of products such as the Trimble S6 and machine control products, and growth of existing products such as the Trimble R8 GPS System. Revenue growth was also attributed to the acquisitions for fiscal 2005. Segment operating income increased as a result of higher revenues and increased sales of higher margin products.

Field Solutions

Field Solutions revenues increased by approximately $11.4 million or 9% while segment operating income increased by $4.9 million or 15% for fiscal year 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. Revenue increased primarily due growth in our GIS business. In GIS, growth was due to new products and a continuing shift to a higher value, differentiated distribution channel. The agricultural business remained stable as compared to the prior year due to a steady agricultural market. Operating income increased primarily due to strong operating leverage and increased revenue, partially offset by the inclusion of stock-based compensation that was not present in the corresponding periods of fiscal 2005.


Field Solutions revenues increased by approximately $22.3 million or 21% while segment operating income increased by $7.4 million or 29% for fiscal year 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004. Revenue increased primarily due to successful new products such as the AgGPS EZ-Guide system and AgGPS EZ-Steer system in our agriculture product line and as a result of higher demand for both automated and manual guidance products into the agricultural market. Operating income increased primarily due to increased revenue and associated gross margins.


Mobile Solutions

Mobile Solutions revenues increased by $29.4 million or 93% while segment operating income increased by $5.6 million or 183% for fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. Revenue increased due to increased subscriber growth, an increase in recurring subscription revenues, the benefit of acquisitions, especially MobileTech, and entry into new vertical markets. Operating income increased primarily due to higher subscription revenue and associated gross margins, partially offset by the inclusion of stock-based compensation that was not present in fiscal 2005.

Mobile Solutions revenues increased by $8.0 million or 34% in fiscal 2005 over fiscal 2004 due to increased subscriber growth, an increase in sales into the ready-mix suppliers, and increased sales from our dealer channel as we continue to develop and extend this channel. Operating loss decreased by $2.9 million or 49% in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004 primarily attributable to an increase in revenues and increase in gross margins due higher recurring service revenue.


Advanced Devices

Advanced Devices revenues increased by $11.8 million or 13% while segment operating income decreased by $3.1 million or 24% for fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. The increase in revenue was primarily due to stronger performance in our embedded and airborne products as well as licensing revenues associated with a Nokia intellectual property agreement signed in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. Operating income decreased for fiscal 2006 due to sales of lower gross margin products, a reduction in revenue in our Military and Advanced Systems product line, increased costs related to the TrimTrac product line and inclusion of stock-based compensation that were not present in the corresponding periods of fiscal 2005, partially offset by stronger embedded and airborne product revenue and intellectual property licensing revenue.

Advanced Devices revenues decreased by $8.1 million or 8% while segment operating income decreased by $5.5 million or 30% for fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004. The decrease in revenue and operating income were primarily due to the decline in demand for our in-vehicle navigation products as a result of changes in buying strategies among certain automotive manufacturers, and softness in the timing business, which was offset by a stronger performance in our Applanix airborne business.


Research and Development, Sales and Marketing, and General and Administrative Expenses

The following table shows research and development (“R&D”), sales and marketing, and general and administrative (“G&A”) expenses in absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenues for the fiscal years ended 2006, 2005 and 2004 and should be read in conjunction with the narrative descriptions of those operating expenses below.

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(In thousands)
        
 
      
 
        
Research and development
  
$
103,840
    
11
%
$
84,276
    
11
%
$
77,558
    
11
%
Sales and marketing
    
143,623
    
15
%
  
120,215
   
15
%
  
108,054
   
16
%
General and administrative
    
68,416
    
7
%
  
52,137
   
7
%
  
44,694
   
7
%
     
315,879
    
34
%
$
256,628
    
33
%
$
230,306
    
34
%

Overall, R&D, sales and marketing, and G&A expenses increased by approximately $59.3 million in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005.

Research and development expenses increased by $19.6 million in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 primarily due to the inclusion of expenses of $4.6 million from acquisitions not applicable in the prior year, $4.9 million increase in compensation related expenses, $2.6 million in stock-based compensation expense not present in fiscal 2005 and $2.3 million increase in R&D materials, primarily due to compliance with the European lead free initiative. All of our R&D costs have been expensed as incurred. Cost of software developed for external sale subsequent to reaching technical feasibility were not considered material and were expensed as incurred.


Research and development expenses increased by $6.7 million in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004 primarily due to the inclusion of expenses from acquisitions not applicable in the prior year in the amount of $2.8 million and increase in compensation of $2.8 million.

* Overall research and development spending remained relatively constant at approximately 11% of revenues. We expect to continue to devote resources to the development of new products and the enhancement of existing products. We believe that research and development is critical to our strategic product development objectives and that to leverage our leading technology and meet the changing requirements of our customers, we will need to fund investments in several development projects in parallel.

Sales and marketing expenses increased by $23.4 million in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005. The increase was primarily due the inclusion of expenses from acquisitions not applicable in the prior period in the amount of $7.5 million, $8.0 million increase in compensation related expenses, $2.8 million in stock-based compensation expense not present in the third quarter of fiscal 2005, and $1.9 million in customer trade show expenses due to increased size and attendance at the shows. Spending overall remained relatively constant at approximately 15% of revenues.

Sales and marketing expenses increased by $12.2 million in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004, but decreased as a percent of total revenues. The increase was primarily due to advertising and promotion costs associated with the launch of new products of $5.4 million, the inclusion of expenses from acquisitions not applicable in the prior year of $1.5 million, increase in travel expenses of $1.4 million, and an increase in compensation of $1.7 million.

* We intend to continue to focus and expand our sales and marketing efforts across all the geographies and markets we serve in order to increase market awareness of our products and to better support our existing customers worldwide. Our future growth will depend in part on the timely development and continued viability of the markets in which we currently compete as well as our ability to continue to identify and exploit new markets for our products.

General and administrative expenses increased by $16.3 million in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 primarily due to the inclusion of expenses from acquisitions not applicable in the prior year of $4.3 million, $3.9 million increase in compensation-related expenses, and $6.0 million in stock-based compensation expense not present in fiscal 2005. Spending overall remained relatively constant at approximately 7% of revenues.

General and administrative expenses increased by $7.4 million in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004 primarily due to an increase in compensation expense of $5.9 million, increase in rent expense of $1.0 million as we were making duplicate payments during our move to our new headquarters, the inclusion of expenses from acquisitions not applicable in the prior year of $1.8 million, and increase of $0.8 million in patent expense. This was partially offset by a decrease in bad debt expense of $1.7 million. 


Other Operating Expenses

Restructuring Charges

There were no restructuring charges recorded in fiscal 2006. Restructuring charges of $0.3 million, and $0.6 million were recorded in fiscal years 2005 and 2004 respectively. The charges in fiscal 2005 were primarily related to office closure costs due to integration efforts of the Mensi acquisition. The charges in fiscal 2004 were primarily related to severance costs due to the realignment of Trimble Mobile Solutions Inc. As a result of the realignment, the headcount decreased by 36 in fiscal 2004. As of December 29, 2006, an accrual balance of $0.1 million, related to the fiscal 2005 office closure, is expected to be paid over the next several years.

In-Process Research and Development
 
We recorded in-process research and development (IPR&D) expense of $1.9 million and $1.1 million related to acquisitions made in fiscal 2006 and 2005 respectively. We did not record any IPR&D expense in fiscal 2004. At the date of each acquisition, the projects associated with the IPR&D efforts had not yet reached technological feasibility and the research and development in process had no alternative future uses. The value of the IPR&D was determined using a discounted cash flow model similar to the income approach, focusing on the income producing capabilities of the in-process technologies. Accordingly, the value assigned to these IPR&D amounts were charged to expense on the respective acquisition date of each of the acquired companies.
 

Amortization of Purchased and Other Intangible Assets

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(in thousands)
              
Amortization of purchased intangibles included in cost of sales
  
$
5,168
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
Amortization of purchased intangibles included in operating expenses
    
7,906
  
$
6,855
  
$
8,327
  
Amortization of other intangible assets
    
185
    
165
    
183
  
Total amortization of purchased and other intangible assets
 
$
13,259
  
$
7,020
  
$
8,510
  

Total amortization expense of purchased and other intangible assets was $13.3 million in fiscal 2006, of which $5.4 million was recorded in cost of sales and $7.9 million was recorded in operating expenses. Total amortization expense of purchased and other intangibles represented 1.4% of revenue in fiscal 2006, an increase of $6.2 million from fiscal 2005 when it represented 0.9% of revenue. The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of certain technology and patent intangibles as a result of acquisitions made in fiscal 2006 as well as fiscal 2005 acquisition intangibles that included a full year of amortization expense in fiscal 2006, but only partial year amortization expense in fiscal 2005 due to the timing of the acquisitions.

Amortization expense of purchased and other intangibles represented 0.9% of revenue in fiscal 2005, a decrease of $1.5 million from fiscal 2004 when it represented 1.3% of revenue. Although there were acquisitions in fiscal 2005, amortization expense decreased due to the fact our Spectra Precision Group intangibles were fully amortized in the second quarter of fiscal 2005.

Non-operating Expense, Net

The following table shows non-operating expense, net for the periods indicated and should be read in conjunction with the narrative descriptions of those expenses below:

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(in thousands)
              
               
Interest income
  
$
3,799
  
$
836
  
$
436
  
Interest expense
    
(558
)
  
(2,331
)
  
(3,888
)
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
    
1,719
    
1,022
    
(859
)
Income (expenses) for affiliated operations, net
    
6,989
    
(291
)
  
(7,590
)
Other income
   
777
    
608
   
1,200
 
Total non-operating income (expense), net
  
$
12,726
  
$
(156
)
$
(10,701
)

Non-operating income, net increased by $12.9 million during fiscal 2006 compared with fiscal 2005. Of this increase, $4.7M was due to higher interest income and lower interest expense as a result of interest income earned on higher cash balances and debt repaid in fiscal 2005 and also a $0.7 million increase in foreign currency transaction gains. In addition, expenses for affiliated operations, net increased by $7.3 million due a $5.2 million increase in income from affiliated operations and the absence of $11.6 million of net transfer pricing expense with CTCT that was included in fiscal 2005, but is now included in operating income, partially offset by the recognition of a one-time deferred gain on the CTCT joint venture of $9.3 million in fiscal 2005.

Non-operating expense, net decreased by $10.5 million during fiscal 2005 as compared with fiscal 2004 primarily due to a decrease in net interest expense of $2.0 million as a result of the repayment of debt and interest earned on higher cash balances offset by a $0.9 million write-off of debt issuance costs relating to the 2003 Credit Facility, an increase of $1.9 million in foreign currency transaction gain and a $7.3 million decrease in expenses for affiliated operations as a result of increased profits from our joint ventures and recognition of the remaining deferred gain from the Caterpillar joint venture. This was partially offset by a decrease in other income primarily due to the absence of a non-recurring gain in investments of approximately $1.0 million in fiscal year 2004.


Income Tax Provision

Our effective income tax rate for fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004 was 30%, 32% and 10% respectively. The 2006 rate was less that the US federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to operations in foreign jurisdictions subject to an effective tax rate lower than the US and Extraterritorial Income Exclusion (ETI) deduction. The 2005 income tax rate was less that the US federal statutory rate, primarily due to the benefit from the repatriation of undistributed foreign subsidiary earnings provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The 2004 income tax rate was less than the federal statutory rate primarily due to the realization of benefits from net operating losses and other previously reserved deferred tax assets.


Litigation Matters

* From time to time, we are involved in litigation arising out of the ordinary course of our business. There are no known claims or pending litigation that are expected to have a material effect on our overall financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.


OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
 
Other than lease commitments incurred in the normal course of business (see Contractual Obligation table below), we do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or liabilities, guarantee contracts, retained or contingent interests in transferred assets, or any obligation arising out of a material variable interest in an unconsolidated entity. We do not have any majority-owned subsidiaries that are not included in the consolidated financial statements. Additionally, we do not have any interest in, or relationship with, any special purpose entities.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 
As of and for the Fiscal Year Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(dollars in thousands)
              
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  
$
129,621
  
$
73,853
  
$
71,872
  
As a percentage of total assets
    
13.2
%
  
9.9
%
  
11.0
%
Accounts receivable days sales outstanding (DSO)
    
55
    
66
    
63
  
Inventory turns per year
    
4
    
4
    
4
  
Total debt
  
$
481
  
$
649
  
$
38,996
  
                     
Cash provided by operating activities
  
$
138,087
  
$
92,880
  
$
74,576
  
Cash used in investing activities
  
$
(116,432
)
$
(74,918
)
$
(25,133
)
Cash provided (used) by financing activities
  
$
34,162
  
$
(13,402
)
$
(24,159
)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
  
$
55,768
  
$
1,981
  
$
26,456
  

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Our financial condition further strengthened as cash and cash equivalents totaled $129.6 million at December 29, 2006, compared to $73.9 million at December 30, 2005. We essentially had no debt at December 29, 2006 and December 20, 2005.

In fiscal 2006, cash provided by operating activities was $138.1 million, compared to $92.9 million in cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2005. This increase of $45.2 million was primarily driven by a $22.8 million increase in net income before stock-based compensation expense and associated excess tax benefits, with the remainder due to working capital improvements in inventories and account receivables.

Our accounts receivable days of sales outstanding improved to 55 days at the end of fiscal 2006, from 66 days at the end of fiscal 2005. The decrease is primarily due to increased collection efforts and improvement in monitoring of outstanding receivables. In addition, in the first quarter of 2006, the Company established a dealer floor plan financing program in the U.S. and Canada through a non-recourse financing facility. Our accounts receivable days of sales outstanding is based upon the latest month revenues plus any uncollected accounts receivable from prior months’ revenues calculated into days. Our inventory turns were at 4.1 for fiscal 2006 as compared to 3.9 for fiscal 2005. Our inventory turnover is based on the total cost of sales for the fiscal period over the average inventory for the corresponding fiscal period.


In fiscal 2005, cash provided by operating activities was $92.9 million, as compared to $74.6 million in fiscal 2004. The increase of $18.3 million was primarily driven by the $17.2 million increase in net income during fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004. Our ability to continue to generate cash from operations will depend in large part on profitability, the rate of collections of accounts receivable, our inventory turns, and our ability to manage other areas of working capital. Our accounts receivable days for sales outstanding increased from 63 days at the end of fiscal 2004 to 66 days at the end of fiscal 2005. The increase is due to acquisitions, delayed payments from some government contracts, and past due accounts from a couple of key customers. Our inventory turns was unchanged at 4.0 at the end of fiscal 2005 and 2004.

Cash used in investing activities was $116.4 million in fiscal 2006, compared to $74.9 million in fiscal 2005. The $41.5 million increase in spending was due to an increase of $48.5 million in cash used for acquisitions, partially offset by a decrease of $6.9 million in capital equipment spending.

Cash used in investing activities was $74.9 million in fiscal 2005 as compared to $25.1 million in fiscal 2004. The $49.8 million increase was primarily due to an increase of $40.0 million in cash used for acquisitions and an increase of $10.6 million in investment in capital equipment of which $6.6 million was related to the relocation of our Sunnyvale headquarters.

Cash provided from financing activities was $34.2 million for fiscal 2006 compared to cash used of $13.4 million in fiscal 2005. The $47.6 million improvement was primarily due to a $38.3 million decrease in repayment of net debt, $8.8 million in excess tax benefits relating to stock-based compensation upon the exercise of stock options which were not present in fiscal 2005 and a $2.1 million increase in proceeds received from issuance of common stock.

Cash used in financing activities was $13.4 million in fiscal 2005 as compared to $24.2 million in fiscal 2004. The $10.8 million decrease was primarily due to a $12.9 million decrease in repayment of net debt as we repaid our entire debt balance in the second fiscal quarter of 2005. This was partially offset by a $2.3 million decrease in proceeds received from issuance of common stock and warrants.

* We believe that our cash and cash equivalents, together with our credit facilities ($200 million as of December 29, 2006), will be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating cash needs for at least the next twelve months.

* We anticipate that planned capital expenditures primarily for computer equipment, software, manufacturing tools and test equipment, and leasehold improvements associated with business expansion, will constitute a partial use of our cash resources. Decisions related to how much cash is used for investing are influenced by the expected amount of cash to be provided by operations.

* Additionally, on February 16, 2007, we acquired @Road which was funded through cash of Trimble and a new debt financing arrangement.  Post acquisition expenditures will be funded through anticipated positive cash flow from operations.  The positive cash flow from operations is a result of our belief that we will be able to manage our assets efficiently and achieve our overall financial projections.

Debt

At the end of fiscal 2006, our total debt was comprised of government loans to foreign subsidiaries in amount of approximately $481,000 as compared with approximately $649,000 at the end of fiscal 2005.

On July 28, 2005, we entered into a $200 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (“2005 Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of 10 banks with The Bank of Nova Scotia as the administrative agent. The 2005 Credit Facility replaces our $175 million secured 2003 Credit Facility. The funds available under the new 2005 Credit Facility may be used for our general corporate purposes and up to $25 million of the 2005 Credit Facility may be used for letters of credit. We incur a commitment fee if the 2005 Credit Facility is not used. The commitment fee is not material to our results during all periods presented. At December 29, 2006 and as of the date of this report, the Company has a zero balance outstanding and was in compliance with all financial debt covenants. For additional discussion of our debt, see Note 9 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
 
On February 16, 2007, the Company amended and restated its existing $200 million unsecured revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of 11 banks with The Bank of Nova Scotia as the administrative agent (the “2007 Credit Facility”). Under the 2007 Credit Facility, the Company exercised the accordion option in the existing credit agreement to increase the availability under the revolving credit line by $100,000,000, for an aggregate availability of up to $300,000,000, and extended the maturity date of the revolving credit line by 18 months, from July 2010 to February 2012.  Up to $25 million of the availability under the revolving credit line may be used to issue letters of credit, and up to $20 million may be used for swing line loans. In addition, the Company incurred five-year term loan under the 2007 Credit Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $100,000,000, which will mature concurrently with the revolving credit line.  The term loan will be repaid in quarterly installments, with principal being amortized at the following annual rates: year 1 at 10%, year 2 at 15%, year 3 at 15%, year 4 at 20%, year 5 at 20%, and the last quarterly payment to be made at maturity, together with a final payment of 20%.  Under the existing facility, the Company was required to maintain a maximum leverage ratio of 2:75:1. The 2007 Credit Facility increased the maximum leverage ratio to 3.00:1.   The funds available under the new 2007 Credit Facility may be used by the Company for acquisitions and general corporate purposes.
 
As of February 20, 2007, the Company had $150 million drawn on the revolving credit line and $100 million in term loan outstanding. 


CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 29, 2006:
 
   
Payments Due By Period
  
   
Total
  
Less than
1 year
  
2-3
Years
  
4-5
years
  
More than
5 years
  
(in thousands)
                     
                       
Total debt including interest (1)
  
$
481
  
$
-
  
$
481
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
Operating leases
   
41,857
    
10,852
    
17,505
    
9,944
    
3,556
  
Other purchase obligations and commitments
    
32,129
    
32,129
    
-
    
-
    
-
  
Total
 
$
74,467
  
$
42,981
  
$
17,986
  
$
9,944
  
$
3,556
  

(1) Excludes the impact of debt resulting from the @Road acquisition. See Note 18 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further financial information.

Total debt consists of government loans to foreign subsidiaries. (See Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further financial information regarding long-term debt)

Other purchase obligations and commitments represent open non-cancelable purchase orders for material purchases with our vendors and a forecasted commitment with a supplier for outsourced services as described in Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Our pension obligation which is not included in the table above, and is included in “Accrued compensation and benefits” and “Other non-current liabilities” on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, is disclosed at Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


EFFECT OF NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS 

The impact of recent accounting pronouncements is disclosed in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We use certain derivative financial instruments to manage these risks. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. All financial instruments are used in accordance with policies approved by our board of directors.

Market Interest Rate Risk

Our cash equivalents and short-term investments consisted primarily of money market funds and certificate of deposits for fiscal 2006 and 2005. The main objective of these investments was safety of principal and liquidity while maximizing return, without significantly increasing risk.

* Due to the short-term nature of our cash equivalents and short-term investments, we do not anticipate any material effect on our portfolio due to fluctuations in interest rates.
.
We may be exposed to market risk in the event we borrow against our 2005 Credit Facility. Borrowings under the 2005 Credit Facility have interest payments based on a floating rate of LIBOR plus a number of basis points tied to a formula based on our Leverage Ratio. The 2005 Credit Facility had outstanding principal balances of zero as of December 29, 2006.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to minimize the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations on certain trade and inter-company receivables and payables, primarily denominated in Australian, Canadian, Japanese, New Zealand, South African and Swedish currencies, the Euro, and the British pound. These contracts reduce the exposure to fluctuations in exchange rate movements as the gains and losses associated with foreign currency balances are generally offset with the gains and losses on the forward contracts. These instruments are marked to market through earnings every period and generally range from one to three months in original maturity. We do not enter into foreign exchange forward contract for trading purposes.

Foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding as of December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
   
December 29, 2006
  
December 30, 2005
  
   
Nominal Amount
  
Fair Value
  
Nominal Amount
  
Fair Value
  
Forward contracts:
                  
Purchased
  
$
(21,442
)
$
201
  
$
(14,426
)
$
249
  
Sold
  
$
38,579
  
$
(358
)
$
27,726
  
$
328
  

* We do not anticipate any material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position utilizing our current hedging strategy.
 

TRIMBLE NAVIGATION LIMITED
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005
42
   
Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 29, 2006
43
   
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 29, 2006
44
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 29, 2006
45
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
46
   
Reports of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
74


Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As at
  
December 29,
 2006
  
December 30,
 2005
  
(in thousands)
           
            
ASSETS
           
Current assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  
$
129,621
  
$
73,853
 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,063 and $5,230, and sales return reserve of $859 and $1,500, respectively
    
172,008
    
145,100
  
Other receivables
    
6,014
    
6,489
  
Inventories, net
    
112,552
    
107,851
  
Deferred income taxes
    
25,905
    
18,504
  
Other current assets
    
13,026
    
8,580
  
Total current assets
    
459,126
    
360,377
  
Property and equipment, net
    
47,998
    
42,664
  
Goodwill
    
374,510
    
286,146
  
Other purchased intangible assets, net
    
67,172
    
27,310
  
Deferred income taxes
    
399
    
3,580
  
Other assets
    
29,226
    
23,011
  
Total non-current assets
    
519,305
    
382,711
  
Total assets
  
$
978,431
  
$
743,088
  
               
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
              
Current liabilities:
              
Current portion of long-term debt
  
$
--
  
$
216
  
Accounts payable
    
44,148
    
45,206
  
Accrued compensation and benefits
    
47,006
    
36,083
  
Accrued liabilities
    
24,973
    
16,189
  
Deferred revenues
    
28,060
    
12,588
  
Accrued warranty expense
    
8,607
    
7,466
  
Deferred income taxes
    
4,525
    
4,087
  
Income taxes payable
    
23,814
    
24,922
  
Total current liabilities
    
181,133
    
146,757
  
Non-current portion of long-term debt
    
481
    
433
  
Deferred income tax
    
21,633
    
5,602
  
Other non-current liabilities
    
27,519
    
19,041
  
Total liabilities
    
230,766
    
171,833
  
Commitments and contingencies
              
Shareholders' equity:
              
Preferred stock no par value; 3,000 shares authorized; none outstanding
    
--
    
--
  
Common stock, no par value; 180,000 shares authorized; 111,718 and 107,820 shares issued and outstanding at December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, respectively
    
435,371
    
384,196
  
Retained earnings
    
271,183
    
167,525
  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    
41,111
    
19,534
  
Total shareholders' equity
    
747,665
    
571,255
  
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
  
$
978,431
  
$
743,088
  
 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
                 
                  
Revenue (1)
  
$
940,150
  
$
774,913
  
$
668,808
  
Cost of sales (1)
    
479,069
    
385,108
    
343,998
  
Gross margin
    
461,081
    
389,805
    
324,810
  
                     
Operating expenses
                    
Research and development
    
103,840
    
84,276
    
77,558
  
Sales and marketing
    
143,623
    
120,215
    
108,054
  
General and administrative
    
68,416
    
52,137
    
44,694
  
Restructuring charges
    
--
    
278
    
552
  
Amortization of purchased intangible assets
    
7,906
    
6,855
    
8,327
  
In-process research and development
    
1,930
    
1,100
    
-
  
Total operating expenses
    
325,715
    
264,861
    
239,185
  
Operating income
    
135,366
    
124,944
    
85,625
  
Non-operating income (expense), net
                    
Interest income
    
3,799
    
836
    
436
  
Interest expense
    
(558
)
  
(2,331
)
  
(3,888
)
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss), net
    
1,719
    
1,022
    
(859
)
Income (expenses) for affiliated operations, net
    
6,989
    
(291
)
  
(7,590
)
Other income
    
777
    
608
   
1,200
 
Total non-operating income (expense), net
    
12,726
    
(156
)
  
(10,701
)
Income before taxes
    
148,092
    
124,788
    
74,924
  
Income tax provision
    
44,434
    
39,933
    
7,244
  
Net income
  
$
103,658
  
$
84,855
  
$
67,680
  
                     
Basic earnings per share
  
$
0.94
  
$
0.80
  
$
0.66
  
Shares used in calculating basic earnings per share
    
110,044
    
106,432
    
102,326
  
                     
Diluted earnings per share
  
$
0.89
  
$
0.75
  
$
0.62
  
Shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share
    
116,072
    
113,638
    
109,896
  

(1) Sales to related parties were $22.3 million, $9.1 million and $7.6 million in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, while cost of sales to those related parties were $13.9 million, $4.0 million and $3.8 million in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. See Note 5 to these Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of related parties.
 
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
               
Accumulative
      
           
Other
  
Total
  
   
Common stock
  
Retained
  
Comprehensive
  
Shareholders'
  
   
Shares
  
Amount
  
Earnings
  
Income/(Loss)
  
Equity
  
(in thousands)
                      
                       
Balance at January 2, 2004
    
99,976
  
$
303,015
  
$
14,990
  
$
30,239
  
$
348,244
  
Components of comprehensive income:
                                
Net income
                
67,680
          
67,680
  
Gain on interest rate swap
                      
106
    
106
  
Unrealized loss on investments
                      
(6
)
  
(6
)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
                      
14,025
    
14,025
  
Total comprehensive income
                            
81,805
  
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisitions and joint venture, net
    
589
    
899
                
899
  
Issuance of common stock under employee plans and exercise of warrants
    
3,861
    
26,805
                
26,805
  
Tax benefit from stock option exercises
          
14,408
                
14,408
  
Balance at December 31, 2004
    
104,426
    
345,127
    
82,670
    
44,364
    
472,161
  
Components of comprehensive income:
                                
Net income
                
84,855
          
84,855
  
Loss on interest rate swap
                      
(106
)
  
(106
)
Unrealized loss on investments
                      
(34
)
  
(34
)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
                      
(24,690
)
  
(24,690
)
Total comprehensive income
                            
60,025
  
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisitions, net
    
20
                      
-
  
Issuance of common stock under employee plans and exercise of warrants
    
3,374
    
24,582
                
24,582
  
Tax benefit from stock option exercises
          
14,487
                
14,487
  
Balance at December 30, 2005
    
107,820
    
384,196
    
167,525
    
19,534
    
571,255
  
Components of comprehensive income:
                                
Net income
                
103,658
          
103,658
  
Unrealized gain on investments
                      
3
    
3
  
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
                      
21,709
    
21,709
  
Adjustment to initially apply FASB Statement No. 158, net of tax
                      
(136
)
  
(136
)
Total comprehensive income
                            
125,234
  
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisitions, net
    
52
                          
Issuance of common stock under employee plans and exercise of warrants
    
3,846
    
26,781
                
26,781
  
Stock based compensation
          
12,705
                
12,706
  
Tax benefit from stock option exercises
            
11,689
                    
11,689
  
Balance at December 29, 2006
    
111,718
  
$
435,371
  
$
271,183
  
$
41,110
  
$
747,665
  
 
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(In thousands)
                
                 
Cash flows from operating activities:
                
Net income
  
$
103,658
  
$
84,855
  
$
67,680
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
                    
Depreciation
    
13,523
    
10,671
    
8,874
 
Amortization
    
13,259
    
7,020
    
8,510
 
Provision for doubtful accounts
    
163
    
(502
)
  
1,210
 
Amortization of debt issuance cost
    
180
    
1,270
    
487
 
Deferred income taxes
    
10,368
    
14,242
    
(1,482
)
Stock-based compensation
    
12,571
    
-
    
-
  
In-process research and development
    
1,930
    
1,100
    
-
  
Equity (gain) loss from joint ventures
    
(6,989
)
  
290
    
(1,212
)
Excess tax benefit for stock-based compensation
    
(8,761
)
  
-
    
-
  
Other
    
720
    
(756
)
  
1,191
  
Add decrease (increase) in assets:
                    
Accounts receivable, net
    
(12,185
)
  
(19,018
)
  
(17,245
)
Other receivables
    
1,949
    
(2,108
)
  
2,231
  
Inventories, net
    
(374
)
  
(17,888
)
  
(15,529
)
Other current and non-current assets
    
(18,692
)
  
(2,294
)
  
(69
)
Add increase (decrease) in liabilities:
                    
Accounts payable
    
(4,487
)
  
1,078
    
14,668
 
Accrued compensation and benefits
    
7,807
    
3,408
    
4,847
 
Accrued liabilities
    
9,952
    
6,232
    
(1,757
)
Deferred gain on joint venture
    
-
    
(9,180
)
  
(665
)
Deferred revenues
    
3,263
    
2,406
    
1,619
  
Income taxes payable
    
10,232
    
12,054
    
1,218
  
Net cash provided by operating activities
    
138,087
    
92,880
    
74,576
 
                     
Cash flows from investing activities:
                    
Acquisition of property and equipment
    
(16,529
)
  
(23,436
)
  
(12,750
)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
    
(99,887
)
  
(51,379
)
  
(11,388
)
Other
    
(16
)
  
(103
)
  
(995
)
Net cash used in investing activities
    
(116,432
)
  
(74,918
)
  
(25,133
)
                     
Cash flows from financing activities:
                    
Issuance of common stock and warrants
    
26,566
    
24,463
    
26,805
 
Excess tax benefit for stock-based compensation
    
8,761
    
-
    
-
  
Proceeds from long-term debt and revolving credit lines
    
-
    
6,000
    
14,000
  
Payments on long-term debt and revolving credit lines
    
-
    
(44,250
)
  
(65,235
)
Other
    
(1,165
)
  
385
    
271
  
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    
34,162
    
(13,402
)
  
(24,159
)
                     
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
    
(49
)
  
(2,579
)
  
1,172
  
                     
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    
55,768
    
1,981
    
26,456
 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of fiscal year
    
73,853
    
71,872
    
45,416
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of fiscal year
  
$
129,621
  
$
73,853
  
$
71,872
 

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1: DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Trimble Navigation Limited (Trimble or the Company) began operations in 1978 and incorporated in California in 1981. Trimble provides positioning product solutions, most typically to commercial and government users. The principal applications served include surveying, construction, agriculture, urban and resource management, military, transportation and telecommunications. The Company’s products typically provide its customers benefits that can include lower costs, and higher productivity. Examples of products include systems that guide agricultural and construction equipment, surveying instruments, systems that track fleets of vehicles, and data collection systems that enable the management of large amounts of geo referenced information. In addition, the Company also manufactures components for in vehicle navigation and telematics systems, and timing modules used in the synchronization of wireless networks.

NOTE 2: ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates 

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are used for allowances for doubtful accounts, sales returns reserve, allowances for inventory valuation, warranty costs, investments, goodwill impairments, and income taxes among others. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions believed to be reasonable. Although these estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions that may impact the company in the future, actual results may differ materially from management’s estimates.

Basis of Presentation

Trimble has a 52-53 week fiscal year, ending on the Friday nearest to December 31. Fiscal 2006, a 52-week year, ended on December 29, 2006, fiscal 2005, a 52-week year, and fiscal 2004, a 52-week year, ended on December 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Unless otherwise stated, all dates refer to its fiscal year.

These Consolidated Financial Statements include the results of Trimble and its subsidiaries. Inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain segment disclosures from prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

On January 17, 2007, Trimble’s Board of Directors approved a 2-for-1 split of all outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock, payable February 22, 2007 to stockholders of record on February 8, 2007. All shares and per share information presented has been adjusted to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis for all periods presented.
 
Foreign Currency Translation 

Assets and liabilities of non-U.S. subsidiaries that operate in local currencies are translated to U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, with the resulting translation adjustments directly recorded to a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Income and expense accounts are translated at average exchange rates during the year. Where the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, translation adjustments are recorded in foreign currency transaction adjustments, net of tax in accumulated other comprehensive income within the shareholders’ equity section of the consolidated balance sheets.

Cash and Cash Equivalents 

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and highly liquid investments with insignificant interest rate risk and maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.


Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, and other accrued liabilities approximate cost because of their short maturities. The fair value of investments is determined using quoted market prices for those securities or similar financial instruments.
 
Concentration of Risk

Cash and cash equivalents are maintained with several financial institutions. Deposits held with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and are maintained with financial institutions of reputable credit and therefore bear minimal credit risk.

The Company is also exposed to credit risk in the Company’s trade receivables, which are derived from sales to end user customers in diversified industries as well as various resellers. Trimble performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and limits the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary but generally does not require collateral.

With the selection of Solectron Corporation in August 1999 as an exclusive manufacturing partner for many of its GPS products, Trimble became substantially dependent upon a sole supplier for the manufacture of many of its products. In addition, the Company relies on sole suppliers for a number of its critical components.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Trimble maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments.

Trimble evaluates the collectibility of its trade accounts receivable based on a number of factors such as age of the accounts receivable balances, credit quality, historical experience, and current economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. In circumstances where the Company is aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to the Company, a specific allowance for bad debts is estimated and recorded which reduces the recognized receivable to the estimated amount Trimble believes will ultimately be collected. In addition to specific customer identification of potential bad debts, bad debt charges are recorded based on the Company’s recent past loss history and an overall assessment of past due trade accounts receivable amounts outstanding.

Inventories 

Trimble’s inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with costs primarily computed on a standard cost basis. Adjustments to reduce the cost of inventory to its net realizable value, if required, are made for estimated excess, obsolescence, or impaired balances. Factors influencing these adjustments include decline in demand, technological changes, product life cycle and development plans, component cost trends, product pricing, physical deterioration, and quality issues. If actual factors are less favorable than those projected by us, additional inventory write-downs may be required

Internal-Use Software Development Costs

The Company capitalizes material software development costs for internal use pursuant to Statement of Position No. 98-1, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.”

Goodwill, Purchased Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets 

Intangible assets include goodwill, distribution channels, patents, licenses, technology, acquired backlog and trademarks which are capitalized at acquisition cost. Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized on the straight-line basis. Useful lives generally range from three to seven years with weighted average useful life of 5.3 years.

If facts and circumstances indicate that intangible assets or property and equipment may be impaired, an evaluation of continuing value would be performed. The process of evaluating the potential impairment of goodwill is subjective and requires significant assumptions If an evaluation is required, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with these assets would be compared to their carrying amount to determine if a write-down to fair market value or discounted cash flow value is required.


Trimble performed an annual impairment test of goodwill at the end of the third fiscal quarter of 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, and concluded there was no impairment of goodwill. Trimble will continue to evaluate its goodwill for impairment on an annual basis at the end of each fiscal third quarter and whenever events and changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

Revenue Recognition

Trimble’s revenues are recorded in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition.” The Company recognizes product revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. In instances where final acceptance of the product is specified by the customer or is uncertain, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met.

Contracts and customer purchase orders are typically used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. The Company assesses whether the fee is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. The Company assesses collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customer’s payment history.

Trimble’s shipment terms for US orders, and international orders fulfilled from its European distribution center are typically FCA (Free Carrier) shipping point, except certain sales to US government agencies which are shipped FOB destination. FCA shipping point means that we fulfill the obligation and title has passed to the buyer upon delivery of the goods to the carrier named by the buyer at the named place or point. If no precise point is indicated by the buyer, Trimble may choose within the place or range stipulated where the carrier will take the goods into carrier’s charge. FOB destination means revenue for orders are not recognized until the product is delivered and title has transferred to the buyer. We bear all costs and risks of loss or damage to the goods up to that point. Shipping and handling costs are included in the cost of goods sold.

Revenue to distributors and resellers is recognized upon delivery, assuming all other criteria for revenue recognition have been met. Distributors and resellers do not have a right of return.

Revenues from purchased extended warranty and support agreements are deferred and recognized ratably over the term of the warranty/support period.

The Company applies Statement of Position (SOP) No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition” to products where the embedded software is more than incidental to the functionality of the hardware. This determination requires significant judgment including a consideration of factors such as the marketing, research and development efforts and any postcustomer contract support relating to the embedded software.

In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,” when a non-software sale involves multiple elements the entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each respective element based on its relative fair value and recognized when revenue recognition criteria for each element are met.

Software revenue is recognized in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition” and Statement of Position (SOP) No. 98-9, “Modification of SOP 97-2.” Trimble’s software arrangements generally consist of a perpetual license fee and post contract customer support (PCS). Trimble has established vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value for its PCS contracts based on the renewal rate. The remaining value of the software arrangement is allocated to the license fee using the residual method, which revenue is primarily recognized when the software has been delivered and there are no remaining obligations. Revenue from PCS is recognized ratably over the term of the PCS agreement.

A reserve for sales returns is established based on historical trends in product return rates experienced in the ordinary course of business. The reserve for estimated future returns is recorded as a reduction of our accounts receivable and revenue. If the actual returns were to deviate from the historical data on which the sales reserve had been established, the Company’s revenue could be adversely affected.


Warranty

The Company accrues for warranty costs as part of its cost of sales based on associated material product costs, technical support labor costs, and costs incurred by third parties performing work on the Company’s behalf. Trimble’s expected future cost is primarily estimated based upon historical trends in the volume of product returns within the warranty period and the cost to repair or replace the equipment. The products sold are generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from 90 days to three years, and in some instances up to 5.5 years.

While the Company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of component suppliers, its warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage, and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Should actual product failure rates, material usage, or service delivery costs differ from the estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty accrual and related costs may be required.

Changes in the Company’s product warranty liability during the 12 months ended December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, are as follows:

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
(In thousands)
          
           
Beginning balance
  
$
7,466
  
$
6,425
  
Warranties accrued
    
8,446
    
7,960
  
Warranty claims
    
(7,305
)
  
(6,919
)
Ending Balance
 
$
8,607
  
$
7,466
  


Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others

In the normal course of business to facilitate sales of its products, the Company indemnifies other parties, including customers, lessors, and parties to other transactions with the Company, with respect to certain matters. The Company has agreed to hold the other party harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations or covenants, or out of intellectual property infringement or other claims made against certain parties. These agreements may limit the time within which an indemnification claim can be made and the amount of the claim. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its officers and directors, and the Company’s bylaws contain similar indemnification obligations to the Company’s agents.

It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments made by the Company under these agreements were not material and no liabilities have been recorded for these obligations on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005.

Advertising Costs 

The Company expenses all advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses were approximately $16.1 million, $14.8 million, and $9.5 million, in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Research and Development Costs 

Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. Cost of software developed for external sale subsequent to reaching technical feasibility were not considered material and were expensed as incurred. The Company received third party funding of approximately $7.8 million, $9.0 million, and $7.7 million in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004 respectively. The Company offsets research and development expenses with any third party funding received. The Company retains the rights to any technology developed under such arrangements.

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Standard of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) requires employee stock options and rights to purchase shares under stock participation plans to be accounted for under the fair value method, and eliminates the ability to account for these instruments under the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principals Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, and allowed under the original provisions of SFAS 123.


Trimble has adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method. As a result, the Company’s financial statements for fiscal periods after December 30, 2005 include stock-based compensation expenses that are not comparable to financial statements of fiscal periods prior to December 30, 2005. SFAS 123(R) requires stock-based compensation to be estimated using the fair value on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is expected to vest is recognized as expense over the related employees’ requisite service periods in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company accounted for stock-based compensation to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25 as allowed under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). Under the intrinsic value method, no stock-based compensation expense had been recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income because the exercise price of the Company’s stock options granted to employees and directors equaled the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. Note 14 of the Consolidated Financial Statements describe the plans operated by Trimble.

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, related to employee stock-based compensation included in the Consolidated Statements of Income in accordance with SFAS 123(R) for the year ended December 29, 2006.
 

Year Ended
      
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(in thousands)
                  
                   
Cost of sales
        
$
1,173
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
                           
Research & development
          
2,554
    
-
    
-
  
Sales & marketing
          
2,814
    
-
    
-
  
General & administrative
          
6,029
    
-
    
-
  
Stock-based compensation expense included in operating expenses
          
11,397
    
-
    
-
  
                           
Total stock-based compensation
          
12,570
   
-
    
-
  
Tax benefit
    
(1)
    
(1,185
)
  
-
    
-
  
Total stock-based compensation, net of tax
        
$
11,385
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
Effect of FAS 123(R) on basic earnings per share
        
$
0.10
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
Effect of FAS 123(R) on diluted earnings per share
        
$
0.10
  
$
-
  
$
-
  

(1) Tax benefit related to US non-qualified options only as allowed by the applicable tax requirements using the statutory tax rate for the year ended December 29, 2006.

The table below provides pro forma information for the year ended December 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, as if Trimble had accounted for its employee stock options and purchases under the employee stock purchase plan in accordance with SFAS 123.

 
Fiscal Years Ended
      
 December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
               
                
Net income - as reported
        
$
84,855
 
$
67,680
  
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax
    
(1)
    
11,149
    
9,986
  
Net income - pro forma
        
$
73,706
  
$
57,694
  
                     
Basic earnings per share - as reported
        
$
0.80
  
$
0.66
  
Basic earnings per share - pro forma
        
$
0.69
  
$
0.56
  
                     
Diluted earnings per share - as reported
        
$
0.75
  
$
0.62
  
Diluted earnings per share - pro forma
        
$
0.65
  
$
0.52
  


(1) Includes compensation expense for employee stock purchase plan for the year ended December 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, and reduction of tax benefits for stock-based compensation other than non-qualified stock options which were not included in the pro forma disclosure of Trimble’s fiscal 2005 and 2004 Form 10-K. Tax benefit relates to non-qualified options only as allowed by the applicable tax requirements using the statutory tax rate as of December 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.


Options

Stock option expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is expected to vest during the period. Stock option expense recognized in the Company’s Consolidated of Income for the year ended December 29, 2006 included compensation expense for stock options granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 30, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123 and compensation expense for the stock options granted subsequent to December 30, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company changed its method of attributing the value of stock option to expense from the accelerated multiple-option approach to the straight-line single option method. Compensation expense for all stock options granted on or prior to December 30, 2005 will continue to be recognized using the accelerated multiple-option approach while compensation expense for all stock options granted subsequent to December 30, 2005 will be recognized using the straight-line single-option method. SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. In the Company’s pro forma information required under SFAS 123 for the periods prior to fiscal 2006, the Company accounted for forfeitures as they occurred.

For options granted prior to October 1, 2005, the fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For stock options granted on or after October 1, 2005, the fair value of each award is estimated on the date of grant using a binomial valuation model. Similar to the Black-Scholes model, the binomial model takes into account variables such as volatility, dividend yield rate, and risk free interest rate. In addition, the binomial model incorporates actual option-pricing behavior and changes in volatility over the option’s contractual term. For these reasons, the Company believes that the binomial model provides a fair value that is more representative of actual experience and future expected experience than the value calculated using the Black-Scholes model.
 
Under the binomial and Black-Scholes models, the estimated fair values of each employee stock option granted during fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004 were $8.04, $7.27 and $6.93, respectively. The value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the binomial model for options granted during and after the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, and the Black-Scholes option pricing model for options granted during and prior to the third quarter of fiscal 2005, with the following assumptions:

 
December 29,
2006
December 30,
2005
December 31,
2004
Expected dividend yield
-
-
-
Expected stock price volatility
42%
47%
56%
Risk free interest rate
4.8%
4.3%
3.5%
Expected life of options after vesting
1.3 years
1.7 years
1.6 years
 
 
Expected Dividend Yield - The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectation of dividend payouts.

Expected Stock Price Volatility - The Company’s computation of expected volatility is based on a combination of implied volatilities from traded options on the Company’s stock and historical volatility. The Company used implied and historical volatility as the combination was more representative of future stock price trends than historical volatility alone.

Expected Risk Free Interest Rate - The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option.

Expected Life Of Option - The Company’s expected term represents the period that the Company’s stock options are expected to be outstanding and was determined based on historical experience of similar stock options with consideration to the contractual terms of the stock options, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, rights to purchase shares are generally granted during the second and fourth quarter of each year. The fair value of rights granted under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The estimated weighted average value of rights granted under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan during fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004 were $5.16, $4.94 and $3.66, respectively. The fair value of rights granted during 2006, 2005, and 2004 was estimated at the date of grant using the following assumptions:

Fiscal years ended
December 29,
2006
December 30,
2005
December 31,
2004
Expected dividend yield
-
-
-
Expected stock price volatility
35.5%
47%
46%
Risk free interest rate
4.8%
3.5%
1.7%
Expected life of purchase
0.6 years
0.5 years
0.5 years

Expected Dividend Yield - The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectation of dividend payouts.

Expected Stock Price Volatility - The Company’s computation of expected volatility is based on implied volatilities from traded options on the Company’s stock. The Company used implied volatility because it is representative of future stock price trends during the purchase period.

Expected Risk Free Interest Rate - The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the purchase period.

Expected Life Of Purchase - The Company’s expected life of the purchase is based on the term of the offering period of the purchase plan.
 
Depreciation

Depreciation of property and equipment owned is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives or the lease terms. Useful lives include a range from two to six years for machinery and equipment, five years for furniture and fixtures, two to five years for computer equipment and software, and the life of the lease for leasehold improvements. The costs of repairs and maintenance are expensed when incurred, while expenditures for refurbishments and improvements that significantly add to the productive capacity or extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized. Depreciation expense was $13.5 million in fiscal 2006, $10.7 million in fiscal 2005, and $8.9 million in fiscal 2004.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method whereby deferred tax asset or liability account balances are calculated at the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized.


Computation of Earnings Per Share 

Number of shares used in calculation of basic earnings per share represents the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period and excludes any dilutive effects of options, warrants, and convertible securities. The dilutive effects of options, warrants, and convertible securities are included in diluted earnings per share.


New Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, "Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)." SFAS 158 requires companies to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit post-retirement plan as an asset or liability in its balance sheet, recognize as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, amounts accumulated at the date of adoption due to delayed recognition of actuarial gains and losses, prior service costs and credits, and transition assets and obligations, and provide additional disclosures, effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. On December 29, 2006, Trimble adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS 158. The effect of adopting these provisions of SFAS 158 on the Company’s financial condition at December 29, 2006 has been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. These provisions of SFAS 158 did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition at December 30, 2005 or December 31, 2004. See Note 15 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. 

SFAS 158 also requires companies to measure the funded status of the plan as of the date of its fiscal year-end, with limited exceptions, effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. For Trimble, this provision of SFAS 158 will be effective for the fiscal year ended 2008.   The Company is currently evaluating this provision of SFAS 158 and its possible impacts on the Company’s financial statements.  

In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 applies to all tax positions related to income taxes subject to SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.”  Under FIN 48 a company would recognize the benefit from a tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the position would be sustained upon audit based solely on the technical merits of the tax position. FIN 48 clarifies how a company would measure the income tax benefits from the tax positions that are recognized, provides guidance as to the timing of the derecognition of previously recognized tax benefits and describes the methods for classifying and disclosing the liabilities within the financial statements for any unrecognized tax benefits.    FIN 48 also addresses when a company should record interest and penalties related to tax positions and how the interest and penalties may be classified within the income statement and presented in the balance sheet.  FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.  For Trimble, FIN 48 will be effective for the first quarter of fiscal 2007.  Differences between the amounts recognized in the statements of operations prior to and after the adoption of FIN 48 would be accounted for as a cumulative effect adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings.    The Company is currently evaluating FIN 48 and its possible impacts on the Company’s financial statements.   Upon adoption, there is a possibility that the cumulative effect would result in a charge or benefit to the beginning balance of retained earnings.


NOTE 3: EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following data show the amounts used in computing earnings per share and the effect on the weighted-average number of shares of potentially dilutive common stock.

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(In thousands, except per share data)
                 
                  
Numerator:
                 
Income available to common shareholders:
                 
Used in basic and diluted earnings per share
  
$
103,658
  
$
84,855
  
$
67,680
  
                     
Denominator:
                    
Weighted average number of common shares used in basic earnings per share
    
110,044
   
106,432
   
102,326
 
Effect of dilutive securities (using treasury stock method):
                    
Common stock options
    
5,134
   
5,900
   
5,894
  
Common stock warrants
    
894
   
1,306
   
1,676
  
Weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares used in diluted earnings per share
    
116,072
   
113,638
   
109,896
 
                           
Basic earnings per share
  
$
0.94
  
$
0.80
  
$
0.66
  
Diluted earnings per share
  
$
0.89
  
$
0.75
  
$
0.62
  
 

NOTE 4: BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

Acquisitions

The following is a summary of acquisitions made by Trimble during fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004 all of which were accounted for as purchases:

Acquisition
  
Primary Service or Product
  
Operating Segment
  
Acquisition Date
Spacient Technologies, Inc.
  
Enterprise field service management and mobile mapping solutions
  
Field Solutions
  
November 21, 2006
Meridian Project Systems, Inc.
  
Enterprise project management and lifecycle software
  
Engineering & Construction
  
November 7, 2006
XYZ Solutions, Inc.
  
Real-time, interactive 3D intelligence software
  
Engineering & Construction
  
October 27, 2006
Visual Statement, Inc.
  
Desktop software tools
  
Mobile Solutions
  
October 11, 2006
Intransix
  
Mobile GPS applications
  
Advanced Devices
  
April 21, 2006
BitWyse Solutions, Inc.
  
Engineering and construction information management software
  
Engineering & Construction
  
May 1, 2006
Eleven Technology, Inc.
  
Mobile application software
  
Mobile Solutions
  
April 28, 2006
Quantm International, Inc.
  
Transportation route optimization solution
  
Engineering & Construction
  
April 5, 2006
XYZs of GPS, Inc.
 
Real-time Global Navigation Satellite System
  
Engineering & Construction
  
February 26, 2006
Advanced Public Safety, Inc.
  
Mobile and handheld software for public safety
  
Mobile Solutions
  
December 30, 2005
MobileTech Solutions, Inc.
  
Field workforce automation solutions
  
Mobile Solutions
  
October 25, 2005
Apache Technologies, Inc.
  
Laser detection technology
  
Engineering & Construction
  
April 19, 2005
Pacific Crest Corporation
  
Wireless data communication systems
  
Engineering & Construction
  
January 10, 2005
GeoNav GmbH
  
Customized field data collection solutions
  
Engineering and Construction
  
July 5, 2004
TracerNET Corp.
  
Wireless fleet management solutions
  
Mobile Solutions
  
March 5, 2004
 

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the operating results of each business from the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effects of each of these acquisitions were not material to the Company’s results.

The total purchase consideration for each of the above acquisitions was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition. The fair value of intangible assets acquired is generally determined based on the discount cash flow analysis performed by third-party experts. Acquisition costs directly related to the acquisitions were capitalized.

At the date of each acquisition, the projects associated with in-process research and development (IPR&D) efforts had not yet reached technological feasibility and the research and development in process had no alternative future uses. Accordingly, the value assigned to these IPR&D amounts were charged to expense on the respective acquisition date of each of the acquired companies. Trimble recorded IPR&D expense of $1.9 million and $1.1 million relating to acquisitions made in fiscal 2006 and 2005. We did not record any IPR&D expense in fiscal 2004.
 
The following table summarizes the Company’s business combinations completed during fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):
 
Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
               
Purchase price
  
$
114,442
  
$
63,830
  
$
12,246
  
Purchase price adjustments
    
4,964
    
1,595
    
1,167
  
Acquisition costs
    
2,127
    
466
   
279
 
Total purchase price
  
$
121,533
  
$
65,891
  
$
13,692
  
                     
Purchase price allocation:
                    
Fair value of net assets acquired
  
$
1,142
  
$
1,237
  
$
2,649
  
Identified intangible assets
    
52,471
    
21,171
   
2,117
  
In-Process Research & Development
    
1,930
    
1,100
   
-
  
Goodwill
    
65,990
    
42,383
   
8,926
 
Total
  
$
121,533
  
$
65,891
  
$
13,692
  

Certain acquisitions include additional earn-out cash payments based on future revenue derived from existing products. These earn-out payments are considered additional purchase price consideration. Earn-out cash payments made for fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004 were $4.5 million, $1.6 million and $1.2 million respectively. Earn-outs and changes in purchase price allocation estimates were recorded as purchase price adjustments and goodwill adjustments. Acquisitions made by Trimble have additional potential earn-out cash payments not to exceed approximately $73.3 million.

Intangible Assets

The following tables present details of the Company’s total intangible assets:

As of
  
December 29,
 2006
  
 December 30,
 2005
  
(In thousands)
           
            
Intangible assets:
           
Intangible assets with definite life:
           
Existing technology
  
$
92,430
  
$
48,100
  
Trade names, trademarks, patents, backlog and other intellectual properties
    
37,690
    
26,808
  
Total intangible assets with definite life
    
130,120
    
74,908
  
Less accumulated amortization
    
(62,948
)
  
(47,598
)
Total net intangible assets
  
$
67,172
  
$
27,310
  
 
 
Total intangible assets before accumulated amortization increased by $55.2 million primarily due to $52.5 million in intangible assets purchased in connection with acquisitions in fiscal 2006 and $2.4 million in foreign exchange rate translation impact on non-US currency denominated intangible assets. Accumulated amortization increased by $15.4 million primarily due to amortization expenses of $13.3 million and $2.1 million in foreign exchange rate translation impact on non-US currency denominated intangible assets.

The following table presents details of the amortization expense of purchased and other intangible assets as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income:

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(In thousands)
              
               
Reported as:
              
Cost of sales
  
$
5,168
  
$
165
  
$
183
  
Operating expenses
    
8,091
    
6,855
    
8,327
  
Total
  
$
13,259
  
$
7,020
  
$
8,510
  

Total amortization expense of intangible assets for fiscal 2006 increased by $6.2 million primarily due to an increase in intangible assets purchased in connection with acquisitions in fiscal 2006.

The estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets as of December 29, 2006, is as follows (in thousands):

   
Amortization Expense
  
2007
  
$
17,805
  
2008
    
15,916
  
2009
    
12,919
  
2010
    
10,721
  
2011
    
6,470
  
Thereafter
    
3,341
  
Total
  
$
67,172
  

Goodwill

Goodwill consisted of the following:

As of
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
(In thousands)
           
            
Goodwill, Spectra Precision acquisition
  
$
209,693
  
$
196,676
  
Goodwill, other acquisitions
    
164,817
    
89,470
  
Goodwill
  
$
374,510
  
$
286,146
  

The increase in goodwill of approximately $88.4 million during fiscal 2006 was primarily due to $56.5 million in goodwill from acquisitions in fiscal 2006 and $4.5 million in earn-out amounts recorded in fiscal 2006 related to the Apache, Mensi, XYZs of GPS, Mobile-Tech Solutions and Tracer-Net acquisitions. Goodwill also increased by $13.5 million due to the foreign exchange rate translation impact on non-US currency denominated goodwill assets. See Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding Trimble’s goodwill by operating segment.


NOTE 5: JOINT VENTURES
 
Caterpillar Trimble Control Technologies Joint Venture

On April 1, 2002, Caterpillar Trimble Control Technologies LLC (“CTCT”), a joint venture formed by Trimble and Caterpillar began operations. The joint venture is 50% owned by Trimble and 50% owned by Caterpillar, with equal voting rights. The joint venture is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, Trimble’s share of profits and losses are included in expenses for affiliated operations, net in the non-operating income (expense), net section of the Consolidated Statements of Income. CTCT develops and markets advanced electronic guidance and control products for earth moving machines in the construction and mining industries.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2002, Trimble received a special cash distribution of $11.0 million from CTCT. Trimble had recorded the cash distribution of $11.0 million as a deferred gain and amortized it to the extent that losses were attributable from CTCT under the equity method of accounting. Since the joint venture is now profitable on a sustainable basis and future operating losses are not anticipated, Trimble recognized the unamortized portion of the gain or $9.2 million in fiscal 2005 as income in non operating income/expense.

Trimble acts as a contract manufacturer for CTCT. Products are manufactured based on orders received from CTCT and are sold at cost plus a mark up to CTCT. CTCT resells products to both Caterpillar and Trimble for sales through their respective distribution channels. Generally, Trimble sells products to the after market dealer channel, and Caterpillar sells products for factory and dealer installation. CTCT does not hold inventory in that the resale of products to Caterpillar and Trimble occur simultaneously when the products are purchased from Trimble.

Beginning in the first fiscal quarter of 2006, Trimble included the impact of certain transactions with CTCT in revenue and cost of sales. Revenue and cost of sales were recorded for the manufacturing of products that are sold to CTCT and then sold through the Caterpillar distribution channel. Cost of sales transactions also include the purchasing of products from CTCT at a higher price than Trimble's original manufacturing costs for products sold through the Trimble distribution channel. Prior to the first fiscal quarter of 2006, these transactions were included in income (expense) for affiliated operations, net in the non-operating income (expense), net section of the Consolidated Statements of Income. The change in presentation resulted from the Company’s assessment of CTCT’s advancement and ability to function as a stand-alone company. In addition, the Company’s exclusive manufacturing agreement with CTCT ended during fiscal 2005. As a result, during the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company deemed transactions between CTCT and Trimble to be arms-length and concluded they should be presented similarly to other vendor and customer relationships. The impact of this change in presentation was an $18.1 million decrease in gross margins for fiscal 2006. There was no impact on net income.

Trimble received reimbursement of employee-related costs from CTCT for Trimble employees dedicated to CTCT or performing work for CTCT totaling $13.5 million for fiscal 2006 and $9.7 million for both fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004. The reimbursements were offset against operating expenses. Dividends received from CTCT amounted to $2.0 million in fiscal 2006 and $0 in fiscal 2005 and were recorded against long-term investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(In millions)
              
               
CTCT incremental pricing effects, net
  
$
-
  
$
11.4
  
$
8.8
  
Trimble's 50% share of CTCT's reported (gain) loss
    
(5.7
)
  
(2.0
)
  
0.5
  
Amortization of deferred gain
    
-
    
(9.2
)
  
(0.7
)
Total CTCT expense (gain) for affiliated operations, net
   
($5.7
)
$
0.2
  
$
8.6
  

The net outstanding balance due from CTCT was $0.3 million at December 29, 2006 and $0.2 million at December 30, 2005 and was included in other receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


Nikon-Trimble Joint Venture

On March 28, 2003, Nikon-Trimble Co., Ltd (“Nikon-Trimble”), a joint venture was formed by Trimble and Nikon Corporation. The joint venture began operations in July 2003 and is 50% owned by Trimble and 50% owned by Nikon, with equal voting rights. It focuses on the design and manufacture of surveying instruments including mechanical total stations and related products.

Nikon-Trimble is the distributor in Japan for Nikon and Trimble products. Trimble is the exclusive distributor outside of Japan for Nikon branded survey products. For products sold from Trimble to the Nikon-Trimble, revenue is recognized by Trimble on a sell-through basis from Nikon-Trimble to the end customer. Profits from these inter-company sales are eliminated.

The terms and conditions of the sales of products from Trimble to Nikon-Trimble are comparable with those of the standard distribution agreements which Trimble maintains with its dealer channel and margins earned are similar to those from third party dealers. Similarly, the purchases of product by Trimble from the Nikon-Trimble are made on terms comparable with the arrangements which Nikon maintained with its international distribution channel prior to the formation of the joint venture with Trimble.

Trimble uses the equity method of accounting for its investment in Nikon-Trimble, with 50% share of profit or loss from this joint venture reported by Trimble in the non-operating income (expense), net section of the Consolidated Statements of Income under the heading of income (expense) for affiliated operations, net. Trimble reported a profit of approximately $1.3 million for fiscal 2006, a loss of $36,000 for fiscal 2005 and a profit of $1.1 million for fiscal 2004, respectively, as its proportionate share of the net income. In the second quarter of fiscal 2006, Trimble began recording its proportionate share of profit or loss in the joint venture one month in arrears.  The impact of this change was not material. In fiscal 2006 and 2005, dividends received from Nikon-Trimble, amounted to $257,000 and $515,000, respectively, and were recorded against long-term investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

At December 29, 2006, the net payable to Trimble by Nikon-Trimble, related to the purchase and sale of products from and to Nikon-Trimble, is $0.5 million and is recorded within accounts payable, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. At December 30, 2005, the net payable by Trimble to Nikon-Trimble, related to the purchase and sale of products from and to Nikon-Trimble, was $2.0 million and was included in accounts payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The carrying amount of the investment was approximately $14.0 million at December 29, 2006 and $12.9 million at December 30, 2005 and was recorded in other non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


NOTE 6: CERTAIN BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS

The following tables provide details of selected balance sheet items (in thousands):
 
As of
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
Inventories:
          
Raw materials
  
$
66,853
  
$
52,199
  
Work-in-process
    
6,181
    
7,249
  
Finished goods
    
39,518
    
48,403
  
Total
  
$
112,552
  
$
107,851
  
               
Property and equipment, net:
          
Machinery and equipment
  
$
79,238
  
$
72,273
  
Furniture and fixtures
    
12,399
    
10,110
 
Leasehold improvements
    
13,124
    
8,695
 
Buildings
    
5,689
    
5,707
 
Land
    
1,231
    
1,231
 
     
111,681
    
98,016
 
Less accumulated depreciation
    
(63,683
)
  
(55,352
)
Total
  
$
47,998
  
$
42,664
  
           
Other Non-Current Liabilities:
          
Deferred compensation
  
$
5,887
  
$
3,231
  
Pension
    
6,616
    
5,529
  
Deferred Rent
    
5,327
    
3,364
  
Other long term liabilities
    
9,689
    
6,917
  
Total
  
$
27,519
  
$
19,041
  
 
 
During the year, accumulated depreciation increased by $8.3 million primarily due to $13.5 million in depreciation expense and $2.1 million in foreign exchange translation rate impact, offset by the write-off of fully depreciated assets and disposals in the amount of $7.6 million.

Other non-current liabilities include deferred rent primarily as a result of the Sunnyvale, California lease, executed in fiscal 2005 and a new Westminster, Colorado lease, executed in fiscal 2006.


NOTE 7: REPORTING SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Trimble is a designer and distributor of positioning products and applications enabled by GPS, optical, laser, and wireless communications technology. The Company provides products for diverse applications in its targeted markets.

To achieve distribution, marketing, production, and technology advantages, the Company manages its operations in the following four segments:

 
·
Engineering and Construction — Consists of products currently used by survey and construction professionals in the field for positioning, data collection, field computing, data management, and machine guidance and control. The applications served include surveying, road, runway, construction, site preparation and building construction.

 
·
Field Solutions — Consists of products that provide solutions in a variety of agriculture and geographic information systems (GIS) applications. In agriculture these include precise land leveling and machine guidance systems. In GIS they include handheld devices and software that enable the collection of data on assets for a variety of governmental and private entities.

 
·
Mobile Solutions — Consists of products that enable end users to monitor and manage their mobile assets by communicating location and activity-relevant information from the field to the office. Trimble offers a range of products that address a number of sectors of this market including truck fleets, security, and public safety vehicles.

 
·
Advanced Devices — The various operations that comprise this segment were aggregated on the basis that no single operation accounted for more than 10% of Trimble’s total revenue, operating income and assets. This segment is comprised of the Component Technologies, Military and Advanced Systems, Applanix and Trimble Outdoors businesses.

Trimble evaluates each of its segment's performance and allocates resources based on segment operating income from operations before income taxes, and some corporate allocations. Trimble and each of its segments employ the same accounting policies.

In the first quarter of 2006, Trimble combined the operating results of the former Components Technologies and Portfolio Technologies segments and included the combined operating results in the Advanced Devices segment. The change in presentation was made in recognition of the small size of each of the businesses relative to the total company. The presentation of prior period’s segment operating results has been changed to conform to the Company’s current segment presentation.

The following table presents revenues, operating income (loss), and identifiable assets for the four segments. Operating income (loss) is net revenue less operating expenses, excluding general corporate expenses, amortization in-process research and development expenses, restructuring charges, non-operating income (expense), and income taxes. The identifiable assets that Trimble's Chief Operating Decision Maker views by segment are accounts receivable and inventory.

 
Fiscal Years Ended
 
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(in thousands)
              
Engineering & Construction
              
Revenue
  
$
637,118
  
$
524,461
  
$
440,478
  
Operating income before corporate allocations
    
136,157
    
117,993
    
79,505
 
Accounts receivable
    
127,567
    
105,980
    
90,743
 
Inventories
    
82,827
    
80,590
    
65,116
 
Goodwill
    
296,597
    
229,176
    
238,801
  
Field Solutions
                    
Revenue
  
$
139,230
  
$
127,843
  
$
105,591
  
Operating income before corporate allocations
    
37,377
    
32,527
    
25,151
 
Accounts receivable
    
21,016
    
21,823
    
19,141
 
Inventories
    
10,946
    
11,790
    
7,016
 
Goodwill
    
1,517
    
-
    
-
  
Mobile Solutions
                    
Revenue
  
$
60,854
  
$
31,481
  
$
23,531
  
Operating income (loss) before corporate allocations
    
2,550
    
(3,072
)
  
(5,997
)
Accounts receivable
    
15,630
    
10,789
    
9,073
 
Inventories
    
1,666
    
1,983
    
5,735
 
Goodwill
    
63,430
    
44,118
    
7,660
  
Advanced Devices
                    
Revenue
  
$
102,948
  
$
91,128
  
$
99,208
  
Operating income before corporate allocations
    
10,084
    
13,212
    
18,746
  
Accounts receivable
    
16,474
    
14,033
    
17,660
 
Inventories
    
17,113
    
13,488
    
9,878
 
Goodwill
    
12,966
    
12,852
    
13,061
  
Total
                    
Revenue
  
$
940,150
  
$
774,913
  
$
668,808
  
Operating income before corporate allocations
    
186,168
    
160,660
    
117,405
 
Accounts receivable (1)
    
180,687
    
152,625
    
136,617
 
Inventories
    
112,552
    
107,851
    
87,745
 
Goodwill
    
374,510
    
286,146
    
259,522
  

(1) As presented, accounts receivable represents trade receivables, gross, which are specified between segments.

The following are reconciliations corresponding to totals in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements:

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(in thousands)
              
Consolidated segment operating income
 
$
186,168
  
$
160,660
  
$
117,405
  
Unallocated corporate expense
    
(35,798
)
  
(27,483
)
  
(22,901
)
Restructuring charges
          
(278
)
  
(552
)
Amortization of purchased intangible assets
   
(13,074
)
  
(6,855
)
  
(8,327
)
In-process research and development
    
(1,930
)
  
(1,100
)
  
-
  
Non-operating expense, net
    
12,726
    
(156
)
  
(10,701
)
Consolidated income before income taxes
  
$
148,092
  
$
124,788
  
$
74,924
  


As of
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
(in thousands)
          
Assets:
          
Accounts receivable total for reportable segments
  
$
180,687
  
$
152,625
  
Unallocated (1)
    
(8,679
)
  
(7,525
)
Accounts receivable, net
  
$
172,008
  
$
145,100
  
 
(1) Includes trade-related accruals, allowances, and cash received in advance.


The distribution of Trimble’s gross consolidated revenue by segment is summarized in the table below. Gross consolidated revenue includes external and internal sales. Total external consolidated revenue is reported net of eliminations of internal sales between segments.

   
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
           
(In thousands)
          
           
Engineering and Construction
  
$
641,352
  
$
529,034
  
Field Solutions
    
139,230
    
127,843
 
Mobile Solutions
    
60,854
    
31,481
 
Advanced Devices
    
102,873
    
91,182
 
Total Gross Consolidated Revenue
    
944,309
    
779,540
  
Eliminations
    
(4,159
)
  
(4,627
)
Total External Consolidated Revenue
  
$
940,150
  
$
774,913
  

The geographic distribution of Trimble’s revenues and identifiable assets is summarized in the tables below. Other foreign countries include Canada, and countries in South and Central America, the Middle East, and Africa. Revenue is defined as revenues from external customers. Identifiable assets indicated in the table below exclude inter-company receivables, investments in subsidiaries, goodwill, and intangibles assets.

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(in thousands)
              
               
Revenue (1):
              
United States
  
$
511,030
  
$
415,443
  
$
331,607
  
Europe
    
231,428
    
191,734
    
186,197
  
Asia Pacific
    
112,465
    
88,315
    
86,117
  
Other Non-US Countries
    
85,227
    
79,421
    
64,886
  
Total Consolidated Revenue
  
$
940,150
  
$
774,913
  
$
668,808
  
(1) Revenue attributed to countries based on the location of the customer.


As of
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
(in thousands)
          
           
Identifiable assets:
          
United States
  
$
347,474
  
$
295,196
  
Europe
    
143,038
    
120,582
  
Asia Pacific and Other Non-US Countries
    
30,190
    
13,853
  
Total Identifiable Assets
  
$
520,702
  
$
429,631
  

Transfers between US and non-US geographic areas are made at prices based on total costs and contributions of the supplying geographic area. The Company's subsidiaries in Asia have derived revenue from commissions from US operations in each of the periods presented. These commission revenues and expenses are excluded from total revenue and operating income (loss) in the preceding table. Other than the United States, no other country comprised more than 10% of sales to unaffiliated customers for any periods presented, except as disclosed above.

No single customer accounted for 10% or more of Trimble's total revenues in fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004.


NOTE 8: RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

There were no restructuring charges recorded in fiscal 2006. Restructuring charges of $0.3 million, and $0.6 million were recorded in fiscal years 2005 and 2004 respectively. The charges in fiscal 2005 were primarily related to office closure costs due to integration efforts of the Mensi acquisition. The charges in fiscal 2004 were primarily related to severance costs due to the realignment of Trimble Mobile Solutions Inc. As a result of the realignment, the headcount decreased by 36 in fiscal 2004. As of December 29, 2006, an accrual balance of $0.1 million, related to the fiscal 2005 office closure, is expected to be paid over the next several years. The restructuring accrual is included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets under the heading of “Accrued Liabilities”.
 

NOTE 9: LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

As of
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
(In thousands)
          
           
Credit Facilities:
          
Term loan
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
Revolving credit facility
    
-
    
-
  
Promissory notes and other
    
481
    
649
  
     
481
    
649
  
               
Less current portion of long-term debt
    
-
    
216
  
Non-current portion
 
$
481
  
$
433
  

The following summarizes the future cash payment obligations (excluding interest) as of December 29, 2006:

 
  
Total
  
2007
  
2008
  
2009
  
2010
  
2011
  
2011 and
Beyond
  
(in thousands)
                             
                               
Promissory note and other
    
481
   
-
    
115
    
366
            
-
    
-
  
Total contractual cash obligations
  
$
481
  
$
-
  
$
115
  
$
366
   $        
$
-
  
$
-
  

Credit Facilities

On July 28, 2005, the Company entered into a $200 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (“2005 Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of 10 banks with The Bank of Nova Scotia as the administrative agent. The 2005 Credit Facility replaces the Company’s $175 million secured 2003 Credit Facility. The funds available under the new 2005 Credit Facility may be used by the Company for general corporate purposes and up to $25 million of the 2005 Credit Facility may be used for letters of credit.
 
The Company may borrow funds under the 2005 Credit Facility in U.S. Dollars or in certain other currencies, and will bear interest, at the Company's option, at either: (i) a base rate, based on the administrative agent's prime rate, plus a margin of between 0% and 0.125%, depending on the Company's leverage ratio as of its most recently ended fiscal quarter, or (ii) a reserve-adjusted rate based on LIBOR, EURIBOR, STIBOR or other agreed-upon rate, depending on the currency borrowed, plus a margin of between 0.625% and 1.125%, depending on the Company's leverage ratio as of the most recently ended fiscal quarter. The Company's obligations under the 2005 Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain of the Company's domestic subsidiaries.
 
The 2005 Credit Facility contains customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants including, among other requirements, negative covenants that restrict the Company's ability to dispose of assets, create liens, incur indebtedness, repurchase stock, pay dividends, make acquisitions, make investments, enter into mergers and consolidations and make capital expenditures, and financial covenants that require the maintenance of leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios. The 2005 Credit Facility contains events of default that include, among others, non-payment of principal, interest or fees, breach of covenants, inaccuracy of representations and warranties, cross defaults to certain other indebtedness, bankruptcy and insolvency events, material judgments, and events constituting a change of control. Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default, interest on the obligations will accrue at an increased rate and the lenders may accelerate the Company's obligations under the 2005 Credit Facility, however that acceleration will be automatic in the case of bankruptcy and insolvency events of default. Trimble incurs a commitment fee if the 2005 Credit Facility is not used. The commitment fee is not material to the Company’s results during all periods presented.
 

At December 29, 2006, the Company has a zero balance outstanding and was in compliance with all financial debt covenants.

Notes Payable

As of December 29, 2006, the Company had other notes payable totaling approximately $0.5 million consisting of government loans to foreign subsidiaries and loans assumed from acquisitions.


NOTE 10: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases

On January 13, 2006, Trimble entered into a lease agreement for the lease of real property located in Westminster, Colorado. The lease agreement has a seven year term, commencing June 1, 2006 and ending May 31, 2013.

On May 13, 2005, Trimble entered into a lease agreement for the lease of real property located in Sunnyvale, California. The lease agreement has a seven year term, commencing January 1, 2006 and ending December 31, 2012.

Trimble's principal facilities in the United States are leased under various cancelable and non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various dates through 2013. For tenant improvement allowances and rent holidays, Trimble records a deferred rent liability on the consolidated balance sheets and amortizes the deferred rent over the terms of the leases as reductions to rent expense on the consolidated statements of income. The Company has options to renew certain of these leases for an additional five years.

Future minimum payments required under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

   
Operating
Lease Payments
  
(In thousands)
      
       
2007
  
$
10,852
  
2008
    
9,318
 
2009
    
8,187
 
2010
    
6,414
 
2011
    
3,530
 
Thereafter
    
3,556
 
Total
  
$
41,857
  

Net rent expense under operating leases was $10.5 million in fiscal 2006, $12.6 million in fiscal 2005, and $10.9 million in fiscal 2004. Sublease income was $44,000, $39,000, and $38,000, for fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Purchase Commitments with a Supplier

Trimble entered into a significant supply agreement in fiscal 2004 that sets forth minimum purchase commitments for outsourced services. The term of the supply agreement is the earlier of four years from the initial product ship date, or when Trimble has paid for a cumulative total of 200,000 billable hours (approximately $10.4 million). Should Trimble not purchase and pay for 200,000 hours, then Trimble will compensate the supplier for 20% of the shortfall. Thereafter, the contract continues in effect until terminated by either party with 30 days prior written notice to the other party. As of December 29, 2006, based on current hours earned to date the future obligation is approximately $380,000 which is expected to be paid over the next year. Trimble does not expect a shortfall based on current hours earned to date.


NOTE 11: FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The estimated fair values of financial instruments outstanding are as follows:

   
Carrying
Amount
  
Fair
Value
  
Carrying
Amount
  
Fair
Values
  
   
December 29, 2006
  
December 30, 2005
  
As of
                  
(In thousands)
                  
                   
Assets:
                  
Cash and cash equivalents
  
$
129,621
  
$
129,621
  
$
73,853
  
$
73,853
  
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts
    
-
    
-
    
516
    
577
  
Accounts receivable, net
    
172,008
    
172,008
    
145,100
   
145,100
  
                           
Liabilities:
                          
Credit facilities
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts
    
70
    
157
 
  
-
    
-
  
Promissory note and other
    
481
    
406
    
649
    
562
  
Accounts payable
    
44,418
    
44,418
    
45,206
    
45,206
  

The fair value of the bank borrowings, and promissory notes have been estimated using an estimate of the interest rate Trimble would have had to pay on the issuance of notes with a similar maturity and discounting the cash flows at that rate. The fair values do not give an indication of the amount that Trimble would currently have to pay to extinguish any of this debt.

The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is estimated based on the difference between the market price and the carrying amount of comparable contracts. These contracts are adjusted to fair value at the end of every month. 


NOTE 12: INCOME TAXES

The components of income before income taxes are as follows:

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(In thousands)
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
United States
  
$
123,800
   
99,500
   
70,000
  
Foreign 
  
$
24,300
    
25,300
    
4,900
 
Total
  
$
148,100
  
$
124,800
    
74,900
 

Trimble's income tax provision consisted of the following:

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
               
(In thousands)
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
US Federal:
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Current
  
$
47,795
  
$
36,493
    
18,196
  
Deferred
    
(2,972
)
  
(1,534
)
  
(17,995
)
 
    
44,823
    
34,959
    
201
 
US State:
              
Current
    
2,967
    
3,500
    
2,895
  
Deferred
    
(2,168
)
  
(2,348
)
  
(897
)
 
    
799
    
1,152
    
1,998
  
Foreign:
              
Current
    
(1,493
)
  
3,102
    
3,137
  
Deferred
    
305
    
720
    
1,908
  
 
    
(1,188
)
  
3,822
    
5,045
  
Income tax provision
 
$
44,434
  
$
39,933
    
7,244
 
 

The income tax provision differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory US federal income tax rate to income before taxes. The sources and tax effects of the differences are as follows:

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(In thousands)
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Expected tax from continuing operations at 35% in all years
  
$
51,832
  
$
43,677
  
$
26,223
  
Change in valuation allowance
    
-0-
    
-0-
   
(24,004
)
US State income taxes
    
(110
)
  
749
    
1,299
  
Export sales incentives
    
(4,138
)
  
(2,316
)
  
(1,176
)
NonForeign components
    
(7,682
)
  
3,684
    
5,134
  
US Federal research and development credit
    
(662
)
  
(895
)
  
(508
)
In process research & development
    
1,046
    
-0-
    
-0-
  
Stock option compensation
    
3.626
    
-0-
    
-0-
  
Benefit from repatriation legislation
    
(1,050
)
  
(6,445
)
  
-0-
 
Other
    
1,572
    
1,479
    
276
  
Income tax provision
 
$
44,434
  
$
39,933
  
$
7,244
  
 
              
Effective tax rate
    
30
%
  
32
%
  
10
%

The components of deferred taxes consist of the following:

As of
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
(In thousands)
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Deferred tax liabilities:
  
 
  
 
  
Purchased intangibles
  
$
25,263
  
$
11,058
  
Depreciation and amortization
    
21,283
   
11,711
 
Other
   
175
    
1,516
  
Total deferred tax liabilities
    
46,721
    
24,285
  
 
          
Deferred tax assets:
          
Inventory valuation differences
    
9,469
    
8,983
  
Expenses not currently deductible
    
8,546
    
6,233
  
US Federal credit carryforwards
    
-0-
   
-0-
 
Deferred revenue
    
1,298
    
564
  
US State credit carryforwards
    
8,869
    
8,530
  
Warranty
    
2,738
    
2,361
  
 
          
US Federal net operating losscarryforward
    
2,055
    
2,669
  
Net foreign tax credits on undistributed foreign earnings
    
9,344
    
5,743
  
Accruals not currently deductible
    
8,803
    
7,452
  
Total deferred tax assets
    
51,121
    
42,535
  
Valuation allowance
    
(4,254
)
  
(5,855
)
Total deferred tax assets
    
46,867
    
36,680
  
 
          
Total net deferred tax assets
  
$
146
  
$
12,395
  

The Company has $2.1 million of tax effected US federal net operating loss carryforwards from an acquisition. Utilization of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards are subject to annual limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company has state research and development credit carryforwards of approximately $13.6 million which can be carried over indefinitely.


The company’s valuation allowance is attributable to, primarily, the California Research Credit and acquisition Net Operating Loss carryforwards.  Valuation allowance amounts are offsets to related deferred tax assets. Management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize these deferred tax assets and, accordingly, a valuation allowance has been established for such amounts. When the tax credits are utilized and the valuation allowance is released, the benefit of the release of the valuation allowance will be accounted for as a credit to shareholder’s equity rather than as a reduction of the income tax provision.

The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) provides for a special one-time elective dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S. taxpayer equal to 85% of the eligible distribution. During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company repatriated $39.5 million, of which $24 million qualified for the special one-time elective dividends received deduction and $15.5 million constituted earnings that do not qualify under the Act; previously taxed income and return of capital. The company recorded a $6.4 million tax benefit from these foreign earnings in 2005. The $1.0 million tax benefit recorded in 2006 represents a true-up adjustment to the amount recorded in 2005.

In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 applies to all tax positions related to income taxes subject to SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.”  Under FIN 48 a company would recognize the benefit from a tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the position would be sustained upon audit based solely on the technical merits of the tax position. FIN 48 clarifies how a company would measure the income tax benefits from the tax positions that are recognized, provides guidance as to the timing of the derecognition of previously recognized tax benefits and describes the methods for classifying and disclosing the liabilities within the financial statements for any unrecognized tax benefits.    FIN 48 also addresses when a company should record interest and penalties related to tax positions and how the interest and penalties may be classified within the income statement and presented in the balance sheet.  FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.  For Trimble, FIN 48 will be effective for the first quarter of fiscal 2007.  Differences between the amounts recognized in the statements of operations prior to and after the adoption of FIN 48 would be accounted for as a cumulative effect adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings.    The Company is currently evaluating FIN 48 and its possible impacts on the Company’s financial statements.   Upon adoption, there is a possibility that the cumulative effect would result in a charge or benefit to the beginning balance of retained earnings.


NOTE 13: COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The components of comprehensive income and related tax effects are as follows:

 
Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(in thousands)
              
Net income
 
$
103,658
  
$
84,855
  
$
67,680
  
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $(108) in 2006 and $308 in 2005
   
21,709
    
(24,690
)
  
14,025
 
Net gain (loss) on hedging transactions
    
-
    
(106
)
  
106
 
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS 158, net of tax
    
(136
)
  
-
    
-
  
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments
    
3
    
(34
)
  
(6
)
Total comprehensive income
  
$
125,234
  
$
60,025
  
$
81,805
  

The components of accumulated other comprehensive, net of related tax were as follows:

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
(in thousands)
          
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments
  
$
41,214
  
$
19,504
  
Adjustment to initially apply FASB Statement No. 158, net of tax
    
(136
)
  
-
  
Accumulated net unrealized gain on foreign currency
    
33
    
30
  
Total accumulated other comprehensive income
  
$
41,111
  
$
19,534
  
 

NOTE 14: EMPLOYEE STOCK BENEFIT PLANS

Employee Stock Purchase Plan 

The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“Purchase Plan”) under which an aggregate of 11,550,000 shares of Common Stock have been reserved for sale to eligible employees as approved by the shareholders to date. The plan permits full-time employees to purchase Common Stock through payroll deductions at 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the Common Stock at the beginning or at the end of each offering period, which is generally six months. The Purchase Plan terminates on September 8, 2008. In fiscal 2006 and 2005, the shares issued under the Purchase Plan were 195,398 and 359,998 shares, respectively. At December 29, 2006, the number of shares reserved for future purchases by eligible employees was 1,440,274.

Restricted Stock Award

Trimble did not grant any restricted stock in fiscal 2006 or fiscal 2004. During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company granted 40,000 shares of restricted common stock. The award vests 20% on June 30, 2005 and an additional 20% each June 30 thereafter. The Company recorded compensation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income of $191,000 and $120,000 for fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively.

2002 Stock Plan

In 2002, Trimble’s Board of Directors adopted the 2002 Stock Plan (“2002 Plan”). The 2002 Plan approved by the shareholders provides for the granting of incentive and non-statutory stock options for up to 12,000,000 shares plus any shares currently reserved but un-issued to employees, consultants, and directors of Trimble. Incentive stock options may be granted at exercise prices that are not less than 100% of the fair market value of Common Stock on the date of grant. Employee stock options granted under the 2002 Plan generally have 84-120 month terms, and vest at a rate of 20% at the first anniversary of grant and monthly thereafter at an annual rate of 20%, with full vesting occurring at the fifth anniversary of the grant. In certain instances, grants vest at a rate of 40% at the second anniversary of grant and monthly thereafter at an annual rate of 20% with full vesting occurring at the fifth anniversary of the grant. The Company issues new shares for option exercises. As of December 29, 2006, options to purchase 8,038,610 shares were outstanding and 4,453,838 were available for future grant under the 2002 Plan.

1993 Stock Option Plan  

In 1992, Trimble's Board of Directors adopted the 1993 Stock Option Plan (“1993 Plan”). The 1993 Plan, as amended to date and approved by shareholders, provided for the granting of incentive and non-statutory stock options for up to 19,125,000 shares of Common Stock to employees, consultants, and directors of Trimble. Incentive stock options may be granted at exercise prices that are not less than 100% of the fair market value of Common Stock on the date of grant. Employee stock options granted under the 1993 Plan have 120-month terms, and vest at a rate of 20% at the first anniversary of grant, and monthly thereafter at an annual rate of 20%, with full vesting occurring at the fifth anniversary of grant. The Company issues new shares for option exercises. As of December 29, 2006 options to purchase 2,692,736 shares were outstanding and no shares were available for future grant.

1992 Management Discount Stock Option Plan 

In 1992, Trimble's Board of Directors approved the 1992 Management Discount Stock Option Plan ("Discount Plan"). As of December 29, 2006, options to purchase 295,000 shares were outstanding and no shares were available for future grant under the 1992 Management Discount Stock Option Plan.

1990 Director Stock Option Plan 

In December 1990, Trimble adopted a Director Stock Option Plan under which an aggregate of 1,140,000 shares of Common Stock have been reserved for issuance to non-employee directors as approved by the shareholders to date. At December 29, 2006, options to purchase 285,000 shares were outstanding, and no shares were available for future grants under the Director Stock Option Plan.

Options Outstanding and Exercisable


Exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 29, 2006, ranged from $2.67 to $25.48. In view of the wide range of exercise prices, Trimble considers it appropriate to provide the following additional information with respect to options outstanding at December 29, 2006:
 
   
Options Outstanding
  
Options Exercisable
  
Range
  
Number
Outstanding
  
Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Share
 
Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
 
Number
Exercisable
  
Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Share
 
$  2.67 - 4.27
    
1,198,584
  
$
3.40
    
2.84
   
1,151,164
  
$
3.38
  
    4.40 - 5.45
    
1,137,822
    
5.08
    
5.38
   
962,556
    
5.08
  
    5.60 - 6.50
    
1,185,640
    
5.88
    
4.04
   
1,185,640
    
5.88
  
    6.52 - 8.02
    
251,048
    
7.29
    
4.84
   
238,928
    
7.29
  
    8.50
    
1,468,152
    
8.5
    
6.55
   
832,356
    
8.5
  
    8.78 - 13.71
    
1,144,950
    
12.44
    
5.03
   
922,590
    
12.82
  
    13.78
    
4,350
    
13.78
    
7.07
   
600
    
13.78
  
    14.53
    
1,244,334
    
14.53
    
7.81
   
457,570
    
14.53
  
    15.29 - 16.53
    
525,700
    
15.98
    
8.04
   
204,620
    
15.99
  
    17.00 - 25.48
    
3,147,600
    
20.41
    
7.95
   
356,744
    
17.80
  
Total
    
11,308,180
  
$
12.04
    
6.18
   
6,312,768
  
$
8.35
  


   
Number Of Shares
  
Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Share
 
Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
  
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
  
Options Outstanding
   
11,308,180
  
$
12.04
    
6.2
  
$
150,669
  
Options Outstanding and Expected to Vest
    
10,977,900
    
11.84
    
6.1
    
148,469
  
Options Exercisable
    
6,312,768
    
8.35
    
5.1
    
107,456
  

Options outstanding and expected to vest are adjusted for expected forfeitures. The aggregate intrinsic value is the total pretax intrinsic value based on the Company’s closing stock price of $25.37 as of December 29, 2006, which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date.

As of December 29, 2006, the total unamortized stock option expense is $22.0 million with a weighted-average recognition period of 1.7 years.

Option Activity

Activity during fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, under the combined plans was as follows:

   
December 29, 2006
 
December 30, 2005
  
December 31, 2004
  
Fiscal Years Ended
  
Options
 
Weighted average exercise price
  
Options
  
Weighted average exercise price
  
Options
  
Weighted average exercise price
  
(In thousands, except for per share data)
                          
                           
Outstanding at beginning of year
    
12,828
  
$
9.35
    
13,442
  
$
8.05
    
15,202
  
$
6.81
  
Granted
    
1,744
   
22.94
    
1,748
   
17.05
    
2,238
   
14.1
  
Exercised
    
(3,082
)
  
6.95
    
(2,120
)
  
7.37
    
(3,420
)
  
6.46
  
Cancelled
    
(178
)
  
12.99
    
(242
)
  
10.20
    
(578
)
  
8.28
  
Outstanding at end of year
    
11,308
    
12.04
    
12,828
    
9.35
    
13,442
    
8.05
  
                                       
Available for grant
    
4,460
          
3,026
          
4,550
        
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during year
        
$
8.04
        
$
7.27
        
$
6.93
  
 

Warrants

On April 12, 2002, the Company issued to Spectra-Physics Holdings USA, Inc., a warrant to purchase up to 1,128,700 shares of Trimble’s Common Stock over a fixed period of time. Initially, Spectra-Physics’ warrant entitled it to purchase 600,000 shares of Common Stock over a five-year period at an exercise price of $5.04 per share. On a quarterly basis beginning July 14, 2002, Spectra-Physics’ warrant became exercisable for an additional 750 shares of Common Stock for every $1 million of principal and interest outstanding to Spectra-Physics until the obligation was paid off in full. These shares are purchasable at a price equal to the average of Trimble’s closing price for the five days immediately proceeding the last trading day of each quarter. On July 14, 2002 an additional 52,092 shares became exercisable at an exercise price of $4.82 per share. On October 14, 2002 an additional 53,472 shares became exercisable at an exercise price of $3.06. On January 14, 2003, an additional 54,852 shares became exercisable at an exercise price of $4.52. On April 14, 2003, an additional 28,624 shares became exercisable at an exercise price of $6.69. The approximate fair value of the warrants of $2.4 million was determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: contractual life of 5-year period, risk-free interest rate of 4%; volatility of 65%; and no dividends during the contractual term. The additional shares are exercisable over a 5-year period. No additional shares will be issuable under the warrant as the underlying obligation has been paid off in full. For fiscal 2006 and 2005, there were no shares exercised related to the warrants. As of December 29, 2006, there are 789,040 shares outstanding and exercisable under the warrants.

On December 21, 2001 and January 14, 2002, in connection with the first and second closing of the private placement of the Company’s Common Stock, Trimble granted five-year warrants to purchase an additional 1,838,016 shares of Common Stock, subject to certain adjustments, at an exercise price of $6.49 per share. As of December 29, 2006, there are 162,562 shares outstanding and exercisable under the warrants.


NOTE 15: BENEFIT PLANS

401(k) Plan
 
Under Trimble’s 401(k) Plan, US employee participants (including employees of certain subsidiaries) may direct the investment of contributions to their accounts among certain mutual funds and the Trimble Navigation Limited Common Stock Fund. The Trimble Fund sold net 129,834 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate of $3.0 million in fiscal 2006. Trimble, at its discretion, matches individual employee 401(k) Plan contributions at a rate of fifty cents of every dollar that the employee contributes to the 401(k) Plan up to 5% of the employee’s annual salary to an annual maximum of $2,500. Trimble’s matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan were $2.5 million in fiscal 2006, $2.2 million in fiscal 2005, and $1.9 million in fiscal 2004.

Defined Contribution Pension Plans
 
Certain of the Company’s European subsidiaries participate in state sponsored pension plans. Contributions are based on specified percentages of employee salaries. For these plans, Trimble contributed and charged to expense approximately $0.7 million for fiscal 2006, $0.6 million for fiscal 2005, and $0.6 million for fiscal 2004.

Defined Benefit Pension Plan

Trimble provides defined benefit pension plans in Sweden, Germany, and the Netherlands. The largest of these plans is provided by the Swedish subsidiary which has an unfunded defined benefit pension plan that covered substantially all of its full-time employees through 1993. Benefits are based on a percentage of eligible earnings. The employee must have had a projected period of pensionable service of at least 30 years as of 1993. If the period was shorter, the pension benefits were reduced accordingly. Active employees do not accrue any future benefits; therefore, there is no service cost and the liability will only increase for interest cost.

On December 29, 2006, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS158. SFAS 158 required the Company to recognize the funded status (i.e., the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligations) of its pension plan in the December 29, 2006 Consolidated Balance Sheet, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. The adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income at adoption represents the net unrecognized actuarial losses and unrecognized transition obligation remaining from the initial adoption of SFAS 87, all of which were previously netted against the plan’s funded status in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets pursuant to the provisions of Statement 87. These amounts will be subsequently recognized as net periodic pension cost pursuant to the Company’s historical accounting policy for amortizing such amounts. Further, actuarial gains and losses that arise in subsequent periods and are not recognized as net periodic pension cost in the same periods will be recognized a component of other comprehensive income. Those amounts will be subsequently recognized as a component of net periodic pension cost on the same basis as the amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income at adoption of SFAS 158.


The incremental effects of adopting the provisions of SFAS 158 on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at December 29, 2006 are presented in the following table. The adoption of SFAS 158 had no effect on the Company’s consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 29, 2006, or for any prior period presented, and it will not effect the Company’s operating results in future periods. Had the Company not been required to adopt SFAS 158 at December 29, 2006, it would have recognized an additional minimum liability pursuant to then provisions of SFAS 87. The effect of recognizing the additional minimum liability is included in table below in the column labeled “Prior to Application of SFAS 158.”

   
At December 29. 2006
  
   
Prior to Application of SFAS 158
  
Effect of Application of SFAS 158
  
As Reported at December 29. 2006
  
(in thousands)
              
               
Intangible asset (pension)
  
$
82
  
$
(82
)
$
-
  
Total assets
    
978,513
    
(82
)
  
978,431
  
                     
Current accrued pension liability
    
-
    
218
    
218
  
Non-current accrued pension liability
    
6,594
    
22
    
6,616
  
Deferred income taxes
    
4,629
    
(104
)
  
4,525
  
Total liabilities
    
230,630
    
136
    
230,766
  
                     
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    
41,128
    
(17
)
  
41,111
  
Total shareholders’ equity
    
747,682
    
(17
)
  
747,665
  

The changes in the benefit obligations and plan assets of the significant non-US defined benefit pension plans for fiscal 2006 and 2005 were as follows:

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29, 2006
  
December 30, 2005
  
(in thousands)
          
           
Change in benefit obligation:
          
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
  
$
6,929
  
$
7,208
  
Adjustment to include benefit obligation for the Netherlands subsidiary (1)
    
1,412
    
-
  
Benefit obligation at beginning of year (restated)
    
8,341
  
$
7,208
  
Service cost
    
323
    
90
 
Interest cost
    
396
    
270
 
Benefits paid
    
(311
)
  
(312
)
Foreign exchange impact
    
1,253
    
(1,145
)
Actuarial (gains) losses
    
(268
)
  
818
 
Benefit obligation at end of year
    
9,734
    
6,929
 
Change in plan assets:
              
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
    
980
    
1,088
 
Adjustment to include fair value of plan assets for the Netherlands subsidiary (1)
    
1,242
    
-
  
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year (restated)
    
2,222
    
1,088
  
Actual return on plan assets
    
106
    
36
 
Employer contribution
    
455
    
339
 
Plan participants’ contributions
    
-
    
-
 
Benefits paid
    
(311
)
  
(312
)
Foreign exchange impact
    
428
    
(172
)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
    
2,900
    
980
 
                  
Benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at end of year
  
$
6,834
  
$
5,949
  
               
Current portion (included in accrued compensation and benefits)
    
218
    
-
  
Non-current portion (included in other non-current liabilities)
    
6,616
    
5,529
  
 
 
 
(2)
In 2006, the Company began incorporating the net effect of the projected benefit obligation and the plan assets of its defined benefit plan in the Netherlands in its Consolidated Balance Sheets. In prior years, the Company could not obtain the necessary information to include the net impact of this plan on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. As a result, the benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets at the beginning of year have been restated. The net effect of recording the benefit obligation in excess of plan assets of this plan to the Consolidated Statements of Income and the Consolidated Balance Sheets was not material for both fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005.

The underfunded status of the plan of $6.8 million at December 29, 2006 is recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as a short-term and long-term accrued pension liability. No plan assets are expected to be returned to Trimble during the fiscal year-ended December 28, 2007.

Net periodic benefit costs in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004 were not material.

Actuarial assumptions used to determine the net periodic pension costs for the year ended December 29, 2006 were as follows:

 
Swedish Subsidiary
German Subsidiaries
Netherlands Subsidiary
Discount rate
4.5%
4.3%
4.0%
Rate of compensation increase
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
Measurement Date
12/29/06
12/29/06
12/29/06

Trimble’s accumulated benefits obligation was $7.5 million and $7.0 million for fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Trimble’s plan assets are primarily located in our German subsidiaries and the Netherlands subsidiary. For German subsidiaries, for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, the asset allocation of our total plan assets was approximately as follows: 89% local government bonds, 7% real estate and 4% equity securities. Long-term asset allocation and expected return on assets assumptions are derived from detailed annual studies conducted by Trimble’s asset management group and actuaries. Trimble’s asset management group limits allocation to equity securities and real estate to a maximum of 10% and 25%, respectively, with the remaining assets to be allocated to local government bonds. For the Netherlands subsidiary, 100% of the assets are invested in an insurance contract. While the asset allocation give appropriate consideration to recent performance and historical returns, the strategy is focused primarily on conservative and sustainable long-term returns. Based on historical returns, Trimble expects future return on assets to be approximately 4%.

Trimble expects to contribute approximately $500,000 to plan assets in fiscal year ended 2007.

The following benefit payments, which reflect estimated future employee service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

   
Expected Benefit Payments
  
(In thousands)
      
       
2007
  
$
320
  
2008
 
$
380
  
2009
  
$
461
  
2010
  
$
529
  
2011
  
$
558
  
2012-2016
  
$
3,040
  
Total
  
$
5,288
  



NOTE 16: STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW DATA

Fiscal Years Ended
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2004
  
(in thousands)
              
               
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
              
Interest paid
  
$
8
  
$
1,081
  
$
3,142
  
Income taxes paid
  
$
36,000
  
$
8,938
  
$
6,694
  
                     
Significant non-cash investing activities:
                    
Issuance of shares related to acquisition related earn-out payments
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
$
1,798
  


NOTE 17: LITIGATION

From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation arising out of the ordinary course of its business. There are no known claims or pending litigation expected to have a material effect on the Company’s overall financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.


NOTE 18: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Acquisition of @Road, Inc.

On February 16, 2007, we acquired @Road, Inc. of Fremont, California for a total purchase price of approximately $493.1 million. @Road, Inc. is a global provider of solutions designed to automate the management of mobile resources and to optimize the service delivery process for customers across a variety of industries. @Road will be reported within our Mobile Solutions business segment. This acquisition was the largest in acquisition value in the company’s history. It significantly increases our presence in the mobile resource management (MRM) market which Trimble believes is a large and fast growing market. With the addition of @Road, Trimble’s TMS segment will be better able to service larger customers, with a broader and more robust solution set.

Trimble elected to pay the $7.50 per share purchase consideration with $5.00 in cash and $2.50 in newly issued shares of Trimble common stock, payable to @Road stockholders. Pursuant to this election and the merger agreement, the stock portion of the merger consideration payable to @Road shareholders was 0.0447 shares of Trimble common stock per share of @Road common stock or a total of 2.9 million shares valued at $164.4 million.

Amended and Restated Credit Facilities

On February 16, 2007, the Company amended and restated its existing $200 million unsecured revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of 11 banks with The Bank of Nova Scotia as the administrative agent (the “2007 Credit Facility”). Under the 2007 Credit Facility, the Company exercised the accordion option in the existing credit agreement to increase the availability under the revolving credit line by $100,000,000, for an aggregate availability of up to $300,000,000, and extended the maturity date of the revolving credit line by 18 months, from July 2010 to February 2012.  Up to $25 million of the availability under the revolving credit line may be used to issue letters of credit, and up to $20 million may be used for swing line loans. In addition, the Company incurred five-year term loan under the 2007 Credit Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $100,000,000, which will mature concurrently with the revolving credit line.  The term loan will be repaid in quarterly installments, with principal being amortized at the following annual rates: year 1 at 10%, year 2 at 15%, year 3 at 15%, year 4 at 20%, year 5 at 20%, and the last quarterly payment to be made at maturity, together with a final payment of 20%.  Under the existing facility, the Company was required to maintain a maximum leverage ratio of 2:75:1. The 2007 Credit Facility increased the maximum leverage ratio to 3.00:1.   The funds available under the new 2007 Credit Facility may be used by the Company for acquisitions and general corporate purposes.


As of February 20, 2007, the Company had $150 million drawn on the revolving credit line and $100 million in term loan outstanding. 

2-for-1 Stock Split

On January 17, 2007, Trimble’s Board of Directors approved a 2-for-1 split of all outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock, payable February 22, 2007 to stockholders of record on February 8, 2007. All shares and per share information presented has been adjusted to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis for all periods presented.


NOTE 19: SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

Fiscal period ended
  
March 31,
2006
  
June 30,
2006
  
September 29,
2006
  
December 29,
2006
  
(in thousands, except per share data)
                  
                   
Revenue
  
$
225,854
  
$
245,326
  
$
234,851
  
$
234,120
  
Gross margin
    
107,463
    
121,656
    
116,191
    
115,771
  
Net income
   
25,828
    
28,503
    
25,342
    
23,983
  
                           
Basic net income per share
    
0.24
    
0.26
    
0.23
    
0.22
  
Diluted net income per share
    
0.23
    
0.25
    
0.22
    
0.21
  

Fiscal period ended
  
April 1,
2005
  
July 1,
2005
  
September 30,
2005
  
December 30,
2005
  
(in thousands, except per share data)
                  
Revenue
  
$
195,383
  
$
204,225
  
$
188,484
  
$
186,821
  
Gross margin
    
97,807
    
102,407
    
97,292
    
92,299
  
Net income
   
17,439
    
23,787
    
20,236
    
23,393
 
                           
Basic net income per share
    
0.17
    
0.23
    
0.19
    
0.22
  
Diluted net income per share
    
0.16
    
0.21
    
0.18
    
0.21
  

Trimble has a 52-53 week fiscal year, ending on the Friday nearest to December 31. As a result of the extra week, year-over-year results are not exactly comparable. Thus, due to the inherent nature of adopting a 52-53 week fiscal year, the Company, analysts, shareholders, investors, and others will have to make appropriate adjustments to any analysis performed when comparing our activities and results.

Significant quarterly items for fiscal 2006 include the following: (i) in the first quarter of 2006 a $2.6 million benefit, or a $0.03 per diluted share resulting from the settlement of foreign income tax audits; (ii) in the second quarter of 2006 a $1.0 million charge, or $0.00 per diluted share relating to in-process research and development and a $2.2 million benefit, or a $0.02 per diluted share resulting from the settlement of foreign income tax audits; (iii) in the third quarter a $1.7 million benefit, or a $0.02 per diluted share resulting from the amendment of a federal income tax return; (iv) in the fourth quarter of 2006 a $930,000 charge, or $0.00 per diluted share relating to in-process research and development and $1.8 million benefit, or a $0.02 per diluted share resulting from the settlement of foreign income tax audits.

Significant quarterly items for fiscal 2005 include the following: (i) in the first quarter of 2005 a $0.2 million charge, or less than $0.01 per diluted share relating to facilities closure; (ii) in the third quarter of 2005 a $0.9 million charge, or $0.02 per diluted share relating to a write-off of debt issuance costs; (iii) in the fourth quarter of 2005 a $1.1 million charge, or $0.02 per diluted share relating to in-process research and development and $9.2 million or $0.16 per diluted share related to deferred gain on joint venture.


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Trimble Navigation Limited

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Trimble Navigation Limited as of December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholder’s equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 29, 2006. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Trimble Navigation Limited at December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 29, 2006, in conformity with U.S generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, in fiscal 2006 the Company changed its method of accounting for stock based compensation in accordance with guidance provided in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Trimble Navigation Limited’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 22, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
San Jose, California
February 22, 2007

 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Trimble Navigation Limited


We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting at Item 9A, that Trimble Navigation Limited maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Trimble Navigation Limited’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Trimble Navigation Limited maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Trimble Navigation Limited maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Trimble Navigation Limited as of December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 29, 2006, of Trimble Navigation Limited and our report dated February 22, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
San Jose, California
February 22, 2007


Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None 

Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures.

 
(3)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Trimble’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), after evaluating the effectiveness of the company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)), as of December 29, 2006, have concluded that as of December 29, 2006, the company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective and designed to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to the company and its consolidated subsidiaries required to be included in the company’s periodic filings under the Exchange Act would be made known to them by others within those entities.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
 
The company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the results of this evaluation, the company’s management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 29, 2006.

Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2006 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included elsewhere herein.
 
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended December 29, 2006, there were no changes in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.
Other Information.

None.


PART III


Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The information required by this item, insofar as it relates to Trimble’s directors, will be contained under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. The information required by this item relating to executive officers is set forth above in Item 1 Business Overview under the caption “Executive Officers.”

Code of Ethics

The Company’s Business Ethics and Conduct Policy applies to, among others, to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller, and other finance organization employees. The Business Ethics and Conduct Policy is available on the Company’s website at www.trimble.com under the heading “Corporate Governance and Policies” on the Investor Information page of our website. A copy will be provided, without charge, to any shareholder who requests one by written request addressed to General Counsel, Trimble Navigation Limited, 935 Stewart Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94085.

If any substantive amendments to the Business Ethics and Conduct Policy are made or any waivers are granted, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the Business Ethics and Conduct Policy, to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Corporate Controller, the Company will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on the Company’s website at www.trimble.com or in a report on Form 8-K.
 
Item 11.
Executive Compensation.

The information required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Executive Compensation” and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The information required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The information required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Principal Accounting Fees and Services” and is incorporated herein by reference.


PART IV

Item 15.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)
(1)  Financial Statements

The following consolidated financial statements required by this item are included in Part II Item 8 hereof under the caption “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
 
 
Page in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005
42
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 29, 2006
43
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 29, 2006
44
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 29, 2006
45
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
46
 
 
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
74

 
(4)
Financial Statement Schedules

The following financial statement schedule is filed as part of this report:
 
 
Page in this Annual
 Report on Form 10-K
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
S-1

All other schedules have been omitted as they are either not required or not applicable, or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

 
(5)
Exhibits

Exhibit
Number

2.1
  
Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among Trimble Navigation Limited, Roadrunner Acquisition Corp. and @Road, Inc., dated as of December 10, 2006. (27)
2.2
  
Form of Voting Agreement, by and among Trimble Navigation Limited and certain stockholders of @Road, Inc., dated as of December 10, 2006. (28)
3.1
  
Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed June 25, 1986. (5)
3.2
  
Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed October 6, 1988. (6)
3.3
  
Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed July 18, 1990. (7)
3.4
  
Certificate of Determination of the Company filed February 19, 1999. (8)
3.5
  
Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed May 29, 2003. (15)
3.6
  
Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed March 4, 2004. (19)
3.7
  
Bylaws of the Company (amended and restated through July 20, 2006). (18)
4.1
  
Specimen copy of certificate for shares of Common Stock of the Company. (1)
4.2
  
Preferred Shares Rights Agreement dated as of February 18, 1999. (4)
4.3
  
Agreement of Substitution and Amendment of Preferred Shares Rights Agreement dated September 10, 2004. (20)
 
 
4.4
  
Form of Warrant dated April 12, 2002. (13)
10.1+
  
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and its officers and directors. (26)
10. 2+
  
1990 Director Stock Option Plan, as amended, and form of Outside Director Non-statutory Stock Option Agreement. (3)
10.3+
  
1992 Management Discount Stock Option and form of Non-statutory Stock Option Agreement. (2)
10.4+
  
1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended October 24, 2003. (11)
10.5+
  
Trimble Navigation 1988 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended January 17, 2007. (31)
10.6+
  
Employment Agreement between the Company and Steven W. Berglund dated March 17, 1999. (9)
10.7+
  
Trimble Navigation Limited Deferred Compensation Plan effective December 30, 2004, as amended May 19, 2005. (10)
10.8+
  
Australian Addendum to the Trimble Navigation Limited 1988 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (12)
10.9+
 
Trimble Navigation Limited 2002 Stock Plan (as amended and restated October 20, 2006), including forms of option agreements. (32)
10.10
  
Credit Agreement dated July 28, 2005 among Trimble Navigation Limited, The Bank of Nova Scotia (Administrative Agent, Issuing Bank and Swing Line Bank), The Bank of New York and Harris Nesbitt (Co-Syndication Agents), Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (Co-Documentation Agents), The Bank of Nova Scotia and BNY Capital Markets, Inc. (Joint Lead Arrangers), and The Bank of Nova Scotia (Sole Book Runner). (14)
10.11+
  
Employment Agreement between the Company and Rajat Bahri dated December 6, 2004. (21)
10.12+
  
Board of Directors Compensation Policy effective January 1, 2004. (22)
10.13+
  
Form of Change in Control severance agreement between the Company and certain Company officers. (16)
10.14+
  
Letter of Assignment between the Company and Alan Townsend dated November 12, 2003. (23)
10.15+
  
Supplemental agreement to Letter of Assignment between the Company and Alan Townsend dated January 19, 2004. (24)
10.16+
  
Trimble Navigation Limited 2006 Management Incentive Plan Description. (25)
10.17
  
Lease dated May 11, 2005 between CarrAmerica Realty Operating Partnership, L.P. and the Company. (30)
10.18+
  
Trimble Navigation Limited 2007 Management Incentive Plan Description. (29)
10.19+
  
@Road, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan. (31)
21.1
  
Subsidiaries of the Company. (31)
23.1
  
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. (31)
24.1
  
Power of Attorney included on signature page herein.
31.1
  
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (31)
31.2
  
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (31)
32.1
  
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (31)
32.2
  
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (31)
 
  
 
+
  
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 14I thereof.
(1)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 33-35333), which became effective July 19, 1990.
(2)
  
Incorporated by reference exhibit number 10.46 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-45990), which was filed February 25, 1992.
(3)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.32 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993.
(4)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A, which was filed on February 18, 1999.
(5)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 1999.
(6)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 1999.
(7)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 1999.
(8)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 1999.
(9)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.67 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 1999.
(10)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 25, 2005.
 
 
(11)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2003.
(12)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.77 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2000.
(13)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on April 19, 2002.
(14)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.
(15)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2003.
(16)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.15 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(18)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2006.
(19)
 
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2004.
(20)
 
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 4.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(21)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.13 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(22)
 
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(23)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.16 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(24)
 
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(25)
 
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2006.
(26)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 20, 3005.
(27)   Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 11, 2006.
(28)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 2.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 11, 2006.
(29)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2006.
(30)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2005.
(31)
  
Filed herewith.
 

EXHIBIT LIST

Exhibit
Number
 
2.1
  
Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among Trimble Navigation Limited, Roadrunner Acquisition Corp. and @Road, Inc., dated as of December 10, 2006. (27)
2.2
  
Form of Voting Agreement, by and among Trimble Navigation Limited and certain stockholders of @Road, Inc., dated as of December 10, 2006. (28)
3.1
  
Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed June 25, 1986. (5)
3.2
  
Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed October 6, 1988. (6)
3.3
  
Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed July 18, 1990. (7)
3.4
  
Certificate of Determination of the Company filed February 19, 1999. (8)
3.5
  
Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed May 29, 2003. (15)
3.6
  
Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed March 4, 2004. (19)
3.7
  
Bylaws of the Company (amended and restated through July 20, 2006). (18)
4.1
  
Specimen copy of certificate for shares of Common Stock of the Company. (1)
4.2
  
Preferred Shares Rights Agreement dated as of February 18, 1999. (4)
4.3
  
Agreement of Substitution and Amendment of Preferred Shares Rights Agreement dated September 10, 2004. (20)
4.4
  
Form of Warrant dated April 12, 2002. (13)
10.1+
  
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and its officers and directors. (26)
10. 2+
  
1990 Director Stock Option Plan, as amended, and form of Outside Director Non-statutory Stock Option Agreement. (3)
10.3+
  
1992 Management Discount Stock Option and form of Non-statutory Stock Option Agreement. (2)
10.4+
  
1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended October 24, 2003. (11)
 
Trimble Navigation 1988 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended January 17, 2007. (31)
10.6+
  
Employment Agreement between the Company and Steven W. Berglund dated March 17, 1999. (9)
10.7+
  
Trimble Navigation Limited Deferred Compensation Plan effective December 30, 2004, as amended May 19, 2005. (10)
10.8+
  
Australian Addendum to the Trimble Navigation Limited 1988 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (12)
 
Trimble Navigation Limited 2002 Stock Plan (as amended and restated October 20, 2006), including forms of option agreements. (32)
10.10
  
Credit Agreement dated July 28, 2005 among Trimble Navigation Limited, The Bank of Nova Scotia (Administrative Agent, Issuing Bank and Swing Line Bank), The Bank of New York and Harris Nesbitt (Co-Syndication Agents), Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (Co-Documentation Agents), The Bank of Nova Scotia and BNY Capital Markets, Inc. (Joint Lead Arrangers), and The Bank of Nova Scotia (Sole Book Runner). (14)
10.11+
  
Employment Agreement between the Company and Rajat Bahri dated December 6, 2004. (21)
10.12+
  
Board of Directors Compensation Policy effective January 1, 2004. (22)
10.13+
  
Form of Change in Control severance agreement between the Company and certain Company officers. (16)
10.14+
  
Letter of Assignment between the Company and Alan Townsend dated November 12, 2003. (23)
10.15+
  
Supplemental agreement to Letter of Assignment between the Company and Alan Townsend dated January 19, 2004. (24)
10.16+
  
Trimble Navigation Limited 2006 Management Incentive Plan Description. (25)
10.17
  
Lease dated May 11, 2005 between CarrAmerica Realty Operating Partnership, L.P. and the Company. (30)
10.18+
  
Trimble Navigation Limited 2007 Management Incentive Plan Description. (29)
 
@Road, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan. (31)
 
Subsidiaries of the Company. (31)
 
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. (31)
24.1
  
Power of Attorney included on signature page herein.
 
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (31)
 
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (31)
 
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (31)
 
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (31)
 
 
+
  
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 14I thereof.
(1)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 33-35333), which became effective July 19, 1990.
(2)
  
Incorporated by reference exhibit number 10.46 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-45990), which was filed February 25, 1992.
(3)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.32 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993.
(4)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A, which was filed on February 18, 1999.
(5)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 1999.
(6)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 1999.
(7)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 1999.
(8)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 1999.
(9)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.67 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 1999.
(10)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 25, 2005.
(11)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2003.
(12)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.77 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2000.
(13)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on April 19, 2002.
(14)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.
(15)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2003.
(16)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.15 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(18)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2006.
(19)
 
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2004.
(20)
 
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 4.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(21)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.13 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(22)
 
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(23)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.16 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(24)
 
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
(25)
 
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2006.
(26)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 20, 3005.
(27)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 11, 2006.
(28)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 2.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 11, 2006.
(29)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2006.
(30)
  
Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2005.
(31)
  
Filed herewith.
 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
TRIMBLE NAVIGATION LIMITED
 
By: /s/ Steven W. Berglund
Steven W. Berglund,
President and Chief Executive Officer

 February 23, 2007

 
POWER OF ATTORNEY

Know all persons by these presents, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Steven W. Berglund as his attorney-in-fact, with the power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature
  
Capacity in which Signed
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
/s/ Steven W. Berglund
 
President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
  
February 21, 2007
Steven W. Berglund
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
/s/ Rajat Bahri
 
Chief Financial Officer and Assistant
  
February 23, 2007
Rajat Bahri
  
Secretary (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
/s/ Robert S. Cooper
 
Director
  
February 22, 2007
Robert S. Cooper
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
/s/ John B. Goodrich  
  
Director
  
February 21, 2007
John B. Goodrich
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
/s/ William Hart
 
Director
  
February 22, 2007
William Hart
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
/s/ Ulf J. Johansson
 
Director
  
February 20, 2007
Ulf J. Johansson
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
/s/ Bradford W. Parkinson
 
Director
  
February 20, 2007
Bradford W. Parkinson
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
/s/ Nickolas W. Vande Steeg
 
Director
  
February 22, 2007
Nickolas W. Vande Steeg
  
 
    
 
84
 
SCHEDULE II

TRIMBLE NAVIGATION LIMITED
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)

 
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
  
December 29,
2006
  
December 30,
2005
  
December 31,
2005
  
Balance at beginning of period
  
$
5,230
  
$
8,952
  
$
9,953
  
Acquired allowance
    
494
    
237
    
116
  
Bad debt expense
    
163
    
502
    
1,210
  
Write-offs, net of recoveries
    
(1,824
)
  
(3,459
)
  
(2,327
)
Balance at end of period
  
$
4,063
  
$
5,230
  
$
8,952
  
                     
Inventory allowance:
                    
Balance at beginning of period
  
$
23,238
  
$
26,217
  
$
25,885
  
Acquired allowance
    
1
    
357
    
591
  
Additions to allowance
    
7,061
    
5,612
    
3,765
  
Write-offs, net of recoveries
    
(1,718
)
  
(8,948
)
  
(4,024
)
Balance at end of period
  
$
28,582
  
$
23,238
  
$
26,217
  
                     
Sales return reserve:
                    
Balance at beginning of period
  
$
1,500
  
$
2,210
  
$
3,252
  
Acquired allowance
    
55
    
21
    
-
  
Additions (Reductions) to allowance
    
(586
)
  
(383
)
  
(809
)
Write-offs, net of recoveries
    
(110
)
  
(348
)
  
(233
)
Balance at end of period
  
$
859
  
$
1,500
  
$
2,210
  
 

S-1