AS FILED WITH THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON JUNE 22, 2006
REGISTRATION NO. 333-133048

UNITED STATES SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

Amendment No. 2 to FORM SB-2
On
FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
4731
04-3625550
  
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(primary standard industrial
classification code number)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
  

1227 120th Avenue N.E
Bellevue, WA 98005
(425) 943-4599
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,
of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

Bohn H. Crain
Chief Executive Officer
Radiant Logistics, Inc.
1227 120th Avenue N.E.
Bellevue, WA 98005
(425) 943-4599
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

Copies to:

Stephen M. Cohen, Esq.
General Counsel
1835 Market Street, Suite 1500
Philadelphia, PA 19103
(215) 568-4891

Vincent A. Vietti
Fox Rothschild, LLP
Princeton Pike Corporate Center
997 Lenox Drive, Building 3


Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311
(609) 896-4571
 
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.  x

If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462I under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier registration statement for the same offering. o

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
 
Title of each class of
  securities to be
     registered
 
Amount to be
registered(1) 
  
 Proposed maximum
offering price per
     share(2) 
  
 Proposed maximum
aggregate offering
       price
 
Amount of
registration fee
Common stock, par value
$0.001 per share
 
14,847,461(3)
 
$1.00
  
$14,847,461
 
$1,596(4) 
 
(1)
In accordance with Rule 416(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant is also registering hereunder an indeterminate number of additional shares that may be issued upon stock splits, stock dividends or similar transactions.
 
(2)
Estimated in accordance with Rule 457(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 solely for the purpose of computing the amount of the registration fee based on the average of the bid and asked price per share of the registrant’s common stock reported on the OTC Bulletin Board on April 3, 2006.
 
(3)
Represents shares of the registrant’s common stock being registered for resale that have been issued to the selling shareholders named in this registration statement.
 
(4)
Previously paid.
 
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said section 8(a), may determine.


The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. The selling shareholders may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED June 22, 2006

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.

14,847,461 shares of common stock

The 14,847,461 shares of our common stock, $0.001 par value per share, are being offered by the selling shareholders identified in this prospectus. All of the shares were previously issued by us in private placement transactions.

We are not selling any shares of our common stock in this offering and, therefore, will not receive any proceeds from this offering. We will bear all costs associated with this registration. The selling shareholders may offer the shares covered by this prospectus at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, at varying prices or negotiated prices, in negotiated transactions, or in trading markets for our common stock.

Our common stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “RLGT.OB” The closing price of our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board on June 19, 2006, was $1.05 per share.

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 3 of this prospectus.
 
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved these securities or determined that this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
 
The date of this prospectus is June ___, 2006.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 1
 
 3
 
 9
 
10
 
10
 
11
 
16
 
35
 
42
 
42
 
43
 
44
 
48
 
49
 
50
 
50
 
52
 
54
 
57
 
57
 
57
 
58
 
58
 
F-1
 
II-1
 
 
YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THIS PROSPECTUS. WE HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH DIFFERENT INFORMATION. WE ARE NOT MAKING AN OFFER OF THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER IS NOT PERMITTED. YOU SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS ACCURATE AS OF ANY DATE OTHER THAN THE DATE ON THE FRONT OF THIS PROSPECTUS.
 


PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. It is not complete and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. To understand this offering fully, you should read the entire prospectus carefully. Investors should carefully consider the information set forth under the heading “Risk Factors.” In this prospectus, the terms “the Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Radiant Logistics, Inc.

Our Company

We are a non-asset based supply chain management company. We offer domestic and international air, ocean and ground freight forwarding for shipments. Our primary operations involve obtaining shipment or material orders from customers, creating and delivering a wide range of logistics solutions to meet customers’ specific requirements for transportation and related services, and arranging and monitoring all aspects of material flow activity utilizing advanced information technology systems. Our principal source of income is derived from freight forwarding services. As a freight forwarder, we arrange for the shipment of our customers’ freight from point of origin to point of destination. Generally, we quote our customers a turn key cost for the movement of their freight. In turn, we assume the responsibility for arranging and paying for the underlying means of transportation.

As a non-asset based provider of third-party logistics services, we seek to limit our investment in equipment, facilities and working capital through contracts and preferred provider arrangements with various transportation providers who generally provide us with favorable rates, minimum service levels, capacity assurances and priority handling status. Our non-asset based approach is designed to allow us to maintain a high level of operating flexibility and leverage a cost structure that is highly variable in nature while the volume of our flow of freight enables us to negotiate attractive pricing with our transportation providers.

Our Strategy

Through the strategic acquisition of regional best-of-breed non-asset based transportation and logistics service providers, we intend to build a leading global transportation and supply-chain management company offering a full range of domestic and international freight forwarding and other value added supply chain management services, including order fulfillment, inventory management and warehousing.

Our strategy has been designed to take advantage of shifting market dynamics. The third party logistics industry continues to grow as an increasing number of businesses outsource their logistics functions to more cost effectively manage and extract value from their supply chains. We believe the industry is positioned for further consolidation as it remains highly fragmented, and as customers continue to demand the types of sophisticated and broad reaching service offerings that can more effectively be handled by larger more diverse organizations.

Our strategy relies upon two primary factors: first, our ability to identify and acquire target businesses that fit within our general acquisition criteria and, second, the continued availability of capital and financing resources sufficient to complete these acquisitions. As to our first factor, effective January 1 2006, we acquired Airgroup Corporation (“Airgroup”), a non-asset based logistics company located in the Seattle, Washington area. Airgroup provides domestic and international freight forwarding services through a network of 34 exclusive agent offices across North America. It services a diversified account base including manufacturers, distributors and retailers using a network of independent carriers and over 100 international agents positioned strategically around the world. We have also identified a number of additional companies that may be suitable acquisition candidates and are in preliminary discussions with a select number of them. As to our second factor, our ability to secure additional financing will rely upon the sale of debt or equity securities, and the development of an active trading market for our securities, neither of which can be assured.


Our strategy also relies upon our ability to efficiently integrate the businesses of the companies we acquire, generate the anticipated economies of scale from the integration, and maintain the historic sales growth of the acquired businesses in order to generate continued organic growth.
 
There are a variety of risks associated with our ability to achieve our strategic objectives, including our ability to finance and locate candidates for acquisition, to profitably manage additional businesses, once acquired, and to compete in our industry for customers and for the acquisition of additional businesses. The business risks associated with these factors are identified or referred to later in this prospectus.
 
Background
 
We were formed under the laws of the state of Delaware on March 15, 2001 as “Golf Two, Inc.” From inception through the third quarter of 2005, our principal business strategy focused on the development of retail golf stores. In October 2005, our management team consisting of Bohn H. Crain and Stephen M. Cohen, completed a change of control transaction when they acquired a majority of the Company’s outstanding securities from the Company’s former officers and directors in privately negotiated transactions. In conjunction with the change of control transaction, we: (i) elected to discontinue the Company’s former business model; (ii) repositioned ourselves as a global transportation and supply chain management company; and (iii) changed our name to “Radiant Logistics, Inc.” to, among other things, better align our name with our new business focus.
 
Our principal executive offices are located at 1227 120th Avenue N.E., Bellevue, WA 98005, and our telephone number is (425) 943-4599. We maintain a web site at www.radiant-logistics.com. Information contained on our web site does not constitute part of this prospectus.

The Offering

Common stock outstanding:
  
33,611,639 shares as of June 19, 2006
 
Common stock that may be offered by selling shareholders:
  
 
Up to 14,847,461 shares that were previously issued to the selling shareholders in private placement transactions. This prospectus includes 7,243,182 shares being offered by certain of our principal shareholders and 113,637 shares offered by one of our executive officers.
 
Total  proceeds raised by offering:
  
 
We will not receive any proceeds from the resale or other disposition of the shares covered by this prospectus by any selling shareholder.
 
Risk factors:
  
 
There are significant risks involved in investing in our Company. For a discussion of risk factors you should consider before buying our common stock, see “Risk Factors” beginning on page 3. 

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors in addition to other information in this prospectus before purchasing our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below are those that we currently deem to be material and that we believe are specific to our company and our industry. In addition to these risks, our business may be subject to risks currently unknown to us. If any of these or other risks actually occurs, our business may be adversely affected, the trading price of our common stock may decline and you may lose all or part of your investment.
 
RISKS PARTICULAR TO OUR BUSINESS

We are implementing a new business plan.

We have recently discontinued our former business model involving the development of retail golf stores, and adopted a new model involving the development of non-asset based third-party logistics services. We have only recently completed our platform acquisition under our new business model. As a result, we have a very limited operating history under our current business model. Even though we are being managed by senior executives with significant experience in the industry, our limited operating history makes it difficult to predict trends that may affect our business and the longer-term success of our business model.

Our present levels of capital may limit the implementation of our business strategy.

The objective of our business strategy is to build a global logistics services organization. Critical to this strategy is an aggressive acquisition program which will require the acquisition of a number of diverse companies within the logistics industry covering a variety of geographic regions and specialized service offerings. As a result of our recently completed acquisition of Airgroup, we have a limited amount of cash resources and our ability to make additional acquisitions without securing additional financing from outside sources will be limited. This may limit or slow our ability to achieve the critical mass we need to achieve our strategic objectives.

Risks related to acquisition financing.

In order to pursue our acquisition strategy in the longer term, we will require additional financing. We intend to obtain such financing through a combination of traditional debt financing or the placement of debt and equity securities. We may finance some portion of our future acquisitions by either issuing equity or by using shares of our common stock for all or a substantial portion of the purchase price for such businesses. In the event that our common stock does not attain or maintain a sufficient market value, or potential acquisition candidates are otherwise unwilling to accept common stock as part of the purchase price for the sale of their businesses, we may be required to utilize more of our cash resources, if available, in order to maintain our acquisition program. If we do not have sufficient cash resources, we will not be able to complete acquisitions and our growth could be limited unless we are able to obtain additional capital through debt or equity financings.
 
We have used a significant amount of our available capital to finance the acquisition of Airgroup. 
 
We expect to structure our acquisitions with certain amounts paid at closing, and the balance paid over a number of years in the form of earn-out installments which would be payable based upon the future earnings of the acquired businesses payable in cash, Company stock or some combination thereof. As we execute our acquisition strategy, we expect that we will be required to make significant payments in the future if the earn-out installments under prospective acquisitions become due. While we believe that a portion of any required cash payments will be generated by the acquired businesses, we may have to secure additional sources of capital to fund the remainder of any cash-based earn-out payments as they become due. This presents us with certain business risks relative to the availability of capacity under our existing credit facility, the availability and pricing of future fund raising, as well as the potential dilution to our stockholders to the extent the earn-outs are satisfied directly, or indirectly from the sale of equity.


Our credit facility places certain limits on the type and number of acquisitions we may make.

We have obtained a $10 million credit facility from Bank of America, N.A. to provide additional funding for acquisitions and for our on-going working capital requirements. Under the terms of the credit facility, we are subject to a number of financial and operational covenants which may limit the number of additional acquisitions we make without the lender’s consent. In the event that we were not able to satisfy the conditions of the credit facility in connection with a proposed acquisition, we would have to forego the acquisition unless we either obtained the lender’s consent or retired the credit facility. This may prevent us from completing acquisitions which we determine are desirable from a business perspective and limit or slow our ability to achieve the critical mass we need to achieve our strategic objectives.

Our credit facility contains financial covenants that may limit its current availability.

The terms of our credit facility are subject to certain financial covenants which may limit the amount otherwise available under that facility. Principal among these are financial covenants that limit funded debt to a multiple of our consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or “EBITDA”. Under this covenant, our funded debt is limited to a multiple of 3.25 of our EBITDA measured on a rolling four quarter basis. Our ability to generate EBITDA will be critical to our ability to use the full amount of the credit facility.

Due to our acquisition strategy, our earnings will be adversely affected by non-cash charges relating to the amortization of intangibles which may cause our stock price to decline .

Under applicable accounting standards, purchasers are required to allocate the total consideration paid in a business combination to the identified acquired assets and liabilities based on their fair values at the time of acquisition. The excess of the consideration paid to acquire a business over the fair value of the identifiable tangible assets acquired must be allocated among identifiable intangible assets and goodwill. The amount allocated to goodwill is not subject to amortization. However, it is tested at least annually for impairment. The amount allocated to identifiable intangibles, such as customer relationships and the like, is amortized over the life of these intangible assets. We expect that this will subject us to periodic charges against our earnings to the extent of the amortization incurred for that period. Because our business strategy focuses on growth through acquisitions, our future earnings will be subject to greater non-cash amortization charges than a company whose earnings are derived organically. As a result, we will experience an increase in non-cash charges related to the amortization of intangible assets acquired in our acquisitions. This will create the appearance, based on our financial statements, that our intangible assets are diminishing in value, when in fact they may be increasing because we are growing the value of our intangible assets (e.g. customer relationships). Because of this discrepancy, we believe our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, otherwise known as “EBITDA”, a non GAAP measure of financial performance, provides a meaningful measure of our financial performance. However, the investment community generally measures a public company’s performance by its net income. Thus, while we believe EBITDA provides a meaningful measure of our financial performance, should the investment community elect to place more emphasis on our net income, the future price of our common stock could be adversely affected.


We are not obligated to follow any particular criteria or standards for identifying acquisition candidates.

Even though we have developed general acquisition guidelines, we are not obligated to follow any particular operating, financial, geographic or other criteria in evaluating candidates for potential acquisitions or business combinations. We will target companies which we believe will provide the best potential long-term financial return for our stockholders and we will determine the purchase price and other terms and conditions of acquisitions. Our stockholders will not have the opportunity to evaluate the relevant economic, financial and other information that our management team will use and consider in deciding whether or not to enter into a particular transaction.
 
There is a scarcity of and competition for acquisition opportunities.
 
There are a limited number of operating companies available for acquisition which we deem to be desirable targets. In addition, there is a very high level of competition among companies seeking to acquire these operating companies. We are and will continue to be a very minor participant in the business of seeking acquisitions of these types of companies. A large number of established and well-financed entities are active in acquiring interests in companies which we may find to be desirable acquisition candidates. Many of these entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than us. Consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in negotiating and executing possible acquisitions of these businesses. Even if we are able to successfully compete with these entities, this competition may affect the terms of completed transactions and, as a result, we may pay more than we expected for potential acquisitions. We may not be able to identify operating companies that complement our strategy, and even if we identify a company that complements our strategy, we may be unable to complete an acquisition of such a company for many reasons, including:
 
·
a failure to agree on the terms necessary for a transaction, such as the amount of the purchase price;
·
incompatibility between our operational strategies and management philosophies and those of the potential acquiree;
·
competition from other acquirers of operating companies;
·
a lack of sufficient capital to acquire a profitable logistics company; and
·
the unwillingness of a potential acquiree to work with our management.

If we are unable to successfully compete with other entities in identifying and executing possible acquisitions of companies we target, then we will not be able to successfully implement our business plan.

We may be required to incur a significant amount of indebtedness in order to successfully implement our acquisition strategy.

We may be required to incur a significant amount of indebtedness in order to complete future acquisitions. If we are not able to generate sufficient cash flow from the operations of acquired companies to make scheduled payments of principal and interest on the indebtedness, then we will be required to use our capital for such payments. This will restrict our ability to make additional acquisitions. We may also be forced to sell an acquired company in order to satisfy indebtedness. We cannot be certain that we will be able to operate profitably once we incur this indebtedness or that we will be able to generate a sufficient amount of proceeds from the ultimate disposition of such acquired companies to repay the indebtedness incurred to make these acquisitions.


Risks related to our acquisition strategy.

We intend to continue to build our business through a combination of organic growth, and to a greater extent, through additional acquisitions. Growth by acquisitions involve a number of risks, including possible adverse effects on our operating results, diversion of management resources, failure to retain key personnel, and risks associated with unanticipated liabilities, some or all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Dependence on key personnel.

For the foreseeable future our success will depend largely on the continued services of our Chief Executive Officer, Bohn H. Crain, as well as certain of the other key executives of Airgroup, because of their collective industry knowledge, marketing skills and relationships with major vendors and customers. We have secured employment arrangements with each of these individuals, which contain non-competition covenants which survives their actual term of employment. Nevertheless, should any of these individuals leave the Company, it could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations.

We may experience difficulties in integrating the operations, personnel and assets of companies that we acquire which may disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value and adversely affect our operating results.

A core component of our business plan is to acquire businesses and assets in the transportation and logistics industry. We have only made one such acquisition and, therefore, our ability to complete such acquisitions and integrate any acquired businesses into our Company is unproven. Increased competition for acquisition candidates may develop, in which event there may be fewer acquisition opportunities available to us as well as higher acquisition prices. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify, acquire or profitably manage businesses or successfully integrate acquired businesses into the Company without substantial costs, delays or other operational or financial problems. Such acquisitions also involve numerous operational risks, including:

·
difficulties in integrating operations, technologies, services and personnel;
·
the diversion of financial and management resources from existing operations;
·
the risk of entering new markets;
·
the potential loss of key employees; and
·
the inability to generate sufficient revenue to offset acquisition or investment costs.

As a result, if we fail to properly evaluate and execute any acquisitions or investments, our business and prospects may be seriously harmed.

We are largely dependent on the efforts of our exclusive agents to generate our revenue and service our customers.

We currently sell principally all of our services through a network of 34 exclusive agents stationed throughout the United States. Although we have exclusive and long-term relationships with these agents, the agency agreements are terminable by either party on 10-day’s notice. Although we have no customers that account for more than 5% of our revenues, there are five agency locations that each account for more than 5% of our revenues. The loss of one or more of these exclusive agents could negatively impact our ability to retain and service our customers. We will need to expand our existing relationships and enter into new relationships in order to increase our current and future market share and revenue. We cannot be certain that we will be able to maintain and expand our existing relationships or enter into new relationships, or that any new relationships will be available on commercially reasonable terms. If we are unable to maintain and expand our existing relationships or enter into new relationships, we may lose customers, customer introductions and co-marketing benefits and our operating results may suffer.


We face intense competition in the freight forwarding, logistics and supply chain management industry.

The freight forwarding, logistics and supply chain management industry is intensely competitive and is expected to remain so for the foreseeable future. We face competition from a number of companies, including many that have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources. There are a large number of companies competing in one or more segments of the industry, although the number of firms with a global network that offer a full complement of freight forwarding and supply chain management services is more limited. Depending on the location of the customer and the scope of services requested, we must compete against both the niche players and larger entities. In addition, customers increasingly are turning to competitive bidding situations involving bids from a number of competitors, including competitors that are larger than us.

Our industry is consolidating and if we cannot gain sufficient market presence in our industry, we may not be able to compete successfully against larger, global companies in our industry.

There currently is a marked trend within our industry toward consolidation of the niche players into larger companies which are attempting to increase global operations through the acquisition of regional and local freight forwarders. If we cannot gain sufficient market presence or otherwise establish a successful strategy in our industry, we may not be able to compete successfully against larger companies in our industry with global operations.

Provisions of our charter, bylaws and Delaware law may make a contested takeover of our Company more difficult.

Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”) could deter a change in our management or render more difficult an attempt to obtain control of us, even if such a proposal is favored by a majority of our stockholders. For example, we are subject to the provisions of the DGCL that prohibit a public Delaware corporation from engaging in a broad range of business combinations with a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns 15% or more of the corporation’s outstanding voting shares (an “interested stockholder”) for three years after the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. Our certificate of incorporation provides that directors may only be removed for cause by the affirmative vote of 75% of our outstanding shares and that amendments to our bylaws require the affirmative vote of holders of two-thirds of our outstanding shares. Our certificate of incorporation also includes undesignated preferred stock, which may enable our Board of Directors to discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a tender offer, proxy contest, merger or otherwise. Finally, our bylaws include an advance notice procedure for stockholders to nominate directors or submit proposals at a stockholders meeting.


RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

Trading in our common stock has been limited and there is no significant trading market for our common stock.

Our common stock is currently eligible to be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, however, trading to date has been limited. Trading on the OTC Bulletin Board is often characterized by low trading volume and significant price fluctuations. Because of this limited liquidity, stockholders may be unable to sell their shares. The trading price of our shares may from time to time fluctuate widely. The trading price may be affected by a number of factors including events described in the risk factors set forth in this Prospectus as well as our operating results, financial condition, announcements, general conditions in the industry, and other events or factors. In recent years, broad stock market indices, in general, and smaller capitalization companies, in particular, have experienced substantial price fluctuations. In a volatile market, we may experience wide fluctuations in the market price of our common stock. These fluctuations may have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.
 
The influx of additional shares of our common stock onto the market may create downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock.

We completed the private placement of approximately 15.4 million shares of our common stock between October 2005 and February 2006. This prospectus covers the public resale of 14,847,461 of these shares. The availability of a substantial number of additional shares for sale to the public and sale of such shares in the public markets, could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. Such an adverse effect on the market price would make it more difficult for us to sell our equity securities in the future at prices which we deem appropriate or to use our shares as currency for future acquisitions which will make it more difficult to execute our acquisition strategy.
 
Our acquisition strategy my result in additional dilution to our existing stockholders.

We will require additional financing to fund our acquisition strategy. At some point this may entail the issuance of additional shares of common stock or common stock equivalents, which would have the effect of further increasing the number of shares outstanding. In connection with future acquisitions, we may undertake the issuance of more shares of common stock without notice to our then existing stockholders. We may also issue additional shares in order to, among other things, compensate employees or consultants or for other valid business reasons in the discretion of our Board of Directors, and could result in diluting the interests of our existing stockholders.

We may issue shares of preferred stock with greater rights than our common stock.

Although we have no current plans or agreements to issue any preferred stock, our certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors to issue shares of preferred stock and to determine the price and other terms for those shares without the approval of our shareholders. Any such preferred stock we may issue in the future could rank ahead of our common stock, in terms of dividends, liquidation rights, and voting rights.
 
As we do not anticipate paying dividends, investors in our shares will not receive any dividend income.  

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our inception and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any dividends that we may pay in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our future earnings, any applicable regulatory considerations, covenants of our debt facility, our financial requirements and other similarly unpredictable factors. For the foreseeable future, we anticipate that we will retain any earnings which we may generate from our operations to finance and develop our growth and that we will not pay cash dividends to our stockholders. Accordingly, investors seeking dividend income should not purchase our stock.
 
 
We are not subject to certain of the corporate governance provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Since our common stock is not listed for trading on a national securities exchange, we are not subject to certain of the corporate governance requirements established by the national securities exchanges pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These include rules relating to independent directors, and independent director nomination, audit and compensation committees. Unless we voluntarily elect to comply with those obligations, investors in our shares will not have the protections offered by those corporate governance provisions. As of the date of this prospectus, we have not elected to comply with any regulations that do not apply to us. While we may make an application to have our securities listed for trading on a national securities exchange, which would require us to comply with those obligations, we can not assure that we will do so or that such application will be approved.
 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
This prospectus includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, regarding future operating performance, events, trends and plans. All statements other than statements of historical facts included or incorporated by reference in this prospectus, including, without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected revenues, projected costs and plans and objective of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” or “believes” or the negative thereof or any variation thereon or similar terminology or expressions. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations, projections and assumptions about future events. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that, if not realized, may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. While it is impossible to identify all of the factors that may cause our actual operating performance, events, trends or plans to differ materially from those set forth in such forward-looking statements, such factors include the inherent risks associated with: (i) our belief that Airgroup will be able to serve as a platform acquisition under our business strategy; (ii)  our ability to use Airgroup as a “platform” upon which we can build a profitable global transportation and supply chain management company, which itself relies upon securing significant additional funding, as to which we have no present assurances; (iii) our ability, on a long term basis, to at least maintain historical levels of transportation revenue, net transportation revenue (gross profit margins) and related operating expenses at Airgroup; (iv) competitive practices in the industries in which we compete, (v) our dependence on current management; (vi) the impact of current and future laws and governmental regulations affecting the transportation industry in general and our operations in particular; and (vii) other factors which may be identified from time to time in our Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and other public announcements. Furthermore, the general business assumptions used for purposes of the forward-looking statements included within this prospectus represent estimates of future events and are subject to uncertainty as to possible changes in economic, legislative, industry, and other circumstances. As a result, the identification and interpretation of data and other information and their use in developing and selecting assumptions from and among reasonable alternatives require the exercise of judgment. To the extent that the assumed events do not occur, the outcome may vary substantially from anticipated or projected results, and, accordingly, no opinion is expressed on the achievability of those forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly release the result of any revision of these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date they are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.


USE OF PROCEEDS
 
We will not receive any proceeds from sale of the shares of common stock covered by this prospectus by the selling shareholders.
 
MARKET FOR COMMON STOCK AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

Market Information

Our common stock currently trades on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “RLGT.OB.” The first reported trade in our common stock occurred on December 27, 2005. The following table states the range of the high and low bid-prices per share of our common stock for each of the calendar quarters since the first reported trade, as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board. These quotations represent inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown, or commission, and may not represent actual transactions. The last price of our common stock as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board on June 19, 2006, was $1.05 per share.

   
High
  
Low
  
 Year Ended December 31, 2005:
              
Quarter ended December 31, 2005
  
$
1.05
  
$
.95
  
               
 Year Ending December 31, 2006:
              
Quarter ended March 31, 2006
  
$
1.05
  
$
.95
  
               
Quarter ending June 30, 2006
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
(through May 31, 2006)
  
$
1.05
$
.85
  

Holders

As of June 19, 2006, the number of stockholders of record of our common stock was 89. We believe that there are additional beneficial owners of our common stock who hold their shares in street name.

Dividend Policy

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock to date, and we have no intention of paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Whether we declare and pay dividends will be determined by our board of directors at their discretion, subject to certain limitations imposed under Delaware law. The timing, amount and form of dividends, if any, will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. Our ability to pay dividends is limited by the terms of our Bank of America, N.A. credit facility.


Transfer Agent

We have retained Pacific Stock Transfer Company, 500 East Warm Springs, Suite 240, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119, as our transfer agent.
 
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
 
The following tables present portions of our financial statements and are not complete. You should read the following selected consolidated financial data together with our consolidated financial statements and related footnotes and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." The selected historical consolidated statement of operations and balance sheet data for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2005 are derived from our consolidated financial statements that have been audited by Stonefield Josephson, Inc.
 
From inception through the third quarter of 2005, our principal business strategy focused on the development of retail golf stores. In October 2005, our management team, consisting of Bohn H. Crain and Stephen M. Cohen, completed a change of control transaction when they acquired a majority of the Company’s outstanding securities from the Company’s former officers and directors in privately negotiated transactions. In conjunction with the change of control transaction, we: (i) elected to discontinue the Company’s former business model; (ii) repositioned ourselves as a global transportation and supply chain management company; and (iii) changed our name to “Radiant Logistics, Inc.” to, among other things, better align our name with our new business focus.
 
The selected financial data that appears below has been presented utilizing a combination of historical and, where relevant, pro forma information to include the effects on our consolidated financial statements of our recently completed: (i) equity offerings; and (ii) acquisition of Airgroup Corporation. Historical financial data has been supplemented, where appropriate, with pro forma financial data since historical data which merely reflects the prior period results of the Company on a stand-alone basis, would provide no meaningful data with respect to our ongoing operations since we were in the development stage prior to our acquisition of Airgroup. The pro forma information has been presented as if we had completed our equity offerings and acquired Airgroup as of January 1, 2005. The pro forma results are also adjusted to reflect a consolidation of the historical results of operations of Airgroup and Radiant as adjusted to reflect the amortization of acquired intangibles and are provided in the Financial Statements included within this prospectus. Similarly, pro forma statements of income have been presented for Airgroup’s fiscal years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 as if we had completed our equity offerings and acquired Airgroup as of July 1, 2003. The pro forma results are also adjusted to reflect a consolidation of the historical results of operations of Airgroup and the Company as adjusted to reflect the amortization of acquired intangibles and are also provided in the Financial Statements included within this prospectus.
 
The pro forma presentation for the interim period ended March 31, 2005 differs from the initial presentation provided in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 18, 2006 reporting the acquisition of Airgroup to: (1) increase our initial estimates for the amortization of acquired intangibles as a result of increased values attributable to the acquired intangibles, (2) reduce our estimate for interest expense associated with the acquisition financing because we incurred less debt to complete the acquisition than we had originally expected; and (3) exclude the impact of anticipated contractual reductions of officers’ and related family members’ compensation at Airgroup so that any such cost reductions could be more easily identified in our comparative analysis.
 
The pro forma financial data presented is not necessarily indicative of results of operations that would have occurred had this acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or that might be attained in the future.


Consolidated Statement of Operations Data for the interim periods ending March 31, 2006 and 2005 (historic and unaduited); (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
 
  
Historic
Three Months Ended
March 31,
  
 
  
2006
  
2005
  
Consolidated Statement Of Operations Data: (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
          
Total revenue
  
$
11,843
  
$
—
  
Cost of transportation
    
7,480
    
—
  
 
              
Net revenue
    
4,363
    
—
  
Operating expenses
    
4,490
    
14
 
 
              
Loss from operations
    
(127
)
  
(14
)
Other income (expense)
    
(2
)
  
—
  
               
Loss before income taxes
    
(129
)
  
(14
)
Income tax expense (benefit)
    
(102
)
  
—
  
 
              
Net loss
 
$
(27
)
$
(14
)
 
              
Net loss per common share (1) :
          
Basic and diluted
  
$
0.00
  
$
0.00
  
 
              
Weighted average common shares:
          
Basic and diluted
    
32,755
    
25,964
  
               
 
(1)
For all periods presented, the weighted average common shares outstanding have been adjusted to reflect 3.5:1 stock split effected in October of 2005.
 
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data for the Five Years ended December 31, 2005 (historical and audited); (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 

   
Selected Financial Data
Year ended December 31,
  
 
  
2005
  
2004
  
2003
  
2002
  
2001
  
Consolidated Statement Of Operations Data: (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
                      
Total revenue
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
Cost of transportation
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
  
 
                                
Net revenue
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
  
Operating expenses
    
162
    
23
    
30
    
124
    
14
  
 
                                
Income (loss) from operations
    
14
    
(23
)
  
(30
)
  
(124
)
  
(14
)
Other income (expense)
    
(1
)
  
(2
)
  
—
    
—
    
—
  
 
                                
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense and minority interest
    
(149
)
  
(25
)
  
(30
)
  
(124
)
  
(14
)
Income tax expense
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
  
 
                                
Net income (loss)
 
$
(149
)
$
(25
)
$
(30
)
$
(124
)
$
(14
)
 
                                
Net income (loss) per common share:
                      
Basic and diluted
  
$
(0.01
)
$
0.00
  
$
0.00
  
$
(0.01
)
$
0.00
  
 
                                
Weighted average common shares (1) :
                      
Basic and diluted
    
26,490
    
25,964
    
25,964
    
22,424
    
8,138
  
 
                                
 
(1)
For all periods presented, the weighted average common shares outstanding have been adjusted to reflect 3.5:1 stock split effected in October of 2005.
 
12
 
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: (In Thousands)

         
December 31,
  
 
    
March  31,
2006 
    
2005
    
2004
    
2003
    
2002
    
2001
  
Cash and cash equivalents
  
$
703
  
$
5,266
  
$
19
  
$
51
  
$
27
  
$
—
  
Working capital
    
803
    
5,143
    
17
    
42
    
20
    
(10
)
Total assets
    
15,753
    
5,307
    
19
    
51
    
27
    
—
  
Long-term debt
    
1,781
    
—
    
50
    
50
    
—
    
—
  
Stockholders' equity
    
6,261
    
5,159
    
(33
)
  
(8
)
  
20
    
(10
)
 
Supplemental Pro Forma Financial Information
 
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data for the interim periods ending March 31, 2006 (historic and unaduited) and March 31, 2005 (pro forma and unaudited); (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
   
 Historic
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
 Pro Forma (1)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
   
 2006
  
 2005
  
Consolidated Statement Of Operations Data: (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
              
Total revenue
  
$
11,842
  
$
12,566
  
Cost of transportation
    
7,480
    
7,330
  
 
              
Net revenue
    
4,363
    
5,236
  
Operating expenses
    
4,490
    
5,243
  
 
              
Loss from operations
    
(127
)
  
(7
)
Other income (expense)
    
(2
)
  
(2
)
               
Loss before income taxes
    
(129
)
  
(9
)
Income tax expense (benefit)
    
(102
)
  
(3
)
 
              
Net loss
 
$
(27
)
$
(6
)
 
              
Net loss per common share:
          
Basic and diluted
  
$
0.00
  
$
0.00
  
 
              
Weighted average common shares:
          
Basic and diluted
    
32,755
    
25,964
  
 
              
 
(1) The pro forma income from operations information provided above includes approximately $14,000 in costs associated with the continuing operations of the Company plus the historical results of Airgroup, adjusted to reflect amortization of acquired intangibles.

 
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data for the Two Years ended June 30, 2005 (pro forma and unaudited); (in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
Supplemental pro forma information is being provided since historical data which merely reflects the prior period results of the Company on a stand-alone basis prior to the acquisition of Airgroup would provide no meaningful data with respect to our ongoing operations.
 
 
  
Pro Forma (1)
Years Ended
June 30,
  
 
  
2005
  
2004
  
Consolidated Statement Of Operations Data: (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
          
Total revenue
  
$
51,521
  
$
42,972
  
Cost of transportation
    
29,957
    
22,832
  
 
              
Net revenue
    
21,564
    
20,140
  
Operating expenses
    
19,974
    
18,588
  
 
              
Income (loss) from operations
    
1,590
    
1,552
  
Other income (expense)
    
(162
)
  
(163
)
 
              
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense and minority interest
    
1,428
    
1,389
  
Income tax expense
    
486
    
472
  
 
              
Net income (loss)
 
$
942
  
$
917
  
 
              
Net income (loss) per common share:
          
Basic and diluted
  
$
0.04
  
$
0.04
  
 
              
Weighted average common shares (2) :
          
Basic and diluted
    
25,964
    
25,964
  
 
              
 
(1)
The pro forma income from operations information provided above includes the costs associated with the continuing operations of the Company (approximately $29,000 for 2005 and $31,000 for 2004), plus the historical results of Airgroup, adjusted to reflect amortization of acquired intangibles.
     
(2)
For all periods presented, the weighted average common shares outstanding have been adjusted to reflect 3.5:1 stock split effected in October of 2005.
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes and other information included elsewhere in this Prospectus.

Overview

In conjunction with a change of control transaction completed during October 2005 and discussed under the “Business” section of this prospectus, we: (i) discontinued our former business model; (ii) adopted a new business strategy focused on building a global transportation and supply chain management company; (iii) changed our name to “Radiant Logistics, Inc.” to, among other things, better align our name with our new business focus; and (iv) completed our first acquisition within the logistics industry.
 
We accomplished the first step in our new business strategy by completing the acquisition of Airgroup effective as of January 1, 2006. Airgroup is a Seattle-Washington based non-asset based logistics company providing domestic and international freight forwarding services through a network of 34 exclusive agent offices across North America. Airgroup services a diversified account base including manufacturers, distributors and retailers using a network of independent carriers and over 100 international agents positioned strategically around the world.

Through the strategic acquisition of regional best-of-breed non-asset based transportation and logistics service providers, we intend to build a leading global transportation and supply-chain management company offering a full range of domestic and international freight forwarding and other value added supply chain management services, including order fulfillment, inventory management and warehousing.

As a non-asset based provider of third-party logistics services, we seek to limit our investment in equipment, facilities and working capital through contracts and preferred provider arrangements with various transportation providers who generally provide us with favorable rates, minimum service levels, capacity assurances and priority handling status. Our non-asset based approach allows us to maintain a high level of operating flexibility and leverage a cost structure that is highly variable in nature while the volume of our flow of freight enables us to negotiate attractive pricing with our transportation providers.

Our principal source of income is derived from freight forwarding services. As a freight forwarder, we arrange for the shipment of our customers’ freight from point of origin to point of destination. Generally, we quote our customers a turn key cost for the movement of their freight. Our price quote will often depend upon the customer’s time-definite needs (first day through fifth day delivery), special handling needs (heavy equipment, delicate items, environmentally sensitive goods, electronic components, etc.) and the means of transport (truck, air, ocean or rail). In turn, we assume the responsibility for arranging and paying for the underlying means of transportation.
 
Our transportation revenue represents the total dollar value of services we sell to our customers. Our cost of transportation includes direct costs of transportation, including motor carrier, air, ocean and rail services. We act principally as the service provider to add value in the execution and procurement of these services to our customers. Our net transportation revenue (gross transportation revenue less the direct cost of transportation) is the primary indicator of our ability to source, add value and resell services provided by third parties, and is considered by management to be a key performance measure. In addition, management believes measuring its operating costs as a function of net transportation revenue provides a useful metric, as our ability to control costs as a function of net transportation revenue directly impacts operating earnings.
 


Our operating results will be affected as acquisitions occur. Since all acquisitions are made using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations, our financial statements will only include the results of operations and cash flows of acquired companies for periods subsequent to the date of acquisition.
 
Our GAAP based net income will be affected by non-cash charges relating to the amortization of customer related intangible assets and other intangible assets arising from completed acquisitions. Under applicable accounting standards, purchasers are required to allocate the total consideration in a business combination to the identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the time of acquisition. The excess of the consideration paid over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired is to be allocated to goodwill, which is tested at least annually for impairment. Applicable accounting standards require that we separately account for and value certain identifiable intangible assets based on the unique facts and circumstances of each acquisition. As a result of our acquisition strategy, our net income will include material non-cash charges relating to the amortization of customer related intangible assets and other intangible assets acquired in our acquisitions. Although these charges may increase as we complete more acquisitions, we believe we will actually be growing the value of our intangible assets (e.g., customer relationships). Thus, we believe that earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, is a useful financial measure for investors because it eliminates the effect of these non-cash costs and provides an important metric for our business. Further, the financial covenants of our credit facility adjust EBITDA to exclude costs related to stock option expense and other non-cash charges. Accordingly, we intend to employ EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA as a management tools to measure our historical financial performance and as a benchmark for future financial flexibility.
 
Our operating results are also subject to seasonal trends when measured on a quarterly basis. The impact of seasonality on our business will depend on numerous factors, including the markets in which we operate, holiday seasons, consumer demand and economic conditions. Since our revenue is largely derived from customers whose shipments are dependent upon consumer demand and just-in-time production schedules, the timing of our revenue is often beyond our control. Factors such as shifting demand for retail goods and/or manufacturing production delays could unexpectedly affect the timing of our revenue. As we increase the scale of our operations, seasonal trends in one area of our business may be offset to an extent by opposite trends in another area. We cannot accurately predict the timing of these factors, nor can we accurately estimate the impact of any particular factor, and thus we can give no assurance that historical seasonal patterns will continue in future periods.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
Accounting policies, methods and estimates are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements prepared by management and are based upon management’s current judgments. Those judgments are normally based on knowledge and experience with regard to past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting policies, methods and estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ from management’s current judgments. While there are a number of accounting policies, methods and estimates that affect our financial statements, the areas that are particularly significant include the assessment of the recoverability of long-lived assets, specifically goodwill, acquired intangibles, and revenue recognition.
 
We follow the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 requires an annual impairment test for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, the first step of the impairment test requires that we determine the fair value of each reporting unit, and compare the fair value to the reporting unit’s carrying amount. To the extent a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an indication exists that the reporting unit’s goodwill may be impaired and we must perform a second more detailed impairment assessment. The second impairment assessment involves allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill as of the assessment date. The implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is then compared to the carrying amount of goodwill to quantify an impairment charge as of the assessment date. In the future, we will perform our annual impairment test during our fiscal fourth quarter unless events or circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred before that time.
 

Acquired intangibles consist of customer related intangibles and non-compete agreements arising from our acquisitions. Customer related intangibles will be amortized using accelerated methods over approximately 5 years and non-compete agreements will be amortized using the straight line method over a 5 year period.
 
We follow the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which establishes accounting standards for the impairment of long-lived assets such as property, plant and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization. We review long-lived assets to be held-and-used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows over the remaining useful life of a long-lived asset is less than its carrying amount, the asset is considered to be impaired. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, we estimates fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

As a non-asset based carrier, we do not own transportation assets. We generate the major portion of our air and ocean freight revenues by purchasing transportation services from direct (asset-based) carriers and reselling those services to our customers. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 91-9 “Revenue and Expense Recognition for Freight Services in Process”, revenue from freight forwarding and export services is recognized at the time the freight is tendered to the direct carrier at origin, and direct expenses associated with the cost of transportation are accrued concurrently. These accrued purchased transportation costs are estimates based upon anticipated margins, contractual arrangements with direct carriers and other known factors. The estimates are routinely monitored and compared to actual invoiced costs. The estimates are adjusted as deemed necessary to reflect differences between the original accruals and actual costs of purchased transportation.

We recognize revenue on a gross basis, in accordance with EITF 99-19, “Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net”, as a result of the following: We are the primary obligor responsible for providing the service desired by the customer and are responsible for fulfillment, including the acceptability of the service(s) ordered or purchased by the customer. We, at our sole discretion, set the prices charged to our customers, and are not required to obtain approval or consent from any other party in establishing our prices. We have multiple suppliers for the services we sell to our customers, and have the absolute and complete discretion and right to select the supplier that will provide the product(s) or service(s) ordered by a customer, including changing the supplier on a shipment-by-shipment basis. In most cases, we determine the nature, type, characteristics, and specifications of the service(s) ordered by the customer. We also assume credit risk for the amount billed to the customer.

 
Results of Operations
 
Basis of Presentation

The results of operations discussion that appears below has been presented utilizing a combination of historical and, where relevant, pro forma information to include the effects on our consolidated financial statements of our recently completed: (i) equity offerings; and (ii) acquisition of Airgroup Corporation. Historical financial data has been supplemented, where appropriate, with pro forma financial data since historical data which merely reflects the prior period results of the Company on a stand-alone basis, would provide no meaningful data with respect to our ongoing operations since we were in the development stage prior to our acquisition of Airgroup. The pro forma information has been presented as if we had completed our equity offerings and acquired Airgroup as of January 1, 2005. The pro forma results are also adjusted to reflect a consolidation of the historical results of operations of Airgroup and Radiant as adjusted to reflect the amortization of acquired intangibles and are provided in the Financial Statements included within this prospectus. Similarly, pro forma statements of income have been presented for Airgroup’s fiscal years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 as if we had completed our equity offerings and acquired Airgroup as of July 1, 2003. The pro forma results are also adjusted to reflect a consolidation of the historical results of operations of Airgroup and the Company as adjusted to reflect the amortization of acquired intangibles and are also provided in the Financial Statements included within this prospectus.
 
The pro forma presentation for the interim period ended March 31, 2005 differs from the initial presentation provided in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 18, 2006 reporting the acquisition of Airgroup to: (1) increase our initial estimates for the amortization of acquired intangibles as a result of increased values attributable to the acquired intangibles, (2) reduce our estimate for interest expense associated with the acquisition financing because we incurred less debt to complete the acquisition than we had originally expected; and (3) exclude the impact of anticipated contractual reductions of officers’ and related family members’ compensation at Airgroup so that any such cost reductions could be more easily identified in our comparative analysis.

The pro forma financial data presented is not necessarily indicative of results of operations that would have occurred had this acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or that might be attained in the future.


Quarter ended March 31, 2006 (historic and unaudited) compared to Quarter ended March, 31, 2005 (historic and unaudited)

We generated transportation revenue of $11.8 million and net transportation revenue of $4.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 with no revenues for the comparative prior year period. Net loss was $27,110 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to a loss of $14,330 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.

We had adjusted earnings (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) of approximately $122,000 and ($14,000) for three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. EBITDA, is a non-GAAP measure of income and does not include the effects of interest and taxes, and excludes the “non-cash” effects of depreciation and amortization on current assets. Companies have some discretion as to which elements of depreciation and amortization are excluded in the EBITDA calculation. We exclude all depreciation charges related to property, plant and equipment, and all amortization charges, including amortization of goodwill, leasehold improvements and other intangible assets. While management considers EBITDA useful in analyzing our results, it is not intended to replace any presentation included in our consolidated financial statements.

The following table provides a reconciliation of March 31, 2006 (historic and unaudited) and March 31, 2005 historic and unaudited) adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure in accordance with SEC Regulation G (in thousands):

   
Three months ended March 31,
  
Change
  
   
2006
  
2005
  
Amount
  
Percent
  
                   
Net loss 
  
$
(27
)
$
(14
)
$
(13
)
  
NM
  
Income tax expense (benefit)
   
(102
)
  
-
    
(102
)
  
NM
  
Interest expense
    
2
    
-
    
2
    
-
  
Depreciation and amortization
    
206
    
-
    
206
    
NM
  
                           
EBITDA (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)
  
$
79
  
$
(14
)
$
93
    
127.4
%
                           
Stock Options and other non-cash costs
    
43
    
-
    
43
    
NM
  
Adjusted EBITDA
  
$
122
  
$
(14
)
$
136
    
NM
  
 
The following table summarizes March 31, 2006 (historic and unaudited) and March 31, 2005 (historic and unaudited) transportation revenue, cost of transportation and net transportation revenue (in thousands):
 
   
Three months ended March 31,
  
Change
  
   
2006
  
2005
  
Amount
  
Percent
  
                   
Transportation revenue
  
$
11,843
  
$
-
  
$
11,843
    
NM
  
Cost of transportation
    
7,480
    
-
    
7,480
    
NM
  
                           
 
Net transportation revenue
  
$
4,363
  
$
-
  
$
4,363
    
NM
  
Net transportation margins
    
36.8
%
  
-
              
 
Transportation revenue was $11.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Domestic and International transportation revenue was $7.5 million and $4.3 million, respectively. There were no revenues for the comparable prior year period.
 

Cost of transportation increased to 63.2% of transportation revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2006 with no comparable data for the prior year period.
 
Net transportation margins were 36.8% of transportation revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2006 with no comparable data for the prior year period.
 
The following table compares certain March 31, 2006 (historic and unaudited) and March 31, 2005 (historic and unaudited) condensed consolidated statement of income data as a percentage of our net transportation revenue (in thousands):
 
   
Three months ended March 31,
          
   
2006
  
2005
  
Change
  
   
Amount
  
Percent
  
Amount
  
Percent
  
Amount
  
Percent
  
                           
Net transportation revenue
  
$
4,363
    
100.0
%
$
-
    
NM
  
$
4,363
    
-0.4
%
                                       
Agent commissions
    
3,198
    
73.3
%
  
-
    
NM
    
3,198
    
-17.6
%
Personnel costs
    
639
    
14.6
%
  
-
    
NM
    
639
    
-23.2
%
Other selling, general and administrative
    
447
   
10.2
%
  
14
    
NM
    
433
    
36.3
%
Depreciation and amortization
    
206
    
4.7
%
  
-
    
NM
    
206
    
3.5
%
                                       
Total operating costs
    
4,490
    
102.9
%
  
14
    
NM
    
4,476
    
-14.4
%
                                       
Loss from operations
    
(127
)
  
-2.9
%
  
(14
)
  
NM
    
(113
)
  
NM
  
Other expense
    
(2
)
  
-0.1
%
  
-
    
NM
    
(2
)
  
NM
  
                                       
Loss before income taxes
    
(129
)
  
-.3.0
%
  
(14
)
  
NM
    
(115
)
  
NM
  
Income tax expense (benefit)
    
(102
)
  
-2.4
%
  
-
    
NM
    
(102
)
  
NM
  
                                       
Net loss
  
$
(27
)
  
-.6
%
$
(14
)
  
NM
  
$
(13
)
  
NM
  
 
Agent commissions were $3.2 million and 73.3% of net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006. There were no similar costs for the comparable prior year period.
 
Personnel costs were $639,000 14.6% of net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006. There were no similar costs for the comparable prior year period.
 
Other selling, general and administrative costs were $447,000 and 10.2% of net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to $14,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005
 
Depreciation and amortization costs were approximately $200,000 and 4.7% of net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006. There were no similar costs for the comparable prior year period.

Loss from operations was $127,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to a loss from operations of $14,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.


Net loss was $27,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, compared to a net loss of $14,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
 
Quarter ended March 31, 2006 (historic and unaudited) compared to the Quarter ended March 31, 2005 (pro forma and unaudited)
 
We generated transportation revenue of $11.8 million and $12.6 million and net transportation revenue of $4.4 million and $5.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net loss was $27,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to a loss of $6,000 for the three months ended March 31. 2005.

We had adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) of approximately $122,000 and $192,000 for three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. EBITDA, is a non-GAAP measure of income and does not include the effects of interest and taxes, and excludes the “non-cash” effects of depreciation and amortization on current assets. Companies have some discretion as to which elements of depreciation and amortization are excluded in the EBITDA calculation. We exclude all depreciation charges related to property, plant and equipment, and all amortization charges, including amortization of goodwill, leasehold improvements and other intangible assets. While management considers EBITDA useful in analyzing our results, it is not intended to replace any presentation included in our consolidated financial statements.
 
The following table provides a reconciliation of March 31, 2006 (historic and unaudited) and March 31, 2005 (pro forma and unaudited) adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure in accordance with SEC Regulation G (in thousands):

   
Three months ended March 31,
  
Change
  
   
2006
  
 2005
  
Amount
  
 Percent
  
                     
Net loss 
  
$
(27
)
$
(6
)
$
(21
)
  
NM
  
Income tax expense (benefit)
    
(102
)
  
(3
)
  
(99
)
  
NM
  
Interest expense
    
2
    
2
    
-
    
-
  
Depreciation and amortization
    
206
    
199
    
7
    
3.5
%
                           
EBITDA (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)
  
$
79
  
$
192
  
$
(113
)
  
-58.9
%
                           
Stock Options and other non-cash costs
    
43
    
-
    
43
    
100
%
Adjusted EBITDA
  
$
122
  
$
192
  
$
(70
)
  
-36.5
%
 

The following table summarizes March 31, 2006 (historic and unaudited) and March 31, 2005 (pro forma and unaudited) transportation revenue, cost of transportation and net transportation revenue (in thousands):
 
   
Three months ended March 31,
  
Change
  
   
2006
  
2005
  
Amount
  
Percent
  
                   
Transportation revenue
  
$
11,843
  
$
12,566
  
$
(723
)
  
-5.8
%
Cost of transportation
    
7,480
    
7,330
    
(150
)
  
-2.0
%
                           
Net transportation revenue
  
$
4,363
  
$
5,236
  
$
(873
)
  
-16.7
%
Net transportation margins
    
36.8
%
  
41.7
%
            

Transportation revenue was $11.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, a decrease of 5.8% over total transportation revenue of $12.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Domestic transportation revenue decreased by 15.6% to $7.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from $8.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The decrease was due primarily to project services work done in 2005 which was completed in April of 2005. International transportation revenue increased by 18.4% to $4.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from $3.6 million for the comparable prior year period, due mainly to increased air and ocean import freight volume.
 
Cost of transportation increased to 63.2% of transportation revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from 58.3% of transportation revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2005. This increase was primarily due to increased international ocean import freight volume which historically reflects a higher cost of transportation as a percentage of sales.
 
Net transportation margins decreased to 36.8% of transportation revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from 41.7% of transportation revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as a result of the factors described above.


The following table compares certain March 31, 2006 (historic and unaudited) and March 31, 2005 (pro forma and unaudited) condensed consolidated statement of income data as a percentage of our net transportation revenue (in thousands):
 
   
Three months ended March 31,
          
   
2006
  
2005
  
Change
  
   
Amount
  
Percent
  
Amount
  
Percent
  
Amount
  
Percent
  
                           
Net transportation revenue
  
$
4,363
    
100.0
%
$
5,236
    
100.0
%
$
(873
)
  
-0.4
%
                                       
Agent commissions
    
3,198
    
73.3
%
  
3,883
    
74.2
%
  
(685
)
  
-17.6
%
Personnel costs
    
639
    
14.6
%
  
832
    
15.9
%
  
(193
)
  
-23.2
%
Other selling, general and administrative
    
447
   
10.2
%
  
328
    
6.3
%
  
119
    
36.3
%
Depreciation and amortization
    
206
    
4.7
%
  
199
    
3.8
%
  
7
    
3.5
%
                                       
Total operating costs
    
4,490
    
102.9
%
  
5,243
    
100.1
%
  
(753
)
  
-14.4
%
                                       
Loss from operations
    
(127
)
  
-2.9
%
  
(7
)
  
-0.1
%
  
(120
)
  
NM
  
Other expense
    
(2
)
  
-0.1
%
  
(2
)
  
-0.1
%
  
0
    
NM
  
                                       
Loss before income taxes
    
(129
)
  
-.3.0
%
  
(9
)
  
-0.2
%
  
(120
)
  
NM
  
Income tax expense (benefit)
    
(102
)
  
-2.4
%
  
(3
)
  
-0.1
%
  
(99
)
  
NM
  
                                       
Net loss
  
$
(27
)
  
-.6
%
$
(6
)
  
-0.1
%
$
(21
)
  
NM
  

Agent commissions were $3.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, a decrease of 17.6% from $3.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Agent commissions as a percentage of net revenue decreased to 73.3% for three months ended March 31, 2006 from 74.2% for the comparable prior year period as a result of increased international ocean import freight volume at reduced margins which reduced amounts paid as commissions.
 
Personnel costs were $639,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, a decrease of 23.2% from $832,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Personnel costs as a percentage of net revenue decreased to 14.6% for three months ended March 31, 2006 from 15.9% for the comparable prior year period as a result of contractual reductions in compensation paid to certain of the selling shareholders of Airgroup.
 
Other selling, general and administrative costs were $447,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, an increase of 36.3% from $328,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005. As a percentage of net revenue, other selling, general and administrative costs increased to 10.2% for three months ended March 31, 2006 from 6.3% for the comparable prior year period primarily as a result of transaction costs incurred by Airgroup in connection with the sale of the company to us and the incremental costs associated with operating as a public company.


Depreciation and amortization costs remained relatively unchanged at approximately $200,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of net revenue remained relatively unchanged at approximately 4.7% and 3.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
 
Loss from operations was $127,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to a loss from operations of $7,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.

Net loss was $27,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, compared to a net loss of $6,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
 
Year ended December 31, 2005 (historical and audited) compared to year ended December 31, 2004 (historical and audited)

The following table compares certain December 31, 2005 and 2004 (audited) consolidated statement of income data as a percentage of our net transportation revenue (in thousands):
 
   
Year ended December 31,
          
   
2005
  
2004
  
Change
  
   
Amount
  
Percent
  
Amount
  
Percent
  
Amount
  
Percent
  
                           
Net revenue
  
$
-
    
NM
  
$
-
    
NM
  
$
-
    
NM
  
                                       
Other selling, general and administrative
   
162
    
NM
    
23
    
NM
    
115-
    
NM
  
                                       
Total operating costs
    
162
    
NM
    
23
    
NM
    
139
    
NM
  
                                       
Loss from operations
    
(162
)
  
NM
    
(23
)
  
NM
    
(139
)
  
NM
  
Other income (expense)
    
13
    
NM
    
(2
)
  
NM
    
15
    
NM
  
                                       
Loss before income taxes
    
(149
)
  
NM
    
(25
)
  
NM
    
(124
)
  
NM
  
Income tax expense
   
-
    
NM
    
-
    
NM
    
-
    
NM
  
                                       
Net loss
 
$
(149
)
  
NM
  
$
(25
)
  
NM
    
(124
)
  
NM
  

As we remained in the development stage for all of 2005 and 2004, we had no transportation revenue for these years and incurred operating costs of approximately $162,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to operating costs of approximately $23,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004.

The year over year increase in operating costs resulted from our increased activities in the fourth quarter of 2005 in connection with the Company’s change in management and strategy to enter into the logistics business. Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2005 was approximately $149,000 compared to a net loss of approximately $25,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004.


Year ended December 31, 2004 (historical and audited) compared to year ended December 31, 2003 (historical and audited)

The following table compares certain December 31, 2004 and 2003 (audited) consolidated statement of income data as a percentage of our net transportation revenue (in thousands):
 
   
Year ended December 31,
          
   
2004
  
2003
  
Change
  
   
Amount
  
Percent
  
Amount
  
Percent
  
Amount
  
Percent
  
                           
Net revenue
  
$
-
    
NM
  
$
-
    
NM
  
$
-
    
NM
  
                                       
Other selling, general and administrative
   
23
    
NM
    
30
    
NM
    
(7
)
  
-23.3
%
                                       
Total operating costs
    
23
    
NM
    
30
    
NM
    
(7
)
  
-23.3
%
                                       
Loss from operations
    
(23
)
  
NM
    
(30
)
  
NM
    
7
    
-23.3
%
Other income (expense)
    
(2
)
  
NM
    
-
    
NM
    
(2
)
  
NM
  
                                       
Loss before income taxes
    
(25
)
  
NM
    
(30
)
  
NM
    
5
    
16.7
%
Income tax expense
   
-
    
NM
    
-
    
NM
    
-
    
NM
  
                                       
Net loss
 
$
(25
)
  
NM
  
$
(30
)
  
NM
    
5
    
16.7
%

As we remained in the development stage for all of 2004 and 2003, we had no transportation revenue for these years and operating costs remained relatively unchanged at approximately $23,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to operating costs of approximately $30,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Net loss also remained relatively unchanged at approximately $23,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to a net loss of approximately $30,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003.


Supplemental Pro Forma Information for the Airgroup year ended June 30, 2005 (pro forma and unaudited) compared to year ended June 30, 2004 (pro forma and unaudited)

We generated transportation revenue of $51.5 million and $43.0 million, and net transportation revenue of $21.6 million and $20.1 million for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Net income remained relatively unchanged at approximately $0.9 million for each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

We had earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) of approximately $2.3 million for each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. EBITDA, is a non-GAAP measure of income and does not include the effects of interest and taxes, and excludes the “non-cash” effects of depreciation and amortization on current assets. Companies have some discretion as to which elements of depreciation and amortization are excluded in the EBITDA calculation. We exclude all depreciation charges related to property, plant and equipment, and all amortization charges, including amortization of goodwill, leasehold improvements and other intangible assets. While management considers EBITDA useful in analyzing our results, it is not intended to replace any presentation included in our consolidated financial statements.

The following table provides a reconciliation of June 30, 2005 and 2004 (pro forma and unaudited) EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure in accordance with SEC Regulation G (in thousands):

   
Year ended June 30,
  
Change
  
   
2005
  
2004
  
Amount
  
Percent
  
                   
Net income 
  
$
942
  
$
917
  
$
25
    
2.7
%
Income tax expense
    
486
    
472
    
14
    
3.0
%
Interest expense
    
162
    
163
    
(1
)
  
-0.6
%
Depreciation and amortization
    
688
    
760
    
(72
)
  
-9.5
%
                           
EBITDA (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)
  
$
2,278
  
$
2,312
  
$
(34
)
  
-1.5
%
 
The following table summarizes June 30, 2005 and 2004 (pro forma and unaudited) transportation revenue, cost of transportation and net transportation revenue (in thousands):
 
   
Year ended June 30,
  
Change
  
   
2005
  
2004
  
Amount
  
Percent
  
                   
Transportation revenue
  
$
51,521
  
$
42,972
  
$
8,549
    
19.9
%
Cost of transportation
    
29,957
    
22,832
    
7,125
    
31.2
%
                           
Net transportation revenue
  
$
21,564
  
$
20,140
  
$
1,424
    
7.1
%
Net transportation margins
    
41.9
%
  
46.9
%
            
 

Transportation revenue was $51.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2005, an increase of 19.9% over total transportation revenue of $43.0 million for the year ended June 30 2004. Domestic transportation revenue increased by 7.0% to $38.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2005 from $35.9 million for the prior fiscal year as a result of organic growth across the network. International transportation revenue increased by 84.5% to $13.1 million for the 2005 fiscal year from $7.1 million for the 2004 fiscal year, due mainly to increased air and ocean import freight volume.
 
Cost of transportation increased to 58.1% of transportation revenue for the year ended June 30, 2005 from 53.1% of transportation revenue for the 2004 fiscal year. This increase was primarily due to increased international ocean import freight volume which historically reflects a higher cost of transportation as a percentage of sales.
 
Net transportation margins decreased to 41.9% of transportation revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 from 46.9% of transportation revenue for the 2004 fiscal year as a result of the factors described above.
 
The following table compares certain June 30, 2005 and 2004 (pro forma and unaudited) consolidated statement of income data as a percentage of our net transportation revenue (in thousands):
 
   
Year ended June 30,
          
   
2005
  
2004
  
Change
  
   
Amount
  
Percent
  
Amount
  
Percent
  
Amount
  
Percent
  
                           
Net transportation revenue
  
$
21,564
    
100.0
%
$
20,140
    
100.0
%
$
1,424
    
7.1
%
                                       
Agent commissions
    
15,988
    
74.1
%
  
14,912
    
74.0
%
  
1,076
    
7.2
%
Personnel costs
    
1,956
    
9.1
%
  
1,740
    
8.7
%
  
216
    
12.4
%
Other selling, general and administrative
    
1,342
   
6.2
%
  
1,176
    
5.8
%
  
166
    
14.1
%
Depreciation and amortization
    
688
    
3.2
%
  
760
    
3.8
%
  
(72
)
  
-9.5
%
                                       
Total operating costs
    
19,974
    
92.6
%
  
18,588
    
92.3
%
  
1,386
    
7.5
%
                                       
Income from operations
    
1,590
    
7.4
%
  
1,552
    
7.7
%
  
38
    
2.4
%
Other expense
    
162
    
-0.8
%
  
163
    
-0.8
%
  
1
    
-0.6
%
                                       
Income before income taxes
    
1,428
    
6.6
%
  
1,389
    
6.9
%
  
39
    
2.8
%
Income tax expense
   
486
    
2.3
%
  
472
    
2.3
%
  
14
    
3.0
%
                                       
Net income
 
$
942
    
4.4
%
$
917
    
4.6
%
$
25
    
278
%
 
Agent commissions were $16.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2005, an increase of 7.2% over $14.9 million for the year ended June 30 2004. Agent commissions as a percentage of net revenue remained relatively unchanged at approximately 74.0%.
 


Personnel costs were $2.0 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, an increase of 12.4% over $1.7 million for the 2004 fiscal year. Personnel costs as a percentage of net revenue increased to 9.1% for the 2005 fiscal year from 8.7% for the 2004 fiscal year. This increase resulted primarily from the hiring of a senior operating officer in November of 2004. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 compared to the prior year period, headcount decreased by 4 to a total of 34 individuals who primarily provide finance and administrative services for the benefit of the agent offices.
 
Other selling, general and administrative costs were $1.3 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, an increase of 14.1% over $1.2 million for the 2004 fiscal year. This increase was primarily the result of increased costs associated with updating our web-site. As a percentage of net revenue, other selling, general and administrative costs increased to 6.2% for the fiscal year ended 2005 from 5.8% for the 2004 fiscal year.
 
Depreciation and amortization was $0.7 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of 9.5% over $0.8 million for the 2004 fiscal year. Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of net revenue decreased to 3.2% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 from 3.8% for the 2004 fiscal year.

Income from operations remained relatively unchanged at $1.6 million for fiscal years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
 
Net income remained relatively unchanged at approximately $0.9 million for fiscal years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources

Effective January 1, 2006, we acquired 100 percent of the outstanding stock of Airgroup. The transaction was valued at up to $14.0 million and consisted of: (i) $9.5 million payable in cash at closing; (ii) an additional base payment of $0.6 million payable in cash on the one-year anniversary of the closing, provided at least 31 of Airgroup’s locations remain operational through the first anniversary of the closing (the “Additional Base Payment”); (iii) a subsequent cash payment of $0.5 million in cash on the two-year anniversary of the closing; (iv) a base earn-out payment of $1.9 million payable in Company common stock over a three-year earn-out period based upon Airgroup achieving income from continuing operations of not less than $2.5 million per year; and (v) as additional incentive to achieve future earnings growth, an opportunity to earn up to an additional $1.5 million payable in Company common stock at the end of a five-year earn-out period (the “Tier-2 Earn-Out”). Under Airgroup’s Tier-2 Earn-Out, the former shareholders of Airgroup are entitled to receive 50% of the cumulative income from continuing operations in excess of $15,000,000 generated during the five-year earn-out period up to a maximum of $1,500,000. With respect to the base earn-out payment of $1.9 million, in the event there is a shortfall in income from continuing operations, the earn-out payment will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis to the extent of the shortfall. Shortfalls may be carried over or carried back to the extent that income from continuing operations in any other payout year exceeds the $2.5 million level.
 

In preparation for, and in conjunction with, the Airgroup transaction, we secured financing proceeds through several private placements of our common stock to a limited number of accredited investors as follows:

Date
  
Shares Sold
  
Gross Proceeds
  
Price Per Share
  
● October 2005
    
2,272,728
  
$
1.0 million
  
$
0.44
  
● December 2005
    
10,098,934
  
$
4.4 million
  
$
0.44
  
● January 2006
    
1,009,093
  
$
444,000
  
$
0.44
  
● February 2006
    
1,446,697
  
$
645,000
  
$
0.44
  

In January 2006, we entered into a $10.0 million secured credit facility with Bank of America, N.A with a term of two years (the “Facility”). The Facility is collateralized by our accounts receivable and other assets of the Company and our subsidiaries. Advances under the Facility are available to fund future acquisitions, capital expenditures or for other corporate purposes. Borrowings under the facility bear interest, at our option, at prime minus 1.00% or LIBOR plus 1.55% and can be adjusted up or down during the term of the Facility based on our performance relative to certain financial covenants. The facility provides for advances of up to 75% of our eligible accounts receivable.

As of June 19, 2006, we had approximately $442,000 outstanding under the Facility and we had eligible accounts receivable sufficient to support approximately $3.6 million in borrowings. The terms of our Facility are subject to certain financial and operational covenants which may limit the amount otherwise available under the Facility. The first covenant limits our funded debt to a multiple of 3.00 times our consolidated EBITDA measured on a rolling four quarter basis (or a multiple of 3.25 at a reduced advance rate of 70.0%). The second financial covenant requires that we maintain a basic fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.1 to 1.0. The third financial covenant is a minimum profitability standard that requires us not to incur a net loss before taxes, amortization of acquired intangibles and extraordinary items in any two consecutive quarterly accounting periods.
 
Under the terms of the Facility, we are permitted to make additional acquisitions without the lender's consent only if certain conditions are satisfied. The conditions imposed by the Facility include the following: (i) the absence of an event of default under the Facility, (ii) the company to be acquired must be in the transportation and logistics industry, (iii) the purchase price to be paid must be consistent with our historical business and acquisition model, (iv) after giving effect for the funding of the acquisition, we must have undrawn availability of at least $2.0 million under the Facility, (v) the lender must be reasonably satisfied with projected financial statements we provide covering a 12 month period following the acquisition, (vi) the acquisition documents must be provided to the lender and must be consistent with the description of the transaction provided to the lender, and (vii) the number of permitted acquisitions is limited to three per calendar year and shall not exceed $7.5 million in aggregate purchase price financed by funded debt. In the event that we are not able to satisfy the conditions of the Facility in connection with a proposed acquisition, we would have to either forego the acquisition, obtain the lender's consent, or retire the Facility. This may limit or slow our ability to achieve the critical mass we may need to achieve our strategic objectives.


 
The following table summarizes our contingent base earn-out payments for the fiscal years indicated based on results of the prior year (in thousands)(1):
 
   
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
  
   
2007
 
2008
 
2009
 
2010
 
2011
 
Total
  
                           
Earn-out payments:
                          
Cash
  
$
600(2
)
$
500
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
1,100
  
Equity
    
—
    
633
    
633
    
634
    
—
    
1,900
  
Total earn-out Payments
  
$
600
  
$
1,133
  
$
633
  
$
634
  
$
—
  
$
3,000
  
                                       
Prior year earnings targets (income from continuing operations) (3)
                                      
                                       
Total earnings targets
  
$
—
  
$
2,500
  
$
2,500
  
$
2,500
  
$
—
  
$
7,500
  
                                       
Earn-outs as a percentage of prior year earnings targets:
                                      
                                       
Total
    
—
    
45.3
%
  
25.3
%
  
25.3
%
  
—
    
40.0
%

   
(1) 
During the fiscal year 2007-2011 earn-out period, there is an additional contingent obligation related to tier-two earn-outs that could be as much as $1.5 million if Airgroup generates at least $18.0 million in income from continuing operations during the period.
 
 
(2) 
Payable in cash on the one-year anniversary of the closing, so long as at least 31 of Airgroup’s agent operations remain operational through the first anniversary of the closing.
   
(3)
Income from continuing operations as presented refers to the uniquely defined earnings targets of Airgroup and should not be interpreted to be the consolidated income from continuing operations of the Company which would give effect to, among other things, amortization or impairment of intangible assets or various other expenses which may not be charged to Airgroup for purposes of calculating earn-outs.

Net cash used by operating activities for the three months ending March 31, 2006 was $0.3 million compared to $.01 million at March 31, 2005. The change was principally driven by a greater reduction in accounts payable than in accounts receivable.

Net cash used for investing was $7.1 million for three months ending March 31, 2006 while there was no activity for the same comparable time frame in 2005. $10.1 million was used for the acquisition of Airgroup which had a cash balance of $2.8 million at the time it was acquired by the company at January 1, 2006 and is netted against cash used for the acquisition for purposes of the consolidated statement of cash flows.

Net cash provided by financing activity for three months ending March 31, 2006, was $2.8 million compared to $.02 million for the same period in 2005. Financing activities in 2006 consisted of issuing 2,475,790 shares of common stock for $1.1 million. During January and February 2006, respectively, $0.4 million of shares were issued to certain shareholders and employees of Airgroup, while $0.7 million of the shares were issued to other accredited investors for cash. Also associated with the acquisition of Airgroup, there is $0.5 million due to Airgroup in 2007. The Company also has a credit facility which it drew down $0.3 million and used for operations.
 
31

Disclosures About Contractual Obligations

We have entered into contracts with various third parties in the normal course of business that will require future payments. The following table illustrates our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2006:
 

 
  
Payments due by period
  
 
  
Total
 
Less than 1 year
  
1-3 years
  
3-5 years
  
More than 5 years
  
Contractual Obligations
                                
Long-Term Debt
  
$
1,781
  
$
500
  
$
1,281
  
$
-
  
$
-
  
Capital Leases
   
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
  
Operating Leases
   
383
    
100
    
251
    
32
    
-
  
Purchase Obligations
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
  
Other Long-Term Liabilities
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
-
  
Total Contractual Obligations
  
$
2,164
  
$
600
  
$
1,532
  
$
32
    
-
  
 
We believe that our current working capital and anticipated cash flow from operations are adequate to fund existing operations. However, our ability to finance further acquisitions is limited by the availability of additional capital. We may, however, finance acquisitions using our common stock as all or some portion of the consideration. In the event that our common stock does not attain or maintain a sufficient market value or potential acquisition candidates are otherwise unwilling to accept our securities as part of the purchase price for the sale of their businesses, we may be required to utilize more of our cash resources, if available, in order to continue our acquisition program. If we do not have sufficient cash resources through either operations or from debt facilities, our growth could be limited unless we are able to obtain such additional capital. In this regard and in the course of executing our acquisition strategy, we expect to pursue an additional equity offering within the next twelve months.

We have used a significant amount of our available capital to finance the acquisition of Airgroup. We expect to structure acquisitions with certain amounts paid at closing, and the balance paid over a number of years in the form of earn-out installments which are payable based upon the future earnings of the acquired businesses payable in cash, stock or some combination thereof. As we execute our acquisition strategy, we will be required to make significant payments in the future if the earn-out installments under our various acquisitions become due. While we believe that a portion of any required cash payments will be generated by the acquired businesses, we may have to secure additional sources of capital to fund the remainder of any cash-based earn-out payments as they become due. This presents us with certain business risks relative to the availability of capacity under our Facility, the availability and pricing of future fund raising, as well as the potential dilution to our stockholders to the extent the earn-outs are satisfied directly, or indirectly from the sale of equity.

As of March 31, 2006, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partners, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which had been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.
 
32

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 
The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the Company’s short-term cash investments and its line of credit. The Company is averse to principal loss and ensures the safety and preservation of its invested funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. The Company invests its excess cash in institutional money market accounts. The Company does not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate changes. If market interest rates were to change by 10% from the levels at March 31, 2006, the change in interest expense would have had an immaterial impact on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions.” The amendments made by Statement 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with a broader exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. Previously, Opinion 29 required that the accounting for an exchange of a productive asset for a similar productive asset or an equivalent interest in the same or similar productive asset should be based on the recorded amount of the asset relinquished. Opinion 29 provided an exception to its basic measurement principle (fair value) for exchanges of similar productive assets. The Statement is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after the date of issuance. The pronouncement will not affect us as we do not engage in these types of transactions.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”. Statement 123R will provide investors and other users of financial statements with more complete and neutral financial information by requiring that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. Statement 123R covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. Statement 123R replaces FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Statement 123, as originally issued in 1995, established as preferable a fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. However, that Statement permitted entities the option of continuing to apply the guidance in Opinion 25, as long as the footnotes to financial statements disclosed what net income would have been had the preferable fair-value-based method been used. Non-public entities will be required to apply Statement 123R as of the first annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005. We adopted SFAS 123R which resulted in an incremental $29,238 of compensation expense included in our results for the year ended December 31, 2005.

In December 2004, the FASB issued two Staff Positions, FSP 109-1 “Accounting for Income Taxes” to the tax deduction on “Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Job Creation Act of 2004”, and FSP FAS 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision with the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.” Neither of these pronouncements had an effect on us as we do not participate in the related activities.
 
33

In March 2005, the staff of the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”). The interpretations in SAB 107 express views of the staff regarding the interaction between SFAS 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations and provide the staff’s views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. In particular SAB 107 provides guidance related to share-based payment transactions with nonemployees, the transition from public entity status, valuation methods (including assumptions such as expected volatility and expected term), the accounting for certain redeemable financial instruments issued under share-based payment arrangements, the classification of compensation expense, non-GAAP financial measures, first-time adoption of SFAS 123R in an interim period, capitalization of compensation cost related to share-based payment arrangements, the accounting for income tax effects of share-based payment arrangements upon adoption of SFAS 123R and the modification of employee share options prior to adoption of SFAS 123R. Management is currently evaluating the impact SAB 107 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

 In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations” (“FIN 47”). FIN 47 provides guidance relating to the identification of and financial reporting for legal obligations to perform an asset retirement activity. The Interpretation requires recognition of a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability’s fair value can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 also defines when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. The provision is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. We will adopt FIN 47 beginning the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 and do not believe the adoption will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” which replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20 “Accounting Changes” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements-An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28.” SFAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted in the first quarter of fiscal 2006.

In February 2006, the FASB has issued FASB Statement No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments. This standard amends the guidance in FASB Statements No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. Statement 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. Statement 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 155 to have any impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2006, the FASB decided to move forward with the issuance of a final FSP FAS 123R-4 “Classification of Options and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent Event” . The guidance in FSP FAS 123R-4 amends paragraphs 32 and A229 of FASB Statement No. 123R to incorporate the concept articulated in footnote 16 of FAS 123R. That is, a cash settlement feature that can be exercised only upon the occurrence of a contingent event that is outside the employee’s control does not meet the condition in paragraphs 32 and A229 until it becomes probable that the event will occur. Originally under FAS 123R, a provision in a share-based payment plan that required an entity to settle outstanding options in cash upon the occurrence of any contingent event required classification and accounting for the share based payment as a liability. This caused an issue under certain awards that require or permit, at the holder’s election, cash settlement of the option or similar instrument upon (a) a change in control or other liquidity event of the entity or (b) death or disability of the holder. With this new FSP, these types of cash settlement features will not require liability accounting so long as the feature can be exercised only upon the occurrence of a contingent event that is outside the employee’s control (such as an initial public offering) until it becomes probable that event will occur. The guidance in this FSP shall be applied upon initial adoption of Statement 123(R). An entity that adopted Statement 123(R) prior to the issuance of the FSP shall apply the guidance in the FSP in the first reporting period beginning after February 2006. Early application of FSP FAS 123R-4 is permitted in periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company does not expect that this new FSP will have any impact upon its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

34


In June 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on Issue 05-6 , “ Determining the Amortization Period for Leasehold Improvements ”, which requires that leasehold improvements acquired in a business combination or purchased subsequent to the inception of a lease be amortized over the lesser of the useful life of the assets or a term that includes renewals that are reasonably assured at the date of the business combination or purchase. EITF 05-6 is effective for periods beginning after July 1, 2005. The Company does not expect the provisions of this consensus to have any impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

BUSINESS

Background

Radiant Logistics, Inc. (formerly known as “Golf Two, Inc”) (the “Company”) was formed under the laws of the state of Delaware on March 15, 2001. From inception through the third quarter of 2005, the Company’s principal business strategy focused on the development of retail golf stores. In October 2005, our management team consisting of Bohn H. Crain and Stephen M. Cohen completed a change of control transaction when they acquired a majority of the Company’s outstanding securities from the Company’s former officers and directors in privately negotiated transactions. In conjunction with the change of control transaction, we: (i) elected to discontinue the Company’s former business model; (ii) repositioned ourselves as a global transportation and supply chain management company; and (iii) changed our name to “Radiant Logistics, Inc.” to, among other things, better align our name with our new business focus.
 
General

Through the strategic acquisition of regional best-of-breed non-asset based transportation and logistics service providers, we intend to build a leading global transportation and supply-chain management company offering a full range of domestic and international freight forwarding and other value added supply chain management services, including order fulfillment, inventory management and warehousing.

Our strategy has been designed to take advantage of shifting market dynamics. The third party logistics industry continues to grow as an increasing number of businesses outsource their logistics functions to more cost effectively manage and extract value from their supply chains. Also, the industry is positioned for further consolidation as it remains highly fragmented, and as customers are demanding the types of sophisticated and broad reaching service offerings that can more effectively be handled by larger more diverse organizations.

Our acquisition strategy relies upon two primary factors: first, our ability to identify and acquire target businesses that fit within our general acquisition criteria and, second, the continued availability of capital and financing resources sufficient to complete these acquisitions. As to our first factor, following our recent acquisition of Airgroup Corporation (“Airgroup”), we have identified a number of additional companies that may be suitable acquisition candidates and are in preliminary discussions with a select number of them. As to our second factor, our ability to secure additional financing will rely upon the sale of debt or equity securities, and the development of an active trading market for our securities, neither of which can be assured.

35


Our growth strategy relies upon a number of factors, including our ability to efficiently integrate the businesses of the companies we acquire, generate the anticipated economies of scale from the integration, and maintain the historic sales growth of the acquired businesses in order to generate continued organic growth. There are a variety of risks associated with our ability to achieve our strategic objectives, including our ability to acquire and profitably manage additional businesses and the intense competition in our industry for customers and for the acquisition of additional businesses. Certain of these business risks are identified or referred to later in this section and under the section captioned “Risk Factors” beginning on page 3 of this prospectus.
 
We accomplished the first step in our strategy by completing the acquisition of Airgroup effective as of January 1, 2006. Airgroup is a Seattle, Washington based non-asset based logistics company that provides domestic and international freight forwarding services through a network of 34 exclusive agent offices across North America. Airgroup services a diversified account base including manufacturers, distributors and retailers using a network of independent carriers and over 100 international agents positioned strategically around the world.
 
Industry Overview
 
As business requirements for efficient and cost-effective logistics services have increased, so has the importance and complexity of effectively managing freight transportation. Businesses increasingly strive to minimize inventory levels, perform manufacturing and assembly operations in lowest cost locations and distribute their products in numerous global markets. As a result, companies are increasingly looking to third-party logistics providers to help them execute their supply chain strategies.

Customers have two principal third-party alternatives: a freight forwarder or a fully-integrated carrier. A freight forwarder, such as Airgroup, procures shipments from customers and arranges the transportation of the cargo on a carrier. A freight forwarder may also arrange pick-up from the shipper to the carrier and delivery of the shipment from the carrier to the recipient. Freight forwarders often tailor shipment routing to meet the customer’s price and service requirements. Fully-integrated carriers, such as FedEx Corporation, DHL Worldwide Express, Inc. and United Parcel Service (“UPS”), provide pick up and delivery service, primarily through their own captive fleets of trucks and aircraft.  Because freight forwarders select from various transportation options in routing customer shipments, they are often able to serve customers less expensively and with greater flexibility than integrated carriers.  Freight forwarders, generally handle shipments of any size and can offer a variety of customized shipping options.
 
Most freight forwarders, like Airgroup, focus on heavier cargo and do not generally compete with integrated shippers of primarily smaller parcels. In addition to the high fixed expenses associated with owning, operating and maintaining fleets of aircraft, trucks and related equipment, integrated carriers often impose significant restrictions on delivery schedules and shipment weight, size and type.  On occasion, integrated shippers serve as a source of cargo space to forwarders. Additionally, most freight forwarders do not generally compete with the major commercial airlines, which, to some extent, depend on forwarders to procure shipments and supply freight to fill cargo space on their scheduled flights.
 
Based on management’s experience in the logistics industry, we believe there are several factors that are increasing demand for global logistics solutions. The primary factors consist of:

36

·  
Outsourcing of non-core activities. Companies increasingly outsource freight forwarding, warehousing and other supply chain activities to allow them to focus on their respective core competencies. From managing purchase orders to the timely delivery of products, companies turn to third party logistics providers to manage these functions at a lower cost and greater efficiency.

·  
Globalization of trade. As barriers to international trade are reduced or substantially eliminated, international trade is increasing. In addition, companies increasingly are sourcing their parts, supplies and raw materials from the most cost competitive suppliers throughout the world. Outsourcing of manufacturing functions to, or locating company-owned manufacturing facilities in, low cost areas of the world also results in increased volumes of world trade.

·  
Increased need for time-definite delivery. The need for just-in-time and other time-definite delivery has increased as a result of the globalization of manufacturing, greater implementation of demand-driven supply chains, the shortening of product cycles and the increasing value of individual shipments. Many businesses recognize that increased spending on time-definite supply chain management services can decrease overall manufacturing and distribution costs, reduce capital requirements and allow them to manage their working capital more efficiently by reducing inventory levels and inventory loss.

·  
Consolidation of global logistics providers. Companies are decreasing the number of freight forwarders and supply chain management providers with which they interact. We believe companies want to transact business with a limited number of providers that are familiar with their requirements, processes and procedures, and can function as long-term partners. In addition, there is strong pressure on national and regional freight forwarders and supply chain management providers to become aligned with a global network. Larger freight forwarders and supply chain management providers benefit from economies of scale which enable them to negotiate reduced transportation rates and to allocate their overhead over a larger volume of transactions. Globally integrated freight forwarders and supply chain management providers are better situated to provide a full complement of services, including pick-up and delivery, shipment via air, sea and/or road transport, warehousing and distribution, and customs brokerage.

·  
 Increasing influence of e-business and the internet. Technology advances have allowed businesses to connect electronically through the Internet to obtain relevant information and make purchase and sale decisions on a real-time basis, resulting in decreased transaction times and increased business-to-business activity. In response to their customers’ expectations, companies have recognized the benefits of being able to transact business electronically. As such, businesses increasingly are seeking the assistance of supply chain service providers with sophisticated information technology systems who can facilitate real-time transaction processing and web-based shipment monitoring.

Our Business Strategy

Our objective is to provide customers with comprehensive value-added logistics solutions. Initially, we plan to achieve this goal through the basic services offered by Airgroup, which will establish our baseline of service offerings. Thereafter, we expect to grow our business organically and by completing acquisitions of other companies with complementary geographical and logistics service offerings. These acquisitions are generally expected to have earnings of $1.0 to $5.0 million. Companies in this range of earnings may be receptive to our acquisition program since they are often too small to be identified as acquisition targets of larger public companies or to independently attempt their own public offerings.

37

Our Acquisition Strategy

We believe there are many attractive acquisition candidates in our industry because of the highly fragmented composition of the marketplace, the industry participants’ need for capital and their owners’ desire for liquidity. We intend to pursue an aggressive acquisition program to consolidate and enhance our position in our current market and to acquire operations in new markets.

We believe we can successfully implement our acquisition strategy due to the following factors:

·  
the highly fragmented composition of our market;
·  
our strategy for creating an organization with global reach should enhance an acquired
company’s ability to compete in its local and regional markets through an expansion of offered services and lower operating costs;
·  
the potential for increased profitability as a result of our centralization of certain administrative functions, greater purchasing power and economies of scale;
·  
our centralized management capabilities should enable us to effectively manage our growth and integration of acquired companies;
·  
our status as a public corporation may ultimately provide us with a liquid trading currency for acquisitions; and
·  
the ability to utilize our experienced management to identify, acquire and integrate acquisition opportunities.

Initially, we intend to expand our business through acquisitions in key gateway locations such as Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, Seattle, Miami, Dallas and Houston. We also intend to expand our international base of operations. Once our expansion objectives are achieved, we believe that our domestic and expanded international capabilities, when taken together, will provide significant competitive advantage in the marketplace.
 
Our Operating Strategy
 
● Leverage the People, Process and Technology Available through Airgroup. A key element of our operating strategy is to maximize our operational efficiencies by integrating general and administrative functions into the back-office of our platform acquisition and reducing or eliminating redundant functions and facilities at acquired companies. This is designed to enable us to quickly realize potential savings and synergies, efficiently control and monitor operations of acquired companies and allow acquired companies to focus on growing their sales and operations.

● Develop and Maintain Strong Customer Relationships. We seek to develop and maintain strong interactive customer relationships by anticipating and focusing on our customers’ needs. We emphasize a relationship-oriented approach to business, rather than the transaction or assignment-oriented approach used by many of our competitors. To develop close customer relationships, we and our network of exclusive agents regularly meet with both existing and prospective clients to help design solutions for, and identify the resources needed to execute, their supply chain strategies. We believe that this relationship-oriented approach results in greater customer satisfaction and reduced business development expense.
 
38

Operations

Through our acquisition of Airgroup, we offer domestic and international air, ocean and ground freight forwarding for shipments that are generally larger than shipments handled by integrated carriers of primarily small parcels such as Federal Express Corporation and United Parcel Service. As we execute our acquisition strategy, our revenues will ultimately be generated from a number of diverse services, including air freight forwarding, ocean freight forwarding, customs brokerage, logistics and other value-added services.

Our primary business operations involve obtaining shipment or material orders from customers, creating and delivering a wide range of logistics solutions to meet customers’ specific requirements for transportation and related services, and arranging and monitoring all aspects of material flow activity utilizing advanced information technology systems. These logistics solutions will include domestic and international freight forwarding and door-to-door delivery services using a wide range of transportation modes, including air, ocean and truck. As a non-asset based provider we do not own the transportation equipment used to transport the freight. We expect to neither own nor operate any aircraft and, consequently, place no restrictions on delivery schedules or shipment size.  We arrange for transportation of our customers’ shipments via commercial airlines, air cargo carriers, and other assets and non-asset based third-party providers. We select the carrier for a shipment based on route, departure time, available cargo capacity and cost.  We charter cargo aircraft from time to time depending upon seasonality, freight volumes and other factors. We make a profit or margin on the difference between what we charge to our customers for the totality of services provided to them, and what we pay to the transportation provider to transport the freight.
 
Information Services

The regular enhancement of our information systems and ultimate migration of acquired companies to a common set of back-office and customer facing applications is a key component of our acquisition and growth strategy. We believe that the ability to provide accurate real-time information on the status of shipments will become increasingly important and that our efforts in this area will result in competitive service advantages. In addition, we believe that centralizing our transportation management system (rating, routing, tender and financial settlement processes) will drive significant productivity improvement across our network.

We utilize a web-enabled third-party freight forwarding software (Cargowise) which we have integrated to our third-party accounting system (SAP) which combine to form the foundation of our supply-chain technologies which we call “Globalvision”. Globalvision provides us with a common set of back-office operating, accounting and customer facing applications used across the network. We have and will continue to assess technologies obtained through our acquisition strategy and expect to develop a “best-of-breed” solution set using a combination of owned and licensed technologies. This strategy will result in the investment of significant management and financial resources to deliver these enabling technologies.

39

Our Competitive Advantages

As a non-asset based third-party logistics provider with an expanding global presence, we believe that we will be well-positioned to provide cost-effective and efficient solutions to address the demand in the marketplace for transportation and logistics services.  We believe that the most important competitive factors in our industry are quality of service, including reliability, responsiveness, expertise and convenience, scope of operations, geographic coverage, information technology and price.  We believe our primary competitive advantages are:  (i) our low cost; non-asset based business model; (ii) our information technology resources; and (iii) our diverse customer base.

·  
Non-asset based business model.  With relatively no dedicated or fixed operating costs, we are able to leverage our network and offer competitive pricing and flexible solutions to our customers.  Moreover, our balanced product offering provides us with revenue streams from multiple sources and enables us to retain customers even as they shift from priority to deferred shipments of their products.  We believe our model allows us to provide low-cost solutions to our customers while also generating revenues from multiple modes of transportation and logistics services.

·  
Global network.  We intend to focus on expanding our network on a global basis. Once accomplished, this will enable us to provide a closed-loop logistics chain to our customers worldwide.  Within North America, our capabilities consist of our pick up and delivery network, ground and air networks, and logistics capabilities. Our ground and pick up and delivery networks enable us to service the growing deferred forwarding market while providing the domestic connectivity for international shipments once they reach North America.  In addition, our heavyweight air network provides for competitive costs on shipments, as we have no dedicated charters or leases and can capitalize on available capacity in the market to move our customers’ goods.  

·  
Information technology resources.  A primary component of our business strategy is the continued development of advanced information systems to continually provide accurate and timely information to our management and customers.  Our customer delivery tools enable connectivity with our customers’ and trading partners’ systems, which leads to more accurate and up-to-date information on the status of shipments.  

·  
Diverse customer base.  We have a well diversified base of customers that includes manufacturers, distributors and retailers. As of the date of this Prospectus, no single customer represented more than 5% of our business reducing risks associated with any particular industry or customer concentration.

Sales and Marketing

We principally market our services through the senior management teams in place at each of our 34 exclusive agent offices located strategically across the United States. Each office is staffed with operational employees of the agent to provide support for the sales team, develop frequent contact with the customer’s traffic department, and maintain customer service. Through the agency relationship, the agent has the ability to focus on the operational and sales support aspects of the business without diverting costs or expertise to the structural aspect of its operations and provides the agent with the regional, national and global brand recognition that they would not otherwise be able to achieve by serving their local markets.

Sales are primarily generated by our exclusive agents on a localized basis. However, to better utilize our available network of agents, we are in the process of implementing a national accounts program which is intended to increase our emphasis on obtaining high-revenue national accounts with multiple shipping locations. These accounts typically impose numerous requirements on those competing for their freight business, including electronic data interchange and proof of delivery capabilities, the ability to generate customized shipping reports and a nationwide network of terminals. These requirements often limit the competition for these accounts to very small number of logistics providers. We believe that our anticipated future growth and development will enable us to more effectively compete for and obtain these accounts.

40
 
Competition and Business Conditions
 
The logistics business is directly impacted by the volume of domestic and international trade. The volume of such trade is influenced by many factors, including economic and political conditions in the United States and abroad, major work stoppages, exchange controls, currency fluctuations, acts of war, terrorism and other armed conflicts, United States and international laws relating to tariffs, trade restrictions, foreign investments and taxation.

The global logistics services and transportation industries are intensively competitive and are expected to remain so for the foreseeable future. We will compete against other integrated logistics companies, as well as transportation services companies, consultants, information technology vendors and shippers’ transportation departments. This competition is based primarily on rates, quality of service (such as damage-free shipments, on-time delivery and consistent transit times), reliable pickup and delivery and scope of operations. Most of our competitors will have substantially greater financial resources than we do.
 
Regulation
 
There are numerous transportation related regulations. Failure to comply with the applicable regulations or to maintain required permits or licenses could result in substantial fines or revocation of operating permits or authorities. We cannot give assurance as to the degree or cost of future regulations on our business. Some of the regulations affecting our current and prospective operations are described below.

Air freight forwarding businesses are subject to regulation, as an indirect air cargo carrier, under the Federal Aviation Act by the U.S. Department of Transportation. However, air freight forwarders are exempted from most of the Federal Aviation Act’s requirements by the Economic Aviation Regulations. The air freight forwarding industry is subject to regulatory and legislative changes that can affect the economics of the industry by requiring changes in operating practices or influencing the demand for, and the costs of providing, services to customers.

Surface freight forwarding operations are subject to various federal statutes and are regulated by the Surface Transportation Board. This federal agency has broad investigatory and regulatory powers, including the power to issue a certificate of authority or license to engage in the business, to approve specified mergers, consolidations and acquisitions, and to regulate the delivery of some types of domestic shipments and operations within particular geographic areas.

The Surface Transportation Board and U.S. Department of Transportation also have the authority to regulate interstate motor carrier operations, including the regulation of certain rates, charges and accounting systems, to require periodic financial reporting, and to regulate insurance, driver qualifications, operation of motor vehicles, parts and accessories for motor vehicle equipment, hours of service of drivers, inspection, repair, maintenance standards and other safety related matters. The federal laws governing interstate motor carriers have both direct and indirect application to the Company. The breadth and scope of the federal regulations may affect our operations and the motor carriers which are used in the provisioning of the transportation services. In certain locations, state or local permits or registrations may also be required to provide or obtain intrastate motor carrier services.

41

The Federal Maritime Commission, or FMC, regulates and licenses ocean forwarding operations. Indirect ocean carriers (non-vessel operating common carriers) are subject to FMC regulation, under the FMC tariff filing and surety bond requirements, and under the Shipping Act of 1984, particularly those terms proscribing rebating practices.

United States customs brokerage operations are subject to the licensing requirements of the U.S. Treasury and are regulated by the U.S. Customs Service. As we broaden our capabilities to include customs brokerage operations, we will be subject to regulation by the Customs Service. Likewise, any customs brokerage operations would also be licensed in and subject to the regulations of their respective countries.

In the United States, we are subject to federal, state and local provisions relating to the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise for the protection of the environment. Similar laws apply in many foreign jurisdictions in which we may operate in the future. Although current operations have not been significantly affected by compliance with these environmental laws, governments are becoming increasingly sensitive to environmental issues, and we cannot predict what impact future environmental regulations may have on our business. We do not anticipate making any material capital expenditures for environmental control purposes.

Personnel

As of the date of this prospectus, we have approximately 35 employees. None of these employees are currently covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We have experienced no work stoppages and consider our relations with our employees to be good.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
We are not a party to any pending material legal proceeding.
 
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
 
Our offices are located at 1227 120th Avenue N.E., Bellevue, Washington 98005 and consist of approximately 14,500 feet of office space which we lease for approximately $11,300 per month pursuant to lease that expires April 30, 2007. We also maintain approximately 8,125 feet of office space at 19320 Des Moines Memorial Drive South, SeaTac, Washington which we lease for approximately $5,300 per month pursuant to lease that expires December 31, 2010. In addition, we own a small parcel of undeveloped acreage located at Grays Harbor, Washington which is not material to our business. We believe our current offices are adequately covered by insurance and are sufficient to support our operations for the foreseeable future.
 
42

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Below is certain information regarding our directors and executive officers.

The following table sets forth information concerning our executive officers and directors. Each of the executive officers will serve until his or her successor is appointed by our Board of Directors or such executive officer’s earlier resignation or removal. Each of the directors will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders or such director’s earlier resignation or removal.

Name
  
Age
  
Position
         
Bohn H. Crain
  
42
  
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman
         
Stephen M. Cohen
  
49
  
General Counsel, Secretary and Director
         
William H. Moultrie
  
64
  
President and Chief Operating Officer of Airgroup

Bohn H. Crain. Mr. Crain has served as our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman of our Board of Directors since October 10, 2005. Mr. Crain brings over 15 years of industry and capital markets experience in transportation and logistics. Since January 2005, Mr. Crain has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Radiant Capital Partners, LLC, an entity he formed to execute a consolidation strategy in the transportation/logistics sector. Prior to founding Radiant, Mr. Crain served as the executive vice president and the chief financial officer of Stonepath Group, Inc. from January 2002 until December 2004. Stonepath is a global non-asset based provider of third party logistics services listed on the American Stock Exchange. In 2001, Mr. Crain served as the executive vice president and chief financial officer of Schneider Logistics, Inc., a third-party logistics company, and from 2000 to 2001, he served as the vice president and treasurer of Florida East Coast Industries, Inc., a public company engaged in railroad and real estate businesses listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Between 1989 and 2000, Mr. Crain held various vice president and treasury positions for CSX Corp., and several of its subsidiaries, a Fortune 500 transportation company listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Mr. Crain earned a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from the University of Texas.

Stephen M. Cohen. Mr. Cohen has served as our General Counsel, Secretary and member of our Board of Directors since October 10, 2005. In 2004, Mr. Cohen founded SMC Capital Advisors, Inc. which provides business and legal consulting services focusing on corporate finance and federal securities matters. From 2000 until 2004, Mr. Cohen served as senior vice president, general counsel and secretary of Stonepath Group, Inc., a global non-asset based provider of third party logistics services listed on the American Stock Exchange, where he helped transition that company from a venture investor in early stage technology businesses to a global logistics company and assisted in the acquisition of domestic and international logistics companies in the United States, Asia and South America. Prior to 2000, Mr. Cohen practiced law, including having been a shareholder of Buchanan Ingersoll P.C., from 1996 to 2000, and a partner at Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh & Young from 1990 to 1996. Mr. Cohen earned a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from the School of Commerce and Finance of Villanova University in 1977, a Juris Doctor from Temple University in 1980, and an LLM in Taxation from Villanova University School of Law. Mr. Cohen is licensed to practice law in Pennsylvania.
 
William H. Moultrie. Mr. Moultrie serves as the President and Chief Operating Officer of Airgroup Corporation. Mr. Moultrie co-founded Airgroup in March of 1987. Over the past 18 years, he built Airgroup into a non-asset based logistics company providing domestic and international freight forwarding to a diversified account base of manufacturers, distributors and retailers using a network of independent carriers and over 100 international agents positioned strategically around the world with over $50.0 million in annual revenues, and 34 agent offices across North America. Mr. Moultrie has over thirty-five years of logistics experience in the both the domestic and international markets. Mr. Moultrie received a Bachelor of Science from Eastern Washington University.
 
43

Directors’ Term of Office

Directors hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and the election and qualification of their successors. Officers are elected annually by our board of directors and serve at the discretion of the board of directors.

 Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our Board of Directors acts as our audit committee. No member of our Board of Directors has been designated as an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined in Item 401(e) of Regulation S-B promulgated under the Securities Act. Although Bohn H. Crain, our Chief Executive Officer, has the requisite background and professional experience to qualify as an audit committee financial expert, he has not been designated as such by our Board of Directors since: (i) we have no Audit Committee; and (ii) Mr. Crain does not satisfy the “independence” standards adopted by the American Stock Exchange.

Our Board of Directors consists of only two members, both of whom are executive officers of the Company. In addition, to date, we have conducted limited operations, having only concluded our first acquisition during January 2006. In light of the foregoing, and upon evaluating the Company’s internal controls, our Board of Directors determined that our internal controls are adequate to insure that financial information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely and accurate manner in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, our Board of Directors concluded that the benefits of retaining an individual who qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” would be outweighed by the costs of retaining such a person.
 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation paid or accrued for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 to or for the benefit of our Chief Executive Officer and our four most highly compensated executive officers whose total annual salary and bonus compensation exceeded $100,000 (the “Named Executive Officers”).
 
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
 
       
Annual Compensation
  
Long-Term
Compensation Awards
    
Name and Principal Position
      
Salary
  
Bonus
  
Restricted
Stock Awards
  
Number of Options
  
All Other Compensation
Bohn H. Crain, Chief (1)
Chief Executive Officer
  
2005
  
$20,833
  
—
  
—
  
 
2,000,000
  
—
Stephen M. Cohen(2) 
General Counsel and Secretary
 
2005
  
—
  
—
  
—
  
—
  
 
—
 
44
 
(1)  
Mr. Crain has served as our Chief Executive Officer since October 18, 2005. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and from January 1, 2005 until October 17, 2005, we did not pay any compensation to any of our executive officers, except that in 2003 we issued shares of common stock to our former president valued at $90,000.
 
(2)  
Mr. Cohen serves as our General Counsel, Secretary and Director. SMC Capital Advisors, a legal and financial advisory firm owned by Mr. Cohen, provides outside legal services to the Company. Please see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below.
 
The following table sets forth information concerning options granted during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 for each of the Named Executive Officers.
 
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
 
 
 
Number of Options 
 
% of Total Options Granted to Employees in 
 
Exercise 
  
Market Price on Date of  
  
 Expiration
  
Potential Realization Value at Annualized Annual rates of Stock Price Appreciation for Option Term
  
Name
  
Granted
  
Fiscal-Year
  
Price
  
Grant
  
Date
  
5%
  
10%
  
Bohn H. Crain
    
1,000,000(1)
 
  
50
%
$
0.50
  
$
0.44(2)
 
  
October 20, 2015
  
$
216,700
  
$
701,200
  
Bohn H. Crain
    
1,000,000(1)
 
  
50
%
$
0.75
  
$
0.44(2)
 
  
October 20, 2015
    
-
 
$
391,200
  
 
 
(1)
These options vest in equal annual installments over a five year period commencing on the date of grant.
 
 
(2)
As of the date of grant, there was no established trading market for our common stock and there was no trading of our shares on or around the date the options were granted. On or about the date the options were granted, we completed an offering of our common stock at a price of $0.44 per share
 
The following table sets forth information concerning year-end option values for fiscal 2005 for the Named Executive Officers.
 
FISCAL YEAR END OPTION VALUES

   
Number of Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year End
 
Value of Unexercised In-The-Money Options at Fiscal Year End (1)
  
Name
  
Exercisable
  
Unexercisable
  
Exercisable
  
Unexercisable
  
Bohn H. Crain
    
—
    
2,000,000
  
$
-
  
$
0
  
 
 
(1)
As of December 31, 2005, there was no established trading market for our common stock with only a single trade of our shares in late December of 2005. The table has been prepared based on a market value of $0.44 per share, the price at which we sold shares of common stock to independent third party accredited investors in arm’s length transactions between October 2005 and January 2006.
 
45
 
Employment and Option Agreements

On January 13, 2006, we entered into an employment agreement with Bohn H. Crain to serve as our Chief Executive Officer. The agreement has an initial employment term of five years and automatically renews for consecutive one-year terms thereafter, subject to certain notice provision. The agreement provides for an annual base salary of $250,000, a performance bonus of up to 50% of the base salary based upon the achievement of certain target objectives, and discretionary merit bonus that can be awarded at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Mr. Crain will also be entitled to certain severance benefits upon his death, disability or termination of employment, as well as fringe benefits including participation in pension, profit sharing and bonus plans as applicable, and life insurance, hospitalization, major medical, paid vacation and expense reimbursement. The employment agreement contains standard and customary non-solicitation, non-competition, work made for hire, and confidentiality provisions.

On October 20, 2005, we issued an option to Mr. Crain to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock, 1,000,000 of which are exercisable at $0.50 per share and the balance of which are exercisable at $0.75 per share. The options have a term of 10 years and vest in equal annual installments over the five year period commencing on the date of grant.

In connection with our acquisition of Airgroup, on January 11, 2006 Airgroup entered into an employment agreement with William H. Moultrie to serve as the President of Airgroup. The agreement expires on June 30, 2009, provides for an annual base salary of $120,000, and an annual performance bonus equal to up to 25% of the annual base salary payable at the discretion of the board of directors of Airgroup. Mr. Moultrie is entitled to certain severance payments in the event he is terminated without cause and to certain fringe benefits including, participation in pension, profit sharing and bonus plans, as applicable, life insurance, hospitalization and major medical as are in effect, as well as paid vacation, and expense reimbursement. The agreement contains non competition and non solicitation covenants which prohibit Mr. Moultrie from participating in any activity that is competitive with our business or from soliciting any of our customers, employees or consultants until October 11, 2011. The agreement also contains standard and customary confidentiality and work made for hire provisions.

On January 11, 2005, we issued an option to Mr. Moultrie to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock exercisable at $0.44 per share. The options have a term of 10 years, vest in equal annual installments over the five year period commencing on the date of grant, and are otherwise subject to the terms of the Radiant Logistics, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, the material terms of which are described below.

Change in Control Arrangements

The options granted to Mr. Crain contain a change in control provision which is triggered in the event that we are acquired by merger, share exchange or otherwise, sell all or substantially all of our assets, or all of the stock of the Company is acquired by a third party (each, a “Fundamental Transaction”). In the event of a Fundamental Transaction, all of the options will vest and Mr. Crain shall have the full term of such Options in which to exercise any or all of them, notwithstanding any accelerated exercise period contained in any such Option. 

The employment agreement with Mr. Crain contains a change in control provision. If his employment is terminated following a change in control (other than for cause), then we must pay him a termination payment equal to 2.99 times his base salary in effect on the date of termination of his employment, any bonus to which he would have been entitled for a period of three years following the date of termination, any unpaid expenses and benefits, and for a period of three years provide him with all fringe benefits he was receiving on the date of termination of his employment or the economic equivalent. In addition, all of his unvested stock options shall immediately vest as of the termination date of his employment due to a change in control. A change in control is generally defined as the occurrence of any one of the following:

46

·  
any “Person” (as the term “Person” is used in Section 13(d) and Section 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), except for our chief executive officer, becoming the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of our securities representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of our then outstanding securities;

·  
a contested proxy solicitation of our stockholders that results in the contesting party obtaining the ability to vote securities representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of our then-outstanding securities;

·  
a sale, exchange, transfer or other disposition of 50% or more in value of our assets to another Person or entity, except to an entity controlled directly or indirectly by us;

·  
a merger, consolidation or other reorganization involving us in which we are not the surviving entity and in which our stockholders prior to the transaction continue to own less than 50% of the outstanding securities of the acquiror immediately following the transaction, or a plan involving our liquidation or dissolution other than pursuant to bankruptcy or insolvency laws is adopted; or

·  
during any period of twelve consecutive months, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board unless the election, or the nomination for election by our stockholders, of each new director was approved by a vote of at least a  majority of the directors then still in office who were directors at  the beginning of the period.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a “change in control” is not deemed to have occurred (i) in the event of a sale, exchange, transfer or other disposition of substantially all of our assets to, or a merger, consolidation or other reorganization involving, us and any entity in which our chief executive officer has, directly or indirectly, at least a 25% equity or ownership interest; or (ii) in a transaction otherwise commonly referred to as a “management leveraged buy-out.”
 
Directors’ Compensation

We do not have any standard arrangements regarding payment of any cash or other compensation to our current directors for their services as directors, as members of any committee of our board of directors or for any special assignments, other than to reimburse them for their cost of travel and other out-of-pocket costs incurred to attend board or committee meetings or to perform any special assignment on behalf of the Company.

Stock Incentive Plan
 
The Radiant Logistics, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, (the “Stock Incentive Plan”) covers 5,000,000 shares of common stock. Under its terms, employees, officers and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries are currently eligible to receive non-qualified stock options, restricted stock awards and, at such time as the Plan is approved by our stockholders, incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code. In addition, advisors and consultants who perform services for the Company or its subsidiaries are eligible to receive non-qualified stock options under the Stock Incentive Plan. The Stock Incentive Plan is administered by the Board of Directors or a committee designated by the Board of Directors.

47

All stock options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan are exercisable for a period of up to ten years from the date of grant and are subject to vesting as determined by the Board upon grant. We may not grant incentive stock options pursuant to the Stock Incentive Plan at exercise prices which are less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. The term of an incentive stock option granted under the Stock Incentive Plan to a stockholder owning more than 10% of the issued and outstanding common stock may not exceed five years and the exercise price of an incentive stock option granted to such stockholder may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. The Stock Incentive Plan contains certain limitations on the maximum number of shares of the common stock that may be awarded in any calendar year to any one individual for the purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.
 
As of the date of this prospectus, there are outstanding options to purchase 2,425,000 shares of common stock, 1,000,000 of which are exercisable at $0.50 per share, 1,000,000 of which are exercisable at $0.75 per share, and 425,000 of which are exercisable at $0.44 per share.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On January 11, 2006, Bohn H. Crain, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Stephen M. Cohen, our Secretary General Counsel and a Director, surrendered 5,712,500 and 1,904,166 shares of common stock, respectively, to the Company for cancellation.

On January 13, 2006 we entered into a five year employment agreement with Bohn H. Crain to serve as our Chief Executive Officer. On October 20, 2005 we issued options to Mr. Crain to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock. See “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION- Employment and Option Agreements” above.

On February 10, 2006, the Company reimbursed Radiant Capital Partners LLC (“Radiant Capital”), an affiliate of Bohn H. Crain, $75,000 for amounts Radiant Capital had paid on behalf of the Company for financial advisory services paid to a financial advisor.

SMC Capital Advisors, Inc., a legal and financial advisory firm owned by Stephen Cohen, our Secretary, General Counsel and Director, provided approximately $50,000 of outside legal services to the Company in connection with the acquisition of Airgroup.

48

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table indicates how many shares of our common stock were beneficially owned as of June 19, 2006, by (1) each person known by us to be the owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock, (2) our directors, (3) our executive officers, and (4) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. The address of each of the directors and executive officers listed below is c/o Airgroup, 1227 120th Avenue N.E., Bellevue, Washington 98005.

Name of
Beneficial Owner
  
Amount(1)
  
Percent of Class
         
Bohn H. Crain
  
7,500,000(2)
  
22.3%
Stephen M. Cohen
  
2,500,000(3)
  
7.4%
William H. Moultrie
  
113,637(4)
  
(*)
Millennium Global High Yield Fund Limited
64 St. James Street
London, U.K. SQ1A 1NF
  
2,875,000
  
8.5%
Michael Garnick
1528 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19102
 
2,300,000
  
6.8%
SPH Investments, Inc.
111 Presidential Blvd., Suite 165
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
  
2,068,182
  
6.2%
All officers and directors as a group (3 persons)
  
10,113,637
  
30.0%
         

 (*) Less than one percent
 
(1)  
The securities “beneficially owned” by a person are determined in accordance with the definition of “beneficial ownership” set forth in the rules and regulations promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and accordingly, may include securities owned by and for, among others, the spouse and/or minor children of an individual and any other relative who has the same home as such individual, as well as other securities as to which the individual has or shares voting or investment power or which such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of May 31, 2006 pursuant to the exercise of options, or otherwise. Beneficial ownership may be disclaimed as to certain of the securities. This table has been prepared based on 33,611,639 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 19, 2006.
   
(2)  
Consists of shares held by Radiant Capital Partners, LLC over which Mr. Crain has sole voting and dispositive power. Does not include 2,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options which are subject to vesting.
 
(3)  
Consists of shares held of record by Mr. Cohen’s wife over which he has sole voting and dispositive power.
 
(4)  
Does not include 50,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options which are subject to vesting.
 
49
 
DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE
 
The prices at which the shares of common stock covered by the Prospectus may actually be sold will be determined by the prevailing public market price for shares of common stock or by negotiations in private transactions.

SELLING SHAREHOLDERS
 
The table below sets forth the name of each person who is offering for resale shares of common stock covered by this prospectus, the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each person, the number of shares of common stock that may be sold in this offering, and the number of shares of common stock each person will own after the offering, assuming they sell all of the shares offered.

The shares of common stock included in this Prospectus were issued in the following private placement transactions, each of which was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as follows:

●
In October 2005, we issued an aggregate of 2,272,728 shares of our common stock to a limited number of accredited investors for gross cash consideration of $1.0 million.

●
In December, 2005, we issued 10,098,943 shares of our common stock to a limited number of accredited investors for gross cash proceeds of $4,440,000.

●
In January 2006, we issued 1,009,093 shares of our common stock to certain Airgroup shareholders and employees who are accredited investors for gross proceeds of $444,000.

●
In February 2006, we issued 1,466,697 shares of our common stock to a limited number of accredited investors for gross cash proceeds of $645,000.

Each of the foregoing private placements was completed at a purchase price of $0.44 per share.

Because the selling shareholders may offer all, some, or none of their shares of our common stock, we cannot provide a definitive estimate of the number of shares that the selling shareholders will hold after this offering.

Except as otherwise disclosed in the table below, none of the selling shareholders has at any time during the past three years acted as one of our employees, officers, or directors or otherwise had a material relationship with us, although up to 7,243,182 shares are being offered by a principal stockholders and 113,637 shares are being offered by the president of our Airgroup subsidiary. In addition, to our knowledge, none of the selling shareholders is associated with a broker-dealer.

For purposes of the following table, beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a selling shareholder and the percentage of ownership of that selling shareholder, shares of common stock issuable on exercise of options or warrants held by that selling shareholder that are convertible or exercisable, as the case may be, within 60 days of June 19, 2006, are included. Those shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other selling shareholder. The following table is based on 33,611,639 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 19, 2006.

 
Selling Shareholder
  
Shares beneficially
owned prior
to the offering
  
Number of common
common shares
registered in this
prospectus
  
Shares beneficially
owned after the
offering
  
   
Number
 
Percent
     
Number
 
Percent
 
Capital Growth Investment Trust
 
568,182
  
1.7%
 
568,182        
 
0
 
—
  
SPH Investments, Inc.(1)
 
2,068,182
  
6.2%
  
1,568,182        
  
500,000 
  
1.5%
  
David Stevenson
  
1,136,364
  
3.4%
  
1,136,364        
  
0
 
—
  
Stellar Capital Fund LLC
 
1,136,363
  
3.4%
  
1,136,363        
  
0
 
—
  
Strand Inc
  
1,200,000
  
3.6%
  
1,200,000        
  
0
 
—
  
Timothy Tatum   159,091  
*
 
159,091        
  
0
  
—
  
Leon Frankel
  
568,182
  
1.7%
  
568,182        
 
 
  
 
  
Michael Garnick(1)
  
2,300,000
  
6.8%
 
1,800,000        
 
500,000 
  
1.5%
  
                       
Frank DiLeonardo
  
100,000
  
*
 
100,000        
  
0
 
—
  
MoonlightInvestments Limited
 
600,000
  
1.8%
 
600,000        
  
0
 
—
  
Montex Exploration
 
200,000
  
*
 
200,000        
  
0
 
—
  
Gail Stevenson
  
225,000
  
*
 
225,000        
  
0
 
—
  
David Ishag
  
227,273
  
*
 
227,273        
  
0
 
—
  
Millennium Global High Yield Fund LTD (1)
  
2,875,000
  
8.5%
  
2,500,000        
  
375,000
  
1.1%
  
Ronnie Negus
  
292,125
  
*
 
292,125        
  
0
 
—
  
A.E. Daniel
  
100,000
  
*
 
100,000        
  
0
 
—
  
William H. Moultrie (2)
  
113,637
  
*
 
113,637        
  
0
 
—
  
James W. Reynolds
  
681,819
  
2.0%
  
681,819        
  
0
 
—
  
Rosie B. Moultrie
 
113,637
  
*
 
113,637        
  
0
 
—
  
Timothy Tatum
  
90,909
  
*
 
90,909        
  
0
 
—
  
Gordon Holtzinger
  
22,800
  
*
 
22,800        
  
0
 
—
  
Ryan Holtzinger
  
11,700
  
*
 
11,700        
  
0
 
—
  
Peter Alfe
  
20,000
  
*
 
20,000        
  
0
 
—
  
Michael A. Natelli
  
22,728
  
*
 
22,728        
  
0
 
—
  
Myra Hill
  
11,364
  
*
 
11,364        
  
0
 
—
  
David & Donna Rogers
  
11,364
  
*
 
11,364        
  
0
 
—
  
Richard Scaglione   45,455  
* 
   45,455          
0 
  
— 
  
Donna Kennedy   11,364  
* 
   11,364          
0
  
—
  
Aitor Urreta   113,637  
*
   113,637          
0 
  
—
  
David Klein
  
22,728
  
*
 
22,728        
  
0 
  
—
  
Gladys C. Levy
  
11,364
  
*
 
11,364        
  
0
 
—
  
Anthony P. Senato
  
22,728
  
*
 
22,728        
  
0
 
—
  
Tami E. Hamby
  
113,636
  
*
 
113,636        
  
0
 
—
  
Larry & Jane Naugle
  
11,364
  
*
 
11,364        
  
0
 
—
  
Johnny & Victoria Saied
  
11,364
  
*
 
11,364        
  
0
 
—
  
Greg Bruner
  
11,364
  
*
 
11,364        
  
0
 
—
  
John & Deborah Saied
  
22,728
  
*
 
22,728        
  
0
 
—
  
Sharon Hedeen
  
113,637
  
*
 
113,637        
  
0
 
—
  
Daniel Stegemoller
  
68,182
  
*
 
68,182        
  
0
 
—
  
Bruce Owens
  
113,636
  
*
 
113,636        
  
0
 
—
  
Peggy Chapman
  
12,000
  
*
 
12,000        
  
0
 
—
  
Robert O. Berry
  
34,091
  
*
 
34,091        
  
0
 
—
  
Frank J. & L. Ann Suraci
  
56,819
  
*
 
56,819        
  
0
 
—
  
Mary Ann Kish
  
22,728
  
*
 
22,728        
  
0
 
—
  
L. Ann Suraci
  
11,364
  
*
 
11,364        
  
0
 
—
  
Mary Lou Sperry
  
11,364
  
*
 
11,364        
  
0
 
—
  
Donna Mardo
  
11,364
  
*
 
11,364        
  
0
 
—
  
Steven McDonald
  
11,364
  
*
 
11,364        
  
0
 
—
  
William McCarthy
  
11,364
  
*
 
11,364        
  
0
 
—
  
Jocelyn Dorgan
  
11,819
  
*
 
11,819        
  
0
 
—
  
Jean Nostrand
  
20,000
  
*
 
20,000        
  
0
 
—
  
Harrell & Tracy Atkinson
  
11,364
  
*
 
11,364        
  
0
 
—
  
Ernest T. Kiefer
  
11,364
  
*
 
11,364        
  
0
 
—
  
Harry P. Gould
  
56,819
  
*
 
56,819        
  
0
 
—
  
Michael Gould
  
113,637
  
*
 
113,637        
  
0
 
—
  
Richard Vipond
  
11,364
  
*
 
11,364        
  
0
 
—
  
Pete Cahill
  
11,364
  
*
 
11,364        
  
0
 
—
  
James L. Conway
  
22,728
  
*
 
22,728        
  
0
 
—
  
William Busey
  
50,000
  
*
 
50,000        
  
0
 
—
  
Samuel H. Busey
  
45,000
  
*
 
45,000        
  
0
 
—
  
Adam Stern
  
113,637
  
*
 
113,637        
  
0
 
—
  
Kenneth & Maureen Drummond
  
12,000
  
*
 
12,000        
      
—
  
           
14,847,461        
          
                       
(1) A principal stockholder of the Company.
(2) The president of our Airgroup subsidiary.
 
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

The selling shareholders and any of their respective transferees, donees, assignees, and other successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or all of their shares of common stock on any stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private transactions. These sales may be at fixed or negotiated prices.

We have agreed, subject to certain limits, to bear all costs, expenses, and fees of registration of shares of our common stock offered by the selling shareholders for resale. However, any brokerage commissions, discounts, concessions, or other fees, if any, payable to broker-dealers in connection with any sale of shares of common stock will be borne by the selling shareholders selling those shares or by the purchasers of those shares.

On our being notified by a selling shareholder that any material arrangement has been entered into with a broker-dealer for the sale of shares through a block trade, special offering, exchange distribution, or secondary distribution, or a purchase by a broker or dealer, a supplement to this prospectus will be filed, if required, pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act, disclosing the following:

 
52

 
·
the name of each such selling shareholder and of any participating broker-dealer
 
·
the number of securities involved
 
·
the price at which such securities were sold
 
·
the commissions paid or discounts or concessions allowed to any broker-dealer, where applicable
 
·
that any broker-dealer did not conduct any investigation to verify the information set out or incorporated by reference in this prospectus
 
·
other facts material to the transaction.

The selling shareholders may use any one or more of the following methods when selling shares:

 
·
directly as principals or in ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers
 
·
block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;
 
·
purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account
 
·
an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange
 
·
privately negotiated transactions
 
·
short sales that are in compliance with the applicable laws and regulations of any state or the United States
 
·
broker-dealers may agree with the selling shareholders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share
 
·
a combination of any such methods of sale
 
·
any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law
 
The selling shareholders may also sell shares under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, if available, rather than under this prospectus.

Any sales of the shares may be effected through the OTC Bulletin Board, through any exchange on which our shares may be subsequently listed, in private transactions or otherwise, and the shares may be sold at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to prevailing market prices, or at negotiated prices.

The selling shareholders may also engage in short sales against the box, puts and calls, and other transactions in our securities or derivatives of our securities and may sell or deliver shares in connection with these trades. The selling shareholders may pledge their shares to their brokers under the margin provisions of customer agreements. If a selling shareholder defaults on a margin loan, the broker may, from time to time, offer and sell the pledged shares. We believe that the selling shareholders have not entered into any agreements, understandings or arrangements with any underwriters or broker-dealers regarding sale of their shares other than ordinary course brokerage arrangements, nor is there an underwriter or coordinating broker acting in connection with the proposed sale of shares by the selling shareholders.

Broker-dealers engaged by the selling shareholders may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales. If the selling shareholders effect sales through underwriters, brokers, dealers or agents, such firms may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling shareholders or the purchasers of the shares for whom they may act as agent, principal or both in amounts to be negotiated. Those persons who act as broker-dealers or underwriters in connection with the sale of the shares may be selected by the selling shareholders and may have other business relationships with, and perform services for, us. The selling shareholders do not expect these commissions and discounts to exceed what is customary in the types of transactions involved.

 
53

Any selling shareholder or broker-dealer who participates in the sale of the shares may be deemed to be an “underwriter” within the meaning of section 2(11) of the Securities Act. Any commissions received by any underwriter or broker-dealer and any profit on any sale of the shares as principal may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act.

The anti-manipulation provisions of Rules 101 through 104 of Regulation M promulgated under the Exchange Act may apply to purchases and sales of shares of common stock by the selling shareholders. In addition, there are restrictions on market-making activities by persons engaged in the distribution of the common stock. We have advised each selling shareholder that it may not use shares of common stock issuable on conversion of warrants and included in prospectus to cover short sales of common stock made prior to the date on which the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part has been declared effective.

Under the securities laws of certain states, the shares may be sold in those states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in certain states the shares may not be able to be sold unless our common stock has been registered or qualified for sale in that state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.

We are required to pay expenses incident to the registration, offering, and sale of the shares under this offering. We estimate that our expenses will total approximately $100,000. We have agreed to indemnify certain selling shareholders and certain other persons against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, and to contribute to payments to which those selling shareholders or their respective pledges, donees, transferees or other successors in interest may be required to make in respect thereof. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore, unenforceable.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
 
Common Stock
We are authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, of which 33,611,639 are outstanding as of the date of this prospectus.
 
Holders of common stock have equal rights to receive dividends when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors, out of funds legally available therefor. We have not declared any dividends, and we do not expect to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. Our ability to pay dividends is limited by the terms of our Bank of America, N.A. credit facility. Holders of common stock have one vote for each share held of record and do not have cumulative voting rights. Removal of directors requires the affirmative of holders of 75% of our outstanding shares and approval of amendments to our bylaws requires the affirmative vote of holders of two-thirds of our outstanding shares. Holders of common stock are entitled, upon liquidation of the Company, to share ratably in the net assets available for distribution, subject to the rights, if any, of holders of any preferred stock then outstanding. Shares of common stock are not redeemable and have no preemptive or similar rights.
 
 
54

Preferred Stock

We are authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share of which none are outstanding. Our board of directors has the authority, without further action by our stockholders, to issue shares of preferred stock in one or more series, and to fix, as to any such series, any dividend rate, redemption price, preference on liquidation or dissolution, sinking fund terms, conversion rights, voting rights, and any other preference or special rights and qualifications. Any or all of the rights and preferences selected by our board of directors may be greater than the rights of our common stock. The issuance of preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power of holders of common stock and the likelihood that holders of common stock will receive dividend payments and payments upon liquidation.

Anti-Takeover Provisions of Our Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws and Delaware Corporation Law

The following provisions of our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) may discourage takeover attempts of us that may be considered by some stockholders to be in their best interest. The effect of such provisions could delay or frustrate a merger, tender offer or proxy contest, the removal of incumbent directors, or the assumption of control by stockholders, even if such proposed actions would be beneficial to our stockholders.
 
Undesignated Preferred Stock
 
Our certificate of incorporation grants our board of directors the authority to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to fix the rights, preferences, qualifications and restrictions of the preferred stock. The issuance of preferred stock could, under certain circumstances, have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us if, for example, our board of directors designates and issues a series of preferred stock in an amount that sufficiently increases the number of outstanding shares to overcome a vote by the holders or our common stock or with rights and preferences that includes special voting rights to veto a change in control.
 
Removal of Directors
 
Our certificate of incorporation provides that members of our board of directors may be removed only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of 75% of the outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote in the election of our board of directors. This provision may discourage a third party from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us because it makes it more difficult for stockholders to replace a majority of our directors.
 
Advance Notice Requirements for Stockholder Nominations and Proposals
 
Our bylaws establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be brought before an annual meeting of our stockholders, including proposed nominations of persons for election to our board of directors. At an annual meeting, stockholders may only consider proposals or nominations specified in the notice of meeting or brought before the meeting by or at the direction of our board of directors. Stockholders may also consider a proposal or nomination by a person who was a stockholder of record on the record date for the meeting and who has given our secretary timely notice, in proper form, of his or her intention to bring that business before the meeting. These provisions may have the effect of precluding the conduct of business at a meeting if the proper procedures are not followed. These provisions may also discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.
 
 
55

Director Vacancies
 
Our bylaws provide that any vacancies in our board of directors resulting from death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal from office or other cause will be filled solely by the vote of our remaining directors. This provision may discourage a third party from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us because the provision effectively limits stockholder election of directors to annual and special meetings of the stockholders.
 
Amendments to Our Bylaws
 
Our certificate of incorporation provides that our bylaws may be amended only by the vote of a majority of our board of directors or by the vote of holders of at least two thirds of the outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote in the election of our board of directors. This provision may discourage a third party from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us because the provision makes it more difficult for stockholders to amend the provisions in our bylaws relating to advance notice and director vacancies.
 
Delaware Anti-Takeover Statute

We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”). In general, Section 203 of the DGCL prohibits a publicly-held Delaware corporation from engaging in a “business combination” with an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years after the date of the transaction through which the person became an interested stockholder, unless:

●
prior to the date of the transaction, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;
 
●
upon completion of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation at the time such transaction commenced, subject to certain exclusions; or
 
●
on or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the business combination is approved by the board of directors of the corporation and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two thirds of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder.

“Business combination” means a merger, asset sale and other transactions resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. “Interested stockholder” means a person who, together with his or her affiliates and associates, owns, or at any time within the three-year period prior to the date on which it is sought to be determined whether such person is an interested stockholder owned, 15% or more of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock.

 
56

EXPERTS

The audited financial statements as of December 31, 2005, and for the year then ended, and for the period from March 15, 2001 (date of inception) through December 31, 2005, were audited by Stonefield Josephson, Inc., and are included herein in reliance upon the authority of this firm as expert in accounting and auditing.

The audited financial statements for Airgroup Corporation as of June 30, 2005, and for the 2 years then ended, were audited by Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP, and are included herein in reliance upon the authority of this firm as expert in accounting and auditing.

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of our common stock offered hereby will be passed upon for us by Fox Rothschild LLP Princeton, New Jersey.

INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) provides that a Delaware corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that the person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of such corporation, or is or was serving at the request of such corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise. The indemnity may include expenses (including attorney’s fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with the action, suit or proceeding, provided such person acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the corporation’s best interests and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful. A similar standard of care is applicable in the case of actions by or in the right of the corporation, except that no indemnification may be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person will have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the court in which such action was brought determines that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all of the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for expenses that the court shall deem proper.
 
Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL provides that a Delaware corporation may, in its certificate of incorporation or an amendment thereto, eliminate or limit the personal liability of a director to a corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for violations of the director’s fiduciary duty of care, except: (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders; (ii) for actions or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; (iii) pursuant to Section 174 of the DGCL, which relates to unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock purchases or redemptions; or (iv) any transaction from which a director derived an improper personal benefit.

Our bylaws provide that we will indemnify and advance expenses to our directors, officers, employees and agents, and those serving at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise, to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL. The rights conferred in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws are not exclusive of any other right that an indemnified person may have or hereafter acquire under any statute, our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws, any agreement, any vote of stockholders or disinterested directors, or otherwise. Our certificate of incorporation prevents us from repealing or modifying any of these provisions to the extent such repeal or modification would adversely affect any right or protection of our directors existing at the time of such repeal or modification. In the event the DGCL is amended to further reduce or eliminate the personal liability of directors, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that the liability of each of our directors shall be reduced or eliminated to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL as so amended.

 
57

We are authorized to enter into indemnification agreements with our directors, officers, employees and agents, and those serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise, which may, in some cases, be broader than the specific indemnification provisions set forth in the DGCL. In addition, we are authorized to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of these persons to indemnify them for expenses and liabilities incurred by them by reason of their being or having been such a director, officer, employee or agent, regardless of whether we have the power to indemnify such persons against such expenses and liabilities under our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws, the DGCL, or otherwise.

These provisions may have the practical effect in certain cases of eliminating the ability of stockholders to collect monetary damages from directors or officers.

We believe that the limitation of liability, indemnification and insurance provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws are useful to attract and retain qualified officers, directors, employees and agents. No material litigation or proceeding involving any of our officers, directors, employees or agents is currently pending for which indemnification or advancement of expenses is being sought.

The effect of these indemnification provisions is to authorize such indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”) may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant the foregoing provisions or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
 
ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

This prospectus is part of a registration statement we filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. You should rely only on the information provided in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that contained in this prospectus. The selling security holders are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of common stock. Applicable SEC rules may require us to update this prospectus in the future. This preliminary prospectus is subject to completion prior to this offering.
 
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements, information statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). You may read and copy any report, statement or other information that we file with the SEC at the SEC Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain further information on the operation of the Public Reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. These SEC filings and other information regarding us are also available to the public at the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov, as well as our Internet site at www.radiant-logistics.com. Information contained on our web site does not constitute part of this prospectus.
 
 
58

This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we filed with the SEC. This prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement do not contain all of the information included in the registration statement, and certain statements contained in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement about the provisions or contents of any contract, agreement or any other document referred to herein are not necessarily complete. For each of these contracts, agreements or documents filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, we refer you to the actual exhibit for a more complete description of the matters involved. In addition, we have omitted certain parts of the registration statement in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. To obtain all of the information that we filed with the SEC in connection herewith, we refer you to the registration statement, including its exhibits and schedules. You should assume that the information contained in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement is accurate only as of the date appearing on the front of the prospectus or prospectus supplement, respectively.
 
As a company listed on the OTC Bulletin Board, we are not required to deliver an annual report to our shareholders. However, we intend to provide an annual report to our shareholders containing audited financial statements in connection with any annual meeting of shareholders that we hold.
 
 
59
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEX TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
(f/k/a GOLF TWO, INC.)
 
Interim period ended March 31, 2006 and 2005

F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-7

 
Years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004

F-16
F-17
F-18
F-19
F-20
F-21


Years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003

F-29
F-30
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34


AIRGROUP CORPORATION (AS A PREDECESSOR BUSINESS)

F-41
F-42
F-43
F-44
F-45

(UNAUDITED) PRO FORMA
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.

F-50
F-51
F-52
F-53

 
 
F-1
 

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

ASSETS
   
March 31,
   
December 31, 
  
 
    
2006
    
2005
  
   
(unaudited)
        
 
              
               
Current assets -
              
Cash and cash equivalents
  
$
730,613
  
$
5,266,451
  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance
    
6,622,257
    
-
 
for doubtful accounts of approximately $353,000
              
Other receivables
    
102,637
    
25,055
  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    
183,186
    
-
 
Total current assets
    
7,638,693
    
5,291,506
  
               
Goodwill and acquired intangibles, net
    
7,676,722
    
-
 
Furniture and equipment, net
    
242,103
    
-
 
Employee loan receivable
    
119,900
    
-
 
Investment in real estate
    
20,000
    
-
 
Deposits and other assets
    
55,602
    
15,907
  
   
$
15,753,020
  
$
5,307,413
  
               
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
              
               
Current liabilities -
              
Accounts payable
  
$
3,979,039
  
$
-
  
Accrued transportation costs
    
1,062,362
    
-
 
Commissions payable
    
249,586
    
-
 
Other accrued costs
    
536,013
    
148,388
  
Income taxes payable
    
1,009,135
    
-
 
Total current liabilities
    
6,836,135
    
148,388
  
               
               
Long term debt
    
1,781,070
    
-
 
Deferred tax liability
    
874,412
    
-
  
Total liabilities
    
9,491,617
    
148,388
  
               
Commitments & contingencies
    
-
    
-
  
               
Stockholders' equity:
              
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized;
              
no shares issued or outstanding
    
-
    
-
 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized;
              
33,611,639 issued and outstanding
    
15,067
    
12,590
  
Additional paid-in capital
    
6,615,719
    
5,488,707
  
Accumulated deficit
    
(369,383
)
  
(342,272
)
Total Stockholders’ equity
    
6,261,403
    
5,159,025
  
   
$
15,753,020
  
$
5,307,413
  
 
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
 

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
 
 
FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31,
 
     
2006
    
2005
 
Revenue
  
$
11,842,717
  
$
-
  
Cost of transportation
    
7,479,707
    
-
 
Net revenues
    
4,363,010
    
-
 
               
               
Agent Commissions
    
3,197,709
    
-
 
Personnel costs
    
639,087
    
-
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    
447,008
    
13,830
 
Depreciation and amortization
    
206,103
    
-
 
               
Loss from operations
    
(126,897
)
  
(13,830
)
               
Other income (expense):
              
Interest income
    
11,466
    
-
 
Interest expense
    
(13,324
)
  
(500
)
               
Loss before income tax expense (benefit)
    
(128,755
)
  
(14,330
)
 
              
Income tax expense (benefit)
    
(101,645
)
  
-
 
               
Net loss
  
$
(27,110
)
$
(14,330
)
               
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted
  
$
0.00
  
$
0.00
  
               
Weighted average basic and diluted
              
common shares outstanding
    
32,754,957
    
25,964,179
 



 
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


 



RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity


 
 
              
ADDITIONAL
          
TOTAL
  
 
    
COMMON STOCK
    
PAID-IN
    
ACCUMULATED
    
STOCKHOLDERS'
  
     
SHARES
    
AMOUNT
  
CAPITAL
    
DEFICIT
    
EQUITY
Balance at January 1, 2006
    
31,135,849
  
$
12,590
  
$
5,488,708
  
$
(342,273
)
$
5,159,025
  
 
                                
Issuance of common stock for cash
                                
at $0.44 per share (January 2006)(unaudited)
    
1,009,093
    
1,010
    
442,673
    
-
    
443,683
  
Issuance of common stock for cash
                                
at $0.44 per share (February 2006)(unaudited)
    
1,466,697
    
1,467
    
641,528
    
-
    
642,995
  
Share based compensation
    
-
    
-
    
42,810
    
-
    
42,810
  
Net loss for the three months ended
                               
March 31, 2006 (unaudited)
    
-
    
-
    
-
    
(27,110
)
  
(27,110
)
Balance at March 31, 2006
    
33,611,639
  
$
15,067
  
$
6,615,719
  
$
(369,383
)
$
6,261,403
  

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


 

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)


 
FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31,
  
     
2006
    
2005
  
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
              
Net loss
  
$
(27,110
)
$
(14,330
)
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET LOSS TO NET CASH
              
PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
              
non-cash contribution to capital (rent)
    
-
    
300
 
non-cash compensation expense (stock options)
    
42,810
    
-
 
amortization of intangibles
    
170,200
    
-
 
depreciation and amortization
    
(21,965
)
  
-
 
allowance for doubtful accounts
    
135,000
    
-
 
               
CHANGE IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES -
              
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    
1,672,183
    
-
 
accounts payable and accrued expenses
    
(2,223,497
)
  
4,247
  
Total adjustments
    
(225,269
)
  
4,457
  
Net cash provided by (used for)
             
operating activities
    
(252,379
)
  
(9,783
)
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
              
Acquisition of Airgroup, net of acquired cash (See Note 3)
    
(7,302,220
)
  
-
 
Proceeds from sale of investments
    
208,236
    
-
 
               
Net cash used for investing
    
(7,093,984
)
  
-
 
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
              
Proceeds from notes payable, stockholders
    
24,909
       
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    
1,086,679
    
-
 
Net proceeds from credit facility
    
1,281,070
    
-
 
Payment of credit facility fees
    
(57,224
)
  
-
 
Long term debt for acquisition
    
500,000
    
-
 
Net cash provided by financing activities
    
2,810,525
    
24,909
  
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
    
(4,535,838
)
  
15,126
  
CASH, BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD
    
5,266,451
    
19,487
  
CASH, END OF PERIOD
  
$
730,613
  
$
34,613
  
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
              
Income taxes paid
  
$
524,907
  
$
800
  
Interest paid
  
$
13,324
  
$
-
  


The accompanying notes form an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


 

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)


Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities:

In the first quarter of 2005, an officer of the Company provides office space to the Company for $100 per month on a month-to-month basis, which was recorded as a contribution to capital. Total office expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 amounted to $300.

On March 1, 2005, the Company was loaned $24,909 by a stockholder in exchange for a promissory note which was non-interest bearing. Interest was not imputed as the amount would be immaterial to the financial position at March 31, 2005 and results of operations over the 5 years of accretion.
 

 
 

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)



NOTE 1 - NATURE OF OPERATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
 
General

Radiant Logistics, Inc. (formerly known as “Golf Two, Inc”) (the “Company”) was formed under the laws of the state of Delaware on March 15, 2001 and from inception through the third quarter of 2005, the Company's principal business strategy focused on the development of retail golf stores. In October 2005, our management team consisting of Bohn H. Crain and Stephen M. Cohen completed a change of control transaction when they acquired a majority of the Company’s outstanding securities from the Company’s former officers and directors in privately negotiated transactions. In conjunction with the change of control transaction, we: (i) elected to discontinue the Company’s former business model; (ii) repositioned ourselves as a global transportation and supply chain management company; and (iii) changed our name to “Radiant Logistics, Inc.” to, among other things, better align our name with our new business focus.

Through the strategic acquisition of regional best-of-breed non-asset based transportation and logistics service providers, we intend to build a leading global transportation and supply-chain management company offering a full range of domestic and international freight forwarding and other value added supply chain management services, including order fulfillment, inventory management and warehousing.

Our strategy has been designed to take advantage of shifting market dynamics. The third party logistics industry continues to grow as an increasing number of businesses outsource their logistics functions to more cost effectively manage and extract value from their supply chains. Also, the industry is positioned for further consolidation as it remains highly fragmented, and as customers are demanding the types of sophisticated and broad reaching service offerings that can more effectively be handled by larger more diverse organizations.

Our acquisition strategy relies upon two primary factors: first, our ability to identify and acquire target businesses that fit within our general acquisition criteria, and second, the continued availability of capital and financing resources sufficient to complete these acquisitions. As to our first factor, following our recent acquisition of Airgroup Corporation (“Airgroup”), we have identified a number of additional companies that may be suitable acquisition candidates and are in preliminary discussions with a select number of them. As to our second factor, our ability to secure additional financing will rely upon the sale of debt or equity securities, and the development of an active trading market for our securities, neither of which can be assured.

Our growth strategy relies upon a number of factors, including our ability to efficiently integrate the businesses of the companies we acquire, generate the anticipated economies of scale from the integration, and maintain the historic sales growth of the acquired businesses in order to generate continued organic growth. There are a variety of risks associated with our ability to achieve our strategic objectives, including our ability to acquire and profitably manage additional businesses and the intense competition in our industry for customers and for the acquisition of additional businesses.

We accomplished the first step in our strategy by completing the acquisition of Airgroup effective as of January 1, 2006. Airgroup is a Seattle, Washington based non-asset based logistics company that provides domestic and international freight forwarding services through a network of 34 exclusive agent offices across North America. Airgroup services a diversified account base including manufacturers, distributors and retailers using a network of independent carriers and over 100 international agents positioned strategically around the world.
 
 
 
Prior to our acquisition of Airgroup, we operated as a development stage company under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 7. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X related to interim period financial statements and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position of the Company at March 31, 2006 and the Company’s consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2006 have been included. The results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. Reference should be made to the annual financial statements, including footnotes thereto, included in the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the SEC on March 17, 2006.


NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a)       Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates include revenue recognition, accruals for the cost of purchased transportation, accounting for stock options, the assessment of the recoverability of long-lived assets (specifically goodwill and acquired intangibles), the establishment of an allowance for doubtful accounts and the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the period that they are determined to be necessary. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

b)       Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less which are not securing any corporate obligations.

c)       Concentration

The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

d)       Goodwill

We follow the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 requires an annual impairment test for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, the first step of the impairment test requires that we determine the fair value of each reporting unit, and compare the fair value to the reporting unit's carrying amount. To the extent a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an indication exists that the reporting unit's goodwill may be impaired and we must perform a second more detailed impairment assessment. The second impairment assessment involves allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill as of the assessment date. The implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is then compared to the carrying amount of goodwill to quantify an impairment charge as of the assessment date. In the future, we will perform our annual impairment test effective as of April 1 of each year, unless events or circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred before that time.

e)       Long-Lived Assets
 
Acquired intangibles consist of customer related intangibles and non-compete agreements arising from our acquisitions. Customer related intangibles are amortized using accelerated methods over approximately 5 years and non-compete agreements are amortized using the straight line method over a 5 year period.

We follow the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which establishes accounting standards for the impairment of long-lived assets such as property, plant and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization. We review long-lived assets to be held-and-used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows over the remaining useful life of a long-lived asset is less than its carrying amount, the asset is considered to be impaired. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, we estimate fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

f)       Commitments

The company has operating lease commitments some of which are for office and warehouse space and are under non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through December 2010. Annual commitments, 2006 through 2010, respectively, are $76,000, $64,000, $64,000, $64,000, and $32,000 thereafter.

g)       Income Taxes
 
Taxes on income are provided in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the book values and the tax bases of particular assets and liabilities and the tax effects of net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided to offset the net deferred tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

h)       Revenue Recognition and Purchased Transportation Costs

We recognize revenue on a gross basis, in accordance with EITF 99-19, "Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net", as a result of the following: We are the primary obligor responsible for providing the service desired by the customer and are responsible for fulfillment, including the acceptability of the service(s) ordered or purchased by the customer. We, at our sole discretion, set the prices charged to our customers, and are not required to obtain approval or consent from any other party in establishing our prices. We have multiple suppliers for the services we sell to our customers, and have the absolute and complete discretion and right to select the supplier that will provide the product(s) or service(s) ordered by a customer, including changing the supplier on a shipment-by-shipment basis. In most cases, we determine the nature, type, characteristics, and specifications of the service(s) ordered by the customer. We also assume credit risk for the amount billed to the customer.
As a non-asset based carrier, we do not own transportation assets. We generate the major portion of our air and ocean freight revenues by purchasing transportation services from direct (asset-based) carriers and reselling those services to our customers. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 91-9 "Revenue and Expense Recognition for Freight Services in Process", revenue from freight forwarding and export services is recognized at the time the freight is tendered to the direct carrier at origin, and direct expenses associated with the cost of transportation are accrued concurrently. At the time when revenue is recognized on a transportation shipment, the Company records costs related to that shipment based on the estimate of total purchased transportation costs. The estimates are based upon anticipated margins, contractual arrangements with direct carriers and other known factors. The estimates are routinely monitored and compared to actual invoiced costs. The estimates are adjusted as deemed necessary by the Company to reflect differences between the original accruals and actual costs of purchased transportation.
 

i)       Share based Compensation

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 123R, "Share Based Payment: An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95" ("SFAS 123R"). This statement requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In addition, in March 2005 the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") released SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, "Share-Based Payment" ("SAB 107"). SAB 107 provides the SEC’s staff’s position regarding the application of SFAS 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations, and also provides the staff’s views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. Generally, the approach in SFAS 123R is similar to the approach described in SFAS 123. However, SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the statement of operations based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure of fair value recognition, as prescribed under SFAS 123, is no longer an alternative. The Company adopted statement 123R in October 2005 and does not believe the impact will be significant to the Company’s overall results of operations or financial position.


j)       Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share

The Company uses SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" for calculating the basic and diluted loss per share. Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. At March 31, 2006 and 2005, the outstanding number of potentially dilutive common shares totaled 35,179,957 and 25,964,179 shares of common stock, including options to purchase 2,425,000 shares of common stock at March 31, 2006. There were no options outstanding at March 31, 2005. As the Company has net losses, their effect is anti-dilutive for all periods presented and has not been included in the diluted weighted average earnings per share as shown on the Statements of Operations.
 
NOTE 3 - ACQUISITION OF AIRGROUP

In January of 2006, the Company acquired 100 percent of the outstanding stock of Airgroup Corporation (“Airgroup”). Airgroup is a Seattle, Washington based non-asset based logistics company that provides domestic and international freight forwarding services through a network of 34 exclusive agent offices across North America. Airgroup services a diversified account base including manufacturers, distributors and retailers using a network of independent carriers and over 100 international agents positioned strategically around the world. See the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2006 for additional information.

The transaction was valued at up to $14.0 million. This consists of: (i) $9.5 million payable in cash at closing (before giving effect for $2.8 million in acquired cash); (ii) an additional base payment of $0.6 million payable in cash on the one-year anniversary of the closing, provided at least 90% of Airgroup’s locations remain operational through the first anniversary of the closing (the “Additional Base Payment”); (iii) a subsequent cash payment of $0.5 million in cash on the two-year anniversary of the closing; (iv) a base earn-out payment of $1.9 million payable in Company common stock over a three-year earn-out period based upon Airgroup achieving income from continuing operations of not less than $2.5 million per year; and (v) as additional incentive to achieve future earnings growth, an opportunity to earn up to an additional $1.5 million payable in Company common stock at the end of a five-year earn-out period (the “Tier-2 Earn-Out”). Under Airgroup’s Tier-2 Earn-Out, the former shareholders of Airgroup are entitled to receive 50% of the cumulative income from continuing operations in excess of $15,000,000 generated during the five-year earn-out period up to a maximum of $1,500,000. With respect to the base earn-out payment of $1.9 million, in the event there is a shortfall in income from continuing operations, the earn-out payment will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis to the extent of the shortfall. Shortfalls may be carried over or carried back to the extent that income from continuing operations in any other payout year exceeds the $2.5 million level.
 
The acquisition, which provided the platform operation for the Company’s consolidation strategy, was accounted for as a purchase and accordingly, the results of operations and cash flows of Airgroup have been included in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements prospectively from the date of acquisition. At March 31, 2006 the total purchase price, including acquisition expenses of $104,030, but excluding the contingent consideration, was $10,104,030. The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the purchase price based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at January 1, 2006:
 

Current assets
  
$
11,412,049
  
Furniture and equipment
    
289,333
  
Other assets
    
399,251
  
Goodwill and other intangibles
    
7,846,922
  
Total acquired assets
    
19,947,555
  
         
Current liabilities assumed
    
8,911,245
  
Long term deferred tax liability
    
932,280
  
Total acquired liabilities
    
9,843,525
  
Net assets acquired
  
$
10,104,030
  
 
For the three months ending March 31, 2006, the Company recorded an expense of $170,200 from amortization of intangibles and an income tax benefit of $57,868 from amortization of the long term deferred tax liability; both arising from the acquisition of Airgroup. The Company expects the net reduction in income, from the combination of amortization of intangibles and long term deferred tax liability, will be $224,664 in a year in fiscal years 2006, $403,806 in 2007, $361,257 in 2008, $394,079 in 2009, in $318,862 in 2010, and $107,052 in 2011.

The company has not yet finalized the purchase price allocation as a result of its on-going review of the tax implications of the transaction which will be completed in the allotted period of time as required per SFAS 141.

The following information for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 (actual and unaudited) and March 31, 2005 (pro forma and unaudited) is presented as if the acquisition of Airgroup had occurred as of the beginning of the reporting period (in thousands, except earnings per share):


 
Three Months
ended March 31,
  
     
2006
    
2005
  
Total revenue
  
$
11,843
  
$
12,566
  
Loss from continuing operations
    
(127
)
  
(7
)
Net (loss)
    
(27
)
  
(6
)
Earnings per share:
              
Basic
  
$
0.00
  
$
0.00
  
 
 


NOTE 4 - LONG TERM DEBT

To complete the Airgroup acquisition and ensure adequate financial flexibility, the Company secured a $10,000,000 revolving credit facility (the "Facility") in January 2006. The Facility is collateralized by our accounts receivable and other assets of the Company and our subsidiaries. Advances under the Facility are available to fund future acquisitions, capital expenditures or for other corporate purposes. Borrowings under the facility bear interest, at our option, at prime minus 1.00% or LIBOR plus 1.55% and can be adjusted up or down during the term of the Facility based on our performance relative to certain financial covenants. The facility provides for advances of up to 75% of our eligible accounts receivable.


As of March 31, 2006, we had $300,752 in advances under the Facility along with $980,318 in outstanding checks which had not yet been presented to the bank for payment. These amounts in addition to $500,000 payable to the former shareholders of Airgroup total long term debt of $1,781,070.

At March 31, 2006, based on available collateral and $208,236 in outstanding letter of credit commitments, there was $3,256,775 available for borrowing under the Facility.

NOTE 5 - PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes are reported using the liability method. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

The Company accumulated a net federal operating loss carryforward of $342,272 from inception though its transition into the logistics business in January of 2006 which expires in 2025. Utilization of the net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards is subject to significant limitations imposed by the change in control under I.R.C. 382, limiting its annual utilization to the value of the Company at the date of change in control times the federal discount rate. A significant portion of the NOL may expire before it can be utilized. The Company is maintaining a valuation allowance of approximately $116,000 to off-set the deferred tax asset associated with these net operating losses until when, in the opinion of management, utilization is reasonably assured.

For the thee months ended March 31, 2006, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $57,868 related to the amortization of the deferred tax liability associated with the acquisition of Airgroup in accordance with FASB 109.
 
 
NOTE 6 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value at $.001 per share. As of March 31, 2005, none of the shares were issued or outstanding (unaudited).

Common Stock

In January 2006, we issued 1,009,093 shares of our common stock to certain Airgroup shareholders and employees who are accredited investors for gross proceeds of $444,000. In February 2006, we issued 1,466,697 shares of our common stock to a limited number of accredited investors for gross cash proceeds of $645,000. Each of these private placements was completed at a purchase price of $0.44 per share.

NOTE 7 - SHARE BASED COMPENSATION

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123R, “ Share Based Payment: An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95 ” (“SFAS 123R”). This statement requires that the cost resulting from all share based payment transactions be recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  In addition, in March 2005 the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) released SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, “ Share-Based Payment ” (“SAB 107”). SAB 107 provides the SEC staff’s position regarding the application of SFAS 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations, and also provides the staff’s views regarding the valuation of share based payment arrangements for public companies.  Generally, the approach in SFAS 123R is similar to the approach described in SFAS 123. However, SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the statement of operations based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure of fair value recognition, as prescribed under SFAS 123, is no longer an alternative.

The Company issued its first employee options in October of 2005 and adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAF123R concurrent with this initial grant.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2006, the Company issued employees options to purchase 425,000 shares of common stock at $0.44 per share. The options vest over a five year term.
Compensation cost recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2006 includes compensation cost for all share-based payments granted to date, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. No options have been exercised as of March 31, 2006.

The weighted average fair value of employee options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2006 was $0.35 per share. The fair value of options granted were estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following assumptions:

 
   
2006
  
Dividend yield
    
None
 
Expected volatility
    
117
%
Average risk free interest rate
    
3.73
%
Average expected lives
    
5.00 years
 

In accordance with SFAS123R, the Company is required to estimate the number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Due to the lack of historical information, the Company has not reduced its share based compensation costs for any estimated forfeitures. Estimated forfeitures will be reassessed in subsequent periods and may change based on new facts and circumstances.
 
 
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company recognized compensation costs of $42,810, in accordance with SFAS 123R.

NOTE 8 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In February 2006, the FASB has issued FASB Statement No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments. This standard amends the guidance in FASB Statements No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. Statement 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. Statement 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 155 to have any impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2006, the FASB decided to move forward with the issuance of a final FSP FAS 123R-4 “Classification of Options and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent Event” . The guidance in FSP FAS 123R-4 amends paragraphs 32 and A229 of FASB Statement No. 123R to incorporate the concept articulated in footnote 16 of FAS 123R. That is, a cash settlement feature that can be exercised only upon the occurrence of a contingent event that is outside the employee’s control does not meet the condition in paragraphs 32 and A229 until it becomes probable that the event will occur. Originally under FAS 123R, a provision in a share-based payment plan that required an entity to settle outstanding options in cash upon the occurrence of any contingent event required classification and accounting for the share based payment as a liability. This caused an issue under certain awards that require or permit, at the holder’s election, cash settlement of the option or similar instrument upon (a) a change in control or other liquidity event of the entity or (b) death or disability of the holder. With this new FSP, these types of cash settlement features will not require liability accounting so long as the feature can be exercised only upon the occurrence of a contingent event that is outside the employee’s control (such as an initial public offering) until it becomes probable that event will occur. The guidance in this FSP shall be applied upon initial adoption of Statement 123(R). An entity that adopted Statement 123(R) prior to the issuance of the FSP shall apply the guidance in the FSP in the first reporting period beginning after February 2006. Early application of FSP FAS 123R-4 is permitted in periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company does not expect that this new FSP will have any impact upon its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on Issue 05-6 , “ Determining the Amortization Period for Leasehold Improvements ”, which requires that leasehold improvements acquired in a business combination or purchased subsequent to the inception of a lease be amortized over the lesser of the useful life of the assets or a term that includes renewals that are reasonably assured at the date of the business combination or purchase. EITF 05-6 is effective for periods beginning after July 1, 2005. The Company does not expect the provisions of this consensus to have any impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No.154, “ Accounting Changes and Error Corrections ” (“SFAS 154”) which replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinions No. 20 “ Accounting Changes ” and SFAS No. 3, “ Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements - An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28 .” SFAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes retrospective application, for the latest practicable date, as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle and the reporting of a correction of an error. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 154 to have any impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Radiant Logistics, Inc.


We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Radiant Logistics, Inc. (a development stage company) (formerly Golf Two, Inc.) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from March 15, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Radiant Logistics, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended and from March 15, 2001 (inception), to December 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


/S/ Stonefield Josephson, Inc.



Los Angeles, California
March 3, 2006
 

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
(A Development Stage Entity- f/k/a/ Golf Two, Inc.)
Balance Sheets
 
ASSETS
  
           
   
December 31,
  
December 31,
  
   
2005
  
2004
  
Current assets -
         
cash and cash equivalents
  
$
5,266,451
  
$
19,487
  
other current assets
    
25,055
    
—
  
Total current assets
    
5,291,506
    
19,487
 
               
Other assets -
             
capitalized acquisition costs
    
15,907
    
—
  
   
$
5,307,413
  
$
19,487
  
               
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
               
Current liabilities -
              
accounts payable and accrued expenses
  
$
148,388
  
$
2,000
  
               
Notes Payable, Stockholders (Note 2)
    
—
    
50,000
  
Total liabilities
    
148,388
    
52,000
  
               
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
              
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding
    
—
    
—
  
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding: 31,135,849 and 25,964,179 shares at 2005 and 2004, respectively
    
12,590
    
7,418
  
Additional paid-in capital
    
5,488,707
    
153,307
  
Deficit accumulated during development stage
    
(342,272
)
  
(193,238
)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
    
5,159,025
    
(32,513
)
   
$
5,307,413
  
$
19,487
  
 
 
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
 
 
RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
(A Development Stage Entity - f/k/a/ Golf Two, Inc.)
Statements of Operations
 
           
FOR THE PERIOD
  
     
FROM MARCH 15,
  
   
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
  
2001 (INCEPTION)
  
 
2005
  
2004
  
TO DECEMBER 31, 2005
  
Net revenue
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
                     
General and administrative expenses
    
161,967
    
23,293
    
352,705
  
Loss from operations
    
(161,967
)
  
(23,293
)
  
(352,705
)
                     
Other income (expense):
                   
Interest Income
    
14,433
    
—
    
14,733
  
Interest expense
    
(1,500
)
  
(2,000
)
  
(4,300
)
Loss before provision for income taxes
    
(149,034
)
  
(25,293
)
  
(342,272
)
                     
Provision for income taxes
    
—
    
—
    
—
  
Net loss
  
$
(149,034
)
$
(25,293
)
$
(342,272
)
                     
Net loss per common share - basic and dilutive:
                    
Loss per common share
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
(0.01
)
                     
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and dilutive
    
26,490,427
    
25,964,179
    
22,375,245
  
 
 
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
 

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
(A Development Stage Entity - f/k/a/ Golf Two, Inc.)
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
 
               
DEFICIT
      
               
ACCUMULATED
      
           
ADDITIONAL
  
DURING
  
TOTAL
  
   
COMMON STOCK
  
PAID-IN
  
DEVELOPMENT
  
STOCKHOLDERS'
  
 
SHARES
  
AMOUNT
  
CAPITAL
  
STAGE
  
EQUITY (DEFICIT)
  
Balance at March 15, 2001, date of incorporation
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
                                 
Issuance of Founders Shares for services at $0.001 per share
(March 2001) (Reflects 3.5:1 Stock Split; Note 3)
    
8,137,500
    
2,325
    
—
    
—
    
2,325
  
Capital contribution for office space
    
—
    
—
    
1,500
    
—
    
1,500
  
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2001
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(14,303
)
  
(14,303
)
Balance at December 31, 2001
    
8,137,500
    
2,325
    
1,500
    
(14,303
)
  
(10,478
)
                                 
Issuance of common stock for services at $0.03 per share
(February 2002)
    
10,500,000
    
3,000
    
87,000
    
—
    
90,000
  
Issuance of common stock for cash at $0.03 per share (April 2002)
    
7,326,679
    
2,093
    
60,707
    
—
    
62,800
  
Capital contribution for office space and interest expense
    
—
    
—
    
1,400
    
—
    
1,400
  
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2002
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(123,572
)
  
(123,572
)
Balance at December 31, 2002
    
25,964,179
    
7,418
    
150,607
    
(137,875
)
  
20,150
  
                                 
Capital contribution for office space and interest expense
    
—
    
—
    
1,500
    
—
    
1,500
  
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2003
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(30,070
)
  
(30,070
)
Balance at December 31, 2003
    
25,964,179
    
7,418
    
152,107
    
(167,945
)
  
(8,420
)
                                 
Capital contribution for office space
    
—
    
—
    
1,200
    
—
    
1,200
  
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2004
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(25,293
)
  
(25,293
)
Balance at December 31, 2004
    
25,964,179
    
7,418
    
153,307
    
(193,238
)
  
(32,513
)
                                 
Issuance of common stock for cash at $0.44 per share
(October 2005)
    
2,272,728
    
2,273
    
983,949
    
—
    
986,222
 
Issuance of common stock for cash at $0.44 per share
(December 2005)
    
10,098,943
    
10,100
    
4,206,203
    
—
    
4,216,303
  
Issuance of common stock for services at $0.44 per share
(December 2005)
    
500,000
    
500
    
29,000
    
—
    
29,500
  
Surrender of common stock (Note:3) (December 2005)
    
(7,700,001
)
  
(7,701
)
  
7,701
    
—
    
—
  
Forgiveness of debt and related interest in connection with change of control (Note:2) (October 2005)
    
—
    
—
    
78,409
    
—
    
78,409
  
Capital contribution for office space
    
—
    
—
    
900
    
—
    
900
  
Compensation expense for stock options
    
—
    
—
    
29,238
    
—
    
29,238
 
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2005
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(149,034
)
  
(149,034
)
Balance at December 31, 2005
    
31,135,849
  
$
12,590
  
$
5,488,707
  
$
(342,272
)
$
5,159,025
  
 
 
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
 

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
(A Development Stage Entity - f/k/a/ Golf Two, Inc.)
Statements of Cash Flows
 
           
FOR THE PERIOD
  
           
FROM MARCH 15,
  
   
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
  
2001 (INCEPTION)
  
   
2005
  
2004
  
TO DECEMBER 31, 2005
  
             
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
              
Net loss
  
$
(149,034
)
$
(25,293
)
$
(342,272
)
                     
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET LOSS TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY
(USED FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
                    
non-cash issuance of common stock (services)
    
29,500
    
—
    
121,825
  
non-cash contribution to capital (rent)
    
900
    
1,200
    
6,500
  
non-cash compensation expense (stock options)
    
29,238
    
—
    
29,238
  
non-cash contribution to capital (interest)
    
3,500
    
—
    
3.500
  
                     
CHANGE IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES -
                    
other current assets
    
(25,054
)
  
—
    
(25,054
)
accounts payable and accrued expenses
    
146,387
    
(7,150
)
  
148,387
  
Total adjustments
    
184,471
    
(5,950
)
  
284,396
  
                     
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities
    
35,437
    
(31,243
)
  
(57,876
)
                     
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
                    
Capitalized acquisition costs
    
(15,907
)
  
—
    
(15,907
)
Net cash used for investing
    
(15,907
)
  
—
    
(15,907
)
                     
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
                    
Proceeds from notes payable, stockholders
    
24,909
    
—
    
84,909
  
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    
5,202,525
    
—
    
5,265,325
  
Payment on notes payable, stockholder
    
—
    
—
    
(10,000
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
    
5,227,434
    
—
    
5,340,234
  
                     
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
    
5,246,964
    
(31,243
)
  
5,266,451
  
CASH, BEGINNING OF YEAR
    
19,487
    
50,730
    
—
  
CASH, END OF YEAR
  
$
5,266,451
  
$
19,487
  
$
5,266,451
  
                     
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
                    
Income taxes paid
  
$
800
  
$
800
  
$
4,000
  
Interest paid
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-cash Financing Activities:

In April 2001, the Company entered into a $10,000 non-interest bearing note with a stockholder. The note was due upon demand and repaid in April 2002. The Company recorded $800 of interest expense on this note at 8% per annum as a contribution to capital for the period from March 15, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2002.

An officer of the Company provides office space to the Company for $100 per month on a month-to-month basis, which was recorded as a contribution to capital. Total office expense for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the period from March 15, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2004 amounted to $900, 1,200, and $6,200, respectively.

In March 15, 2001, the Company issued 2,325,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for services to incorporate the Company, totaling $2,325. The Founder Shares were valued at the par value of the Company's common stock, which represented its fair market value on the date of issuance.

In February 2002, 10,500,000 shares of common stock were issued at $0.03 per share in exchange for prior services rendered for a total of $90,000, which represented its fair market value on the date of issuance.

On November 5, 2003, the Company was loaned $50,000 by a stockholder in exchange for a promissory note. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the period from March 15, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2004, the Company recorded interest expense of $1,200, $2,000 and $3,500, respectively, related to this note.

On March 1, 2005, the Company borrowed $24,909 from a stockholder in exchange for a non-interest bearing promissory note with principal due and payable in five years.

In October of 2005, and in conjunction with the change in control transaction, stockholders agreed to discharge $78,409 in notes and accumulated interest.

In December of 2005, 500,000 shares of common stock were issued to a financial advisor for financial advisory and investment banking services provided in connection with, among other things, our transition to a third-party logistics company at a price $0.44 per share.

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
 

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF OPERATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
 
Radiant Logistics, Inc., formerly known as Golf Two, Inc. (the "Company"), is currently a development stage company under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 7 and was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on March 15, 2001. Since inception, the Company planned to operate retail golf stores, however, in October 2005, in conjunction with a change in control transaction, the Company discontinued its former business model with the intention to reposition itself as a non-asset based transportation and supply chain management company. The Company completed the first phase of its business strategy completing the acquisition of Airgroup Corporation effective January 1, 2006. (See Note 5). As a result, through the 2005 calendar year, the Company had not produced revenues since inception and will continue to report as a development stage company through December 31, 2005.
 
The financial statements have been prepared by the Company, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments). Which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly represent the operating results for the respective periods.
 
Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less which are not securing any corporate obligations.

Concentration

The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The company accounts for comprehensive income in accordance with SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” which requires comprehensive income and its components to be reported when a company has items of comprehensive income.  Comprehensive income includes net income plus other comprehensive income (i.e. certain revenues, expenses, gains, and losses reported as separate components of stockholders’ equity rather than in net income).  The Company has no items that represent other comprehensive income and, therefore has not included a schedule of other comprehensive income in these financial statements.

Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) per Share

The Company uses SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" for calculating the basic and diluted loss per share. Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the outstanding number of potentially dilutive common shares totaled 31,135,849 and 25,964,179 shares of common stock, including options to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock as December 31, 2005. There were no options outstanding at December 31, 2004. As the Company has net losses, their effect is anti-dilutive for all periods presented and has not been included in the diluted weighted average earnings per share as shown on the Statements of Operations.
 

Provision for Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under SFAS 109,"Accounting for Income Taxes." Under the asset and liability method of SFAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under SFAS 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The estimated fair values of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses, none of which are held for trading purposes, approximate their carrying value because of the short term maturity of these instruments.

Stock -Based Compensation
 
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 123R, "Share Based Payment: An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95" ("SFAS 123R"). This statement requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In addition, in March 2005 the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") released SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, "Share-Based Payment" ("SAB 107"). SAB 107 provides the SEC’s staff’s position regarding the application of SFAS 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations, and also provides the staff’s views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. Generally, the approach in SFAS 123R is similar to the approach described in SFAS 123. However, SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the statement of operations based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure of fair value recognition, as prescribed under SFAS 123, is no longer an alternative.
 
The Company issued its first employee options in October of 2005 granting an option to Mr. Crain to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock, 1,000,000 of which are exercisable at $0.50 per share and the balance of which are exercisable at $0.75 per share. The options vest over a five year term. Concurrent with this initial grant, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS123R. Compensation cost recognized during the three months ended December 31, 2005 includes compensation cost for all share-based payments granted to date, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. No options have been exercised as of December 31, 2005.
 
The weighted average fair value of employee options granted during 2005 was $0.35. The fair value of options granted were estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following assumptions:

 
2005
  
Dividend yield
    
None
  
Expected volatility
    
117
%
Average risk free interest rate
    
3.75
%
Average expected lives
    
5.00 years
  
 
For the three months and year ended December 31, 2005, the Company recognized compensation costs of $29,238, as a result of the adoption of SFAS 123R.
 
 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151 "Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. The amendments made by Statement 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after November 23, 2004. The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of SFAS 151, and does not believe the impact will be significant to the Company's overall results of operations or financial position.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.152, "Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions--an amendment of FASB Statements No. 66 and 67" ("SFAS 152) The amendments made by Statement 152 This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, to reference the financial accounting and reporting guidance for real estate time-sharing transactions that is provided in AICPA Statement of Position (SOP) 04-2, Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions. This Statement also amends FASB Statement No. 67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, to state that the guidance for (a) incidental operations and (b) costs incurred to sell real estate projects does not apply to real estate time-sharing transactions. The accounting for those operations and costs is subject to the guidance in SOP 04-2. This Statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of SFAS 152, and does not believe the impact will be significant to the Company's overall results of operations or financial position.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions."The amendments made by Statement 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with a broader exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. Previously, Opinion 29 required that the accounting for an exchange of a productive asset for a similar productive asset or an equivalent interest in the same or similar productive asset should be based on the recorded amount of the asset relinquished. Opinion 29 provided an exception to its basic measurement principle (fair value) for exchanges of similar productive assets. The Board believes that exception required that some nonmonetary exchanges, although commercially substantive, be recorded on a carryover basis. By focusing the exception on exchanges that lack commercial substance, the Board believes this Statement produces financial reporting that more faithfully represents the economics of the transactions. The Statement is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after the date of issuance. The provisions of this Statement shall be applied prospectively. The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of SFAS 153, and does not believe the impact will be significant to the Company's overall results of operations or financial position.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment". Statement 123(R) will provide investors and other users of financial statements with more complete and neutral financial information by requiring that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. Statement 123(R) covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. Statement 123(R) replaces FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Statement 123, as originally issued in 1995, established as preferable a fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. However, that Statement permitted entities the option of continuing to apply the guidance in Opinion 25, as long as the footnotes to financial statements disclosed what net income would have been had the preferable fair-value-based method been used. Public entities (other than those filing as small business issuers) will be required to apply Statement 123(R) as of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. The Company adopted Statement 123(R) in December of 2005.
 

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued two FASB Staff Positions - FSP FAS 109-1, Application of FASB Statement 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes" to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and FSP FAS 109-2 Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. Neither of these affected the Company as it does not participate in the related activities.

In March 2005, the SEC released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, “Share-Based Payment” (“SAB 107”), which provides interpretive guidance related to the interaction between SFAS 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations. It also provides the SEC staff’s views regarding valuation of share-based payment arrangements. In April 2005, the SEC amended the compliance dates for SFAS 123(R), to allow companies to implement the standard at the beginning of their next fiscal year, instead of the next reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005. Management is currently evaluating the impact SAB 107 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations” (“FIN 47”). FIN 47 provides guidance relating to the identification of and financial reporting for legal obligations to perform an asset retirement activity. The Interpretation requires recognition of a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability’s fair value can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 also defines when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. The provision is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The Company will adopt FIN 47 beginning the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 and does not believe the adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2005, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” This new standard replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes, and FASB Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements,” and represents another step in the FASB’s goal to converge its standards with those issued by the IASB. Among other changes, Statement 154 requires that a voluntary change in accounting principle be applied retrospectively with all prior period financial statements presented on the new accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to do so. Statement 154 also provides that (1) a change in method of depreciating or amortizing a long-lived non-financial asset be accounted for as a change in estimate (prospectively) that was effected by a change in accounting principle, and (2) correction of errors in previously issued financial statements should be termed a “restatement.” The new standard is effective for accounting changes and correction of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Early adoption of this standard is permitted for accounting changes and correction of errors made in fiscal years beginning after June 1, 2005. The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of Statement 154 and does not believe the impact will be significant to the Company's overall results of operations or financial position.

In February of 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments”, which is intended to simplify the accounting and improve the financial reporting of certain hybrid financial instruments (i.e., derivatives embedded in other financial instruments). The statement amends SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, and SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities—a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125.” SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments issued or acquired after the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006.. The Company is currently evaluating the impact SFAS No. 155 will have on its consolidated financial statements, if any.
 
NOTE 2 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
Office Space

Prior to the change of control transaction, a stockholder of the Company provided office space to the Company at $100 per month on a month-to-month basis, which was recorded as a contribution to capital. Total office expense for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 amounted to $900 and $1,200, respectively, and for the period from March 15, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2005 amounted to $6,200.
 

Notes Payable, Stockholders

On November 5, 2003, the Company borrowed $50,000 from a stockholder in exchange for a promissory note with principal due and payable on November 5, 2008 and interest payable on the unpaid balance at 4% per annum. During October of 2005 and in conjunction with the change in control transaction, the stockholder to whom the Company owed the $50,000 note and $3,500 in accrued interest agreed to cancel the note and discharge all such indebtedness which is reflected as additional equity contributions to capital. Total interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 amounted to $1,500 and $2,000, respectively, and for the period from March 15, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2005 amounted to $3,500.

On March 1, 2005, the Company borrowed $24,909 from a stockholder in exchange for a non-interest bearing promissory note with principal due and payable in five years. During October of 2005 and in conjunction with the change in control transaction, the stockholder to whom the Company owed the $24,909 note agreed to cancel the note and discharge all such indebtedness which is reflected as additional equity contributions to capital.

Change of Control Transaction

On October 18, 2005, Bohn H. Crain and Stephen M. Cohen acquired 17,616,666 shares of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock (constituting 67.9% of the Company’s outstanding shares) in privately negotiated purchases from the former officers and directors of the Company. Mr. Crain (through a control affiliate) acquired an aggregate of 13,212,500 shares from Mr. David Bennett and Mr. Daniel Bernstein for total consideration of $18,149. Mr. Cohen (through an affiliate) acquired 4,404,166 shares from Mr. Bernstein for total consideration of $6,050. Mr. Crain and Mr. Cohen used personal funds in order to purchase the shares from Mr. Bennett and Mr. Bernstein. The number of shares purchased gives effect to the stock dividend paid on October 21, 2005 discussed in Note 3.

NOTE 3 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value at $.001 per share. As of December 31, 2005, none of the shares were issued or outstanding.

Common Stock

In March 2001, the Company issued 19,775,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for services to incorporate the Company. In February 2002, the Board of Directors declared that the Company had not received consideration for the issuance of 11,637,500 of the previously issued shares and canceled those shares leaving 8,137,500 shares outstanding totaling $2,325. The forgoing shares (before the 3.5:1 stock split) were valued at the par value of the Company's common stock, which represented the fair market value of such shares on the date of issuance. The Company has not recognized the issuance of the cancelled shares in the financial statements.

In February 2002, 10,500,000 shares of common stock were issued in exchange for prior services rendered for a total of $90,000, which represented the fair market value of such shares on the date of issuance.

In April 2002, the Company completed a private placement and issued 7,326,679 shares of its common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of $62,800.

In September 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a 3.5 for 1 split of its issued and outstanding common stock which was effectuated through a dividend of 2.5 shares for each share of common stock outstanding as of the record date. The dividend was payable on October 21, 2005 to shareholders of record on October 20, 2005. The stock split has been reflected in the Company’s financial statements for all periods presented. The common stock will continue to have a par value of $0.001 per share. Fractional shares were rounded upward.
 

In October 2005, the Company completed a private placement and issued 2,272,728 shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.44 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,000,000. This placement yielded net proceeds of $986,222 for the Company, after the payment of out-of-pocket costs associated with the placement.

In December, 2005, the Company completed a private placement and issued 10,098,943 shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.44 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $4.4 million. This placement yielded net proceeds of $4.2 million for the Company, after the payment of placement agent fees and other out-of-pocket costs associated with the placement.

In December, 2005, a total of 7,700,001 shares of common stock were surrendered to the Company for cancellation, including 5,712,500 shares surrendered by Bohn H. Crain our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors and 1,904,166 shares surrendered by Stephen M. Cohen, our Secretary General Counsel and a Director.

In December, 2005, the Company issued 500,000 shares of its common stockat a price of $0.44 per share in exchange for financial advisory and investment banking services provided in connection with, among other things, our transition to a third-party logistics.

NOTE 4 - PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
 
Deferred income taxes are reported using the liability method. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
 
As of December 31, 2005, the Company had a net federal operating loss carryforward of $342,272, expiring in 2025. Utilization of the net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards is subject to significant limitations imposed by the change in control under I.R.C. 382, limiting its annual utilization to the value of the Company at the date of change in control times the federal discount rate. A significant portion of the NOL may expire before it can be utilized. 
 
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the valuation allowance increased by $149,034. Deferred tax assets resulting from the net operating losses are reduced by a valuation allowance, when, in the opinion of management, utilization is not reasonably assured.

A summary is as follows:

Net operating loss carryforward
  
$
342,272
  
Effective tax rate
    
34
%
         
Deferred tax asset
    
116,372
  
Valuation allowance
    
(116,372
)
Net deferred tax asset
  
$
—
  



NOTE 5 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Acquisition of Airgroup Corporation

In January of 2006, the Company acquired 100 percent of the outstanding stock of Airgroup Corporation (“Airgroup”). Airgroup is a Seattle, Washington based non-asset based logistics company that provides domestic and international freight forwarding services through a network of 34 exclusive agent offices across North America. Airgroup services a diversified account base including manufacturers, distributors and retailers using a network of independent carriers and over 100 international agents positioned strategically around the world. See the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2006 for additional information.

The transaction was valued at up to $14.0 million. This consists of: (i) $9.5 million payable in cash at closing; (ii) an additional base payment of $0.6 million payable in cash on the one-year anniversary of the closing, provided at least 90% of Airgroup’s locations remain operational through the first anniversary of the closing (the “Additional Base Payment”); (iii) a subsequent cash payment of $0.5 million in cash on the two-year anniversary of the closing; (iv) a base earn-out payment of $1.9 million payable in Company common stock over a three-year earn-out period based upon Airgroup achieving income from continuing operations of not less than $2.5 million per year; and (v) as additional incentive to achieve future earnings growth, an opportunity to earn up to an additional $1.5 million payable in Company common stock at the end of a five-year earn-out period (the “Tier-2 Earn-Out”). Under Airgroup’s Tier-2 Earn-Out, the former shareholders of Airgroup are entitled to receive 50% of the cumulative income from continuing operations in excess of $15,000,000 generated during the five-year earn-out period up to a maximum of $1,500,000. With respect to the base earn-out payment of $1.9 million, in the event there is a shortfall in income from continuing operations, the earn-out payment will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis to the extent of the shortfall. Shortfalls may be carried over or carried back to the extent that income from continuing operations in any other payout year exceeds the $2.5 million level.

The following unaudited pro forma information is presented as if the acquisition of Airgroup had occurred on January 1, 2004 (in thousands, except earnings per share):
 
   
Year ended December 31,
  
 
2005
  
2004
  
Total revenue
  
$
53,871
  
$
47,246
  
Income from continuing operations
    
1,466
    
1,676
  
Net income
    
862
    
991
  
Earnings per share:
              
Basic
  
$
0.03
  
$
0.04
  
Diluted
  
$
0.03
  
$
0.04
  
 
In January of 2006, the Company entered into a $10.0 million secured credit facility with Bank of America, N.A with a term of two years (the “Facility”). The Facility is collateralized by the Company’s accounts receivable and other assets of the Company and its subsidiaries. Advances under the Facility are available to fund future acquisitions, capital expenditures or for other corporate purposes. Borrowings under the facility bear interest, at the Company’s option, at prime (7.25% at December 31, 2005) minus 1.00% or LIBOR (4.39% at December 31, 2005) plus 1.55% and can be adjusted up or down during the term of the Facility based on the Company’s performance relative to certain financial covenants. The facility provides for advances of up to 75% of the Company’s eligible accounts receivable.

In January of 2006, the Company issued 1,009,093 shares of its common stock to a limited number of Airgroup shareholders and employees for aggregate gross proceeds of $444,000; from which no underwriting discounts or commissions were paid.

In February 2006, the Company issued 1,466,697 shares of its common stock to a limited number of Airgroup exclusive sales agents and their employees, key Airgroup employees and a limited number of other investors for aggregate gross proceeds of $645,000; from which no underwriting discounts or commissions were paid.
 

Employment Agreements

On January 11, 2006 Airgroup entered into an employment agreement with William H. Moultrie to serve as the President of Airgroup through June 30, 2009.

On January 13, 2006 the Company entered into an employment agreement with Bohn H. Crain to serve as our Chief Executive Officer through January 10, 2011.

Other Reimbursements

On February 10, 2006, the Company reimbursed Radiant Capital Partners LLC (“Capital Partners”), a control affiliate of Bohn H. Crain, $75,000 for amounts Capital Partners had paid on behalf of the Company for financial advisory services.
 
 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
Board of Directors
Golf Two, Inc.
Newport Beach, California
 
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Golf Two, Inc. (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2004 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for the period from March 15, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Golf Two, Inc. (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for the period from March 15, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the accompanying financial statements, the Company has no established source of revenue, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plan in regard to these matters is also discussed in Note 1. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
 
/s/ Stonefield Josephson, Inc.
 
Santa Monica, California
February 17, 2005
 
 
GOLF TWO, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
BALANCE SHEET - DECEMBER 31, 2004

ASSETS
  
     
CURRENT ASSETS -
      
cash and cash equivalents
 
$
19,487
  
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES -
        
accrued interest
  
$
2,000
  
Note payable, related party
    
50,000
  
         
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
        
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding
    
—
  
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 25,964,179 issued and outstanding
    
7,418
  
Additional paid-in capital
    
153,307
  
Deficit accumulated during development stage
    
(193,238
)
     
(32,513
)
 
$
19,487
  
 
 
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
 
 
GOLF TWO, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

           
FOR THE PERIOD
  
   
FOR THE YEAR
  
FROM MARCH 15,
  
   
ENDED DECEMBER 31,
  
2001 (INCEPTION)
  
 
2004
  
2003
  
TO DECEMBER 31, 2004
  
               
NET REVENUE
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
    
23,293
    
29,828
    
190,738
  
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
    
(23,293
)
  
(29,828
)
  
(190,738
)
                     
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
                    
Interest income
    
—
    
58
    
300
  
Interest expense
    
(2,000
)
  
(300
)
  
(2,800
)
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
    
(25,293
)
  
(30,070
)
  
(193,238
)
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
    
—
    
—
    
—
  
NET LOSS
  
$
(25,293
)
$
(30,070
)
$
(193,238
)
NET LOSS AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
                    
PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTIVE:
                    
Loss per common share
  
$
(0.00
)
$
(0.00
)
$
(0.03
)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and dilutive
    
25,964,179
    
25,964,179
    
21,292,302
  
 
 
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
 
 
GOLF TWO, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
 
               
DEFICIT
      
               
ACCUMULATED
      
           
ADDITIONAL
  
DURING
  
TOTAL
  
   
COMMON STOCK
  
PAID-IN
  
DEVELOPMENT
  
STOCKHOLDERS'
  
   
SHARES
  
AMOUNT
  
CAPITAL
  
STAGE
  
EQUITY (DEFICIT)
  
                       
Balance at March 15, 2001, date of incorporation
    
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
                                 
Issuance of Founders Shares for services at $0.001 per share
(March 2001)
    
8,137,500
    
2,325
    
—
    
—
    
2,325
  
Capital contribution for office space
    
—
    
—
    
1,500
    
—
    
1,500
  
Net loss
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(14,303
)
  
(14,303
)
Balance at December 31, 2001
    
2,325,000
    
2,325
    
1,500
    
(14,303
)
  
(10,478
)
                                 
Issuance of common stock for services at $0.03 per share
(February 2002)
    
10,500,000
    
3,000
    
87,000
    
—
    
90,000
  
Issuance of common stock for cash at $0.03 per share
(April 2002)
    
7,326,679
    
2,093
    
60,707
    
—
    
62,800
  
Capital contribution for office space and interest expense
    
—
    
—
    
1,400
    
—
    
1,400
  
Net loss
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(123,572
)
  
(123,572
)
Balance at December 31, 2002
    
7,418,336
    
7,418
    
150,607
    
(137,875
)
  
20,150
  
                                 
Capital contribution for office space and interest expense
    
—
    
—
    
1,500
    
—
    
1,500
  
Net loss
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(30,070
)
  
(30,070
)
Balance at December 31, 2003
    
7,418,336
    
7,418
    
152,107
    
(167,945
)
  
(8,420
)
                                 
Capital contribution for office space
    
—
    
—
    
1,200
    
—
    
1,200
  
Net loss
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(25,293
)
  
(25,293
)
Balance at December 31, 2004
    
25,964,179
  
$
7,418
  
$
153,307
  
$
(193,238
)
$
(32,513
)
 
 
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
 
 
GOLF TWO, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
           
FOR THE PERIOD
  
   
FOR THE YEAR
  
FROM MARCH 15,
  
   
ENDED DECEMBER,
  
2001 (INCEPTION)
  
   
2004
  
2003
  
TO DECEMBER 31, 2004
  
               
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
              
Net loss
  
$
(25,293
)
$
(30,070
)
$
(193,238
)
                     
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET LOSS TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
                    
Non-cash issuance of common stock for services
    
—
    
—
    
92,325
  
Non-cash contribution to capital
    
1,200
    
1,500
    
5,600
  
                     
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN LIABILITIES -
                    
accounts payable and accrued expenses
    
(7,150
)
  
2,150
    
2,000
  
Total adjustments
    
(5,950
)
  
3,650
    
99,925
  
                     
Net cash used for operating activities
    
(31,243
)
  
(26,420
)
  
(93,313
)
                     
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
                    
Proceeds from note payable-related party
    
—
    
50,000
    
60,000
  
Payments on note payable-related party
    
—
    
—
    
(10,000
)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    
—
    
—
    
62,800
  
Net cash provided by financing activities
    
—
    
50,000
    
112,800
  
                     
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
    
(31,243
)
  
23,580
    
19,487
  
CASH, beginning of year
    
50,730
    
27,150
    
—
  
CASH, END OF YEAR
  
$
19,487
  
$
50,730
  
$
19,487
  
                     
                     
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
                    
Income taxes paid
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
Interest paid
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

In April 2001, the Company entered into a $10,000 non-interest bearing note with a stockholder. The note was due upon demand and repaid in April 2002. The Company recorded $800 of interest expense on this note at 8% per annum as a contribution to capital for the period from March 15, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2002.

An officer of the Company provides office space to the Company for $100 per month on a month-to-month basis, which was recorded as a contribution to capital. Total office expense for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for the period from March 15, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2004 amounted to $1,200, 1,200, and $5,300, respectively.

In March 15, 2001, the Company issued 2,325,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for services to incorporate the Company, totaling $2,325. The Founder Shares were valued at the par value of the Company's common stock, which represented its fair market value on the date of issuance.

In February 2002, 3,000,000 shares of common stock were issued at $0.03 per share in exchange for prior services rendered for a total of $90,000, which represented its fair market value on the date of issuance.

On November 5, 2003, the Company was loaned $50,000 by a stockholder in exchange for a promissory note. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for the period from March 15, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2004, the Company recorded interest expense of $2,000, $300 and $2,300, respectively, related to this note.
 
 
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
 
 
GOLF TWO, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003 AND PERIOD FROM MARCH 15, 2001
(INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2004
 
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
 
NATURE OF BUSINESS:
 
Golf Two, Inc. (the "Company") is currently a development stage company under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 7 and was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on March 15, 2001. The Company plans to operate retail golf stores that will feature indoor golf instruction and sell custom golf clubs throughout California. As of December 31, 2004, the Company has not produced revenues since inception and will continue to report as a development stage company until significant revenues are produced.
 
BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
 
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, the Company has no established source of revenue and, without realization of additional capital, it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern. This matter raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
 
Management recognizes that the Company must generate additional resources to enable it to continue operations. Management intends to continue to raise additional financing through debt financing and equity financing or other means and interests that it deems necessary, with a view to moving forward and sustaining a prolonged growth in its strategy phases. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in raising additional capital. Furthermore, there can be no assurance, assuming the Company successfully raises additional equity, that the Company will achieve profitability or positive cash flow. If management is unable to raise additional capital and expected significant revenues do not result in positive cash flow, the Company will not be able to meet its obligations and may have to cease operations.
 
The Company's expenses will significantly increase as it begins to implement its business plan and currently has no source of revenue. Management hopes that the Company's initial source of revenue will be sales from its proposed website. On November 5, 2003, the Company entered into a promissory note for $50,000 with one of its shareholders, payable by November 5, 2008, at the rate of 4% per year calculated yearly, in order to engage a web developer. However, management estimates that its proposed website will not be operational until the second quarter of 2005 at the earliest. Management's plans to establish a operational website have been hindered by its inability to raise the necessary funds. Management hopes that, once operational, the website will become a source of revenue to the Company.
 
 
GOLF TWO, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003 AND PERIOD FROM MARCH 15, 2001
(INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2004
 
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED:
 
BASIS OF PRESENTATION, CONTINUED:
 
Subsequently, the Company plans to locate and begin developing its first brick and mortar retail location, which management anticipates will not occur before the fourth quarter of 2005 at the earliest. Management's plans to establish a brick and mortar retail location have been hindered by its inability to raise the necessary funding. To begin that step, management recognizes that the Company's funding needs will be significantly greater and it will require additional sources of funding since the Company is not yet able to generate revenues from operations. Because the Company does not currently have the funds it believes are needed to open its first retail location, and because revenues that may be generated from operation of the Company's proposed website are likely not to be sufficient, the Company hopes to raise an additional $475,000, the amount management estimates it needs need to open its first retail location. Management projects that such financing will need to be raised through borrowings and equity financing. Management hopes to begin raising this amount during the second quarter of 2005. If the Company fails to raise this amount by the end of 2005, management will focus the Company's efforts on its proposed internet operations and website. If the Company is unable to raise the necessary funds to finance its proposed internet operations and website, the Company will likely reevaluate its business plan.
 
USE OF ESTIMATES:
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
 
CASH:
 
EQUIVALENTS
 
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash equivalents include all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less which are not securing any corporate obligations.
 
CONCENTRATION
 
The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.
 
 
GOLF TWO, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003 AND PERIOD FROM MARCH 15, 2001
(INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2004
 
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED:
 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
 
For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, and period from March 15, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2004, Comprehensive Income consists only of net income (loss) and, therefore, a Statement of Other Comprehensive Income has not been included in the financial statements.
 
BASIC AND DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
 
In accordance with SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share," basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income
 
(loss) per common share is computed similar to basic income per common share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. As of December 31, 2004, the Company did not have any equity or debt instruments outstanding that can be converted into common stock.
 
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES:
 
The Company accounts for income taxes under SFAS 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." Under the asset and liability method of SFAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under SFAS 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations.
 
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
 
The estimated fair values of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses, none of which are held for trading purposes, approximate their carrying value because of the short term maturity of these instruments.
 
 
GOLF TWO, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003 AND PERIOD FROM MARCH 15, 2001
(INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2004
 
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED:
 
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION:
 
The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and complies with the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation". Under APB 25, compensation cost is recognized over the vesting period based on the excess, if any, on the date of grant of the deemed fair value of the Company's shares over the employee's exercise price. When the exercise price of the employee share options is less than the fair value price of the underlying shares on the grant date, deferred stock compensation is recognized and amortized to expense in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 28 over the vesting period of the individual options. Accordingly, because the exercise price of the Company's employee options equals or exceeds the market price of the underlying shares on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized. Options or shares awards issued to non-employees are valued using the fair value method and expensed over the period services are provided. As of December 31, 2004, there were no outstanding stock options.
 
ADVERTISING COSTS:
 
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. There were no advertising expenses for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and period from March 15, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2004.
 
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:
 
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151 "Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. The amendments made by Statement 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after November 23, 2004. . The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of SFAS 151, and does not believe the impact will be significant to the Company's overall results of operations or financial position.
 
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.152, "Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions--an amendment of FASB Statements No. 66 and 67" ("SFAS 152) The amendments made by Statement 152 This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, to reference the financial accounting and reporting guidance for real estate time-sharing transactions that is provided in AICPA Statement of Position (SOP) 04-2, Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions. This Statement also amends FASB Statement No. 67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, to state that the guidance for (a) incidental operations and (b) costs incurred to sell real estate projects does not apply to real estate time-sharing transactions. The accounting for those operations and costs is subject to the guidance in SOP 04-2. This Statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. with earlier application
 
 
GOLF TWO, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003 AND PERIOD FROM MARCH 15, 2001
(INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2004
 
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED:
 
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS, CONTINUED:
 
encouraged The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of SFAS 152, and does not believe the impact will be significant to the Company's overall results of operations or financial position.
 
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions."The amendments made by Statement 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with a broader exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. Previously, Opinion 29 required that the accounting for an exchange of a productive asset for a similar productive asset or an equivalent interest in the same or similar productive asset should be based on the recorded amount of the asset relinquished. Opinion 29 provided an exception to its basic measurement principle (fair value) for exchanges of similar productive assets. The Board believes that exception required that some nonmonetary exchanges, although commercially substantive, be recorded on a carryover basis. By focusing the exception on exchanges that lack commercial substance, the Board believes this Statement produces financial reporting that more faithfully represents the economics of the transactions. The Statement is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after the date of issuance. The provisions of this Statement shall be applied prospectively. The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of SFAS 152, and does not believe the impact will be significant to the Company's overall results of operations or financial position.
 
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment". Statement 123(R) will provide investors and other users of financial statements with more complete and neutral financial information by requiring that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. Statement 123(R) covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. Statement 123(R) replaces FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Statement 123, as originally issued in 1995, established as preferable a fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. However, that Statement permitted entities the option of continuing to apply the guidance in Opinion 25, as long as the footnotes to financial statements disclosed what net income would have been had the preferable fair-value-based method been used. Public entities (other than those filing as small business issuers) will be required to apply Statement 123(R) as of the first interim or annual
 
 
GOLF TWO, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003 AND PERIOD FROM MARCH 15, 2001
(INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2004
 
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED:
 
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS, CONTINUED:
 
reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of SFAS 123(R), and does not believe the impact will be significant to the Company's overall results of operations or financial position.
 
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued two FASB Staff Positions - FSP FAS 109-1, Application of FASB Statement 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes" to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and FSP FAS 109-2 Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. Neither of these affected the Company as it does not participate in the related activities.
 
(2) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
 
PREFERRED STOCK
 
The Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value at $.001 per share. As of December 31, 3004, none of the shares were issued or outstanding.
 
Common Stock
 
In March 2001, the Company issued 19,775,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for services to incorporate the Company. In February 2002, the Board of Directors declared that the Company had not received consideration for the issuance of 11,637,500 shares of the previously issued shares and canceled those shares leaving 8,137,500 shares totaling $2,325. The Founder Shares were valued at the par value of the Company's common stock, which represented its fair market value on the date of issuance. The Company has not recognized the issuance of the cancelled shares in the financial statements.
 
In February 2002, 10,500,000 shares of common stock were issued at $0.03 per share in exchange for prior services rendered for a total of $90,000, which represented its fair market value on the date of issuance.
 
In April 2002, the Company performed a private placement and issued 7,326,679 shares of its common stock at $0.03 per share for an aggregate total of $62,800.
 
(3) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
 
OFFICE SPACE
 
A stockholder of the Company provided office space to the Company at $100 per month on a month-to-month basis, which was recorded as a contribution to capital. Total office expense for the years ended December, 2004 and 2003 amounted to $1,200 and $1,200, respectively, and for the period from March 15, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2004 amounted to $5,300.
 
 
GOLF TWO, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003 AND PERIOD FROM MARCH 15, 2001
(INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2004


(3) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS, CONTINUED:
 
NOTE PAYABLE
 
On November 5, 2003, the Company was loaned $50,000 by a stockholder in exchange for a promissory note. The principal is due and payable on November 5, 2008 with interest payable on the unpaid balance at 4% per annum. Total interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 amounted to $2,000 and $300, respectively, and for the period from March 15, 2001 (inception) to December 31, 2004 amounted to $2,300.
 
(4) PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES:
 
Deferred income taxes are reported using the liability method. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
 
As of December 31, 2004, the Company had a net federal operating loss carryforward of $193,238, expiring in 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the valuation allowance increased by $25,293. Deferred tax assets resulting from the net operating losses are reduced by a valuation allowance, when, in the opinion of management, utilization is not reasonably assured.

A summary is as follows:
       
Net operating loss carryforward
  
$
193,238
  
Effective tax rate
    
34
%
Deferred tax asset
    
65,701
  
Valuation allowance
    
(65,701
)
Net deferred tax asset
  
$
—
  

 
(5) SUBSEQUENT EVENT:
 
On March 1, 2005, the Company was issued a note in the amount of $24,909 by an unrelated party, with principal due in five years and is non-interest bearing.
 
 
Independent Auditors' Report


Stockholders
Airgroup Corporation
Bellevue, WA

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Airgroup Corporation as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related statements of income and retained earnings and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those stan-dards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by manage-ment, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Airgroup Corporation as of June 30, 2005 and 2004 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


/s/ Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP

Melville, New York
December 1, 2005
 
AIRGROUP CORPORATION
               
                             
   
June 30,
  
September 30,
 
           
2005
   
2004
   
2005
  
           
(Unaudited)
  
Assets
              
               
Current Assets:
              
Cash and cash equivalents
  
$
2,394,509
  
$
2,131,885
  
$
2,434,461
  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for
                    
doubtful accounts of approximately $218,000,
                    
$188,000 and $218,000, respectively
    
8,142,302
   
6,974,899
   
8,157,265
 
Other receivables
    
34,342
   
44,917
   
39,040
 
Prepaid freight charges
    
674,034
   
—
    
721,504
 
Prepaid income taxes
    
—
    
140,694
   
—
  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    
55,837
   
46,796
   
30,805
 
Deferred income taxes
    
221,000
    
—
     
221,000
 
Total Current Assets
    
11,522,024
   
9,339,191
   
11,604,075
 
                     
Restricted Cash
    
253,820
   
253,820
   
253,820
 
Equipment and Furniture, net
    
261,071
   
203,683
   
250,957
 
Employee Loan Receivable
    
200,000
   
—
    
200,671
 
Investment in Real Estate
    
20,000
   
20,000
   
20,000
 
Deposits
    
2,250
    
1,700
    
19,294
 
Total Assets
  
$
12,259,165
   
$
9,818,394
   
$
12,348,817
  
                     
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
                    
                     
Current Liabilities:
                    
Accounts payable, trade
  
$
1,222,279
  
$
1,426,443
  
$
410,509
  
Accrued transportation costs
    
4,959,817
   
3,240,116
   
5,648,848
 
Commissions payable
    
985,906
   
972,798
   
745,184
 
Accrued payroll, benefits and other
    
542,619
   
450,211
   
493,493
 
Income taxes payable
    
1,427,306
   
—
    
1,598,306
 
Deferred income taxes
    
—
     
1,087,000
    
—
  
Total Current Liabilities
    
9,137,927
    
7,176,568
    
8,896,340
 
                     
Commitments and Contingencies
                    
                     
Stockholders' Equity:
                    
Common stock, $10 par value; 10,000 shares authorized,
                    
158 shares issued and outstanding
    
1,580
   
1,580
   
1,580
 
Additional paid-in capital
    
55,620
   
55,620
   
55,620
 
Retained Earnings
    
3,064,038
    
2,584,626
    
3,395,277
 
Total Stockholders' Equity
    
3,121,238
    
2,641,826
    
3,452,477
 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
  
$
12,259,165
   
$
9,818,394
   
$
12,348,817
  
                     
                     
See notes to financial statements.
 
 
AIRGROUP CORPORATION
                   
                                               
   
Years Ended
  
Three Months Ended
  
   
June 30,
  
September 30,
  
          
2005
   
2004
   
2005
   
2004
  
           
(Unaudited)
  
(Unaudited)
  
                 
Revenue
  
$
51,521,105
  
$
42,971,762
  
$
13,433,532
  
$
11,275,149
  
Cost of Transportation
    
29,957,182
    
22,831,478
    
8,664,119
     
6,487,097
 
Gross Profit
    
21,563,923
    
20,140,284
    
4,769,413
    
4,788,052
 
                           
Costs and Expenses:
                          
Agent commissions
    
15,987,807
   
14,912,247
   
3,466,343
   
3,793,314
 
Personnel costs
    
3,398,765
   
3,303,600
   
505,695
   
501,984
 
Selling, general and administrative costs
    
1,313,414
   
1,144,640
   
265,909
   
274,306
 
Depreciation
    
113,793
    
186,546
    
30,062
     
28,800
 
Total Costs and Expenses
    
20,813,779
    
19,547,033
    
4,268,009
    
4,598,404
 
                           
Income from Operations
    
750,144
   
593,251
   
501,404
   
189,648
 
                           
Other Income (Expense):
                          
Interest income
    
14,577
   
12,867
   
861
   
(302
)
Interest expense
    
(29
)
  
(154
)
  
(26
)
  
—
  
Total Other Income
    
14,548
    
12,713
    
835
   
(302
)
                           
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes
    
764,692
   
605,964
   
502,239
   
189,346
 
                           
Provision for Income Taxes
    
260,000
   
198,832
   
171,000
   
64,000
 
                           
Net Income
    
504,692
   
407,132
   
331,239
   
125,346
 
Retained Earnings, Beginning of Period
    
2,584,626
   
2,202,774
   
3,064,038
   
2,584,626
 
Stockholder Distributions
    
(25,280
)
  
(25,280
)
  
—
     
—
  
Retained Earnings, End of Period
  
$
3,064,038
   
$
2,584,626
   
$
3,395,277
   
$
2,709,972
  
                           
                           
See notes to financial statements.
 
AIRGROUP CORPORATION
                   
                              
   
Years Ended
  
Three Months Ended
  
   
June 30,
  
September 30,
  
            
2005
    
2004
    
2005
    
2004
  
           
(Unaudited)
  
(Unaudited)
  
                   
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
                  
Net income
  
$
504,692
   
$
407,132
   
$
331,239
   
$
125,346
  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
                          
provided by operating activities:
                          
Provision for doubtful accounts
    
30,000
   
58,000
   
—
    
—
  
Deferred income taxes
    
(1,308,000
)
  
161,000
   
—
    
—
  
Depreciation
    
113,793
   
186,546
   
30,062
   
28,800
 
Decrease (increase) in operating assets:
                          
Accounts receivable
    
(1,197,403
)
  
(2,335,050
)
  
(14,963
)
  
423,304
 
Prepaid freight charges
    
(674,034
)
  
—
    
(47,470
)
  
—
  
Prepaid income taxes
    
140,694
   
(22,168
)
  
—
    
64,000
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    
1,534
   
(65,542
)
  
19,663
   
6,637
 
Other assets
    
(550
)
  
(1,700
)
  
(17,044
)
  
(10,000
)
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
                          
Accounts payable
    
(204,164
)
  
353,113
   
(811,770
)
  
(166,941
)
Accrued transportation costs
    
1,719,701
   
875,820
   
689,031
   
281,893
 
Commissions payable
    
13,108
   
450,517
   
(240,722
)
  
257,372
 
Accrued payroll, benefits and other
    
92,408
   
(6,717
)
  
(49,126
)
  
115,290
 
Income taxes payable
    
1,427,306
    
—
     
171,000
    
—
  
Total adjustments
    
154,393
    
(346,181
)
  
(271,339
)
  
1,000,355
 
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
    
659,085
    
60,951
    
59,900
    
1,125,701
 
                           
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
                          
Loan to employee
    
(200,000
)
  
—
    
—
    
—
  
Repayment of employee loans
    
—
    
128,584
   
—
    
—
  
Acquisition of equipment
    
(171,181
)
  
(249,044
)
  
(19,948
)
  
(25,328
)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
    
(371,181
)
  
(120,460
)
  
(19,948
)
  
(25,328
)
                           
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
                          
Distributions to stockholders
    
(25,280
)
  
(25,280
)
  
—
     
—
  
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
    
(25,280
)
  
(25,280
)
  
—
     
—
  
                           
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
    
262,624
   
(84,789
)
  
39,952
   
1,100,373
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period
    
2,131,885
    
2,216,674
    
2,394,509
    
2,131,885
 
Cash and Cash equivalents, end of period
  
$
2,394,509
   
$
2,131,885
   
$
2,434,461
   
$
3,232,258
  
                           
                           
See notes to financial statements.
 
 

AIRGROUP CORPORATION
 
Years Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 and the Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Information with respect to the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 is unaudited)

1.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Nature of business - Airgroup Corporation (the "Company") is a non-asset based freight forwarding and logistics provider and has a network of offices in cities throughout the United States. The Company was incorporated in the State of Washington.
 
The Company's freight forwarding services involve arranging for the total transport of customers' freight from the shipper's location to the designated recipients, including the preparation of shipping documents and the providing of handling, packing and containerization services. The Company’s network of offices is in 35 cities throughout the United States, 34 of which have exclusive agency relationships and one operated by the Company.
 
Revenue recognition - As a non-asset based carrier, the Company does not own transportation assets. The Company generates the major portion of its air and ocean freight revenues by purchasing transportation services from direct (asset-based) carriers and reselling those services to its customers.
 
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 91-9 "Revenue and Expense Recognition for Freight Services in Process", revenue from freight forwarding and export services is recognized at the time the freight is tendered to the direct carrier at origin, and direct expenses associated with the cost of transportation are accrued concurrently. Ongoing provision is made for doubtful receivables, discounts, returns and allowances.
 
The Company recognizes revenue on a gross basis, in accordance with EITF 99-19, "Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net", as a result of the following: The Company is the primary obligor responsible for providing the service desired by the customer and is responsible for fulfillment, including the acceptability of the service(s) ordered or purchased by the customer. The Company, at its sole discretion, sets the prices charged to customers, and is not required to obtain approval or consent from any other party in establishing its prices. The Company has multiple suppliers for the services it sells to its customers, and has the absolute and complete discretion and right to select the supplier that will provide the product(s) or service(s) ordered by a customer, including changing the supplier on a shipment-by-shipment basis. The Company, in most cases, does determine the nature, type, characteristics, and specifications of the service(s) ordered by the customer. The Company assumes credit risk for the amount billed to the customer.
 
Cash and cash equivalents - The Company considers all short-term instruments purchased with maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
 
Restricted cash - Restricted cash consists of cash bonds posted in connection with surety agreements.
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts - Losses from uncollectible accounts are provided for by utilizing the allowance for doubtful accounts method based upon management's estimate of uncollectible accounts. Management specifically analyzed accounts receivable and analyzes potential bad debts, customer concentrations, credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms when evaluating the allowance for doubtful accounts.
 
Equipment and furniture - Equipment and furniture are recorded at cost and are depreciated over the estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Significant renovations are capitalized.
 
Use of estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statement and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The primary estimates underlying the Company's financial statements include allowance for doubtful accounts, accruals for transportation and other direct costs, and accruals for cargo insurance.
 
 
AIRGROUP CORPORATION
 
Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 and the Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Information with respect to the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 is unaudited)
 
Income taxes - Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on the deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
 
Concentration of credit risk - The Company invests its excess cash in deposits and money market accounts with major financial institutions and has not experienced losses related to these investments.
 
The Company's accounts receivable is composed of significant foreign and domestic accounts. Historically, the Company has not experienced significant losses related to receivables from individual customers or groups of customers in any particular geographic area.
 
Foreign Currency Transactions - In the normal course of business the Company has accounts receivable and accounts payable that are transacted in foreign currencies. The Company accounts for transaction differences in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard Number 52, "Foreign Currency Translation", and accounts for the gains or losses in operations. For all periods presented, these amounts were immaterial to the Company's operations.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 151 "Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4". The amendments made by Statement 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after November 23, 2004. This pronouncement will not affect the Company as the Company does not engage in these types of transactions.
 
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions." The amendments made by Statement 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with a broader exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. Previously, Opinion 29 required that the accounting for an exchange of a productive asset for a similar productive asset or an equivalent interest in the same or similar productive asset should be based on the recorded amount of the asset relinquished. Opinion 29 provided an exception to its basic measurement principle (fair value) for exchanges of similar productive assets. The Statement is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after the date of issuance. The pronouncement will not affect the Company as the Company does not engage in these types of transactions.
 
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment". Statement 123(R) will provide investors and other users of financial statements with more complete and neutral financial information by requiring that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. Statement 123(R) covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. Statement 123(R) replaces FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Statement 123, as originally issued in 1995, established as preferable a fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. However, that Statement permitted entities the option of continuing to apply the guidance in Opinion 25, as long as the footnotes to financial statements disclosed what net income would have been had the preferable fair-value-based method been used. Non-public entities will be required to apply Statement 123(R) as of the first annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005. The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of SFAS 123(R), and does not believe the impact will be significant to the Company's overall results of operations or financial position.
 

AIRGROUP CORPORATION
 
Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 and the Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Information with respect to the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 is unaudited)
 
In December 2004, the FASB issued two Staff Positions, FSP 109-1 "Accounting for Income Taxes" to the tax deduction on "Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Job Creation Act of 2004", and FSP FAS 109-2, "Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision with the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004." Neither of these pronouncements had an effect on the Company as the Company does not participate in the related activities.
 
In March 2005, the staff of the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 ("SAB 107"). The interpretations in SAB 107 express views of the staff regarding the interaction between SFAS 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations and provide the staff's views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. In particular SAB 107 provides guidance related to share-based payment transactions with nonemployees, the transition from public entity status, valuation methods (including assumptions such as expected volatility and expected term), the accounting for certain redeemable financial instruments issued under share-based payment arrangements, the classification of compensation expense, non-GAAP financial measures, first-time adoption of SFAS 123(R) in an interim period, capitalization of compensation cost related to share-based payment arrangements, the accounting for income tax effects of share-based payment arrangements upon adoption of SFAS 123(R) and the modification of employee share options prior to adoption of SFAS 123(R).
 
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” which replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20 "Accounting Changes" and SFAS No. 3, "Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements-An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28." SFAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted by the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
 
On December 23, 2003, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 132 (Revised 2003), "Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits". This standard increases the existing GAAP disclosure requirements by requiring more details about pension plan assets, benefit obligations, cash flows, benefit costs and related information. Companies will be required to segregate plan assets by category, such as debt, equity and real estate, and provide certain expected rates of return and other informational disclosures. Statement 132R also requires companies to disclose various elements of pension and postretirement benefit costs in interim-period financial statements for quarters beginning after December 15, 2003. The new standard provides that companies with foreign plans may defer certain disclosures associated with those plans until fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. Finally, like the original Statement 132, the FASB permits reduced disclosures for nonpublic entities, and many of the additional disclosures required of nonpublic entities may be deferred until fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. To assist companies in understanding the new rules and their purpose, the FASB has also issued FASB Statement No. 132 (Revised 2003), "Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits, Frequently Asked Questions". In addition, FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 106-1, "Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003", addresses certain situations with respect to employers which provide for prescription drug coverage as part of their benefit plans. The FSP requires additional disclosures beyond that required by Statement 132(R) and permits companies to reflect the provisions in FSP FAS 106-1 in calendar year-end financial statements in certain situations. FSP FAS 106-2, which has the same title as FSP FAS 106-1, supersedes FSP FAS 106-1 upon its effective date. This pronouncement will not affect the Company, as the Company does not engage in these types of transactions.
 

AIRGROUP CORPORATION
 
Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 and the Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Information with respect to the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 is unaudited)
 
Interim Financial Statements - The unaudited financial statements as of September 30, 2005 and for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 reflect all adjustments necessary (consisting only of normal recurring nature) to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of September 30, 2005, and the results of operations and cash flows for the three month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.
 
2.
Equipment and Furniture, Net
 
Equipment and furniture, at cost, consists of the following:
 
       
June 30,
  
September 30,
  
          
Useful Lives
    
2005
    
2004
   
2005
  
               
(Unaudited)
  
                 
Computers and Equipment
    
3 to 7 years
  
$
1,215,354
  
$
1,054,510
  
$
1,233,990
  
Furniture and Fixtures
    
5 to 7 years
    
182,176
    
178,252
    
182,176
  
Vehicles
    
5 years
    
64,097
     
64,097
     
64,097
  
           
1,461,627
    
1,296,859
    
1,480,263
  
Less Accumulated Depreciation
          
1,200,556
     
1,093,176
     
1,229,306
  
         
$
261,071
   
$
203,683
   
$
250,957
  
 
3.
Employee Loan Receivable

Employee loan receivable at June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2005 consists of a $200,000 loan, to an officer of the Company, which bears interest at 4% per annum, until November 2009 when any outstanding principal and accrued interest is due and payable.
 
4.
Income Taxes
 
The Company files U.S. federal income tax returns. There is no state or local tax on income in Washington State; as such no provision for state and local taxes has been made.
 
The provision for income taxes is comprised of the following:
 
   
Years Ended
June 30,
  
Three Months Ended
September 30,
  
                
2005
   
2004
   
2005
   
2004
  
           
(Unaudited)
  
Current:
                  
Federal
  
$
1,568,000
  
$
37,832
  
$
171,000
  
$
64,000
  
Deferred:
                          
Federal
    
(1,308,000
)
  
161,000
     
—
     
—
  
Provision for Income Taxes
  
$
260,000
    
$
198,832
   
$
171,000
   
$
64,000
  
 
 

AIRGROUP CORPORATION
 
Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 and the Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Information with respect to the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 is unaudited)
 
A reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to the Company’s effective tax rate is as follows:
 
   
Years Ended
June 30,
  
Three Months Ended
September 30,
  
       
2005
   
2004
   
2005
   
2004
  
         
(Unaudited)
  
U.S. Federal Statutory Income Tax Rate
    
34.0
%
  
34.0
%
  
34.0
%
  
34.0
%
Effect of Graduated Tax Rates
     
0.0
     
(1.2
)
  
0.0
     
0.0
  
Effective Tax Rate
    
34.0
%
  
32.8
%
  
34.0
%
  
34.0
%
 
The components of the net deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows:
 
   
June 30,
  
September 30,
  
       
2005
   
2004
   
2005
  
           
(Unaudited)
  
             
Deferred Tax Assets:
              
Accrued sick and vacation
  
$
78,000
  
$
64,000
  
$
78,000
  
Accrued compensation
    
79,000
    
83,000
    
79,000
  
Allowance for doubtful accounts
    
74,000
    
192,000
    
74,000
  
Other
    
—
     
15,000
     
—
  
Total Deferred Tax Assets
    
231,000
     
354,000
     
231,000
  
                     
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
                    
Deferred revenue
    
—
    
(1,431,000
)
  
—
  
Depreciation
    
(10,000
)
  
(10,000
)
  
(10,000
)
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities
    
(10,000
)
  
(1,441,000
)
  
(10,000
)
Net Deferred Tax Asset (Liability)
  
$
221,000
   
$
(1,087,000
)
$
221,000
  
 
5.
Operating Lease Commitments
 
The Company leases various office and warehouse space under non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through December 2010. Certain leases also require the Company to pay a monthly common area maintenance charges. Rent expense approximated $201,000 and $192,000, respectively, for the years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, and $60,000 and $75,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.
 
The approximate minimum future lease commitments as of June 30, 2005 are as follows:
 
Year Ending June 30,
          
       
 
2006
  
$
64,000
  
 
2007
    
76,000
  
 
2008
    
64,000
  
 
2009
    
64,000
  
 
2010
    
64,000
  
 
Thereafter
    
32,000
  
 
6.
Supplementary Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
 
During the years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, cash paid for interest totaled approximately $30 and $150, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, cash paid for interest totaled approximately $30 and $0, respectively.
 
7.
Subsequent Event
 
On September 19, 2005, the Company’s stockholders entered into a letter of intent to sell all of the outstanding shares of common stock to Radiant Logistics, Inc. (a publicly traded company) for an approximate sales price of $10,000,000 in cash, plus certain earn-out payments, in stock and cash, contingent on future performance goals of the Company, as defined.
 
 
Basis of Presentation

On January 11, 2006, Radiant Logistics, Inc. (“Radiant”) acquired 100 percent of the outstanding stock of Airgroup Corporation, a privately held Washington corporation. The total value of the transaction was $14.0 million, consisting of cash of $9.5 million at closing, a subsequent installment payment of $500,000 payable in two years, a contingent payment of $600,000 payable in one year, and a five year earn-out arrangement of up to a total of $3.4 million based upon the future financial performance of Airgroup payable in shares of Radiant’s common stock. With respect to the earn-out arrangement, $1.9 million payable in Company common stock in equal installments over a three-year earn-out period commencing July 1, 2006, and based upon Airgroup achieving income from continuing operations of not less than $2.5 million per year. As additional incentive to achieve future earnings growth, there is an opportunity to earn up to an additional $1.5 million payable in Company common stock at the end of a five-year earn-out period. Under this arrangement, the former shareholders of Airgroup are entitled to receive 50% of the cumulative income from continuing operations in excess of $15,000,000 generated during the five-year earn-out period commencing July 1, 2006, up to a maximum of $1,500,000. With respect to the earn-out payment of $1.9 million, in the event there is a shortfall in income from continuing operations, the earn-out payment will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis to the extent of the shortfall. Shortfalls may be carried over or carried back to the extent that income from continuing operations in any other payout year exceeds the $2.5 million level.

These contingent payments will be accounted for as additional cost of Airgroup when the contingencies are resolved and the consideration is issued or becomes issuable. Accordingly, the purchase price allocation presented herein is preliminary and includes only the $9.5 million paid at closing financed plus the $0.5 million payment due January 11, 2008.

The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of income for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 and the three months ended March 31, 2005 presents Radiant’s acquisition of Airgroup as if it had occurred at the beginning of each of those respect reporting period.

The customer related and intangible asset was valued using an income approach and is being amortized using an accelerated method that approximates the expected future economic benefit of the intangible. The covenant not to compete is also valued using an income approach and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the five year life of the agreement. Other detailed assumptions used to prepare the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information are contained in the accompanying explanatory notes.

The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the financial position or results of operations which would have actually been reported had the transaction been consummated at the dates mentioned above or which may be reported in the future. This unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information is based upon the respective historical financial statements of Radiant and Airgroup and should be read in conjunction with those statements and the related notes.
 
 
RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
(amounts in thousands, except share and per share information)
 
   
Historical Statements
              
   
Radiant
Logistics, Inc
(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)
  

Airgroup
(Unaudited)
  
Acquistion
Pro Forma
Adjustments
      

Pro Forma
(Unaudited)
  
Transportation revenue
  
$
-
  
$
12,566
  
$
-
        
$
12,566
  
Cost of transportation
    
-
   
7,330
   
-
         
7,330
 
                                 
Net transportation revenue
    
-
   
5,236
   
-
         
5,236
 
                                 
Agent commission
          
3,883
               
3,883
 
Personnel Costs
          
832
         
(x)
 
  
832
 
Other SG&A
    
14
   
314
               
328
 
Depreciation & Amortization
          
30
   
170
   
(y)
 
  
200
 
                                 
Income from operations
    
(14
)
  
177
   
(170
)
        
(7
)
                                 
Other income (expense)
    
(1
)
  
(1
)
  
-
         
(2
)
                                 
Income before income taxes
    
(15
)
  
176
   
(170
)
        
(9
)
Income taxes
    
-
   
171
   
(174
)
  
(z)
 
  
(3
)
                                 
Net income attributable to common stockholders
  
$
(15
)
$
5
  
$
4
        
$
(6
)
                                 
Basic and diluted earnings per common share
                            
(0.00
)
                                 
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
                            
25,964,179
 

(y)
To reflect amortization of acquired identifiable intangibles.
 
(z)
To reflect estimated federal/state income tax expense at a rate of 34%.
 
F-51
 
RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income*
Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2005
(amounts in thousands, except share and per share information)

   
Historical Statements
              
   
Radiant
Logistics, Inc
(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)
  

Airgroup
(Unaudited)
  
Acquistion
Pro Forma
Adjustments
      

Pro Forma
(Unaudited)
  
Transportation revenue
  
$
-
  
$
51,521
  
$
-
        
$
51,521
  
Cost of transportation
    
-
   
29,957
   
-
         
29,957
 
                                 
Net transportation revenue
    
-
   
21,564
   
-
         
21,564
 
                                 
Agent commission
          
15,988
               
15,988
 
Personnel Costs
          
3,399
   
(1,443
)
  
(w
)
  
1,956
 
Other SG&A
    
29
   
1,313
               
1,342
 
Depreciation & Amortization
          
114
   
574
   
(x
)
  
688
 
                             
19,974
 
Income from operations
    
(29
)
  
750
   
869
         
1,590
 
                                 
Other income (expense)
    
(2
)
  
15
   
(175
)
  
(y
)
  
(162
)
                                 
Income before income taxes
    
(31
)
  
765
   
694
         
1,428
 
Income taxes
    
-
   
260
   
226
   
(z
)
  
486
 
                                 
Net income attributable to common stockholders
  
$
(31
)
$
505
  
$
468
        
$
942
  
 
                                
Basic and diluted earnings per common share
                            
0.04
 
                                 
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
                            
25,964,179
 
 
(w)
To reflect contractual reduction in officers' and related family members' compensation at Airgroup.
 
(x)
To reflect amortization of acquired identifiable intangibles.
 
(y)
To reflect interest expense on advances under the bank facility.
 
(z)
To reflect estimated federal/state income tax expense at a rate of 34%.
 
*Supplemental pro forma information is being provided since historical data which merely reflects the prior period results of the Company on a stand-alone basis prior to the acquisition of Airgroup would provide no meaningful data with respect to our ongoing operations.
 
F-52
 
RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income*
Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2004
(amounts in thousands, except share and per share information)

   
Historical Statements
              
   
Radiant
Logistics, Inc
(f/k/a Golf Two, Inc.)
  
Airgroup
(Unaudited)
  
 
Acquistion
Pro Forma
Adjustments
      
Pro Forma
(Unaudited)
  
Transportation revenue
  
$
-
  
$
42,972
  
$
-
        
$
42,972
  
Cost of transportation
    
-
   
22,832
   
-
         
22,832
 
                                 
Net transportation revenue
    
-
   
20,140
   
-
         
20,140
 
                                 
Agent commission
          
14,912
               
14,912
 
Personnel Costs
          
3,304
   
(1,564
)
  
(w
)
  
1,740
 
Other SG&A
    
31
   
1,145
               
1,176
 
Depreciation & Amortization
          
186
   
574
   
(x
)
  
760
 
                             
18,588
 
Income from operations
    
(31
)
  
593
   
990
         
1,552
 
                                 
Other income (expense)
    
(1
)
  
13
   
(175
)
  
(y
)
  
(163
)
                                 
Income before income taxes
    
(32
)
  
606
   
815
         
1,389
 
Income taxes
    
-
   
199
   
273
   
(z
)
  
472
 
                                 
Net income attributable to common stockholders
  
$
(32
)
$
407
  
$
542
        
$
917
  
                                 
Basic and diluted earnings per common share
                            
0.04
 
                                 
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
                            
25,964,179
 
 
(w)
Toreflect contractual reduction in officers' and related family members' compensation at Airgroup.
 
(x)
To reflect amortization of acquired identifiable intangibles.
 
(y) 
 To reflect interest expense on advances under the bank facility.
 
(z)
 To reflect estimated federal/state income tax expense at a rate of 34%.
 
*Supplemental pro forma information is being provided since historical data which merely reflects the prior period results of the Company on a stand-alone basis prior to the acquisition of Airgroup would provide no meaningful data with respect to our ongoing operations.
 
 
No dealer, salesman or any other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus in connection with the offer made by the prospectus and, if given or made, such information or representation must not be relied upon as having been authorized by Radiant Logistics, Inc. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorized, or in which the person making such offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so, or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstance, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of Radiant Logistics, Inc. or that the information contained herein is correct as of any time subsequent to the date hereof.

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.

14,847,461 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

June [    ], 2006

 
Part II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
 
Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

We will pay all expenses in connection with the registration and sale of the common stock by the selling shareholders. The estimated expenses of issuance and distribution are set forth below:
 
Registration fees
 
$
1,596
  
Transfer agent fees
 
$
5,000
  
Costs of printing and engraving
 
$
12,500
  
Legal fees
 
$
50,000
  
Accounting fees
 
$
25,000
  
Miscellaneous
 
$
5,904
  
Total estimated costs of offering
 
$
100,000
  

Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws reflect the adoption of the provisions of Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which eliminate or limit the personal liability of a director to our stockholders or us for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty under certain circumstances. If applicable Delaware law is amended to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting personal liability of directors, our certificate of incorporation provides that the liability of a director shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Delaware law.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws also provide that we shall indemnify any person who was or is a party to a proceeding by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of ours, or is or was serving at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including judgments, fines, amounts paid in settlement and attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with a proceeding if such person acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to our best interests, in accordance with, and to the full extent permitted by, applicable Delaware law. The determination of whether indemnification is proper under the circumstances, unless made by a court, shall be determined by our Board of Directors.

Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

1. In October 2005, we issued an aggregate of 2,272,728 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.44 per share for gross cash consideration of $1.0 million with the proceeds available to the Company on an unrestricted basis. The shares were issued in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and the safe-harbor private offering exemption provided by Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act, without the payment of underwriting discounts or commissions to any person.

 
II-1

2. In December, 2005, we issued 10,098,943 shares to a limited number of accredited investors in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and the safe harbor offering exemption provided by Rule 506 and Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act. 6,054,545 of the Share were sold to seven (7) U.S. accredited investors for gross proceeds of approximately $2.6 million; from which no underwriting discounts or commissions were paid. 4,044,398 of the Shares were sold to 6 non-U.S. accredited investors for gross proceeds of approximately $1.8 million; from which approximately $142,000 was deducted as financial advisory fees paid to a non-U.S. person. The Shares sold to non-U.S. investors were sold in reliance on Regulation S, with each investor representing that, among other things, it is not a U.S. person within the meaning of Regulation S, with appropriate legends contained within the Offering Documents and to be placed on the Shares, and with no selling efforts made within the U.S.
 
3. In December 2005, we issued 500,000 shares of common stock to a financial advisor for financial advisory and investment banking services provided in connection with, among other things, our transition to a third-party logistics company. These shares were issued in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. 
 
4. In January 2006, in conjunction with our acquisition of Airgroup, we issued 1,009,093 shares of our common stock to a limited number of Airgroup shareholders and employees, all of whom are accredited investors for gross proceeds of $444,000, without the payment of underwriting discounts or commissions to any person. These shares were issued in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and the safe harbor offering exemption provided by Regulation D of Rule 506.

5. In February 2006, we issued 1,466,697 shares of our common stock to a limited number of Airgroup exclusive sales agents and their employees, key Airgroup employees and a limited number of other investors all of whom are accredited investors for gross proceeds of $645,341, without the payment of underwriting discounts or commissions to any person. These shares were issued in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and the safe harbor offering exemption provided by Regulation D of Rule 506.
 
Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Exhibit No.
  
Description
     
2.1
  
Stock Purchase Agreement by and among Radiant Logistics, Inc., the Shareholders of Airgroup Corporation and William H. Moultrie (as Shareholders’ Agent) dated January 11, 2006, effective as of January 1, 2006. (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2006).
     
2.2
  
Registration Rights Agreement by and among Radiant Logistics, Inc. and the Shareholders of Airgroup Corporation dated January 11, 2006, effective as of January 1, 2006. (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2006).
     
3.1
  
Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on September 20, 2002).
     
3.2
  
Amendment to Registrant’s Certificate of Incorporation (Certificate of Ownership and Merger Merging Radiant Logistics, Inc. into Golf Two, Inc. dated October 18, 2005) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18, 2005).
 
II-2
 
5.1
  
Opinion Re: Legality of Shares (filed herewith)
     
3.3
  
Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on September 20, 2002)
     
10.1
  
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement (representing the private placement of shares of common stock in October 2005) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18, 2005).
     
10.2
  
Radiant Logistics, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed November 14, 2005).
     
10.3
  
Confidential Private Placement Memorandum dated November 1, 2005 (including Form of Registration Rights Provisions and Subscription Agreement) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 21, 2005).
     
10.4
  
Executive Employment Agreement dated January 11, 2006 by and between Airgroup Corporation and William H. Moultrie. (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2006).
     
10.5
  
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated January 11, 2006 for the sale of 1,009,093 shares of common stock (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2006).
     
10.6
  
Loan Agreement by and among Radiant Logistics, Inc., Airgroup Corporation and Bank of America, N.A. dated as of January 10, 2006 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2006).
     
10.7
  
Executive Employment Agreement dated January 13, 2006 by and between Radiant Logistics, Inc. and Bohn H. Crain (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2006).
     
10.8
  
Option Agreement dated January 11, 2006 by and between Radiant Logistics, Inc. and William H. Moultrie (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2006).
     
10.9
  
Option Agreement dated October 20, 2005 by and between Radiant Logistics, Inc. and Bohn H. Crain (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2006).
     
14.1
  
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed on March 17, 2006).
     
21.1
  
Subsidiaries of the Registrant (*)
     
23.1
  
Consent of Stonefield Josephson (Filed Herewith)
     
23.2
  
Consent of Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP (Filed Herewith)
     
23.3
  
Consent of Counsel (included in Exhibit 5.1)

(*)
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed by the Registrant on April 6, 2006. 

 
II-3

Item 28. Undertakings.
 
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to:
 
 (1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement:

 (i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;

 (ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the Registration Statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the Registration Statement;

 (iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the Registration Statement or any material change to such information in the Registration Statement.

 (2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

 (3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

 (4) That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser: 

 (i) If the undersigned Registrant is relying on Rule 430B: 

 (A) Each prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) shall be deemed to be part of the registration statement as of the date the filed prospectus was deemed part of and included in the registration statement; and 

 (B) Each prospectus required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2), (b)(5), or (b)(7) as part of a registration statement in reliance on Rule 430B relating to an offering made pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(i), (vii), or (x) for the purpose of providing the information required by section 10(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the earlier of the date such form of prospectus is first used after effectiveness or the date of the first contract of sale of securities in the offering described in the prospectus. As provided in Rule 430B, for liability purposes of the issuer and any person that is at that date an underwriter, such date shall be deemed to be a new effective date of the registration statement relating to the securities in the registration statement to which that prospectus relates, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof, Provided however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such effective date, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such effective date; or 

 (ii) If the undersigned Registrant is subject to Rule 430C, each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use. 

 
II-4

 (5) That, for the purpose of determining liability of the undersigned Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities, the undersigned Registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned Registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned Registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser: 

 (i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned Registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424; 

 (ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned Registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned Registrant; 

 (iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned Registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned Registrant; and 

 (iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned Registrant to the purchaser. 

 (6) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been informed that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
 
II-5

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in City of Bellevue, State of Washington on June 22, 2006.
     
 
RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.
 
 		  
 		  
 
  By:   /s/ Bohn H. Crain
 
Bohn H. Crain
Chief Executive Officer
   
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
     
Date: June 22, 2006
By:   /s/ Bohn H. Crain
 
Bohn H. Crain
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director

     
Date: June 22, 2006
By:   /s/ Stephen M. Cohen
 
Stephen M. Cohen
Director , General Counsel and Secretary 

 
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
Description
   
 5.1
Opinion Re: Legality of Shares
23.1
Consent of Stonefield Josephson
23.2
Consent of Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP
23.3
Consent of Fox Rothschild LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1)

 
 
II-7