28 Cottrell Street
Mystic, Connecticut 06355
(860) 245-0191
(Address and Telephone Number of Principal Executive Offices and
Principal Place of Business)
---------------------

Samuel A. Kovnat
28 Cottrell Street
Mystic, Connecticut 06355
(860) 245-0191
(Name, Address and Telephone Number of Agent For Service)
---------------------

(1) We intend to register units having an aggregate initial public offering price of approximately $11,500,000, including units that may be sold on exercise of the underwriter's over-allotment option. The number of units to be registered and the per unit price will depend on the market price of our common stock and the effect of a reverse stock split of our common stock that we may consummate prior to this offering. We have not yet determined the split ratio, if any, to be used.

(2) Estimated pursuant to Rule 457(o) solely for the purpose of calculating the amount of the registration fee. Includes _____ units that the underwriters have the option to purchase to cover over-allotments, if any.

(3) Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act, there are also being registered hereby such additional indeterminate number of shares as may become issuable pursuant to any antidilution provisions of the warrants.

(4) In connection with the sale of units, we are granting to the representative of the underwriters a warrant to purchase up to ______ units at a per unit purchase price equal to 120 percent of the public offering price of a unit. No registration fee is required pursuant to Rule 457(g).

We hereby amend this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until we shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective of such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

     We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that contained in this prospectus. These securities may be sold only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of the securities. You must not consider that the delivery of this prospectus or any sale of the securities covered by this prospectus implies that there has been no change in our affairs since the date of this prospectus or that the information contained in this prospectus is current or complete as of any time after the date of this prospectus.

     Except for the historical information presented in this document, the matters discussed in this prospectus, or otherwise incorporated by reference into this document, contain "forward-looking statements" (as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). These statements are identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes", "plans", "intend", "scheduled", "potential", "continue", "estimates", "hopes", "goal", "objective", expects", "may", "will", "should" or "anticipates" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. The safe harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, apply to forward-looking statements made by us. We caution you that no statements contained in this prospectus should be construed as a guarantee or assurance of future performance or results. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those identified within this prospectus. The actual results that we achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements due to such risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, and, except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update this information whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this prospectus and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business.

     SOCRATES (TM) and UNICORN (TM) are trademarks of ours. This prospectus also refers to trademarks and trade names of other companies and organizations.

     Unless the context indicates otherwise, all references in this prospectus to "we", "our", "us", "FST" or the "Company" refer to Flight Safety Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation.

     We are developing two proprietary technologies designed to enhance aviation safety and reduce airport delays on which we have received United States and foreign patents.

     Using our opto-acoustic technology, known as SOCRATES (Sensor for Optically Characterizing Remote Atmospheric Turbulence Emanating Sound), we are currently working on development of a sensor to detect and track air disturbances known as wake vortex turbulence, created by departing and arriving aircraft in the vicinity of airports. We are developing this sensor to be a component of a wake vortex advisory system, known as WVAS, that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, or NASA, is developing. We believe that our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor, upon completion and deployment in concert with other components of WVAS, can:

     *     Improve the safety of aircraft arrivals and departures;

     *     Streamline the air traffic control process;

     *     Reduce passenger delays; and

     *     Generate substantial cost savings for the airline industry and other airport users.

     A "proof of principle" test of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor was conducted at JFK International Airport in May 1998. We completed controlled testing of an expanded and improved SOCRATES wake vortex sensor, using a NASA Boeing 757 as the source aircraft, at Langley Air Force Base in December 2000. In September 2003, we completed a three-week test of an improved SOCRATES wake vortex sensor at Denver International Airport. Based upon our analysis of initial data, this test demonstrated a major increase in the capability and reliability of the sensor. We have conducted research, development, and testing of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor in conjunction with Lockheed Martin Corporation pursuant to a ten-year teaming agreement dated May 1, 1997 under which we are the prime contractor.

     We also are developing a collision avoidance and ground proximity warning system for small aircraft based on our technology referred to as UNICORN (Universal Collision Obviation and Reduced Near-Miss). We recently received a frequency assignment from the Federal Communications Commission for experimental purposes and development of UNICORN and have signed a contract with Georgia Tech Applied Research Corporation, or GTARC, under which GTARC has commenced work on the construction of our UNICORN antenna elements. We plan to integrate the antenna with electronics, displays, and processing elements into a collision alerting and ground proximity warning system aimed at the general aviation market. We also have begun exploring the application of this technology to unmanned air vehicles and other specialized commercial and government flight operations.

     Since our inception, our primary source of funding and revenues has been three successive contracts with the federal government aggregating approximately $13 million for research, development and testing of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor. We have not had any revenues from commercial sales and we do not expect such sales for several years.

     Unless the context indicates otherwise, all share and per-share information in this prospectus assumes no exercise of:

     *     the public warrants;
     *     the over-allotment option to purchase up to ___ units;
     *     warrants to purchase up to ___ units granted to the representative in connection with this offering; and
     *     outstanding options and warrants to purchase a total of 2,202,023 shares of common stock, which have a weighted average exercise price of $2.00 per share.

     In the table below, we provide you with historical selected consolidated financial data for the two years ended May 31, 2003 and 2002, derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We also provide below financial data for, and as of the end of, the first fiscal quarters of 2004 and 2003, derived from our unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period. When you read this historical selected financial data, it is important that you read along with it the historical consolidated financial statements and related notes and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation" included elsewhere in this prospectus.

     The table below sets forth a summary of our consolidated balance sheet data as of May 31, 2003, derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We also provide below financial data for, and as of the end of, the first fiscal quarter of 2004, derived from our unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus on an actual basis and on a pro forma basis. Pro forma data assume the receipt of approximately $8,700,000 in net proceeds from this offering.

     Investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below together with all of the other information included in this prospectus before making an investment decision. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer. In that case, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

     Our limited operating history and lack of commercial operations make it difficult to evaluate our prospects.

     Since we began operations in 1997, we have generated limited revenues solely from three SOCRATES technology research and development contracts with agencies of the federal government that fund, administer, and oversee these contracts. The federal government has funded these contracts from earmarked U.S. Congressional appropriations to agencies that have awarded these contracts to us on a sole source basis without competitive bidding. Under these contracts, we are reimbursed for certain allowable R&D costs and are paid a fee calculated as a percentage of costs.

     We have not as yet received any revenue from the sale of any products. We do not anticipate receiving any such revenue unless and until our SOCRATES or UNICORN-based products become operational, which could take several years. Our estimates of the market size for the products we are developing are based on many assumptions and uncertainties. These estimates have not been evaluated by any third party. The actual markets for our products, if and when we successfully complete their development, could be substantially less than our estimates. It therefore is difficult to assess our prospects for commercial sales, revenues and profitability.

     To date, we have incurred significant net losses, including net losses of $943,974 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2003. On May 31, 2003, we had an accumulated deficit of $2,460,023. We anticipate that we may continue to incur significant operating losses for the next several years. We may never generate material revenues or achieve or maintain profitability. Substantially all our revenues have been devoted to payment of costs incurred in the research, development, and testing of our SOCRATES or UNICORN technology. Our ability to achieve, maintain, and/or increase profitability will depend in large part upon the successful further development and testing of our SOCRATES or UNICORN-based products, our ability to procure Congressional appropriations and obtain federal R&D contracts for SOCRATES, our ability to obtain additional financing, FAA approval of our SOCRATES or UNICORN-based products and systems by various agencies of the federal government, acquisition of our products and systems by airports and the aviation industry, and the availability of funding to finance such acquisitions.

     Without notice to, or opportunity for prior review by us, the John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center of the U. S. Department of Transportation's Research and Special Programs Administration, or Volpe, circulated a draft report in October 2001 which recommended curtailing further government expenditure on our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor due to a high risk assessment of achieving operational feasibility. Because of this report and the events of September 11, 2001, the government did not fund our SOCRATES research and development contract from December 15, 2001 to November 19, 2002. Together with our major subcontractor, Lockheed Martin Corporation, we vigorously disputed and extensively discussed its assertions with Volpe and

NASA. To our knowledge, Volpe did not issue a final report, and Volpe and NASA requested and we submitted a proposal for approximately $2.2 million of additional SOCRATES technology research, development and testing with an immediate objective of better characterizing the wake acoustics and background noise. In November 2002, Volpe approved and funded a work order in the amount of $1,229,650 for the first phase of this proposal, and in March 2003, a second work order was approved and funded in the amount of $991,418. On September 19, 2003, we received notice of our third successive sole source contract from Volpe for an aggregate of $3,975,000.

     We believe the federal government has indicated a long-term interest in the development of a wake vortex advisory system and our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor for inclusion in such a system. However, the federal government has in the past delayed or reduced and may in the future delay, reduce, or eliminate funding for R&D of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor or the wake vortex advisory system as a result of, among other things, a reduction in support or opposition from supervising agencies, changes in budgetary priorities or decisions to fund competing systems or components of systems. If this occurs, it will reduce our resources available for R&D of our proprietary technologies new products or enhancements to SOCRATES or UNICORN technologies and to market our products. Reduction of contract funding from the federal government could delay achievement of or increases in profitability, create a substantial strain on our liquidity, resources and product development, and have a material adverse effect on the progress of our R&D and our financial condition.

     Our future success will depend upon our ability to successfully complete the development, testing, and commercialization of our technologies and our ability to develop and introduce new products and services to meet industry, government, and client requirements. We are planning to eventually develop a number of products, based on our SOCRATES and UNICORN technologies. The process of developing such products contains significant technological and engineering hurdles and is extremely complex and expensive. We might not successfully complete the development of any of our products in a timely fashion and our products may not be commercially viable. Our failure to complete development of any such products and achieve market acceptance would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

     In addition, certain of our products will require customized installation to address unique characteristics of their environments. Customization could place an additional burden on our resources or delay the delivery or installation of products which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our relationship with clients, our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

     The airport and aviation industry is subject to extensive government oversight and regulation. To introduce our SOCRATES and UNICORN-based products for commercial sale, we must successfully complete research, development, and testing and obtain necessary governmental approvals for their installation. Upon approval by the Federal Aviation Administration, or FAA, our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor would be part of a multi-component wake vortex advisory system that also will require government approvals before it can be deployed. Any factor that delays or adversely affects this process, including delays in development or inability to obtain necessary government approvals, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

     In May 1997, we signed a Teaming Agreement with Lockheed Martin Corporation to jointly develop and market SOCRATES-based products. This agreement will expire in May 2007, unless certain earlier termination provisions occur or the agreement is extended by mutual agreement. The agreement stipulates that we serve as prime contractor and Lockheed Martin as subcontractor. Although to date we have generally worked in close cooperation with Lockheed Martin, there is no assurance that this relationship will be sustained. Future disagreements as to work

scope, revenue share, profit margins, ownership of intellectual property, or technical, marketing, or management philosophy, could adversely impact the relationship. Since we view our strategic partnership with Lockheed Martin as a vital element of our business plan, any erosion of this relationship could have a negative impact on our business and future value.

     Given the uncertainties of R&D and the timing of commercialization of our SOCRATES and UNICORN-based products, the availability and level of government funding, the FAA approvals required for our products, and the long sales cycle from initial customer contact to actual, if any, revenue generation, we might not be able to generate sufficient, if any, revenue or investment capital to fund our operations over the period of years required to commercialize our products. In each of our last three fiscal years, we have suffered substantial operating losses which we have funded, in part, with equity capital that we raised from new investors.

     We will continue to incur significant expenses for R&D and testing of our SOCRATES and UNICORN technology and may continue to suffer such losses prior to commercialization and thereafter. If we cannot achieve commercialization of our SOCRATES and UNICORN technologies with the proceeds of this offering or if we are unable to generate sufficient working capital from revenue from government funding or private contracts for these purposes, we would need to seek additional capital. In addition, other unforeseen costs and R&D costs of later generation SOCRATES and UNICORN-based products also could require us to seek additional capital. We do not have any credit facilities in place and, should the need for additional capital arise, we may not be able to obtain sufficient, if any, additional capital or raise such capital on acceptable terms. If we need to obtain additional debt or equity capital, it may include our entry into joint ventures or issuance of additional stock, which may cause dilution to our current capital structure and stockholders' ownership. Additional stock also could have a greater priority as to dividends, distributions and other rights than our common stock.

     Our future success depends to a significant degree on the skills, experience and efforts of our executive officers, Samuel A. Kovnat, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, William B. Cotton, President and Director, Frank L. Rees, Executive Vice President and Director, and David D. Cryer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. The sustained unavailability of any one or more of those individuals for any reason could have a material adverse impact on our operations and prospects. We anticipate hiring additional executive officers in the future. We may not be able to complete the hiring of these additional officers in a timely manner or at all. We also depend on the ability of our executive officers and other members of senior management to continue to work effectively as a team.

     As a result of receiving contract funding from the federal government and our involvement in the field of aviation, our business and operations are subject to numerous government laws and regulations. In the near term, and for so long as we receive funding from the federal government, we will be subject to many procurement and accounting rules and regulations of the federal government. We are also subject to periodic audits by the Defense Contract Audit Agency, or DCAA. To date, we have incurred four audits by the DCAA, and reports have been issued to our government customer which have stated that we are performing in accordance with Federal Acquisitions Regulations. There is no assurance that any of the results or contents of any future audits will portray us favorably. These rules and regulations are complex in nature and sometimes difficult to interpret or apply. Adherence to these rules is reviewed by participating agencies of the federal government. If such agencies suspect or believe that violations of procurement or accounting rules and regulations have occurred, they may refer such matters to other enforcement divisions of the federal government, such as the U.S. Attorney's Office or the Inspector

General's office. If we violate these rules and regulations, even if unintentionally, we may have to pay fines and penalties or, in severe cases, could be terminated from receiving further funding from the federal government. If we market, sell and install our products in foreign countries, the laws, rules and regulations of those countries, as well as certain laws of the United States, will apply to us. Existing as well as new laws and regulations of the United States and foreign countries which regulate aviation and airports could also adversely affect our business.

     Any failure by us to protect our intellectual property could harm our business and competitive position. For example, although we have sought patent protection for our technologies, the steps we have taken or intend to take with regard to patenting our technologies may not be adequate to defend and prevent misappropriation of our technology, including the possibility of reverse engineering and the possibility that potential competitors will independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology. Furthermore, any patent we have obtained or will obtain may subsequently be invalidated for any of a variety of reasons. In addition, even if we are issued a patent, we may not be able to gain any commercial advantage from such patent. Existing United States laws afford only limited intellectual property protection.

     We intend to use a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark law, nondisclosure agreements, and technical measures to protect our proprietary technology. We intend to enter into confidentiality agreements with all of our employees, as well as with our clients and potential clients, and intend to limit access to and distribution of our technology, documentation and other proprietary information. However, the steps we take in this regard may not be adequate to deter misappropriation or independent third-party development of our technology. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary technology rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. If we resort to legal proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights, the proceedings could be burdensome and expensive and could involve a high degree of risk to our proprietary rights if we are unsuccessful in such proceedings. Moreover, our financial resources may not be adequate to enforce or defend our rights in our technology. Additionally, any patents that we apply for or obtain may not be broad enough to protect all of the technology important to our business, and our ownership of patents does not in itself prevent others from securing patents that may block us from engaging in actions necessary to our business, products, or services.

     If our proprietary technology violates or is alleged to violate third party proprietary rights, we may be required to reengineer our technology or seek to obtain licenses from third parties to continue offering our technology without substantial reengineering. Any such efforts may not be successful or if successful could require payments that could have a material adverse effect on our profitability and financial condition. Also, litigation is expensive and time-consuming, and an adverse outcome may result in payment of damages or injunctive relief that could materially and adversely affect our business.

     At present, we cannot precisely fix a price for the sale and installation of an initial SOCRATES- wake vortex sensor at airports or UNICORN-based collision avoidance systems in small aircraft. We estimate that the cost of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor will be $10 to $20 million per airport installation, depending on, among other things, the number and configuration of runways, and the cost of a UNICORN-based system will be approximately $10,000 per aircraft. Because we have not completed the research, development, and testing of either product or received final approvals for either of them from the federal government, we have not commenced production or marketing efforts. We currently do not anticipate having these products ready for commercial sale for several years. We therefore are not yet in a position to gauge the reaction of potential customers to the pricing of these products or future products and whether such potential customers will be able to afford and finance our products.

     We believe that the increase in efficiency and safety to airports, airlines, and private aircraft resulting from our products will justify the substantial anticipated cost of sales and installation of these products. However, our customers' ability to afford such costs will depend, in part, on the health of the overall economy, the financial condition and budget priorities of the federal government, particularly the FAA and NASA, profitability of airports, airlines, and aircraft manufacturers, and the availability of private and government sources of funding to finance the sales and acquisition of our products. While a variety of potential funding sources exist, inability of the FAA, airlines or airports to access or obtain funding for purchase and installation of our products could have a material adverse impact on sales of our SOCRATES or UNICORN-based products.

     We expect to experience long time periods between initial sales contacts and the execution of formal contracts for our products and completion of product installations. The cycle from first contract to revenue generation in our business involves, among other things, selling the concept of our technology and products; developing and implementing a pilot program to demonstrate the capabilities and accuracy of our products; negotiating prices and other contract terms; and, finally, installing and implementing our products on a full-scale basis. We anticipate this cycle will entail a substantial period of time, on average between seven to twelve months, and the lack of revenue experienced during this cycle and the expenses involved in bringing new sales to the point of revenue generation may put a substantial strain on our resources.

     At present and for the near future, we will depend upon a relatively small number of employees and subcontractors to complete the R&D of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor and pursue R&D of other SOCRATES and UNICORN-based products. The marketing and sales of these products will require us to find additional capable employees or contractors who can understand, explain, market, and sell our technology and products to airports, airlines, and airplane manufacturers. We also will need to assemble new personnel and/or contractors for production and installation of our products. Upon successful completion of R&D, these demands will require us to rapidly increase the number of our employees, vendors, and subcontractors. There is intense competition for capable personnel in all of these areas, and we may not be successful in attracting, integrating, motivating, or retaining new personnel, vendors, or subcontractors for these required functions.

     Products and systems as complex as ours may contain undetected errors or "bugs," which result in system failures, or failure to perform in accordance with industry expectations. Despite our plans for quality control and testing measures, our products including any enhancements may contain such bugs or exhibit performance degradation, particularly during the early stages of installation, and deployment. Product or system performance problems could result in loss of or delay in revenue, loss of market share, failure to achieve market acceptance, adverse publicity, injury to our reputation, diversion of development resources and claims against us by the federal government, airlines, and airline customers.

     Sale of our products will depend on their ability to improve airport, airline, and airplane safety and efficiency. We will take great care to test our products and systems after installation and before actual operation to insure accuracy and reliability. The FAA acquires air traffic control equipment for U.S. airports, and typically assumes the principal product liability risk for such equipment. However, unforeseen problems, misuse, or changing conditions could cause our products and systems to malfunction or exhibit other operational problems. Such problems could cause, or be perceived to cause, airplane accidents, including passenger fatalities. We may receive significant liability claims if the federal government, airlines, airports, passengers and other parties believe that our systems

have failed to perform their intended functions. Liability claims could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation, pay substantial damages, and increase insurance premiums, regardless of our responsibility for such failure. Although we plan to maintain liability insurance, such coverage may not continue to be available on reasonable terms or be available in amounts sufficient to cover one or more large claims, and the insurer may disclaim coverage as to any claim.

     The air safety systems and air traffic control industries are already highly competitive. Other industry participants could develop or improve their own systems to achieve the cost efficiencies and value that we believe our products are capable of providing. Additional companies may enter the market with competing systems as the size and visibility of the market opportunity increases. Many of our potential competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, management, service, support, and other resources than we do. Therefore, they may be able to respond more quickly than we can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards, or customer requirements.

     New products or technologies will likely increase the competitive pressures that we face. Increased competition could result in pricing pressures, reduced margins, or the failure of our products to achieve or maintain market acceptance. The development of competing products or technologies by market participants or the emergence of new industry or government standards may adversely affect our competitive position. As a result of these and other factors, we may be unable to compete effectively with current or future competitors. Such inability would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

     Our business in general is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product and service introductions and enhancements, uncertain product life cycles, changes in customer requirements, and evolving industry standards which make us susceptible to technological obsolescence. The introduction of new products embodying new technologies, the emergence of new industry standards, or improvements to existing technologies could render our products and systems obsolete or relatively less competitive. Our future success will depend upon our ability to continue to develop and introduce a variety of new products and to address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers. We may experience delays in releasing new products and systems or enhancements in the future. Material delays in introducing new products and systems or enhancements may cause customers to forego purchases of our products and systems and purchase products and systems of competitors instead.

     To implement our strategy, we believe that we will have to grow rapidly. Rapid growth may strain our management, financial, and other resources. To manage any future growth effectively, we must expand our sales, marketing, production, installation, and customer support organizations, invest in R&D of new products or enhancements to existing systems that meet changing customer needs, enhance our financial and accounting systems and controls, integrate new personnel or contractors, and successfully manage expanded operations. We may not be able to effectively manage and coordinate our growth so as to achieve or maximize future profitability.

     Our success depends in large part upon our ability to attract, train, motivate, and retain highly skilled employees, particularly sales and marketing personnel, scientists, engineers, and other technical support personnel. Our failure to attract and retain the highly trained technical personnel that are integral to our direct sales, product development, installation, support, and professional services may limit the rate at which we can generate sales or develop new products or system enhancements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

     We may attempt to acquire businesses or technologies that we believe are a strategic fit with our business. We currently have no commitments for any material acquisition. Any future acquisition may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures, and may absorb significant management attention that would otherwise be available for ongoing development of our business. Since we may not be able to accurately predict these difficulties and expenditures, these costs may outweigh the value we realize from a future acquisition. Future acquisitions could result in issuances of equity securities that would reduce our stockholders' ownership interest, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, amortization of expenses related to other intangible assets and the incurrence of large, immediate write-offs.

     The market price of the securities of a pre-commercial, research and development stage aviation technology company, such as ours, can be especially volatile. Thus, the market price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations. In fact, the trading volume and price of our shares have fluctuated greatly. Subject to the information set forth in this prospectus, we are unaware of any specific reasons for this volatility and cannot predict whether or when it will continue.

     If our revenues do not grow or grow more slowly than we anticipate, we are unable to procure federal contracts for our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor research and development, we encounter technical or engineering obstacles to the successful commercial development of SOCRATES or UNICORN, operating or capital expenditures exceed our expectations and cannot be adjusted accordingly, or if some other event adversely affects us, the market price of our common stock could decline. In addition, if the market for aviation technology stocks or the stock market in general experiences a loss in investor confidence or otherwise fails, the market price of our common stock could fall for reasons unrelated to our business, results of operations, and financial condition. The market price of our stock also might decline in reaction to events that affect other companies in our industry even if these events do not directly affect us. Furthermore, the sale in the open market of recently sold common shares or newly issued common shares, which we may sell from time to time to raise funds for various purposes, and common shares issuable upon the exercise of purchase rights under existing options and warrants may place downward pressure on the market price of our common shares.

     Speculative traders may anticipate a decline in the market price of our common shares and engage in short sales of our common shares. Such short sales could further negatively affect the market price of our common shares.

     Companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been the subject of securities class action litigation. If we were to become the subject of securities class action litigation, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management's attention and resources.

     There is a limited trading market for our common stock. Since January 2002, our common stock has been traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, an inter-dealer automated quotation system for equity securities. We plan to list the units, shares and public warrants we sell in this offering, together with the shares currently trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, on the American Stock Exchange as soon as and if we can meet the qualifications for such a listing. However, regardless of which exchange our securities may trade on, an active and liquid trading market may not develop or, if developed, may not be sustained, which could limit stockholders' ability to sell our securities at a desired price.

     Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock or other securities in the public markets, or the perception that these sales may occur, could cause the market price of our common stock or other securities to decline and could materially impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional securities. After this offering, we will have ___________ shares of our common stock outstanding (including shares of our common stock comprising a part of the units that are the subject of this offering but excluding shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the public warrants comprising a part of those units), or __________ shares (including shares of our common stock comprising a part of the units that are the subject of this offering but excluding shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the public warrants comprising a part of those units) if the underwriters' over-allotment is exercised in full. We anticipate approximately __________ of the shares will have been registered and eligible for public trading. The __________ units sold in this offering, or ___________ units if the underwriters' over-allotment is exercised in full, will be freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the federal securities laws unless purchased by our affiliates. Not included in the foregoing are 377,031 shares of our common stock that we may register for certain of our stockholders.

     Of the remaining 15,901,233 shares of our common stock outstanding after this offering, based upon shares outstanding as of August 31, 2003, and assuming no exercise of options or warrants outstanding as of such date prior to completion of this offering, 3,537,874 shares are subject to contractual lock-up agreements with Paulson Investment Company, Inc., pursuant to which the holders of such shares have agreed not to sell their shares for 90 days after the effective date of this offering. Of the remaining shares, unless held by "affiliates," 3,826,325 will be freely tradable after September 1, 2004 and 294,126 will be freely tradable after June 27, 2005.

     As of August 31, 2003, we had 15,901,233 shares of common stock outstanding and 2,202,023 common stock equivalents outstanding, including warrants and options. The exercise price of all common stock equivalents is $2.00 per share. Some of these warrants and options may provide antidilution protection to their holders which would result in our issuance of shares in addition to those under the warrant or option, upon the occurrence of sales of our common stock below certain prices, stock splits, redemptions, mergers, and other similar transactions. Furthermore, from time to time we may issue additional shares of common stock in private or public transactions to raise funds for working capital, R&D, acquisitions, or other purposes. If one or more of these events occurs, the number of outstanding shares of our common stock would increase and dilute your percentage ownership of our common stock.

     For you to be able to exercise the public warrants, the shares of our common stock underlying the public warrants must be covered by an effective and current registration statement and qualify or be exempt under the securities laws of the state or other jurisdiction in which you live. We cannot assure you that we will continue to maintain a current registration statement relating to the shares of our common stock underlying the public warrants or that an exemption from registration or qualification will be available throughout their term. This may have an adverse effect on demand for the public warrants and the prices that can be obtained from reselling them.

     We may redeem the public warrants for $0.25 per warrant, subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split, dividend or the like, on 30 days' notice at any time after the last reported sale price per share of our common stock as reported by the principal exchange or trading facility on which our common stock trades equals or exceeds $_____ for five consecutive trading days. If

we give notice of redemption, holders of our public warrants will be forced to sell or exercise the public warrants they hold or accept the redemption price. The notice of redemption could come at a time when, under specific circumstances or generally, it is not advisable or possible to sell or exercise the public warrants.

     Our current officers, directors and 5% stockholders, in the aggregate, control approximately 36.5% of our outstanding common stock prior to this offering. As a result, these stockholders acting together will be able to exert significant control over matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, approval of mergers, and other significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership could delay, prevent, or deter a change in control, and could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their stock as part of a sale of us and could affect the market price of our stock.

     We have never paid cash dividends on our stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

     The use of proceeds from this offering reflects our current planning and is only an estimate that is subject to change in our discretion. Furthermore, a substantial portion of the net proceeds from this offering is not allocated for specific uses. Consequently, our management can spend offering proceeds in ways with which our stockholders may not agree. We cannot predict that the proceeds will be invested or otherwise utilized to yield a favorable return. See "Use of Proceeds."

     We estimate that the net proceeds from the sale of the __________ units that we are selling in this offering will be approximately $8,700,000 based on an initial public offering price of $_____ per unit and after deducting $1,000,000, reflecting the estimated underwriting discount and non-accountable expense allowance, and $300,000, reflecting the estimated offering expenses payable by us. If the underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full, we estimate that we will receive net proceeds of approximately $____________.

     We expect to use the net proceeds of this offering approximately as follows:

     We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering to develop our proprietary SOCRATES technology as follows:

     *   Acceleration of research and development to reach the operation readiness date for our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor sooner than with government funding alone;

     *   Integration of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor with other weather measurement, prediction and alerting tools into a full wake vortex advisory system;

     *   Performance of operation trials of a wake vortex advisory system leading to FAA commissioning and site adaptation of such systems, including our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor, for individual airport sales;

     *   Worldwide promotion and marketing of a wake vortex advisory system containing our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor; and

     *   Investigation and preliminary design of other new products employing our SOCRATES technology, for both aircraft and airport use.

     We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering to develop our proprietary UNICORN technology as follows:

     *   Acceleration of research and development to reach FAA certification sooner than with presently available funding;

     *   Integration of our UNICORN antenna subsystem with existing and new displays and alerting devices, and threat logic software;

     *   Compliance with required FAA tests for certification of a UNICORN-based product for general aviation aircraft;

     *   Internal efforts plus partnering arrangements with avionics and aircraft manufacturers; and

     *   Shared funding efforts with government agencies to develop our UNICORN technology for unmanned air vehicles and other specialized government applications.

     The above amounts are our current estimate of the allocation of the net proceeds. Because the future of our business is difficult to predict, it is likely that the actual amounts used for these purposes will vary significantly from our current estimates. Also, we may use offering proceeds for purposes not listed above in response to cash requirements or business opportunities that we do not now anticipate. In particular, we may use offering proceeds to acquire other businesses or technologies. Any such use could reduce proceeds available for the uses described above. Although we evaluate potential acquisitions in the ordinary course of business, we have no specific understandings, commitments or agreements to make any acquisition or investment at this time.

     Until we use the net proceeds of this offering in our business, we intend to invest the funds in short-term, investment grade, interest-bearing securities. We cannot predict whether the proceeds invested will yield a favorable return.

     We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. For the foreseeable future, we intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon then existing conditions, including our financial condition and results of operations, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, business prospects, and other factors that our Board of Directors considers relevant.

     The following table sets forth our capitalization as of May 31, 2003, derived form our audited consolidated financial statements found elsewhere in this prospectus. The table also sets forth our capitalization as of August 31, 2003, derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements found elsewhere in this prospectus on an actual basis and on an a pro forma basis. Pro forma data assume the receipt of $8,700,000 in net proceeds from this offering.

     On January 14, 2002, our common stock became eligible to trade on the NASD Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board, or OTCBB, under the symbol RELS. No reported trades of the stock on the OTCBB occurred prior to July 21, 2002. Effective September 6, 2002, the symbol changed to FLST. As of August 31, 2003, we have 15,901,233 shares of common stock outstanding and approximately 8,214,595 of those shares currently trade on the OTCBB and in Europe on the Berlin Stock Exchange under the symbol "FLH." The following chart shows the high and low sales price of our common stock for each fiscal quarter since public trading started as quoted on the OTCBB:

     The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

     As of September 8, 2003, we had approximately 119 record holders of our common stock, as reflected on the books of our transfer agent. A significant number of shares were held in street name and, as such, we believe that the actual number of beneficial owners is significantly higher.

     In the table below, we provide you with historical selected consolidated financial data for the two years ended May 31, 2003 and 2002, derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We also provide below financial data for, and as of the end of, the first fiscal quarter of 2004, derived from our unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus on an actual basis and on a pro forma basis. Pro forma data assume the receipt of approximately $8,700,000 in net proceeds from this offering. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period or for a full year. When you read this historical selected financial data, it is important that you read along with it the historical consolidated financial statements and related notes and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this prospectus.

     Our current operations, including those previously conducted by our former subsidiary, have been funded substantially by U.S. Congressional appropriations resulting in three successive sole source contracts with agencies of the federal government for research, development, and testing of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor and related work pertaining to a wake vortex advisory system, sometimes known as WVAS, that NASA is developing. The appropriations to the FAA totaled $9.6 million in fiscal 1997 through 2000 for research and development of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor; and NASA appropriations for research and development of our SOCRATES wake

vortex sensor totaled $13.5 million in fiscal 2001 through 2003. From these amounts, we have received approximately $13.1 million in contract funding. As of August 31, 2003, we have recognized an aggregate of approximately $8.4 million of contract revenue, of which we have been paid $8.1 million. Our current SOCRATES government contract backlog is approximately $4.7 million.

     We have entered into these contracts with the John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center of the U.S. Department of Transportation's Research and Special Programs Administration, or Volpe. Volpe funds our contracts when, as, and if it and other sponsoring federal agencies approve a statement of work and specific task orders under the statement of work. When funded, we invoice the federal government monthly based on our direct costs, including overhead and general and administrative plus a fixed fee for that month and typically receive payment by electronic wire transfer within two weeks of invoicing. Certain costs, such as lobbying, financing costs, and marketing and advertising expenses, that are not allowable under these contracts, costs we incur over certain cost caps set by the U.S. government, or costs incurred between contract fundings, all of which are "non-contract costs", are not reimbursable under our government contracts and have been funded primarily by proceeds of two private equity placements.

     Without notice to, or opportunity for prior review by us, Volpe circulated a draft report in October 2001 which recommended curtailing further government expenditure on our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor due to a high risk assessment of achieving operational feasibility. Together with our major subcontractor, Lockheed Martin Corporation, we vigorously disputed and extensively discussed its assertions with Volpe and NASA. To our knowledge, Volpe did not issue a final report, and Volpe and NASA requested and we submitted a proposal for approximately $2.2 million of additional SOCRATES wake vortex sensor research, development and testing with an immediate objective of better characterizing the wake acoustics and background noise. In November 2002, Volpe approved and funded a new work order in the amount of $1,229,650 for the first phase of this proposal and in March 2003, a second work order was approved and funded in the amount of $991,418. Included in the funding is a 7% fixed fee over and above our research and development costs plus overhead, general and administrative costs. The statement of work continues our previous contract to develop and test our Socrates wake vortex sensor. This funding ended an 11-month period, from December 15, 2001 to November 19, 2002, without government funding to develop our Socrates wake vortex sensor.

     On September 19, 2003, we received notice of our third successive sole source contract from Volpe for an aggregate of $3.975 million. This contract initially has been funded from a FY 2003 Omnibus Appropriation of $4.5 million to the NASA budget for research, development and testing of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor as part of a NASA/DOT/FAA development of WVAS for use at major airports.

     The net loss for the quarter ended August 31, 2003 of $226,641 compares favorably to the net loss of $254,025 for the quarter ended August 31, 2002. These results are explained in more detail by the following factors.

     Revenues. Contract revenues for the three-month periods ended August 31, 2003 and 2002 were $532,215 and $0, respectively. These results principally reflect the lack of government contract funding for our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor during the three-month period ended August 31, 2002.

     Direct Contract Costs. Direct contract costs for the three-month period ended August 31, 2003 were $358,884, compared to $0 for the three-month period ended August 31, 2002. These results principally reflect the lack of government contract funding during the three-month period ended August 31, 2002.

     Operating Expenses. Government contractors are required to categorize operating expenses as overhead expenses or general and administrative expenses. These two indirect "cost pools" are then divided by their appropriate "direct cost base" combinations of direct contract cost, which determines the contractors' overhead and general and administrative rates. These rates have been subject to ceilings established with each government contract, which currently are set at 70% for overhead and 20% for general and administrative. Our third contract included proposed provisional rates and upon award would eliminate rate ceilings during the second half of fiscal year 2004. Our historical rates are shown below.

     The above rates for the quarter ended August 31, 2003 include only allowable operating expenses. There were no rates to report for the quarter ended August 31, 2002 because there was no direct cost base as our federal contract was not funded. We believe our rates will improve and approach our current proposed provisional rates of 73% for overhead and 28% for general administration during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2004.

     Non-contract costs include: (1) expenses considered unallowable per Federal Acquisition Regulations, such as lobbying and financing costs, (2) over ceiling expenses, and (3) operating expenses incurred during periods without government contract funding. These non-contract costs are not reimbursable under our U.S. government contracts and have been paid from other sources, primarily proceeds from the private placement of our equity securities. To date, non-contract costs have been the primary use of this source of liquidity and have had a significant impact on our operating loss and liquidity to date. Non-contract costs are detailed below.

     Unallowable expenses for the three-month period ended August 31, 2003 increased over the three-month period ended in 2002 primarily due to increased lobbying and marketing expenses. Lobbying expense was $60,988 for that period in 2003, compared to $32,264 for that period in 2002. Marketing expense was $29,494 for that period in 2003, compared to $0 in 2002. Unallowable expenses includes $8,396 and $6,138 of stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended August 31, 2003 and August 31, 2002, respectively.

     Overhead and general administrative expenses for the three-month period ended August 31, 2003 totaled $239,865 compared to $197,152 for the three-month period ended August 31, 2002. This increase is primarily due to an increase in legal fees from $12,386 in 2002 to $58,084 in 2003, reflecting the SEC periodic reporting requirements associated with operating as a public company.

     Over-ceiling expenses of $99,735 for the period ended August 31, 2003 represents 42% of the allowable overhead and general administrative expenses. The remaining 58% of overhead and general administrative expenses for the period of $140,130 was absorbed and billed as part of our costs on our government contract. During the same quarter last year, there was no absorption of these expenses as this was an unfunded period. Accordingly, we reported these expenses in the category of operating expenses during unfunded periods in the chart shown above.

     Over-ceiling expenses and operating expenses during unfunded periods fluctuate from period to period due to the timing of unfunded periods. Based on our current contract backlog, we expect to be funded through May 31, 2004 which should eliminate the operating expenses during unfunded period category for all of fiscal 2004.

     The net loss for fiscal 2003 of $943,974 compares unfavorably to the net loss of $809,100 in fiscal 2002 and to the net loss of $521,951 in fiscal 2001. Our increased net losses for fiscal 2003 and 2002 resulted primarily from an 11-month delay, including approximately five and one-half months during fiscal 2003 and five and one-half months during fiscal 2002 in government contract funding for our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor research and development. This delay was caused, in part, by the draft Volpe report as well as the general slow down in the federal bureaucratic process which followed the national tragedy that occurred on September 11, 2001. These results are explained in more detail by the following factors.

     Revenues. To date, our revenues have consisted almost entirely of revenues earned from two of our three successive SOCRATES wake vortex sensor research and development contracts with the federal government. Revenues under our government contracts are booked as contract sales when earned.

     Contract revenue for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2003 was $1,093,097. This was a significant increase compared to $490,031, which included a reduction of $185,005 of accrued contract revenue for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002. These results principally reflect the lack of government contract funding for the SOCRATES wake vortex sensor during the eleven month period ending November 19, 2002 and a larger amount of contract work that we completed and billed in fiscal 2003.

     Direct Contract Costs. Subcontractor, consultant and direct labor expenses comprise our direct contract costs. We resumed work on our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor government contract on November 20, 2002. For the 12 months ended May 31, 2003, direct contract costs of $799,259 compare to $460,244 of such costs for the 12 months ended May 31, 2002. These results principally reflect the 11-month delay in funding under our current government contract and a larger amount of contract work that we completed and billed in fiscal 2003.

     When our government contract is funded, changes in direct costs do not generally impact our operating income because each contract covers its own direct costs. However, during periods when our government contract is not funded, any such costs we may incur are not reimbursable and must be funded from our own resources.

     The above rates for each of the fiscal year ends include only allowable operating expenses and have fluctuated over time. We believe these rates will improve and approach our current proposed, SOCRATES Phase III, rates of 73% for overhead and 28% for general administration during the fiscal 2004.

     Non-contract costs include: (1) expenses considered unallowable per Federal Acquisition Regulations, such as lobbying and financing costs, (2) over-ceiling expenses, and (3) operating expenses incurred during periods without government contract funding. These non-contract costs are not reimbursable under our U.S. government contracts and must be paid from other sources, primarily proceeds from the private placement of our equity securities to date. To date, non-contract costs have been the primary use of this source of liquidity and have had a significant impact on our operating loss and liquidity for fiscal 2002 and 2003 to date. Non-contract costs are detailed below:

     Unallowable expenses for the 12-month period ended May 31, 2003 increased over those for the same period ending in 2002 because of increased lobbying and public relations expenses and an increase in stock-based compensation in fiscal 2003 ($65,146) compared to fiscal 2002 ($24,522). Lobbying expenses were $104,818 in fiscal 2003 compared to $65,696 of such expenses in fiscal 2002 and public relations expenses were $81,119 in fiscal 2003 compared to $0 in fiscal 2002. The increases reflect our focus on acquiring appropriate R&D funding from the federal government, as well as the expenses associated with operating as a public company. Unallowable expenses include $65,146 and $24,522 of stock-based compensation expense for the 12 months ended May 31, 2003 and May 31, 2002.

     Over-ceiling expenses during unfunded periods fluctuate from period to period due to the duration and timing of unfunded periods. While funded and unfunded periods in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 were approximately the same, we experienced a $194,821 increase in over-ceiling expenses in fiscal 2003 over fiscal 2002 due to increased legal and professional expenses ($202,832 in 2003 compared to $74,052 in 2002) and general and administrative salaries and wages ($174,293 in 2003 compared to $126,763 in 2002). Both of these increases are due to SEC reporting requirements and stockholder relations activities.

     Operating expenses during unfunded periods reflect fixed overhead and they are approximately the same for fiscal 2003 ($390,160) and fiscal 2002 ($361,317). We expect our federal contract to be funded through May 31, 2004, which should eliminate the latter expense category through the end of fiscal 2004.

     Our sources of liquidity, which we define as our ability to generate cash to fund our operations, are primarily provided by revenue from our government contracts and proceeds from the sale of our equity securities.

     Our funded contract backlog on our second DOT/Volpe contract as of August 31, 2003 was $604,796. We received notice of a new contract from DOT/Volpe on September 19, 2003. This contract, titled Phase III SOCRATES, is the third successive contract that we have received to continue work on our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor. The new contract is initially funded at $3.975 million and will be used to expand our current SOCRATES wake vortex sensor from its present four-beam configuration, which was recently tested at the Denver International Airports, to eight or more beams plus other improvements. Together with our partner, Lockheed Martin Corporation, we are developing our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor as a candidate sensor for a wake vortex advisory system that NASA is developing. The funds were provided to Volpe from NASA's Aeronautical Research Program which is aimed at improving aviation safety and capacity. These funds were part of a Congressional Appropriation for federal FY 2003.

     As of August 31, 2003 and August 31, 2002, our cash was, respectively, $2,261,736 and $125,956. The increase in cash on hand as of August 31, 2003 over August 31, 2002 was attributable to a private placement of 850,000 shares of common stock that netted us $1,529,643 on September 1, 2002, plus $1,700,000 of proceeds from exercise of 850,000 common stock warrants, less the operating losses for the period from September 1, 2002 to August 31, 2003 and capital additions in the three-month period ended August 31, 2003. This capital addition consisted primarily of the purchase of four company cars for our executive officers that aggregated $150,000.

     As of August 31, 2003, we had contract receivables of $229,993, compared to $0 for the same period in 2002. The increase resulted from resumption of funding for our federal contract in November 2002.

     As of August 31, 2003, we had total current liabilities, including accounts payable, of $391,411, compared to $422,992 of total current liabilities as of August 31, 2002, which included $195,000 on our line of credit which was cancelled on September 4, 2002. Accounts payable as of August 31, 2003 were $288,597, which included $131,253 to our subcontractor, Lockheed Martin Corporation, compared to accounts payable as of August 31, 2002 of $112,486.

     We anticipate that our funded contract balance of $604,796 plus the new contract for $3.975 million, will fund our direct contract costs and allowable operating expenses until approximately May 31, 2004. During this period, we have budgeted and expect to incur approximately $500,000 in non-contract costs and an estimated $350,000 for research and development for our UNICORN technology. Assuming we operate within budget, as to which we can make no guarantee or assurance, we expect our available cash will be approximately $1,400,000. On March 21, 2003, our Board of Directors authorized us to purchase up to $200,000 of our shares on the open market or in private transactions prior to December 31, 2003. If, in our discretion, we make any such purchase, the cash we expect to be available to us on May 31, 2004 could be reduced by up to $200,000. To date, we have made no such purchase.

     From time to time, we may consider and execute strategic investments, acquisitions, or other transactions that we believe could benefit us and could require use of some or all of our liquidity. To facilitate such transactions and enhance our liquidity position for these and other purposes, such as working capital for research and development, we also may conduct from time to time various types of equity offerings, including, but not limited to, public or private offerings of common or preferred stock based on a negotiated fixed share value, or floating market price of our publicly traded shares. If we encounter delays in, or are unable to procure, contract funding from the U.S. government for further research, development and testing of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor, incur costs over budget, or make a strategic investment, our cash resources will be reduced more rapidly than we presently anticipate. In such event, we may need to obtain additional capital to maintain operations. There can be no guarantee or assurance of our future ability to obtain capital for any of the foregoing purposes and, if obtained, the terms and conditions of such capital may dilute our present stockholders' ownership.

     Effective October 3, 2002, we terminated our then current accountant, Quintanilla, a Professional Accounting Corporation, and engaged Kostin, Ruffkess & Company, LLC, which has offices in Farmington and New London, Connecticut, as our principal independent public accountant. The decision to engage Kostin, Ruffkess & Company, LLC was made by our Finance and Audit Committee in accordance with Section 301 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The decision was based on a relocation of our principal place of business from California to Connecticut.

     Quintanilla's reports on our financial statements since our inception on May 21, 2001, did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

     In connection with the audit for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, and up to the date of termination, there were no disagreements with Quintanilla on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure of auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Quintanilla would have caused Quintanilla to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement(s) in connection with its report on our financial statements.

     We had not previously consulted with Kostin, Ruffkess & Company, LLC regarding the application of accounting principles to a specific completed or contemplated transaction, or the type of audit opinion which might be rendered on our financial statements, and no written or oral advice was provided to us concluding there was an important factor to be considered by us in reaching a decision as to an accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue. Neither did we discuss with Kostin, Ruffkess & Company, LLC any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue that was a subject of disagreement between us and Quintanilla, our previous independent accountants, as there were no such disagreements.

     We are developing two proprietary technologies designed to enhance aviation safety and reduce airport delays on which we have received United States and foreign patents. Using our opto-acoustic technology, known as SOCRATES (Sensor for Optically Characterizing Remote Atmospheric Turbulence Emanating Sound), we are currently working on development of a sensor to detect and track air disturbances known as "wake vortex turbulence," created by departing and arriving aircraft in the vicinity of airports. We are developing this sensor to be a component for inclusion in a wake vortex advisory system, known as WVAS, that NASA is developing. We believe that our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor, upon completion and deployment in concert with other components of WVAS, can:

     *     Improve the safety of aircraft arrivals and departures;

     *     Streamline the air traffic control process;

     *     Reduce passenger delays; and

     *     Generate substantial cost savings for the airline industry and other airport users.

     A "proof of principle" test of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor was conducted at JFK International Airport in May 1998. We completed controlled testing of an expanded and improved SOCRATES technology, using a NASA Boeing 757 as the source aircraft, at Langley Air Force Base in December 2000. On September 13, 2003, we completed a three-week test of an improved SOCRATES wake vortex sensor at Denver International Airport. Based upon our analysis of initial data, this test demonstrated a major increase in the capability and reliability of the sensor. Building upon these three tests, we expect to further develop and test the operational viability of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor in a series of tests at one or more major airports over the next several years. We have conducted research, development, and testing of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor in conjunction with Lockheed Martin Corporation pursuant to a ten year teaming agreement dated May 1, 1997 under which we are the prime contractor.

     We also are developing a collision avoidance and ground proximity warning system for small aircraft based on our technology referred to as UNICORN (Universal Collision Obviation and Reduced Near-Miss). We recently received a frequency assignment from the Federal Communications Commission for experimental purposes and development of UNICORN and have signed a contract with Georgia Tech Applied Research Corporation, or GTARC under which GTARC has commenced work on the construction of our UNICORN antenna elements. We plan to integrate the antenna with electronics, displays, and processing elements into a collision alerting and ground proximity warning system aimed at the general aviation market. We also have begun exploring the application of this technology to unmanned air vehicles and other specialized commercial and government flight operations.

     Since our inception, our primary source of funding has been three successive contracts with the federal government aggregating approximately $13 million for research, development and testing of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor. We have not had any revenues from commercial sales of either SOCRATES or UNICORN, and we do not expect such sales for several years. We have incurred cumulative losses of $2,460,023 as of May 31, 2003 which we have funded with the proceeds of two private equity offerings. We may need to raise additional capital to complete our future research and development. We may consider and execute from time to time strategic investments, acquisitions or other transactions that we believe will benefit us and complement our current operations, technologies, and resources.

     We are a Nevada corporation that was incorporated in May 2001. In September 2002, we consummated a share exchange with the stockholders of Flight Safety Technologies, Inc., or FSTO, a Delaware corporation which had commenced operations in 1997. FSTO owned patents on and was developing our SOCRATES and UNICORN technologies. As a result of the share exchange, FSTO became our subsidiary and stockholders of FSTO acquired approximately 53% of our outstanding common stock. In June 2003, FSTO merged into us, and we now own the patents on and are continuing the development of our SOCRATES and UNICORN technologies.

General

     Based on testing to date, we believe our SOCRATES technology will provide sensor information for a ground-based wake vortex advisory system, or WVAS, to detect dangerous air turbulence that:

     *   Is designed to operate in all weather conditions;
     *   Is accurate, and can detect even weak disturbances;
     *   Provides early warnings to pilots and air traffic controllers of hazards they may encounter;
     *   Does not require the presence of large atmospheric particles such as rain or ice crystals to
            detect disturbances; and
     *   Is cost-effective and easy to implement.

     SOCRATES uses proprietary opto-acoustic technology to detect, locate and track forms of air turbulence, including clear air turbulence. While our present focus is on air turbulence created by aircraft wakes, we believe that with future research and development our SOCRATES technology may also enable the detection of certain natural atmospheric phenomena, such as windshear and microbursts.

     Air turbulence creates patterns of low-frequency sound waves something like the ring patterns that form in a body of water after a pebble has been tossed into it or a boat has cut through it. These low-frequency sound waves typically travel for long distances through the atmosphere without impediment. As currently implemented, SOCRATES uses low power lasers to project light beams 50 to 100 meters across the ground in the vicinity of airport approach and departure corridors. Reflector devices direct the beams back to a receiver. SOCRATES measures changes in the speed of the light waves of the laser beams. These changes indicate that the laser has interacted with sound waves emanating from air disturbances. Based on these changes, the technology will enable a WVAS to remotely sense the presence of atmospheric turbulence.

     Unlike radar technologies, we believe SOCRATES will be effective without need for the presence of rain, ice crystals, or other aerosols because SOCRATES uses lasers to detect interaction with sound waves, not with atmospheric particles.

     We believe SOCRATES-based WVAS's will be cost-effective and easy to implement because they typically will not require airports to build large towers, acquire additional land on their peripheries, or engage in potentially lengthy and costly environmental negotiations with residential communities, as is required to install Terminal Doppler Weather Radar, or TDWR, systems. In addition, SOCRATES may offer all-weather capability.

     Alternate technologies for detecting air turbulence phenomena can be unreliable, inaccurate, expensive, difficult to implement, or incapable of providing sufficiently early warnings for pilots to take appropriate action. We believe the products we are developing and intend to develop based on SOCRATES may mitigate many of the shortcomings associated with these types of systems.

SOCRATES Wake Vortex Sensor

     Whenever an airplane is in flight, and especially when flying slowly, as during takeoff, approach, and landing, the wing flaps and wings create wake vortices, which are similar to horizontal tornadoes trailing back from the wing tips. If another plane enters this vortex, even several minutes after the first plane has passed, the pilot's control of the aircraft may be compromised. To address these hazards, the Federal Aviation Administration, or FAA, for decades has set spacing requirements between airplanes as they land and take-off. In 1996, the FAA expanded its requirements for plane separations by introducing a new category for separation behind B-757 aircraft. The increased space between planes has translated into even more time in the air, which causes flight delays and increases in fuel and flight crew costs.

     Our initial focus for SOCRATES is development of a wake vortex sensor to detect, locate and track wake vortex turbulence. The sensor will include a low power laser transmitter and receiver, a reflector and special computer electronics designed to translate changes in laser transmissions into data on the presence and location of wake vortex turbulence. We believe wake vortices will be detected at sufficient range to provide pilots with advanced warning of the nature and location of these potential hazards. We are designing our sensor so that upon successful completion of development and FAA approval, it will be a component in a WVAS to be used by air traffic controllers in establishing safe separation between successive arriving and departing aircraft. NASA and the FAA are planning for the integration of other components of WVAS including advanced weather sensors, prediction software for both the vortex movement and the persistence of existing wind conditions, adaptive spacing procedures and communication links between the sensors and the air traffic control towers.

     We expect our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor will generate information that will assist pilots and air traffic controllers to determine more precisely when it is safe for a plane to land or take off. This may enable the FAA to decrease aircraft spacing, thereby increasing airport capacity, reducing flying time and saving money. Our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor also would increase safety by issuing an alert to controllers in instances where a standard separation may not have given sufficient time for a wake vortex to dissipate or move out of the way. A "proof of principle" test of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor was conducted at JFK International Airport in May 1998. We completed controlled testing of an expanded and improved SOCRATES wake vortex sensor, using a NASA Boeing 757 as the source aircraft at Langley Air Force Base in December 2000.

     In September 2003, we completed a three-week test of an improved SOCRATES wake vortex sensor at Denver International Airport. This experiment was part of a NASA-sponsored wake acoustics test and is part of NASA's continuing efforts to improve aviation safety and capacity. Our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor was set up together with a microphone array provided by the German Aerospace Corp. (D.L.R.). NASA and U.S. DOT (Volpe) used a larger, 252 microphone array together with Continuous Wave and Pulsed Lidar systems and an array of supporting meteorological sensors to study the sound emitted from wake vortices. The principal purpose of this NASA-sponsored test was to acquire adequate field data using carefully calibrated microphone arrays to develop a firm scientific basis for the use of sound in detecting, tracking, and characterizing wake vortices created by arriving aircraft. The operation of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor recorded acoustic emissions generated by wake vortices from over 1,000 aircraft, including Boeing 737 and 757 aircraft, Airbus A319 and A320 aircraft, and even smaller regional jets. The sensor recorded these emissions directly above our sensor at an elevation of

approximately 500 feet above ground level. We performed a preliminary analysis of the results and provided a "quick-look" report to NASA and DOT in October 2003. Based upon our analysis of initial data, this test demonstrated a major increase in the capability and reliability of the sensor. We are under contract with NASA and DOT to provide a more in-depth analysis and detailed report by the end of 2003.

     As a result of our Denver test, we now plan to expand our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor to a minimum of 16 beams and test this expanded sensor in the middle of 2005 or earlier. Our goal in the test of a 16-beam sensor is to detect and track wake vortices at ranges up to 2.5 nautical miles and altitudes up to 1,500 feet above the sensor site. We have performed analysis based on phased array radar and sonar systems which we believe indicate that this goal should be achievable. If this test is successful, we believe that we will be able to produce a prototype of an operational SOCRATES wake vortex sensor in 2006 or 2007. If and when the FAA approves our sensor and proceeds with the implementation of WVAS, we anticipate that the FAA will include our sensor in the installation of WVAS at major U.S. airports. Each of these airports will require a system customized for its particular runway layout and topography. At this time, we do not know if the federal government will provide the funding required to complete our plan, if we will successfully implement the plan and testing or if the government will implement WVAS at all or with the inclusion of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor.

SOCRATES Wake Vortex Sensor Market Opportunity

     The FAA is the federal agency in charge of airport safety and air traffic control. In this role, it acquires, owns and is responsible for operating the equipment that monitors and controls the National Airspace System, including the equipment deployed at airports and in all air traffic control towers. As such, the FAA would be our primary customer for our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor.

     In June 2003, the FAA approved a long-term mission needs statement and related investment plan that contemplates expenditures by FAA and NASA of $206 million during the period running from federal fiscal 2003 through 2010 on wake vortex detection research and development. The FAA investment plan includes deployment of a prototype WVAS and culminates in development of wake turbulence capability at selected airports and integration with controller tools. The mission needs statement may not be approved at all necessary levels of the federal government, and the federal government may not provide the funding required to complete the mission needs statement. This funding must be annually requested by the FAA, authorized and approved by Congress, and approved by the President. There is no assurance as to what amount of contract funding, if any, we will receive in connection with the mission needs statement to complete the research, development, and testing of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor for inclusion in a WVAS. The FAA has assigned an overall moderate to high risk rating to the implementation of this program due to technical unknowns and risks associated with getting controllers and pilots to accept a ground or flight deck based system.

     We believe the FAA's substantial investment in addressing the problems associated with wake vortex turbulence and its issuance of the long-term mission needs statement for wake turbulence indicate its belief that there is a growing need in the aviation industry for technologies to combat the wake vortex problem. There are many other participants and constituencies that could have an interest in the deployment and financing of our sensor as part of a WVAS. For example, the International Federation of Airline Pilots Associations, or IFALPA, which represents over 100,000 pilots worldwide and is recognized as the global voice of pilots on both labor and aviation safety issues, officially supports the development of systems that can safely reduce the current wake vortex-related spacing requirements. Airports, which are typically owned and operated by state and local authorities, also have a natural interest in increasing airport safety and efficiency. Airlines also could benefit from installation of a WVAS, which would include our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor, through increased safety and efficiencies and a reduction in fuel costs attributable to delays.

     Factors contributing to this high level of industry support include:

     *   Airline traffic delays from all causes at busy airports. The Air Transport Association estimated that delays attributable to the air traffic control system cost the industry and its passengers and shippers a record $6.5 billion in 2000. These costly delays could be reduced if landings and take-offs were optimally spaced based on actual vortex behavior.

     *   Resistance to building additional runways to alleviate airport congestion. Airports do not want to bear the expense, which can run in the billions of dollars, and surrounding communities do not want to suffer the adverse environmental and aesthetic effects, of adding runways.

     *   Public pressure on governmental agencies to promote aviation safety. Recent aviation catastrophes and near-disasters, especially those with unexplained or turbulence-related causes, have focused public attention on air safety.

     The target market for our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor will include 100 of the busiest airports worldwide. We initially will focus on U.S. airports with closely spaced parallel runways, such as the San Francisco, Anchorage, Newark, Boston Logan, Philadelphia, St. Louis, and Los Angeles International Airports. To improve safety and reduce delays, many of these airports are planning to adopt Simultaneous Offset Independent Approaches, or SOIA, a new set of landing procedures for parallel runway airports that address the problems of wake vortex turbulence under heavy traffic and inclement weather conditions. We believe that our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor will be instrumental in helping the FAA and airports to achieve approval and implementation of SOIA procedures.

     Based upon installations at 100 airports, we estimate the market size for our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor as part of a WVAS at approximately $1 to $2 billion. Our estimate is based on, among other things: our assumption of successful product development and FAA certification; estimates we performed of the number of airports that would benefit from the implementation of WVAS; the number and configuration of runways; a long-term projection of the cost of manufacturing, installing, and testing our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor; and the cost of our current four-beam SOCRATES wake vortex sensor scaled up to a fully operational 32-beam sensor. We estimate the price of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor to be between $10 to $20 million per airport installation. These projections do not include any revenue from field service which we plan to provide if appropriate arrangements can be made with specific airports and the FAA. These estimates have not been reviewed or validated by any third party. We have not updated and have no plans to update these projections.

     These estimates also assume the availability of funding from the FAA, airports and other sources for purchase and installation of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensors as part of WVAS. While we hope the FAA and U.S. government will support such purchase and installation of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensors, when and if a WVAS becomes operational, we do not have any commitment or assurance from the FAA or other branches of the U.S. government to support us in this regard.

General

     The purpose of our UNICORN technology is to provide a low-cost, combined, collision alerting and ground proximity warning capability for general aviation aircraft, including private, business and smaller regional and commercial aircraft. We are also investigating the application of our UNICORN-based "see and be seen" collision avoidance technology for unmanned air vehicles, or UAVs, including military, other government, and commercial operations.

     Our UNICORN technology uses a unique implementation of existing radar technology in an airborne system to detect and track nearby aircraft and detect the ground below and ahead of the airplane. Fixed element antennas on the top and bottom of the aircraft provide full spherical coverage for threat detection. The 50 elements on each antenna provide directionality in 30 degree beams in the horizontal plane and at 45 degree elevation above and below the horizontal, plus single beam polar coverage. Interpolation of radar returns between beams provides for even more precise directionality. The range of this low-powered radar is designed to be at least four nautical miles, providing alerting times on all threat aircraft equivalent to resolution advisories standards for the Traffic Collision Avoidance System, or TCAS, for commercial airliners. Pilots would be alerted to a potential collision threat by both aural and visual means, and the locations of the threat aircraft would be shown on either an existing or dedicated cockpit display.

     In September 2002, we secured FAA approval for the FCC to issue an Experimental Radio Station License facilitating UNICORN antenna development on either of two frequencies: 5145 MHz in the FAA aviation band and 3650-3700 MHz in the non-aviation band. These frequencies may be used at any of three designated locations in the eastern U.S. until August 2004. Extensions of the approval are available by application.

     In August 2003, we signed a contract with Georgia Tech Applied Research Corporation, or GTARC, under which GTARC has commenced work on the construction of our UNICORN antenna elements. Design trade-off testing of these antenna elements should enable construction and testing of the full antenna in 2004. In 2005, we plan to integrate the antenna with electronics, threat software and displays and perform ground-based demonstrations of full functionality. In 2006, we plan to produce an airborne UNICORN warning system. We plan to perform flight certification testing in 2007. We are also exploring the application of this technology to collision avoidance for unmanned air vehicles and other specialized commercial and government flight operations. Once prototypes have been developed and satisfactorily tested, the FAA certification process is expected to take a protracted period of time before operational use anywhere in the domestic airspace of the U.S. will be approved, if at all. Certification and approval to sell to the foreign general-aviation market is likely to take even longer.

     We acquired the UNICORN technology from Advanced Acoustic Concepts, Inc., or AAC, in January 2000. We have agreed to pay AAC a lump sum payment of $150,000 after we receive revenues from sales of UNICORN products of $1,000,000. In addition, we will pay to AAC a continuing royalty of 3% of all net sales of UNICORN products thereafter.

UNICORN General Aviation Collision Alert and Ground Proximity Warning System

     Our UNICORN product for the general aviation market will consist of three parts: a subdivided radar antenna mounted on the top and underside of the aircraft; computerized electronics; and an audio alert and visual display. The antenna will transmit and receive radar signals to obtain omni-directional coverage within a sphere of safety out to about four nautical miles. Computerized electronics will process reflected radar signals through a decision logic that will calculate estimated ranges and closure rates of other aircraft and/or the ground. An audio alert signal will be triggered when approaching aircraft or proximity to the ground constitutes a threat within defined parameters that are consistent with those currently used by more expensive systems such as TCAS. There also will be a visual display that locates and tracks other aircraft and the surrounding terrain.

UNICORN UAV Collision Avoidance System

     We are also in preliminary discussions with NASA about the possible use of UNICORN technology on Unmanned Air Vehicles, or UAV's, to perform the "see and avoid" function required of the pilot in all manned aircraft. There is increasing interest on the part of civil and military authorities in operating UAVs in parts of the National Airspace System other than military restricted areas. These operations could not take place unless the collision safety issue is addressed. Existing systems like TCAS cannot detect aircraft operating without transponders. Properly developed for this application, UNICORN technology has the potential to meet this emerging need.

     A UNICORN-based UAV collision avoidance system would contain an antenna and computerized electronics that are similar in concept to those used in the general aviation products. However, the audio alert and visual display would be replaced by a computerized interface with the onboard flight control system of the UAV. This interface will override the flight control system to cause the UAV to take evasive maneuvers required to avoid collision with other aircraft and/or ground-based objects such as terrain and obstructions.

     NASA has issued a set of criteria for applicants to enter into a cost-sharing arrangement aimed at development of UAV technology. We are currently working on a response to this invitation, and believe that our technology is well positioned for adaptation to UAVs. We also believe that the frequency assignment that we have received from the FCC through the FAA will provide us with a competitive advantage in this application.

UNICORN Technology Market Opportunity

     Our target market for this product will be individual and corporate owners of smaller, general aviation aircraft, which the FAA estimates numbered over 221,000 in the United States in 2000. Collision warning and ground proximity systems currently available for small aircraft are generally priced at retail between $20,000 and $50,000 and, as a result of their high price, have a very low penetration of the general aviation marketplace. We believe our UNICORN technology will enable us to use a more autonomous design to produce a system with similar and some superior capabilities to those of currently available alternatives at a lower cost. Based on anticipated component and labor costs, we estimate a wholesale price for our UNICORN product of about $10,000 per system.

     We believe that, upon successful completion of research, development, testing of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor and the WVAS, the FAA will approve use of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor and implement the WVAS due to the growing demand for cost-effective ways to improve airport safety and capacity and the advantages of our technology over existing alternatives. Our strategies for selling SOCRATES-based products for use in airports will include:

     *   Closely coordinating with the FAA, which will acquire and deploy WVAS including SOCRATES technology at United States airports;

     *   Assisting airports to apply for the allocation of airport improvement grants to acquire WVAS;

     *   Targeting the 100 busiest airports in the world with a campaign including informational seminars and direct marketing; and

     *   Publicizing the advantages of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor in promoting advanced air safety and airport productivity to members of Congress, aircraft manufacturers, commercial airlines, and air travel trade industry groups.

     We believe that, upon completion of research, development, testing and FAA certification, our UNICORN technology will be able to penetrate the aviation industry due to the growing demand for relatively inexpensive collision warning and ground proximity systems and the advantages of our technology over existing alternatives. Our strategies for selling UNICORN-based products to the general aviation markets will include:

     *   Forming relationships with established distributor networks for general aviation avionics to address the retrofit market; and

     *   Building a market for the installation of UNICORN-based products in new general aviation planes by forming alliances with small plane manufacturers such as Cessna, Gulfstream, Raytheon and Piper.

     We believe that upon completion of research, development and testing of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor, SOCRATES technology may be extended to enable the detection, location, and tracking of potentially deadly air turbulence phenomena other than wake vortex turbulence, which include:

     *   Windshear. Thunderstorms and other highly unstable atmospheric events can cause windshear, a sudden, rapid change in wind velocity or direction. The most dangerous form of windshear is a microburst, which occurs when the cold air high in cumulus clouds or thunderstorms falls rapidly to the ground and fans out in all directions. A plane approaching a microburst experiences increasing headwinds and a turbulent altered flight path, and, as it flies further into the microburst, it may experience increasing tailwinds and loss of lift.

     *   Clear-Air Turbulence. One of the most common aviation hazards and sometimes the most damaging is clear-air turbulence, or CAT, which can occur even when no rain or other adverse weather conditions are present. One form of CAT occurs near the ground when a windstorm passes down a steep, rough mountainside forming a layer of air that often turns suddenly upwards and begins to rotate in circles. As these "rotors" multiply they form a series of more violent, spinning air masses, and the waves above them can rise up to altitudes of 30,000 feet or more, about the normal cruising height for most airliners.

     Products addressing these atmospheric hazards may include:

     *   Airport Area Weather Hazard Surveillance System. This product would expand SOCRATES technology to enable the detection, location and tracking of other types of weather hazards such as clear air turbulence, windshear and microbursts, in addition to airplane wake vortices. We will need to perform significant additional research, development and testing of our SOCRATES technology to expand it to an all-weather hazard area surveillance system.

     *   Airborne En-Route Turbulence Warning System. This product would use our SOCRATES technology in an aircraft-based system for detecting dangerous air turbulence throughout a flight. To develop this system, we will need to study ways to use naturally occurring airborne particles that are present regardless of weather conditions, as reflectors for the lasers used in our SOCRATES technology. We also intend to develop models and computer software to interpret return signals, as well as pilot-friendly cockpit display and alerting systems. This system will require substantial additional R&D and testing to determine its commercial viability, which we estimate will cost in the range of $50 million. We therefore view it as a long-term development project and expect to focus primarily on our other products in the near future.

     We have not yet initiated the requisite research and development on these concepts to date. These concepts will require substantial time and effort prior to practical application or commercialization and, at present, are not our primary focus.

     The aviation and airport safety business is very competitive. We expect competition in hazardous weather applications to intensify as air travel and airport congestion continue to increase worldwide, and as public scrutiny of aviation safety heightens. Although we are not aware of any other company or organization developing technologies such as ours, it is possible that others could develop or improve their systems to achieve similar results.

We may face competition from established companies in the aviation systems marketplace, which are currently providing or developing technologies and products such as Low Level Windshear Alert Systems, airborne and ground-based Doppler Radar, Lidar, Laser Doppler Velocimetry, Terminal Doppler Weather Radar, and the Minix winglet. These companies include Allied Signal/Honeywell, Coherent Technologies, Northrop Equipment Corp., Raytheon Corp., Christian Hugues and others. The chart below describes these alternative ground-based technologies.

     We believe our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor will offer many advantages over the products and technologies provided by these competitors, although further research, development, and testing are needed to complete this sensor and make it operational. We believe that once our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor is fully developed and operational, these advantages will position us to penetrate the market, particularly for a ground-based wake vortex sensor. We believe the advantages of a wake vortex sensor based on our SOCRATES technology will include:

     *   Greater reliability in foggy or cloudy weather conditions that often impede lidar-based
               systems;
     *   Superior accuracy, even for small disturbances other systems often miss;
     *   Earlier warning of potential hazards;
     *   No need for large atmospheric particles to detect disturbances; and
     *   Greater cost-effectiveness and easier implementation.

     We believe our UNICORN-based products will offer important advantages over currently available alternatives. We anticipate a system based on this technology would utilize a unique arrangement of radar antennae to provide pilots with visual and aural warnings of approaching aircraft at a much lower cost than alternative systems. The UNICORN technology involves aviation aircraft transmitting a radar signal that creates a minimum "sphere-of-safety" around the aircraft and selectively receives and determines the direction of any radar echo from potential threat aircraft entering that coverage area or territory. This differs from the current FAA Traffic Collision Avoidance System, or TCAS, that utilizes a radar transponder interrogator located on the commercial aircraft it is intended to protect. Theoretically, for TCAS to be truly effective, every potential large or small threat aircraft would be required to carry a radar beacon transponder to respond to the commercial aircraft's interrogation. UNICORN technology is designed so that once adequately alerted, the smaller aircraft would be better able to maneuver "out of harm's way" than a larger, commercial aircraft.

     Our ability to compete successfully in the market for air safety products will depend on our success in:

     *   Completing on a timely basis the research and development, prototyping, testing, and production of our
               SOCRATES and UNICORN-based products;

     *   Obtaining FAA approval of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor and UNICORN products;

     *   Marketing and selling our products to airports, the FAA, airlines and manufacturers and owners of general
               aviation aircraft;

     *   Promoting awareness and acceptance of our products among members of Congress and other government
               officials, aircraft manufacturers, commercial airlines, and air travel industry trade groups; and

     *   Developing and/or acquiring additional technologies and products to meet the changing needs of the aviation
               industry.

     Many of our potential competitors have longer operating histories, greater name and brand recognition and substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, management, service, support, and other resources than we do. Therefore, they may be able to respond more quickly than we can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or customer requirements. We may not be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors, and the competitive pressures may materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

     Substantially all of our time and expenditures have been spent on the research, development and testing of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor. A substantial portion of our funding for R&D contracts of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor has and is expected to continue to come from appropriations of the federal government. These appropriations, from which we have been allocated an aggregate of approximately $13 million in contract funding to date, have been earmarked by Congress for the procuring federal agencies, FAA and NASA, which are responsible for funding, monitoring and administering the development of technology to enhance airport and airline safety.

     In February 2003, the President signed into law as part of the Fiscal Year 2003 Omnibus Appropriation Bill, a $4.5 million addition to the NASA budget for our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor. From these funds, we have received a contract for approximately $3.975 million for continued research, development, and testing of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor as part of a NASA/FAA development of a wake vortex advisory system for use at major airports. This contract funds an expansion of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor from four beams to at least eight beams.

     Proposed federal legislation entitled "Flight 100 - Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act" has been released by a Senate/House conference committee. The original House language specified up to $20 million per year which could be used by the FAA in US Fiscal 2004-2007 to demonstrate and document the operational benefits of a wake vortex advisory system, sometimes referred to as "WVAS". The conference committee language does not include a specific funding amount but continues the authorization with the following language: "such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal years 2004 through 2007 may be used for the development and analysis of wake vortex advisory systems." We are aiming to complete development of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor for inclusion in any such system which NASA is currently developing. The government must successfully test and accept WVAS and our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor for integration into any such system. The proposed legislation must now be approved by both the Senate and House and signed by the President before it becomes enacted into law. Also, funds can only be made available for each year by appropriation legislation and pursuant to contract and work orders between us and the procuring federal agency.

     Upon successful completion of research and development of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor, we will also depend upon the FAA for procurement and installation of WVAS including our sensor in U.S. airports. In June 2003, the FAA approved a long-term mission needs statement that contemplates expenditures by FAA and NASA of $206 million during the period running from federal fiscal 2003 through 2010 on wake vortex detection research and development, including deployment of a prototype WVAS and culminating in development of wake turbulence capability at selected airports and integration with controller tools. The mission needs statement may not be approved at all necessary levels of the federal government, and the federal government may not provide the funding required to complete the mission needs statement, which must be annually requested by the FAA, authorized and approved by Congress, and approved by the President. There is no assurance as to what amount of contract funding, if any, we will receive in connection with the mission needs statement. The FAA has assigned an overall moderate to high risk rating to this program due to technical unknowns and risks associated with getting controllers and pilots to accept a ground or flight deck, or both, based system.

     The federal government may hold, reduce or eliminate future funding for R&D of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensor or WVAS as a result of a reduction in support or opposition from supervising agencies, changes in budgetary priorities or decisions to fund competing systems or components of systems. If this occurs, it will reduce our resources available for R&D of our proprietary technologies, new products or enhancements to our SOCRATES or UNICORN technologies and to market our products. Reduction of funding from the federal government could delay achievement of or increases in profitability, create a substantial strain on our liquidity, resources, and product development, and have a material adverse effect on the progress of our R&D and our financial condition.

     We intend to rely on a combination of patent protection, trademark protection, trade secret protection, copyright protection, and confidentiality agreements to protect our intellectual property rights. We have received a United States patent relating to our SOCRATES technology (US 6,034,760 A issued on March 7, 2000). We have pending patent applications abroad relating to our SOCRATES technology. However, there can be no assurance any patent will issue from these pending applications. We also may apply to federally register various copyrights in our software and documentation with the United States Copyright Office and abroad.

     Our SOCRATES technology patent, includes two fundamental claims: a method claim and an apparatus claim. The method claim covers a laser device that produces an optical beam, directs that beam into the atmosphere and measures the effect of sound waves on the beam as an indicator of hazardous weather conditions that have produced those sound waves in the atmosphere. The apparatus claim covers the apparatus for performing the method claim. Both of these claims cover systems that are mounted either directly on the front of an aircraft or on the ground adjacent to a runway. We have filed corresponding patent applications, based upon the United States application, for a patent on our SOCRATES technology in Canada, Japan, China, Israel, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, and throughout the United Kingdom and Europe. Our contract with the federal government expressly preserves our exclusive rights to our SOCRATES technology.

     We also have received a United States patent relating to our UNICORN technology (US 6,211,808 B1 issued on April 3, 2001). We have filed corresponding patent applications, based upon the United States application, for a patent on our UNICORN technology in Canada, Japan, Australia, New Zealand and countries throughout the United Kingdom and Europe. However, there can be no assurance any patent will issue from these pending applications. We also may apply to federally register various copyrights in our software and documentation with the United States Copyright Office and abroad.

     Our UNICORN technology patent includes claims which cover a collision avoidance system for use in a configuration comprising an antenna built around a dielectric substrate formed into at least part of a sphere and subdivided into a plurality of sectors each having all but their microwave transmitting/receiving face infused with a conducting material forming the wave-guiding surfaces of a microwave horn. Then, a plurality of such microwave horns is re-assembled into a spherical or flattened (oblate) spherical microwave antenna that may be subdivided into hemispherical equivalents for installation as two radar sub-apertures respectively mounted on top and below an aircraft for providing collision, ground-proximity and terrain avoidance warnings to its pilot. A plurality of such microwave horns is combined through a corresponding plurality of microwave transmitter/receiver switches in order to transmit omni-directional radar pulses to create a "sphere-of-safety" around an aircraft. It selectively uses each microwave horn as a way to determine the direction of any received radar echo from another close-by aircraft or the ground below or terrain ahead that poses a potential threat within that coverage. This system non-inclusively embraces the microwave antenna, its switches, local oscillator and mixing diodes, and electronic equipment that provides a "sing-around" logic controlling the transmit/receive cycling to enable the measurement of radial range and range rate. The quotient of these measurements is called "tau", and is used to estimate the degree-of-danger posed by a potential threat based upon its time to the closest-point-of-approach. Controlling the multiplexing of these functions permits detection of several almost simultaneous potential threat encounters. The claims cover any UNICORN-based system whose antenna may be fabricated in an equivalent way and subdivided for low drag-profile mounting above and below the fuselage of an aircraft.

     The airport and airline industry is subject to extensive government oversight and regulation. To introduce a product for commercial sale, we must successfully complete research, development, and testing of the product and obtain necessary governmental approvals for installation of our SOCRATES wake vortex sensors in airports or installation of UNICORN technology in small aircraft. For our SOCRATES wake vortex sensors, the FAA must commission WVAS for use in the National Airspace System. As UNICORN technology is an airborne system, it must be FAA certified for use on aircraft. Any factor that delays or adversely affects this process, including delays in development or difficulty in obtaining federal government approval of the product, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

     Additionally, as a result of receiving funding from the federal government, our business and operations are subject to numerous government laws and regulations. In the near term, and for so long as we receive funding from the federal government, we will be subject to many procurement and accounting rules and regulations of the federal government. We are also subject to periodic audits by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. To date, we have incurred four audits and reports have been issued to our government customer which have stated that we are performing in full accordance with Federal Acquisitions Regulations.

     As of August 31, 2003, we had five full-time and three part-time employees.

     We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding.

     Our primary office, located in Mystic, Connecticut, is leased on a yearly basis at an annual rate of $18,600 until March 31, 2004. We believe that our facilities are adequate to satisfy our projected requirements and that additional space will be available if needed.

     The following table presents information about each of our executive officers and directors as of the date of this prospectus:

     Kenneth S. Wood was appointed to our board of directors on July 14, 2003; Joseph J. Luca was appointed to our board of directors on October 25, 2002; former Senator Larry L. Pressler was appointed to our board of directors on December 4, 2002; and David D. Cryer was appointed to his position as Chief Financial Officer on October 3, 2002 and as Secretary and Treasurer on June 10, 2003. Other current directors and executive officers were first appointed to their positions effective September 1, 2002.

     Samuel A. Kovnat serves as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. From 1995 to 2001, Mr. Kovnat was also a consultant and program development manager for the parametric Airborne Dipping Sonar at the Sonetech Corporation and the Kildare Corporation. During that same period, Mr. Kovnat was a venture partner of Allied Venture Associates whose primary focus was in the Internet security and biotechnology arenas. From 1982 through 1988, Mr. Kovnat was a principle in Tower Capital Corp., an asset management firm based in New York, New York. In 1987, Tower Capital Corp. and its principals, including Mr. Kovnat, were sued by a client and the United

States Department of Labor for certain alleged civil violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or ERISA. Mr. Kovnat settled this suit for $25,000. As a part of the settlement, Mr. Kovnat was enjoined from acting as a manager of ERISA funds in the future. Mr. Kovnat graduated from the University of Miami with a B.S. degree in both Mathematics and Physics. Mr. Kovnat serves on our Compliance, Disclosure and Ethics Oversight Committee and Executive Committee.

     Captain William B. Cotton serves as our President and as a Director. Captain Cotton was a United Airlines pilot from 1967-2000, and from 1986-2000 he was Manager of Air Traffic and Flight Systems at United Airlines. During his tenure as Manager of Air Traffic and Flight Systems, he led United Airlines' efforts to improve air traffic control industry-wide, as well as initiatives to upgrade the company's aircraft for safety and efficiency. From 1997-2000, Captain Cotton also served as Chairman of the Board of ATN Systems, Inc., a consortium of airlines developing aeronautical telecommunications network (ATN) products in cooperation with the Federal Aviation Administration. ATN is a worldwide data network intended to support data communication connectivity between mobile platforms, airlines, providers of aeronautical communications services and government providers of air traffic control and flight information services. Captain Cotton received a B.A. degree and an M.A. degree in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from the University of Illinois and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, respectively. Captain Cotton serves on our Compliance, Disclosure and Ethics Oversight Committee and Executive Committee.

     Frank L. Rees serves as Executive Vice President and as a Director. Mr. Rees is the inventor of our SOCRATES and UNICORN technologies. Mr. Rees holds an M.A. in Mathematics from the University of Maryland, an M.A. in Electronic Engineering from Borough Polytechnic in London, England, as well as a British equivalent of a B.S.E.E summa cum laude in Electronic and Electrical Engineering from South East Essex Technical College in Essex, England. Mr. Rees serves on our Compliance, Disclosure and Ethics Oversight Committee and Executive Committee.

     Jackson Kemper, Jr. is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Kemper Group, Inc., a government relations organization, located in Washington D.C., where he has worked since 1995. Mr. Kemper graduated from Drexel University with a B.S. degree in Engineering.

     Stephen P. Tocco is the President and CEO of ML Strategies, LLC, a business consulting and government relations group headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts, and currently serves as a Chairman of the Massachusetts Board of Higher Education. From August 1993 to January 1997, Mr. Tocco served as executive director and CEO of the Massachusetts Port Authority, which includes Boston's Logan International Airport. Mr. Tocco earned a B.S. degree in Chemistry from the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy. Mr. Tocco serves on our Compliance, Disclosure and Ethics Oversight Committee.

     Joseph J. Luca is the owner of Joseph J. Luca, CPA's, a regional public accounting firm. From 1993 to 1999, Mr. Luca served as the CFO and Director of Administration and Finance of The Massachusetts Port Authority. Mr. Luca is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Luca earned a B.S.B.A. degree from Northeastern University and a Masters of Science in Taxation from Bentley College. Mr. Luca serves as chair of our Finance and Audit Committee and is a member of our Compensation Committee and Compliance, Disclosure and Ethics Oversight Committee.

     Former United States Senator Larry L. Pressler was a member of Congress for 22 years, 18 of which he served in the U.S. Senate (1979-1997). During that time, he authored the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and was Chairman of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee as well as Chairman of the Aviation Subcommittee for that committee. Since 1997, former Senator Pressler has been and is currently Chairman of The Pressler Group, L.L.C., a business consulting and government relations group headquartered in Washington, D.C.

Currently, former Senator Pressler serves on the Boards of Infosys Technologies Ltd., and the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Board of Governors. Former Senator Pressler was a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford, England, received a Masters in Public Administration from Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, and is a graduate of Harvard Law School. Former Senator Pressler serves as the chair of our Compliance, Disclosure and Ethics Oversight Committee.

     Kenneth S. Wood was the President of Barringer Technologies, Inc., a trace detection company, from 1996 to 2002. Mr. Wood graduated from Colgate University with a B.A. degree in Economics and received his J.D. degree from Seton Hall University. Mr. Wood serves on our Finance and Audit Committee and is chair of our Compensation Committee.

     David D. Cryer serves as our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer. Mr. Cryer also serves as Chief Financial Officer of Integrated Medical Services, Inc., a Wyoming corporation, and serves as the Controller to Kildare Corporation, a Delaware corporation. Mr. Cryer graduated from the University of Massachusetts with a B.S. degree in Accounting. He received a Masters Degree in Management Science at Ball State University. Mr. Cryer serves on our Compliance, Disclosure and Ethics Oversight Committee and Executive Committee. Upon completion of this offering, we anticipate that Mr. Cryer will devote substantially all of his professional time and attention to his duties as our Chief Financial Officer.

     Pursuant to our bylaws, our board of directors shall consist of at least one and not more than fifteen directors, with the exact number to be fixed from time to time by our board of directors. Our board of directors currently has eight members. Each director holds office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until the director's successor is elected and qualified.

     Finance and Audit Committee

     The finance and audit committee consists of Joseph J. Luca and Kenneth S. Wood, who is chairman. The functions of the finance and audit committee include retaining our independent auditors, reviewing their independence, reviewing and approving the planned scope of our annual audit, reviewing and approving any fee arrangements with our auditors, overseeing their audit work, reviewing and pre-approving any non-audit services that may be performed by them, reviewing the adequacy of accounting and financial controls, reviewing our critical accounting policies and reviewing and approving any related party transactions.

     Compensation Committee

     The members of the compensation committee are Joseph J. Luca and Kenneth S. Wood, who is chairman. The compensation committee makes recommendations to the board of directors on compensation for our executive officers and other key employees, and reviews management's recommendations for stock option grants and other compensation plans or practices.

     The compliance, disclosure and ethics oversight committee consists of Joseph J. Luca, Stephen P. Tocco and former Senator Larry L. Pressler, who is its chairman, plus our executive officers, Samuel A. Kovnat, Captain William B. Cotton, Frank L. Rees, and David D. Cryer. The general functions of the committee include setting, implementing and monitoring policies to ensure that we comply to the fullest extent possible with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations and ethical standards; adopting a code of ethics; reviewing, controlling and ensuring that we release news, information and materials which are truthful, accurate and complete in all material respects and which comply with Regulation FD; and establishing, overseeing and implementing disclosure, control and review procedures used to prepare SEC filings.

     The members of our executive committee are Samuel A. Kovnat, Captain William B. Cotton, Frank L. Rees, and David D. Cryer. The chief executive officer, Mr. Kovnat, is its chairman. The purpose of the executive committee is to exercise the powers of our board of directors in the management of our operations when our board is unable to act except the executive committee shall not have the power to fill vacancies in our board of directors or the power to amend our bylaws or take any other action without prior approval of our board of directors if the board has required such approval with respect to a particular action or which directly contravenes a prior resolution of our board of directors.

     Our amended articles of incorporation and bylaws provide that our directors and officers will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages due to the breach of a fiduciary duty as a director or officer. Nevada Revised Statute 78.7502 provides that we may indemnify any officer, director, employee or agent who is party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, provided he was acting in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, our best interests, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, he had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful. The indemnification includes all actual and reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement or conviction, does not of itself prevent indemnification so long as the officer or director acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, our best interests, or, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, he had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.

     In addition, Nevada Revised Statute 78.7502 provides that we may indemnify any officer, director, employee or agent who is party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit brought by us or by our stockholders on our behalf, provided he was acting in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, our best interests. The indemnification includes all actual and reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts. However, indemnification is prohibited as to any suit brought in our right in which the director or officer is adjudged by a court to be liable to us.

     To the extent that the officer or director is successful on the merits in any proceeding pursuant to which such person is to be indemnified, we must indemnify him against all actual and reasonable expenses incurred, including attorney's fees.

     The foregoing indemnity provisions will limit your ability as stockholders to hold officers and directors liable and collect monetary damages for breaches of fiduciary duty, and require us to indemnify officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by law.

     To the extent that indemnification may be available to our directors and officers for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, we have been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy and therefore unenforceable.

     The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our chief executive officer and our other most highly compensated executive officers whose salary plus bonus in the last fiscal year exceeded $100,000, for all services rendered in all capacities to us, during the fiscal years ended May 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003.

     Only directors who are not employees of ours, currently Messrs. Kemper, Tocco, Luca, Pressler, and Wood, are compensated for their services as directors. Each non-employee director is paid $1,000 for each meeting of the board of directors that he attends in person. Non-employee directors who sit on the Finance and Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Compliance, Disclosure and Ethics Oversight Committee are compensated at the rate of $300 to $400 per hour for the work on such committee. Directors are also reimbursed for their expenses incurred in attending board of directors and committee meetings.

     Each independent member of the board of directors is also eligible for a grant of stock options under the following terms. Upon initial election to the board of directors, we granted each an option to purchase 125,000 shares of our common stock at $2.00 per share. Of these options, 25% vest immediately, with the remaining options vesting at a rate of 6 1/4% every quarter over a three-year period. All options have a three-year term beginning upon the later of September 1, 2002 or the date of vesting.

     On November 3, 2000, we entered into a three-year employment agreement with William B. Cotton, our President. The agreement provided for the payment to Mr. Cotton of an initial annual salary of $150,000 subject to continuous government funding. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Cotton was also granted an option to purchase 312,500 shares of our common stock.

     On November 3, 2000, we entered into a three-year employment agreement with David D. Cryer, our Chief Financial Officer. The agreement provided for the payment to Mr. Cryer of an initial annual salary of $90,000 subject to continuous government funding.

     On November 3, 2000, we entered into a three-year employment agreement with Samuel A. Kovnat, our Chief Executive Officer. The agreement provided for the payment to Mr. Kovnat of an initial annual salary of $166,000 subject to continuous government funding.

     On November 3, 2000, we entered into a three-year employment agreement with Frank L. Rees, our Executive Vice President. The agreement provided for the payment to Mr. Rees of an initial annual salary of $146,000 subject to continuous government funding.

     These agreements also provide that the parties may agree by written amendment to continue the agreement on a year-to-year basis. We anticipate that we will renew these contracts.

     We recently approved the continuation of a consulting contract in the amount of $6,000 per month plus expenses between us and The Kemper Co. L.L.C. which is owned by one of our directors, Jackson Kemper, Jr.

     The following table sets forth, as of August 14, 2003, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (i) each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of our common stock, (ii) each director, (iii) each executive officer, and (iv) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. Except as set forth below, we are not aware of any beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of our common stock. Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners of our common stock listed below, based on information furnished by such owners, have sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares, subject to community property laws where applicable.

*Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent of the issued and outstanding common stock on August 14, 2003.

(1)  Unless otherwise indicated, all addresses are c/o Flight Safety Technologies, Inc., 28 Cottrell Street, Mystic, Connecticut, 06355.

(2)  Beneficial ownership as reported in the above table has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The number of shares beneficially owned by each person or group as of August 14, 2003 includes shares of Common Stock that such person or group had the right to acquire on or within 60 days after August 14, 2003, including, but not limited to, upon the exercise of options.

(3)  For each person and group included in the table, percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person or group as described above by the sum of the 15,901,233 shares of Common Stock outstanding on August 14, 2003 and the number of shares of Common Stock that such person or group had the right to acquire on or within 60 days of August 14, 2003, including, but not limited to, upon the exercise of options.

(4)  Includes 409,063 shares of our common stock issuable to Mr. Cotton upon the exercise of options at a rate of $2.00 per option. Options for an additional 28,437 shares will vest on December 15, 2003.

(5)  Represents 125,000 shares of our common stock, plus an additional 125,000 shares of our common stock issuable to Mr. Kemper upon the exercise of options at a rate of $2.00 per option.

(6)  Solely represents shares of our common stock issuable to Mr. Tocco upon the exercise of options at a rate of $2.00 per option. Options for an additional 7,815 shares of our common stock will vest on December 15, 2003.

(7)  Solely represents shares of our common stock issuable to Mr. Luca upon the exercise of options at a rate of $2.00 per option. Options for an additional 70,371 shares of our common stock will vest over the next 24 months at a rate of 7,812 shares per quarter.

(8)  Solely represents shares of our common stock issuable to former Senator Pressler upon the exercise of options at a rate of $2.00 per option.

(9)  Solely represents shares of our common stock issuable to Mr. Wood upon the exercise of options at a rate of $2.00 per option. Options for an additional 93,750 shares of our common stock will vest over the next 36 months at a rate of 7,812 shares per quarter.

(10)  Includes 862,127 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of options. See notes 4 through 9.

(11)  Includes 1,250,000 shares of our common stock held by Spencer Trask Intellectual Capital Company, LLC; 22,725 shares of our common stock held by Spencer Trask Ventures, Inc.; and 105,545 shares of our common stock issuable to Spencer Trask & Co. upon exercise of issued and outstanding warrants at a rate of $2.00 per warrant; 113,632 shares of our common stock held by William Dioguirdi, President of Spencer Trask, LLC and 38,385 shares of our common stock issuable to William Dioguirdi, President of Spencer Trask, LLC upon exercise of warrants at a rate of $2.00 per warrant. The address for Spencer Trask Intellectual Capital Company, LLC is 535 Madison Avenue, 18^th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

     Upon completion of this offering, our authorized capital stock will consist of 50,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to our articles of incorporation and bylaws, copies of which are filed as exhibits to our previous filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference.

     In the offering described in this prospectus, we are offering for sale units of our securities. Each unit consists of two shares of common stock and one public warrant to purchase one additional share of common stock. The public warrants will trade only as a part of a unit for at least 30 days following this offering unless the representative of the underwriters determines that separate trading of the warrants should occur earlier.

     We have authorized 50,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock, and 15,901,233 shares were issued and outstanding as of August 31, 2003. Holders of shares of our common stock are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by the Board of Directors from funds legally available therefore, and, upon liquidation, are entitled to share pro rata in any distribution to stockholders. The holders of shares of our common stock have one vote per share and have no preemptive rights. Our common stock is not redeemable, does not have conversion rights and is not liable to assessment or further calls by us. Our Articles of Incorporation, as amended, do not grant the stockholders cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. Certain provisions of the articles and bylaws, certain sections of the Nevada General Corporation Law, and the ability of our board of directors to issue shares of preferred stock and to establish the voting rights, preferences and other terms thereof, may be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect and may discourage takeover attempts not first approved by our board of directors, including takeovers which stockholders may deem to be in their best interests.

     Our articles of incorporation provide for the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value. Our board of directors will have the authority, without further action by the stockholders, to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to designate the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of each such series. The issuance of preferred stock could have the effect of restricting dividends on the common stock, diluting the voting power of the common stock, impairing the liquidation rights of the common stock or delaying or preventing a change in control without further action by the stockholders. At present, we have no plans to issue any shares of preferred stock after completion of this offering.

     As of August 31, 2003, there were outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 1,898,850 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share, 1,698,477 of these options are vested, 36,252 will vest on December 15, 2003, 70,371 will vest over the next 24 months, and 93,750 will vest over the next 36 months.

     As of August 31, 2003, there were outstanding warrants to purchase an aggregate of 303,173 shares of our common stock, exercisable at $2.00 per share.

     Each public warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of our common stock at an exercise price per share of $___. The exercise price is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events as provided in the public warrant certificate and summarized below. Our public warrants may be exercised at any time after this offering until the fifth anniversary date of this offering, which is the expiration date. Those of our public warrants which have not previously been exercised will expire on the expiration date. A public warrant holder will not be deemed to be a holder of the underlying common stock for any purpose until the public warrant has been properly exercised.

     Our common stock and public warrants sold in this offering will initially be represented by certificates representing units, and we will not replace these certificates with certificates representing the component securities of the units for a period of 30 days following this offering unless the representative of the underwriters agrees to

permit earlier separation. During such 30-day period, or such shorter period as the representative of the underwriters may permit, the public warrants will not trade separately. We will announce in advance the commencement of trading in the public warrants by a press release. We will continue to list the units on the American Stock Exchange for up to 30 days following this offering but may cease to maintain the listing of the units at any time thereafter. Upon separation, unit holders who wish to hold physical certificates will, upon surrender of their unit certificates, receive certificates for the common stock and public warrants represented by such unit certificates.

     We have the right to redeem the public warrants issued in this offering at a redemption price of $0.25 per warrant, subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split, stock dividend or the like, after providing 30 days prior written notice to the public warrant holders at any time after the last reported sales price of our common stock equals or exceeds $_____, for five consecutive trading days. We will send the written notice of redemption by first class mail to public warrant holders at their last known addresses appearing on the registration records maintained by the transfer agent for our public warrants. No other form of notice by publication or otherwise will be required. If we call the public warrants for redemption, they will be exercisable until the close of business on the business day next preceding the specified redemption date.

     A public warrant holder may exercise our public warrants only if an appropriate registration statement is then in effect with the Securities and Exchange Commission and if the shares of common stock underlying our public warrants are qualified for sale under the securities laws of the state in which the holder resides.

     Our public warrants may be exercised by delivering to our transfer agent the applicable public warrant certificate on or prior to the expiration date or the redemption date, as applicable, with the form on the reverse side of the certificate executed as indicated, accompanied by payment of the full exercise price for the whole number of public warrants being exercised. Public warrants may only be exercised to purchase whole shares. Public warrant holders will receive cash equal to the current market value of any fractional interest, which will be the value of one whole interest multiplied by the fraction thereof, in the place of fractional public warrants that remain after exercise if they would then hold public warrants to purchase less than one whole share. Fractional shares will not be issued upon exercise of our public warrants.

     The exercise price and redemption price are subject to adjustment if we declare any stock dividend to stockholders or effect any split or reverse split with respect to our common stock after the effective date of this offering. Therefore, if we effect any stock split or reverse split with respect to our common stock, the exercise price in effect immediately prior to such stock split or reverse split will be proportionately reduced or increased, respectively. Any adjustment of the exercise price will also result in an adjustment of the number of shares purchasable upon exercise of a public warrant or, if we elect, an adjustment of the number of public warrants outstanding.

     Until exercised, the warrants will have no voting, dividend or other shareholder rights.

     The terms and conditions of the warrants may be modified upon the recommendation of our management in the event of a merger, consolidation, share exchange, or sale of substantially all of our assets that is approved by our stockholders in accordance with our Articles of Incorporation and Nevada law. Such approval generally requires the vote of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock while a quorum is present. The warrants also may be modified upon recommendation of our management and an approving vote by a majority of outstanding warrant holders.

     In July 2003, our board of directors approved a plan to use commercially reasonable efforts to promptly register an aggregate of 639,523 shares of our common stock underlying certain of our outstanding warrants and stock options. Participation in this plan was conditioned upon an agreement by the security holder to shorten the period of exercise to one year from the effective date of registration of the underlying shares with the SEC and to eliminate the so-called "cashless exercise" provision. Holders of warrants and stock options to purchase an aggregate of 377,031 shares of our common stock have elected to participate in this plan. We specifically reserved the right to withdraw or terminate this plan at any time, for any reason in our sole discretion. Management is currently considering what, if any, action to take in implementing this plan.

     The following discussion sets forth the material federal income tax consequences, under current law, relating to the purchase and sale of the units and the underlying common stock and warrants. The discussion is a summary and does not deal with all aspects of federal taxation that may be applicable to an investor, it does not consider specific facts and circumstances that may be relevant to a particular investor's tax position. Some holders, such as dealers in securities, insurance companies, tax exempt organizations, foreign persons and those holding common stock or warrants as part of a straddle or hedge transaction, may be subject to special rules that are not addressed in this discussion. This discussion is based only on current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and on administrative and judicial interpretations as of the date of this prospectus, all of which are subject to change. You should consult your own tax advisor as to the specific tax consequences to you of this offering, including the applicability of federal, slate, local and foreign tax laws.

     Each unit as a whole will have a tax basis equal to the cost of the unit. The measure of income or loss from some of the transactions described below depends on the tax basis in each of the warrant and the share of common stock comprising the unit. We have allocated the purchase price between the warrant and the common stock so that the tax basis for the warrant will be equal to [  ]% of the price of the unit and the tax basis for the common stock will be equal to [  ]% of the price of the unit. If you disagree with the allocation, please see your tax advisor for advice on how to notify the Internal Revenue Service that you disagree with the allocation and claim a different basis.

     No gain or loss will be recognized by a holder of a warrant on the purchase of shares of common stock for cash on an exercise of a warrant, except that gain will be recognized to the extent cash is received in the place of fractional shares or warrants. The tax basis of common stock received upon exercise of a warrant will equal the sum of the tax basis of the exercised warrant and the exercise price. The holding period of the common stock acquired will begin on the date the warrant is exercised. It does not include the period during which the warrant was held.

     Gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of a warrant will be capital gain or loss to its holder if the common stock to which the warrant relates would have been a capital asset in the holder's hands. This capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the holder has held the warrant for more than one year at the time of the sale, disposition or lapse. If we redeem a warrant, the holder generally will realize capital gain or loss. Individuals generally have a maximum federal income tax of 15% on long-term capital gains. The deduction of capital losses is subject to limitations.

     A holder who sells common stock other than in connection with a tax free reorganization of involving us will recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized and the holder's tax basis in the common stock. Generally, the holder's tax basis in the common stock will equal the portion of the unit price that was allocable to the common stock. If the common stock is a capital asset in the holder's hands, gain or loss upon the sale of the common stock will be a long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on whether the common stock has been held for more than one year. Individuals generally have a maximum federal income tax of 15% on long-term capital gains. The deduction of capital losses is subject to limitations.

     If a holder of a warrant allows it to expire or lapse without exercise, the expiration or lapse will be treated as a sale or exchange of the warrant on the expiration date. The holder will have a loss equal to the amount of such holder's tax basis in the lapsed warrant. If the warrant is a capital asset in the hands of the holder, the loss will be a long-term or short-term capital loss, depending on whether the warrant was held for more than one year. The deduction of capital losses is subject to limitations.

     Future sales of substantial amounts of common stock or our other securities in the public market or the prospect of such sales could adversely affect prevailing market prices.

     Upon completion of this offering, ____________ shares of common stock will be outstanding, which includes 15,901,233 shares of common stock outstanding as of August 31, 2003 and the _____________ shares of our common stock comprising a part of the units to be sold pursuant to this prospectus. The shares comprising the units will be freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act of 1933, unless purchased by an "affiliate" of ours, as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Of the remaining 15,901,233 outstanding shares, as of October 4, 2003, 8,242,908 were freely tradable and we estimate 7,658,325 were eligible to be traded under Rule 144 of the Securities Act. Of these 7,658,325 shares, (i) 3,537,874 were held by "affiliates" and subject to the monthly volume limitation under Rule 144; and (ii) 4,120,451 were held by non-affiliated stockholders, subject to the monthly volume limitation, which we estimate will expire for 3,826,325 of these shares on September 1, 2004 and on 294,126 of these shares on June 27, 2005. In addition, the 3,537,874 shares held by "affiliates" will be subject to contractual lock-up agreements with Paulson Investment Company, Inc. pursuant to which such shares may not be sold for a period of 90 days from the effective date of this offering.

     An additional ______________ shares of our common stock may become available for resale upon exercise of the public warrants, the underwriters' over-allotment option and the representative's warrants.

     An additional 1,898,850 shares may become eligible for future sale upon exercise of stock options outstanding as of August 31, 2003; and 303,173 shares may become eligible for future sale upon exercise of warrants outstanding as of August 31, 2003.

     As a result of the foregoing, [___________] of the shares outstanding immediately prior to the offering (or obtainable on exercise of securities outstanding immediately prior to the offering) can be resold in the public market immediately following the offering without restriction or subject to limitations other than the passage of additional time. An additional 3,537,874 shares will be eligible for resale upon expiration of, or release from, the lock-up agreements applicable to them. Many of the holders of these securities have held them for a considerable period of time and may wish to dispose of some or all of their investment. The sale of a substantial number of such shares in the public market, or the possibility of such sales, could have a depressive effect on our stock price.

     The transfer agent for the units and public warrants offered hereby, our common stock and our currently outstanding warrants is Pacific Stock Transfer Company.

     We have applied to list our common stock, units and warrants on the American Stock Exchange under the trading symbols "FLT," "FLT.u" and "FLT.ws," respectively.

     Paulson Investment Company, Inc. is acting as the representative of the underwriters. We and the underwriters named below have entered into an underwriting agreement with respect to the units being offered. In connection with this offering and subject to certain conditions, each of the underwriters named below has severally agreed to purchase, and we have agreed to sell, the number of units set forth opposite the name of each underwriter.

     The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are obligated to purchase all of the units offered by this prospectus, other than those covered by the over-allotment option, if any units are purchased. The underwriting agreement also provides that the obligations of the several underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of the units are subject to the approval of certain legal matters by counsel and certain other conditions. These conditions include, among other things, the requirements that no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the registration statement be in effect and that no proceedings for such purpose have been instituted or threatened by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     The representative has advised us that the underwriters propose to offer our units to the public initially at the offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and to selected dealers at such price less a concession of not more than $__________ per unit. The underwriters and selected dealers may re-allow a concession to other dealers, including the underwriters, of not more than $__________ per unit. After completion of the initial public offering of the units, the offering price, the concessions to selected dealers and the reallowance to their dealers may be changed by the underwriters.

     The underwriters have informed us that they do not expect to confirm sales of our units offered by this prospectus on a discretionary basis.

     Pursuant to the underwriting agreement, we have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for 45 days from the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to an additional __________ units on the same terms as the other units being purchased by the underwriters from us. The underwriters may exercise the option solely to cover over-allotments, if any, in the sale of the units that the underwriters have agreed to purchase. If the over-allotment option is exercised in full, the total public offering price, underwriting discounts and commissions, and proceeds to us before offering expenses will be $____________, $_____________ and $__________________, respectively.

     Until the distribution of the units offered by this prospectus is completed, rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission may limit the ability of the underwriters to bid for and to purchase units or their component securities. As an exception to these rules, the underwriters may engage in transactions that stabilize the price of the units. Paulson Investment Company, Inc., on behalf of the underwriters, may engage in over-allotment sales, stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids in accordance with Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

     Short sales involve the sale by the underwriters of a greater number of shares than they are required to purchase in this offering. Covered short sales are sales made in an amount not greater than the representative's over-allotment option to purchase additional shares in this offering. In determining the source of shares to close out the covered short position, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as compared with the price at which they may purchase shares through the over-allotment option. Naked short sales are sales in excess of the over-allotment option. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in this offering.

     In general, the purchase of a security to stabilize or to reduce a short position could cause the price of the security to be higher than it might be otherwise. These transactions may be effected on the American Stock Exchange or otherwise. Neither we nor the underwriters can predict the direction or magnitude of any effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of the units. In addition, neither we nor the underwriters can represent that the underwriters will engage in these types of transactions or that these types of transactions, once commenced, will not be discontinued without notice.

     The underwriting agreement provides for indemnification between us and the underwriters against specified liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, and for contribution by us and the underwriters to payments that may be required to be made with respect to those liabilities. We have been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, indemnification for liabilities under the Securities Act is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.

     We have agreed to sell the units to the underwriters at the initial offering price of $_____, which represents the initial public offering price of the units set forth on the cover page of this prospectus less the _____% underwriting discount. The underwriting agreement also provides that Paulson Investment Company, Inc. will be paid a nonaccountable expense allowance equal to 2.5% of the gross proceeds from the sale of the units offered by this prospectus, including any units purchased on exercise of the over-allotment option.

     We have also agreed to issue warrants to certain underwriters to purchase from us up to ____ units at an exercise price per unit equal to $_____ per unit (120 percent of the public offering price of a unit). These warrants are exercisable during the four-year period beginning one year from the date of this prospectus. Pursuant to NASD Rule 2710(c)(7)(A), these warrants cannot be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated by any person for a period of one year following the effective date of the offering, except to any NASD member participating in the offering, to our bona fide officers, by operation of law or if we are reorganized, so long as the securities so transferred remain subject to the same transfer restriction for the remainder of the one-year period.

     The holders of the underwriters' warrants will have, in that capacity, no voting, dividend or other stockholder rights. Any profit realized by the representative on the sale of the securities issuable upon exercise of the underwriters' warrants may be deemed to be additional underwriting compensation. The securities underlying the underwriters' warrants are being registered on the registration statement. During the term of the underwriters' warrants, the holders thereof are given the opportunity to profit from a rise in the market price of our common stock. At any time at which the underwriters' warrants are likely to be exercised, we may be able to obtain additional equity capital on more favorable terms. Consequently, we may find it more difficult to raise additional equity capital while the underwriters' warrants are outstanding.

     Our officers and directors have agreed that for a period of 90 days from the date this registration statement becomes effective that they will not sell, contract to sell, grant any option for the sale or otherwise dispose of any of our equity securities, or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for our equity securities, other than through intra-family transfers or transfers to trusts for estate planning purposes, without the consent of Paulson Investment Company, Inc., as the representative of the underwriters, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld. Paulson Investment Company, Inc. may consent to an early release from the 90-day lock-up period if in its opinion the market for the common stock would not be adversely impacted by such sales and in cases of an officer, director or other stockholder's financial emergency. We are unaware of any officer or director who intends to ask for consent to dispose of any of our equity securities during the lock-up period.

     The initial public offering price of the units offered by this prospectus and the exercise price of the public warrants were determined by negotiation between us and the underwriters. Among the factors considered in determining the initial public offering price of the units and the exercise price of the public warrants were:

     *     the market price of the common stock;

     *     our history and our prospects;

     *     the industry in which we operate;

     *     the status and development prospects for our proposed products and services;

     *     our past and present operating results;

     *     the previous experience of our executive officers; and

     *     the general condition of the securities markets at the time of this offering.

     The offering price stated on the cover page of this prospectus should not be considered an indication of the actual value of the units. That price is subject to change as a result of market conditions and other factors, and we cannot assure you that the units, or the common stock and public warrants contained in the units, can be resold at or above the initial public offering price.

     Certain legal matters, including the legality of the issuance of the shares of common stock offered herein, are being passed upon for us by our counsel, Tobin, Carberry, O'Malley, Riley & Selinger, P.C., New London, Connecticut. Certain legal matters with respect to our patents and proprietary rights, as described in this prospectus, are being passed upon for us by our patent counsel, the Law Offices of David A. Tamburro, Deerfield Beach, Florida. Certain matters related to the offer and sale of the units will be passed on for the underwriters by Holland & Knight LLP, Portland, Oregon.

     The financial statements of Flight Safety Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiary, as of May 31, 2003, have been included herein and in the registration statement in reliance upon the report of Kostin, Ruffkess & Company, LLC, independent certified public accountants, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of that firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

     We file reports, registration statements and other documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The registration statement of which this prospectus is a part contains additional relevant information about us and our common stock, and you should refer to the registration statement and its exhibits to read that information. References in this prospectus to any of our contracts or other documents are not necessarily complete, and you should refer to the exhibits attached to the registration statement for copies of the actual contract or document.

     You may read and copy the registration statement, the related exhibits and our other filings with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You also may request copies of those documents at prescribed rates by writing to the SEC. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the Public Reference Room. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The site's address is http://www.sec.gov.

(a)     Audited statements for fiscal years ended May 31, 2003 and 2002.

To The Board of Directors
Flight Safety Technologies, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Flight Safety Technologies, Inc. as of May 31, 2003, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholder's equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended May 31, 2003 and 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of our management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Flight Safety Technologies, Inc. as of May 31, 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended May 31, 2003 and 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Farmington, Connecticut
July 9, 2003

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Significant accounting policies followed by Flight Safety Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") in determining financial position and the results of operations are as follows:

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company and its 96.54% owned subsidiary, Flight Safety Technologies Operating, Inc. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation. On June 27, 2003, Flight Safety Technologies Operating, Inc. was merged into Flight Safety Technologies, Inc.

The Company is engaged in the development of two proprietary sensor technologies: SOCRATES and UNICORN.

SOCRATES (Sensor for Optically Characterizing Ring-eddy Atmospheric Turbulence Emanating Sound) is designed to detect clear air turbulence, microbursts, and aircraft generated vortices which result in hazardous conditions to safe air travel.

UNICORN (Universal Collision Obviation and Reduced Near-Miss) is a technology that is being designed based upon an arrangement of radar which gives both visual and audible warning indication of approaching aircraft to pilots.

On May 29, 1997, the Company was awarded a contract in the amount of $1,326,335, sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"), to commence the development and "Proof-of-Principle" of Socrates. During the period February 22, 1998 through May 31, 1999, the FAA added seven modifications to this contract totaling $1,664,821.

The total contract funding for Phase I of Socrates in fiscal 1997 and 1998 was $2,991,156. An additional $4,927,898 was awarded on August 29, 1999, for Phase II of Socrates and Phase II was further increased to $6,200,000 on February 20, 2003. As of May 31, 2003, nine task orders have been approved totaling $6,041,448 and as of May 31, 2003, the remaining funding for Phase II is $1,127,976.

The Company's Federal contract, with modifications, was issued and is managed by The Volpe Center of the U.S. Department of Transportation. The Company submits, and receives payment on, monthly invoices, which represent progress payments covering the Company's total direct and indirect costs on the project.

The Company's primary office is in Mystic, Connecticut, and it also has offices in Baltimore, Maryland, and Chicago, Illinois. In addition to its full-time employees, the Company is further supported by a team of consultants and subcontractors, including Lockheed Martin Corporation and Anteon Corp., with whom the Company has a long-term Teaming Agreement.

Depreciation of property and equipment is provided using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of five years. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments, which extend the useful lives of property and equipment, are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.

Deferred taxes arise from differences in recording depreciation, amortization, and net operating loss carryforwards for financial statement and tax purposes.

The Company had amounts in excess of $100,000 in a single bank during the year. Amounts over $100,000 are not covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand and short-term investments maturing within ninety days. As a result of the business combination with Reel Staff, Inc. the following non-cash transaction was recorded:

Intangible assets consist of patent costs associated with SOCRATES and UNICORN. Patents are being amortized using the straight-line method over a period of seventeen years.

Company sponsored research and development costs, including proposal costs and un-reimbursed expenditures for developmental activities are charged against income in the year incurred.

The Company recognizes income from contracts under the percentage of completion method of accounting for financial reporting purposes. Revenues are measured by the ratio of the costs incurred to date divided by the estimated total costs for each contract. Contracting costs include all direct material, labor, and subcontracting costs. General and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Revenue related to claims is recorded at the lesser of actual costs incurred or the amount expected to be realized.

Income or (loss) per share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Potential common shares have not been included due to their anti-dilutive effect.

The estimated fair value of financial instruments has been determined based on the available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. The carrying amounts of cash, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate fair value at May 31, 2003, because of the short maturity of these financial instruments.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Concentration of credit risk exists with respect to contract receivables. This risk is mitigated by the fact that these receivables are with the United States Government.

The Company applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25") and related interpretations in accounting for its stock awards, and complies with the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123"). Under APB 25, compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period to the extent that the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of the grant exceeds the exercise price of the employee stock award.

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 96-18, "Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services." All transactions in which services are received for issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date of the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the counterparty's performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

Note 2 - Contract Receivables and Other Receivables:

At May 31, accounts receivable consisted of the following:

Note 3 - Property and Equipment:

Property and equipment are summarized by major classifications as follows:

Depreciation expense for the years ended May 31, 2003 and 2002 was $49,825 and $37,479, respectively

The gross patent costs as of May 31, 2003, were $154,182. Related accumulated amortization was $23,348. Amortization expense for the years ended May 31, 2003 and 2002 was $9,258 and $7,028, respectively. Amortization expense for the next five years is expected to be $9,070 per year.

Note 5 - Stockholders' Equity: