g3238.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
x ANNUAL
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the
fiscal year ended March
31,
2009
|
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from ______________ to________________
Commission
file number 333-152365
INTERPRO
MANAGEMENT CORP
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
|
98-0537233
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
601
Union Street, Two Union Square, 42nd
Floor, Seattle, WA
|
|
98101
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code (206) 652-3770
Securities
registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
|
|
N/A
|
Title
of each class
|
|
Name
of each exchange on which
registered
|
Securities
registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:
1,200,000
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value
(Title of
class)
Indicate
by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate
by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate
by checkmark whether the registrant has (1) filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate
by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller
reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes x No o
State the
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was
last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the
last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal
quarter: $114,000 based on a
price of $0.05 per share.
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS
DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS:
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports
required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a
court. Yes No N/A
(APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date. 2,280,000 shares of common stock as of
June 29,
2009.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
List
hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of
the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is
incorporated: (1) any annual report to security holders; (2) any proxy or
information statement; and (3) any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or
(c) of the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be
clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to
security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980). Not Applicable
Available
Information
Our
Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on
Form 8-K and all amendments to those
reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, are
available at the SEC's public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of
the public reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also
maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information
statements and other information regarding reporting companies.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PART
I
Forward
Looking Statements.
This
annual report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements relate to future
events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can
identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may", "should",
"expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "estimates", "predicts",
"potential" or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable
terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the
section entitled "Risk Factors" and the risks set out below, any of which may
cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of
activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements. These risks include, by way of example
and not in limitation:
·
|
the
uncertainty that we will not be able to successfully identify and evaluate
a suitable business opportunity;
|
·
|
risks
related to the large number of established and well-financed entities that
are actively seeking suitable business
opportunities;
|
·
|
risks
related to the failure to successfully management or achieve growth of a
new business opportunity; and
|
·
|
other
risks and uncertainties related to our business
strategy.
|
This list
is not an exhaustive list of the factors that may affect any of our
forward-looking statements. These and other factors should be
considered carefully and readers should not place undue reliance on our
forward-looking statements.
Forward
looking statements are made based on management’s beliefs, estimates and
opinions on the date the statements are made and we undertake no obligation to
update forward-looking statements if these beliefs, estimates and opinions or
other circumstances should change. Although we believe that the
expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we
cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the
securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the
forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual
results.
Our
financial statements are stated in United States dollars and are prepared in
accordance with United States generally accepted accounting
principles.
In this
annual report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in
United States dollars and all references to "common stock" refer to the common
shares in our capital stock.
As used
in this annual report, the terms "we", "us", "our" and "Interpro" mean Interpro
Management Corp., unless otherwise indicated.
Overview
We are a
development stage company with limited operations and no revenues from our
business operations. Our auditors have issued a going concern
opinion. This means that our auditors believe there is substantial doubt as to
whether we can continue as an ongoing business for the next twelve months. We do
not anticipate that we will generate revenues until we have completed
development and deployment of our web-based software product. Accordingly, we
must raise cash from sources other than our operations in order to implement our
development and marketing plan. In our management’s opinion, there is
a market need for web-based software that is a time and task management
tool.
We
believe that our current funding will allow us to begin our product development,
market our website, and remain in business for twelve months. We hope to begin
to generate revenues in fiscal year 2010. If we are unable to generate revenues
within twelve months of the effectiveness of this Registration Statement for any
reason, or if we are unable to make a reasonable profit within twelve months of
the effectiveness of this Registration Statement, we may have to suspend or
cease operations. At the present time, we have not made any arrangements to
raise additional cash, other than through this offering. If we raise less than
the maximum amount and need additional funds, we may seek to obtain additional
funds through a second public offering, private placement of securities, or
loans. Other than as described in this paragraph, we have no other financing
plans at this time.
We are
developing a software product that we expect will increase managers’ visibility
into employee productivity and projects, thus reducing the need for meetings and
micro-management, and assisting in efficient project
management. We intend for our software product to be easy to
install, with little or no downtime, and to offer functionality that integrates
all aspects of project management. We plan for our software product
to be capable of providing a generic solution for organizations of any size;
although we will initially focus on small and medium-sized
organizations.
The
Market Opportunity
In the
United States, poor project management, including poor time management, costs
companies billions of dollars per year in lost productivity. The
factors that contribute to poor project management include low employee morale,
overbearing managers, poor time management, lost billing hours, and incomplete
expense reporting.
Our
software product was conceived in response to the need to increase productivity
and efficiency within organizations.
We
believe that our software product will enable organizations to improve time,
task, and project management, thus improving overall efficiency and
productivity.
In 2004,
250 first and second-line supervisors participating in management development
seminars were surveyed (www.accel-team.com; Time Management
Study). These managers were asked to identify three things higher
management did that wasted their time.
The
categorized complaints demonstrate that the actions of higher management,
despite positive intentions, were perceived as, or became, obstacles to
accomplishment. The main complaints of first-line and second-line
supervisors from almost 200 organizations were as follows:
·
|
The
boss stops by to socialize, interrupting priority
work.
|
·
|
Everything
that comes up must be done 'right
now.'
|
·
|
Meetings
are called that are unnecessary, are called for which my presence isn't
needed although I am requested to attend, or go off track and take longer
than necessary.
|
·
|
Priorities
are changed in midstream.
|
·
|
The
boss isn't available when really
needed.
|
·
|
The
boss gives assignments to my people without my
knowledge.
|
·
|
My
boss gives me assignments that are someone else’s
responsibility.
|
·
|
Assignments
are unclear; I'm given incomplete instructions, requirements, or
information.
|
·
|
Projects
are given unrealistic timetables.
|
·
|
My
boss insists that I personally handle work assignments that my
subordinates could do without much direction from
me.
|
·
|
My
boss keeps looking over my shoulder to see what I'm
doing.
|
·
|
My
boss wants minute detail on minor matters, ignoring or withholding action
on more important ones.
|
Needless
to say, time management problems and poor work habits can be found at all
levels, although the survey focused on the higher levels of management. There is
no doubt that with awareness, self-discipline, and effective project management
tools, most managers at any level could improve their efficiency, as well as the
efficiency of those who work for them, by up to 20 percent.
Target
Market and Market Size
The
target market for our software product is:
1)
|
Small
and medium sized businesses that provide services to their clients and are
looking for a solution to organize their internal operations and work flow
such as engineering firms, IT firms, law firms and
accountants.
|
2)
|
Software/
IT development firms that develop their own products or provide services
to their clients.
|
3)
|
Small
and medium sized businesses that have their employees working offsite,
where employees can use the proposed system as a collaboration
system.
|
4)
|
Small
and medium sized businesses that provide outsourcing services and require
keeping track of working hours, accounting, and services they provide to
their clients.
|
We will
initially focus our sales in the United States as we know this market and it
represents a significant opportunity in terms of sales potential.
The
market is sophisticated, software savvy, and educated in terms of the need to
increase productivity and time efficiency.
We plan
to develop a product that is generic in that it can be used in any small or
medium-sized business that provides services to clients and that is seeking a
solution to organize its internal operations and work flow.
Potential
Market Size
According
to the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Statistics, in the United States there
are 100,000 engineering firms, 120,000 accounting firms, 100,000 software and IT
development firms, and 70,000 law firms. A one percent market share
of these target groups would represent 1,000 engineering firms, 1,200 accounting
firms, 1,000 software and IT development firms, and 700 law firms. See
http://www.bls.gov/.
The
following chart offers a graphic illustration of these four main target
groups:
Our
Competition
We face
competition from other providers of software programs that may be used to
enhance time efficiency and project management. Some of these
providers are as follow:
Xpress
Software
DataArt
Autotask
AceProject
OPMcreator
Project
Drive
Many of
our competitors are located in the United States, and one of them has sold
approximately 500,000 units since it’s inception in
1997. http://www.advancedtimereports.com – by Xpress
Software Nevertheless, we believe that few of the existing
competitive software programs provide software applications that are of a
similar caliber to our proposed software product.
The
software products that are competitive to our proposed product have a static
user interface, which limits implementation and user flexibility. In
addition, we do not believe that our competition have been utilizing an
aggressive sales strategy. We believe we can outperform our
competition in product development, marketing and sales, user adaptability and
ease of implementation.
For
example, most software packages are generic, using a cookie cutter approach to
software design and implementation. While our initial product will be
generic so that it can be used in a wide range of businesses, we intend to
customize our software and create industry specific packages, tailored to the
needs of specific industries.
Research
and Development Activities and Costs
We have
not incurred any research and development costs to date since our management has
provided such activities at no cost to us. We intend to undertake
certain research and development activities commencing in August
2009. For a detailed description see "Plan of
Operation."
Employees
We have
commenced only limited operations; therefore, we have no employees. Our sole
officer and Director provides services to us on an as-needed basis. When we
commence full operations, we will need to hire full-time management and
administrative support staff.
Much of
the information included in this annual report includes or is based upon
estimates, projections or other "forward looking statements". Such
forward looking statements include any projections or estimates made by us and
our management in connection with our business operations. While
these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based,
are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction
of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially,
from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future
performance suggested herein.
Such
estimates, projections or other "forward looking statements" involve various
risks and uncertainties as outlined below. We caution the reader that
important factors in some cases have affected, and in the future could
materially affect, actual results and cause actual results to differ materially
from the results expressed in any such estimates, projections or other "forward
looking statements".
Risks
Relating to Our Lack of Operating History
1.
We have a going concern opinion from our auditors, indicating the possibility
that we may not be able to continue to operate.
The
Company has incurred net losses of $35,994 for the period from May 21, 2007
(date of inception) through March 31, 2009. We anticipate generating losses for
the next 12 months. We do not anticipate generating revenues prior to the end of
fiscal year 2010. Therefore, we may be unable to continue operations
in the future as a going concern. No adjustment has been made in the
accompanying financial statements to the amounts and classification of assets
and liabilities which could result should we be unable to continue as a going
concern. In addition, our independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph
in their report on the accompanying financial statements regarding concerns
about our ability to continue as a going concern.
As a
result, we may not be able to obtain additional necessary
funding. There can be no assurance that we will ever achieve any
revenues or profitability. The revenue and income potential of our proposed
business and operations are unproven, and the lack of operating history makes it
difficult to evaluate the future prospects of our business. If we cannot
continue as a viable entity, our stockholders may lose some or all of their
investment in the Company.
2.
We are a development stage company and may never be able to execute our business
plan.
We were
incorporated on May 21, 2007 in the state of Nevada. We currently
have no products, sales, customers, or revenues. Although we have begun initial
planning for the development of our management tool, we may not be able to
execute our business plan unless and until we are successful in raising funds in
this offering. We anticipate that we will require an additional
$30,500 to commence actual development, and to remain operational during the
next twelve months. If the securities being offered under this
prospectus are not fully subscribed for or we do not generate any revenues
during our first year of operations, we may require additional financing, in
addition to the funds we hope to raise from the sale of shares offered under
this offering, in order to establish profitable operations. Such
financing, if required, may not be forthcoming. Even if additional
financing is available, it may not be available on terms we find
favorable. Failure to secure the needed additional financing will
have a very serious effect on our company's ability to survive. At this time,
there are no anticipated additional sources of funds in place.
3.
Our business plan may be unsuccessful.
The
success of our business plan is dependent on our developing our web based
software solution to facilitate time and task management and improve the
efficiency of our potential clients' business operations. Our ability to develop
this management tool is unproven, and the lack of operating history makes it
difficult to validate our business plan. As a web-based company,
sales and marketing
will be
driven through our web site and through a third party independent sales force.
In addition, the success of our business plan is dependent upon the market
acceptance of our management tool. Should this management tool be too
narrowly focused or should the target market not be as responsive as we
anticipate, we will not have in place alternate services or products that we can
offer to ensure our continuation as a going concern.
4.
We have no operating history and have maintained losses since inception, which
we expect will continue in the future.
Management
believes that the raising of a minimum of $30,500 pursuant to this offering will
be sufficient to commence and continue our planned activities for approximately
12 months after the offering. However, we expect to continue to incur
operating losses in future periods. These losses will occur because we do not
yet have any revenues to offset the expenses associated with the development of
our web based management tool and the marketing and sale of our management tool.
We cannot guarantee that we will ever be successful in generating revenues in
the future. We recognize that if we are unable to generate revenues, we will not
be able to earn profits or continue operations.
There is
no history upon which to base any assumption as to the likelihood that we will
prove successful, and we can provide investors with no assurance that we will
generate any operating revenues or ever achieve profitable
operations. If we are unsuccessful in addressing these risks, our
business will most likely fail.
Risks
Relating to Our Business
5.
Our executive officer and Director has significant voting power and may take
actions that may be different than actions sought by our other
stockholders.
Our sole
officer and Director holds all of the outstanding shares of our common stock and
will hold 57.14% of the outstanding shares of our common stock if we issue all
of the shares being offered in this Registration Statement.
This
individual will be able to exercise significant influence over all matters
requiring stockholder approval. This influence over our affairs might
be adverse to the interest of our other stockholders. In addition,
this concentration of ownership could delay or prevent a change in control and
might have an adverse effect on the market price of our common
stock.
6.
Since our sole officer and Director may work or consult for other companies, his
other activities could slow down our operations.
Our sole
officer and Director is not required to work exclusively for us and does not
devote all of his time to our operations. Presently, our sole officer and
Director allocates only a portion of his time to the operation our business.
Since our officer and Director is currently employed full-time elsewhere, he is
able to commit to us only up to 10 hours a week. Therefore, it is
possible that his pursuit of other activities may slow our operations and reduce
our financial results because of the slow-down in operations.
7.
Our sole officer and Director is located in Dubai
Since our
sole officer and Director is located in Dubai, any attempts to enforce
liabilities upon him under the U.S. securities and bankruptcy laws may be
difficult.
8.
As a development stage company, we may experience substantial cost overruns in
developing and marketing our product, and we may not have sufficient capital to
successfully complete the development and marketing of our
product.
We may
experience substantial cost overruns in developing and marketing our software
product, and may not have sufficient capital to successfully complete our
project. We may not be able to develop or market our software product because of
industry conditions, general economic conditions, and/or competition from other
potential management tool developers and distributors. In addition, the
commercial success of any product is often dependent upon factors beyond the
control of the company attempting to market the product, including, but not
limited to, market acceptance of the product and whether or not third parties
promote the product through prominent marketing channels and/or other methods of
promotion.
Risks
Relating to Our Strategy and Industry
9.
Web based software and management tools are subject to rapid technological
change.
Our
business is in an emerging market that is characterized by rapid changes in
customer requirements, frequent introductions of new and enhanced products and
services, and continuing and rapid technological advancement. To compete
successfully in the web based management tools market, we must continue to
design, develop and sell new and enhanced tools that provide increasingly higher
levels of performance and reliability at lower cost. These new and enhanced
customized tools must take advantage of technological advancements and changes,
and respond to new customer requirements. Our success in designing,
developing, and selling such software tools will depend on a variety of factors,
including:
·
|
Identifying
and responding to market demand for new business management
tools;
|
·
|
The
scalability of our equipment platforms to efficiently deliver our
management tools;
|
·
|
Keeping
abreast of technological changes;
|
·
|
Timely
developing and implementing new and enhanced management tools and
features;
|
·
|
Maintaining
quality of performance;
|
·
|
Providing
cost-effective management tools and support;
and
|
·
|
Promoting
our management tools and expanding our market
share.
|
If we are
unable, due to resource constraints or technological or other reasons, to
develop and introduce new or enhanced management tools in a timely manner, if
such new or enhanced software tools do not achieve sufficient market acceptance,
or if such new tools decrease demand for our existing management tools, our
operating results would decline and our business would not grow.
10.
We are a small company with limited resources compared to some of our current
and potential competitors and we may not be able to compete effectively and
increase market share. Also, intense competition in the markets in
which we compete could prevent us from increasing or sustaining our revenue and
prevent us from achieving profitability.
Most of
our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories,
significantly greater resources and name recognition, and a larger base of
customers than we have. As a result, these competitors have greater credibility
with our potential customers. They also may be able to adopt more aggressive
pricing policies and devote greater resources to the development, promotion, and
sale of their products and services than we can to ours.
11.
We need to retain key personnel to support our services and ongoing
operations.
The
development of our web based management tool will continue to place a
significant strain on our limited personnel, management, and other
resources. Our future success depends upon the continued services of
our Director and other needed key contractors who have critical industry
experience and relationships that we rely on to implement our business
plan. The loss of the services of our sole officer or the lack of
availability of other skilled personnel would negatively impact our ability to
develop our web based software, which could adversely affect our financial
results and impair our growth.
12.
Because Mr. Shurrab has no experience in running a company that sells web based
software, he may not be able to successfully operate such a business, which
could cause you to lose your investment.
We are a
start-up company and we intend to market and sell our web based software. Mr.
Shurrab, our Director and President, has control over all decisions regarding
both the policy and the operations of our company. Our success is contingent
upon his ability to make appropriate business decisions in these areas. It is
possible that his lack of relevant operational experience could prevent us from
becoming a profitable business and prevent an investor from obtaining a return
on his investment in us.
13.Our
success depends on independent contractors to develop our product.
We intend
to rely on third party independent contractors for software development,
database design, website interface, web hosting, and for other development
functions. These third party developers may not dedicate sufficient
resources or give sufficient priority to developing our required
resources. There is no history upon which to base any assumption as
to the likelihood that we will prove successful in selecting qualified software
development contractors, and we can provide investors with no assurance that our
website and associated databases and administrative software will be developed
according to the specifications that we require. If we are
unsuccessful in addressing these risks, our business will most likely
fail.
14.
Future regulation of the internet could restrict our business, prevent us from
offering services, and/or increase our cost of doing
business.
The laws,
regulations or rulings that specifically address access to or commerce on the
internet are subject to change. We are unable to predict the impact, if any,
that future legislation, judicial precedents, or regulations concerning the
internet may have on our business, financial condition, and results of
operations. Regulation may be targeted towards, among other things, assessing
access or settlement charges, imposing taxes related to internet communications,
restricting content, imposing tariffs, or regulations based on encryption
concerns or the characteristics and quality of products and services, any of
which could restrict our business or increase our cost of doing business. The
increasing growth of the internet and popularity of broadband video products and
services heighten the risk that governments or other legislative bodies will
seek to regulate internet services, which could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition, and operating results.
15.
We may lose customers if we experience system failures that significantly
disrupt the availability and quality of the support services that we
plan to provide.
The
operation of our support services will depend on our ability to avoid and
mitigate any interruptions in service or reduced capacity for
customers. Interruptions in service or software performance problems,
for whatever reason, could undermine confidence in our ability to provide
service to our customers, and could cause us to lose customers or make it more
difficult to attract new ones. In addition, because our support services may be
critical to the businesses of our customers, any significant interruption in the
provision of service could result in lost profits or other losses to our
customers.
16.
Establishing a new brand of management tools requires effective marketing and
product placement which may take a long period of time.
Our
principal business strategy is to develop our brand name as a respected brand
associated with web-based management tools. The marketing of our
intended product is highly dependent on our creating a favorable corporate
management perception. However, we have minimal advertising
experience. Competitors have significantly greater advertising
resources and experience and enjoy well-established brand
names. There can be no assurance that our initial advertising and
promotional activities will be successful in creating the desired
perception.
17.
If a third party asserts that we infringe its proprietary rights, we could be
required to redesign our software, pay significant royalties, or enter into
license agreements.
Although
presently we are not aware of any such claims, a third party may assert that our
technology or third party technologies that we license violate its intellectual
property rights. As the number of software products in our market increases and
the functionality of these software products further overlap, we believe that
infringement claims will become more common. Any claims against us,
regardless of their merit, could:
·
|
Be
expensive and time-consuming to
defend;
|
·
|
Result
in negative publicity;
|
·
|
Force
us to stop selling our services that rely on the challenged intellectual
property;
|
·
|
Require
us to redesign our software products;
|
·
|
Divert
management’s attention and our other resources; or
|
·
|
Require
us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements in order to obtain the
right to use necessary technologies, which may not be available on terms
acceptable to us, if at all.
|
We
believe that any successful challenge to our use of a trademark or domain name
could substantially diminish our ability to conduct business in a particular
market or jurisdiction and thus could decrease our revenues and/or result in
losses to our business.
Risks
Relating to our becoming a Public Reporting Company
18.
Our costs will increase significantly as a result of operating as a public
reporting company and our management will be required to devote substantial time
to comply with public company rules and regulations.
Following
this offering, as a public company, we will incur significant legal, financial,
accounting and other costs and expenses that we did not incur as a private
company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) and rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and various exchanges,
including the Nasdaq Stock Market, have imposed various requirements on public
companies, including changes in corporate governance practices and disclosures.
Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of
time to ensure ongoing compliance with these new requirements. As a result of
these costs, our net earnings may be reduced and we may not be able to devote
sufficient attention to achieving our business objectives
Risks
Relating to doing business in India and the Middle East
19.
Because we plan to outsource a significant portion of our software development
to India and the Middle East, we may be subject to political instability that
could harm our business.
We plan
to outsource a significant portion of our software development activities to
software developers located in India and the Middle East, in order to take
advantage of cost efficiencies associated with the lower wage scale in India and
the Middle East. Due to our planned development activities in India
and the Middle East, we are exposed to risks related to changes in the economic,
security, and political conditions of India and the Middle East. Economic and
political instability, military actions, and other unforeseen occurrences in
India and/or the Middle East could impair our ability to continue our software
development in a timely manner, which could put our products at
a competitive disadvantage.
Executive
Offices
We do not
own any real property. We currently maintain our corporate office at 601 Union
Street, Two Union Square, 42nd Floor,
Seattle, Washington 98101. We pay monthly rent of $150 for use of
this space. This space is sufficient until we commence full
operations.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We know
of no material, active, or pending legal proceeding against our company, nor are
we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation
there such claim or action involves damages for more than 10% of our current
assets. There are no proceedings in which any of our company’s
directors, officers, or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial
shareholders, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our
company’s interest.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS
No
matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2009.
PART
II
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Market
for Securities
As at the
date of this document, the Company has not received its trading symbol yet or
has developed a market for its securities.
Holders
of our Common Stock
On June
29, 2009 the shareholders’ list of our common stock showed 36 registered
shareholders and 2,280,000 shares outstanding.
Dividend
Policy
We have
not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and have no present intention of
paying any dividends on the shares of our common stock. Our future
dividend policy will be determined from time to time by our board of
directors.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not
Applicable.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited financial
statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this annual
report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements
that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results
could differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking
statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such
differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this annual
report.
Our
audited consolidated financial statements are stated in United States dollars
and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting
principles.
Application
of Critical Accounting Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
year. The more significant areas requiring the use of estimates
include asset impairment, stock-based compensation, and future income tax
amounts. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and
on other assumptions considered to be reasonable under the
circumstances. However, actual results may differ from the
estimates.
Overview
We are a
development stage company with limited operations and no revenues from our
business operations. Our registered independent auditors have issued a going
concern opinion. This means that our registered independent auditors believe
there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the
next 12 months. Accordingly, we must raise cash from sources other
than our operations in order to implement our sales and marketing
plan.
Plan
of Operation
Our plan
of operation for the twelve months ended March 31, 2010 is as
follows:
First
Quarter
During
the first three months following the offering, we plan to:
·
|
Commence
development of our software
|
·
|
Initiate
the development of our corporate and marketing
collateral
|
Software development:
In the First Quarter we intend to commence our software development
activities. The initial analysis and viability of the prototype stage
has already been completed by management. In particular, we plan to select a
third party contractor to develop the software, including planning the software
and database design. Once we complete the prototype stage we will be
able to test the product and start actual development of the software. This will
include writing the code, database design and implementation and
testing.
Marketing activities:
In the First Quarter we intend to focus on building a strong web
presence. We plan to achieve this by designing a website. We plan to then
achieve a web presence by using search engine optimization tools including key
word strategies and link exchanges with industry related websites. We will
continue to market our website and our product on an ongoing basis.
Second
Quarter
During
the next three months, we expect to achieve the following:
·
|
Continue
development of our software product
|
·
|
Expand
web of link exchanges
|
·
|
Initiate
lead generation
|
·
|
Advertise
with search engines such as Yahoo and
Google
|
Marketing activities:
In the second quarter, we plan to continue to expand our web of link exchanges
with industry and related sites in order to generate leads. We also plan to
initiate search engine advertising on Yahoo and Google.
Third
Quarter
During
the third quarter, we expect to achieve the following:
·
|
Initiate
an email campaign
|
·
|
Complete
a beta version of our software
product
|
Marketing activities:
In the third quarter, we intend to target potential leads through e-mail
campaigns and cold calls.
Fourth
Quarter
During
the fourth quarter, we expect to achieve the following:
·
|
Complete
a ready-for-sale version of our software
product
|
·
|
Continue
with marketing activities
|
Marketing activities:
In the fourth quarter we intend to continue to generate new leads of potential
clients, execute e-mail campaigns, and increase cold calls.
Off
Balance Sheet Transactions
We have
had no off balance sheet transactions.
Significant
Equipment
We do not
intend to purchase any significant equipment for the next twelve
months.
Results
of Operations
Revenues
We had no
revenues for the period from May 21, 2007 (date of inception), through March 31,
2009.
Expenses
Our
expenses for the twelve month period ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, were $26,368
and $9,626. During the period from May
21, 2007 (date of inception), through March 31, 2009, we incurred expenses of
$35,994. These expenses were comprised primarily
of general and administrative, and legal and accounting expenses, as well as
banking fees.
Net
Income (Loss)
Our net
loss for the twelve-month period ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $26,368 and
$9,626. During the period from May 21, 2007 (date of inception),
through March 31, 2009, we incurred a net loss of $35,994. This loss
consisted primarily of incorporation costs, legal and accounting fees,
consulting fees, website hosting costs, and administrative
expenses. Since inception, we have sold 2,280,000 shares of common
stock.
Purchase
or Sale of Equipment
We do not
expect to purchase or sell any plant or significant equipment.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our
balance sheet as of March 31, 2009 reflects assets of $31,094 in the form of
cash and cash equivalents and prepaid expenses. Since inception, we
have sold 2,280,000 shares of common stock with gross proceeds of
$53,000. However, cash resources provided from our capital formation
activities have, from inception, been insufficient to provide the working
capital necessary to operate our Company.
We
anticipate generating losses in the near term, and therefore, may be unable to
continue operations in the future. If we require additional capital,
we would have to issue debt or equity or enter into a strategic arrangement with
a third party. There can be no assurance that additional capital will
be available to us. We currently have no agreements, arrangements, or
understandings with any person to obtain funds through bank loans, lines of
credit, or any other sources.
Going
Concern Consideration
Our
registered independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph in their
report on the accompanying financial statements regarding concerns about our
ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements contain
additional note disclosures describing the circumstances that lead to this
disclosure by our registered independent auditors.
Due to
this doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, management is open
to new business opportunities which may prove more profitable to the
shareholders of Interpro Management Corp Historically, we have been
able to raise a limited amount of capital through private placements of our
equity stock, but we are uncertain about our continued ability to raise funds
privately. Further, we believe that our company may have difficulties
raising capital until we locate a prospective business opportunity through which
we can pursue our plan of operation. If we are unable to secure adequate capital
to continue our acquisition efforts, our business may fail and our stockholders
may lose some or all of their investment.
Should
our original business plan fail, we anticipate that the selection of a business
opportunity in which to participate will be complex and without certainty of
success. Management believes that there are numerous firms in various industries
seeking the perceived benefits of being a publicly registered corporation.
Business opportunities may be available in many different industries and at
various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative
investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult
and complex. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to locate
compatible business opportunities.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
MOORE
& ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED
ACCOUNTANTS AND
ADVISORS
PCAOB
REGISTERED
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To
the Board of Directors
Interpro
Management Corp
(A
Development Stage Company)
We have
audited the accompanying balance sheets of Interpro Management Corp (A
Development Stage Company) as of March 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the
year ended March 31, 2009, and the periods from inception on May 21, 2007
through March 31, 2008 and 2009. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
We
conduct our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Interpro Management Corp (A
Development Stage Company) as of March 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended
March 31, 2009, and the periods from inception on May 21, 2007 through March 31,
2008 and 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company
will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the
financial statements, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $35,994, which
raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also
described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/
Moore & Associates, Chartered
Moore
& Associates, Chartered
Las
Vegas, Nevada
June 23,
2009
6490 West Desert Inn Rd, Las
Vegas, NV 89146 (702) 253-7499 Fax (702) 253-7501
Interpro
Management Corp
(A
Development Stage Company)
Balance
Sheets
March
31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
March
31,
2009
|
|
|
March
31,
2008
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
30,864 |
|
|
$ |
20,073 |
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Current Assets
|
|
|
31,094 |
|
|
|
20,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$ |
31,094 |
|
|
$ |
20,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
9,250 |
|
|
$ |
6,500 |
|
Due
to related party
|
|
|
3,838 |
|
|
|
3,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
13,088 |
|
|
|
9,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
|
13,088 |
|
|
|
9,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock authorized -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000,000 common
shares with a par value of $0.001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
shares issued and outstanding -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,280,0000 common
shares (2008:
1,600,000)
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
Additional
paid in capital
|
|
|
51,720 |
|
|
|
18,400 |
|
Deficit
accumulated during the development stage
|
|
|
(35,994 |
) |
|
|
(9,626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
18,006 |
|
|
|
10,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
|
|
$ |
31,094 |
|
|
$ |
20,073 |
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements
Interpro
Management Corp
(A
Development Stage Company)
Statements
of Operations
|
|
Year
Ended
March
31,
2009
|
|
|
Period
from Inception
(May
21, 2007) to
March
31,
2008
|
|
|
Period
from Inception
(May
21, 2007) to
March
31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal
and accounting
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Web
and software development
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
9,368 |
|
|
|
3,126 |
|
|
|
12,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
expenses
|
|
|
26,368 |
|
|
|
9,626 |
|
|
|
35,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(Loss)
|
|
$ |
(26,368 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,626 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,994 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
(
0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,696,877 |
|
|
|
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements
Interpro
Management Corp
(A
Development Stage Company)
Statements
of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Additional
Paid
in
Capital
|
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
During
Development
Stage
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
May 21, 2007 (date of inception)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
$ |
¾ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
issued to founder on May 21, 2007 @ $0.0125 per share (par value $0.001
per share)
|
|
|
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
18,400 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Net
(loss) for the period from inception on May 21, 2007 to March 31,
2008
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(9,626 |
) |
|
|
(9,626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
18,400 |
|
|
|
(9,626 |
) |
|
|
10,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private
placement on February 10, 2009 @ $0.05 per share (par value $0.001 per
share)
|
|
|
680,000 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
33,320 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
Net
(loss) for the year-ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(26,368 |
) |
|
|
(26,368 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
2,280,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,280 |
|
|
$ |
51,720 |
|
|
$ |
(35,994 |
) |
|
$ |
18,006 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
Interpro
Management Corp
(A
Development Stage Company)
Statements
of Cash Flows
|
|
Year
Ended
March
31,
2009
|
|
|
Period
from Inception
(May
21, 2007) to
March
31,
2008
|
|
|
Period
from Inception
(May
21, 2007) to
March
31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(Loss)
|
|
$ |
(26,368 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,626 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,994 |
) |
(Increase)
in prepaid expenses
|
|
|
( 230 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( 230 |
) |
Increase
in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
9,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(23,848 |
) |
|
|
(3,126 |
) |
|
|
(26,974 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
in due to stockholder
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
3,199 |
|
|
|
3,838 |
|
Proceeds
from sale of stock
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
provided by financing activities
|
|
|
34,639 |
|
|
|
23,199 |
|
|
|
57,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease) in cash
|
|
|
10,791 |
|
|
|
20,073 |
|
|
|
30,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash,
opening
|
|
|
20,073 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash,
closing
|
|
$ |
30,864 |
|
|
$ |
20,073 |
|
|
$ |
30,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Income
taxes
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
Interpro
Management Corp
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Financial Statements
March
31, 2009
Note
1 – Nature of Operations
Interpro
Management Corp (“the Company”), incorporated in the state of Nevada on May 21,
2007, is a company with business activities focused on developing and offering
web based software that will be designed to be an online project management tool
used to enhance an organization’s efficiency through planning and monitoring the
daily operations of a business.
The
company has limited operations and in accordance with SFAS#7 is considered to be
in the development stage.
Note
2 – Going Concern
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the company
will continue as a going concern. As discussed in the notes to the
financial statements, the Company has no established source of
revenue. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern. Without realization of additional
capital, it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might result from this uncertainty.
The
Company’s activities to date have been supported by equity
financing. It has sustained losses in all previous reporting periods
with an inception to date loss of $35,994 as of March 31,
2009. Management continues to seek funding from its shareholders
and other qualified investors to pursue its business plan. In the
alternative, the Company may be amenable to a sale, merger or other
acquisition in the event such transaction is deemed by
management
to be in the best interests of the shareholders.
Note
3 – Significant Accounting Policies
Accounting
Basis
These
financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Financial
Instrument
The
Company's financial instrument consists of amount due to
stockholder.
The
amount due to stockholder is non interest-bearing. It is management's
opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or
credit risks arising from its other financial instruments and that their fair
values approximate their carrying values except where separately
disclosed.
Property
The
Company does not own any property. Our office space is leased to us on a
month to month basis for approximately $150 per month.
Interpro
Management Corp
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Financial Statements
March
31, 2009
Note
3 – Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles of the United States requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year.
The more significant areas requiring the use of estimates include asset
impairment, stock-based compensation, and future income tax amounts. Management
bases its estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions considered
to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual results may differ
from the estimates.
Advertising
The
Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. The Company has had
no advertising activity since inception.
Loss
Per Share
Basic
loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding and the treasury stock method is used to calculate diluted earnings
per share. For the years presented, this calculation proved to be
anti-dilutive.
Dividends
The
Company has not adopted any policy regarding payment of dividends. No
dividends have been paid during the period shown.
Income
Taxes
The
Company provides for income taxes under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards NO. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” SFAS No. 109 requires the use
of an asset and liability approach in accounting for income taxes.
SFAS No.
109 requires the reduction of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if,
based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some
or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. No provision
for income taxes is included in the statement due to its immaterial amount, net
of the allowance account, based on the likelihood of the Company to utilize the
loss carry-forward.
Net
Income Per Common Share
Net
income (loss) per common share is computed based on the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents, if not
anti-dilutive. The Company has not issued any potentially dilutive
common shares.
Interpro
Management Corp
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Financial Statements
March
31, 2009
Note
4 – Due to Stockholder
The
amount owing to stockholder is unsecured, non-interest bearing and
has no specific terms of repayment.
Note
5 – Capital stock
Common
Shares - Authorized
The
company has 100,000,000 common shares authorized at a par value of $0.001 per
share.
Common
Shares – Issued and Outstanding
During
the period ended March 31, 2008, the company issued 1,600,000 common shares for
total proceeds of $20,000.
During
the year ended March 31, 2009, the company issued 680,000 common shares for
total proceeds of $34,000.
As at
March 31, 2009, the Company had 2,280,000 common shares issued and
outstanding.
As at
March 31, 2009, the Company has no warrants or options outstanding.
Note
6 – Income Taxes
The
Company provides for income taxes under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires the use of an asset and liability
approach in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recorded based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases
of assets and liabilities and the tax rates in effect currently.
SFAS No.
109 requires the reduction of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if,
based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some
or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In the Company’s
opinion, it is uncertain whether they will generate sufficient taxable income in
the future to fully utilize the net deferred tax asset. Accordingly,
a valuation allowance equal to the deferred tax asset has been
recorded. The total deferred tax asset is $7,919, which is calculated
by multiplying a 22% estimated tax rate by the cumulative NOL of
$35,994.
The
company has non-capital losses of $35,994.
Note
7 – Related Party Transactions
As at
March 31, 2009, there is a balance owing to a stockholder of the Company in the
amount of $3,838.
The
officers and directors of the Company are involved in other business activities
and may, in the future, become involved in other business opportunities that
become available. They may face a conflict in selecting between the
Company and other business interests. The Company has not formulated a policy
for the resolution of such conflicts.
Interpro
Management Corp
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Financial Statements
March
31, 2009
Note
8 - Concentrations of Risks
Cash
Balances -
The
Company maintains its cash in institutions insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC). This government corporation insured
balances up to $100,000 through October 13, 2008. As of October 14,
2008 all non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts at an FDIC-insured
institution, including all personal and business checking deposit accounts that
do not earn interest, are fully insured for the entire amount in the deposit
account. This unlimited insurance coverage is temporary and will
remain in effect for participating institutions until December 31,
2009.
All other
deposit accounts at FDIC-insured institutions are insured up to at least
$250,000 per depositor until December 31, 2009. On January 1, 2010,
FDIC deposit insurance for all deposit accounts, except for certain retirement
accounts, will return to at least $100,000 per depositor. Insurance
coverage for certain retirement accounts, which include all IRA deposit
accounts, will remain at $250,000 per depositor.
Note
9 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Below is
a listing of the most recent accounting standards and their effect on the
Company.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume
and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased
and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (“FSP FAS
157-4”). FSP FAS 157-4 provides guidance on estimating fair value
when market activity has decreased and on identifying transactions that are not
orderly. Additionally, entities are required to disclose in interim
and annual periods the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair
value. This FSP is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP
FAS 157-4 will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of
operation.
In
December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, “Disclosures
by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and
Interests in Variable Interest Entities.” This disclosure-only FSP
improves the transparency of transfers of financial assets and an enterprise’s
involvement with variable interest entities, including qualifying
special-purpose entities. This FSP is effective for the first
reporting period (interim or annual) ending after December 15, 2008, with
earlier application encouraged. The Company adopted this FSP
effective January 1, 2009. The adoption of the FSP had no impact
on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash
flows.
In
December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures
about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets” (“FSP FAS 132(R)-1”). FSP
FAS 132(R)-1 requires additional fair value disclosures about employers’ pension
and postretirement benefit plan assets consistent with guidance contained in
SFAS 157. Specifically, employers will be required to disclose
information about how investment allocation decisions are made, the fair value
of each major category of plan assets and information about the inputs and
valuation techniques used to develop the fair value measurements of plan assets.
This FSP is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15,
2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP FAS 132(R)-1
will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of
operation.
Interpro
Management Corp
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Financial Statements
March
31, 2009
Note
9 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
In
October 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of
a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active,” (“FSP FAS
157-3”), which clarifies application of SFAS 157 in a market that is not
active. FSP FAS 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including prior
periods for which financial statements have not been issued. The
adoption of FSP FAS 157-3 had no impact on the Company’s results of operations,
financial condition or cash flows.
In
September 2008, the FASB issued exposure drafts that eliminate qualifying
special purpose entities from the guidance of SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities,” and FASB Interpretation 46 (revised December 2003),
“Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities − an
interpretation of ARB No. 51,” as well as other
modifications. While the proposed revised pronouncements have not
been finalized and the proposals are subject to further public comment, the
Company anticipates the changes will not have a significant impact on the
Company’s financial statements. The changes would be effective March
1, 2010, on a prospective basis.
In
June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities,
(“FSP EITF 03-6-1”). FSP EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in
share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting,
and therefore need to be included in the computation of earnings per share under
the two-class method as described in FASB Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning on or after
December 15, 2008 and earlier adoption is prohibited. We are not required
to adopt FSP EITF 03-6-1; neither do we believe that FSP EITF 03-6-1 would have
material effect on our consolidated financial position and results of
operations if adopted.
In May
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 163,
“Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts-and interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 60”. SFAS No. 163 clarifies how Statement 60
applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition
and measurement of premium revenue and claims liabilities. This statement also
requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts.
SFAS No. 163 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15,
2008, and interim periods within those years. SFAS No. 163 has no effect on the
Company’s financial position, statements of operations, or cash flows at this
time.
In May
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 162,
“The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. SFAS No.
162 sets forth the level of authority to a given accounting pronouncement or
document by category. Where there might be conflicting guidance between two
categories, the more authoritative category will prevail. SFAS No. 162 will
become effective 60 days after the SEC approves the PCAOB’s amendments to AU
Section 411 of the AICPA Professional Standards. SFAS No. 162 has no effect on
the Company’s financial position, statements of operations, or cash flows at
this time.
Interpro
Management Corp
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Financial Statements
March
31, 2009
Note
9 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
In
December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 110 regarding
the use of a "simplified" method, as discussed in SAB No. 107 (SAB 107), in
developing an estimate of expected term of "plain vanilla" share options in
accordance with SFAS No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment. In particular,
the staff indicated in SAB 107 that it will accept a company's election to use
the simplified method, regardless of whether the company has sufficient
information to make more refined estimates of expected term. At the time SAB 107
was issued, the staff believed that more detailed external information about
employee exercise behavior (e.g., employee exercise patterns by industry and/or
other categories of companies) would, over time, become readily available to
companies. Therefore, the staff stated in SAB 107 that it would not expect a
company to use the simplified method for share
option
grants after December 31, 2007. The staff understands that such detailed
information about employee exercise behavior may not be widely available by
December 31, 2007. Accordingly, the staff will continue to accept, under certain
circumstances, the use of the simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. The
Company currently uses the simplified method for “plain vanilla” share options
and warrants, and will assess the impact of SAB 110 for fiscal year 2009. It is
not believed that this will have an impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51. This
statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an
ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity
in the consolidated financial statements. Before this statement was issued,
limited guidance existed for reporting noncontrolling interests. As a result,
considerable diversity in practice existed. So-called minority interests were
reported in the consolidated statement of financial position as liabilities or
in the mezzanine section between liabilities and equity. This statement improves
comparability by eliminating that diversity. This statement is effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or
after December 15, 2008 (that is, January 1, 2009, for entities with calendar
year-ends). Earlier adoption is prohibited. The effective date of this statement
is the same as that of the related Statement 141 (revised 2007). The Company
will adopt this Statement beginning March 1, 2009. It is not believed that this
will have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In
December 2007, the FASB, issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations’. This Statement replaces FASB Statement No. 141,
Business Combinations, but retains the fundamental requirements in
Statement 141. This Statement establishes principles and
requirements for how the acquirer: (a) recognizes and measures in its financial
statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; (b) recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase;
and (c) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial
statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business
combination. This statement applies prospectively to business combinations for
which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An entity may not
apply it before that date. The effective date of this statement is the same as
that of the related FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company will adopt this
statement beginning March 1, 2009. It is not believed that this will have an
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
Interpro
Management Corp
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Financial Statements
March
31, 2009
Note
9 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
In March
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 133. This standard requires companies to provide
enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company has not yet
adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 161, but does not expect it to have a
material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
In
February 2007, the FASB, issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Liabilities—Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No.
115. This standard permits an entity to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This option is
available to all entities. Most of the provisions in FAS 159 are elective;
however, an amendment to FAS 115 Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities applies to all entities with available for sale or trading
securities. Some requirements apply differently to entities that do not report
net income. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first
fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as
of the beginning of the previous fiscal year provided that the entity makes that
choice in the first 120 days of that fiscal year and also elects to apply the
provisions of SFAS No. 157 Fair Value Measurements. The Company will
adopt SFAS No. 159 beginning March 1, 2008 and is currently evaluating the
potential impact the adoption of this pronouncement will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Management’s
Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial
reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial
officers and effected by the company’s board of directors, management and other
personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America and includes those policies and procedures
that:
|
-
|
Pertain
to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets
of the company;
|
|
-
|
Provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that
receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and
|
|
-
|
Provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
|
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control
systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent
limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective
can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement
preparation and presentation. Because of the inherent limitations of
internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial
reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the
financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into
the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.
As of
March 31, 2009 management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control
over financial reporting established in Internal Control--Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
("COSO") and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on
that evaluation, they concluded that, during the period covered by this report,
such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the
inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described
below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or
operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely
affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material
weaknesses.
The
matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management
considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board were: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee due
to a lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of
outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight
in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and
procedures; (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control
objectives; and (3) ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure
and reporting processes. The aforementioned material weaknesses were
identified by our Chief Executive Officer in connection with the audit of
our financial statements as of March 31, 2009.
Management
believes that the material weaknesses set forth in items (2) and (3) above did
not have an effect on our financial results. However, management
believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a
majority of outside directors on our board of directors results in ineffective
oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and
procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial
statements in future periods.
This
annual report does not include an attestation report of the Corporation's
registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the
Corporation's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of
the SEC that permit the Corporation to provide only the management's report in
this annual report.
Management’s
Remediation Initiatives
In an
effort to remediate the identified material weaknesses and other deficiencies
and enhance our internal controls, we have initiated, or plan to initiate, the
following series of measures:
We will
create a position to segregate duties consistent with control objectives and
will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within
the accounting function when funds are available to us. And, we plan
to appoint one or more outside directors to our board of directors who shall be
appointed to an audit committee resulting in a fully functioning audit committee
who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required
internal controls and procedures such as reviewing and approving estimates and
assumptions made by management when funds are available to us.
Management
believes that the appointment of one or more outside directors, who shall be
appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a
functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our
Board.
We
anticipate that these initiatives will be at least partially, if not fully,
implemented by December 31, 2009. Additionally, we plan to test our
updated controls and remediate our deficiencies by December 31,
2009.
ITEM 9B. OTHER
INFORMATION
None.
PART
III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Our
Officers and Directors and their ages and positions are as follows:
Our
officers and directors and their ages and positions are as follows:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mohanad
Shurrab
|
|
33
|
|
President,
Secretary, Treasurer, and
Director
|
Mr.
Mohanad Shurrab has been our President, Treasurer, Secretary and a Director
since May 21, 2007.
In 1997
Mr. Shurrab earned his Masters Degrees with Honors in Engineering, Electronics
and Computer Science from Sussex University in the United Kingdom.
Mr.
Shurrab has extensive experience in project management, computer programming,
internet and networking, web applications and database
management. His work experience stretches from Eastern Canada to the
UK and the Middle East. His career includes work in IT management,
and working as a systems analyst, software engineer and software architect for
private and public companies and government institutions.
Since
2003, Mr. Shurrab has worked as a project manager managing offshore and local
development teams to develop various enterprise applications for clients in the
U.S. and Canada. Mr. Shurrab has led multiple development teams to design and
implement various small and medium sized applications including enterprise
applications, eCommerce, work flow management, content management, issue
tracking in .NET, VB, C#, ASP.NET, MSSQL, PHP, and UML. Since 2003, Mr. Shurrab
has supervised and participated in drafting various operational manuals and
custom built software application manuals, in relation to various clients’
business processes.
From 2001
to 2003 Mr. Shurrab was a software engineer for the Bell Aliant Group. While
with the Bell Aliant Group, Mr. Shurrab position was a software engineer for
various defense and aerospace projects. Mr. Shurrab also participated in the
development of the Aircraft Tactical Mission Trainer Simulator designed to train
Canadian army navigators.
Audit
Committee
We do not
have an audit committee at this time.
Code
of Ethics
We
currently do not have a Code of Ethics.
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors,
executive officers, and stockholders holding more than 10% of our outstanding
common stock, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial
reports of ownership and reports of changes in beneficial ownership of our
common stock. Executive officers, directors and greater-than-10%
stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all
Section 16(a) reports they file. To our knowledge, based solely
on review of the copies of such reports furnished to us for the period ended
March 31, 2009, no Section 16(a) reports required to be filed by our
executive officers, directors and greater-than-10% stockholders were not filed
on a timely basis.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The
following table sets forth the cash compensation paid to the Chief Executive
Officer and to all other executive officers for services rendered during the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
Annual
Compensation
|
Long
Term Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
Payouts
|
|
Name
and
Principal
Position
|
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
|
Other
|
Securities
Underlying
Options/
SARs
Granted
|
Restricted
Shares
or
Restricted
Share
Units
|
LTIP
Payouts
|
All
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Mohanad
Shurrab
|
2008
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
President, Treasurer,
|
2009
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
Secretary
and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Option
awards
|
Stock
awards
|
Number
of securities underlying unexercised options
(#)
exercisable
|
Number
of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
(#)
unexercisable
|
Equity
incentive
plan
awards:
Number
of
securities
underlying
unexercised
unearned
options
(#)
|
Option
exercise
price
($)
|
Option
expiration
date
|
Number
of
shares
or
units
of
stock
that
have
not
vested (#)
|
Market
value
of shares of units of
stock
that have not vested
($)
|
Equity
incentive
plan
awards:
Number
of unearned
shares,
units
or
other
rights
that
have
not
vested (#)
|
Equity
incentive
plan
awards:
Market
or
payout
value
of
unearned
shares,
units
or
others
rights
that
have
not
vested
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Mohanad
Shurrab
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Option
Grants and Exercises
There
were no option grants or exercises by any of the executive officers named in the
Summary Compensation Table above.
Employment
Agreements
We have
not entered into employment and/or consultant agreements with our Directors and
officers.
Compensation
of Directors
All
directors receive reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in
attending board of directors meetings and for promoting our
business. From time to time we may engage certain members of the
board of directors to perform services on our behalf. In such cases,
we compensate the members for their services at rates no more favorable than
could be obtained from unaffiliated parties. Our directors have not received any
compensation for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.
ITEM 12. SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The table
below sets forth the number and percentage of shares of our common stock owned
as of December 29, 2008, by the following persons: (i) stockholders known to us
who own 5% or more of our outstanding shares, (ii) each of our Directors, and
(iii) our officers and Directors as a group. Unless otherwise
indicated, each of the stockholders has sole voting and investment power with
respect to the shares beneficially owned.
Title
of Class
|
Name and Address of Beneficial
Owner(²)
|
Amount
and Nature
of
Beneficial Ownership
|
Percentage
of Class(¹)
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
Mr. Mohanad
Shurrab
|
1,600,000
|
70.0
%
|
|
|
|
|
All
Officers as a Group
|
|
1,600,000
|
70.0
%
|
(¹) Based
on 2,280,000 shares of our common stock outstanding.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
Other
than the transactions discussed below, we have not entered into any transaction
nor are there any proposed transactions in which any of our Directors, executive
officers, stockholders or any member of the immediate family of any of the
foregoing had or is to have a direct or indirect material interest.
As of
March 31, 2009, there is a balance owing to one of our stockholders in the
amount of $3,838. This balance is unsecured, non-interest bearing and
has no specific terms of repayment.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Audit
Fees
For the
year ended March 31, 2009, Moore and Associates, Chartered billed us for $3,500
in audit fees.
Review
Fees
Moore and
Associates, Chartered, billed us $4,500 for reviews of our quarterly financial
statements in 2008 and are not reported under Audit Fees above.
Tax
and All Other Fees
We did
not pay any fees to Moore and Associates, Chartered for tax compliance, tax
advice, tax planning or other work during our fiscal year ended March 31,
2009
Pre-Approval
Policies and Procedures
We have
implemented pre-approval policies and procedures related to the provision of
audit and non-audit services. Under these procedures, our board of
directors pre-approves all services to be provided by Moore and Associates,
Chartered and the estimated fees related to these services.
PART
IV
Exhibit
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles
of Incorporation of Registrant *
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws
of Registrant *
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen
Common Stock Certificate. *
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Opinion
of SRK Law Offices regarding the legality of the securities being
registered. *
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent
of Moore & Associates, Chartered. *
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
Consent
of Legal Counsel (incorporated in Exhibit 5.1). *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Attached as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 originally
filed with the SEC on July 16, 2008, and incorporated herein by
reference.
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
INTERPRO
MANAGEMENT CORP
|
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2009 |
By:/s/
Mohanad
Shurrab
|
|
Mohanad
Shurrab
|
|
President,
Treasurer, Secretary, and Director
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities indicated.
Signatures
|
Title
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mohanad Shurrab
|
President,
Treasurer, Secretary, and Director
|
June
29, 2009
|
Mohanad
Shurrab |
|
|