UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012 or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 2-40764
KANSAS CITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Missouri | 44-0308260 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
3520 Broadway, Kansas City, Missouri | 64111-2565 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
816-753-7000
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ |
Accelerated filer x |
Non-accelerated filer ¨ |
Smaller reporting company ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, $1.25 par | 11,309,477 shares | |
Class | Outstanding March 31, 2012 |
KANSAS CITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
2
Amounts in thousands, except share data, or as otherwise noted
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31 2012 |
December 31 2011 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Investments: |
||||||||
Fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value |
$ | 2,770,777 | $ | 2,682,142 | ||||
Equity securities available for sale, at fair value |
37,245 | 36,689 | ||||||
Mortgage loans |
573,702 | 601,923 | ||||||
Real estate |
98,595 | 127,962 | ||||||
Policy loans |
79,574 | 80,375 | ||||||
Short-term investments |
54,293 | 49,316 | ||||||
Other investments |
3,113 | 3,364 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total investments |
3,617,299 | 3,581,771 | ||||||
Cash |
5,172 | 10,436 | ||||||
Accrued investment income |
38,981 | 34,705 | ||||||
Deferred acquisition costs |
179,987 | 181,564 | ||||||
Reinsurance receivables |
191,214 | 189,885 | ||||||
Property and equipment |
22,419 | 22,671 | ||||||
Other assets |
60,576 | 60,601 | ||||||
Separate account assets |
341,250 | 316,609 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 4,456,898 | $ | 4,398,242 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Future policy benefits |
$ | 880,071 | $ | 879,015 | ||||
Policyholder account balances |
2,105,428 | 2,089,452 | ||||||
Policy and contract claims |
33,836 | 36,511 | ||||||
Other policyholder funds |
151,005 | 152,125 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
217,661 | 213,825 | ||||||
Separate account liabilities |
341,250 | 316,609 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
3,729,251 | 3,687,537 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Common stock, par value $1.25 per share |
||||||||
Authorized 36,000,000 shares, issued 18,496,680 shares |
23,121 | 23,121 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital |
41,106 | 41,101 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
797,305 | 780,918 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
30,636 | 30,086 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost (2012 - 7,187,203 shares; 2011 - 7,187,315 shares) |
(164,521 | ) | (164,521 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders equity |
727,647 | 710,705 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 4,456,898 | $ | 4,398,242 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
3
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Quarter Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
REVENUES |
||||||||
Insurance revenues: |
||||||||
Premiums, net |
$ | 32,704 | $ | 33,625 | ||||
Contract charges |
25,133 | 26,234 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total insurance revenues |
57,837 | 59,859 | ||||||
Investment revenues: |
||||||||
Net investment income |
44,209 | 45,391 | ||||||
Net realized investment gains, excluding impairment losses |
15,837 | 1,012 | ||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings: |
||||||||
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses |
(268 | ) | (269 | ) | ||||
Portion of impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive income |
108 | 58 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
(160 | ) | (211 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total investment revenues |
59,886 | 46,192 | ||||||
Other revenues |
2,185 | 2,408 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total revenues |
119,908 | 108,459 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
BENEFITS AND EXPENSES |
||||||||
Policyholder benefits |
38,470 | 45,274 | ||||||
Interest credited to policyholder account balances |
20,558 | 20,481 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs |
7,901 | 9,584 | ||||||
Operating expenses |
23,962 | 25,865 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total benefits and expenses |
90,891 | 101,204 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income before income tax expense |
29,017 | 7,255 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
9,576 | 2,464 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
NET INCOME |
$ | 19,441 | $ | 4,791 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive income, net of taxes: |
||||||||
Change in net unrealized gains on securities available for sale |
$ | 2,092 | $ | (625 | ) | |||
Change in future policy benefits |
(1,467 | ) | 720 | |||||
Change in policyholder account balances |
(75 | ) | 7 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other comprehensive income |
550 | 102 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
$ | 19,991 | $ | 4,893 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1.72 | $ | 0.42 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
4
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
Quarter Ended March 31, 2012 |
||||
(Unaudited) | ||||
COMMON STOCK, beginning and end of period |
$ | 23,121 | ||
|
|
|||
ADDITIONAL PAID IN CAPITAL |
||||
Beginning of period |
41,101 | |||
Excess of proceeds over cost of treasury stock sold |
5 | |||
|
|
|||
End of period |
41,106 | |||
|
|
|||
RETAINED EARNINGS |
||||
Beginning of period |
780,918 | |||
Net income |
19,441 | |||
Stockholder dividends of $0.27 per share |
(3,054 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
End of period |
797,305 | |||
|
|
|||
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE |
||||
INCOME, net of taxes |
||||
Beginning of period |
30,086 | |||
Other comprehensive income |
550 | |||
|
|
|||
End of period |
30,636 | |||
|
|
|||
TREASURY STOCK, at cost |
||||
Beginning of period |
(164,521 | ) | ||
Cost of 103 shares acquired |
(3 | ) | ||
Cost of 215 shares sold |
3 | |||
|
|
|||
End of period |
(164,521 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 727,647 | ||
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
5
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Quarter Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 19,441 | $ | 4,791 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: |
||||||||
Amortization of investment premium and discount |
995 | 939 | ||||||
Depreciation |
828 | 645 | ||||||
Acquisition costs capitalized |
(9,652 | ) | (8,743 | ) | ||||
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs |
7,901 | 9,584 | ||||||
Realized investment gains |
(15,677 | ) | (801 | ) | ||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Reinsurance receivables |
(1,329 | ) | (2,220 | ) | ||||
Future policy benefits |
(1,200 | ) | (2,962 | ) | ||||
Policyholder account balances |
(1,714 | ) | (6,381 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable and deferred |
5,976 | 1,577 | ||||||
Other, net |
(9,304 | ) | 3,992 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided (used) |
(3,735 | ) | 421 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Purchases of investments: |
||||||||
Fixed maturity securities |
(128,592 | ) | (78,118 | ) | ||||
Equity securities |
(705 | ) | (1,030 | ) | ||||
Mortgage loans |
(11,292 | ) | (15,472 | ) | ||||
Real estate |
(2,656 | ) | (2,900 | ) | ||||
Policy loans |
(3,460 | ) | (3,450 | ) | ||||
Sales of investments: |
||||||||
Fixed maturity securities |
6,250 | 10,143 | ||||||
Equity securities |
150 | 201 | ||||||
Real estate |
47,328 | - | ||||||
Net purchases of short-term investments |
(4,977 | ) | (7,517 | ) | ||||
Maturities, calls, and principal paydowns of investments: |
||||||||
Fixed maturity securities |
40,036 | 64,114 | ||||||
Mortgage loans |
38,954 | 19,864 | ||||||
Policy loans |
4,261 | 4,822 | ||||||
Net disposition (acquisition) of property and equipment |
(72 | ) | 40 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used |
(14,775 | ) | (9,303 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
6
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
Quarter Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Deposits on policyholder account balances |
$ | 61,463 | $ | 57,464 | ||||
Withdrawals from policyholder account balances |
(43,661 | ) | (47,888 | ) | ||||
Net transfers from separate accounts |
1,358 | 871 | ||||||
Change in other deposits |
(2,865 | ) | 921 | |||||
Cash dividends to stockholders |
(3,054 | ) | (3,096 | ) | ||||
Net disposition of treasury stock |
5 | 7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided |
13,246 | 8,279 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Decrease in cash |
(5,264 | ) | (603 | ) | ||||
Cash at beginning of year |
10,436 | 5,445 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash at end of period |
$ | 5,172 | $ | 4,842 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Income taxes |
3,000 | 2,000 |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
7
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Kansas City Life Insurance Company include the accounts of the consolidated entity (the Company), which primarily consists of three life insurance companies. Kansas City Life Insurance Company (Kansas City Life) is the parent company. Sunset Life Insurance Company of America (Sunset Life) and Old American Insurance Company (Old American) are wholly-owned subsidiaries.
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial reporting and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulations S-K, S-X, and other applicable regulations. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. As such, these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys 2011 Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, and all normal and recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position at March 31, 2012 and the results of operations for all periods presented have been made. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the Companys operating results for a full year. Significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation and certain immaterial reclassifications have been made to prior period results to conform with the current periods presentation.
The preparation of the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates are inherently subject to change and actual results could differ from these estimates.
Immaterial Correction of Errors
During the first quarter of 2012, the Company identified an error related to the amortization period for unrecognized actuarial gains and losses for its pension plan of $2.0 million before applicable income taxes and an after-tax impact of $1.3 million to net income and stockholders equity, which had been previously recorded during 2011. Management has evaluated this error both quantitatively and qualitatively, concluding that the error is not material to the consolidated financial statements. Please refer to Note 11 Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits for additional information.
During 2011, the Company identified errors related to the classification of amounts reported in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The Company has revised the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the period ended March 31, 2011. The changes resulted in an increase of $1.9 million to cash flows from operating activities and a decrease of the same amount to cash flows from financing activities. This change did not impact net income, the balance sheet, or stockholders equity for the period. Management has evaluated this error both quantitatively and qualitatively, concluding that this correction is not material to the consolidated financial statements.
Significant Accounting Policies
No significant updates or changes to these policies occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2012.
For a full discussion of these significant accounting policies, please refer to the Companys 2011 Form 10-K.
8
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
2. New Accounting Pronouncements
For a full discussion of new accounting pronouncements and other regulatory activity and their impact on the Company, please refer to the Companys 2011 Form 10-K.
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During 2012
In October 2010, the FASB issued guidance that modifies the types of costs incurred by insurance entities that can be capitalized when issuing or renewing insurance contracts. The guidance defines allowable deferred acquisition costs as incremental or directly related to the successful acquisition of new or renewal contracts. In addition, certain costs related directly to acquisition activities performed by the insurer, such as underwriting and policy issuance, are also deferrable. This guidance also defines the considerations for the deferral of direct-response advertising costs. This guidance became effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with either prospective or retrospective application permitted. The Company adopted this new guidance prospectively on January 1, 2012. Please refer to Note 7 Change in Accounting Principle for additional information.
In April 2011, the FASB issued new guidance concerning repurchase agreements. This guidance amends previously provided guidance as to when an entity may or may not recognize a sale upon the transfer of financial assets subject to repurchase agreements. That determination was previously based upon whether the entity has maintained effective control over the transferred financial assets. One of the relevant considerations for assessing effective control is the transferors ability to repurchase or redeem financial assets before maturity. This update removes the assessment of effective control. The update became effective for interim or annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this new guidance on January 1, 2012 with no material impact to the consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued new guidance concerning fair value measurements and disclosure. The new guidance is the result of joint efforts by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to develop a single, converged fair value framework on how to measure fair value and the necessary disclosures concerning fair value measurements. The guidance became effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this new guidance on January 1, 2012 with no material impact to the consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance regarding the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in the financial statements. This guidance removes the previous presentation options and provides that entities must report comprehensive income in either a continuous statement of comprehensive income or two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance also includes the requirement for reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income to be presented on the face of the financial statements. This guidance does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income nor does it require any disclosures in addition to those previously required. In December 2011, the FASB deferred the effective date for amendments to the presentation of reclassification adjustments. The guidance became effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this new guidance on January 1, 2012 with no material impact to the consolidated financial statements.
All other new accounting standards and updates of existing standards issued through the date of this filing were considered by management and did not relate to accounting policies and procedures pertinent to the Company at this time.
9
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
3. Investments
Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Available for Sale
Securities by Asset Class
The following table provides amortized cost and fair value of securities by asset class at March 31, 2012.
Amortized Cost |
Gross Unrealized |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||||
Gains | Losses | |||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government |
$ | 118,343 | $ | 11,886 | $ | 58 | $ | 130,171 | ||||||||
Federal agencies 1 |
22,206 | 3,075 | 1 | 25,280 | ||||||||||||
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities 1 |
103,397 | 9,756 | - | 113,153 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
243,946 | 24,717 | 59 | 268,604 | ||||||||||||
Corporate obligations: |
||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
476,199 | 41,500 | 2,312 | 515,387 | ||||||||||||
Energy |
165,977 | 19,033 | 144 | 184,866 | ||||||||||||
Communications and technology |
195,564 | 17,497 | 209 | 212,852 | ||||||||||||
Financial |
313,231 | 18,598 | 2,483 | 329,346 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
478,165 | 42,792 | 862 | 520,095 | ||||||||||||
Public utilities |
260,966 | 36,009 | 579 | 296,396 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
1,890,102 | 175,429 | 6,589 | 2,058,942 | ||||||||||||
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities |
163,020 | 2,425 | 9,238 | 156,207 | ||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
148,669 | 21,608 | 20 | 170,257 | ||||||||||||
Other |
109,840 | 3,846 | 8,768 | 104,918 | ||||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stocks |
11,735 | 337 | 223 | 11,849 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Fixed maturity securities |
2,567,312 | 228,362 | 24,897 | 2,770,777 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
35,504 | 1,890 | 149 | 37,245 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,602,816 | $ | 230,252 | $ | 25,046 | $ | 2,808,022 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. |
10
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
The following table provides amortized cost and fair value of securities by asset class at December 31, 2011.
Amortized Cost |
Gross Unrealized |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||||
Gains | Losses | |||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government |
$ | 120,593 | $ | 13,856 | $ | 12 | $ | 134,437 | ||||||||
Federal agencies 1 |
22,401 | 3,480 | - | 25,881 | ||||||||||||
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities 1 |
109,738 | 9,901 | 2 | 119,637 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
252,732 | 27,237 | 14 | 279,955 | ||||||||||||
Corporate obligations: |
||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
444,030 | 43,710 | 860 | 486,880 | ||||||||||||
Energy |
152,580 | 19,131 | - | 171,711 | ||||||||||||
Communications and technology |
184,983 | 16,566 | 156 | 201,393 | ||||||||||||
Financial |
308,813 | 15,155 | 5,890 | 318,078 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
452,962 | 43,788 | 263 | 496,487 | ||||||||||||
Public utilities |
259,609 | 38,094 | 1,366 | 296,337 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
1,802,977 | 176,444 | 8,535 | 1,970,886 | ||||||||||||
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities |
167,666 | 1,856 | 12,620 | 156,902 | ||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
150,267 | 18,316 | 61 | 168,522 | ||||||||||||
Other |
100,315 | 3,576 | 9,235 | 94,656 | ||||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stocks |
11,735 | 226 | 740 | 11,221 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Fixed maturity securities |
2,485,692 | 227,655 | 31,205 | 2,682,142 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
34,951 | 1,873 | 135 | 36,689 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,520,643 | $ | 229,528 | $ | 31,340 | $ | 2,718,831 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. |
Contractual Maturities
The following table provides the distribution of maturities for fixed maturity securities available for sale at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Expected maturities may differ from these contractual maturities since borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 99,799 | $ | 101,794 | $ | 79,651 | $ | 81,212 | ||||||||
Due after one year through five years |
582,944 | 626,986 | 599,904 | 639,706 | ||||||||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
1,039,768 | 1,140,637 | 946,752 | 1,045,645 | ||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
484,594 | 528,887 | 486,126 | 532,927 | ||||||||||||
Securities with variable principal payments |
348,472 | 360,624 | 361,524 | 371,431 | ||||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stocks |
11,735 | 11,849 | 11,735 | 11,221 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 2,567,312 | $ | 2,770,777 | $ | 2,485,692 | $ | 2,682,142 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses on Investments
The Company reviews all security investments, with particular attention given to those having unrealized losses. Further, the Company specifically assesses all investments with greater than 10% declines in fair value below amortized cost and, in general, monitors all security investments as to ongoing risk. These risks are fundamentally evaluated through both a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the issuer. The Company also prepares a formal review document no less often than quarterly of all investments where fair value is less than 80% of amortized cost for six months or more and selected investments that have changed significantly from a previous period and that have a decline in fair value greater than 10% of amortized cost.
11
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
The Company has a policy and process in place to identify securities that could potentially have an impairment that is other-than-temporary (OTTI). This process involves monitoring market events and other items that could impact issuers. The Company considers relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating whether the impairment of a security is other-than-temporary. Relevant facts and circumstances considered are described in the Valuation of Investments section of Note 1 Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies of the Companys 2011 Form 10-K.
To the extent the Company determines that a fixed maturity security is deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, the portion of the impairment that is deemed to be due to credit is charged to the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and the cost basis of the underlying investment is reduced. The portion of such impairment that is determined to be non-credit-related is deducted from net realized loss in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and is reflected in other comprehensive income and accumulated other comprehensive income.
There are a number of significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the process of monitoring impairments, determining if an impairment is other-than-temporary and determining the portion of an other-than-temporary impairment that is due to credit. These risks and uncertainties are described in the Valuation of Investments section of Note 1 of the Companys 2011 Form 10-K.
Once a security is determined to have met certain of the criteria for consideration as being other-than-temporarily impaired, further information is gathered and evaluated pertaining to the particular security. If the security is an unsecured obligation, the additional research is a top-down approach with particular emphasis on the likelihood of the issuer to meet the contractual terms of the obligation. If the security is secured by an asset or guaranteed by another party, the value of the underlying secured asset or the financial ability of the third-party guarantor is evaluated as a secondary source of repayment. Such research is based upon a top-down approach, narrowing to the specific estimates of value and cash flow of the underlying secured asset or guarantor. If the security is a collateralized obligation, such as a mortgage-backed or other asset-backed instrument, research is also conducted to obtain and analyze the performance of the collateral relative to expectations at the time of acquisition and with regard to projections for the future. Such analyses are based upon historical results, trends, comparisons to collateral performance of similar securities, and analyses performed by third parties. This information is used to develop projected cash flows that are compared to the amortized cost of the security.
If a determination is made that an unsecured security, secured security, or security with a guaranty of payment by a third-party is other-than-temporarily impaired, an estimate is developed of the portion of such impairment that is due to credit. The estimate of the portion of impairment due to credit is based upon a comparison of ratings and maturity horizon for the security and relative historical default probabilities from one or more nationally recognized rating organizations. When appropriate for any given security, sector or period in the business cycle, the historical default probability is adjusted to reflect periods or situations of distress by adding to the default probability increments of standard deviations from mean historical results. The credit impairment analysis is supplemented by estimates of potential recovery values for the specific security, including the potential impact of the value of any secured assets, in the event of default. This information is used to determine the Companys best estimate, derived from probability-weighted cash flows.
The evaluation of loan-backed and similar asset-backed securities, particularly including residential mortgage-backed securities, with significant indications of potential other-than-temporary impairment requires considerable use of estimates and judgment. Specifically, the Company performs discounted cash flow projections on these securities to evaluate whether the value of the investment is expected to be fully realized. Projections of expected future cash flows are based upon considerations of the performance of the actual underlying assets, including historical delinquencies, defaults, severity of losses incurred, and prepayments, along with the Companys estimates of future results for these factors. The Companys estimates of future results are based upon actual historical performance of the underlying assets relative to historical, current and expected general economic conditions, specific conditions related to the underlying assets, industry data, and other factors that are believed to be relevant. If the present value of the projected expected future cash flows is determined to be below the Companys carrying value, the Company recognizes an other-than-temporary impairment on the portion of the carrying value that exceeds the projected expected future cash flows. To the extent that the loan-backed or other asset-backed securities were high quality investments at the time of acquisition, and they remain high quality investments and do not otherwise demonstrate characteristics of impairment, the Company performs other initial evaluations to determine whether other-than-temporary cash flow evaluations need to be performed.
12
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
The discounted future cash flow calculation typically becomes the primary determinant of whether any portion and to what extent an unrealized loss is due to credit on loan-backed and similar asset-backed securities with significant indications of potential other-than-temporary impairment. Such indications typically include below investment grade ratings and significant unrealized losses for an extended period of time, among other factors. The Company identified 17 non-U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities that had such indications at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Discounted future cash flow analysis was performed for each of these securities to determine if any portion of the impairment was due to credit and deemed to be other-than-temporary. The discount rate used in calculating the present value of future cash flows was the investment yield at the time of purchase for each security. The initial default rates were assumed to remain constant over a 24-month time frame and grade down thereafter, reflecting the general perspective of a more stabilized residential housing environment in the future.
For loan-backed and similar asset-backed securities, the determination of any amount of impairment that is due to credit is based upon the present value of projected future cash flows being less than the amortized cost of the security. This amount is recognized as a realized loss in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and the carrying value of the security is written down by the same amount. The portion of an impairment that is determined not to be due to credit is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
As part of the required accounting for unrealized gains and losses, the Company also adjusts the deferred acquisition costs (DAC) and value of business acquired (VOBA) assets to recognize the adjustment to those assets as if the unrealized gains and losses from securities classified as available for sale actually had been realized.
The following table provides information regarding fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale with unrealized losses by length of time at March 31, 2012.
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
|||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government |
$ | 3,798 | $ | 47 | $ | 907 | $ | 11 | $ | 4,705 | $ | 58 | ||||||||||||
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities 1 |
- | - | 294 | 1 | 294 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Subtotal |
3,798 | 47 | 1,201 | 12 | 4,999 | 59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
33,204 | 2,312 | - | - | 33,204 | 2,312 | ||||||||||||||||||
Energy |
10,594 | 144 | - | - | 10,594 | 144 | ||||||||||||||||||
Communications and technology |
13,048 | 209 | - | - | 13,048 | 209 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial |
18,230 | 183 | 17,873 | 2,300 | 36,103 | 2,483 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
49,311 | 665 | 4,537 | 197 | 53,848 | 862 | ||||||||||||||||||
Public utilities |
7,169 | 327 | 11,924 | 252 | 19,093 | 579 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Subtotal |
131,556 | 3,840 | 34,334 | 2,749 | 165,890 | 6,589 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities |
12,866 | 1,779 | 59,115 | 7,459 | 71,981 | 9,238 | ||||||||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
- | - | 882 | 20 | 882 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
3,125 | 1,054 | 45,671 | 7,714 | 48,796 | 8,768 | ||||||||||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stocks |
622 | 3 | 3,461 | 220 | 4,083 | 223 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities |
151,967 | 6,723 | 144,664 | 18,174 | 296,631 | 24,897 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Equity securities |
67 | 106 | 1,041 | 43 | 1,108 | 149 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 152,034 | $ | 6,829 | $ | 145,705 | $ | 18,217 | $ | 297,739 | $ | 25,046 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. |
13
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
The following table provides information regarding fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale with unrealized losses by length of time at December 31, 2011.
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
|||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government |
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 959 | $ | 12 | $ | 959 | $ | 12 | ||||||||||||
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities 1 |
649 | - | 294 | 2 | 943 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Subtotal |
649 | - | 1,253 | 14 | 1,902 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
25,455 | 860 | - | - | 25,455 | 860 | ||||||||||||||||||
Communications and technology |
7,239 | 156 | - | - | 7,239 | 156 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial |
51,273 | 2,107 | 16,402 | 3,783 | 67,675 | 5,890 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
11,765 | 119 | 3,689 | 144 | 15,454 | 263 | ||||||||||||||||||
Public utilities |
4,710 | 344 | 11,152 | 1,022 | 15,862 | 1,366 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Subtotal |
100,442 | 3,586 | 31,243 | 4,949 | 131,685 | 8,535 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities |
41,734 | 2,668 | 61,864 | 9,952 | 103,598 | 12,620 | ||||||||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
- | - | 3,909 | 61 | 3,909 | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
9,257 | 921 | 47,146 | 8,314 | 56,403 | 9,235 | ||||||||||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stocks |
2,939 | 115 | 3,056 | 625 | 5,995 | 740 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities |
155,021 | 7,290 | 148,471 | 23,915 | 303,492 | 31,205 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Equity securities |
69 | 104 | 1,054 | 31 | 1,123 | 135 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 155,090 | $ | 7,394 | $ | 149,525 | $ | 23,946 | $ | 304,615 | $ | 31,340 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. |
In addition, the Company also considers as part of its monitoring and evaluation process the length of time the fair value of a security is below amortized cost. At March 31, 2012, the Company had 82 issues in its investment portfolio of fixed maturity and equity securities with unrealized losses. Included in this total, 46 security issues were below cost for less than one year; 7 security issues were below cost for one year or more and less than three years; and 29 security issues were below cost for three years or more. At December 31, 2011 the Company had 85 issues in its investment portfolio of fixed maturity and equity securities with unrealized losses. Included in this total, 46 security issues were below cost for less than one year; 10 security issues were below cost for one year or more and less than three years; and 29 security issues were below cost for three years or more.
14
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
The following table provides the distribution of maturities for fixed maturity securities available for sale with unrealized losses at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Expected maturities may differ from these contractual maturities since borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Fair Value |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|||||||||||||
Fixed maturity security securities available for sale: |
||||||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 935 | $ | 20 | $ | 2,953 | $ | 48 | ||||||||
Due after one year through five years |
18,682 | 392 | 42,416 | 2,120 | ||||||||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
117,755 | 3,983 | 64,772 | 2,616 | ||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
82,899 | 11,038 | 82,816 | 13,060 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
220,271 | 15,433 | 192,957 | 17,844 | ||||||||||||
Securities with variable principal payments |
72,277 | 9,241 | 104,540 | 12,621 | ||||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stocks |
4,083 | 223 | 5,995 | 740 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 296,631 | $ | 24,897 | $ | 303,492 | $ | 31,205 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of credit losses recognized in earnings on fixed maturity securities held by the Company for which a portion of the other-than-temporary loss was recognized in other comprehensive income for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.
Credit losses on securities held at beginning of year in accumulated other comprehensive income |
$ | 13,559 | ||
Additions for credit losses not previously recognized in other-than-temporary impairment |
28 | |||
Additions for increases in the credit loss for which an other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized when there was no intent to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis |
132 | |||
Reductions for securities sold during the period (realized) |
- | |||
Reductions for securities previously recognized in other comprehensive income because of intent to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis |
- | |||
Reductions for increases in cash flows expected to be collected that are recognized over the remaining life of the security |
(4 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Credit losses on securities held at the end of year in accumulated other comprehensive income |
$ | 13,715 | ||
|
|
15
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
Realized Gains (Losses)
The following table provides detail concerning realized investment gains and losses for the first quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
Quarter Ended March 31 |
||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Gross gains resulting from: |
||||||||
Sales of investment securities |
$ | 313 | $ | 311 | ||||
Investment securities called and other |
208 | 863 | ||||||
Sales of real estate |
15,170 | - | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total gross gains |
15,691 | 1,174 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gross losses resulting from: |
||||||||
Investment securities called and other |
(53 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||
Mortgage loans |
(165 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total gross losses |
(218 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||
Change in allowance for potential future losses on mortgage loans |
364 | - | ||||||
Amortization of DAC and VOBA |
- | (105 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net realized investment gains, exluding impairment losses |
15,837 | 1,012 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings: |
||||||||
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses |
(268 | ) | (269 | ) | ||||
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income |
108 | 58 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
(160 | ) | (211 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net realized investment gains |
$ | 15,677 | $ | 801 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Proceeds From Sales of Investment Securities
The table below provides information regarding sales of fixed maturity and equity securities, excluding maturities and calls, for the quarters ended March 31.
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Proceeds |
$ | 6,400 | $ | 10,143 | ||||
Gross realized gains |
313 | 311 | ||||||
Gross realized losses |
- | - |
Mortgage Loans
The Company invests on an ongoing basis in commercial mortgage loans that are secured by real estate. The Company had 16% of its invested assets in commercial mortgage loans at March 31, 2012, compared to 17% at December 31, 2011. In addition to the subject collateral underlying the mortgage, the Company typically requires some amount of recourse from borrowers as another potential source of repayment. The recourse requirement is determined as part of the underwriting requirements of each loan. The average loan to value ratio for the overall portfolio was 45% and 46% at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and is based upon the appraisal of value at the time the loan was originated or acquired.
16
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
The following table summarizes the amount of mortgage loans held by the Company at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, segregated by year of origination. Purchased loans are shown in the year acquired by the Company, although the individual loans may have been initially originated in prior years.
March 31 2012 |
% of Total |
December 31 2011 |
% of Total |
|||||||||||||
Prior to 2002 |
$ | 24,382 | 4% | $ | 28,437 | 5% | ||||||||||
2003 |
39,632 | 7% | 42,112 | 7% | ||||||||||||
2004 |
29,460 | 5% | 29,966 | 5% | ||||||||||||
2005 |
53,229 | 9% | 54,802 | 9% | ||||||||||||
2006 |
41,420 | 7% | 42,676 | 7% | ||||||||||||
2007 |
34,964 | 6% | 35,323 | 6% | ||||||||||||
2008 |
38,940 | 7% | 44,285 | 7% | ||||||||||||
2009 |
48,872 | 8% | 50,574 | 8% | ||||||||||||
2010 |
108,278 | 19% | 133,684 | 22% | ||||||||||||
2011 |
141,592 | 25% | 142,913 | 24% | ||||||||||||
2012 |
15,418 | 3% | - | - | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
576,187 | 100% | 604,772 | 100% | |||||||||||||
Allowance for potential future losses |
(2,485 | ) | (2,849 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 573,702 | $ | 601,923 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
The following table identifies mortgage loans by geographic location at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
March 31 2012 |
% of Total |
December 31 2011 |
% of Total |
|||||||||||||
Pacific |
$ | 135,033 | 23% | $ | 138,529 | 23% | ||||||||||
West north central |
106,635 | 19% | 130,481 | 22% | ||||||||||||
West south central |
100,445 | 17% | 98,036 | 16% | ||||||||||||
Mountain |
81,144 | 14% | 82,029 | 14% | ||||||||||||
South atlantic |
61,567 | 11% | 63,125 | 10% | ||||||||||||
Middle atlantic |
41,851 | 7% | 42,112 | 7% | ||||||||||||
East north central |
30,682 | 5% | 30,482 | 5% | ||||||||||||
East south central |
18,830 | 4% | 19,978 | 3% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
576,187 | 100% | 604,772 | 100% | |||||||||||||
Allowance for potential future losses |
(2,485 | ) | (2,849 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 573,702 | $ | 601,923 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
The following table identifies mortgage loans by property type at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The Other category consists of apartments and retail properties.
March 31 2012 |
% Total |
December 31 2011 |
% Total |
|||||||||||||
Industrial |
$ | 242,222 | 42% | $ | 251,839 | 42% | ||||||||||
Office |
236,417 | 41% | 243,885 | 40% | ||||||||||||
Medical |
42,572 | 7% | 43,089 | 7% | ||||||||||||
Other |
54,976 | 10% | 65,959 | 11% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
576,187 | 100% | 604,772 | 100% | |||||||||||||
Allowance for potential future losses |
(2,485 | ) | (2,849 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 573,702 | $ | 601,923 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
17
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
The following table identifies the concentration of mortgage loans by state greater than 5% at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
March 31 2012 |
% of Total |
December 31 2011 |
% of Total |
|||||||||||||
California |
$ | 115,233 | 20% | $ | 117,261 | 19% | ||||||||||
Texas |
87,289 | 15% | 84,724 | 14% | ||||||||||||
Minnesota |
63,932 | 11% | 64,952 | 11% | ||||||||||||
Florida |
35,093 | 6% | 31,310 | 5% | ||||||||||||
All others |
274,640 | 48% | 306,525 | 51% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
576,187 | 100% | 604,772 | 100% | |||||||||||||
Allowance for potential future losses |
(2,485 | ) | (2,849 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 573,702 | $ | 601,923 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
The table below identifies the carrying amount of mortgage loans by maturity at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
March 31 2012 |
% of Total |
December 31 2011 |
% of Total |
|||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 6,188 | 1% | $ | 2,356 | - | ||||||||||
Due after one year through five years |
191,385 | 33% | 153,822 | 25% | ||||||||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
239,835 | 42% | 255,615 | 42% | ||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
138,779 | 24% | 192,979 | 33% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
576,187 | 100% | 604,772 | 100% | |||||||||||||
Allowance for potential future losses |
(2,485 | ) | (2,849 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 573,702 | $ | 601,923 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
The Company may refinance commercial mortgage loans prior to contractual maturity as a means of originating new loans that meet the Companys underwriting and pricing parameters. The Company refinanced loans with outstanding balances of $4.7 million and $7.8 million during the first quarters of 2012 and 2011, respectively.
In the normal course of business, the Company commits to fund commercial mortgage loans generally up to 120 days in advance. These commitments generally have fixed expiration dates. A small percentage of commitments expire due to the borrowers failure to deliver the requirements of the commitment by the expiration date. In these cases, the Company retains the commitment fee. For additional information, please see Note 16-Commitments.
At March 31, 2012, the Company had a construction-to-permanent loan in the amount of $2.8 million, of which $2.5 million had been disbursed. At completion and fulfillment of occupancy requirements, the construction loan will convert to long-term, fixed rate permanent loans.
4. Fair Value Measurements
Under U.S. GAAP, fair value represents the price that would be received to sell an asset (exit price) or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It is the Companys policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements.
Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value and for estimating fair value for financial instruments not recorded at fair value but for which fair value is disclosed.
Assets
Securities Available for Sale
Fixed maturity and equity securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon unadjusted quoted prices, if available, except as described in the subsequent paragraphs.
18
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
Short-Term Financial Assets
Short-term financial assets include cash and other short-term assets. Other short-term assets are invested in institutional money market funds. These assets are categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as the valuation is based upon the net asset value (NAV) of the fund.
Loans
The Company does not record loans at fair value. As such, valuation techniques discussed herein for loans are primarily for estimating fair value for purpose of disclosure.
Fair values of mortgage loans on real estate properties are calculated by discounting contractual cash flows, using discount rates based on current industry pricing or the Companys estimate of an appropriate risk-adjusted discount rate for loans of similar size, type, remaining maturity, likelihood of prepayment, and repricing characteristics. Mortgage loans are categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
The Company also has loans made to policyholders. These loans cannot exceed the cash surrender value of the policy. Carrying value of policy loans approximates fair value. Policy loans are categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Separate Accounts
The separate account assets and liabilities, which are equal, are recorded at fair value based upon NAV. They are categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy, as the Company receives independent prices from external pricing sources to determine the fair value.
Liabilities
Investment-Type Liabilities Included in Policyholder Account Balances and Other Policyholder Funds
Fair values for liabilities under investment-type insurance contracts are based upon account value. The fair values of investment-type insurance contracts included with policyholder account balances for fixed deferred annuities are estimated to be their cash surrender values. The fair values of supplementary contracts without life contingencies are estimated to be the present value of payments using a market yield. The fair values of deposits with no stated maturity are estimated to be the amount payable on demand at the measurement date. These liabilities are categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefits (GMWB)
The Company offers a GMWB rider that can be added to new or existing variable annuity contracts. The rider provides an enhanced withdrawal benefit that guarantees a stream of income payments to an owner or annuitant, regardless of the contract account value. Fair value for GMWB rider contracts is a Level 3 valuation, as it is based on models which utilize significant unobservable inputs. These models require actuarial and financial market assumptions, which reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the contract, including adjustments for volatility, risk, and issuer non-performance.
Notes Payable
Fair values for short-term notes payable approximate carrying value. The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of the fair value because of the relatively short time between the origination of the loan and its expected repayment.
Determination of Fair Value
The determination of the fair value of the Companys fixed maturity and equity securities is the responsibility of the Companys investment accounting group, which reports to the Principal Accounting Officer. This group manages and creates the policies and processes used to determine the fair value for these assets. This group employs third-party pricing services and obtains selected support from the Companys portfolio managers in order to achieve results for this multi-tiered process. All prices are reviewed by the investment accounting group. The financial reporting group, the Principal Accounting Officer, and the Chief Financial Officer also review the fair value methodologies and the fair values that are obtained each quarter. The results of those reviews are made known to the Companys internal Disclosure Committee and to the Companys Audit Committee. In addition, any significant policy or process changes made during the quarter are also discussed with the Companys Audit Committee.
The Company utilizes external independent third-party pricing services to determine the majority of its fair values on investment securities available for sale. At March 31, 2012, 96% of the carrying value of these investments was from external pricing services, 1% was from brokers, and 3% was derived from internal matrices and calculations. In the event that the primary pricing service does not provide a price, the Company utilizes the price provided by a second pricing service. The Company reviews prices received from service providers for unusual fluctuations but generally accepts the price identified from the primary pricing service. In the event that a price is not available from either third-party pricing service,
19
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
the Company pursues external pricing from brokers. Generally, the Company pursues and utilizes only one broker quote per security. In doing so, the Company solicits only brokers which have previously demonstrated knowledge and experience of the subject security. If a broker price is not available, the Company determines a fair value through various valuation techniques that may include discounted cash flows, spread-based models or similar techniques, depending upon the specific security to be priced. These techniques are primarily applied to private placement securities. The Company utilizes available market information, wherever possible, to identify inputs into the fair value determination, primarily including prices and spreads on comparable securities. In total, the Company internally determined the prices for 18 securities at March 31, 2012. These securities totaled 3% of the fair value of the Companys investment portfolio.
Each quarter, the Company performs an analysis on the prices received from third-party security pricing services and independent brokers to assess that the prices represent a reasonable estimate of the fair value. The Company corroborates and validates the primary pricing sources through a variety of procedures that include but are not limited to comparison to additional independent third-party pricing services or brokers, where possible; a review of third-party pricing service methodologies; back testing; and comparison of prices to actual trades for specific securities where observable data exists. In addition, the Company analyzes the primary third-party pricing services methodologies and related inputs and also evaluates the various types of securities in its investment portfolio to determine an appropriate fair value hierarchy.
Fair value measurements for assets and liabilities where there exists limited or no observable market data are calculated using the Companys own estimates and are categorized as Level 3. These estimates are based on current interest rates, credit spreads, liquidity premium or discount, the economic and competitive environment, unique characteristics of the asset or liability, and other pertinent factors. Therefore, these estimates cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability. Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in any valuation technique. Further, changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results of current or future values.
The Companys own estimates of fair value of fixed maturity and equity securities are derived in a number of ways, including but not limited to: 1) pricing provided by brokers, where the price indicates reliability as to value; 2) fair values of comparable securities, incorporating a spread adjustment for maturity differences, collateralization, credit quality, liquidity, and other items, if applicable; 3) discounted cash flow models and margin spreads; 4) bond yield curves; 5) observable market prices and exchange transaction information not provided by external pricing services; and 6) statement values provided to the Company by fund managers.
The determination of the value of the Companys liabilities that are reported at fair value in the financial statements is the responsibility of the Companys valuation actuary group, which reports to the Companys Senior Vice President and Actuary. This group manages and creates the policies and processes used to determine the fair value for these liabilities. This methodology uses internal assumptions and directed third-party inputs to derive a value including a risk-neutral option pricing model that incorporates a third-party-developed index that is consistent with the attributes of the product and provides for an approximate match of the volatility measure with the expected life of the underlying contracts. The fair value methodologies and the fair values are reviewed by the Senior Vice President and Actuary, the Principal Accounting Officer, and the Chief Financial Officer. The results of those reviews are made known to the Companys internal Disclosure Committee and to the Companys Audit Committee. In addition, any significant policy or process changes made during the quarter are also discussed with the Companys Audit Committee.
Fair Values Hierarchy
The Company categorizes its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the inputs and assumptions used to determine the fair value. These levels are as follows:
Level 1 Valuations are based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2 Valuations are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. Valuations are obtained from third-party pricing services or inputs that are observable or derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Valuations are generated from techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Companys assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include the use of discounted cash flow models, spread-based models, and similar techniques, using the best information available in the circumstances.
20
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
Categories Reported at Fair Value
The following tables present categories reported at fair value on a recurring basis.
March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Assets: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government |
$ | 12,781 | $ | 114,005 | $ | 3,385 | $ | 130,171 | ||||||||
Federal agencies 1 |
- | 25,280 | - | 25,280 | ||||||||||||
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities 1 |
- | 113,153 | - | 113,153 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
12,781 | 252,438 | 3,385 | 268,604 | ||||||||||||
Corporate obligations: |
||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
- | 512,936 | 2,451 | 515,387 | ||||||||||||
Energy |
- | 182,475 | 2,391 | 184,866 | ||||||||||||
Communications and technology |
- | 212,852 | - | 212,852 | ||||||||||||
Financial |
- | 317,554 | 11,792 | 329,346 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
- | 498,831 | 21,264 | 520,095 | ||||||||||||
Public utilities |
- | 296,396 | - | 296,396 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
- | 2,021,044 | 37,898 | 2,058,942 | ||||||||||||
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities |
- | 156,207 | - | 156,207 | ||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
- | 165,888 | 4,369 | 170,257 | ||||||||||||
Other |
- | 104,918 | - | 104,918 | ||||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stocks |
11,849 | - | - | 11,849 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Fixed maturity securities |
24,630 | 2,700,495 | 45,652 | 2,770,777 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Equity securities |
2,297 | 33,855 | 1,093 | 37,245 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 26,927 | $ | 2,734,350 | $ | 46,745 | $ | 2,808,022 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Percent of total |
1% | 97% | 2% | 100% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Other policyholder funds |
||||||||||||||||
GMWB |
$ | - | $ | - | $ | (950 | ) | $ | (950 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | - | $ | - | $ | (950 | ) | $ | (950 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. |
21
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government |
$ | 12,876 | $ | 118,130 | $ | 3,431 | $ | 134,437 | ||||||||
Federal agencies 1 |
- | 25,881 | - | 25,881 | ||||||||||||
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities 1 |
- | 119,637 | - | 119,637 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
12,876 | 263,648 | 3,431 | 279,955 | ||||||||||||
Corporate obligations: |
||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
- | 486,380 | 500 | 486,880 | ||||||||||||
Energy |
- | 169,342 | 2,369 | 171,711 | ||||||||||||
Communications and technology |
- | 201,393 | - | 201,393 | ||||||||||||
Financial |
- | 307,464 | 10,614 | 318,078 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
- | 474,553 | 21,934 | 496,487 | ||||||||||||
Public utilities |
- | 296,337 | - | 296,337 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
- | 1,935,469 | 35,417 | 1,970,886 | ||||||||||||
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities |
- | 156,902 | - | 156,902 | ||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
- | 163,611 | 4,911 | 168,522 | ||||||||||||
Other |
- | 94,656 | - | 94,656 | ||||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stocks |
11,221 | - | - | 11,221 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Fixed maturity securities |
24,097 | 2,614,286 | 43,759 | 2,682,142 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Equity securities |
2,216 | 33,350 | 1,123 | 36,689 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 26,313 | $ | 2,647,636 | $ | 44,882 | $ | 2,718,831 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Percent of total |
1% | 97% | 2% | 100% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Other policyholder funds |
||||||||||||||||
GMWB |
$ | - | $ | - | $ | (187 | ) | $ | (187 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | - | $ | - | $ | (187 | ) | $ | (187 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. |
22
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
The following tables present the fair value of fixed maturity and equity securities available for sale by pricing source and fair value hierarchy level.
March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities available for sale: |
||||||||||||||||
Priced from external pricing services |
$ | 24,630 | $ | 2,662,120 | $ | - | $ | 2,686,750 | ||||||||
Priced from independent broker quotations |
- | 38,375 | - | 38,375 | ||||||||||||
Priced from internal matrices and calculations |
- | - | 45,652 | 45,652 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
24,630 | 2,700,495 | 45,652 | 2,770,777 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Equity securities available for sale: |
||||||||||||||||
Priced from external pricing services |
2,297 | 7,245 | - | 9,542 | ||||||||||||
Priced from independent broker quotations |
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Priced from internal matrices and calculations |
- | 26,610 | 1,093 | 27,703 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
2,297 | 33,855 | 1,093 | 37,245 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 26,927 | $ | 2,734,350 | $ | 46,745 | $ | 2,808,022 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Percent of total |
1% | 97% | 2% | 100% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities available for sale: |
||||||||||||||||
Priced from external pricing services |
$ | 24,097 | $ | 2,582,617 | $ | - | $ | 2,606,714 | ||||||||
Priced from independent broker quotations |
- | 31,669 | - | 31,669 | ||||||||||||
Priced from internal matrices and calculations |
- | - | 43,759 | 43,759 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
24,097 | 2,614,286 | 43,759 | 2,682,142 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Equity securities available for sale: |
||||||||||||||||
Priced from external pricing services |
2,216 | 7,444 | - | 9,660 | ||||||||||||
Priced from independent broker quotations |
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Priced from internal matrices and calculations |
- | 25,906 | 1,123 | 27,029 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
2,216 | 33,350 | 1,123 | 36,689 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 26,313 | $ | 2,647,636 | $ | 44,882 | $ | 2,718,831 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Percent of total |
1% | 97% | 2% | 100% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the first quarter ended March 31, 2012 and year ended December 31, 2011 are summarized below:
Quarter Ended March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities available for sale |
Equity securities available for sale |
Total | GMWB | |||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 43,759 | $ | 1,123 | $ | 44,882 | $ | (187 | ) | |||||||
Included in earnings |
4 | - | 4 | (688 | ) | |||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
(299 | ) | (30 | ) | (329 | ) | - | |||||||||
Purchases, issuances, sales and other dispositions: |
||||||||||||||||
Purchases |
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Issuances |
- | - | - | 55 | ||||||||||||
Sales |
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Other dispositions |
(1,626 | ) | - | (1,626 | ) | (130 | ) | |||||||||
Transfers into Level 3 |
3,814 | - | 3,814 | - | ||||||||||||
Transfers out of Level 3 |
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 45,652 | $ | 1,093 | $ | 46,745 | $ | (950 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net unrealized losses |
$ | (299 | ) | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (329 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities available for sale |
Equity securities available for sale |
Total | GMWB | |||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 55,801 | $ | 1,180 | $ | 56,981 | $ | (2,799 | ) | |||||||
Included in earnings |
11 | 92 | 103 | 2,500 | ||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
1,385 | 51 | 1,436 | - | ||||||||||||
Purchases, issuances, sales and other dispositions: |
||||||||||||||||
Purchases |
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Issuances |
- | - | - | 163 | ||||||||||||
Sales |
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Other dispositions |
(2,977 | ) | (200 | ) | (3,177 | ) | (51 | ) | ||||||||
Transfers into Level 3 |
8,640 | - | 8,640 | - | ||||||||||||
Transfers out of Level 3 |
(19,101 | ) | - | (19,101 | ) | - | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 43,759 | $ | 1,123 | $ | 44,882 | $ | (187 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net unrealized gains |
$ | 1,401 | $ | 105 | $ | 1,506 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company did not exclude any realized or unrealized gains or losses on items transferred into Level 3. Depending upon the availability of Level 1 or Level 2 pricing, specific securities may transfer into or out of Level 3. The Company did not have any transfers between Level 1 or Level 2 during the quarter ended March 31, 2012.
24
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements as of March 31, 2012.
Fair Value |
Valuation Technique |
Unobservable Inputs |
Range | Weighted Average |
||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities |
$ | 45,652 | Market comparable | Spread adjustment | 46-376 | 180 |
The Companys primary category of Level 3 fair values is fixed maturity securities, totaling $45.7 million as of March 31, 2012. These assets are valued using comparable security valuations through the unobservable input of estimated discount spreads. Specifically, the Company reviews the values and discount spreads on similar securities for which such information is observable in the market. Estimates of increased discount spreads are then determined based upon the characteristics of the securities being evaluated. The Company estimates that an increased spread of 10 basis points on each of the Level 3 securities would reduce the reported fair value by $0.2 million, as of March 31, 2012.
Other assets and liabilities categorized as Level 3 for purposes of fair value determination are not material to the Companys financial statements, and the sensitivities of such valuations to unobservable inputs are also believed to not be material.
The table below is a summary of fair value estimates at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 for financial instruments. The Company has not included assets and liabilities that are not financial instruments in this disclosure. The total of the fair value calculations presented do not represent, and should not be construed to represent, the underlying value of the Company.
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying Value |
Fair Value |
Carrying Value |
Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities available for sale |
$ | 2,770,777 | $ | 2,770,777 | $ | 2,682,142 | $ | 2,682,142 | ||||||||
Equity securities available for sale |
37,245 | 37,245 | 36,689 | 36,689 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage loans |
573,702 | 615,458 | 601,923 | 642,905 | ||||||||||||
Policy loans |
79,574 | 79,574 | 80,375 | 80,375 | ||||||||||||
Cash and short-term investments |
59,465 | 59,465 | 59,752 | 59,752 | ||||||||||||
Separate account assets |
341,250 | 341,250 | 316,609 | 316,609 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Individual and group annuities |
1,101,097 | 1,079,562 | 1,082,324 | 1,062,407 | ||||||||||||
Supplementary contracts without life contingencies |
55,488 | 54,216 | 56,193 | 54,824 | ||||||||||||
Separate account liabilities |
341,250 | 341,250 | 316,609 | 316,609 | ||||||||||||
Other policyholder funds - GMWB |
(950 | ) | (950 | ) | (187 | ) | (187 | ) |
5. Financing Receivables
The Company has financing receivables that have both a specific maturity date, either on demand or on a fixed or determinable date, and are recognized as an asset in the Companys balance sheet.
The table below identifies the Companys financing receivables by classification at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
March 31 2012 |
December 31 2011 |
|||||||
Receivables: |
||||||||
Agent receivables, net (allowance $2,232; $2,2262011) |
$ | 1,524 | $ | 1,708 | ||||
Investment-related financing receivables: |
||||||||
Mortgage loans, net (allowance $2,485; $2,8492011) |
573,702 | 601,923 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total financing receivables |
$ | 575,226 | $ | 603,631 | ||||
|
|
|
|
25
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
Agent Receivables
The Company has agent receivables which are classified as financing receivables and which are reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts. These trade receivables from agents are long-term in nature and are specifically assessed as to the collectability of each receivable. The Companys gross agent receivables totaled $3.7 million at March 31, 2012 and the Company maintained an allowance for doubtful accounts totaling $2.2 million. Gross agent receivables totaled $3.9 million with an allowance for doubtful accounts of $2.2 million at December 31, 2011. The Company identified additions to the allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2012, the result of expected defaults on selected agent receivables. Also, the allowance was reduced $0.1 million during the first quarter of 2012, largely due to write-offs of defaulted agent receivables and collections of agent receivables. The Company has two types of agent receivables included in this category as follows:
| Agent specific loans. At March 31, 2012, these loans totaled $1.0 million with an allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.2 million. At December 31, 2011, agent specific loans totaled $0.8 million with an allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.2 million. |
| Various agent commission advances and other commission receivables. Gross agent receivables in this category totaled $2.7 million, with an allowance for doubtful accounts of $2.0 million at March 31, 2012. Gross agent receivables totaled $3.1 million and the allowance for doubtful accounts was $2.0 million at December 31, 2011. |
Mortgage Loans
The Company considers its mortgage loan portfolio to be long-term financing receivables. Mortgage loans are stated at cost, net of allowance for potential future losses. Mortgage loan interest income is recognized on an accrual basis with any premium or discount amortized over the life of the loan. Prepayment and late fees are recorded on the date of collection. Loans in foreclosure, loans considered impaired or loans past due 90 days or more are placed on a non-accrual status.
If a mortgage loan is determined to be on non-accrual status, the Company does not accrue interest income. The loan is independently monitored and evaluated as to potential impairment or foreclosure. This evaluation includes assessing the probability of receiving future cash flows, along with consideration of many of the factors described below. If delinquent payments are made and the loan is brought current, then the Company returns the loan to active status and accrues income accordingly.
Generally, the Company considers its mortgage loans to be a portfolio segment. The Company considers its primary class to be property type. The Company primarily uses loan-to-value as its credit risk quality indicator but also monitors additional secondary risk factors, such as geographic distribution both on a regional and specific state basis. The mortgage loan portfolio segment is presented by property-type in a table in Note 3Investments. In addition, geographic distributions for both regional and significant state concentrations are also presented in Note 3. These measures are also supplemented with various other analytics to provide additional information concerning mortgage loans and managements assessment of financing receivables.
26
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
The following table presents an aging schedule for delinquent payments for both principal and interest at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, by property type.
Amount of Payments Past Due | ||||||||||||||||||||
Book Value | 30-59 Days | 60-89 Days | > 90 Days | Total | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Medical |
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Office |
184 | 9 | - | - | 9 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 184 | $ | 9 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 9 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Office |
816 | 13 | - | - | 13 | |||||||||||||||
Medical |
7,019 | 75 | - | - | 75 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,835 | $ | 88 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 88 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2012, there was one mortgage loan that was 30 days past due. Subsequently, payment was received and this loan was brought current in April 2012.
The allowance for potential future losses on mortgage loans is maintained at a level believed by management to be adequate to absorb estimated credit losses. Managements periodic evaluation and assessment of the adequacy of the reserve is based on known and inherent risks in the portfolio, historical and industry data, current economic conditions, and other relevant factors. The Company assesses the amount it maintains in the mortgage loan allowance through an assessment of what the Company believes are relevant factors at both the macro-environmental level and specific loan basis. A loan is considered impaired if it is probable that contractual amounts due will not be collected. The Companys allowance for credit losses was $2.5 million at March 31, 2012 and $2.8 million at December 31, 2011. For information regarding managements periodic evaluation and assessment of mortgage loans and the allowance for potential future losses, please refer to Note 5 Financing Receivables in the Companys 2011 Form 10-K.
The following table details the activity of the allowance for potential future losses on mortgage loans at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
March 31, 2012 |
December 31, 2011 |
|||||||
Beginning of year |
$ | 2,849 | $ | 3,410 | ||||
Additions |
- | - | ||||||
Deductions |
(364 | ) | (561 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of period |
$ | 2,485 | $ | 2,849 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The Company has had three mortgage loan defaults in the current and prior year. One loan was foreclosed in the first quarter of 2012 and an impairment of $0.2 million was recorded. One of the loan defaults in 2011 resulted in an impairment of $0.4 million, while the second loan default in 2011 did not result in an impairment based upon the fair value of the property being greater than the loan value. The Company had no troubled loans that were restructured or modified during 2012 or 2011.
6. Variable Interest Entities
The Company invests in certain affordable housing and real estate joint ventures which are considered to be variable interest entities (VIEs) and are included in Real Estate in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The assets held in affordable housing real estate joint venture VIEs are primarily residential real estate properties that are restricted to provide affordable housing under federal or state programs for varying periods of time. The restrictions primarily apply to the rents that may be paid by tenants residing in the properties during the term of an agreement to remain in the affordable housing program. Investments in real estate joint ventures are equity interests in partnerships or limited liability corporations that may or may not participate in profits or residual value. In certain cases, the Company may issue fixed-rate senior mortgage loan investments secured by properties controlled by VIEs. These investments are classified as mortgage loans in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and
27
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
the income received from such investments is recorded as investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. For additional information, please refer to Note 6 - Variable Interest Entities in the Companys 2011 Form 10-K.
The following table presents the carrying amount and maximum exposure to loss relating to VIEs for which the Company holds a variable interest, but is not the primary beneficiary, and which had not been consolidated at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The table includes investments in eight real estate joint ventures and 28 affordable housing real estate joint ventures at March 31, 2012 and investments in eleven real estate joint ventures and 28 affordable housing real estate joint ventures at December 31, 2011.
March 31 2012 |
December 31 2011 |
|||||||||||||||
Carrying Amount |
Maximum Exposure to Loss |
Carrying Amount |
Maximum Exposure to Loss |
|||||||||||||
Real estate joint ventures |
$ | 24,170 | $ | 24,170 | $ | 35,551 | $ | 35,551 | ||||||||
Affordable housing real estate joint ventures |
22,127 | 61,007 | 20,749 | 61,124 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 46,297 | $ | 85,177 | $ | 56,300 | $ | 96,675 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The maximum exposure to loss relating to the real estate joint ventures and affordable housing real estate joint ventures, as shown in the table above, is equal to the carrying amounts plus any unfunded equity commitments, exposure to potential recapture of tax credits, guarantees of debt or other obligations of the VIE with recourse to the Company. Unfunded equity and loan commitments typically require financial or operating performance by other parties and have not yet become due or payable but which may become due in the future.
At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had $4.3 million and $6.4 million, respectively, in fixed-rate senior mortgage loan commitments outstanding to the benefit of entities that are also real estate joint venture VIEs. The loan commitments are included in the discussion of commitments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for both periods. The Company also has contingent commitments to fund additional equity contributions for operating support to certain real estate joint venture VIEs, which could result in additional exposure to loss. However, the Company is not able to quantify the amount of these contingent commitments.
In addition, the maximum exposure to loss on affordable housing joint ventures at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 includes $12.5 million and $13.2 million, respectively, of losses which could be realized if the tax credits received by the VIEs were recaptured. Recapture events would cause the Company to reverse some or all of the benefit previously recognized by the Company or third parties to whom the tax credit interests were transferred. A recapture event can occur at any time during a 15-year required compliance period. The principal causes of recapture include financial default and non-compliance with affordable housing program requirements by the properties controlled by the VIE. The potential exposure due to recapture may be mitigated by guarantees from the managing member or managing partner in the VIE, insurance contracts, or changes in the residual value accruing to the Companys interests in the VIEs.
7. Change in Accounting Principle
The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-26 Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts effective January 1, 2012. This guidance modifies the types of costs incurred by insurance entities that can be capitalized when issuing or renewing insurance contracts. The guidance defines allowable deferred acquisition costs as incremental or directly related to the successful acquisition of new or renewal contracts. In addition, certain costs related directly to acquisition activities performed by the insurer, such as underwriting and policy issuance, are also deferrable. This guidance also defines the considerations for the deferral of direct-response advertising costs.
Effective January 1, 2012, the Company prospectively adopted this guidance. Pursuant to this guidance, the Company evaluated the types of acquisition costs it capitalizes. The Company capitalizes agent compensation and benefits and other expenses that are directly related to the successful acquisition of contracts. The Company also capitalizes expenses directly related to activities performed by the Company, such as underwriting, policy issuance, and processing fees incurred in connection with successful contract acquisitions.
28
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
Deferred acquisition costs are capitalized as incurred. These costs for life insurance products are generally deferred and amortized over the premium paying period. Policy acquisition costs that relate to interest sensitive and variable insurance products are deferred and amortized in relation to the estimated gross profits to be realized over the lives of the contracts. For interest sensitive and variable insurance products, estimated gross profits are composed of net interest income, net realized investment gains and losses, fees, surrender charges, expenses, and mortality gains and losses. At the issuance of policies, projections of estimated gross profits are made which are then replaced by actual gross profits over the lives of the policies. The Company considers the following assumptions to be of significance when projecting future estimated gross profits: mortality, interest rates and spreads, surrender and withdrawal rates and expense margins.
The amount of acquisition costs capitalized during the first quarter of 2012, the period of adoption, was $9.7 million. The amount of acquisition costs that would have been capitalized during the first quarter of 2012 if the Companys previous policy had been applied during that period would have been $8.7 million. Thus, the adoption of this guidance resulted in a $1.0 million increase in the amount of acquisition costs capitalized. In addition, the implementation of this guidance also impacted the amortization of DAC and benefit and contract reserve change on selected products. The net result of the adoption of ASU No. 2010-26 was a $0.7 million increase in pretax earnings in the first quarter of 2012.
8. Separate Accounts
The Company has a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (GMWB) rider that can be added to new or existing variable annuity contracts. The rider provides an enhanced withdrawal benefit that guarantees a stream of income payments to an owner or annuitant, regardless of the contract account value. The value of variable annuity separate accounts with the GMWB rider was $94.2 million at March 31, 2012 (December 31, 2011$86.6 million) and the guarantee liability was ($1.0) million at March 31, 2012 (December 31, 2011($0.2) million). The value of the GMWB rider is recorded at fair value. The change in this value is included in policyholder benefits in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The value of variable annuity separate accounts with the GMWB rider is recorded in separate account liabilities and the value of the rider is included in other policyholder funds in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The determination of fair value of the GMWB liability requires models that use actuarial and financial market assumptions, which reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the contract, including adjustments for risk and issuer non-performance.
Guarantees are offered under variable universal life and variable annuity contracts: a guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB) rider is available on certain variable universal life contracts, and GMDB are provided on all variable annuities. The GMDB rider for variable universal life and variable annuity contracts guarantees the death benefit for specified periods of time, regardless of investment performance, provided cumulative premium requirements are met. The total reserve held for the variable annuity GMDB at March 31, 2012 was $0.1 million (December 31, 2011$0.2 million).
9. Notes Payable
The Company had no notes payable at March 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011.
As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (FHLB) with a capital investment of $4.8 million, the Company has the ability to borrow on a collateralized basis from the FHLB. The Company received dividends on the capital investment of less than $0.1 million in both the first quarter of 2012 and 2011.
The Company has unsecured revolving lines of credit of $60.0 million with two major commercial banks with no balances outstanding and which are at variable interest rates based upon short-term indices. These lines of credit will expire in June of 2012. The Company anticipates renewing these lines as they come due.
10. Income Taxes
The first quarter income tax expense was $9.6 million or 33% of income before tax for 2012, versus $2.5 million or 34% of income before tax for the prior year period.
The effective income tax rate in 2012 was less than the prevailing corporate federal income tax rate of 35% primarily due to permanent differences, including the dividends-received deduction, and tax benefits related to affordable housing investments.
29
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
The effective income tax rate in 2011 was less than the prevailing corporate federal income tax rate of 35% primarily due to permanent differences, including the dividends-received deduction, which resulted in a tax benefit of approximately 2% of income before tax. Partially offsetting the benefit from the permanent differences was a tax expense of approximately 1% of income before tax related to affordable housing investments.
The Company did not have any uncertain tax positions at March 31, 2012.
At March 31, 2012, the Company had a $5.6 million current tax liability and a $69.1 million deferred tax liability compared to a $0.3 million current tax recoverable and a $68.8 million deferred tax liability at December 31, 2011.
11. Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits
The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost for the first quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:
Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | |||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31 | March 31 | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 199 | $ | 161 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
1,475 | 1,871 | 452 | 387 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(2,225 | ) | (2,342 | ) | (8 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of: |
||||||||||||||||
Unrecognized actuarial gain (loss) |
(1,425 | ) | 896 | 70 | 4 | |||||||||||
Unrecognized prior service cost |
- | - | (63 | ) | (68 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | (2,175 | ) | $ | 425 | $ | 650 | $ | 475 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2012, the Company identified an error related to the amortization period for unrecognized actuarial gains and losses for its pension plan. The Company determined that upon curtailment of the plan on January 1, 2011, the status of the plan participants should have changed from active to inactive. The amortization period was corrected from the average remaining service period of plan participants, approximately 10 years, to the average remaining life expectancy of plan participants, approximately 26 years. The Company has recognized approximately a $2.0 million pre-tax benefit related to the reversal of amortization recorded during 2011.
12. Share-Based Payment
The Company has a long-term incentive plan for senior management that provides a cash award to participants for the increase in the share price of the Companys common stock through units (phantom shares) assigned by the Board of Directors. The cash award is calculated over a three-year interval on a calendar year basis. At the conclusion of each three-year interval, participants will receive a cash award based on the increase in the share price during a defined measurement period, times the number of units. The increase in the share price will be determined based on the change in the share price from the beginning to the end of the three-year interval. Dividends are accrued and paid at the end of each three-year interval to the extent that they exceed negative stock price appreciation. Plan payments are contingent on the continued employment of the participant unless termination is due to a qualifying event such as death, disability or retirement. The Company does not make payments in shares, warrants or options.
No payments were made under this plan during quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
At each reporting period, an estimate of the share-based compensation expense is accrued, utilizing the share price at the period end. Accruals of share-based compensation as operating expense were $0.3 million and $0.1 million, net of tax, in the first quarters of 2012 and 2011, respectively.
30
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
13. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes the unrealized investment gains or losses on securities available for sale (net of adjustments for realized investment gains or losses) net of adjustments to DAC, VOBA, future policy benefits, and policyholder account balances. In addition, other comprehensive income includes the change in the liability for benefit plan obligations. Other comprehensive income reflects these items net of tax.
The table below provides information about comprehensive income for the first quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
Quarter Ended March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Before-Tax | Tax (Expense) | Net-of-Tax | ||||||||||
Amount | or Benefit | Amount | ||||||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year |
||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities |
$ | 7,324 | $ | 2,563 | $ | 4,761 | ||||||
Equity securities |
2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Less reclassification adjustments: |
||||||||||||
Net realized investment gains (losses), excluding impairment losses |
468 | 164 | 304 | |||||||||
Other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in earnings |
(268 | ) | (94 | ) | (174 | ) | ||||||
Other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive income |
108 | 38 | 70 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) excluding impairment losses |
7,018 | 2,456 | 4,562 | |||||||||
Effect on DAC and VOBA |
(3,800 | ) | (1,330 | ) | (2,470 | ) | ||||||
Future policy benefits |
(2,256 | ) | (789 | ) | (1,467 | ) | ||||||
Policyholder account balances |
(116 | ) | (41 | ) | (75 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Other comprehensive income |
$ | 846 | $ | 296 | $ | 550 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income |
19,441 | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 19,991 | ||||||||||
|
|
31
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Before-Tax | Tax (Expense) | Net-of-Tax | ||||||||||
Amount | or Benefit | Amount | ||||||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year |
||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities |
$ | (146 | ) | $ | (51 | ) | $ | (95 | ) | |||
Equity securities |
28 | 10 | 18 | |||||||||
Less reclassification adjustments: |
||||||||||||
Net realized investment gains (losses), excluding impairment losses |
1,120 | 392 | 728 | |||||||||
Other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in earnings |
(269 | ) | (94 | ) | (175 | ) | ||||||
Other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive income |
58 | 20 | 38 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) excluding impairment losses |
(1,027 | ) | (359 | ) | (668 | ) | ||||||
Effect on DAC and VOBA |
67 | 24 | 43 | |||||||||
Future policy benefits |
1,107 | 387 | 720 | |||||||||
Policyholder account balances |
10 | 3 | 7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Other comprehensive income |
$ | 157 | $ | 55 | $ | 102 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income |
4,791 | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 4,893 | ||||||||||
|
|
The following table provides accumulated balances related to each component of accumulated other comprehensive income at March 31, 2012.
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Non-Impaired Securities |
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Impaired Securities |
Benefit Plan Obligations |
DAC/ VOBA Impact |
Future Policy Benefits |
Policyholder Account Balances |
Tax Effect | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year |
$ | 213,800 | $ | (15,612 | ) | $ | (78,451 | ) | $ | (56,971 | ) | $ | (15,903 | ) | $ | (578 | ) | $ | (16,199 | ) | $ | 30,086 | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
2,138 | 4,880 | - | (3,800 | ) | (2,256 | ) | (116 | ) | (296 | ) | 550 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
End of period |
$ | 215,938 | $ | (10,732 | ) | $ | (78,451 | ) | $ | (60,771 | ) | $ | (18,159 | ) | $ | (694 | ) | $ | (16,495 | ) | $ | 30,636 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Earnings Per Share
Due to the Companys capital structure and the absence of other potentially dilutive securities, there is no difference between basic and diluted earnings per common share for any of the periods reported. The average number of shares outstanding for the quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was 11,309,395 and 11,467,208, respectively. The number of shares outstanding at March 31, 2012 and 2011 was 11,309,477 and 11,467,319, respectively.
32
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
15. Segment Information
The following schedule provides the financial performance of each of the three reportable operating segments of the Company.
Individual Insurance |
Group Insurance |
Old American |
Intercompany Eliminations1 |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Insurance revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
First quarter: |
2012 | $ | 28,569 | $ | 12,067 | $ | 17,300 | $ | (99 | ) | $ | 57,837 | ||||||||||||
2011 | 30,732 | 12,554 | 16,708 | (135 | ) | 59,859 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
First quarter: |
2012 | $ | 41,121 | $ | 128 | $ | 2,960 | $ | - | $ | 44,209 | |||||||||||||
2011 | 42,113 | 145 | 3,133 | - | 45,391 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
First quarter: |
2012 | $ | 19,487 | $ | (335 | ) | $ | 289 | $ | - | $ | 19,441 | ||||||||||||
2011 | 6,105 | (400 | ) | (914 | ) | - | 4,791 |
1 | Elimination entries to remove intercompany transactions for life and accident and health insurance that the Company purchases for its employees and agents were as follows: insurance revenues from the Group Insurance segment and operating expenses from the Individual Insurance segment to arrive at Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. |
16. Commitments
In the normal course of business, the Company has open purchase and sale commitments. At March 31, 2012, the Company had purchase commitments to fund mortgage loans and other investments of $13.5 million. Included in this total, the Company had commitments to originate mortgage loans of $8.9 million at March 31, 2012 with fixed interest rates ranging from 4.125% to 5.50%. At March 31, 2012, the Company also had commitments to fund one construction-to-permanent loan of $0.3 million that is subject to the borrowers performance.
17. Contingent Liabilities
The Company is occasionally involved in litigation, both as a defendant and as a plaintiff. The life insurance industry, including the Company and its subsidiaries, has been subject to an increase in litigation in recent years. Such litigation has been pursued on behalf of purported classes of insurance purchasers, often questioning the conduct of insurers in the marketing of their products. In addition, state regulatory bodies, the SEC, FINRA, and other regulatory bodies regularly make inquiries and conduct examinations or investigations concerning the Companys compliance with laws in relation to, but not limited to, insurance, securities and activities of broker-dealers and investment advisors.
The Companys retail broker-dealer subsidiary is in an industry that involves substantial risks of liability. The Companys broker-dealer subsidiary, SFS, has been named as a defendant in several new cases in recent periods. In recent years, regulatory proceedings, litigation, and FINRA arbitration actions related to registered representative activity and securities products (including, mutual funds, variable annuities, and alternative investments, such as real estate investment products and oil and gas investments) have continued to increase. Given the significant decline in the major market indices beginning in 2008, and the generally poor performance of investments that have historically been considered safe and conservative, there is the potential for an increase in the number of proceedings to which a broker-dealer may be named as a party.
In addition to the above, the Company and its subsidiaries are defendants in, or subject to, other claims or legal actions related to insurance and investment products. Some of these claims and legal actions are in jurisdictions where juries are given substantial latitude in assessing damages, including punitive damages.
Although no assurances can be given and no determinations can be made at this time, management believes that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these legal actions and other claims would not have a material effect on the Companys business, results of operations or financial position.
33
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)Continued
In accordance with applicable accounting guidelines, the Company has established an accrued liability for litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and estimable. As a litigation or regulatory matter develops, it is evaluated on an ongoing basis, in conjunction with outside counsel, as to whether the matter presents a loss contingency that meets conditions indicating the need for accrual and/or disclosure. If and when a loss contingency related to litigation or regulatory matters is deemed to be both probable and estimable, the Company establishes an accrued liability. This accrued liability is then monitored for further developments that may affect the amount of the accrued liability.
18. Guarantees and Indemnifications
The Company is subject to various indemnification obligations issued in conjunction with certain transactions, primarily assumption reinsurance agreements, stock purchase agreements, mortgage servicing agreements, tax credit assignment agreements, construction and lease guarantees and borrowing agreements whose terms range in duration and often are not explicitly defined. Generally, a maximum obligation is not explicitly stated. Therefore, the overall maximum amount of the obligation under the indemnifications cannot be reasonably estimated. The Company is unable to estimate with certainty the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to these indemnifications. The Company believes that the likelihood is remote that material payments would be required under such indemnifications and therefore such indemnifications would not result in a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations.
19. Subsequent Events
On April 23, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share that will be paid May 9, 2012 to stockholders of record as of May 3, 2012.
34
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Amounts are stated in thousands, except share data, or as otherwise noted.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is intended to provide in narrative form the perspective of the management of Kansas City Life Insurance Company (the Company) on its financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and certain other factors that may affect its future results. The following is a discussion and analysis of the results of operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and the financial condition of the Company at March 31, 2012. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in this document, as well as the Companys 2011 Form 10-K.
Overview
Kansas City Life Insurance Company is a financial services company that is predominantly focused on the underwriting, sales, and administration of life insurance and annuity products. The consolidated entity (the Company) primarily consists of three life insurance companies. Kansas City Life Insurance Company (Kansas City Life) is the parent company. Sunset Life Insurance Company of America (Sunset Life) and Old American Insurance Company (Old American) are wholly-owned subsidiaries. For additional information, please refer to the Overview included in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Companys 2011 Form 10-K.
Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information
This report reviews the Companys financial condition and results of operations, and historical information is presented and discussed. Where appropriate, factors that may affect future financial performance are also identified and discussed. Certain statements made in this report include forward-looking statements that fall within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements rather than historical facts and may contain words like believe, expect, estimate, project, forecast, anticipate, plan, will, shall, and other words, phrases, or expressions with similar meaning.
Actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements as a result of risks and uncertainties. Those risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risk factors listed in Item 1A. Risk Factors and Cautionary Factors that may Affect Future Results as filed in the Companys 2011 Form 10-K. For additional information, please refer to the Overview included in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Companys 2011 Form 10-K.
35
Consolidated Results of Operations
Summary of Results
The Company earned net income of $19.4 million in the first quarter of 2012 compared to $4.8 million in the first quarter of 2011. Net income per share was $1.72 in the first quarter of 2012 versus $0.42 in same period in the prior year. The following table presents variances between the results for the first quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. Additional information on these items is presented below.
Insurance and other revenues |
$ | (2,245 | ) | |
Net investment income |
(1,182 | ) | ||
Net realized investment gains |
14,876 | |||
Policyholder benefits and interest credited to policyholder account balances |
6,727 | |||
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs |
1,683 | |||
Operating expenses |
1,903 | |||
Income tax expense |
(7,112 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total variance |
$ | 14,650 | ||
|
|
Sales
The Company measures sales in terms of new premiums and deposits. Sales of traditional life insurance, immediate annuities, and accident and health products are reported as premium income for financial statement purposes. Deposits received from the sale of interest sensitive products, including universal life insurance, fixed deferred annuities, variable universal life, variable annuities, and supplementary contracts without life contingencies are reflected as deposits in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The Companys marketing plan for individual products focuses on three main aspects: providing financial security with respect to life insurance, the accumulation of long-term value, and future retirement income needs. The primary emphasis is on the growth of individual life insurance business, including new premiums for individual life products and new deposits for universal life and variable universal life products.
Sales are primarily made through the Companys existing sales force. The Company emphasizes growth of the sales force with the addition of new general agents and agents. The Company believes that increased sales will result through both the number and productivity of general agents and agents. In addition, the Company places an emphasis on training and direct support to the field force to assist new agents in their start-up phase. This assistance includes support to existing agents to stay abreast of the ever-changing regulatory environment and to introduce agents to new products and enhanced features of existing products. On occasion, the Company may also selectively utilize third-party marketing arrangements to enhance its sales objectives. This allows the Company flexibility to identify niches or pursue unique avenues in the existing market environment and to react quickly to take advantage of opportunities when they occur.
The Company also markets a series of group products. These products include group life, dental, disability, and vision products. The primary growth strategies for these products include increased productivity of the existing group representatives; planned expansion of the group distribution system; and to selectively utilize third-party marketing arrangements. Further, growth is to be supported by the addition of new products to the portfolio, particularly voluntary-type products.
36
The following table presents gross premiums by new and renewal business, less reinsurance ceded, as included in insurance revenues for the first quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. New premiums are also detailed by product.
Quarter Ended March 31 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | % Change | 2011 | % Change | |||||||||||||
New premiums: |
||||||||||||||||
Individual life insurance |
$ | 4,356 | (1 | ) | $ | 4,411 | 12 | |||||||||
Immediate annuities |
1,708 | (37 | ) | 2,709 | (50 | ) | ||||||||||
Group life insurance |
481 | (3 | ) | 494 | (21 | ) | ||||||||||
Group accident and health insurance |
2,544 | (30 | ) | 3,624 | 9 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total new premiums |
9,089 | (19 | ) | 11,238 | (15 | ) | ||||||||||
Renewal premiums |
37,250 | 5 | 35,446 | 2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total premiums |
46,339 | (1 | ) | 46,684 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Reinsurance ceded |
(13,635 | ) | 4 | (13,059 | ) | 1 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Premiums, net |
$ | 32,704 | (3 | ) | $ | 33,625 | (4 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total premiums decreased $0.3 million or 1% in the first quarter of 2012 versus the same period in the prior year, as total new premiums decreased $2.1 million or 19% and total renewal premiums increased $1.8 million or 5%. The decrease in total new premiums primarily reflected reductions of $1.1 million or 30% and $1.0 million or 37% in new group accident and health insurance and immediate annuities, respectively. New group accident and health insurance premiums decreased due to declines in short-term disability and dental sales. Immediate annuity receipts can have sizeable fluctuations, as receipts from policyholders largely result from one-time premiums rather than recurring premiums. The decrease in new immediate annuity sales can also be attributed to lower interest rates and increased competition from alternative products. The increase in renewal premiums was largely due to a $1.3 million or 14% increase in group accident and health premiums and a $0.8 million increase in individual life insurance premiums. The increase in group accident and health renewal premiums was largely due to increases in short-term disability product line renewals.
The following table reconciles deposits with the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and provides detail by new and renewal deposits for the first quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. New deposits are also detailed by product.
Quarter Ended March 31 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | % Change | 2011 | % Change | |||||||||||||
New deposits: |
||||||||||||||||
Universal life insurance |
$ | 3,303 | 17 | $ | 2,812 | (18 | ) | |||||||||
Variable universal life insurance |
157 | (30 | ) | 225 | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Fixed deferred annuities |
19,150 | 29 | 14,892 | 35 | ||||||||||||
Variable annuities |
3,961 | 3 | 3,837 | (35 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total new deposits |
26,571 | 22 | 21,766 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Renewal deposits |
34,892 | (2 | ) | 35,698 | 8 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total deposits |
$ | 61,463 | 7 | $ | 57,464 | 7 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Total new deposits increased $4.8 million or 22% in the first quarter of 2012 compared with the first quarter of 2011. This change was primarily due to a $4.3 million or 29% increase in new fixed deferred annuity deposits and a $0.5 million or 17% increase in new universal life deposits. Total renewal deposits decreased $0.8 million or 2% in the first quarter of 2012 versus last year. Renewal variable annuity deposits decreased $1.1 million or 37%. Partially offsetting this was a $0.5 million or 6% increase in renewal fixed deferred annuity deposits.
Insurance Revenues
Insurance revenues consist of premiums, net of reinsurance, and contract charges. In the first quarter of 2012, total insurance revenues decreased $2.0 million or 3%, reflecting a $0.9 million or 3% decrease in net premiums and a $1.1 million or 4% decrease in contract charges. Total individual life premiums increased $0.8 million or 3% and total accident and health premiums were essentially flat compared with last year. Offsetting these, total immediate annuity premiums decreased $1.3 million or 42%.
37
Contract charges consist of cost of insurance, expense loads, amortization of unearned revenues, and surrender charges on policyholder account balances. Certain contract charges are not recognized in income immediately but are deferred and are amortized into income in proportion to the expected future gross profits of the business, in a manner similar to DAC. Profit expectations are based upon assumptions of future interest spreads, mortality margins, expense margins, and policy and premium persistency experience. At least annually, a review is performed of the assumptions related to profit expectations. If it is determined the assumptions should be revised, the impact is recorded as a change in the revenue reported in the current period as an unlocking adjustment.
Contract charges are impacted by the sales of new products and the persistency of both existing and closed blocks of business. The closed blocks of business reflect policies and companies that the Company has purchased but to which the Company is not actively pursuing marketing efforts to generate new sales and has the intent of servicing to achieve long-term profit streams. Total contract charges on closed blocks equaled 35% of total consolidated contract charges in both the first quarters of 2012 and 2011. Total contract charges on closed blocks declined 3% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011, while total contract charges on open, or ongoing, blocks of business decreased 5%.
Total contract charges on all blocks of business decreased $1.1 million or 4% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011. The largest factor in the 2012 decline was a $0.8 million decrease in deferred revenue, largely resulting from a system upgrade during 2011 that led to enhanced reinsurance modeling capabilities. In addition, cost of insurance charges decreased $0.2 million, largely due to the runoff of closed blocks.
The Company uses reinsurance as a means to mitigate its risks and to reduce the earnings volatility from claims. Reinsurance ceded premiums increased $0.6 million or 4% in the first quarter as compared to the same period in 2011. The Group segment experienced a $0.7 million or 30% increase in reinsurance ceded, reflecting increased disability and group life sales that were reinsured. Reinsurance ceded for the Old American segment declined $0.1 million or 18% in the first quarter of 2012, reflecting the continued runoff of a large closed block of reinsured business. Reinsurance ceded for the Individual Insurance segment remained essentially flat in the first quarter of 2012 compared to one year earlier.
Investment Revenues
Gross investment income is largely composed of interest, dividends and other earnings on fixed maturity securities, equity securities, short-term investments, mortgage loans, real estate, and policy loans. Gross investment income decreased $1.5 million or 3% in the first quarter of 2012, compared with the same period in 2011. While average invested assets increased during 2012, this was more than offset by lower yields earned on certain investments.
Fixed maturity securities provided a majority of the Companys investment income during the quarter ended March 31, 2012. Income on these investments declined $1.5 million or 4% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the prior year, reflecting declines in average invested assets and yields earned.
Investment income from mortgage loans increased $0.7 million or 8% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. This improvement was largely the result of higher mortgage loan portfolio holdings in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011, as the Company significantly increased the mortgage loan balance through purchases made during 2011.
In addition, the market value declined on an alternative investment fund, which resulted in a decrease of investment income of $0.3 million in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011.
Net investment income is stated net of investment expenses. Investment expenses decreased $0.3 million or 9% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. This change is largely attributable to decreased real estate expenses, resulting from the sale of several properties.
The Company realizes investment gains and losses from several sources, including write-downs of investments and sales of investment securities and real estate. Many securities purchased by the Company contain call provisions, which allow the issuer to redeem the securities at a particular price. Depending upon the terms of the call provision and price at which the security was purchased, a gain or loss may be realized.
38
The following table provides detail concerning realized investment gains and losses for the first quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
March 31 | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Gross gains resulting from: |
||||||||
Sales of investment securities |
$ | 313 | $ | 311 | ||||
Investment securities called and other |
208 | 863 | ||||||
Sales of real estate |
15,170 | - | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total gross gains |
15,691 | 1,174 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gross losses resulting from: |
||||||||
Investment securities called and other |
(53 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||
Mortgage loans |
(165 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total gross losses |
(218 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||
Change in allowance for potential future losses on mortgage loans |
364 | - | ||||||
Amortization of DAC and VOBA |
- | (105 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net realized investment gains, exluding impairment losses |
15,837 | 1,012 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings: |
||||||||
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses |
(268 | ) | (269 | ) | ||||
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income |
108 | 58 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
(160 | ) | (211 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net realized investment gains |
$ | 15,677 | $ | 801 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded a net realized investment gain of $15.7 million in the first quarter of 2012, compared with a $0.8 million net realized investment gain in the first quarter of 2011. During the first quarter of 2012, investment gains on sales of real estate totaled $15.2 million. In addition, the Company recorded $0.3 million in gains from the sale of investment securities and $0.2 million in gains from investment securities called and other. Partially offsetting these gains, investment losses of $0.2 million were recorded due to write-downs of investment securities that were considered other-than-temporarily impaired. In the above table, investment securities called and other includes, but is not limited to, principal payments and sinking funds.
The Companys analysis of securities for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 resulted in the determination that seven fixed-maturity securities had other-than-temporary impairments and were written down by a combined $0.2 million due to credit impairments. These seven securities accounted for all of the other-than-temporary impairments in the first quarter of 2012. These residential mortgage-backed securities had incremental losses, reflecting deterioration in the present value of expected future cash flows. The additional losses from these residential mortgage-backed securities totaled $0.3 million in the first quarter of 2012, including $0.1 million that was determined to be non-credit and was recognized in other comprehensive income. The total fair value of the affected securities after the write-downs was $52.3 million.
39
The following table summarizes securities with other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings by business segment during the first quarters of 2012 and 2011 by asset class:
Quarter Ended | ||||
March 31 | ||||
2012 | ||||
Bonds: |
||||
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities: |
||||
Individual Insurance |
$ | 143 | ||
Old American |
17 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
$ | 160 | ||
|
|
|||
Segment detail: |
||||
Individual Insurance |
$ | 143 | ||
Old American |
17 | |||
|
|
|||
Consolidated total |
$ | 160 | ||
|
|
|||
Quarter Ended | ||||
March 31 | ||||
2011 | ||||
Bonds: |
||||
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities: |
||||
Individual Insurance |
$ | 188 | ||
Old American |
23 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
$ | 211 | ||
|
|
|||
Segment detail: |
||||
Individual Insurance |
$ | 188 | ||
Old American |
23 | |||
|
|
|||
Consolidated total |
$ | 211 | ||
|
|
The following table provides detail regarding investment securities that were written down through earnings during the first quarter of 2012 by business segment, none of which exceeded $0.5 million on a consolidated basis.
Impairment Loss | ||||||||||||||
Security |
Individual Insurance |
Old American |
Consolidated | Description | ||||||||||
Other - 7 securities |
$ | 143 | $ | 17 | $ | 160 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 143 | $ | 17 | $ | 160 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
The following table provides detail regarding investment securities that were written down through earnings during the first quarter of 2011 by business segment, none of which exceeded $0.5 million on a consolidated basis.
Impairment Loss | ||||||||||||||
Security |
Individual Insurance |
Old American |
Consolidated | Description | ||||||||||
Other - 4 securities |
$ | 188 | $ | 23 | $ | 211 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 188 | $ | 23 | $ | 211 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of Investments
The Company seeks to protect policyholders benefits and achieve a desired level of organizational profitability by optimizing risk and return on an ongoing basis through managing asset and liability cash flows, monitoring credit risk, avoiding high levels of investments that may be redeemed by the issuer, maintaining sufficiently liquid investments and avoiding undue asset concentrations through diversification, among other things.
The primary sources of investment risk to which the Company is exposed include credit risk, interest rate risk, and liquidity risk. The Companys ability to manage these risks is essential to the success of the organization. In particular, the Company devotes considerable resources to both the credit analysis of each new investment and to ongoing credit positions. A default by an issuer usually involves some loss of principal to the investor. Losses can be mitigated by timely sales of affected securities or by active involvement in a restructuring process. However, there can be no assurance that the efforts of an investor will lead to favorable outcomes in a bankruptcy or restructuring. Credit risk is managed primarily through industry, issuer, and structure diversification.
The following table provides information regarding fixed maturity and equity securities by asset class at March 31, 2012.
Total Fair Value |
% of Total |
Fair Value of Securities with Gross Unrealized Gains |
Gross Unrealized Gains |
Fair Value of Securities with Gross Unrealized Losses |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government |
$ | 130,171 | 5% | $ | 125,466 | $ | 11,886 | $ | 4,705 | $ | 58 | |||||||||||||
Federal agencies 1 |
25,280 | 1% | 25,280 | 3,075 | - | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities 1 |
113,153 | 4% | 112,859 | 9,756 | 294 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Subtotal |
268,604 | 10% | 263,605 | 24,717 | 4,999 | 59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
515,387 | 18% | 482,183 | 41,500 | 33,204 | 2,312 | ||||||||||||||||||
Energy |
184,866 | 6% | 174,272 | 19,033 | 10,594 | 144 | ||||||||||||||||||
Communications and technology |
212,852 | 7% | 199,804 | 17,497 | 13,048 | 209 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial |
329,346 | 12% | 293,243 | 18,598 | 36,103 | 2,483 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
520,095 | 18% | 466,247 | 42,792 | 53,848 | 862 | ||||||||||||||||||
Public utilities |
296,396 | 11% | 277,303 | 36,009 | 19,093 | 579 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Subtotal |
2,058,942 | 72% | 1,893,052 | 175,429 | 165,890 | 6,589 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities |
156,207 | 6% | 84,226 | 2,425 | 71,981 | 9,238 | ||||||||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
170,257 | 6% | 169,375 | 21,608 | 882 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
104,918 | 4% | 56,122 | 3,846 | 48,796 | 8,768 | ||||||||||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stocks |
11,849 | 1% | 7,766 | 337 | 4,083 | 223 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Fixed maturities |
2,770,777 | 99% | 2,474,146 | 228,362 | 296,631 | 24,897 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
37,245 | 1% | 36,137 | 1,890 | 1,108 | 149 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,808,022 | 100% | $ | 2,510,283 | $ | 230,252 | $ | 297,739 | $ | 25,046 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. |
41
The following table provides information regarding fixed maturity and equity securities by asset class at December 31, 2011.
Total Fair Value |
% of Total |
Fair Value of Securities with Gross Unrealized Gains |
Gross Unrealized Gains |
Fair Value of Securities with Gross Unrealized Losses |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
|||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government |
$ | 134,437 | 5% | $ | 133,478 | $ | 13,856 | $ | 959 | $ | 12 | |||||||||||||
Federal agencies 1 |
25,881 | 1% | 25,881 | 3,480 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities 1 |
119,637 | 4% | 118,694 | 9,901 | 943 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Subtotal |
279,955 | 10% | 278,053 | 27,237 | 1,902 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
486,880 | 18% | 461,425 | 43,710 | 25,455 | 860 | ||||||||||||||||||
Energy |
171,711 | 6% | 171,711 | 19,131 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Communications and technology |
201,393 | 7% | 194,154 | 16,566 | 7,239 | 156 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial |
318,078 | 12% | 250,403 | 15,155 | 67,675 | 5,890 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
496,487 | 18% | 481,033 | 43,788 | 15,454 | 263 | ||||||||||||||||||
Public utilities |
296,337 | 11% | 280,475 | 38,094 | 15,862 | 1,366 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Subtotal |
1,970,886 | 72% | 1,839,201 | 176,444 | 131,685 | 8,535 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities |
156,902 | 6% | 53,304 | 1,856 | 103,598 | 12,620 | ||||||||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
168,522 | 6% | 164,613 | 18,316 | 3,909 | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
94,656 | 4% | 38,253 | 3,576 | 56,403 | 9,235 | ||||||||||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stocks |
11,221 | 1% | 5,226 | 226 | 5,995 | 740 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Fixed maturities |
2,682,142 | 99% | 2,378,650 | 227,655 | 303,492 | 31,205 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
36,689 | 1% | 35,566 | 1,873 | 1,123 | 135 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,718,831 | 100% | $ | 2,414,216 | $ | 229,528 | $ | 304,615 | $ | 31,340 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. |
At December 31, 2011, the Company had $31.3 million in gross unrealized losses on investment securities which were offset by $229.5 million in gross unrealized gains. At March 31, 2012, the Companys unrealized losses on investment securities had decreased to $25.0 million and were offset by $230.3 million in gross unrealized gains. At March 31, 2012, 26% of the gross unrealized losses were in the category of corporate obligations. The financial sector was the single largest contributor to this category, reflecting the direct and indirect impact of the troubled residential real estate and mortgage markets. In addition, 37% of the gross unrealized losses were in the category of corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities, also due to the troubled residential real estate and mortgage markets. At March 31, 2012, 89% of the total fair value of the fixed maturities portfolio had unrealized gains, unchanged from December 31, 2011.
42
The following table identifies fixed maturity securities available for sale by actual or equivalent Standard & Poors rating at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Fair Value | % of Total |
Fair Value | % of Total |
|||||||||||||
AAA |
$ | 137,010 | 5% | $ | 161,802 | 6% | ||||||||||
AA |
588,203 | 21% | 570,157 | 21% | ||||||||||||
A |
833,353 | 30% | 799,565 | 30% | ||||||||||||
BBB |
1,001,802 | 36% | 939,373 | 35% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total investment grade |
2,560,368 | 92% | 2,470,897 | 92% | ||||||||||||
BB |
73,589 | 3% | 79,760 | 3% | ||||||||||||
B and below |
136,820 | 5% | 131,485 | 5% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total below investment grade |
210,409 | 8% | 211,245 | 8% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 2,770,777 | 100% | $ | 2,682,142 | 100% | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, 92% of all fixed maturity securities were investment grade. This reflects the continued high quality of securities maintained by the Company.
The following table provides information regarding fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale with unrealized losses by length of time, at March 31, 2012.
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
|||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government |
$ | 3,798 | $ | 47 | $ | 907 | $ | 11 | $ | 4,705 | $ | 58 | ||||||||||||
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities 1 |
- | - | 294 | 1 | 294 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Subtotal |
3,798 | 47 | 1,201 | 12 | 4,999 | 59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
33,204 | 2,312 | - | - | 33,204 | 2,312 | ||||||||||||||||||
Energy |
10,594 | 144 | - | - | 10,594 | 144 | ||||||||||||||||||
Communications and technology |
13,048 | 209 | - | - | 13,048 | 209 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial |
18,230 | 183 | 17,873 | 2,300 | 36,103 | 2,483 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
49,311 | 665 | 4,537 | 197 | 53,848 | 862 | ||||||||||||||||||
Public utilities |
7,169 | 327 | 11,924 | 252 | 19,093 | 579 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Subtotal |
131,556 | 3,840 | 34,334 | 2,749 | 165,890 | 6,589 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities |
12,866 | 1,779 | 59,115 | 7,459 | 71,981 | 9,238 | ||||||||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
- | - | 882 | 20 | 882 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
3,125 | 1,054 | 45,671 | 7,714 | 48,796 | 8,768 | ||||||||||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stocks |
622 | 3 | 3,461 | 220 | 4,083 | 223 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities |
151,967 | 6,723 | 144,664 | 18,174 | 296,631 | 24,897 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Equity securities |
67 | 106 | 1,041 | 43 | 1,108 | 149 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 152,034 | $ | 6,829 | $ | 145,705 | $ | 18,217 | $ | 297,739 | $ | 25,046 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. |
43
The following table provides information regarding fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale with unrealized losses by length of time, at December 31, 2011.
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
|||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government |
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 959 | $ | 12 | $ | 959 | $ | 12 | ||||||||||||
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities 1 |
649 | - | 294 | 2 | 943 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Subtotal |
649 | - | 1,253 | 14 | 1,902 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
25,455 | 860 | - | - | 25,455 | 860 | ||||||||||||||||||
Communications and technology |
7,239 | 156 | - | - | 7,239 | 156 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial |
51,273 | 2,107 | 16,402 | 3,783 | 67,675 | 5,890 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
11,765 | 119 | 3,689 | 144 | 15,454 | 263 | ||||||||||||||||||
Public utilities |
4,710 | 344 | 11,152 | 1,022 | 15,862 | 1,366 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Subtotal |
100,442 | 3,586 | 31,243 | 4,949 | 131,685 | 8,535 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities |
41,734 | 2,668 | 61,864 | 9,952 | 103,598 | 12,620 | ||||||||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
- | - | 3,909 | 61 | 3,909 | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
9,257 | 921 | 47,146 | 8,314 | 56,403 | 9,235 | ||||||||||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stocks |
2,939 | 115 | 3,056 | 625 | 5,995 | 740 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities |
155,021 | 7,290 | 148,471 | 23,915 | 303,492 | 31,205 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Equity securities |
69 | 104 | 1,054 | 31 | 1,123 | 135 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 155,090 | $ | 7,394 | $ | 149,525 | $ | 23,946 | $ | 304,615 | $ | 31,340 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. |
Gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity and equity security investments attributable to securities having gross unrealized losses of 12 months or longer was $18.2 million at March 31, 2012, a decrease from $23.9 million at December 31, 2011. The largest component of this decrease was from the corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities category, which decreased $2.5 million during the first quarter of 2012.
44
The following table summarizes the Companys investments in securities available for sale with unrealized losses at March 31, 2012.
March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
||||||||||
Securities owned without realized impairment: | ||||||||||||
Unrealized losses of 10% or less |
$ | 179,807 | $ | 176,385 | $ | 3,422 | ||||||
Unrealized losses of 20% or less and greater than 10% |
36,702 | 31,813 | 4,889 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Subtotal |
216,509 | 208,198 | 8,311 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Unrealized losses greater than 20%: |
||||||||||||
Investment grade |
||||||||||||
Less than twelve months |
4,946 | 3,754 | 1,192 | |||||||||
Twelve months or greater |
908 | 478 | 430 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total investment grade |
5,854 | 4,232 | 1,622 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Below investment grade |
||||||||||||
Less than twelve months |
7,277 | 4,974 | 2,303 | |||||||||
Twelve months or greater |
- | - | - | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total below investment grade |
7,277 | 4,974 | 2,303 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Unrealized losses greater than 20% |
13,131 | 9,206 | 3,925 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Subtotal |
229,640 | 217,404 | 12,236 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Securities owned with realized impairment: |
||||||||||||
Unrealized losses of 10% or less |
27,377 | 25,898 | 1,479 | |||||||||
Unrealized losses of 20% or less and greater than 10% |
43,698 | 37,029 | 6,669 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Subtotal |
71,075 | 62,927 | 8,148 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Unrealized losses greater than 20%: |
||||||||||||
Investment grade |
||||||||||||
Less than twelve months |
- | - | - | |||||||||
Twelve months or greater |
- | - | - | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total investment grade |
- | - | - | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Below investment grade |
||||||||||||
Less than twelve months |
- | - | - | |||||||||
Twelve months or greater |
22,070 | 17,408 | 4,662 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total below investment grade |
22,070 | 17,408 | 4,662 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Unrealized losses greater than 20% |
22,070 | 17,408 | 4,662 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Subtotal |
93,145 | 80,335 | 12,810 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 322,785 | $ | 297,739 | $ | 25,046 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
The following table summarizes the Companys investments in securities available for sale with unrealized losses at December 31, 2011.
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
||||||||||
Securities owned without realized impairment: |
||||||||||||
Unrealized losses of 10% or less |
$ | 154,445 | $ | 151,008 | $ | 3,437 | ||||||
Unrealized losses of 20% or less and greater than 10% |
53,042 | 45,689 | 7,353 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Subtotal |
207,487 | 196,697 | 10,790 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Unrealized losses greater than 20%: |
||||||||||||
Investment grade: |
||||||||||||
Less than twelve months |
4,946 | 3,752 | 1,194 | |||||||||
Twelve months or greater |
908 | 450 | 458 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total investment grade |
5,854 | 4,202 | 1,652 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Below investment grade: |
||||||||||||
Less than twelve months |
8,210 | 5,977 | 2,233 | |||||||||
Twelve months or greater |
- | - | - | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total below investment grade |
8,210 | 5,977 | 2,233 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Unrealized losses greater than 20% |
14,064 | 10,179 | 3,885 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Subtotal |
221,551 | 206,876 | 14,675 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Securities owned with realized impairment: |
||||||||||||
Unrealized losses of 10% or less |
37,639 | 36,420 | 1,219 | |||||||||
Unrealized losses of 20% or less and greater than 10% |
24,789 | 20,843 | 3,946 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Subtotal |
62,428 | 57,263 | 5,165 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Unrealized losses greater than 20%: |
||||||||||||
Investment grade: |
||||||||||||
Less than twelve months |
- | - | - | |||||||||
Twelve months or greater |
- | - | - | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total investment grade |
- | - | - | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Below investment grade: |
||||||||||||
Less than twelve months |
29,391 | 23,178 | 6,213 | |||||||||
Twelve months or greater |
22,585 | 17,298 | 5,287 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total below investment grade |
51,976 | 40,476 | 11,500 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Unrealized losses greater than 20% |
51,976 | 40,476 | 11,500 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Subtotal |
114,404 | 97,739 | 16,665 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 335,955 | $ | 304,615 | $ | 31,340 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
The following table provides information on fixed maturity securities with gross unrealized losses by actual or equivalent Standard & Poors rating at March 31, 2012.
Fair Value |
% of Total |
Unrealized Losses |
% of Total |
|||||||||||||
AAA |
$ | 3,798 | 1% | $ | 130 | 1% | ||||||||||
AA |
54,163 | 18% | 4,589 | 18% | ||||||||||||
A |
43,032 | 15% | 1,099 | 4% | ||||||||||||
BBB |
78,167 | 26% | 2,520 | 10% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total investment grade |
179,160 | 60% | 8,338 | 33% | ||||||||||||
BB |
16,346 | 6% | 1,131 | 5% | ||||||||||||
B and below |
101,125 | 34% | 15,428 | 62% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total below investment grade |
117,471 | 40% | 16,559 | 67% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 296,631 | 100% | $ | 24,897 | 100% | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides information on fixed maturity securities with gross unrealized losses by actual or equivalent Standard & Poors rating at December 31, 2011.
Fair Value |
% of Total |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
% of Total |
|||||||||||||
AAA |
$ | 32,245 | 11% | $ | 4,475 | 14% | ||||||||||
AA |
8,986 | 3% | 125 | 1% | ||||||||||||
A |
32,550 | 11% | 1,207 | 4% | ||||||||||||
BBB |
65,557 | 21% | 2,925 | 9% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total investment grade |
139,338 | 46% | 8,732 | 28% | ||||||||||||
BB |
45,845 | 15% | 4,063 | 13% | ||||||||||||
B and below |
118,309 | 39% | 18,410 | 59% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total below investment grade |
164,154 | 54% | 22,473 | 72% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 303,492 | 100% | $ | 31,205 | 100% | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a discussion of all non-residential mortgage-backed securities whose fair value had been less than 80% of amortized cost for at least six consecutive months at March 31, 2012. The Company has considered a wide variety of factors to determine that these positions were not other-than-temporarily impaired.
Security |
Description | |
Financial institution |
Institution impacted by housing and mortgage crisis. The security continues to perform within contractual obligations. | |
Collateralized debt obligation |
Impacted by delinquencies and foreclosures in subprime and Alt-A markets and extreme declines in market valuations regardless of individual security performance. There continues to be overcollateralization within the structure and the investment continues to perform within contractual obligations. |
The discounted future cash flow calculation typically becomes the primary determinant of whether any portion and to what extent an unrealized loss is due to credit on loan-backed and similar asset-backed securities with significant indications of potential other-than-temporary impairment. Such indications typically include below investment grade ratings and significant unrealized losses for an extended period of time, among other factors. The Company identified 17 non-U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities that were determined to have such indications at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Discounted future cash flow analysis was performed for each of these securities to determine if any portion of the impairment was due to credit and deemed to be other-than-temporary. The discount rate used in calculating the present value
47
of future cash flows was the investment yield at the time of purchase for each security. The initial default rates were assumed to remain constant over a 24-month time frame and grade down thereafter, reflecting the general perspective of a more stabilized residential housing environment in the future.
The following tables present the range of significant assumptions used in projecting the future cash flows at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The Company believes that the assumptions below are reasonable because they are based upon the actual results of the underlying security collateral.
March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Default Rate | Initial Severity Rate | Prepayment Speed | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vintage |
Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | ||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
3.8% | 3.8% | 40% | 40% | 18.0% | 18.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
5.0% | 7.7% | 40% | 53% | 8.0% | 13.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
3.3% | 14.6% | 40% | 71% | 6.0% | 15.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
4.7% | 8.0% | 52% | 85% | 8.0% | 18.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
9.4% | 9.4% | 74% | 74% | 8.0% | 8.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Default Rate | Initial Severity Rate | Prepayment Speed | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vintage |
Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | ||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
3.9% | 3.9% | 40% | 40% | 18.0% | 18.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
4.9% | 7.7% | 40% | 56% | 8.0% | 13.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
3.5% | 13.7% | 40% | 68% | 6.0% | 15.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
4.9% | 10.0% | 52% | 90% | 8.0% | 18.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
8.8% | 8.8% | 66% | 66% | 8.0% | 8.0% |
For loan-backed and similar asset-backed securities, the determination of any amount of impairment that is due to credit is based upon the present value of projected future cash flows being less than the amortized cost of the security. This amount is recognized as a realized loss in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and the carrying value of the security is written down by the same amount. The portion of an impairment that is determined not to be due to credit is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
48
Significant unrealized losses on securities can continue for extended periods of time, particularly for certain individual securities. While this can be an indication of potential credit impairments, it can also be an indication of illiquidity in a particular sector or security. In addition, the fair value of an individual security can be heavily influenced by the complexities of varying market sentiment or uncertainty regarding the prospects for an individual security. This has been the situation in the non-U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities market in recent periods. Based upon the process described above, the Company is best able to determine if and to what extent credit impairment may exist in these securities by performing present value calculations of projected future cash flows at the conclusion of each reporting period. By reviewing the most recent data available regarding the security and other relevant industry and market factors, the Company can modify assumptions used in the cash flow projections and determine the best estimate of the portion of any impairment that is due to credit at the conclusion of each period.
The Company closely monitors its investments in securities classified as subprime. Subprime securities include all bonds or portions of bonds where the underlying collateral is made up of home equity loans or first mortgage loans to borrowers whose credit scores at the time of origination were lower than the level recognized in the market as prime. The Companys classification of subprime does not include Alt-A or jumbo loans, unless the collateral otherwise meets the preceding definition. At March 31, 2012, the fair value of investments with subprime residential mortgage exposure was $17.1 million with a related $3.2 million unrealized loss. At December 31, 2011, the Company had investments with subprime residential mortgage exposure of $17.4 million and a related $3.5 million unrealized loss. This exposure amounted to 1% of the Companys invested assets at both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. These investments are included in the Companys process for evaluation of other-than-temporarily impaired securities.
The Company has a significant level of non-U.S. Agency structured securities. Structured securities include asset-backed, residential mortgage-backed securities, along with collateralized debt obligations, collateralized mortgage obligations and other collateralized obligations. The Company monitors these securities through a combination of an analysis of vintage, credit ratings and other factors.
49
The following tables divide these investment types among vintage and credit ratings at March 31, 2012.
Fair Value |
Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gains (Losses) |
||||||||||
Residential & Non-agency MBS 1 |
||||||||||||
Investment Grade: |
||||||||||||
Vintage 2003 and earlier |
$ | 25,490 | $ | 24,705 | $ | 785 | ||||||
2004 |
29,416 | 28,360 | 1,056 | |||||||||
2005 |
- | - | - | |||||||||
2006 |
- | - | - | |||||||||
2007 |
- | - | - | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total investment grade |
54,906 | 53,065 | 1,841 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Below Investment Grade: |
||||||||||||
Vintage 2003 and earlier |
- | - | - | |||||||||
2004 |
33,760 | 33,700 | 60 | |||||||||
2005 |
74,838 | 86,121 | (11,283 | ) | ||||||||
2006 |
6,887 | 7,153 | (266 | ) | ||||||||
2007 |
3,889 | 4,691 | (802 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total below investment grade |
119,374 | 131,665 | (12,291 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Other Structured Securities: |
||||||||||||
Investment grade |
69,170 | 68,223 | 947 | |||||||||
Below investment grade |
16,154 | 18,443 | (2,289 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total other |
85,324 | 86,666 | (1,342 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total structured securities |
$ | 259,604 | $ | 271,396 | $ | (11,792 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | This chart accounts for all vintages owned by the Company. |
50
The following tables divide these investment types among vintage and credit ratings at December 31, 2011.
Fair Value |
Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gains (Losses) |
||||||||||
Residential & Non-agency MBS: 1 |
||||||||||||
Investment Grade: |
||||||||||||
Vintage 2003 and earlier |
$ | 27,700 | $ | 26,974 | $ | 726 | ||||||
2004 |
29,682 | 28,693 | 989 | |||||||||
2005 |
- | - | - | |||||||||
2006 |
- | - | - | |||||||||
2007 |
- | - | - | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total investment grade |
57,382 | 55,667 | 1,715 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Below Investment Grade: |
||||||||||||
Vintage 2003 and earlier |
- | - | - | |||||||||
2004 |
34,497 | 34,821 | (324 | ) | ||||||||
2005 |
72,619 | 87,447 | (14,828 | ) | ||||||||
2006 |
6,960 | 7,309 | (349 | ) | ||||||||
2007 |
3,868 | 4,864 | (996 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total below investment grade |
117,944 | 134,441 | (16,497 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Other Structured Securities: |
||||||||||||
Investment grade |
58,793 | 57,998 | 795 | |||||||||
Below investment grade |
16,179 | 18,444 | (2,265 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total other |
74,972 | 76,442 | (1,470 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total structured securities |
$ | 250,298 | $ | 266,550 | $ | (16,252 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | This chart accounts for all vintages owned by the Company. |
Total unrealized losses on non-U.S. Agency structured securities totaled $11.8 million at March 31, 2012, compared to $16.3 million at December 31, 2011. Total unrealized losses on these securities as a percent of total amortized cost totaled 4% at March 31, 2012, a slight improvement from 6% at year-end 2011.
The Company has written down certain investments in previous periods. Securities written down and continuing to be owned at March 31, 2012 had a fair value of $126.7 million with a net unrealized loss of $10.7 million.
The Company evaluated the current status of all investments previously written-down to determine whether the Company continues to believe that these investments were still credit-impaired to the extent previously recorded. The Companys evaluation process is similar to its impairment evaluation process. If evidence exists that the Company believes that it will receive all or a materially greater portion of its contractual maturities from securities previously written down, the accretion of income is adjusted. The Company did not change its evaluation of any investments under this process during the first quarters of 2012 or 2011.
51
The Company has less than 5% of its investment portfolio in municipal bond securities. In addition, the Company has no holdings in European sovereign debt. However, the Company does have investments in securities from countries in the European Economic Union. All of these investments are denominated in U.S. dollars. The fair value of these securities was $23.8 million with a net unrealized gain of $1.0 million at March 31, 2012, compared to a fair value of $17.4 million with a net unrealized gain of $1.2 million at December 31, 2011. In addition, the Company also has investments in other foreign companies that are denominated in U.S. dollars. The fair value of these fixed maturity securities at March 31, 2012 was $217.7 million with a net unrealized gain of $11.8 million, compared to a fair value of $204.1 million with a net unrealized gain of $9.2 million at December 31, 2011.
The Company does not have a material amount of direct or indirect guarantees for the securities in its investment portfolio. The Company did not have any direct exposure to financial guarantors at March 31, 2012. The Companys indirect exposure to financial guarantors totaled $37.6 million, which was 1% of the Companys investment assets at March 31, 2012. The unrealized gain on these investments totaled $1.4 million at March 31, 2012. The Companys indirect exposure to financial guarantors at December 31, 2011 totaled $36.8 million, which was 1% of the Companys investment assets. Total unrealized gains on these investments totaled $1.7 million at December 31, 2011.
Other Revenues
Other revenues consist primarily of supplementary contract considerations; policyholder dividends left with the Company to accumulate; income received on the sale of low income housing tax credit (LIHTC) investments by a subsidiary of the Company; and fees charged on products and sales from the Companys broker-dealer subsidiary. Other revenues decreased 9% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to one year earlier, reflecting lower supplementary contract considerations.
Policyholder Benefits
Policyholder benefits consist of death benefits (mortality), immediate annuity benefits, accident and health benefits, surrenders, interest, other benefits, and the associated increase or decrease in reserves for future policy benefits. The largest component of policyholder benefits was death benefits for the periods presented. Death benefits reflect mortality results, after consideration of the impact of reinsurance. Mortality will fluctuate from period to period. However mortality experience has generally remained within pricing expectations for the periods presented.
Policyholder benefits decreased $6.8 million or 15% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the same period one year earlier. The reduction in 2012 largely resulted from a $4.8 million decline in death benefits, net of reinsurance. This change reflected more favorable mortality results. In addition, benefit and contract reserves declined $0.6 million compared to one year earlier. This largely resulted from lower policyholder benefits and the decrease in sales of immediate annuities. Reserves are established on a nearly one-for-one basis with immediate annuity sales, and a decrease in sales year-over-year results in a reduced amount of additions to reserves on a comparative basis. In addition, the change in the fair value of the GMWB rider resulted in a $0.6 million decrease in benefit and contract reserves. Also contributing to the decrease in policyholder benefits was a reduction in group dental benefits, as discussed in the Group Insurance segment analysis.
The Company has a GMWB rider for variable annuity contracts that is considered to be a financial derivative and, as such, is accounted for at fair value. The Company determines the fair value of the GMWB rider using a risk-neutral valuation method. The value of the riders will fluctuate depending on market conditions. At March 31, 2012, the fair value of the liability decreased $0.8 million compared to the fair value at December 31, 2011. This fluctuation can be attributed to favorable returns in the capital markets, increases in risk-free swap rates, and reduced market volatility. These were partially offset by decreases in issuer discount spreads.
Interest Credited to Policyholder Account Balances
Interest is credited to policyholder account balances according to terms of the policies or contracts for universal life, fixed deferred annuities, and other investment-type products. There are minimum levels of interest crediting assumed in certain policies or contracts, as well as allowances for adjustments to be made to reflect current market conditions in certain policies or contracts. Accordingly, the Company reviews and adjusts crediting rates as necessary and appropriate. Amounts credited are a function of account balances and current period crediting rates. As account balances fluctuate, so will the amount of interest credited to policyholder account balances. Interest credited to policyholder account balances was essentially flat in the first quarter of 2012 compared with the same period one year earlier. While total policyholder account balances increased from the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2012, average crediting rates declined slightly.
52
Amortization of Deferred Acquisition Costs
The amortization of deferred acquisition costs decreased $1.7 million or 18% in the first quarter compared with the prior year. This decrease was largely the result of reduced amortization on variable products, primarily due to improved equity market performance and full amortization of a significant volume of policies in 2011. No DAC unlocking occurred in the first quarters of 2012 or 2011.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses consist of incurred commission expense from the sale of insurance products, net of the deferral of certain commissions and certain expenses directly associated with the attainment of new business, expenses from the Companys operations, the amortization of VOBA, and other expenses. Operating expenses decreased $1.9 million or 7% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to last year. This decrease reflected a decline in pension expense and a decline in the amount charged to allowance for doubtful accounts for agent receivables. The decline in pension expense is attributable to the Company having previously frozen the pension plan. In addition, VOBA amortization decreased, as described below. Partially offsetting these, salaries expense and legal fees increased.
The amortization of VOBA is included in operating expenses. VOBA is amortized in concert with each purchased block of business over a defined period. Generally, as policies run off, the amortization will decline over time. In addition, VOBA is evaluated on an ongoing basis for unlocking adjustments. If necessary, adjustments are made in the current period VOBA amortization. The amortization of VOBA in the first quarter of 2012 decreased $0.6 million or 41% compared to the same period one year earlier. The VOBA associated with the traditional life insurance block in the Old American purchase became fully amortized at December 31, 2011. Accordingly, in the first quarter ended March 31, 2012, the Company experienced a $0.5 million decrease in the amortization of VOBA. There were no adjustments or unlocking made to the VOBA amortization in the first quarter of 2012 or 2011.
Income Taxes
The first quarter income tax expense was $9.6 million or 33% of income before tax for 2012, versus $2.5 million or 34% of income before tax for the prior year period.
The effective income tax rate in 2012 was less than the prevailing corporate federal income tax rate of 35%, primarily due to permanent differences, including the dividends-received deduction, and tax benefits related to affordable housing investments.
The effective income tax rate in 2011 was less than the prevailing corporate federal income tax rate of 35%, primarily due to permanent differences, including the dividends-received deduction, which resulted in a tax benefit of approximately 2% of income before tax. Partially offsetting the benefit from the permanent differences was a tax expense of approximately 1% of income before tax related to affordable housing investments.
Operating Results by Segment
The Company has three reportable business segments, which are defined based on the nature of the products and services offered: Individual Insurance, Group Insurance, and Old American. The Individual Insurance segment consists of individual insurance products for both Kansas City Life and Sunset Life. The Individual Insurance segment is marketed through a nationwide sales force of independent general agents and third-party marketing arrangements. The Group Insurance segment consists of sales of group life, group disability, dental, and vision products. This segment is marketed through a nationwide sales force of independent general agents, group brokers, and third-party marketing arrangements. Old American consists of individual insurance products designed largely as final expense products. These products are marketed through a nationwide general agency sales force with exclusive territories, using direct response marketing to supply agents with leads. For more information, refer to Note 15Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
53
Individual Insurance
The following table presents financial data of the Individual Insurance business segment for the first quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:
Quarter Ended March 31 |
||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Insurance revenues: |
||||||||
Premiums, net |
$ | 3,436 | $ | 4,498 | ||||
Contract charges |
25,133 | 26,234 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total insurance revenues |
28,569 | 30,732 | ||||||
Investment revenues: |
||||||||
Net investment income |
41,121 | 42,113 | ||||||
Net realized investment gains, excluding impairment losses |
15,804 | 923 | ||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings: |
||||||||
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses |
(250 | ) | (234 | ) | ||||
Portion of impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive income |
107 | 46 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
(143 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total investment revenues |
56,782 | 42,848 | ||||||
Other revenues |
2,139 | 2,366 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total revenues |
87,490 | 75,946 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Policyholder benefits |
19,357 | 24,885 | ||||||
Interest credited to policyholder account balances |
20,558 | 20,481 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs |
4,010 | 5,697 | ||||||
Operating expenses |
14,499 | 15,545 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total benefits and expenses |
58,424 | 66,608 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income before income tax expense |
29,066 | 9,338 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
9,579 | 3,233 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income |
$ | 19,487 | $ | 6,105 | ||||
|
|
|
|
54
The net income for this segment in the first quarter of 2012 was $19.5 million, compared to $6.1 million in the first quarter of 2011. The following table presents variances between the results for the first quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. Additional information on these items is presented below.
Insurance and other revenues |
$ | (2,390 | ) | |
Net investment income |
(992 | ) | ||
Net realized investment gains |
14,926 | |||
Policyholder benefits and interest credited to policyholder account balances |
5,451 | |||
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs |
1,687 | |||
Operating expenses |
1,046 | |||
Income tax expense |
(6,346 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total variance |
$ | 13,382 | ||
|
|
Total insurance revenues for this segment decreased $2.2 million or 7% in the first quarter of 2012 compared with the same period in the prior year. Total premiums decreased $1.1 million or 8%, reflecting a $1.3 million or 42% decline in immediate annuity premiums. Contract charges decreased $1.1 million or 4% and reinsurance ceded premiums were essentially flat.
The following table presents gross premiums by new and renewal business, less reinsurance ceded, as included in insurance revenues for the first quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. New premiums are also detailed by product.
Quarter Ended March 31 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | % Change | 2011 | % Change | |||||||||||||
New premiums: |
||||||||||||||||
Individual life insurance |
$ | 1,154 | (16 | ) | $ | 1,370 | 5 | |||||||||
Immediate annuities |
1,708 | (37 | ) | 2,709 | (50 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total new premiums |
2,862 | (30 | ) | 4,079 | (39 | ) | ||||||||||
Renewal premiums |
10,543 | 1 | 10,421 | 1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total premiums |
13,405 | (8 | ) | 14,500 | (15 | ) | ||||||||||
Reinsurance ceded |
(9,969 | ) | - | (10,002 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Premiums, net |
$ | 3,436 | (24 | ) | $ | 4,498 | (34 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Total new premiums for this segment decreased $1.2 million or 30% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the same period one year earlier. This decline was primarily the result of a $1.0 million or 37% decrease in new immediate annuity premiums. Immediate annuity receipts can have sizeable fluctuations, as receipts from policyholders largely result from one-time premiums rather than recurring premiums. The decrease in new immediate annuity sales can also be attributed to lower interest rates and increased competition from alternative products. Total renewal premiums increased 1% compared to last year, reflecting an increase in individual life insurance premiums.
The following table provides detail by new and renewal deposits for the first quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. New deposits are also detailed by product.
Quarter Ended March 31 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | % Change | 2011 | % Change | |||||||||||||
New deposits: |
||||||||||||||||
Universal life insurance |
$ | 3,303 | 17 | $ | 2,812 | (18 | ) | |||||||||
Variable universal life insurance |
157 | (30 | ) | 225 | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Fixed deferred annuities |
19,150 | 29 | 14,892 | 35 | ||||||||||||
Variable annuities |
3,961 | 3 | 3,837 | (35 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total new deposits |
26,571 | 22 | 21,766 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Renewal deposits |
34,892 | (2 | ) | 35,698 | 8 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total deposits |
$ | 61,463 | 7 | $ | 57,464 | 7 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
55
Total new deposits increased $4.8 million or 22% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to last year, reflecting a $4.3 million or 29% increase in new fixed deferred annuity deposits and a $0.5 million or 17% increase in new universal life deposits. Total renewal deposits decreased $0.8 million or 2% in the first quarter of 2012. This decrease was due to a $1.1 million decline in renewal variable annuity deposits. This was partially offset by a $0.5 million or 6% increase in renewal fixed deferred annuity deposits.
Total contract charges decreased $1.1 million or 4% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011. This decrease reflected reduced cost of insurance charges, largely due to the runoff of closed blocks of business and a decrease in deferred revenue. The reduction in deferred revenue was largely due to lower actual gross profits experienced on certain products that resulted from a system upgrade during 2011 that led to enhanced reinsurance modeling capabilities. Total contract charges on the closed blocks equaled 35% of total consolidated contract charges in the first quarters of both 2012 and 2011. Total contract charges on closed blocks declined 3% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011. Total contract charges on open blocks of business, where there is ongoing marketing for new sales, decreased 5%.
Net investment income decreased $1.0 million or 2% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011, as an increase in average invested assets was offset by a decline in yields earned. This segment experienced a net realized investment gain of $15.7 million in the first quarter of 2012 compared to $0.7 million in the first quarter of 2011.
The Companys analysis of securities for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 resulted in the determination that seven fixed-maturity securities had other-than-temporary impairments affecting the Individual Insurance segment and were written down by a combined $0.1 million due to credit. The incremental credit impairments reflected deterioration in the present value of projected future cash flows. The additional losses from these residential mortgage-backed securities were $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2012, including $0.1 million that was determined to be non-credit and was recognized in other comprehensive income. The total fair value of the affected securities after the write-downs was $48.2 million.
Please see Consolidated Results of Operations in Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a table that provides securities that were written down through earnings by business segment for the first quarters of 2012 and 2011. This section also contains a table that provides detail regarding individual investment securities by business segment that were written down through earnings during the first quarters of 2012 and 2011.
Other revenues decreased 10% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the same period one year earlier, reflecting lower supplementary contract considerations.
Policyholder benefits decreased $5.5 million or 22% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the prior year. Death benefits, net of reinsurance ceded, decreased $3.7 million. This change reflected favorable mortality experience. In addition, benefit and contract reserves declined $1.0 million, largely due to lower policyholder benefits, decreased sales of immediate annuities, and the change in the fair value of the GMWB rider.
Interest credited to policyholder account balances was essentially flat in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the same period one year earlier. While total policyholder account balances increased from the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2012, average crediting rates declined slightly.
The amortization of deferred acquisition costs decreased $1.7 million or 30% in the first quarter compared with the prior year. This decrease was largely the result of reduced amortization on variable products, primarily due to improved equity market performance and full amortization of a significant volume of policies in 2011.
Operating expenses consist of incurred commissions, net of the capitalization of commissions, expenses from the Companys operations, the amortization of VOBA, and other expenses. Operating expenses decreased $1.0 million or 7% in the first quarter of 2012 compared with one year earlier. This decrease reflected a decline in pension expense and a decline in the amount charged to allowance for doubtful accounts for agent receivables. Partially offsetting these changes, salaries expense and legal fees increased. In addition, capitalized commissions increased $0.5 million resulting from the implementation of ASU No. 2010-26, as described in Note 7Change in Accounting Principle. This was offset by increased commissions paid to agents, reflecting increased sales of certain products.
VOBA is amortized in concert with each purchased block of business. Accordingly, as the acquired block of policies declines, the amortization will decline over time. In addition, VOBA is evaluated on an ongoing basis for unlocking adjustments. If necessary, adjustments are made in the current period VOBA amortization. The amortization of VOBA decreased $0.2 million or 16% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to one year earlier. This decrease was due to improved mortality and lower surrenders during the first quarter of 2012. There were no adjustments or unlocking made to the VOBA amortization in the first quarters of 2012 or 2011.
56
Group Insurance
The following table presents financial data of the Group Insurance business segment for the first quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
March 31 | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Insurance revenues: |
||||||||
Premiums, net |
$ | 12,067 | $ | 12,554 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total insurance revenues |
12,067 | 12,554 | ||||||
Investment revenues: |
||||||||
Net investment income |
128 | 145 | ||||||
Other revenues |
37 | 37 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total revenues |
12,232 | 12,736 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Policyholder benefits |
7,022 | 7,607 | ||||||
Operating expenses |
5,725 | 5,744 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total benefits and expenses |
12,747 | 13,351 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Loss before income tax benefit |
(515 | ) | (615 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit |
(180 | ) | (215 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net loss |
$ | (335 | ) | $ | (400 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
The following table presents gross premiums by new and renewal business, less reinsurance ceded, as included in insurance revenues for the first quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. New premiums are also detailed by product.
Quarter Ended March 31 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | % Change | 2011 | % Change | |||||||||||||
New premiums: |
||||||||||||||||
Group life insurance |
$ | 481 | (3 | ) | $ | 494 | (21 | ) | ||||||||
Group dental insurance |
932 | (32 | ) | 1,378 | (36 | ) | ||||||||||
Group disability insurance |
1,583 | (28 | ) | 2,210 | 99 | |||||||||||
Other group insurance |
29 | (19 | ) | 36 | (35 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total new premiums |
3,025 | (27 | ) | 4,118 | 4 | |||||||||||
Renewal premiums |
12,184 | 12 | 10,854 | 4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total premiums |
15,209 | 2 | 14,972 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Reinsurance ceded |
(3,142 | ) | 30 | (2,418 | ) | 14 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Premiums, net |
$ | 12,067 | (4 | ) | $ | 12,554 | 2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
Total new premiums decreased $1.1 million or 27% in the first quarter of 2012, while total renewal premiums increased $1.3 million or 12% during the first quarter compared to last year. New group disability premiums decreased $0.6 million or 28% and new group dental premiums decreased $0.4 million or 32%. The decline in new premiums reflects lower sales in both core and third-party distribution. Renewal premiums increased $1.3 million or 12%, driven primarily by renewals on the short-term disability product.
The Company uses reinsurance in several of its group product lines to help mitigate risk. Reinsurance premiums increased $0.7 million or 30% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to last year. This increase was largely due to an increase in short-term disability renewal premiums.
Policyholder benefits consist of death benefits (mortality), accident and health benefits, and the associated increase or decrease in reserves for future policy benefits. Policyholder benefits declined $0.6 million or 8% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the prior year. This improvement was largely due to a reduction in the benefits paid for the dental product line. This reduction reflects the changes that this segment made to the dental product line during 2011 to improve profitability, including increased pricing and better claim cost controls.
57
The policyholder benefit ratio is derived by dividing policyholder benefits, net of reinsurance, by total revenues. The ratio for the Group Insurance segment was 58% for the first quarter of 2012, down from 61% for the same period one year ago. The decrease was primarily the result of the decline in dental benefits previously mentioned. The policyholder benefit ratio for the dental product line decreased from 77% in the first quarter of 2011 to 72% in the first quarter of 2012. Conversely, the policyholder benefit ratio for the following products increased from the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2012: the group life product line increased from 65% to 71%; the short-term disability product line increased from 20% to 21%; and the long-term disability product line increased from 14% to 19%.
Operating expenses consist of commissions, fees to third-party marketing and administrative organizations, and expenses from the Companys operations. Operating expenses were flat in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the same period last year. This included the impact of increases in commissions and fees paid to third-party marketing and administrative organizations, which were offset by a decrease in expenses from the Companys operations.
58
Old American
The following table presents financial data for the Old American business segment for the first quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
March 31 | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Insurance revenues: |
||||||||
Premiums, net |
$ | 17,300 | $ | 16,708 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total insurance revenues |
17,300 | 16,708 | ||||||
Investment revenues: |
||||||||
Net investment income |
2,960 | 3,133 | ||||||
Net realized investment gains, excluding impairment losses |
33 | 89 | ||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings: |
||||||||
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses |
(18 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||
Portion of impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive income |
1 | 12 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
(17 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total investment revenues |
2,976 | 3,199 | ||||||
Other revenues |
9 | 5 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total revenues |
20,285 | 19,912 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Policyholder benefits |
12,091 | 12,782 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs |
3,891 | 3,887 | ||||||
Operating expenses |
3,837 | 4,711 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total benefits and expenses |
19,819 | 21,380 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) |
466 | (1,468 | ) | |||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
177 | (554 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 289 | $ | (914 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
Net income for this segment totaled $0.3 million in the first quarter of 2012, compared to a $0.9 million net loss in the first quarter of 2011. The improvement was primarily the result of a $0.9 million decrease in operating expenses, a $0.7 million decrease in policyholder benefits, and a $0.6 million increase in insurance revenues. These improvements were partially offset by a $0.7 million increase in income tax expense.
The following table presents gross premiums by new and renewal business, less reinsurance ceded, as included in insurance revenues for the first quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
Quarter Ended March 31 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | % Change | 2011 | % Change | |||||||||||||
New individual life premiums |
$ | 3,202 | 5 | $ | 3,041 | 16 | ||||||||||
Renewal premiums |
14,622 | 2 | 14,306 | 2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total premiums |
17,824 | 3 | 17,347 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Reinsurance ceded |
(524 | ) | (18 | ) | (639 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Premiums, net |
$ | 17,300 | 4 | $ | 16,708 | 4 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Insurance revenues increased 4% in the first quarter of 2012 compared with the prior year. Total new premiums increased $0.2 million or 5%, while total renewal premiums increased $0.3 million or 2%. The increase in new premiums reflects a combination of expanded distribution efforts and improved agency productivity. Old American continues to focus on the recruitment and development of new agencies and agents, along with improved production from existing agencies and agents. In addition, proactive territorial management by agencies and the home office have contributed to the increased sales.
59
Net investment income decreased $0.2 million or 6% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011. This decline was largely due to a reduction in yields available in the market.
Old American had a net realized investment gain before impairment losses of less than $0.1 million for both the first quarters of 2012 and 2011. Write-downs of certain investment securities totaled less than $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2012.
The Companys analysis of securities for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 resulted in the determination that two fixed-maturity securities had an other-than-temporary impairment affecting the Old American segment and were written down by less than $0.1 million. The total fair value of the affected securities after the write-down was $4.1 million.
Please see Consolidated Results of Operations in Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a table that provides securities that were written down through earnings by business segment for the first quarters of 2012 and 2011. This section also contains a table that provides detail regarding individual investment securities by business segment that were written down through earnings during the first quarters of 2012 and 2011.
Policyholder benefits decreased $0.7 million or 5% in the first quarter versus last year. The decrease was largely due to lower death benefits compared with the prior year. Mortality fluctuations occur each period. The Company monitors these fluctuations in relation to its pricing expectations. While death benefits decreased during the first quarter of 2012, the results remained within pricing expectations.
Amortization of DAC was essentially flat in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the same period last year.
Operating expenses decreased $0.9 million or 19% versus last year. The decrease for the first quarter was largely due to increased capitalization of commissions and lower amortization of VOBA. Capitalized commissions increased, largely due to $0.4 million in higher capitalization resulting from the implementation of ASU No. 2010-26, as described in Note 7Change in Accounting Principle. The lower amortization of VOBA is due to the traditional life insurance block being fully amortized at December 31, 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
Statements made in the Companys 2011 Form 10-K remain pertinent, as the Companys liquidity position is materially unchanged from year-end 2011.
Management believes that the Company has sufficient sources of liquidity and capital resources to satisfy operational requirements and to finance expansion plans and strategic initiatives. Primary sources of cash flow are premiums, other insurance considerations and deposits, receipts for policyholder accounts, investment sales and maturities, and investment income. In addition, the Company has credit facilities that are available for additional working capital needs or investment opportunities. The principal uses of cash are for the insurance operations, including the purchase of investments, payment of insurance benefits, operating expenses, policyholder dividends, withdrawals from policyholder accounts, and costs related to acquiring new business. In addition, the Company uses cash for other purposes, including the payment of stockholder dividends and income taxes. There can be no assurance that the Company will continue to generate cash flows at or above current levels or that the ability to borrow under the current credit facilities will be maintained.
The Company performs cash flow testing and adds various levels of stress testing to potential surrender and policy loan levels in order to assess current and near-term cash and liquidity needs. In the event of increased surrenders and other cash needs, the Company has several sources of cash flow, as mentioned above, to meet these needs.
Net cash used for operating activities was $3.7 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2012, compared to net cash provided of $0.4 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2011. This reflected a decrease in investment income received and an increase in commissions and federal income tax paid. These were partially offset by a decrease in claim payments.
Net cash used for investing activities was $14.8 million, up from net cash used of $9.3 million for the same period in 2011. The Companys new investments in fixed maturity and equity securities were $129.3 million for the three months, a 63% increase from $79.1 million in the prior year. New investments in mortgage loans were $11.3 million for the first quarter,
60
compared with $15.5 million last year. Purchases of real estate totaled $2.7 million, down from $2.9 million in 2011. Sales and maturities of fixed maturity and equity securities totaled $46.4 million for the first quarter of 2012, a 38% decrease versus a year ago. Sales of real estate totaled $47.3 million in the first quarter of 2012, while there were no sales in the same quarter of 2011. Mortgage loan maturities and principal payments totaled $39.0 million, compared to $19.9 million last year.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $13.2 million for the first quarter of 2012, compared with net cash provided of $8.3 million a year ago. This change was primarily the result of three items. First, deposits net of related withdrawals from policyholder account balances provided $17.8 million in the first quarter of 2012, compared with $9.6 million during the same period in 2011. Second, net transfers from separate accounts provided $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2012 compared to $0.9 million in the same period in 2011. Partially offsetting the first two items, there was a change in other deposits used of $2.9 million in 2012 compared to $0.9 million in other deposits provided in the first quarter of 2011.
The above information excludes net proceeds from variable insurance products. These proceeds are segregated into separate accounts and are not held in the Companys general investments because the policyholders, rather than the Company, assume the underlying investment risks.
Debt and Short-term Borrowing
The Company and certain subsidiaries have access to borrowing capacity through their membership affiliation with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (FHLB). At March 31, 2012, there were no outstanding balances with the FHLB, and there were no outstanding balances at year-end 2011. The Company has access to unsecured revolving lines of credit of $60.0 million with two major commercial banks with no balances outstanding. These lines of credit will expire on June 30, 2012. The Company anticipates renewing these lines of credit as they come due.
Capital Resources
The Company considers existing capital resources to be adequate to support the current level of business activities. In addition, the Companys statutory equity exceeds the minimum capital deemed necessary to support its insurance business, as determined by the risk-based capital calculations and guidelines established by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. The Company believes these statutory limitations impose no practical restrictions on its dividend payment plans.
The following table shows the capital adequacy for the Company.
March 31 | December 31 | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Total assets, excluding separate accounts |
$ | 4,115,648 | $ | 4,081,633 | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
727,647 | 710,705 | ||||||
Ratio of stockholders equity to assets, excluding separate accounts |
18% | 17% |
The ratio of equity to assets less separate accounts increased from 17% at December 31, 2011 to 18% at March 31, 2012. Unrealized investment gains on available for sale securities, which are included as a part of stockholders equity (net of securities losses, related taxes, policyholder account balances, future policy benefits, and DAC), totaled $81.6 million at March 31, 2012. This represents an increase of $0.5 million in net unrealized gains from the $81.1 million in net unrealized investment gains at year-end 2011. Stockholders equity increased $16.9 million from year-end 2011. This improvement was largely due to growth in retained earnings, primarily driven by the increased net income experienced in the first quarter of 2012.
The stock repurchase program was extended by the Board of Directors through January 27, 2013 to permit the purchase of up to one million of the Companys shares on the open market. The Company made no purchases of stock under this plan in either first quarter of 2012 or 2011.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2012, the employee stock ownership plan purchased 103 shares of treasury stock and sold 215 shares for a net change in treasury stock of less than $0.1 million. The employee stock ownership plan held 27,781 shares of the Companys stock at March 31, 2012.
On April 23, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share, unchanged from the prior year, that will be paid May 9, 2012 to stockholders of record as of May 3, 2012. Total stockholder dividends paid were $3.1 million for both of the quarters ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
61
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In the most recent reporting periods, financial market volatility and liquidity have shown continued improvement. While the improvement has been fairly broad-based, normal market conditions have not yet returned in all sectors or markets. Periods of volatility and market uncertainty represent a heightened risk for all financial institutions. Such events could negatively affect the Company and policyholder activity, such as a reduction in sales, increased policy surrenders, increased policy loans and reduced earnings. The Company has factored these risks into its risk management processes and its disclosures of financial condition.
Please refer to the Companys 2011 Form 10-K for a more complete discussion of quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b), Kansas City Life Insurance Company management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. As required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(d), Kansas City Life Insurance Company management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, also conducted an evaluation of the Companys internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the period covered by this report materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there has been no such change during the period covered by this report.
62
The life insurance industry, including the Company and its subsidiaries, has been subject to an increase in litigation in recent years. Such litigation has been pursued on behalf of purported classes of insurance purchasers, often questioning the conduct of insurers in the marketing of their products.
Similarly, the Companys retail broker-dealer subsidiary is in an industry that also involves substantial risks of liability. In recent years, litigation and arbitration proceedings involving actions against registered representatives and securities products (including mutual funds, variable annuities, and alternative investments, such as real estate investment products and oil and gas investments) have continued to increase. Given the significant decline in the major market indices beginning in 2008, and the generally poor performance of investments that have historically been considered safe and conservative, there is the potential for an increase in the number of proceedings to which a broker-dealer may be named as a party.
In addition to the above, the Company and its subsidiaries are defendants in, or subject to, other claims or legal actions related to insurance and investment products. Some of these claims and legal actions are in jurisdictions where juries are given substantial latitude in assessing damages, including punitive damages.
Although no assurances can be given and no determinations can be made at this time, management believes that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these other claims and legal actions would not have a material effect on the Companys business, results of operations or financial position.
The operating results of life insurance companies have historically been subject to significant fluctuations. The factors which could affect the Companys future results include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions and the known trends and uncertainties are discussed more fully in the Companys Risk Factors included in Part I, Item 1A of the Companys 2011 Form 10-K.
63
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period |
Total Number of Shares Purchased Open Market/ Benefit Plans |
Average Purchase Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as a Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
||||||||||||
1/1/12 - 1/31/12 |
- | 1 | $ | - | - | 1,000,000 | ||||||||||
103 | 2 | 32.82 | ||||||||||||||
2/1/12 - 2/29/12 |
- | 1 | - | - | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||
- | 2 | - | ||||||||||||||
3/1/12 - 3/31/12 |
- | 1 | - | - | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||
- | 2 | - | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
103 | - | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
1 | On January 23, 2012, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock through January 27, 2013. |
2 | Included in this column are the total shares purchased from the employee stock ownership plan sponsored by the Company during the consecutive months of January through March 2012. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
64
3520 Broadway, Kansas City, MO 64111 |
Contact: | Tracy W. Knapp, Chief Financial Officer, | ||
(816) 753-7299, Ext. 8216 |
For Immediate Release: April 27, 2012, press release reporting financial results for the first quarter of 2012.
Kansas City Life Announces First Quarter 2012 Results
Kansas City Life Insurance Company recorded net income of $19.4 million or $1.72 per share in the first quarter of 2012, a $14.7 million or $1.30 per share increase relative to the same quarter in the prior year. The increase in earnings was primarily due to an increase in realized investment gains, largely from the sale of several real estate properties during the first quarter of 2012. Net realized investment gains totaled $15.7 million in the first quarter, an increase of $14.9 million over the first quarter of 2011. In addition, reduced policyholder benefits, amortization of deferred acquisition costs, and operating expenses also significantly contributed to the improved earnings results.
Insurance revenues declined $2.0 million or 3% in the first quarter of 2012, largely due to lower sales of immediate annuities. Partially offsetting the reduced sales of these fixed-rate annuity products, renewal premiums increased $1.8 million. The improvement in renewal premiums reflected increases in individual life and group accident and health product revenues. Both new and renewal premiums increased at Old American, providing an overall improvement in insurance revenues of $0.6 million or 4% for this segment.
Deposits on the Companys interest sensitive products increased $4.0 million or 7% versus the prior year. This was largely the result of a $4.3 million or 29% increase in new fixed deferred annuity deposits. In addition, new universal life deposits increased $0.5 million or 17%. Partially offsetting these changes, total renewal deposits decreased $0.8 million or 2%.
Total investment revenues, which includes net investment income and net realized investment gains and losses, increased $13.7 million or 30% compared with the prior year. This improvement resulted from a $14.9 million increase in net realized investment gains. The gains were primarily driven by the sale of several real estate interests, which generated net realized gains of $15.2 million. The Company has a long history of investing in real estate, and approximately 3% of investments were in this asset class at March 31, 2012. The increased gains were partially offset by a reduction in net investment income of $1.2 million or 3% compared with the prior year. The decrease in net investment income was primarily the result of a decrease in yield on the Companys securities portfolio.
Policyholder benefits declined $6.8 million or 15% for the first quarter of 2012 compared with the same period one year earlier. This decrease was largely the result of an improvement in mortality for the period. In addition, group accident and health benefits declined, largely due to reduced policyholder benefits on dental products.
The amortization of deferred acquisition costs decreased $1.7 million or 18% in the first quarter compared with the prior year. This decrease was largely the result of reduced amortization on variable products, primarily due to improved equity market performance and full amortization of a significant volume of policies in 2011.
Finally, operating expenses decreased $1.9 million or 7% in the first quarter of 2012 versus the prior year. This decrease was largely the result of a decline in employee benefits and lower charge-offs on agent receivables.
On April 23, 2012, the Kansas City Life Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share that will be paid on May 9, 2012 to stockholders of record on May 3, 2012.
Kansas City Life Insurance Company (NASDAQ: KCLI) was established in 1895 and is based in Kansas City, Missouri. The Companys primary business is providing financial protection through the sale of life insurance and annuities. The Companys revenues were $419.0 million in 2011, and assets and life insurance in force were $4.4 billion and $29.2 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2011. The Company operates in 49 states and the District of Columbia. For more information, please visit www.kclife.com.
65
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Condensed Consolidated Income Statement (Unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except share data)
Quarter Ended March 31 |
||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Revenues |
$ | 119,908 | $ | 108,459 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income |
$ | 19,441 | $ | 4,791 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income per share, basic and diluted |
$ | 1.72 | $ | 0.42 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Dividends paid |
$ | 0.27 | $ | 0.27 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Average number of shares outstanding |
11,309,395 | 11,467,208 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
66
(a) | Exhibits |
Exhibit Number: |
||
31(a) | Section 302 Certification. | |
31(b) | Section 302 Certification. | |
32 | Section 1350 Certification. | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
67
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
KANSAS CITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (Registrant) |
/s/ R. Philip Bixby |
R. Philip Bixby |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |
/s/ Tracy W. Knapp |
Tracy W. Knapp |
Senior Vice President, Finance |
Date: April 27, 2012
68