Edgar Filing: KANSAS CITY LIFE INSURANCE CO

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 or

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 2-40764

KANSAS CITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Missouri		44-0308260
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3520 Broadway, Kansas City, Missouri		64111-2565
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

816-753-7000

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer ¨		Accelerated filer x		Non-accelerated filer ¨		Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Common Stock, $1.25 par		11,056,933 shares
Class		Outstanding June 30, 2012

KANSAS CITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Part I. Financial Information			3

Item 1. Financial Statements			3

Consolidated Balance Sheets			3

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income			4

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity			5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows			6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)			8

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			41

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			72

Item 4. Controls and Procedures			72

Part II: Other Information			73

Item 1. Legal Proceedings			73

Item 1A. Risk Factors			73

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			74

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			74

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures			74

Item 5. Other Information			75

Item 6. Exhibits			77

Signatures			78

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Amounts in thousands, except share data, or as otherwise noted

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Consolidated Balance Sheets


	June 30 2012			December 31 2011
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value	$	2,816,250		$	2,682,142
Equity securities available for sale, at fair value		37,184			36,689
Mortgage loans		579,500			601,923
Real estate		123,450			127,962
Policy loans		79,447			80,375
Short-term investments		17,448			49,316
Other investments		2,865			3,364

Total investments		3,656,144			3,581,771

Cash		5,573			10,436
Accrued investment income		35,784			34,705
Deferred acquisition costs		178,911			181,564
Reinsurance receivables		194,028			189,885
Property and equipment		22,178			22,671
Other assets		51,180			60,601
Separate account assets		320,566			316,609

Total assets	$	4,464,364		$	4,398,242


LIABILITIES
Future policy benefits	$	886,077		$	879,015
Policyholder account balances		2,114,159			2,089,452
Policy and contract claims		32,152			36,511
Other policyholder funds		152,124			152,125
Other liabilities		222,254			213,825
Separate account liabilities		320,566			316,609

Total liabilities		3,727,332			3,687,537


STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, par value $1.25 per share
Authorized 36,000,000 shares, issued 18,496,680 shares		23,121			23,121
Additional paid in capital		41,106			41,101
Retained earnings		802,652			780,918
Accumulated other comprehensive income		42,916			30,086
Treasury stock, at cost (2012 - 7,439,747 shares; 2011 - 7,187,315 shares)		(172,763	)		(164,521	)

Total stockholders’ equity		737,032			710,705

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,464,364		$	4,398,242

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income


	Quarter Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
REVENUES
Insurance revenues:
Premiums, net	$	34,205		$	30,801		$	66,909		$	64,426
Contract charges		25,590			23,752			50,723			49,986

Total insurance revenues		59,795			54,553			117,632			114,412
Investment revenues:
Net investment income		43,435			44,893			87,644			90,284
Net realized investment gains, excluding impairment losses		1,361			1,893			17,198			2,905
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings:
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses		(188	)		(238	)		(456	)		(507	)
Portion of impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive income		42			56			150			114

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings		(146	)		(182	)		(306	)		(393	)

Total investment revenues		44,650			46,604			104,536			92,796
Other revenues		2,312			2,666			4,497			5,074

Total revenues		106,757			103,823			226,665			212,282


BENEFITS AND EXPENSES
Policyholder benefits		41,276			38,865			79,746			84,139
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		20,377			20,766			40,935			41,247
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs		5,121			705			13,022			10,289
Operating expenses		27,078			26,498			51,040			52,363

Total benefits and expenses		93,852			86,834			184,743			188,038

Income before income tax expense		12,905			16,989			41,922			24,244
Income tax expense		4,508			5,816			14,084			8,280


NET INCOME	$	8,397		$	11,173		$	27,838		$	15,964


COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, NET OF TAXES
Change in net unrealized gains on securities available for sale	$	15,925		$	19,802		$	18,017		$	19,178
Change in future policy benefits		(3,502	)		(2,926	)		(4,969	)		(2,206	)
Change in policyholder account balances		(143	)		(83	)		(218	)		(77	)

Other comprehensive income		12,280			16,793			12,830			16,895


COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$	20,677		$	27,966		$	40,668		$	32,859


Basic and diluted earnings per share:
Net income	$	0.78		$	0.97		$	2.50		$	1.39

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
	(Unaudited)
COMMON STOCK, beginning and end of period	$	23,121


ADDITIONAL PAID IN CAPITAL
Beginning of period		41,101
Excess of proceeds over cost of treasury stock sold		5


End of period		41,106


RETAINED EARNINGS
Beginning of period		780,918
Net income		27,838
Stockholder dividends of $0.54 per share		(6,104	)


End of period		802,652


ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME, net of taxes
Beginning of period		30,086
Other comprehensive income		12,830


End of period		42,916


TREASURY STOCK, at cost
Beginning of period		(164,521	)
Cost of 82,825 shares acquired		(2,668	)
Cost of 19,014 shares sold		616
Immaterial correction (See Note 1)		(6,190	)


End of period		(172,763	)


TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	737,032

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


	Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			2011
	(Unaudited)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	27,838		$	15,964
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Amortization of investment premium and discount		1,977			1,656
Depreciation		1,643			1,468
Acquisition costs capitalized		(18,991	)		(17,998	)
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs		13,022			10,289
Realized investment gains		(16,892	)		(2,512	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Reinsurance receivables		(4,143	)		(1,485	)
Future policy benefits		(583	)		(6,249	)
Policyholder account balances		(4,739	)		(5,916	)
Income taxes payable and deferred		2,639			3,468
Other, net		(3,754	)		4,859

Net cash (used) provided		(1,983	)		3,544


INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases:
Fixed maturity securities		(192,935	)		(102,576	)
Equity securities		(728	)		(1,398	)
Mortgage loans		(30,691	)		(105,223	)
Real estate		(28,845	)		(4,514	)
Policy loans		(7,419	)		(6,970	)
Sales or maturities, calls, and principal paydowns:
Fixed maturity securities		96,448			172,383
Equity securities		179			214
Mortgage loans		52,510			39,111
Real estate		49,164			-
Policy loans		8,347			9,079
Net sales (purchases) of short-term investments		31,868			(20,978	)
Net acquisitions of property and equipment		(142	)		(71	)

Net cash used		(22,244	)		(20,943	)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


	Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			2011
	(Unaudited)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Deposits on policyholder account balances	$	116,859		$	121,982
Withdrawals from policyholder account balances		(86,715	)		(99,840	)
Net transfers from separate accounts		2,099			2,134
Change in other deposits		(4,728	)		164
Cash dividends to stockholders		(6,104	)		(6,191	)
Net change in treasury stock		(2,047	)		(6	)

Net cash provided		19,364			18,243


Increase (decrease) in cash		(4,863	)		844
Cash at beginning of year		10,436			5,445

Cash at end of period	$	5,573		$	6,289


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Income taxes	$	10,500		$	6,257

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes include the accounts of the consolidated entity (the Company), which primarily consists of three life insurance companies. Kansas City Life Insurance Company (Kansas City Life) is the parent company. Sunset Life Insurance Company of America (Sunset Life) and Old American Insurance Company (Old American) are wholly-owned subsidiaries.

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial reporting and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulations S-K, S-X, and other applicable regulations. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. As such, these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, and all normal and recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position at June 30, 2012 and the results of operations for all periods presented have been made. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the Company’s operating results for a full year. Significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation and certain immaterial reclassifications have been made to prior period results to conform with the current period’s presentation.

The preparation of the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates are inherently subject to change and actual results could differ from these estimates.

Immaterial Correction of Errors

During the second quarter of 2012, the Company identified an error in the presentation of treasury stock held for the benefit of the Company’s deferred compensation plans. This treasury stock was previously recorded as a component of other assets but should have been recorded in stockholders’ equity as treasury stock. Accordingly, the Company reclassified $6.2 million (188,621 shares) from other assets to treasury stock. This error had no material impact on net income in the current or prior reporting periods.

During the first quarter of 2012, the Company identified an error related to the amortization period for unrecognized actuarial gains and losses for its pension plan resulting in a reduction to net periodic pension expense of $2.0 million before applicable income taxes and an after-tax increase of $1.3 million to net income and stockholders’ equity. The excess amortization had been previously recorded during 2011. Please refer to Note 11 – Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits for additional information.

During 2011, the Company identified errors related to the classification of amounts reported in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The Company has revised the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The changes resulted in a decrease of $0.9 million to cash flows from operating activities and an increase of the same amount to cash flows from financing activities. This change did not impact net income, the balance sheet, or stockholders’ equity for the period.

Management has evaluated these errors both quantitatively and qualitatively, and concluded that these corrections were not material to the consolidated financial statements.

Significant Accounting Policies

No significant updates or changes to these policies occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

For a full discussion of these significant accounting policies, please refer to the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

2. New Accounting Pronouncements

For a full discussion of new accounting pronouncements and other regulatory activity and their impact on the Company, please refer to the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K.

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During 2012

In October 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance that modifies the types of costs incurred by insurance entities that can be capitalized when issuing or renewing insurance contracts. The guidance defines allowable deferred acquisition costs as incremental or directly related to the successful acquisition of new or renewal contracts. In addition, certain costs related directly to acquisition activities performed by the insurer, such as underwriting and policy issuance, are also deferrable. This guidance also defines the considerations for the deferral of direct-response advertising costs. This guidance became effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with either prospective or retrospective application permitted. The Company adopted this new guidance prospectively on January 1, 2012. Please refer to Note 7 – Change in Accounting Principle for additional information.

In May 2011, the FASB issued new guidance concerning fair value measurements and disclosure. The new guidance is the result of joint efforts by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to develop a single, converged fair value framework on how to measure fair value and the necessary disclosures concerning fair value measurements. The guidance became effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this new guidance on January 1, 2012 with no material impact to the consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance regarding the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in the financial statements. This guidance removes the previous presentation options and provides that entities must report comprehensive income in either a continuous statement of comprehensive income or two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance also includes the requirement for reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income to be presented on the face of the financial statements. This guidance does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income nor does it require any disclosures in addition to those previously required. In December 2011, the FASB deferred the effective date for amendments to the presentation of reclassification adjustments. The guidance became effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this new guidance on January 1, 2012 with no material impact to the consolidated financial statements.

All other new accounting standards and updates of existing standards issued through the date of this filing were considered by management and did not relate to accounting policies and procedures pertinent to the Company at this time.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

3. Investments

Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Available for Sale

Securities by Asset Class

The following table provides amortized cost and fair value of securities by asset class at June 30, 2012.


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized				Fair Value
	Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government	$	121,606	$	14,308	$	22	$	135,892
Federal agencies ¹		22,063		4,061		1		26,123
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities ¹		97,158		9,281		-		106,439

Subtotal		240,827		27,650		23		268,454
Corporate obligations:
Industrial		498,231		48,437		1,727		544,941
Energy		173,030		20,692		46		193,676
Communications and technology		199,416		20,097		28		219,485
Financial		298,693		20,753		2,624		316,822
Consumer		488,138		47,467		53		535,552
Public utilities		253,931		39,068		485		292,514

Subtotal		1,911,439		196,514		4,963		2,102,990
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities		157,621		2,711		8,694		151,638
Municipal securities		148,664		25,510		26		174,148
Other		106,488		4,771		8,081		103,178
Redeemable preferred stocks		15,736		328		222		15,842

Fixed maturity securities		2,580,775		257,484		22,009		2,816,250
Equity securities		35,499		1,815		130		37,184

Total	$	2,616,274	$	259,299	$	22,139	$	2,853,434

¹	Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The following table provides amortized cost and fair value of securities by asset class at December 31, 2011.


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized				Fair Value
	Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government	$	120,593	$	13,856	$	12	$	134,437
Federal agencies ¹		22,401		3,480		-		25,881
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities ¹		109,738		9,901		2		119,637

Subtotal		252,732		27,237		14		279,955
Corporate obligations:
Industrial		444,030		43,710		860		486,880
Energy		152,580		19,131		-		171,711
Communications and technology		184,983		16,566		156		201,393
Financial		308,813		15,155		5,890		318,078
Consumer		452,962		43,788		263		496,487
Public utilities		259,609		38,094		1,366		296,337

Subtotal		1,802,977		176,444		8,535		1,970,886
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities		167,666		1,856		12,620		156,902
Municipal securities		150,267		18,316		61		168,522
Other		100,315		3,576		9,235		94,656
Redeemable preferred stocks		11,735		226		740		11,221

Fixed maturity securities		2,485,692		227,655		31,205		2,682,142
Equity securities		34,951		1,873		135		36,689

Total	$	2,520,643	$	229,528	$	31,340	$	2,718,831

¹	Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

Contractual Maturities

The following table provides the distribution of maturities for fixed maturity securities available for sale at June 30, 2012. Expected maturities may differ from these contractual maturities since borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.


	June 30, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	99,536	$	101,304
Due after one year through five years		619,948		665,859
Due after five years through ten years		1,035,701		1,151,964
Due after ten years		474,696		532,021
Securities with variable principal payments		335,158		349,260
Redeemable preferred stocks		15,736		15,842

	$	2,580,775	$	2,816,250

Unrealized Losses on Investments

The Company reviews all security investments, with particular attention given to those having unrealized losses. Further, the Company specifically assesses all investments with greater than 10% declines in fair value below amortized cost and, in general, monitors all security investments as to ongoing risk. These risks are fundamentally evaluated through both a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the issuer. The Company also prepares a formal review document no less often than quarterly of all investments where fair value is less than 80% of amortized cost for six months or more and selected investments that have changed significantly from a previous period and that have a decline in fair value greater than 10% of amortized cost.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The Company has a policy and process in place to identify securities that could potentially have an impairment that is other-than-temporary (OTTI). This process involves monitoring market events and other items that could impact issuers. The Company considers relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating whether the impairment of a security is other-than-temporary. Relevant facts and circumstances considered are described in the Valuation of Investments section of Note 1 – Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies of the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K.

To the extent the Company determines that a fixed maturity security is deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, the portion of the impairment that is deemed to be due to credit is charged to the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and the cost basis of the underlying investment is reduced. The portion of such impairment that is determined to be non-credit-related is deducted from net realized loss in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and is reflected in other comprehensive income and accumulated other comprehensive income.

There are a number of significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the process of monitoring impairments, determining if an impairment is other-than-temporary and determining the portion of an other-than-temporary impairment that is due to credit. These risks and uncertainties are described in the Valuation of Investments section of Note 1 of the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K.

Once a security is determined to have met certain of the criteria for consideration as being other-than-temporarily impaired, further information is gathered and evaluated pertaining to the particular security. If the security is an unsecured obligation, the additional research is a top-down approach with particular emphasis on the likelihood of the issuer to meet the contractual terms of the obligation. If the security is secured by an asset or guaranteed by another party, the value of the underlying secured asset or the financial ability of the third-party guarantor is evaluated as a secondary source of repayment. Such research is based upon a top-down approach, narrowing to the specific estimates of value and cash flow of the underlying secured asset or guarantor. If the security is a collateralized obligation, such as a mortgage-backed or other asset-backed instrument, research is also conducted to obtain and analyze the performance of the collateral relative to expectations at the time of acquisition and with regard to projections for the future. Such analyses are based upon historical results, trends, comparisons to collateral performance of similar securities, and analyses performed by third parties. This information is used to develop projected cash flows that are compared to the amortized cost of the security.

If a determination is made that an unsecured security, secured security, or security with a guaranty of payment by a third-party is other-than-temporarily impaired, an estimate is developed of the portion of such impairment that is due to credit. The estimate of the portion of impairment due to credit is based upon a comparison of ratings and maturity horizon for the security and relative historical default probabilities from one or more nationally recognized rating organizations. When appropriate for any given security, sector or period in the business cycle, the historical default probability is adjusted to reflect periods or situations of distress by adding to the default probability increments of standard deviations from mean historical results. The credit impairment analysis is supplemented by estimates of potential recovery values for the specific security, including the potential impact of the value of any secured assets, in the event of default. This information is used to determine the Company’s best estimate, derived from probability-weighted cash flows.

The evaluation of loan-backed and similar asset-backed securities, particularly including residential mortgage-backed securities, with significant indications of potential other-than-temporary impairment requires considerable use of estimates and judgment. Specifically, the Company performs discounted cash flow projections on these securities to evaluate whether the value of the investment is expected to be fully realized. Projections of expected future cash flows are based upon considerations of the performance of the actual underlying assets, including historical delinquencies, defaults, severity of losses incurred, and prepayments, along with the Company’s estimates of future results for these factors. The Company’s estimates of future results are based upon actual historical performance of the underlying assets relative to historical, current and expected general economic conditions, specific conditions related to the underlying assets, industry data, and other factors that are believed to be relevant. If the present value of the projected expected future cash flows is determined to be below the Company’s carrying value, the Company recognizes an other-than-temporary impairment on the portion of the carrying value that exceeds the projected expected future cash flows. To the extent that the loan-backed or other asset-backed securities were high quality investments at the time of acquisition, and they remain high quality investments and do not otherwise demonstrate characteristics of impairment, the Company performs other initial evaluations to determine whether other-than-temporary cash flow evaluations need to be performed.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The discounted future cash flow calculation typically becomes the primary determinant of whether any portion and to what extent an unrealized loss is due to credit on loan-backed and similar asset-backed securities with significant indications of potential other-than-temporary impairment. Such indications typically include below investment grade ratings and significant unrealized losses for an extended period of time, among other factors. The Company identified 17 non-U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities that had such indications at both June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The discount rate used in calculating the present value of future cash flows was the investment yield at the time of purchase for each security. The initial default rates were assumed to remain constant over a 24-month time frame and grade down thereafter, reflecting the general perspective of a more stabilized residential housing environment in the future.

For loan-backed and similar asset-backed securities, the determination of any amount of impairment that is due to credit is based upon the present value of projected future cash flows being less than the amortized cost of the security. This amount is recognized as a realized loss in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and the carrying value of the security is written down by the same amount. The portion of an impairment that is determined not to be due to credit is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

As part of the required accounting for unrealized gains and losses, the Company also adjusts the deferred acquisition costs (DAC) and value of business acquired (VOBA) assets to recognize the adjustment to those assets as if the unrealized gains and losses from securities classified as available for sale actually had been realized.

The following table provides information regarding fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale with unrealized losses by length of time at June 30, 2012.


	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government	$	900	$	8	$	779	$	14	$	1,679	$	22
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities ¹		333		-		293		1		626		1

Subtotal		1,233		8		1,072		15		2,305		23
Corporate obligations:
Industrial		24,733		1,727		-		-		24,733		1,727
Energy		9,580		46		-		-		9,580		46
Communications and technology		4,053		28		-		-		4,053		28
Financial		17,959		258		15,610		2,366		33,569		2,624
Consumer		14,480		46		587		7		15,067		53
Public utilities		9,236		74		6,740		411		15,976		485

Subtotal		80,041		2,179		22,937		2,784		102,978		4,963
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities		-		-		70,210		8,694		70,210		8,694
Municipal securities		3,078		18		893		8		3,971		26
Other		-		-		45,185		8,081		45,185		8,081
Redeemable preferred stocks		-		-		3,460		222		3,460		222

Fixed maturity securities		84,352		2,205		143,757		19,804		228,109		22,009

Equity securities		-		-		1,127		130		1,127		130

Total	$	84,352	$	2,205	$	144,884	$	19,934	$	229,236	$	22,139

¹	Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The following table provides information regarding fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale with unrealized losses by length of time at December 31, 2011.


	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government	$	-	$	-	$	959	$	12	$	959	$	12
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities ¹		649		-		294		2		943		2

Subtotal		649		-		1,253		14		1,902		14
Corporate obligations:
Industrial		25,455		860		-		-		25,455		860
Communications and technology		7,239		156		-		-		7,239		156
Financial		51,273		2,107		16,402		3,783		67,675		5,890
Consumer		11,765		119		3,689		144		15,454		263
Public utilities		4,710		344		11,152		1,022		15,862		1,366

Subtotal		100,442		3,586		31,243		4,949		131,685		8,535
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities		41,734		2,668		61,864		9,952		103,598		12,620
Municipal securities		-		-		3,909		61		3,909		61
Other		9,257		921		47,146		8,314		56,403		9,235
Redeemable preferred stocks		2,939		115		3,056		625		5,995		740

Fixed maturity securities		155,021		7,290		148,471		23,915		303,492		31,205

Equity securities		69		104		1,054		31		1,123		135

Total	$	155,090	$	7,394	$	149,525	$	23,946	$	304,615	$	31,340

¹	Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

In addition, the Company also considers as part of its monitoring and evaluation process the length of time the fair value of a security is below amortized cost. At June 30, 2012, the Company had 65 issues in its investment portfolio of fixed maturity and equity securities with unrealized losses. Included in this total, 30 security issues were below cost for less than one year; six security issues were below cost for one year or more and less than three years; and 29 security issues were below cost for three years or more. At December 31, 2011, the Company had 85 issues in its investment portfolio of fixed maturity and equity securities with unrealized losses. Included in this total, 46 security issues were below cost for less than one year; 10 security issues were below cost for one year or more and less than three years; and 29 security issues were below cost for three years or more.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The following table provides the distribution of maturities for fixed maturity securities available for sale with unrealized losses at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Expected maturities may differ from these contractual maturities since borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.


	June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Fixed maturity security securities available for sale:
Due in one year or less	$	919	$	8	$	2,953	$	48
Due after one year through five years		32,871		491		42,416		2,120
Due after five years through ten years		60,008		2,636		64,772		2,616
Due after ten years		60,015		9,958		82,816		13,061

Total		153,813		13,093		192,957		17,845
Securities with variable principal payments		70,836		8,694		104,540		12,620
Redeemable preferred stocks		3,460		222		5,995		740

Total	$	228,109	$	22,009	$	303,492	$	31,205

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The following table provides a reconciliation of credit losses recognized in earnings on fixed maturity securities held by the Company for which a portion of the other-than-temporary loss was recognized in other comprehensive income.


	Quarter Ended June 30			Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			2012
Credit losses on securities held at beginning of the period in accumulated other comprehensive income	$	13,715		$	13,559
Additions for credit losses not previously recognized in other-than-temporary impairment		1			29
Additions for increases in the credit loss for which an other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized when there was no intent to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis		145			277
Reductions for securities sold during the period (realized)		-			-
Reductions for securities previously recognized in other comprehensive income because of intent to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis		-			-
Reductions for increases in cash flows expected to be collected that are recognized over the remaining life of the security		(4	)		(8	)

Credit losses on securities held at the end of the period in accumulated other comprehensive income	$	13,857		$	13,857

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

Realized Gains (Losses)

The following table provides detail concerning realized investment gains and losses for the second quarters and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.


	Quarter Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Gross gains resulting from:
Sales of investment securities	$	-		$	3,341		$	313		$	3,652
Investment securities called and other		595			387			803			1,250
Sales of real estate		1,010			-			16,180			-

Total gross gains		1,605			3,728			17,296			4,902

Gross losses resulting from:
Sales of investment securities		(32	)		(1,590	)		(32	)		(1,590	)
Investment securities called and other		(151	)		(125	)		(204	)		(179	)
Mortgage loans		(13	)		-			(178	)		(3	)

Total gross losses		(196	)		(1,715	)		(414	)		(1,772	)
Change in allowance for potential future losses on mortgage loans		(32	)		-			332			-
Amortization of DAC and VOBA		(16	)		(120	)		(16	)		(225	)

Net realized investment gains, excluding impairment losses		1,361			1,893			17,198			2,905

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings:
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses		(188	)		(238	)		(456	)		(507	)
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income		42			56			150			114

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings		(146	)		(182	)		(306	)		(393	)

Net realized investment gains	$	1,215		$	1,711		$	16,892		$	2,512

Proceeds From Sales of Investment Securities

The table below provides information regarding sales of fixed maturity and equity securities, excluding maturities and calls, for the second quarters and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.


	Quarter Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Proceeds	$	2,216		$	41,398		$	8,616		$	51,541
Gross realized gains		-			3,341			313			3,652
Gross realized losses		(32	)		(1,590	)		(32	)		(1,590	)

Mortgage Loans

The Company invests on an ongoing basis in commercial mortgage loans that are secured by commercial real estate and are stated at cost, adjusted for amortization of premium and accrual of discount, less an allowance for potential future losses. This allowance is maintained at a level believed by management to be adequate to absorb estimated credit losses and was $2.5 million at June 30, 2012 and $2.8 million at December 31, 2011. The Company had 16% of its invested assets in commercial mortgage loans at June 30, 2012, compared to 17% at December 31, 2011. In addition to the subject collateral underlying the mortgage, the Company typically requires some amount of recourse from borrowers as another potential source of repayment. The recourse requirement is determined as part of the underwriting requirements of each loan. The average loan to value ratio for the overall portfolio was 45% and 46% at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and is based upon the appraisal of value at the time the loan was originated or acquired.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The following table identifies the gross mortgage loan principal outstanding and the allowance for potential future losses at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


	June 30 2012			December 31 2011
Principal outstanding	$	582,017		$	604,772
Allowance for potential future losses		(2,517	)		(2,849	)

Carrying value	$	579,500		$	601,923

The following table summarizes the amount of mortgage loans held by the Company at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, segregated by year of origination. Purchased loans are shown in the year acquired by the Company, although the individual loans may have been initially originated in prior years.


	June 30 2012		% of Total		December 31 2011		% of Total
Prior to 2002	$	22,216		4%	$	28,437		5%
2003		35,236		6%		42,112		7%
2004		28,473		5%		29,966		5%
2005		52,462		9%		54,802		9%
2006		40,594		7%		42,676		7%
2007		34,600		6%		35,323		6%
2008		38,504		7%		44,285		7%
2009		48,268		8%		50,574		8%
2010		106,816		18%		133,684		22%
2011		136,784		23%		142,913		24%
2012		38,064		7%		-		-

	$	582,017		100%	$	604,772		100%

The following table identifies mortgage loans by geographic location at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


	June 30 2012		% of Total		December 31 2011		% of Total
Pacific	$	133,619		23%	$	138,529		23%
West north central		106,095		18%		130,481		22%
West south central		106,996		18%		98,036		16%
Mountain		85,285		15%		82,029		14%
South atlantic		59,980		10%		63,125		10%
Middle atlantic		41,016		7%		42,112		7%
East north central		30,462		5%		30,482		5%
East south central		18,564		4%		19,978		3%

	$	582,017		100%	$	604,772		100%

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The following table identifies mortgage loans by property type at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The Other category consists of apartments and retail properties.


	June 30 2012		% Total		December 31 2011		% Total
Industrial	$	248,332		43%	$	251,839		42%
Office		231,643		40%		243,885		40%
Medical		42,066		7%		43,089		7%
Other		59,976		10%		65,959		11%

	$	582,017		100%	$	604,772		100%

The following table identifies the concentration of mortgage loans by state greater than 5% at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


	June 30 2012		% of Total		December 31 2011		% of Total
California	$	113,231		19%	$	117,261		19%
Texas		94,021		16%		84,724		14%
Minnesota		63,962		11%		64,952		11%
Florida		33,292		6%		31,310		5%
All others		277,511		48%		306,525		51%

	$	582,017		100%	$	604,772		100%

The table below identifies the carrying amount of mortgage loans by maturity at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


	June 30 2012		% of Total		December 31 2011		% of Total
Due in one year or less	$	5,572		1%	$	2,356		-
Due after one year through five years		181,974		32%		153,822		25%
Due after five years through ten years		235,378		40%		255,615		42%
Due after ten years		159,093		27%		192,979		33%

	$	582,017		100%	$	604,772		100%

The Company may refinance commercial mortgage loans prior to contractual maturity as a means of originating new loans that meet the Company’s underwriting and pricing parameters. The Company refinanced loans with outstanding balances of $4.0 million and $1.9 million during the second quarters of 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $8.6 million and $9.7 million during the first six months of 2012 and 2011, respectively.

In the normal course of business, the Company commits to fund commercial mortgage loans generally up to 120 days in advance. These commitments generally have fixed expiration dates. A small percentage of commitments expire due to the borrower’s failure to deliver the requirements of the commitment by the expiration date. In these cases, the Company retains the commitment fee. For additional information, please see Note 16 – Commitments.

At June 30, 2012, the Company had a construction-to-permanent loan commitment in the amount of $2.8 million, and $2.5 million had been disbursed on this loan. At completion and fulfillment of occupancy requirements, the construction loan will convert to a long-term, fixed-rate permanent loan.

4. Fair Value Measurements

Under GAAP, fair value represents the price that would be received to sell an asset (exit price) or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It is the Company’s policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The Company categorizes its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the inputs and assumptions used to determine the fair value. These levels are as follows:

Level 1 – Valuations are based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

Level 2 – Valuations are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. Valuations are obtained from third-party pricing services or inputs that are observable or derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 – Valuations are generated from techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company’s assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include the use of discounted cash flow models, spread-based models, and similar techniques, using the best information available in the circumstances.

Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value and for estimating fair value for financial instruments not recorded at fair value but for which fair value is disclosed.

Assets

Securities Available for Sale

Fixed maturity and equity securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon unadjusted quoted prices, if available, except as described in the subsequent paragraphs.

Short-Term Financial Assets

Short-term financial assets include cash and other short-term assets. Cash is categorized as Level 1. Other short-term assets are invested in institutional money market funds. These assets are categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy, as the valuation is based upon the net asset value (NAV) of the fund.

Loans

The Company does not record loans at fair value. As such, valuation techniques discussed herein for loans are primarily for estimating fair value for purpose of disclosure.

Fair values of mortgage loans on real estate properties are calculated by discounting contractual cash flows, using discount rates based on current industry pricing or the Company’s estimate of an appropriate risk-adjusted discount rate for loans of similar size, type, remaining maturity, likelihood of prepayment, and repricing characteristics. Mortgage loans are categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

The Company also has loans made to policyholders. These loans cannot exceed the cash surrender value of the policy. Carrying value of policy loans approximates fair value. Policy loans are categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

Separate Accounts

The separate account assets and liabilities, which are equal, are recorded at fair value based upon NAV. They are categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy, as the Company receives independent prices from external pricing sources to determine the fair value.

Liabilities

Investment-Type Liabilities Included in Policyholder Account Balances and Other Policyholder Funds

Fair values for liabilities under investment-type insurance contracts are based upon account value. The fair values of investment-type insurance contracts included with policyholder account balances for fixed deferred annuities are estimated to be their cash surrender values. The fair values of supplementary contracts without life contingencies are estimated to be the present value of payments using a market yield. The fair values of deposits with no stated maturity are estimated to be the amount payable on demand at the measurement date. These liabilities are categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefits (GMWB)

The Company offers a GMWB rider that can be added to new or existing variable annuity contracts. The rider provides an enhanced withdrawal benefit that guarantees a stream of income payments to an owner or annuitant, regardless of the contract account value. Fair value for GMWB rider contracts is a Level 3 valuation, as it is based on models which utilize significant unobservable inputs. These models require actuarial and financial market assumptions, which reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the contract, including adjustments for volatility, risk, and issuer non-performance.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

Notes Payable

Fair values for short-term notes payable approximate their carrying value. The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of the fair value because of the relatively short time between the origination of the loan and its expected repayment.

Determination of Fair Value

The determination of the fair value of the Company’s fixed maturity and equity securities is the responsibility of the Company’s investment accounting group, which reports to the Principal Accounting Officer. This group manages and creates the policies and processes used to determine the fair value for these assets. This group employs third-party pricing services and obtains selected support from the Company’s portfolio managers in order to achieve results for this multi-tiered process. All prices are reviewed by the investment accounting group. The financial reporting group, the Principal Accounting Officer, and the Chief Financial Officer also review the fair value methodologies and the fair values that are obtained each quarter. The results of those reviews are made known to the Company’s Disclosure Committee and to the Company’s Audit Committee. In addition, any significant policy or process changes made during the quarter are also discussed with the Company’s Audit Committee.

The Company utilizes external independent third-party pricing services to determine the majority of its fair values on investment securities available for sale. At June 30, 2012, 96% of the carrying value of these investments was from external pricing services, 2% was from brokers, and 2% was derived from internal matrices and calculations. In the event that the primary pricing service does not provide a price, the Company utilizes the price provided by a second pricing service. The Company reviews prices received from service providers for reasonableness and unusual fluctuations but generally accepts the price identified from the primary pricing service. In the event that a price is not available from either third-party pricing service, the Company pursues external pricing from brokers. Generally, the Company pursues and utilizes only one broker quote per security. In doing so, the Company solicits only brokers which have previously demonstrated knowledge and experience of the subject security. If a broker price is not available, the Company determines a fair value through various valuation techniques that may include discounted cash flows, spread-based models, or similar techniques, depending upon the specific security to be priced. These techniques are primarily applied to private placement securities. The Company utilizes available market information, wherever possible, to identify inputs into the fair value determination, primarily including prices and spreads on comparable securities. In total, the Company internally determined the prices for 20 securities at June 30, 2012. The Company also obtained prices for seven securities from brokers.

Each quarter, the Company evaluates the prices received from third-party security pricing services and independent brokers to ensure that the prices represent a reasonable estimate of the fair value within the macro-economic environment, sector factors, and overall pricing trends and expectations. The Company corroborates and validates the primary pricing sources through a variety of procedures that include but are not limited to comparison to additional independent third-party pricing services or brokers, where possible; a review of third-party pricing service methodologies; back testing; and comparison of prices to actual trades for specific securities where observable data exists. In addition, the Company analyzes the primary third-party pricing service’s methodologies and related inputs and also evaluates the various types of securities in its investment portfolio to determine an appropriate fair value hierarchy. Finally, the Company also performs additional evaluations when individual prices fall outside tolerance levels for prices received from third-party pricing services.

Fair value measurements for assets and liabilities where there exists limited or no observable market data are calculated using the Company’s own estimates and are categorized as Level 3. These estimates are based on current interest rates, credit spreads, liquidity premium or discount, the economic and competitive environment, unique characteristics of the asset or liability, and other pertinent factors. Therefore, these estimates cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability. Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in any valuation technique. Further, changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results of current or future values.

The Company’s own estimates of fair value of fixed maturity and equity securities are derived in a number of ways, including but not limited to: 1) pricing provided by brokers, where the price indicates reliability as to value; 2) fair values of comparable securities, incorporating a spread adjustment for maturity differences, collateralization, credit quality, liquidity, and other items, if applicable; 3) discounted cash flow models and margin spreads; 4) bond yield curves; 5) observable market prices and exchange transaction information not provided by external pricing services; and 6) statement values provided to the Company by fund managers.

The determination of the value of the Company’s liabilities that are reported at fair value in the financial statements is the responsibility of the Company’s valuation actuary group, which reports to the Company’s Senior Vice President and Actuary. This group manages and creates the policies and processes used to determine the fair value for these liabilities. This methodology uses internal assumptions and directed third-party inputs to derive a value including a risk-neutral option pricing model that incorporates a third-party-developed index that is consistent with the attributes of the product and provides

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

for an approximate match of the volatility measure with the expected life of the underlying contracts. The fair value methodologies and the fair values are reviewed by the Senior Vice President and Actuary, the Principal Accounting Officer, and the Chief Financial Officer. The results of those reviews are made known to the Company’s Disclosure Committee and to the Company’s Audit Committee. In addition, any significant policy or process changes made during the quarter are also discussed with the Company’s Audit Committee.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

Categories Reported at Fair Value

The following tables present categories reported at fair value on a recurring basis.


	June 30, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government	$	12,781	$	119,991	$	3,120	$	135,892
Federal agencies ¹		-		26,123		-		26,123
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities ¹		-		106,439		-		106,439

Subtotal		12,781		252,553		3,120		268,454
Corporate obligations:
Industrial		-		542,488		2,453		544,941
Energy		-		191,293		2,383		193,676
Communications and technology		-		219,485		-		219,485
Financial		-		305,180		11,642		316,822
Consumer		-		514,515		21,037		535,552
Public utilities		-		292,514		-		292,514

Subtotal		-		2,065,475		37,515		2,102,990
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities		-		151,638		-		151,638
Municipal securities		-		169,784		4,364		174,148
Other		-		103,178		-		103,178
Redeemable preferred stocks		15,842		-		-		15,842

Fixed maturity securities		28,623		2,742,628		44,999		2,816,250

Equity securities		2,131		33,904		1,149		37,184

Total	$	30,754	$	2,776,532	$	46,148	$	2,853,434


Percent of total		1%		97%		2%		100%


Liabilities:
Other policyholder funds
GMWB	$	-	$	-	$	278	$	278

Total	$	-	$	-	$	278	$	278

¹	Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued


	December 31, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3			Total
Assets:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government	$	12,876	$	118,130	$	3,431		$	134,437
Federal agencies ¹		-		25,881		-			25,881
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities ¹		-		119,637		-			119,637

Subtotal		12,876		263,648		3,431			279,955
Corporate obligations:
Industrial		-		486,380		500			486,880
Energy		-		169,342		2,369			171,711
Communications and technology		-		201,393		-			201,393
Financial		-		307,464		10,614			318,078
Consumer		-		474,553		21,934			496,487
Public utilities		-		296,337		-			296,337

Subtotal		-		1,935,469		35,417			1,970,886
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities		-		156,902		-			156,902
Municipal securities		-		163,611		4,911			168,522
Other		-		94,656		-			94,656
Redeemable preferred stocks		11,221		-		-			11,221

Fixed maturity securities		24,097		2,614,286		43,759			2,682,142

Equity securities		2,216		33,350		1,123			36,689

Total	$	26,313	$	2,647,636	$	44,882		$	2,718,831


Percent of total		1%		97%		2%			100%


Liabilities:
Other policyholder funds
GMWB	$	-	$	-	$	(187	)	$	(187	)

Total	$	-	$	-	$	(187	)	$	(187	)

¹	Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The following tables present the fair value of fixed maturity and equity securities available for sale by pricing source and fair value hierarchy level.


	June 30, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Fixed maturity securities available for sale:
Priced from external pricing services	$	28,623	$	2,695,082	$	-	$	2,723,705
Priced from independent broker quotations		-		47,546		-		47,546
Priced from internal matrices and calculations		-		-		44,999		44,999

Subtotal		28,623		2,742,628		44,999		2,816,250

Equity securities available for sale:
Priced from external pricing services		2,131		7,271		-		9,402
Priced from independent broker quotations		-		-		-		-
Priced from internal matrices and calculations		-		26,633		1,149		27,782

Subtotal		2,131		33,904		1,149		37,184

Total	$	30,754	$	2,776,532	$	46,148	$	2,853,434

Percent of total		1%		97%		2%		100%


	December 31, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Fixed maturity securities available for sale:
Priced from external pricing services	$	24,097	$	2,582,617	$	-	$	2,606,714
Priced from independent broker quotations		-		31,669		-		31,669
Priced from internal matrices and calculations		-		-		43,759		43,759

Subtotal		24,097		2,614,286		43,759		2,682,142

Equity securities available for sale:
Priced from external pricing services		2,216		7,444		-		9,660
Priced from independent broker quotations		-		-		-		-
Priced from internal matrices and calculations		-		25,906		1,123		27,029

Subtotal		2,216		33,350		1,123		36,689

Total	$	26,313	$	2,647,636	$	44,882	$	2,718,831

Percent of total		1%		97%		2%		100%

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2012 and year ended December 31, 2011 are summarized below:


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2012
	Assets								Liabilities
	Fixed maturity securities available for sale			Equity securities available for sale		Total			GMWB
Beginning balance	$	45,652		$	1,093	$	46,745		$	(950	)
Included in earnings		3			-		3			1,371
Included in other comprehensive income		260			56		316			-
Purchases, issuances, sales and other dispositions:
Purchases		-			-		-			-
Issuances		-			-		-			141
Sales		-			-		-			-
Other dispositions		(916	)		-		(916	)		(284	)
Transfers into Level 3		-			-		-			-
Transfers out of Level 3		-			-		-			-

Ending balance	$	44,999		$	1,149	$	46,148		$	278

Net unrealized losses	$	248		$	56	$	304


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Assets								Liabilities
	Fixed maturity securities available for sale			Equity securities available for sale		Total			GMWB
Beginning balance	$	43,759		$	1,123	$	44,882		$	(187	)
Included in earnings		7			-		7			683
Included in other comprehensive income		(39	)		26		(13	)		-
Purchases, issuances, sales and other dispositions:
Purchases		-			-		-			-
Issuances		-			-		-			196
Sales		-			-		-			-
Other dispositions		(2,542	)		-		(2,542	)		(414	)
Transfers into Level 3		3,814			-		3,814			-
Transfers out of Level 3		-			-		-			-

Ending balance	$	44,999		$	1,149	$	46,148		$	278

Net unrealized losses	$	(51	)	$	26	$	(25	)

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued


	Year Ended December 31, 2011
	Assets									Liabilities
	Fixed maturity securities available for sale			Equity securities available for sale			Total			GMWB
Beginning balance	$	55,801		$	1,180		$	56,981		$	(2,799	)
Included in earnings		11			92			103			2,500
Included in other comprehensive income		1,385			51			1,436			-
Purchases, issuances, sales and other dispositions:
Purchases		-			-			-			-
Issuances		-			-			-			163
Sales		-			-			-			-
Other dispositions		(2,977	)		(200	)		(3,177	)		(51	)
Transfers into Level 3		8,640			-			8,640			-
Transfers out of Level 3		(19,101	)		-			(19,101	)		-

Ending balance	$	43,759		$	1,123		$	44,882		$	(187	)

Net unrealized gains	$	1,401		$	105		$	1,506

The Company did not exclude any realized or unrealized gains or losses on items transferred into Level 3 in any of the periods presented. Depending upon the availability of Level 1 or Level 2 pricing, specific securities may transfer into or out of Level 3. The Company did not have any transfers between Level 1 or Level 2 during the second quarter or six months ended June 30, 2012.

The following table presents quantitative information about material Level 3 fair value measurements as of June 30, 2012.

Fair Value

Valuation
Technique

Unobservable
Inputs

Range
(in basis points)

Weighted
Average
of Range

Fixed maturity securities

44,999

Market comparable

Spread adjustment

46-367

190

The Company’s primary category of Level 3 fair values is fixed maturity securities, totaling $45.0 million as of June 30, 2012. These assets are valued using comparable security valuations through the unobservable input of estimated discount spreads. Specifically, the Company reviews the values and discount spreads on similar securities for which such information is observable in the market. Estimates of increased discount spreads are then determined based upon the characteristics of the securities being evaluated. The Company estimates that an increased spread of 10 basis points on each of the Level 3 securities would reduce the reported fair value by $0.2 million, as of June 30, 2012.

Other assets and liabilities categorized as Level 3 for purposes of fair value determination are not material to the Company’s financial statements, and the sensitivities of such valuations to unobservable inputs are also believed to not be material.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The table below is a summary of fair value estimates at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 for financial instruments. The Company has not included assets and liabilities that are not financial instruments in this disclosure. The total of the fair value calculations presented do not represent, and should not be construed to represent, the underlying value of the Company.


	June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value			Fair Value
Assets:
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities available for sale	$	2,816,250	$	2,816,250	$	2,682,142		$	2,682,142
Equity securities available for sale		37,184		37,184		36,689			36,689
Mortgage loans		579,500		623,887		601,923			642,905
Policy loans		79,447		79,447		80,375			80,375
Cash and short-term investments		23,021		23,021		59,752			59,752
Separate account assets		320,566		320,566		316,609			316,609

Liabilities:
Individual and group annuities		1,112,283		1,091,546		1,082,324			1,062,407
Supplementary contracts without life contingencies		54,898		53,872		56,193			54,824
Separate account liabilities		320,566		320,566		316,609			316,609
Other policyholder funds – GMWB		278		278		(187	)		(187	)

5. Financing Receivables

The Company has financing receivables that have both a specific maturity date, either on demand or on a fixed or determinable date, and are recognized as an asset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The table below identifies the Company’s financing receivables by classification at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


	June 30 2012		December 31 2011
Receivables:
Agent receivables, net (allowance $2,230; $2,226 – 2011)	$	1,527	$	1,708
Investment-related financing receivables:
Mortgage loans, net (allowance $2,517; $2,849 – 2011)		579,500		601,923

Total financing receivables	$	581,027	$	603,631

The following table details the activity of the allowance for uncollectible accounts on agent receivables at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


	June 30 2012			December 31 2011
Beginning of year	$	2,226		$	644
Additions		154			1,724
Deductions		(150	)		(142	)

End of period	$	2,230		$	2,226

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The following table details the mortgage loan portfolio as collectively or individually evaluated for impairment.


	June 30 2012			December 31 2011
Mortgage loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	582,017		$	604,772
Mortgage loans individually evaluated for impairment		-			-
Allowance for potential future losses		(2,517	)		(2,849	)

Carrying value	$	579,500		$	601,923

The following table details the activity of the allowance for potential future losses on mortgage loans at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


	June 30 2012			December 31 2011
Beginning of year	$	2,849		$	3,410
Additions		32			-
Deductions		(364	)		(561	)

End of period	$	2,517		$	2,849

Agent Receivables

The Company has agent receivables which are classified as financing receivables and are reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts. These trade receivables from agents are long-term in nature and are specifically assessed as to the collectability of each receivable. The Company’s gross agent receivables totaled $3.7 million at June 30, 2012, and the Company maintained an allowance for doubtful accounts totaling $2.2 million. Gross agent receivables totaled $3.9 million with an allowance for doubtful accounts of $2.2 million at December 31, 2011. The Company has two types of agent receivables, including:

•

Agent specific loans. At June 30, 2012, these loans totaled $1.0 million with an allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.2 million. At December 31, 2011, agent specific loans totaled $0.8 million with an allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.2 million.

•

Various agent commission advances and other commission receivables. Gross agent receivables in this category totaled $2.7 million, with an allowance for doubtful accounts of $2.0 million at June 30, 2012. Gross agent receivables totaled $3.1 million and the allowance for doubtful accounts was $2.0 million at December 31, 2011.

Mortgage Loans

The Company considers its mortgage loan portfolio to be long-term financing receivables. Mortgage loans are stated at cost, net of an allowance for potential future losses. Mortgage loan interest income is recognized on an accrual basis with any premium or discount amortized over the life of the loan. Prepayment and late fees are recorded on the date of collection. Loans in foreclosure, loans considered impaired, or loans past due 90 days or more are placed on a non-accrual status.

If a mortgage loan is determined to be on non-accrual status, the Company does not accrue interest income. The loan is independently monitored and evaluated as to potential impairment or foreclosure. This evaluation includes assessing the probability of receiving future cash flows, along with consideration of many of the factors described below. If delinquent payments are made and the loan is brought current, then the Company returns the loan to active status and accrues income accordingly.

Generally, the Company considers its mortgage loans to be a portfolio segment. The Company considers its primary class to be property type. The Company primarily uses loan-to-value as its credit risk quality indicator but also monitors additional secondary risk factors, such as geographic distribution both on a regional and specific state basis. The mortgage loan portfolio segment is presented by property-type in a table in Note 3 – Investments, as are geographic distributions for both regional and significant state concentrations. These measures are also supplemented with various other analytics to provide additional information concerning mortgage loans and management’s assessment of financing receivables.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The following table presents an aging schedule for delinquent payments for both principal and interest at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, by property type.


			Amount of Payments Past Due
	Book Value		30-59 Days		60-89 Days		> 90 Days		Total
June 30, 2012
Industrial	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Medical		-		-		-		-		-
Office		159		9		-		-		9
Other		-		-		-		-		-

Total	$	159	$	9	$	-	$	-	$	9

December 31, 2011
Industrial	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Office		816		13		-		-		13
Medical		7,019		75		-		-		75
Other		-		-		-		-		-

Total	$	7,835	$	88	$	-	$	-	$	88

At June 30, 2012, there was one mortgage loan that was 30 days past due. Subsequently, payment was received and this loan was brought current in July 2012.

The allowance for potential future losses on mortgage loans is maintained at a level believed by management to be adequate to absorb estimated credit losses. Management’s periodic evaluation and assessment of the adequacy of the reserve is based on known and inherent risks in the portfolio, historical and industry data, current economic conditions, and other relevant factors. The Company assesses the amount it maintains in the mortgage loan allowance through an assessment of what the Company believes are relevant factors at both the macro-environmental level and specific loan basis. A loan is considered impaired if it is probable that contractual amounts due will not be collected. The Company’s allowance for potential future losses was $2.5 million at June 30, 2012 and $2.8 million at December 31, 2011. For information regarding management’s periodic evaluation and assessment of mortgage loans and the allowance for potential future losses, please refer to Note 5 – Financing Receivables in the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K.

The Company has had three mortgage loan defaults in the current and prior year. One loan was foreclosed in the first quarter of 2012 and an impairment of $0.2 million was recorded. One of the loan defaults in 2011 resulted in an impairment of $0.4 million, while the second loan default in 2011 did not result in an impairment based upon the fair value of the property being greater than the loan value. The Company had no troubled loans that were restructured or modified during 2012 or 2011.

6. Variable Interest Entities

The Company invests in certain affordable housing and real estate joint ventures which are considered to be variable interest entities (VIEs) and are included in Real Estate in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The assets held in affordable housing real estate joint venture VIEs are primarily residential real estate properties that are restricted to provide affordable housing under federal or state programs for varying periods of time. The restrictions primarily apply to the rents that may be paid by tenants residing in the properties during the term of an agreement to remain in the affordable housing program. Investments in real estate joint ventures are equity interests in partnerships or limited liability corporations that may or may not participate in profits or residual value. In certain cases, the Company may issue fixed-rate senior mortgage loan investments secured by properties controlled by VIEs. These investments are classified as mortgage loans in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the income received from such investments is recorded as investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. For additional information, please refer to Note 6 – Variable Interest Entities in the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The following table presents the carrying amount and maximum exposure to loss relating to VIEs for which the Company holds a variable interest, but is not the primary beneficiary, and which had not been consolidated at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The table includes investments in eight real estate joint ventures and 28 affordable housing real estate joint ventures at June 30, 2012 and investments in eleven real estate joint ventures and 28 affordable housing real estate joint ventures at December 31, 2011.


	June 30 2012				December 31 2011
	Carrying Amount		Maximum Exposure to Loss		Carrying Amount		Maximum Exposure to Loss
Real estate joint ventures	$	24,089	$	24,089	$	35,551	$	35,551
Affordable housing real estate joint ventures		24,171		60,966		20,749		61,124

Total	$	48,260	$	85,055	$	56,300	$	96,675

The maximum exposure to loss relating to the real estate joint ventures and affordable housing real estate joint ventures, as shown in the table above, is equal to the carrying amounts plus any unfunded equity commitments, exposure to potential recapture of tax credits, guarantees of debt, or other obligations of the VIE with recourse to the Company. Unfunded equity and loan commitments typically require financial or operating performance by other parties and have not yet become due or payable but which may become due in the future.

At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had $1.4 million and $6.4 million, respectively, in fixed-rate senior mortgage loan commitments outstanding to the benefit of entities that are also real estate joint venture VIEs. The loan commitments are included in the discussion of commitments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for both periods. The Company also has contingent commitments to fund additional equity contributions for operating support to certain real estate joint venture VIEs, which could result in additional exposure to loss. However, the Company is not able to quantify the amount of these contingent commitments.

In addition, the maximum exposure to loss on affordable housing joint ventures at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 includes $11.2 million and $13.2 million, respectively, of losses which could be realized if the tax credits received by the VIEs were recaptured. Recapture events would cause the Company to reverse some or all of the benefit previously recognized by the Company or third parties to whom the tax credit interests were transferred. A recapture event can occur at any time during a 15-year required compliance period. The principal causes of recapture include financial default and non-compliance with affordable housing program requirements by the properties controlled by the VIE. The potential exposure due to recapture may be mitigated by guarantees from the managing member or managing partner in the VIE, insurance contracts, or changes in the residual value accruing to the Company’s interests in the VIEs.

7. Change in Accounting Principle

The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-26 “Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts,” effective January 1, 2012. This guidance modifies the types of costs incurred by insurance entities that can be capitalized when issuing or renewing insurance contracts. The guidance defines allowable deferred acquisition costs as incremental or directly related to the successful acquisition of new or renewal contracts. In addition, certain costs related directly to acquisition activities performed by the insurer, such as underwriting and policy issuance, are also deferrable. This guidance also defines the considerations for the deferral of direct-response advertising costs.

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company prospectively adopted this guidance. Pursuant to this guidance, the Company evaluated the types of acquisition costs it capitalizes. The Company capitalizes agent compensation and benefits and other expenses that are directly related to the successful acquisition of contracts. The Company also capitalizes expenses directly related to activities performed by the Company, such as underwriting, policy issuance, and processing fees incurred in connection with successful contract acquisitions.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

Deferred acquisition costs are capitalized as incurred. These costs for life insurance products are generally deferred and amortized over the premium paying period. Policy acquisition costs that relate to interest sensitive and variable insurance products are deferred and amortized in relation to the estimated gross profits to be realized over the lives of the contracts. For interest sensitive and variable insurance products, estimated gross profits are composed of net interest income, net realized investment gains and losses, fees, surrender charges, expenses, and mortality gains and losses. At the issuance of policies, projections of estimated gross profits are made which are then replaced by actual gross profits over the lives of the policies. The Company considers the following assumptions to be of significance when projecting future estimated gross profits: mortality, interest rates and spreads, surrender and withdrawal rates, and expense margins.

The amount of acquisition costs capitalized during the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2012 were $9.3 million and $19.0 million, respectively. The amount of acquisition costs that would have been capitalized during the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2012 if the Company’s previous policy had been applied during that period would have been $8.8 million and $17.5 million, respectively. Thus, the adoption of this guidance resulted in a $0.6 million and a $1.5 million increase in the amount of acquisition costs capitalized during the two respective periods. The net result of the adoption of ASU No. 2010-26 were increases of $0.8 million and $1.4 million in pretax earnings in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

8. Separate Accounts

The Company has a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (GMWB) rider that can be added to new or existing variable annuity contracts. The rider provides an enhanced withdrawal benefit that guarantees a stream of income payments to an owner or annuitant, regardless of the contract account value. The value of variable annuity separate accounts with the GMWB rider was $91.6 million at June 30, 2012 (December 31, 2011 - $86.6 million) and the guarantee liability was $0.3 million at June 30, 2012 (December 31, 2011 - ($0.2) million). The value of the GMWB rider is recorded at fair value. The change in this value is included in policyholder benefits in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The value of variable annuity separate accounts with the GMWB rider is recorded in separate account liabilities, and the value of the rider is included in other policyholder funds in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The determination of fair value of the GMWB liability requires models that use actuarial and financial market assumptions, which reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the contract, including adjustments for risk and issuer non-performance.

Guarantees are offered under variable universal life and variable annuity contracts: a guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB) rider is available on certain variable universal life contracts, and GMDB are provided on all variable annuities. The GMDB rider for variable universal life and variable annuity contracts guarantees the death benefit for specified periods of time, regardless of investment performance, provided cumulative premium requirements are met. The total reserve held for the variable annuity GMDB at June 30, 2012 was $0.1 million (December 31, 2011 - $0.2 million).

9. Notes Payable

The Company had no notes payable at June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.

As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (FHLB) with a capital investment of $4.7 million, the Company has the ability to borrow on a collateralized basis from the FHLB. The Company received dividends on the capital investment of less than $0.1 million in both the second quarter and the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. Dividends received were less than $0.1 million in the second quarter and $0.1 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011.

The Company has unsecured revolving lines of credit of $60.0 million with two major commercial banks with no balances outstanding and which are at variable interest rates based upon short-term indices. These lines of credit will expire in June of 2013. The Company anticipates renewing these lines as they come due.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

10. Income Taxes

The following table provides a reconciliation of the federal income tax rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate for the second quarters and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.


	Quarter Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Federal income tax rate		35%			35%			35%			35%
Tax credits, net of equity adjustment		(1	)		-			-			-
Permanent differences		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)
Other		2			-			-			-

Effective income tax rate		35%			34%			34%			34%

The Company did not have any uncertain tax positions at June 30, 2012.

At June 30, 2012, the Company had a $2.3 million current tax liability and a $75.7 million deferred tax liability, compared to a $0.3 million current tax recoverable and a $68.8 million deferred tax liability at December 31, 2011.

11. Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits

The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost for the second quarters and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:


	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	Quarter Ended June 30						Quarter Ended June 30
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Service cost	$	-		$	-		$	199		$	161
Interest cost		1,475			1,871			452			387
Expected return on plan assets		(2,225	)		(2,342	)		(8	)		(9	)
Amortization of:
Unrecognized actuarial loss		575			896			70			4
Unrecognized prior service cost		-			-			(63	)		(68	)

Net periodic benefit cost (income)	$	(175	)	$	425		$	650		$	475


	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	Six Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Service cost	$	-		$	-		$	399		$	321
Interest cost		2,950			3,742			902			774
Expected return on plan assets		(4,450	)		(4,684	)		(16	)		(18	)
Amortization of:
Unrecognized actuarial (gain) loss		(850	)		1,792			141			9
Unrecognized prior service cost		-			-			(126	)		(136	)

Net periodic benefit cost (income)	$	(2,350	)	$	850		$	1,300		$	950

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

During the first quarter of 2012, the Company identified an error related to the amortization period for unrecognized actuarial gains and losses for its pension plan. The Company determined that upon curtailment of the plan on January 1, 2011, the status of the plan participants should have changed from active to inactive. The amortization period was corrected from the average remaining service period of plan participants, approximately 10 years, to the average remaining life expectancy of plan participants, approximately 26 years. The Company has recognized a $2.0 million pre-tax benefit related to the reversal of amortization recorded during 2011.

12. Share-Based Payment

The Company has a long-term incentive plan for senior management that provides a cash award to participants for the increase in the share price of the Company’s common stock through units (phantom shares) assigned by the Board of Directors. The cash award is calculated over a three-year interval on a calendar year basis. At the conclusion of each three-year interval, participants will receive a cash award based on the increase in the share price during a defined measurement period, multiplied by the number of units. The increase in the share price will be determined based on the change in the share price from the beginning to the end of the three-year interval. Dividends are accrued and paid at the end of each three-year interval to the extent that they exceed negative stock price appreciation. Plan payments are contingent on the continued employment of the participant unless termination is due to a qualifying event such as death, disability, or retirement. The Company does not make payments in shares, warrants, or options.

No payments were made under this plan during the first six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

At each reporting period, an estimate of the share-based compensation expense is accrued, utilizing the share price at the period end. The cost of share-based compensation accrued as an operating expense in the second quarter of 2012 was $0.2 million, net of tax. The change in accrual for share-based compensation that reduced operating expense in the second quarter of 2011 was $0.1 million, net of tax. The cost of compensation accrued as an operating expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $0.5 million, net of tax. The change in accrual for share-based compensation that reduced operating expense in the first six months of 2011 was less than $0.1 million, net of tax.

13. Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes the unrealized investment gains or losses on securities available for sale (net of adjustments for realized investment gains or losses) net of adjustments to DAC, VOBA, future policy benefits, and policyholder account balances. In addition, other comprehensive income includes the change in the liability for benefit plan obligations. Other comprehensive income reflects these items net of tax.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The table below provides information about comprehensive income for the second quarters and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2012
	Before-Tax Amount			Tax (Expense) or Benefit			Net-of-Tax Amount
Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year
Fixed maturity securities	$	32,275		$	11,297		$	20,978
Equity securities		(55	)		(20	)		(35	)
Less reclassification adjustments:
Net realized investment gains (losses), excluding impairment losses		412			144			268
Other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in earnings		(188	)		(66	)		(122	)
Other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive income		42			15			27

Net unrealized gains (losses) excluding impairment losses		31,954			11,184			20,770
Effect on DAC and VOBA		(7,454	)		(2,609	)		(4,845	)
Future policy benefits		(5,389	)		(1,887	)		(3,502	)
Policyholder account balances		(219	)		(76	)		(143	)

Other comprehensive income	$	18,892		$	6,612		$	12,280

Net income								8,397

Comprehensive income							$	20,677

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued


	Quarter Ended June 30, 2011
	Before-Tax Amount			Tax (Expense) or Benefit			Net-of-Tax Amount
Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year
Fixed maturity securities	$	39,150		$	13,703		$	25,447
Equity securities		41			14			27
Less reclassification adjustments:
Net realized investment gains (losses), excluding impairment losses		2,013			705			1,308
Other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in earnings		(238	)		(83	)		(155	)
Other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive income		56			20			36

Net unrealized gains (losses) excluding impairment losses		37,360			13,075			24,285
Effect on DAC and VOBA		(6,897	)		(2,414	)		(4,483	)
Future policy benefits		(4,502	)		(1,576	)		(2,926	)
Policyholder account balances		(127	)		(44	)		(83	)

Other comprehensive income	$	25,834		$	9,041		$	16,793

Net income								11,173

Comprehensive income							$	27,966

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Before-Tax Amount			Tax (Expense) or Benefit			Net-of-Tax Amount
Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year
Fixed maturity securities	$	39,599		$	13,860		$	25,739
Equity securities		(53	)		(19	)		(34	)
Less reclassification adjustments:
Net realized investment gains (losses), excluding impairment losses		880			308			572
Other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in earnings		(456	)		(160	)		(296	)
Other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive income		150			53			97

Net unrealized gains (losses) excluding impairment losses		38,972			13,640			25,332
Effect on DAC and VOBA		(11,254	)		(3,939	)		(7,315	)
Future policy benefits		(7,645	)		(2,676	)		(4,969	)
Policyholder account balances		(335	)		(117	)		(218	)

Other comprehensive income	$	19,738		$	6,908		$	12,830

Net income								27,838

Comprehensive income							$	40,668

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
	Before-Tax Amount			Tax (Expense) or Benefit			Net-of-Tax Amount
Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year
Fixed maturity securities	$	39,004		$	13,652		$	25,352
Equity securities		69			24			45
Less reclassification adjustments:
Net realized investment gains (losses), excluding impairment losses		3,133			1,097			2,036
Other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in earnings		(507	)		(177	)		(330	)
Other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive income		114			40			74

Net unrealized gains (losses) excluding impairment losses		36,333			12,716			23,617
Effect on DAC and VOBA		(6,830	)		(2,391	)		(4,439	)
Future policy benefits		(3,395	)		(1,189	)		(2,206	)
Policyholder account balances		(117	)		(40	)		(77	)

Other comprehensive income	$	25,991		$	9,096		$	16,895

Net income								15,964

Comprehensive income							$	32,859

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

The following table provides accumulated balances related to each component of accumulated other comprehensive income at June 30, 2012.


	Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Non-Impaired Securities		Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Impaired Securities			Benefit Plan Obligations			DAC/ VOBA Impact			Future Policy Benefits			Policyholder Account Balances			Tax Effect			Total
Beginning of year	$	213,800	$	(15,612	)	$	(78,451	)	$	(56,971	)	$	(15,903	)	$	(578	)	$	(16,199	)	$	30,086
Other comprehensive income		33,164		5,808			-			(11,254	)		(7,645	)		(335	)		(6,908	)		12,830

End of period	$	246,964	$	(9,804	)	$	(78,451	)	$	(68,225	)	$	(23,548	)	$	(913	)	$	(23,107	)	$	42,916

14. Earnings Per Share

Due to the Company’s capital structure and the absence of other potentially dilutive securities, there is no difference between basic and diluted earnings per common share for any of the periods reported. The average number of shares outstanding for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was 11,093,397 and 11,466,948, respectively. The average number of shares outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was 11,134,834 and 11,467,044, respectively. The number of shares outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was 11,056,933 and 11,309,365, respectively.

15. Segment Information

The following schedule provides the financial performance of each of the three reportable operating segments of the Company.


		Individual Insurance		Group Insurance			Old American			Intercompany Eliminations¹			Consolidated
Insurance revenues:
Second quarter:	2012	$	30,032	$	12,197		$	17,664		$	(98	)	$	59,795
	2011		25,542		12,246			16,899			(134	)		54,553
Six months:	2012	$	58,601	$	24,264		$	34,964		$	(197	)	$	117,632
	2011		56,274		24,800			33,607			(269	)		114,412

Net investment income:
Second quarter:	2012	$	40,334	$	132		$	2,969		$	-		$	43,435
	2011		41,654		142			3,097			-			44,893
Six months:	2012	$	81,455	$	260		$	5,929		$	-		$	87,644
	2011		83,767		287			6,230			-			90,284

Net income (loss):
Second quarter:	2012	$	6,704	$	121		$	1,572		$	-		$	8,397
	2011		10,937		(152	)		388			-			11,173
Six months:	2012	$	26,191	$	(214	)	$	1,861		$	-		$	27,838
	2011		17,042		(552	)		(526	)		-			15,964

Elimination entries to remove intercompany transactions for life and accident and health insurance that the Company purchases for its employees and agents were as follows: insurance revenues from the Group Insurance segment and operating expenses from the Individual Insurance segment to arrive at Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

16. Commitments

In the normal course of business, the Company has open purchase and sale commitments. At June 30, 2012, the Company had purchase commitments to fund mortgage loans and other investments of $10.5 million. Included in this total, the Company had commitments to originate mortgage loans of $8.4 million at June 30, 2012 with fixed interest rates ranging from 4.13% to 5.50%. At June 30, 2012, the Company also had a commitment to fund one construction-to-permanent loan of $0.3 million that is subject to the borrower’s performance.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)–Continued

17. Contingent Liabilities

The Company is occasionally involved in litigation, both as a defendant and as a plaintiff. The life insurance industry, including the Company and its subsidiaries, has been subject to an increase in litigation in recent years. Such litigation has been pursued on behalf of purported classes of insurance purchasers, often questioning the conduct of insurers in the marketing of their products. In addition, state regulatory bodies, the SEC, FINRA, and other regulatory bodies regularly make inquiries and conduct examinations or investigations concerning the Company’s compliance with laws in relation to, but not limited to, insurance, securities and activities of broker-dealers and investment advisors.

The Company’s retail broker-dealer subsidiary is in an industry that involves substantial risks of liability. The Company’s broker-dealer subsidiary, Sunset Financial Services (SFS), has been named as a defendant in several new cases in recent periods. In recent years, regulatory proceedings, litigation, and FINRA arbitration actions related to registered representative activity and securities products (including, mutual funds, variable annuities, and alternative investments, such as real estate investment products and oil and gas investments) have continued to increase. Given the significant decline in the major market indices beginning in 2008, and the generally poor performance of investments that have historically been considered safe and conservative, there is the potential for an increase in the number of proceedings to which a broker-dealer may be named as a party.

In addition to the above, the Company and its subsidiaries are defendants in, or subject to, other claims or legal actions related to insurance and investment products. Some of these claims and legal actions are in jurisdictions where juries are given substantial latitude in assessing damages, including punitive damages.

Although no assurances can be given and no determinations can be made at this time, management believes that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these legal actions and other claims would not have a material effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, or financial position.

In accordance with applicable accounting guidelines, the Company has established an accrued liability for litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and estimable. As a litigation or regulatory matter develops, it is evaluated on an ongoing basis, in conjunction with outside counsel, as to whether the matter presents a loss contingency that meets conditions indicating the need for accrual and/or disclosure. If and when a loss contingency related to litigation or regulatory matters is deemed to be both probable and estimable, the Company establishes an accrued liability. This accrued liability is then monitored for further developments that may affect the amount of the accrued liability.

18. Guarantees and Indemnifications

The Company is subject to various indemnification obligations issued in conjunction with certain transactions, primarily assumption reinsurance agreements, stock purchase agreements, mortgage servicing agreements, tax credit assignment agreements, construction and lease guarantees and borrowing agreements whose terms range in duration and often are not explicitly defined. Generally, a maximum obligation is not explicitly stated. Therefore, the overall maximum amount of the obligation under the indemnifications cannot be reasonably estimated. The Company is unable to estimate with certainty the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to these indemnifications. The Company believes that the likelihood is remote that material payments would be required under such indemnifications and therefore such indemnifications would not result in a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations.

19. Subsequent Events

On July 23, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share that will be paid August 8, 2012 to stockholders of record as of August 2, 2012.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Amounts are stated in thousands, except share data, or as otherwise noted.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is intended to provide in narrative form the perspective of the management of Kansas City Life Insurance Company (the Company) on its financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and certain other factors that may affect its future results. The following is a discussion and analysis of the results of operations for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and the financial condition of the Company at June 30, 2012. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in this document, as well as the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K.

Overview

Kansas City Life Insurance Company is a financial services company that is predominantly focused on the underwriting, sales, and administration of life insurance and annuity products. The consolidated entity (the Company) primarily consists of three life insurance companies. Kansas City Life Insurance Company (Kansas City Life) is the parent company. Sunset Life Insurance Company of America (Sunset Life) and Old American Insurance Company (Old American) are wholly-owned subsidiaries. For additional information, please refer to the Overview included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K.

Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information

This report reviews the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, and historical information is presented and discussed. Where appropriate, factors that may affect future financial performance are also identified and discussed. Certain statements made in this report include “forward-looking statements” that fall within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance, or achievements rather than historical facts and may contain words like “believe,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “forecast,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “will,” “shall,” and other words, phrases, or expressions with similar meaning.

Actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements as a result of risks and uncertainties. Those risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risk factors listed in Item 1A. Risk Factors as filed in the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K. For additional information, please refer to the Overview included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K.

Consolidated Results of Operations

Summary of Results

The Company earned net income of $8.4 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to $11.2 million in the second quarter of 2011. Net income per share was $0.78 in the second quarter of 2012 versus $0.97 in same period in the prior year. Net income for the first six months of 2012 was $27.8 million, an increase of $11.9 million or 74% compared to last year. Net income per share for the six months was $2.50, an increase of $1.11 per share versus the same period one year earlier. The following table presents variances between the results for the second quarters and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. Additional information on these items is presented below.


	Quarter Ended June 30 2012 Versus 2011			Six Months Ended June 30 2012 Versus 2011
Insurance and other revenues	$	4,888		$	2,643
Net investment income		(1,458	)		(2,640	)
Net realized investment gains		(496	)		14,380
Policyholder benefits and interest credited to policyholder account balances		(2,022	)		4,705
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs		(4,416	)		(2,733	)
Operating expenses		(580	)		1,323
Income tax expense		1,308			(5,804	)

Total variance	$	(2,776	)	$	11,874

Sales

The Company measures sales in terms of new premiums and deposits. Sales of traditional life insurance, immediate annuities, and accident and health products are reported as premium income for financial statement purposes. Deposits received from the sale of interest sensitive products, including universal life insurance, fixed deferred annuities, variable universal life, variable annuities, and supplementary contracts without life contingencies are reflected as deposits in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The Company’s marketing plan for individual products focuses on three main aspects: providing financial security with respect to life insurance, the accumulation of long-term value, and future retirement income needs. The primary emphasis is on the growth of individual life insurance business, including new premiums for individual life products and new deposits for universal life and variable universal life products.

Sales are primarily made through the Company’s existing sales force. The Company emphasizes growth of the sales force with the addition of new general agents and agents. The Company believes that increased sales will result through both the number and productivity of general agents and agents. In addition, the Company places an emphasis on training and direct support to the field force to assist new agents in their start-up phase. In addition, the Company provides support to existing

agents to stay abreast of the ever-changing regulatory environment and to introduce agents to new products and enhanced features of existing products. On occasion, the Company may also selectively utilize third-party marketing arrangements to enhance its sales objectives. This allows the Company the flexibility to identify niches or pursue unique avenues in the existing market environment and to react quickly to take advantage of opportunities as they occur.

The Company also markets a series of group products. These products include group life, dental, disability, and vision products. The primary growth strategies for these products include increased productivity of the existing group representatives; planned expansion of the group distribution system; and to selectively utilize third-party marketing arrangements. Further, growth is to be supported by the addition of new products to the portfolio, particularly voluntary-type products.

The following table presents gross premiums by new and renewal business, less reinsurance ceded, as included in insurance revenues for the second quarters and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. New premiums are also detailed by product.


	Quarter Ended June 30
	2012			% Change			2011			% Change
New premiums:
Individual life insurance	$	4,414			2		$	4,313			5
Immediate annuities		3,460			234			1,037			(77	)
Group life insurance		744			64			453			(9	)
Group accident and health insurance		3,199			(5	)		3,367			5

Total new premiums		11,817			29			9,170			(26	)
Renewal premiums		37,033			1			36,509			2

Total premiums		48,850			7			45,679			(5	)
Reinsurance ceded		(14,645	)		(2	)		(14,878	)		6

Premiums, net	$	34,205			11		$	30,801			(10	)


	Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			% Change			2011			% Change
New premiums:
Individual life insurance	$	8,770			1		$	8,724			9
Immediate annuities		5,168			38			3,746			(62	)
Group life insurance		1,225			29			947			(16	)
Group accident and health insurance		5,743			(18	)		6,991			7

Total new premiums		20,906			2			20,408			(20	)
Renewal premiums		74,283			3			71,955			2

Total premiums		95,189			3			92,363			(4	)
Reinsurance ceded		(28,280	)		1			(27,937	)		3

Premiums, net	$	66,909			4		$	64,426			(7	)

Consolidated total premiums increased $3.2 million or 7% in the second quarter of 2012 versus the same period in the prior year, as total new premiums increased $2.6 million or 29% and total renewal premiums increased $0.5 million or 1%. The increase in total new premiums was largely due to a $2.4 million increase in immediate annuities. Immediate annuity receipts can have sizeable fluctuations, as receipts from policyholders largely result from one-time premiums rather than recurring premiums. In addition, new group life insurance premiums increased. The increase in consolidated renewal premiums was largely due to a $0.6 million increase in individual life insurance premiums, attributable to the Old American segment.

Consolidated total premiums increased $2.8 million or 3% in the first six months of 2012 versus one year earlier, reflecting a $0.5 million or 2% increase in total new premiums and a $2.3 million or 3% increase in total renewal premiums. The increase in total new premiums was due to a $1.4 million or 38% increase in new immediate annuity premiums and a $0.3 million increase in new group life premiums. These improvements were partially offset by a $1.2 million or 18% decrease in new group accident and health premiums, primarily in the dental and short-term disability lines. The increase in renewal premiums reflected an increase in individual life insurance premiums from both the Individual and Old American segments. In addition, renewal group accident and health premiums increased, largely from the short-term disability line.

The following table reconciles deposits with the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and provides detail by new and renewal deposits for the second quarters and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. New deposits are also detailed by product.


	Quarter Ended June 30
	2012		% Change			2011		% Change
New deposits:
Universal life insurance	$	2,857		(24	)	$	3,750		22
Variable universal life insurance		103		(62	)		268		35
Fixed deferred annuities		12,469		(31	)		18,025		58
Variable annuities		4,642		(24	)		6,142		10

Total new deposits		20,071		(29	)		28,185		39
Renewal deposits		35,325		(3	)		36,333		-

Total deposits	$	55,396		(14	)	$	64,518		14


	Six Months Ended June 30
	2012		% Change			2011		% Change
New deposits:
Universal life insurance	$	6,160		(6	)	$	6,562		1
Variable universal life insurance		260		(47	)		493		12
Fixed deferred annuities		31,619		(4	)		32,917		47
Variable annuities		8,603		(14	)		9,979		(13	)

Total new deposits		46,642		(7	)		49,951		22
Renewal deposits		70,217		(3	)		72,031		3

Total deposits	$	116,859		(4	)	$	121,982		10

Total new deposits decreased $8.1 million or 29% in the second quarter of 2012 compared with the second quarter of 2011. This change was primarily due to a $5.6 million or 31% decrease in new fixed deferred annuity deposits and a $1.5 million or 24% decrease in new variable annuity deposits. Total renewal deposits decreased $1.0 million or 3% in the second quarter of 2012 versus last year, reflecting a $0.9 million or 33% decrease in renewal variable annuity deposits. Total new deposits decreased $3.3 million or 7% in the first six months of 2012 compared with the prior year. This decrease was largely due to a $1.4 million or 14% decline in new variable annuity deposits and a $1.3 million or 4% decrease in new fixed deferred annuity deposits. Total renewal deposits decreased $1.8 million or 3%, reflecting a $2.1 million or 35% decrease in renewal variable annuity deposits. Partially offsetting this decline, renewal fixed deferred annuity deposits increased $0.8 million or 5% compared to last year. New sales and renewals for deposit products have been negatively affected for the second quarter and first six months of 2012 by continuing low interest rates and the uncertain economic environment.

Insurance Revenues

Insurance revenues consist of premiums, net of reinsurance, and contract charges. In the second quarter of 2012, total insurance revenues increased $5.2 million or 10%, reflecting a $3.4 million or 11% increase in net premiums and a $1.8 million or 8% increase in contract charges compared to the prior year. The increase in net premiums resulted from a $0.8 million or 3% increase in total individual life premiums, largely from the Old American segment, and a $2.4 million increase in total immediate annuity premiums.

Insurance revenues increased $3.2 million or 3% in the first six months of 2012 compared with the prior year. This increase was due to a $2.5 million or 4% increase in net premiums and a $0.7 million or 1% increase in contract charges. The increase in net premiums largely resulted from a $1.6 million or 3% increase in total individual life insurance premiums, also largely from the Old American segment, and a $1.2 million or 29% increase in total immediate annuity premiums.

Contract charges consist of cost of insurance, expense loads, amortization of unearned revenues, and surrender charges on policyholder account balances. Certain contract charges are not recognized in income immediately but are deferred and amortized into income in proportion to the expected future gross profits of the business, in a manner similar to DAC. Profit expectations are based upon assumptions of future interest spreads, mortality margins, expense margins, and policy and premium persistency experience. At least annually, a review is performed of the assumptions related to profit expectations. If it is determined the assumptions should be revised, the impact is recorded as a change in the revenue reported in the current period as an unlocking adjustment.

Contract charges are impacted by the sales of new products and the persistency of both existing and closed blocks of business. The closed blocks of business reflect policies and companies that the Company has purchased but to which the Company is not actively pursuing marketing efforts to generate new sales and has the intent of servicing to achieve long-term profit streams.

Total contract charges on all blocks of business increased $1.8 million or 8% in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same periods in 2011. The increase in the second quarter of 2012 was largely due to a $2.5 million increase in the amortization of deferred revenue. Amortization of deferred revenue increased $1.8 million during the second quarter of 2012 due to unlocking. This unlocking was due to changes in the interest and mortality margins that resulted in a decrease to the deferred revenue liability. Conversely, deferred revenue decreased $1.8 million during second quarter 2011 due to unlocking. The 2011 unlocking was primarily the result of the implementation of a new industry mortality table and the impact of a system upgrade specific to reinsurance.

Total contract charges on all blocks of business increased $0.7 million in the first six months of 2012 compared to one year earlier. In addition to the results discussed above for the quarter, the amortization of deferred revenue increased during 2012 due to a system upgrade that occurred during 2011 that led to enhanced reinsurance modeling capabilities. Partially offsetting this increase was a $0.4 million decrease in both expense loads and cost of insurance charges. The decrease in expense loads resulted from a decline in value of variable annuities held in the separate accounts, reflecting the existing market conditions. The decline in cost of insurance charges was largely due to the runoff of closed blocks.

Total contract charges on closed blocks equaled 34% and 37% of total consolidated contract charges in the second quarters of 2012 and 2011, and 35% and 36% for the first six months of 2012 and 2011, respectively. Total contract charges on closed blocks decreased 1% in the second quarter and 2% in the first six months of 2012 compared to the same periods in the prior year. These declines reflect the runoff of the closed blocks. Total contract charges on open, or ongoing, blocks of business increased 13% in the second quarter and 4% in the first six months, reflecting in part new sales of these products and the unlocking discussed above.

The Company uses reinsurance as a means to mitigate its risks and to reduce the earnings volatility from claims. Reinsurance ceded premiums decreased $0.2 million or 2% in the second quarter of 2012 and increased $0.3 million or 1% in the first six months of 2012, as compared to the same periods in 2011. Reinsurance ceded for the Group segment increased $0.1 million or 4% in the second quarter and $0.9 million or 15% in the six months, reflecting increased disability sales that were largely reinsured. Reinsurance ceded for the Old American segment declined $0.1 million or 12% in the second quarter and $0.2 million or 15% in the first six months of 2012, reflecting the continued runoff of a large closed block of reinsured business. Reinsurance ceded for the Individual Insurance segment decreased $0.3 million or 3% in the second quarter and $0.3 million or 2% in the first six months of 2012.

Investment Revenues

Gross investment income is largely composed of interest, dividends and other earnings on fixed maturity securities, equity securities, short-term investments, mortgage loans, real estate, and policy loans. Gross investment income decreased $1.0 million or 2% in the second quarter and $2.5 million or 3% in the first six months of 2012 compared with the same periods in 2011. While average invested assets increased in both the second quarter and first six months during 2012, these changes were more than offset by lower yields earned on certain investments.

Fixed maturity securities provided a majority of the Company’s investment income during both the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2012. Income on these investments declined $1.1 million or 3% in the second quarter and $2.7 million or 4% in the first six months of 2012 compared to the prior year, reflecting declines in yields earned.

Investment income from mortgage loans decreased 1% in the second quarter and increased 4% in the first six months of 2012 compared to the same periods in 2011. The improvement in the six months was largely the result of higher mortgage loan portfolio holdings in the first six months of 2012 compared to the first six months of 2011, as the Company increased the mortgage loan balance through purchases made during 2011.

Net investment income is stated net of investment expenses. Investment expenses increased $0.4 million or 15% in the second quarter of 2012 and $0.2 million or 3% in the first six months of 2012 compared to the same periods in 2011. These changes were largely attributable to increased real estate expenses.

The Company realizes investment gains and losses from several sources, including write-downs of investments and sales of investment securities and real estate. Many securities purchased by the Company contain call provisions, which allow the issuer to redeem the securities at a particular price. Depending upon the terms of the call provision and price at which the security was purchased, a gain or loss may be realized.

The following table provides detail concerning realized investment gains and losses for the second quarters and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.


	Quarter Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Gross gains resulting from:
Sales of investment securities	$	-		$	3,341		$	313		$	3,652
Investment securities called and other		595			387			803			1,250
Sales of real estate		1,010			-			16,180			-

Total gross gains		1,605			3,728			17,296			4,902

Gross losses resulting from:
Sales of investment securities		(32	)		(1,590	)		(32	)		(1,590	)
Investment securities called and other		(151	)		(125	)		(204	)		(179	)
Mortgage loans		(13	)		-			(178	)		(3	)

Total gross losses		(196	)		(1,715	)		(414	)		(1,772	)
Change in allowance for potential future losses on mortgage loans		(32	)		-			332			-
Amortization of DAC and VOBA		(16	)		(120	)		(16	)		(225	)

Net realized investment gains, excluding impairment losses		1,361			1,893			17,198			2,905


Net impairment losses recognized in earnings:
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses		(188	)		(238	)		(456	)		(507	)
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income		42			56			150			114

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings		(146	)		(182	)		(306	)		(393	)

Net realized investment gains	$	1,215		$	1,711		$	16,892		$	2,512

The Company recorded a net realized investment gain of $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2012, compared with a $1.7 million net realized investment gain in the second quarter of 2011. During the second quarter of 2012, investment gains on sales of real estate totaled $1.0 million. Net realized investment gains for the first six months totaled $16.9 million in 2012 compared to $2.5 million in 2011, largely reflecting gains on sales of real estate of $16.2 million. In the above table, investment securities called and other includes, but is not limited to, principal payments and sinking funds.

The Company’s analysis of securities for the second quarter ended June 30, 2012 resulted in the determination that eight fixed-maturity residential mortgage-backed securities had other-than-temporary impairments and were written down by a combined $0.1 million due to credit impairments. These residential mortgage-backed securities had incremental losses, reflecting deterioration in the present value of expected future cash flows. The additional losses from these residential mortgage-backed securities totaled $0.2 million in the second quarter of 2012, including $0.1 million that was determined to be non-credit and was recognized in other comprehensive income. The total fair value of the affected securities after the write-downs was $65.7 million.

The following table summarizes securities with other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings by business segment during the first and second quarters of 2012 and 2011 by asset class:


	Quarter Ended March 31 2012		Quarter Ended June 30 2012		Six Months Ended June 30 2012
Bonds:
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities:
Individual Insurance	$	143	$	134	$	277
Group Insurance		-		-		-
Old American		17		12		29

Total	$	160	$	146	$	306

Segment detail:
Individual Insurance	$	143	$	134	$	277
Group Insurance		-		-		-
Old American		17		12		29

Consolidated total	$	160	$	146	$	306


	Quarter Ended March 31 2011		Quarter Ended June 30 2011		Six Months Ended June 30 2011
Bonds:
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities:
Individual Insurance	$	188	$	164	$	352
Group Insurance		-		-		-
Old American		23		18		41

Total	$	211	$	182	$	393

Segment detail:
Individual Insurance	$	188	$	164	$	352
Group Insurance		-		-		-
Old American		23		18		41

Consolidated total	$	211	$	182	$	393

Analysis of Investments

The Company seeks to protect policyholders’ benefits and achieve a desired level of organizational profitability by optimizing risk and return on an ongoing basis through managing asset and liability cash flows, monitoring credit risk, avoiding high levels of investments that may be redeemed by the issuer, maintaining sufficiently liquid investments and avoiding undue asset concentrations through diversification, among other things.

The primary sources of investment risk to which the Company is exposed include credit risk, interest rate risk, and liquidity risk. The Company’s ability to manage these risks is essential to the success of the organization. In particular, the Company devotes considerable resources to both the credit analysis of each new investment and to ongoing credit positions. A default by an issuer usually involves some loss of principal to the investor. Losses can be mitigated by timely sales of affected securities or by active involvement in a restructuring process. However, there can be no assurance that the efforts of an investor will lead to favorable outcomes in a bankruptcy or restructuring. Credit risk is managed primarily through industry, issuer, and structure diversification.

The following table provides information regarding fixed maturity and equity securities by asset class at June 30, 2012.


	Total Fair Value		% of Total		Fair Value of Securities with Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Gains		Fair Value of Securities with Gross Unrealized Losses		Gross Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government	$	135,892		4%	$	134,213	$	14,308	$	1,679	$	22
Federal agencies ¹		26,123		1%		26,123		4,061		-		1
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities ¹		106,439		4%		105,813		9,281		626		-

Subtotal		268,454		9%		266,149		27,650		2,305		23
Corporate obligations:
Industrial		544,941		19%		520,208		48,437		24,733		1,727
Energy		193,676		7%		184,096		20,692		9,580		46
Communications and technology		219,485		8%		215,432		20,097		4,053		28
Financial		316,822		11%		283,253		20,753		33,569		2,624
Consumer		535,552		19%		520,485		47,467		15,067		53
Public utilities		292,514		10%		276,538		39,068		15,976		485

Subtotal		2,102,990		74%		2,000,012		196,514		102,978		4,963
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities		151,638		5%		81,428		2,711		70,210		8,694
Municipal securities		174,148		6%		170,177		25,510		3,971		26
Other		103,178		4%		57,993		4,771		45,185		8,081
Redeemable preferred stocks		15,842		1%		12,382		328		3,460		222

Fixed maturities		2,816,250		99%		2,588,141		257,484		228,109		22,009
Equity securities		37,184		1%		36,057		1,815		1,127		130

Total	$	2,853,434		100%	$	2,624,198	$	259,299	$	229,236	$	22,139

¹	Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

The following table provides information regarding fixed maturity and equity securities by asset class at December 31, 2011.


	Total Fair Value		% of Total		Fair Value of Securities with Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Gains		Fair Value of Securities with Gross Unrealized Losses		Gross Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government	$	134,437		5%	$	133,478	$	13,856	$	959	$	12
Federal agencies ¹		25,881		1%		25,881		3,480		-		-
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities ¹		119,637		4%		118,694		9,901		943		2

Subtotal		279,955		10%		278,053		27,237		1,902		14
Corporate obligations:
Industrial		486,880		18%		461,425		43,710		25,455		860
Energy		171,711		6%		171,711		19,131		-		-
Communications and technology		201,393		7%		194,154		16,566		7,239		156
Financial		318,078		12%		250,403		15,155		67,675		5,890
Consumer		496,487		18%		481,033		43,788		15,454		263
Public utilities		296,337		11%		280,475		38,094		15,862		1,366

Subtotal		1,970,886		72%		1,839,201		176,444		131,685		8,535
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities		156,902		6%		53,304		1,856		103,598		12,620
Municipal securities		168,522		6%		164,613		18,316		3,909		61
Other		94,656		4%		38,253		3,576		56,403		9,235
Redeemable preferred stocks		11,221		1%		5,226		226		5,995		740

Fixed maturities		2,682,142		99%		2,378,650		227,655		303,492		31,205
Equity securities		36,689		1%		35,566		1,873		1,123		135

Total	$	2,718,831		100%	$	2,414,216	$	229,528	$	304,615	$	31,340

¹	Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

At December 31, 2011, the Company had $31.3 million in gross unrealized losses on investment securities which were offset by $229.5 million in gross unrealized gains. At June 30, 2012, the Company’s unrealized losses on investment securities had decreased to $22.1 million and were offset by $259.3 million in gross unrealized gains, with 22% of the gross unrealized losses in the category of corporate obligations. The financial sector was the single largest contributor to unrealized losses in this category, reflecting the direct and indirect impact of the troubled residential real estate and mortgage markets. In addition, 39% of the gross unrealized losses were in the category of corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities, also due to the troubled residential real estate and mortgage markets. At June 30, 2012, 92% of the total fair value of the fixed maturities portfolio had unrealized gains, compared to 89% at December 31, 2011.

The Company maintains a high quality securities portfolio. The following table identifies fixed maturity securities available for sale by actual or equivalent Standard & Poor’s rating at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


	June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Fair Value		% of Total		Fair Value		% of Total
AAA	$	133,497		5%	$	161,802		6%
AA		606,522		22%		570,157		21%
A		850,741		30%		799,565		30%
BBB		1,022,645		36%		939,373		35%

Total investment grade		2,613,405		93%		2,470,897		92%
BB		69,852		2%		79,760		3%
B and below		132,993		5%		131,485		5%

Total below investment grade		202,845		7%		211,245		8%

	$	2,816,250		100%	$	2,682,142		100%

The following table provides information regarding fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale with unrealized losses by length of time, at June 30, 2012.


	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government	$	900	$	8	$	779	$	14	$	1,679	$	22
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities ¹		333		-		293		1		626		1

Subtotal		1,233		8		1,072		15		2,305		23
Corporate obligations:
Industrial		24,733		1,727		-		-		24,733		1,727
Energy		9,580		46		-		-		9,580		46
Communications and technology		4,053		28		-		-		4,053		28
Financial		17,959		258		15,610		2,366		33,569		2,624
Consumer		14,480		46		587		7		15,067		53
Public utilities		9,236		74		6,740		411		15,976		485

Subtotal		80,041		2,179		22,937		2,784		102,978		4,963
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities		-		-		70,210		8,694		70,210		8,694
Municipal securities		3,078		18		893		8		3,971		26
Other		-		-		45,185		8,081		45,185		8,081
Redeemable preferred stocks		-		-		3,460		222		3,460		222

Fixed maturity securities		84,352		2,205		143,757		19,804		228,109		22,009

Equity securities		-		-		1,127		130		1,127		130

Total	$	84,352	$	2,205	$	144,884	$	19,934	$	229,236	$	22,139

¹	Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

The following table provides information regarding fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale with unrealized losses by length of time, at December 31, 2011.


	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government	$	-	$	-	$	959	$	12	$	959	$	12
Federal agency issued residential mortgage-backed securities ¹		649		-		294		2		943		2

Subtotal		649		-		1,253		14		1,902		14
Corporate obligations:
Industrial		25,455		860		-		-		25,455		860
Communications and technology		7,239		156		-		-		7,239		156
Financial		51,273		2,107		16,402		3,783		67,675		5,890
Consumer		11,765		119		3,689		144		15,454		263
Public utilities		4,710		344		11,152		1,022		15,862		1,366

Subtotal		100,442		3,586		31,243		4,949		131,685		8,535
Corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities		41,734		2,668		61,864		9,952		103,598		12,620
Municipal securities		-		-		3,909		61		3,909		61
Other		9,257		921		47,146		8,314		56,403		9,235
Redeemable preferred stocks		2,939		115		3,056		625		5,995		740

Fixed maturity securities		155,021		7,290		148,471		23,915		303,492		31,205

Equity securities		69		104		1,054		31		1,123		135

Total	$	155,090	$	7,394	$	149,525	$	23,946	$	304,615	$	31,340

¹	Federal agency securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

Gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity and equity security investments attributable to securities having gross unrealized losses of 12 months or longer were $19.9 million at June 30, 2012, a decrease of 17% from $23.9 million at December 31, 2011. The largest component of this decrease was from the corporate private-labeled residential mortgage-backed securities category, which decreased $1.3 million or 13% during the first six months of 2012. These securities continue to be challenged by the economy and the Company continues to monitor the cash flows on each of these investments.

The following table summarizes the Company’s investments in securities available for sale with unrealized losses at June 30, 2012.


	June 30, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Securities owned without realized impairment:
Unrealized losses of 10% or less	$	104,608	$	102,949	$	1,659
Unrealized losses of 20% or less and greater than 10%		36,702		31,992		4,710

Subtotal		141,310		134,941		6,369

Unrealized losses greater than 20%:
Investment grade
Less than twelve months		4,946		3,766		1,180
Twelve months or greater		908		465		443

Total investment grade		5,854		4,231		1,623

Below investment grade
Less than twelve months		4,273		3,104		1,169
Twelve months or greater		3,010		2,167		843

Total below investment grade		7,283		5,271		2,012

Unrealized losses greater than 20%		13,137		9,502		3,635

Subtotal		154,447		144,443		10,004


Securities owned with realized impairment:
Unrealized losses of 10% or less		33,294		31,815		1,479
Unrealized losses of 20% or less and greater than 10%		40,730		34,841		5,889

Subtotal		74,024		66,656		7,368

Unrealized losses greater than 20%:
Investment grade
Less than twelve months		-		-		-
Twelve months or greater		-		-		-

Total investment grade		-		-		-

Below investment grade
Less than twelve months		1,553		1,240		313
Twelve months or greater		21,351		16,897		4,454

Total below investment grade		22,904		18,137		4,767

Unrealized losses greater than 20%		22,904		18,137		4,767

Subtotal		96,928		84,793		12,135

Total	$	251,375	$	229,236	$	22,139

The following table summarizes the Company’s investments in securities available for sale with unrealized losses at December 31, 2011.


	December 31, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Securities owned without realized impairment:
Unrealized losses of 10% or less	$	154,445	$	151,008	$	3,437
Unrealized losses of 20% or less and greater than 10%		53,042		45,689		7,353

Subtotal		207,487		196,697		10,790

Unrealized losses greater than 20%:
Investment grade:
Less than twelve months		4,946		3,752		1,194
Twelve months or greater		908		450		458

Total investment grade		5,854		4,202		1,652

Below investment grade:
Less than twelve months		8,210		5,977		2,233
Twelve months or greater		-		-		-

Total below investment grade		8,210		5,977		2,233

Unrealized losses greater than 20%		14,064		10,179		3,885

Subtotal		221,551		206,876		14,675


Securities owned with realized impairment:
Unrealized losses of 10% or less		37,639		36,420		1,219
Unrealized losses of 20% or less and greater than 10%		24,789		20,843		3,946

Subtotal		62,428		57,263		5,165

Unrealized losses greater than 20%:
Investment grade:
Less than twelve months		-		-		-
Twelve months or greater		-		-		-

Total investment grade		-		-		-

Below investment grade:
Less than twelve months		29,391		23,178		6,213
Twelve months or greater		22,585		17,298		5,287

Total below investment grade		51,976		40,476		11,500

Unrealized losses greater than 20%		51,976		40,476		11,500

Subtotal		114,404		97,739		16,665

Total	$	335,955	$	304,615	$	31,340

The following table provides information on fixed maturity securities with gross unrealized losses by actual or equivalent Standard & Poor’s rating at June 30, 2012.


	Fair Value		% of Total		Gross Unrealized Losses		% of Total
AAA	$	3,332		1%	$	109		1%
AA		41,735		18%		4,261		19%
A		15,504		7%		484		2%
BBB		56,719		25%		1,983		9%

Total investment grade		117,290		51%		6,837		31%
BB		14,965		7%		1,071		5%
B and below		95,854		42%		14,101		64%

Total below investment grade		110,819		49%		15,172		69%

	$	228,109		100%	$	22,009		100%

The following table provides information on fixed maturity securities with gross unrealized losses by actual or equivalent Standard & Poor’s rating at December 31, 2011.


	Fair Value		% of Total		Gross Unrealized Losses		% of Total
AAA	$	32,245		11%	$	4,475		14%
AA		8,986		3%		125		1%
A		32,550		11%		1,207		4%
BBB		65,557		21%		2,925		9%

Total investment grade		139,338		46%		8,732		28%
BB		45,845		15%		4,063		13%
B and below		118,309		39%		18,410		59%

Total below investment grade		164,154		54%		22,473		72%

	$	303,492		100%	$	31,205		100%

The following is a discussion of all non-residential mortgage-backed securities whose fair value had been less than 80% of amortized cost for at least six consecutive months at June 30, 2012. The Company has considered a wide variety of factors to determine that these positions were not other-than-temporarily impaired.


Security		Description
Financial institution		Institution impacted by housing and mortgage crisis. The security continues to perform within contractual obligations.

Collateralized debt obligation		Impacted by delinquencies and foreclosures in subprime and Alt-A markets and extreme declines in market valuations regardless of individual security performance. There continues to be overcollateralization within the structure and the investment continues to perform within contractual obligations.

Agency mortgage-backed securities that were determined to have such indications at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Discounted future cash flow analysis was performed for each of these securities to determine if any portion of the impairment was due to credit and deemed to be other-than-temporary. The discount rate used in calculating the present value of future cash flows was the investment yield at the time of purchase for each security. The initial default rates were assumed to remain constant over a 24-month time frame and grade down thereafter, reflecting the general perspective of a more stabilized residential housing environment in the future.

The following tables present the range of significant assumptions used in projecting the future cash flows at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The Company believes that the assumptions below are reasonable because they are based upon the actual results of the underlying security collateral.


	June 30, 2012
	Initial Default Rate				Initial Severity Rate				Prepayment Speed
Vintage	Low		High		Low		High		Low		High
2003		4.2%		4.2%		40%		40%		18.0%		18.0%
2004		5.7%		7.7%		40%		55%		8.0%		13.0%
2005		3.4%		15.1%		40%		74%		6.0%		15.0%
2006		4.6%		6.8%		51%		85%		8.0%		16.0%
2007		9.9%		9.9%		65%		65%		8.0%		8.0%


	December 31, 2011
	Initial Default Rate				Initial Severity Rate				Prepayment Speed
Vintage	Low		High		Low		High		Low		High
2003		3.9%		3.9%		40%		40%		18.0%		18.0%
2004		4.9%		7.7%		40%		56%		8.0%		13.0%
2005		3.5%		13.7%		40%		68%		6.0%		15.0%
2006		4.9%		10.0%		52%		90%		8.0%		18.0%
2007		8.8%		8.8%		66%		66%		8.0%		8.0%

Significant unrealized losses on securities can continue for extended periods of time, particularly for certain individual securities. While this can be an indication of potential credit impairments, it can also be an indication of illiquidity in a particular sector or security. In addition, the fair value of an individual security can be heavily influenced by the complexities of varying market sentiment or uncertainty regarding the prospects for an individual security. This has been the situation in the non-U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities market in recent periods. Based upon the process described above, the Company is best able to determine if and to what extent credit impairment may exist in these securities by performing present value calculations of projected future cash flows at the conclusion of each reporting period. By reviewing the most recent data available regarding the security and other relevant industry and market factors, the Company can modify assumptions used in the cash flow projections and determine the best estimate of the portion of any impairment that is due to credit at the conclusion of each period.

The Company closely monitors its investments in securities classified as subprime. Subprime securities include all bonds or portions of bonds where the underlying collateral is made up of home equity loans or first mortgage loans to borrowers whose credit scores at the time of origination were lower than the level recognized in the market as prime. The Company’s classification of subprime does not include Alt-A or jumbo loans, unless the collateral otherwise meets the preceding definition. At June 30, 2012, the fair value of investments with subprime residential mortgage exposure was $16.7 million with a related $2.5 million unrealized loss. At December 31, 2011, the Company had investments with subprime residential mortgage exposure of $17.4 million and a related $3.5 million unrealized loss. This exposure amounted to less than 1% of the Company’s invested assets at both June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. These investments are included in the Company’s process for evaluation of other-than-temporarily impaired securities.

The Company has a significant level of non-U.S. Agency structured securities. Structured securities include asset-backed, residential mortgage-backed securities, along with collateralized debt obligations, collateralized mortgage obligations and other collateralized obligations. The Company monitors these securities through a combination of an analysis of vintage, credit ratings and other factors.

The following tables divide these investment types among vintage and credit ratings at June 30, 2012.


	Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains (Losses)
Residential & Non-agency MBS ¹
Investment Grade:
Vintage 2003 and earlier	$	23,518	$	22,658	$	860
2004		28,996		27,829		1,167
2005		-		-		-
2006		-		-		-
2007		-		-		-

Total investment grade		52,514		50,487		2,027


Below Investment Grade:
Vintage 2003 and earlier		-		-		-
2004		32,865		32,631		234
2005		72,879		83,762		(10,883	)
2006		7,248		6,996		252
2007		3,958		4,544		(586	)

Total below investment grade		116,950		127,933		(10,983	)


Other Structured Securities:
Investment grade		80,886		80,952		(66	)
Below investment grade		3,017		3,238		(221	)

Total other		83,903		84,190		(287	)

Total structured securities	$	253,367	$	262,610	$	(9,243	)

¹	This chart accounts for all vintages owned by the Company.

The following tables divide these investment types among vintage and credit ratings at December 31, 2011.


	Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains (Losses)
Residential & Non-agency MBS: ¹
Investment Grade:
Vintage 2003 and earlier	$	27,700	$	26,974	$	726
2004		29,682		28,693		989
2005		-		-		-
2006		-		-		-
2007		-		-		-

Total investment grade		57,382		55,667		1,715


Below Investment Grade:
Vintage 2003 and earlier		-		-		-
2004		34,497		34,821		(324	)
2005		72,619		87,447		(14,828	)
2006		6,960		7,309		(349	)
2007		3,868		4,864		(996	)

Total below investment grade		117,944		134,441		(16,497	)


Other Structured Securities:
Investment grade		71,793		72,998		(1,205	)
Below investment grade		3,179		3,444		(265	)

Total other		74,972		76,442		(1,470	)

Total structured securities	$	250,298	$	266,550	$	(16,252	)

¹	This chart accounts for all vintages owned by the Company.

Total unrealized losses on non-U.S. Agency structured securities totaled $9.2 million at June 30, 2012, compared to $16.3 million at December 31, 2011. Total unrealized losses on these securities as a percent of total amortized cost totaled 4% at June 30, 2012, an improvement from 6% at year-end 2011.

The Company has written down certain investments in previous periods. Securities written down and continuing to be owned at June 30, 2012 had a fair value of $132.2 million with a net unrealized loss of $9.8 million.

The Company evaluated the current status of all investments previously written-down to assess the ongoing expectations of amounts to be collected. The Company’s evaluation process is similar to its impairment evaluation process. If evidence exists that the Company believes that it will receive all or a materially greater portion of its contractual maturities from securities previously written down, the accretion of income is adjusted. The Company did not change its evaluation of any investments under this process during the first six months of 2012 or 2011.

The Company maintains a diversified investment portfolio, including less than 5% of its investment portfolio in municipal bond securities and 6% in bond securities from foreign issuers. Approximately 60% of the Company’s foreign securities were form issuers in Canada and Australia at June 30, 2012. The Company has no holdings in European sovereign debt and all investments are denominated in U.S. dollars. The fair value of the Company’s securities from foreign issuers at June 30, 2012 was $230.5 million with a net unrealized gain of $14.0 million. This compares to a fair value of $199.5 million with a net unrealized gain of $8.7 million at December 31, 2011.

The Company does not have a material amount of direct or indirect guarantees for the securities in its investment portfolio. The Company did not have any direct exposure to financial guarantors at June 30, 2012. The Company’s indirect exposure to financial guarantors totaled $36.5 million, which was approximately 1% of the Company’s investments at June 30, 2012. The unrealized gain on these investments totaled $2.5 million at June 30, 2012. The Company’s indirect exposure to financial guarantors at December 31, 2011 totaled $36.8 million, which was approximately 1% of the Company’s investments. Total unrealized gains on these investments totaled $1.7 million at December 31, 2011.

Other Revenues

Other revenues consist primarily of supplementary contract considerations; policyholder dividends left with the Company to accumulate; income received on the sale of low income housing tax credit (LIHTC) investments by a subsidiary of the Company; and fees charged on products and sales from the Company’s broker-dealer subsidiary. Other revenues decreased 13% in the second quarter and 11% in the first six months of 2012 compared to the same periods one year earlier. The decreases in both periods reflected lower income from the sale of LIHTC investments. In addition, the decrease in the six months also reflected lower supplementary contract considerations.

Policyholder Benefits

Policyholder benefits consist of death benefits (mortality), immediate annuity benefits, accident and health benefits, surrenders, other benefits, and the associated increase or decrease in reserves for future policy benefits. The largest component of policyholder benefits was death benefits for the periods presented. Death benefits reflect mortality results, after consideration of the impact of reinsurance. Mortality will fluctuate from period to period. However mortality experience has generally remained within pricing expectations for the periods presented.

Policyholder benefits increased $2.4 million or 6% in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period one year earlier. This increase largely resulted from an increase in benefit and contract reserves. Several factors contributed to this increase, including a $2.4 million increase in immediate annuity receipts in the second quarter, which results in a nearly one-for-one increase in benefit and contract reserves. In addition, the change in the fair value of the GMWB rider resulted in a $1.0 million increase in benefit and contract reserves, and the Company recaptured a block of previously reinsured policies that resulted in an increase of $0.8 million in reserves in the second quarter. Partially offsetting the increase in benefit and contract reserves, death benefits, net of reinsurance, decreased $3.0 million in the second quarter of 2012 versus 2011. Also contributing to the decrease in policyholder benefits was a reduction in group dental benefits, as discussed in the Group Insurance segment analysis.

Policyholder benefits decreased $4.4 million or 5% in the first six months compared to the same period one year ago. The largest single factor in the decrease in policyholder benefits resulted from a $7.7 million decline in death benefits, net of reinsurance. Other benefits declined $2.4 million, net of reinsurance, primarily reflecting reduced group accident and health benefits. Partially offsetting these decreases, the Company had an increase in benefit and contract reserves. This increase resulted from several factors, including a $1.2 million increase in immediate annuity receipts and a $0.4 million increase in benefit and contract reserves from the increased value of the GMWB rider. The Company also recaptured a block of previously reinsured policies, which resulted in an increase of $0.8 million in reserves for the six months.

The Company has a GMWB rider for variable annuity contracts that is considered to be a financial derivative and, as such, is accounted for at fair value. The Company determines the fair value of the GMWB rider using a risk-neutral valuation method. The value of the riders will fluctuate depending on market conditions. At June 30, 2012, the fair value of the liability increased $0.5 million compared to the fair value at December 31, 2011. This fluctuation can be attributed to declines in interest rates and issuer discount spreads, partially offset by favorable capital market returns and market volatilities.

Interest Credited to Policyholder Account Balances

Interest is credited to policyholder account balances according to terms of the policies or contracts for universal life, fixed deferred annuities, and other investment-type products. There are minimum levels of interest crediting assumed in certain policies or contracts, as well as allowances for adjustments to be made to reflect current market conditions in certain policies or contracts. Accordingly, the Company reviews and adjusts crediting rates as necessary and appropriate. Amounts credited are a function of account balances and current period crediting rates. As account balances fluctuate, so will the amount of interest credited to policyholder account balances. Interest credited to policyholder account balances decreased 2% in the second quarter and 1% in the first six months of 2012 compared with the same periods one year earlier. While total policyholder account balances have increased during 2012, average crediting rates declined slightly.

Amortization of Deferred Acquisition Costs

The amortization of deferred acquisition costs increased $4.4 million in the second quarter and $2.7 million in the first six months of 2012 compared with the prior year. These increases were primarily the result of unlocking. Unlocking in 2012 resulted in an increase to the DAC asset of $1.3 million and was primarily attributable to refinements in mortality, interest, and persistency assumptions. In 2011, the Company unlocked assumptions that resulted in a change in estimate, increasing the DAC asset $7.8 million. The unlocking was primarily the result of changes in assumptions about future mortality experience, including the use of a new industry mortality table and changes in reinsurance.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses consist of incurred commission expense from the sale of insurance products, net of the deferral of certain commissions and certain expenses directly associated with the attainment of new business; expenses from the Company’s operations; the amortization of VOBA; and other expenses. Operating expenses increased $0.6 million or 2% in the second quarter of 2012 and decreased $1.3 million or 3% in the first six months compared to last year. The increase in the second quarter was largely due to the increase in VOBA amortization, which is discussed below. The decrease in the six months reflected a decline in pension expense and a decline in the amount charged to allowance for doubtful accounts for agent receivables. Partially offsetting these, salaries expense and legal fees increased.

The amortization of VOBA is included in operating expenses. VOBA is amortized with each purchased block of business over a defined period. Generally, as policies run off, the amortization will decline over time. In addition, VOBA is evaluated on an ongoing basis for unlocking adjustments. If necessary, adjustments are made in the current period VOBA amortization. The amortization of VOBA increased $0.8 million or 31% in the second quarter of 2012 and $0.2 million or 4% in the first six months of 2012 compared to the same periods one year earlier. The increase in VOBA amortization during 2012 was largely due to unlocking. The Company had an unlocking adjustment due to the reassessment of interest and mortality margins on certain interest sensitive products which increased the amortization of VOBA $2.4 million in both the second quarter and the first six months of 2012. In comparison, the Company had an unlocking adjustment on certain interest sensitive products which increased the amortization of VOBA $0.9 million in both the second quarter and the six months of 2011. Partially offsetting this, the VOBA associated with the traditional life insurance block from the Old American segment became fully amortized at December 31, 2011, thus resulting in no amortization for this item in 2012 compared to $1.0 million in the first six months of 2011.

Income Taxes

The second quarter income tax expense was $4.5 million or 35% of income before tax for 2012, versus $5.8 million or 34% of income before tax for the prior year period. The income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $14.1 million or 34% of income before tax, versus $8.3 million or 34% of income before tax for the prior year period.

The effective income tax rate was equal to the prevailing corporate federal income tax rate of 35% in the second quarter of 2012. Permanent differences, including the dividends-received deduction, resulted in a benefit of approximately 1% of income before tax. Additionally, investments in affordable housing resulted in a benefit of approximately 1% of income before tax. Offsetting these items was tax expense of approximately 2% of income before tax related to a change in the projected effective tax rate, which was largely based upon historical and year-to-date pretax income.

The effective income tax rate was lower than the prevailing corporate federal income tax rate of 35% in the second quarter of 2011 primarily due to permanent differences, resulting in a benefit of approximately 1% of income before tax.

The effective income tax rate was lower than the prevailing corporate federal income tax rate of 35% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. Permanent differences, including the dividends-received deduction, resulted in a benefit of approximately 1% of income before tax.

Operating Results by Segment

The Company has three reportable business segments, which are defined based on the nature of the products and services offered: Individual Insurance, Group Insurance, and Old American. The Individual Insurance segment consists of individual insurance products for both Kansas City Life and Sunset Life. The Individual Insurance segment is marketed through a nationwide sales force of independent general agents and third-party marketing arrangements. The Group Insurance segment consists of sales of group life, group disability, dental, and vision products. This segment is marketed through a nationwide sales force of independent general agents, group brokers, and third-party marketing arrangements. Old American consists of individual insurance products designed largely as final expense products. These products are marketed through a nationwide general agency sales force with exclusive territories, using direct response marketing to supply agents with leads. For more information, refer to Note 15 – Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Individual Insurance

The following table presents financial data of the Individual Insurance business segment for the second quarters and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:


	Quarter Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Insurance revenues:
Premiums, net	$	4,442		$	1,790		$	7,878		$	6,288
Contract charges		25,590			23,752			50,723			49,986

Total insurance revenues		30,032			25,542			58,601			56,274
Investment revenues:
Net investment income		40,334			41,654			81,455			83,767
Net realized investment gains, excluding impairment losses		1,421			2,017			17,225			2,940
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings:
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses		(177	)		(216	)		(427	)		(450	)
Portion of impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive income		43			52			150			98

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings		(134	)		(164	)		(277	)		(352	)

Total investment revenues		41,621			43,507			98,403			86,355
Other revenues		2,274			2,620			4,413			4,986

Total revenues		73,927			71,669			161,417			147,615


Policyholder benefits		23,009			20,139			42,366			45,024
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		20,377			20,766			40,935			41,247
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs		2,727			(2,214	)		6,737			3,483
Operating expenses		17,635			16,383			32,134			31,928

Total benefits and expenses		63,748			55,074			122,172			121,682


Income before income tax expense		10,179			16,595			39,245			25,933

Income tax expense		3,475			5,658			13,054			8,891

Net income	$	6,704		$	10,937		$	26,191		$	17,042

The net income for this segment in the second quarter of 2012 was $6.7 million, a decrease of $4.2 million from the second quarter of 2011. The decline was primarily the result of increased policyholder benefits, operating expenses, and amortization of deferred acquisition costs, along with lower net investment income. These were partially offset by an increase in insurance revenues.

Net income for this segment was $26.2 million for the first six months of 2012, an increase of $9.1 million from the first six months of 2011. Contributing to this improvement were increases in net realized investment gains and insurance revenues, along with lower policyholder benefits. Partially offsetting these changes was an increase in amortization of deferred acquisition costs.

Total insurance revenues for this segment increased $4.5 million or 18% in the second quarter of 2012 compared with the same period in the prior year. Total premiums increased $2.4 million or 18%, reflecting a $2.4 million increase in immediate annuity premiums. Contract charges increased $1.8 million or 8%, and reinsurance ceded premiums were flat.

Total insurance revenues for this segment increased $2.3 million or 4% for the first six months of 2012 compared to one year earlier. Total premiums increased $1.3 million or 5%, reflecting a $1.2 million or 29% increase in immediate annuity premiums. Contract charges increased $0.7 million and reinsurance ceded premiums were flat.


	Quarter Ended June 30
	2012			% Change			2011			% Change
New premiums:
Individual life insurance	$	1,172			(4	)	$	1,219			(5	)
Immediate annuities		3,460			234			1,037			(77	)

Total new premiums		4,632			105			2,256			(61	)
Renewal premiums		10,591			-			10,607			1

Total premiums		15,223			18			12,863			(21	)
Reinsurance ceded		(10,781	)		(3	)		(11,073	)		(1	)

Premiums, net	$	4,442			148		$	1,790			(65	)


	Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			% Change			2011			% Change
New premiums:
Individual life insurance	$	2,326			(10	)	$	2,589			-
Immediate annuities		5,168			38			3,746			(62	)

Total new premiums		7,494			18			6,335			(49	)
Renewal premiums		21,134			1			21,028			1

Total premiums		28,628			5			27,363			(18	)
Reinsurance ceded		(20,750	)		(2	)		(21,075	)		(1	)

Premiums, net	$	7,878			25		$	6,288			(48	)

Total new premiums for this segment increased $2.4 million in the second quarter of 2012, more than double the total new premiums in the same period one year earlier. This improvement resulted from increased sales of immediate annuities. Immediate annuity receipts can have sizeable fluctuations, as receipts from policyholders largely result from one-time premiums rather than recurring premiums. Total renewal premiums were flat compared to last year.

Total new premiums for this segment increased $1.2 million or 18% in the first six months of 2012 versus the prior year. This improvement also resulted from increased immediate annuities. Total renewal premiums increased 1%, due to higher individual life premiums.

The following table provides detail by new and renewal deposits for the second quarters and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. New deposits are also detailed by product.


	Quarter Ended June 30
	2012		% Change			2011		% Change
New deposits:
Universal life insurance	$	2,857		(24	)	$	3,750		22
Variable universal life insurance		103		(62	)		268		35
Fixed deferred annuities		12,469		(31	)		18,025		58
Variable annuities		4,642		(24	)		6,142		10

Total new deposits		20,071		(29	)		28,185		39
Renewal deposits		35,325		(3	)		36,333		-

Total deposits	$	55,396		(14	)	$	64,518		14


	Six Months Ended June 30
	2012		% Change			2011		% Change
New deposits:
Universal life insurance	$	6,160		(6	)	$	6,562		1
Variable universal life insurance		260		(47	)		493		12
Fixed deferred annuities		31,619		(4	)		32,917		47
Variable annuities		8,603		(14	)		9,979		(13	)

Total new deposits		46,642		(7	)		49,951		22
Renewal deposits		70,217		(3	)		72,031		3

Total deposits	$	116,859		(4	)	$	121,982		10

Total new deposits decreased $8.1 million or 29% in the second quarter of 2012 compared to last year, reflecting a $5.6 million or 31% decrease in new fixed deferred annuity deposits and a $1.5 million or 24% decrease in new variable annuity deposits. Total renewal deposits decreased $1.0 million or 3% in the second quarter of 2012. This decrease was due to a $0.9 million decline in renewal variable annuity deposits. Total new deposits decreased $3.3 million or 7% in the first six months of 2012 compared with the prior year. This decrease reflected a $1.4 million decline in new variable annuity deposits and a $1.3 million decline in new fixed deferred annuity deposits. Total renewal deposits decreased $1.8 million or 3% in the first six months of 2012. This decline resulted from a $2.1 million decrease in renewal variable annuity deposits. New sales and renewals for deposit products have been negatively affected for the second quarter and first six months of 2012 by continuing low interest rates and the uncertain economic environment.

Total contract charges increased $1.8 million or 8% in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011. This largely resulted from an increase in the amortization of deferred revenue. Amortization of deferred revenue increased $1.8 million during the second quarter of 2012 due to unlocking. The unlocking in 2012 was due to changes in the interest and mortality margins that resulted in a decrease to the deferred revenue liability. Conversely, the amortization of deferred revenue decreased $1.8 million during second quarter 2011 due to unlocking. The 2011 unlocking was primarily the result of the implementation of a new industry mortality table and the impact of a system upgrade specific to reinsurance. Total contract charges on the closed blocks equaled 34% of total consolidated contract charges in the second quarter of 2012 compared to 37% in the second quarter of 2011. Total contract charges on closed blocks declined 1% in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. Total contract charges on open blocks of business, where there is ongoing marketing for new sales, increased 13% in the first six months of 2012.

Total contract charges increased $0.7 million in the first six months of 2012 compared to one year earlier, due to the increase in the amortization of deferred revenue described above. In addition to the results discussed above for the quarter, the amortization of deferred revenue increased during 2012 due to a system upgrade that occurred during 2011 that led to enhanced reinsurance modeling capabilities. Partially offsetting this increase was a $0.4 million decrease in both expense loads and cost of insurance charges. The decrease in expense loads resulted from a decline in value of variable annuities held in the separate accounts, reflecting the existing market conditions. The decline in cost of insurance charges was largely due to the runoff of closed blocks. Total contract charges on the closed blocks equaled 35% of total consolidated contract charges in the first six months of 2012 compared to 36% in the first six months of 2011. Total contract charges on closed blocks declined 2% in the first six months of 2012, while total contract charges on open blocks of business increased 4%.

Net investment income decreased $1.3 million or 3% in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011, as an increase in average invested assets was offset by a decline in yields earned. Also, this segment experienced a net realized investment gain of $1.3 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to a net gain of $1.9 million in the second quarter of 2011. Net investment income decreased $2.3 million in the first six months of 2011 compared to one year earlier, as an increase in average invested assets was offset by a decline in yields earned. Also, this segment had a net realized gain of $16.9 million in the first six months of 2012 compared to a net gain of $2.6 million in the first six months of 2011.

Other revenues decreased 13% in the second quarter and 11% in the first six months of 2012 compared to the same periods one year earlier. The decreases in both periods reflected lower income from the sale of LIHTC investments. In addition, the decrease in the six months also reflected lower supplementary contract considerations.

Policyholder benefits increased $2.9 million or 14% in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the prior year. This increase was largely due to an increase in benefit and contract reserves. One contributing factor was a $2.4 million increase in sales of immediate annuities, which results in a nearly one-for-one increase in benefit and contract reserves. In addition, the change in the fair value of the GMWB rider resulted in a $1.0 million increase in benefit and contract reserves, and the Company recaptured a block of previously reinsured policies that resulted in an increase of $0.8 million in reserves in the second quarter. Partially offsetting the increase in reserves, death benefits, net of reinsurance, decreased $2.6 million. This change reflected favorable mortality experience.

Policyholder benefits decreased $2.7 million or 6% in the first six months of 2012 compared to the prior year. Death benefits, net of reinsurance ceded, decreased $6.3 million. Partially offsetting this favorable mortality experience, benefit and contract reserves increased. The reserve increase was largely due to a $1.2 million increase in sales of immediate annuities and a $0.4 million change in the fair value of the GMWB rider, as discussed above. The Company also recaptured a block of previously reinsured policies that resulted in an increase of $0.8 million in reserves for the six months.

Interest credited to policyholder account balances decreased 2% in the second quarter and 1% in the first six months of 2012 compared to the same periods one year earlier. While total policyholder account balances increased in 2012, average crediting rates declined slightly.

The amortization of deferred acquisition costs increased $4.9 million in the second quarter and $3.3 million in the first six months of 2012 compared with the prior year. These increases were largely the result of unlocking. Unlocking in 2012 resulted in an increase to the DAC asset of $1.3 million and was primarily attributable to refinements in mortality, interest, and persistency assumptions. In 2011, the Company unlocked assumptions that resulted in a change in estimate, increasing the DAC asset $7.8 million. The unlocking was primarily the result of changes in assumptions about future mortality experience including the use of a new industry mortality table and change in reinsurance.

Operating expenses consist of incurred commissions, net of the capitalization of commissions, expenses from the Company’s operations, the amortization of VOBA, and other expenses. Operating expenses increased $1.3 million or 8% in the second quarter and $0.2 million or less than 1% in the first six months of 2012 compared with the same periods one year earlier. The largest factor in this increase for both periods was higher amortization of VOBA, as discussed below.

The amortization of VOBA increased $1.3 million or 63% in the second quarter and $1.1 million or 37% in the first six months of 2012 compared to one year earlier. The increase in VOBA amortization during 2012 was largely due to unlocking. The Company had an unlocking adjustment due to the reassessment of interest and mortality margins on certain interest sensitive products which increased the amortization of VOBA $2.4 million in both the second quarter and the first six months of 2012. Comparatively, during the second quarter of 2011, the Company had an unlocking adjustment on certain interest sensitive products which increased the amortization of VOBA $0.9 million in both the second quarter and the six months.

Group Insurance

The following table presents financial data of the Group Insurance business segment for the second quarters and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:


	Quarter Ended June 30					Six Months Ended June 30
	2012		2011			2012			2011
Insurance revenues:
Premiums, net	$	12,197	$	12,246		$	24,264		$	24,800

Total insurance revenues		12,197		12,246			24,264			24,800
Investment revenues:
Net investment income		132		142			260			287
Other revenues		36		38			73			75

Total revenues		12,365		12,426			24,597			25,162


Policyholder benefits		6,591		7,477			13,613			15,084
Operating expenses		5,589		5,183			11,314			10,927

Total benefits and expenses		12,180		12,660			24,927			26,011


Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)		185		(234	)		(330	)		(849	)

Income tax expense (benefit)		64		(82	)		(116	)		(297	)


Net income (loss)	$	121	$	(152	)	$	(214	)	$	(552	)


	Quarter Ended June 30
	2012			% Change			2011			% Change
New premiums:
Group life insurance	$	744			64		$	453			(9	)
Group dental insurance		1,033			3			1,001			(52	)
Group disability insurance		2,105			(10	)		2,332			114
Other group insurance		61			79			34			(13	)

Total new premiums		3,943			3			3,820			3
Renewal premiums		11,599			-			11,640			1

Total premiums		15,542			-			15,460			2
Reinsurance ceded		(3,345	)		4			(3,214	)		45

Premiums, net	$	12,197			-		$	12,246			(5	)


	Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			% Change			2011			% Change
New premiums:
Group life insurance	$	1,225			29		$	947			(16	)
Group dental insurance		1,965			(17	)		2,379			(44	)
Group disability insurance		3,688			(19	)		4,542			106
Other group insurance		90			29			70			(26	)

Total new premiums		6,968			(12	)		7,938			4
Renewal premiums		23,783			6			22,494			3

Total premiums		30,751			1			30,432			3
Reinsurance ceded		(6,487	)		15			(5,632	)		30

Premiums, net	$	24,264			(2	)	$	24,800			(2	)

Total new premiums increased $0.1 million or 3% in the second quarter of 2012 and decreased $1.0 million or 12% in the six months compared with the prior year. New group life premiums increased $0.3 million or 64% in the second quarter and $0.3 million or 29% in the six months. These were partially offset by a decrease in new group disability premiums of $0.2 million or 10% in the second quarter and $0.9 million or 19% in the six months. Also contributing to the decline in the six months, new dental premiums decreased $0.4 million or 17%. Total renewal premiums remained flat in the second quarter and increased $1.3 million or 6% in the six months. The increase in the six months was primarily driven by renewals on the short-term disability product.

The Company uses reinsurance in several of its group product lines to help mitigate risk. Reinsurance premiums increased $0.1 million or 4% in the second quarter and $0.9 million or 15% in the first six months of 2012 compared to the prior year. The increase in the six months was largely due to an increase in short-term disability renewal premiums.

Policyholder benefits consist of death benefits, accident and health benefits, and the associated increase or decrease in reserves for future policy benefits. Policyholder benefits declined $0.9 million or 12% in the second quarter and $1.5 million or 10% in the six months compared to the prior year. These results were largely due to a reduction in the benefits paid for the dental product line. This reduction reflects the changes that this segment made to the dental product line during 2011 to improve profitability, including increased pricing and better claim cost controls.

The policyholder benefit ratio is derived by dividing policyholder benefits, net of reinsurance, by total net premiums. The ratio for the Group Insurance segment was 54% in the second quarter and 56% for the first six months of 2012, compared to 61% in both the second quarter and first six months of 2011. These decreases were primarily the result of the decline in dental benefits previously mentioned. The policyholder benefit ratio for the dental product line decreased from approximately 77% in both the second quarter and first six months of 2011 to approximately 72% in both the second quarter and first six months of 2012.

Operating expenses consist of commissions, fees to third-party marketing and administrative organizations, and expenses from the Company’s operations. Operating expenses increased $0.4 million or 8% in the second quarter and $0.4 million or 4% in the six months. These increases were largely due to higher commission expenses associated with the life and dental products.

Old American

The following table presents financial data for the Old American business segment for the second quarters and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:


	Quarter Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Insurance revenues:
Premiums, net	$	17,664		$	16,899		$	34,964		$	33,607

Total insurance revenues		17,664			16,899			34,964			33,607
Investment revenues:
Net investment income		2,969			3,097			5,929			6,230
Net realized investment gains, excluding impairment losses		(60	)		(124	)		(27	)		(35	)
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings:
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses		(11	)		(22	)		(29	)		(57	)
Portion of impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive income		(1	)		4			-			16

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings		(12	)		(18	)		(29	)		(41	)

Total investment revenues		2,897			2,955			5,873			6,154
Other revenues		2			8			11			13

Total revenues		20,563			19,862			40,848			39,774


Policyholder benefits		11,676			11,249			23,767			24,031
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs		2,394			2,919			6,285			6,806
Operating expenses		3,952			5,066			7,789			9,777

Total benefits and expenses		18,022			19,234			37,841			40,614


Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)		2,541			628			3,007			(840	)

Income tax expense (benefit)		969			240			1,146			(314	)


Net income (loss)	$	1,572		$	388		$	1,861		$	(526	)

Net income for this segment totaled $1.6 million in the second quarter compared to $0.4 million in the prior year. The increase in net income for the second quarter reflected a $0.8 million increase in insurance revenues, a $0.5 million decrease in amortization of DAC and a $1.1 million decrease in operating expenses. These were partially offset by a $0.4 million increase in policyholder benefits and a $0.7 million increase in income tax expense. Net income for the first six months of 2012 was $1.9 million compared to a $0.5 million net loss for the first six months of 2011. The increase in net income in the first six months of 2012 reflected a $1.4 million increase in insurance revenues, a $0.3 million decrease in policyholder benefits, a $0.5 million decrease in the amortization of DAC, and a $2.0 million decrease in operating expenses. These were partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in net investment income and a $1.5 million increase in income tax expense.

The following table presents gross premiums by new and renewal business, less reinsurance ceded, as included in insurance revenues for the second quarters and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.


	Quarter Ended June 30
	2012			% Change			2011			% Change
New individual life premiums	$	3,242			5		$	3,094			10
Renewal premiums		14,941			4			14,396			2

Total premiums		18,183			4			17,490			4
Reinsurance ceded		(519	)		(12	)		(591	)		(16	)

Premiums, net	$	17,664			5		$	16,899			4


	Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			% Change			2011			% Change
New individual life premiums	$	6,444			5		$	6,135			13
Renewal premiums		29,563			3			28,702			2

Total premiums		36,007			3			34,837			4
Reinsurance ceded		(1,043	)		(15	)		(1,230	)		(12	)

Premiums, net	$	34,964			4		$	33,607			4

Total new premiums increased $0.1 million or 5% in the second quarter and $0.3 million or 5% in the six months, while total renewal premiums increased $0.5 million or 4% in the second quarter and $0.9 million or 3% in the six months. The increase in premiums reflects a combination of expanded distribution efforts and improved agency productivity. Old American continues to focus on the recruitment and development of new agencies and agents, along with improved production from existing agencies and agents. In addition, proactive territorial management by agencies and the home office have contributed to the increased sales.

Net investment income decreased $0.1 million or 4% in the second quarter and $0.3 million or 5% in the first six months of 2012 compared with the prior year. These declines were largely due to a reduction in yields available in the market.

Please see Consolidated Results of Operations in Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a table that provides securities that were written down through earnings by business segment for the first two quarters of 2012 and 2011. This section also contains a table that provides detail regarding individual investment securities by business segment that were written down through earnings during the first six months of 2012 and 2011.

Policyholder benefits increased $0.4 million or 4% in the second quarter versus last year. The increase was largely due to an increase in benefit and contract reserves. Policyholder benefits decreased $0.3 million or 1% in the first six months of 2012 compared with the prior year, largely due to lower death benefits. Partially offsetting this change was a $0.7 million increase in reserves. The increase in reserves occurred in the second quarter and six months of 2012, largely from the increase in premiums. Mortality fluctuations occur each period, and the Company monitors these fluctuations in relation to its pricing expectations. While death benefits decreased during the first six months of 2012, the results remained within pricing expectations.

Amortization of DAC decreased $0.5 million or 18% in the second quarter and $0.5 million or 8% in the six months compared to a year ago. The declines were primarily due to the implementation of ASU No. 2010-26, as described in Note 7 – Change in Accounting Principle.

Operating expenses decreased $1.1 million or 22% in the second quarter and $2.0 million or 20% in the six months compared to a year ago. The decreases in both periods were largely due to lower salary and benefit expenses, as well as reduced agent meeting costs. Also contributing to the decreases were lower amortization of VOBA, due to the traditional life insurance block being fully amortized at December 31, 2011. Capitalized commissions increased in the six months, primarily related to the implementation of ASU No. 2010-26, as described in Note 7 – Change in Accounting Principle.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity

Statements made in the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K remain pertinent, as the Company’s liquidity position is materially unchanged from year-end 2011.

Net cash used for operating activities was $2.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012. The primary sources of cash from operating activities in the first six months of 2012 were premium receipts and net investment income. The primary uses of cash from operating activities in the first six months of 2012 were for the payment of policyholder benefits and operating expenses. Net cash used for investing activities was $22.2 million. The primary sources of cash were sales, maturities, calls, and principal paydowns of investments totaling $206.6 million. Included in this total, the Company had sizable real estate sales in the first six months of 2012. Offsetting these, the Company’s new investments totaled $260.6 million. Net cash provided by financing activities was $19.4 million, primarily including $30.1 million of deposits net of withdrawals from policyholder account balances.

Debt and Short-term Borrowing

The Company and certain subsidiaries have access to borrowing capacity through their membership affiliation with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (FHLB). At June 30, 2012, there were no outstanding balances with the FHLB, and there were no outstanding balances at year-end 2011. The Company has access to unsecured revolving lines of credit of $60.0 million with two major commercial banks with no balances outstanding. These lines of credit will expire in June of 2013. The Company anticipates renewing these lines of credit as they come due.

Capital Resources

The Company considers existing capital resources to be adequate to support the current level of business activities. In addition, the Company’s statutory equity exceeds the minimum capital deemed necessary to support its insurance business, as determined by the risk-based capital calculations and guidelines established by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. The Company believes these statutory limitations impose no practical restrictions on its dividend payment plans.

The following table shows the capital adequacy for the Company.


	June 30 2012		December 31 2011
Total assets, excluding separate accounts	$	4,143,798	$	4,081,633
Total stockholders’ equity		737,032		710,705
Ratio of stockholders’ equity to assets, excluding separate accounts		18%		17%

The ratio of equity to assets less separate accounts increased from 17% at December 31, 2011 to 18% at June 30, 2012. Unrealized investment gains on available for sale securities, which are included as a part of stockholders’ equity (net of securities losses, related taxes, policyholder account balances, future policy benefits, and DAC), totaled $93.9 million at June 30, 2012. This represents an increase of $12.8 million in net unrealized gains from the $81.1 million in net unrealized investment gains at year-end 2011. Stockholders’ equity increased $26.3 million from year-end 2011. This improvement was largely due to growth in retained earnings, primarily driven by the increased net income experienced in the first six months of 2012.

The stock repurchase program was extended by the Board of Directors through January 27, 2013 to permit the purchase of up to one million of the Company’s shares on the open market. During the first six months of 2012, the Company purchased 72,126 shares under the stock repurchase program for $2.3 million. The Company made no purchases of stock under this plan in the first six months of 2011.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company purchased 10,699 shares and sold 19,014 shares of treasury stock from the Company’s employee stock ownership plan and deferred compensation plans for a net change in treasury stock of $0.3 million. During the second quarter of 2012, the Company reclassified 188,621 shares from other assets to treasury stock. Please see the discussion of the immaterial correction in Note 1 – Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies for additional information.

On July 23, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share, unchanged from the prior year, which will be paid August 8, 2012 to stockholders of record as of August 2, 2012. Total stockholder dividends paid were $6.1 million and $6.2 million in the first six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

In the most recent reporting periods, financial market volatility and liquidity have shown continued improvement. While the improvement has been fairly broad-based, normal market conditions have not yet returned in all sectors or markets. Periods of volatility and market uncertainty represent a heightened risk for all financial institutions. Such events could negatively affect the Company and policyholder activity, such as a reduction in sales, increased policy surrenders, increased policy loans and reduced earnings. The Company has factored these risks into its risk management processes and its disclosures of financial condition.

Please refer to the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K for a more complete discussion of quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b), Kansas City Life Insurance Company management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. As required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(d), Kansas City Life Insurance Company management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, also conducted an evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the period covered by this report materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there has been no such change during the period covered by this report.

Part II: Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The life insurance industry, including the Company and its subsidiaries, has been subject to an increase in litigation in recent years. Such litigation has been pursued on behalf of purported classes of insurance purchasers, often questioning the conduct of insurers in the marketing of their products.

Similarly, the Company’s retail broker-dealer subsidiary is in an industry that also involves substantial risks of liability. In recent years, litigation and arbitration proceedings involving actions against registered representatives and securities products (including mutual funds, variable annuities, and alternative investments, such as real estate investment products and oil and gas investments) have continued to increase. Given the significant decline in the major market indices beginning in 2008, and the generally poor performance of investments that have historically been considered safe and conservative, there is the potential for an increase in the number of proceedings to which a broker-dealer may be named as a party.

Although no assurances can be given and no determinations can be made at this time, management believes that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these other claims and legal actions would not have a material effect on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial position.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The operating results of life insurance companies have historically been subject to significant fluctuations. The factors which could affect the Company’s future results include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions and the known trends and uncertainties are discussed more fully in the Company’s Risk Factors included in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased Open Market/ Benefit Plans			Average Purchase Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as a Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
1/1/12 - 1/31/12		-	¹	$	-		-		1,000,000
		2,464	²		33.53
2/1/12 - 2/29/12		-	¹		-		-		1,000,000
		1,675	²		34.33
3/1/12 - 3/31/12		-	¹		-		-		1,000,000
		407	²		32.37
4/1/12 - 4/30/12		13,047	¹		31.76		13,047		986,953
		2,870	²		32.13
5/1/12 - 5/31/12		42,382	¹		32.21		42,382		944,571
		3,060	²		32.24
6/1/12 - 6/30/12		16,697	¹		32.19		16,697		927,874
		223	²		33.39

Total		82,825					72,126

¹	On January 23, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock through January 27, 2013.

²	Included in this column are the total shares purchased from employee stock ownership plan sponsored by the Company and the total shares purchased attributable to the Company’s deferred compensation plans during the consecutive months of January through June 2012.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

3520 Broadway, Kansas City, MO 64111

Contact:

Tracy W. Knapp, Chief Financial Officer,

(816) 753-7299, Ext. 8216

For Immediate Release: July 27, 2012, press release reporting financial results for the second quarter of 2012.

Kansas City Life Announces Second Quarter 2012 Results

Kansas City Life Insurance Company recorded net income of $8.4 million or $0.78 per share in the second quarter of 2012, a $2.8 million or $0.19 per share decrease relative to the same quarter in the prior year. Insurance revenues improved $5.2 million or 10% for the period, but this was offset by $6.8 million in increased policyholder benefits and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs. In addition, investment revenues declined $2.0 million or 4%, negatively impacting earnings for the second quarter relative to the prior year.

Net income for the first six months of 2012 was $27.8 million or $2.50 per share, an improvement of $11.9 million or $1.11 per share over the prior year results. This increase was largely the result of net realized investment gains of $16.9 million in the first half of 2012, rising $14.4 million over the first six months of 2011. Also contributing to the improved year-to-date earnings were increased insurance revenues and declines in policyholder benefits and operating expenses.

Insurance revenues increased $5.2 million or 10% in the second quarter of 2012. This increase was largely the result of a $2.6 million increase in new premiums, driven by $2.4 million in increased immediate annuity sales, and a $1.8 million increase in contract charges. The increase in contract charges was largely the result of an unlocking of assumptions that impacted the amortization of deferred revenue from selected universal life-type products.

Insurance revenues increased $3.2 million or 3% in the first six months of 2012, primarily due to a $1.4 million increase in new immediate annuity receipts, a $1.4 million increase in renewal premiums on traditional life insurance products, and a $0.7 million increase in contract charges.

Continued low interest rates and the uncertain economic environment negatively impacted new sales of deposit products, including an $8.1 million or 29% decline in new interest sensitive products in the second quarter versus one year earlier. This included reductions in new universal life deposits of $0.9 million or 24% and new fixed deferred annuities of $5.6 million or 31%. In addition, new variable universal life and annuity deposits declined $1.7 million or 26% in the second quarter. New deposits decreased $3.3 million or 7% in the six months versus the prior year, including a $1.3 million or 4% decrease in new fixed deferred annuities and a $1.6 million or a 15% decrease in variable life and annuity products.

Total investment revenues, including net investment income and net realized investment gains and losses, decreased $2.0 million or 4% in the second quarter compared with the same period in the prior year. This decrease was the result of $1.5 million in reduced net investment income and a $0.5 million decrease in net realized investment gains. Total investment revenues increased $11.7 million in the first six months over the prior year. This increase was the result of $16.2 million in gains on real estate sales, primarily generated in the first quarter of 2012. Net investment income declined $2.6 million or 3% for the six months versus the prior year. The reduced net investment income in both periods was largely due to lower yields on the Company’s primarily fixed-rate investment portfolio.

Policyholder benefits increased $2.4 million or 6% for the second quarter of 2012 compared with the same period one year earlier. This was largely the result of an increase in benefit and contract reserves, reflecting the growth in new immediate annuity receipts and the increased value of policy riders with guaranteed withdrawal benefits. Policyholder benefits decreased $4.4 million or 5% for the six months of 2012 versus the prior period. This decrease reflected favorable mortality, as death benefits declined, along with a reduction in group dental benefits paid, and increased reinsurance of group accident and health products.

The amortization of deferred acquisition costs (DAC) increased $4.4 million in the second quarter of 2012 and $2.7 million for the six months compared to the same periods one year earlier. These increases were largely the result of favorable unlocking of policy assumptions in the second quarter of 2011, which decreased the amortization of DAC in both the second quarter and first six months of last year.

On July 23, 2012, the Kansas City Life Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share that will be paid on August 8, 2012 to stockholders of record on August 2, 2012.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company (NASDAQ: KCLI) was established in 1895 and is based in Kansas City, Missouri. The Company’s primary business is providing financial protection through the sale of life insurance and annuities. The Company’s revenues were $419.0 million in 2011, and assets and life insurance in force were $4.4 billion and $29.2 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2011. The Company operates in 49 states and the District of Columbia. For more information, please visit www.kclife.com.

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

Condensed Consolidated Income Statement (Unaudited)

(amounts in thousands, except share data)


	Quarter Ended June 30				Six Months Ended June 30
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Revenues	$	106,757	$	103,823	$	226,665	$	212,282


Net income	$	8,397	$	11,173	$	27,838	$	15,964


Net income per share, basic and diluted	$	0.78	$	0.97	$	2.50	$	1.39


Dividends paid	$	0.27	$	0.27	$	0.54	$	0.54


Average number of shares outstanding		11,093,397		11,466,948		11,134,834		11,467,044

Item 6. Exhibits

(a)

Exhibits


Exhibit Number:

31(a)		Section 302 Certification.

31(b)		Section 302 Certification.

32		Section 1350 Certification.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		KANSAS CITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
		(Registrant)

/s/ R. Philip Bixby
R. Philip Bixby
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

/s/ Tracy W. Knapp
Tracy W. Knapp
Senior Vice President, Finance

Date: July 27, 2012