Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Proxy Statement Summary

2018 Highlights

We Solidified our Position as a Global Leader in Taste, Scent and Nutrition

2018 was a transformative year for us. We completed our acquisition of Frutarom, creating a global leader in taste, scent and nutrition. Through our acquisition, we significantly increased our product portfolio, including new access to attractive adjacencies, and expanded our customer base to include a significant number of faster-growing small and mid-size customers. We expect that our combined cultures of innovation and partnership will allow us to further capitalize on this expansion and continue to offer our customers innovative and differentiated products. Because our product offerings now extend beyond our legacy Flavors and Fragrances businesses, we have renamed our business units from Flavors to Taste and from Fragrances to Scent, and added Frutarom as a third business unit.

In 2018, we made notable progress in both our strategic goals and financial performance, and achieved currency neutral growth in all of our key metrics. Our financial results in 2018 reflected continued strong results in our legacy business and the addition of Frutarom results in the fourth quarter.

* See reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP financial measures in Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement.

In 2018, our cash returned to shareholders, made largely through dividends and, to a lesser extent share repurchases, totaled $245 million and we increased our quarterly dividend by 6%.

In addition to successfully completing the Frutarom acquisition, we continued to execute on our strategic priorities in 2018, including the following achievements:

Ø    Established our 2025 sustainability goals which focuses on Emission Reductions, Zero Waste to Landfill and Water Stewardship;

Ø    Cosmetic Active Ingredients continued to grow double-digits;

Ø    Tastepoint^SM in North America continued to grow double-digits; and

Ø    Opened two new facilities in China, a flavors manufacturing facility and a natural product research lab, supporting our efforts to become a partner of choice and to grow in the region

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  i

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Our Corporate Governance Policies Reflect Best Practices

ii  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Proposals and Board Recommendations

Proposal 1   Election of 11 Director Nominees				The Board recommends a vote FOR the election of all Director Nominees   Our Nominating and Governance Committee and our Board have determined that each of the nominees possesses the skills and qualifications to collectively comprise a highly effective Board.
				See “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors” beginning on page 1 of this Proxy Statement.

Director Nominees

Committee Membership

Name and Primary Occupation

Joined

Age

Indep.

Audit

Comp.

Nom.& Gov.

Marcello V. Bottoli Partner, Es Vedra Capital Advisors LLP

2007

57

•

Dr. Linda Buck Full Member, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

2007

72

•

•

Michael L. Ducker Former President and CEO, FedEx Freight

2014

65

•

•

David R. Epstein Executive Partner, Flagship Pioneering

2016

57

•

•

Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. President and CEO, TIAA

2010

67

•

John F. Ferraro Former Global COO, Ernst & Young

2015

63

•

Andreas Fibig Chairman and CEO, IFF

2011

57

Christina Gold Former CEO, The Western Union Company

2013

71

•

•

Katherine M. Hudson Former CEO, Brady Corporation

2008

72

•

•

Dale F. Morrison (Lead Director) Founding Partner of Twin Ridge Capital Management

2011

70

•

•

•

Stephen Williamson Senior Vice President and CFO, Thermo Fisher Scientific

2017

52

•

Committee Chair     Financial Expert

Skills and Qualifications

Our Board continuously evaluates desired attributes in light of the Company’s strategy and needs. Key skills, qualifications and experience currently maintained on the Board include:

International and Emerging Markets M&A Operations R&D / Innovation Corporate Governance Sustainability Financial and Accounting Risk and Crisis Management Consumer Products Technology / IT Regulatory

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  iii

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Proposal 2   Ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2019 fiscal year				The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal   Our Board recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2019 fiscal year.
				See “Proposal 2 — Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” beginning on page 35 of this Proxy Statement.

Proposal 3   Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers  in 2018				The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal   Our Board recommends a vote “FOR” the advisory vote to approve executive compensation for the 2018 performance year.
				See “Proposal 3 — Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation” on page 62 of this Proxy Statement and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 39 of this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Governance

Our pay-for-performance compensation program is reflected in the strong compensation governance that we have adopted.

iv  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  v

Proposal 1 Election of Directors

Our Current Board

Our Board of Directors (“Board”) currently has eleven members. Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, our Board has nominated the following current directors for election at the 2019 Annual Meeting, each for a one-year term that expires at the 2020 Annual Meeting:

Director Nominee Experience and Qualifications

Board Membership Criteria and Selection

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that we have at least six but not more than fifteen directors. To ensure independence and to provide the breadth of needed expertise and diversity of our Board, the Board periodically reviews its size and makes appropriate adjustments pursuant to our By-Laws. Our Nominating and Governance Committee, together with other Board members, from time to time, as appropriate, identifies the need for new Board members.

Board candidates are considered based on various criteria which may change over time and as the composition of the Board changes. At a minimum, our Nominating and Governance Committee considers the following factors as part of its review of all director candidates and in recommending potential director candidates:

Proposed director candidates who satisfy the criteria and who otherwise qualify for membership on the Board are identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee. In identifying candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee seeks input and participation from other Board members and other appropriate sources so that all points of view are considered and the best possible candidates identified. The Nominating and Governance Committee also has engaged a search firm to assist it in identifying potential candidates. Members of the Nominating and Governance Committee and other Board members, as appropriate, interview selected director candidates, evaluate the director candidates and determine which candidates are to be recommended by the Nominating and Governance Committee to the Board. Our Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates the suitability of potential candidates nominated by shareholders in the same manner as other candidates recommended to the Nominating and Governance Committee.

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  1

 PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

We believe that each of our nominees has the experience, skills and qualities to fully perform his or her duties as a director and to contribute to our success. Each of our nominees is being nominated because he or she adheres to the highest standards of personal integrity and possesses excellent interpersonal and communication skills, is highly accomplished in his or her field, has an understanding of the interests and issues that are important to our shareholders and is able to dedicate sufficient time to fulfilling his or her obligations as a director. Our nominees as a group complement each other and each other’s respective experiences, skills and qualities.

Diversity and Tenure

Diversity is one of the factors that the Nominating and Governance Committee considers in identifying and selecting director nominees. As part of this process, the Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates how a particular candidate would strengthen and increase the diversity of the Board in terms of how that candidate may contribute to the Board’s overall balance of perspectives, backgrounds, knowledge, experience, skill sets and expertise in substantive matters pertaining to our business. To maintain a balance of experience and new perspectives, our Corporate Governance Guidelines also sets guidance on the number of full annual terms that a director can serve on our Board.

We Strive for a Balanced and Diverse Board

Shareholder Nominations and Proxy Access

Under our By-Laws, if a shareholder wishes to submit a director candidate for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee, or wishes a director nomination to be included in the Company’s proxy statement for an annual meeting pursuant to our proxy access by-law, the shareholder must deliver or mail notice of the request to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, in writing, so that it is received not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the prior year’s annual meeting of shareholders. However, if the annual meeting is not within 30 days of the anniversary date of the prior year’s annual meeting, such notice must be received by the Corporate Secretary no later than 10 days following the mailing of notice of the annual meeting or public disclosure of the annual meeting date, whichever occurs first. The notice must be accompanied by the information concerning the director candidate and nominating shareholder described in Article I, Section 3 and Section 4 of our

2  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

  PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

By-Laws. The Nominating and Governance Committee may also request any additional background or other information from any director candidate or recommending shareholder as it may deem appropriate. Our proxy access by-law permits an eligible shareholder (or group of up to 20 eligible shareholders) who owns shares representing at least 3% of our outstanding shares, and has held the shares for at least 3 years, to nominate and include in our proxy materials for an annual meeting, director candidates constituting up to 20% of our Board.

Continued Service

The Nominating and Governance Committee annually reviews each current Board member’s suitability for continued service as a member of our Board and recommends to the Board whether such member should be re-nominated. In addition, each director is required to promptly tender his or her resignation to the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee if, during his or her tenure as a director, such director

so that the Nominating and Governance Committee can review the change and make a recommendation to the full Board regarding the director’s continued service. Such resignation becomes effective only upon acceptance by the Board.

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  3

 PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Nominees for Director

Marcello V. Bottoli

4  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Dr. Linda Buck

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  5

 PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Michael L. Ducker

6  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

David R. Epstein

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  7

 PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.

8  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

John F. Ferraro

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  9

 PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Andreas Fibig

10  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Christina Gold

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  11

 PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Katherine M. Hudson

12  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Dale F. Morrison

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  13

 PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Stephen Williamson

14  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

Corporate Governance

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) that applies to all of our employees, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and our Chief Accounting Officer. We also have adopted a Code of Conduct for Directors and a Code of Conduct for Executive Officers (together with the Code of Ethics, the “Codes”). The Codes are available through the Investor—Leadership & Governance—Governance link on our website, www.iff.com.

Only the Board or the Audit Committee may grant a waiver from any provision of our Codes in favor of a director or executive officer, and any such waiver and any amendments to the Codes will be publicly disclosed on our website, www.iff.com.

Shareholder Engagement

We regularly engage with our shareholders to better understand their perspectives on our Company, including our strategies, performance, matters of corporate governance and executive compensation. This dialogue has helped inform the Board’s decision-making and ensure our interests remain well-aligned with those of our shareholders. During 2018, we interacted with our largest active shareholders, representing approximately two-thirds of our outstanding shares. We believe that all these engagements provide valuable feedback and this feedback is shared regularly with our Board and its relevant committees. As a result of feedback we received from our shareholders in the past few years, we have, among other things, raised our annual dividend, executed our share repurchase program, pursued value-creating acquisitions, completed a perception study on capital allocation preferences, and increased our investor relations exposure with enhanced marketing in key markets in the United States and across continental Europe.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines which set forth our governance principles relating to, among other things:

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a person that has served for twelve consecutive, full annual terms on our Board cannot continue to serve as a director following the twelfth year of service, unless:

A director’s first full annual term begins on the date he or she is first elected at an annual meeting of shareholders and continues until the next annual meeting of shareholders. Unless a director is an employee of our Company, prior to the conclusion of the twelfth full annual term, the director shall submit his or her resignation as a director effective immediately prior to that year’s annual meeting of shareholders.

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  15

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews our Corporate Governance Guidelines annually, and recommends changes to the Board as appropriate. A copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines is available through the Investor—Leadership & Governance—Governance link on our website, www.iff.com.

Sustainability Initiatives

Our sustainability vision—to lead positive transformational changes toward a regenerative, healthy and abundant world—is based on the concept of a circular economy, one that is restorative and regenerative by design. We are leveraging this mindset to transform how we design and manufacture our products and how we engage our employees, customers, suppliers and communities.

In 2018, IFF was named to Barron’s 100 Most Sustainable Companies, the FTSE4Good Index Series and the Euronext Vigeo World 120. Additional achievements included:

We review our sustainability programs and performance in our annual sustainability report, which is posted on our website for investors, customers and suppliers.

Independence of Directors

The Board undertakes an annual review of director independence, which includes a review of each director’s relationships with the Company. This review is designed to identify and evaluate any transactions or relationships between a director or any member of his or her immediate family and the Company or members of our senior management.

The Board has affirmatively determined that each of our current directors (other than Mr. Fibig, our CEO) meets our independence requirements and those of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards:

In the ordinary course of business, transactions may occur between the Company or members of our senior management and entities with which some of our directors are or have been affiliated. In connection with its evaluation of director independence, our Board reviewed transactions between the Company and any company where our directors or their family members serve as executive officers. Specifically, (i) in the ordinary course of business, we utilize the services of FedEx Freight, of which Mr. Ducker served as President and Chief Executive Officer until his retirement on August 15, 2018 (ii) in the ordinary course of business we purchase services from, and sell products and services to Thermo Fisher Scientific, a life sciences and healthcare technology company, of which Mr. Williamson serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and (iii) one of our executive officers has purchased an immaterial interest in a co-investment vehicle managed by Mr. Bottoli. The Board determined that none of these transactions impaired the independence of the respective director.

16  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

Board Leadership Structure

As stated in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board does not have a policy that requires a separation of the Chairman of the Board (“Chairman”) and CEO positions. The Board believes that it is important to have the flexibility to make this determination from time to time based on the particular facts and circumstances then affecting our business.

Currently, we combine the positions of Chairman and CEO. We believe that the CEO, as the Company’s chief executive, is in the best position to fulfill the Chairman’s responsibilities, including those related to identifying emerging issues facing our Company, and communicating essential information to the Board about our performance and strategies. We also believe that the combined role of Chairman and CEO provides us with a distinct leader and allows us to present a single, uniform voice to our customers, business partners, shareholders and employees. If at any point in time the Board feels that its current leadership structure may be better served by separating the roles of Chairman and CEO, it may then determine to separate these positions.

In order to mitigate potential disadvantages of a combined Chairman and CEO, the Board has created the position of Lead Director to facilitate and strengthen the Board’s independent oversight of our performance, strategy and succession planning and to promote effective governance standards. The independent directors of the Board elect a Lead Director from among the independent directors. Our current Lead Director is Mr. Morrison.

Board Committees

Our Board has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee, each of which operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. Each Committee reviews its charter at least annually and recommends charter changes to the Board as appropriate. In 2018, each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee reviewed its charter, and amended it where appropriate. Each Committee charter provides that the Committee will annually review its performance, and each Committee reviewed and discussed its performance in 2018. A current copy of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee charters is available through the Investor—Leadership & Governance—Governance link on our website, www.iff.com.

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  17

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The table below provides the current membership and chairperson for each of our Committees and identifies our current Lead Director.

Name		Audit		Compensation		Nominating and Governance		Lead Director
Marcello V. Bottoli		●
Dr. Linda Buck						●
Michael L. Ducker				●
David R. Epstein						●
Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.
John F. Ferraro
Christina Gold				●
Katherine M. Hudson				●
Dale F. Morrison		●		●		●		●
Stephen Williamson		●

= Committee Chair

Board and Committee Meetings

Our Board held eight meetings during 2018. The Audit Committee held eight meetings, the Compensation Committee held five meetings and the Nominating and Governance Committee held five meetings during 2018. All incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the total Board and Committee meetings on which he or she served during 2018. All of our directors who were serving on the day of last year’s annual meeting of shareholders attended that meeting. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, unless there are mitigating circumstances, such as medical, family or business emergencies, Board members should endeavor to participate in all Board meetings and all Committee meetings of which the director is a member and to attend our annual meeting of shareholders. Our non-employee directors, all of whom are currently independent, meet in executive session, without the presence of any corporate officer or member of management, in conjunction with regular meetings of the Board and Committees.

18  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

Audit Committee

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  19

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Compensation Committee

20  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  21

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Nominating and Governance Committee

Board and Committee Assessment Process

Each year, the Nominating & Governance Committee leads an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board and each of its committees. Each member of the Board responds to an anonymous survey regarding the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and their leadership, and the dynamics between the Board and management. In 2018, the Board supplemented this process through the use of in-person director interviews. The Lead Director and the Chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee interviewed

22  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

each director to obtain his or her assessment of director performance, Board dynamics and the effectiveness of the Board and its committees. After consulting with each other, the Lead Director and Chair of the Nominating  & Governance Committee summarized and reviewed the results with the Board.

Succession Planning

Our Board recognizes that one of its most important duties is to ensure excellence and continuity in our senior leadership by overseeing the development of executive talent and planning for the effective succession of our Chairman and CEO and other senior members of executive management. As part of this process, our CEO and our executive officers are required to prepare a detailed development and succession plan for themselves and for their direct reports on an annual basis. The Company’s executives regularly attend Board meetings and maintain an ongoing dialogue with Board members, which is critical to the Company’s succession planning. The Compensation Committee reviews, on an annual basis, potential successors for the Company’s executive officers and such other senior management employees as the Compensation Committee may determine. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee also agrees upon and recommends to the Board a succession plan for our CEO, including in emergency situations. Our Board is committed to being prepared for a planned or unplanned change in our leadership in order to ensure our stability.

Risk Management Oversight

Board and Committee Roles in Overseeing Risk

BOARD OF DIRECTORS Oversees and reviews our significant risks Audit Committee Oversees financial risks and the policies and practices established to manage such risks, and also oversees and reviews procedures for monitoring compliance with laws and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Nominating and Governance Committee Oversees governance risk and risks arising with CEO succession. Compensation Committee Oversees risks associated with compensation policies and practice, our compensation plans (including equity compensation plans, severance, change in control and other employment-related matters). MANAGEMENT Manages our day-to-day business risks and risk management process

Our Board is actively involved in the oversight of risks that could affect our Company and is responsible for overseeing and reviewing with management the Company’s enterprise-wide risks and the policies and

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  23

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

practices established to manage such risks. It is the responsibility of the CEO and other senior management to manage the Company’s day-to-day business risks and its risk management process. We believe this division of responsibility is the most effective approach for addressing risk management.

The Board exercises its risk oversight function both at the Board level and through delegation to its committees. The Board and its committees focus on operational risk, financial risk, regulatory risk, litigation risk, cybersecurity and information security risk, tax risk, credit risk, and liquidity risk, as well as our general risk management strategy, and how these risks are being managed. The Board receives updates on the Company’s risk through management’s enterprise risk management (“ERM”) program report to the Board, which includes management’s approach to mitigating and managing such risks. The Board also receives updates on the Company’s risk from its committees. Each of the Audit, Nominating and Governance and Compensation Committee are responsible for the oversight of risks relevant to their function (as described above) and regularly report to the Board. The Board believes that its risk oversight structure allows for open communication between the Board, its committees and management.

Management

Management maintains an ERM program which is designed to identify and assess our global risks and to develop steps to mitigate and manage risks. As part of its risk management practices, the Company has established a management risk committee made up of key members of the Company’s management to integrate global risk activities (including cybersecurity, compliance, business and crisis management) and to ensure appropriate prioritization of resources and alignment across the Company. The Board receives regular reports on the ERM process and the Company’s risk mitigation activities, including an annual report focused on information security risk.

Compensation Risks

In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Compensation Committee, working with its independent compensation consultant, conducted a risk assessment of our executive compensation programs. The goal of this assessment was to determine whether the general structure of our executive compensation policies and programs, annual and long-term performance goals or the administration of the programs posed any material risks to our Company. In addition, with the input of our CHRO, the Compensation Committee reviewed compensation programs and policies below the executive level in a Company-wide risk assessment. The Compensation Committee shared the results of this review with our full Board.

The Compensation Committee determined, based on the reviews of its independent compensation consultant and management’s input and other factors, that the compensation policies and practices for the Company’s employees in 2018, including the established performance goals and incentive plan structures, did not result in excessive risk taking or the implementation of inappropriate business decisions or strategies by the Company’s executives or employees generally, and that there are no risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Related Person Transactions and Other Information

Transactions with Related Persons

In 2018, there were no transactions and there are no currently proposed transactions in excess of $120,000 in which the Company was or will be a participant and in which any director or executive officer of the Company, any known 5% or greater shareholder of the Company or any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest as defined in Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K.

24  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

Related Person Transactions Policy

In accordance with SEC rules, our Board has adopted a written policy for the review and the approval of related person transactions. This policy is available through the Investor-Leadership & Governance-Governance link on our website, www.iff.com. Under the policy, a “related person” is specifically defined as an executive officer, a director, a director nominee, a beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of voting securities, an immediate family member of any of the foregoing, or a controlled entity, which is defined as an entity owned or controlled by any of the foregoing or in which any such person serves as an officer or partner, or together with all of the foregoing persons, owns 5% or more equity interests. The policy defines a “related person transaction” as a transaction or series of transactions involving a related person and the Company, excluding employment arrangements involving an executive officer or other senior officer or employee of the Company and director compensation arrangements. The policy requires that any such transaction be approved or ratified by the Nominating and Governance Committee. If accounting issues are involved in the transaction, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consult with the Audit Committee if deemed appropriate.

Pursuant to the policy, a related person transaction will be approved or ratified only if the Nominating and Governance Committee determines that it is being entered into in good faith and on fair and reasonable terms which are in the best interest of our Company and our shareholders. In determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the following factors, to the extent relevant:

No related person may participate in the review of a transaction in which he or she may have an interest. In addition, except for non-discretionary contributions made pursuant to our matching contributions program, a charitable contribution by our Company to an organization in which a related person is known to be an officer, director or trustee, is subject to approval by the Nominating and Governance Committee. In 2018, there were no related person transactions presented under the policy.

Share Retention Policy

We encourage our executives and directors to own our common stock so that they share the same long-term investment risk as our shareholders. Our Share Retention Policy provides executives and directors flexibility in personal financial planning, yet requires them to maintain ongoing and substantial investment in our common stock.

Under our Share Retention Policy, each executive and director must retain shares of Company common stock at a targeted ownership level. There is no deadline by which an executive or director must meet his or her targeted ownership level. The targeted ownership level for directors is five times the cash portion of the annual retainer (not including any retainer for service as a committee chairperson or lead director). The targeted ownership levels for executives are:

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  25

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

If an executive or director does not meet the targeted ownership level, the executive or director may not sell or transfer any shares held in an equity, a deferred compensation or a retirement plan account provided by the Company, and the executive or director must retain such shares in such accounts until the targeted ownership level is met. For executives, if their retention requirement is not met, the executive is required to retain a portion of any shares of common stock acquired as a result of exercising any stock settled appreciation right (“SSAR”) or as a result of the vesting of restricted stock or a restricted stock unit (“RSU”) (after payment of any exercise price and taxes).

As of March 6, 2019, all of our named executive officers and directors were in compliance with our Share Retention Policy. Additional detail regarding ownership of our common stock by our executive officers and directors is included in this proxy statement under the heading “Securities Ownership of Management, Directors and Certain Other Persons.”

Equity Grant Policy

The Compensation Committee has adopted an Equity Grant Policy with respect to the issuance of equity awards under our equity plans. Under the Equity Grant Policy, the Compensation Committee approves all equity awards to our executive officers (other than our CEO) and certain other members of senior management, and our Board approves all equity awards to our CEO and to our non-employee directors. The grant date for annual awards to all employees and for annual awards to our non-employee directors is the date of the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders. The grant date for awards under our Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) is the date that the Compensation Committee (or Board in the case of our CEO) approves the applicable LTIP metrics. In addition to the annual grants, equity awards may be granted “off-cycle” at other times during the year to new hires, for promotions, retention purposes, director appointments or other special circumstances. The grant price of equity awards (other than LTIP awards) is the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of the grant or, if the grant date is not a business day, the closing price on the NYSE on the following business day. The grant price for LTIP awards is the trailing twenty-day average closing price of our common stock on the NYSE as of the first trading day of the applicable LTIP performance cycle.

Policy Regarding Derivatives, Short Sales, Hedging and Pledges

Under our insider trading policy, directors and all employees, including our named executive officers, are prohibited from entering into transactions designed to hedge against economic risks associated with an investment in our common stock. These individuals may not trade in derivatives in our securities (such as put and call options), effect “short sales” of our common stock, or enter into monetization transactions or similar arrangements (such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars or exchange funds) relating to our securities. These individuals are also prohibited from holding shares of our common stock in margin accounts or pledging shares of our common stock as collateral for a loan.

26  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

Directors Compensation

Director Compensation Program

Annual Director Cash and Equity Compensation

Under our non-employee director compensation program, for the service year from the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2018 Annual Meeting”) to the 2019 Annual Meeting, each non-employee director received an annual retainer of $235,000, of which $112,500 was paid in cash and $122,500 was paid in RSUs issued under our 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (“2015 SAIP”) on the date of the 2018 Annual Meeting. These RSUs vest one year from the grant date and are subject to accelerated vesting upon a change in control. The 874 RSUs granted to each director on the date of the 2018 Annual Meeting was calculated using the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date. Any director who is an employee of our Company does not receive any additional compensation for his or her service as a director.

Compensation for our Lead Director and Committee Chairs

For the service year from the 2018 Annual Meeting to the 2019 Annual Meeting, the Lead Director received an additional annual cash retainer of $20,000, the Chair of the Audit Committee received an additional annual cash retainer of $17,500, the Chair of the Compensation Committee received an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 and the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee received an additional annual cash retainer of $12,500.

Participation in our Deferred Compensation Plan

Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in our Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”). A non- employee director may defer all or a portion of his or her cash compensation as well as any RSUs granted to him or her, subject to tax law requirements. Additional details regarding our DCP may be found in this proxy statement under the heading “Executive Compensation—Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation.” Non-employee directors are not entitled to matching contributions or the 25% premium on deferrals into our common stock fund that are applicable to employees under the DCP.

Additional Benefits

We reimburse our non-employee directors for travel and lodging expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at Board and Committee meetings, our shareholder meetings and other Company-related activities. In addition, our current directors are eligible to participate in our Matching Gift Program. Under this program, we match, on a dollar for dollar basis, contributions made by directors to qualifying charitable organizations up to a maximum of $10,000 per person per year.

Changes for 2019

In October 2018, our Board approved changes to our non-employee director compensation program for the service year beginning with the 2019 Annual Meeting. Beginning in 2019, the annual retainer paid to our non-employee directors will be increased to $250,000, of which $112,500 will be paid in cash and $137,500 will be paid in RSUs. In addition, the annual retainer for each of the Chair of the Audit Committee, Chair of the Compensation Committee and Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee will be increased to $20,000, $17,500 and $15,000, respectively, and the annual retainer for the Lead Director will be increased to $25,000.

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  27

 DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION

The following table details the compensation paid to or earned by our non-employee directors for the year ended December  31, 2018.

2018 Directors’ Compensation

28  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION 

The deferred shares, which are held under the DCP, result from deferral of vested equity grants, voluntary deferral of retainer fees or the crediting of additional share units as a result of reinvestment of dividend equivalents. Deferred shares will be settled by delivery of common stock upon the director’s separation from service on the Board, or as otherwise elected by the director. All of the deferred shares are included for each director in the Beneficial Ownership Table.

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  29

Securities Ownership

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 6, 2019, by each current director, each director nominee, the persons named in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement and all current directors and executive officers as a group. To our knowledge, except as otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership includes sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares.

30  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 SECURITIES OWNERSHIP 

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  31

 SECURITIES OWNERSHIP

5% Shareholders

The following table sets forth information regarding each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, as of March 6, 2019, based on a review of filings with the SEC. Unless otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership is direct.

32  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

Proposal 2 Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Selection of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee of our Board is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm. To execute this responsibility, the Audit Committee engages in a comprehensive annual evaluation of the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence to determine whether the independent registered public accounting firm should be rotated, and considers the advisability and potential impact of selecting a different independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019, and our Board has directed that our management submit that selection for ratification by our shareholders at the 2019 Annual Meeting. PwC has been retained as our external auditor continuously since 1957. In connection with the selection of PwC, the Audit Committee annually reviews and negotiates the terms of the engagement letter entered into with PwC. This letter sets forth important terms regarding the scope of the engagement, associated fees, payment terms, responsibilities of each party and the election of the parties to be subject to binding arbitration in the case of any dispute.

In accordance with SEC rules and PwC policies, audit partners are subject to rotation requirements to limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may provide audit service to our Company. For lead and quality review audit partners, the maximum number of consecutive years of service in that capacity is five years. The process for selection of our lead audit partner pursuant to this rotation policy involves a meeting between the Chair of the Audit Committee and the candidate for the role, as well as discussion by the full Audit Committee and management.

The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interest of the Company and our shareholders, and we are asking our shareholders to ratify the selection of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019. Although ratification is not required by our By-Laws or otherwise, we are submitting the selection of PwC to our shareholders for ratification because we value our shareholders’ views on our Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and as a matter of good corporate governance. The Audit Committee will consider the outcome of our shareholders’ vote in connection with the Audit Committee’s selection of our independent registered public accounting firm in the next fiscal year, but is not bound by the shareholders’ vote. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if it determines that a change would be in the best interests of our Company and our shareholders.

Representatives of PwC are expected to attend the 2019 Annual Meeting, where they will be available to respond to questions and, if they desire, to make a statement.

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  33

 PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table provides detail about fees for professional services rendered by PwC for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures for Audit and Permitted Non-Audit Services

Consistent with requirements of the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee has responsibility for:

In recognition of this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established policies and procedures to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public

34  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

accounting firm to our Company by category, including audit-related services, tax services and other permitted non-audit services. Under the policy, the Audit Committee pre-approves all services obtained from our independent registered public accounting firm by category of service, including a review of specific services to be performed, fees expected to be incurred within each category of service and the potential impact of such services on auditor independence. The term of any pre-approval is for the financial year, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides for a different period in the pre-approval. If it becomes necessary to engage the independent registered public accounting firm for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval, the Audit Committee requires separate pre-approval before engaging the independent registered public accounting firm. To facilitate the process, the policy delegates pre-approval authority to the Audit Committee chairperson to pre-approve services up to $20,000, and the Audit Committee may also delegate authority to one or more of its members to pre-approve services. The Audit Committee member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

All services rendered by PwC to our Company are permissible under applicable laws and regulations. During 2018, all services performed by PwC which were subject to the SEC’s pre-approval requirements were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the Audit Committee’s pre-approval policy in effect during 2018.

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee (“we,” “us” or the “Committee”) operates in accordance with a written charter, which was adopted by the Board. A copy of that charter is available through the Investor—Leadership & Governance—Governance link on the Company’s website at www.iff.com. The Committee is composed of four directors whom the Board has determined are “independent,” as required by the applicable listing standards of the NYSE and the rules of the SEC, and whom qualify as “audit committee financial experts” as defined by the rules of the SEC.

Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), is responsible for performing an integrated audit of the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”).

The Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process and internal control structure on behalf of the Board. We met eight times during 2018, including meeting regularly with PwC and the Company’s internal auditor, both privately and with management present. For 2018, we have reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with management. We have reviewed and discussed with management its process for preparing its report on its assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and at regular intervals we received updates on the status of this process and actions taken by management to respond to issues and deficiencies identified. We discussed with PwC its audit of the financial statements and of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. We discussed with PwC and the Company’s internal auditor the overall scope and plans for their respective audits.

We have discussed with PwC the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees. We also received the written disclosures and the letter from PwC as required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with PwC its independence. We concluded that PwC’s independence was not adversely affected by the non-audit services provided by PwC, the majority of which consisted of audit-related, tax compliance and other tax services arising from our acquisition of Frutarom.

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  35

 PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the Board (and the Board subsequently approved our recommendation) that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019.

In determining whether to retain PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2019 fiscal year, we took into consideration a number of factors, including:

Based on this evaluation, we believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to retain PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2019, which the shareholders will be asked to ratify at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Audit Committee

John F. Ferraro (Chair)

Marcello V. Bottoli

Dale F. Morrison

Stephen Williamson

36  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Reference Guide to our CD&A

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A, describes and analyzes our executive compensation philosophy and program in the context of the compensation paid during the last fiscal year to our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer and each of our three most highly compensated executive officers (collectively referred to as our NEOs). This CD&A is organized as follows:

As discussed in Proposal 3, we are conducting our annual Say on Pay vote that requests your approval of the compensation of our NEOs as described in this section and in the tables and accompanying narrative contained below under “Executive Compensation.” To assist you with this vote, please review our compensation philosophy, the design of our executive compensation programs and how, we believe, these programs have contributed to and are aligned with our performance.

2018 was a transformative year for our Company as we completed the acquisition of Frutarom, becoming a global leader in taste, scent and nutrition. Our acquisition of Frutarom expands our customer base and product offerings, and we believe will accelerate our financial performance. Because the Frutarom acquisition was not completed until the fourth quarter of 2018, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) did not factor the Frutarom acquisition into the 2018 compensation program. Therefore, the 2018 compensation program for our NEOs does not include Frutarom results.

As discussed above, our product offerings have extended beyond our legacy Flavors and Fragrances businesses, therefore, during the fourth quarter of 2018 we renamed our business segments from Flavors to Taste and from Fragrances to Scent, and added Frutarom as a third business segment.

Executive Summary

For 2018, our NEOs were:

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  37

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

Compensation Philosophy

The core of our executive compensation philosophy is that our executives’ compensation should be linked to achievement of financial and operating performance metrics that build shareholder value over both the short- and long-term. As such, we consistently focus on the following key drivers of shareholder value maximization:

Acquisitions Financial Results Return of Capital Increase Shareholder Value

We designed our compensation program to focus on elements that we believe will contribute to these shareholder value drivers. Our compensation program:

Is Variable and Tied to Value Creating Performance Metrics Reflects Each Executive's Level of Responsibility Shareholder Value Includes a Significant Equity Component Rewards Individual Performance and Contributions

38  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

The design of our executive compensation program reflects our belief that executive compensation should be (1) aligned with the achievement of financial and operational metrics for both our Company and the respective business function in which the executive serves and (2) tied to the total shareholder return delivered to our shareholders. The following illustrates how our CEO’s and other NEOs’ total direct compensation is designed to tie a significant portion of their compensation to variable and long-term goals:

CEO Target Opportunity Mix 17% Fixed 83% Variable 24% Variable Short-Term 76% Variable Long-Term 25% Long-Term Cash 75% Long-Term Equity

NEO Average (excluding CEO) Target Opportunity Mix 29% Fixed 71% Variable 30% Variable Short-Term 70% Variable Long-Term 23% Long-Term Cash 77% Long-Term Equity

Our 2018 NEO Compensation Reflects Our 2018 Performance

We achieved strong results in 2018, delivering on all our key financial metrics and completing our acquisition of Frutarom. In 2018, sales were $4.0 billion, including sales related to the Frutarom acquisition, adjusted operating profit was $677 million and adjusted earnings per share was $5.58. As a result of our financial and operational results, (1) our Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) achievement levels were approximately 101.7% for those executive officers evaluated at the corporate level, 66.9% for our Divisional CEO, Scent, and 113.9% for our Divisional CEO, Taste, and (2) our 2016-2018 LTIP payout was approximately 79.1% of target.

In addition to our successful completion of the Frutarom transaction, during 2018, we made significant progress on our strategic objectives, including:

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  39

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

During 2018, we paid $230 million in dividends to our shareholders, increased our quarterly dividend by 6% to $0.73 per share in August, and, before suspending our share repurchase program in connection with the acquisition of Frutarom, we repurchased approximately 108,000 shares of common stock for approximately $15.5 million.

Compensation Governance

To ensure continued alignment of compensation with Company performance and the creation of shareholder value on a long-term, sustainable basis, we maintain strong compensation-related corporate governance policies.

What We Do						What We Don’t Do
		Pay for performance. A significant portion of the compensation for our NEOs is in the form of at-risk variable compensation						No tax gross-ups for severance payments
		Base variable compensation on multiple performance metrics to encourage balanced focus						No single-trigger vesting of cash or equity-based awards upon change in control
		Use an appropriate mix of fixed and variable compensation to reward Company, business unit and individual performance						No short-sales, hedging or pledging of our stock by our employees, officers or directors
		Award a majority of variable compensation as equity-based awards						No fixed-duration employment agreements with executive officers
		Maintain executive clawback policies to recoup cash and equity compensation upon certain triggering events						No stock option/SAR repricing or exchange of underwater options or SARs for cash
		Require our executives to meet share retention guidelines						No guaranteed pay increases or equity awards for NEOs
		Engage an independent compensation consultant
		Conduct an annual risk assessment of our compensation programs

40  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

2018 Compensation Elements and Targeted Mix

Our executive compensation program includes direct and indirect compensation elements.

We believe that direct compensation should be the principal form of compensation. The table below provides a brief description of the principal elements of direct compensation, whether such compensation is fixed or variable, and the compensation program objectives served by each element. From time to time, the Committee may also approve discretionary awards to executives in connection with their initial employment or for extraordinary individual performance, a significant contribution to the Company’s strategic objectives or retention purposes.

The Committee periodically reviews the mix between variable and fixed and short-term and long-term incentive compensation opportunities and between cash and non-cash opportunities based on (1) benchmarking and other external data provided by our independent compensation consultant, (2) recommendations from our independent compensation consultant and (3) recommendations from our CEO and CHRO.

Our indirect compensation elements consist of (1) our Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”) and our Retirement Investment Fund Plan (the “401(k)”) savings plan, (2) a perquisite program, (3) severance and other benefits under our Executive Severance Policy (“ESP”), (4) benefits under an Executive Death Benefit Plan and (5) long-term disability coverage. The Committee regularly reviews the costs and benefits of these programs.

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  41

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

2018 Compensation

Salaries

The Committee reviews the salaries of our NEOs annually, and adjusts salaries periodically. In February 2018, the Committee reviewed the base salaries of our NEOs after consultation with its independent compensation consultant, and effective April 1, 2018, approved salary increases for all NEOs except our CEO, ranging between 2% and 3% to maintain market competitive target total annual compensation levels.

Annual Incentive Plan

During 2018, our AIP compensated our executive officers based on the achievement of certain levels of Company financial performance. Financial performance metrics are measured (1) at the consolidated corporate level for our CEO, CFO, and General Counsel and (2) at both the consolidated corporate level and the business unit level for the Divisional CEO, Scent and Divisional CEO, Taste.

In February 2018, the Committee approved certain changes to the AIP to better align corporate and business unit metrics. For NEOs that are evaluated solely on corporate performance, the 2018 AIP weightings were adjusted to reduce the currency neutral sales growth component from 35% to 30% and increase the working capital component from 15% to 20%. For our NEOs that are evaluated on a combination of business unit and corporate performance, the corporate components now constitute 20% of the overall weighting and the business unit components constitute 80% of the overall weighting. The Committee believes that these changes reflect our focus on profitable growth. In addition, if our Company does not meet the corporate operating profit threshold, then no AIP payouts will be awarded to any participant, including the NEOs.

The performance metrics for the 2018 AIP and their assigned weightings were as follows:

Annual Incentive Program

42  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

Each year the Committee sets an AIP target (stated as a percentage of base salary) for each NEO. For 2018, the Committee maintained the AIP percentage targets at the same level as 2017.

Performance Metrics and Capped AIP Payouts: Based on a review of the annual and long-term financial goals, operational plans, strategic initiatives and the prior year’s actual results, the Committee annually sets the financial performance metrics for our Company and the respective business units that it will use to measure performance as well as the relative weighting that will be assigned to each metric. The Committee then approves threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance metric. Upon achievement of the relative performance level, an executive has the opportunity to earn threshold (25%), target (100%) and maximum (200%) amounts with performance levels achievements in between calculated on a linear basis. The Committee seeks to establish corporate performance goals that are challenging yet attainable.

As discussed above, for 2018 AIP awards, the Committee approved the following four financial performance metrics for the reasons noted below:

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  43

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

Determination of 2018 Performance Levels: In determining our 2018 AIP performance threshold, target and maximum levels, the Committee considered our annual targets for 2018, 2017 actual results and payout trends over the prior three-year and five-year periods. The performance target levels for the financial metrics were set in line with our 2018 budget.

2018 Corporate and Business Unit AIP Performance: Our actual performance against our 2018 AIP corporate financial metrics is set forth in the tables below. In establishing AIP financial performance metrics we took into consideration certain non-operational metrics known to us at the time. In determining actual achievement against those performance metrics, we eliminated the net impact of certain non-core expenses and non-core gains to reflect our fundamental operating results. 2018 LTIP and AIP target performance levels and actual achievement against the target performance levels excluded costs or income associated with (1) adjustments related to operational improvement initiative costs and restructuring charges, (2) the Frutarom acquisition, including unbudgeted operating profit resulting from the inclusion of Frutarom results in the fourth quarter of 2018 and, legal, accounting, consulting and integration expenses, (3) other non-Frutarom acquisition related items, including integration costs, (4) an FDA mandated recall, (5) adjustments due to hyper inflationary accounting for our Argentina subsidiary, (6) the impact of the BASF supply disruption, (7) gains and sales of assets, (8) unbudgeted mark-to-market adjustments related to our Deferred Compensation Plan, and (is) solely with respect to LTIP, charges associated with the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (together, the “2018 non-core items”). Similarly, we excluded the effects of incentive compensation provisions in calculating gross margin performance in order to better focus on the underlying operating performance of our product portfolio. The Committee believes that the necessary self-funding of incentive compensation payments is covered in the operating profit component of the AIP program.

Corporate Performance

The table below reflects the 2018 AIP metrics, their respective targets and the percentage payout earned for each metric and overall by each of Messrs. Fibig and O’Leary and Ms. Chwat, who were evaluated solely on corporate performance.

Corporate Level

Threshold Target Maximum Award Payout as a % of Target 3.2% 4.7% 6.2% Currency Neutral 34.0% Sales Growth Actual 4.9% $619M $652M $684M Operating Profit 42.4% Actual $659 42.7% 44.2% 45.7% Gross Margin 10.0% Actual 43.5% 29.0% 28.6% 27.0% Working Capital 15.3% Actual 28.7% Overall Corporate Payout 101.7%

As indicated above, during 2018, our corporate performance was between target and maximum for the currency neutral sales growth and operating profit performance metrics, and between threshold and target for the gross margin metric and the working capital performance metric. The actual dollar amount earned by each NEO is set forth below under “2018 Individual AIP Payouts.”

44  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

Scent Business Unit Performance

The table below reflects the 2018 AIP metrics, their respective targets and the percentage payout earned for each metric and overall by Mr. Mirzayantz, our Divisional CEO, Scent.

Scent Business Unit

Threshold Target Maximum Award Payout as a % of Target 3.7% 5.2% 6.7% Currency Neutral Sales 18.8% Growth (Business Unit) Actual 4.7% 3.2% 4.7% 6.2% Currency Neutral Sales 5.7% Growth (Corporate) Actual 4.9% $328M $343M $369M Operating Profit 19.9% (Business Unit) Actual $339 $619M $652M $684M Operating Profit 12.1% (Corporate) Actual $659M 42.8% 44.3% 45.8% Gross Margin 6.6% (Business Unit) Actual 43.2% 39.6% 39.1% 36.9% Working Capital 3.8% (Business Unit) Actual 41.1% 29.0% 28.6% 27.0% Working Capital 0.0% (Corporate) Actual 28.7% Overall Payout for Divisional CEO, Scent 66.9%

As indicated above, during 2018, our Scent business unit performance was between threshold and target for the currency neutral sales growth, operating profit and gross margin business unit performance metrics, and below threshold for the working capital business unit performance metric. The actual dollar amount earned by our Divisional CEO, Scent is set forth below under “2018 Individual AIP Payouts.”

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  45

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

Taste Business Unit Performance

The table below reflects the 2018 AIP metrics, their respective targets and the percentage payout earned for each metric and overall by Mr. Haeni, our Divisional CEO, Taste.

Taste Business Unit

Threshold Target Maximum Award Payout as a % of Target 3.4% 4.9% 6.4% Currency Neutral Sales 35.0% Growth (Business Unit) Actual 5.5% 3.2% 4.7% 6.2% Currency Neutral Sales 5.7% Growth (Corporate) Actual 4.9% $370M $387M $416M Operating Profit 36.5% (Business Unit) Actual $400M $619M $652M $684M Operating Profit 12.1% (Corporate) Actual 659M 43.2% 44.7% 46.2% Gross Margin 14.7% (Business Unit) Actual 44.7% 35.8% 35.4% 33.4% Working Capital 6.1% (Business Unit) Actual 35.7% 29.0% 28.6% 27.0% Working Capital 3.8% (Corporate) Actual 28.7% Overall Payout for Divisional CEO, Taste 113.9%

During 2018, our Taste business unit performance was between target and maximum for the currency neutral sales growth and operating profit business unit performance metrics, at target for the gross margin business unit performance metric, and was between threshold and target for the working capital business unit performance metric. The actual dollar amount earned by our Divisional CEO, Taste is set forth below under “2018 Individual AIP Payouts.”

2018 Individual AIP Payouts

The AIP payout for 2018 for our NEOs, based on the actual achievement of each of the performance metrics, is included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement. Based on the Corporate and Business Unit performance outlined in the tables above, 2018 AIP payouts were as follows:

46  IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

Long-Term Incentive Plan

We believe that LTIP awards reward our executive officers, including our NEOs, for financial results and align their interests with the interests of our shareholders. Annually, the Committee reviews the LTIP to determine (1) the metrics that should be used to encourage long-term success, (2) the weightings that should be applied to such metrics and (3) the annual and cumulative targets for such metrics. The Committee believes that commencing a new three-year LTIP cycle each year:

The Committee also annually sets a total LTIP target award for each NEO, which reflects the total LTIP award an NEO has the opportunity to receive at the end of the three-year cycle if we meet all of our targets. Depending upon our actual performance relative to financial and relative total shareholder return goals, the actual payout to the NEO could be greater or less than the total LTIP target award.

Performance Segments.  Given the difficulty in setting long-term goals in the current volatile global economic environments, for 2018 the Committee decided that the LTIP should continue to comprise four performance segments: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3 (each an “annual performance segment”) and cumulative performance over the three-year period (the “cumulative performance segment”).

Performance Metrics.  For 2018, each annual performance segment is measured against Economic Profit (“EP”) (12.5%) and the cumulative performance segment is measured against Relative TSR (62.5%). The Committee believes that a LTIP consisting of annual performance segments based on EP and a cumulative performance segment based on Relative TSR better aligns its compensation objectives with the interests of our shareholders and our focus on long-term growth initiatives. As described below in “2019 Compensation Actions,” for the 2019-2021 LTIP Cycle, annual EP Performance segments will be replaced by a cumulative, three-year net debt ratio to EBITDA ratio performance metric.

Long-Term Incentive Plan

For 2018, the Committee determined that EP was a factor in identifying the sources and drivers of value across our businesses and that EP growth is closely linked to the creation of long-term shareholder value. EP measures operating profitability after considering (1) all our revenues and operating costs, (2) income

IFF  |  2019 PROXY STATEMENT  47

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

taxes and (3) a charge for the capital employed in the business. Capital employed primarily consists of working capital, property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets. The capital charge is determined by applying the estimated weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) to the adjusted average invested capital employed (including charges and/or loss provisions associated with non-operating events such as restructurings and tax or litigation settlements) during the relevant period. The estimated WACC rate is the weighted average cost of our debt and equity capital. In determining the EP target for the 2018 annual performance segments of the current LTIP cycles, the Committee considered our annual targets for 2018, our 2017 actual results and payout trends over the prior three-year and five-year periods, and the pro-forma impact of recent acquisitions. During 2018, our EP goal for the annual performance segments was set at the beginning of each annual performance segment. While the Committee continues to believe that EP is an important metric, in light of the Frutarom acquisition and the company-wide focus on deleveraging by 2021, the Committee decided to replace the three annual EP performance segments with a cumulative three-year performance metric of net debt to EBITDA ratio in addition to the cumulative, three-year Relative TSR for the cumulative segment, which will be weighted equally.

For 2018, the Committee also decided that three-year Relative TSR is a good indicator of our overall long-term performance, and directly ties our executives’ compensation opportunity to our share price appreciation and dividend payments relative to a major large-cap index. Relative TSR is calculated by measuring the change in the market price of stock plus dividends paid (assuming the dividends are reinvested) for our Company and the S&P 500 companies over the three-year performance period. The market price for purposes of calculating the Relative TSR of our Company and the S&P 500 on each cycle-end date is determined based on the average closing price per share of each company’s stock over the period of 20 consecutive trading days preceding that date, as reported by S&P Capital IQ. The Relative TSR goal for the cumulative performance segment is set at the beginning of the three-year cycle.

At the end of each year, the Committee reviews our annual performance and cumulative performance for the newly completed three-year cycle. To the extent that our annual performance has met or exceeded the threshold annual EP goal, the Committee approves “banking” the credit that will be applied to the payout at the end of the three-year cycle. For the completed three-year cycle, the Committee approves the total payout, taking into consideration the performance for each of the prior annual performance segments and the cumulative performance segment.

2018-2020 LTIP Target Awards

In early 2018, the Committee approved the following total LTIP target awards to each of our NEOs for the 2018-2020 LTIP cycle: