Edgar Filing: BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP

BioSpecifics Technologies Corp.: Form 10-Q - Prepared by TNT FIlings Inc.

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________________ to __________________

0-19879
(Commission file number)

BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	11-3054851
(State or Other Jurisdiction	(I.R.S. Employer
of Incorporation or Organization)	Identification No.)

35 Wilbur Street Lynbrook, NY 11563
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

516.593.7000
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o

Non-accelerated filer	o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

Class of Stock	Outstanding August 7, 2009
Common Stock ($.001 par value)	6,081,551

BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
	PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	6
ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis	15
ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	22
ITEM 4T.	Controls and Procedures	22
	PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings	23
ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	23
ITEM 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	23
ITEM 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	23
ITEM 5.	Other Information	24
ITEM 6.	Exhibits	24

Introductory Comments – Terminology

Throughout this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”), the terms “BioSpecifics,” “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. and its subsidiary, Advance Biofactures Corporation (“ABC-NY”).

Introductory Comments – Forward-Looking Statements

This Report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of these provisions, including any projections of earnings, revenues or other financial items, any statements of the plans and objectives of management for future operations, any statements concerning proposed new products or licensing or collaborative arrangements, any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance, and any statement of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” estimates,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements contained in this Report are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations or any of the forward-looking statements will prove to be correct, and actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in the forward-looking statements. Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the risk factors set forth below, and for the reasons described elsewhere in this Report. All forward-looking statements and reasons why results may differ included in this Report are made as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements or reasons why actual results might differ.

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1: Consolidated Financial Statements

BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Consolidated Balance Sheets

		June 30,			December 31,

		2009			2008
		(unaudited)			(audited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,324,499		$	3,494,150
Short-term investments		499,379			900,000
Accounts receivable, net		874,673			6,952,781
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		135,263			67,709
Total current assets		10,833,814			11,414,640
Deferred royalty buy-down		1,250,000			1,250,000
Property, plant and equipment, net		1,453			2,297
Patent costs, net		201,976			164,424
Total assets		12,287,243			12,831,361
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		505,501			642,465
Deferred revenue		1,174,785			1,271,792
Accrued liabilities of discontinued operations		78,138			78,138
Total current liabilities		1,758,424			1,992,395
Accrued third-party development expenses		2,842,262			2,758,595
Long-term deferred revenue		1,526,277			1,901,832
Stockholders' equity:
Series A Preferred stock, $.50 par value, 700,000 shares authorized; none outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 6,168,518 shares and 6,140,068 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively		6,169			6,140
Additional paid-in capital		14,310,300			13,294,803
Accumulated deficit		(7,462,232	)		(6,428,447	)
Treasury stock, 131,267 shares at cost at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008		(693,957	)		(693,957	)
Total stockholders' equity		6,160,280			6,178,539
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	12,287,243		$	12,831,361

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)

		Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
		June 30,						June 30,
		2009			2008			2009			2008
Revenues:
Net sales	$	9,914		$	4,046		$	17,105		$	16,799
Royalties		375,400			2,028			375,400			2,028
Licensing fees		766,281			266,282			1,032,562			532,563
Consulting fees		70,000			162,000			140,000			284,185
Total Revenues		1,221,595			434,356			1,565,067			835,575
Costs and expenses:
Research and development		124,192			94,432			240,063			188,703
General and administrative		1,140,485			1,173,316			2,307,456			1,973,772
Total Cost and Expenses		1,264,677			1,267,748			2,547,519			2,162,475
Operating loss		(43,082	)		(833,392	)		(982,452	)		(1,326,900	)
Other income (expense):
Interest income		1,688			27,528			4,545			57,803
Interest expense		(39	)		-			(39	)		(451	)
Other, net		-			4,527			(9,463	)		4,527
		1,649			32,055			(4,957	)		61,879
Loss before benefit (expense) for income tax		(41,433	)		(801,337	)		(987,409	)		(1,265,021	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		(46,376	)		-			(46,376	)		-
Net loss	$	(87,809	)	$	(801,337	)	$	(1,033,785	)	$	(1,265,021	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.22	)
Shares used in computation of basic and diluted net loss per share		6,014,312			5,796,764			6,011,588			5,715,825

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

BioSpecifics Technologies Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

		Six Months Ended
		June 30,
Cash flows from operating activities:		2009			2008
Net loss	$	(1,033,785	)	$	(1,265,021	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Gain on disposal of fixed asset		-			(4,527	)
Depreciation and amortization		16,312			16,074
Stock-based compensation expense		882,891			737,791
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		6,078,109			6,629
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(67,554	)		(28,788	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(59,942	)		(153,837	)
Deferred revenue		(472,563	)		(472,562	)
Net provided by (used in) operating activities		5,343,468			(1,164,241	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Maturities of marketable securities		900,000			350,000
Purchases of marketable securities		(499,379	)		(750,000	)
Proceeds from sale of fixed asset		-			7,000
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		400,621			(393,000	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock		-			4,882,679
Proceeds from stock option exercises		86,260			230,825
Proceeds from pay-off of notes receivable from former CEO and Chairman		-			1,116,558
Net cash provided by financing activities		86,260			6,230,062
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		5,830,349			4,672,821
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		3,494,150			68,564
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	9,324,499		$	4,741,385
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	-		$	451
Taxes	$	361,228		$	-

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash transactions:

Under our agreement with Auxilium certain patent costs paid by Auxilium on behalf of the Company are creditable against future royalties. As of June 30, 2009 we accrued $242,301 related to this issue of which $40,325 was amortized in the 2009 period and zero in the 2008 comparable period.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2009
(Unaudited)

1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

We are a biopharmaceutical company involved in the development of an injectable collagenase for multiple indications. We have a development and license agreement with Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Auxilium”) for injectable collagenase (which Auxilium has named “XIAFLEX ^TM” (formerly known as “AA4500”)) for clinical indications in Dupuytren’s disease, Peyronie’s disease and frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis), and Auxilium has an option to acquire additional indications that we may pursue, including cellulite and lipomas.

The most advanced indications are for the treatment of Dupuytren’s disease, Peyronie’s disease and frozen shoulder. On June 3, 2004, we entered into a development and license agreement with Auxilium, as amended on May 10, 2005 and December 15, 2005, respectively (the “Prior Auxilium Agreement”), pursuant to which we granted to Auxilium an exclusive worldwide license to develop products containing our injectable collagenase for the treatment of Dupuytren’s disease, Peyronie's disease and frozen shoulder, as well as an exclusive option to develop and license the technology for use in additional indications other than dermal formulations labeled for topical administration.

On December 11, 2008, the parties amended and restated the development and license agreement (the “Auxilium Agreement”), which became effective on December 17, 2008 upon the execution and effectiveness of the Development, Commercialization and Supply Agreement, dated December 17, 2008 (the “Pfizer Agreement”) between Auxilium International Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Auxilium, and Pfizer, Inc. (“Pfizer”), pursuant to which Pfizer will market XIAFLEX for the treatment of Dupuytren’s disease and Peyronie’s disease in Europe and various other territories. The Auxilium Agreement amends and restates in its entirety the Prior Auxilium Agreement.

On April 28, 2009, Auxilium announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) has accepted for filing and granted priority review status to its Biologics License Application (“BLA”) for XIAFLEX. On June 18, 2009, Auxilium announced that the FDA Arthritis Advisory Committee will review XIAFLEX during an advisory committee hearing, tentatively scheduled to take place on September 16, 2009 and that the FDA has not updated the Prescription Drug User Fee Act date of August 28, 2009. On July 31, 2009 Auxilium announced that the FDA Arthritis Advisory Committee confirmed it will review XIAFLEX during an advisory committee hearing in Gaithersburg, MD on September 16, 2009. A notice announcing the meeting was published in the Federal Register on July 31, 2009.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited, but include all adjustments (consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments) which we consider necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position at such dates and the operating results and cash flows for those periods. Although we believe that the disclosures in our financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, certain information normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted (“GAAP”) in the United States (the “U.S.”) has been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for quarterly reporting.

The information included in this Report should be read in conjunction with our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on May 12, 2009 and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the SEC on March 31, 2009.

Principles of Consolidation

The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary, ABC-NY.

Management Estimates

The preparation of unaudited consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires the use of management’s estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities

Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are stated at market value. Cash equivalents include only securities having a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase. The Company limits its credit risk associated with cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities by placing its investments with banks it believes are highly creditworthy.

Fair Value Measurements

SFAS 157 requires expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, but does not require any new fair value measurements. We adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 relating to assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis on January 1, 2008. The adoption of these provisions did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

SFAS 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants based on the highest and best use of the asset or liability. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. SFAS 157 requires us to use valuation techniques to measure fair value that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized as follows:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets
Level 2: Other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or market-corroborated inputs
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data and which require us to develop our own assumptions about how market participants would price the assets or liabilities

The following table sets forth the fair value of our financial assets that were measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009:

		Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,324,499	-	-
U.S Treasuries		499,379	-	-

Auction Rate Securities

As of June 30, 2009 we held no taxable auction rate securities, or ARS. As of December 31, 2008, we held $0.9 million of ARS, which were classified as short-term investments. On January 5, 2009, we received the remaining principal balance of our investment in auction rate securities of $0.9 million.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenues resulting from product sales, royalties, from licensing and use of our technology, and from other services we sometimes perform in connection with the licensed technology under the guidance of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition.”

If we determine that separate elements exist in a revenue arrangement under Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (EITF 00-21), we recognize revenue for delivered elements only when the fair values of undelivered elements are known, when the associated earnings process is complete, when payment is reasonably assured and, to the extent the milestone amount relates to our performance obligation, when our customer confirms that we have met the requirements under the terms of the agreement.

Revenues, and their respective treatment for financial reporting purposes, are as follows:

Product Sales

We recognize revenue from product sales when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, title passes, the price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. No right of return exists for our products except in the case of damaged goods. To date, we have not experienced any significant returns of our products.

Net sales include the sales of the API Enzyme that are recognized at the time the product is shipped to customers for laboratory use.

Royalty/Earn-Out Revenue

We recognize royalties under the earn-out provision of the Asset Purchase Agreement with DFB. We have the right to receive earn out payments in the future based on sales of certain products. Generally, under this agreement we would receive royalty payments and a report within ninety (90) days from the end of each calendar year after the licensee has sold the royalty-bearing product. Our right to receive earn out payments under our agreement with DFB will expire in 2013. We recognize royalty revenues when we can reliably estimate such amounts and collectability is reasonably assured.

License and Sublicense Fees

We include revenue recognized from upfront licensing, sublicensing and milestone payments in “License Fees” in our consolidated statements of operations in this Report.

Upfront License and Sublicensing Fees

We generally recognize revenue from upfront licensing and sublicensing fees when the agreement is signed, we have completed the earnings process and we have no ongoing performance obligation with respect to the arrangement. Nonrefundable upfront technology license for product candidates for which we are providing continuing services related to product development are deferred and recognized as revenue over the development period.

Milestones

Milestones, in the form of additional license fees, typically represent nonrefundable payments to be received in conjunction with the achievement of a specific event identified in the contract, such as completion of specified development activities and/or regulatory submissions and/or approvals. We believe that a milestone represents the culmination of a distinct earnings process when it is not associated with ongoing research, development or other performance on our part. We recognize such milestones as revenue when they become due and collection is reasonably assured. When a milestone does not represent the culmination of a distinct earnings process, we recognize revenue in a manner similar to that of an upfront license fee.

The timing and amount of revenue that we recognize from licenses of technology, either from upfront fees or milestones where we are providing continuing services related to product development, is primarily dependent upon our estimates of the development period. We define the development period as the point from which research activities commence up to regulatory approval of either our, or our partners’ submission assuming no further research is necessary. As product candidates move through the development process, it is necessary to revise these estimates to consider changes to the product development cycle, such as changes in the clinical development plan, regulatory requirements, or various other factors, many of which may be outside of our control. Should the FDA or other regulatory agencies require additional data or information, we would adjust our development period estimates accordingly. The impact on revenue of changes in our estimates and the timing thereof is recognized prospectively over the remaining estimated product development period.

Consulting and Technical Assistance Services

We recognize revenues from a consulting and technical assistance contracts primarily as a result of our agreements with DFB and Auxilium. Consulting revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the contract. The consulting obligations to DFB generally expire during March 2011.

Reimbursable Third Party Development Costs

We accrue expenses to research and development for estimated third party development costs and capitalize certain patent costs that are reimbursable under our agreement with Auxilium. Estimates are based on contractual terms, historical development costs, reviewing third party data and expectations regarding future development for certain products. Further, we monitor the activities and clinical trials of our development partners.

If conditions or other circumstances change, we may take actions to revise our reimbursable third party development cost estimates. These revisions could result in an incremental increase in research and development costs. For example, the Auxilium Agreement provides that Auxilium and BioSpecifics will share equally in third party costs for the development of the lyophilization of the injection formulation and certain patent fees.

On July 13, 2009, we received an updated invoice from Auxilium for approximately $37,000 increasing the total amount due that Auxilium believes is owed by us to approximately $2.84 million through June 30, 2009 under this provision. The increase in the second quarter was primarily due to patent and related legal fees. Based upon the updated invoice, we recorded an additional liability of $37,000 for reimbursable third party patent expenditures.

Based on our preliminary review, we believe that only a portion of the amount charged actually relates to the development of the lyophilization of the injection formulation as well as for patent and related legal fees and, therefore, reserve all rights related to this matter, including but not limited to our right to contest the amount charged by Auxilium.

Actual results have differed in the past, and may differ in the future, from our estimates and could impact our earnings in any period during which an adjustment is made.

Research and Development Expenses

Our research and development (“R&D”) costs are expensed as incurred. R&D includes, but is not limited to, internal costs, such as salaries and benefits, costs of materials, lab expense, facility costs and overhead. R&D also consists of third-party costs, such as medical professional fees, contract manufacturing costs for material used in clinical trials, consulting fees and costs associated with clinical study R&D arrangements. We may fund R&D at medical research institutions under agreements that are generally cancelable. All of these costs are charged to R&D as incurred, which may be measured by percentage of completion, contract milestones, patient enrollment, or the passage of time.

Clinical Trial Expenses

Our cost accruals for clinical trials are based on estimates of the services received and efforts expended pursuant to contracts with various clinical trial centers and clinical research organizations. In the normal course of business we contract with third parties to perform various clinical trial activities in the ongoing development of potential drugs. The financial terms of these agreements are subject to negotiation and vary from contract to contract and may result in uneven payment flows. Payments under the contracts depend on factors such as the achievement of certain events, the successful enrollment of patients, the completion of portions of the clinical trial, or similar conditions. The objective of our accrual policy is to match the recording of expenses in our financial statements to the actual cost of services received and efforts expended. As such, expenses related to each patient enrolled in a clinical trial are recognized ratably beginning upon entry into the trial and over the course of the patient’s continued participation in the trial. In the event of early termination of a clinical trial, we accrue an amount based on our estimate of the remaining non-cancelable obligations associated with the winding down of the clinical trial. Our estimates and assumptions could differ significantly from the amounts that may actually be incurred.

Stock-Based Compensation

Under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), we estimate the fair value of our employee stock awards at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires the use of certain subjective assumptions. The most significant of these assumptions are our estimates of the expected volatility of the market price of our stock and the expected term of the award. When establishing an estimate of the expected term of an award, we consider the vesting period for the award, our recent historical experience of employee stock option exercises (including forfeitures) and the expected volatility. When there is uncertainty in the factors used to determine expected term, we use the simplified method in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 107. As required under the accounting rules, we review our valuation assumptions at each grant date and, as a result, our valuation assumptions used to value employee stock-based awards granted in future periods may change. The weighted-average assumptions used were as follows:

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2009
Stock Option Plans
Expected life, in years	5.0
Risk free interest rate	2.4%
Volatility	59%
Dividend yield	—

Further, SFAS 123(R) requires that employee stock-based compensation costs to be recognized over the requisite service period, or the vesting period, in a manner similar to all other forms of compensation paid to employees. The allocation of employee stock-based compensation costs to each operating expense line are estimated based on specific employee headcount information at each grant date and estimated stock option forfeiture rates and revised, if necessary, in future periods if actual employee headcount information or forfeitures differ materially from those estimates. As a result, the amount of employee stock-based compensation costs we recognize in each operating expense category in future periods may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period.

Stock-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) was as follows:

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2009		2008		2009		2008
Research and development	$	29,728	$	4,979	$	43,644	$	9,957
General and administrative		423,576		574,234		839,247		727,834
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	453,304	$	579,213	$	882,891	$	737,791

Stock Option Activity

A summary of our stock option and warrant activity during the six months ended June 30, 2009 is presented below:

	Total Number			Weighted-Average
Option	of Shares			Exercise Price
Outstanding as of December 31, 2008	1,477,100		$	4.82
Granted	55,000			18.96
Forfeited	-			-
Exercised	(28,450	)	$	3.12
Expired	-			-
Outstanding as of June 30, 2009	1,503,650		$	5.37
Exercisable as of June 30, 2009	1,282,400		$	4.02

During the second quarter of 2009, the Company granted 40,000 stock options to its employees with a four year vesting period at an exercise price of $18.21 and 15,000 stock options to a director with a one year vesting period at an exercise price of $20.95. The total number of outstanding options as of June 30, 2009 was 1,503,650.

The weighted-average grant-date fair value for options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $18.96 and $14.19 per share respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, $86,260 and $230,825 were received from stock options exercised by option holders, respectively.

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable as of June 30, 2009 was approximately $25.4 million. Aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on the closing price of our common stock of $23.83 on June 30, 2009, which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date. Total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2009 was approximately $1.5 million which we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and autos are depreciated on the straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 5 to 10 years. Leasehold improvements are being amortized over the lesser of their estimated useful lives or the remaining life of the lease, which is approximately 1 year.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We adopted Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, Subsequent Events (FAS 165), in the second quarter of 2009. FAS 165 establishes the accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. It requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. The adoption of FAS 165 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standard Codification and the Hierarchy of the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of SFAS No. 162 (SFAS 168), to become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. We do not believe the adoption of SFAS 168 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

3. NET LOSS PER SHARE

In accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” (SFAS 128), basic net loss per share amount is computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods presented, while diluted net loss per share is computed using the sum of the weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding. Common equivalent shares used in the computation of diluted earnings per share result from the assumed exercise of stock options using the converted method. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we incurred a net loss from continuing operations and, as such, we did not include the effect of outstanding stock options in the diluted net loss per share calculations, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

The following table summarizes the number of common equivalent shares excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share from continuing operations reported in the consolidated statement of operations as their effect would have been anti-dilutive:

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

June 30,

2009

2008

2009

2008

Stock options

1,014,917

1,260,813

1,017,570

1,248,372

4. TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Comprehensive loss is comprised of net loss and other comprehensive income. Specifically, we include in other comprehensive income the changes in unrealized gains and losses on our holdings of available-for-sale securities, which are excluded from our net loss. The following table presents the calculation of our comprehensive income (loss):

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
		2009		2008		2009		2008
Net loss	$	87,809	$	801,337	$	1,033,785	$	1,265,021
Other comprehensive loss:
Change in unrealized losses on marketable securities		-		142,184		-		354,572
Total Comprehensive Loss	$	87,809	$	943,521	$	1,033,785	$	1,619,593

5. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following:

		June 30,		December 31,
		2009		2008
Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	329,837	$	409,433
Accrued legal and other professional fees		46,385		117,837
Accrued payroll and related costs		129,279		115,195
Total	$	505,501	$	642,465

6. PATENT COSTS

We amortize intangible assets with definite lives on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, ranging from 5 to 13 years, and review for impairment on a quarterly basis and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable.

As of June 30, 2009, the Company capitalized certain patent costs, paid by Auxilium on behalf of the Company. These costs are reimbursable to Auxilium under our agreement and are creditable against future royalty revenues. Net patent costs consisted of:

		June 30,		December 31,
		2009		2008
Patents	$	201,976	$	164,424

The amortization expense for patents was $15,469, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and zero for the 2008 period. The estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the next five years is approximately as follows:

2010	$31,000
2011	31,000

2012	29,000
2013	27,000
2014	27,000

7. INCOME TAXES

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the expected future tax consequences, using current tax rates, of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the income tax basis of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is applied against any net deferred tax asset if, based on the weighted available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

We account for uncertain tax positions that meet “a more likely than not” threshold in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertain Tax Positions, which requires us to recognize the benefit of uncertain tax positions in our financial statements.

8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On February 1, 2008, the Estate of Edwin H. Wegman (the “Estate”) sold an aggregate of 344,114 shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.001, at a purchase price of $12.00 per share to certain private investors. The Estate used certain of the proceeds of the transaction to repay the loan owed to the Company by Edwin H. Wegman, our former Chairman and CEO. The total loan repayment amount was $1,116,558, which represents the principal amount of $625,774 owed to the Company and accrued interest through January 31, 2008 of $490,784.

As previously reported, Advance Biofactures Corp. (“ABC”, and together, with the Company, the “Tenant”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and Wilbur St. Corp. (the “Landlord”), entered into a Commercial Lease Agreement on January 30, 1998 (the “Commercial Lease Agreement”), pursuant to which the Landlord leased to ABC the premises located at 35 Wilbur Street, Lynbrook, NY 11563 (the “Premises”) for a term of 7 years or until January 31, 2005 and for an annual rental price of $125,000.

As previously reported, the Tenant, without the approval of the board of directors of the Company, and the Landlord entered into an Extension and Modification Agreement on July 1, 2005 (the “Modification Agreement” and together with the Commercial Lease Agreement, the “Lease Agreement”), pursuant to which the term of the Commercial Lease Agreement was extended for an additional 5 years or until June 30, 2010 and the annual rental price for the Premises increased to $150,000.

In connection with the settlement of the previously reported dispute between the Tenant and the Landlord regarding payments of amounts due under the Modification Agreement, the parties entered into a Lease Modification Agreement dated June 22, 2009 and effective as of June 24, 2009 (the “LMA”). Pursuant to the LMA, the Tenant ratified the Lease Agreement, including the Modification Agreement, subject to the terms thereof, and agreed to a $15,000 reduction in the annual rental price of the Premises to $135,000.

The foregoing description of the LMA does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the agreement, which was filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K on June 29, 2009.

9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

None

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report.

Overview

Outlook

We foresee the potential to generate income from limited sources in the next several years. Under the terms of our agreement with DFB, we are scheduled to receive certain contractual anniversary payments and, if DFB exceeds a certain sales target, we would be entitled to an earn out on sales. Under the terms of our agreement with Auxilium, we may receive milestone payments upon their achieving certain regulatory progress and if Auxilium elects to pursue additional indications for injectable collagenase (“Additional Indications”) as well as 8.5% of all sublicense income that Auxilium may receive from Pfizer under the Pfizer Agreement.

Based on our current business model, we expect to have adequate cash reserves until at least the first half of 2012 depending on the amount actually owed to Auxilium, as discussed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors”, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. As a significant portion of our revenues is tied directly to the success of Auxilium in commercializing XIAFLEX, we cannot reasonably forecast our financial condition beyond this time.

Significant Risks

In recent history we have had operating losses and may not achieve sustained profitability. As of June 30, 2009 we had an accumulated deficit from continuing operations of $7,462,232.

We are dependent to a significant extent on third parties, and our principal licensee, Auxilium, may not be able to successfully develop products, obtain required regulatory approvals, manufacture products at an acceptable cost, in a timely manner and with appropriate quality, or successfully market products or maintain desired margins for products sold, and as a result we may not achieve sustained profitable operations.

As of June 30, 2009 we held no taxable auction rate securities, or ARS. As of December 31, 2008, we held $0.9 million of ARS, which were classified as short-term investments. On January 6, 2009, we received the remaining principal balance of our investment in auction rate securities of $0.9 million.

Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of unaudited consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. The information at June 30, 2009 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is unaudited but includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to state fairly the financial information set forth herein. The December 31, 2008 balance sheet amounts and disclosures included herein have been derived from the Company’s December 31, 2008 audited consolidated financial statements. The interim results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2009 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in the notes to our unaudited consolidated financial statements, we believe the following accounting policies to be critical to the judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenues from product sales when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, title passes, the price is fixed and determinable, and payment is reasonably assured. We currently recognize revenues resulting from the licensing, sublicensing and use of our technology and from services we sometimes perform in connection with the licensed technology.

We enter into product development licenses, and collaboration agreements that may contain multiple elements, such as upfront license and sublicense fees, and milestones related to the achievement of particular stages in product development and royalties. As a result, significant contract interpretation is sometimes required to determine the appropriate accounting, including whether the deliverables specified in a multiple-element arrangement should be treated as separate units of accounting for revenue recognition purposes, and if so, how the aggregate contract value should be allocated among the deliverable elements and when to recognize revenue for each element.

We recognize revenue for delivered elements only when the fair values of undelivered elements are known, when the associated earnings process is complete and, to the extent the milestone amount relates to our performance obligation, when our licensee confirms that we have met the requirements under the terms of the agreement, and when payment is reasonably assured. Changes in the allocation of the contract value between various deliverable elements might impact the timing of revenue recognition, but in any event, would not change the total revenue recognized on the contract. For example, nonrefundable upfront product license fees, for product candidates where we are providing continuing services related to product development, are deferred and recognized as revenue over the development period.

Milestones, in the form of additional license fees, typically represent nonrefundable payments to be received in conjunction with the achievement of a specific event identified in the contract, such as completion of specified clinical development activities and/or regulatory submissions and/or approvals. We believe that a milestone represents the culmination of a distinct earnings process when it is not associated with ongoing research, development or other performance on our part. We recognize such milestones as revenue when they become due and payment is reasonably assured. When a milestone does not represent the culmination of a distinct earnings process, we recognize revenue in a manner similar to that of an upfront product license fee.

Royalty/Earn-Out Revenue. We recognize royalties under the earn-out provision of the Asset Purchase Agreement with DFB BioTech, Inc. (“DFB”). We have the right to receive earn out payments in the future based on sales of certain products. Generally, under this agreement we would receive royalty payments and a report within ninety (90) days from the end of each calendar year after the licensee has sold the royalty-bearing product. Our right to receive earn out payments under our agreement with DFB will expire in 2013. We recognize royalty revenues when we can reliably estimate such amounts and collectibility is reasonably assured.

Consulting and Technical Assistance Services. We recognize revenues from a consulting and technical assistance contracts primarily as a result of our agreements with DFB and Auxilium. Consulting revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the contract. The consulting obligations to DFB generally expire during March 2011.

Inventory and Warranty Provisions. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or realizable market value. In assessing the ultimate realization of inventories, we are required to make judgments as to future demand requirements and compare that with the current inventory levels. In March 2006 we sold our topical collagenase business to DFB, including certain product inventory. As of a result of this sale our product inventory as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 was zero.

Reimbursable Third Party Development Costs. We accrue expenses to research and development and capitalize certain patent costs for estimated third party development costs that are reimbursable under our agreement with Auxilium. Estimates are based on contractual terms, historical development costs, reviewing third party data and expectations regarding future development for certain products. Further, we monitor the activities and clinical trials of our development partners.

Based on our preliminary review, we believe that only a portion of the amounts invoiced actually relates to the development of the lyophilization of the injection formulation as well as for patent and related legal fees, and therefore, reserve all rights related to this matter, including but not limited to our right to contest the amount charged by Auxilium.

Actual results have differed in the past, and may differ in the future, from our estimates and could impact our earnings in any period during which an adjustment is made.

Receivables and Deferred Revenue. Under our agreement with DFB, we agreed to provide certain technical assistance and transitional services in consideration of fees and costs totaling over $1.4 million. At the closing, DFB paid to us a partial payment of $400,000 in respect of the technical assistance to be provided by us. To date, we have received a total of $1,200,000 in payments from DFB. The consulting obligations generally expire during March 2011. As of June 30, 2009 the remaining accounts receivable balance due was $200,000 for future services and was offset by the associated deferred revenues to be recognized in future periods of $200,000.

Royalty Buy-Down. In August 2008, we signed an agreement to significantly improve the deal terms related to our future royalty obligations for Peyronie's disease by buying down our future royalty obligations with a one-time cash payment. We modified our agreement to lower future royalties payable on net sales of injectable collagenase, XIAFLEX, for Peyronie's disease. In addition, we agreed to pay certain development milestones, if achieved.

As of June 30, 2009, we capitalized $1,250,000 which will be amortized over approximately five years beginning on the date of the first commercial sale of XIAFLEX, for Peyronie's disease, which represents the period estimated to be benefited, using the straight-line method. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangibles, the Company amortizes intangible assets with finite lives in a manner that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the assets are consumed or otherwise used up. If that pattern cannot be reliably determined, the assets are amortized using the straight-line method.

Stock Based Compensation. Under the provisions of SFAS 123(R), we estimate the fair value of our employee stock awards at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires the use of certain subjective assumptions. The most significant assumptions are our estimates of the expected volatility of the market price of our stock and the expected term of the award. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our common stock. When establishing an estimate of the expected term of an award, we consider the vesting period for the award, our historical experience of employee stock option exercises (including forfeitures) and the expected volatility. As required under the accounting rules, we review our valuation assumptions at each grant date and, as a result, we are likely to change our valuation assumptions used to value employee stock-based awards granted in future periods.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THREE-MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 and 2008

Revenues

Product Revenues, net

Product revenues include the sales of the API Enzyme recognized at the time it is shipped to customers. We recognized a small amount of revenue from the sale of collagenase for laboratory use. For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 product revenues were $9,914 and $4,046, respectively. This increase of $5,868 or 145% was primarily related to the amount of material required to perform testing by our customers.

Royalties

We received all of our royalty revenues from DFB under the earn out payment provision of the Asset Purchase Agreement after certain net sales levels are achieved. Royalty revenues recognized under our agreement with DFB for the three months ended June 30, 2009 were $375,400 and $2,028 in the 2008 period. This increase is mainly related to the increase in net sales during the period reported to us by DFB.

Licensing and Milestone Revenues

For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we recognized licensing and milestone revenue of $766,281 and $266,282, respectively. Licensing revenues recognized are related to the cash payments received under the Auxilium Agreement in prior years and amortized over the expected development period. This increase of $500,000 was related to a milestone received and recognized in the second quarter under our agreement with Auxilium.

Under current accounting guidance, nonrefundable upfront license fees for product candidates where we are providing continuing services related to product development, are deferred and recognized as revenue over the development period. The remaining balance will be recognized over the respective development periods or when we determine that we have no ongoing performance obligations.

Consulting Services

We recognize revenues from consulting and technical assistance contracts primarily as a result of the Asset Purchase Agreement and an Auxilium consulting agreement signed in October 2007 which terminated during the second quarter of 2008. Consulting revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the contract. The consulting obligations under the Asset Purchase Agreement generally expire during March 2011. For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 consulting revenues were $70,000 and $162,000, respectively. This decrease of $92,000 or 57% in was primarily due to the recognition in 2008 of revenues earned in connection with the October 2007 consulting agreement with Auxilium.

Costs and Expenses

Research and Development Activities

Research and development expenses were $124,192 and $94,432 respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. This increase of $29,760 or 32% in research and development expenses was primarily due to certain employee costs which were reimbursable under our agreement with DFB which expired in October 2008 partially offset by decreases in external study development costs.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were $1,140,485 and $1,173,316 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in general and administrative expenses of $32,831 or 3% was primarily due to lower stock-based compensation expense and legal fees partially offset by increases in outside consulting expense and certain facility costs which were reimbursable under our agreement with DFB which expired in October 2008.

Other Income (expense), net

Other income, net, was $1,649 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to other income, net of $32,055 for the 2008 period. Components of other income, net, consist of investment income, interest expense and other, net. Investment income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $1,688 as compared to $27,528 in the comparable period of 2008. This decrease of $25,840 or 94% was primarily due to lower interest rates and invested balances during the 2009 period. Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was minimal in both periods. Other expense, net for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was zero as compared to $4,527 in the 2008 period. The decrease in other expense, net was primarily due to the sale of a company owned vehicle in the 2008 period.

Income Taxes

The expense for income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $46,376 and zero in the comparable period of 2008. The increase was due to tax allowance reserve in connection with the recognition of a deferred tax asset arising from the exercise and sale of employee stock options during the second quarter of 2009.

SIX-MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 and 2008

Revenues

Product Revenues, net

Product revenues include the sales of the API Enzyme recognized at the time it is shipped to customers. We recognized a small amount of revenue from the sale of collagenase for laboratory use. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 product revenues were $17,105 and $16,799, respectively. This increase of $306 or 2% was primarily related to the amount of material required to perform testing by our customers.

Royalties

We received all of our royalty revenues from DFB under the earn out payment provision of the Asset Purchase Agreement after certain net sales levels are achieved. Royalty revenues recognized under our agreement with DFB for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $375,400 and $2,028 in the 2008 period. This increase is mainly related to the increase in net sales during the period reported to us by DFB.

Licensing and Milestone Revenues

For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we recognized licensing and milestone revenue of $1,032,562 and $532,563, respectively. Licensing revenues recognized are related to the cash payments received under the Auxilium Agreement in prior years and amortized over the expected development period. This increase of $500,000 was related to a milestone received and recognized in the second quarter under our agreement with Auxilium.

Consulting Services

We recognize revenues from consulting and technical assistance contracts primarily as a result of the Asset Purchase Agreement and an Auxilium consulting agreement signed in October 2007 which terminated during the second quarter of 2008. Consulting revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the contract. The consulting obligations under the Asset Purchase Agreement generally expire during March 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 consulting revenues were $140,000 and $284,185, respectively. This decrease of $144,185 or 51% in was primarily due to the recognition in 2008 of revenues earned in connection with the October 2007 consulting agreement with Auxilium.

Costs and Expenses

Research and Development Activities

Research and development expenses were $240,063 and $188,703 respectively, for the six months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. This increase of $51,360 or 27% in research and development expenses was primarily due to certain employee costs which were reimbursable under our agreement with DFB which expired in October 2008 and stock-based compensation expense partially offset by decreases in external study development costs.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were $2,307,456 and $1,973,772 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in general and administrative expenses of $333,684 or 17% was primarily due to outside consulting services, stock-based compensation expense, certain facility costs which were reimbursable under our agreement with DFB which expired in October 2008, employee costs and patent related fees partially offset by a decrease in legal fees.

Other Income (expense), net

Other expense, net, was $4,957 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to other income, net of $61,879 for the 2008 period. Components of other income, net, consist of investment income, interest expense and other, net. Investment income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $4,545 as compared to $57,803 in the comparable period of 2008. This decrease of $53,258 was primarily due to lower interest rates and invested balances during the 2009 period. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was minimal in both periods. Other expense, net for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $9,463 as compared to other income, net of $4,527 in the 2008 period. The change in other income and expense, net was primarily due to a penalty related to our delinquent tax filings from previous periods partially offset by the sale of a company owned vehicle in the 2008 period.

Income Taxes

The expense for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $46,376 and zero in the comparable period of 2008. The increase was due to tax allowance reserve in connection with the recognition of a deferred tax asset arising from the exercise and sale of employee stock options during the second quarter of 2009.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

To date, we have financed our operations primarily through product sales, debt instruments, licensing revenues, royalties under agreements with third parties and sales of our common stock. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents in the aggregate of $9,324,499 and $3,494,150, respectively.

Continuing Operations

Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $5,343,468 as compared to net cash used in operating activities in the 2008 period of $1,164,241. In the 2009 period, as compared to the 2008 period, the changes in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily attributable to a the reduction in accounts receivable due to the receipt of a payment for a sublicense fee of $6.4 million and non-cash stock compensation expense partially offset by increased expenses during the period 2009 period.

Net cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $400,621 as compared to net cash used in investing activities in the 2008 period of $393,000. The change in net cash provided by investing activities for the 2009 period reflect redemption of our investment in marketable securities compared to cashed used in investing activities related to purchases of marketable securities in the 2008 period.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $86,260 as compared to the 2008 period of $6,230,062. The change in net cash provided by financing activities for the 2009 consisted of proceeds received from stock option exercises and excess tax benefits related to the sale by employees of certain stock options. Net cash provided by financing activities in the 2008 period consisted of proceeds from the sale of our common stock of $4,882,679, repayment of an outstanding loan from our former Chairman and CEO of $1,116,558 and proceeds received from stock option exercises of $230,825.

Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not applicable.

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of Thomas L. Wegman, the Company’s President, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on that evaluation, management has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Furthermore, our controls and procedures can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the control, and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected on a timely basis.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on June 17, 2009 at the offices of Bingham McCutchen LLP in New York, New York, in accordance with the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders sent on or about April 30, 2009. The tables below present the voting results of the matters voted upon by our stockholders at the meeting:

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

At the meeting, each of the nominees listed below was elected to our Board of Directors to serve as director until the end of his or her respective term and received the number votes set forth after their respective names below.

Nominee*	Number of Shares
	For	Withheld
Thomas L. Wegman	5,480,342	158,335
Dr. Paul Gitman	3,955,424	1,683,253
Dr. Matthew Geller	5,463,026	175,651

_____________
* The Board is divided into three classes, each of which serves for a term of three years, with only one class of directors being elected in each year. Each director holds office for the term for which elected and until his or her successor shall be elected and shall qualify and be subject to such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal. The term of office of the first class of directors, presently consisting of Thomas L. Wegman, Dr. Paul A. Gitman and Dr. Matthew Geller, is scheduled to expire at the annual meeting for the year 2012; the term of office of the second class of directors, presently consisting of Henry Morgan and Michael Schamroth is scheduled to expire on the date of the annual meeting for the year 2010; and the third class of directors, consisting of Toby Wegman and Dr. Mark Wegman is scheduled to expire at the 2011 Annual Meeting.

Proposal 2: Approval of Amended and Restated BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. 2001 Stock Option Plan

At the meeting, our stockholders ratified by the vote set forth below the approval of the Amended and Restated BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. 2001 Stock Option Plan to extend the term of the 2001 Plan from April 6, 2011 to April 23, 2019 and to authorize an additional 300,000 shares of our common stock for issuance under the 2001 Plan from 1,750,000 shares reserved for issuance under the Original 2001 Plan to 2,050,000.

Number of Shares
For	Against	Abstain
4,089,921	287,588	48,755

The number of shares of our common stock eligible to vote as of the record date of April 23, 2009 was 6,014,801 shares.

Item 5. Other Information

On June 15, 2009, Hapoalim Securities USA, Inc. initiated analyst coverage on the Company.

On June 17, 2009, as disclosed on our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 19, 2009 that upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an increase in the base salary of the Company’s President, Thomas Wegman, from $250,000 to $300,000 per year, effective June 17, 2009.

On June 29, 2009, the Company announced that it was added to the Russell 3000 and Russell 2000 Indexes effective at the close of the U.S. markets on June 29, 2009. The Russell 3000 Index measures the performance of the largest 3000 U.S. companies representing approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. The Russell 2000 Index measures the performance of the small-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Russell 2000 Index is a subset of the Russell 3000® Index representing approximately 8% of the total market capitalization of that index. It includes approximately 2,000 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership.

Item 6. Exhibits

	3.1	Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003).
	3.2	Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003).
	4	Amended and Restated BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. 2001 Stock Option Plan (and incorporated by reference to Appendix D to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on April 30, 2009).
	10	Lease Modification Agreement dated June 22, 2009 and effective June 24, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8- K filed with the SEC on June 29, 2009).
	31*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
	32*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	99.1*	Audit Committee Charter (revised June 17, 2009)
	99.2*	Compensation Committee Charter (revised June 17, 2009)
	99.3*	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter (revised June 17, 2009)

_________
* filed herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
(Registrant)

Date: August 12, 2009	/s/ Thomas L. Wegman
	Thomas L. Wegman
	President
	(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)