1.
|
The growth of electricity output of the Company was affected by the slowdown of the national economy which led to the growth of the nationwide and society-wide electricity consumption lower than that anticipated at the beginning of the year.
|
2.
|
As a result of the distribution of installed generation capacity of the Company, the growth rate of power output of the regions where the power plants of the Company are located was relatively low during the first half of the year and certain regions even recorded negative growth. At the same time, hydropower recorded a big growth in certain provinces and the electricity output of local thermal generating units decreased substantially.
|
3.
|
The average growth rate of installed capacity of the Company was below the nationwide average level during the first half of the year.
|
4.
|
According to the national energy saving and emission reduction requirements, the Company arranged denitrification transformation for a greater number of generating units during the first half of the year and it has affected the Company’s power generation growth to a certain extent.
|
Domestic Power Plant
|
Power
generation
for the first half year of 2013
|
Power
generation
for the first half year of 2012
|
Change
|
Electricity
sold for the first half year of 2013
|
Electricity
sold for the first half year of 2012
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||||
Liaoning Province
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dalian
|
3.009 | 2.961 | 1.62 | % | 2.863 | 2.819 | 1.56 | % | |||||||||||||||
Dandong
|
1.568 | 1.602 | –2.12 | % | 1.495 | 1.527 | –2.10 | % | |||||||||||||||
Yingkou
|
3.803 | 4.163 | –8.65 | % | 3.567 | 3.900 | –8.54 | % | |||||||||||||||
Yingkou Co-generation
|
1.587 | 1.777 | –10.69 | % | 1.486 | 1.666 | –10.80 | % | |||||||||||||||
Wafangdian
Wind Power
|
0.063 | 0.055 | 14.55 | % | 0.061 | 0.054 | 12.96 | % | |||||||||||||||
Suzi River Hydropower
|
0.008 | 0.001 | 700.00 | % | 0.008 | 0.001 | 700.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Changtu Wind Power
|
0.048 | — | — | 0.048 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Inner Mongolia
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Huade Wind Power
|
0.116 | 0.110 | 5.45 | % | 0.115 | 0.109 | 5.50 | % | |||||||||||||||
Hebei Province
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Shang’an
|
6.726 | 7.345 | –8.43 | % | 6.324 | 6.834 | –7.46 | % | |||||||||||||||
Kangbao Wind Power
|
0.039 | 0.028 | 39.29 | % | 0.036 | 0.027 | 33.33 | % | |||||||||||||||
Gansu Province
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Pingliang
|
5.031 | 5.249 | –4.15 | % | 4.812 | 4.960 | –2.98 | % | |||||||||||||||
Jiuquan Wind Power
|
0.417 | 0.392 | 6.38 | % | 0.413 | 0.382 | 8.12 | % | |||||||||||||||
Beijing
|
Domestic Power Plant
|
Power
generation
for the first half year of 2013
|
Power
generation
for the first half year of 2012
|
Change
|
Electricity
sold for the first half year of 2013
|
Electricity
sold for the first half year of 2012
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||||
Beijing Co-generation
(Coal-fired)
|
2.412 | 2.371 | 1.73 | % | 2.131 | 2.082 | 2.35 | % | |||||||||||||||
Beijing Co-generation
(Combined Cycle)
|
2.253 | 1.450 | 55.38 | % | 2.198 | 1.412 | 55.67 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tianjin
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Yangliuqing
Co-generation
|
3.591 | 3.404 | 5.49 | % | 3.353 | 3.163 | 6.01 | % | |||||||||||||||
Shanxi Province
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Yushe
|
1.434 | 1.995 | –28.12 | % | 1.326 | 1.842 | –28.01 | % | |||||||||||||||
Zuoquan
|
3.306 | 2.791 | 18.45 | % | 3.104 | 2.617 | 18.61 | % | |||||||||||||||
Shandong Province
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dezhou
|
7.182 | 7.649 | –6.11 | % | 6.743 | 7.183 | –6.13 | % | |||||||||||||||
Jining
|
2.446 | 2.490 | –1.77 | % | 2.272 | 2.310 | –1.65 | % | |||||||||||||||
Xindian
|
1.578 | 1.822 | –13.39 | % | 1.473 | 1.709 | –13.81 | % | |||||||||||||||
Weihai
|
4.997 | 5.139 | –2.76 | % | 4.756 | 4.889 | –2.72 | % | |||||||||||||||
Rizhao Phase II
|
3.298 | 4.037 | –18.31 | % | 3.131 | 3.824 | –18.12 | % | |||||||||||||||
Zhanhua Co-generation
|
0.783 | 0.898 | –12.81 | % | 0.722 | 0.819 | –11.84 | % | |||||||||||||||
Henan Province
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Qinbei
|
9.806 | 8.195 | 19.66 | % | 9.265 | 7.731 | 19.84 | % | |||||||||||||||
Jiangsu Province
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Nantong
|
4.036 | 4.510 | –10.51 | % | 3.850 | 4.309 | –10.65 | % | |||||||||||||||
Nanjing
|
1.698 | 1.922 | –11.65 | % | 1.609 | 1.814 | –11.30 | % | |||||||||||||||
Taicang
|
5.340 | 6.100 | –12.46 | % | 5.086 | 5.810 | –12.46 | % | |||||||||||||||
Huaiyin
|
3.457 | 3.647 | –5.21 | % | 3.251 | 3.438 | –5.44 | % | |||||||||||||||
Jinling
(Combined-cycle)
|
1.053 | 1.995 | –47.22 | % | 1.030 | 1.951 | –47.21 | % | |||||||||||||||
Jinling (Coal-fired)
|
6.242 | 5.347 | 16.74 | % | 5.956 | 5.096 | 16.88 | % |
Domestic Power Plant
|
Power
generation
for the first half year of 2013
|
Power
generation
for the first half year of 2012
|
Change
|
Electricity
sold for the first half year of 2013
|
Electricity
sold for the first half year of 2012
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||||
Qidong Wind Power
|
0.179 | 0.162 | 10.49 | % | 0.175 | 0.158 | 10.76 | % | |||||||||||||||
Shanghai
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Shidongkou First
|
3.873 | 3.985 | –2.81 | % | 3.655 | 3.769 | –3.02 | % | |||||||||||||||
Shidongkou Second
|
3.317 | 3.414 | –2.84 | % | 3.190 | 3.283 | –2.83 | % | |||||||||||||||
Shanghai
Combined-cycle
|
0.793 | 0.528 | 50.19 | % | 0.775 | 0.515 | 50.49 | % | |||||||||||||||
Shidongkou Power
|
4.053 | 3.743 | 8.28 | % | 3.873 | 3.561 | 8.76 | % | |||||||||||||||
Chongqing
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Luohuang
|
6.735 | 5.875 | 14.64 | % | 6.223 | 5.437 | 14.46 | % | |||||||||||||||
Zhejiang Province
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Yuhuan
|
12.082 | 11.470 | 5.34 | % | 11.509 | 10.913 | 5.46 | % | |||||||||||||||
Hubei Province
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Enshi Maweigou
Hydropower
|
0.024 | 0.027 | –11.11 | % | 0.023 | 0.026 | –11.54 | % | |||||||||||||||
Hunan Province
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Yueyang
|
3.745 | 3.804 | –1.55 | % | 3.502 | 3.553 | –1.44 | % | |||||||||||||||
Xiangqi Hydropower
|
0.174 | 0.052 | 234.62 | % | 0.171 | 0.052 | 228.85 | % | |||||||||||||||
Jiangxi Province
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Jinggangshan
|
4.023 | 4.103 | –1.95 | % | 3.844 | 3.908 | –1.64 | % | |||||||||||||||
Fujian Province
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fuzhou
|
5.739 | 5.713 | 0.46 | % | 5.457 | 5.412 | 0.83 | % | |||||||||||||||
Guangdong Province
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Shantou Coal-fired
|
2.526 | 3.081 | –18.01 | % | 2.393 | 2.920 | –18.05 | % | |||||||||||||||
Haimen
|
7.740 | 6.414 | 20.67 | % | 7.401 | 6.132 | 20.69 | % | |||||||||||||||
Yunnan Province
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Diandong Energy
|
4.711 | 5.392 | –12.63 | % | 4.355 | 4.982 | –12.59 | % |
Domestic Power Plant
|
Power
generation
for the first half year of 2013
|
Power
generation
for the first half year of 2012
|
Change
|
Electricity
sold for the first half year of 2013
|
Electricity
sold for the first half year of 2012
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||||
Yuwang Energy
|
2.442 | 2.965 | –17.64 | % | 2.238 | 2.738 | –18.26 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
149.483 | 150.173 | –0.46 | % | 141.268 | 141.637 | –0.26 | % | |||||||||||||||
By Order of the Board
Huaneng Power International, Inc.
Du Daming
Company Secretary
|
Cao Peixi
|
Shao Shiwei
|
(Executive Director)
|
(Independent Non-executive Director)
|
Huang Long
|
Wu Liansheng
|
(Non-executive Director)
|
(Independent Non-executive Director)
|
Li Shiqi
|
Li Zhensheng
|
(Non-executive Director)
|
(Independent Non-executive Director)
|
Huang Jian
|
Qi Yudong
|
(Non-executive Director)
|
(Independent Non-executive Director)
|
Liu Guoyue
|
Zhang Shouwen
|
(Executive Director)
|
(Independent Non-executive Director)
|
Fan Xiaxia
|
|
(Executive Director)
|
|
Shan Qunying
|
|
(Non-executive Director)
|
|
Guo Hongbo
|
|
(Non-executive Director)
|
|
Xu Zujian
|
|
(Non-executive Director)
|
|
Xie Rongxing
|
|
(Non-executive Director)
|
HUANENG POWER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
|
|
By /s/ Du Daming
|
|
Name: Du Daming
|
|
Title: Company Secretary
|