Edgar Filing: WSI INDUSTRIES, INC.

wsi_def14a-010312.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o		Preliminary Proxy Statement
o		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ		Definitive Proxy Statement
o		Definitive Additional Materials
o		Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

WSI Industries, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þ	No fee required.
o	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
	(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:



	(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:



	(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):



	(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:



	(5)	Total fee paid:

o	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
	(1)	Amount Previously Paid:



	(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:



	(3)	Filing Party:



	(4)	Date Filed:

WSI INDUSTRIES, INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

January 3, 2013

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of WSI Industries, Inc. will be held at its offices at 213 Chelsea Road, Monticello, Minnesota, 55362, on Thursday, January 3, 2013, at 1:00 p.m., local time, for the following purposes:

To elect five directors to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors are elected.

To ratify the appointment of Schechter Dokken Kanter Andrews & Selcer Ltd. as independent public accountants for the fiscal year ending August 25, 2013.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on November 6, 2012, as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.

	By Order of the Board of Directors



	Michael J. Pudil,
	Chairman

Minneapolis, Minnesota

December 3, 2012

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!

REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON, PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES IN ONE OF THE WAYS DESCRIBED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE. SHAREHOLDERS WHO ATTEND THE MEETING MAY REVOKE THEIR PROXIES AND VOTE IN PERSON IF THEY SO DESIRE.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING AVAILABILITY

OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE

2013 Annual MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 3, 2013

WSI Industries, Inc. is providing access to its proxy materials both by sending you this full set of proxy materials and by notifying you of the availability of its proxy materials on the Internet.

You may access the following proxy materials as of the date they are first mailed to our shareholders at www.wsiindustries.com by following the link for “Investor Relations” and then “Annual Meeting Materials”:

—

Notice of 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Thursday, January 3, 2013;

—

Proxy Statement for 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Thursday, January 3, 2013; and

—

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2012.

These proxy materials are available free of charge and will remain available through the conclusion of the Annual Meeting. Additionally, we will not collect information, such as “cookies,” that would allow us to identify visitors to the site.

WSI INDUSTRIES, INC.

213 Chelsea Road

Monticello, MN 55362

PROXY STATEMENT

Solicitation of Proxies

This proxy statement is furnished to the shareholders of WSI Industries, Inc. (“we” or “us” or “WSI Industries”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on January 3, 2013, or any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof. Our offices are located at 213 Chelsea Road, Monticello, Minnesota 55362 and our telephone number is (763) 295-9202. The mailing of this proxy statement to our shareholders commenced on or about December 3, 2012.

Cost and Method of Solicitation

The cost of this solicitation will be borne by WSI Industries. In addition to solicitation by mail, our officers, directors and employees may solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile or in person. We may also request banks and brokers to solicit their customers who have a beneficial interest in our common stock registered in the names of nominees and will reimburse such banks and brokers for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

Quorum and Voting

We currently have only one class of securities, common stock, of which 2,903,787 shares were issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the close of business on November 6, 2012. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on November 6, 2012 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Each share is entitled to one vote and shareholders have cumulative voting rights in connection with the election of directors in the event any shareholder gives written notice of intent to cumulate votes to any officer of WSI Industries before the Annual Meeting or to the presiding officer at the Annual Meeting. A shareholder may cumulate votes for the election of directors by multiplying the number of votes to which the shareholder may be entitled by five (the number of directors to be elected) and casting all such votes for one nominee or distributing them among any two or more nominees. In the event that there is cumulative voting, the proxies shall have the authority and discretion to vote the shares cumulatively for any nominee or nominees for whom authority to vote has not been withheld and to cast the votes in their discretion among any nominee(s) for whom authority to vote has not been withheld.

All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person. Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting, please grant a proxy to vote as promptly as possible in order to ensure your representation at the meeting. To grant your proxy, you may complete, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy by mail or follow the enclosed instructions to grant a proxy to vote by means of telephone or the Internet.

Even if you have given your proxy, you may still vote in person if you attend the Annual Meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting, you must bring to the meeting a letter from the broker, bank or other nominee confirming your beneficial ownership of the shares. Additionally, in order to vote at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain from the record holder a proxy issued in your name.

If you sign and return the proxy card on time, the individuals named on the proxy card will vote your shares as you have directed. If you just sign and submit your proxy card without voting instructions, your shares will be voted “FOR” each director nominee and “FOR” each of the other proposals.

If you are a street name holder and you do not return your voting form to your broker, no votes will be cast on your behalf for Proposal 1, the election of directors. This is sometimes called a “broker non-vote.” Your broker will be entitled to vote in its discretion on Proposal 2, the ratification of Schechter Dokken Kanter Andrews & Selcer Ltd. as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2013. Shareholders of WSI Industries who own shares of common stock through a bank or brokerage are sometimes called “street name” holders. Street name holders should review the additional information below under “Casting Your Vote as a Street Name Holder.”

Quorum and Vote Requirements

Under Minnesota law, a quorum, consisting of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote at this 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, must be present in person or by proxy before action may be taken at the Annual Meeting. Votes cast by proxy or in person at this Annual Meeting will determine whether or not a quorum is present.

“Broker non-votes,” or shares held by brokers who do not have discretionary authority to vote on a particular matter and who have not received voting instructions from their customers, are not counted or deemed to be present or represented for the purpose of determining whether shareholders have approved that matter, but they are counted as present for the purposes of determining the existence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Abstentions will be treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, but as unvoted for purposes of determining the approval of the matter submitted to the shareholders for a vote.

A director nominee will be elected if approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the voting power of the shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote for the election of directors. You may either vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” authority to vote for each nominee for the Board of Directors, which is Proposal 1. If you withhold authority to vote for the election of one of the directors, it has the same effect as a vote against that director. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on any other proposal. If you vote “ABSTAIN” on any proposal, it has the same effect as a vote against the proposal.

Proposal 2: Appointment of Independent Auditors generally must be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a greater of: (a) a majority of the voting power of the shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on that item of business or (b) a majority of the voting power of the minimum number of shares that would constitute a quorum.

So far as our management is aware, no matters other than those described in this proxy statement will be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. In the event that any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting calling for a vote of shareholders, the persons named as proxies in the enclosed form of proxy will vote in accordance with their best judgment on such other matters.

Casting Your Vote as a Street Name Holder

If you hold your shares through a broker (that is, in “street name”) and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote.

As of January 1, 2010, brokers no longer have discretionary authority to vote their customers’ shares in an election of directors unless those customers give the brokers instructions on how to vote. As a result, if you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, no votes will be cast on your behalf in the election of directors of WSI Industries. Because of this change in broker voting rules, all street name holders are urged to provide instructions to their brokers on how to vote their shares in the election of directors at the Annual Meeting.

Make your vote count! Instruct your broker how to cast your vote!

If you hold your shares in street name, your broker will continue to have discretion to vote any uninstructed shares on Proposal 2: Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Auditors.

Revoking a Proxy

You may change your vote and revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted by:

Sending a written statement to that effect to the Secretary of WSI Industries;

Submitting a properly signed proxy card with a later date;

If you voted by telephone or through the Internet, by voting again either by telephone or through the Internet prior to the close of the voting facility; or

Voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

All shares represented by valid, unrevoked proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof. Our principal offices are located at 213 Chelsea Road, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, and our telephone number is (763) 295-9202.

Annual Meeting and Special Meetings; Bylaw Amendments

This 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is a regular meeting of our shareholders and has been called by our Board of Directors in accordance with our bylaws. Under our bylaws, special meetings of our shareholders may be held at any time and for any purpose and may be called by our secretary, by a majority of the Board or by shareholders as provided by law. Minnesota law permits a shareholder or shareholders holding 10% or more of the voting power of all shares entitled to vote on the matters to be presented to the meeting to call a special meeting, except that a special meeting for the purpose of considering any action to directly or indirectly facilitate or affect a business combination, including any action to change or otherwise affect the composition of the Board of Directors for that purpose, must be called by 25% or more of the voting power of all shares entitled to vote. The business transacted at a special meeting is limited to the purposes as stated in the notice of the meeting. For business to be properly brought before a regular meeting of shareholders, a written notice containing the required information must be timely submitted. For more information, please review our bylaws and the section of this proxy statement entitled “Shareholder Proposals and Shareholder Nominees for 2013 Annual Meeting.”

Our bylaws may be amended or altered by a vote of the majority of the whole Board at any meeting. The authority of the Board is subject to the power of our shareholders, exercisable in the manner provided by Minnesota law, to adopt, amend, or repeal bylaws adopted, amended, or repealed by the Board. Additionally, the Board may not make or alter any bylaws fixing a quorum for meetings of shareholders, prescribing procedures for removing directors or filling vacancies in the Board of Directors, or fixing the number of directors or their classifications, qualifications, or terms of office, except that the Board may adopt or amend any bylaw to increase their number.

OWNERSHIP OF VOTING SECURITIES BY PRINCIPAL HOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table includes information as of November 6, 2012, concerning the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (i) shareholders known to us to hold more than five percent of our common stock, (ii) each of our directors and director nominees, (iii) each Named Executive Officer and (iv) all of our current executive officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, all beneficial owners have sole voting and investment power over the shares held. The business address of each person is 213 Chelsea Road, Monticello, Minnesota 55362.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount (1)	Percent Of Class (2)
Thomas C. Bender (3)(4)	10,000	*

James D. Hartman (3)( 4)	5,000	*

Burton F. Myers II (3)(4)	10,000	*

Michael J. Pudil (3)(4)(5)	89,927	3.1%

Benjamin T. Rashleger (3)(4)(5)	49,568	1.7%

Paul D. Sheely (5)	51,914	1.8%

All Current Officers and Directors as a Group (6 persons)	216,409	7.2%

* Less than one percent.

(1)

Includes the following number of shares that may be purchased within sixty days of November 6, 2012 pursuant to outstanding stock options: Mr. Bender, 10,000 shares; Mr. Hartman, 4,000 shares; Mr. Myers, 10,000 shares; Mr. Pudil, 28,000 shares; Mr. Rashleger, 28,334 shares; Mr. Sheely, 37,500 shares; and all current officers and directors as a group, 117,834 shares.

(2)	Shares of common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding the options for computing such person’s percentage, but are not treated as outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person.

(3)	Serves as a director of WSI Industries.

(4)	Nominee for election to the Board of Directors.

(5)	Named Executive Officer.

PROPOSAL 1:

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Five directors will be elected at the 2013 Annual Meeting to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their respective successors are elected. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named. The Governance/Nominating Committee has nominated, and the Board of Directors has ratified the nomination of, the five persons named below. All nominees are currently directors of WSI Industries.

It is intended that proxies will be voted for the nominees named below, and the Board of Directors has no reason to believe any nominee will not be able to serve as a director if elected. In the event that any nominee named below is unable to serve as a director, the persons named in the proxies have advised that they will vote for the election of such substitute or additional nominees as the Board of Directors may propose.

Information Regarding Nominees

Set forth below are the biographies of the nominees, as well as a discussion of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led to the conclusion that the nominee should serve as a director of WSI Industries at this time. All nominees meet the criteria applicable to Board nominees that are set out in our Governance Guidelines and summarized under “Corporate Governance – Director Nominees – Criteria for Nomination to the Board; Diversity Considerations.”

Thomas C. Bender, age 66, has served as our director since 2008. From 1997 to 2008, Mr. Bender was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Cretex Companies, Inc., a diversified manufacturing holding company. He retired from Cretex Companies in 2008. From 1984 to 1997, Mr. Bender was employed in roles of increasing responsibility within Cretex Companies, Inc.

Mr. Bender brings to the Board a strong background in executive management through his service for more than a decade as the Chief Executive Officer of a manufacturing holding company. This executive management expertise qualifies Mr. Bender to serve as a director of WSI Industries.

James D. Hartman, age 66, has served as our director since October 19, 2010. From 2003 until it was acquired in 2007, Mr. Hartman was the Chairman of Enpath Medical, Inc., a publicly traded medical device company. From 1991 until 2007, Mr. Hartman held a variety of executive leadership positions with Enpath Medical, Inc. and its predecessor company, including serving as Chief Executive Officer of Enpath from February 1996 to his retirement from that position in January 2006. Mr. Hartman has served as a director of NVE Corporation (Nasdaq: NVEC) since August 2006.

Mr. Hartman’s nearly twenty years experience as a director and executive officer of a publicly traded company qualify him to serve as a director for WSI Industries. In addition, Mr. Hartman qualifies as an audit committee financial expert.

Burton F. Myers II, age 58, has served as our director since 2008. Mr. Myers is President of Franklin Partners, Inc., a company providing advisory services in connection with acquisition and divestiture transactions, which he founded in 1993. From 1984 to 1993, he was a principal and President of Franklin Investments, Inc., which acquired privately-held companies.

Mr. Myers is qualified to serve as a director of WSI Industries because of his extensive experience in merger and acquisition transactions and corporate development, as well as executive leadership for both public and private companies.

Michael J. Pudil, age 64, has served as our director since 1993 and is the Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Pudil also served as our Chief Executive Officer from 1993 until December 31, 2011 and from 1993 to October 2009, also held the title of President. Prior to joining WSI Industries, Mr. Pudil was Vice President and General Manager of Remmele Engineering, Inc., a privately-held contract machining company located in St. Paul, Minnesota.

Mr. Pudil is qualified to serve on the WSI Industries Board of Directors because he brings to the Board a keen understanding of our business and industry developed through his tenure as our Chief Executive Officer and in his previous position in management of another contract machining company.

Benjamin T. Rashleger, age 37, was elected as a director on October 20, 2011. Effective January 1, 2012, Mr. Rashleger was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer. Prior to being appointed as our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Rashleger served as our President and Chief Operating Officer beginning October 12, 2009. Prior to joining WSI, Mr. Rashleger was the President and Chief Financial Officer of Milltronics Manufacturing Company, a privately held machine tool manufacturer in Waconia, Minnesota from 2006 until June 2007. As President and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Rashleger was responsible for all aspects of operations and finance matters for Milltronics. From 2002 to 2006, Mr. Rashleger served Milltronics Manufacturing as Vice President, where he was responsible for all financial, procurement, information systems and customer service related activities. In June 2007, Milltronics Manufacturing Company was acquired by Liberty Diversified Industries and Mr. Rashleger continued on as the Director of Operations of Milltronics Manufacturing as a Liberty Diversified Industries company from June 2007 until December 2008. As the Director of Operations, Mr. Rashleger continued to be responsible for the operations of the Milltronics Manufacturing business of Liberty Diversities Industries. From January 2009 until his appointment as our President and Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Rashleger was on sabbatical and exploring opportunities. Mr. Rashleger earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Business from the Carlson School of Management at the University of Minnesota.

Mr. Rashleger is qualified to serve on the WSI Industries Board because of his deep understanding of our industry and operations, as well as the channel of communication he will provide to the Board as a member of management.

Vote Required

Under Minnesota law and our bylaws, directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting by holders of common stock voting for the election of directors. This means that since shareholders will be electing five directors, the five nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected.

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR

Each of the Nominees for Director.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board and Nominee Independence

The Board of Directors undertook a review of director independence in October 2012 as to all of the five directors then serving. As part of that process, the Board reviewed all transactions and relationships between each director (or any member of his or her immediate family) and WSI Industries, our executive officers and our auditors, and other matters bearing on the independence of directors. As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that all of the directors, except Mr. Pudil and Mr. Rashleger, are independent as defined by the Nasdaq Listing Rules. Mr. Pudil and Mr. Rashleger are not independent under the Nasdaq Listing Rules because each is or has been employed by WSI Industries and each serves or has served as an executive officer.

Committees of the Board of Directors and Committee Independence

The Board of Directors has established a Governance/Nominating Committee, a Compensation Committee and an Audit Committee. The composition and function of these committees are set forth below.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the compensation and other terms of employment of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers and senior management of WSI Industries. Among its other duties, the Compensation Committee oversees our stock-based compensation plans for executive officers, recommends Board compensation, and reviews and makes recommendations on succession plans for the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation and evaluates the Chief Executive Officer’s performance. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Thomas C. Bender (chair), James D. Hartman and Burton F. Myers II. During fiscal year 2012, the Compensation Committee met two times.

The charter of the Compensation Committee requires that the Committee consist of no fewer than two members, each of whom must be “independent” according to the Nasdaq Listing Rules and a non-employee director under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”). Each member of our Compensation Committee meets these requirements. The charter of the Compensation Committee is available by following the link to the “Investor Relations” section of our website at www.wsiindustries.com.

Governance/Nominating Committee. The Governance/Nominating Committee is charged with the responsibility of identifying, evaluating and approving qualified candidates to serve as directors, ensuring that our Board and governance policies are appropriately structured, reviewing and recommending changes to our governance guidelines, and overseeing Board and Committee evaluations. The current members of the Governance/Nominating Committee are Messrs. Burton F. Myers II (lead director), Thomas C. Bender and James D. Hartman. During fiscal year 2012, the Governance/Nominating Committee met one time.

The charter of the Governance/Nominating Committee requires that this committee consist of no fewer than two Board members who satisfy the “independence” requirements of the Nasdaq Listing Rules. Each member of the Governance/Nominating Committee meets these requirements. The charter of the Governance/Nominating Committee is available by following the link to the “Investor Relations” section of our website at www.wsiindustries.com.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee assists the Board by reviewing the integrity of our financial reporting processes and controls; the qualifications, independence and performance of the independent auditors; and compliance by us with certain legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee has the sole authority to retain, compensate, oversee and terminate the independent auditors. The Audit Committee reviews our annual audited financial statements, quarterly financial statements and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee reviews reports on various matters, including our critical accounting policies, significant changes in our selection or application of accounting principles and our internal control processes. The Audit Committee also pre-approves all audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditor.

The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors, a copy of which is available by following the link to the “Investor Relations” section of our website at www.wsiindustries.com. The Audit Committee presently consists of Messrs. James D. Hartman (chair), Thomas C. Bender and Burton F. Myers II. During fiscal year 2012, the Audit Committee met four times.

The charter of the Audit Committee requires that all members of the Audit Committee must be “independent” directors under the Nasdaq Listing Rules and meet the independence requirements of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The members of the Audit Committee must also meet the experience and sophistication requirements of the Nasdaq Listing Rules. The composition of the Audit Committee meets these requirements. The Board of Directors has reviewed the education, experience and other qualifications of each of the members of its Audit Committee. After such review, upon the recommendation of the Governance/Nominating Committee, the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Hartman meets the Securities and Exchange Commission definition of an “audit committee financial expert.”

Board Leadership Structure

Until December 31, 2011, Mr. Pudil served as our Chief Executive Officer and as the chairman of the Board. Effective January 1, 2012, Mr. Pudil retired as our Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Rashleger, our President and Chief Operating Officer and also a director, was promoted to Chief Executive Officer. Following his retirement as our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Pudil has remained chairman of the Board. Effective January 5, 2011, the Board of Directors appointed Burton F. Myers II to serve as lead director, with responsibility for, among other things, presiding at executive sessions of the Board.

The Board of Directors does not have a policy as to whether the chairman should be an independent director, an affiliated director, or a member of management. We also have three standing committees that are each led by a chair. All members of each committee are “independent directors” under the Nasdaq Listing Rules and meet the other similar independence requirements applicable to that committee. No executive officer serves on any committee.

Our Board believes its current leadership structure is appropriate because it effectively allocates responsibility, authority and oversight between management and our Board and the committees of our Board. It does this by giving primary responsibility for the operational leadership to our Chief Executive Officer and giving primary responsibility for strategic direction to our Board, where the Chief Executive Officer is able to provide critical and meaningful insight into the interaction between strategic direction and the operational level execution of our strategies because he is also a board member. The lead director serves as an independent leader among all Board members and provides leadership to the independent directors.

The Governance/Nominating Committee also believes that the existing committee structure facilitates oversight of management by promoting communication by management relating to key audit, compensation and governance matters, and independent consideration of these matters by committees that are comprised exclusively of independent directors.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

In our business, we face a number of risks. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks we face, while the Board has responsibility for the oversight of risk management.

The Board of Directors exercises direct oversight of strategic risks to our company, as well as certain business and operational risks. Our Audit Committee exercises oversight, on behalf of the Board of Directors, relating to accounting, financial controls, financial reporting and related risks. The Compensation Committee supports the Board’s role in risk oversight by overseeing risks relating to compensation programs and policies. In each case, management periodically reports to our Board or relevant committee regarding risks and management’s process to assess and mitigate those risks. Each committee charged with areas of risk oversight also reports to our Board on those matters. Because of the relatively small size of our Board and the fact that directors typically serve on more than one committee, from time to time the Board also exercises direct risk oversight relating to the areas within the risk oversight authority of the committees.

Director Nominations

The Governance/Nominating Committee will consider candidates for Board membership suggested by its members, other Board members, as well as management and shareholders. Shareholders who wish to recommend a prospective nominee should follow the procedures set forth in Article II, Section 5 of our Amended and Restated Bylaws as described in the section of this proxy statement entitled “Shareholder Proposals for Nominees.”

Criteria for Nomination to the Board; Diversity Considerations. The Governance/Nominating Committee is responsible for identifying, evaluating and approving qualified candidates for nomination as directors. The Governance/Nominating Committee has not adopted minimum qualifications that nominees must meet in order for the committee to recommend them to the Board of Directors, as the Governance/Nominating Committee believes that each nominee should be evaluated based on his or her merits as an individual, taking into account the needs of WSI Industries and the Board of Directors.

The Governance/Nominating Committee evaluates each prospective nominee against the following standards and qualifications:

Background, including high personal and professional ethics and integrity; and the ability to exercise good business judgment and enhance the Board’s ability to manage and direct our affairs and business;

Commitment, including the willingness to devote adequate time to the work of the Board and its committees, and the ability to represent the interests of all shareholders and not a particular interest group;

Board skills needs, in the context of the existing makeup of the Board, and the candidate’s qualification as independent and qualification to serve on Board committees;

Business experience, which should reflect a broad experience at the policy-making level in business, government and/or education; and

Diversity, in terms of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, and other demographics which contribute to the Board’s diversity.

The Committee also considers such other relevant factors as it deems appropriate. The Governance/Nominating Committee will consider persons recommended by the shareholders in the same manner as other nominees.

The Governance/Nominating Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity. However, as part of the nominee selection process for this Annual Meeting, the Governance/Nominating Committee reviewed the knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, and other characteristics of each director nominee. Based upon that review, the Governance/Nominating Committee believes that each director contributes to the Board’s diversity in terms of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, and other demographics that particular director brings to the Board.

Process for Identifying and Evaluating Nominees. The process for identifying and evaluating nominees to the Board of Directors is initiated by identifying a slate of candidates who meet the criteria for selection as a nominee and have the specific qualities or skills being sought based on input from members of the Board and, if the Governance/Nominating Committee deems appropriate, a third-party search firm. The Governance/Nominating Committee evaluates these candidates by reviewing the candidates’ biographical information and qualifications and checking the candidates’ references. One or more Governance/Nominating Committee members will interview the prospective nominees in person or by telephone. After completing the evaluation, the Governance/Nominating Committee makes a recommendation to the full Board of the nominees to be presented for the approval of the shareholders or for election to fill a vacancy.

Board Nominees for the 2013 Annual Meeting. The Governance/Nominating Committee selected the nominees for this 2013 Annual Meeting in October 2012. All of the nominees for election at this 2013 Annual Meeting served as directors during fiscal year 2012 and were elected by shareholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting. We have not engaged a third-party search firm to assist us in identifying potential director candidates, but the Governance/Nominating Committee may choose to do so in the future.

Shareholder Proposals for Nominees. The Governance/Nominating Committee will consider written proposals from shareholders for nominees for director. Any such nominations should be submitted to the Governance/Nominating Committee c/o the Secretary of WSI Industries and should include the following information: (a) all information relating to such nominee that is required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the 1934 Act (including such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected); (b) the name and record address of the shareholder and of the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination will be made, and (c) the class and number of shares of the corporation owned by the shareholder and beneficially owned by the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination will be made. As to each person the shareholder proposes to nominate, the written notice must also state: (a) the name, age, business address and residence address of the person, (b) the principal occupation or employment of the person and (c) the class and number of shares of the corporation’s capital stock beneficially owned by the person. To be considered, the written notice must be submitted in the time frames described in our Amended and Restated Bylaws and under the caption “Shareholder Proposals and Shareholder Nominees for 2014 Annual Meeting” below.

Board Attendance at Meetings

The Board of Directors met four times during fiscal year 2012. Each nominee who served as a director in fiscal year 2012 attended at least 75% or more of the meetings of the Board of Directors and any committee on which he served.

We do not have a formal policy on attendance at meetings of our shareholders. However, we encourage all Board members to attend shareholder meetings that are held in conjunction with a meeting of the Board of Directors. All members of the Board of Directors then serving attended the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Communications with Directors

Shareholders may communicate with the Board as a group, the chair of any committee of the Board of Directors or any individual director by sending an e-mail to lead.director@wsci.com or by directing the communication in care of lead director, at the address set forth on the front page of this proxy statement.

Code of Ethics

On October 29, 2003, we adopted a Code of Ethics & Business Conduct that applies to all directors and employees, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics & Business Conduct is an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 28, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available at www.sec.gov.

REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is currently comprised of Messrs. Hartman, Bender and Myers. In accordance with its Charter, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and Schechter Dokken Kanter Andrews & Selcer Ltd., our independent accountants. The discussions with Schechter Dokken Kanter Andrews & Selcer Ltd. also included the matters required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence.

Schechter Dokken Kanter Andrews & Selcer Ltd provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter regarding its independence as required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. This information was discussed with Schechter Dokken Kanter Andrews & Selcer Ltd.

Based on the discussions with management and Schechter Dokken Kanter Andrews & Selcer Ltd., the Audit Committee’s review of the representations of management and the report of Schechter Dokken Kanter Andrews & Selcer Ltd., the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 26, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

SUBMITTED BY THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS:

James D. Hartman	Thomas C. Bender	Burton F. Myers II
(Chair)

The preceding report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”), except to the extent we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under the 1933 Act or the 1934 Act.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Set forth below is biographical and other information on our current executive officers. Information about Michael J. Pudil, who served as our Chief Executive Officer until December 31, 2011, and Benjamin T. Rashleger, who began serving as our Chief Executive Officer January 1, 2012 and prior to that time, served as our President and Chief Operating Officer, may be found under the heading “Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors” at Proposal 1: Election of Directors.

Paul D. Sheely, age 53, has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance, as well as our Treasurer and Secretary, since September 1998. From 1996 to 1998 he served as Chief Financial Officer of Graseby Medical, Inc., a medical device manufacturer of volumetric infusion pumps.

DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Explanation of Compensation

The following discussion and analysis describes our compensation objectives and policies as applied to the persons serving as our executive officers during our fiscal year 2012.

During fiscal year 2012, Michael J. Pudil served as our Chief Executive Officer until December 31, 2011 when he retired. Effective January 1, 2012, Benjamin T. Rashleger began serving as our Chief Executive Officer. Prior to January 1, 2012, Mr. Rashleger served as our President and Chief Operating Officer. During fiscal year 2012, Paul D. Sheely served as our Chief Financial Officer. Messrs. Pudil, Rashleger, and Sheely are referred to in this proxy statement as the Named Executive Officers.

This explanation section is intended to provide a framework for understanding the actual compensation awarded to or earned by each Named Executive Officer during fiscal year 2012, as reported in the compensation tables and accompanying narrative sections of this proxy statement.

For the Named Executive Officers, annual compensation consists of base salary, a cash bonus based on achievement of goals determined by the Compensation Committee, performance based equity compensation, and long-term equity compensation.

Overview of the Compensation Process

The responsibility of the Compensation Committee is to review and approve the compensation and other terms of employment of our Chief Executive Officer and our other executive officers. Among its other duties, the Compensation Committee oversees all significant aspects of our compensation plans and benefit programs, including succession plans for executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer. The Board of Directors is responsible for, and regularly reviews, the succession plan for our Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives for the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation and evaluates the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of those goals and objectives. The Compensation Committee also recommends to the Board the compensation and benefits for directors. The Compensation Committee has also been appointed by the Board of Directors to administer our 2005 Stock Plan (the “2005 Plan”).

In carrying out its duties, the Compensation Committee participates in the design and implementation and ultimately reviews and approves specific compensation programs. On October 20, 2011, the Compensation Committee adopted and the Board of Directors approved the 2012 Executive Bonus Program (the “2012 Executive Bonus Program”) for Messrs. Rashleger and Sheely and other members of management. The Compensation Committee also approved the bonus that may be earned by Messrs. Rashleger and Sheely under the 2012 Executive Bonus Program, as a percentage of the executive officer’s salary, at the threshold, target and maximum levels. On October 20, 2011, the Compensation Committee also approved grants of performance based restricted stock under the 2012 Executive Bonus Program as part of the design of that program. Mr. Pudil did not participate in the 2012 Executive Bonus Program or any other bonus program.

Use of Compensation Consultant and Role of Management

Under the Compensation Committee’s charter, the Compensation Committee has the authority to retain, at our expense, such independent counsel or other advisers as it deems necessary to carry out its responsibilities. The Compensation Committee did not engage a compensation consultant to assist it in determining executive compensation for fiscal year 2012. However, with respect to fiscal year 2012 compensation, the Compensation Committee reviewed director and executive officer compensation information prepared by a compensation consultant for fiscal year 2008, as well as reviewed surveys, reports and other market data against which it measured the competitiveness of our compensation programs for fiscal year 2012.

In determining compensation for Named Executive Officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee solicits input from the Chief Executive Officer regarding the duties, responsibilities and performance of the other executive officer and the results of performance reviews. The Chief Executive Officer also recommends to the Compensation Committee the base salary for all Named Executive Officers, the awards under the cash incentive compensation program, and the awards under the long-term equity program. The Chief Executive Officer also recommended to the Compensation Committee the financial performance goals under the 2012 Executive Bonus Program. From time to time, the Named Executive Officers are invited to attend meetings of the Compensation Committee. No Named Executive Officer attends any executive session of the Compensation Committee or is present during deliberations or determination of such Named Executive Officer’s compensation.

2012 Compensation for Named Executive Officers

Base Salaries

On October 20, 2011, Compensation Committee set the annual base salaries for the Named Executive Officers effective October 24, 2011. Mr. Rashleger’s annual base salary was increased to $216,000, reflecting his responsibilities effective January 1, 2012 as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Sheely’s base salary was increased to $140,910 from $136,806, which the Compensation Committee believes reflects a cost of living adjustment. Mr. Pudil’s annual base salary of $100,000 was set by his employment agreement dated October 7, 2009 and continued until his retirement on December 31, 2011.

In determining base salaries for Messrs. Rashleger and Sheely for fiscal year 2012, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed our historical and projected financial performance, and the impact of economic conditions on our business. The Compensation Committee also reviewed historical salary data for the executive officer positions, the total cash compensation Messrs. Rashleger and Sheely may earn from the executive bonus program, and information regarding salary practices at other companies based on surveys, reports and other market data.

Design of 2012 Executive Bonus Programs

For fiscal year 2012, cash and equity incentive compensation was available to Messrs. Rashleger and Sheely through the 2012 Executive Bonus Program. On October 20, 2011, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board of Directors approved the 2012 Executive Bonus Program. Of the Named Executive Officers, only Messrs. Rashleger and Sheely participated in the 2012 Executive Bonus Program.

Under the 2012 Executive Bonus Program, Messrs. Rashleger and Sheely were eligible for a cash bonus depending upon our fiscal year 2012 performance against goals established by the Compensation Committee relating to return on assets. Return on assets (“ROA”) is defined as pretax income before incentive compensation divided by average tangible assets. The Compensation Committee set threshold, target and maximum goals for fiscal year 2012 relating to ROA. If the threshold level was not met, the executive officers would not earn any bonus under the 2012 Executive Bonus Program.

Under the Program, Mr. Rashleger was eligible for a bonus of 10%, 60% and 80% of his base salary at the threshold, target and maximum levels of return on assets, respectively. Mr. Sheely was eligible for a bonus of 10%, 50% and 70% of his base salary at the threshold, target and maximum levels of return on assets, respectively. If we achieved a level of ROA that fell between the levels established by the Compensation Committee, the executive officer’s bonus would be prorated.

All bonuses at the threshold and target levels and between the threshold and target levels will be paid out in cash. If we achieved ROA in excess of the target level and up to the maximum level, the executive officer’s bonus will be paid out in cash up to the target level amount and for the bonus in excess of the target level amount, the bonus will be paid by lapse of restrictions on shares of performance based restricted stock granted by the Compensation Committee effective October 24, 2011.

Grants of performance based restricted stock under the 2012 Executive Bonus Program represented the maximum number of shares that could be earned under the 2012 Executive Bonus Program. The number of shares of performance based restricted stock granted effective October 24, 2011 to Messrs. Rashleger and Sheely was 7,448 and 4,858 shares, respectively. The shares of performance based restricted stock may not be transferred unless and until the restrictions lapse upon achievement of ROA in excess of the target level and up to the maximum level. The holder of the performance based restricted stock is entitled to vote and receive dividends and exercise all other rights with respect to the shares. The number of shares as to which restrictions would lapse would be based on the cash equivalent of bonus earned by the executive officer divided by the per share price of our common stock on the date of grant of the performance based restricted stock, which was $5.80 per share. Any shares of performance based restricted stock as to which restrictions do not lapse will be forfeited.

The Compensation Committee maintained the same structure for the cash bonus program in fiscal year 2012 as it did in fiscal year 2011 with the bonus amounts based on ROA for the fiscal year. For fiscal year 2012, the minimum ROA goal was 8%, the target ROA goal was 15%, and the maximum ROA goal was 22%. The Compensation Committee intended these goals to be challenging, but reasonable under the circumstances and reflective of the budget developed for fiscal year 2012.

On October 17, 2012, the Compensation Committee determined the achievement and payout to executive officers under the 2012 Executive Bonus Program. Our ROA for fiscal year 2012 was 15.37%, which slightly exceeded the target amount. Accordingly, under the 2012 Executive Bonus Program, we paid Mr. Rashleger and Mr. Sheely a cash bonus of $125,862 and $70,100, respectively, or approximately 60% and 50% of the respective annual base salaries earned during fiscal 2012. Because ROA exceeded the target level amount, but was less than the maximum amount, each officer forfeited a pro-rated number of shares of performance based restricted stock granted in connection with the 2012 Program, effective as of October 17, 2012. Accordingly, Messrs. Rashleger and Sheely forfeited 7,266 and 4,743 shares of performance based restricted stock, respectively, and retained 402 and 261 shares, respectively, all of which represents shares of performance based restricted stock originally granted on October 24, 2011 plus dividends paid in additional shares.

Long-Term Equity Compensation

The Compensation Committee provides long-term equity compensation to the Named Executive Officers through annual, discretionary grants under our 2005 Stock Plan, as amended (the “2005 Plan”).

On January 9, 2012, the Board of Directors approved recommendations of the Compensation Committee with respect to the grant of non-qualified stock options with tandem stock appreciation rights and restricted stock awards to the Named Executive Officers. Mr. Rashleger was granted 7,500 shares of restricted stock and an option with stock appreciation rights to purchase 15,000 shares of stock. Mr. Sheely was granted 2,000 shares of restricted stock and an option with stock appreciation rights to purchase 5,000 shares of stock. The awards made in January 2012 were made under the 2005 Plan. Long-term equity awards are typically granted in January of each year.

The shares of restricted stock are restricted for a period of three years and during such restriction period, the shares of restricted stock may not be sold, assigned, transferred, exchanged, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise encumbered or disposed of and also are subject to the risk of forfeiture. The restrictions and risk of forfeiture will lapse as to one-third of the restricted shares on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant. Cash dividends paid prior to a lapse of restrictions on the restricted stock will be reinvested in additional shares of restricted stock. All restrictions on such reinvested shares of restricted stock will lapse on the next date that the corresponding one-third of the restricted shares restrictions lapse.

The stock options have an exercise price of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, vest on the 6 month, 18 month, and 30 month anniversaries of the date of grant, have a term of ten years and in other respects are subject to the terms and conditions of the 2005 Plan. The stock appreciation rights were granted for an identical number of shares in tandem with the options such that the stock appreciation rights will expire on exercise of the option and vice versa. The stock appreciation rights, if exercised, will be settled in shares of our common stock.

In determining the number of shares of restricted stock and shares underlying stock options, the Compensation Committee considered the overall value of the awards, as well as the allocation of the value between the two types of awards.

The Compensation Committee has historically granted stock options to executive officers and, since fiscal year 2007, has also granted restricted stock to executive officers based upon the Compensation Committee belief that awards of restricted stock result in less dilution to existing shareholders. For the same reason, the Compensation Committee has granted stock appreciation rights with options since February 2007.

Employment Agreements and Post-Termination Compensation

As of the end of fiscal year 2012, we were parties to the following agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers relating to his employment and post-termination compensation.

Agreements with Mr. Pudil

On October 7, 2009, in connection with the hiring of Mr. Rashleger, we entered into an employment agreement with Michael J. Pudil. The employment agreement has a term beginning on October 7, 2009 and ending December 31, 2011. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Pudil was employed as our Chief Executive Officer until December 31, 2011, at which time Mr. Pudil retired. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Pudil’s base salary was reduced to $100,000 beginning January 1, 2010. Mr. Pudil was entitled to insurance, vacation, and other benefits we make available. Because Mr. Pudil continued to be employed by us until the agreement terminated on December 31, 2011, we paid Mr. Pudil for all obligations accrued through such date of termination and also made a lump sum severance payment to Mr. Pudil equal to $335,000 on a date that was six months and one day after the effective date of termination of employment. Additionally, we will continue to be responsible for the employer portion of monthly premiums for Mr. Pudil’s group health, dental, life insurance and special medical insurance for an eighteen month period following the termination. Following this eighteen month period, we will make a lump sum payment to Mr. Pudil equal to the employer portion of monthly premiums multiplied by the number of months until Mr. Pudil reaches age 65 or is eligible for Medicare. Further, all outstanding stock options held by Mr. Pudil fully vested and he has the right to exercise all such vested stock options for an eighteen month period following the termination, except that no stock option will be exercisable after its original expiration date. All restrictions on outstanding restricted stock awards held by Mr. Pudil also lapsed on the last day of employment. Capitalized terms used in this paragraph have the meaning ascribed to them in the employment agreement with Mr. Pudil.

On October 7, 2009, Mr. Pudil also entered into the form of restrictive covenant agreement governing non-disclosure of confidential information, non-competition and non-solicitation.

Agreements with Mr. Rashleger

When Benjamin T. Rashleger was appointed as our President and Chief Operating Officer on October 12, 2009, we and Mr. Rashleger entered into an employment offer letter, an employment (change in control) agreement and a standard form of restrictive covenant agreement governing non-disclosure of confidential information, non-competition and non-solicitation. On October 20, 2011, the Compensation Committee recommended and the Board of Directors approved a severance letter agreement between us and Mr. Rashleger in connection with his promotion to our Chief Executive Officer.

The material terms of the offer letter, employment (change in control) agreement and severance letter agreement are explained below.

Under the terms of the offer letter, Mr. Rashleger’s starting base salary was $150,000, payable according to our regular payroll practices. Mr. Rashleger will also participate in our incentive program for executive officers and will be entitled to bonus of 70% of his base salary based upon achievement of goals relating to new business and profitability for the fiscal year to be jointly determined and subject to approval by the Board. Also pursuant to the offer letter, Mr. Rashleger was granted a non-qualified stock option on October 12, 2009 to purchase 10,000 shares of our common stock under the 2005 Plan. The option has an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock as of the grant date, as determined under the plan. The option vests with respect to one-third of the shares underlying the option on each of the 6 month, 18 month and 30 month anniversaries of the date of grant and has a term of ten years.

The employment (change in control) agreement with Mr. Rashleger automatically renews for successive one-year periods unless we provide at least 60 days’ prior notice. However, if a Change of Control occurs, the employment (change in control) agreement will remain in effect for a period of twelve months from the date of the Change of Control. Under these agreements, if a Change in Control occurs and Mr. Rashleger’s employment is terminated by us other than for Cause or Disability or by him for Good Reason, we will pay Mr. Rashleger a severance payment in cash in a single sum within sixty days of the date of termination equal to 2.99 times the average of the annual compensation paid to him by us for the five calendar years (or such lesser number of complete calendar years or portions thereof calculated on an annualized basis) in the case of an Unapproved Change in Control and, in the case of an Approved Change in Control, 1.0 times the annual compensation for such period. Mr. Rashleger will also be entitled to participate in life, disability, accident and health insurance benefits for a period of twelve months following the Termination Date in the event of an Approved Change of Control and for thirty-six months following the Termination Date in the event of an Unapproved Change in Control, or we will reimburse Mr. Rashleger for the cost of comparable coverage. The severance payment is subject to reduction such that no portion of the payment, together with other benefits received in a change of control, would constitute a “parachute payment” or would be non-deductible solely by reason of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Capitalized terms used in this paragraph have the meaning ascribed to them in the employment (change in control) agreement.

Under the severance letter agreement, if Mr. Rashleger’s employment is terminated without Cause, we will continue to pay Mr. Rashleger his base salary in accordance with our regular payroll practices for a period of eighteen months or until he has secured other employment, whichever occurs first, and we will pay a portion of the COBRA premium until the earlier of eighteen months or the date COBRA coverage otherwise terminates. If Mr. Rashleger’s employment terminates because of his resignation, if we terminate his employment for Cause or if Mr. Rashleger’s employment terminates as a result of his death or disability, our only obligation to Mr. Rashleger is to pay any base salary earned but not yet paid. Payments under the severance letter agreement that constitute nonqualified deferred compensation may be delayed, provided that the amount of the first payment shall be increased for interest earned on the delayed payment based upon interest. Capitalized terms used in this paragraph have the meaning ascribed to them in the severance letter agreement.

Except with respect to the employment (change in control) agreement and the severance letter agreement with Mr. Rashleger, Mr. Rashleger’s employment with us is “at will.”

Agreements with Mr. Sheely

On October 7, 2009, we entered into a severance letter agreement with Paul D. Sheely. Under the severance letter agreement, if Mr. Sheely’s employment is terminated without Cause, we will continue to pay Mr. Sheely his base salary in accordance with our regular payroll practices for a period of twelve months or until he has secured other employment, whichever occurs first, and we will pay a portion of the COBRA premium until the earlier of twelve months or the date COBRA coverage otherwise terminates. If Mr. Sheely’s employment terminates because of his resignation, if we terminate his employment for Cause or if Mr. Sheely’s employment terminates as a result of his death or disability, our only obligation to Mr. Sheely is to pay any base salary earned but not yet paid. Payments under the severance letter agreement that constitute nonqualified deferred compensation may be delayed, provided that the amount of the first payment shall be increased for interest earned on the delayed payment based upon interest. Capitalized terms used in this paragraph have the meaning ascribed to them in the severance letter agreement. On October 7, 2009, Mr. Sheely also entered into the form of restrictive covenant agreement governing non-disclosure of confidential information, non-competition and non-solicitation.

We also have entered into a employment (change of control) agreement with Mr. Sheely that is dated January 11, 2001 and that was amended on November 1, 2002 and on December 29, 2008. This employment (change of control) agreement with Mr. Sheely is the same as the employment (change of control) agreement between us and Mr. Rashleger explained above. Except with respect to this agreement and the severance agreement described above, Mr. Sheely’s employment with us is “at will.”

Payments Upon a Change of Control

In general, a “Change of Control” would include a change resulting from the acquisition of 50% or more of our outstanding voting stock by any person, a change in the current members of the Board of Directors or their successors elected or nominated by such members whereby they cease to be a majority of the Board of Directors, or WSI Industries disposing of 75% or more of our assets, other than to an entity owned 50% or greater by WSI Industries or any of our subsidiaries.

If a change of control which was not approved by the Board of Directors had occurred at the end of fiscal year 2012 and the executives’ employment was terminated without cause or by the executive for good reason, the executive officers would have received the approximate payment indicated pursuant to the employment agreements: Mr. Rashleger, $808,151 and Mr. Sheely, $578,469. If a change in control occurred at the end of fiscal year 2012, Mr. Pudil would not have received any payment under his employment agreement as he retired on December 31, 2011 and was not employed by us at the end of fiscal year 2012.

The calculation above also does not reflect the value of acceleration of vesting of stock options, lapse of restrictions on restricted stock, or lapse of restrictions on performance based restricted stock that would be received by a Named Executive Officer if a change of control had occurred at the end of fiscal year 2012. Under the 2005 Plan, unless the stock option agreement provides otherwise, any stock option granted under the 2005 Plan will be exercisable in full, without regard to any installment exercise provisions, for a period specified us, but not to exceed 60 days, prior to the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) dissolution or liquidation of WSI Industries, other than in conjunction with a bankruptcy or any similar occurrence; (ii) any merger, consolidation, acquisition, separation, reorganization or similar occurrence where we will not be the surviving entity; or (iii) the transfer of substantially all of our assets, or 75% or more of the outstanding our stock. Additionally, the form of agreement evidencing the restricted stock and performance based restricted stock granted under the 2005 Plan provides that all restrictions with respect to any restricted shares will lapse on the date determined by the Compensation Committee prior to, but in no event more 60 days prior to, the occurrence of any of these same events.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table shows information concerning compensation earned for services in all capacities during the fiscal year for (i) Michael J. Pudil, who served as our Chief Executive Officer during the portion of fiscal year 2012 from August 29, 2011 until his retirement on December 31, 2011; (ii) Benjamin T. Rashleger who served as our Chief Executive Officer for the portion of fiscal year 2012 beginning January 1, 2012 and as our President and Chief Operating Officer prior to that time; and (iii) Paul D. Sheely, who served as our Chief Financial Officer in fiscal year 2012 (together referred to as our “Named Executive Officers”). Other than the Named Executive Officers, no other person served as an executive officer during fiscal year 2012.

Name and Position	Year		Salary ($)		Stock Awards ($)(1)		Option Awards ($)(1)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compen-sation ($)(2)		All Other Compen-sation ($)(3)		Total ($)
Michael J. Pudil Former Chief Executive Officer		2012	$	55,760	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	336,279	$	392,039
Michael J. Pudil Former Chief Executive Officer		2011	$	100,000	$	14,790	$	28,059	$	—	$	3,500	$	146,349
Benjamin T. Rashleger Chief Executive Officer		2012	$	209,769	$	38,025	$	43,339	$	125,862	$	8,430	$	425,425
Benjamin T. Rashleger Chief Executive Officer		2011	$	175,385	$	48,890	$	70,407	$	62,437	$	6,621	$	363,740
Paul D. Sheely Chief Financial Officer		2012	$	140,200	$	10,140	$	14,446	$	70,100	$	6,599	$	241,485
Paul D. Sheely Chief Financial Officer		2011	$	135,804	$	9,860	$	14,029	$	48,346	$	5,238	$	213,277

(1)

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock option awards in the respective fiscal year, each as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation. The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model using the assumptions discussed in Note 5, “Stock Based Compensation,” in the notes to financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 26, 2012 and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 28, 2011. Mr. Pudil received a stock option award in fiscal year 2012 for his service as a director. That award is reported in the table included in the “Director Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement.

(2)

Represents bonuses paid to the Named Executive Officers under the Executive Bonus Program in effect for the fiscal year indicated, which are reported for the year in which the related services were performed.

(3)

For Mr. Pudil, includes $335,000 paid in fiscal year 2012 as severance pursuant to the terms of his October 7, 2009 employment agreement with us. All other amounts represent matching contributions by WSI Industries under our 401(k) Plan.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth certain information concerning equity awards outstanding to the Named Executive Officers at August 26, 2012.

	Option Awards								Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexer-cisable (1)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(1)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(1)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(1)(2)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(1)(2)
Michael J. Pudil		10,000		—	$	3.47	2/22/2017			—		—		—		—
Michael J. Pudil		15,000		—	$	5.39	1/08/2018			—		—		—		—
Michael J. Pudil		15,000		—	$	3.46	1/07/2019			—		—		—		—
Michael J. Pudil		10,000		—	$	4.93	1/09/2021			—		—		—		—
Michael J. Pudil (3)		500		1,500	$	5.07	1/04/2017			—		—		—		—
Benjamin T. Rashleger		10,000		—	$	3.00	10/11/2019			—		—		—		—
Benjamin T. Rashleger		6,667		3,333	$	6.82	10/21/2020			—		—		—		—
Benjamin T. Rashleger		6,667		3,333	$	4.93	1/09/2021			—		—		—		—
Benjamin T. Rashleger		5,000		10,000	$	5.07	1/09/2022			—		—		—		—
Benjamin T. Rashleger		—		—		—		—		854	$	6,149		—		—
Benjamin T. Rashleger		—		—		—		—		3,435	$	24,732		—		—
Benjamin T. Rashleger		—		—		—		—		2,044	$	10,935		—		—
Benjamin T. Rashleger		—		—		—		—		7,668	$	41,024		—		—
Benjamin T. Rashleger		—		—		—		—		—		—		7,668	$	55,210
Paul D. Sheely		5,000		—	$	3.44	1/03/2016			—		—		—		—
Paul D. Sheely		7,500		—	$	3.47	2/22/2017			—		—		—		—
Paul D. Sheely		7,500		—	$	5.39	1/08/2018			—		—		—		—
Paul D. Sheely		7,500		—	$	3.46	1/07/2019			—		—		—		—
Paul D. Sheely		5,000		—	$	2.13	1/05/2020			—		—		—		—
Paul D. Sheely		3,334		1,666	$	4.93	1/09/2021			—		—		—		—
Paul D. Sheely		1,666		3,334	$	5.07	1/09/2022			—		—		—		—
Paul D. Sheely		—		—		—		—		853	$	6,142		—		—
Paul D. Sheely		—		—		—		—		1,363	$	9,814		—		—
Paul D. Sheely		—		—		—		—		2,044	$	14,717		—		—
Paul D. Sheely		—		—		—		—		—		—		5,004	$	36,029

(1)

Includes shares distributed as a dividend with respect to the restricted stock.

(2)

Includes 7,266 shares of performance based restricted stock held by Mr. Rashleger and 4,743 shares of performance based restricted stock held by Mr. Sheely that were outstanding at August 26, 2012 but that were forfeited on October 17, 2012 pursuant to the terms of the agreement covering these awards.

(3)

Stock option granted to Mr. Pudil as a director pursuant to the terms of the 2005 Stock Plan. See “Director Compensation” below for more information on this award.

All options referred to above, with the exception of the option granted to Mr. Pudil as a director pursuant to the terms of the 2005 Stock Plan, vest as to one-third of the shares six months from the date of grant, one-third of the shares eighteen months from date of grant and one-third of the shares thirty months from the date of grant. The expiration date of each option is the ten-year anniversary of the date of grant of such option. On February 23, 2007, the Board of Directors granted stock appreciation rights for an identical number of shares in tandem with all outstanding stock options. The stock appreciation rights will expire on exercise of the stock option and vice versa. The stock appreciation rights, if exercised, will be settled in shares of our common stock.

Grants of performance based restricted stock were made to the Named Executive Officers under the 2012 Executive Bonus Program and represented the maximum number of shares that could be earned under the 2012 Executive Bonus Program. The shares of performance based restricted stock may not be transferred unless and until the restrictions lapse upon achievement of ROA in excess of the target level and up to the maximum level. The holder of the performance based restricted stock is entitled to vote and receive dividends and exercise all other rights with respect to the shares. The number of shares as to which restrictions would lapse would be based on the cash equivalent of bonus earned by the executive officer divided by the per share price of our common stock on the date of grant of the performance based restricted stock, which was $5.80 per share. Any shares of performance based restricted stock as to which restrictions do not lapse will be forfeited.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Directors who are not employees of WSI Industries earned an annual retainer of $10,000 for service in fiscal year 2012. Each non-employee director is paid a fee of $500 for each meeting of the Board of Directors or any committee attended, except for committee meetings that immediately precede or follow a Board meeting. The chairs of the Compensation Committee and Audit Committee receive an additional $1,000 annual retainer. Effective January 5, 2011, the Board of Directors appointed Burton F. Myers II to serve as lead director and in connection with that service, Mr. Myers received an additional $1,000 annual retainer.

Under the 2005 Stock Plan, each non-employee director will receive at the time of election or re-election to the Board by the shareholders an option to purchase 2,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of such election or reelection. The term of each director option will be five years, unless the director ceases serving on the Board, in which event the option expires within 30 days of termination of service. Each director option will be exercisable in installments of 25% beginning six months after the date of grant, and 25% on each of the three subsequent anniversaries of the date of grant.

We established a retirement program in 1982 for directors not covered by any of our other retirement plans that provides for the payment of an annual benefit equal to the annual retainer paid to directors during the full fiscal year preceding retirement. The retirement benefit, which is payable to directors who have served five years or more, commences at the time the director retires if age 65 or older, or at age 65 if the director ceases to serve as a director prior to age 65. The retirement benefit is subject to proportionate reduction if the director has served us less than 15 years. Benefits are payable during the lifetime of the retired director, but not exceeding 10 years. On January 9, 2008, we eliminated the director retirement program for all board members elected on or after January 9, 2008 (other than those serving as a board member prior to January 9, 2008). No director serving in fiscal year 2012 received any benefits from the director retirement program in fiscal year 2012 and three former directors received benefits under this program in fiscal year 2012.

The following table shows for fiscal year 2012, the cash and other compensation paid to each of our Board members. Mr. Pudil received compensation for Board service only after he retired as our Chief Executive Officer on December 31, 2011.

Name of Director	Fees Earned/Paid In Cash ($)(1)	Option Awards ($) (2)	Total Compensation
Michael J. Pudil	$11,500	$5,383	$16,883
Thomas C. Bender	$13,000	$5,383	$18,383
James D. Hartman	$13,000	$5,383	$18,383
Burton F. Myers II	$13,000	$5,383	$18,383

(1)

Represents cash retainer and meeting fees paid in fiscal year 2012 as described above.

(2)

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock option awards in fiscal year 2012, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation. The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model using the assumptions discussed in Note 5, “Stock Based Compensation,” in the notes to financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 26, 2012.

The aggregate number of stock options outstanding at August 26, 2012 held by directors then serving was: Mr. Pudil, 52,000 shares; Mr. Bender, 12,000 shares; Mr. Hartman, 6,000 shares; and Mr. Myers, 12,000 shares.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

Since the beginning of fiscal year 2012, we have not entered into any transaction and there are no currently proposed transactions, in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year-end for the last three completed fiscal years and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

PROPOSAL 2:

APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Audit Committee has reappointed Schechter Dokken Kanter Andrews & Selcer Ltd. (“SDK”) as our independent registered public accountants for fiscal year ended August 25, 2013. While the Audit Committee retains the sole authority to retain, compensate, oversee and terminate the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee is submitting the reappointment of SDK as our independent registered public accountants for ratification. In the event the shareholders do not ratify the reappointment of SDK, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection.

Approval of Proposal 2: Ratification of the appointment of SDK requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a greater of: (a) a majority of the voting power of the shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on Proposal 2 or (b) a majority of the voting power of the minimum number of shares that would constitute a quorum.

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR

Ratification of the Appointment of Schechter Dokken Kanter Andrews & Selcer Ltd.

RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Schechter Dokken Kanter Andrews & Selcer Ltd., independent registered public accountants, served as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2012. Our Audit Committee has selected SDK to serve as our auditors for the fiscal year ended August 25, 2013 and is asking our shareholders to ratify such appointment at this Annual Meeting.

Representatives of SDK are expected to be in attendance at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. In addition, representatives will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Accountant Fees and Services

The following is an explanation of the fees billed to us by SDK for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended August 26, 2012 and August 28, 2011, which totaled $72,400 and $67,475, respectively.

Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed to us for professional services related to the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our Forms 10-QSB, or other services normally provided by SDK in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the fiscal years ended August 26, 2012 and August 28, 2011 totaled $65,000 and $59,925, respectively.

Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed to us by SDK for professional services related to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning, including federal, state and local income tax matters, for the fiscal years ended August 26, 2012 and August 28, 2011 totaled $7,400 and $7,550, respectively.

All Other Fees. Other than those described above, there were no fees billed to us by SDK for professional services for fiscal years ended August 26, 2012 or August 28, 2011.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Procedures

We have adopted pre-approval policies and procedures for the Audit Committee that require the Audit Committee to pre-approve all audit and all permitted non-audit engagements and services (including the fees and terms thereof) by the independent auditors, except that the Audit Committee may delegate the authority to pre-approve any engagement or service less than $5,000 to one of its members, but requires that the member report such pre-approval at the next full Audit Committee meeting. The Audit Committee may not delegate its pre-approval authority for any services rendered by our independent auditors relating to internal controls. These pre-approval policies and procedures prohibit delegation of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities to our management. Under the policies and procedures, the Audit Committee may pre-approve specifically described categories of services which are expected to be conducted over the subsequent twelve months on its own volition, or upon application by management or the independent auditor.

All of the services described above for fiscal year 2012 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee or a member of the committee before SDK was engaged to render the services.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the 1934 Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. These insiders are required by Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file, including Forms 3, 4 and 5.

To our knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended August 26, 2012 all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its insiders were complied with.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND SHAREHOLDER NOMINEES

FOR 2014 ANNUAL MEETING

The proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission permit shareholders of a company, after timely notice to the company, to present proposals for shareholder action in our proxy statement where such proposals are consistent with applicable law, pertain to matters appropriate for shareholder action and are not properly omitted by company action in accordance with the proxy rules. The WSI Industries, Inc. 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is expected to be held on or about January 2, 2014 and proxy materials in connection with that meeting are expected to be mailed on or about November 29, 2013. Shareholder proposals prepared in accordance with the Commission’s proxy rules must be received at our corporate office on or before August 2, 2013, in order to be considered for inclusion in the Board of Directors’ proxy statement and proxy card for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Any such proposals must be in writing and signed by the shareholder.

Pursuant to our Amended and Restated Bylaws, in order for any other proposal to be properly brought before the next annual meeting by a shareholder, including a nominee for director to be considered at such annual meeting, the shareholder must give written notice of such shareholder’s intent to bring a matter before the annual meeting, or nominate the director, in a timely manner. To be timely under our Amended and Restated Bylaws, the notice must be given by such shareholder to the Secretary of WSI Industries not less than 45 days nor more than 75 days prior to a meeting date corresponding to the previous year’s annual meeting. Each such notice must set forth certain information with respect to the shareholder who intends to bring such matter before the meeting and the business desired to be conducted, as set forth in greater detail above under “Corporate Governance – Director Nominations” and in our Amended and Restated Bylaws. In addition, if we receive notice of a shareholder proposal less than 45 days before the date on which we first mailed our materials for the prior year’s annual meeting, such proposal also will be considered untimely pursuant to Rules 14a-4 and 14a-5(e) and the persons named in proxies solicited by the Board of Directors for our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders may exercise discretionary voting power with respect to such proposal.

OTHER BUSINESS

The WSI Industries Board of Directors knows of no matters other than the foregoing to be brought before the Annual Meeting. However, the enclosed proxy gives discretionary authority in the event that any additional matters should be presented.

Our Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2012 is being mailed to shareholders with this proxy statement. Shareholders may receive without charge a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, including financial statements and schedules thereto, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, by writing to: WSI Industries, Inc., 213 Chelsea Road, Monticello, MN 55362, Attention: Paul D. Sheely, or by calling us at (763) 295-9202.

	By Order of the Board of Directors



	Michael J. Pudil,
	Chairman