UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2009
Commission File Number 0-18051
DENNY’S CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware |
13-3487402 | |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of |
(I.R.S. Employer | |
|
incorporation or organization |
Identification No.) |
203 East Main Street
Spartanburg, South Carolina 29319-0001
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(864) 597-8000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨
Accelerated filer þ
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No þ
As of October 27, 2009, 96,605,496 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $.01 per share, were outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Page | |
2
Denny’s Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
|
Quarter Ended |
Three Quarters Ended |
|||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Company restaurant sales |
$ |
116,579 |
$ |
160,608 |
$ |
377,655 |
$ |
493,434 |
||||||||
|
Franchise and license revenue |
29,485 |
28,667 |
89,982 |
82,109 |
||||||||||||
|
Total operating revenue |
146,064 |
189,275 |
467,637 |
575,543 |
||||||||||||
|
Costs of company restaurant sales: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Product costs |
26,924 |
38,811 |
88,513 |
119,790 |
||||||||||||
|
Payroll and benefits |
44,712 |
65,582 |
154,623 |
208,331 |
||||||||||||
|
Occupancy |
7,808 |
9,475 |
24,908 |
30,003 |
||||||||||||
|
Other operating expenses |
18,147 |
25,384 |
56,739 |
75,322 |
||||||||||||
|
Total costs of company restaurant sales |
97,591 |
139,252 |
324,783 |
433,446 |
||||||||||||
|
Costs of franchise and license revenue |
10,308 |
8,757 |
32,295 |
25,448 |
||||||||||||
|
General and administrative expenses |
14,313 |
14,894 |
44,067 |
46,046 |
||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization |
7,865 |
9,977 |
24,592 |
30,110 |
||||||||||||
|
Operating gains, losses and other charges, net |
(2,648 |
) |
(4,294 |
) |
(6,101 |
) |
(9,980 |
) | ||||||||
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
127,429 |
168,586 |
419,636 |
525,070 |
||||||||||||
|
Operating income |
18,635 |
20,689 |
48,001 |
50,473 |
||||||||||||
|
Other expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Interest expense, net |
8,117 |
8,761 |
24,847 |
26,845 |
||||||||||||
|
Other nonoperating expense (income), net |
(363 |
) |
677 |
(1,594 |
) |
4,436 |
||||||||||
|
Total other expenses, net |
7,754 |
9,438 |
23,253 |
31,281 |
||||||||||||
|
Net income before income taxes |
10,881 |
11,251 |
24,748 |
19,192 |
||||||||||||
|
Provision for income taxes |
848 |
689 |
1,072 |
1,355 |
||||||||||||
|
Net income |
$ |
10,033 |
$ |
10,562 |
$ |
23,676 |
$ |
17,837 |
||||||||
|
Net income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Basic |
$ |
0.10 |
$ |
0.11 |
$ |
0.25 |
$ |
0.19 |
||||||||
|
Diluted |
$ |
0.10 |
$ |
0.11 |
$ |
0.24 |
$ |
0.18 |
||||||||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Basic |
96,506 |
95,333 |
96,221 |
95,059 |
||||||||||||
|
Diluted |
99,158 |
98,332 |
98,295 |
99,191 |
||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
3
Denny’s Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
|
September 30, 2009 |
December 31, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Assets |
||||||||
|
Current Assets: |
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
29,886 |
$ |
21,042 |
||||
|
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $786 and $475, respectively |
12,620 |
15,146 |
||||||
|
Inventories |
4,141 |
5,455 |
||||||
|
Assets held for sale |
5,019 |
2,285 |
||||||
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
14,223 |
9,531 |
||||||
|
Total Current Assets |
65,889 |
53,459 |
||||||
|
Property, net of accumulated depreciation of $262,533 and $284,933, respectively |
134,777 |
159,978 |
||||||
|
Other Assets: |
||||||||
|
Goodwill |
38,342 |
40,006 |
||||||
|
Intangible assets, net |
55,997 |
58,832 |
||||||
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
3,011 |
3,879 |
||||||
|
Other noncurrent assets |
32,702 |
31,041 |
||||||
|
Total Assets |
$ |
330,718 |
$ |
347,195 |
||||
|
Liabilities and Shareholders' Deficit |
||||||||
|
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||
|
Current maturities of notes and debentures |
$ |
2,431 |
$ |
1,403 |
||||
|
Current maturities of capital lease obligations |
3,549 |
3,535 |
||||||
|
Accounts payable |
17,550 |
25,255 |
||||||
|
Other current liabilities |
72,260 |
76,924 |
||||||
|
Total Current Liabilities |
95,790 |
107,117 |
||||||
|
Long-Term Liabilities: |
||||||||
|
Notes and debentures, less current maturities |
279,496 |
300,617 |
||||||
|
Capital lease obligations, less current maturities |
20,125 |
22,084 |
||||||
|
Liability for insurance claims, less current portion |
23,780 |
25,832 |
||||||
|
Deferred income taxes |
12,995 |
12,345 |
||||||
|
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits |
45,262 |
53,237 |
||||||
|
Total Long-Term Liabilities |
381,658 |
414,115 |
||||||
|
Total Liabilities |
477,448 |
521,232 |
||||||
|
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
|
Total Shareholders’ Deficit |
(146,730 |
) |
(174,037 |
) | ||||
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit |
$ |
330,718 |
$ |
347,195 |
||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Denny’s Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
|
Common Stock |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive |
Total Shareholders' |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares |
Amount |
Paid-in Capital |
Deficit |
Loss, Net |
Deficit |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
95,713 |
$ |
957 |
$ |
538,911 |
$ |
(688,984 |
) |
$ |
(24,921 |
) |
$ |
(174,037 |
) | ||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income |
— |
— |
— |
23,676 |
— |
23,676 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization of unrealized loss on hedged
transactions, net of tax |
— |
— |
— |
— |
773 |
773 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income |
— |
— |
— |
23,676 |
773 |
24,449 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation on equity classified
awards |
— |
— |
2,756 |
— |
— |
2,756 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Issuance of common stock for share-based compensation |
806 |
8 |
(8 |
) |
— |
— |
— |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Exercise of common stock options |
86 |
1 |
101 |
— |
— |
102 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance, September 30, 2009 |
96,605 |
$ |
966 |
$ |
541,760 |
$ |
(665,308 |
) |
$ |
(24,148 |
) |
$ |
(146,730 |
) | ||||||||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Denny’s Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
|
Three Quarters Ended |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
||||||||
|
Net income |
$ |
23,676 |
$ |
17,837 |
||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization |
24,592 |
30,110 |
||||||
|
Operating gains, losses and other charges, net |
(6,101 |
) |
(9,980 |
) | ||||
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
811 |
827 |
||||||
|
(Gain) loss on early extinguishment of debt |
40 |
(30 |
) | |||||
|
(Gain) loss on interest rate swap |
(1,486 |
) |
3,094 |
|||||
|
Deferred income tax expense |
650 |
565 |
||||||
|
Share-based compensation |
3,899 |
2,511 |
||||||
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and dispositions: |
||||||||
|
Decrease (increase) in assets: |
||||||||
|
Receivables |
3,313 |
3,009 |
||||||
|
Inventories |
1,314 |
1,066 |
||||||
|
Other current assets |
(4,691 |
) |
(3,367 |
) | ||||
|
Other assets |
(2,175 |
) |
(2,909 |
) | ||||
|
Increase (decrease) in liabilities: |
||||||||
|
Accounts payable |
(2,949 |
) |
(9,416 |
) | ||||
|
Accrued salaries and vacations |
(3,009 |
) |
(8,225 |
) | ||||
|
Accrued taxes |
1,105 |
794 |
||||||
|
Other accrued liabilities |
(7,107 |
) |
(8,310 |
) | ||||
|
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits |
(4,482 |
) |
(9,622 |
) | ||||
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
27,400 |
7,954 |
||||||
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
||||||||
|
Purchase of property |
(12,484 |
) |
(21,173 |
) | ||||
|
Proceeds from disposition of property |
20,730 |
31,391 |
||||||
|
Net cash flows provided by investing activities |
8,246 |
10,218 |
||||||
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
||||||||
|
Long-term debt payments |
(22,906 |
) |
(19,208 |
) | ||||
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
102 |
980 |
||||||
|
Tax withholding on share-based payments |
(253 |
) |
— |
|||||
|
Net bank overdrafts |
(3,745 |
) |
(87 |
) | ||||
|
Net cash flows used in financing activities |
(26,802 |
) |
(18,315 |
) | ||||
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
8,844 |
(143 |
) | |||||
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at: |
||||||||
|
Beginning of period |
21,042 |
21,565 |
||||||
|
End of period |
$ |
29,886 |
$ |
21,422 |
||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Denny’s Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Introduction and Basis of Reporting
Denny’s Corporation, or Denny’s, is one of America’s largest family-style restaurant chains. At September 30, 2009, the Denny’s brand consisted of 1,545 restaurants, 1,289 (83%) of which were franchised/licensed restaurants and 256 (17%) of which were company-owned and operated.
The following table shows the unit activity for the quarter and three quarters ended September 30, 2009 and September 24, 2008:
|
Quarter Ended |
Three Quarters Ended |
|||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
|
Company-owned restaurants, beginning of period |
263 | 354 | 315 | 394 | ||||||||||||
|
Units opened |
— | — | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||
|
Units sold to franchisees |
(7 | ) | (21 | ) | (59 | ) | (62 | ) | ||||||||
|
Units closed |
— | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||||
|
End of period |
256 | 332 | 256 | 332 | ||||||||||||
|
Franchised and licensed restaurants, beginning of
period |
1,281 | 1,191 | 1,226 | 1,152 | ||||||||||||
|
Units opened |
9 | 8 | 29 | 19 | ||||||||||||
|
Units purchased from Company |
7 | 21 | 59 | 62 | ||||||||||||
|
Units closed |
(8 | ) | (14 | ) | (25 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||||||
|
End of period |
1,289 | 1,206 | 1,289 | 1,206 | ||||||||||||
|
Total company-owned, franchised and licensed
restaurants, end of period |
1,545 | 1,538 | 1,545 | 1,538 | ||||||||||||
Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Therefore, certain information and notes normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted.
In our opinion, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim periods presented have been included. Such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions; however,
we believe that our estimates, including those for the above-described items, are reasonable.
These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, both of which are contained in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire fiscal year ending December 30, 2009.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Effective September 30, 2009, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification TM (“FASB ASC”) 105-10-05 (Prior authoritative literature: Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - a replacement of FASB Statement 162”), which provides for the FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM (the “Codification”)
to become the single official source of authoritative, nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP"). The Codification does not change U.S. GAAP, but combines all authoritative standards into a comprehensive, topically organized online database. The adoption of FASB ASC 105-10-05 impacted the Company's financial statement disclosures, as all references to authoritative accounting literature will be in accordance with the Codification.
Effective July 1, 2009, we adopted FASB ASC 855-10 (Prior authoritative literature: SFAS 165, “Subsequent Events”), which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The adoption of FASB
ASC 855-10 did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 18.
Effective July 1, 2009, we adopted FASB ASC 825-10-65 (Prior authoritative literature: FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board 28-1, "Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments"), which amends previous guidance to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments
for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. The adoption of FASB ASC 825-10-65 did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Effective July 1, 2009, we adopted FASB ASC 320-10-65 (Prior authoritative literature: FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, "Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments"), which amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation
and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This FASB ASC does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. The adoption of FASB ASC 320-10-65 did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Effective July 1, 2009, we adopted FASB ASC 820-10-65 (Prior authoritative literature: FSP FAS 157-4, "Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly"), which provides additional guidance for estimating fair value when the
volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. This FASB ASC also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. The adoption of FASB ASC 820-10-65 did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Effective January 1, 2009, the first day of fiscal 2009, we adopted FASB ASC 350-30 and FASB ASC 275-10-50 (Prior authoritative literature, FSP FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets”), which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine
the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. We will apply these FASB ASCs prospectively to intangible assets acquired subsequent to the adoption date. The adoption of FASB ASC 350-30 and FASB ASC 275-10-50 had no impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted FASB ASC 815-10-65 (Prior authoritative literature: SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”), which amends and expands previously existing guidance on derivative instruments to require tabular disclosure of the fair value of derivative instruments and their
gains and losses. This FASB ASC also requires disclosure regarding the credit-risk related contingent features in derivative agreements, counterparty credit risk, and strategies and objectives for using derivative instruments. The adoption of FASB ASC 815-10-65 did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 8.
During 2008, we adopted FASB ASC 820-10 (Prior authoritative literature: FSP FAS 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement 157"), which deferred the provisions of previously issued fair value guidance for nonfinancial assets and liabilities to the first fiscal period beginning after November 15, 2008. Deferred nonfinancial
assets and liabilities include items such as goodwill and other nonamortizable intangibles. Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted the fair value guidance for nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The adoption of FASB ASC 820-10 did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 6.
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted FASB ASC 810-10-65 (Prior authoritative literature: SFAS 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51"), which amends previously issued guidance to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which is sometimes referred to as minority interest, is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in our Consolidated Financial Statements. Among other requirements, this FASB ASC requires that the consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated income statement.
The adoption of FASB ASC 810-10-65 did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted FASB ASC 805-10, (Prior authoritative literature: SFAS 141R, "Business Combinations"), which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in an acquiree
and the goodwill acquired. We will apply FASB ASC 805-10 to any business combinations subsequent to adoption. In addition, this FASB ASC requires that any additional reversal of deferred tax asset valuation allowance established in connection with our fresh start reporting on January 7, 1998 be recorded as a component of income tax expense rather than as a reduction to the goodwill established in connection with the fresh start reporting. See Note 12.
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted FASB ASC 805-20 (Prior authoritative literature: FSP FAS 141R-1, "Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies"), which amends FASB ASC 805-10 to require that an acquirer recognize at fair value, at the acquisition date, an asset acquired
or a liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of that asset or liability can be determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition-date fair value of such an asset acquired or liability assumed cannot be determined, the acquirer should apply the provisions of the guidance on contingencies to determine whether the contingency should be recognized at the acquisition date or after such date. The adoption of FASB ASC 805-20 did not have
a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
There have been no other material changes to our significant accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Note 3. Assets Held for Sale
Assets held for sale of $5.0 million and $2.3 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, include restaurants to be sold to franchisees and real estate to be sold to third parties. We expect to sell each of these assets within 12 months. Our Credit Facility (defined in Note 7) requires us to make mandatory prepayments
to reduce outstanding indebtedness with the net cash proceeds from the sale of specified real estate properties, restaurant assets and restaurant operations to franchisees, net of a voluntary $10.0 million annual exclusion related to proceeds from the sale of restaurant operations to franchisees and a voluntary $10.0 million annual exclusion related to proceeds from the sale of restaurant assets. As of September 30, 2009, as a
result of the mandatory prepayment requirements, we classified $1.3 million of our long-term debt as a current liability in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. This amount represents the required prepayment based on the net book value of the specified properties as of the balance sheet date less the remaining balance of the annual exclusion. As of December 31, 2008, no reclassification of long-term debt to current liabilities was required.
As a result of classifying certain assets as held for sale, we recognized impairment charges of $0.4 million for the three quarters ended September 30, 2009 and $0.2 million for the quarter and three quarters ended September 24, 2008. This expense is included as a component of operating gains, losses and other charges, net in our Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Note 4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in carrying amounts of goodwill for the three quarters ended September 30, 2009 are as follows:
|
(In thousands) |
||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
$ |
40,006 |
||
|
Write-offs associated with sale of restaurants |
(1,664 |
) | ||
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
$ |
38,342 |
||
The following table reflects goodwill and intangible assets as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
September 30, 2009 |
December 31, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||
|
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
|||||||||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Goodwill |
$ |
38,342 |
$ |
— |
$ |
40,006 |
$ |
— |
||||||||
|
Intangible assets with indefinite lives: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Trade names |
$ |
42,450 |
$ |
— |
$ |
42,438 |
$ |
— |
||||||||
|
Liquor licenses |
262 |
— |
262 |
— |
||||||||||||
|
Intangible assets with definite lives: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Franchise and license agreements |
50,786 |
37,594 |
55,332 |
39,303 |
||||||||||||
|
Foreign license agreements |
241 |
148 |
241 |
138 |
||||||||||||
|
Intangible assets |
$ |
93,739 |
$ |
37,742 |
$ |
98,273 |
$ |
39,441 |
||||||||
|
Other assets with definite lives: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Software development costs |
$ |
32,630 |
$ |
27,888 |
$ |
31,979 |
$ |
26,446 |
||||||||
Note 5. Operating Gains, Losses and Other Charges, Net
Operating gains, losses and other charges, net are comprised of the following:
|
Quarter Ended |
Three Quarters Ended |
|||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Gains on sales of assets and other, net |
$ |
(3,127 |
) |
$ |
(5,290 |
) |
$ |
(7,159 |
) |
$ |
(18,214 |
) | ||||
|
Restructuring charges and exit costs |
479 |
752 |
235 |
7,506 |
||||||||||||
|
Impairment charges |
— |
244 |
823 |
728 |
||||||||||||
|
Operating gains, losses and other charges, net |
$ |
(2,648 |
) |
$ |
(4,294 |
) |
$ |
(6,101 |
) |
$ |
(9,980 |
) | ||||
Gains on Sales of Assets
Proceeds and gains on sales of assets were comprised of the following:
|
Quarter Ended
September 30, 2009 |
Quarter Ended
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||
|
Net Proceeds |
Gains |
Net Proceeds |
Gains |
|||||||||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Sales of restaurant operations and related real estate
to franchisees |
$ |
2,136 |
$ |
580 |
$ |
8,242 |
$ |
3,496 |
||||||||
|
Sales of other real estate assets |
5,753 |
2,437 |
2,198 |
1,764 |
||||||||||||
|
Recognition of deferred gains |
— |
110 |
— |
30 |
||||||||||||
|
Total |
$ |
7,889 |
$ |
3,127 |
$ |
10,440 |
$ |
5,290 |
||||||||
8
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as part of our Franchise Growth Initiative ("FGI"), we recognized $0.6 million of gains on the sale of seven restaurant operations to four franchisees for net proceeds of $2.1 million. During the quarter ended September 24, 2008, we recognized $3.5 million of gains on the sale of 21
restaurant operations to six franchisees for net proceeds of $8.2 million, which included a note receivable of $0.3 million.
|
Three Quarters Ended
September 30, 2009 |
Three Quarters Ended
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||
|
Net Proceeds |
Gains |
Net Proceeds |
Gains |
|||||||||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Sales of restaurant operations and related real estate
to franchisees |
$ |
13,887 |
$ |
3,383 |
$ |
30,241 |
$ |
15,439 |
||||||||
|
Sales of other real estate assets |
8,507 |
3,571 |
3,820 |
2,683 |
||||||||||||
|
Recognition of deferred gains |
— |
205 |
— |
92 |
||||||||||||
|
Total |
$ |
22,394 |
$ |
7,159 |
$ |
34,061 |
$ |
18,214 |
||||||||
During the three quarters ended September 30, 2009, as part of our FGI, we recognized $3.4 million of gains on the sale of 59 restaurant operations to 14 franchisees for net proceeds of $13.9 million, which included notes receivable of $1.5 million. During the three quarters ended September 24, 2008, we recognized $15.4
million of gains on the sale of 62 restaurant operations to 17 franchisees for net proceeds of $30.2 million, which included notes receivable of $2.7 million.
Restructuring Charges and Exit Costs
Restructuring charges and exit costs were comprised of the following:
|
Quarter Ended |
Three Quarters Ended |
|||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Exit costs |
$ |
376 |
$ |
821 |
$ |
(369 |
) |
$ |
2,476 |
|||||||
|
Severance and other restructuring charges |
103 |
(69 |
) |
604 |
5,030 |
|||||||||||
|
Total restructuring and exit costs |
$ |
479 |
$ |
752 |
$ |
235 |
$ |
7,506 |
||||||||
The components of the change in accrued exit cost liabilities are as follows:
|
(In thousands) |
||||
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
$ |
9,239 |
||
|
Provisions for units closed during the year (1) |
149 |
|||
|
Changes in estimates of accrued exit costs, net (1) |
(518 |
) | ||
|
Payments, net of sublease receipts |
(2,966 |
) | ||
|
Interest accretion |
562 |
|||
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
6,466 |
|||
|
Less current portion included in other current liabilities |
1,698 |
|||
|
Long-term portion included in other noncurrent liabilities |
$ |
4,768 |
||
|
(1) |
Included as a component of operating gains, losses and other charges, net. |
Estimated net cash payments related to exit cost liabilities in the next five years are as follows:
|
(In thousands) |
||||
|
Remainder of 2009 |
$ |
544 |
||
|
2010 |
1,776 |
|||
|
2011 |
1,322 |
|||
|
2012 |
1,057 |
|||
|
2013 |
766 |
|||
|
Thereafter |
2,076 |
|||
|
Total |
7,541 |
|||
|
Less imputed interest |
1,075 |
|||
|
Present value of exit cost liabilities |
$ |
6,466 |
||
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had accrued severance and other restructuring charges of $0.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively. The balance as of September 30, 2009 is expected to be paid during the next 12 months.
Note 6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Effective December 27, 2007, the first day of fiscal 2008, we adopted the Codification's guidance on fair value measurements for financial assets and liabilities, as well as any other assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in financial statements. Effective January 1, 2009, the first day of fiscal 2009,
we applied the Codification's guidance on fair value measurements to nonfinancial assets and liabilities.
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
|
Fair Value Measurements as of September 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Total |
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities
(Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3) |
Valuation Technique | |||||||||||||
|
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
|
Deferred compensation plan
investments |
$ |
5,319 |
$ |
5,319 |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
market approach | ||||||||
|
Interest rate swap liability |
(2,287 |
) |
— |
(2,287 |
) |
— |
income approach | ||||||||||
|
Total |
$ |
3,032 |
$ |
5,319 |
$ |
(2,287 |
) |
$ |
— |
||||||||
There were no assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2009.
9
Fair Value of Long-Term Debt
The book value and estimated fair value of our long-term debt, excluding capital lease obligations, was as follows:
|
September 30, 2009 |
December 31, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Book value: |
||||||||
|
Fixed rate long-term debt |
$ |
175,275 |
$ |
175,368 |
||||
|
Variable rate long-term debt |
106,652 |
126,652 |
||||||
|
Long term debt excluding capital lease obligations |
$ |
281,927 |
$ |
302,020 |
||||
|
Estimate fair value: |
||||||||
|
Fixed rate long-term debt |
$ |
178,232 |
$ |
122,868 |
||||
|
Variable rate long-term debt |
106,652 |
126,652 |
||||||
|
Long term debt excluding capital lease obligations |
$ |
284,884 |
$ |
249,520 |
||||
The difference between the estimated fair value of long-term debt compared with its historical cost reported in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 relates primarily to market quotations for our Denny's Holdings, Inc. 10% Senior Notes due 2012 (the "10% Notes").
Note 7. Long-Term Debt
Credit Facility
Our subsidiaries, Denny's, Inc. and Denny's Realty, LLC (the "Borrowers"), have a senior secured credit agreement consisting of a $50 million revolving credit facility (including up to $10 million for a revolving letter of credit facility), a $106.7 million term loan and an additional $37 million letter of credit facility (together, the "Credit
Facility"). At September 30, 2009, we had outstanding letters of credit of $33.4 million under our letter of credit facility. There were no outstanding letters of credit under our revolving facility and no revolving loans outstanding at September 30, 2009. These balances result in availability of $3.6 million under our letter of credit facility and $50.0 million under the revolving facility.
The revolving facility matures on December 15, 2011. The term loan and the $37 million letter of credit facility mature on March 31, 2012. The term loan amortizes in equal quarterly installments at a rate equal to approximately 1% per annum with all remaining amounts due on the maturity date. The Credit Facility is available for working capital,
capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes. We will be required to make mandatory prepayments under certain circumstances (such as required payments related to asset sales) typical for this type of credit facility and may make certain optional prepayments under the Credit Facility. We believe that our estimated cash flows from operations for 2009, combined with our capacity for additional borrowings under our Credit Facility, will enable us to meet our anticipated cash requirements and fund capital
expenditures over the next twelve months.
The Credit Facility is guaranteed by Denny's and its subsidiaries and is secured by substantially all of the assets of Denny's and its subsidiaries. In addition, the Credit Facility is secured by first-priority mortgages on 107 company-owned real estate assets. The Credit Facility contains certain financial covenants (i.e., maximum total
debt to EBITDA (as defined under the Credit Facility) ratio requirements, maximum senior secured debt to EBITDA ratio requirements, minimum fixed charge coverage ratio requirements and limitations on capital expenditures), negative covenants, conditions precedent, material adverse change provisions, events of default and other terms, conditions and provisions customarily found in credit agreements for facilities and transactions of this type. We were in compliance with the terms of the Credit Facility as of September
30, 2009.
A commitment fee of 0.5% is paid on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility. Interest on loans under the revolving facility is payable at per annum rates equal to LIBOR plus 250 basis points and will adjust over time based on our leverage ratio. Interest on the term loan and letter of credit facility is payable at per annum
rates equal to LIBOR plus 200 basis points. Prior to considering the impact of our interest rate swap described below, the weighted-average interest rate under the term loan was 2.9% and 5.1% as of September 30, 2009 and September 24, 2008, respectively. Taking into consideration our interest rate swap the weighted-average interest rate under the term loan was 6.6% and 6.4% as of September 30, 2009 and September 24, 2008, respectively.
Note 8. Derivative Financial Instruments
We utilize derivative financial instruments to manage our exposure to interest rate risk and commodity risk in relation to natural gas costs. We do not enter into derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Interest Rate Swap
We manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on our variable rate debt by entering into interest rate swaps. The fair value of the swaps is estimated based on quoted market prices and is subject to market risk as the instruments may become less valuable in case of changes in market conditions or interest rates. We manage
our exposure to counterparty credit risk by entering into derivative financial instruments with high-quality financial institutions that can be expected to fully perform under the terms of such agreements. We monitor the credit rating of these institutions on a quarterly basis. We do not require collateral or other security to support derivative financial instruments, if any, with credit risk. The interest rate swap is considered an obligation under the Credit Facility, as it was entered
into with counterparties that are also lenders under the Credit Facility. The security interest and collateral provided by the Credit Facility is also available to the swap counterparties. Our counterparty credit exposure is limited to the positive fair value of contracts at the reporting date. Notional amounts of derivative financial instruments do not represent exposure to credit loss.
In 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $150 million and designated it as a cash flow hedge of our interest rate exposure on the first $150 million of floating rate debt. Under the terms of the swap, we pay a fixed rate of 4.8925% on the $150 million notional amount and receive payments from the counterparties
based on the 3-month LIBOR rate for a term ending on March 30, 2010, effectively resulting in a fixed rate of 6.8925% on the $150 million notional amount at the inception of the swap. Interest rate differentials paid or received under the swap agreement are recognized as adjustments to interest expense.
In accordance with hedge accounting, to the extent the swap was effective in offsetting the variability of the hedged cash flows, changes in the fair value of the swap were reported as adjustments to other comprehensive income. At December 26, 2007, we determined that a portion of the underlying cash flows related to the swap (i.e., interest
payments on $150 million of floating rate debt) were no longer probable of occurring over the term of the swap as a result of the probability of paying the debt down below $150 million. As a result, we discontinued hedge accounting treatment. The losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 26, 2007 are amortized to other nonoperating expense over the remaining term of the interest rate swap. See Note 11. Additionally, changes in the fair value of the swap are recorded
in other nonoperating expense.
On March 26, 2008, we terminated $50 million notional amount of the interest rate swap. The termination resulted in a $2.4 million cash payment, which was made during the second quarter of 2008.
Natural Gas Hedge Contracts
We enter into natural gas hedge contracts in order to limit our exposure to price increases for natural gas. These pay fixed/receive floating agreements are based on NYMEX prices. As of September 30, 2009, there were no outstanding contracts related to our natural gas purchases. Realized gains (losses) on the contracts are recorded as
utility cost which is a component of other operating expenses. The contracts are not accounted for under hedge accounting, and therefore, changes in the contracts' fair value are recorded in other nonoperating expense. Under the terms of the natural gas hedge contracts, both parties may be required to provide collateral related to any liability positions held. As of September 30, 2009, collateral of $0.6 million was held by the counterparty in an interest-bearing cash account.
10
The fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments is included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
|
Interest
Rate Swap |
Natural Gas Contracts |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009: |
||||||||
|
Other current liabilities |
$ |
(2,287 |
) |
$ |
— |
| ||
|
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits |
— |
— |
||||||
|
Fair value of derivative instrument |
$ |
(2,287 |
) |
$ |
— |
| ||
|
December 31, 2008: |
||||||||
|
Other current liabilities |
$ |
— |
$ |
(933 |
) | |||
|
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits |
(4,545 |
) |
— |
|||||
|
Fair value of derivative instrument |
$ |
(4,545 |
) |
$ |
(933 |
) | ||
The interest rate swap is currently in liability position, therefore there is no significant risk of loss related to counterparty credit risk.
The gains (losses) recognized in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as a result of the interest rate swap and natural gas hedge contracts are as follows:
|
Quarter Ended |
Three Quarters Ended |
|||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Realized gains (losses): |
||||||||||||||||
|
Interest rate swap - included as a component of
interest expense |
$ |
(1,086 |
) |
$ |
(530 |
) |
$ |
(2,880 |
) |
$ |
(1,072 |
) | ||||
|
Natural gas contracts - included as a component
of utility expense, which is included in other operating expenses |
$ |
(464 |
) |
$ |
(166 |
) |
$ |
(1,484 |
) |
$ |
(166 |
) | ||||
|
Unrealized gains (losses) included as a component
of nonoperating expense: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Interest rate swap |
$ |
611 |
$ |
(46 |
) |
$ |
1,486 |
$ |
(3,094 |
) | ||||||
|
Natural gas contracts |
$ |
405 |
$ |
(154 |
) |
$ |
811 |
$ |
(154 |
) | ||||||
The unrealized gains (losses) related to the interest rate swap include both the changes in the fair value of the swap and the amortization of losses previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Note 9. Defined Benefit Plans
The components of net pension cost of our pension plan and other defined benefit plans are as follows:
|
Pension Plan |
Other Defined Benefit Plans |
|||||||||||||||
|
Quarter Ended |
Quarter Ended |
|||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Service cost |
$ |
98 |
$ |
88 |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
||||||||
|
Interest cost |
863 |
847 |
37 |
49 |
||||||||||||
|
Expected return on plan assets |
(866 |
) |
(969 |
) |
— |
— |
||||||||||
|
Amortization of net loss |
327 |
151 |
4 |
4 |
||||||||||||
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ |
422 |
$ |
117 |
$ |
41 |
$ |
53 |
||||||||
|
Pension Plan |
Other Defined Benefit Plans |
|||||||||||||||
|
Three Quarters Ended |
Three Quarters Ended |
|||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Service cost |
$ |
293 |
$ |
263 |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
||||||||
|
Interest cost |
2,589 |
2,541 |
113 |
146 |
||||||||||||
|
Expected return on plan assets |
(2,598 |
) |
(2,908 |
) |
— |
— |
||||||||||
|
Amortization of net loss |
980 |
451 |
11 |
14 |
||||||||||||
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ |
1,264 |
$ |
347 |
$ |
124 |
$ |
160 |
||||||||
We made contributions of $1.1 million and $1.3 million to our qualified pension plan during the three quarters ended September 30, 2009 and September 24, 2008, respectively. We made contributions of $0.1 million and $0.7 million to our other defined benefit plans during the three quarters ended September 30, 2009 and September 24, 2008, respectively. We
expect to contribute an additional $0.1 million to our other defined benefit plans during the remainder of fiscal 2009, however no additional contributions are expected to be made to the qualified pension plan.
Additional minimum pension liability of $23.7 million is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Deficit and Comprehensive Loss as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Note 10. Share-Based Compensation
Total share-based compensation included as a component of net income was as follows:
|
Quarter Ended |
Three Quarters Ended |
|||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Share-based compensation related to liability classified restricted stock units |
$ |
547 |
$ |
(119 |
) |
$ |
1,143 |
$ |
(80 |
) | ||||||
|
Share based compensation related to equity classified awards: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Stock options |
$ |
349 |
$ |
396 |
$ |
855 |
$ |
1,321 |
||||||||
|
Restricted stock units |
226 |
511 |
1,669 |
1,086 |
||||||||||||
|
Board deferred stock units |
75 |
61 |
232 |
184 |
||||||||||||
|
Total share-based compensation related to equity classified awards |
650 |
968 |
2,756 |
2,591 |
||||||||||||
|
Total share-based compensation |
$ |
1,197 |
$ |
849 |
$ |
3,899 |
$ |
2,511 |
||||||||
11
Stock Options
During the three quarters ended September 30, 2009, we granted approximately 1.4 million stock options to certain employees. These stock options vest evenly over 3 years and have a 10-year contractual life.
The weighted average fair value per option for options granted during the three quarters ended September 30, 2009 was $0.81. The fair value of these stock options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Use of this option pricing model requires the input of subjective assumptions. These assumptions
include estimating the length of time employees will retain their vested stock options before exercising them (“expected term”), the estimated volatility of our common stock price over the expected term and the number of options that will ultimately not complete their vesting requirements (“forfeitures”). Changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimate of the fair value of share-based compensation and, consequently, the related amount recognized in the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We used the following weighted average assumptions for the stock option grants for the three quarters ended September 30, 2009:
|
Dividend yield |
0.0 |
% | ||
|
Expected volatility |
57.5 |
% | ||
|
Risk-free interest rate |
1.82 |
% | ||
|
Weighted-average expected term |
4.6 years |
|||
The dividend yield assumption was based on our dividend payment history and expectations of future dividend payments. The expected volatility was based on the historical volatility of our stock for a period approximating the expected life. The risk-free interest rate was based on published U.S. Treasury spot rates in effect at the time of
grant with terms approximating the expected life of the option. The weighted average expected term of the options represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding based on historical trends.
As of September 30, 2009, we had approximately $1.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock option awards outstanding, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average of 2.0 years.
Restricted Stock Units
In March 2009, we granted approximately 0.3 million performance shares (which are equity classified) and 0.3 million cash-based performance units (which are liability classified) to certain employees. The performance shares have a grant date fair value of $1.84 per share. The performance units were valued at $2.00 per unit. The performance
period is the three year fiscal period beginning January 1, 2009 and ending December 28, 2011. The performance shares and units will vest and be earned (from 0% to 200% of the target award for each such increment) at the end of the performance period based on the Total Shareholder Return of our stock compared to the Total Shareholder Returns of a group of peer companies. Subsequent to the vesting period, the earned performance shares will be paid to the holder in shares of common stock and the performance units
will be paid to the holder in cash, provided the holder is then still employed with Denny’s or an affiliate. As these performance shares contain a market condition, the compensation expense is based on the Monte Carlo valuation method, which utilizes multiple input variables to determine the probability of the Company achieving the market condition and the fair value of the award.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, we made payments of $0.4 million (before taxes) in cash and issued 0.4 million shares of common stock, net of 0.1 million shares that were used to pay taxes, related to restricted stock unit awards. During the three quarters ended September 30, 2009, we made payments of $2.2 million (before taxes) in cash and issued 0.7 million shares of common stock, net of 0.1
million shares that were used to pay taxes, related to restricted stock unit awards.
Accrued compensation expense included as a component of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet was as follows:
|
September 30, 2009 |
December 31, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Liability classified restricted stock units: |
||||||||
|
Other current liabilities |
$ |
1,425 |
$ |
2,028 |
||||
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
$ |
422 |
$ |
1,110 |
||||
|
Equity classified restricted stock units: |
||||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital |
$ |
5,218 |
$ |
5,073 |
||||
As of September 30, 2009, we had approximately $2.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost (approximately $0.7 million for liability classified units and approximately $2.1 million for equity classified units) related to all unvested restricted stock unit awards outstanding, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average of 1.2 years.
Board Deferred Stock Units
During the three quarters ended September 30, 2009, we granted 0.1 million deferred stock units (which are equity classified) with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $2.23 per unit to non-employee members of our Board of Directors. These awards are restricted in that they may not be converted to shares until the recipient has
ceased serving as a member of the Board of Directors for Denny's Corporation, at which time the awards automatically convert to shares of our common stock. During the second quarter of 2009, two board members did not stand for reelection. As a result, their deferred stock units were converted into shares of common stock.
Note 11. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total comprehensive income was $24.4 million and $18.7 million for the three quarters ended September 30, 2009 and September 24, 2008, respectively.
The components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholder’s Deficit and Comprehensive Loss are as follows:
|
September 30, 2009 |
December 31, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Additional minimum pension liability |
$ |
(23,734 |
) |
$ |
(23,734 |
) | ||
|
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap |
(414 |
) |
(1,187 |
) | ||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
$ |
(24,148 |
) |
$ |
(24,921 |
) | ||
Note 12. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes was $0.8 million and $1.1 million for the quarter and three quarters ended September 30, 2009 compared with $0.7 million and $1.4 million for the quarter and three quarters ended September 24, 2008, respectively. The provision for income taxes for the first three quarters of 2009 and 2008 was determined using
our effective rate estimated for the entire fiscal year. The reduction in our effective tax rate for the three quarters ended September 30, 2009 and September 24, 2008 results primarily from the recognition of $0.7 million and $0.6 million of current tax benefits in 2009 and 2008 related to the enactment of certain federal laws during the first quarter of 2009 and the third quarter of 2008, respectively.
We have provided valuation allowances related to any benefits from income taxes resulting from the application of a statutory tax rate to our net operating losses (“NOL”) generated in previous periods. In addition, during 2008, we utilized certain state NOL carryforwards whose valuation allowance was established in connection
with fresh start reporting on January 7, 1998. For the quarter and three quarters ended September 24, 2008, we recognized an increase of approximately $0.1 million and a decrease of less than $0.1 million of federal and state deferred tax expense with a corresponding reduction to goodwill in connection with fresh start reporting. The adoption of the Codification’s guidance on business combinations during the first quarter of 2009 requires that any additional reversal of deferred tax asset valuation
allowance established in connection with fresh start reporting be recorded as a component of income tax expense rather than as a reduction to the goodwill established in connection with the fresh start reporting.
12
Note 13. Net Income Per Share
|
Quarter Ended |
Three Quarters Ended |
|||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||
|
(In thousands, except for per share amounts) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Numerator for basic and diluted net income per share - net income |
$ |
10,033 |
$ |
10,562 |
$ |
23,676 |
$ |
17,837 |
||||||||
|
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Denominator for basic net income per share – weighted average shares |
96,506 |
95,333 |
96,221 |
95,059 |
||||||||||||
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Options |
1,562 |
2,056 |
1,230 |
2,517 |
||||||||||||
|
Restricted stock units and awards |
1,090 |
943 |
844 |
1,615 |
||||||||||||
|
Denominator for diluted net income per share - adjusted weighted average shares and assumed
conversions of dilutive securities |
99,158 |
98,332 |
98,295 |
99,191 |
||||||||||||
|
Basic net income per share |
$ |
0.10 |
$ |
0.11 |
$ |
0.25 |
$ |
0.19 |
||||||||
|
Diluted net income per share |
$ |
0.10 |
$ |
0.11 |
$ |
0.24 |
$ |
0.18 |
||||||||
|
Stock options excluded (1) |
3,038 |
3,670 |
5,671 |
3,409 |
||||||||||||
|
Restricted stock units and awards excluded (1) |
418 |
— |
418 |
— |
||||||||||||
| (1) |
Excluded from diluted weighted-average shares outstanding as the impact would have been antidilutive. |
Note 14. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
|
Three Quarters Ended |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Income taxes paid, net |
$ |
384 |
$ |
1,001 |
||||
|
Interest paid |
$ |
19,229 |
$ |
21,594 |
||||
|
Noncash investing activities: |
||||||||
|
Notes received in connection with disposition of property |
$ |
1,665 |
$ |
2,670 |
||||
|
Execution of direct financing leases |
$ |
2,815 |
$ |
3,007 |
||||
|
Noncash financing activities: |
||||||||
|
Issuance of common stock, pursuant to share-based compensation plans |
$ |
1,823 |
$ |
1,268 |
||||
|
Execution of capital leases |
$ |
1,405 |
$ |
4,516 |
||||
Note 15. Related Party Transactions:
During the quarter and three quarters ended September 30, 2009 and the respective periods ended September 24, 2008, we sold company-owned restaurants to franchisees that are former employees, including a former officer. We received cash proceeds of $1.1 million and $2.2 million and recognized gains of $0.7 million and $0.6 million
from these related party sales during the quarter and three quarters ended September 30, 2009, respectively. We received cash proceeds of $1.0 million and $2.9 million and recognized gains of $0.3 million and losses of $0.1 million from these related party sales during the quarter and three quarters ended September 24, 2008, respectively. In relation to these sales, we may enter into leases or subleases with the franchisees. These leases and subleases are entered into at fair market value.
Note 16. Implementation of New Accounting Standards
In August, 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC Update No. 2009-05 (“Update 2009-05”) to provide guidance on measuring the fair value of liabilities under FASB ASC 820 (Prior authoritative literature: SFAS 157, "Fair Value Measurements"). We are required to adopt Update 2009-05 in the fourth quarter of 2009. We
are currently in the process of assessing the impact that Update 2009-05 may have on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 810-10 (Prior authoritative literature: SFAS 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”), which amends the guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity and modifies the methods allowed for determining the
primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. In addition, this FASB ASC requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and enhanced disclosures related to an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. We are required to adopt FASB ASC 810-10 in the first quarter of 2010. We are currently in the process of assessing the impact that the FASB ASC 810-10 may have on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB ASC 715-20-65 (Prior authoritative literature FASB FSP FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets”), which expands the disclosure requirements about plan assets for defined benefit pension plans and postretirement plans. We are required to adopt FASB
ASC 715-20-65 in the fourth quarter of 2009. We are currently in the process of assessing the impact that FASB ASC 715-20-65 may have on the disclosures in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption.
Note 17. Commitments and Contingencies
There are various claims and pending legal actions against or indirectly involving us, including actions involving employees and guests, other employment related matters, taxes, sales of franchise rights and businesses and other matters. Based on our examination of these matters and our experience to date, we have recorded reserves reflecting
our best estimate of liability, if any, with respect to these matters. However, the ultimate disposition of these matters cannot be determined with certainty. We record legal expenses and other litigation costs as those costs are incurred.
Note 18. Subsequent Events
Subsequent events have been evaluated through October 30, 2009, the date these financial statements were issued. No events required disclosure.
13
Forward-Looking Statements
The following discussion is intended to highlight significant changes in our financial position as of September 30, 2009 and results of operations for the quarter and three quarters ended September 30, 2009 compared to the quarter and three quarters ended September 24, 2008. The forward-looking statements included in Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which reflect our best judgment based on factors currently known, involve risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause our actual performance to be materially different from the performance indicated or implied by such statements. Such factors include, among others: competitive pressures from within the restaurant industry; the level of success of our operating initiatives and advertising and promotional efforts; adverse publicity;
changes in business strategy or development plans; terms and availability of capital; regional weather conditions; overall changes in the general economy (including with regard to energy costs), particularly at the retail level; political environment (including acts of war and terrorism); and other factors included in the discussion below, or in Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors, contained in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Statements of Operations
The following table contains information derived from our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations expressed as a percentage of total operating revenues, except as noted below. Percentages may not add due to rounding.
|
Quarter Ended |
Three Quarters Ended |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Company restaurant sales |
$ |
116,579 |
79.8 |
% |
$ |
160,608 |
84.9 |
% |
$ |
377,655 |
80.8 |
% |
$ |
493,434 |
85.7 |
% | ||||||||||||||||
|
Franchise and license revenue |
29,485 |
20.2 |
% |
28,667 |
15.1 |
% |
89,982 |
19.2 |
% |
82,109 |
14.3 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total operating revenue |
146,064 |
100.0 |
% |
189,275 |
100.0 |
% |
467,637 |
100.0 |
% |
575,543 |
100.0 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Costs of company restaurant sales (a): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Product costs |
26,924 |
23.1 |
% |
38,811 |
24.2 |
% |
88,513 |
23.4 |
% |
119,790 |
24.3 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Payroll and benefits |
44,712 |
38.4 |
% |
65,582 |
40.8 |
% |
154,623 |
40.9 |
% |
208,331 |
42.2 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Occupancy |
7,808 |
6.7 |
% |
9,475 |
5.9 |
% |
24,908 |
6.6 |
% |
30,003 |
6.1 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other operating expenses |
18,147 |
15.6 |
% |
25,384 |
15.8 |
% |
56,739 |
15.0 |
% |
75,322 |
15.3 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total costs of company restaurant sales |
97,591 |
83.7 |
% |
139,252 |
86.7 |
% |
324,783 |
86.0 |
% |
433,446 |
87.8 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Costs of franchise and license revenue (a) |
10,308 |
35.0 |
% |
8,757 |
30.5 |
% |
32,295 |
35.9 |
% |
25,448 |
31.0 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
General and administrative expenses |
14,313 |
9.8 |
% |
14,894 |
7.9 |
% |
44,067 |
9.4 |
% |
46,046 |
8.0 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization |
7,865 |
5.4 |
% |
9,977 |
5.3 |
% |
24,592 |
5.3 |
% |
30,110 |
5.2 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating gains, losses and other charges |
(2,648 |
) |
(1.8 |
%) |
(4,294 |
) |
(2.3 |
%) |
(6,101 |
) |
(1.3 |
%) |
(9,980 |
) |
(1.7 |
%) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
127,429 |
87.2 |
% |
168,586 |
89.1 |
% |
419,636 |
89.7 |
% |
525,070 |
91.2 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating income |
18,635 |
12.8 |
% |
20,689 |
10.9 |
% |
48,001 |
10.3 |
% |
50,473 |
8.8 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest expense, net |
8,117 |
5.6 |
% |
8,761 |
4.6 |
% |
24,847 |
5.3 |
% |
26,845 |
4.7 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other nonoperating expense (income), net |
(363 |
) |
(0.2 |
%) |
677 |
0.4 |
% |
(1,594 |
) |
(0.3 |
%) |
4,436 |
0.8 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total other expenses, net |
7,754 |
5.3 |
% |
9,438 |
5.0 |
% |
23,253 |
5.0 |
% |
31,281 |
5.4 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income before income taxes |
10,881 |
7.4 |
% |
11,251 |
5.9 |
% |
24,748 |
5.3 |
% |
19,192 |
3.3 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Provision for income taxes |
848 |
0.6 |
% |
689 |
0.4 |
% |
1,072 |
0.2 |
% |
1,355 |
0.2 |
% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income |
$ |
10,033 |
6.9 |
% |
$ |
10,562 |
5.6 |
% |
$ |
23,676 |
5.1 |
% |
$ |
17,837 |
3.1 |
% | ||||||||||||||||
|
Other Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Company-owned average unit sales |
$ |
450 |
$ |
459 |
$ |
1,365 |
$ |
1,335 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Franchise average unit sales |
348 |
377 |
1,067 |
1,112 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Company-owned equivalent units (b) |
259 |
348 |
277 |
369 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Franchise equivalent units (b) |
1,285 |
1,195 |
1,266 |
1,177 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Same-store sales increase (decrease) (company- owned) (c)(d) |
(6.6 |
)% |
(2.7 |
)% |
(2.9 |
)% |
(0.9 |
)% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Guest check average increase (d) |
0.8 |
% |
6.7 |
% |
1.1 |
% |
6.3 |
% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Guest count decrease (d) |
(7.3 |
)% |
(8.8 |
)% |
(4.0 |
)% |
(6.7 |
)% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Same-store sales increase (decrease) (franchised and licensed units) (c) (d) |
(7.3 |
)% |
(6.1 |
)% |
(4.5 |
)% |
(3.6 |
)% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________
|
(a) |
Costs of company restaurant sales percentages are as a percentage of company restaurant sales. Costs of franchise and license revenue percentages are as a percentage of franchise and license revenue. All other percentages are as a percentage of total operating revenue. |
|
(b) |
Equivalent units are calculated as the weighted average number of units outstanding during a defined time period. |
|
(c) |
Same-store sales include sales from restaurants that were open the same days in both the current year and prior year. |
|
(d) |
Prior year amounts have not been adjusted for 2008 comparable units. |
14
Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 Compared with Quarter Ended September 24, 2008
|
Quarter Ended |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||
|
Company-owned restaurants, beginning of period |
263 |
354 |
||||||
|
Units opened |
— |
— |
||||||
|
Units sold to franchisees |
(7 |
) |
(21 |
) | ||||
|
Units closed |
— |
(1 |
) | |||||
|
End of period |
256 |
332 |
||||||
|
Franchised and licensed restaurants, beginning of period |
1,281 |
1,191 |
||||||
|
Units opened |
9 |
8 |
||||||
|
Units purchased from Company |
7 |
21 |
||||||
|
Units closed |
(8 |
) |
(14 |
) | ||||
|
End of period |
1,289 |
1,206 |
||||||
|
Total company-owned, franchised and licensed restaurants, end of period |
1,545 |
1,538 |
||||||
Company Restaurant Operations
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, we realized a 6.6% decrease in same-store sales, comprised of a 0.8% increase in guest check average and a 7.3% decrease in guest counts. Company restaurant sales decreased $44.0 million, or 27.4%, resulting from a 89 equivalent-unit decrease in company-owned restaurants. The decrease in equivalent
units primarily resulted from the sale of company-owned restaurants to franchisees as part of our Franchise Growth Initiative ("FGI").
Total costs of company restaurant sales as a percentage of company restaurant sales decreased to 83.7% from 86.7%. Product costs decreased to 23.1% from 24.2% due to price increases taken to help offset commodity
inflation and favorable shifts in menu mix. Payroll and benefits decreased to 38.4% from 40.8% primarily as a result of $2.3 million of favorable workers' compensation claims development. Occupancy costs increased to 6.7% from 5.9% as a result of the positive development of certain general liability claims in the prior year period, changes in the portfolio of company-owned
restaurants and the decrease in same-store sales. Other operating expenses were comprised of the following amounts and percentages of company restaurant sales:
|
Quarter Ended |
||||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Utilities |
$ |
5,868 |
5.0 |
% |
$ |
9,139 |
5.7 |
% | ||||||||
|
Repairs and maintenance |
2,496 |
2.1 |
% |
3,693 |
2.3 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Marketing |
4,493 |
3.9 |
% |
5,682 |
3.5 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Legal |
19 |
0.0 |
% |
698 |
0.4 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Other direct costs |
5,271 |
4.5 |
% |
6,172 |
3.8 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Other operating expenses |
$ |
18,147 |
15.6 |
% |
$ |
25,384 |
15.8 |
% | ||||||||
Utilities decreased by 0.7 percentage points primarily due to lower natural gas and electricity costs during the quarter ended September 30, 2009. Marketing increased by 0.4 percentage points primarily as a result of the establishment of local advertising cooperatives
during 2008 and 2009. Other direct costs increased by 0.7 percentage points primarily due to $0.4 million of business interruption income recorded in the prior year period. The overall decrease in other operating expenses primarily results from the sale of company-owned restaurants to franchisees.
Franchise Operations
Franchise and license revenue and costs of franchise and license revenue were comprised of the following amounts and percentages of franchise and license revenue for the periods indicated:
|
Quarter Ended |
||||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Royalties |
$ |
17,805 |
60.4 |
% |
$ |
17,791 |
62.1 |
% | ||||||||
|
Initial and other fees |
665 |
2.2 |
% |
1,376 |
4.8 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Occupancy revenue |
11,015 |
37.4 |
% |
9,500 |
33.1 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Franchise and license revenue |
29,485 |
100.0 |
% |
28,667 |
100.0 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Occupancy costs |
8,633 |
29.3 |
% |
7,354 |
25.6 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Other direct costs |
1,675 |
5.7 |
% |
1,403 |
4.9 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Costs of franchise and license revenue |
$ |
10,308 |
35.0 |
% |
$ |
8,757 |
30.5 |
% | ||||||||
Royalties increased by less than $0.1 million, or 0.1%, primarily resulting from a 90 equivalent unit increase in franchised and licensed units as compared to the prior year, partially offset by the effects of a 7.3% decrease in same-store sales. The increase in equivalent units resulted from the sale of company-owned restaurants to franchisees.
The decrease in initial fees of $0.7 million, or 51.7%, primarily results from the opening of nine franchise restaurants and the sale of seven restaurants to franchisees during the third quarter of 2009 as compared to the opening of eight franchise restaurants and the sale of 21 restaurants to franchisees during the third quarter of 2008. The increase in occupancy revenue of $1.5 million, or 15.9%, is primarily the result of the sale of restaurants to franchisees during 2008 and 2009.
Costs of franchise and license revenue increased by $1.6 million, or 17.7%. The increase in occupancy costs of $1.3 million, or 17.4%, is primarily the result of the sale of company-owned restaurants to franchisees. Other direct costs increased by $0.3 million, or 19.4%. Occupancy costs as a percentage of occupancy revenue are
generally higher than other direct costs as a percentage of royalties and fees. Therefore, as occupancy revenue increases as a percentage of total franchise and license revenue, the cost of franchise and license revenue as a percentage of franchise and license revenue will increase. As a result, costs of franchise and license revenue as a percentage of franchise and license revenue increased to 35.0% for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 from 30.5% for the quarter ended September 24, 2008.
Other Operating Costs and Expenses
Other operating costs and expenses such as general and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization expense relate to both company and franchise operations.
General and administrative expenses are comprised of the following:
|
Quarter Ended |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Share-based compensation |
$ |
1,197 |
$ |
849 |
||||
|
General and administrative expenses |
13,116 |
14,045 |
||||||
|
Total general and administrative expenses |
$ |
14,313 |
$ |
14,894 |
||||
15
The increase in share-based compensation expense is primarily due to the adjustment of the liability classified restricted stock units to fair value as of September 30, 2009. The $0.9 million decrease in other general and administrative expenses is primarily the result of decreased
staffing attributable to the new organizational structure implemented during the second quarter of 2008. The decrease in other general and administrative expenses is partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in expense related to our deferred compensation plan resulting from gains on the underlying assets of the plan.
Depreciation and amortization is comprised of the following:
|
Quarter Ended |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Depreciation of property and equipment |
$ |
5,872 |
$ |
7,706 |
||||
|
Amortization of capital lease assets |
659 |
871 |
||||||
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
1,334 |
1,400 |
||||||
|
Total depreciation and amortization expense |
$ |
7,865 |
$ |
9,977 |
||||
The overall decrease in depreciation and amortization expense is due primarily to the sale of company-owned restaurants to franchisees during fiscal 2008 and 2009.
Operating gains, losses and other charges, net are comprised of the following:
|
Quarter Ended |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Gains on sales of assets and other, net |
$ |
(3,127 |
) |
$ |
(5,290 |
) | ||
|
Restructuring charges and exit costs |
479 |
752 |
||||||
|
Impairment charges |
— |
244 |
||||||
|
Operating gains, losses and other charges, net |
$ |
(2,648 |
) |
$ |
(4,294 |
) | ||
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as part of our FGI, we recognized $0.6 million of gains on the sale of seven restaurant operations to four franchisees for net proceeds of $2.1 million. During the quarter ended September 24, 2008, we recognized $3.5 million of gains on the sale of 21 restaurant operations to
six franchisees for net proceeds of $8.2 million, which included a note receivable of $0.3 million. The remaining gains for the two periods resulted from the recognition of gains on the sale of other real estate assets and deferred gains.
Restructuring charges and exit costs are comprised of the following:
|
Quarter Ended |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Exit costs |
$ |
376 |
$ |
821 |
||||
|
Severance and other restructuring charges |
103 |
(69 |
) | |||||
|
Total restructuring and exit costs |
$ |
479 |
$ |
752 |
||||
There were no impairment charges for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. Impairment charges for the quarter September 24, 2008 relate to restaurants held for sale.
Operating income was $18.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared with $20.7 million for the quarter ended September 24, 2008.
Interest expense, net is comprised of the following:
|
Quarter Ended |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Interest on senior notes |
$ |
4,363 |
$ |
4,363 |
||||
|
Interest on credit facilities |
2,051 |
2,178 |
||||||
|
Interest on capital lease liabilities |
960 |
989 |
||||||
|
Letters of credit and other fees |
425 |
498 |
||||||
|
Interest income |
(464 |
) |
(232 |
) | ||||
|
Total cash interest |
7,335 |
7,796 |
||||||
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
269 |
273 |
||||||
|
Interest accretion on other liabilities |
513 |
692 |
||||||
|
Total interest expense, net |
$ |
8,117 |
$ |
8,761 |
||||
The decrease in interest expense resulted primarily from the repayment of $20.0 million and $25.9 million of term loan debt during 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Other nonoperating income, net was $0.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared with other nonoperating expense of $0.7 million for the quarter ended September 24, 2008.
The provision for income taxes was $0.8 million and $0.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and September 24, 2008, respectively. The provision for income taxes for the third quarters of 2009 and 2008 was determined using our effective rate estimated for the entire fiscal
year. The quarter ended September 24, 2008 also included the recognition of $0.6 million of current tax benefits. This item resulted from the enactment of certain federal laws that benefited us during the third quarter of 2008. We have provided valuation allowances related to any benefits from income taxes resulting from the application of a statutory tax rate to our net operating losses (“NOL”) generated in previous periods. In addition, during 2008, we utilized certain state NOL carryforwards whose
valuation allowance was established in connection with fresh start reporting on January 7, 1998. Accordingly, for the quarter ended September 24, 2008, we recognized an increase of approximately $0.1 million of federal and state deferred tax expense with a corresponding reduction to goodwill in connection with fresh start reporting. The adoption of the Codification’s guidance on business combinations during the first quarter of 2009 requires that any additional reversal of deferred tax asset valuation
allowance established in connection with fresh start reporting be recorded as a component of income tax expense rather than as a reduction to the goodwill established in connection with the fresh start reporting.
Net income was $10.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared with $10.6 million for the quarter ended September 24, 2008 due to the factors noted above.
16
Three Quarters Ended September 30, 2009 Compared with Three Quarters Ended September 24, 2008
|
Three Quarters Ended |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||
|
Company-owned restaurants, beginning of period |
315 |
394 |
||||||
|
Units opened |
1 |
3 |
||||||
|
Units sold to franchisees |
(59 |
) |
(62 |
) | ||||
|
Units closed |
(1 |
) |
(3 |
) | ||||
|
End of period |
256 |
332 |
||||||
|
Franchised and licensed restaurants, beginning of period |
1,226 |
1,152 |
||||||
|
Units opened |
29 |
19 |
||||||
|
Units purchased from Company |
59 |
62 |
||||||
|
Units closed |
(25 |
) |
(27 |
) | ||||
|
End of period |
1,289 |
1,206 |
||||||
|
Total company-owned, franchised and licensed restaurants, end of period |
1,545 |
1,538 |
||||||
Company Restaurant Operations
During the three quarters ended September 30, 2009, we realized a 2.9% decrease in same-store sales, comprised of a 1.1% increase in guest check average and a 4.0% decrease in guest counts. Company restaurant sales decreased $115.8 million, or 23.5%, resulting from a 92 equivalent-unit decrease in company-owned restaurants. The decrease
in equivalent-units primarily resulted from the sale of company-owned restaurants to franchisees as part of our FGI.
Total costs of company restaurant sales as a percentage of company restaurant sales decreased to 86.0% from 87.8%. Product costs decreased to 23.4% from 24.3% due to price increases taken to help offset
commodity inflation. Payroll and benefits decreased to 40.9% from 42.2% primarily as a result of the $2.7 million of favorable workers' compensation claims development. Additionally, these costs benefited from improved scheduling of restaurant staff. Occupancy costs
increased to 6.6% from 6.1% as a result of the negative development of certain general liability claims, changes in the portfolio of company-owned restaurants and the decrease in same-store sales. Other operating expenses were comprised
of the following amounts and percentages of company restaurant sales:
|
Three Quarters Ended |
||||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Utilities |
$ |
18,302 |
4.8 |
% |
$ |
25,484 |
5.2 |
% | ||||||||
|
Repairs and maintenance |
7,593 |
2.0 |
% |
10,959 |
2.2 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Marketing |
14,087 |
3.7 |
% |
16,911 |
3.4 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Legal |
374 |
0.1 |
% |
1,570 |
0.3 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Other direct costs |
16,383 |
4.3 |
% |
20,398 |
4.1 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Other operating expenses |
$ |
56,739 |
15.0 |
% |
$ |
75,322 |
15.3 |
% | ||||||||
Utilities decreased by 0.4 percentage points primarily due to lower natural gas and electricity costs during the three quarters ended September 30, 2009. Marketing increased by 0.3 percentage points primarily as a result of the establishment of local advertising cooperatives during 2008 and 2009. The overall decrease in other operating
expenses primarily results from the sale of company-owned restaurants to franchisees.
Franchise Operations
Franchise and license revenue and costs of franchise and license revenue were comprised of the following amounts and percentages of franchise and license revenue for the periods indicated:
|
Three Quarters Ended |
||||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Royalties |
$ |
53,690 |
59.7 |
% |
$ |
51,782 |
63.1 |
% | ||||||||
|
Initial fees |
3,571 |
4.0 |
% |
3,639 |
4.4 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Occupancy revenue |
32,721 |
36.3 |
% |
26,688 |
32.5 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Franchise and license revenue |
89,982 |
100.0 |
% |
82,109 |
100.0 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Occupancy costs |
25,241 |
28.1 |
% |
20,761 |
25.3 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Other direct costs |
7,054 |
7.8 |
% |
4,687 |
5.7 |
% | ||||||||||
|
Costs of franchise and license revenue |
$ |
32,295 |
35.9 |
% |
$ |
25,448 |
31.0 |
% | ||||||||
Royalties increased by $1.9 million, or 3.7%, primarily resulting from an 89 equivalent-unit increase in franchised and licensed units as compared to the prior year period, partially offset by the effects of a 4.5% decrease in same-store sales. The increase in equivalent-units resulted from the sale of company-owned restaurants to franchisees.
During the first three quarters of 2009 we opened 29 franchise restaurants and sold 59 restaurants to franchisees as compared to the opening of 19 franchise restaurants and the sale of 62 restaurants to franchisees during the first three quarters of 2008. Although we opened more franchise units in the 2009 period, initial fees decreased by approximately $0.1 million, or 1.9%. The decrease results from incentives included in certain franchise development agreements. The increase in occupancy revenue
of $6.0 million, or 22.6%, is also primarily the result of the sale of company-owned restaurants to franchisees.
Costs of franchise and license revenue increased by $6.8 million, or 26.9%. The increase in occupancy costs of $4.5 million, or 21.6%, is primarily the result of the sale of company-owned restaurants to franchisees. Other direct costs increased by $2.4 million, or 50.5% due primarily to $1.1
million of franchise-related costs associated with our Super Bowl promotion and $0.3 million of bad debt expense recorded during the first quarter of 2009, as well as costs related to the increased number of restaurant openings during 2009. Occupancy costs as a percentage of occupancy revenue are generally higher than other direct costs as a percentage of royalties and fees. Therefore, as occupancy revenue increases as a percentage of total franchise and license revenue, the cost of franchise
and license revenue as a percentage of franchise and license revenue will increase. As a result, costs of franchise and license revenue as a percentage of franchise and license revenue increased to 35.9% for the three quarters ended September 30, 2009 from 31.0% for the three quarters ended September 24, 2008.
Other Operating Costs and Expenses
General and administrative expenses are comprised of the following:
|
Three Quarters Ended |
||||||||
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Share-based compensation |
$ |
3,899 |
$ |
2,511 |
||||
|
General and administrative expenses |
40,168 |
43,535 |
||||||
|
Total general and administrative expenses |
$ |
44,067 |
$ |
46,046 |
||||
The increase in share-based compensation expense is primarily due to the adjustment of the liability classified restricted stock units to fair value as of September 30, 2009. The $3.4 million decrease in other general and administrative expenses is primarily the result of decreased staffing
attributable to the new organizational structure implemented during the second quarter of 2008. The decrease in other general and administrative expenses is partially offset by a $2.1 million increase in incentive compensation and a $1.6 million increase in expense related to our deferred compensation plan resulting from gains on the underlying assets of the plan.
17
Depreciation and amortization is comprised of the following:
|
Three Quarters Ended |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Depreciation of property and equipment |
$ |
18,477 |
$ |
23,247 |
||||
|
Amortization of capital lease assets |
2,054 |
2,542 |
||||||
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
4,061 |
4,321 |
||||||
|
Total depreciation and amortization expense |
$ |
24,592 |
$ |
30,110 |
||||
The overall decrease in depreciation and amortization expense is due primarily to the sale of company-owned restaurants to franchisees during fiscal 2008 and 2009.
Operating gains, losses and other charges, net are comprised of the following:
|
Three Quarters Ended |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Gains on sales of assets and other, net |
$ |
(7,159 |
) |
$ |
(18,214 |
) | ||
|
Restructuring charges and exit costs |
235 |
7,506 |
||||||
|
Impairment charges |
823 |
728 |
||||||
|
Operating gains, losses and other charges, net |
$ |
(6,101 |
) |
$ |
(9,980 |
) | ||
During the three quarters ended September 30, 2009, as part of our FGI, we recognized $3.4 million of gains on the sale of 59 restaurant operations to 14 franchisees for net proceeds of $13.9 million, which included notes receivable of $1.5 million. During the three quarters ended September 24, 2008, we recognized
$15.4 million of gains on the sale of 62 restaurant operations to 17 franchisees for net proceeds of $30.2 million, which included notes receivable of $2.7 million. The remaining gains for the two periods resulted from the recognition of gains on the sale of other real estate assets and deferred gains.
Restructuring charges and exit costs are comprised of the following:
|
Three Quarters Ended |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Exit costs |
$ |
(369 |
) |
$ |
2,476 |
|||
|
Severance and other restructuring charges |
604 |
5,030 |
||||||
|
Total restructuring and exit costs |
$ |
235 |
$ |
7,506 |
||||
The benefit in exit costs for the three quarters ended September 30, 2009 related to the favorable termination of certain leases related to closed restaurants. During the three quarters ended September 24, 2008, we recognized $5.0 million in severance and other restructuring charges related to a reorganization to support our ongoing transition
to a franchise-focused business model. The reorganization led to the elimination of approximately 50 positions.
Impairment charges for the three quarters ended September 30, 2009 and September 24, 2008 generally relate to underperforming restaurants as well as restaurants and real estate held for sale.
Operating income was $48.0 million for the three quarters ended September 30, 2009 compared with $50.5 million for the three quarters ended September 24, 2008.
Interest expense, net is comprised of the following:
|
Three Quarters Ended |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Interest on senior notes |
$ |
13,089 |
$ |
13,089 |
||||
|
Interest on credit facilities |
6,350 |
7,197 |
||||||
|
Interest on capital lease liabilities |
2,855 |
2,847 |
||||||
|
Letters of credit and other fees |
1,284 |
1,495 |
||||||
|
Interest income |
(1,294 |
) |
(732 |
) | ||||
|
Total cash interest |
22,284 |
23,896 |
||||||
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
811 |
827 |
||||||
|
Interest accretion on other liabilities |
1,752 |
2,122 |
||||||
|
Total interest expense, net |
$ |
24,847 |
$ |
26,845 |
||||
The decrease in interest expense resulted primarily from the repayment of $20.0 million and $25.9 million of term loan debt during 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Other nonoperating income, net was $1.6 million for the three quarters ended September 30, 2009 compared with other nonoperating expense of $4.4 million for the three quarters ended September 24, 2008. The nonoperating expense for the 2008 period resulted primarily from the discontinuance
of hedge accounting related to the interest rate swap.
The provision for income taxes was $1.1 million and $1.4 million for the three quarters ended September 30, 2009 and September 24, 2008, respectively. The provision for income taxes for the first three quarters of 2009 and 2008 was determined using our effective rate estimated for the
entire fiscal year. The reduction in our effective tax rate for the three quarters ended September 30, 2009 and September 24, 2008 results primarily from the recognition of $0.7 million and $0.6 million of current tax benefits in 2009 and 2008 related to the enactment of certain federal laws during the first quarter of 2009 and the third quarter of 2008, respectively. We have provided valuation allowances related to any benefits from income taxes resulting from the application of a statutory tax rate to
our net operating losses (“NOL”) generated in previous periods. In addition, during 2008, we utilized certain state NOL carryforwards whose valuation allowance was established in connection with fresh start reporting on January 7, 1998. Accordingly, for the three quarters ended September 24, 2008, we recognized a decrease of less than $0.1 million of federal and state deferred tax expense with a corresponding reduction to goodwill in connection with fresh start reporting. The adoption of
the Codification’s guidance on business combinations during the first quarter of 2009 requires that any additional reversal of deferred tax asset valuation allowance established in connection with fresh start reporting be recorded as a component of income tax expense rather than as a reduction to the goodwill established in connection with the fresh start reporting.
Net income was $23.7 million for the three quarters ended September 30, 2009 compared with $17.8 million for the three quarters ended September 24, 2008 due to the factors noted above.
18
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity and capital resources are cash generated from operations, borrowings under our Credit Facility (as defined in Note 7 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) and, in recent years, cash proceeds from the sale of surplus properties and sales of restaurant operations to franchisees, to the
extent allowed by our Credit Facility. Principal uses of cash are operating expenses, capital expenditures and debt repayments.
The following table presents a summary of our sources and uses of cash and cash equivalents for the periods indicated:
|
Three Quarters Ended |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ |
27,400 |
$ |
7,954 |
||||
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
8,246 |
10,218 |
||||||
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
(26,802 |
) |
(18,315 |
) | ||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
8,844 |
$ |
(143 |
) | |||
The increase in operating cash flows primarily resulted from a decrease in the runoff of working capital deficit following the sale of restaurant operations to franchisees. This decrease was primarily the result of the sale of a large number of restaurants to franchisees during the fourth quarter of 2007. We believe that our estimated
cash flows from operations for 2009, combined with our capacity for additional borrowings under our Credit Facility, will enable us to meet our anticipated cash requirements and fund capital expenditures over the next twelve months.
Net cash flows provided by investing activities were $8.2 million for the three quarters ended September 30, 2009. These cash flows primarily represent net proceeds of $20.7 million on sales of restaurant operations to franchisees and the sale of other real estate assets. The proceeds were partially offset by capital expenditures
of $13.9 million, of which $1.4 million was financed through capital leases. Our principal capital requirements have been largely associated with the maintenance of our existing company-owned restaurants and facilities, new construction, remodeling and our strategic initiatives, as follows:
|
Three Quarters Ended |
||||||||
|
September 30, 2009 |
September 24, 2008 |
|||||||
|
(In thousands) |
||||||||
|
Facilities |
$ |
4,745 |
$ |
7,393 |
||||
|
New construction |
3,782 |
4,567 |
||||||
|
Remodeling |
1,563 |
6,434 |
||||||
|
Strategic initiatives |
994 |
2,502 |
||||||
|
Other |
1,400 |
277 |
||||||
|
Capital expenditures |
$ |
12,484 |
$ |
21,173 |
||||
We generally expect our capital requirements to trend downward as we reduce our company-owned restaurant portfolio and remain selective in our new restaurant investments.
Cash flows used in financing activities were $26.8 million for the three quarters ended September 30, 2009, which included $19.1 million of term loan prepayments and $0.9 million of scheduled term loan payments made through a combination of asset sale proceeds, as noted above, and cash generated from operations.
Our credit facility consists of a $50 million revolving credit facility (including up to $10 million for a revolving letter of credit facility), a $106.7 million term loan and an additional $37 million letter of credit facility. At September 30, 2009, we had outstanding letters of credit of $33.4 million under our letter of credit facility.
There were no outstanding letters of credit under our revolving facility and no revolving loans outstanding at September 30, 2009. These balances result in availability of $3.6 million under our letter of credit facility and $50.0 million under the revolving facility.
The revolving facility matures on December 15, 2011. The term loan and the $37 million letter of credit facility mature on March 31, 2012. The term loan amortizes in equal quarterly installments at a rate equal to approximately 1% per annum with all remaining amounts due on the maturity date. The revolving facility is available for working
capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes. We will be required to make mandatory prepayments under certain circumstances (such as required payments related to asset sales) typical for this type of credit facility and may make certain optional prepayments under the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility is guaranteed by Denny's and its subsidiaries and is secured by substantially all of the assets of Denny's and its subsidiaries. In addition, the Credit Facility is secured by first-priority mortgages on 107 company-owned real estate assets. The Credit Facility contains certain financial covenants (i.e., maximum total debt
to EBITDA (as defined under the Credit Facility) ratio requirements, maximum senior secured debt to EBITDA ratio requirements, minimum fixed charge coverage ratio requirements and limitations on capital expenditures), negative covenants, conditions precedent, material adverse change provisions, events of default and other terms, conditions and provisions customarily found in credit agreements for facilities and transactions of this type. We were in compliance with the terms of the Credit Facility as of September
30, 2009.
As of September 30, 2009, interest on loans under the revolving facility is payable at per annum rates equal to LIBOR plus 250 basis points and will adjust over time based on our leverage ratio. Interest on the term loan and letter of credit facility is payable at per annum rates equal to LIBOR plus 200 basis points. As of September 30, 2009, the weighted-average interest rate under the term loan, exclusive of our interest rate swap on $100 million of the term loan, was 2.9%. Inclusive of our interest rate swap, the weighted-average interest rate under the term loan as of September 30, 2009 was 6.6%.
Our working capital deficit was $29.9 million at September 30, 2009 compared with $53.7 million at December 31, 2008. The decrease in working capital deficit resulted primarily from the sale of company-owned restaurants to franchisees during 2008 and 2009. We are able to operate with a substantial working capital deficit because (1) restaurant
operations and most food service operations are conducted primarily on a cash (and cash equivalent) basis with a low level of accounts receivable, (2) rapid turnover allows a limited investment in inventories, and (3) accounts payable for food, beverages and supplies usually become due after the receipt of cash from the related sales.
Implementation of New Accounting Standards
See Notes 2 and 16 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interest Rate Risk
We have exposure to interest rate risk related to certain instruments entered into for other than trading purposes. Specifically, borrowings under the term loan and revolving credit facility bear interest at variable rates based on LIBOR plus a spread of 200 basis points per annum for the term loan and letter of credit facility and 250
basis points per annum for the revolving credit facility.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $150 million to hedge a portion of the cash flows attributable to interest payments on our variable rate debt through March 30, 2010. Under the terms of the swap, through March 26, 2008, we paid a fixed rate of 4.8925% on the $150
million notional amount and received payments from the counterparties based on the 3-month LIBOR rate, effectively resulting in a fixed rate of 6.8925% on the $150 million notional amount. On March 26, 2008, we terminated $50 million of the notional amount of the interest rate swap. As of September 30, 2009, the swap effectively increases our ratio of fixed rate debt from approximately 62% of total debt to approximately 98% of total debt.
Based on the levels of borrowings under the Credit Facility at September 30, 2009, if interest rates changed by 100 basis points our annual cash flow and income before income taxes would change by less than $0.1 million. This computation is determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on the variable rate portion of
the Credit Facility at September 30, 2009. However, the nature and amount of our borrowings under the Credit Facility may vary as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors.
Our other outstanding long-term debt bears fixed rates of interest. The estimated fair value of our fixed rate long-term debt (excluding capital lease obligations and revolving credit facility advances) was approximately $178.2 million, compared with a book value of $175.2 million at September 30, 2009. This computation is based
on market quotations for the same or similar debt issues or the estimated borrowing rates available to us. Specifically, the difference between the estimated fair value of long-term debt compared with its historical cost reported in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2009 relates primarily to market quotations for our 10% Notes.
19
We also have exposure to interest rate risk related to our pension plan, other defined benefit plans and self-insurance liabilities. A 25 basis point increase or decrease in discount rate would decrease or increase our projected benefit obligation related to our pension plan by approximately $1.8 million and would impact the pension plan's net
periodic benefit cost by $0.1 million. The impact of a 25 basis point increase or decrease in discount rate would decrease or increase our projected benefit obligation related to our other defined benefit plans by less than $0.1 million and would impact the plans' net periodic benefit cost by less than $0.1 million. A 25 basis point increase or decrease in discount rate related to our self-insurance liabilities would result in a decrease or increase of $0.2 million.
Commodity Price Risk
We purchase certain food products, such as beef, poultry, pork, eggs and coffee, and utilities such as gas and electricity, which are affected by commodity pricing and are, therefore, subject to price volatility caused by weather, production problems, delivery difficulties and other factors that are outside our control and which are generally
unpredictable. Changes in commodity prices affect us and our competitors generally and often simultaneously. In general, we purchase food products and utilities based upon market prices established with vendors. Although many of the items purchased are subject to changes in commodity prices, the majority of our purchasing arrangements are structured to contain features that minimize price volatility by establishing fixed pricing and/or price ceilings and floors. We use these types of purchase arrangements to
control costs as an alternative to using financial instruments to hedge commodity prices. In many cases, we believe we will be able to address commodity cost increases which are significant and appear to be long-term in nature by adjusting our menu pricing or changing our product delivery strategy. However, competitive circumstances could limit such actions and, in those circumstances, increases in commodity prices could lower our margins. Because of the often short-term nature of commodity pricing aberrations
and our ability to change menu pricing or product delivery strategies in response to commodity price increases, we believe that the impact of commodity price risk is not significant.
We have established a policy to identify, control and manage market risks which may arise from changes in interest rates, commodity prices and other relevant rates and prices. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) our management conducted an evaluation (under the supervision and with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer, Nelson J. Marchioli, and our Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, F. Mark Wolfinger) as of the end of the period covered by this report, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, Messrs. Marchioli and Wolfinger each concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including Messrs. Marchioli and Wolfinger, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
There are various claims and pending legal actions against or indirectly involving us, including actions involving employees and guests, other employment related matters, taxes, sales of franchise rights and businesses and other matters. Based on our examination of these matters and our experience to date, we have recorded reserves reflecting
our best estimate of liability, if any, with respect to these matters. However, the ultimate disposition of these matters cannot be determined with certainty.
a. The following are included as exhibits to this report:
|
Exhibit No. |
Description | |
|
10.1 |
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 15, 2006, among Denny’s Inc. and Denny’s Realty, LLC, as Borrowers, Denny’s Corporation, Denny’s Holdings, Inc., and DFO, LLC, as Guarantors, the Lenders named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, and Banc of America
Securities LLC as Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Bookrunner | |
|
10.2 |
Amended and Restated Guarantee and Collateral Agreement dated as of December 15, 2006, among Denny’s Inc., Denny’s Realty, LLC, Denny’s Corporation, Denny’s Holdings, Inc., DFO, LLC, each other Subsidiary Loan Party referenced therein and Bank of America, N.A., as Collateral Agent | |
|
31.1 |
Certification of Nelson J. Marchioli, President and Chief Executive Officer of Denny’s Corporation, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
|
31.2 |
Certification of F. Mark Wolfinger, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Denny’s Corporation, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
|
32.1 |
Certification of Nelson J. Marchioli, President and Chief Executive Officer of Denny’s Corporation and F. Mark Wolfinger, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Denny’s Corporation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
20
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
DENNY'S CORPORATION |
|||
|
Date: October 30, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ F. Mark Wolfinger |
|
|
F. Mark Wolfinger |
|||
|
Executive Vice President,
Chief Administrative Officer and
Chief Financial Officer |
|||
|
Date: October 30, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Jay C. Gilmore |
|
|
Jay C. Gilmore |
|||
|
Vice President,
Chief Accounting Officer and
Corporate Controller |
|||
21