e10vk
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number 1-2661
CSS INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
13-1920657
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or
organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1845 Walnut Street,
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
19103
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Zip code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(215) 569-9900
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, $.10 par
value
|
|
New York Stock
Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in the definitive proxy or
information statement incorporated by reference in Part III
of this annual report on
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this annual report on
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer þ Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant is $298,672,775. Such aggregate
market value was computed by reference to the closing price of
the common stock of the registrant on the New York Stock
Exchange on September 30, 2006, being the last trading day
of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter. Such calculation excludes the shares of common stock
beneficially owned at such date by certain directors and
officers of the registrant, by the Farber Foundation and by the
Farber Family Foundation, as described under the section
entitled Ownership of CSS Common Stock in the proxy
statement to be filed by the registrant for its 2007 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders. In making such calculation, registrant
does not determine the affiliate or non-affiliate status of any
holders of the shares of common stock for any other purpose.
At May 22, 2007, there were outstanding
10,889,838 shares of common stock.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement for
its 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by
reference into Part III of this
Form 10-K.
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2007
INDEX
Part I
General
CSS Industries, Inc. (CSS or the
Company) is a consumer products company primarily
engaged in the design, manufacture, procurement, distribution
and sale of seasonal and social expression products, principally
to mass market retailers. These seasonal and all occasion
products include gift wrap, gift bags, gift boxes, boxed
greeting cards, gift tags, tissue paper, decorations, classroom
exchange Valentines, decorative ribbons and bows, Halloween
masks, costumes,
make-up and
novelties, Easter egg dyes and novelties, and craft and
educational products. CSS product breadth provides its
retail customers the opportunity to use a single vendor for much
of their seasonal product requirements. A substantial portion of
CSS products are manufactured, packaged and warehoused in
thirteen facilities located in the United States, with the
remainder purchased primarily from manufacturers in Asia and
Mexico. The Companys products are sold to its customers by
national and regional account sales managers, sales
representatives, product specialists and by a network of
independent manufacturers representatives. CSS maintains a
purchasing office in Hong Kong to administer Asian sourcing
opportunities. The Companys operating subsidiaries include
Paper Magic Group, Inc. (Paper Magic), Berwick
Offray LLC (Berwick Offray) and Cleo Inc
(Cleo). In fiscal 2007, the Company combined the
operations of its Cleo and Berwick Offray subsidiaries in order
to improve profitability and efficiency through the elimination
of redundant back office functions, certain senior management
positions, a non-core product line and excess manufacturing
capacity.
The Companys goal is to expand by developing new or
complementary products, by entering new markets, by acquiring
companies that are complementary with its existing operating
businesses and by acquiring other businesses with leading market
positions.
Principal Products CSS designs,
manufactures, distributes and sells a broad range of seasonal
consumer products primarily through the mass market distribution
channel. Christmas products include gift wrap, gift bags, gift
boxes, boxed greeting cards, gift tags, decorative tissue paper,
decorations and decorative ribbons and bows. CSS Valentine
product offerings include classroom exchange Valentine cards and
other related Valentine products, while its Easter product
offerings include
Dudleys®
brand of Easter egg dyes and related Easter seasonal products.
For Halloween, CSS offers a full line of Halloween merchandise
including
make-up,
costumes, masks and novelties. In addition to seasonal products,
CSS also designs and markets all occasion boxed greeting cards,
gift bags, tissue, decorative ribbons and bows and craft items
to its mass market, craft and floral retail and wholesale
distribution customers, and teachers aids and other
learning oriented products to the education market through the
mass market, school supply distributors and teachers
stores.
CSS operates thirteen manufacturing
and/or
distribution facilities located in Pennsylvania, Maryland,
South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas. A description of the
Companys product lines and related manufacturing
and/or
distribution facilities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Boxed greeting cards, gift tags and classroom exchange Valentine
products are either imported from Asian manufacturers or
domestically produced and warehoused in four facilities in
central and northeastern Pennsylvania. Manufacturing processes
include a wide range of finishing, assembly and packaging
operations.
|
|
|
|
Halloween
make-up and
Easter egg dye products are manufactured in Asia to specific
formulae by contract manufacturers who meet regulatory
requirements for the formularization and packaging of such
products. These products share a distribution facility in
northeastern Pennsylvania with Christmas products of the Company.
|
|
|
|
Ribbons and bows are manufactured and warehoused in seven
facilities located in northeastern Pennsylvania, Maryland, South
Carolina and Texas. The manufacturing process is vertically
integrated. Non-woven ribbon and bow products are primarily made
from polypropylene resin, a petroleum-based product, which is
mixed with color pigment, melted and pressed through an
extruder. Large rolls of extruded film go through various
combinations of manufacturing processes before being made into
bows or packaged on ribbon spools or reels as required by
various markets and customers. Woven fabric ribbons are
manufactured
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
domestically and sourced from Mexico and Asia. Domestic woven
products are either narrow woven or converted from bulk rolls of
wide width textiles.
|
|
|
|
Gift wrap is manufactured in one facility in Memphis, Tennessee.
Manufacturing includes web printing, finishing, rewinding and
packaging. Finished gift wrap products are warehoused and
shipped from both the production facility and a separate
facility in Memphis.
|
Other products, designed to the specifications of CSS, are
imported primarily from Asian manufacturers.
During our 2007 fiscal year, CSS experienced no material
difficulties in obtaining raw materials from suppliers.
Intellectual Property Rights CSS has a
number of copyrights, patents, trademarks and intellectual
property licenses which are used in connection with its
products. Substantially all of its designs and artwork are
protected by copyright. Intellectual property license rights
which CSS has obtained are viewed as especially important to the
success of its Valentine products. It is CSS view that its
operations are not dependent upon any individual patent,
trademark, copyright or intellectual property license. The
collective value of CSS intellectual property is viewed as
substantial and CSS seeks to protect its rights in all patents,
copyrights, trademarks and intellectual property licenses.
Sales and Marketing Most of CSS
products are sold in the United States and Canada by national
and regional account sales managers, sales representatives,
product specialists and by a network of independent
manufacturers representatives. CSS maintains permanent
showrooms in New York City, Memphis, Dallas, Atlanta and Hong
Kong where buyers for major retail customers will typically
visit for a presentation and review of the new lines. Products
are also displayed and presented in showrooms maintained by
various independent manufacturers representatives in major
cities in the United States and Canada. Relationships are
developed with key retail customers by CSS sales personnel and
independent manufacturers representatives. Customers are
generally mass market retailers, discount department stores,
specialty chains, warehouse clubs, drug and food chains, dollar
stores, independent card and floral shops and retail
teachers stores. Net sales to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and
its affiliates and Target Corporation accounted for
approximately 27% and 11% of total net sales, respectively,
during fiscal 2007. No other customer accounted for 10% or more
of the Companys net sales in fiscal 2007. Approximately
75% of the Companys sales are attributable to seasonal
(Christmas, Halloween, Valentines Day and Easter)
products, with the remainder attributable to everyday products.
Approximately 65% of CSS sales relate to the Christmas
season. Seasonal products are generally designed and marketed
beginning up to 18 to 20 months before the holiday event
and manufactured during an eight to ten month production cycle.
Due to these long lead time requirements, timely communication
with third party factories, retail customers and independent
manufacturers representatives is critical to the timely
production of seasonal products. Because the products themselves
are primarily seasonal, sales terms do not generally require
payment until just before or just after the holiday, in
accordance with industry practice. CSS products generally are
not sold under guaranteed or return privilege terms. All
occasion ribbon and bow products are also sold through sales
representatives or independent manufacturers
representatives to wholesale distributors and independent small
retailers who serve the floral, craft and retail packaging
trades. The Company also sells custom products to private label
customers, to other social expression companies, and to
converters of the Companys ribbon products. Custom
products are sold by both independent manufacturers
representatives and CSS sales managers.
Competition among retailers in the sale of the Companys
products to end users is intense. CSS seeks to assist retailers
in developing merchandising programs designed to enable the
retailers to meet their revenue objectives while appealing to
their consumers tastes. These objectives are met through
the development and manufacture of custom configured and
designed products and merchandising programs. CSS years of
experience in merchandising program development and product
quality are key competitive advantages in helping retailers meet
their objectives.
Competition CSS principal
competitor in Christmas products is Plus Mark, Inc. (a
subsidiary of American Greetings Corporation). Image Arts Inc.,
a subsidiary of Hallmark Cards, Inc., is also a competitor in
the boxed greeting card business. CSS competes, to a limited
extent, with other product offerings of Hallmark Cards, Inc. and
American Greetings Corporation. These competitors are larger and
have greater resources than the Company. In addition, CSS also
competes with various domestic and foreign companies in each of
its other product offerings.
2
CSS believes its products are competitively positioned in their
primary markets. Since competition is based primarily on price,
timely delivery, creative design and the ability to serve major
retail customers with single, combined product shipments for
each holiday event, CSS focus on products combined with
consistent service levels allows it to compete effectively in
its core markets.
Employees
At May 22, 2007, approximately 2,700 persons were employed
by CSS (increasing to approximately 3,300 as seasonal employees
are added).
With the exception of the bargaining units at the gift wrap
facilities in Memphis, Tennessee and the ribbon manufacturing
facility in Hagerstown, Maryland, which totaled approximately
600 employees as of May 22, 2007, CSS employees are not
represented by labor unions. Because of the seasonal nature of
certain of its businesses, the number of production employees
fluctuates during the year. The collective bargaining agreement
with the labor union representing Cleos production and
maintenance employees at the Cleo gift wrap plant and warehouses
in Memphis, Tennessee remains in effect until December 31,
2007. The collective bargaining agreement with the labor union
representing the Hagerstown-based production and maintenance
employees remains in effect until December 31, 2009.
The Company believes that relationships with its employees are
good.
SEC
Filings
The Companys Internet address is
www.cssindustries.com. On its website, the
following filings are posted as soon as reasonably practicable
after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission: its annual report on
Form 10-K,
its quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
its current reports on
Form 8-K
and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant
to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. All such filings on the Companys website are
available free of charge.
You should carefully consider each of the risk factors we
describe below, as well as other factors described in this
annual report on
Form 10-K
and elsewhere in our SEC filings.
Our
results of operations fluctuate on a seasonal basis, and quarter
to quarter comparisons may not be a good indicator of our
performance. Seasonal demand fluctuations may adversely affect
our cash flow and our ability to sell our
products.
Approximately 75% of our sales are attributable to seasonal
(Christmas, Halloween, Valentines Day and Easter)
products, with the remainder being attributable to everyday
products. Approximately 65% of our sales relate to the Christmas
season. The seasonal nature of our business results in low sales
and operating losses in our first and fourth quarters, and high
shipment levels and operating profits in our second and third
quarters. As a result, our quarterly results of operations
fluctuate during our fiscal year, and a
quarter-to-quarter
comparison is not a good indication of our performance or how we
will perform in the future. For example, our overall results of
operations in the future may fluctuate substantially based on
seasonal demand for our products. Such variations in demand
could have a material adverse effect on the timing of cash flow
and therefore our ability to meet our obligations with respect
to our debt and other financial commitments. Seasonal
fluctuations also affect our inventory levels. We must carry
significant amounts of inventory, especially before the
Christmas retail selling period. If we are not successful in
selling the inventory during the relevant period, we may have to
sell the inventory at significantly reduced prices, or we may
not be able to sell the inventory at all.
3
We
rely on a few mass market retailers, warehouse clubs and
national drug store chains for a significant portion of our
sales. The loss of sales, or a significant reduction of sales,
to one or more of our large customers may adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition. Past
and future consolidation within the retail sector also may lead
to reduced profit margins, which may adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial
condition.
A few of our customers are material to our business and
operations. Our sales to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its
affiliates and Target Corporation accounted for approximately
27% and 11% of our sales, respectively, during our 2007 fiscal
year. No other single customer accounted for 10% or more of our
sales in fiscal 2007. Our ten largest customers, which include
mass market retailers, warehouse clubs and national drug store
chains, accounted for approximately 62% of our sales in our 2007
fiscal year. Our business depends, in part, on our ability to
identify and define product and market trends, and to
anticipate, understand and react to changing consumer demands in
a timely manner. There can be no assurance that our large
customers will continue to purchase our products in the same
quantities that they have in the past. The loss of sales, or a
significant reduction of sales, to one or more of our large
customers may adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition. Further, in recent years
there has been a great amount of consolidation among our retail
customer base. As the retail sector consolidates, our customers
become larger, and command increased leverage in negotiating
prices and other terms of the sales of our products. Past and
future consolidation may lead to reduced profit margins, which
may adversely affect our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Increases
in raw material and energy costs, resulting from acts of nature,
such as hurricanes, earthquakes or influenza pandemics, or other
factors, may raise our cost of goods sold and adversely affect
our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Paper and petroleum-based materials are essential in the
manufacture of our products, and the cost of such materials is
significant to our cost of goods sold. Energy costs, especially
fuel costs, also are significant expenses in the production and
delivery of our products. Increased costs of raw materials or
energy resulting from acts of nature, such as hurricanes,
earthquakes or influenza pandemics, or other factors, may result
in declining margins and operating results if market conditions
prevent us from passing these increased costs on to our
customers through timely price increases on our products.
Risks
associated with our use of foreign suppliers may adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
For some of our product lines, particularly our Halloween,
Easter, Christmas boxed greeting cards, gift bags, gift tags and
tissue paper product lines, we use foreign suppliers to
manufacture a significant portion of our products. Approximately
40% of our sales in fiscal 2007 are related to products sourced
from foreign suppliers. Our use of foreign suppliers exposes us
to risks inherent in doing business outside of the United
States, including risks associated with foreign currency
fluctuations, transportation costs and delays, difficulties in
maintaining and monitoring quality control, compliance with
foreign laws and regulations, costs relating to the imposition
or retrospective application of duties on imported products,
economic or political instability, international public health
issues, and restrictions on the repatriation of profits and
assets.
Increased
overseas sourcing by our competitors and our customers may
reduce our market share and profit margins, adversely affecting
our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
We have relatively high market shares in many of our seasonal
product categories. Most of our product markets have shown
little or no growth in recent years, and we continue to confront
significant cost pressure as our competitors source certain
products from overseas and certain customers increase direct
sourcing from overseas factories. Increased overseas sourcing by
our competitors and certain customers may result in a reduction
of our market share and profit margins, adversely affecting our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
4
Bankruptcy
of our key customers may increase our exposure to losses from
bad debts, and may adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Many of our largest customers are mass market retailers. The
mass market retail channel in the United States has experienced
significant shifts in market share among competitors in recent
years, causing large retailers to experience liquidity problems
and file for bankruptcy protection. There is a risk that these
key customers will not pay us, or that payment may be delayed
because of bankruptcy or other factors beyond our control, which
could increase our exposure to losses from bad debts.
Additionally, our business, results of operations and financial
condition may be adversely affected if these mass market
retailers were to cease doing business as a result of
bankruptcy, or significantly reduce the number of stores they
operate.
Our
business, results of operations and financial condition may be
adversely affected by volatility in the demand for our
products.
Our success depends on the sustained demand for our products.
Many factors affect the level of consumer spending on our
products, including, among other things, general business
conditions, interest rates, the availability of consumer credit,
taxation, the effects of war, terrorism or threats of war or
terrorism, fuel prices and consumer confidence in future
economic conditions. Our business, and that of most of our
customers, may experience periodic downturns in direct relation
to downturns in the general economy. A general slowdown in the
economies in which we sell our products, or even an uncertain
economic outlook, could adversely affect consumer spending on
discretionary items, such as our products, and, in turn, could
adversely affect our sales, results of operations and financial
condition.
Our
business, results of operations and financial condition may be
adversely affected if we are unable to hire and retain
sufficient qualified personnel.
Our success depends, to a substantial extent, on the ability,
experience and performance of our senior management. Our
inability to retain our senior management team, or our inability
to attract and retain qualified replacement personnel, may
adversely affect us. We also regularly hire a large number of
seasonal employees. Any difficulty we may encounter in hiring
seasonal employees may result in significant increases in labor
costs, which may have an adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
Our
business, results of operations and financial condition may be
adversely affected if we fail to extend or renegotiate our
collective bargaining contracts with our labor unions as they
expire from time to time, or if our unionized employees were to
engage in a strike, or other work stoppage.
Approximately 600 of our employees at our ribbon manufacturing
facility in Hagerstown, Maryland and at our gift wrap facilities
in Memphis, Tennessee are represented by labor unions. The
collective bargaining agreement with the labor union
representing the Hagerstown-based production and maintenance
employees will expire on December 31, 2009. The collective
bargaining agreement with the labor union representing
Cleos production and maintenance employees at the Cleo
gift wrap plant and warehouses in Memphis, Tennessee will expire
on December 31, 2007. Although we believe our relations
with our employees are satisfactory, no assurance can be given
that we will be able to successfully extend or renegotiate our
collective bargaining agreements as they expire from time to
time. If we fail to extend or renegotiate our collective
bargaining agreements, if disputes with our unions arise, or if
our unionized workers engage in a strike or other work related
stoppage, we could incur higher ongoing labor costs or
experience a significant disruption of operations, which could
have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
Our
acquisition strategy involves risks, and difficulties in
integrating potential acquisitions may adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial
condition.
We regularly evaluate potential acquisition opportunities to
support and strengthen our business. We cannot be sure that we
will be able to locate suitable acquisition candidates, acquire
possible acquisition candidates, acquire such candidates on
commercially reasonable terms, or integrate acquired businesses
successfully. Future acquisitions may require us to incur
additional debt and contingent liabilities, which may adversely
affect our business,
5
results of operations and financial condition. The process of
integrating acquired businesses into our existing operations may
result in operating, contract and supply chain difficulties,
such as the failure to retain clients or management personnel.
Also, prior to our completion of any acquisition, we could fail
to discover liabilities of the acquired business for which we
may be responsible as a successor owner or operator in spite of
any investigation we may make prior to the acquisition. Such
difficulties may divert significant financial, operational and
managerial resources from our existing operations, and make it
more difficult to achieve our operating and strategic
objectives. The diversion of management attention, particularly
in a difficult operating environment, may adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our
inability to protect our intellectual property rights, or
infringement claims asserted against us by others, may adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
We have a number of copyrights, patents, trademarks and
intellectual property licenses which are used in connection with
our products. While our operations are not dependent upon any
individual copyright, patent, trademark or intellectual property
license, we believe that the collective value of our
intellectual property is substantial. We rely upon copyright and
trademark laws in the United States and other jurisdictions and
on confidentiality agreements with some of our employees and
others to protect our proprietary rights. If our proprietary
rights were infringed, our business could be adversely affected.
In addition, our activities could infringe upon the proprietary
rights of others, who could assert infringement claims against
us. We could face costly litigation if we are forced to defend
these claims. If we are unsuccessful in defending such claims,
our business, results of operations and financial condition
could be adversely affected.
We seek to register our trademarks in the United States and
elsewhere. These registrations could be challenged by others or
invalidated through administrative process or litigation. In
addition, our confidentiality agreements with some employees or
others may not provide adequate protection in the event of
unauthorized use or disclosure of our proprietary information,
or if our proprietary information otherwise becomes known, or is
independently developed by competitors.
Various
laws and governmental regulations applicable to a manufacturer
or distributor of consumer products may adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Our business is subject to numerous federal, state, provincial,
local and foreign laws and regulations, including laws and
regulations with respect to labor and employment, import and
export activities, taxes, chemical usage, air emissions,
wastewater and storm water discharges and the generation,
handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of
waste materials, including hazardous materials. Although we
believe that we are in substantial compliance with all
applicable laws and regulations, because legal requirements
frequently change and are subject to interpretation, we are
unable to predict the ultimate cost of compliance or the
consequences of non-compliance with these requirements, or the
effect on our operations, any of which may be significant. If we
fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we may be
subject to criminal sanctions or civil remedies, including
fines, injunctions, or prohibitions on importing or exporting.
We cannot be certain that existing laws or regulations, as
currently interpreted or reinterpreted in the future, or future
laws or regulations, will not have an adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our
business, results of operations and financial condition may be
adversely affected by national or global changes in economic or
political conditions.
Our business, results of operations and financial condition may
be adversely affected by national or global changes in economic
or political conditions, including foreign currency fluctuations
and fluctuations in inflation and interest rates, a national or
international economic downturn, and any future terrorist
attacks, and the national and global military, diplomatic and
financial exposure to such attacks or other threats.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments.
|
None.
6
The following table sets forth the location and approximate
square footage of the Companys manufacturing and
distribution facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Square Feet
|
|
Location
|
|
Use
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Elysburg, PA
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
|
253,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elysburg, PA
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
68,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danville, PA
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
133,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troy, PA
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
223,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berwick, PA
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
|
213,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berwick, PA
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berwick, PA
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berwick, PA
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
547,000
|
|
Memphis, TN
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,006,000
|
|
Memphis, TN
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,000
|
|
Hagerstown, MD
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
|
284,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hartwell, SC
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
229,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Paso, TX
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
1,849,000
|
|
|
|
2,057,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company also owns two former manufacturing facilities
aggregating 210,000 square feet which it is in the process
of selling, and utilizes owned and leased space aggregating
151,000 square feet for various marketing and
administrative purposes, including 21,000 square feet
utilized as an office and showroom in Hong Kong. The
headquarters and principal executive office of the Company are
located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
The Company is the lessee of approximately 14,000 square
feet of space (which was used in former operations), portions of
which have been subleased by the Company, as sublessor, to
various sublessees. The Company also owns a distribution
facility (approximately 135,000 square feet) which has been
leased to a third party.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
On February 17, 2004, a group of six domestic producers of
tissue paper and a labor union jointly filed an antidumping duty
petition with the International Trade Administration of the
U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce
Department) and the U.S. International Trade
Commission (ITC), in which the petitioners sought
the imposition of duties on certain tissue paper products
imported from China. The Company, as an importer from China of
certain products that were the subject of these investigations,
contested the imposition of these duties in proceedings before
the ITC and the Commerce Department.
In February 2005, the Commerce Department issued its final
determination in which it found that certain tissue paper
products are being sold into the United States from China at
less than fair value. In March 2005, the ITC issued its final
determination in which it found that an industry in the United
States is materially injured by reason of imports from China of
certain tissue paper products. As a result of these
determinations, certain tissue paper products imported from
China are now subject to the imposition of tissue duties. On
May 25, 2005, the Company filed an appeal of the ITCs
final determination which was subsequently denied on
August 31, 2006 by the United States Court of
International Trade. The Company is now contesting the final
determination of the ITC in proceedings before the United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which proceedings were
initiated by the Company on October 27, 2006.
In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, the Company
recognized an expense of approximately $2,300,000 for these
duties, reflecting the maximum liability of the Companys
Cleo subsidiary for duties relating to subject tissue paper
products imported from China during the 2005 fiscal year based
on the applicable deposit rates established by
7
the Commerce Department. The amount of Cleos actual
liability for tissue duties pertaining to the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2005, which liability is capped at the deposit
rates in effect with respect to the period of time that the
subject products were imported by Cleo, will be determined at
the time of liquidation of the applicable entries by
the United States Customs & Border Protection.
Liquidation of the applicable entries has been enjoined pending
the outcome of the Companys appeal.
With respect to the fiscal years ended March 31, 2007 and
2006, the Company believes that it did not import from China any
tissue paper products that are subject to the imposition of
tissue duties pursuant to the aforementioned final
determinations of the Commerce Department and the ITC.
CSS and its subsidiaries are also involved in ordinary, routine
legal proceedings that are not considered by management to be
material. In the opinion of Company counsel and management, the
ultimate liabilities resulting from such lawsuits and claims
will not materially affect the consolidated financial position
of the Company or its results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
|
Not applicable.
Part II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
The common stock of the Company is listed for trading on the New
York Stock Exchange. The following table sets forth the high and
low sales prices per share of that stock, and the dividends
declared per share, for each of the quarters during fiscal 2007
and fiscal 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Declared
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
32.84
|
|
|
$
|
26.60
|
|
|
$
|
.12
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
31.86
|
|
|
|
26.35
|
|
|
|
.12
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
35.77
|
|
|
|
28.46
|
|
|
|
.12
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
37.48
|
|
|
|
32.43
|
|
|
|
.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Declared
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
35.10
|
|
|
$
|
29.92
|
|
|
$
|
.12
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
37.74
|
|
|
|
35.52
|
|
|
|
.12
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
35.98
|
|
|
|
30.73
|
|
|
|
.12
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
34.00
|
|
|
|
26.00
|
|
|
|
.12
|
|
At May 22, 2007, there were approximately 2,370 holders of
the Companys common stock and there were no shares of
preferred stock outstanding.
The ability of the Company to pay any cash dividends on its
common stock is dependent on the Companys earnings and
cash requirements and is further limited by maintaining
compliance with financial covenants contained in the
Companys credit facilities. The Company anticipates that
quarterly cash dividends will continue to be paid in the future.
8
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
A total of 600 shares were repurchased at an average price
of $33.00 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. As of
March 31, 2007, there remained an outstanding authorization
to repurchase 247,424 shares of outstanding CSS common
stock as represented in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part
|
|
|
That May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
of Publicly Announced
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
|
|
Purchased(1)
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
Program(1)(2)
|
|
|
the Program(2)
|
|
|
January 1 through January 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,024
|
|
February 1 through
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,024
|
|
March 1 through
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
33.00
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
247,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
$
|
33.00
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
247,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All share repurchases were effected in open-market transactions
and in accordance with the safe harbor provisions of
Rule 10b-18
of the Securities Exchange Act. |
|
(2) |
|
The Companys Board of Directors authorized on
February 18, 1998 the repurchase of up to
1,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock (the
Repurchase Program). Thereafter, the Board of
Directors increased the number of shares authorized to be
repurchased by the Company pursuant to the Repurchase Program as
follows: November 9, 1998 (500,000 additional shares);
May 4, 1999 (500,000 additional shares); September 28,
1999 (500,000 additional shares); September 26, 2000
(500,000 additional shares); and February 27, 2003 (400,000
additional shares). As a result of the Companys
three-for-two
stock split distributed on July 10, 2003, the number of
shares authorized for repurchase pursuant to the Repurchase
Program was automatically increased to 5,100,000 shares.
The aggregate number of shares repurchased by the Company
pursuant to the Repurchase Program as of March 31, 2007 was
4,852,576 on a split-adjusted basis. An expiration date has not
been established for the Repurchase Program. |
9
Performance
Graph
The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholders
return on the Companys common stock for the period from
April 1, 2002 through March 31, 2007, with
(i) the cumulative total return on the Standard and Poors
500 (S&P 500) Index and (ii) a peer group,
as described below (assuming the investment of $100 in our
common stock, the S&P 500 Index, and the peer group on
April 1, 2002 and reinvestment of all dividends).
The peer group utilized consists of American Greetings
Corporation, Blyth, Inc., Lenox Group Inc. (f/k/a Department 56,
Inc.), Russ Berrie and Company, Inc. and Enesco Group, Inc. The
Company selected this group as its peer group because they are
engaged in businesses that are sometimes categorized with the
Companys business. However, management believes that a
comparison of the Companys performance to this peer group
will be flawed, because the businesses of the peer group
companies are in large part different from the Companys.
In this regard, the Company competes with only one division of
American Greetings, Blyth is principally focused on fragranced
candle products and related candle accessories, competing only
with some of the Companys products, and the other
companies principally sell collectible
and/or
giftware items.
10
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
530,686
|
|
|
$
|
525,494
|
|
|
$
|
536,362
|
|
|
$
|
539,349
|
|
|
$
|
532,815
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
36,804
|
|
|
|
32,716
|
|
|
|
47,118
|
|
|
|
46,297
|
|
|
|
40,010
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
|
23,889
|
|
|
|
21,841
|
|
|
|
30,692
|
|
|
|
29,850
|
|
|
|
25,846
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,813
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
23,889
|
|
|
|
21,841
|
|
|
|
30,692
|
|
|
|
29,850
|
|
|
|
17,033
|
|
Basic net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
2.25
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share
|
|
$
|
2.25
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.45
|
|
|
$
|
2.42
|
|
|
$
|
2.09
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.45
|
|
|
$
|
2.42
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
188,309
|
|
|
$
|
161,482
|
|
|
$
|
151,878
|
|
|
$
|
187,813
|
|
|
$
|
155,112
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
343,070
|
|
|
|
334,149
|
|
|
|
333,906
|
|
|
|
370,397
|
|
|
|
349,563
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
10,195
|
|
|
|
10,169
|
|
|
|
10,442
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
20,392
|
|
|
|
30,518
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
50,251
|
|
|
|
50,063
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
261,110
|
|
|
|
232,510
|
|
|
|
216,489
|
|
|
|
249,152
|
|
|
|
220,863
|
|
Cash dividends declared per
common share
|
|
$
|
.48
|
|
|
$
|
.48
|
|
|
$
|
.40
|
|
|
$
|
.307
|
|
|
$
|
.067
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle to reflect the adoption of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
Overview
Approximately 75% of the Companys sales are attributable
to seasonal (Christmas, Valentines Day, Easter and
Halloween) products, with the remainder being attributable to
everyday products. Seasonal products are sold primarily to mass
market retailers, and the Company has relatively high market
shares in many of these categories. Most of these markets have
shown little or no growth in recent years, and the Company
continues to confront significant cost pressure as its
competitors source certain products from overseas and its
customers increase direct sourcing from overseas factories.
Increasing customer concentration has augmented their bargaining
power, which has also contributed to price pressure.
The Company has taken several measures to respond to cost and
price pressures. CSS continually invests in product and
packaging design and product knowledge to assure it can continue
to provide unique added value to its customers. In addition, CSS
substantially expanded an office and showroom in Hong Kong to
better meet customers buying needs and to be able to
provide alternatively sourced products at competitive prices.
CSS continually evaluates its efficiency and productivity in its
North American production and distribution facilities and
11
in its back office operations to maintain its competitiveness
domestically. In the last four fiscal years, the Company has
closed three manufacturing plants and five warehouses totaling
800,000 square feet. Additionally, in fiscal 2007 the
Company combined the management and back office support for its
Memphis, Tennessee based Cleo gift wrap operation into its
Berwick Offray ribbon and bow subsidiary. This action enhanced
administrative efficiencies and is expected to provide
incremental penetration of gift packaging products into broader
everyday channels of distribution.
The Companys everyday craft,
trim-a-package
and stationery product lines have higher inherent growth
potential due to higher market growth rate. Further, the
Companys everyday craft,
trim-a-package,
stationery and floral product lines have higher inherent growth
potential due to CSS relatively low current market share.
The Company has established project teams to pursue top line
sales growth in these and other areas.
The seasonal nature of CSS business results in low sales
and operating losses in the first and fourth quarters and high
sales levels and operating profits in the second and third
quarters of the Companys fiscal year, thereby causing
significant fluctuations in the quarterly results of operations
of the Company.
Historically, significant growth at CSS has come through
acquisitions. Management anticipates that it will continue to
utilize acquisitions to stimulate further growth.
Litigation
As discussed in Item 3. Legal Proceedings in this annual
report on
Form 10-K,
on May 25, 2005, the Company filed an appeal of the
ITCs final determination imposing duties on certain tissue
paper products imported from China, which appeal was
subsequently denied on August 31, 2006 by the United States
Court of International Trade. The Company is now contesting the
final determination of the ITC in proceedings before the United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which
proceedings were initiated by the Company on October 27,
2006. In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, the Company
recognized an expense of approximately $2,300,000 for these
duties, reflecting the maximum liability of the Companys
Cleo subsidiary for duties relating to subject tissue paper
products imported from China during the 2005 fiscal year based
on the applicable deposit rates established by the Commerce
Department.
The amount of Cleos actual liability for tissue duties
pertaining to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, which
liability is capped at the deposit rates in effect with respect
to the period of time that the subject products were imported by
Cleo, will be determined at the time of liquidation
of the applicable entries by the United States
Customs & Border Protection. Liquidation of the
applicable entries has been enjoined pending the outcome of the
Companys appeal.
CSS and its subsidiaries are also involved in ordinary, routine
legal proceedings that are not considered by management to be
material. In the opinion of Company counsel and management, the
ultimate liabilities resulting from such lawsuits and claims
will not materially affect the consolidated financial position
of the Company or its results of operations or cash flows.
Results
of Operations
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Consolidated sales for fiscal 2007 increased 1% to $530,686,000
from $525,494,000 in fiscal 2006. The increase in sales was
primarily due to higher sales of Christmas gift wrap and boxed
greeting cards, partially offset by lower sales of tissue, gift
bags and ribbons and bows.
Cost of sales, as a percentage of sales, decreased to 74% in
2007 from 76% in 2006. The improvement in cost of sales is
primarily due to improved manufacturing and distribution
efficiencies achieved in the gift wrap, gift bag and tissue
product lines and the impact of higher sales of gift wrap and
boxed greeting cards, partially offset by incremental costs of
$706,000 associated with the restructuring program, which
includes $660,000 related to the write-down of inventory.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expenses, as a percentage of sales, increased to 18% in 2007
from 17% in 2006. The increase in SG&A expenses, as a
percentage of sales, is primarily due to incremental share-
12
based compensation expense related to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment,
increased incentive compensation expense and incremental costs
of $909,000 associated with the restructuring program
established in the current year.
Restructuring expenses were $2,327,000 in fiscal 2007 and
$37,000 in fiscal 2006. The increase in restructuring expenses
was due to the establishment of a restructuring program in the
current year to combine the operations of the Cleo and Berwick
Offray subsidiaries, to close Cleos Maysville, Kentucky
production facility and to exit a non-material, non-core
business. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements for further discussion.
Interest expense, net decreased to $2,285,000 in 2007 from
$3,279,000 in 2006. The decrease in interest expense, net was
primarily due to lower borrowing levels during fiscal 2007
compared to the prior year and increased cash balances.
Income before income taxes was $36,804,000, or 7% of sales, in
fiscal 2007 and $32,716,000, or 6% of sales, in fiscal 2006.
Excluding costs relating to the restructuring program in fiscal
2007 and including the pro forma effect of stock option expense
in the prior fiscal year for the Companys adoption of
SFAS No. 123R, income before income taxes increased
36% to $40,745,000 in fiscal 2007 from $30,031,000 in fiscal
2006.
Income taxes, as a percentage of income before taxes, were 35%
in 2007 and 33% in 2006. The increase in the effective tax rate
is primarily due to a non-recurring, one-time favorable impact
of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 of approximately
$430,000 relating to the repatriation of earnings from the
Companys foreign affiliates that was recorded in the prior
year. Also contributing to the increase is a portion of the
share-based compensation expense recorded in the current year as
a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R not being
deductible for tax purposes.
Net income for the year ended March 31, 2007 increased 9%
to $23,889,000 from $21,841,000 in 2006. Excluding costs
relating to the restructuring program in fiscal 2007 and
including the pro forma effect of stock option expense in the
prior fiscal year for the Companys adoption of
SFAS No. 123R, net income increased 35% to $26,412,000
in fiscal 2007 from $19,548,000 in fiscal 2006 and diluted
earnings per share increased 33% to $2.42 in fiscal 2007
compared to prior year diluted earnings per share of $1.82.
Fiscal
2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Consolidated sales for fiscal 2006 decreased 2% to $525,494,000
from $536,362,000 in fiscal 2005. The decline in sales was due
primarily to lower sales of Christmas gift wrap, everyday
ribbons and bows and boxed greeting cards. This sales decline
was partially offset by increased sales of seasonal tissue and
gift bags and reduced customer program expenses.
Cost of sales, as a percentage of sales, increased to 76% in
2006 from 74% in 2005. The increase in cost of sales, as a
percentage of sales, was due to a decline in the operating
performance of our gift wrap and tissue product lines. This
decline was primarily due to increased product and energy costs,
including increased fuel costs during our peak seasonal shipping
season.
SG&A expenses, as a percentage of sales, increased to 17%
in 2006 from 16% in 2005. The increase in SG&A expenses, as
a percentage of sales, was primarily due to incremental costs
related to severance associated with a workforce reduction and
recruiting and relocation costs resulting from the hiring of key
managers, partially offset by decreased incentive compensation
expense.
Restructuring expenses were $37,000 in fiscal 2006 and
$2,537,000 in fiscal 2005. The decrease in restructuring
expenses was due to limited restructuring activities occurring
in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005. During fiscal 2005, the
Company recorded restructuring expenses related to its
administrative office located in Minneapolis, Minnesota in the
amount of $1,207,000 and recorded restructuring expenses related
to the closure of its plant located in Anniston, Alabama in the
amount of $1,330,000.
Interest expense, net increased to $3,279,000 in 2006 from
$2,374,000 in 2005 primarily due to higher average borrowing
levels during the year as a result of cash expended with the
March 2005 repurchase of 1,739,760 shares of common stock
as a result of the Companys tender offer which expired on
March 4, 2005, as well as the impact of higher interest
rates.
13
Income before income taxes was $32,716,000, or 6% of sales, in
fiscal 2006 and $47,118,000, or 9% of sales, in fiscal 2005.
Income taxes, as a percentage of income before taxes, were 33%
in 2006 and 35% in 2005. The decrease in the effective tax rate
was primarily due to a one-time favorable impact of the American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004 of approximately $430,000 relating to
the repatriation of earnings from the Companys foreign
affiliates.
Net income for the year ended March 31, 2006 decreased 29%
to $21,841,000 from $30,692,000 in 2005.
Reconciliation
of Certain Non-GAAP Measures
Management believes that presentation of results of operations
adjusted for the affects of non-recurring costs related to a
restructuring program in fiscal 2007 and the pro forma impact of
recognizing stock option expense as if the Company had adopted
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, in
fiscal 2006, provides useful information to investors because it
enhances comparability between the current year and prior year
reporting periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
Income Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
$
|
36,804
|
|
|
$
|
23,889
|
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
Restructuring expenses
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
|
|
1,489
|
|
|
|
.14
|
|
Inventory write-down
due to facility closure
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
.04
|
|
Other incremental
costs related to restructuring plan
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Measurement
|
|
$
|
40,745
|
|
|
$
|
26,412
|
|
|
$
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
Income Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
$
|
32,716
|
|
|
$
|
21,841
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
Restructuring expenses
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expensing stock
options SFAS No. 123R adopted
4/1/06
|
|
|
(2,722
|
)
|
|
|
(2,318
|
)
|
|
|
(.18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Measurement
|
|
$
|
30,031
|
|
|
$
|
19,548
|
|
|
$
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share for the year ended March 31,
2007 does not add due to rounding.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At March 31, 2007, the Company had working capital of
$188,309,000 and stockholders equity of $261,110,000. The
increase in accounts receivable, net of reserves, to $37,169,000
at March 31, 2007 from $35,582,000 at March 31, 2006
was primarily the result of higher sales in the current year.
Inventories decreased from $103,770,000 to $82,138,000 primarily
due to improved inventory management. The decrease in other
current assets from $18,906,000 to $13,665,000 is primarily due
to the current year collection of an insurance claim receivable
of $4,012,000 related to water damage in a manufacturing
facility. Capital expenditures decreased to $5,289,000 in fiscal
2007 from $9,515,000 in fiscal 2006. The increase in
stockholders equity was primarily attributed to the
current year net income and capital contributed upon exercise of
employee stock options, partially offset by payments of cash
dividends.
The Companys Board of Directors previously authorized a
buyback of the Companys common stock pursuant to prices
and other terms and conditions that the Companys officers
may deem appropriate. Any such buy back is subject to compliance
with regulatory requirements and relevant covenants of the
Companys credit facilities. As of March 31, 2007, the
Company has 247,424 shares remaining available for
repurchase under the
14
Boards authorization. The Company repurchased
9,800 shares for $323,000 and 218,100 shares for
$7,167,000 in fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006, respectively.
The Company relies primarily on cash generated from its
operations and seasonal borrowings to meet its liquidity
requirements. Historically, a significant portion of CSS
revenues are seasonal with approximately 80% of sales recognized
in the second and third quarters. As payment for sales of
Christmas related products is usually not received until just
before or just after the holiday selling season in accordance
with general industry practice, short-term borrowing needs
increase throughout the second and third quarters, peaking prior
to Christmas and dropping thereafter. Seasonal financing
requirements were met under a $50,000,000 revolving credit
facility with five banks and an accounts receivable
securitization facility with an issuer of receivables-backed
commercial paper. This facility has a funding limit of
$100,000,000 during peak seasonal periods and $25,000,000 during
off-peak seasonal periods. In addition, the Company has
outstanding $30,000,000 of 4.48% senior notes due ratably in
annual $10,000,000 installments through December 2009. These
financing facilities are available to fund the Companys
seasonal borrowing needs and to provide the Company with sources
of capital for general corporate purposes, including
acquisitions as permitted under the revolving credit facility.
At March 31, 2007, there were no borrowings outstanding
under the revolving credit facility and there were long-term
borrowings of $30,000,000 related to the senior notes. For
information concerning these credit facilities, see Note 8
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Based on its current operating plan, the Company believes its
sources of available capital are adequate to meet its ongoing
cash needs for at least the next 12 months.
As of March 31, 2007, the Companys contractual
obligations and commitments are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
7,244
|
|
|
|
10,920
|
|
|
|
3,667
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
23,142
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
|
11,210
|
|
|
|
21,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,285
|
|
Other long-term obligations(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
2,610
|
|
|
|
3,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,673
|
|
|
$
|
32,762
|
|
|
$
|
3,921
|
|
|
$
|
3,921
|
|
|
$
|
59,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest on long-term debt is based on amounts outstanding and
on the fixed interest rate of 4.48%. |
|
(2) |
|
Other long-term obligations consist primarily of postretirement
medical liabilities and deferred compensation arrangements.
Future timing of payments for other long-term obligations is
estimated by management. |
As of March 31, 2007, the Companys other commitments
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
$
|
3,883
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,883
|
|
The Company has a letter of credit that guarantees the funding
of workers compensation claims. The Company has no financial
guarantees or other arrangements with any third parties or
related parties other than its subsidiaries.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into
arrangements with vendors to purchase merchandise in advance of
expected delivery. These purchase orders do not contain any
significant termination payments or other penalties if canceled.
Critical
Accounting Policies
In preparing our consolidated financial statements, management
is required to make estimates and assumptions that, among other
things, affect the reported amounts of assets, revenue and
expenses. These estimates and assumptions are most significant
where they involve levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary
to account for highly uncertain matters or matters susceptible
to change, and where they can have a material impact on our
15
financial condition and operating performance. Below are the
most significant estimates and related assumptions used in the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements. If actual
results were to differ materially from the estimates made, the
reported results could be materially affected.
Revenue
Revenue is recognized from product sales when goods are shipped,
title and risk of loss have been transferred to the customer and
collection is reasonably assured. The Company records estimated
reductions to revenue for customer programs, which may include
special pricing agreements for specific customers, volume
incentives and other promotions. The Company also records
estimated reductions to revenue, based primarily on historical
experience, for customer returns and chargebacks that may arise
as a result of shipping errors, product damaged in transit or
for other reasons that become known subsequent to recognizing
the revenue. These provisions are recorded in the period that
the related sale is recognized and are reflected as a reduction
from gross sales and the related reserves are shown as a
reduction of accounts receivable, except reserves for customer
programs which are shown as a current liability. If the amount
of actual customer returns and chargebacks were to increase or
decrease significantly from the estimated amount, revisions to
the estimated allowance would be required.
Accounts
Receivable
The Company offers seasonal dating programs related to certain
seasonal product offerings pursuant to which customers that
qualify for such programs are offered extended payment terms.
Customers generally do not have the right to return product
except for reasons the Company believes are typical of our
industry, including damaged goods, shipping errors or similar
occurrences. With few exceptions, the Company is not required to
repurchase products from its customers, nor does the Company
have any regular practice of doing so. In addition, the Company
mitigates its exposure to bad debts by evaluating the
creditworthiness of its major customers utilizing established
credit limits and purchasing credit insurance when appropriate
and available. Bad debt and returns and allowances reserves are
recorded as an offset to accounts receivable while reserves for
customer programs are recorded as accrued liabilities. The
Company evaluates accounts receivable related reserves and
accruals monthly by specifically reviewing customers
creditworthiness, historical recovery percentages and
outstanding customer program arrangements.
Inventory
Valuation
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is
primarily determined by the
first-in,
first-out method although certain inventories are valued based
on the
last-in,
first-out method. The Company writes down its inventory for
estimated obsolescence in an amount equal to the difference
between the cost of the inventory and the estimated market value
based upon assumptions about future demand, market conditions,
customer planograms and sales forecasts. Additional inventory
write downs could result from unanticipated additional carryover
of finished goods and raw materials, or from lower proceeds
offered by parties in our traditional closeout channels.
Goodwill
Goodwill is subject to an assessment for impairment using a
two-step fair value-based test, the first step of which must be
performed at least annually, or more frequently if events or
circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. The
first step compares the fair value of a reporting unit to its
carrying amount, including goodwill. For each of the reporting
units, the estimated fair value is determined utilizing a
multiple of earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation
and amortization. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit
exceeds its fair value, the second step is performed. The second
step compares the carrying amount of the goodwill to the implied
fair value of the goodwill. If the implied fair value of
goodwill is less than the carrying amount of the goodwill, an
impairment loss would be reported.
Accounting
for Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial
statements, we are required to estimate our actual current tax
expense (state, federal and foreign), including the impact of
permanent and temporary differences
16
resulting from differing bases and treatment of items for tax
and accounting purposes, such as the carrying value of
intangibles, deductibility of expenses, depreciation of
property, plant and equipment, and valuation of inventories.
Temporary differences and operating loss and credit
carryforwards result in deferred tax assets and liabilities,
which are included within our consolidated balance sheets. We
must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets
will be recovered from future taxable income. Actual results
could differ from this assessment if sufficient taxable income
is not generated in future periods. To the extent we determine
the need to establish a valuation allowance or increase such
allowance in a period, we would record additional tax expense in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The
management of the Company periodically estimates the probable
tax obligations of the Company using historical experience in
tax jurisdictions and informed judgments. There are inherent
uncertainties related to the interpretation of tax regulations.
The judgments and estimates made at a point in time may change
based on the outcome of tax audits, as well as changes to or
further interpretations of regulations. If such changes take
place, there is a risk that the tax rate may increase or
decrease in any period.
Share-Based
Compensation
Effective April 1, 2006, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123R, using the modified prospective
transition method and began accounting for its share-based
compensation using a fair-value based recognition method. Under
the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, share-based
compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the
fair value of the award and is expensed ratably over the
requisite service period of the award. Determining the
appropriate fair-value model and calculating the fair value of
share-based awards at the grant date requires considerable
judgment, including estimating stock price volatility, and the
expected option life.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to
value employee stock awards. The Company estimates stock price
volatility based on historical volatility of its common stock.
Estimated option life assumptions are also derived from
historical data. The Company recognizes compensation expense
using the straight-line amortization method for share-based
compensation awards with graded vesting. Had the Company used
alternative valuation methodologies and assumptions,
compensation cost for share-based payments could be
significantly different.
Accounting
Pronouncements
See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
information concerning recent accounting pronouncements and the
impact of those standards.
Forward-Looking
and Cautionary Statements
This report includes forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995, including statements regarding the Companys
expectation that it will sell facilities held for sale within
the next 12 months for an amount greater than the current
carrying value; improved profitability and efficiency from the
Companys restructuring program to combine the operations
of its Cleo and Berwick Offray subsidiaries; estimated future
expenses in connection with such restructuring program;
continued use of acquisitions to stimulate further growth; the
Companys expected ultimate liabilities from lawsuits and
claims; the expected future impact of changes in accounting
principles; and the anticipated effects of measures taken by the
Company to respond to cost and price pressures. Forward-looking
statements are based on the beliefs of the Companys
management as well as assumptions made by and information
currently available to the Companys management as to
future events and financial performance with respect to the
Companys operations. Forward-looking statements speak only
as of the date made. The Company undertakes no obligation to
update any forward-looking statements to reflect the events or
circumstances arising after the date as of which they were made.
Actual events or results may differ materially from those
discussed in forward-looking statements as a result of various
factors, including without limitation, general market
conditions, increased competition, increased operating costs,
including labor-related and energy costs and costs relating to
the imposition or retrospective application of duties on
imported products, currency risks and other risks associated
with international markets, risks associated with the
combination of the operations of the Companys Cleo and
Berwick Offray subsidiaries, including restructuring costs and
the risk that such costs may exceed the expected amounts
described herein, the risk that customers may become insolvent,
costs of compliance with governmental regulations and government
investigations, liability
17
associated with non-compliance with governmental regulations,
including regulations pertaining to the environment, Federal and
state employment laws, and import and export controls and
customs laws, and other factors described more fully elsewhere
in this annual report on
Form 10-K
and in the Companys previous filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. As a result of these factors, readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking
statements included herein or that may be made elsewhere from
time to time by, or on behalf of, the Company.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
The Companys activities expose it to a variety of market
risks, including the effects of changes in interest rates and
foreign currency exchange rates. These financial exposures are
actively monitored and, where considered appropriate, managed by
the Company as described below.
Interest
Rate Risk
The Companys primary market risk exposure with regard to
financial instruments is to changes in interest rates. Pursuant
to the Companys variable rate lines of credit, a change in
either the lenders base rate or LIBOR would affect the
rate at which the Company could borrow funds thereunder. Based
on average borrowings under these credit facilities of
$28,547,000 for the year ended March 31, 2007, a 1%
increase or decrease in floating interest rates would have
increased or decreased annual interest expense by approximately
$285,000. Based on an average cash balance of $32,872,000 for
the year ended March 31, 2007, a 1% increase or decrease in
interest rates would have increased or decreased annual interest
income by approximately $329,000.
Foreign
Currency Risk
Approximately 4% of the Companys sales in fiscal 2007 were
denominated in a foreign currency. The Company considers its
risk exposure with regard to foreign currency fluctuations
insignificant as it enters into foreign currency forward
contracts to hedge the majority of firmly committed transactions
and related receivables that are denominated in a foreign
currency. The Company has designated its foreign currency
forward contracts as fair value hedges. The gains or losses on
the fair value hedges are recognized in earnings and generally
offset the transaction gains or losses on the foreign
denominated assets that they are intended to hedge.
18
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
25-40
|
|
Financial Statement Schedules:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
19
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
CSS Industries, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
CSS Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2007
and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations
and comprehensive income, cash flows and stockholders
equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended
March 31, 2007. In connection with our audits of the
consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the
financial statement schedule, Schedule II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. These consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of CSS Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
March 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended March 31, 2007, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Notes 1 and 5 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective April 1, 2006, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective transition
method.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of CSS Industries, Inc.s internal control
over financial reporting as of March 31, 2007, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated
June 1, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of, and the effective operation of,
internal control over financial reporting.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
June 1, 2007
20
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
100,091
|
|
|
$
|
57,656
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of
allowances of $4,850 and $4,119
|
|
|
37,169
|
|
|
|
35,582
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
82,138
|
|
|
|
103,770
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
8,645
|
|
|
|
7,898
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
13,665
|
|
|
|
18,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
244,272
|
|
|
|
223,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
2,739
|
|
|
|
3,033
|
|
Buildings, leasehold interests and
improvements
|
|
|
55,352
|
|
|
|
56,469
|
|
Machinery, equipment and other
|
|
|
124,164
|
|
|
|
123,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,255
|
|
|
|
183,483
|
|
Less Accumulated
depreciation
|
|
|
(123,358
|
)
|
|
|
(112,615
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
58,897
|
|
|
|
70,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
30,952
|
|
|
|
30,952
|
|
Intangible assets, net of
accumulated amortization of $619 and $525
|
|
|
4,328
|
|
|
|
4,422
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,621
|
|
|
|
4,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
39,901
|
|
|
|
39,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
343,070
|
|
|
$
|
334,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
10,195
|
|
|
|
10,169
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
12,212
|
|
|
|
14,494
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
3,910
|
|
Accrued payroll and other
compensation
|
|
|
12,816
|
|
|
|
11,420
|
|
Accrued customer programs
|
|
|
10,290
|
|
|
|
10,791
|
|
Accrued other expenses
|
|
|
10,006
|
|
|
|
11,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
55,963
|
|
|
|
62,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, NET OF CURRENT
PORTION
|
|
|
20,392
|
|
|
|
30,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
3,221
|
|
|
|
3,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
2,384
|
|
|
|
5,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(Notes 9 and 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, Class 2, $.01
par, 1,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.10 par,
25,000,000 shares authorized, 14,703,084 shares issued
at March 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
40,680
|
|
|
|
36,033
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
325,246
|
|
|
|
313,879
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss, net of tax
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Common stock in treasury, 3,857,571
and 4,216,584 shares, at cost
|
|
|
(106,285
|
)
|
|
|
(118,870
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
261,110
|
|
|
|
232,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
343,070
|
|
|
$
|
334,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
21
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
NET SALES
|
|
$
|
530,686
|
|
|
$
|
525,494
|
|
|
$
|
536,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
394,045
|
|
|
|
399,605
|
|
|
|
397,538
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
96,125
|
|
|
|
90,211
|
|
|
|
87,460
|
|
Restructuring expenses
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
Interest expense, net of interest
income of $1,295, $474, and $530
|
|
|
2,285
|
|
|
|
3,279
|
|
|
|
2,374
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(900
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493,882
|
|
|
|
492,778
|
|
|
|
489,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
36,804
|
|
|
|
32,716
|
|
|
|
47,118
|
|
INCOME TAX PROVISION
|
|
|
12,915
|
|
|
|
10,875
|
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
23,889
|
|
|
$
|
21,841
|
|
|
$
|
30,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.25
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
23,889
|
|
|
$
|
21,841
|
|
|
$
|
30,692
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
23,890
|
|
|
$
|
21,841
|
|
|
$
|
30,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
22
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
23,889
|
|
|
$
|
21,841
|
|
|
$
|
30,692
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,335
|
|
|
|
14,499
|
|
|
|
14,294
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax (benefit) provision
|
|
|
(3,621
|
)
|
|
|
(1,512
|
)
|
|
|
667
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale or disposal of
assets
|
|
|
(418
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
Compensation expense related to
stock options
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts
receivable
|
|
|
(1,613
|
)
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
|
2,544
|
|
Decrease (increase) in inventories
|
|
|
21,632
|
|
|
|
(1,903
|
)
|
|
|
(7,409
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
(4,778
|
)
|
|
|
(959
|
)
|
Decrease in accounts payable
|
|
|
(2,282
|
)
|
|
|
(843
|
)
|
|
|
(1,546
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in accrued
income taxes
|
|
|
(3,466
|
)
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
Decrease in accrued expenses and
other long-term obligations
|
|
|
(957
|
)
|
|
|
(4,510
|
)
|
|
|
(3,301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
55,347
|
|
|
|
27,600
|
|
|
|
38,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
(5,289
|
)
|
|
|
(9,515
|
)
|
|
|
(8,477
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing
activities
|
|
|
(4,557
|
)
|
|
|
(9,154
|
)
|
|
|
(8,080
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt
obligations
|
|
|
(10,241
|
)
|
|
|
(10,484
|
)
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
Borrowings on notes payable
|
|
|
172,360
|
|
|
|
243,845
|
|
|
|
143,465
|
|
Payments on notes payable
|
|
|
(172,360
|
)
|
|
|
(243,845
|
)
|
|
|
(143,465
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(5,100
|
)
|
|
|
(5,040
|
)
|
|
|
(4,789
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
(7,167
|
)
|
|
|
(69,004
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
5,486
|
|
|
|
4,568
|
|
|
|
7,845
|
|
Tax benefit realized for stock
options exercised
|
|
|
1,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing
activities
|
|
|
(8,356
|
)
|
|
|
(18,123
|
)
|
|
|
(66,092
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
42,435
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
(35,858
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
57,656
|
|
|
|
57,333
|
|
|
|
93,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end
of period
|
|
$
|
100,091
|
|
|
$
|
57,656
|
|
|
$
|
57,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash
flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
3,780
|
|
|
$
|
3,971
|
|
|
$
|
2,933
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
17,874
|
|
|
$
|
9,579
|
|
|
$
|
13,096
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
23
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
in Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
BALANCE, APRIL 1, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
14,703,084
|
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
|
$
|
31,619
|
|
|
$
|
282,351
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
(2,872,749
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66,288
|
)
|
|
$
|
249,152
|
|
Tax benefit associated with
exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,430
|
|
Compensation expense related to
stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon
exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532,929
|
|
|
|
13,077
|
|
|
|
7,845
|
|
Increase in treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,981,560
|
)
|
|
|
(69,004
|
)
|
|
|
(69,004
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Cash dividends ($.40 per
common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,789
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,789
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,703,084
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
34,214
|
|
|
|
303,022
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4,321,380
|
)
|
|
|
(122,215
|
)
|
|
|
216,489
|
|
Tax benefit associated with
exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
Compensation expense related to
stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon
exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,944
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,896
|
|
|
|
10,512
|
|
|
|
4,568
|
|
Increase in treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(218,100
|
)
|
|
|
(7,167
|
)
|
|
|
(7,167
|
)
|
Cash dividends ($.48 per
common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,040
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,040
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,703,084
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
36,033
|
|
|
|
313,879
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4,216,584
|
)
|
|
|
(118,870
|
)
|
|
|
232,510
|
|
Tax benefit associated with
exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,822
|
|
Compensation expense related to
stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon
exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,422
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368,813
|
|
|
|
12,908
|
|
|
|
5,486
|
|
Increase in treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,800
|
)
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash dividends ($.48 per
common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,100
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
14,703,084
|
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
|
$
|
40,680
|
|
|
$
|
325,246
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3,857,571
|
)
|
|
$
|
(106,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
261,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
24
MARCH 31, 2007
(1) SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
CSS Industries, Inc. (CSS or the
Company) and all of its subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Foreign
Currency Translation and Transactions
Translation adjustments are charged or credited to a separate
component of stockholders equity. Gains and losses on
foreign currency transactions are not material and are included
in other income, net in the consolidated statements of
operations.
Nature
of Business
CSS is a consumer products company primarily engaged in the
design, manufacture, procurement, distribution and sale of
seasonal and social expression products, principally to mass
market retailers. These seasonal and all occasion products
include gift wrap, gift bags, gift boxes, boxed greeting cards,
gift tags, tissue paper, decorations, classroom exchange
Valentines, decorative ribbons and bows, Halloween masks,
costumes,
make-up and
novelties, Easter egg dyes and novelties, and craft and
educational products. CSS product breadth provides its
retail customers the opportunity to use a single vendor for much
of their seasonal product requirements. A substantial portion of
CSS products are manufactured, packaged and warehoused in
thirteen facilities located in the United States, with the
remainder purchased primarily from manufacturers in Asia and
Mexico. The Companys products are sold to its customers by
national and regional account sales managers, sales
representatives, product specialists and by a network of
independent manufacturers representatives.
The Companys operating subsidiaries include Paper Magic
Group, Inc. (Paper Magic), Berwick Offray LLC
(Berwick Offray) and Cleo Inc (Cleo). In
fiscal 2007, the Company combined the operations of its Cleo and
Berwick Offray subsidiaries in order to improve profitability
and efficiency through the elimination of redundant back office
functions, certain senior management positions, a non-core
product line and excess manufacturing capacity. Approximately
600 of its 2,700 employees (increasing to approximately 3,300 as
seasonal employees are added) are represented by labor unions.
The collective bargaining agreement with the labor union
representing the production and maintenance employees in
Memphis, Tennessee remains in effect until December 31,
2007. The collective bargaining agreement with the labor union
representing the production and maintenance employees in
Hagerstown, Maryland remains in effect until December 31,
2009.
Reclassification
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform
with the current year classification.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Judgments and
assessments of uncertainties are required in applying the
Companys accounting policies in many areas. Such estimates
pertain to the valuation of inventory and accounts receivable,
the assessment of the recoverability of goodwill and other
intangible assets, income tax accounting, the valuation of
share-based awards and resolution of litigation and other
proceedings. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
25
Inventories
The Company records inventory at the date of taking title, which
occurs upon receipt or prior to receipt dependent on supplier
shipping terms. The Company adjusts unsalable and slow-moving
inventory to its estimated net realizable value. Substantially
all of the Companys inventories are stated at the lower of
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) cost or market. The remaining portion of the
inventory is valued at the lower of
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) cost or market, which was $955,000 and
$2,065,000 at March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Had
all inventories been valued at the lower of FIFO cost or market,
inventories would have been greater by $818,000 and $911,000 at
March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Inventories
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Raw material
|
|
$
|
14,442
|
|
|
$
|
22,881
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
31,283
|
|
|
|
35,741
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
36,413
|
|
|
|
45,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
82,138
|
|
|
$
|
103,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
Held for Sale
Assets held for sale in the amount of $2,564,000 represents two
former manufacturing facilities which the Company is in the
process of selling. The Company expects to sell these facilities
within the next 12 months for an amount greater than the
current carrying value. The Company ceased depreciating these
facilities at the time they were classified as held for sale.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation
is provided generally on the straight-line method and is based
on estimated useful lives or terms of leases as follows:
|
|
|
Buildings, leasehold interests and
improvements
|
|
Lease term to 45 years
|
Machinery, equipment and other
|
|
3 to 12 years
|
When property is retired or otherwise disposed of, the related
cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization are
eliminated from the consolidated balance sheet. Any gain or loss
from the disposition of property, plant and equipment is
included in other income, net. Maintenance and repairs are
expensed as incurred while improvements are capitalized and
depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Depreciation
expense was $14,101,000, $14,264,000 and $14,009,000 for the
years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, except for goodwill and indefinite lived
intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment when
circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be
recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is
measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to
future net cash flows estimated by the Company to be generated
by such assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired,
the impairment to be recognized is the amount by which the
carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the
assets. Assets to be disposed of are recorded at the lower of
their carrying value or estimated net realizable value.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
When a company is acquired, the difference between the fair
value of its net assets, including intangibles, and the purchase
price is recorded as goodwill. In the fourth quarter of fiscal
2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company performed the required annual
impairment test of the carrying amount of goodwill and
indefinite lived assets and determined that no impairment
existed. Other intangible assets with definite useful lives are
required to continue to be amortized over their respective
estimated useful lives.
26
At March 31, 2007, in addition to goodwill, the Company had
$4,290,000 of other intangible assets relating to trade names
that are not subject to amortization and $38,000 of other
intangible assets, which is net of accumulated amortization of
$619,000, relating primarily to a covenant not to compete, that
is being amortized over five years (see Note 2).
Derivative
Financial Instruments
The Company uses certain derivative financial instruments as
part of its risk management strategy to reduce interest rate and
foreign currency risk. Derivatives are not used for trading or
speculative activities.
The Company recognizes all derivatives on the consolidated
balance sheet at fair value. On the date the derivative
instrument is entered into, the Company generally designates the
derivative as either (1) a hedge of the fair value of a
recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm
commitment (fair value hedge), or (2) a hedge
of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows
to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or
liability (cash flow hedge). Changes in the fair
value of a derivative that is designated as, and meets all the
required criteria for, a fair value hedge, along with the gain
or loss on the hedged asset or liability that is attributable to
the hedged risk, are recorded in current period earnings.
Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is designated as,
and meets all the required criteria for, a cash flow hedge are
recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and
reclassified into earnings as the underlying hedged item affects
earnings. The portion of the change in fair value of a
derivative associated with hedge ineffectiveness or the
component of a derivative instrument excluded from the
assessment of hedge effectiveness is recorded currently in
earnings. Also, changes in the entire fair value of a derivative
that is not designated as a hedge are recorded immediately in
earnings. The Company formally documents all relationships
between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its
risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various
hedge transactions. This process includes relating all
derivatives that are designated as fair value or cash flow
hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the consolidated
balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted
transactions.
The Company also formally assesses, both at the inception of the
hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether each derivative is highly
effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of
the hedged item. If it is determined that a derivative is not
highly effective as a hedge or if a derivative ceases to be a
highly effective hedge, the Company will discontinue hedge
accounting prospectively.
The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts in
order to reduce the impact of certain foreign currency
fluctuations. Firmly committed transactions and the related
receivables and payables may be hedged with forward exchange
contracts. Gains and losses arising from foreign currency
forward contracts are recognized in income or expense as offsets
of gains and losses resulting from the underlying hedged
transactions. The notional amount of open forward exchange
contracts as of March 31, 2007 was $294,000 and the related
gain was not material. The notional amount of open forward
exchange contracts as of March 31, 2006 was $494,000 and
the related loss was not material.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss
and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences
and carryforwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The
effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue from product sales when the goods
are shipped, title and risk of loss have been transferred to the
customer and collection is reasonably assured. Provisions for
returns, allowances, rebates to customers and other adjustments
are provided in the same period that the related sales are
recorded.
27
Product
Development Costs
Product development costs consist of purchases of outside
artwork, printing plates, cylinders, catalogs and samples. The
Company typically begins to incur product development costs
approximately 18 to 20 months before the applicable holiday
event and amortizes the costs monthly over the selling season,
which is generally within two to four months of the holiday
event. The expense of certain product development costs that are
related to the manufacturing process are recorded in cost of
sales while the portion that relates to creative and selling
efforts are recorded in selling, general and administrative
expenses.
Product development costs capitalized as of March 31, 2007
and 2006 were $5,647,000 and $5,689,000, respectively, and are
included in other current assets in the consolidated financial
statements. Product development expense of $7,887,000,
$7,384,000 and $6,759,000 was recognized in the years ended
March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Shipping
and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are reported in cost of sales in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective April 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective
transition method, and began accounting for its share-based
compensation using a fair-value based recognition method. Under
the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, share-based
compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on a
fair-value model. Calculating the fair value of share-based
awards at the grant date requires considerable judgment,
including estimating stock price volatility and expected option
life.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to
value employee stock awards. The Company estimates stock price
volatility based on historical volatility of its common stock.
Estimated option life assumptions are also derived from
historical data. The Company recognizes compensation expense
using the straight-line amortization method for share-based
compensation awards with graded vesting. Had the Company used
alternative valuation methodologies and assumptions,
compensation cost for share-based payments could be
significantly different.
Net
Income Per Common Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic net
income per common share and diluted net income per common share
for the years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
23,889
|
|
|
$
|
21,841
|
|
|
$
|
30,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding for basic income per common share
|
|
|
10,622
|
|
|
|
10,482
|
|
|
|
11,886
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted average shares
outstanding for diluted income per common share
|
|
|
10,919
|
|
|
|
10,935
|
|
|
|
12,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share
|
|
$
|
2.25
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Options on 58,000 shares, 643,000 shares and
23,000 shares of common stock were not included in
computing diluted net income per common share for the years
ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, because
their effects were antidilutive.
Statements
of Cash Flows
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the
Company considers all holdings of highly liquid debt instruments
with a maturity at time of purchase of three months or less to
be cash equivalents.
(2) GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets are
subject to fair-value based impairment tests performed, at a
minimum, on an annual basis. The Company performs its annual
assessment of impairment in the fourth fiscal quarter. These
impairment tests are conducted on each reporting unit of the
Company, and may require two steps. For goodwill, the initial
step is designed to identify potential impairment by comparing
an estimate of the fair value for each applicable reporting unit
to its respective carrying value. For those reporting units
where the carrying value exceeds its fair value, a second step
is performed to measure the amount of goodwill impairment, if
any. With respect to indefinite lived intangible assets, the
impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of the
intangible to its carrying value. In the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company performed the required
annual impairment test of the carrying amount of goodwill and
indefinite lived intangible assets and determined that no
impairment existed.
The carrying amount of goodwill was $30,952,000 at
March 31, 2007. In addition to goodwill, the Company has
$4,290,000 of other intangible assets relating to trade names
that are not subject to amortization and $38,000 of other
intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $619,000,
relating primarily to a covenant not to compete that is being
amortized over five years. Accumulated amortization at
March 31, 2007 and 2006 was $619,000 and $525,000
respectively, and amortization expense was $94,000 for fiscal
2007, $94,000 for fiscal 2006 and $151,000 for fiscal 2005. The
aggregate estimated amortization expense for intangible assets
remaining as of March 31, 2007 is $38,000 in fiscal 2008.
(3) BUSINESS
RESTRUCTURING
On November 27, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company
approved a restructuring plan to combine the operations of its
Cleo and Berwick Offray subsidiaries, to close Cleos
Maysville, Kentucky production facility and to exit a
non-material, non-core business. This restructuring was
undertaken in order to improve profitability and efficiency
through the elimination of redundant back office functions,
certain senior management positions and excess manufacturing
capacity. The Company expects to complete the restructuring plan
by September 30, 2007. As part of the restructuring plan,
the Company recorded a restructuring reserve of $1,323,000,
including severance related to 29 employees. Also, in connection
with the restructuring plan, the Company recorded an impairment
of property, plant and equipment at the affected facilities of
$422,000, which is included in restructuring expenses.
Additionally, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, there
was an increase in the restructuring reserve in the amount of
$582,000 primarily related to the ratable recognition of
retention bonuses for employees providing service until their
termination date. During the year ended March 31, 2007, the
Company made payments of $449,000, primarily related to
severance. As of March 31, 2007, the remaining liability of
$1,456,000 was classified as a current liability in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet and will be paid in
fiscal 2008. The Company expects to incur additional charges
related to other restructuring costs of approximately $250,000
during fiscal 2008.
Selected information relating to the aforementioned
restructuring follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Initial accrual
|
|
$
|
1,200
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
1,323
|
|
Additional charges
fiscal 2007
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
Cash paid fiscal 2007
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring reserve as of
March 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
1,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
On November 1, 2004, a subsidiary of the Company announced
the anticipated closure of its plant located in Anniston,
Alabama. As of the end of fiscal 2005, the Company had
communicated termination of employment to 89 employees.
Manufacturing operations were moved to other locations of the
Company and this project was substantially completed by June
2005. As part of this restructuring plan, the Company accrued
$206,000 for severance costs during fiscal 2005. During fiscal
2005, the Company increased the restructuring reserve by
$1,124,000, primarily related to facility exit costs and medical
benefits for employees providing service until their termination
date. All payments for termination costs and facility exit costs
were made by the end of fiscal 2006.
On May 5, 2004, a subsidiary of the Company announced a
restructuring of its business and established a restructuring
reserve related to its administrative office located in
Minneapolis, Minnesota. This restructuring was undertaken in
order to gain efficiencies within the business unit and was
substantially completed by the first quarter of fiscal 2006. As
part of this restructuring plan, the Company accrued $377,000
for termination costs and costs related to the restructuring of
the administrative office. As of the end of fiscal 2005, the
Company had communicated termination of employment to 33
employees. In fiscal 2005, the Company increased the
restructuring reserve in the amount of $255,000 related to the
ratable recognition of retention bonuses for employees providing
service until their termination date. Additionally, during
fiscal 2005, there was an increase in the restructuring reserve
in the amount of $177,000 related to unutilized office space and
of $398,000 related to other restructuring expenses. The Company
increased the restructuring reserve by $37,000 during fiscal
2006 primarily related to the ratable recognition of retention
bonuses for employees providing service until their termination.
Final payments for termination costs of $4,000 were made in the
first quarter of fiscal 2007.
(4) TREASURY
STOCK TRANSACTIONS
The Companys Board of Directors previously authorized a
buyback of the Companys common stock at prices and
pursuant to other terms and conditions that the Companys
officers may deem appropriate. Any such buy back is subject to
compliance with regulatory requirements and relevant covenants
of the Companys credit facilities. As of March 31,
2007, the Company has 247,424 shares remaining available
for repurchase under the Boards authorization. The Company
repurchased 9,800 shares for $323,000 in fiscal 2007,
218,100 shares for $7,167,000 in fiscal 2006, and
1,981,560 shares for $69,004,000 in fiscal 2005.
(5) STOCK
OPTION PLANS
Under the terms of the 2004 Equity Compensation Plan (2004
Plan), the Human Resources Committee
(Committee) of the Board of Directors may grant
incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted
stock grants, stock appreciation rights, stock bonuses and other
awards to officers and other employees. Grants under the 2004
Plan may be made through August 3, 2014. The term of each
grant is at the discretion of the Committee, but in no event
greater than ten years from the date of grant. The Committee has
discretion to determine the date or dates on which granted
options become exercisable. All options outstanding as of
March 31, 2007 become exercisable at the rate of 25% per
year commencing one year after the date of grant. At
March 31, 2007, options to acquire 1,350,175 shares
were available for grant under the 2004 Plan.
Under the terms of the CSS Industries, Inc. 2006 Stock Option
Plan for Non-Employee Directors (2006 Plan),
non-qualified stock options to purchase up to
200,000 shares of common stock are available for grant to
non-employee directors at exercise prices of not less than the
fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of
grant. Under the 2006 Plan, options to purchase
4,000 shares of the Companys common stock are granted
automatically to each non-employee director on the last day that
the Companys common stock is traded in November from 2006
to 2010. Each option will expire five years after the date the
option is granted and commencing one year after the date of
grant, options begin vesting and are excisable at the rate of
25% per year. At March 31, 2007, options to acquire
180,000 shares were available for grant under the 2006 Plan.
Prior to April 1, 2006, the Company accounted for its
equity incentive plans under the recognition and measurement
provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related Interpretations, as permitted by
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. Effective April 1, 2006, the Company
adopted the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, using
the modified prospective transition method. Under that
transition method, stock
30
compensation cost recognized in fiscal 2007 includes:
(a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted
prior to, but not vested as of April 1, 2006, based on the
grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original
provisions of SFAS No. 123, (b) compensation cost
for all share-based payments granted subsequent to April 1,
2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance
with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, and
(c) compensation cost for all share-based payments
modified, repurchased, or cancelled subsequent to April 1,
2006. Compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis
over the vesting period during which employees perform related
services. In accordance with the modified prospective transition
method, the consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2006
and fiscal 2005 have not been restated to reflect the impact of
SFAS No. 123R.
The Company issues treasury shares for stock option exercises.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company
presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from
share-based payment arrangements as operating cash flows in the
consolidated statements of cash flows. SFAS No. 123R
requires that the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits
from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost
recognized for those share awards (referred to as excess tax
benefits) be classified as financing cash flows. The $1,822,000
excess tax benefit classified as a financing cash inflow for the
year ended March 31, 2007 would have been classified as an
operating cash inflow if the Company had not adopted
SFAS No. 123R.
Compensation cost related to stock options recognized in
operating results (included in selling, general and
administrative expenses) was $2,825,000 and the associated
future income tax benefit recognized was $666,000 in the year
ended March 31, 2007. For the year ended March 31,
2007, basic and diluted income per share was $.20 lower than if
the Company had continued to account for share-based
compensation under APB Opinion No. 25.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net
income per share if the Company had applied the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to options
granted under the Companys stock option plans for the
years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net income, as reported
|
|
$
|
21,841
|
|
|
$
|
30,692
|
|
Add: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense included in the determination of net
income, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair-value based method
for all awards, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
(2,429
|
)
|
|
|
(2,505
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$
|
19,523
|
|
|
$
|
28,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$
|
1.86
|
|
|
$
|
2.39
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.45
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$
|
1.82
|
|
|
$
|
2.30
|
|
Upon exercise of stock options, the Company issues shares from
treasury stock. Expected volatilities are based on historical
volatility of the Companys common stock. The expected life
of the option is estimated using historical data pertaining to
option exercises and employee terminations. The risk-free
interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury yields in effect at
the time of grant.
The fair value of each stock option granted was estimated on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with
the following average assumptions:
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield at time of
grant
|
|
|
1.60
|
%
|
|
|
1.44
|
%
|
|
|
1.23
|
%
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.91
|
%
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
|
|
3.76
|
%
|
Expected life of option (in years)
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Transactions from April 1, 2004 through March 31, 2007
under the above plans (and their predecessor plans) were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Option Price
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average Life
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Options outstanding at
April 1, 2004
|
|
|
2,102,986
|
|
|
$
|
12.71 - 31.25
|
|
|
$
|
17.92
|
|
|
|
6.4 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
361,000
|
|
|
|
29.70 - 35.00
|
|
|
|
33.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(580,920
|
)
|
|
|
13.09 - 23.83
|
|
|
|
16.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/canceled
|
|
|
(36,050
|
)
|
|
|
14.33 - 34.12
|
|
|
|
25.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
1,847,016
|
|
|
|
12.71 - 35.00
|
|
|
|
21.35
|
|
|
|
5.5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
362,100
|
|
|
|
29.66 - 36.60
|
|
|
|
33.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(394,733
|
)
|
|
|
12.71 - 34.12
|
|
|
|
17.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/canceled
|
|
|
(76,777
|
)
|
|
|
16.70 - 34.12
|
|
|
|
29.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,737,606
|
|
|
|
12.71 - 36.60
|
|
|
|
24.35
|
|
|
|
4.7 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
399,100
|
|
|
|
27.60 - 36.10
|
|
|
|
30.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(451,600
|
)
|
|
|
12.71 - 35.00
|
|
|
|
17.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/canceled
|
|
|
(176,996
|
)
|
|
|
16.70 - 35.00
|
|
|
|
32.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,508,110
|
|
|
$
|
12.71 - 36.60
|
|
|
$
|
26.94
|
|
|
|
3.9 years
|
|
|
$
|
15,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
758,064
|
|
|
$
|
12.71 - 36.60
|
|
|
$
|
22.65
|
|
|
|
3.9 years
|
|
|
$
|
11,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average fair value of options granted during fiscal
2007, 2006 and 2005 was $7.87, $9.78 and $11.78 per share,
respectively.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the year
ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $6,639,000,
$6,051,000 and $10,405,000, respectively. As of March 31,
2007, there was $5,437,000 of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to non-vested stock option awards granted under the
Companys equity incentive plans which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.3 years.
(6) RETIREMENT
BENEFIT PLANS
Profit
Sharing Plans
The Company and its subsidiaries maintain defined contribution
profit sharing and 401(k) plans covering substantially all of
their employees as of March 31, 2007. Annual contributions
under the plans are determined by the Board of Directors of the
Company or each subsidiary, as appropriate. Consolidated expense
related to the plans for the years ended March 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005 was $2,710,000, $2,112,000 and $2,475,000,
respectively.
Pension
Plan
The Companys Cleo subsidiary administered a defined
benefit pension plan covering substantially all salaried
employees of Crystal Creative Products, Inc.
(Crystal) at the time of Cleos acquisition of
Crystal in October 2002. The plan was frozen on November 2,
2002 and terminated September 30, 2003. After the plan was
frozen, benefits were provided to eligible employees by allowing
them to participate in an existing defined contribution
32
profit sharing and 401(k) plan. In the first quarter of fiscal
2006, the Company received the Internal Revenue Service approval
letter regarding termination of the plan. As of March 31,
2006, the Company made all payments and purchased annuities in
accordance with the provisions of the plan. During fiscal 2006,
the Company recorded a charge of $72,000 related to the
incremental cost of annuities that were purchased in fiscal
2006. During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company
transferred the surplus in the defined benefit plan of
$3,156,000 to a separate investment account which will be used
to fund future contributions to the existing defined
contribution profit sharing and 401(k) plan. As of
March 31, 2007, $1,795,000 of the surplus was classified in
other current assets and the long-term portion of $883,000 was
classified in other assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet.
The Company used a March 31 measurement date for its
pension plan. The following provides a reconciliation of the
benefit obligation and plan assets as of March 31, 2007 and
2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
3,156
|
|
|
$
|
4,313
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Benefits paid from plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,268
|
)
|
Transfer to investment account to
fund future contributions to the defined contribution profit
sharing and 401(k) plan
|
|
|
(3,156
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end
of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of
year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Actuarial loss and other
adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status/prepaid benefit cost
recognized in the consolidated balance sheet
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumptions used to develop the net periodic benefit costs
of the defined benefit pension plan were a discount rate of 5%
and an expected return on plan assets of 3.3% for the year ended
March 31, 2006.
The expected rate of return on plan assets was developed
considering historical returns and the future expectations for
returns for each asset class, weighted by the target asset
allocations. The pension plans weighted average asset
allocation at March 31, 2006 was 100% in guaranteed
investment contracts.
Postretirement
Medical Plan
The Companys Cleo subsidiary administers a postretirement
medical plan covering certain persons who were employees or
former employees of Crystal at the time of Cleos
acquisition of Crystal in October 2002. The plan is unfunded and
was frozen to new participants prior to Crystals
acquisition by the Company.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the benefit
obligation for postretirement medical plan (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of
year
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain) and other
adjustments
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
106
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation recognized in
the consolidated balance sheet
|
|
$
|
825
|
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
The assumptions used to develop the net periodic benefit cost
and benefit obligation for the postretirement medical plan as of
and for the years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were
a discount rate of 6% and assumed health care cost trend rates
of 16% (17% for 2006 and 18% for 2005) trending down to an
ultimate rate of 6% in 2017. Assumed health care cost trend
rates can have a significant effect on the amounts reported for
the postretirement medical plan. A one percentage point change
in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following
effects (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Percentage
|
|
|
1 Percentage
|
|
|
|
Point Increase
|
|
|
Point Decrease
|
|
|
Effect on total of service and
interest cost
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
Effect on postretirement benefit
obligation
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
Net periodic pension and postretirement medical costs include
the following components (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition of net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit cost
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) INCOME
TAXES
Income from operations before income tax expense was as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
20,957
|
|
|
$
|
22,684
|
|
|
$
|
31,866
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
15,847
|
|
|
|
10,032
|
|
|
|
15,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,804
|
|
|
$
|
32,716
|
|
|
$
|
47,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the provision for
U.S. federal, state and foreign taxes on income
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
12,679
|
|
|
$
|
9,967
|
|
|
$
|
12,550
|
|
State
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
2,958
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
2,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,536
|
|
|
|
12,387
|
|
|
|
15,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(3,172
|
)
|
|
|
(1,738
|
)
|
|
|
298
|
|
State
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,621
|
)
|
|
|
(1,512
|
)
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,915
|
|
|
$
|
10,875
|
|
|
$
|
16,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
The differences between the statutory and effective federal
income tax rates on income before income taxes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
U.S. federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, less federal
benefit
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Changes in tax reserves and
valuation allowance
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(.8
|
)
|
Foreign dividend repatriation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.1
|
%
|
|
|
33.2
|
%
|
|
|
34.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options
reduced current taxes payable and increased additional paid-in
capital by $1,822,000 in fiscal 2007, $1,647,000 in fiscal 2006
and $2,430,000 in fiscal 2005.
Deferred taxes are recorded based upon differences between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and
available net operating loss and credit carryforwards. The
following temporary differences gave rise to net deferred income
tax assets (liabilities) as of March 31, 2007 and 2006 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
259
|
|
|
$
|
410
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
4,138
|
|
|
|
4,821
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
5,750
|
|
|
|
4,277
|
|
State net operating loss and
credit carryforwards
|
|
|
11,672
|
|
|
|
9,384
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,485
|
|
|
|
19,153
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(11,543
|
)
|
|
|
(9,384
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,942
|
|
|
|
9,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
4,641
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unremitted earnings of foreign
subsidiaries
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,948
|
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,681
|
|
|
|
7,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax asset
|
|
$
|
6,261
|
|
|
$
|
2,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had potential state
income tax benefits of $11,672,000 and $9,384,000, respectively,
from net operating loss and credit carryforwards that expire in
various years through 2022. At March 31, 2007 and 2006, the
Company provided valuation allowances of $11,543,000 and
$9,384,000, respectively. The valuation allowance reflects
managements assessment of the portion of the deferred tax
asset that more likely than not will not be realized through
future taxable earnings or implementation of tax planning
strategies.
Due to developments during fiscal 2007, the Company decreased
its state income tax reserves by $305,000 and its state and
foreign valuation allowances by $290,000.
35
On October 22, 2004 the U.S. Government passed the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act). The
Act provided for a limited time 85% dividends received deduction
on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a
U.S. taxpayer, provided certain criteria are met. In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Staff Position
No. 109-2,
Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign
Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004 (FSP
No. 109-2).
FSP
No. 109-2
provides accounting and disclosure guidance for the repatriation
provision. On February 21, 2006, the Board of Directors
approved a domestic reinvestment plan in compliance with the
Act. In accordance with the domestic reinvestment plan,
approximately $9,200,000 in foreign earnings were repatriated in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 and received the favorable tax
treatment provided by the Act. The Company recorded a one-time
tax benefit of approximately $430,000, which is reflected in the
Companys fiscal 2006 effective tax rate, and is a result
of the reduction of the net deferred tax liability associated
with these repatriated earnings.
(8) LONG-TERM
DEBT AND CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
4.48% Senior Notes due
December 13, 2009
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,587
|
|
|
|
40,687
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(10,195
|
)
|
|
|
(10,169
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,392
|
|
|
$
|
30,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On December 13, 2002, the Company issued $50,000,000 of
4.48% Senior Notes due December 13, 2009 (the
Senior Notes). The Senior Notes are to be paid
ratably over five years, beginning at the end of the third year
of the seven year term of the agreement. The note purchase
agreement contains various financial covenants, the most
restrictive of which pertain to net worth, the ratio of
operating cash flow to fixed charges and the ratio of debt to
capitalization. The Company is in compliance with all covenants
as of March 31, 2007.
On April 23, 2004, the Companys expiring $100,000,000
revolving credit facility was replaced with a $50,000,000
unsecured revolving credit facility with five banks. This
facility expires on April 23, 2009. The loan agreement
contains provisions to increase or reduce the interest pricing
spread based on the achievement of certain benchmarks related to
the ratio of earnings to interest expense. At the Companys
option, interest on the facility accrues at (1) the greater
of the prime rate minus 0.5% or the Federal Funds Rate, or
(2) LIBOR plus .75%. The revolving credit facility provides
for commitment fees of 0.225% per annum on the daily
average of the unused commitment. The loan agreement also
contains various financial covenants, the most restrictive of
which pertain to net worth, the ratio of operating cash flow to
fixed charges, the ratio of debt to capitalization and
limitations on capital expenditures. The Company is in
compliance with all financial debt covenants as of
March 31, 2007.
On April 23, 2004, the Company entered into an extension of
its accounts receivable securitization facility through
July 25, 2009, although the facility is subject to earlier
termination in the event of termination of the commitments of
the facilitys
back-up
purchasers. The agreement permits the sale (and repurchase) of
an undivided interest in an accounts receivable pool. The
facility has a funding limit of $100,000,000 during peak
seasonal periods and $25,000,000 during off-peak seasonal
periods. Under this arrangement, the Company sells, on an
ongoing basis and without recourse, its trade accounts
receivable to a wholly-owned special purpose subsidiary (the
SPS), which in turn has the option to sell, on an
ongoing basis and without recourse, to a commercial paper issuer
an undivided percentage interest in the pool of accounts
receivable. Under the agreement, new trade receivables are
automatically sold to the SPS and became a part of the
receivables pool. Interest on amounts financed under this
facility are based on a variable commercial paper rate plus
0.375% and commitment fees of 0.225% per annum on the daily
average of the unused commitment are also payable under the
facility. This arrangement is accounted for as a financing
transaction.
36
The weighted average interest rate under the revolving credit
facilities for the years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005, was 7.04%, 5.24% and 3.89%, respectively. The average and
peak borrowings were $28,547,000 and $79,800,000, respectively,
for the year ended March 31, 2007 and $33,436,000 and
$91,400,000, respectively, for the year ended March 31,
2006. Additionally, outstanding letters of credit under the
revolving credit facilities totaled $3,883,000 and $3,948,000 at
March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The Companys
letters of credit guarantee funding of workers compensation
claims as well as obligations to certain vendors.
The Company leases certain computer equipment under a capital
lease. The future minimum annual lease payments, including
interest, associated with the capital lease obligations are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
2009
|
|
|
226
|
|
2010
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease obligations
|
|
|
629
|
|
Less amount representing interest
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of future minimum
lease obligations
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including capital lease obligations, matures as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
10,195
|
|
2009
|
|
|
10,212
|
|
2010
|
|
|
10,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
30,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9) OPERATING
LEASES
The Company maintains various lease arrangements for property
and equipment. The future minimum rental payments associated
with all noncancelable lease obligations are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
7,244
|
|
2009
|
|
|
6,118
|
|
2010
|
|
|
4,802
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,925
|
|
2012
|
|
|
742
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
23,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense was $8,507,000, $9,044,000 and $9,723,000 for the
years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
(10) FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The estimated fair value of financial instruments has been
determined by the Company using available market information and
appropriate methodologies. The estimates presented herein are
not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could
realize in a current market exchange. Certain of these financial
instruments are with major financial institutions and expose the
Company to market and credit risks and may at times be
concentrated with certain counterparties or groups of
counterparties. The creditworthiness of counterparties is
continually reviewed, and full performance is anticipated.
The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of each class of
financial instruments are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts
payable The carrying amounts of these items are
a reasonable estimate of their fair values at March 31,
2007 and 2006.
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings Borrowings under the
revolving credit facility have variable rates that reflect
currently available terms and conditions for similar debt. The
carrying amount of this debt is a reasonable estimate of its
fair value.
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts The fair value is
based on quotes obtained from financial institutions. The fair
value of foreign currency contracts was immaterial as of
March 31, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt The fair value of long-term
debt instruments is estimated using a discounted cash flow
analysis. As of March 31, 2007, the carrying amount of
long-term debt was $30,587,000 and the fair value was estimated
to be $29,995,000. As of March 31, 2006, the carrying
amount of long-term debt was $40,687,000 and the fair value was
estimated to be $40,218,000.
|
(11) COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
On August 31, 2006, the United States Court of
International Trade (CIT) denied the Companys
appeal challenging the imposition of antidumping duties on
certain tissue paper products imported from China. In the
proceedings before the CIT, the Company was seeking reversal of
the March 2005 final determination of the United States
International Trade Commission (ITC) that, in part,
resulted in the imposition of such duties. The Company is now
contesting the final determination of the ITC in proceedings
before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit, which proceedings were initiated by the Company on
October 27, 2006.
In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, the Company
recognized an expense of approximately $2,300,000 for these
duties, reflecting the maximum liability of the Companys
Cleo subsidiary for duties relating to subject tissue paper
products imported from China during the 2005 fiscal year, based
on the applicable deposit rates established by the
U.S. Commerce Department. The amount of Cleos actual
liability for tissue duties pertaining to the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2005, which liability is capped at the deposit
rates in effect with respect to the period of time that the
subject products were imported by Cleo, will be determined at
the time of liquidation of the applicable entries by
the United States Customs & Border Protection.
Liquidation of the applicable entries has been enjoined pending
the outcome of the Companys appeal.
CSS and its subsidiaries are also involved in ordinary, routine
legal proceedings that are not considered by management to be
material. In the opinion of Company counsel and management, the
ultimate liabilities resulting from such lawsuits and claims
will not materially affect the consolidated financial position
of the Company or its results of operations or cash flows.
(12) SEGMENT
DISCLOSURE
The Company operates in a single reporting segment, the
manufacture, distribution and sale of non-durable seasonal
consumer goods, primarily to mass market retailers in the United
States and Canada.
The Companys detail of revenues from its various products
is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Christmas
|
|
$
|
346,866
|
|
|
$
|
323,380
|
|
|
$
|
329,540
|
|
All occasion
|
|
|
127,163
|
|
|
|
143,307
|
|
|
|
145,486
|
|
Other seasonal
|
|
|
56,657
|
|
|
|
58,807
|
|
|
|
61,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
530,686
|
|
|
$
|
525,494
|
|
|
$
|
536,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One customer accounted for sales of $144,464,000, or 27.2% of
total sales in fiscal 2007, $144,202,000, or 27.4% of total
sales in fiscal 2006 and $138,232,000, or 25.8% of total sales
in fiscal 2005. One other customer accounted for sales of
$58,742,000, or 11.1% of total sales in fiscal 2007,
$60,751,000, or 11.6% of total sales in fiscal 2006 and
$57,593,000, or 10.7% of total sales in fiscal 2005.
(13) RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs, which amends the guidance in
Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4,
Inventory Pricing to clarify the accounting for
abnormal
38
amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and
spoilage. SFAS No. 151 now requires that these costs
be expensed as current period charges. In addition, this
statement requires that the allocation of fixed production
overhead to the costs of conversion be based on the normal
capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of this
statement were effective for the Company beginning April 1,
2006. The adoption of this statement did not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.
SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to
prior periods financial statements for voluntary changes
in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine
either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of
the change. This statement also requires that retrospective
application of a change in accounting principle be limited to
the direct effects of the change. Indirect effects of a change
in accounting principle, such as a change in non-discretionary
profit-sharing payments resulting from an accounting change,
should be recognized in the period of the accounting change.
SFAS No. 154 also requires that a change in
depreciation, amortization or depletion method for long-lived
non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting
estimate effected by a change in accounting principle. The
provisions of this statement were effective for the Company
beginning April 1, 2006. The Companys consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows will
only be impacted by SFAS No. 154 if it implements
changes in accounting principles that are addressed by the
standard or corrects accounting errors in future periods.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No.
(FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. The interpretation requires that the Company
recognize in its consolidated financial statements the impact of
a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of
being sustained on audit, based solely on the technical merits
of the position. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods and disclosure. The provisions of
FIN 48 will be effective for the Company beginning
April 1, 2007 with the cumulative effect (if any) of the
change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to
opening retained earnings. The Company does not believe the
adoption of FIN 48 will have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when
Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements. SAB No. 108 requires that public
companies utilize a dual-approach to assessing the
quantitative effects of financial misstatements. This dual
approach includes both a statement of operations focused
assessment and a balance sheet focused assessment.
SAB No. 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after
November 15, 2006. The Company adopted
SAB No. 108 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. The
adoption of SAB No. 108 had no impact on the
Companys consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States, and expands disclosure about such fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007 (fiscal 2009 for
the Company). The Company is currently assessing the impact of
SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated financial position
and results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits companies to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other
items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial
reporting by providing companies with the opportunity to
mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring
related assets and liabilities differently without having to
apply complex hedge accounting provisions.
SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. Companies are not allowed to adopt
SFAS No. 159 on a retrospective basis unless they
choose early adoption. The Company intends to adopt
SFAS No. 159 at the beginning of fiscal 2009 and is
currently assessing the impact, if any, SFAS No. 159
will have on its consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
39
(14) QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters
|
|
2007
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
47,533
|
|
|
$
|
173,830
|
|
|
$
|
264,065
|
|
|
$
|
45,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
13,470
|
|
|
$
|
44,827
|
|
|
$
|
66,370
|
|
|
$
|
11,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(5,507
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,703
|
|
|
$
|
23,290
|
|
|
$
|
(5,597
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(1)
|
|
$
|
(.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
(.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
$
|
(.52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters
|
|
2006
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
57,494
|
|
|
$
|
164,043
|
|
|
$
|
251,796
|
|
|
$
|
52,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
14,729
|
|
|
$
|
38,367
|
|
|
$
|
62,429
|
|
|
$
|
10,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,655
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,239
|
|
|
$
|
23,924
|
|
|
$
|
(7,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(1)
|
|
$
|
(.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
.88
|
|
|
$
|
2.27
|
|
|
$
|
(.73
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
(.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
.84
|
|
|
$
|
2.18
|
|
|
$
|
(.73
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net (loss) income per common share amounts for each quarter are
required to be computed independently and may not equal the
amount computed for the total year. |
The seasonal nature of CSS business has historically
resulted in comparatively lower sales and operating losses in
the first and fourth quarters and comparatively higher sales
levels and operating profits in the second and third quarters of
the Companys fiscal year, thereby causing significant
fluctuations in the quarterly results of operations of the
Company.
40
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
|
None
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
(a) Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
The Companys management, with the participation of the
Companys President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice
President Finance and Chief Financial Officer,
evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (Exchange Act)
Rules 13a-15(e)
or
15d-15(e))
as of the end of the period covered by this report as required
by paragraph (b) of Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15
or 15d-15.
Based upon that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive
Officer and Vice President Finance and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed by the
Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and procedures.
(b) Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting of the
Company. Internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
The Companys internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
Companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting based on the framework
in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that
the Companys internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of March 31, 2007. Managements
assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2007 has
been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included
herein.
(c) Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
There was no change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of
fiscal year 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
41
(d) Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
CSS Industries, Inc.:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting, that CSS Industries, Inc. maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
March 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
CSS Industries, Inc.s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that CSS
Industries, Inc. maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of March 31, 2007, is fairly stated,
in all material respects, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Also, in our opinion, CSS Industries, Inc. maintained,
in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of March 31, 2007, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of CSS Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income,
cash flows and stockholders equity for each of the years
in the three-year period ended March 31, 2007, and our
report dated June 1, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion
on those consolidated financial statements.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
June 1, 2007
42
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information.
|
None
Part III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
|
See Election of Directors, Our Executive
Officers, Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance, Code of Ethics and Internal
Disclosure Procedures (Employees) and Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics (Board), Board Committees; Committee
Membership; Committee Meetings and Audit
Committee in the Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, which is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation.
|
See Executive Compensation, Human Resources
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,
Director Compensation and Human Resources
Committee Report in the Proxy Statement for the 2007
Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters.
|
See Ownership of CSS Common Stock and
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under CSS Equity
Compensation Plans in the Proxy Statement for the 2007
Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
|
See Board Independence and Related Party
Transactions in the Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, which is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services.
|
See Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,
Their Fees and Their Attendance at the Annual Meeting in
the Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
of the Company, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Part IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a) Following is a list of documents filed as part of this
report:
1. Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets March 31,
2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Income for the years ended March 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years
ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
for the years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying
Accounts
3. Exhibits required by Item 601 of
Regulation S-K,
Including Those Incorporated by Reference
43
Articles
of Incorporation and By-Laws
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation filed December 5, 1990 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amendment to Restated Certificate
of Incorporation filed May 8, 1992 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006).
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate eliminating
Class 2, Series A, $1.35 Preferred stock filed
September 27, 1991 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006).
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Certificate eliminating
Class 1, Series B, Convertible Preferred Stock filed
January 28, 1993 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006).
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
By-laws of the Company, as amended
to date (as last amended January 15, 2004) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004).
|
|
3
|
.6
|
|
Amendment to Restated Certificate
of Incorporation filed August 4, 2004 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated November 8, 2004).
|
|
3
|
.7
|
|
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, as amended to date (as last amended
August 4, 2004) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated November 8, 2004).
|
Material
Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated
February 8, 2002, among Berwick Industries LLC, Daylight
Acquisition Corp., Lion Ribbon Company, Inc., C. M.
Offray & Son, Inc., CVO Corporation (Delaware), C.M.
Offray & Son (Hong Kong) Limited, Claude V.
Offray, Jr., Claude V. Offray III, and Denise A.
Offray (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated March 15, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Asset
Purchase Agreement dated March 15, 2002 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated March 15, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Receivables Purchase Agreement
among CSS Funding LLC, CSS Industries, Inc., Market Street
Funding Corporation and PNC Bank, National Association, dated as
of April 30, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement
between Various Entities Listed on Schedule I, as the
Originators, CSS Industries, Inc. and CSS Funding LLC, dated as
of April 30, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.10 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
First Amendment to Receivables
Purchase Agreement dated as of August 24, 2001
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
First Amendment to Purchase and
Sale Agreement dated as of August 24, 2001 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
$50,000,000 4.48% Senior
Notes due December 13, 2009 Note Purchase Agreement dated
December 12, 2002 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Amended and Restated Loan
Agreement dated April 23, 2004 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
dated November 8, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Second Amendment to Purchase and
Sale Agreement dated as of July 29, 2003 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated November 8, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Third Amendment to Purchase and
Sale Agreement dated June 1, 2004 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated November 8, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Second Amendment to Receivables
Purchase Agreement dated as of July 29, 2003 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated November 8, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Third Amendment to Receivables
Purchase Agreement dated as of April 26, 2004 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated November 8, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Receivables
Purchase Agreement dated June 1, 2004 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated November 8, 2004).
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
First Amendment to Note Purchase
Agreements dated October 27, 2004 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated November 8, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated
Loan Agreement dated January 27, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005).
|
Management
Contracts, Compensatory Plans or Arrangements
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. 1995 Stock
Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996).
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. 2000 Stock
Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. Non-Qualified
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Guidelines, dated
January 25, 1994 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Amendment 1998-1 to the
Non-Qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Covering
Officer-Employees of CSS Industries, Inc., dated
November 13, 1998 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Berwick Industries, Inc.
Non-Qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated
November 18, 1996 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.26 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996).
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Amendment 1998-1 to the
Non-Qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Covering
Officer-Employees of Berwick Industries, Inc. and its
Subsidiaries in the United States, dated November 18, 1998
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
The Paper Magic Group, Inc.
Non-Qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated
December 5, 1996 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.27 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996).
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Amendment 1998-1 to the
Non-Qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Covering
Officer-Employees of The Paper Magic Group, Inc. and its
Subsidiaries in the United States, dated November 23, 1998
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Cleo Inc Non-Qualified
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan dated November 26,
1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Amendment 1998-1 to the
Non-Qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Covering
Officer-Employees of Cleo Inc and its Subsidiaries in the United
States, dated November 23, 1998 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.26 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. 1994 Equity
Compensation Plan (as last amended August 7, 2002)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. 2004 Equity
Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated November 8, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of
December 1, 2004 between CSS Industries, Inc. and Richard
L. Morris (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated January 26, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of
July 11, 2005 between CSS Industries, Inc. and William G.
Kiesling (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated November 9, 2005).
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Separation Agreement and Release
of Claims dated as of April 3, 2006 between CSS Industries,
Inc. and David J.M. Erskine (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated August 9, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of
May 12, 2006 between CSS Industries, Inc. and Christopher
J. Munyan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated August 9, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. Severance Pay
Plan for Senior Management and Summary Plan Description
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated February 2, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of
November 21, 2006 between CSS Industries, Inc. and Robert
Collins (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated February 2, 2007).
|
|
*10
|
.34
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. 2006 Stock
Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors.
|
|
*10
|
.35
|
|
Amendment 2006-1 to the
Non-Qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Covering
Officer-Employees of CSS Industries, Inc.
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
.
|
|
List of Significant Subsidiaries
of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21
to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005).
|
|
*23
|
.
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
*31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer of CSS Industries, Inc. required by
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
*31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer of CSS Industries, Inc. required by
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
*32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer of CSS Industries, Inc. required by
Rule 13a-14(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350.
|
|
*32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer of CSS Industries, Inc. required by
Rule 13a-14(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed or furnished with this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
46
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Column A
|
|
Column B
|
|
|
Column C
|
|
|
Column D
|
|
|
Column E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at
|
|
|
to Costs
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
to Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
at End of
|
|
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable allowances
|
|
$
|
4,119
|
|
|
$
|
4,086
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,355
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
4,850
|
|
Accrued restructuring expenses
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453
|
(c)
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable allowances
|
|
$
|
5,428
|
|
|
$
|
3,326
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,635
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
4,119
|
|
Accrued restructuring expenses
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
632
|
(b)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable allowances
|
|
$
|
6,822
|
|
|
$
|
5,556
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,950
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
5,428
|
|
Accrued restructuring expenses
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,707
|
(b)
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
Notes: |
(a) Includes amounts written off as uncollectible, net of
recoveries.
|
(b) Includes payments and non cash reductions.
(c) Includes payments.
47
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this Annual Report to be signed on behalf of the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
CSS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Registrant
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Christopher
J. Munyan
Christopher
J. Munyan,
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
|
Dated: June 1, 2007
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Annual Report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
|
|
|
Dated: June 1, 2007
|
|
/s/ Christopher
J. Munyan
Christopher
J. Munyan,
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer and a director)
|
|
|
|
Dated: June 1, 2007
|
|
/s/ Clifford
E. Pietrafitta
Clifford
E. Pietrafitta,
Vice President Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
|
|
|
|
Dated: June 1, 2007
|
|
/s/ Jack
Farber
Jack
Farber,
Director
|
|
|
|
Dated: June 1, 2007
|
|
/s/ Scott
A. Beaumont
Scott
A. Beaumont,
Director
|
|
|
|
Dated: June 1, 2007
|
|
/s/ James
H. Bromley
James
H. Bromley,
Director
|
|
|
|
Dated: June 1, 2007
|
|
/s/ Leonard
E. Grossman
Leonard
E. Grossman,
Director
|
|
|
|
Dated: June 1, 2007
|
|
/s/ James
E. Ksansnak
James
E. Ksansnak,
Director
|
|
|
|
Dated: June 1, 2007
|
|
/s/ Rebecca
C. Matthias
Rebecca
C. Matthias,
Director
|
48