FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2008
Commission File Number 1-5620
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
23-1609753 |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer ID No.) |
|
|
|
435 Devon Park Drive |
|
|
Building 800 |
|
|
Wayne, PA
|
|
19087 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(610) 293-0600
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Yes o No þ
Number
of shares outstanding as of November 5, 2008
Common Stock 120,660,059
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
INDEX
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1 Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
2
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per |
|
|
|
share data) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
48,191 |
|
|
$ |
96,201 |
|
Cash held in escrow current |
|
|
6,427 |
|
|
|
20,345 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
60,786 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
Restricted marketable securities |
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
3,904 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances ($6,993 - 2008; $3,370 - 2007) |
|
|
17,294 |
|
|
|
12,702 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
136,921 |
|
|
|
169,829 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
12,053 |
|
|
|
11,714 |
|
Ownership interests in and advances to partner companies |
|
|
91,038 |
|
|
|
90,038 |
|
Long-term restricted marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,949 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
12,729 |
|
|
|
12,729 |
|
Cash held in escrow long-term |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
2,341 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
2,342 |
|
Non-current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
254,447 |
|
|
$ |
390,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of credit line borrowings |
|
$ |
14,384 |
|
|
$ |
13,997 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
1,510 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
3,319 |
|
|
|
3,134 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
5,729 |
|
|
|
6,934 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
6,849 |
|
|
|
14,203 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
30,509 |
|
|
|
89,910 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
9,316 |
|
|
|
9,111 |
|
Convertible senior debentures |
|
|
91,000 |
|
|
|
129,000 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
2,296 |
|
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,916 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable consolidated partner company stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.10 par value; 1,000 shares authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.10 par value; 500,000 shares authorized; 121,589
and 121,123 shares issued and outstanding in 2008 and 2007,
respectively |
|
|
12,159 |
|
|
|
12,112 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
762,323 |
|
|
|
758,515 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(650,132 |
) |
|
|
(617,513 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(1,217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
123,104 |
|
|
|
153,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
254,447 |
|
|
$ |
390,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
18,997 |
|
|
$ |
11,936 |
|
|
$ |
51,799 |
|
|
$ |
30,638 |
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
7,172 |
|
|
|
5,757 |
|
|
|
20,175 |
|
|
|
16,373 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
15,878 |
|
|
|
14,623 |
|
|
|
47,004 |
|
|
|
40,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
23,050 |
|
|
|
20,380 |
|
|
|
67,179 |
|
|
|
56,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(4,053 |
) |
|
|
(8,444 |
) |
|
|
(15,380 |
) |
|
|
(26,249 |
) |
Other income (loss), net |
|
|
7,685 |
|
|
|
(4,431 |
) |
|
|
10,308 |
|
|
|
(5,120 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
2,632 |
|
|
|
6,071 |
|
Recovery related party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,202 |
) |
|
|
(1,342 |
) |
|
|
(3,767 |
) |
|
|
(4,111 |
) |
Equity loss |
|
|
(8,363 |
) |
|
|
(4,407 |
) |
|
|
(20,290 |
) |
|
|
(10,054 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
|
|
4,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
(4,092 |
) |
|
|
(15,622 |
) |
|
|
(23,409 |
) |
|
|
(35,270 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(4,062 |
) |
|
|
(15,622 |
) |
|
|
(23,383 |
) |
|
|
(34,574 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(1,136 |
) |
|
|
(8,738 |
) |
|
|
(9,236 |
) |
|
|
(15,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(5,198 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,360 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,619 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic and diluted
loss per share |
|
|
122,605 |
|
|
|
122,440 |
|
|
|
122,902 |
|
|
|
122,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations |
|
$ |
(14,408 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,783 |
) |
Cash flows from operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
(3,288 |
) |
|
|
(10,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(17,696 |
) |
|
|
(32,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of and distributions from companies and funds |
|
|
3,557 |
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
Acquisitions of ownership interests in partner companies and
funds, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(19,315 |
) |
|
|
(54,054 |
) |
Advances to companies |
|
|
(4,210 |
) |
|
|
(453 |
) |
Repayments of note receivable related party |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in marketable securities |
|
|
(63,010 |
) |
|
|
(111,268 |
) |
Decrease in marketable securities |
|
|
2,814 |
|
|
|
204,880 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(3,279 |
) |
|
|
(2,869 |
) |
Capitalized software costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations, net |
|
|
83,934 |
|
|
|
29,967 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
(2,867 |
) |
|
|
(6,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(2,372 |
) |
|
|
62,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of convertible senior debentures |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on revolving credit facilities |
|
|
24,143 |
|
|
|
24,022 |
|
Repayments on revolving credit facilities |
|
|
(23,756 |
) |
|
|
(18,904 |
) |
Borrowings on term debt |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
Repayments on term debt |
|
|
(2,520 |
) |
|
|
(1,663 |
) |
Issuance of Company common stock, net |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
Issuance of consolidated partner company common stock, net |
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
Repurchase of Company common stock |
|
|
(1,296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
4,790 |
|
|
|
11,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(26,887 |
) |
|
|
16,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(46,955 |
) |
|
|
46,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in cash and cash equivalents from, and advances to
Acsis, Alliance Consulting, Laureate Pharma and Pacific Title &
Art Studio included in assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
(1,055 |
) |
|
|
2,401 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
96,201 |
|
|
|
60,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
48,191 |
|
|
$ |
108,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
1. GENERAL
The accompanying unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements of Safeguard Scientifics,
Inc. (the Company) were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America and the interim financial statements rules and regulations of the SEC.
In the opinion of management, these statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year or for
any interim period. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations relating to
interim financial statements. The Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q
should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and included together with the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in the Companys 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and all partner
companies in which it directly or indirectly owns or owned more than 50% of the outstanding voting
securities during the periods presented.
The Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 and Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007 include Clarient, Inc. (Clarient) in continuing operations.
On May 6, 2008 the Company consummated a transaction (the Bundle Transaction) pursuant to
which it sold all of its equity and debt interests in Acsis, Inc. (Acsis), Alliance Consulting
Group Associates, Inc. (Alliance Consulting), Laureate Pharma, Inc. (Laureate Pharma), ProModel
Corporation (ProModel) and Neuronyx, Inc. (Neuronyx) (collectively, the Bundle Companies).
During the first quarter of 2007, Pacific Title & Art Studio and Clarients technology group
were sold.
See Note 3 for discontinued operations treatment of Acsis, Alliance Consulting, Laureate
Pharma, Pacific Title & Art Studio and Clarients technology group.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company increased its ownership interest
in Authentium, Inc. (Authentium) to the 20.0% threshold at which the Company believes it
exercises significant influence. Accordingly, the Company adopted the equity method of accounting
for its holdings in Authentium. In accordance with APB 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for
Investments in Common Stock, the Company has adjusted the financial statements for prior periods
contained in this Form 10-Q to retrospectively apply the equity method of accounting for its
holdings in Authentium since the initial date of acquisition in April 2006.
3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Acsis, Alliance Consulting and Laureate Pharma
Of the companies included in the Bundle Transaction, Acsis, Alliance Consulting and Laureate
Pharma were majority-owned partner companies; Neuronyx and ProModel were minority-owned partner
companies. The Company has presented the results of operations of Acsis, Alliance Consulting and
Laureate Pharma as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Goodwill of $48.9 million
related to Alliance Consulting and $11.5 million related to Acsis was included in discontinued
operations at December 31, 2007.
In the first quarter of 2008, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $3.6 million to
write down the aggregate carrying value of the Bundle Companies to the total anticipated proceeds,
less estimated costs to complete the Bundle Transaction. In the second quarter of 2008, prior to
the completion of the Bundle Transaction, the Company recorded a net loss of $1.6 million in
discontinued operations related to the operations of Acsis, Alliance Consulting and Laureate
Pharma. In
6
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
the second quarter of 2008 the Company recorded a charge of $0.9 million in discontinued operations
to accrue for severance payments due to the former CEO of Alliance Consulting in connection with
the Bundle Transaction and recorded a pre-tax gain on disposal of $1.4 million which is also
recorded in discontinued operations.
The gross proceeds to the Company from the Bundle Transaction were $74.5 million, of which
$6.4 million is to be held in escrow through April, 2009, plus amounts advanced to certain of the
Bundle Companies during the time between the signing of the Bundle Transaction agreement and its
consummation. Guarantees of partner company credit facilities by the Company of $31.5 million were
eliminated upon the closing of the Bundle Transaction.
Pacific Title & Art Studio
In March 2007, the Company sold Pacific Title & Art Studio for net cash proceeds of
approximately $21.9 million, including $2.3 million cash to be held in escrow. As a result of the
sale, the Company recorded a pre-tax gain of $2.7 million in the first quarter of 2007. During the
three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded a loss of $1.1 million
and $1.6 million, which was included within Loss from discontinued operations in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations, related to additional compensation paid to the former CEO of Pacific
Title & Art Studio in connection with the March 2007 sale and related legal fees (see Note 15).
Pacific Title & Art Studio is reported in discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Clarient Technology Group
In March 2007, Clarient sold its ACIS technology group for net cash proceeds of $11.0 million
(excluding $1.5 million in contingent purchase price). As a result of the sale, Clarient recorded
a pre-tax gain of $3.6 million in the first quarter of 2007. The technology group is reported in
discontinued operations for all periods presented. Goodwill of $2.1 million related to the
technology group was included in discontinued operations at December 31, 2007.
Results of all discontinued operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,749 |
|
|
$ |
45,712 |
|
|
$ |
105,123 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,563 |
) |
|
|
(49,668 |
) |
|
|
(118,180 |
) |
Impairment of carrying value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,438 |
) |
|
|
(3,634 |
) |
|
|
(5,438 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(452 |
) |
|
|
(1,547 |
) |
|
|
(1,408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income taxes and
minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,704 |
) |
|
|
(9,137 |
) |
|
|
(19,903 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,704 |
) |
|
|
(9,137 |
) |
|
|
(19,895 |
) |
Gain (loss) on disposal, net of tax |
|
|
(1,136 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
6,273 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(2,155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of tax |
|
$ |
(1,136 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,738 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,236 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
The assets and liabilities of discontinued operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash |
|
$ |
3,764 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances |
|
|
24,858 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
3,333 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
32,867 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
23,859 |
|
Intangibles |
|
|
9,960 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
64,095 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
132,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
28,257 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
4,520 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
10,774 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
6,100 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
50,132 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
3,840 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
396 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,026 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
56,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value |
|
$ |
76,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
4. MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Marketable securities included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Non-Current |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
60,135 |
|
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Agency Bonds |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62,760 |
|
|
$ |
4,494 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, the contractual maturities of all securities were less than one
year.
8
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
5. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In October 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position
FAS157-3 Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not
Active (FSP FAS157-3) which clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in an inactive market and
illustrates how an entity would determine fair value when the market for a financial asset is not
active. FSP FAS 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial
statements had not been issued. The adoption of FSP FAS157-3 did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 allows companies to choose, at specific election
dates, to measure eligible financial assets and liabilities that are not otherwise required to be
measured at fair value, at fair value. Under SFAS No. 159, companies would report unrealized gains
and losses for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent
reporting date, and recognize up-front costs and fees related to those items in earnings as
incurred. SFAS No. 159 became effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements due to its election to not measure partner company holdings at fair value.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157
is applicable whenever another accounting pronouncement requires or permits assets and liabilities
to be measured at fair value. The requirements of SFAS No. 157 became effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. However, in February 2008, the FASB decided that an entity need
not apply this standard to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at
fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis until the subsequent year. The
adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
141(R)). SFAS No. 141(R) significantly changes the accounting for business combinations. Under
SFAS No. 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date at fair value with limited exceptions.
SFAS No. 141(R) further changes the accounting treatment for certain specific items, including:
|
§ |
|
Acquisition costs will be generally expensed as incurred; |
|
|
§ |
|
Non-controlling interests (formerly known as minority interests see SFAS No. 160
discussion below) will be valued at fair value at the acquisition date; |
|
|
§ |
|
Acquired contingent liabilities will be recorded at fair value at the acquisition
date and subsequently measured at either the higher of such amount or the amount
determined under existing guidance for non-acquired contingencies; |
|
|
§ |
|
In-process research and development (IPR&D) will be recorded at fair value as an
indefinite-lived intangible asset at the acquisition date; |
|
|
§ |
|
Restructuring costs associated with a business combination will be generally
expensed subsequent to the acquisition date; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties
after the acquisition date generally will affect income tax expense. |
SFAS No. 141(R) includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 141(R)
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after
January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes new
accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of
non-controlling interests (minority interests) as equity in the consolidated financial statements
and separate from the parents equity. The amount of net income attributable to non-controlling
interests will be included in consolidated net
9
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
income on the face of the income statement. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parents
ownership interest in a subsidiary that does not result in deconsolidation are treated as equity
transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement
requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated.
Such gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the non-controlling equity investment on
the deconsolidation date. SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the
interests of the parent and its non-controlling interest. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 will result in the
reclassification of minority interests from long term liabilities to shareholders equity.
Minority interest at September 30, 2008 was $0.2 million.
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (SFAS No. 162). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources for generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the U.S. and lists the categories in descending order.
An entity should follow the highest category of GAAP applicable for each of its accounting
transactions. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following the SECs approval of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The adoption of SFAS No. 162 will not
have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
6. COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Comprehensive loss is the change in equity of a business enterprise from transactions and
other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Excluding net loss, the Companys sources
of comprehensive loss are from net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on available-for-sale
securities and foreign currency translation adjustments. Reclassification adjustments result from
the recognition in net income (loss) of unrealized gains or losses that were included in
comprehensive income (loss) in prior periods.
The following summarizes the components of comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(4,062 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,622 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,383 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
Unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(4,060 |
) |
|
|
(15,623 |
) |
|
|
(23,383 |
) |
|
|
(35,123 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(1,136 |
) |
|
|
(8,738 |
) |
|
|
(9,236 |
) |
|
|
(15,777 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(5,196 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,344 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,673 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
7. LONG-TERM DEBT AND CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS
Consolidated long-term debt consisted of the following:
Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated partner company credit line borrowings
(guaranteed by the Company) |
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
Consolidated partner company secured revolving credit facility
(not guaranteed by the Company) |
|
|
5,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated partner company credit line borrowings (not
guaranteed by the Company) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,384 |
|
|
|
13,997 |
|
Capital lease obligations and other borrowings |
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,952 |
|
|
|
16,413 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
(14,612 |
) |
|
|
(15,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt of continuing operations, less current portion |
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Consolidated partner company credit line borrowings
(guaranteed by the Company) |
|
$ |
18,500 |
|
Consolidated partner company credit line borrowings
(not guaranteed by the Company) |
|
|
7,515 |
|
Consolidated partner company term loans and other borrowings
(guaranteed by the Company) |
|
|
6,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,034 |
|
Capital lease obligations and other borrowings |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,097 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
(28,257 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt of discontinued operations, less current portion |
|
$ |
3,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company maintains a revolving credit facility that provides for borrowings and issuances
of letters of credit and guarantees, up to $30.0 million. The credit facility expires on June 29,
2009. Borrowing availability under the facility is reduced by the amounts outstanding for the
Companys borrowings and letters of credit and amounts guaranteed under Clarients credit facility
maintained with that same lender. This credit facility bears interest at the prime rate (5.0% at
September 30, 2008) for outstanding borrowings. The credit facility is subject to an unused
commitment fee of 0.125% per annum, which is subject to reduction based on deposits maintained at
the bank. The credit facility requires the Company to maintain an unrestricted cash collateral
account at that same bank, equal to the Companys borrowings and letters of credit and amounts
borrowed by Clarient under its guaranteed facility maintained with that same bank. At September
30, 2008, the required cash collateral, pursuant to the Companys credit facility agreement, was
$18.6 million, which amount was included within Cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2008. Cash collateral requirements of $21.3 million were
eliminated upon closing of the Bundle Transaction.
11
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
Availability under the Companys revolving credit facility at September 30, 2008 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Size of facility |
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
Guaranty of Clarients facility at same bank |
|
|
(12,300 |
) |
Outstanding letter of credit (a) |
|
|
(6,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amount available |
|
$ |
11,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In connection with the sale of CompuCom Systems, Inc. (CompuCom) in 2004, the
Company provided a letter of credit to the landlord of CompuComs Dallas headquarters,
which letter of credit will expire on March 19, 2019, in an amount equal to $6.3 million. |
Clarient maintains a $12.0 million credit facility with the same lender as the Company.
Outstanding borrowings under the credit facility at September 30, 2008 were $9.0 million. The
remaining availability under the credit facility was used to obtain a $3.0 million standby letter
of credit for the landlord of Clarients leased facility in California. At Clarients option,
borrowings bear interest at variable rates based on the prime rate minus 0.5% or a rate equal to
30-day London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.45%, provided however, that upon the
achievement of certain financial performance metrics, the rate will decrease by 0.25%. This
facility contains financial and non-financial covenants and matures February 26, 2009.
On July 31, 2008, Clarient entered into a secured revolving credit agreement under which
Clarient may borrow up to $8.0 million which is secured by Clarients accounts receivable and
related assets. The amount which Clarient is entitled to borrow under the revolving credit
facility at a particular time ($5.4 million as of September 30, 2008) is based on the amount of
Clarients qualified accounts receivable and certain liquidity factors. Borrowings under the
revolving credit facility, which may be repaid and re-borrowed, bear interest at a rate per annum
equal to 30-day LIBOR (subject to a minimum annual rate of 2.50% at all times) plus an applicable
margin of 5.25%. If Clarient meets certain financial benchmarks for its 2008 fiscal year, the
applicable margin may be reduced to 4.75% beginning in January 2009. Clarient pays an unused
commitment fee of 0.75% per annum, and the facility is subject to a maximum prepayment fee of $0.2
million. The revolving credit facilitys current maturity date is January 31, 2009. The maturity
date may be extended for two additional 12 month periods upon the satisfaction of certain
conditions. The Company has entered into a subordination agreement with the lender relating to
the revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility contains certain financial covenants.
In September 2006, Clarient entered into a $5.0 million senior secured revolving credit
agreement with a third party lender. Borrowing availability under the agreement was based on the
level of Clarients qualified accounts receivable, less certain reserves. The agreement bore
interest at variable rates based on the lower of the 30-day LIBOR plus 3.25%, or the prime rate
plus 0.5%. On March 17, 2008, Clarient borrowed $4.6 million from the Company under the
subordinated revolving credit line provided by the Company to Clarient to repay and terminate this
facility, and borrowed an additional $2.8 million from the Company to repay and terminate its
equipment line of credit with the same lender.
Guarantees of partner company facilities by the Company of $31.5 million were eliminated upon
the closing of the Bundle Transaction.
Debt as of September 30, 2008 bore interest at fixed rates between 11.5% and 13.1% and
variable rates between the 30-day LIBOR (subject to a minimum annual rate of 2.50% at all times)
plus an applicable margin of 5.25% and the prime rate plus 0.5%, with a weighted average rate of
6.5%.
12
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
The Companys debt matures as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Remainder of 2008 |
|
$ |
54 |
|
2009 |
|
|
14,619 |
|
2010 |
|
|
246 |
|
2011 |
|
|
33 |
|
2012 and thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
14,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
8. CONVERTIBLE SENIOR DEBENTURES
In February 2004, the Company completed the sale of $150.0 million in face value of 2.625%
convertible senior debentures with a stated maturity of March 15, 2024 (the 2024 Debentures).
Interest on the 2024 Debentures is payable semi-annually. At the debenture holders option, the
2024 Debentures are convertible into the Companys common stock through March 14, 2024, subject to
certain conditions. The conversion rate of the debentures is $7.2174 of principal amount per share.
The closing price of the Companys common stock at September 30, 2008 was $1.25. The 2024
Debenture holders have the right to require the Company to repurchase the 2024 Debentures on March
21, 2011, March 20, 2014 or March 20, 2019 at a repurchase price equal to 100% of their face
amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The 2024 Debenture holders also have the right to
require repurchase of the 2024 Debentures upon certain events, including sale of all or
substantially all of our common stock or assets, liquidation, dissolution or a change in control.
Subject to certain conditions, the Company may redeem all or some of the 2024 Debentures commencing
March 20, 2009. During the third quarter 2008, the Company repurchased $38.0 million of the face
value of the 2024 debentures for $30.0 million in cash, including accrued interest. In connection
with the repurchase, the Company recorded $0.4 million of expense related to the acceleration of
deferred debt issuance costs associated with the 2024 debentures, resulting in a net gain of $7.6
million which is included in Other income. During 2006, the Company repurchased $21.0 million of
face value of the 2024 Debentures for $16.4 million in cash, including accrued interest. At
September 30, 2008, the market value of the outstanding $91.0 million in face value of 2024
Debentures was approximately $63.0 million, based on quoted market prices.
As required by the terms of the 2024 Debentures, after completing the sale of CompuCom in
October 2004, the Company escrowed $16.7 million for interest payments through March 15, 2009 on
the 2024 Debentures. A total of $2.0 million is included in Restricted marketable securities on
the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2008, which is classified as a current asset.
9. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123(R)) using the modified prospective method.
Classification of Stock-Based Compensation Expense
Stock-based compensation expense from continuing operations was recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
Selling, general & administrative |
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
4,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
853 |
|
|
$ |
1,188 |
|
|
$ |
2,505 |
|
|
$ |
4,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
The Company
The fair value of the Companys stock-based awards to employees was estimated at the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free rate was based on the U.S.
Treasury yield curve in effect at the end of the quarter in which the grant occurred. The expected
term of stock options granted was estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees.
Expected volatility was based on historical volatility measured using weekly price observations of
the Companys common stock for a period equal to the stock options expected term. The Company
issued 2.0 million performance-based awards and 1.2 million service-based awards to employees
during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 1.5 million market-based awards, 2.0 million
performance-based awards and 1.7 million service-based awards during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. The Company also issued 0.2 million deferred stock units to directors during
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
Service-Based Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
0% |
|
0% |
|
0% |
|
0% |
Expected volatility |
|
52% |
|
58% |
|
52% |
|
61% |
Average expected option term |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
3.0% |
|
4.2% |
|
3.1% |
|
4.5% |
Performance-Based Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
0% |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
50% |
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
Average expected option term |
|
4.4 years |
|
|
|
4.4 years |
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
3.0% |
|
|
|
3.0% |
|
|
Market-Based Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
0% |
|
0% |
|
0% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
|
55% |
|
59% |
|
54% |
Average expected option term |
|
|
|
6 years |
|
6 years |
|
6 years |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
|
4.9% |
|
3.4% |
|
4.9% |
Market-based awards entitle participants to vest in a number of options determined by
achievement of certain target market capitalization increases (measured by reference to stock price
increases on a specified number of outstanding shares) over an eight-year period. The requisite
service periods for the market-based awards are based on the Companys estimate of the dates on
which the market conditions will be met as determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model.
Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service periods using the straight-line
method, but is accelerated if market capitalization targets are achieved earlier than estimated.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, 0 and 41 thousand options, respectively,
vested based on achievement of market capitalization targets. The Company recorded $0.2 million
compensation expense related to these awards during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008. Depending on the Companys stock performance, the maximum number of unvested shares at
September 30, 2008 attainable under these grants was 7.9 million shares.
Performance-based awards entitle participants to vest in a number of options determined by
achievement of target capital returns based on net cash proceeds received by the Company on the
sale, merger or other exit transaction of certain identified partner companies over an eight-year
period. Vesting occurs once per year on the anniversary date of the grant. The requisite service
periods for the performance-based awards are based on the Companys estimate of when the
performance conditions will be met. Compensation expense is recognized for performance-based
awards for which the performance condition is considered probable of achievement. Compensation
expense is recognized over the requisite service periods using the straight-line method, but is
accelerated if capital return targets are achieved earlier than estimated. No compensation expense
was recognized related to these awards during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 as
awards were
14
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
granted at the end of the period. The aggregate grant date fair value of performance-based
options issued during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $1.1 million.
All other outstanding options are service-based awards that generally vest over four years
after the date of grant and expire eight years after the date of grant. Compensation expense is
recognized over the requisite service period using the straight-line method. The requisite service
period for service-based awards is the period over which the award vests. The Company recorded
$0.3 million and $0.5 million of compensation expense related to these awards during the three
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $0.8 million and $1.5 million during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Majority-Owned Partner Companies
Stock options granted by majority-owned partner companies generally are service-based awards
that vest over four years after the date of grant and expire seven to 10 years after the date of
grant. Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period using the
straight-line method. The requisite service period is the period over which the award vests. The
fair value of the Companys majority-owned partner companies stock-based awards to employees were
estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free rate
was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the end of the quarter in which the grant
occurred. The expected term of stock options granted was estimated using the historical exercise
behavior of employees. Expected volatility for Clarient, the Companys publicly-held consolidated
partner company, was based on historical price volatility measured using weekly price observations
of Clarients common stock for a period equal to the stock options expected term.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, Clarient granted 2.3 million options and 0.2
million restricted stock awards. The restricted stock awards vest over four years. The options
generally have four-year vesting terms and a ten-year contractual term. The fair value of these
options at the date of grant was based on the following assumptions: a risk-free rate of 2.5%
3.4%, an expected stock option term of five years, a dividend yield of 0.0% and expected five year
volatility of 77% 80%. Clarient estimates forfeitures of stock options using historical exercise
behavior of its employees. For purposes of this estimate, Clarient identified two groups of
employees and estimated the forfeiture rates for these groups to be 5% and 8% for the first nine
months of 2008. Clarient recorded $0.2 million and $0.4 million of stock-based compensation
expense during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $1.4 million
and $1.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
10. INCOME TAXES
The Companys consolidated income tax benefit was $30 thousand for the three months ended
September 30, 2008, and $26 thousand and $696 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The income tax benefit recognized in each period resulted from the
reversal of reserves that related to uncertain tax positions for which the statute of limitations
expired during the period in the applicable tax jurisdictions less the Companys share of net state
tax expense recorded by its consolidated partner company. The Company has recorded a valuation
allowance to reduce its net deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be
realized in future years. Accordingly, the benefit of the net operating loss that would have been
recognized in 2008 and 2007 was offset by a valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2007, the
Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards and federal capital loss carryforwards of $208
million and $162 million, respectively, as adjusted to exclude carryforwards apportioned to the
consolidated Bundle Companies which are reported in discontinued operations.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). During the
first nine months of 2008, the Company had no material changes in uncertain tax positions.
15
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
11. NET LOSS PER SHARE
The calculations of net loss per share were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share data) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(4,062 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,622 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,383 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,574 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(1,136 |
) |
|
|
(8,738 |
) |
|
|
(9,236 |
) |
|
|
(15,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(5,198 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,360 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,619 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
122,605 |
|
|
|
122,440 |
|
|
|
122,902 |
|
|
|
122,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding for purposes of computing net loss per
share includes outstanding common shares and vested deferred stock units (DSUs).
If a consolidated or equity method partner company has dilutive stock options, unvested
restricted stock, DSUs, warrants or securities outstanding, diluted net loss per share is computed
by first deducting from net loss, the income attributable to the potential exercise of the dilutive
securities of the company. This impact is shown as an adjustment to net loss for purposes of
calculating diluted net loss per share.
The following potential shares of common stock and their effects on income were excluded from
the diluted net loss per share calculation because their effect would be anti-dilutive:
|
§ |
|
At September 30, 2008 and 2007 options to purchase 22.2 million and 21.6 million
shares of common stock, respectively, at prices ranging from $1.03 to $14.84 per share,
were excluded from the calculations. |
|
|
§ |
|
At September 30, 2008 and 2007, unvested restricted stock units and DSUs convertible
into 0.1 million shares were excluded from the calculations. |
|
|
§ |
|
At September 30, 2008 and 2007, a total of 12.6 million and 17.9 million shares
related to the Companys 2024 Debentures (see Note 8) representing the weighted average
effect of assumed conversion of the 2024 Debentures were excluded from the calculations. |
16
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
12. PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Parent company financial information is provided to present the financial position and results
of operations of the Company as if its consolidated partner company, Clarient, (see Note 2) was
accounted for under the equity method of accounting for all periods presented during which the
Company owned its interest in Clarient.
Parent Company Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
46,321 |
|
|
$ |
94,685 |
|
Cash held in escrow current |
|
|
6,427 |
|
|
|
20,345 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
60,786 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
Restricted marketable securities |
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
3,904 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
116,247 |
|
|
|
197,919 |
|
Ownership interests in and advances to companies |
|
|
108,374 |
|
|
|
97,955 |
|
Long-term restricted marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,949 |
|
Cash held in
escrow long-term |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
2,341 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
226,665 |
|
|
$ |
302,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
7,268 |
|
|
$ |
15,494 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
5,293 |
|
|
|
5,012 |
|
Convertible senior debentures |
|
|
91,000 |
|
|
|
129,000 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
123,104 |
|
|
|
153,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
226,665 |
|
|
$ |
302,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
Parent Company Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Operating expenses |
|
$ |
(4,210 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,870 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,624 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,609 |
) |
Other income (loss), net |
|
|
7,685 |
|
|
|
(4,431 |
) |
|
|
10,308 |
|
|
|
(5,120 |
) |
Recovery related party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
6,023 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(999 |
) |
|
|
(1,056 |
) |
|
|
(3,106 |
) |
|
|
(3,166 |
) |
Equity loss |
|
|
(7,474 |
) |
|
|
(6,040 |
) |
|
|
(19,608 |
) |
|
|
(15,424 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(4,092 |
) |
|
|
(15,622 |
) |
|
|
(23,413 |
) |
|
|
(35,284 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
Equity loss attributable to discontinued operations |
|
|
(1,136 |
) |
|
|
(8,738 |
) |
|
|
(9,236 |
) |
|
|
(15,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(5,198 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,360 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,619 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(11,504 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,214 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of and distributions from companies and funds |
|
|
3,557 |
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
Advances to companies |
|
|
(14,218 |
) |
|
|
(1,953 |
) |
Acquisitions of ownership interests in partner companies and funds,
net of cash acquired |
|
|
(19,315 |
) |
|
|
(54,054 |
) |
Repayments of note receivable related party |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in marketable securities |
|
|
(63,010 |
) |
|
|
(111,268 |
) |
Decrease in marketable securities |
|
|
2,814 |
|
|
|
204,880 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
84,517 |
|
|
|
19,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(5,679 |
) |
|
|
59,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of convertible senior debentures |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Company common stock, net |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
Repurchase of Company common stock |
|
|
(1,296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(31,181 |
) |
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(48,364 |
) |
|
|
46,984 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
94,685 |
|
|
|
59,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
46,321 |
|
|
$ |
106,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company cash and cash equivalents excludes marketable securities, which consist of
longer-term securities, including commercial paper and certificates of deposit.
18
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
13. OPERATING SEGMENTS
As of September 30, 2008 the Company held an interest in one majority-owned partner company,
Clarient, and 15 minority-owned partner companies. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company
re-evaluated its reportable operating segments in accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. As a result of the re-evaluation, the
Companys reportable operating segments are now as follows: i) Clarient, its publicly-traded
consolidated partner company, ii) Life Sciences and iii) Technology.
The Life Sciences segment includes the following partner companies as of September 30, 2008:
Advanced BioHealing, Inc., Alverix, Inc., Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc., Cellumen, Inc., NuPathe,
Inc., Rubicor Medical, Inc. and a new yet-to-be announced partner company.
The Technology segment includes the following partner companies as of September 30, 2008:
Advantedge Healthcare Solutions, Inc., Authentium, Inc., Beyond.com, Inc., Bridgevine, Inc., Kadoo,
Inc., GENBAND Inc., Portico Systems, Inc. and Swaptree, Inc.
Results of the Life Sciences and Technology segments reflect the equity income (loss) of their
respective equity method partner companies, other income (loss) associated with cost method partner
companies and the gains or losses on the sale of their respective partner companies.
The Companys reportable operating segments for the year ended December 31, 2007 were: i)
Acsis, ii) Alliance Consulting, iii) Clarient, iv) Laureate Pharma and v) Other Companies. Acsis,
Alliance Consulting and Laureate Pharma were majority-owned partner companies which are now
reported within discontinued operations due to the Bundle Transaction. The Other Companies
segment consisted of the operations of non-consolidated partner companies (currently separate
segments Life Sciences and Technology) and the Companys ownership in private equity funds
(currently included within Other Items). The Other Companies segment also included the gain or
loss on the sale of companies (currently included within the respective Life Sciences and
Technology segments) and private equity funds (currently included within Other Items), except for
gains and losses included in discontinued operations.
Management evaluates its Clarient segment performance based on revenue, operating income
(loss) and income (loss) before income taxes, which reflects the portion of income (loss) allocated
to minority shareholders. Management evaluates its Life Sciences and Technology segments
performance based on net loss which is based on the number of partner companies accounted for under
the equity method, the Companys voting ownership percentage in these partner companies and the net
results of operations of these partner companies and any impairment charges or gain (loss) on sale
of partner companies.
Other Items include certain expenses which are not identifiable to the operations of the
Companys operating business segments. Other Items primarily consist of general and administrative
expenses related to corporate operations, including employee compensation, insurance and
professional fees, including legal and finance, interest income, interest expense, other income
(loss) and equity income (loss) related to private equity fund holdings. Other Items also include
income taxes, which are reviewed by management independent of segment results.
The following tables reflect the Companys consolidated operating data by reportable segment.
Segment results include the results of Clarient, the Companys consolidated partner company,
impairment charges, gains or losses related to the disposition of partner companies (except those
reported in discontinued operations) the Companys share of income or losses for entities accounted
for under the equity method and the mark-to-market of trading securities. All significant
intersegment activity has been eliminated in consolidation. Accordingly, segment results reported
by the Company exclude the effect of transactions between the Company and its consolidated partner
company.
Revenue is attributed to geographic areas based on where the services are performed or the
customers shipped to location. A majority of the Companys revenue is generated in the United
States.
As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Companys assets were primarily located in
the United States.
19
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
The following represents segment data from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Other |
|
Continuing |
|
|
Clarient |
|
Sciences |
|
Technology |
|
Segments |
|
Items |
|
Operations |
Revenue |
|
$ |
18,997 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,997 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,997 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
(4,210 |
) |
|
|
(4,053 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
(6,326 |
) |
|
|
(1,968 |
) |
|
|
(7,405 |
) |
|
|
3,343 |
|
|
|
(4,062 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
45,118 |
|
|
$ |
34,636 |
|
|
$ |
47,356 |
|
|
$ |
127,110 |
|
|
$ |
127,337 |
|
|
$ |
254,447 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
39,502 |
|
|
|
40,829 |
|
|
|
42,297 |
|
|
|
122,628 |
|
|
|
135,447 |
|
|
|
258,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Other |
|
Continuing |
|
|
Clarient |
|
Sciences |
|
Technology |
|
Segments |
|
Items |
|
Operations |
Revenue |
|
$ |
11,936 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,936 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,936 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(2,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,574 |
) |
|
|
(5,870 |
) |
|
|
(8,444 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(1,633 |
) |
|
|
(7,553 |
) |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
(10,519 |
) |
|
|
(5,103 |
) |
|
|
(15,622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Other |
|
Continuing |
|
|
Clarient |
|
Sciences |
|
Technology |
|
Segments |
|
Items |
|
Operations |
Revenue |
|
$ |
51,799 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,799 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,799 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(1,756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,756 |
) |
|
|
(13,624 |
) |
|
|
(15,380 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
(14,275 |
) |
|
|
(5,882 |
) |
|
|
(19,471 |
) |
|
|
(3,912 |
) |
|
|
(23,383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Other |
|
Continuing |
|
|
Clarient |
|
Sciences |
|
Technology |
|
Segments |
|
Items |
|
Operations |
Revenue |
|
$ |
30,638 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,638 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,638 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(8,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,640 |
) |
|
|
(17,609 |
) |
|
|
(26,249 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(5,356 |
) |
|
|
(11,673 |
) |
|
|
(3,642 |
) |
|
|
(20,671 |
) |
|
|
(13,903 |
) |
|
|
(34,574 |
) |
20
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
Other Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate operations |
|
$ |
3,313 |
|
|
$ |
(5,103 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,938 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,599 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,343 |
|
|
$ |
(5,103 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,912 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
Acquisitions by the Company 2008
In September 2008, the Company acquired 37% of a yet-to-be announced Life Sciences partner
company for $3.0 million in cash, including the conversion into equity interests of $1.9 million
previously advanced to the company. The Company accounts for its holdings in this partner company
under the equity method. The difference between the Companys cost and its interest in the
underlying net assets, based on the Companys preliminary allocation, was allocated in-process
research and development, resulting in a $2.3 million charge which is reflected in Equity loss in
the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
In August 2008, the Company deployed $1.5 million in Alverix, Inc. (Alverix), maintaining a
50.0% ownership interest. The Company had previously acquired its ownership interest in Alverix
for $2.4 million in cash in October 2007. Alverix has developed a next-generation platform for
quantifying and analyzing assays in the point-of-care diagnostics market. The technology utilizes
optical sensors, image processing software and signal enhancement algorithms to achieve more
accurate measurements in an inexpensive, miniaturized meter. The Company accounts for its holdings
in Alverix under the equity method. The difference between the Companys cost and its interest in
the underlying net assets of Alverix was allocated to intangible assets and goodwill as reflected
in the carrying value in Ownership interests in and advances to partner companies on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In the third quarter of 2008, the Company funded NextPoint Networks, $1.6 million in cash. In
September 2008, NextPoint Networks was merged with GENBAND, resulting in the Company holding a 2.3%
ownership interest in the combined company. In September and December 2007, the Company funded
NexTone Communications, Inc., a predecessor entity to NextPoint Networks, $2.2 million and $2.1
million in cash, respectively. The Company accounts for its holdings in GENBAND under the cost
method.
In July 2008, the Company provided additional funding to Authentium in the form of $0.8
million convertible notes. In conjunction with this funding, due to anti-dilution provisions
contained in an earlier equity funding, the Companys voting interest in Authentium increased from
19.9% to 20.0%, the threshold at which the Company believes it exercises significant influence.
Accordingly, the Company adopted the equity method of accounting for its holdings in Authentium.
See Note 16 regarding the change in accounting treatment for the Companys holdings in Authentium
from the cost method to the equity method. The Company previously had acquired an interest in
Authentium in June 2007 and April 2006 for $3.0 million and $5.5 million, respectively. Authentium
is a provider of security software to internet service providers.
In July 2008, the Company acquired 29.3% of Swaptree, Inc. (Swaptree) for $3.4 million in
cash. Swaptree is an internet-based service that leverages a proprietary trading technology to
enable users to swap books, CDs, DVDs and video games. The Company accounts for its holdings in
Swaptree under the equity method. The difference between the Companys cost and its interest in
the underlying net assets of Swaptree was allocated to intangible assets and goodwill as reflected
in the carrying value in Ownership interests in and advances to partner companies on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In July 2008, the Company deployed $3.3 million of cash in NuPathe, Inc (NuPathe), resulting
in an ownership interest of 23.4%. In April 2008, the Company deployed $1.0 million in cash in
NuPathe at which time the Companys
21
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
ownership interest was 27.8%. The Company previously deployed $5.0 million in NuPathe in 2007 and
2006. NuPathe develops therapeutics in conjunction with novel delivery technologies. The Company
accounts for its holdings in NuPathe under the equity method. As a result of the decrease in the
Companys ownership position in the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recognized a
$0.7 million change in interest gain directly to additional paid-in capital. The difference
between the Companys cost and its interest in the underlying net assets of NuPathe has been
allocated to in-process research and development, resulting in charges of $0.1 million and $0.2
million in 2008 and 2007, respectively, which are reflected in Equity loss in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations and goodwill as reflected in the carrying value in Ownership interests in
and advances to partner companies on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company expects to
recognize a $1.3 million charge in the fourth quarter of 2008, related to an in-process research
and development charge recorded by NuPathe.
In May 2008, the Company increased its ownership interest in Advantedge Healthcare Solutions
(AHS) from 35.1% to 37.9% for $3.2 million in cash. AHS is a New Jersey-based technology-enabled
service provider that delivers medical billing services to physician groups. The Company accounts
for its holdings in AHS under the equity method. The difference between the Companys cost and its
interest in the underlying net assets of AHS was allocated to intangible assets and goodwill as
reflected in the carrying value in Ownership interests in and advances to partner companies on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In February 2008, the Company deployed $2.8 million of cash in Portico Systems, Inc
(Portico), maintaining a 46.8% ownership interest. The Company previously had acquired an
interest in Portico in August 2006 for $6.0 million in cash. Portico is a software solutions
provider for regional and national health plans looking to optimize provider network operations and
streamline business processes. The Company accounts for its holdings in Portico under the equity
method. The difference between the Companys cost and its interest in the underlying net assets of
Portico was allocated to intangible assets and goodwill as reflected in the carrying value in
Ownership interests in and advances to partner companies on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Acquisitions by the Company 2007
In August 2007, the Company acquired 21.1% of Bridgevine, Inc. (Bridgevine), formerly known
as Broadband National, Inc., for $8.0 million in cash. Bridgevine is an internet media company
that operates a network of shopping websites focused on digital services and products such as high
speed internet, digital phone, VoIP, TV and music. The Company accounts for its holdings in
Bridgevine under the equity method. The difference between the Companys cost and its interest in
the underlying net assets of Bridgevine was allocated to intangible assets and goodwill as
reflected in the carrying value in Ownership interests in and advances to partner companies on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In August 2007, the Company acquired 14.0% of Kadoo, Inc. (Kadoo) for $2.2 million in cash.
Kadoo provides users a single interface to manage Web applications such as email and contacts and
also for social networking functions such as tagging and sharing; and provides storage for digital
content such as photos, files and videos. The Company accounts for its holdings in Kadoo under the
cost method.
In June 2007, the Company acquired 40.3% of Cellumen, Inc. (Cellumen) for $6.0 million in
cash. Cellumen is a cellular systems biology company whose technology optimizes the drug discovery
process. The Company accounts for its holdings in Cellumen under the equity method. The
difference between the Companys cost and its interest in the underlying net assets of Cellumen was
allocated to in-process research and development, resulting in a $0.2 million charge which is
reflected in Equity loss in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, and to intangible assets and goodwill as reflected in the carrying value in
Ownership interests in and advances to partner companies on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In May 2007, the Company acquired 14.2% of Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. (Avid) for $7.3
million in cash. Avid develops molecular imaging products for neurodegenerative diseases and
diabetes. The Company accounts for its holdings in Avid under the cost method.
In May 2007, the Company increased its ownership interest in Advanced BioHealing, Inc. (ABH)
to 28.3% for $2.8 million in cash. The Company previously had acquired a 23.9% interest in ABH in
February 2007 for $8.0 million in cash. ABH is a specialty biotechnology company focused on the
development and marketing of cell-based and tissue engineered
22
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
products. The Company accounts for its holdings in ABH under the equity method. The
difference between the Companys cost and its interest in the underlying net assets of ABH was
allocated to intangible assets and goodwill as reflected in the carrying value in Ownership
interests in and advances to partner companies on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In March 2007, the Company acquired 37.1% of Beyond.com, Inc. (Beyond.com) for $13.5 million
in cash. Beyond.com is a provider of online technology and career services to job seekers and
corporations. The Company accounts for its holdings in Beyond.com under the equity method. The
difference between the Companys cost and its interest in the underlying net assets of Beyond.com
was allocated to intangible assets and goodwill as reflected in the carrying value in Ownership
interests in and advances to partner companies on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company and its partner companies are involved in various claims and legal actions arising
in the ordinary course of business. While in the current opinion of the Company the ultimate
disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated
financial position or results of operations, no assurance can be given as to the outcome of these
actions, and one or more adverse rulings could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position and results of operations or that of its partner companies.
The Company had the following outstanding guarantees at September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Included |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on Consolidated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Clarient credit facility |
|
$ |
12,300 |
|
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
Other guarantees |
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,050 |
|
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has committed capital of approximately $7.7 million, including conditional
commitments to provide non-consolidated partner companies with additional funding and commitments
made to various private equity funds in prior years. These commitments will be funded over the
next several years, including approximately $7.5 million which is expected to be funded during the
next 12 months.
Under certain circumstances, the Company may be required to return a portion or all the
distributions it received as a general partner of certain private equity funds (the clawback).
The maximum clawback the Company could be required to return due to its general partner interest is
approximately $3.6 million of which $1.1 million was reflected in Accrued expenses and other
current liabilities and $2.5 million was reflected in Other long-term liabilities on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2008. The Company paid $3.0 million of its estimated
clawback liabilities in July 2008.
The Companys ownership in the funds which have potential clawback liabilities ranges from
19-30%. The clawback liability is joint and several, such that the Company may be required to fund
the clawback for other general partners should they default. The funds have taken several steps to
reduce the potential liabilities should other general partners default, including withholding all
general partner distributions and placing them in escrow and adding rights of set-off among certain
funds. The Company believes its potential liability due to the possibility of default by other
general partners is remote.
Notwithstanding the closing of the Bundle Transaction, the Company remains a guarantor of
Laureate Pharmas Princeton, New Jersey office facility lease. Such guarantee may extend through
its expiration in 2016 under certain circumstances. However, the Company is entitled to
indemnification and certain payments in connection with the continuation of such guaranty. As of
September 30, 2008, scheduled lease payments to be made by Laureate Pharma over the remaining lease
term equal $9.4 million.
23
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
In anticipation of the sale of Pacific Title & Art Studio in the first quarter of 2007, the
Company permitted the employment agreement of the Pacific Title & Art Studio CEO to expire without
renewal, and thereby his employment ceased. Following the sale, the former CEO demanded payment of
severance benefits under his employment agreement, as well as payment of his deferred stock units
and other amounts substantially in excess of the maximum amounts the Company believed were arguably
due. The former CEO and the Company thereafter engaged in negotiations, but were ultimately unable
to settle on the appropriate amounts due. On or about August 13, 2007, the former CEO filed a
complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Central
District, against the Company and Pacific Title & Art Studio, alleging, among other things:
wrongful termination, conversion, unfair competition, violation of the labor code, breach of
contract and negligence. On or about March 28, 2008, Plaintiff amended his complaint to add as a
defendant the party which purchased Pacific Title & Art Studio from the Company and to add several
further causes of action. In his amended complaint, the former CEO made claims for compensatory
damages in excess of $24.6 million, plus exemplary and punitive damages and interest. In April
2008, the Company made a payment to the former CEO, through Pacific Title & Art Studio, in the
amount of approximately $2.4 million, net of applicable withholdings, representing amounts the
Company believes were owed to the plaintiff under his employment agreement and deferred stock
units. In September 2008, the former CEO and the defendants settled this matter. The Company
contributed $0.25 million to the amounts paid to the Plaintiff to settle this matter in addition to
amounts contributed by the Companys insurance carrier and the other defendants. This amount, plus
legal fees related to the settlement of this matter, was included within Loss from discontinued
operations for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
In October 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Musser, its former Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, to provide for annual payments of $0.7 million per year and certain
health care and other benefits for life. The related current liability of $0.8 million was included
in Accrued expenses and the long-term portion of $1.5 million was included in Other long-term
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2008.
The Company has agreements with certain employees that provide for severance payments to the
employee in the event the employee is terminated without cause or an employee terminates his
employment for good reason. The maximum aggregate exposure under the agreements was
approximately $8.0 million at September 30, 2008.
16. CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE AND CORRECTION OF AN IMMATERIAL ERROR IN PRIOR PERIODS
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company increased its ownership interest
in Authentium, Inc. (Authentium) to the 20.0% threshold at which the Company believes it
exercises significant influence. Accordingly, the Company adopted the equity method of accounting
for its holdings in Authentium. In accordance with APB 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for
Investments in Common Stock, the Company has adjusted the financial statements for prior periods
contained in this Form 10-Q to retrospectively apply the equity method of accounting for its
holdings in Authentium since the initial date of acquisition in April 2006. The effect of the
change was to decrease Ownership interests in and advances to partner companies by $1.5 million as
of December 31, 2007 and to increase Equity loss by $0.2 million, $0.7 million and $0.5 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2007, the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the six
months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, an accounting error at Clarient was identified. The error
related to Clarients accounting for customer refunds which affected the Companys previously
reported quarterly results in 2007 and 2006, totaling $0.8 million. In accordance with Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 108, the Companys management evaluated the materiality of the error from
qualitative and quantitative perspectives, and evaluated the quantified error under both the iron
curtain and the roll-over methods. Management concluded that the error was immaterial to prior
periods, but to remain consistent with revisions made to Clarients September 30, 2008 Form 10-Q,
the Company made such revisions to its Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein, as
summarized below.
24
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(unaudited)
The following tables summarize the effects of the adjustments on the Consolidated Financial
Statements as of December 31, 2007 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 as
contained in this Form 10-Q:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Previously |
|
As |
|
|
Reported (1) |
|
Revised |
Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership interests in and advances to partner companies |
|
$ |
91,538 |
|
|
$ |
90,038 |
|
Total Assets |
|
|
391,862 |
|
|
|
390,362 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(616,013 |
) |
|
|
(617,513 |
) |
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
154,639 |
|
|
|
153,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Previously |
|
As |
|
Previously |
|
As |
|
|
Reported (1) |
|
Revised |
|
Reported (1) |
|
Revised |
Statement of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
12,058 |
|
|
$ |
11,936 |
|
|
$ |
31,251 |
|
|
$ |
30,638 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(8,322 |
) |
|
|
(8,444 |
) |
|
|
(25,636 |
) |
|
|
(26,249 |
) |
Equity loss |
|
|
(4,169 |
) |
|
|
(4,407 |
) |
|
|
(9,348 |
) |
|
|
(10,054 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
3,933 |
|
|
|
4,181 |
|
Net loss from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
(15,312 |
) |
|
|
(15,622 |
) |
|
|
(34,199 |
) |
|
|
(35,270 |
) |
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(15,312 |
) |
|
|
(15,622 |
) |
|
|
(33,503 |
) |
|
|
(34,574 |
) |
Basic and diluted loss per share
from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Restated for discontinued operations. See Note 3. |
17.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On November 4, 2008, the Company received an official notice from the New York Stock
Exchange regarding its non-compliance with the Exchanges continued listing standards. The Company
received this notice because the average closing price of its common stock was less than $1.00 for
the thirty-day trading period ended November 3, 2008. The Company has a period of six months to
increase its common stock price above $1.00 and cure its non-compliance. At the Companys 2008
Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholders approved a reverse split of the Companys common
stock (within a range of split ratios) to be effected in the discretion of the Board of Directors.
It is the Companys intention to utilize a reverse split to cure its non-compliance if its common
stock continues to trade below $1.00. The specific timing and ratio of any such reverse split will
be determined based on a variety of considerations including, but not limited to, overall capital
market conditions, the Companys prevailing common stock price and the effect of any such reverse
split on the Companys public float. The Companys non-compliance does not affect its status with
the Securities and Exchange Commission or any of its material agreements.
25
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cautionary Note concerning Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that are based on
current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.
(Safeguard or we), the industries in which we operate and other matters, as well as
managements beliefs and assumptions and other statements regarding matters that are not historical
facts. These statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and
prospects. For example, when we use words such as projects, expects, anticipates, intends,
plans, believes, seeks, estimates, should, would, could, will, opportunity,
potential or may, variations of such words or other words that convey uncertainty of future
events or outcomes, we are making forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our
forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially, include, among others, managing rapidly changing technologies,
limited access to capital, competition, the ability to attract and retain qualified employees, the
ability to execute our strategy, the uncertainty of the future performance of our partner
companies, acquisitions and dispositions of companies, the inability to manage growth, compliance
with government regulation and legal liabilities, additional financing requirements, labor disputes
and the effect of economic conditions in the business sectors in which our partner companies
operate, all of which are discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in Safeguards Annual Report on Form
10-K and updated, as applicable, in Item 1A. Risk Factors below. Many of these factors are
beyond our ability to predict or control. In addition, as a result of these and other factors, our
past financial performance should not be relied on as an indication of future performance. All
forward-looking statements attributable to us, or to persons acting on our behalf, are expressly
qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. We undertake no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise, except as required by law. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the
forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this report might not occur.
Business Overview
Safeguards charter is to build value in growth-stage technology and life sciences businesses.
We provide capital as well as a range of strategic, operational and management resources to our
partner companies. Safeguard participates in expansion financings, corporate spin-outs, management
buy-outs, recapitalizations, industry consolidations and early-stage financings. Our vision is to
be the preferred catalyst for creating great technology and life sciences companies.
We strive to create long-term value for our shareholders by building value in our partner
companies. We help our partner companies to increase market penetration, grow revenue and improve
cash flow in order to create long-term value. We concentrate on companies that operate in two
categories:
Technology including companies focused on providing software as a service (SaaS),
technology-enabled services and vertical software solutions for the financial services sector,
internet-based businesses and healthcare information technology; and
Life Sciences including companies focused on molecular and point-of-care diagnostics,
medical devices and specialty pharmaceuticals.
Principles of Accounting for Ownership Interests in Partner Companies
We account for our interests in our partner companies and private equity funds using three
methods: consolidation, equity or cost. The accounting method applied is generally determined by
the degree of our influence over the entity, primarily determined by our voting interest in the
entity.
Consolidation Method. We account for our partner companies in which we directly or indirectly
own more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities using the consolidation method of
accounting. We reflect the participation of other partner company stockholders in the income or
losses of our consolidated partner companies as Minority Interest in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. Minority interest adjusts our consolidated operating results to reflect only our share
of the earnings or losses of the consolidated partner companies. If there is no minority interest
balance remaining on the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the respective partner company, we
record 100% of the consolidated partner companys losses; we record 100% of subsequent earnings of
the partner company to the extent of such previously recognized losses in excess of our
proportionate share.
Equity Method. We account for partner companies whose results are not consolidated, but over
whom we exercise significant influence, using the equity method of accounting. We also account for
our interests in some private equity funds
26
under the equity method of accounting, depending on our respective general and limited partner
interests. Under the equity method of accounting, our share of the income or loss of the company is
reflected in Equity Loss in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. We report our share of the
income or loss of the equity method partner companies on a one quarter lag.
When the carrying value of our holding in an equity method partner company is reduced to zero,
no further losses are recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Operations unless we have
outstanding guarantee obligations or have committed additional funding to the equity method partner
company. When the equity method partner company subsequently reports income, we will not record our
share of such income until it equals the amount of our share of losses not previously recognized.
Cost Method. We account for partner companies which are not consolidated or accounted for
under the equity method using the cost method of accounting. Under the cost method, our share of
the income or losses of such partner companies is not included in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations. However, the effect of the change in market value of cost method partner company
holdings classified as trading securities is reflected in Other income (loss), net in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Accounting policies, methods and estimates are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial
Statements prepared by management and are based upon managements current judgments. These
judgments are normally based on knowledge and experience with regard to past and current events and
assumptions about future events. Certain accounting policies, methods and estimates are
particularly important because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the
possibility that future events affecting them may differ from managements current judgments. While
there are a number of accounting policies, methods and estimates affecting our financial
statements, areas that are particularly significant include the following:
|
§ |
|
Revenue recognition; |
|
|
§ |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets; |
|
|
§ |
|
Goodwill impairment; |
|
|
§ |
|
Impairment of ownership interests in and advances to companies; |
|
|
§ |
|
Income taxes; |
|
|
§ |
|
Commitments and contingencies; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Stock-based compensation. |
Revenue Recognition
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, our revenue from
continuing operations was attributable to Clarient.
Revenue for Clarients diagnostic services is recognized at the time of completion of
services. Diagnostic services are billed to various payors, including Medicare, commercial
insurance companies and other directly-billed healthcare institutions such as hospitals and
individuals. Clarient reports revenue from contracted payors, including certain insurance companies
and certain healthcare institutions, based on the contracted rate, or in the case of Medicare, the
published fee schedules, net of contractual allowances. Clarient reports revenue from
non-contracted payors, including certain insurance companies and individuals, based on the amount
it expects to collect for services provided.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We test long-lived assets, including property and equipment and amortizable intangible assets,
for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that we may not be able to
recover the assets carrying amount. We evaluate the recoverability of an asset by comparing its
carrying amount to the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual
disposition of that asset. If the undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover the
carrying amount, we measure any impairment loss as the excess of the carrying amount of the asset
over its fair value.
The carrying value of net property and equipment at September 30, 2008 was $12.1 million.
27
Impairment of Goodwill
We conduct an annual review for impairment of goodwill as of December 1st and as otherwise
required by circumstances or events. Additionally, on an interim basis, we assess the impairment
of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances would more likely than not reduce the fair
value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Factors that we consider important which could
trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to historical or
expected future operating results, significant changes in the manner or use of the acquired assets
or the strategy for the overall business, significant negative industry or economic trends or a
decline in a companys stock price for a sustained period.
We test for impairment at a reporting unit level (which for us is the same as an operating
segment as defined in SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information). If we determine that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying
value, we assess whether goodwill of the reporting unit is impaired. To determine fair value, we
use a number of valuation methods including quoted market prices, discounted cash flows and public
company and acquisition multiples for comparable companies. Depending on the complexity of the
valuation and the significance of the carrying value of the goodwill to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, we may engage an outside valuation firm to assist us in determining fair value. As an
overall check on the reasonableness of the fair values attributed to our reporting units, we will
consider comparing the aggregate fair values for all reporting units with our average total market
capitalization for a reasonable period of time.
The carrying value of goodwill at September 30, 2008 was $12.7 million.
Our partner companies operate in industries which are rapidly evolving and extremely
competitive. It is reasonably possible that our accounting estimates with respect to the ultimate
recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill could change in the near term and that the effect
of such changes on our Consolidated Financial Statements could be material. While we believe that
the current recorded carrying value of our goodwill is not impaired, there can be no assurance that
a significant write-down or write-off will not be required in the future.
Impairment of Ownership Interests In and Advances to Companies
On a periodic basis (but no less frequently than at the end of each quarter) we evaluate the
carrying value of our equity and cost method partner companies for possible impairment based on
achievement of business plan objectives and milestones, the financial condition and prospects of
the company and other relevant factors. The business plan objectives and milestones we consider
include, among others, those related to financial performance, such as achievement of planned
financial results or completion of capital raising activities, and those that are not primarily
financial in nature, such as hiring of key employees or the establishment of strategic
relationships. We then determine whether there has been an other than temporary decline in the
value of our ownership interest in the company. Impairment to be recognized is measured as the
amount by which the carrying value of an asset exceeds its fair value.
The fair value of privately held partner companies is generally determined based on the value
at which independent third parties have invested or have committed to invest in these companies or
based on other valuation methods including discounted cash flows, valuation of comparable public
companies and the valuation of acquisitions of similar companies. The fair value of our ownership
interests in private equity funds is generally determined based on the value of our pro rata
portion of the funds net assets and estimated future proceeds from sales of investments provided
by the funds managers.
The new carrying value of a partner company is not increased if circumstances suggest the
value of the partner company has subsequently recovered.
Our partner companies generally operate in industries which are rapidly evolving and extremely
competitive. It is reasonably possible that our accounting estimates with respect to the ultimate
recoverability of the carrying value of ownership interests in and advances to companies could
change in the near term and that the effect of such changes on our Consolidated Financial
Statements could be material. While we believe that the current recorded carrying values of our
equity and cost method companies are not impaired, there can be no assurance that our future
results will confirm this assessment or that a significant write-down or write-off will not be
required in the future.
28
In the first quarter of 2008 we recognized an impairment loss of $3.6 million, which is
included within Loss from discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008. See Discontinued Operations below.
Income Taxes
We are required to estimate income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate.
This process involves estimating our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary
differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These
differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our
Consolidated Balance Sheets. We must assess the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be
recovered from future taxable income and to the extent that we believe recovery is not likely, we
must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance in a period,
we must include an expense within the tax provision in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We have recorded a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to an amount that is more
likely than not to be realized in future years. If we determine in the future that it is more
likely than not that the net deferred tax assets would be realized, then the previously provided
valuation allowance would be reversed.
Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, we are a defendant or plaintiff in various legal actions which arise in the
normal course of business. Additionally, we have received distributions as both a general partner
and a limited partner from certain private equity funds. In certain circumstances, we may be
required to return a portion or all the distributions we received as a general partner of a fund
for a further distribution to such funds limited partners (the clawback). We are also a
guarantor of various third-party obligations and commitments and are subject to the possibility of
various loss contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business. We are required to assess
the likelihood of any adverse outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable
losses. A determination of the amount of provision required for these commitments and
contingencies, if any, which would be charged to earnings, is made after careful analysis of each
matter. The provision may change in the future due to new developments or changes in
circumstances. Changes in the provision could increase or decrease our earnings in the period the
changes are made.
Stock-Based Compensation
On January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No.
123(R)). SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to measure all employee stock-based compensation
awards using a fair value method and record such expense in its consolidated financial statements.
We adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method. Accordingly, we have not
restated prior period amounts. Under this application, we are required to record compensation
expense for all awards granted after the date of adoption and for the unvested portion of
previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption.
We estimate the grant date fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model which requires the input of highly subjective assumptions. These assumptions include
estimating the expected term of the award and the estimated volatility of our stock price over the
expected term. Changes in these assumptions and in the estimated forfeitures of stock option awards
can materially affect the amount of stock-based compensation recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. The requisite service periods for market-based stock option awards are
based on our estimate of the dates on which the market conditions will be met as determined using a
Monte Carlo simulation model. Changes in the derived requisite service period or achievement of
market capitalization targets earlier than estimated can materially affect the amount of
stock-based compensation recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The requisite
service periods for performance-based awards are based on our best estimate of when the performance
conditions will be met. Compensation expense is recognized for performance-based awards for which
the performance condition is considered probable of achievement. Changes in the requisite service
period or the estimated probability of achievement of performance conditions can materially affect
the amount of stock-based compensation recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
29
Results of Operations
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we increased our ownership interest in
Authentium to the 20.0% threshold at which we believe we exercise significant influence.
Accordingly, we adopted the equity method of accounting for our holdings in Authentium. In
accordance with APB 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, we have
adjusted the financial statements for prior periods contained in this Form 10-Q to retrospectively
apply the equity method of accounting for our holdings in Authentium since the initial date of
acquisition in April 2006.
On May 6, 2008 the Company consummated the Bundle Transaction pursuant to which it sold all of
its equity and debt interests in Acsis, Alliance Consulting, Laureate Pharma, ProModel and
Neuronyx.
We present Clarient, our publicly traded consolidated partner company, as a separate segment.
The results of operations of our other partner companies in which we have less than a majority
interest are reported in our Life Sciences and Technology segments. The Life Sciences and
Technology segments also include the gain or loss on the sale of respective partner companies,
except for gains and losses included in discontinued operations.
Our management evaluates our Clarient segment performance based on revenue, operating income
(loss) and income (loss) before income taxes, which reflects the portion of income (loss) allocated
to minority shareholders. Our management evaluates our Life Sciences and Technology segments
performance based on their equity income (loss) which is based on the number of respective partner
companies accounted for under the equity method, the Companys voting ownership percentage in these
partner companies and the net results of operations of these partner companies and Other income or
loss associated with cost method partner companies.
Other Items include certain expenses, which are not identifiable to the operations of the
Companys operating business segments. Other Items primarily consist of general and administrative
expenses related to corporate operations, including employee compensation, insurance and
professional fees, including legal and finance, interest income, interest expense, other income
(loss) and equity income (loss) related to private equity holdings. Other Items also include
income taxes, which are reviewed by management independent of segment results.
The following tables reflect our consolidated operating data by reportable segment. Segment
results include the results of Clarient, our consolidated partner company, and our share of income
or losses for entities accounted for under the equity method when applicable. Segment results also
include impairment charges, gains or losses related to the disposition of partner companies, except
for those reported in discontinued operations, and the mark-to-market of trading securities. All
significant inter-segment activity has been eliminated in consolidation. Accordingly, segment
results reported by us exclude the effect of transactions between us and our consolidated partner
company.
Our operating results including net income (loss) before income taxes by segment were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Clarient |
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
$ |
(1,633 |
) |
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
$ |
(5,356 |
) |
Life Sciences |
|
|
(6,326 |
) |
|
|
(7,553 |
) |
|
|
(14,275 |
) |
|
|
(11,673 |
) |
Technology |
|
|
(1,968 |
) |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
(5,882 |
) |
|
|
(3,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segments |
|
|
(7,405 |
) |
|
|
(10,519 |
) |
|
|
(19,471 |
) |
|
|
(20,671 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate operations |
|
|
3,313 |
|
|
|
(5,103 |
) |
|
|
(3,938 |
) |
|
|
(14,599 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items |
|
|
3,343 |
|
|
|
(5,103 |
) |
|
|
(3,912 |
) |
|
|
(13,903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(4,062 |
) |
|
|
(15,622 |
) |
|
|
(23,383 |
) |
|
|
(34,574 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(1,136 |
) |
|
|
(8,738 |
) |
|
|
(9,236 |
) |
|
|
(15,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(5,198 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,360 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,619 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is intense competition in the markets in which our partner companies operate, and we
expect competition to intensify in the future. Additionally, the markets in which these companies
operate are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, frequent
introduction of new products and services, shifting distribution channels, evolving government
regulation, frequently changing intellectual property landscapes and changing customer demands.
Their
30
future success depends on each companys ability to execute its business plan and to adapt to
its respective rapidly changing markets.
Clarient
In connection with the audit of Clarients financial statements as of December 31, 2007 and
for the year then ended, Clarients independent auditors determined that there was substantial
doubt about Clarients ability to continue as a going concern. In January and February 2009,
respectively, Clarients revolving credit facility and its bank credit facility will expire, at
which time Clarient will need to extend, renew or refinance such debt and possibly secure
additional debt or equity financing in order to fund anticipated working capital needs and capital
expenditures and to execute its strategy. Clarients management believes that its current cash
resources, revenue from operations and commitments under its credit facilities will enable Clarient
to maintain current operations through at least the next twelve months and fund anticipated capital
expenditures and implementation of its strategy. See Liquidity and Capital Resources
Consolidated Partner Company below.
The financial information presented below does not include the results of operations of
Clarients ACIS technology group, which is included in discontinued operations for all periods
presented. Clarient sold this business for cash proceeds of $11.0 million, excluding contingent
purchase price of $1.5 million. In 2007, prior to its sale, the technology group generated revenue
of $0.8 million and net loss from operations of $0.6 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
18,997 |
|
|
$ |
11,936 |
|
|
$ |
51,799 |
|
|
$ |
30,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
7,172 |
|
|
|
5,757 |
|
|
|
20,175 |
|
|
|
16,373 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
11,668 |
|
|
|
8,753 |
|
|
|
33,380 |
|
|
|
22,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
18,840 |
|
|
|
14,510 |
|
|
|
53,555 |
|
|
|
39,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
(2,574 |
) |
|
|
(1,756 |
) |
|
|
(8,640 |
) |
Other loss, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
(642 |
) |
|
|
(897 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
|
|
4,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
$ |
(1,633 |
) |
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
$ |
(5,356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clarient is a comprehensive cancer diagnostics company providing cellular assessment and
cancer characterization to community pathologists, academic researchers, university hospitals and
biopharmaceutical companies.
The decision to provide in-house laboratory services was made in 2004 to give Clarient an
opportunity to capture a significant service-related revenue stream over the much broader and
expanding cancer diagnostic testing marketplace. Clarient believes it is well positioned to
participate in this growth due to its strength as a cancer diagnostics laboratory, deep domain
expertise and access to intellectual property which can contribute to the development of additional
tests, unique analytical capabilities and other service offerings.
Clarient operates primarily in one business, the delivery of critical oncology testing
services to community pathologists, biopharmaceutical companies and other researchers.
As of September 30, 2008, we owned a 58.1% voting interest in Clarient.
Three months ended September 30, 2008 versus the three months ended September 30, 2007
Revenue. Revenue of $19.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased
59.1% or $7.1 million from $11.9 million for the prior year period. Clarients increased revenue
resulted from the effective execution of its commercial operations strategy which includes
expanding the cancer diagnostic services that it provides to its existing customers, while also
actively adding new customers. Clarient provided services to 73 new customers during the three
months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to providing services to 53 new customers during the
three months ended September 30, 2007.
31
During the first quarter of 2008 Clarient expanded the breadth of its diagnostic services to
include cancer markers for tumors of the colon, prostate and lung. Clarient expects to steadily
increase its menu of diagnostic services to include cancer markers for additional tumor types and
to deepen its market penetration for the diagnostic services that it currently provides. A number of recently published clinical findings have promoted
the use of certain biomarkers to predict patient response to a class of colorectal cancer drugs that are
focused on blocking the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway. Clarients
ability to perform tests such as K-ras (a newly emerging biomarker) to outline alterations in this major pathway is therefore
becoming a more recognized tool in the medical community for predicting an individuals response to
drug therapies for colorectal cancers. Clarient has also steadily increased the depth of its
diagnostic services for certain cancer types that it has previously provided, including
lymphoma/leukemia. Clarients expanding capabilities in immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry,
fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and its marketing
of such capabilities, has enabled Clarients revenue growth. Clarient anticipates that its favorable
revenue trend will continue as it further executes its operational strategy of expanding the breadth and depth
of its cancer diagnostic services, and the means by which its services are marketed and delivered
to its customers.
Another contributor to revenue growth has been an overall increase in Medicare reimbursement
rates which include cancer diagnostic services, effective January 1, 2008. In addition, many of the
third-party contract rates are based upon Medicare rates, which consequently, also increased. In
July 2008, the Medicare rate increase that initially took effect as of January 1, 2008 was extended 18 months, through
December 31, 2009.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was $7.2 million
compared to $5.8 million in the prior year period, an increase of 24.6%. The $1.4 million increase
was driven by an overall increase in revenue, and was primarily due to additional laboratory personnel costs of $0.1 million, increased laboratory
reagents and supplies expense of $0.4 million, increased cost of tests performed by other
laboratories of $0.5 million and an increase in shipping expense of $0.4 million.
Gross margin in the third quarter of 2008 was 62.2% compared to 51.8% in the prior year
period. The increase in gross margin was primarily driven by an overall increase in revenue,
including a more favorable mix of cancer diagnostic services that absorbed a greater proportion of
fixed and semi-fixed costs as compared to the prior year period. In addition, employee
productivity continues to improve and Clarient has also realized greater economies of scale in
operations with its business growth as compared to the prior year period. Clarient anticipates
that gross margins will modestly improve as its testing volume increases, and Clarient more
effectively utilizes its operating capacity and more efficiently manages its operations. If the
present Medicare reimbursement rates are decreased after December 31, 2009, gross margins could be
adversely impacted.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses in the
third quarter of 2008 were $11.7 million, an increase of approximately $2.9 million, or 33.3%,
compared to $8.8 million in the prior year period. As a percentage of revenue, these expenses
decreased to 61.4% in the third quarter of 2008 compared to 73.3% in
the prior year period, primarily due to the fixed and semi-fixed
nature of certain selling, general and administrative expenses. The
$2.9 million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in the third quarter of 2008
as compared to the prior year period was primarily due to an increase
in bad debt expense of $3.3 million. During the third quarter of
2008, Clarient increased its allowance for doubtful accounts due to
the deterioration in the aging of a portion of its accounts
receivable. Clarient
anticipates that selling expenses will continue to grow in proportion to
expected revenue growth. Clarient expects that billing expenses will be reduced as a result of bringing its billing
system in-house and bad debt expense as a percentage of revenue will also decline due to
improvement in the timeliness of its billings and improved information flow. In addition, Clarient
expects that other general and administrative expenses will be reduced as a result of a targeted
cost reduction program. As a result, Clarient expects that general and administrative expenses will
decline in proportion to expected revenue growth.
Interest, Net. Interest expense, net, was $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Interest expense relates to borrowings under the
credit arrangements with certain third party lenders. The decrease is due to the decrease in the
level of outstanding third party borrowings
Nine Months ended September 30, 2008 versus the Nine Months ended September 30, 2007
Revenue. Revenue of $51.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased
69.1% or $21.2 million from $30.6 million for the prior year period. The increase resulted from
the effective execution of Clarients commercial operations strategy which includes expanding the
cancer diagnostic services that are provided to existing customers, while also actively adding new
customers. Clarient provided services to 172 new customers during the nine months ended September
30, 2008, as compared to providing services to 153 new customers during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $20.2 million
compared to $16.4 million in the prior year period, an increase of 23.2%. The $3.8 million
increase was driven by an overall increase in revenue, and was primarily due to additional
32
laboratory personnel costs of $0.4 million, increased laboratory reagents and supplies expense
of $0.8 million, increased cost of tests performed by other laboratories of $1.6 million and an
increase in shipping expense of $1.0 million.
Gross margin in the first nine months of 2008 was 61.1% compared to 46.6% in the prior year
period. The increase in gross margin was primarily driven by an overall increase in revenue,
including a more favorable mix of cancer diagnostic services that absorbed a greater proportion of
fixed and semi-fixed costs as compared to the prior year period. In addition, employee
productivity continues to improve and Clarient has also realized greater economies of scale in
operations with its business growth as compared to the prior year period.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 were $33.4 million, an increase of approximately $10.5 million, or
45.7%, compared to $22.9 million in the prior year period. As a percentage of revenue, these
expenses decreased to 64.4% in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 74.8% in the
prior year period. The $10.5 million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as
compared to the prior year period was primarily due to an increase in bad debt expense of $6.0 million, an increase in employee severance costs of
$0.2 million, an increase in sales and administrative payroll and training costs of $2.4 million,
an increase in professional fees of $1.0 million,
an increase in depreciation expense of $0.4 million and an increase in facilities-related expenses
of $0.4 million.
Interest, Net. Interest expense, net, was $0.6 million and $0.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Interest expense relates to borrowings under
credit arrangements with certain third party lenders. The decrease is due to the decrease in the
level of outstanding third party borrowings.
Life Sciences
The following partner companies were included in Life Sciences during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner Company |
|
Safeguard Ownership |
|
Accounting Method |
Advanced BioHealing, Inc. |
|
|
28.3 |
% |
|
Equity method |
Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
Cost method |
Alverix, Inc. |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
Equity method |
Cellumen, Inc. |
|
|
40.6 |
% |
|
Equity method |
NuPathe, Inc. |
|
|
23.4 |
% |
|
Equity method |
Rubicor Medical, Inc. |
|
|
35.7 |
% |
|
Equity method |
Yet-to-be-announced company |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
|
Equity method |
The following partner companies were included in Life Sciences during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner Company |
|
Safeguard Ownership |
|
Accounting Method |
Advanced BioHealing, Inc. |
|
|
28.3 |
% |
|
Equity method |
Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
Cost method |
Cellumen, Inc. |
|
|
40.3 |
% |
|
Equity method |
Neuronyx, Inc. |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
Cost method |
NuPathe, Inc. |
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
Equity method |
Rubicor Medical, Inc. |
|
|
35.7 |
% |
|
Equity method |
Ventaira Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
Cost method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Other loss |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,531 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,331 |
) |
Equity loss |
|
$ |
(6,326 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,022 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,275 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income taxes |
|
$ |
(6,326 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,553 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,275 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
Equity Loss. Equity loss fluctuates with the number of Life Sciences partner companies
accounted for under the equity method, our voting ownership percentage in these partner companies
and the net results of operations of these partner companies. We recognize our share of losses to
the extent we have cost basis in the equity partner company or we have outstanding commitments or
guarantees. Certain amounts recorded to reflect our share of the income or losses of our partner
companies accounted for under the equity method are based on estimates and on unaudited results of
operations of those partner companies and may require adjustments in the future when audits of
these entities are made final. We report our share of the results of our equity method partner
companies on a one quarter lag basis. Equity loss for Life Sciences increased $3.3 million and
$7.9 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to the
prior year periods. Included in equity loss for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, was expense of $2.3 million associated with acquired in-process research and development
related to our acquisition of a 37% interest in a yet-to-be-announced Life Sciences partner
company. The increase in equity loss was also due to an increase in the number of equity method
partner companies, each of which generated losses, and larger losses incurred at certain partner
companies. Other loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 reflects an
impairment charge for Ventaira Pharmaceuticals, Inc. We expect to recognize a $1.3 million charge
in the fourth quarter of 2008, related to an in-process research and development charge recorded by
NuPathe.
Technology
The following partner companies were included in Technology during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner Company |
|
Safeguard Ownership |
|
Accounting Method |
Advantedge Healthcare Solutions, Inc. |
|
|
37.7 |
% |
|
Equity method |
Authentium, Inc. |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
Equity method (1) |
Beyond.com, Inc. |
|
|
37.1 |
% |
|
Equity method |
Bridgevine, Inc. |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
Equity method |
Kadoo, Inc. |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
Cost method |
GENBAND Inc. |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
Cost method |
Portico Systems, Inc. |
|
|
46.8 |
% |
|
Equity method |
Swaptree, Inc. |
|
|
29.3 |
% |
|
Equity method |
The following partner companies were included in Technology during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner Company |
|
Safeguard Ownership |
|
Accounting Method |
Advantedge Healthcare Solutions, Inc. |
|
|
35.2 |
% |
|
Equity method |
Authentium, Inc. |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
Equity method (1) |
Beyond.com, Inc. |
|
|
37.1 |
% |
|
Equity method |
NexTone, Inc. (now GENBAND) |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
Cost method |
Portico Systems, Inc. |
|
|
46.9 |
% |
|
Equity method |
ProModel Corporation |
|
|
49.7 |
% |
|
Equity method |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we increased our ownership interest in
Authentium to the 20.0% threshold at which we believe we exercise significant influence.
Accordingly, we adopted the equity method of accounting for our holdings in Authentium. In
accordance with APB 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, we have
adjusted the financial statements for prior periods contained in this Form 10-Q to retrospectively
apply the equity method of accounting for our holdings in Authentium since the initial date of
acquisition in April 2006. |
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Equity loss |
|
$ |
(1,968 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,333 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,882 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income taxes |
|
$ |
(1,968 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,333 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,882 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Loss. Equity loss fluctuates with the number of Technology partner companies accounted
for under the equity method, our voting ownership percentage in these partner companies and the net
results of operations of these partner companies. We recognize our share of losses to the extent
we have cost basis in the equity partner company or we have outstanding commitments or guarantees.
Certain amounts recorded to reflect our share of the income or losses of our partner companies
accounted for under the equity method are based on estimates and on unaudited results of operations
of those partner companies and may require adjustments in the future when audits of these entities
are made final. We report our share of the results of our equity method partner companies on a one
quarter lag. Equity loss for Technology increased $0.6 million and $2.2 million in the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to the prior year periods. The
increase was due to an increase in the number of equity method partner companies each of which
generated losses, and larger losses incurred at certain partner companies.
Corporate Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
General and administrative costs, net |
|
$ |
(3,562 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,013 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,414 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,555 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
(612 |
) |
|
|
(811 |
) |
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
|
|
(2,905 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(149 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
6,023 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(999 |
) |
|
|
(1,056 |
) |
|
|
(3,106 |
) |
|
|
(3,166 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
7,685 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
10,312 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
Equity (loss) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,313 |
|
|
$ |
(5,103 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,938 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008 versus the three months ended September 30, 2007
General and Administrative Costs. Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily
of employee compensation, insurance, outside services such as legal, accounting and travel-related
costs. General and administrative costs decreased $1.5 million as compared to the prior year
period. The decrease is primarily attributable to a $0.5 million decrease in employee costs and a
severance charge of $0.6 million in the third quarter of 2007.
Stock-Based Compensation. Stock-based compensation consists primarily of expense related to
stock option grants and grants of restricted stock and deferred stock units to our employees. The
$0.2 million decrease relates to higher expense in the prior year period due to the acceleration of
stock-based compensation expense related to the market-based stock options. Stock-based
compensation expense related to corporate operations is included in selling, general and
administrative in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Interest Income. Interest income includes all interest earned on available cash and marketable
security balances. Interest income decreased $0.9 million in the third quarter of 2008 compared to
the prior year period due to a decrease in interest rate returns and a decrease in average invested
cash balances.
Interest Expense. Interest expense is primarily related to our 2.625% convertible senior
debentures with a stated maturity of 2024. Interest expense remained consistent in the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the prior year periods.
Other income. Other income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily
related to a net gain of $7.6 million on the repurchase of $38 million in face value of the 2024
debentures.
35
Equity (loss). Equity (loss) was from our equity (loss) for private equity holdings accounted
for under the equity method.
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 versus the nine months ended September 30, 2007
General and Administrative Costs. Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily
of employee compensation, insurance, outside services such as legal, accounting and travel-related
costs. General and administrative costs decreased $2.1 million as compared to the prior year
period. The decrease is primarily attributable to a $0.8 million decrease in employee costs, a
$0.8 million decrease in professional fees, and a severance charge of $0.6 million in the third
quarter of 2007.
Stock-Based Compensation. Stock-based compensation consists primarily of expense related to
stock option grants and grants of restricted stock and deferred stock units to our employees. The
$1.8 million decrease relates to stock option forfeitures during the period and higher expense in
the prior year period due to the acceleration of stock-based compensation expense related to the
market-based stock options. Stock based compensation expense related to corporate operations is
included in selling, general and administrative in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Interest Income. Interest income includes all interest earned on available cash and marketable
security balances. Interest income decreased $3.4 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2008 compared to the prior year period due to a decrease in interest rate returns on lower average
invested cash balances.
Interest Expense. Interest expense is primarily related to our 2.625% convertible senior
debentures with a stated maturity of 2024. Interest expense remained consistent in the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the prior year periods.
Other income. Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is primarily related
to a net gain of $7.6 million on the repurchase of $38 million in face value of the 2024 debentures
and a $1.7 million net gain on the sale of companies, including the receipt of escrowed funds from
a legacy asset.
Equity (loss). Equity (loss) was from our equity (loss) for private equity holdings accounted
for under the equity method.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax benefit for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $30 thousand and
$26 thousand, respectively. Consolidated income tax benefit was $696 thousand for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007. We have recorded a valuation allowance to reduce our net deferred tax
asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized in future years. Accordingly, the
benefit of the net operating loss that would have been recognized in each period was offset by a
valuation allowance The net tax benefit recognized in each period resulted from the reversal of
reserves that related to uncertain tax positions for which the statute of limitations expired
during the period in the applicable tax jurisdictions.
Discontinued Operations
Of the companies included in the Bundle Transaction, Acsis, Alliance Consulting and Laureate
Pharma were majority-owned partner companies; Neuronyx and ProModel were minority-owned partner
companies. The Bundle Transaction was consummated on May 6, 2008. We have presented the results
of operations of Acsis, Alliance Consulting and Laureate Pharma as discontinued operations for all
periods presented. The gross proceeds from the Bundle Transaction were $74.5 million, of which
$6.4 million is to be held in escrow through April 2009, plus amounts advanced to certain of the
Bundle Companies during the time between the signing of the Bundle Transaction agreement and its
consummation. In the first quarter of 2008, we recognized an impairment loss of $3.6 million to
write down the aggregate carrying value of the Bundle Companies to the total proceeds, less
estimated costs to complete the Bundle Transaction. In the second quarter of 2008, we recorded a
charge of $0.9 million in discontinued operations to accrue for severance payments due to the
former CEO of Alliance Consulting in connection with the Bundle Transaction and we recorded a
pre-tax gain on disposal of $1.4 million.
36
In March 2007, we sold Pacific Title & Art Studio for net cash proceeds of approximately $21.9
million, including $2.3 million cash to be held in escrow. As a result of the sale, we recorded a
pre-tax gain of $2.7 million in the first quarter of 2007. During the three months and nine months
ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded a loss of $1.1 million and $1.6 million,
respectively, which is included in discontinued operations. These amounts related to additional
compensation paid to the former CEO of Pacific Title & Art Studio in connection with the March 2007
sale and related legal fees. Pacific Title & Art Studio is reported in discontinued operations for
all periods presented.
On March 8, 2007, Clarient sold its ACIS technology group for net cash proceeds of $11.0
million (excluding $1.5 million in contingent purchase price). As a result of the sale, Clarient
recorded a pre-tax gain of $3.6 million in the first quarter of 2007. The ACIS technology group is
reported in discontinued operations for all periods presented.
The loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the first nine months of 2008 of $9.2
million was primarily attributable to the $3.6 million impairment loss recorded in the first
quarter of 2008 related to the Bundle Transaction, the 2008 operating results of Acsis, Alliance
Consulting and Laureate Pharma through May 6, 2008 and expenses for additional compensation paid
to the former CEO of Pacific Title & Art Studio and related legal fees. The loss from discontinued
operations in the first nine months of 2007 of $15.8 million was primarily attributable to the loss
from operations of Acsis, Alliance Consulting and Laureate Pharma, partially offset by the gain on
sale of Pacific Title & Art Studio and the gain on sale of Clarients ACIS technology group.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Parent Company
We fund our operations with cash on hand as well as proceeds from sales of and distributions
from partner companies, private equity funds and marketable securities. In prior periods, we have
also used sales of our equity and issuance of debt as sources of liquidity and may do so in the
future. Our ability to generate liquidity from sales of partner companies, sales of marketable
securities and from equity and debt issuances has been adversely affected from time to time by
adverse circumstances in the U.S. capital markets and other factors.
As of September 30, 2008, at the parent company level, we had $46.3 million of cash and cash
equivalents and $60.8 million of marketable securities for a total of $107.1 million. In addition
to the amounts above, we had $2.0 million in escrow associated with our interest payments due on
our 2024 Debentures through March 2009, $6.9 million of cash held in escrow, including accrued
interest, and Clarient, our consolidated partner company, had cash and cash equivalents of $1.9
million.
The Bundle Transaction closed on May 6, 2008. Gross proceeds were $74.5 million in cash, of
which $6.4 million is to be held in escrow through April 2009, plus amounts advanced to certain of
the Bundle Companies during the time between the signing of the Bundle Transaction agreement and
its consummation. Guarantees of partner company facilities of $31.5 million were eliminated upon
the closing of the Bundle Transaction.
In April 2008, we received net cash proceeds of $20.5 million that were released from escrow
related to our October 2006 sale of Mantas, Inc. and in September 2008, we received $1.8 million
cash proceeds that were released from escrow related to our March 2009 sale of Pacific Title & Art
Studio.
In February 2004, we completed the sale of the 2024 Debentures. At September 30, 2008, we had
$91.0 million in face value of the 2024 Debentures outstanding. Interest on the 2024 Debentures is
payable semi-annually. At the holders option, the 2024 Debentures are convertible into our common
stock before the close of business on March 14, 2024 subject to certain conditions. The conversion
rate of the 2024 Debentures is $7.2174 of principal amount per share. The closing price of our
common stock on September 30, 2008 was $1.25. The 2024 Debentures holders have the right to
require repurchase of the 2024 Debentures on March 21, 2011, March 20, 2014 or March 20, 2019 at a
repurchase price equal to 100% of their respective face amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The 2024 Debentures holders also have the right to require repurchase of the 2024 Debentures upon
certain events, including sale of all or substantially all of our common stock or assets,
liquidation, dissolution or a change in control. Subject to certain conditions, we have the right
to redeem all or some of the 2024 Debentures commencing March 20, 2009. During the third quarter
2008, the Company repurchased $38.0 million in face value of the 2024 debentures for $30.0 million
in cash, including accrued interest. In connection with the repurchase, the Company recorded $0.4
million of expense related to the acceleration of deferred debt issuance costs associated with the
2024 debentures, resulting in a net gain of $7.6 million which was included in other income.
During 2006, we repurchased $21.0 million in face value of the 2024 Debentures for $16.4 million in
cash, including accrued interest.
37
On May 2, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized us, from time to time and depending on
market conditions, to repurchase shares of our outstanding common stock, with up to an aggregate
value of $10.0 million, exclusive of fees and commissions. These repurchases, as well as any
repurchases of 2024 Debentures, have and will be made in open market or privately negotiated
transactions in compliance with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and other applicable
legal requirements. The manner, timing and amount of any purchases have and will be determined by
us based upon an evaluation of market conditions, stock price and other factors. Our Board of
Directors authorizations regarding common stock and 2024 Debenture repurchases do not obligate us
to acquire any particular amount of common stock or 2024 Debentures and may be modified or
suspended at any time at our discretion. During the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, we repurchased approximately 813 thousand and 975 thousand shares of common stock at a cost
of $1.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
We maintain a revolving credit facility that provides for borrowings and issuances of letters
of credit and guarantees up to $30.0 million. This revolving credit facility expires on June 29,
2009. Borrowing availability under the facility is reduced by the amounts outstanding for our
borrowings and letters of credit and amounts guaranteed under Clarients facility maintained with
that same lender. This credit facility bears interest at the prime rate (5.0% at September 30,
2008) for outstanding borrowings. The credit facility is subject to an unused commitment fee of
0.125% per annum, which is subject to reduction based on deposits maintained at the bank. The
credit facility requires us to maintain an unrestricted cash collateral account at that same bank,
equal to our borrowings and letters of credit and amounts borrowed by Clarient under the guaranteed
portion of its facility maintained with that same bank. At September 30, 2008, the required cash
collateral, pursuant to the credit facility agreement was $18.6 million, which amount is included
within Cash and cash equivalents on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2008.
Availability under our revolving credit facility at September 30, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Size of facility |
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
Guaranty of Clarients facility at same bank (a) |
|
|
(12,300 |
) |
Outstanding letter of credit (b) |
|
|
(6,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amount available at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
11,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Companys ability to borrow under its credit facility is limited by the amounts
outstanding for the Companys borrowings and letters of credit and amounts guaranteed under
Clarients facility maintained at the same bank. |
|
(b) |
|
In connection with the sale of CompuCom in 2004, we provided a letter of credit, to the
landlord of CompuComs Dallas headquarters which letter of credit will expire on March 19,
2019, in an amount equal to $6.3 million. |
We have committed capital of approximately $7.7 million, including conditional commitments to
provide non-consolidated partner companies with additional funding and commitments made to various
private equity funds in prior years. These commitments will be funded over the next several years,
including approximately $7.5 million which is expected to be funded in the next 12 months. We do
not intend to commit to new investments in additional private equity funds and may seek to further
reduce our current ownership interests in, and our existing commitments to, the funds in which we
hold interests.
The transactions we enter into in pursuit of our strategy could increase or decrease our
liquidity at any point in time. As we seek to acquire interests in technology and life sciences
companies or provide additional funding to existing partner companies, we may be required to expend
our cash or incur debt, which will decrease our liquidity. Conversely, as we dispose of our
interests in partner companies from time-to-time, we may receive proceeds from such sales which
could increase our liquidity. From time to time, we are engaged in discussions concerning
acquisitions and dispositions which, if consummated, could impact our liquidity, perhaps
significantly.
In May 2001, we entered into a $26.5 loan agreement with Warren V. Musser, our former Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer. In December 2006, we restructured the obligation to reduce the amount
outstanding to $14.8 million, bearing interest rate of 5.0% per annum. Cash payments, when
received, are recognized as Recovery-related party in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Since 2001 and through September 30, 2008 we received a total of $16.3 million in cash payments on
the loan, of which $3 thousand was received during the first nine months of 2008. The carrying
value of the loan at September 30, 2008 was zero.
38
We have received distributions as both a general partner and a limited partner from certain
private equity funds. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to return a portion or all
the distributions we received as a general partner of a fund for further distribution to such
funds limited partners (the clawback). The maximum clawback we could be required to return for
our general partner interest is $3.6 million, of which $1.1 million was reflected in accrued
expenses and other current liabilities and $2.5 million was reflected in Other long-term
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2008.
Our previous ownership in the general partners of the funds which have potential clawback
liabilities ranges from 19-30%. The clawback liability is joint and several, such that we may be
required to fund the clawback for other general partners should they default. The funds have taken
several steps to reduce the potential liabilities should other general partners default, including
withholding all general partner distributions and placing them in escrow and adding rights of
set-off among certain funds. We believe our potential liability due to the possibility of default
by other general partners is remote.
For the reasons we presented above, we believe our cash and cash equivalents at September 30,
2008, availability under our revolving credit facility and other internal sources of cash flow will
be sufficient to fund our cash requirements for at least the next 12 months, including commitments
to our existing companies and funds, possible additional funding of existing partner companies and
our general corporate requirements. Our acquisition of new partner company interests is always
contingent upon our availability of cash to fund such deployments, and our timing of monetization
events directly affects our availability of cash.
Consolidated Partner Company
Clarient, our consolidated partner company, incurred losses in 2007 and the first nine months
of 2008 and may need additional capital to fund their operations. From time-to-time, Clarient may
require additional debt or equity financing or credit support from us to fund planned expansion
activities. If we decide not to, or cannot provide sufficient capital resources to allow them to
reach a positive cash flow position, and they are unable to raise capital from outside resources,
they may need to scale back their operations. As described below, we have renewed, expanded and
extended a revolving line of credit to Clarient. Alliance Consulting, Acsis and Laureate Pharma
were among the Bundle Companies sold on May 6, 2008 as part of the Bundle Transaction. We will not
have any continuing involvement with the funding requirements of these companies.
Clarient maintains a credit facility with its bank that provides for borrowings of up to $12.0
million. This facility contains financial and non-financial covenants and matures February 26,
2009.
On July 31, 2008, Clarient entered into a separate $8.0 million secured revolving credit
facility. Actual availability under the facility is limited by Clarients qualified accounts
receivable and certain liquidity factors. Clarient reduced indebtedness to us under the Mezzanine
Facility (defined below) with a portion of the proceeds borrowed under the revolving credit
facility.
In March 2007, we provided a subordinated revolving credit line (the Mezzanine Facility) to
Clarient. Under the Mezzanine Facility, we committed to provide Clarient access to up to $12.0
million in working capital funding, which was reduced to $6.0 million as a result of the ACIS Sale.
The Mezzanine Facility originally had a term expiring on December 8, 2008. On March 14, 2008, the
Mezzanine Facility was extended through April 15, 2009 and increased from $6.0 million to $21.0
million. In connection with the extension and increase of the Mezzanine Facility, we received from
Clarient five-year warrants to purchase shares of Clarient common stock with an exercise price of
$0.01 per share. We received 1.6 million of these warrants at the time of the extension of the
Mezzanine Facility and we received an additional 1.7 million warrants through September 2, 2008
based on the amount of borrowings remaining outstanding under the Mezzanine Facility at certain
interim dates. The Mezzanine Facility is subject to reduction to $6.0 million under certain
circumstances involving the completion of replacement financing by Clarient. At September 30,
2008, $10.4 million was outstanding under the Mezzanine Facility.
In September 2006, Clarient entered into a $5.0 million senior secured revolving credit
agreement with a third party lender. Borrowing availability under the agreement was based on the
amount of Clarients qualified accounts receivable, less certain reserves. The agreement bore
interest at variable rates based on the lower of 30-day LIBOR plus 3.25% or the prime rate plus
0.5%. On March 17, 2008, Clarient borrowed $4.6 million under the Mezzanine Facility to repay and
terminate this facility, and borrowed $2.8 million under the Mezzanine Facility to repay and
terminate its equipment line of credit with the same lender.
In connection with the audit of Clarients financial statements as of December 31, 2007 and
for the year then ended, Clarients independent auditors determined that there was substantial
doubt about Clarients ability to continue as a going
39
concern. In February 2009, Clarients bank credit facility in the amount of $12.0 million
will expire, at which time Clarient will need to extend, renew or refinance such debt and possibly
secure additional debt or equity financing in order to fund anticipated working capital needs and
capital expenditures and to execute its strategy. Clarient management believes that its current
cash resources, revenue from operations and commitments under its credit facilities will enable
Clarient to maintain current operations and fund anticipated capital expenditures and
implementation of its strategy.
Analysis of Parent Company Cash Flows
Cash flow activity for the Parent Company was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(11,504 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,214 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(5,679 |
) |
|
|
59,612 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(31,181 |
) |
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(48,364 |
) |
|
$ |
46,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Used In Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities decreased $1.7 million. The change was primarily related to
working capital changes.
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities increased by $65.3 million. The increase was primarily
related to an increase in cash used to purchase marketable securities of $153.8, an increase in
cash used for advances to companies of $12.3 million offset by a $64.9 increase in the proceeds
from the sale of discontinued operations and a decrease of $37.7 million in cash used in
acquisitions of ownership interests in partner companies and funds.
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations for the nine month period ended September 30,
2008 includes net cash proceeds of $65.7 million from the sale of Acsis, Alliance Consulting and
Laureate as part of the Bundle Sale, excluding amounts held in escrow, $20.5 million net proceeds
released from escrow related to our October 2006 sale of Mantas, Inc. and $1.8 million proceeds
released from escrow related to the March 2007 sale of Pacific Title & Art Studio, partially offset
by $3.7 million paid to the former CEO of Pacific Title & Art Studio in connection with the March
2007 sale including related legal fees. Included in the net cash used in investing activities in
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $3.0 million we paid related to our estimated clawback
liabilities.
Net Cash (Used In) Provided By Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities increased $31.8 million primarily due to the $30.0
million repurchase of the convertible senior debentures and $1.3 million purchases of treasury
stock.
Consolidated Working Capital from Continuing Operations
Consolidated working capital from continuing operations, excluding assets held for sale was
$106.4 million at September 30, 2008, an increase of $10.7 million compared to December 31, 2007.
The increase was primarily due to proceeds from the Bundle Sale (see Note 3).
40
Analysis of Consolidated Company Cash Flows
Cash flow activity was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(17,696 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,153 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(2,372 |
) |
|
|
62,113 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(26,887 |
) |
|
|
16,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(46,955 |
) |
|
$ |
46,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities decreased $14.5 million in the first nine months of 2008
compared to the prior year period. The decrease was primarily related to working capital changes
and a decrease in cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations.
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities increased by $64.5 million. The increase was primarily
related to an increase in cash used to purchase marketable securities of $153.8 million, an
increase in cash used for advances to companies of $3.8 million offset by a $54.0 million increase
in the proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations, a decrease of $34.7 million in cash used
in acquisitions of ownership interests in partner companies and funds and a $3.4 million decrease
in cash used in investing activities by discontinued operations.
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations for the nine-month period ended September 30,
2008 includes net cash proceeds of $65.7 million from the sale of Acsis, Alliance Consulting and
Laureate as part of the Bundle Sale, excluding amounts held in escrow, and $20.5 million net
proceeds released from escrow related to our October 2006 sale of Mantas, Inc. and $1.8 million
proceeds released from escrow related to the March 2007 sale of Pacific Title & Art Studio,
partially offset by $3.7 million paid to the former CEO of Pacific Title & Art Studio in connection
with the March 2007 sale.
Included in the net cash provided by investing activities in the nine months ended September
30, 2008 was $3.0 million we paid related to our estimated clawback liabilities.
Net Cash (Used In) Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities increased $43.1 million primarily due to the $30.0
million repurchase of the convertible senior debentures, decrease in net borrowings on revolving
credit facilities of $4.7 million, a $1.3 million purchase of treasury stock and a
decrease of $6.8 million in cash flows provided by financing activities of discontinued operations.
41
Contractual Cash Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and other commercial commitments
related to continuing operations as of September 30, 2008 by period due or expiration of the
commitment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
2009 and |
|
|
2011 and |
|
|
Due after |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Cash Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit (a) |
|
$ |
14.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital leases |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior debentures (b) |
|
|
91.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91.0 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Funding commitments (c) |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential clawback liabilities (d) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term obligations (e) |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations |
|
$ |
134.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
96.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
2009 and |
|
|
2011 and |
|
|
Due after |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Other Commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit (f) |
|
$ |
9.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Clarient maintains a credit facility with a bank which we guarantee.
Outstanding borrowings under the credit facility amounted to $9.0 million
at September 30, 2008. In addition, Clarient had $5.4 million outstanding
at September 30, 2008 under a senior secured revolving credit agreement
which is secured by Clarients accounts receivable and related assets.
Guarantees of $31.5 million were eliminated upon the closing of the Bundle
Transaction. |
|
(b) |
|
In February 2004, we completed the issuance of $150.0 million in face value
of the 2024 Debentures with a stated maturity of March 15, 2024. During
the third quarter of 2008 and during 2006, we repurchased $38.0 million and
$21.0 million, respectively, in face value of the 2024 Debentures. The
2024 Debenture holders have the right to require us to repurchase the 2024
Debentures on March 21, 2011, March 20, 2014 or March 20, 2019 at a
repurchase price equal to 100% of their respective face amount, plus
accrued and unpaid interest. |
|
(c) |
|
These amounts include funding commitments to private equity funds which
have been included in the respective years based on estimated timing of
capital calls provided to us by the funds management. Also included are
$6.5 million conditional commitments to provide non-consolidated partner
companies with additional funding. |
|
(d) |
|
We have received distributions as both a general partner and a limited
partner from certain private equity funds. Under certain circumstances, we
may be required to return a portion or all the distributions we received as
a general partner of a fund for a further distribution to such funds
limited partners (the clawback). The maximum clawback we could be
required to return is approximately $3.6 million, of which $1.1 million was
reflected in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and $2.5
million was reflected in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. |
|
(e) |
|
Reflects the amount payable to our former Chairman and CEO under a contract. |
|
(f) |
|
Letters of credit include a $6.3 million letter of credit provided to the
landlord of CompuComs Dallas headquarters lease in connection with the
sale of CompuCom in 2004 and a $3.0 million letter of credit issued by
Clarient supporting its office lease. |
42
We have employment agreements with certain executive officers that provide for severance
payments to the executive officer in the event the officer is terminated without cause or in the
event the officer terminates his employment for good reason. The maximum aggregate exposure
under the agreements was approximately $8.0 million at September 30, 2008.
We are involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a
material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Factors That May Affect Future Results
You should carefully consider the information set forth below. The following risk factors
describe situations in which our business, financial condition or results of operations could be
materially harmed, and the value of our securities may decline. You should also refer to other
information included or incorporated by reference in this report.
Risks Related to our Business
Our business depends upon our ability to make good decisions regarding the deployment of capital
into new or existing partner companies and, ultimately, the performance of our partner companies,
which is uncertain.
If we make poor decisions regarding the deployment of capital into new or existing partner
companies our business model will not succeed. Our success as a company ultimately depends on our
ability to choose the right partner companies. If our partner companies do not succeed, the value
of our assets could be significantly reduced and require substantial impairments or write-offs, and
our results of operations and the price of our common stock could decline. The risks relating to
our partner companies include:
|
§ |
|
most of our partner companies have a history of operating losses or a limited
operating history; |
|
|
§ |
|
intensifying competition affecting the products and services our partner companies
offer could adversely affect their businesses, financial condition, results of
operations and prospects for growth; |
|
|
§ |
|
inability to adapt to the rapidly changing marketplaces; |
|
|
§ |
|
inability to manage growth; |
|
|
§ |
|
the need for additional capital to fund their operations, which we may not be able to
fund or which may not be available from third parties on acceptable terms, if at all; |
|
|
§ |
|
inability to protect their proprietary rights and/or infringing on the
proprietary rights of others; |
|
|
§ |
|
certain of our partner companies could face legal liabilities from claims made
against them based upon their operations, products or work; |
|
|
§ |
|
the impact of economic downturns on their operations, results and growth
prospects; |
|
|
§ |
|
inability to attract and retain qualified personnel; and |
|
|
§ |
|
government regulations and legal uncertainties may place financial burdens on the
businesses of our partner companies. |
These risks are discussed in greater detail under the caption Risks Related to Our Partner
Companies below.
43
Our partner companies (and the nature of our interests in them) could vary widely from period to
period.
As part of our strategy, we continually assess the value to our shareholders of our interests
in our partner companies. We also regularly evaluate alternative uses for our capital resources.
As a result, depending on market conditions, growth prospects and other key factors, we may at any
time:
|
§ |
|
change the partner companies on which we focus; |
|
|
§ |
|
sell some or all of our interests in any of our partner companies; or |
|
|
§ |
|
otherwise change the nature of our interests in our partner companies. |
Therefore, the nature of our holdings could vary significantly from period to period.
Our consolidated financial results also may vary significantly based upon which partner
companies are included in our financial statements. For example:
|
§ |
|
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we consolidated the results
of operations of Clarient in continuing operations. In our Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007, we consolidated the results of operations of Acsis, Alliance
Consulting, Clarient, and Laureate Pharma in continuing operations. The Bundle
Transaction closed on May 6, 2008 and included the sale of three of our majority-owned
partner companies Acsis, Alliance Consulting and Laureate Pharma. |
Our business model does not rely, or plan, upon the receipt of operating cash flows from our
partner companies. Our partner companies currently provide us with no cash flow from their
operations. We rely on cash on hand, liquidity events and our ability to generate cash from
capital raising activities to finance our operations.
We need capital to develop new partner company relationships and to fund the capital needs of
our existing partner companies. We also need cash to service and repay our outstanding debt,
finance our corporate overhead and meet our existing funding commitments. As a result, we have
substantial cash requirements. Our partner companies currently provide us with no cash flow from
their operations. To the extent our partner companies generate any cash from operations, they
generally retain the funds to develop their own businesses. As a result, we must rely on cash on
hand, liquidity events and new capital raising activities to meet our cash needs. If we are unable
to find ways of monetizing our holdings or to raise additional capital on attractive terms, we may
face liquidity issues that will require us to curtail our new business efforts, constrain our
ability to execute our business strategy and limit our ability to provide financial support to our
existing partner companies.
Fluctuations in the price of the common stock of our publicly traded holdings may affect the price
of our common stock.
Fluctuations in the market prices of the common stock of our publicly traded holdings are
likely to affect the price of our common stock. The market prices of our publicly traded holdings
have been highly volatile and subject to fluctuations unrelated or disproportionate to operating
performance. For example, the aggregate market value of our holdings in Clarient (Nasdaq: CLRT),
our only publicly listed partner company, at September 30, 2008 was approximately $74.5 million,
and at December 31, 2007 was approximately $86.8 million.
Intense competition from other acquirers of interests in companies could result in lower gains or
possibly losses on our partner companies.
We face intense competition from other capital providers as we acquire and develop interests
in our partner companies. Some of our competitors have more experience identifying and acquiring
companies and have greater financial and management resources, brand name recognition or industry
contacts than we have. Despite making most of our acquisitions at a stage when our partner
companies are not publicly traded, we may still pay higher prices for those equity interests
because of higher valuations of similar public companies and competition from other acquirers and
capital providers, which could result in lower gains or possibly losses.
44
We may be unable to obtain maximum value for our holdings or sell our holdings on a timely basis.
We hold significant positions in our partner companies. Consequently, if we were to divest
all or part of our holdings in a partner company, we may have to sell our interests at a relative
discount to a price which may be received by a seller of a smaller portion. For partner companies
with publicly traded stock, we may be unable to sell our holdings at then-quoted market prices.
The trading volume and public float in the common stock of our publicly traded partner companies
are small relative to our holdings. As a result, any significant open-market divestiture by us of
our holdings in these partner companies, if possible at all, would likely have a material adverse
effect on the market price of their common stock and on our proceeds from such a divestiture.
Additionally, we may not be able to take our partner companies public as a means of monetizing our
position or creating shareholder value.
Registration and other requirements under applicable securities laws may adversely affect our
ability to dispose of our holdings on a timely basis.
Our success is dependent on our executive management.
Our success is dependent on our executive management teams ability to execute our strategy.
A loss of one or more of the members of our executive management team without adequate replacement
could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our business strategy may not be successful if valuations in the market sectors in which our
partner companies participate decline.
Our strategy involves creating value for our shareholders by helping our partner companies
build value and, if appropriate, accessing the public and private capital markets. Therefore, our
success is dependent on the value of our partner companies as determined by the public and private
capital markets. Many factors, including reduced market interest, may cause the market value of
our publicly traded partner companies to decline. If valuations in the market sectors in which our
partner companies participate decline, their access to the public and private capital markets on
terms acceptable to them may be limited.
Our partner companies could make business decisions that are not in our best interests or with
which we do not agree, which could impair the value of our holdings.
Although we may seek a controlling equity interest and participation in the management of our
partner companies, we may not be able to control the significant business decisions of our partner
companies. We may have shared control or no control over some of our partner companies. In
addition, although we currently own a controlling interest in some of our partner companies, we may
not maintain this controlling interest. Acquisitions of interests in partner companies in which we
share or have no control, and the dilution of our interests in or loss of control of partner
companies, will involve additional risks that could cause the performance of our interests and our
operating results to suffer, including:
|
§ |
|
the management of a partner company having economic or business interests or
objectives that are different than ours; and |
|
|
§ |
|
partner companies not taking our advice with respect to the financial or operating
difficulties they may encounter. |
Our inability to control our partner companies also could prevent us from assisting them,
financially or otherwise, or could prevent us from liquidating our interests in them at a time or
at a price that is favorable to us. Additionally, our partner companies may not act in ways that
are consistent with our business strategy. These factors could hamper our ability to maximize
returns on our interests and cause us to recognize losses on our interests in these partner
companies.
We may have to buy, sell or retain assets when we would otherwise not wish to do so in order to
avoid registration under the Investment Company Act.
The Investment Company Act of 1940 regulates companies which are engaged primarily in the
business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities. Under the Investment
Company Act, a company may be deemed to be an investment company if it owns investment securities
with a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (excluding government securities and
cash items) on an unconsolidated basis, unless an exemption or safe harbor applies. We refer to
this test as the 40% Test. Securities issued by companies other than majority-owned partner
companies are generally considered investment securities for purpose of the Investment Company
Act, unless other circumstances exist which actively involve
45
the company holding such interests in the management of the underlying company. We are a
company that partners with growth-stage technology and life sciences companies to build value; we
are not engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. We
are in compliance with the 40% Test. Consequently, we do not believe that we are an investment
company under the Investment Company Act.
We monitor our compliance with the 40% Test and seek to conduct our business activities to
comply with this test. It is not feasible for us to be regulated as an investment company because
the Investment Company Act rules are inconsistent with our strategy of actively helping our partner
companies in their efforts to build value. In order to continue to comply with the 40% Test, we
may need to take various actions which we would otherwise not pursue. For example, we may need to
retain a majority interest in a partner company that we no longer consider strategic, we may not be
able to acquire an interest in a company unless we are able to obtain majority ownership interest
in the company, or we may be limited in the manner or timing in which we sell our interests in a
partner company. Our ownership levels also may be affected if our partner companies are acquired
by third parties or if our partner companies issue stock which dilutes our majority ownership. The
actions we may need to take to address these issues while maintaining compliance with the 40% Test
could adversely affect our ability to create and realize value at our partner companies.
Recent economic disruptions and downturns may have negative repercussions for the Company.
Recent events in the United States and international capital markets, debt markets and
economies generally may negatively impact the Companys ability to pursue certain of its tactical
and strategic initiatives, such as: accessing additional public or private equity or debt financing
for itself or for its partner companies; and selling the Companys interests in its partner
companies on terms acceptable to the Company and in time frames consistent with our expectations.
We have material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and cannot provide
assurance that additional material weaknesses will not be identified in the future. Our failure to
effectively maintain our internal control over financial reporting could result in material
misstatements in our financial statements which could require us to restate financial statements,
cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, cause investors to lose confidence in our
reported financial information or have a negative affect on our stock price.
We determined that we had deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007 that constituted material weaknesses as defined by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Boards Audit Standard No. 5. These material weaknesses are identified in Item
9A, Controls and Procedures within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
We cannot assure that additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial
reporting will not be identified in the future. Any failure to maintain or implement required new
or improved controls, or any difficulties we encounter in their implementation, could result in
additional material weaknesses, or could result in material misstatements in our financial
statements. These misstatements could result in a restatement of financial statements, cause us to
fail to meet our reporting obligations or cause investors to lose confidence in our reported
financial information, leading to a decline in our stock price.
Risks Related to our Partner Companies
Most of our partner companies have a history of operating losses or limited operating history and
may never be profitable.
Most of our partner companies have a history of operating losses or limited operating history,
have significant historical losses and may never be profitable. Many have incurred substantial
costs to develop and market their products, have incurred net losses and cannot fund their cash
needs from operations. We expect that the operating expenses of certain of our partner companies
will increase substantially in the foreseeable future as they continue to develop products and
services, increase sales and marketing efforts, and expand operations.
Our partner companies face intense competition, which could adversely affect their business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects for growth.
There is intense competition in the technology and life sciences marketplaces, and we expect
competition to intensify in the future. Our business, financial condition, results of operations
and prospects for growth will be materially adversely affected if our partner companies are not
able to compete successfully. Many of the present and potential competitors may
46
have greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than those of our partner
companies. This may place our partner companies at a disadvantage in responding to the offerings
of their competitors, technological changes or changes in client requirements. Also, our partner
companies may be at a competitive disadvantage because many of their competitors have greater name
recognition, more extensive client bases and a broader range of product offerings. In addition,
our partner companies may compete against one another.
Our partner companies may fail if they do not adapt to the rapidly changing technology and life
sciences marketplaces.
If our partner companies fail to adapt to rapid changes in technology and customer and
supplier demands, they may not become or remain profitable. There is no assurance that the
products and services of our partner companies will achieve or maintain market penetration or
commercial success, or that the businesses of our partner companies will be successful.
The technology and life sciences marketplaces are characterized by:
|
§ |
|
rapidly changing technology; |
|
|
§ |
|
evolving industry standards; |
|
|
§ |
|
frequent new products and services; |
|
|
§ |
|
shifting distribution channels; |
|
|
§ |
|
evolving government regulation; |
|
|
§ |
|
frequently changing intellectual property landscapes; and |
|
|
§ |
|
changing customer demands. |
Our future success will depend on our partner companies ability to adapt to these rapidly
evolving marketplaces. They may not be able to adequately or economically adapt their products and
services, develop new products and services or establish and maintain effective distribution
channels for their products and services. If our partner companies are unable to offer competitive
products and services or maintain effective distribution channels, they will sell fewer products
and services and forego potential revenue, possibly causing them to lose money. In addition, we
and our partner companies may not be able to respond to the rapid technology changes in an
economically efficient manner, and our partner companies may become or remain unprofitable.
Many of our partner companies may grow rapidly and may be unable to manage their growth.
We expect some of our partner companies to grow rapidly. Rapid growth often places
considerable operational, managerial and financial strain on a business. To successfully manage
rapid growth, our partner companies must, among other things:
|
§ |
|
rapidly improve, upgrade and expand their business infrastructures; |
|
|
§ |
|
scale up production operations; |
|
|
§ |
|
develop appropriate financial reporting controls; |
|
|
§ |
|
attract and maintain qualified personnel; and |
|
|
§ |
|
maintain appropriate levels of liquidity. |
If our partner companies are unable to manage their growth successfully, their ability to
respond effectively to competition and to achieve or maintain profitability will be adversely
affected.
Based on our business model, some or all of our partner companies will need to raise additional
capital to fund their operations at any given time. We may not be able to fund some or all of such
amounts, and such amounts may not be available from third parties on acceptable terms, if at all.
We cannot be certain that our partner companies will be able to obtain additional financing on
favorable terms, if at all. Because our resources and our ability to raise capital are limited, we
may not be able to provide our partner companies with sufficient capital resources to enable them
to reach a cash flow positive position. We also may fail to accurately project the capital needs
of our partner companies for purposes of our cash flow planning. If our partner companies need to
but are not
47
able to raise capital from us or other outside sources, then they may need to cease or scale
back operations. In such event, our interest in any such partner company will become less
valuable.
Recent economic disruptions and downturns may negatively affect our partner companies plans and
their results of operations.
Many of our partner companies are largely dependant upon outside sources of capital to fund
their operations. Disruptions in the availability of capital from such sources will negatively
affect the ability of such partner companies to pursue their business models and will force such
companies to revise their growth and development plans accordingly. Any such changes will, in
turn, affect the ability of the Company to realize the value of its capital deployments in such
companies.
Our partner companies are subject to independent audits and the results of such independent audits
could adversely impact our partner companies.
As reported in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, Clarients independent
auditors determined that there was substantial doubt about Clarients ability to continue as a
going concern. The going concern explanatory paragraph in Clarients audit opinion could have a
negative impact on:
|
§ |
|
Clarients ability to extend, renew or refinance its bank credit facility or to
secure additional debt or equity financing in order to fund anticipated working capital
needs and capital expenditures and to execute its strategy; |
|
|
§ |
|
Clarients relationships with existing customers or potential new customers; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Clarients stock price. |
If any of such events were to occur, the value of our holdings in Clarient could be adversely
impacted.
Some of our partner companies may be unable to protect their proprietary rights and may infringe on
the proprietary rights of others.
Our partner companies assert various forms of intellectual property protection. Intellectual
property may constitute an important part of our partner companies assets and competitive
strengths. Federal law, most typically, copyright, patent, trademark and trade secret laws,
generally protects intellectual property rights. Although we expect that our partner companies
will take reasonable efforts to protect the rights to their intellectual property, the complexity
of international trade secret, copyright, trademark and patent law, coupled with the limited
resources of these partner companies and the demands of quick delivery of products and services to
market, create a risk that their efforts will prove inadequate to prevent misappropriation of our
partner companies technology, or third parties may develop similar technology independently.
Some of our partner companies also license intellectual property from third parties, and it is
possible that they could become subject to infringement actions based upon their use of the
intellectual property licensed from those third parties. Our partner companies generally obtain
representations as to the origin and ownership of such licensed intellectual property; however,
this may not adequately protect them. Any claims against our partner companies proprietary
rights, with or without merit, could subject our partner companies to costly litigation and the
diversion of their technical and management personnel from other business concerns. If our partner
companies incur costly litigation and their personnel are not effectively deployed, the expenses
and losses incurred by our partner companies will increase and their profits, if any, will
decrease.
Third parties have and may assert infringement or other intellectual property claims against
our partner companies based on their patents or other intellectual property claims. Even though we
believe our partner companies products do not infringe any third-partys patents, they may have to
pay substantial damages, possibly including treble damages, if it is ultimately determined that
they do. They may have to obtain a license to sell their products if it is determined that their
products infringe another persons intellectual property. Our partner companies might be
prohibited from selling their products before they obtain a license, which, if available at all,
may require them to pay substantial royalties. Even if infringement claims against our partner
companies are without merit, defending these types of lawsuits takes significant time, may be
expensive and may divert management attention from other business concerns.
Certain of our partner companies could face legal liabilities from claims made against their
operations, products or work.
The manufacture and sale of certain of our partner companies products entails an inherent
risk of product liability. Certain of our partner companies maintain product liability insurance.
Although none of our partner companies to date have experienced any material losses, there can be
no assurance that they will be able to maintain or acquire adequate product liability insurance in
the future and any product liability claim could have a material adverse effect on our partner
companies
48
revenue and income. In addition, many of the engagements of our partner companies involve
projects that are critical to the operation of their clients businesses. If our partner companies
fail to meet their contractual obligations, they could be subject to legal liability, which could
adversely affect their business, operating results and financial condition. The provisions our
partner companies typically include in their contracts, which are designed to limit their exposure
to legal claims relating to their services and the applications they develop, may not protect our
partner companies or may not be enforceable. Also, as consultants, some of our partner companies
depend on their relationships with their clients and their reputation for high-quality services and
integrity to retain and attract clients. As a result, claims made against our partner companies
work may damage their reputation, which in turn could impact their ability to compete for new work
and negatively impact their revenue and profitability.
Our partner companies success depends on their ability to attract and retain qualified personnel.
Our partner companies are dependent upon their ability to attract and retain senior management
and key personnel, including trained technical and marketing personnel. Our partner companies also
will need to continue to hire additional personnel as they expand. Some of our partner companies
may have employees represented by labor unions. Although our existing partner companies have not
been the subject of a work stoppage, any future work stoppage could have a material adverse effect
on their respective operations. A shortage in the availability of the requisite qualified
personnel or work stoppage would limit the ability of our partner companies to grow, to increase
sales of their existing products and services, and to launch new products and services.
Government regulations and legal uncertainties may place financial burdens on the businesses of our
partner companies.
Failure to comply with applicable requirements of the FDA or comparable regulation in foreign
countries can result in fines, recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of
production, withdrawal of existing product approvals or clearances, refusal to approve or clear new
applications or notices and criminal prosecution. Manufacturers of pharmaceuticals and medical
diagnostic devices and operators of laboratory facilities are subject to strict federal and state
regulation regarding validation and the quality of manufacturing and laboratory facilities.
Failure to comply with these quality regulation systems requirements could result in civil or
criminal penalties or enforcement proceedings, including the recall of a product or a cease
distribution order. The enactment of any additional laws or regulations that affect healthcare
insurance policy and reimbursement (including Medicare reimbursement) could negatively affect our
partner companies. If Medicare or private payors change the rates at which our partner companies
or their customers are reimbursed by insurance providers for their products, such changes could
adversely impact our partner companies.
Some of our partner companies are subject to significant environmental, health and safety
regulation.
Some of our partner companies are subject to licensing and regulation under federal, state and
local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and human health and
safety, including laws and regulations relating to the handling, transportation and disposal of
medical specimens, infectious and hazardous waste and radioactive materials, as well as to the
safety and health of manufacturing and laboratory employees. In addition, the federal Occupational
Safety and Health Administration has established extensive requirements relating to workplace
safety.
49
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to equity price risks on the marketable portion of our securities. These
securities include equity positions in partner companies, many of which have experienced
significant volatility in their stock prices. Historically, we have not attempted to reduce or
eliminate our market exposure on securities. Based on closing market prices at September 30, 2008,
the fair market value of Clarient, our only publicly traded partner company, was approximately
$74.5 million. A 20% decrease in Clarients stock price would result in an approximate $14.9
million decrease in the fair value of our holding in Clarient.
In February 2004, we completed the issuance of $150.0 million in face value of our 2024
Debentures with a stated maturity of March 15, 2024. During the third quarter 2008, we repurchased
$38.0 million in face value of the 2024 debentures for $30.0 million in cash. In 2006, we
repurchased a total of $21.0 million in face value of the 2024 Debentures. Interest payments of
approximately $1.2 million each are due on the now outstanding 2024 Debentures in March and
September of each year. The holders of these 2024 Debentures have the right to require repurchase
of the 2024 Debentures on March 21, 2011, March 20, 2014 or March 20, 2019 at a repurchase price
equal to 100% of their face amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. In October 2004, we used
approximately $16.7 million of the proceeds from the CompuCom sale to escrow interest payments due
through March 15, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market Value |
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
at |
Liabilities |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
2024 Debentures due by year (in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
91.0 |
|
|
$ |
63.0 |
|
Fixed interest rate |
|
|
2.625 |
% |
|
|
2.625 |
% |
|
|
2.625 |
% |
|
|
2.625 |
% |
|
|
2.625 |
% |
Interest expense (in millions) |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
31.5 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
50
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that, because of material weaknesses in internal control over financial
reporting discussed in Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting included in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 that were not remediated as of
September 30, 2008, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to provide reasonable
assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management,
including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance that the
objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute
assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been
detected.
We have begun efforts to design and implement improvements in our internal controls over
financial reporting to address the material weaknesses discussed in
Item 9A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. On June 1,
2008, Clarient went effective with its
in-house billing and collection system. During the three months ended September 30, 2008,
Clarients third-party billing provider continued to process collections of outstanding accounts
receivable dated prior to June 1, 2008. Effective October 31, 2008, Clarients agreement with its
third-party billing provider was terminated and Clarient will, going
forward, process its own collections for outstanding
pre-June 1, 2008 accounts receivable. As of September 30, 2008, we continue to evaluate the
operating effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, which include our
remediation plan and testing of the aforementioned material weaknesses and evaluation of the new
internal controls implemented over Clarients in-house billing and collection system.
In light of these unremediated material weaknesses and the new internal controls over
Clarients in-house billing and collection system, we performed additional post-closing procedures
and analyses in order to prepare the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report. As
a result of these procedures, we believe that our Consolidated Financial Statements included in
this report present fairly, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
No other change in our internal
control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting. Our business strategy involves the acquisition of interests in new businesses on an
on-going basis, most of which are young, growing companies. Typically, these companies have not
historically had all of the controls and procedures they would need to comply with the requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules promulgated thereunder. These companies also
frequently develop new products and services. Following an acquisition, or the launch of a new
product or service, we work with the companys management to implement all necessary controls and
procedures.
51
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes in our risk factors from the
information set forth above under the heading Factors That May Affect Future Results and in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Fluctuations in the price of the common stock of our publicly-traded holdings may affect the price
of our common stock.
Fluctuations in the market prices of the common stock of our publicly-traded holdings are
likely to affect the price of our common stock. The market prices of our publicly-traded holdings
have been highly volatile and subject to fluctuations unrelated or disproportionate to operating
performance. For example, the aggregate market value of our holdings in Clarient (Nasdaq: CLRT) at
September 30, 2008 was approximately $74.5 million, and at December 31, 2007 was approximately
$86.8 million.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not
the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or
that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and/or operating results.
Our partner companies (and the nature of our interests in them) could vary widely from period to
period.
As part of our strategy, we continually assess the value to our shareholders of our interests
in our partner companies. We also regularly evaluate alternative uses for our capital resources.
As a result, depending on market conditions, growth prospects and other key factors, we may at any
time:
|
§ |
|
change the partner companies on which we focus; |
|
|
§ |
|
sell some or all of our interests in any of our partner companies; or |
|
|
§ |
|
otherwise change the nature of our interests in our partner companies. |
Therefore, the nature of our holdings could vary significantly from period to period.
Our consolidated financial results also may vary significantly based upon which partner
companies are included in our financial statements. For example:
|
§ |
|
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we consolidated the results
of operations of Clarient in continuing operations. In our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 we consolidated the results of operations of Acsis,
Alliance Consulting, Clarient, and Laureate Pharma in continuing operations. The Bundle
Transaction closed on May 6, 2008 and included the sale of three of our majority-owned
partner companies Acsis, Alliance Consulting and Laureate Pharma. |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table summarizes repurchases of our common stock in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008:
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Value of Shares That |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Average |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
May Yet Be |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Price Paid |
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under the |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Per Share |
|
Announced Plan |
|
Plan (in thousands) |
June 1 30, 2008 |
|
|
161,600 |
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
|
161,600 |
|
|
$ |
9,780 |
|
July 1 31, 2008 |
|
|
399,500 |
|
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
|
|
399,500 |
|
|
$ |
9,293 |
|
August 1 31, 2008 |
|
|
241,700 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
|
241,700 |
|
|
$ |
8,959 |
|
September 1 30, 2008 |
|
|
172,100 |
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
|
172,100 |
|
|
$ |
8,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
974,900 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
|
974,900 |
|
|
$ |
8,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On May 7, 2008, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized us, from time to time
and depending on market conditions, to repurchase shares of our outstanding common stock, with up
to an aggregate value of $10.0 million, exclusive of fees and commissions. This authorization has
no expiration date. Our Board of Directors authorization regarding common stock repurchases does
not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of common stock and may be modified or suspended
at any time at our discretion.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The shareholders of the Company voted on three items of business at the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders held on July 23, 2008:
|
1. |
|
The election of eleven directors; |
|
|
2. |
|
A proposal to amend the Companys Second Amended and Restated Articles
of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Companys
outstanding common stock at an exchange ratio of not less than 1-for-4
and not more than 1-for-8, and authorize the Companys Board of
Directors, in its discretion, to implement the reverse stock split
within this range at any time prior to the Companys 2009 annual
meeting of shareholders; and |
|
|
3. |
|
A proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2008. |
The nominees for director were elected based upon the following votes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOMINEE |
|
VOTES FOR |
|
VOTES WITHHELD |
Peter J. Boni |
|
|
99,043,819 |
|
|
|
7,400,221 |
|
Michael J. Cody |
|
|
102,791,526 |
|
|
|
3,652,514 |
|
Julie A. Dobson |
|
|
99,128,761 |
|
|
|
7,315,279 |
|
Robert E. Keith, Jr. |
|
|
99,073,464 |
|
|
|
7,370,576 |
|
Andrew E. Lietz |
|
|
102,764,749 |
|
|
|
3,679,291 |
|
George MacKenzie |
|
|
102,441,858 |
|
|
|
4,002,182 |
|
George D. McClelland |
|
|
102,462,821 |
|
|
|
3,981,219 |
|
Jack L. Messman |
|
|
102,726,375 |
|
|
|
3,717,665 |
|
John W. Poduska, Sr. |
|
|
102,690,450 |
|
|
|
3,753,590 |
|
John J. Roberts |
|
|
102,441,901 |
|
|
|
4,002,139 |
|
Robert J. Rosenthal |
|
|
102,454,552 |
|
|
|
3,989,488 |
|
The proposal to amend the Companys Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to effect
a reverse stock split of the Companys outstanding common stock at an exchange ratio of not less
than 1-for-4 and not more than 1-for-8, and authorize the Companys Board of Directors, in its
discretion, to implement the reverse stock split within this range at any time
prior to the Companys 2009 annual meeting of shareholders, received the following votes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,173,369 |
|
|
VOTES FOR |
|
8,895,537 |
|
|
VOTES AGAINST |
|
375,134 |
|
|
ABSTENTIONS |
|
15,091,520 |
|
|
NOT VOTED |
53
The proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 received the following votes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,837,250 |
|
|
VOTES FOR |
|
1,028,201 |
|
|
VOTES AGAINST |
|
578,589 |
|
|
ABSTENTIONS |
|
15,091,520 |
|
|
NOT VOTED |
54
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits.
The following is a list of exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K filed as part of
this Report. For exhibits that previously have been filed, the Registrant incorporates those
exhibits herein by reference. The exhibit table below includes the Form Type and Filing Date of
the previous filing and the location of the exhibit in the previous filing which is being
incorporated by reference herein. Documents which are incorporated by reference to filings by
parties other than the Registrant are identified in a footnote to this table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated Filing Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original |
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Form Type & |
|
Exhibit |
Number |
|
Description |
|
Filing Date |
|
Number |
10.1 *
|
|
Compensation Summary Non-Employee Directors
|
|
Form 10-Q
8/11/08
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
First Amendment and Waiver of Amended and
Restated Senior Subordinated Revolving
Credit Agreement, dated July 31, 2008, by
and between Clarient, Inc. and Safeguard
Delaware, Inc.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Third Amendment and Waiver to Amended and
Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of July
31, 2008, by and between Comerica Bank and
Clarient, Inc.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 *
|
|
1999 Equity Compensation Plan, as amended
and restated on October 21, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
2001 Associates Equity Compensation Plan, as
amended and restated on October 21, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 *
|
|
2004 Equity Compensation Plan, as amended
and restated on October 21, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Peter J. Boni pursuant to
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Stephen T. Zarrilli
pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Peter J. Boni pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Stephen T. Zarrilli
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 4, 2008 by
Clarient, Inc. (SEC File No. 000-22677). |
|
* |
|
Management contracts or compensatory plans, contracts or arrangements in which directors
and/or executive officers of the Registrant may participate. |
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
November 6, 2008
|
|
PETER J. BONI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter J. Boni |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
November 6, 2008
|
|
STEPHEN T. ZARRILLI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen T. Zarrilli |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
56