S-4/A
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 3, 2006
Registration
No. 333-131867
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Amendment No. 1
to
Form S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada |
|
6022 |
|
88-0365922 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
Western Alliance Bancorporation
2700 West Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Telephone: (702) 248-4200
(Name, address and telephone of principal executive
offices)
Robert Sarver
President, Chief Executive Officer
2700 West Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Telephone: (702) 248-4200
(Name, address, including zip code and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
with copies to:
|
|
|
Stuart G. Stein, Esq.
R. Daniel Keating, Esq.
Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.
555 13th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone: (202) 637-8575
Facsimile: (202) 637-5910 |
|
Kenneth J. Baronsky, Esq.
Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy LLP
601 S. Figueroa Street, 30th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 892-4333
Facsimile: (213) 892-4733 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of the
securities to the public: As soon as practicable after this
Registration Statement becomes effective and all other
conditions to the consummation of the transaction described
herein have been satisfied or waived.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
|
|
|
Western Alliance Bancorporation
2700 West Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Telephone: (702) 248-4200 |
|
Intermountain First Bancorp
777 N. Rainbow Boulevard
Las Vegas, Nevada 89107
Telephone: (702) 310-4000 |
|
PROSPECTUS
|
|
PROXY STATEMENT |
The Boards of Directors of Western Alliance Bancorporation
(Western Alliance) and Intermountain First Bancorp
(Intermountain) have approved an agreement and plan
of merger, pursuant to which Intermountain will merge with and
into Western Alliance, with Western Alliance surviving (referred
to herein as the merger).
If the merger takes place, you may elect to receive either
2.44 shares of Western Alliance common stock or $71.30 in
cash, or some combination thereof, for each share of
Intermountain common stock you own, unless you exercise your
dissenters rights. Each outstanding Intermountain stock
option will be converted into an option to
purchase 2.44 shares of Western Alliance common stock.
You will have the opportunity to elect the form of consideration
to be received for your shares, subject to proration and
allocation procedures set forth in the merger agreement which
are intended to ensure that at least 60% of the outstanding
shares of Intermountain common stock on a fully diluted basis
will be converted into shares of Western Alliance common stock.
Therefore, your ability to receive all cash may depend on the
elections of other Intermountain shareholders.
We expect that the merger will generally be tax-free with
respect to any Western Alliance common stock that you receive
and will generally be taxable with respect to any cash that you
receive. Western Alliances common stock is traded on the
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol WAL.
This is a prospectus of Western Alliance relating to its
offering of up to 3,764,120 shares of Western Alliance
common stock to Intermountain shareholders in the proposed
merger and a proxy statement of Intermountain. This document
contains important information about Western Alliance,
Intermountain, the merger and the conditions that must be
satisfied before the merger can occur. Please give all the
information your careful attention.
Important Message for Holders of Intermountain Voting Common
Stock
Your vote is very important. The merger agreement and the merger
must be approved by the holders of at least a majority of the
outstanding shares of Intermountains common stock entitled
to vote. To vote your shares, you may use the enclosed proxy
card or attend the special shareholders meeting we will hold to
allow you to consider and vote on the merger. To approve
the merger agreement, you must vote for the proposal by
following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card. If you do
not vote at all, that will, in effect, count as a vote against
the proposal. We urge you to vote FOR this proposal.
William Bullard
Vice President
Intermountain First Bancorp
Western Alliances common stock has not been approved
or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, any
state securities commission, or the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, nor have any of these institutions passed upon the
accuracy or adequacy of this proxy statement/ prospectus. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. The shares
of Western Alliance common stock are not savings deposit
accounts or other obligations of any bank or savings
association, and are not insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency.
Please see Risk Factors beginning on page 7
for a discussion of risks associated with the merger and in
owning Western Alliance stock.
The date of this proxy statement/ prospectus is March 3,
2006
and is first being mailed to shareholders on March 7, 2006
THIS PROSPECTUS INCORPORATES IMPORTANT BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL
INFORMATION ABOUT WESTERN ALLIANCE THAT IS NOT INCLUDED IN OR
DELIVERED WITH THIS DOCUMENT. THIS INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE
WITHOUT CHARGE TO YOU IF YOU CALL OR WRITE TO DALE GIBBONS,
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION, 2700 WEST SAHARA AVENUE, LAS
VEGAS, NV 89102, TELEPHONE: (702) 248-4200, OR WILLIAM
BULLARD, INTERMOUNTAIN FIRST BANCORP, 777 N. RAINBOW
BOULEVARD, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89107, TELEPHONE:
(702) 310-4000, IN ORDER TO OBTAIN TIMELY DELIVERY OF
DOCUMENTS YOU SHOULD REQUEST INFORMATION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE,
BUT NO LATER THAN MARCH 23, 2006
INTERMOUNTAIN FIRST BANCORP
777 N. Rainbow Boulevard
Las Vegas, Nevada 89107
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON
March 28, 2006
A special meeting of shareholders of Intermountain First Bancorp
(Intermountain) will be held at 10:00 a.m.
local time on March 28, 2006, at its principal executive
offices at 777 N. Rainbow Boulevard, Las Vegas, Nevada
89107, for the following purposes:
|
|
|
1. To adopt and approve an agreement and plan of merger,
pursuant to which Intermountain will merge with and into Western
Alliance Bancorporation (Western Alliance) with
Western Alliance surviving (referred to herein as the
merger). |
|
|
2. To transact any other business that properly comes
before the special meeting, or any adjournments or postponements
of the meeting, including, without limitation, a motion to
adjourn the special meeting to another time and/or place for the
purpose of soliciting additional proxies in order to approve the
merger agreement and the merger or otherwise. |
You are entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting
or any adjournments or postponements thereof only if you were a
holder of record of Intermountains voting common stock at
the close of business on March 3, 2006.
Intermountains Board of Directors has determined that the
merger is advisable and is fair to and in the best interest of
Intermountains shareholders, has approved the merger
agreement and the merger, and recommends that the holders of
Intermountains voting common stock vote to approve the
merger agreement and the merger.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of
Intermountains voting common stock outstanding on
March 3, 2006 is required to approve the merger agreement
and the merger. The required vote of Intermountains
shareholders is based on the total number of shares of
Intermountains voting common stock outstanding and not on
the number of shares which are actually voted. Not returning a
proxy card, or not voting in person at the special meeting or
abstaining from voting will have the same effect as voting
AGAINST the merger agreement and the merger.
If you hold Intermountain common stock on the record date, you
are entitled to dissent from the merger under
Sections 92.A-300 through 92.A-500 of the Nevada Revised
Statutes (NRS). A copy of these sections is attached
to the proxy statement/ prospectus at Appendix B.
It is very important all shares of Intermountain voting common
stock be represented at the special meeting. Whether or not you
plan to attend the special meeting, please complete, date and
sign the enclosed proxy card and return it as soon as possible
in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. A shareholder who
executes a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is
exercised by giving written notice to the Secretary of
Intermountain at the address set forth above, by subsequently
filing another proxy or by attending the special meeting and
voting in person.
|
|
|
By order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
William Bullard |
|
Vice President |
Las Vegas, Nevada
March 3, 2006
If you hold Intermountain voting common stock, your vote is
important. Please complete, sign, date and return your proxy
card.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
iv |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
Appendix A Agreement and Plan of Merger
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
Appendix B Sections 92.A-300 through 92.A-500 of
the Nevada Revised Statutes Dissenters
Rights
|
|
|
B-1 |
|
EX-5.1 |
EX-8.1 |
EX-10.11 |
EX-23.1 |
EX-99.1 |
iii
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why are Western Alliance and Intermountain proposing the
transaction? |
|
A: |
|
Western Alliance and Intermountain have a shared commitment to
play integral roles in the growth and expansion of Nevadas
banking industry. The proposed merger provides an opportunity
for Western Alliance to substantially expand its presence in the
Las Vegas and Henderson markets, and extend its operations into
Reno. Intermountain believes that the proposed merger will
enable Intermountain to align with a partner who will enhance
the banking services available to its customers without
sacrificing the personal attention and dedication that
Intermountain has always offered. |
|
Q: |
|
What will I receive in the merger? |
|
A: |
|
If the merger agreement is approved and the merger is
subsequently completed, you may elect to receive either
2.44 shares of Western Alliance common stock or $71.30 in
cash, or some combination thereof, for each share of
Intermountain common stock you own, unless you exercise your
dissenters rights. You will have the opportunity to elect
the form of consideration to be received for your shares,
subject to allocation procedures set forth in the merger
agreement which are intended to ensure that at least 60% of the
outstanding shares of Intermountain common stock will be
converted into shares of Western Alliance common stock.
Therefore, your ability to receive all cash will depend on the
elections of other Intermountain shareholders. Western Alliance
will pay cash instead of issuing fractional shares. |
|
Q: |
|
How do I make an election? |
|
A: |
|
Each Intermountain shareholder will receive an election form,
which you should complete and return, along with your
Intermountain stock certificate(s), according to the
instructions printed on the form. The election deadline will be
5:00 p.m., New York City time, on March 27, 2006, the
date prior to the date of the special meeting (the
election deadline). A copy of the election form is
being mailed under separate cover on or about the date of this
proxy statement/ prospectus. If you do not send in the election
form with your stock certificates by the deadline, you will be
deemed not to have made an election and you may be paid in cash,
Western Alliance common stock or a combination of cash and stock
depending on, and after giving effect to, the number of valid
cash elections and stock elections that have been made by other
Intermountain shareholders. See The Merger
Election Procedures; Surrender of Stock Certificates. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I change my election? |
|
A: |
|
You may change your election at any time prior to the election
deadline by submitting to American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company written notice accompanied by a properly completed
and signed, revised election form. You may revoke your election
by submitting written notice to American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company prior to the election deadline
or by withdrawing your stock certificates prior to the election
deadline. Shareholders will not be entitled to change or revoke
their elections following the election deadline. |
|
Q: |
|
Will I receive any dividends? |
|
A: |
|
Before the merger takes place, Intermountain has agreed not to
pay any dividends to its shareholders. After the merger, any
dividends will be based on what Western Alliance pays. Western
Alliance has not paid dividends in the past and does not
presently intend to pay dividends. |
|
Q: |
|
How many votes are needed to approve the merger? |
|
A: |
|
A majority of the outstanding shares of Intermountains
common stock entitled to vote must vote in favor of the merger
agreement in order for it to be adopted and for the merger to be
approved. Accordingly, the failure of any holder of
Intermountain voting common stock to vote on this proposal will
have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Each of the
executive officers and directors as well as certain other
shareholders of Intermountain individually have entered into an
agreement with Western Alliance to vote their shares of
Intermountain voting common stock in favor of the merger
agreement and against any competing proposal. These shareholders
held approximately 67.8% of Intermountains outstanding
voting common stock as of December 31, 2005. |
iv
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
You should first carefully read this proxy statement/ prospectus. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you hold shares of Intermountain voting common
stock: |
|
|
|
After you have decided how to vote your shares,
please indicate on the enclosed proxy card how you want to vote,
and sign, date and return it as soon as possible in the enclosed
envelope. If you sign and send in your proxy card and do not
indicate how you want to vote, your proxy card will be voted FOR
approval of the merger agreement and the merger. Not returning a
proxy card, or not voting in person at the special meeting or
abstaining from voting, will have the same effect as voting
AGAINST the merger agreement and the merger. |
|
|
|
You can choose to attend the special meeting and
vote your shares in person instead of completing and returning a
proxy card. If you do complete and return a proxy card, you may
change your vote at any time up to and including the time of the
vote on the day of the special meeting by following the
directions in the section Revocability of Proxies. |
|
|
|
Whether you hold shares of Intermountain voting or
nonvoting common stock: |
|
|
|
You should complete and return the election form,
together with your stock certificate(s), to American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company according to the instructions
printed on the form. Do not send your Intermountain stock
certificates and/or your election form with your proxy card. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Who can vote? |
|
A: |
|
Intermountain has four series of common stock, two of which are
non-voting. Therefore, if you hold non-voting common stock or
Series A non-voting common stock, you are not entitled to
vote at the Intermountain special meeting. If you hold voting
common stock or Series A voting common stock (together,
Intermountain voting common stock), you are entitled
to vote at the Intermountain special meeting if you owned such
stock at the close of business on March 3, 2006. You will
have one vote for each share of Intermountain voting common
stock that you owned at that time. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I change my vote after I have mailed my signed proxy
card? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. There are three ways for you to revoke your proxy and
change your vote. First, you may send a written notice to the
Secretary of Intermountain at 777 N. Rainbow Boulevard
in Las Vegas, Nevada 89107, stating that you would like to
revoke your proxy. Second, you may complete and submit a new
proxy card. Third, you may vote in person at the special meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
When will the merger close? |
|
A: |
|
The merger is expected to close as soon as possible after the
receipt of Intermountain shareholder and regulatory approvals,
which is expected in the second quarter of 2006. However, we
cannot assure you when or if the merger will occur. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I do with my stock certificates? |
|
A: |
|
You should send your Intermountain common stock certificates to
the exchange agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, with your completed, signed election form prior to the
election deadline. If you do not send in the election form with
your stock certificates by the election deadline, you will be
deemed not to have made an election and you may receive cash,
Western Alliance common stock or a mixture of cash and stock,
for each share of your Intermountain common stock in the merger.
Please DO NOT send your stock certificates with your proxy card. |
|
Q: |
|
What needs to be done to complete the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Completion of the merger depends on a number of conditions being
met. In addition to compliance with the merger agreement, these
include: |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Approval of the merger agreement and merger by
Intermountain shareholders. |
|
|
|
2. Approval of the merger by federal and state regulatory
authorities. |
v
|
|
|
|
|
3. Approval by the New York Stock Exchange of listing of
Western Alliances common stock to be issued in the merger. |
|
|
|
4. The absence of any injunction or legal restraint
blocking the merger or government proceedings trying to block
the merger. |
|
|
|
5. Receipt by Intermountain of a satisfactory legal opinion
regarding certain tax matters. |
|
|
|
When the law permits, Western Alliance or Intermountain could
decide to complete the merger even though one or more of these
conditions has not been met. We cannot be certain when, or if,
the conditions to the merger will be satisfied or waived, or
that the merger will be completed. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Who can I call with questions or to obtain copies of this
proxy statement/ prospectus and other documents? |
|
A: |
|
William Bullard, Vice President of Intermountain, at
(702) 310-4000. |
|
|
|
|
|
A copy of the merger agreement including each of its exhibits
and the other documents described in this proxy statement/
prospectus will be provided to you promptly without charge if
you call or write to Dale Gibbons, Chief Financial Officer,
Western Alliance Bancorporation, 2700 West Sahara Avenue,
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102, Telephone: 702-248-4200. Such
documents were also filed as exhibits to the registration
statement filed with the SEC to register the shares of Western
Alliances common stock to be issued in the merger. See
Where You Can Find More Information. |
vi
SUMMARY
The following is a summary of information located elsewhere
in this document. It does not contain all of the information
that is important to you. Before you vote, you should give
careful consideration to all of the information contained in
this document to fully understand the merger. See Where
You Can Find More Information on page 138. Each item
in this summary refers to the page where that subject is
discussed in more detail.
General
Western Alliance and Intermountain have entered into an
agreement and plan of merger. Under the agreement, Intermountain
will merge with and into Western Alliance, with Western Alliance
surviving (referred to herein as the merger).
Following the merger, Nevada First Bank, a Nevada-chartered bank
and a wholly owned subsidiary of Intermountain, will merge with
and into BankWest of Nevada, a
Nevada-chartered bank
and a wholly owned subsidiary of Western Alliance, with BankWest
of Nevada being the surviving bank; this transaction is referred
to as the bank merger. Western Alliance may decide,
at its discretion, to delay the bank merger indefinitely.
The Companies Involved in the Merger (page 106)
Western Alliance Bancorporation is a Nevada corporation and is
the parent company of BankWest of Nevada, Alliance Bank of
Arizona, Torrey Pines Bank, Miller/ Russell &
Associates, and Premier Trust. Western Alliance is headquartered
in Las Vegas, Nevada with its principal executive office at
2700 West Sahara Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89102, Tel:
(702) 248-4200. Western Alliance provides a full range of
banking and related services to locally owned businesses,
professional firms, real estate developers and investors, local
non-profit organizations, high net worth individuals and other
consumers through subsidiary banks and financial services
companies located in Nevada, Arizona and California. On a
consolidated basis, as of September 30, 2005, Western
Alliance had approximately $2.7 billion in assets,
$1.6 billion in total loans, $2.3 billion in deposits
and $238.3 million in stockholders equity. For a
description of the business of Western Alliance, please see
Information about Western Alliance.
Intermountain First Bancorp is a Nevada corporation.
Intermountain is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada with its
principal executive office at 777 N. Rainbow
Boulevard, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107,
Tel: (702) 310-4000. Intermountain is the parent
company of Nevada First Bank, a Nevada-chartered bank. Nevada
First provides a full range of traditional banking services,
with special emphasis on serving the banking needs of the
greater Las Vegas, Nevada areas business community. On a
consolidated basis, as of December 31, 2005, Intermountain
had approximately $459.4 million in assets,
$374.2 million in total loans, $395.5 million in
deposits and $31.7 million in stockholders equity.
For a description of the business of Intermountain, please see
Information about Intermountain.
Merger Consideration (page 110)
If the merger takes place, you may elect to receive either
2.44 shares of Western Alliance common stock or $71.30 in
cash, or some combination thereof, for each share of
Intermountain common stock you own, unless you exercise your
dissenters rights. Each outstanding Intermountain stock
option will be converted into an option to
purchase 2.44 shares of Western Alliance common stock.
You will have the opportunity to elect the form of consideration
to be received for your shares, subject to proration and
allocation procedures set forth in the merger agreement which
are intended to ensure that at least 60% of the outstanding
shares of Intermountain common stock will be converted into
shares of Western Alliance common stock.
Intermountain Shareholders Election of Cash or Stock
Consideration (page 111)
If you own Intermountain common stock, you will soon receive
under separate cover an election form that you may use to
indicate whether your preference is to receive cash or shares of
new Western Alliance common stock. The election deadline will be
5:00 p.m., New York time, on March 27, 2006, the day
prior to the date of the special meeting (the election
deadline). To make an election, a holder of Intermountain
1
common stock must submit a properly completed election form and
return it, together with all stock certificates, so that the
form and certificates are actually received by the exchange
agent at or before the election deadline in accordance with the
instructions on the election form. Intermountain shareholders
will be unable to sell their Intermountain stock from the time
when the election is made until the merger is completed.
Non-Electing Shares (page 112)
Intermountain shareholders who make no election to receive cash
or Western Alliance common stock in the merger, and
Intermountain shareholders who do not make a valid election,
will be deemed not to have made an election. Shareholders not
making an election may be paid in cash, Western Alliance common
stock or a mix of cash and shares of Western Alliance common
stock depending on, and after giving effect to, the number of
valid cash elections and stock elections that have been made by
other Intermountain stockholders.
Material Federal Income Tax Consequences (page 125)
Those Intermountain shareholders who receive both Western
Alliance common stock and cash for their Intermountain common
stock will generally recognize gain equal to the lesser of
(1) the amount of cash received and (2) the excess of
the amount realized in the transaction (i.e.,
the fair market value of the Western Alliance common stock at
the effective time of the merger plus the amount of cash
received), over their tax basis in their Intermountain common
stock. We expect the transaction to be tax-free to holders of
Intermountain common stock for United States federal income tax
purposes to the extent that they receive solely shares of
Western Alliance common stock pursuant to the merger. Those
holders receiving solely cash for their Intermountain common
stock will generally recognize gain or loss equal to the
difference between the amount of cash received and their tax
basis in their shares of Intermountain common stock. Different
tax consequences may apply to you because of your individual
circumstances or because special tax rules apply to you, for
example, if you:
|
|
|
|
|
are a tax-exempt organization; |
|
|
|
are a mutual fund; |
|
|
|
are a dealer in securities or foreign currencies; |
|
|
|
are a bank or other financial institution; |
|
|
|
are an insurance company; |
|
|
|
are a non-United States person; |
|
|
|
are subject to the alternative minimum tax; |
|
|
|
are a trader in securities who elects to apply a
mark-to-market method
of accounting; |
|
|
|
acquired your shares of Intermountains common stock from
the exercise of options or otherwise as compensation or through
a qualified retirement plan; |
|
|
|
hold shares of Intermountains common stock as part of a
straddle, hedge, constructive sale or conversion
transaction; or |
|
|
|
do not hold shares of Intermountains common stock as
capital assets. |
|
|
|
Tax matters are very complicated. You should consult your
tax advisor for a full explanation of the tax consequences of
the merger to you. |
Intermountain Board of Directors Recommends Approval
(page 107)
The Intermountain Board of Directors unanimously approved the
merger agreement and the merger and unanimously recommends that
all holders of Intermountain voting common stock vote FOR
approval of these matters.
2
Dissenters Appraisal Rights in the Merger
(page 121)
Under Nevada law, you are entitled to dissenters rights of
appraisal in connection with the merger. If you want to assert
your appraisal rights, you must follow carefully the procedures
described at Appendix B, and summarized beginning on
page 121 of this document.
Differences in the Rights of Shareholders (page 135)
The rights of Intermountain shareholders who continue as Western
Alliance shareholders after the merger will be governed by the
articles of incorporation and bylaws of Western Alliance rather
than the articles of incorporation and bylaws of Intermountain.
These rights will continue to be governed by the laws of Nevada,
as the state of both Western Alliances and
Intermountains incorporation.
Intermountains Officers and Directors Have Interests in
the Merger Which May Be Different From Yours (page 123)
At the close of business on December 31, 2005, excluding
all options to purchase Intermountain common stock,
Intermountains directors and executive officers and their
affiliates owned a total of 860,587 shares of
Intermountains common stock, which was approximately 66%
of the total number of shares of Intermountains common
stock that were outstanding on that date. Each of
Intermountains directors, executive officers and certain
of its stockholders, representing approximately 67.8% of
Intermountains common stock, has agreed to vote his or her
shares in favor of the merger agreement and merger.
Additionally, some of Intermountains directors and
executive officers may have interests in the merger as directors
and employees that may be different from yours as an
Intermountain shareholder. These interests include rights of
executive officers under change of control and severance
agreements with Intermountain, rights under stock-based benefit
programs and awards of Intermountain, and rights to continued
indemnification and insurance coverage by Western Alliance after
the merger for acts or omissions occurring before the merger.
Following the completion of the merger, the board of directors
of Western Alliance will appoint to its board of directors a
representative of Intermountain who shall have been, immediately
prior to the effective time, either a member of
Intermountains board of directors or a holder of at least
5% of the capital stock of Intermountain. Also, following the
bank merger, BankWest of Nevada will invite all of the members
of Nevada Firsts board of directors to join the board of
directors of BankWest of Nevada. The Intermountain board of
directors was aware of these interests and considered them in
approving the merger agreement and the merger.
Regulatory Approvals We Must Obtain to Complete the Merger
(page 112)
For the merger to take place, we need to receive the regulatory
approvals of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, the Nevada Financial Institutions Division and the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. We have filed
applications with these regulators.
As of the date of this document, we have not yet received the
required approvals. We cannot be certain when or if we will
obtain them.
Termination of the Merger Agreement (page 119)
The merger agreement specifies a number of situations when
Western Alliance and Intermountain may terminate the merger
agreement. For example, the merger agreement may be terminated
at any time prior to the effective time by our mutual consent
and by either of us under specified circumstances, including if
the merger is not consummated by July 31, 2006, if we do
not receive the necessary shareholder or regulatory approvals or
if the other party breaches its agreements.
3
Information About the Special Meeting (page 16)
A special meeting of Intermountain shareholders will be held at
10:00 a.m. local time on March 28, 2006, at its
principal executive offices at 777 N. Rainbow
Boulevard, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107 for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
to vote on the merger agreement, the merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement; and |
|
|
|
to address any other matters that properly come before the
special meeting, or any adjournments or postponements of the
meeting, including a motion to adjourn the special meeting to
another time and/or place to solicit additional proxies in favor
of the merger agreement and the merger or otherwise. |
Share Information and Market Prices (page 137)
Western Alliances common stock is traded on the New York
Stock Exchange under the trading symbol WAL. The
table below presents the per share closing prices of Western
Alliances common stock as of December 29, 2005, the
last trading date before execution of the merger agreement and
March 1, 2006, the last practicable day before the date of
this proxy statement/ prospectus. The table also shows the
implied value per share of Intermountain common stock which is
calculated by valuing the Western Alliance common stock at the
relevant date below per share and multiplying this value by the
exchange ratio of 2.44. For more information about the exchange
ratio, see The Merger Merger
Consideration, and for more information about the stock
prices and dividends of Western Alliance and Intermountain, see
Market Prices and Dividends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Reported Sale Price of |
|
|
|
|
Western Alliances |
|
Implied Value |
Date |
|
Common Stock |
|
per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
December 29, 2005
|
|
$ |
29.40 |
|
|
$ |
71.74 |
|
March 1, 2006
|
|
$ |
36.01 |
|
|
$ |
87.86 |
|
The market price of Western Alliances common stock will
fluctuate between the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus
and the date on which the merger takes place.
Intermountains shareholders are advised to obtain current
market quotations for Western Alliances common stock. The
total dollar value of the Western Alliance common stock that an
Intermountain stockholder will be entitled to receive as a
result of the merger may be significantly higher or lower than
its current value. No assurance can be given as to the market
price of Western Alliances common stock at the time of the
merger.
4
Comparative Unaudited Per Share Data
The following table shows information, at and for the period
indicated, about Western Alliances and
Intermountains historical book value per share, tangible
book value per share and earnings per share. The table also
contains pro forma information that reflects the merger of
Western Alliance and Intermountain using the purchase method of
accounting. The unaudited pro forma equivalent information was
obtained by multiplying the combined company pro forma
information by the exchange ratio for each share of
Intermountain common stock, which is 2.44. The combined company
and pro forma equivalent information has been provided assuming
that, on an aggregate basis, the Intermountain stockholders
elect to receive Western Alliance common stock in the merger
with respect to 60% and 100% of the Intermountain shares they
hold. Neither Western Alliance nor Intermountain has ever paid a
cash dividend on its common stock and neither company
anticipates paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
You should read the information in the following table in
conjunction with Western Alliances consolidated financial
statements and related notes for the years ended
December 31, 2002 through 2004 and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 that are included in this
joint proxy statement/ prospectus and from which this
information is derived. You should not rely on the pro forma
information as being indicative of the results that Western
Alliance will achieve in the transaction. See also Where
You Can Find More Information on page 138.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
Book value per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Western Alliance historical
|
|
$ |
10.71 |
|
Intermountain historical
|
|
|
21.32 |
|
Combined 60% stock election
|
|
|
12.35 |
|
Combined 100% stock election
|
|
|
13.30 |
|
Intermountain pro forma equivalent 60% stock election
|
|
|
30.15 |
|
Intermountain pro forma equivalent 100% stock
election
|
|
|
32.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible book value per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Western Alliance historical
|
|
$ |
10.48 |
|
Intermountain historical
|
|
|
21.32 |
|
Combined 60% stock election
|
|
|
9.06 |
|
Combined 100% stock election
|
|
|
10.19 |
|
Intermountain pro forma equivalent 60% stock election
|
|
|
22.10 |
|
Intermountain pro forma equivalent 100% stock election
|
|
|
24.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Western Alliance historical
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
Intermountain historical
|
|
|
3.30 |
|
Combined 60% stock election
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
Combined 100% stock election
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
Intermountain pro forma equivalent 60% stock election
|
|
|
3.34 |
|
Intermountain pro forma equivalent 100% stock
election
|
|
|
3.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Western Alliance historical
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
Intermountain historical
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
Combined 60% stock election
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
Combined 100% stock election
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
Intermountain pro forma equivalent 60% stock election
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
Intermountain pro forma equivalent 100% stock
election
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
5
CAUTIONARY NOTE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements contained in Summary,
Risk Factors, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
Business and elsewhere in this proxy statement/
prospectus constitute forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs,
projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or
trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not
historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward
looking statements by terms such as may,
will, should, expect,
intend, plan, anticipate,
believe, estimate, predict,
potential or the negative of these terms or other
comparable terminology.
The forward-looking statements contained in this proxy
statement/ prospectus reflect our current views about future
events and financial performance and are subject to risks,
uncertainties, assumptions and changes in circumstances that may
cause our actual results to differ significantly from historical
results and those expressed in any forward-looking statement,
including those risks discussed under the heading Risk
Factors in this proxy statement/ prospectus. Some factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from
historical or expected results include:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or
locally in the areas in which we conduct or will conduct our
business; |
|
|
|
inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; |
|
|
|
the inability to obtain the regulatory approvals for the merger
on acceptable terms, on the anticipated schedule or at all; |
|
|
|
lower revenues following the merger than we expect; |
|
|
|
changes in gaming or tourism in our primary market area; |
|
|
|
risks associated with our growth and expansion strategy and
related costs; |
|
|
|
increased lending risks associated with our high concentration
of commercial real estate, construction and land development and
commercial, industrial loans; |
|
|
|
increases in competitive pressures among financial institutions
and businesses offering similar products and services; |
|
|
|
higher defaults on our loan portfolio than we expect; |
|
|
|
changes in managements estimate of the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses; |
|
|
|
legislative or regulatory changes or changes in accounting
principles, policies or guidelines; |
|
|
|
managements estimates and projections of interest rates
and interest rate policy; |
|
|
|
the execution of our business plan; and |
|
|
|
other factors affecting the financial services industry
generally or the banking industry in particular. |
For more information regarding risks that may cause our actual
results to differ materially from any forward-looking
statements, see Risk Factors. We do not intend and
disclaim any duty or obligation to update or revise any industry
information or forward-looking statements set forth in this
proxy statement/ prospectus to reflect new information, future
events or otherwise, except as may be required by the securities
laws.
6
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information included in this proxy
statement/ prospectus (including the matters addressed in
Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking
Statements), you should carefully consider the matters
described below in determining whether to approve the merger
agreement and whether to make a cash or stock election. Any of
these risks could have an adverse effect on Western
Alliances business, financial condition, results of
operations or prospects, which could in turn affect the price of
its shares.
Risks Related to the Merger
The integration of the companies will present significant
challenges that may result in the combined business not
operating as effectively as expected or in the failure to
achieve some or all of the anticipated benefits of the
transaction.
The benefits and synergies expected to result from the proposed
transaction will depend in part on whether the operations of
Intermountain can be integrated in a timely and efficient manner
with those of Western Alliance. Western Alliance will face
challenges in consolidating its functions with those of
Intermountain, and integrating the organizations, procedures and
operations of the two businesses. The integration of Western
Alliance and Intermountain will be complex and time-consuming,
and the management of both companies will have to dedicate
substantial time and resources to it. These efforts could divert
managements focus and resources from other strategic
opportunities and from
day-to-day operational
matters during the integration process. Failure to successfully
integrate the operations of Western Alliance and Intermountain
could result in the failure to achieve some of the anticipated
benefits from the transaction, including cost savings and other
operating efficiencies, and could have an adverse effect on the
business, results of operations, financial condition or
prospects of Western Alliance after the transaction.
The price of Western Alliance common stock will fluctuate
before and after the merger, which could increase or decrease
the value of the merger consideration received by Intermountain
shareholders receiving Western Alliance common stock.
On December 29, 2005, the day before the merger agreement
was executed, the closing price of a share of Western Alliance
common stock was $29.40. On March 1, 2006, the most recent
practicable date before the mailing of this proxy statement/
prospectus, the closing price was $36.01. Based on these closing
prices and the 2.44 exchange ratio, the implied value of the
merger consideration consisting of Western Alliance common stock
was $71.74 on December 29, 2005 and $87.86 on March 1,
2006. The price of Western Alliance common stock may increase or
decrease before and after completion of the merger. Therefore,
the market value of Western Alliance common stock received by an
Intermountain shareholder in connection with the merger could be
lower than the market value of Western Alliance stock on
December 29, 2005, March 1, 2006 or the closing date
of the merger, and the market value of the stock consideration
could be less than the $71.30 cash consideration received by
shareholders receiving the cash consideration. The market value
of Western Alliance common stock received by an Intermountain
shareholder in connection with the merger could also be higher
than those trading prices, and shareholders receiving the cash
consideration could receive cash worth less than the market
value of the stock consideration. The market price of Western
Alliance stock fluctuates based upon general market economic
conditions, Western Alliances business and prospects and
other factors.
Shareholders may receive a form of consideration different
from what they elect.
While each Intermountain shareholder may elect to receive cash
or Western Alliance common stock in the merger, at least 60% of
the Intermountain common stock outstanding at the completion of
the merger will be converted into Western Alliance common stock.
Therefore, if Intermountain shareholders elect more cash than is
available under the merger agreement, their elections will be
prorated to permit at least 60% of the Intermountain common
stock outstanding at the completion of the merger to be
converted into Western Alliance
7
common stock. As a result, if a cash election proves to be more
popular among Intermountain shareholders, and you choose the
cash election, you might receive a portion of your consideration
in the form of stock.
If you tender shares of Intermountain common stock to make an
election, you will not be able to transfer those shares until
after the merger, unless you revoke your election prior to the
election deadline.
To make a cash or stock election, you must deliver your stock
certificate(s) to the exchange agent. The deadline for doing
this is 5:00 p.m. New York City time, on March 27,
2006, the day before the special meeting of shareholders. You
will not be able to sell any shares of Intermountain common
stock that you have delivered, unless you revoke your election
before the deadline by providing written notice to the exchange
agent. If you do not revoke your election, you will not be able
to liquidate your investment in Intermountain common stock for
any reason until you receive cash or Western Alliance common
stock, or both, in the merger. During the period between
delivery of your shares and the closing of the merger, the
trading price of Western Alliance common stock may decrease.
The date that you will receive your merger consideration depends
on the completion date of the merger, which is expected to occur
in the second quarter of 2006. The completion date of the merger
might be later than expected due to unforeseen events, such as
delays in obtaining regulatory approvals.
The merger agreement limits Intermountains ability to
pursue alternatives to the merger.
The merger agreement contains terms and conditions that make it
more difficult for Intermountain to sell its business to a party
other than Western Alliance. These no shop
provisions impose restrictions on Intermountain that, subject to
certain exceptions, limit Intermountains ability to
discuss or facilitate competing third-party proposals to acquire
all or a significant part of Intermountain.
In addition, the board of directors of Intermountain has agreed
that it will not, directly or indirectly, facilitate or
recommend a competing acquisition proposal, subject to limited
exceptions. While the board of directors could take such actions
if it determined that the failure to do so would violate its
fiduciary duties, doing so would entitle Western Alliance to
terminate the merger agreement and may entitle it to receive a
termination fee. Intermountain will also be required to pay the
termination fee if a competing acquisition proposal has been
made known to Intermountain or its shareholders and the merger
agreement is subsequently terminated for a variety of reasons
(including because Intermountain shareholders fail to approve
the merger or because Intermountain willfully breaches the
merger agreement), and Intermountain completes, or enters into
an agreement for, an alternative acquisition transaction during
the 12 months after the termination of the merger agreement.
Western Alliance required Intermountain to agree to these
provisions as a condition to Western Alliances willingness
to enter into the merger agreement. However, these provisions
might discourage a third party that might have an interest in
acquiring all or a significant part of Intermountain from
considering or proposing that acquisition even if it were
prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share market
price than the current proposed merger consideration, and the
termination fee might result in a potential competing acquirer
proposing to pay a lower per share price to acquire
Intermountain than it might otherwise have proposed to pay.
Intermountains executive officers and directors have
interests in the merger that are different from your interest as
an Intermountain shareholder.
Intermountain executive officers negotiated the merger agreement
with Western Alliance, and the board of directors approved the
agreement and is recommending that Intermountain shareholders
who are entitled to vote, vote for the agreement. In considering
these facts and the other information contained in this proxy
statement/ prospectus, you should be aware that
Intermountains executive officers and directors have
interests in the merger in addition to the interests that they
share with you as an Intermountain shareholder. As described in
detail under the heading Interests of Intermountain
Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger That are
Different Than Yours, there are substantial interests to
be conveyed to each director and executive officer of
Intermountain as a result of the accelerated vesting or
additional issuance of stock options, as well as other
considerations. Following the completion of the merger, the
board of directors of Western
8
Alliance will appoint to its board of directors a representative
of Intermountain who shall have been, immediately prior to the
effective time, either a member of Intermountains board of
directors or a holder of at least 5% of the capital stock of
Intermountain. Also, following the bank merger, BankWest of
Nevada will invite all of the members of Nevada Firsts
board of directors to join the board of directors of BankWest of
Nevada.
Risk Factors Related to an Investment in Western Alliance
Our current primary market area is substantially dependent on
gaming and tourism revenue, and a downturn in gaming or tourism
could hurt our business and our prospects.
Our business is currently concentrated in the Las Vegas
metropolitan area. The economy of the Las Vegas metropolitan
area is unique in the United States for its level of dependence
on services and industries related to gaming and tourism. Any
event that negatively impacts the gaming or tourism industry
will adversely impact the Las Vegas economy.
Gaming and tourism revenue (whether or not such tourism is
directly related to gaming) is vulnerable to fluctuations in the
national economy. A prolonged downturn in the national economy
could have a significant adverse effect on the economy of the
Las Vegas area. Virtually any development or event that could
dissuade travel or spending related to gaming and tourism,
whether inside or outside of Las Vegas, could adversely affect
the Las Vegas economy. In this regard, the Las Vegas economy is
more susceptible than the economies of other cities to issues
such as higher gasoline and other fuel prices, increased
airfares, unemployment levels, recession, rising interest rates,
and other economic conditions, whether domestic or foreign.
Gaming and tourism are also susceptible to certain political
conditions or events, such as military hostilities and acts of
terrorism, whether domestic or foreign. A terrorist act, or the
mere threat of a terrorist act, may adversely affect gaming and
tourism and the Las Vegas economy and may cause substantial harm
to our business.
In addition, Las Vegas competes with other areas of the country
for gaming revenue, and it is possible that the expansion of
gaming operations in other states, such as California, as a
result of changes in laws or otherwise, could significantly
reduce gaming revenue in the Las Vegas area.
Although we have no substantial customer relationships in the
gaming and tourism industries, a downturn in the Las Vegas
economy, generally, could have an adverse effect on our
customers and result in an increase in loan delinquencies and
foreclosures, a reduction in the demand for our products and
services and a reduction of the value of our collateral for
loans which could result in the reduction of a customers
borrowing power, any of which could adversely affect our
business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects.
We may not be able to continue our growth at the rate we have
in the past several years.
We have grown substantially, from having one chartered bank with
$443.7 million in total assets and $410.2 million in
total deposits as of December 31, 2000, to three chartered
banks with $2.7 billion in total assets and
$2.3 billion in total deposits as of September 30,
2005. If we are unable to effectively execute on our strategy,
we may not be able to continue to grow at our historical rates.
In particular, Alliance Bank of Arizona and Torrey Pines Bank
have achieved unusually high annual rates of growth as compared
to other recently opened de novo banks. We do not expect
this high level of growth at Alliance Bank of Arizona and Torrey
Pines Bank to continue in the future.
Our growth and expansion strategy may not prove to be
successful and our market value and profitability may suffer.
Growth through acquisitions of banks or the organization of new
banks in high-growth markets, especially in markets outside of
our current markets, represents an important component of our
business strategy. In addition to our agreement to acquire
Intermountain, we recently entered into an agreement to acquire
Bank of Nevada. For more information regarding this acquisition,
see Recent Developments. Both of these
9
acquisitions, as well as any future acquisitions, will be
accompanied by the risks commonly encountered in acquisitions.
These risks include, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulty of integrating the operations and personnel; |
|
|
|
potential disruption of our ongoing business; and |
|
|
|
inability of our management to maximize our financial and
strategic position by the successful implementation of uniform
product offerings and the incorporation of uniform technology
into our product offerings and control systems. |
We expect that competition for suitable acquisition candidates
may be significant. We may compete with other banks or financial
service companies with similar acquisition strategies, many of
which are larger and have greater financial and other resources.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully
identify and acquire suitable acquisition targets on acceptable
terms and conditions.
In addition to the acquisition of existing financial
institutions, we may consider the organization of new banks in
new market areas. We do not have any current plan to organize a
new bank. Any acquisition or organization of a new bank carries
with it numerous risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the inability to obtain all required regulatory approvals; |
|
|
|
significant costs and anticipated operating losses during the
application and organizational phases, and the first years of
operation of the new bank; |
|
|
|
the inability to secure the services of qualified senior
management; |
|
|
|
the local market may not accept the services of a new bank owned
and managed by a bank holding company headquartered outside of
the market area of the new bank; |
|
|
|
the inability to obtain attractive locations within a new market
at a reasonable cost; and |
|
|
|
the additional strain on management resources and internal
systems and controls. |
We cannot assure you that we will be successful in overcoming
these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with
acquisitions and the organization of new banks. Our inability to
overcome these risks could have an adverse effect on our ability
to achieve our business strategy and maintain our market value
and profitability growth.
The combined companys status as a holding company makes
it dependent on dividends from its subsidiaries to meet its
obligations.
After the merger, Western Alliance will continue to be a holding
company that conducts almost all of its operations through its
subsidiaries. The combined company will not have significant
assets other than the stock of its subsidiaries. Accordingly,
the combined company will depend on dividends from its
subsidiaries to meet its obligations. The combined
companys right to participate in any distribution of
earnings or assets of its subsidiaries is subject to the prior
claims of creditors of such subsidiaries. Under federal and
state law, a subsidiary is limited in the amount of dividends it
may pay to its parent without prior regulatory approval. Also,
bank regulators have the authority to prohibit a subsidiary from
paying dividends if the bank regulators determine that such
subsidiary is in an unsafe or unsound condition or that the
payment would be an unsafe and unsound bank practice.
If we continue to grow rapidly as planned, we may not be able
to control costs and maintain our asset quality.
We expect to continue to grow our assets and deposits, the
products and services which we offer and the scale of our
operations, generally, both internally and through acquisitions.
Our ability to manage our growth successfully will depend on our
ability to maintain cost controls and asset quality while
attracting additional loans and deposits on favorable terms. If
we grow too quickly and are not able to control costs and
maintain asset quality, this rapid growth could materially
adversely affect our financial performance.
10
We may have difficulty managing our growth, which may divert
resources and limit our ability to successfully expand our
operations.
Our rapid growth has placed, and it may continue to place,
significant demands on our operations and management. Our future
success will depend on the ability of our officers and other key
employees to continue to implement and improve our operational,
credit, financial, management and other internal risk controls
and processes and our reporting systems and procedures, and to
manage a growing number of client relationships. We may not
successfully implement improvements to our management
information and control systems and control procedures and
processes in an efficient or timely manner and may discover
deficiencies in existing systems and controls. In particular,
our controls and procedures must be able to accommodate an
increase in expected loan volume and the infrastructure that
comes with new branches and banks. Thus, our growth strategy may
divert management from our existing businesses and may require
us to incur additional expenditures to expand our administrative
and operational infrastructure. If we are unable to manage
future expansion in our operations, we may experience compliance
and operational problems, have to slow the pace of growth, or
have to incur additional expenditures beyond current projections
to support such growth, any one of which could adversely affect
our business.
Our future growth is dependent upon our ability to recruit
additional, qualified employees, especially seasoned
relationship bankers.
Our market areas are experiencing a period of rapid growth,
placing a premium on highly qualified employees in a number of
industries, including the financial services industry. Our
business plan includes, and is dependent upon, hiring and
retaining highly qualified and motivated executives and
employees at every level. In particular, our success has been
partly the result of our managements ability to seek and
retain highly qualified relationship bankers that have
long-standing relationships in their communities. These
professionals bring with them valuable customer relationships,
and have been an integral part of our ability to attract
deposits and to expand rapidly in our market areas. We expect to
experience substantial competition in our endeavor to identify,
hire and retain the top-quality employees that we believe are
key to our future success. If we are unable to hire and retain
qualified employees, we may not be able to grow our franchise
and successfully execute our business strategy.
We are highly dependent on real estate and events that
negatively impact the real estate market could hurt our
business.
A significant portion of our loan portfolio is dependent on real
estate. As of September 30, 2005, real estate related loans
accounted for approximately 80% of total loans. Our financial
condition may be adversely affected by a decline in the value of
the real estate securing our loans. In addition, acts of nature,
including earthquakes, fires and floods, which may cause
uninsured damage and other loss of value to real estate that
secures these loans, may also negatively impact our financial
condition.
In addition, as of September 30, 2005, 18.2% of our total
deposits consisted of non-interest bearing demand deposits
maintained by title insurance companies. A slowdown in real
estate activity, particularly commercial real estate activity,
in the markets we serve may cause a decline in our deposit
growth and may negatively impact our financial condition.
Our high concentration of commercial real estate,
construction and land development and commercial, industrial
loans expose us to increased lending risks.
As of September 30, 2005, the composition of our loan
portfolio was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
commercial real estate loans of $655.0 million, or 40.4% of
total loans, |
|
|
|
construction and land development loans of $397.0 million,
or 24.5% of total loans, |
|
|
|
commercial and industrial loans of 307.0 million, or 19.0%
of total loans, |
|
|
|
residential real estate loans of $239.5 million, or 14.8%
of total loans, and |
|
|
|
consumer loans of $21.0 million, or 1.3% of total loans. |
11
Commercial real estate, construction and land development and
commercial and industrial loans, which comprised 83.9% of our
total loan portfolio as of September 30, 2005, expose us to
a greater risk of loss than our residential real estate and
consumer loans, which comprised 16.1% of our total loan
portfolio as of September 30, 2005. Commercial real estate
and land development loans typically involve larger loan
balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers
compared to residential loans. Consequently, an adverse
development with respect to one commercial loan or one credit
relationship may expose us to a significantly greater risk of
loss compared to an adverse development with respect to one
residential mortgage loan.
If we lost a significant portion of our low-cost deposits, it
would negatively impact our profitability.
Our profitability depends in part on our success in attracting
and retaining a stable base of low-cost deposits. As of
September 30, 2005, our deposit base was comprised of 44.7%
non-interest bearing deposits, of which 40.7% consisted of title
company deposits, 54.5% consisted of other business deposits and
4.8% consisted of consumer deposits. If we lost a significant
portion of these low-cost deposits, it would negatively impact
our profitability. We consider these deposits to be core
deposits. While we generally do not believe these deposits are
sensitive to
interest-rate
fluctuations, the competition for these deposits in our markets
is strong and if we lost a significant portion of these low-cost
deposits, it would negatively affect our profitability.
Many of our loans have been made recently, and in certain
circumstances there is limited repayment history against which
we can fully assess the adequacy of our allowance for loan
losses. If our allowance for loan losses is not adequate to
cover actual loan losses, our earnings will decrease.
The risk of nonpayment of loans is inherent in all lending
activities, and nonpayment, if it occurs, may negatively impact
our earnings and overall financial condition, as well as the
value of our common stock. Also, many of our loans have been
made over the last three years and in certain circumstances
there is limited repayment history against which we can fully
assess the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses. We make
various assumptions and judgments about the collectibility of
our loan portfolio and provide an allowance for probable losses
based on several factors. If our assumptions are wrong, our
allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover our
losses, which would have an adverse effect on our operating
results. Additions to our allowance for loan losses decrease our
net income. While we have not experienced any significant
charge-offs or had large numbers of nonperforming loans, due to
the significant increase in loans originated during this period,
we cannot assure you that we will not experience an increase in
delinquencies and losses as these loans continue to mature. The
actual amount of future provisions for loan losses cannot be
determined at this time and may exceed the amounts of past
provisions.
Our future success will depend on our ability to compete
effectively in a highly competitive market.
We face substantial competition in all phases of our operations
from a variety of different competitors. Our competitors,
including commercial banks, community banks, savings and loan
associations, mutual savings banks, credit unions, consumer
finance companies, insurance companies, securities dealers,
brokers, mortgage bankers, investment advisors, money market
mutual funds and other financial institutions, compete with
lending and deposit-gathering services offered by us. Increased
competition in our markets may result in reduced loans and
deposits.
There is very strong competition for financial services in the
market areas in which we conduct our businesses from many local
commercial banks as well as numerous regionally based commercial
banks. Many of these competing institutions have much greater
financial and marketing resources than we have. Due to their
size, many competitors can achieve larger economies of scale and
may offer a broader range of products and services than us. If
we are unable to offer competitive products and services, our
earnings may be negatively affected.
Some of the financial services organizations with which we
compete are not subject to the same degree of regulation as is
imposed on bank holding companies and federally insured
financial institutions. As a result, these nonbank competitors
have certain advantages over us in accessing funding and in
providing various services. The banking business in our primary
market areas is very competitive, and the level of competition
12
facing us may increase further, which may limit our asset growth
and profitability. For more information on the competition we
have in our markets, see Information About Western
Alliance Business Strategy.
Our business would be harmed if we lost the services of any
of our senior management team or senior relationship bankers.
We believe that our success to date has been substantially
dependent on our senior management team, which includes Robert
Sarver, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Executive Officer of Torrey Pines Bank, Dale Gibbons, our
Chief Financial Officer, Larry Woodrum, President and Chief
Executive Officer of BankWest of Nevada and James Lundy,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Alliance Bank of
Arizona, and certain of our senior relationship bankers. We also
believe that our prospects for success in the future are
dependent on retaining our senior management team and senior
relationship bankers. In addition to their skills and experience
as bankers, these persons provide us with extensive community
ties upon which our competitive strategy is based. Our ability
to retain these persons may be hindered by the fact that we have
not entered into employment agreements with any of them. The
loss of the services of any of these persons, particularly
Mr. Sarver, could have an adverse effect on our business if
we cant replace them with equally qualified persons who
are also familiar with our market areas.
Mr. Sarvers involvement in outside business
interests requires substantial time and attention and may
adversely affect our ability to achieve our strategic plan and
maintain our current growth.
Mr. Sarver joined us in December of 2002 and has been an
integral part of our recent growth. He has substantial business
interests that are unrelated to us, including his ownership
interest in the Phoenix Suns NBA franchise.
Mr. Sarvers other business interests demand
substantial time commitments, and may reduce the amount of time
he has available to devote to our business. A significant
reduction in the amount of time Mr. Sarver devotes to our
business may adversely affect our ability to achieve our
strategic plan and maintain our current growth.
Adverse publicity or circumstances similar to that
experienced following the arrest and subsequent acquittal of our
Chief Financial Officer could generate negative publicity for
us, cause reputational harm and cause our stock price to
decline.
In June 2002, after a jury trial, Dale Gibbons was acquitted of
charges of possession of a controlled substance, dealing in
harmful material to a minor and endangerment of a child.
Following his acquittal, Mr. Gibbons filed a civil rights
lawsuit against numerous parties. In early 2005, the defendants
were granted summary judgment on substantially all of
Mr. Gibbons claims, and, subsequently, the parties
resolved the lawsuit and an order of dismissal was entered by
the U.S. District Court. There was extensive media coverage
of all of the events surrounding Mr. Gibbons arrest
and his subsequent resignation as the Chief Financial Officer of
his then employer, Zions Bancorporation. Before hiring
Mr. Gibbons as our Chief Financial Officer, our Audit
Committee engaged special legal counsel and an investigator to
assist in considering Mr. Gibbons prospective
employment with Western Alliance. We evaluated
Mr. Gibbons extensive banking background, reviewed
the legal and investigatory descriptions of the facts and
circumstances surrounding his arrest and consulted with the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Federal Reserve
Bank of San Francisco. Our Board of Directors determined
that Mr. Gibbons was suitable to serve as our Chief
Financial Officer. Subsequent to his hiring, our Board was
updated on the claims and information alleged against
Mr. Gibbons in the civil rights lawsuit. Also, in July
2005, we completed our initial public offering and listed our
common stock on the NYSE. Mr. Gibbons was an integral part
of that effort. Our Board continues to believe Mr. Gibbons
is suitable to serve as our Chief Financial Officer. However,
adverse publicity or circumstances, similar to that which
surrounded Mr. Gibbons arrest and trial in 2001 and
2002, could materially damage the publics perception of
us, and impair the reputations of Mr. Gibbons and Western
Alliance, and adverse public sentiment could affect the market
price of our common stock and our business.
13
A deterioration in economic conditions generally could
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of
operations and prospects.
A deterioration in economic conditions generally could adversely
affect our business, financial condition, results of operations
and prospects. Such a deterioration could result in a variety of
adverse consequences to us, including a reduction in net income
and the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Loan delinquencies, non-performing assets and foreclosures may
increase, which could result in higher operating costs, as well
as increases in our loan loss provisions; |
|
|
|
Demand for our products and services may decline, including the
demand for loans, which would adversely affect our
revenues; and |
|
|
|
Collateral for loans made by us may decline in value, reducing a
customers borrowing power, and reducing the value of
assets and collateral associated with our loans which would
cause decreases in net interest income and increasing loan loss
provisions. |
Economic conditions either nationally or locally in areas in
which our operations are concentrated may be less favorable than
expected.
Deterioration in local, regional, national or global economic
conditions could result in, among other things, an increase in
loan delinquencies, a decrease in property values, a change in
housing turnover rate or a reduction in the level of bank
deposits. Particularly, a weakening of the real estate or
employment market in our primary market areas of Las Vegas,
San Diego, Tucson and Phoenix could result in an increase
in the number of borrowers who default on their loans and a
reduction in the value of the collateral securing their loans,
which in turn could have an adverse effect on our profitability
and asset quality.
Terrorist attacks and threats of war or actual war may impact
all aspects of our operations, revenues, costs and stock price
in unpredictable ways.
Terrorist attacks in the United States, as well as future events
occurring in response or in connection to them including,
without limitation, future terrorist attacks against United
States targets, rumors or threats of war, actual conflicts
involving the United States or its allies or military or trade
disruptions, may impact our operations. Any of these events
could cause consumer confidence and savings to decrease or
result in increased volatility in the United States and
worldwide financial markets and economy. Any of these
occurrences could have an adverse impact on our operating
results, revenues and costs and may result in the volatility of
the market price for our common stock and impair its future
price.
We do not anticipate paying any dividends on our common
stock. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common
stock may be your sole source of gains in the future.
We have never paid a cash dividend, and do not anticipate paying
a cash dividend in the foreseeable future. As a result, you may
only receive a return on your investment in the common stock if
the market price of the common stock increases.
We may underestimate the impact of new reporting company
requirements.
We recently became a reporting company as a result of our
initial public offering in June, 2005. As a public company, we
have and will continue to incur significant accounting, legal
and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company.
In addition, the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, as well as new
rules implemented by the SEC and the NYSE, have required changes
to corporate governance practices of public companies. For
example, Section 404 of Sarbanes Oxley will require us to
evaluate and report on our internal controls over financial
reporting and have our independent auditors attest to our
evaluation, beginning with our annual report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2005. If we underestimate
the expense and resources spent by management involved in
complying with these regulations, our financial performance may
be adversely affected.
14
We have limited rights to use the BankWest of
Nevada mark.
Pursuant to a previous settlement agreement, we have agreed to
use the word BankWest only within the name and
service mark BankWest of Nevada. The settlement
agreement only covers our use of the mark in Clark and Nye
counties, Nevada. Our use of the mark BankWest of
Nevada outside of Clark or Nye counties could result in:
|
|
|
|
|
further claims of infringement, including costly litigation; |
|
|
|
an injunction prohibiting our proposed use of the mark; and |
|
|
|
the need to enter into licensing agreements, which may not be
available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. |
Nevada First Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary of Intermountain,
has a branch located in Reno, which is outside of Clark and Nye
counties. Following consummation of the Bank of Nevada
transaction, we intend to change the name of BankWest of Nevada
to Bank of Nevada. See Recent Developments of Western
Alliance for more information about the Bank of Nevada
transaction. If our use of the BankWest of Nevada
mark or any other similar mark is limited or prohibited, or we
are required to pay an additional license fee for such use, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Risks Related to the Banking Industry
We operate in a highly regulated environment; changes in laws
and regulations and accounting principles may adversely affect
us.
We are subject to extensive regulation, supervision, and
legislation which govern almost all aspects of our operations.
See Supervision and Regulation. The laws and
regulations applicable to the banking industry could change at
any time and are primarily intended for the protection of
customers, depositors and the deposit insurance funds. Any
changes to these laws or any applicable accounting principles
could make it more difficult and expensive for us to comply and
could affect the way that we conduct business, which may
negatively impact our results of operations and financial
condition. While we cannot predict what effect any presently
contemplated or future changes in the laws or regulations or
their interpretations would have on us, these changes could be
materially adverse to our investors and stockholders.
Changes in interest rates could adversely affect our
profitability, business and prospects.
Increases or decreases in prevailing interest rates could have
an adverse effect on our business, asset quality and prospects.
Our operating income and net income depend to a great extent on
our net interest margin. Net interest margin is the difference
between the interest yields we receive on loans, securities and
other interest earning assets and the interest rates we pay on
interest bearing deposits and other liabilities. These rates are
highly sensitive to many factors beyond our control, including
competition, general economic conditions and monetary and fiscal
policies of various governmental and regulatory authorities,
including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
referred to as the FRB. If the rate of interest we pay on our
interest bearing deposits and other liabilities increases more
than the rate of interest we receive on loans, securities and
other interest earning assets, our net interest income, and
therefore our earnings, could be adversely affected. Our
earnings could also be adversely affected if the rates on our
loans and other investments fall more quickly than those on our
deposits and other liabilities.
In addition, loan volumes are affected by market interest rates
on loans; rising interest rates generally are associated with a
lower volume of loan originations while lower interest rates are
usually associated with higher loan originations. Conversely, in
rising interest rate environments, loan repayment rates will
decline and in falling interest rate environments, loan
repayment rates will increase. We cannot assure you that we will
be able to minimize our interest rate risk. In addition, an
increase in the general level of interest rates may adversely
affect the ability of certain borrowers to pay the interest on
and principal of their obligations.
15
Interest rates also affect how much money we can lend. When
interest rates rise, the cost of borrowing increases.
Accordingly, changes in market interest rates could materially
and adversely affect our net interest spread, asset quality,
loan origination volume, business, financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows.
We are required to maintain an allowance for loan losses.
This allowance for loan losses may have to be adjusted in the
future. Any adjustment to the allowance for loan losses, whether
due to regulatory changes, economic changes or other factors,
may affect our financial condition and earnings.
We maintain an allowance for loan losses. The allowance is
established through a provision for loan losses based on our
managements evaluation of the risks inherent in our loan
portfolio and the general economy. The allowance is based upon a
number of factors, including the size of the loan portfolio,
asset classifications, economic trends, industry experience and
trends, industry and geographic concentrations, estimated
collateral values, managements assessment of the credit
risk inherent in the portfolio, historical loan loss experience
and loan underwriting policies. In addition, we evaluate all
loans identified as problem loans and augment the allowance
based upon the perceived risks associated with those problem
loans.
The federal regulators, in reviewing our loan portfolio as part
of a regulatory examination, may request us to increase our
allowance for loan losses, thereby negatively affecting our
financial condition and earnings at that time. Moreover,
additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in
economic and real estate market conditions, new information
regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem
loans and other factors, both within and outside of our
managements control.
We are exposed to risk of environmental liabilities with
respect to properties to which we take title.
About 80% of our outstanding loan portfolio as of
September 30, 2005 was secured by real estate. In the
course of our business, we may foreclose and take title to real
estate, and could be subject to environmental liabilities with
respect to these properties. We may be held liable to a
governmental entity or to third parties for property damage,
personal injury, investigation and
clean-up costs incurred
by these parties in connection with environmental contamination,
or may be required to investigate or clean up hazardous or toxic
substances, or chemical releases at a property. The costs
associated with investigation or remediation activities could be
substantial. In addition, if we are the owner or former owner of
a contaminated site, we may be subject to common law claims by
third parties based on damages and costs resulting from
environmental contamination emanating from the property. These
costs and claims could adversely affect our business and
prospects.
16
SHAREHOLDER MEETING
Matters to be Considered at the Special Meeting
We are first mailing this document to the holders of
Intermountains common stock on or about March 7,
2006. It is accompanied by a proxy card furnished in connection
with the solicitation of proxies by the Intermountain Board of
Directors for use at the special meeting of Intermountains
shareholders at 10.00 a.m. local time on Tuesday,
March 28, 2006, at its principal executive offices at
777 N. Rainbow Boulevard, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107. At
the special meeting, the holders of Intermountains voting
common stock will consider and vote on:
|
|
|
1. To adopt and approve an agreement and plan of merger,
pursuant to which Intermountain will merge with and into Western
Alliance Bancorporation (Western Alliance) with
Western Alliance surviving (referred to herein as the
merger). |
|
|
2. To transact any other business that properly comes
before the special meeting, or any adjournments or postponements
of the meeting, including, without limitation, a motion to
adjourn the special meeting to another time and/or place for the
purpose of soliciting additional proxies in order to approve the
merger agreement and the merger or otherwise. |
Eligible Votes
Intermountain has four series of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
voting common stock; |
|
|
|
non-voting common stock;. |
|
|
|
Series A voting common stock; and |
|
|
|
Series A non-voting common stock. |
The voting common stock and the Series A voting common
stock comprise Intermountains voting common stock.
Therefore, if you hold shares of either non-voting common stock
or Series A non-voting common stock, you are not entitled
to vote those shares at the special meeting of shareholders.
Record Date and Voting
The Intermountain Board of Directors has fixed the close of
business on March 3, 2006 as the record date for
determining the Intermountain shareholders entitled to receive
notice of and to vote at the special meeting. Only holders
of record of Intermountains voting common stock at the
close of business on that day will be entitled to vote at the
special meeting or at any adjournment or postponement of the
meeting. At the close of business on March 3, 2006, there
were 1,304,761 shares of Intermountains common stock
outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting, held by
approximately 98 shareholders of record.
Each holder of Intermountains voting common stock on
March 3, 2006 will be entitled to one vote for each share
held of record on each matter that is properly submitted at the
special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the
meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of
a majority of Intermountains common stock issued and
outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting is
necessary to constitute a quorum. Abstentions with respect to
shares of Intermountain voting common stock will be included in
the calculation of the number of shares represented at the
special meeting in order to determine whether a quorum has been
achieved. Since approval of the merger agreement requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the
shares of Intermountains voting common stock issued and
outstanding, abstentions with respect to shares of Intermountain
voting common stock will have the same effect as a vote against
the merger agreement.
If a quorum is not obtained, or if fewer shares of
Intermountains voting common stock are voted in favor of
the proposal for approval of the merger agreement than the
number required for approval, it is expected that the special
meeting will be adjourned to allow additional time for obtaining
additional proxies. In that event,
17
proxies will be voted to approve an adjournment, except for
proxies as to which instructions have been given to vote against
the merger agreement.
If you hold shares of Intermountain voting common stock and your
proxy card is properly executed and received by Intermountain in
time to be voted at the special meeting, the shares represented
by the proxy card will be voted in accordance with the
instructions marked on the proxy card. Executed proxies with
respect to shares of Intermountain voting common stock with no
instructions indicated on the proxy card will be voted FOR the
merger agreement and the merger.
The Intermountain board of directors is not aware of any other
matters that may properly come before the special meeting. If
any other matters properly come before the special meeting, the
persons named in the accompanying proxy will vote the shares
represented by all properly executed proxies on those matters as
determined by a majority of the Intermountain board of directors.
If you hold shares of Intermountain voting common stock, you are
requested to complete, date and sign the accompanying proxy form
and to return it promptly in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.
The enclosed proxy card is different from the election form that
you can use to elect to receive cash or stock in the merger. Do
not return your proxy card with the election form. For
information about the election form, see The
Merger-Election Procedures; Surrender of Stock
Certificates. To vote on the merger agreement, you need to
hold shares of Intermountain voting common stock and complete
the proxy card properly and return it in the enclosed envelope
or attend the special meeting and vote in person.
You should not forward any stock certificates with your
proxy card. If you complete an election form, you should
forward your Intermountain stock certificates to the exchange
agent with the election form. If you do not complete an election
form, if the merger takes place, Intermountain stock
certificates should be delivered in accordance with instructions
that will be sent to you by Western Alliances exchange
agent promptly after the effective time of the merger.
Required Vote; Revocability of Proxies
In order to approve and adopt the merger agreement, the merger
of Intermountain and Western Alliance and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, the holders of at least a
majority of the shares of Intermountains voting common
stock issued and outstanding on March 3, 2006, must
affirmatively vote FOR the merger agreement and the merger.
The required vote of Intermountains shareholders is
based on the total number of outstanding shares of
Intermountains common stock entitled to vote and not on
the number of shares which are actually voted. Not returning a
proxy card, not voting in person at the special meeting or
abstaining from voting all will have the same effect as voting
AGAINST the merger agreement and the merger.
The directors and executive officers and certain major
shareholders of Intermountain beneficially owned as of
December 31, 2005, a total of 885,132 shares of
Intermountains voting common stock (excluding all options
to purchase shares of Intermountains common stock), which
was approximately 67.8% of the outstanding shares of
Intermountains voting common stock on that date. The
directors and executive officers and certain major shareholders
have agreed to vote their shares in favor of the merger
agreement and the merger and against competing proposals.
If you submit a proxy card, attending the special meeting will
not automatically revoke your proxy. However, you may revoke a
proxy at any time before it is voted by:
|
|
|
|
|
delivering to the Secretary of Intermountain First Bancorp,
777 N. Rainbow Boulevard in Las Vegas, Nevada 89107, a
written notice of revocation before the special meeting, |
|
|
|
delivering to Intermountain a duly executed proxy bearing a
later date before the special meeting, or |
|
|
|
attending the special meeting and voting in person. |
18
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS OF WESTERN ALLIANCE
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Results for 2005 and the
Fourth Quarter of 2005
On January 17, 2006, Western Alliance announced its
unaudited consolidated financial results for 2005 and the fourth
quarter of 2005.
Total assets were $2.86 billion at December 31, 2005,
an increase of 31.3% from $2.18 billion at
December 31, 2004. Loans were $1.79 billion at
December 31, 2005, an increase of $605 million from
December 31, 2004. Deposits were $2.39 billion at
December 31, 2005, an increase of $638 million from
December 31, 2004. Stockholders equity increased
$111 million from December 31, 2004 to
$244 million at December 31, 2005, due primarily to
Western Alliances initial public offering in July 2005.
Western Alliance had 537 full-time equivalent employees and
16 full-service banking offices on December 31, 2005,
compared to 424 full-time equivalent employees and 13
offices on December 31, 2004.
Net Income. Net income was $28.1 million, or
$1.24 per diluted share, for 2005, compared with
$20.1 million, or $1.09 per diluted share, for 2004.
For the fourth quarter of 2005, net income was
$8.4 million, up 31.3% from $6.4 million for the
fourth quarter of 2004. Diluted earnings per share were $0.34
for the fourth quarter of 2005, compared to $0.33 for the same
period in 2004. Western Alliance closed its initial public
offering of 4.2 million shares on July 6, 2005, which
increased average shares outstanding in 2005 and resulted in net
proceeds of $85.1 million.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased 35.4%
to $28.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2005 from
$21.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2004. The interest
margin was 4.43% in the fourth quarter of 2005, compared to
4.20% in the fourth quarter of 2004.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses
was $2.0 million for the fourth quarter of 2005, compared
to $0.8 million for the fourth quarter of 2004.
Non-interest income. Non-interest income was
$3.4 million for the fourth quarter of 2005, up 33.3% from
$2.6 million for the same period in 2004.
Non-interest expense. Non-interest expense was
$17.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2005, up 32.4% from
$12.9 million for the same period in 2004.
The following tables contain selected consolidated financial and
other data of Western Alliance at the dates and for the periods
indicated. You should read this information in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements included in this document.
The information at and for the three months and year ended
December 31, 2005 is unaudited. However, in the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) which are necessary to fairly present the results
for the periods included have been made.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in millions) | |
Selected Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,857.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,176.8 |
|
Gross loans, including net deferred fees
|
|
|
1,793.4 |
|
|
|
1,188.5 |
|
Securities
|
|
|
680.5 |
|
|
|
788.6 |
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
131.1 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
Deposits
|
|
|
2,393.9 |
|
|
|
1,756.0 |
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
80.5 |
|
|
|
223.6 |
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
244.2 |
|
|
|
133.6 |
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the | |
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Selected Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$ |
38,975 |
|
|
$ |
27,075 |
|
|
$ |
134,910 |
|
|
$ |
90,855 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
10,360 |
|
|
|
5,936 |
|
|
|
32,568 |
|
|
|
19,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
28,615 |
|
|
|
21,139 |
|
|
|
102,342 |
|
|
|
71,135 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,962 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
26,653 |
|
|
|
20,388 |
|
|
|
96,163 |
|
|
|
67,221 |
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
2,552 |
|
|
|
12,138 |
|
|
|
8,726 |
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
17,050 |
|
|
|
12,873 |
|
|
|
64,864 |
|
|
|
44,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
13,006 |
|
|
|
10,067 |
|
|
|
43,437 |
|
|
|
31,018 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
4,564 |
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
15,372 |
|
|
|
10,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
8,442 |
|
|
$ |
6,429 |
|
|
$ |
28,065 |
|
|
$ |
20,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
10.71 |
|
|
|
7.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible book value per share
|
|
|
10.48 |
|
|
|
7.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the | |
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
For the | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Selected Performance Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets(1)
|
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
1.20 |
% |
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
1.05 |
% |
Return on average stockholders equity(1)
|
|
|
13.42 |
|
|
|
19.00 |
|
|
|
14.37 |
|
|
|
17.48 |
|
Net interest margin(1)
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
Net interest spread
|
|
|
3.43 |
|
|
|
3.57 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
53.25 |
|
|
|
54.34 |
|
|
|
56.66 |
|
|
|
56.26 |
|
Loan to deposit ratio
|
|
|
74.92 |
|
|
|
67.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible Common Equity
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
Leverage ratio
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Tier 1 Risk Based Capital
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Total Risk Based Capital
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
Asset Quality Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding(1)
|
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Non-accrual loans to gross loans
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
Non-accrual loans to total assets
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Loans past due 90 days and still accruing to total loans
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to gross loans
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Annualized for the three-month periods ended December 31,
2005 and 2004. |
Acquisition of Bank of Nevada
On January 16, 2006, Western Alliance and Bank of Nevada, a
Nevada-chartered bank, entered into a definitive merger
agreement, pursuant to which Bank of Nevada will merge with and
into BankWest of Nevada, a wholly owned subsidiary of Western
Alliance. Under the terms of the agreement, Bank of Nevada
shareholders will receive $80.187 in cash for each share of Bank
of Nevada common stock. Following completion of the merger,
BankWest of Nevada will be renamed Bank of Nevada. The
transaction is valued at approximately $74 million. As of
September 30, 2005, Bank of Nevada had total assets of
approximately $281 million, total loans of approximately
$214 million, total deposits of approximately
$253 million and stockholders equity was
approximately $24 million. The transaction, which is
subject to customary closing conditions, including approval from
the shareholders of Bank of Nevada and banking regulators, is
expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2006.
Acquisition of Office Building
On December 30, 2005, BankWest of Nevada acquired an office
building located at 2700 West Sahara Avenue, Las Vegas,
Nevada, for a purchase price of $16,300,000. The property, which
had previously been leased by BankWest of Nevada, serves as the
corporate headquarters for Western Alliance and BankWest of
Nevada.
21
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS OF INTERMOUNTAIN
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Results for 2005 (Compared
to 2004)
Total assets were $459.4 million at December 31, 2005,
an increase of 31.1% from $350.4 million at
December 31, 2004. Loans were $374.2 million at
December 31, 2005, an increase of $87 million from
December 31, 2004. Deposits were $395.5 million at
December 31, 2005, an increase of $90 million from
December 31, 2004. Stockholders equity increased
$7.1 million from December 31, 2004 to
$31.7 million at December 31, 2005, due primarily to
the earnings of Nevada First Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary.
Intermountain had 96 full-time equivalent employees and
five full-service banking offices on December 31, 2005,
compared to 75 full-time equivalent employees and four
offices on December 31, 2004.
Net Income. Net income was $4.9 million, or
$3.18 per diluted share, for 2005, compared with
$3.7 million, or $2.54 per diluted share, for 2004.
The increase in net income is primarily attributed to an
increase in interest earning assets in 2005.
The following tables contain selected consolidated financial and
other data of Intermountain at the dates and for the periods
indicated. The information at and for the year ended
December 31, 2005 is unaudited. However, in the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) which are necessary to fairly present the results
for the periods included have been made.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
Selected Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
459.4 |
|
|
$ |
350.4 |
|
Gross loans, including net deferred fees
|
|
|
374.2 |
|
|
|
287.2 |
|
Securities
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
Deposits
|
|
|
395.5 |
|
|
|
305.0 |
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
Selected Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$ |
27,866 |
|
|
$ |
18,647 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8,294 |
|
|
|
3,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
19,572 |
|
|
|
14,695 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
19,116 |
|
|
|
13,456 |
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
Non-interest expense(1)
|
|
|
12,695 |
|
|
|
8,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
7,895 |
|
|
|
5,639 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
2,991 |
|
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
4,904 |
|
|
$ |
3,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
3.30 |
|
|
$ |
2.68 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
21.32 |
|
|
|
17.77 |
|
Tangible book value per share
|
|
|
21.32 |
|
|
|
17.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Performance Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
|
1.21% |
|
|
|
1.05% |
|
Return on average stockholders equity
|
|
|
17.42 |
|
|
|
17.48 |
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
|
|
5.16 |
|
Net interest spread
|
|
|
4.18 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
43.08 |
|
|
|
44.74 |
|
Loan to deposit ratio
|
|
|
94.60 |
|
|
|
94.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible Common Equity
|
|
|
6.89% |
|
|
|
7.02% |
|
Leverage ratio
|
|
|
9.07 |
|
|
|
9.53 |
|
Tier 1 Risk Based Capital
|
|
|
9.39 |
|
|
|
9.38 |
|
Total Risk Based Capital
|
|
|
10.42 |
|
|
|
11.18 |
|
|
Asset Quality Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding
|
|
|
(0.03 |
)% |
|
|
0.04% |
|
Non-accrual loans to gross loans
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
Non-accrual loans to total assets
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
Loans past due 90 days and still accruing to total loans
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to gross loans
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
23
|
|
(1) |
Intermountain has agreed to pay a bonus to all
individuals who exercised options in 2005 that were originally
issued as incentive stock options (ISOs) but were
subsequently disqualified. This bonus of approximately $167,000
is intended to compensate these individuals for certain
tax-related costs of exercising non-incentive stock options. |
Corrective Bonus Payments and Option Rescission
Intermountain has agreed to pay a bonus to certain
individuals who exercised options in 2005, which options were
originally issued as incentive stock options but were
subsequently disqualified. This bonus is intended to compensate
these individuals for certain tax-related costs of exercising
non-incentive stock options. Intermountain will also pay
interest and penalties as a result of not making these tax
payments at the time these options were exercised. Intermountain
has also rescinded all unexercised stock option agreements
entered into in 2005 between Intermountain and its option
holders which were disqualified from being treated as incentive
stock options. The total amount of expense accrued in 2005 as a
result of these modifications and bonus payments was
approximately $656,000.
24
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
Set forth below are highlights from Western Alliances
consolidated financial data of and for the years ended
December 31, 2000 through 2004 and Western Alliances
unaudited consolidated financial data as of and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2004 and 2005. The results of
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 are
not necessarily indicative of the results of operations of
Western Alliance for the full year. Western Alliances
management prepared the unaudited information on the same basis
as it prepared Western Alliance audited consolidated financial
statements. In the opinion of Western Alliances
management, this information reflects all adjustments,
consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a
fair presentation of this data for these periods. You should
read this information in conjunction with Western
Alliances consolidated financial statements and related
notes for the years ended December 31, 2002 through 2004
and for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
that are included in this joint proxy statement/ prospectus and
from which this information is derived. See also Where You
Can Find More Information on page 138.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
($ in thousands, except per share data) | |
Selected Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,745,014 |
|
|
$ |
2,126,252 |
|
|
$ |
2,176,849 |
|
|
$ |
1,576,773 |
|
|
$ |
872,074 |
|
|
$ |
602,703 |
|
|
$ |
443,665 |
|
Loans receivable (net)
|
|
|
1,598,253 |
|
|
|
1,070,914 |
|
|
|
1,173,264 |
|
|
|
721,700 |
|
|
|
457,906 |
|
|
|
400,647 |
|
|
|
319,604 |
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
595,959 |
|
|
|
727,772 |
|
|
|
659,073 |
|
|
|
583,684 |
|
|
|
227,238 |
|
|
|
73,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity
|
|
|
117,116 |
|
|
|
125,606 |
|
|
|
129,549 |
|
|
|
132,294 |
|
|
|
5,610 |
|
|
|
6,055 |
|
|
|
7,604 |
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
203,999 |
|
|
|
22,800 |
|
|
|
23,115 |
|
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
|
113,789 |
|
|
|
73,099 |
|
|
|
62,100 |
|
Deposits
|
|
|
2,347,498 |
|
|
|
1,689,940 |
|
|
|
1,756,036 |
|
|
|
1,094,646 |
|
|
|
720,304 |
|
|
|
549,354 |
|
|
|
410,177 |
|
Short-term borrowings and long-term debt
|
|
|
119,510 |
|
|
|
263,300 |
|
|
|
249,194 |
|
|
|
338,661 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
15,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
238,253 |
|
|
|
128,022 |
|
|
|
133,571 |
|
|
|
97,451 |
|
|
|
67,442 |
|
|
|
35,862 |
|
|
|
32,297 |
|
Selected Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
95,935 |
|
|
|
63,780 |
|
|
$ |
90,855 |
|
|
$ |
53,823 |
|
|
$ |
39,117 |
|
|
$ |
35,713 |
|
|
$ |
34,032 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
22,208 |
|
|
|
13,784 |
|
|
|
19,720 |
|
|
|
12,798 |
|
|
|
9,771 |
|
|
|
9,140 |
|
|
|
8,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
73,727 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
|
|
|
71,135 |
|
|
|
41,025 |
|
|
|
29,346 |
|
|
|
26,573 |
|
|
|
25,399 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
3,163 |
|
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
5,145 |
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
4,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
69,510 |
|
|
|
46,833 |
|
|
|
67,221 |
|
|
|
35,880 |
|
|
|
27,759 |
|
|
|
23,773 |
|
|
|
21,100 |
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
8,735 |
|
|
|
6,175 |
|
|
|
8,726 |
|
|
|
4,270 |
|
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
|
3,437 |
|
|
|
2,948 |
|
Noninterest operating expenses
|
|
|
47,814 |
|
|
|
32,056 |
|
|
|
44,929 |
|
|
|
27,290 |
|
|
|
19,050 |
|
|
|
18,256 |
|
|
|
16,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
30,431 |
|
|
|
20,952 |
|
|
|
31,018 |
|
|
|
12,860 |
|
|
|
12,644 |
|
|
|
8,954 |
|
|
|
7,725 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
10,808 |
|
|
|
7,324 |
|
|
|
10,961 |
|
|
|
4,171 |
|
|
|
4,235 |
|
|
|
3,001 |
|
|
|
2,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
19,623 |
|
|
$ |
13,628 |
|
|
$ |
20,057 |
|
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
|
$ |
8,409 |
|
|
$ |
5,953 |
|
|
$ |
5,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
10.45 |
|
|
|
7.02 |
|
|
|
7.32 |
|
|
|
5.84 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
3.42 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
Average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
19,841,670 |
|
|
|
16,838,882 |
|
|
|
17,189,687 |
|
|
|
14,313,611 |
|
|
|
10,677,736 |
|
|
|
10,730,738 |
|
|
|
10,765,985 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
21,856,613 |
|
|
|
18,034,097 |
|
|
|
18,405,120 |
|
|
|
14,613,173 |
|
|
|
10,715,448 |
|
|
|
11,038,275 |
|
|
|
11,023,491 |
|
Common shares outstanding
|
|
|
22,793,241 |
|
|
|
18,236,454 |
|
|
|
18,249,554 |
|
|
|
16,681,273 |
|
|
|
13,908,279 |
|
|
|
10,850,787 |
|
|
|
10,779,381 |
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
($ in thousands, except per share data) | |
Selected Performance Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets(1)
|
|
|
1.09 |
% |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
1.11 |
% |
|
|
1.21 |
% |
Return on average stockholders equity(1)
|
|
|
14.82 |
|
|
|
16.84 |
|
|
|
17.48 |
|
|
|
12.19 |
|
|
|
19.39 |
|
|
|
15.04 |
|
|
|
16.95 |
|
Net interest margin(1)
|
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
7.93 |
|
Net interest spread(1)
|
|
|
3.58 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
57.98 |
|
|
|
57.07 |
|
|
|
56.26 |
|
|
|
60.25 |
|
|
|
57.24 |
|
|
|
60.83 |
|
|
|
57.58 |
|
Selected Liquidity and Capital Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan to deposit ratio
|
|
|
68.90 |
% |
|
|
64.23 |
% |
|
|
67.68 |
% |
|
|
66.97 |
% |
|
|
64.47 |
% |
|
|
74.13 |
% |
|
|
79.08 |
% |
Average earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
161.50 |
|
|
|
150.41 |
|
|
|
151.29 |
|
|
|
147.37 |
|
|
|
155.98 |
|
|
|
163.14 |
|
|
|
156.73 |
|
Risk based capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage capital
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
Tier 1
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Asset Quality Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans outstanding
|
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
|
1.24 |
% |
Non-performing loans to gross loans
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to gross loans
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.34 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
|
|
720.24 |
|
|
|
4,247.08 |
|
|
|
958.63 |
|
|
|
4,137.45 |
|
|
|
181.71 |
|
|
|
711.82 |
|
|
|
106.96 |
|
Growth Ratios and Other Data:(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage change in net income
|
|
|
44.0 |
% |
|
|
115.6 |
% |
|
|
130.8 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
41.3 |
% |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
15.5 |
% |
Percentage change in diluted net income per share
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
72.7 |
|
|
|
84.7 |
|
|
|
(24.4 |
) |
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Percentage change in assets
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
|
|
|
81.0 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
Percentage change in gross loans, including deferred fees
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
|
|
75.4 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
|
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
Percentage change in deposits
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
Percentage change in equity
|
|
|
86.2 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
44.5 |
|
|
|
88.1 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
Number of branches
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Annualized for the nine-month periods ended September 30,
2005 and 2004. |
|
(2) |
Ratios of changes in income are computed based upon the growth
over the comparable prior period. Ratios of changes in balance
sheet data compare period-end data against the same data from
the comparable period-end for the prior year. |
26
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF WESTERN ALLIANCE
The following discussion and analysis of our financial
condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with Selected Consolidated Financial and Other
Data and our consolidated financial statements and related
notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion and
analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks,
uncertainties and assumptions. Certain risks, uncertainties and
other factors, including but not limited to those set forth
under Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking
Statements, Risk Factors and elsewhere in this
proxy statement/ prospectus, may cause actual results to differ
materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements.
Overview and History
We are a bank holding company headquartered in Las Vegas,
Nevada. We provide a full range of banking and related services
to locally owned businesses, professional firms, real estate
developers and investors, local nonprofit organizations, high
net worth individuals and consumers through our subsidiary banks
and financial services companies located in Nevada, Arizona and
California. In addition to traditional lending and deposit
gathering capabilities, we also offer a broad array of financial
products and services aimed at satisfying the needs of small to
mid-sized businesses and their proprietors, including cash
management, trust administration and estate planning, custody
and investments and equipment leasing.
We generate the majority of our revenue from interest on loans,
service charges on customer accounts and income from investment
securities. This revenue is offset by interest expense paid on
deposits and other borrowings and non-interest expense such as
administrative and occupancy expenses. Net interest income is
the difference between interest income on interest-earning
assets such as loans and securities and interest expense on
interest-bearing liabilities such as customer deposits and other
borrowings which are used to fund those assets. Net interest
income is our largest source of net income. Interest rate
fluctuations, as well as changes in the amount and type of
earning assets and liabilities, combine to affect net interest
income.
We provide a variety of loans to our customers, including
commercial and residential real estate loans, construction and
land development loans, commercial and industrial loans, and to
a lesser extent, consumer loans. We rely primarily on locally
generated deposits to provide us with funds for making loans. We
intend to continue expanding our lending activities and have
recently begun offering Small Business Administration, or SBA,
loans.
In addition to these traditional commercial banking
capabilities, we also provide our customers with cash
management, trust administration and estate planning, equipment
leasing, and custody and investment services, resulting in
revenue generated from non-interest income. We receive fees from
our deposit customers in the form of service fees, checking fees
and other fees. Other services such as safe deposit and wire
transfers provide additional fee income. We may also generate
income from time to time from the sale of investment securities.
The fees collected by us and any gains on sales of securities
are found in our Consolidated Statements of Income under
non-interest income. Offsetting these earnings are
operating expenses referred to as non-interest
expense. Because banking is a very people intensive
industry, our largest operating expense is employee compensation
and related expenses.
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Financial Measures | |
|
|
| |
|
|
At or for the Nine Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, | |
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share data) | |
Net Income
|
|
$ |
19,623 |
|
|
$ |
13,628 |
|
|
$ |
20,057 |
|
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
|
$ |
8,409 |
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
1.17 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
2,745,014 |
|
|
|
2,126,252 |
|
|
|
2,176,849 |
|
|
|
1,576,773 |
|
|
|
872,074 |
|
Gross Loans
|
|
|
1,617,541 |
|
|
|
1,085,439 |
|
|
|
1,188,535 |
|
|
|
733,078 |
|
|
|
464,355 |
|
Total Deposits
|
|
|
2,347,498 |
|
|
|
1,689,940 |
|
|
|
1,756,036 |
|
|
|
1,094,646 |
|
|
|
720,304 |
|
Net interest margin(1)
|
|
|
4.39 |
% |
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
3.83 |
% |
|
|
4.57 |
% |
Efficiency Ratio
|
|
|
57.98 |
|
|
|
57.07 |
|
|
|
56.26 |
|
|
|
60.25 |
|
|
|
57.24 |
|
Return on average assets(1)
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
Return on average equity(1)
|
|
|
14.82 |
|
|
|
16.84 |
|
|
|
17.48 |
|
|
|
12.19 |
|
|
|
19.39 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Annualized for the nine-month periods ended September 30,
2005 and 2004. |
Primary Factors in Evaluating Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
As a bank holding company, we focus on several factors in
evaluating our financial condition and results of operations,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Average Equity, or ROE; |
|
|
|
Return on Average Assets, or ROA; |
|
|
|
Asset Quality; |
|
|
|
Asset and Deposit Growth; and |
|
|
|
Operating Efficiency. |
Return on Average Equity. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2005, net income increased 44.0% to
$19.6 million compared to $13.6 million for the same
period on 2004. The increase in net income was due primarily to
an increase in net interest income of $23.7 million and an
increase in non-interest income of $2.6 million, offset by
an increase of $1.1 million to the provision for loan
losses, and an increase of $15.8 million in other expenses.
Basic earnings per share increased to $0.99 per share for
the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to
$0.81 per share for the same period in 2004. Diluted
earnings per share increased to $0.90 per share for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to
$0.76 per share for the same period last year. The increase
in net income offset by the increase in equity resulted in an
ROE of 14.82% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
compared to 16.84% for the nine months ended September 30,
2004.
Our net income for the year ended December 31, 2004
increased 130.8% to $20.1 million compared to
$8.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The
increase in net income was due primarily to an increase in net
interest income of $30.1 million and a decrease of
$1.2 million to the provision for loan losses, partially
offset by an increase of $17.6 million in other expenses.
Basic earnings per share increased to $1.17 per share for
the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to
$0.61 per share for the same period in 2003. Diluted
earnings per share increased to $1.09 per share for the
year ended December 31, 2004, compared to $0.59 per
share for the same period last year. The increase in net income
resulted in an ROE of 17.5% for the year ended December 31,
2004, compared to 12.2% for the year ended December 31,
2003.
Return on Average Assets. Our ROA for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 increased to 1.09% compared to
1.00% for the same period in 2004. The increases in ROA are
primarily due to the increases in net income as discussed above.
28
Asset Quality. For all banks and bank holding companies,
asset quality plays a significant role in the overall financial
condition of the institution and results of operations. We
measure asset quality in terms of nonperforming loans and assets
as a percentage of gross loans and assets, and net charge-offs
as a percentage of average loans. Nonperforming loans include
loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing,
non-accrual loans and restructured loans. Net charge-offs are
calculated as the difference between charged-off loans and
recovery payments received on previously charged-off loans. As
of September 30, 2005, non-accrual loans were $175,000
compared to $1.6 million at December 31, 2004 and
$275,000 at December 31, 2003. Nonperforming loans as a
percentage of gross loans were 0.01% as of September 30,
2005, compared to 0.13% as of December 31, 2004 and 0.04%
as of December 31, 2003. At September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004 and 2003, our nonperforming assets were
exclusively comprised of nonperforming loans. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2005, net charge-offs as a
percentage of average loans were 0.02%, compared to net
charge-offs of less than 0.01% and 0.17% for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Asset Growth. The ability to produce loans and generate
deposits is fundamental to our asset growth. Our assets and
liabilities are comprised primarily of loans and deposits,
respectively. Total assets increased 29.1% to $2.7 billion
as of September 30, 2005 from $2.2 billion as of
December 31, 2004 and $1.6 billion as of
December 31, 2003. Gross loans grew 49.0% to
$1.6 billion as of September 30, 2005 from
$1.2 billion as of December 31, 2004 and
$733.1 million as of December 31, 2003. Total deposits
increased 38.9% to $2.3 billion as of September 30,
2005 from $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2004 and
$1.1 billion as of December 31, 2003.
Operating Efficiency. Operating efficiency is measured in
terms of how efficiently income before income taxes is generated
as a percentage of revenue. Our efficiency ratio (non-interest
expenses divided by the sum of net interest income and non
interest income) was 58.0% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 from 57.1% for the same period in 2004.
Our efficiency ratios for the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003 were 56.3% and 60.3%, respectively.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contain a summary
of our significant accounting policies, including discussions on
recently issued accounting pronouncements, our adoption of them
and the related impact of their adoption. We believe that
certain of these policies, along with various estimates that we
are required to make in recording our financial transactions,
are important to have a complete picture of our financial
position. In addition, these estimates require us to make
complex and subjective judgments, many of which include matters
with a high degree of uncertainty. The following is a discussion
of these critical accounting policies and significant estimates.
Additional information about these policies can be found in
Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses
is a valuation allowance for probable losses incurred in the
loan portfolio. Our allowance for loan loss methodology
incorporates a variety of risk considerations in establishing an
allowance for loan loss that we believe is adequate to absorb
losses in the existing portfolio. Such analysis addresses our
historical loss experience, delinquency and charge-off trends,
collateral values, changes in nonperforming loans, economic
conditions, peer group experience and other considerations. This
information is then analyzed to determine estimated loss
factors which, in turn, is assigned to each loan category.
These factors also incorporate known information about
individual loans, including the borrowers sensitivity to
interest rate movements. Changes in the factors themselves are
driven by perceived risk in pools of homogenous loans classified
by collateral type, purpose and term. Management monitors local
trends to anticipate future delinquency potential on a quarterly
basis. In addition to ongoing internal loan reviews and risk
assessment, management utilizes an independent loan review firm
to provide advice on the appropriateness of the allowance for
loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for
loan losses charged to expense and reduced by loans charged off,
net of recoveries. Provisions for loan losses are provided on
both a specific and general basis. Specific allowances are
provided for watch, criticized, and impaired credits for which
the expected/anticipated loss may be measurable. General
valuation allowances are based on a portfolio segmentation based
on collateral type, purpose and risk grading, with a further
evaluation of various factors noted above.
29
We incorporate our internal loss history to establish potential
risk based on collateral type securing each loan. As an
additional comparison, we examine peer group banks to determine
the nature and scope of their losses. Finally, we closely
examine each credit graded Watch List/ Special
Mention and below to individually assess the appropriate
specific loan loss reserve for such credit.
At least annually, we review the assumptions and formulae by
which additions are made to the specific and general valuation
allowances for loan losses in an effort to refine such allowance
in light of the current status of the factors described above.
The total loan portfolio is thoroughly reviewed at least
quarterly for satisfactory levels of general and specific
reserves together with impaired loans to determine if write
downs are necessary.
Although we believe the levels of the allowance as of
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and 2003 were
adequate to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio, a
decline in local economic or other factors could result in
increasing losses that cannot be reasonably estimated at this
time.
Available-for-Sale Securities. Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, requires that
available-for-sale securities be carried at fair value.
Management utilizes the services of a third party vendor to
assist with the determination of estimated fair values.
Adjustments to the available-for-sale securities fair value
impact the consolidated financial statements by increasing or
decreasing assets and stockholders equity.
Stock-Based Compensation. We account for stock-based
employee compensation arrangements in accordance with provision
of Accounting Principles Board, or APB, Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and comply
with the disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 123 Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. Therefore, we do not record any
compensation expense for stock options we grant to our employees
where the exercise price equals the fair market value of the
stock on the date of grant and the exercise price, number of
shares eligible for issuance under the options and vesting
period are fixed. We comply with the disclosure requirements of
SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148, which require
that we disclose our pro forma net income or loss and net income
or loss per common share as if we had expensed the fair value of
the options.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
published FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment, or FAS 123(R). FAS 123(R)
requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based
payment transactions, including grants of employee stock
options, be recognized in financial statements. That cost will
be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability
instruments issued. FAS 123(R) permits entities to use any
option-pricing model that meets the fair value objective in the
Statement. Modifications of share-based payments will be treated
as replacement awards with the cost of the incremental value
recorded in the financial statements.
The Statement became effective at the beginning of the first
quarter of 2006. As of the effective date, we now apply the
Statement using a modified version of prospective application.
Under that transition method, compensation cost is recognized
for (1) all awards granted after the required effective
date and to awards modified, cancelled, or repurchased after
that date and (2) the portion of awards granted subsequent
to completion of an IPO and prior to the effective date for
which the requisite service has not yet been rendered, based on
the grant-date fair value of those awards calculated for pro
forma disclosures under SFAS 123.
The impact of this Statement on us in 2006 and beyond will
depend on various factors including our future compensation
strategy.
Trends and Developments Impacting Our Recent Results
Certain trends emerged and developments have occurred that are
important in understanding our recent results and that are
potentially significant in assessing future performance.
Growth in our market areas. Our growth has been fueled in
particular by the significant population and economic growth of
the greater Las Vegas area where we conduct the majority of our
operations. The growth in this area has coincided with
significant investments in the gaming and tourism industry. The
significant
30
population increase has resulted in an increase in the
acquisition of raw land for residential and commercial
development, the construction of residential communities,
shopping centers and office buildings, and the development and
expansion of the businesses and professions that provide
essential goods and services to this expanded population.
Similarly, growth in the Phoenix, Tucson and San Diego
markets has contributed to our growth.
Asset sensitivity. Management uses various modeling
strategies to manage the repricing characteristics of our assets
and liabilities. These models contain a number of assumptions
and can not take into account all the various factors that
influence the sensitivities of our assets and liabilities.
Despite these limitations, most of our models at
September 30, 2005 indicated that our balance sheet was
asset sensitive. A company is considered to be asset sensitive
if the amount of its interest earning assets maturing or
repricing within a certain time period exceed the amount of its
interest-bearing liabilities also maturing or repricing within
the same period. Being asset sensitive means generally that in
times of rising interest rates, a companys net interest
income will increase, and in times of falling interest rates,
net interest income will decrease.
Because many of our assets are floating rate loans, which are
funded by our relatively large non-interest bearing deposit
base, we are asset sensitive. During 2003 and 2004, we mitigated
this asset sensitivity and increased earnings by investing in
mortgage-backed securities funded by short-term FHLB borrowings.
This strategy had the effect of leveraging our excess capital to
produce incremental returns without incurring additional credit
risk. In light of the rising interest rate environment,
beginning in the third quarter of 2004, we discontinued this
strategy.
We expect that if market interest rates continue to rise, our
net interest margin and our net interest income will be
favorably impacted. See Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosure about Market Risk.
Impact of expansion on non-interest expense. We
anticipate that the expansion will result in a significant
increase in occupancy and equipment expense. The cost to
construct and furnish a new branch is approximately
$2.5 million, excluding the cost to lease or purchase the
land on which the branch is located. Consistent with our
historical growth strategy, as we open new offices and expand
both within and outside our current markets, we plan to recruit
seasoned relationship bankers, thereby increasing our salary
expenses. Initially, this increase in salary expense is expected
to be higher than the revenues to be received from the customer
relationships brought to us by the new relationship bankers.
Prior to 2005, Robert Sarvers management company received
an annual fee of $60,000 pursuant to a consulting agreement. The
consulting agreement was terminated in 2005 and Mr. Sarver
received an annual base salary of $500,000 in 2005. In addition,
Mr. Sarver received a discretionary bonus determined by our
Compensation Committee, which amount was 100% of his 2005 base
salary.
Impact of service center on non-interest income. We have
a service center facility currently under development in the Las
Vegas metropolitan area, which we anticipate will become
operational in the third quarter of 2006. The anticipated cost
to construct and furnish our service center will be between
$13.0 and $15.0 million. We expect that this facility, once
completed, will increase our capacity to provide courier, cash
management and other business services. We anticipate this will
have a favorable impact on our non-interest income.
Results of Operations
Our results of operations depend substantially on net interest
income, which is the difference between interest income on
interest-earning assets, consisting primarily of loans
receivable, securities and other short-term investments, and
interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, consisting
primarily of deposits and borrowings. Our results of operations
are also dependent upon our generation of non-interest income,
consisting of income from trust and investment advisory services
and banking service fees. Other factors contributing to our
results of operations include our provisions for loan losses,
gains or losses on sales of securities and income taxes, as well
as the level of our non-interest expenses, such as compensation
and benefits, occupancy and equipment and other miscellaneous
operating expenses.
31
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 Compared to Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2004 |
The following table sets forth a summary financial overview for
the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Increase | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share | |
|
|
data) | |
Consolidated Statement of Earnings Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$ |
95,935 |
|
|
$ |
63,780 |
|
|
$ |
32,155 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
22,208 |
|
|
|
13,784 |
|
|
|
8,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
73,727 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
|
|
|
23,731 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
3,163 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
69,510 |
|
|
|
46,833 |
|
|
|
22,677 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
8,735 |
|
|
|
6,175 |
|
|
|
2,560 |
|
Other expense
|
|
|
47,814 |
|
|
|
32,056 |
|
|
|
15,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before income taxes
|
|
|
30,431 |
|
|
|
20,952 |
|
|
|
9,479 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
10,808 |
|
|
|
7,324 |
|
|
|
3,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
19,623 |
|
|
$ |
13,628 |
|
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
increased 44.0% over the same period in the 2004, which is due
to an increase in net interest income of $23.7 million and
an increase in non-interest income of $2.6 million, offset
by an increase of $1.1 million to the provision for loan
losses and $15.8 million in other expenses. The increase in
net interest income for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2005 over the same period in
September 30, 2004 was the result of an increase in the
volume of and yield earned on interest-earning assets, primarily
loans.
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin. Net interest
income for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
increased 47.5% over the same period in 2004. This was due to an
increase in interest income of $32.2 million, reflecting
the effect of an increase of $543.8 million in average
interest-bearing assets which was funded with an increase of
$624.8 million in average deposits, of which
$252.1 million were non-interest bearing.
The average yield on our interest-earning assets was 5.71% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to 5.01%
for the same period in 2004. The increase in the yield on our
interest-earning assets is a result of an increase in market
rates, repricing on our adjustable rate loans, and new loans
originated with higher interest rates because of the higher
interest rate environment. Also, loans, which typically yield
more than our other interest-bearing assets, increased as a
percent of total interest-bearing assets from 52.0% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2004, to 62.5% for the same
period in 2005.
The cost of our average interest-bearing liabilities increased
to 2.14% in the nine months ended September 30, 2005, from
1.63% in the nine months ended September 30, 2004, which is
a result of higher rates paid on deposit accounts, borrowings
and junior subordinated debt. The increase in the cost of our
interest-bearing liabilities was partially offset by lower
average balances on our borrowings, which typically carry higher
rates than our deposits.
32
Average Balances and Average Interest Rates. The table
below sets forth balance sheet items on a daily average basis
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 and
presents the daily average interest rates earned on assets and
the daily average interest rates paid on liabilities for such
periods. Non-accrual loans have been included in the average
loan balances. Securities include securities available for sale
and securities held to maturity. Securities available for sale
are carried at amortized cost for purposes of calculating the
average rate received on taxable securities above. Yields on
tax-exempt securities and loans are not computed on a tax
equivalent basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Balance | |
|
Interest | |
|
Yield/Cost(6) | |
|
Balance | |
|
Interest | |
|
Yield/Cost(6) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Earning Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
$ |
739,072 |
|
|
$ |
22,053 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
% |
|
$ |
765,629 |
|
|
$ |
22,097 |
|
|
|
3.86 |
% |
|
Tax-exempt(1)
|
|
|
7,064 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
4.85 |
|
|
|
7,241 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
746,136 |
|
|
|
22,309 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
772,870 |
|
|
|
22,353 |
|
|
|
3.86 |
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
82,124 |
|
|
|
1,919 |
|
|
|
3.12 |
|
|
|
29,190 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
|
Loans(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
1,403,124 |
|
|
|
71,266 |
|
|
|
6.79 |
|
|
|
884,730 |
|
|
|
40,819 |
|
|
|
6.16 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
13,242 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
4.45 |
|
|
|
14,046 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
3.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings assets
|
|
|
2,244,626 |
|
|
|
95,935 |
|
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
|
1,700,836 |
|
|
|
63,780 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
Non-earning Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
|
76,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(17,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
31,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
66,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,401,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,824,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking
|
|
$ |
107,359 |
|
|
$ |
407 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
% |
|
$ |
67,778 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
% |
|
Savings and money market
|
|
|
791,664 |
|
|
|
11,279 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
|
|
|
527,711 |
|
|
|
5,143 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
276,385 |
|
|
|
5,438 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
|
|
207,254 |
|
|
|
3,125 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
1,175,408 |
|
|
|
17,124 |
|
|
|
1.95 |
|
|
|
802,743 |
|
|
|
8,344 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
72,219 |
|
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
2.42 |
|
|
|
186,620 |
|
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
111,314 |
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
|
110,487 |
|
|
|
2,376 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
6.57 |
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
4.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
1,389,869 |
|
|
|
22,208 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
|
|
|
1,130,778 |
|
|
|
13,784 |
|
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
823,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
10,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
176,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
2,401,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,824,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income and margin(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73,727 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
49,996 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.38 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Yields on loans and securities have not been adjusted to a tax
equivalent basis. |
|
(2) |
Net loan fees of $915,000 and $635,000 are included in the yield
computation for September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. |
|
(3) |
Includes average non-accrual loans of $454,000 in 2005 and
$347,000 in 2004. |
|
(4) |
Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest income
by total average earning assets. |
|
(5) |
Net interest spread represents average yield earned on
interest-earning assets less the average rate paid on
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(6) |
Annualized. |
33
Net Interest Income. The table below demonstrates the
relative impact on net interest income of changes in the volume
of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and changes
in rates earned and paid by us on such assets and liabilities.
For purposes of this table, non-accrual loans have been included
in the average loan balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 v. 2004 | |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) | |
|
|
Due to Changes in(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Volume | |
|
Rate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Interest on securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
$ |
(792 |
) |
|
$ |
748 |
|
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
1,695 |
|
Loans
|
|
|
26,330 |
|
|
|
4,117 |
|
|
|
30,447 |
|
Other investment
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
26,742 |
|
|
|
5,413 |
|
|
|
32,155 |
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
Savings and Money market
|
|
|
3,761 |
|
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
|
6,136 |
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(2,067 |
) |
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
(656 |
) |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
3,221 |
|
|
|
5,203 |
|
|
|
8,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase
|
|
$ |
23,521 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
23,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Changes due to both volume and rate have been allocated to
volume changes. |
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses
in each period is reflected as a charge against earnings in that
period. The provision is equal to the amount required to
maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level that, in our
judgment, is adequate to absorb probable loan losses inherent in
the loan portfolio.
Our provision for loan losses was $4.2 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005, compared to
$3.2 million for the same period in 2004. The provision
increased primarily due to the growth of the loan portfolio.
Loan growth for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
was $429.0 million, compared to $352.4 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of
$76.6 million.
Non-Interest Income. We earn non-interest income
primarily through fees related to:
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and investment advisory services, |
|
|
|
Services provided to deposit customers, and |
|
|
|
Services provided to current and potential loan customers. |
34
The following tables present, for the periods indicated, the
major categories of non-interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Trust and investment advisory services
|
|
$ |
4,108 |
|
|
$ |
1,801 |
|
|
$ |
2,307 |
|
Service charges
|
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Income from bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
Investment securities gains, net
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,655 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
$ |
8,735 |
|
|
$ |
6,175 |
|
|
$ |
2,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $2.6 million, or 41.5%, increase in non-interest income
from the nine months ended September 30, 2004 to the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 was due to an increase in
Miller/ Russell investment advisory revenues.
Non-Interest Expense. The following table presents, for
the periods indicated, the major categories of non-interest
expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$ |
27,049 |
|
|
$ |
17,934 |
|
|
$ |
9,115 |
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
7,314 |
|
|
|
5,271 |
|
|
|
2,043 |
|
Customer service
|
|
|
2,930 |
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
Advertising, public relations and business development
|
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
789 |
|
Legal, professional and director fees
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
Correspondent banking service charges and wire transfer costs
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
Audits and exams
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
Data processing
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
Supplies
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
Travel and automobile
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
Insurance
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Telephone
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
|
$ |
47,814 |
|
|
$ |
32,056 |
|
|
$ |
15,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense grew $15.8 million from the nine
months ended September 30, 2004 to the same period in 2005.
This increase is attributable to our overall growth, and
specifically to the opening of new branches and hiring of new
relationship officers and other employees. At September 30,
2005, we had 522 full-time equivalent employees compared to
399 at September 30, 2004. Miller/ Russell was acquired in
May 2004, three banking branches were opened during calendar
year 2004, and two banking branches were opened during the nine
months ended September 30, 2005. The increase in salaries
and occupancy expenses related to the above for the nine month
period ended September 30, 2005 totaled $11.2 million,
which is 71% of the total increase in non-interest expenses.
Customer service expense increased $1.5 million from the
nine month period ended September 30, 2004 to the same
period in 2005, due to an increase in the analysis earnings
credit rate used to calculate earnings credits accrued for the
benefit of certain title company deposit accounts. Other
non-interest expense increased, in general, as a result of the
growth in assets and operations of Alliance Bank of Arizona and
Torrey Pines Bank and overall growth of BankWest of Nevada.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective federal income
tax rate was 35.5%, for the nine months ended September 30,
2005, compared to 35.0%, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004.
35
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2003 |
The following table sets forth a summary financial overview for
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share | |
|
|
data) | |
Consolidated Statement of Earnings Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$ |
90,855 |
|
|
$ |
53,823 |
|
|
$ |
37,032 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
19,720 |
|
|
|
12,798 |
|
|
|
6,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
71,135 |
|
|
|
41,025 |
|
|
|
30,110 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
5,145 |
|
|
|
(1,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
67,221 |
|
|
|
35,880 |
|
|
|
31,341 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
8,726 |
|
|
|
4,270 |
|
|
|
4,456 |
|
Other expense
|
|
|
44,929 |
|
|
|
27,290 |
|
|
|
17,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before income taxes
|
|
|
31,018 |
|
|
|
12,860 |
|
|
|
18,158 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
10,961 |
|
|
|
4,171 |
|
|
|
6,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
20,057 |
|
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
|
$ |
11,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 130.8% increase in net income in the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2003 was attributable primarily to an increase
in net interest income of $30.1 million and a
$1.2 million decrease to the provision for loan losses,
partially offset by a $17.6 million increase to other
expenses. The increase in net interest income was the result of
an increase in the volume of interest-earning assets, primarily
loans, and a decrease in our cost of funds, due principally to
an increase in non-interest bearing deposits.
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin. The 73.4%
increase in net interest income for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2003 was due to an increase in interest income
of $37.0 million, reflecting the effect of an increase of
$706.4 million in average interest-bearing assets which was
funded with an increase of $558.7 million in average
deposits, of which $255.5 million were non-interest bearing.
The average yield on our interest-earning assets was 5.11% for
the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to 5.03% for the
year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of 1.6%. The
slight increase in the yield on our interest-earning assets is a
result of an increase in the yield earned on our securities
portfolio and a shift of federal funds sold into higher-yielding
securities, offset by a decline in the yield on our loan
portfolio as fixed rate loans repriced at lower interest rate
levels. The increase in the yield on our securities portfolio
from 3.70% in 2003 to 3.89% in 2004 was due to two factors:
(1) most of the growth of our securities portfolio was in
mortgage-backed securities, which typically yield more than our
other securities classes; and (2) premium amortization on
our mortgage-backed securities portfolio decreased from 2003 to
2004 due to less prepayment activity on the underlying mortgages.
The cost of our average interest-bearing liabilities decreased
to 1.68% in the year ended December 31, 2004, from 1.76% in
the year ended December 31, 2003, which is a result of
lower rates paid on deposit accounts, offset by higher average
balances and rates paid on borrowings.
Our average rate on our interest-bearing deposits decreased 4.0%
from 1.49% for the year ended December 31, 2003, to 1.43%
for the year ended December 31, 2004, reflecting reductions
in general market rates. Our average rate on total deposits
(including non-interest bearing deposits) decreased 8.7% from
0.92% for the year ended December 31, 2003, to 0.84% for
the year ended December 31, 2004.
Our interest margin of 4.00% for the year ended
December 31, 2004 was higher than our margin for the
previous year of 3.83% due to an increase in our yield on
interest-bearing assets and a decrease in our overall cost of
funds.
36
Average Balances and Average Interest Rates. The table
below sets forth balance sheet items on a daily average basis
for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and presents
the daily average interest rates earned on assets and the daily
average interest rates paid on liabilities for such periods.
Non-accrual loans have been included in the average loan
balances. Securities include securities available for sale and
securities held to maturity. Securities available for sale are
carried at amortized cost for purposes of calculating the
average rate received on taxable securities below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Balance | |
|
Interest | |
|
Yield/Cost | |
|
Balance | |
|
Interest | |
|
Yield/Cost | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Earning Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
$ |
781,407 |
|
|
$ |
30,373 |
|
|
|
3.89 |
% |
|
$ |
432,425 |
|
|
$ |
15,938 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
% |
|
Tax-exempt(1)
|
|
|
7,198 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
|
7,266 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
4.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
788,605 |
|
|
|
30,714 |
|
|
|
3.89 |
|
|
|
439,691 |
|
|
|
16,284 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
25,589 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
52,735 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
Loans(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
947,848 |
|
|
|
59,311 |
|
|
|
6.26 |
|
|
|
571,501 |
|
|
|
36,792 |
|
|
|
6.44 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
14,320 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
|
6,063 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
2.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings assets
|
|
|
1,776,362 |
|
|
|
90,855 |
|
|
|
5.11 |
|
|
|
1,069,990 |
|
|
|
53,823 |
|
|
|
5.03 |
|
Non-earning Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
|
67,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(13,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
25,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
47,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,902,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,148,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking
|
|
$ |
73,029 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
$ |
51,723 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
Savings and money market
|
|
|
561,744 |
|
|
|
7,585 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
336,012 |
|
|
|
4,358 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
214,515 |
|
|
|
4,396 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
|
|
|
158,418 |
|
|
|
3,707 |
|
|
|
2.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
849,288 |
|
|
|
12,123 |
|
|
|
1.43 |
|
|
|
546,153 |
|
|
|
8,158 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
239,175 |
|
|
|
4,472 |
|
|
|
1.87 |
|
|
|
111,258 |
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
54,733 |
|
|
|
1,586 |
|
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
|
37,701 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
1,174,124 |
|
|
|
19,720 |
|
|
|
1.68 |
|
|
|
726,040 |
|
|
|
12,798 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
600,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
13,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
114,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
1,902,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,148,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income and margin(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
71,135 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,025 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Yields on loans and securities have not been adjusted to a tax
equivalent basis. |
|
(2) |
Net loan fees of $872,000 and $810,000 are included in the yield
computation for 2004 and 2003, respectively. |
|
(3) |
Includes average non-accrual loans of $426,000 in 2004 and
$393,000 in 2003. |
|
(4) |
Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest income
by total average earning assets. |
|
(5) |
Net interest spread represents average yield earned on
interest-earning assets less the average rate paid on
interest-bearing liabilities. |
37
Net Interest Income. The table below sets forth the
relative impact on net interest income of changes in the volume
of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and changes
in rates earned and paid by us on such assets and liabilities.
For purposes of this table, non-accrual loans have been included
in the average loan balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 v. 2003 | |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) | |
|
|
Due to Changes in(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Volume | |
|
Rate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Interest on securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
$ |
13,565 |
|
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
14,435 |
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(285 |
) |
Loans
|
|
|
23,550 |
|
|
|
(1,031 |
) |
|
|
22,519 |
|
Other investment
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
37,111 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
37,032 |
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Savings and Money market
|
|
|
3,048 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
689 |
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
2,801 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
(383 |
) |
|
|
111 |
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
7,125 |
|
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
6,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease)
|
|
$ |
29,986 |
|
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
30,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Changes due to both volume and rate have been allocated to
volume changes. |
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses
in each period is reflected as a charge against earnings in that
period. The provision is equal to the amount required to
maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level that, in our
judgment, is adequate to absorb probable loan losses inherent in
the loan portfolio.
Our provision for loan losses declined to $3.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004, from $5.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2003. The provision
declined because (1) net charge-offs decreased from
$953,000 in 2003 to $21,000 in 2004; (2) our asset quality
has remained high, with nonperforming loans as a percentage of
total loans at 0.13% at December 31, 2004 and 0.04% at
December 31, 2003; and (3) we have maintained a
relatively low level of charge-offs over the last five years,
which yielded lower loss experience factors in our required
reserve calculations. These factors are adjusted periodically to
reflect this historical experience and were most recently
adjusted in December 2004.
Non-Interest Income. We earn non-interest income
primarily through fees related to:
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and investment advisory services, |
|
|
|
Services provided to deposit customers, and |
|
|
|
Services provided to current and potential loan customers. |
38
The following tables present, for the periods indicated, the
major categories of non-interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Trust and investment advisory services
|
|
$ |
2,896 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,896 |
|
Service charges
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
Income from bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
Mortgage loan pre-underwriting fees
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
(357 |
) |
Investment securities gains (losses), net
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
284 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
$ |
8,726 |
|
|
$ |
4,270 |
|
|
$ |
4,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $4.5 million, or 104.4%, increase in non-interest
income was influenced by several factors. Premier Trust, Inc.
was purchased on December 30, 2003, and Miller/
Russell & Associates, Inc. was purchased on
May 17, 2004. Collectively, these subsidiaries produced
$2.9 million in trust and investment advisory fees in the
year ended December 31, 2004. We had no such income in 2003.
Service charges increased $335,000 from 2003 to 2004 due to
higher deposit balances and the growth in our customer base.
Income from bank owned life insurance, or BOLI, increased
$236,000. We purchased the BOLI products in 2003 to help offset
employee benefit costs. The first year for which we earned
twelve months income from BOLI was 2004.
Mortgage loan pre-underwriting fees decreased $357,000 due to a
lower volume of refinance activity in 2004 as compared to 2003,
and a shift in strategy whereby we began originating certain
mortgages for our own portfolio rather than acting as a broker
for mortgages.
Other income increased $1.1 million, due in part, to the
sale and servicing of SBA loans by Alliance Bank of Arizona,
which resulted in other income of $341,000, and the increase in
ATM fees, income from wire transfer activity and debit card
income.
39
Non-Interest Expense. The following table presents, for
the periods indicated, the major categories of non-interest
expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$ |
25,590 |
|
|
$ |
15,615 |
|
|
$ |
9,975 |
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
7,309 |
|
|
|
4,820 |
|
|
|
2,489 |
|
Customer service
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
Advertising, public relations and business development
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
Legal, professional and director fees
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
Correspondent banking service charges and wire transfer costs
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
Audits and exams
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
Supplies
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
Data Processing
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Telephone
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Insurance
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
Travel and automobile
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
Organizational costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
(604 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
1,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
|
$ |
44,929 |
|
|
$ |
27,290 |
|
|
$ |
17,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense grew $17.6 million, or 64.6%. This
growth is attributable to our overall growth, and specifically
to the opening of new branches and the hiring of new
relationship officers and other employees, particularly at
Alliance Bank of Arizona and Torrey Pines Bank, both of which
opened during the year ended December 31, 2003. At
December 31, 2004, we had 454 full-time equivalent
employees compared to 317 at December 31, 2003. Miller/
Russell was acquired in 2004, Premier Trust was acquired on
December 30, 2003, and three banking branches were opened
during 2004. Two bank branches were opened at the end of 2003,
causing a minimal impact on 2003 expenses. The increase in
salaries and occupancy expenses related to the above totaled
$12.5 million, which is 71% of the total increase in
non-interest expenses.
Also affecting non-interest expenses was the increase in our
customer service costs. This line item grew $1.2 million,
or 166%, due primarily to an increase in analysis earnings
credits paid to certain title company depositors of $606,000,
due to higher balances maintained by the title companies and
higher earnings credit rates at the end of 2004. We provide an
analysis earnings credit for certain title company depositors,
which is calculated by applying a variable crediting rate to
such customers average monthly deposit balances, less any
deposit service charges incurred. We then purchase external
services on their behalf based on the amount of the earnings
credit. These external services, which are commonly offered in
the banking industry, include courier, bookkeeping and data
processing services. The costs associated with these earnings
credits will increase or decrease based on movements in
crediting rates and fluctuations in the average monthly deposit
balances. The remaining increase is attributable to growth in
our customer base and branch locations.
Our correspondent banking service charges and wire transfer
costs increased $748,000, or 146.1%. At the end of 2003, we
converted to a new wire transfer system which allowed for a much
more efficient wire transfer process. This effectively allowed
us to handle a much higher volume of wire transfers at current
staffing levels, although we incurred additional software and
data processing costs in 2004 that are reflected in this line
item.
We incurred $604,000 of organizational costs in 2003 related to
the opening of Alliance Bank of Arizona and Torrey Pines Bank
the same year. No new banks were opened in 2004, and thus no
organizational costs were incurred.
40
Other non-interest expense increased $1.3 million from
December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2004. Other
non-interest expense increased, in general, as a result of the
growth in assets and operations of the two de novo banks
and overall growth of BankWest of Nevada. The first full year of
operations for the two de novo banks was 2004.
Provision for Income Taxes. We recorded tax provisions of
$11.0 million and $4.2 million for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our effective tax
rates were 35.3% and 32.4% for 2004 and 2003, respectively. The
increase of the effective tax rates from 2003 to 2004 was
primarily due to state income taxes, as 2004 was the first full
year of operations in Arizona and California.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2002 |
The following table sets forth a summary financial overview for
the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands, except | |
|
|
per share data) | |
Consolidated Statement of Earnings Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$ |
53,823 |
|
|
$ |
39,117 |
|
|
$ |
14,706 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
12,798 |
|
|
|
9,771 |
|
|
|
3,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
41,025 |
|
|
|
29,346 |
|
|
|
11,679 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
5,145 |
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
3,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
35,880 |
|
|
|
27,759 |
|
|
|
8,121 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
4,270 |
|
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
Other expense
|
|
|
27,290 |
|
|
|
19,050 |
|
|
|
8,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before income taxes
|
|
|
12,860 |
|
|
|
12,644 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
4,171 |
|
|
|
4,235 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
|
$ |
8,409 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our net income grew by 3.3% to $8.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003, as compared to $8.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase is
attributable to an increase of net interest income of
$11.7 million, offset by an increased provision for loan
losses of $3.6 million and an increase in non-interest
expenses of $8.2 million. The increase in net interest
income was a result of an increase in the volume of
interest-earning assets, both investments and loans, and a
decrease in our cost of funds due principally to lower rates
paid on deposit accounts.
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin. The 39.8%
increase in net interest income for the year was due to an
increase in interest income of $14.7 million, reflecting
the effect of an increase of $427.3 million in average
interest-earning assets, funded by an increase of
$307.1 million in average deposits and an increase of
$122.9 million in average borrowings.
The average yield on our interest-earning assets was 5.03% for
the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to 6.09% for the
year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of 17.4%. The
decrease in our yield on interest-earning assets is a result of
a general decline in interest rates. Thus, interest-bearing
assets acquired in 2003 yielded lower rates than the respective
portfolios earned in 2002. Further, certain variable rate
instruments that were on the books in 2002 re-priced in 2003 at
lower rates.
41
The cost of our average interest-bearing liabilities decreased
to 1.76% in the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to
2.37% in 2002, which is a result of lower rates paid on deposits
and borrowings.
The average rate on our interest-bearing deposits decreased
28.7% from 2.09% for the year ended December 31, 2002, to
1.49% for the year ended December 31, 2003, reflecting
reductions in general market rates. However, the reduction in
general market rates was offset by higher interest-bearing
deposit rates at Alliance Bank of Arizona.
Our interest margin of 3.83% for the year ended
December 31, 2003 was lower than our margin of 4.57% for
the previous year due to a decrease in our yield on
interest-bearing assets. We also experienced a decrease in our
cost of funding, but, due partially to the higher rates paid at
Alliance Bank of Arizona, it was not enough to offset the
decrease in asset yield.
Average Balances and Average Interest Rates. The table
below sets forth balance sheet items on a daily average basis
for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, and
presents the daily average interest rates earned on assets and
the daily average interest rates paid on liabilities for such
periods. Non-accrual loans have been included in the average
loan balances. Securities include securities available for sale
and securities held to maturity. Securities available for sale
are carried at amortized cost for purposes of calculating the
average rate received on taxable securities above. Yields on
tax-exempt securities and loans are not computed on a tax
equivalent basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Balance | |
|
Interest | |
|
Yield/Cost | |
|
Balance | |
|
Interest | |
|
Yield/Cost | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Earning Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
$ |
432,425 |
|
|
$ |
15,938 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
% |
|
$ |
143,202 |
|
|
$ |
6,616 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
% |
|
Tax-exempt(1)
|
|
|
7,266 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
4.76 |
|
|
|
7,419 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
439,691 |
|
|
|
16,284 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
|
|
|
150,621 |
|
|
|
6,970 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
52,735 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
51,358 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
Loans(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
571,501 |
|
|
|
36,792 |
|
|
|
6.44 |
|
|
|
439,391 |
|
|
|
31,290 |
|
|
|
7.12 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
6,063 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
2.79 |
|
|
|
1,364 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings assets
|
|
|
1,069,990 |
|
|
|
53,823 |
|
|
|
5.03 |
|
|
|
642,734 |
|
|
|
39,117 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
|
Non-earning Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
|
41,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(8,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
17,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
28,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,148,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
687,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Balance | |
|
Interest | |
|
Yield/Cost | |
|
Balance | |
|
Interest | |
|
Yield/Cost | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Interest Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking
|
|
$ |
51,723 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
$ |
43,139 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
Savings and money market
|
|
|
336,012 |
|
|
|
4,358 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
198,613 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
1.92 |
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
158,418 |
|
|
|
3,707 |
|
|
|
2.34 |
|
|
|
112,782 |
|
|
|
3,469 |
|
|
|
3.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
546,153 |
|
|
|
8,158 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
354,534 |
|
|
|
7,394 |
|
|
|
2.09 |
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
111,258 |
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
14,332 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
37,701 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
|
|
|
27,098 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
|
|
|
16,108 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
726,040 |
|
|
|
12,798 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
|
|
412,072 |
|
|
|
9,771 |
|
|
|
2.37 |
|
Non-interest Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
345,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
6,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
71,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
1,148,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
687,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income and margin(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,025 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,346 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Yields on loans and securities have not been adjusted to a tax
equivalent basis. |
|
(2) |
Net loan fees of $810,000 and $674,000 are included in the yield
computation for 2003 and 2002, respectively. |
|
(3) |
Includes average non-accrual loans of $393,000 in 2003 and
$1.3 million in 2002. |
|
(4) |
Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest income
by total average earning assets. |
|
(5) |
Net interest spread represents average yield earned on interest
earning assets less the average rate paid on interest bearing
liabilities. |
43
Net Interest Income. The table below demonstrates the
relative impact on net interest income of changes in the volume
of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and changes
in rates earned and paid by us on such assets and liabilities.
For purposes of this table, non-accrual loans have been included
in the average loan balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 v. 2002 | |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) | |
|
|
Due to Changes in(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Volume | |
|
Rate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Interest on securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
$ |
10,660 |
|
|
$ |
(1,338 |
) |
|
$ |
9,322 |
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
Loans
|
|
|
8,505 |
|
|
|
(3,003 |
) |
|
|
5,502 |
|
Other investment
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
19,304 |
|
|
|
(4,598 |
) |
|
|
14,706 |
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
Savings and Money market
|
|
|
1,782 |
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
535 |
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
(830 |
) |
|
|
238 |
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
1,532 |
|
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
5,330 |
|
|
|
(2,303 |
) |
|
|
3,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease)
|
|
$ |
13,974 |
|
|
$ |
(2,295 |
) |
|
$ |
11,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Changes due to both volume and rate have been allocated to
volume changes. |
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses
in each period is reflected as a charge against earnings in that
period. The provision is equal to the amount required to
maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level that, in our
judgment, is adequate to absorb probable loan losses inherent in
the loan portfolio.
Our provision for loan losses increased $3.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to
December 31, 2002. The provision increased primarily
because of a growth in loans of $268.7 million in 2004, as
compared to the previous years loan growth of
$57.1 million. Our provision also increased due to the
significant growth seen at our two de novo banks in 2003.
44
Non-Interest Income. The following table presents, for
the periods indicated, the major categories of non-interest
income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Service charges
|
|
$ |
1,998 |
|
|
$ |
1,644 |
|
|
$ |
354 |
|
Income from bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
967 |
|
Mortgage loan pre-underwriting fees
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Investment securities gains (losses), net
|
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
(874 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
$ |
4,270 |
|
|
$ |
3,935 |
|
|
$ |
335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $354,000, or 21.5%, increase in service charges was due to
higher deposit balances and the growth in our customer base.
BOLI was purchased in March 2003, and thus there was no income
from bank owned life insurance in the year ended
December 31, 2002. We purchased BOLI to help offset
employee benefit costs.
Mortgage loan pre-underwriting fees increased $73,000, or 10.2%,
due to an increase in mortgage activity in the year ended
December 31, 2003 over the year ended December 31,
2002, caused by lower interest rates and a strong real estate
market.
Non-Interest Expense. The following table presents, for
the periods indicated, the major categories of non-interest
expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$ |
15,615 |
|
|
$ |
9,921 |
|
|
$ |
5,694 |
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
4,820 |
|
|
|
3,794 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
Legal, professional and director fees
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
Advertising, public relations and business development
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
Customer service
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
Supplies
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
Organizational costs
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
Correspondent banking service charges and wire transfer costs
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
Data processing
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
Audit and exams
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Telephone
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
Insurance
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Travel and automobile
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Other
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
|
$ |
27,290 |
|
|
$ |
19,050 |
|
|
$ |
8,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $8.2 million, or 43.3%, increase in total non-interest
expense was principally the result of the opening of two de
novo banks in the year ended December 31, 2003, and to
a lesser extent the overall growth of BankWest of Nevada. The
salaries and employee benefits expense increased
$5.7 million, or 57.4%, which is directly attributable to
the opening of two new banks and the hiring of additional staff
at BankWest of Nevada
45
to service the growing customer base. We had 317 full-time
equivalent employees at December 31, 2003, as compared to
207 at December 31, 2002.
The $1.0 million, or 27.0%, growth in occupancy expense is
also a result of the opening of the de novo banks.
Alliance Bank of Arizona and Torrey Pines Bank opened a total of
five branch locations in Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona and
San Diego, California, respectively, during the year ended
December 31, 2003.
The increases in salaries and employee benefits and occupancy
expenses noted above totaled $6.7 million, or 81.6% of the
total increase in non-interest expenses.
Most other individual line items comprising total non-interest
expenses were also affected by the opening of Alliance Bank of
Arizona and Torrey Pines Bank, including advertising, supplies,
correspondent banking service charges, data processing, audits
and exams, telephone, insurance and travel and automobile.
Accordingly, each of these line items increased in 2003 as
compared to 2002.
Customer service is one of the few non-interest expense items to
experience a decrease from the year ended December 31, 2002
to the year ended December 31, 2003. Customer service
expense decreased $79,000, or 9.5%. This is primarily due to a
decrease in the analysis earnings credit paid to certain title
company depositors of $230,000, due to lower balances maintained
by the title companies and a lower earnings credit rate during
the year ended December 31, 2003. This decrease was offset
by an increase to other components of this expense line-item,
due to growth in our customer base and the new banking
institutions.
We incurred $604,000 and $461,000 in organizational costs in the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively,
related to the organization and opening of Alliance Bank of
Arizona and Torrey Pines Bank.
Provision for Income Taxes. We recorded tax provisions of
$4.2 million in 2003 and 2002. Our effective tax rates for
2003 and 2002 were comparable at 32.4% and 33.5%, respectively.
Financial Condition
On a consolidated basis, our total assets as of
September 30, 2005, December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003 were $2.7 billion, $2.2 billion
and $1.6 billion, respectively. The overall increase from
December 31, 2004 to September 30, 2005 was primarily
due to a $429.0 million, or 36.1%, increase in gross loans
and a $179.2 million, or 155.3% increase in cash and cash
equivalents. Likewise, the growth in assets from
December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2004 was primarily
due to a $455.5 million, or 62.1%, increase in gross loans
and a $49.5 million, or 75.1% increase in cash and cash
equivalents.
Our gross loans, including deferred loan fees, on a consolidated
basis as of September 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and
December 31, 2003 were $1.6 billion, $1.2 billion
and $733.1 million, respectively. Since December 31,
2000, construction and land development loans experienced the
highest growth within the portfolio, growing from
$37.3 million to $397.0 million as of
September 30, 2005. Residential real estate experienced the
second highest amount of growth, growing from $20.0 million
as of December 31, 2000 to $239.5 million as of
September 30, 2005. Our overall growth in loans from
December 31, 2000 to September 30, 2005 is consistent
with our focus and strategy to grow our loan portfolio by
focusing on markets which we believe have attractive growth
prospects. See Business Business
Strategy.
46
The following table shows the amounts of loans outstanding by
type of loan at the end of each of the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Construction and land development
|
|
$ |
396,970 |
|
|
$ |
323,176 |
|
|
$ |
195,182 |
|
|
$ |
127,974 |
|
|
$ |
82,604 |
|
|
$ |
37,283 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
655,004 |
|
|
|
491,949 |
|
|
|
324,702 |
|
|
|
209,834 |
|
|
|
208,683 |
|
|
|
168,314 |
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
239,538 |
|
|
|
116,360 |
|
|
|
42,773 |
|
|
|
21,893 |
|
|
|
18,067 |
|
|
|
20,043 |
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
307,045 |
|
|
|
241,292 |
|
|
|
159,889 |
|
|
|
94,411 |
|
|
|
85,050 |
|
|
|
84,200 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
21,046 |
|
|
|
17,682 |
|
|
|
11,802 |
|
|
|
10,281 |
|
|
|
13,156 |
|
|
|
14,561 |
|
Net deferred loan fees
|
|
|
(2,062 |
) |
|
|
(1,924 |
) |
|
|
(1,270 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans, net of deferred fees
|
|
|
1,617,541 |
|
|
|
1,188,535 |
|
|
|
733,078 |
|
|
|
464,355 |
|
|
|
407,210 |
|
|
|
324,350 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(19,288 |
) |
|
|
(15,271 |
) |
|
|
(11,378 |
) |
|
|
(6,449 |
) |
|
|
(6,563 |
) |
|
|
(4,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,598,253 |
|
|
$ |
1,173,264 |
|
|
$ |
721,700 |
|
|
$ |
457,906 |
|
|
$ |
400,647 |
|
|
$ |
319,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the amount of loans outstanding
by type of loan as of December 31, 2004 which were
contractually due in one year or less, more than one year and
less than five years, and more than five years based on
remaining scheduled repayments of principal. Lines of credit or
other loans having no stated final maturity and no stated
schedule of repayments are reported as due in one year or less.
The table also presents an analysis of the rate structure for
loans within the same maturity time periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Due Within | |
|
Due 1-5 | |
|
Due Over | |
|
|
|
|
One Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Five Years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Construction and land development
|
|
$ |
249,878 |
|
|
$ |
63,175 |
|
|
$ |
10,123 |
|
|
$ |
323,176 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
54,357 |
|
|
|
153,067 |
|
|
|
284,525 |
|
|
|
491,949 |
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
16,101 |
|
|
|
15,834 |
|
|
|
84,425 |
|
|
|
116,360 |
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
138,993 |
|
|
|
90,290 |
|
|
|
12,009 |
|
|
|
241,292 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
13,256 |
|
|
|
4,283 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
17,682 |
|
Net deferred loan fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans, net of deferred fees
|
|
|
472,585 |
|
|
|
326,649 |
|
|
|
391,225 |
|
|
|
1,188,535 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
472,585 |
|
|
$ |
326,649 |
|
|
$ |
391,225 |
|
|
$ |
1,173,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
$ |
44,341 |
|
|
$ |
163,644 |
|
|
$ |
291,742 |
|
|
$ |
499,727 |
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
428,244 |
|
|
|
163,005 |
|
|
|
99,483 |
|
|
|
690,732 |
|
Net deferred loan fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans, net of deferred fees
|
|
$ |
472,585 |
|
|
$ |
326,649 |
|
|
$ |
391,225 |
|
|
$ |
1,188,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentrations. Our loan portfolio has a concentration of
loans in real-estate related loans and includes significant
credit exposure to the commercial real estate industry. As of
September 30, 2005, December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, real estate-related loans comprised
79.7%, 78.3% and 76.6% of total gross loans, respectively.
Substantially all of these loans are secured by first liens with
an initial loan to value ratio of generally no more than 80%.
Approximately one-half of these real estate loans are owner
occupied.
47
One-to-four family
residential real estate loans have a lower risk than commercial
real estate and construction and land development loans due to
lower loan balances to single borrowers. Our policy for
requiring collateral is to obtain collateral whenever it is
available or desirable, depending upon the degree of risk we are
willing to accept. Repayment of loans is expected from the sale
proceeds of the collateral or from the borrowers cash
flows. Deterioration in the performance of the economy or real
estate values in our primary market areas, in particular, could
have an adverse impact on collectibility, and consequently have
an adverse effect on our profitability. See Risk
Factors.
Non-Performing Assets. Non-performing loans include loans
past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest,
non-accrual loans, restructured loans, and other real estate
owned, or OREO. In general, loans are placed on non-accrual
status when we determine timely recognition of interest to be in
doubt due to the borrowers financial condition and
collection efforts. Restructured loans have modified terms to
reduce either principal or interest due to deterioration in the
borrowers financial condition. OREO results from loans
where we have received physical possession of the
borrowers assets. The following table summarizes the loans
for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued, loans
past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest,
restructured loans, and OREO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the | |
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
| |
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
1,591 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
1,039 |
|
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
$ |
3,251 |
|
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing
|
|
|
2,503 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
1,186 |
|
Restructured loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
|
2,678 |
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
3,549 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
4,437 |
|
Other real estate owned (OREO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
|
2,678 |
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
3,549 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
4,437 |
|
Non-performing loans to gross loans
|
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
1.37 |
% |
Non-performing assets to gross loans and OREO
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
Interest income received on nonaccrual loans
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
Interest income that would have been recorded under the original
terms of the loans
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
non-accrual loans totaled $175,000 and $1.6 million,
respectively. The decrease is due to a pay-off of a non-accrual
credit with a balance of $1.2 million. Non-accrual loans at
September 30, 2005 consisted of six loans, none larger than
$77,000. Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing
consist almost entirely of credits with one borrower.
OREO Properties. As of September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, we did not have any OREO properties.
Impaired Loans. A loan is impaired when it is probable we
will be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest
payments due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement.
Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans
effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the
loans observable market price or the fair value of the
collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The categories
of non-accrual loans and impaired loans overlap, although they
are not coextensive. A loan can be placed on non-accrual status
due to payment delinquency or uncertain collectibility but is
not considered impaired, if it is probable that we will collect
all amounts due in accordance with the original contractual
terms of the loan. We consider all circumstances regarding the
loan and borrower
48
on an individual basis when determining whether a loan is
impaired such as the collateral value, reasons for the delay,
payment record, the amount past due, and number of days past due.
As of September 30, 2005, December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, the aggregate total amount of loans
classified as impaired was $175,000, $1.7 million and
$333,000, respectively. The total specific allowance for loan
losses related to these loans was $60,000, $498,000 and $130,000
for September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses |
Like all financial institutions, we must maintain an adequate
allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses is
established through a provision for loan losses charged to
expense. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses
when we believe that collectibility of the principal is
unlikely. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the
allowance. The allowance is an amount that we believe will be
adequate to absorb probable losses on existing loans that may
become uncollectible, based on evaluation of the collectibility
of loans and prior credit loss experience, together with the
other factors noted earlier.
Our allowance for loan loss methodology incorporates several
quantitative and qualitative risk factors used to establish the
appropriate allowance for loan loss at each reporting date.
Quantitative factors include our historical loss experience,
peer group experience, delinquency and charge-off trends,
collateral values, changes in non-performing loans, other
factors, and information about individual loans including the
borrowers sensitivity to interest rate movements.
Qualitative factors include the economic condition of our
operating markets and the state of certain industries. Specific
changes in the risk factors are based on perceived risk of
similar groups of loans classified by collateral type, purpose
and terms. Statistics on local trends, peers, and an internal
five-year loss history are also incorporated into the allowance.
Due to the credit concentration of our loan portfolio in real
estate secured loans, the value of collateral is heavily
dependent on real estate values in Southern Nevada, Arizona and
Southern California. While management uses the best information
available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the
allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in
economic or other conditions. In addition, the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, and state banking regulatory
agencies, as an integral part of their examination processes,
periodically review the Banks allowance for loan losses,
and may require us to make additions to the allowance based on
their judgment about information available to them at the time
of their examinations. Management periodically reviews the
assumptions and formulae used in determining the allowance and
makes adjustments if required to reflect the current risk
profile of the portfolio.
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The
specific allowance relates to watch credits, criticized loans,
and impaired loans. For such loans that are also classified as
impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash
flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the
impaired loan are lower than the carrying value of that loan,
pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB,
Statement No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan. The general allowance covers
non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience
adjusted for the various qualitative and quantitative factors
listed above, pursuant to FASB Statement No. 5, or
FASB 5, Accounting for Contingencies. Loans graded
Watch List/ Special Mention and below are
individually examined closely to determine the appropriate loan
loss reserve.
49
The table below presents information regarding our provision and
allowance for loan losses for the periods and years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
15,271 |
|
|
$ |
11,378 |
|
|
$ |
11,378 |
|
|
$ |
6,449 |
|
|
$ |
6,563 |
|
|
$ |
4,746 |
|
|
$ |
4,166 |
|
Provisions charged to operating expenses
|
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
3,163 |
|
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
5,145 |
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
4,299 |
|
Adjustments(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Loans charged-off:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charged-off
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
1,936 |
|
|
|
3,806 |
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
3,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
19,288 |
|
|
$ |
14,525 |
|
|
$ |
15,271 |
|
|
$ |
11,378 |
|
|
$ |
6,449 |
|
|
$ |
6,563 |
|
|
$ |
4,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding
|
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
|
1.24 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to gross loans
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.34 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
|
|
(1) |
In accordance with regulatory reporting requirements and
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Statement of Position 01-06, Accounting by Certain Entities that
Lend to or Finance the Activities of Others, the Company has
reclassified the portion of its allowance for loan losses that
relates to undisbursed commitments during the year ended
December 31, 2002. During the year ended December 31,
2003, management reevaluated its methodology for calculating
this amount and reclassified an amount from other liabilities to
the allowance for loan losses. The liability amount was
approximately $507,000, $307,000 and $68,000 as of
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. |
50
The following table details the allocation of the allowance for
loan losses to the various categories. The allocation is made
for analytical purposes and it is not necessarily indicative of
the categories in which future credit losses may occur. The
total allowance is available to absorb losses from any segment
of loans. The allocations in the table below were determined by
a combination of the following factors: specific allocations
made on loans considered impaired as determined by management
and the loan review committee, a general allocation on certain
other impaired loans, and historical losses in each loan type
category combined with a weighting of the current loan
composition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
|
Loans in | |
|
|
|
Loans in | |
|
|
|
Loans in | |
|
|
|
Loans in | |
|
|
|
Loans in | |
|
|
|
Loans in | |
|
|
|
|
Each | |
|
|
|
Each | |
|
|
|
Each | |
|
|
|
Each | |
|
|
|
Each | |
|
|
|
Each | |
|
|
|
|
Category | |
|
|
|
Category | |
|
|
|
Category | |
|
|
|
Category | |
|
|
|
Category | |
|
|
|
Category | |
|
|
|
|
to Gross | |
|
|
|
to Gross | |
|
|
|
to Gross | |
|
|
|
to Gross | |
|
|
|
to Gross | |
|
|
|
to Gross | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Loans | |
|
Amount | |
|
Loans | |
|
Amount | |
|
Loans | |
|
Amount | |
|
Loans | |
|
Amount | |
|
Loans | |
|
Amount | |
|
Loans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Construction and land development
|
|
$ |
5,905 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
$ |
4,920 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
$ |
3,252 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
% |
|
$ |
1,050 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
$ |
1,462 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
% |
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
2,095 |
|
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
51.2 |
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
51.9 |
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
9,942 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
7,502 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
6,192 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
3,110 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
19,288 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
15,271 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
11,378 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,449 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,563 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,746 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In general, the Commercial and Industrial Loans
category represents the highest risk category for commercial
banks. Historically, our largest source of losses has been in
this category. As a result, we utilize a larger estimated loss
factor for this category than we do for real estate secured
loans. Our commercial loan portfolio as of September 30,
2005 was $307.0 million, or 19.0% of total loans. Other
categories, such as stock and bond secured or assignment of cash
collateral loans are provided a nominal loss factor based upon a
history of comparatively lower losses. While the majority of our
historical charge-offs have occurred in the commercial
portfolio, we believe that the allowance allocation is adequate
when considering the current composition of commercial loans and
related loss factors.
Our Construction and Land Development category
reflects some borrower concentration risk and carries the
enhanced risk encountered with construction loans in general.
Currently, construction activity within our primary markets is
very competitive, presenting challenges in the timely completion
of projects. A construction project can be delayed for an
extended period as unanticipated problems arise. Unscheduled
work can be difficult to accomplish due to the high demand for
construction workers and delays associated with permitting
issues. As a result, a higher loan loss allocation is devoted to
this loan category than to other loan categories except
commercial and industrial loans as noted earlier, and consumer
loans.
Our Commercial Real Estate loan category contains a
mixture of new and seasoned properties, retail, office,
warehouse, and some special purpose. Loans on properties are
generally underwritten at a loan to value ratio of less than 80%
with a minimum debt coverage ratio of 1.20. Historically, our
losses on this product have been minimal and the portfolio
continues to exhibit exceptionally high credit quality.
Moreover, a large percentage of the Commercial Real Estate loan
portfolio is comprised of owner-occupied relationships, which
usually reflect a relatively low risk profile. Consequently, the
estimated loan loss factor applied to this sub-category is
comparatively low.
Securities are identified as either
held-to-maturity or
available-for-sale based upon various factors, including
asset/liability management strategies, liquidity and
profitability objectives, and regulatory requirements.
Held-to-maturity
securities are carried at cost, adjusted for amortization of
premiums or accretion of
51
discounts. Available-for-sale securities are securities that may
be sold prior to maturity based upon asset/liability management
decisions. Securities identified as available-for-sale are
carried at fair value. Unrealized gains or losses on
available-for-sale securities are recorded as accumulated other
comprehensive income in stockholders equity. Amortization
of premiums or accretion of discounts on mortgage-backed
securities is periodically adjusted for estimated prepayments.
We use our investment securities portfolio to ensure liquidity
for cash requirements, manage interest rate risk, provide a
source of income and to manage asset quality. The carrying value
of our investment securities as of September 30, 2005
totaled $713.1 million, compared to $788.6 million at
December 31, 2004, $716.0 million as of
December 31, 2003, and $232.8 million as of
December 31, 2002. The decrease experienced from
December 31, 2004 to September 30, 2005 was a result
of called U.S. Government-sponsored agency obligations and
principal received from mortgage-backed obligations. The
increase experienced from 2002 to 2003 was a result of growth in
deposits and growth in other borrowings. In 2002, we executed
short and long term advances with FHLB, which were used to
purchase investment securities, and sold securities under
agreement to repurchase. These FHLB advances and other
borrowings will mature by December 31, 2007. The increase
experienced from 2003 to 2004 was a result of growth in
deposits, as well as a strategy whereby we increased earnings by
investing in mortgage-backed securities funded by short-term
FHLB borrowings. This strategy had the effect of leveraging our
excess capital to produce incremental returns without incurring
additional credit risk. In light of the rising interest rate
environment, beginning in the third quarter of 2004, we
discontinued this strategy, contributing to the decline in our
investment balances and increase in our federal funds sold from
December 31, 2004 to September 30, 2005.
Our portfolio of investment securities during 2004, 2003, and
2002 consisted primarily of mortgage-backed obligations and
U.S. Government agency obligations. From December 31,
2002 to September 30, 2005, the majority of our growth in
investment securities was in mortgage-backed obligations, which
typically yield more than other investment securities classes.
The carrying value of our portfolio of investment securities at
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$ |
3,496 |
|
|
$ |
3,501 |
|
|
$ |
3,014 |
|
|
$ |
3,040 |
|
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies
|
|
|
137,464 |
|
|
|
118,348 |
|
|
|
112,537 |
|
|
|
59,651 |
|
Mortgage-backed obligations
|
|
|
552,456 |
|
|
|
648,100 |
|
|
|
581,446 |
|
|
|
156,982 |
|
SBA Loan Pools
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
1,779 |
|
State and Municipal obligations
|
|
|
7,153 |
|
|
|
7,290 |
|
|
|
7,563 |
|
|
|
8,109 |
|
Other
|
|
|
11,999 |
|
|
|
10,758 |
|
|
|
10,276 |
|
|
|
3,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
$ |
713,075 |
|
|
$ |
788,622 |
|
|
$ |
715,978 |
|
|
$ |
232,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
The contractual maturity distribution and weighted average yield
of our available for sale and held to maturity portfolios at
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are
summarized in the table below. Weighted average yield is
calculated by dividing income within each maturity range by the
outstanding amount of the related investment and has not been
tax affected on tax-exempt obligations. Securities available for
sale are carried at amortized cost in the table below for
purposes of calculating the weighted average yield received on
such securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Due Under | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year | |
|
Due 1-5 Years | |
|
Due 5-10 Years | |
|
Due Over 10 Years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Yield | |
|
Amount | |
|
Yield | |
|
Amount | |
|
Yield | |
|
Amount | |
|
Yield | |
|
Amount | |
|
Yield | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Available for Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored Agency obligations
|
|
$ |
61,537 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
$ |
39,800 |
|
|
|
3.31 |
% |
|
$ |
28,937 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
% |
|
$ |
8,059 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
% |
|
$ |
138,333 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
% |
Mortgage-backed obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,703 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449,973 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
|
456,676 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
State and Municipal obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12,144 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,144 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for sale
|
|
$ |
73,681 |
|
|
|
3.53 |
% |
|
$ |
46,503 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
$ |
28,937 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
% |
|
$ |
458,032 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
% |
|
$ |
607,153 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$ |
2,996 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
3,496 |
|
|
|
2.69 |
% |
State and Municipal obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,687 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
|
|
|
5,466 |
|
|
|
4.94 |
|
|
|
7,153 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
Mortgage-backed obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,960 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
105,960 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
SBA Loan Pools
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held to maturity
|
|
$ |
2,996 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
% |
|
$ |
1,913 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
% |
|
$ |
111,707 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
% |
|
$ |
117,116 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Due Under | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year | |
|
Due 1-5 Years | |
|
Due 5-10 Years | |
|
Due Over 10 Years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Yield | |
|
Amount | |
|
Yield | |
|
Amount | |
|
Yield | |
|
Amount | |
|
Yield | |
|
Amount | |
|
Yield | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Available for Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government- sponsored Agency obligations
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
66,800 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
% |
|
$ |
24,289 |
|
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
$ |
27,709 |
|
|
|
3.59 |
% |
|
$ |
118,798 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
Mortgage-backed obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,981 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
|
529,401 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
|
537,382 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
Other
|
|
|
10,781 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,781 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for sale
|
|
$ |
10,781 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
% |
|
$ |
66,800 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
% |
|
$ |
32,270 |
|
|
|
3.49 |
% |
|
$ |
557,110 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
% |
|
$ |
666,961 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
% |
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
3,501 |
|
|
|
2.16 |
% |
State and Municipal obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
|
|
|
6,510 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
|
|
|
7,290 |
|
|
|
4.85 |
|
Mortgage-backed obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,133 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
|
|
118,133 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
SBA Loan Pools
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held to maturity
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
% |
|
$ |
2,601 |
|
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
$ |
680 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
% |
|
$ |
125,268 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
% |
|
$ |
129,549 |
|
|
|
4.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
We had a concentration of U.S. Government sponsored
agencies and mortgage-backed securities during the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and each of the years 2004, 2003
and 2002. The aggregate carrying value and aggregate fair value
of these securities at September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Aggregate carrying value
|
|
$ |
689,920 |
|
|
$ |
766,448 |
|
|
$ |
693,983 |
|
|
$ |
216,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate fair value
|
|
$ |
688,191 |
|
|
$ |
765,453 |
|
|
$ |
693,044 |
|
|
$ |
216,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2005, we
purchased $24.0 million of bank owned life insurance.
Deposits have historically been the primary source for funding
our asset growth. As of September 30, 2005, total deposits
were $2.3 billion, compared to $1.8 billion as of
December 31, 2004. The increase in total deposits is
attributable to our ability to attract a stable base of low-cost
deposits. As of September 30, 2005, non-interest bearing
deposits were $1.0 billion, compared to $749.6 million
as of December 31, 2004. Approximately $426.2 million
of total deposits, or 18.2%, as of September 30, 2005
consisted of non-interest bearing demand accounts maintained by
title insurance companies. Interest-bearing accounts have also
experienced growth. As of September 30, 2005,
interest-bearing deposits were $1.3 billion, compared to
$1.0 billion as of December 31, 2004. Interest-bearing
deposits are comprised of NOW accounts, savings and money market
accounts, certificates of deposit under $100,000, and
certificates of deposit over $100,000.
The average balances and weighted average rates paid on deposits
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and years
ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
Interest checking (NOW)
|
|
$ |
107,359 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
% |
|
$ |
73,029 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
$ |
51,723 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
$ |
43,139 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
% |
Savings and money market
|
|
|
791,664 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
|
|
|
561,744 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
336,012 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
198,613 |
|
|
|
1.92 |
|
Time
|
|
|
276,385 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
|
|
214,515 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
|
|
|
158,418 |
|
|
|
2.34 |
|
|
|
112,782 |
|
|
|
3.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
1,175,408 |
|
|
|
1.95 |
|
|
|
849,288 |
|
|
|
1.43 |
|
|
|
546,153 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
354,534 |
|
|
|
2.09 |
|
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
823,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$ |
1,999,275 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
$ |
1,450,078 |
|
|
|
0.84 |
% |
|
$ |
891,427 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
% |
|
$ |
584,377 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining maturity for certificates of deposit of $100,000
or more as of September 30, 2005 is presented in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
3 months or less
|
|
$ |
146,334 |
|
3 to 6 months
|
|
|
63,493 |
|
6 to 12 months
|
|
|
54,963 |
|
Over 12 months
|
|
|
10,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
275,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
Current risk-based regulatory capital standards generally
require banks and bank holding companies to maintain three
minimum capital ratios. Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
compares Tier 1 or core capital,
which consists principally of common equity, and risk-weighted
assets for a minimum ratio of at least 4%. Tier 1 capital
ratio compares Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets for
a minimum ratio of at least 4%. Total risk-based capital ratio
compares total capital, which consists of Tier 1 capital,
certain forms of subordinated debt, a portion of the allowance
for loan losses, and preferred stock, to risk-weighted assets
for a minimum ratio of at least 8%. Risk-weighted assets are
calculated by multiplying the balance in each category of assets
by a risk factor, which ranges from zero for cash assets and
certain government obligations to 100% for some types of loans,
and adding the products together.
The following table provides a comparison of our risk-based
capital ratios and leverage ratios to the minimum regulatory
requirements for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Adequately | |
|
|
|
|
Actual | |
|
Capitalized(1) | |
|
Well-Capitalized | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Ratio | |
|
Amount | |
|
Ratio | |
|
Amount | |
|
Ratio | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Leverage ratio (to Average Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest of Nevada
|
|
$ |
128,451 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
$ |
71,796 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
89,745 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona(1)
|
|
|
43,910 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
18,571 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
23,214 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
Torrey Pines Bank(1)
|
|
|
33,171 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
13,684 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
17,105 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
Company
|
|
|
270,020 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
104,659 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
130,824 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest of Nevada
|
|
$ |
128,451 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
$ |
48,934 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
73,401 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona
|
|
|
43,910 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
17,373 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
26,059 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
Torrey Pines Bank
|
|
|
33,171 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
12,291 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
18,436 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
Company
|
|
|
270,020 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
79,342 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
119,013 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest of Nevada
|
|
$ |
140,207 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
$ |
97,868 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
122,335 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona
|
|
|
48,894 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
13,745 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
43,431 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
Torrey Pines Bank
|
|
|
36,228 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
24,581 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
30,727 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
Company
|
|
|
289,817 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
158,684 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
198,355 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequately |
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
Capitalized(1) |
|
Well-Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
Leverage ratio (to Average Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest of Nevada
|
|
$ |
95,449 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
$ |
62,970 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
78,713 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona
|
|
|
31,810 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
12,394 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
15,492 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
Torrey Pines Bank
|
|
|
26,774 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
9,830 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
12,288 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
Company
|
|
|
163,205 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
85,321 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
106,651 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest of Nevada
|
|
$ |
95,449 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
$ |
40,484 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
60,726 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona(1)
|
|
|
31,810 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
11,214 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
16,821 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
Torrey Pines Bank(1)
|
|
|
26,774 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
8,006 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
12,010 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
Company
|
|
|
163,205 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
59,816 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
89,724 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest of Nevada
|
|
$ |
105,544 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
$ |
80,968 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
101,210 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona
|
|
|
35,258 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
22,428 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
28,035 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
Torrey Pines Bank
|
|
|
28,809 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
16,013 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
20,016 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
Company
|
|
|
178,784 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
119,632 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
149,540 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Alliance Bank of Arizona and Torrey Pines Bank have agreed to
maintain a Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 8% for the
first three years of their existence. |
We were well capitalized at all the banks and the holding
company as of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
In order to manage our capital position more efficiently, we
formed BankWest Nevada Capital Trust I and BankWest Nevada
Capital Trust II, both Delaware statutory trusts, for the
sole purpose of issuing trust preferred securities.
BankWest Nevada Capital Trust I. During the third
quarter of 2001, BankWest Nevada Capital Trust I was formed
with $464,000 in capital and issued 15,000 Floating Rate
Cumulative Trust Preferred Securities, or trust preferred
securities, with a liquidation value of $1,000 per
security, for gross proceeds of $15.0 million. The entire
proceeds of the issuance were invested by BankWest Nevada
Capital Trust I in $15.5 million of Floating Rate
Junior Subordinated Debentures issued by us, with identical
maturity, repricing, and payment terms as the trust preferred
securities. The subordinated debentures represent the sole
assets of BankWest Nevada Capital Trust I and mature on
July 25, 2031. The interest rate as of December 31,
2004 was 6.53% based on
6-month LIBOR plus
3.75% with repricing occurring and interest payments due
semiannually. Proceeds of $10 million was invested in
BankWest of Nevada. The remaining proceeds were retained by
Western Alliance for general corporate purposes.
56
The subordinated debentures are redeemable by us, subject to our
receipt of prior approval from the Federal Reserve of
San Francisco, on any January 25th or
July 25th on or after July 25, 2006, at the
redemption price. The redemption price is at a premium for a
redemption occurring prior to July 25, 2011 as set forth in
the following table plus accrued and unpaid interest.
|
|
|
|
|
Year Beginning |
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
July 25, 2006
|
|
|
107.6875 |
% |
July 25, 2007
|
|
|
106.1500 |
% |
July 25, 2008
|
|
|
104.6125 |
% |
July 25, 2009
|
|
|
103.0750 |
% |
July 25, 2010
|
|
|
101.5375 |
% |
July 25, 2011 and after
|
|
|
100.0000 |
% |
In the event of redemption under a special event occurring prior
to July 25, 2006, the price of redemption is the greater of
100% of the principal amount and the sum of the present values
of the principal amount and the premium payable as part of the
redemption price together with the present value of interest
payments calculated at a fixed per annum rate of interest equal
to 10.25% over the remaining life of the security discounted to
the special redemption date on a semi-annual basis at the
Treasury rate plus 0.50% plus accrued and unpaid interest.
Holders of the trust preferred securities are entitled to a
cumulative cash distribution on the liquidation amount of
$1,000 per security at an interest rate of 6.53% as of
December 31, 2004. The rate will be adjusted to equal the
6-month LIBOR plus
3.75% for each successive period beginning January 25 of each
year provided, however, that prior to July 25, 2011, such
annual rate shall not exceed 12.5%. BankWest Nevada Capital
Trust I has the option to defer payment of the
distributions for a period of up to five years, but during any
such deferral, we would be restricted from paying dividends on
our common stock.
BankWest Nevada Capital Trust II. During the fourth
quarter of 2002, BankWest Nevada Capital Trust II was
formed with $464,000 in capital and issued 15,000 Floating Rate
Cumulative Trust Preferred Securities, or trust preferred
securities, with a liquidation value of $1,000 per
security, for gross proceeds of $15.0 million. The entire
proceeds of the issuance were invested by BankWest Nevada
Capital Trust II in $15.5 million of Floating Rate
Junior Subordinated Debentures issued by us, with identical
maturity, repricing, and payment terms as the trust preferred
securities. The subordinated debentures represent the sole
assets of BankWest Nevada Capital Trust II and mature
January 7, 2033. The interest rate as of December 31,
2004 was 5.84% based on
3-month LIBOR plus
3.35% with repricing occurring and interest payments due
quarterly. All of the net proceeds were retained by Western
Alliance.
The subordinated debentures are redeemable by us, subject to our
receipt of prior approval from the Federal Reserve of
San Francisco, on any January 7th, April 7th,
July 7th, or October 7th on or after
January 7, 2008, at the redemption price. The redemption
price is par plus accrued and unpaid interest, except in the
case of redemption under a special event which is defined in the
debenture occurring prior to January 7, 2008 which is the
greater of 100% of the principal amount and the sum of the
present values of the principal amount together with the present
value of interest payments calculated at a fixed per annum rate
of interest equal to 7.125% over the remaining life of the
security discounted to the special redemption date on a
quarterly basis at the Treasury rate plus 0.50% plus accrued and
unpaid interest. Holders of the trust preferred securities are
entitled to a cumulative cash distribution on the liquidation
amount of $1,000 per security at an interest rate of 5.84%
as of December 31, 2004. The rate will be adjusted to equal
the 3-month LIBOR plus
3.35% for each successive period beginning January 7 of each
year provided, however, that prior to January 7, 2008, such
annual rate shall not exceed 12.5%. BankWest Nevada Capital
Trust II has the option to defer payment of the
distributions for a period of up to five years, but during any
such deferral, we would be restricted from paying dividends on
our common stock.
A special event under which the trust preferred securities could
be redeemed includes a Tax Event, Capital Treatment Event, or an
Investment Company Event. A Tax Event includes any amendment or
change in the laws or regulations of a taxing authority, an
official administrative pronouncement, or a judicial decision
interpreting or applying such laws or regulations that would
subject the trust to federal income tax, interest
57
payable would not be deductible in whole or part for federal
income tax purposes, or subject the trust to more than a de
minimis amount of other taxes, duties, assessments or other
government charges. A Capital Treatment Event includes any
amendment or change in the laws or an official administrative
pronouncement to treat the amount equal to the aggregate
liquidation amount of the capital securities as Tier 1
Capital for purposes of the capital adequacy guidelines of the
Federal Reserve. An Investment Company Event includes changes,
interpretation or application of laws or regulations that would
require the trust to be registered under the Investment Company
Act.
We have guaranteed, on a subordinated basis, distributions and
other payments due on the trust preferred securities. We own
100% of the common securities in the trusts. For financial
reporting purposes, our investment in the trusts is accounted
for under the equity method and is included in other assets on
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The subordinated
debentures issued and guaranteed by us and held by the trust are
reflected on our consolidated balance sheet in accordance with
provisions of Interpretation No. 46 issued by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. Under
applicable regulatory guidelines, all of the trust preferred
securities currently qualify as Tier 1 capital, although
this classification is subject to future change.
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We routinely enter into contracts for services in the conduct of
ordinary business operations which may require payment for
services to be provided in the future and may contain penalty
clauses for early termination of the contracts. To meet the
financing needs of our customers, we are also parties to
financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk including
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. We
have also committed to irrevocably and unconditionally guarantee
the following payments or distributions with respect to the
holders of preferred securities to the extent that BankWest
Nevada Trust I and BankWest Nevada Trust II have not
made such payments or distributions: (1) accrued and unpaid
distributions, (2) the redemption price, and (3) upon
a dissolution or termination of the trust, the lesser of the
liquidation amount and all accrued and unpaid distributions and
the amount of assets of the trust remaining available for
distribution. We do not believe that these off-balance sheet
arrangements have or are reasonably likely to have a material
effect on our financial condition, changes in financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations,
liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources. However,
there can be no assurance that such arrangements will not have a
future effect.
Long-Term Borrowed Funds. We also have entered into
long-term contractual obligations consisting of advances from
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). These advances are secured
with collateral generally consisting of securities. As of
September 30, 2005, these long-term FHLB advances totaled
$63.7 million and will mature by December 31, 2007.
Interest payments are due semi-annually. The weighted average
rate of the long-term FHLB advances as of September 30,
2005 was 2.63%.
The following table sets forth our significant contractual
obligations as of December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less Than | |
|
1-3 | |
|
3-5 | |
|
After | |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Long term borrowed funds
|
|
$ |
63,700 |
|
|
$ |
34,400 |
|
|
$ |
63,700 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
18,492 |
|
|
|
3,545 |
|
|
|
7,080 |
|
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
|
5,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
113,120 |
|
|
$ |
37,945 |
|
|
$ |
70,780 |
|
|
$ |
2,527 |
|
|
$ |
36,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
Our commitments associated with outstanding letters of credit,
commitments to extend credit, and credit card guarantees as of
December 31, 2004 are summarized below. Since commitments
associated with letters of credit and commitments to extend
credit may expire unused, the amounts shown do not necessarily
reflect the actual future cash funding requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Amounts |
|
Less Than |
|
1-3 |
|
3-5 |
|
After |
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
Committed |
|
1 Year |
|
Years |
|
Years |
|
5 Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
$ |
674,341 |
|
|
$ |
423,767 |
|
|
$ |
292,013 |
|
|
$ |
78,792 |
|
|
$ |
8,100 |
|
|
$ |
44,862 |
|
Credit card guarantees
|
|
|
7,404 |
|
|
|
5,421 |
|
|
|
5,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
29,506 |
|
|
|
5,978 |
|
|
|
3,984 |
|
|
|
1,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
711,251 |
|
|
$ |
435,166 |
|
|
$ |
301,418 |
|
|
$ |
80,786 |
|
|
$ |
8,100 |
|
|
$ |
44,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Borrowed Funds. Short-term borrowed funds are
used to support liquidity needs created by seasonal deposit
flows, to temporarily satisfy funding needs from increased loan
demand, and for other short-term purposes. The majority of these
short-term borrowed funds consist of advances from FHLB. The
borrowing capacity at FHLB is determined based on collateral
pledged, generally consisting of securities, at the time of
borrowing. We also have borrowings from other sources pledged by
securities including securities sold under agreements to
repurchase, which are reflected at the amount of cash received
in connection with the transaction, and may require additional
collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities.
As of September 30, 2005, total short-term borrowed funds
were $55.8 million with a weighted average interest rate of
2.60%, compared to total short-term borrowed funds of
$185.5 million as of December 31, 2004 with a weighted
average interest rate at year end of 2.23%. The decrease of
$129.7 million was, in general, a result of short-term
advances that had matured and were replaced by other sources of
funding, primarily deposits.
Since growth in core deposits may be at intervals different from
loan demand, we may follow a pattern of funding irregular growth
in assets with short-term borrowings, which are then replaced
with core deposits. This temporary funding source is likely to
be utilized for generally short-term periods, although no
assurance can be given that this will, in fact, occur.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding
FHLB advances and repurchase agreements at the dates or for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Years Ended |
|
|
At or for the |
|
December 31, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
FHLB Advances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum month-end balance
|
|
$ |
96,000 |
|
|
$ |
174,200 |
|
|
$ |
163,211 |
|
|
$ |
11,300 |
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,900 |
|
|
|
163,211 |
|
|
|
11,300 |
|
|
Average balance
|
|
|
31,931 |
|
|
|
186,662 |
|
|
|
69,319 |
|
|
|
9,285 |
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum month-end balance
|
|
$ |
55,810 |
|
|
$ |
78,050 |
|
|
$ |
78,050 |
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
55,810 |
|
|
|
33,594 |
|
|
|
78,050 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
Average balance
|
|
|
40,288 |
|
|
|
52,513 |
|
|
|
41,939 |
|
|
|
5,047 |
|
Total Short-Term Borrowed Funds
|
|
$ |
55,810 |
|
|
$ |
185,494 |
|
|
$ |
241,261 |
|
|
$ |
17,300 |
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of period
|
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
2.23 |
% |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
|
2.37 |
% |
Weighted average interest rate during period/year
|
|
|
2.42 |
% |
|
|
1.87 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
59
Since growth in core deposits may be at intervals different from
loan demand, we may follow a pattern of funding irregular growth
in assets with short-term borrowings, which are then replaced
with core deposits. This temporary funding source is likely to
be utilized for generally short-term periods, although no
assurance can be given that this will, in fact, occur.
Liquidity
The ability to have readily available funds sufficient to repay
fully maturing liabilities is of primary importance to
depositors, creditors and regulators. Our liquidity, represented
by cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and
available-for-sale securities, is a result of our operating,
investing and financing activities and related cash flows. In
order to ensure funds are available at all times, on at least a
quarterly basis, we project the amount of funds that will be
required and maintain relationships with a diversified customer
base so funds are accessible. Liquidity requirements can also be
met through short-term borrowings or the disposition of
short-term assets. We have borrowing lines at correspondent
banks totaling $45.0 million. In addition, securities are
pledged to the FHLB totaling $491.5 million on total
borrowings from the FHLB of $63.7 million as of
September 30, 2005. As of September 30, 2005, we had
$45.1 million in securities available to be sold or pledged
to the FHLB.
We have a formal liquidity policy, and in the opinion of
management, our liquid assets are considered adequate to meet
our cash flow needs for loan funding and deposit cash withdrawal
for the next 60 90 days. At September 30,
2005, we had $890.6 million in liquid assets comprised of
$294.6 million in cash and cash equivalents (including
federal funds sold of $204.0 million) and
$596.0 million in available-for-sale securities.
On a long-term basis, our liquidity will be met by changing the
relative distribution of our asset portfolios, for example,
reducing investment or loan volumes, or selling or encumbering
assets. Further, we will increase liquidity by soliciting higher
levels of deposit accounts through promotional activities and/or
borrowing from our correspondent banks as well as the Federal
Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. At the current time,
our long-term liquidity needs primarily relate to funds required
to support loan originations and commitments and deposit
withdrawals. All of these needs can currently be met by cash
flows from investment payments and maturities, and investment
sales if the need arises.
Our liquidity is comprised of three primary classifications:
(i) cash flows from or used in operating activities;
(ii) cash flows from or used in investing activities; and
(iii) cash flows provided by or used in financing
activities. Net cash provided by or used in operating activities
consists primarily of net income adjusted for changes in certain
other asset and liability accounts and certain non-cash income
and expense items such as the loan loss provision, investment
and other amortizations and depreciation. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2005, net cash provided by operating
activities was $21.3 million, compared to
$18.3 million for the same period in 2004. For the years
ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 net cash
provided by operating activities was $27.3, $12.7 million
and $10.1 million, respectively.
Our primary investing activities are the origination of real
estate, commercial and consumer loans and purchase and sale of
securities. Our net cash provided by and used in investing
activities has been primarily influenced by our loan and
securities activities. The net increase in loans for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 was
$429.2 million and $352.4 million, respectively. The
net increase in loans for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002 was $455.5 million, $268.8 million
and $58.0 million, respectively. Proceeds from maturities
and sales of securities, net of purchases of securities
available-for-sale and
held-to-maturity for
the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were
$71.0 million, compared to net purchases of
$144.9 million for the same period in 2004. Net purchases
of securities for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002 were $133.5 million, $514.0 million and
$220.6 million, respectively.
Net cash provided by financing activities has been impacted
significantly by increases in deposit levels. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 deposits increased
by $591.5 million and $595.3 million, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
deposits increased by $661.4 million, $374.3 million
and $171.0 million, respectively.
60
Our federal funds sold increased $180.9 million from
December 31, 2004 to September 30, 2005. This is due
to the growth in our deposits combined with the decrease of our
investment portfolio over the same period.
Federal and state banking regulations place certain restrictions
on dividends paid by the subsidiary banks of Western Alliance.
The total amount of dividends which may be paid at any date is
generally limited to the retained earnings of each subsidiary
bank. Dividends paid by the subsidiary banks to Western Alliance
would be prohibited if the effect thereof would cause the
respective banks capital to be reduced below applicable
minimum capital requirements.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss in a financial instrument
arising from adverse changes in market prices and rates, foreign
currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. Our
market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in
our lending, investing and deposit taking activities. To that
end, management actively monitors and manages our interest rate
risk exposure. We do not have any market risk sensitive
instruments entered into for trading purposes. We manage our
interest rate sensitivity by matching the re-pricing
opportunities on our earning assets to those on our funding
liabilities.
Management uses various asset/liability strategies to manage the
re-pricing characteristics of our assets and liabilities
designed to ensure that exposure to interest rate fluctuations
is limited within our guidelines of acceptable levels of
risk-taking. Hedging strategies, including the terms and pricing
of loans and deposits, and management of the deployment of our
securities are used to reduce mismatches in interest rate
re-pricing opportunities of portfolio assets and their funding
sources.
Interest rate risk is addressed by each banks Asset
Liability Management Committee, or ALCO, which is comprised of
senior finance, operations, human resources and lending
officers. ALCO monitors interest rate risk by analyzing the
potential impact on the net economic value of equity and net
interest income from potential changes in interest rates, and
consider the impact of alternative strategies or changes in
balance sheet structure. We manage our balance sheet in part to
maintain the potential impact on economic value of equity and
net interest income within acceptable ranges despite changes in
interest rates.
Our exposure to interest rate risk is reviewed on at least a
quarterly basis by each ALCO. Interest rate risk exposure is
measured using interest rate sensitivity analysis to determine
our change in economic value of equity in the event of
hypothetical changes in interest rates. If potential changes to
net economic value of equity and net interest income resulting
from hypothetical interest rate changes are not within the
limits established by our Board of Directors, the Board of
Directors may direct management to adjust the asset and
liability mix to bring interest rate risk within board-approved
limits.
Economic Value of Equity. We measure the impact of market
interest rate changes on the net present value of estimated cash
flows from our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items,
defined as economic value of equity, using a simulation model.
This simulation model assesses the changes in the market value
of interest rate sensitive financial instruments that would
occur in response to an instantaneous and sustained increase or
decrease (shock) in market interest rates.
61
At September 30, 2005 our economic value of equity exposure
related to these hypothetical changes in market interest rates
was within the current guidelines established by us. The
following table shows our projected change in economic value of
equity for this set of rate shock as of September 30, 2005.
Economic Value of Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
Percentage | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
Economic | |
|
Change | |
|
of Total | |
|
of Equity | |
Interest Rate Scenario |
|
Value | |
|
from Base | |
|
Assets | |
|
Book Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in millions) | |
Up 300 basis points
|
|
$ |
440.4 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
184.8 |
% |
Up 200 basis points
|
|
|
435.8 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
182.9 |
|
Up 100 basis points
|
|
|
429.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
180.3 |
|
BASE
|
|
|
422.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
177.4 |
|
Down 100 basis points
|
|
|
412.1 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
172.9 |
|
Down 200 basis points
|
|
|
393.0 |
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
164.9 |
|
Down 300 basis points
|
|
|
365.6 |
|
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
153.4 |
|
The computation of prospective effects of hypothetical interest
rate changes are based on numerous assumptions, including
relative levels of market interest rates, asset prepayments and
deposit decay, and should not be relied upon as indicative of
actual results. Further, the computations do not contemplate any
actions we may undertake in response to changes in interest
rates. Actual amounts may differ from the projections set forth
above should market conditions vary from the underlying
assumptions.
Net Interest Income Simulation. In order to measure
interest rate risk at September 30, 2005, we used a
simulation model to project changes in net interest income that
result from forecasted changes in interest rates. This analysis
calculates the difference between net interest income forecasted
using a rising and a falling interest rate scenario and a net
interest income using a base market interest rate derived from
the current treasury yield curve. The income simulation model
includes various assumptions regarding the re-pricing
relationships for each of our products. Many of our assets are
floating rate loans, which are assumed to re-price immediately,
and proportional to the change in market rates, depending on
their contracted index. Some loans and investments include the
opportunity of prepayment (embedded options), and accordingly
the simulation model uses indexes to estimate these prepayments
and reinvest their proceeds at current yields. Our non-term
deposit products re-price more slowly, usually changing less
than the change in market rates and at our discretion.
This analysis indicates the impact of changes in net interest
income for the given set of rate changes and assumptions. It
assumes the balance sheet remains static and that its structure
does not change over the course of the year. It does not account
for all factors that impact this analysis, including changes by
management to mitigate the impact of interest rate changes or
secondary impacts such as changes to our credit risk profile as
interest rates change.
Furthermore, loan prepayment rate estimates and spread
relationships change regularly. Interest rate changes create
changes in actual loan prepayment rates that will differ from
the market estimates incorporated in this analysis. Changes that
vary significantly from the assumptions may have significant
effects on our net interest income.
For the rising and falling interest rate scenarios, the base
market interest rate forecast was increased and decreased over
twelve months by 100, 200 and 300 points. At September 30,
2005, our net interest margin exposure related to these
hypothetical changes in market interest rates was within the
current guidelines established by us.
62
Sensitivity of Net Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
Adjusted Net | |
|
Change | |
Interest Rate Scenario |
|
Interest Income | |
|
from Base | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Up 300 basis points
|
|
$ |
121.4 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
Up 200 basis points
|
|
|
120.6 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Up 100 basis points
|
|
|
118.3 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
BASE
|
|
|
114.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Down 100 basis points
|
|
|
110.2 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
Down 200 basis points
|
|
|
107.8 |
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
Down 300 basis points
|
|
|
107.0 |
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
|
|
FAS No. 123(R), Shared-Based Payment, Revised
December 2004 |
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
published FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment, or FAS 123(R). FAS 123(R)
requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based
payment transactions, including grants of employee stock
options, be recognized in financial statements. That cost will
be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability
instruments issued. FAS 123(R) permits entities to use any
option-pricing model that meets the fair value objective in the
Statement. Modifications of share-based payments will be treated
as replacement awards with the cost of the incremental value
recorded in the financial statements.
The Statement became effective at the beginning of the first
quarter of 2006. As of the effective date, we now apply the
Statement using a modified version of prospective application.
Under that transition method, compensation cost is recognized
for (1) all awards granted after the required effective
date and to awards modified, cancelled, or repurchased after
that date and (2) the portion of awards granted subsequent
to completion of an IPO and prior to the effective date for
which the requisite service has not yet been rendered, based on
the grant-date fair value of those awards calculated for pro
forma disclosures under SFAS 123.
The impact of this Statement on the Company in 2006 and beyond
will depend on various factors including our future compensation
strategy.
|
|
|
FASB Interpretation (FIN) 46, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities |
FIN 46 establishes accounting guidance for consolidation of
variable interest entities, or VIE, that function to support the
activities of the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary
of a VIE is the entity that absorbs a majority of the VIEs
expected losses, receives a majority of the VIEs expected
residual returns, or both, as a result of controlling ownership
interest, contractual relationship or other business
relationship with VIE. Prior to the implementation of
FIN 46, VIEs were generally consolidated by an
enterprise when the enterprise had a controlling financial
interest through ownership of a majority of voting interest in
the entity. The provisions of FIN 46 were effective
immediately for all arrangements entered into after
January 31, 2003. However, subsequent revisions to the
interpretation deferred the implementation date of FIN 46
until the first period ending after March 15, 2004.
We adopted FIN 46, as revised, in connection with our
consolidated financial statements that are included herein. The
implementation of FIN 46 required us to de-consolidate our
investment in BankWest Nevada Capital Trusts I and II because we
are not the primary beneficiary. Previous years were restated
accordingly. There was no impact on stockholders equity or
net income upon adoption of the standard.
63
INFORMATION ABOUT WESTERN ALLIANCE
Unless the context otherwise requires, in this section the terms
we, us and our refer to
Western Alliance on a consolidated basis.
Overview and History
We are a bank holding company headquartered in Las Vegas,
Nevada. We provide a full range of banking and related services
to locally owned businesses, professional firms, real estate
developers and investors, local non-profit organizations, high
net worth individuals and other consumers through our subsidiary
banks and financial services companies located in Nevada,
Arizona and California. On a consolidated basis, as of
September 30, 2005, we had approximately $2.7 billion
in assets, $1.6 billion in total loans, $2.3 billion
in deposits and $238.3 million in stockholders
equity. We have focused our lending activities primarily on
commercial loans, which comprised 84.0% of our total loan
portfolio at September 30, 2005. In addition to traditional
lending and deposit gathering capabilities, we also offer a
broad array of financial products and services aimed at
satisfying the needs of small to mid-sized businesses and their
proprietors, including cash management, trust administration and
estate planning, custody and investments and equipment leasing.
BankWest of Nevada was founded in 1994 by a group of individuals
with extensive community banking experience in the Las Vegas
market. We believe our success has been built on the strength of
our management team, our conservative credit culture, the
attractive growth characteristics of the markets in which we
operate and our ability to expand our franchise by attracting
seasoned bankers with long-standing relationships in their
communities.
In 2003, with the support of local banking veterans, we opened
Alliance Bank of Arizona in Phoenix, Arizona and Torrey Pines
Bank in San Diego, California. Over the past two years we
have successfully leveraged the expertise and strengths of
Western Alliance and BankWest of Nevada to build and expand
these new banks in a rapid and efficient manner. Our success is
evidenced by the fact that, of the 230 banks founded in the
United States since January 1, 2003, Alliance Bank of
Arizona and Torrey Pines Bank both rank among the top ten in
terms of total assets, loans and deposits as of
September 30, 2005.
Through our wholly owned, non-bank subsidiaries, Miller/
Russell & Associates, Inc. and Premier Trust, Inc., we
provide investment advisory and wealth management services,
including trust administration and estate planning. We acquired
Miller/ Russell and Premier Trust in May 2004 and December 2003,
respectively. As of September 30, 2005, Miller/ Russell had
$1.10 billion in assets under management, and Premier Trust
had $131.9 million in assets under management and
$247.7 million in total trust assets.
On January 16, 2006 we entered into an agreement and plan
of merger with Bank of Nevada. See Recent Developments of
Western Alliance.
We have achieved significant growth. Specifically, from
December 31, 2000 to September 30, 2005, we increased:
|
|
|
|
|
total assets from $443.7 million to $2.7 billion; |
|
|
|
total net loans from $319.6 million to $1.6 billion; |
|
|
|
total deposits from $410.2 million to
$2.3 billion; and |
|
|
|
core deposits (all deposits other than certificates of deposit
greater than $100,000) from $355.8 million to
$2.1 billion. |
64
Because our deposit growth has outpaced our loan growth, at
September 30, 2005 we had a relatively low
loan-to-deposit ratio
of 68.9%. Our long-term goal is to increase this ratio by
continuing to grow our loan portfolio, while maintaining our
strong credit quality. To achieve this goal, we intend to
continue to expand our lending activities by hiring experienced
relationship bankers and adding new product offerings. In this
regard, we have recently begun offering SBA 7(a) loans and
equipment leasing, and originating residential mortgage loans
for our own portfolio, rather than acting as a broker.
Business Strategy
Since 1994, we believe that we have been successful in building
and developing our operations by adhering to a business strategy
focused on understanding and serving the needs of our local
clients and pursuing growth markets and opportunities while
emphasizing a strong credit culture. Our objective is to provide
our shareholders with superior returns. The critical components
of our strategy include:
|
|
|
|
|
Leveraging our knowledge and expertise. Over the past
decade we have assembled an experienced management team and
built a culture committed to credit quality and operational
efficiency. We have also successfully centralized at our holding
company level a significant portion of our operations,
processing, compliance, Community Reinvestment Act
administration and specialty functions. We intend to grow our
franchise and improve our operating efficiencies by continuing
to leverage our managerial expertise and the functions we have
centralized at Western Alliance. |
|
|
|
Maintaining a strong credit culture. We adhere to a
specific set of credit standards across our bank subsidiaries
that ensure the proper management of credit risk. Western
Alliances management team plays an active role in
monitoring compliance with our Banks credit standards.
Western Alliance also continually monitors each of our
subsidiary banks loan portfolios, which enables us to
identify and take prompt corrective action on potentially
problematic loans. As of September 30, 2005, non-performing
assets represented approximately 0.01% of total assets. The
average for similarly sized publicly traded banks in the United
States was 0.40% as of September 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
Attracting seasoned relationship bankers and leveraging our
local market knowledge. We believe our success has been the
result, in part, of our ability to attract and retain
experienced relationship bankers that have strong relationships
in their communities. These professionals bring with them
valuable customer relationships, and have been an integral part
of our ability to expand rapidly in our market areas. These
professionals allow us to be responsive to the needs of our
customers and provide a high level of service to local
businesses. We intend to continue to hire experienced
relationship bankers as we expand our franchise. |
|
|
|
Focusing on markets with attractive growth prospects. We
operate in what we believe to be highly attractive markets with
superior growth prospects. Our metropolitan areas have a high
per capita income and are expected to experience some of the
fastest population growth in the country. We continuously
evaluate new markets in the Western United States with similar
growth characteristics as targets for expansion. Our long term
strategy is to have four to six subsidiary banks each with
assets between $500.0 million and $3.0 billion. We
intend to implement this strategy through the formation of
additional de novo banks or acquiring other commercial
banks in new market areas with attractive growth prospects. As
of September 30, 2005, we maintained 15 bank branch offices
located throughout our market areas. To accommodate our growth
and enhance efficiency, we intend to expand over the next
12 months to an aggregate of 24 offices, and to open a
service center facility that will provide centralized
back-office services and call center support for all our banking
subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
Attracting low cost deposits. We believe we have been
able to attract a stable base of low-cost deposits from
customers who are attracted to our personalized level of service
and local knowledge. As of September 30, 2005, our deposit
base was comprised of 44.7% non-interest bearing deposits, of
which 40.7% consisted of title company deposits, 54.5% consisted
of other business deposits and 4.8% consisted of consumer
deposits. Given our relatively current
loan-to-deposit ratio
of 68.9%, we expect to obtain additional value in the future by
leveraging our low-cost deposit base to increase quality credit
relationships. |
65
Our Market Areas
We believe that there is a significant market segment of small
to mid-sized businesses that are looking for a locally based
commercial bank capable of providing a high degree of
flexibility and responsiveness, in addition to offering a broad
range of financial products and services. We believe that the
local community banks that compete in our markets do not offer
the same breadth of products and services that our customers
require to meet their growing needs, while the large, national
banks lack the flexibility and personalized service that our
customers desire in their banking relationships. By offering
flexibility and responsiveness to our customers and providing a
full range of financial products and services, we believe that
we can better serve our markets.
Through our banking and non-banking subsidiaries, we serve
customers in Nevada, Arizona and California.
Nevada. In Nevada, we operate in the cities of Las Vegas
and Henderson, both of which are in the Las Vegas
metropolitan area. The economy of the Las Vegas metropolitan
area is primarily driven by services and industries related to
gaming, entertainment and tourism, and is experiencing growth in
the residential and commercial construction and light
manufacturing sectors.
Arizona. In Arizona, we operate in Phoenix and
Scottsdale, which are located in the Phoenix metropolitan area,
and Tucson, which is located in the Tucson metropolitan area.
These metropolitan areas contain companies in the following
industries: aerospace, high-tech manufacturing, construction,
energy, transportation, minerals and mining and financial
services.
California. In California, we operate in the cities of
San Diego and La Mesa, both of which are in the
San Diego metropolitan area. The business community in the
San Diego metropolitan area includes numerous small to
medium-sized businesses and service and professional firms that
operate in a diverse number of industries, including the
entertainment, defense and aerospace, construction, health care
and pharmaceutical, and computer and telecommunications
industries.
We currently operate in what we believe to be several of the
most attractive markets in the Western United States. These
markets have high per capita income and are expected to
experience some of the fastest population growth in the country.
Claritas, Inc., a leading provider of demographic data, projects
significant population growth in our metropolitan areas between
2004 and 2009.
We believe that the rapid population growth and attractive
economic factors of our markets will provide us with significant
opportunities in the future. The growth in the Las Vegas
metropolitan area, our primary market, has been driven by a
variety of factors, including a service economy associated with
the hospitality and gaming industries, affordable housing, no
state income taxation, and a growth base of senior or retirement
communities. Increased economic activity by individuals and
accelerated infrastructure investments by businesses should
generate additional demand for our products and services. For
example, economic growth should produce additional commercial
and residential development, providing us with greater lending
opportunities. In addition, as per capita income continues to
rise, there should be greater opportunities to provide financial
products and services, such as checking accounts and wealth and
asset management services.
Operations
Our operations are conducted through the following wholly owned
subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest of Nevada. BankWest of Nevada is a
Nevada-chartered commercial bank headquartered in Las Vegas,
Nevada. BankWest of Nevada opened for business in 1994. As of
September 30, 2005, the bank had $1.8 billion in
assets, $991.3 million in net loans and $1.6 billion
in deposits. BankWest of Nevada has three full- service offices
in Las Vegas and two in Henderson. |
|
|
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona. Alliance Bank of Arizona is an
Arizona-chartered commercial bank headquartered in Phoenix,
Arizona. As of September 30, 2005, the bank had
$514.1 million in assets, $353.7 million in net loans
and $460.1 million in deposits. Alliance Bank has two
full-service offices in Phoenix, two in Tucson and one in
Scottsdale. |
66
|
|
|
|
|
Torrey Pines Bank. Torrey Pines Bank is a
California-chartered commercial bank headquartered in
San Diego, California. As of September 30, 2005, the
bank had $357.3 million in assets, $253.3 million in
net loans and $315.1 million in deposits. Torrey Pines has
two full-service offices in San Diego and one in
La Mesa. |
|
|
|
Miller/ Russell & Associates, Inc. Miller/
Russell offers investment advisory services to businesses,
individuals and non-profit entities. As of September 30,
2005, Miller/ Russell had $1.1 billion in assets under
management. Miller/ Russell has offices in Phoenix, Tucson,
San Diego and Las Vegas. |
|
|
|
Premier Trust, Inc. Premier Trust offers clients wealth
management services, including trust administration of personal
and retirement accounts, estate and financial planning, custody
services and investments. As of September 30, 2005, Premier
Trust had $247.7 million in trust assets and
$131.9 million in assets under management. Premier Trust
has offices in Las Vegas and Phoenix. |
Lending Activities
We provide a variety of loans to our customers, including
commercial and residential real estate loans, construction and
land development loans, commercial loans, and to a lesser
extent, consumer loans. Our lending efforts have focused on
meeting the needs of our business customers, who have typically
required funding for commercial and commercial real estate
enterprises. Commercial loans comprised 84.0% of our total loan
portfolio at September 30, 2005. We intend to continue
expanding our lending activities and have recently begun
offering SBA 7(a) loans and equipment leasing.
Commercial Real Estate Loans. The majority of our lending
activity consists of loans to finance the purchase of commercial
real estate and loans to finance inventory and working capital
that are secured by commercial real estate. We have a commercial
real estate portfolio comprised of loans on apartment buildings,
professional offices, industrial facilities, retail centers and
other commercial properties. As of September 30, 2005,
53.6% of our commercial real estate and construction loans were
owner occupied.
Construction and Land Development Loans. The principal
types of our construction loans include industrial/warehouse
properties, office buildings, retail centers, medical
facilities, restaurants and, on occasion, luxury single-family
homes. Construction and land development loans are primarily
made only to experienced local developers with whom we have a
sufficient lending history. An analysis of each construction
project is performed as part of the underwriting process to
determine whether the type of property, location, construction
costs and contingency funds are appropriate and adequate. We
extend raw commercial land loans primarily to borrowers who plan
to initiate active development of the property within two years.
Commercial and Industrial Loans. In addition to real
estate related loan products, we also originate commercial and
industrial loans, including working capital lines of credit,
inventory and accounts receivable lines, equipment loans and
other commercial loans. We focus on making commercial loans to
small and medium-sized businesses in a wide variety of
industries. We also are a Preferred Lender in
Arizona with the SBA. We intend to increase our commitment to
this product line in the future.
Residential Loans. We originate residential mortgage
loans secured by one- to four-family properties, most of which
serve as the primary residence of the owner. Our primary focus
is to maintain and expand relationships with realtors and other
key contacts in the residential real estate industry in order to
originate new mortgages. Most of our loan originations result
from relationships with existing or past customers, members of
our local community, and referrals from realtors, attorneys and
builders.
Consumer Loans. We offer a variety of consumer loans to
meet customer demand and to increase the yield on our loan
portfolio. Consumer loans are generally offered at a higher rate
and shorter term than residential mortgages. Examples of our
consumer loans include:
|
|
|
|
|
home equity loans and lines of credit; |
|
|
|
home improvement loans; |
|
|
|
new and used automobile loans; and |
|
|
|
personal lines of credit. |
67
Currently, we offer credit cards to our customers through an
unrelated third party. We recognize nominal fee income under
this arrangement. Later this year, we intend to begin offering
credit cards to be held for our own portfolio.
As of September 30, 2005 our loan portfolio totaled
$1.6 billion, or approximately 58.9% of our total assets.
The following tables set forth the composition and geographic
concentration of our loan portfolio as of September 30,
2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
Loan Type |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in millions) | |
Commercial Real Estate
|
|
$ |
655.0 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
% |
Construction and Land Development
|
|
|
397.0 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
307.0 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
Residential Real Estate
|
|
|
239.5 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Loans
|
|
$ |
1,619.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Loan Fees
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Loans, net of deferred loan fees
|
|
$ |
1,617.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Policies and Administration
We adhere to a specific set of credit standards across our bank
subsidiaries that ensure the proper management of credit risk.
Furthermore, our holding companys management team plays an
active role in monitoring compliance with such standards by our
banks.
Loan originations are subject to a process that includes the
credit evaluation of borrowers, established lending limits,
analysis of collateral, and procedures for continual monitoring
and identification of credit deterioration. Loan officers
actively monitor their individual credit relationships in order
to report suspected risks and potential downgrades as early as
possible. The respective boards of directors of each of our
banking subsidiaries establish their own loan policies, as well
as loan limit authorizations. Except for variances to reflect
unique aspects of state law and local market conditions, our
lending policies generally incorporate consistent underwriting
standards. We monitor all changes to each respective banks
loan policy to promote this philosophy. Our credit culture has
helped us to identify troubled credits early, allowing us to
take corrective action when necessary. The following tables show
our historical asset quality relative to similarly-sized
publicly traded financial institutions in the United States.
|
|
|
Loan Approval Procedures and Authority |
Our loan approval procedures are executed through a tiered loan
limit authorization process which is structured as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Authorities. The board of directors of each
subsidiary bank sets the authorization levels for individual
loan officers on a case-by-case basis. Generally, the more
experienced a loan officer, the higher the authorization level.
The average approval authority for individual loan officers is
approximately $475,000 for secured loans and approximately
$199,000 for unsecured loans. The maximum approval authority for
a loan officer is $1.5 million for secured loans and
$750,000 for unsecured loans. |
|
|
|
Management Loan Committees. Credits in excess of
individual loan limits are submitted to the appropriate
banks Management Loan Committee. The Management
Loan Committees consist of members of the senior management
team of that bank and are chaired by that banks chief
credit |
68
|
|
|
|
|
officer. The Management Loan Committees have approval
authority up to $3.0 million at BankWest of Nevada,
$5.0 million at Alliance Bank of Arizona and
$2.5 million at Torrey Pines Bank. |
|
|
|
Credit Administration. Credits in excess of the
Management Loan Committee authority are submitted by the
bank subsidiary to Western Alliances Credit
Administration. Credit Administration consists of the chief
credit officers of Western Alliance and BankWest of Nevada.
Credit Administration has approval authority up to
$18.0 million. |
|
|
|
Board of Director Oversight. The Chairman of the Board of
Directors of Western Alliance acting with the Chairman of the
Credit Committee has approval authority up to each respective
banks legal lending limit (approximately
$35.1 million for BankWest of Nevada, $7.3 million for
Alliance Bank of Arizona, and $9.1 million for Torrey Pines
Bank, each as of September 30, 2005). |
Our credit administration department works independent of loan
production.
Loans to One Borrower. In addition to the limits set
forth above, state banking law generally limits the amount of
funds that a bank may lend to a single borrower. Under Nevada
law, the total amount of outstanding loans that a bank may make
to a single borrower generally may not exceed 25% of
stockholders equity. Under Arizona law, the obligations of
one borrower to a bank may not exceed 15% of the banks
capital. Under California law, the obligations of any one
borrower to a bank generally may not exceed 25% of the sum of
the banks shareholders equity, allowance for loan
losses, capital notes and debentures.
As of September 30, 2005, the largest aggregate amount
loaned by our subsidiary banks to one borrower was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest of Nevada: $14.5 million, consisting of a letter
of credit in favor of FNMA on behalf of a single asset entity
which develops age restricted apartments; |
|
|
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona: $12.6 million, consisting of an
$11.4 million real estate loan to a
60-physician medical
clinic, secured by the underlying property, and the remainder
for multiple equipment loans, secured by the underlying
equipment; and |
|
|
|
Torrey Pines Bank: $10.4 million, consisting of lines of
credit to a construction contractor for the development of
single family and other residential properties. |
Notwithstanding the above limits, because of our business model,
our affiliate banks are able to leverage their relationships
with one another to participate in loans collectively which they
otherwise would not be able to accommodate on an individual
basis. As of September 30, 2005, the aggregate lending
limit of our subsidiary banks was approximately
$51.4 million.
Concentrations of Credit Risk. Our lending policies also
establish customer and product concentration limits to control
single customer and product exposures. As these policies are
directional and not absolute, at any particular point in time
the ratios may be higher or lower because of funding on
outstanding commitments. Set forth below are our lending
policies and the segmentation of our loan portfolio by loan type
as of September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total Capital | |
|
Percent of Total Loans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Policy Limit | |
|
Actual | |
|
Policy Limit | |
|
Actual | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Commercial Real Estate Term
|
|
|
400 |
% |
|
|
247 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
Construction
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Residential Real Estate
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
69
Asset Quality
One of our key strategies is to maintain high asset quality. We
have instituted a loan grading system consisting of nine
different categories. The first five are considered
satisfactory. The other four grades range from a
watch category to a loss category and
are consistent with the grading systems used by the FDIC. All
loans are assigned a credit risk grade at the time they are
made, and each originating loan officer reviews the credit with
his or her immediate supervisor on a quarterly basis to
determine whether a change in the credit risk grade is
warranted. In addition, the grading of our loan portfolio is
reviewed annually by an external, independent loan review firm.
If a borrower fails to make a scheduled payment on a loan, we
attempt to remedy the deficiency by contacting the borrower and
seeking payment. Contacts generally are made within 15 business
days after the payment becomes past due. Our Special Assets
Department reviews all delinquencies on a monthly basis. Each
banks chief credit officer can approve charge-offs up to
$5,000. Amounts in excess of $5,000 require the approval of each
banks respective board of directors. Loans deemed
uncollectible are proposed for charge-off on a monthly basis at
each respective banks monthly board meeting.
Our policies require that the chief credit officer of each bank
continuously monitor the status of that banks loan
portfolio and prepare and present to the board of directors a
monthly report listing all credits 30 days or more past
due. All relationships graded substandard or worse
typically are transferred to the Special Assets Department for
corrective action. In addition, we prepare detailed status
reports for all relationships rated watch or lower
on a quarterly basis. These reports are provided to management
and the board of directors of the applicable bank and Western
Alliance.
Our policy is to classify all loans 90 days or more past
due and all loans on a non-accrual status as
substandard or worse, unless extraordinary
circumstances suggest otherwise.
We generally stop accruing income on loans when interest or
principal payments are in arrears for 90 days, or earlier
if the banks management deems appropriate. We designate
loans on which we stop accruing income as non-accrual loans and
we reverse outstanding interest that we previously credited. We
recognize income in the period in which we collect it, when the
ultimate collectibility of principal is no longer in doubt. We
return non-accrual loans to accrual status when factors
indicating doubtful collection no longer exist and the loan has
been brought current.
Federal regulations require that each insured bank classify its
assets on a regular basis. In addition, in connection with
examinations of insured institutions, examiners have authority
to identify problem assets, and, if appropriate, classify them.
We use grades six through nine of our loan grading system to
identify potential problem assets.
The following describes grades six through nine of our loan
grading system:
|
|
|
|
|
Watch List/ Special Mention. Generally these
are assets that require more than normal management attention.
These loans may involve borrowers with adverse financial trends,
higher debt/equity ratios, or weaker liquidity positions, but
not to the degree of being considered a problem loan
where risk of loss may be apparent. Loans in this category are
usually performing as agreed, although there may be some minor
non-compliance with financial covenants. |
|
|
|
Substandard. These assets contain
well-defined credit weaknesses and are characterized by the
distinct possibility that the bank will sustain some loss if
such weakness or deficiency is not corrected. These loans
generally are adequately secured and in the event of a
foreclosure action or liquidation, the |
70
|
|
|
|
|
bank should be protected from loss. All loans 90 days or
more past due and all loans on non-accrual are considered at
least substandard, unless extraordinary
circumstances would suggest otherwise. |
|
|
|
Doubtful. These assets have an extremely high
probability of loss, but because of certain known factors which
may work to the advantage and strengthening of the asset (for
example, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional
collateral and refinancing plans), classification as an
estimated loss is deferred until a more precise status may be
determined. |
|
|
|
Loss. These assets are considered
uncollectible, and of such little value that their continuance
as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification does
not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage
value, but rather that it is not practicable or desirable to
defer writing off the asset, even though partial recovery may be
achieved in the future. |
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses reflects our evaluation of the
probable losses in our loan portfolio. Although management at
each of our banking subsidiaries establishes its own allowance
for loan losses, each bank utilizes consistent evaluation
procedures. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a
level that represents each banks managements best
estimate of losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet
date that are both probable and reasonably estimable. We
maintain the allowance through provisions for loan losses that
we charge to income. We charge losses on loans against the
allowance for loan losses when we believe the collection of loan
principal is unlikely. Recoveries on loans charged-off are
restored to the allowance for loan losses.
Our evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses
includes the review of all loans for which the collectibility of
principal may not be reasonably assured. For commercial real
estate and commercial loans, review of financial performance,
payment history and collateral values is conducted on a
quarterly basis by the lending staff, and the results of that
review are then reviewed by Credit Administration. For
residential mortgage and consumer loans, this review primarily
considers delinquencies and collateral values.
The criteria that we consider in connection with determining the
overall allowance for loan losses include:
|
|
|
|
|
results of the quarterly credit quality review; |
|
|
|
historical loss experience in each segment of the loan portfolio; |
|
|
|
general economic and business conditions affecting our key
lending areas; |
|
|
|
credit quality trends (including trends in non-performing loans
expected to result from existing conditions); |
|
|
|
collateral values; |
|
|
|
loan volumes and concentrations; |
|
|
|
age of the loan portfolio; |
|
|
|
specific industry conditions within portfolio segments; |
|
|
|
duration of the current business cycle; |
|
|
|
bank regulatory examination results; and |
|
|
|
external loan review results. |
Additions to the allowance for loan losses may be made when
management has identified significant adverse conditions or
circumstances related to a specific loan. Management
continuously reviews the entire loan portfolio to determine the
extent to which additional loan loss provisions might be deemed
necessary. However, there can be no assurance that the allowance
for loan losses will be adequate to cover all losses that may in
fact be realized in the future or that additional provisions for
loan losses will not be required.
71
Various regulatory agencies, as well as our outsourced loan
review function, as an integral part of their review process,
periodically review our loan portfolios and the related
allowance for loan losses. Regulatory agencies may require us to
increase the allowance for loan losses based on their review of
information available to them at the time of their examination.
As of September 30, 2005, our allowance for loan losses was
$19.3 million. The allowance coverage to total loans was
1.19% as of September 30, 2005.
Investment Activities
Each of our banking subsidiaries has its own investment policy,
which is established by our board of directors and is approved
by each respective banks board of directors. These
policies dictate that investment decisions will be made based on
the safety of the investment, liquidity requirements, potential
returns, cash flow targets, and consistency with our interest
rate risk management. Each banks chief financial officer
is responsible for making securities portfolio decisions in
accordance with established policies. The chief financial
officer has the authority to purchase and sell securities within
specified guidelines established by the investment policy. All
transactions for a specific bank are reviewed by that
banks board of directors on a monthly basis.
Our investment policies generally limit securities investments
to U.S. Government, agency and sponsored entity securities
and municipal bonds, as well as investments in preferred and
common stock of government sponsored entities, such as Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Bank. The
policies also permit investments in mortgage-backed securities,
including pass-through securities issued and guaranteed by
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae, as well as
collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) issued or
backed by securities issued by these government agencies and
privately issued investment grade CMOs. Privately issued CMOs
typically offer higher rates than those paid on government
agency CMOs, but lack the guaranty of such agencies and
typically there is less market liquidity than agency bonds. The
policies also permit investments in securities issued or backed
by the SBA. Our current investment strategy uses a risk
management approach of diversified investing in fixed-rate
securities with short- to intermediate-term maturities. The
emphasis of this approach is to increase overall securities
yields while managing interest rate risk. To accomplish these
objectives, we focus on investments in mortgage-backed
securities and CMOs.
All of our investment securities are classified as
available for sale or held to maturity
pursuant to SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Available for
sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized
gains and losses excluded from earnings and instead reported as
a separate component of stockholders equity. Held to
maturity securities are those securities that we have both the
intent and the ability to hold to maturity. These securities are
carried at cost adjusted for amortization of premium and
accretion of discount.
As of September 30, 2005, we had an investment securities
portfolio of $713.1 million, representing approximately
26.0% of our total assets, with 100% of the portfolio invested
in AAA-rated securities. The average duration of our investment
securities is 2.7 years as of September 30, 2005. The
following table summarizes our investment securities portfolio
as of September 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in millions) | |
Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
$ |
552.5 |
|
|
|
77.5 |
|
U.S. Government Sponsored Agencies
|
|
|
137.5 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
Municipal Bonds, U.S. Treasuries & Other
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Securities
|
|
$ |
713.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had
an investment in BOLI of $51.2 million and
$26.2 million, respectively. We purchased the BOLI to help
offset employee benefit costs.
72
Deposit Products and Other Funding Sources
We offer a variety of deposit products to our customers,
including checking accounts, savings accounts, money market
accounts and other deposit accounts, including fixed-rate, fixed
maturity retail certificates of deposit ranging in terms from
30 days to five years, individual retirement accounts, and
non-retail certificates of deposit consisting of jumbo
certificates greater than or equal to $100,000. We have
historically focused on attracting low cost core deposits. As of
September 30, 2005, our deposit portfolio was comprised of
44.7% non-interest bearing deposits versus 14.5% non-interest
bearing deposits for similarly sized publicly traded commercial
banks at December 31, 2004. As of September 30, 2005,
our deposit portfolio was also comprised of 12.7% time deposits
while similarly sized publicly traded commercial banks had an
average of 42.9% time deposits.
Our non-interest bearing deposits consist of non-interest
bearing checking accounts, which, as of September 30, 2005,
were comprised of 40.7% title company deposits, which consist
primarily of deposits held in escrow pending the closing of
commercial and residential real estate transactions, and, to a
lesser extent, operating accounts for title companies; 54.5%
other business deposits, which consist primarily of operating
accounts for businesses; and 4.8% consumer deposits. We consider
these deposits to be core deposits. We believe these deposits
are generally not interest rate sensitive since these accounts
are not created for investment purposes. The competition for
these deposits in our markets is strong. We believe our success
in attracting and retaining these deposits is based on several
factors, including (1) the high level of service we provide
to our customers; (2) our ability to attract and retain
experienced relationship bankers who have strong relationships
in their communities; (3) our broad array of cash
management services; and (4) our competitive pricing on
earnings credits paid on these deposits. We intend to continue
our efforts to attract deposits from our business lending
relationships in order to maintain our low cost of funds and
improve our net interest margin. However, if we lost a
significant part of our low-cost deposit base, it would
negatively impact our profitability.
Deposit flows are significantly influenced by general and local
economic conditions, changes in prevailing interest rates,
internal pricing decisions and competition. Our deposits are
primarily obtained from areas surrounding our branch offices. In
order to attract and retain deposits, we rely on providing
quality service and introducing new products and services that
meet our customers needs.
Each subsidiary banks asset and liability committee sets
its own deposit rates. Our banks consider a number of factors
when determining their individual deposit rates, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Information on current and projected national and local economic
conditions and the outlook for interest rates; |
|
|
|
The competitive environment in the markets it operates in; |
|
|
|
Loan and deposit positions and forecasts, including any
concentrations in either; and |
|
|
|
FHLB advance rates and rates charged on other sources of funds. |
As of September 30, 2005, we had approximately
$2.3 billion in total deposits. The following table shows
our deposit composition as of September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in millions) | |
Non-interest Bearing Demand
|
|
$ |
1,048.2 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
Savings & Money Market
|
|
|
893.7 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
|
Time, $100k and over
|
|
|
275.3 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
Interest Bearing Demand
|
|
|
107.7 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Other Time
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits
|
|
$ |
2,347.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
In addition to our deposit base, we have access to other sources
of funding, including FHLB advances, repurchase agreements and
unsecured lines of credit with other financial institutions.
Additionally, in the past, we have accessed the capital markets
through trust preferred offerings.
Financial Products & Services
In addition to traditional commercial banking activities, we
provide other financial services to our customers, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Internet banking; |
|
|
|
Wire transfers; |
|
|
|
Electronic bill payment; |
|
|
|
Lock box services; |
|
|
|
Courier services; |
|
|
|
Cash vault; and |
|
|
|
Cash management services (including account reconciliation,
collections and sweep accounts). |
We have a service center facility currently under development in
the Las Vegas metropolitan area, which we anticipate will become
operational in the third quarter of 2006. We expect that this
facility, once completed, will increase our capacity to provide
courier, cash management and other business services.
Through Miller/ Russell, we provide customers with asset
allocation and investment advisory services. In addition, we
provide wealth management services including trust
administration of personal and retirement accounts, estate and
financial planning, custody services and investments through
Premier Trust. As of September 30, 2005, Miller/ Russell
had $1.1 billion in assets under management, and Premier
Trust had $131.9 million in assets under management and
$247.7 million in total trust assets.
Customer, Product and Geographic Concentrations
Approximately 79.8% of our loan portfolio as of
September 30, 2005 consisted of real estate secured loans,
including commercial real estate loans, construction and land
development loans and residential real estate loans. Our
business activities are currently focused in the Las Vegas,
San Diego, Tucson and Phoenix metropolitan areas.
Consequently, our business is dependent on the trends of these
regional economies. In addition, approximately 18.5% of our
deposits as of September 30, 2005 consisted of title
company deposits. No individual or single group of related
accounts is considered material in relation to our assets or
deposits or in relation to our overall business.
Competition
The banking and financial services business in our market areas
is highly competitive. This increasingly competitive environment
is a result primarily of growth in community banks, changes in
regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems,
and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial
services providers. We compete for loans, deposits and customers
with other commercial banks, local community banks, savings and
loan associations, securities and brokerage companies, mortgage
companies, insurance companies, finance companies, money market
funds, credit unions, and other non-bank financial services
providers. Many of these competitors are much larger in total
assets and capitalization, have greater access to capital
markets and offer a broader range of financial services than we
can offer.
Competition for deposit and loan products remains strong from
both banking and non-banking firms, and this competition
directly affects the rates of those products and the terms on
which they are offered to consumers. Technological innovation
continues to contribute to greater competition in domestic and
international financial services markets. Many customers now
expect a choice of several delivery systems and channels,
including telephone, mail, home computer and ATMs.
74
Mergers between financial institutions have placed additional
pressure on banks to consolidate their operations, reduce
expenses and increase revenues to remain competitive. In
addition, competition has intensified due to federal and state
interstate banking laws, which permit banking organizations to
expand geographically with fewer restrictions than in the past.
These laws allow banks to merge with other banks across state
lines, thereby enabling banks to establish or expand banking
operations in our market. The competitive environment is also
significantly impacted by federal and state legislation that
makes it easier for non-bank financial institutions to compete
with us.
Employees
As of September 30, 2005, we had 522 full-time
equivalent employees.
Properties
As of September 30, 2005, we conducted business at 16
full-service banking locations in Nevada, Arizona and
California. The aggregate net book value of our premises and
equipment was $36.9 million at September 30, 2005
(including land and buildings held for sale). The following
table sets forth certain information with respect to our offices
as of September 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned or | |
|
Original Year | |
|
|
Leased | |
|
Acquired/Term of Lease | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
BankWest of Nevada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southwest Regional Office
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
3985 S. Durango Drive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas, NV 89147 - 4131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henderson Regional Office
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
1997 |
|
|
2890 North Green Valley Parkway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henderson, NV 89014 - 0400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern/ Siena Heights Office
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
10199 South Eastern Avenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henderson, NV 89052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Regional Office
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2700 West Sahara Avenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas, NV 89102 - 1700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northwest Regional Office
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
6/1/98 - 5/31/2013 |
|
|
7251 West Lake Mead, Suite 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas, NV 89128 - 8351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Regional Office
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
2/1/03 - 8/1/2013 |
|
|
4646 E. Van Buren, #100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix, AZ 85008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scottsdale Office
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
10/1/03 - 9/30/08 |
|
|
7373 N. Scottsdale Road, A-195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scottsdale, AZ 85253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Plaza
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
7/26/04 - 7/31/09 |
|
|
2901 N. Central Avenue, Suite 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix, AZ 85012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tucson Regional Office
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
11/1/03 - 10/31/2013 |
|
|
4703 E. Camp Lowell Office |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tucson, AZ 85712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tucson Downtown Office
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
7/19/04 - 9/30/09 |
|
|
1 South Church Avenue, #950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tucson, AZ 85701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned or | |
|
Original Year | |
|
|
Leased | |
|
Acquired/Term of Lease | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Phoenix Biltmore Park Office
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2701 E. Camelback Road, ste.100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix, Arizona 85016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tucson Williams Center Office
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
200 S. Craycroft Road |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tucson, AZ 85711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Torrey Pines Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
La Mesa Office
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
8379 Center Drive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
La Mesa, CA 91942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carmel Valley Office
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
10/13/03 - 10/12/2013 |
|
|
12220 El Camino Real, Suite 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Diego, CA 92130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Downtown San Diego
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
5/1/03 - 4/30/08 |
|
|
550 West C Street, Suite 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Diego, CA 92101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller/ Russell & Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix Office
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
09/01/05 - 08/31/10 |
|
|
2701 E. Camelback Road, Suite 120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix, AZ 85016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Golden Triangle
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
08/01/05 - 07/31/2015 |
|
|
4350 Executive Drive, Suite 130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Diego, CA 92121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, during the next 12 months, we expect to open 8
additional banking offices and a service center facility in the
following areas:
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas, NV (3 branches and a service center facility) |
|
|
|
Henderson, NV (1 branch) |
|
|
|
North Las Vegas, NV (1 branch) |
|
|
|
Mesa, AZ (1 branch) |
|
|
|
San Diego, CA (2 branches) |
Legal Proceedings
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which Western
Alliance is a party or to which any of our properties are
subject. There are no material proceedings known to us to be
contemplated by any governmental authority. From time to time,
we are involved in a variety of litigation matters in the
ordinary course of our business and anticipate that we will
become involved in new litigation matters in the future.
Financial Information Regarding Segment Reporting
We currently operate our business in four operating segments:
BankWest of Nevada, Alliance Bank of Arizona, Torrey Pines Bank
and Other (Western Alliance, Miller/ Russell and Premier Trust).
Please refer to Note 18 Segment Information to
our Consolidated Financial Statements for financial information
regarding segment reporting.
76
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION OF WESTERN ALLIANCE
The following discussion is only intended to summarize
significant statutes and regulations that affect the banking
industry and therefore is not a comprehensive survey of the
field. These summaries are qualified in their entirety by
reference to the particular statute or regulation that is
referenced or described. Changes in applicable laws or
regulations or in the policies of banking supervisory agencies,
or the adoption of new laws or regulations, may have a material
effect on Western Alliances business and prospects.
Changes in fiscal or monetary policies also may affect Western
Alliance. The probability, timing, nature or extent of such
changes or their effect on Western Alliance cannot be predicted.
Bank Holding Company Regulation
General. Western Alliance Bancorporation is a bank
holding company and is registered with the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve) under
the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the BHC
Act). As such, the Federal Reserve is Western
Alliances primary federal regulator, and Western Alliance
is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination
by the Federal Reserve. Western Alliance must file reports with
the Federal Reserve and provide it with such additional
information as it may require.
Under Federal Reserve regulations, a bank holding company is
required to serve as a source of financial and managerial
strength for its subsidiary banks and may not conduct its
operations in an unsafe or unsound manner. In addition, it is
the Federal Reserves policy that, in serving as a source
of strength to its subsidiary banks, a bank holding company
should stand ready to use its available resources to provide
adequate capital to its subsidiary banks during period of
financial stress or adversity and should maintain the financial
flexibility and capital-raising capacity to obtain additional
resources for assisting its subsidiary banks. A bank holding
companys failure to meet these obligations will generally
be considered by the Federal Reserve to be an unsafe and unsound
banking practice or a violation of Federal Reserve regulations,
or both.
Among its powers, the Federal Reserve may require a bank holding
company to terminate an activity or terminate control of, divest
or liquidate subsidiaries or affiliates that the Federal Reserve
determines constitute a significant risk to the financial safety
or soundness of the bank holding company or any of its bank
subsidiaries. Subject to certain exceptions, bank holding
companies also are required to give written notice to and
receive approval from the Federal Reserve before purchasing or
redeeming their common stock or other equity securities. The
Federal Reserve also may regulate provisions of a bank holding
companys debt, including by imposing interest rate
ceilings and reserve requirements. In addition, the Federal
Reserve requires all bank holding companies to maintain capital
at or above certain prescribed levels.
Holding Company Bank Ownership. The BHC Act requires
every bank holding company to obtain the approval of the Federal
Reserve before it may acquire, directly or indirectly, ownership
or control of any voting shares of another bank or bank holding
company if, after such acquisition, it would own or control more
than 5% of any class of the outstanding voting shares of such
other bank or bank holding company, acquire all or substantially
all the assets of another bank or bank holding company, acquire
the power to exercise a controlling influence over the
management or policies of another bank or bank holding company
or to control the election of a majority of the directors (or
trustees, general partners or other similar functions) of
another bank or bank holding company, or merge or consolidate
with another bank holding company.
Holding Company Nonbank Ownership. With certain
exceptions, the BHC Act prohibits a bank holding company from
acquiring or retaining, directly or indirectly, ownership or
control of more than 5% of the outstanding voting shares of any
company that is not a bank or bank holding company, or from
engaging, directly or indirectly, in activities other than those
of banking, managing or controlling banks, or providing services
for its subsidiaries. The principal exceptions to these
prohibitions involve certain nonbank activities that have been
identified by statute or by Federal Reserve regulation or order
as activities so closely related to the business of banking or
of managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident
thereto. Business activities that have been determined to be so
related to banking include securities brokerage services,
investment advisory services, fiduciary services and certain
management advisory and data processing services, among others.
77
Change in Control. In the event that the BHC Act is not
applicable to a person or entity, the Change in Bank Control Act
of 1978 (CIBC Act) requires, that such person or
entity give notice to the Federal Reserve and the Federal
Reserve not disapprove such notice before such person or entity
may acquire control of a bank or bank holding
company. A limited number of exemptions apply to such
transactions. Control is conclusively presumed to exist if a
person or entity acquires 25% or more of the outstanding shares
of any class of voting stock of the bank holding company or
insured depository institution. Control is rebuttably presumed
to exist if a person or entity acquires 10% or more but less
than 25% of such voting stock and either the issuer has a class
of registered securities under Section 12 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
1934 Act), or no other person or entity will
own, control or hold the power to vote a greater percentage of
such voting stock immediately after the transaction.
State Law Restrictions. As a Nevada corporation, Western
Alliance is subject to certain limitations and restrictions
under applicable Nevada corporate law. For example, Nevada law
imposes restrictions relating to indemnification of directors,
maintenance of books, records and minutes and observance of
certain corporate formalities. Western Alliance also is a bank
holding company within the meaning of state law in the states
where its subsidiary banks are located. As such, it is subject
to examination by and may be required to file reports with the
Nevada Financial Institutions Division (Nevada FID)
under sections 666.095 and 666.105 of the Nevada Revised
Statutes. Western Alliance must obtain the approval of the
Nevada Commissioner of Financial Institutions (Nevada
Commissioner) before it may acquire a bank. Any transfer
of control of a Nevada bank holding company must be approved in
advance by the Nevada Commissioner.
Under section 6-142 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, no
person may acquire control of a company that controls an Arizona
bank without the prior approval of the Arizona Superintendent of
Financial Institutions (Arizona Superintendent). A
person who has the power to vote 15% or more of the voting
stock of a controlling company is presumed to control the
company.
Western Alliance also is subject to examination and reporting
requirements of the California Department of Financial
Institutions (California DFI) under sections 3703
and 3704 of the California Financial Code. Any transfer of
control of a corporation that controls a California bank
requires the prior approval of the California Commissioner of
Financial Institutions (California Commissioner).
Bank Regulation
General. Western Alliance controls three subsidiary
banks. BankWest of Nevada, located in Las Vegas, Nevada, is
chartered by the State of Nevada and is subject to primary
regulation, supervision and examination by the Nevada FID.
Alliance Bank, located in Phoenix, Arizona, is chartered by the
State of Arizona and is subject to primary regulation,
supervision and examination by the Arizona Department of
Financial Institutions. Torrey Pines Bank, located in
San Diego, California, is chartered by the State of
California and is subject to primary regulation, supervision and
examination by the California DFI. Each bank also is subject to
regulation by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC), which is its primary federal banking
supervisory authority, and, as to certain matters, the Federal
Reserve.
Federal and state banking laws and the implementing regulations
promulgated by the federal and state banking regulatory agencies
cover most aspects of the banks operations, including
capital requirements, reserve requirements against deposits and
for possible loan losses and other contingencies, dividends and
other distributions to shareholders, customers interests
in deposit accounts, payment of interest on certain deposits,
permissible activities and investments, securities that a bank
may issue and borrowings that a bank may incur, rate of growth,
number and location of branch offices and acquisition and merger
activity with other financial institutions.
Deposits in the banks are insured by the FDIC to applicable
limits through the Bank Insurance Fund. All of Western
Alliances subsidiary banks are required to pay deposit
insurance premiums, which are assessed semiannually and paid
quarterly. The premium amount is based upon a risk
classification system established by the FDIC. Banks with higher
levels of capital and a low degree of supervisory concern are
assessed lower premiums than banks with lower levels of capital
or a higher degree of supervisory concern. For the assessment
period ending June 30, 2005, Western Alliances
subsidiary banks are not required to pay any premium for
78
deposit insurance. The FDIC also is empowered to make special
assessments on insured depository institutions in amounts
determined by the FDIC to be necessary to give it adequate
income to repay amounts borrowed from the U.S. Treasury and
other sources or for any other purpose the FDIC deems necessary.
This assessment is not related to the condition of the banks
that are assessed. The assessment is adjusted quarterly. The
assessment for the first quarter of 2006 is $0.0132 per
$100 of FDIC-insured deposits.
If, as a result of an examination, the FDIC were to determine
that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality,
earnings prospects, management, liquidity or other aspects of
any of the banks operations had become unsatisfactory, or
that any of the banks or their management was in violation of
any law of regulation, the FDIC may take a number of different
remedial actions as it deems appropriate. These actions include
the power to enjoin unsafe or unsound practices, to
require affirmative actions to correct any conditions resulting
from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order
that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in the
banks capital, to restrict the banks growth, to
assess civil monetary penalties against the banks officers
or directors, to remove officers and directors and, if the FDIC
concludes that such conditions cannot be corrected or there is
an imminent risk of loss to depositors, to terminate the
banks deposit insurance.
Under Nevada, Arizona and California law, the respective state
banking supervisory authority has many of the same remedial
powers with respect to its state-chartered banks.
Change in Control. The application of the CIBC Act is
described in the discussion above regarding bank holding
companies. Under Nevada banking law, a Nevada bank must report a
change in ownership of 10% or more of the banks
outstanding voting stock to the Nevada FID within three business
days after obtaining knowledge of the change. Any person who
acquires control of a Nevada bank must obtain the prior approval
of the Nevada Commissioner. Arizona banking law provides that no
person may acquire control of an Arizona bank without the prior
approval of the Arizona Superintendent. A person who has the
power to vote 15% or more of the voting stock of an Arizona
bank is presumed to control the bank. California banking law
requires that any person must obtain the prior approval of the
California Commissioner before that person may acquire control
of a California bank. A person who has the power to
vote 10% or more of the voting stock of a California bank
is presumed to control the bank.
Bank Merger. Section 18(c) of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act (FDI Act) requires a bank or any other
insured depository institution to obtain the approval of its
primary federal banking supervisory authority before it may
merge or consolidate with or acquire the assets or assume the
liabilities of any other insured depository institution. State
law requirements are similar. Nevada banking law requires that a
bank must obtain the prior approval of the Nevada Commissioner
before it may merge or consolidate with or transfer its assets
and liabilities to another bank. Arizona banking law requires
the approval of the Arizona Superintendent before a bank may
merge or consolidate with another bank. Under California law, a
California bank that is the survivor of a merger must file an
application for approval with the California Commissioner.
Regulation of Nonbanking Subsidiaries
Premier Trust Inc. Premier Trust, Inc. is a trust company
chartered by the State of Nevada. Under Nevada law, a company
may not transact any trust business, with certain exceptions,
unless authorized by the Nevada Commissioner. The Nevada
Commissioner examines the books and records of registered trust
companies and may take possession of all the property and assets
of a trust company whose capital is impaired or is otherwise
determined to be unsafe and a danger to the public.
Miller/Russell & Associates, Inc. Miller/
Russell & Associates, Inc. is an Arizona corporation
and an investment adviser that is registered with the SEC under
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Advisers Act).
Under the Advisers Act, an investment adviser is subject to
supervision and inspection by the SEC. A significant element of
supervision under the Advisers Act is the requirement to make
significant disclosures to the public under Part II of
Form ADV of the advisers services and fees, the
qualifications of its associated persons, financial difficulties
and potential conflicts of interests. An investment adviser must
keep extensive books and records, including all customer
agreements, communications with clients, orders placed and
proprietary trading by the adviser or any advisory
representative.
79
Capital Standards
Regulatory Capital Guidelines. The Federal Reserve and
the FDIC have risk-based capital adequacy guidelines intended to
measure capital adequacy with regard to the degree of risk
associated with a banking organizations operations for
transactions reported on the balance sheet as assets and
transactions, such as letters of credit and recourse
arrangements, that are reported as off-balance-sheet items.
Under these guidelines, the nominal dollar amounts of assets on
the balance sheet and credit-equivalent amounts of
off-balance-sheet items are multiplied by one of several risk
adjustment percentages. These range from 0.0% for assets with
low credit risk, such as cash and certain U.S. government
securities, to 100.0% for assets with relatively higher credit
risk, such as business loans. A banking organizations
risk-based capital ratios are obtained by dividing its
Tier 1 capital and total qualifying capital (Tier 1
capital and a limited amount of Tier 2 capital) by its
total risk-adjusted assets and off-balance-sheet items.
Tier 1 capital consists of common stock, retained earnings,
noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and minority interests
in certain subsidiaries, less most other intangible assets.
Tier 2 capital may consist of a limited amount of the
allowance for loan and lease losses and certain other
instruments that have some characteristics of equity. The
inclusion of elements of Tier 2 capital as qualifying
capital is subject to certain other requirements and limitations
of the federal banking supervisory agencies. Since
December 31, 1992, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC have
required a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted
assets and off-balance-sheet items of 4.0% and a minimum ratio
of qualifying total capital to risk-adjusted assets and
off-balance-sheet items of 8.0%.
The Federal Reserve and the FDIC require banking organizations
to maintain a minimum amount of Tier 1 capital relative to
average total assets, referred to as the leverage ratio. The
principal objective of the leverage ratio is to constrain the
maximum degree to which a bank holding company may leverage its
equity capital base. For a banking organization rated in the
highest of the five categories used by regulators to rate
banking organizations, the minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1
capital to total assets is 3.0%. However, an institution with a
3.0% leverage ratio would be unlikely to receive the highest
rating since a strong capital position is a significant part of
the regulators rating criteria. All banking organizations
not rated in the highest category must maintain an additional
capital cushion of 100 to 200 basis points. The Federal
Reserve and the FDIC have the discretion to set higher minimum
capital requirements for specific institutions whose specific
circumstances warrant it, such as a bank or bank holding company
anticipating significant growth. A state-chartered bank that
does not achieve and maintain the required capital levels may be
issued a capital directive by the Federal Reserve or the FDIC,
as appropriate, to ensure the maintenance of required capital
levels. Neither the Federal Reserve nor the FDIC has advised
Western Alliance or any of its subsidiary banks that it is
subject to any special capital requirements.
Prompt Corrective Action. Federal banking agencies
possess broad powers to take corrective and other supervisory
action to resolve the problems of insured depository
institutions, including institutions that fall below one or more
of the prescribed minimum capital ratios described above. An
institution that is classified based upon its capital levels as
well-capitalized, adequately capitalized, or undercapitalized
may be treated as though it was in the next lower capital
category if its primary federal banking supervisory authority,
after notice and opportunity for hearing, determines that an
unsafe or unsound condition or practice warrants such treatment.
At each successively lower capital category, an insured
depository institution is subject to additional restrictions. A
bank holding company must guarantee that a subsidiary bank that
adopts a capital restoration plan will meet its plan
obligations, in an amount not to exceed 5% of the subsidiary
banks assets or the amount required to meet regulatory
capital requirements, whichever is less. Any capital loans made
by a bank holding company to a subsidiary bank are subordinated
to the claims of depositors in the bank and to certain other
indebtedness of the subsidiary bank. In the event of the
bankruptcy of a bank holding company, any commitment by the bank
holding company to a federal banking regulatory agency to
maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank would be assumed by
the bankruptcy trustee and would be entitled to priority of
payment.
In addition to measures that may be taken under the prompt
corrective action provisions, federal banking regulatory
authorities may bring enforcement actions against banks and bank
holding companies for unsafe or unsound practices in the conduct
of their businesses or for violations of any law, rule or
regulation, any condition imposed in writing by the appropriate
federal banking regulatory authority or any written agreement
with the authority. Possible enforcement actions include the
appointment of a conservator or receiver, the
80
issuance of a cease-and-desist order that could be judicially
enforced, the termination of insurance of deposits (in the case
of a depository institution), the imposition of civil money
penalties, the issuance of directives to increase capital, the
issuance of formal and informal agreements, the issuance of
removal and prohibition orders against institution-affiliated
parties and the enforcement of such actions through injunctions
or restraining orders. In addition, a bank holding
companys inability to serve as a source of strength for
its subsidiary banks could serve as an additional basis for a
regulatory action against the bank holding company.
Under Nevada law, if the stockholders equity of a Nevada
state-chartered bank becomes impaired, the Nevada Commissioner
must require the bank to make the impairment good within three
months after receiving notice from the Nevada Commissioner. If
the impairment is not made good, the Nevada Commissioner may
take possession of the bank and liquidate it.
Dividends. Western Alliance has never declared or paid
cash dividends on its capital stock. Western Alliance currently
intends to retain any future earnings for future growth and does
not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable
future. Any determination in the future to pay dividends will be
at the discretion of Western Alliances board of directors
and will depend on the companys earnings, financial
condition, results of operations, business prospects, capital
requirements, regulatory restrictions, contractual restrictions
and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant.
Western Alliances ability to pay dividends is subject to
the regulatory authority of the Federal Reserve. Although there
are no specific federal law or regulations restricting dividend
payments by bank holding companies, the supervisory concern of
the Federal Reserve focuses on a holding companys capital
position, its ability to meet its financial obligations as they
come due, and its capacity to act as a source of financial
strength to its subsidiaries. In addition, Federal Reserve
policy discourages the payment of dividends by a bank holding
company that are not supported by current operating earnings.
As a bank holding company registered with the State of Nevada,
Western Alliance also is subject to limitations under Nevada law
on the payment of dividends. Nevada banking law imposes no
restrictions on bank holding companies regarding the payment of
dividends. Under Nevada corporate law, section 78-288 of
the Nevada Revised Statutes provides that no cash dividend or
other distribution to shareholders, other than a stock dividend,
may be made if, after giving effect to the dividend, the
corporation would not be able to pay its debts as they become
due or, unless specifically allowed by the articles of
incorporation, the corporations total assets would be less
than the sum of its total liabilities and the claims of
preferred stockholders upon dissolution of the corporation.
From time to time, Western Alliance may become a party to
financing agreements and other contractual obligations that have
the effect of limiting or prohibiting the declaration or payment
of dividends. Holding company expenses and obligations with
respect to its outstanding trust preferred securities and
corresponding subordinated debt also may limit or impair Western
Alliances ability to declare and pay dividends.
Since Western Alliance has no significant assets other than the
voting stock of its subsidiaries, it currently depends on
dividends from its bank subsidiaries and, to a much lesser
extent, its nonbank subsidiaries, for a substantial portion of
its revenue. The ability of a state nonmember bank to pay cash
dividends is not restricted by federal law or regulations. State
law imposes restrictions on the ability of each of Western
Alliances subsidiary banks to pay dividends:
|
|
|
|
|
Under sections 661.235 and 661.240 of the Nevada Revised
Statutes, BankWest of Nevada may not pay dividends unless the
banks surplus fund, not including any initial surplus
fund, equals the banks initial stockholders equity,
including 10% of the previous years net profits, and the
dividend would not reduce the banks stockholders
equity below the initial stockholders equity of the bank
or 6% of the total deposit liability of the bank. |
|
|
|
Under section 6-187 of the Arizona Revised Statutes,
Alliance may pay dividends on the same basis as any other
Arizona corporation. Under section 10-640 of the Arizona
Revised Statutes, a corporation may not make a distribution to
shareholders if to do so would render the corporation insolvent
or unable to pay its debts as they become due. However, an
Arizona bank may not declare a non-stock dividend out of capital
surplus without the approval of the Arizona Superintendent. |
81
|
|
|
|
|
Under section 642 of the California Financial Code, Torrey
Pines Bank may not, without the prior approval of the California
Commissioner, make a distribution to its shareholders in an
amount exceeding the banks retained earnings or its net
income, whichever is less, during its last three fiscal years,
less any previous distributions made during that period by the
bank or by any majority-owned subsidiary of the bank. Under
section 643 of the California Financial Code, the
California Commissioner may approve a larger distribution, but
in no event to exceed the banks net income during the
year, net income during the prior fiscal year or retained
earnings, whichever is greatest. |
As of September 30, 2005, BankWest of Nevada, Alliance
Bank, and Torrey Pines Bank had the unrestricted ability to pay
dividends in an aggregate amount of approximately
$28.8 million.
Redemption. A bank holding company may not purchase or
redeem its equity securities without the prior written approval
of the Federal Reserve if the purchase or redemption combined
with all other purchases and redemptions by the bank holding
company during the preceding 12 months equals or exceeds
10% of the bank holding companys consolidated net worth.
However, prior approval is not required if the bank holding
company is well-managed, not the subject of any unresolved
supervisory issues and both immediately before and after the
purchase or redemption is well-capitalized.
Increasing Competition in Financial Services
Interstate Banking And Branching. The Riegle-Neal
Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994
(Riegle-Neal Act) generally authorizes interstate
branching. Currently, bank holding companies may purchase banks
in any state, and banks may merge with banks in other states,
unless the home state of the bank holding company or either
merging bank has opted out under the legislation. After properly
entering a state, an
out-of-state bank may
establish de novo branches or acquire branches or acquire other
banks on the same terms as a bank that is chartered by the state.
Nevada has enacted legislation authorizing interstate mergers
pursuant to the Riegle-Neal Act. The Nevada statute permits
out-of-state banks and
bank holding companies meeting certain requirements to maintain
and operate the Nevada branches of a Nevada bank that are
acquired in an interstate combination. An
out-of-state bank may
not enter the state by establishing a de novo branch or
acquiring a branch of a depository institution in Nevada without
acquiring the institution itself or its charter. However, with
the written approval of the Nevada Commissioner, such an
out-of-state bank or
bank holding company may engage in such a transaction in a
county with a population less than 100,000.
An out-of-state bank
may enter Arizona by establishing a de novo branch or by
acquiring a single branch of a financial institution that is
headquartered in the state, provided that the branch is more
than five years old and the state in which the
out-of-state bank is
headquartered extends reciprocal rights. An
out-of-state bank
holding company without a subsidiary bank in Arizona may
establish a de novo bank in the state, and thereafter may
acquire additional banks.
An out-of-state bank
may not enter California by establishing a de novo branch or
acquiring a branch of a depository institution in California
unless it merges with a California bank or acquires the whole
business unit of a California bank. An
out-of-state bank
holding company without a subsidiary bank in California may
establish a de novo bank in the state, and thereafter may
acquire additional banks.
Financial Holding Company Status. The Financial Services
Modernization Act of 1999, also known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act (GLB Act), was enacted in order to establish a
comprehensive framework to permit affiliations among commercial
banks, insurance companies, securities and investment banking
firms and other financial service providers. The GLB Act revised
the BHC Act to permit a qualifying bank holding company to
engage in a broader range of financial activities, primarily
through wholly owned subsidiaries, and thereby to foster greater
competition among financial service companies. The GLB Act also
contains provision that expressly preempt any state law
restricting the establishment of financial affiliations,
primarily with regard to insurance activities. The GLB Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Broadens the activities that may be conducted by bank holding
companies and their subsidiaries and by national banks through
financial subsidiaries. Under parity provisions of the FDI Act
and FDIC |
82
|
|
|
|
|
regulations, as well as state banking laws and regulations,
insured state banks may engage in activities that are
permissible for national banks, thereby extending the effect of
the GLB Act to state banks as well; |
|
|
|
Provides a framework for protecting the privacy of consumer
information; |
|
|
|
Modifies the laws governing the implementation of the Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA); and |
|
|
|
Addresses a variety of other legal and regulatory issues
affecting both
day-to-day operations
and long-term activities of financial institutions. |
In order to become or remain a financial holding company, a bank
holding company must be well-capitalized, well-managed, and,
except in limited circumstances, rated satisfactory
or better for performance under the CRA. Failure by a financial
holding company to maintain compliance with these requirements
or correct non-compliance within a fixed time period could lead
to the divesture of all subsidiary banks or a requirement to
conform all nonbanking activities to those permissible for a
bank holding company. A bank holding company that is not also a
financial holding company can only engage in banking and such
other activities that were determined by the Federal Reserve to
be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling
banks as to be a proper incident thereto at the time that the
GLB Act was adopted by Congress.
A bank holding company that qualifies and elects to become a
financial holding company may affiliate with securities firms
and insurance companies and engage in investment banking and
other activities that are financial in nature or are incidental
or complementary to activities that are financial in nature.
Under the regulations of the Federal Reserve implementing the
GLB Act, activities that are financial in nature and may be
engaged in by financial holding companies include securities
underwriting, dealing and market making, sponsoring mutual funds
and investment companies, engaging in insurance underwriting and
brokerage activities, investing (without providing routine
management) in companies engaged in nonfinancial activities and
conducting activities that the Federal Reserve, in consultation
with the Secretary of the Treasury, determines from time to time
to be financial in nature or incidental to a financial activity.
Western Alliance does not believe that the GLB Act will have a
material effect on its operations, at least in the near-term.
Western Alliance is not a financial holding company and has no
current plans to engage in any activities not permitted to
traditional bank holding companies. However, to the extent that
the GLB Act enables banks, securities firms and insurance
companies to affiliate, the financial service industry may
experience further consolidation. The GLB Act also may
contribute to an increase in the level of competition that
Western Alliance faces from larger institutions and other types
of companies offering diversified financial products, many of
which may have substantially greater financial resources than
Western Alliance has.
Selected Regulation of Banking Activities
Transactions with Affiliates. Transactions between banks
and their affiliates are governed by sections 23A and 23B of the
Federal Reserve Act (FRA) and Federal Reserve
regulations thereunder. Generally, sections 23A and 23B are
intended to protect banks from suffering losses arising from
transactions with non-insured affiliates, by limiting the extent
to which a bank or its subsidiaries may engage in covered
transactions with any one affiliate and with all affiliates of
the bank in the aggregate, and by requiring that such
transactions be on terms that are consistent with safe and sound
banking practices. Sections 23A and 23B also regulate
transactions by a bank with financial subsidiaries that it may
operate as a result of the expanded authority granted under the
GLB Act. Covered transactions include extensions of credit to
affiliates, investments in securities issued by affiliates and
the use of affiliates securities as collateral for loans
to any non-affiliated borrower. These laws and regulations may
limit the ability of Western Alliance to obtain funds from its
subsidiary banks for its cash needs, including funds for payment
of dividends, interest and operational expenses.
Insider Credit Transactions. Banks also are subject to
certain restrictions under the FRA and Federal Reserve
regulations that implement it regarding extensions of credit to
executive officers, directors or principal shareholders of a
bank and its affiliates or to any related interests of such
persons (i.e., insiders). All extensions of credit to insiders
must be made on substantially the same terms and pursuant to the
same credit
83
underwriting procedures as are applicable to comparable
transactions with persons who are neither insiders nor
employees, and must not involve more than the normal risk of
repayment or present other unfavorable features. Insider loans
also are subject to certain lending limits, restrictions on
overdrafts to insiders and requirements for prior approval by
the banks board of directors.
Lending Limits. State banking law generally limits the
amount of funds that a bank may lend to a single borrower. Under
Nevada law, the total amount of outstanding loans that a bank
may make to a single borrower generally may not exceed 25% of
stockholders equity. Under Arizona law, the obligations of
one borrower to a bank may not exceed 15% of the banks
capital. Under California law, the obligations of any one
borrower to a bank generally may not exceed 25% of the sum of
the banks shareholders equity, allowance for loan
losses, capital notes and debentures.
Tying Arrangements. Western Alliance and its subsidiary
banks are prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements
in connection with any extension of credit, sale or lease of
property or furnishing of services. With certain exceptions for
traditional banking services, Western Alliances subsidiary
banks may not condition an extension of credit to a customer on
a requirement that the customer obtain additional credit,
property or services from the bank, Western Alliance or any of
Western Alliances other subsidiaries, that the customer
provide some additional credit, property or services to the
bank, Western Alliance or any of Western Alliances other
subsidiaries or that the customer refrain from obtaining credit,
property or other services from a competitor.
Regulation of Management. Federal law sets forth
circumstances under which officers or directors of a bank or
bank holding company may be removed by the institutions
primary federal banking supervisory authority. Federal law also
prohibits a management official of a bank or bank holding
company from serving as a management official with an
unaffiliated bank or bank holding company that has offices
within a specified geographic area that is related to the
location of the banks offices and the asset size of the
institutions.
Safety and Soundness Standards. Federal law imposes upon
banks certain non-capital safety and soundness standards. These
standards cover internal controls, information systems, internal
audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest
rate exposure, asset growth, compensation and benefits.
Additional standards apply to asset quality, earnings and stock
valuation. An institution that fails to meet these standards
must develop a plan, acceptable to its regulators, specifying
the steps that the institution will take to meet the standards.
Failure to submit or implement such a plan may subject the
institution to regulatory sanctions.
Consumer Protection Laws and Regulations
The banking regulatory authorities are have increased their
attention in recent years to compliance with consumer protection
laws and their implementing regulations. Examination and
enforcement have become more intense in nature, and insured
institutions have been advised to monitor carefully compliance
with such laws and regulations. The bank is subject to many
federal consumer protection statutes and regulations, some of
which are discussed below.
Community Reinvestment Act. The CRA is intended to
encourage insured depository institutions, while operating
safely and soundly, to help meet the credit needs of their
communities. The CRA specifically directs the federal regulatory
agencies, when examining insured depository institutions, to
assess a banks record of helping meet the credit needs of
its entire community, including low- and moderate-income
neighborhoods, consistent with safe and sound banking practices.
The CRA further requires the agencies to take a financial
institutions record of meeting its community credit needs
into account when evaluating applications for, among other
things, domestic branches, mergers or acquisitions, or holding
company formations. The agencies use the CRA assessment factors
in order to provide a rating to the financial institution. The
ratings range from a high of outstanding to a low of
substantial noncompliance. BankWest of Nevada was
rated outstanding in its last examination for CRA
performance, as of March 2004. Alliance was rated
satisfactory in its last examination for CRA
performance, as of November 2004. Torrey Pines Bank has not yet
been examined for CRA performance and does not have a rating.
84
Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Equal Credit
Opportunity Act generally prohibits discrimination in any credit
transaction, whether for consumer or business purposes, on the
basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital
status, age (except in limited circumstances), receipt of income
from public assistance programs, or good faith exercise of any
rights under the Consumer Credit Protection Act.
Truth in Lending Act. The Truth in Lending Act
(TILA) is designed to ensure that credit terms are
disclosed in a meaningful way so that consumers may compare
credit terms more readily and knowledgeably. As a result of
TILA, all creditors must use the same credit terminology to
express rates and payments, including the annual percentage
rate, the finance charge, the amount financed, the total of
payments and the payment schedule, among other things.
Fair Housing Act. The Fair Housing Act (FHA)
regulates many practices, and makes it unlawful for any lender
to discriminate in its housing-related lending activities
against any person because of race, color, religion, national
origin, sex, handicap or familial status. A number of lending
practices have been found by the courts to be illegal under the
FHA, including some practices that are not specifically
mentioned in the FHA.
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. The Home Mortgage
Disclosure Act (HMDA) grew out of public concern
over credit shortages in certain urban neighborhoods and
provides public information that is intended to help to show
whether financial institutions are serving the housing credit
needs of the neighborhoods and communities in which they are
located. The HMDA also includes a fair lending
aspect that requires the collection and disclosure of data about
applicant and borrower characteristics as a way of identifying
possible discriminatory lending patterns and enforcing
anti-discrimination statutes. Beginning in March 2005, home
mortgage lenders, including banks, were required under the HMDA
to make available to the public expanded information regarding
the pricing of home mortgage loans, including the rate
spread between the interest rate on loans and certain
Treasury securities and other benchmarks. The availability of
this information has led to increased scrutiny of higher-priced
loans at all financial institutions to detect illegal
discriminatory practices and to the initiation of a limited
number of investigations by federal banking agencies and the
U.S. Department of Justice.
Real Estate Settlement Practices Act. The Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) requires lenders
to provide borrowers with disclosures regarding the nature and
cost of real estate settlements. RESPA also prohibits certain
abusive practices, such as kickbacks and fee-splitting without
providing settlement services.
Penalties under the above laws may include fines, reimbursements
and other penalties. Due to heightened regulatory concern
related to compliance with these laws generally, the Western
Alliance and its subsidiary banks may incur additional
compliance costs or be required to expend additional funds for
investments in its local community.
Predatory Lending
Predatory lending is a far-reaching concept and
potentially covers a broad range of behavior. As such, it does
not lend itself to a concise or comprehensive definition.
However, predatory lending typically involves one or more of the
following elements:
|
|
|
|
|
making unaffordable loans based on the borrowers assets
rather than the borrowers ability to repay an obligation; |
|
|
|
inducing a borrower to refinance a loan repeatedly in order to
charge high points and fees each time the loan is refinanced, or
loan flipping; and |
|
|
|
engaging in fraud or deception to conceal the true nature of the
loan obligation from an unsuspecting or unsophisticated borrower. |
The Home Ownership Equity and Protection Act of 1994
(HOEPA) and regulations adopted by the Federal
Reserve to implement it require extra disclosures and extend
additional protection to borrowers in consumer credit
transactions, such as home repairs or renovation, that is
secured by a mortgage on the
85
borrowers primary residence. The HOEPA disclosures and
protections are applicable to consumer loans with any of the
following features:
|
|
|
|
|
interest rates for first lien mortgage loans more than
8 percentage points above the yield on U.S. Treasury
securities having a comparable maturity; |
|
|
|
interest rates for subordinate lien mortgage loans more than
10 percentage points above the yield on U.S. Treasury
securities having a comparable maturity; or |
|
|
|
fees, such as optional insurance and similar debt protection
costs paid in connection with the credit transaction that, when
combined with points and fees, are deemed to be excessive. |
HOEPA also prohibits loan flipping by the same lender or loan
servicer within a year of the loan being refinanced. Lenders are
presumed to have violated the law unless they document that the
borrower has the ability to repay. Lenders that violate the
rules face cancellation of loans and penalties equal to the
finance charges paid.
Privacy
Under the GLB Act, all financial institutions, including Western
Alliance, its bank subsidiaries and certain of their nonbanking
affiliates and subsidiaries are required to establish policies
and procedures to restrict the sharing of nonpublic customer
data with nonaffiliated parties at the customers request
and to protect customer data from unauthorized access. In
addition, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003
(FACT Act) includes many provisions concerning
national credit reporting standards and permits consumers,
including customers of Western Alliances subsidiary banks,
to opt out of information-sharing for marketing purposes among
affiliated companies. The FACT Act also requires banks and other
financial institutions to notify their customers if they report
negative information about them to a credit bureau or if they
are granted credit on terms less favorable than those generally
available. The Federal Reserve and the Federal Trade Commission
have extensive rulemaking authority under the FACT Act, and
Western Alliance and its subsidiary banks are subject to these
provisions. Western Alliance has developed policies and
procedures for itself and its subsidiaries to maintain
compliance and believes it is in compliance with all privacy,
information sharing and notification provisions of the GLB Act
and the FACT Act.
Under California law, every business that owns or licenses
personal information about a California resident must maintain
reasonable security procedures and policies to protect that
information. All customer records that contain personal
information and that are longer to be retained must be
destroyed. Any person that conducts business in California,
maintains customers personal information in unencrypted
computer records and experiences a breach of security with
regard to those records must promptly disclose the breach to all
California residents whose personal information was or is
reasonably believed to have been acquired by unauthorized
persons as a result of such breach. Any person who maintains
computerized personal data for others and experiences a breach
of security must promptly inform the owner or licensee of the
breach. A business may not provide personal information of its
customers to third parties for direct mailing purposes unless
the customer opts in to such information sharing. A
business that fails to provide this privilege to its customers
must report the uses made of its customers data upon a
customers request.
Compliance
In order to assure that Western Alliance and its subsidiary
banks are in compliance with the laws and regulations that apply
to their operations, including those summarized below, Western
Alliance and each of its subsidiary banks employs a compliance
officer and Western Alliance engages an independent compliance
auditing firm. Western Alliance is regularly reviewed by the
Federal Reserve and the subsidiary banks are regularly reviewed
by the FDIC and their respective state banking agencies, as part
of which their compliance with applicable laws and regulations
is assessed. Based on the assessments of its outside compliance
auditors and state and federal banking supervisory authorities
of Western Alliance and its subsidiary banks, Western Alliance
believes that it materially complies with all the laws and
regulations that apply to its operations.
86
Corporate Governance and Accounting Legislation
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
(SOX) was adopted for the stated purpose to increase
corporate responsibility, enhance penalties for accounting and
auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies, and protect
investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate
disclosures pursuant to the securities laws. SOX is the most
far-reaching U.S. securities legislation enacted in several
years. It applies generally to all companies that file or are
required to file periodic reports with the SEC under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act),
which includes Western Alliance. SOX includes very specific
additional disclosure requirements and new corporate governance
rules, requires the SEC and securities exchanges to adopt
extensive additional disclosure, corporate governance and other
related rules and mandates further studies of certain issues by
the SEC and the Comptroller General. Among its provisions, SOX
subjects bonuses issued to top executives to disgorgement if a
subsequent restatement of a companys financial statements
was due to corporate misconduct, prohibits an officer or
director from misleading or coercing an auditor, prohibits
insider trades during pension fund blackout periods,
imposes new criminal penalties for fraud and other wrongful acts
and extends the period during which certain securities fraud
lawsuits can be brought against a company or its officers.
SOX represents significant federal involvement in matters
traditionally left to state regulatory systems, such as the
regulation of the accounting profession, and to state corporate
law, such as the relationship between a board of directors and
management and between a board of directors and its committees.
The SEC has been delegated the task of enacting rules to
implement various provisions with respect to, among other
matters, disclosure in periodic filings pursuant to the Exchange
Act. In addition, the federal banking regulatory authorities
have adopted requirements concerning the certification of
financial statements by bank officials that are generally
similar to requirements under SOX.
Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Legislation
Congress enacted the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 (the
BSA) to require financial institutions, including
Western Alliance and its subsidiary banks, to maintain certain
records and to report certain transactions to prevent such
institutions from being used to hide or transfer money derived
from criminal activity and tax evasion. The BSA establishes,
among other things, (a) record keeping requirements to
assist government enforcement agencies in tracing financial
transactions and flow of funds; (b) reporting requirements
for Suspicious Activity Reports and Currency Transaction
Reports) to assist government enforcement agencies in detecting
patterns of criminal activity; (c) enforcement provisions
authorizing criminal and civil penalties for illegal activities
and violations of the BSA and its implementing regulations; and
(d) safe harbor provisions that protect financial
institutions from civil liability for their cooperative efforts.
Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act (the USA PATRIOT
Act) amended the BSA and incorporates anti-terrorist
financing provisions into the requirements of the BSA and its
implementing regulations. Among other things, the USA PATRIOT
Act requires all financial institutions, including Western
Alliance, its subsidiary banks and several of their nonbanking
affiliates and subsidiaries, to institute and maintain a
risk-based anti-money laundering compliance program that
includes a customer identification program, provides for
information sharing with law enforcement and between certain
financial institutions by means of an exemption from the privacy
provisions of the GLB Act, prohibits U.S. banks and
broker-dealers from maintaining accounts with foreign
shell banks, establishes due diligence and enhanced
due diligence requirements for certain foreign correspondent
banking and foreign private banking accounts and imposes
additional record keeping requirements for certain correspondent
banking arrangements. The USA PATRIOT Act also grants broad
authority to the Secretary of the Treasury to take actions to
combat money laundering, and federal bank regulators are
required to evaluate the effectiveness of an applicant in
combating money laundering in determining whether to approve any
application submitted by a financial institution. Western
Alliance and its affiliates have adopted policies, procedures
and controls to comply with the BSA and the USA PATRIOT Act, and
they engage in very few transactions of any kind with foreign
financial institutions or foreign persons.
87
The Department of the Treasurys Office of Foreign Asset
Control (OFAC) administers and enforces economic and
trade sanctions against targeted foreign countries, entities and
individuals based on U.S. foreign policy and national
security goals. As a result, financial institutions, including
Western Alliance, its subsidiary banks and several of their
nonbanking affiliates and subsidiaries, must scrutinize
transactions to ensure that they do not represent obligations
of, or ownership interests in, entities owned or controlled by
sanctioned targets. In addition, Western Alliance, its
subsidiary banks and several of their nonbanking affiliates and
subsidiaries restrict transactions with certain targeted
countries except as permitted by OFAC.
88
MANAGEMENT OF WESTERN ALLIANCE
Executive Officers and Directors
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2005,
information concerning the individuals who are and will remain
Western Alliance executive officers and directors upon
completion of the merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position with Western Alliance Bancorporation |
|
|
| |
|
|
Robert Sarver
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Gary Cady
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, California Administration |
Duane Froeschle
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer |
Dale Gibbons
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
James Lundy
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Arizona Administration |
Linda Mahan
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Operations |
Merrill Wall
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer |
Larry L. Woodrum
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Nevada Administration and Director |
Paul Baker
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Director |
Bruce Beach
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Director |
William S. Boyd
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
Director |
Steven J. Hilton
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Director |
Marianne Boyd Johnson
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Director |
Cary Mack
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Director |
Arthur Marshall
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
Director |
Todd Marshall
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Director |
M. Nafees Nagy, M.D.
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
Director |
James E. Nave, D.V.M.
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Director |
Edward Nigro
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Director |
Donald D. Snyder
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Director |
Paul Baker has been a director of Western Alliance and
Alliance Bank of Arizona since December 2002 and February 2003,
respectively. Mr. Baker has been a prominent Tucson
businessman for the last 30 years. Mr. Baker has been
the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Enterprise
Group, Inc. since 1998. Mr. Baker was also the founder of
Arizona Mail Order Company, a direct-marketer of womens
clothing. Arizona Mail Order Company was later sold to
Fingerhut. Mr. Baker served as a director of Grossmont Bank
from 1995 to 1998.
Bruce Beach has been a director of Western Alliance since
April 2005. Mr. Beach has been a director of Alliance Bank
of Arizona since its formation. Mr. Beach has been Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of Beach, Fleischman &
Co., P.C., an accounting and business advisory firm in
Southern Arizona, since May 1991. Mr. Beach is a certified
public accountant, received a BS in business administration and
an MBA from the University of Arizona, and has 31 years of
experience in public accounting. Mr. Beach also has been the
89
Vice-Chairman of Carondelet Health Network, one of the largest
hospital systems in Southern Arizona, since July 2004 and has
served as the chairman of its audit committee since July 2003.
William S. Boyd has been a director and principal
shareholder of Western Alliance since inception and was a
founder of its first bank, BankWest of Nevada. Mr. Boyd has
served as a director of Boyd Gaming Corporation since its
inception in June 1988 and as Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer since August 1998. He served as a director of
Nevada State Bank from 1965 to 1985. Mr. Boyd played a
leading role in founding the William S. Boyd School of Law at
the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Mr. Boyd is the father
of director Marianne Boyd Johnson.
Gary Cady has been the Executive Vice President of
California Administration and President of Torrey Pines Bank
since May 2003. Mr. Cady was also a director of Western
Alliance from June 2003 to April 2005. Mr. Cady has
28 years of commercial banking experience, most recently as
Senior Vice President and Regional Manager for California Bank
and Trust in San Diego from August 1987 to February 2003.
Mr. Cady is a director of Grossmont Hospital Corporation
and a board member of the San Diego East County Regional
Chamber of Commerce.
Duane Froeschle has been the Chief Credit Officer and an
Executive Vice President of Western Alliance and Vice Chairman
and Chief Credit Officer of Alliance Bank of Arizona since
February 2003. Mr. Froeschle has 30 years of
experience in commercial banking. Prior to joining Western
Alliance, Mr. Froeschle held various positions with
National Bank of Arizona from June 1987 to June 2002, including
Chief Credit Officer from June 1997 to December 2001.
Dale Gibbons has been the Chief Financial Officer and an
Executive Vice President of Western Alliance and BankWest of
Nevada since May 2003 and July 2004, respectively. He also has
been a director of Premier Trust, Inc. since December 2003 and
Miller/ Russell & Associates since May 2004.
Mr. Gibbons has 24 years of experience in commercial
banking, including serving as Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Board of Zions Bancorporation from August 1996
to June 2001. In June 2001, Mr. Gibbons resigned from Zions
following his arrest related to certain criminal charges. From
June 2001 until his acquittal in June 2002, Mr. Gibbons was
actively involved in his defense, and from June 2002 to May
2003, Mr. Gibbons was actively seeking suitable employment
and engaged in various consulting projects, including with
Western Alliance. From 1979 to 1996, Mr. Gibbons worked for
First Interstate Bancorp in a variety of retail banking and
financial management positions.
Steven J. Hilton has been a director of Western Alliance
and Alliance Bank of Arizona since December 2002 and February
2003, respectively. Mr. Hilton was the co-founder, and is
the Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Meritage Homes
Corporation. Mr. Hilton founded Arizona-based Monterey
Homes in 1985. Under Mr. Hiltons leadership, Monterey
became a publicly traded company and combined with Legacy Homes
in 1997, resulting in the creation of Meritage Homes
Corporation. Mr. Hilton received his Bachelor of Science
degree in accounting from the University of Arizona.
Marianne Boyd Johnson has served as a founding director
of Western Alliance and BankWest of Nevada since their
establishment in 1995 and 1994, respectively. Since 1992,
Ms. Johnson has been a member of the Board of Directors of
Boyd Gaming Corporation and has served as its Vice Chairman of
the Board and Senior Vice President since February 2001 and
December 2001, respectively. Ms. Johnson has served Boyd
Gaming since 1977 in a variety of capacities, including sales
and marketing. Ms. Johnson served as a Director of Nevada
Community Bank until its sale to First Security Bank (Wells
Fargo) in 1993. Ms. Johnson is the daughter of director
William S. Boyd.
James Lundy has been the Executive Vice President of
Arizona Administration and President and Chief Executive Officer
of Alliance Bank of Arizona since February 2003. Mr. Lundy
was also a director of Western Alliance from February 2003 to
March 2005. From June 1991 to June 2002, Mr. Lundy served
as Senior Vice President and Executive Vice President of
National Bank of Arizona, and from December 2000 to June 2002,
as Vice Chairman of National Bank of Arizona. Most recently,
Mr. Lundy oversaw National Bank of Arizonas
commercial banking function on a statewide basis, with direct
responsibility for over $1 billion in
90
commercial loan commitments, executive oversight of marketing
and overall supervision of approximately 100 employees
involved in commercial banking and marketing throughout Arizona.
Cary Mack has been a director of Western Alliance since
April 2005. Mr. Mack has been a director of Torrey Pines
Bank since its formation in May 2003. Mr. Mack is licensed
in the State of California as a certified public accountant,
attorney and real estate broker. He was formerly employed with
PricewaterhouseCoopers audit and dispute resolution
practices until 1990, when he became a founding shareholder, and
the chief executive officer of Mack.Barclay Inc., a forensic
certified public accounting, economic and information technology
consulting firm specializing in the evaluation and resolution of
complex economic and accounting issues in the business and
litigation environments.
Linda Mahan has been the Executive Vice
President Operations for Western Alliance since July
2004. In this capacity, Ms. Mahan oversees centralized
operations and technology. From 1994 to July 2004,
Ms. Mahan was Chief Financial Officer of BankWest of
Nevada. Ms. Mahan was controller of Sun State Bank, Las
Vegas, Nevada from 1982 until 1994. Her responsibilities at Sun
State included accounting, human resources, and bank operations
for six branches. Ms. Mahan recently graduated from the
Pacific Coast Banking School. She has been in banking since 1974.
Arthur Marshall has been a director of Western Alliance
since 1995 and the Chairman of the Board of BankWest of Nevada
since its establishment in 1994. He served as Chairman of the
Board of Directors of Western Alliance until December 2002. He
was a co-founder of Marshall Rousso, now Marshall Retail Group,
or MRG, a privately owned retail apparel chain in the Western
United States and served as its President from 1959 to 1988. He
is a member of the Nevada Gaming Commission and the national
commission of the Anti-Defamation League and a former board
member of the Public Employees Retirement System of Nevada. He
is a recipient of the Prime Ministers award from the State
of Israel. Mr. Marshall is the father of director Todd
Marshall.
Todd Marshall was a founding director of BankWest of
Nevada and Western Alliance and has served as a director
continuously since their establishment in 1994 and 1995,
respectively. Mr. Marshall has been the Chief Executive
Officer of MRG since May 1976. Mr. Marshall is the son of
director Arthur Marshall.
M. Nafees Nagy, M.D. has served as a director
of BankWest of Nevada since its establishment in 1994 and as a
director of Western Alliance since April 2004. Dr. Nagy has
practiced medicine in Las Vegas for more than 30 years and
specializes in oncology, clinical hematology, and cancer
chemotherapy. He founded and is President and a director of the
Nevada Cancer Center. Dr. Nagy served for eight years as a
member of the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners.
Dr. Nagy is certified by the American Board of Internal
Medicine and the American Board of Utilization Review and
Quality Assurance and has consulted for several healthcare
concerns. He currently is a member of the advisory board for
Option Care. Dr. Nagy formerly served as a director of Sun
Bank for five years and Nevada Community Bank until its sale in
1993. He retired from the U.S. Army as a Lt. Colonel and
served in Operation Desert Storm in 1991.
James E. Nave, D.V.M. has served as a director of Western
Alliance and BankWest of Nevada since their establishment in
1995 and 1994, respectively. Dr. Nave, a former officer in
the armed forces, has owned the Tropicana Animal Hospital since
1974. He is a former President of the American Veterinary
Association. Dr. Nave is also the Globalization Liaison
Agent for Education and Licensing for the American Veterinary
Medical Association and Chairperson of the National Commission
for Veterinary Economics Issues. He is also a member of the
Nevada Veterinary Medical Association, the Clark County
Veterinary Medical Association, the National Academy of
Practitioners, the Western Veterinary Conference, the American
Animal Hospital Association, the Executive Board of the World
Veterinary Association and was the chairman of the University of
Missouri, College of Veterinary Medicine Development Committee.
He was also a member of the Nevada State Athletic Commission
from 1988 to 1999 and served as its chairman from 1989 to 1992
and from 1994 to 1996. Dr. Nave is also a director of
Station Casinos, Inc., and is chairman of its audit committee
and a member of its governance and compensation committee.
Edward M. Nigro has served as a director of Western
Alliance and BankWest of Nevada since their establishment in
1995 and 1994, respectively. Mr. Nigro is actively engaged
in the development, ownership
91
and operation of commercial and residential real estate projects
in the Las Vegas area. From 1971 to 1979, Mr. Nigro held
numerous senior management positions with Del E. Webb
Corporation, including chief operations officer and director,
Nevada operations. From 1993 until its sale in 1996, he was
principal shareholder, chief executive officer and director of
Prime Holdings, Inc., a health delivery concern located in
Nevada. Mr. Nigro has also been active in numerous
philanthropic organizations and is a graduate of Holy Cross
College. Mr. Nigro served as a Commissioned Officer with
the U.S. Air Force, where he was awarded the Air Medal for
Combat Missions in Vietnam, two commendation medals for
Meritorious Service, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, and other
medals and awards.
Robert G. Sarver has been the President, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of Western Alliance since December 2002.
Mr. Sarver has also served as the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Torrey Pines Bank since May 2003.
Mr. Sarver organized and founded National Bank of Arizona
in 1984 and served as President at the time of the sale of that
bank in 1994 to Zions Bancorporation. Mr. Sarver was the
lead investor and Chief Executive Officer of GB Bancorporation,
the former parent company of Grossmont Bank, from 1995 to 1997.
Mr. Sarver served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of California Bank and Trust and as an Executive Vice President
with Zions Bancorporation from June 1998 to March 2001 and had
oversight for Vectra Bank, Colorado during such time. He served
as a director and credit committee member of Zions
Bancorporation from 1995 to 2001. Mr. Sarver is a director
and audit committee member of Skywest Airlines and a director of
Meritage Homes Corporation. He is also the Managing Partner of
the Phoenix Suns NBA basketball team and a member of the board
of directors of the Japanese American National Museum and the
Sarver Heart Center at the University of Arizona.
Donald D. Snyder has served as a director of Western
Alliance and of BankWest of Nevada since 1997. He had earlier
served as a founding director of the entity created to charter
BankWest Corporation and was one of its initial investors.
Mr. Snyder is the Chairman of the Las Vegas Performing Arts
Center Foundation. Mr. Snyder was the President of Boyd
Gaming Corporation from January 1997 to March 2005, having
joined the companys board of directors in April 1996, and
its management team in July 1996. Prior to that he was president
and chief executive officer of the Fremont Street Experience
LLC, a private/public partnership formed to develop and operate
a major redevelopment project in Downtown Las Vegas, and he
currently serves as chairman of the board of Fremont.
Mr. Snyder was previously chairman of the board of
directors and chief executive officer of First Interstate Bank
of Nevada, then Nevadas largest full-service bank, from
1987 through 1991. During his 22 years with First
Interstate Bank from 1969 to 1991, Mr. Snyder served in
various management positions in retail and corporate banking, as
well as international and real estate banking. Mr. Snyder
also serves as a director for Sierra Pacific Resources and Cash
Systems, Inc.
Merrill S. Wall has been the Chief Administrative Officer
and Executive Vice President of Western Alliance since February
2005. Mr. Wall has 35 years of banking experience,
most recently as Executive Vice President and Director of Human
Resources for Zions Bancorporation and its subsidiary,
California Bank & Trust, from October 1998 to February
2005. From 1987 to 1998, Mr. Wall worked for H.F. Ahmanson/
Home Savings of America as a senior executive managing both
human resources and training corporate-wide. Mr. Wall also
spent 17 years with First Interstate Bancorp in a variety
of commercial, retail and administrative positions.
Larry L. Woodrum has been a director of Western Alliance,
and President and Chief Executive Officer of BankWest of Nevada,
since their establishment in 1995 and 1994, respectively.
Mr. Woodrum has over 40 years of banking experience.
From 1979 until he joined BankWest of Nevada, Mr. Woodrum
served Nevada State Bank in a variety of capacities, including
Chief Credit Officer and Corporate Secretary. Prior to joining
Nevada State Bank, Mr. Woodrum was employed for
25 years by First National Bank of Nevada, where he was
engaged in a broad range of operational and consumer and
commercial lending activities. Mr. Woodrum is an active
member of the Nevada Bankers Association, and formerly served as
a member of its board of directors.
92
Director Independence
The New York Stock Exchanges rules include a requirement
that a majority of directors of NYSE-listed companies be
independent. For a director to be
independent under the NYSEs rules, the board
of directors must affirmatively determine that the director has
no material relationship with us, including our subsidiaries,
either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an
organization that has a relationship with us. Subject to certain
exceptions, the NYSE rules also expressly provide that a person
cannot be an independent director if:
|
|
|
|
|
at any time in the last three years, the director is, or has
been employed by us, or has an immediate family member that
serves or has served as one of our executive officers; |
|
|
|
the director or an immediate family member has received more
than $100,000 in direct compensation from us over a twelve-month
period during the last three years, other than for director or
committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred
compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is
not contingent in any way on continued service); |
|
|
|
the director is a partner or employee of a firm that is our
current internal or external auditor, or the director has an
immediate family member who is currently a partner of such firm
or who is currently employed by the firm in its audit,
assurance, or tax compliance practice, or within the last three
years, the director or an immediate family member was a partner
or employee in such firm and personally worked on our audit in
that time; |
|
|
|
in the last three years, the director or an immediate family
member is or was employed as an executive officer by another
company where, at the same time, any of our present executive
officers serve or served on that companys compensation
committee; or |
|
|
|
the director is currently employed by, or, in the case of an
immediate family member, is employed as an executive officer by,
another company that has made payments to us, or received
payments from us for property or services that, in any of the
last three fiscal years, account for more than 2% of such
companys consolidated gross revenue or $1,000,000,
whichever is greater. |
Of the 14 persons who currently serve on our Board of Directors,
nine have been determined by us to be independent for purposes
of Section 303A of the Listed Company Manual of the New
York Stock Exchange, and the new director to be appointed
following the merger, is also expected to be considered
independent under the New York Stock Exchange regulations. The
Board of Directors based these determinations primarily on a
review of the responses of the directors to questions regarding
employment and compensation history, affiliations and family and
other relationships and on discussions with such directors.
Mr. Sarver and Mr. Woodrum are not considered
independent because they are executive officers of Western
Alliance and/or one of our banking subsidiaries. Mr. Hilton
is not considered independent because Mr. Sarver was a
member of the compensation committee of Meritage Homes
Corporation until February 2004 and Mr. Hilton is the
Co-Chairman, Chief Executive Officer of Meritage. Mr. A.
Marshall is not considered independent because of his position
as Chairman of BankWest of Nevada, and Mr. T. Marshall is
not considered independent since he is Mr. A.
Marshalls son.
Board Composition
Our bylaws provide that the board will consist of not less than
eight nor more than 15 directors and the board of directors
may, from time to time, fix the number of directors. Our board
is currently comprised of 14 directors. Following
consummation of the merger, our board will be comprised of
15 directors once the new director is appointed.
In accordance with the terms of our articles of incorporation,
the terms of office of the directors are divided into three
classes:
|
|
|
|
|
Class I, whose term will expire at the annual meeting of
shareholders to be held in 2006; |
|
|
|
Class II, whose term will expire at the annual meeting of
shareholders to be held in 2007; and |
93
|
|
|
|
|
Class III whose term will expire at the annual meeting of
shareholders to be held in 2008. |
The Class I directors are Messrs. Baker, Beach, Boyd
and Hilton and Ms. Johnson, the Class II directors are
Messrs. Mack, A. Marshall and T. Marshall and
Drs. Nagy and Nave, and the Class III directors are
Messrs. Nigro, Sarver, Snyder and Woodrum. At each annual
meeting of shareholders, after the initial classification of the
board of directors, the successors to directors whose terms will
then expire will be elected to serve from the time of election
and qualification until the third annual shareholders
meeting following election. The number of directors may be
changed only by resolution of the board of directors. Any
additional directorships resulting from an increase in the
number of directors will be distributed among the three classes
so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of
one-third of the directors. This classification of the board of
directors may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes
in control of management.
Committees
of the Board of Directors
Our board of directors has established four (4) committees:
|
|
|
|
|
the Audit Committee; |
|
|
|
the Compensation Committee; |
|
|
|
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; and |
|
|
|
the Credit Committee. |
Information with respect to these committees is listed below. We
may appoint additional committees of our board of directors in
the future, including for purposes of complying with all
applicable corporate governance rules of the New York Stock
Exchange.
Our audit committee consists of four independent directors
(Messrs. Beach, Mack, Nigro and Dr. Nave).
Mr. Nigro serves as the chairman and our board of directors
has determined that he qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert, as such term is defined in applicable
SEC regulations, and that he meets the New York Stock Exchange
standard of possessing accounting or related financial
management expertise. The audit committees primary duties
include:
|
|
|
|
|
serving as an independent and objective body to monitor and
assess our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements,
our financial reporting processes and related internal control
systems and the general creation and performance of our internal
audit function; |
|
|
|
overseeing the compliance of our internal audit function with
the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002; |
|
|
|
overseeing the audit and other services of our outside auditors
and being directly responsible for the appointment,
independence, qualifications, compensation and oversight of the
outside auditors, who will report directly to the audit
committee; |
|
|
|
providing an open means of communication among our outside
auditors, accountants, financial and senior management, our
internal auditors, our corporate compliance department and our
board; |
|
|
|
resolving any disagreements between our management and the
outside auditors regarding our financial reporting; and |
|
|
|
preparing the audit committee report for inclusion in our proxy
statement for our annual meeting. |
Our audit committee charter also mandates that our audit
committee pre-approve all audit, audit-related, tax and other
services conducted by our independent accountants.
94
Our compensation committee consists of three independent
directors (Messrs. Baker, Snyder and Dr. Nave).
Mr. Snyder serves as chairman of the compensation
committee. The compensation committees primary duties
include:
|
|
|
|
|
determining the compensation of our executive officers; |
|
|
|
reviewing our executive compensation policies and plans; |
|
|
|
administering and implementing our equity compensation plans; |
|
|
|
determining the number of shares underlying stock options and
restricted common stock awards to be granted to our directors,
executive officers and other employees pursuant to these
plans; and |
|
|
|
preparing a report on executive compensation for inclusion in
our proxy statement for our annual meeting. |
|
|
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. |
Our nominating and corporate governance committee consists of
three independent directors (Mr. Boyd, Dr. Nagy and
Ms. Johnson). Mr. Boyd will serve as chairman of the
nominating and corporate governance committee. The nominating
and corporate governance committees duties include:
|
|
|
|
|
identifying individuals qualified to become members of our board
of directors and recommending director candidates for election
or re-election to our board; |
|
|
|
considering and making recommendations to our board regarding
board size and composition, committee composition and structure
and procedures affecting directors; and |
|
|
|
monitoring our corporate governance principles and practices. |
Our credit committee consists of six directors
(Messrs. Hilton, A. Marshall, T. Marshall, Snyder and
Woodrum and Ms. Johnson). Mr. A. Marshall serves as
chairman of the credit committee. The credit committee reviews
the quality of our credit portfolio, oversees the effectiveness
and administration of our credit-related policies and monitors
our internal credit examinations.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
During fiscal year 2005, Messrs. Baker, A. Marshall and T.
Marshall served as members of our compensation committee.
Mr. T. Marshall, a director, owns Marshall Management Co.
Marshall Management has been sub-leasing office space from
BankWest of Nevada since September 2004. The annual lease
payments total approximately $123,000 per year.
Mr. Sarver, our President and Chief Executive Officer and a
director, is a member of the board of directors of Meritage
Homes Corporation. Mr. Sarver served on the compensation
committee of Meritage until February 2004. Mr. Hilton, a
director of our company, is the Co-Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Meritage.
During 2005, the Banks had, and expect to have in the future,
banking transactions in the ordinary course of business with our
directors, officers, and principal shareholders (and their
associates) on the same terms, including interest rates and
collateral on loans, as those prevailing at the same time with
other persons of similar creditworthiness. In our opinion, these
loans present no more than the normal risk of collectibility or
other unfavorable features. These loans amounted to
approximately 2.0% of total loans outstanding as of
September 30, 2005.
None of the directors who serve on the compensation committee
has ever been employed by Western Alliance.
95
Compensation of Directors
During 2005, all non-employee directors of the Banks received
compensation as set forth below. During 2005, the subsidiary
Banks held the following board of directors meetings:
BankWest of Nevada 11 in-person meetings and 2
telephonic meetings; Alliance Bank of
Arizona 11 in-person meetings and no
telephonic meetings; and Torrey Pines Bank 12
in-person meetings and one telephonic meeting. No separate fees
are paid to directors in their role as directors of Western
Alliance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Retainer | |
|
Per In-person Meeting | |
|
Per Telephonic Meeting | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
BankWest of Nevada
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
Alliance Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Torrey Pines Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
In fiscal year 2005, the chairman of the audit committee of
Western Alliance received an annual retainer of $10,000, and the
annual retainer for 2006 is $10,000. In addition, Mr. A.
Marshall received $50,000 in his role as chairman of BankWest of
Nevada.
Executive Compensation
The following table is a summary of certain information
concerning the compensation during the last three fiscal years
earned by our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
and the four other most highly compensated executive officers
who earned more than $100,000 in salary and bonus during our
last fiscal year (referred to as named executive officers).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Options/SARs | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Robert Sarver
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,300 |
(2) |
|
Chairman, President and Chief |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
(1) |
|
Executive Officer(1) |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
(1) |
Larry Woodrum
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
310,000 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
8,430 |
(2) |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer, |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
294,840 |
|
|
|
94,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
(2) |
|
BankWest of Nevada |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
284,048 |
|
|
|
67,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000 |
(2) |
Dale Gibbons
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
231,000 |
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
(2) |
|
Executive Vice President and |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
206,000 |
|
|
|
72,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,500 |
(2) |
|
Chief Financial Officer(3) |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
145,654 |
(4) |
|
|
58,333 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
James Lundy
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
212,000 |
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
6,013 |
(2) |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer, |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
206,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,915 |
(2) |
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
198,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
(2) |
Linda Mahan
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
5,285 |
(2) |
|
Executive Vice President and |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
160,365 |
|
|
|
41,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,939 |
(2) |
|
Chief Operations Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
148,846 |
|
|
|
28,757 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,567 |
(2) |
|
|
(1) |
Mr. Sarver did not receive a salary for years 2002 through
2004. Beginning in 2003, and pursuant to a Consulting Agreement
dated as of January 1, 2003, by and between Western
Alliance and SWVP Management Co., Inc., an entity owned and
operated by Mr. Sarver, Western Alliance made payments of
$60,000 per year to SWVP. The Consulting Agreement was
terminated in 2005. |
|
(2) |
Represents amounts contributed to the Western Alliance
Bancorporation 401(k) Plan on behalf of the executive officer. |
|
(3) |
Mr. Gibbons joined Western Alliance in May 2003. |
|
(4) |
Includes $29,500 of consulting payments paid to Mr. Gibbons
prior to joining Western Alliance. |
|
(5) |
Includes $1,109 incentive payment for successful completion of
outside banking education program. |
96
Stock Option Grants in Fiscal Year 2005
The following table contains information about option awards
made to each named executive officer during the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options/SARs | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
Granted to | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Employees in | |
|
Exercise or Base | |
|
Expiration | |
|
Grant Date | |
Name |
|
Option/SARs Granted | |
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
Price ($/Share) | |
|
Date | |
|
Present Value(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Robert Sarver
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Larry Woodrum
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
% |
|
|
16.50 |
|
|
|
1/25/15 |
|
|
|
76,760 |
|
Dale Gibbons
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
% |
|
|
16.50 |
|
|
|
1/25/15 |
|
|
|
76,760 |
|
James Lundy
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
1.85 |
% |
|
|
16.50 |
|
|
|
1/25/15 |
|
|
|
30,300 |
|
Linda Mahan
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
1.85 |
% |
|
|
16.50 |
|
|
|
1/25/15 |
|
|
|
30,300 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Options were granted on January 25, 2005 and vest annually
beginning on January 25, 2006 in five equal installments. |
|
(2) |
We used the minimum value method to estimate the grant date
present value of the options. We are not endorsing the accuracy
of this model. All stock option valuation models, including the
minimum value method, require a prediction about future stock
prices. The assumptions used in calculating the values shown
above were a risk-free rate of return of 4.09%, weighted average
life of seven years and no cash dividends. The real value of the
options will depend upon the actual performance of our common
stock during the applicable period. |
Aggregated Option/ SAR Exercises in Fiscal Year 2005 and
Fiscal Year 2005 Year End Option Values
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
the number and value of unexercised options to purchase our
common stock held at the end of fiscal year 2005 by the named
executive officers. We had no SARs outstanding as of
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised | |
|
In-the-Money Options/ | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Options/SARs at Year End | |
|
SARs at Year End(2) | |
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
Value | |
|
| |
|
| |
Name |
|
Exercise | |
|
Realized(1) | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Robert Sarver
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
268,050 |
|
|
$ |
893,500 |
|
Larry Woodrum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
1,169,020 |
|
|
|
939,230 |
|
Dale Gibbons
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
456,800 |
|
|
|
1,396,030 |
|
James Lundy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
1,027,800 |
|
|
|
785,475 |
|
Linda Mahan
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
281,040 |
|
|
|
27,750 |
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
637,468 |
|
|
|
442,875 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents the difference between the fair market value of our
common stock on the date of exercise less the exercise price. |
|
(2) |
The dollar values were calculated by determining the difference
between the fair market value of our common stock on
December 31, 2005 of $29.87 and the exercise price of the
option. |
97
Equity and Benefit Plans
The following table provides information about common stock that
may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights
under all of Western Alliances existing equity
compensation plans as of December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for | |
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under | |
|
|
to Be Issued Upon | |
|
|
|
Equity Compensation | |
|
|
Exercise of | |
|
Weighted-Average Exercise | |
|
Plans (Excluding | |
|
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
Price of Outstanding Options, | |
|
Securities Reflected in | |
|
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
Column (a)) | |
Plan Category |
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
2,124,794 |
|
|
$ |
10.10 |
|
|
|
915,700 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,124,794 |
|
|
$ |
10.10 |
|
|
|
915,700 |
|
|
|
|
2005 Stock Incentive Plan |
A description of the provisions of the Western Alliance
Bancorporation 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (referred to as the
2005 Stock Incentive Plan) is set forth below. This summary is
qualified in its entirety by the detailed provisions of the 2005
Stock Incentive Plan. You may refer to the exhibits that are a
part of the registration statement of which this proxy
statement/ prospectus is part for a copy of the stock incentive
plan.
Our board of directors and our stockholders previously approved
the BankWest of Nevada 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the
BankWest of Nevada 1997 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, the
Western Alliance Bancorporation 2000 Stock Appreciation Rights
Plan and the Western Alliance Bancorporation 2002 Stock Option
Plan (together, referred to as the prior plans). The 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan was approved by our stockholders at our 2005
annual meeting of stockholders. The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan is
an amendment and restatement of the prior plans and, therefore
supersedes the prior plans, while preserving the material terms
of the outstanding prior plan awards. Awards made under any of
the prior plans will be subject to the terms and conditions of
the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, which has been structured so as
not to impair the rights of award holders under the prior plans.
The material changes made to the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan
include adjustments to the terms of the prior plans to account
for:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in the number of reserved shares by 1,000,000; |
|
|
|
the inclusion of individual limits on the awards that an
individual may receive in a given year under the 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan; and |
|
|
|
the inclusion of new types of awards consisting of unrestricted
stock, stock units, dividend equivalent rights, and performance
and annual incentive awards that are in addition to the stock
options (incentive and non-qualified), stock appreciation rights
and restricted stock which may have been awarded under one or
more of the prior plans. |
The purpose of the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan is to attract and
retain highly qualified officers, directors, key employees, and
other persons, and to motivate such officers, directors, key
employees, and other persons to serve us and to expend maximum
effort to improve our business results and earnings.
As of December 31, 2005 the number of shares available for
issuance under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan was 3,040,494. Of
the 3,040,494 shares available for issuance under the 2005
Stock Incentive Plan, 2,124,794 shares represent awards
outstanding as of December 31, 2005.
The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan contains certain individual limits
on the maximum amount that can be paid in cash under the plan
and on the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be
issued under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan in a calendar year.
The limits on the number of shares issuable under the plan,
98
which are described in the following paragraph, become effective
at the expiration of a grace period which expires on the earlier
to occur of:
|
|
|
|
|
the first shareholders meeting at which directors are to be
elected held after the close of the third calendar year
following the calendar year in which our initial public offering
occurred; or |
|
|
|
the time at which the equity incentive plan is materially
amended. |
The maximum number of shares subject to options or stock
appreciation rights that can be issued under the 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan to any person is 150,000 shares in any
calendar year. The maximum number of shares that can be issued
under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan to any person, other than
pursuant to an option or stock appreciation right, is
150,000 shares in any calendar year. The maximum amount
that may be earned as an annual incentive award or other cash
award in any fiscal year by any one person is $5.0 million
and the maximum amount that may be earned as a performance award
or other cash award in respect of a performance period by any
one person is $15.0 million.
Administration. The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan is
administered by the compensation committee. Subject to the terms
of the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, the compensation committee may
select participants to receive awards; determine the types of
awards, terms and conditions of awards; and interpret provisions
of the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.
Source of Shares. The common stock issued or to be issued
under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan consists of authorized but
unissued shares and treasury shares. If any shares covered by an
award are not purchased or are forfeited, or if an award
otherwise terminates without delivery of any common stock, then
the number of shares of common stock counted against the
aggregate number of shares available under the 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan with respect to the award will, to the extent of
any such forfeiture or termination, again be available for
making awards under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.
If the option price, a withholding obligation or any other
payment is satisfied by tendering shares or by withholding
shares, only the number of shares issued net of the shares
tendered or withheld will be deemed delivered for the purpose of
determining the maximum number of shares available for delivery
under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.
Eligibility. Awards may be made under the 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan to employees, officers, directors, consultants
and any other individual providing services to us or an
affiliate whose participation in the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan
is determined to be in our best interests by our board of
directors.
Amendment or Termination of the Plan. While our board of
directors may suspend, terminate or amend the 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan at any time, no amendment may adversely impair
the rights of grantees with respect to outstanding awards. In
addition, an amendment will be contingent on approval of our
shareholders to the extent required by law. Unless terminated
earlier, the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan will automatically
terminate 10 years after its adoption by our board of
directors.
Options. The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan permits the
granting of options to purchase shares of common stock intended
to qualify as incentive stock options under the Internal Revenue
Code, referred to as incentive stock options, and stock options
that do not qualify as incentive stock options, referred to as
non-qualified stock options. The exercise price of each stock
option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our
common stock on the date of grant. If we were to grant incentive
stock options to any 10% shareholder, the exercise price may not
be less than 110% of the fair market value of our common stock
on the date of grant. We may grant options in substitution for
options held by employees of companies that we may acquire.
The term of each stock option will be fixed by the compensation
committee and may not exceed 10 years from the date of
grant. The committee determines at what time or times each
option may be exercised and the period of time, if any, after
retirement, death, disability or termination of employment
during which options may be exercised. The exercisability of
options may be accelerated by the compensation committee. In
general, an optionee may pay the exercise price of an option by
cash or cash equivalent, by tendering shares of our common stock
(which if acquired from us have been held by the optionee for at
least six months) or, provided that we are a publicly traded
company at the time, by means of a broker-assisted cashless
exercise.
99
Stock options granted under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan may
not be sold, transferred, pledged, or assigned other than by
will or under applicable laws of descent and distribution or
pursuant to a domestic relations order. However, we may permit
limited transfers of non-qualified options for the benefit of
immediate family members of grantees to help with estate
planning concerns.
Other Awards. The compensation committee may also award
under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
restricted shares of common stock, which are shares of common
stock subject to restrictions; |
|
|
|
stock units, which are common stock units subject to
restrictions; |
|
|
|
unrestricted shares of common stock, which are shares of common
stock issued at no cost or for a purchase price determined by
the compensation committee which are free from any restrictions
under the equity incentive plan; |
|
|
|
dividend equivalent rights, which are rights entitling the
recipient to receive credits for dividends that would be paid if
the recipient had held a specified number of shares of common
stock; |
|
|
|
stock appreciation rights, which are a right to receive a number
of shares or, in the discretion of the committee, an amount in
cash or a combination of shares and cash, based on the increase
in the fair market value of the shares underlying the right
during a stated period specified by the compensation committee; |
|
|
|
performance and annual incentive awards, ultimately payable in
common stock or cash, as determined by the compensation
committee. The compensation committee may grant multi-year and
annual incentive awards subject to achievement of specified
goals tied to business criteria (described below). The committee
may specify the amount of the incentive award as a percentage of
these business criteria, a percentage in excess of a threshold
amount or as another amount which need not bear a strictly
mathematical relationship to these business criteria. The
compensation committee may modify, amend or adjust the terms of
each award and performance goal. |
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits publicly
held companies to an annual deduction for federal income tax
purposes of $1.0 million for compensation paid to their
chief executive officer and the four highest compensated
executive officers (other than the chief executive officer)
determined at the end of each year (referred to as covered
employees). However, performance-based compensation is excluded
from this limitation. The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan is designed
to permit the committee to grant awards that qualify as
performance-based compensation for purposes of satisfying the
conditions of Section 162(m) at such time as the 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan becomes subject to Section 162(m).
Business Criteria. The compensation committee will use
one or more of the following business criteria, on a
consolidated basis, and/or with respect to specified
subsidiaries or lending groups (except with respect to the total
shareholder return and earnings per share criteria), in
establishing performance goals for awards intended to comply
with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code granted to
covered employees:
|
|
|
|
|
total shareholder return; |
|
|
|
total shareholder return as compared to total return of a known
index; |
|
|
|
net income; |
|
|
|
pretax earnings; |
|
|
|
earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and
amortization; |
|
|
|
pretax operating earnings after interest expense and before
bonuses, service fees and extraordinary or special items; |
|
|
|
operating margin; |
|
|
|
earnings per share; |
|
|
|
return on equity; |
100
|
|
|
|
|
return on capital; |
|
|
|
return on investment; |
|
|
|
operating earnings; |
|
|
|
working capital; |
|
|
|
ratio of debt to shareholders equity; and |
|
|
|
revenue. |
Effect of Extraordinary Corporate Transactions. The
occurrence of a corporate transaction may cause awards granted
under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan to vest, unless the awards
are continued or substituted for in connection with the
corporate transaction. A corporate transaction means our
dissolution or liquidation; a merger, consolidation, or
reorganization in which we are not the surviving entity; a sale
of substantially all of our assets or any transaction which
results in any person or entity owning 50% or more of the
combined voting power of our stock.
Adjustments for Stock Dividends and Similar Events. The
committee will make appropriate adjustments in outstanding
awards and the number of shares available for issuance under the
2005 Stock Incentive Plan, including the individual limitations
on awards, to reflect common stock dividends, stock splits,
spin-offs and other similar events.
Change in Control Accelerated Vesting. With respect to
the awards outstanding under the prior plans as of the effective
date of the Plan, all such awards become fully vested, and, in
the case of options, exercisable in connection with the
consummation of a change in control as defined in the applicable
prior plan, provided the award remains outstanding upon the
change in control and relates to a continuing employee or other
service provider and except to the extent retaining the unvested
status of certain outstanding options eliminates any excise tax
under section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code that, if
applied, would produce an unfavorable net after-tax result for
the option holder. With respect to awards made on or after the
effective date of the Plan, the committee may provide in the
award agreement that, in connection with the consummation of a
change in control as defined under the applicable award
agreement, the award shall become fully vested, and, in the case
of Options or SARs, exercisable.
We sponsor the Western Alliance Bancorporation 401(k) Plan,
referred to as the 401(k) Plan, which is a defined contribution
plan intended to qualify under Section 401 of the Internal
Revenue Code. All employees who are at least 18 years old
are eligible to participate. Participants may make pre-tax
contributions to the 401(k) Plan of up to 60% of their
compensation per payroll period, subject to a statutorily
prescribed annual limit. Each participant is fully vested in his
or her contributions. Contributions by the participants or by us
to the 401(k) Plan, and the income earned on such contributions,
are generally not taxable to the participants until withdrawn.
Contributions by us, if any, are generally deductible by us when
made. All contributions are held in trust as required by law.
Individual participants may direct the trustee to invest their
accounts in authorized investment alternatives. We match 50% of
the first 6% of compensation contributed to the plan. We
contributed approximately $596,000, $385,000, $230,000 and
$180,000 in 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
We sponsor the Western Alliance Bancorporation Nonqualified
401(k) Restoration Plan (the Restoration Plan), a
deferred compensation plan under which participation is
available to members of the Executive Management Committee.
Under the 401(k) Plan, there is a statutory limit on the amount
of compensation that can be taken into consideration in
determining participant contributions and Western Alliance
matching contributions. The Restoration Plan allows participants
to contribute 6% of base and bonus compensation, without regard
to the statutory compensation limit, but offset by participant
contributions actually made under the 401(k) Plan. A participant
who elects to make contributions then would receive a Western
Alliance
101
matching contribution under the Restoration Plan equal to 3% of
all compensation as offset by the amount of matching
contribution made on the participants behalf under the
401(k) Plan.
Noncompetition and Indemnification Agreements
On July 31, 2002, we entered into Noncompetition Agreements
with Messrs. Lundy, Sarver, Snyder and Woodrum. The
agreements are enforceable while each such person is employed by
us as a senior executive or is a member of our board of
directors and for two years following the conclusion of such
service. Each agreement provides that, other than with us, the
individual will refrain from (a) engaging in the business
of banking, either directly or indirectly, or from having an
interest in the business of banking, in any state in which we
engage in the business of banking; (b) soliciting any
person then employed by us for employment with another entity
engaged in the business of banking; or (c) diverting or
attempting to divert from us any business of any kind in which
we are engaged. The agreement does not prohibit passive
ownership in a company engaged in banking that is listed or
traded on the New York Stock Exchange, American Stock Exchange
or NASDAQ, so long as such ownership does not exceed 5%. In the
event of a breach or threatened breach, we are entitled to
obtain injunctive relief against the breaching party in addition
to any other relief (including money damages) available to us
under applicable law.
|
|
|
Indemnification Agreement |
We entered into Indemnification Agreements with each of our
directors and executive officers (the indemnitees).
These agreements provide contractual assurance of the
indemnification authorized and provided for by our articles of
incorporation and bylaws and the manner of such indemnification,
regardless of whether our articles or bylaws are amended or
revoked, or whether the composition of our board of directors is
changed or we are acquired. However, such limitation on
liability would not apply to violations of the federal
securities laws, nor does it limit the availability of
non-monetary relief in any action or proceeding against a
director. Western Alliances by-laws include provisions for
indemnification of its directors and officers to the fullest
extent permitted by Nevada law. Insofar as indemnification for
liabilities arising under the federal securities laws may be
permitted to directors, officers and persons controlling Western
Alliance pursuant to the foregoing provisions, Western Alliance
has been informed that in the opinion of the SEC such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in such
laws and is unenforceable.
The agreement provides for the payment, in whole or part, of
expenses, judgments, fines, penalties, or amounts paid in
settlement related to a proceeding implicating an indemnitee if
that person acted in good faith and in a manner he or she
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to our best
interests. With respect to criminal proceedings, the person must
have had no reason to believe the relevant conduct was unlawful
in order to obtain indemnification. Each agreement also provides
for instances in which we will advance funds to the indemnitee
and a related mechanism by which we may be reimbursed for such
advances if we are ultimately found not obligated to indemnify
the indemnitee in whole or in part. Further, we have agreed to
pay for all expenses incurred by an indemnitee in his or her
attempt to enforce the indemnification terms of his or her
agreement, any other agreement or law, our bylaws or our
articles of incorporation. We have also agreed to pay for all
expenses incurred by an indemnitee in his or her attempt to seek
recovery under any officers or directors liability
insurance policies, without regard to the indemnitees
ultimate entitlement to any such benefits.
Each agreement to indemnify is subject to a number of
qualifications. For example, it does not apply to any proceeding
instituted by a bank regulatory agency that results in an order
assessing civil monetary penalties or requiring payments to us
or instituted by an indemnitee against us or our directors or
officers without our consent. Further, our obligations are
relieved should it be determined by a judge or other reviewing
party that applicable law would not permit indemnification. We
are entitled to assert that the indemnitee has not met the
standards of conduct that make it permissible under the Nevada
General Corporation Law for us to indemnify our directors and
officers.
102
In the event of a change of control of us, each agreement
provides for the appointing of an independent party to determine
the rights and obligations of an indemnitee and us with regard
to a particular proceeding, and we have agreed to pay the
reasonable fees for such party. If there is a potential change
in control, the agreement provides that, upon the request of an
indemnitee, we will establish and fund a trust for payment of
reasonably anticipated expenses, and that the trust cannot be
revoked upon a change of control without the indemnitees
consent.
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
During 2005, subsidiary banks had, and expect to have in the
future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of business
with our directors, officers, and principal shareholders (and
their associates) on the same terms, including interest rates
and collateral on loans as those prevailing at the same time
with other persons of similar creditworthiness. In our opinion,
these loans present no more than the normal risk of
collectibility or other unfavorable features. At
September 30, 2005, our officers, directors and principal
shareholders (and their associates) were indebted to the Banks
in the aggregate amount of approximately $35.2 million in
connection with these loans. This amount was approximately 2.0%
of total loans outstanding as of such date. All such loans are
currently in good standing and are being paid in accordance with
their terms.
SWVP Management Co. Inc. and Western Alliance were parties to a
Consulting Agreement dated as of January 1, 2003, pursuant
to which consulting fees were paid to SWVP. Robert Sarver, our
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
owns SWVP. Western Alliance paid SWVP $60,000 in fiscal years
2003 and 2004. The agreement was terminated in 2005.
Todd Marshall, a director of Western Alliance and BankWest of
Nevada, owns Marshall Management Co. Marshall Management has
been sub-leasing office space from BankWest of Nevada since
September 2004. The annual lease payments total approximately
$123,000 per year. Todd Marshall is the son of director
Arthur Marshall.
Other Relationships
Robert Sarver, our President, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, controls several limited partnerships which invest in
commercial real estate. Directors Baker, Hilton, Mack, A.
Marshall, T. Marshall and Richard Doan (director
Torrey Pines Bank), R. Luther Olson (director
Alliance Bank of Arizona), Thomas Rogers (director
Alliance Bank of Arizona) and Mark Schlossberg
(director Torrey Pines Bank) have invested in one or
more of these partnerships as limited partners. None of these
investments are related in any way to our operating or financial
performance or the value of our shares. Mr. Sarver also is
the managing partner of the entity which owns the Phoenix Suns
NBA basketball team. Director Hilton and Francis Najafi
(director Alliance Bank of Arizona) are limited
partners in the Phoenix Suns ownership group.
Mr. Sarver also serves as a director of Meritage Homes
Corporation. Mr. Hilton is the co-chairman of the board and
chief executive officer of Meritage. Other than Mr. Sarver,
none of these directors is a managing or general partner in any
of these entities, nor do they have any other role that would
have a policy making function for such entities. William S.
Boyd, a director of Western Alliance, is the chief executive
officer of Boyd Gaming Corporation. Marianne Boyd Johnson,
Mr. Boyds daughter, is a director of Western
Alliance, BankWest of Nevada and Boyd Gaming Corporation. Robert
L. Boughner, a director of BankWest of Nevada and Boyd Gaming
Corporation, is the chief executive officer of Echelon Place, a
new development by Boyd Gaming Corporation. Donald Snyder, a
director of Western Alliance and BankWest of Nevada, was the
president of Boyd Gaming Corporation from January 1997 until
March 2005.
103
INFORMATION ABOUT INTERMOUNTAIN
General
Intermountain is a registered bank holding company under the
Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. Intermountain was incorporated
in 1999 in order to serve as the holding company for Nevada
First Bank, or Nevada First. Intermountains principal
office is located at 777 N. Rainbow Boulevard, Las
Vegas, Nevada 89107. Intermountain had approximately
100 shareholders as of December 31, 2005 and 1,485,522
shares of common stock issued and outstanding. On a consolidated
basis, as of December 31, 2005, Intermountain had
approximately $459.4 million in total assets,
$374.2 million in total loans, $395.5 million in
deposits and $31.7 million in total equity. There is no
established public trading market for the common stock of
Intermountain.
Nevada First was organized as a Nevada banking corporation in
1997 and began operations in January 1998. Nevada First is a
member of the Federal Reserve, is chartered to engage in the
banking business by the Nevada Division of Financial
Institutions and receives deposit insurance from and is
regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Nevada
First provides a full range of traditional banking services,
with a special emphasis on serving the banking needs of the
greater Las Vegas, Nevada areas business community.
Although Nevada First also offers consumer-banking services, it
generally targets its services to the needs of commercial
customers. Nevada Firsts services include the acceptance
of checking, savings, and money market deposits (all of which
are insured by the FDIC up to applicable limits), and the making
of commercial, real estate, construction, small business
administration and consumer loans. Nevada First also offers
travelers checks, safe deposit boxes, courier and other
services. Its headquarters are located at
777 N. Rainbow Boulevard, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107 and
it operates four branch locations in Henderson, a sub-region of
the greater Las Vegas area, the Summerlin region of the greater
Las Vegas area, the greater Las Vegas central business district
and Reno, Nevada.
Bank Lending
Nevada First grants commercial, construction, real estate and
consumer loans to customers. Nevada Firsts loans are
expected to be repaid from cash flows or proceeds from the sale
of selected assets of the borrower. Nevada Firsts policy
for requiring collateral is to obtain collateral whenever it is
available or desirable, depending upon the degree of risk that
Nevada First is willing to accept.
Nevada First had loan loss reserves of approximately
$4.1 million (approximately 1.11% of its total loan
portfolio) as of December 31, 2005. The allowance for loan
losses is established through a provision for loan losses
charged to expense. Loans are charged against allowance from
loan losses when management of Nevada First believes the
collection of loan principal is unlikely. The allowance is an
amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb
probable losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible,
based on evaluation of the collectibility of loans and prior
credit loss experience and peer bank experience. This evaluation
also takes into consideration such factors as changes in the
nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall quality, review
of specific problem credit, and current economic conditions that
may affect the borrower to the allowance that may be necessary
if there are significant changes in economic or other
conditions. In addition, the Federal Reserve Bank of
San Francisco, as an integral part of its examination
process, periodically reviews Nevada Firsts allowance for
loan losses, and may require it to make additions to the
allowance based on its judgment about information available to
it at the time of its examination.
Employees/ Labor Relations
As of December 31, 2005, Intermountain had no employees and
Nevada First had a total of 96 employees. None of the
companies employees is represented by a union. They each
consider their working relationships with the Nevada First
employees to be good and have never experienced an interruption
of operation due to any labor dispute.
104
Properties
Nevada First leases approximately 21,500 square feet in Las
Vegas, Nevada. Such property is used for its retail banking
business, for certain administrative and support functions and
for the principal executive offices of Intermountain and Nevada
First. Rent for the property is approximately $45,000 per
month. The lease for the property expires in 2007 with renewal
options in favor of Nevada First. In addition, Nevada First
leases approximately 3,300 square feet in the greater Las
Vegas business district. The monthly rent is approximately
$7,000 and the lease terminates in 2008 with renewal options in
favor of Nevada First. Nevada First also leases approximately
5,100 square feet in Henderson for a bank branch with a
drive through teller. The rent for this property is
approximately $20,000 per month and the lease will expire
in 2014. In June 2004 Nevada First decided to close this branch
and is currently looking to sublease the space. In December 2005
Nevada First agreed to lease approximately 3,100 square
feet in Las Vegas for a proposed branch site. Rent for the
property is approximately $9,500 per month and the lease
terminates in 2010, subject to two five-year renewal options.
Nevada First owns approximately 30,000 square feet of
property in the Summerlin region on which a 3,500 square
foot branch is located. Nevada First owns approximately
35,000 square feet of land in Henderson, Nevada on which a
3,500 square foot branch is located. In August 2004, Nevada
First agreed to lease approximately 3,200 square feet in
Reno, Nevada for a bank branch at a monthly rent of
approximately $9,500. The lease expires in 2009 and includes
three five-year renewal options. In February 2005, First Nevada
agreed to lease approximately 1,680 square feet in Reno,
Nevada for the Reno corporate headquarters at a monthly rent of
approximately $2,800 per month. The lease for the property
expires in March 2006. In December 2005 Nevada First purchased
approximately 1.034 acres of vacant land in the Reno,
Nevada for purposes of constructing a branch and a Regional Head
Office. The total purchase price was approximately $650,000.
Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business, Nevada First may be involved
in various legal proceedings. Nevada First is not aware of any
proceedings, which are likely to have a material adverse effect
on Intermountains financial position. Intermountain is
currently not a party to any legal proceedings.
Securities Authorized for Issuance
The following table provides information regarding
Intermountains equity compensation plans in effect at
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Future Issuance | |
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
Under Equity | |
|
|
to Be Issued Upon | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Compensation plans | |
|
|
Exercise of | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
(Excluding | |
|
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
Securities Reflected | |
|
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
in Column (a)) | |
Plan Category |
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
57,150 |
|
|
$ |
14.41 |
|
|
|
24,960 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
105
THE MERGER
The information in this section is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the full text of the merger agreement including
the exhibits attached thereto, a copy of which is attached to
this proxy statement/ prospectus as Appendix A and
which is incorporated by reference into this document.
The Parties
Western Alliance and Intermountain have entered into an
agreement and plan of merger pursuant to which Western Alliance
will acquire Intermountain and its wholly owned subsidiary
Nevada First Bank through the merger of Intermountain with and
into Western Alliance, with Western Alliance surviving.
Western Alliance is a bank holding company headquartered in Las
Vegas, Nevada that provides a full range of banking and related
services to locally owned businesses, professional firms, real
estate developers and investors, local non-profit organizations,
high net worth individuals and other consumers through
subsidiary banks and financial services companies located in
Nevada, Arizona and California. On a consolidated basis, as of
September 30, 2005, Western Alliance had approximately
$2.7 billion in assets, $1.6 billion in total loans,
$2.3 billion in deposits and $238.3 million in
stockholders equity.
Intermountain is a bank holding company whose principal business
presently is to serve as the holding company for Nevada First
Bank. Nevada First provides a full range of traditional banking
services, with special emphasis on serving the banking needs of
the greater Las Vegas, Nevada areas business community. On
a consolidated basis, as of December 31, 2005,
Intermountain had approximately $459.4 million in assets,
$374.2 million in total loans, $395.5 million in
deposits and $31.7 million in stockholders equity.
Bank Merger
Western Alliance and Intermountain have also agreed to merge
Nevada First Bank, a Nevada-chartered bank and a wholly owned
subsidiary of Intermountain, with and into BankWest of Nevada, a
Nevada-chartered bank
and a wholly owned subsidiary of Western Alliance, with BankWest
of Nevada being the surviving bank; this transaction is referred
to as the bank merger. Western Alliance may
determine, in its discretion, to delay the bank merger
indefinitely.
Background of the Merger
From time to time over the past several years,
Intermountains management and board of directors have
considered various strategic alternatives as part of their
continuing efforts to enhance Intermountains community
banking franchise and to maximize shareholder value. These
strategic alternatives have included growing internally and
through the opening of new branches, and entering into a
strategic merger with other banking institutions.
In this regard, from time to time, William Bullard and James
Rogers, members of the board of directors of Intermountain,
communicated informally with representatives of other financial
institutions, including Western Alliance, with respect to their
views regarding the banking industry and their respective
companies strategic direction.
In February of 2004, Robert Sarver, Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Western Alliance, Dale Gibbons,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Western
Alliance, and Art Marshall, a member of Western Alliances
board of directors, met with Intermountains board of
directors to discuss the possibility of a transaction between
Intermountain and Western Alliance. The discussions did not
progress further at that time as Intermountain believed it could
generate greater shareholder value through internal growth, but
management continued to explore other opportunities.
During September of 2005, Jim Nave, a member of Western
Alliances board of directors, discussed a possible
strategic alliance with Mr. Bullard. This discussion was
followed by various discussions between Mr. Bullard and
Mr. Sarver during September and October of 2005 regarding
the possibility of a transaction between Western Alliance and
Intermountain.
106
Intermountain also had ongoing discussions with other financial
institutions and had received a non-binding letter of interest
from another financial institution during this time. On
October 21, 2005, Messrs. Marshall and Gibbons met
with Mr. Schreck, a member of the board of directors of
Intermountain, to discuss a potential transaction.
Mr. Schreck informed Messrs. Marshall and Gibbons that
Intermountain had received a non-binding letter of intent from a
third party, but that Western Alliances proposal was
possibly superior and would receive consideration if put in
writing.
On October 22, 2005, Western Alliance delivered non-binding
letters of intent to each of Intermountains directors
describing Western Alliances proposed acquisition of
Intermountain. Intermountains board of directors
considered this proposal. On November 11, 2005, Western
Alliance delivered to Intermountains board of directors an
updated, non-binding letter of intent.
On November 21, 2005, William Boyd, a member of the board
of directors of Western Alliance, and Messrs. Marshall and
Sarver met with the board of directors of Intermountain to
discuss Western Alliances proposal and present to the
board the terms of Western Alliances letter of intent.
After that presentation, the board of directors of Intermountain
met to discuss the status of discussions with other financial
institutions regarding a strategic transaction. After
substantial discussion, Intermountains board of directors
concluded that Western Alliances proposal represented
superior terms for the shareholders of Intermountain compared
with the other potential acquirors proposal and authorized
management to pursue a transaction with Western Alliance on the
terms presented to the board and to negotiate definitive
agreements in connection therewith.
Intermountain and Western Alliance entered into a
confidentiality agreement on November 29, 2005 and Western
Alliance initiated due diligence on Intermountain on
December 3, 2005.
On December 6, 2005, Intermountain and its counsel received a
draft of a definitive agreement from Western Alliance.
Management of Intermountain reviewed the draft agreement and
over the next few weeks the terms of the transaction and
agreement were negotiated between Western Alliance and
Intermountain, and their respective counsel.
Western Alliances board of directors met on
December 28, 2005 to discuss the proposed transaction and
terms of the agreement. After this discussion, Western
Alliances board approved the transaction by the unanimous
vote of all directors, and authorized management to execute and
deliver the merger agreement, with such changes as management,
on the advice of legal counsel, deemed necessary or appropriate.
A special meeting of Intermountains board of directors was
held on December 30, 2005 to discuss the proposed
transaction and terms of the agreement. By unanimous vote of all
directors present, Intermountains board of directors
approved the merger agreement with Western Alliance and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, and
authorized management to execute and deliver the merger
agreement, with such changes as management, on the advice of
legal counsel, deemed necessary or appropriate, and to submit
the merger agreement to the Intermountain shareholders for
adoption and approval.
Intermountain and Western Alliance executed the definitive
merger agreement on December 30, 2005, and on the next
business day, January 3, 2006, Intermountain and Western
Alliance issued a joint press release announcing the transaction.
Reasons for the Merger and Recommendation of the
Intermountain Board of Directors
Intermountains board of directors has determined that the
merger is fair to and in the best interests of Intermountain and
its shareholders and, by the unanimous vote of all the directors
of Intermountain present at the meeting, approved and adopted
the merger agreement and the merger. ACCORDINGLY,
INTERMOUNTAINS BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
THAT ALL HOLDERS OF INTERMOUNTAIN VOTING COMMON STOCK VOTE
FOR APPROVAL OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT.
In the course of reaching its determination,
Intermountains board of directors consulted with its legal
counsel regarding its fiduciary duties, the terms of the merger
agreement and related issues, and reviewed with
107
senior management of Intermountain, among other things,
operational matters, the financial aspects and the fairness of
the transaction to the shareholders from a financial point of
view.
In reaching its determination to approve the merger agreement,
Intermountains board of directors considered all factors
it deemed material. The board of directors analyzed information
with respect to the financial condition, results of operations,
businesses and prospects of Intermountain. In this regard,
Intermountains board of directors considered the
performance trends of Intermountain over the past several years.
The board of directors compared Intermountains current and
anticipated future operating results to publicly available
financial and other information for other similarly sized
banking institutions. The board also considered the ability of
Intermountain to grow as an independent institution, the
prospects of Intermountain to make potential acquisitions, and
its ability to further enhance shareholder value without
engaging in a strategic transaction. In this regard,
Intermountains board of directors considered the long-term
as well as the short-term interests of Intermountain and its
shareholders, including whether those interests may best be
served by continued independence.
The board of directors used this information in analyzing the
options available to Intermountain.
In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement and the
merger, the board of directors also considered a number of
factors, including the following:
|
|
|
1. Intermountains board compared the purchase price
offered for the common stock to the purchase prices obtained by
comparable companies in recent transactions. |
|
|
2. Intermountains board of directors considered the
current operating environment, including but not limited to the
continued consolidation and increasing competition in the
banking and financial services industries, the prospects for
further changes in these industries, and the importance of being
able to capitalize on developing opportunities in these
industries. Intermountains board of directors also
considered the current and prospective economic and competitive
conditions facing Intermountain in its market areas.
Intermountains board also considered the challenges facing
Intermountain in remaining an independent banking institution,
the lack of opportunities to grow through potential acquisitions
or merger of equals, and the difficulties of further
enhancing shareholder value. |
|
|
3. Intermountains board of directors reviewed the
terms and conditions of the merger agreement, including the
parties respective representations, warranties and
covenants, the conditions to closing, and the fact that the
merger agreement permits Intermountains board of
directors, in the exercise of its fiduciary duties, under
certain conditions, to furnish information to, or engage in
negotiations with, a third party which has submitted an
unsolicited superior proposal to acquire Intermountain, and
provisions providing for Intermountains payment of a
termination fee to Western Alliance in certain circumstances. |
|
|
4. Intermountains board of directors considered the
ability of Western Alliance to pay the merger consideration, and
accordingly, reviewed Western Alliances financial
condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital position. |
|
|
5. Intermountains board of directors considered the
ability of Western Alliance to consummate the transaction in an
efficient and timely manner based on its history of consummating
other acquisitions. |
|
|
6. Intermountains board of directors considered the
likelihood of the merger being approved by the appropriate
regulatory authorities. See The Merger
Regulatory Approvals beginning on page 112 of this
proxy statement/ prospectus for more information. |
|
|
7. Intermountains board of directors examined current
financial market conditions with respect to shares of
Intermountain common stock. In particular, the board noted that
shares of Western Alliance common stock are publicly traded on
the New York Stock Exchange while Intermountains common
stock is relatively illiquid. |
|
|
8. Intermountains board of directors considered the
potential impact of the merger on Intermountains
customers. The board viewed the potential impact on customers as
positive in view of Western Alliances history of providing
exceptional service to customers, and the fact that the merger
will enhance |
108
|
|
|
the services available to Intermountains customers without
sacrificing the personal attention and dedication that
Intermountain has offered. |
|
|
9. Intermountains board of directors considered the
mergers impact on Intermountains employees. Although
the board recognized that Western Alliance did not make any
commitment to retain any or all of Intermountains offices,
the board viewed the impact on employees as generally positive,
in that they would become part of a more geographically
diversified institution with greater resources and opportunities
than Intermountain. The board also noted that Western Alliance
agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that
almost all of Intermountains employees remain employed
with Western Alliance in positions comparable to their positions
with Intermountain and to pay severance to employees to whom
such positions cannot be given. |
|
|
10. Intermountains board of directors considered
community and societal considerations, and Western
Alliances commitment to local civic groups, charitable
organizations, and the towns and cities in which it operates. |
|
|
11. Intermountains board of directors considered the
fact that the shareholders of Western Alliance would not be
required to approve the merger agreement. |
This description of the information and factors considered by
Intermountains board of directors is not intended to be
exhaustive, but is believed to include all material factors the
board considered. In determining whether to approve and
recommend the merger agreement, Intermountains board of
directors did not assign any relative or specific weights to any
of the foregoing factors, and individual directors may have
weighed factors differently. After deliberating with respect to
the merger and the merger agreement, considering, among other
things, the reasons discussed above, Intermountains board
of directors approved and adopted the merger agreement and the
merger as being in the best interests of Intermountain and its
shareholders, based on the total mix of information available to
the board.
Purpose and Effects of the Merger
The purpose of the merger is to enable Western Alliance to
acquire the assets and business of Intermountain and its
subsidiary Nevada First Bank. After the merger, Western Alliance
will merge Nevada First Bank into BankWest of Nevada. However,
the bank merger may be delayed by several weeks. Upon completion
of the merger, except as discussed below, the issued and
outstanding shares of Intermountains common stock will
automatically be converted into the merger consideration. See
Merger Consideration.
Structure
Intermountain will merge into Western Alliance with Western
Alliance continuing as the surviving entity following the
merger. When the merger takes place, except as discussed below,
each issued and outstanding share of Intermountains common
stock will be converted into the right to receive cash and
shares of Western Alliances common stock based on the
merger consideration, as described below. Cash will be paid
instead of fractional shares of Western Alliance common stock.
Shares of Intermountains common stock held as treasury
stock or held directly or indirectly by Intermountain, Western
Alliance or any of their subsidiaries will be canceled and shall
cease to exist.
Western Alliance and Intermountain expect that the merger will
take place in the second quarter of 2006, or as soon as possible
after we receive all required regulatory and shareholder
approvals and all regulatory waiting periods expire. If the
merger does not take place by July 31, 2006, the merger
agreement may be terminated by either party unless both parties
agree to extend it.
In addition, Western Alliance and Intermountain have agreed to
merge Nevada First Bank, a Nevada-chartered bank and a wholly
owned subsidiary of Intermountain, with and into BankWest of
Nevada, a Nevada-chartered bank and a wholly owned subsidiary of
Western Alliance, with BankWest of Nevada being the surviving
bank; this transaction is referred to as the bank
merger. Western Alliance may determine, at its discretion,
to delay the bank merger indefinitely.
109
Merger Consideration
The merger agreement provides that Intermountain shareholders
will have the right, with respect to each of their shares of
Intermountain common stock, to elect to receive, subject to
proration as described below, either (i) 2.44 shares
of Western Alliances common stock, or (ii) $71.30 in
cash, without interest.
No guarantee can be made that you will receive solely cash, if
you so elect, or a combination of cash and stock in accordance
with your election. As a result of the allocation procedures and
other limitations outlined in this document and in the merger
agreement, you may receive Western Alliance common stock or cash
in amounts that vary from the amounts you elect to receive.
Non-Electing Shares. Intermountain shareholders who make
no election to receive cash or Western Alliance common stock in
the merger, and Intermountain shareholders who do not make a
valid election, will be deemed not to have made an election.
Shareholders not making an election may be paid in cash, Western
Alliance common stock or a mix of cash and shares of Western
Alliance common stock depending on, and after giving effect to,
the number of valid cash elections and stock elections that have
been made by other Intermountain shareholders using the
proration adjustment described below.
Election Limitations. The total number of shares of
Intermountain common stock to be converted into Western Alliance
common stock in the merger shall be no less than
925,604 shares, or approximately 60% of the outstanding
shares of Intermountain common stock on a fully diluted basis.
The remaining shares of Intermountain common stock will be
converted into cash or stock depending on the elections of
Intermountain shareholders. Therefore, the cash elections are
subject to proration to preserve this requirement regarding the
minimum number of shares of Intermountain common stock to be
converted into Western Alliance common stock in the merger. As a
result, if you elect to receive only cash, you may nevertheless
receive a mix of cash and stock.
Treatment of Shares if Enough Stock is Elected. If
Intermountain shareholders elect to receive shares of Western
Alliance common stock in exchange for at least
925,604 shares of Intermountain common stock, then
Intermountain shareholders who have made a valid election with
respect to their shares will receive cash, stock or a
combination of cash and stock in exchange for their shares in
accordance with their election and Intermountain shareholders
who have made no election will receive cash in exchange for
their shares.
Proration if Too Much Cash is Elected. If Intermountain
shareholders elect to receive shares of Western Alliance common
stock in exchange for fewer than 925,604 shares of
Intermountain common stock, then all Intermountain shareholders
who elected to receive Western Alliance common stock will
receive Western Alliance common stock and those shareholders who
have elected cash or have made no election will be treated in
the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
If the number of shares held by Intermountain shareholders who
have made no election is sufficient to make up the shortfall in
the number of shares of Intermountain common stock to be
converted into shares of Western Alliance common stock, then all
Intermountain shareholders who made a cash election with respect
to some or all of their shares will receive cash for all of the
shares with respect to which they made a cash election, and
those shareholders who made no election will receive a
combination of cash and Western Alliance common stock in
whatever proportion is necessary to make up the shortfall. |
|
|
|
If the number of shares held by Intermountain shareholders who
have made no election is insufficient to make up the shortfall,
then all of those shares will be converted into Western Alliance
common stock and those Intermountain shareholders who made a
cash election with respect to some or all of their shares will
receive a combination of cash and Western Alliance common stock
in whatever proportion is necessary to make up the shortfall. |
Intermountain Stock Options. Upon completion of the
merger, each Intermountain stock option which is outstanding
immediately before the merger, whether or not exercisable or
vested, will be converted into an
110
option to purchase shares of Western Alliance common stock in an
amount and at an exercise price determined on the following
basis:
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of Western Alliance common stock to be
subject to the option immediately after the effective time of
the merger will be equal to the product of the number of shares
of Intermountain common stock subject to the option immediately
before the merger, multiplied by 2.44. Any fractional shares of
Western Alliance common stock resulting from this multiplication
will be rounded down to the nearest whole share; and |
|
|
|
the exercise price per share of Western Alliance common stock
under the converted option immediately after the merger will be
equal to the exercise price per share of Intermountain common
stock under the option immediately before the merger divided by
2.44, provided that the exercise price will be rounded up to the
nearest cent. |
The adjustment will be made in a manner consistent with
Section 424(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. The duration and other terms of the Intermountain
options will otherwise be unchanged except that all references
to Intermountain in any of the Intermountain stock plans (and
corresponding references in any option agreement documenting
such option) shall be deemed to be references to Western
Alliance.
Fractions of Shares. Certificates for fractions of shares
of Western Alliances common stock will not be issued.
Instead of a fractional share of Western Alliances common
stock, an Intermountain shareholder will be entitled to receive
an amount of cash equal to the product obtained by multiplying
(A) the fractional share interest to which the holder would
otherwise be entitled by (B) the average of the
4:00 p.m. Eastern time closing sales prices of Western
Alliance common stock reported on the New York Stock Exchange
composite tape for the 20 consecutive trading days immediately
preceding but not including the third to last trading day prior
to the closing date for the merger.
Conversion. The conversion of Intermountains common
stock into the merger consideration will occur automatically
upon completion of the merger. Under the merger agreement, after
the effective time of the merger, Western Alliance will cause
its exchange agent to pay the purchase price to each
Intermountain shareholder who surrenders the appropriate
documents to the exchange agent. In this document, we use the
term purchase price to refer to the (i) shares
(if any) of Western Alliances common stock, (ii) cash
(if any) and (iii) any cash to be paid instead of a
fraction of a share of Western Alliances common stock,
payable to each holder of Intermountains common stock.
Election Procedures; Surrender of Stock Certificates
An election form is being mailed under separate cover on or
about the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus. The election
form entitles the record holder of Intermountain common stock to
specify (a) the number of shares of Intermountain common
stock owned by such holder for which the holder elects to
receive 2.44 shares of Western Alliance common stock, or
(b) the number of shares of Intermountain common stock
owned by such holder for which the holder elects to receive
$71.30 in cash, without interest. If no election is made, then
such holder shall receive cash, stock or a combination of cash
and stock in the merger as outlined above.
To make an effective election, a record shareholder must submit
a properly completed election form to American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, which will be acting as the
exchange agent, on or before 5:00 p.m., New York City time,
on March 27, 2006 (the election deadline). An
election form will be deemed properly completed only if
accompanied by stock certificates representing all shares of
Intermountain common stock covered by the election form. You may
change your election at any time prior to the election deadline
by written notice accompanied by a properly completed and
signed, revised election form received by the exchange agent
prior to the election deadline. You may revoke your election by
written notice received by the exchange agent prior to the
election deadline or by withdrawal of your stock certificates
prior to the election deadline. All elections will be revoked
automatically if the merger agreement is terminated.
111
Shareholders will not be entitled to revoke or change their
elections following the election deadline. As a result,
shareholders who have made elections will be unable to transfer
their shares of Intermountain common stock during the interval
between the election deadline and the date of completion of the
merger.
Intermountain shareholders who do not submit a properly
completed election form or revoke their election form prior to
the election deadline will have their shares of Intermountain
common stock designated as non-election shares and will receive
cash, stock or a combination of stock and cash as outlined
above. Intermountain stock certificates represented by elections
that have been revoked will be returned without charge.
Western Alliance will deposit with the exchange agent the
certificates representing Western Alliances common stock
and cash to be issued to Intermountain shareholders in exchange
for Intermountains common stock. As soon as practicable
after the completion of the merger, the exchange agent will mail
to Intermountain shareholders who do not submit election forms a
letter of transmittal, together with instructions for the
exchange of their Intermountain stock certificates for the
merger consideration. Upon surrendering his or her
certificate(s) representing shares of Intermountains
common stock, together with the signed letter of transmittal,
the Intermountain shareholder shall be entitled to receive, as
applicable (i) certificate(s) representing a number of
whole shares of Western Alliances common stock determined
in accordance with the exchange ratio, (ii) a check
representing the amount of cash to which such holder shall have
become entitled to, and (iii) a check representing the
amount of cash in lieu of fractional shares. You will not be
paid dividends or other distributions declared after the merger
with respect to any Western Alliance common stock into which
your shares have been converted until you surrender your
Intermountain stock certificates for exchange. No interest will
be paid or accrue to Intermountain shareholders on the cash
consideration, cash instead of fractional shares or unpaid
dividends and distributions, if any. After the effective time of
the merger, there will be no further transfers of the
Intermountain common stock. Intermountain stock certificates
presented for transfer after the completion of the merger will
be cancelled and exchanged for the merger consideration.
If your stock certificates have been lost, stolen or destroyed,
you will have to prove your ownership of these certificates and
certify that they were lost, stolen or destroyed before you
receive any consideration for your shares. Upon request,
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company will send you
instructions on how to provide evidence of ownership.
If any certificate representing shares of Western
Alliances common stock is to be issued in a name other
than that in which the certificate for shares surrendered in
exchange is registered, or cash is to be paid to a person other
than the registered holder, it will be a condition of issuance
or payment that the certificate so surrendered be properly
endorsed or otherwise be in proper form for transfer and that
the person requesting the exchange either:
|
|
|
|
|
pay to the exchange agent in advance any transfer or other taxes
required by reason of the issuance of a certificate or payment
to a person other than the registered holder of the certificate
surrendered, or |
|
|
|
establish to the satisfaction of the exchange agent that the tax
has been paid or is not payable. |
Any portion of the purchase price made available to the exchange
agent that remains unclaimed by Intermountain shareholders for
six months after the effective time of the merger will be
returned to Western Alliance. Any Intermountain shareholder who
has not exchanged shares of Intermountains common stock
for the purchase price in accordance with the merger agreement
before that time may look only to Western Alliance for payment
of the purchase price for these shares and any unpaid dividends
or distributions after that time. Nonetheless, Western Alliance,
Intermountain, the exchange agent or any other person will not
be liable to any Intermountain shareholder for any amount
properly delivered to a public official under applicable
abandoned property, escheat or similar laws.
Regulatory Approvals
For the mergers of Western Alliance and Intermountain and of
BankWest of Nevada and Nevada First Bank to take place, we must
receive approvals from the Federal Reserve Board (the
FRB), the Nevada
112
Financial Institutions Division (the NFID) and the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC). In
this section, we refer to these approvals as the required
regulatory approvals. Western Alliance and Intermountain
have agreed to cooperate to obtain the required regulatory
approvals.
BankWest of Nevada has filed with the FDIC an application for
approval of the merger of Nevada First Bank into BankWest of
Nevada. We refer to that merger in this section as the
bank merger. The bank merger is subject to the
approval of the FDIC under the Bank Merger Act provisions of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act and related FDIC regulations. This
filing will require consideration by the FDIC of various
factors, including assessments of the competitive effect of the
contemplated transaction, the managerial and financial resources
and future prospects of the resulting institution, the
effectiveness of the institutions involved in combating money
laundering, and the effect of the contemplated transaction on
the convenience and needs of the communities to be served. The
Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, commonly referred to as the
CRA, also requires that the FDIC, in deciding
whether to approve the bank merger, assess the records of
performance of BankWest of Nevada and Nevada First Bank in
meeting the credit and other needs of the communities they
serve, including low- and moderate- income neighborhoods.
BankWest of Nevada currently has an outstanding CRA
rating from the FDIC. Intermountain currently has a
satisfactory CRA rating from the Federal Reserve
Bank of San Francisco. FDIC regulations require publication
of notice and an opportunity for public comment concerning the
application filed in connection with the bank merger, and
authorize the FDIC to hold informal or formal hearings or
meetings in connection with the application if the FDIC, after
reviewing the application or other materials, determines it
desirable to do so or receives and acts favorably upon a request
for a hearing or meeting. It is not unusual for the FDIC to
receive protests and other adverse comments from community
groups and others. Any hearing or meeting, or comments provided
by third parties, could prolong the period during which the bank
merger is subject to review by the FDIC. The bank merger may not
take place for a period of 15 to 30 days following FDIC
approval, during which time the Department of Justice has
authority to challenge the merger on antitrust grounds. The FDIC
will determine the precise length of the period in consultation
with the Department of Justice. The commencement of an antitrust
action would stay the effectiveness of any approval granted by
the FDIC unless a court specifically orders otherwise. If the
Department of Justice does not start a legal action during the
waiting period, it may not challenge the transaction afterward,
except in an action under Section 2 of the Sherman
Antitrust Act.
Western Alliance filed with the FRB an application under the
Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, for approval of
the merger of Western Alliance and Intermountain. In processing
this application, the FRB will evaluate the proposed transaction
under the same standards and using similar procedures as those
set forth above for the Bank Merger Act filing with the FDIC.
This filing also will be subject to a Department of Justice
antitrust review period.
Application also will be made to the NFID in order to effect the
merger of Intermountain into Western Alliance and the bank
merger. These applications will be subject to the review of the
NFID under Chapter 666 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. In
determining whether to approve the merger of Western Alliance
and Intermountain, the Nevada Commissioner of Financial
Institutions (the Commissioner) will consider the
effect of the proposal on Western Alliance and the banks that it
and Intermountain control, as well as the effect of the merger
on competition in banking. In determining whether to approve the
filing related to the bank merger, the Commissioner will
consider (i) the interests of the depositors, creditors and
stockholders of the banks, (ii) the public interest,
(iii) whether the application was filed for legitimate
purposes, (iv) the records of the banks of performance
under the CRA and of meeting the credit needs of the communities
they serve, (v) the safety and soundness of the banks, or
their subsidiaries and affiliates, (vi) the record of
BankWest of Nevadas officers, directors, managers or
principal stockholders of performance, efficient management,
financial responsibility and integrity, (vii) the financial
condition of the banks and whether the merger could jeopardize
the financial stability of BankWest of Nevada or the interests
of its depositors or customers, and (viii) the effect of
the merger on competition in banking. The Commissioner may also
consider any comments received from the public.
Western Alliance and Intermountain are not aware of any other
material governmental approvals that are required for bank
merger to take place that are not described above. If any other
approval or action is required, we expect that we would seek the
approval or take the necessary action.
113
The merger cannot take place without the required regulatory
approvals, which we have not yet received. There is no assurance
that we will receive these approvals, or if we do, when we will
receive them or that they will not contain a non-customary
condition that materially alters the anticipated benefits and
effects of the bank merger. Also, there is no assurance that the
Department of Justice will not challenge the merger of Western
Alliance and Intermountain or the bank merger on antitrust
grounds following regulatory approval, or, if a challenge is
made, what the result of a challenge would be.
Conditions to the Merger
Under the merger agreement, Western Alliance and Intermountain
are not obligated to complete the merger unless the following
conditions are satisfied:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement and the merger are approved and adopted by
the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of
the outstanding shares of Intermountain common stock entitled to
vote at the special meeting; |
|
|
|
all required regulatory approvals are obtained and remain in
full force and effect, all statutory waiting periods related to
these approvals have expired, and none of the regulatory
approvals or statutory waiting periods contains a non-customary
provision that materially alters the benefits for which Western
Alliance bargained in the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
the Registration Statement is declared effective by the SEC, and
no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the Registration
Statement is issued and no proceedings for that purpose are
initiated or threatened by the SEC; and |
|
|
|
no order, injunction or decree issued by any court or agency of
competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition
preventing the merger or any of the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement from taking place is in
effect, and no statute, rule, regulation, order, injunction or
decree is enacted, entered, promulgated or enforced by any
governmental entity which prohibits, restricts or makes illegal
the consummation of the merger. |
Western Alliance is not obligated to complete the merger unless
the following additional conditions are satisfied or waived:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of Intermountain contained in
the merger agreement are true and correct in all material
respects as of the date of the merger agreement and (except to
the extent such representations and warranties speak as of an
earlier date) as of the closing date of the merger as though
made on and as of the closing date; |
|
|
|
Intermountain performs in all material respects all covenants
and agreements contained in the merger agreement to be performed
by Intermountain at or prior to the closing date; |
|
|
|
Intermountain obtains the consents, approvals or waivers of each
person whose consent or approval is required in order to permit
the succession by Western Alliance and BankWest of Nevada
pursuant to the merger and the bank merger, respectively, to any
obligation, right or interest of Intermountain or Nevada First
Bank under any loan or credit agreement, note, mortgage,
indenture, lease, license or other agreement or instrument,
except where the failure to obtain consents, approvals or
waivers will not have a material adverse effect on
Intermountain, Western Alliance, Nevada First Bank or BankWest
of Nevada; |
|
|
|
no changes, other than changes contemplated by the merger
agreement, in the business, operations, condition (financial or
otherwise), assets or liabilities of Intermountain (regardless
of whether or not such events or changes are inconsistent with
the representations and warranties given in the merger
agreement) occur that individually or in the aggregate have or
would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect
on Intermountain; |
|
|
|
Intermountain causes to be delivered to Western Alliance on the
respective dates thereof comfort letters from
McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, dated the date on which the
proxy materials or last |
114
|
|
|
|
|
amendment thereto are approved for use, and dated the date of
the closing and addressed to Western Alliance and Intermountain,
with respect to Intermountains financial data presented in
the proxy materials; and |
|
|
|
that certain stockholders agreement dated June 15,
2001 by and among certain stockholders of Intermountain is
terminated. |
Intermountain is not obligated to complete the merger unless the
following additional conditions are satisfied or waived:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of Western Alliance contained
in the merger agreement are true and correct in all material
respects as of the date of the merger agreement and (except to
the extent such representations and warranties speak as of an
earlier date) as of the closing date of the merger as though
made on and as of the closing date; |
|
|
|
Western Alliance performs in all material respects all covenants
and agreements contained in the merger agreement required to be
performed by it at or prior to the closing date; |
|
|
|
the consent, approval or waiver of each person whose consent or
approval is required in connection with the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement under any loan or credit
agreement, note, mortgage, indenture, lease, license or other
agreement or instrument to which Western Alliance is a party or
is otherwise bound shall be obtained; |
|
|
|
the shares of Western Alliance common stock to be issued in the
merger are approved for listing on the NYSE; |
|
|
|
no changes, other than changes contemplated by the merger
agreement, in the business, operations, condition (financial or
otherwise), assets or liabilities of Western Alliance
(regardless of whether or not such events or changes are
inconsistent with the representations and warranties given in
the merger agreement) occur that individually or in the
aggregate have or would reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect on Western Alliance; and |
|
|
|
Intermountain receives an opinion of counsel that the merger
will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. |
Conduct of Intermountain Business Pending the Merger
The merger agreement contains various restrictions on the
operations of Intermountain before the effective time of the
merger. In general, the merger agreement obligates Intermountain
to continue to carry on its businesses in the ordinary course
consistent with past practices and with prudent banking
practices, with specific limitations on the lending activities
and other operations of Intermountain. The merger agreement
prohibits Intermountain from:
|
|
|
|
|
declaring or paying any dividends or other distributions on its
capital stock; |
|
|
|
splitting, combining or reclassifying any of its capital stock; |
|
|
|
repurchasing, redeeming or otherwise acquiring any shares of its
capital stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable
for any shares of its capital stock; |
|
|
|
issuing or authorizing or proposing the issuance of any
securities, other than the issuance of additional shares of its
common stock upon the exercise or fulfillment of rights or
options issued or existing under Intermountains stock
option plan in accordance with their present terms; |
|
|
|
amending its articles of incorporation or bylaws; |
|
|
|
making capital expenditures aggregating in excess of $25,000; |
|
|
|
entering into any new line of business; |
115
|
|
|
|
|
acquiring an equity interest in the assets of other business
organizations except in connection with foreclosures,
settlements or troubled loan restructurings, or in the ordinary
course of business consistent with prudent banking practices; |
|
|
|
taking any action that may result in any of its representations
and warranties contained in the merger agreement becoming untrue
or in any of the applicable conditions contained in the merger
agreement not being satisfied; |
|
|
|
changing its methods of accounting in effect at
December 31, 2004, except as required by changes in
regulatory or generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
|
adopting or amending any employment agreements between
Intermountain or its subsidiaries and their employees and
directors other than merit increases consistent with past
business practices, not to exceed 5% of such employees
base salary; |
|
|
|
entering into, modifying or renewing any agreement or
arrangement providing for the payment to any director, officer
or employer of compensation or benefits; |
|
|
|
hiring any new employee at an annual rate of compensation in
excess of $75,000; |
|
|
|
promoting any employee to a rank of vice president or more
senior; |
|
|
|
incurring any indebtedness for borrowed money or assuming the
obligations of a third party, except for short-term borrowings
with a maturity of six months or less in the ordinary course
consistent with past practices; |
|
|
|
selling, opening or closing any banking or other office; |
|
|
|
making any equity investments in real estate, other than in
connection with foreclosures or settlements in lieu of
foreclosures or troubled loan restructurings, in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past banking practices; |
|
|
|
making any new loans or modifying the terms of any existing
loans with any affiliated person of Intermountain; |
|
|
|
incurring any deposit liabilities, other than in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice; |
|
|
|
purchasing any loans or selling, purchasing or leasing any real
property other than consistent with past practices; |
|
|
|
originating (a) any loans except in accordance with
existing Intermountain lending policies and practices,
(b) residential mortgage loans, (c) 30 year
residential mortgage loans without interest rate, terms,
appraisal, and underwriting do not make them immediately
available for sale in the secondary market, (d) unsecured
consumer loans in excess of $200,000, (e) commercial
business loans in excess of $1,000,000 as to any loan or
$1,000,000 in the aggregate as to related loans or loans to
related persons, (f) commercial real estate first mortgage
loans in excess of $1,000,000 as to any loan or $1,000,000 in
the aggregate as to related loans or loans to related borrowers,
or (g) modifications and/or extensions of any commercial
business or commercial real estate loans in the amounts set
forth in the preceding clauses (e) and (f) other than
in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; |
|
|
|
making any investments other than in overnight federal funds and
U.S. Treasuries that have a maturity date that does not
exceed three months; |
|
|
|
selling or purchasing any mortgage loan servicing rights; |
|
|
|
taking any actions that would prevent the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement from qualifying as a
reorganization under section 368(a) of the Code; or |
|
|
|
agreeing or committing to do any of the actions listed above. |
116
Conduct of Western Alliance Business Pending the Merger
The merger agreement contains certain restrictions on the
operations of Western Alliance before the effective time of the
merger. The merger agreement requires that Western Alliance:
|
|
|
|
|
not take any action that may delay the merger or that may result
in any of the conditions under its control not being
satisfied; and |
|
|
|
file mutually acceptable proxy materials relating to the matters
described in this proxy statement/ prospectus. |
Third Party Proposals
Under the merger agreement, Intermountain generally may not, and
must instruct its officers, directors, employees, agents and
other representatives not to, maintain, initiate, solicit or
encourage (including by way of furnishing information or
assistance) or take any other action to facilitate any inquiries
or the making of any proposal that constitutes or reasonably may
be expected to lead to any competing proposal. The
merger agreement also prohibits Intermountain from holding
discussions or negotiations relating to any competing proposal
and from agreeing to or endorsing any competing proposal.
The merger agreement defines a competing proposal as
(i) any inquiry, proposal or offer from any person relating
to any direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of
Intermountain or any business line of Intermountain that
constitutes 20% or more of the net revenues, net income or
assets of Intermountain or 20% or more of any class of equity
securities of Intermountain, (ii) any tender offer or
exchange offer that if consummated would result in any person
beneficially owing 20% or more of any class of equity securities
of Intermountain or (iii) any merger, consolidation,
business combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution
or similar transaction involving Intermountain, other than the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Notwithstanding the above restrictions, in connection with a
superior competing transaction and subject to other
specified conditions, Intermountain will be permitted to furnish
information with respect to, or enter into discussions or
negotiations with, any person that makes an unsolicited bona
fide proposal to acquire Intermountain; provided,
however, that (a) the special meeting of Intermountain
shareholders to consider the merger has not occurred;
(b) the Intermountain board of directors has determined in
good faith, after consultation with outside counsel, that such
action is reasonably required in order to comply with the
boards fiduciary duties to the Intermountain shareholders
under Nevada law; (c) Intermountain provides prior written
notice to Western Alliance of its decision to take such action;
(d) Intermountain receives an executed confidentiality
agreement on terms no less favorable to Intermountain than those
contained in the confidentiality agreement between Western
Alliance and Intermountain; and (e) Intermountain keeps
Western Alliance informed, on a current basis, of the status and
details of any such discussions or negotiations.
The merger agreement defines a superior competing
transaction as any proposal made by a third party to
acquire, directly or indirectly, including pursuant to a tender
offer, exchange offer, merger, consolidation, business
combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or
similar transaction, for consideration consisting of cash and/or
securities, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the
shares of Intermountain common stock then outstanding or all or
substantially all the assets of Intermountain, and otherwise on
terms which the Board of Directors of Intermountain, determines
in its good faith judgment to be more favorable to its
stockholders than the merger and for which financing, to the
extent required, is then committed or which if not committed is,
in the good faith judgment of its Board of Directors, reasonably
capable of being obtained by such third party.
Expenses; Breakup Fee
The merger agreement generally provides that all costs and
expenses incurred in connection with the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement shall be
paid for by the party incurring such expense. However, if the
merger agreement is terminated by Western Alliance as a result
of Intermountains failure to hold the special meeting
within a specified time period, to recommend approval of
117
the merger or to oppose any third party proposal, the merger
agreement provides for Intermountain to pay all documented,
reasonable costs and expenses of the terminating party up to
$300,000, plus a breakup fee of $3,700,000. In the event the
merger agreement is terminated by Western Alliance due to
Intermountains shareholders not having approved the
merger agreement and (a) after the date of the merger
agreement (December 30, 2005) and before the special
meeting date, there shall have been a third party public
event (as defined in the merger agreement) and
(b) within 12 months following such special meeting,
Intermountain enters into an agreement for an acquisition
transaction (as defined in the merger agreement) or an
acquisition transaction otherwise occurs, Intermountain shall
pay all documented, reasonable costs and expenses of Western
Alliance up to $300,000, plus a breakup fee of $3,700,000. In
the event the merger agreement is terminated by Western Alliance
due to Intermountains willful material breach of a
representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained
in the merger agreement, Intermountain shall pay all documented,
reasonable costs and expenses of Western Alliance up to
$300,000, plus a breakup fee of $3,700,000. In the event
Intermountain has given written notice to Western Alliance that
Intermountain desires to enter into a superior competing
proposal or if Intermountains Board of Directors has
determined to change its recommendation in favor of the merger,
Intermountain shall also pay all documented, reasonable costs
and expenses of Western Alliance up to $300,000, plus a breakup
fee of $3,700,000. In the event the merger agreement is
terminated by Intermountain due to Western Alliances
willful material breach of a representation, warranty, covenant
or other agreement contained in the merger agreement, Western
Alliance shall pay all documented, reasonable costs and expenses
of Intermountain up to $300,000, plus a breakup fee of
$3,700,000.
Representations and Warranties
In the merger agreement, Intermountain made representations and
warranties to Western Alliance. The material representations and
warranties of Intermountain are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the proper organization and good standing of Intermountain and
Nevada First Bank; |
|
|
|
insurance of the Intermountains deposit accounts by the
FDIC; |
|
|
|
capitalization of Intermountain and Nevada First Bank and
ownership of shares of Nevada First Bank; |
|
|
|
existence of corporate power and authority of Intermountain and
Nevada First Bank to execute, deliver and perform their various
obligations under the transaction documents; |
|
|
|
board approval of the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
a listing of all consents and approvals required to complete the
merger; |
|
|
|
accurate disclosure of loan portfolio and timely filing of
reports; |
|
|
|
proper presentation of financial statements; |
|
|
|
Intermountains filings with the FDIC comply in all
material respects with applicable requirements; |
|
|
|
no brokers fees; |
|
|
|
absence of any material adverse change in Intermountain; |
|
|
|
absence of legal proceedings; |
|
|
|
timely filing of tax returns and absence of tax claims; |
|
|
|
existence of employee benefit plans and material compliance with
applicable law; |
|
|
|
existence of material contracts and their effectiveness; |
|
|
|
absence of regulatory agreements with banking regulators; |
|
|
|
material compliance with environmental law; |
|
|
|
adequacy of loss reserves; |
118
|
|
|
|
|
existence of properties and assets, absence of encumbrances, and
existence of good title; |
|
|
|
existence of insurance policies; |
|
|
|
operations in material compliance with applicable laws; |
|
|
|
existence of loans, their material compliance with applicable
laws, proper organization of loan information, and proper
perfection of security interests; |
|
|
|
accuracy of information regarding Intermountain to be included
in this document; |
|
|
|
existence of satisfactory internal controls; |
|
|
|
a listing of affiliates of Intermountain; |
|
|
|
labor matters; |
|
|
|
intellectual property matters; and |
|
|
|
anti-takeover provisions inapplicable to the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement. |
In the merger agreement, Western Alliance made representations
and warranties to Intermountain. The material representations
and warranties of Western Alliance are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the proper organization and good standing of Western Alliance
and BankWest of Nevada; |
|
|
|
capitalization of Western Alliance and ownership of shares of
BankWest of Nevada; |
|
|
|
existence of corporate power and authority of Western Alliance
and BankWest of Nevada to execute, deliver and perform their
obligations under the transaction documents; |
|
|
|
a listing of all regulatory consents and approvals to complete
the merger; |
|
|
|
absence of material regulatory agreements or legal proceedings; |
|
|
|
that the information contained in the various consolidated
financial statements of Western Alliance and its subsidiaries
delivered to Intermountain is true, correct and complete and
fairly presents consolidated operations results and financial
condition of Western Alliance and its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
accuracy of information regarding Western Alliance to be
included in this document; |
|
|
|
that except as set forth in Western Alliances quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2005 or in any other filing made
by Western Alliance with the SEC since December 31, 2004,
neither Western Alliance nor any of its subsidiaries has
incurred any material liability, except as contemplated by the
merger agreement or in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practices, and no event has occurred which
has had, or is likely to have, a material adverse effect (as
defined in the merger agreement) on Western Alliance; and |
|
|
|
since September 30, 2005, Western Alliance and its
subsidiaries have carried on their respective businesses in the
ordinary and usual course consistent with past practice. |
Termination and Amendment of the Merger Agreement
Before or after Intermountain shareholders approve the merger
agreement, it may be terminated:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of Western Alliance and Intermountain; |
|
|
|
by Western Alliance or Intermountain upon written notice if
30 days pass after any required regulatory approval is
denied or regulatory application is withdrawn at a
regulators request unless action is taken during the
30 day period for a rehearing or to file an amended
application; |
|
|
|
by Western Alliance or Intermountain if the merger has not taken
place on or before July 31, 2006, unless the failure to
complete the merger by that date is due to the terminating
partys failure to perform or observe its covenants and
agreements in the merger agreement; |
119
|
|
|
|
|
by Western Alliance or Intermountain if Intermountains
shareholders do not approve the merger agreement due to failure
to obtain the required vote at a duly held meeting of
shareholders; |
|
|
|
by either Western Alliance or Intermountain (provided that the
terminating party is not then in breach of any representation,
warranty, covenant or other agreement contained in the merger
agreement that, individually or in the aggregate, would give the
other party the right to terminate the merger agreement) if
there shall have been a breach of any of the representations or
warranties set forth in the merger agreement on the part of the
other party, if such breach, individually or in the aggregate,
has had or is likely to have a material adverse effect on the
breaching party, and such breach is not curable or shall not
have been cured within 30 days following receipt by the
breaching party of written notice of such breach from the other
party thereto or such breach, by its nature, cannot be cured
prior to the closing; |
|
|
|
by either Western Alliance or Intermountain (provided that the
terminating party is not then in breach of any representation,
warranty, covenant or other agreement contained in the merger
agreement that, individually or in the aggregate, would give the
other party the right to terminate the merger agreement) if
there shall have been a material breach of any of the covenants
or agreements set forth in the merger agreement on the part of
the other party, and such breach is not curable or shall not
have been cured within 30 days following receipt by the
breaching party of written notice of such breach from the other
party thereto or such breach, by its nature, cannot be cured
prior to the closing; |
|
|
|
by Western Alliance, if Intermountain fails to call and hold
within 60 days of the effective date of this registration
statement a special meeting of Intermountain shareholders to
approve the merger agreement, fails to recommend that
Intermountain shareholders approve the merger and merger
agreement, or fails to oppose a competing third party
proposal; and |
|
|
|
by Intermountain, if Intermountain has complied with its
obligations regarding competing proposals and has given written
notice to Western Alliance of its desire to enter into a
superior competing transaction (as defined in the merger
agreement) and complied with the expense and breakup fee
provisions described above. |
The merger agreement also permits, subject to applicable law,
the Boards of Directors of Western Alliance and Intermountain to:
|
|
|
|
|
amend the merger agreement except as provided below; |
|
|
|
extend the time for performance of any of the obligations or
other acts of the other party; |
|
|
|
waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties
contained in the merger agreement or in any document delivered
under the merger agreement; or |
|
|
|
waive compliance with any of the agreements or conditions
contained in the merger agreement. |
After approval of the merger agreement by Intermountains
shareholders, no amendment of the merger agreement may be made
without further shareholder approval if the amendment would
reduce the amount or change the form of the consideration to be
delivered to Intermountains shareholders under the merger
agreement.
Resales of Western Alliances Common Stock Received in
the Merger
Western Alliance is registering the issuance of the shares of
its common stock to be exchanged in the merger under the
Securities Act. The shares will be freely transferable under the
Securities Act, except for shares received by Intermountain
shareholders who are affiliates of Intermountain or Western
Alliance at the time of the special meeting. These affiliates
only may resell their shares pursuant to an effective
registration statement under the Securities Act covering the
shares, in compliance with Securities Act Rule 145 or under
another exemption from the Securities Acts registration
requirements. This proxy statement/ prospectus does not cover
any resales of Western Alliances common stock by Western
Alliance or Intermountain affiliates. Affiliates will generally
include individuals or entities who control, are controlled by
or are under common
120
control with Intermountain or Western Alliance, and may include
officers or directors, as well as principal shareholders of
Intermountain or Western Alliance.
Employee Benefits
The merger will result in acceleration of the vesting of all
options issued under Intermountains stock option plan.
After the closing date of the merger, except to the extent
Western Alliance or BankWest of Nevada continues in effect any
Intermountain benefit plan providing benefits of a similar type,
continuing employees of BankWest of Nevada will be eligible for
the employee benefits that Western Alliance or BankWest of
Nevada, as the case may be, provides to its employees generally
and on substantially the same terms and basis as is applicable
to such employees. Western Alliance has agreed to provide a
severance benefit equal to three months base salary
(subject to applicable tax withholding) to each BankWest of
Nevada employee who continues employment (other than any such
employee who is a party to any written agreement relating to
employment or severance) whose employment is terminated
involuntarily, other than for Cause (as defined
below), by Western Alliance or any Western Alliance subsidiary
within six months following the closing date of the merger. For
purposes of this severance benefit, Cause means the
employees poor job performance, personal dishonesty,
willful misconduct, breach of fiduciary duty involving personal
profit, failure to perform stated duties, violation of any law,
rule or regulation (other than traffic violations or similar
offenses) or final cease-and-desist orders.
Dissenters Appraisal Rights
Under Nevada law, when shareholder approval is required for a
merger and the shareholders are entitled to vote on the merger
pursuant to Sections 92A.120 92A.160 of the
Nevada Revised Statutes, or NRS, any shareholder is entitled to
dissent from the merger and obtain the fair value of his shares
under Sections 92A.300 92A.500 of the NRS. In
this section, we use the term appraisal rights to refer to the
rights set forth in these sections of the NRS. Because
Intermountain shareholder approval is required for the merger of
Western Alliance and Intermountain, under Section 92A.380,
you are entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the
merger. In accordance with Sections 92A.300
92A.500, if the merger takes place, Intermountain shareholders
who do not vote in favor of the merger will have the right to
demand the purchase of their shares at their fair value if they
fully comply with the provisions of
Sections 92A.300 92A.500 of the NRS. Fair value
means the value of the shares immediately before the merger
takes place.
This section presents a brief summary of the procedures set
forth in Sections 92A.300 92A.500 which must be
followed if you wish to assert your appraisal rights in
connection with the merger and demand the purchase of your
shares at their fair value. A complete text of these sections is
attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as Appendix B.
Shareholders asserting their appraisal rights are advised to
seek independent counsel concerning exercising their appraisal
rights. This proxy statement/ prospectus constitutes notice to
holders of shares of Intermountains common stock
concerning the availability of appraisal rights under
Sections 92A.300 to 92A.500 of the NRS.
To assert appraisal rights, shareholders must satisfy all of the
conditions of Sections 92A.420 and 92A.440:
|
|
|
|
|
Before the vote on the adoption of the merger agreement occurs
at the shareholder meeting, each shareholder who wishes to
assert appraisal rights must give written notice to William
Bullard, Vice President of Intermountain, before the vote is
taken, of the shareholders intent to demand payment for
his or her shares if the merger takes place and shall not vote
or cause or permit to be voted his or her shares in favor of the
proposed merger. Neither voting against, abstaining from voting,
or failing to vote on the adoption of the merger agreement will
constitute notice of intent to demand payment or demand for
payment of fair value within the meaning of Section 92A.420. |
|
|
|
A dissenting shareholder may NOT vote for approval of the merger
agreement. If an Intermountain shareholder returns a signed
proxy but does not specify in the proxy a vote against adoption
of the merger agreement or an instruction to abstain, the proxy
will be voted FOR adoption of the merger agreement, which will
have the effect of waiving the rights of that Intermountain
shareholder to have |
121
|
|
|
|
|
his shares purchased at fair value. Abstaining from voting or
voting against the adoption of the merger agreement will NOT
constitute a waiver of a shareholders rights. |
After the vote is taken at the shareholder meeting, if the
merger is approved, no later than 10 days after the merger
takes place, a written appraisal notice and form, accompanies by
a copy of NRS Sections 92A.300 92A.500
inclusive, will be sent to each shareholder who has given the
written notice described above and did not vote in favor of the
merger. The appraisal notice will state the results of the vote
on the merger agreement, where the payment demand must be sent,
and where and when share certificates, if any, must be
deposited. It will set a date, not fewer than thirty
(30) nor more than sixty (60) days after delivery of
the notice, by which the payment demand must be received from
the dissenting shareholder. The notice will include a form for
demanding payment that will require the shareholder asserting
appraisal rights to certify whether or not the shareholder
acquired beneficial ownership of the shares before
December 29, 2005, the date of the first announcement to
the shareholders and the media of the terms of the proposed
merger and that the shareholder did not vote in favor of the
transaction. The notice will also inform holders of
uncertificated shares to what extent transfer of the
uncertificated shares will be restricted after the payment
demand is received. Please note that shares acquired after
December 29, 2005, referred to in this section as
after-acquired shares, may be subject to different treatment in
accordance with Section 92A.470 of the NRS than shares
acquired before that date.
A shareholder who receives an appraisal notice must comply with
the terms of the notice. A shareholder asserting appraisal
rights who does so by demanding payment, depositing his
certificates in accordance with the terms of the notice and
certifying that beneficial ownership was acquired before
December 29, 2005 will retain all other rights of a
shareholder until these rights are cancelled or modified by the
merger. A shareholder who receives an appraisal notice and does
not comply with the terms of the notice is not entitled to
payment for his shares.
Appraisal rights under Sections 92A.400 may be asserted
either by a beneficial shareholder or a record shareholder. A
record shareholder may assert appraisal rights as to fewer than
every share registered in his name only if he objects for all
shares beneficially owned by any one person and notifies
Intermountain in writing of the name and address of each person
on whose behalf he or she asserts appraisal rights. A beneficial
shareholder may assert appraisal rights as to shares held on his
behalf only if he submits to Intermountain the shareholder of
records written consent before or at the time he asserts
appraisal rights and he does so for all shares that he
beneficially owns or over which he has the power to direct the
vote.
After the merger takes place, or within thirty (30) days
after receipt of a payment demand, Western Alliance will pay in
cash to each shareholder who complied with the terms of the
appraisal notice the amount Western Alliance estimates to be the
fair value of the shares, plus interest. The payment will be
accompanied by Intermountains balance sheet as of the end
of a fiscal year ending not more than sixteen (16) months
before the date of payment, an income statement for that year, a
statement of changes in shareholders equity and the latest
available interim financial statements; a statement of
Intermountains estimate of the fair value of the shares;
an explanation of how the interest was calculated; and a
statement of the dissenters right to demand payment under
NRS Sections 92A.300 92A.500. Within thirty
(30) days of payment or offered payment, if a dissenting
shareholder believes that the amount paid is less than the fair
value of the shares or that the interest due is incorrectly
calculated, the shareholder may notify Intermountain in writing
of his own estimate of the fair value of the shares and interest
due. If this kind of claim is made by a shareholder, and it
cannot be settled, Intermountain is required to petition the
court to determine the fair value of the shares and accrued
interest within 60 days after receiving the payment demand.
The costs and expenses of a court proceeding will be determined
by the court and generally will be assessed against
Intermountain, but these costs and expenses may be assessed as
the court deems equitable against all or some of the
shareholders demanding appraisal who are parties to the
proceeding if the court finds the action of the shareholders in
failing to accept Western Alliances offer was arbitrary,
vexatious or not in good faith. These expenses may include the
fees and expenses of counsel and experts employed by the parties.
All written notices of intent to demand payment of fair value
should be sent or delivered to, William Bullard, Vice
President, Intermountain First Bancorp, 777 N. Rainbow
Boulevard, Las Vegas,
122
Nevada 89107. Intermountain suggests that shareholders use
registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, for this
purpose.
Holders of shares of Intermountains common stock
considering demanding the purchase of their shares at fair value
should keep in mind that the fair value of their shares
determined under Sections 92A.300 92A.500 could
be more, the same, or less than the merger consideration they
are entitled to receive under the merger agreement if they do
not demand the purchase of their shares at fair value. Also,
shareholders should consider the federal income tax consequences
of exercising dissenters appraisal rights.
This summary is not a complete statement of the provisions of
the Nevada statutes relating to the rights of dissenting holders
of shares of Intermountains common stock and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to
Sections 92A.300 92A.500 of the NRS, which are
attached as Appendix B to this document. Holders of shares
of Intermountains common stock intending to demand the
purchase of their shares at fair value are urged to review
Appendix B carefully and to consult with legal counsel so
as to be in strict compliance with the requirements for
exercising appraisal rights.
Support Agreement
Concurrently with the merger agreement, and as a condition to
Western Alliances willingness to enter into the merger
agreement, Western Alliance and certain Intermountain
stockholders entered into a Support Agreement pursuant to which
the Intermountain stockholders party to such agreement have
agreed to vote all of the shares of Intermountain common stock
beneficially owned by them in favor of the merger. As of the
record date, the Intermountain shareholders who entered into the
Support Agreement with Western Alliance collectively held shares
of Intermountain voting common stock which represented
approximately 67.8% of the outstanding Intermountain voting
common stock. None of the Intermountain stockholders who are
parties to the Support Agreements were paid additional
consideration in connection with the execution of such agreement.
In addition to voting their shares of Intermountain common stock
in favor of the merger, each shareholder agreed, following
completion of the merger, not to sell, transfer, or encumber any
shares of Western Alliance common stock received by such
shareholder in connection with the merger for a period of six
months. If at any time during such six month period Western
Alliance proposes to file a registration statement with respect
to an underwritten public equity offering in which Western
Alliances shareholders may participate, then the
Intermountain stockholders who executed the Support Agreement
have the right to include their shares in the registration and
offering by Western Alliance, subject to certain restrictions.
Interests of Intermountain Directors and Executive Officers
in the Merger That are Different Than Yours
Some of the directors and executive officers of Intermountain
have interests in the merger that are different from, or are in
addition to, the interests of Intermountain shareholders. The
Intermountain board of directors was aware of these interests
and considered them in approving the merger agreement. These
interests include rights of certain executive officers under
change of control agreements with Intermountain, rights under
stock-based benefit programs and awards of Intermountain.
Change of Control and Severance Agreements. Intermountain
has previously entered into change of control and severance
agreements with the following five executive officers:
Messrs. Paredes, Olson, Menon and Ashby and Ms. Ochal.
The merger would qualify as a change of control event under
these agreements. The agreements provide that if upon a change
of control the executive is not offered a position comparable to
the position held by the executive prior to the merger,
Intermountain would be required to make a payment to the
executive of a portion of his or her base annual salary based on
his or her length of employment. Depending on the executive, in
some cases this payment may equal up to a maximum of two
years worth of severance pay.
Stock Options. Regardless of whether the executive is
offered a comparable position with Western Alliance upon the
merger, the stock options of the executives named above would
become 100% vested as of
123
the closing of the merger. Western Alliance would then be
obliged to purchase the executives stock options at the
same price it is purchasing shares in the merger. As of
December 31, 2005, these executives held options to
purchase 23,250 shares of Intermountain common stock. The
aggregate value of the payout for these options will be
approximately $1,238,205.
Retention Bonuses. Nevada First Bank has also agreed to
pay retention bonuses to certain non-officer level employees,
Messrs. V. Telles, D. Jones, D. Stephens, P. Miller, Mmes.
D. Meyer, S. Hescher, V. King and D. Hughes, provided that they
remain employed with Nevada First Bank through the consummation
of the merger. The aggregate value of these bonuses is
approximately $146,000.
Protection of Directors, Officers and Employees Against
Claims. In addition, Western Alliance has agreed to
indemnify and hold harmless each of Intermountains present
and former directors, officers and employees for a period of at
least six years from the effective time of the merger from costs
and expenses arising out of matters existing or occurring at or
before the consummation of the merger to the fullest extent
allowed under applicable law and the articles of incorporation
and bylaws of Western Alliance. Western Alliance has also agreed
that it will maintain Intermountains existing
directors and officers liability insurance policy,
or provide a policy providing similar coverage, for the benefit
of Intermountains directors and officers who are currently
covered by such insurance, for at least six years from the
effective time of the merger, with respect to acts or omissions
occurring prior to the effective time of the merger, subject to
a limit on the cost to maintain such coverage.
New Western Alliance Director
Following the completion of the merger, the board of directors
of Western Alliance will appoint to its board of directors a
representative of Intermountain who shall have been, immediately
prior to the effective time, either a member of
Intermountains board of directors or a holder of at least
5% of the capital stock of Intermountain.
New BankWest of Nevada Directors
Following the bank merger, BankWest of Nevada will invite all of
the members of Nevada Firsts board of directors to join
the board of directors of BankWest of Nevada.
Possible Alternative Structures
Western Alliance is entitled to modify the structure of the bank
merger, including the possible postponement or elimination
thereof, provided that:
|
|
|
|
|
there are no adverse Federal or state income tax consequences to
Intermountain shareholders as a result of the modification; |
|
|
|
the consideration to be paid to the holders of shares of
Intermountain common stock under the merger agreement is not
changed in kind or value or reduced in amount; and |
|
|
|
the modification will not delay materially or jeopardize receipt
of any required regulatory approvals or other consents and
approvals relating to the completion of the merger. |
Accounting Treatment
The merger, if completed, will be treated as a purchase by
Western Alliance of Intermountain for accounting purposes.
Accordingly, under accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States, the assets and liabilities of Intermountain
will be recorded on the books of Western Alliance at their
respective fair values at the time of the consummation of the
merger.
124
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE
MERGER
Material Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following summary discusses the material federal income tax
consequences of the merger to Intermountain shareholders. The
summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, referred to in this section as the Code, the
U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated under the Code and
related administrative interpretations and judicial decisions,
all as in effect as of the effective time of the merger, and all
of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect.
The summary assumes that the holders of shares of
Intermountains common stock hold their shares as capital
assets. The summary applies only to holders of shares of
Intermountain common stock that are U.S. persons. For
purposes hereof, a U.S. person is:
|
|
|
|
|
a U.S. citizen or resident, as determined for
U.S. federal income tax purposes; |
|
|
|
a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States or any political subdivision thereof; |
|
|
|
an estate whose income is includible in gross income for
U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its
source; or |
|
|
|
a trust whose administration is subject to the primary
supervision of a U.S. court and which has one or more
U.S. persons who have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust. |
This summary is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service and
there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will
not take a position contrary to one or more of the positions
reflected in this summary or that these positions will be upheld
by the courts if challenged by the Internal Revenue Service. No
ruling from the Internal Revenue Service has been or will be
requested with respect to the merger.
The summary does not address the tax consequences that may be
applicable to particular Intermountain shareholders in light of
their individual circumstances or to Intermountain shareholders
who are subject to special tax rules, including:
|
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations; |
|
|
|
mutual funds; |
|
|
|
dealers in securities or foreign currencies; |
|
|
|
banks or other financial institutions; |
|
|
|
insurance companies; |
|
|
|
non-United States persons; |
|
|
|
shareholders who acquired shares of Intermountains common
stock through the exercise of options or otherwise as
compensation or through a qualified retirement plan; |
|
|
|
shareholders who are subject to the alternative minimum tax; |
|
|
|
shareholders who hold shares of Intermountains common
stock as part of a straddle, hedge, constructive sale or
conversion transaction; |
|
|
|
traders in securities who elect to apply a
mark-to-market method
of accounting; and |
|
|
|
holders that do not hold their Intermountain common stock as
capital assets. |
This summary is for general information purposes only. It is not
a complete analysis or discussion of all potential effects of
the merger. It also does not address any consequences arising
under the tax laws of any state, locality, or foreign
jurisdiction or under any federal laws other than those
pertaining to the federal income tax.
125
The closing of the merger is conditioned upon the receipt by
Intermountain of an opinion of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley &
McCloy LLP that the merger will qualify as a reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. If
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP does not render
such opinion, the condition may be satisfied if Hogan &
Hartson L.L.P., counsel to Western Alliance, renders such
opinion. Assuming the merger is a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, the federal tax
consequences of the merger to you will depend primarily on
whether you exchange your Intermountain common stock solely for
Western Alliance common stock (except for cash received instead
of a fractional share of Western Alliance common stock), solely
for cash or for a combination of stock and cash.
Exchange Solely for Cash. In general, if, pursuant to the
merger, a holder exchanges all of the shares of Intermountain
common stock actually owned by it solely for cash, that holder
will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the
amount of cash received and its adjusted tax basis in the shares
of Intermountain common stock surrendered. Any such gain or loss
generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if the
holders holding period with respect to the Intermountain
common stock surrendered is more than one year at the effective
time of the merger, and otherwise will be short-term capital
gain or loss. Individuals generally qualify for favorable tax
rates on long-term capital gains. If, however, any such holder
constructively owns Intermountain common stock that is exchanged
for Western Alliance common stock in the merger, or otherwise
owns Western Alliance common stock actually or constructively
after the merger, the consequences to such holder may be similar
to the consequences described below under the heading
Exchange for Western Alliance Common Stock and Cash,
except that the amount of consideration, if any, treated as a
dividend may not be limited to the amount of such holders
gain.
Exchange Solely for Western Alliance Common Stock. If,
pursuant to the merger, a holder exchanges all of the shares of
Intermountain common stock actually owned by it solely for
shares of Western Alliance common stock, that holder will not
recognize any gain or loss except in respect of cash received
instead of a fractional share of Western Alliance common stock
(as discussed below). The aggregate adjusted tax basis of the
shares of Western Alliance common stock received in the merger
will be equal to the aggregate adjusted tax basis of the shares
of Intermountain common stock surrendered for the Western
Alliance common stock, reduced by the adjusted tax basis
allocable to any fractional shares deemed received in the merger
as described below. The holding period of the Western Alliance
common stock (including fractional shares deemed received and
redeemed as described below) will include the period during
which the shares of Intermountain common stock were held.
Exchange for Western Alliance Common Stock and Cash. If,
pursuant to the merger, a holder exchanges all of the shares of
Intermountain common stock actually owned by it for a
combination of Western Alliance common stock and cash, the
holder will generally recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount
equal to the lesser of (1) the amount of gain realized
(i.e., the excess of the sum of the amount of cash and the fair
market value of the Western Alliance common stock received
pursuant to the merger over that holders adjusted tax
basis in its shares of Intermountain common stock surrendered)
and (2) the amount of cash received pursuant to the merger.
For this purpose, gain or loss must be calculated separately for
each identifiable block of shares surrendered in the exchange,
and a loss realized on one block of shares may not be used to
offset a gain realized on another block of shares. Any
recognized gain will generally be long-term capital gain if the
holders holding period with respect to the Intermountain
common stock surrendered is more than one year at the effective
time of the merger, and otherwise will be short-term capital
gain. Individuals generally qualify for favorable tax rates on
long-term capital gains. If, however, the cash received has the
effect of the distribution of a dividend, the gain will be
treated as a dividend to the extent of the holders ratable
share of Intermountains accumulated earnings and profits
as calculated for United States federal income tax purposes. See
Possible Treatment of Cash as a Dividend
below.
The aggregate tax basis of Western Alliance common stock
received (including fractional shares deemed received and
redeemed as described below) by a holder that exchanges its
shares of Intermountain common stock for a combination of
Western Alliance common stock and cash pursuant to the merger
will be equal to the aggregate adjusted tax basis of the shares
of Intermountain common stock surrendered, reduced by the amount
of cash received by the holder pursuant to the merger (excluding
any cash received instead of a fractional share of Western
Alliance common stock), and increased by the amount of gain
(including any
126
portion of the gain that is treated as a dividend as described
below but excluding any gain or loss resulting from the deemed
receipt and redemption of fractional shares described below), if
any, recognized by the holder on the exchange. The holding
period of the Western Alliance common stock (including
fractional shares deemed received and redeemed as described
below) will include the holding period of the shares of
Intermountain common stock surrendered.
Possible Treatment of Cash as a Dividend. In general, the
determination of whether the gain recognized in the exchange
will be treated as capital gain or has the effect of a
distribution of a dividend depends upon whether and to what
extent the exchange reduces the holders deemed percentage
stock ownership of Western Alliance. As discussed below,
however, dividend treatment will generally not apply to a
minority shareholder in a publicly held corporation whose
relative stock interest is minimal and who exercises no control
with respect to corporate affairs. Gain recognized by such a
holder will generally be treated as capital gain.
For purposes of this determination, the holder is treated as if
it first exchanged all of its shares of Intermountain common
stock solely for Western Alliance common stock and then Western
Alliance immediately redeemed (the deemed
redemption) a portion of the Western Alliance common stock
in exchange for the cash the holder actually received. The gain
recognized in the deemed redemption will be treated as capital
gain if the deemed redemption is (1) substantially
disproportionate with respect to the holder or
(2) not essentially equivalent to a dividend.
The deemed redemption will generally be substantially
disproportionate with respect to a holder if the
percentage of the voting power and value of the Western Alliance
common stock actually or constructively owned by such holder
immediately after the deemed redemption is less than 80% of both
the voting power and the value of the Western Alliance common
stock actually or constructively owned by such holder
immediately before the deemed redemption.
Whether the deemed redemption is not essentially
equivalent to a dividend with respect to a holder will
depend upon the holders particular circumstances. At a
minimum, however, in order for the deemed redemption to be
not essentially equivalent to a dividend, the deemed
redemption must result in a meaningful reduction in
the holders deemed percentage stock ownership of Western
Alliance. In general, that determination requires a comparison
of (1) the percentage of the voting power and value of the
Western Alliance common stock actually or constructively owned
by such holder immediately before the deemed redemption and
(2) the voting power and the value of the Western Alliance
common stock actually or constructively owned by such holder
immediately after the deemed redemption. The Internal Revenue
Service has ruled that a minority shareholder in a publicly held
corporation whose relative stock interest is minimal and who
exercises no control with respect to corporate affairs is
generally considered to have a meaningful reduction
even if that shareholder has a relatively minor reduction in its
percentage stock ownership under the above analysis.
If the tests above for capital gain treatment are not met, the
recognized gain will be treated as dividend income to the extent
of the holders ratable share of Intermountains
accumulated earnings and profits. Individuals generally qualify
for favorable tax rates on dividends.
In applying the foregoing tests, the constructive ownership
rules of section 318 of the Code apply in comparing the
holders ownership interest in Western Alliance both
immediately after the merger (but before the hypothetical
redemption) and after the hypothetical redemption. Under these
constructive ownership rules, a holder is deemed to own Western
Alliance common stock that is actually owned (and in some cases
constructively owned) by certain related individuals and
entities, and is also deemed to own Western Alliance common
stock that may be acquired by such holder or such related
individuals or entities by exercising an option, including an
employee stock option. Moreover, the tests are applied after
taking into account any related transactions undertaken by a
shareholder under a single, integrated plan. Thus, dispositions
or acquisitions by a holder of Western Alliance common stock
before or after the merger that are part of such holders
plan may be taken into account. As these rules are complex, each
holder that may be subject to these rules should consult its tax
advisor.
127
Cash Received Instead of a Fractional Share. A holder who
receives cash instead of a fractional share of Western Alliance
common stock will generally be treated as having received a
fractional share and then as having received such cash in
redemption of the fractional share. Gain or loss generally will
be recognized based on the difference between the amount of cash
received instead of the fractional share and the portion of the
holders aggregate adjusted tax basis of the share of
Intermountain common stock surrendered which is allocable to the
fractional share. Such gain or loss generally will be long-term
capital gain or loss if the holding period for such shares of
Intermountain common stock is more than one year at the
effective time of the merger.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding. Unless an
exemption applies, the exchange agent will be required to
withhold, and will withhold, 28% of any cash payments to which
an Intermountain shareholder or other payee is entitled pursuant
to the merger, unless the shareholder or other payee provides
his or her tax identification number (social security number or
employer identification number) and certifies that the number is
correct. Each shareholder and, if applicable, each other payee,
is required to complete and sign the
Form W-9 that will
be included as part of the transmittal letter to avoid being
subject to backup withholding, unless an applicable exemption
exists and is proved in a manner satisfactory to Western
Alliance and the exchange agent.
The federal income tax consequences set forth above are
based upon present law and do not purport to be a complete
analysis or listing of all potential tax effects that may apply
to a holder of Intermountains common stock. The tax
effects that are applicable to a particular holder of
Intermountain common stock may be different from the tax effects
that are applicable to other holders of Intermountain common
stock, including the application and effect of state, local and
other tax laws other than those pertaining to the federal income
tax, and thus, holders of Intermountain common stock are urged
to consult their own tax advisors.
Options. As described above in the section titled
Merger Consideration Intermountain Stock
Options, holders of options to purchase Intermountain
common stock that are outstanding at the effective time of the
merger will have their Intermountain options converted into
options to purchase shares of Western Alliance common stock. The
assumption of the options by Western Alliance should not be a
taxable event and former holders of Intermountain options who
hold options to purchase Western Alliance common stock after the
merger should be subject to the same federal income tax
treatment upon exercise of those options as would have applied
if they had exercised their Intermountain options.
Holders of Intermountain options are urged to consult
their own tax advisors as to the specific tax consequences to
them of the merger, including tax return reporting requirements,
available elections, the applicability and effect of federal,
state, local and other applicable tax laws, and the effect of
any proposed changes in the tax laws.
128
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS
Beneficial Ownership of Western Alliance Stock
The following table sets forth information pertaining to the
beneficial ownership of the outstanding shares of Western
Alliances common stock as of December 31, 2005 by
(a) persons known to Western Alliance to own more than 5%
of the outstanding shares of Western Alliances common
stock, (b) each director and executive officer of Western
Alliance and (c) Western Alliances directors and
executive officers as a group. The information contained herein
has been obtained from Western Alliances records and from
information furnished to Western Alliance by each individual.
Western Alliance knows of no person who owns, beneficially or of
record, either individually or with associates, more than 5% of
Western Alliances common stock, except as set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
Common | |
Beneficial Owner(1) |
|
Beneficially Owned | |
|
Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Paul Baker
|
|
|
255,055 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
% |
Bruce Beach
|
|
|
81,168 |
|
|
|
* |
|
William S. Boyd
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Gary Cady
|
|
|
116,563 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Duane Froeschle
|
|
|
209,311 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Dale Gibbons
|
|
|
88,700 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Steve Hilton
|
|
|
245,055 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
% |
Marianne Boyd Johnson
|
|
|
4,606,331 |
|
|
|
20.19 |
% |
James Lundy
|
|
|
170,295 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Cary Mack
|
|
|
105,697 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Linda Mahan
|
|
|
61,484 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Arthur Marshall
|
|
|
231,996 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
% |
Todd Marshall
|
|
|
613,839 |
|
|
|
2.69 |
% |
M. Nafees Nagy
|
|
|
843,252 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
% |
James Nave
|
|
|
512,244 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
% |
Edward Nigro
|
|
|
263,660 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
% |
Robert Sarver
|
|
|
3,552,021 |
|
|
|
14.90 |
% |
Donald Snyder
|
|
|
209,371 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Merrill Wall
|
|
|
67,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Larry Woodrum
|
|
|
154,800 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (20
persons)
|
|
|
12,393,842 |
|
|
|
51.14 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
In accordance with
Rule 13d-3 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, a person is
deemed to be the beneficial owner, for purposes of this table,
of any shares of common stock if such person has or shares
voting power and/or investment power with respect to the shares,
or has a right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time
within 60 days from December 31, 2005. As used herein,
voting power includes the power to vote or direct
the voting of shares and investment power includes
the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. |
|
|
|
The table includes, with respect to Mr. Sarver,
30,000 shares held by Mr. Sarvers spouse over
which he disclaims all beneficial ownership. The table also
includes the following: 263,950 shares subject to
outstanding options exercisable within 60 days after
December 31, 2005 and 1,160,672 shares subject to
outstanding warrants exercisable within 60 days after
December 31, 2005. Shares subject to outstanding stock
options and warrants, which an individual has the right to
acquire within 60 days after December 31, 2005, are
deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the
percentage of |
129
|
|
|
outstanding securities of the class of stock owned by such
individual or any group including such individual only.
Beneficial ownership may be disclaimed as to certain of the
securities. |
|
|
Outstanding options reflected in the table are held as follows:
Mr. Baker, 2,800 shares; Mr. Beach,
1,600 shares; Mr. Cady 21,300 shares;
Mr. Froeschle 31,500 shares; Mr. Gibbons,
23,800 shares; Mr. Hilton, 2,800 shares;
Ms. Johnson, 2,800 shares; Mr. Lundy,
46,500 shares; Mr. Mack, 2,200 shares;
Ms. Mahan, 29,250 shares; Mr. A. Marshall,
2,800 shares; Mr. T. Marshall, 2,800 shares;
Dr. Nagy, 600 shares; Dr. Nave,
2,800 shares; Mr. Nigro, 2,800 shares;
Mr. Sarver, 15,000 shares; Mr. Snyder
2,800 shares; Mr. Woodrum, 54,800 shares; and
Mr. Wall 15,000 shares. Outstanding warrants reflected
in the table are as follows: Mr. Froeschle
44,381 shares; Mr. Hilton, 68,274 shares;
Mr. Lundy, 34,137 shares; and Mr. Sarver,
1,013,880 shares. |
|
|
(2) |
The business address of each of the executive officers and
directors is 2700 West Sahara Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada
89102, Telephone: (702) 248-4200. |
Beneficial Ownership of Intermountain Stock
The following tables set forth information pertaining to the
beneficial ownership of the outstanding shares of
Intermountains voting and non-voting common stock as of
December 31, 2005 by (a) persons known to
Intermountain to own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of
Intermountains voting or non-voting common stock,
(b) each director of Intermountain, (c) each of
Intermountains executive officers and
(d) Intermountains directors and executive officers
as a group. The information contained herein has been obtained
from Intermountains records and from information furnished
to Intermountain by each individual.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Number of Shares of |
|
Percentage of |
|
Western Alliance |
|
|
Intermountain Voting |
|
Intermountain |
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Voting Common |
|
Owned after the |
Beneficial Owner(1) |
|
Beneficially Owned |
|
Stock |
|
Merger(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William Bullard
|
|
|
118,519 |
(3) |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
1.2% |
|
Dipak K. Desai, M.D.
|
|
|
122,202 |
(4) |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
1.5% |
|
Mark Fine
|
|
|
46,127 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Timothy Herbst
|
|
|
48,798 |
(5) |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
K. James King
|
|
|
40,314 |
(6) |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Thomas Land
|
|
|
114,086 |
(7) |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
1.3% |
|
Michael Luce
|
|
|
52,169 |
(8) |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Sandra Mallin
|
|
|
4,426 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Ned Martin
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Arvind A. Menon
|
|
|
34,199 |
(9) |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Hugh G. Merriman, M.D.
|
|
|
34,859 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
James E. Rogers
|
|
|
111,422 |
(10) |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
2.1% |
|
Perry Rogers
|
|
|
9,759 |
(11) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Frank Schreck, Jr.
|
|
|
48,802 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Harvey Whittemore
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
William C. Wortman
|
|
|
48,802 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
All Current Directors and Executive Officers as a group (16
persons)
|
|
|
860,587 |
(12) |
|
|
65.9 |
% |
|
|
9.8% |
|
Other Principal Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andre Agassi
|
|
|
120,961 |
(13) |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
1.4% |
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of |
|
|
|
|
Intermountain |
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Non-Voting Common |
|
Intermountain |
|
|
Stock Beneficially |
|
Non-Voting |
Beneficial Owner(1) |
|
Owned |
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
Andre Agassi
|
|
|
24,015 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
Dipak K. Desai, M.D.
|
|
|
32,331 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
Maloof Companies
|
|
|
14,910 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
James E. Rogers
|
|
|
109,187 |
(10) |
|
|
60.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The business address of each of the executive officers and
directors is 777 N. Rainbow Boulevard, Las Vegas,
Nevada 89107, Telephone: (702) 310-4000. |
|
|
(2) |
Includes number of Intermountain voting and non-voting common
stock. Assumes 100% stock election by each individual and 60%
stock election by all Intermountain stockholders on an aggregate
basis. |
|
|
(3) |
Includes 118,519 shares held by Fertitta Enterprises, of
which Mr. Bullard is Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
(4) |
Includes 22,601 shares held by Dr. Desai directly,
77,401 shares held in the name of the Hari Om Family
Partnership, an entity controlled by Dr. Desai,
12,000 shares held in the name of Ravi Patel, Uniform Trust
for Minors Act, of which Dr. Desai is a trustee, and
10,200 shares held in the name of Lina Multani. Does not
include 18,289 and 14,042 shares of non-voting common stock
held by Dr. Desai and the Hari Om Family Partnership,
respectively. |
|
|
(5) |
Includes 16,268 shares held by Mr. Herbst,
16,265 shares held by Edward Herbst, Mr. Herbsts
brother and 16,265 shares held by Troy Herbst,
Mr. Herbsts brother. |
|
|
(6) |
Includes 2,114 shares held by Mr. King directly, and
38,200 shares held by R&R Partners, of which
Mr. King is an affiliate. |
|
|
(7) |
Includes 63 shares held by Mr. Thomas Land directly
and 114,023 shares held by the Maloof companies, of which
Mr. Land is the Chief Financial Officer. Does not include
14,910 shares of non-voting common stock held by the Maloof
companies. |
|
|
(8) |
Includes 3,367 shares held by Mr. Luce directly, and
48,802 shares held by The Walters Group, of which
Mr. Luce is President. |
|
|
(9) |
Includes 3,600 shares which may be acquired pursuant to the
exercise of options under the Intermountain option plan. Options
to acquire 3,600 shares at $17 per share expire on
December 16, 2013. Percentage calculation assumes all
3,600 shares acquired upon exercise of the options. |
|
|
(10) |
Includes 4,689 shares of voting common stock held by
Mr. James Rogers directly, and 101,848 shares of
voting common stock held in the name of Sunbelt Communications
Co., a corporation controlled by Mr. Rogers. Includes
4,885 shares held by Cheryl Purdue as custodian for Maren
Renee Plant, under the California Transfers to Minors Act. Maren
Renee Plant is Mr. Rogers granddaughter. Does not
include 109,187 shares of non-voting common stock held by
Sunbelt Communications Co. Also, the shares beneficially owned
by Mr. Perry Rogers are attributable to James E. Rogers for
the purposes of the Change in Bank Control Act of 1978, as
amended, and are attributable to Sunbelt Communications Co. for
the purposes of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as
amended. See footnote (11). |
|
(11) |
Includes 4,182 shares held by Mr. Perry Rogers
directly, and 5,577 shares held by Mr. Perry Rogers as
trustee for his daughter Hanna Rogers. Also, under the Change in
Bank Control Act of 1978, as amended, the 4,531 shares
directly owned by James E. Rogers, the 98,418 shares owned
by Sunbelt Communications Co., a company controlled by
Mr. James E. Rogers, and the 4,885 shares held by
Cheryl Purdue as custodian for Maren Renee Plant are
attributable to Mr. Perry Rogers. See footnote (10). |
|
(12) |
Includes shares (and shares acquirable upon exercise of options)
owned by the current members of the regular board and the
executive officers, as a group. |
|
(13) |
Includes 102,333 held by Mr. Agassi and 18,628 shares
owned by Phil Agassi, Mr. Agassis brother, which
under the Change in Bank control Act of 1978, as amended, are
attributable to Mr. Agassi. Does not include
24,015 shares of non-voting common stock held by
Mr. Andre Agassi. |
131
DESCRIPTION OF WESTERN ALLIANCE CAPITAL STOCK
The following description sets forth the general terms and
provisions of the capital stock of Western Alliance. The
statements below describing these securities do not purport to
be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to
the applicable provisions in the amended and restated bylaws and
the amended and restated articles of incorporation. Copies of
our amended and restated bylaws and amended and restated
articles of incorporation are referenced as exhibits to the
registration statement which this proxy statement/ prospectus is
a part.
General
The articles of incorporation of Western Alliance authorize up
to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value
$.0001 per share, and 20,000,000 shares of serial
preferred stock, par value $.0001 per share. As of
December 31, 2005, there were 22,810,491 shares of
common stock outstanding and 300 stockholders of record; no
shares of preferred stock are outstanding. In addition, as of
December 31, 2005, there were options to purchase
2,124,794 shares and warrants to purchase
1,375,745 shares of common stock outstanding.
Common Stock
Voting Rights. The holders of our common stock are
entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all
matters properly submitted to a vote of the stockholders,
including the election of directors. Holders of common stock do
not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors.
Accordingly, the holders of a majority of the shares of common
stock entitled to vote in any election of directors can elect
all of the directors standing for election, if they so choose.
Dividends. Subject to preferences that may be applicable
to any then outstanding preferred stock, holders of common stock
are entitled to receive ratably those dividends, if any, as may
be declared by the board of directors out of legally available
funds.
Liquidation, Dissolution and Winding Up. Upon our
liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of common
stock will be entitled to share ratably in the net assets
legally available for distribution to stockholders after the
payment of all our debts and other liabilities, subject to the
prior rights of any preferred stock then outstanding.
Preemptive Rights. Holders of common stock have no
preemptive rights or conversion rights or other subscription
rights and there are no redemption or sinking funds provisions
applicable to the common stock.
Assessment. All outstanding shares of common stock are,
and the common stock to be outstanding upon completion of this
offering will be, fully paid and nonassessable.
Preferred Stock
No shares of preferred stock are issued and outstanding, and we
have no current intent to issue preferred stock in the immediate
future. The board of directors will have the authority, without
further action by the stockholders, to issue from time to time
the undesignated preferred stock in one or more series and to
fix the number of shares, designations, preferences, powers, and
relative, participating, optional or other special rights and
the qualifications or restrictions thereof. The preferences,
powers, rights and restrictions of different series of preferred
stock may differ with respect to dividend rates, amounts payable
on liquidation, voting rights, conversion rights, redemption
provisions, sinking fund provisions, and purchase funds and
other matters. The issuance of preferred stock could decrease
the amount of earnings and assets available for distribution to
holders of common stock or adversely affect the rights and
powers, including voting rights, of the holders of common stock,
and may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a
change in control of our company.
132
Warrants
As of December 31, 2005, there were warrants outstanding to
purchase 1,375,745 shares of common stock, at a per share
exercise price of $7.62, all of which are exercisable. The
warrants expire on June 12, 2010.
Anti-Takeover Effects of Provisions of our Articles of
Incorporation and Bylaws and Nevada Law
Some provisions of Nevada law and our articles of incorporation
and bylaws contain provisions that could make the following
transactions more difficult: (i) acquisition of us by means
of a tender offer; (ii) acquisition of us by means of a
proxy contest or otherwise; or (iii) removal of our
incumbent officers and directors. These provisions, summarized
below, are intended to encourage persons seeking to acquire
control of us to first negotiate with our board of directors.
These provisions also serve to discourage hostile takeover
practices and inadequate takeover bids. We believe that these
provisions are beneficial because the negotiation they encourage
could result in improved terms of any unsolicited proposal.
Undesignated Preferred Stock. Our board of directors has
the ability to authorize undesignated preferred stock, which
allows the board of directors to issue preferred stock with
voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the
success of any unsolicited attempt to change control of our
company. This ability may have the effect of deferring hostile
takeovers or delaying changes in control or management of our
company.
Stockholder Meetings. Our bylaws provide that a special
meeting of stockholders may be called only by our chairman of
the board or by our board of directors.
No Stockholder Action by Written Consent. Our articles of
incorporation do not permit stockholders to act by written
consent in lieu of a meeting.
Election and Removal of Directors. Our board of directors
is divided into three classes. The directors in each class will
serve for a three-year term, with one class being elected each
year by our stockholders. Once elected, directors may be removed
only by the affirmative vote of at least 80% of our outstanding
common stock. For more information on the classified board, see
the section entitled Management Board of
Composition. This system of electing and removing
directors may tend to discourage a third party from making a
tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us
because it generally makes it more difficult for stockholders to
replace a majority of the directors.
Amendment of Certain Provisions in Our Organizational
Documents. The amendment of any of the above provisions
contained in our articles of incorporation would require the
approval by holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding
shares of each class entitled to vote as a separate class on
such matters. The amendment of any of the above provisions
contained in our bylaws would require the approval by holders of
at least 80% of the voting power of the issued and outstanding
shares of capital stock.
Nevada Anti-Takeover Statute. We are subject to
Sections 78.411 through 78.444 of the Nevada Revised
Statues which prohibits persons deemed interested
stockholders from engaging in a business
combination with a Nevada corporation for three years
following the date these persons become interested stockholders.
Generally, an interested stockholder is a person
who, together with affiliates and associates, owns, or within
three years prior to the determination of interested stockholder
status did own, 10% or more of a corporations voting
stock. Generally, a business combination includes a
merger, asset or stock sale, or other transaction resulting in a
financial benefit to the interested stockholder. The existence
of this provision may have an anti-takeover effect with respect
to transactions not approved in advance by the board of
directors.
We are also subject to Sections 78.378 through 78.3793 of
the Nevada Revised Statutes, commonly referred to as the
control share law, so long as we have 200 or more
shareholders of record, at least 100 of whom are in Nevada. The
control share law provides, among other things, that a person
(individually or in association with others) who acquires a
controlling interest (which, under the definition in
the control share law, can be as small as 20% of the voting
power in the election of directors) in a corporation will obtain
voting rights in the control shares only to the
extent such rights are conferred by a vote of the disinterested
133
shareholders. In addition, in certain cases where the acquiring
party has obtained such shareholder approval for voting rights,
shareholders who voted against conferring such voting rights
will be entitled to demand payment by the corporation of the
fair value of their shares.
The Nevada Revised Statutes further allow our board of directors
to consider factors other than offering price in deciding upon
whether to reject or approve a tender offer or proposed merger
or similar transaction. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
the effect on employees, suppliers and customers; |
|
|
|
the economy of Nevada and the nation; |
|
|
|
the effect on the communities in which offices of the
corporation are located; and |
|
|
|
the long-term as well as short-term interests of the corporation
and its stockholders, including the possibility that these
interests may be better served by continued independence. |
Our articles of incorporation allow our board of directors to
consider several economic factors, as well as the factors stated
above, in considering whether to reject or approve a tender
offer or proposed merger or similar transaction.
The provisions of Nevada law and our articles of incorporation
and bylaws could have the effect of discouraging others from
attempting hostile takeovers and, as a consequence, they may
also inhibit temporary fluctuations in the market price of our
common stock that often result from actual or rumored hostile
takeover attempts. Such provisions may also have the effect of
preventing changes in our management. It is possible that these
provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish
transactions which shareholders may otherwise deem to be in
their best interests.
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification
We have adopted provisions in our articles of incorporation that
limit the liability of our directors for monetary damages for
breach of their fiduciary duties, except for liability that
cannot be eliminated under Nevada law. Nevada law provides that
directors of a corporation will not be personally liable for
monetary damages to the corporation, stockholders or creditors
for breach of their fiduciary duties as directors, except
liability for any of the following: (i) any breach of their
fiduciary duties that involve intentional misconduct, fraud or a
knowing violation of law or (ii) unlawful payments of
dividends in violation of Nevada Revised Statute
§ 78.300.
Our bylaws also provide that we will indemnify each of our
directors and executive officers and we may indemnify each of
our other officers and employees and other agents to the fullest
extent permitted by law, provided such person acted in good
faith and in a manner which he or she reasonably believed to be
in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company, and with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable
cause to believe his or conduct was unlawful. Our bylaws also
permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer,
director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out
of his or her actions in such capacity, regardless of whether
our bylaws would permit indemnification.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, 59 Maiden
Lane, Plaza Level, New York, NY 10038, telephone:
(800) 937-5449 is our transfer agent and registrar.
134
COMPARISON OF SHAREHOLDERS RIGHTS
The following is a summary of the material differences between
the rights of shareholders of Western Alliance and the rights of
shareholders of Intermountain. These differences arise primarily
from the differences between the corporate bylaws of the two
companies. The following information is a summary and does not
purport to be complete. For more complete information, you
should read each of the Articles of Incorporation of Western
Alliance and Intermountain. To find out where you can obtain
these documents, see Where You Can Find More
Information.
General
The following summary sets forth the material differences
between the rights of shareholders of Western Alliance and the
rights of shareholders of Intermountain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Alliance |
|
Intermountain |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder Action by Written Consent |
|
Shareholders may not act by written consent in lieu of a meeting. |
|
Shareholders may act without a meeting by written consent of the
holders of a majority in interest of the voting power of the
company. |
|
Types of Shares |
|
There is currently only one class of capital stock, common
stock; the board of directors has the authority, without further
action by the shareholders, to issue preferred stock. |
|
There are four series of common stock: Voting Common Stock,
Non-Voting Common Stock, Series A Voting Common Stock, and
Series A Non-Voting Common Stock. The Series A Voting
and Non-Voting Stock include a non-detachable right, exercisable
upon notice by the company, to purchase additional shares of
common stock.
In addition, the company is authorized to issue from time to
time additional shares, the class, number of shares,
designation, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of
which will be determined by the board of directors. |
|
Special Shareholder Meetings |
|
A special meeting of shareholders may be called only by the
chairman of the board or by the board of directors. |
|
A special meeting of shareholders may be called by the chairman
of the board, by the board of directors, or by any one or more
shareholders owning in the aggregate not less than 25% of the
voting stock of the company. |
|
Undesignated Preferred Stock |
|
No shares of preferred stock are issued and outstanding, and
there is no current intent to issue preferred stock in the
immediate future. The board of directors has the authority,
without further |
|
No shares of preferred stock are issued and outstanding. The
company is authorized to issue from time to time additional
shares, the class, number of shares, designation, rights, |
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Alliance |
|
Intermountain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
action by the stockholders, to issue from time to time the
undesignated preferred stock in one or more series and to fix
the number of shares, designations, preferences, powers, and
relative, participating, optional or other special rights and
the qualifications or restrictions thereof. |
|
preferences, privileges and restrictions of which will be
determined by the board of directors. |
|
Amendment of Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws |
|
Amendment of the articles of incorporation requires the approval
by holders of at least two thirds of the outstanding shares of
each class entitled to vote as a separate class on such
matters.
Amendment of the bylaws requires the approval by holders of at
least 80% of the voting power of the issued and outstanding
shares of capital stock. |
|
The articles of incorporation may be amended to the extent and
in the manner prescribed by the laws of the State of Nevada.
The bylaws may be amended by the vote or written consent of
shareholders entitled to exercise a majority of the voting power
of the company. Subject to this right, the bylaws may be amended
by the board of directors. |
|
Share Warrants |
|
As of December 31, 2005, there were warrants outstanding to
purchase 1,160,672 shares of common stock, at a per
share exercise price of $7.62, all of which are exercisable. The
warrants expire on June 12, 2010. |
|
There are currently no warrants outstanding. |
|
Anti-Takeover Provisions |
|
Board of directors has the authority to issue
undesignated preferred stock.
Special meetings of shareholders may be called only
by the chairman of the board or by the board of directors.
Shareholders may not act by written consent in lieu
of a meeting.
The board of directors is divided into three
classes, with one class being elected each year by the
shareholders. Once elected, directors may be removed only by the
affirmative vote of at least 80% of the outstanding common stock. |
|
Board of directors has the authority to issue
undesignated preferred stock.
Directors may be removed only by vote of at
least2/3
(two- thirds) of the issued and outstanding voting shares of the
company at a meeting of the shareholders or by unanimous written
consent. |
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Alliance |
|
Intermountain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment of the articles of incorporation requires
the approval by holders of at least two-thirds of the
outstanding shares of each class entitled to vote as a separate
class on such matters.
Amendment of the bylaws requires the approval by
holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the issued and
outstanding shares of capital stock. |
|
|
MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
Market Prices
Western Alliance common stock is listed on the NYSE under the
symbol WAL. No established trading market exists for
Intermountain common stock and, to the knowledge of
Intermountains management, no purchases or sales of
Intermountain common stock have occurred since March 1,
2006.
The following table sets forth the high and low trading prices
of shares of Western Alliance common stock as reported on the
NYSE for the periods indicated since its initial public offering
in June, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price ($) |
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
31.50 |
|
|
|
25.75 |
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
30.01 |
|
|
|
24.39 |
|
On December 29, 2005, the last trading day before the
execution of the merger agreement, the closing price of Western
Alliances common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was
$29.40. On March 1, 2006 the most recent practicable date
before the printing of this document, the closing price of
Western Alliances common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange was $36.01.
You are advised to obtain current market quotations for Western
Alliance common stock. The market price of Western Alliance
common stock will fluctuate between the date of this joint proxy
statement/ prospectus and the completion of the merger. No
assurance can be given concerning the market price of Western
Alliance common stock.
Dividends
Neither Western Alliance nor Intermountain paid any cash
dividends in 2004 and 2005.
Western Alliance has never paid a cash dividend on its common
stock and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the
foreseeable future. Western Alliance presently anticipates
continuing the policy of retaining earnings to fund growth for
the foreseeable future.
Western Alliance is a legal entity separate and distinct from
its subsidiary banks and its other non-bank subsidiaries. As a
holding company with no significant assets other than the
capital stock of subsidiaries, it depends upon dividends from
its subsidiaries for a substantial part of its revenue.
Accordingly, the ability to pay dividends depends primarily upon
the receipt of dividends or other capital distributions from its
subsidiaries. The subsidiaries ability to pay dividends to
Western Alliance is subject to, among other things,
137
their earnings, financial condition and need for funds, as well
as applicable federal and state governmental policies and
regulations, which may limit the amount that may be paid as
dividends without prior approval. See Supervision and
Regulation for information regarding the ability of
Western Alliance to pay cash dividends.
Intermountain has never paid a cash dividend and does not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Western Alliance is required to file annual, quarterly and
special reports, proxy statements and other information with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, respectively. You may read and copy any
reports, statements or other information that Western Alliance
files with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC
maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and
information statements and other information about issuers that
file electronically with the SEC. The address of the SECs
Internet site is http://www.sec.gov. Western Alliance can
be found on the internet at
http://www.westernalliance.com. You may read any reports,
statements or other information that Western Alliance files with
the FDIC at the FDICs Public Information Center (please
call the FDIC at
1-800-276-6003 for
information about obtaining this information). Western
Alliances common stock is traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the trading symbol WAL.
Western Alliance has filed with the SEC a registration statement
on Form S-4 under
the Securities Act relating to Western Alliances common
stock to be issued to Intermountains shareholders in the
merger. As permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC,
this proxy statement/ prospectus does not contain all the
information set forth in the registration statement. You can
obtain that additional information from the SECs principal
office in Washington, D.C. or the SECs internet site
as described above. Statements contained in this proxy
statement/ prospectus or in any document incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus about the
contents of any contract or other document are not necessarily
complete and, in each instance where the contract or document is
filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, reference is
made to the copy of that contract or document filed as an
exhibit to the registration statement, with each statement of
that kind in this proxy statement/ prospectus being qualified in
all respects by reference to the document.
WESTERN ALLIANCE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Any proposal which a Western Alliance shareholder wishes to have
included in Western Alliances proxy statement and form of
proxy relating to Western Alliances 2006 annual meeting of
shareholders must be received by Western Alliance at its
principal executive offices at 2700 West Sahara Avenue, Las
Vegas, Nevada 89102, no later than December 29, 2005. All
shareholder proposals must comply with Nevada law and will be
subject to
Rule 14a-8 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
INTERMOUNTAIN SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Intermountain intends to hold a 2006 annual meeting of
Shareholders only if the merger agreement is terminated. Any
proposal which an Intermountain shareholder wishes to have
included in Intermountains proxy statement and form of
proxy relating to Intermountains 2006 annual meeting of
shareholders should be received by Intermountain at its
principal executive offices at 777 N. Rainbow
Boulevard, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107, within a reasonable time
before Intermountain begins to print and mail its proxy
solicitation materials for the annual meeting. If a shareholder
wishes to present a matter at Intermountains 2006 annual
meeting that is outside the process for inclusion in the proxy
statement, and if the matter relates to the nomination of
directors, Intermountains bylaws provide that notice must
be given (i) not fewer than 21 calendar days nor more
than 60 calendar days prior to such annual meeting date or
(ii) if fewer than 21 calendar days notice of
the meeting is given, not later than the close of business on
the tenth day following the day on which notice
138
was mailed. If a shareholder wishes to present a matter which is
outside the process for inclusion in the proxy statement and is
not for the nomination of directors, notice should be given to
the Secretary of Intermountain not later than the close of
business on the tenth day following the day on which notice was
mailed. All shareholder proposals must comply with
Intermountains bylaws and Nevada law. If the merger
agreement is approved and the merger takes place, Intermountain
will not have an annual meeting of shareholders in 2006 or
subsequent years.
OTHER MATTERS
We do not expect that any matters other than those described in
this document will be brought before the special meeting. If any
other matters are presented, however, it is the intention of the
persons named in the Intermountain proxy card to vote proxies in
accordance with the determination of a majority of
Intermountains Board of Directors, including, without
limitation, a motion to adjourn or postpone the special meeting
to another time and/or place for the purpose of soliciting
additional proxies in order to approve the merger agreement or
otherwise.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Western Alliance for
the three years ending December 31, 2004 included in this
proxy statement/ prospectus have been audited by
McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, to the extent and for the periods set forth in
their report, and are included in reliance upon such report
given upon the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and
accounting.
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTING FIRM
A representative of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP will be
present at the Intermountain special meeting. The representative
will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of Western Alliances common stock to be
issued in the merger has been passed upon by Hogan &
Hartson L.L.P., Washington, D.C. Certain federal income tax
matters described herein will be passed upon by Hogan &
Hartson L.L.P., New York, New York.
139
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WESTERN
ALLIANCE
|
|
|
|
|
Audited:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
Unaudited:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-35 |
|
|
|
|
F-36 |
|
|
|
|
F-37 |
|
|
|
|
F-38 |
|
|
|
|
F-39 |
|
F-1
McGladrey & Pullen
Certified Public Accountants
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors
Western Alliance Bancorporation
Las Vegas, Nevada
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Western Alliance Bancorporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders equity and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Western Alliance Bancorporation and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
|
|
|
/s/ McGladrey &
Pullen, llp
|
|
|
McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP |
Las Vegas, Nevada
February 11, 2005
F-2
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands, except per | |
|
|
share amounts) | |
ASSETS |
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$ |
92,282 |
|
|
$ |
61,893 |
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
23,115 |
|
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
115,397 |
|
|
|
65,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity (approximate fair value $128,984 and
$131,572, respectively)
|
|
|
129,549 |
|
|
|
132,294 |
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
659,073 |
|
|
|
583,684 |
|
Gross loans, including net deferred loan fees
|
|
|
1,188,535 |
|
|
|
733,078 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(15,271 |
) |
|
|
(11,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
1,173,264 |
|
|
|
721,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
29,364 |
|
|
|
18,038 |
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
26,170 |
|
|
|
24,967 |
|
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
15,097 |
|
|
|
12,628 |
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
8,359 |
|
|
|
6,389 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
5,949 |
|
|
|
4,778 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $183
and $0, respectively
|
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
9,241 |
|
|
|
5,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,176,849 |
|
|
$ |
1,576,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
$ |
749,550 |
|
|
$ |
441,160 |
|
|
Interest bearing deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand
|
|
|
103,723 |
|
|
|
61,797 |
|
|
|
Savings and money market
|
|
|
665,425 |
|
|
|
415,308 |
|
|
|
Time, $100 and over
|
|
|
219,451 |
|
|
|
160,397 |
|
|
|
Other time
|
|
|
17,887 |
|
|
|
15,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,756,036 |
|
|
|
1,094,646 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less
|
|
|
185,494 |
|
|
|
241,261 |
|
|
|
Over one year
|
|
|
63,700 |
|
|
|
97,400 |
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
Due to broker for pending investment purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,750 |
|
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
7,120 |
|
|
|
5,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,043,278 |
|
|
|
1,479,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.0001; shares authorized 50,000,000;
shares issued and outstanding 2004: 18,249,554; 2003:16,681,273
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
80,459 |
|
|
|
62,533 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
58,216 |
|
|
|
38,159 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss net unrealized
loss on available for sale securities
|
|
|
(5,106 |
) |
|
|
(3,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
133,571 |
|
|
|
97,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
2,176,849 |
|
|
$ |
1,576,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands, except per | |
|
|
share amounts) | |
Interest income on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees
|
|
$ |
59,311 |
|
|
$ |
36,792 |
|
|
$ |
31,290 |
|
|
Securities taxable
|
|
|
30,373 |
|
|
|
15,938 |
|
|
|
6,616 |
|
|
Securities nontaxable
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
Dividends taxable
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Federal funds sold and other
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
90,855 |
|
|
|
53,823 |
|
|
|
39,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
12,123 |
|
|
|
8,158 |
|
|
|
7,394 |
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings,
short-term
|
|
|
4,472 |
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings,
long-term
|
|
|
1,586 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
19,720 |
|
|
|
12,798 |
|
|
|
9,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
71,135 |
|
|
|
41,025 |
|
|
|
29,346 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
5,145 |
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
67,221 |
|
|
|
35,880 |
|
|
|
27,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and investment advisory services
|
|
|
2,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
Income from bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loan pre-underwriting fees
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
Investment securities gains (losses), net
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
609 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,726 |
|
|
|
4,270 |
|
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
25,590 |
|
|
|
15,615 |
|
|
|
9,921 |
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
7,309 |
|
|
|
4,820 |
|
|
|
3,794 |
|
|
Customer service
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
Advertising, public relations and business development
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
Legal, professional and director fees
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
Correspondent banking service charges and wire transfer costs
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
Audits and exams
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
Travel and automobile
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
Organizational costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,929 |
|
|
|
27,290 |
|
|
|
19,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
31,018 |
|
|
|
12,860 |
|
|
|
12,644 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
10,961 |
|
|
|
4,171 |
|
|
|
4,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
20,057 |
|
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
|
$ |
8,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive | |
|
| |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Treasury | |
|
Retained | |
|
Income | |
|
|
Description |
|
Income | |
|
Shares Issued | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
Stock | |
|
Earnings | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Balance, December 31, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,616,929 |
|
|
$ |
3,617 |
|
|
$ |
10,621 |
|
|
$ |
(2,372 |
) |
|
$ |
24,111 |
|
|
$ |
(114 |
) |
|
$ |
35,863 |
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,798 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
Effect of three-for-one stock split
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,269,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of change in par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,634 |
) |
|
|
3,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 3,004,098 shares of common stock at
$7.03 per share and 1,502,049 stock warrants at
$.59 per warrant, net of offering costs of $636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,004,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,363 |
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
8,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,409 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities available for sale
arising during the period, net of taxes of $1,090
|
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net
income, net of taxes of $207
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains
|
|
|
1,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,714 |
|
|
|
1,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,908,279 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
35,693 |
|
|
|
(2,372 |
) |
|
|
32,520 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
67,442 |
|
Stock options exercised, including tax benefit of $256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434 |
|
Issuance of 711,310 shares of common stock $7.03 per
share, net of offering costs of $116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
711,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,884 |
|
Issuance of 2,297,560 shares of common stock at $9 per
share, net of offering costs of $55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,297,560 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
20,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,623 |
|
Issuance of 100,000 shares of common stock at $9 per
share in connection with merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900 |
|
Treasury stock purchased at $9 per share
(75,338 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(678 |
) |
Retirement of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(443,918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
(3,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,689 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses on securities available for sale
arising during the period, net of taxes of $2,602
|
|
|
(5,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less reclassification adjustment for losses included in net
income, net of taxes of $90
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding losses
|
|
|
(4,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,843 |
) |
|
|
(4,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,681,273 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
62,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,159 |
|
|
|
(3,243 |
) |
|
|
97,451 |
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415 |
|
Stock warrants exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
Issuance of 1,250,000 shares of common stock at
$12 per share, net of offering costs of $45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,955 |
|
Issuance of 200,000 shares of common stock at $12 per
share, in connection with merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
20,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,057 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses on securities available for sale
arising during the period, net of taxes of $1,096
|
|
|
(1,850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net
income, net of taxes of $6
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding losses
|
|
|
(1,863 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,863 |
) |
|
|
(1,863 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,249,554 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
80,459 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
58,216 |
|
|
$ |
(5,106 |
) |
|
$ |
133,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
20,057 |
|
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
|
$ |
8,409 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,629 |
|
|
|
1,804 |
|
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
Net amortization of securities premiums
|
|
|
3,698 |
|
|
|
2,937 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock dividends received, FHLB stock
|
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
5,145 |
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(1,470 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(Increase) in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
(1,970 |
) |
|
|
(2,811 |
) |
|
|
(1,316 |
) |
|
|
(Increase) in bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
(1,203 |
) |
|
|
(967 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) in other assets
|
|
|
(844 |
) |
|
|
(2,732 |
) |
|
|
(1,234 |
) |
|
|
Increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
(637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
27,274 |
|
|
|
12,696 |
|
|
|
10,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of securities held to maturity
|
|
|
(32,706 |
) |
|
|
(121,192 |
) |
|
|
(4,044 |
) |
|
Proceeds from maturities of securities held to maturity
|
|
|
35,241 |
|
|
|
11,416 |
|
|
|
4,492 |
|
|
Purchases of securities available for sale
|
|
|
(441,986 |
) |
|
|
(506,246 |
) |
|
|
(249,777 |
) |
|
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale
|
|
|
305,908 |
|
|
|
102,051 |
|
|
|
28,714 |
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale
|
|
|
41,775 |
|
|
|
30,051 |
|
|
|
69,117 |
|
|
Net cash (paid) received in settlement of acquisition
|
|
|
(2,177 |
) |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
(1,933 |
) |
|
|
(10,908 |
) |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
Net increase in loans made to customers
|
|
|
(455,457 |
) |
|
|
(268,828 |
) |
|
|
(57,997 |
) |
|
Purchase of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(13,899 |
) |
|
|
(7,071 |
) |
|
|
(1,605 |
) |
|
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(565,234 |
) |
|
|
(794,481 |
) |
|
|
(211,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits
|
|
|
661,390 |
|
|
|
374,342 |
|
|
|
170,950 |
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
Net (repayments) proceeds from borrowings
|
|
|
(89,467 |
) |
|
|
288,661 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and stock warrants
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
Proceeds from stock issuance
|
|
|
14,955 |
|
|
|
25,507 |
|
|
|
21,364 |
|
|
Repurchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
587,449 |
|
|
|
688,010 |
|
|
|
257,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
49,489 |
|
|
|
(93,775 |
) |
|
|
55,582 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
65,908 |
|
|
|
159,683 |
|
|
|
104,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of year
|
|
$ |
115,397 |
|
|
$ |
65,908 |
|
|
$ |
159,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments for interest
|
|
$ |
19,601 |
|
|
$ |
11,675 |
|
|
$ |
9,391 |
|
|
Cash payments for income taxes
|
|
$ |
10,129 |
|
|
$ |
4,855 |
|
|
$ |
4,416 |
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing and Financing
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued in connection with acquisitions (Note 2)
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Securities transferred from available for sale to held to
maturity
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,862 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Purchase of available for sale securities pending settlement
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,750 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Retirement of treasury stock
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,050 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Note 1. |
Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies |
Western Alliance Bancorporation is a bank holding company
providing a full range of banking services to commercial and
consumer customers through its wholly owned subsidiaries
BankWest of Nevada, operating primarily in Nevada, Alliance Bank
of Arizona, operating primarily in Arizona, Torrey Pines Bank,
operating primarily in Southern California, Miller/
Russell & Associates, Inc., operating in Nevada,
Arizona and Southern California, and Premier Trust, Inc.,
operating in Nevada and Arizona. These entities are collectively
referred to herein as the Company. Alliance Bank of Arizona and
Torrey Pines Bank began operations during the year ended
December 31, 2003. The accounting and reporting policies of
the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America and general industry practices.
A summary of the significant accounting policies of the Company
follows:
|
|
|
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial
statements |
The preparation of financial statements requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. A
material estimate that is particularly susceptible to
significant change in the near term relates to the determination
of the allowance for loan losses.
|
|
|
Principles of consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, BankWest of
Nevada, Alliance Bank of Arizona, Torrey Pines Bank
(collectively referred to herein as the Banks), Miller/
Russell & Associates, Inc., and Premier Trust, Inc. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. As of January 1, 2004, the
Company has deconsolidated its 100% ownership interest in
the following trusts: BankWest Nevada Capital Trust I and
BankWest Nevada Capital Trust II. These trusts have been
de-consolidated as of December 31, 2003 as reflected in
these statements for comparative purposes. There was no impact
on previously reported stockholders equity or net income
as a result of this
de-consolidation
pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents
include cash on hand, amounts due from banks (including cash
items in process of clearing) and federal funds sold. Cash flows
from loans originated by the Company and deposits are reported
net.
The Company maintains amounts due from banks, which at times may
exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced
any losses in such accounts.
Securities classified as held to maturity are those debt
securities the Company has both the intent and ability to hold
to maturity regardless of changes in market conditions,
liquidity needs or general economic conditions. These securities
are carried at amortized cost. The sale of a security within
three months of its maturity date or after at least 85% of the
principal outstanding has been collected is considered a
maturity for purposes of classification and disclosure.
F-7
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
Securities classified as available for sale are equity
securities and those debt securities the Company intends to hold
for an indefinite period of time, but not necessarily to
maturity. Any decision to sell a security classified as
available for sale would be based on various factors, including
significant movements in interest rates, changes in the maturity
mix of the Companys assets and liabilities, liquidity
needs, regulatory capital considerations and other similar
factors. Securities available for sale are reported at fair
value with unrealized gains or losses reported as other
comprehensive income (loss), net of the related deferred tax
effect. Realized gains or losses, determined on the basis of the
cost of specific securities sold, are included in earnings.
Purchase premiums and discounts are generally recognized in
interest income using the interest method over the term of the
securities. For mortgage-backed securities, estimates of
prepayments are considered in the constant yield calculations.
Declines in the fair value of individual securities classified
as available for sale below their amortized cost that are
determined to be other than temporary result in write-downs of
the individual securities to their fair value with the result in
write-downs included in current earnings as realized losses. In
determining other-than-temporary losses, management considers
(1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair
value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition
and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent
and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the
issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any
anticipated recovery in fair value.
Loans are stated at the amount of unpaid principal, reduced by
unearned net loan fees and allowance for loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision
for loan losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against
the allowance for loan losses when management believes that
collectibility of the principal is unlikely. Subsequent
recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
The allowance is an amount that management believes will be
adequate to absorb probable losses on existing loans that may
become uncollectible, based on evaluation of the collectibility
of loans and prior credit loss experience. This evaluation also
takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature
and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality,
review of specific problem credits, peer bank information, and
current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers
ability to pay. Due to the credit concentration of the
Companys loan portfolio in real estate secured loans, the
value of collateral is heavily dependent on real estate values
in Southern Nevada, Arizona and Southern California. While
management uses the best information available to make its
evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary
if there are significant changes in economic or other
conditions. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC) and state banking regulatory agencies,
as an integral part of their examination processes, periodically
review the Banks allowance for loan losses, and may
require the Banks to make additions to the allowance based on
their judgment about information available to them at the time
of their examinations.
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The
specific component relates to loans that are classified as
either doubtful, substandard or special mention. For such loans
that are also classified as impaired, an allowance is
established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value
or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than
the carrying value of that loan, pursuant to FASB Statement
No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a
Loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and
is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative
and environmental factors, pursuant to FASB Statement No. 5
(FASB 5), Accounting for Contingencies.
A loan is impaired when it is probable the Company will be
unable to collect all contractual principal and interest
payments due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement.
Impaired loans are measured based
F-8
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at
the loans effective interest rate or, as a practical
expedient, at the loans observable market price or the
fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral
dependent. The amount of impairment, if any, and any subsequent
changes are included in the allowance for loan losses.
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
Interest on loans is recognized over the terms of the loans and
is calculated under the effective interest method. The accrual
of interest on impaired loans is discontinued when, in
managements opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet
payments as they become due.
The Company determines a loan to be delinquent when payments
have not been made according to contractual terms, typically
evidenced by nonpayment of a monthly installment by the due
date. The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued at the
time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the credit is
well secured and in the process of collection. Credit card loans
and other personal loans are typically charged off no later than
180 days delinquent.
All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed
on nonaccrual status or charged off is reversed against interest
income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the
cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return
to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the
principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought
current and future payments are reasonably assured.
Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan
origination costs are deferred and the net amount amortized as
an adjustment to the related loans yield. The Company is
generally amortizing these amounts over the contractual life of
the loan. Commitment fees, based upon a percentage of a
customers unused line of credit, and fees related to
standby letters of credit are recognized over the commitment
period.
As a service for customers, the Company has entered into
agreements with unaffiliated mortgage companies to complete
applications, loan documents and perform pre-underwriting
activities for certain residential mortgages. The mortgage loan
pre-underwriting fees from these agreements are recognized as
income when earned.
|
|
|
Transfers of financial assets |
Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when
control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over
transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the
assets have been isolated from the Company, (2) the
transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain
it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange
the transferred assets, and (3) the Company does not
maintain effective control over the transferred assets through
an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.
|
|
|
Bank owned life insurance |
Bank owned life insurance is stated at its cash surrender value.
The face amount of the underlying policies is $69,777 as of
December 31, 2004. There are no loans offset against cash
surrender values, and there are no restrictions as to the use of
proceeds.
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
The Companys banks, as members of the Federal Home
Loan Bank (FHLB) system, are required to maintain an
investment in capital stock of the FHLB in an amount equal to 5%
of its advances from the
F-9
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
FHLB. These investments are recorded at cost since no ready
market exists for them, and they have no quoted market value.
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed
principally by the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets. Improvements to leased property are
amortized over the lesser of the term of the lease or life of
the improvements. Depreciation and amortization is computed
using the following estimated lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years | |
|
|
| |
Bank premises
|
|
|
31 |
|
Equipment and furniture
|
|
|
5-10 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
6-10 |
|
|
|
|
Organization and
start-up
costs |
Organization and
start-up costs were
charged to operations as they were incurred pursuant to
Statement of Position 98-5, Reporting on the Costs of
Start-Up Activities. Organization and
start-up costs charged
to operations during the years ended December 31, 2003 and
2002 were approximately $604 and $461, respectively. There were
no organization and
start-up costs charged
to operations during the year ended December 31, 2004.
Intangible assets consist of investment advisory and trust
customer relationships, respectively, and are amortized over 6
and 10 years, respectively.
Goodwill is reviewed periodically by management for impairment.
No impairment charge was deemed necessary based on
managements impairment analysis in 2004.
Deferred taxes are provided on an asset and liability method
whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible
temporary differences and tax credit carryforwards and deferred
tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary
differences. Temporary differences are the differences between
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax
bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance
when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for
the effect of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of
enactment.
At December 31, 2004, the Company has three stock-based
compensation plans, which are described more fully in
Note 12. The Company accounts for those plans under the
recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
and related interpretations. Accordingly, no stock-based
employee compensation cost has been recognized, as all options
granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the
market value of the underlying common stock on the date of
grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net income
and earnings per share had compensation cost
F-10
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
for all of the stock-based compensation plans been determined
based on the grant date fair values of awards (the method
described in FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
20,057 |
|
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
|
$ |
8,409 |
|
|
Deduct total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all awards
|
|
|
(696 |
) |
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
Related tax benefit for nonqualified stock options
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
19,394 |
|
|
$ |
8,258 |
|
|
$ |
8,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
The pro forma compensation cost was recognized for the fair
value of the stock options granted, which was estimated using
the minimum value method for stock options granted in 2004, 2003
and 2002 with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Expected life in years
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
3.58 |
% |
|
|
3.78 |
% |
Dividends rate
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
Fair value per optional share
|
|
$ |
2.84 |
|
|
$ |
1.96 |
|
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet instruments |
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has entered into
off-balance sheet financial instruments consisting of
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Such
financial instruments are recorded in the consolidated financial
statements when they are funded.
|
|
|
Trust assets and investment advisory assets under
management |
Customer property, other than funds on deposit, held in a
fiduciary or agency capacity by the Company is not included in
the consolidated balance sheet because they are not assets of
the Company. Trust and investment advisory service income is
recorded on an accrual basis. At December 31, 2004, Premier
Trust had $80,338 in assets under management and $187,486 in
total trust assets. At December 31, 2004, Miller/
Russell & Associates had $829,740 in assets under
management.
|
|
|
Fair values of financial instruments |
FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of fair value
information about financial instruments, whether or not
recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to
estimate that value.
Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value
of the Companys financial instruments; however, there are
inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for
substantially all financial instruments, the fair value
estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the
amounts the
F-11
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
Company could have realized in a sales transaction at
December 31, 2004 or 2003. The estimated fair value amounts
for 2004 and 2003 have been measured as of their year end, and
have not been reevaluated or updated for purposes of these
consolidated financial statements subsequent to those dates. As
such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments
subsequent to the reporting date may be different than the
amounts reported at year end.
The information in Note 16 should not be interpreted as an
estimate of the fair value of the entire Company since a fair
value calculation is only required for a limited portion of the
Companys assets.
Due to the wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of
subjectivity used in making the estimate, comparisons between
the Companys disclosures and those of other companies or
banks may not be meaningful.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company
in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments:
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets
for cash and due from banks and federal funds sold approximate
their fair value. |
|
|
|
Fair values for securities are based on quoted market prices
where available or on quoted markets for similar securities in
the absence of quoted prices on the specific security. |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
|
The Companys subsidiary banks are members of the Federal
Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system and maintain an
investment in capital stock of the FHLB. No ready market exists
for the FHLB stock and it has no quoted market value. |
|
|
|
For variable rate loans that reprice frequently and that have
experienced no significant change in credit risk, fair values
are based on carrying values. Variable rate loans comprised
approximately 58% and 54% of the loan portfolio at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Fair value for
all other loans is estimated based on discounted cash flows
using interest rates currently being offered for loans with
similar terms to borrowers with similar credit quality.
Prepayments prior to the repricing date are not expected to be
significant. Loans are expected to be held to maturity and any
unrealized gains or losses are not expected to be realized. |
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable and payable |
|
|
|
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets
for accrued interest receivable and payable approximate their
fair value. |
|
|
|
The fair value disclosed for demand and savings deposits is by
definition equal to the amount payable on demand at their
reporting date (that is, their carrying amount). The carrying
amount for variable-rate deposit accounts approximates their
fair value. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit
are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that
applies interest rates currently being offered on |
F-12
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly
maturities on these deposits. Substantially all of the
Companys certificates of deposit at December 31, 2004
and 2003 mature in less than one year. Early withdrawals of
fixed-rate certificates of deposit are not expected to be
significant. |
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank and other borrowings |
|
|
|
The fair values of the Companys borrowings are estimated
using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Companys
incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing
arrangements. |
|
|
|
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets
for junior subordinated debt instruments approximate their fair
value due to the variable nature of these instruments. |
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet instruments |
|
|
|
Fair values for the Companys off-balance sheet instruments
(lending commitments and standby letters of credit) are based on
quoted fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements,
taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and
the counterparties credit standing. |
Diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average
outstanding common shares during each year, including common
stock equivalents. Basic earnings per share is based on the
weighted average outstanding common shares during the year.
Basic and diluted earnings per share, based on the weighted
average outstanding shares, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock
|
|
$ |
20,057 |
|
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
|
$ |
8,409 |
|
|
Average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,189,687 |
|
|
|
14,313,611 |
|
|
|
10,677,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock
|
|
$ |
20,057 |
|
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
|
$ |
8,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,189,687 |
|
|
|
14,313,611 |
|
|
|
10,677,736 |
|
|
Stock option adjustment
|
|
|
694,801 |
|
|
|
254,021 |
|
|
|
37,712 |
|
|
Stock warrant adjustment
|
|
|
520,632 |
|
|
|
45,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
18,405,120 |
|
|
|
14,613,173 |
|
|
|
10,715,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,502,049 stock warrants are not included in the above
calculations in the fourth quarter of 2002 and the first, second
and third quarters of 2003 as the effect would have been
anti-dilutive.
Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements as of
and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 have
been reclassified to conform with the current presentation. The
reclassifications have no effect on net income or
stockholders equity as previously reported.
F-13
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Recent accounting pronouncements |
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
published FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (FAS 123(R)). FAS 123(R)
requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based
payment transactions, including grants of employee stock
options, be recognized in financial statements. That cost will
be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability
instruments issued. FAS 123(R) permits entities to use any
option-pricing model that meets the fair value objective in the
Statement. Modifications of share-based payments will be treated
as replacement awards with the cost of the incremental value
recorded in the financial statements.
The Statement will be effective for the Company at the beginning
of the first quarter of 2006. As of the effective date, the
Company will apply the Statement using a modified version of
prospective application. Under that transition method,
compensation cost will be recognized for (1) all awards
granted after the required effective date and to awards
modified, cancelled, or repurchased after that date and
(2) the portion of awards granted subsequent to completion
of an IPO and prior to the effective date for which the
requisite service has not yet been rendered, based on the
grant-date fair value of those awards calculated for pro forma
disclosures under SFAS 123.
The impact of this Statement on the Company in 2006 and beyond
will depend on various factors; among them being our future
compensation strategy. The pro forma compensation costs (in the
stock compensation plans table above) have been calculated using
a minimum value method and may not be indicative of amounts
which shall be expensed in future periods.
On September 30, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) Emerging Issues Task
Force (EITF) Issue No. 03-1-1 delaying the effective
date of paragraphs 10-20 of
EITF 03-1, The
Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application
to Certain Investments, which provides guidance for
determining the meaning of other-than-temporarily
impaired and its application to certain debt and equity
securities within the scope of SFAS No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities, and investments accounted for under the cost
method. The guidance requires that investments which have
declined in value due to credit concerns or solely due to
changes in interest rates must be recorded as
other-than-temporarily impaired unless the Company can assert
and demonstrate its intention to hold the security for a period
of time sufficient to allow for a recovery of fair value up to
or beyond the cost of the investment which might mean maturity.
The delay of the effective date of
EITF 03-1 will be
superceded concurrent with the final issuance of proposed FSP
Issue 03-1-a.
Proposed FSP
Issue 03-1-a is
intended to provide implementation guidance with respect to all
securities analyzed for impairment under paragraphs 10-20
of EITF 03-1.
Management continues to closely monitor and evaluate how the
provisions of
EITF 03-1 and
proposed FSP
Issue 03-1-a will
affect the Company.
|
|
Note 2. |
Mergers and Acquisition Activity |
On May 17, 2004, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding stock of Miller/ Russell & Associates,
Inc., in exchange for 200,000 shares of the Companys
stock, valued at $2,400, and $2,300 in cash plus direct
expenses. The value of the common stock was consistent with a
subsequent common stock offering. Goodwill recorded as a result
of the acquisition totaled $3,946. Miller/ Russell provides
investment advisory services to clients primarily in Arizona,
Southern Nevada and Southern California.
On December 30, 2003, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding stock of Premier Trust, Inc. (formerly Premier Trust
of Nevada, Inc.) in exchange for 100,000 shares of the
Companys stock, valued at $900, and $100, in cash plus
direct expenses. The value of the common stock was based on a
recent common stock offering. $673 in customer relationship
intangible assets was recorded as a result of the acquisition.
Premier Trust, Inc. provides a full range of trust services to
clients primarily in Southern Nevada and Arizona.
F-14
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the dates of
acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller/Russell | |
|
Premier Trust | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash
|
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Customer relationship intangible asset
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
5,656 |
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities assumed
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
4,807 |
|
|
$ |
1,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the $3,946 of goodwill, $1,931 is expected to be deductible
for tax purposes.
The mergers were effected to allow the Company to provide its
customers with a wider array of financial services. The results
of operations of each acquired entity are included in the
accompanying statements of operations since the respective
acquisition date.
|
|
Note 3. |
Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks |
The Company is required to maintain balances in cash or on
deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank. The total of those
reserve balances was approximately $15,555 and $4,068 as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Carrying amounts and fair values of investment securities at
December 31 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
|
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Securities held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$ |
3,501 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
3,475 |
|
Small Business Administration loan pools
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
617 |
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
|
7,290 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,754 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
118,133 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(998 |
) |
|
|
117,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
129,549 |
|
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
$ |
(1,032 |
) |
|
$ |
128,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies
|
|
$ |
118,798 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
(457 |
) |
|
$ |
118,348 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
537,382 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
(8,046 |
) |
|
|
529,967 |
|
Other
|
|
|
10,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
10,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
666,961 |
|
|
$ |
638 |
|
|
$ |
(8,526 |
) |
|
$ |
659,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
|
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Securities held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$ |
3,014 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,019 |
|
Small Business Administration loan pools
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1,142 |
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
|
7,563 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,775 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
120,575 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
(1,239 |
) |
|
|
119,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
132,294 |
|
|
$ |
521 |
|
|
$ |
(1,243 |
) |
|
$ |
131,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies
|
|
$ |
112,223 |
|
|
$ |
314 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
112,537 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
466,063 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
(5,985 |
) |
|
|
460,871 |
|
Other
|
|
|
10,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
10,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
588,615 |
|
|
$ |
1,107 |
|
|
$ |
(6,038 |
) |
|
$ |
583,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with carrying amounts of approximately $465,389 and
$410,838 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, were
pledged for various purposes as required or permitted by law.
Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized
losses at December 31, 2004, aggregated by investment
category and length of time that individual securities have been
in a continuous loss position follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than Twelve | |
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Over Twelve Months | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Securities held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
3,475 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Small Business Administration loan pools
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
84,144 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
26,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
825 |
|
|
$ |
87,924 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
26,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than Twelve | |
|
|
|
|
Months | |
|
Over Twelve Months | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies
|
|
$ |
457 |
|
|
$ |
105,589 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
4,641 |
|
|
|
359,352 |
|
|
|
3,405 |
|
|
|
99,699 |
|
Other
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
10,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,121 |
|
|
$ |
475,699 |
|
|
$ |
3,405 |
|
|
$ |
99,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2003, no investments had material
continuous losses existing greater than twelve months.
F-16
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary
impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently
when economic or market conditions warrant such evaluation.
Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the
extent to which the fair value has been less than cost,
(2) the financial condition and near term prospects of the
issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to
retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
At December 31, 2004, 94 debt securities have unrealized
losses with aggregate depreciation of approximately 1.4% from
the Companys amortized cost basis. These unrealized losses
relate primarily to fluctuations in the current interest rate
environment. In analyzing an issuers financial condition,
management considers whether the securities are issued by the
federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond
rating agencies have occurred, and industry analysis reports. As
management has the ability and intent to hold debt securities
for the foreseeable future, no declines are deemed to be other
than temporary.
The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of
December 31, 2004 by contractual maturities are shown
below. The actual maturities of the mortgage-backed securities
and Small Business Administration loan pools may differ from
their contractual maturities because the loans underlying the
securities may be repaid without any penalties. Therefore, these
securities are listed separately in the maturity summary.
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities
because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay
obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Fair | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Securities held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
999 |
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
2,601 |
|
|
|
2,579 |
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
6,510 |
|
|
|
6,924 |
|
Small Business Administration loan pools
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
118,133 |
|
|
|
117,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
129,549 |
|
|
$ |
128,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
66,800 |
|
|
|
66,489 |
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
24,289 |
|
|
|
24,191 |
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
27,709 |
|
|
|
27,668 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
537,382 |
|
|
|
529,967 |
|
Other
|
|
|
10,781 |
|
|
|
10,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
666,961 |
|
|
$ |
659,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross gains and losses from investment securities of $177 and
$158 in 2004, $0 and $265 in 2003, and $682 and $73 in 2002,
respectively, were recognized on the sale of securities.
F-17
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
The components of the Companys loan portfolio as of
December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Construction and land development, including raw commercial land
of approximately $77,252 for 2004 and $42,872 for 2003
|
|
$ |
323,176 |
|
|
$ |
195,182 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
491,949 |
|
|
|
324,702 |
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
116,360 |
|
|
|
42,773 |
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
241,292 |
|
|
|
159,889 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
17,682 |
|
|
|
11,802 |
|
Less: net deferred loan fees
|
|
|
(1,924 |
) |
|
|
(1,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,188,535 |
|
|
|
733,078 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(15,271 |
) |
|
|
(11,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,173,264 |
|
|
$ |
721,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information about impaired and nonaccrual loans as of and for
the years ended December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Total impaired loans, all with an allowance for loan losses
|
|
$ |
1,718 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related allowance for loan losses on impaired loans
|
|
$ |
498 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non accrual loans
|
|
$ |
1,591 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Average balance during the year on impaired loans
|
|
$ |
1,553 |
|
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
3,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is not committed to lend significant additional
funds on these impaired loans.
Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended
December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, beginning
|
|
$ |
11,378 |
|
|
$ |
6,449 |
|
|
$ |
6,563 |
|
|
Provision charged to operating expense
|
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
5,145 |
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
Recoveries of amounts charged off
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
Less amounts charged off
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(1,373 |
) |
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
|
Reclassification (to) from other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
$ |
15,271 |
|
|
$ |
11,378 |
|
|
$ |
6,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with regulatory reporting requirements and
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Statement of
Position 01-06,
Accounting by Certain Entities that Lend to or Finance the
Activities of Others, the Company has reclassified the
portion of its allowance for loan losses that relates to off-
F-18
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
balance sheet risk during the year ended December 31, 2002.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, management
reevaluated its methodology for calculating this amount and
reclassified an amount from other liabilities to the allowance
for loan losses. The liability amount was approximately $307 and
$68 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
|
|
Note 6. |
Premises and Equipment |
The major classes of premises and equipment and the total
accumulated depreciation and amortization as of December 31
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Land
|
|
$ |
13,355 |
|
|
$ |
7,795 |
|
Bank premises
|
|
|
6,246 |
|
|
|
4,092 |
|
Equipment and furniture
|
|
|
15,120 |
|
|
|
10,937 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
4,306 |
|
|
|
2,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,027 |
|
|
|
25,129 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(9,663 |
) |
|
|
(7,091 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premises and equipment
|
|
$ |
29,364 |
|
|
$ |
18,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7. |
Income Tax Matters |
The cumulative tax effects of the primary temporary differences
as of December 31 are shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$ |
5,500 |
|
|
$ |
3,600 |
|
|
Unrealized loss on available for sale securities
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
Organizational costs
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
Accrual to cash adjustment
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
8,831 |
|
|
|
6,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan costs
|
|
|
(800 |
) |
|
|
(700 |
) |
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
(1,700 |
) |
|
|
(700 |
) |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank dividend
|
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(2,882 |
) |
|
|
(1,458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$ |
5,949 |
|
|
$ |
4,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, no valuation allowance
was considered necessary as management believes it is more
likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized
due to taxes paid in prior years or future operations. The
provision for income taxes charged to operations consists of the
following for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current
|
|
$ |
11,030 |
|
|
$ |
5,641 |
|
|
$ |
4,458 |
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(1,470 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$ |
10,961 |
|
|
$ |
4,171 |
|
|
$ |
4,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reasons for the differences between the statutory federal
income tax rate and the effective tax rates are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Computed expected tax expense
|
|
$ |
10,856 |
|
|
$ |
4,501 |
|
|
$ |
4,425 |
|
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefits
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt income
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
Nondeductible expenses
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,961 |
|
|
$ |
4,171 |
|
|
$ |
4,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004, the scheduled maturities of all time
deposits are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
227,854 |
|
2006
|
|
|
8,410 |
|
2007
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
2008
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
237,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, approximately $255,415
and $124,682, respectively, of the Companys non-interest
bearing demand deposits consisted of demand accounts maintained
by title insurance companies. The Company provides an analysis
earnings credit for certain title company depositors, which
credit is calculated by applying a variable crediting rate to
such customers average monthly deposit balances, less any
internal charges incurred, which are comprised of common deposit
service charges. We then purchase external services on behalf of
these customers based on the amount of the earnings credit.
These external services, which are commonly offered in the
banking industry, include courier, bookkeeping and data
processing services. The expense of these external services
totaled $701, $95 and $325 for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and is included in customer
service expense in the accompanying statements of income.
F-20
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
The Company has a line of credit available from the Federal Home
Loan Bank (FHLB). Borrowing capacity is determined based on
collateral pledged, generally consisting of securities, at the
time of the borrowing. The Company also has borrowings from
other sources pledged by securities. A summary of the
Companys borrowings as of December 31, 2004 and 2003
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Short Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB Advances (weighted average rate is 2004: 2.21% 2003: 1.26%)
|
|
$ |
151,900 |
|
|
$ |
163,211 |
|
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase (weighted average
rate is 2004: 2.32% 2003: 1.41%)
|
|
|
33,594 |
|
|
|
78,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$ |
185,494 |
|
|
$ |
241,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB Advances (weighted average rate is 2004: 2.63% 2003: 2.70%)
|
|
$ |
63,700 |
|
|
$ |
89,400 |
|
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase (weighted average
rate is 2003: 4.17%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in over one year
|
|
$ |
63,700 |
|
|
$ |
97,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances and other borrowings mature as of
December 31, 2004 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
185,494 |
|
2006
|
|
|
34,400 |
|
2007
|
|
|
29,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
249,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are reflected at
the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction.
The Company may be required to provide additional collateral
based on the fair value of the underlying securities.
The Companys banks have entered into agreements under
which they can borrow up to $45,000 on an unsecured basis. The
lending institutions will determine the interest rate charged on
borrowings at the time of the borrowing. The Company has also
entered into an agreement under which it can borrow up to
$10,000. The line of credit is secured by BankWest of Nevada
stock and carries an interest rate at the federal funds
borrowing rate plus 1.50%. There were no borrowings against
these lines of credit at December 31, 2004 or 2003.
|
|
Note 10. |
Junior Subordinated Debt |
In December 2002, BankWest Nevada Capital Trust II was
formed and issued floating rate Cumulative Trust Preferred
Securities, which are classified as junior subordinated debt in
the accompanying balance sheet in the amount of $15,464. The
rate is based on the three month London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR) plus 3.35%. Three month LIBOR was 2.49% at
December 31, 2004. The funds raised from the capital
trusts issuance of these securities were all passed to the
Company. The sole asset of the BankWest Nevada Capital
Trust II is a note receivable from the Company. These
securities require quarterly interest payments and mature in
2033. These securities may be redeemable at par beginning in
2008.
F-21
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
In July 2001, BankWest Nevada Capital Trust I was formed
and issued floating rate Cumulative Trust Preferred
Securities, which are classified as junior subordinated debt in
the accompanying balance sheet in the amount of $15,464. The
rate is based on the six month LIBOR plus 3.75%. Six month LIBOR
was 2.78% at December 31, 2004. The funds raised from the
capital trusts issuance of these securities were all
passed to the Company. The sole asset of the BankWest Nevada
Capital Trust I is a note receivable from the Company.
These securities require semiannual interest payments and mature
in 2031. These securities may be redeemed in years 2006 through
2011 at a premium as outlined in the Indenture Agreement.
In the event of certain changes or amendments to regulatory
requirements or federal tax rules, the preferred securities are
redeemable. The Trusts are 100% owned finance subsidiaries of
the Company and the Trusts obligations under the preferred
securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the
Company.
|
|
Note 11. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in
various legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, any
liability resulting from such proceedings would not have a
material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Financial instruments with off-balance sheet
risk |
The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the
financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments
include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of
credit. They involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit
risk in excess of amounts recognized on the consolidated balance
sheets.
The Companys exposure to credit loss in the event of
nonperformance by the other parties to the financial instrument
for these commitments is represented by the contractual amounts
of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies
in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for
on-balance-sheet instruments. A summary of the contract amount
of the Companys exposure to off-balance sheet risk as of
December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Commitments to extend credit, including unsecured loan
commitments of $81,606 in 2004 and $66,940 in 2003
|
|
$ |
423,767 |
|
|
$ |
262,595 |
|
Credit card guarantees
|
|
|
5,421 |
|
|
|
5,553 |
|
Standby letters of credit, including unsecured letters of credit
of $1,264 in 2004 and $448 in 2003
|
|
|
5,978 |
|
|
|
3,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
435,166 |
|
|
$ |
272,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a
customer as long as there is no violation of any condition
established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require
payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to
expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do
not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company
evaluates each customers creditworthiness on a
case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed
necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on
managements credit evaluation of the party. Collateral
held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory,
property and equipment, residential real estate and
income-producing commercial properties.
F-22
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
The Company guarantees certain customer credit card balances
held by an unrelated third party. These unsecured guarantees act
to streamline the credit underwriting process and are issued as
a service to certain customers who wish to obtain a credit card
from the third party vendor. The Company recognizes nominal fees
from these arrangements and views them strictly as a means of
maintaining good customer relationships. The guarantee is
offered to those customers who, based solely upon
managements evaluation, maintain a relationship with the
Company that justifies the inherent risk. All such guarantees
exist for the life of each respective credit card relationship.
The Company would be required to perform under the guarantee
upon a customers default on the credit card relationship
with the third party. Historical losses under this program have
been nominal. Upon entering into a credit card guarantee, the
Company records the related liability at fair value pursuant to
FASB Interpretation 45 (FIN 45), Guarantors
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. Thereafter,
the related liability is evaluated pursuant to FASB 5. The total
credit card balances outstanding at December 31, 2004 and
2003 were $1,109 and $1,556, respectively.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by
the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a
third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support
public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk
involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as
that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
Collateral held varies as specified above and is required as the
Company deems necessary. Essentially all letters of credit
issued have expiration dates within one year. Upon entering into
a letter of credit, the Company records the related liability at
fair value pursuant to FIN 45. Thereafter, the related
liability is evaluated pursuant to FASB 5.
The total liability for financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $307 and
$68, respectively.
Lease
Commitments
The Company leases certain premises and equipment under
noncancelable operating leases expiring through 2013. The
following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments under
these leases at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
3,545 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
3,560 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
3,520 |
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
5,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense of $3,174, $2,017 and $1,438 is included in
occupancy expenses for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002, respectively.
Concentrations
The Company grants commercial, construction, real estate and
consumer loans to customers through branch offices located in
the Companys primary markets. The Companys business
is concentrated in these areas and the loan portfolio includes
significant credit exposure to the commercial real estate
industry of these areas. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
real estate related loans accounted for approximately 78% and 77%
F-23
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
of total loans, respectively. Substantially all of these loans
are secured by first liens with an initial loan to value ratio
of generally not more than 80%. Approximately one-half of these
real estate loans are owner occupied. In addition, approximately
7% and 5% of total loans are unsecured as of December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively.
The loans are expected to be repaid from cash flows or proceeds
from the sale of selected assets of the borrowers. The
Companys policy for requiring collateral is to obtain
collateral whenever it is available or desirable, depending upon
the degree of risk the Company is willing to take.
Note 12. Stock
Options, Stock Warrants and Stock Appreciation Rights
The Company has adopted three Stock Option Plans, the 2002 Stock
Option Plan, the 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan, and the 1997
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, as amended, (the
Plans). Under these Plans, options to acquire common
stock of the Company may be granted to employees, officers or
directors at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The 2002
Plan allows for the granting of 1,350,000 incentive or
non-qualifying stock options as those terms are defined in the
Internal Revenue Code, with an additional 500,000 ratified by
the stockholders during the year ended December 31, 2004.
The 1997 Plans allow for the granting of 765,000 incentive and
756,000 nonqualifying stock options. The Plans provide for the
exercise price and term of each option to be determined by the
Board at the date of grant, provided that no options have a term
greater than 10 years and an option price not less than the
fair market value on the date of grant.
A summary of stock option activity during the years ended
December 31 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding options, beginning of year
|
|
|
1,680,308 |
|
|
|
1,359,850 |
|
|
|
534,744 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
439,500 |
|
|
|
442,000 |
|
|
|
887,500 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(97,800 |
) |
|
|
(108,042 |
) |
|
|
(53,394 |
) |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(36,000 |
) |
|
|
(13,500 |
) |
|
|
(9,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options, end of year
|
|
|
1,986,008 |
|
|
|
1,680,308 |
|
|
|
1,359,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, end of year
|
|
|
642,908 |
|
|
|
450,208 |
|
|
|
370,450 |
|
Available to grant, end of year
|
|
|
354,600 |
|
|
|
258,100 |
|
|
|
686,600 |
|
Weighted-average exercise price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options, beginning of year
|
|
$ |
6.70 |
|
|
$ |
5.87 |
|
|
$ |
3.08 |
|
|
Options granted, during the year
|
|
$ |
12.17 |
|
|
$ |
7.85 |
|
|
$ |
7.03 |
|
|
Options exercised, during the year
|
|
$ |
4.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
Options outstanding, end of year
|
|
$ |
7.96 |
|
|
$ |
6.70 |
|
|
$ |
5.87 |
|
|
Options forfeited, during the year
|
|
$ |
3.79 |
|
|
$ |
7.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
|
Options exercisable, end of year
|
|
$ |
6.04 |
|
|
$ |
4.90 |
|
|
$ |
2.90 |
|
Weighted-average expiration (in years)
|
|
|
8.03 |
|
|
|
8.43 |
|
|
|
8.68 |
|
F-24
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
A further summary of stock options outstanding at
December 31, 2004 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
Exercisable Options | |
|
|
Remaining Contractual | |
|
| |
Exercise Price |
|
Number of Shares | |
|
Life (Years) | |
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$ 1.39
|
|
|
97,050 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
|
|
97,050 |
|
$ 3.79
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
5.25 |
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
$ 6.33
|
|
|
137,458 |
|
|
|
6.74 |
|
|
|
121,158 |
|
$ 7.03
|
|
|
1,100,500 |
|
|
|
7.98 |
|
|
|
369,200 |
|
$ 9.00
|
|
|
189,000 |
|
|
|
8.81 |
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
$12.00
|
|
|
392,000 |
|
|
|
9.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
$13.20
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
9.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
$15.00
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
9.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
During 2004, the Company granted 439,500 incentive and
nonqualifying stock options. All of these options vest over five
years at 20% upon each anniversary date of the grant. These
options expire ten years from the date of grant, and their
weighted average exercise price is $12.17.
During 2003, the Company granted 442,000 incentive and
nonqualifying stock options. All of these options vest over five
years at 20% upon each anniversary date of the grant. These
options expire ten years from the date of grant, and their
weighted average exercise price is $7.85.
During 2002, the Company granted 887,500 incentive and
nonqualifying stock options. All of these options vest over five
years at 20% upon each anniversary date of the grant. These
options expire ten years from date of grant, and their exercise
price is $7.03.
Stock Appreciation
Rights
On February 14, 2000, the Companys Board of Directors
approved the 2000 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (SAR
Plan). The SAR Plan authorized 150,000 rights to be
granted to certain directors, officers and key employees at the
discretion of the Board of Directors. Each right gives the
grantee the right to receive cash payment from the Company equal
to the excess of (a) the exercise price of the SAR over,
(b) grant price of the SAR. Grantees may exercise their
rights at any time between the time a right vests and five years
following the date of grant. Rights granted under the SAR Plan
vest in annual installments of 25% beginning one year following
the vesting commencement date. Pursuant to the plan, prior to an
initial public offering, the exercise price is equal to the book
value. As such, changes in the book value of the Companys
common stock are reflected as a charge to compensation expense
for each period in which the rights are outstanding pursuant to
FASB Interpretation No. 28, Accounting for Stock
Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award
Plans. In 2003, the Board of Directors approved an amendment
to the plan that effectively tripled the number of rights
granted to each participating employee. The expense recorded in
2004, 2003 and 2002 was approximately $93, $568 and $88
respectively. The balance included in other liabilities was
approximately $0 and $724 at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. All outstanding rights were exercised in 2004 and
total payments to the participants in 2004 was approximately
$820.
F-25
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
Information concerning stock appreciation rights for the year
ended December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Rights outstanding, beginning of year
|
|
|
216,000 |
|
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(216,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares granted through amendment of plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights outstanding, end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,000 |
|
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights exercisable, end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,000 |
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
Available to grant, end of year
|
|
|
234,000 |
|
|
|
234,000 |
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
All stock options and stock appreciation rights information has
been retroactively adjusted for the three for one stock split
effected in 2002.
Stock Warrants
In 2002, in connection with a common stock offering the Company
entered into a warrant purchase agreement in which the Company
authorized the sale and issuance of 1,502,049 stock warrants.
The warrants are exercisable at $7.62 and expire in 2010. During
the year ended December 31, 2004, 20,481 warrants were
exercised. 1,481,568 warrants are outstanding as of
December 31, 2004.
|
|
Note 13. |
Regulatory Capital |
The Company and the Banks are subject to various regulatory
capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies.
Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate
certain mandatory and possibly additional
discretionary actions by regulators that, if
undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the
Companys and the Banks consolidated financial
statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the
Banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
qualitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain
off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory
accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are
also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about
components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt
corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding
companies.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure
capital adequacy require the Company and the Banks to maintain
minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of
total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to
risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital
(as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management
believes, as of December 31, 2004, that the Company and the
Banks meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are
subject.
As of December 31, 2004, the most recent notification from
federal banking agencies categorized the Company, BankWest of
Nevada, Alliance Bank of Arizona and Torrey Pines Bank as
well-capitalized as defined by the banking agencies. To be
categorized as well-capitalized, the Banks must maintain minimum
total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I
leverage ratios as set forth in the table below.
F-26
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
The actual capital amounts and ratios for the Banks and Company
as of December 31 are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequacy | |
|
To Be | |
|
|
Actual | |
|
Purposes | |
|
Well Capitalized | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Ratio | |
|
Amount | |
|
Ratio | |
|
Amount | |
|
Ratio | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
As of December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest of Nevada
|
|
$ |
105,544 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
$ |
80,968 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
101,210 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona
|
|
|
35,258 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
22,428 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
28,035 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
Torrey Pines Bank
|
|
|
28,809 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
16,013 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
20,016 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
Company
|
|
|
178,784 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
119,632 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
149,540 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest of Nevada
|
|
|
95,449 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
40,484 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
60,726 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona
|
|
|
31,810 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
11,214 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
16,821 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
Torrey Pines Bank
|
|
|
26,774 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
8,006 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
12,010 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
Company
|
|
|
163,205 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
59,816 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
89,724 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest of Nevada
|
|
|
95,449 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
62,970 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
78,713 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona
|
|
|
31,810 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
12,394 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
15,492 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
Torrey Pines Bank
|
|
|
26,774 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
9,830 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
12,288 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
Company
|
|
|
163,205 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
85,321 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
106,651 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
As of December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest of Nevada
|
|
$ |
79,604 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
$ |
59,686 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
74,607 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona
|
|
|
19,529 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
10,987 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
13,734 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
Torrey Pines Bank
|
|
|
19,877 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
7,859 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
9,823 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
Company
|
|
|
141,321 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
78,379 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
97,974 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest of Nevada
|
|
|
71,107 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
29,843 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
44,764 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona
|
|
|
17,814 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
5,494 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
8,241 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
Torrey Pines Bank
|
|
|
18,755 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
|
3,929 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
5,894 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
Company
|
|
|
129,875 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
39,190 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
58,785 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest of Nevada
|
|
|
71,107 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
46,510 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
58,137 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
Alliance Bank of Arizona
|
|
|
17,814 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
6,696 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
8,371 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
Torrey Pines Bank
|
|
|
18,755 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
5,234 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
6,542 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
Company
|
|
|
129,875 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
58,457 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
73,027 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Additionally, State of Nevada banking regulations restrict
distribution of the net assets of BankWest of Nevada (BankWest)
because such regulations require the sum of BankWests
stockholders equity and reserve for loan losses to be at
least 6% of the average of BankWests total daily deposit
liabilities for the preceding 60 days. As a result of these
regulations, approximately $74,283 and $55,215 of
BankWests stockholders equity was restricted at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
F-27
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
Alliance Bank of Arizona and Torrey Pines Bank have agreed to
maintain a total Tier 1 capital to total assets ratio of at
least 8% for their first three years of existence.
The States of Nevada and Arizona require that trust companies
maintain capital of at least $300 and $500, respectively.
Premier Trust meets these capital requirements as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
Note 14. |
Employee Benefit Plan |
The Company has a qualified 401(k) employee benefit plan for all
eligible employees. Participants are able to defer between 1%
and 15% (up to a maximum of $13,000 for those under
50 years of age) of their annual compensation. The Company
may elect to contribute a discretionary amount each year. The
Companys total contribution was $385, $230 and $180 for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively.
|
|
Note 15. |
Transactions with Related Parties |
Principal stockholders of the Company and officers and
directors, including their families and companies of which they
are principal owners, are considered to be related parties.
These related parties were loan customers of, and had other
transactions with, the Company in the ordinary course of
business. In managements opinion, these loans and
transactions were on the same terms as those for comparable
loans and transactions with unrelated parties.
The aggregate activity in such loans for the years ended
December 31 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, beginning
|
|
$ |
18,222 |
|
|
$ |
8,500 |
|
|
New loans
|
|
|
44,380 |
|
|
|
21,351 |
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(35,515 |
) |
|
|
(11,629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
$ |
27,087 |
|
|
$ |
18,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None of these loans are past due, on nonaccrual or have been
restructured to provide a reduction or deferral of interest or
principal because of deterioration in the financial position of
the borrower. There were no loans to a related party that were
considered classified loans at December 31, 2004 or 2003.
Total loan commitments outstanding with related parties total
approximately $35,418 and $9,880 at December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively.
In 2003, the Company purchased land from a related party in the
amount of $1,165. In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company
began leasing office space to a related party. Total rent income
recognized under this lease was $26.
F-28
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Note 16. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The estimated fair value of the Companys financial
instruments at December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$ |
92,282 |
|
|
$ |
92,282 |
|
|
$ |
61,893 |
|
|
$ |
61,893 |
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
23,115 |
|
|
|
23,115 |
|
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
Securities held to maturity
|
|
|
129,549 |
|
|
|
128,984 |
|
|
|
132,294 |
|
|
|
131,572 |
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
659,073 |
|
|
|
659,073 |
|
|
|
583,684 |
|
|
|
583,684 |
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
15,097 |
|
|
|
15,097 |
|
|
|
12,628 |
|
|
|
12,628 |
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
1,173,264 |
|
|
|
1,170,202 |
|
|
|
721,700 |
|
|
|
723,572 |
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
8,359 |
|
|
|
8,359 |
|
|
|
6,389 |
|
|
|
6,389 |
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,756,036 |
|
|
|
1,756,297 |
|
|
|
1,094,646 |
|
|
|
1,095,036 |
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
2,320 |
|
|
|
2,320 |
|
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
249,194 |
|
|
|
248,048 |
|
|
|
338,661 |
|
|
|
339,462 |
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
The Company assumes interest rate risk (the risk to the
Companys earnings and capital from changes in interest
rate levels) as a result of its normal operations. As a result,
the fair values of the Companys financial instruments as
well as its future net interest income will change when interest
rate levels change and that change may be either favorable or
unfavorable to the Company.
Interest rate risk exposure is measured using interest rate
sensitivity analysis to determine our change in net portfolio
value and net interest income resulting from hypothetical
changes in interest rates. If potential changes to net portfolio
value and net interest income resulting from hypothetical
interest rate changes are not within the limits established by
the Board of Directors, the Board of Directors may direct
management to adjust the asset and liability mix to bring
interest rate risk within board-approved limits. As of
December 31, 2004, the Companys interest rate risk
profile was within all Board-prescribed limits.
The Company manages its interest rate risk through its
investment and repurchase activities. The Company seeks to
maintain a moderately asset sensitive position (i.e., interest
income in a rising rate environment would rise farther than the
Companys interest expense and conversely in a falling
interest rate environment).
|
|
|
Fair value of commitments |
The estimated fair value of the standby letters of credit at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 is insignificant. Loan
commitments on which the committed interest rate is less than
the current market rate are also insignificant at
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
F-29
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Note 17. |
Parent Company Financial Information |
Condensed Balance Sheets
December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
Cash
|
|
$ |
7,185 |
|
|
$ |
21,284 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
156,826 |
|
|
|
106,570 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
165,232 |
|
|
$ |
128,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities
|
|
$ |
733 |
|
|
$ |
604 |
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
31,661 |
|
|
|
31,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
80,459 |
|
|
|
62,533 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
58,216 |
|
|
|
38,159 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(5,106 |
) |
|
|
(3,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
133,571 |
|
|
|
97,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
165,232 |
|
|
$ |
128,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Income
Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest income
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest expense on borrowings
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
|
(1,442 |
) |
|
|
(1,494 |
) |
|
|
(938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
22,096 |
|
|
|
10,102 |
|
|
|
9,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax benefit
|
|
|
19,941 |
|
|
|
8,178 |
|
|
|
7,916 |
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
20,057 |
|
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
|
$ |
8,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
20,057 |
|
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
|
$ |
8,409 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net undistributed earnings of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(22,096 |
) |
|
|
(10,102 |
) |
|
|
(9,366 |
) |
|
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
(1,324 |
) |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(2,002 |
) |
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
|
(2,385 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
(27,623 |
) |
|
|
(39,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(27,623 |
) |
|
|
(39,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and stock warrants
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
Proceeds from stock issuance
|
|
|
14,955 |
|
|
|
25,507 |
|
|
|
21,364 |
|
|
Repurchase of Treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
15,526 |
|
|
|
25,007 |
|
|
|
36,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(14,099 |
) |
|
|
(14,943 |
) |
|
|
34,072 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
21,284 |
|
|
|
36,227 |
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of year
|
|
$ |
7,185 |
|
|
$ |
21,284 |
|
|
$ |
36,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 18. |
Segment Information |
The Company manages its core bank operations and prepares
management reports with a primary focus on each banking
subsidiary. The operating segment identified as
Other includes Western Alliance Bancorporation and
its non-bank subsidiaries, Miller/ Russell &
Associates, Inc., and Premier Trust, Inc. These non-bank
operations are not significant relative to the entity as a
whole, and are therefore not disclosed separately. Noninterest
income reflected for the Other category relates to
Western Alliance Bancorporations income from consolidated
subsidiaries, and for 2004 includes asset management fees earned
by the non-bank subsidiaries.
The accounting policies of the individual segments are the same
as those of the Company described in Note 1. Transactions
between operating segments are primarily conducted at fair
value, resulting in profits that are eliminated for reporting
consolidated results of operations. The Company allocates
centrally provided services to the business segments based upon
estimated usage of those services.
F-31
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following is a summary of selected operating segment
information as of and for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest | |
|
Alliance Bank | |
|
Torrey Pines | |
|
|
|
Intersegment | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
of Nevada | |
|
of Arizona | |
|
Bank | |
|
Other | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$ |
1,578,332 |
|
|
$ |
332,805 |
|
|
$ |
257,516 |
|
|
$ |
173,748 |
|
|
$ |
(165,552 |
) |
|
$ |
2,176,849 |
|
Gross loans and deferred fees
|
|
|
790,312 |
|
|
|
234,141 |
|
|
|
164,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,188,535 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(9,857 |
) |
|
|
(3,416 |
) |
|
|
(1,998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
780,455 |
|
|
|
230,725 |
|
|
|
162,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,173,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,287,615 |
|
|
|
277,231 |
|
|
|
199,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,192 |
) |
|
|
1,756,036 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
91,361 |
|
|
|
31,189 |
|
|
|
26,405 |
|
|
|
140,634 |
|
|
|
(156,018 |
) |
|
|
133,571 |
|
Number of branch locations
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
54,215 |
|
|
$ |
10,225 |
|
|
$ |
8,141 |
|
|
$ |
(1,444 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
71,135 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
52,798 |
|
|
|
8,568 |
|
|
|
7,301 |
|
|
|
(1,444 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
67,221 |
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
4,851 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
25,149 |
|
|
|
(22,652 |
) |
|
|
8,726 |
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
(27,286 |
) |
|
|
(8,074 |
) |
|
|
(6,301 |
) |
|
|
(3,705 |
) |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
(44,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
30,363 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(22,217 |
) |
|
|
31,018 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
10,033 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
20,330 |
|
|
$ |
846 |
|
|
$ |
1,020 |
|
|
$ |
20,078 |
|
|
$ |
(22,217 |
) |
|
$ |
20,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest | |
|
Alliance Bank | |
|
Torrey Pines | |
|
|
|
Intersegment | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
of Nevada | |
|
of Arizona | |
|
Bank | |
|
Other | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$ |
1,244,549 |
|
|
$ |
187,314 |
|
|
$ |
157,156 |
|
|
$ |
130,953 |
|
|
$ |
(143,199 |
) |
|
$ |
1,576,773 |
|
Gross loans and deferred fees
|
|
|
557,868 |
|
|
|
106,239 |
|
|
|
68,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733,078 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(8,460 |
) |
|
|
(1,759 |
) |
|
|
(1,159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
549,408 |
|
|
|
104,480 |
|
|
|
67,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
721,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
917,983 |
|
|
|
115,726 |
|
|
|
82,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,328 |
) |
|
|
1,094,646 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
69,114 |
|
|
|
17,117 |
|
|
|
18,394 |
|
|
|
98,353 |
|
|
|
(105,527 |
) |
|
|
97,451 |
|
Number of branch locations
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
37,615 |
|
|
$ |
3,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,768 |
|
|
$ |
(1,494 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
41,025 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
35,388 |
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
(1,494 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
35,880 |
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
10,102 |
|
|
|
(10,222 |
) |
|
|
4,270 |
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
(20,016 |
) |
|
|
(4,319 |
) |
|
|
(2,645 |
) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(27,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
19,415 |
|
|
|
(2,696 |
) |
|
|
(1,934 |
) |
|
|
8,178 |
|
|
|
(10,103 |
) |
|
|
12,860 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
6,352 |
|
|
|
(981 |
) |
|
|
(689 |
) |
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
13,063 |
|
|
$ |
(1,715 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,245 |
) |
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
|
$ |
(10,103 |
) |
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$ |
869,186 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
99,723 |
|
|
$ |
(96,835 |
) |
|
$ |
872,074 |
|
Gross loans and deferred fees
|
|
|
464,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464,355 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(6,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
457,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
756,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,227 |
) |
|
|
720,304 |
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
59,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,442 |
|
|
|
(59,680 |
) |
|
|
67,442 |
|
Number of branch locations
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
30,284 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(938 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,346 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
28,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,759 |
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,366 |
|
|
|
(9,366 |
) |
|
|
3,935 |
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
(18,538 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
14,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,916 |
|
|
|
(9,366 |
) |
|
|
12,644 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
4,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
9,366 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,409 |
|
|
$ |
(9,366 |
) |
|
$ |
8,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Note 19. |
Quarterly Data (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Fourth | |
|
Third | |
|
Second | |
|
First | |
|
Fourth | |
|
Third | |
|
Second | |
|
First | |
|
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest and dividend income
|
|
$ |
27,075 |
|
|
$ |
24,145 |
|
|
$ |
20,758 |
|
|
$ |
18,877 |
|
|
$ |
16,925 |
|
|
$ |
14,396 |
|
|
$ |
11,992 |
|
|
$ |
10,510 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,936 |
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
4,458 |
|
|
|
4,178 |
|
|
|
3,937 |
|
|
|
3,329 |
|
|
|
2,893 |
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
21,139 |
|
|
|
18,997 |
|
|
|
16,300 |
|
|
|
14,699 |
|
|
|
12,988 |
|
|
|
11,067 |
|
|
|
9,099 |
|
|
|
7,871 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
20,388 |
|
|
|
17,741 |
|
|
|
15,885 |
|
|
|
13,207 |
|
|
|
11,707 |
|
|
|
9,254 |
|
|
|
7,915 |
|
|
|
7,004 |
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
2,552 |
|
|
|
2,619 |
|
|
|
1,991 |
|
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
(12,873 |
) |
|
|
(11,740 |
) |
|
|
(10,624 |
) |
|
|
(9,692 |
) |
|
|
(9,169 |
) |
|
|
(6,425 |
) |
|
|
(6,277 |
) |
|
|
(5,419 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
10,067 |
|
|
|
8,620 |
|
|
|
7,252 |
|
|
|
5,079 |
|
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
|
4,039 |
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
2,486 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
|
2,602 |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
6,429 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
4,650 |
|
|
$ |
3,429 |
|
|
$ |
2,367 |
|
|
$ |
2,787 |
|
|
$ |
1,884 |
|
|
$ |
1,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 20. |
Subsequent Events |
In January 2005, the Board of Directors approved and granted
339,250 stock options and 27,000 shares of restricted stock
to various employees and directors. The options have an exercise
price of $16.50, vest over five years at 20% per year, and
expire in 10 years, and the shares of restricted stock vest
over 5 years at 20% per year. Additionally, 18,600
options were forfeited subsequent to year-end.
Also in January 2005, the Board of Directors reached a consensus
that established the Companys intent to engage in an
initial public offering of the Companys stock. It is
anticipated that this public offering will occur in the second
quarter of 2005.
In February 2005, a real estate investment trust was formed as a
wholly-owned subsidiary of BankWest of Nevada. Substantially all
real estate loans owned by BankWest of Nevada were transferred
to the subsidiary at that date. It is anticipated that all
mortgage-backed securities owned by BankWest of Nevada will be
transferred to the subsidiary during the first quarter of 2005.
The trust could be used as a vehicle to fund future capital
needs through the issuance of preferred securities.
F-34
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except | |
|
|
per share amounts) | |
ASSETS |
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$ |
90,618 |
|
|
$ |
92,282 |
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
203,999 |
|
|
|
23,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
294,617 |
|
|
|
115,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity (approximate fair value $115,689 and
$128,984, respectively)
|
|
|
117,116 |
|
|
|
129,549 |
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
595,959 |
|
|
|
659,073 |
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $19,288 and $15,271,
respectively
|
|
|
1,598,253 |
|
|
|
1,173,264 |
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
36,859 |
|
|
|
29,364 |
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
51,215 |
|
|
|
26,170 |
|
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
14,006 |
|
|
|
15,097 |
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
9,189 |
|
|
|
8,359 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
8,858 |
|
|
|
5,949 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,946 |
|
|
|
3,946 |
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $349
and $183, respectively
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
1,440 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
13,722 |
|
|
|
9,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,745,014 |
|
|
$ |
2,176,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
$ |
1,048,175 |
|
|
$ |
749,550 |
|
|
Interest bearing deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand
|
|
|
107,700 |
|
|
|
103,723 |
|
|
|
Savings and money market
|
|
|
893,736 |
|
|
|
665,425 |
|
|
|
Time, $100 and over
|
|
|
275,325 |
|
|
|
219,451 |
|
|
|
Other time
|
|
|
22,562 |
|
|
|
17,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,347,498 |
|
|
|
1,756,036 |
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less
|
|
|
55,810 |
|
|
|
185,494 |
|
|
|
Over one year
|
|
|
63,700 |
|
|
|
63,700 |
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
8,825 |
|
|
|
7,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,506,761 |
|
|
|
2,043,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $.0001; shares authorized 20,000,000;
no shares issued and outstanding 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.0001; shares authorized 100,000,000;
shares issued and outstanding 2005: 22,793,241; 2004:18,249,554
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
167,950 |
|
|
|
80,459 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
77,839 |
|
|
|
58,216 |
|
Deferred compensation restricted stock
|
|
|
(386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss net unrealized
loss on available for sale securities
|
|
|
(7,152 |
) |
|
|
(5,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
238,253 |
|
|
|
133,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
2,745,014 |
|
|
$ |
2,176,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-35
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Interest income on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees
|
|
$ |
27,343 |
|
|
$ |
15,866 |
|
|
$ |
71,266 |
|
|
$ |
40,819 |
|
|
Securities taxable
|
|
|
7,269 |
|
|
|
7,989 |
|
|
|
22,053 |
|
|
|
22,097 |
|
|
Securities nontaxable
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
Dividends taxable
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
Federal funds sold and other
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
1,919 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
35,700 |
|
|
|
24,145 |
|
|
|
95,935 |
|
|
|
63,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
6,767 |
|
|
|
3,228 |
|
|
|
17,124 |
|
|
|
8,344 |
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
2,376 |
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
8,369 |
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
22,208 |
|
|
|
13,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
27,331 |
|
|
|
18,997 |
|
|
|
73,727 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
3,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
26,048 |
|
|
|
17,741 |
|
|
|
69,510 |
|
|
|
46,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and investment advisory services
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
4,108 |
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
Service charges
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
Income from bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
Investment securities gains (losses), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
1,655 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
2,619 |
|
|
|
8,735 |
|
|
|
6,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
9,541 |
|
|
|
6,678 |
|
|
|
27,049 |
|
|
|
17,934 |
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
2,619 |
|
|
|
1,917 |
|
|
|
7,314 |
|
|
|
5,271 |
|
|
Customer service
|
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
2,930 |
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
Advertising and other business development
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
Legal, professional and director fees
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
Correspondent and wire transfer costs
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
Audits and exams
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
Travel and automobile
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,274 |
|
|
|
11,740 |
|
|
|
47,814 |
|
|
|
32,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
12,007 |
|
|
|
8,620 |
|
|
|
30,431 |
|
|
|
20,952 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
4,258 |
|
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
|
10,808 |
|
|
|
7,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
7,749 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
19,623 |
|
|
$ |
13,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
6,071 |
|
|
$ |
12,631 |
|
|
$ |
17,577 |
|
|
$ |
12,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-36
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
Common Stock | |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
| |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Retained | |
|
Restricted | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
Description |
|
Income | |
|
Shares Issued | |
|
Amount |
|
Shares Issued | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Stock | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
18,249,554 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
80,459 |
|
|
$ |
58,216 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,106 |
) |
|
$ |
133,571 |
|
Issuance of 4,200,000 shares of common stock, net of
offering costs of $7,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,063 |
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
Stock warrants exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
806 |
|
Restricted stock granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation cost on restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
19,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,623 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses on securities available for sale
arising during the period, net of taxes of $1,239
|
|
|
(2,001 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net
income, net of taxes of $24
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding losses
|
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
22,793,241 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
167,950 |
|
|
$ |
77,839 |
|
|
$ |
(386 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,152 |
) |
|
$ |
238,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-37
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
19,623 |
|
|
$ |
13,628 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,809 |
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
|
|
Net amortization of securities premiums
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
Stock dividends received, FHLB stock
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
3,163 |
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sales of securities available for sale
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
Compensation cost on restricted stock
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
(830 |
) |
|
|
(1,094 |
) |
|
|
(Increase) in bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
(1,045 |
) |
|
|
(907 |
) |
|
|
Increase in other assets
|
|
|
(4,260 |
) |
|
|
(1,535 |
) |
|
|
Increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
21,290 |
|
|
|
18,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of securities held to maturity
|
|
|
(8,233 |
) |
|
|
(19,964 |
) |
|
Proceeds from maturities of securities held to maturity
|
|
|
20,560 |
|
|
|
26,491 |
|
|
Purchases of securities available for sale
|
|
|
(85,747 |
) |
|
|
(409,644 |
) |
|
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale
|
|
|
125,697 |
|
|
|
244,469 |
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale
|
|
|
18,728 |
|
|
|
13,768 |
|
|
Net cash paid in settlement of acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,177 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale (purchase) of Federal Home
Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
(2,483 |
) |
|
Net increase in loans made to customers
|
|
|
(429,206 |
) |
|
|
(352,361 |
) |
|
Purchase of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(10,285 |
) |
|
|
(7,142 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
(24,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(390,893 |
) |
|
|
(509,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits
|
|
|
591,462 |
|
|
|
595,294 |
|
|
Net repayments on borrowings
|
|
|
(129,684 |
) |
|
|
(75,360 |
) |
|
Proceeds from stock issuance
|
|
|
85,063 |
|
|
|
14,955 |
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and stock warrants
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
548,823 |
|
|
|
535,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
179,220 |
|
|
|
44,669 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
115,397 |
|
|
|
65,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
294,617 |
|
|
$ |
110,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments for interest
|
|
$ |
23,141 |
|
|
$ |
14,860 |
|
|
Cash payments for income taxes
|
|
$ |
12,640 |
|
|
$ |
6,935 |
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing and Financing
Activities Stock issued in connection with acquisition
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-38
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Note 1. |
Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies |
Western Alliance Bancorporation is a bank holding company
providing a full range of banking services to commercial and
consumer customers through its wholly owned subsidiaries
BankWest of Nevada, operating in Nevada, Alliance Bank of
Arizona, operating in Arizona, Torrey Pines Bank, operating in
Southern California, Miller/ Russell & Associates,
Inc., operating in Nevada, Arizona and Southern California, and
Premier Trust, Inc., operating in Nevada and Arizona. These
entities are collectively referred to herein as the Company.
Alliance Bank of Arizona and Torrey Pines Bank began operations
during the year ended December 31, 2003. The accounting and
reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
and general industry practices.
A summary of the significant accounting policies of the Company
follows:
|
|
|
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial
statements |
The preparation of financial statements requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. A
material estimate that is particularly susceptible to
significant change in the near term relates to the determination
of the allowance for loan losses.
|
|
|
Principles of consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, BankWest of
Nevada, Alliance Bank of Arizona, Torrey Pines Bank
(collectively referred to herein as the Banks), Miller/
Russell & Associates, Inc., and Premier Trust, Inc. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
|
|
|
Interim financial information |
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements as
of September 30, 2005 and 2004 have been prepared in
condensed format, and therefore do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by generally accepted
accounting principles for complete financial statements.
The information furnished in these interim statements reflects
all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair statement of the results for each
respective period presented. Such adjustments are of a normal
recurring nature. The results of operations in the interim
statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for any other quarter or for the full year. The
interim financial information should be read in conjunction with
the Companys audited financial statements.
Condensed financial information as of December 31, 2004 has
been presented next to the interim consolidated balance sheet
for informational purposes.
At September 30, 2005, the Company has the 2005 Stock
Inventive Plan (2005 Plan), which is an amendment and
restatement of the three plans described more fully in
Note 12 of the audited financial statements. There were no
modifications to outstanding options as a result of this
amendment. The shares available for issuance under the 2005 Plan
are 3,255,000, taking into account awards outstanding under the
prior three plans of 2,248,550. The Company accounts for the
plan under the recognition and measurement principles of APB
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related interpretations.
F-39
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accordingly, no stock-based employee compensation cost has been
recognized, as all options granted under those plans had an
exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying
common stock on the date of grant. The following table
illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share had
compensation cost for all of the stock-based compensation plans
been determined based on the grant date fair values of awards
(the method described in FASB Statement No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
7,749 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
19,623 |
|
|
$ |
13,628 |
|
|
Deduct total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all awards
|
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
(481 |
) |
|
Related tax benefit for nonqualified stock options
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
7,509 |
|
|
$ |
5,387 |
|
|
$ |
18,981 |
|
|
$ |
13,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
The pro forma compensation cost was recognized for the fair
value of the stock options granted, which was estimated using
the minimum value method for those options granted prior to our
initial public offering, and the Black-Scholes method for those
granted after it. For options granted prior to our initial
public offering, the assumptions used in determining the fair
value per optional share of $4.04 and $2.84 for stock options
granted in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and
2004, respectively, were as follows: expected life of seven
years and risk free interest rate of 4.1% and 3.9%,
respectively. For options granted after our initial public
offering, the assumptions used in determining the fair value per
optional shares of $9.40 were as follows: expected life of seven
years, risk free interest rate of 4.0%, and volatility of 29%.
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
published FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment, or FAS 123(R). FAS 123(R)
requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based
payment transactions, including grants of employee stock
options, be recognized in financial statements. That cost will
be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability
instruments issued. FAS 123(R) permits entities to use any
option-pricing model that meets the fair value objective in the
Statement. Modifications of share-based payments will be treated
as replacement awards with the cost of the incremental value
recorded in the financial statements.
The Statement will be effective at the beginning of the first
quarter of 2006. As of the effective date, we will apply the
Statement using a modified version of prospective application.
Under that transition method, compensation cost will be
recognized for (i) all awards granted after the required
effective date and to awards modified, cancelled, or repurchased
after that date and (ii) the portion of awards granted
subsequent to completion of the Companys initial public
offering (IPO) and prior to the effective date for which
the requisite service has not yet been rendered, based on the
grant-date fair value of those awards calculated for pro forma
disclosures under SFAS 123. No compensation cost will be
recognized for awards granted before the completion of the
Companys IPO since the value of those awards were
calculated using the minimum
F-40
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
value method. The impact of this statement on the Company in
2006 and beyond will depend on various factors, including our
compensation strategy.
On April 27, 2005, the Companys shareholders approved
an increase in the total number of authorized shares of capital
stock from 50,000,000 to 120,000,000. The total increase of
70,000,000 shares includes 50,000,000 shares
designated as common stock and 20,000,000 shares designated
as preferred stock. Upon the issuance of any series of preferred
stock, the holders of shares of such series will have certain
preferences over the holders of outstanding shares of common
stock, depending upon the specific terms of such series
designated by the Board of Directors.
|
|
Note 2. |
Earnings Per Share |
Diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average
outstanding common shares during each period, including common
stock equivalents. Basic earnings per share is based on the
weighted average outstanding common shares during the period.
Basic and diluted earnings per share, based on the weighted
average outstanding shares, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock
|
|
$ |
7,749 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
19,623 |
|
|
$ |
13,628 |
|
|
Average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
22,732,713 |
|
|
|
16,994,849 |
|
|
|
19,841,670 |
|
|
|
16,838,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock
|
|
$ |
7,749 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
19,623 |
|
|
$ |
13,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
22,732,713 |
|
|
|
16,994,849 |
|
|
|
19,841,670 |
|
|
|
16,838,882 |
|
|
Stock option adjustment
|
|
|
1,340,705 |
|
|
|
669,478 |
|
|
|
1,128,402 |
|
|
|
694,500 |
|
|
Stock warrant adjustment
|
|
|
1,008,205 |
|
|
|
540,772 |
|
|
|
886,541 |
|
|
|
500,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common equivalent shares outstanding
|
|
|
25,081,623 |
|
|
|
18,205,099 |
|
|
|
21,856,613 |
|
|
|
18,034,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,250 stock options are not included in the above calculations
for the three months ended September 30, 2005 as the effect
would have been anti-dilutive.
F-41
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of the Companys loan portfolio as of
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Construction and land development
|
|
$ |
396,970 |
|
|
$ |
323,176 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
655,004 |
|
|
|
491,949 |
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
239,538 |
|
|
|
116,360 |
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
307,045 |
|
|
|
241,292 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
21,046 |
|
|
|
17,682 |
|
Less: net deferred loan fees
|
|
|
(2,062 |
) |
|
|
(1,924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,617,541 |
|
|
|
1,188,535 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(19,288 |
) |
|
|
(15,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,598,253 |
|
|
$ |
1,173,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, beginning
|
|
$ |
18,118 |
|
|
$ |
13,360 |
|
|
$ |
15,271 |
|
|
$ |
11,378 |
|
|
Provision charged to operating expense
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
3,163 |
|
|
Recoveries of amounts charged off
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
Less amounts charged off
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(371 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
$ |
19,288 |
|
|
$ |
14,525 |
|
|
$ |
19,288 |
|
|
$ |
14,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2005, total impaired and non-accrual loans
were $175, and loans past due 90 days or more and still
accruing were $2,503.
|
|
Note 4. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
On September 15, 2005, BankWest of Nevada entered into a
real estate purchase agreement for the purchase of a bank branch
and office building, which is currently leased by BankWest of
Nevada and serves as the headquarters for BankWest of Nevada and
the Company. The purchase price is $16,300 and the transaction
is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2005.
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in
various legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, any
liability resulting from such proceedings would not have a
material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.
F-42
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk |
The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the
financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments
include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of
credit. They involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit
risk in excess of amounts recognized on the consolidated balance
sheets.
The Companys exposure to credit loss in the event of
nonperformance by the other parties to the financial instrument
for these commitments is represented by the contractual amounts
of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies
in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for
on-balance-sheet instruments. A summary of the contract amount
of the Companys exposure to off-balance sheet risk is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Commitments to extend credit, including unsecured loan
commitments of $125,960 in 2005 and $81,606 in 2004
|
|
$ |
674,341 |
|
|
$ |
423,767 |
|
Credit card guarantees
|
|
|
7,404 |
|
|
|
5,421 |
|
Standby letters of credit, including unsecured letters of credit
of $4,463 in 2005 and $1,264 in 2004
|
|
|
29,506 |
|
|
|
5,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
711,251 |
|
|
$ |
435,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a
customer as long as there is no violation of any condition
established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require
payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to
expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do
not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company
evaluates each customers creditworthiness on a
case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed
necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on
managements credit evaluation of the party. Collateral
held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory,
property and equipment, residential real estate and
income-producing commercial properties.
The Company guarantees certain customer credit card balances
held by an unrelated third party. These unsecured guarantees act
to streamline the credit underwriting process and are issued as
a service to certain customers who wish to obtain a credit card
from the third party vendor. The Company recognizes nominal fees
from these arrangements and views them strictly as a means of
maintaining good customer relationships. The guarantee is
offered to those customers who, based solely upon
managements evaluation, maintain a relationship with the
Company that justifies the inherent risk. Essentially all such
guarantees exist for the life of each respective credit card
relationship. The Company would be required to perform under the
guarantee upon a customers default on the credit card
relationship with the third party. Historical losses under the
program have been nominal. Upon entering into a credit card
guarantee, the Company records the related liability at fair
value pursuant to FASB Interpretation 45 (FIN 45),
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others. Thereafter, the related liability is evaluated
pursuant to FASB 5. The total credit card balances outstanding
at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are $1,319
and $1,109, respectively.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by
the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a
third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support
public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk
involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as
that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
Collateral held varies as specified above and is required as the
Company deems necessary. Essentially all letters of credit
issued have expiration dates within one year.
F-43
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Upon entering into a letter of credit, the Company records the
related liability at fair value pursuant to FIN 45.
Thereafter, the related liability is evaluated pursuant to FASB
5.
The total liability for financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk as of September 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004 was $507 and $307, respectively.
The Company grants commercial, construction, real estate and
consumer loans to customers through offices located in the
Companys primary markets. The Companys business is
concentrated in these areas and the loan portfolio includes
significant credit exposure to the commercial real estate
industry of these areas. At September 30, 2005 real estate
related loans accounted for approximately 80% of total loans,
and approximately 6% of real estate loans are secured by
undeveloped land. Substantially all of these loans are secured
by first liens with an initial loan to value ratio of generally
not more than 80%. Approximately one-half of these real estate
loans are owner occupied. In addition, approximately 7% of total
loans are unsecured as of September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004.
The loans are expected to be repaid from cash flows or proceeds
from the sale of selected assets of the borrowers. The
Companys policy for requiring collateral is to obtain
collateral whenever it is available or desirable, depending upon
the degree of risk the Company is willing to take.
|
|
Note 5. |
Stock Options, Stock Warrants and Restricted Stock |
The Company granted 383,500 stock options and 27,000 shares
of restricted stock to various employees and directors during
the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The options had a
weighted average exercise price of $17.28 and vest at 20% a year
from the date of grant. The restricted stock vests at
20% per year. 210,864 stock options were exercised and
35,100 stock options were forfeited during the nine months ended
September 30, 2005. These exercised and forfeited options
had a weighted average exercise price of $5.51 and $10.85,
respectively.
105,823 warrants were exercised during the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 at an exercise price of $7.62.
F-44
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 6. |
Segment Information |
The following is a summary of selected operating segment
information as of and for the periods ended September 30,
2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest | |
|
Alliance Bank | |
|
Torrey Pines | |
|
|
|
Intersegment | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
of Nevada | |
|
of Arizona | |
|
Bank | |
|
Other | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
At September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$ |
1,815,708 |
|
|
$ |
514,073 |
|
|
$ |
357,272 |
|
|
$ |
277,999 |
|
|
$ |
(220,038 |
) |
|
$ |
2,745,014 |
|
|
Gross loans and deferred fees
|
|
|
1,002,762 |
|
|
|
358,490 |
|
|
|
256,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,617,541 |
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(11,474 |
) |
|
|
(4,833 |
) |
|
|
(2,981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
991,288 |
|
|
|
353,657 |
|
|
|
253,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,598,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,586,490 |
|
|
|
460,078 |
|
|
|
315,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,163 |
) |
|
|
2,347,498 |
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
122,708 |
|
|
|
43,132 |
|
|
|
32,705 |
|
|
|
245,289 |
|
|
|
(205,581 |
) |
|
|
238,253 |
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
18,414 |
|
|
$ |
5,128 |
|
|
$ |
3,929 |
|
|
$ |
(122 |
) |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
27,331 |
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
18,039 |
|
|
|
4,613 |
|
|
|
3,536 |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
26,048 |
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
9,929 |
|
|
|
(8,738 |
) |
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
(9,345 |
) |
|
|
(3,707 |
) |
|
|
(2,465 |
) |
|
|
(2,035 |
) |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
(17,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
10,069 |
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
7,772 |
|
|
|
(8,478 |
) |
|
|
12,007 |
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
6,842 |
|
|
$ |
877 |
|
|
$ |
767 |
|
|
$ |
7,741 |
|
|
$ |
(8,478 |
) |
|
$ |
7,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
51,208 |
|
|
$ |
13,469 |
|
|
$ |
10,114 |
|
|
$ |
(1,046 |
) |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
73,727 |
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
49,391 |
|
|
|
12,052 |
|
|
|
9,131 |
|
|
|
(1,046 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
69,510 |
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
3,830 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
25,826 |
|
|
|
(22,392 |
) |
|
|
8,735 |
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
(26,098 |
) |
|
|
(9,603 |
) |
|
|
(7,282 |
) |
|
|
(5,563 |
) |
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
(47,814 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
27,123 |
|
|
|
3,432 |
|
|
|
2,337 |
|
|
|
19,217 |
|
|
|
(21,678 |
) |
|
|
30,431 |
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
8,997 |
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
18,126 |
|
|
$ |
2,120 |
|
|
$ |
1,397 |
|
|
$ |
19,658 |
|
|
$ |
(21,678 |
) |
|
$ |
19,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankWest | |
|
Alliance Bank | |
|
Torrey Pines | |
|
|
|
Intersegment | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
of Nevada | |
|
of Arizona | |
|
Bank | |
|
Other | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Company | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
At September 30, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$ |
1,579,308 |
|
|
$ |
294,704 |
|
|
$ |
244,147 |
|
|
$ |
166,460 |
|
|
$ |
(158,367 |
) |
|
$ |
2,126,252 |
|
|
Gross loans and deferred fees
|
|
|
752,326 |
|
|
|
203,736 |
|
|
|
129,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,085,439 |
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(9,861 |
) |
|
|
(2,905 |
) |
|
|
(1,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
742,465 |
|
|
|
200,831 |
|
|
|
127,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,070,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,253,583 |
|
|
|
232,683 |
|
|
|
217,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,694 |
) |
|
|
1,689,940 |
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
85,959 |
|
|
|
27,651 |
|
|
|
24,245 |
|
|
|
134,557 |
|
|
|
(144,390 |
) |
|
|
128,022 |
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
14,544 |
|
|
$ |
2,686 |
|
|
$ |
2,174 |
|
|
$ |
(404 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
18,997 |
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
13,865 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
17,741 |
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
7,178 |
|
|
|
(6,193 |
) |
|
|
2,619 |
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
(6,916 |
) |
|
|
(2,075 |
) |
|
|
(1,727 |
) |
|
|
(1,143 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(11,740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
8,219 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
5,631 |
|
|
|
(6,075 |
) |
|
|
8,620 |
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
5,496 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
327 |
|
|
$ |
5,564 |
|
|
$ |
(6,075 |
) |
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$ |
38,509 |
|
|
$ |
6,858 |
|
|
$ |
5,663 |
|
|
$ |
(1,032 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
49,996 |
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
37,092 |
|
|
|
5,712 |
|
|
|
5,063 |
|
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
46,833 |
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
3,703 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
16,882 |
|
|
|
(15,435 |
) |
|
|
6,175 |
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
(19,844 |
) |
|
|
(5,803 |
) |
|
|
(4,443 |
) |
|
|
(2,264 |
) |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
(32,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
20,951 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
13,586 |
|
|
|
(15,139 |
) |
|
|
20,952 |
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
6,893 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
14,058 |
|
|
$ |
373 |
|
|
$ |
713 |
|
|
$ |
13,623 |
|
|
$ |
(15,139 |
) |
|
$ |
13,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7. |
Initial Public Offering |
On June 29, 2005, the Companys registration statement
on Form S-1
related to the initial public offering of shares of the
Companys common stock was declared effective. The Company
signed an underwriting agreement on June 29, 2005, which
was on a firm commitment basis, pursuant to which the
underwriters agreed to purchase 3,750,000 shares of
common stock (with an option to
purchase 450,000 shares to cover over-allotments) and
closed the transaction on July 6, 2005.
F-46
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On July 1, 2005, the principal underwriter exercised the
over-allotment to purchase an additional 450,000 shares of
the Companys common stock. The total proceeds related to
the over-allotment (net of offering costs) of $9.3 million
were recorded in July 2005.
The total price to the public for the shares offered and sold by
the Company, including the over-allotment, was
$92.4 million. The amount of expenses incurred by the
Company in connection with the offering includes approximately
$6.0 million of underwriting discounts and commissions and
offering expenses of approximately $1.3 million.
Note. 8. Subsequent
Events
On January 3, 2006, the Company announced a definitive
agreement to acquire Intermountain First Bancorp
(Intermountain), the parent company of Nevada First Bank. At
December 31, 2005, Intermountain had approximately
$459.4 million in assets, $374.2 million in total
loans, $395.5 million in deposits and $31.7 million in
stockholders equity. Under the terms of the agreement,
Intermountain shareholders may elect to receive either
2.44 shares of the Companys common stock or $71.30 in
cash for each Intermountain share, subject to proration and
allocation procedures to ensure that at least 60% of the
outstanding shares of Intermountain common stock will be
exchanged for shares of the Companys common stock. The
total value of the transaction is estimated to be approximately
$110 million.
On January 17, 2006, the Company announced a definitive
agreement to acquire Bank of Nevada. At December 31, 2005,
Bank of Nevada had approximately $283.0 million in assets,
$217.4 million in total loans, $254.4 million on
deposits and $25.6 million in stockholders equity.
Under the terms of the Agreement, Bank of Nevada shareholders
will receive $80.187 in cash for each share of Bank of Nevada
common stock. The total value of the transaction is estimated to
be approximately $74 million.
On January 17, 2006, the Board of Directors approved and
granted 132,500 stock options and 116,250 shares of
restricted stock to various employees. The options have an
exercise price of $29.00, vest over four years at 25% per
year, and expire in 7 years, and the shares of restricted
stock vest over 3 years: 50% on the second anniversary of
the grant date and 50% on the third anniversary of the grant
date.
F-47
Appendix B
RIGHTS OF DISSENTING OWNERS
B-1
RIGHTS OF DISSENTING OWNERS
WEST PUBLISHING CO.
Corporations § 182.4(4) to 182.4(6), 584.
WESTLAW Topic No. 101.
C.J.S. Corporations §§ 347 to 350, 799 to 801.
NRS 92A.300 Definitions. As used in NRS 92A.300 to
92A.500, inclusive, unless the context otherwise requires, the
words and terms defined in NRS 92A.305 to 92A.335,
inclusive, have the meanings ascribed to them in those sections.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2086)
NRS 92A.305 Beneficial stockholder defined.
Beneficial stockholder means a person who is a
beneficial owner of shares held in a voting trust or by a
nominee as the stockholder of record.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS 92A.310 Corporate action defined.
Corporate action means the action of a domestic
corporation.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS 92A315 Dissenter defined.
Dissenter means a stockholder who is entitled to
dissent from a domestic corporations action under
NRS 92A.380 and who exercises that right when and in the
manner required by NRS 92A.400 to 92A.480, inclusive.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087; A 1999, 1631)
NRS 92A.320 Fair value defined.
Fair value, with respect to a dissenters
shares, means the value of the shares immediately before the
effectuation of the corporate action to which he objects,
excluding any appreciation or depreciation in anticipation of
the corporate action unless exclusion would be inequitable.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087)
NEVADA CASES.
Definition. The term fair cash value (now
fair value) as used in the provisions of former
NRS 78.510 (cf. NRS 92A.320 and 92A.380), relating to
payment to dissident former shareholders of a merged
corporation, meant the intrinsic value of the dissenting
shareholders interests determined from the assets and
liabilities of the corporation considered in light of every
factor bearing on value. Southdown, Inc. v. McGinnis,
89 Nev. 184, 510 P.2d 636 (1973), cited, Steiner
Corp v. Benninghoff, 5 F. Supp. 2d 1117, at 1123
(D. Nev. 1998)
FEDERAL AND OTHER CASES.
Determination of fair value. For the purpose of
determining the fair value of shares of stock owned by
stockholders who dissented from a proposed merger (see
NRS 92A.320 and 92A.380), the court considered:
(I) the market value of the shares before the merger,
discounted for illiquidity; (2) the enterprise value of the
corporation as a whole before the merger; (3) the net asset
value of the corporation before the merger; and (4) any
other factor bearing on value. Each measure of value was then
assigned a weight and averaged appropriately. Steiner
Corp. v. Benninghoff, 5 F. Supp. 2d 1117
(D. Nev. 1998)
Dissenting stockholders were entitled to payment for the
proportional interest in the corporation that their shares
represented. In a proceeding to determine the fair value of
shares of stock owned by stockholders who dissented from a
proposed merger (see NRS 92A.320 and 92A.380), the
stockholders were entitled to be compensated for the
proportional interest in the corporation that their shares
represented, and not just for the value of their shares. Steiner
Corp. v. Benninghoff, 5 F. Supp. 2d 1117
(D. Nev. 1998)
B-2
A minority discount or control premium was not used to
determine the fair value of shares. For the purpose of
determining the fair value of shares of stock owned by
stockholders who dissented from a proposed merger (see NRS
92A.320 and 92A.380), the price of the shares was not:
(l) reduced because the shares were traded as part of a
minority block; or (2) increased because the shares were
sold as part of a majority block. Steiner Corp. v.
Benninghoff, 5 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (D. Nev.
1998)
Determination of the market value of shares in a closely held
corporation. In determining the market value of shares of
stock in a closely held corporation for the purpose of paying
the fair value of those shares to dissenting stockholders (see
NRS 92A.320 and 92A.380): (I) the court estimated the
price at which the corporations stock would trade by
comparing the corporation with publicly traded companies in the
same industry; (2) the sum of the value of equity and the
corporations excess cash was divided by the number of
outstanding shares to determine the market value per share; and
(3) the market value was discounted for the shares
illiquidity. Steiner Corp. v. Benninghoff, 5 F. Supp.
2d 1117 (D. Nev. 1998)
Determination of the enterprise value of a corporation;
discounted cash flow method. In determining the enterprise
value of a corporation for the purpose of paying the fair value
of shares of stock owned by dissenting stockholders (see
NRS 92A.320 and 92A.380), the court used the discounted
cash flow method and the acquisitions method to determine that
value and then calculated a weighted average of the values
arrived at using those methods. To arrive at a value using the
discounted cash flow method: (I) the net cash flows that
the corporation would generate for each year of a projected
period were estimated using earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization; (2) the terminal value of
the corporation as of the end of the projected period was
calculated; and (3) the appropriate rate at which to
discount to present value the projected future cash flows and
the projected terminal value was applied. Steiner Corp. v.
Benninghoff, 5 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (D. Nev.
1998)
Net asset value was not used to determine the fair value of
shares of dissenting stockholders. In determining the fair
value of shares of stock owned by stockholders who dissented
from a proposed merger (see NRS 92A.320 and 92A.380), the
court did not consider the net asset value of the corporation
before the merger because the corporation was primarily a
service company and its main assets, such as goodwill, an
assembled and trained workforce, and established lists of
clients. were not tangible. Steiner
Corp. v. Benninghoff, 5 F. Supp. 2d 1117
(D. Nev. 1998)
Previous sale of shares by majority stockholders was not
indicative of fair value. In determining the fair value of
shares of stock owned by stockholders who dissented from a
proposed merger (see NRS 92A.320 and 92A.380), the court
placed no weight on evidence that members of the family of the
majority stockholders had tendered their shares to the
corporation at the price offered by the corporation. Steiner
Corp. v. Benninghoff, 5 F. Supp. 2d 1117
(D. Nev. 1998)
NRS 92A.325 Stockholder defined.
Stockholder means a stockholder of record or a
beneficial stockholder of a domestic corporation.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS 92A.330 Stockholder of record defined.
Stockholder of record means the person in whose
name shares are registered in the records of a domestic
corporation or the beneficial owner of shares to the extent of
the rights granted by a nominees certificate on file with
the domestic corporation.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS 92A.335 Subject corporation defined.
Subject corporation means the domestic
corporation which is the issuer of the shares held by a
dissenter before the corporate action creating the
dissenters rights becomes effective or the surviving or
acquiring entity of that issuer after the corporate action
becomes effective.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS 92A.340 Computation of interest. Interest
payable pursuant to NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive, must
be computed from the effective date of the action until the data
of payment, at the average rate
B-3
currently paid by the entity on its principal bank loans or, if
it has no bank loans, at a rate that is fair and equitable under
all of the circumstances.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087)
FEDERAL AND OTHER CASES.
Computation of interest where the corporation had no bank
loans. In a proceeding brought to determine the fair value
of shares of stock owned by stockholders who dissented from a
proposed merger (see NRS 92A.490), where the corporation
that commenced the proceeding had no bank loans, the prevailing
stockholders were entitled to interest at a rate that was
equivalent to the rate the corporations primary bank would
have charged the corporation for a loan. (See also
NRS 92A.340.) Steiner Corp. v. Benninghoff, 5 F.
Supp. 2d 1117 (D. Nev. 1998)
NRS 92A.350 Rights of dissenting partner of domestic
limited partnership. A partnership agreement of a domestic
limited partnership or, unless otherwise provided in the
partnership agreement, an agreement of merger or exchange, may
provide that contractual rights with respect to the partnership
interest of a dissenting general or limited partner of a
domestic limited partnership are available for any class or
group of partnership interests in connection with any merger or
exchange in which the domestic limited partnership is a
constituent entity.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2088)
NRS 92A.360 Rights of dissenting member of domestic
limited-liability company. The articles of organization or
operating agreement of a domestic limited-liability company or,
unless otherwise provided in the articles of organization or
operating agreement, an agreement of merger or exchange, may
provide that contractual rights with respect to the interest of
a dissenting member are available in connection with any merger
or exchange in which the domestic limited-liability company is a
constituent entity.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2088)
NRS 92A.370 Rights of dissenting member of domestic
nonprofit corporation.
1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, and
unless otherwise provided in the articles or bylaws, any member
of any constituent domestic nonprofit corporation who voted
against the merger may, without prior notice, but within
30 days after the effective date of the merger, resign from
membership and is thereby excused from all contractual
obligations to the constituent or surviving corporations which
did not occur before his resignation and is thereby entitled to
those rights, if any, which would have existed if there had been
no merger and the membership had been terminated or the member
had been expelled.
2. Unless otherwise provided in its articles of
incorporation or bylaws, no member of a domestic nonprofit
corporation, including, but not limited to, a cooperative
corporation, which supplies services described in
chapter 704 of NRS to its members only, and no person who
is a member of a domestic nonprofit corporation as a condition
of or by reason of the ownership of an interest in real
property, may resign and dissent pursuant to subsection 1.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2088)
NRS 92A.380 Right of stockholder to dissent from certain
corporate actions and to obtain payment for shares.
1. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 92A.370 and
92A.390, any stockholder is entitled to dissent from, and obtain
payment of the fair value of his shares in the event of any of
the following corporate actions:
|
|
|
(a) Consummation of a conversion or plan of merger to which
the domestic corporation is a constituent entity: |
|
|
|
(1) If approval by the stockholders is required for the
conversion or merger by NRS 92A.120 to 92A.160, inclusive,
or the articles of incorporation, regardless of whether the
stockholder is entitled to vote on the conversion or plan of
merger; or |
B-4
|
|
|
(2) If the domestic corporation is a subsidiary and is
merged with its parent pursuant to NRS 92A.180. |
|
|
|
(b) Consummation of a plan of exchange to which the
domestic corporation is a constituent entity as the corporation
whose subject owners interests will be acquired, if his
shares are to be acquired in the plan of exchange. |
|
|
(c) Any corporate action taken pursuant to a vote of the
stockholders to the extent that the articles of incorporation,
bylaws or a resolution of the board of directors provides that
voting or nonvoting stockholders are entitled to dissent and
obtain payment for their shares. |
2. A stockholder who is entitled to dissent and obtain
payment pursuant to NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive, may
not challenge the corporate action creating his entitlement
unless the action is unlawful or fraudulent with respect to him
or the domestic corporation.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2087; A 2001, 1414, 3199; 2003, 3189)
WEST PUBLISHING CO.
WESTLAW Topic No. 101.
C.J.S. Corporations 44 348, 350.
NEVADA CASES.
Definition. The term fair cash value (now
fair value) as used in the provisions of former
NRS 78.510 (cf. NRS 92A.320 and 92A.380),
relating to payment to dissident former shareholders of a merged
corporation, meant the intrinsic value of the dissenting
shareholders interests determined from the assets and
liabilities of the corporation considered in light of every
factor bearing on value. Southdown, Inc. v. McGinnis,
89 Nev. 184, 510 P.2d 636 (1973), cited, Steiner Corp.
v. Benninghoff, 5 F. Supp. 2d 1117. at 1123 (D. Nev.
1998)
FEDERAL AND OTHER CASES.
Adequate remedy at law for dissenting stockholders.
Stockholders in a Nevada corporation who opposed a merger with
another corporation could not invoke equity powers of federal
courts to block the merger, in the absence of fraud, because
they had adequate remedy at law under NCL § 1640
(cf. NRS 92A.380) which provides that a dissenting
stockholder may demand and receive the fair cash value of
his shares. Skelly v. Dockweiler, 75 F. Supp. 11
(S.D. Cal. 1947)
Determination of fair value. For the purpose of
determining the fair value of shares of stock owned by
stockholders who dissented from a proposed merger (see
NRS 92A.320 and 92A.380), the court considered:
(1) the market value of the shares before the merger,
discounted for illiquidity; (2) the enterprise value of the
corporation as a whole before the merger: (3) the net asset
value of the corporation before the merger; and (4) any
other factor bearing on value. Each measure of value was then
assigned a weight and averaged appropriately. Steiner Corp. v.
Benninghoff, 5 F. Supp. 2d 1117
(D. Nev. 1998)
Dissenting stockholders were entitled to payment for the
proportional interest in the corporation that their shares
represented. In a proceeding to determine the fair value of
shares of stock owned by stockholders who dissented from a
proposed merger (see NRS 92A.320 and 92A.380), the
stockholders were entitled to be compensated for the
proportional interest in the corporation that their shares
represented, and not just for the value of their shares. Steiner
Corp. v. Benninghoff, 5 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (D. Nev.
1998)
A minority discount or control premium was not used to
determine the fair value of shares. For the purpose of
determining the fair value of shares of stock owned by
stockholders who dissented from a proposed merger (see NRS
92A.320 and 92A.380), the price of the shares was not:
(l) reduced because the shares were traded as part of a
minority block; or (2) increased because the shares were
sold as part of a majority block. Steiner Corp. v.
Benninghoff, 5 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (D. Nev. 1998)
B-5
Determination of the market value of shares in a closely held
corporation. In determining the market value of shares of
stock in a closely held corporation for the purpose of paying
the fair value of those shares to dissenting stockholders (see
NRS 92A.320 and 92A.380): (1) the court estimated the price
at which the corporations stock would trade by comparing
the corporation with publicly traded companies in the same
industry; (2) the sum of the value of equity and the
corporations excess cash was divided by the number of
outstanding shares to determine the market value per share; and
(3) the market value was discounted for the shares
illiquidity. Steiner Corp. v. Benninghoff, 5 F.
Supp. 2d 1117 (D. Nev. 1998)
Determination of the enterprise value of a corporation;
discounted cash flow method. In determining the enterprise
value of a corporation for the purpose of paying the fair value
of shares of stock owned by dissenting stockholders (see NRS
92A.320 and 92A.380), the court used the discounted cash flow
method and the acquisitions method to determine that value and
then calculated a weighted average of the values arrived at
using those methods. To arrive at a value using the discounted
cash flow method: (1) the net cash flows that the
corporation would generate for each year of a projected period
were estimated using earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization; (2) the terminal value of
the corporation as of the end of the projected period was
calculated; and (3) the appropriate rate at which to
discount to present value the projected future cash flows and
the projected terminal value was applied. Steiner Corp. v.
Benninghoff. 5 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (D. Nev. 1998)
Net asset value was not used to determine the fair value of
shares of dissenting stockholders. In determining the fair
value of shares of stock owned by stockholders who dissented
from a proposed merger (see NRS 92A.320 and 92A.380), the
court did not consider the net asset value of the corporation
before the merger because the corporation was primarily a
service company and its main assets, such as goodwill, an
assembled and trained workforce, and established lists of
clients, were not tangible. Steiner Corp. v. Benninghoff,
5 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (D. Nev. 1998)
Previous sale of shares by majority stockholders was not
indicative of fair value. In determining the fair value of
shares of stock owned by stockholders who dissented from a
proposed merger (see NRS 92A.320 and 92A.380), the court
placed no weight on evidence that members of the family of the
majority stockholders had tendered their shares to the
corporation at the price offered by the corporation. Steiner
Corp. v. Benninghoff, 5 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (D. Nev.
1998)
NRS 92A.390 Limitations on right of dissent:
Stockholders of certain classes or series; action of
stockholders not required for plan of merger.
1. There is no right of dissent with respect to a plan of
merger or exchange in favor of stockholders of any class or
series which, at the record date fixed to determine the
stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the
meeting at which the plan of merger or exchange is to be acted
on, were either listed on a national securities exchange,
included in the national market system by the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., or held by at least
2,000 stockholders of record, unless:
|
|
|
(a) The articles of incorporation of the corporation
issuing the shares provide otherwise; or |
|
|
(b) The holders of the class or series are required under
the plan of merger or exchange to accept for the shares anything
except: |
|
|
|
(1) Cash, owners interests or owners interests
and cash in lieu of fractional owners interests of: |
|
|
|
(I) The surviving or acquiring entity; or |
|
|
(II) Any other entity which, at the effective date of the
plan of merger or exchange, were either listed on a national
securities exchange, included in the national market system by
the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., or held of
record by a least 2,000 holders of owners interests of
record; or |
|
|
|
(2) A combination of cash and owners interests of the
kind described in sub-subparagraphs (I) and (H) of
subparagraph (1) of paragraph (b). |
B-6
2. There is no right of dissent for any holders of stock of
the surviving domestic corporation if the plan of merger does
not require action of the stockholders of the surviving domestic
corporation under NRS 92A.130.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2088)
WEST PUBLISHING CO.
Corporations § 584.
WESTLAW Topic No. 101.
C.J.S. Corporations §§ 799 to 801.
NRS 92A.400 Limitations on right of dissent: Assertion
as to portions only to shares registered to stockholder;
assertion by beneficial stockholder.
1. A stockholder of record may assert dissenters
rights as to fewer than all of the shares registered in his name
only if he dissents with respect to all shares beneficially
owned by any one person and notifies the subject corporation in
writing of the name and address of each person on whose behalf
he asserts dissenters rights. The rights of a partial
dissenter under this subsection are determined as if the shares
as to which he dissents and his other shares were registered in
the names of different stockholders.
2. A beneficial stockholder may assert dissenters
rights as to shares held on his behalf only if:
|
|
|
(a) He submits to the subject corporation the written
consent of the stockholder of record to the dissent not later
than the time the beneficial stockholder asserts
dissenters rights; and |
|
|
(b) He does so with respect to all shares of which he is
the beneficial stockholder or over which he has power to direct
the vote. |
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2089)
NRS 92A.410 Notification of stockholders regarding right
of dissent.
1. If a proposed corporate action creating dissenters
rights is submitted to a vote at a stockholders meeting,
the notice of the meeting must state that stockholders are or
may be entitled to assert dissenters rights under
NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive, and be accompanied by a
copy of those sections.
2. If the corporate action creating dissenters rights
is taken by written consent of the stockholders or without a
vote of the stockholders, the domestic corporation shall notify
in writing all stockholders entitled to assert dissenters
rights that the action was taken and send them the
dissenters notice described in NRS 92A.430.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2089; A 1997, 730)
NRS 92A.420 Prerequisites to demand for payment for
shares.
1. If a proposed corporate action creating dissenters
rights is submitted to a vote at a stockholders meeting, a
stockholder who wishes to assert dissenters rights:
|
|
|
(a) Must deliver to the subject corporation, before the
vote is taken, written notice of his intent to demand payment
for his shares if the proposed action is effectuated; and |
|
|
(b) Must not vote his shares in favor of the proposed
action. |
2. A stockholder who does not satisfy the requirements of
subsection 1 and NRS 92A.400 is not entitled to
payment for his shares under this chapter.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2089; 1999, 1631)
NRS 92A.430 Dissenters notice: Delivery to
stockholders entitled to assert rights; contents.
1. If a proposed corporate action creating dissenters
rights is authorized at a stockholders meeting, the
subject corporation shall deliver a written dissenters
notice to all stockholders who satisfied the requirements to
assert those rights.
B-7
2. The dissenters notice must be sent no later than
10 days after the effectuation of the corporate action, and
must:
|
|
|
(a) State where the demand for payment must be sent and
where and when certificates, if any, for shares must be
deposited; |
|
|
(b) Inform the holders of shares not represented by
certificates to what extent the transfer of the shares will be
restricted after the demand for payment is received; |
|
|
(c) Supply a form for demanding payment that includes the
date of the first announcement to the news media or to the
stockholders of the terms of the proposed action and requires
that the person asserting dissenters rights certify
whether or not he acquired beneficial ownership of the shares
before that date; |
|
|
(d) Set a date by which the subject corporation must
receive the demand for payment, which may not be less than 30
nor more than 60 days after the date the notice is
delivered; and |
|
|
(e) Be accompanied by a copy of NRS 92A.300 to
92A.500, inclusive. |
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2089)
NRS 92A.440 Demand for payment and deposit of
certificates; retention of rights of stockholder.
1. A stockholder to whom a dissenters notice is sent
must:
|
|
|
(a) Demand payment; |
|
|
(b) Certify whether he or the beneficial owner on whose
behalf he is dissenting, as the case may be, acquired beneficial
ownership of the shares before the date required to be set forth
in the dissenters notice for this certification; and |
|
|
(c) Deposit his certificates, if any, in accordance with
the terms of the notice. |
2. The stockholder who demands payment and deposits his
certificates, if any, before the proposed corporate action is
taken retains all other rights of a stockholder until those
rights are cancelled or modified by the taking of the proposed
corporate action.
3. The stockholder who does not demand payment or deposit
his certificates where required, each by the date set forth in
the dissenters notice, is not entitled to payment for his
shares under this chapter.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2090; A 1997, 730; 2003, 3189)
NEVADA CASES.
Dissident stockholders entitled to prejudgment interest from
date of demand. In proceeding pursuant to former
NRS 78.510 (cf. NRS 92A.490) by dissident former
shareholders of a merged Nevada corporation to recover the fair
cash value of their shares, the former shareholders were
entitled to recover prejudgment interest on the fair cash value
from the date of demand for payment because, under former
NRS 78.515 (cf. NRS 92A.440), they ceased to be
shareholders and became creditors on the date of demand and, as
creditors, were entitled to interest under NRS 99.040. The
fact that the amount due had not yet been judicially determined
was immaterial. Southdown, Inc. v. McGinnis, 89 Nev.
184, 510 P.2d 636 (1973), cited, Tolotti v.
Eikelberger, 90 Nev. 466, at 468, 530 P.2d 106 (1974),
Lake Tahoe Sailboat Sales & Charter, Inc. v.
Douglas County, 562 F. Supp. 523, at 525 (D. Nev,
1983)
NRS 92A.450 Uncertificated shares: Authority to restrict
transfer after demand for payment; retention of rights of
stockholder.
1. The subject corporation may restrict the transfer of
shares not represented by a certificate from the date the demand
for their payment is received.
B-8
2. The person for whom dissenters rights are asserted
as to shares not represented by a certificate retains all other
rights of a stockholder until those rights are cancelled or
modified by the taking of the proposed corporate action.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2090)
NRS 92A.460 Payment for shares: General requirements.
1. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 92A.470, within
30 days after receipt of a demand for payment, the subject
corporation shall pay each dissenter who complied with
NRS 92A.440 the amount the subject corporation estimates to
be the fair value of his shares, plus accrued interest. The
obligation of the subject corporation under this subsection may
be enforced by the district court:
|
|
|
(a) Of the county where the corporations registered
office is located; or |
|
|
(b) At the election of any dissenter residing or having its
registered office in this state, of the county where the
dissenter resides or has its registered office. The court shall
dispose of the complaint promptly. |
2. The payment must be accompanied by:
|
|
|
(a) The subject corporations balance sheet as of the
end of a fiscal year ending not more than 16 months before
the date of payment, a statement of income for that year, a
statement of changes in the stockholders equity for that
year and the latest available interim financial statements, if
any; |
|
|
(b) A statement of the subject corporations estimate
of the fair value of the shares; |
|
|
(c) An explanation of how the interest was calculated; |
|
|
(d) A statement of the dissenters rights to demand
payment under NRS 92A.480; and |
|
|
(e) A copy of NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive. |
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2090)
NRS 92A.470 Payment for shares: Shares acquired on or
after date of dissenters notice.
1. A subject corporation may elect to withhold payment from
a dissenter unless he was the beneficial owner of the shares
before the date set forth in the dissenters notice as the
date of the first announcement to the news media or to the
stockholders of the terms of the proposed action.
2. To the extent the subject corporation elects to withhold
payment, after taking the proposed action, it shall estimate the
fair value of the shares, plus accrued interest, and shall offer
to pay this amount to each dissenter who agrees to accept it in
full satisfaction of his demand. The subject corporation shall
send with its offer a statement of its estimate of the fair
value of the shares, an explanation of how the interest was
calculated, and a statement of the dissenters right to
demand payment pursuant to NRS 92A.480.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2091)
NRS 92A.480 Dissenters estimate of fair value:
Notification of subject corporation; demand for payment of
estimate.
1. A dissenter may notify the subject corporation in
writing of his own estimate of the fair value of his shares and
the amount of interest due, and demand payment of his estimate,
less any payment pursuant to NRS 92A.460, or reject the
offer pursuant to NRS 92A.470 and demand payment of the
fair value of his shares and interest due, if he believes that
the amount paid pursuant to NRS 92A.460 or offered pursuant
to NRS 92A.470 is less than the fair value of his shares or
that the interest due is incorrectly calculated.
2. A dissenter waives his right to demand payment pursuant
to this section unless he notifies the subject corporation of
his demand in writing within 30 days after the subject
corporation made or offered payment for his shares.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2091)
B-9
NRS 92A.490 Legal proceeding to determine fair value: Duties
of subject corporation; powers of court; rights of dissenter.
1. If a demand for payment remains unsettled, the subject
corporation shall commence a proceeding within 60 days
after receiving the demand and petition the court to determine
the fair value of the shares and accrued interest. If the
subject corporation does not commence the proceeding within the
60-day period, it shall pay each dissenter whose demand remains
unsettled the amount demanded.
2. A subject corporation shall commence the proceeding in
the district court of the county where its registered office is
located. If the subject corporation is a foreign entity without
a resident agent in the state, it shall commence the proceeding
in the county where the registered office of the domestic
corporation merged with or whose shares were acquired by the
foreign entity was located.
3. The subject corporation shall make all dissenters,
whether or not residents of Nevada, whose demands remain
unsettled, parties to the proceeding as in an action against
their shares. All parties must be served with a copy of the
petition. Nonresidents may be served by registered or certified
mail or by publication as provided by law.
4. The jurisdiction of the court in which the proceeding is
commenced under subsection 2 is plenary and exclusive. The
court may appoint one or more persons as appraisers to receive
evidence and recommend a decision on the question of fair value.
The appraisers have the powers described in the order appointing
them, or any amendment thereto. The dissenters are entitled to
the same discovery rights as parties in other civil proceedings.
5. Each dissenter who is made a party to the proceeding is
entitled to a judgment:
|
|
|
(a) For the amount, if any, by which the court finds the
fair value of his shares, plus interest, exceeds the amount paid
by the subject corporation; or |
|
|
(b) For the fair value, plus accrued interest, of his
after-acquired shares for which the subject corporation elected
to withhold payment pursuant to NRS 92A.470. |
|
|
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2091) |
WEST PUBLISHING CO.
Corporations § 182.4(6).
WESTLAW Topic No. 101.
C.J.S. Corporations H 349, 350.
NEVADA CASES.
Findings of appraisers not disturbed unless clearly
wrong. On appeal from judgment confirming the appraisal of
stock of a merged corporation in a proceeding under the
provisions of former NRS 78.510 (cf. NRS 92A.490)
by dissident former shareholders to recover the value of their
shares, the findings of appraisers would not be disturbed unless
clearly wrong. Southdown, Inc. v. McGinnis,
89 Nev. 184, 510 P.2d 636 (1973)
Dissident stockholders entitled to prejudgment interest from
date of demand. In proceeding pursuant to the provisions of
former NRS 78.510 (cf. NRS 92A.490) by dissident former
shareholders of a merged Nevada corporation to recover the fair
cash value of their shares, former shareholders were entitled to
recover prejudgment interest on fair cash value from the date of
demand for payment because, under former NRS 78.515 (cf.
NRS 92A.440), they ceased to be shareholders and became
creditors on date of demand and, as creditors, were entitled to
interest under NRS 99.040. Fact that the amount due had not yet
been judicially determined was immaterial. Southdown, Inc.
v. McGinnis, 89 Nev. 184, 510 P.2d 636 (1973), cited,
Tolotti v. Eikelberger, 90 Nev. 466, at 468, 530 P.2d 106
(1974), Lake Tahoe Sailboat Sales & Charter, Inc. v.
Douglas County, 562 F. Supp. 523, at 525 (D. Nev. 1983)
B-10
FEDERAL AND OTHER CASES.
Computation of interest where the corporation had no bank
loans. In a proceeding brought to determine the fair value
of shares of stock owned by stockholders who dissented from a
proposed merger (see NRS 92A.490), where the
corporation that commenced the proceeding had no bank loans, the
prevailing stockholders were entitled to interest at a rate that
was equivalent to the rate the corporations primary bank
would have charged the corporation for a loan. (See also NRS
92A.340.) Steiner Corp. v. Benninghoff,
5 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (D. Nev. 1998)
NRS 92A.500 Legal proceeding to determine fair value:
Assessment of costs and fees.
1. The court in a proceeding to determine fair value shall
determine all of the costs of the proceeding, including the
reasonable compensation and expenses of any appraisers appointed
by the court. The court shall assess the costs against the
subject corporation, except that the court may assess costs
against all or some of the dissenters, in amounts the court
finds equitable, to the extent the court finds the dissenters
acted arbitrarily, vexatiously or not in good faith in demanding
payment.
2. The court may also assess the fees and expenses of the
counsel and experts for the respective parties, in amounts the
court finds equitable:
|
|
|
(a) Against the subject corporation and in favor of all
dissenters if the court finds the subject corporation did not
substantially comply with the requirements of NRS 92A.300 to
92A.500, inclusive; or |
|
|
(b) Against either the subject corporation or a dissenter
in favor of any other party, if the court finds that the party
against whom the fees and expenses are assessed acted
arbitrarily, vexatiously or not in good faith with respect to
the rights provided by NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive. |
3. If the court finds that the services of counsel for any
dissenter were of substantial benefit to other dissenters
similarly situated, and that the fees for those services should
not be assessed against the subject corporation, the court may
award to those counsel reasonable fees to be paid out of the
amounts awarded to the dissenters who were benefited.
4. In a proceeding commenced pursuant to NRS 92A.460, the
court may assess the costs against the subject corporation,
except that the court may assess costs against all or some of
the dissenters who are parties to the proceeding, in amounts the
court finds equitable, to the extent the court finds that such
parties did not act in good faith in instituting the proceeding.
5. This section does not preclude any party in a proceeding
commenced pursuant to NRS 92A.460 or 92A.490 from applying
the provisions of N.R.C.P. 68 or NRS 17.115.
(Added to NRS by 1995, 2092)
B-11
PART II:
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 20. |
Indemnification of Directors and Officers |
Article V of Western Alliances amended and restated
articles of incorporation provides that, to the fullest extent
permitted by applicable law as then in effect, no director or
officer shall be personally liable to the company or any
stockholder for damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a
director or officer, except for (i) acts or omissions which
involve intentional misconduct, fraud, or a knowing violation of
law or (ii) the payment of dividends in violation of Nevada
Revised Statues § 78.300.
Article IV of Western Alliances amended and restated
bylaws provides for indemnification of its directors, officers,
employees and other agents and advancement of expenses. As
permitted by the Nevada Revised Statues, Western Alliances
bylaws provide that the company will indemnify a director or
officer if the individual acted in good faith in a manner which
he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal
action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his
conduct was unlawful. The Nevada Revised Statues do not permit
indemnification as to any claim, issue or matter as to which
such person has been adjudged by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be liable to the corporation, or for amounts
paid in settlement to the corporation, unless and only to the
extent that the court in which the action or suit was brought
determines upon application that in view of all of the
circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the court deems
proper. In addition, Western Alliances bylaws provide that
indemnification shall not be made to or on behalf of any
director or officer if a final adjudication establishes that his
or her acts or omissions involved intentional misconduct, fraud,
or a knowing violation of the law and were material to the cause
of action.
Western Alliance has entered into indemnification agreements
with certain of its directors and executive officers in addition
to indemnification provided for in its bylaws. Western Alliance
maintains, on behalf of its directors and officers, insurance
protection against certain liabilities arising out of the
discharge of their duties, as well as insurance covering Western
Alliance for indemnification payments made to its directors and
officers for certain liabilities. The premiums for such
insurance are paid by Western Alliance.
|
|
Item 21. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
(a) The exhibits required by this item are set forth on the
Exhibit Index attached hereto.
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
|
|
|
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are
being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration
statement: |
|
|
|
(i) To include any prospectus required by
Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933; |
|
|
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events
arising after the effective date of the registration statement
(or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which,
individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change
in the information set forth in the registration statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in
volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of
securities offered would not exceed that which was registered)
and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to
Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and
price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum
aggregate offering price set forth in the Calculation of
Registration Fee table in the effective registration
statement; |
II-1
|
|
|
(iii) To include any material information with respect to
the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the
registration statement or any material change in such
information in the registration statement. |
|
|
|
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective
amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof. |
|
|
(3) To remove from registration by means of a
post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered
which remain unsold at the termination of the offering. |
(b) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for
purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act,
each filing of the registrants annual report pursuant to
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an
employee benefit plans annual report pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that
is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall
be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the
securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide
offering thereof.
(c) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to deliver
or cause to be delivered with the prospectus, to each person to
whom the prospectus is sent or given, the latest annual report
to security holders that is incorporated by reference in the
prospectus and furnished pursuant to and meeting the
requirements of
Rule 14a-3 or
Rule 14c-3 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and, where interim
financial information required to be presented by Article 3
of Regulation S-X
are not set forth in the prospectus, to deliver, or cause to be
delivered to each person to whom the prospectus is sent or
given, the latest quarterly report that is specifically
incorporated by reference in the prospectus to provide such
interim financial information.
|
|
|
(1) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes as
follows: that prior to any public reoffering of the securities
registered hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part
of this registration statement, by any person or party who is
deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of
Rule 145(c), the issuer undertakes that such reoffering
prospectus will contain the information called for by the
applicable registration form with respect to reofferings by
persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the
information called for by the other items of the applicable form. |
|
|
(2) The registrant undertakes that every prospectus
(i) that is filed pursuant to
paragraph (1) immediately preceding, or (ii) that
purports to meet the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of
the Act and is used in connection with an offering of securities
subject to Rule 415, will be filed as a part of an
amendment to the registration statement and will not be used
until such amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each
such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
(e) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be
governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
II-2
(f) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to respond
to requests for information that is incorporated by reference
into the prospectus pursuant to Items 4, 10(b), 11 or 13 of
this Form, within one business day of receipt of such request,
and to send the incorporated documents by first class mail or
other equally prompt means. This includes information contained
in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of the
registration statement through the date of responding to the
request.
(g) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to supply
by means of a post-effective amendment all information
concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired
involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in
the registration statement when it became effective.
II-3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Las Vegas, State of Nevada, on
March 3, 2006.
|
|
|
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Sarver |
|
Chairman of the Board; President and |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in their listed capacities on March 3, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert Sarver
Robert Sarver |
|
Chairman of the Board; President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ Dale Gibbons
Dale Gibbons |
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ Terry A. Shirey
Terry A. Shirey |
|
Senior Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting
Officer) |
|
|
|
Paul Baker |
|
Director |
|
|
|
*
Bruce Beach |
|
Director |
|
|
|
William S. Boyd |
|
Director |
|
|
|
Steve Hilton |
|
Director |
|
|
|
*
Marianne Boyd Johnson |
|
Director |
|
|
|
*
Cary Mack |
|
Director |
|
|
|
*
Arthur Marshall |
|
Director |
|
|
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Todd Marshall |
|
Director |
|
|
|
*
M. Nafees Nagy, M.D. |
|
Director |
|
|
|
*
James Nave, D.V.M |
|
Director |
|
|
|
*
Edward Nigro |
|
Director |
|
|
|
Donald Snyder |
|
Director |
|
|
|
*
Larry Woodrum |
|
Director |
|
|
|
*By
Dale
Gibbons,
Attorney-In-Fact |
|
|
II-5
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 30, 2005
between Western Alliance Bancorporation and Intermountain First
Bancorp (included as Appendix A to this joint proxy statement/
prospectus) |
|
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by
reference to Western Alliances Registration Statement on
Form S-1, File No. 333-124406, filed with the SEC on
June 7, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to
Western Alliances Registration Statement on Form S-1,
File No. 333-124406, filed with the SEC on June 7,
2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Form of common stock certificate (incorporated by reference to
Western Alliances Registration Statement on Form S-1,
File No. 333-124406, filed with the SEC on June 27,
2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
5 |
.1 |
|
Opinion of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. |
|
|
8 |
.1 |
|
Tax Opinion of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. |
|
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Western Alliance Bancorporation 2005 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Western Alliances
Registration Statement on Form S-1, File
No. 333-124406, filed with the SEC on June 7, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Form of Western Alliance Bancorporation 2005 Stock Incentive
Plan Agreement (incorporated by reference to Western
Alliances Registration Statement on Form S-1, File
No. 333-124406, filed with the SEC on June 7, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
10 |
.3 |
|
Form of BankWest of Nevada Incentive Stock Option Plan Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Western Alliances
Registration Statement on Form S-1, File
No. 333-124406, filed with the SEC on April 28, 2005
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
10 |
.4 |
|
Form of Western Alliance Incentive Stock Option Plan Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Western Alliances
Registration Statement on Form S-1, File
No. 333-124406, filed with the SEC on April 28, 2005
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
10 |
.5 |
|
Form of Western Alliance 2002 Stock Option Plan Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Western Alliances
Registration Statement on Form S-1, File
No. 333-124406, filed with the SEC on April 28, 2005
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
10 |
.6 |
|
Form of Western Alliance 2002 Stock Option Plan Agreement (with
double trigger acceleration clause) (incorporated by reference
to Western Alliances Registration Statement on
Form S-1, File No. 333-124406, filed with the SEC on
April 28, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between Western
Alliance Bancorporation and the following directors and
officers: Messrs. Boyd, Froeschle, Lundy, A. Marshall,
Nagy, Sarver, Snyder and Woodrum, Drs. Nagy and Nave, and
Mses. Boyd Johnson and Mahan (incorporated by reference to
Western Alliances Registration Statement on Form S-1,
File No. 333-124406, filed with the SEC on April 28,
2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
10 |
.8 |
|
Form of Non-Competition Agreement by and between Western
Alliance Bancorporation and the following directors and
officers: Messrs. Froeschle, Sarver, Lundy, Snyder and
Woodrum (incorporated by reference to Western Alliances
Registration Statement on Form S-1, File
No. 333-124406, filed with the SEC on April 28, 2005
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
10 |
.9 |
|
Form of Warrant to purchase shares of Western Alliance
Bancorporation common stock, dated December 12, 2002,
together with a schedule of warrantholders (incorporated by
reference to Western Alliances Registration Statement on
Form S-1, File No. 333-124406, filed with the SEC on
April 28, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
10 |
.10 |
|
Directors Fee Schedule (incorporated by reference to Western
Alliances Registration Statement on Form S-1, File
No. 333-124406, filed with the SEC on April 28, 2005
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Summary of Compensation Arrangements with Named Executive
Officers. |
II-6
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.12** |
|
Support Agreement dated as of December 30, 2005 by and
among Western Alliance Bancorporation and certain shareholders
of Intermountain First Bancorp named therein. |
|
|
10 |
.13** |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated January 16, 2006 by and
between Western Alliance Corporation and Bank of Nevada. |
|
|
21 |
.1 |
|
List of Subsidiaries of Western Alliance Bancorporation
(incorporated by reference to Western Alliances
Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-124406,
filed with the SEC on April 28, 2005 and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of McGladrey & Pullen LLP |
|
|
23 |
.2 |
|
Consents of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. (included in
Exhibit 5.1 and 8.1) |
|
|
24 |
.1 |
|
Power of Attorney (previously included on the signature pages of
the Form S-4 filed February 15, 2006) |
|
|
99 |
.1 |
|
Proxy for Special Meeting of Stockholders of Intermountain First
Bancorp |
II-7