10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: March 31, 2009
Commission file number: 0-51557
Investors Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
22-3493930 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
101 JFK Parkway, Short Hills, New Jersey 07078
(Address of principal executive offices)
(973) 924-5100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all the reports to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act) Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
As of April 30, 2009 there were 109,052,929 shares of the Registrants common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, outstanding, of which 64,844,373 shares, or 59.46% of the Registrants outstanding
common stock, were held by Investors Bancorp, MHC, the Registrants mutual holding company.
Investors Bancorp, Inc.
FORM 10-Q
Index
2
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
INVESTORS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
322,469 |
|
|
|
22,823 |
|
Securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value |
|
|
166,584 |
|
|
|
203,032 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity, net (estimated fair value of
$948,896 and $1,198,053 at March 31, 2009
and June 30, 2008, respectively) |
|
|
930,349 |
|
|
|
1,255,054 |
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
|
5,560,678 |
|
|
|
4,670,150 |
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
37,220 |
|
|
|
9,814 |
|
Stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
|
69,574 |
|
|
|
60,935 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
32,535 |
|
|
|
27,716 |
|
Office properties and equipment, net |
|
|
34,894 |
|
|
|
29,710 |
|
Net deferred tax asset |
|
|
108,214 |
|
|
|
40,702 |
|
Bank owned life insurance contract |
|
|
98,409 |
|
|
|
96,170 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
5,907 |
|
|
|
3,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
7,366,833 |
|
|
|
6,419,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
4,770,178 |
|
|
|
3,970,275 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
1,755,562 |
|
|
|
1,563,583 |
|
Advance payments
by borrowers for taxes
and insurance |
|
|
24,015 |
|
|
|
21,829 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
50,219 |
|
|
|
34,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,599,974 |
|
|
|
5,590,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000
authorized shares;
none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock,
$0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized;
118,020,280 issued; 109,052,929 and 109,010,756 outstanding
at March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital |
|
|
522,126 |
|
|
|
514,613 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
415,612 |
|
|
|
486,244 |
|
Treasury stock,
at cost; 8,967,351 and 9,009,524 shares at
March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively |
|
|
(128,121 |
) |
|
|
(128,977 |
) |
Unallocated
common stock held
by
the employee stock
ownership plan |
|
|
(36,514 |
) |
|
|
(37,578 |
) |
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(6,776 |
) |
|
|
(6,296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
766,859 |
|
|
|
828,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
7,366,833 |
|
|
|
6,419,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
INVESTORS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Interest and dividend income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable and loans held-for-sale |
|
$ |
76,723 |
|
|
|
57,605 |
|
|
|
225,494 |
|
|
|
168,262 |
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
4,024 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
11,946 |
|
|
|
15,346 |
|
|
|
38,219 |
|
|
|
48,717 |
|
Equity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
Municipal bonds and other debt |
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
7,372 |
|
|
|
8,773 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and dividend income |
|
|
92,749 |
|
|
|
78,160 |
|
|
|
274,696 |
|
|
|
233,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
33,900 |
|
|
|
38,395 |
|
|
|
96,837 |
|
|
|
118,206 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
17,691 |
|
|
|
12,887 |
|
|
|
55,053 |
|
|
|
41,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
51,591 |
|
|
|
51,282 |
|
|
|
151,890 |
|
|
|
159,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
41,158 |
|
|
|
26,878 |
|
|
|
122,806 |
|
|
|
73,731 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
2,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision
for loan losses |
|
|
33,158 |
|
|
|
25,881 |
|
|
|
101,806 |
|
|
|
70,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income (loss) : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees and service charges |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
Income on bank owned life insurance contracts |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
3,016 |
|
Gain on sales of mortgage loans, net |
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
2,229 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
Gain (loss) on securities transactions, net |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(157,969 |
) |
|
|
(241 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
3,417 |
|
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
(150,841 |
) |
|
|
5,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and fringe benefits |
|
|
15,670 |
|
|
|
13,998 |
|
|
|
45,413 |
|
|
|
40,268 |
|
Advertising and promotional expense |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
Office occupancy and equipment expense |
|
|
2,998 |
|
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
|
8,540 |
|
|
|
8,052 |
|
Federal deposit insurance premiums |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
Stationery, printing, supplies and telephone |
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
Legal, audit, accounting, and supervisory examination fees |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
1,616 |
|
Data processing service fees |
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
3,348 |
|
|
|
3,375 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
3,466 |
|
|
|
3,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses |
|
|
24,455 |
|
|
|
20,634 |
|
|
|
69,636 |
|
|
|
60,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
12,120 |
|
|
|
7,382 |
|
|
|
(118,671 |
) |
|
|
16,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
5,042 |
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
(48,281 |
) |
|
|
6,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
7,078 |
|
|
|
4,535 |
|
|
|
(70,390 |
) |
|
|
10,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
(0.68 |
) |
|
|
0.10 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
104,192,971 |
|
|
|
104,697,317 |
|
|
|
103,977,771 |
|
|
|
105,809,536 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
104,228,891 |
|
|
|
104,780,465 |
|
|
|
103,977,771 |
|
|
|
105,953,418 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
INVESTORS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
Nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
stockholders |
|
|
|
stock |
|
|
capital |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
stock |
|
|
Held by ESOP |
|
|
loss |
|
|
equity |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
|
506,026 |
|
|
|
470,205 |
|
|
|
(70,973 |
) |
|
|
(38,996 |
) |
|
|
(7,935 |
) |
|
|
858,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,550 |
|
Change in funded status of postretirement
plan due to plan curtailment and settlement,
net of tax expense of $891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
Change in funded status of retirement
obligations, net of tax expense of $54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Unrealized gain on securities available-
for-sale, net of tax expense of $1,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses
included in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cummulative effect adjustment
upon adoption of FIN-48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock (3,470,200 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,920 |
) |
Treasury stock allocated to restricted stock plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,830 |
) |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
2,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation cost for stock
options and restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,215 |
|
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released |
|
|
|
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
|
511,860 |
|
|
|
480,766 |
|
|
|
(116,774 |
) |
|
|
(37,932 |
) |
|
|
(4,101 |
) |
|
|
834,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
|
514,613 |
|
|
|
486,244 |
|
|
|
(128,977 |
) |
|
|
(37,578 |
) |
|
|
(6,296 |
) |
|
|
828,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,390 |
) |
Change in funded status of retirement
obligations, net of tax benefit of $81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
Unrealized loss on securities available-
for-sale, net of tax benefit of $303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(821 |
) |
|
|
(821 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses
included in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,870 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock (82,827 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
Treasury stock allocated to restricted stock plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation cost for stock
options and restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,953 |
|
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released |
|
|
|
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
|
522,126 |
|
|
|
415,612 |
|
|
|
(128,121 |
) |
|
|
(36,514 |
) |
|
|
(6,776 |
) |
|
|
766,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
INVESTORS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(70,390 |
) |
|
|
10,550 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESOP and stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
10,288 |
|
|
|
8,728 |
|
Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on securities, net |
|
|
(895 |
) |
|
|
800 |
|
Amortization of premium and accretion of fees and costs on loans, net |
|
|
3,755 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
2,946 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of office properties and equipment |
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
2,090 |
|
Loss on securities, net |
|
|
157,969 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
Mortgage loans originated for sale |
|
|
(437,142 |
) |
|
|
(59,982 |
) |
Proceeds from mortgage loan sales |
|
|
411,965 |
|
|
|
57,136 |
|
Gain on sales of mortgage loans, net |
|
|
(2,229 |
) |
|
|
(466 |
) |
Increase in bank owned life insurance contract |
|
|
(2,239 |
) |
|
|
(3,016 |
) |
Increase in accrued interest |
|
|
(4,819 |
) |
|
|
(1,718 |
) |
Deferred tax benefit |
|
|
(67,131 |
) |
|
|
(1,639 |
) |
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(2,871 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
Increase in other liabilities |
|
|
15,107 |
|
|
|
3,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
104,387 |
|
|
|
9,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
33,997 |
|
|
|
20,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of loans receivable |
|
|
(973,835 |
) |
|
|
(467,362 |
) |
Net originations (pay down) of loans receivable |
|
|
58,552 |
|
|
|
(22,647 |
) |
Purchases of debt securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,117 |
) |
Purchases of other investments available-for-sale |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
Proceeds from paydowns/maturities on mortgage-backed
securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
149,079 |
|
|
|
178,178 |
|
Proceeds from calls/maturities on debt securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
19,643 |
|
|
|
73,508 |
|
Proceeds from paydowns/maturities on mortgage-backed
securities available-for-sale |
|
|
33,928 |
|
|
|
43,087 |
|
Redemption of equity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from redemptions of Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
50,762 |
|
|
|
21,323 |
|
Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
(59,401 |
) |
|
|
(29,282 |
) |
Purchases of office properties and equipment |
|
|
(6,813 |
) |
|
|
(2,869 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(727,322 |
) |
|
|
(230,581 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits |
|
|
799,903 |
|
|
|
215,148 |
|
Net decrease in funds borrowed under short-term repurchase agreements |
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
|
|
(160,000 |
) |
Proceeds from funds borrowed under other repurchase agreements |
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
590,000 |
|
Repayments of funds borrowed under other repurchase agreements |
|
|
(145,000 |
) |
|
|
(80,000 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in other borrowings |
|
|
306,979 |
|
|
|
(233,121 |
) |
Net increase in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
|
|
2,186 |
|
|
|
1,690 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
|
|
(47,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
992,971 |
|
|
|
285,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
299,646 |
|
|
|
75,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
|
|
22,823 |
|
|
|
35,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
|
$ |
322,469 |
|
|
|
111,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
150,747 |
|
|
|
156,942 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
10,415 |
|
|
|
2,194 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
INVESTORS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements are comprised of the accounts of Investors Bancorp, Inc. and
its wholly owned subsidiary, Investors Savings Bank (Bank) (collectively, the Company) and the
Banks wholly-owned significant subsidiaries, ISB Mortgage Company LLC and ISB Asset Corporation.
On June 6, 2008, the Company completed its merger of Summit Federal Bankshares, Inc. (Summit
Federal). This transaction involved the combination of mutual enterprises and, therefore, was
accounted for as a pooling of interests. All financial information has been restated to include
amounts for Summit Federal, based on historical costs, for all periods presented.
In the opinion of management, all the adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring adjustments)
necessary for the fair presentation of the consolidated financial condition and the consolidated
results of operations for the unaudited periods presented have been included. The results of
operations and other data presented for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2009.
Certain information and note disclosures usually included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the
preparation of the Form 10-Q. The consolidated financial statements presented should be read in
conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated
financial statements included in the Companys June 30, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2. Mergers and Acquisitions
On December 15, 2008, the Company announced the signing of a definitive agreement under which the
Company will acquire American Bancorp of New Jersey, a community bank with $667 million in assets,
$499 million in deposits and five branches in Essex and Passaic Counties. On April 14, 2009 the
Company announced it received all of the necessary regulatory approvals to proceed with the
acquisition of American Bancorp. American Bancorps annual meeting of
shareholders, at which their shareholders will vote on the acquisition, is scheduled to be held on
May 19, 2009. If shareholder approval is received, the merger is scheduled to close on or about May
29, 2009.
3. Earnings Per Share
The following is a summary of our earnings per share calculations and reconciliation of basic to
diluted earnings per share.
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
7,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
7,078 |
|
|
|
104,192,971 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
4,535 |
|
|
|
104,697,317 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive common stock
equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
7,078 |
|
|
|
104,228,891 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
4,535 |
|
|
|
104,780,465 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
$ |
(70,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income available to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
(70,390 |
) |
|
|
103,977,771 |
|
|
$ |
(0.68 |
) |
|
$ |
10,550 |
|
|
|
105,809,536 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive common stock
equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income available to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
(70,390 |
) |
|
|
103,977,771 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
10,550 |
|
|
|
105,953,418 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
4. Loans Receivable, Net
Loans receivable, net are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Residential mortgage loans |
|
$ |
4,605,008 |
|
|
|
4,009,563 |
|
Multi-family and commercial |
|
|
496,308 |
|
|
|
225,154 |
|
Construction loans |
|
|
315,151 |
|
|
|
260,177 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
158,258 |
|
|
|
168,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
5,574,725 |
|
|
|
4,663,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums on purchased loans, net |
|
|
23,462 |
|
|
|
22,622 |
|
Deferred loan fees, net |
|
|
(2,968 |
) |
|
|
(2,620 |
) |
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(34,541 |
) |
|
|
(13,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
$ |
5,560,678 |
|
|
|
4,670,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Deposits
Deposits are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Savings acounts |
|
$ |
611,750 |
|
|
|
417,196 |
|
Checking accounts |
|
|
886,264 |
|
|
|
401,100 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
315,357 |
|
|
|
229,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
1,813,371 |
|
|
|
1,047,314 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
2,956,807 |
|
|
|
2,922,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,770,178 |
|
|
|
3,970,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Equity Incentive Plan
During the nine months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded $9.0 million of share-based
expense, comprised of stock option expense of $3.7 million and restricted stock expense of $5.2
million.
During the nine months ended March 31, 2009, 365,000 options with an exercise price of $13.69 and a
grant date fair value of $4.07 were granted and 7,500 options with an exercise price of $15.35 and
a grant date fair value of $4.10 were forfeited. At March 31, 2009, 5,136,752
options, with a weighted average exercise price of $15.02 and a weighted average grant date fair
value of $4.11, were outstanding, of which 3,037,149 were unvested. Expected future expense
relating to the 3.0 million non-vested options outstanding as of March 31, 2009 is $10.8 million
over a weighted average period of 2.98 years.
During the nine months ended March 31, 2009, 125,000 shares of restricted stock with a grant date
fair value of $13.69 were granted and 465,249 shares with a
9
weighted average grant date fair value
of $15.08 were vested. At March 31, 2009, 1,130,063 shares of restricted stock, with a weighted
average grant date fair value of $14.92, are unvested. Expected future compensation expense
relating to the 1.1 million restricted shares at March 31, 2009 is $14.5 million over a weighted
average period of 3.0 years.
7. Net Periodic Benefit Plans Expense
The Company has a Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan (SERP). The SERP is a nonqualified, defined
benefit plan which provides benefits to all employees of the Company if their benefits and/or
contributions under the pension plan are limited by the Internal Revenue Code. The Company also has
a nonqualified, defined benefit plan which provides benefits to its directors. The SERP and the
Directors plan are unfunded and the costs of the plans are recognized over the period that
services are provided. Effective December 31, 2006, the Company limited participation in the
Directors plan to the current participants and placed a cap on directors fees for plan purposes
at the December 31, 2006 rate.
The Company also provided (i) postretirement health care benefits to retired employees hired prior
to April 1991 who attained at least ten years of service and (ii) certain life insurance benefits
to all retired employees. During the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company curtailed the benefits
to current employees and settled its obligations to retired employees.
The components of net periodic benefit expense are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
SERP and Directors Plan |
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Amortization of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic
benefit expense |
|
$ |
426 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
SERP and Directors Plan |
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
Amortization of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic
benefit expense |
|
$ |
1,276 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Due to the unfunded nature of these plans, no contributions are expected to be made to the SERP and
Directors plans and other benefit plans in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009.
The Company also maintains a defined benefit pension plan. Since it is a multiemployer plan, costs
of the pension plan are based on contributions required to be made to the pension plan. The Company
contributed $1,151,000 to the defined benefit pension plan during the first nine months of fiscal
year 2009. We anticipate contributing funds to the plan to meet any minimum funding requirements.
Summit Federal, at the time of merger, had a funded non-contributory defined benefit pension plan
covering all eligible employees, an unfunded non-qualified defined benefit SERP for the benefit of
certain key employees and a postretirement life insurance benefit plan for the benefit of key
employees. At March 31, 2009, the pension plan, SERP plan and postretirement life insurance plan
had an accrued liability of $868,000, $951,000 and $352,000, respectively. At March 31, 2009, the
charges recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss for the pension plan, the SERP plan and
the postretirement life insurance plan were $1,208,000, $215,000 and $173,000, respectively. For
the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the expense related to these plans was $263,000 and
$170,000, respectively.
8. Income Taxes
Effective July 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, or FIN 48, which clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure
and transition. The provisions of FIN 48 are to be applied to all tax positions upon initial
adoption of this standard. Tax positions must meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold
at the effective date in order for the related tax benefits to be recognized or continue to be
recognized upon adoption of FIN 48. As a result of the adoption of FIN 48, the Company recognized a
$300,000 decrease in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for as an
addition to the July 1, 2007, balance of retained earnings. The Company recognizes accrued interest
and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits, where applicable, in income tax expense.
The Company files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and in the state of
New Jersey jurisdiction. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to federal and state income
tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2003. Currently, the Company is not under
examination by any taxing authority.
9. Fair Value Measurements
Effective July 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 157
Fair Value Measurements and related interpretations, which defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No.
157 applies only to fair value measurements already required or permitted by other accounting
standards and does not impose requirements for additional fair value measures. SFAS No. 157 was
issued to increase consistency and comparability in reporting fair values. Our adoption of SFAS No.
157 did not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
11
The following disclosures, which include certain disclosures which are generally not required in
interim period financial statements, are included herein as a result of our adoption of SFAS No.
157.
We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities
and to determine fair value disclosures. Our securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair
value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, we may be required to record at fair
value other assets or liabilities on a non-recurring basis, such as held-to-maturity securities,
mortgage servicing rights, or MSR, loans receivable and real estate owned, or REO. These
non-recurring fair value adjustments involve the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting
or write-downs of individual assets. Additionally, in connection with our mortgage banking
activities we have commitments to fund loans held for sale and commitments to sell loans, which are
considered free-standing derivative instruments, the fair values of which are not material to our
financial condition or results of operations.
In accordance with SFAS No. 157, we group our assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels,
based on the markets in which the assets are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to
determine fair value. These levels are:
|
|
Level 1 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical
instruments traded in active markets. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar
instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar
instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation
techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the
market. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use
significant assumptions not observable in the market. These
unobservable assumptions reflect our own estimates of assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Valuation techniques include the use of option pricing models,
discounted cash flow models and similar techniques. The results cannot
be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale
or immediate settlement of the asset or liability. |
|
We base our fair values on the price that would likely be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
SFAS No. 157 requires us to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value on
a recurring basis.
Securities available-for-sale
Our available-for-sale portfolio is carried at estimated fair value on a recurring basis, with any
unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income/loss
in stockholders equity. Approximately 99% of our securities available-for-sale portfolio consists
of mortgage-backed securities. The fair values of these securities are obtained from an independent
nationally recognized pricing service. Our independent pricing service provides us with prices
which are categorized as Level 2, as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are
generally not available for the majority of securities in our portfolio. Various
modeling techniques are used to determine pricing for our mortgage-backed securities, including
option pricing and discounted cash flow models. The inputs to these models include benchmark
12
yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark
securities, bids, offers and reference data. The remaining 1% of our securities available-for-sale
portfolio is comprised primarily of private fund investments for which the issuer provides us
prices which are categorized as Level 2, as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
are generally not available.
The following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine the carrying
value of our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
165,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
166,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value on
a non-recurring basis.
Securities held-to-maturity
Our held-to-maturity portfolio, consisting primarily of mortgage backed securities and other debt
securities for which we have a positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, is carried at
amortized cost. We conduct a periodic review and evaluation of the held-to-maturity portfolio to
determine if the value of any security has declined below its cost or amortized cost, and whether
such decline is other-than-temporary. Management utilizes various inputs to determine the fair
value of the portfolio. To the extent they exist, unadjusted quoted market prices in active
markets (level 1) or quoted prices on similar assets (level 2) are utilized to determine the fair
value of each investment in the portfolio. In the absence of quoted prices and in an illiquid
market, valuation techniques, which require inputs that are both significant to the fair value
measurement and unobservable (level 3), are used to determine fair value of the investment.
Valuation techniques are based on various assumptions, including, but not limited to cash flows,
discount rates, rate of return, adjustments for nonperformance and liquidity, and liquidation
values. If such decline is deemed other-than-temporary, we would adjust the cost basis of the
security by writing down the security to fair market value through a charge to current period
operations.
Mortgage Servicing Rights, net
Mortgage Servicing Rights are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. The estimated
fair value of MSR is obtained through independent third party valuations through an analysis of
future cash flows, incorporating estimates of assumptions market participants would use in
determining fair value including market discount rates, prepayment speeds, servicing income,
servicing costs, default rates and other market driven data, including the markets perception of
future interest rate movements and, as such, are classified as Level 3.
Loans Receivable
Loans which meet certain criteria are evaluated individually for impairment. A loan is deemed to be
impaired if it is a commercial real estate, multi-family or construction loan with an
13
outstanding
balance greater than $3.0 million and on non-accrual status. Our impaired loans are generally
collateral dependent and, as such, are carried at the estimated fair value of the collateral less
estimated selling costs. Fair value is estimated through current appraisals, and adjusted as
necessary, by management, to reflect current market conditions and, as such, are generally
classified as Level 3.
The following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine the carrying
value of our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
20,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
MSR, net |
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
961 |
|
Impaired loans |
|
|
25,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,800 |
|
|
|
26,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FSP FAS 157-4, Determining
Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional
guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, when the volume and level of activity for the asset or
liability have significantly decreased and includes guidance on identifying circumstances that
indicate a transaction is not orderly. Under FSP FAS 157-4, if the reporting entity concludes
there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or
liability, transactions or quoted prices may not be determinative of fair value. Further analysis
is required and significant adjustments to the transactions or quoted prices may be necessary. FSP
FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 may have on its financial
condition, results of operations and financial statement disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 changes the amount of an
other-than-temporary impairment that is recognized in earnings when there are non-credit losses on
a debt security which management does not intend to sell and for which it is more-likely-than-not
that the entity will not be required to sell the security prior to the recovery of the non-credit
impairment. In those situations, the portion of the total impairment that is attributable to the
credit loss would be recognized in earnings, and the remaining difference between the debt
securitys amortized cost basis and its fair value would be included in other comprehensive income.
FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 also requires additional disclosures about investments in an
unrealized loss position and the methodology and significant inputs used in determining the
recognition of other-than-temporary impairment. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 are effective for
interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this accounting
pronouncement could result in a significant reclass to the components within stocholders equity.
In addition, this pronouncement will eliminate accretion income recognition
14
pertaining to securities previously written down through an OTTI charge. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 will have on its financial
condition, results of operations and financial statement disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, requiring disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim
reporting periods of publicly traded company as well as in annual financial statements. The
disclosure requirements are effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009.
In June 2008, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 08-3, Accounting by
Lessees for Nonrefundable Maintenance Deposits. EITF Issue No. 08-3 requires that all
nonrefundable maintenance deposits be accounted for as a deposit with the deposit expensed or
capitalized in accordance with the lessees maintenance accounting policy when the underlying
maintenance is performed. Once it is determined that an amount on deposit is not probable of being
used to fund future maintenance expense, it is to be recognized as additional expense at the time
such determination is made. EITF Issue No. 08-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after July
1, 2009. The adoption of EITF Issue No. 08-3 is not expected to have a material impact on its
financial condition, results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
In February 2008, FSP No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, was issued. FSP No.
157-2 delayed the application of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities until July 1, 2009. The Company does not expect that the adoption of FSP No. 157-2
will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No.141R, Business Combinations. SFAS 141R requires most
identifiable assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and goodwill acquired in a business
combination to be recorded at full fair value. SFAS No. 141R applies to all business
combinations, including combinations among mutual entities and combinations by contract alone.
Under SFAS No. 141R, all business combinations will be accounted for by applying the acquisition
method. SFAS No. 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition
date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008 and may not be applied before that date. The Company does not expect that the
adoption of SFAS No. 141R will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements. SFAS No. 160 will require noncontrolling interests (previously referred to as minority
interests) to be treated as a separate component of equity, not as a liability or other item
outside of permanent equity. SFAS No. 160 applies to the accounting for noncontrolling interests
and transactions with noncontrolling interest holders in consolidated financial statements. SFAS
No. 160 is effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No.
160 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. SFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments
and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand
their effects on an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.
15
SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 161 did not have a material impact on
the consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, EITF 03-6-1 was issued which addresses whether instruments granted in share-based
payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be
included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share. The Statement is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company
does not expect that the adoption of EITF 03-6-1 will have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements contained herein are not based on historical facts and are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by reference to
a future period or periods or by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as may, will,
believe, expect, estimate, anticipate, continue, or similar terms or variations on those
terms, or the negative of those terms. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks
and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those related to the economic environment,
particularly in the market areas in which Investors Bancorp, Inc. operates, competitive products
and pricing, fiscal and monetary policies of the U.S. Government, changes in government regulations
or interpretations of regulations affecting financial institutions, changes in prevailing interest
rates, acquisitions and the integration of acquired businesses, credit risk management,
asset-liability management, the financial and securities markets and the availability of and costs
associated with sources of liquidity.
The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company wishes to advise that the factors
listed above could affect the Companys financial performance and could cause the Companys actual
results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with
respect to future periods in any current statements. The Company does not undertake and
specifically declines any obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions, which may be
made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such
statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
Executive Summary
Investors Bancorps fundamental business strategy is to be a well capitalized, full service,
community bank and to provide high quality customer service and competitively priced products and
services to individuals and businesses in the communities we serve.
Our results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is directly impacted by
the market interest rate environment. Net interest income is the difference between the interest
income we earn on our interest-earning assets, primarily mortgage loans and investment securities,
and the interest we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, primarily time deposits,
16
interest-bearing transaction accounts and borrowed funds. Net interest income is affected by the
shape of the market yield curve, the timing of the placement and re-pricing of interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities on our balance sheet, non-performing loans and the
prepayment rate on our mortgage-related assets. The Companys results of operations are also
significantly affected by general economic conditions.
The financial services industry continues to face highly volatile and adverse economic conditions.
The significant contributors to the disruptions include widespread subprime mortgage lending,
illiquidity in the capital and credit markets, rising national and local unemployment, the
continued decline of property values in real estate markets, and recent bank failures. While the
government indicates it will continue to support the financial services industry it is difficult to
determine the full impact of the various government support programs.
The Company previously announced that after careful consideration, it decided not to participate in
the Treasury Departments Capital Purchase Program which is part of the broader Troubled Asset
Relief Program (TARP). In reaching this decision, the Company felt its strong capital position and
conservative lending practices would allow it to continue originating loans to qualified
individuals and businesses in its local market and navigate through this difficult economic
environment. In addition, the Companys mutual holding company parent, Investors Bancorp MHC,
currently owns approximately 60% of the Companys outstanding stock. The Company therefore has the
ability to raise additional capital through a second step stock offering. The Company maintains a
strong tangible capital ratio of 10.48% and is considered well capitalized under regulatory
guidelines. We believe we are well positioned to deal with this economic uncertainty and take
advantage of opportunities to enhance our franchise.
At December 31, 2008, the Company recognized a $152.8 million pre-tax, ($90.6 million after-tax),
non-cash other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) charge related to our portfolio of pooled bank
trust preferred collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). The portfolio is comprised of 31
securities whose book value of $173.6 million was reduced to $20.8 million as a result of this
charge. The impairment was recognized because the market value of these securities continued to
decline during the quarter and we do not believe the market value of these securities will recover
within the foreseeable future. Management is analyzing the new accounting guidance issued by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in April 2009 regarding OTTI impairment which must be
adopted in the June 2009 quarter. The adoption of this accounting pronouncement could result in a
significant reclass to the components within stocholders equity. In addition, this pronouncement
will eliminate accretion income recognition pertaining to securities previously written down
through an OTTI charge.
Although we have suffered some of the negative consequences of the current state of the financial
services industry, we have also been able to take advantage of opportunities within the market. The
Company has benefited from the current interest rate environment. The yield on our interest-earning
assets decreased by 11 basis points compared to the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities
decreasing 85 basis points for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same period
prior year. This was due to our interest-bearing liabilities repricing at a faster pace than
interest-earning assets. This resulted in a $14.3 million increase in our net interest income to
$41.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $26.9 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2008.
The interest rate environment is important to our net interest income as is the composition of our
balance sheet. The recent turmoil in the financial markets has created uncertainty and volatility
17
for many financial institutions. This created an opportunity for us to add more loans and increase
the size of our balance sheet. While we have increased the size of out balance sheet in this
difficult environment we have remained focused on maintaining our loan underwriting standards. We
have never originated or purchased, and our portfolio does not include, any sub-prime loans or
option ARM loans.
Total loans increased to $5.57 billion at March 31, 2009 from $4.66 billion at June 30, 2008, an
increase of 19.5%. The majority of the growth came from residential mortgage loans which grew
14.9% or $595.4 million to $4.61 billion. In order to diversify our loan portfolio we have
continued our expansion into commercial real estate lending. During the nine months ended March 31,
2009 commercial real estate, construction and multi-family loans increased $326.1 million or 67.2%.
We believe this may provide us with an opportunity to increase net interest income and improve our
interest rate risk position.
During the nine months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded a $21.0 million provision for loan losses.
This reflected the growth in our loan portfolio; internal downgrades of certain loans in the
commercial real estate portfolio resulting in specific reserves; an increase in specific reserves
on a previously disclosed impaired loan; the increased inherent credit risk in our overall
portfolio, particularly the credit risk associated with commercial real estate lending; an increase
in loan delinquency and non-performing loans; and the continued adverse economic conditions in our
lending area. Net charge-offs were immaterial at $25,000 for the nine month period.
While our nonperforming loans have increased, we believe they remain at a manageable level. At
March 31, 2009, nonperforming loans were $80.1 million, or 1.44% of total loans, compared to $19.4
million, or 0.42% of total loans at June 30, 2008. Additionally, we are mindful of potential
problem loans as these loans may eventually be placed on non-accrual status. At March 31, 2009,
there are 7 loans totaling $19.2 million that the Company has deemed as potential problems.
Management is actively monitoring these loans.
Total deposits increased by $799.9 million to $4.77 billion at March 31, 2009. Core deposits
increased as we were successful in attracting new municipal deposit accounts, opened our newest
branch during the quarter and added business from existing customer relationships, most notably the
branches acquired in the Summit Federal merger in June 2008.
As a result of strong loan growth that exceeded the available cash flows from the investment, loan
and deposit portfolios, borrowed funds increased $192.0 million, or 12.3%, to $1.76 billion at
March 31, 2009 from $1.56 billion at June 30, 2008.
Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008
Total Assets. Total assets increased by $947.7 million, or 14.8%, to $7.37 billion at March 31,
2009 from $6.42 billion at June 30, 2008. This increase was largely the result of the growth in
our loan portfolio partially offset by the decrease in our securities portfolio.
Net Loans. Net loans, including loans held for sale, increased by $917.9 million, or 19.6%, to
$5.60 billion at March 31, 2009 from $4.68 billion at June 30, 2008. As many financial
institutions have curtailed their lending operations, we have taken advantage of this opportunity
to increase our loan portfolio without compromising our underwriting standards. The loans we
originate and purchase are on properties in New Jersey and states in close proximity to New
18
Jersey. We do not originate or purchase and our loan portfolio does not include any sub-prime loans
or option ARMs.
We originate residential mortgage loans directly and through our mortgage subsidiary, ISB Mortgage
Co. During the nine months ended March 31, 2009 we originated $300.4 million in residential
mortgage loans. In addition, we purchase mortgage loans from correspondent entities including other
banks and mortgage bankers. Our agreements with these correspondent entities require them to
originate loans that adhere to our underwriting standards. During the nine months ended March 31,
2009, we purchased loans totaling $670.0 million from these entities. We also purchase pools of
mortgage loans in the secondary market on a bulk purchase basis from several well-established
financial institutions. During the nine months ended March 31, 2009, we took advantage of several
opportunities to purchase $303.8 million of residential mortgage loans that met our underwriting
criteria on a bulk purchase basis.
For the nine months ended March 31, 2009, we originated $58.5 million in multi-family loans, $117.8
million in commercial real estate loans and $111.6 million in construction loans. We also
purchased $100.9 million of multi-family loans in the secondary market on a bulk purchase basis.
This activity is consistent with our strategy to diversify our loan portfolio by adding more
multi-family, commercial real estate and construction loans.
The Company also originates interest-only one-to four-family mortgage loans in which the borrower
makes only interest payments for the first five, seven or ten years of the mortgage loan term.
This feature will result in future increases in the borrowers loan repayment when the
contractually required repayments increase due to the required amortization of the principal
amount. These payment increases could affect the borrowers ability to repay the loan. The amount
of interest-only one-to four-family mortgage loans at March 31, 2009 was $511.8 million compared to
$450.0 million at June 30, 2008. The ability of borrowers to repay their obligations are dependent
upon various factors including the borrowers income and net worth, cash flows generated by the
underlying collateral, value of the underlying collateral and priority of the Companys lien on the
property. Such factors are dependent upon various economic conditions and individual circumstances
beyond the Companys control. The Company is, therefore, subject to risk of loss. The Company
maintains stricter underwriting criteria for these interest-only loans than it does for its
amortizing loans. The Company believes these criteria adequately lessen the potential exposure to
such risks and that adequate provisions for loan losses are provided for all known and inherent
risks.
The allowance for loan losses increased by $21.0 million to $34.5 million at March 31, 2009 from
$13.6 million at June 30, 2008. The increase in our allowance reflects the continued growth in the
loan portfolio; internal downgrades of certain loans in the commercial real estate portfolio
resulting in specific reserves; an increase in specific reserves on a previously disclosed impaired
loan; the increased inherent credit risk in our overall portfolio, particularly the credit risk
associated with commercial real estate lending; an increase in loan delinquency and non-performing
loans; and the adverse economic conditions in our lending area. The comparative table below
details non-performing loans and allowance for loan loss coverage ratios over the last four
quarters.
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
# of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential and consumer |
|
|
66 |
|
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
$ |
10.4 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
Multi-family |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Construction |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Performing Loans |
|
|
81 |
|
|
$ |
80.1 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
$ |
47.8 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
$ |
42.1 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
$ |
19.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total
loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.42 |
% |
Allowance for loan loss as a
percent of non-performing
loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.03 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses as a
percent of total loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.29 |
% |
A non-performing multifamily loan for $19.4 million has a current loan to value of approximately
55% and management believes that the probability of loss on this loan is low.
In addition to non-performing loans we continue to monitor our portfolio for potential problem
loans. Potential problem loans are defined as loans about which we have concerns as to the ability
of the borrower to comply with the present loan repayment terms and which may cause the loan to be
placed on non-accrual status. As of March 31, 2009, the Company
has six construction loans
totaling $17.1 million that it deemed potential problem loans. Three of the loans are current, one
loan is 30 days delinquent and three loans are 60 days delinquent. Management is actively
monitoring these loans.
Future increases in the allowance for loan losses may be necessary based on the growth of the loan
portfolio, the change in composition of the loan portfolio, possible future increases in
non-performing loans and charge-offs, and the impact the deterioration of the real estate and
economic environments in our lending area. Although we use the best information available, the
level of allowance for loan losses remains an estimate that is subject to significant judgment and
short-term change. See Critical Accounting Policies.
Securities. Securities, in the aggregate, decreased by $361.2 million, or 24.8%, to $1.10 billion
at March 31, 2009, from $1.46 billion at June 30, 2008. The decrease is the result of the run-off
of the securities portfolio in addition to the writedown of the book value of pooled bank trust
preferred CDOs through a $156.7 million pre-tax non-cash OTTI charge during the prior quarter.
During the current quarter the Company recognized $1.3 million in accretion income related to our
expected cashflows relating to these securities. The cash flows from our securities portfolio are
being used to help fund our loan growth. This is consistent with our strategic plan to change our
mix of assets by reducing the size of our securities portfolio and increasing the size of our loan
portfolio.
The securities portfolio also includes private label mortgage backed securities with an amortized
cost of $178.3 million and a fair value of $166.0 million. Of these securities, $169.2 million in
amortized cost, $158.7 million in fair value, are AAA rated and were originated in the period
2002-2004 and are performing in accordance with contractual terms. The decrease in fair value for
these securities is attributed to changes in market interest rates. One security with an
20
amortized cost of $8.0 million, $6.3 million fair value, was downgraded to BBB in April 2009.
Management will continue to monitor these securities for possible OTTI.
Net Deferred Tax Asset. Net deferred tax asset increased by $67.5 million from $40.7 million at
June 30, 2008 to $108.2 million at March 31, 2009 which is primarily attributed to the tax benefit
recorded as a result of the OTTI charge on our pooled bank trust preferred CDOs.
Stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank, Bank Owned Life Insurance and Other Assets. The amount of
stock we own in the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) increased by $8.6 million from $60.9 million at
June 30, 2008 to $69.6 million at March 31, 2009 as a result of an increase in our level of
borrowings at March 31, 2009. There was also an increase in accrued interest receivable of $4.8
million resulting from an increase in the average balance of our interest-earning assets.
Additionally, bank owned life insurance increased by $2.2 million from $96.2 million at June 30,
2008 to $98.4 million at March 31, 2009.
Deposits. Deposits increased by $799.9 million, or 20.1%, to $4.77 billion at March 31, 2009 from
$3.97 billion at June 30, 2008. Checking account deposits, savings account deposits, money market
account deposits and certificates of deposits increased by $485.2 million, $194.6 million, $86.3
million and $33.8 million, respectively. Deposits increased as we were successful in attracting new
municipal deposit accounts, opened our newest branch during the quarter and added business from
existing customer relationships, most notably the branches acquired in the Summit Federal merger in
June 2008.
Borrowed Funds. Borrowed funds increased $192.0 million, or 12.3%, to $1.76 billion at March 31,
2009 from $1.56 billion at June 30, 2008. We utilized wholesale borrowings to fund a portion of our
loan growth because of the lower rates available in the wholesale markets.
Stockholders Equity. Stockholders equity decreased $61.7 million to $766.9 million at March 31,
2009 from $828.5 million at June 30, 2008 primarily due to net loss of $70.4 million for the nine
months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in additional paid-in
capital for compensation costs associated with stock options and restricted stock.
Average Balance Sheets for the Three Months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
The following table presents certain information regarding Investors Bancorp, Inc.s financial
condition and net interest income for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. The
table presents the annualized average yield on interest-earning assets and the annualized average
cost of interest-bearing liabilities. We derived the yields and costs by dividing annualized income
or expense by the average balance of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities,
respectively, for the periods shown. We derived average balances from daily balances over the
periods indicated. Interest income includes fees that we consider adjustments to yields.
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Earned/Paid |
|
|
Yield/Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Earned/Paid |
|
|
Yield/Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
205,083 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
$ |
41,718 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
% |
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,626 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
|
2.74 |
% |
Securities available-for-sale(1) |
|
|
179,298 |
|
|
|
2,083 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
227,877 |
|
|
|
2,625 |
|
|
|
4.61 |
% |
Securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
960,946 |
|
|
|
13,154 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
% |
|
|
1,405,903 |
|
|
|
16,535 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
% |
Net loans |
|
|
5,631,836 |
|
|
|
76,723 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
% |
|
|
4,053,804 |
|
|
|
57,605 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
% |
Stock in FHLB |
|
|
73,062 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
|
44,270 |
|
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
8.81 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
7,050,225 |
|
|
|
92,749 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
% |
|
|
5,797,198 |
|
|
|
78,160 |
|
|
|
5.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest earning assets |
|
|
258,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
7,308,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,982,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings |
|
$ |
555,319 |
|
|
$ |
3,242 |
|
|
|
2.34 |
% |
|
$ |
389,507 |
|
|
$ |
2,075 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
% |
Interest-bearing checking |
|
|
711,075 |
|
|
|
4,082 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
% |
|
|
345,902 |
|
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
1.86 |
% |
Money market accounts |
|
|
294,927 |
|
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
208,798 |
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
2.35 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
3,025,100 |
|
|
|
25,018 |
|
|
|
3.31 |
% |
|
|
2,923,675 |
|
|
|
33,487 |
|
|
|
4.58 |
% |
Borrowed funds |
|
|
1,836,931 |
|
|
|
17,691 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
1,190,571 |
|
|
|
12,887 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
6,423,352 |
|
|
|
51,591 |
|
|
|
3.21 |
% |
|
|
5,058,453 |
|
|
|
51,282 |
|
|
|
4.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
134,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,557,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,156,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
751,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
826,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
$ |
7,308,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,982,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest earning assets(3) |
|
$ |
626,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
738,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of interest-earning assets to
total interest-
bearing liabilities |
|
|
1.10 |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.15 |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Earned/Paid |
|
|
Yield/Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Earned/Paid |
|
|
Yield/Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
81,979 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
$ |
31,414 |
|
|
$ |
814 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
% |
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,732 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
2.79 |
% |
Securities available-for-sale (1) |
|
|
191,002 |
|
|
|
6,574 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
% |
|
|
242,244 |
|
|
|
8,354 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
% |
Securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
1,122,518 |
|
|
|
40,376 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
1,483,264 |
|
|
|
53,384 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
% |
Net loans |
|
|
5,371,836 |
|
|
|
225,494 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
% |
|
|
3,927,416 |
|
|
|
168,262 |
|
|
|
5.71 |
% |
Stock in FHLB |
|
|
77,326 |
|
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
43,327 |
|
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
|
7.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
6,844,661 |
|
|
|
274,696 |
|
|
|
5.35 |
% |
|
|
5,735,397 |
|
|
|
233,351 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-earning assets |
|
|
213,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
7,058,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,920,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings |
|
$ |
448,667 |
|
|
$ |
6,892 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
$ |
361,733 |
|
|
$ |
5,662 |
|
|
|
2.09 |
% |
Interest-bearing checking |
|
|
485,867 |
|
|
|
6,924 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
353,957 |
|
|
|
5,959 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
% |
Money market accounts |
|
|
275,134 |
|
|
|
4,582 |
|
|
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
201,230 |
|
|
|
3,889 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
2,987,340 |
|
|
|
78,439 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
2,896,570 |
|
|
|
102,696 |
|
|
|
4.73 |
% |
Borrowed funds |
|
|
1,938,909 |
|
|
|
55,053 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
% |
|
|
1,170,464 |
|
|
|
41,414 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
6,135,917 |
|
|
|
151,890 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
% |
|
|
4,983,954 |
|
|
|
159,620 |
|
|
|
4.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
120,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,256,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,086,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
801,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
834,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
7,058,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,920,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
122,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets (3) |
|
$ |
708,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
751,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of interest-earning assets to total
interest-
bearing liabilities |
|
|
1.12 |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.15 |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Securities available-for-sale are stated at amortized cost, adjusted for unamortized
purchased premiums and discounts. |
|
(2) |
|
Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average
interest-earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning
assets. |
23
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
Net Income. The Company had net income of $7.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009
compared to net income of $4.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Net Interest Income. Our net interest margin for the three months and nine months ended March 31,
2009 was positively impacted by the steeper yield curve which allowed us to reduce deposit rates
and borrow money at lower rates while keeping mortgage rates relatively stable.
Net interest income increased by $14.3 million, or 53.1%, to $41.2 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 from $26.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The increase
was caused by an 85 basis point decrease in our cost of interest-bearing liabilities to 3.21% for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 4.06% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
growth in average interest earning assets. This was partially offset by a 13 basis point decrease
in our yield on interest-earning assets to 5.26% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from
5.39% for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Our net interest margin improved by 49 basis
points from 1.85% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to 2.34% for the three months ended
March 31, 2009.
Interest and Dividend Income. Total interest and dividend income increased by $14.6 million, or
18.7%, to $92.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $78.2 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008. This increase is attributed to the average balance of interest-earning
assets increasing $1.25 billion, or 21.6%, to $7.05 billion for the three months ended March 31,
2009 from $5.80 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2008. This was partially offset by a
13 basis point decrease in the weighted average yield on interest-earning
assets to 5.26% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to 5.39% for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 as a result of the lower interest rate environment and the impact of
non-performing loans.
Interest income on loans increased by $19.1 million, or 33.2%, to $76.7 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 from $57.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008,
reflecting a $1.58 billion, or 38.9%, increase in the average balance of net loans to $5.63 billion
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $4.05 billion for the three months ended March 31,
2008. The average yield on loans decreased 23 basis points to 5.45% for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 from 5.68% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 reflecting the current low
interest rate environment and the impact of non-performing loans.
Interest income on all other interest-earning assets, excluding loans, decreased by $4.5 million,
or 22.0%, to $16.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $20.6 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008. This decrease reflected a $325.0 million decrease in the average
balance of all other interest-earning assets, excluding loans, and a 20 basis point decrease in the
average
yield on all other interest-earning assets, excluding loans, to 4.52% for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 from 4.72% for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The decrease in yield
resulted from maintaining higher cash balances this quarter at lower yields and receiving less
dividend income on stock in FHLB partially offset by $1.3 million in accretion related to our
expected cashflows on the previously written down trust preferred CDOs.
Interest Expense. Total interest expense increased by $309,000, or 0.6%, to $51.6 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 from $51.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
This increase was due to the average balance of total interest-bearing liabilities
24
increasing by
$1.36 billion, or 27.0%, to $6.42 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $5.06
billion for the three months ended March 31, 2008. This was significantly offset by the weighted
average cost of total interest-bearing liabilities decreasing 85 basis points to 3.21% for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to 4.06% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as
the lower interest rate environment resulted in our certificate of deposit accounts repricing
downward to current market rates.
Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits decreased $4.5 million, or 11.7% to $33.9 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $38.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
This decrease was due to a 101 basis point decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing
deposits to 2.96% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 3.97% for the three months ended
March 31, 2008. This was partially offset by the average balance of interest-bearing deposits
increasing $718.5 million, or 18.6% to $4.59 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from
$3.87 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Interest expense on borrowed funds increased by $4.8 million, or 37.3%, to $17.7 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 from $12.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
This increase is due to the average balance of borrowed funds increasing by $646.4 million or
54.3%, to $1.84 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $1.19 billion for the three
months ended March 31, 2008. This was partially offset by the average cost of borrowed funds
decreasing 48 basis points to 3.85% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 4.33% for the
three months ended March 31, 2008.
Provision for Loan Losses. Our provision for loan losses was $8.0 million for the three month
period ended March 31, 2009 compared to $1.0 million for the three month period ended March 31,
2008. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, net charge-offs totaled $8,000 compared
to net charge-offs of $22,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The increase in our
provision is due to internal downgrades of certain loans in the commercial real estate portfolio
resulting in specific reserves; an increase in specific reserves on a previously disclosed impaired
loan; the increased inherent credit risk in our overall portfolio, particularly the credit risk
associated with commercial real estate lending; an increase in loan delinquency and non-performing
loans; and the adverse economic conditions in our lending area. See discussion of the allowance for
loan losses and non-accrual loans in Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2009 and June
30, 2008.
Non-interest Income. Total non-interest income increased by $1.3 million to $3.4 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 from $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The
increase was primarily the result of a $1.9 million increase in the gain on sale of residential
mortgage loans as mortgage banking activity increased and we sold more loans to third parties
including FNMA. This increase was offset by a decrease in bank owned life insurance income of
$700,000.
Non-interest Expenses. Total non-interest expenses increased by $3.8 million, or 18.5%, to $24.5
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $20.6 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008. The net increase is primarily attributed to a $1.7 million increase in our FDIC
premiums and a $1.7 million increase in compensation and fringe benefits as a result of the
accelerated vesting of two participants in the equity incentive plan; staff additions in our
commercial real estate, retail banking areas and our mortgage company; additional equity incentive
plan expense for grants made during 2008. Additionally, we incurred expenses associated with
opening two new branches.
25
Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $5.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009
representing an effective tax expense rate of 41.6% for the period. There was an income tax expense
of $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 representing an effective tax expense
rate of 38.6% for the period.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
Net Income. The Company had a net loss for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of $70.4 million
compared to net income of $10.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. The net loss for
the nine months ended March 31, 2009 was due to the Company recognizing a $156.7 million pre-tax,
non-cash OTTI charge at December 31, 2008 related to our portfolio of CDOs.
Net Interest Income. Our net interest margin for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 was
positively impacted by the steeper yield curve which allowed us to reduce deposit rates and borrow
money at lower rates while keeping mortgage rates relatively stable.
Net interest income increased by $49.1 million, or 66.6%, to $122.8 million for the nine months
ended March 31, 2009 from $73.7 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. The increase was
caused primarily by a 97 basis point decrease in our cost of interest-bearing liabilities to 3.30%
for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from 4.27% for the nine months ended March 31, 2008 and
growth in average interest earning assets. This was partially offset by a 7 basis point decrease in
our yield on interest-earning assets to 5.35% for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from 5.42%
for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. Our net interest
margin improved by 68 basis points from 1.71% for the nine months ended March 31, 2008 to 2.39% for
the nine months ended March 31, 2009.
Interest and Dividend Income. Total interest and dividend income increased by $41.3 million, or
17.7%, to $274.7 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $233.4 million for the nine
months ended March 31, 2008. This increase is due to the average balance of interest-earning assets
increasing $1.11 billion, or 19.3%, to $6.84 billion for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from
$5.74 billion for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. This was partially offset by a 7 basis
point decrease in the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets to 5.35% for the nine
months ended March 31, 2009 compared to 5.42% for the nine months ended March 31, 2008.
Interest income on loans increased by $57.2 million, or 34.0%, to $225.5 million for the nine
months ended March 31, 2009 from $168.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008,
reflecting a $1.44 billion, or 36.8%, increase in the average balance of net loans to $5.37 billion
for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $3.93 billion for the nine months ended March 31,
2008. The average yield on loans decreased 11 basis points to 5.60% for the nine months ended
March 31, 2009 from 5.71% for the nine months ended March 31, 2008 reflecting the current low
interest rate environment and the impact of non-performing loans.
Interest income on all other interest-earning assets, excluding loans, decreased by $15.9 million,
or 24.4%, to $49.2 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $65.1 million for the nine
months ended March 31, 2008. This decrease reflected a $334.9 million decrease in the average
balance of all other interest-earning assets and a 35 basis point decrease in the average
26
yield on
all other interest-earning assets, excluding loans, to 4.45% for the nine months ended March 31,
2009 from 4.80% for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. The decrease in yield resulted from
maintaining higher balances of cash this quarter at lower yields and receiving less dividend income
from the FHLB partially offset by $1.3 million in accretion related to our expected cashflows on
the previously written down trust preferred CDOs.
Interest Expense. Total interest expense decreased by $7.7 million, or 4.8%, to $151.9 million for
the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $159.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008.
This decrease was due to the weighted average cost of total interest-bearing liabilities decreasing
97 basis points to 3.30% for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 compared to 4.27% for the nine
months ended March 31, 2008 as the lower interest rate environment resulted in our certificate of
deposit accounts repricing downward to current market rates. This was partially offset by the
average balance of total interest-bearing liabilities increasing by $1.15 billion, or 23.1%, to
$6.14 billion for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $4.98 billion for the nine months ended
March 31, 2008.
Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits decreased $21.4 million, or 18.1% to $96.8 million
for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $118.2 million for the nine months ended March 31,
2008. This decrease was due to a 105 basis point decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing
deposits to 3.08% for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from 4.13% for the nine months ended
March 31, 2008. This was partially offset by the average balance of interest-bearing deposits
increasing $383.5 million, or 10.1% to $4.20 billion for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from
$3.81 billion for the nine months ended March 31, 2008.
Interest expense on borrowed funds increased by $13.6 million, or 32.9%, to $55.1 million for the
nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $41.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. This
increase is attributed to the average balance of borrowed funds increasing by $768.4
million or 65.7%, to $1.94 billion for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $1.17 billion for
the nine months ended March 31, 2008. This was partially offset by the average cost of borrowed
funds decreasing 93 basis points to 3.79% for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from 4.72% for
the nine months ended March 31, 2008.
Provision for Loan Losses. Our provision for loan losses was $21.0 million for the nine month
period ended March 31, 2009 compared to $2.9 million for the nine month period ended March 31,
2008. For the nine months ended March 31, 2009, net charge-offs totaled $25,000 compared to net
charge-offs of $31,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. The increase in our provision is
due to continued growth in the loan portfolio; internal downgrades of certain loans in the
commercial real estate portfolio resulting in specific reserves; an increase in specific reserves
on a previously disclosed impaired loan; the increased inherent credit risk in our overall
portfolio, particularly the credit risk associated with commercial real estate lending; an increase
in loan delinquency and non-performing loans; and the adverse economic conditions in our lending
area. See discussion of the allowance for loan losses and non-accrual loans in Comparison of
Financial Condition at March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008.
Non-interest Income. Total non-interest income decreased by $156.8 million to a loss of $150.8
million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from income of $6.0 million for the nine months
ended March 31, 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of a $156.7 million pre-tax non-cash
OTTI charge recognized on our pooled bank trust preferred CDOs for the nine months ended March 31,
2009.
27
Non-interest Expenses. Total non-interest expenses increased by $9.5 million, or 15.9%, to $69.6
million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 from $60.1 million for the nine months ended March
31, 2008. Included in the prior year was a $2.3 million gain recognized from the curtailment and
settlement of our postretirement benefit obligation. Excluding this item, the net increase of $7.2
million is attributed to a $2.8 million increase on our FDIC premiums; compensation and fringe
benefits increasing by $2.8 million as a result of the accelerated vesting of two participants in
the equity incentive plan; staff additions in our commercial real estate, retail banking areas and
our mortgage company; additional equity incentive plan expense for grants made during 2008. The
other increases are associated with opening two new branches and additional advertising expense to
promote our deposit and loan growth initiatives.
Income Taxes. Income tax benefit was $48.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009
representing a 40.7% effective tax benefit rate for the period. The benefit is primarily the result
of the OTTI charge taken on our pooled trust preferred securities. For the nine months ended March
31, 2008 there was an income tax expense of $6.1 million representing an effective tax expense rate
of 36.6% for the period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and
mortgage-backed securities, proceeds from the sale of loans, Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and
other borrowings and, to a lesser extent, investment maturities. While scheduled amortization of
loans is a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly
influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. The Company has other
sources of liquidity if a need for additional funds arises, including an overnight line of credit
and other borrowings from the FHLB and other correspondent banks.
At March 31, 2009 the Company did not have any overnight borrowings outstanding compared to $88.0
million of outstanding overnight borrowings at June 30, 2008. The Company utilizes the overnight
line from time to time to fund short-term liquidity needs. The Company had total borrowings of
$1.76 billion at March 31, 2009, an increase from $1.56 billion at June 30, 2008. This increase was
primarily the of result strong loan growth that exceeded the available cash flows from the
investment and deposit portfolios.
In the normal course of business, the Company routinely enters into various commitments, primarily
relating to the origination of loans. At March 31, 2009, outstanding commitments to originate loans
totaled $256.0 million; outstanding unused lines of credit totaled $315.2 million; standby letters
of credit totaled $3.1 million and outstanding commitments to sell loans totaled $67.7 million. The
Company expects to have sufficient funds available to meet current commitments in the normal course
of business.
Time deposits scheduled to mature in one year or less totaled $2.41 billion at March 31, 2009.
Based upon historical experience management estimates that a significant portion of such deposits
will remain with the Company.
The Board of Directors approved a third share repurchase program at their January 2008 meeting,
which authorized the repurchase of an additional 10% of the Companys its publiclyheld outstanding
common stock, or 4,307,248 shares of Investors Bancorp, Inc. common stock in the open market and
through other privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities
laws. During the three month period ended March 31, 2009, the
28
Company did not repurchase any shares
of its common stock. Under the current share repurchase program, 3,514,617 shares remain available
for repurchase. As of March 31, 2009, a total of 10,896,052 shares have been purchased under Board
authorized share repurchase programs, of which 1,928,701 shares were allocated to fund the
restricted stock portion of the Companys 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. The remaining shares are held
for general corporate use.
As of March 31, 2009 Investors Savings Bank and Investors Bancorp, Inc. exceeded all regulatory
capital requirements as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Actual |
|
Required |
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
$ |
694,763 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
$ |
320,857 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
660,222 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
160,429 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Tier I capital (to average assets)
|
|
|
660,222 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
292,060 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
As of March 31, 2009, Investors Bancorp, Inc. had total capital to risk-weighted assets of 20.1%,
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets of 19.2% and Tier I to average assets of 10.6%.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
In the normal course of operations, the Company engages in a variety of financial transactions
that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in the
financial statements. These transactions primarily relate to lending commitments.
The following table shows the contractual obligations of the Company by expected payment period as
of March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
One-Two |
|
Two-Three |
|
More than |
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
One Year |
|
Years |
|
Years |
|
Three Years |
Debt obligations (excluding capitalized leases) |
|
$ |
1,755,562 |
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
|
|
330,000 |
|
|
|
610,000 |
|
|
|
535,562 |
|
Commitments to originate and purchase loans |
|
$ |
256,046 |
|
|
|
256,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to sell loans |
|
$ |
67,737 |
|
|
|
67,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, at March 31, 2009, the Companys commitments to fund unused lines of credit totaled
$315.2 million.
Debt obligations include borrowings from the FHLB and other borrowings. The borrowings have defined
terms and, under certain circumstances, $790.0 million of the borrowings are callable at the option
of the lender.
Commitments to originate loans and commitments to fund unused lines of credit are agreements to
lend additional funds to customers as long as there have been no violations of any of the
conditions established in the agreements. Commitments generally have a fixed expiration or other
termination clauses which may or may not require a payment of a fee. Since some of these loan
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, total commitments do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements.
29
In addition to the contractual obligations previously discussed, we have other liabilities and
capitalized and operating lease obligations. These contractual obligations as of March 31, 2009
have not changed significantly from June 30, 2008.
On April 14, 2009 the Company announced it received all of the necessary regulatory approvals to
proceed with the acquisition of American Bancorp of New Jersey, Inc. The American Bancorp annual
meeting of shareholders, at which their shareholders will vote on the acquisition, is scheduled to
be held on May 19, 2009. If shareholder approval is received the merger is scheduled to close on or
about May 29, 2009.
For further information regarding our off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations,
see Part II, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Policies
We consider accounting policies that require management to exercise significant judgment or
discretion or to make significant assumptions that have, or could have, a material impact on the
carrying value of certain assets or on income, to be critical accounting policies. We consider
the following to be our critical accounting policies.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is the estimated amount considered
necessary to cover credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The
allowance is established through the provision for loan losses that is charged against income. In
determining the allowance for loan losses, we make significant estimates and, therefore, have
identified the allowance as a critical accounting policy. The methodology for determining the
allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting policy by management because of the
high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the assumptions used, and the potential for
changes in the economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded
allowance for loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses has been determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, under which we are required to maintain an allowance for probable losses at
the balance sheet date. We are responsible for the timely and periodic determination of the amount
of the allowance required. We believe that our allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover
specifically identifiable losses, as well as estimated losses inherent in our portfolio for which
certain losses are probable but not specifically identifiable.
Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. The
analysis of the allowance for loan losses has two components: specific and general allocations.
Specific allocations are made for loans determined to be impaired. A loan is deemed to be impaired
if it is a commercial real estate, multi-family or construction loan with an outstanding balance
greater than $3.0 million and on non-accrual status. Impairment is measured by determining the
present value of expected future cash flows or, for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of
the collateral adjusted for market conditions and selling expenses. The general allocation is
determined by segregating the remaining loans, including those loans not meeting the Companys
definition of an impaired loan, by type of loan, risk weighting (if applicable) and payment
history. We also analyze historical loss experience, delinquency trends, general economic
conditions, geographic concentrations, and industry and peer comparisons. This analysis
establishes factors that are applied to the loan groups to determine the amount of the
30
general
allocations. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may
be susceptible to significant revisions based upon changes in economic and real estate market
conditions. Actual loan losses may be significantly more than the allowance for loan losses we
have established which could have a material negative effect on our financial results.
On a quarterly basis, managements Allowance for Loan Loss Committee reviews the current status of
various loan assets in order to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. In this
evaluation process, specific loans are analyzed to determine their potential risk of loss. This
process includes all loans, concentrating on non-accrual and classified loans. Each non-accrual or
classified loan is evaluated for potential loss exposure. Any shortfall results in a
recommendation of a specific allowance if the likelihood of loss is evaluated as probable. To
determine the adequacy of collateral on a particular loan, an estimate of the fair market value of
the collateral is based on the most current appraised value available. This appraised value is
then reduced to reflect estimated liquidation expenses.
The results of this quarterly process are summarized along with recommendations and presented to
Executive and Senior Management for their review. Based on these recommendations, loan loss
allowances are approved by Executive and Senior Management. All supporting documentation with
regard to the evaluation process, loan loss experience, allowance levels and the schedules of
classified loans are maintained by the Lending Administration Department. A summary of loan loss
allowances is presented to the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.
Our primary lending emphasis has been the origination and purchase of residential mortgage loans
and, to a lesser extent, commercial real estate mortgages. We also originate home equity
loans and home equity lines of credit. These activities resulted in a loan concentration in
residential mortgages. We also have a concentration of loans secured by real property located in
New Jersey. As a substantial amount of our loan portfolio is collateralized by real estate,
appraisals of the underlying value of property securing loans are critical in determining the
amount of the allowance required for specific loans. Assumptions for appraisal valuations are
instrumental in determining the value of properties. Overly optimistic assumptions or negative
changes to assumptions could significantly impact the valuation of a property securing a loan and
the related allowance determined. The assumptions supporting such appraisals are carefully
reviewed by management to determine that the resulting values reasonably reflect amounts realizable
on the related loans. Based on the composition of our loan portfolio, we believe the primary risks
are increases in interest rates, a decline in the general economy, and a decline in real estate
market values in New Jersey. Any one or combination of these events may adversely affect our loan
portfolio resulting in increased delinquencies, loan losses and future levels of loan loss
provisions. We consider it important to maintain the ratio of our allowance for loan losses to
total loans at an adequate level given current economic conditions, interest rates, and the
composition of the portfolio.
Our allowance for loan losses reflects probable losses considering, among other things, the actual
growth and change in composition of our loan portfolio, the level of our non-performing loans and
our charge-off experience. We believe the allowance for loan losses reflects the inherent credit
risk in our portfolio.
Although we believe we have established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at adequate
levels, additions may be necessary if the current operating environment continues or deteriorates.
Management uses the best information available; however, the level of the allowance for loan losses
remains an estimate that is subject to significant judgment and short-
31
term change. In addition,
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance,
as an integral part of their examination process, will periodically review our allowance for loan
losses. Such agencies may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their
judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.
Deferred Income Taxes. The Company records income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, as amended, using the asset
and liability method. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities: (i) are recognized for the
expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or
tax returns; (ii) are attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts
of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases; and (iii) are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years when those temporary differences are expected to
be recovered or settled. Where applicable, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance
for any portions determined not likely to be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income tax expense in the period of
enactment. The valuation allowance is adjusted, by a charge or credit to income tax expense, as
changes in facts and circumstances warrant.
Asset Impairment Judgments. Certain of our assets are carried on our consolidated balance sheets
at cost, fair value or at the lower of cost or fair value. Valuation allowances or write-downs are
established when necessary to recognize impairment of such assets. We periodically perform
analyses to test for impairment of such assets. In addition to the impairment analyses related to
our loans discussed above, another significant impairment analysis is the determination
of whether there has been an other-than-temporary decline in the value of one or more of our
securities.
Our available-for-sale portfolio is carried at estimated fair value, with any unrealized gains or
losses, net of taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in stockholders
equity. Our held-to-maturity portfolio, consisting primarily of mortgage backed securities and
other debt securities for which we have a positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, is
carried at amortized cost. We conduct a periodic review and evaluation of the securities portfolio
to determine if the value of any security has declined below its cost or amortized cost, and
whether such decline is other-than-temporary.
Management utilizes various inputs to determine the fair value of the portfolio. To the extent
they exist, unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets (level 1) or quoted prices on similar
assets (level 2) are utilized to determine the fair value of each investment in the portfolio. In
the absence of quoted prices and in an illiquid market, valuation techniques, which require inputs
that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (level 3), are used to
determine fair value of the investment. Valuation techniques are based on various assumptions,
including, but not limited to cash flows, discount rates, rate of return, adjustments for
nonperformance and liquidity, and liquidation values. Management is required to use a significant
degree of judgment when the valuation of investments includes inputs. The use of different
assumptions could have a positive or negative effect on our consolidated financial condition or
results of operations.
The market values of our securities are also affected by changes in interest rates. When
significant changes in interest rates occur, we evaluate our intent and ability to hold the
security to maturity or for a sufficient time to recover our recorded investment balance.
32
If it is determined that the value of any security has declined below its cost or amortized cost,
and such decline is deemed other-than-temporary, we would adjust the cost basis of the security by
writing down the security to fair market value through a charge to current period operations.
During the nine months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded a $156.7 million, pre-tax, non-cash,
other-than-temporary impairment charge on our pooled bank trust preferred securities classified as
held to maturity.
Stock-Based Compensation. We recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for
awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of those awards in accordance with
SFAS No. 123(R).
We estimate the per share fair value of option grants on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model using assumptions for the expected dividend yield, expected stock price
volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected option term. These assumptions are subjective in
nature, involve uncertainties and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. The
Black-Scholes option pricing model also contains certain inherent limitations when applied to
options that are not traded on public markets.
The per share fair value of options is highly sensitive to changes in assumptions. In general, the
per share fair value of options will move in the same direction as changes in the expected stock
price volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected option term, and in the opposite direction
as changes in the expected dividend yield. For example, the per share fair value of options will
generally increase as expected stock price volatility increases, risk-free interest rate increases,
expected option term increases and expected dividend yield decreases. The use of different
assumptions or different option pricing models could result in materially different per share fair
values of options.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Qualitative Analysis. We believe our most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk.
Interest rate risk results from timing differences in the maturity or re-pricing of our assets,
liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts (i.e., loan commitments); the effect of loan
prepayments, deposits and withdrawals; the difference in the behavior of lending and funding rates
arising from the uses of different indices; and yield curve risk arising from changing interest
rate relationships across the spectrum of maturities for constant or variable credit risk
investments. Besides directly affecting our net interest income, changes in market interest rates
can also affect the amount of new loan originations, the ability of borrowers to repay variable
rate loans, the volume of loan prepayments and refinancings, the carrying value of securities
classified as available for sale and the mix and flow of deposits.
The general objective of our interest rate risk management is to determine the appropriate level of
risk given our business model and then manage that risk in a manner consistent with our policy to
reduce, to the extent possible, the exposure of our net interest income to changes in market
interest rates. Our Interest Rate Risk Committee, which consists of senior management, evaluates
the interest rate risk inherent in certain assets and liabilities, our operating environment and
capital and liquidity requirements and modifies our lending, investing and deposit gathering
strategies accordingly. On a quarterly basis, our Board of Directors reviews the Interest Rate
Risk Committee report, the aforementioned activities and strategies, the estimated effect of those
33
strategies on our net interest margin and the estimated effect that changes in market interest
rates may have on the economic value of our loan and securities portfolios, as well as the
intrinsic value of our deposits and borrowings.
We actively evaluate interest rate risk in connection with our lending, investing and deposit
activities. Historically, our lending activities have emphasized one- to four-family fixed- and
variable- rate first mortgages. Our variable-rate mortgage related assets have helped to reduce our
exposure to interest rate fluctuations and is expected to benefit our long-term profitability, as
the rate earned in the mortgage loans will increase as prevailing market rates increase. However,
the current interest rate environment, and the preferences of our customers, has resulted in more
of a demand for fixed-rate products. This may adversely impact our net interest income,
particularly in a rising rate environment. To help manage our interest rate risk, we have increased
our focus on the origination of commercial real estate mortgage loans and adjustable-rate
construction loans. In addition, we primarily invest in shorter-to-medium duration securities,
which generally have shorter average lives and lower yields compared to longer term securities.
Shortening the average lives of our securities, along with originating more adjustable-rate
mortgages and commercial real estate mortgages, will help to reduce interest rate risk.
We retain two independent, nationally recognized consulting firms who specialize in asset and
liability management to complete our quarterly interest rate risk reports. They use a combination
of analyses to monitor our exposure to changes in interest rates. The economic value of equity
analysis is a model that estimates the change in net portfolio value (NPV) over a range of
immediately changed interest rate scenarios. NPV is the discounted present value of expected cash
flows from assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet contracts. In calculating changes in
NPV, assumptions estimating loan prepayment rates, reinvestment rates and deposit decay rates that
seem most likely based on historical experience during prior interest rate changes are used.
The net interest income analysis uses data derived from a dynamic asset and liability analysis,
described below, and applies several additional elements, including actual interest rate indices
and margins, contractual limitations and the U.S. Treasury yield curve as of the balance sheet
date. In addition we apply consistent parallel yield curve shifts (in both directions) to
determine possible changes in net interest income if the theoretical yield curve shifts occurred
gradually. Net interest income analysis also adjusts the dynamic asset and liability repricing
analysis based on changes in prepayment rates resulting from the parallel yield curve shifts.
Our dynamic asset and liability analysis determines the relative balance between the repricing of
assets and liabilities over multiple periods of time (ranging from overnight to five years). This
dynamic asset and liability analysis includes expected cash flows from loans and mortgage-backed
securities, applying prepayment rates based on the differential between the current interest rate
and the market interest rate for each loan and security type. This analysis identifies mismatches
in the timing of asset and liability but does not necessarily provide an accurate indicator of
interest rate risk because the assumptions used in the analysis may not reflect the actual response
to market changes.
Quantitative Analysis. The table below sets forth, as of March 31, 2009 the estimated changes in
our NPV and our annual net interest income that would result from the designated changes in the
interest rates. Such changes to interest rates are calculated as an immediate and permanent change
for the purposes of computing NPV and a gradual change over a one year period for the purposes of
computing net interest income. Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical
34
interest rate
changes are based on numerous assumptions including relative levels of market interest rates, loan
prepayments and deposit decay, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. We
did not estimate changes in NPV or net interest income for an interest rate decrease of greater
than 100 basis points or increase of greater than 200 basis points.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income (3) |
Change in |
|
Net Portfolio Value (1),(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Estimated |
Interest Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Increase (Decrease) |
|
Estimated Net |
|
Net Interest Income |
(basis points) |
|
Estimated NPV |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Interest Income |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
+200bp |
|
$ |
534,874 |
|
|
$ |
(261,825 |
) |
|
|
(32.9 |
)% |
|
$ |
176,443 |
|
|
$ |
(8,777 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
)% |
0bp |
|
$ |
796,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
185,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-100bp |
|
$ |
812,474 |
|
|
$ |
15,775 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
$ |
189,010 |
|
|
$ |
3,790 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
NPV is the discounted present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and
off-balance sheet contracts. |
|
(2) |
|
Assumes an instantaneous uniform change in interest rates at all maturities. |
|
(3) |
|
Assumes a gradual change in interest rates over a one year period at all maturities |
The table set forth above indicates at March 31, 2009 in the event of a 200 basis points increase
in interest rates, we would be expected to experience a 32.9% decrease in NPV and a $8.8 million or
4.7% decrease in annual net interest income. In the event of a 100 basis points decrease in
interest rates, we would be expected to experience a 2.0% increase in NPV and a $3.8 million or
2.0% increase in annual net interest income. These data do not reflect any future actions we may
take in response to changes in interest rates, such as changing the mix of our assets and
liabilities, which could change the results of the NPV and net interest income calculations.
As mentioned above, we retain two nationally recognized firms to compute our quarterly interest
rate risk reports. Although we are confident of the accuracy of the results, certain shortcomings
are inherent in any methodology used in the above interest rate risk measurements. Modeling
changes in NPV and net interest income require certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the
manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. The NPV and
net interest income table presented above assumes the composition of our interest-rate sensitive
assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the period being
measured and, accordingly, the data do not reflect any actions we may take in response to changes
in interest rates. The table also assumes a particular change in interest rates is reflected
uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration to maturity or the repricing
characteristics of specific assets and liabilities. Accordingly, although the NPV and net interest
income table provide an indication of our sensitivity to interest rate changes at a particular
point in time, such measurement is not intended to and does not provide a precise forecast of the
effects of changes in market interest rates on our NPV and net interest income.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that
evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of
35
the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or
submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
There were no significant changes made in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting
or in other factors that could significantly affect the Companys internal controls over financial
reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Part II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to various legal actions arising in the normal course
of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of these legal actions is not expected
to have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the Risk Factors disclosed in the Companys 2008 Annual
Report on Form 10-K and Form 10-Qs filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On January 22, 2008, the Company announced its third Share Repurchase Program, which authorized the
purchase of an additional 10% of its publicly-held outstanding shares of common stock, or 4,307,248
shares. This program has no expiration date and has 3,514,617 shares yet to be purchased as of
March 31, 2009. There were no repurchases of our common stock during the third quarter of fiscal
2009.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable
36
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are either filed as part of this report or are incorporated herein by
reference:
|
3.1 |
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Investors Bancorp, Inc.* |
|
|
3.2 |
|
Bylaws of Investors Bancorp, Inc.* |
|
|
4 |
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate of Investors Bancorp, Inc.* |
|
|
10.1 |
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Investors Bancorp, Inc. and certain
executive officers* |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement between Investors Bancorp, Inc. and certain
executive officers * |
|
|
10.3 |
|
Investors Savings Bank Director Retirement Plan* |
|
|
10.4 |
|
Investors Savings Bank Supplemental Retirement Plan* |
|
|
10.5 |
|
Investors Bancorp, Inc. Supplemental Wage Replacement Plan* |
|
|
10.6 |
|
Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan** |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed as exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, and any amendments
thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Registration No. 333-125703) |
|
** |
|
Filed as Appendix A to the Companys definitive proxy statement with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of September 26, 2008. |
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investors Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
Dated: May 11, 2009 |
/s/ Kevin Cummings
|
|
|
Kevin Cummings |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 11, 2009 |
/s/ Thomas F. Splaine, Jr.
|
|
|
Thomas F. Splaine, Jr. |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|