FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number: 001-16577
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter).
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
38-3150651 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
5151 Corporate Drive, Troy, Michigan
|
|
48098-2639 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(248) 312-2000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days.
Yes þ No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ.
As of July 29, 2009, 468,529,878 shares of the registrants common stock, $0.01 par value,
were issued and outstanding.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains certain forward-looking statements with respect to the financial
condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of Flagstar
Bancorp, Inc. (Flagstar or the Company) and these statements are subject to risk and
uncertainty. Forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995, include those using words or phrases such as believes, expects,
anticipates, plans, trend, objective, continue, remain, pattern or similar
expressions or future or conditional verbs such as will, would, should, could, might,
can, may or similar expressions.
There are a number of important factors that could cause future results to differ materially
from historical performance and these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a
difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed under the heading Risk Factors in
Part I, Item 1A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
and under Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q,
including: (1) our business has been and may continue to be adversely affected by conditions in the
global financial markets and economic conditions generally; (2) general business, economic and
political conditions may significantly affect our earnings; (3) we depend on our institutional
counterparties to provide services that are critical to our business. If one of more of our
institutional counterparties defaults on its obligations to us or becomes insolvent, it could have
a material adverse affect our earnings, liquidity, capital position and financial condition; (4)
defaults by another larger financial institution could adversely affect financial markets
generally; (5) if we cannot effectively manage the impact of the volatility of interest rates, our
earnings could be adversely affected; (6) the value of our mortgage servicing rights could decline
with reduction in interest rates; (7) certain hedging strategies that we use to manage our
investment in mortgage servicing rights may be ineffective to offset any adverse changes in the
fair value of these assets due to changes in interest rates; (8) we use estimates in determining
fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in
significant declines in valuation; (9) changes in the fair value or ratings downgrades of our
securities may reduce our stockholders equity, net earnings, or regulatory capital ratios; (10)
current and further deterioration in the housing and commercial real estate markets may lead to
increased loss severities and further increases in delinquencies and non-performing assets in our
loan portfolios. Additionally, the performance of our standby and commercial letters of credit may
be adversely affected as well. Consequently, our allowance for loan losses and guarantee liability
may not be adequate to cover actual losses, and we may be required to materially increase our
reserves; (11) our secondary market reserve for losses could be insufficient; (12) our home lending
profitability could be significantly reduced if we are not able to resell mortgages; (13) our
commercial real estate and commercial business loan portfolios carry heightened credit risk; (14)
our ability to borrow funds, maintain or increase deposits or raise capital could be limited, which
could adversely affect our liquidity and earnings; (15) our inability to realize our deferred tax
assets may have a material adverse affect on our consolidated results of operations and our
financial condition; (16) we may be required to raise capital at terms that are materially adverse
to our stockholders; (17) our holding company is dependent on the Bank for funding of obligations
and dividends; (18) future dividend payments and equity repurchases are restricted by the terms of
the Treasurys equity investment in us; (19) we may not be able to replace key members of senior
management or attract and retain qualified relationship managers in the future; (20) the network
and computer systems on which we depend could fail or experience a security breach; (21) our
business is highly regulated; (22) our business has volatile earnings because it operates based on
a multi-year cycle; (23) our loans are geographically concentrated in only a few states; (24) we
are subject to heightened regulatory scrutiny with respect to bank secrecy and anti-money
laundering statutes and regulations; (25) we are a controlled company that is exempt from certain
NYSE corporate governance requirements; and (26) current and further deterioration in the housing market, as well as the number
of programs that have been introduced to address the situation by government agencies
and government sponsored enterprises, may lead to increased costs to service loans which
could affect our margins or impair the value of our mortgage servicing rights.
The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any
forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after
the date of such statements.
2
FLAGSTAR BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company are as follows:
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition June 30, 2009 (unaudited) and December 31,
2008.
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations For the six and three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Loss For the six months
ended
June 30, 2009 (unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008.
Unaudited Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(In thousands, except for share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash items |
|
$ |
687,872 |
|
|
$ |
300,989 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
236,317 |
|
|
|
205,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
924,189 |
|
|
|
506,905 |
|
Securities classified as trading |
|
|
1,603,480 |
|
|
|
542,539 |
|
Securities classified as available for sale |
|
|
734,827 |
|
|
|
1,118,453 |
|
Other investments restricted |
|
|
39,300 |
|
|
|
34,532 |
|
Loans available for sale ($2,974,186 at fair value on June 30, 2009) |
|
|
3,009,740 |
|
|
|
1,484,680 |
|
Loans held for investment |
|
|
8,417,849 |
|
|
|
9,082,121 |
|
Less: allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(474,000 |
) |
|
|
(376,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for investment, net |
|
|
7,943,849 |
|
|
|
8,706,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
13,567,513 |
|
|
|
12,092,241 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
56,104 |
|
|
|
55,961 |
|
Repossessed assets, net |
|
|
131,620 |
|
|
|
109,297 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
373,443 |
|
|
|
373,443 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
244,229 |
|
|
|
246,229 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights at fair value |
|
|
658,209 |
|
|
|
511,294 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights, net |
|
|
6,083 |
|
|
|
9,469 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
698,219 |
|
|
|
504,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
16,423,292 |
|
|
$ |
14,203,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
9,470,673 |
|
|
$ |
7,841,005 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
5,151,907 |
|
|
|
5,200,000 |
|
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
108,000 |
|
|
|
108,000 |
|
Long term debt |
|
|
300,207 |
|
|
|
248,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
15,030,787 |
|
|
|
13,397,665 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
36,453 |
|
|
|
36,062 |
|
Secondary market reserve |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
42,500 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
395,531 |
|
|
|
255,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
15,507,771 |
|
|
|
13,731,364 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $0.01 par value, liquidation value $1,000 per share
25,000,000 shares authorized; 266,657 issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.01 par value, 750,000,000 shares authorized;
468,529,878 and 83,626,726 shares issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
4,685 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
Additional paid in capital preferred |
|
|
241,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid in capital common |
|
|
443,070 |
|
|
|
119,024 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(96,448 |
) |
|
|
(81,742 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
323,086 |
|
|
|
434,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
915,521 |
|
|
|
472,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
16,423,292 |
|
|
$ |
14,203,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
156,761 |
|
|
$ |
177,582 |
|
|
$ |
315,383 |
|
|
$ |
353,876 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,576 |
|
Securities classified as available for sale and trading |
|
|
30,659 |
|
|
|
21,171 |
|
|
|
56,136 |
|
|
|
36,761 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
4,145 |
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
187,848 |
|
|
|
200,564 |
|
|
|
372,826 |
|
|
|
411,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
66,547 |
|
|
|
70,817 |
|
|
|
133,897 |
|
|
|
154,867 |
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
57,284 |
|
|
|
63,327 |
|
|
|
114,093 |
|
|
|
127,885 |
|
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
2,319 |
|
|
|
4,362 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,834 |
|
|
|
3,814 |
|
|
|
5,770 |
|
|
|
8,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
127,831 |
|
|
|
139,165 |
|
|
|
256,079 |
|
|
|
295,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
60,017 |
|
|
|
61,399 |
|
|
|
116,747 |
|
|
|
116,197 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
125,662 |
|
|
|
43,833 |
|
|
|
283,876 |
|
|
|
78,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest (expense) income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
(65,645 |
) |
|
|
17,566 |
|
|
|
(167,129 |
) |
|
|
38,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan fees and charges |
|
|
35,022 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
67,944 |
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
Deposit fees and charges |
|
|
7,984 |
|
|
|
6,815 |
|
|
|
15,217 |
|
|
|
12,846 |
|
Loan administration |
|
|
41,853 |
|
|
|
37,370 |
|
|
|
10,053 |
|
|
|
20,324 |
|
Net gain on loan sales |
|
|
104,664 |
|
|
|
43,826 |
|
|
|
300,358 |
|
|
|
107,252 |
|
Net loss on sales of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
(2,544 |
) |
|
|
(834 |
) |
|
|
(2,626 |
) |
|
|
(547 |
) |
Net gain on sales of securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,869 |
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment (losses) recoveries |
|
|
8,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103,633 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(Losses) recoveries recognized in other comprehensive
income (before taxes) |
|
|
8,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86,064 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on trading securities |
|
|
(42,485 |
) |
|
|
(4,104 |
) |
|
|
(31,273 |
) |
|
|
(13,586 |
) |
Other fees and charges |
|
|
(9,630 |
) |
|
|
11,718 |
|
|
|
(16,608 |
) |
|
|
20,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
134,537 |
|
|
|
100,277 |
|
|
|
325,496 |
|
|
|
152,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
71,638 |
|
|
|
52,084 |
|
|
|
163,427 |
|
|
|
106,077 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
17,499 |
|
|
|
20,437 |
|
|
|
36,378 |
|
|
|
40,258 |
|
Asset resolution |
|
|
17,977 |
|
|
|
8,039 |
|
|
|
42,850 |
|
|
|
11,780 |
|
Communication |
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
3,586 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
61,979 |
|
|
|
10,991 |
|
|
|
106,377 |
|
|
|
19,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
171,818 |
|
|
|
93,736 |
|
|
|
354,487 |
|
|
|
182,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings before federal income taxes |
|
|
(102,926 |
) |
|
|
24,107 |
|
|
|
(196,120 |
) |
|
|
8,148 |
|
(Benefit) provision for federal income taxes |
|
|
(31,261 |
) |
|
|
8,361 |
|
|
|
(59,957 |
) |
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Earnings |
|
|
(71,665 |
) |
|
|
15,746 |
|
|
|
(136,163 |
) |
|
|
5,146 |
|
Preferred stock dividends/accretion |
|
|
(4,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Earnings Applicable To Common Stock |
|
$ |
(76,586 |
) |
|
$ |
15,746 |
|
|
$ |
(144,004 |
) |
|
$ |
5,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
(0.88 |
) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
(0.88 |
) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Loss
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Preferred |
|
Common |
|
Additional Paid in Capital |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Treasury |
|
Retained |
|
Stockholders |
|
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Preferred |
|
Common |
|
Loss |
|
Stock |
|
Earnings |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
637 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
64,350 |
|
|
$ |
(11,495 |
) |
|
$ |
(41,679 |
) |
|
$ |
681,165 |
|
|
$ |
692,978 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(275,407 |
) |
|
|
(275,407 |
) |
Reclassification of gain on
dedesignation of swaps used in
cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236 |
) |
Reclassification of gain on sale of
securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,262 |
) |
Reclassification of loss on securities
available for sale due to other than
temporary impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,541 |
|
Change in net unrealized loss on
securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345,654 |
) |
Cumulative effect adjustment due to
change of accounting for residential
MSR mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,417 |
|
|
|
28,417 |
|
Issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,797 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,361 |
|
Issuance of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,092 |
|
Conversion of preferred stock |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,796 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,797 |
) |
Restricted stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(587 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
Tax effect from stock-based
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,024 |
|
|
|
(81,742 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,175 |
|
|
|
472,293 |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136,163 |
) |
|
|
(136,163 |
) |
Reclassification of loss on securities
available for sale due to other-than-
temporary impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,420 |
|
Change in net unrealized loss on
securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117,955 |
) |
Cumulative effect for adoption of FSP
FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507,494 |
|
Conversion of preferred stock |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
(268,574 |
) |
|
|
264,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to
management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,321 |
|
Reclassification of Treasury Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,673 |
|
Issuance of common stock for exercise
of May Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,376 |
|
Restricted stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,629 |
) |
|
|
(5,629 |
) |
Accretion of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458 |
|
Tax effect from stock-based
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
4,685 |
|
|
$ |
241,125 |
|
|
$ |
443,070 |
|
|
$ |
(96,448 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
323,086 |
|
|
$ |
915,521 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) earning |
|
$ |
(136,163 |
) |
|
$ |
5,146 |
|
Adjustments to net (loss) earnings to net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
283,876 |
|
|
|
78,096 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,957 |
|
|
|
13,011 |
|
Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance in mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
Loss on fair value of residential mortgage servicing rights, net of hedging gains |
|
|
13,887 |
|
|
|
44,064 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
Loss on interest rate swap |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
Net loss on the sale of assets |
|
|
1,464 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Net gain on loan sales |
|
|
(300,358 |
) |
|
|
(107,252 |
) |
Net loss on sales of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
2,626 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
Net loss (gain) on securities classified as available for sale |
|
|
17,569 |
|
|
|
(4,869 |
) |
Net loss on trading securities |
|
|
31,273 |
|
|
|
13,586 |
|
Proceeds from sales of trading securities |
|
|
518,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of loans available for sale |
|
|
16,761,330 |
|
|
|
12,242,515 |
|
Origination and repurchase of mortgage loans available for sale, net of principal
repayments |
|
|
(18,692,067 |
) |
|
|
(13,593,576 |
) |
Purchase of trading securities, net of principal repayments |
|
|
(783,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
6,418 |
|
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(193,234 |
) |
|
|
(169,183 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
(4,317 |
) |
Net tax effect for stock grants issued |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
Decrease in federal income taxes payable |
|
|
(10,270 |
) |
|
|
(34,161 |
) |
Increase in other liabilities |
|
|
101,094 |
|
|
|
22,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(2,368,179 |
) |
|
|
(1,486,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in other investments |
|
|
(4,768 |
) |
|
|
(2,942 |
) |
Repayment of mortgage-backed securities held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,846 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
899,855 |
|
Repayment of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
56,608 |
|
|
|
104,090 |
|
Proceeds from sales of portfolio loans |
|
|
29,961 |
|
|
|
1,265,066 |
|
Origination of portfolio loans, net of principal repayments |
|
|
325,416 |
|
|
|
182,688 |
|
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,499 |
) |
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary |
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the disposition of repossessed assets |
|
|
122,970 |
|
|
|
41,419 |
|
Acquisitions of premises and equipment, net of proceeds |
|
|
(7,724 |
) |
|
|
(17,305 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
27,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
551,546 |
|
|
|
2,539,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposit accounts |
|
|
1,629,668 |
|
|
|
(758,556 |
) |
Net decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(48,093 |
) |
|
|
(565,000 |
) |
Net receipt of payments of loans serviced for others |
|
|
35,279 |
|
|
|
(10,029 |
) |
Net receipt of escrow payments |
|
|
20,356 |
|
|
|
17,585 |
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
Net tax effect of stock grants issued |
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
Issuance of junior subordinated debt |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
544,365 |
|
|
|
45,797 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
6,696 |
|
|
|
8,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Issuance of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,092 |
|
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(3,889 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
2,233,917 |
|
|
|
(1,220,673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
417,284 |
|
|
|
(167,482 |
) |
Beginning cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
506,905 |
|
|
|
340,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
924,189 |
|
|
$ |
172,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for investment transferred to repossessed assets |
|
$ |
333,630 |
|
|
$ |
93,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest payments made on deposits and other borrowings |
|
$ |
255,688 |
|
|
$ |
299,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income taxes paid |
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
$ |
5,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of mortgage loans originated available for sale then transferred to held for
investment loans |
|
$ |
29,961 |
|
|
$ |
1,255,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights resulting from sale or securitization of loans |
|
$ |
191,261 |
|
|
$ |
203,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of mortgage backed securities held to maturity to securities available for
sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,163,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of mandatory convertible participating voting preferred stock to common stock |
|
$ |
271,577 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
9
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Nature of Business
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. (Flagstar or the Company), is the holding company for Flagstar
Bank, FSB (the Bank), a federally chartered stock savings bank founded in 1987. With $16.4
billion in assets at June 30, 2009, Flagstar is the largest insured depository institution
headquartered in Michigan.
The Companys principal business is obtaining funds in the form of deposits and wholesale
borrowings and investing those funds in single-family mortgages and other types of loans. Its
primary lending activity is the acquisition or origination of single-family mortgage loans. The
Company may also originate consumer loans, commercial real estate loans, and non-real estate
commercial loans and it services a significant volume of residential mortgage loans for others.
The Company sells or securitizes substantially all of the mortgage loans that it originates,
and it generally retains the right to service the mortgage loans that it sells. These mortgage
servicing rights (MSRs) are occasionally sold by the Company in transactions separate from the
sale of the underlying mortgages. The Company may also invest in a portion of its loan production
in order to enhance the Companys leverage ability and to receive the interest spread between
earning assets and paying liabilities.
The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System (FHLB) and is subject to
regulation, examination and supervision by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) and the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The Banks deposits are insured by the FDIC through the
Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF).
Note 2. Recent Developments
Capital Investment
On December 17, 2008, the Company entered into an investment agreement with MP Thrift
Investments L.P. (MatlinPatterson), an entity formed by MP Thrift Global Partners III LLC, an
affiliate of MatlinPatterson Global Advisors LLC, for the purchase by MatlinPatterson of 250,000
shares of a newly authorized series of our convertible participating voting preferred stock for
$250 million. On January 30, 2009, MatlinPatterson consummated the purchase. Upon consummation,
the Company became a controlled company, as defined in the rules of the New York Stock Exchange
(the NYSE), based on MatlinPattersons beneficial ownership of a majority of the Companys voting
stock. As a controlled company, the Company is exempt from certain of the NYSEs corporate
governance requirements, including the requirement to maintain a majority of independent directors
and requirements related to the compensation committee and the nomination/corporate governance
committee. The terms of the preferred stock allowed MatlinPatterson to vote such shares on an
as-converted basis and, as a result, MatlinPatterson controlled approximately 77.6% of the voting
power of the Company as of January 30, 2009. Such preferred shares automatically converted, at
$0.80 per share, into 312.5 million shares of the Companys common stock upon stockholder approval
authorizing additional shares of common stock on May 26, 2009.
In addition, on January 30, 2009, certain of the Companys officers and directors acquired in
the aggregate, 6.65 million shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.80 per share for a
total of $5.32 million. The preferred stock and the common stock were each offered and sold to
individual accredited investors in an offering exempt from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act).
Also, on January 30, 2009, the Company entered into a closing agreement with MatlinPatterson
pursuant to which it agreed to sell to MatlinPatterson (i) an additional $50 million of convertible
preferred stock substantially in the form of the Preferred Stock, in two equal parts, on
substantially the same terms as the $250 million investment by MatlinPatterson (the Additional
Preferred Stock) and (ii) $50 million of trust preferred securities with a 10% coupon (the Trust
Preferred Securities). On February 17, 2009, MatlinPatterson acquired the first $25 million of
the Additional Preferred Stock, pursuant to which the Company issued 25,000 shares of the
Additional Preferred Stock with a conversion price of $0.80 per share. On February 27, 2009,
MatlinPatterson acquired the second $25 million of the Additional Preferred Stock, pursuant to
which the Company issued 25,000 shares of the Additional Preferred Stock with a conversion price
of $0.80 per share. Upon receipt of stockholder approval on May 26, 2009, the 50,000 shares of
Additional Preferred Stock automatically converted into 62.5 million shares of the Companys common
stock. On June 30, 2009, MatlinPatterson acquired the $50 million of Trust Preferred Securities
pursuant to which the Company issued 50,000 shares that are convertible into common stock at the
option of MatlinPatterson on April 1, 2010 at a conversion price of 90% of the volume
weighted-average price per share of common stock during the period from February 1, 2009 to April
1, 2010, subject to a price per share minimum of $0.80 and maximum
10
of $2.00. If the Trust Preferred Securities are not converted, they will remain outstanding
perpetually unless redeemed by the Company at any time after January 30, 2011.
Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)
On January 30, 2009, the Company sold to the United States Department of Treasury (the
Treasury), 266,657 shares of the Companys fixed rate cumulative non-convertible perpetual
preferred stock for $266.7 million, and a warrant (the Treasury Warrant) to purchase up to
approximately 64.5 million shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $0.62 per
share, subject to certain anti-dilution and other adjustments. The issuance and the sale of the
preferred stock and Treasury Warrant were exempt from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act. The preferred stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and pays cumulative dividends
quarterly at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and 9% per annum thereafter. The
Treasury Warrant became exercisable upon receipt of stockholder approval on May 26, 2009 and has a
10 year term.
Issuance of Warrants to Certain Stockholders
In full satisfaction of the Companys obligations under anti-dilution provisions applicable to
certain investors (the May Investors) in the Companys May 2008 private placement capital raise,
the Company granted warrants (the May Investor Warrants) to the May Investors on January 30, 2009
for the purchase of 14,259,794 shares of the Companys common stock at $0.62 per share. The
holders of such warrants are entitled to acquire the Companys common shares for a period of ten
years. As of June 30, 2009, 3,148,393 shares of the Companys common stock have been issued upon exercise of certain May
Investor Warrants.
Based on managements analysis the May Investor Warrants do not meet the definition of a
contract that is indexed to the Companys own stock under accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). Therefore, the May Investor Warrants are classified
as liabilities and are measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized through
operations. See Note 12, Warrant Liabilities.
Note 3. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated. In accordance with current accounting principles, the Companys trust
subsidiaries are not consolidated. In addition, certain prior period amounts have been
reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim information and in accordance
with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Accordingly, they do not include all the
information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The
accompanying interim financial statements are unaudited; however, in the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. The results of operations for the three and six month period ended June 30,
2009, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2009. We have evaluated the financial statements for subsequent events through the
date of the filing of the Form 10-Q. For further information, you should refer to the consolidated
financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008, which can be found on the Companys Investor Relations web page,
at www.flagstar.com , and on the website of the SEC, at www.sec.gov.
Note 4. Recent Accounting Developments
In November 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS 160,
Non-controlling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment to ARB No. 51. SFAS
160 changes the way consolidated net earnings are presented. The new standard requires
consolidated net earnings to be reported at amounts attributable to both the parent and the
non-controlling interest and will require disclosure on the face of the consolidated statement of
operations amounts attributable to the parent and the non-controlling interest. The adoption of
this statement is intended to result in more transparent reporting of the net earnings attributable
to the non-controlling interest. The statement establishes a single method of accounting for
changes in a parents ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation.
The statement also requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net earnings when a
subsidiary is deconsolidated. The adoption of SFAS 160 was effective for the Company on January 1,
2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial condition, results of operation or liquidity.
11
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 140-3, Accounting for
Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions. FSP 140-3 requires the
initial transfer of a financial asset and a repurchase financing that was entered into
contemporaneously with or in contemplation of the initial transfer, to be treated as a linked
transaction under SFAS 140, unless certain criteria are met, then the initial transfer and
repurchase will not be evaluated as a linked transaction, but will be evaluated separately under
SFAS 140. FSP FAS 140-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and
interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of FSP FAS 140-3 did not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
In June 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS 161 requires entities to provide
enhanced qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies with respect to an entitys
derivative and hedging activities. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 161 did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial
Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active. FSP FAS 157-3 clarifies the application of
SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements in an inactive market and provides key considerations in
determining the fair value of an asset where the market is not active. FSP FAS 157-3 was effective
immediately upon issuance. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-3 did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, Disclosures by Public
Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interest in Variable Interest
Entities. FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 require enhanced disclosures about the transfers of
financial assets and interests in variable interest entities. FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 are
effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2008. The adoption of
FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 amends the other-than-temporary
guidance to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation of
other-than-temporary impairments in the financial statements. The FSP modifies the current
indicator that, to avoid considering an impairment to be other-than temporary, management must
assert that it has both the intent and ability to hold an impaired security for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. The new FSP would require
management to assert that (a) it does not have the intent to sell the security and (b) it is more
likely than not that it will not have to sell the security before its recovery. The FSP changes
the total amount recognized in earnings when there are factors other than credit losses associated
with an impairment of a debt security. The impairment is separated into impairments related to
credit losses and impairments related to all other factors. The adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS
124-2 resulted in a cumulative adjustment increasing retained earnings and other comprehensive loss
by $50.6 million offset by a tax benefit of $17.7 million, or $32.9 million net of tax. The
cumulative adjustment represents the non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment, related
to securities available for sale, that the Company had recorded prior to January 1, 2009. See
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss in Note 13, Stockholders Equity.
In April 2009, FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That
Are Not Orderly. FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance on determining whether a market for a
financial asset is not active and a transaction is not distressed for fair value measurements under
SFAS 157. The adoption of FAS 157-4 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
In April 2009, FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, which requires disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments in
interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies that were previously only required to be
disclosed in annual financial statements. The provision of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 were adopted
by the Company effective January 1, 2009. As FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends only the disclosure
requirements about fair value of financial instruments in interim periods, the adoption of FSP FAS
107-1 and APB 28-1 did not affect the Companys consolidated statements of operations and financial
condition.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165, Subsequent Events. SFAS 165 establishes general
standards of accounting for and disclosure of subsequent events that occur after the balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, SFAS
165 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management should evaluate
events and transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial
statements, the circumstances under which events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet
date should be recognized and disclosures that should be made about events or transactions that
occurred after the balance sheet date. The adoption of this statement is effective for interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 165 did not affect the Companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
12
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial
Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. SFAS 166 amends the accounting for transfers of
financial assets, and is the principal accounting guidance governing the Companys private-label
asset securitization activities. Under SFAS No. 166, the Companys securitization transactions will
no longer be exempt from consolidation. SFAS 166 modifies the financial-components approach used
in SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities and limits the circumstances in which a financial asset, or a portion of a financial
asset, should be derecognized when the transferor has not transferred the entire original financial
asset to an entity that is not consolidated with the transferor in the financial statements being
presented and/or when the transferor has continuing involvement with the transferred financial
asset. The statement also requires that a transferor recognize and initially measure at fair
value, all assets obtained including beneficial interests and liabilities incurred as a result of
the transfer of financial assets accounted for as a sale. SFAS 166 will become effective for the
Company on January 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the adoption of SFAS
166 will have on its consolidated financial statements of condition, results of operations or
liquidity.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). SFAS 167
changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not
controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. SFAS 167 will become
effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the
adoption of SFAS 167 will have on its consolidated financial statements of condition, results of
operations or liquidity .
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. SFAS 168 will become the single source of
authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP, superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants (AICPA), Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF), and related accounting
literature. SFAS 168 reorganizes the thousands of GAAP pronouncements into roughly 90 accounting
topics and displays them using a consistent structure. Also included is relevant SEC guidance
organized using the same topical structure in separate sections. SFAS 168 will be effective for
financial statements issued for reporting periods that end after September 15, 2009. This will
have an impact on the Companys disclosures in its consolidated financial statements since all
future references to authoritative accounting literature will be referenced in accordance with SFAS
168.
Note 5. Fair Value Accounting
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, and SFAS 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS 157 establishes a framework
for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 was issued
to establish a uniform definition of fair value. The definition of fair value under SFAS 157 is
market-based as opposed to company-specific and includes the following:
|
|
|
Defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability, in either case through an orderly transaction between market
participants at a measurement date, and establishes a framework for measuring fair
value; |
|
|
|
|
Establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the
transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement
date; |
|
|
|
|
Nullifies the guidance in EITF 02-3, which required the deferral of profit at
inception of a transaction involving a derivative financial instrument in the absence of
observable data supporting the valuation technique; |
|
|
|
|
Eliminates large position discounts for financial instruments quoted in active
markets and requires consideration of the companys creditworthiness when valuing
liabilities; and |
|
|
|
|
Expands disclosures about instruments that are measured at fair value. |
SFAS 159 provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected
financial assets, financial liabilities, unrecognized Company commitments and written loan
commitments not previously recorded at fair value. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 159,
the Company, as of January 1, 2008, elected the fair value option for certain non-investment grade
residual securities from private-label securitizations. The Company elected fair value on these
residual securities and reclassified these investments to securities trading to provide
consistency in the accounting for the Companys residual interests.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company elected the fair value measurement method
for residential MSRs under SFAS 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets an amendment of
FASB 140. Upon election, the carrying value of the residential MSRs was increased to fair value by
recognizing a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of $43.7 million before tax, or
$28.4 million after tax. Management elected the fair value measurement method of accounting for
residential MSRs to be consistent with the fair value accounting method required for its risk
management strategy to hedge the fair value of these assets. Changes in the fair value of MSRs, as
well as changes in fair value of the related derivative instruments, are recognized each period
within loan administration income (loss) on the consolidated statement of operations.
13
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company elected the fair value option for the majority of its
loans available for sale in accordance with SFAS 159. Only loans available for sale originated
subsequent to January 1, 2009 are affected. Prior to the Companys fair value election, loans
available for sale were carried at the lower of aggregate cost or estimated fair value; therefore,
any increase in fair value to such loans was not realized until such loans were sold. The effect
on consolidated operations of this election amounted to recording additional gain on loans sales of
$20.3 million and $42.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively
based upon an increase in fair value during the period rather than at
a later time when the loans were sold. See Note 7, Loans Available
for Sale.
Determination of Fair Value
The Company has an established process for determining fair values. Fair value is based upon
quoted market prices, where available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is
based upon internally developed models that use primarily market-based or independently-sourced
market parameters, including interest rate yield curves and option volatilities. Valuation
adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These
adjustments include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality, creditworthiness, liquidity and
unobservable parameters that are applied consistently over time. Any changes to the valuation
methodology are reviewed by management to determine appropriateness of the changes. As markets
develop and the pricing for certain products becomes more transparent, the Company expects to
continue to refine its valuation methodologies.
The methods described above may produce a fair value estimate that may not be indicative of
net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes
its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of
different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments
could result in different estimates of fair values of the same financial instruments at the
reporting date.
Valuation Hierarchy
SFAS 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value
measurements. The valuation hierarchy favors the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an
asset or liability as of the measurement date and thereby favors use of Level 1 if appropriate
information is available, and otherwise Level 2 and finally Level 3 if Level 2 input is not
available. The three levels are defined as follows.
|
|
|
Level 1 Fair value is based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets in which the Company can participate. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Fair value is based upon quoted prices for similar (i.e., not identical)
assets and liabilities in active markets, and other inputs that are observable for the
asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the
financial instrument. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Fair value is based upon financial models using primarily unobservable
inputs. |
A financial instruments categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the
lowest level of input within the valuation hierarchy that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used by the Company for
instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments
pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
Assets
Securities classified as trading. These securities are comprised of U.S. government sponsored
agency mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Treasury bonds and non-investment grade residual securities
that arose from private-label securitizations of the Company. The U.S. government sponsored agency
mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury bonds trade in an active, open market with readily
observable prices and are therefore classified within the Level 1 valuation hierarchy. The
non-investment grade residual securities do not trade in an active, open market with readily
observable prices and are therefore classified within the Level 3 valuation hierarchy. Under Level
3, the fair value of residual securities is determined by discounting estimated net future cash
flows using expected prepayment rates and discount rates that approximate current market rates.
Estimated net future cash flows include assumptions related to expected credit losses on these
securities. The Company maintains a model that evaluates the default rate and severity of loss on
the residual securities collateral, considering such factors as loss experience, delinquencies,
loan-to-value ratios, borrower credit scores and property type. See Note 10, Private Label
Securitization Activity for the key assumptions used in the residual interest valuation process.
Securities classified as available for sale. These securities are comprised of U.S.
government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities and CMOs. Where quoted prices for
securities are available in an active market, those securities
14
are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If such quoted market prices are not
available, then fair values are estimated using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with
similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows. Due to illiquidity in the markets, the Company
determined the fair value of certain non-agency securities using internal valuation models and
therefore classified them within the Level 3 valuation hierarchy as these models utilize
significant inputs which are unobservable.
Other Investments. Other investments are primarily comprised of various mutual fund holdings.
These mutual funds trade in an active market and quoted prices are available. Other investments
are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
Loans available for sale. At June 30, 2009, the majority of the Companys loans originated
and classified as available for sale were reported at fair value and classified as Level 2. The
Company estimates the fair value of mortgage loans based on quoted market prices for securities
backed by similar types of loans. Otherwise, the fair value of loans is estimated using discounted
cash flows based upon managements best estimate of market interest rates for similar collateral.
At June 30, 2009, the Company continued to have a small number of loans which were originated prior
to the fair value election and accounted for at lower of cost or market.
Loans held for investment. The Company does not record these loans at fair value on
a recurring basis. However, from time to time a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for
loan losses is established. Loans are considered impaired if it is probable that payment of
interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. Once a loan is identified as impaired, the fair value of the impaired loan is estimated
using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise
value, liquidation value or discounted cash flows. Impaired loans do not require an allowance if
the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such
loans. At June 30, 2009, substantially all of the total impaired loans were evaluated based on the
fair value of the collateral rather than on discounted cash flows. Impaired loans where an
allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair
value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a
current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan as a nonrecurring Level 2 valuation.
Repossessed assets. Loans on which the underlying collateral has been repossessed are
adjusted to fair value upon transfer to repossessed assets. Subsequently, repossessed assets are
carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value, less anticipated marketing and selling costs.
Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or
managements estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is
based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the
repossessed asset as a nonrecurring Level 2 valuation.
Mortgage Servicing Rights. The Company has obligations to service residential first mortgage
loans, and consumer loans (i.e. home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) and second mortgage loans
obtained through private-label securitization transactions). Residential MSRs are accounted for at
fair value on a recurring basis. Servicing rights associated with consumer loans are carried at
amortized cost and are periodically evaluated for impairment.
Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights. The current market for residential mortgage
servicing rights is not sufficiently liquid to provide participants with quoted market prices.
Therefore, the Company uses an option-adjusted spread valuation approach to determine the fair
value of residential MSRs. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under
multiple interest rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted discount
rates. The key assumptions used in the valuation of residential MSRs include mortgage prepayment
speeds and discount rates. Management periodically obtains third-party valuations of the
residential MSR portfolio to assess the reasonableness of the fair value calculated by its internal
valuation model. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, residential MSRs are classified within
Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. See Note 11, Mortgage Servicing Rights for the key
assumptions used in the residential MSR valuation process.
Consumer Loan Servicing Rights. Consumer servicing assets are subject to periodic
impairment testing. A valuation model, which utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis using
interest rates and prepayment speed assumptions currently quoted for comparable instruments and a
discount rate determined by management, is used in the completion of impairment testing. If the
valuation model reflects a value less than the carrying value, consumer servicing assets are
adjusted to fair value through a valuation allowance as determined by the model. As such, the
Company classifies consumer servicing assets subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as
Level 3 valuations.
Derivative Financial Instruments. Certain classes of derivative contracts are listed on an
exchange and are actively traded, and they are therefore classified within Level 1 of the valuation
hierarchy. These include U.S. Treasury futures, U.S. Treasury options and interest rate swaps.
The Companys forward loan sale commitments may be valued based on quoted prices for similar assets
in an active market with inputs that are observable and are classified within Level 2 of the
valuation hierarchy. Rate lock commitments are valued using internal models with significant
unobservable market parameters and therefore are classified within Level 3 of the valuation
hierarchy.
15
Liabilities
Warrants. Warrant liabilities are valued using a binomial lattice model and are classified
within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Significant assumptions include expected volatility, a
risk free range and an expected life.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
The following table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of June 30,
2009, by caption on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition and by the valuation
hierarchy (as described above) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value in the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Condition |
|
|
|
Securities classified as trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual interests |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,402 |
|
|
$ |
16,402 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,587,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,587,078 |
|
Securities classified as available for sale |
|
|
180,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
554,055 |
|
|
|
734,827 |
|
Loans available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,974,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,974,186 |
|
Residential mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658,209 |
|
|
|
658,209 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
39,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,300 |
|
Derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,200 |
|
|
|
29,200 |
|
Forward loan commitments |
|
|
3,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,463 |
|
Agency forwards |
|
|
(24,677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,677 |
) |
Treasury futures |
|
|
5,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,737 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(1,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,240 |
) |
Warrant liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,778 |
) |
|
|
|
Total assets and liabilities at fair
value |
|
$ |
1,790,433 |
|
|
$ |
2,968,408 |
|
|
$ |
1,257,866 |
|
|
$ |
6,016,707 |
|
|
|
|
Changes in Level 3 fair value measurements
A determination to classify a financial instrument within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy
is based upon the significance of the unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurement.
However, Level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or Level
3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be
validated to external sources). Accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include
changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are included within the valuation
methodology. Also, the Company manages the risk associated with the observable components of Level
3 financial instruments using securities and derivative positions that are classified within Level
1 or Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy; these Level 1 and Level 2 risk management instruments are
not included below, and therefore the gains and losses in the tables do not reflect the effect of
the Companys risk management activities related to such Level 3 instruments.
16
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs
The table below includes a rollforward of the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition
amounts for the six months ended June 30, 2009 (including the change in fair value) for financial
instruments classified by the Company within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
issuances |
|
Transfers |
|
|
|
|
|
instruments |
|
|
Fair value, |
|
realized/ |
|
and |
|
in and/or |
|
Fair value, |
|
held at |
Six months ended |
|
January 1, |
|
unrealized |
|
settlements, |
|
out of |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
June 30, 2009 |
|
2009 |
|
gains/(losses) |
|
net |
|
Level 3 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Securities classified as trading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual interests |
|
$ |
24,808 |
|
|
$ |
(8,406 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,402 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Securities classified as
available for sale(a) |
|
|
563,083 |
|
|
|
15,769 |
|
|
|
(24,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
554,055 |
|
|
|
33,338 |
|
Residential mortgage servicing
rights |
|
|
511,294 |
|
|
|
(44,343 |
) |
|
|
191,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial
Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
|
78,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,177,798 |
|
|
$ |
(36,980 |
) |
|
$ |
117,048 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,257,866 |
|
|
$ |
33,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Realized gains (losses), including unrealized losses deemed other-than-temporary and
related to credit issues, are reported in non-interest income. Unrealized gains (losses)
are reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss. |
The Company also has assets that under certain conditions are subject to
measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These include assets that are measured at the
lower of cost or market and had a fair value below cost at the end of the period as summarized
below (in thousands).
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
Loans held for investment |
|
$ |
460,400 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
460,400 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Repossessed assets |
|
|
131,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loan servicing rights |
|
|
6,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,083 |
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
598,103 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
592,020 |
|
|
$ |
6,083 |
|
|
|
|
Financial Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments Required by FSP FAS 107-1
FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,
requires disclosures of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments and the methods
and significant assumptions used to estimate their fair values. Certain financial instruments and
all nonfinancial instruments are excluded from the scope of FSP FAS 107-1. Accordingly, the fair
value disclosures required by FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 are only indicative of the value of
individual financial instruments as of the dates indicated and should not be considered an
indication of the fair value of the Company.
17
The following table presents the carrying amount and estimated fair value of certain financial
instruments (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
924,189 |
|
|
$ |
924,189 |
|
|
$ |
506,905 |
|
|
$ |
506,905 |
|
Securities trading |
|
|
1,603,480 |
|
|
|
1,603,480 |
|
|
|
542,539 |
|
|
|
542,539 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
734,827 |
|
|
|
734,827 |
|
|
|
1,118,453 |
|
|
|
1,118,453 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
39,300 |
|
|
|
39,300 |
|
|
|
34,532 |
|
|
|
34,532 |
|
Loans available for sale |
|
|
3,009,740 |
|
|
|
3,000,733 |
|
|
|
1,484,680 |
|
|
|
1,526,031 |
|
Loans held for investment, net |
|
|
7,943,849 |
|
|
|
7,910,651 |
|
|
|
8,706,121 |
|
|
|
8,845,398 |
|
FHLB stock |
|
|
373,443 |
|
|
|
373,443 |
|
|
|
373,443 |
|
|
|
373,443 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits and savings accounts |
|
|
(1,731,608 |
) |
|
|
(1,731,608 |
) |
|
|
(1,386,330 |
) |
|
|
(1,386,330 |
) |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
(4,310,498 |
) |
|
|
(4,417,843 |
) |
|
|
(3,967,985 |
) |
|
|
(4,098,135 |
) |
Public funds |
|
|
(420,512 |
) |
|
|
(410,789 |
) |
|
|
(597,638 |
) |
|
|
(599,849 |
) |
National certificates of deposit |
|
|
(1,790,892 |
) |
|
|
(1,837,798 |
) |
|
|
(1,353,558 |
) |
|
|
(1,412,506 |
) |
Company controlled deposit |
|
|
(1,217,163 |
) |
|
|
(1,217,163 |
) |
|
|
(535,494 |
) |
|
|
(535,494 |
) |
FHLB advances |
|
|
(5,151,907 |
) |
|
|
(5,425,087 |
) |
|
|
(5,200,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,612,624 |
) |
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
(108,000 |
) |
|
|
(111,795 |
) |
|
|
(108,000 |
) |
|
|
(113,186 |
) |
Long term debt |
|
|
(300,207 |
) |
|
|
(284,041 |
) |
|
|
(248,660 |
) |
|
|
(247,396 |
) |
Warrant liabilities |
|
|
(5,778 |
) |
|
|
(5,778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward delivery contracts |
|
|
3,463 |
|
|
|
3,463 |
|
|
|
(61,256 |
) |
|
|
(61,256 |
) |
Commitments to extend credit |
|
|
29,200 |
|
|
|
29,200 |
|
|
|
78,613 |
|
|
|
78,613 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(1,240 |
) |
|
|
(1,240 |
) |
|
|
(1,280 |
) |
|
|
(1,280 |
) |
Treasury and agency futures/forwards |
|
|
(18,940 |
) |
|
|
(18,940 |
) |
|
|
60,813 |
|
|
|
60,813 |
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,219 |
|
|
|
17,219 |
|
The methods and assumptions that were used to estimate the fair value of financial assets and
financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are
discussed above. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value for
other financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and cash equivalents. Due to their short term nature, the carrying amount of cash and
cash equivalents approximates fair value.
Loans held for investment. The fair value of loans is estimated by using internally developed
discounted cash flow models using market interest rate inputs as well as managements best estimate
of spreads for similar collateral.
FHLB stock. No secondary market exists for FHLB stock. The stock is bought and sold at par
by the FHLB. Management believes that the recorded value is the fair value.
Deposit Accounts. The fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts approximates the
carrying amount. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the
rates currently offered for certificates of deposits with similar remaining maturities.
FHLB Advances. Rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and
remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of the existing debt.
Security Repurchase Agreements. Rates currently available for repurchase agreements with
similar terms and maturities are used to estimate fair values for these agreements.
18
Long Term Debt. The fair value of the long-term debt is estimated based on a discounted cash
flow model that incorporates the Companys current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing
arrangements.
Note 6. Investment Securities
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, investment securities were comprised of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Securities trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
$ |
1,587,078 |
|
|
$ |
517,731 |
|
Non-investment grade residual interests |
|
|
16,402 |
|
|
|
24,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities trading |
|
$ |
1,603,480 |
|
|
$ |
542,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agencies |
|
$ |
554,055 |
|
|
$ |
563,083 |
|
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
|
180,772 |
|
|
|
555,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
734,827 |
|
|
$ |
1,118,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments restricted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds |
|
$ |
39,300 |
|
|
$ |
34,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
Securities classified as trading are comprised of AAA-rated U.S. government sponsored agency
mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Treasury bonds, and non-investment grade residual interests from
private-label securitizations. U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities held in
trading are distinguished from available-for-sale based upon the intent of management to use them
as an economic offset against changes in the valuation of the MSR portfolio; however, these
securities do not qualify as an accounting hedge as defined in current accounting guidance for
derivatives and hedges.
The non-investment grade residual interests resulting from our private label securitizations
were $16.4 million at June 30, 2009 versus $24.8 million at December 31, 2008. Non-investment
grade residual securities classified as trading decreased as a result of the increase in the actual
and expected losses in the second mortgages and HELOCs that underly these assets.
The fair value of residual interests is determined by discounting estimated net future cash
flows using discount rates that approximate current market rates and expected prepayment rates.
Estimated net future cash flows include assumptions related to expected credit losses on these
securities. The Company maintains a model that evaluates the default rate and severity of loss on
the residual interests collateral, considering such factors as loss experience, delinquencies,
loan-to-value ratio, borrower credit scores and property type.
Available-for-Sale
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had $0.7 billion and $1.1 billion,
respectively, in securities classified as available-for-sale which were comprised of U.S.
government sponsored agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities. Securities
available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a
component of other comprehensive loss to the extent they are temporary in nature or
other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI) as to non-credit related issues. If losses are, at any
time, deemed to have arisen from OTTI, then the credit related portion is reported as an expense
for that period.
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and estimated fair value of U.S. government
sponsored agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities classified as available-for-sale (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
883,208 |
|
|
$ |
1,244,145 |
|
Gross unrealized holding gains |
|
|
4,057 |
|
|
|
10,522 |
|
Gross unrealized holding losses |
|
|
(152,438 |
) |
|
|
(136,214 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value |
|
$ |
734,827 |
|
|
$ |
1,118,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
The following table summarizes unrealized loss positions, at June 30, 2009, on securities
classified as available-for-sale categorized by the duration of the unrealized loss position
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Loss Position with Duration |
|
Unrealized Loss Position with |
|
|
12 Months and Over |
|
Duration Under 12 Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Unrealized |
Type of Security |
|
Principal |
|
Securities |
|
Loss |
|
Principal |
|
Securities |
|
Loss |
|
U.S. government
sponsored agency
securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,614 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations |
|
|
703,689 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(152,378 |
) |
|
|
37,596 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
703,689 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
(152,378 |
) |
|
$ |
39,210 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
The fair value of all other non-agency and U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed
securities is estimated based on market information.
The unrealized losses on securities-available-for-sale amounted to $152.4 million on $742.9
million of principal of agency and non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) at June
30, 2009. These CMOs consist of interests in investment vehicles backed by mortgage loans. In the
first quarter of 2009, the Company adopted new accounting guidance for investments. The new
accounting guidance changed the amount of impairment recognized in operations when there are credit
losses associated with an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security. The
other-than-temporary impairment is separated into impairments related to credit losses, which are
recorded in operations, and impairments related to all other factors, which are recorded to other
comprehensive income.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company recognized an other-than-temporary impairment
of $62.4 million on three collateralized mortgage obligations. Under the new accounting guidance
discussed in the previous paragraph, the credit loss portion of the other-than-temporary impairment
was $11.8 million while the impairment related to all other factors was $50.6 million. Effective
January 1, 2009, the $50.6 million loss, net of $17.7 million of tax benefit, was reclassified from
retained earnings to other comprehensive loss as a cumulative adjustment.
In the three months ended June 30, 2009, additional credit losses on investments with existing
other-than-temporary impairment credit losses totaled $0.3 million, which was recognized in current
operations. For the six month period ending June 30, 2009, additional credit losses on investments
totaled $17.6 million, which was recognized in current operations. No such impairments were
recognized during the same three or six month periods in 2008. At June 30, 2009, the total amount
of other-than-temporary impairment credit losses totaled $32.1 million.
At June 30, 2009, the Company had total other-than-temporary impairments of $176.2 million on
11 securities in the available-for-sale portfolio with $32.1 million in total credit losses
recognized through operations.
The following table shows the activity for the credit loss portion of OTTI for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions on |
|
Reductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions on |
|
Securities with |
|
for Sold |
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2009 |
|
Securities with |
|
Previous OTTI |
|
Securities |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
Balance |
|
No Prior OTTI |
|
Recognized |
|
with OTTI |
|
Balance |
|
|
|
Collateralized
Mortgage
Obligations |
|
$ |
(14,525 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,264 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,305 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(32,094 |
) |
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on the sale of U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities
available for sale that are recently created with underlying mortgage products originated by the
Bank are reported within net gain on loan sale. Securities in this category have typically remained
in the portfolio less than 90 days before sale. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, sales
of these agency securities with underlying mortgage products originated by the Bank were $45.2
million resulting in $0.8 million of net gain on loan sale versus $1.2 billion resulting in $4.5
million of net gain on loan sale during the same period in 2008. During the six months ended June
30, 2009, sales of agency securities with underlying mortgage products originated by the Bank were
$462.5 million resulting in $12.0 million of net gain on loan sale compared with a $1.7 million
gain on $2.7 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
20
Gain (loss) on sales for all other available for sale securities types are reported in net
gain on sale of available for sales securities. There were no such sales in the three months ended
June 30, 2009 while in the same period in 2008 the Company sold $0.9 billion in available for sale
securities resulting in a gain of $4.9 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we sold
no such securities. In the six months ended June 30, 2008, we sold $895.0 million in purchased
agency and non-agency securities available for sale. This sale generated a net gain on sale of
available for sale securities of $4.9 million.
As of June 30, 2009, the aggregate amount of available-for-sale securities from each of the
following non-agency issuers was greater than 10% of the Companys stockholders equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
Name of Issuer |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Countrywide Alternative Loan Trust |
|
$ |
96,089 |
|
|
$ |
60,685 |
|
Countrywide Home Loans |
|
|
223,588 |
|
|
|
172,336 |
|
Flagstar Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-1 |
|
|
211,335 |
|
|
|
192,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
531,012 |
|
|
$ |
425,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Investments Restricted
The Company has other investments in its insurance subsidiary which are restricted as to their
use. These assets can only be used to pay insurance claims in that subsidiary. These securities
had a fair value that approximates their recorded amount for each period presented.
Note 7. Loans Available for Sale
The following table summarizes loans available for sale (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Mortgage loans |
|
$ |
3,009,739 |
|
|
$ |
1,484,649 |
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,009,740 |
|
|
$ |
1,484,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through December 31, 2008, loans available for sale were carried at the lower of aggregate
cost or estimated fair value. As of December 31, 2008, these loans had an aggregate fair value
that exceeded their recorded amount. Effective January 1, 2009, the Company elected to record the
majority of its loans available for sale on the fair value method and as such no longer defers loan
fees or expenses related to these loans. Because the fair value method was required to be adopted
prospectively, only loans originated for sale subsequent to January 1, 2009 are affected. At June
30, 2009, $3.0 billion of loans available for sale were recorded at fair value. The Company
estimates the fair value of mortgage loans based on quoted market prices for securities backed by
similar types of loans. Where quoted market prices were available, such market prices were
utilized as estimates for fair values. Otherwise, the fair values of loans were estimated by
discounting estimated cash flows using managements best estimate of market interest rates for
similar collateral.
21
Note 8. Loans Held for Investment
Loans held for investment are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Mortgage loans |
|
$ |
5,529,395 |
|
|
$ |
5,958,748 |
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
246,895 |
|
|
|
287,350 |
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
1,692,052 |
|
|
|
1,779,363 |
|
Construction loans |
|
|
36,599 |
|
|
|
54,749 |
|
Warehouse lending |
|
|
383,368 |
|
|
|
434,140 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
508,309 |
|
|
|
543,102 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
21,231 |
|
|
|
24,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
8,417,849 |
|
|
|
9,082,121 |
|
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(474,000 |
) |
|
|
(376,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,943,849 |
|
|
$ |
8,706,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
466,000 |
|
|
$ |
121,400 |
|
|
$ |
376,000 |
|
|
$ |
104,000 |
|
Provision charged to operations |
|
|
125,662 |
|
|
|
43,833 |
|
|
|
283,876 |
|
|
|
78,095 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(119,583 |
) |
|
|
(11,987 |
) |
|
|
(189,025 |
) |
|
|
(29,179 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
1,921 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
3,149 |
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
474,000 |
|
|
$ |
154,000 |
|
|
$ |
474,000 |
|
|
$ |
154,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans on which interest accruals have been discontinued totaled approximately $940.8 million
and $363.9 million at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest on these loans is recognized
as income when collected. Interest that would have been accrued on such loans totaled
approximately $18.0 million and $7.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. There were no loans greater than 90 days past due, as determined using the OTS
method, still accruing interest at June 30, 2009 and 2008.
A loan is impaired when it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made
in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Impaired loans with no allowance for loan losses allocated(1) |
|
$ |
229,829 |
|
|
$ |
77,332 |
|
Impaired loans with allowance for loan losses allocated |
|
|
649,344 |
|
|
|
373,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
879,173 |
|
|
$ |
450,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of the allowance allocated to impaired loans |
|
$ |
186,399 |
|
|
$ |
121,321 |
|
Average investment in impaired loans |
|
$ |
632,237 |
|
|
$ |
265,448 |
|
Cash-basis interest income recognized during impairment |
|
$ |
13,647 |
|
|
$ |
10,601 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes loans for which the principal balance has been charged down to net realizable
value. |
Those impaired loans with no allowance for loan losses allocated represent loans for
which the fair value of the related collateral less estimated selling costs exceeded the recorded
investments in such loans. At June 30, 2009, approximately 78.5% of the total impaired loans were
evaluated based on the fair value of related collateral.
22
Note 9. Pledged Assets
The Company has pledged various assets to collateralize security repurchase agreements and
lines of credit and/or borrowings with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago or the Federal Home Loan
Bank of Indianapolis. The following table sets forth pledged assets by asset class. The principal
amount for pledged loans and the market value and range of maturities of pledged securities are
presented (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Maturities |
|
Securities trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
$ |
671,506 |
|
|
|
2039 |
|
|
$ |
517,731 |
|
|
|
2037-2039 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
|
118,502 |
|
|
|
2020-2038 |
|
|
|
119,951 |
|
|
|
2020-2038 |
|
Non-agencies collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
304,306 |
|
|
|
2035-2036 |
|
|
|
563,049 |
|
|
|
2035-2036 |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans |
|
|
6,344,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,724,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
208,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
HELOCs |
|
|
317,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
787,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
996,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
8,751,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,530,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10. Private-label Securitization Activity
During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not
consummate any private-label-securitizations transactions.
At June 30 2009, key assumptions used in determining the value of residual interests resulting
from the Companys private-label securitizations were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
Projected |
|
Annual |
|
Average |
|
|
at |
|
Prepayment |
|
Cumulative |
|
Discount |
|
Remaining Life |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Speed |
|
Credit Losses |
|
Rate |
|
(in years) |
|
|
|
2005 HELOC Securitization |
|
$ |
16,402 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
6.16 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
|
2006 HELOC Securitization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
24.57 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
|
2006 Second Mortgage Securitization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
5.53 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
|
2007 Second Mortgage Securitization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
11.22 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
|
Certain cash flows received from securitization trusts outstanding were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Proceeds from new securitizations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Proceeds from collections reinvested in
securitizations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,960 |
|
Servicing fees received |
|
|
1,416 |
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
2,911 |
|
|
|
3,433 |
|
Loan repurchases for representations and
warranties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
23
Credit Risk on Securitization
With respect to the issuance of private-label securitizations, the Company retains certain
limited credit exposure in that it retains non-investment grade residual securities in addition to
customary representations and warranties. The Company does not have credit exposure associated
with non-performing loans in securitizations beyond its residual interests and the amount of draws
on HELOCs that it funds and which are not reimbursed by the respective trust. The value of the
Companys residual interests reflects the Companys credit loss assumptions as to the underlying
collateral pool. To the extent that actual credit losses exceed these assumptions, the value of
the Companys residual interests will be diminished.
The following table summarizes the loan balance associated with the Companys servicing
portfolio and the balance of related retained assets with credit exposure, which includes residual
interests that are included as trading securities and unreimbursed HELOC draws that are included in
loans held for investment at June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of Retained |
|
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Assets with Credit |
|
|
|
Serviced |
|
|
Exposure |
|
Privatelabel securitizations |
|
$ |
1,062,567 |
|
|
$ |
74,903 |
|
U.S. government sponsored agencies |
|
|
60,468,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investors |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
61,531058 |
|
|
$ |
74,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans that have been securitized in private-label securitizations at June 30, 2009
and 2008 that are sixty days or more past due and the credit losses incurred in the securitization
trusts are presented below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Losses |
|
|
Total Principal |
|
Principal Amount |
|
(Net of Recoveries) |
|
|
Amount of Loans |
|
Of Loans 60 Days |
|
For the Six |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Or More Past Due |
|
Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized mortgages
loans |
|
$ |
1,062,567 |
|
|
$ |
1,284,069 |
|
|
$ |
54,757 |
|
|
$ |
33,970 |
|
|
$ |
78,112 |
|
|
$ |
28,657 |
|
Note 11. Mortgage Servicing Rights
The Company has obligations to service residential first mortgage loans and consumer loans
(HELOC and second mortgage loans obtained through private-label securitization transactions). A
description of these classes of servicing assets follows.
Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights. Servicing of residential first mortgage loans is a
significant business activity of the Company. The Company recognizes MSR assets on residential
first mortgage loans when it retains the obligation to service these loans upon sale. MSRs are
subject to changes in value from, among other things, changes in interest rates, prepayments of the
underlying loans and changes in credit quality of the underlying portfolio. Historically, the
Company has treated this risk as a counterbalance to the increased production and gain on loan sale
margins that tend to occur in an environment with increased prepayments. In the quarter ended
March 31, 2008, the Company began to specifically hedge the risk by hedging the fair value of MSRs
with derivative instruments which are intended to change in value inversely to part or all changes
in the value of MSRs.
24
Changes in the carrying value of residential MSRs, accounted for at fair value are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
511,294 |
|
|
$ |
402,243 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,719 |
|
Additions from loans sold with servicing retained |
|
|
191,258 |
|
|
|
203,722 |
|
Reductions from bulk sales |
|
|
(25,542 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payoffs(a) |
|
|
(72,208 |
) |
|
|
(32,526 |
) |
All other changes in valuation inputs or assumptions (b) |
|
|
53,407 |
|
|
|
44,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of MSRs at end of period |
|
$ |
658,209 |
|
|
$ |
661,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance of loans serviced for others |
|
$ |
60,468,491 |
|
|
$ |
44,546,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents decrease in MSR value associated with loans that paid off during the period. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents estimated MSR value change resulting primarily from market-driven changes
in interest rates and realization of expected cash flows. |
The fair value of residential MSRs is estimated using a valuation model that calculates the
present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration expected
mortgage loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors, which
were determined based on current market conditions. The Company periodically obtains third-party
valuations of its residential MSRs to assess the reasonableness of the fair value calculated by the
valuation model.
The key economic assumptions used in determining the fair value of residential MSRs
capitalized during the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 periods were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Weighted-average life (in years) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Weighted-average constant prepayment rate (CPR) |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
Weighted-average discount rate |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
The key economic assumptions used in determining the fair value of residential MSRs at period
end were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Weighted-average life (in years) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Weighted-average CPR |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
Weighted-average discount rate |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
Consumer Servicing Assets. Consumer servicing assets represent servicing rights related to
HELOC and second mortgage loans that were created in the Companys private-label securitizations.
These servicing assets are initially measured at fair value and subsequently accounted for using
the amortization method. Under this method, the assets are amortized in proportion to and over the
period of estimated servicing income and are evaluated for impairment on a periodic basis. When
the carrying value exceeds the fair value and is believed to be temporary, a valuation allowance is
established by a charge to loan administration income (loss) in the consolidated statement of
operations.
25
The fair value of consumer servicing assets is estimated using an internal valuation model. This
method is based on calculating the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows,
taking into consideration discount rates, prepayments, and servicing costs.
Changes in the carrying value of the consumer servicing assets and the associated valuation
allowance follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Consumer servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
9,469 |
|
|
$ |
11,914 |
|
Additions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From loans securitized with servicing retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
Subtractions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
(1,370 |
) |
|
|
(1,348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value before valuation allowance at end of period |
|
|
8,099 |
|
|
|
10,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
Impairment recoveries (charges) |
|
|
(2,016 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
(2,016 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value of servicing assets at end of period |
|
$ |
6,083 |
|
|
$ |
10,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance of consumer loans serviced for others |
|
$ |
1,062,567 |
|
|
$ |
1,284,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of servicing assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
$ |
12,284 |
|
|
$ |
11,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
7,672 |
|
|
$ |
10,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of consumer servicing assets
at June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Weighted-average life (in years) |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Weighted-average discount rate |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
Contractual Servicing Fees Contractual servicing fees, including late fees and ancillary
income, for each type of loan serviced are presented below. Contractual servicing fees are included
within loan administration income (loss) on the consolidated statements of operations (in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30 |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
$ |
39,241 |
|
|
$ |
33,616 |
|
|
$ |
77,693 |
|
|
$ |
62,269 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
|
2,940 |
|
|
|
3,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
40,665 |
|
|
$ |
35,241 |
|
|
$ |
80,633 |
|
|
$ |
65,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12. Warrant Liabilities
At June 30, 2009, the Company has liabilities to certain warrant holders amounting to $5.8
million. This amount relates to the liability for the May Investor Warrants. The warrant
liabilities are included within other liabilities in the Companys consolidated statement of
financial condition.
During the first quarter 2009, the Company recorded a Treasury Warrant liability that arose in
conjunction with the Companys participation in TARP because the Company did not have available an
adequate number of authorized and unissued common shares. As described in Note 13, Stockholders
Equity, the Company initially recorded the Treasury Warrant on January 30, 2009 at its fair value
of $27.7 million. The warrant was market to marked on March 31, 2009 resulting in an increase to
the warrant liability of $9.1 million. Upon stockholder approval on May 26, 2009 to increase the
26
number of authorized common shares, the Company marked the liability to market at that date and
reclassified the Treasury Warrant liability to additional paid in capital. The mark to market on
May 26, 2009 resulted in an increase to the warrant liability of $12.9 million during the second
quarter 2009. This increase was recorded as warrant expense and included in non-interest expense
under general and administrative.
As described in Note 2, Issuance of Warrants to Certain Stockholders, the Company, as a
result of the capital investments by MatlinPatterson and the Treasury, granted warrants to the May
Investors for the purchase of 14.3 million shares of the Companys common stock at $0.62 per share.
The warrants expire in ten years if not exercised. The May Investor Warrants, unlike the Treasury
Warrants, contain certain provisions that would allow the $0.62 exercise price to be reduced. As
such, these warrants are required to be accounted for as liabilities and recorded at fair value.
On January 30, 2009, in conjunction with the capital investments, the Company recorded the May
Investor Warrants at their fair value of $6.1 million. On March 31, 2009, the Company marked the
warrants to market resulting in an increase to the warrant liability of $2.0 million. On June 30,
2009, the Company marked these warrants to market which resulted in an increase in the liability of
$0.1 million during the second quarter 2009. This increase was recorded as warrant expense and
included in non-interest expense under general and administrative. The Company will mark the May
Investor Warrants to market quarterly until exercised. Also during the second quarter of 2009,
certain of the May Investors exercised their warrants for 3.1 million shares of the Companys
common stock. Upon exercise, the Company reclassified the portion of the May Investors Warrant
liability that related to the exercised warrants amounting to $2.4 million to additional paid in
capital.
Note 13. Stockholders Equity
Preferred Stock
Preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 and a liquidation value of $1,000 and
additional paid in capital attributable to preferred shares at June 30, 2009 is summarized as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earliest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Date |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Capital |
|
Series B convertible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Series C, TARP Capital
Purchase Program |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
January 31, 2012 |
|
|
266,657 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
241,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
241,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 30, 2009, MatlinPatterson purchased 250,000 shares of the Companys Series B
convertible participating voting preferred stock (the Preferred Stock) for $250 million. Such
preferred shares were to automatically convert at $0.80 per share into 312.5 million shares of the
Companys common stock upon stockholder approval authorizing additional shares of common stock.
Also on January 30, 2009, the Company entered into a closing agreement with MatlinPatterson
pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to MatlinPatterson an additional $50 million of
convertible preferred stock substantially in the form of the Preferred Stock, in two equal parts,
on substantially the same terms as the $250 million investment by MatlinPatterson (the Additional
Preferred Stock). On February 17, 2009, MatlinPatterson acquired the first $25 million of the
Additional Preferred Stock, pursuant to which the Company issued 25,000 shares of the Additional
Preferred Stock with a conversion price of $0.80 per share. On February 27, 2009, MatlinPatterson
acquired the second $25 million of the Additional Preferred Stock, pursuant to which the Company
issued 25,000 shares of the Additional Preferred Stock with a conversion price of $0.80 per share.
Upon receipt of stockholder approval on May 26, 2009, the 250,000 shares of the Preferred Stock
and the 50,000 shares of Additional Preferred Stock were automatically converted into an aggregate
of 375 million shares of the Companys common stock. The Company received proceeds from these
offerings of $300.0 million less costs attributable to the offerings of $28.4 million. Upon
conversion of the Preferred Stock and Additional Preferred Stock, the net proceeds of the offering
were reclassified to common stock and additional paid in capital attributable to common
stockholders.
On January 30, 2009, the Company sold to the Treasury, 266,657 shares of the Companys Series
C fixed rate cumulative non-convertible perpetual preferred stock for $266.7 million, and a warrant
to purchase up to 64.5 million shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $0.62
per share. The preferred stock and warrant qualify as Tier 1 capital. The preferred stock pays
cumulative dividends quarterly at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and 9% per annum
thereafter. The warrant is exercisable over a 10 year period. Because the Company did not have an
adequate number of authorized and unissued common shares at January 30, 2009 or at March 31, 2009,
the Company was required to initially classify such warrants as a liability and record the warrants
at their fair value of $27.7 million. Upon receipt of stockholder approval to authorize an
adequate number of common shares on May 26, 2009, the Company reclassified the warrants to
stockholders equity. The Companys Series C fixed rate cumulative non-convertible preferred stock
and additional paid in capital attributable to preferred stock was recorded in stockholders equity
as the difference between the cash received from the Treasury and the amount initially recorded as
a warrant liability, or $239.0 million. The discount on these preferred shares
27
is represented by the initial fair value of the warrants. This discount will be accreted to
additional paid in capital attributable to preferred shares over five years using the interest
method.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table sets forth the ending balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss for
each component (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of tax |
|
$ |
(96,448 |
) |
|
$ |
(81,742 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the changes to other comprehensive loss and the related tax
effect for each component (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six |
|
|
For the Year |
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Gain (reclassified to earnings) on interest rate swap derecognition |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(363 |
) |
Related tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
Gain (reclassified to earnings) on sales of securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,019 |
) |
Related tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
Loss (reclassified from retained earnings) for adoption of new accounting
guidance for investments debt and equity securities other-than-
temporary impairments |
|
|
(50,638 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Related tax benefit |
|
|
17,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (reclassified to earnings) for other-than-temporary impairment of
securities available for sale |
|
|
17,569 |
|
|
|
62,370 |
|
Related tax benefit |
|
|
(6,149 |
) |
|
|
(21,829 |
) |
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale |
|
|
10,444 |
|
|
|
(165,061 |
) |
Related tax benefit |
|
|
(3,656 |
) |
|
|
57,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
$ |
(14,706 |
) |
|
$ |
(70,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 14. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company follows the provisions of SFAS 133, as amended, for its derivative instruments and
hedging activities, which require it to recognize all derivative instruments on the consolidated
statements of financial condition at fair value. The following derivative financial instruments
were identified and recorded at fair value as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
-Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae and other forward loan sales contracts;
-Rate lock commitments;
-Interest rate swap agreements; and
-Treasury futures and options.
The Company hedges the risk of overall changes in fair value of loans held for sale and rate
lock commitments generally by selling forward contracts on securities of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac
and Ginnie Mae. The forward contracts used to economically hedge the loan commitments are
accounted for as non-designated hedges and naturally offset rate lock commitment mark-to-market
gains and losses recognized as a component of gain on loan sale. The Bank recognized pre-tax gains
of $8.6 million and $6.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
on its hedging activity relating to loans held for sale. The Bank recognized pre-tax gains of
$15.3 million and $26.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, on
its hedging activity relating to loans held for sale. Additionally the Company hedges the risk of
overall changes in fair value of MSRs through the use of various derivatives including purchasing
forward contracts on securities of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the purchase/sale of Treasury
futures contracts and options on Treasury futures contracts.
The Company occasionally uses interest rate swap agreements to reduce its exposure to interest
rate risk inherent in a portion of the current borrowings and anticipated deposits. A swap
agreement is a contract between two parties to exchange cash flows based on specified underlying
notional amounts and indices. Under SFAS 133, the swap agreements used to hedge the Companys
anticipated borrowings and advances qualify as cash flow hedges. Derivative gains and losses
reclassed from
28
accumulated other comprehensive loss to current period operations are included in the line item in
which the hedged cash flows are recorded. On January 1, 2008, the Company derecognized all cash
flow hedges.
The Company recognizes changes in hedge values from designated SFAS 133 hedges discussed above
in the same consolidated statement of operations captions where such change occurs.
The Company had the following derivative financial instruments (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
Notional |
|
Fair |
|
Expiration |
|
|
Amounts |
|
Value |
|
Dates |
Mortgage banking derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
$ |
1,962,781 |
|
|
$ |
29,200 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Forward loan sale commitments |
|
|
3,803,214 |
|
|
|
3,463 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury and agency futures/forwards |
|
|
2,845,000 |
|
|
|
(18,940 |
) |
|
|
2009 |
|
Borrowings and advances derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
(1,240 |
) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Notional |
|
Fair |
|
Expiration |
|
|
Amounts |
|
Value |
|
Dates |
Mortgage banking derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments |
|
$ |
6,250,222 |
|
|
$ |
78,613 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Forward loan sale commitments |
|
|
5,216,903 |
|
|
|
(61,256 |
) |
|
|
2009 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury and agency futures/forwards |
|
|
2,885,000 |
|
|
|
60,813 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Treasury options |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
17,219 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Borrowings and advances hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
(1,280 |
) |
|
|
2010 |
|
Counterparty Credit Risk
The Bank is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to
its various derivative financial instruments. The Company manages this risk by selecting only
large, well-established counterparties, spreading the credit risk among such counterparties, and by
placing contractual limits on the amount of unsecured credit risk from any single counterparty.
Note 15. Stock-Based Compensation
For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded stock-based
compensation expense of $0.2 million ($0.1 million net of tax) and $0.4 million ($0.2 million net
of tax), respectively. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $0.5 million ($0.3
million net of tax) for both the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Stock Options
During the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, there were no stock options granted.
Cash-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights
The Company issues cash-settled stock appreciation rights (SAR) to officers and key
employees in connection with year-end compensation. Cash-settled SARs generally vest at the rate
of 25% of the grant on each of the first four annual anniversaries of the grant date. The standard
term of a SAR is seven years beginning on the grant date. Grants of SARs may be settled only in
cash and once made, may not be later amended or modified to be settled in common stock or a
combination of common stock and cash.
29
The Company used the following weighted average assumptions in applying the Black-Scholes
model to determine the fair value of cash-settled SARs issued during the six months ended June 30,
2009: dividend yield of zero; expected volatility of 159.2%; a risk-free rate range of 1.11% to
2.09%; and an expected life range of 1.9 years to 3.6 years.
The following table presents the status and changes in cash-settled SARs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Stock Appreciation Rights Awarded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,315,599 |
|
|
$ |
10.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(402,677 |
) |
|
|
11.36 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(29,775 |
) |
|
|
10.52 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
883,147 |
|
|
|
10.06 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
The Company issues restricted stock to officers, directors and key employees in connection
with year-end compensation. Restricted stock generally will vest in 50% increments on each annual
anniversary following the date of grant. The Company incurred expenses of approximately $0.5
million and $0.6 million with respect to restricted stock for each of the periods ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. As of June 30, 2009, restricted stock outstanding had a market value
of $0.1 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
per Share |
|
Restricted Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
285,588 |
|
|
$ |
8.01 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(164,953 |
) |
|
|
8.85 |
|
Canceled and forfeited |
|
|
(3,678 |
) |
|
|
6.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
116,957 |
|
|
|
6.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 16. Segment Information
The Companys operations are broken down into two business segments: banking and home lending.
Each business operates under the same banking charter but is reported on a segmented basis for
this report. Each of the business lines is complementary to each other. The banking operation
includes the gathering of deposits and investing those deposits in duration-matched assets
primarily originated by the home lending operation. The banking group holds these loans in the
investment portfolio in order to earn income based on the difference or spread between the
interest earned on loans and the interest paid for deposits and other borrowed funds. The home
lending operation involves the origination, packaging, and sale of loans in order to receive
transaction income. The lending operation also services mortgage loans for others and sells MSRs
into the secondary market. Funding for the lending operation is provided by deposits and
borrowings garnered by the banking group. All of the non-bank consolidated subsidiaries are
included in the banking segment. No such subsidiary is material to the Companys overall
operations.
30
Following is a presentation of financial information by segment for the periods indicated (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
Home Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Combined |
|
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
28,429 |
|
|
$ |
31,588 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
60,017 |
|
Gain on sale revenue |
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
59,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,308 |
|
Other income |
|
|
36,608 |
|
|
|
38,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income and non-interest income |
|
|
64,710 |
|
|
|
129,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,554 |
|
(Loss) earnings before federal income taxes |
|
|
(148,160 |
) |
|
|
45,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,926 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,338 |
|
|
|
3,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,181 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,933 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
14,496,674 |
|
|
|
5,931,618 |
|
|
|
(4,005,000 |
) |
|
|
16,423,292 |
|
Inter-segment income (expense) |
|
|
30,038 |
|
|
|
(30,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
Home Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Combined |
|
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
77,702 |
|
|
$ |
39,045 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
116,747 |
|
Gain on sale revenue |
|
|
(17,569 |
) |
|
|
266,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,889 |
|
Other income |
|
|
47,571 |
|
|
|
29,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income and non-interest income |
|
|
107,704 |
|
|
|
334,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442,243 |
|
(Loss) earnings before federal income taxes |
|
|
(343,944 |
) |
|
|
147,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196,120 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,901 |
|
|
|
7,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,957 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
|
5,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,720 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
14,496,674 |
|
|
|
5,931,618 |
|
|
|
(4,005,000 |
) |
|
|
16,423,292 |
|
Inter-segment income (expense) |
|
|
66,450 |
|
|
|
(66,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
Home Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Combined |
|
2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
41,948 |
|
|
$ |
19,451 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
61,399 |
|
Gain on sale revenue |
|
|
4,869 |
|
|
|
42,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,861 |
|
Other income |
|
|
10,032 |
|
|
|
42,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income and non-interest income |
|
|
56,849 |
|
|
|
104,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,676 |
|
(Loss) earnings before federal income taxes |
|
|
(20,502 |
) |
|
|
44,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,107 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
3,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,108 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
6,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,486 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
13,653,177 |
|
|
|
3,747,816 |
|
|
|
(2,795,000 |
) |
|
|
14,605,993 |
|
Inter-segment income (expense) |
|
|
20,963 |
|
|
|
(20,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
Home Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Combined |
|
2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
70,819 |
|
|
$ |
45,378 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
116,197 |
|
Gain on sale revenue |
|
|
4,869 |
|
|
|
106,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,574 |
|
Other income |
|
|
13,887 |
|
|
|
27,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income and non-interest income |
|
|
89,575 |
|
|
|
179,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269,149 |
|
(Loss) earnings before federal income taxes |
|
|
(51,974 |
) |
|
|
60,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,148 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,480 |
|
|
|
7,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,639 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
10,400 |
|
|
|
6,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,279 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
13,653,177 |
|
|
|
3,747,816 |
|
|
|
(2,795,000 |
) |
|
|
14,605,993 |
|
Inter-segment income (expense) |
|
|
42,600 |
|
|
|
(42,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Where we say we, us, or our, we usually mean Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. In some cases, a
reference to we, us, or our will include our wholly-owned subsidiary Flagstar Bank, FSB, and
Flagstar Capital Markets Corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiary, which we collectively refer to
as the Bank.
General
Operations of the Bank are categorized into two business segments: banking and home lending.
Each segment operates under the same banking charter, but is reported on a segmented basis for
financial reporting purposes. For certain financial information concerning the results of
operations of our banking and home lending operations, see Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements, in Item 1, Financial Statements, herein.
Banking Operation. We provide a broad range of banking services to consumers and small
businesses in Michigan, Indiana and Georgia. We also gather deposits within these three states and
also via the internet. Our banking operation involves the gathering of deposits and investing
those deposits in duration-matched assets consisting primarily of mortgage loans originated by our
home lending operation. The banking operation holds these loans in its loans held for investment
portfolio in order to earn income based on the difference, or spread, between the interest earned
on loans and investments and the interest paid for deposits and other borrowed funds. At June 30,
2009, we operated a network of 175 banking centers and provided banking services to approximately
144,800 customers. During the first six months of 2009, we opened two banking centers, including
one in Michigan and one in Georgia. We also closed two banking centers, one in Michigan and one in
Indiana.
Home Lending Operation. Our home lending operation originates, acquires, securitizes and
sells residential mortgage loans on one-to-four family residences in order to generate
transactional income. The home lending operation also services mortgage loans on a fee basis for
others and occasionally sells mortgage servicing rights into the secondary market. Funding for our
home lending operation is provided primarily by deposits and borrowings obtained by our banking
operation.
Critical Accounting Policies
Various elements of our accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to
estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. In particular, we
have identified three policies that, due to the judgment, estimates and assumptions inherent in
those policies, are critical to an understanding of our consolidated financial statements. These
policies relate to: (a) fair value measurements; (b) the determination of our allowance for loan
losses; and (c) the determination of our secondary market reserve. We believe that the judgment,
estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are
appropriate given the factual circumstances at the time. However, given the sensitivity of our
consolidated financial statements to these critical accounting policies, the use of other
judgments, estimates and assumptions could result in material differences in our results of
operations or financial condition. For further information on our critical accounting policies,
please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is
available on our website, www.flagstar.com, under the Investor Relations section, or on the website
of the SEC, at www.sec.gov .
32
Selected Financial Ratios (Dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Return on average assets |
|
|
(1.83 |
)% |
|
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
(1.76 |
)% |
|
|
0.07 |
% |
Return on average equity |
|
|
(33.30 |
)% |
|
|
8.39 |
% |
|
|
(33.45 |
)% |
|
|
1.43 |
% |
Efficiency ratio |
|
|
88.3 |
% |
|
|
58.0 |
% |
|
|
80.2 |
% |
|
|
68.0 |
% |
Equity/assets ratio (average for the period) |
|
|
5.48 |
% |
|
|
4.91 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
|
4.66 |
% |
Mortgage loans originated or purchased |
|
$ |
9,286,970 |
|
|
$ |
8,059,886 |
|
|
$ |
18,786,714 |
|
|
$ |
15,919,874 |
|
Other loans originated or purchased |
|
$ |
8,962 |
|
|
$ |
116,771 |
|
|
$ |
28,989 |
|
|
$ |
266,754 |
|
Mortgage loans sold and securitized |
|
$ |
9,878,035 |
|
|
$ |
8,106,544 |
|
|
$ |
17,577,097 |
|
|
$ |
15,266,871 |
|
Interest rate spread bank only 1 |
|
|
1.45 |
% |
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
1.53 |
% |
|
|
1.67 |
% |
Net interest margin bank only 2 |
|
|
1.69 |
% |
|
|
1.89 |
% |
|
|
1.68 |
% |
|
|
1.77 |
% |
Interest rate spread consolidated 1 |
|
|
1.42 |
% |
|
|
1.77 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
1.62 |
% |
Net interest margin consolidated 2 |
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
1.80 |
% |
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
1.66 |
% |
Dividend payout ratio |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
239,425 |
|
|
|
66,005 |
|
|
|
164,235 |
|
|
|
63,159 |
|
Average fully diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
239,425 |
|
|
|
71,746 |
|
|
|
164,235 |
|
|
|
66,260 |
|
Charge-offs to average investment loans (annualized) |
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
4.18 |
% |
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
Equity-to-assets ratio |
|
|
5.57 |
% |
|
|
5.54 |
% |
|
|
3.33 |
% |
|
|
5.49 |
% |
Core capital ratio 3 |
|
|
7.19 |
% |
|
|
7.22 |
% |
|
|
4.95 |
% |
|
|
6.70 |
% |
Total risk-based capital ratio 3 |
|
|
13.67 |
% |
|
|
13.58 |
% |
|
|
9.10 |
% |
|
|
11.65 |
% |
Book value per common share |
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
4.03 |
(4) |
|
$ |
5.65 |
|
|
$ |
10.45 |
(5) |
Number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
468,530 |
|
|
|
90,379 |
|
|
|
83,627 |
|
|
|
72,337 |
|
Mortgage loans serviced for others |
|
$ |
61,531,058 |
|
|
$ |
58,856,128 |
|
|
$ |
55,870,207 |
|
|
$ |
45,830,865 |
|
Capitalized value of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
|
|
0.93 |
% |
|
|
1.47 |
% |
Ratio of allowance to non-performing loans |
|
|
50.4 |
% |
|
|
52.1 |
% |
|
|
52.1 |
% |
|
|
42.3 |
% |
Ratio of allowance to loans held for
investment |
|
|
5.63 |
% |
|
|
5.21 |
% |
|
|
4.14 |
% |
|
|
1.69 |
% |
Ratio of non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
6.64 |
% |
|
|
6.04 |
% |
|
|
5.97 |
% |
|
|
3.38 |
% |
Number of banking centers |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
Number of home lending centers |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Number of salaried employees |
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
3,285 |
|
|
|
3,246 |
|
|
|
3,389 |
|
Number of commissioned employees |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between the annualized average
yield earned on average interest-earning assets for the period and the annualized
average rate of interest paid on average interest-bearing liabilities for the period. |
|
2 |
|
Net interest margin is the annualized effect of the net interest income
divided by that periods average interest-earning assets. |
|
3 |
|
Based on adjusted total assets for purposes of tangible capital and core
capital, and risk-weighted assets for purposes of risk-based capital and total
risk based capital. These ratios are applicable to the Bank only. |
|
4 |
|
Does not reflect the 300,000 shares of Series B convertible participating voting preferred
stock that upon stockholder approval on May 26, 2009, converted to 375,000,000 shares of
common stock, the Treasury warrant to purchase 64.5 million shares of common stock, or the May
Investor warrant to purchase 14.3 million shares of common stock. |
|
5 |
|
The book value per common share assuming the conversion of our mandatory convertible
non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, Series A
at June 30, 2008 is $9.54. |
33
Results of Operations
Net Loss
Three Months. Net loss applicable to common stockholders for the three months ended June 30,
2009 was $(76.6) million, $(0.32) per share-diluted, a $92.3 million decrease from the earnings of
$15.7 million, $0.22 per share-diluted, reported in the comparable 2008 period. The overall
decrease resulted from a $78.1 million increase in non-interest expense and an $81.9 million
increase in provision for loan losses, offset by a $34.2 million increase in non-interest income, a
$39.7 million increase in federal income tax benefit and an increase of $4.9 million preferred
stock dividends/accretion.
Six Months. Net loss applicable to common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2009
was $(144.0) million, $(0.88) per share-diluted, a $149.1 million decrease from the earnings of
$5.1 million, $0.08 per share-diluted, reported in the comparable 2008 period. The overall
decrease resulted from a $171.6 million increase in non-interest expense and a $205.8 million
increase in provision for loan losses, offset by a $172.5 million increase in non-interest income,
a $63.0 million increase in federal income tax benefit and an increase of $7.8 million preferred
stock dividends/accretion.
Net Interest Income
Three Months. We recorded $60.0 million in net interest income before provision for loan
losses for the three months ended June 30, 2009, a 2.3% decrease from $61.4 million recorded for
the comparable 2008 period. The decrease reflects a $12.7 million decrease in interest income
offset by a $11.3 million decrease in interest expense, primarily as a result of rates paid on
deposits that decreased less than the decrease in yields earned on loans and mortgage-backed
securities. In addition, in the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period
in 2008, our average interest-earning assets increased by $1.2 billion and our average
interest-paying liabilities increased by $0.5 billion. Additionally, our interest income has been
adversely affected by a significant increase in loans in which interest accruals have been
discontinued. See Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1.
Financial Statements herein.
Average interest-earning assets as a whole repriced down 82 basis points during the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and average interest-bearing liabilities repriced down 47 basis points
during the same period, resulting in the decrease in our interest rate spread of 35 basis points to
1.42% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, from 1.77% for the comparable 2008 period. The
Company recorded a net interest margin of 1.61% at June 30, 2009 as compared to 1.80% at June 30,
2008. At the Bank level, the net interest margin was 1.69% at June 30, 2009, as compared to 1.89%
at June 30, 2008.
Six Months. We recorded $116.7 million in net interest income before provision for loan
losses for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a 0.5% increase from $116.2 million recorded for the
comparable 2008 period. The increase reflects a $38.6 million decrease in interest income offset
by a $39.1 million decrease in interest expense, primarily as a result of rates paid on deposits
that decreased more than the decrease in yields earned on loans and mortgage-backed securities. In
addition, in the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008, our
average interest-earning assets increased by $0.5 billion and our average interest-paying
liabilities increased by $0.2 billion. Additionally, our interest income has been adversely
affected by a significant increase in loans in which interest accruals have been discontinued. See
Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1. Financial Statements
herein.
34
Average Yields Earned and Rates Paid. The following table presents interest income from
average interest-earning assets, expressed in dollars and yields, and interest expense on average
interest-bearing liabilities, expressed in dollars and rates at the Company rather than the Bank.
Interest income from earning assets includes the amortization of net premiums and net deferred loan
origination costs of $1.8 million and $3.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. Interest income from earning assets includes the amortization of net premiums
and net deferred loan origination costs of $3.5 million and $6.7 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Non-accruing loans were included in the average loan amounts
outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yield/Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yield/Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans available for sale |
|
$ |
3,533,219 |
|
|
$ |
45,245 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
% |
|
$ |
3,009,450 |
|
|
$ |
51,702 |
|
|
|
6.87 |
% |
Loans held for investment |
|
|
8,681,923 |
|
|
|
111,516 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
% |
|
|
8,948,480 |
|
|
|
125,880 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
% |
Securities classified as available for
sale
or trading |
|
|
2,402,234 |
|
|
|
30,659 |
|
|
|
5.11 |
% |
|
|
1,479,799 |
|
|
|
21,171 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
233,324 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
% |
|
|
210,346 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
% |
Other |
|
|
37,780 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
28,941 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
14,888,480 |
|
|
|
187,848 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
% |
|
|
13,677,016 |
|
|
|
200,564 |
|
|
|
5.87 |
% |
Other assets |
|
|
1,885,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,614,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
16,773,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,291,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
8,390,676 |
|
|
|
66,547 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
% |
|
$ |
7,207,022 |
|
|
|
70,817 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
% |
FHLB advances |
|
|
5,359,076 |
|
|
|
57,284 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
% |
|
|
6,035,978 |
|
|
|
63,327 |
|
|
|
4.22 |
% |
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
108,000 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
% |
|
|
114,527 |
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
% |
Other |
|
|
249,226 |
|
|
|
2,834 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
% |
|
|
248,685 |
|
|
|
3,814 |
|
|
|
6.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
14,106,978 |
|
|
|
127,831 |
|
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
13,606,212 |
|
|
|
139,165 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
% |
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,746,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
934,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
920,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
16,773,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,291,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
781,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
70,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
60,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
61,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of average interest-earning assets
to average interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between the annualized average
yield earned on average interest-earning assets for the period and the
annualized average rate of interest paid on average interest-bearing liabilities for the period. |
|
2 |
|
Net interest margin is the annualized effect of the net interest income divided by that
periods average interest-earning assets. |
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yield/Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yield/Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans available for sale |
|
$ |
3,194,965 |
|
|
$ |
81,443 |
|
|
|
5.10 |
% |
|
$ |
3,047,017 |
|
|
$ |
101,488 |
|
|
|
6.66 |
% |
Loans held for investment |
|
|
8,885,113 |
|
|
|
233,940 |
|
|
|
5.28 |
% |
|
|
8,764,193 |
|
|
|
252,388 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities held to
maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
602,452 |
|
|
|
15,576 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
% |
Securities classified as available for
sale
or trading |
|
|
2,113,762 |
|
|
|
56,136 |
|
|
|
5.33 |
% |
|
|
1,289,102 |
|
|
|
36,761 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
% |
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
229,652 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
252,258 |
|
|
|
4,145 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
% |
Other |
|
|
36,602 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
28,138 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
7.57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
14,460,094 |
|
|
|
372,826 |
|
|
|
5.17 |
% |
|
|
13,983,160 |
|
|
|
411,417 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
% |
Other assets |
|
|
1,942,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,493,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
16,402,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,476,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
8,391,564 |
|
|
|
133,897 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
% |
|
$ |
7,346,428 |
|
|
|
154,867 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
% |
FHLB advances |
|
|
5,315,056 |
|
|
|
114,093 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
% |
|
|
6,022,220 |
|
|
|
127,885 |
|
|
|
4.27 |
% |
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
108,000 |
|
|
|
2,319 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
% |
|
|
223,732 |
|
|
|
4,362 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
% |
Other |
|
|
248,945 |
|
|
|
5,770 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
% |
|
|
248,685 |
|
|
|
8,106 |
|
|
|
6.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
14,063,565 |
|
|
|
256,079 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
|
13,841,065 |
|
|
|
295,220 |
|
|
|
4.26 |
% |
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,478,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
915,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
861,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
16,402,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,476,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
396,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
142,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
116,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
116,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of average interest-earning assets
to average interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between the annualized average
yield earned on average interest-earning assets for the period and the
annualized average rate of interest paid on average interest-bearing liabilities for the period. |
|
2 |
|
Net interest margin is the annualized effect of the net interest income divided
by that periods average interest-earning assets. |
36
Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in
interest income and interest expense for the components of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, which are presented in the preceding table. The table below
distinguishes between the changes related to average outstanding balances (changes in volume while
holding the initial average rate constant) and the changes related to average interest rates
(changes in average rates while holding the initial average balance constant). Changes
attributable to both a change in volume and a change in rates are included as changes in rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 Versus 2008 |
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) due to: |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans available for sale |
|
$ |
(15,454 |
) |
|
$ |
8,996 |
|
|
$ |
(6,458 |
) |
Loans held for investment |
|
|
(10,611 |
) |
|
|
(3,752 |
) |
|
|
(14,363 |
) |
Securities classified as available for sale or trading |
|
|
(3,772 |
) |
|
|
13,260 |
|
|
|
9,488 |
|
Interest-earning deposits |
|
|
(1,101 |
) |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
(950 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(566 |
) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(31,504 |
) |
|
|
18,788 |
|
|
|
(12,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
(15,965 |
) |
|
|
11,695 |
|
|
|
(4,270 |
) |
FHLB advances |
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
(7,147 |
) |
|
|
(6,043 |
) |
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(988 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(15,821 |
) |
|
|
4,487 |
|
|
|
(11,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income |
|
$ |
(15,683 |
) |
|
$ |
14,301 |
|
|
$ |
(1,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 Versus 2008 |
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) due to: |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans available for sale |
|
$ |
(24,972 |
) |
|
$ |
4,927 |
|
|
$ |
(20,045 |
) |
Loans held for investment |
|
|
(21,931 |
) |
|
|
3,483 |
|
|
|
(18,448 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities-held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,576 |
) |
|
|
(15,576 |
) |
Securities classified as available for sale or trading |
|
|
(4,252 |
) |
|
|
23,627 |
|
|
|
19,375 |
|
Interest-earning deposits |
|
|
(2,489 |
) |
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
(2,862 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1,355 |
) |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(54,999 |
) |
|
|
16,408 |
|
|
|
(38,591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
(43,123 |
) |
|
|
22,153 |
|
|
|
(20,970 |
) |
FHLB advances |
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
|
(15,106 |
) |
|
|
(13,792 |
) |
Security repurchase agreements |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
(2,269 |
) |
|
|
(2,043 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(2,344 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(2,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(43,927 |
) |
|
|
4,786 |
|
|
|
(39,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income |
|
$ |
(11,072 |
) |
|
$ |
11,622 |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Provision for Loan Losses
Three Months. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a provision for loan
losses of $125.7 million as compared to $43.8 million recorded during the same period in 2008. The
provisions reflect our estimates to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level management
believes is appropriate to cover probable losses inherent in the portfolio and had the effect of
increasing our allowance for loan losses by $8.0 million. Net charge-offs increased in the 2009
period to $117.7 million, compared to $11.2 million for the same period in 2008, and as a
percentage of investment loans, increased to an annualized 5.42% from 0.50%. See Analysis of
Items on Statement of Financial Condition Assets Allowance for Loan Losses, below, for
further information.
Six Months. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a provision for loan
losses of $283.9 million as compared to $78.1 million recorded during the same period in 2008. The
provisions reflect our estimates to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level management
believes is appropriate to cover probable losses inherent in the portfolio and had the effect of
increasing our allowance for loan losses by $98.0 million. Net charge-offs increased in the 2009
period to $185.9 million, compared to $28.1 million for the same period in 2008, and as a
percentage of investment loans, increased to an annualized 4.18% from 0.64%. See Analysis of
Items on Statement of Financial Condition Assets Allowance for Loan Losses, below, for
further information.
Non-Interest Income
Our non-interest income consists of (i) loan fees and charges, (ii) deposit fees and charges,
(iii) loan administration, (iv) net gain on loan sales, (v) net loss on sales of MSRs, (vi) net
gain on securities available for sale, (vii) net impairment losses recognized in earnings, (viii)
net loss on trading securities and (viii) other fees and charges. During the three months ended
June 30, 2009, non-interest income increased to $134.5 million from $100.3 million in the
comparable 2008 period. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, non-interest income increased
to $325.5 million from $152.9 million in the comparable 2008 period.
Loan Fees and Charges. Both our home lending operation and banking operation earn loan
origination fees and collect other charges in connection with originating residential mortgages and
other types of loans.
Three Months. Loan fees recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $35.0
million compared to $0.6 million collected during the comparable 2008 period. During the three
month period ending June 30, 2009, we recorded gross loan fees and charges of $35.1 million, an
increase of $8.6 million from the $26.5 million recorded in 2008.
The increases in loan fees and charges resulted principally from our decision to account for
the majority of our loans held for sale at fair value. As such, we no longer defer loan fees or
expenses related to such loans. Prior to December 31, 2008, we recorded fee income net of any fees
deferred for the purposes of complying with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 91,
Accounting for Non-Refundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and
Initial Direct Costs of Leases (SFAS 91). In accordance with SFAS 91, loan origination fees are
capitalized and added as an adjustment to the basis of the individual loans originated. These fees
are accreted into income as an adjustment to the loan yield over the life of the loan or when the
loan is sold. During the three month ended June 30, 2009, we deferred $40,000 of fee revenue in
accordance with SFAS 91 for loans not accounted for under fair value, compared to $25.9 million in
2008.
Six Months. Loan fees recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $67.9
million compared to $1.5 million collected during the comparable 2008 period. During the six month
period ending June 30, 2009, we recorded gross loan fees and charges of $68.0 million, an increase
of $16.0 million from the $52.0 million recorded in 2008.
Deposit Fees and Charges. Our banking operation collects deposit fees and other charges such
as fees for non-sufficient funds transactions, cashier check fees, ATM fees, overdraft protection,
and other account fees for services we provide to our banking customers.
Three months. During the three months ended June 30, 2009 we recorded $8.0 million in deposit
fees versus $6.8 million in the comparable 2008 period. This increase is attributable to the
increase in our deposit base.
Six months. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 we recorded $15.2 million in deposit
fees versus $12.8 million in the comparable 2008 period. This increase is attributable to the
increase in our deposit base.
Loan Administration. When our home lending operation sells mortgage loans in the secondary
market it usually retains the right to continue to service these loans and earn a servicing fee.
The majority of our MSRs are accounted for on the fair value method. See Note 11 of the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1. Financial Statements herein.
38
The following table summarizes net loan administration loss (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Servicing income (loss) on consumer mortgage servicing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing fees, ancillary income and charges |
|
$ |
1,424 |
|
|
$ |
1,705 |
|
|
$ |
2,940 |
|
|
$ |
3,484 |
|
Amortization expense consumer |
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
|
(704 |
) |
|
|
(1,370 |
) |
|
|
(1,316 |
) |
Impairment (loss) recovery consumer |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(2,016 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loan administration income (loss) -
consumer |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
2,223 |
|
Servicing income (loss) on residential mortgage servicing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing fees, ancillary income and charges |
|
|
39,241 |
|
|
|
33,536 |
|
|
|
77,693 |
|
|
|
62,165 |
|
Changes to fair value |
|
|
62,744 |
|
|
|
72,192 |
|
|
|
(13,887 |
) |
|
|
(12,102 |
) |
Loss on hedging activity |
|
|
(60,368 |
) |
|
|
(69,294 |
) |
|
|
(53,307 |
) |
|
|
(56,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loan administration income residential |
|
|
41,617 |
|
|
|
36,434 |
|
|
|
10,499 |
|
|
|
18,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan administration income |
|
$ |
41,853 |
|
|
$ |
37,370 |
|
|
$ |
10,053 |
|
|
$ |
20,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months. Loan administration increased to $41.9 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 from $37.4 million for the same period in 2008. Servicing fees, ancillary income,
and charges on our residential mortgage servicing increased during the three month period ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same period ended June 30, 2008, primarily as a result of our
increased loans serviced for others. The fair value changes and the loss on hedging activities
were due to the rising rate environment in the three month period ended June 30, 2009. The total
unpaid principal balance of loans serviced for others was $61.5 billion at June 30, 2009, versus
$45.8 billion at June 30, 2008.
The loan administration income of $41.9 million does not include $39.1 of losses in mortgage
backed securities that were held on our consolidated statements of financial condition as economic
hedges of our MSR asset during the three month period ending June 30, 2009. These losses were
recorded as losses on trading securities within our consolidated statement of operations, as
appropriate.
For the consumer mortgage servicing, the decrease in the servicing fees, ancillary income and
charges for the three month period ended June 30, 2009 versus the same period ended in 2008 was due
to the decrease in consumer loans serviced for others. At June 30, 2009, the total unpaid
principal balance of consumer loans serviced for others was $1.1 billion versus $1.3 billion
serviced at June 30, 2008. The increase in impairment of $0.5 million was primarily the result of
increased delinquency assumptions.
Six months. Loan administration income decreased to $10.1 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 from $20.3 million for the same period in 2008. Servicing fees, ancillary income,
and charges on our residential mortgage servicing increased during the six month period ended June
30, 2009 compared to the same period ended June 30, 2008, primarily as a result of our increase in
loans serviced for others. The fair value changes and the loss on hedging activities were
principally due to changes in interest rates in the six month period ended June 30, 2009. The
total unpaid principal balance of loans serviced for others was $61.5 billion at June 30, 2009,
versus $45.8 billion at June 30, 2008.
The loan administration income of $10.1 million does not include $15.3 million of losses in
mortgage backed securities that were held on our consolidated statement of financial condition as
economic hedges of our MSR asset during the six month period ending June 30, 2009. These losses
were recorded in loss on trading securities within our consolidated statement of operations, as
appropriate
For the consumer mortgage servicing , the decrease in the servicing fees, ancillary income and
charges for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 versus the same period ended in 2008 was due
to the decrease in consumer loans serviced for others. At June 30, 2009, the total unpaid
principal balance of consumer loans serviced for others was $1.1 billion versus $1.3 billion
serviced at June 30, 2008. The increase in impairment of $2.0 million was the result of increased
delinquency assumptions.
Net Gain on Loan Sales. Our home lending operation records the transaction fee income it
generates from the origination, securitization and sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market.
The amount of net gain on loan sales recognized is a function of the volume of mortgage loans
originated for sale and the fair value of these loans, net of related selling expenses. Net gain
on loan sales is increased or decreased by any mark to market pricing adjustments on loan
commitments and forward sales commitments in accordance with SFAS 133, increases to the secondary
market reserve related to loans sold during the period, and related administrative expenses. The
volatility in the gain on sale spread is attributable to market pricing, which changes with demand
and the general level of interest rates. Generally, we are able to sell loans into the
39
secondary market at a higher margin during periods of low or decreasing interest rates.
Typically, as the volume of acquirable loans increases in a lower or falling interest rate
environment, we are able to pay less to acquire loans and are then able to achieve higher spreads
on the eventual sale of the acquired loans. In contrast, when interest rates rise, the volume of
acquirable loans decreases and therefore we may need to pay more in the acquisition phase, thus
decreasing our net gain achievable. During 2008 and into 2009, our net gain was also affected by
increasing spreads available from securities we sell that are guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac and by a combination of a significant decline in residential mortgage lenders and a significant
shift in loan demand to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conforming residential mortgage loans and Ginnie
Mae insured loans, which have provided us with more favorable loan pricing opportunities for
conventional residential mortgage products.
The following table indicates the net gain on loan sales reported in our consolidated
financial statements to our loans sold or securitized within the period (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net gain on loan sales |
|
$ |
104,664 |
|
|
$ |
43,826 |
|
|
$ |
300,358 |
|
|
$ |
107,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans sold or securitized |
|
$ |
9,878,035 |
|
|
$ |
8,106,544 |
|
|
$ |
17,577,097 |
|
|
$ |
15,266,871 |
|
Spread achieved |
|
|
1.06 |
% |
|
|
0.54 |
% |
|
|
1.71 |
% |
|
|
0.70 |
% |
Three months. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, there was a net gain on loan
sales of $104.7 million, as compared to a $43.8 million gain in the 2008 period, an increase of
$60.9 million. The 2009 period reflects the sale of $9.9 billion in loans versus $8.1 billion sold
in the 2008 period. Management believes changes in market conditions, including favorable consumer
mortgage rates for both purchase and refinance and fewer competitors, during the 2009 period
resulted in an increased mortgage loan origination volume ($9.3 billion in the 2009 period vs. $8.1
billion in the 2008 period) and an increased overall gain on sale spread (106 basis points in the
2009 period versus 54 basis points in the 2008 period).
Our calculation of net gain on loan sales reflects our adoption of fair value accounting for
the majority of our mortgage loans available for sale beginning January 1, 2009. The effect of the
adoption of fair value on the current quarters operations amounted to $20.3 million. This amount
represents the recording of the mortgage loans available for sale that remained on our statement of
financial condition at June 30, 2009 at their estimated fair value. The change of method was made
on a prospective basis; therefore, only mortgage loans available for sale that were originated
during 2009 have been affected. In addition, we also had changes in amounts related to SFAS 133,
lower of cost or market adjustments on loans transferred to held for investment and provisions to
our secondary market reserve. Changes in amounts related to SFAS 133 amounted to $8.6 million and
$6.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Lower of cost or
market adjustments amounted to $0.2 million and $22.5 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Provisions to our secondary market reserve amounted to $7.1 million
and $2.8 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Also included
in our net gain on loan sales is the capitalized value of our MSRs, which totaled $109.0 million
and $108.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Six months. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net gain on loan sales increased $193.1
million to $300.4 million from the $107.3 million in the 2008 period. The 2009 period reflects the
sale of $17.6 billion in loans versus $15.3 billion sold in the 2008 period. Management believes
changes in market conditions, including favorable consumer mortgage rates for both purchase and
refinance and fewer competitors, during the 2009 period resulted in an increased mortgage loan
origination volume ($18.8 billion in the 2009 period versus $15.9 billion in the 2008 period) and a
higher overall gain on sale spread (171 basis points in the 2009 versus 70 basis points in the 2008
period).
Our calculation of net gain on loan sales reflects our adoption of fair value accounting for
the majority of our mortgage loans available for sale beginning January 1, 2009. The effect of our
adoption on the current quarters operations amounted to $42.3 million. This amount represents the
recording of the mortgage loans available for sale that remained on our statement of financial
condition at June 30, 2009 at their estimated fair value. The change of method was made on a
prospective basis; therefore, only mortgage loans available for sale that were originated during
2009 have been affected. In addition, we also had changes in amounts related to SFAS 133, lower of
cost or market adjustments on loans transferred to held for investment and provisions to our
secondary market reserve. Changes in amounts related to SFAS 133 amounted to $15.3 million and
$26.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Lower of cost or
market adjustments amounted to $0.4 million and $22.7 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Provisions to our secondary market reserve amounted to $10.9 million
and $5.8 million, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Also included in
our net gain on loan sales is the capitalized value of our MSRs, which totaled $191.3 million and
$203.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
40
Net Gain on Sales of Mortgage Servicing Rights. As part of our business model, our home
lending operation occasionally sells MSRs in transactions separate from the sale of the underlying
loans. At the time of the MSR sale, we record a gain or loss based on the selling price of the
MSRs less our carrying value and transaction costs. Because we carry most of our MSRs at fair
value, we would not expect to realize significant gains or losses at the time of the sale.
Instead, our income or loss on changes in the valuation of MSRs would be recorded through our loan
administration income.
Three months. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, the loss on sales of MSRs increased
to $2.5 million from the $0.8 million loss recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
During the three month period ending June 30, 2009, we sold servicing rights related to $2.3
billion of loans serviced for others on a bulk basis and no servicing rights on a bulk basis were
sold during the comparable 2008 period. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized a
loss of $2.6 million on servicing rights sold and a gain of $0.1 million on our change in the
estimate of amounts receivable from past MSR sales. The $0.8 million loss on MSR sales for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 resulted from our change in estimate of amounts receivable from
past MSR sales.
Six months. During the six month period ending June 30, 2009, the loss on sales of MSRs
increased to $2.6 million from the $0.5 million loss recorded for the six months ended June 30,
2008. During the six month period ending June 30, 2009, we sold servicing rights related to $2.3
billion of loans serviced for others on a bulk basis and no servicing rights were sold on a bulk
basis for the comparable 2008 period. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized a loss
of $2.6 million of servicing rights sold. The $0.5 million loss on MSR sales for the six months
ended June 30, 2008, resulted from our change in estimate of amounts receivable from past MSR
sales.
Net Gain on Securities Available for Sale. Securities classified as available for sale are
comprised of U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities and CMOs.
Three Months. Gains on the sale of U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed
securities available for sale that are recently created with underlying mortgage products
originated by the Bank are reported within net gain on loan sale. Securities in this category have
typically remained in the portfolio less than 90 days before sale. During the three months ended
June 30, 2009, sales of these agency securities with underlying mortgage products originated by the
Bank were $45.2 million resulting in $0.8 million of net gain on loan sale versus $1.2 billion
resulting in $4.5 million of net gain on loan sale during the same period in 2008.
Gain on sales for all other available for sale securities types are reported in net gain on
sale of available for sales securities. There were no such sales in the three months ended June
30, 2009 versus a $4.9 million gain on $0.9 billion sold during the same period in 2008.
Six Months. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, sales of agency securities with
underlying mortgage products originated by the Bank were $462.5 million resulting in $12.0 million
of net gain on loan sale compared with a $1.7 million gain on $2.7 billion during the six months
ended June 30, 2008.
Gain on sales for all other available for sale securities types are reported in net gain on
sale of available for sales securities. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we sold no such
securities. In the six months ended June 30, 2009, we sold $895.0 million in purchased agency and
non-agency securities available for sale. This sale generated a net gain on sale of available for
sale securities of $4.9 million.
Loss on Trading Securities. Securities classified as trading are comprised of U.S. government
sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, U.S. treasury bonds and residual interests from
private-label securitizations. U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities held in
trading are distinguished from available-for-sale based upon the intent of management to use them
as an economic hedge against changes in the valuation of the MSR portfolio; however, these do not
qualify as an accounting hedge as defined in current accounting guidance for derivatives and
hedges. Gain (loss) on securities classified as trading is the result of a change in the estimated
fair value of the securities or actual gain (loss) on sale of a trading security. Loss on residual
interests classified as trading is a result of a reduction in the estimated fair value of the
securities with the related loss recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.
Three Months. During the second quarter of 2009, we recorded a loss on trading securities of
$42.5 million versus a loss of $4.1 million for the same period in 2008.
We recognized a loss of $3.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 versus a loss of
$4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 related to residual interests from our
private securitizations. The losses in 2009 and 2008 are primarily due to continued increases in
expected credit losses underlying the securitizations.
We recorded a loss of $39.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, all of which was
unrealized, on agency mortgage backed securities held at June 30, 2009.
41
Six Months. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a $31.3 million loss on
trading securities. The loss was primarily due to changes in the value of trading agency mortgage
backed securities held at June 30, 2009 and additional losses on residual interests from our
private securitizations.
We recognized a loss of $15.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 versus a loss of
$13.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 related to our private securitizations. The
losses in 2009 and 2008 are primarily due to continued increases in expected credit losses
underlying the securitizations.
We recorded a loss of $15.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, which included an
unrealized loss of $39.1 million related to agency mortgage backed securities held at June 30,
2009.
Net impairment losses recognized through earnings. We may also incur losses on securities available for sale as a result of a
reduction in the estimated fair value of the security when that decline has been deemed to be an
other-than-temporary impairment. Prior to the first quarter of 2009, if an other-than-temporary
impairment was identified, the difference between the amortized cost and the market value was
recorded as a loss through operations. Beginning the first quarter of 2009, accounting guidance
changed to only recognize other-than- temporary impairments due to credit losses through operations
with any remainder recognized through other comprehensive income. Further, upon adoption, the
guidance required a cumulative adjustment increasing retained earnings and other comprehensive loss
by the non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment, related to securities available for
sale, that we had recorded prior to January 1, 2009. See accumulated other comprehensive loss in
Note 13, Stockholders Equity.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we recognized an other-than-temporary impairment of
$62.4 million on three collateralized mortgage obligations. As required by changes in accounting
guidance for investments, the credit loss portion of the other-than-temporary impairment was
$11.8 million while the impairment related to all other factors was $50.6 million. Effective
January 1, 2009, the $50.6 million loss, net of $17.7 million of tax benefit, was reclassified from
retained earnings to other comprehensive loss as a cumulative adjustment.
In the three months ended June 30, 2009, additional credit losses on CMOs with previously
recognized credit losses totaled $0.3 million, which was recognized in current operations. At June
30, 2009, other-than-temporary impairment credit losses totaled $32.1 million.
In the six months ended June 30, 2009, additional credit losses on CMOs totaled $17.6 million,
which was recognized in current operations.
Other Fees and Charges. Other fees and charges include certain miscellaneous fees, including
dividends received on FHLB stock and income generated by our subsidiaries.
Three months. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded $2.1 million in cash
dividends received on FHLB stock, compared to $5.3 million received during the three months ended
June 30, 2008. At both June 30, 2009 and 2008, we owned $373.4 million of FHLB stock. We also
recorded $2.6 million and $1.9 million in subsidiary income for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. In addition, we recorded expense of $16.9 million and income of $0.2
million related to adjustments to our estimates in determining our secondary market reserve, for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Six months. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded $1.3 million in cash
dividends received on FHLB stock, compared to the $9.7 million received during the six months ended
June 30, 2008. We also recorded $5.1 million and $3.4 million in subsidiary income for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In addition, we recorded expense of $27.7
million and an income of $1.6 million relating to adjustments to our estimates in determining our
secondary market reserve, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Non-Interest Expense
The following table sets forth the components of our non-interest expense, along with the
allocation of expenses related to loan originations that are deferred pursuant to SFAS 91. As
required by SFAS 91, mortgage loan fees and direct origination costs (principally compensation and
benefits) are capitalized as an adjustment to the basis of the loans originated during the period
and amortized to expense over the lives of the respective loans rather than immediately expensed.
Other expenses associated with loan production, however, are not required or allowed to be
capitalized and are, therefore, expensed when incurred. Effective January 1, 2009, we elected to
account for substantially all of our mortgage loans available for sale using the fair value method
and, therefore, no longer apply SFAS 91 to those loans (dollars in thousands).
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
56,584 |
|
|
$ |
54,411 |
|
|
$ |
115,238 |
|
|
$ |
111,037 |
|
Commissions |
|
|
15,302 |
|
|
|
30,788 |
|
|
|
48,717 |
|
|
|
60,103 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
17,499 |
|
|
|
20,471 |
|
|
|
36,378 |
|
|
|
40,324 |
|
Advertising |
|
|
3,254 |
|
|
|
2,332 |
|
|
|
5,748 |
|
|
|
4,657 |
|
Federal insurance premium |
|
|
16,612 |
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
20,848 |
|
|
|
3,345 |
|
Communications |
|
|
1,630 |
|
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
|
3,355 |
|
|
|
4,243 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
Asset resolution |
|
|
17,977 |
|
|
|
8,039 |
|
|
|
42,850 |
|
|
|
11,780 |
|
Other |
|
|
42,112 |
|
|
|
6,840 |
|
|
|
79,781 |
|
|
|
11,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
172,068 |
|
|
|
127,219 |
|
|
|
355,020 |
|
|
|
248,691 |
|
Less: capitalized direct costs of loan closings,
under SFAS 91 |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(33,483 |
) |
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
|
(65,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense |
|
$ |
171,818 |
|
|
$ |
93,736 |
|
|
$ |
354,487 |
|
|
$ |
182,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio (1) |
|
|
88.3 |
% |
|
|
58.0 |
% |
|
|
80.2 |
% |
|
|
68.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating and administrative expenses divided by the sum of net interest income
and non-interest income. |
Three months. Non-interest expense, before the capitalization of loan origination costs,
increased $44.9 million to $172.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009, from $127.2
million for the comparable 2008 period. The following are the major changes affecting non-interest
expense as reflected in the consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
The banking operation conducted business from five more facilities at June 30, 2009
than at June 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
The home lending operation originated $9.3 billion in residential mortgage loans
during the 2009 quarter versus $8.1 billion in the comparable 2008 quarter. |
|
|
|
|
We employed 3,290 salaried employees at June 30, 2009 versus 3,389 salaried
employees at June 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
We employed 176 full-time national account executives at June 30, 2009 versus 229 at
June 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
We employed 281 full-time retail loan originators located at 45 home lending
centers at June 30, 2009 versus 562 in 121 home lending centers at June 30, 2008. |
Compensation and benefits expense increased $2.2 million during the 2009 period from the
comparable 2008 period to $56.6 million, with the increase primarily attributable to additional
loan servicing employees in our collection and loss mitigation areas.
The change in commissions paid to the commissioned sales staff, on a period over period basis,
was a $15.5 million decrease. This decrease reflects the decreased employment of full-time retail
loan originators as compared to the same 2008 period and a change in the commission structure.
Occupancy and equipment decreased $3.0 million during the 2009 period to $17.5 million from
$20.5 million recorded in the 2008 period as the result of the decrease in home lending centers to
45 in the 2009 period from 121 in the 2008 period.
The increase in FDIC premium of $14.8 million for the second quarter of 2009 as compared to
the second quarter 2008 reflected a special FDIC premium imposed on all banks which totaled $7.8
million for the Bank. The remaining increase was the result of increased rates on regular premiums
and an increase in deposits of $1.2 billion.
Asset resolution expense consists of foreclosure costs and loss provisions and gains and
losses on the sale of real estate owned (REO) properties that we have obtained through
foreclosure proceedings. Asset resolution expense increased $9.9 million to $18.0 million during
the 2009 period from the comparable 2008 period. Because of the climate in the housing market,
write downs of REO properties increased from $3.7 million to $7.4 million, an increase of $3.7
million net of any gain on REO sales and recovery of related amounts.
43
Other expenses totaled $42.1 million during 2009 compared to $6.8 million in 2008. The 519.1%
increase was primarily due to a $13.0 million increase in the value of warrants issued in January
2009, and a $10.4 million increase in loss reserves related to our reinsurance company.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we capitalized direct loan origination costs of
$0.3 million, a decrease of $33.2 million from $33.5 million for the comparable 2008 period. This
99.1% decrease is a result of our adoption of fair value accounting for the majority of our loans
held for sale that were originated during 2009.
Six months. Non-interest expense, before the capitalization of loan origination costs,
increased $106.3 million to $355.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, from $248.7
million for the comparable 2008 period.
Compensation and benefits expense increased $4.2 million during the 2009 period from the
comparable 2008 period to $115.2 million, with the increase primarily attributable to additional
loan workout specialists and loan servicing employees offset in part by a decrease in home lending
support staff.
The decrease in commission expense, which is paid to the commissioned sales staff, of $11.4
million, on a period over period basis is the result of a decrease in the number of full-time
retail loan originators as compared to the comparable 2008 period and a change in the commission
structure.
The increase in FDIC premium of $17.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the same period 2008 reflected a special FDIC premium imposed on all banks which
totaled $7.8 million for the Bank. The remaining increase was the result of increased rates on
regular premiums and an increase in deposits of $2.0 billion.
Asset resolution expense consists of foreclosure costs and loss provisions and gains and
losses on the sale of REO properties that we have obtained through foreclosure proceedings. Asset
resolution expense increased $31.1 million to $42.9 million during the 2009 period from the
comparable 2008 period. Write downs of REO properties, net of any gains on REO sales and recovery
of related amounts, increased $21.9 million from $6.2 million in the 2008 period to $28.1 million.
Foreclosure expenses increased $14.2 million to $23.0 million for the 2009 period from $ $8.8
million in the 2008 period. These increases were offset in part by $4.4 million in net recoveries
recorded on FHA insured assets recorded in the 2009 period and none in the 2008 period.
Other expenses totaled $79.8 million during 2009 compared to $11.9 million in 2008. The $67.9
million , or 570.6% increase was primarily due to a $24.0 million increase in the value of warrants
issued in January 2009 and a $21.0 million increase in loss reserves related to our reinsurance
company.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we capitalized direct loan origination costs of
$0.5 million, a decrease of $65.3 million from $65.8 million for the comparable 2008 period. This
99.2% decrease is a result of our adoption of fair value accounting for the majority of our loans
held for sale that were originated during 2009.
Provision for Federal Income Taxes
Three months. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, our benefit for federal income taxes
as a percentage of pretax loss was (30.4)% compared to 34.7% of pretax earnings in 2008. For each
period, the provision varies from statutory rates primarily because of certain non-deductive
corporate expenses. Additionally, the 2009 period was affected by non-deductible warrant expense
of $13.0 million.
Six months. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, our (benefit) provision for federal
income taxes as a percentage of pretax loss was (30.6)% compared to 36.8% of pretax earnings in
2008. For each period, the provision for federal income taxes varies from statutory rates
primarily because of certain non-deductible corporate expenses. Additionally, the 2009 period was
affected by non-deductible warrant expense of $24.1 million.
Analysis of Items on Statement of Financial Condition
Assets
Securities Classified as Trading. Securities classified as trading are comprised of U.S.
government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, U.S. treasury bonds and residual interests
from private-label securitizations. U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities
held in trading are distinguished from available-for-sale based upon the intent of management to
use them for liquidity purposes and as an economic hedge against changes in the valuation of the
MSR portfolio, however, these do not qualify as an accounting hedge as defined in current
accounting guidance for derivatives and hedges. See Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements herein.
44
At June 30, 2009 the balance was $1.6 billion compared to $0.5 billion at December 31, 2008.
The balance has increased as part of our overall liquidity and MSR portfolio requirements.
Securities Classified as Available for Sale. Securities classified as available for sale,
which are comprised of U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities and CMOs
decreased from $1.1 billion at December 31, 2008, to $0.7 billion at June 30, 2009. See Note 6 of
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements herein.
Other Investments-Restricted. Our investment portfolio increased from $34.5 million at
December 31, 2008, to $39.3 million at June 30, 2009. Investment securities consist of investments
in mutual funds made by our insurance subsidiary.
Loans Available for Sale. We sell a majority of the mortgage loans we produce into the
secondary market on a whole loan basis or by securitizing the loans into mortgage-backed
securities. At June 30, 2009, we held loans available for sale of $3.0 billion, which was an
increase of $1.5 billion from $1.5 billion held at December 31, 2008. Our loan production is
typically inversely related to the level of long-term interest rates. As long-term rates decrease,
we tend to originate an increasing number of mortgage loans. A significant amount of the loan
origination activity during periods of falling interest rates is derived from refinancing of
existing mortgage loans. Conversely, during periods of increasing long-term rate increases, loan
originations tend to decrease. Beginning January 1, 2009, we elected to record the majority of
loans available for sale on the fair value method and will not defer loan fees and expenses related
to those loans. At June 30, 2009, all but approximately $35.5 million of our loans available for
sale were recorded on a fair value basis. See Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements herein.
Loans Held for Investment. Loans held for investment at June 30, 2009 decreased $664.3
million from December 31, 2008. The decrease was principally attributable to a decrease in first
mortgage loans. See Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial
Statements, herein.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of
probable and inherent losses in our loans held for investment portfolio as of the date of the
consolidated financial statements. The allowance provides for probable losses that have been
identified with specific customer relationships and for probable losses believed to be inherent in
the loan portfolio but that have not been specifically identified.
The allowance for loan losses increased to $474.0 million at June 30, 2009 from $376.0 million
at December 31, 2008, respectively. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of
non-performing loans decreased to 50.4% from 52.1% at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. Our non-performing loans (i.e., loans that are past due 90 days or more and/or on
nonaccrual) increased to $940.8 million at June 30, 2009 from $722.3 million at December 31, 2008.
The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of investment loans increased to 5.63% at June 30,
2009 from 4.14% at December 31, 2008. The increase in the allowance for loan losses at June 30,
2009 reflects managements assessment of the effect of increased levels of charge-offs within the
higher risk loan categories, (i.e. commercial real estate, HELOCs, second mortgages and other
consumer loans). The delinquency rate increased in the six months to 14.18% as of June 30, 2009,
up from 10.78% as of December 31, 2008.
However, the rate of increase in delinquencies began to moderate during the year, as reflected
in the decline in transition rates (i.e., the rate at which a loan will move from a current status
to a delinquent status or from one delinquent status to the next)
from January, 2009 to June,2009, during which time such rates declined
from 2.3% to 2.0%, respectively, for 0-30 days; from 53.7% to 37.0%, respectively, for 30-60 days;
from 74.2% to 52.8%, respectively, for 60-90 days and from 90.7% to 77.9%, respectively, for 90-plus days.
The allowance for loan losses is considered adequate based upon managements assessment of
relevant factors, including the types and amounts of non-performing loans, historical and current
loss experience on such types of loans, and the current economic environment. The following table
provides the amount of delinquent loans at the dates listed. At June 30, 2009, 64.5% of all
delinquent loans are loans in which we had a first lien position on residential real estate.
Delinquent and Nonaccrual Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Days Delinquent |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
$ |
158,303 |
|
|
$ |
145,407 |
|
|
$ |
95,311 |
|
60 |
|
|
94,567 |
|
|
|
111,404 |
|
|
|
69,930 |
|
90 |
|
|
940,777 |
|
|
|
722,301 |
|
|
|
363,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,193,647 |
|
|
$ |
979,112 |
|
|
$ |
529,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment loans |
|
$ |
8,417,849 |
|
|
$ |
9,082,121 |
|
|
$ |
9,091,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquency % |
|
|
14.18 |
% |
|
|
10.78 |
% |
|
|
5.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
We calculate our delinquent loans using a method required by the OTS when we prepare
regulatory reports that we submit to the OTS each quarter. This method, also called the OTS
Method, treats a loan as delinquent if no payment is received after the first day of the month
following the month of the missed payment. Other companies with mortgage banking operations similar
to ours may use the Mortgage Bankers Association Method (MBA Method) which considers a loan to be
delinquent if payment is not received by the end of the month of the missed payment. The key
difference between the two methods is that a loan considered delinquent under the MBA Method
would not be considered delinquent under the OTS Method for another 30 days. Under the MBA
Method of calculating delinquent loans, 30 day delinquencies equaled $253.1 million, 60 day
delinquencies equaled $124.2 million and 90 day delinquencies and other nonaccrual loans equaled
$1.0 billion at June 30, 2009. Total delinquent loans under the MBA Method total $1.4 billion or
16.62% of loans held for investment at June 30, 2009, as compared to, delinquent loans at December
31, 2008 of $1.2 billion, or 13.27% of total loans held for investment.
The following table shows the activity in the allowance for loan losses during the indicated
periods (dollars in thousands):
Activity Within the Allowance For Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
376,000 |
|
|
$ |
104,000 |
|
|
$ |
104,000 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
283,876 |
|
|
|
78,096 |
|
|
|
343,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans |
|
|
(80,558 |
) |
|
|
(16,097 |
) |
|
|
(47,814 |
) |
Consumer loans |
|
|
(17,897 |
) |
|
|
(3,136 |
) |
|
|
(6,505 |
) |
Commercial loans |
|
|
(87,918 |
) |
|
|
(8,952 |
) |
|
|
(15,774 |
) |
Construction loans |
|
|
(1,535 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(1,872 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1,117 |
) |
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
|
(2,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
(189,025 |
) |
|
|
(29,180 |
) |
|
|
(73,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans |
|
|
1,669 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
978 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Construction loans |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
3,149 |
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs, net of recoveries |
|
|
(185,876 |
) |
|
|
(28,096 |
) |
|
|
(71,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
474,000 |
|
|
$ |
154,000 |
|
|
$ |
376,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-off ratio |
|
|
4.18 |
% |
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Interest Receivable. Accrued interest receivable increased from $56.0 million at
December 31, 2008, to $56.1 million at June 30, 2009, as our total earning assets increased. We
typically collect interest in the month following the month in which it is earned.
Repurchased Assets. We sell a majority of the mortgage loans we produce into the secondary
market on a whole loan basis or by securitizing the loans into mortgage-backed securities. When we
sell or securitize mortgage loans, we make customary representations and warranties to the
purchasers about various characteristics of each loan, such as the manner of origination, the
nature and extent of underwriting standards applied and the types of documentation being provided.
When a loan that we have sold or securitized fails to perform according to its contractual terms,
the purchaser will typically review the loan file to determine whether defects in the origination
process occurred and if such defects constitute a violation of our representations and warranties.
If there are no such defects, we have no liability to the purchaser for losses it may incur on such
loan. If a defect is identified, we may be required to either repurchase the loan or indemnify the
purchaser for losses it sustains on the loan. Loans that are repurchased and that are performing
according to their terms are included within our loans held for investment portfolio. Repurchased
assets are loans that we have reacquired because of representation and warranties issues related to
loan sales or securitizations and that are non-performing at the time of repurchase. To the extent
we later foreclose on the loan, the underlying property is transferred to repossessed assets for
disposal. During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we repurchased $13.0 million and
$22.1 million in unpaid principal balance of non-performing loans, respectively. The estimated
fair value of the remaining repurchased assets totaled $18.4 million at June 30, 2009 and $16.5
million at December 31, 2008, and is included within other assets in our consolidated statements of
financial condition.
46
Premises and Equipment. Premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, totaled
$244.2 million at June 30, 2009 and $246.2 million in December 31, 2008. Our investment in
property and equipment has essentially remained constant due to our decision to limit our branch
expansion.
Mortgage Servicing Rights. At June 30, 2009, MSRs included residential MSRs at fair value
amounting to $658.2 million and consumer MSRs at amortized cost amounting to $6.1 million. At
December 31, 2008, residential MSRs amounted to $511.3 million and consumer MSRs at amortized cost
amounted to $9.5 million. During the six month period ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we recorded
additions to our residential MSRs of $191.3 million and $203.7 million, respectively, due to loan
sales or securitizations. Also, during the period ending June 30, 2009, we reduced the amount of
MSRs by $25.5 million related to bulk servicing sales and $72.2 million related to loans that paid
off during the period. Further, the MSRs were increased by $53.4 million related to the realization
of expected cash flows and market driven changes, primarily a increase in mortgage loan rates that
led to an expected decrease in prepayment speeds. See Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 1 Financial Statements herein.
The principal balance of the loans underlying our total MSRs was $61.5 billion at June 30,
2009 versus $55.9 billion at December 31, 2008, with the increase primarily attributable to our
increased loan origination activity for 2009.
Other Assets. Other assets are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Repurchased assets |
|
$ |
18,384 |
|
|
$ |
16,454 |
|
Receivable for FHA insured loans / assets |
|
|
165,549 |
|
|
|
83,709 |
|
Escrow advances |
|
|
69,476 |
|
|
|
56,542 |
|
Tax assets, net |
|
|
232,807 |
|
|
|
181,601 |
|
Derivative assets, including margin accounts |
|
|
128,353 |
|
|
|
93,686 |
|
Other |
|
|
83,650 |
|
|
|
72,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
698,219 |
|
|
$ |
504,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets increased $193.5 million, or 38.3%, to $698.2 million at June 30, 2009 from
$504.7 million at December 31, 2008. The majority of the increase was attributable to an increase
of $81.8 million of our receivables of repurchased FHA insured loans and a $51.2 million increase
in our tax assets, net, due to our loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
Liabilities
Deposit Accounts. Deposit accounts increased $1.6 billion to $9.5 billion at June 30, 2009,
from $7.8 billion at December 31, 2008. The composition of our deposits was as follows:
Deposit Portfolio
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
of |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand accounts |
|
$ |
455,083 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
|
4.81 |
% |
|
$ |
416,920 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
|
5.32 |
% |
Savings accounts |
|
|
558,709 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
5.90 |
|
|
|
407,501 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
MMDA |
|
|
717,816 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
7.58 |
|
|
|
561,909 |
|
|
|
2.61 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
|
Certificates of deposit (1) |
|
|
4,310,498 |
|
|
|
3.62 |
|
|
|
45.51 |
|
|
|
3,967,985 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
|
50.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Retail Deposits |
|
|
6,042,106 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
|
|
63.80 |
|
|
|
5,354,315 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
|
|
68.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public funds(2) |
|
|
420,512 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
4.44 |
|
|
|
597,638 |
|
|
|
2.84 |
|
|
|
7.62 |
|
National accounts |
|
|
1,790,892 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
|
|
|
18.91 |
|
|
|
1,353,558 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
|
17.26 |
|
Company controlled deposits(3) |
|
|
1,217,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.85 |
|
|
|
535,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
$ |
9,470,673 |
|
|
|
2.61 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
7,841,005 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate amount of certificates of deposit with a minimum denomination of $100,000 was
approximately $1.8 billion and $1.7 billion at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Public funds include funds from municipalities and public units. |
|
(3) |
|
These accounts represent the portion of the investor custodial accounts controlled by
Flagstar that have been placed on deposit with the Bank. |
47
The public funds channel was $420.5 million and $597.6 million at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. These deposits have been garnered from local government units
within our retail market area.
Our national accounts division garnered funds through the use of investment banking firms.
National deposit accounts increased a net $0.4 billion to $1.8 billion at June 30, 2009, from $1.4
billion at December 31, 2008. At June 30, 2009, the national deposit accounts had a weighted
maturity of 12 months.
The Company controlled accounts increased $0.7 billion to $1.2 billion at June 30, 2009. This
increase reflects the increase in mortgage loans serviced for others.
The Company participates in the Certificate of
Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) program, through which certain customer certificates of deposit (CD) are
exchanged for CDs of similar amounts from other participating banks. This gives our customers the potential to receive FDIC insurance up
to $50 million. At June 30, 2009, $463.6 million of our total CDs were enrolled in this program, with $221.8 million originating from
public entities and $241.8 million originating from retail customers. In exchange, we received reciprocal CDs from other participating
banks totaling $39.5 million from public entities and $424.1 million from retail customers.
FHLB Advances. Our borrowings from the FHLB, known as FHLB advances, may include floating
rate daily adjustable advances, fixed rate convertible (i.e., putable) advances, and fixed rate
term (i.e., bullet) advances. The following is a breakdown of the advances outstanding (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
Daily adjustable advances |
|
$ |
1,907 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate putable advances |
|
|
2,150,000 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
% |
|
|
2,150,000 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
% |
Short-term fixed rate term advances |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
% |
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
4.79 |
% |
Long-term fixed rate term advances |
|
|
2,200,000 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
% |
|
|
2,400,000 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,151,907 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
$ |
5,200,000 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009, FHLB advances remained virtually unchanged from $5.2 billion at December 31,
2008. We rely upon such advances as a source of funding for the origination or purchase of loans
for sale in the secondary market and for providing duration specific medium-term financing. The
outstanding balance of FHLB advances fluctuates from time to time depending upon our current
inventory of loans available for sale that we fund with the advances and upon the availability of
lower cost funding from our retail deposit base, the escrow accounts we hold, or alternative
funding sources such as security repurchase agreements. Our approved line with the FHLB was $7.0
billion at June 30, 2009.
Security Repurchase Agreements. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are generally
accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and are recorded at the amounts at which the
securities were sold plus accrued interest. Securities, generally mortgage backed securities, are
pledged as collateral under these financing arrangements. The fair value of collateral provided to
a party is continually monitored and additional collateral is provided by or returned to us, as
appropriate. We had security repurchase agreements amounting to $108.0 million at both June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008.
Long Term Debt. Our long-term debt principally consists of junior subordinated notes related
to trust preferred securities issued by our special purpose trust subsidiaries under the Company
rather than the Bank. On June 30, 2009, we issued $51.5 million of junior subordinated notes
related to the sale of $50.0 million trust preferred securities to MatlinPatterson. The notes
mature 30 years from issuance, are callable after five years and pay interest quarterly. At June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had $300.2 million and $248.7 million of long-term debt,
respectively. See Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements, herein.
Accrued Interest Payable. Our accrued interest payable increased $0.4 million from December
31, 2008 to $36.5 million at June 30, 2009. The increase was principally due to the
increase in interest bearing deposits offset in part by a decline in interest rates during 2009 on
our interest-bearing liabilities.
Secondary Market Reserve. We sell most of the residential mortgage loans that we originate
into the secondary mortgage market. When we sell mortgage loans, we make customary representations
and warranties to the purchasers about various characteristics of each loan, such as the manner of
origination, the nature and extent of underwriting standards applied and the types of documentation
being provided. Typically these representations and warranties are in place for the life of the
loan. If a defect in the origination process is identified, we may be required to either
repurchase the loan or indemnify the purchaser for losses it sustains on the loan. If there are no
such defects, we have no liability to the purchaser for losses it may incur on such loan. We
maintain a secondary market reserve to account for the expected losses related to loans we may be
required to repurchase (or the indemnity payments we may have to make to purchasers). The
secondary market reserve takes into account both our estimate of expected losses on loans sold
during the current accounting period, as well as adjustments to our previous estimates of expected
losses on loans sold. In each case these estimates are based on our most recent data regarding
loan repurchases, actual credit losses on repurchased loans and recovery history, among other
factors. Increases to
48
the secondary market reserve for current loan sales reduce our net gain on loan sales.
Adjustments to our previous estimates are recorded as an increase or decrease in our other fees and
charges.
The secondary market reserve increased $2.5 million to $45.0 million at June 30, 2009, from
$42.5 million at December 31, 2008. This increase is attributable to our expected losses and
historical experience of repurchases and claims.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the secondary market reserve within the
periods shown (in thousands):
Secondary Market Reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
42,500 |
|
|
$ |
27,400 |
|
|
$ |
42,500 |
|
|
$ |
27,600 |
|
Provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to gain on sale for current loan sales |
|
|
7,130 |
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
|
|
10,932 |
|
|
|
5,807 |
|
Charged to other fees and charges for changes in
estimates |
|
|
16,909 |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
27,737 |
|
|
|
(1,561 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
24,039 |
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
38,669 |
|
|
|
4,246 |
|
Charge-offs, net |
|
|
(21,539 |
) |
|
|
(2,013 |
) |
|
|
(36,169 |
) |
|
|
(3,846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
$ |
28,000 |
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
$ |
28,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve levels are a function of expected losses based on actual pending and expected
claims and repurchase requests, historical experience and loan volume. While the ultimate amount
of repurchases and claims is uncertain, management believes that the amount of reserves at June 30,
2009 is adequate.
Liquidity and Capital
Liquidity. Liquidity refers to the ability or the financial flexibility to manage future cash
flows in order to meet the needs of depositors and borrowers and fund operations on a timely and
cost-effective basis. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, loan repayments and sales,
advances from the FHLB, security repurchase agreements, cash generated from operations and customer
escrow accounts. We can also draw upon our line of credit at the Federal Reserve discount window.
While we believe that these sources of funds will continue to be adequate to meet our liquidity
needs for the foreseeable future, there is currently illiquidity in the non-agency secondary
mortgage market and reduced investor demand for mortgage-backed securities and loans in that
market. Under these conditions, we use our liquidity, as well as our capital capacity, to hold
increased levels of both securities and loans. While our liquidity and capital positions are
currently sufficient, our capacity to retain loans and securities on our consolidated statement of
financial condition is not unlimited and we have revised our lending guidelines as a result of a
prolonged period of secondary market illiquidity to primarily originate loans that could readily be
sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac or be insured.
Retail deposits increased to $6.0 billion at June 30, 2009, as compared to $5.4 billion at
December 31, 2008.
Mortgage loans sold during the six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $17.6 billion, an
increase of $2.3 billion from the $15.3 billion sold during the same period in 2008. This increase
reflects our $2.9 billion increase in mortgage loan originations during the six months ended June
30, 2009. We attribute this increase to a falling interest rate environment, resulting in an
increase in demand for fixed-rate mortgage loans and an increase in market share. We sold 93.6%
and 99.1% of our mortgage loan originations during the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
We use FHLB advances and security repurchase agreements to fund our daily operational
liquidity needs and to assist in funding loan originations. We will continue to use these sources
of funds as needed to supplement funds from deposits, loan and MSR sales and escrow accounts. We
currently have an authorized line of credit equal to $7.0 billion, which we may draw upon subject
to providing a sufficient amount of loans as collateral. At June 30, 2009, we had available
collateral sufficient to access $5.7 billion of the line of which $0.6 billion was still available
at June 30, 2009. Such advances are usually repaid with the proceeds from the sale of mortgage
loans or from alternative sources of financing.
At June 30, 2009, we had arrangements to enter into security repurchase agreements, a form of
collateralized short-term borrowing, with multiple financial institutions (each of which is a
primary dealer for Federal Reserve purposes). Because we borrow money under these agreements based
on the fair value of our mortgage-backed securities, and because changes in interest rates can
negatively impact the valuation of mortgage-backed securities, our borrowing ability under these
agreements could be limited and lenders could initiate margin calls (i.e., require us to provide
additional collateral) in the event interest rates change or the value of our mortgage-backed
securities declines for other reasons. At both June 30, 2009
49
and 2008, our security repurchase agreements totaled $108.0 million. The security repurchase
agreements were secured by $117.5 million and $124.7 million of U.S. government sponsored agency
mortgage-backed securities classified as securities available for sale at June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively .
At June 30, 2009, we had arrangements with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (FRB) to
borrow as needed from its discount window. The amount we are allowed to borrow is based on the
lendable value of the collateral that we provide. To collateralize the line, we pledge commercial
loans that are eligible based on FRB guidelines. At June 30, 2009, we had pledged commercial loans
amounting to $774.0 million with a lendable value of $426.0 million. At June 30, 2009, we had no
borrowings outstanding against this line of credit.
At June 30, 2009, we had outstanding rate-lock commitments to lend $2.0 billion in mortgage
loans, along with outstanding commitments to make other types of loans totaling $4.3 million. As
such commitments may expire without being drawn upon, they do not necessarily represent future cash
commitments. Also, at June 30, 2009, we had outstanding commitments to sell $3.8 billion of
mortgage loans. We expect that our lending commitment will be funded within 90 days. Total
commercial and consumer unused lines of credit totaled $1.5 billion at June 30, 2009, including
$938.1 million of unused warehouse lines of credit to various mortgage companies and $191.3 million
in undrawn commercial lines of credits. Also, there were $238.5 million in undrawn home equity
lines of credit and $10.4 million in undrawn lines of consumer credit contained within consumer
loans at June 30, 2009.
Regulatory Capital Adequacy. At June 30, 2009, the Bank exceeded all applicable bank
regulatory minimum capital requirements and was considered well capitalized. We are not
subject to regulatory capital requirements.
The Banks regulatory capital includes proceeds from trust preferred securities that were
issued in ten separate private offerings to the capital markets and as to which $290.0 million of
such securities were outstanding at June 30, 2009.
50
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Our exposure to interest rate risk arises from three distinctly managed mechanisms home
lending, mortgage servicing, and structural balance sheet maturity or repricing mismatches.
In our home lending operations, we are exposed to market risk in the form of interest rate
risk from the time we commit to an interest rate on a mortgage loan application through the time we
sell, or commit to sell, the mortgage loan. On a daily basis, we analyze various economic and
market factors to project the amount of mortgage loans we expect to sell for delivery at a future
date. The actual amount of loans sold will be a percentage of the amount of mortgage loans on
which we have issued binding commitments (and thereby locked in the interest rate) but have not yet
closed (pipeline loans) to actual closings. If interest rates change in an unanticipated
fashion, the actual percentage of pipeline loans that close may differ from the projected
percentage. A mismatch of our commitments to fund mortgage loans and our commitments to sell
mortgage loans may have an adverse effect on the results of operations in any such period. For
instance, a sudden increase in interest rates may cause a higher percentage of pipeline loans to
close than we projected, and thereby exceed our commitments to sell that pipeline of loans. As a
result, we could incur losses upon sale of these additional loans to the extent the market rate of
interest is higher than the mortgage interest rate committed to by us on pipeline loans we had
initially anticipated to close. To the extent that the hedging strategies utilized by us are not
successful, our profitability may be adversely affected.
We also service residential mortgages for various external parties. We receive a service fee
based on the unpaid balances of servicing rights as well as ancillary income (late fees, float on
payments, etc.) as compensation for performing the servicing function. An increase in mortgage
prepayments, as is often associated with declining interest rates, can lead to reduced values on
capitalized mortgage servicing rights and ultimately reduced loan servicing revenues. In the first
quarter of 2008, we began to specifically hedge the market risk associated with mortgage servicing
rights using a portfolio of Treasury note futures and options. To the extent that the hedging
strategies are not effective, our profitability associated with the mortgage servicing activity may
be adversely affected.
In addition to the home lending and mortgage servicing operations, our banking operations may
be exposed to market risk due to differences in the timing of the maturity or repricing of assets
versus liabilities, as well as the potential shift in the yield curve. This risk is evaluated and
managed on a company-wide basis using a net portfolio value (NPV) analysis framework. The NPV
analysis is intended to estimate the net sensitivity of the fair value of the assets and
liabilities to sudden and significant changes in the levels of interest rates.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. A review and evaluation was performed by
our principal executive and financial officers regarding the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2009 pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on that review and evaluation, the
principal executive and financial officers have concluded that our current disclosure
controls and procedures, as designed and implemented, are operating effectively.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, there has
been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation
required by Rule 13a-15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
51
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
None.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in response to
Item 1A to Part I of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2008, except as follows:
Current and further deterioration in the housing market, as well as the number of programs
that have been introduced to address the situation by government agencies and government sponsored
enterprises, may lead to increased costs to service loans which could affect our margins or impair
the value of our mortgage servicing rights.
The housing and the residential mortgage markets have experienced a variety of difficulties
and changed economic conditions. In response, federal and state government, as well as the
government sponsored enterprises, have developed a number of programs and instituted a number of
requirements on servicers in an effort to limit foreclosures and, in the case of the government
sponsored enterprises, to minimize losses on loans that they guarantee or own. These additional
programs and requirements may increase operating expenses or otherwise change the costs associated
with servicing loans for others, which may result in lower margins or an impairment in the expected
value of our mortgage servicing rights.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Sale of Unregistered Securities
The Company made no unregistered sales of its equity securities during the quarter
ended June 30, 2009 that have not previously been reported.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company made no purchases of its equity securities during the quarter ended June
30, 2009.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults upon Senior Securities |
None.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
For a description of matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the period, refer
to Item 8.01 of the Companys Current Report of Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2009, which
is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
None.
52
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1*
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as
amended (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K, dated May 29, 2009, and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
3.2*
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Mandatory Convertible Non-Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A of the Company (previously filed
as Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as
of May 20, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.3*
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Convertible Participating Voting
Preferred Stock, Series B of the Company (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of
February 2, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.4*
|
|
Certificate of Designations for Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series C (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated January 30, 2009, and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.5*
|
|
Sixth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
May 29, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.1*
|
|
Indenture, dated as of June 30, 2009, by and between Flagstar
Bancorp, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company (previously filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
July 1, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.2*
|
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated as of June 30, 2009,
by and among Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., Wilmington Trust Company and
each of the Administrators named therein (previously filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
July 1, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.3*
|
|
Guarantee Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2009, by and between
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company (previously filed
as Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
July 1, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.10*+
|
|
Flagstar Bancorp Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated May 29, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.25*+
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2009, between
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., Flagstar Bank, FSB, and Mark T. Hammond
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated June 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.26*
|
|
Capital Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2009, by
and between Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., Flagstar Statutory Trust XI, a
Delaware statutory trust and MP Thrift Investments L.P. (previously
filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K,
dated July 1, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
11
|
|
Computation of Net Earnings per Share |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated herein by reference |
|
+ |
|
Constitutes a management contract or compensation plan or arrangement |
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLAGSTAR BANCORP, INC.
|
|
Date: August 5, 2009 |
/s/ Mark T. Hammond
|
|
|
Mark T. Hammond |
|
|
President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Paul D. Borja
|
|
|
Paul D. Borja |
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
54
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1*
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as
amended (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K, dated May 29, 2009, and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
3.2*
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Mandatory Convertible Non-Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A of the Company (previously filed
as Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as
of May 20, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.3*
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Convertible Participating Voting
Preferred Stock, Series B of the Company (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of
February 2, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.4*
|
|
Certificate of Designations for Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series C (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated January 30, 2009, and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.5*
|
|
Sixth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
May 29, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.1*
|
|
Indenture, dated as of June 30, 2009, by and between Flagstar
Bancorp, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company (previously filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
July 1, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.2*
|
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated as of June 30, 2009,
by and among Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., Wilmington Trust Company and
each of the Administrators named therein (previously filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
July 1, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.3*
|
|
Guarantee Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2009, by and between
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company (previously filed
as Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
July 1, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.10*+
|
|
Flagstar Bancorp Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated May 29, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.25*+
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2009, between
Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., Flagstar Bank, FSB, and Mark T. Hammond
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated June 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.26*
|
|
Capital Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2009, by
and between Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., Flagstar Statutory Trust XI, a
Delaware statutory trust and MP Thrift Investments L.P. (previously
filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K,
dated July 1, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
11
|
|
Statement regarding Computation of Net Earnings per Share |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated herein by reference |
|
+ |
|
Constitutes a management contract or compensation plan or arrangement |
55