Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20429
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number 0-29709
HARLEYSVILLE SAVINGS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Pennsylvania   23-3028464
     
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
271 Main Street, Harleysville, Pennsylvania 19438
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(215) 256-8828
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer o
  Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value, 3,674,187 shares outstanding as of August 13, 2010
 
 

 

 


 

HARLEYSVILLE SAVINGS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Index
         
    PAGE(S)  
 
       
       
 
       
       
 
       
    1  
 
       
    2  
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6 – 17  
 
       
    18 – 20  
 
       
    20 – 21  
 
       
    22  
 
       
       
 
       
    23  
 
       
    23  
 
       
    23  
 
       
    23  
 
       
    23  
 
       
    23  
 
       
    23  
 
       
    24  
 
       
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32.0

 

 


Table of Contents

Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
                 
    June 30,     September 30,  
(In thousands, except share data)   2010     2009  
 
               
Assets
               
Cash and amounts due from depository institutions
  $ 3,646     $ 3,222  
Interest bearing deposits
    11,014       6,220  
 
           
Total cash and cash equivalents
    14,660       9,442  
 
               
Investment securities held to maturity (fair value — June 30, $141,123; September 30, $106,174)
    139,728       105,194  
Investment securities available-for-sale at fair value
    3,516       6,728  
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity (fair value — June 30, $150,851; September 30, $169,210)
    143,424       162,430  
Mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale at fair value
    787       785  
Loans receivable (net of allowance for loan losses — June 30, $2,437; September 30, $2,094)
    515,809       498,391  
Accrued interest receivable
    3,367       3,719  
Federal Home Loan Bank stock — at cost
    16,096       16,096  
Foreclosed real estate
          747  
Office properties and equipment, net
    12,229       10,486  
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    17,493       15,989  
 
           
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 867,109     $ 830,007  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
               
Liabilities:
               
Deposits
  $ 522,770     $ 466,601  
Long-term debt
    283,730       309,046  
Accrued interest payable
    1,475       1,606  
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance
    5,737       1,445  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    909       1,170  
 
           
Total liabilities
    814,621       779,868  
 
           
 
               
Commitments and contingencies
               
 
               
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Preferred Stock: $.01 par value; 7,500,000 shares authorized; none issued
           
Common stock: $.01 par value; 15,000,000 shares authorized; 3,921,177 shares issued; outstanding June 30, 2010 3,674,187 shares September 30, 2009 3,627,696 shares
    39       39  
Additional paid-in capital
    8,085       8,002  
Treasury stock, at cost (June 30, 2010, 246,990 shares; September 30, 2009, 293,481 shares)
    (3,565 )     (4,202 )
Retained earnings — partially restricted
    47,940       46,329  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    (11 )     (29 )
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    52,488       50,139  
 
           
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 867,109     $ 830,007  
 
           
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

page -1-


Table of Contents

Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Nine Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
(In thousands, except per share data)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
Interest Income:
                               
Interest on mortgage loans
  $ 5,043     $ 4,961     $ 15,118     $ 15,066  
Interest on commercial loans
    1,108       774       3,023       2,223  
Interest on mortgage-backed securities
    1,657       2,209       5,335       7,163  
Interest on consumer and other loans
    1,080       1,144       3,307       3,639  
Interest on other taxable investments
    802       572       2,562       2,134  
Interest on tax-exempt investments
    260       312       804       968  
Dividends on investment securities
    1       1       2       10  
 
                       
Total interest income
    9,951       9,973       30,151       31,203  
 
                       
 
                               
Interest Expense:
                               
Interest on deposits
    2,121       2,642       6,929       8,356  
Interest on borrowings
    3,169       3,486       9,655       10,460  
 
                       
Total interest expense
    5,290       6,128       16,584       18,816  
 
                       
 
                               
Net Interest Income
    4,661       3,845       13,567       12,387  
Provision for loan losses
    150       90       450       290  
 
                       
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses
    4,511       3,755       13,117       12,097  
 
                       
 
                               
Other Income:
                               
Customer service fees
    176       161       488       497  
Impairment of equity securities
                      (449 )
Gain on sale of investments
                      (11 )
Loss on sale of investments
                      20  
Income on bank-owned life insurance
    122       121       365       364  
Other income
    210       178       615       534  
 
                       
Total other income
    508       460       1,468       955  
 
                       
 
                               
Other Expenses:
                               
Salaries and employee benefits
    1,743       1,523       5,174       4,719  
Occupancy and equipment
    356       299       985       900  
Deposit insurance premiums
    229       604       682       861  
Data processing
    167       146       489       409  
Other
    710       541       2,175       1,798  
 
                       
Total other expenses
    3,205       3,113       9,505       8,687  
 
                       
 
                               
Income before Income Taxes
    1,814       1,102       5,080       4,365  
 
                               
Income tax expense
    500       246       1,392       930  
 
                       
 
                               
Net Income
  $ 1,314     $ 856     $ 3,688     $ 3,435  
 
                       
 
                               
Basic Earnings Per Share
  $ 0.36     $ 0.24     $ 1.01     $ 0.96  
 
                       
Diluted Earnings Per Share
  $ 0.36     $ 0.24     $ 1.01     $ 0.95  
 
                       
 
                               
Dividends Per Share
  $ 0.19     $ 0.18     $ 0.57     $ 0.54  
 
                       
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

page -2-


Table of Contents

Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    June 30,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009  
 
               
Net Income
  $ 1,314     $ 856  
 
               
Other Comprehensive Income
               
 
               
Unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale, net of tax (benefit) expense 2010, $19; 2009, $3 and reclassifications
    (39 )(1)     6 (1)
 
           
 
               
Total Comprehensive Income
  $ 1,275     $ 862  
 
           
 
    2010     2009  
(1) Disclosure of reclassification amount, net of tax for the three months ended:
               
Net unrealized (loss) gain arising during the three months ended
  $ (58 )   $ 9  
Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income
           
 
           
 
               
 
    (58 )     9  
Tax benefit (expense)
    19       (3 )
 
           
Net unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale
  $ (39 )   $ 6  
 
           
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    June 30,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009  
 
               
Net Income
  $ 3,688     $ 3,435  
 
               
Other Comprehensive Income
               
 
               
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax expense 2010, $10; 2009, $1 and reclassifications
    18 (1)     2 (1)
 
           
 
               
Total Comprehensive Income
  $ 3,706     $ 3,437  
 
           
 
    2010     2009  
(1) Disclosure of reclassification amount, net of tax for the six months ended:
               
Net unrealized gain (loss) arising during the nine months ended
  $ 28     $ (437 )
Reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income
          440  
 
           
 
               
 
    28       3  
Tax expense
    (10 )     (1 )
 
           
Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale
  $ 18     $ 2  
 
           
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

page -3-


Table of Contents

Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
                                                         
    Common                     Retained     Accumulated                
    Stock             Additional     Earnings-     Other             Total  
    Shares     Common     Paid-in     Partially     Comprehensive     Treasury     Stockholders’  
(In thousands, except share and per share data)   Outstanding     Stock     Capital     Restricted     (Loss) / Income     Stock     Equity  
 
                                                       
Balance at October 1, 2009
    3,627,696     $ 39     $ 8,002     $ 46,329     $ (29 )   $ (4,202 )   $ 50,139  
 
                                                       
Net income
                            3,688                       3,688  
Dividends — $.57 per share
                            (2,077 )                     (2,077 )
Stock option compensation
                    124                               124  
Treasury Stock Purchase
    (5,659 )                                     (77 )     (77 )
Treasury stock delivered under ESOP
    10,000                                       137       137  
Treasury stock delivered under reinvestment plan
    31,200               3                       427       430  
Employee options exercised
    10,950               (44 )                     150       106  
Change in unrealized holding loss on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification and tax
                                    18               18  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Balance at June 30, 2010
    3,674,187     $ 39     $ 8,085     $ 47,940     $ (11 )   $ (3,565 )   $ 52,488  
 
                                         
                                                         
    Common                     Retained     Accumulated                
    Stock             Additional     Earnings-     Other             Total  
    Shares     Common     Paid-in     Partially     Comprehensive     Treasury     Stockholders’  
(In thousands, except share and per share data)   Outstanding     Stock     Capital     Restricted     (Loss) / Income     Stock     Equity  
 
                                                       
Balance at October 1, 2008
    3,567,934     $ 39     $ 7,993     $ 44,235     $ (41 )   $ (5,017 )   $ 47,209  
 
                                                       
Net income
                            3,435                       3,435  
Dividends — $.54 per share
                            (1,936 )                     (1,936 )
Stock option compensation
                    102                               102  
Treasury stock delivered under ESOP
    10,000               (17 )                     137       120  
Treasury stock delivered under reinvestment plan
    34,885               (47 )                     478       431  
Employee options exercised
    2,084               (9 )                     29       20  
Change in unrealized holding loss on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification and tax
                                    2               2  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Balance at June 30, 2009
    3,614,903     $ 39     $ 8,022     $ 45,734     $ (39 )   $ (4,373 )   $ 49,383  
 
                                         
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

page -4-


Table of Contents

Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
                 
    Nine Months Ended June 30,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009  
Operating Activities:
               
Net Income
  $ 3,688     $ 3,435  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation
    416       347  
Provision for loan losses
    450       290  
Realized net gains on securities
          (9 )
Loss on impairment of equity securities
          449  
Loss on sale of foreclosed real estate
    159        
Amortization of deferred loan fees
    62       47  
Net amortization of premiums and discounts
    127       107  
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance
    (365 )     (364 )
Compensation charge on stock options
    124       102  
Changes in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash:
               
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses
    (261 )     (453 )
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets
    (1,139 )     (1,063 )
Decrease in accrued interest receivable
    352       458  
Decrease in accrued interest payable
    (131 )     (71 )
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    3,482       3,275  
 
               
Investing Activities:
               
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities held to maturity
    (14,986 )      
Purchase of investment securities held to maturity
    (84,956 )     (25,000 )
Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale
    (71,301 )     (55,050 )
Net purchase of FHLB stock
          478  
Proceeds from the redemption of investment securities available-for-sale
    74,529       35,572  
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities held to maturity
    50,529       1,365  
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate
    588        
Principal collected on mortgage-backed securities
    33,758       64,112  
Principal collected on loans receivable
    85,411       101,726  
Loans originated or acquired
    (103,341 )     (108,870 )
Purchases of premises and equipment
    (2,159 )     (317 )
 
           
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
    (31,928 )     14,016  
 
               
Financing Activities:
               
Net increase in demand deposits, NOW accounts and savings accounts
    71,307       17,606  
Net (decrease) increase in certificates of deposit
    (15,138 )     7,878  
Cash dividends
    (1,647 )     (1,505 )
Net decrease in short-term borrowings
          (21,800 )
Proceeds from long-term debt
          24,500  
Repayment of long-term debt
    (25,316 )     (34,458 )
Acquisition of treasury stock
    (77 )      
Treasury stock delivered under employee stock plans
    243       140  
Net increase in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance
    4,292       4,100  
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    33,664       (3,539 )
 
           
 
               
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    5,218       13,752  
 
               
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
    9,442       9,374  
 
           
 
               
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR
  $ 14,660     $ 23,126  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
               
Cash paid during the period for:
               
Interest
  $ 16,715     $ 12,887  
Income taxes
    1,175       1,203  
Non — cash transfer of loans to real estate owned
          567  
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

page -5-


Table of Contents

Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation — The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation (the “Company”) and its subsidiary. Harleysville Savings Bank (the “Bank”) is the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Bank, and the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, HSB Inc, a Delaware corporation which was formed in order to hold certain assets, Freedom Financial LLC that allows the Company to offer non deposit products and HARL LLC that allows the Bank to invest in equity investments. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and therefore do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. However, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire fiscal year ending September 30, 2010 or any other period. The financial information should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2009.
Use of Estimates in Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant of these estimates are the allowance for loan losses, the determination of other-than-temporary impairment on securities and the valuation of deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior period’s financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s classifications. The reclassifications had no effect on net income.
Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date of June 30, 2010 through the date of issuance of these financial statements for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these financial statements.

 

page -6-


Table of Contents

New Accounting Standards
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) — Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. This Update amends the Accounting Standards (Codification) for the issuance of FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. The amendments in this Update improve financial reporting by eliminating the exceptions for qualifying special-purpose entities from the consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale accounting for certain mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred financial assets. In addition, the amendments require enhanced disclosures about the risks that a transferor continues to be exposed to because of its continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. Comparability and consistency in accounting for transferred financial assets will also be improved through clarifications of the requirements for isolation and limitations on portions of financial assets that are eligible for sale accounting. This Update is effective at the start of a reporting entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009. Early application is not permitted. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact that the adoption of this new guidance will have on our financial position and results of operations.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17, Consolidations (Topic 810) — Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. This Update amends the Codification for the issuance of FASB Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). The amendments in this Update replace the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which reporting entity, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which reporting entity has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. An approach that is expected to be primarily qualitative will be more effective for identifying which reporting entity has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The amendments in this Update also require additional disclosures about a reporting entity’s involvement in variable interest entities, which will enhance the information provided to users of financial statements. This Update is effective at the start of a reporting entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009. Early application is not permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have an impact on our financial position or result of operations.

 

page -7-


Table of Contents

The FASB has issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This ASU requires some new disclosures and clarifies some existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement as set forth in Codification Subtopic 820-10. The FASB’s objective is to improve these disclosures and, thus, increase the transparency in financial reporting. Specifically, ASU 2010-06 amends Codification Subtopic 820-10 to now require:
    A reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers; and
    In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements.
In addition, ASU 2010-06 clarifies the requirements of the following existing disclosures:
    For purposes of reporting fair value measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities; and
    A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements.
ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.
ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. The amendments in the ASU remove the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. GAAP.
All of the amendments in the ASU were effective upon issuance (February 24, 2010). The adoption of this new guidance did not have an impact on our financial position or result of operations.
ASU 2010-18, Receivables (Topic 310): Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset, codifies the consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 09-I, “Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset.” The amendments to the Codification provide that modifications of loans that are accounted for within a pool under Subtopic 310-30 do not result in the removal of those loans from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. ASU 2010-18 does not affect the accounting for loans under the scope of Subtopic 310-30 that are not accounted for within pools. Loans accounted for individually under Subtopic 310-30 continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within Subtopic 310-40.

 

page -8-


Table of Contents

ASU 2010-18 is effective prospectively for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. Early application is permitted. Upon initial adoption of ASU 2010-18, an entity may make a one-time election to terminate accounting for loans as a pool under Subtopic 310-30. This election may be applied on a pool-by-pool basis and does not preclude an entity from applying pool accounting to subsequent acquisitions of loans with credit deterioration. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact that the adoption of this new guidance will have on our financial position and results of operations.
ASU 20100-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, will help investors assess the credit risk of a company’s receivables portfolio and the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses held against the portfolios by expanding credit risk disclosures.
This ASU requires more information about the credit quality of financing receivables in the disclosures to financial statements, such as aging information and credit quality indicators. Both new and existing disclosures must be disaggregated by portfolio segment or class. The disaggregation of information is based on how a company develops its allowance for credit losses and how it manages its credit exposure.
The amendments in this update apply to all public and nonpublic entities with financing receivables. Financing receivables include loans and trade accounts receivable. However, short-term trade accounts receivable, receivables measured at fair value or lower of cost or fair value, and debt securities are exempt from these disclosure amendments.
The effective date of ASU 2010-20 differs for public and nonpublic companies. For public companies, the amendments that require disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The amendments that require disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. For nonpublic companies, the amendments are effective for annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2011. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact that the adoption of this new guidance will have on our financial position and results of operations.

 

page -9-


Table of Contents

2. INVESTMENT SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY
A comparison of amortized cost and approximate fair value of investment securities held to maturity with gross unrealized gains and losses, by maturities, is as follows:
                                 
    June 30, 2010  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized        
(In Thousands)   Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
U.S. Government Agencies
                               
Due 1 year or less
  $ 14,978     $ 9     $     $ 14,987  
Due after 1 year through 5 years
    13,000       173             13,173  
Due after 5 years through 10 years
    25,000       203             25,203  
Due after 10 years through 15 years
    64,991       348       (3 )     65,336  
Due after 15 years
    2,432       160             2,592  
Tax Exempt Municipal Obligations
                               
Due after 5 years through 10 years
    4,563       111             4,674  
Due after 10 years through 15 years
    12,752       521       (19 )     13,254  
Due after 15 years
    2,012             (108 )     1,904  
 
                       
 
                               
Total Investment Securities
  $ 139,728     $ 1,525     $ (130 )   $ 141,123  
 
                       
                                 
    September 30, 2009  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized        
(In Thousands)   Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
U.S. Government Agencies
                               
Due 1 year or less
  $ 5,000     $ 98     $     $ 5,098  
Due after 1 year through 5 years
    8,000       34             8,034  
Due after 5 years through 10 years
    10,996       4       (80 )     10,920  
Due after 10 years through 15 years
    56,175       299       (278 )     56,196  
Due after 15 years
    2,431       178             2,609  
Tax Exempt Municipal Obligations
                               
Due after 5 years through 10 years
    3,898       170             4,068  
Due after 10 years through 15 years
    16,303       708       (3 )     17,008  
Due after 15 years
    2,391             (150 )     2,241  
 
                       
 
                               
Total Investment Securities
  $ 105,194     $ 1,491     $ (511 )   $ 106,174  
 
                       
A summary of investments with unrealized losses, aggregated by category, at June 30, 2010 is as follows:
                                                 
    Less than 12 Months     12 Months or Longer     Total     Total  
(In Thousands)   Fair Value     Unrealized Losses     Fair Value     Unrealized Losses     Fair Value     Unrealized Losses  
US Government agencies
  $ 4,997     $ (3 )   $     $     $ 4,997     $ (3 )
Tax exempt municipal obligations
                3,268       (127 )     3,268       (127 )
 
                                   
Total
  $ 4,997     $ (3 )   $ 3,268     $ (127 )   $ 8,265     $ (130 )
 
                                   
At June 30, 2010, investment securities in a gross unrealized loss position consisted of 6 securities that at such date had an aggregate depreciation of 1.54% from the Company’s amortized cost basis. Management believes that the estimated fair value of the securities disclosed above is primarily dependent upon the movement in market interest rates. Management evaluated the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost; the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer. The Company does not have the intent to sell these securities prior to recovery and the Company does not believe it will be required to sell such securities prior to recovery. Management does not believe any individual unrealized loss as of June 30, 2010 represents an other-than-temporary impairment.
A summary of investments with unrealized losses, aggregated by category, at September 30, 2009 is as follows:
                                                 
    Less than 12 Months     12 Months or Longer     Total     Total  
(In Thousands)   Fair Value     Unrealized Losses     Fair Value     Unrealized Losses     Fair Value     Unrealized Losses  
US Government agencies
  $ 29,637     $ (358 )   $     $     $ 29,637     $ (358 )
Tax exempt municipal obligations
    1,000       (3 )     3,036       (150 )     4,036       (153 )
 
                                   
Total
  $ 30,637     $ (361 )   $ 3,036     $ (150 )   $ 33,673     $ (511 )
 
                                   

 

page -10-


Table of Contents

3. INVESTMENT SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE
A comparison of amortized cost and approximate fair value of investment securities available for sale with gross unrealized gains and losses is as follows:
                                 
    June 30, 2010  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized        
(In Thousands)   Cost     Gain     Losses     Fair Value  
 
                               
Equity Securities of Financial Institutions
  $ 355     $ 45     $ (63 )   $ 337  
Money Market Mutual Funds
    3,179                   3,179  
 
                       
 
                               
Total Investment Securities
  $ 3,534     $ 45     $ (63 )   $ 3,516  
 
                       
                                 
    September 30, 2009  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized        
(In Thousands)   Cost     Gain     Losses     Fair Value  
 
                               
Equity Securities of Financial Institutions
  $ 355     $ 48     $ (92 )   $ 311  
Money Market Mutual Funds
    6,417                   6,417  
 
                       
 
                               
Total Investment Securities
  $ 6,772     $ 48     $ (92 )   $ 6,728  
 
                       
A summary of investments with unrealized losses, aggregated by category, at June 30, 2010 is as follows:
                                                 
    Less than 12 Months     12 Months or Longer              
(In Thousands)   Fair Value     Unrealized Losses     Fair Value     Unrealized Losses     Fair Value     Unrealized Losses  
Equity Securities of Financial Institutions
  $ 54     $ (3 )   $ 152     $ (60 )   $ 206     $ (63 )
 
                                   
As of June 30, 2010 there were four equity securities in an unrealized loss position. Management evaluated the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than cost; the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer such as changes in technology that may impair the earnings potential of the investment or the discontinuance of a segment of the business that may affect the future earnings potential. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these securities until recovery. Management does not believe any individual unrealized loss as of June 30, 2010 represents an other-than-temporary impairment.
A summary of investments with unrealized losses, aggregated by category, at September 30, 2009 is as follows:
                                                 
    Less than 12 Months     12 Months or Longer     Total     Total  
(In Thousands)   Fair Value     Unrealized Losses     Fair Value     Unrealized Losses     Fair Value     Unrealized Losses  
Equity Securities of Financial Institutions
  $ 104     $ (43 )   $ 74     $ (49 )   $ 178     $ (92 )
 
                                   

 

page -11-


Table of Contents

4. MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY
A comparison of amortized cost and approximate fair value of mortgage-backed securities held to maturity with gross unrealized gains and losses, is as follows:
                                 
    June 30, 2010  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Approximate  
(In Thousands)   Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
 
                               
Collateralized mortgage obligations
  $ 22,509     $ 162     $ (330 )   $ 22,341  
FHLMC pass-through certificates
    50,468       3,267             53,735  
FNMA pass-through certificates
    68,902       4,290             73,192  
GNMA pass-through certificates
    1,545       38             1,583  
 
                       
Total residential mortgage-backed securities
  $ 143,424     $ 7,757     $ (330 )   $ 150,851  
 
                       
                                 
    September 30, 2009  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Approximate  
(In Thousands)   Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
 
                               
Collateralized mortgage obligations
  $ 11,681     $ 54     $ (271 )   $ 11,464  
FHLMC pass-through certificates
    65,005       3,270             68,275  
FNMA pass-through certificates
    85,744       3,728       (1 )     89,471  
 
                       
Total residential mortgage-backed securities
  $ 162,430     $ 7,052     $ (272 )   $ 169,210  
 
                       
A summary of securities with unrealized losses, aggregated by category, at June 30, 2010 is as follows:
                                                 
    Less than 12 Months     12 Months or Longer     Total     Total  
(In Thousands)   Fair Value     Unrealized Losses     Fair Value     Unrealized Losses     Fair Value     Unrealized Losses  
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations held to maturity
  $ 13,263     $ (250 )   $ 1,607     $ (80 )   $ 14,870     $ (330 )
 
                                   
At June 30, 2010, collateralized mortgage obligations in a gross unrealized loss for less than twelve months consisted of 6 securities that at such date had an aggregate depreciation of 1.85% from the Company’s amortized cost basis. At June 30, 2010, collateralized mortgage obligations in a gross unrealized loss position for twelve months or longer consisted of one security that at such date had an aggregate depreciation of 4.76% from the Company’s amortized cost basis. Management believes that the estimated fair value of the securities disclosed above is primarily dependent upon the movement in market interest rates. Management evaluated the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost; the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer. The Company does not have the intent to sell these securities prior to recovery and the Company does not believe it will be required to sell such securities prior to recovery. Management does not believe any individual unrealized loss as of June 30, 2010 represents an other-than-temporary impairment.
A summary of securities with unrealized losses, aggregated by category, at September 30, 2009 is as follows:
                                                 
    Less than 12 Months     12 Months or Longer     Total     Total  
(In Thousands)   Fair Value     Unrealized Losses     Fair Value     Unrealized Losses     Fair Value     Unrealized Losses  
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations held to maturity
  $ 2,264     $ (49 )   $ 6,576     $ (223 )   $ 8,840     $ (272 )
 
                                   

 

page -12-


Table of Contents

5. MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE
A comparison of amortized cost and approximate fair value of mortgage-backed securities available for sale with gross unrealized gains and losses, is as follows:
                                 
    June 30, 2010  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized        
(In thousands)   Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
 
                               
FNMA pass-through certificates
  $ 785     $ 2     $     $ 787  
 
                       
 
                               
Total Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities
  $ 785     $ 2     $     $ 787  
 
                       
                                 
    September 30, 2009  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized        
(In thousands)   Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
 
                               
FNMA pass-through certificates
  $ 785     $     $     $ 785  
 
                       
 
                               
Total Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities
  $ 785     $     $     $ 785  
 
                       
6. LOANS RECEIVABLE
Loans receivable consist of the following:
                 
    (In thousands)  
    June 30, 2010     September 30, 2009  
Residential Mortgages
  $ 349,639     $ 346,202  
Construction
    4,269       2,912  
Home Equity
    89,633       92,434  
Commercial Mortgages
    58,304       48,958  
Commercial Business Loans
    17,239       10,389  
Consumer Non-Real Estate
    1,993       2,242  
 
           
 
               
Total
    521,077       503,137  
Undisbursed portion of loans in process
    (1,989 )     (1,873 )
Deferred loan fees
    (842 )     (779 )
Allowance for loan losses
    (2,437 )     (2,094 )
 
           
 
               
Loans Receivable — net
  $ 515,809     $ 498,391  
 
           
The total amount of loans being serviced for the benefit of others was approximately $1,936,000 and $2,550,000 at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively.
The following schedule summarizes the changes in the allowance for loan losses:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
(In thousands)   June 30, 2010     June 30, 2009     June 30, 2010     June 30, 2009  
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 2,330     $ 2,193     $ 2,094     $ 1,988  
Provision for loan losses
    150       90       450       290  
Recoveries
    1       9       8       26  
Charge offs
    (44 )     (20 )     (115 )     (32 )
 
                       
Balance, end of period
  $ 2,437     $ 2,272     $ 2,437     $ 2,272  
 
                       
7. Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
Federal law requires a member institution of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) to hold stock of its district FHLB according to a predetermined formula. The restricted stock is carried at cost. In December 2008, the FHLB of Pittsburgh notified member banks that it was suspending dividend payments and the repurchase of capital stock.
Management’s determination of whether these investments are impaired is based on their assessment of the ultimate recoverability of their cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB, and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the FHLB.
Management believes no impairment charge is necessary related to the FHLB restricted stock as of June 30, 2010.

 

page -13-


Table of Contents

8. DEPOSITS
Deposits are summarized as follows:
                 
    (In thousands)  
    June 30, 2010     September 30, 2009  
Non-interest bearing checking accounts
  $ 15,706     $ 12,364  
NOW accounts
    26,699       16,818  
Interest bearing checking accounts
    31,624       29,282  
Money market demand accounts
    132,645       77,432  
Passbook and club accounts
    3,469       2,940  
Certificate of deposit accounts
    312,627       327,765  
 
           
Total deposits
  $ 522,770     $ 466,601  
 
           
The aggregate amount of certificate accounts in denominations of more than $100,000 at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 amounted to approximately $58.0 million and $60.1 million, respectively.
9. COMMITMENTS
At June 30, 2010, the following commitments were outstanding:
         
    (In thousands)  
Letters of credit
  $ 466  
Commitments to originate loans
    13,383  
Unused portion of home equity lines of credits
    52,883  
Unused portion of commercial lines of credits
    5,398  
Undisbursed portion of construction loans in process
    1,776  
 
     
 
Total
  $ 73,906  
 
     
Outstanding letters of credit written are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The majority of these standby letters of credit expire within the next twelve months. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending other loan commitments. The Company requires collateral supporting these letters of credit as deemed necessary. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of such collateral would be sufficient to cover the maximum potential amount of future payments required under the corresponding guarantees. The current amount of the liability as of June 30, 2010 for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued is not material.

 

page -14-


Table of Contents

10. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following shares were used for the computation of earnings per share:
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Nine Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Basic
    3,667,319       3,608,620       3,651,495       3,591,380  
Diluted
    3,700,510       3,622,751       3,671,977       3,602,169  
The difference between the number of shares used for computation of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share represents the dilutive effect of stock options. There were 192,083 and 194,583 stock options that were anti-dilutive for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively. There were 192,083 and 226,386 stock options that were anti-dilutive for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
11. LONG-TERM DEBT
Advances consists of the following:
                                 
    June 30,     September 30,  
    2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
            Weighted             Weighted  
            Interest             Interest  
Maturing Period   Amount     Rate     Amount     Rate  
 
 
1 to 12 months
  $ 15,000       4.71 %   $ 30,358       4.37 %
13 to 24 months
    53,635       4.57 %     16,849       4.34 %
25 to 36 months
    32,877       3.79 %     55,793       4.49 %
37 to 48 months
    44,014       4.25 %     37,189       4.00 %
49 to 60 months
    3,527       3.58 %     29,856       4.07 %
61 to 72 months
    20,000       4.13 %     19,031       3.82 %
73 to 84 months
    30,000       4.86 %     10,000       4.71 %
85 to 120 months
    84,677       4.27 %     109,970       4.42 %
 
                       
 
 
Total
  $ 283,730       4.34 %   $ 309,046       4.31 %
 
                       
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances are collateralized by Federal Home Loan Bank stock and substantially all first mortgage loans. The Company has a line of credit with the FHLB of which $0 out of $75.0 million was used at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. Included in the table above at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 are convertible advances whereby the FHLB has the option at a predetermined strike rate to convert the fixed interest rate to an adjustable rate tied to London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). The Company then has the option to repay these advances if the FHLB converts the interest rate. These advances are included in the periods in which they mature. The Company has a total FHLB borrowing capacity of $465 million of which $233.7 was used as of June 30, 2010. In addition, there are four long-term advances from other financial institutions totaling $50 million that are secured by investment and mortgage-backed securities.
12. REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory — and possibly additional discretionary — actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Companies consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to assets (as defined). Management believes, as of June 30, 2010, that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
As of June 30, 2010, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.
The Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the table. The Company’s capital ratios are not significantly different than the Bank’s ratios disclosed below.
                                                 
                                    To Be Considered Well  
                                    Capitalized Under  
                    For Capital     Prompt Corrective  
    Actual     Adequacy Purposes     Action Provisions  
    Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio  
    (In thousands)  
As of June 30, 2010
                                               
Tier 1 Capital (to assets)
  $ 52,487       6.13 %   $ 34,234       4.00 %   $ 42,792       5.00 %
Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets)
    52,487       11.21 %     18,726       4.00 %     28,089       6.00 %
Total Capital (to risk weighted assets)
    54,924       11.73 %     37,452       8.00 %     46,815       10.00 %
 
                                               
As of September 30, 2009
                                               
Tier 1 Capital (to assets)
  $ 50,149       6.06 %   $ 33,103       4.00 %   $ 41,459       5.00 %
Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets)
    50,149       11.26 %     17,809       4.00 %     26,714       6.00 %
Total Capital (to risk weighted assets)
    52,242       11.73 %     35,618       8.00 %     44,523       10.00 %

 

page -15-


Table of Contents

13. FAIR VALUES MEASUREMENTS AND DISCLOSURES
The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the accounting guidance adopted by the Company, effective October 1, 2008, the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumption used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.
The fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is determined at a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.
The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under are as follows:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little or no market activity).
An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 are as follows:
                                 
            (Level 1)     (Level 2)        
            Quoted Prices in     Significant     (Level 3)  
            Active Markets     Other     Significant  
    June 30,     for Identical     Observable     Unobservable  
Description   2010     Assets     Inputs     Inputs  
Investment securities available for sale
  $ 3,516     $ 3,516     $     $  
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale
    787             787        
 
                       
 
  $ 4,303     $ 3,516     $ 787     $  
 
                       
                                 
            (Level 1)     (Level 2)        
            Quoted Prices in     Significant     (Level 3)  
            Active Markets     Other     Significant  
    September 30,     for Identical     Observable     Unobservable  
Description   2009     Assets     Inputs     Inputs  
Investment securities available for sale
  $ 6,728     $ 6,728     $     $  
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale
    785             785        
 
                       
 
  $ 7,513     $ 6,728     $ 785     $  
 
                       
For financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at June 30, 2010 are as follows:
                                 
            Fair Value Measurements Using  
            Quoted Prices     Significant        
            in Active     Other     Significant  
            Markets for     Observable     Unobservable  
    June 30,     Identical Assets     Inputs     Inputs  
Description   2010     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
Impaired Loans
  $ 186     $     $     $ 186  
 
                       
The Company has no financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at September 30, 2009.
The following valuation techniques were used to measure fair value of the Company’s financial instruments in the tables above and below:
Cash and Cash Equivalents (Carried at Cost)
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate those assets’ fair values.
Securities
The fair value of securities available for sale (carried at fair value) and held to maturity (carried at amortized cost) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.

 

page -16-


Table of Contents

Loans Receivable (Carried at Cost)
The fair values of loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans. Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal. Generally, for variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.
Impaired loans are those loans which the Company has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. The fair value consists of the loan balances of 312,000 less their specific valuation allowances of $126,000.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock (Carried at Cost)

The carrying amount of this restricted investment in bank stock approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.
Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable (Carried at Cost)
The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.
Deposit Liabilities (Carried at Cost)
The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest checking, passbook savings and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of a aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
Borrowings (Carried at Cost)
Fair values of borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted prices for new advances with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity. These prices obtained from this active market represent a market value that is deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments (Disclosed at Cost)
Fair values for the Company’s off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments and letters of credit) are based on fees currently charged in the market to enter into similar agreements, taking into account, the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparies’ credit standing. The fair value of these off-balance sheet financial instruments are not considered material as of June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009.
The estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgement is necessarily required to interpret the data to develop the estimates.
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments are as follows.
                                 
    June 30, 2010     September 30, 2009  
    Carrying     Estimated Fair     Carrying     Estimated Fair  
(In Thousands)   Amount     Value     Amount     Value  
 
Assets:
                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 14,660     $ 14,660     $ 9,442     $ 9,442  
Investment securities held to maturity
    139,728       141,123       105,194       106,174  
Investment securities available-for-sale
    3,516       3,516       6,728       6,728  
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity
    143,424       150,851       162,430       169,210  
Mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale
    785       787       785       785  
Loans receivable — net
    515,809       540,410       498,391       512,512  
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
    16,096       16,096       16,096       16,096  
Accrued interest receivable
    3,367       3,367       3,719       3,719  
 
                               
Liabilities:
                               
Checking, Passbook, Club and NOW accounts
    77,498       77,498       61,404       61,404  
Money Market Demand accounts
    132,645       132,645       77,432       77,432  
Certificate of deposit accounts
    312,627       317,799       327,765       332,733  
Borrowings
    283,730       307,217       309,046       331,330  
Accrued interest payable
    1,475       1,475       1,606       1,606  
Limitations
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on many judgments. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
Fair value estimates are based on existing on and off-balance-sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments include deferred income taxes and premises and equipment. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.

 

page -17-


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This report contains certain forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company that are based on the beliefs of management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management. In addition, in those and other portions of this document, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “should” and similar expressions, or the negative thereof, as they relate to the Company or the Company’s management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current views of the Company with respect to future-looking events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected or intended. The Company does not intend to update these forward-looking statements.
The Company’s business consists of attracting deposits from the general public through a variety of deposit programs and investing such deposits principally in first mortgage loans secured by residential properties, commercial loans and commercial lines of credit in the Company’s primary market area. The Company also originates a variety of consumer loans, predominately home equity loans and lines of credit also secured by residential properties in the Company’s primary lending area. The Company serves its customers through its full-service branch network as well as through remote ATM locations, the internet and telephone banking.
Critical Accounting Policies and Judgments
The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared based on the application of certain accounting policies. Certain of these policies require numerous estimates and strategic or economic assumptions that may prove inaccurate or subject to variations and may significantly affect the Company’s reported results and financial position for the period or in future periods. Changes in underlying factors, assumptions, or estimates in any of these areas could have a material impact on the Company’s future financial condition and results of operations. The Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements: allowance for loan losses, and other-than-temporary security impairment.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses — The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The Company evaluates the need to establish allowances against losses on loans on a monthly basis. When additional allowances are necessary, a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings.
Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses consists of three key elements: (1) specific allowances for certain impaired loans; (2) a general valuation allowance on certain identified problem loans; and (3) a general valuation allowance on the remainder of the loan portfolio. Although we determine the amount of each element of the allowance separately, the entire allowance for loan losses is available for the entire portfolio.
Specific Allowance Required for Certain Impaired Loans: We establish an allowance for certain impaired loans for the amounts by which the collateral value, present value of future cash flows or observable market price are lower than the carrying value of the loan. Under current accounting guidelines, a loan is defined as impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
General Valuation Allowance on Certain Identified Problem Loans — We also establish a general allowance for classified loans that do not have an individual allowance. We segregate these loans by loan category and assign allowance percentages to each category based on inherent losses associated with each type of lending and consideration that these loans, in the aggregate, represent an above-average credit risk and that more of these loans will prove to be uncollectible compared to loans in the general portfolio.
General Valuation Allowance on the Remainder of the Loan Portfolio — We establish another general allowance for loans that are not classified to recognize the inherent losses associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, has not been allocated to particular problem assets. This general valuation allowance is determined by segregating the loans by loan category and assigning allowance percentages based on our historical loss experience, delinquency trends and management’s evaluation of the collectibility of the loan portfolio. The allowance may be adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, affect the collectability of the portfolio as of the evaluation date. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary lending areas, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are reevaluated quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current economic environment.

 

page -18-


Table of Contents

Other-than-Temporary Impairment of Investment Securities
Securities are evaluated periodically to determine whether a decline in their value is other-than-temporary. Management utilizes criteria such as the magnitude and duration of the decline, in addition to the reasons underlying the decline, to determine whether the loss in value is other-than-temporary. The term “other-than-temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospects for a near-term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment.
Changes in Financial Position for the Nine-Month Period Ended June 30, 2010
Total assets at June 30, 2010 were $867.1 million, an increase of $37.1 million for the nine-month period then ended. The increase was primarily due to an increase in loans receivable of approximately $17.4 million, an increase in cash and investments of approximately $36.5 million and an increase of prepaid and other assets of approximately $1.5 million. Also, there has been an increase in office property for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2010 of $1.7 million due to the opening of a new branch. These increases were offset by a decrease in mortgage-backed securities’ totaling $19.0 million, due to pay downs. The increase in prepaids and other assets was due to a $2.6 million prepayment balance of FDIC premiums at June 30, 2010.
Asset growth was primarily funded by growth in deposits during the nine-month period ended June 30, 2010. Total deposits increased by $56.1 million to $522.8 million. Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance also increased by $4.3 million due to the timing of property tax payments. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in borrowings of $25.3 million due to normal repayments for the period.
Comparisons of Results of Operations for the Three Month and Nine Month Period Ended June 30, 2010 with the Three Month and Nine Month Period Ended June 30, 2009
Net Interest Income
Net interest income was $4.7 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to $3.8 million for the comparable period in 2009. The increase in the net interest income for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 when compared to the same period in 2009 can be attributed to the increase in interest rate spread from 1.72% in 2009 to 2.07% in 2010, and the difference between the average interest earning assets in relation to the average interest earning liabilities in comparable periods. The increase in the net interest income for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2010 when compared to the same period in 2009 can attributed to the increase in interest rate spread from 1.85% in 2009 to 2.03% in 2010. Net interest income was $13.6 million for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to $12.4 million for the comparable period in 2009.
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income increased to $508,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 from $460,000 for the comparable period in 2009. Non-interest income increased to $1.5 million for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2010 from $955,000 for the comparable period in 2009. The increase in the nine month period is primarily due to an impairment write-down of four equity securities resulting in a loss of $449,000 in 2009. There were no write-downs in 2010.
Non-Interest Expenses
For the three-month period ended June 30, 2010, non-interest expenses increased by $92,000 or 3.0% to $3.2 million compared to $3.1 million for the same period in 2009. For the nine month period ended June 30, 2010, non-interest expenses increased by $818,000 or 9.42% to $9.5 million compared to $8.7 million for the same period in 2009. These increased costs are primarily due to the increase in normal salary and health care costs increases and expenses related to the opening of the new branch in February, 2010. Management believes that these are reasonable increases in the cost of operations after considering the impact of additional expenses related to the Company’s commercial loan department, business banking and opening a new branch. FDIC insurance expense decreased to $229,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 from $604,000 for the comparable period in 2009 because there was a special assessments imposed by the FDIC in 2010. FDIC insurance expense decreased to $682,000 for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2010 from $861,000 for the comparable period in 2009. The annualized ratio of non-interest expenses to average assets for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were 1.50%, 1.50% and 1.52%, 1.41%, respectively.

 

page -19-


Table of Contents

On May 22, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule imposing a 5 basis point special assessment on each insured depository institution’s assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009. The Bank’s special assessment totaling $460,000 was collected on September 30, 2009. Instead of imposing additional special assessments, the FDIC required all banks to prepay their estimated risk-based assessment for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012 on December 30, 2009. The Bank pre-paid $3,100,000 which is included in other assets and will be amortized over 36 months.
Income Taxes
The Company made provisions for income taxes of $500,000 and $1.4 million for the three-month and nine-month period ended June 30, 2010 respectively, compared to $246,000 and $930,000 for the comparable periods in 2009. These provisions are based on the levels of pre-tax income, adjusted primarily for tax-exempt interest income on investments.
In evaluating our ability to recover deferred tax assets, management considers all available positive and negative evidence, including our past operating results and our forecast of future taxable income. In determining future taxable income, management makes assumptions for the amount of taxable income, the reversal of temporary differences and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require us to make judgments about our future taxable income and are consistent with the plans and estimates we use to manage our business. Any reduction in estimated future taxable income may require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. An increase in the valuation allowance would result in additional income tax expense in the period and could have a significant impact on our future earnings.
Liquidity and Capital Recourses
For a financial institution, liquidity is a measure of the ability to fund customers’ needs for loans and deposit withdrawals. Harleysville Savings Bank regularly evaluates economic conditions in order to maintain a strong liquidity position. One of the most significant factors considered by management when evaluating liquidity requirements is the stability of the Bank’s core deposit base. In addition to cash, the Bank maintains a portfolio of short-term investments to meet its liquidity requirements. Harleysville Savings also relies upon cash flow from operations and other financing activities, generally short-term and long-term debt. Liquidity is also provided by investing activities including the repayment and maturity of loans and investment securities as well as the management of asset sales when considered necessary. The Bank also has access to and sufficient assets to secure lines of credit and other borrowings in amounts adequate to fund any unexpected cash requirements.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had $73.9 million in commitments to fund loan originations, disburse loans in process and meet other obligations. Management anticipates that the majority of these commitments will be funded within the next six months by means of normal cash flows and new deposits.
The Company invests excess funds in overnight deposits and other short-term interest-earning assets, which provide liquidity to meet lending requirements. The Company also has available borrowings with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh up to the Company’s maximum borrowing capacity, which was $465.0 million at June 30, 2010 of which $233.7 was outstanding at June 30, 2010.
The Bank’s net income for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 is $3.7 million compared to $3.4 million for the comparable period in 2009. This increased the Bank’s stockholder’s equity to $52.5 million or 6.08% of total assets. This amount is well in excess of the Bank’s minimum regulatory capital requirement.
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company has instituted programs designed to decrease the sensitivity of its earnings to material and prolonged increases in interest rates. The principal determinant of the exposure of the Company’s earnings to interest rate risk is the timing difference between the repricing or maturity of the Company’s interest-earning assets and the repricing or maturity of its interest-bearing liabilities. If the maturities of such assets and liabilities were perfectly matched, and if the interest rates borne by its assets and liabilities were equally flexible and moved concurrently, neither of which is the case, the impact on net interest income of rapid increases or decreases in interest rates would be minimized. The Company’s asset and liability management policies seek to decrease the interest rate sensitivity by shortening the repricing intervals and the maturities of the Company’s interest-earning assets. Although management of the Company believes that the steps taken have reduced the Company’s overall vulnerability to increases in interest rates, the Company remains vulnerable to material and prolonged increases in interest rates during periods in which its interest rate sensitive liabilities exceed its interest rate sensitive assets. The authority and responsibility for interest rate management is vested in the Company’s Board of Directors. The Chief Executive Officer implements the Board of Directors’ policies during the day-to-day operations of the Company.

 

page -20-


Table of Contents

Each month, the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) presents the Board of Directors with a report, which outlines the Company’s asset and liability “gap” position in various time periods. The “gap” is the difference between interest- earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities which mature or reprice over a given time period.
The CFO also meets weekly with the Company’s other senior officers to review and establish policies and strategies designed to regulate the Company’s flow of funds and coordinate the sources, uses and pricing of such funds. The first priority in structuring and pricing the Company’s assets and liabilities is to maintain an acceptable interest rate spread while reducing the effects of changes in interest rates and maintaining the quality of the Company’s assets.
The following table summarizes the amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities outstanding as of June 30, 2010, which are expected to mature, prepay or reprice in each of the future time periods shown. Except as stated below, the amounts of assets or liabilities shown which mature or reprice during a particular period were determined in accordance with the contractual terms of the asset or liability. Adjustable and floating-rate assets are included in the period in which interest rates are next scheduled to adjust rather than in the period in which they are due and fixed-rate loans and mortgage-backed securities are included in the periods in which they are anticipated to be repaid.
The passbook accounts, negotiable order of withdrawal (“NOW”) accounts, interest bearing accounts, and money market deposit accounts, are included in the “Over 5 Years” categories based on management’s beliefs that these funds are core deposits having significantly longer effective maturities based on the Company’s retention of such deposits in changing interest rate environments.
Generally, during a period of rising interest rates, a positive gap would result in an increase in net interest income while a negative gap would adversely affect net interest income. Conversely, during a period of falling interest rates, a positive gap would result in a decrease in net interest income while a negative gap would positively affect net interest income. However, the following table does not necessarily indicate the impact of general interest rate movements on the Company’s’ net interest income because the repricing of certain categories of assets and liabilities is discretionary and is subject to competitive and other pressures. As a result, certain assets and liabilities indicated as repricing within a stated period may in fact reprice at different rate levels.
                                         
    1 Year     1 to 3     3 to 5     Over 5        
    or less     Years     Years     Years     Total  
Interest-earning assets:
                                       
Mortgage loans
  $ 52,984     $ 58,837     $ 47,049     $ 190,769     $ 349,639  
Commercial loans
    31,631       8,345       20,903       14,664       75,543  
Mortgage-backed securities
    56,799       44,581       21,844       20,987       144,211  
Consumer and other loans
    62,555       15,287       7,030       11,023       95,895  
Investment securities and other investments
    93,880       47,460       23,266       5,748       170,354  
 
                             
 
Total interest-earning assets
    297,849       174,510       120,092       243,191       835,642  
 
                             
 
                                       
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                       
Passbook and Club accounts
                      3,469       3,469  
NOW and checking accounts
                      58,323       58,323  
Consumer Money Market Deposit accounts
    46,522                   55,009       101,531  
Business Money Market Deposit accounts
    23,335                   7,779       31,114  
Certificate accounts
    131,514       117,011       64,102             312,627  
Borrowed money
    21,829       86,697       42,733       132,471       283,730  
 
                             
 
                                       
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    223,200       203,708       106,835       257,051       790,794  
 
                             
 
                                       
Repricing GAP during the period
  $ 74,649     $ (29,198 )   $ 13,257     $ (13,860 )   $ 44,848  
 
                             
 
                                       
Cumulative GAP
  $ 74,649     $ 45,451     $ 58,708     $ 44,848          
 
                               
 
                                       
Ratio of GAP during the period to total assets
    8.61 %     -3.37 %     1.53 %     -1.60 %        
 
                               
Ratio of cumulative GAP to total assets
    8.61 %     5.24 %     6.77 %     5.17 %        
 
                               

 

page -21-


Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and regulations and are operating in an effective manner.
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

page -22-


Table of Contents

Part II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Not applicable.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Not applicable.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other information.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
         
No.
  31.1    
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
  31.2    
Certification of Chief Operating and Finance Officer
  32.0    
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating and Finance Officer

 

page -23-


Table of Contents

Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HARLEYSVILLE SAVINGS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
             
Date: August 13, 2010
  By:   /s/ Ronald B. Geib
 
Ronald B. Geib
   
 
      Chief Executive Officer    
 
           
Date: August 13, 2010
  By:   /s/ Brendan J. McGill
 
Brendan J. McGill
   
 
      Executive Vice President    
 
      Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer    

 

page -24-