e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-34603
Terreno Realty Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
27-1262675 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
16 Maiden Lane, Fifth Floor |
|
|
San Francisco, CA
|
|
94108 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (415) 655-4580
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The registrant had 9,258,430 shares of its common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding as
of November 10, 2010.
Terreno Realty Corporation
Table of Contents
1
Terreno Realty Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
51,433 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
43,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
7,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments in properties |
|
|
102,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments in properties |
|
|
101,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
91,475 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
194,435 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mortgage loans payable |
|
|
17,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
Security deposits |
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible liabilities |
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred underwriting fee payable |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
2,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
28,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock: $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 and no
shares authorized, respectively, and no shares issued
and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: $0.01 par value, 400,000,000 and 100,000
shares authorized, and 9,258,430 and 1,000 shares issued
and outstanding, respectively |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
170,505 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(4,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
165,804 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
194,435 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Terreno Realty Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 16, 2010 |
|
|
|
For the Three |
|
|
(Commencement of |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Operations) to |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
642 |
|
|
$ |
987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
2,936 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
1,557 |
|
|
|
1,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
|
5,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Interest expense, including amortization |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and expenses |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(2,704 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders per share |
|
$ |
(0.30 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding |
|
|
9,112,000 |
|
|
|
9,112,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Terreno Realty Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity
(in thousands except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional Paid- |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
in Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of February 16, 2010
(commencement of operations) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,792 |
) |
|
|
(4,792 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
9,112,000 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
182,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,240 |
|
Equity issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,200 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Issuance of restricted stock, net |
|
|
146,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
9,258,430 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
170,505 |
|
|
$ |
(4,792 |
) |
|
$ |
165,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Terreno Realty Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
February 16, 2010 |
|
|
|
(Commencement of |
|
|
|
Operations) to |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4,792 |
) |
Adjustments to net loss |
|
|
|
|
Straight-line rents |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Amortization of lease intangibles |
|
|
128 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
427 |
|
Deferred financing cost and mortgage premium amortization,
net |
|
|
72 |
|
Stock-based compensation amortization |
|
|
556 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
(210 |
) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
1,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(2,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for property acquisitions |
|
|
(82,407 |
) |
Deposits on property acquisitions |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Additions to buildings and improvements |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(82,481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
176,914 |
|
Payments on mortgage loans payable |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Payment of financing fees |
|
|
(447 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
176,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
91,474 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
91,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
58 |
|
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash transactions |
|
|
|
|
Deferred underwriting fee payable |
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
Offering costs payable |
|
$ |
115 |
|
Contribution of fixed assets by Terreno Capital Partners LLC |
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of cash paid for property acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of properties |
|
$ |
102,117 |
|
Assumption of mortgage loans payable |
|
|
(17,181 |
) |
Assumption of mortgage premiums |
|
|
(719 |
) |
Assumption of other assets and liabilities |
|
|
(1,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid for property acquisitions |
|
$ |
82,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Terreno Realty Corporation
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization
Terreno Realty Corporation (Terreno, and together with its subsidiaries, the Company) is
an internally managed Maryland corporation focused on acquiring, owning and operating industrial
real estate located in six major coastal U.S. markets: Los Angeles Area; Northern New Jersey/New
York City; San Francisco Bay Area; Seattle Area; Miami Area; and Washington, D.C./Baltimore. As of
September 30, 2010, the Company owned 27 buildings aggregating approximately 1.6 million square
feet.
The Company commenced operations upon completion of an initial public offering (IPO) of
8,750,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $20.00 per share and a concurrent private
placement of 350,000 shares of common stock at a price of $20.00 per share on February 16, 2010.
The net proceeds of the IPO and the concurrent private placement were approximately $169.8 million.
Prior to the completion of its IPO, the Company had no assets other than cash. The Company
intends to elect to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) under Sections 856 through
860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), commencing with its taxable year
ending December 31, 2010.
Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation. The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements
of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions
to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. In managements
opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair
presentation have been included. The interim condensed consolidated financial statements include
all of the Companys accounts and its subsidiaries and all intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the financial statement contained in the Companys 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the notes
thereto.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements
in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Investments in Real Estate. Investments in real estate are stated at cost, less accumulated
depreciation, unless circumstances indicate that the cost cannot be recovered, in which case, an
adjustment to the carrying value of the property is made to reduce it to its estimated fair value.
The Company also reviews the impact of above and below market leases, in-place leases and lease
origination costs for acquisitions and records an intangible asset or liability accordingly.
Property Acquisitions. Upon acquisition of a property, the Company estimates the fair value
of acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings and improvements) and intangible assets
and liabilities (consisting of the above and below market leases and the origination value of all
in-place leases). The Company determines fair values using estimated cash flow projections and
other valuation techniques and applying appropriate discount and capitalization rates based on
available market information.
The fair value of the tangible assets is based on the value of the property as if it were vacant.
The fair value of the above and below market leases is based on the present value of the difference
between the contractual amounts to be received pursuant to the acquired leases and the Companys
estimate of the market lease rates measured over a period equal to the remaining noncancelable term
of the leases. The capitalized values of above market leases (acquired above market leases) and
below market leases (acquired lease obligations) are amortized to rental revenue over the remaining
noncancelable term of the respective leases. The origination value of in-place leases (acquired
6
in-place leases) is based on costs to execute similar leases including commissions and other
related costs. The origination value of in-place leases also includes real estate taxes, insurance
and an estimate of lost rent revenue at market rates during the estimated time required to lease up the property from vacant to the
occupancy level at the date of acquisition.
Carrying values for financial reporting purposes will be reviewed for impairment on a
property-by-property basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
value of a property may not be fully recoverable. When the carrying value of a property or land
parcel is greater than its estimated fair value, based on the intended use and holding period, an
impairment charge to earnings will be recognized for the excess over its estimated fair value less
costs to sell. The intended use of an asset either held for sale or held for the long term, can
significantly impact how impairment is measured. If an asset is intended to be held for the long
term, the impairment analysis will be based on a two-step test. The first test measures estimated
expected future cash flows over the holding period, including a residual value (undiscounted and
without interest charges), against the carrying value of the property. If the asset fails the
test, then the asset carrying value will be measured against the lower of cost or the present value
of expected cash flows over the expected hold period. An impairment charge to earnings will be
recognized for the excess of the assets carrying value over the lower of cost or the present
values of expected cash flows over the expected hold period. If an asset is intended to be sold,
impairment will be determined using the estimated fair value less costs to sell. The estimation of
expected future net cash flows is inherently uncertain and relies on assumptions, among other
things, regarding current and future economic and market conditions and the availability of
capital. The Company determines the estimated fair values based on its assumptions regarding
rental rates, lease-up and holding periods, as well as sales prices. When available, current
market information is used to determine capitalization and rental growth rates. When market
information is not readily available, the inputs are based on the Companys understanding of market
conditions and the experience of the Companys management team. Actual results could differ
significantly from the Companys estimates. The discount rates used in the fair value estimates
will represent a rate commensurate with the indicated holding period with a premium layered on for
risk. If available, current comparative sales values may also be used to establish fair value.
Depreciation and Useful Lives of Real Estate and Intangible Assets. Depreciation and
amortization are computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related
assets or liabilities. The following table reflects the standard depreciable lives typically used
to compute depreciation and amortization. However, such depreciable lives may be different based on
the estimated useful life of such assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
Description |
|
Standard Depreciable Life |
Land
|
|
Not depreciated |
Building
|
|
40 years |
Building Improvements
|
|
5-40 years |
Tenant Improvements
|
|
Shorter of lease term or useful life |
Leasing Costs
|
|
Lease term |
Above/Below Market Leases
|
|
Lease term |
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents is comprised of cash held in a major
banking institution and other highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of
three months or less. Cash equivalents are generally invested in U.S. government securities,
government agency securities or money market accounts.
Revenue Recognition. The Company records rental revenue from operating leases on a
straight-line basis over the term of the noncancelable leases and maintains an allowance for
estimated losses that may result from the inability of its tenants to make required payments. If
tenants fail to make contractual lease payments that are greater than the Companys allowance for
doubtful accounts, security deposits and letters of credit, then the Company may have to recognize additional doubtful account charges in future periods. The Company monitors
the liquidity and creditworthiness of its tenants on an on-going basis by reviewing their financial
condition periodically as appropriate. Each period the Company reviews its outstanding accounts
receivable, including straight-line rents, for doubtful accounts and provides allowances as needed.
As of September 30, 2010, there was no allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company also records
lease termination fees when a tenant has executed a definitive termination agreement with the
Company and the payment of the termination fee is not subject to any conditions that must be met or
waived before the fee is due to the Company. If a tenant remains in the leased space following
7
the execution of a definitive termination agreement, the applicable termination will be deferred and
recognized over the term of such tenants occupancy.
Tenant expense reimbursement income includes payments and amounts due from tenants pursuant to
their leases for real estate taxes, insurance and other recoverable property operating expenses and
is recognized as rental revenues during the same period the related expenses are incurred. Tenant
expense reimbursement income recognized as rental revenues for the three months ended September 30,
2010 and for the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2010
was $113,000 and $186,000, respectively.
In connection with property acquisitions, the Company may acquire leases with rental rates above or
below the market rental rates. Such differences are recorded as an intangible lease asset or
liability, pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 805, Business Combinations, and
amortized to rental revenues over the life of the related leases. The total net impact to rental
revenues due to the amortization of above and below market rents, was a decrease of approximately
$71,000 and $128,000, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and for the
period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2010.
Deferred Financing Costs. Costs incurred in connection with financings are capitalized and
amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the related
loan. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, deferred financing costs were $401,000 and
$0, respectively, net of accumulated amortization.
Mortgage Premiums and Discounts. Mortgage premiums represent the excess of the fair value of
debt over the principal value of debt assumed in connection with property acquisitions. The
mortgage premiums are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt
instrument using the effective interest method. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the
net unamortized mortgage premiums were $715,000 and $0, respectively, and were included as a
component of mortgage loans payable on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Income Taxes. The Company intends to elect to be taxed as a REIT under the Code and intends
to operate as such beginning with its taxable year ending December 31, 2010. The Company expects
to have little or no taxable income prior to electing REIT status. To qualify as a REIT, the
Company must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to
distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income to its stockholders (which is computed
without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily
equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). As a REIT, the Company generally will not
be subject to federal income tax to the extent it distributes qualifying dividends to its
stockholders. If it fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal
income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates and generally will not be
permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable
years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the IRS grants it relief under
certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect the Companys net
income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, the Company believes it
is organized and operates in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820
also provides guidance for using fair value to measure financial assets and liabilities. ASC 820
requires disclosure of the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value
measurements fall, including measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities (Level 1), quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted
prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active (Level 2), and
significant valuation assumptions that are not readily observable in the market (Level 3).
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts payable and deferred underwriting fee payable approximated their carrying values because
of the short-term nature of these investments or liabilities. Cash equivalents of approximately
$88.7 million were invested in short-term investments that would qualify as a Level 2
classification under the fair value hierarchy. Based on borrowing rates available to the Company
at September 30, 2010, the carrying value and the estimated fair value of the mortgage loans
payable were both approximately $17.9 million.
8
Note 3. Concentration of Credit Risk. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company
to a significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The
Company may maintain deposits in federally insured financial institutions in excess of federally
insured limits. However, the Companys management believes the Company is not exposed to
significant credit risk due to the financial position of the depository institutions in which those
deposits are held.
Other real estate companies compete with the Company in its real estate markets. This results in
competition for tenants to occupy space. The existence of competing properties could have a
material impact on the Companys ability to lease space and on the level of rent that can be
achieved. The Companys top five tenants as of September 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rentable |
|
|
Base Rent |
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant |
|
Leases |
|
|
Square Feet |
|
|
Square Feet |
|
|
(000s) 1 |
|
|
Base Rent |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Home Depot |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
413,092 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
% |
|
$ |
1,874 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
% |
|
2 |
|
|
Precision Custom Coating |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
208,000 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
3 |
|
|
YRC, Inc. |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
121,551 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
4 |
|
|
Somerset Motors Partnership |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
62,400 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
5 |
|
|
Deeya Energy |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
52,675 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
857,718 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
% |
|
$ |
5,802 |
|
|
|
61.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Annualized base rent is calculated as monthly base rent per the leases, as of
September 30, 2010, multiplied by 12. |
Note 4. Investments in Real Estate. During the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of
operations) to September 30, 2010, the Company acquired 27 industrial buildings containing
approximately 1.6 million square feet. The total aggregate initial investment was approximately
$102.1 million, which includes approximately $1.5 million in below market leases and mortgage
premium intangible assets. The properties were acquired from unrelated third parties using
existing cash on hand, net of assumed mortgage loans payable, and were accounted for as asset
acquisitions.
Note 5. Debt. On March 24, 2010, the Company consummated a $50.0 million senior revolving credit
facility with KeyBank National Association as administrative agent, and KeyBanc Capital Markets
Inc. in its capacity as the lead arranger that matures on March 22, 2013 (the Facility). The
amount available under the Facility may be increased up to $150.0 million, subject to the approval
of the administrative agent and the identification of lenders willing to make available additional
amounts. Interest on the Facility will generally be paid based upon, at the Companys option,
either (i) LIBOR, subject to a floor of 1.50%, plus the applicable LIBOR margin or (ii) the
applicable base rate which is the greater of the administrative agents prime rate plus 1.00%,
0.50% above the fed funds effective rate, or thirty-day LIBOR (incorporating the floor of 1.50%)
plus the applicable LIBOR margin for LIBOR rate loans under the Facility. The applicable LIBOR
margin will range from 3.00% to 4.25%, depending on the ratio of the Companys outstanding consolidated indebtedness to the value of the Companys consolidated
gross asset value. The Facility includes a series of financial and other covenants that the Company
must comply with in order to borrow under the Facility. The Company has agreed to guarantee the
obligations of the borrower (a wholly-owned subsidiary) under the Facility. As of September 30,
2010, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Facility and no properties were in the
borrowing base. The Company was in compliance with its financial covenants at September 30, 2010.
The mortgage loans payable are collateralized by certain of the properties and require monthly
interest and principal payments until maturity and are generally non-recourse. During the period
from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2010, the Company assumed two
mortgage loans payable totaling approximately $17.9 million, including mortgage premiums of $0.7
million. These mortgage loans bear interest at a weighted average fixed annual interest rate of
5.19% and mature between 2015 and 2017.
9
The scheduled principal payments of the Companys credit facility and mortgage loans payable
as of September 30, 2010 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Mortgage Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility |
|
|
Payable |
|
|
Total Debt |
|
2010 (three months) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
Therafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,039 |
|
|
|
14,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,164 |
|
|
|
17,164 |
|
Unamortized net premiums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,879 |
|
|
$ |
17,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6. Stockholders Equity. The Companys authorized capital stock consists of 400,000,000
shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock. $0.01
par value per share. As of September 30, 2010, 9,258,430 shares of common stock were issued and
outstanding, including 146,430 non-vested restricted stock awards, and no shares of preferred stock
were issued and outstanding.
During the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) through September 30, 2010,
the Companys executive officers, employees and directors were granted an aggregate of 146,430
shares of restricted common stock with an aggregate initial value of approximately $2.9 million,
net of forfeitures. The vesting periods for the restricted shares range from one to five years.
In connection with the completion of the IPO on February 16, 2010, the Company issued 12,000 shares
of common stock to Terreno Capital Partners LLC, an entity owned by the Companys executive
officers, in exchange for the contribution of fixed assets to the Company with a net book value of
$240,000.
As of September 30, 2010, there were approximately 308,570 shares of common stock available for
issuance as restricted stock grants, unrestricted stock awards or performance shares under the
Companys 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. As of September 30, 2010, approximately 146,430 non-vested
stock awards were outstanding under the plan. The grant date fair value per share of restricted
stock awards issued during the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to
September 30, 2010 ranged from $19.65 to $20.00. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock
was determined using the initial public offering price of $20.00 for grants issued on February 16,
2010 (commencement of operations) and for all grants issued after the commencement of operations,
the Company uses the closing price of the Companys stock on the date of grant. As of September
30, 2010, the Company had approximately $2.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to restricted stock issuances, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted average
period of approximately 4.1 years.
Note 7. Net Loss Per Share. Pursuant to ASC 260-10-45, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities, unvested share-based payment awards
that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends are participating securities and are included in the computation of
earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method of computing earnings
per share allocates earnings per share for common stock and any participating securities according
to dividends declared (whether paid or unpaid) and participation rights in undistributed earnings.
Under the two-class method, earnings per common share are computed by dividing the sum of
distributed earnings to common stockholders and undistributed earnings allocated to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Our
nonvested restricted stock are considered participating securities since these share-based awards
contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends irrespective of whether the awards ultimately vest or
expire. The Company had no dilutive restricted stock awards outstanding for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and for the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to
September 30, 2010.
10
Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies
Deferred Underwriting Commissions. Underwriting commissions incurred in connection with the
Companys IPO are reflected as a reduction of additional paid in capital in the amount of $10.5
million. The underwriters deferred approximately $7.0 million of their underwriting commissions
until such time as the Company purchases assets in accordance with its investment strategy
described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 with an
aggregate price (including the amount of any outstanding indebtedness assumed or incurred by the
Company) at least equal to the net proceeds from the IPO. The deferred underwriting commissions
and other unpaid offering costs are reflected in deferred underwriting fee payable. As of
September 30, 2010, the Company had paid approximately $3.5 million in underwriting commissions.
Litigation. The Company is not involved in any material litigation nor, to its knowledge, is
any material litigation threatened against it. In the normal course of business, from time to
time, the Company may be involved in legal actions relating to the ownership and operations of its
properties. Management does not expect that the liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result
from such legal actions will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
Environmental Matters. The industrial properties that the Company owns and will acquire will
be subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws. Under these laws, courts and
government agencies have the authority to require the Company, as owner of a contaminated property,
to clean up the property, even if it did not know of or was not responsible for the contamination.
These laws also apply to persons who owned a property at the time it became contaminated, and
therefore it is possible the Company could incur these costs even after the Company sells some of
the properties it acquires. In addition to the costs of cleanup, environmental contamination can
affect the value of a property and, therefore, an owners ability to borrow using the property as
collateral or to sell the property. Under applicable environmental laws, courts and government
agencies also have the authority to require that a person who sent waste to a waste disposal
facility, such as a landfill or an incinerator, pay for the clean-up of that facility if it becomes
contaminated and threatens human health or the environment.
Furthermore, various court decisions have established that third parties may recover damages for
injury caused by property contamination. For instance, a person exposed to asbestos at one of our
properties may seek to recover damages if he or she suffers injury from the asbestos. Lastly, some
of these environmental laws restrict the use of a property or place conditions on various
activities. An example would be laws that require a business using chemicals to manage them
carefully and to notify local officials that the chemicals are being used.
The Company could be responsible for any of the costs discussed above. The costs to clean up a
contaminated property, to defend against a claim, or to comply with environmental laws could be
material and could adversely affect the funds available for distribution to our stockholders. The
Company generally expects to obtain Phase I environmental site assessments, or ESAs, on each
property prior to acquiring it. However, these ESAs may not reveal all environmental costs that
might have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, assets, results of operations or
liquidity and may not identify all potential environmental liabilities.
The Company utilizes local third party property managers for day-to-day property management and
will rely on these third parties to operate its industrial properties in compliance with applicable
federal, state and local environmental laws in their daily operation of the respective properties
and to promptly notify the Company of any environmental contaminations or similar issues.
As a result, the Company may become subject to material environmental liabilities of which it is
unaware. The Company can make no assurances that (1) future laws or regulations will not impose
material environmental liabilities on it, or (2) the environmental condition of the Companys
industrial properties will not be affected by the condition of the properties in the vicinity of
its industrial properties (such as the presence of leaking underground storage tanks) or by third
parties unrelated to the Company.
General Uninsured Losses. The Company carries property and rental loss, liability and
terrorism insurance. The Company believes that the policy terms, conditions, limits and
deductibles are adequate and
11
appropriate under the circumstances, given the relative risk of loss, the cost of such
coverage and current industry practice. In addition, the Companys properties are located, or may
in the future be located, in areas that are subject to earthquake and flood activity. As a result,
the Company has obtained or anticipates that it will obtain, as applicable, limited earthquake and
flood insurance on those properties. There are, however, certain types of extraordinary losses,
such as those due to acts of war, that may be either uninsurable or not economically insurable.
Although the Company has obtained coverage for certain acts of terrorism, with policy
specifications and insured limits that it believes are commercially reasonable, there can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to collect under such policies. Should an uninsured loss
occur, the Company could lose its investment in, and anticipated profits and cash flows from, a
property.
Contractual Commitments. Subsequent to September 30, 2010, the Company entered into three
contracts with third-party sellers to acquire industrial properties. The Company closed on one of
the properties under contract, consisting of one building located in South San Francisco
aggregating approximately 20,000 square feet for a purchase price of approximately $2.6 million.
There is no assurance that the Company will acquire the remaining properties under contract because
the proposed acquisitions are subject to a variety of factors, including the satisfaction of
customary closing conditions. The following table summarizes certain information with respect to
the remaining two properties the Company has under contract:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price (in |
|
|
Assumed Debt |
|
Market |
|
Buildings |
|
|
Square Feet |
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Los Angeles Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Miami Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern New Jersey/New York |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
86,000 |
|
|
|
6,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
Seattle Area |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
|
8,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
Washington, D.C/Baltimore |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Weighted Average |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
224,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,550 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the Securities Act) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act). We caution investors that forward-looking statements are based on
managements beliefs and on assumptions made by, and information currently available to,
management. When used, the words anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend, may,
might, plan, project, result, should, will, and similar expressions which do not relate
solely to historical matters are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements
are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance,
which may be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties, and factors that are
beyond our control. Should one or more of
these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect,
actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated, or projected. We expressly
disclaim any responsibility to update our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events, or otherwise. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on
past forward-looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made,
to anticipate future results or trends.
Some of the risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance, or
achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements
include, among others, the following:
|
|
|
the factors included under the heading Risk Factors in the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and in the Companys other public
filings; |
|
|
|
|
our limited operating history; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to identify and acquire industrial properties on terms favorable to us;
|
12
|
|
|
general volatility of the capital markets and the market price of our common stock; |
|
|
|
|
adverse economic or real estate conditions or developments in the industrial real
estate sector and/or in the markets in which we acquire properties; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to source off-market deal flow in the future; |
|
|
|
|
availability of investment opportunities in the industrial real estate sector; |
|
|
|
|
our reliance on third parties to property manage our industrial properties; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence upon tenants; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to comply with the laws, rules and regulations applicable to
companies, and in particular, public companies; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to manage our growth effectively; |
|
|
|
|
defaults on or non-renewal of leases by tenants; |
|
|
|
|
decreased rental rates or increased vacancy rates; |
|
|
|
|
tenant bankruptcies; |
|
|
|
|
increased interest rates and operating costs; |
|
|
|
|
declining real estate valuations and impairment charges; |
|
|
|
|
our expected leverage; |
|
|
|
|
estimates related to our ability to make distributions to our stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
our failure to obtain necessary outside financing; |
|
|
|
|
future debt service obligations; |
|
|
|
|
our failure to successfully hedge against interest rate increases; |
|
|
|
|
our failure to successfully operate acquired properties and operations; |
|
|
|
|
our failure to qualify or maintain our status as a REIT; |
|
|
|
|
possible adverse changes to tax laws; |
|
|
|
|
uninsured or underinsured losses relating to our properties; |
|
|
|
|
environmental uncertainties and risks related to natural disasters; |
|
|
|
|
financial market fluctuations; and |
13
|
|
|
changes in real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax
rates. |
Overview
Terreno Realty Corporation (Terreno, and together with its subsidiaries, we, us, our,
our Company, or the Company) is an internally managed Maryland corporation focused on
acquiring, owning and operating industrial real estate located in six major coastal U.S. markets:
Los Angeles Area; Northern New Jersey/New York City; San Francisco Bay Area; Seattle Area; Miami
Area; and Washington, D.C./Baltimore. We intend to invest in several types of industrial real
estate, including warehouse/distribution, flex (including light industrial and R&D) and
trans-shipment. We target functional buildings in infill locations that may be shared by multiple
tenants and that cater to customer demand within the various submarkets in which we operate. As of
September 30, 2010, we owned 27 buildings aggregating approximately 1.6 million square feet. We
intend to elect to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, commencing with
our taxable year ending December 31, 2010.
The following table summarizes the properties owned by us as of September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
Number of Buildings |
|
|
Square Feet |
|
|
% of Total Rentable Square Feet |
|
|
Occupancy Percentage as of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
Annualized Base Rent (000s)1 |
|
|
% of Total Annualized Base Rent |
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term (Years) |
|
Los Angeles Area |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
122,000 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,467 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
|
Miami Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern New Jersey/New York |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1,202,000 |
|
|
|
74.3 |
% |
|
|
88.3 |
% |
|
|
5,867 |
|
|
|
61.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
|
San Francisco Bay Area |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
293,000 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
76.0 |
% |
|
|
2,157 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
|
Seattle Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington, D.C/Baltimore |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Weighted Average |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
1,617,000 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
86.9 |
% |
|
$ |
9,491 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Annualized base rent is calculated as monthly base rent per the leases, as of
September 30, 2010, multiplied by 12. |
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
We commenced operations upon the completion of our initial public offering and the concurrent
private placement on February 16, 2010.
Revenue. We earned rental revenues of approximately $0.6 million and $1.0 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and for the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of
operations) to September 30, 2010, respectively, representing income from the acquisition of 27
buildings, which we acquired from March 26, 2010 to September 29, 2010. We recognized
straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles of $(71,000) and $(120,000) for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 and for the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of
operations) to September 30, 2010, respectively.
General and administrative expenses. We recorded general and administrative expenses of
approximately $1.2 million and $2.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and for
the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2010, respectively,
which represents overhead costs of the Company and includes stock compensation amortization of
approximately $226,000 and $556,000, respectively.
Acquisition costs. We recorded acquisition costs of approximately $1.6 million and $1.9
million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and for the period from February 16, 2010
(commencement of operations) to September 30, 2010, respectively, which consisted of costs incurred
in the pursuit and acquisition of properties.
We incurred a net loss of $2.7 million and $4.8 million for the three months ended September
30, 2010 and for the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to September 30,
2010, respectively.
14
Recent Developments
On February 16, 2010, we completed both our initial public offering of 8,750,000 shares of our
common stock and a concurrent private placement of an aggregate of 350,000 shares of our common
stock to our executive officers at a price per share of $20.00. The net proceeds of our initial
public offering were approximately $162.8 million after deducting the full underwriting discount of
approximately $10.5 million and other estimated offering expenses of approximately $1.7 million.
The underwriters agreed to forego the receipt of payment of $0.80 per share, or approximately $7.0
million in the aggregate, until such time as we purchase assets in accordance with our investment
strategy described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, with an
aggregate purchase price (including the amount of any outstanding indebtedness assumed or incurred
by us) at least equal to the net proceeds from our initial public offering (after deducting the
full underwriting discount and other estimated offering expenses payable by us), at which time, we
have agreed to pay the underwriters the remainder of the underwriting discount. We received net
proceeds of approximately $7.0 million from our concurrent private placement. In the aggregate, we
had approximately $169.8 million in cash available to execute our business strategy upon completion
of our initial public offering and the concurrent private placement on February 16, 2010.
During the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2010,
we acquired 27 industrial buildings containing approximately 1.6 million square feet. The total
aggregate investment was approximately $102.1 million, which includes approximately $1.5 million in
below market leases and mortgage premium intangible assets. The properties were acquired from
unrelated third parties using existing cash on hand, net of assumed mortgage loans payable. The
following table sets forth the industrial properties we acquired during the period from February
16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Cost |
|
Property Name |
|
Location |
|
Buildings |
|
|
Square Feet |
|
|
(in thousands) 1 |
|
Fortune/Qume |
|
San Jose, CA |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,550 |
|
Warm Springs I and II |
|
Fremont, CA |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
7,264 |
|
Lawrence |
|
South San Francisco, CA |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
|
9,899 |
|
Rialto |
|
San Bernardino, CA |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
122,000 |
|
|
|
12,152 |
|
Maltese |
|
Totowa, NJ |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
208,000 |
|
|
|
16,500 |
|
Middlebrook |
|
Bound Brook, NJ |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
581,000 |
|
|
|
28,302 |
|
130 Interstate |
|
South Brunswick, NJ |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
413,000 |
|
|
|
22,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
1,617,000 |
|
|
$ |
102,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Excludes acquisition costs totaling approximately $1.9 million. |
On March 24, 2010, we consummated a three-year, $50.0 million senior revolving credit facility
(the Facility) with KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, and KeyBanc Capital
Markets Inc., in its capacity as the lead arranger, to finance acquisitions and for working capital
requirements. We have agreed to guarantee the obligations of the borrower (a wholly-owned
subsidiary) under the Facility. There are currently no amounts outstanding under the Facility and
no properties are in the borrowing base.
During the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2010,
we assumed two mortgage loans payable totaling approximately $17.9 million, including mortgage
premiums of approximately $0.7 million. These mortgage loans bear interest at a weighted average
fixed annual interest rate of 5.19% and mature between 2015 and 2017.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The primary objective of our financing strategy is to maintain financial flexibility with a
conservative capital structure using retained cash flows, long-term debt and the issuance of common
and perpetual preferred stock to finance our growth. Over the long-term, we intend to:
15
|
|
|
limit the sum of the outstanding principal amount of our consolidated
indebtedness and the liquidation preference of any outstanding perpetual preferred
stock to less than 40% of our total enterprise value; |
|
|
|
|
maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio in excess of 2.0x; |
|
|
|
|
limit the principal amount of our outstanding floating rate debt to less than
20% of our total consolidated indebtedness; and |
|
|
|
|
have staggered debt maturities that are aligned to our expected average lease
term (5-7 years), positioning us to re-price parts of our capital structure as our
rental rates change with market conditions. |
We intend to preserve a flexible capital structure with a long-term goal to obtain an
investment grade rating and be in a position to issue unsecured debt and perpetual preferred stock.
Prior to attaining an investment grade rating, we intend to primarily utilize non-recourse debt
secured by individual properties or pools of properties with a targeted maximum loan-to-value of
60% at the time of financing, or recourse bank term loans and credit facilities. We may also
assume debt in connection with property acquisitions which may have a higher loan-to-value.
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by
operations, existing cash balances and, if necessary, short-term borrowings under the Facility. We
believe that our net cash provided by operations will be adequate to fund operating requirements,
pay interest on any borrowings and fund distributions in accordance with the REIT requirements of
the federal income tax laws. In the near-term, we intend to fund future investments in properties
with the net proceeds of our initial public offering and the concurrent private placement. We
expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, including with respect to other investments in
industrial properties, property acquisitions and scheduled debt maturities, through the cash we
have available from our initial public offering and the concurrent private placement and borrowings
under our credit facility and periodic issuances of common stock, perpetual preferred stock, and
long-term secured and unsecured debt. The success of our acquisition strategy may depend, in part,
on our ability to obtain and borrow under our credit facility and to access additional capital
through issuances of equity and debt securities.
On February 16, 2010, we completed our initial public offering with the issuance of 8,750,000
shares of our common stock at a price of $20.00 per share and a concurrent private placement of
350,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $20.00 per share. The net proceeds were
approximately $169.8 million.
As of September 30, 2010, our market equity capitalization was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Equity Capitalization as of September 30, 2010 |
Security |
|
Shares Outstanding1 |
|
Market Price 2 |
|
Market Value |
Common Stock |
|
|
9,258,430 |
|
|
$ |
18.22 |
|
|
$ |
168,688,595 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Includes 146,430 shares of unvested
restricted stock |
|
2 |
|
Closing price of our shares of common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on September
30, 2010 in dollars per share |
We have a $50.0 million Facility that matures on March 22, 2013. The amount available under
the Facility may be increased up to $150.0 million, subject to the approval of the administrative
agent and the identification of lenders willing to make available additional amounts. Interest on
the Facility will generally be paid based upon, at our option, either (i) LIBOR, subject to a floor
of 1.50%, plus the applicable LIBOR margin or (ii) the applicable base rate which is the greater of
the administrative agents prime rate plus 1.00%, 0.50% above the fed funds effective rate, or
thirty-day LIBOR (incorporating the floor of 1.50%) plus the applicable LIBOR margin for LIBOR rate
loans under the Facility. The applicable LIBOR margin will range from 3.00% to 4.25%, depending on
the ratio of our outstanding consolidated indebtedness to the value of our consolidated gross asset
value. The Facility includes a series of financial and other covenants that we must comply with in
order to borrow under the Facility. We have agreed to guarantee the obligations of the borrower (a
wholly-owned subsidiary) under the senior revolving credit facility. As of September 30, 2010,
there were no borrowings outstanding and no properties were in the
16
borrowing base under the
Facility. We were in compliance with our financial covenants under the Facility at September 30,
2010.
As of September 30, 2010, we had outstanding mortgage loans payable of approximately $17.9
million and held cash and cash equivalents totaling approximately $91.5 million.
The following table summarizes our debt maturities, principal payments and capitalization
ratios as of September 30, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Facility |
|
|
Payable |
|
|
Total Debt |
|
2010 (three months) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
Therafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,039 |
|
|
|
14,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,164 |
|
|
|
17,164 |
|
Unamortized net premiums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,879 |
|
|
$ |
17,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt-to-Gross Investments in Real Estate 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt-to-Total Market Capitalization 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Interest Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Maturity (years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Total debt-to-gross investments in real estate is calculated as total debt
divided by gross investments in real estate as of September 30, 2010. |
|
2 |
|
Total debt-to-total market capitalization is calculated as total debt divided
by market equity plus total debt as of September 30, 2010. |
Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of our accounting policies is set forth under Note 2 Significant Accounting
Policies to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements other than an operating lease for office
space.
Contractual Obligations
As described above, the full amount of the underwriting discount in connection with our
initial public offering was approximately $10.5 million. The underwriters agreed to forego the
receipt of payment of $0.80 per share, or approximately $7.0 million in the aggregate, until such
time as we purchase assets in accordance with our investment strategy described in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 with an aggregate purchase price
(including the amount of any outstanding indebtedness assumed or incurred by us) at least equal to
the net proceeds from our initial public offering (after deducting the full underwriting discount
and other estimated offering expenses payable by us), at which time, we have agreed to pay the
underwriters the remainder of the underwriting discount.
Subsequent to September 30, 2010, we entered into three contracts with third-party sellers to
acquire industrial properties. We closed on one of the properties under contract, consisting of
one building located in South San Francisco aggregating approximately 20,000 square feet for a
purchase price of approximately $2.6 million.
17
There is no assurance that we will acquire the remaining properties under contract
because the proposed acquisitions are subject to a variety of factors, including the satisfaction
of customary closing conditions. The following table summarizes certain information with respect to
the remaining two properties we have under contract:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price (in |
|
|
Assumed Debt |
|
Market |
|
Buildings |
|
|
Square Feet |
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Los Angeles Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Miami Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern New Jersey/New York |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
86,000 |
|
|
|
6,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
Seattle Area |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
|
8,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
Washington, D.C/Baltimore |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Weighted Average |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
224,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,550 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We use the following non-GAAP financial measure that we believe is useful to investors as a
key measure of our operating performance: funds from operations, or FFO. FFO should not be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance in accordance with GAAP.
We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real
Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), which defines FFO as net income (loss) (determined in
accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) from sales of property, plus depreciation and
amortization on real estate assets and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint
ventures (which are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis). We believe that presenting FFO
provides useful information to investors regarding our operating performance because it is a
measure of our operations without regard to specified non-cash items, such as real estate
depreciation and amortization and gain or loss on sale of assets.
The following table reflects the calculation of FFO reconciled from net loss available to
common stockholders for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and for the period from February
16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 16, 2010 |
|
|
|
For the Three |
|
|
(Commencement of |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Operations) to |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(2,704 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,792 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
Non-real estate depreciation |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations |
|
$ |
(2,491 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted FFO per common share |
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic and diluted common shares |
|
|
9,112,000 |
|
|
|
9,112,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency
exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market
sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business strategies, the primary market risk which we expect
to be exposed to in the future is interest rate risk. We may be exposed to interest rate changes
primarily as a result of debt used to maintain liquidity, fund capital expenditures and expand our
investment portfolio and operations. We will seek to limit the impact of interest rate changes on
earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. We expect that some of our
18
outstanding debt will have variable interest rates. We may use interest rate caps to manage our
interest rate risks relating to our variable rate debt. We expect to replace variable rate debt on
a regular basis with fixed rate, long-term debt to finance our assets and operations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30,
2010. The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Disclosure
controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its
principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter
how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their
objectives, and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit
relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of September 30, 2010, our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at
the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period
ended September 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
As of September 30, 2010, there were no material pending legal proceedings to which the
Company is a party or of which any of its properties is the subject, the determination of which the
Company anticipates would have a material effect upon its financial condition and results of
operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On February 9, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared effective the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-163016) in connection with the Companys initial
public offering, pursuant to which the Company registered and sold 8,750,000 shares of the
Companys common stock. The offering was completed on February 16, 2010. The Company will invest
the net proceeds of its initial public offering and concurrent private placement in industrial properties in accordance with its
investment strategy as described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and for general business purposes.
Prior to the full investment of the net offering proceeds in industrial properties, the
Company will continue to invest the net proceeds in interest-bearing short-term U.S. government and
government agency securities, which
19
are consistent with our intention to qualify as a REIT. These initial investments are expected to provide a lower net return than the Company will seek to
achieve from investments in industrial properties. As of September 30, 2010, we have used net
proceeds to acquire 27 industrial buildings for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $100.6
million, which includes assumed mortgage loans payable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
10.1
|
|
Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated as of September 30, 2010, between 130 Interstate Blvd., LLC and Terreno Realty LLC
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on October 1, 2010). |
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1**
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2**
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith. |
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terreno Realty Corporation
|
|
November 12, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ W. Blake Baird
|
|
|
|
W. Blake Baird |
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
November 12, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Michael A. Coke
|
|
|
|
Michael A. Coke |
|
|
|
President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
21
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
10.1
|
|
Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated as of September 30, 2010, between 130 Interstate Blvd., LLC and Terreno Realty
LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on October 1, 2010). |
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1**
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2**
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith. |
22