UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934

 

Filed by the Registrant þ

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

o  Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

o  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

þ  Definitive Proxy Statement

 

o  Definitive Additional Materials

 

o  Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

 

Key Energy Services, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

þ  No fee required.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Stockholder:

 

You are cordially invited to attend the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Key Energy Services, Inc. to be held at the Inn at the Ballpark, 1520 Texas Avenue, Houston, Texas at 9:00 a.m. (Central Daylight Time) on Thursday, May 19, 2011.

 

The notice of meeting and proxy statement that follow this letter describe the business to be conducted at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including the election of three Class II directors.

 

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we strongly encourage you to provide your proxy by telephone, the Internet or on the enclosed proxy card at your earliest convenience.

 

Thank you for your cooperation and support.

 

Sincerely,

Dick Alario
Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer

 

KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

1301 McKinney Street
Suite 1800
Houston, Texas 77010

 

NOTICE OF 2011 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

To Be Held on May 19, 2011

 

To Our Stockholders:

 

We invite you to our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be held at the Inn at the Ballpark, 1520 Texas Avenue, Houston, Texas, on Thursday, May 19, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. local time. At the meeting, stockholders will consider and act upon the following matters:

 

(1) To elect three Class II directors for the ensuing three years;

 

(2) To ratify the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year;

 

(3) To consider an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation as disclosed in these materials;

 

(4) To consider an advisory vote on whether an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation should be held every one, two or three years; and

 

(5) To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

 

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each of the proposals (1), (2) and (3) above and an annual vote for proposal (4) above.

 

Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 14, 2011, the record date for the 2011 Annual Meeting, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting. Your vote is important regardless of the number of shares you own. Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, we hope you will take the time to vote your shares. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote over the Internet, by telephone or by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. If your shares are held in “street name,” that is, held for your account by a broker or other nominee, you will receive instructions from the holder of record that you must follow for your shares to be voted.

 

Our stock transfer books will remain open for the purchase and sale of our common stock.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Kimberly R. Frye
Corporate Secretary

 

Houston, Texas

April 13, 2011

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on May 19, 2011:

 

This Proxy Statement, along with the Annual Report to security holders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, are available on our website at www.keyenergy.com by clicking on “Investor Relations” and then clicking on “2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.”

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

1301 McKinney Street
Suite 1800
Houston, Texas 77010

 

Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

 

To Be Held on May 19, 2011

 

This proxy statement contains information about the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Key Energy Services, Inc. We are holding the meeting at the Inn at the Ballpark, 1520 Texas Avenue, Houston, Texas, on Thursday, May 19, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., local time.

 

In this proxy statement, we refer to Key Energy Services, Inc. as “Key,” the “Company,” “we” and “us.”

 

We are sending you this proxy statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors (the “Board”) for use at the annual meeting.

 

We are mailing our 2010 Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2010 with these proxy materials on or about April 13, 2011.

 

 

 

Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” proxy statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of our Proxy Statement or Annual Report to Stockholders may have been sent to multiple stockholders in your household, unless we have received contrary instructions. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of either document to you if you request it by writing to or calling us at the following address or telephone number: 1301 McKinney Street, Suite 1800, Houston, Texas 77010, Attention: Investor Relations; (713) 651-4300. If you want to receive separate copies of our Proxy Statement or Annual Report to Stockholders in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for your household, you should contact your bank, broker or other nominee record holder, or you may contact us at the above address and telephone number.

 

This section provides information about the beneficial ownership of our common stock by our directors and executive officers. The number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by each person is determined under the rules of the SEC, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares that the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of any stock options or other rights. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has sole investment and voting power, or shares such power with his or her spouse,

with respect to the shares set forth in the following table. The inclusion in this table of any shares deemed beneficially owned does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership of those shares.

 

The address for each person identified below is care of Key Energy Services, Inc., 1301 McKinney Street, Suite 1800, Houston, Texas 77010.

 

Throughout this proxy statement, the individuals who served as our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) during fiscal year 2010, and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers are referred to as the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs.”

 

Set forth below is certain information with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 14, 2011 by each of our NEOs and each of our directors, as well as the directors and all executive officers as a group:

 

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth, as of March 14, 2011, certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of common stock by each person, other than our directors or executive officers, who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

 

 

 

 

 

Our Board is divided into three classes. One class is elected each year and members of each class hold office for three-year terms. Currently, the Board has set the number of directors at twelve. There are four Class I directors, four Class II directors and four Class III directors. At this year’s annual meeting, the terms of our Class II directors will expire. Mr. David J. Breazzano, a Class II director, has notified us that he will retire as a director and not stand for re-election to the Board. Mr. Breazzano’s decision was not a result of any disagreement with us. Following the annual meeting, the number of directors will be set at eleven. The Class II directors elected at this year’s annual meeting will serve three-year terms expiring at the annual meeting in 2014, until their successors are elected and qualified, or the earlier of their death, resignation or removal. The Class III and Class I directors will serve until the annual meetings of stockholders to be held in 2012 and 2013, respectively, until their respective successors are elected and qualified, or the earlier of their death, resignation or removal.

 

The persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote to elect as Class II directors William D. Fertig, Robert K. Reeves and J. Robinson West, unless you indicate on your proxy card that your shares should be withheld from one or more of the nominees or you return a signed proxy card without indicating your vote. Our Corporate Governance and Nominating (“CGN”) Committee has recommended, and the Board has nominated, each of the nominees for election as Class II directors. Each of the nominees is currently a member of the Board and was previously elected to the Board at the annual meeting of stockholders held in 2008.

 

Each of the nominees has indicated his willingness to serve, if elected. However, if any nominee should be unable to serve, the shares of common stock represented by proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee designated by the Board.

 

There are no family relationships between or among any of our officers and our directors. Robert K. Reeves, a Class II director, is an executive officer of one of our customers. Carter A. Ward, a Class III director, is the manager of the general partner of the indirect, majority owner of one of our customers. For additional information regarding these relationships, see the discussion below under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” under “Corporate Governance.”

 

Below are the names, ages and certain other information of each nominee for election as a Class II director and each other member of our Board, including information each director has given us about all positions he or she holds, his or her principal occupation and business experience for the past five years and the names of other publicly held companies of which he or she currently serves as a director or has served as a director during the past five years. In addition to the information presented below regarding each director’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board to the conclusion that he or she should serve as a director, we also believe that all of our directors exhibit high standards of integrity, honesty and ethical values. Information with respect to the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by

each director as of March 14, 2011 appears above under the heading “Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”

 

William D. Fertig, age 54, has been a member of the Board since April 2000. He has been Co-Chairman and Chief Investment Officer of Context Capital Management, an investment advisory firm, since 2002. From 1990 through April 2002, Mr. Fertig was a Principal and a Senior Managing Director of McMahan Securities, a broker dealer firm specializing in convertible securities, high-yield and derivative securities. Mr. Fertig previously served in various senior capacities at Drexel Burnham Lambert and Credit Suisse First Boston from 1980 through 1990. He holds a BS from Allegheny College and an MBA from the Stern Business School of New York University. We believe Mr. Fertig’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his investment and market expertise.

 

Robert K. Reeves, age 53, has been a member of the Board since October 2007. He is Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, an independent oil and gas exploration and production company. From 2004 to February 2007, Mr. Reeves served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs & Law and Chief Governance Officer of Anadarko. Prior to joining Anadarko, he served as Executive Vice President, Administration and General Counsel of North Sea New Ventures from 2003 to 2004, and as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Ocean Energy, Inc. and its predecessor companies from 1997 to 2003, both energy exploration and production companies. Since 2008, Mr. Reeves has served as a director of Western Gas Holdings, LLC, a subsidiary of Anadarko and general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP. He holds a BA and JD from Louisiana State University. We believe Mr. Reeves’ qualifications to serve on our Board include his experience in both legal and business matters as well as his upstream exploration and production experience.

 

J. Robinson West, age 64, has been a member of the Board since November 2001. He is the founder and CEO, and since 1984 has served as Chairman, of PFC Energy, strategic advisers to international oil and gas companies, national oil companies, and petroleum ministries. Previously, Mr. West served as U.S. Assistant Secretary of the Interior with responsibility for offshore oil leasing policy from 1981 through 1983. He was Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Economic Affairs from 1976 through 1977 and a member of the White House Staff from 1974 through 1976. He is currently a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the National Petroleum Council, and serves as Chairman of the Board of the United States Institute of Peace. Mr. West is also a director of Cheniere Energy, Inc., Magellan Petroleum Corporation and Stewart & Stevenson LLC. He holds a BA from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a JD from Temple University Law School. We believe Mr. West’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his extensive industry knowledge as well as his knowledge of legal matters being a trained attorney.

 

Richard J. Alario, age 56, has been a member of the Board since May 2004. Mr. Alario joined Key as President and Chief Operating Officer effective January 1, 2004. On May 1, 2004, he was promoted to Chief Executive Officer and appointed to the Board. He was elected Chairman of the Board on August 25, 2004. Prior to joining Key, Mr. Alario was employed by BJ Services Company, an oilfield services company, where he served as Vice President from May 2002 after OSCA, Inc. was acquired by BJ Services. Prior to joining BJ Services, Mr. Alario had over 21 years of service in various capacities with OSCA, an oilfield services company, most recently serving as its Executive Vice President. He currently serves as director and chairman of the Health, Safety, Security and Environmental Committee of the National Ocean Industries Association. He is a member of the U.S.-Arab Chamber of Commerce. He also was a director of Seahawk Drilling, Inc., serving as Chair of its Compensation Committee and as a member of its Corporate Governance Committee from August 2009 until February 2011. Mr. Alario holds a BA from Louisiana State University. We believe Mr. Alario’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his extensive experience of over 30 years in the oilfield services business, including his service as Key’s President and Chief Executive Officer.

Ralph S. Michael, III, age 56, has been a member of the Board since March 2003. He has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati Region, since December 2010. Mr. Michael was President and Chief Operating Officer of the Ohio Casualty Insurance Company from July 2005 until its sale in August 2007. From 2004 through July 2005, Mr. Michael served as Executive Vice President and Manager of West Commercial Banking for U.S. Bank, National Association and then as Executive Vice President and Manager of Private Asset Management for U.S. Bank. He also served as President of U.S. Bank Oregon from 2003 to 2005. From 2001 to 2002, he served as Executive Vice President and Group Executive of PNC Financial Services Group, with responsibility for PNC Advisors, PNC Capital Markets and PNC Leasing. He is a director of AK Steel Corporation; FBR Capital Markets Corporation; Arlington Asset Investment Corporation; Cincinnati Bengals, Inc.; and Xavier University. Previously, he served as a director for Integrated Alarm Services Group, Inc. from 2003 to 2007, and for Ohio Casualty Corporation from 2002 to 2005. He holds a BA from Stanford University and an MBA from the Graduate School of Management of the University of California Los Angeles. We believe Mr. Michael’s qualifications to serve on our Board include the broad business and finance background obtained through his more than 30 years experience working in financial services, much of which has been in executive management positions, as well as his extensive experience as a corporate board member, including his service on our and other companies’ audit committees, all of which have designated him as an “audit committee financial expert.”

 

Carter A. Ward, age 38, has been a member of the Board since November 2010. Mr. Ward is a Managing Director of ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC, a private equity firm focused exclusively on the energy industry headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts. Mr. Ward served on the board of directors of MYR Group Inc. from 2006 to December 2007 when he resigned in connection with the closing of a private placement in 2007 and was re-appointed to its board as the designee of Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc. in January 2008 until his resignation in June 2010. While serving on the MYR board of directors, Mr. Ward was a member of the Audit Committee and Nominating & Governance Committee. Prior to joining ArcLight in 2001, he was a Vice President at McManus & Miles, a boutique investment bank that specializes in financial advisory and private placement services for companies in the power and energy industries. Mr. Ward earned a BS in Operations Research & Industrial Engineering from Cornell University. We believe Mr. Ward’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his investment and market expertise.

 

Arlene M. Yocum, age 53, has been a member of the Board since October 2007. Ms. Yocum has been Executive Vice President, Managing Executive of Client Service and Distribution for PNC’s Asset Management Group since 2003. Prior to that, she served as an Executive Vice President of PNC’s Institutional Investment Group from 2000 to 2003. Ms. Yocum was a director of Protection One, Inc until 2010. She holds a JD from Villanova School of Law and a BA from Dickinson College. We believe Ms. Yocum’s qualifications to serve on our Board include her extensive business experience, including her investment and finance expertise and her designation as an “audit committee financial expert,” as well as her knowledge of legal matters being a trained attorney.

 

Lynn R. Coleman, age 71, has been a member of the Board since October 2007. As a partner in the firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom LLP, Mr. Coleman founded and led the firm’s energy practice for 20 years. He retired from the Skadden partnership in 2007. Prior to joining Skadden, Mr. Coleman served as the General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Energy and later as Deputy Secretary. From March 2008 through April 2010, Mr. Coleman served on the Supervisory Board of Lyondell Basell Industries, a large chemical company with operations in the U.S. and internationally. In May 2008, he also was appointed to the board of directors (non-executive Chair) of Total Holdings USA, Inc., a U.S. subsidiary of a large international oil company. In June 2010, Mr. Coleman was appointed to the board of directors of Defense Group Inc., a privately-owned corporation headquartered in Washington, D.C. In 2007 and 2008, he was a lecturer at the University of Virginia School of Law, offering a seminar on energy and environmental law. He has also been appointed adjunct professor at the University of Texas School of Law offering a similar seminar. He holds an LLB degree from the University of Texas and a BA from Abilene Christian College. We believe Mr. Coleman’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his extensive experience practicing law in the energy industry,

including his 20 years as a senior partner and leader of the energy practice at a prominent global law firm. He has wide ranging experience with energy transactions, litigation, government policy and regulation, in the U.S. and other countries. He has also served as managing partner and in similar management positions over other large groups of attorneys. His responsibilities included decisions concerning strategic planning, hiring, partnership advancement, attorney evaluations, direction of work of other attorneys and management of client relationships.

 

Kevin P. Collins, age 60, has been a member of the Board since March 1996. He has been Managing Member of The Old Hill Company LLC since 1997, a company he founded that provides corporate finance and management consulting services. From 1992 to 1997, he served as a principal of JHP Enterprises, Ltd., and from 1985 to 1992, as Senior Vice President of DG Investment Bank, Ltd., both of which were engaged in providing corporate finance and advisory services. Mr. Collins was a director of WellTech, Inc. from January 1994 until March 1996, when WellTech was merged into Key. Mr. Collins is also a director of PowerSecure International, Inc.; Antioch Company LLC; and Applied Natural Gas Fuels, Inc. (formerly PNG Ventures, Inc.). He holds BS and MBA degrees from the University of Minnesota. Mr. Collins is a CFA Charterholder. We believe Mr. Collins’ qualifications to serve on our Board include his extensive knowledge of Key and our industry, his analytical business background (he holds an MBA and is a Chartered Financial Analyst), his experience working on strategic transactions, as well as his lending and advisory experience with large financial institutions and his extensive experience serving on boards of directors, including his service on our and other companies’ audit committees.

 

W. Phillip Marcum, age 67, has been a member of the Board since March 1996. He was a director of WellTech, Inc. from January 1994 until March 1996, when WellTech was merged into Key. From October 1995 until March 1996, Mr. Marcum was the non-executory Chairman of the Board of WellTech. Previously, from January 1991 until April 2007, when he retired, he was Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of PowerSecure International, Inc. (formerly known as Metretek Technologies, Inc., and prior to that, known as Marcum Natural Gas Services, Inc.). Mr. Marcum also serves as Chairman of the Board of ADA-ES, a Denver, Colorado based company, and Chairman of the Board of Applied Natural Gas Fuels, Inc. (formerly PNG Ventures, Inc.), a West Lake Village, California based company. He is presently a principal in MG Advisors, LLC. He holds a BBA from Texas Tech University. We believe Mr. Marcum’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his experience serving on other public companies’ boards of directors and his extensive business knowledge working with other public companies in the energy industry, including his founding and running of Marcum Natural Gas Services, Inc., which has since grown into a public company known as PowerSecure International, Inc.

 

William F. Owens, age 60, has been a member of the Board since January 2007. He served as Governor of Colorado from 1999 to 2007, as Colorado State Treasurer from 1995 to 1999, and, prior to that, as a member of the Colorado State Senate and the Colorado State House of Representatives. Before his public service, Mr. Owens was on the consulting staff at Touche Ross & Co. (now Deloitte & Touche, LLP) and served as Executive Director of the Colorado Petroleum Association, which represented more than 400 energy firms doing business in the Rocky Mountains region. Currently, he is a Managing Partner of Front Range Resources, a Denver-based land and water development firm. He is also currently a Senior Advisor for PCL Construction Enterprises, Inc. Mr. Owens serves on the boards of Cloud Peak Energy Inc.; Keating Capital, Inc.; and FESCO Transport Group (a Russian listed company which owns and operates ports, railroads and container ships). Previously, from 2007 through 2009, he served on the board of Highlands Acquisition Corp. Mr. Owens holds a masters degree in Public Affairs from the University of Texas at Austin and earned his BS at Stephen F. Austin State University. He is also a Senior Fellow at the University of Denver’s Institute for Public Policy Studies. We believe Mr. Owens’ qualifications to serve on our Board include his wide-ranging background and experience in business, public policy, management and energy.

 

The Board of Directors believes that approval of the election of William D. Fertig, Robert K. Reeves and J. Robinson West to serve as Class II directors is in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders and therefore recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees.

 

This section describes the principal corporate governance guidelines and practices that we have adopted. Complete copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters and codes of business conduct described below are available on our website at www.keyenergy.com. Alternatively, you can request a copy of any of these documents by writing to: Investor Relations, Key Energy Services, Inc., 1301 McKinney Street, Suite 1800, Houston, Texas 77010. Our Board strongly believes that good corporate governance is important to ensure that Key is managed for the long-term benefit of our stockholders.

 

Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that address significant issues of corporate governance and set forth the procedures by which the Board carries out its responsibilities. Among the areas addressed by the Corporate Governance Guidelines are director qualifications and responsibilities, Board committee responsibilities, director compensation and tenure, director orientation and continuing education, access to management and independent advisors, succession planning and management development, and Board and committee performance evaluations. The CGN Committee is responsible for assessing and periodically reviewing the adequacy of these guidelines and recommending proposed changes to the Board, as appropriate. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted on our website at www.keyenergy.com. We will provide these guidelines in print, free of charge, to stockholders who request them.

 

Under applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, a director will only qualify as “independent” if our Board affirmatively determines that he or she has no direct or indirect material relationship with Key. In addition, all members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and CGN Committee are also required to meet the applicable independence requirements set forth in the rules of the NYSE and the SEC.

 

The Board has determined that, except for Mr. Alario, who serves as our President and CEO, and Mr. Ward, each of our current directors is independent within the meaning of the foregoing rules. Further, the Board considered Mr. Reeves’ position as an executive officer with one of our customers, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, and determined that the relationship between Anadarko and Key does not affect Mr. Reeves’ independence. The Board also considered Mr. Ward’s position as a member, and a managing director of the sole manager, of the general partner of the indirect, majority owner with one of our customers, Element Petroleum, LP, and determined that the relationship between Element and Key does not affect Mr. Ward’s independence. Nevertheless, because Mr. Ward is the managing director of ArcLight Capital Holdings, LLC, which is the sole manager of ArcLight PEF GP III, LLC, the general partner of ArcLight Energy Partners Fund III, L.P., which owns the membership interests of OFS Holdings Finance, LLC (“OFS Finance”), he may be deemed to beneficially own the 14,209,861 shares of the Company’s Common Stock beneficially owned by OFS Finance. As a result, the Board determined that Mr. Ward has a material relationship with Key that precludes a determination of independence under the applicable rules of the NYSE. For additional information regarding these relationships, see the discussion below under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”

 

We operate under a leadership structure in which our CEO also serves as Chairman of the Board. Our Board consists of Mr. Alario, the CEO and Chairman of the Board, and eleven other directors (ten other directors, following the annual meeting). Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that, unless the Chairman of the Board is an independent director, the Board will select a Lead Director from among the independent directors to act as a liaison between the non-management directors and management, chair the executive sessions of non-management directors and consult with the Chairman of the Board on agendas for

Board meetings and other matters. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide that non-management directors will meet in executive session on a regular basis without management present.

 

As described further below under “Board Committees,” we have five standing committees — the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Equity Award Committee, the CGN Committee and the Executive Committee. Other than the Executive Committee and the Equity Award Committee, on which Mr. Alario serves, each of the Board committees consists solely of independent directors, and each committee has a separate chair.

 

We believe that we are well-served by this leadership structure, which is a configuration commonly utilized by other public companies in the United States. We have a single leader for Key who sets the tone and has primary responsibility for our operations. We believe this structure provides clear leadership, not only for Key, but for our Board. General oversight of the business operations is provided by experienced independent directors with an independent Lead Director and separate committee chairs. We believe that having a combined Chairman / CEO, independent chairs for each of our Board committees (other than the Equity Award Committee and the Executive Committee) and an independent Lead Director provides the right form of leadership for Key and our stockholders.

 

However, our Board believes that no single organizational model will provide the most effective leadership structure in all circumstances. Accordingly, the Board may periodically consider whether the offices of CEO and Chairman should continue to be combined and who should serve in such capacities, and it retains the authority to separate the positions of CEO and Chairman if it deems appropriate in the future.

 

In considering whether to recommend any particular candidate for inclusion in the Board’s slate of recommended director nominees, our CGN Committee applies the criteria set forth in the guidelines contained in the Selection Process for New Director Candidates, which are available in the “Corporate Governance” section of our website, www.keyenergy.com. These criteria include the candidate’s integrity, business acumen, a commitment to understand our business and industry, experience, conflicts of interest and the ability to act in the interests of all stockholders. The CGN Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and no particular criterion is a prerequisite for each prospective nominee.

 

Our Board believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of its directors, considered as a group, should provide a composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow it to fulfill its responsibilities. The Selection Process for New Director Candidates tasks the CGN Committee with recommending director candidates who will assist in achieving this mix of Board members having diverse professional backgrounds and a broad spectrum of knowledge, experience and capability. At least once a year, the committee reviews the size and structure of the Board and its committees, including recommendations on Board committee structure and responsibilities. In accordance with NYSE requirements, the CGN Committee also oversees an annual performance evaluation process for the Board, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the CGN Committee. In this process, anonymous responses from directors on a number of topics, including matters related to experience of Board and committee members, are discussed in executive sessions at Board and committee meetings. Although the effectiveness of the policy to consider diversity of director nominees has not been separately assessed, it is within the general subject matter covered in the CGN Committee’s annual assessment and review of Board and committee structure and responsibilities, as well as within the Board and committee annual performance evaluation process.

 

Any stockholder entitled to vote for the election of directors may propose candidates for consideration for nomination for election to the Board. If the Board determines to nominate a stockholder-recommended candidate and recommends his or her election, then his or her name will be included in our proxy card for the next annual meeting. Stockholders also have the right under our bylaws to directly nominate director candidates, without any action or recommendation on the part of the CGN Committee or the Board, by following the procedures set forth under the heading “Stockholder Proposals for the 2012 Annual Meeting” below. Candidates nominated by stockholders in accordance with procedures set forth in the bylaws will not be included in our proxy card for the next annual meeting.

 

The Board’s role in the risk oversight process includes receiving regular reports from members of senior management on areas of material risk to Key, including operational, financial, legal and regulatory, and strategic and reputational risks. The full Board (or the appropriate committee in the case of risks that are under the purview of a particular committee) receives these reports from the appropriate “risk owner” within the organization to enable it to understand our risk identification, risk management and risk mitigation strategies. When a committee receives the report, the chair of the relevant committee reports on the discussion to the full Board during the committee reports portion of the next Board meeting. This enables the Board and its committees to coordinate the risk oversight role, particularly with respect to risk interrelationships. In addition, as part of its charter, the Audit Committee regularly reviews and discusses with management, our internal auditors and our independent registered public accounting firm, Key’s policies relating to risk assessment and risk management. The Compensation Committee also specifically reviews and discusses risks that relate to compensation policies and practices. During 2011, we continue to engage in a comprehensive enterprise risk management process by evaluating our existing and emerging risk exposures and then implementing appropriate design plans to manage such risks.

 

The Board held nine meetings, either in person or by teleconference, during 2010. During that year, each of our directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of Board meetings and meetings held by all committees on which he or she then served.

 

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that directors are expected to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All of our directors attended the 2010 annual meeting, and we expect substantially all of our directors to attend the 2011 annual meeting.

 

The Board has established five standing committees — Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Equity Award Committee, CGN Committee and Executive Committee. Current copies of the charters of each of the Audit, Compensation and CGN Committees are posted on the “Corporate Governance” section of our website, www.keyenergy.com.

 

The Board has determined that all of the members of each of the Board’s standing committees, other than the Executive Committee and Equity Award Committee, are independent under the NYSE rules, including, in the case of all members of the Audit Committee, the independence requirements contemplated by Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

The responsibilities of the Audit Committee include the following:

 

 

 

The current members of our Audit Committee are Messrs. Collins, Michael and Owens and Ms. Yocum. Ms. Yocum is the chair of the Audit Committee. All members of the Audit Committee meet the financial literacy standard required by the NYSE rules and at least one member qualifies as having accounting or related financial management expertise under the NYSE rules. In addition, as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC adopted rules requiring that each public company disclose whether or not its audit committee has an “audit committee financial expert” as a member. An “audit committee financial expert” is defined as a person who, based on his or her experience, satisfies all of the following attributes:

 

 

The Board has determined that Ms. Yocum and Mr. Michael satisfy the definition of “audit committee financial expert,” and designated each of Ms. Yocum and Mr. Michael as an “audit committee financial expert.”

 

The Audit Committee held eleven meetings in 2010. In addition, members of the Audit Committee speak regularly with our independent registered public accounting firm and separately with the members of management to discuss any matters that the Audit Committee or these individuals believe should be discussed, including any significant issues or disagreements concerning our accounting practices or financial statements. For further information, see “Report of the Audit Committee” below.

 

The Audit Committee has the authority to retain legal, accounting or other experts that it determines to be necessary or appropriate to carry out its duties. We will provide the appropriate funding, as determined by the Audit Committee, for the payment of compensation to our independent registered public accounting firm and to any legal, accounting or other experts retained by the Audit Committee and for the payment of the Audit Committee’s ordinary administrative expenses necessary and appropriate for carrying out the duties of the Audit Committee.

 

The Audit Committee charter provides that no member of the Audit Committee shall simultaneously serve on the audit committees of more than three public companies (including our Audit Committee) unless the Board has determined that such simultaneous service would not impair his or her ability to effectively serve on our Audit Committee. Mr. Michael currently serves on our Audit Committee and the audit committees of the following other three public companies: AK Steel Corporation; Arlington Asset Investment Corporation; and FBR Capital Markets Corporation. The Board determined, prior to his becoming a member of FBR Capital Markets’ audit committee, that Mr. Michael’s simultaneous service on four public companies’ audit committees would not impair his ability to effectively serve on our Audit Committee.

 

The charter of our Audit Committee can be accessed on the “Corporate Governance” section of our website, www.keyenergy.com.

 

The Compensation Committee has responsibility for establishing, implementing and continually monitoring adherence with our compensation philosophy. The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include the following:

 

 

The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Breazzano, Fertig, Marcum, Reeves and West, all of whom are independent, non-management members of the Board. Mr. Reeves is the chair of the Compensation Committee. No Compensation Committee member participates in any of our employee compensation programs other than the Key Energy Services, Inc. 2009 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan, and prior grants under the Key Energy Services, Inc. 2007 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan and the Key Energy Group, Inc. 1997 Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee held seven meetings in 2010.

 

The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to select, retain, terminate, and approve the fees and other retention terms of special counsel or other experts or consultants, as it deems appropriate in order to carry out its responsibilities, without seeking approval of the Board or management. With respect to compensation consultants retained to assist in the evaluation of director, CEO or executive officer compensation, this authority is vested solely in the Compensation Committee.

 

The charter of our Compensation Committee can be accessed on the “Corporate Governance” section of our website, www.keyenergy.com.

 

Mr. Alario is the chair and sole member of the Equity Award Committee. Subject to certain exceptions and limitations, the Compensation Committee has delegated to the Equity Award Committee the ability to grant equity awards under our equity incentive plans to those employees who are not executive officers,

usually in connection with new hires and promotions. During 2010, the Compensation Committee authorized the Equity Award Committee to make grants up to an aggregate of 150,000 stock options and/or shares of restricted stock to eligible employees during this calendar year, but no more than 20,000 per grant or in the aggregate to any single employee during a twelve-month period. For 2011, the Compensation Committee reset this authority, which terminates on January 27, 2012. Reports of equity grants made by the Equity Award Committee are included in the materials presented at the Compensation Committee’s regularly scheduled meetings.

 

The responsibilities of the CGN Committee include the following:

 

 

The CGN Committee is composed entirely of independent directors, as that term is defined by applicable NYSE rules. The current members of the CGN Committee are Messrs. Fertig, Breazzano, Coleman, Marcum and West. Mr. Fertig is the chair of the CGN Committee. The CGN Committee held six meetings in 2010.

 

The CGN Committee has the authority and funding to retain counsel and other experts or consultants, including the sole authority to select, retain and terminate any search firm to be used to identify director candidates and to approve the search firm’s fees and other retention terms.

 

The charter of our CGN Committee can be accessed on the “Corporate Governance” section of our website, www.keyenergy.com.

 

The Executive Committee’s membership consists of the CEO and Chairman of the Board, the Lead Director and the chair of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and CGN Committee. The Executive Committee only acts in place of the Board in situations where it may be impracticable to assemble the full Board to consider a matter on a timely basis. Any action by the Executive Committee will be promptly reported to the full Board. Currently, Messrs. Alario, Fertig, Michael and Reeves and Ms. Yocum serve on the Executive Committee. The Executive Committee held three meetings in 2010.

 

Our Code of Business Conduct applies to all of our employees, including our CEO, CFO and senior financial and accounting officers. In addition, we have a Code of Business Conduct for Members of the Board of Directors. Among other matters, the Code of Business Conduct and the Code of Business Conduct for Members of the Board of Directors establish policies to deter wrongdoing and to promote both honest and ethical conduct, including ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest, compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in public communications and prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Business Conduct. We also have an Ethics Committee, composed of members of management, which administers our ethics and compliance program with respect to our employees. In addition, we provide an ethics line for reporting any violations on a confidential basis. Copies of our Code of Business Conduct and the Code of Business Conduct for Members of the Board of Directors are available on our website at www.keyenergy.com. We will post on our Internet website all waivers to or amendments of our Code of Business Conduct and the Code of Business Conduct for Members of the Board of Directors that are required to be disclosed by applicable law and the NYSE listing standards.

 

The Audit Committee has reviewed the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and has discussed these financial statements with the Company’s management and independent registered public accounting firm.

 

The Audit Committee has also received from, and discussed with, Grant Thornton LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, various communications that the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is required to provide to the Audit Committee, including the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (Communication with Audit Committees).

 

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm also provided the Audit Committee with the written disclosures required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526 (Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence). The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence from Key.

 

Based on its discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, and its review of the representations and information provided by management and the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors of the Company that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

By the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

 

Arlene M. Yocum, Chair
Kevin P. Collins
Ralph S. Michael, III
William F. Owens

 

Below are the names, ages and certain other information on each of our executive officers, other than Mr. Alario, whose information is provided above.

 

Newton W. “Trey” Wilson III, age 60, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Wilson was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer on June 25, 2008. He joined Key as Senior Vice President and General Counsel on January 24, 2005 and was later appointed Secretary effective January 24, 2005. Previously, Mr. Wilson served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Forest Oil Corporation, an oil and gas exploration company which he joined in November 2000. Prior to joining Forest Oil, Mr. Wilson was a consultant to the oil industry as well as an executive for two oil and gas companies, Union Texas Petroleum and Transco Energy Company. He also serves as a director for IROC Energy Services Corp., an Alberta-based oilfield services company in which Key has an equity investment, as well as OOO Geostream Services Group and AlMansoori-Key Energy Services, LLC, both international oilfield services joint venture entities of Key based in the Russian Federation and the United Arab Emirates, respectively. Mr. Wilson received a BBA from Southern Methodist University and a JD from the University of Texas.

 

T. M. “Trey” Whichard III, age 52, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Whichard joined Key as its Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on March 26, 2009. Mr. Whichard was retired prior to joining Key. Prior to his retirement in early 2006, he was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for BJ Services Company. Mr. Whichard served in various financial capacities at BJ Services from 1989 until his retirement in 2006, including Vice President, Treasurer and Tax Director. He received a BBA in Accounting from Sam Houston State University.

 

Kim B. Clarke, age 55, Senior Vice President, Administration and Chief People Officer. Ms. Clarke joined Key on November 22, 2004 as Vice President and Chief People Officer. She was elected as an executive

officer in January 2005 and, since January 1, 2006, she has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer (as of March 25, 2009, her title was changed to Senior Vice President, Administration and Chief People Officer). Her responsibilities include Human Resources, Health, Safety and Environmental as well as Information Technology. Previously, from 1999 to 2004, Ms. Clarke served as Vice President of Human Resources for GC Services, a teleservicing and collection services company. Prior to that, she served in a number of senior level human resource roles for Browning Ferris Industries (BFI), a waste management company, from 1988 to 1997 and as BFI’s Vice President Human Resources from 1997 to 1999. Ms. Clarke’s 30 years of work experience also includes industry experience with Baker Service Tools and National Oilwell. Ms. Clarke holds a BS degree from the University of Houston.

 

Kimberly R. Frye, age 42, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Ms. Frye joined Key in October 2002 as Associate General Counsel and was promoted to her current position as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in July 2008. Prior to joining Key, Ms. Frye was an attorney with Porter & Hedges, L.L.P. where her practice focused principally on corporate and securities law. Prior to attending law school, Ms. Frye worked as a federal bank examiner for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Ms. Frye received her BS in Corporate Finance and Investment Management from the University of Alabama in 1991 and her JD from the University of Houston in 1997.

 

J. Marshall Dodson, age 40, Vice President and Treasurer. Mr. Dodson joined Key as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer on August 22, 2005 and served in that capacity until being appointed Vice President and Treasurer on June 8, 2009. From February 6, 2009 until Mr. Whichard’s election as Key’s new Chief Financial Officer on March 26, 2009, Mr. Dodson served in the additional capacity as interim principal financial officer. Prior to joining Key, Mr. Dodson served in various capacities at Dynegy, Inc., an electric energy production and services company, from 2002 to August 2005, most recently serving as Managing Director and Controller, Dynegy Generation since 2003. Mr. Dodson started his career with Arthur Andersen LLP in Houston, Texas in 1993, serving most recently as a senior manager prior to joining Dynegy, Inc. He also currently serves as a director of OOO Geostream Services Group, an oilfield services company in the Russian Federation in which Key holds a 50% interest. Mr. Dodson is a Certified Public Accountant and received a BBA from the University of Texas at Austin in 1993.

 

Don D. Weinheimer, age 52, Senior Vice President, Strategy, Marketplace Development and Technology. Mr. Weinheimer joined Key on October 2, 2006 as Senior Vice President of Business Development, Technology and Strategic Planning. On October 1, 2008, his role and title changed to Senior Vice President of Product Development, Strategic Planning and Quality, on November 1, 2009, he was promoted to Senior Vice President, Production Services, and in August 2010 his role changed to Senior Vice President, Strategy, Marketplace Development and Technology. Prior to joining Key, Mr. Weinheimer was with Halliburton Company, a global energy services company, serving as Vice President of Technology Globalization within its Energy Services Group from July 2006 to October 2006 and as Vice President of Innovation and Marketing in its Production Optimization Division from July 2004 to June 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Weinheimer served in various capacities within Halliburton and divisions of Halliburton since 1981. Mr. Weinheimer has over 28 years of industry experience, including international operational and business development experience in both the Middle East and Algeria. Mr. Weinheimer also currently serves as a director of OOO Geostream Services Group and AlMansoori-Key Energy Services, LLC, both international oilfield services joint venture entities of Key based in the Russian Federation and the United Arab Emirates, respectively. Mr. Weinheimer earned his BS degree in Agricultural Engineering from Texas A&M University.

 

Dennis C. Douglas, age 57, Senior Vice President, Fluid Management Services. Mr. Douglas joined Key as Operations Manager for the L.A. Basin in California in February 1997 in connection with Key’s acquisition of Dawson Production Services, Inc. He was promoted to Sales Manager for Key’s California Division in May 1998 and served in that capacity until he was promoted to Division Manager for California in October 2000. In June 2008, he was promoted to Group Vice President of Key’s Western Division until his promotion to Senior Vice President of Key’s U.S. Marketplace in October 2008. Mr. Douglas served in that capacity until he was promoted to Senior Vice President, Fluid Management Services on November 1, 2009. Prior to joining Key, Mr. Douglas worked during 1997 at Dawson Production Services, Inc. as Operations Manager. From 1993 to 1997, he worked

at Nabors Well Service as Rig Supervisor. Prior to that, Mr. Douglas managed Homco’s rental and fishing tool division in California from 1989 until Homco merged with Weatherford International in 1993.

 

Guillermo A. Capacho, age 49, Senior Vice President, International. Mr. Capacho joined Key as Vice President, International Operations, Western Hemisphere in January 2010. Mr. Capacho’s role changed to Senior Vice President, International Operations in August of 2010 and his current position is Senior Vice President, International. Mr. Capacho brings over 24 years of industry experience and international operations knowledge, working previously with Halliburton where he held a variety of positions, most recent positions such as: Senior Global Business Development and Commercialization Manager, Global Drilling Technology Manager, Country Vice- President for Halliburton of Mexico, Regional Operations Manager for Latin America and Business Development Manager for Latin America in multiple product service lines, like Directional Drilling, Wireline and Perforating, and Security Drilling Bits. Mr. Capacho received a BA in Petroleum Engineering from University Industrial of Santander Colombia and a MBA from PLEP Halliburton/Texas A&M, College Station/Houston, TX.

 

Richard C. Jacquier, age 54, Vice President, Intervention Services. Mr. Jacquier was promoted to his current position of Vice President, Intervention Services at Key in September 2010 to lead Key’s Coiled-Tubing business. Prior to this promotion, he served as Senior Director of Special Projects for Key since May 2010. Before joining Key, Mr. Jacquier spent 30 years at Halliburton working field, area management, and global operations’ manager roles in Halliburton’s Production Enhancement product-service line both domestically and internationally. Prior to departing Halliburton, he held the position of director over their Global HSEQ organization. Mr. Jacquier has a Bachelors of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from California State University at Sacramento and has completed Lean and Green Belt Six Sigma training through Villanova University.

 

F. Doug McDonald, age 57, Vice President, Business Development. Mr. McDonald joined Key in February 2008 and has served as an officer in the Company’s fishing and rental services segment. Beginning in November 2009, Mr. McDonald served in various capacities in business development and effective February 2011, Mr. McDonald was appointed to his current position of Vice President, Business Development. Prior to joining Key, from September 1984 until January 2008, he worked at Weatherford International, an oil and gas services and equipment company, the last three years of which he served in the position of Manager of U.S. Managed Accounts. He is also a veteran United States Army officer. Mr. McDonald received his BA from the University of Louisiana at Monroe.

 

Thomas R. Pipes, age 55, Vice President, Market Development. Mr. Pipes originally joined Key in 1982 and has served in various positions with the Company, including responsibility for the Company’s Permian Basin operations, business development well service rig operations and, most recently, industry relations. Effective February 2011, he was appointed to his current position of Vice President, Market Development.

 

Jeffrey S. Skelly, age 53, Senior Vice President, Rig Services. Mr. Skelly joined Key as its Senior Vice President, Rig Services effective on June 21, 2010. Mr. Skelly’s previous role was that of Chief Operating Officer at GEO Dynamics, a technology company focused on perforating systems and solutions, from November 2007 to January 2010. Previously he was President for Expro Groups Western Hemisphere Operations from January 2005 to June 2007. Jeff has also served in several roles at Halliburton including Global Manufacturing Operations Manager, Global Product Manager for Logging and Perforating, and Regional Manager for the Middle East. Jeff began his career in the oil and gas services business after earning a B.S. Degrees in Civil Engineering and Ocean Engineering from Florida Institute of Technology. After college, he joined Schlumberger and held various positions at Schlumberger over the next several years including Field Engineer, Technical Manager, Area Operations Manager, and Sales Manager.

 

Ike C. Smith, age 36, Vice President and Controller. Mr. Smith has been Vice President and Controller since June 2009, and serves as principal accounting officer. Previously, from January 2009 to June 2009, Mr. Smith served as Vice President of Audit Services, overseeing Key’s internal audit function. Prior to that, from the time Mr. Smith joined Key on January 2, 2008 through January 2, 2009, he served as Vice President of Finance, Internal Controls. Before joining Key, he worked for Horizon Offshore, Inc., a marine construction company providing pipeline installation and platform assembly and salvage to the oil and gas industry, where he served as Corporate Controller from August 2004 through December 2007 and as SEC Reporting Manager from June 2002 through August 2004. He also worked at Arthur Andersen LLP from 1998

until 2002 in the Assurance and Business Advisory practice. Mr. Smith is a CPA and received a BBA in Accounting from Sam Houston State University in 1998.

 

Patrick N. Williamson, age 49, Vice President, Fishing and Rental Services. Mr. Williamson was appointed Vice President of Fishing and Rental Services on June 5, 2010. Prior to joining Key, he served as the Global Productline Manager of Drilling Products for International Tubular Services, Aberdeen, Scotland. During his tenure, he assisted in the design and commercialization of a Single Trip Casing Exit System, currently being utilized in the global drilling market. In 2006, Mr. Williamson joined Smith International as the leader of the account management team, Houston, Texas. Prior to joining Smith International, he served for 24 years in various positions with Weatherford, International. During his tenure at Weatherford, Mr. Williamson received the BP Technical Achievement Award 1998 for the successful design and installation of a Multi-lateral System in Southern England, Wytch Farm. In March 2000, his team was granted a U.S. patent for a component designed to be used in the implementation of Multi-laterals systems. In his remaining years at Weatherford, Mr. Williamson served as the BP Account Manager for the North America Business Unit, providing leadership across multiple product lines.

 

Effective December 1, 2006, Grant Thornton LLP was engaged as our independent registered public accounting firm. The following table sets forth the fees for the fiscal period to which the fees relate:

 

 

 

 

Audit fees consist of professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements, the audit of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and the reviews of the quarterly financial statements. This category also includes fees for issuance of comfort letters, consents, assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC, statutory audit fees, work done by tax professionals in connection with the audit and quarterly reviews and accounting consultations and research work necessary to comply with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Fees are generally presented in the period to which they relate as opposed to the period in which they were billed. Other services performed include certain advisory services and do not include any fees for financial information systems design and implementation.

 

The Audit Committee has an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy. The policy requires the Audit Committee to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the policy, the Audit Committee establishes the audit, audit-related, tax and all other services that have the approval of the Audit Committee. The term of any such pre-approval is twelve months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee adopts a shorter period and so states. The Audit Committee will periodically review the list of pre-approved services and will add to or subtract from the list of pre-approved services from time to time. The Audit Committee will also establish annually pre-approval fee levels or budgeted

amounts for all services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. Any proposed services exceeding these levels or amounts will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

 

The Audit Committee has delegated to its chair the authority to pre-approve services, not previously pre-approved by the Audit Committee, that involve aggregate payments (with respect to each such service or group of related services) of $50,000 or less. The chair will report any such pre-approval to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

 

The policy contains procedures for a determination by the CFO that proposed services are included within the list of services that have received pre-approval of the Audit Committee. Proposed services that require specific approval by the Audit Committee must be submitted jointly by the independent registered public accounting firm and the CFO and must include backup statements and documentation regarding the proposed services and whether the proposed services are consistent with SEC and NYSE rules on auditor independence.

 

We have an Affiliate Transaction Policy which requires advance review and approval of any proposed transactions (other than employee or director compensation) between Key and an affiliate of Key. For this purpose, affiliates include major stockholders, directors and executive officers and members of their immediate family (including in-laws), nominees for director, and affiliates of the foregoing persons, as determined in accordance with SEC rules. In determining whether to approve an affiliate transaction, the Board will use such processes it deems reasonable in light of the circumstances, such as the nature of the transaction and the affiliate involved, which may include an analysis of any auction process involved, an analysis of market comparables, use of an appraisal, obtaining an investment banking opinion or a review by independent counsel. The policy requires the Board to determine that, under all of the circumstances, the covered transaction is in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of Key, and requires approval of covered transactions by a majority of the Board (other than interested directors). The Board, in its discretion, may delegate this authority to the CGN Committee or another committee comprised solely of independent directors, as appropriate.

 

In addition, we require on an annual basis that our directors and executive officers each complete a Directors and Officers Questionnaire to describe certain information and relationships (including those involving their immediate family members) that may be required to be disclosed in our Form 10-K, annual proxy statement and other filings with the SEC. Director nominees and newly appointed executive officers must complete the questionnaire at or before the time they are nominated or appointed. If a change occurs in certain information required to be disclosed in the questionnaire after it is completed, the director or executive officer must immediately report this to Key throughout the year, including changes in relationships between immediate family members and Key, compensation paid from third parties for services rendered to Key not otherwise disclosed, interests in certain transactions and facts that could affect director independence. Directors are required to disclose in the questionnaire, among other things, any transaction that the director or any immediate family member has entered into with Key or relationships that a director or an immediate family member has with Key, whether direct or indirect. This information is provided to our legal department for review and, if required, submitted to the Board for the process of determining independence.

 

Mr. Reeves joined the Board in October 2007 and is currently an executive officer with Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, one of our customers. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, Anadarko purchased services from us for approximately $50.3 million, which is less than 1% of Anadarko’s revenue for 2010. This relationship was reviewed and approved under the Affiliate Transaction Policy. The Board does not consider this amount to be material, and the relationship between Anadarko and Key does not otherwise affect Mr. Reeves’ independence.

 

Mr. Ward joined the Board in November 2010 and is currently a member, and a managing director of the sole manager, of the general partner of the indirect, majority owner of Element Petroleum, LP, one of our customers. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, Element purchased services from us for approximately $2.0 million, which is approximately 5.6% of Element’s revenue for 2010. This relationship was reviewed and approved under the Affiliate Transaction Policy.

 

Executive Summary

 

The following discussion addresses the compensation during 2010 of our named executive officers, or NEOs, which consist of:

 

 

We believe that our compensation program is aligned with our philosophy that compensation should be competitive with the market, driven by contribution to the company, and reward exceptional performance. Our compensation programs are designed to challenge participants as well as reward them for superior performance for our Company and our stockholders. As such, we believe that our program should:

 

 

Our Compensation Discussion and Analysis will discuss in greater detail our compensation policies and practices, each element of compensation and the relevant basis for each. We believe that our compensation programs, policies and practices for 2010, disclosed in this report and in the tables that follow, demonstrate that our compensation philosophy and program achieve our compensation goals, and that the total mix of compensation provided to our named executive officers is consistent with a philosophy of motivation and reward for achieving long-term stockholder value.

 

Oversight of Executive Compensation Program

 

As described above under “Corporate Governance — Board Committees — Compensation Committee,” the Compensation Committee of our Board has responsibility for establishing, implementing and continually monitoring adherence with our compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to engage independent compensation consultants, who report directly to the committee, to advise and consult on compensation issues.

 

Compensation Consultant

 

In 2010, the Compensation Committee renewed its engagement with Longnecker & Associates as its independent compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee on all matters related to the senior executives’ compensation. Longnecker was initially retained by the Compensation Committee in May 2007, and has advised the Compensation Committee in each subsequent year thereafter. Longnecker assists the Compensation Committee by providing comparative market data for senior executives on compensation practices and programs based on an analysis of peer competitors. Longnecker also provides guidance on industry best practices. This information assists us in developing and implementing compensation programs generally competitive with those of other companies in our industry and other companies with which we generally compete for executive talent.

The Compensation Committee reviews salary ranges for all senior executive positions annually. In August 2010, Longnecker provided a formal review for the Compensation Committee on senior executive compensation. The review included total compensation for executives, including base salary, annual incentives, long-term incentives, and other forms of compensation such as pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings. The review also assessed the competitiveness of each executive’s compensation as compared to a specific peer group and other pertinent published surveys. Specifically, Longnecker evaluated the total direct compensation of the senior executives, assessed the competitiveness of our executive compensation, and analyzed other factors such as cost of management, pay versus total stockholder return performance, mix of pay, peer annual incentive targets and mix of peer long-term incentive awards.

 

The benchmarks used for the executive compensation comparisons included companies in our industry with similar revenue and companies that we considered to be competing for the same level of executive talent. The following companies fit either one of those categories and were used in our peer group analysis:

 

 

The recommendations of Longnecker, including the selection of the peer group, were reviewed with management and adjusted by the Compensation Committee as appropriate to provide the most relevant information to the Compensation Committee.

 

Longnecker also reviewed survey data as a reference point to compare the compensation of our executives to those of a broad range of companies. The following published surveys utilized by Longnecker were:

 

 

Based on its annual review of the compensation program, Longnecker recommended to the Compensation Committee that we (i) consider reinstating the salary reduction that had been in effect since March 2009, which would bring the senior executive salaries near the market 50th percentile, (ii) continue to provide annual incentive targets near the 75th percentile, (iii) continue to set realistic goals and utilize discretion when necessary to reward outstanding performance on an individual basis, (iv) maintain the use of restricted stock for the executive team at least for 2011 to ensure proper retention in a turnaround market environment, and (v) maintain current targeted total direct compensation levels between the market 50th and 75th percentiles to align the interests of the Company and the executives with those of the stockholders and to reward executives for exceptional performance.

 

In May 2010, Longnecker conducted a formal review of Board compensation. The analysis suggested that Key should increase its fees paid to its Lead Director and increase the value of its annual grant to all the members of the Board. However, the Board determined that it would have been inappropriate at that time to increase fees payable to the Board, which had temporarily reduced its fees by 10%. The Board eliminated the 10% voluntary reduction in November 2010 and simultaneously provided the fee increases to its directors as suggested by the Longnecker survey. See “Director Compensation” below for additional information regarding director fees.

The benchmarks used for the Board compensation survey were the same companies used in the executive compensation review.

 

Advice and consulting for all other non-executive compensation is completed by third parties other than Longnecker.

 

Executive Compensation Risk Assessment

 

We do not believe that our compensation policies and practices encourage excessive or unnecessary risk-taking. In fact, we believe that our program is designed with an appropriate balance of annual and long-term incentives. Factors considered in this analysis include:

 

 

Role of Executives in Establishing Compensation

 

The Compensation Committee makes the final determination of all compensation paid to our NEOs and is involved in all compensation decisions affecting our chief executive officer. However, management also plays a role in the determination of executive compensation levels. The key members of management involved in the compensation process are the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, the chief operating officer, the general counsel and the chief people officer. Management proposes certain corporate and executive performance objectives for executive management. Management also participates in the discussion of peer companies to be used to benchmark NEO compensation, and recommends the overall funding level for cash bonuses and equity incentive awards. All management recommendations are reviewed by Longnecker, modified as necessary by the Compensation Committee, and approved by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee meets regularly in executive session without management present.

 

Compensation Philosophy

 

In order to recruit and retain the most qualified and competent individuals as senior executives, we strive to maintain a compensation program that is competitive in our market and with respect to the general profession of our executives. We remain committed to hiring and retaining qualified, motivated employees at all levels within the organization while ensuring that all forms of compensation are aligned with business needs. The purpose of our compensation program is to reward exceptional organizational and individual performance. Our compensation system is designed to support the successful attainment of our vision, values and business objectives.

The following compensation objectives are considered in setting the compensation components for our senior executives:

 

 

We want our executives to be motivated to achieve our short- and long-term goals, without sacrificing our financial and corporate integrity in trying to achieve those goals. While an executive’s overall compensation should be strongly influenced by the achievement of specific financial targets, we believe that an executive must be provided a degree of financial certainty and stability in his or her compensation. The design and operation of the compensation arrangements do not provide the executives with incentives to engage in business or other activities that would threaten the value of Key or its stockholders.

 

The principal components of our executive compensation program are base salary, cash incentive bonuses and long-term incentive awards in the form of equity, including performance-based equity. We blend these elements in order to formulate compensation packages which provide competitive pay, reward the achievement of financial, operational and strategic objectives on a short- and long-term basis, and align the interests of our executive officers and other senior personnel with those of our stockholders. To understand our compensation philosophy, it is important to note that we believe that compensation is not the only manner in which we attract people to Key. We strive to hire and retain talented people who are compatible with our corporate culture, committed to our core values, and who want to make a contribution to our mission.

 

Use of Employment Agreements

 

We have entered into multi-year employment agreements with each of our named executive officers. We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company to enter into multi-year employment agreements with our executive officers because the agreements foster long-term retention, while still allowing the Compensation Committee to exercise considerable discretion in designing incentive compensation programs.

 

Elements of Compensation

 

The total compensation and benefits program for our senior executives generally consists of the following components:

 

 

Base Salaries

 

We provide base salaries to compensate our senior executives and other employees for services performed during the fiscal year. This provides a level of financial certainty and stability in an industry with historical volatility and cyclicality. The base salaries are designed to reflect the experience, education, responsibilities and contribution of the individual executive officers. This form of compensation is eligible for annual merit increases, and is initially established for each executive through individual negotiation and is reflected in his or her employment agreement. Thereafter, salaries are reviewed annually, based on a number of factors, both quantitative, including detailed organizational and competitive analyses performed by an independent consultant engaged by the Compensation Committee, and qualitative, including the Compensation Committee’s perception of the executive’s experience, performance and contribution to our business objectives and corporate values.

 

The temporary pay reduction program that began effective March 1, 2009 continued through most of 2010 with Mr. Alario’s salary reduced by 10%, Messrs. Wilson and Whichard and Ms. Clarke’s salaries reduced by 7% each, and Mr. Weinheimer’s salary reduced by 5%. In November 2010, the Compensation Committee eliminated the temporary pay reduction program.

 

Cash Bonus Incentive Plan

 

The cash bonus incentive plan provides variable cash compensation earned only when established performance goals are achieved. It is designed to reward the plan participants, including the NEOs, who have achieved certain corporate and executive performance objectives and have contributed to the achievement of certain objectives of Key. For 2010, the cash bonus incentive plan was measured on an annual basis.

 

Under this cash compensation program, each executive has the opportunity to earn a cash incentive compensation bonus based on the achievement of pre-determined operating and financial performance measures and other performance objectives established by the Compensation Committee. The goals include a financial target and other targets, such as safety targets, retention targets and some individual job-related targets. Each goal is weighted in terms of a percentage of the total bonus target.

 

Our financial performance target is tied to our financial business plan, which is approved by the Board. The Compensation Committee establishes a threshold and a target percentage of financial performance for the period. The threshold level of financial performance must be met in order to fund the incentive program. If the financial performance falls short of the threshold, then no incentive bonuses are awarded under the program regardless of goal achievement under the other non-financial measures. If the financial threshold is achieved, but less than 100% of the target is achieved, then the executive may receive an incremental credit with respect to the financial target. Assuming that the financial threshold is met, the executive can then receive credit in the other bonus measurements. The Compensation Committee reviews all performance goals at the beginning of the period and authorizes payment following the end of the period.

 

Each executive’s bonus opportunity is initially reflected in the executive’s employment agreement and subsequently reviewed at least annually. Under our incentive compensation program, the Compensation Committee has discretion to adjust targets, as well as individual awards, either positively or negatively.

 

2010 Cash Bonus Incentive Plan

 

In December 2010, the Compensation Committee approved cash bonuses payable to the officers and employees of the Company under the 2010 Cash Bonus Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee elected to award the bonuses in light of the significant actions that the Company had undertaken in 2010 to reposition its businesses and to drive future results. During 2010, the Company divested both its pressure pumping and wireline businesses while simultaneously expanding its coiled tubing, rigs services and fluids management business with the acquisition of certain subsidiaries and associated assets of OFS Energy Services, LLC.

In evaluating the payment of the bonuses, the Compensation Committee reviewed the potential payout of bonuses under the 2010 Cash Bonus Incentive Plan. For 2010, the Compensation Committee had approved the following performance measurements:

 

PBT		The financial target is based on profit before taxes, or PBT. We calculate this financial target as net income before income taxes, amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests and the results of discontinued operations.
Safety		This goal represents the improvement required, or desired result, in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA, recordable incident rate. OSHA recordable incident rates are determined by measuring the number of incidents, such as accidents or injuries, involving our employees. Incidents that are recorded include accidents or injuries potentially resulting in a fatality, an employee missing work, an employee having to switch to “light” duty work or an employee needing to have medical treatment.
Additional Individual Objectives		Individual performance goals are based on individual objectives for each NEO specific to his or her area of expertise and oversight, such as the implementation of a new corporate-wide initiative, system or policy. The Compensation Committee sets, to the extent it deems appropriate, the individual targets for the CEO. The individual objectives for all other NEOs are set by his or her direct supervisor, which in most cases for the NEOs, is the CEO.

 

An aggregate payout of $37 million would have been payable to all officers and employees under the 2010 Cash Bonus Incentive Plan due, in part, to the financial reporting impact of the strategic initiatives undertaken during 2010 and to the inclusion of the results of operations from the divested businesses, which the Compensation Committee determined was appropriate to consider because those businesses remained under Company management for three quarters during 2010 and their continued profitability was critical to the Company’s ability to sell them at a favorable price. Although the Compensation Committee determined that management and employees should be rewarded for their efforts in 2010 to position the Company for long-term growth through execution of the strategic initiatives, it also believed that a reduction to what would have otherwise been payable under the 2010 Cash Bonus Incentive Plan was appropriate because application of the PBT component of the bonus formula would have resulted in an extraordinary payout due to the inclusion of gain on the sale of the pressure pumping and wireline businesses.

 

Accordingly, the Compensation Committee referred to the criteria in the 2010 Cash Bonus Incentive Plan to provide general guidelines for establishing bonus levels, but exercised its negative discretion to reduce the amounts payable to avoid distortions due to the gain on the sale of the pressure pumping and wireline businesses and to reflect that the Company did not meet its safety target. Meanwhile, the Compensation Committee exercised its judgment as to the appropriate amount to reward management for its efforts in executing the Company’s long-term strategic objectives. As a result, the Compensation Committee reduced the aggregate bonus payments to all officers and employees under the 2010 Cash Bonus Incentive Plan to approximately $18 million.

 

In calculating the bonuses, the Compensation Committee reviewed pro-forma financial information of the Company, as if the pressure pumping and wireline businesses had not been sold. The Committee then further applied its judgment in assessing the performance of the CEO in executing on the strategic vision of the Company in calculating his bonus payout. In determining the overall bonus calculation for the other NEOs, the Compensation Committee considered the CEO’s perspective regarding their performance and their roles in executing the Company’s strategies. Other factors that the Compensation Committee considered in establishing the bonus included management’s successful reduction of costs during the down-market and the personal sacrifices made by each employee of the Company during the last two years, such as reduction in pay and reduced benefits.

The following table indicates the bonus amounts that would have been payable to each NEO under the 2010 Cash Bonus Incentive Plan prior to any adjustment, and the actual amounts paid to each NEO following the Compensation Committee’s reduction of the aggregate amount payable under the plan:

 

		Bonus Payable Prior to				Bonus Paid Following
Name		Reduction				Reduction
Richard J. Alario		$	2,496,000			$	1,000,000
T. M. Whichard		$	712,500			$	310,000
Newton W. Wilson III		$	855,000			$	375,000
Kim B. Clarke		$	523,688			$	275,000
Don M. Weinheimer		$	523,688			$	220,000

 

The Compensation Committee also determined that, in light of the bonus being tied to the steps taken to reposition the Company, the bonus should be paid during the 2010 calendar year to provide an additional reward to the employees for their hard work during 2010. Ordinarily, bonuses would be paid in January of the succeeding year after the financial data used in the PBT calculation was available. That was unnecessary due to the Compensation Committee’s decisions for 2010.

 

2011 Cash Bonus Incentive Plan Performance Measurements

 

For 2011, the Compensation Committee approved the following performance measurements:

 

PBT		The financial target is based on profit before taxes, or PBT. We calculate this financial target as net income before income taxes, amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests and the results of discontinued operations.
Safety		This goal represents the improvement required, or desired result, in the OSHA recordable incident rate, as discussed in “2010 Cash Bonus Incentive Plan” above.
Additional Individual Objectives		Individual performance goals are based on individual objectives for each NEO specific to his or her area of expertise and oversight, as discussed in “2010 Cash Bonus Incentive Plan” above.

 

The Compensation Committee also approved weightings with respect to each of the performance measurements under the 2011 Cash Bonus Incentive Plan as follows:

 

2011 Performance Measure Weighting

 

Participant		PBT				Safety				Individual
Richard J. Alario			60	%			15	%			25	%
T.M. Whichard III			60	%			15	%			25	%
Newton W. Wilson III			60	%			15	%			25	%
Kim B. Clarke			60	%			15	%			25	%
Don D. Weinheimer			60	%			15	%			25	%

 

The financial performance measurement and safety measurement were determined using our operating budget for 2011. The financial performance is contingent on several factors beyond our control, including commodity prices and customers’ capital budgets, and it includes a degree of “stretch” beyond projections with respect to our estimated activity levels. As such, while we believe that the financial performance measurement established by the Compensation Committee is achievable, it may be difficult to attain if our assumptions prove to be inaccurate. The safety target remains a component of the cash bonus incentive plan. Safety targets are determined based on overall trending year-over-year relative to the level of activity. In years during which the trend is significantly affected by a volatile employment market, such as significant changes in workforce to meet increased activity levels, establishing a practical target becomes somewhat more difficult. In this regard, the safety goals set for 2011 may be less achievable than in years during which the workforce has remained relatively more steady and consistent.

Notwithstanding this difficulty, safety improvement is fundamental to the core values at Key and those of our customers, and, accordingly, we will continue to set performance goals that strive for an incident-free workplace. The weighting of the targets under the 2011 Cash Bonus Incentive Plan reflects the continued emphasis to align our overall financial performance with the incentive compensation of each of the executives and to further emphasize the value of safety to the Company.

 

Under the 2011 plan, the executives’ bonus opportunity, which is measured as a percentage of base salary, is as follows:

 

Participant		Threshold				Target				Maximum
Richard J. Alario			50	%			125	%			300	%
T. M. Whichard III			35	%			75	%			190	%
Newton W. Wilson III			35	%			75	%			190	%
Kim B. Clarke			35	%			75	%			190	%
Don D. Weinheimer			35	%			75	%			190	%

 

The 2011 Cash Bonus Incentive Plan for employees at vice-president level and above calculates cash bonus opportunities as an absolute percentage of base salary, and the percentage achieved is multiplied by the respective weighting of the performance targets. An executive may receive an incremental bonus percentage if the financial performance threshold is achieved, but less than 100% if the financial performance target is achieved. For example, Mr. Alario would be entitled a percentage of his salary between 50% to 125% depending on the level of PBT above threshold, but below budget. The same concept applies if we outperform target PBT. In that scenario, Mr. Alario would be entitled to a percentage of his salary between 125% to 300%, depending on the level above PBT target, but below maximum level PBT. If we achieve PBT in excess of the maximum target, no additional bonus is paid.

 

Each performance measure is factored depending on the level of financial performance. For example, even if an executive reaches 100% of his or her safety or individual goals, the eligible bonus is factored by the percentage level of financial performance reached. By way of example, if we achieve threshold (but not target) PBT performance, and each of the other performance targets is met, Mr. Alario would receive a cash bonus equal to 50% of his base salary, calculated as follows: (50% threshold percentage multiplied by 60% PBT weighting) plus (50% threshold percentage multiplied by 15% safety weighting) plus (50% threshold percentage multiplied by 25% individual weighting) = 50% of base salary. Alternatively, if we achieve threshold PBT and individual goals are met, but the safety goal is not achieved, Mr. Alario would then be entitled to 42.5% of his base salary, calculated as follows: (50% threshold percentage multiplied by 60% PBT weighting) plus (50% threshold percentage multiplied by 25% individual weighting) = 42.5% of base salary. The shift to factoring the payment to the financial performance achievement level is to further align financial performance and executive incentive compensation.

 

Discretionary Cash Bonuses

 

In addition to cash bonuses under the incentive plan discussed above, from time to time, the Compensation Committee may also approve the payment of discretionary cash bonuses to officers and other employees in recognition of an individual’s achievement beyond established targets. No discretionary bonuses were paid to any executive officer for fiscal 2010.

 

Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Compensation

 

The purpose of our long-term incentive compensation is to align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. We want our executives to be focused on increasing stockholder value. In order to encourage and establish this focus on stockholder value, during 2010, we used the Key Energy Services, Inc. 2007 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan (the 2007 Plan) and the Key Energy Services, Inc. 2009 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan (the 2009 Plan) as long-term vehicles to accomplish this goal. The 2007 Plan was approved by our stockholders in December 2007, shortly after the expiration in November 2007 of the Key Energy Group, Inc. 1997 Incentive Plan (the 1997 Plan). Accordingly, since 2008, no awards have been made under the 1997 Plan; however, awards that were previously made under the 1997 Plan remain outstanding.

To promote our long-term objectives, equity awards are made under both the 2009 Plan and the 2007 Plan to directors, executive officers and other employees who were in a position to make a significant contribution to our long-term success. The terms of the 2009 Plan and the 2007 Plan are substantially the same, and both provide that the Compensation Committee has the authority to grant participants different types of equity awards, including non-qualified and incentive stock options, common stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance compensation awards and SARs. Since equity awards may vest and grow in value over time, this component of our compensation plan is designed to provide incentives to reward performance over a sustained period. Since its adoption, only stock options and restricted stock have been granted under the 2007 Plan, and only restricted stock and performance units have been granted under the 2009 Plan.

 

During 2010, based on the recommendation of Longnecker, we made long-term equity-based incentive awards to all of our executive officers of restricted shares and performance units. The aggregate amount of the awards was intended to align the executives’ equity-based compensation between the 50th and 75th percentiles of the peer group with respect to this component of total compensation. The allocation between restricted shares and performance units was based on Longnecker’s recommendation in consideration of the overall economic benefit to the executives and impact to Key.

 

For this year’s annual long-term equity incentive grant, on February 4, 2011, the Compensation Committee approved a grant under the 2009 Plan consisting of 1,135,581 shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units to our executive officers and approximately 170 of our other employees. After giving effect to these grants, there are 1,004,854 shares remaining under the 2009 Plan as of March 14, 2011. As of March 14, 2011, there remained 287,042 shares available for grant under the 2007 Plan, which the Compensation Committee and Equity Award Committee continue to use for smaller grants in connection with individual promotions, new hires and similar situations.

 

The following types of awards are available for grant under the 2009 Plan and the 2007 Plan:

 

Restricted Stock. Restricted stock awards represent awards of actual shares of our common stock that include vesting provisions which are contingent upon continued employment. Typically the restricted stock we grant to our executives vests at a rate of one-third per year over a three-year term.

 

We believe that awards of restricted stock provide a significant incentive for executives to achieve and maintain high levels of performance over multi-year periods, and strengthen the connection between executive and stockholder interests. We believe that restricted shares are a powerful tool for helping us retain executive talent. The higher value of a share of restricted stock in comparison to a stock option allows us to issue fewer total shares in order to arrive at a competitive total long-term incentive award value. Furthermore, we believe that the use of restricted stock reflects competitive practice among other oilfield service companies with whom we compete for executive talent.

 

Performance Units. In 2010, our Compensation Committee approved the creation of performance units under the 2009 Plan. Performance units provide a cash incentive award, the unit value of which is determined with reference to the value of our common stock. The performance units are measured based on two performance periods. One half of the performance units are measured based on a performance period consisting of the first year after the grant date, and the other half are measured based on a performance period consisting of the second year after the grant date. At the end of each performance period, subject to review and certification of results by our Compensation Committee (as administrator under the 2009 Plan), the following percentage of performance units subject to that performance period vest based on the relative placement of Key’s total stockholder return within a peer group of companies:

 

 

The peer group consists of Nabors Industries, Inc., Weatherford International Ltd., Basic Energy Services, Inc., Complete Production Services, Inc. and RPC, Inc., or any other corporation selected by our

Compensation Committee. (While there is some overlap, this peer group is not the same as the peer group used for comparative market data analyses in connection with setting compensation levels, which is discussed above under the heading “Compensation Consultant.”) Total stockholder return is calculated with respect to each performance period, for Key and each other company in the peer group, based on the change in (i) the average closing price of common stock for the 30 trading days immediately preceding the grant date and (ii) the average closing price of common stock for the last 30 trading days before the end of the applicable performance period (adding to such amount, if any, dividends paid per share by any of the companies during the applicable performance period).

 

If any performance units vest for a completed performance period, the participant will be paid, within 60 days following the end of the performance period, a cash amount equal to the vested percentage of the performance units multiplied by the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day of that performance period (subject to a participant’s continuing employment through the payment date, except that payment will still be made in the case of a participant’s death or disability following the end of the performance period but prior to the payment date).

 

We believe that the grant of performance units will provide a long-term incentive for executives to achieve a high level of performance that is tied to our performance relative to industry peers under common external market conditions, while further strengthening the connection between executive and stockholder interests. We also believe they provide forfeitable long-term incentives that encourage executive retention.

 

Although our market capitalization grew 68.5% during 2010 in part as a result of certain strategic initiatives, our total stockholder return in the first performance period did not place within the peer group necessary for any of the performance units to vest.

 

Stock Options. Stock options represent rights to purchase shares of Key common stock at a set price at some date in the future, not to exceed ten years from the date of grant (except for incentive stock options granted to a stockholder holding 10% or more of our common stock, the term of which may not exceed five years from the grant date). Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing stock price on the date of the grant (except for incentive stock options granted to a stockholder holding 10% or more of our common stock, the exercise price for which may not be less than 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant).

 

We believe that awards of stock options provide a significant incentive for senior executives to remain employed and to achieve and maintain high levels of performance over multi-year periods, and strengthen the connection between executive and stockholder interests. Although no performance-vesting criteria are applied to our stock option awards, we believe that stock options represent a powerful performance incentive, as the options become valuable only to the extent that our stock price increases following the date of grant.

 

Stock Appreciation Rights. SARs entitle the recipient to receive the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of exercise, multiplied by the number of shares of common stock for which the SAR was exercised. The exercise price is equal to the closing stock price on the date of grant. The exercise price for a SAR may be settled in cash, shares of our common stock or a combination thereof.

 

We believe that SARs provide a significant incentive for executives to achieve and maintain high levels of performance over multi-year periods, and that they strengthen the connection between executive and stockholder interests. We believe that SARs are a creative tool for helping us retain executive talent. Although no SARs have been granted under the 2009 Plan or the 2007 Plan, SARs granted under the 1997 Plan remain outstanding. Currently outstanding SARs were granted with three year ratable vesting schedules and 10-year lives.

Retirement, Health and Welfare Benefits

 

We offer a variety of retirement, health and welfare programs to all eligible employees. Under the terms of their employment agreements, the NEOs are eligible for the same broad-based benefit programs on the same basis as the rest of our employees. Our health and welfare programs include medical, pharmacy, dental, vision, life insurance and accidental death and disability.

 

In addition to the compensation described above, under the terms of his employment agreement, the CEO may also be paid reasonable fees for personal financial advisory counseling, accounting and related services, legal advisory or attorneys’ fees and income tax preparation and tax audit services. Additional perquisites paid for the CEO include automobile allowances plus reimbursement for reasonable insurance and maintenance expenses and club memberships. With respect to all NEOs, we pay all covered out-of-pocket medical and dental expenses not otherwise covered by insurance. The NEOs receive these reimbursements under the terms of, and subject to the limitations set forth in, our Executive Health Reimbursement Plan. Our costs associated with providing these benefits for NEOs in 2010 are reflected under “Compensation of Executive Officers-Perquisites” below.

 

We maintain a 401(k) plan for our employees. Under the 401(k) plan, eligible employees may elect to contribute up to 100% of their eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis in accordance with the limitations imposed under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. We also match 100% of each employee’s deferrals up to 4% of the individual’s eligible salary, subject to a cap of $245,000. Therefore, even if an employee earned more than $245,000 in eligible salary, our matching contribution could not exceed $9,800. However, as previously disclosed, as part of the cost reduction efforts that we implemented in response to U.S. and global declining market conditions, effective March 1, 2009, we amended our 401(k) plan to suspend our matching contributions to all employees, including our executives. The suspension remained in effect for the remainder of 2009 and all of 2010. We reinstated matching contributions effective for the 2011 plan year.

 

The cash amounts contributed under the 401(k) plan are held in a trust and invested among various investment funds in accordance with the directions of each participant. We did not make any employer matching contributions to the 401(k) plan for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

Severance Payments/Change of Control

 

We have employment agreements in place with each of the NEOs providing for severance compensation for a period of up to three years if the executive’s employment is terminated for a variety of reasons, including a change of control of Key. We have provided more information about these benefits, along with estimates of the value under various circumstances, under the heading “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” below.

 

Our practice has been to structure control benefits as “double trigger” benefits. In other words, the change of control does not itself trigger benefits. Rather, benefits are paid only if the employment of the executive is terminated during a specified period after a change of control. We believe a “double trigger” benefit maximizes stockholder value because it prevents an unintended windfall to executives in the event of a friendly change of control, while still providing appropriate incentives to cooperate in negotiating any change of control. In addition, these agreements avoid distractions involving executive management that arise when the Board is considering possible strategic transactions involving a change of control, and assure continuity of executive management and objective input to the Board when it is considering any strategic transaction. For additional information concerning our change of control agreements, see “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” below.

 

Each of the executive officers is subject to noncompete and non-solicitation provisions pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements.

Regulatory Considerations

 

The tax and accounting consequences of utilizing various forms of compensation are considered by the Compensation Committee when adopting new or modifying existing compensation.

 

Under Section 162(m) of the Code, publicly-held corporations may not take a tax deduction for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to any of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table during any fiscal year. There is an exception to the $1 million limitation for performance-based compensation meeting certain requirements. To maintain flexibility in compensating executives in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy requiring all compensation to be deductible under Section 162(m). However, the Compensation Committee considers deductibility under Section 162(m) with respect to compensation arrangements for executives. The Compensation Committee cannot guarantee that future executive compensation will be fully deductible under Section 162(m).

 

Accounting for Equity-Based Compensation

 

We account for equity-based compensation in accordance with the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 718, “Stock Compensation”.

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table contains information about the compensation that our NEOs earned for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008:

 

 

 

 

Perquisites

 

The following table contains information about the perquisites that our NEOs received for fiscal year 2010:

 

 

 

 

2010 Grants of Plan Based Awards

 

The following table presents information on plan-based awards in fiscal 2010 to the NEOs:

 

 

 

 

Employment Agreements

 

Each NEO’s employment agreement provides for an initial term of two years and automatically renews for successive one-year extension terms unless terminated by the executive or Key at least 90 days prior to the commencement of an extension term. Each of the NEOs receives an annual salary, which can be increased (but not decreased, except as it relates to Mr. Whichard’s employment agreement, which is silent on whether the annual salary can be decreased) at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and, in the case of Mr. Wilson, Mr. Whichard, Mr. Weinheimer and Ms. Clarke, at the discretion of the CEO. Each executive is also eligible for an annual incentive bonus, of up to 100% of his or her base salary in the case of Mr. Wilson, Mr. Weinheimer and Ms. Clarke, up to 200% of his base salary in the case of Mr. Alario, and up to such amount as determined by the Compensation Committee in consultation with the CEO in the case of Mr. Whichard. Each NEO is entitled to participate in awards of equity-based incentives at the discretion of the Board or the Compensation Committee. Pursuant to the Executive Health Reimbursement Plan, in the absence

of medical and dental insurance coverage, Key reimburses each of the NEOs directly for all medical and dental expenses incurred by them and their respective spouses and children, so that the executives have no out-of-pocket cost with respect to such expenses.

 

Mr. Alario receives an allowance of $1,100 per month, plus reimbursement for reasonable insurance and maintenance expenses, in connection with the use of his automobile and is entitled to be reimbursed up to $15,000 in any fiscal year for personal services provided by certified public accountants and tax attorneys. Mr. Alario is also entitled to be reimbursed for the initiation fee and the annual or other periodic fees, dues and costs to become and remain a member of one club or association for business use, as approved by the Compensation Committee.

 

Each of the NEOs’ employment agreements contains a comprehensive non-compete provision. The non-compete provision prohibits the executive from engaging in any activities that are competitive with Key during his or her employment, and for any period in which the executive is receiving severance compensation from Key (or if payment of severance compensation is increased due to a change of control, for a period of three years after the termination of employment) or for twelve months following termination if the executive receives no severance compensation from Key.

 

The employment agreements for all of the NEOs provide for compliance with the provisions of Section 409A of the Code concerning the payment of potential future benefits to the executives and reimbursement of any tax penalties owed pursuant to Section 409A of the Code on an after-tax basis. If Mr. Alario is subject to the tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, he will be reimbursed for such tax on an after-tax basis. If any of Mr. Wilson, Mr. Whichard, Ms. Clarke or Mr. Weinheimer is subject to the tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, he or she will be reimbursed for such tax on an after-tax basis, so long as the executive has agreed to a reduction of up to 10% of the value the executive would have received if such reduction would avoid the imposition of such tax.

 

The employment agreements also provide for certain severance benefits for each of the NEOs. Please see “Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” and “Elements of Severance Payments” below for further discussion.

2010 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 

The following table provides information with respect to outstanding stock options, restricted stock, and performance units held by the NEOs as of December 31, 2010: