e424b3
Filed
Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration
No. 333-158418
HEALTHCARE
TRUST OF AMERICA, INC.
SUPPLEMENT NO. 15 DATED MAY 18, 2011
TO THE PROSPECTUS DATED MARCH 19, 2010
This document supplements, and should be read in conjunction
with our prospectus dated March 19, 2010 and Supplement
No. 14 dated April 27, 2011, relating to our offering
of up to $2,200,000,000 of shares of common stock. The purpose
of this Supplement No. 15 is to disclose:
|
|
|
|
|
the status of our offerings; and
|
|
|
|
our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2011, which
is attached to this supplement as Annex A.
|
Status of
Our Offerings
As of March 19, 2010, we had received and accepted
subscriptions in our initial public offering, or our initial
offering, for 147,562,354 shares of our common stock, or
$1,474,062,000, excluding shares issued pursuant to our
distribution reinvestment plan. On March 19, 2010, we
stopped offering shares of our common stock in our initial
offering.
We commenced our follow-on public offering of shares of our
common stock, or our follow-on offering, on March 19, 2010.
We stopped offering shares in our primary offering on
February 28, 2011 and stopped accepting subscriptions in
our primary offering on March 31, 2011. As of
March 31, 2011, we had received and accepted subscriptions
in our follow-on offering for 72,219,583 shares, or
$721,183,000, excluding shares of our common stock issued under
our distribution reinvestment plan.
We are continuing to offer and sell shares pursuant to the
distribution reinvestment plan, and as of May 18, 2011,
13,200,011 shares remained available for issuance pursuant
to the plan. However, we may determine to terminate the
distribution reinvestment plan at any time.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31,
2011
|
|
|
Or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission File Number:
000-53206
Healthcare Trust of America,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
20-4738467
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
16435 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 320,
Scottsdale, Arizona
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
85254
(Zip Code)
|
(480) 998-3478
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since
last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes
o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
Accelerated filer
|
|
o
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
|
þ
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company
|
|
o
|
|
|
Indicate by
check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
|
o Yes þ No
|
As of May 12, 2011, there were 226,194,608 shares of common
stock of Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. outstanding.
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
(A Maryland Corporation)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Real estate investments, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating properties, net
|
|
$
|
1,786,767,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,772,923,000
|
|
Properties classified as held for sale, net
|
|
|
24,540,000
|
|
|
|
24,540,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate investments, net
|
|
|
1,811,307,000
|
|
|
|
1,797,463,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate notes receivable, net
|
|
|
57,677,000
|
|
|
|
57,091,000
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
207,405,000
|
|
|
|
29,270,000
|
|
Accounts and other receivables, net
|
|
|
15,221,000
|
|
|
|
16,385,000
|
|
Restricted cash and escrow deposits
|
|
|
25,370,000
|
|
|
|
26,679,000
|
|
Identified intangible assets, net
|
|
|
298,330,000
|
|
|
|
300,587,000
|
|
Non-real estate assets of properties held for sale
|
|
|
3,768,000
|
|
|
|
3,768,000
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
44,992,000
|
|
|
|
40,552,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,464,070,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,271,795,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and secured term loans payable, net
|
|
$
|
728,101,000
|
|
|
$
|
699,526,000
|
|
Outstanding balance on unsecured revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
44,555,000
|
|
|
|
43,033,000
|
|
Derivative financial instruments interest rate swaps
|
|
|
1,211,000
|
|
|
|
1,527,000
|
|
Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities
|
|
|
16,498,000
|
|
|
|
16,168,000
|
|
Identified intangible liabilities, net
|
|
|
12,742,000
|
|
|
|
13,059,000
|
|
Liabilities of properties held for sale
|
|
|
369,000
|
|
|
|
369,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
803,476,000
|
|
|
|
780,682,000
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interest of limited partners
|
|
|
3,889,000
|
|
|
|
3,867,000
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares
authorized; none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares
authorized; 225,679,179 and 202,643,705 shares issued and
outstanding as of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively
|
|
|
2,251,000
|
|
|
|
2,026,000
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,001,028,000
|
|
|
|
1,795,413,000
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(346,574,000
|
)
|
|
|
(310,193,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,656,705,000
|
|
|
|
1,487,246,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
2,464,070,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,271,795,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
68,413,000
|
|
|
$
|
42,309,000
|
|
Interest income from mortgage notes receivable and other income
|
|
|
1,649,000
|
|
|
|
2,639,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
70,062,000
|
|
|
|
44,948,000
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses
|
|
|
23,772,000
|
|
|
|
14,585,000
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
7,308,000
|
|
|
|
3,605,000
|
|
Acquisition expenses (Note 3)
|
|
|
1,062,000
|
|
|
|
3,224,000
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26,750,000
|
|
|
|
17,006,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
58,892,000
|
|
|
|
38,420,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before other income (expense)
|
|
|
11,170,000
|
|
|
|
6,528,000
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing
costs and debt discount):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense related to mortgage loans payable, credit
facility, and derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
(10,346,000
|
)
|
|
|
(8,876,000
|
)
|
Net gain on change in fair value of derivative financial
instruments
|
|
|
504,000
|
|
|
|
1,561,000
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
118,000
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
1,446,000
|
|
|
|
(771,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
744,000
|
|
|
|
289,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
2,190,000
|
|
|
|
(482,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
of limited partners
|
|
|
(40,000
|
)
|
|
|
(64,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest
|
|
$
|
2,150,000
|
|
|
$
|
(546,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to controlling
interest on distributed and undistributed earnings
basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to controlling
interest
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
214,797,450
|
|
|
|
145,335,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
214,996,502
|
|
|
|
145,335,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Paid-In Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2009
|
|
|
140,590,686
|
|
|
$
|
1,405,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,251,996,000
|
|
|
$
|
(182,084,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,071,317,000
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
10,560,001
|
|
|
|
106,000
|
|
|
|
103,830,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,936,000
|
|
Offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,898,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,898,000
|
)
|
Amortization of nonvested share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
Issuance of common stock under the DRIP
|
|
|
1,318,102
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
12,509,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,522,000
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(899,399
|
)
|
|
|
(9,000
|
)
|
|
|
(8,524,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,533,000
|
)
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,032,000
|
)
|
|
|
(26,032,000
|
)
|
Adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,000
|
)
|
|
|
301,000
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
Net loss attributable to controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(546,000
|
)
|
|
|
(546,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE March 31, 2010
|
|
|
151,569,390
|
|
|
$
|
1,515,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,347,043,000
|
|
|
$
|
(208,361,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,140,197,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2010
|
|
|
202,643,705
|
|
|
$
|
2,026,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,795,413,000
|
|
|
$
|
(310,193,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,487,246,000
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
21,713,365
|
|
|
|
214,000
|
|
|
|
209,996,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,210,000
|
|
Offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,002,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,002,000
|
)
|
Issuance of restricted common stock
|
|
|
286,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of nonvested share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
897,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
897,000
|
|
Issuance of common stock under the DRIP
|
|
|
1,857,957
|
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
17,632,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,651,000
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(821,848
|
)
|
|
|
(8,000
|
)
|
|
|
(7,908,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,916,000
|
)
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,531,000
|
)
|
|
|
(38,531,000
|
)
|
Net income attributable to controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,150,000
|
|
|
|
2,150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE March 31, 2011
|
|
|
225,679,179
|
|
|
$
|
2,251,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,001,028,000
|
|
|
$
|
(346,574,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,656,705,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
2,190,000
|
|
|
$
|
(482,000
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (including deferred financing
costs, above/below market leases, debt discount, leasehold
interests, deferred rent receivable, note receivable closing
costs and discount and lease inducements)
|
|
|
23,998,000
|
|
|
|
19,880,000
|
|
Stock based compensation, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
897,000
|
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
337,000
|
|
|
|
59,000
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
(504,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,702,000
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and other receivables, net
|
|
|
866,000
|
|
|
|
(312,000
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(2,872,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,286,000
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(21,000
|
)
|
|
|
844,000
|
|
Accounts payable due to affiliates, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,769,000
|
)
|
Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities
|
|
|
219,000
|
|
|
|
1,158,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
25,110,000
|
|
|
|
12,546,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of real estate operating properties
|
|
|
(29,733,000
|
)
|
|
|
(133,639,000
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(2,548,000
|
)
|
|
|
(4,828,000
|
)
|
Restricted cash and escrow deposits
|
|
|
1,309,000
|
|
|
|
(16,994,000
|
)
|
Real estate deposits paid
|
|
|
(500,000
|
)
|
|
|
(141,000
|
)
|
Real estate deposits used
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(28,472,000
|
)
|
|
|
(155,602,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on mortgage loans payable
|
|
|
125,500,000
|
|
|
|
13,000,000
|
|
Purchase of noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,900,000
|
)
|
Payments on unsecured revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(7,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on mortgage loans payable
|
|
|
(103,496,000
|
)
|
|
|
(26,205,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
210,210,000
|
|
|
|
104,608,000
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(1,555,000
|
)
|
|
|
(994,000
|
)
|
Security deposits
|
|
|
132,000
|
|
|
|
306,000
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(7,916,000
|
)
|
|
|
(8,533,000
|
)
|
Payment of offering costs
|
|
|
(15,002,000
|
)
|
|
|
(12,898,000
|
)
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(19,320,000
|
)
|
|
|
(12,838,000
|
)
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest limited partner
|
|
|
(56,000
|
)
|
|
|
(87,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
181,497,000
|
|
|
|
52,459,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
178,135,000
|
|
|
|
(90,597,000
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Beginning of period
|
|
|
29,270,000
|
|
|
|
219,001,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS End of period
|
|
$
|
207,405,000
|
|
|
$
|
128,404,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
10,984,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,418,000
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
229,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
2,789,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,628,000
|
|
The following represents the significant increase in certain
assets and liabilities in connection with our acquisitions of
real estate investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans payable, net
|
|
$
|
(6,657,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,357,000
|
)
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under the DRIP
|
|
$
|
17,651,000
|
|
|
$
|
12,522,000
|
|
Distributions declared but not paid including stock issued under
the DRIP
|
|
$
|
13,839,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,227,000
|
|
Accrued offering costs
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,384,000
|
|
Adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(275,000
|
)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
5
The use of the words we, us or
our refers to Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. and
its subsidiaries, including Healthcare Trust of America
Holdings, LP, except where the context otherwise requires.
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Description of Business
|
Healthcare Trust of America, Inc., a Maryland corporation, was
incorporated on April 20, 2006. We were initially
capitalized on April 28, 2006 and consider that to be our
date of inception.
We are a fully integrated, self-administered, and self-managed
real estate investment trust, or REIT. Accordingly, our internal
management team manages our
day-to-day
operations and oversees and supervises our employees and outside
service providers. Acquisitions and asset management services
are performed in-house by our employees, with certain monitored
services provided by third parties at market rates. We do not
pay acquisition, disposition, or asset management fees to an
external advisor, and we have not and will not pay any
internalization fees.
We provide stockholders the potential for income and growth
through investment in a diversified portfolio of real estate
properties. We focus primarily on medical office buildings and
healthcare-related facilities. We also invest to a limited
extent in other real estate-related assets. However, we do not
presently intend to invest more than 15.0% of our total assets
in such other real estate-related assets. We focus primarily on
investments that produce recurring income. Subject to the
discussion in Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, we
believe that we have qualified to be taxed as a REIT for federal
income tax purposes and we intend to continue to be taxed as a
REIT. We conduct substantially all of our operations through
Healthcare Trust of America Holdings, LP, or our operating
partnership.
As of March 31, 2011, we had made 78 portfolio acquisitions
comprising approximately 11,107,000 square feet of gross
leasable area, or GLA, which includes 242 buildings and two real
estate-related assets. Additionally, in 2010, we purchased the
remaining 20% interest that we previously did not own in
HTA-Duke Chesterfield Rehab, LLC, or the JV Company, that owns
the Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center. The aggregate purchase
price of these acquisitions was $2,302,673,000. As of
March 31, 2011, the average occupancy of these properties
was 91%.
On September 20, 2006, we commenced a best efforts initial
public offering, or our initial offering, in which we offered up
to 200,000,000 shares of our common stock for $10.00 per
share in a primary offering and up to 21,052,632 shares of
our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan,
or the DRIP, at $9.50 per share, aggregating up to
$2,200,000,000. As of March 19, 2010, the date upon which
our initial offering terminated, we had received and accepted
subscriptions in our initial offering for
147,562,354 shares of our common stock, or $1,474,062,000,
excluding shares of our common stock issued under the DRIP.
On March 19, 2010, we commenced a best efforts follow-on
public offering, or our follow-on offering, in which we offered
up to 200,000,000 shares of our common stock for $10.00 per
share in a primary offering and up to 21,052,632 shares of
our common stock pursuant to the DRIP at $9.50 per share,
aggregating up to $2,200,000,000. We stopped offering shares in
the primary offering on February 28, 2011. For noncustodial
accounts, subscription agreements signed on or before
February 28, 2011 with all documents and funds received by
the end of business March 15, 2011 were accepted. For
custodial accounts, subscription agreements signed on or before
February 28, 2011 with all documents and funds received by
the end of business March 31, 2011 were accepted. During
the three months ended March 31, 2011, we had received and
accepted subscriptions in our follow-on offering for
21,615,344 shares of our common stock, or $215,649,000,
excluding shares of our common stock issued under the DRIP. As
of March 31, 2011, we had received and accepted
subscriptions in our follow-on offering for
72,219,583 shares of our common stock, or $721,183,000,
excluding shares of our common stock issued under the DRIP.
Our principal executive offices are located at
16435 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 320, Scottsdale,
Arizona, 85254. Our telephone number is
(480) 998-3478.
For investor services, contact DST Systems, Inc. by telephone at
(888) 801-0107.
6
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
The summary of significant accounting policies presented below
is designed to assist in understanding our interim condensed
consolidated financial statements. Such interim condensed
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes are
the representations of our management, who are responsible for
their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies
conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, or GAAP, in all material respects, and
have been consistently applied in preparing our accompanying
interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
Basis
of Presentation
Our accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements include our accounts and those of our operating
partnership, the wholly-owned subsidiaries of our operating
partnership and any variable interest entities, or VIEs, as
defined in the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or the
FASB, Accounting Standard Codification, or ASC, 810,
Consolidation, or ASC 810. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
the consolidated financial statements. We operate in an umbrella
partnership REIT, or UPREIT, structure in which wholly-owned
subsidiaries of our operating partnership own all of the
properties acquired on our behalf. We are the sole general
partner of our operating partnership and, as of March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, we owned an approximately
99.93% and an approximately 99.92%, respectively, general
partner interest in our operating partnership. As of
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, approximately
0.07% and 0.08%, respectively, of our operating partnership was
owned by certain physician investors who obtained limited
partner interests in connection with the Fannin acquisition in
June 2010 (see Note 13).
Because we are the sole general partner of our operating
partnership and have unilateral control over its management and
major operating decisions (even if additional limited partners
are admitted to our operating partnership), the accounts of our
operating partnership are consolidated in our interim condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Interim
Unaudited Financial Data
Our accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared by us in accordance with GAAP in
conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, or the SEC. Certain information and
footnote disclosures required for annual financial statements
have been condensed or excluded pursuant to SEC rules and
regulations. Accordingly, our accompanying interim condensed
consolidated financial statements do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete
financial statements. Our accompanying interim condensed
consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which
are, in our opinion, of a normal recurring nature and necessary
for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for the interim period. Interim
results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the full year; such results may be
less favorable. Our accompanying interim condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with our
audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
included in the 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of our interim condensed consolidated financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. These estimates
are made and evaluated on an on-going basis using information
that is currently available as well as various other assumptions
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual
results could differ from those estimates, perhaps in material
adverse ways, and those estimates could be different under
different assumptions or conditions.
7
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of all highly liquid
investments with a maturity of three months or less when
purchased.
Segment
Disclosure
ASC 280, Segment Reporting, or ASC 280, establishes
standards for reporting financial and descriptive information
about an enterprises reportable segment. We have
determined that we have one reportable segment, with activities
related to investing in medical office buildings,
healthcare-related facilities, healthcare-related office
properties and other real estate related assets. Our investments
in real estate and other real estate related assets are
geographically diversified and our chief operating decision
maker evaluates operating performance on an individual asset
level. As each of our assets has similar economic
characteristics, tenants, and products and services, our assets
have been aggregated into one reportable segment.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Below are the recently issued accounting pronouncements and our
evaluation of the impact of such pronouncements.
Fair
Value Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820), or
ASU 2010-06,
which provides amendments to Subtopic
820-10 that
require new disclosures and that clarify existing disclosures in
order to increase transparency in financial reporting with
regard to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements.
ASU 2010-06
requires new disclosures with respect to the amounts of
significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 fair value measurements and the reasons for those
transfers, as well as separate presentation about purchases,
sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair
value measurements using significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3). In addition, ASU
2010-06
provides amendments that clarify existing disclosures, requiring
a reporting entity to provide fair value measurement disclosures
for each class of assets and liabilities as well as disclosures
about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair
value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value
measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3.
Finally, ASU
2010-06
amends guidance on employers disclosures about
postretirement benefit plan assets under ASC 715,
Compensation Retirement Benefits, to require
that disclosures be provided by classes of assets instead of by
major categories of assets. ASU
2010-06 is
effective for the interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about
purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the rollforward
of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2010. Accordingly, ASU
2010-06
became effective for us on January 1, 2010, (though the
Level 3 activity disclosures only recently became effective
for us on January 1, 2011). The adoption of ASU
2010-06 has
not had a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Business
Combination Pronouncements
On December 21, 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-29,
Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for
Business Combinations, to address differences in the ways
entities have interpreted the requirements of ASC 805,
Business Combinations, or ASC 805, for disclosures
about pro forma revenue and earnings in a business combination.
The ASU states that if a public entity presents
comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose
revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the
business combination(s) that occurred during the current year
had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual
reporting period only. In addition, the ASU expands
the supplemental pro forma disclosures under ASC 805 to
include a description of the
8
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma
adjustments directly attributable to the business combination
included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings.
The amendments in this ASU are effective prospectively for
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2010. We do not expect
the adoption of ASU
2010-29 to
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
3.
|
Real
Estate Investments, Net, Assets Held for Sale, and Discontinued
Operations
|
Investment
in Operating Properties
Our investments in our consolidated operating properties
consisted of the following as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
165,766,000
|
|
|
$
|
164,821,000
|
|
Building and improvements
|
|
|
1,739,842,000
|
|
|
|
1,711,054,000
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,905,618,000
|
|
|
|
1,875,885,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(118,851,000
|
)
|
|
|
(102,962,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,786,767,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,772,923,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense related to our portfolio of operating
properties for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 was $16,025,000 and $10,518,000, respectively.
Assets
Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
Assets and liabilities of properties sold or to be sold are
classified as held for sale, to the extent not sold, on the
Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the
results of operations of such properties are included in
discontinued operations on the Companys Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented.
Properties classified as held for sale at March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010 include four buildings within our
Senior Care 1 portfolio, which is a portfolio consisting of six
total buildings located in various cities throughout Texas and
California. Pursuant to a master lease agreement in effect at
the time of our purchase of this portfolio, the lessee of the
four buildings within the portfolio that are located in Texas
was afforded the option to purchase these buildings at the
June 30, 2011 anniversary of the first five years of the
ten year lease term. On December 31, 2010, the lessee
opened escrow with a deposit of 5% of the minimum repurchase
price and provided us with timely notice, as required by the
agreement, of its intent to exercise this option. As a result of
these actions, in accordance with
ASC 360-10-45-9,
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Overall Other Presentation Matters Long
Lived Assets Classified as Held for Sale, we determined that
these four buildings met the criteria for held for sale
designation as of December 31, 2010 and continue to meet
such criteria as of March 31, 2011. We have therefore
separately presented the assets and liabilities of these
buildings on our interim condensed consolidated balance sheet.
9
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
The table below reflects the assets and liabilities of
properties classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010:
Assets:
Real Estate Investments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
2,302,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,302,000
|
|
Building and improvements, net of accumulated depreciation of
$2,161,000 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
|
|
|
22,238,000
|
|
|
|
22,238,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate investments of properties held for sale,
net
|
|
$
|
24,540,000
|
|
|
$
|
24,540,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense related to our properties classified as
held for sale for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 was $0 and $196,000, respectively.
Assets:
Identified Intangible Assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
In place leases, net of accumulated amortization of $824,000 as
of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,648,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,648,000
|
|
Tenant relationships, net of accumulated amortization of
$376,000 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
|
|
|
2,120,000
|
|
|
|
2,120,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identified intangible assets of properties held for
sale, net
|
|
$
|
3,768,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,768,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense recorded on the identified intangible
assets related to our properties classified as held for sale for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $0 and
$109,000, respectively.
Liabilities:
Identified Intangible Liabilities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Below market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $184,000
as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
|
|
|
369,000
|
|
|
|
369,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identified intangible liabilities of properties held
for sale, net
|
|
$
|
369,000
|
|
|
$
|
369,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense recorded on the identified intangible
liabilities related to our properties classified as held for
sale for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was
$0 and $17,000, respectively, which is recorded to rental income
in our accompanying interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
In accordance with
ASC 205-20,
Presentation of Financial Statements Discontinued
Operations, the operating results of the buildings
classified as held for sale have been reported within
discontinued operations for all periods presented in our interim
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The table below
reflects the results of operations of the properties classified
as held for sale at March 31, 2011, which are included
within discontinued
10
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
operations within the Companys interim Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
830,000
|
|
|
$
|
805,000
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses
|
|
|
86,000
|
|
|
|
86,000
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
86,000
|
|
|
|
391,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before other income (expense)
|
|
$
|
744,000
|
|
|
$
|
414,000
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense related to mortgage loan payables and credit
facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(266,000
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
744,000
|
|
|
$
|
289,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations per common
share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
214,797,450
|
|
|
|
145,335,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
214,996,502
|
|
|
|
145,335,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
Acquisitions during the three months ended March 31,
2011
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we completed
the acquisition of one new, two-building property portfolio as
well as purchased additional buildings within two of our
existing portfolios. The aggregate purchase price of these
properties was $36,314,000. See Note 16, Business
Combinations, for the allocation of the purchase price of the
acquired properties to tangible assets and to identified
intangible assets and liabilities based on their respective fair
values. A portion of the aggregate purchase price for these
acquisitions was initially financed or subsequently secured by
$6,581,000 in mortgage loans payable. Total acquisition-related
expenses of $1,062,000 include amounts for legal fees, closing
costs, due diligence and other costs.
Acquisitions completed during the three months ended
March 31, 2011 are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
Property
|
|
Property Location
|
|
Acquired
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Payable(1)
|
|
|
Phoenix Portfolio Paseo(2)
|
|
Phoenix, AZ
|
|
2/11/11
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,762,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,147,000
|
|
Columbia Portfolio Northern Berkshire(2)
|
|
North Adams, MA
|
|
2/16/11
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
9,182,000
|
|
|
|
4,434,000
|
|
Holston Medical Portfolio
|
|
Bristol, TN
|
|
3/24/11
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
23,370,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,314,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,581,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the amount of the mortgage loan payable assumed or
newly placed on the property in connection with the acquisition
or secured by the property subsequent to acquisition. |
|
(2) |
|
Represent purchases of additional medical office buildings
during the three months ended March 31, 2011 that are
within portfolios we had previously acquired. |
11
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
|
|
4.
|
Real
Estate Notes Receivable, Net
|
On December 1, 2009, we acquired a real estate related
asset in a note receivable secured by the Rush Medical Office
Building, or the Rush Presbyterian Note Receivable, for a total
purchase price of $37,135,000, plus closing costs. The note may
be repaid in full on or within ninety days prior to the maturity
date for a $4,000,000 cancellation of principal due. We acquired
the real estate related asset from an unaffiliated third party.
We financed the purchase price of the real estate related asset
with funds raised through our initial offering. An acquisition
fee of $555,000, or approximately 1.5% of the purchase price,
was paid to our former advisor.
On December 31, 2008, we acquired a real estate related
asset in four notes receivable secured by two buildings located
in Phoenix, Arizona and Berwyn, Illinois, or the Presidential
Note Receivable, for a total purchase price of $15,000,000, plus
closing costs. We acquired the real estate related asset from an
unaffiliated third party. We financed the purchase price of the
real estate related asset with funds raised through our initial
offering. An acquisition fee of $225,000, or approximately 1.5%
of the purchase price, was paid to our former advisor.
Real estate notes receivable, net consisted of the following as
of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Property
|
|
Property Type
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
MacNeal Hospital Medical Office Building Berwyn, Illinois
|
|
Medical Office Building
|
|
|
5.95%
|
(1)
|
|
11/01/11
|
|
$
|
7,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,500,000
|
|
MacNeal Hospital Medical Office Building Berwyn, Illinois
|
|
Medical Office Building
|
|
|
5.95
|
(1)
|
|
11/01/11
|
|
|
7,500,000
|
|
|
|
7,500,000
|
|
St. Lukes Medical Office Building Phoenix, Arizona
|
|
Medical Office Building
|
|
|
5.85
|
(2)
|
|
11/01/11
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
St. Lukes Medical Office Building Phoenix, Arizona
|
|
Medical Office Building
|
|
|
5.85
|
(2)
|
|
11/01/11
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
Rush Presbyterian Medical Office Building Oak Park, Illinois
|
|
Medical Office Building
|
|
|
7.76
|
(3)
|
|
12/01/14
|
|
|
41,150,000
|
|
|
|
41,150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,150,000
|
|
|
|
61,150,000
|
|
Add: Notes receivable closing costs, net(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481,000
|
|
|
|
540,000
|
|
Less: discount, net(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,954,000
|
)
|
|
|
(4,599,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate notes receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,677,000
|
|
|
$
|
57,091,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The effective interest rate associated with these notes as of
March 31, 2011 is 7.93%. |
|
(2) |
|
The effective interest rate associated with these notes as of
March 31, 2011 is 7.80%. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents an average contractual interest rate for the life of
the note with an effective interest rate of 8.6%. |
|
(4) |
|
The closing costs and discount are amortized on a straight-line
basis over the respective life, and impact the yield, of each
note. |
We monitor the credit quality of our real estate notes
receivable portfolio on an ongoing basis by tracking possible
credit quality indicators. As of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, all of our real estate notes receivable
were current and we have not provided for any allowance for
losses on notes receivable. Additionally, as of March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, we have had no impairment with
respect to our notes receivable. We made no significant
purchases or sales of notes or other receivables during the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
12
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Identified
Intangible Assets, Net
|
Identified intangible assets, net for our operating properties
consisted of the following as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
In place leases, net of accumulated amortization of $47,883,000
and $42,361,000 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of
152 months and 154 months as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively).
|
|
$
|
122,637,000
|
|
|
$
|
122,682,000
|
|
Above market leases, net of accumulated amortization of
$6,878,000 and $5,971,000 as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively (with a weighted average
remaining life of 88 months and 89 months as of
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively).
|
|
|
17,057,000
|
|
|
|
17,943,000
|
|
Tenant relationships, net of accumulated amortization of
$28,250,000 and $23,561,000 as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively (with a weighted average
remaining life of 165 months and 168 months as of
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively).
|
|
|
132,043,000
|
|
|
|
133,901,000
|
|
Leasehold interests, net of accumulated amortization of $730,000
and $526,000 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of
841 months and 855 months as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively).
|
|
|
26,593,000
|
|
|
|
26,061,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
298,330,000
|
|
|
$
|
300,587,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For identified intangible assets, net associated with our
properties classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, see Note 3, Real Estate
Investments, Net, Assets Held for Sale, and Discontinued
Operations.
Amortization expense recorded on the identified intangible
assets related to our operating properties for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $11,617,000 and
$7,020,000, respectively, which included $908,000 and $601,000,
respectively, of amortization recorded against rental income for
above market leases and $204,000 and $77,000, respectively, of
amortization recorded against rental expenses for above market
leasehold interests.
13
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Other assets, net for our operating properties consisted of the
following as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of
$3,968,000 and $5,015,000 as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively
|
|
$
|
9,016,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,620,000
|
|
Lease commissions, net of accumulated amortization of $1,351,000
and $1,132,000 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively
|
|
|
5,402,000
|
|
|
|
4,275,000
|
|
Lease inducements, net of accumulated amortization of $582,000
and $527,000 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively
|
|
|
1,220,000
|
|
|
|
1,284,000
|
|
Deferred rent receivable
|
|
|
21,186,000
|
|
|
|
17,422,000
|
|
Prepaid expenses, deposits, and other assets
|
|
|
8,168,000
|
|
|
|
8,951,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
44,992,000
|
|
|
$
|
40,552,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and depreciation expense recorded on deferred
financing costs, lease commissions, lease inducements and other
assets for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
was $1,285,000 and $797,000, respectively, of which $1,012,000
and $481,000, respectively, of amortization was recorded against
interest expense for deferred financing costs and $53,000 and
$169,000, respectively, of amortization was recorded against
rental income for lease inducements in our accompanying interim
condensed consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
7.
|
Mortgage
Loans Payable, Net and Secured Real Estate Term Loan
|
Mortgage loans and secured term loan payable were $725,143,000
($728,101,000, including premium) and $696,558,000
($699,526,000, including premium) as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. As of March 31, 2011,
we had fixed and variable rate mortgage loans and a secured real
estate term loan (discussed in further detail below) with
effective interest rates ranging from 1.74% to 12.75% per annum
and a weighted average effective interest rate of 4.78% per
annum. As of March 31, 2011, we had $475,399,000
($478,357,000, including premium) of fixed rate debt, or 65.6%
of our mortgage loans payable and secured real estate term loan,
at a weighted average interest rate of 6.02% per annum and
$249,744,000 of variable rate debt, or 34.4% of our mortgage
loans payable and secured real estate term loan, at a weighted
average interest rate of 2.42% per annum. As of
December 31, 2010, we had fixed and variable rate mortgage
loans with effective interest rates ranging from 1.61% to 12.75%
per annum and a weighted average effective interest rate of
4.95% per annum. As of December 31, 2010, we had
$470,815,000 ($473,783,000, including premium) of fixed rate
debt, or 67.6% of mortgage loans payable, at a weighted average
interest rate of 6.02% per annum and $225,743,000 of variable
rate debt, or 32.4% of mortgage loans payable, at a weighted
average interest rate of 2.72% per annum.
On February 1, 2011, we closed a senior secured real estate
term loan in the amount of $125,500,000 from Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, or Wells Fargo Bank. The primary purposes
of the term loan included refinancing four Wells Fargo Bank
loans totaling approximately $89,969,000 and providing new
financing on three of our existing properties. Interest is
payable monthly at a rate of one-month LIBOR plus 2.35%, which
currently equates to 2.60%. Including the impact of the interest
rate swap discussed below, the weighted average rate associated
with this term loan is 3.09%. The weighted average rate on these
four loans prior to the refinancing was 4.18% (including the
impact of interest rate swaps). The term loan matures on
December 31, 2013 and includes two
12-month
extension options, subject to the satisfaction of certain
conditions. The loan agreement for the term loan includes
customary financial covenants for loans of this type, including
a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total assets, a minimum
ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges, and a minimum level of
tangible net worth. In addition, the term loan agreement for
this secured term loan includes events of default that we
believe are usual for loans and transactions of this type. The
term loan is secured by 25 buildings within 12 property
14
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
portfolios in 13 states and has a two year period in which
no prepayment is permitted. Our operating partnership has
guaranteed 25% of the principal balance and 100% of the interest
under the term loan.
In anticipation of the term loan, we purchased an interest rate
swap on November 3, 2010, with Wells Fargo Bank as
counterparty, for a notional amount of $75,000,000. The interest
rate swap was amended on January 25, 2011. The interest
rate swap is secured by the pool of assets collateralizing the
secured term loan. The effective date of the swap is
February 1, 2011, and matures no later than
December 31, 2013. The swap will fix one-month LIBOR at
1.0725%, which, when added to the spread of 2.35%, will result
in a total interest rate of approximately 3.42% for $75,000,000
of the term loan during the initial term. We have not designated
these swaps as accounting hedges. As of December 31, 2010, we
had $2,400,000 on deposit in a collateral account related to
this interest rate swap. This amount was reimbursed to us in
full upon the closing of the term loan on February 1, 2011.
We are required by the terms of the applicable loan documents
related to our mortgage loans payable and secured term loan to
meet certain financial covenants, such as debt service coverage
ratios, rent coverage ratios and reporting requirements. As of
March 31, 2011, we believe that we were in compliance with
all such covenants and requirements on our mortgage loans
payable and secured term loan. As of December 31, 2010, we
were in compliance with all such covenants and requirements on
$638,558,000 of our mortgage loans payable and were making
appropriate adjustments to comply with such covenants on
$58,000,000 of our mortgage loans payable by maintaining a
deposit of $12,000,000 within a restricted collateral account.
As discussed in Note 19, Subsequent Events, on May 3,
2011, we paid off this $58,000,000 principal balance and thus
withdrew our deposit of $12,000,000 from the restricted
collateral account.
Mortgage loans payable, net, and secured term loan consisted of
the following as of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
2011(a)
|
|
|
December 31, 2010(b)
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southpointe Office Parke and Epler Parke I
|
|
|
6.11
|
%
|
|
|
09/01/16
|
|
|
$
|
9,093,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,121,000
|
|
Crawfordsville Medical Office Park and Athens Surgery Center
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
|
|
10/01/16
|
|
|
|
4,244,000
|
|
|
|
4,256,000
|
|
The Gallery Professional Building
|
|
|
5.76
|
|
|
|
03/01/17
|
|
|
|
5,995,000
|
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
Lenox Office Park, Building G
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
|
|
02/01/17
|
|
|
|
11,974,000
|
|
|
|
12,000,000
|
|
Commons V Medical Office Building
|
|
|
5.54
|
|
|
|
06/11/17
|
|
|
|
9,635,000
|
|
|
|
9,672,000
|
|
Yorktown Medical Center and Shakerag Medical Center
|
|
|
5.52
|
|
|
|
05/11/17
|
|
|
|
13,388,000
|
|
|
|
13,434,000
|
|
Thunderbird Medical Plaza
|
|
|
5.67
|
|
|
|
06/11/17
|
|
|
|
13,692,000
|
|
|
|
13,740,000
|
|
Gwinnett Professional Center
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
|
|
01/01/14
|
|
|
|
5,390,000
|
|
|
|
5,417,000
|
|
Northmeadow Medical Center
|
|
|
5.99
|
|
|
|
12/01/14
|
|
|
|
7,504,000
|
|
|
|
7,545,000
|
|
Medical Portfolio 2
|
|
|
5.91
|
|
|
|
07/01/13
|
|
|
|
13,970,000
|
|
|
|
14,024,000
|
|
Renaissance Medical Centre
|
|
|
5.38
|
|
|
|
09/01/15
|
|
|
|
18,376,000
|
|
|
|
18,464,000
|
|
Renaissance Medical Centre
|
|
|
12.75
|
|
|
|
09/01/15
|
|
|
|
1,238,000
|
|
|
|
1,240,000
|
|
Medical Portfolio 4
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
06/01/19
|
|
|
|
6,340,000
|
|
|
|
6,404,000
|
|
Medical Portfolio 4
|
|
|
6.18
|
|
|
|
06/01/19
|
|
|
|
1,626,000
|
|
|
|
1,625,000
|
|
Marietta Health Park
|
|
|
5.11
|
|
|
|
11/01/15
|
|
|
|
7,200,000
|
|
|
|
7,200,000
|
|
Hampden Place
|
|
|
5.98
|
|
|
|
01/01/12
|
|
|
|
8,470,000
|
|
|
|
8,551,000
|
|
Greenville Patewood
|
|
|
6.18
|
|
|
|
01/01/16
|
|
|
|
35,499,000
|
|
|
|
35,609,000
|
|
Greenville Greer
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
02/01/17
|
|
|
|
8,387,000
|
|
|
|
8,413,000
|
|
Greenville Memorial
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
02/01/17
|
|
|
|
4,440,000
|
|
|
|
4,454,000
|
|
Greenville MMC
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
06/01/20
|
|
|
|
22,675,000
|
|
|
|
22,743,000
|
|
Sun City-Note B
|
|
|
6.54
|
|
|
|
09/01/14
|
|
|
|
14,751,000
|
|
|
|
14,819,000
|
|
Sun City-Note C
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
|
09/01/14
|
|
|
|
4,375,000
|
|
|
|
4,412,000
|
|
Sun City Note D
|
|
|
6.98
|
|
|
|
09/01/14
|
|
|
|
13,782,000
|
|
|
|
13,839,000
|
|
King Street
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
|
|
03/05/17
|
|
|
|
6,369,000
|
|
|
|
6,429,000
|
|
Wisconsin MOB II Mequon
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
07/10/17
|
|
|
|
9,923,000
|
|
|
|
9,952,000
|
|
Balfour Concord Denton
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
08/10/12
|
|
|
|
4,558,000
|
|
|
|
4,592,000
|
|
Pearland-Broadway
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
|
|
09/01/12
|
|
|
|
2,350,000
|
|
|
|
2,361,000
|
|
7900 Fannin-Note A
|
|
|
7.30
|
|
|
|
01/01/21
|
|
|
|
21,726,000
|
|
|
|
21,783,000
|
|
7900 Fannin-Note B
|
|
|
7.68
|
|
|
|
01/01/16
|
|
|
|
817,000
|
|
|
|
819,000
|
|
Deaconess Evansville
|
|
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
08/06/15
|
|
|
|
21,072,000
|
|
|
|
21,151,000
|
|
Overlook
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
11/05/16
|
|
|
|
5,386,000
|
|
|
|
5,408,000
|
|
15
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
2011(a)
|
|
|
December 31, 2010(b)
|
|
|
Triad
|
|
|
5.60
|
|
|
|
09/01/22
|
|
|
|
11,922,000
|
|
|
|
11,961,000
|
|
Santa Fe Building 1640
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
|
|
07/01/15
|
|
|
|
3,533,000
|
|
|
|
3,555,000
|
|
Rendina Wellington
|
|
|
5.97
|
|
|
|
12/01/16
|
|
|
|
8,277,000
|
|
|
|
8,296,000
|
|
Rendina Gateway
|
|
|
6.49
|
|
|
|
09/01/18
|
|
|
|
10,546,000
|
|
|
|
10,596,000
|
|
Columbia Patroon Creek Note A
|
|
|
6.10
|
|
|
|
06/01/16
|
|
|
|
23,027,000
|
|
|
|
23,123,000
|
|
Columbia Patroon Creek Note B
|
|
|
6.10
|
|
|
|
06/01/16
|
|
|
|
878,000
|
|
|
|
890,000
|
|
Columbia 1092 Madison
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
02/01/18
|
|
|
|
1,995,000
|
|
|
|
2,006,000
|
|
Columbia FL Orthopaedic
|
|
|
5.45
|
|
|
|
07/10/13
|
|
|
|
6,981,000
|
|
|
|
7,041,000
|
|
Columbia Capital Region Health Park
|
|
|
6.51
|
|
|
|
07/10/12
|
|
|
|
22,120,000
|
|
|
|
22,309,000
|
|
Columbia Putnam
|
|
|
5.33
|
|
|
|
05/01/15
|
|
|
|
19,246,000
|
|
|
|
19,329,000
|
|
Columbia CDPHP
|
|
|
5.40
|
|
|
|
06/01/16
|
|
|
|
21,097,000
|
|
|
|
21,182,000
|
|
Phoenix Estrella
|
|
|
6.26
|
|
|
|
08/01/17
|
|
|
|
20,631,000
|
|
|
|
20,695,000
|
|
Phoenix MOB IV
|
|
|
6.01
|
|
|
|
06/11/17
|
|
|
|
4,338,000
|
|
|
|
4,355,000
|
|
Phoenix Paseo
|
|
|
6.32
|
|
|
|
10/11/16
|
|
|
|
2,141,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Columbia N. Berkshire
|
|
|
6.01
|
|
|
|
12/11/12
|
|
|
|
4,422,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed rate debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475,399,000
|
|
|
|
470,815,000
|
|
Variable Rate Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center
|
|
|
1.89
|
(c)
|
|
|
12/30/11
|
|
|
|
21,780,000
|
|
|
|
22,000,000
|
|
Park Place Office Park
|
|
|
1.79
|
(c)
|
|
|
12/31/10
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
10,943,000
|
|
Highlands Ranch Medical Plaza
|
|
|
1.79
|
(c)
|
|
|
12/31/10
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
8,853,000
|
|
Medical Portfolio 1
|
|
|
1.92
|
(c)
|
|
|
02/28/11
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
19,580,000
|
|
Medical Portfolio 3
|
|
|
2.49
|
(c)
|
|
|
06/26/11
|
|
|
|
58,000,000
|
(d)
|
|
|
58,000,000
|
|
SouthCrest Medical Plaza
|
|
|
2.44
|
(c)
|
|
|
06/30/11
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
12,870,000
|
|
Wachovia Pool Loans
|
|
|
4.65
|
(c)
|
|
|
06/30/11
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
48,666,000
|
|
Cypress Station Medical Office Building
|
|
|
1.99
|
(c)
|
|
|
09/01/11
|
|
|
|
7,010,000
|
|
|
|
7,043,000
|
|
Decatur Medical Plaza
|
|
|
2.24
|
(c)
|
|
|
09/26/11
|
|
|
|
7,900,000
|
|
|
|
7,900,000
|
|
Mountain Empire Portfolio
|
|
|
2.34
|
(c)
|
|
|
09/28/11
|
|
|
|
18,290,000
|
|
|
|
18,408,000
|
|
Wells Fargo Secured Real Estate Term Loan
|
|
|
2.59
|
(c)
|
|
|
12/31/13
|
|
|
|
125,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sun City-Sun 1
|
|
|
1.74
|
(c)
|
|
|
12/31/14
|
|
|
|
1,833,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Sun City-Sun 2
|
|
|
1.74
|
(c)
|
|
|
12/31/14
|
|
|
|
9,431,000
|
|
|
|
9,480,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variable rate debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,744,000
|
|
|
|
225,743,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed and variable debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725,143,000
|
|
|
|
696,558,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Net premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,958,000
|
|
|
|
2,968,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans payable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
728,101,000
|
|
|
$
|
699,526,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As of March 31, 2011, we had variable rate mortgage loans
on 6 of our properties, as well as a secured real estate term
loan secured by certain of our properties, with effective
interest rates ranging from 1.74% to 2.59% per annum and a
weighted average effective interest rate of 2.42% per annum.
However, as of March 31, 2011, we had fixed rate interest
rate swaps on our Decatur and Mountain Empire variable rate
mortgage loans payable as well as on $75,000,000 of our secured
real estate term loan, thereby effectively fixing our interest
rates on those debt instruments at 5.16%, 5.87%, and 3.42%,
respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
As of December 31, 2010, we had variable rate mortgage
loans on 15 of our properties with effective interest rates
ranging from 1.76% to 4.65% per annum and a weighted average
effective interest rate of 2.72% per annum. However, as of
December 31, 2010, we had fixed rate interest rate swaps
and caps on our Medical Portfolio 1, Decatur, Mountain Empire,
and Sun City-Sun 2 variable rate mortgage loans payable, thereby
effectively fixing our interest rates on those mortgage loans
payable at 5.23%, 5.16%, 5.87%, and 2.00%, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents the interest rate in effect as of March 31, 2011. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents a loan balance that was paid off on May 3, 2011,
as discussed further in Note 19, Subsequent Events. |
|
(e) |
|
Represent bank loans, the aggregate principal balance of which
as of December 31, 2010 was $89,969,000, which were
refinanced using the proceeds of our $125,500,000 senior secured
real estate term loan, as discussed above within this
Note 7. We closed on this term loan with Wells Fargo Bank
on February 1, 2011. |
|
(f) |
|
Represents a loan balance that we have paid off during the three
months ended March 31, 2011. |
16
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
As of March 31, 2011, the principal payments due on our
mortgage loans payable and secured term loan for the nine months
ending December 31, 2011 and for each of the next four
years ending December 31 and thereafter is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
119,211,000
|
|
2012
|
|
|
48,748,000
|
|
2013
|
|
|
153,391,000
|
|
2014
|
|
|
50,121,000
|
|
2015
|
|
|
80,567,000
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
273,105,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
725,143,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table above does not reflect all available extension
options. Of the amounts maturing in 2011, $58,000,000 was paid
in full on May 3, 2011, as further discussed in
Note 19, Subsequent Events, $33,200,000 have two
one-year
extensions available and $21,780,000 has a one-year extension
available. At present, there are no extension options associated
with our debt that matures in 2012.
|
|
8.
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments
|
ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, or ASC 815, establishes
accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments,
including certain derivative instruments embedded in other
contracts, and for hedging activities. We utilize derivatives
such as fixed interest rate swaps and interest rate caps to add
stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to
interest rate movements. Consistent with ASC 815, we record
derivative financial instruments on our accompanying Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as either an asset or a liability
measured at fair value. ASC 815 permits special hedge
accounting if certain requirements are met. Hedge accounting
allows for gains and losses on derivatives designated as hedges
to be offset by the change in value of the hedged item(s) or to
be deferred in other comprehensive income.
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, no
derivatives were designated as fair value hedges or cash flow
hedges. Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative
and are used to manage our exposure to interest rate movements,
but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements of
ASC 815. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial
instruments are recorded in gain on derivative financial
instruments in our accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations.
The following table lists the derivative financial instruments
held by us as of March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
Index
|
|
Rate
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Instrument
|
|
Maturity
|
|
$
|
7,900,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.16
|
|
|
|
(131,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
09/26/11
|
|
|
16,830,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.87
|
|
|
|
(1,080,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
09/28/13
|
|
|
75,000,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
3.42
|
|
|
|
460,000
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
12/31/13
|
|
|
9,443,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
408,000
|
|
|
Cap
|
|
|
12/31/14
|
|
The following table lists the derivative financial instruments
held by us as of December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
Index
|
|
Rate
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Instrument
|
|
Maturity
|
|
$
|
19,507,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.23
|
|
|
|
(109,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
01/31/11
|
|
|
7,900,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.16
|
|
|
|
(185,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
09/26/11
|
|
|
16,912,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.87
|
|
|
|
(1,233,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
09/28/13
|
|
|
75,000,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
3.42
|
|
|
|
297,000
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
12/31/13
|
|
|
9,480,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
383,000
|
|
|
Cap
|
|
|
12/31/14
|
|
17
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair
value of our derivative financial instruments was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
Derivatives not designated as
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
hedging instruments:
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
$
|
460,000
|
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
$
|
297,000
|
|
|
Derivative
Financial
Instruments
|
|
$
|
1,211,000
|
|
|
Derivative
Financial
Instruments
|
|
$
|
1,527,000
|
|
Interest Rate Cap
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
$
|
408,000
|
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
$
|
383,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, our
derivative financial instruments associated with our operating
properties had the following effect on our condensed
consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized
|
Derivatives not designated as
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
hedging instruments:
|
|
Recognized
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
479,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,756,000
|
|
Interest rate cap
|
|
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
(195,000
|
)
|
We have agreements with each of our interest rate swap
derivative counterparties that contain a provision whereby if we
default on certain of our unsecured indebtedness, then we could
also be declared in default on our interest rate swap derivative
obligations resulting in an acceleration of payment. In
addition, we are exposed to credit risk in the event of
non-performance by our derivative counterparties. We believe we
mitigate our credit risk by entering into agreements with
credit-worthy counterparties. We record counterparty credit risk
valuation adjustments on interest rate swap derivative assets in
order to properly reflect the credit quality of the
counterparty. In addition, our fair value of interest rate swap
derivative liabilities is adjusted to reflect the impact of our
credit quality. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, there have been no termination events or events of default
related to the interest rate swaps.
|
|
9.
|
Revolving
Credit Facility
|
On November 22, 2010, we entered into a credit agreement,
or the credit agreement, with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
administrative agent, or JPMorgan, Wells Fargo Bank and Deutsche
Bank Securities Inc., as syndication agents, U.S. Bank
National Association and Fifth Third Bank, as documentation
agents, and the lenders named therein to obtain an unsecured
revolving credit facility in an aggregate maximum principal
amount of $275,000,000, or the unsecured credit facility,
subject to increase as described below. In anticipation of this
new credit facility, we voluntarily closed on August 19,
2010 the $80,000,000 secured revolving facility we originally
entered into in 2007. No borrowings were made on this previous
credit facility during the years ended December 31, 2010 or
2009.
The actual amount of credit available under the credit agreement
is a function of certain
loan-to-cost,
loan-to-value
and debt service coverage ratios contained in the credit
agreement. Subject to the terms of the credit agreement, the
maximum principal amount of the credit agreement may be
increased, subject to such additional financing being offered
and provided by existing lenders or new lenders under the credit
agreement. Borrowings under this revolving credit facility
accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to the Adjusted LIBO
Rate plus a margin ranging from 2.50% to 3.50% based on our
operating partnerships total leverage ratio, which we
refer to as Eurodollar loans. Our operating partnership is
required to pay a fee on the unused portion of the lenders
commitments under the credit agreement at a rate dependent on
the proportion of the average daily used amount to the
lenders commitments. The margin associated with borrowings
during the three months ended March 31, 2011 was 2.50% and
the average daily commitment fee for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 was 0.5% per annum. As of March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, we had $0 and $7,000,000,
respectively, outstanding on our unsecured revolving credit
facility. The $7,000,000 drawn as of December 31, 2010 for
the purpose of funding the acquisition of operating properties
was repaid in full on January 31, 2011.
18
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
The credit agreement contains various affirmative and negative
covenants that we believe are usual for facilities and
transactions of this type, including limitations on the
incurrence of debt by us, our operating partnership and its
subsidiaries that own unencumbered assets, limitations on the
nature of our operating partnerships business, and
limitations on distributions by our operating partnership and
its subsidiaries that own unencumbered assets. Pursuant to the
credit agreement, beginning with the quarter ending
September 30, 2011, our operating partnership may not make
cash distribution payments to us and we may not make cash
distributions to our stockholders in excess of the greater of:
(i) 100% of normalized adjusted FFO (as defined in the
credit agreement) for the period of four quarters ending
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2011,
(ii) 95% of normalized adjusted FFO for the period of four
quarters ending March 31, 2012 and (iii) 90% of
normalized adjusted FFO for the period of four quarters ending
June 30, 2012 and thereafter. Shares of our common stock
issued under the DRIP are not subject to the limitation on
distribution payments. Additionally, the credit agreement also
imposes a number of financial covenants on us and our operating
partnership, including: a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to
total asset value, a minimum ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges, a
minimum tangible net worth covenant, a maximum ratio of
unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value; a minimum
ratio of unencumbered net operating income to unsecured
indebtedness; and a minimum ratio of unencumbered asset value to
total commitments. As of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with these
covenants. In addition, the credit agreement includes events of
default that we believe are usual for facilities and
transactions of this type, including restricting us from making
distributions to our stockholders in the event we are in default
under the credit agreement, except to the extent necessary for
us to maintain our REIT status.
As further discussed in Note 19, Subsequent Events, on
May 13, 2011, we increased the aggregate maximum principal
amount available under this credit facility from $275,000,000 to
$575,000,000 as well as extended the maturity date of the credit
facility from November 2013 to May 2014.
|
|
10.
|
Identified
Intangible Liabilities, Net
|
Identified intangible liabilities, net for our operating
properties consisted of the following as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Below market leases, net of accumulated amortization of
$5,140,000 and $4,550,000 as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively (with a weighted average
remaining life of 215 months and 213 months as of
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively).
|
|
$
|
8,982,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,271,000
|
|
Below market leasehold interests, net of accumulated
amortization of $66,000 and $40,000 as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively (with a weighted
average remaining life of 736 months and 738 months as
of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively).
|
|
$
|
3,760,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,788,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,742,000
|
|
|
$
|
13,059,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For identified intangible liabilities, net associated with our
properties classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, see Note 3, Real Estate
Investments, Net, Assets Held for Sale, and Discontinued
Operations.
Amortization expense recorded on the identified intangible
liabilities attributable to our operating properties for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $433,000 and
$426,000, respectively, which is recorded to rental income in
our accompanying interim condensed consolidated statements of
operations.
19
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Litigation
We are not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to
our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us,
which if determined unfavorably to us, would have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
Environmental
Matters
We follow the policy of monitoring our properties for the
presence of hazardous or toxic substances. While there can be no
assurance that a material environmental liability does not exist
at our properties, we are not currently aware of any
environmental liability with respect to our properties that
would have a material effect on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows. Further, we are
not aware of any material environmental liability or any
unasserted claim or assessment with respect to an environmental
liability that we believe would require additional disclosure or
the recording of a loss contingency.
Other
Organizational and Offering Expenses
As a self-managed company, we are responsible for all of our
current and future organizational and offering expenses,
including those incurred in connection with our follow-on
offering, which terminated on February 28, 2011, except for
shares issued pursuant to the DRIP. These other organizational
and offering expenses include all expenses (other than selling
commissions and dealer manager fees, which generally represent
7.0% and 3.0% of our gross offering proceeds, respectively) paid
by us in connection with our follow-on offering.
Tax
Status
We have requested a closing agreement with the Internal Revenue
Service, or IRS, granting us relief for any preferential
dividends we may have paid. Preferential dividends cannot be
used to satisfy the REIT distribution requirements. In 2007,
2008 and through July 2009, shares of common stock issued
pursuant to our DRIP were treated as issued as of the first day
following the close of the month for which the distributions
were declared, and not on the date that the cash distributions
were paid to stockholders not participating in our DRIP. Because
we declare distributions on a daily basis, including with
respect to shares of common stock issued pursuant to our DRIP,
the IRS could take the position that distributions paid by us
during these periods were preferential. In addition, during the
six months beginning September 2009 through February 2010, we
paid certain IRA custodial fees with respect to IRA accounts
that invested in our shares. The payment of such amounts could
also be treated as dividend distributions to the IRAs, and
therefore could result in our being treated as having made
additional preferential dividends to our stockholders.
We cannot assure you that the IRS will accept our proposal for a
closing agreement. Even if the IRS accepts our proposal, we may
be required to pay a penalty if the IRS were to view the prior
operation of our DRIP or the payment of such fees as
preferential dividends. We cannot predict whether such a penalty
would be imposed or, if so, the amount of the penalty. If the
IRS does not agree to our proposal for a closing agreement and
treats the foregoing amounts as preferential dividends, we would
likely rely on the deficiency dividend provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, to
address our continued qualification as a REIT and to satisfy our
distribution requirements. We estimate the range of loss that is
reasonably possible is from $60,000 to $150,000 if we obtain the
closing agreement. If we cannot obtain a closing agreement, we
would likely pursue the deficiency dividend procedure which
would require us to pay a penalty of approximately $500,000.
20
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Other
Our other commitments and contingencies include the usual
obligations of real estate owners and operators in the normal
course of business. In our opinion, these matters are not
expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
12.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Upon the effectiveness of our initial offering on
September 20, 2006, we entered into the Advisory Agreement
with Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT Advisor, LLC, or
our former advisor, and Grubb & Ellis Realty
Investors, LLC, or GERI, and a dealer manager agreement with
Grubb & Ellis Securities, Inc., our former dealer
manager. These agreements entitled our former advisor, our
former dealer manager and their affiliates to specified
compensation for certain services as well as reimbursement of
certain expenses.
In 2008, we announced our plans to transition to a self-managed
company. As part of our transition to self management, on
November 14, 2008, we amended and restated the Advisory
Agreement effective as of October 24, 2008 to reduce
acquisition and asset management fees, to eliminate the need to
pay disposition or internalization fees, to set the framework
for our transition to self-management and to create an
enterprise value for our company. On November 14, 2008, as
part of our transition to self-management, we also amended the
partnership agreement for our operating partnership. Pursuant to
the terms of the partnership agreement as amended, our former
advisor had the ability to elect to defer its right, if
applicable, to receive a subordinated distribution from our
operating partnership after the termination or expiration of the
advisory agreement upon certain liquidity events if specified
stockholder return thresholds were met. This right was subject
to a number of conditions and had been the subject of dispute
between the parties, as well as monetary and other claims.
On May 21, 2009, we provided notice to Grubb &
Ellis Securities that we would proceed with a dealer manager
transition pursuant to which Grubb & Ellis Securities
ceased to serve as our dealer manager for our initial offering
at the end of the day on August 28, 2009. Commencing
August 29, 2009, Realty Capital Securities, LLC, an
unaffiliated third party, assumed the role of dealer manager for
the remainder of the offering period. The Advisory Agreement
expired in accordance with its terms on September 20, 2009.
On October 18, 2010, we and our former advisor and certain
of its affiliates entered into a redemption, termination and
release agreement, or the Redemption Agreement. Pursuant to
the Redemption Agreement, we purchased the limited partner
interest, including all rights with respect to a subordinated
distribution upon the occurrence of specified liquidity events
and other rights held by our former advisor in our operating
partnership, for $8,000,000. In addition, pursuant to the
Redemption Agreement the parties resolved all monetary
claims and other matters between them, and entered into certain
mutual and other releases of the parties. We believe that the
execution of the Redemption Agreement represents the final
stage of our successful separation from Grubb & Ellis
and that the Redemption Agreement further positions us to
take advantage of potential strategic opportunities in the
future.
|
|
13.
|
Redeemable
Noncontrolling Interest of Limited Partners
|
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we owned
an approximately 99.93% and an approximately 99.92%,
respectively, general partner interest in our operating
partnership. As of March 31, 2011, and December 31,
2010, approximately 0.07% and 0.08% of our operating partnership
was owned by individual physician investors that elected to
exchange their partnership interests in the partnership that
owns the 7900 Fannin medical office building for limited partner
units of our operating partnership. We acquired the majority
interest in the Fannin partnership on June 30, 2010. In
aggregate, as of March 31, 2011, approximately 0.07% of the
earnings of our operating partnership are allocated to
redeemable noncontrolling interest of limited partners.
21
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
On June 30, 2010, we completed the acquisition of the
majority interest in the Fannin partnership, which owns the 7900
Fannin medical office building located in Houston, Texas on the
Texas Medical Center campus. At closing, we acquired the general
partner interest and 84% of the limited partner interests in the
Fannin partnership. The original physician investors were
provided the right to remain in the Fannin partnership, receive
limited partner units in our operating partnership,
and/or
receive cash. Some of the original physician investors elected
to remain in the Fannin partnership post-closing as limited
partners. Those investors electing to remain in the Fannin
partnership or to receive limited partner units in our operating
partnership were provided opportunities for future redemption of
their interests/units, exercisable at the option of the holder
during periods specified within the agreement.
As of December 31, 2009, we owned an 80.0% interest in the
JV Company that owns the Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center,
which was originally purchased on December 20, 2007. The
redeemable noncontrolling interest balance related to this
arrangement at December 31, 2009 was comprised of the
noncontrolling interests initial contribution, 20.0% of
the earnings at the Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center, and
accretion of the change in the redemption value over the period
from the purchase date to January 1, 2011, the earliest
redemption date. On March 24, 2010, our subsidiary
exercised its call option to buy, for $3,900,000, 100% of the
interest owned by its joint venture partner, BD St. Louis,
in the JV Company. As a result of the closing of the purchase on
March 24, 2010, we own a 100% interest in the Chesterfield
Rehabilitation Center, and the associated redeemable
noncontrolling interest balance related to this entity was
reduced to zero.
Redeemable noncontrolling interests are accounted for in
accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities From
Equity, or ASC 480, at the greater of their carrying
amount or redemption value at the end of each reporting period.
Changes in the redemption value from the purchase date to the
earliest redemption date are accreted using the straight-line
method. Additionally, as the noncontrolling interests provide
for redemption features not solely within the control of the
issuer, we classify such interests outside of permanent equity
in accordance with Accounting Series Release 268:
Presentation in the Financial Statements of Redeemable
Preferred Stock, as applied in ASU
No. 2009-4,
Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments. As of
March 31, 2011 and 2010, redeemable noncontrolling interest
of limited partners was $3,889,000 and $196,000, respectively.
Below is a table reflecting the activity of the redeemable
noncontrolling interests.
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
3,549,000
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest of limited
partners
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(87,000
|
)
|
Valuation adjustment to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
570,000
|
|
Purchase of Chesterfield 20% interest
|
|
|
(3,900,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
196,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
3,867,000
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest of limited
partners
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(18,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
3,889,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $40,000 in net income attributable to noncontrolling
interest shown on our March 31, 2011 interim condensed
consolidated Statement of Operations reflects net income
attributable to the Fannin partnership during the three months
ended March 31, 2011.
The $64,000 in net income attributable to noncontrolling
interest shown on our March 31, 2010 interim condensed
consolidated Statement of Operations reflected net income earned
by the noncontrolling interest in the JV Company prior to our
purchase of this interest on March 24, 2010. As such, there
was no additional net income attributable to the JV Company
beyond this amount during the remainder of 2010. The net impact
to our equity in 2010 as a result of this purchase was $275,000.
22
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Common
Stock
Through March 31, 2011, we granted an aggregate of
833,500 shares of restricted common stock to our
independent directors, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, Executive Vice President Acquisitions, and
other employees pursuant to the terms and conditions of our 2006
Incentive Plan and Amended 2006 Incentive Plan, employment
agreements, and the employee retention program described in our
2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
filed on March 25, 2011. Through March 31, 2011, we
issued 219,425,524 shares of our common stock in connection
with our initial offering and follow-on offering and
13,529,822 shares of our common stock under the DRIP, and
we repurchased 8,109,867 shares of our common stock under
our share repurchase plan. As of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, we had 225,679,179 and
202,643,705 shares of our common stock outstanding,
respectively.
Pursuant to our follow-on offering, we offered to the public up
to 200,000,000 shares of our $0.01 par value common
stock for $10.00 per share and up to 21,052,632 shares of
our $0.01 par value common stock pursuant to the DRIP at
$9.50 per share. Our charter authorizes us to issue
1,000,000,000 shares of our common stock. On
February 28, 2011, we stopped offering shares in our
primary offering. However, for noncustodial accounts,
subscription agreements signed on or before February 28,
2011 with all documents and funds received by end of business
March 15, 2011 were accepted. For custodial accounts,
subscription agreements signed on or before February 28,
2011 with all documents and funds received by end of business
March 31, 2011 were accepted.
On December 20, 2010, our stockholders approved an
amendment to our charter to provide for the reclassification and
conversion of our common stock in the event our shares are
listed on a national securities exchange to implement a phased
in liquidity program. We proposed these amendments and submitted
them for approval by our stockholders to prepare our company in
the event we pursue a listing. Under the phased in liquidity
program, our common stock would reclassify and convert into
shares of Class A common stock and Class B common
stock immediately prior to a listing. In the event of a listing,
the shares of Class A common stock would be immediately
listed on a national securities exchange. The shares of
Class B common stock would not be listed. Rather, those
shares would convert into shares of Class A common stock
and become listed in defined phases, over a defined period of
time within 18 months of a listing. The phased in liquidity
program is intended to provide for our stock to be transitioned
into the public market in a way that minimizes the stock-pricing
instability that could result from concentrated sales of our
stock.
Preferred
Stock
Our charter authorizes us to issue 200,000,000 shares of
our $0.01 par value preferred stock. As of March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, no shares of preferred stock
were issued and outstanding.
Distribution
Reinvestment Plan
We adopted the DRIP that allows stockholders to purchase
additional shares of common stock through the reinvestment of
distributions, subject to certain conditions. We registered and
reserved 21,052,632 shares of our common stock for sale
pursuant to the DRIP in our initial offering and we registered
and reserved 21,052,632 shares of our common stock for sale
pursuant to the DRIP in our follow-on offering. For the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, $17,651,000 and
$12,522,000, respectively, in distributions were reinvested and
1,857,957 and 1,318,102 shares of our common stock,
respectively, were issued under the DRIP. As of March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, a total of $128,533,000 and
$110,882,000, respectively, in distributions were reinvested and
13,529,822 and 11,671,865 shares of our common stock,
respectively, were issued under the DRIP. With the termination
of our follow-on offering on February 28, 2011, except for
the DRIP, we will periodically review potential alternatives for
our DRIP, including the suspension or termination of the plan.
23
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Share
Repurchase Plan
Our board of directors has approved a share repurchase plan that
allows for share repurchases by us when certain criteria are met
by requesting stockholders. Share repurchases will be made at
the sole discretion of our board of directors. On
November 24, 2010, we, with the approval of our board of
directors and at its sole discretion, elected to amend and
restate our share repurchase plan. Starting in the first
calendar quarter of 2011, we will fund a maximum of
$10 million of share repurchase requests per quarter,
subject to available funding. Funds for the repurchase of shares
of our common stock will come exclusively from the proceeds we
receive from the sale of shares of our common stock under the
DRIP during the relevant quarter. In addition, with the
termination of our follow-on offering on February 28, 2011,
except for the DRIP, we will periodically review potential
alternatives for our share repurchase plan, including the
suspension or termination of the plan.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we
repurchased 821,848 shares of our common stock for an
aggregate amount of $7,916,000 and 899,399 shares of our
common stock for an aggregate amount of $8,533,000,
respectively. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, we had repurchased a total of 8,109,867 shares of our
common stock for an aggregate amount of $77,115,000 and
7,288,019 shares of our common stock for an aggregate
amount of $69,199,000, respectively.
Amended
and Restated 2006 Incentive Plan and 2006 Independent Directors
Compensation Plan
On February 24, 2011, as a result of our Compensation
Committees and Board of Directors comprehensive
review of our compensation structure, our Board of Directors
amended and restated our 2006 Incentive Plan, or the Amended and
Restated 2006 Plan. Consistent with the original plan, the
Amended and Restated 2006 Plan permits the grant of incentive
awards to our employees, officers, non-employee directors, and
consultants as selected by our Board or the Compensation
Committee. Our philosophy regarding compensation is to structure
employee compensation to promote and reward performance-based
behavior, which results in risk-managed, added value to our
Company and stockholders. The plan is designed to provide
maximum flexibility to our Company consistent with our current
size, the stage of our life cycle, and our overall strategic
plan. As and when our Board and Compensation Committee determine
various performance-based awards, the details of such awards,
such as vesting terms and post-termination exercise periods,
will be addressed in the individual award agreements.
The Amended and Restated 2006 Incentive Plan authorizes the
granting of awards in any of the following forms: options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted or deferred
stock units, performance awards, dividend equivalents, other
stock-based awards, including units in operating partnership,
and cash-based awards. Subject to adjustment as provided in the
Amended and Restated 2006 Incentive Plan, the aggregate number
of shares of our common stock reserved and available for
issuance pursuant to awards granted under the Amended and
Restated 2006 Incentive Plan is 10,000,000 (which includes
2,000,000 shares originally reserved for issuance under the
plan and 8,000,000 new shares added pursuant to the amendment
and restatement).
Unless otherwise provided in an award certificate or any special
plan document governing an award, upon the termination of a
participants service due to death or disability (as
defined in the Amended and Restated 2006 Incentive Plan),
(1) all of that participants outstanding options and
stock appreciation rights will become fully vested and
exercisable; (2) all time-based vesting restrictions on
that participants outstanding awards will lapse; and
(3) the payout level under all of that participants
outstanding performance-based awards will be determined and
deemed to have been earned based upon an assumed achievement of
all relevant performance goals at the target level,
and the awards will payout on a pro rata basis, based on the
time within the performance period that has elapsed prior to the
date of termination.
Unless otherwise provided in an award certificate or any special
plan document governing an award, upon the occurrence of a
change in control of the company (as defined in the Amended and
Restated 2006 Incentive Plan) in which awards are not assumed by
the surviving entity or otherwise equitably converted or
substituted in connection with the change in control in a manner
approved by the compensation committee or our board of
directors: (1) all outstanding options and stock
appreciation rights will become fully vested and exercisable;
(2) all
24
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
time-based vesting restrictions on outstanding awards will lapse
as of the date of termination; and (3) the payout level
under outstanding performance-based awards will be determined
and deemed to have been earned as of the effective date of the
change in control based upon an assumed achievement of all
relevant performance goals at the target level, and
the awards will payout on a pro rata basis, based on the time
within the performance period that has elapsed prior to the
change in control. With respect to awards assumed by the
surviving entity or otherwise equitably converted or substituted
in connection with a change in control, if within one year after
the effective date of the change in control, a
participants employment is terminated without cause or the
participant resigns for good reason (as such terms are defined
in the Amended and Restated 2006 Incentive Plan), then:
(1) all of that participants outstanding options and
stock appreciation rights will become fully vested and
exercisable; (2) all time-based vesting restrictions on
that participants outstanding awards will lapse as of the
date of termination; and (3) the payout level under all of
that participants performance-based awards that were
outstanding immediately prior to effective time of the change in
control will be determined and deemed to have been earned as of
the date of termination based upon an assumed achievement of all
relevant performance goals at the target level, and
the awards will payout on a pro rata basis, based on the time
within the performance period that has elapsed prior to the date
of termination.
The fair value of each share of restricted common stock and
restricted common stock unit that has been granted under the
plan is estimated at the date of grant at $10.00 per share, the
per share price of shares in our initial and follow-on
offerings, and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the
vesting period. Shares of restricted common stock and restricted
common stock units may not be sold, transferred, exchanged,
assigned, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise encumbered. Such
restrictions expire upon vesting.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we
recognized compensation expense of $897,000 and $156,000,
respectively, related to the restricted common stock grants.
Such compensation expense is included in general and
administrative expenses in our accompanying interim condensed
consolidated statements of operations. Shares of restricted
common stock have full voting rights and rights to dividends.
Shares of restricted common stock units do not have voting
rights or rights to dividends.
A portion of our awards may be paid in cash in lieu of stock in
accordance with the respective employment agreement and vesting
schedule of such awards. These awards are revalued every
reporting period end with the cash redemption liability
reflected on our consolidated balance sheets, if material. For
the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31,
2010, 25,000 shares and 0 shares, respectively, were
settled in cash.
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there was
approximately $6,106,000 and $4,143,000, respectively, of total
unrecognized compensation expense net of estimated forfeitures,
related to nonvested shares of restricted common stock. As of
March 31, 2011, this expense is expected to be recognized
over a remaining weighted average period of 2.4 years.
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair
value of the nonvested shares of restricted common stock and
restricted common stock units was $6,962,000 and $4,352,000,
respectively. A summary of the status of the nonvested shares of
restricted common stock and restricted common stock units as of
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and the changes
for the three months ended March 31, 2011, is presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Average Grant
|
|
|
|
Stock/Units
|
|
|
Date Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2010
|
|
|
435,168
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
Granted, net
|
|
|
286,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2011
|
|
|
696,168
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested Shares Expected to vest
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
696,168
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
|
|
15.
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
|
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, or
ASC 820, defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is a
market-based measurement, as opposed to a transaction-specific
measurement and most of the provisions were effective for our
consolidated financial statements beginning January 1, 2008.
Fair value is defined by ASC 820 as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. Depending on the nature of the asset or
liability, various techniques and assumptions can be used to
estimate the fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are
measured using inputs from three levels of the fair value
hierarchy, as follows:
Level 1 Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted)
in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we
have the ability to access at the measurement date. An active
market is defined as a market in which transactions for the
assets or liabilities occur with sufficient frequency and volume
to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2 Inputs include quoted prices for
similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices
for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that
are not active (markets with few transactions), inputs other
than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or
liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs
that derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data correlation or other means (market corroborated
inputs).
Level 3 Unobservable inputs, only used to the
extent that observable inputs are not available, reflect our
assumptions about the pricing of an asset or liability.
ASC 825, Financial Instruments, or ASC 825, requires
disclosure of fair value of financial instruments in interim
financial statements as well as in annual financial statements.
We use fair value measurements to record fair value of certain
assets and to estimate fair value of financial instruments not
recorded at fair value but required to be disclosed at fair
value.
Financial
Instruments Reported at Fair Value
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
We invest in money market funds which are classified within
Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued
using unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for
identical securities.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
Currently, we use interest rate swaps and interest rate caps to
manage interest rate risk associated with floating rate debt.
The valuation of these instruments is determined by a
third-party expert using a proprietary model that utilizes
widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash
flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative, and
observable inputs. As such, we classify these inputs as
Level 2 inputs. The proprietary model reflects the
contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to
maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including
interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and implied
volatilities. The fair values of interest rate swaps and
interest rate caps are determined using the market standard
methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments
and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable
cash receipts are based on an expectation of future interest
rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest
rate curves.
26
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
To comply with the provisions of ASC 820, we incorporate
credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our
own nonperformance risk and the respective counterpartys
nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting
the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of
nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting
and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral
postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used
to value our interest rate swap and interest rate cap
derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with
these instruments utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates
of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default
by us and our counterparties. However, as of March 31,
2011, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the
credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our
interest rate swap and interest rate cap derivative positions
and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are
not significant to their overall valuation. As a result, we have
determined that our interest rate swap and interest rate cap
derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in
Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
As of March 31, 2011, there have been no transfers of
assets or liabilities between levels.
Assets
and Liabilities at Fair Value
The table below presents our assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2011,
aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which
those measurements fall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Liabilities
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1 )
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
43,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,000
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
868,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
868,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
43,000
|
|
|
$
|
868,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
911,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,211,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,211,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,211,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,211,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below presents our assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010,
aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which
those measurements fall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Liabilities
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1 )
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
43,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
680,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
680,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
43,000
|
|
|
$
|
680,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
723,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,527,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,527,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,527,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,527,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Financial
Instruments Disclosed at Fair Value
ASC 825 requires disclosure of the fair value of financial
instruments, whether or not recognized on the face of the
balance sheet. Fair value is defined under ASC 820.
Our accompanying consolidated balance sheets include the
following financial instruments: real estate notes receivable,
net, cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts and
other receivables, net, accounts payable and accrued
liabilities, accounts payable due to affiliates, net, mortgage
loans payable, net, and borrowings under the credit facility.
We consider the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents,
restricted cash, accounts and other receivables, net, and
accounts payable and accrued liabilities to approximate fair
value for these financial instruments because of the short
period of time between origination of the instruments and their
expected realization.
The fair value of the mortgage loan payable is estimated using
borrowing rates available to us for mortgage loans payable with
similar terms and maturities. As of March 31, 2011, the
fair value of the mortgage loans payable was $752,376,000
compared to the carrying value of $728,101,000. As of
December 31, 2010, the fair value of the mortgage loans
payable was $727,370,000 compared to the carrying value of
$699,526,000.
The fair value of the notes receivable is estimated by
discounting the expected cash flows on the notes at current
rates at which management believes similar loans would be made.
The fair value of these notes was approximately $67,079,000 and
approximately $67,540,000 at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively, as compared to the
carrying values of approximately $57,677,000 and approximately
$57,091,000 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively.
|
|
16.
|
Business
Combinations
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we completed the
acquisition of one new property portfolio as well as expanded
two of our existing property portfolios through the purchase of
an additional medical office building within each, adding a
total of approximately 188,000 square feet of GLA to our
property portfolio. The aggregate purchase price for these
acquisitions was $36,314,000 plus closing costs of $336,000. See
Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, Assets Held for Sale,
and Discontinued Operations, for a listing of the properties
acquired and the dates of acquisition. Results of operations for
the property acquisitions are reflected in our interim condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 for the periods subsequent to the
acquisition dates.
As of March 31, 2011, the aggregate purchase price was
allocated in the amount of $945,000 to land, $24,539,000 to
building and improvements, $1,794,000 to tenant improvements,
$852,000 to lease commissions, $4,867,000 to leases in place,
$2,887,000 to tenant relationships, $603,000 to above market
leasehold interest in land, $(76,000) to above market debt,
$20,000 to above market leases, and $(117,000) to below market
leases.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we completed the
acquisition of eight property portfolios as well as purchased
the remaining 20% interest in the JV Company that owns the
Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center, adding a total of
approximately 672,000 square feet of GLA to our overall
portfolio. The aggregate purchase price associated with these
acquisitions was $145,890,000 plus closing costs of $1,603,000.
The aggregate purchase price was allocated in the amount of
$8,241,000 to land, $100,173,000 to building and improvements,
$6,813,000 to tenant improvements, $3,797,000 to lease
commissions, $7,596,000 to leases in place, $10,232,000 to
tenant relationships, $(190,000) to leasehold interest in land,
$245,000 to above market debt, and $3,532,000 to above market
leases. These amounts pertained to all acquisitions during the
quarter except for the Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center
noncontrolling interest purchase, which was accounted for as an
equity transaction and thus it is not included within the
aggregate purchase price allocation disclosed herein.
Additionally, the allocable portion of the aggregate purchase
price did not include $1,551,000 in certain credits
representative of contingent
28
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
purchase price adjustments and liabilities assumed by us that
served to reduce the total cash tendered for these acquisitions.
In accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations,
or ASC 805, we, with assistance from independent
valuation specialists, allocate the purchase price of acquired
properties to tangible and identified intangible assets and
liabilities based on their respective fair values. The
allocation to tangible assets (building and land) is based upon
our determination of the value of the property as if it were to
be replaced and vacant using discounted cash flow models similar
to those used by independent appraisers. Factors considered by
us include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected
lease-up
periods considering current market conditions and costs to
execute similar leases. Additionally, the purchase price of the
applicable property is allocated to the above or below market
value of in place leases, the value of in place leases, tenant
relationships, above or below market debt assumed, and any
contingent consideration transferred in the combination.
As of March 31, 2011, we owned one property, purchased
during the third quarter of 2010, which is subject to an earnout
provision obligating us to pay additional consideration to the
seller contingent on the future leasing and occupancy of vacant
space at the property. This earn out payment is based on a
predetermined formula and has a set
24-month
time period regarding the obligation to make these payments. If,
at the end of this time period, which expires June 30,
2012, certain space has not been leased and occupied, we will
have no further obligation. Assuming all conditions are
satisfied under the earn out agreement, we, at the time of
acquisition, calculated that we would be obligated to pay an
estimated $1,752,000 to the seller. Upon review of this item of
contingent consideration as of March 31, 2011, we
determined that no material change to this valuation was
warranted. As of March 31, 2011 no payments under the
earnout agreement have been made.
Brief descriptions of the property acquisitions completed for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
An approximately 20,000 square foot medical office building
located in Phoenix, Arizona, which was purchased on
February 11, 2011 for $3,762,000. This acquisition
represented the final building of three in our existing Phoenix
portfolio; the other two buildings comprising this portfolio
were purchased during the fourth quarter of 2010.
|
|
|
|
An approximately 47,000 square foot building located in
North Adams, Massachusetts, which was purchased on
February 16, 2011 for $9,182,000. This building was the
final building within a portfolio of nine medical office
buildings located in Albany and Carmel, New York, North Adams,
Massachusetts, and Temple Terrace, Florida; the other eight
buildings comprising the portfolio were purchased during the
fourth quarter of 2010.
|
|
|
|
A two-building portfolio located in Bristol Tennessee, which was
purchased on March 24, 2011 for an aggregate price of
$23,370,000. The first building, an approximately
40,000 square foot medical office building, was purchased
for $5,925,000, and the second, an approximately
81,000 square foot medical office building, was purchased
for $17,445,000. Both buildings within this portfolio are
located near the campus of Wellmont Health Systems Bristol
Regional Medical Center.
|
We recorded revenues and net losses for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 of approximately $233,000 and $(325,000),
respectively, related to the above acquisitions. Net losses
include $245,000 in closing cost expenses related to the
acquisitions.
Supplementary
Pro-Forma Information
Assuming the property acquisitions discussed above had occurred
on January 1, 2011, for the three months ended
March 31, 2011, pro forma revenues, net income and net
income per basic and diluted share would have been $69,074,000,
$2,556,000 and $0.01, respectively.
29
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Assuming the property acquisitions discussed above had occurred
on January 1, 2010, for the three months ended
March 31, 2010, pro forma revenues, net loss and net loss
per basic and diluted share would have been $43,203,000,
$(196,000) and $(0.00), respectively.
The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results that would have been obtained had the
acquisitions occurred at the beginning of the periods presented,
nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results.
|
|
17.
|
Concentration
of Credit Risk
|
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a
concentration of credit risk are primarily cash and cash
equivalents, restricted cash, and accounts receivable from
tenants. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
we had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash accounts in
excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC,
insured limits. We believe this risk is not significant.
Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable
from tenants is limited. We perform credit evaluations of
prospective tenants, and security deposits are obtained upon
lease execution. In addition, we evaluate tenants in connection
with the acquisition of a property.
As of March 31, 2011, we had interests in 16 consolidated
properties located in Texas, which accounted for 14.7% of our
annualized rental income, interests in five consolidated
properties located in South Carolina, which accounted for 10.1%
of our annualized rental income, interests in seven consolidated
properties located in Arizona, which accounted for 9.63% of our
annualized rental income, interests in 10 consolidated
properties in Florida, which accounted for 8.7% of our
annualized rental income, and interests in seven consolidated
properties located in Indiana, which accounted for 8.6% of our
annualized rental income. This rental income is based on
contractual base rent from leases in effect as of March 31,
2011. Accordingly, there is a geographic concentration of risk
subject to fluctuations in each states economy.
As of March 31, 2010, we had interests in 12 consolidated
properties located in Texas which accounted for 15.2% of our
annualized rental income, and interests in six consolidated
properties located in Indiana, which accounted for 11.6% of our
annualized rental income. This rental income is based on
contractual base rent from leases in effect as of March 31,
2010. Accordingly, there is a geographic concentration of risk
subject to fluctuations in each states economy.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, none of our tenants at our consolidated properties
accounted for 10.0% or more of our aggregate annual rental
income.
We report earnings (loss) per share pursuant to ASC 260,
Earnings Per Share, or ASC 260. We include unvested
share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights
to dividends or dividend equivalents as participating
securities in the computation of basic and diluted income
per share pursuant to the two-class method as described in
ASC 260. We have two classes of common stock for purposes
of calculating our earnings per share. These classes are our
common stock and our restricted stock. For the three month
period ended March 31, 2011, all of our earnings were
distributed and the calculated earnings per share amount would
be the same for both classes as they all have the same rights to
distributed earnings.
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable for each of the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are computed by
dividing net income (loss), reduced by the amount of dividends
declared in the current period, by the weighted average number
of shares of our common stock outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings (loss) per share are computed based on the
weighted average number of shares of our common stock and all
potentially dilutive securities, if any. For the three months
ended March 31, 2011, our potentially dilutive securities
did not
30
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
have a material impact to our earnings per share. For the three
months ended March 31, 2010, we did not have any securities
that gave rise to potentially dilutive shares of our common
stock.
The following table illustrates the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per share for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1,446,000
|
|
|
$
|
(771,000
|
)
|
(Income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest of limited
partners
|
|
|
(40,000
|
)
|
|
|
(64,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to controlling
interest
|
|
|
1,406,000
|
|
|
|
(835,000
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
744,000
|
|
|
|
289,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest
|
|
|
2,150,000
|
|
|
|
(546,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
214,797,450
|
|
|
|
145,335,661
|
|
Dilutive restricted stock(1)
|
|
|
199,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
214,996,502
|
|
|
|
145,335,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to controlling interest
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, restricted stock
does not factor into the calculation for weighted average number
of shares outstanding diluted because, given our net
loss position during that quarter, such restricted stock would
have been antidilutive in nature. |
The significant events that occurred subsequent to the balance
sheet date but prior to the filing of this report that would
have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements
are summarized below.
Financing
On May 13, 2011, we increased our unsecured revolving
credit facility from an aggregate maximum principal of
$275,000,000 to $575,000,000 as well as extended its maturity
date from November 2013 to May 2014.
On May 3, 2011, we paid off the $58,000,000 principal
balance associated with our Medical Portfolio 3 variable rate
mortgage loan payable. In conjunction with this paydown, we
withdrew the $12,000,000 that had previously been placed into a
restricted collateral account in order to comply with certain
financial covenants on this mortgage loan.
31
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Share
Repurchases
In April 2011, we repurchased 1,017,161 shares of our
common stock, for an aggregate amount of $9,821,000, under our
share repurchase plan. We were unable to repurchase a total of
3,729,557 shares requested to be repurchased due to the
limitations of our share repurchase plan. We initially funded
less than $10,000,000 of share repurchase requests for the first
quarter of 2011 because certain stockholders making requests did
not provide all necessary documentation prior to the repurchase
date. We intend to use the remaining $179,000 available for
first quarter repurchases to repurchase additional shares from
stockholders who submitted requests for the first quarter and
provided all necessary documentation prior to the repurchase
date.
32
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
The use of the words we, us or
our refers to Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. and
its subsidiaries, including Healthcare Trust of America
Holdings, LP, except where the context otherwise requires.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our
accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements
and notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
as well as with the audited consolidated financial statements,
accompanying notes, and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included in our 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
as filed with the SEC on March 25, 2011. Such interim
condensed consolidated financial statements and information have
been prepared to reflect our financial position as of
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, together with
our results of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, and cash flows for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Forward-Looking
Statements
Historical results and trends should not be taken as indicative
of future operations. Our statements contained in this report
that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results may differ
materially from those included in the forward-looking
statements. We intend those forward-looking statements to be
covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking
statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of
complying with those safe-harbor provisions. Forward-looking
statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe
future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally
identifiable by use of the words may,
will, should, continue,
believe, expect, intend,
anticipate, estimate,
project, prospects, or similar
expressions. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect
of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors
which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and
future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not
limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in economic conditions generally and the real estate and
healthcare markets specifically;
|
|
|
|
legislative and regulatory changes impacting the healthcare
industry, including the implementation of the healthcare reform
legislation enacted in 2010;
|
|
|
|
legislative and regulatory changes impacting real estate
investment trusts, or REITs, including their taxation;
|
|
|
|
the success of strategic alternatives, including potential
liquidity alternatives;
|
|
|
|
the availability of cash flow from operating activities for
distributions;
|
|
|
|
the availability of debt and equity capital;
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates;
|
|
|
|
competition in the real estate industry;
|
|
|
|
the supply and demand for operating properties in our proposed
market areas;
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, or GAAP;
|
|
|
|
factors that could affect our ability to qualify as a
REIT; and
|
|
|
|
the risk factors in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K and this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
|
Important factors currently known to management that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those in
forward-looking statements, and that could negatively affect our
business are discussed in our Annual Report on
33
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, as well as our
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
under the heading Risk Factors.
Forward-looking statements express expectations of future
events. All forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain
as they are based on various expectations and assumptions
concerning future events and they are subject to numerous known
and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
events or results to differ materially from those projected. Due
to these inherent uncertainties, the investment community is
urged not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
In addition, we undertake no obligation to update or revise
forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the
occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to projections
over time. As a result of these and other factors, our stock
prices may fluctuate dramatically.
These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating
forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be
placed on such statements. Additional information concerning us
and our business, including additional factors that could
materially affect our financial results, is included herein and
in our other filings with the SEC.
Overview
and Background
Healthcare Trust of America, Inc., a Maryland corporation, was
incorporated on April 20, 2006. We were initially
capitalized on April 28, 2006, and therefore, we consider
that our date of inception.
Company
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we completed
one new portfolio acquisition and expanded two of our existing
portfolios through the purchase of additional medical office
buildings within each for an aggregate purchase price of
$36,314,000. These purchases consist of four buildings comprised
of approximately 188,000 square feet of GLA, bringing our
total portfolio value, based on purchase price, to
$2,302,673,000 and our total portfolio GLA to
11,107,000 square feet as of March 31, 2011. The
weighted average occupancy rate associated with the purchases
completed during the three months ended March 31, 2011 was
91% as of March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
Our acquisition and portfolio performance this quarter has
resulted in net operating income, or NOI, growth of
approximately 51% as compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2010. In addition, we had quarter over quarter
NOI growth of 19% compared to the fourth quarter of 2010. NOI is
a non-GAAP financial measure. For a reconciliation of NOI to net
income (loss), see Net Operating Income.
|
|
|
|
The occupancy rate on our portfolio of properties remained
consistent at 91% as of March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, our funds from
operations, or FFO, has increased by 73% to $28,836,000 from
$16,714,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. FFO
is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a reconciliation of FFO to
net income (loss), see Funds from Operations and Modified
Funds from Operations.
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, our modified
funds from operations, or MFFO, was $29,898,000. MFFO is a
non-GAAP financial measure. For a reconciliation of MFFO to net
income (loss), see Funds from Operations and Modified
Funds from Operations below.
|
|
|
|
On May 13, 2011, we successfully increased our unsecured
revolving credit facility from an aggregate maximum principal of
$275,000,000 to $575,000,000 as well as extended its maturity
date from November 2013 to May 2014. We believe our strong cash
position and leverage ratio of approximately 30% (both of which
are further discussed below) in combination with our unsecured
credit facility provides us the capacity to continue with our
business plan of disciplined growth and stockholder value
enhancement.
|
|
|
|
We had cash on hand of $207,405,000 at March 31, 2011 and
the leverage ratio of our mortgage and secured term loans
payable debt to total assets was approximately 30%.
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
We closed a senior secured real estate term loan in the amount
of $125,500,000 on February 1, 2011. We used the proceeds
from this term loan to refinance a total of $89,969,000 of our
2010 and 2011 debt maturities and to provide new financing on
three of our existing properties. The interest rate associated
with this loan, excluding the impact of interest rate swap
instruments, is one-month LIBOR plus 2.35%, which currently
equates to 2.60%. Including the impact of the interest rate swap
discussed in Note 8, Derivative Financial Instruments, to
our interim condensed consolidated financial statements, the
weighted average rate associated with this term loan is
approximately 3.09%. This reduced our cost of capital on these
loans by more than 25% compared to the weighted average rate of
4.18% (including the impact of interest rate swaps) we were
previously paying on the refinanced debt.
|
|
|
|
We received and accepted subscriptions of common stock of
$215,649,000 in the first quarter of 2011 pursuant to our
follow-on offering and closed this offering on February 28,
2011, except for the DRIP.
|
Company
Description
We are a fully integrated, self-administered, and self-managed
REIT. Accordingly, our internal management team manages our
day-to-day
operations and oversees and supervises our employees and outside
service providers. Acquisitions and asset management services
are performed in-house by our employees, with certain monitored
services provided by third parties at market rates. We do not
pay acquisition, disposition, or asset management fees to an
external advisor, and we have not and will not pay any
internalization fees.
We provide stockholders the potential for income and growth
through investment in a diversified portfolio of real estate
properties. We focus primarily on medical office buildings and
healthcare-related facilities. We also invest to a limited
extent in other real estate-related assets. However, we do not
presently intend to invest more than 15.0% of our total assets
in such other real estate-related assets. We focus primarily on
investments that produce recurring income. Subject to the
discussion in Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, to
our accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements regarding the closing agreement that we requested
from the IRS, we believe that we have qualified to be taxed as a
REIT for federal income tax purposes and we intend to continue
to be taxed as a REIT. We conduct substantially all of our
operations through Healthcare Trust of America Holdings, LP, or
our operating partnership.
We are one of the largest public healthcare REITs focused
primarily on high-quality medical office buildings in the United
States, and we own an approximately $2.3 billion healthcare
real estate portfolio (based on purchase price) consisting
predominantly of institutional quality medical office buildings.
Approximately 94% of our medical office portfolio is comprised
of buildings that are: (1) located on or in close proximity
to key hospital-based campuses or (2) aligned with
recognized healthcare systems. The remaining buildings in our
medical office portfolio are either free-standing or part of
medical office complexes.
Our portfolio is geographically diverse, with properties in
25 states. It is concentrated in locations that we have
determined to be strategic based on demographic trends and
projected demand for healthcare, such as Texas, Arizona, South
Carolina, Indiana, and Florida. We believe our portfolio
provides stable and growing in-place revenue, with average
occupancy as of March 31, 2011 of approximately 91%, and
also provides built-in value-add opportunities, including
increased occupancy and future development opportunities.
Additionally, we believe our portfolio provides us with a broad
and innovative platform to establish and further grow key
relationships with healthcare providers, developers, real estate
professionals, and others. Growth opportunities are complemented
and enhanced by our proven and disciplined acquisition
capability, high-quality and stable existing tenant base,
conservative and low-leveraged balance sheet, experienced senior
management team, and strong degree of financial flexibility.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we completed
one new, two-building portfolio acquisition and expanded two of
our existing portfolios through the purchase of an additional
building in each. The aggregate purchase price of these
acquisitions was $36,314,000, and the capitalization rates
associated with these acquisitions ranged from 7.59% to 8.69%,
with a weighted average capitalization rate of 8.04%.
Capitalization rates are calculated by dividing the
propertys estimated annualized first year net operating
income, existing at the date of acquisition, by the contract
purchase price of the property, excluding closing costs and
acquisition expenses. Estimated first year net operating income
on our real estate investments represents total estimated gross
income
35
(rental income, tenant reimbursements, and other
property-related income) derived from the terms of in-place
leases at the time we acquire the property, less property and
related expenses (including property operating and maintenance
expenses, real estate taxes, property insurance, and management
fees) based on the operating history of the property. Estimated
first year net operating income on new acquisitions excludes
other non-property income and expenses, interest expense from
financings, depreciation and amortization, and our company-level
general and administrative expenses. Historical operating income
for these properties is not necessarily indicative of future
operating results.
As of March 31, 2011, we had made 78 portfolio acquisitions
comprising approximately 11,107,000 square feet of GLA,
which includes 242 buildings and two real estate-related assets.
Additionally, in 2010, we purchased the remaining 20% interest
that we previously did not own in HTA-Duke Chesterfield Rehab,
LLC, or the JV Company that owns the Chesterfield Rehabilitation
Center. The aggregate purchase price of these acquisitions was
$2,302,673,000.
On September 20, 2006, we commenced a best efforts initial
public offering, or our initial offering, in which we offered up
to 200,000,000 shares of our common stock for $10.00 per
share in a primary offering and up to 21,052,632 shares of
our common stock pursuant to our DRIP at $9.50 per share,
aggregating up to $2,200,000,000. As of March 19, 2010, the
date upon which our initial offering terminated, we had received
and accepted subscriptions in our initial offering for
147,562,354 shares of our common stock, or $1,474,062,000,
excluding shares of our common stock issued under the DRIP.
On March 19, 2010, we commenced a best efforts follow-on
public offering, or our follow-on offering, in which we offered
up to 200,000,000 shares of our common stock for $10.00 per
share in our primary offering and up to 21,052,632 shares
of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP at $9.50 per share,
aggregating up to $2,200,000,000. We stopped offering shares in
our primary offering on February 28, 2011, but continue to
offer shares issued under the DRIP; however, we may terminate
the DRIP at any time. For noncustodial accounts, subscription
agreements signed on or before February 28, 2011 with all
documents and funds received by the end of business
March 15, 2011 were accepted. For custodial accounts,
subscription agreements signed on or before February 28,
2011 with all documents and funds received by the end of
business March 31, 2011 were accepted. As of March 31,
2011, we had received and accepted subscriptions in our
follow-on offering for 72,219,583 shares of our common
stock, or $721,183,000, excluding shares of our common stock
issued under the DRIP.
Our principal executive offices are located at
16435 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 320, Scottsdale,
Arizona, 85254. Our telephone number is
(480) 998-3478.
For investor services, contact DST Systems, Inc. by telephone at
(888) 801-0107.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The complete listing of our Critical Accounting Policies was
previously disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as filed with the SEC on March 25, 2011, and there have
been no material changes to our Critical Accounting Policies as
disclosed therein.
Interim
Unaudited Financial Data
Our accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared by us in accordance with GAAP in
conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain
information and footnote disclosures required for annual
financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to
SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, our accompanying interim
condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all
of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete
financial statements. Our accompanying interim condensed
consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which
are, in our opinion, of a normal recurring nature and necessary
for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for the interim period. Interim
results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the full year; such results may be
less favorable. Our accompanying interim condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with our
audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
included in our 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as filed with the SEC on March 25, 2011.
36
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements,
to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements,
for a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements.
Acquisitions
Completed During the Three Months Ended March 31,
2011
See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, Assets Held for
Sale, and Discontinued Operations, to our accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements, for a listing of the
properties acquired and the dates of acquisition.
Status
and Performance of Our Offerings
On February 28, 2011, we terminated our follow-on offering
(except for the DRIP). However, for noncustodial accounts,
subscription agreements signed on or before February 28,
2011 with all documents and funds received by end of business
March 15, 2011 were accepted. For custodial accounts,
subscription agreements signed on or before February 28,
2011 with all documents and funds received by end of business
March 31, 2011 were accepted. From January 1, 2011
through March 31, 2011, we had received and accepted
subscriptions in our follow-on offering for
21,615,344 shares of our common stock, for an aggregate
amount of $215,649,000, excluding shares of our common stock
issued under the DRIP. In aggregate, as of March 31, 2011,
we accepted subscriptions in our initial and follow-on offerings
for 219,781,937 shares of our common stock, for a total of
$2,195,245,000, excluding shares of our common stock issued
under the DRIP. We continue to offer shares pursuant to the
DRIP; however, we may terminate the DRIP at any time.
Financing
Unsecured
Credit Facility
On May 13, 2011, we successfully increased the maximum
aggregate principal amount available under our unsecured
revolving credit facility from $275,000,000 to $575,000,000.
Additionally, we extended the maturity date of the credit
facility from November 2013 to May 2014. As further discussed in
Note 9, Revolving Credit Facility, to our accompanying
interim condensed consolidated financial statements, we
originally obtained this credit facility in November 2010.
Secured
Real Estate Term Loan
On February 1, 2011, we closed a senior secured real estate
term loan in the amount of $125,500,000 from Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, or Wells Fargo Bank. The primary purposes
of the term loan included refinancing four Wells Fargo Bank
loans totaling approximately $89,969,000 and providing new
financing on three of our existing properties. Interest is
payable monthly at a rate of one-month LIBOR plus 2.35%, which
currently equates to 2.60%. Including the impact of the interest
rate swap discussed below, the weighted average rate associated
with this term loan is 3.09%. This is lower than the weighted
average rate of 4.18% (including the impact of interest rate
swaps) on the four refinanced loans. The term loan matures on
December 31, 2013 and includes two
12-month
extension options, subject to the satisfaction of certain
conditions. The loan agreement for the term loan includes
customary financial covenants for loans of this type, including
a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total assets, a minimum
ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges, and a minimum level of
tangible net worth. In addition, the term loan agreement for
this secured term loan includes events of default that we
believe are usual for loans and transactions of this type. The
term loan is secured by 25 buildings within 12 property
portfolios in 13 states and has a two year period in which
no prepayment is permitted. Our operating partnership has
guaranteed 25% of the principal balance and 100% of the interest
under the term loan.
37
In anticipation of the term loan, we purchased an interest rate
swap on November 3, 2010, with Wells Fargo Bank as
counterparty, for a notional amount of $75,000,000. The interest
rate swap was amended on January 25, 2011. The interest
rate swap is secured by the pool of assets collateralizing the
secured term loan. The effective date of the swap is
February 1, 2011, and it matures no later than
December 31, 2013. The swap serves to fix one-month LIBOR
at 1.0725%, which when added to the spread of 2.35%, will result
in a total interest rate of approximately 3.42% for $75,000,000
of the term loan during the initial term.
Factors
Which May Influence Results of Operations
We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, other
than national economic conditions affecting real estate and
healthcare generally, that may reasonably be expected to have a
material impact, favorable or unfavorable, on revenues or income
from the acquisition, management and operation of properties
other than those listed in Part II, Item 1A of this
report and those Risk Factors previously disclosed in our 2010
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as filed with the SEC on March 25, 2011.
Rental
Income
The amount of rental income generated by our operating
properties depends principally on our ability to maintain our
current occupancy rates and to lease currently available space
and space available from unscheduled lease terminations at the
existing rental rates. Negative trends in one or more of these
factors could adversely affect our rental income in future
periods.
Scheduled
Lease Expirations
As of March 31, 2011, our consolidated properties were
approximately 91% occupied. Over the next 12 months, for
the period ending March 31, 2012, leases related to 6.05%
of the occupied GLA will expire. Our leasing strategy for 2011
focuses on negotiating renewals for leases scheduled to expire
during the remainder of the year. If we are unable to negotiate
such renewals, we will try to identify new tenants or
collaborate with existing tenants who are seeking additional
space to occupy. Of the leases expiring in 2011, we anticipate,
but cannot assure, that a majority of the tenants will renew
their leases for another term.
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and
2010
Our operating results, as presented below, are primarily
comprised of income derived from our portfolio of operating
properties. For results of the four buildings within one of our
portfolios that were classified as held for sale as of
March 31, 2011, see Note 3, Real Estate Investments,
Net, Assets Held for Sale, and Discontinued Operations, to our
accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
Except where otherwise noted, the change in our results of
operations is primarily due to the 78 geographically diverse
portfolio acquisitions we had made as of March 31, 2011 as
compared to the 63 geographically diverse portfolio acquisitions
we had made as of March 31, 2010.
Rental
Income
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, rental income
attributable to our operating properties was $68,413,000 as
compared to $42,309,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2010. For the three months ended March 31,
2011, rental income was primarily comprised of base rent of
$49,687,000 and expense recoveries of $12,423,000. For the three
months ended March 31, 2010, rental income was primarily
comprised of base rent of $30,533,000 and expense recoveries of
$9,052,000.
38
Rental
Expenses
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, rental
expenses attributable to our operating properties were
$23,772,000 and $14,585,000, respectively. Rental expenses
consisted of the following for the periods then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
$
|
7,812,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,252,000
|
|
Building maintenance
|
|
|
4,095,000
|
|
|
|
3,727,000
|
|
Utilities
|
|
|
4,538,000
|
|
|
|
2,889,000
|
|
Property management fees
|
|
|
925,000
|
|
|
|
658,000
|
|
Administration
|
|
|
1,182,000
|
|
|
|
977,000
|
|
Grounds maintenance
|
|
|
1,460,000
|
|
|
|
1,082,000
|
|
Non-recoverable operating expenses
|
|
|
1,373,000
|
|
|
|
637,000
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
464,000
|
|
|
|
276,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,923,000
|
|
|
|
87,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rental expenses
|
|
$
|
23,772,000
|
|
|
$
|
14,585,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and Administrative Expenses
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, general
and administrative expenses attributable to our operating
properties were $7,308,000 and $3,605,000, respectively. General
and administrative expenses include such costs as professional
and legal fees, salaries, share-based compensation expense,
investor services expense, corporate office overhead, and bad
debt expense, among others.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the increase in
total general and administrative expenses of $3,703,000 was
primarily due to the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in the number of employees hired as of
March 31, 2011 commensurate with the increased size of our
portfolio and the associated increase in our level of operating
activity. As of March 31, 2011, we had approximately
51 employees, as compared to 40 employees as of
March 31, 2010. The associated increases in salaries
expense, restricted stock compensation expense, and corporate
office overhead in order to accommodate our growing portfolio of
properties and increased level of activity accounted for
$2,129,000 of the overall
year-over-year
increase in general and administrative expense.
|
|
|
|
A net increase in investor services expense of $433,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2010, which was largely driven by an
increase in the number of our stockholders period over period.
|
|
|
|
An increase in bank charges, taxes, and legal and professional
fees of approximately $569,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 as compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2010, each of which was primarily related to the
increased size of our portfolio of properties.
|
|
|
|
An increase in bad debt expense of $278,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2010, which was the result of the increase in the
size of our portfolio and related accounts receivable balance as
well as our continual review of our tenant receivable balances.
|
Acquisition-Related
Expenses
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
acquisition-related expenses were $1,062,000 and $3,224,000,
respectively. The decrease in acquisition expenses was due to a
decrease in acquisition activity as compared to the prior year
comparable quarter. For the three months ended March 31,
2011, we made one new two-building portfolio acquisition and
expanded two of our existing portfolios through the purchase of
an additional medical office building within each for an
aggregate purchase price of $36,314,000. For the three
39
months ended March 31, 2010, we completed eight new
portfolio acquisitions, as well as acquired the remaining 20%
interest in the JV Company that owns Chesterfield Rehabilitation
Center for an aggregate purchase price of $145,890,000.
Depreciation
and Amortization
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
depreciation and amortization attributable to our operating
properties was $26,750,000 and $17,006,000, respectively. See
Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, Assets Held for Sale,
and Discontinued Operations, to our accompanying interim
condensed consolidated financial statements for further
information on depreciation of our properties. For information
regarding the amortization recorded on our identified intangible
assets and on our lease commissions, see Note 5, Identified
Intangible Assets Net, and Note 6, Other Assets, Net,
respectively, to our accompanying interim condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Interest
Expense and Net Gain on Derivative Instruments
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
interest expense and net gain on derivative financial
instruments associated with our operating properties were
$9,842,000 and $7,315,000, respectively. Interest expense and
gain on derivative financial instruments associated with our
operating properties consisted of the following for the periods
then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Interest expense on our mortgage loans payable and derivative
financial instruments
|
|
$
|
9,060,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,182,000
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees associated with our
mortgage loans payable
|
|
|
660,000
|
|
|
|
386,000
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees associated with our
credit facility
|
|
|
353,000
|
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
Amortization of debt discount/premium
|
|
|
(85,000
|
)
|
|
|
159,000
|
|
Unused credit facility fees
|
|
|
358,000
|
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
10,346,000
|
|
|
|
8,876,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on change in fair value of derivative financial
instruments
|
|
|
(504,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,561,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense and net gain on derivative financial
instruments
|
|
$
|
9,842,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,315,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 35% increase in interest expense for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 as compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2010 was primarily due to an increase in average
outstanding mortgage loans payable of $713,814,000 as of
March 31, 2011 compared to $536,684,000 as of
March 31, 2010. This increase was offset by a net gain on
the change in fair value of derivative financial instruments due
to a non-cash mark to market adjustment we made on our interest
rate swaps and cap of $504,000 during the three months ended
March 31, 2011 as compared to a net gain on the change in
fair value of our derivative financial instruments of $1,561,000
during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
We use interest rate swaps and interest rate caps in order to
minimize the impact of fluctuations in interest rates. To
achieve our objectives, we borrow at fixed rates and variable
rates. We also enter into derivative financial instruments such
as interest rate swaps and interest rate caps in order to
mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial
instrument. We do not enter into derivative or interest rate
transactions for speculative purposes. Derivatives not
designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage
our exposure to interest rate movements.
40
Interest
and Dividend Income
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, interest and
dividend income was $118,000 as compared to $16,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2010. For the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, interest and dividend income
was related primarily to interest earned on our operating or
money market accounts. The increase was driven by a higher cash
balance of $207,405,000 as of the three months ended
March 31, 2011 as compared to $128,404,000 as of the three
months ended March 31, 2010.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We are dependent upon the proceeds from our operating cash
flows, the proceeds from debt, and the net proceeds of our
offerings to conduct our activities. We stopped offering shares
in our primary offering as of February 28, 2011. We
continue to offer shares pursuant to our DRIP; however, we may
terminate our DRIP at any time. We may also conduct additional
public offerings of our common stock in the future. Our ability
to raise funds is dependent on general economic conditions,
general market conditions for REITs, and our operating
performance. The capital required to purchase real estate and
other real estate related assets is obtained from our offerings
and from any indebtedness that we may incur.
Our principal demands for funds continue to be for acquisitions
of real estate and other real estate related assets, to pay
operating expenses and interest on our outstanding indebtedness,
and to make distributions to our stockholders.
Generally, cash needs for items other than acquisitions of real
estate and other real estate related assets continue to be met
from operations, borrowings, and the net proceeds of our
offerings. We believe that these cash resources will be
sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for the foreseeable
future, and we do not anticipate a need to raise funds from
other than these sources within the next 12 months.
Additionally, we do not anticipate significant cash needs to
meet our debt maturities coming due during the year ended
December 31, 2011, as all such maturities provide for
extension options and we plan to exercise all such options
available to us.
We evaluate potential additional investments and engage in
negotiations with real estate sellers, developers, brokers,
investment managers, lenders and others. Until we invest the
remaining proceeds of our offerings in properties and other real
estate related assets, we may invest in short-term, highly
liquid or other authorized investments. Such short-term
investments will not earn significant returns, and we cannot
predict how long it will take to fully invest the proceeds in
real estate and other real estate related assets. The number of
properties we may acquire and other investments we will make
depends upon the net proceeds from our offerings that are
available for investment and the amount of debt financing
available to us. We have not fully invested the proceeds of our
offerings to date, which could result in a delay in the benefits
to our stockholders, if any, of returns generated from our
investments operations.
When we acquire a property, we prepare a capital plan that
contemplates the estimated capital needs of that investment. In
addition to operating expenses, capital needs may also include
costs of refurbishment, tenant improvements, or other major
capital expenditures. The capital plan also sets forth the
anticipated sources of the necessary capital, which may include
a line of credit or other loan established with respect to the
investment, operating cash generated by the investment,
additional equity investments from us or joint venture partners
or, when necessary, capital reserves. Any capital reserve would
be established from the gross proceeds of our offerings,
proceeds from sales of other investments, operating cash
generated by other investments or other cash on hand. In some
cases, a lender may require us to establish capital reserves for
a particular investment. The capital plan for each investment
will be adjusted through ongoing, regular reviews of our
portfolio or as necessary to respond to unanticipated additional
capital needs.
Other
Liquidity Needs
In the event that there is a shortfall in net cash available due
to various factors, including, without limitation, the timing of
distributions or the timing of the collections of receivables,
we may seek to obtain capital to pay distributions by means of
secured or unsecured debt financing through one or more third
parties. We may also pay
41
distributions from cash from capital transactions, including,
without limitation, the sale of one or more of our properties.
As of March 31, 2011, we estimate that our expenditures for
capital improvements will require up to approximately
$31,429,000, $19,415,000 of which is attributable to tenant
improvements, for the remaining nine months of 2011. As of
March 31, 2011, we had $7,842,000 of restricted cash in
loan impounds and reserve accounts for such capital
expenditures. We cannot provide assurance, however, that we will
not exceed these estimated expenditure levels or be able to
obtain additional sources of financing on commercially favorable
terms or at all.
If we experience lower occupancy levels, reduced rental rates,
reduced revenues as a result of asset sales, or increased
capital expenditures and leasing costs compared to historical
levels due to competitive market conditions for new and renewal
leases, the effect would be a reduction of net cash provided by
operating activities. If such a reduction of net cash provided
by operating activities is realized, we may have a cash flow
deficit in subsequent periods. Our estimate of net cash
available is based on various assumptions which are difficult to
predict, including the levels of leasing activity and related
leasing costs. Any changes in these assumptions could impact our
financial results and our ability to fund working capital and
unanticipated cash needs.
Cash
Flows
Cash flows provided by operating activities for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, were $25,110,000 and
$12,546,000, respectively. For the three months ended
March 31, 2011, cash flows provided by operating activities
related primarily to operations from our 76 property portfolios
and two real estate related assets. For the three months ended
March 31, 2010, cash flows provided by operating activities
related primarily to operations from our 61 property portfolios
and two real estate related assets. We anticipate cash flows
from operating activities to continue to increase as we purchase
more properties.
Cash flows used in investing activities for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, were $28,472,000 and
$155,602,000, respectively. For the three months ended
March 31, 2011, cash flows used in investing activities
related primarily to the acquisition of real estate operating
properties in the amount of $29,733,000. For the three months
ended March 31, 2010, cash flows used in investing
activities related primarily to the acquisition of real estate
operating properties in the amount of $133,639,000. We
anticipate that, throughout the year, cash flows used in
investing activities will increase as we purchase more
properties.
Cash flows provided by financing activities for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, were $181,497,000 and
$52,459,000, respectively. For the three months ended
March 31, 2011, cash flows provided by financing activities
related primarily to proceeds from issuance of common stock in
the amount of $210,210,000, borrowings on our secured term loan
in the amount of $125,500,000, payments made on our unsecured
revolving line of credit of $7,000,000, the payment of offering
costs of $15,002,000 for our offerings, distributions to our
stockholders of $19,320,000 and principal repayments of
$103,496,000 on mortgage loans payable. Additional cash outflows
related to debt financing costs of $1,555,000 in connection with
the debt financing for our acquisitions. For the three months
ended March 31, 2010, cash flows provided by financing
activities related primarily to proceeds from the issuance of
common stock in the amount of $104,608,000 and borrowings on
mortgage loans payable of $13,000,000, the payment of offering
costs of $12,898,000 for our offerings, distributions to our
stockholders of $12,838,000 and principal repayments of
$26,205,000 on mortgage loans payable. Additional cash outflows
related to our purchase of the noncontrolling interest in the JV
Company that owns Chesterfield Rehabilitation center for
$3,900,000 as well as to debt financing costs of $994,000 in
connection with the debt financing for our acquisitions.
Distributions
The amount of the distributions we pay to our stockholders is
determined by our board of directors and is dependent on a
number of factors, including funds available for payment of
distributions, our financial condition, capital expenditure
requirements and annual distribution requirements needed to
maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, as well as any liquidity alternative we may
pursue in the
42
future. Additionally, our unsecured revolving credit agreement
contains various affirmative and negative covenants that we
believe are usual for facilities and transactions of this type,
including limitations on distributions by our operating
partnership and its subsidiaries that own unencumbered assets.
Pursuant to the credit agreement, beginning with the quarter
ending September 30, 2011, our operating partnership may
not make cash distribution payments to us in excess of the
greater of: (i) 100% of normalized adjusted FFO (as defined
in the credit agreement) for the period of four quarters ending
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2011,
(ii) 95% of normalized adjusted FFO for the period of four
quarters ending March 31, 2012, and (iii) 90% of
normalized adjusted FFO for the period of four quarters ending
June 30, 2012 and thereafter. We believe that we will
satisfy this financial covenant, beginning with the quarter
ending September 30, 2011.
We have paid distributions monthly since February 2007 and, if
our investments produce sufficient cash flow, we expect to
continue to pay distributions to our stockholders on a monthly
basis. However, our board of directors could, at any time, elect
to pay distributions quarterly for a variety of reasons,
including to reduce administrative costs. Because our cash
available for distribution in any year may be less than 90.0% of
our taxable income for the year, we may obtain the necessary
funds by borrowing, issuing new securities or selling assets to
pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the distribution
requirement. Our organizational documents do not establish a
limit on the amount of any offering proceeds we may use to fund
distributions.
For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for the
three months ended March 31, 2011, our board of directors
authorized, and we declared and paid, distributions to our
stockholders, based on daily record dates, at a rate that would
equal a 7.25% annualized rate, or $0.725 per common share, based
on a $10.00 per share price. Distributions are aggregated and
paid monthly. Our board of directors also authorized
distributions at that rate for the months of April 2011 and May
2011 to be paid in May 2011 and June 2011, respectively. It is
our intent to continue to pay distributions. However, our board
may reduce our distribution rate and we cannot guarantee the
timing and amount of distributions paid in the future, if any.
If distributions are in excess of our taxable income, such
distributions will result in a return of capital to our
stockholders. Our distributions of amounts in excess of our
taxable income have resulted in a return of capital to our
stockholders.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we paid
distributions to our stockholders of $36,971,000 ($19,320,000 in
cash and $17,651,000 in shares of our common stock pursuant to
the DRIP), as compared to cash flow from operations of
$25,110,000 and funds from operations, or FFO, of $28,836,000
(FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a reconciliation of
FFO to net income (loss), see Funds from Operations and Modified
Funds from Operations). From inception through March 31,
2011, we paid cumulative distributions to our stockholders of
$265,795,000 ($137,261,000 in cash and $128,534,000 in shares of
our common stock pursuant to the DRIP), as compared to
cumulative cash flows from operations of $132,923,000 and
cumulative FFO of $137,226,000. The difference between our
cumulative distributions paid and our cumulative cash flows from
operations is indicative of our high volume of acquisitions
completed since our date of inception. The distributions paid in
excess of our cash flow from operations for the quarter ended
March 31, 2011 were paid using proceeds from debt financing.
Financing
We anticipate that our aggregate borrowings, both secured and
unsecured, will approximate 30%-40% of all of our
properties and other real estate related assets
combined fair market values, as determined at the end of each
calendar year. For these purposes, the fair market value of each
asset will be equal to the purchase price paid for the asset or,
if the asset was appraised subsequent to the date of purchase,
then the fair market value will be equal to the value reported
in the most recent independent appraisal of the asset. Our
policies do not limit the amount we may borrow with respect to
any individual investment. As of March 31, 2011, our
aggregate borrowings were 31.6% of all of our properties
and other real estate related assets combined fair market
values. Of the $112,980,000 maturing in 2011, $58,000,000 was
paid in full on May 3, 2011, $33,200,000 have two one-year
extensions available and $21,780,000 have a one-year extension
available. At present, there are no extension options associated
with our debt that matures in 2012. We anticipate utilizing all
extension options that are available to us.
43
Our charter precludes us, until our shares are listed on a
national securities exchange, from borrowing in excess of 300%
of the value of our net assets, unless approved by a majority of
our independent directors and the justification for such excess
borrowing is disclosed to our stockholders in our next quarterly
report. For purposes of this determination, net assets are our
total assets, other than intangibles, calculated at cost before
deducting depreciation, bad debt and other similar non-cash
reserves, less total liabilities and computed at least quarterly
on a consistently-applied basis. Generally, the preceding
calculation is expected to approximate 75.0% of the sum of the
aggregate cost of our real estate and real estate related assets
before depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar
non-cash reserves. As of March 31, 2011, our leverage did
not exceed 300% of the value of our net assets.
Mortgage
Loans Payable, Net and Secured Real Estate Term Loan
See Note 7, Mortgage Loans Payable, Net and Secured Real
Estate Term Loan, to our accompanying interim condensed
consolidated financial statements, for a further discussion of
our mortgage loans payable, net and secured real estate term
loan, which was obtained during the three months ended
March 31, 2011.
Revolving
Credit Facility
See Note 9, Revolving Credit Facility, and Note 19,
Subsequent Events, to our accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements, for a further discussion of our credit
facility.
REIT
Requirements
In order to remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax
purposes, we are required to make distributions to our
stockholders of at least 90.0% of REIT taxable income. In the
event that there is a shortfall in net cash available due to
factors including, without limitation, the timing of such
distributions or the timing of the collections of receivables,
we may seek to obtain capital to pay distributions by means of
secured debt financing through one or more third parties. We may
also pay distributions from cash from capital transactions
including, without limitation, the sale of one or more of our
properties. See Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, to
our accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements regarding the closing agreement we have requested
from the IRS.
Commitments
and Contingencies
See Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, to our
accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements, for a further discussion of our commitments and
contingencies.
Debt
Service Requirements
One of our principal liquidity needs is the payment of principal
and interest on outstanding indebtedness. As of March 31,
2011, we had fixed and variable rate mortgage loans payable and
our secured real estate term loan outstanding in the principal
amount of $728,101,000, including a premium of $2,958,000. We
are required by the terms of the applicable loan documents to
meet certain financial covenants, such as minimum net worth and
liquidity amount, and reporting requirements. As of
March 31, 2011, we believe that we were in compliance with
all such covenants and requirements on our mortgage loans
payable and term loan.
As discussed further in Note 19, Subsequent Events, to our
accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements, we paid off the $58,000,000 principal balance of one
of our variable rate mortgage loans payable on May 3, 2011.
As of March 31, 2011, the balance on our unsecured
revolving credit facility was zero.
As of March 31, 2011, the weighted average interest rate on
our outstanding debt was 4.78% per annum.
44
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2011, we had no off-balance sheet
transactions, nor do we currently have any such arrangements or
obligations.
Inflation
We are exposed to inflation risk as income from future long-term
leases is the primary source of our cash flows from operations.
There are provisions in the majority of our tenant leases that
protect us from the impact of inflation. These provisions
include rent steps, reimbursement billings for operating expense
pass-through charges, real estate tax and insurance
reimbursements on a per square foot allowance. However, due to
the long-term nature of the leases, among other factors, the
leases may not re-set frequently enough to cover inflation.
Funds
from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations
We define Funds from Operations, or FFO, a non-GAAP measure, as
net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding
gains or losses from sales of property but including asset
impairment write downs, plus depreciation and amortization, and
after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint
ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint
ventures are calculated to reflect FFO. We present FFO because
we consider it an important supplemental measure of our
operating performance and believe it is frequently used by
securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in
the evaluation of REITs, many of which present FFO when
reporting their results. FFO is intended to exclude GAAP
historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and
related assets, which assumes that the value of real estate
diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate
values have risen or fallen with market conditions. Because FFO
excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real estate,
gains and losses from property dispositions and extraordinary
items, it provides a performance measure that, when compared
year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in
occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development
activities and interest costs, providing perspective not
immediately apparent from net income.
We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the
Board of Governors of NAREIT in its March 1995 White Paper (as
amended in November 1999 and April 2002), which may differ from
the methodology for calculating FFO utilized by other equity
REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other
REITs. Further, FFO does not represent amounts available for
managements discretionary use because of needed capital
replacement or expansion, debt service obligations or other
commitments and uncertainties. FFO should not be considered as
an alternative to net income (loss) (computed in accordance with
GAAP) as an indicator of our financial performance or to cash
flow from operating activities (computed in accordance with
GAAP) as an indicator of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of
funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to
pay distributions.
Changes in the accounting and reporting rules under GAAP have
prompted a significant increase in the amount of non-operating
items included in FFO, as defined. Therefore, we use modified
funds from operations, or MFFO, which excludes from FFO
transition charges and acquisition-related expenses, to further
evaluate how our portfolio might perform after our acquisition
stage is complete and the sustainability of our dividend in the
future. MFFO should not be considered as an alternative to net
income (loss) or to cash flows from operating activities and is
not intended to be used as a liquidity measure indicative of
cash flow available to fund our cash needs, including our
ability to make distributions. MFFO should be reviewed in
connection with other GAAP measurements. Management considers
the following items in the calculation of MFFO:
Acquisition-related expenses: Prior to 2009,
acquisition-related expenses were capitalized and have
historically been added back to FFO over time through
depreciation; however, beginning in 2009, acquisition-related
expenses related to business combinations are expensed. These
acquisition-related expenses have been and will continue to be
funded from the proceeds of our debt and our offerings and not
from operations. We believe by excluding expensed
acquisition-related expenses MFFO provides useful supplemental
information that is comparable for our real estate investments.
45
Transition-related charges: FFO includes certain
charges related to the cost of our transition to
self-management. These items include, but are not limited to,
the majority of the one-time redemption and termination payment
made to our former advisor, as further discussed in
Note 12, Related Party Transactions, to our interim
condensed consolidated financial statements, as well as
additional legal expenses, system conversion costs (including
updates to certain estimate development procedures) and
non-recurring employment costs. Because MFFO excludes such
costs, management believes MFFO provides useful supplemental
information by focusing on the changes in our fundamental
operations that will be comparable rather than on such
transition charges. We do not believe such costs will recur now
that our transition to a self-management infrastructure has been
completed.
Our calculation of MFFO may have limitations as an analytical
tool because it reflects the costs unique to our transition to a
self-management model, which may be different from that of other
healthcare REITs. Additionally, MFFO reflects features of our
ownership interests in our medical office buildings and
healthcare-related facilities that are unique to us. Companies
that are considered to be in our industry may not have similar
ownership structures; and therefore those companies may not
calculate MFFO in the same manner that we do, or at all,
limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. We compensate
for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP and FFO
results and using our MFFO as a supplemental measure.
The following is the calculation of FFO and MFFO for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
2,190,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(482,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization consolidated properties
|
|
|
26,750,000
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
17,311,000
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest of limited
partners
|
|
|
(40,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization related to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(64,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO attributable to controlling interest
|
|
$
|
28,836,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,714,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per share basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition-related expenses
|
|
|
1,062,000
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
3,224,000
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Transition-related charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MFFO attributable to controlling interest
|
|
$
|
29,898,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,133,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MFFO per share basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
214,797,450
|
|
|
|
214,797,450
|
|
|
|
145,335,661
|
|
|
|
145,335,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
214,996,502
|
|
|
|
214,996,502
|
|
|
|
145,335,661
|
|
|
|
145,335,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, MFFO per share
was diluted by the increase in net proceeds realized from our
follow-on offering of shares. This primary offering closed on
February 28, 2011. However, for noncustodial accounts,
subscription agreements signed on or before February 28,
2011 with all documents and funds received by the end of
business March 15, 2011 were accepted. For custodial
accounts, subscription agreements signed on or before
February 28, 2011 with all documents and funds received by
the end of business March 31, 2011 were accepted. For the
three months ended March 31, 2011, we sold
21,713,365 shares of our common stock, increasing our
outstanding shares by 10.7% compared to the fourth quarter of
2010.
46
Net
Operating Income
Net operating income is a non-GAAP financial measure that is
defined as net income (loss), computed in accordance with GAAP,
generated from our total portfolio of properties (including both
our operating properties and those classified as held for sale
as of March 31, 2011) before interest expense, general
and administrative expenses, depreciation, amortization,
acquisition-related expenses, and interest and dividend income.
We believe that net operating income provides an accurate
measure of the operating performance of our operating assets
because net operating income excludes certain items that are not
associated with management of the properties. Additionally, we
believe that net operating income is a widely accepted measure
of comparative operating performance in the real estate
community. However, our use of the term net operating income may
not be comparable to that of other real estate companies as they
may have different methodologies for computing this amount.
To facilitate understanding of this financial measure, a
reconciliation of net income (loss) to net operating income has
been provided for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
2,190,000
|
|
|
$
|
(482,000
|
)
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
7,308,000
|
|
|
|
3,605,000
|
|
Acquisition-related expenses
|
|
|
1,062,000
|
|
|
|
3,224,000
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26,750,000
|
|
|
|
17,311,000
|
|
Interest expense and net gain on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
9,842,000
|
|
|
|
7,440,000
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
(118,000
|
)
|
|
|
(16,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
|
|
$
|
47,034,000
|
|
|
$
|
31,082,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent
Events
See Note 19, Subsequent Events, to our accompanying interim
condensed consolidated financial statements, for a further
discussion of our subsequent events.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
There were no material changes in the information regarding
market risk that was provided in our 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as filed with the SEC on March 25, 2011, other than the
updates discussed within this item.
The table below presents, as of March 31, 2011, the
principal amounts and weighted average interest rates by year of
expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and
sensitivity to interest rate changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fixed rate debt principal payments
|
|
$
|
5,797,000
|
|
|
$
|
47,835,000
|
|
|
$
|
26,964,000
|
|
|
$
|
49,928,000
|
|
|
$
|
71,770,000
|
|
|
$
|
273,105,000
|
|
|
$
|
475,399,000
|
|
|
$
|
503,159,000
|
|
Weighted average interest rate on maturing debt (based on rates
in effect as of March 31, 2011) fixed
|
|
|
6.01
|
%
|
|
|
6.38
|
%
|
|
|
5.81
|
%
|
|
|
6.43
|
%
|
|
|
5.39
|
%
|
|
|
6.07
|
%
|
|
|
6.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate debt principal payments
|
|
$
|
113,414,000
|
|
|
$
|
913,000
|
|
|
$
|
126,427,000
|
|
|
$
|
193,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,797,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
249,744,000
|
|
|
$
|
249,217,000
|
|
Weighted average interest rate on maturing debt (based on rates
in effect as of March 31, 2011) variable
|
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
|
|
2.59
|
%
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
47
Mortgage loans and secured term loan payable were $725,143,000
($728,101,000, including premium) as of March 31, 2011. As
of March 31, 2011, we had fixed and variable rate mortgage
loans and our secured real estate term loan with effective
interest rates ranging from 1.74% to 12.75% per annum and a
weighted average effective interest rate of 4.78% per annum. We
had $475,399,000 ($478,357,000, including premium) of fixed rate
debt, or 65.6% of mortgage loans and secured term loan payable,
at a weighted average interest rate of 6.02% per annum and
$249,744,000 of variable rate debt, or 34.4% of mortgage loans
and secured term loan payable, at a weighted average interest
rate of 2.42% per annum as of March 31, 2011.
In addition to changes in interest rates, the value of our
future properties is subject to fluctuations based on changes in
local and regional economic conditions and changes in the
creditworthiness of tenants, which may affect our ability to
refinance our debt if necessary.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in our reports under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and
forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, who serves as our principal financial
officer and principal accounting officer, as appropriate, to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In
designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures,
we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how
well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable
assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours
are designed to do, and we necessarily were required to apply
our judgment in evaluating whether the benefits of the controls
and procedures that we adopt outweigh their costs.
As of March 31, 2011, an evaluation was conducted under the
supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31,
2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
48
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
From time to time, we may be involved in various claims and
legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. As of
March 31, 2011, we were not involved in any such legal
proceedings.
There are no other material changes from the risk factors
previously disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as filed with the SEC on March 25, 2011, except as noted
below.
Some or all of the following factors may affect the returns we
receive from our investments, our results of operations, our
ability to pay distributions to our stockholders, availability
to make additional investments or our ability to dispose of our
investments.
We may
not have sufficient cash available from operations to pay
distributions, and, therefore, distributions may be paid,
without limitation, with borrowed funds.
The amount of the distributions we make to our stockholders will
be determined by our board of directors, at its sole discretion,
and is dependent on a number of factors, including funds
available for payment of distributions, our financial condition,
and capital expenditure requirements and annual distribution
requirements needed to maintain our status as a REIT, as well as
any liquidity event alternatives we may pursue. On
February 14, 2007, our board of directors approved a 7.25%
per annum, or $0.725 per common share based on a
$10.00 share price, distribution to be paid to our
stockholders beginning with our February 2007 monthly
distribution, and we have continued to declare distributions at
that rate through May 2011. However, our board may reduce our
distribution rate and we cannot guarantee the amount and timing
of distributions paid in the future, if any.
If our cash flow from operations is less than the distributions
our board of directors determines to pay, we would be required
to pay our distributions, or a portion thereof, with borrowed
funds. As a result, the amount of proceeds available for
investment and operations would be reduced, or we may incur
additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds.
In the past we have paid a portion of our distributions using
offering proceeds or borrowed funds, and we may continue to use
borrowed funds in the future to pay distributions. For the three
months ended March 31, 2011, we paid distributions to our
stockholders of $36,971,000 ($19,320,000 in cash and $17,651,000
in shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP), as compared
to cash flow from operations of $25,110,000. The remaining
$11,861,000 of distributions paid in excess of our cash flow
from operations, or 32%, was paid using the proceeds of our debt
financing. In addition, the DRIP may be terminated at any time
by our board of directors and may be amended at any time by our
board of directors, at its sole discretion, upon
10 days notice.
Stockholders
may be unable to sell their shares because their ability to have
shares repurchased pursuant to our amended and restated share
repurchase plan has been limited.
Even though our share repurchase plan may provide stockholders
with a limited opportunity to sell shares to us after they have
held them for a period of one year or in the event of death or
qualifying disability, stockholders should be fully aware that
our share repurchase plan contains significant restrictions and
limitations. Repurchases of shares, when requested, will
generally be made quarterly. Our board may limit, suspend,
terminate or amend any provision of the share repurchase plan
upon 30 days notice. Repurchases will be limited to
5.0% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during
the prior calendar year, subject to available funding from the
DRIP. On November 24, 2010, we, with the approval of our
board of directors, elected to amend and restate our share
repurchase plan. Pursuant to the amended and restated share
repurchase plan, starting in the first calendar quarter of 2011,
we will fund a maximum of $10 million of share repurchase
requests per quarter, subject to available
49
funding. Funding for quarterly repurchases of shares will come
exclusively from and will be limited to the net proceeds from
the sale of shares under the DRIP in the applicable quarter. In
addition, stockholders must present at least 25.0% of their
shares for repurchase and until they have held shares for at
least four years, repurchases will be made for less than
stockholders paid for their shares. Therefore, stockholders
should not assume that they will be able to sell any of their
shares back to us pursuant to our amended and restated share
repurchase plan at any particular time or at all.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
Use of
Public Offering Proceeds
On September 20, 2006, we commenced a best efforts public
offering pursuant to our Registration Statement on
Form S-11 (File No. 333-133652, effective
September 20, 2006), or our initial offering, in which we
offered up to 200,000,000 shares of our common stock for
$10.00 per share and up to 21,052,632 shares of our common
stock pursuant to our DRIP, at $9.50 per share, aggregating up
to $2,200,000,000. The initial offering expired on
March 19, 2010. As of March 19, 2010, we had received
and accepted subscriptions in our initial offering for
147,562,354 shares of our common stock, or $1,474,062,000,
excluding shares of our common stock issued under the DRIP.
On March 19, 2010, we commenced a best efforts public
offering pursuant to our Registration Statement on
Form S-11 (File No. 333-158418, effective
March 19, 2010), or our follow-on offering, in which we
offered up to 200,000,000 shares of our common stock for
$10.00 per share in our primary offering and up to
21,052,632 shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP
at $9.50 per share, aggregating up to $2,200,000,000. We stopped
offering shares in our primary offering on February 28,
2011. For noncustodial accounts, subscription agreements signed
on or before February 28, 2011 with all documents and funds
received by the end of business March 15, 2011 were
accepted. For custodial accounts, subscription agreements signed
on or before February 28, 2011 with all documents and funds
received by the end of business March 31, 2011 were
accepted. As of March 31, 2011, we had received and
accepted subscriptions in our follow-on offering for
72,219,583 shares of our common stock, or $721,183,000,
excluding shares of our common stock issued under the DRIP. We
continue to offer shares pursuant to our DRIP; however, we may
terminate our DRIP at any time.
As of March 31, 2011, we have incurred for our initial
offering and our follow-on offering an aggregate of $39,522,000
in dealer manager fees, $145,813,000 in selling commissions and
$2,454,000 in due diligence expense reimbursements. We have also
incurred organizational and offering expenses of $26,956,000
related to our initial and follow-on offerings. Net offering
proceeds for our initial and follow-on offerings based on
subscriptions received and accepted as of March 31, 2011,
after deducting these expenses, totaled $1,980,500,000.
As of March 31, 2011, we have used substantially all of
these net offering proceeds to make our 78 geographically
diverse portfolio acquisitions, repay debt incurred in
connection with such acquisitions and pay acquisition costs. We
also used a portion of these proceeds during our initial
offering to pay distributions.
Purchases
of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated
Purchasers
Our share repurchase plan allows for share repurchases by us
when certain criteria are met by our stockholders. Share
repurchases will be made at the sole discretion of our board of
directors.
50
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we
repurchased shares of our common stock as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares
|
|
Dollar Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of
|
|
of Shares that May
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly
|
|
Yet be Purchased
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
Average Price
|
|
Announced
|
|
Under the
|
Period
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
Plan or Program(1)
|
|
Plans or Programs(2)
|
|
January 1, 2011 to January 31, 2011
|
|
|
819,103
|
|
|
$
|
9.63
|
|
|
|
819,103
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
February 1, 2011 to February 28, 2011
|
|
|
2,004
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
|
|
2,004
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
March 1, 2011 to March 31, 2011
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
$
|
9.44
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our board of directors adopted a share repurchase plan effective
September 20, 2006. Our board of directors adopted, and we
publicly announced, an amended share repurchase plan effective
August 25, 2008. On November 24, 2010, we amended and
restated our share repurchase plan again effective
January 1, 2011. From inception through March 31,
2011, we had repurchased 8,109,867 shares of our common
stock pursuant to our share repurchase plan. Our share
repurchase plan does not have an expiration date but may be
suspended or terminated at our board of directors
discretion. |
|
(2) |
|
Repurchases under our share repurchase plan are subject to the
discretion of our board of directors. The plan provides that
repurchases are subject to funds being available and are limited
in any calendar year to 5.0% of the weighted average number of
shares of our common stock outstanding during the prior calendar
year. The plan also provides that we will fund a maximum of
$10 million of share repurchase requests per quarter,
subject to available funding, and that funding for repurchases
will come exclusively from and will be limited to proceeds we
receive from the sale of shares under our DRIP during such
quarter. |
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities.
|
None.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index (following the
signatures section of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q)
are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q.
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare Trust of America, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2011
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Scott D. Peters
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Scott D. Peters
Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chairman (Principal
executive officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16, 2011
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Kellie S. Pruitt
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Kellie S. Pruitt
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal financial officer and
Principal accounting officer)
|
52
EXHIBIT INDEX
Following the consummation of the merger of NNN Realty Advisors,
Inc., which previously served as our sponsor, with and into a
wholly owned subsidiary of Grubb & Ellis Company on
December 7, 2007, NNN Healthcare/Office REIT, Inc., NNN
Healthcare/Office REIT Holdings, L.P., NNN Healthcare/Office
REIT Advisor, LLC and NNN Healthcare/Office Management, LLC
changed their names to Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT,
Inc., Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT Holdings, L.P.,
Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT Advisor, LLC, and
Grubb & Ellis Healthcare Management, LLC, respectively.
Following the Registrants transition to self-management,
on August 24, 2009, Grubb & Ellis Healthcare
REIT, Inc. and Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT Holdings,
L.P. changed their names to Healthcare Trust of America, Inc.
and Healthcare Trust of America Holdings, LP, respectively.
The following Exhibit List refers to the entity names used
prior to such name changes in order to accurately reflect the
names of the parties on the documents listed.
Pursuant to Item 601(a)(2) of
Regulation S-K,
this Exhibit Index immediately precedes the exhibits.
The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by
reference, in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2011 (and are numbered in
accordance with Item 601 of
Regulation S-K).
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Fourth Articles of Amendment and Restatement (included as
Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed December 22, 2010 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Bylaws of NNN Healthcare/Office REIT, Inc. (included as
Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-11
(Commission File.
No. 333-133652)
filed on April 28, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Amendment to the Bylaws of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare
REIT, Inc., effective April 21, 2009 (included as
Exhibit 3.4 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to the
Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-11
(File
No. 333-133652)
filed on April 21, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Amendment to the Bylaws of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare
REIT, Inc., effective January 1, 2011 (included as
Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed August 27, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006
Incentive Plan, dated February 24, 2011 (included as
Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed March 2, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
Amendment to the Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. 2006
Independent Directors Compensation Plan, as amended.
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Accounting Officer, pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1**
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.2**
|
|
Certification of Chief Accounting Officer, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith. |