e10vq
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2008
Commission
file number 0-7818
INDEPENDENT BANK CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
38-2032782 |
|
|
|
(State or jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification |
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Number) |
230 West Main Street, P.O. Box 491, Ionia, Michigan 48846
(Address of principal executive offices)
(616) 527-9450
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
NONE
Former name, address and fiscal year, if changed since last report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all documents and reports required
to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $1
|
|
22,767,480 |
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at May 7, 2008 |
INDEPENDENT BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
Any statements in this document that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements as
defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as expect, believe,
intend, estimate, project, may and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are predicated on managements beliefs
and assumptions based on information known to Independent Bank Corporations management as of the
date of this document and do not purport to speak as of any other date. Forward-looking statements
may include descriptions of plans and objectives of Independent Bank Corporations management for
future or past operations, products or services, and forecasts of the Companys revenue, earnings
or other measures of economic performance, including statements of profitability, business segments
and subsidiaries, and estimates of credit quality trends. Such statements reflect the view of
Independent Bank Corporations management as of this date with respect to future events and are not
guarantees of future performance; involve assumptions and are subject to substantial risks and
uncertainties, such as the changes in Independent Bank Corporations plans, objectives,
expectations and intentions. Should one or more of these risks materialize or should underlying
beliefs or assumptions prove incorrect, the Companys actual results could differ materially from
those discussed. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences are changes in interest
rates, changes in the accounting treatment of any particular item, the results of regulatory
examinations, changes in industries where the Company has a concentration of loans, changes in the
level of fee income, changes in general economic conditions and related credit and market
conditions, and the impact of regulatory responses to any of the foregoing. Forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date they are made. Independent Bank Corporation does not undertake
to update forward-looking statements to reflect facts, circumstances, assumptions or events that
occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made. For any forward-looking statements
made in this document, Independent Bank Corporation claims the protection of the safe harbor for
forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Part I
Item 1.
INDEPENDENT
BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
58,210 |
|
|
$ |
79,289 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
12,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
345,478 |
|
|
|
364,194 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock, at cost |
|
|
26,352 |
|
|
|
21,839 |
|
Loans held for sale, carried at fair value, at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
33,056 |
|
|
|
33,960 |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
1,060,290 |
|
|
|
1,066,276 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
866,229 |
|
|
|
873,945 |
|
Installment |
|
|
363,743 |
|
|
|
368,478 |
|
Finance receivables |
|
|
248,085 |
|
|
|
238,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
2,538,347 |
|
|
|
2,546,896 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(49,911 |
) |
|
|
(45,294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans |
|
|
2,488,436 |
|
|
|
2,501,602 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
73,343 |
|
|
|
73,558 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
43,413 |
|
|
|
42,934 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
66,754 |
|
|
|
66,754 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
14,469 |
|
|
|
15,262 |
|
Capitalized mortgage loan servicing rights |
|
|
15,297 |
|
|
|
15,780 |
|
Accrued income and other assets |
|
|
69,748 |
|
|
|
60,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
3,247,411 |
|
|
$ |
3,276,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
291,000 |
|
|
$ |
294,332 |
|
Savings and NOW |
|
|
1,005,040 |
|
|
|
987,299 |
|
Retail time |
|
|
708,156 |
|
|
|
707,419 |
|
Brokered time |
|
|
247,603 |
|
|
|
516,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
2,251,799 |
|
|
|
2,505,127 |
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
45,831 |
|
|
|
54,452 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
543,180 |
|
|
|
302,539 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
92,888 |
|
|
|
92,888 |
|
Financed premiums payable |
|
|
42,145 |
|
|
|
44,911 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
33,028 |
|
|
|
35,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
3,008,871 |
|
|
|
3,035,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value200,000 shares authorized; none
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1.00 par value40,000,000 shares authorized;
issued and outstanding: 23,015,040 shares at March 31, 2008
and 22,647,511 shares at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
22,765 |
|
|
|
22,601 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
196,675 |
|
|
|
195,302 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
19,062 |
|
|
|
22,770 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
238,540 |
|
|
|
240,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
3,247,411 |
|
|
$ |
3,276,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to interim consolidated financial statements
2
INDEPENDENT
BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
48,126 |
|
|
$ |
49,953 |
|
Interest on securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
2,477 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Income |
|
|
53,034 |
|
|
|
55,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
16,212 |
|
|
|
22,408 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
6,437 |
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Expense |
|
|
22,649 |
|
|
|
25,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income |
|
|
30,385 |
|
|
|
29,632 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
11,316 |
|
|
|
8,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses |
|
|
19,069 |
|
|
|
21,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
5,647 |
|
|
|
4,888 |
|
Net gains (losses) on assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans |
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
Securities |
|
|
(2,163 |
) |
|
|
79 |
|
VISA check card interchange income |
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
Mortgage loan servicing |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
527 |
|
Title insurance fees |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
Other income |
|
|
2,676 |
|
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-interest Income |
|
|
9,492 |
|
|
|
10,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits |
|
|
14,184 |
|
|
|
13,968 |
|
Occupancy, net |
|
|
3,114 |
|
|
|
2,614 |
|
Loan and collection |
|
|
1,925 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
Advertising |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
Branch acquisition and conversion costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
343 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
6,386 |
|
|
|
5,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-interest Expense |
|
|
30,251 |
|
|
|
27,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Tax |
|
|
(1,690 |
) |
|
|
4,197 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(2,031 |
) |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income From Continuing Operations |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
3,892 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
4,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Per Share From Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.02 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
Net Income Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.02 |
|
|
|
.19 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
.18 |
|
Dividends Per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Declared |
|
$ |
.11 |
|
|
|
.21 |
|
Paid |
|
|
.21 |
|
|
|
.20 |
|
See notes to interim consolidated financial statements
3
INDEPENDENT BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
4,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale |
|
|
85,916 |
|
|
|
70,293 |
|
Disbursements for loans held for sale |
|
|
(83,145 |
) |
|
|
(71,325 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
11,316 |
|
|
|
8,288 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of premiums and accretion of
discounts on securities and loans |
|
|
(4,524 |
) |
|
|
(2,584 |
) |
Net gains on mortgage loans |
|
|
(1,867 |
) |
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
Net (gains) losses on securities |
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
343 |
|
Deferred loan fees |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
Share based compensation |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accrued income and other assets |
|
|
(8,179 |
) |
|
|
813 |
|
Decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(614 |
) |
|
|
(4,776 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash from Operating Activities |
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
4,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale |
|
|
7,913 |
|
|
|
6,367 |
|
Proceeds from the maturity of securities available for sale |
|
|
5,747 |
|
|
|
8,790 |
|
Principal payments received on securities available for sale |
|
|
5,567 |
|
|
|
8,094 |
|
Purchases of securities available for sale |
|
|
(15,403 |
) |
|
|
(19,000 |
) |
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
(4,513 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in portfolio loans originated, net of principal payments |
|
|
9,567 |
|
|
|
4,135 |
|
Acquisition of business offices, less cash paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,053 |
|
Proceeds from sale of insurance premium finance business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,901 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(1,917 |
) |
|
|
(2,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash from Investing Activities |
|
|
6,961 |
|
|
|
391,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow (used in) Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in total deposits |
|
|
(254,000 |
) |
|
|
(107,505 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in other borrowings and federal funds purchased |
|
|
141,274 |
|
|
|
(169,823 |
) |
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
243,000 |
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
Payments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(151,754 |
) |
|
|
(49,003 |
) |
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
Net decrease in financed premiums payable |
|
|
(2,766 |
) |
|
|
(1,854 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(4,770 |
) |
|
|
(4,584 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,989 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash (used in) Financing Activities |
|
|
(29,465 |
) |
|
|
(307,190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(21,079 |
) |
|
|
88,561 |
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
167 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
79,289 |
|
|
|
73,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
58,210 |
|
|
$ |
161,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
25,763 |
|
|
$ |
28,502 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Transfer of loans to other real estate |
|
|
6,947 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
Adoption of
fair value option securities transferred from available for sale to trading |
|
|
15,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to interim consolidated financial statements
4
INDEPENDENT BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
240,502 |
|
|
$ |
258,167 |
|
Net income |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
4,243 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
(2,531 |
) |
|
|
(4,739 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
Share based compensation |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,989 |
) |
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of
reclassification adjustment pursuant to the adoption of SFAS #159
and related tax effect |
|
|
(1,309 |
) |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
238,540 |
|
|
$ |
251,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to interim consolidated financial statements.
5
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all the
adjustments necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial condition as of March 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007, and the results of operations for the three-month periods ended March 31,
2008 and 2007. Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior year financial statements to
conform to the current year presentation. Our critical accounting policies include the assessment
for other than temporary impairment on investment securities, the determination of the allowance
for loan losses, the valuation of derivative financial instruments, the valuation of originated
mortgage loan servicing rights, the valuation of deferred tax assets and the valuation of goodwill.
Refer to our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a disclosure of our accounting policies.
2. In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements", (SFAS #157). This
statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement establishes a fair value hierarchy about
the assumptions used to measure fair value and clarifies assumptions about risk and the effect of a
restriction on the sale or use of an asset. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP) 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157". This FSP delays the effective date of SFAS #157 for
all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this statement
on January 1, 2008 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, (SFAS #159). This statement provides companies with an option to report
selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value and establishes presentation and disclosure
requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement
attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. This new standard is effective for us on
January 1, 2008. We elected the fair value option for certain securities available for sale that
existed at January 1, 2008 and for loans held for sale originated on or after January 1, 2008. The
cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings resulting from the adoption of SFAS #159 was an
after tax decrease of $1.5 million. This amount was reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income.
In November, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
109, Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value through Earnings (SAB 109). Previously,
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments (SAB
105) stated that in measuring the fair value of a derivative loan commitment, a company should not
incorporate the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan. SAB
109 supersedes SAB 105 and indicates that the expected net future cash flows related to the
associated servicing of the loan should be included in measuring fair value for all written loan
commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. SAB 105 also indicated that
internally-developed intangible assets should not be recorded as part of the fair value of a
derivative loan commitment, and SAB 109 retains that view. SAB 109 was effective for derivative
loan commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007. As a
result of adoption of SAB 109, gains on mortgage loans increased by $0.4 million, before tax during
the first three months of 2008.
6
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
3. Our assessment of the allowance for loan losses is based on an evaluation of the loan
portfolio, recent loss experience, current economic conditions and other pertinent factors. Loans
on non-accrual status, past due more than 90 days, or restructured amounted to $102.2 million at
March 31, 2008, and $77.2 million at December 31, 2007.
Impaired loans totaled approximately $84.9 million, $61.3 million and $29.8 million at March 31,
2008, December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2007, respectively. At those same dates, certain impaired
loans with balances of approximately $69.6 million, $53.4 million and $20.6 million, respectively
had specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses, which totaled approximately $16.2
million, $10.7 million and $4.9 million, respectively. Our average investment in impaired loans
was approximately $73.1 million and $26.5 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. Cash receipts on impaired loans on non-accrual status are generally
applied to the principal balance. Interest income recognized on impaired loans during the first
quarters of 2008 and 2007 was approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of which
the majority of these amounts were recorded in cash.
An analysis of the allowance for loan losses is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Commitments |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Commitments |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
45,294 |
|
|
$ |
1,936 |
|
|
$ |
26,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,881 |
|
Additions (deduction) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision charged to operating expense |
|
|
11,383 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
7,989 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Recoveries credited to allowance |
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged against the allowance |
|
|
(7,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
49,911 |
|
|
$ |
1,869 |
|
|
$ |
30,908 |
|
|
$ |
2,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Comprehensive income for the three-month periods ended March 31 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
4,243 |
|
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on
securities
available for sale, net of related tax effect |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on derivative
instruments, net of related tax effect |
|
|
(1,481 |
) |
|
|
(523 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for accretion on
settled derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
(968 |
) |
|
$ |
4,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
The net change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale reflect net gains and
losses reclassified into earnings as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Gain reclassified into earnings
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
Federal income tax expense as a
result of the reclassification of these
amounts from comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
5. Our reportable segments are based upon legal entities. We currently have two reportable
segments: Independent Bank (IB) and Mepco Finance Corporation (Mepco). We evaluate
performance based principally on net income of the respective reportable segments. In September
2007 we consolidated our four existing bank charters into one. Prior to this consolidation we
reported each of the four banks as separate segments. Prior period information for the four banks
has been consolidated under our current IB segment.
A summary of selected financial information for our reportable segments as of or for the
three-month periods ended March 31, follows:
As of or for the three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IB |
|
Mepco |
|
Other(1) |
|
Elimination |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,961,661 |
|
|
$ |
277,146 |
|
|
$ |
337,565 |
|
|
$ |
(328,961 |
) |
|
$ |
3,247,411 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
45,860 |
|
|
|
7,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,034 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
26,739 |
|
|
|
5,515 |
|
|
|
(1,869 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,385 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
11,242 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,316 |
|
Income (loss) before income tax |
|
|
(3,031 |
) |
|
|
3,821 |
|
|
|
(2,456 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(1,690 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
(1,520 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
341 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,153,381 |
|
|
$ |
214,776 |
|
|
$ |
336,946 |
|
|
$ |
(349,532 |
) |
|
$ |
3,355,571 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
50,302 |
|
|
|
5,198 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
55,344 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
27,969 |
|
|
|
3,268 |
|
|
|
(1,563 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
29,632 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
8,010 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,139 |
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations
before income tax |
|
|
4,976 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
(2,337 |
) |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
4,197 |
|
Discontinued operations,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
4,330 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
(1,393 |
) |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
4,243 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes amounts relating to our parent company and certain insignificant
operations. |
6. Basic income per share is based on weighted average common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted income per share includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common
shares to be issued upon the exercise of stock options, stock units for a deferred compensation
plan for non-employee directors and restricted stock awards.
8
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
A reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three-month periods ended March 31
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
3,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
4,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding |
|
|
22,639 |
|
|
|
22,829 |
|
Effect of stock options |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
Stock units for deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding for calculation of diluted earnings per share |
|
|
22,768 |
|
|
|
23,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.02 |
|
|
$ |
.17 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
Net income per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.02 |
|
|
$ |
.19 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
.18 |
|
Weighted average stock options outstanding that were anti-dilutive totaled 1.4 million and 0.7
million for the three-months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
7. SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, (SFAS #133)
which was subsequently amended by SFAS #138, requires companies to record derivatives on the
balance sheet as assets and liabilities measured at their fair value. The accounting for increases
and decreases in the value of derivatives depends upon the use of derivatives and whether the
derivatives qualify for hedge accounting.
Our derivative financial instruments according to the type of hedge in which they are designated
under SFAS #133 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Notional |
|
Maturity |
|
Fair |
|
|
Amount |
|
(years) |
|
Value |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Fair Value Hedges pay variable interest-rate swap agreements |
|
$ |
106,159 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed interest-rate swap agreements |
|
$ |
139,500 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
(2,543 |
) |
Interest-rate cap agreements |
|
|
178,500 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
318,000 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
(2,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No hedge designation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed interest-rate swap agreements |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
Pay variable interest-rate swap agreements |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Interest-rate cap agreements |
|
|
112,000 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Rate-lock mortgage loan commitments |
|
|
25,961 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
Mandatory commitments to sell mortgage loans |
|
|
57,581 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
205,542 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
|
|
9
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
We have established management objectives and strategies that include interest-rate risk parameters
for maximum fluctuations in net interest income and market value of portfolio equity. We monitor
our interest rate risk position via simulation modeling reports. The goal of our asset/liability
management efforts is to maintain profitable financial leverage within established risk parameters.
We use variable-rate and short-term fixed-rate (less than 12 months) debt obligations to fund a
portion of our balance sheet, which exposes us to variability in interest rates. To meet our
objectives, we may periodically enter into derivative financial instruments to mitigate exposure to
fluctuations in cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates (Cash Flow Hedges). Cash Flow
Hedges currently include certain pay-fixed interest-rate swaps and interest-rate cap agreements.
Through certain special purposes entities we issue trust preferred securities as part of our
capital management strategy. Certain of these trust preferred securities are variable rate which
exposes us to variability in cash flows . To mitigate our exposure to fluctuations in cash flows
resulting from changes in interest rates, on approximately $20.0 million of variable rate trust
preferred securities, we entered into a pay-fixed interest-rate swap agreement in September,
2007.
Pay-fixed interest-rate swaps convert the variable-rate cash flows on debt obligations to
fixed-rates. Under interest-rate cap agreements, we will receive cash if interest rates rise above
a predetermined level. As a result, we effectively have variable-rate debt with an established
maximum rate. We pay an upfront premium on interest rate caps which is recognized in earnings in
the same period in which the hedged item affects earnings. Unrecognized premiums from interest
rate caps aggregated to $1.0 million and $1.2 million at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively.
We record the fair value of Cash Flow Hedges in accrued income and other assets and accrued
expenses and other liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we adjust our balance sheet to reflect the
then current fair value of Cash Flow Hedges. The related gains or losses are reported in other
comprehensive income and are subsequently reclassified into earnings, as a yield adjustment in the
same period in which the related interest on the hedged items (primarily variable-rate debt
obligations) affect earnings. It is anticipated that approximately $1.0 million, net of tax, of
unrealized losses on Cash Flow Hedges at March 31, 2008 will be reclassified to earnings over the
next twelve months. To the extent that the Cash Flow Hedges are not effective, the ineffective
portion of the Cash Flow Hedges are immediately recognized as interest expense. The maximum term
of any Cash Flow Hedge at March 31, 2008 is 6.8 years.
We also use long-term, fixed-rate brokered CDs to fund a portion of our balance sheet. These
instruments expose us to variability in fair value due to changes in interest rates. To meet our
objectives, we may enter into derivative financial instruments to mitigate exposure to fluctuations
in fair values of such fixed-rate debt instruments (Fair Value Hedges). Fair Value Hedges
currently include pay-variable interest-rate swaps.
Also, we record Fair Value Hedges at fair value in accrued income and other assets and accrued
expenses and other liabilities. The hedged items (primarily fixed-rate debt obligations) are also
recorded at fair value through the statement of operations, which offsets the adjustment to Fair
Value Hedges. On an ongoing basis, we will adjust our balance sheet to reflect the then current
fair value of both the Fair Value Hedges and the respective hedged items. To the extent that the
change in value of the Fair Value Hedges do not offset the change in the value of the hedged items,
the ineffective portion is immediately recognized as interest expense.
10
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
Certain financial derivative instruments are not designated as hedges. The fair value of these
derivative financial instruments have been recorded on our balance sheet and are adjusted on an
ongoing basis to reflect their then current fair value. The changes in the fair value of
derivative financial instruments not designated as hedges, are recognized currently in earnings.
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into rate-lock mortgage loan commitments with
customers (Rate Lock Commitments). These commitments expose us to interest rate risk. We also
enter into mandatory commitments to sell mortgage loans (Mandatory Commitments) to reduce the
impact of price fluctuations of mortgage loans held for sale and Rate Lock Commitments. Mandatory
Commitments help protect our loan sale profit margin from fluctuations in interest rates. The
changes in the fair value of Rate Lock Commitments and Mandatory Commitments are recognized
currently as part of gains on the sale of mortgage loans. We obtain market prices on Mandatory
Commitments and Rate Lock Commitments. Net gains on the sale of mortgage loans, as well as net
income may be more volatile as a result of these derivative instruments, which are not designated
as hedges.
11
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
The impact of SFAS #133 on net income and other comprehensive income for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Change in fair value during the three-
month period ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-rate cap agreements
not designated as hedges |
|
$ |
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(94 |
) |
Rate Lock Commitments |
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387 |
|
Mandatory Commitments |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Ineffectiveness of Fair value hedges |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Ineffectiveness of Cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,185 |
) |
|
|
(2,185 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
(2,279 |
) |
|
|
(1,942 |
) |
Income tax |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
(680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
(1,481 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Change in fair value during the three-
month period ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-rate swap agreements
not designated as hedges |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
Interest-rate cap agreements
not designated as hedges |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Rate Lock Commitments |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
Mandatory Commitments |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
Ineffectiveness of Fair value hedges |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Ineffectiveness of Cash flow hedges |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,425 |
) |
|
|
(1,425 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(959 |
) |
|
|
(997 |
) |
Income tax |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
(624 |
) |
|
$ |
(649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
8. SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, (SFAS #141) and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, (SFAS #142) effects how organizations account for business combinations and
for the goodwill and intangible assets that arise from those combinations or are acquired
otherwise.
Intangible assets, net of amortization, were comprised of the following at March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Amortized intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit |
|
$ |
31,326 |
|
|
$ |
17,348 |
|
|
$ |
31,326 |
|
|
$ |
16,648 |
|
Customer relationship |
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
Covenants not to compete |
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
34,148 |
|
|
$ |
19,679 |
|
|
$ |
34,148 |
|
|
$ |
18,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
intangible assets Goodwill |
|
$ |
66,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
66,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles has been estimated through 2013 and thereafter in the following table,
and does not take into consideration any potential future acquisitions or branch purchases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Nine months ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
2,279 |
|
Year ending December 31: |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
1,838 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,310 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,398 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,115 |
|
2013 and thereafter |
|
|
6,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
13
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and core deposit intangible by reporting segment for the
periods presented were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IB |
|
|
Mepco |
|
|
Other(1) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
49,676 |
|
|
$ |
16,735 |
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
66,754 |
|
Acquired during period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment during period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
49,676 |
|
|
$ |
16,735 |
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
66,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
31,631 |
|
|
$ |
16,735 |
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
48,709 |
|
Acquired during period (2) |
|
|
18,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,369 |
|
Impairment |
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
49,657 |
|
|
$ |
16,735 |
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
66,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes items relating to the Registrant and certain insignificant operations.
|
|
(2) |
|
Goodwill associated with the acquisition of 10 branches. |
During the first quarter of 2007 we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $0.3 million at First
Home Financial (FHF) which was acquired in 1998. We test goodwill for impairment and based on the
fair value of FHF the goodwill associated with FHF was reduced to zero at March 31, 2007. This
amount is included in Goodwill Impairment in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. FHF was a
loan origination company based in Grand Rapids, Michigan that specialized in the financing of
manufactured homes located in mobile home parks or communities and was a subsidiary of our IB
segment above. Revenues and profits had declined at FHF over the last few years and a result of
these declines, the operations of FHF ceased effective June 15, 2007 and this entity was dissolved
on June 30, 2007.
9. We maintain performance-based compensation plans that include a long-term incentive plan that
permits the issuance of share based compensation, including stock options and non-vested share
awards. This plan, which is shareholder approved, permits the grant of share based awards for up
to 0.1 million shares of common stock. We believe that such awards better align the interests of
our officers with our shareholders. Share based compensation awards, are measured at fair value
at the date of grant and are expensed over the requisite service period. Common shares issued upon
exercise of stock options come from currently authorized but unissued shares.
Pursuant to our performance-based compensation plans we granted 0.2 million shares of non-vested
common stock to our officers on January, 16, 2008. The non-vested common stock cliff vests in five
years. We use the market value of the common stock on date of grant to measure compensation cost
for these non-vested share awards. We also estimate expected forfeitures over the vesting period.
No share based awards were granted during the first quarter of 2007. All share based awards
outstanding at December 31, 2005 were fully vested and there were no new or modified share based
awards granted during 2006.
During the first quarter of 2008 we modified 0.1 million stock options originally issued in prior
years for one former officer. These modified options vested immediately and the expense associated
with this modification of $0.01 million was included in compensation and benefits expense for the
three month period ended March 31, 2008. The modification consisted of
14
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
extending the date of exercise subsequent to resignation of the officer from 3 months to 12 months.
A summary of outstanding stock option grants and transactions at March 31, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-months Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Value (in |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(years) |
|
|
thousands) |
|
Outstanding at January 1, |
|
|
1,658,861 |
|
|
$ |
19.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
8,228 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
10,585 |
|
|
|
21.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, |
|
|
1,640,048 |
|
|
$ |
19.57 |
|
|
|
5.17 |
|
|
$ |
471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,603,109 |
|
|
$ |
19.64 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
|
$ |
471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,417,984 |
|
|
$ |
20.06 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of non-vested restricted stock and transactions for the three month periods ended March
31, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Outstanding at January 1, |
|
|
50,596 |
|
|
$ |
16.69 |
|
Granted |
|
|
220,023 |
|
|
|
7.63 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(6,279 |
) |
|
|
9.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, |
|
|
264,340 |
|
|
$ |
9.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation cost recognized during the first three months of 2008 and 2007 for stock option
and restricted stock grants was $0.1 million and zero, respectively. The corresponding tax benefit
relating to this expense was $0.05 million for the first three months of 2008.
At March 31, 2008, the total expected compensation cost related to non vested stock option and
restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $2.1 million. The weighted-average period over
which this amount will be recognized is 3.5 years.
15
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
The following summarizes certain information regarding options exercised during the three-month
periods ending March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Intrinsic value |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash proceeds received |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit realized |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 we had approximately $1.3 million and $2.6 million,
respectively, of gross unrecognized tax benefits. If recognized, $1.0 million would affect our
effective tax rate at March 31, 2008. The decrease in our gross unrecognized tax benefit during
the first quarter of 2008 is the result of a favorable development on a tax position prevalent in
our industry that we had previously reserved for. We do not expect the total amount of
unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase or decrease during the balance of 2008.
11. As discussed in Note 2, we adopted SFAS #157 and #159 on January 1, 2008. We elected to adopt
the fair value option for certain securities available for sale that existed at January 1, 2008
(these securities are now classified as trading securities). We also elected the fair value option
for loans held for sale that were originated on or after January 1, 2008. These elections were made
for the following reasons: (1) trading securities these securities are preferred stocks with no
stated maturity. As such, other than temporary impairment analysis is subjective. By electing the
fair value option, this subjectivity is eliminated. (2) Loans held for sale recording these loans
at fair value will better match the fair value accounting we have historically used on the
mandatory commitments to sell these loans we enter into to reduce the impact of price fluctuations
of the loans held for sale.
The following table summarizes the impact of adopting the fair value option for the available for
sale securities on January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS #159 for loans held for sale had no
impact on equity as this election was made for such loans that were originated on or after January
1, 2008. Amounts shown represent the cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings resulting
from the adoption of SFAS #159. These amounts were reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Securities available for sale amortized cost |
|
$ |
17,353 |
|
Securities available for sale fair value |
|
|
15,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings cummulative effect adjustment, before tax |
|
|
(2,335 |
) |
Tax impact |
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings cummulative effect, adjustment, after tax |
|
$ |
(1,518 |
) |
|
|
|
|
16
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
SFAS #157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS #157
also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard
describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active
markets. Level 1 instruments include securities traded on active exchange markets, such as
the New York Stock Exchange, as well as U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers
or brokers in active over-the-counter markets.
Level 2: Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets,
quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and
model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in
the market. Level 2 instruments include securities traded in less active dealer or broker
markets.
Level 3: Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one
significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect
estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow
models and similar techniques.
We used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value:
Securities: Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities (trading or
available for sale) are classified as level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities
include certain preferred stocks, trust preferred securities and mutual funds for which there are
quoted prices in active markets. If quoted market prices are not available for the specific
security, then fair values are estimated by (1) using quoted market prices of securities with
similar characteristics, (2) matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the
industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for specific
securities but rather by relying on the securities relationship to other benchmark quoted prices,
or (3) a discounted cash flow analysis whose significant fair value inputs can generally be
verified and do not typically involve judgment by management. These securities are classified as
level 2 of the valuation hierarchy and include mortgage and other asset backed securities,
municipal securities, certain trust preferred securities and one preferred stock security. Certain
other securities fair values are based upon (1) an internal methodology that compares the
observable market yield of the underlying security with the yield of the actual preferred stock and
(2) on a liquidity agreement included in the bond indenture. These securities are classified as
level 3 of the valuation hierarchy and include one municipal security and one preferred stock
security.
Loans held for sale: The fair value of loans held for sale is based on mortgage backed security
pricing for comparable assets.
Loans: From time to time, certain loans are considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses
is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be
made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a
loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment
17
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
in accordance with SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, (SFAS
#114). The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including
collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted
cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair
value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At
March 31, 2008, substantially all of the total impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair
value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market
price, we record the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an appraised value or when an
appraised value is not available, we record the
impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3.
Brokered time deposits: The fair value of brokered time deposits is determined using a discounted
cash flow model whose significant fair value inputs can generally be verified and do not typically
involve judgment by management.
Capitalized mortgage loan servicing rights: The fair value of capitalized mortgage loan servicing
rights is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated net servicing
income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in
estimating future net servicing income. The valuation model inputs and results can be compared to
widely available published industry data for reasonableness.
Derivatives The fair value of derivatives, in general, is determined using a discounted cash flow
model whose significant fair value inputs can generally be verified and do not typically involve
judgment by management.
18
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value, including financial liabilities for which we have
elected the fair value option, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Values for the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 for items Measured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
at Fair Value Pursuant to Election |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 Using |
|
of the Fair Value Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Fair |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Markets |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values |
|
|
Measure- |
|
for |
|
Other |
|
Un- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included |
|
|
ments |
|
Identical |
|
Observable |
|
observable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Current |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Assets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
Net Gains on Assets |
|
Period |
|
|
2008 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Securities |
|
Loans |
|
Earnings |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities |
|
$ |
12,855 |
|
|
$ |
9,985 |
|
|
$ |
2,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,163 |
) |
Securities available
for sale |
|
|
345,478 |
|
|
|
2,651 |
|
|
|
321,330 |
|
|
$ |
21,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
33,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered time
deposits |
|
|
104,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (1) |
|
|
1,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized mortgage
loan servicing
rights |
|
|
15,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
68,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
Interest income is recorded within the Consolidated Statements of Operations based on the
contractual amount of interest income earned on these financial assets. Dividend income is recorded
based on cash dividends.
The following represent impairment charges recognized during the quarter relating to assets
measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
|
|
|
Capitalized mortgage loan servicing rights, whose individual strata are measured at the
lower of cost or fair value had a carrying amount of $16.3 million with a valuation
allowance of $1.0 million at March 31, 2008. A charge of $0.7 million was included in
earnings during the first three months of 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Loans which are measured for impairment using the fair value of collateral for
collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $84.0 million, with a valuation
allowance of $15.3 million at March 31, 2008. An additional provision for loan losses of
$5.5 million was included in earnings during the first three months of 2008 relating to
impaired loans. |
19
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
The table below presents a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on
a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the quarter ended March 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
Available |
|
|
|
For Sale |
|
Beginning balance, January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
21,497 |
|
Total gains (losses) realized and unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements |
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
21,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to |
|
|
|
|
assets still held at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reflects the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate
remaining contractual principal balance outstanding as of March 31, 2008, for loans held for sale
for which the fair value option has been elected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Difference |
|
Principal |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Loans held for sale |
|
$ |
33,056 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
$ |
32,656 |
|
12. The results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008, are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
20
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following section presents additional information that may be necessary to assess our financial
condition and results of operations. This section should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this report as well as our 2007 Annual
Report on Form 10-K. The Form 10-K includes a list of risk factors that you should consider in
connection with any decision to buy or sell our securities.
Bank charter consolidation In September 2007 we completed the consolidation of our four bank
charters into one. The primary reasons for this bank consolidation were:
|
|
|
To better streamline our operations and corporate governance structure; |
|
|
|
|
To enhance our risk management processes, particularly credit risk management through
more centralized credit management functions; |
|
|
|
|
To allow for more rapid development and deployment of new products and services; and |
|
|
|
|
To improve productivity and resource utilization leading to lower non-interest
expenses. |
Other than approximately $4 million to $4.5 million (pre-tax) in annual reductions in non-interest
expenses, and except as noted above, we do not expect the bank consolidation to have a material
impact on our financial condition or results of operations. However, to date the benefit of these
reductions in non-interest expenses due to the bank consolidation have been more than offset by
higher loan and collection costs and increased staffing associated with the management of
significantly higher levels of watch credits, non-performing loans and other real estate owned.
(See Portfolio Loans and asset quality.)
Branch acquisition We completed the acquisition of ten branches with total deposits of
approximately $241.4 million from TCF National Bank on March 23, 2007 (the branch acquisition).
These branches are located in or near Battle Creek, Bay City and Saginaw, Michigan. As a result of
this transaction, we received $210.1 million of cash. We used the proceeds from this transaction
primarily to payoff higher costing short term borrowings and brokered certificates of deposit
(Brokered CDs). The acquisition of these branches resulted in a subsequent increase in
non-interest income, particularly service charges on deposit accounts and VISA check card
interchange income. However, non-interest expenses also increased due to compensation and benefits
for the employees at these branches as well as occupancy, furniture and equipment, data processing,
communications, supplies and advertising expenses. As is customary in branch acquisitions, the
purchase price ($28.1 million) was based on acquired deposit balances. We also reimbursed the
seller $0.2 million for certain transaction related costs. Approximately $10.8 million of the
premium paid was recorded as deposit customer relationship value, including core deposit value and
is being amortized over 15 years (the remainder of the premium paid was recorded as goodwill). The
branch acquisition has resulted in an increase in the amount of amortization of intangible assets.
We also incurred other transaction costs (primarily investment banking fees, legal fees, severance
costs and data processing conversion fees) of approximately $0.8 million, about half of which was
capitalized as part of the acquisition price and the balance was expensed in the first quarter of
2007. In addition, the transaction included $3.7 million for the personal property and real estate
associated with these branches.
21
Discontinued operations On January 15, 2007, Mepco Insurance Premium Financing, Inc., now known as
Mepco Finance Corporation (Mepco), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Independent Bank
Corporation, sold substantially all of its assets related to the insurance premium finance business
to Premium Financing Specialists, Inc. Mepco continues to own and operate its warranty payment
plan business. The assets, liabilities and operations of Mepcos insurance premium finance
business have been reclassified as discontinued operations.
Results of Operations
Summary Net income from continuing operations totaled $0.3 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to $3.9 million during the comparable period in 2007. The decline in net
income from continuing operations in 2008 is primarily due to securities losses, an impairment
charge on capitalized originated mortgage loan servicing rights and increases in the provision for
loan losses and non-interest expenses. These changes were partially offset by increases in net
interest income and gains on loan sales and a reduction of federal income taxes due to the release
of a previously established tax reserve resulting from a favorable development on the treatment of
a particular tax position.
Key performance ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
ended March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Net income from continuing
operations (annualized) to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
|
0.48 |
% |
Average equity |
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
|
Net income (annualized) to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets |
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
|
0.53 |
% |
Average equity |
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
6.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share from
continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
Earnings per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
Our focus is on long-term results, taking into consideration certain components of our revenues
that are cyclical in nature (such as mortgage banking) which can cause fluctuations in our earnings
per share from year to year. Historically, we were successful in growing earnings per share. For
example, we achieved an average annual compound growth rate in earnings per share of 18% for the
five year period from 2000 through 2005. Our primary strategies for achieving long-term growth in
earnings per share include: earning asset growth (both organic and through acquisitions),
diversification of revenues (within the financial services industry), effective capital management
(efficient use of our shareholders equity) and sound risk management (credit, interest rate,
liquidity and regulatory risks). Based on these standards, we did not achieve our profitability
objectives during the first three months of 2008 or in 2007 or 2006. A significant increase in our
provision for loan losses was the primary factor contributing to reduced profitability.
22
Net interest income Net interest income is the most important source of our earnings and thus is
critical in evaluating our results of operations. Changes in our tax equivalent net interest income
are primarily influenced by our level of interest-earning assets and the income or yield that we
earn on
those assets and the manner and cost of funding our interest-earning assets. Certain macro-economic
factors can also influence our net interest income such as the level and direction of interest
rates, the difference between short-term and long-term interest rates (the steepness of the yield
curve) and the general strength of the economies in which we are doing business. Finally, risk
management plays an important role in our level of net interest income. The ineffective management
of credit risk and interest-rate risk in particular can adversely impact our net interest income.
Tax equivalent net interest income totaled $31.8 million during the first quarter of 2008, which
represents a $0.6 million or 1.8% increase from the comparable quarter one year earlier. We review
yields on certain asset categories and our net interest margin on a fully taxable equivalent basis.
This presentation is not in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) but
is customary in the banking industry. In this non-GAAP presentation, net interest income is
adjusted to reflect tax-exempt interest income on an equivalent before-tax basis. This measure
ensures comparability of net interest income arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. The
adjustments to determine tax equivalent net interest income were $1.4 million and $1.6 million for
the first quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively, and were computed using a 35% tax rate.
The increase in tax equivalent net interest income primarily reflects a 7 basis point rise in our
tax equivalent net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets (the net
interest margin) that was partially offset by a $2.8 million decrease in the balance of average
interest-earning assets. The decrease in average interest-earning assets is due to a decline in
investment securities.
Our tax equivalent net interest income is also adversely impacted by our level of non-accrual
loans. In the first quarter of 2008 non-accrual loans averaged $83.0 million compared to $39.5
million in the first quarter of 2007. In addition, we reversed $0.8 million of accrued and unpaid
interest on loans placed on non-accrual in the first quarter of 2008 compared to $0.3 million
during the first quarter of 2007.
The net interest margin was equal to 4.30% during the first quarter of 2008 compared to 4.23% in
the first quarter of 2007. The tax equivalent yield on average interest-earning assets declined to
7.37% in the first quarter of 2008 from 7.74% in the first quarter of 2007. This decrease
primarily reflects lower short-term interest rates that have resulted in variable rate loans
re-pricing and new loans being originated at lower rates as well as the aforementioned increase in
non-accrual loans. The decrease in the tax equivalent yield on average interest-earning assets was
more than offset by a 44 basis point decline in our interest expense as a percentage of average
interest-earning assets (the cost of funds) to 3.07% during the first quarter of 2008 from 3.51%
during the first quarter of 2007. The decrease in the our cost of funds also reflects lower
short-term interest rates that have resulted in decreased rates on certain short-term and variable
rate borrowings and on deposits.
23
Average Balances and Tax Equivalent Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable loans (1) |
|
$ |
2,564,643 |
|
|
$ |
48,013 |
|
|
|
7.52 |
% |
|
$ |
2,509,746 |
|
|
$ |
49,849 |
|
|
|
8.02 |
% |
Tax-exempt loans (1,2) |
|
|
9,628 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
7.27 |
|
|
|
9,513 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
6.82 |
|
Taxable securities |
|
|
162,170 |
|
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
|
185,139 |
|
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
Tax-exempt securities (2) |
|
|
204,890 |
|
|
|
3,586 |
|
|
|
7.04 |
|
|
|
238,654 |
|
|
|
4,121 |
|
|
|
7.00 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
24,522 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
5.86 |
|
|
|
25,563 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Earning
Assets -
Continuing
Operations |
|
|
2,965,853 |
|
|
|
54,434 |
|
|
|
7.37 |
|
|
|
2,968,615 |
|
|
|
56,921 |
|
|
|
7.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
52,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
loans discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
225,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
3,244,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,260,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings and NOW |
|
$ |
998,429 |
|
|
|
3,565 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
$ |
903,426 |
|
|
|
4,249 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
1,099,345 |
|
|
|
12,647 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
|
|
|
1,506,171 |
|
|
|
18,159 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
|
|
|
2,994 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
4.61 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
529,439 |
|
|
|
6,425 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
|
|
199,667 |
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
|
6.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Bearing
Liabilities-
Continuing
Operations |
|
|
2,628,207 |
|
|
|
22,649 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
2,612,258 |
|
|
|
25,712 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
289,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time
deposits discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
83,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
242,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders
equity |
|
$ |
3,244,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,260,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Equivalent Net Interest
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Equivalent Net Interest
Income
as a Percent of
Earning Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All domestic |
|
(2) |
|
Interest on tax-exempt loans and securities is presented on a fully tax equivalent basis
assuming a marginal tax rate of 35% |
Provision for loan losses The provision for loan losses was $11.3 million and $8.1 million during
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The provision reflects our assessment
of the allowance for loan losses taking into consideration factors such as loan mix, levels of
non-performing and classified loans and net charge-offs. While we use relevant information to
recognize losses on loans, additional provisions for related losses may be necessary based on
changes in economic conditions, customer circumstances and other credit risk factors. (See
Portfolio Loans and asset quality.) The substantial increase in the provision for loan losses in
the first quarter of 2008 primarily reflects higher levels of non-performing loans and loan net
charge-offs.
24
Non-interest income Non-interest income is a significant element in assessing our results of
operations. On a long-term basis we are attempting to grow non-interest income in order to
diversify our revenues within the financial services industry. We regard net gains on mortgage
loan sales as a core recurring source of revenue but they are quite cyclical and volatile. We
regard net gains (losses) on securities as a non-operating component of non-interest income. As
a result, we believe it is best to evaluate our success in growing non-interest income and
diversifying our revenues by also comparing non-interest income when excluding net gains (losses)
on assets (mortgage loans and securities).
Non-interest income totaled $9.5 million during the first three months of 2008 compared to $10.7
million in 2007. Excluding net gains and losses on assets, non-interest income grew by 2.9% to
$9.8 million during the first three months of 2008 compared to 2007.
Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
5,647 |
|
|
$ |
4,888 |
|
Net gains (losses) on assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans |
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
Securities |
|
|
(2,163 |
) |
|
|
79 |
|
VISA check card interchange income |
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
Mortgage loan servicing |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
527 |
|
Mutual fund and annuity commissions |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
Title insurance fees |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
Manufactured home loan origination fees
and commissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,774 |
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
9,492 |
|
|
$ |
10,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposits totaled $5.6 million in the first quarter of 2008, a $0.8 million or
15.5% increase from the comparable period in 2007. The increase in such service charges
principally relates to the aforementioned branch acquisition.
Gains on the sale of mortgage loans were $1.9 million and $1.1 million in the first quarters of
2008 and 2007, respectively. The gains in the first quarter of 2008 were increased by a $0.4
million adjustment related to the election, effective January 1, 2008, of fair value accounting
pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS #159) for mortgage loans held for sale. These
gains were also increased by $0.4 million related to the adoption of Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
109, Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value through Earnings, on commitments to
originate mortgage loans. Mortgage loan sales totaled $84.4 million in the first quarter of 2008
compared to $69.2 million in the first quarter of 2007. Mortgage loans originated totaled $118.2
million in the first quarter of 2008 compared to $116.8 million in the comparable quarter of 2007.
The growth in mortgage loan originations is primarily due to a
25
decline in mortgage loan interest
rates leading to an increase in refinancing activity. However, this growth was substantially offset
by a decline in purchase money mortgage activity due to lower home sales volumes.
Mortgage Loan Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Mortgage loans originated |
|
$ |
118,242 |
|
|
$ |
116,815 |
|
Mortgage loans sold |
|
|
84,449 |
|
|
|
69,212 |
|
Mortgage loans sold with servicing rights released |
|
|
7,882 |
|
|
|
11,679 |
|
Net gains on the sale of mortgage loans |
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
Net gains as a percent of mortgage loans sold
(Loans Sale Margin) |
|
|
2.21 |
% |
|
|
1.56 |
% |
SFAS #133/159 adjustments included in the Loan Sale Margin |
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
The volume of loans sold is dependent upon our ability to originate mortgage loans as well as the
demand for fixed-rate obligations and other loans that we cannot profitably fund within established
interest-rate risk parameters. (See Portfolio Loans and asset quality.) Net gains on mortgage
loans are also dependent upon economic and competitive factors as well as our ability to
effectively manage exposure to changes in interest rates. As a result, this category of revenue
can be quite cyclical and volatile.
Pursuant to SFAS #159, we elected, effective January 1, 2008, to measure the majority of our
preferred stock investments at fair value. As a result of this election, we recorded net losses on
securities of $2.2 million in the first quarter of 2008. This loss represents the change in fair
value of these preferred stocks between the beginning and end of the first quarter of 2008. At
March 31, 2008 these preferred stocks had a total fair value of $12.9 million. This preferred
stock portfolio included issues of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Merrill Lynch and Goldman Sachs.
Changes in the fair value of these securities will now be recorded as a component of non-interest
income each quarter. At January 1, 2008 the amortized cost basis of these preferred stocks exceeded
the fair value by $2.3 million. We also recorded an after tax cumulative reduction of $1.5 million
to retained earnings on January 1, 2008 associated with the initial adoption of SFAS #159 for these
preferred stocks. We did not record any other than temporary impairment charges on securities in
either the first quarter of 2008 or 2007. (See Securities.)
VISA check card interchange income increased to $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2008 compared
to $1.0 million in the first quarter of 2007. These results can be attributed to an increase in
the size of our card base due primarily to the aforementioned branch acquisition and a rise in the
frequency of use of our VISA check card product by our customer base. In the first quarter of 2007
we implemented a rewards program for our VISA check card customers to encourage greater use of this
product.
Mortgage loan servicing resulted in a loss of $0.3 million in the first quarter of 2008 compared to
income of $0.5 million in the year-ago period. This decline is primarily due to a $0.7 million
impairment charge recorded on capitalized mortgage loan servicing rights in the first quarter of
2008 (compared to a $0.1 million impairment charge in the first quarter of 2007) as well as a
26
$0.2
million increase in the amortization of this asset due to a rise in mortgage loan prepayment
activity. Activity related to capitalized mortgage loan servicing rights is as follows:
Capitalized Mortgage Loan Servicing Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
15,780 |
|
|
$ |
14,782 |
|
Originated servicing rights capitalized |
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
(407 |
) |
(Increase)/decrease in impairment reserve |
|
|
(725 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
15,297 |
|
|
$ |
14,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment reserve at end of period |
|
$ |
1,044 |
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2008 we were servicing approximately $1.64 billion in mortgage loans for others on
which servicing rights have been capitalized. This servicing portfolio had a weighted average
coupon rate of approximately 6.06% and a weighted average service fee of 25.7 basis points.
Remaining capitalized real estate mortgage loan servicing rights at March 31, 2008 totaled $15.3
million and had an estimated fair market value of $17.4 million.
Mutual fund and annuity commissions declined in 2008 compared to 2007 due to decreased sales of
these products primarily as a result of unsettled conditions in the financial markets that are
believed to have adversely impacted sales.
Income from bank owned life insurance increased in 2008 primarily due to a higher balance of such
insurance on which the crediting rate was applied.
Title insurance fees increased slightly during the first quarter of 2008 compared to the first
quarter of 2007 primarily as a result of a small increase in mortgage lending origination volume.
We closed down our mobile home lending subsidiary (First Home Financial) in June 2007. As a
result, there were no manufactured home loan origination fees and commissions in the first quarter
of 2008. (Also see Non-interest expense below for a discussion of a goodwill impairment charge
recorded in the first quarter of 2007 related to this business.)
Other non-interest income in the first quarter of 2008 includes revenue of $0.4 million from the
redemption of 8,551 shares of Visa, Inc. Class B Common Stock as part of the Visa initial public
offering. We continue to hold 13,566 shares of Visa, Inc. Class B Common Stock at March 31, 2008.
Non-interest expense Non-interest expense is an important component of our results of operations.
However, we primarily focus on revenue growth, and while we strive to efficiently manage our cost
structure, our non-interest expenses will generally increase from year to year because we are
expanding our operations through acquisitions and by opening new branches and loan production
offices.
27
Non-interest expense totaled $30.3 million in the first quarter of 2008 compared to $28.0 million
in the year-ago period. Several categories of operating costs (such as occupancy, data processing
and communications) increased in 2008 primarily related to the aforementioned branch acquisition.
Compensation and employee benefits expenses in 2008 were also impacted by merit pay increases that
were effective January 1, 2008.
Non-Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
10,156 |
|
|
$ |
10,001 |
|
Performance-based compensation and benefits |
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
1,321 |
|
Other benefits |
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits |
|
|
14,184 |
|
|
|
13,968 |
|
Occupancy, net |
|
|
3,114 |
|
|
|
2,614 |
|
Loan and collection |
|
|
1,925 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
Advertising |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
Credit card and bank service fees |
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
Communications |
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
Deposit insurance |
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
Supplies |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
Legal and professional |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
Branch acquisition and conversion costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
343 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
1,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
$ |
30,251 |
|
|
$ |
27,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and collection expenses have increased primarily due to the rise in non-performing loans.
(See Portfolio Loans and asset quality.)
Deposit insurance expense increased by $0.7 million in the first quarter of 2008 compared to the
year-ago period reflecting higher rates and the full utilization of our assessment credits in 2007.
The branch acquisition and conversion costs of $0.4 million in the first quarter of 2007
principally relate to data processing conversion and check printing costs (for replacing these new
customers old checks).
The goodwill impairment charge of $0.3 million relates to First Home Financial (FHF) which we
acquired in 1998. FHF was a loan origination company based in Grand Rapids, Michigan that
specialized in the financing of manufactured homes located in mobile home parks or communities.
FHF ceased operations in the second quarter of 2007 and the remaining goodwill associated with this
entity of $0.3 million was written off in the first quarter of 2007.
28
Other non-interest expense in the first quarter of 2008 includes a reversal of a $0.15 million
expense previously recorded for our allocable portion of the Visa litigation settlement because of
the aforementioned Visa initial public offering.
Income tax expense (benefit) Changes in our income tax expense (benefit) are generally commensurate
with the changes in our pre-tax earnings (loss) from continuing operations. Our actual income tax
expense (benefit) is different than the amount computed by applying our statutory federal income
tax rate to our pre-tax earnings (loss) primarily due to tax-exempt interest income and income on
life insurance. We anticipate that our effective income tax rate for 2008 will be approximately
22%. The first quarter 2008 income tax benefit includes a $1.6 million reduction in our federal
income taxes due to the release of a previously established tax reserve resulting from a favorable
development on the treatment of a particular tax issue prevalent in the banking industry.
Discontinued operations, net of tax See Discontinued operations above for a description of the
sale of Mepcos insurance premium finance business in January 2007. Discontinued operations
produced net income of $0.4 million in the first quarter of 2007.
Financial Condition
Summary Our total assets decreased by $28.7 million during the first three months of 2008. Loans,
excluding loans held for sale (Portfolio Loans), totaled $2.538 billion at March 31, 2008, down
slightly from December 31, 2007. (See Portfolio Loans and asset quality.)
Deposits totaled $2.252 billion at March 31, 2008, compared to $2.505 billion at December 31, 2007.
The $253.3 million decrease in total deposits during the period is due entirely to a sharp decline
in Brokered CDs. Other borrowings totaled $543.2 million at March 31, 2008, an increase of $240.6
million from December 31, 2007. These changes reflect the payoff or call of Brokered CDs that were
replaced with borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank or Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis.
Interest rates on Brokered CDs remained elevated compared to other funding sources throughout the
first quarter of 2008.
Securities We maintain diversified securities portfolios, which include obligations of U.S.
government-sponsored agencies, securities issued by states and political subdivisions, corporate
securities, mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities. We also invest in capital
securities, which include preferred stocks and trust preferred securities. We regularly evaluate
asset/liability management needs and attempt to maintain a portfolio structure that provides
sufficient liquidity and cash flow. We believe that the unrealized losses on securities available
for sale are temporary in nature and are expected to be recovered within a reasonable time period.
We believe that we have the ability to hold securities with unrealized losses to maturity or until
such time as the unrealized losses reverse. (See Asset/liability management.)
29
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
341,921 |
|
|
$ |
7,833 |
|
|
$ |
4,276 |
|
|
$ |
345,478 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
363,237 |
|
|
|
6,013 |
|
|
|
5,056 |
|
|
|
364,194 |
|
Securities available for sale declined slightly during the first quarter of 2008 because maturities
and principal payments in the portfolio were not replaced with new purchases. In addition, on
January 1, 2008 we transferred $15.0 million of preferred stock investments from available for sale
securities to trading securities.
As discussed earlier, we elected effective January 1, 2008, to measure the majority of our
preferred stock investments at fair value pursuant to SFAS #159. We did not record any other than
temporary impairment charges on any investment securities during the first quarters of 2008 or
2007.
Sales of securities were as follows (See Non-interest income.):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Proceeds |
|
$ |
7,913 |
|
|
$ |
6,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross gains |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
Gross losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
SFAS #159 fair value adjustments |
|
$ |
(2,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gains (losses) |
|
$ |
(2,163 |
) |
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Loans and asset quality In addition to the communities served by our bank branch network,
our principal lending markets also include nearby communities and metropolitan areas. Subject to
established underwriting criteria, we also participate in commercial lending transactions with
certain non-affiliated banks and may also purchase real estate mortgage loans from third-party
originators.
The senior management and board of directors of our bank retain authority and responsibility for
credit decisions and we have adopted uniform underwriting standards. Our loan committee structure
and the loan review process, attempt to provide requisite controls and promote compliance with such
established underwriting standards. There can be no assurance that the aforementioned lending
procedures and the use of uniform underwriting standards will prevent us from the possibility of
incurring significant credit losses in our lending activities and in fact the provision for loan
losses increased in the first quarter of 2008 as well as in 2007 and 2006 from prior historical
levels.
30
One of the purposes of the aforementioned bank consolidation is to promote even stronger risk
management practices, particularly in the area of credit risk management. We hired a new Chief
Lending Officer (CLO) in April 2007. The CLO has implemented several changes in our credit
processes, including:
|
|
|
Functional alignment of lending and credit across all of our markets; |
|
|
|
|
The strategic direction of commercial lending has been focused on the need for more
diversification in the commercial loan portfolio to reduce the weighting of commercial
real estate in the portfolio; and |
|
|
|
|
Expansion of certain functions including implementation of a special assets group to
provide stronger management of our most troubled loans. |
Our 2003 acquisition of Mepco added financing of insurance premiums for businesses and the
administration of payment plans to purchase vehicle service contracts for consumers (warranty
finance) to our business activities. In January 2007 we sold Mepcos insurance premium finance
business. Mepco conducts its warranty finance activities across the United States. Mepco
generally does not evaluate the creditworthiness of the individual customer but instead primarily
relies on the payment plan collateral (the unearned vehicle service contract and unearned sales
commission) in the event of default. As a result, we have established and monitor counterparty
concentration limits in order to manage our collateral exposure. The counterparty concentration
limits are primarily based on the AM Best rating and statutory surplus level for an insurance
company and on other factors, including financial
evaluation and distribution of concentrations, for warranty administrators and warranty
sellers/dealers. The sudden failure of one of Mepcos major counterparties (an insurance company,
warranty administrator, or seller/dealer) could expose us to significant losses.
Mepco also has established procedures for payment plan servicing/administration and collections,
including the timely cancellation of the vehicle service contract, in order to protect our
collateral position in the event of default. Mepco also has established procedures to attempt to
prevent and detect fraud since the payment plan origination activities and initial customer contact
is entirely done through unrelated third parties (automobile warranty administrators and sellers or
automobile dealerships). There can be no assurance that the aforementioned risk management
policies and procedures will prevent us from the possibility of incurring significant credit or
fraud related losses in this business segment.
We generally retain loans that may be profitably funded within established risk parameters. (See
Asset/liability management.) As a result, we may hold adjustable-rate and balloon real estate
mortgage loans as Portfolio Loans, while 15- and 30-year, fixed-rate obligations are generally sold
to mitigate exposure to changes in interest rates. (See Non-interest income.)
Future growth of overall Portfolio Loans is dependent upon a number of competitive and economic
factors. Overall loan growth has slowed during the past two years reflecting both weak economic
conditions in Michigan as well as a very competitive pricing climate. However, finance receivables
(warranty payment plans) have been growing. This growth reflects both increased sales efforts as
well as our ability to focus solely on this line of business at Mepco because of the sale of our
insurance premium finance business in January 2007. Construction and land development loans have
been declining recently because we are seeking to shrink this portion of our Portfolio Loans due to
a very poor economic climate for real estate development,
31
particularly residential real estate.
Declines in Portfolio Loans or continuing competition that leads to lower relative pricing on new
Portfolio Loans could adversely impact our future operating results. We continue to view loan
growth consistent with established quality and profitability standards as a major short and
long-term challenge.
Non-performing assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
$ |
95,096 |
|
|
$ |
72,682 |
|
Loans 90 days or more past due and
still accruing interest |
|
|
6,921 |
|
|
|
4,394 |
|
Restructured loans |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
102,186 |
|
|
|
77,249 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
12,589 |
|
|
|
9,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
114,775 |
|
|
$ |
86,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percent of Portfolio Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans |
|
|
4.03 |
% |
|
|
3.03 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
1.97 |
|
|
|
1.78 |
|
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
3.53 |
|
|
|
2.65 |
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of
non-performing loans |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
The increase in total non-performing loans since year end 2007 is due primarily to an increase in
non-performing commercial loans, which totaled $72.1 million at March 31, 2008 compared to $49.0
million at December 31, 2007. The increase in non-performing commercial loans is primarily
attributable to the addition of several large credits with real estate developers becoming past due
in 2008. These delinquencies largely reflect cash flow difficulties encountered by many real
estate developers in Michigan as they confront a significant decline in sales of real estate. In
addition we continue to have an elevated level of non-performing mortgage loans (which totaled
$24.8 million at March 31, 2008 compared to $23.1 million at December 31, 2007) due primarily to a
rise in foreclosures reflecting both weak economic conditions and soft residential real estate
values in many parts of Michigan.
Other real estate (ORE) and repossessed assets totaled $12.6 million at March 31, 2008, compared
to $9.7 million at December 31, 2007. This increase is the result of the migration of
non-performing loans secured by real estate into ORE as the foreclosure process is completed and
any redemption period expires. Higher foreclosure rates are evident nationwide, but Michigan has
consistently had one of the higher foreclosure rates in the U.S. during the past year. We believe
that this higher foreclosure rate is due to both weak economic conditions (Michigan has the highest
unemployment rate in the U.S.) and declining residential real estate values (which has eroded or
eliminated the equity that many mortgagors had in their home). Because the redemption period on
foreclosures is relatively long in Michigan (six months to one year) and we have many
non-performing loans that were in the process of foreclosure at March 31, 2008, we anticipate that
our level of other real estate and repossessed assets will continue to rise during 2008 and will
likely remain at elevated levels for some period of time. A high level of non-performing assets
would be expected to adversely impact our tax equivalent net interest income.
32
We will place a loan that is 90 days or more past due on non-accrual, unless we believe the loan is
both well secured and in the process of collection. Accordingly, we have determined that the
collection of the accrued and unpaid interest on any loans that are 90 days or more past due and
still accruing interest is probable.
The ratio of loan net charge-offs to average loans was 1.07% on an annualized basis in the first
quarter of 2008 (or $6.8 million) compared to 0.65% in the first quarter of 2007 (or $4.0 million).
The rise in loan net charge-offs reflects increases of $1.6 million for commercial loans and $1.4
million for residential mortgage loans. These increases in loan net charge-offs primarily reflect
higher levels of non-performing assets and lower collateral liquidation values, particularly on
residential real estate or real estate held for development.
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Commitments |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Commitments |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
45,294 |
|
|
$ |
1,936 |
|
|
$ |
26,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,881 |
|
Additions (deduction) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision charged to operating expense |
|
|
11,383 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
7,989 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Recoveries credited to allowance |
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged against the allowance |
|
|
(7,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
49,911 |
|
|
$ |
1,869 |
|
|
$ |
30,908 |
|
|
$ |
2,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged against the allowance to
average Portfolio Loans (annualized) |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
In determining the allowance and the related provision for credit losses, we consider four
principal elements: (i) specific allocations based upon probable losses identified during the
review of the loan portfolio, (ii) allocations established for other adversely rated loans, (iii)
allocations based principally on historical loan loss experience, and (iv) additional allowances
based on subjective factors, including local and general economic business factors and trends,
portfolio concentrations and changes in the size, mix and/or the general terms of the loan
portfolios.
The first element reflects our estimate of probable losses based upon our systematic review of
specific loans. These estimates are based upon a number of objective factors, such as payment
history, financial condition of the borrower, and discounted collateral exposure.
The second element reflects the application of our loan rating system. This rating system is
similar to those employed by state and federal banking regulators. Loans that are rated below a
certain predetermined classification are assigned a loss allocation factor for each loan
classification category that is based upon a historical analysis of both the probability of default
and the expected loss rate (loss given default). The lower the rating assigned to a loan or
category, the greater the allocation percentage that is applied. For higher rated loans
(non-watch credit) we again determine a probability of default and loss given default in order to
apply an allocation percentage.
33
The third element is determined by assigning allocations to homogeneous loan groups based
principally upon the five-year average of loss experience for each type of loan. Recent years are
weighted more heavily in this average. Average losses may be further adjusted based on an analysis
of delinquent loans. Loss analyses are conducted at least annually.
The fourth element is based on factors that cannot be associated with a specific credit or loan
category and reflects our attempt to ensure that the overall allowance for loan losses
appropriately reflects a margin for the imprecision necessarily inherent in the estimates of
expected credit losses. We consider a number of subjective factors when determining the unallocated
portion, including local and general economic business factors and trends, portfolio concentrations
and changes in the size, mix and the general terms of the loan portfolios. (See Provision for
credit losses.)
Mepcos allowance for loan losses is determined in a similar manner as discussed above and
primarily takes into account historical loss experience, unsecured exposure, and other subjective
factors deemed relevant to their lending activities.
The allowance for loan losses increased to 1.97% of total Portfolio Loans at March 31, 2008 from
1.78% at December 31, 2007. This increase is primarily due to increases in two of the four
components of the allowance for loan losses outlined above. The allowance for loan losses related
to specific loans increased due to the rise in non-performing loans described earlier. The
allowance for loan losses related to other adversely rated loans decreased primarily due to the
migration of certain adversely rated loans into the specific allocations category. The allowance
for loan losses related to historical losses decreased slightly due to a small decline in loans
outstanding. Finally, the allowance for loan losses related to subjective factors increased
primarily due to weaker economic conditions in Michigan that have contributed to higher levels of
non-performing loans and net loan charge-offs.
Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Specific allocations |
|
$ |
16,166 |
|
|
$ |
10,713 |
|
Other adversely rated loans |
|
|
9,753 |
|
|
|
10,804 |
|
Historical loss allocations |
|
|
14,512 |
|
|
|
14,668 |
|
Additional allocations based on subjective factors |
|
|
9,480 |
|
|
|
9,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
49,911 |
|
|
$ |
45,294 |
|
|
|
|
We took a variety of steps during 2007 to address the credit issues identified above (higher levels
of watch credits, non-performing loans and other real estate and repossessed assets), including the
following:
|
§ |
|
An enhanced quarterly watch credit review process to proactively manage higher risk
loans. |
|
|
§ |
|
Loan risk ratings are independently assigned and structure recommendations made upfront
by our credit officers. |
34
|
§ |
|
A Special Assets Group has been established to provide more effective management of our
most troubled loans. A select group of law firms supports this team, providing
professional advice and systemic feedback. |
|
|
§ |
|
An independent loan review function provides portfolio/individual loan feedback to
evaluate the effectiveness of processes by market. |
|
|
§ |
|
Management (incentive) objectives for each commercial lender and senior commercial
lender emphasize credit quality in addition to growth and profitability. |
|
|
§ |
|
Portfolio concentrations are monitored with select loan types encouraged and other loan
types (such as residential real estate development) requiring significantly higher
approval authorities. |
Deposits and borrowings Our competitive position within many of the markets served by our branch
network limits our ability to materially increase deposits without adversely impacting the
weighted-average cost of core deposits. Accordingly, we principally compete on the basis of
convenience and personal service, while employing pricing tactics that are intended to enhance the
value of core deposits.
To attract new core deposits, we have implemented a high-performance checking program that utilizes
a combination of direct mail solicitations, in-branch merchandising, gifts for customers opening
new checking accounts or referring business to our bank and branch staff sales training. This
program has generated increases in customer relationships as well as deposit service charges. Over
the past two to three years we have also expanded our treasury management products and services for
commercial businesses and municipalities or other governmental units and have also increased our
sales calling efforts in order to attract additional deposit relationships from these sectors.
Despite these efforts our historic core deposit growth has not kept pace with the historic growth
of our Portfolio Loans. We view long-term core deposit growth as a significant challenge. Core
deposits generally provide a more stable and lower cost source of funds than alternative sources
such as short-term borrowings. As a result, the continued funding of Portfolio Loan growth with
alternative sources of funds (as opposed to core deposits) may erode certain of our profitability
measures, such as return on assets, and may also adversely impact our liquidity. (See Liquidity
and capital resources.) In March 2007 we completed the aforementioned branch acquisition,
principally to increase our core deposits and market share in certain Michigan markets where we
already had a presence.
We have implemented strategies that incorporate federal funds purchased, other borrowings and
Brokered CDs to fund a portion of any increases in interest earning assets. The use of such
alternate sources of funds supplements our core deposits and is also an integral part of our
asset/liability management efforts.
35
Alternative Sources of Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate |
|
Amount |
|
Maturity |
|
Rate |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Brokered CDs(1) |
|
$ |
247,603 |
|
|
2.1 years |
|
|
4.60 |
% |
|
$ |
516,077 |
|
|
1.9 years |
|
|
4.72 |
% |
Fixed rate FHLB advances(1) |
|
|
351,754 |
|
|
1.7 years |
|
|
3.80 |
|
|
|
240,509 |
|
|
1.3 years |
|
|
4.81 |
|
Variable rate FHLB advances(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
.3 years |
|
|
4.35 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to
Repurchase(1) |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
2.7 years |
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
2.9 years |
|
|
4.42 |
|
FRB Discount borrowing |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
.1 years |
|
|
2.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
45,831 |
|
|
1 day |
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
54,452 |
|
|
1 day |
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
830,188 |
|
|
1.5 years |
|
|
3.79 |
% |
|
$ |
866,038 |
|
|
1.6 years |
|
|
4.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain of these items have had their average maturity and rate altered through the use of
derivative instruments, including pay-fixed and pay-variable interest rate swaps. |
Other borrowed funds, principally advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (the FHLB), borrowings
from the Federal Reserve Bank (the FRB) and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
(Repurchase Agreements), totaled $543.2 million at March 31, 2008, compared to $302.5 million at
December 31, 2007. The $240.6 million increase in other borrowed funds principally reflects higher
borrowings from the FRB and FHLB to payoff Brokered CDs that matured or were called. Interest
rates on Brokered CDs remained elevated compared to other funding sources throughout the first
quarter of 2008.
At March 31, 2008, we were out of compliance with certain of the financial covenants relating to
our $10.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement and a term loan credit agreement (that had a
remaining balance of $2.5 million at March 31, 2008). These covenants related to our return on
assets ratio and certain ratios related to non-performing assets. The lender elected to not renew
the $10.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (which matured in April 2008) and required
repayment of the term loan. The $2.5 million term loan was repaid in full in April 2008 (it would
have otherwise been repaid in full in accordance with the original terms in May 2009). As a result
of the termination of the revolving credit facility and the payoff of the term loan in April 2008,
we elected to not seek a waiver of the non-compliance with certain of the debt covenants that
existed at March 31, 2008.
Derivative financial instruments are employed to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates.
(See Asset/liability management.) At March 31, 2008, we employed interest-rate swaps with an
aggregate notional amount of $255.7 million and interest rate caps with an aggregate notional
amount of $290.5 million. (See note #7 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.)
Liquidity and capital resources Liquidity risk is the risk of being unable to timely meet
obligations as they come due at a reasonable funding cost or without incurring unacceptable losses.
Our liquidity management involves the measurement and monitoring of a variety of sources and uses
of funds. Our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows categorize these sources and uses into
operating, investing and financing activities. We primarily focus our liquidity management on
developing access to a variety of borrowing sources to supplement our deposit
gathering activities and provide funds for growing our investment and loan portfolios as well as to
be able to respond to unforeseen liquidity needs.
36
Our sources of funds include a stable deposit base, secured advances from the Federal Home Loan
Bank of Indianapolis, secured borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank, federal funds purchased
borrowing facilities with other commercial banks, and access to the capital markets (for trust
preferred securities and Brokered CDs).
At March 31, 2008 we had $672.5 million of time deposits that mature in the next twelve months.
Historically, a majority of these maturing time deposits are renewed by our customers or are
Brokered CDs that we expect to replace. Additionally $1.296 billion of our deposits at March 31,
2008 were in account types from which the customer could withdraw the funds on demand. Changes in
the balances of deposits that can be withdrawn upon demand are usually predictable and the total
balances of these accounts have generally grown or have been stable over time as a result of our
marketing and promotional activities. There can be no assurance that historical patterns of
renewing time deposits or overall growth in deposits will continue in the future.
We have developed contingency funding plans that stress tests our liquidity needs that may arise
from certain events such as an adverse credit event, rapid loan growth or a disaster recovery
situation. Our liquidity management also includes periodic monitoring that segregates assets
between liquid and illiquid and classifies liabilities as core and non-core. This analysis compares
our total level of illiquid assets to our core funding. It is our goal to have core funding
sufficient to finance illiquid assets.
Over the past several years our Portfolio Loans have generally grown more rapidly than our core
deposits. In addition, much of this growth has been in loan categories that cannot generally be
used as collateral for FHLB advances (such as commercial loans and finance receivables). As a
result, we had become more dependent on wholesale funding sources (such as brokered CDs, FHLB
advances, FRB borrowings, and Repurchase Agreements). The proceeds from the sale of our insurance
premium finance business in January 2007 and from our branch acquisition in March 2007 were
utilized to pay off maturing Brokered CDs or short-term borrowings. These two transactions enabled
us to reduce our wholesale funding by 32.5% during 2007.
Effective management of capital resources is critical to our mission to create value for our
shareholders. The cost of capital is an important factor in creating shareholder value and,
accordingly, our capital structure includes cumulative trust preferred securities.
We also believe that a diversified portfolio of quality loans will provide superior risk-adjusted
returns. Accordingly, we have implemented balance sheet management strategies that combine efforts
to originate Portfolio Loans with disciplined funding strategies. Acquisitions have also
historically been an integral component of our capital management strategies.
We have four special purpose entities that have issued $90.1 million of cumulative trust preferred
securities outside of Independent Bank Corporation. Currently $79.6 million of these securities
qualify as Tier 1 capital and the balance qualify as Tier 2 capital. These entities have also
issued common securities and capital to Independent Bank Corporation. Independent Bank
Corporation, in turn, issued subordinated debentures to these special purpose entities equal to the
trust preferred securities, common securities and capital issued. The subordinated debentures
represent the sole asset of the special purpose entities. The common securities, capital and
subordinated debentures are included in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
37
In March 2006, the Federal Reserve Board issued a final rule that retains trust preferred
securities in the Tier 1 capital of bank holding companies. After a transition period ending March
31, 2009, the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other capital elements
will be limited to 25 percent of Tier 1 capital elements, net of goodwill (net of any associated
deferred tax liability). The amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in
excess of the limit could be included in the Tier 2 capital, subject to restrictions. Based upon
our existing levels of Tier 1 capital, trust preferred securities and goodwill, this final Federal
Reserve Board rule would have reduced our Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio by approximately
86 basis points at March 31, 2008, (this calculation assumes no transition period).
To supplement our balance sheet and capital management activities, we periodically repurchase our
common stock. The level of share repurchases in a given time period generally reflects changes in
our need for capital associated with our balance sheet growth and our level of earnings. Our board
of directors has authorized the repurchase of up to 25,000 shares. This authorization expires on
December 31, 2008. The only share repurchases currently being executed are for our deferred
compensation and stock purchase plan for non-employee directors.
Primarily as a result of an increase in intangible assets associated with the above described
branch acquisition and our cash dividends exceeding our net income over the past six quarters, our
tangible capital ratio (excluding our accumulated other comprehensive income) declined to 4.97% at
March 31, 2008. Our internal Capital Policy generally requires a minimum tangible capital ratio of
at least 5% and a targeted tangible capital ratio range of 5.50% to 6.50%. Since we are currently
outside of this range, it is unlikely that we will be repurchasing any shares of our common stock
over the next several quarters other than minor amounts that are funded by our directors deferring
their directors fees (or until such time as our tangible capital ratio returns to the targeted
range). Further, we have not earned our dividend for six consecutive quarters. Although there are
no specific regulations restricting dividend payments by bank holding companies (other than State
corporate laws) the FRB (our primary federal regulator) has issued a policy statement on cash
dividend payments. The FRB view is that: an organization experiencing earnings weaknesses or
other financial pressures should not maintain a level of cash dividends that exceeds its net
income, that is inconsistent with the organizations capital position, or that can only be funded
in ways that may weaken the organizations financial health. Although the FRB has not sought to
restrict or limit the cash dividends that we have been paying, our board of directors reduced our
April 30, 2008 common stock cash dividend from $0.21 per share to $0.11 per share (or by 47.6%).
We still did not earn this reduced dividend in the first quarter of 2008.
At March 31, 2008 our parent company had cash on hand of $12.5 million. Subsequent to March 31,
2008 we paid an $0.11 per share April 30, 2008 dividend of approximately $2.5 million and the
repayment of the $2.5 million term loan as described above, which were partially offset by a $1.8
million cash dividend paid by our bank to the parent company. The parent company cash on hand was
approximately $9.0 million after these transactions. In addition to any common stock cash
dividend, our parent company has a net after tax interest cost on subordinated debentures related
to our outstanding trust preferred securities of approximately $1.1 million dollars per quarter.
Because of the termination of the $10.0 parent company unsecured revolving credit facility
(described above), in the absence of any future equity offering, the only current incoming cash
flow to our parent company is dividends from our bank. Without prior regulatory approval,
dividends from our bank to our parent company are limited to the banks 2008 net income. Given our
parent companys current cash on hand, we can cover approximately 2 and 1/2 quarters
of our existing common stock cash dividend and net after tax interest cost on the subordinated
38
debentures related to our outstanding trust preferred securities. Thus the continuation of our
current common stock cash dividend is dependent on our bank having sufficient earnings to pay a
regular quarterly cash dividend to our parent company. Our board of directors will determine the
level of our July 31, 2008 quarterly cash dividend on our common stock in late June 2008 after
considering our expected level of earnings for the second quarter of 2008, our capital levels and
our outlook for credit costs.
Capitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Unsecured debt |
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
92,888 |
|
|
|
92,888 |
|
Amount not qualifying as regulatory capital |
|
|
(2,788 |
) |
|
|
(2,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount qualifying as regulatory capital |
|
|
90,100 |
|
|
|
90,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share |
|
|
22,765 |
|
|
|
22,601 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
196,675 |
|
|
|
195,302 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
19,062 |
|
|
|
22,770 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
238,540 |
|
|
|
240,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization |
|
$ |
331,140 |
|
|
$ |
333,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity at March 31, 2008 decreased $2.0 million from December 31, 2007, due
primarily to cash dividends declared that exceeded our net income in the first quarter of 2008.
Shareholders equity totaled $238.5 million, equal to 7.35% of total assets at March 31, 2008. At
December 31, 2007, shareholders equity was $240.5 million, which was equal to 7.34% of total
assets.
Capital ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
Equity capital |
|
|
7.35 |
% |
|
|
7.34 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to average assets |
|
7.50 |
|
|
7.44 |
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital |
|
9.49 |
|
|
9.35 |
|
Total risk-based capital |
|
11.17 |
|
|
|
10.99 |
|
Asset/liability management Interest-rate risk is created by differences in the cash flow
characteristics of our assets and liabilities. Options embedded in certain financial instruments,
including caps on adjustable-rate loans as well as borrowers rights to prepay fixed-rate loans
also create interest-rate risk.
Our asset/liability management efforts identify and evaluate opportunities to structure the balance
sheet in a manner that is consistent with our mission to maintain profitable financial leverage
within established risk parameters. We evaluate various opportunities and alternate
balance-sheet strategies carefully and consider the likely impact on our risk profile as well as
the anticipated contribution to earnings. The marginal cost of funds is a principal consideration
in
39
the implementation of our balance-sheet management strategies, but such evaluations further
consider interest-rate and liquidity risk as well as other pertinent factors. We have established
parameters for interest-rate risk. We regularly monitor our interest-rate risk and report quarterly
to our board of directors.
We employ simulation analyses to monitor our interest-rate risk profile and evaluate potential
changes in our net interest income and market value of portfolio equity that result from changes in
interest rates. The purpose of these simulations is to identify sources of interest-rate risk
inherent in our balance sheet. The simulations do not anticipate any actions that we might initiate
in response to changes in interest rates and, accordingly, the simulations do not provide a
reliable forecast of anticipated results. The simulations are predicated on immediate, permanent
and parallel shifts in interest rates and generally assume that current loan and deposit pricing
relationships remain constant. The simulations further incorporate assumptions relating to changes
in customer behavior, including changes in prepayment rates on certain assets and liabilities.
Changes in Market Value of Portfolio Equity and Tax Equivalent Net Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Equivalent |
|
|
|
|
Of Portfolio |
|
Percent |
|
Net Interest |
|
Percent |
Change in Interest Rates |
|
Equity(1) |
|
Change |
|
Income(2) |
|
Change |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 basis point rise |
|
$ |
234,400 |
|
|
|
(6.16) |
% |
|
$ |
134,600 |
|
|
|
(5.61) |
% |
100 basis point rise |
|
|
247,800 |
|
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
138,800 |
|
|
|
(2.66 |
) |
Base-rate scenario |
|
|
249,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
100 basis point decline |
|
|
229,100 |
|
|
|
(8.29 |
) |
|
|
145,300 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
|
200 basis point decline |
|
|
207,400 |
|
|
|
(16.97 |
) |
|
|
147,000 |
|
|
|
3.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 basis point rise |
|
$ |
229,000 |
|
|
|
(6.87) |
% |
|
$ |
121,600 |
|
|
|
(4.25) |
% |
100 basis point rise |
|
|
241,100 |
|
|
|
(1.95 |
) |
|
|
124,100 |
|
|
|
(2.28 |
) |
Base-rate scenario |
|
|
245,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
100 basis point decline |
|
|
234,100 |
|
|
|
(4.80 |
) |
|
|
128,900 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
200 basis point decline |
|
|
222,200 |
|
|
|
(9.64 |
) |
|
|
130,200 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Simulation analyses calculate the change in the net present value of our assets and
liabilities, including debt and related financial derivative instruments, under parallel
shifts in interest rates by discounting the estimated future cash flows using a market-based
discount rate. Cash flow estimates incorporate anticipated changes in prepayment speeds and
other embedded options. |
|
(2) |
|
Simulation analyses calculate the change in net interest income under immediate parallel
shifts in interest rates over the next twelve months, based upon a static balance sheet,
which includes debt and related financial derivative instruments, and do not consider loan
fees. |
40
Critical Accounting Policies
Our accounting and reporting policies are in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and conform to general practices within the banking
industry. Accounting and reporting policies for other than temporary impairment of investment
securities, the allowance for loan losses, originated mortgage loan servicing rights, derivative
financial instruments, income taxes and goodwill are deemed critical since they involve the use of
estimates and require significant management judgments. Application of assumptions different than
those that we have used could result in material changes in our financial position or results of
operations.
We are required to assess our investment securities for other than temporary impairment on a
periodic basis. The determination of other than temporary impairment for an investment security
requires judgment as to the cause of the impairment, the likelihood of recovery and the projected
timing of the recovery. Our assessment process during the first quarters of 2008 and 2007 resulted
in recording no other than temporary impairment charges on the various investment securities within
our portfolio. However, as described above, we did elect (effective January 1, 2008) fair value
accounting pursuant to SFAS #159 for certain of our preferred stock investments. We believe that
our assumptions and judgments in assessing other than temporary impairment for our investment
securities are reasonable and conform to general industry practices.
Our methodology for determining the allowance and related provision for loan losses is described
above in Portfolio Loans and asset quality. In particular, this area of accounting requires a
significant amount of judgment because a multitude of factors can influence the ultimate collection
of a loan or other type of credit. It is extremely difficult to precisely measure the amount of
losses that are probable in our loan portfolio. We use a rigorous process to attempt to accurately
quantify the necessary allowance and related provision for loan losses, but there can be no
assurance that our modeling process will successfully identify all of the losses that are probable
in our loan portfolio. As a result, we could record future provisions for loan losses that may be
significantly different than the levels that we recorded in the first quarter of 2008.
At March 31, 2008 we had approximately $15.3 million of mortgage loan servicing rights capitalized
on our balance sheet. There are several critical assumptions involved in establishing the value of
this asset including estimated future prepayment speeds on the underlying mortgage loans, the
interest rate used to discount the net cash flows from the mortgage loan servicing, the estimated
amount of ancillary income that will be received in the future (such as late fees) and the
estimated cost to service the mortgage loans. We believe the assumptions that we utilize in our
valuation are reasonable based upon accepted industry practices for valuing mortgage loan servicing
rights and represent neither the most conservative or aggressive assumptions.
We use a variety of derivative instruments to manage our interest rate risk. These derivative
instruments may include interest rate swaps, collars, floors and caps and mandatory forward
commitments to sell real estate mortgage loans. Under SFAS #133 the accounting for increases or
decreases in the value of derivatives depends upon the use of the derivatives and whether the
derivatives qualify for hedge accounting. At March 31, 2008 we had approximately $424.2 million in
notional amount of derivative financial instruments that qualified for hedge accounting under SFAS
#133. As a result, generally, changes in the fair market value of those derivative financial
instruments qualifying as cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income. The changes
in the fair value of those derivative financial instruments qualifying as fair
41
value hedges are
recorded in earnings and, generally, are offset by the change in the fair value of
the hedged item which is also recorded in earnings. The fair value of derivative financial
instruments qualifying for hedge accounting was a negative $2.0 million at March 31, 2008.
Our accounting for income taxes involves the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities
primarily associated with differences in the timing of the recognition of revenues and expenses for
financial reporting and tax purposes. At December 31, 2007 we had recorded a net deferred tax asset
of $18.6 million, which included a net operating loss carryforward of $3.4 million. We have
recorded no valuation allowance on our net deferred tax asset because we believe that the tax
benefits associated with this asset will more likely than not, be realized. However, changes in tax
laws, changes in tax rates and our future level of earnings can adversely impact the ultimate
realization of our net deferred tax asset.
At March 31, 2008 we had recorded $66.8 million of goodwill. Under SFAS #142, amortization of
goodwill ceased, and instead this asset must be periodically tested for impairment. Our goodwill
primarily arose from our 2007 branch acquisition, the 2004 acquisitions of two banks, the 2003
acquisition of Mepco and the past acquisitions of other banks. We test our goodwill for impairment
utilizing the methodology and guidelines established in SFAS #142. This methodology involves
assumptions regarding the valuation of the business segments that contain the acquired entities. We
believe that the assumptions we utilize are reasonable. We did not record any goodwill impairment
charges in the first quarter of 2008 and recorded goodwill impairment charges of $0.3 million in
the first quarter of 2007, as described above under Non-interest expense. We may incur
additional impairment charges related to our goodwill in the future due to changes in business
prospects or other matters that could affect our valuation assumptions.
Fair Valuation of Financial Instruments
On January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial Account Standard No. 157 Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS #157), which defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell
the financial asset or paid to transfer the financial liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date.
We utilize fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain financial
instruments and to determine fair value disclosures. SFAS #157 differentiates between those assets
and liabilities required to be carried at fair value at every reporting period (recurring) and
those assets and liabilities that are only required to be adjusted to fair value under certain
circumstances (nonrecurring). Trading securities, securities available-for-sale, loans held for
sale, brokered CDs and derivatives are financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring
basis. Additionally, from time to time, we may be required to record at fair value other financial
assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held for investment, capitalized mortgage loan
servicing rights and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically
involve application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
Further, the notes to the consolidated financial statements include information about the extent to
which fair value is used to measure assets and liabilities and the valuation methodologies used.
SFAS #157 establishes a three-level hierarchy for disclosure of assets and liabilities recorded at
fair value. The classification of assets and liabilities within the hierarchy is based on whether
the inputs to the valuation methodology used for measurement are observable or unobservable.
42
Observable inputs reflect market-derived or market-based information obtained from independent
sources, while unobservable inputs reflect managements estimates about market data.
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments
traded in active markets. Level 1 instruments include securities
traded on active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock
Exchange, as well as U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by
dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets. |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in
active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments
in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation
techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in
the market. Level 2 instruments include securities traded in less
active dealer or broker markets. |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at
least one significant assumption not observable in the market.
These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing
models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques. |
For assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, it is our policy to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value
measurements, in accordance with the fair value hierarchy in SFAS #157. When available, we utilize
quoted market prices to measure fair value. If market prices are not available, fair value
measurement is based upon models that use primarily market-based or independently sourced market
parameters, including interest rate yield curves, prepayment speeds, and option volatilities.
Substantially all of our financial instruments use either of the foregoing methodologies,
collectively Level 1 and Level 2 measurements, to determine fair value adjustments recorded in our
financial statements. However, in certain cases, when market observable inputs for model-based
valuation techniques may not be readily available, we are required to make judgments about
assumptions market participants would use in estimating the fair value of the financial instrument.
The models we use to determine fair value adjustments are periodically evaluated by management for
relevance under current facts and circumstances.
The degree of management judgment involved in determining the fair value of a financial instrument
is dependent upon the availability of quoted market prices or observable market parameters. For
financial instruments that trade actively and have quoted market prices or observable market
parameters, there is minimal subjectivity involved in measuring fair value. When observable market
prices and parameters are not fully available, management judgment is necessary to estimate fair
value. In addition, changes in market conditions may reduce the availability of quoted prices or
observable data. For example, reduced liquidity in the capital markets or changes in secondary
market activities could result in observable market inputs becoming unavailable. Therefore, when
market data is not available, we would use valuation techniques requiring more management judgment
to estimate the appropriate fair value measurement.
At March 31, 2008, $391.4 million, or 12.1% of total assets, consisted of financial instruments
recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Substantially all of these financial instruments used
valuation methodologies involving market-based or market-derived information, collectively
43
Level 1
and 2 measurements, to measure fair value. Only 5.5% of these financial assets were measured using
model-based techniques, or Level 3 measurements. The financial assets valued
using Level 3 measurements include variable rate demand municipal bonds and an auction rate money
market preferred stock in less liquid markets. At March 31, 2008, 3.5% of total liabilities, or
$106.4 million, consisted of financial instruments (primarily brokered CDs) recorded at fair value
on a recurring basis.
At March 31, 2008, $84.0 million, or 2.6% of total assets, consisted of financial instruments
recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. All of these financial instruments (comprised of
loans held for investment and capitalized mortgage loan servicing rights) used Level 2 and Level 3 measurement
valuation methodologies to measure fair value.
At March 31, 2008, no liabilities were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
In addition to SFAS #157, on January 1, 2008 we also adopted SFAS #159 (fair value accounting) for
certain financial assets as described earlier. We adopted SFAS #159 for loans held for sale (that
prior to January 1, 2008 were recorded at the lower of cost or market) to correspond to the
accounting for the related commitments to sell these loans. We also adopted SFAS #159 for certain
preferred stock investments. These preferred stock investments are perpetual (have no stated
maturity date) and assessing these particular investments for other than temporary impairment is
relatively subjective. As a result, we elected fair value accounting for these preferred stocks
and utilize a quoted market price (Level 1).
See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for a complete discussion on our use of fair
valuation of financial instruments and the related measurement techniques.
Litigation Matters
We are involved in various litigation matters in the ordinary course of business and at the present
time, we do not believe that any of these matters will have a significant impact on our financial
condition or results of operations.
44
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
No material changes in the market risk faced by the Registrant have occurred since December 31,
2007.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
(a) |
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
|
|
|
|
With the participation of management, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e)) for the period ended March 31, 2008, have
concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. |
|
(b) |
|
Changes in Internal Controls.
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, there were no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting. |
45
Part II
Item 2. Changes in securities, use of proceeds and issuer purchases of equity
securities
The following table shows certain information relating to purchases of common stock for the
three-months ended March 31, 2008, pursuant to our share repurchase plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of a |
|
Authorized for |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Average Price |
|
Publicly |
|
Purchase Under |
Period |
|
Shares Purchased(1) |
|
Paid Per Share |
|
Announced Plan(2) |
|
the Plan |
|
January 2008 |
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
$ |
11.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 2008 |
|
|
13,728 |
|
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
14,967 |
|
|
$ |
10.47 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
10,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes shares purchased to fund our Deferred Compensation and Stock
Purchase Plan for Non-employee Directors. |
|
(2) |
|
Our current stock repurchase plan authorizes the purchase up to 25,000 shares
of our common stock. The repurchase plan expires on December 31, 2008. |
Item 6. Exhibits
|
(a) |
|
The following exhibits (listed by number corresponding to the Exhibit Table as Item 601
in Regulation S-K) are filed with this report: |
|
11. |
|
Computation of Earnings Per Share. |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of Independent Bank Corporation
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350). |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Independent Bank Corporation
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350). |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of Independent Bank Corporation
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350). |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Independent Bank Corporation
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350). |
46
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
May 8, 2008
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Robert N. Shuster
Robert N. Shuster, Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
May 8, 2008
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ James J. Twarozynski
James J. Twarozynski, Principal Accounting Officer
|
|
|
47