defr14a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMB APPROVAL |
|
|
|
|
|
OMB Number:
|
|
3235-0059 |
|
|
Expires:
|
|
February 28, 2006 |
|
|
Estimated average burden hours per
response |
12.75 |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
|
|
|
Filed by the Registrant
þ |
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o |
|
|
Check the appropriate box: |
|
|
|
o Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
þ Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
NABORS
INDUSTRIES LTD.
(Name
of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name
of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
þ No fee required. |
|
o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11. |
|
|
|
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
1) Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
SEC 1913 (02-02) |
Persons who are to respond to the collection of information
contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid
OMB control number. |
Mintflower Place
8 Par-La-Ville Road
Ground Floor
Hamilton, HM 08 Bermuda
Notice of 2006 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
Nabors Industries Ltd.
Tuesday, June 6, 2006, 11:00 a.m., CDT
Wyndham Greenspoint Hotel
12400 Greenspoint Drive
Houston, Texas
May 5, 2006
Fellow shareholder:
We cordially invite you to attend Nabors Industries Ltd.s
2006 annual general meeting of shareholders to:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Elect one Class III director for a three-year term;
|
|
|
2.
|
Approve and appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent
auditors and authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors to set the auditors remuneration;
|
|
|
3.
|
Approve the Companys Amended and Restated 2003 Employee
Stock Plan; and
|
|
|
4.
|
Transact such other business as may properly come before the
annual general meeting.
|
Further information regarding the meeting and the above
proposals is set forth in the accompanying proxy statement. You
are entitled to vote at the annual general meeting if you were a
shareholder at the close of business on April 7, 2006. Even
if you plan to attend the annual general meeting, please submit
a proxy as soon as possible so that your shares can be voted at
the annual general meeting in accordance with your instructions.
The financial statements for the Company will also be presented
at the annual general meeting.
We hope you will read the proxy statement and submit your proxy.
On behalf of the Board of Directors and the management of
Nabors, I extend our appreciation for your continued support.
Sincerely yours,
Eugene M. Isenberg
Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NABORS
INDUSTRIES LTD.
Mintflower Place
8 Par-La-Ville Road
Ground Floor
Hamilton, HM 08 Bermuda
2006
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
June 6,
2006
We are sending you this proxy statement in connection with the
solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Nabors
Industries Ltd. for the 2006 annual general meeting of
shareholders. We are mailing this proxy statement and the
accompanying form of proxy to shareholders on or about
May 5, 2006. In this proxy statement, Nabors,
the Company, we, us and
our refer to Nabors Industries Ltd. or, for
information pertaining to periods prior to June 24, 2002,
to Nabors Industries, Inc. Where the context requires, such
references also include our subsidiaries.
Annual
General Meeting Information
Date and location of the annual general
meeting. We will hold the annual general meeting
at the Wyndham Greenspoint Hotel, 12400 Greenspoint Drive,
Houston, Texas at 11:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, on
Tuesday, June 6, 2006 unless adjourned or postponed.
Admission to the annual general meeting. Only
record or beneficial owners of Nabors common shares may attend
the annual general meeting in person. If you are a shareholder
of record, you may be asked to present proof of identification,
such as a drivers license. Beneficial owners must also
present evidence of share ownership, such as a recent brokerage
account or bank statement.
Voting
Information
Stock Split. On December 13, 2005, the
Company declared a
two-for-one
stock split of the Common Shares in the form of a
100 percent stock dividend, payable April 17, 2006 to
holders of record at the close of business on March 31,
2006 (the Stock Split). All share amounts with
respect to the Common Shares in this Proxy Statement are as of
the record date for the annual general meeting (April 7,
2006) and have not been adjusted to give effect to
the Stock Split, unless otherwise noted.
Record date and quorum. The record date for
the annual general meeting is April 7, 2006. You may vote
all common shares of Nabors that you owned as of the close of
business on that date. Each common share entitles you to one
vote on each matter to be voted on at the annual general
meeting. On the record date, 155,039,187 common shares of
Nabors were outstanding. In addition, the holder of record of
one Special Voting Preferred Share of Nabors is entitled to a
number of votes equal to the number of exchangeable shares of
Nabors Exchangeco (Canada), Inc., a corporation incorporated
under the laws of Canada, in accordance with the instructions
received from the holders of such shares. There were
93,880 exchangeable shares of Nabors Exchangeco (Canada)
Inc. outstanding on the record date. A majority of the shares
outstanding on the record date, present in person or by proxy,
constitutes a quorum to transact business at the annual general
meeting. Abstentions and withheld votes will be counted for
purposes of establishing a quorum.
Submitting voting instructions for shares held in your
name. You may vote at the annual general meeting
by completing, signing and returning the enclosed proxy card. A
properly completed and submitted proxy will be voted in
accordance with your instructions, unless you subsequently
revoke your instructions. If you submit a signed proxy without
indicating your vote, the person voting the proxy will vote your
shares according to the Boards recommendation.
Submitting voting instructions for shares held in street
name. If you hold your shares through a broker,
follow the voting instructions you receive from your broker. If
you want to vote in person, you must obtain a legal proxy from
your broker and bring it to the annual general meeting. If you
do not submit voting instructions to your broker, your broker
may still be permitted to vote your shares. New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE) member brokers may vote your shares
under the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary items. The election of directors
and approval and appointment of Nabors independent
auditors are discretionary items under the rules of
the NYSE. Member brokers that do not receive instructions from
beneficial owners may vote on these proposals in their
discretion.
|
|
|
|
Non-discretionary items. The proposal to
approve the Amended and Restated 2003 Employee Stock Plan is a
non-discretionary item under the rules of the NYSE
and may not be voted on by member brokers, absent specific
voting instructions from beneficial owners.
|
If you do not submit voting instructions and your broker does
not have discretion to vote your shares on a matter
(broker non-votes), your shares will not be voted on
that matter at the annual general meeting. Accordingly, broker
non-votes will not be counted in determining the outcome of vote
on any matter at the annual general meeting. Broker non-votes
will, however, be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum.
Revoking your proxy. You may revoke your proxy
at any time before it is actually voted by (1) delivering a
written revocation notice prior to the annual general meeting to
Daniel McLachlin, Secretary, Nabors Industries Ltd., P.O.
Box HM3349, Hamilton, HMPX. Bermuda; (2) submitting a
later proxy; or (3) voting in person at the annual general
meeting (although attendance at the annual general meeting will
not, by itself, constitute a revocation of a proxy).
Votes required to elect directors and to adopt other
proposals. Directors are elected by a
plurality of the votes cast. The approval and appointment
of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, authorization for the Audit
Committee to set the auditors remuneration, and the
approval of the Amended and Restated 2003 Employee Stock Plan
each require the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of shares present in person or represented by
proxy and entitled to vote thereon.
Withholding your vote or voting to
abstain. You can withhold your vote
for any nominee for election for director. Withheld votes will
be excluded from the vote and will have no effect on the
outcome. On the other proposals, you can vote to
abstain. If you vote to abstain, your
shares will be counted as present at the annual general meeting
for purposes of that proposal and your vote will have the effect
of a vote against the proposal.
ITEM 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our Board proposes, based on the recommendation of the
Governance and Nominating Committee, the election of Eugene M.
Isenberg as a Class III director for a term ending at the
2009 annual general meeting. Mr. Isenberg is a current
director of Nabors. The nominee has indicated that he will serve
if elected. We do not anticipate that the nominee will be unable
or unwilling to stand for election,
2
but if that happens, your proxy will be voted for another person
nominated by the Board or the Board may opt to reduce the number
of directors.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE
ELECTION OF MR. ISENBERG AS A CLASS III DIRECTOR FOR A TERM
ENDING AT THE 2009 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING.
CLASS III
Nominee
for election for a three-year term ending in 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
Position with Nabors
|
|
of Nabors
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
and Prior Business
Experience
|
|
Since
|
|
Eugene M. Isenberg
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chairman of
the Executive Committee of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of Nabors since 1987. Mr. Isenberg served as a Director of
Danielson Holding Company (a financial services holding company)
until October 2004. He served as a Governor of the National
Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) from 1998 to 2006 and
the American Stock Exchange (AMEX) until 2005. He has served as
a member of the National Petroleum Council since 2000. From 1969
to 1982, Mr. Isenberg was Chairman of the Board and
principal shareholder of Genimar, Inc. (a steel trading and
building products manufacturing company), which was sold in
1982. From 1955 to 1968, Mr. Isenberg was employed in
various management capacities with Exxon Corporation.
|
|
|
1987
|
|
CLASS II
Directors
Continuing in Office Terms Expiring in
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
Position with Nabors
|
|
of Nabors
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
and Prior Business
Experience
|
|
Since
|
|
Anthony G. Petrello
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating
Officer of Nabors since 1992, Deputy Chairman since 2003, a
member of the Executive Committee of the Board since 1991 and a
member of the Technical and Safety Committee of the Board since
2003. From 1979 to 1991, Mr. Petrello was with the law firm
Baker & McKenzie, where he had been Managing Partner of
its New York Office from 1986 until his resignation in 1991.
Mr. Petrello holds a J.D. degree from Harvard Law School
and B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mathematics from Yale University.
|
|
|
1991
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
Position with Nabors
|
|
of Nabors
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
and Prior Business
Experience
|
|
Since
|
|
Myron M. Sheinfeld
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
Chairman of the Audit Committee of
the Board since 1988, a member of the Compensation Committee of
the Board since 1993 and a member of the Governance and
Nominating Committee of the Board since 2002. He is Senior
Counsel to the law firm Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer &
Feld, L.L.P. From 1970 until April 2001 he held various
positions in the law firm Sheinfeld, Maley & Kay P.C.
Mr. Sheinfeld was an adjunct professor of law at the
University of Texas, School of Law from 1975 to 1991, and is a
contributing author to numerous legal and business publications,
and a contributor, co-editor and co-author of Collier On
Bankruptcy, and a co-author of Collier On Bankruptcy
Tax for Lexis-Nexis and Matthew Bender & Co., Inc.
He is former President, a present Director and a member of The
Houston Chapter of National Association of Corporate Directors.
He is Chair of the ABA Standing Committee on Specialization.
|
|
|
1988
|
|
Martin J. Whitman
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
Mr. Whitman is the Lead Director
for the Companys Board of Directors. Member of the Audit
Committee of the Board since 1993; a member of the Governance
and Nominating Committee of the Board since 2002, a member of
the Executive Committee since 2005, and Chairman of the
Compensation Committee of the Board since 2006. Chief Executive
Officer until June 2002 and a Director of Danielson Holding
Corporation (a holding company for conversion of waste to
energy, and insurance businesses) until October 2004 (Chairman
of the Board until July 1999); Chairman and Trustee of Third
Avenue Trust since 1990 and Chief Executive Officer of Third
Avenue Trust from 1990 to 2003; Co-Chief Investment Officer of
Third Avenue Management LLC and its predecessor (the adviser to
Third Avenue Trust) since 2003 and Chief Investment Officer of
Third Avenue Management LLC and its predecessor from 1991 to
2003; Director of Tejon Ranch Co. (an agricultural and land
management company) from 1997 to 2001; and, Director of Stewart
Information Services Corp. (a title insurance and real estate
company) from 2000 until 2001. Mr. Whitman was an Adjunct
Lecturer, Adjunct Professor and Distinguished Fellow in Finance,
Yale University School of Management from 1972 to 1984 and 1992
to 1999 and is currently an Adjunct Lecturer in Finance at Yale
University and an Adjunct Professor in Finance at Syracuse
University. He was an Adjunct Professor at the Columbia
University Graduate School of Business in 2001. Mr. Whitman
is co-author of The Aggressive Conservative Investor and
author of Value Investing: A Balanced Approach.
|
|
|
1991
|
|
4
CLASS I
Directors
Continuing in Office Terms Expiring in
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
Position with Nabors
|
|
of Nabors
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
and Prior Business
Experience
|
|
Since
|
|
James L. Payne
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
Chairman of the Governance and
Nominating Committee of the Board since 2002, a member of the
Compensation Committee of the Board since 2006, and a member of
the Technical and Safety Committee of the Board since 1999.
Mr. Payne is currently Chairman and Chief Executive Office
of Shona Energy Company, LLC. Mr. Payne was Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and President of Nuevo Energy Company (a
company engaged in the acquisition, production and exploration
of oil and natural gas properties) until May 2004. He also
serves as a Director of BJ Services and Global Industries. He
was a Director of Pool Energy Services Co. from 1993 until its
acquisition by Nabors in November 1999. He retired as Vice
Chairman of Devon Corp. in February 2001. Prior to the merger
between Devon Corp. and Santa Fe Snyder Company in 2000, he
had served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Santa Fe Snyder Company. He was Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Santa Fe Energy Company from 1990 to
1999 when it merged with Snyder Oil Company. Mr. Payne is a
graduate of the Colorado School of Mines where he was named a
Distinguished Achievement Medalist in 1993. He holds an MBA
degree from Golden Gate University and has completed the
Stanford Executive Program.
|
|
|
1999
|
|
Hans W. Schmidt
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
Chairman of the Technical and
Safety Committee of the Board since 1998, a member of the
Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board since 2002, a
member of the Compensation Committee of the Board since 2005,
and a member of the Audit Committee of the Board since 2006.
From 1958 to his retirement in 1992, Mr. Schmidt held a
number of positions with C. Deilmann A.G., a diversified energy
company located in Bad Bentheim, Germany, including serving as a
Director from 1982 to 1992. From 1965 to 1992 he served as
Director of a subsidiary of C. Deilmann A.G., Deutag Drilling, a
company with worldwide drilling operations. From 1988 to 1991,
Mr. Schmidt served as President of Transocean Drilling
Company, a company of which he was also a Director from 1981
until 1991.
|
|
|
1993
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
Position with Nabors
|
|
of Nabors
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
and Prior Business
Experience
|
|
Since
|
|
Alexander M. Knaster
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Member of the Governance and
Nominating Committee of the Board since 2004 and a member of the
Compensation Committee of the Board since 2005. Mr. Knaster
currently serves as Chairman and CEO of Pamplona Capital
Management, an investment management firm with private equity
and fund of funds operations. Mr. Knaster also serves as
director of TNK-BP and several subsidiaries of Alfa Group
Holding Company which is one of Russias largest
conglomerates with interests in telecoms, banking, insurance and
the Russian oil and gas producing entity TNK-BP. From 1998 until
2004 Mr. Knaster was Chief Executive Officer of Alfa Bank.
During 2002 and 2003 he also served as General Director of
Sidanco, Russias seventh largest oil company. From 1995 to
1998 he served as President and CEO of Credit Suisse First
Boston (Moscow), responsible for the firms operations in
Russia and the CIS. Mr. Knaster has over 20 years
experience in the banking industry including several other major
investment banks. Mr. Knaster started his career as
engineer with Schlumberger, Ltd. working on offshore oil and gas
rigs in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Mr. Knaster holds a
PhD in economics from the Russian Academy of Science, an MBA
from Harvard Business School and a BS in Electrical Engineering
and Mathematics from Carnegie-Mellon University.
Mr. Knaster is also a Chartered Financial Analyst and a
member of International Society of Financial Analysts and
National Association of Petroleum Industry Analysts.
|
|
|
2004
|
|
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
The Board of Directors met four times during 2005. Each of our
incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of
the meetings of the Board and the committees on which he served
during 2005, except Mr. Hans Schmidt, who attended 43% of
the aggregate of the meetings of the Board and the committees on
which he served during 2005 and Mr. Whitman, who attended
71% of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board and the
committees on which he served during 2005. The Board has five
committees the Audit Committee, the
Compensation Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee,
the Technical and Safety Committee and the Executive Committee.
The independent directors of the Board meet in executive
sessions following each Board meeting. Appointments and
chairmanships of the committees are recommended by the
Governance and Nominating Committee and are selected by the
Board. All committees report their activities to the Board. The
charters of each of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee,
and Governance and Nominating Committee are available on our web
site at www.nabors.com.
The Board has affirmatively determined that each of the current
directors, with the exception of Messrs. Isenberg and
Petrello who are officers of the Company, has no material
relationship with Nabors that would interfere with the exercise
of independent judgment and, therefore, is independent
6
under the listing standards of the NYSE. Mr. Whitman is
serving as our Lead Director. In that role, his primary
responsibility is to preside over executive sessions of the
nonmanagement directors and to call meetings of the
nonmanagement directors as desirable. The Lead Director also
chairs certain portions of Board meetings, serves as liaison
between the Chairman of the Board and the nonmanagement
directors, and develops and approves, together with the
Chairman, the agenda for Board meetings. The Lead Director will
also perform other duties the Board delegates from time to time
to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities.
Audit
Committee
The primary purpose of our Audit Committee is to assist the
Board in monitoring (a) the quality and integrity of the
financial statements of the Company; (b) the independent
auditors qualifications and independence; (c) the
performance of the Companys independent auditors; and
(d) compliance by the Company with legal and regulatory
requirements. The Audit Committee met four times during 2005.
The members of the Audit Committee for fiscal 2005 were Myron M.
Sheinfeld (Chairman), James C. Flores and Martin J. Whitman. The
Board determined that the Audit Committees composition
satisfied the rules of the NYSE that govern audit committee
composition, including the requirement that each member of the
Audit Committee be independent as that term is
defined under the listing standards of the NYSE and specified in
Rule 10A-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In addition, the
Board has determined that Mr. Whitman is an audit
committee financial expert as defined under the current
rules of the SEC. As of the date of this proxy statement, the
current members of the Audit Committee are Myron M. Sheinfeld
(Chairman), Martin J. Whitman, and Hans Schmidt. The Board has
determined that the Audit Committees current composition
satisfies the rules of the NYSE that govern audit committee
composition, including the requirement that each member of the
Audit Committee be independent as that term is
defined under the listing standards of the NYSE and specified in
Rule 10A-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Compensation
Committee
The primary purposes of our Compensation Committee are to:
(a) assist the Board in discharging its responsibilities
relating to the compensation of our executives, including
overseeing the administration of our compensation programs and
setting the compensation of our key executives; (b) assist
the Board in its oversight of the development, implementation,
and effectiveness of our policies and strategies relating to our
human capital function; and (c) prepare any report on
executive compensation required by the rules and regulations of
the SEC. The Compensation Committee met four times during 2005.
The members of the Compensation Committee for 2005 were James C.
Flores (Chairman), Myron M. Sheinfeld, Hans Schmidt, Martin J.
Whitman (beginning May 6, 2005), and Alex Knaster
(beginning May 6, 2005), each of whom was, as determined by
the Board, an independent director as defined under NYSE listing
standards. As of the date of this proxy statement, the members
of the Compensation Committee are Martin J. Whitman (Chairman),
James L. Payne, Alexander M. Knaster, Hans W. Schmidt, and Myron
M. Sheinfeld, each of whom is, as determined by the Board, an
independent director as defined under NYSE listing standards.
Governance
and Nominating Committee
The primary purpose of the Governance and Nominating Committee
is to recommend individuals to the Board of Directors for
nomination, election or appointment as members of the Board and
its committees and to take a leadership role in shaping our
corporate governance, including developing, recommending to the
Board and reviewing on an ongoing basis our corporate governance
principles and practices. The Governance and Nominating
Committee met four times during 2005. The members of the
Governance and Nominating Committee for 2005 were James L. Payne
(Chairman), James C. Flores, Hans W. Schmidt, Myron M.
Sheinfeld, Martin J. Whitman, and Alexander M.
7
Knaster, each of whom was, as determined by the Board, an
independent director as defined under NYSE listing standards. As
of the date of this proxy statement, the members of the
Governance and Nominating Committee are James L. Payne
(Chairman), Alexander M. Knaster, Hans W. Schmidt, Myron M.
Sheinfeld, and Martin J. Whitman, each of whom is, as determined
by the Board, an independent director as defined under NYSE
listing standards.
Shareholder Recommendations for Directors. The
Governance and Nominating Committee will consider director
candidates recommended by shareholders. The Governance and
Nominating Committee does not set specific, minimum
qualifications that nominees must meet in order for the
Committee to recommend them to the Board of Directors, but
rather believes that each nominee should be evaluated based upon
his or her individual merits, taking into account the needs of
the Company and the composition of the Board of Directors. Of
course, directors should possess the highest personal and
professional ethics, integrity and values, be committed to the
long-term interests of the shareholders, and be willing to
devote sufficient time to carry out their duties and
responsibilities effectively. Members of the Governance and
Nominating Committee discuss and evaluate possible candidates in
detail, and suggest individuals to explore in more depth. The
Committee has the authority to engage consultants. Once a
candidate is identified whom the Committee wishes to consider
seriously and move toward nomination, the Chair of the Committee
and the Chief Executive Officer enter into discussions with that
candidate. The policy adopted by the Committee provides that
candidates recommended by shareholders are given appropriate
consideration in the same manner as other candidates.
Shareholders who wish to submit candidates for director for
consideration by the Governance and Nominating Committee for
election at our 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders may do so by
submitting in writing such candidates names, together with the
information described on our web site at www.nabors.com, to
Board of Directors, Nabors Industries Ltd., P.O.
Box HM3349, Hamilton, HMPX, Bermuda, prior to
January 11, 2007.
Technical
and Safety Committee
The Technical and Safety Committee provides leadership in
developing policies, implementing programs and monitoring
performance in the technical and safety aspects of Nabors
operations. The Technical and Safety Committee met two times
during 2005. The members of the Technical and Safety Committee
are Hans W. Schmidt (Chairman), James L. Payne and Anthony G.
Petrello.
Executive
Committee
The Executive Committee has the authority to exercise all
powers, rights and authority of the Board as might be necessary
from time to time between regularly scheduled Board meetings,
except with respect to certain actions as provided in
Nabors Bye-Laws or applicable law. The members of the
Executive Committee are Eugene M. Isenberg (Chairman), Anthony
G. Petrello and Martin J. Whitman. The Executive Committee did
not meet during 2005.
CODE OF
ETHICS
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct that satisfies the
SECs definition of a Code of Ethics and
applies to all employees, including our principal executive
officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting
officer. The Code of Business Conduct is posted on our website
at www.nabors.com. We intend to disclose on our website any
amendments to the Code of Conduct and any waivers of the Code of
Conduct that apply to our principal executive officer, principal
financial officer, and principal accounting officer.
8
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
Nabors compensates its directors through a combination of an
annual retainer and stock incentive awards. During 2005 each
director received an annual retainer of $50,000; the Chairman of
each committee received an additional retainer of $10,000
(except the Chairman of the Audit Committee, who received
$25,000), and the Lead Director received an annual retainer of
$10,000 for service in this capacity. No additional amounts are
paid for attendance at Board or committee meetings. Beginning in
2006 the Chairman of each committee will receive a retainer of
$50,000 (except the Chairman of the Audit Committee, who will
receive a $100,000 retainer).
Nabors also issues equity incentives to its nonemployee
directors to align their interests with Nabors
shareholders. Awards are made pursuant to equity incentive plans
adopted from time to time for nonemployee directors. On
June 6, 2005, each nonemployee director was awarded a
restricted stock grant of 10,000 common shares (pre-split). On
the date of the award, the fair market value of a share of
common share of NIL was $56.87. The period of restriction
commenced on February 24, 2005 and the award generally
vests in three equal annual installments beginning on the first
anniversary of grant. The Board agreed in 2006 to reduce the
equity component of nonemployee director compensation to an
annual award of 7,500 shares (pre-split).
SHARE
OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth, as of April 7, 2006,
certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of
Nabors outstanding common shares by (a) each current
director and nominee, (b) each executive officer named in
the Summary Compensation Table appearing elsewhere herein (the
Named Executive Officers), (c) all directors
and executive officers as a group, and (d) any other person
or entity known by Nabors to be the beneficial owner of more
than 5% of Nabors common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares Beneficially
Owned
|
|
Beneficial
Owner(1)
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Percent of
Total(2)
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eugene M.
Isenberg(2)(3)
|
|
|
10,589,772
|
|
|
|
6.47
|
%
|
Alexander M.
Knaster(2)
|
|
|
127,500
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
James L.
Payne(2)
|
|
|
94,050
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Anthony G.
Petrello(2)(3)
|
|
|
5,274,670
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
%
|
Hans W.
Schmidt(2)
|
|
|
198,416
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Myron M.
Sheinfeld(2)(4)
|
|
|
167,134
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Martin J.
Whitman(2)(5)
|
|
|
283,184
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Other Executive
Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce P.
Koch(2)
|
|
|
64,876
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Daniel
McLachlin(2)
|
|
|
5,916
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Directors/Executive Officers
as a group
(9 persons)(2)-(5)
|
|
|
16,805,518
|
|
|
|
9.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AXA Financial
Inc.(6)
|
|
|
22,828,932
|
|
|
|
14.72
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% |
|
(1) |
|
The address of each of the directors and officers listed is in
care of Nabors Industries Ltd., P.O. Box HM3349, Hamilton,
HMPX, Bermuda. |
9
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As of April 7, 2006, Nabors had 155,039,187 shares
outstanding and entitled to vote. For purposes of this table,
beneficial ownership is determined in accordance
with
Rule 13d-3
under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, pursuant to
which a person or group of persons is deemed to have
beneficial ownership of any common shares that such
person has the right to acquire within 60 days. We have
included in the table common shares underlying fully vested
stock options (without giving effect to accelerated vesting that
might occur in certain circumstances). For purposes of computing
the percentage of outstanding common shares held by each person
or group of persons named above, any shares which such person or
persons has the right to acquire within 60 days (as well as
common shares underlying fully vested stock options) are deemed
to be outstanding, but are not deemed to be outstanding for
purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other
person. |
|
|
|
The number of common shares underlying fully vested stock
options included in the table are as follows:
Mr. Isenberg 8,715,504;
Mr. Payne 72,500;
Mr. Petrello 5,073,658;
Mr. Schmidt 178,166;
Mr. Sheinfeld 132,499;
Mr. Whitman 157,499;
Mr. Koch 61,250;
Mr. McLachlin 5,500, and all directors and
Named Executive Officers as a group 14,396,576. |
|
(3) |
|
The shares listed for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello are
held directly or indirectly through certain trusts, defined
benefit plans and individual retirement accounts of which each
is a grantor, trustee or beneficiary. Not included in the table
are 386 shares owned directly or held in trust by
Mr. Isenbergs spouse. |
|
(4) |
|
The shares listed for Mr. Sheinfeld include 292 shares
owned directly by Mr. Sheinfelds spouse.
Mr. Sheinfeld disclaims beneficial ownership of these
shares. |
|
(5) |
|
The shares listed for Mr. Whitman include 96,519 common
shares owned by M.J. Whitman & Co., Inc. Because
Mr. Whitman is a majority stockholder in M.J.
Whitman & Co., Inc., he may be deemed to have
beneficial ownership of the Nabors shares owned by that company. |
|
(6) |
|
Based solely on the information contained in Schedule 13G
of AXA Financial, Inc. and certain of its affiliates filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 15,
2006, the shares listed include (i) 25,555,944 shares
beneficially owned by Alliance Capital Management L.P.,
(ii) 175,440 shares beneficially owned by AXA
Equitable Life Insurance Company, (iii) 158,770 shares
beneficially owned by AXA Rosenberg Investment Management LLC.
AXA Financial, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to
18,078,349 shares and sole dispositive power with respect
to 25,886,724 shares. The address of AXA Financial,
Inc.s principal business office is 1290 Avenue of the
Americas, New York, NY 10104. |
10
Other
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position with Nabors
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
and Prior Business
Experience
|
|
Bruce P. Koch
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer since February 2003, Vice President-Finance from January
1996 to February 2003, and Corporate Controller of Nabors from
March 1990 to 1995. He was employed with the accounting firm of
Coopers & Lybrand from 1983 to 1990 in a number of
capacities, including Audit Manager from 1987 until 1990.
|
Daniel McLachlin
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Vice
President Administration and Secretary of
Nabors since 1986. He was Manager, Administration of Nabors from
1984 to 1986. From 1979 to 1984 he was the Vice President, Human
Resources of Nabors Drilling Limited, a subsidiary of Nabors.
|
MANAGEMENT
COMPENSATION
Summary
Compensation Table
The table below sets forth all reportable compensation awarded
to, earned by or paid to the Named Executive Officers for
services rendered in all capacities to Nabors and its
subsidiaries and whose compensation for the year exceed $100,000
for each of the last three fiscal years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Compensation
|
Annual Compensation
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
Restricted
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
Stock
|
|
Underlying
|
|
All Other
|
Name and Principal
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Award(s)
|
|
Options/
|
|
Compensation
|
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
SARs
|
|
($)
|
|
Eugene M. Isenberg
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
825,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
287,661
|
(4)
|
|
|
5,765,000
|
|
|
|
1,683,333
|
|
|
|
244,973
|
(5)
|
Chairman of the Board,
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
825,000
|
|
|
|
2,200,000
|
|
|
|
208,267
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
950,000
|
|
|
|
170,432
|
|
Director and Chief
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
|
|
231,569
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
950,000
|
|
|
|
248,419
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony G. Petrello
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
223,832
|
(8)
|
|
|
2,882,500
|
|
|
|
841,667
|
|
|
|
202,086
|
(9)
|
Director, Deputy
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
|
100,437
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
475,000
|
|
|
|
214,125
|
|
Chairman, President
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
85,566
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
475,000
|
|
|
|
80,684
|
|
and Chief Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce P. Koch
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,739
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
8,400
|
(10)
|
Vice President and
Chief
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
Financial Officer
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
7,400
|
|
Daniel McLachlin
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
54,159
|
(11)
|
|
|
18,736
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
3,578
|
(12)
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
57,867
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
3,248
|
|
Administration and
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
99,333
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
46,089
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the grant date value of Nabors restricted stock
awarded to the named executive officers on February 24,
2005 for performance during 2004, based on the closing price of
Nabors common shares on said date of $57.65 per share. The
total number of restricted shares held, and their aggregate
value as of December 30, 2005, were as follows:
Mr. Isenberg |
11
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 shares valued at $7,575,000,
Mr. Petrello 50,000 shares valued at
$3,787,500, Mr. Koch 1,626 shares
valued at $123,170, and
Mr. McLachlin 325 shares valued at
$24,619. Each of the Named Executive Officers also received the
number of restricted shares indicated below, effective
February 28, 2006 for performance during 2005. On
February 28, 2006, the fair market value of a common share
of Nabors was $65.95. The restricted stock awards vest in three
equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of
the date of the grant for Mr. Isenberg and
Mr. Petrello and four equal annual installments beginning
on the first anniversary of the date of the grant for
Mr. Koch: Mr. Isenberg 100,000,
Mr. Petrello 50,000, and
Mr. Koch 2,000. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes $50,000 paid as directors fees. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Isenberg is entitled to receive an annual cash bonus as
provided in his employment agreement. For each of fiscal years
2005, 2004, and 2003, Mr. Isenberg agreed to accept a cash
bonus that was less than the cash bonus he was entitled to
receive under his employment agreement. See
below Employment Contracts. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes various club dues ($55,285); auto allowance, including
tax gross-up
($37,766); imputed life insurance ($14,642); tax preparation
fees, including tax
gross-up
($118,020); and personal use of corporate aircraft, including
tax gross-up
($61,948). |
|
(5) |
|
Includes (a) Nabors matching contributions to a
retirement savings plan and a non-qualified deferred
compensation plan of $8,400; and (b) $236,573 that is the
net benefit to Mr. Isenberg of the premiums paid by Nabors,
as projected on an actuarial basis, for a split dollar life
insurance arrangement (Nabors has suspended additional premium
payments under these policies as a result of the adoption of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). |
|
(6) |
|
Includes $50,000 paid as directors fees. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Petrello is entitled to receive an annual cash bonus as
provided in his employment agreement. For each of fiscal years
2005 and 2004, Mr. Petrello agreed to accept a cash bonus
that was less than the cash bonus he was entitled to receive
under his employment agreement. See
below Employment Contracts. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes club dues ($18,906); auto allowance, including tax
gross-up
($37,822); imputed life insurance ($3,864); tax
gross-up on
move ($36,755); and personal use of corporate aircraft,
including tax
gross-up
($126,485). |
|
(9) |
|
Includes (a) Nabors matching contributions to a
retirement savings plan and a non-qualified deferred
compensation plan of $8,400; (b) $92,847.00 that is the net
benefit to Mr. Petrello of the premiums paid by Nabors, as
projected on an actuarial basis, for a split dollar life
insurance arrangement (Nabors has suspended additional premium
payments under these policies as a result of the adoption of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002); and (c) imputed interest of
$100,839 on a loan from Nabors in the maximum amount of
$2,881,915 pursuant to his employment agreement in connection
with his relocation to Houston, the balance of which was
$2,881,915 as of March 31, 2006, and on which no interest
has been paid or charged thereon. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes Nabors matching contributions to a retirement
savings plan and a non-qualified deferred compensation plan of
$8,400. |
|
(11) |
|
Includes club dues; imputed life insurance; foreign service
premium; goods & services differential ($27,089);
Company reimbursement of moving expenses in connection with a
relocation to Bermuda; and a hardship allowance. |
|
(12) |
|
Includes Nabors matching contributions to a retirement
savings plan and a nonqualified deferred compensation plan of
$3,578. |
12
Stock
Option/SAR Grant Table
The following table provides information with respect to stock
options granted during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005 to the Named Executive Officers. Nabors did not grant any
stock appreciation rights to the Named Executive Officers during
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Granted to
|
|
|
or Base
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Name
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
in Fiscal Year
|
|
|
($/Sh)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
($)(4)
|
|
|
Eugene M. Isenberg
|
|
|
350,000(1
|
)
|
|
|
9.55
|
%
|
|
|
57.65
|
|
|
|
02/24/2015
|
|
|
|
5,636,610
|
|
Eugene M. Isenberg
|
|
|
1,333,333(2
|
)
|
|
|
36.37
|
%
|
|
|
71.61
|
|
|
|
12/05/2015
|
|
|
|
29,879,193
|
|
Anthony G. Petrello
|
|
|
175,000(1
|
)
|
|
|
4.77
|
%
|
|
|
57.65
|
|
|
|
02/24/2015
|
|
|
|
2,818,305
|
|
Anthony G. Petrello
|
|
|
666,667(2
|
)
|
|
|
18.18
|
%
|
|
|
71.61
|
|
|
|
12/05/2015
|
|
|
|
14,939,607
|
|
Bruce P. Koch
|
|
|
5,000(1
|
)
|
|
|
.14
|
%
|
|
|
57.65
|
|
|
|
02/24/2015
|
|
|
|
53,362
|
|
Bruce P. Koch
|
|
|
5,000(3
|
)
|
|
|
.14
|
%
|
|
|
62.10
|
|
|
|
07/08/2015
|
|
|
|
59,886
|
|
Daniel McLachlin
|
|
|
1,000(1
|
)
|
|
|
.03
|
%
|
|
|
57.65
|
|
|
|
02/24/2015
|
|
|
|
10,672
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The options were granted on February 24, 2005 and were
fully vested on June 1, 2005.
|
|
(2)
|
The options were granted on December 5, 2005 and were fully
vested on December 30, 2005.
|
|
(3)
|
The options were granted on July 8, 2005 and were fully
vested on December 31, 2005.
|
|
(4)
|
All options are granted at an exercise price equal to the
closing price of Nabors common shares on the date of
grant. Therefore, if there is no appreciation in the market
value, no value will be realizable. In accordance with
Securities and Exchange Commission rules, the Black-Scholes
option pricing model was chosen to estimate the grant date
present value of the options set forth in this table.
Nabors use of this model should not be construed as an
endorsement of its accuracy at valuing options. All stock option
valuation models, including the Black-Scholes model, require a
prediction about the future movement of the stock price. The
following assumptions were made for purposes of estimating the
fair value of each option grant: (a) for options granted to
Mr. Isenberg and Mr. Petrello on February 24,
2005 an expected term of 4 years, volatility of 27.5% and a
risk-free rate of return of 3.801%; (b) for options granted
to Mr. Koch and Mr. McLachlin on February 24,
2005 an expected term of 2 years, volatility of 27.5% and a
risk-free rate of return of 3.498%; (c) for options granted
on July 8, 2005 an expected term of 2 years,
volatility of 28.5% and a risk-free rate of return of 3.77%; and
(d) for options granted December 5, 2005 an expected
term of 4 years, volatility of 30.75% and a risk-free rate
of return of 4.49%. The figures given are not intended to
forecast future price appreciation of the shares. The real value
of the options in this table depends solely upon the actual
performance of the Nabors shares during the applicable
period.
|
Option
Exercises During 2005 and Year-End Option Values
The following table provides information with respect to stock
options exercised during 2005 and the value as of
December 30, 2005 of unexercised
in-the-money
options held by the Named Executive Officers. The value realized
on the exercise of options is calculated using the difference
between the per share option exercise price and the market value
of a share on the date of the exercise. The value of
13
unexercised
in-the-money
options at fiscal year end is calculated using the difference
between the per share option exercise price and the market value
of $75.75 per share at December 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
Value of Unexercised
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised
|
|
|
In-the-Money
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Options at
|
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
at Fiscal Year-End
|
|
|
Fiscal Year-End ($)
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable
|
|
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable
|
|
|
Eugene M. Isenberg
|
|
|
4,846,240
|
|
|
|
193,308,763
|
|
|
|
8,082,170/950,002
|
|
|
|
242,977,387/30,615,403
|
|
Anthony G. Petrello
|
|
|
1,869,923
|
|
|
|
81,616,986
|
|
|
|
4,756,991/475,001
|
|
|
|
159,036,806/15,307,701
|
|
Bruce P. Koch
|
|
|
82,850
|
|
|
|
3,059,025
|
|
|
|
37,500/43,750
|
|
|
|
1,137,300/1,414,025
|
|
Daniel McLachlin
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,125/6,625
|
|
|
|
51,670/235,585
|
|
Employment
Contracts
Nabors Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Eugene M.
Isenberg, and its Deputy Chairman, President and Chief Operating
Officer, Anthony G. Petrello, have employment agreements which
were amended and restated effective October 1, 1996 and
which currently are due to expire on September 30, 2010.
Mr. Isenbergs employment agreement was originally
negotiated with a creditors committee in 1987 in
connection with the reorganization proceedings of Anglo Energy,
Inc., which subsequently changed its name to Nabors. These
contractual arrangements subsequently were approved by the
various constituencies in those reorganization proceedings,
including equity and debt holders, and confirmed by the United
States Bankruptcy Court.
Mr. Petrellos employment agreement was first entered
into effective October 1, 1991. Mr. Petrellos
employment agreement was agreed upon as part of arms
length negotiations with the Board before he joined Nabors in
October 1991, and was reviewed and approved by the Compensation
Committee of the Board and the full Board of Directors at that
time.
The employment agreements for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello
were amended in 1994 and 1996. These amendments were approved by
the Compensation Committee of the Board and the full Board of
Directors at that time.
The employment agreements provide for an initial term of five
years with an evergreen provision which automatically extended
the agreement for an additional one-year term on each
anniversary date, unless Nabors provided notice to the contrary
ten days prior to such anniversary. The Board of Directors in
March 2006 exercised its election to fix the expiration date of
the employment agreements for Messrs. Isenberg and
Petrello, and accordingly these agreements will expire at the
end of their current term at September 30, 2010.
In addition to a base salary, the employment agreements provide
for annual cash bonuses in an amount equal to 6% and 2%, for
Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello, respectively, of
Nabors net cash flow (as defined in the respective
employment agreements) in excess of 15% of the average
shareholders equity for each fiscal year.
(Mr. Isenbergs cash bonus formula originally was set
at 10% in excess of a 10% return on shareholders equity
and he has voluntarily reduced it over time to its 6% in excess
of 15% level.) Mr. Petrellos bonus is subject to a
minimum of $700,000 per year. In 15 of the last
16 years, Mr. Isenberg has agreed voluntarily to
accept a lower annual cash bonus (i.e., a cash amount lower than
the cash amount provided for under his employment agreement) in
light of his overall compensation package. Mr. Petrello has
agreed voluntarily to accept a lower annual cash bonus (i.e., a
cash amount lower than the cash amount provided for under his
employment agreement) in light of his overall compensation
package in 13 of the last 15 years. For 2005 the annual
cash bonuses for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello pursuant to
the formula described in their employment agreements were
$41.2 million and $13.7 million, respectively; but in
light of their overall compensation package
14
(including significant stock option grants and restricted stock
awards), they agreed to accept cash bonuses in the amounts of
$3 million and $1.5 million, respectively. There can
be no assurance that Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello will
agree in the future to accept annual cash bonuses in an amount
less than the cash amounts provided for in their agreements.
Mr. Isenberg voluntarily agreed to amend his employment
agreement in March 2006 (the 2006 Amendment). Under
the 2006 Amendment, Mr. Isenberg agreed to reduce the
annual cash bonus to an amount equal to 3% of Nabors net
cash flow (as defined in his employment agreement) in excess of
15% of the average shareholders equity for 2006. For 2007
through the expiration date of the employment agreement, the
annual cash bonus will return to 6% of Nabors net cash
flow (as defined in his employment agreement) in excess of 15%
of the average shareholders equity for each fiscal year.
Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello also are eligible for awards
under Nabors equity plans and may participate in annual
long-term incentive programs and pension and welfare plans, on
the same basis as other executives; and may receive special
bonuses from time to time as determined by the Board.
In the event that either Mr. Isenbergs or
Mr. Petrellos employment agreement is terminated
(i) upon death or disability (as defined in the respective
employment agreements), (ii) by Nabors prior to the
expiration date of the employment agreement for any reason other
than for Cause (as defined in the respective employment
agreements) or (iii) by either individual for Constructive
Termination Without Cause (as defined in the respective
employment agreements), each would be entitled to receive within
30 days of the triggering event (a) all base salary
which would have been payable through the expiration date of the
contract or three times his then current base salary, whichever
is greater; plus (b) the greater of (i) all annual
cash bonuses which would have been payable through the
expiration date; (ii) three times the highest bonus
(including the imputed value of grants of stock awards and stock
options), paid during the last three fiscal years prior to
termination; or (iii) three times the highest annual cash
bonus payable for each of the three previous fiscal years,
regardless of whether the amount was paid. In computing any
amount due under (b)(i) and (iii) above, the calculation is
made without regard to the 2006 Amendment reducing
Mr. Isenbergs bonus percentage as described above.
If, by way of example, these provisions had applied at
March 13, 2006, Mr. Isenberg would have been entitled
to a payment of approximately $204 million, subject to a
true up equal to the amount of cash bonus he would
have earned under the formula during the remaining term of the
agreement, based upon actual results, but would not be less than
approximately $204 million. Similarly, with respect to
Mr. Petrello, had these provisions applied at
March 13, 2006, Mr. Petrello would have been entitled
to a payment of approximately $104 million, subject to a
true up equal to the amount of cash bonus he would
have earned under the formula during the remaining term of the
agreement, based upon actual results, but would not be less than
approximately $104 million. These payment amounts are based
on historical data and are not intended to be estimates of
future payments required under the agreements. Depending upon
future operating results, the
true-up
could result in the payment of amounts which are significantly
higher. In addition, the affected individual is entitled to
receive (a) any unvested restricted stock outstanding,
which shall immediately and fully vest; (b) any unvested
outstanding stock options, which shall immediately and fully
vest; (c) any amounts earned, accrued or owing to the
executive but not yet paid (including executive benefits, life
insurance, disability benefits and reimbursement of expenses and
perquisites), which shall be continued through the later of the
expiration date or three years after the termination date;
(d) continued participation in medical, dental and life
insurance coverage until the executive receives equivalent
benefits or coverage through a subsequent employer or until the
death of the executive or his spouse, whichever is later; and
(e) any other or additional benefits in accordance with
applicable plans and programs of Nabors. For Mr. Isenberg,
as of March 13, 2006, the value of unvested restricted
stock was approximately $10.9 million and the value of
in-the-money
unvested stock options was approximately $6.2 million. For
Mr. Petrello, as of March 13, 2006, the value of
unvested restricted stock was approximately $5.5 million
and the value of
in-the-money
unvested stock
15
options was approximately $3.1 million. Estimates of the
cash value of Nabors obligations to Messrs. Isenberg
and Petrello under (c), (d) and (e) above are included
in the payment amounts above.
In the event that Messrs. Isenbergs or
Petrellos termination of employment is related to a Change
in Control (as defined in their respective employment
agreements), they would be entitled to receive a cash amount
equal to the greater of (a) one dollar less than the amount
that would constitute an excess parachute payment as
defined in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, or
(b) the cash amount that would be due in the event of a
termination without cause, as described above. If, by way of
example, there was a change of control event that applied on
March 13, 2006, then the payments to Messrs. Isenberg
and Petrello would be approximately $204 million and
$104 million, respectively. These payment amounts are based
on historical data and are not intended to be estimates of
future payments required under the agreements. Depending upon
future operating results, the
true-up
could result in the payment of amounts which are significantly
higher. In addition, they would receive (a) any unvested
restricted stock outstanding, which shall immediately and fully
vest; (b) any unvested outstanding stock options, which
shall immediately and fully vest; (c) any amounts earned,
accrued or owing to the executive but not yet paid (including
executive benefits, life insurance, disability benefits and
reimbursement of expenses and perquisites), which shall be
continued through the later of the expiration date or three
years after the termination date; (d) continued
participation in medical, dental and life insurance coverage
until the executive receives equivalent benefits or coverage
through a subsequent employer or until the death of the
executive or his spouse, whichever is later; and (e) any
other or additional benefits in accordance with applicable plans
and programs of Nabors. For Mr. Isenberg, as of
March 13, 2006, the value of unvested restricted stock was
approximately $10.9 million and the value of
in-the-money
unvested stock options was approximately $6.2 million. For
Mr. Petrello, as of March 13, 2006, the value of
unvested restricted stock was approximately $5.5 million
and the value of
in-the-money
unvested stock options was approximately $3.1 million. The
cash value of Nabors obligations to Messrs. Isenberg
and Petrello under (c), (d) and (e) above are included
in the payment amounts above. Also, they would receive
additional stock options immediately exercisable for
5 years to acquire a number of shares of common stock equal
to the highest number of options granted during any fiscal year
in the previous three fiscal years, at an option exercise price
equal to the average closing price during the 20 trading days
prior to the event which resulted in the change of control. If,
by way of example, there was a change of control event that
applied at March 13, 2006, Mr. Isenberg would have
received 1,683,333 options valued at approximately
$41 million and Mr. Petrello would have received
841,666 options valued at approximately $20 million, in
each case based upon a Black Scholes analysis. Finally, in the
event that an excise tax were applicable, they would receive a
gross-up
payment to make them whole with respect to any excise taxes
imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. With
respect to the preceding sentence, by way of example, if there
was a change of control event that applied on March 13,
2006, and assuming that the excise tax were applicable to the
transaction, then the additional payments to
Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello for the
gross-up
would be up to approximately $92 million and
$49 million, respectively.
In addition to salary and bonus, each of Mr. Isenberg and
Mr. Petrello receive group life insurance at an amount at
least equal to three times their respective base salaries;
various split-dollar life insurance policies, reimbursement of
expenses, various perquisites and a personal umbrella policy in
the amount of $5 million. Premiums payable under the split
dollar life insurance policies have been suspended as a result
of the adoption of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
This section discusses certain direct and indirect relationships
and transactions involving Nabors and any director or Named
Executive Officer.
16
Mr. Petrello has a loan from Nabors in the maximum amount
of $2,881,915 pursuant to his employment agreement in connection
with his relocation to Houston, the balance of which was
$2,881,915 as of December 31, 2005. The repayment of the
loan was automatically extended for an additional year on each
anniversary of his employment agreement. In September 2002
Mr. Petrello signed a waiver discontinuing the automatic
extensions of the loan repayment. The loan is scheduled to be
paid on or before September 30, 2006 and shall not be
further extended.
Mr. Payne is chairman and chief executive officer of, and
owns greater than a ten percent (10%) interest in, Shona Energy
Company, LLC (Shona). A subsidiary of Shona and a
subsidiary of the Company are parties to a series of agreements
pursuant to which they, along with a Peruvian company, obtained
a license to explore for hydrocarbons in Peru. The only payments
made between the Company and Shona are certain reimbursements by
the Company to Shona representing Nabors Subsidiarys
proportionate share of expenditures advanced by Shona in
connection with the parties joint participation in the
license contract. During 2005 the total amount reimbursed to
Shona was approximately $20,300. The Company also has guaranteed
Shonas initial minimum work obligations under the license
agreement. Shona, in turn, has undertaken to reimburse the
Company any amounts paid on Shonas behalf pursuant to the
guarantee. The Board of Directors has determined that this
transaction does not compromise Mr. Paynes
independence as a director.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The Compensation Committee for 2005 was comprised of James C.
Flores (Chairman), Myron M. Sheinfeld, Hans Schmidt, Martin J.
Whitman (beginning May 6, 2005), and Alexander M. Knaster
(beginning May 6, 2005), all independent directors. As of
the date of this proxy statement, the members of the
Compensation Committee are Martin J. Whitman (Chairman), James
L. Payne, Alexander M. Knaster, Hans W. Schmidt, and Myron M.
Sheinfeld, all independent directors. None of these directors
has ever served as an officer or employee of Nabors or any of
its subsidiaries, nor has any participated in any transaction
during the last fiscal year required to be disclosed pursuant to
the federal proxy rules. No executive officer of Nabors serves
on any compensation committee of the board of directors of any
entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as
a member of our Compensation Committee. In addition, none of our
executive officers serves as a member of the compensation
committee of the board of directors of any entity that has one
or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our
Board of Directors.
REPORT OF
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation
and Role of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee (the Committee) of the
Company is composed entirely of independent directors within the
meaning of the NYSE listing rules and the standards for director
independence adopted by the Board of Directors. The Committee is
responsible for overseeing the administration of our
compensation programs and setting the compensation of our key
executives. The Committee operates pursuant to a written charter
adopted by the Board of Directors, which is available in the
Investor Relations section of our website at www.nabors.com. We
discuss below our policies for compensating our executives and
aligning the interests of management with the long-term
interests of shareholders.
Compensation
Policies
The Committees goal is to incentivize and reward superior
executive performance that will create long-term investor value
and to attract and retain executives who deliver that level of
performance. The Committee supports a practice of paying base
salaries that approximate the median of the
17
competitive market, and bonuses and long-term incentives which
deliver above average compensation if financial results
and/or
shareholder returns exceed the results obtained by peer
companies. On an annual basis, the Committee will review a tally
sheet setting forth the base salary, annual bonus, long-term
incentives awarded, perquisites and other benefits for the Chief
Executive Officer and each Named Executive Officer as compared
to a peer group of companies.
To assist the Committee with its responsibilities, it is
regularly provided with briefing materials and is authorized to
retain, and has retained from time to time, nationally
recognized independent compensation consultants who report
directly to the Committee to provide expertise regarding
competitive compensation practices, peer analysis and advice to
the Committee. The Committee reports to the Board of Directors
on its actions and recommendations following every meeting and
regularly meets in executive session without members of
management present.
The Committee is mindful that the oil field services industry,
particularly the contract drilling segment, historically has
been volatile but currently is in a period of rapid expansion.
The ability of the Company to compete in this market place
depends in part on its ability to attract and retain executives
with the necessary industry knowledge and management and
financial skills to preserve and enhance Nabors position,
notwithstanding the industrys characteristics. The
Committee reviews and approves all of the policies under which
compensation is paid to our senior executive officers and
oversees and evaluates the effectiveness of the executive
compensation programs in hiring, motivating and retaining key
employees.
Nabors executive compensation program includes base salary
and incentive bonuses as follows:
Base salary. The Committee reviews the
performance of each senior executive officer individually with
the Chief Executive Officer and determines an appropriate salary
level for each senior executive officer based primarily on
individual performance and competitive factors. These
competitive factors include as a reference the base salary of
other top executives of drilling contractors and the oil service
sector generally, and also the compensation levels needed to
attract and retain highly talented executives from outside the
industry.
Incentive bonus program. Financial performance
goals for the Chief Executive Officer and President are set
forth in the contractual bonus formula described above under
MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION Employment
Contracts.
The Committee administers annual review programs to determine
overall rewards to senior executive officers and key employees
based upon Nabors performance in relation to performance
goals. The performance goals include both financial and
nonfinancial objectives, including achieving certain financial
targets in relation to internal budgets, developing internal
infrastructure and enhancing positions in certain markets. The
financial criteria include, among other things, increasing
revenues, controlling direct and overhead expenses and
increasing cash flow from operations. The nonfinancial criteria
include: obtainment of safety goals, maintaining Nabors
share in its principal geographic markets, enhancing
Nabors technical capabilities and developing operations in
identified strategic markets. Based on these reviews, the
Committee recommends annual incentive rewards. Annual incentive
awards include cash, options or restricted shares, or a
combination thereof. Share awards or stock option grants
typically have been issued on a four-year vesting schedule, but
the Committee reserves the right to modify the vesting schedule
in its discretion. Annual incentive bonus awards are not
guaranteed except for those provided under contractual
arrangements. The Committee believes that equity awards are
critical in motivating and rewarding the creation of long-term
shareholder value and the Committee has established a policy of
including equity awards in the employees overall
compensation package from time to time based on the continuing
progress of Nabors and on individual performance.
18
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, limits to $1 million the amount of compensation
that may be deducted by Nabors in any year with respect to
certain of Nabors highest paid executives. Certain
performance-based compensation that has been approved by
shareholders is not subject to the $1 million limit, nor is
compensation paid pursuant to employment contracts in existence
prior to the adoption of Section 162(m) in 1993. Although
the contractual bonus arrangements remained the same from their
previous contracts, certain bonus compensation, as well as the
share options granted to Mr. Isenberg and Mr. Petrello
pursuant to the new and amended employment contracts entered
into in 1996 may not be exempt from Section 162(m).
Consequently, Nabors may not be able to deduct that portion of
such compensation that exceeds $1 million (see
MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION-Option/Exercises During 2004 and
Year-End Options Values and Employment
Contracts). While Nabors intends to take reasonable steps
to obtain deductibility of compensation, it reserves the right
not to do so in its judgment, particularly with respect to
retaining the service of its principal executive officers.
Chief
Executive Officer and President
Nabors arrangements with its Chief Executive Officer and
President have been designed from the outset to align their
compensation with enhancing shareholder value.
Mr. Isenbergs compensation was originally negotiated
with a creditors committee in 1987 in connection with the
reorganization proceedings of Anglo Energy, Inc., which
subsequently changed its name to Nabors. These contractual
arrangements were subsequently approved by the various
constituencies in those reorganization proceedings, including
equity and debt holders, and confirmed by the United States
Bankruptcy Court. Mr. Petrellos employment agreement
was first entered into effective October 1, 1991, was
agreed upon as part of arms length negotiations with the
Board before he joined Nabors in October 1991, and was reviewed
and approved by the Committee and the full Board of Directors at
that time.
The employment agreements for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello
were amended in 1994 and 1996. These amendments were approved by
the Committee and the full Board of Directors at that time.
These agreements may limit the Committees flexibility in
designing compensation programs for these executives.
Mr. Isenbergs base salary remained constant from 1987
through the end of 2003 and Mr. Petrellos base salary
remained constant since his employment began in 1991 through the
end of 2003. The major portion of Mr. Isenbergs and
Mr. Petrellos cash compensation is performance-based
bonus compensation. In addition to a base salary, their
employment agreements provide for annual cash bonuses in an
amount equal to 6% and 2%, respectively, of Nabors net
cash flow (as defined in the respective employment agreements)
in excess of 15% of the average shareholders equity for
each fiscal year. (Mr. Isenbergs cash bonus formula
originally was set at 10% in excess of a 10% return on
shareholders equity and he has voluntarily reduced it over
time to its 6% in excess of 15% level.) Mr. Petrellos
bonus is subject to a minimum of $700,000 per year. In 15
of the last 16 years, Mr. Isenberg has agreed
voluntarily to accept a lower annual cash bonus (i.e., an amount
lower than the amount provided for under his employment
agreement) in light of his overall compensation package.
Mr. Petrello has agreed voluntarily to accept a lower
annual cash bonus (i.e., an amount lower than the amount
provided for under his employment agreement) in light of his
overall compensation package in 13 of the last 15 years.
For 2005 the annual cash bonuses for Messrs. Isenberg and
Petrello pursuant to the formula described in their employment
agreements were $41.2 million and $13.7 million,
respectively; but in light of their overall compensation package
(including significant stock option grants and restricted stock
awards), they agreed to accept cash bonuses in the amounts of
$3 million and $1.5 million, respectively. There can
be no assurance that Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello will agree in
the future to accept annual cash bonuses in an amount less than
the cash amounts provided for in their agreements.
19
Mr. Isenberg voluntarily agreed to amend his employment
agreement in March 2006. Under the 2006 Amendment,
Mr. Isenberg agreed to reduce the annual cash bonus to an
amount equal to 3% of Nabors net cash flow (as defined in
his employment agreement) in excess of 15% of the average
shareholders equity for 2006. For 2007 through the
expiration date of the employment agreement, the annual cash
bonus will return to 6% of Nabors net cash flow (as
defined in his employment agreement) in excess of 15% of the
average shareholders equity for each fiscal year.
On December 5, 2005, taking into account the reduction in
annual cash bonus provided for in the employment agreements, the
Committee granted to Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello
1,333,333 and 666,667 stock options, respectively, with a per
share exercise price of $71.61, the closing price of an
underlying share on the date of grant (vesting on
December 30, 2005). On February 28, 2006, taking into
account the reduction in annual cash bonus provided for in the
employment agreements, the Committee also granted to
Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello 100,000 and 50,000 restricted
shares, respectively (vesting pro rata over a three year period).
In reviewing Mr. Isenbergs and
Mr. Petrellos compensation, the Committee noted that
Nabors financial results in 2005 were the best in the
Companys history, with significant financial and
operational achievements in virtually every operating and
business category. The Company generated significant free cash
flows after an aggressive capital expenditure program. The
Committee also took notice of the strategies employed by senior
management to help ensure the continued financial success of the
Company over the ensuing years including
organic growth in developing and deploying new, state of the art
rigs at attractive costs, obtaining long-term contracts with key
customers, and negotiating favorable arrangements with key
vendors to ensure availability of equipment needed to support
the Companys growth. These strategies have resulted in
capturing approximately one-third of the new rig contract
opportunities worldwide, among over 200 competitors, mostly with
term contracts from creditworthy customers that assure high
returns and short term payouts.
The senior executive management team in place for many years has
demonstrated its versatility and leadership in forging a stable
and effective organization. The Compensation Committee also
noted The Wall Street Journals special supplement
published on February 27, 2006 which again listed Nabors
among the top U.S. companies in long-term shareholder
returns, with a one-year return of 47% and a ten-year return of
21%, meriting placement in the top 20% of its list of 1,000
largest companies.
The Compensation Committee believes that the consistent high
ranking of Nabors in such studies throughout the industrys
cyclical ups and downs validates its assertion that the current
management team has delivered consistently superior returns to
its shareholders over the long term. In fact, according to
Bloomberg, Nabors ten-year average is 21.28% which is
nearly triple that of the S&P 500 (the ten-year average
return for companies in the S&P 500 Index is 7.29% for the
ten-year period ending December 31, 2005). The Compensation
Committee also believes that retention and financial motivation
of the current management team is vital to sustaining this level
of performance.
The Committee is mindful that the competitive, financial
accounting, and regulatory landscape of executive compensation
continues to evolve. The Committee accordingly has made
adjustments in the forms of equity-based compensation and, at
the Committees recommendation, the Board of Directors in
March 2006 exercised its election to fix the expiration date of
the employment agreements for Messrs. Isenberg and
Petrello. Accordingly these agreements will expire at the end of
their current term at September 30, 2010, which will permit
the Committee to exercise greater flexibility in determining the
incentive arrangements for the Companys senior executives.
20
Financial
Highlights Nabors Industries Ltd. and
Subsidiaries
(In
millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 Versus 2004
|
|
|
2005 Versus 2000
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year(1)
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
Financial Data
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Revenues and earnings from
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
$
|
3,465.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,398.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,414.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,067.5
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
2,050.7
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
648.7
|
|
|
|
302.5
|
|
|
|
137.4
|
|
|
|
346.2
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
511.3
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
Net income per diluted Share
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
1.92
|
|
|
|
.90
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
3,758.1
|
|
|
|
2,929.4
|
|
|
|
1,806.5
|
|
|
|
828.7
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
1,951.6
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Year end market value of shares
outstanding
|
|
$
|
11,945.5
|
|
|
$
|
7,686.4
|
|
|
$
|
8,669.3
|
|
|
$
|
4,259.1
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
3,276.2
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The fiscal years ended 2005, 2004
and 2000 are for the period January 1 through December 31.
|
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE (as
of
April 30, 2006)
Martin J. Whitman, Chairman
Alexander M. Knaster
James L. Payne
Hans Schmidt
Myron M. Sheinfeld
21
REPORT OF
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee is comprised of three independent directors
and operates pursuant to a written Charter that is available on
our website at www.nabors.com. In 2005 the Committee met four
times. The primary purposes of the Audit Committee are to assist
the Board in monitoring (a) the quality and integrity of
the financial statements of Nabors; (b) the independent
auditors qualifications and independence; (c) the
performance of Nabors independent auditors; and
(d) compliance by Nabors with legal and regulatory
requirements. The Board has determined that the Audit
Committees current composition satisfies the rules of the
NYSE that govern audit committee composition, including the
requirement that each member of the Audit Committee be
independent as that term is defined under the
listing standards of the NYSE and specified in
Rule 10A-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In addition, the
Board has determined that Mr. Whitman is an audit
committee financial expert as defined under the current
rules of the SEC.
Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and
integrity of Nabors financial statements, accounting and
financial reporting principles and internal controls and
procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting
standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent
auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of
the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards. The independent auditors have free access to
the Audit Committee to discuss any matters they deem appropriate.
In performing its oversight role, the Audit Committee has
reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with
management and the independent auditors. The Audit Committee has
also discussed with the independent auditors the matters
required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards
No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as
updated by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 89, Audit
Adjustments, and Statement on Auditing Standards
No. 90, Audit Committee Communications. The
Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter
from the independent auditors required by Independence Standards
Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with
Audit Committees, as currently in effect and has discussed
with the independent auditors their independence. The Audit
Committee has also considered whether the provision of certain
non-audit services by the independent auditors is compatible
with maintaining the auditors independence and has
enhanced its pre-approval policies and procedures for services
provided by our independent auditors. The Committee also reviews
reports received from the internal auditors and corrective
actions taken by management where warranted.
During fiscal 2005 the Audit Committee performed all of its
duties and responsibilities under the then-applicable Audit
Committee Charter. In addition, based on the review and
discussions described in this Report of the Audit Committee, the
Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors and the
Board approved that the audited financial statements of Nabors
for fiscal 2005 be included in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for such fiscal year.
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE (as of April 30, 2006)
Myron M. Sheinfeld, Chairman
Martin J. Whitman
Hans W. Schmidt
Preapproval of independent auditor
services. The Audit Committee preapproves all
audit and permitted non-audit services (including the fees and
terms thereof) to be performed for the Company by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PricewaterhouseCoopers),
the Companys independent auditors. The Chairman of the
Audit Committee may preapprove additional permissible proposed
non-audit services that arise between Committee meetings,
provided that the decision to pre-approve the service is
presented for ratification at the next regularly scheduled
Committee meeting.
22
Independent
Auditor Fees
The following table summarizes the aggregate fees for
professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers. The
Audit Committee pre-approved fiscal 2005 services and 2004
services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
4,111,481
|
|
|
$
|
4,787,460
|
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
24,166
|
|
|
|
314,799
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
661,241
|
|
|
|
1,133,206
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,796,888
|
|
|
$
|
6,235,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Audit fees for the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2004, respectively, include fees for professional services
rendered for the audits of the consolidated financial statements
of the Company, the audit of managements report on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting and PricewaterhouseCoopers own audit
of the Companys internal control over financial reporting,
in each case as required by Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and applicable SEC rules, statutory
audits, consents, and accounting consultation attendant to the
audit.
The Audit-Related fees as of the years ended
December 31, 2005 include consultations concerning
financial accounting and reporting standards. Audit related fees
for the year 2004 include audits of employee benefit plans, work
performed in anticipation of the requirements of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, limited to
data entry of the Companys policies and procedures into
the project management database of Section 404 compliance.
Tax fees as of the years ended December 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively, include services related to tax compliance,
including the preparation of tax returns and claims for refund;
and tax planning and tax advice.
There were no other professional services rendered during 2005
or 2004.
|
|
|
* |
|
The aggregate fees included in Audit Fees are fees billed for
the fiscal years for the audit of the registrants
annual financial statements and review of financial statements
and statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. The
aggregate fees included in each of the other categories are fees
billed in the fiscal years. |
ITEM 2
APPROVAL AND APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS AND
AUTHORIZATION OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE TO SET THE AUDITORS
REMUNERATION
Under Bermuda law, our shareholders have the responsibility to
appoint the independent auditors of the Company to hold office
until the close of the next annual general meeting and to
authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to set
the auditors remuneration. At the annual general meeting,
the shareholders will be asked to approve the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors and to
authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to set
the independent auditors remuneration.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, or a predecessor, has been our
independent auditors since May 1987.
A representative from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is expected to
be present at the annual general meeting, will have the
opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so,
and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
23
Directors
Recommendation
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE
APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS OF THE COMPANY AND TO AUTHORIZE THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO SET THE AUDITORS
REMUNERATION.
ITEM 3
APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 2003 EMPLOYEE STOCK
PLAN
We are asking our shareholders to approve our Amended and
Restated 2003 Employee Stock Plan (the Plan) so that
we may continue to attract and retain talented employees
necessary for the Companys continued growth and success.
We want to set the number of common shares of our common stock
that can be issued under the Plan at 7 million common
shares, and also provide, commencing on June 1, 2006, and
thereafter for a period of four (4) years on each
January 1, for an automatic increase in the number of
shares reserved and available for issuance under the Plan by an
amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Companys
outstanding common shares as of such June 1 or January 1 date.
In addition, the aggregate number of shares of common stock that
are reserved and available for issuance under the Plan will be
automatically increased in the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
if the exercise price of an option granted under the Plan
exceeds the fair market value of our common shares at the date
of grant, the aggregate number of available common shares will
be automatically increased by an amount based on the following
formula:
|
Increase = ([M/E] - 1) x G
|
|
|
|
M =
|
Value of the option if it were granted at fair market value
(using either a Black Scholes or Lattice Model)
|
|
|
|
|
E =
|
Value of the option at its actual exercise price (using either a
Black Scholes or Lattice Model)
|
G = Number of options granted to option holder at above market
value
|
|
|
|
|
if a cap value is placed on the option pursuant to the award
agreement, the aggregate number of available common shares will
be automatically increased by an amount based on the following
formula:
|
Increase = ([M/E] - 1) x G
M = Black Scholes value of the option that is not capped at the
date of grant
E = Lattice Model value of a capped option at the date of grant
G = Number of capped options granted to option holder
If the fair market value of the common shares on the exercise
date exceeds the cap value, the number of common shares to be
issued to the participant under the award agreement will be
reduced to ensure that the value of each share on the exercise
date received by the participant upon exercise of the option
will not exceed the cap value.
The adjustment in the formula is intended to permit the Company
to issue performance-based option awards (i.e., awards issued
with an exercise price greater than the market price on the date
of award premium-priced options) or
option awards subject to a cap in the amount of appreciation
which can be realized capped option
awards. To the extent that the Company issues
premium-priced options or capped option awards, the number of
common shares which could be issued under the plan would be
increased pursuant to the formulas described above, which is
intended to create additional authorized common shares under the
plan to the extent that the value of the premium-priced options
or capped option awards is less than the value of awards which
are not subject to those restrictions.
24
Various shareholder groups have advocated premium priced options
as a mechanism to help ensure that equity incentives are more
closely aligned with shareholders interests by having more
demanding corporate performance goals. Similarly, capped option
awards, which limit the appreciation that can be realized under
an option award, arguably help ensure that an optionee does not
profit unduly from broad-based gains of the stock market.
The Company believes that it would be more likely to issue
premium-priced options or capped options awards (which have a
lower value at the time of the award than awards without such
limitations) if it had additional shares which could be issued
to optionees under the Plan.
The approval of the Plan requires the vote of a majority of the
voting power of the shares that are present by person or by
proxy and entitled to vote at the annual general meeting. Our
Named Executive Officers and directors have an interest in this
proposal because they, along with other eligible employees, may
participate in the Plan.
Description
of the Plan
The following paragraphs provide a summary of the principal
features of the Plan and its operation. The Plan is set forth in
its entirety as Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement. The
following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to
Exhibit A.
The Plan will reserve for issuance a maximum of 7,000,000 common
shares, subject to increase as set forth above. If an award
granted under the Plan expires or is terminated, the common
shares underlying the award will again be available under the
Plan. In addition, to the extent common shares are used to
exercise any award (as described below) or to satisfy tax
withholding obligations under the Plan, an equal number of
shares will remain available for issuance under the Plan.
No individual may be granted awards under the Plan in any
calendar year covering more than 3,000,000 shares.
In the event of any change in the Companys capitalization
or in the event of a corporate transaction such as a merger,
amalgamation, consolidation, separation or similar event, the
Plan provides for appropriate adjustments in the number and
class of common shares available for issuance or grant and in
the number
and/or price
of shares subject to awards.
Types of Awards
The Plan permits a variety of types of awards to be granted
under the Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
stock options, including incentive stock options and
non-qualified stock options,
|
|
|
|
restricted stock,
|
|
|
|
restricted stock units,
|
|
|
|
stock appreciation rights, and
|
|
|
|
stock bonuses.
|
These awards are all described in more detail below.
Administration
The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors. The Committee may, subject to the provisions
of the Plan, determine the persons to whom awards will be
granted, the type of awards to be granted, the number of shares
to be made subject to awards and the exercise price. The
Committee may also condition the award on the attainment of
certain goals, determine other terms and conditions that shall
apply to awards, interpret the Plan and prescribe, amend and
rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan. The
Committee may delegate to any of
25
our employees (or a committee of employees) the authority to
make grants of awards to our employees who are not our executive
officers or directors. The terms and conditions of each award
granted under the Plan are set forth in a written award
agreement relating to the award.
In the event that the Committee grants an award that is intended
to constitute qualified performance-based compensation within
the meaning Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee in
its discretion may condition payment under the award in whole or
in part on the attainment of (or a specified increase or
decrease in) one or more of the following business criteria as
applied to an award recipient under the Plan
and/or a
business unit of the Company or its subsidiaries or affiliates:
(i) income before federal taxes and net interest expense;
(ii) achievement of specific and measurable operational
objectives in the areas of rig operating costs, accident
records, and employee turnover; (iii) working capital,
generally defined to include receivables, inventories and
controllable current liabilities, measured either in absolute
dollars or relative to sales; (iv) earnings growth,
revenues, expenses, share price, market share, return on assets,
return or capital, equity or investment, regulatory compliance,
satisfactory internal or external audits, improvement of
financial ratings, or achievement of balance sheet, income
statement or cash flow objectives; (v) adjusted cash flow
or adjusted income derived from operating activities;
and/or
(vi) a percentage of cash flow in excess of a percentage of
shareholders average book equity. Payments under such
awards will be made, in the case of employees covered under
Section 162(m) of the Code, solely on account of the
attainment of such performance goals established in writing by
the Committee not later than the date on which 25% of the period
of service to which the award relates has elapsed (or if
earlier, 90 days after the beginning of the period).
Eligibility
Awards may be granted under the Plan to employees of the Company
or its subsidiaries or affiliates, as selected by the Committee
in its sole discretion. Member of the Board of Directors also
receive the equity component of their compensation pursuant to
the Plan.
Terms and
Conditions of Options
Stock options granted under the Plan may be either
incentive stock options, as that term is defined in
Section 422 of the Code, or non-qualified stock options
(i.e., any option that is not such an incentive stock option).
The exercise price of a stock option granted under the Plan is
determined by the Committee at the time the option is granted,
but the exercise price may not be less than the fair market
value of the common shares (determined generally as the closing
price per common share of the Company on the date of grant).
Stock options are exercisable at the times and upon the
conditions that the Committee may determine, as reflected in the
applicable option agreement. The Committee will also determine
the maximum duration of the period in which the option may be
exercised, which may not exceed ten years from the date of grant.
The option exercise price must be paid in full at the time of
exercise, and is payable (in the discretion of the Committee) by
any one of the following methods or a combination thereof:
|
|
|
|
|
in cash or cash equivalents,
|
|
|
|
the surrender of previously acquired common shares that have
been held by the participant for at least six months prior to
the date of surrender, or
|
|
|
|
to the extent permitted by applicable law, through a
broker cashless exercise procedure acceptable to the
Committee.
|
Restricted
Stock
The Plan provides for awards of common shares that are subject
to restrictions on transferability and other restrictions
determined by the Committee in its discretion. Such restrictions
will lapse on
26
terms established by the Committee. Except as may be otherwise
provided under the award agreement relating to the restricted
stock, a participant granted restricted stock will have all the
rights of a shareholder (for instance, the right to receive
dividends on the shares of restricted stock, if any, and the
right to vote the shares). The restricted period shall not be
less than three years, but the restricted period can be
shortened to one or more years if vesting of the restricted
stock unit is conditioned upon the attainment of the performance
goals identified above or other corporate or individual
performance goals established by the Committee at the time of
grant.
Restricted
Stock Units
The Plan permits awards of restricted stock units which, upon
vesting, entitle the participant to receive an amount in cash or
common shares (as determined by the Committee and set forth in
the applicable award agreement) equal to the fair market value
of the number of shares made subject to the award. Vesting of
all or a portion of a restricted stock unit award may be subject
to terms and conditions established by the Committee. As with
awards of restricted stock, the restricted period shall not be
less than three years, but the restricted period can be
shortened to one or more years if vesting of the restricted
stock is conditioned upon the attainment of the performance
goals identified above or other corporate or individual
performance goals established by the Committee at the time of
grant.
Stock
Appreciation Rights (SARs)
The Plan permits the Committee, in its discretion, to award
stock appreciation rights, either in tandem with stock options
or freestanding and unrelated to options. The grant price of a
freestanding SAR will be the fair market value of a common share
(as described above). The grant price of tandem SARs will equal
the exercise price of the related option. Tandem SARs may be
exercised for all or part of the shares subject to the related
option upon surrender of the right to exercise the equivalent
portion of the related option. Freestanding SARs may be
exercised upon whatever terms and conditions the Committee
imposes. SARs will be payable in cash, common shares or a
combination of both, as determined in the Committees
discretion and set forth in the applicable award agreement.
Stock
Bonuses
The Plan permits the Committee, in its discretion, to award
common shares to employees that are not subject to restrictions
on transferability or otherwise, but only in lieu of salary or a
cash bonus otherwise payable to the employee.
Change
in Control
The Committee in its discretion may provide that, in the event
of a change in control (as defined in an applicable award
agreement), whether alone or in combination with other events,
the vesting and exercisability restrictions on any outstanding
award that is not yet fully vested and exercisable will lapse in
part or in full.
Termination
of Employment
Unless otherwise determined by the Committee in an award
agreement, the termination of a participants employment or
service will immediately cancel any awards granted to the
participant under the Plan, whether or not it is then
exercisable. However, in no case may an option be exercised
after it expires.
Amendment
and Termination
The Board of Directors may modify or terminate the Plan or any
portion of the Plan at any time, except that an amendment that
requires shareholder approval in order for the Plan to continue
to
27
comply with any law, regulation or stock exchange requirement
will not be effective unless approved by the requisite vote of
our shareholders. In addition, any amendment shall be subject to
approval of our shareholders if it materially increases the
benefits accruing to participants under the Plan, materially
increases the number of shares that may be issued under the
Plan, or materially modifies the requirements for participation
in the Plan. Any amendment to the Plan or an award agreement
that accelerates the date on which an award is exercisable or
payable or that reduces the exercise price of any outstanding
option will also be subject to the approval of our shareholders.
No awards may be granted under the Plan after the day prior to
the tenth anniversary of the date of its approval by the
Companys shareholders, but awards granted prior to that
time can continue after such time in accordance with their terms.
Certain
Federal Income Tax Consequences of Options
The following is a discussion of certain federal income tax
effects currently applicable to stock options granted under the
Plan. The discussion is a summary only, and the applicable law
is subject to change. Reference is made to the Code for a
complete statement of all relevant federal tax provisions.
Nonqualified
Stock Options (NSOs)
An optionee generally will not recognize taxable income upon the
grant of an NSO. Rather, at the time of exercise of such NSO,
the optionee will recognize ordinary income for income tax
purposes in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market
value of the shares purchased over the exercise price. The
Company will generally be entitled to a tax deduction at such
time and in the same amount that the optionee recognizes
ordinary income.
If shares acquired upon exercise of an NSO are later sold or
exchanged, then the difference between the amount received upon
such sale, exchange or disposition and the fair market value of
such shares on the date of such exercise will generally be
taxable as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss (if the
shares are a capital asset of the optionee) depending upon the
length of time such shares were held by the optionee.
Incentive
Stock Options (ISOs)
An optionee will not recognize any ordinary income (and the
Company will not be permitted any deduction) upon the grant or
timely exercise of an ISO. However, the amount by which the fair
market value of the common shares on the exercise date of an ISO
exceeds the purchase price generally will constitute an item
which increases the optionees alternative minimum
taxable income.
Exercise of an ISO will be timely if made during its term and if
the optionee remains an employee of the Company or a subsidiary
at all times during the period beginning on the date of grant of
the ISO and ending on the date three months before the date of
exercise (or one year before the date of exercise in the case of
a disabled optionee, and without limit in the case of death).
The tax consequences of an untimely exercise of an ISO will be
determined in accordance with the rules applicable to NSOs,
discussed above.
If shares acquired pursuant to the timely exercise of an ISO are
later disposed of, and if the shares are a capital asset of the
optionee, the optionee generally will recognize short-term or
long-term capital gain or loss (depending upon the length of
time such shares were held by the optionee) equal to the
difference between the amount realized upon such sale and the
exercise price. The Company, under these circumstances, will not
be entitled to any income tax deduction in connection with
either the exercise of the ISO or the sale of such shares by the
optionee.
If, however, shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an ISO
is disposed of by the optionee prior to the expiration of two
years from the date of grant of the ISO or within one year from
the date such shares are transferred to him or her upon exercise
(a disqualifying disposition), any gain realized by
28
the optionee generally will be taxable at the time of such
disqualifying disposition as follows: (i) at ordinary
income rates to the extent of the difference between the
exercise price and the lesser of the fair market value of the
shares on the date the ISO is exercised or the amount realized
on such disqualifying disposition and (ii) if the shares
are a capital asset of the optionee, as short-term or long-term
capital gain (depending upon the length of time such shares were
held by the optionee) to the extent of any excess of the amount
realized on such disqualifying disposition over the sum of the
exercise price and any ordinary income recognized by the
optionee. In such case, the Company may claim an income tax
deduction at the time of such disqualifying disposition for the
amount taxable to the optionee as ordinary income.
THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF NABORS
INDUSTRIES LTD. AMENDED AND RESTATED
2003 EMPLOYEE STOCK PLAN.
SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires Nabors directors and executive officers, and persons
who own more than 10% of a registered class of Nabors
equity securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the NYSE initial reports of ownership and reports
of changes in ownership of common shares and other equity
securities of Nabors. Officers, directors and greater than 10%
shareholders are required by Commission regulation to furnish
Nabors with copies of all Section 16(a) forms which they
file.
To our knowledge, based solely on our review of the copies of
Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to us during
2005 and Form 5 and amendments thereto furnished to us with
respect to the year 2005, and written representations that no
other reports were required, all Section 16(a) filings
required to be made by Nabors officers, directors and
greater than 10% beneficial owners with respect to the fiscal
year 2005 were timely filed, except that Mr. Martin Whitman
filed one Form 4 late with respect to a single sale
transaction that occurred in May 2005.
SHAREHOLDER
MATTERS
Bermuda has exchange controls which apply to residents in
respect of the Bermudian dollar. As an exempt company, Nabors is
considered to be nonresident for such controls; consequently,
there are no Bermuda governmental restrictions on the
Companys ability to make transfers and carry out
transactions in all other currencies, including currency of the
United States.
There is no reciprocal tax treaty between Bermuda and the United
States regarding withholding taxes. Under existing Bermuda law,
there is no Bermuda income or withholding tax on dividends, if
any, paid by Nabors to its shareholders. Furthermore, no Bermuda
tax or other levy is payable on the sale or other transfer
(including by gift or on the death of the shareholder) of Nabors
common shares (other than by shareholders resident in Bermuda).
29
STOCK
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph illustrates comparisons of five-year
cumulative total returns among Nabors Industries Ltd., the
S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones Oil Equipment and Services
Index. Total return assumes $100 invested on December 31,
2000 in shares of Nabors Industries Ltd., the S&P 500 Index,
and the Dow Jones Oil Equipment and Services Index. It also
assumes reinvestment of dividends and is calculated at the end
of each calendar year, December 31, 2001 to
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
Nabors
Industries
Ltd.
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Dow Jones Oil Equipment and
Services Index
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSALS
Shareholders who, in accordance with the SECs
Rule 14a-8,
wish to present proposals for inclusion in the proxy materials
to be distributed by us in connection with our 2007 annual
general meeting of shareholders must submit their proposals and
their proposals must be received at our principal executive
offices no later than January 5, 2007. As the rules of the
SEC make clear, simply submitting a proposal does not guarantee
its inclusion.
In accordance with our Bye-Laws, in order to be properly brought
before the 2007 annual general meeting, a shareholder notice of
the matter the shareholder wishes to present must be delivered
to the Secretary of Nabors at Nabors Industries Ltd., P.O.
Box HM3349, Hamilton, HMPX, Bermuda, not less than sixty
(60) nor more than ninety (90) days prior to the first
anniversary of this years annual general meeting
(provided, however, that if the 2007 annual general meeting is
called for a date that is not within thirty (30) days
before or after such anniversary date, notice must be received
not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day
following the day on which notice of the date of the annual
general meeting is mailed or public disclosure of the date of
the annual general meeting is made, whichever first occurs). As
a result, any notice given by or on behalf of a shareholder
pursuant to
30
these provisions of our Bye-Laws (and not pursuant to the
SECs
Rule 14a-8)
generally must be received no earlier than March 9, 2007
and no later than April 7, 2007.
OTHER
MATTERS
The Board knows of no other business to come before the annual
general meeting. However, if any other matters are properly
brought before the annual general meeting, the persons named in
the accompanying form of proxy, or their substitutes, will vote
in their discretion on such matters.
Costs of Solicitation. We will pay the
expenses of the preparation of the proxy materials and the
solicitation by the Board of your proxy. We have retained
Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc., 17 State Street, New
York, New York 10004 to solicit proxies on behalf of the Board
of Directors at an estimated cost of $15,000 plus reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses. Proxies may be solicited on behalf of the Board of
Directors by mail, in person and by telephone. Proxy materials
will also be provided for distribution through brokers,
custodians, and other nominees and fiduciaries. We will
reimburse such parties for their reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses for forwarding the proxy materials.
Financial Statements. The financial statements
for the Companys 2005 fiscal year will be presented at the
annual general meeting.
Shareholder Communications with
Directors. Shareholders may contact any of the
Companys directors, a committee of the Board of Directors,
the Boards independent directors as a group or the Board
generally, by writing to them at Nabors Industries Ltd., P.O.
Box HM3349, Hamilton, HMPX, Bermuda. Shareholder
communications received in this manner will be handled in
accordance with procedures approved by the Boards
independent directors. The Boards Policy Regarding
Shareholder Communications with the Board of Directors is
available at www.nabors.com. In addition, the Company encourages
directors to attend the annual general meeting of shareholders.
Four directors attended the 2005 annual general meeting of
shareholders.
NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD.
Daniel McLachlin
Secretary
Dated:
May 5, 2006
31
EXHIBIT SCHEDULE
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Document
|
|
Exhibit A
|
|
Amended and Restated 2003 Employee
Stock Plan
|
EXHIBIT A
NABORS
INDUSTRIES LTD.
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2003 EMPLOYEE STOCK PLAN
|
|
Section 1.
|
Purpose
of Plan.
|
The name of this plan is the Nabors Industries Ltd. Amended and
Restated 2003 Employee Stock Plan (the Plan). The
purpose of the Plan is to provide additional incentive to those
officers and employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries and
Affiliates whose contributions are essential to the growth and
success of the Companys business, in order to strengthen
the commitment of such persons to the Company and its
Subsidiaries and Affiliates, motivate such persons to faithfully
and diligently perform their responsibilities and attract and
retain competent and dedicated persons whose efforts will result
in the long-term growth and profitability of the Company and its
Subsidiaries and Affiliates. To accomplish such purposes, the
Plan provides that the Company may grant Incentive Stock
Options, Nonqualified Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights,
Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, and Stock Bonuses. The
Plan is intended to permit awards that satisfy the requirements
of section 162(m) of the Code and shall be interpreted in a
manner consistent with the requirements thereof.
For purposes of the Plan, in addition to terms defined elsewhere
in the Plan, the following terms shall be defined as set forth
below:
(a) Administrator means the Board, or if
and to the extent the Board does not administer the Plan, the
Committee, in accordance with Section 3 hereof.
(b) Affiliate means any corporation or
other entity, more than 50% of the voting power of the
outstanding voting securities of which is owned by the Company,
its Subsidiaries, or any other Affiliate.
(c) Award means an award of Incentive
Stock Options, Nonqualified Stock Options, Stock Appreciation
Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, or Stock Bonus
under the Plan.
(d) Award Agreement means, with respect
to any Award, the written agreement between the Company and the
Participant setting forth the terms and conditions of the Award.
(e) Board means the Board of Directors
of the Company.
(f) Change in Capitalization means any
increase, reduction, or change or exchange of Shares for a
different number or kind of shares or other securities or
property by reason of a reclassification, recapitalization,
merger, amalgamation, consolidation, reorganization, issuance of
warrants or rights, stock dividend, stock split or reverse stock
split, combination or exchange of shares, repurchase of shares,
change in corporate structure or otherwise; or any other
corporate action, such as declaration of a special dividend,
that affects the capitalization of the Company.
(g) Code means the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended from time to time, or any successor thereto.
(h) Committee means any committee or
subcommittee the Board may appoint to administer the Plan. If at
any time or to any extent the Board shall not administer the
Plan, then the functions of the Administrator specified in the
Plan shall be exercised by the Committee. Unless otherwise
determined by the Board, the composition of the Committee shall
at all times consist solely of persons who are
(i) Nonemployee Directors as defined in
Rule 16b-3
issued under the Exchange Act, and (ii) outside
directors as defined in section 162(m) of the Code.
A-1
(i) Common Shares means the common
shares, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company.
(j) Company means Nabors Industries
Ltd., a Bermuda exempt company (or any successor corporation).
(k) Disability means (1) any
physical or mental condition that would qualify a Participant
for a disability benefit under any long-term disability plan
maintained by the Company (or by the Subsidiary or Affiliate by
which he is employed); (2) when used in connection with the
exercise of an Incentive Stock Option following termination of
employment, disability within the meaning of
section 22(e)(3) of the Code; or (3) such other
condition as may be determined in the sole discretion of the
Administrator to constitute Disability.
(l) Eligible Recipient means an employee
or officer of the Company or of any Subsidiary or Affiliate, and
in the case of awards of Restricted Stock, shall include
nonemployee directors of the Company.
(m) Exchange Act shall mean the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.
(n) Exercise Price means the per share
price at which a holder of an Option may purchase the Shares
issuable upon exercise of the Option.
(o) Fair Market Value of a Common Share
as of a particular date shall mean (1) the closing sale
price reported for such share on the national securities
exchange or national market system on which such share is
principally traded on such date (or, if there were no trades on
such date, on the most recently preceding day on which there was
a sale), or (2) if the Common Shares are not then listed on
a national securities exchange or national market system, or the
value of such shares is not otherwise determinable, such value
as determined by the Administrator in good faith in its sole
discretion.
(p) Freestanding SAR means an SAR that
is granted independently of any Options, as described
Section 11 hereof.
(q) Immediate Family means any child,
stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, spouse,
sibling,
mother-in-law,
father-in-law,
son-in-law,
daughter-in-law,
brother-in-law
or
sister-in-law,
including adoptive relationships of the Participant; trusts for
the benefit of such immediate family members; or partnerships in
which such immediate family members are the only partners.
(r) Incentive Stock Option shall mean an
Option that is an incentive stock option
within the meaning of section 422 of the Code, or any
successor provision, and that is designated by the Administrator
as an Incentive Stock Option.
(s) Nonqualified Stock Option means any
Option that is not an Incentive Stock Option, including any
Option that provides (as of the time such Option is granted)
that it will not be treated as an Incentive Stock Option.
(t) Option means an Incentive Stock
Option, a Nonqualified Stock Option, or either or both of them,
as the context requires.
(u) Participant means any Eligible
Recipient selected by the Administrator, pursuant to the
Administrators authority in Section 3 hereof, to
receive grants of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights or awards
of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, or Stock Bonus. A
Participant who receives the grant of an Option is sometimes
referred to herein as Optionee.
(v) Performance Goal shall mean one or
more of the following business criteria applied to a Participant
and/or a
business unit or the Company
and/or a
Subsidiary: (i) income before
A-2
federal taxes and net interest expense; (ii) achievement of
specific and measurable operational objectives in the areas of
rig operating costs, accident records, and employee turnover;
(iii) working capital, generally defined to include
receivables, inventories and controllable current liabilities,
measured either in absolute dollars or relative to sales;
(iv) earnings growth, revenues, expenses, share price,
market share, return on assets, return on capital, equity or
investment, regulatory compliance, satisfactory internal or
external audits, improvement of financial ratings, or
achievement of balance sheet, income statement or cash flow
objectives; (v) adjusted cash flows or adjusted income
derived from operating activities;
and/or
(vi) a percentage of cash flow in excess of a percentage of
shareholders average book equity.
(w) Restricted Stock Unit means the
right to receive a Share or the Fair Market Value of a Share in
cash granted pursuant to Section 9 hereof.
(x) Restricted Stock means Shares
subject to certain restrictions granted pursuant to
Section 8 hereof.
(y) Shares means Common Shares and the
common equity of any successor security.
(z) Stock Appreciation Right or
SAR means an Award, granted alone or in
connection with a related Option, designated as an SAR, pursuant
to Section 11 hereof.
(aa) Stock Bonus means the right to
receive a Share granted pursuant to Section 10 hereof.
(bb) Subsidiary means any corporation
(other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations
beginning with the Company, if each of the corporations (other
than the last corporation) in the unbroken chain owns stock
possessing more than 50% of the total combined voting power of
all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in the
chain.
(cc) Tandem SAR means an SAR that is
granted in connection with a related Option pursuant to
Section 11 hereof, the exercise of which shall require
forfeiture of the right to purchase a Share under the related
Option (and when a Share is purchased under the Option, the
Tandem SAR shall similarly be canceled).
Section 3. Administration.
(a) The Plan shall be administered by the Board or, at the
Boards sole discretion, by the Committee, which shall
serve at the pleasure of the Board. Pursuant to the terms of the
Plan, the Administrator shall have the power and authority,
without limitation:
(i) to select those Eligible Recipients who shall be
Participants;
(ii) to determine in an Award Agreement whether and to what
extent Options or Stock Appreciation Rights or awards of
Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, or Stock Bonus are to
be granted hereunder to Participants;
(iii) to determine in an Award Agreement the number of
Shares to be covered by each Award granted hereunder;
(iv) to determine in an Award Agreement the terms and
conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, of each
Award granted hereunder;
(v) to determine the terms and conditions, not inconsistent
with the terms of the Plan, which shall govern all written
instruments evidencing Options or Stock Appreciation Rights or
awards of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, or Stock
Bonus granted hereunder;
(vi) to adopt, alter and repeal such administrative rules,
guidelines and practices governing the Plan as it shall from
time to time deem advisable; and
A-3
(vii) to interpret the terms and provisions of the Plan and
any Award issued under the Plan (and any Award Agreement
relating thereto), and to otherwise supervise the administration
of the Plan.
(b) All decisions made by the Administrator pursuant to the
provisions of the Plan shall be final, conclusive and binding on
all persons, including the Company and the Participants. No
member of the Board or the Committee, nor any officer or
employee of the Company acting on behalf of the Board or the
Committee, shall be personally liable for any action,
determination, or interpretation taken or made in good faith
with respect to the Plan, and all members of the Board or the
Committee and each and any officer or employee of the Company
acting on their behalf shall, to the extent permitted by law, be
fully indemnified and protected by the Company in respect of any
such action, determination or interpretation.
(c) The Administrator in its discretion may condition
entitlement to an Award in whole or in part on the attainment of
one or more Performance Goals. The Administrator shall establish
any such Performance Goal not later than 90 days after the
commencement of the period of service to which the Award relates
if the period equals or exceeds one year (or if the period is
shorter, 25% of such period of service), and once granted, the
Administrator shall not have discretion to increase the amount
payable under such Award, provided, however, that whether or not
an Award is intended to constitute qualified performance based
compensation within the meaning of section 162(m) of the
Code, the Administrator shall have the authority to make
appropriate adjustments in Performance Goals under an Award to
reflect the impact of extraordinary items not reflected in such
Performance Goals. For purposes of the Plan, extraordinary items
shall be defined as (1) any profit or loss attributable to
acquisitions or dispositions of stock or assets, (2) any
changes in accounting standards that may be required or
permitted by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or adopted
by the Company after the goal is established, (3) all items
of gain, loss or expense for the year related to restructuring
charges for the Company, (4) all items of gain, loss or
expense for the year determined to be extraordinary or unusual
in nature or infrequent in occurrence or related to the disposal
of a segment of a business, (5) all items of gain, loss or
expense for the year related to discontinued operations as
defined in APB Opinion No. 30 or FAS No. 144, and
(6) such other items as may be prescribed by
section 162(m) of the Code and the Treasury Regulations
thereunder as may be in effect from time to time, and any
amendments, revisions or successor provisions and any changes
thereto.
(d) Subject to section 162(m) of the Code and except
as required by
Rule 16b-3
under the Exchange Act with respect to grants of Awards to
individuals who are subject to section 16 of the Exchange
Act, or as otherwise required for compliance with
Rule 16b-3
under the Exchange Act or other applicable law, the
Administrator may delegate all or any part of its authority
under the Plan to an employee, employees or committee of
employees of the Company or any Subsidiary.
(e) If at any time (whether before or after termination of
employment) a majority of either the Board or the Committee
determines that a Participant has engaged in fraud,
embezzlement, theft, commission of a felony, dishonesty, or any
other conduct inimical to the Company, either the Board or the
Committee (as the case may be) may provide for the immediate
forfeiture of any Award held by the Participant, whether or not
then vested. Any determination by the Board or Committee (as the
case may be) under this subsection (e) shall be final,
conclusive and binding on all persons.
Section 4. Shares Reserved
for Issuance Under the Plan.
(a) There shall be reserved and available for issuance
under the Plan 7,000,000 Common Shares. Commencing on
June 1, 2006, and thereafter for a period of four
(4) years on each January 1, the aggregate number of
Common Shares reserved and available for issuance under the Plan
shall be increased automatically by a number of shares equal to
two percent (2%) of the total outstanding Common Shares as of
such June 1 or January 1 date. In addition, the aggregate number
of Common
A-4
Shares that are reserved and available for issuance under the
Plan shall be automatically increased in the following
circumstances:
(i) if the Exercise Price of any Option granted under the
Plan exceeds the Fair Market Value of a Common Share at the date
of grant, the aggregate number of available Common Shares will
be automatically increased by an amount based on the following
formula:
Increase = ([M/E] - 1) x G
M = Value of the Option if it were granted at Fair Market Value
(using either a Black Sholes or Lattice Model)
E = Value of the Option at its actual Exercise Price (using
either a Black Sholes or Lattice Model)
G = Number of Options granted to Participant at above Fair
Market Value
(ii) (a) if a cap value is placed on the Option
pursuant to an Award Agreement, the aggregate number of
available Common Shares under the Plan will be automatically
increased by an amount based on the following formula:
Increase = ([M/E] - 1) x G
M = Black Sholes value of the option that is not capped at the
date of grant
E = Lattice Model value of a capped option at the date of grant
G = Number of capped options granted to the option holder
(b) If the Fair Market Value of the Common Shares on the
exercise date exceeds the cap value set forth in the Award
Agreement, the number of Common Shares to be issued to the
Participant under the Award Agreement will be reduced to ensure
that the value of each Common Share on the exercise date
received by the Participant upon exercise of the Option does not
exceed the cap value.
The grant of any Restricted Stock Units or SARs that may be
settled only in cash shall not reduce the number of Common
Shares with respect to which Awards may be granted pursuant to
the Plan.
(b) To the extent that (i) an Option expires or is
otherwise cancelled or terminated without being exercised as to
the underlying Shares, (ii) any Shares subject to any award
of Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock
Unit, or Stock Bonus are forfeited, (iii) payment for an
Option upon exercise is made with Shares owned by the Optionee
for at least six months on the date of surrender or
(iv) Shares are withheld from payment of an Award in
satisfaction of any federal, state or local tax withholding
requirements, such Shares shall again be available for issuance
in connection with future Awards granted under the Plan.
(c) The aggregate number of Shares with respect to which
Awards (including Awards payable in cash but denominated in
Common Shares, i.e., cash-settled Restricted Stock Units
or SARs) may be granted to any individual Participant during any
calendar year shall not exceed 1,500,000.
Section 5. Equitable
Adjustments.
In the event of any Change in Capitalization, an equitable
substitution or proportionate adjustment shall be made in
(i) the aggregate number
and/or kind
of common shares or other property reserved for issuance under
the Plan, (ii) the kind, number
and/or
option price of shares or other property subject to outstanding
Options and Stock Appreciation Rights granted under the Plan,
and (iii) the kind, number
and/or
purchase price of shares or other property subject to
outstanding awards of Restricted Stock, and Restricted Stock
Units granted under the Plan, in each case as may be determined
by the Administrator, in its sole discretion. Such other
equitable substitutions or adjustments shall be made as may be
determined by the Administrator, in its sole discretion. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, in connection with a
Change in Capitalization, the
A-5
Administrator may provide, in its sole discretion, for the
cancellation of any outstanding Awards in exchange for payment
in cash or other property of the Fair Market Value of the Shares
covered by such Awards reduced, in the case of Options, by the
Exercise Price thereof, and in the case of Stock Appreciation
Rights, by the grant price thereof, or by any other applicable
purchase price.
Section 6. Eligibility.
The Participants under the Plan shall be selected from time to
time by the Administrator, in its sole discretion, from among
Eligible Recipients. The Administrator shall have the authority
to grant to any Eligible Recipient Incentive Stock Options,
Nonqualified Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights,
Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, or a Stock Bonus.
Section 7. Options.
(a) General. Options may be granted
alone or in addition to other Awards granted under the Plan. Any
Option granted under the Plan shall be evidenced by an Award
Agreement in such form as the Administrator may from time to
time approve. The provisions of each Option need not be the same
with respect to each Participant. Participants who are granted
Options shall enter into an Award Agreement with the Company, in
such form as the Administrator shall determine, which Award
Agreement shall set forth, among other things, the Exercise
Price of the Option, the term of the Option and provisions
regarding exercisability of the Option granted thereunder. The
Options granted under the Plan may be of two types:
(i) Incentive Stock Options and (ii) Nonqualified
Stock Options. To the extent that any Option does not qualify as
an Incentive Stock Option, it shall constitute a separate
Nonqualified Stock Option. More than one Option may be granted
to the same Participant and be outstanding concurrently
hereunder. Options granted under the Plan shall be subject to
the terms and conditions set forth in paragraphs (b)-(i) of
this Section 7 and shall contain such additional terms and
conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, as the
Administrator shall deem desirable.
(b) Exercise Price. The per share
Exercise Price of Shares purchasable under an Option shall be
determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion at the
time of grant but shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market
Value per Share on such date (or, in the case of Incentive Stock
Options, 110% of the Fair Market Value per Share on such date
if, on such date, the Eligible Recipient owns (or is deemed to
own under the Code) stock possessing more than 10% (a Ten
Percent Owner) of the total combined voting power of all
classes of shares of the Company or its Subsidiaries).
(c) Option Term. The term of each Option
shall be fixed by the Administrator, but no Option shall be
exercisable more than ten years after the date such Option is
granted. If the Eligible Participant is a Ten Percent Owner, an
Incentive Stock Option may not be exercisable after the
expiration of five years from the date such Incentive Stock
Option is granted.
(d) Exercisability. Options shall be
exercisable at such time or times and subject to such terms and
conditions, including the attainment of preestablished
Performance Goals or other corporate or individual performance
goals, as shall be determined by the Administrator in its sole
discretion. The Administrator may also provide that any Option
shall be exercisable only in installments.
(e) Method of Exercise. Options may be
exercised in whole or in part by giving written notice of
exercise to the Company specifying the number of Shares to be
purchased, accompanied by payment in full of the aggregate
Exercise Price of the Shares so purchased in cash or its
equivalent, as determined by the Administrator. As determined by
the Administrator, in its sole discretion, payment in whole or
in part may also be made (i) by means of any properly
executed broker-assisted exercise procedure, subject to approval
by the Administrator, (ii) in the form of unrestricted
Shares already owned by the Optionee for at least six months on
the date of surrender to the extent the Shares have a Fair
Market Value on the date of surrender equal to the aggregate
option price of the Shares as to which such Option shall be
exercised, provided that, in the case of an Incentive
Stock Option, the right
A-6
to make payment in the form of already owned Shares may be
authorized only at the time of grant, or (iii) any
combination of the foregoing.
(f) Rights as Shareholder. An Optionee
shall have no rights to dividends or any other rights of a
shareholder with respect to the Shares subject to the Option
until the Optionee has given written notice of exercise, has
paid in full for such Shares, and has satisfied the requirements
of Section 15 hereof.
(g) Nontransferability of Options. The
Optionee shall not be permitted to sell, transfer, pledge or
assign any Option other than by will and the laws of descent and
distribution and all Options shall be exercisable during the
Participants lifetime only by the Participant, in each
case, except as set forth in the following two sentences. During
an Optionees lifetime, the Administrator may, in its
discretion, permit the transfer, assignment or other encumbrance
of an outstanding Option if such Option is a Nonqualified Stock
Option or an Incentive Stock Option that the Administrator and
the Participant intend to change to a Nonqualified Stock Option.
Subject to the approval of the Administrator and to any
conditions that the Administrator may prescribe, an Optionee
may, upon providing written notice to the Company, elect to
transfer any or all Options described in the preceding sentence
(i) to members of his or her Immediate Family, provided
that no such transfer by any Participant may be made in
exchange for consideration, or (ii) by instrument to an
inter vivos or testamentary trust in which the Options are to be
passed to beneficiaries upon the death of the Participant.
(h) Termination of Employment or
Service. Except as otherwise provided in an
Award Agreement, if a Participants employment with the
Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate terminates for any
reason, all outstanding Options granted to such Participant
shall expire on the date of such termination (whether or not
then vested or exercisable). Notwithstanding the foregoing, no
Option shall be exercisable after the expiration of its term.
(i) Limitation on Incentive Stock
Options. To the extent that the aggregate Fair
Market Value of Shares with respect to which Incentive Stock
Options are exercisable for the first time by an Optionee during
any calendar year under the Plan and any other stock option plan
of the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate shall exceed
$100,000, such Options shall be treated as Nonqualified Stock
Options. Such Fair Market Value shall be determined as of the
date on which each such Incentive Stock Option is granted.
Section 8. Restricted
Stock.
(a) General. Awards of Restricted Stock
may be issued either alone or in addition to other Awards
granted under the Plan and shall be evidenced by an Award
Agreement. The Administrator shall determine the Eligible
Recipients to whom, and the time or times at which, Awards of
Restricted Stock shall be made; the number of Shares to be
awarded; the price, if any, to be paid by the Participant for
the acquisition of Restricted Stock; and the Restricted Period
(as defined in Section 8(d)) applicable to awards of
Restricted Stock. The provisions of the awards of Restricted
Stock need not be the same with respect to each Participant.
(b) Purchase Price. The price per Share,
if any, that a Recipient must pay for Shares purchasable under
an award of Restricted Stock shall be determined by the
Administrator in its sole discretion at the time of grant.
(c) Awards and Certificates. The
prospective recipient of an Award of Restricted Stock shall not
have any rights with respect to any such Award, unless and until
such recipient has executed an Award Agreement evidencing the
Award and delivered a fully executed copy thereof to the
Company, within such period as the Administrator may specify
after the award date. Each Participant who is granted an award
of Restricted Stock shall be issued a share certificate in
respect of such shares of Restricted Stock, which certificate
shall be registered in the name of the Participant and shall
bear an
A-7
appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions, and
restrictions applicable to any such Award, provided that
the Company may require that the share certificates evidencing
Restricted Stock granted hereunder be held in the custody of the
Company until the restrictions thereon shall have lapsed, and
that, as a condition of any award of Restricted Stock, the
Participant shall have delivered a stock power, endorsed in
blank, relating to the Shares covered by such Award.
(d) Nontransferability. Any Award of
Restricted Stock granted pursuant to this Section 8 shall
be subject to the restrictions on transferability set forth in
this paragraph (d). During such period as may be set by the
Administrator in the Award Agreement (the Restricted
Period), the Participant shall not be permitted to sell,
transfer, pledge, hypothecate or assign Shares of Restricted
Stock awarded under the Plan except by will or the laws of
descent and distribution. The Administrator may also impose such
other restrictions and conditions, including the attainment of
preestablished Performance Goals or other corporate or
individual performance goals, on Restricted Stock as it
determines in its sole discretion. The Restricted Period shall
be not less than three years, provided that the
Restricted Period may be shorter (but not less than one year) if
vesting of the Restricted Stock is conditioned upon the
attainment of preestablished Performance Goals or other
corporate or individual performance goals. However, in no event
shall the Restricted Period end with respect to a Restricted
Stock Award prior to the satisfaction by the Participant of any
liability arising under Section 15 hereof. Any attempt to
dispose of any Restricted Stock in contravention of any such
restrictions shall be null and void and without effect.
(e) Rights as a Shareholder. Except as
provided in Section 8(c) and (d), the Participant shall
possess all incidents of ownership with respect to Shares of
Restricted Stock during the Restricted Period, including the
right to receive or reinvest dividends with respect to such
Shares (except that the Administrator may provide in its
discretion that any dividends paid in property other than cash
shall be subject to the same restrictions as those that apply to
the underlying Restricted Stock) and to vote such Shares.
Certificates for unrestricted Shares shall be delivered to the
Participant promptly after, and only after, the Restricted
Period shall expire without forfeiture in respect of such awards
of Restricted Stock except as the Administrator, in its sole
discretion, shall otherwise determine.
(f) Termination of Employment. The
rights of Participants granted an Award of Restricted Stock upon
termination of employment with the Company or any Subsidiary or
Affiliate for any reason during the Restricted Period shall be
set forth in the Award Agreement governing such Award.
Section 9. Restricted
Stock Units
(a) Vesting. At the time of the grant of
Restricted Stock Units, the Administrator may impose such
restrictions or conditions to the vesting of such Restricted
Stock Units as it, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate, to
be contained in the Award Agreement, including the attainment of
preestablished Performance Goals or other corporate or
individual performance goals. The Administrator may divide such
Restricted Stock Units into classes and assign different vesting
conditions for each class. Provided that all conditions to the
vesting of a Restricted Stock Unit are satisfied, and except as
provided in Section 9(c), upon the satisfaction of all
vesting conditions with respect to a Restricted Stock Unit, such
Restricted Stock Unit shall vest. The provisions of the awards
of Restricted Stock Units need not be the same with respect to
each Participant.
(b) Benefit Upon Vesting. Upon the
vesting of a Restricted Stock Unit, the Participant shall be
entitled to receive, within 30 days of the date on which
such Restricted Stock Unit vests, an amount in cash or, in the
Companys sole discretion, in Common Shares with a Fair
Market Value equal to the sum of (1) the Fair Market Value
of a Common Share on the date on which such Restricted Stock
Unit vests and (2) the aggregate amount of cash dividends
paid with respect to a Common Share during the period commencing
on the date on which the Restricted Stock Unit was granted and
terminating on the date on which such Share vests.
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this
A-8
Section 9, if a Restricted Stock Unit is to be settled in
Common Shares, the Restricted Stock Unit shall vest not earlier
than three years from the date of grant, provided that
the Restricted Stock Unit may vest earlier (but not less than
one year from the date of grant) if vesting of the Restricted
Stock Unit is conditioned upon the attainment of preestablished
Performance Goals or other corporate or individual performance
goals.
(c) Termination of Employment. The rights
of Participants granted a Restricted Stock Unit upon termination
of employment with the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate
for any reason before the Restricted Stock Unit vests shall be
set forth in the Award Agreement governing such Award.
|
|
Section 10.
|
Stock
Bonus Awards
|
In the event that the Administrator grants a Stock Bonus, a
certificate for the Common Shares constituting such Stock Bonus
shall be issued in the name of the Participant to whom such
grant was made and delivered to such Participant as soon as
practicable after the date on which such Stock Bonus is payable.
The Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to a Stock Bonus
shall not exceed the salary or cash bonus otherwise payable to
the Participant on the date of grant, and the Stock Bonus shall
be in lieu of an amount of the Participants salary or cash
bonus equal to such Fair Market Value.
|
|
Section 11.
|
Stock
Appreciation Rights.
|
(a) Grant of SARs. Subject to the terms
and conditions of the Plan, SARs may be granted to Participants
at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the
Administrator in its sole discretion. The Administrator may
grant Freestanding SARs, Tandem SARs, or any combination of
these forms of SAR. The Administrator in its sole discretion
shall determine the number of SARs granted to each Participant
(subject to Section 4 hereof) and, consistent with the
provisions of the Plan, the terms and conditions pertaining to
such SARs, including any conditions relating to the attainment
of preestablished Performance Goals or other corporate or
individual performance goals as may be determined by the
Administrator in its sole discretion. The provisions of the
awards of SARs need not be the same with respect to each
Participant.
(b) Grant Price. The grant price of a
Freestanding SAR shall be not less than the Fair Market Value of
a Share on the date of grant of the SAR. The grant price of
Tandem SARs shall equal the Exercise Price of the related Option.
(c) Exercise of Tandem SARs. Tandem SARs
may be exercised for all or part of the Shares subject to the
related Option upon the surrender of the right to exercise the
equivalent portion of the related Option. A Tandem SAR may be
exercised only with respect to the Shares for which its related
Option is then exercisable. Notwithstanding any other provision
of this Plan to the contrary, with respect to a Tandem SAR
granted in connection with an Incentive Stock Option:
(i) the Tandem SAR shall expire no later than the
expiration of the underlying Incentive Stock Option;
(ii) the value of the payout with respect to the Tandem SAR
may be for no more than one hundred percent (100%) of the
difference between the Exercise Price of the underlying
Incentive Stock Option and the Fair Market Value of the Shares
subject to the underlying Incentive Stock Option at the time the
Tandem SAR is exercised; and (iii) the Tandem SAR may be
exercised only when the Fair Market Value of the Shares subject
to the Incentive Stock Option exceeds the Exercise Price of the
Incentive Stock Option.
(d) Exercise of Freestanding
SARs. Freestanding SARs may be exercised upon
whatever terms and conditions the Administrator, in its sole
discretion, imposes upon them.
(e) SAR Agreement. Each SAR grant shall
be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the grant
price, the term of the SAR, and such other provisions as the
Administrator shall determine.
A-9
(f) Term of SARs. The term of an SAR
granted under the Plan shall be determined by the Administrator,
in its sole discretion; provided, however, that such term shall
not exceed ten (10) years.
(g) Payment of SAR Amount. Upon exercise
of an SAR, a Participant shall be entitled to receive payment
from the Company in an amount determined by multiplying:
(i) the difference between the Fair Market Value of a Share
on the date of exercise over the grant price; by
(ii) the number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is
exercised.
At the discretion of the Administrator, the payment upon SAR
exercise may be in cash, in Shares of equivalent value, or in
some combination thereof. The Administrators determination
regarding the form of SAR payout shall be set forth in the Award
Agreement pertaining to the grant of the SAR.
|
|
Section 12.
|
Effect of
Change in Control.
|
The Administrator in its discretion may provide that, upon the
occurrence of a change in control (as such term may be defined
in an Award Agreement) or upon termination of employment under
specified circumstances during a specified period following such
a change in control, all as specified in the applicable Award
Agreement, all outstanding Shares of Restricted Stock, and
Restricted Stock Units granted to a Participant which have not
theretofore vested shall immediately vest and all restrictions
on such Shares and Units shall immediately lapse, and each
Option and Stock Appreciation Right granted to a Participant and
outstanding at such time shall become fully and immediately
exercisable.
|
|
Section 13.
|
Amendment
and Termination.
|
(a) The Board may amend, alter or discontinue the Plan, but
(i) no amendment, alteration, or discontinuation shall be
made that would impair the rights of a Participant under any
Award theretofore granted without such Participants
consent, and (ii) any amendment shall be subject to
approval of shareholders if it (A) materially increases the
benefits accruing to Participants under the Plan,
(B) materially increases the number of Shares that may be
issued under the Plan, or (C) materially modifies the
requirements for participation in the Plan. Unless the Board
determines otherwise, the Board shall obtain approval of
shareholders of the Company for any amendment that would require
such approval in order to satisfy the requirements of
section 162(m) of the Code, section 422 of the Code,
stock exchange rules or other applicable law.
(b) The Administrator may amend the terms of any Award
theretofore granted, prospectively or retroactively, but
(i) unless approved by the shareholders of the Company, no
such amendment shall (A) accelerate the date on which any
Option or SAR granted under the Plan becomes exercisable or
(B) accelerate the lapse of restrictions, or waive any
condition imposed hereunder, with respect to any Restricted
Stock, Restricted Stock Units, or Stock Bonus, and
(ii) subject to Section 4 of Plan, no such amendment
shall impair the rights of any Participant without his or her
consent.
(c) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this
Section 13, any decrease in the Exercise Price of any
outstanding Option (whether effected by amendment to the Plan or
an Award Agreement) shall be subject to the approval of the
shareholders of the Company.
|
|
Section 14.
|
Unfunded
Status of Plan.
|
The Plan is intended to constitute an unfunded plan
for incentive compensation. With respect to any payments not yet
made to a Participant by the Company, nothing contained herein
shall give any such Participant any rights that are greater than
those of a general creditor of the Company.
A-10
|
|
Section 15.
|
Withholding
Taxes.
|
(a) Whenever cash is to be paid pursuant to an Award, the
Company (or Subsidiary or Affiliate, as the case may be) shall
have the right to deduct therefrom an amount sufficient to
satisfy any federal, state and local tax withholding
requirements related thereto. Whenever Shares are to be
delivered pursuant to an Award, the Company (or Subsidiary or
Affiliate, as the case may be) shall have the right to require
the Participant to remit to the Company (or Subsidiary or
Affiliate, as the case may be) in cash an amount sufficient to
satisfy any federal, state and local tax withholding
requirements related thereto. With the approval of the
Administrator, a Participant may satisfy the foregoing
requirement by electing to have the Company withhold from
delivery Shares or by delivering Shares already owned by the
Participant for at least six months, in each case, having a
value equal to the minimum amount of tax required to be
withheld. Such shares shall be valued at their Fair Market Value
on the date of which the amount of tax to be withheld is
determined. Fractional share amounts shall be settled in
cash. Such an election may be made with respect to all or any
portion of the shares to be delivered pursuant to an Award.
(b) If the Participant makes a disposition, within the
meaning of section 424(c) of the Code and regulations
promulgated thereunder, of any Share or Shares issued to such
Participant pursuant to such Participants exercise of an
Incentive Stock Option, and such disposition occurs within the
two-year period commencing on the day after the date of grant or
within the one-year period commencing on the day after the date
of exercise, such Participant shall, within ten (10) days
of such disposition, notify the Company (or Subsidiary or
Affiliate, as the case may be) thereof and thereafter
immediately deliver to the Company (or Subsidiary or Affiliate,
as the case may be) any amount of federal, state or local income
taxes and other amounts which the Company (or Subsidiary or
Affiliate, as the case may be) informs the Participant the
Company (or Subsidiary or Affiliate, as the case may be) is
required to withhold.
|
|
Section 16.
|
General
Provisions.
|
(a) Shares shall not be issued pursuant to the exercise of
any Award granted hereunder unless the exercise of such Award
and the issuance and delivery of such Shares pursuant thereto
shall comply with all relevant provisions of law, including,
without limitation, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the
Exchange Act and the requirements of any stock exchange upon
which the Common Shares may then be listed, and shall be further
subject to the approval of counsel for the Company with respect
to such compliance. The Company shall be under no obligation to
effect the registration pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, of any interests in the Plan or any Common Shares to
be issued hereunder or to effect similar compliance under any
state laws.
(b) All certificates for Shares delivered under the Plan
shall be subject to such stock-transfer orders and other
restrictions as the Administrator may deem advisable under the
rules, regulations, and other requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, any stock exchange upon which the Common
Shares may then be listed, and any applicable federal or state
securities law, and the Administrator may cause a legend or
legends to be placed on any such certificates to make
appropriate reference to such restrictions. The Administrator
may require, as a condition of the issuance and delivery of
certificates evidencing Shares pursuant to the terms hereof,
that the recipient of such Shares make such agreements and
representations as the Administrator, in its sole discretion,
deems necessary or desirable.
(c) Nothing contained in the Plan shall prevent the Board
from adopting other or additional compensation arrangements,
subject to shareholder approval, if such approval is required;
and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or
applicable only in specific cases. The adoption of the Plan
shall not confer upon any Eligible Recipient any right to
continued employment or service with the Company or any
Subsidiary or Affiliate, as the case may be, nor shall it
interfere in any way
A-11
with the right of the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate to
terminate the employment or service of an Eligible Recipient at
any time.
(d) No fractional Common Shares shall be issued or
delivered pursuant to the Plan. The Administrator shall
determine whether cash, other Awards, or other property shall be
issued or paid in lieu of such fractional shares or whether such
fractional shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or
otherwise eliminated.
(e) If any provision of the Plan is held to be invalid or
unenforceable, the other provisions of the Plan shall not be
affected but shall be applied as if the invalid or unenforceable
provision had not been included in the Plan.
(f) The Plan and all Awards shall be governed by the laws
of the State of Delaware without regard to its principles of
conflict of laws.
(g) Awards may be granted under the Plan from time to time
in substitution for awards held by employees, directors or
service providers of other corporations who are about to become
employees of the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate as the
result of a merger or consolidation of the employing corporation
with the Company or Subsidiary or Affiliate, or the acquisition
by the Company or a Subsidiary or Affiliate of the assets of the
employing corporation, or the acquisition by the Company or a
Subsidiary or Affiliate of the shares of the employing
corporation, as the result of which it becomes a Subsidiary or
Affiliate under the Plan. The terms and conditions of the Awards
so granted may vary from the terms and conditions set forth in
this Plan at the time of such grant as the Administrator may
deem appropriate to conform, in whole or in part, to the
provisions of the awards in substitution for which they are made.
|
|
Section 17.
|
Shareholder
Approval; Effective Date of Plan.
|
The Plan shall be effective as of the date of its approval by
the Companys shareholders.
|
|
Section 18.
|
Term of
Plan.
|
No Award shall be granted pursuant to the Plan on or after the
tenth anniversary of the date the Plan is approved by the
Companys shareholders, but Awards theretofore granted may
extend beyond that date.
A-12
PROXY
NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD.
This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
The person signing on the reverse by this proxy appoints Eugene M. Isenberg and Anthony G.
Petrello, and each of them (with full power to designate substitutes), proxies to represent, vote
and act with respect to all common shares of Nabors Industries Ltd. held of record by the
undersigned at the close of business on April 7, 2006 at Nabors annual general meeting of
shareholders to be held on June 6, 2006 and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. The
proxies may vote and act upon the matters designated below and upon such other matters as may
properly come before the meeting (including a motion to adjourn the meeting), according to the
number of votes the undersigned might cast and with all powers the undersigned would possess if
personally present.
1. |
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS: Election of one Class III director of
Nabors to serve until the 2009 annual
general meeting of shareholders or until
their respective successors are elected
and qualified.
Nominees:Eugene M. Isenberg |
|
2. |
|
APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS AND AUTHORIZATION OF AUDIT COMMITTEE TO SET
AUDITORS REMUNERATION: Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
independent auditors and to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board
of Directors to set auditors remuneration. |
|
3. |
|
MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL: Approval of the Companys
Amended and Restated 2003 Employee Stock Plan. |
YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO SPECIFY YOUR CHOICE BY MARKING THE APPROPRIATE BOX ON THE REVERSE SIDE. IF
YOU DO NOT MARK ANY BOX, YOUR SHARES WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE ABOVE-NAMED DIRECTORS
AND FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS AUDITORS AND
FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2003 EMPLOYEE STOCK PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDATIONS.
SEE REVERSE
SIDE
þ Please mark your votes as in this example.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ITEMS 1, 2, AND 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
Election of Director
Eugene Isenberg
|
|
|
|
FOR
o
|
|
WITHHELD
o
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
Appointment of
Pricewaterhouse
Coopers LLP as
independent
auditors and to
authorize the Audit
Committee of the
Board of Directors
to set auditors
remuneration.
|
|
FOR
o
|
|
AGAINST
o
|
|
ABSTAIN
o |
3.
|
|
Approval of Amended and Restated 2003 Employee Stock Plan
|
|
FOR
o
|
|
AGAINST
o
|
|
ABSTAIN
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In their discretion the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may
properly come before the meeting (including a motion to adjourn the meeting) and at any adjournment
of the meeting.
NOTE: Please mark the proxy, sign exactly as your name appears below, and return it promptly in the
enclosed addressed envelope. When shares are held by joint tenants, both parties should sign.
When signing as an attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title
as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by the President or other authorized
person. If a partnership, please sign in full partnership name by an authorized person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Date |
|
|