pre14c
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14C INFORMATION
INFORMATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(c) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Amendment
No. )
Check the appropriate box:
þ Preliminary
Information Statement
o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14c-5(d)(2))
o Definitive
Information Statement
PHI, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In
Its Charter)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
þ
|
No fee required
|
|
o
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14c-5(g)
and 0-11
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PHI, Inc.
2001 SE Evangeline Thruway
Lafayette, Louisiana 70508
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on May 6,
2008
To the Holders of Voting Common Stock of PHI, Inc.:
The 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of PHI, Inc.
(PHI) will be held at Lafayette Hilton &
Towers (Cedar Room), 1521 West Pinhook Road, Lafayette,
Louisiana, on Tuesday, May 6, 2008, at 8:00 a.m.,
local time, to:
1. Elect directors.
2. Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche as
PHIs independent registered public accounting firm for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2008.
3. Approve an amendment to Article III(A) of the
Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized
shares of non-voting common stock from 12.5 million to
25 million shares.
4. Transact such other business as may properly be brought
before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.
Holders of record of PHIs voting common stock at the close
of business on April 11, 2008 are entitled to notice of and
to vote at the meeting.
WE ARE NOT ASKING YOU FOR A PROXY AND YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT
TO SEND US A PROXY.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Michael J. McCann
Secretary
Lafayette, Louisiana
April 16, 2008
PHI, Inc.
2001 SE Evangeline Thruway
Lafayette, Louisiana 70508
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD
May 6, 2008
This Information Statement is furnished to holders of voting
common stock (Voting Stock) of PHI, Inc.
(PHI or the Company) at the direction of
its Board of Directors (the Board) in connection
with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of PHI (the
Meeting) to be held on May 6, 2008, at the time
and place set forth in the accompanying notice and at any
adjournments thereof.
Holders of record of Voting Stock at the close of business on
April 11, 2008 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the
Meeting. On that date, PHI had outstanding 2,852,616 shares
of Voting Stock, each of which is entitled to one vote, and
12,438,992 shares of non-voting common stock, none of which
are entitled to vote.
WE ARE NOT ASKING YOU FOR A PROXY AND YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT
TO SEND US A PROXY.
This Information Statement is first being mailed to stockholders
on or about April 16, 2008. The cost of preparing and
mailing the statement will be borne by PHI. Banks, brokerage
houses and other nominees or fiduciaries will be requested to
forward the material to their principals, and PHI will, upon
request, reimburse them for their expenses in so doing.
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
Our Amended and Restated By-Laws (the By-laws)
establish the number of directors constituting the Board, and to
be elected at the Meeting at six. Al A. Gonsoulin, our Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, holds more than a
majority of PHIs outstanding Voting Stock, and his vote
alone is sufficient to decide all matters to be voted on at the
Meeting. Mr. Gonsoulin has informed PHI that he intends to
vote all of his shares for (i) the election of the six
persons identified below who have been nominated to serve on our
Board; (ii) ratifying the appointment of
Deloitte & Touche as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2008; and (iii) the amendment to our articles of
incorporation increasing the authorized number of shares of
non-voting common stock. As a result, the outcome of those votes
is assured, no matter how the other holders of voting stock vote
their shares. In the unanticipated event that one or more
nominees cannot be a candidate at the Meeting, or is unwilling
to serve, the By-laws provide that the number of authorized
directors will be reduced automatically by the number of such
nominees unless the Board by a majority vote of the entire Board
selects an additional nominee.
Nomination
of Directors
The Board does not have a nominating committee or other
committee performing similar functions. The Marketplace Rules of
the NASDAQ Stock Market (NASDAQ ) provide that a
controlled company is exempt from having its
director nominees selected by a nominating committee. A
controlled company is defined, in part, as a company of which
more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual. As
Mr. Gonsoulin owns over 50% of the Companys voting
common stock, PHI is a controlled company within the
definition of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules, and the Board
believes that it is appropriate for PHI not to have a nominating
committee. The full Board does, however, approve all nominees,
and a stockholder who wishes for the Board to consider an
individual as a director nominee should communicate that desire
in writing to the Chairman of the Board at the Companys
address. Similarly, a stockholder who wishes to communicate with
the Board on any other subject should direct such communication
to the Secretary of the Company at the Companys address.
The Secretary will be responsible for disseminating all such
communications to the Board, or to a specific member of the
Board, as appropriate, depending on the facts described in such
communication.
In addition to suggesting candidates to the Board, stockholders
may nominate candidates directly by following the Board
nomination procedure set forth in the By-laws. Under this
procedure, a stockholder wishing to make a nomination must
provide written notice to the Companys Secretary
containing all information about the proposed nominee required
by Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, including his or her name, age, business and residence
address, principal occupation or employment, class and number of
shares beneficially owned and entitled to vote at the meeting,
and such nominees written consent to be named in the proxy
statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected.
Also, the stockholder must include his or her own name, address,
and class and number of shares beneficially owned and entitled
to vote at the meeting. Upon receipt of a stockholders
nomination, our Secretary will appoint two independent
inspectors to determine whether these procedures were satisfied.
To be timely, a stockholders notice must be addressed to
the Secretary, and delivered to us, or mailed and received by us
not less than 45 nor more than 90 days before the meeting.
If we provide less than 55 days notice of the meeting, that
deadline is extended until the close of business on the
10th day following the date notice was given.
Our Board identifies potential nominees for director, other than
current directors standing for re-election, through business and
other contacts. Our Board does not have a formal policy with
regard to the consideration of director candidates nominated by
our other stockholders. Our Board primarily considers a
nominees business experience, career positions held and
particular areas of expertise. There is no difference in the
manner in which the Board evaluates nominees for director based
on whether the nominee is recommended by a stockholder or by a
member of our Board.
Information
about Directors
The following table sets forth certain information as of
April 2, 2008, with respect to each candidate nominated by
the Board, and our executive officers. All director nominees
were recommended by our Chairman of the Board. Unless otherwise
indicated, each person has been engaged in the principal
occupation shown for the past five years. Our Board has
determined, using criteria established by NASDAQ and the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), that
each director nominee other than Messrs. Bospflug and
Gonsoulin is independent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
|
|
Became a
|
|
|
|
|
Director or
|
Name and Age
|
|
Principal Occupation or Position
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
Directors and Nominees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Al A. Gonsoulin, 65
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PHI(1)
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Lance F. Bospflug, 53
|
|
Self-employed(2)
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Arthur J. Breault, Jr., 68
|
|
Tax lawyer and consultant(3)
|
|
|
1999
|
|
C. Russell Luigs, 75
|
|
Consultant(4)
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Richard H. Matzke, 71
|
|
Consultant(5)
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Thomas H. Murphy, 53
|
|
Member, Murco Oil & Gas, LLC (oil & gas production and
investments)(6)
|
|
|
1999
|
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. McCann, 60
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary(7)
|
|
|
1998
|
|
Richard A. Rovinelli, 60
|
|
Chief Administrative Officer and Director of Human Resources(8)
|
|
|
1999
|
|
William P. Sorenson, 58
|
|
Director, Corporate Business Development(9)
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For more than five years, until December 31, 2001,
Mr. Gonsoulin was President of the Sea Mar division of
Nabors Industries. He acquired a controlling interest in PHI in
September 2001, and shortly thereafter became Chairman of
PHIs Board. He was appointed Chief Executive Officer of
PHI following Mr. Bospflugs resignation in May 2004. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Bospflug joined PHI in September 2000 as President and
was appointed Chief Executive Officer in August 2001.
Before joining PHI he was Chief Financial Officer, and from 1999
to 2000 Chief Executive Officer, of T.L. James &
Company, Inc., a diversified construction, marine dredging and
timber company. Mr. Bospflug resigned as President and
Chief Executive Officer of PHI in May 2004. Mr. Bospflug is
currently self-employed. |
2
|
|
|
(3) |
|
For more than 16 years until 1997, when he retired,
Mr. Breault was a partner in Deloitte & Touche
LLP, concentrating in tax matters. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Luigs retired from GlobalSantaFe, Inc. (formerly Global
Marine, Inc.) in September 2002. He was President and Chief
Executive Officer of Global Marine from the time he joined that
company in 1977 until 1998. He was also Chairman of the Board of
Global Marine from 1982 until 1999, and Chairman of the
Executive Committee of the Board of Global Marine from 1999
until its merger with Santa Fe International Corporation in
2001. He continued as a Director of GlobalSantaFe until May 2005. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Matzke retired from ChevronTexaco, Inc. in February
2002, where he had served as Vice Chairman of the Board since
January 2000 and as a member of the Board of Directors since
1997. From November 1989 through December 1999, Mr. Matzke
served as President of Chevron Overseas Petroleum Inc., where he
was responsible for directing Chevrons oil exploration and
production activities outside of North America. Mr. Matzke
was employed by Chevron Corporation and its predecessors and
affiliates from 1961 through his retirement in 2002. |
|
(6) |
|
For the last nine years, Mr. Murphy has been a member and
co-owner of Murco Oil and Gas, LLC. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. McCann has served as Chief Financial Officer since
November 1998 and our Secretary since March 2002. He previously
served as our Treasurer from November 1998 to May 2007. From
January 1998 to October 1998, he was the Chief Financial Officer
for Global Industries Ltd. and Chief Administrative Officer from
July 1996 to January 1998. Prior to that, he was Chief Financial
Officer for Sub Sea International, Inc. Mr. McCann is a
Certified Public Accountant. |
|
(8) |
|
Mr. Rovinelli joined us in February 1999 as Director of
Human Resources and became our Chief Administrative Officer in
December 1999. Mr. Rovinelli previously served as Manager,
Human Resources for Arco Alaska, Inc., Headquarters Staff
Manager, Human Resource Services, Arco Oil and Gas Company, as
well as numerous other positions within Arco. |
|
(9) |
|
Mr. Sorenson became our Director of Corporate Business
Development in April 2007. He previously served as Director of
Marketing and Planning from February 2002 to April 2007, and as
Director of International, Aeromedical, and Technical Services
from January 2001 to February 2002. He served as our Director of
Corporate Marketing/New Business from February 1999 to January
2001 after serving as General Manager of Aeromedical Services
from November 1995 to February 1999. |
Meetings
of the Board
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Board held
four meetings. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of
the aggregate number of Board and Committee meetings of which he
was a member.
The Board does not have a policy regarding Board member
attendance at the annual stockholders meeting, but such meeting
is normally held in conjunction with a regularly scheduled Board
meeting in order to make attendance at both convenient. All
Board members attended the 2007 annual meeting.
Board
Committees
Our Board has an Audit Committee, whose current members are
Messrs. Breault, Luigs, Matzke and Murphy (Chairman). This
committee, which held six meetings during 2007, is responsible
for performing the responsibilities described in the Audit
Committee Charter. Our Audit Committee charter is attached as
Exhibit A to this Information Statement.
Because PHI is a controlled company within the
definition of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules, it is not required
to have a compensation committee. Nevertheless, our Board has a
Compensation Committee, whose current members are
Messrs. Breault (Chairman), Luigs, Matzke, and Murphy. This
committee met four times during 2007. The Compensation Committee
charter was included as an appendix to the 2007 Information
Statement.
For the reasons discussed above under the caption
Nomination of Directors, the Board does not have a
nominating committee.
3
Director
Compensation
During 2007, each director other than Mr. Gonsoulin
received an annual retainer of $50,000. Additionally, each such
director received a meeting fee of $3,000 for each Board or
Committee meeting attended in person and $1,000 for each meeting
attended by telephone. Committee chairs received an additional
$1,000 per meeting. Director compensation is determined by
reviewing compensation levels at similar size companies.
The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company
to non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in Cash
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name(1)
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Lance F. Bospflug
|
|
|
87,000
|
|
|
|
87,000
|
|
Arthur J. Breault, Jr.
|
|
|
93,000
|
|
|
|
93,000
|
|
C. Russell Luigs
|
|
|
89,000
|
|
|
|
89,000
|
|
Richard H. Matzke
|
|
|
89,000
|
|
|
|
89,000
|
|
Thomas H. Murphy
|
|
|
93,000
|
|
|
|
93,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Al A. Gonsoulin, the Companys Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer is not included in this table as he is
an employee of the Company and receives no compensation for his
service as a director. |
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires our directors, executive officers and 10% of
stockholders to file with the SEC reports of ownership and
changes in ownership of our equity securities. Based solely on a
review of copies of such forms, or written representations that
no filings were required, we believe that all reports were filed
on a timely basis during fiscal 2007.
STOCK
OWNERSHIP
Stock
Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
the beneficial ownership of each class of outstanding PHI common
stock as of April 2, 2008 held by (a) each director
and nominee for director of PHI, (b) each executive officer
identified below under Named Executive Officers and
(c) all directors and executive officers of PHI as a group,
determined in accordance with
Rule 13d-3
of the SEC. Unless otherwise indicated, the securities shown are
held with sole voting and investment power, and are not pledged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
|
|
Class of PHI
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
Percent
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Ownership(1)
|
|
of Class
|
|
Directors and Nominees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Al A. Gonsoulin
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
1,500,580
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Lance F. Bospflug
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Arthur J. Breault, Jr.
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
5,957
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
C. Russell Luigs
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Richard H. Matzke
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas H. Murphy
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
|
|
Class of PHI
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
Percent
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Ownership(1)
|
|
of Class
|
|
Named Executive Officers(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. McCann
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Richard A. Rovinelli
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
William P. Sorenson
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
(9 persons)
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
1,515,580
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
131,657
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than one percent. |
|
(1) |
|
Includes shares of non-voting stock issuable upon exercise of
stock options as follows: Mr. McCann
10,000 shares. Shares subject to options currently
exercisable by a person are deemed to be outstanding for
purposes of computing the percent of class owned by such person
and by all directors and executive officers as a group, but are
not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the
individual ownership percentage of any other director or officer. |
|
(2) |
|
Information on Mr. Gonsoulins ownership is included
under Directors and Nominees above. |
Stock
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table shows the number of shares of PHI voting and
non-voting common stock beneficially owned as of April 2,
2008 by persons known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of
the outstanding shares of PHIs voting or non-voting common
stock, determined in accordance with
Rule 13d-3
of the SEC. The information in the table is based on a review of
such holders filings of Schedules 13D and 13G and
Form 13F with the SEC. Each person listed below has sole
voting and investment power with respect to the shares
beneficially owned unless otherwise stated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
|
|
Class of PHI
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
Percent
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Ownership
|
|
of Class
|
|
Al A. Gonsoulin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 S.E. Evangeline Thruway
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
1,500,580
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
%
|
Lafayette, Louisiana 70508
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Wells Fargo & Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
420 Montgomery Street
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
236,618
|
(1)
|
|
|
8.29
|
%
|
San Francisco, CA 94104
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Wells Capital Management Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525 Market Street
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
215,669
|
(2)
|
|
|
7.56
|
%
|
San Francisco, CA 94105
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525 Market Street
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
149,684
|
(3)
|
|
|
5.25
|
%
|
San Francisco, CA 94105
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
|
|
Class of PHI
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
Percent
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Ownership
|
|
of Class
|
|
St. Dennis J. Villere & Company, L.L.C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
601 Poydras St., Suite 1808
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
260,493
|
(4)
|
|
|
9.13
|
%
|
New Orleans, Louisiana 70130
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
1,516,599
|
(5)
|
|
|
12.19
|
%
|
Kensico Capital Management Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 Railroad Avenue,
2nd
Floor
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
252,326
|
|
|
|
8.85
|
%
|
Greenwich, CT 06830
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Woodbourne Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 N. Broadway, Suite 825
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
223,765
|
(6)
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
St. Louis, Missouri
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Baron Investment Funds Trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
767 Fifth Avenue
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
1,495,000
|
|
|
|
12.02
|
%
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1299 Ocean Avenue
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Santa Monica, CA 90401
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
831,809
|
|
|
|
6.69
|
%
|
Franklin Resources, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Franklin Parkway
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
95,100
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
San Mateo, CA 94403
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
839,599
|
|
|
|
6.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than five percent. |
|
(1) |
|
Wells Fargo & Company has sole voting power with
respect to 233,033 of these shares and sole investment power
with respect to 222,018 of these shares. |
|
(2) |
|
Wells Capital Management Incorporated has sole voting power with
respect to 68,749 of these shares and sole investment power with
respect to 215,669 shares. |
|
(3) |
|
Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC has sole voting power for all
shares and sole investment power with respect to
6,349 shares. |
|
(4) |
|
St. Denis J. Villere & Company has shared voting and
investment power with respect to all of these shares with its
clients as an investment advisor. |
|
(5) |
|
St. Denis J. Villere & Company has shared investment
power with respect to 1,406,199 of these shares with its clients
as investment advisor and sole investment power with respect to
the remaining 110,400 shares. |
|
(6) |
|
John D. Weil, the president, sole director and sole stockholder
of Clayton Management Company, the general partner of Woodbourne
Partners, L.P., has sole voting and investment power with
respect to these shares. |
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Compensation
Philosophy and Objectives
The objective of our executive compensation policy is to:
|
|
|
|
|
Produce long-term success for our stockholders
|
|
|
|
Align executive incentive compensation with the companys
annual and long-term goals
|
|
|
|
Provide competitive compensation and benefits to attract,
retain, and motivate top quality executives
|
6
These objectives strive to reward the achievement of goals
tailored to the executives area of responsibility and
recognizes individual leadership.
Compensation for our executive officers includes base salary, an
annual incentive bonus opportunity, and a deferred compensation
plan. The executives also participate in benefit plans generally
available to our other salaried employees, including our 401(k)
plan and health, dental, and life insurance.
Process
The executive compensation program is administered by the
Compensation Committee of the Board in accordance with the
Compensation Committees charter.
The Compensation Committee has retained FreeGulliver, LLC
(FreeGulliver) as an independent compensation
consultant regarding executive compensation matters. As an
advisor, FreeGulliver is retained directly by the Compensation
Committee. All assignments given to FreeGulliver are made by the
Compensation Committee, and the Compensation Committee has the
ability to terminate FreeGullivers services at any time.
The Compensation Committee retained FreeGulliver to provide the
following compensation consulting services on an ongoing basis:
|
|
|
|
|
Provide peer group compensation data to assist the Committee in
establishing executive compensation
|
|
|
|
Assist in the formulation of annual incentive-based awards
|
|
|
|
Make recommendations regarding competitive compensation levels
|
|
|
|
Facilitate a leadership succession process
|
The Compensation Committee relies on Watson Wyatt surveys and
peer group data for competitive compensation analysis, which is
compiled for the Compensation Committee by FreeGulliver. The
consultants at FreeGulliver provide a comparison of our
executive compensation with a peer group made up of four
companies in related industries, and a larger survey of service
companies with similar revenues, number of employees or
geographical location. The comparison also considers the scope
and nature of managerial responsibility and reporting
relationships. In the fourth quarter of each year, the
Compensation Committee reviews the comparison data and
recommends salary rates for the upcoming year. Based on this
data, the Compensation Committee established its 2007 target
salary levels at approximately the 60th percentile of
companies in these peer groups in accordance with
recommendations provided by FreeGulliver.
The Compensation Committee believes that its selected salary
target level is consistent with our philosophy of providing
compensation that is competitive with companies that could
attract our executives. The Compensation Committee also
established annual incentive bonus target opportunities,
discussed below, as a percentage of base salary.
The Compensation Committee reviews and approves all compensation
targets and payments for our executive officers. Except with
respect to his own compensation, the CEO may make adjustments to
the compensation based on an individuals performance and
contributions to the Companys performance, subject to
reporting any such adjustments to the Compensation Committee.
The compensation of the CEO is determined by the Compensation
Committee.
Elements
of Executive Compensation
Our executive total compensation is a mix of base salary, annual
incentive compensation, and employee benefits. It is the
objective of this mix of components to instill in our executives
the importance of achieving our business goals and thereby
increase stockholder value.
Salary. The salary is fixed and is
based generally upon the level of responsibility of each
executive officer and the individuals prior performance,
and is generally targeted at the 60th percentile of base
pay for peer executives at comparable companies. Base salary
also provides the foundation upon which incentive opportunities
are established. Base salaries are approved by the Committee and
after review of the studies referred to above and
7
the recommendation of FreeGulliver. The increase from 2006 to
2007 was determined by reference to market data from both the
Watson Wyatt and peer group in order to maintain base salary at
the 60th percentile level.
Annual Incentive Compensation. The
Committee approved a Senior Management Bonus Plan (the
Annual Incentive Plan or AIP) in
calendar year 2004, in which the Companys executive
officers participate. As implemented by the Committee, the
annual incentive opportunities are based on the position and
scope of responsibilities of the executive. This is used to
provide a targeted percentage of base salary that may be awarded
in the form of an incentive bonus at three levels a
threshold, a business plan, and a stretch level
based upon achieving financial targets. In 2007, the potential
award for the CEO ranged from 0% if threshold goals
were not met, to 40% for meeting threshold
objectives, to 70% for meeting business plan
objectives and 100% for meeting the stretch
objectives. The range for our other executive officers was 0% if
threshold goals were not met, 25% for
threshold objectives, 45% for business
plan objectives, and 65% for stretch
objectives.
With respect to senior management other than the CEO, the CEO
can modify the award based upon accomplishment of certain
Company financial goals as well as departmental goals and a
subjective evaluation of the individuals contributions to
the Company, subject to reporting such adjustments to the
Committee.
With respect to fiscal 2007, the threshold performance target
was not met. Nevertheless, the Committee decided to award
bonuses to the CEO and other executive officers (along with
other senior management members that participate in the plan) at
the threshold performance level (i.e. 40% of salary for the CEO
and 25% of salary for the other executive officers). In
addition, all other eligible employees received a bonus under
the Employee Incentive Bonus Plan at the threshold performance
level. In reaching this decision, the Committee primarily
considered the overall financial performance of the Company, the
fact that no incentive compensation had been paid to senior
management with respect to fiscal 2006 and the effort
contributed by senior management during the last two fiscal
years. The Committee concluded that these bonuses were
appropriate to reward and retain senior management. The CEO did
not make any adjustments to the 2007 bonus amounts for the other
executive officers.
The AIP provides that one-half of any bonus amount is paid to
the executive on or about the end of the first calendar quarter
of the calendar year following the year with respect to which
the award is determined, with the other half paid equally over
the next three years at the anniversary dates of the first
payment, assuming the executives employment continues;
provided that the executive will receive these amounts if he
dies, retires or becomes disabled.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Officers
Deferred Compensation Plan. In 2004, the
Board terminated the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(SERP), subject to compliance with any vested
rights, and PHI offered participants a substitute benefit in the
Officers Deferred Compensation Plan (the ODP) based
on the present value of the participants interest in the
SERP. Beginning in January 2006, the aggregate SERP benefit of
$2.2 million was transferred to the participants ODP
accounts and such transfer was completed by June 2006. Of this
total, the amounts related to Messrs. Gonsoulin, McCann,
Rovinelli, and Sorenson were $0, $262,000, $216,000, and
$194,000, respectively.
Certain highly compensated executives have been approved by the
Compensation Committee to participate in the ODP, which allows
the executive to tax-defer up to 25% of base salary and up to
100% of any bonuses and save those amounts for retirement. The
Company does not contribute to the ODP, and it is an unfunded,
nonqualified deferred compensation plan within the meaning of
Sections 2.01(2), 3.01(a)(3) and 401(a)(1) of ERISA. It is
maintained, interpreted and administered in accordance with Code
Section 409A and applicable regulations and rulings. A
separate account is established for each participants
deferred compensation and is deemed invested in securities
chosen by each participant from a list of available investment
choices. Accounts are periodically adjusted for gains or losses
to reflect the investment performance of the eligible securities
and any payments made to a participant under the ODP.
8
Except as otherwise provided in the ODP, the value of a
participants account is distributed at a designated future
date, or at termination of employment or retirement, in either a
single lump sum payment or in annual installments (not to exceed
twenty (20) installments), as designated by the participant.
In 2006, the Company transferred assets equal to the value of
the participants accounts and the substitute benefit from
the SERP to a Rabbi Trust established pursuant to the ODP. All
new executive deferrals are funded into the Rabbi Trust as they
are deferred.
Equity Compensation. The Company has
not issued any stock, options or other stock-based compensation
to employees since 2001 and has no current plans to do so.
Benefits. All executives are eligible
for the same insurance and welfare benefits (e.g., Medical
Insurance, Dental Insurance, 401(k), Long-term Disability, Life
and AD&D Insurance, AFLAC, etc.) as other employees in the
Company, except that a newly hired executive is credited with
having completed five years of Company service at
his/her hire
date for the purposes of calculating the amount of vacation days
credited each year.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis for the year ended
December 31, 2007 with management. Based on such reviews
and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the
Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
be included in this Information Statement on Schedule 14C.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee:
|
|
|
|
|
Arthur J. Breault, Jr. (Chair)
|
|
|
|
C. Russell Luigs
|
|
|
|
Richard H. Matzke
|
|
|
|
Thomas H. Murphy
|
9
Summary
Compensation Table for Fiscal 2007
The table below summarizes the total compensation paid to or
earned by each of our executive officers for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2007. We currently have four executive
officers. We have not entered into employment agreements with
any of our executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus(1)
|
|
Compensation(2)
|
|
Total
|
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Al. A. Gonsoulin
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
563,750
|
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
23,826
|
|
|
|
813,576
|
|
Chairman of the Board and
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
19,829
|
|
|
|
519,829
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. McCann
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
253,688
|
|
|
|
63,562
|
|
|
|
15,165
|
|
|
|
332,415
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
215,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
12,609
|
|
|
|
227,609
|
|
and Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard A. Rovinelli
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
225,500
|
|
|
|
56,500
|
|
|
|
12,905
|
|
|
|
294,905
|
|
Chief Administrative
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
199,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
15,688
|
|
|
|
215,188
|
|
Officer and Director of Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William P. Sorenson
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
214,225
|
|
|
|
53,675
|
|
|
|
12,318
|
|
|
|
280,218
|
|
Director, Corporate
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
190,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
11,793
|
|
|
|
201,793
|
|
Business Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Bonus awards made in fiscal 2007 are discussed in further detail
above under the heading Annual Incentive
Compensation. Fifty percent of the bonus has been paid and
the rest will be paid in three equal installments over the next
three years, subject to continuation of employment, or if the
executive dies, retires or is permanently disabled. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts shown in this column reflect for each named
executive officer: |
|
|
|
|
|
Matching contributions allocated by the Company to each of the
named executive officers for the 401(k) Retirement Plan.
Includes Mr. Gonsoulin $15,500; Mr. McCann $11,416;
Mr. Rovinelli $10,147; and Mr. Sorenson $9,897.
|
|
|
|
The cost to the Company of Term Life and Disability Insurance
coverage provided by the Company including the cost of Life
Insurance exceeding $50,000.
|
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non- Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Al A. Gonsoulin
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
395,500
|
|
|
|
565,000
|
|
Michael J. McCann
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
63,562
|
|
|
|
114,412
|
|
|
|
165,262
|
|
Richard A. Rovinelli
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
56,500
|
|
|
|
101,700
|
|
|
|
146,900
|
|
William P. Sorenson
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
53,675
|
|
|
|
96,615
|
|
|
|
139,555
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys Annual Incentive Bonus Plan (AIP) for
executives is based on annual performance, and estimated payouts
would be nil if performance goals are not obtained. The amounts
for the threshold, target and maximum are based on salary and
position. The applicable percentages under the plan are as
follows: Mr. Gonsoulin: 40%, 70% and 100%; and all other
Named Executive Officers: 25%, 45% and 65%. The performance
goals were not obtained for fiscal 2007 or 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts earned under the AIP in a calendar year are payable 50%
in the next year and 50% equally over the next three years,
subject to continuation of employment, or if the executive dies,
retires or is permanently disabled. |
10
Outstanding
Equity Awards at December 31, 2007
The following table contains information with respect to the
Named Executive Officers concerning unexercised options held as
of December 31, 2007. All options held are exercisable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Expiration
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
Date
|
|
Al A. Gonsoulin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Michael J. McCann
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
12.75
|
|
|
|
07/14/2009
|
|
Richard A. Rovinelli
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
William P. Sorenson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table sets forth certain information about option
exercises during fiscal 2007 for the Named Executive Officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
|
Acquired on Exercise
|
|
on Exercise
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
Al A. Gonsoulin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. McCann
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
266,896
|
|
Richard A. Rovinelli
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William P. Sorenson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
The following table describes the contributions, earnings and
balance at the end of fiscal year 2007 for each of the Named
Executive Officers under our Officer Deferred Compensation Plan.
For additional information regarding our Officer Deferred
Compensation Plan, see the heading Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan and Officers Deferred Compensation Plan
above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
Earnings in
|
|
Withdrawals/
|
|
Last Fiscal
|
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
Distributions
|
|
Year End
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)(2)(3)
|
|
Al A. Gonsoulin(1)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Michael J. McCann
|
|
|
63,422
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
22,813
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
696,545
|
|
Richard A. Rovinelli
|
|
|
59,656
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
45,891
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
752,313
|
|
W. Pete Sorenson
|
|
|
55,834
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
32,809
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
522,605
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Gonsoulin elected not to participate in the Officer
Deferred Compensation Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents amounts transferred upon termination of the SERP,
amounts of compensation deferred by the executives, and earnings
on such amounts. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes the following amounts for each of the following named
executive officers which were required to be transferred during
2006 from the terminated SERP: Mr. McCann, $262,000;
Mr. Rovinelli, $216,000; and Mr. Sorenson, $194,000. |
11
The table below shows the investment choices available under the
ODP and their annual rate of return for the calendar year 2007,
as reported by the plan investment advisor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Fund
|
|
Rate of Return
|
|
|
Name of Fund
|
|
Rate of Return
|
|
|
Allianz NFJ Div Value Fund A
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
FT Templeton Global Bond A
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
Allianz OCC Renaissance A
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
Gateway Fund Class A
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
Allianz OCC Target A
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
JHancock Classic Value A
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)%
|
Amer Euro Pacific Grth Fund A
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
|
JPMorgan Mid Cap Val A
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Amer Funds Fund Inv Fund A
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
Managers Bond Fund
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
Amer Funds Grth Fund A
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
Managers Short Dur Govt
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Amer Funds Grth Fund F
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
Oppenheimer Cmdty St TR A
|
|
|
30.2
|
%
|
Amer Funds Income Fund A
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
Oppenheimer Quest Intl Val Fund A
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
BlackRock Intl Bond A
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
PIMCO CommRealRetStrA
|
|
|
23.2
|
%
|
Calamos Growth A
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
PIMCO Low Duration A
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
Davis NY Venture A
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
PIMCO Total Ret A
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
DWS Core Fixed Income A
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
Thornburg Core Growth A
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
Eaton Vance Fltg Rt A
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
Thornburg Intl Value A
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
Fidelity Adv Short F/I T
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
UBS PACE Money Market P
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information about our common stock
that may be issued under equity compensation plans as of
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation
|
|
|
Number of Securities to be
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Plans (Excluding
|
|
|
Issued Upon Exercise of
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
Reflected in the First
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
Column)(1)
|
|
Equity compensation plans
|
|
0 (Voting)
|
|
(Voting)
|
|
116,520 (Voting)
|
approved by security holders
|
|
22,750 (Non-Voting)
|
|
12.75 (Non-Voting)
|
|
183,802 (Non-Voting)
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
0 (Voting)
|
|
(Voting)
|
|
116,520 (Voting)
|
|
|
22,750 (Non-Voting)
|
|
12.75 (Non-Voting)
|
|
183,802 (Non-Voting)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents shares of the Companys voting and non-voting
stock available for issuance under the PHI 1995 Incentive Plan.
The Company has not issued any shares, options or rights under
the PHI 1995 Incentive Plan since 2001, and has no current plans
to do so. |
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The Compensation Committee consists of Arthur J.
Breault, Jr., C. Russell Luigs, Richard H. Matzke and
Thomas H. Murphy. No member of the Compensation Committee has
ever been an officer or employee of PHI or any of our
subsidiaries. In 2007, none of our executive officers served as
a director or member of the compensation committee of another
entity, where an executive officer served as a member of our
Board or Compensation Committee.
Certain
Transactions
Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct Policy requires our
directors and executive officers to avoid any situation that
would create a conflict of interest unless approved in
accordance with the Companys Conflict of Interest Policy.
Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct Policy is available on
our website at www.phihelico.com.
We lease a facility from Mr. Al A. Gonsoulin, our Chairman
and CEO, where we perform maintenance work for a customer. The
lease rate is $4,725 per month. The building was leased for a
one-year term with four one-year options. This transaction was
reviewed and approved by our audit committee, which is our
procedure for any transaction between our Company and an
executive officer or director.
12
REPORT OF
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee of PHIs Board of Directors is composed
of four outside directors. It operates under a charter that was
revised in early 2005. The Board has made a determination that
all members of the Audit Committee satisfy the requirements of
the SEC and NASDAQ as to independence and are financially
sophisticated within the meaning of the NASDAQ rules. The Board
has also determined that it is not clear whether any member of
the Audit Committee is an audit committee financial
expert within the meaning of SEC rules, but the Board does
not believe the presence of an audit committee financial expert
is necessary in view of the overall financial sophistication of
Committee members. This is a report of the Committees
activities during 2007.
The Audit Committee reviewed in detail and discussed with
management and the independent auditors, among other things,
(i) all unaudited quarterly financial statements and all
quarterly reports filed with the SEC on
Form 10-Q;
(ii) the annual audited financial statements and the annual
report filed with the SEC on
Form 10-K;
(iii) managements quarterly and annual certifications
regarding internal control over financial reporting and the
independent auditors audit of internal control over
financial reporting, and (v) the matters required to be
discussed with the independent auditors by statement on Auditing
Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional
Standards, Vol. 1 AU section 380). The Committee also
received the written disclosures and the letter from the
independent auditors required by Independence Standards Board
Standard No. 1 (Independent Standards Board Standard
No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), and
has discussed with the independent auditors their independence.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the
Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the
audited financial statements be included in the Companys
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the 2007 fiscal year for filing with the SEC.
In accordance with the rules of the SEC, the foregoing
information is not deemed to be soliciting material,
or filed with the SEC or subject to its
Regulation 14C, other than as provided in such rules, or to
be subject to the liabilities of section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the
Company specifically requests that the information be treated as
soliciting material or specifically incorporates it by reference
into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
By the members of the Audit Committee:
Thomas H. Murphy, Chairman
Arthur J. Breault, Jr.
C. Russell Luigs
Richard H. Matzke
13
RELATIONSHIP
WITH REGISTERED INDEPENDENT
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
General
Our consolidated financial statements for 2006 and 2007 were
audited by the firm of Deloitte & Touche, LLP, which
was engaged for that purpose by the Audit Committee.
Representatives of Deloitte & Touche, LLP, are not
expected to be present at the Meeting.
The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche,
LLP as PHIs independent registered public accounting firm
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008, subject to
ratification by PHIs stockholders at the Meeting.
Fees
The following is a summary of the fees billed to PHI and its
subsidiaries by Deloitte & Touche, LLP for
professional services rendered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Fee Category
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Audit fees
|
|
$
|
786,000
|
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
$
|
961,000
|
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
Audit-Related fees
|
|
|
37,000
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total audit and audit related fees
|
|
|
823,000
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
|
|
984,000
|
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
124,790
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
All Other fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fees
|
|
$
|
947,790
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,056,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit fees include the aggregate fees billed for professional
services rendered for the audit of the Companys annual
financial statements and review of financial statements included
in the Companys
Form 10-Q,
fees for services that normally would be provided in connection
with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and
services that generally only the independent accountant
reasonably can provide. Audit related fees include employee
benefit plan audits, due diligence and accounting consultations.
Tax fees include assistance in the preparation of federal and
state tax returns and related advice regarding tax compliance.
Policy on
Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of
Independent Auditors
All audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the
independent auditors are pre-approved by PHIs Audit
Committee. These services may include audit services,
audit-related services and other services. Pre-approval is
generally provided for up to one year, and any pre-approval is
detailed as to the particular service or category of service and
is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent
auditors and management are required to periodically report to
the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by
the independent auditors in accordance with this pre-approval,
and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit
Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a
case-by-case
basis.
14
PROPOSAL TO
AMEND ARTICLE III(A) OF THE COMPANYS
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE
THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF NON-VOTING COMMON
STOCK
General
The Company is currently authorized to issue 12.5 million
shares of voting common stock, par value $.10 per share
(voting common stock), 12.5 million shares of
non-voting common stock, par value $.10 per share
(non-voting common stock) and 10 million shares
of preferred stock, no par value per share (preferred
stock). As of April 2, 2008, the Company had
12,438,992 shares of non-voting common stock issued and
outstanding and 22,750 shares reserved for issuance upon
exercise of stock options granted prior to 2002, leaving
38,258 shares of non-voting common stock available for
issuance in the future.
The board of directors proposes to amend Article III(A) of
the Companys Articles of Incorporation to increase the
number of authorized shares of non-voting common stock by
12.5 million shares to 25 million shares. The
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total
voting power of the Company is required to approve the proposal.
The text of the proposed Articles of Amendment to the
Companys Articles of Incorporation is set forth in
Appendix A to this information statement.
Purposes
and Effects of the Proposed Amendment
The board of directors has no current plans to issue any
additional shares of non-voting common stock (other than shares
reserved for issuance under outstanding stock options). The
board of directors believes that the adoption of this proposal
will enable the Company promptly and appropriately to respond to
business opportunities, such as opportunities to finance
acquisitions with non-voting common stock, to raise additional
equity capital or to declare stock splits and stock dividends.
Given the number of shares currently available for issuance, the
Company may not be able to effect these business opportunities
without first obtaining stockholder approval for an increase in
the authorized number of shares of non-voting common stock. The
cost, prior notice requirements and delay involved in obtaining
stockholder approval at the time that corporate action may
become necessary, could eliminate the opportunity to effect the
action or reduce the expected benefits
The additional shares of non-voting common stock proposed to be
authorized, together with existing authorized and unissued
shares, generally will be available for issuance without any
requirement for further stockholder approval, unless stockholder
action is required by applicable law or by the rules of The
NASDAQ Global Market or of any stock exchange on which the
Companys securities may be listed. Although the board of
directors will authorize the issuance of additional shares only
when it considers doing so to be in the best interest of
stockholders, the issuance of additional shares of non-voting
common stock may, among other things, have a dilutive effect on
earnings per share of the voting and non-voting common stock.
The Companys stockholders do not have any preemptive
rights to subscribe for additional shares of non-voting common
stock that may be issued.
The
board of directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote
FOR the proposal to amend the Companys Articles of
Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
non-voting common stock by 12.5 million shares to
25 million shares.
OTHER
MATTERS
Quorum
and Voting
The presence, in person or by proxy, of a majority of the
Companys total voting power is necessary to constitute a
quorum. Stockholders voting or abstaining from voting by proxy
on any issue will be counted as present for purposes of
constituting a quorum. If a quorum is present, the election of
directors will be determined by plurality vote. The proposal to
amend the Companys articles of incorporation to increase
the number of authorized shares of non-voting common stock will
require the approval of the holders of a majority of the
Companys total
15
voting power. The proposal to ratify the appointment of our
independent registered public accounting firm will require
approval of holders of a majority of the Companys total
voting power.
The Board does not know of any matters to be presented at the
Meeting other than those described herein.
Stockholder
Proposals
Eligible stockholders who desire to present a proposal qualified
for inclusion in the proxy or information materials relating to
the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders must forward such
proposal to the Companys Secretary at the address set
forth on the first page of this Information Statement in time to
arrive at PHI before February 15, 2009.
The Companys by-laws state that for any business to be
properly brought before the annual meeting, notice of the
proposal must be received by the Company no later than the close
of business on the 60th day nor earlier than the close of
business on the 90th day before the first anniversary of
the preceding years annual meeting. In regard to the 2009
annual meeting, this provision will require notice between
February 5, 2009 and March 7, 2009. If, however, the
date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or
more than 60 days after such anniversary date, notice by
the stockholders to be timely must be so delivered not earlier
than the close of business on the 90th day before such
annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the
later of the 60th day before such annual meeting or the
10th day following the day on which public announcement of
the date of such meeting is first made by the Company.
This notice must set forth (a) a brief description of the
business desired to be brought before the meeting, the reasons
for conducting such business at the meeting and any material
interest in such business of such stockholders and the
beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made;
and (b) as to the stockholders giving the notice and the
beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made
(i) the name and address of such stockholders, as they
appear on the Companys books, and of such beneficial owner
and (ii) the class and number of shares of the Company
which are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholders
and such beneficial owner.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Michael J. McCann
Secretary
Lafayette, Louisiana
April 16, 2008
16
APPENDIX A
ARTICLES OF
AMENDMENT
TO THE
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
PHI, INC.
PHI, Inc., a Louisiana corporation (the
Corporation), acting through the undersigned
officer, does hereby certify that:
FIRST: On May 6, 2008, at the annual
meeting of stockholders at which
of the 12.5 million shares of voting common stock, par
value $.10 per share, of the Corporation (Voting Common
Stock), having one vote per share, were present or
represented at the meeting, the holders of a majority of the
total voting power of the Corporation, by a vote of
shares
of Voting Common Stock for,
shares
against and
shares
abstaining, adopted a resolution to amend the Articles of
Incorporation of the Corporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of Non-Voting Common Stock from
12.5 million to 25 million shares.
SECOND: Article III(A) of the Articles of
Incorporation is amended to read in its entirety as follows:
A. The Corporation is authorized to issue
12,500,000 shares of voting common stock, par value $.10
per share (the Voting Common Stock),
25,000,000 shares of non-voting common stock, par value
$.10 per share (the Non-Voting Common Stock), and
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value per
share (the Preferred Stock).
These Articles of Amendment are dated
May , 2008.
PHI, INC.
Michael J. McCann, Secretary
A-1
EXHIBIT A
PHI,
INC.
Charter of the Audit Committee
(as
amended on March 8, 2005)
A. The Audit Committee of PHI, Inc. (the
Company) shall be comprised of at least three
directors who shall (i) be independent within the meaning
of applicable rules of the NASDAQ and the Securities and
Exchange Commission and (ii) otherwise meet the
requirements for membership on the Audit Committee as set forth
in such rules.
A. The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to
(a) assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its
oversight of (i) the integrity of the Companys
financial statements, (ii) the Companys compliance
with legal and regulatory requirements, (iii) the
Companys independent auditors qualifications and
independence, (iv) the performance of the Companys
internal audit function and internal auditors and (v) the
accounting, financial reporting and internal controls processes
of the Company; and (b) prepare any reports required to be
included in the Companys annual information statement and
as otherwise required.
B. The function of the Audit Committee is oversight. The
management of the Company is responsible for the preparation,
presentation and integrity of the Companys financial
statements and for the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting. Management and the internal auditing
department are responsible for maintaining appropriate
accounting and financial reporting principles and policies and
internal controls and procedures that provide for compliance
with applicable accounting standards, laws and regulations. The
independent auditors are responsible for planning and carrying
out a proper audit of the Companys annual financial
statements, reviews of the Companys quarterly financial
statements prior to the filing of each quarterly report on Form
10-Q,
annually attesting to and reporting on managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, and other procedures. In fulfilling their
responsibilities hereunder, it is recognized that members of the
Audit Committee are not full-time employees of the Company and
are not, and do not represent themselves to be, performing the
functions of auditors or accountants. As such, it is not the
duty or responsibility of the Audit Committee or its members to
conduct field work or other types of auditing or
accounting reviews or procedures or to set auditor independence
standards.
C. The independent auditors shall submit to the Audit
Committee annually a formal statement (the Auditors
Statement) describing: (1) the auditors
internal quality-control procedures; (2) any material
issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review
or peer review of the auditors, or by any inquiry or
investigation by governmental or professional authorities,
within the preceding five years, respecting one or more
independent audits carried out by the auditors, and any steps
taken to deal with any such issues; and (3) all
relationships between the independent auditors and the Company,
consistent with Independence Standards Board No. 1.
D. The independent auditors shall submit to the Audit
Committee annually a formal statement of the fees billed in each
of the last two fiscal years for each of the following
categories of services rendered by the independent auditors:
(1) the audit of the Companys annual financial
statements and the reviews of the financial statements included
in the Companys Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
or services that are normally provided by the independent
auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings;
(2) services not included in clause (1) that are
reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of
the Companys financial statements, quantified in the
aggregate and by each type of service; (3) tax compliance,
tax advice and tax planning services, quantified in the
aggregate and by each type of service; and (4) all other
products and services rendered by the independent auditors,
quantified in the aggregate and by each type of service.
Exhibit A-1
III.
Committee Duties and Responsibilities
To carry out its purposes, the Audit Committee shall have the
following duties and responsibilities:
A. with respect to the independent auditors:
1. to be directly responsible for the appointment,
compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the
independent auditors, who shall report directly to the Audit
Committee;
2. to resolve any disagreements with management regarding
financial reporting;
3. to actively engage in a dialogue with the independent
auditors with respect to any disclosed relationships or services
that may affect the objectivity and independence of the auditors
and to take, or recommend that the full Board take, appropriate
action to oversee the independence of the outside auditors;
4. to be directly responsible for the appointment,
compensation, retention and oversight of the work of any other
registered public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of
preparing or issuing an audit report or to perform audit, review
or attestation services, which firm shall also report directly
to the Audit Committee;
5. to pre-approve, and to adopt appropriate procedures to
pre-approve, all audit and non-audit services to be provided by
the independent auditors;
6. to ensure that the independent auditors prepare and
deliver annually an Auditors Statement, and to discuss
with the independent auditors any relationships or services
disclosed in this Statement that may impact the quality of audit
services or the objectivity and independence of the
Companys independent auditors;
7. to hold timely discussions with the independent auditors
regarding all critical accounting policies and practices used,
all alternative treatments of financial information within
generally accepted accounting principles that have been
discussed with management, the ramifications of the use of such
alternative disclosures and treatments, and the treatment
preferred by the independent auditors;
8. to obtain and discuss any material written
communications between the independent auditors and management,
such as any letter describing significant deficiencies or
material weaknesses in internal controls, any
management letter or any schedule of unadjusted
differences;
9. to discuss with management the timing and process for
implementing the rotation of the lead audit partner and any
other active audit engagement team partner; and
10. to obtain from the independent auditors assurance that
the audit was conducted in a manner consistent with
Section 10A of the Exchange Act, which sets forth certain
procedures to be followed in any audit of financial statements
required under the Exchange Act.
B. with respect to the internal auditing department, to
review the appointment and replacement of the director of the
internal auditing department, who shall report directly to the
Audit Committee but shall also be given managerial
responsibility and oversight by the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, and to review the activities and scope of work of
the internal audit department at least annually;
C. with respect to accounting principles and policies,
financial reporting and internal control over financial
reporting:
1. to consider any reports or communications (and
managements
and/or the
internal audit departments responses thereto) submitted to
the Audit Committee by the independent auditors required by or
referred to in SAS 61, as it may be modified or supplemented, or
other professional standards;
2. to meet with management, the independent auditors and,
if appropriate, the director of the internal auditing department:
i. to discuss the scope of the annual audit;
Exhibit A-2
ii. to discuss the annual audited financial statements and
quarterly financial statements, including the Companys
disclosures under Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and
all Section 302 and 906 certifications required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley);
iii. to discuss any significant matters arising from any
audit, including any audit problems or difficulties, whether
raised by management, the internal auditing department or the
independent auditors, relating to the Companys financial
statements;
iv. to discuss any difficulties the independent auditors
encountered in the course of the audit, including any
restrictions on their activities or access to requested
information and any significant disagreements with management;
v. to discuss any management or internal
control letter issued, or proposed to be issued, by the
independent auditors to the Company;
vi. to review management reporting on internal controls and
the independent auditors attestation as required by
Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley; and
vii. to discuss, as appropriate: (a) any major issues
regarding accounting principles and financial statement
presentations, including any significant changes in the
Companys selection or application of accounting
principles, and major issues as to the adequacy of the
Companys internal controls and any special audit steps
adopted in light of material control deficiencies;
(b) analyses prepared by management
and/or the
independent auditors setting forth significant financial
reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the
preparation of the financial statements, including analyses of
the effects of alternative GAAP methods on the financial
statements; and (c) the effect of regulatory and accounting
initiatives, as well as off-balance sheet structures, on the
financial statements of the Company;
3. to inquire of the Companys chief executive officer
and chief financial officer as to the existence of any
significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting that are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information,
and as to the existence of any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting;
4. to discuss guidelines and policies governing the process
by which senior management of the Company and the relevant
departments of the Company assess and manage the Companys
exposure to risk, and to discuss the Companys major
financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to
monitor and control such exposures;
5. to discuss with the Companys management and
outside counsel any significant legal, compliance or regulatory
matters that may have a material effect on the financial
statements or the Companys business, financial statements
or compliance policies, including material notices to or
inquiries received from governmental agencies;
6. to discuss and review the type and presentation of
information to be included in earnings press releases;
7. to review and discuss any reports concerning material
violations submitted to it by Company attorneys or outside
counsel pursuant to the SEC attorney professional responsibility
rules (17 C.F.R. Part 205) or
otherwise; and
8. to review and approve all related party transactions of
the Company, defined as those transactions required to be
disclosed under Item 404 of
Regulation S-K;
Exhibit A-3
D. with respect to reporting and recommendations:
1. to prepare any report or other disclosures, including
any recommendation of the Audit Committee, required by the rules
of the SEC to be included in the Companys annual proxy
statement;
2. to review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter at
least annually and recommend any changes to the full Board of
Directors; and
3. to report its activities to the full Board of Directors
on a regular basis and to make such recommendations with respect
to the above and other matters as the Audit Committee may deem
necessary or appropriate.
|
|
IV.
|
Committee
Structure and Operations
|
The Audit Committee shall designate one member of the Audit
Committee as its chairperson. The Audit Committee shall meet
once every fiscal quarter, or more frequently if circumstances
dictate; should meet separately at least quarterly with
management, the director of the internal auditing department and
the independent auditors to discuss any matters that the Audit
Committee or any of these persons or firms believe should be
discussed privately; and should meet without management present
at least once a year. The Audit Committee may request any
officer or employee of the Company or the Companys outside
counsel or independent auditors to attend a meeting of the Audit
Committee or to meet with any members of, or consultants to, the
Audit Committee.
|
|
V.
|
Delegation
to Subcommittee
|
The Audit Committee may, in its discretion, delegate all or a
portion of its duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee of
the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may, in its discretion,
delegate to one or more of its members the authority to
pre-approve any audit or non-audit services to be performed by
the independent auditors, provided that any such approvals are
presented to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
|
|
VI.
|
Resources
and Authority of the Audit Committee
|
A. The Audit Committee shall have the resources and
authority appropriate to discharge its duties and
responsibilities, including the authority to select, retain,
terminate, and approve the fees and other retention terms of
special or independent counsel, accountants or other experts and
advisors, as it deems necessary or appropriate, without seeking
approval of the Board or management.
B. The Company shall provide for appropriate funding, as
determined by the Audit Committee, in its capacity as a
committee of the Board, for payment of:
1. compensation to the independent auditors and any other
public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or
issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or
attest services for the Company;
2. compensation of any advisers employed by the Audit
Committee; and
3. ordinary administrative expenses of the Audit Committee
that are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties.
Exhibit A-4