e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number:
000-26659
Homestore, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
95-4438337
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
30700 Russell Ranch Road
Westlake Village, California
|
|
91362
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(805) 557-2300
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
None
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
Warrants to purchase Common Stock, par value $.001 per
share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated
Filer o Accelerated
Filer þ Non-Accelerated
Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate market value of voting
common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of
June 30, 2005*
|
|
$
|
252,750,921
|
|
Number of shares of common stock
outstanding as of February 28, 2006
|
|
|
149,376,914
|
|
|
|
* |
Based on the closing price of the common stock of $2.03 per
share on that date, as reported on The NASDAQ National Market
and, for purposes of this computation only, the assumption that
all of the registrants directors, executive officers and
beneficial owners of 10% or more of the registrants common
stock are affiliates.
|
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
In accordance with General Instruction G(3) to
Form 10-K,
certain information in the registrants definitive proxy
statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission relating to the registrants 2006 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders is incorporated by reference into Part III.
HOMESTORE,
INC.
FORM 10-K
For the
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005
INDEX
1
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and the documents incorporated herein by reference contain
forward-looking statements based on our current expectations,
estimates and projections about our industry, beliefs, and
certain assumptions made by us. Words such as
believes, anticipates,
estimates, expects,
projections, may, potential,
plan, continue and words of similar
import constitute forward-looking statements. The
forward-looking statements contained in this report involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that
may cause our actual results to be materially different from
those expressed or implied by these statements. These factors
include those listed under Risk Factors,
Business, and elsewhere in this
Form 10-K,
and the other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or SEC, including our reports on
Form 8-K
and
Form 10-Q,
and any amendments thereto. Other unknown or unpredictable
factors also could have material adverse effects on our future
results. The forward-looking statements included in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
are made only as of the date of this Annual Report. We cannot
guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance
on these forward-looking statements. Finally, we expressly
disclaim any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking
statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
2
PART I
Homestore, Inc. (Homestore or we) has
created an online service that enables consumers to find real
estate listings and other content related to residential real
estate, moving and relocation. Our web sites collectively have
become the leading consumer destination on the Internet for home
and real estate-related information, based on number of
visitors, time spent on our web sites and number of property
listings. We generate most of our revenue from selling
advertising and marketing solutions to both real estate industry
participants, including real estate agents, homebuilders and
rental property owners, and other local and national advertisers
interested in reaching our consumer audience before, during or
after a move. We also provide software solutions to real estate
agents to assist them in managing their client interactions and
we sell architects home plans to consumers considering
building a new home. We have announced our intention to change
our name to Move, Inc., subject to approval by our shareholders
at the next annual meeting.
Our primary consumer web sites include
REALTOR.com®,
the official site of the National Association of Realtors (the
NAR);
HomeBuilder.com®,
the official new home listing site of the National Association
of Homebuilders (the NAHB);
RENTNET®,
an apartment, corporate housing and self-storage resource;
SeniorHousingNettm.com,
a comprehensive resource for seniors; and
Homestore.com®,
a home information resource site with an emphasis on content
related to mortgage financing, moving and storage, and home and
garden activities. During the second quarter of 2006, we intend
to launch
Move.comtm
as a real estate listing and move-related search site. Shortly
after its launch,
Move.comtm
will replace
HomeBuilder.com®,
RENTNET®
and
Homestore.com®
and we will begin promoting those web sites under the MOVE brand.
The market opportunity for advertising and marketing solutions
reaching consumers during their move cycle is very large. Real
estate professionals currently spend approximately
$9 billion per year on marketing their products and
services to apartment hunters, home buyers and home sellers.
Other advertisers spend in excess of $11 billion per year
seeking to promote their services or products to consumers
during the move cycle. Historically, these advertisers have
chosen traditional methods of marketing to pre- and post-move
consumers including classified and display advertisements in
newspapers and other publications, direct mail, and billboards
and other signage. These methods do not allow for interactivity
and may use data that is incomplete or outdated. Additionally,
these methods reach consumers only within specific local markets
and are often distributed on a weekly or less frequent basis.
Consumers have embraced the Internet as an essential resource in
their home search and moving process, perhaps in response to the
inherent limitations in presenting real estate and other
move-related advertising in print. According to the NAR, more
than 77% of recent home buyers utilize the Internet in their
home search. The Internet overcomes many of the limitations of
traditional offline marketing by providing consumers with access
to detailed, searchable information that is frequently updated.
Despite the migration of move-oriented consumers to the
Internet, to date, very little of the annual advertising
spending that we identify as our market opportunity has actually
moved from traditional advertising venues to the Internet.
There are several factors that we believe will accelerate the
shift of advertising spending away from traditional media toward
online resources such as our sites. First, less robust selling
conditions may encourage real estate professionals to modify
their historical marketing practices. Second, we expect the
products we have recently announced to provide advertisers more
flexibility in choosing how to promote their listings or their
business. In addition, we expect the products we have recently
announced to better align our revenue opportunity with
performance of our advertising solutions. Finally, the
maturation of the online marketing industry has introduced new
participants to our prospective customers, serving to increase
overall awareness of the efficacy of online marketing.
We have made substantial investments in our business in recent
years in order to improve our ability to bring consumers and
advertisers together. As a result of our greater understanding
of both consumer and customer needs, we have concluded that we
need to demonstrate strong capabilities in four core areas: size
and quality of consumer audience, depth and breadth of content,
enduring industry relationships and scalable business models. We
recently
3
announced significant changes to our branding, product and
pricing strategies to better align our solutions with these core
competencies. These new strategies include:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating branding under the
REALTOR.com®,
Move.comtm
and Welcome
Wagon®
brands to allow us to enhance consumer awareness of our services
and prevent us from being as dependent on third parties for
traffic to our sites.
|
|
|
|
Introducing vertical search technologies to our new home and
apartment listing search results to provide consumers with
substantially more selection.
|
|
|
|
Adding community and user-generated content to
REALTOR.com®
to provide additional content for consumers, which we believe
will provide a contextually relevant online venue to introduce
non-real estate advertisers, and enable
REALTORS®
to further differentiate their local market expertise.
|
|
|
|
Introducing
cost-per-click
(performance-based) advertising to our sites to enable better
monetization of site activity for ourselves and for a growing
number of traffic partners.
|
|
|
|
Integrating Welcome
Wagon®
offerings into
REALTOR.com®
in two ways. First, we will enable
REALTORS®
to offer a co-branded version of our new mover gift directly to
consumers earlier in the move cycle. Second, we will integrate
Welcome
Wagon®s
Local Business Directory into new community pages within
REALTOR.com®
to increase consumer awareness of special offers available to
movers through Welcome
Wagon®.
|
|
|
|
Integrating the acquisition of Moving.com, which is discussed
below, to extend our consumer tools to include access to moving,
self-storage and truck rental price quotes from qualified
professionals.
|
To better reflect the way we are managing our business, we have
revised our reporting business segments to include these two
segments: Real Estate Services for our advertising and software
solutions offered to real estate industry professionals trying
to reach prospective movers and manage those client
relationships; and Move-Related Services for our advertising
products and lead-generation solutions offered to non-real
estate advertisers trying to reach consumers at any stage of the
move cycle.
We were incorporated in the State of Delaware in 1993 under the
name of InfoTouch Corporation, or InfoTouch. In February 1999,
we changed our corporate name to Homestore.com, Inc. In May
2002, we changed our name to Homestore, Inc. We have announced
our intention to change our name to Move, Inc., subject to
approval by our shareholders at the next annual meeting. See
Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a
further description of our history. Our corporate headquarters
are in Westlake Village, California.
Our
Operating Segments
In the fourth quarter of 2005, we realigned our business to
ensure that each of our products and services directly support
our new strategy and our target markets. We now operate under
two business segments: Real Estate Services and Move-Related
Services, which for the year ended December 31, 2005
represented approximately 72% and 28% of our revenue,
respectively.
Real Estate Services. Real Estate Services
consists of products and services that promote and connect real
estate professionals to consumers through our
REALTOR.com®,
HomeBuilder.com®,
RENTNET®
and
SeniorHousingNettm.com
web sites, in addition to our customer relationship management
applications for
REALTORS®
offered through our Top
Producer®
business. Our revenue is derived from a variety of advertising
and software services, including enhanced listings, company and
property display advertising, customer relationship management
applications and web site sales. These solutions have
traditionally been offered on a subscription basis.
Move-Related Services. Move-Related Services
consists of advertising products and lead generation tools
including display, text-link and rich media advertising
positions, directory products, price quote tools and content
sponsorships on
Homestore.com®
and other related sites. In addition, it includes our Welcome
Wagon®
new-mover
4
direct mail advertising products and sales of new home plans and
related magazines through our Homestore Plans and Publications
business.
Key
Characteristics
We believe there are several characteristics of our business
that help distinguish Homestore from other real estate media and
technology companies. These characteristics include the size and
quality of our consumer audience traffic, the comprehensive
content we offer on our web sites, the strength and depth of our
real estate industry relationships, and the scalability of our
business models.
Size
and Quality of Consumer
Audience Traffic
Collectively, the Homestore network of web sites attracts
approximately 9.3 million unique users per month, according
to January 2006 data obtained from third-party Internet traffic
auditor, comScore Media Metrix. The typical visitor to the
Homestore network visits us more than two times per month and
spends approximately 29 minutes per month on our sites.
Individually,
REALTOR.com®,
our flagship site, is the Internets No. 1 real estate
site with approximately 6.3 million unique users recorded
in January 2006, according to comScore.
REALTOR.com®
visitors spend a great deal of time browsing home
listings approximately 36 minutes per unique
user in a typical month.
HomeBuilder.com®
is one of the leading Internet destinations for gathering
information and contacting homebuilders related to newly
constructed and to-be-built homes, having attracted
approximately 690,000 unique users in January 2006.
RENTNET®
is a leading apartment web site, having attracted approximately
2.1 million unique users in January 2006.
Homestore.com®,
which comprises all of our consumer traffic not directed to one
of our three largest property sites, attracted approximately
1.8 million unique users in January 2006.
We are the exclusive provider of
REALTOR®
represented existing homes, new homes and apartment listings
across America Online, including AOL, AOL.com, Netscape,
CompuServe and AOL City Guide, The Microsoft Network, or MSN,
and a provider of new homes and apartment listings on YAHOO!.
Other significant portal relationships for the Homestore network
include The IAC Network, Inc., including Excite.com and
iWon.com, Internet Broadcast Systems, Inc. and its web sites for
61 local and network-affiliated TV stations, and United Online
through its NetZero and Juno brands.
Content
REALTOR.com®.
The
REALTOR.com®
web site offers consumers a comprehensive suite of services,
tools and content for all aspects of the residential real estate
transaction. The
REALTOR.com®
web site includes a directory of approximately 1.2 million
REALTORS®
to help guide buyers and sellers through the real estate
transaction process. For buyers, there is a searchable database
of approximately 2.7 million existing homes for sale. For
sellers, there are tools and information about understanding the
value of their home, preparing the home for sale, listing and
advertising the home and completing the sale. We receive listing
content from almost 900 Multiple Listing Systems
(MLSs) across the United States. Our property
listings typically provide information that is more detailed and
timely than the information included in other media channels,
such as newspaper classified advertisements and print magazines.
In addition, we offer consumers information and tools on
mortgages, home affordability, the offer process, applying for a
loan, closing the purchase, planning the move and neighborhood
profiles.
HomeBuilder.com®. The
HomeBuilder.com®
web site currently offers consumers a resource for information
on builders as well as information on newly built homes and
housing plans. We aggregate information on new and model homes
for sale throughout more than 6,500 new home communities and
planned developments throughout the United States. Home buyers
can browse through our database under three types of search
queries: new homes, builders and manufactured homes. In addition
to offering this information, we also provide consumers with
community profiles and the ability to send detailed requests to
builders via electronic mail, telephone or fax for further
information on particular properties. With the launch of
Move.comtm
in the second quarter of 2006, we expect to significantly
increase the new home content we offer to consumers.
5
RENTNET®. The
RENTNET®
web site currently provides consumers with a large and
comprehensive rental housing database. As of December 31,
2005, our rental housing database consisted of more than 35,000
properties. Our database also includes corporate housing and
self storage listings. We also provide consumers with
information relating to moving services, renters insurance
and neighborhood profiles. Additionally, consumers can create
personalized moving checklists and receive email reminders. With
the launch of
Move.comtm
in the second quarter of 2006, we expect to significantly
increase the rental-related content we offer to consumers.
SeniorHousingNettm.com. Our
Senior Housing web site offers a database of senior housing
listings, independent living, assisted living, nursing homes,
continuing care and alzheimers care. The channel also
contains content, tools and guides to assist users in selecting
suitable housing and care types, together with information on
health and wellness.
Homestore.com®. As
a complete home-information resource,
Homestore.com®
offers a wide range of content on a variety of home related
topics including mortgage financing, moving, and home and
garden. The site utilizes content prepared by our in-house
editorial staff as well as information obtained and displayed
through third-party relationships. The
Homestore.com®
site is organized into three primary channels:
|
|
|
|
|
Homestore Home Finance. Our Home Finance
channel contains information and decision support tools that
help consumers understand and satisfy their home financing and
mortgage needs. A variety of content, tools, and interactive
guides are available to help consumers with mortgages, loans,
credit, insurance, legal matters and taxes. Additionally,
consumers have access to our Find a Lender
directory, which provides access to a variety of lending
professionals.
|
|
|
|
Homestore Moving. Our Moving channel contains
content, tools and interactive guides for consumers moving to
new homes or relocating to another community. We also offer a
database of self-serve storage locations across the country.
These resources provide movers with custom moving quotes and
other resources necessary for making moving decisions, such as
salary calculators, school reports and neighborhood information.
|
|
|
|
Homestore Home & Garden. Our
Home & Garden channel is an online resource for
consumers seeking to make improvements to their existing home,
including remodeling, home improvement, landscaping and home
maintenance needs. It provides an online resource for consumers
seeking decorating ideas and information. The channel includes
information for planning, budgeting and visualizing options, as
well as specific advice on a
room-by-room
basis. The channel is designed to help consumers locate
qualified professionals as well as provide them with
do-it-yourself information.
|
During the second quarter of 2006, we intend to launch
Move.comtm
as a real estate listing and move-related search site. Shortly
after its launch,
Move.comtm
will replace
HomeBuilder.com®,
RENTNET®
and
Homestore.com®
and we will begin promoting those under the MOVE brand.
Industry
Relationships
To provide consumers with timely and comprehensive real estate
listings, access to real estate professionals and other home and
real estate-related information and resources, we have
established relationships with key industry participants. These
participants include real estate market leaders such as the NAR;
the NAHB; hundreds of MLSs; the Manufactured Housing
Institute, the MHI; and leading real estate franchisors,
including the six largest franchises, brokers, builders and
apartment owners and managers. Under our agreement with NAR, we
operate NARs official web site,
REALTOR.com®.
Under our agreement with NAHB, we operate NAHBs official
web site,
HomeBuilder.com®.
Under our agreements with NAR, NAHB, and MHI we receive
preferential promotion in their marketing activities.
REALTOR®
is a registered collective membership mark which may be used
only by real estate professionals who are members of NAR and
subscribe to its code of ethics.
National Association of
REALTORS®. The
NAR is the largest trade association in the United States that
represents real estate professionals. NAR consists of
residential and commercial real estate professionals, including
brokers, agents, property managers, appraisers, counselors and
others engaged in all aspects of the real estate industry. NAR
had approximately 1.2 million members as of
December 31, 2005.
6
National Association of HomeBuilders. The NAHB
is the second-largest real estate trade association in the
United States. As of December 31, 2005, NAHB had
approximately 225,000 members. Approximately one-third of
NAHBs members are homebuilders
and/or
remodelers and the remainder work in closely related fields
within the residential real estate industry such as mortgage,
finance, building products and building services, including
subcontractors.
Manufactured Housing Institute. The MHI is a
nonprofit national trade association representing all segments
of the manufactured and modular housing industries, including
manufactured home producers, retailers, developers, community
owners and managers, suppliers, insurers and financial service
providers. As of December 31, 2005, the MHI had
approximately 315 corporate members, and 53 state and
regional associated members.
Multiple Listing Services. MLSs operate
networks that provide real estate professionals with listings of
properties for sale and are typically regulated by a governing
body of local brokers
and/or
agents. There are approximately 900 MLSs nationwide that
aggregate local property listings by geographic location.
Scalable
Business Models
Most of our revenue is derived from subscription-based services
that allow our customers to easily budget for our services.
These subscriptions typically have one year terms. Although we
have been able to achieve price increases in recent years for
many of our subscription products, the impact on our revenue is
only gradually recognized after all customers renew their
contracts over the course of a year. With the proliferation and
general acceptance of many types of performance-based pricing
for online marketing business models, including
cost-per-lead,
cost-per-click
and cost-per acquired customer, we are in the process of
broadening our offerings to include more performance-based
solutions.
When we introduce our new
Move.comtm
web site and its vertical search capability, we expect to
provide Featured Listings and text-based advertising on a
cost-per-click
basis. These new advertising solutions will appear on both
Move.comtm
and
REALTOR.com®.
The recently launched Top
Marketertm
lead generation product for real estate agents and the recently
acquired Moving.com business, which includes
cost-per-lead
solutions for moving quotes, truck rentals and self-storage
facilities, will also increase the range of pricing alternatives
available to our customers. In some instances, these new pricing
solutions will allow us to establish competitive bidding for a
particular placement. Performance-based advertising and
marketing solutions also increase our flexibility in structuring
relationships with potential distribution providers because they
provide a more transparent means for compensating these partners
for their traffic.
Even with these new pricing models available, we still expect a
majority of our revenue to be derived from subscription based
products. See Note 12, Segment Information, to
our Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8
of this
Form 10-K
for financial information by segment. Our sales force consists
of a combination of internal phone-based associates and field
sales personnel.
Products
and Services
Real
Estate Services Segment
Our Real Estate Services segment provides marketing and web site
solutions that allow real estate professionals to reach and
connect with a highly targeted potential customer audience
represented by the consumer traffic on our web sites. We do this
by allowing our customers to personalize the personal, corporate
and property listing information contained on our web sites and
by allowing our customers to connect their personal or corporate
web site directly to our database of property information, our
professional directories and to traditional Internet advertising
products such as banner ads.
Our services enable real estate professionals to manage their
online content and branding presence through a personal or
corporate web site, and to use our listing enhancements such as
multiple photos, virtual tours and printable brochures. We also
enable real estate professionals to market themselves and their
properties directly to potential buyers whose search criteria
match a set of listing criteria specified by the real estate
professional. We also design, host, and maintain personal and
corporate web sites for real estate professionals.
7
Because of our focus on home and real estate-related
information, we believe our web sites draw an attractive
national target audience for advertisers and providers of
home-related products and services. The vertical search
capability that we expect to launch in the new home and rental
categories should allow us to improve the consumer experience
and lead to an expanded audience.
In the second quarter of 2006, we plan to change our service
offering to other real estate professionals, principally
homebuilders and rental property owners. Prior to this change,
our
HomeBuilder.com®
and
RENTNET®
web sites included only content that was paid for by our
customers. In some markets this led to a poor consumer
experience as there was limited content on our site relative to
all the offerings in that particular market. The number of
competitors fighting for the same customer on a paid
inclusion basis made it virtually impossible for a
consumer to go to any single web site and see all properties in
a given market.
With the introduction of our new vertical search capability, we
will aggregate content from multiple web sites based on the
criteria established by the consumer and will display much more
inclusive content in response to their search. Some of this
content will be from paying customers, who will pay us for
sponsored listings, but it will be aggregated with free content
to benefit the consumer and be responsive to their needs. We
believe that this improved consumer experience, coupled with our
branding of
Move.comtm,
will drive more consumers to our sites and make our properties
more attractive for all advertisers attempting to reach new
movers. We will continue to offer a variety of services to our
customers including classified advertising, display advertising,
directory listings, web site services and software.
Classified Advertising. We offer a number of
classified advertising opportunities throughout our network of
web sites, primarily in the form of property listing
enhancements on our web sites. A major service offering for real
estate agents and brokers is the enhancement of property
listings. As the official web site of the NAR, we present basic
MLS property listings on the
REALTOR.com®
web site at no charge to NAR members. For a fee, we offer our
professional customers the ability to enhance their listings by
adding their own personal promotion in the forms of custom copy,
photographs, text effects, links to their home page and more.
Our listing enhancement product represented approximately 22%,
19% and 18% of our total revenue for fiscal years 2005, 2004 and
2003, respectively. We plan to offer enhanced listings to
homebuilder and rental customers in the second quarter of 2006.
As a separate listing enhancement product to the
REALTOR.com®
suite of services, Homestore offers two virtual tour solutions.
Hometour360®
allows customers to create, host and distribute media rich
virtual tours powered by industry leading image technologies
IPIX and iseemedia. The
PicturePath®
Link solution allows other virtual tour products, purchased by
our customers, to be distributed to
REALTOR.com®
in their full featured format. Our primary service for rental,
corporate housing and senior housing property owners and
managers is an online brochure displayed on our
RENTNET®
web site. This online brochure product represented approximately
10%, 12% and 14% of our total revenue for fiscal years 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively. We also offer a similar service to
our homebuilder customers for display on our
HomeBuilder.com®
web site. Our online brochures include property photos, floor
plan images, virtual tours, unit descriptions, community
descriptions, interactive mapping, driving directions and links
to property owners or managers web sites. A variety
of enhancements are also available to assist in increasing the
visibility of specific properties to our online audience. With
the introduction of our new vertical search capability on
Move.comtm,
we expect to provide some services on a cost per
click basis, but will still receive a majority of our
revenue from subscription based products.
Display Advertising. A variety of online
display advertising in the form of banners, vertical
skyscraper ads, and other Internet Advertising
Bureau, the IAB, standard ad sizes can be purchased for
placement throughout the Homestore network of web sites by
companies or individuals wishing to reach the largest and most
targeted real estate-oriented audience. While companies
currently make up the majority of our display advertising
customers, we also offer a number of unique display advertising
opportunities to individual real estate professionals to brand
themselves online to consumers in their local market.
Advertisers can also purchase custom advertising units on our
web sites, including text-based links and rich media products.
We offer advertisers branding and lead generation opportunities
on both fixed and variable bases, with most of our advertising
relationships tied to audience size.
We offer the following display advertising products:
(i) Featured
Homestm
allows our
REALTOR®
customers to more prominently display their property listings
with priority on the
REALTOR.com®
web site during geographically targeted property searches by
consumers; (ii) Featured
Agenttm
allows agents to promote
8
themselves and their services on
REALTOR.com®
to a geographically targeted real estate audience;
(iii) Featured
Companytm
allows brokers to promote themselves and their services to a
geographically targeted real estate audience on
REALTOR.com®;
(iv) Featured
Buildertm
allows builders to promote themselves and their services to a
geographically targeted real estate audience on
HomeBuilder.com®;
(v) Sponsorships allow advertisers to maximize their
exposure on our web sites by featuring fixed buttons
or other prominent placements on certain pages on our web sites,
presenting users with the opportunity to click-through directly
to the advertisers site and may also include other
advertising components such as content or online advertisements;
and (vi) Featured Community allows agents to promote
themselves and their community on
REALTOR.com®
to a geographically targeted real estate audience.
Directory Listings. Advertisers can purchase
placement in our online directories. Our network of web sites
includes directories of
REALTORS®,
homebuilders, lenders, and self-service storage facilities. We
believe our directory services offer advertisers the opportunity
to reach qualified consumers based upon the targeted audience
that visits our web sites and are a cost-effective way for
professionals to generate leads from online consumers.
Web sites. Our web site service is comprised
of templated and custom web sites for individuals as well as
companies. We build web sites based either on an á la carte
features and functionality basis or bundled with pre-selected
features based on industry segments, including web sites
designed specifically for
REALTORS®,
brokers, builders and manufactured housing retailers. For
customers seeking web sites with specialized features and
expanded functionality, we design and build customized web
sites. In addition to the design and
set-up of
the web sites, we also offer hosting and maintenance services.
One
Placetm
is a suite of services, including a web site, that integrates
with an interactive voice response system that is linked to a
pager network. One
Placetm
enables
REALTORS®
to be paged when a potential home buyer or home seller submits
an inquiry about a specific property listing. Additionally, if a
prospective buyer contacts the
REALTOR®
after viewing a for sale sign, the interactive voice
response system will provide the consumer with details about the
property and then page the
REALTOR®
with a notification of the callers telephone number and
the property listing for which the consumer has inquired.
Software. Our Top
Producer®
product, which provides software solutions and related services
to real estate professionals, is the leading client management
and marketing software specific to real estate agents. Top
Producer®s
line of desktop and web-based applications features client
management, appointment and task scheduling, Internet lead
distribution and follow-up, prospecting automation, comparative
market analysis, customer presentations and mobile data
synchronization for Palm devices and notebook computers.
Products are co-branded for some of the countrys largest
franchise brands, such as Keller Williams, RE/MAX,
Century 21, Coldwell Banker, ERA, and GMAC. Our Top
Producer®
business has also developed proprietary applications to enhance
the productivity and profitability of real estate professionals.
We are continually attempting to add functionality and features
to our applications, including integration with our leading
consumer web sites. We believe that our ability to assist real
estate professionals in managing relationships with their
customers enables us to better distinguish the value of our
media properties.
The Top
Producer®
software was sold exclusively as a desktop application until the
fourth quarter of 2002. Our historical Top
Producer®
desktop products reached an installed customer base of more than
100,000 agents. Top
Producer®
is now offered as an online application that is purchased
through a monthly or annual subscription. We currently have over
60,000 subscribers to this service.
Move-Related
Services Segment
Direct Mail. Welcome
Wagon®
offers local and national merchants the opportunity to reach
movers through targeted direct mail services. Welcome
Wagon®s
New Mover Program integrates local merchant advertiser
information into a welcome gift delivered through the mail to
new homeowners shortly after their move. The welcome gift
contains a customized neighborhood address book with exclusive
merchant advertiser listings as well as coupons and special
offers from local advertisers. Additionally, local advertisers
receive the names and contact information of the new homeowners
in their selected area that have received the welcome gift. This
allows local merchants the opportunity to continue to build
their relationship with these new homeowners through their own
direct marketing initiatives. The Welcome
Wagon®
gift book represented approximately 12%, 14% and 15% of our
total revenue for fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. Additionally, Welcome
Wagon®
offers local
9
merchants solo marketing opportunities through its Pinpoint Mail
product, which is sold on a per mailing basis. Launched in the
fourth quarter of 2004, Welcome
Wagon®s
Early
Advantagetm
product is a shared direct mail product for advertisers to reach
new movers at their existing addresses prior to their actual
move.
Retail Advertising. Because our web sites
attract a significant number of consumers that are contemplating
a real estate transaction or a move, we believe that we provide
businesses such as mortgage companies, home improvement
retailers and moving service providers with an efficient way to
find and communicate with their potential customers.
Homestore Plans and Publications. Homestore
Plans and Publications offers both consumers and building
professionals the ability to browse, select, modify and purchase
new home designs and project plans from one of the largest
selections of home plans and project plans available. Homestore
Plans and Publications has business relationships with many
designers that provide us the right to sell the designers
home plans directly to consumers and building professionals.
These plans are sold through magazines that are distributed at
leading retailers and newsstands nationwide and through our web
site, Homeplans.com. The Internet has become an increasingly
important channel of distribution for the sale of home plans,
and our Homeplans web site is one of the most heavily trafficked
web sites in the home plans category, distributing its home plan
content through approximately 400 affiliate partner sites.
Competition
We face competition in each segment of our business.
Real
Estate Services Segment
We compete with a variety of online companies and web sites
providing real estate content that sell classified advertising
opportunities to real estate professionals and sell display
advertising opportunities to other advertisers, including real
estate professionals, seeking to reach consumers interested in
products and services related to the home and real estate. We
also compete with web sites that attract consumers by offering
rebates for home purchases or rental leases, and then charge the
real estate professional who performed the transaction a
referral fee for the introduction. However, these sites
generally have a limited amount of real estate content and an
even more limited directory of qualified
REALTORS®.
Other online competitive models include pure lead generation
models and paid search models.
Our primary competitors for online real estate advertising
dollars include Lending Tree (a division of InterActiveCorp),
HouseValues.com, AgentConnect.com (a division of Next Phase
Media, Inc.), and HomeGain.com, Inc. In addition,
RENTNET®
faces competition from ApartmentGuide.com, Rent.com, ForRent.com
and Apartments.com, and our
HomeBuilder.com®
web site competes directly with NewHomeGuide.com and
NewHomeSource.com. Our
Homestore.com®
web site also faces competition from general interest consumer
web sites that offer home, moving and finance content, including
ServiceMagic, Inc. (a division of InterActiveCorp) and Gigamoves
(a newly formed division of eBay).
Newspapers and home/apartment guide publications are the two
primary offline competitors of our media offerings. We compete
with newspapers and home/apartment guide publications for the
advertising dollars spent by real estate professionals to
advertise their offerings. Although more than 77% of all home
buyers use the Internet to search for homes (according to the
NAR), real estate professionals currently spend only a small
percentage of their marketing budget to display their listings
on the Internet. In addition, newspapers and the publishers of
home/apartments guides, including Classified Ventures, Inc.,
PRIMEDIA Inc., and Network Communications Inc., have extended
their media offerings to include an Internet presence. We must
continue to work to shift more real estate advertising dollars
online if we are to successfully compete with newspapers and
real estate guides.
Our Top
Producer®
business faces competition from Fidelity National Information
Solutions, Inc. which offers competing solutions to real estate
professionals. Top
Producer®
also competes with horizontal Customer Relationship Management
offerings such as: Microsoft Corporations Outlook
solution, Best Software, Inc.s ACT! solution, and
FrontRange Solution, Inc.s GoldMine product. Some
providers of real estate web site solutions, such as A
La Mode, Inc., are also offering contact management
features which compete with products from Top
Producer®.
Certain Internet media companies such as HomeGain.com, Inc. and
HouseValues, Inc. are providing
10
drip marketing solutions that incorporate aspects of lead
management, which, over time, could pose a competitive threat to
Top
Producer®.
Move-Related
Services Segment
Our Welcome
Wagon®
business competes with numerous direct marketing companies that
offer advertising solutions to local and national merchants.
Competitors include Imagitas, Inc., ADVO, Inc., Valpak Direct
Marketing Systems, Inc., Pennysaver and MoneyMailer, LLC. These
competitors, like Welcome
Wagon®,
target homeowners at various stages of the home ownership life
cycle with advertising from third parties.
Our Homestore Plans and Publications business faces direct
competition from several large publishing companies that print
multiple publications, including home plan publications. Our
major competitors include Hanley-Wood, LLC and The Garlinghouse
Company. We also face competition from many smaller companies
offering home plans for sale over the Internet, such as
dreamhomesource.com and coolhouseplans.com.
Infrastructure
and Technology
We seek to maintain and enhance our market position with
consumers and real estate professionals by building proprietary
systems and consumer features into our web sites, such as search
engines for real estate listings and the technologies used to
aggregate real estate content. We regard many elements of our
web sites and underlying technologies as proprietary, and we
attempt to protect these elements and underlying technologies by
relying on trademark, service mark, patent, copyright and trade
secret laws, restrictions on disclosure and other methods. See
Intellectual Property.
Our web sites are designed to provide fast, secure and reliable
high-quality access to our services, while minimizing the
capital investment needed for our computer systems. We have
made, and expect to continue to make, technological improvements
designed to reduce costs and increase the attractiveness to the
consumer and the efficiency of our systems. We expect that
enhancements to our family of web sites, and to our products and
services, will come from internally and externally developed
technologies.
Our systems supporting our web sites must accommodate a high
volume of user traffic, store a large number of listings and
related data, process a significant number of user searches and
deliver frequently updated information. Any significant
increases in utilization of these services could strain the
capacity of our computers, causing slower response times or
outages. We host our
Homestore.com®,
REALTOR.com®,
HomeBuilder.com®,
RENTNET®,
SeniorHousingNettm.com
and custom broker web pages and the on-line subscription product
for Top
Producer®
in Thousand Oaks, California. Because substantially all of our
computer and communications hardware for each of our web sites
is located at this location, our systems are vulnerable to fire,
floods, telecommunications failures, break-ins, earthquakes and
other force majeure events. Our operations are dependent on our
ability to protect our systems from such occurrences. We are in
the process of relocating all of our data systems operations to
a new data center in Phoenix, Arizona and expect to complete the
move by the end of 2006. See Risk
Factors Internet Industry Risks for a
more complete description of the risks related to our computer
infrastructure and technology.
Intellectual
Property
We regard substantial elements of our web sites and underlying
technology as proprietary. We attempt to protect our
intellectual property by relying on a combination of trademark,
service mark, patent, copyright and trade secret laws,
restrictions on disclosure and other methods.
Despite our precautions, our intellectual property is subject to
a number of risks that may materially adversely affect our
business, including but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain
and use our proprietary information without authorization or to
develop similar technology independently;
|
|
|
|
NAR could lose the use of the trademark
REALTOR®
or we could lose the use of such trademark or the
REALTOR.com®
domain name, or be unable to protect the other trademarks or web
site addresses that are
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
important to our business, and therefore we would need to devote
substantial resources toward developing an independent brand
identity;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we could be subject to litigation with respect to our
intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
|
we may be required to license additional technology and
information from others, which could require substantial
expenditures by us; and
|
|
|
|
legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability and
scope of protection of proprietary rights in Internet-related
businesses are uncertain and continue to evolve, and we can give
no assurance regarding our ability to protect our intellectual
property and other proprietary rights.
|
See Risk Factors Risks
Related to Our Business for a more complete description of
the risks related to our intellectual property.
Seasonality
Our Welcome
Wagon®
business in our Move-Related Services segment is affected by
seasonality. Our revenue in this segment is significantly
impacted by the number of household moves in the United States
each year. Due to weather and school calendars, a
disproportionate percentage of moves take place in the second
and third calendar quarters than in the first and fourth
quarters. As a result, we distribute a larger number of our
Welcome
Wagon®
services in the second and third quarters each year. None of our
other businesses are exposed to this degree of seasonality
primarily due to the fact that much of our business in the Real
Estate Services segment is derived from annual subscription
contracts.
Employees
As of December 31, 2005, we had approximately
1,620 full-time equivalent employees. We consider our
relations with our employees to be good. We have never had a
work stoppage, and no employee is represented by collective
bargaining agreements. We believe that our future success will
depend in part on our ability to attract, integrate, retain and
motivate highly qualified personnel and upon the continued
service of our senior management and key technical personnel.
See Risk Factors Risks Related to Our
Business.
Available
Information
We file annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports, as well as our proxy statements
and other information, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). In most cases, those documents are
available, without charge, on our web site at
http://ir.homestore.com as soon as reasonably practicable
after they are filed electronically with the SEC. Copies are
also available, without charge, from Homestore, Inc., Investor
Relations, 30700 Russell Ranch Road, Westlake Village, CA 91362.
You may also read and copy these documents at the SECs
public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549 under our SEC file number
(000-26659),
and you may obtain information on the operation of the public
reference room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
In most cases, these documents are available over the Internet
from the SECs web site at http://www.sec.gov.
12
You should consider carefully the following risk factors and
other information included or incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-K.
The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only
ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently
known to us or that we deem to be currently immaterial also may
impair our business operations. If any of the following risks
actually occur, our business, financial condition and operating
results could be materially adversely affected.
Risks
Related to our Business
Changes
to our product offerings on our new home and apartment web sites
may not be accepted by our customers.
Currently, we display virtually all MLS data for listings of
existing homes without charge on
REALTOR.com®,
but only provide listings on our new home and apartment web
sites when the homebuilders or rental owners pay us on an annual
subscription basis. When we launch
Move.comtm,
which is expected to be in the second quarter of 2006, we will
replace our existing new home site,
HomeBuilder.com®,
and our existing apartment rental site,
RENTNET®,
with
Move.comtm.
In conjunction with this, we will begin to display any new home
and apartment listings for no charge. We will seek revenue from
enhanced listings, including our Showcase Listing and Featured
Listing products, as well as other forms of advertising on the
sites. We intend to price subscriptions to Showcase Listings
based on regional rate cards. Featured Listings, which will
appear above the algorithmically-generated search results, will
be priced on a fixed
cost-per-click
basis. We anticipate transitioning in the future to a real-time,
auction based
cost-per-click
pricing for Featured Listings.
When we launch
Move.comtm,
existing listing subscription customers will be transitioned
into our new products having comparable value for the duration
of their existing subscription. Although the limited number of
customers to whom we have previewed this new arrangement have
reacted favorably, there can be no assurance that our current
new home and apartment customers will purchase these new
offerings in amounts sufficient to both replace the listing
subscription revenue we will be losing and provide a return on
our costs and investments associated with our new brand and
these new products.
We
have a history of net losses and could incur net losses in the
future.
We have incurred net losses every year since 1993, except for
modest net income in 2005, including net losses of
$7.9 million and $47.1 million, for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. As of
December 31, 2005, we have an accumulated deficit of
approximately $2.0 billion. Although our annual net losses
have been decreasing and we anticipate becoming profitable in
the future, we recently announced our new brand Move and certain
business model changes that will require considerable investment
with no assurances that our future financial performance will be
enhanced by these new initiatives. Specifically, in February
2006, we announced plans to change our corporate name to Move,
Inc. and introduced our new MOVE brand, under which we will
promote three consumer offerings:
REALTOR.com®,
Welcome
Wagon®,
and a new web site,
Move.comtm.
We will incur considerable costs in introducing and maintaining
our new brand and there can be no assurances that these costs
will produce the same or greater revenue than we have
experienced in the past.
Move.comtm,
which we plan to launch in the second quarter of 2006, will
replace our
Homestore.com®,
HomeBuilder.com®
and
RENTNET®
web sites. In the past, we have charged homebuilders and rental
owners to list their properties on our
HomeBuilder.com®
and
RENTNET®
web sites. With the launch of
Move.comtm
we will provide the listings for no charge and offer enhanced
listing products and traditional text advertisements. Pricing
structures will include monthly fixed fee,
cost-per-click
and auction based pricing. Due to the potential loss of revenue
from paid listings that could result from our new pricing
structures, our results of operations could be adversely
affected, particularly in the second and third quarters of 2006,
as we seek to transition our customers to the new pricing model.
In addition, over the longer term there can be no assurance that
this new business model will produce sufficient revenue to cover
the considerable investment we intend to make in these new
initiatives or to replace the listings revenue.
13
The
emergence of competitors for our services may adversely impact
our business.
Our existing and potential competitors include web sites
offering real estate related content and services as well as
general purpose online services, and traditional media such as
newspapers, magazines and television that may compete for
advertising dollars. The real estate search services market in
which our Real Estate Services segment operates is becoming
increasingly competitive. A number of competitors have emerged,
including Lending Tree (a division of InterActive Corp),
HouseValues.com, AgentConnect.com (a division of Next Phase
Media, Inc.), HomeGain.com, Inc., ApartmentGuide.com, Rent.com,
ForRent.com, Apartments.com, NewHomeGuide.com and
NewHomeSource.com, as well as general interest consumer web
sites that offer home, moving and finance content, including
ServiceMagic, Inc. (a division of InterActiveCorp) and Gigamoves
(a newly formed division of eBay).
The barriers to entry for web-based services and businesses are
low. In addition, parties with whom we have listing and
marketing agreements could choose to develop their own Internet
strategies or competing real estate sites. Many of our existing
and potential competitors have longer operating histories in the
Internet market, greater name recognition, larger consumer bases
and significantly greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. The rapid pace of technological change
constantly creates new opportunities for existing and new
competitors and it can quickly render our existing technologies
less valuable. Developments in the real estate search services
market may also encourage additional competitors to enter that
market. See We may not be able to continue to obtain
more listings from Multiple Listing Services and real estate
brokers than other web site operators below.
We cannot predict how, if at all, our competitors may respond to
our newly announced initiatives, such as the mapping solution
that our new
Move.comtm
website will offer that will show users the exact location of
their search results on a map. We also cannot provide assurance
that our new offerings will be able to compete successfully
against these competitors or new competitors that enter our
markets.
We may
not be able to continue to obtain more listings from Multiple
Listing Services and real estate brokers than other web site
operators.
We believe that the success of
REALTOR.com®
depends in large part on displaying a larger quantity and more
current listings of existing homes for sale than other web
sites. We obtain these listings through agreements with
MLSs that have fixed terms, typically 12 to
36 months. At the end of the term of each agreement, the
MLS could choose not to renew their agreement with us. There are
no assurances the MLSs will continue to renew their
agreements to provide listing data to us. If they choose not to
renew their relationship with us, then
REALTOR.com®
could become less attractive to consumers and thus, less
attractive to our advertising customers.
In addition, NAR has adopted a policy that allows a broker to
prevent MLSs from providing such brokers listing
data to other brokers web sites. This policy does not
apply to
REALTOR.com®.
In a civil antitrust lawsuit brought against NAR in 2005, the
United States Department of Justice (the DOJ)
challenged this policy by alleging that it is in violation of
federal antitrust laws. It is possible that the ultimate
resolution of this antitrust case could make it easier for other
web sites to aggregate MLS listing data for display over the
Internet in a manner comparable to
REALTOR.com®.
This could impact how consumers and customers value our content
and product offerings on the
REALTOR.com®
web site.
Our
quarterly financial results are subject to significant
fluctuations.
Our quarterly results of operations have varied in the past and
may vary significantly in the future. We have made significant
investments in our businesses and incurred significant sales and
marketing expenses and plan to continue this as we develop our
new brand, MOVE, and related new business initiatives. As we
discontinue our paid inclusion model for new home and apartment
listings and seek to replace that revenue with enhanced listing
products and advertising offered under fixed fee,
cost-per-click
and auction pricing models, we could experience a decline in
quarterly revenue, especially in the second and third quarters
of 2006. If revenue from these initiatives falls below our
expectations, we will not be able to reduce our spending or
change our pricing models rapidly in response to the shortfall.
Fluctuations in our quarterly results could also adversely
affect the price of our common stock.
14
Other factors that could affect our quarterly operating results
include those described elsewhere in this
Form 10-K,
and include:
|
|
|
|
|
the level at which real estate agents, brokers, homebuilders and
rental owners renew the arrangements through which they obtain
our services;
|
|
|
|
the amount of advertising sold on our web sites and the timing
of payments for this advertising; and
|
|
|
|
the costs from pending litigation, including the cost of
settlements.
|
The
ongoing investigations by the SEC and the DOJ could require us
to continue to incur costs and could divert management attention
from our business operations.
In December 2001, we announced that the Audit Committee of our
Board of Directors was conducting an inquiry into certain of our
accounting practices and that the results of the inquiry to date
indicated that our unaudited interim financial statements for
2001 would require restatement. In March 2002, we filed an
amended
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000 and amended
Form 10-Qs
for the first three quarters of 2001. In January 2002, we were
notified that the SEC had issued a formal order of private
investigation in connection with the accounting matters that
resulted in the restatement of our financial statements. The SEC
requested that we provide them with certain documents concerning
the restatement and requested access to certain of our current
and former employees for interviews. We have cooperated and
continue to cooperate fully with the SECs investigation as
well as a parallel investigation by the DOJ.
Since September 2002, certain of our former employees have
entered into plea agreements with the United States
Attorneys Office and the SEC in connection with the
SECs investigation. Also in September 2002, the SEC and
the DOJ informed us that, in light of the actions taken by our
Board of Directors and our Audit Committee and our cooperation
in the SECs investigation, those agencies would not bring
any enforcement action against us. In April 2005, a grand jury
in Los Angeles indicted two of our former officers, Stuart Wolff
and Peter Tafeen, in connection with the accounting
irregularities described above and on March 2, 2006, Peter
Tafeen pled guilty to one count of securities fraud. The trial
for Wolff is scheduled to begin in March 2006. Because the SEC
and DOJ investigations are ongoing and we are committed to
continuing to cooperate with those investigations, we will
likely continue to incur additional costs related to the
investigation, including the costs of making documents available
to these agencies. In addition, the effort and attention
required to respond to the investigations could divert
managements attention from our business operations.
Continued
obligations to Cendant Corporation related our settlement of our
securities class action lawsuit could have an adverse effect on
our financial condition.
We could be subject to potential claims by Cendant Corporation
(Cendant) for contribution or indemnity in
connection with the securities class action lawsuit commenced
against us following the December 2001 announcement of the
discovery of accounting irregularities and the subsequent
restatement of our 2000 and interim 2001 financial statements
(the Securities Class Action Lawsuit). Although
Cendant was dismissed with prejudice as a defendant in the
Securities Class Action Lawsuit, that dismissal has been
appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit. In October 2004, the SEC filed an amicus brief in
support of the appeal. If Cendants dismissal as a
defendant in the Securities Class Action Lawsuit is
reversed on appeal and Cendant is subsequently found liable or
settles the claims against it in the Securities
Class Action Lawsuit, Cendant will likely seek
indemnification, contribution or similar relief from us.
Although the settlement of the Securities Class Action
Lawsuit, which became final on March 4, 2005, includes a
bar order that may preclude Cendant from seeking
indemnification, contribution or similar relief from us in the
event Cendant is found liable or settles claims against it in
the Securities Class Action Lawsuit, we have been advised
by counsel that the law is unclear on whether Cendant would be
so precluded. Therefore, we would likely incur significant
expenses in defending such an action by Cendant and could
ultimately be found liable to Cendant or settle with Cendant,
notwithstanding the bar order. Such expenses, liability or
settlement could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations and our financial position.
15
In addition, if Cendant is not permitted to share in the
settlement of the Securities Class Action Lawsuit (which
would be the case if its dismissal as a defendant is reversed on
appeal), we have agreed to pay or otherwise provide to Cendant
the amount of money
and/or other
consideration that Cendant would have been otherwise entitled to
receive from that portion of the class action settlement fund
provided by us had Cendant been a class member and
Cendants proof of claim in respect of its shares had been
accepted in full. At this time, Cendant is still a member of the
class and has not been excluded, but is one of the members of
the class whose dismissal as a defendant is pending appeal. As
such, Cendant has not yet received any of the $13.0 million
cash or 20.0 million shares of stock we paid in the
settlement. We estimate that Cendant could be entitled to
receive approximately $2.3 million in cash and
approximately 3.79 million shares from us should Cendant be
prevented from participating in the settlement.
We
could be required to expend substantial amounts in connection
with continuing indemnification obligations to a purchaser of
one of our businesses.
As part of the sale in 2002 of our ConsumerInfo division to
Experian Holdings, Inc. (Experian),
$10.0 million of the purchase price was put in escrow to
secure our indemnification obligations (the Indemnity
Escrow). The Indemnity Escrow was scheduled to terminate
in the third quarter of 2003, but prior to the scheduled
termination, Experian demanded indemnification from us for
claims made against Experian or its subsidiaries by several
parties and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC),
including allegations of unfair and deceptive advertising in
connection with ConsumerInfos furnishing of credit reports
and providing Advice for Improving Credit that
appeared on its web site both before, during and after our
ownership of ConsumerInfo. Under the stock purchase agreement
pursuant to which we sold ConsumerInfo to Experian, we could
have elected to defend against the claims, but because the
alleged conduct occurred both before and after our sale to
Experian, we elected to rely on Experian to defend them.
Accordingly, we have not made a complete evaluation of the
underlying claims, but rather receive periodic updates from
Experian and its counsel concerning their defense of the claims.
The FTC action against Experian has now been resolved by
stipulated judgment that requires, among other things, that
refunds be made available to certain customers who purchased
ConsumerInfo products during the period November 2000 through
September 2003. Experian is in the process of administering the
settlement and we are unable to estimate the amounts for which
Experian will seek indemnity from us at this time.
Other civil actions for which Experian demanded indemnification
from us continue. Because those cases are continuing, the
amounts to be paid by Experian arising from these actions for
which Experian will seek indemnity from us cannot be estimated.
There is no assurance that Experian will not seek to recover
from us an amount in excess of the Indemnity Escrow. Under the
terms of the stock purchase agreement, our maximum potential
liability for the claims by Experian is capped at
$29.3 million less the balance in the Indemnity Escrow,
which was $7.5 million at December 31, 2005.
We are
and may continue to be involved in litigation and other
disputes.
Our business and operations may subject us to claims, litigation
and other proceedings brought by private parties and
governmental authorities. We are currently involved in several
matters, which are described in Note 22, Commitments
and Contingencies Legal Proceedings, to
our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 in this
Form 10-K.
Litigation may also result from other companies owning or
obtaining patents or other intellectual property rights that
could prevent, limit or interfere with our ability to provide
our products and services. In recent years, there has been
significant litigation in the United States involving patents
and other intellectual property rights, including in the
Internet industry, and companies in the Internet market are
increasingly making claims alleging infringement of their
intellectual property rights. We have in the past and are
currently involved in intellectual property-related disputes,
and we may be involved in such disputes in the future, to
protect our intellectual property or as a result of an alleged
infringement of the intellectual property of others. Any such
lawsuits, even if ultimately resolved in our favor, would likely
be time-consuming and expensive to resolve and would divert
managements time and attention. In addition to bringing
litigation against us, parties that allege infringement of their
intellectual property have in the past requested and may in the
future request us to obtain a license from them to use that
16
intellectual property. Any potential intellectual property
dispute also could force us to do one or more of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
stop selling, incorporating or using services that use the
challenged intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
obtain from the owner of the infringed intellectual property a
license to the relevant intellectual property, which may require
us to license our intellectual property to such owner, or may
not be available on reasonable terms or at all; and
|
|
|
|
redesign those services that use technology that is the subject
of an infringement claim.
|
If we are forced to take any of the foregoing actions, such
actions could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and our financial position. Pursuant to our operating
agreement with NAR, we may also be required to indemnify NAR for
liabilities arising from the infringement or alleged
infringement of third parties intellectual property
rights, and these indemnification obligations could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and our
financial position.
We
rely on intellectual property and proprietary
rights.
We regard substantial elements of our web sites and underlying
technology as proprietary. Despite our precautionary measures,
third parties may copy or otherwise obtain and use our
proprietary information without authorization or develop similar
technology independently. Any legal action that we may bring to
protect our proprietary information could be unsuccessful,
expensive and distract management from
day-to-day
operations.
Other companies may own, obtain or claim trademarks that could
prevent or limit or interfere with use of the trademarks we use.
The
REALTOR.com®
web site address and trademark and the
REALTOR®
trademark are important to our business and are licensed to us
by NAR. If we were to lose the
REALTOR.com®
domain name or the use of these trademarks, our business would
be harmed and we would need to devote substantial resources
toward developing an independent brand identity.
Legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability and
scope of protection of proprietary rights in Internet-related
businesses are uncertain and evolving, and we can give no
assurance regarding the future viability or value of any of our
proprietary rights.
Our
recently issued Series B Preferred Stock could make it more
difficult for us to raise additional capital.
In November 2005, we sold to Elevation Partners, L.P. and
Elevation Employee Side Fund, LLC (together,
Elevation) an aggregate of 100,000 shares of
our Series B Convertible Participating Preferred Stock (the
Series B Preferred Stock) for an aggregate
purchase price of $100 million. For so long as the holders
of Series B Preferred Stock hold at least one-sixth of
these 100,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, we
are generally not permitted, without obtaining the consent of
holders representing at least a majority of the then outstanding
shares of Series B Preferred Stock, to create or issue any
equity securities that rank senior or on a parity with the
Series B Preferred Stock with respect to dividend rights or
rights upon our liquidation. In addition, our stockholders
agreement with Elevation limits the amount of debt we can incur.
If we need to raise additional capital through public or private
financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements to
execute our business plan, we would be restricted in the type of
equity securities that we could offer and the amount of debt we
can incur without the consent of Elevation. We can not offer any
assurances that we would be able to obtain that consent. If we
were unable to obtain Elevations consent, we may not be
able to raise additional capital in the amounts needed to fund
our business or for terms that are desirable.
Our
relationship with the National Association of
REALTORS®
is an important part of our business plan and our business could
be harmed if we were to lose the benefits of this
agreement.
The
REALTOR.com®
trademark and web site address and the
REALTOR®
trademark are owned by NAR. NAR licenses these trademarks to our
subsidiary RealSelect under a license agreement, and RealSelect
operates the
REALTOR.com®
web site under an operating agreement with NAR. Our operating
agreement with NAR contains
17
restrictions on how we can operate the
REALTOR.com®
web site. For example, we can only enter into agreements with
entities that provide us with real estate listings, such as
MLSs, on terms approved by NAR. In addition, NAR can
require us to include on
REALTOR.com®
real estate related content that it has developed.
Our operating agreement with NAR, as amended, also contains a
number of provisions that restrict how we operate our business.
For example:
|
|
|
|
|
we would need to obtain the consent of NAR if we want to acquire
or develop another service that provides real estate listings on
an Internet site or through other electronic means; any consent
from NAR, if obtained, could be conditioned on our agreeing to
conditions such as paying fees to NAR or limiting the types of
content or listings on the web sites or service or other terms
and conditions;
|
|
|
|
we are restricted in the type and subject matter of, and the
manner in which we display, advertisements on the
REALTOR.com®
web site;
|
|
|
|
NAR has the right to approve how we use its trademarks, and we
must comply with its quality standards for the use of these
marks; and
|
|
|
|
we must meet performance standards relating to the availability
time of the
REALTOR.com®
web site.
|
NAR also has significant influence over our RealSelect
subsidiarys corporate governance, including the right to
have one representative as a member of our Board of Directors
(out of a current total of 10) and two representatives as
members of RealSelects Board of Directors (out of a
current total of 8). RealSelect also cannot take certain
actions, including amending its certificate of incorporation or
bylaws, pledging its assets and making changes in its executive
officers or Board of Directors, without the consent of at least
one of NARs representatives on its Board of Directors.
Although the
REALTOR.com®
operating agreement is a perpetual agreement and it does not
contain provisions that allow us to terminate, NAR may terminate
it for a variety of reasons. These include:
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of us or RealSelect by another party;
|
|
|
|
if traffic on the
REALTOR.com®
site falls below 500,000 unique users per month;
|
|
|
|
a substantial decrease in the number of property listings on our
REALTOR.com®
site; and
|
|
|
|
a breach of any of our other obligations under the agreement
that we do not cure within 30 days of being notified by NAR
of the breach.
|
If our operating agreement with NAR were terminated, we would be
required to transfer a copy of the software that operates the
REALTOR.com®
web site and assign our agreements with data content providers,
such as real estate brokers or MLSs, to NAR. NAR would
then be able to operate the
REALTOR.com®
web site itself or with another third party.
It is
important to our success that we support our real estate
professional customers.
Since many real estate professionals are not sophisticated
technology users and often spend limited amounts of time in
their offices, it is important that these customers find that
our software and web site products significantly enhance their
productivity and are easy to use. To meet these needs, we
provide customer training and have developed a customer support
organization that seeks to respond to customer inquiries as
quickly as possible. If we do not maintain adequate support
levels, our customers may choose not to renew their
subscriptions for our software and web site products.
We
must dedicate significant resources to market our subscription
products and services to real estate
professionals.
Real estate agents are generally independent contractors rather
than employees of brokers and typically spend a majority of
their time outside the office. As a result, it is often
necessary for us to communicate with them on an individual
basis. This results in relatively high fixed costs associated
with our inside and field-based sales activities.
18
In addition, since we offer services to both real estate brokers
and agents, we are often required to contact them separately
when marketing our products and services.
A
failure to establish and maintain strategic online relationships
that generate a significant amount of traffic could limit the
growth of our business.
We have established strategic relationships with online
companies that generate a significant amount of online traffic
for our web sites. Failure to maintain these relationships and
create new ones could limit the growth of our business. Although
we expect that a significant portion of our online customers
will continue to come to our web sites directly, we also
continue to rely on third-party web sites with which we have
relationships, including web sites operated by AOL, Yahoo!, MSN,
Excite, iWon.com, Internet Broadcast Systems, United Online
through its Juno and NetZero brands, Overture and Google for
online traffic. We may also be required to pay significant fees
to establish, maintain and expand our existing online
relationships. As a result, our revenue may suffer if we fail to
enter into new relationships or maintain existing relationships
or if these relationships do not result in online traffic
sufficient to justify their costs.
Our
future success depends largely on our ability to attract, retain
and motivate personnel.
Our future success depends on our ability to attract, retain and
motivate highly skilled technical, managerial and sales
personnel, our senior management and other key personnel. The
loss of the services of key employees would likely have a
significantly detrimental effect on our business. Several of our
key senior management have employment agreements that we believe
will assist in our ability to retain them. However, many other
key employees do not have employment agreements. Competition for
qualified personnel in our industry and geographical locations
is intense. Attracting and retaining qualified personnel with
experience in the real estate industry, a complex industry that
requires a unique knowledge base, is an additional challenge for
us. We can give no assurance that we will be successful in
attracting, integrating, retaining and motivating a sufficient
number of qualified employees to conduct our business in the
future. The loss of services of any of our key personnel,
excessive turnover of our work force, the inability to retain
and attract qualified personnel in the future or delays in
hiring required personnel may have a material adverse effect on
our business, operating results or financial condition.
Delaware
law, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, and other
agreements contain provisions that could discourage a
takeover.
Delaware law, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, our
operating agreement with NAR, other agreements with business
partners and a stockholders agreement could have the effect of
delaying or preventing a third party from acquiring us, even if
a change in control would be beneficial to our stockholders. For
example, we currently have a classified Board of Directors,
although our certificate of incorporation has been amended to
provide for the annual election of all directors beginning at
our annual meeting of our shareholders in 2008. In addition, our
stockholders are unable to act by written consent or to fill any
vacancy on the Board of Directors. Our stockholders cannot call
special meetings of stockholders for any purpose, including to
remove any director or the entire Board of Directors without
cause. Certain terms of the Series B Preferred Stock could
also discourage a third party from acquiring us. Upon a change
in control, we would be required to make an offer to repurchase
all of the outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock
for total cash consideration generally equal to 101% of the
liquidation preference ($100 million plus all accrued and
unpaid dividends) plus, under certain circumstances, 101% of a
portion of the dividends which would have accrued had the
Series B Preferred Stock remained outstanding. In addition,
NAR could terminate the
REALTOR.com®
operating agreement if we are acquired and they do not consent
to the acquisition.
Confusion
among consumers about our new name and the related rebranding of
some of our web sites could adversely affect our
business.
We recently announced our intention to change our corporate name
to Move, Inc.
Move.comtm,
which we plan to launch in the second quarter of 2006, will
replace our
Homestore.com®,
HomeBuilder.com®
and
RENTNET®
web sites. Until the Move name becomes recognized in the markets
in which we compete, we could experience some confusion by
consumers and temporarily be at a competitive disadvantage.
Although we intend to devote
19
substantial resources to promoting our new name and
communicating with consumers, the transition period may take
longer than anticipated and our business may, during that
period, be adversely affected.
Real
Estate Industry Risks
Our
business is dependent on the strength of the real estate
industry, which is both cyclical and seasonal and is affected by
general economic conditions.
The real estate industry traditionally has been cyclical.
Recently, sales of real estate in the United States have been at
historically high levels. Economic swings in the real estate
industry may be caused by various factors. When interest rates
are high or general national and global economic conditions are
or are perceived to be weak, there is typically less sales
activity in real estate. A decrease in the current level of
sales of real estate and products and services related to real
estate could adversely affect demand for our products and
services. In addition, reduced traffic on our web sites could
cause our subscription and advertising revenue to decline, which
would materially and adversely affect our business.
During recessionary periods, there tends to be a corresponding
decline in demand for real estate, generally and regionally,
that could adversely affect certain segments of our business.
Such adverse effects typically are a general decline in rents
and sales prices, a decline in leasing activity, a decline in
the level of investments in, and the value of, real estate, and
an increase in defaults by tenants under their respective
leases. All of these, in turn, adversely affect revenue for fees
and brokerage commissions, which are derived from property
sales, and annual rental payments and property management fees.
Purchases of real property and related products and services are
particularly affected by negative trends in the general economy.
The success of our operations depends to a significant extent
upon a number of factors relating to discretionary consumer and
business spending, and the overall economy, as well as regional
and local economic conditions in markets where we operate,
including interest rates, taxation policies, availability of
credit, employment levels, wage and salary levels and fears of
terrorist attacks or threats of war.
We could experience seasonality in our business as we offer new
products and new pricing models. The real estate industry, in
most areas of the United States, generally experiences a
decrease in activity during the winter.
We
have risks associated with changing legislation in the real
estate industry.
Real estate is a heavily regulated industry in the U.S.,
including regulation under the Fair Housing Act, the Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act and state advertising laws. In
addition, states could enact legislation or regulatory policies
in the future, which could require us to expend significant
resources to comply. These laws and related regulations may
limit or restrict our activities. As the real estate industry
evolves in the Internet environment, legislators, regulators and
industry participants may advocate additional legislative or
regulatory initiatives. Should existing laws or regulations be
amended or new laws or regulations be adopted, we may need to
comply with additional legal requirements and incur resulting
costs, or we may be precluded from certain activities. For
instance,
RENTNET®
was required to qualify and register as a real estate
agent/broker in the State of California. To date, we have not
spent significant resources on lobbying or related government
issues. Any need to significantly increase our lobbying or
related activities could substantially increase our operating
costs.
Internet
Industry Risks
Our
internal network infrastructure could be disrupted as a result
of our move to a new data center or other
problems.
Our operations depend upon our ability to maintain and protect
our computer systems, located at our corporate headquarters in
Westlake Village, California and our technology facility in
Thousand Oaks, California. During 2005, we began the process of
upgrading a facility we have leased in Phoenix, Arizona, to
which we will relocate our Thousand Oaks data center operations.
We expect to continue to incur costs as we complete the building
process and transition these operations to the new facilities.
If we encounter delays or difficulties in the transition of
operations to the new facilities, our operations could be
disrupted and our financial condition could be adversely
affected.
20
Temporary or permanent outages of our computers or software
equipment could have an adverse effect on our business. Although
we have not experienced any material outages to date, we
currently do not have a fully redundant system for our web sites
and other services at an alternate site. Therefore, our systems
are vulnerable to damage from break-ins, unauthorized access,
vandalism, fire, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications
failures and similar events. Although we maintain insurance
against fires, earthquakes and general business interruptions,
the amount of coverage, while adequate to replace assets and
compensate for losses incurred, may not be adequate to
compensate for the disruption it causes our customers and
consumers, which could affect our future revenues and traffic.
Experienced computer programmers, or hackers, may attempt to
penetrate our network security from time to time. Although we
have not experienced any material security breaches to date, a
hacker who penetrates our network security could misappropriate
proprietary information or cause interruptions in our services.
We might be required to expend significant capital and resources
to protect against, or to alleviate, problems caused by hackers.
We also may not have a timely remedy against a hacker who is
able to penetrate our network security. In addition to
purposeful security breaches, the inadvertent transmission of
computer viruses could expose us to litigation or to a material
risk of loss.
We
depend on continued improvements to our computer network and the
infrastructure of the Internet.
Any failure of our computer systems that causes interruption or
slower response time of our web sites or services could result
in a smaller number of users of our web sites or the web sites
that we host for real estate professionals. If sustained or
repeated, these performance issues could reduce the
attractiveness of our web sites to consumers and our
subscription products and services to real estate professionals,
providers of real estate-related products and services and other
Internet advertisers. Increases in the volume of our web site
traffic could also strain the capacity of our existing computer
systems, which could lead to slower response times or system
failures. This would cause the number of real property search
inquiries, advertising impressions, other revenue producing
offerings and our informational offerings to decline, any of
which could hurt our revenue growth and our brand loyalty. We
may need to incur additional costs to upgrade our computer
systems in order to accommodate increased demand if our systems
cannot handle current or higher volumes of traffic. We may not
be able to project accurately the rate, timing or cost of any
increases in our business, or to expand and upgrade our systems
and infrastructure to accommodate any increases in a timely
manner.
Our ability to increase the speed with which we provide services
to consumers and to increase the scope of these services is
limited by and dependent upon the speed and reliability of the
Internet. Consequently, the emergence and growth of the market
for our services is dependent on the performance of and future
improvements to the Internet.
We
could face liability for information on our web sites and for
products and services sold over the Internet.
We provide third-party content on our web sites, particularly
real estate listings. We could be exposed to liability with
respect to this third-party information. Persons might assert,
among other things, that by directly or indirectly providing a
link to web sites operated by third parties, we should be liable
for copyright or trademark infringement or other wrongful
actions by the third parties operating those web sites. They
could also assert that our third-party information contains
errors or omissions, and consumers could seek damages for losses
incurred if they rely upon incorrect information.
We enter into agreements with other companies under which we
share with these other companies revenue resulting from
advertising or the purchase of services through direct links to
or from our web sites. These arrangements may expose us to
additional legal risks and uncertainties, including local,
state, federal and foreign government regulation and potential
liabilities to consumers of these services, even if we do not
provide the services ourselves. We cannot offer an assurance
that any indemnification provided to us in our agreements with
these parties, if available, will be adequate.
21
Even if these claims do not result in liability to us, we could
incur significant costs in investigating and defending against
these claims. Our general liability insurance may not cover all
potential claims to which we are exposed and may not be adequate
to indemnify us for all liability that may be imposed.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments.
|
None.
We maintain the following principal facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Feet
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Principal executive and corporate
office (C)(RS)(MRS)
|
|
Westlake Village, CA
|
|
|
137,762
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Technology
facility (C)(RS)(MRS)
|
|
Thousand Oaks, CA
|
|
|
13,717
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Technology
facility (C)(RS)(MRS)
|
|
Phoenix, AZ
|
|
|
8,114
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Operations and customer service
center (RS)(MRS)
|
|
Scottsdale, AZ
|
|
|
36,175
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Welcome
Wagon®
(MRS)
|
|
Plainview, NY
|
|
|
48,148
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Top
Producer®
(RS)
|
|
Richmond, BC
|
|
|
33,702
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Homestore Plans and Publication
(MRS)
|
|
St. Paul, MN
|
|
|
24,645
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Enterprise (RS)
|
|
Milwaukee, WI
|
|
|
13,016
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Moving.com (MRS)
|
|
Marlborough, MA
|
|
|
5,580
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
(C Corporate) (RS Real Estate
Services) (MRS Move-Related Services)
We believe that our existing facilities and office space are
adequate to meet current requirements.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
From time to time, we are party to various litigation and
administrative proceedings relating to claims arising from our
operations in the ordinary course of business. See the
disclosure regarding litigation included in Note 21,
Settlements of Disputes and Litigation, and
Note 22, Commitments and
Contingencies Legal Proceedings, to our
Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of
this
Form 10-K,
which disclosures are incorporated herein by reference. As of
the date of this
Form 10-K
and except as set forth herein, we are not a party to any other
litigation or administrative proceedings that management
believes will have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
|
We did not submit any matters to a vote of security holders
during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005.
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
Market
Information
Our common stock was traded on The NASDAQ SmallCap Market under
the symbol HOMS from November 18, 2002 until
January 2, 2004. Prior to that time, our common stock was
traded on The NASDAQ National Market. On January 2, 2004,
we resumed trading on The NASDAQ National Market. The following
table
22
shows the high and low sale prices of the common stock as
reported by The NASDAQ National Market for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
5.58
|
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
5.95
|
|
|
|
3.70
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
4.29
|
|
|
|
1.81
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
3.31
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
|
|
2.09
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
2.34
|
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
4.64
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
5.84
|
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (through
February 28, 2006)
|
|
|
6.56
|
|
|
|
5.12
|
|
On February 22, 2006, we announced our intention to change
our symbol to MOVE. This change should occur in the
second quarter of 2006.
As of February 28, 2006, there were approximately 3,316
record holders of our common stock. Because many of these shares
are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of
stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of
stockholders represented by these record holders.
Dividends
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the
foreseeable future, except for an annual dividend of $0.08 to be
paid on the one share of our Series A preferred stock held
by NAR. We are obligated to pay dividends on our Series B
Preferred Stock of 3.5% per year, paid quarterly. For the
first five years the Series B Preferred Stock is
outstanding, the dividend will be paid in-kind in
shares of Series B Preferred Stock. See Note 15,
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, to our
Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of
the
Form 10-K
for information regarding restrictions on our ability to pay
dividends.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
There were no sales of unregistered equity securities by
Homestore during 2005 that have not previously been reported in
a Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
or in a Current Report on
Form 8-K.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation
Plans
The following table provides information as of December 31,
2005 regarding compensation plans (including individual
compensation arrangements) under which our equity securities are
authorized for issuance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Remaining Available For
|
|
|
|
be Issued Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
of Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a)
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders
|
|
|
25,091
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
3,433
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
|
|
7,123
|
|
|
$
|
2.26
|
|
|
|
10,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
32,214
|
|
|
$
|
2.84
|
|
|
|
13,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
Each of the above plans provides that the number of shares with
respect to which options may be granted, and the number of
shares of common stock subject to an outstanding option, shall
be proportionately adjusted in the event of a subdivision or
consolidation of shares or the payment of a stock dividend on
common stock, and the purchase price per share of outstanding
options shall be proportionately revised.
The Homestore, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, a security-holder
approved plan, contains a provision for an automatic increase in
the number of shares available for issuance each January 1
(until January 1, 2009) by an amount equal to 4.5% of
the total number of outstanding shares as of the preceding
December 31; provided that the aggregate number of shares
that qualify as Incentive Stock Options (as defined in the plan)
must not exceed 20.0 million shares.
Non-Shareholder
Approved Plans
Options are granted from the Homestore, Inc. 2002 Stock
Incentive Plan, a plan established in January 2002 to attract
and retain qualified personnel. No more then 40% of the
available securities granted under this plan may be awarded to
our directors or executive officers. Option grants under this
plan are non-qualified stock options and generally have a
4-year
vesting schedule and a
10-year life.
Other non-shareholder approved plans include the following plans
assumed in connection with prior acquisitions: The
1997-1998
Stock Incentive Plan of Cendant Corporation, the Cendant
Corporation Move.com Group 1999 Stock Option Plan, as amended
and restated effective as of March 21, 2000, the Move.com,
Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, the HomeWrite Incorporated 2000
Equity Incentive Plan, the ConsumerInfo.com, Inc. 1999 Stock
Option Plan, the iPlace 2000 Stock Option Plan, the
eNeighborhoods, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, the Qspace, Inc.
1999 Stock Option Plan, the iPlace, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive
Plan and The Hessel Group, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan. Each of
these plans (i) was intended to attract, retain and
motivate employees, (ii) was administered by the Board of
Directors or by a committee of the Board of Directors of such
entities, and (iii) provided that options granted
thereunder would be exercisable as determined by such Board or
committee, provided that no option would be exercisable after
the expiration of 10 years after the grant date. We did not
grant options under any of these plans in 2005 and 2004, and we
do not plan to do so in the future. Options outstanding as of
December 31, 2005 pursuant to compensation plans assumed in
connection with prior acquisitions, in the aggregate, total
180,249 and the weighted average exercise price of those option
shares is $20.30.
For additional information regarding our equity compensation
plans, see Note 13, Stock Plans, to our
Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of
this
Form 10-K.
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
You should read the following selected consolidated financial
data together with the Consolidated Financial Statements and
related notes included in
Part II Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data and
Part II Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.
The consolidated statement of operations data for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and the consolidated
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 are
derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Part II Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. The
consolidated statement of operations data for the year ended
December 31, 2002 and the consolidated balance sheet data
as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 have been derived from
audited Consolidated Financial Statements not included in this
Form 10-K.
The consolidated statement of operations data for the year ended
December 31, 2001 and the
24
consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2001
have been derived from unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements not included in this
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of
Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue(2)
|
|
$
|
252,622
|
|
|
$
|
216,860
|
|
|
$
|
198,227
|
|
|
$
|
219,867
|
|
|
$
|
254,103
|
|
Related party revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,695
|
|
|
|
31,158
|
|
|
|
38,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
252,622
|
|
|
|
216,860
|
|
|
|
205,922
|
|
|
|
251,025
|
|
|
|
292,449
|
|
Cost of revenue(2)
|
|
|
56,188
|
|
|
|
50,829
|
|
|
|
56,569
|
|
|
|
73,622
|
|
|
|
110,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
196,434
|
|
|
|
166,031
|
|
|
|
149,353
|
|
|
|
177,403
|
|
|
|
182,072
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing(2)
|
|
|
91,071
|
|
|
|
88,388
|
|
|
|
101,122
|
|
|
|
161,554
|
|
|
|
239,790
|
|
Product and web site development(2)
|
|
|
22,059
|
|
|
|
15,362
|
|
|
|
17,065
|
|
|
|
25,497
|
|
|
|
32,397
|
|
General and administrative(2)
|
|
|
82,545
|
|
|
|
68,442
|
|
|
|
65,333
|
|
|
|
83,042
|
|
|
|
168,695
|
|
Amortization of goodwill and
intangible assets(3)
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
7,894
|
|
|
|
21,863
|
|
|
|
34,699
|
|
|
|
199,291
|
|
Restructuring charges(2)
|
|
|
(1,331
|
)
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
12,057
|
|
|
|
50,234
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,999
|
|
|
|
3,482
|
|
|
|
925,094
|
|
Litigation settlement
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
63,600
|
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
199,718
|
|
|
|
183,570
|
|
|
|
300,082
|
|
|
|
343,331
|
|
|
|
1,615,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(3,284
|
)
|
|
|
(17,539
|
)
|
|
|
(150,729
|
)
|
|
|
(165,928
|
)
|
|
|
(1,433,429
|
)
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
(406
|
)
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
10,490
|
|
Gain on settlement of distribution
agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
2,366
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
(5,694
|
)
|
|
|
(44,393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
(14,501
|
)
|
|
|
(46,373
|
)
|
|
|
(168,949
|
)
|
|
|
(1,467,332
|
)
|
Gain on disposition of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
7,294
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
11,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(679
|
)
|
|
|
(3,281
|
)
|
|
|
(6,266
|
)
|
|
|
1,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
(7,886
|
)
|
|
|
(47,124
|
)
|
|
|
(163,425
|
)
|
|
|
(1,465,589
|
)
|
Convertible preferred stock dividend
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
(7,886
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,124
|
)
|
|
$
|
(163,425
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,465,589
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share
applicable to common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.66
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share
applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.39
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share
applicable to common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.66
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share
applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.39
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13.64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in calculation of
income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
147,175
|
|
|
|
136,518
|
|
|
|
118,996
|
|
|
|
117,900
|
|
|
|
107,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
182,548
|
|
|
|
136,518
|
|
|
|
118,996
|
|
|
|
117,900
|
|
|
|
107,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2001
include Internet Pictures Corporation (iPIX),
Computer for Tracts (CFT), Homewrite, Inc.,
Homebid.com, Inc., and Move.com Group which includes Welcome
Wagon International, Inc., and
RENTNET®. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The following chart summarizes the stock-based charges that have
been included in the following captions for the periods
presented: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Stock-based Charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
|
$
|
1,501
|
|
|
$
|
2,456
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
|
|
63,848
|
|
|
|
71,188
|
|
Product and web site development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
6,237
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,115
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
$
|
7,249
|
|
|
$
|
66,907
|
|
|
$
|
80,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
152,322
|
|
|
$
|
59,859
|
|
|
$
|
35,517
|
|
|
$
|
80,463
|
|
|
$
|
38,272
|
|
Working capital (deficiency)
|
|
|
95,810
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
(70,729
|
)
|
|
|
(80,763
|
)
|
|
|
(31,888
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
|
249,026
|
|
|
|
150,504
|
|
|
|
153,548
|
|
|
|
379,208
|
|
|
|
615,037
|
|
Obligation under capital lease
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
2,765
|
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B convertible
preferred stock
|
|
|
91,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
61,924
|
|
|
$
|
57,393
|
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
$
|
38,730
|
|
|
$
|
183,256
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
We adopted SFAS No. 142 in 2002 and ceased amortizing
goodwill as required by that standard. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our
audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and related notes included
in Part II Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
Overview
Our
History
We were incorporated in 1993 under the name of InfoTouch
Corporation with the objective of establishing an interactive
network of real estate kiosks for consumers to
search for homes. In 1996, we began to develop the technology to
build and operate real estate related Internet sites. In 1996,
we entered into a series of agreements with NAR and several
investors and transferred technology and assets to a
newly-formed subsidiary, which ultimately became RealSelect,
Inc. RealSelect, Inc. in turn entered into a number of formation
agreements with, and issued cash and common stock representing a
15% ownership interest in RealSelect, Inc. to, NAR in exchange
for the rights to operate the
REALTOR.com®
web site and pursue commercial opportunities relating to the
listing of real estate on the Internet. That 15% ownership in
RealSelect, Inc. was exchanged for stock in
Homestore.com®,
Inc. in August 1999. Our initial operating activities primarily
consisted of recruiting personnel, developing our web site
content and raising our initial capital and we began actively
marketing our advertising products and services to real estate
professionals in January 1997. We changed the corporate name to
Homestore.com®,
Inc. in August 1999. We changed our name to Homestore, Inc. in
May 2002. We announced our intention in February 2006 to change
our name in June to Move, Inc., subject to approval by our
shareholders at our next annual meeting.
26
Our
Business
We have created an online service that enables consumers to find
real estate listings and other content related to residential
real estate, moving and relocation. Our web sites collectively
have become the leading consumer destination on the Internet for
home and real estate-related information based on the number of
visitors, time spent on our web sites and number of property
listings. We generate most of our revenue from selling
advertising and marketing solutions to both real estate industry
participants, including real estate agents, homebuilders, and
rental property owners, and other local and national advertisers
interested in reaching our consumer audience before, during or
after a move. We also provide software solutions to real estate
agents to assist them in managing their client interactions and
architects home plans to consumers considering building a
new home. We derive all of our revenues from our North American
operations.
Our primary consumer web sites include
REALTOR.com®,
the official site of the NAR;
HomeBuilder.com®,
the official site of the NAHB;
RENTNET®.com,
an apartment, corporate housing and self store resource;
SeniorHousingNettm.com,
a comprehensive resource for seniors; and
Homestore.com®,
a home information resource site with an emphasis on content
related to mortgage financing, moving and storage, and home and
garden activities. During the second quarter of 2006, we intend
to launch
Move.comtm
as a real estate listing and move-related search site. Shortly
after its launch,
Move.comtm
will replace
HomeBuilder.com®,
RENTNET®.com
and
Homestore.com®
and we will begin promoting those under the MOVE brand.
Business
Trends and Conditions
In recent years, our business has been, and we expect will
continue to be, influenced by a number of macroeconomic,
industry-wide and product-specific trends and conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
Market and economic conditions. In recent
years, the U.S. economy has experienced low interest rates,
and volatility in the equities markets. Against this backdrop,
housing starts have remained strong, while the supply of
apartment housing has generally exceeded demand. The foregoing
conditions have meant that homebuilders spent less on
advertising, given the strong demand for new houses. Conversely,
apartment owners have not spent as much money on advertising, as
they have sought to achieve cost savings during the difficult
market for apartment owners. Both of these trends have impacted
our ability to grow our business. The impact of the recent rise
in interest rates on job creation and other economic factors is
difficult to gauge and creates uncertainty as to whether these
trends will continue. Some reports have forecasted that interest
rates will continue to rise and housing sales could slow down in
2006. This slow down could increase marketing spending on the
internet and provide us with opportunities for revenue growth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evolution of Our Product and Service Offerings and Pricing
Structures.
|
Real Estate Services segment: Our Real Estate
Services segment evolved as a business providing Internet
applications to real estate professionals. In recent years, it
became apparent that our customers valued the media exposure
that the Internet offered them, but not all of the
technology that we were offering. Many of our
customers objected to our proposition that they purchase our
templated web site in order to gain access to our networks. In
addition, we were charging a fixed price to all customers
regardless of the market they operated in or the size of their
business. Our Top
Producer®
product was a desktop application that required some knowledge
of the operations of a desktop computer.
In 2003, we responded to our customers needs and revamped
our service offerings. We began to price our services based on
the size of the market and the number of properties a customer
displayed. For many of our customers this change led to
substantial price increases over our former technology pricing.
This change has been reasonably well-accepted by our customers.
In late 2002, Top
Producer®
introduced a monthly subscription model of an online
application. This had a negative impact on our revenues over the
first eighteen months of this offering as we attempted to build
the subscriber base. While our desktop product was still
attractive to some real estate professionals, our customer base
has shifted to the online application and we believe it will
completely replace our desktop product this year.
27
Move-Related Services segment: The uncertain
economic conditions from early 2001 through 2003 had an adverse
effect on our Welcome
Wagon®
business. Our primary customers are small local merchants trying
to reach new movers and economic conditions have negatively
impacted the small business more than other businesses. These
economic conditions have caused a significant decline in our
revenue in this segment over the past three years. We are
starting to see some improvement in market conditions in some
geographic areas, but it could take considerable time before
this segment yields meaningful growth, if at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Strategy: We have made substantial
investments in our business in recent years in order to improve
our ability to bring consumers and advertisers together. As a
result of our greater understanding of both consumer and
customer needs, we have concluded that we need to demonstrate
strong capabilities in four core areas: size and quality of
consumer audience, dept and breadth of content, enduring
industry relationships, and scalable business models. We
recently announced significant changes to our branding, product
and pricing strategies to better align our solutions with these
core competencies.
|
Acquisitions
and Dispositions
On February 21, 2006, the Company acquired certain assets
and assumed certain liabilities of Moving.com, Inc. from TMP
Directional Marketing, LLC for approximately $9.0 million
in cash subject to certain post-closing adjustments. Moving.com
connects consumers with moving companies, van lines, truck
rental providers and self storage facilities.
On December 21, 2004, we entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement with Newstar Systems, Inc. (Newstar)
pursuant to which we agreed to sell our Computer for Tracts
(CFT) software business, which at the time had been
reported as part of our software segment, for a purchase price
of approximately $2.5 million in cash. The transaction
closed on December 21, 2004, resulting in a gain on
disposition of discontinued operations of approximately
$1.6 million.
On October 6, 2004, we entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement with Wyld Acquisition Corp. (Wyld), a
wholly owned subsidiary of Siegel Enterprises, Inc., pursuant to
which we agreed to sell our Wyldfyre software business, which at
the time had been reported as part of our software segment, for
a purchase price of $8.5 million in cash. The transaction
closed on October 6, 2004, resulting in a gain on
disposition of discontinued operations of $5.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004. The sale generated net
proceeds of approximately $7.0 million after transaction
fees and monies placed in escrow pursuant to the Asset Purchase
Agreement. In the fourth quarter of 2005, the entire amount of
the escrow fund, $0.9 million, was released and recognized
as Gain on disposition of discontinued operations
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Pursuant to SFAS No. 144, our Consolidated Financial
Statements for all periods presented reflect the disposition of
our Wyldfyre and CFT divisions as discontinued operations.
Accordingly, the revenue, costs and expenses, and cash flows of
these divisions have been excluded from the respective captions
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows and have been reported as Loss
from discontinued operations, net of applicable income
taxes of zero; and as Net cash provided by (used in)
discontinued operations. Total revenue and loss from
discontinued operations are reflected below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
9,137
|
|
|
$
|
12,788
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
9,816
|
|
|
|
16,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(679
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
The calculation of the gain on the sale of discontinued
operations is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Gross proceeds from sale
|
|
$
|
855
|
|
|
$
|
10,981
|
|
|
$
|
2,300
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash subject to escrow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Homestore stock received
from purchase of iPlace
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of
discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
855
|
|
|
$
|
7,294
|
|
|
$
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cash and stock received in the year ended December 31,
2003 from the purchase of iPlace relates to the settlement of
the original escrow related to our purchase of iPlace in 2001.
Critical
Accounting Policies, Estimates and Assumptions
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial
Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The
preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going
basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to
revenue recognition, uncollectible receivables, intangible and
other long-lived assets and contingencies. We base our estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions that
are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from
these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our
more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation
of our Consolidated Financial Statements: revenue recognition;
valuation allowances, specifically the allowance for doubtful
accounts; valuation of goodwill, identified intangibles and
other long-lived assets; accounting for business combinations;
and legal contingencies.
Management has discussed the development and selection of the
following critical accounting policies, estimates and
assumptions with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors
and the Audit Committee has reviewed these disclosures.
Revenue Recognition We derive our
revenue primarily from two sources:
|
|
|
|
|
software revenue, which includes software licenses and support
revenue which includes software maintenance, training,
consulting and web site hosting revenue; and
|
|
|
|
advertising revenue for running online advertising on our web
sites or offline advertising placed in our publications.
|
As described below, significant management judgments and
estimates must be made and used in connection with the revenue
recognized in any accounting period.
We recognize revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition, and
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (EITF) 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.
Revenue is recognized only when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been
rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collectibility
is reasonably assured.
We assess collection based on a number of factors, including
past transaction history with the customer and the credit
worthiness of the customer. We do not request collateral from
our customers. If we determine that collection of a fee is not
reasonably assured, we defer the fee and recognize revenue at
the time collection becomes reasonably
29
assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash. Cash received
in advance is recorded as deferred revenue until earned.
Software revenue We generally license
our software products in two ways:
|
|
|
|
|
on a one-year term basis; and
|
|
|
|
on a monthly subscription basis.
|
Our hosting arrangements require customers to pay a fixed fee
and receive service over a period of time, generally one year.
We apply the provisions of Statement of Position
(SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue
Recognition, as amended by
SOP 98-9
Modification of
SOP 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain
Transactions, to all transactions involving the sale of
software. Software license revenue is recognized upon all of the
following criteria being satisfied:
|
|
|
|
|
the execution of a license agreement;
|
|
|
|
product delivery;
|
|
|
|
fees are fixed or determinable;
|
|
|
|
collectibility is reasonably assured; and
|
|
|
|
all other significant obligations have been fulfilled.
|
For arrangements containing multiple elements, such as software
license fees, consulting services and maintenance, and where
vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair
value exists for all undelivered elements, we account for the
delivered elements in accordance with the residual
method prescribed by
SOP 98-9.
For arrangements in which VSOE does not exist for the
undelivered element, including specified upgrades, revenue is
deferred and not recognized until either VSOE is established or
delivery of the element without VSOE has occurred. Our
arrangements generally do not include acceptance clauses.
However, if an arrangement includes an acceptance clause,
acceptance occurs upon the earlier of receipt of a written
customer acceptance or expiration of the acceptance period.
Revenue for maintenance services are recognized ratably over the
contract term. Certain software products are sold as
subscriptions, and accordingly, revenue is deferred and
recognized ratably over the term of the contract which is
typically based on a one-year renewable term.
Advertising Revenue We sell online and
offline advertising. Online advertising revenue includes three
revenue streams:
|
|
|
|
|
impression based;
|
|
|
|
fixed fee subscriptions; and
|
|
|
|
variable, performance based agreements.
|
The impressions based agreements range from spot purchases to
12 month contracts. The impression based revenue is
recognized based upon actual impressions delivered and viewed by
a user in a period. The fixed fee subscription revenue is
recognized ratably over the period in which the services are
provided. We measure performance related to advertising
obligations on a monthly basis prior to the recording of
revenue. Offline advertising revenue is recognized when the
publications in which the advertising is displayed are shipped.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Our estimate for the allowance for doubtful accounts related to
trade receivables is based on two methods. The amounts
calculated from each of these methods are combined to determine
the total amount to be reserved. First, we evaluate specific
accounts where we have information that the customer may have an
inability to meet its financial obligations. In these cases, we
use our judgment, based on the best available facts and
circumstances, and record a specific reserve for that customer
against amounts due to reduce the receivable to the amount that
is expected to be collected. These specific reserves are
reevaluated and adjusted as additional information is received
that impacts the
30
amount reserved. Second, an additional reserve is established
for all customers based on a range of percentages applied to
aging categories. These percentages are based on historical
collection and write-off experience. If circumstances change
(i.e. higher than expected defaults or an unexpected material
adverse change in a major customers ability to meet its
financial obligation to us) our estimates of the recoverability
of amounts due to us could be reduced or increased by a material
amount.
Valuation
of Goodwill, Identified Intangibles and Other Long-lived
Assets
We test goodwill for impairment in accordance with
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets and test intangible assets and property, plant and
equipment for impairment in accordance with
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. We assess the impairment of
goodwill, identifiable intangible assets and other long-lived
assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider
important which could trigger an impairment review include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
a significant decline in actual and projected revenue;
|
|
|
|
a significant decline in the market value of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
a significant decline in performance of certain acquired
companies relative to their original projection;
|
|
|
|
a significant difference between our net book value and our
market value;
|
|
|
|
a significant decline in our operating results relative to our
operating forecasts;
|
|
|
|
a loss of key customer relationships coupled with the
renegotiation of existing arrangements;
|
|
|
|
a significant change in the manner of our use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business;
|
|
|
|
a significant decrease in the market value of an asset;
|
|
|
|
a shift in technology demands and development; and
|
|
|
|
a significant turnover in key management or other personnel.
|
When we determine that the carrying value of goodwill, other
intangible assets and other long lived assets may not be
recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above
indicators of impairment, we measure any impairment based on a
projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate
determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk
inherent in our current business model. In each of the third and
fourth quarters of 2003, we recognized an impairment of our
long-lived assets. See Note 5, Impairment of
Long-lived Assets, to our Consolidated Financial
Statements contained in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
We adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, in January 2002. Under
SFAS No. 142, goodwill is no longer amortized, but is
tested for impairment at a reporting unit level on an annual
basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the
fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value amount.
Events or circumstances which could trigger an impairment review
include a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the
business climate, an adverse action or assessment by a
regulator, unanticipated competition, a loss of key personnel,
significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business, significant
negative industry or economic trends, significant declines in
our stock price for a sustained period or significant
underperformance relative to expected historical or projected
future operating results.
In testing for a potential impairment of goodwill, we first
compare the estimated fair value of each reporting unit with
book value, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value
exceeds book value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired
and no additional steps are necessary. If, however, the fair
value of the respective reporting unit is less than book value,
then we are required to compare the carrying amount of the
goodwill with its implied fair value. The estimate of implied
fair value of goodwill may require independent valuations of
certain internally generated and unrecognized intangible assets
such as our subscriber base, software and technology and patents
and trademarks. If the carrying amount of our goodwill exceeds
the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss
would be recognized in an amount equal to the excess.
31
Legal
Contingencies
We are currently involved in certain legal proceedings, as
discussed in Note 21, Settlements of Disputes and
Litigations and Note 22, Commitments and
Contingencies Legal Proceedings to our
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
For those matters where we have reached agreed-upon settlements,
we have estimated the amount of those settlements and accrued
the amount of the settlement in our financial statements.
Because of the uncertainties related to both the amount and
range of loss on the remaining pending litigation, we are unable
to make a reasonable estimate of the liability that could result
from an unfavorable outcome. As additional information becomes
available, we will assess the potential liability related to our
pending litigation and revise our estimates. Such revisions in
our estimates of the potential liability could materially impact
our results of operations and financial position.
Results
of Operations
We have only a limited operating history, and our business model
has been modified over the past three years. We have also
recently announced additional changes to our business model. Our
prospects should be considered in light of the risks,
uncertainties, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered
by companies in their early stages of development, particularly
companies in new and rapidly evolving markets such as the
Internet. To address these risks, we must, among other things,
be able to continue to:
|
|
|
|
|
execute our business model, including the recently announced
changes to that model;
|
|
|
|
respond to highly competitive developments;
|
|
|
|
attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel;
|
|
|
|
implement and successfully execute our marketing plans;
|
|
|
|
continue to upgrade our technologies;
|
|
|
|
develop new distribution channels; and
|
|
|
|
improve our operational and financial systems.
|
Although our revenue grew significantly in our early history,
only recently have we have been able to begin to again generate
growth. Therefore, you should not consider our historical growth
indicative of future revenue levels or operating results. In
order to reduce our operating cost structure to a sustainable
level commensurate with our revenues, we have gone through four
restructurings during the last four years. We have achieved net
income in a few
32
recent quarters, but we may not be able to sustain it. A more
complete description of other risks relating to our business is
set forth in Part I Item 1A.
Risk Factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Consolidated Statement of
Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue(1)
|
|
$
|
252,622
|
|
|
$
|
216,860
|
|
|
$
|
198,227
|
|
Related party revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
252,622
|
|
|
|
216,860
|
|
|
|
205,922
|
|
Cost of revenue(1)
|
|
|
56,188
|
|
|
|
50,829
|
|
|
|
56,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
196,434
|
|
|
|
166,031
|
|
|
|
149,353
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing(1)
|
|
|
91,071
|
|
|
|
88,388
|
|
|
|
101,122
|
|
Product and web site development(1)
|
|
|
22,059
|
|
|
|
15,362
|
|
|
|
17,065
|
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
82,545
|
|
|
|
68,442
|
|
|
|
65,333
|
|
Amortization of intangible
assets(1)
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
7,894
|
|
|
|
21,863
|
|
Restructuring charges(1)
|
|
|
(1,331
|
)
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,999
|
|
Litigation settlement
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
63,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
199,718
|
|
|
|
183,570
|
|
|
|
300,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(3,284
|
)
|
|
|
(17,539
|
)
|
|
|
(150,729
|
)
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
(406
|
)
|
Gain on settlement of distribution
agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,071
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
2,366
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
(14,501
|
)
|
|
|
(46,373
|
)
|
Gain on disposition of
discontinued operations
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
7,294
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(679
|
)
|
|
|
(3,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
(7,886
|
)
|
|
|
(47,124
|
)
|
Convertible preferred stock
dividend
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
(7,886
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The following chart summarizes the stock-based charges that have
been included in the following captions for the periods
presented: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
Product and web site development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,115
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
$
|
7,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
As a Percentage of
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
Related party revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Product and web site development
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Litigation settlement
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on settlement of distribution
agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Gain on disposition of
discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Convertible preferred stock
dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to
common stockholders
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(4
|
) %
|
|
|
(23
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
For the
Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
Revenue
and Related Party Revenue
Revenue increased approximately $35.8 million, or 16%, to
$252.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
from revenue of $216.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The increase in revenue was due to
increases of $33.0 million in the Real Estate Services
segment and $2.8 million in the Move-Related Services
segment. These increases by segment are explained in the segment
information below.
Cost
of Revenue
Cost of revenue increased approximately $5.4 million, or
11%, to $56.2 million for the year ended December 31,
2005 from $50.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The increase was primarily due to
increases in personnel related costs of $2.1 million,
increases in material and shipping costs of $2.7 million,
increases in hosting and imaging costs of $1.0 million, and
other cost increases of $1.1 million, offset by a
$1.5 million decrease in royalties resulting from
renegotiated contracts.
Gross margin percentage for the year ended December 31,
2005 was 78%, compared to 77% for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The increase in gross margin percentage
was primarily due to the factors mentioned above.
Operating
Expenses
We have provided the major categories of changes in each of our
operating expenses so our investors can better understand our
operating expense structure.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing
expenses, including non-cash stock-based charges, increased
approximately $2.7 million, or 3%, to $91.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
$88.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The overall increase was primarily due to increases in personnel
related costs of $5.0 million and increased marketing costs
of $1.2 million, offset by reduced online and portal costs
of $2.9 million due to renegotiated agreements and other
cost reductions of $0.6 million.
Product and Web site Development. Product and
web site development expenses increased approximately
$6.7 million, or 44%, to $22.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005 from $15.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004. The increase was primarily
due to an increase in consulting and personnel related costs to
improve our product offerings in our
HomeBuilder.com®,
RENTNET®,
Top
Producer®,
and Welcome
Wagon®
businesses.
General and Administrative. General and
administrative expenses, including non-cash stock-based charges,
increased approximately $14.1 million, or 21%, to
$82.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
from $68.4 million for the year ended December 31,
2004. As a result of our obligation to advance expenses
(including attorneys fees) to, and in certain cases
indemnify, our former officers and the resulting settlement
agreements with certain of these former officers as discussed in
Note 21 Settlements of Disputes and Litigation
and Note 22 Commitments and Contingencies, to
our audited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K,
we recorded $15.6 million in expenses during the year ended
December 31, 2005 compared to $7.2 million during the
year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of
$8.4 million. There were also increases in personnel
related costs of $4.5 million and consulting costs of
$3.7 million resulting from various corporate projects
including the implementation of a new enterprise resource
planning system and the planning of the relocation of our data
center. These increases were offset by a $1.6 million
reduction in accounting fees as the cost of compliance with
Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley and associated audit costs
were reduced during our second year of complying and other cost
decreases of $0.9 million. Our general and administrative
expenses continue to be larger as a percentage of our revenues
than many companies of our size. These expenses have been
impacted by our legal costs as well as our continuing costs of
compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
legislation. We will continue to focus on reducing these
expenses, but some of these costs, such as our corporate office
costs, may not be reduced for a number of years.
35
Amortization of Intangible
Assets. Amortization of intangible assets was
$3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
compared to $7.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The decrease in amortization was due to
certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized during 2005.
Restructuring Charges. We recorded a
$1.3 million reduction to our restructuring charges for the
year ended December 31, 2005 as a result of changes in
estimates for previous restructuring plans. These changes
resulted primarily from a decrease in the estimate for charges
related to our San Francisco office space and a change in
the exchange rates decreasing our Canadian lease obligation as
well as other revisions of estimated contractual liabilities.
Restructuring charges were $1.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 as a result of revisions to estimates of
our sublease assumptions of our remaining San Francisco
office space and changes in the exchange rates for our Canadian
lease. There were no new restructuring plans approved during the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
Litigation Settlement. We recorded litigation
settlement charges of $1.8 million and $2.2 million
for the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31,
2004, respectively. These settlements are discussed in
Note 22, Settlements of Disputes and Litigation
to our audited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
Stock-based Charges. The following chart
summarizes the stock-based charges that have been included in
the following captions for each of the periods presented (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
$
|
291
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,115
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based charges remained relatively consistent, increasing
by $296,000, to $1.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005 compared to $0.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004.
Interest
Income, Net
Interest income, net, increased $1.7 million to net
interest income of $2.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005 from net interest income of $672,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2004, primarily due to
increases in short-term investment balances and higher interest
rates on those balances.
Other
Income, Net
Other income, net, decreased $1.7 million to net other
income of $623,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005
compared to net other income of $2.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 primarily due to a
$1.4 million gain realized on the sale of an office
building owned by the Company during the year ended
December 31, 2004. There was no sale of assets of similar
magnitude during the year ended December 31, 2005.
Gain
on Disposition of Discontinued Operations and Loss from
Discontinued Operations
On October 6, 2004, we sold our Wyldfyre division for
$8.5 million in cash and recorded a gain on disposition of
discontinued operations of $5.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004. On December 21, 2004, we sold our
Computers for Tracts division for $2.5 million and recorded
a gain on disposition of discontinued operations of
$1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. In
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the
Consolidated Financial Statements reflect these as discontinued
operations. The results of operations for the Wyldfyre and
Computer for Tracts divisions included operating losses of
$679,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004. During the
year ended December 31, 2005, we recorded a gain on
disposition of discontinued operations of $855,000 as a result
of the release of escrowed funds related to the sale of Wyldfyre.
36
Income
Taxes
As a result of operating losses and our inability to recognize a
benefit from our deferred tax assets, we have not recorded a
provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31,
2005 and December 31, 2004. As of December 31, 2005,
we had $1,012.6 million of net operating loss carryforwards
for federal and foreign income tax purposes, which expire
beginning in 2008. We have provided a full valuation allowance
on our deferred tax assets, consisting primarily of net
operating loss carryforwards, due to the likelihood that we may
not generate sufficient taxable income during the carry-forward
period to utilize the net operating loss carryforwards.
Segment
Information
Segment information is presented in accordance with
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. This standard is based
on a management approach, which requires segmentation based upon
our internal organization and disclosure of revenue and
operating expenses based upon internal accounting methods.
During the fourth quarter of 2005, we revised our business
segments to align with the way we are approaching the market:
Real Estate Services for those products and services offered to
industry professionals trying to reach new movers and
Move-Related Services for those products and services offered to
other advertisers who are trying to reach those consumers in the
process of a move. As a result of these changes, we evaluate
performance and allocate resources based on these two segments.
We have reclassified previously reported segment data to conform
to the current period presentation. This is consistent with the
data that is made available to our management to assess
performance and make decisions.
The expenses presented below for each of the business segments
include an allocation of certain corporate expenses that are
identifiable and benefit those segments and are allocated for
internal management reporting purposes. The unallocated expenses
are those corporate overhead expenses that are not directly
attributable to a segment and include: corporate expenses, such
as finance, legal, internal business systems, and human
resources; amortization of intangible assets; litigation
settlement charges; impairment charges; stock-based charges; and
acquisition and restructuring charges. There is no inter-segment
revenue. Assets and liabilities are not fully allocated to
segments for internal reporting purposes.
Summarized information by segment as excerpted from internal
management reports is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2005
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2004
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Move-Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Move-Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
181,324
|
|
|
$
|
71,298
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
252,622
|
|
|
$
|
148,359
|
|
|
$
|
68,501
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
216,860
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
27,902
|
|
|
|
26,346
|
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
56,188
|
|
|
|
28,213
|
|
|
|
21,784
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
50,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
153,422
|
|
|
|
44,952
|
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
196,434
|
|
|
|
120,146
|
|
|
|
46,717
|
|
|
|
(832
|
)
|
|
|
166,031
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
60,125
|
|
|
|
29,644
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
91,071
|
|
|
|
59,039
|
|
|
|
28,637
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
88,388
|
|
Product and web site development
|
|
|
15,922
|
|
|
|
3,755
|
|
|
|
2,382
|
|
|
|
22,059
|
|
|
|
13,425
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
15,362
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
22,750
|
|
|
|
12,832
|
|
|
|
46,963
|
|
|
|
82,545
|
|
|
|
21,033
|
|
|
|
12,373
|
|
|
|
35,036
|
|
|
|
68,442
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,894
|
|
|
|
7,894
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,331
|
)
|
|
|
(1,331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
Litigation settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
98,797
|
|
|
|
46,231
|
|
|
|
54,690
|
|
|
|
199,718
|
|
|
|
93,497
|
|
|
|
42,946
|
|
|
|
47,127
|
|
|
|
183,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
54,625
|
|
|
$
|
(1,279
|
)
|
|
$
|
(56,630
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,284
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,649
|
|
|
$
|
3,771
|
|
|
$
|
(47,959
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,539
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
Estate Services
Real Estate Services consists of products and services that
promote and connect real estate professionals to consumers
through our
REALTOR.com®,
HomeBuilder.com®,
RENTNET®
and
SeniorHousingNettm.com
web sites, in addition to our customer relationship management
applications for
REALTORS®
offered through our Top
Producer®
business. Our revenue is derived from a variety of advertising
and software services, including enhanced
37
listings, company and property display advertising, customer
relationship management applications and web site sales which we
sell to those businesses interested in reaching our targeted
audience or those professionals interested in being more
effective in managing their contact with consumers.
Real Estate Services revenue increased approximately
$33.0 million, or 22%, to $181.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005, compared to $148.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2004. The revenue increase
was primarily generated by a $28.3 million increase in our
REALTOR.com®
business driven by increased customer count and higher average
spending per customer on our Enhanced Listings Product and a
$7.2 million increase in our Top
Producer®
product offerings as our subscriber base for the on- line
software continues to grow. These increases were partially
offset by a reduction in revenue from our
HomeBuilder.com®
and
RENTNET®
businesses of $2.4 million. Real Estate Services revenue
represented approximately 72% of total revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2005 compared to 68% of the total
revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Real Estate Services expenses increased $5.0 million, or
4%, to $126.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2005 from $121.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The increase was primarily due to a
$6.7 million increase in personnel related costs resulting
from increased sales and product development efforts and other
operating cost increases of $1.5 million, offset by a
$1.6 million reduction in royalty expense and a
$1.6 million reduction in online distribution costs related
to new agreements.
Real Estate Services generated operating income of
$54.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
compared to operating income of $26.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 primarily due to the significant
growth in revenues. We have announced plans for additional
investments in our
HomeBuilder.com®
and
RENTNET®
businesses that could negatively impact our operating income in
this segment in the near future. We continue to seek increased
revenue through new product offerings and new market
opportunities.
Move-Related
Services
Move-Related Services consists of advertising products and lead
generation tools including display, test-link and rich
advertising positions, directory products, price quote tools and
content sponsorships on
Homestore.com®
and other related sites which we sell to those businesses
interested in reaching our targeted audience. In addition, it
includes our Welcome
Wagon®
new-mover direct mail advertising products and the sales of new
home plans and related magazines through our Homestore Plans and
Publications business.
Move-Related Services revenue increased $2.8 million, or
4%, to $71.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2005, compared to $68.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The increase was primarily generated in
our Welcome
Wagon®
business through new product offerings, including Early
Advantagetm
which was introduced in late 2004 and the National Book
introduced in the fourth quarter of 2005, as well as continued
growth in our Pinpoint product. Our on-line advertising revenue
increased $1.4 million, offset by a $1.0 million
reduction in revenues generated by home plans. Move-Related
Services revenue represented approximately 28% of total revenue
for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to 32% of
total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Move-Related Services expenses increased $7.8 million, or
12%, to $72.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2005 from $64.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The increase was primarily due to
increased cost of sales of $4.6 million associated with the
new products described above, increased product development
costs of $1.8 million as investments are being made to
create new on-line consumer products, increased personnel
related costs in sales and marketing of $2.7 million,
offset by a $1.3 million reduction in online marketing and
portal fees.
Move-Related Services generated an operating loss of
$1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
compared to operating income of $3.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 primarily due to factors outlined
above. We have announced plans for additional investments in our
Welcome
Wagon®
business that could negatively impact our operating results in
this segment in the near future. We continue to seek increased
revenue through new product offerings and new market
opportunities. We expect that our recent acquisition of
Moving.com will contribute to increased revenue in this segment
in 2006, but may not contribute to profitability.
38
Unallocated
Unallocated expenses increased $8.7 million, or 18%, to
$56.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
from $48.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2004. As a result of our obligation to advance expenses
(including attorneys fees) to, and in certain cases
indemnify, our former officers and the resulting settlement
agreements with certain of these former officers as discussed in
Note 21 Settlements of Disputes and Litigation,
and Note 22, Commitments and Contingencies, to
our audited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K,
we recorded $15.6 million in expenses during the year ended
December 31, 2005 compared to $7.2 million in expenses
during the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of
$8.4 million. There were increases in consulting and
personnel related costs of $7.5 resulting from various
corporate projects including the implementation of a new
enterprise resource planning system and the planning of the
relocation of our data center as well as other cost increases of
$1.3 million, offset by a $4.3 million decrease in
amortization as certain intangibles became fully amortized
during 2005, a $2.6 million reduction in restructuring
charges and a $1.6 million reduction in accounting fees as
the cost of compliance with Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley
and associated audit costs were reduced during our second year
of complying. We continue to seek reductions in our corporate
overhead expenses but cannot provide assurances that reductions
will be achieved.
For the
Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
Revenue
and Related Party Revenue
Revenue, including non-cash stock-based charges, increased
approximately $10.9 million, or 5%, to $216.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2004 from revenue of
$205.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
The increase in revenue was due to increases of
$6.2 million in the Real Estate Services segment and
$4.7 million in the Move-Related Services segment. These
increases by segment are explained in the segment information
below.
Cost
of Revenue
Cost of revenue, including non-cash stock-based charges,
decreased approximately $5.7 million, or 10%, to
$50.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
from $56.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2003. The decrease was primarily due to our continued cost
cutting efforts over the past three years that resulted in
restructuring charges in the first and third quarters of 2002
and the fourth quarter of 2003. The reductions consisted of
decreases in personnel related costs of $1.7 million and
decreases in royalties and fees of $4.9 million, partially
offset by increases in other direct costs of $0.9 million.
The decrease in royalties and fees was primarily due to the Real
Estate Services segment renewing its contracts with MLSs
on terms that did not require us to pay future royalties.
Gross margin percentage for the year ended December 31,
2004 was 77%, compared to 73% for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The increase in gross margin percentage
was primarily due to the factors mentioned above.
Operating
Expenses
We have provided the major categories of changes in each of our
operating expenses so our investors can better understand our
operating expense structure.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing
expenses, including non-cash stock-based charges, decreased
approximately $12.7 million, or 13%, to $88.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2004 from
$101.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
The overall decrease was primarily due to reductions in
personnel related costs of $2.8 million due to our
restructuring efforts, reductions in stock based charges of
$4.6 million due to the expiration of previous marketing
agreements, reductions in online marketing and portal costs of
$2.6 million due to renegotiated agreements, reductions in
depreciation expense of $1.4 million due to certain assets
being fully depreciated, and other cost reductions of
$1.3 million.
Product and Web site Development. Product and
web site development expenses, including non-cash stock-based
charges, decreased approximately $1.7 million, or 10%, to
$15.4 million for the year ended December 31,
39
2004 from $17.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The decrease was primarily due to
decreases in personnel related costs of $1.0 million due to
our restructuring efforts and other cost reductions of
$0.7 million.
General and Administrative. General and
administrative expenses, including non-cash stock-based charges,
increased approximately $3.1 million, or 5%, to
$68.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
from $65.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2003. The increase was primarily due to a $7.2 million loss
contingency accrual for the potential advancement of legal costs
of former officers and directors and increases in accounting
fees of $2.6 million primarily due to the cost of
compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
These increases were offset by decreases in personnel related
costs of $4.3 million due to our restructuring efforts,
decreases in bad debt expense of $1.9 million resulting
from a closer alignment between our sales force compensation and
tighter credit and collection policies, and other operating cost
decreases of $0.5 million. Our general and administrative
expenses continue to be larger as a percentage of our revenues
than many companies of our size. These expenses have been
impacted by our legal costs as well as our costs to prepare for
compliance in 2004 with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act. We will continue to focus on reducing these expenses, but
some of these costs, such as our corporate office costs, may not
be reduced for a number of years and some, like our legal
expense, are not totally within our control.
Amortization of Intangible
Assets. Amortization of intangible assets was
$7.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to $21.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The decrease in amortization was due to
the impairment of intangible assets charges under SFAS Nos.
144 and 142, during the year ended December 31, 2003 as
well as certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized
during 2004.
Restructuring Charges. Restructuring charges
were $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
as a result of revisions to estimates of our sublease
assumptions of our remaining San Francisco office space and
changes in the exchange rates for our Canadian lease. There were
no new restructuring plans approved during the year ended
December 31, 2004.
Restructuring charges were $4.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003, related to restructuring plans approved
in fourth quarter of 2003. As part of this restructuring and
integration plan, we undertook a review of our existing
operations and elected to change our management structure and
identified and notified approximately 95 employees whose
positions with the Company were eliminated. The work force
reductions affected approximately 7 in research and development,
17 in production, 37 in sales and marketing and 34 in
administrative functions resulting in a charge of
$3.5 million. In addition, we revised estimates on previous
restructuring plans and recorded an additional charge of
$560,000 to properly reflect our current estimates. The primary
factor in this change in estimate was the continued slow demand
for office space in San Francisco where we still have one
floor of a large facility available for sublease.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets. In
conjunction with certain business units continuing to perform
below our expectations, as required by SFAS Nos. 144 and
142, we performed an impairment analysis as of
September 30, 2003. Our analysis resulted in a charge of
$13.0 million comprised of impairments of
$11.7 million of identifiable intangible assets relating to
our acquisitions of SpringStreet and Move.com, Inc., and
$1.3 million of prepaid distribution expense. In addition,
in conjunction with the settlement of the dispute with Cendant,
we relinquished certain exclusive data rights and other rights.
As a result, certain intangible assets associated with those
rights no longer have value to us and, accordingly, we recorded
an impairment charge of $12.2 million. Both charges were
recorded in the quarter ended September 30, 2003. In the
fourth quarter of 2003, specific events and changes in
circumstances indicated a potential impairment. Those specific
events included Homestore revising its implementation plan of
its enterprise resource planning system. As a result of the
revision, the decision was made to terminate the implementation
of one aspect of the application. This decision resulted in a
charge of $1.8 million. There were no impairment charges
for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Litigation Settlement. We recorded a
litigation settlement charge of $2.2 million in our
operating results for the year ended December 31, 2004.
During 2003, we reached a settlement in the Securities
Class Action Lawsuit and recorded a charge of
$63.6 million.
40
Stock-based Charges. The following chart
summarizes the stock-based charges that have been included in
the following captions for each of the periods presented (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
Product and web site development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
$
|
7,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based charges decreased by $6.4 million to
$0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 from
$7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The
decrease was primarily due to the termination of the previous
agreement with AOL.
Interest
Income (Expense), Net
Interest income (expense), net, increased $1.1 million to
income of $672,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004,
from net expense of $406,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2003, primarily due to increases in short-term
investment balances and higher interest rates on those balances.
Gain
on Settlement of Distribution Agreement
In 2003, we entered into a new marketing agreement with AOL that
resolved our dispute with AOL and terminated our obligations
under the old agreement. In connection with the settlement, we
reduced our accrued distribution obligation and other accrued
liabilities by $189.9 million and $4.2 million,
respectively, and allowed AOL to fully draw down on an existing
$90.0 million letter of credit secured by restricted cash.
Accordingly, we recorded a gain on settlement of the
distribution agreement of $104.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. There were no similar transactions in
2004.
Other
Income, Net
Other income, net, increased $1.7 million to
$2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to $691,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003
primarily due to a $1.4 million gain realized on the sale
of an office building owned by the Company and a $400,000 gain
on the sale of other assets.
Gain
on Disposition of Discontinued Operations and Loss from
Discontinued Operations
On October 6, 2004, we sold our Wyldfyre division for
$8.5 million in cash and recorded a gain on disposition of
discontinued operations of $5.7 million. On
December 21, 2004, we sold our Computers for Tracts
division for $2.5 million and recorded a gain on
disposition of discontinued operations of $1.6 million. In
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the
Consolidated Financial Statements reflect these as discontinued
operations. The results of operations for the Wyldfyre and
Computer for Tracts divisions included operating losses of
$679,000 and $3.3 million for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
On April 2, 2002, we sold our ConsumerInfo division for
$130.0 million in cash to Experian. We recorded a gain on
disposition of discontinued operations of $2.5 million
during the year ended December 31, 2003, as a result of our
receipt of cash and stock valued at $230,000 released from the
escrow related to our purchase of iPlace (of which our
ConsumerInfo division was formerly a subsidiary) and our receipt
of $2.3 million in cash from the escrow related to the sale
of our ConsumerInfo division.
41
Income
Taxes
As a result of operating losses and our inability to recognize a
benefit from our deferred tax assets, we have not recorded a
provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31,
2004 and December 31, 2003. We have provided a full
valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets, consisting
primarily of net operating loss carryforwards, due to the
likelihood that we may not generate sufficient taxable income
during the carry-forward period to utilize the net operating
loss carryforwards.
Segment
Information
Segment information is presented in accordance with
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. This standard is based
on a management approach, which requires segmentation based upon
our internal organization and disclosure of revenue and
operating expenses based upon internal accounting methods.
During the fourth quarter of 2005, we revised our business
segments to align with the way we are approaching the market:
Real Estate Services for those products and services offered by
industry professionals trying to reach new movers and
Move-Related Services for those products and services offered to
other advertisers who are trying to reach those consumers in the
process of a move. As a result of these changes, we evaluate
performance and allocate resources based on two segments,
consisting of Real Estate Services and Move-Related Services. We
have reclassified previously reported segment data to conform to
the current period presentation. This is consistent with the
data that is made available to our management to assess
performance and make decisions.
The expenses presented below for each of the business segments
include an allocation of certain corporate expenses that are
identifiable and benefit those segments and are allocated for
internal management reporting purposes. The unallocated expenses
are those corporate overhead expenses that are not directly
attributable to a segment and include: corporate expenses, such
as finance, legal, internal business systems, and human
resources; amortization of intangible assets; litigation
settlement charges; impairment charges; stock-based charges; and
acquisition and restructuring charges. There is no inter-segment
revenue. Assets and liabilities are not fully allocated to
segments for internal reporting purposes.
Summarized information by segment as excerpted from internal
management reports is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2004
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2003
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Move-Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Move-Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
148,359
|
|
|
$
|
68,501
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
216,860
|
|
|
$
|
142,183
|
|
|
$
|
63,739
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
205,922
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
28,213
|
|
|
|
21,784
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
50,829
|
|
|
|
33,779
|
|
|
|
21,381
|
|
|
|
1,409
|
|
|
|
56,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
120,146
|
|
|
|
46,717
|
|
|
|
(832
|
)
|
|
|
166,031
|
|
|
|
108,404
|
|
|
|
42,358
|
|
|
|
(1,409
|
)
|
|
|
149,353
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
59,039
|
|
|
|
28,637
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
88,388
|
|
|
|
65,547
|
|
|
|
29,606
|
|
|
|
5,969
|
|
|
|
101,122
|
|
Product and web site development
|
|
|
13,425
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
15,362
|
|
|
|
15,115
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
17,065
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
21,033
|
|
|
|
12,373
|
|
|
|
35,036
|
|
|
|
68,442
|
|
|
|
21,854
|
|
|
|
12,767
|
|
|
|
30,712
|
|
|
|
65,333
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,894
|
|
|
|
7,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,863
|
|
|
|
21,863
|
|
Litigation settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,600
|
|
|
|
63,600
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,999
|
|
|
|
26,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
93,497
|
|
|
|
42,946
|
|
|
|
47,127
|
|
|
|
183,570
|
|
|
|
102,516
|
|
|
|
44,302
|
|
|
|
153,264
|
|
|
|
300,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
26,649
|
|
|
$
|
3,771
|
|
|
$
|
(47,959
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,539
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,888
|
|
|
$
|
(1,944
|
)
|
|
$
|
(154,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
(150,729
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
Real
Estate Services
Real Estate Services consists of products and services that
promote and connect real estate professionals to consumers
through our
REALTOR.com®,
HomeBuilder.com®,
RENTNET®
and
SeniorHousingNettm.com
web sites, in addition to our customer relationship management
applications for
REALTORS®
offered through our Top
Producer®
business. Our revenue is derived from a variety of advertising
services, including enhanced listings, banner ads, sponsorships
and other promotions of services which we sell to those
businesses interested in reaching our targeted audience or those
professionals interested in being more effective in managing
their contacts with customers.
Real Estate Services revenue increased approximately
$6.2 million, or 4%, to $148.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004, compared to $142.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 2003. The revenue increase
was primarily generated by a $7.8 million increase in our
REALTOR.combusiness driven by increased customer count and
higher average spending per customer on our Enhanced Listings
Products and a $3.2 million increase in our Top
Producer®
product offerings as our subscriber base for the on-line
software continues to grow since its launch in late 2002. These
increases were partially offset by a reduction in revenue from
our
HomeBuilder.com®
and
RENTNET®
businesses of $4.8 million. Real Estate Services revenue
represented approximately 68% of total revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2004 compared to 69% of the total
revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Real Estate Services expenses decreased $14.6 million, or
11%, to $121.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2004 from $136.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The decrease was primarily due to
decreases in personnel related costs of $7.4 million due to
our restructuring efforts, cost of revenue savings of
$4.4 million due to a reduction in royalty expense
resulting from new MLS agreements eliminating the requirement
for future royalties, sales and marketing savings of
$1.0 million due to reduced marketing spending, and general
and administrative savings of $2.6 million due to improved
collections resulting in lower bad debt expense. These decreases
were partially offset by other operating expense increases of
$0.8 million.
Real Estate Services generated operating income of
$26.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to operating income of $5.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003 primarily due to factors outlined
above.
Move-Related
Services
Move-Related Services consists of advertising products and
services on
Homestore.com®
and other related sites including a variety of advertising
services, including banner ads, sponsorships, integrated content
and text-based links and rich media applications which we sell
to those businesses interested in reaching our targeted
audience. In addition, it includes our Welcome
Wagon®
new-mover advertising products and the sale of new home plans
and related magazines through our Homestore Plans and
Publications business.
Move-Related Services revenue increased $4.8 million, or
7%, to $68.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2004, compared to $63.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The increase was primarily due to a
$3.6 million increase in advertising revenues with the
remaining increase resulting from the new Pinpoint product
introduced by Welcome
Wagon®
in early 2003. Move-Related Services revenue represented
approximately 32% of total revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2004, compared to 31% of total revenue for the
year ended December 31, 2003.
Move-Related Services expenses decreased $1.0 million, or
1%, to $64.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2004 from $65.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The decrease was primarily due to lower
online marketing and portal fees.
Move-Related Services generated operating income of
$3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to an operating loss of $1.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003 primarily due to the factors
outlined above.
43
Unallocated
Unallocated expenses decreased $106.7 million, or 69% to
$48.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
from $154.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2003. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in litigation
settlement charges of $61.4 million, impairment of
long-lived assets of $27.0 million, amortization of
intangibles of $14.0 million due to the impairment charges
taken in 2003 as well as certain intangible assets becoming
fully amortized during 2004, sales and marketing savings of
$5.3 million primarily due to reduced stock based charges
as a direct result of the settlement of our agreement with AOL,
$4.2 million in reduced personnel related costs due to our
restructuring efforts, $2.8 million in reduced
restructuring charges, $1.6 million in reduced depreciation
expense as certain assets have become fully depreciated during
2004, and other operating cost reductions of $0.2 million.
These reductions were offset by our $7.2 million accrual
for the potential advancement of legal costs of former officers
and directors and $2.6 million in increased accounting fees
primarily due to the cost of compliance with Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities of
$6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 was
attributable to the net loss from continuing operations of
$0.3 million, offset by non-cash expenses including
depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, provision for
doubtful accounts and stock-based charges, aggregating to
$13.0 million and increased by the gain on sale of fixed
assets and other non-cash items of $0.3 million. Reducing
the cash provided by continuing operating activities were the
changes in operating assets and liabilities of approximately
$5.8 million, primarily driven by a $4.2 million
increase in accounts receivable resulting from new product
offerings.
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities of
$9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
attributable to the net loss from continuing operations of
$14.5 million, offset by non-cash expenses including
depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, provision for
doubtful accounts, stock-based charges and other non-cash items,
aggregating to $16.9 million and increased by the gain on
sale of fixed assets of $2.2 million. Increasing the cash
provided by continuing operating activities were the changes in
operating assets and liabilities of approximately
$9.4 million. These changes were primarily the result of
the accrual of the legal costs associated with former officers
and directors and the settlement of the AOL agreement.
Net cash used in investing activities of $105.0 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005 was attributable to
purchases of short- term investments of $116.3 million and
increased capital expenditures of $11.2 million due to the
build-out of a new data center, partially offset by maturities
of short-term investments of $22.3 million and the sale of
assets of $0.2 million. The actual cash used in investing
activities was $11.0 million, as the $116.3 million
and $22.3 million of investment activity is a
classification requirement. These investments are available to
us as cash in less than 60 days at any point in time and
there is minimal principal risk.
Net cash used in investing activities of $20.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004 was attributable to
purchases of short- term investments of $24.5 million and
increased capital expenditures due to the implementation of our
new enterprise reporting system and increased capacity for our
data center of $3.7 million, partially offset by the sale
of assets of $6.7 million primarily due to the sale of our
Welcome Wagonfacility and maturities of short-term investments
of $1.0 million. The actual cash provided by investing
activities was $3.0 million, as the $24.5 million and
$1.0 million of investment activity was a classification
requirement.
Net cash provided by financing activities of $95.9 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 was primarily
attributable to $94.1 million in net proceeds from the sale
of convertible preferred stock and $3.6 million due to the
exercise of stock options, partially offset by $1.8 million
in capital lease payments.
Net cash provided by financing activities of $1.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2004 was primarily
attributable to $3.9 million due to the exercise of stock
options, warrants and share purchases under the employee stock
purchase plan, partially offset by $2.1 million in capital
lease payments.
We have generated positive operating cash flows in each of the
last two years. We have stated our intention to invest in our
products, our infrastructure, and in branding
Move.comtm
although we have not determined the actual amount of those
future expenditures. We have no material financial commitments
other than those under capital and
44
operating lease agreements and distribution and marketing
agreements. We believe that our existing cash and short-term
investments, and any cash generated from operations will be
sufficient to fund our working capital requirements, capital
expenditures and other obligations for the foreseeable future.
Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Due in One
|
|
|
Due in One
|
|
|
Due in Three
|
|
|
Over
|
|
|
|
Payments Due
|
|
|
Year or Less
|
|
|
to Three Years
|
|
|
to Five Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
1,021
|
|
|
$
|
1,021
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
20,322
|
|
|
|
6,801
|
|
|
|
7,484
|
|
|
|
1,789
|
|
|
|
4,248
|
|
Obligations under restructuring
charges
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
|
|
3,019
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution agreements
|
|
|
22,675
|
|
|
|
14,975
|
|
|
|
7,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other purchase obligations
|
|
|
7,710
|
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
3,084
|
|
|
|
3,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
55,285
|
|
|
$
|
27,358
|
|
|
$
|
18,806
|
|
|
$
|
4,873
|
|
|
$
|
4,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, we have commitments of approximately
$1.1 million to purchase property, plant and equipment as
of December 31, 2005.
Although our annual net losses have been decreasing and we
anticipate becoming profitable in the future, we recently
announced our new brand Move and certain business model changes
that will require considerable investment with no assurances
that our future financial performance will be enhanced by these
new initiatives. Specifically, in February 2006, we announced
plans to change our corporate name to Move, Inc. and introduced
our new MOVE brand, under which we will promote three consumer
offerings:
REALTOR.com®,
Welcome
Wagon®,
and a new website,
Move.comtm.
We will incur considerable costs in introducing and maintaining
our new brand, which may not produce the same or greater revenue
than we have experienced in the past. In November 2005, we sold
an aggregate of 100,000 shares of our Series B
Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of
$100 million. For so long as the holders of Series B
Preferred Stock hold at least one-sixth of these
100,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, we are
generally not permitted, without obtaining the consent of
holders representing at least a majority of the then outstanding
shares of Series B Preferred Stock, to create or issue any
equity securities that rank senior or on a parity with the
Series B Preferred Stock with respect to dividend rights or
rights upon our liquidation. In addition, our stockholders
agreement with Elevation limits the amount of debt we can incur.
If we need to raise additional capital through public or private
financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements to
execute our business plan, we would be restricted in the type of
equity securities that we could offer and the amount of debt we
can incur without the consent of Elevation. If we were unable to
obtain Elevations consent, we may not be able to raise
additional capital in the amounts needed to fund our business or
for terms that are desirable.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated
entities whereby we have financial guarantees, subordinated
retained interests, derivative instruments or other contingent
arrangements that expose Homestore to material continuing risks,
contingent liabilities, or any other obligation under a variable
interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing,
liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to Homestore.
Recent
Accounting Developments
On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends
SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows.
Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar
to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However,
when implemented, SFAS No. 123(R) requires all
share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee
stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on
their fair values. Pro forma disclosure will no longer be an
alternative. In April 2005, the SEC adopted a new rule which
defers the compliance date of
45
SFAS No. 123(R) until 2006 for calendar year companies
such as the Company. Consistent with the new rule, the Company
intends to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) in the first quarter
of 2006.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.
SFAS No. 154 replaces APB No. 20,
Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3,
Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial
Statements, and establishes retrospective application as
the required method for reporting a change in accounting
principle. SFAS No. 154 provides guidance for
determining whether retrospective application of a change in
accounting principle is impracticable and for reporting a change
when retrospective application is impracticable. The reporting
of a correction of an error by restating previously issued
financial statements is also addressed. SFAS No. 154
is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors
made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The
Company does not anticipate that the adoption of
SFAS No. 154 will have a material effect on the
Companys financial condition, results of operations or
liquidity.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Interest Rate Risk. Our exposure to market
rate risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our
investment portfolio. We have not used derivative financial
instruments in our investment portfolio. We invest our excess
cash in money-market funds, auction rate securities, debt
instruments of high quality corporate issuers and debt
instruments of the U.S. Government and its agencies, and,
by policy, this limits the amount of credit exposure to any one
issuer.
Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest
earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed
rate securities may have their fair market value adversely
impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate
securities may produce less income than expected if interest
rates fall.
46
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Homestore, Inc. Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
47
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Homestore, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Homestore, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2005. Our audits
also included the financial statement schedule listed in the
Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Homestore, Inc. at December 31, 2005
and 2004, and the consolidated results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the
related financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects, the information set
forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of Homestore, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on
criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
and our report dated March 8, 2006 expressed an unqualified
opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 8, 2006
48
HOMESTORE,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
13,272
|
|
|
$
|
14,819
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
139,050
|
|
|
|
45,040
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of
allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,377 and $1,399 at
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively
|
|
|
15,966
|
|
|
|
12,532
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
19,485
|
|
|
|
12,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
187,773
|
|
|
|
84,889
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
20,717
|
|
|
|
15,242
|
|
Goodwill, net
|
|
|
19,502
|
|
|
|
19,502
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
14,264
|
|
|
|
17,864
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
5,026
|
|
|
|
5,840
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,744
|
|
|
|
7,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
249,026
|
|
|
$
|
150,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
6,427
|
|
|
$
|
2,675
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
40,879
|
|
|
|
39,894
|
|
Obligation under capital leases
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
1,774
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
43,652
|
|
|
|
39,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
91,963
|
|
|
|
83,830
|
|
Obligation under capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
3,714
|
|
|
|
4,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
95,753
|
|
|
|
93,111
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
(Note 22)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B convertible
preferred stock
|
|
|
91,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A convertible
preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par
value; 500,000 shares authorized, 149,201 and
146,868 shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,047,456
|
|
|
|
2,043,053
|
|
Deferred stock-based charges
|
|
|
(351
|
)
|
|
|
(406
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,985,673
|
)
|
|
|
(1,985,810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
61,924
|
|
|
|
57,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
249,026
|
|
|
$
|
150,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
49
HOMESTORE,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
|
Revenue (including non-cash equity
charges, see note 2)
|
|
$
|
252,622
|
|
|
$
|
216,860
|
|
|
$
|
198,227
|
|
Related party revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
252,622
|
|
|
|
216,860
|
|
|
|
205,922
|
|
Cost of revenue (including
non-cash equity charges, see note 2)
|
|
|
56,188
|
|
|
|
50,829
|
|
|
|
56,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
196,434
|
|
|
|
166,031
|
|
|
|
149,353
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing (including
non-cash equity charges, see note 2)
|
|
|
91,071
|
|
|
|
88,388
|
|
|
|
101,122
|
|
Product and web site development
(including non-cash equity charges, see note 2)
|
|
|
22,059
|
|
|
|
15,362
|
|
|
|
17,065
|
|
General and administrative
(including non-cash equity charges, see note 2)
|
|
|
82,545
|
|
|
|
68,442
|
|
|
|
65,333
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
7,894
|
|
|
|
21,863
|
|
Restructuring charges (including
non-cash equity charges, see note 2)
|
|
|
(1,331
|
)
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,999
|
|
Litigation settlement
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
63,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
199,718
|
|
|
|
183,570
|
|
|
|
300,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(3,284
|
)
|
|
|
(17,539
|
)
|
|
|
(150,729
|
)
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
(406
|
)
|
Gain on settlement of distribution
agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,071
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
2,366
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
(14,501
|
)
|
|
|
(46,373
|
)
|
Gain on disposition of
discontinued operations
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
7,294
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(679
|
)
|
|
|
(3,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
(7,886
|
)
|
|
|
(47,124
|
)
|
Convertible preferred stock
dividend
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
(7,886
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share
applicable to common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share
applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share
applicable to common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share
applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in calculation of
income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
147,175
|
|
|
|
136,518
|
|
|
|
118,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
182,548
|
|
|
|
136,518
|
|
|
|
118,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
50
HOMESTORE,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
Stock-based
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Income (loss)
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
117,839
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
1,990,755
|
|
|
$
|
(18,567
|
)
|
|
$
|
(106
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,246
|
)
|
|
$
|
(424
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,930,800
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,730
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,124
|
)
|
|
|
(47,124
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on marketable
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
(47,124
|
)
|
|
|
(46,433
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock purchase plan and exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,838
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,302
|
|
Settlement of stock issuance
obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment from stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Repurchase and retirement of
treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,416
|
)
|
|
|
4,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,912
|
|
Shares returned from escrow
relating to discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
120,871
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
1,992,591
|
|
|
$
|
(14,470
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(258
|
)
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
|
$
|
(1,977,924
|
)
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,886
|
)
|
|
|
(7,886
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on marketable
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
(7,886
|
)
|
|
|
(7,744
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock purchase plan and exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,146
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,866
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Retirement of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(14,469
|
)
|
|
|
14,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
Shares issued in settlement of
litigation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,703
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
60,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
146,868
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
2,043,053
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(406
|
)
|
|
$
|
409
|
|
|
$
|
(1,985,810
|
)
|
|
$
|
57,393
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
Unrealized gain on marketable
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under
exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,619
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
Convertible preferred stock
dividend and accretion of discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
Shares issued in settlement of
contractual obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
149,201
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
2,047,456
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(351
|
)
|
|
$
|
343
|
|
|
$
|
(1,985,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
61,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
HOMESTORE,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from continuing
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(310
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,501
|
)
|
|
$
|
(46,373
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash provided by (used in) continuing operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
7,901
|
|
|
|
11,267
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
7,894
|
|
|
|
21,863
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,999
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
Stock-based charges
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
7,249
|
|
Gain on settlement of distribution
agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104,071
|
)
|
Gain on sales of property and
equipment
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(2,226
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Realized loss on sale of
marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
Other non-cash items
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
588
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities, net of acquisitions and discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(4,165
|
)
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
3,716
|
|
Prepaid distribution expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,509
|
|
|
|
22,812
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,068
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
|
|
(680
|
)
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
37,971
|
|
Accrued distribution agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,406
|
)
|
|
|
(22,162
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
5,475
|
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
Deferred revenue from related
parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,657
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
continuing operating activities
|
|
|
6,623
|
|
|
|
9,619
|
|
|
|
(41,113
|
)
|
Net cash provided by discontinued
operations
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
9,915
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
|
|
7,478
|
|
|
|
19,534
|
|
|
|
(40,692
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(11,154
|
)
|
|
|
(3,716
|
)
|
|
|
(8,937
|
)
|
Purchases of short-term investments
|
|
|
(116,285
|
)
|
|
|
(24,465
|
)
|
|
|
(21,575
|
)
|
Maturities of short-term
investments
|
|
|
22,275
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of marketable
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property
and equipment
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
6,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(104,961
|
)
|
|
|
(20,444
|
)
|
|
|
(29,192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from payment of
stockholders notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options, warrants and share issuances under employee stock
purchase plan
|
|
|
3,619
|
|
|
|
3,866
|
|
|
|
3,302
|
|
Payments on capital lease
obligations
|
|
|
(1,760
|
)
|
|
|
(2,079
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of convertible
preferred stock
|
|
|
94,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
95,936
|
|
|
|
1,787
|
|
|
|
3,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,547
|
)
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
(66,521
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period
|
|
|
14,819
|
|
|
|
13,942
|
|
|
|
80,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of
period
|
|
$
|
13,272
|
|
|
$
|
14,819
|
|
|
$
|
13,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
52
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Homestore, Inc. (Homestore or the
Company) has created an online service that enables
consumers to find real estate listings and other content related
to residential real estate, moving and relocation. The
Companys web sites collectively have become the leading
consumer destination on the Internet for home and real
estate-related information based on the number of visitors, time
spent on its web sites and number of property listings. The
Company generates most of its revenue from selling advertising
and marketing solutions to both real estate industry
participants, including real estate agents, homebuilders and
rental property owners, and other local and national advertisers
interested in reaching the Companys consumer audience
before, during or after a move. The Company also provides
software solutions to real estate agents to assist them in
managing their client interactions and architects home
plans to consumers considering building a new home. The Company
derives all of its revenue from its North American operations.
The Companys primary consumer websites include
REALTOR.com®,
the official site of NAR;
HomeBuilder.com®,
the official new home listing site of NAHB;
RENTNET®,
an apartment, corporate housing and self-storage resource;
SeniorHousingNettm.com,
a comprehensive resource for seniors; and
Homestore.com®,
a home information resource site with an emphasis on content
related to mortgage financing, moving and storage, and home and
garden activities. During the second quarter of 2006, the
Company intends to launch
Move.comtm
as a real estate listing and move-related search site. Shortly
after its launch,
Move.comtm
will replace
HomeBuilder.com®,
RENTNET®
and
Homestore.com®
and the Company will begin promoting those under the MOVE brand.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of
Presentation The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the parent company and its
subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All material
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Use of Estimates The preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, disclosure of contingent liabilities and the
reported amounts of revenue and expenses. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Short-Term
Investments All highly liquid instruments
with an original maturity of three months or less are considered
cash and cash equivalents, those with original maturities
greater than three months and current maturities less than
twelve months from the balance sheet date are considered
short-term investments. The Company also invests in certain
auction rate preferred equity and debt securities that have been
classified as short-term investments in the accompanying balance
sheets. The short-term investments are presented in current
assets in the accompanying balance sheets, as they are intended
to meet the short-term working capital needs of the Company. The
Company does not invest in any long-term investments. It invests
its excess cash in money-market funds, debt instruments of high
quality corporate issuers and debt instruments of the
U.S. Government and its agencies, and, by policy, this
limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer.
The Companys marketable securities and short-term
investments are classified as
available-for-sale
and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and
losses, net of tax, recorded in the comprehensive income (loss)
component of stockholders equity. Realized gains or losses
and declines in value that are other than temporary, if any, on
available-for-sale
securities are calculated using the specific identification
method and are reported in other income or expense as incurred.
For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
realized gains and losses were insignificant.
Concentration of Credit Risk Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to a
concentration of credit risk consist of cash and cash
equivalents, short and long term investments, marketable equity
securities and accounts and notes receivable. The Companys
accounts receivable are derived primarily from revenue earned
from
53
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
customers located in the United States. The Company maintains an
allowance for doubtful accounts based upon the expected
collectibility of accounts and notes receivable.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, revenue from
related party arrangements with Cendant Corporation and Real
Estate Technology Trust (RETT) accounted for
approximately 4% of the Companys revenue (See
Note 11). No other customer accounted for more than 10% of
the Companys revenue in any year. As of December 31,
2005 and 2004, no customer represented more than 5% of net
accounts receivable.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The
Companys financial instruments, including cash and cash
equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable,
and notes payable are carried at cost, which approximates their
fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments
and the relatively stable interest rate environment.
Prepaid Commissions The Company prepays
commissions to certain of its salespersons on the contract sale
date and expenses the commission consistent with the revenue
recognition term.
Property and Equipment Property and
equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which is
generally three to five years for computer software and
equipment, three to five years for furniture, fixtures and
office equipment, and five to seven years for machinery and
equipment. Amortization of assets recorded under capital leases
is included in depreciation expense and amortized over the life
of the lease. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the
shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful lives. Upon
the sale or retirement of property or equipment, the cost and
related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed
from the Companys financial statements with the resulting
gain or loss reflected in the Companys results of
operations.
Product and Web site Development
Costs Costs incurred by the Company to
develop, enhance, manage, monitor and operate the Companys
web sites are generally expensed as incurred, except for certain
costs relating to the acquisition and development of
internal-use software that are capitalized and depreciated over
estimated economic lives, generally three years or less in
accordance with
SOP 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. The Company had
$2.9 million and $2.6 million of capitalized software
costs and $2.6 million and $2.6 million of accumulated
amortization included in computer software and equipment at
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Identifiable Intangibles, Goodwill and other Long-Lived
Assets Definite lived identifiable
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over
their estimated useful lives, ranging from two to fifteen years.
The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets, which
include property and equipment and identifiable intangible
assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that such assets might be impaired and the carrying value may
not be recoverable. Events and circumstances that may indicate
that an asset is impaired may include significant decreases in
the market value of an asset or common stock, a significant
decline in actual and projected advertising and software license
revenue, loss of key customer relationships or renegotiation of
existing arrangements, a change in the extent or manner in which
an asset is used, shifts in technology, loss of key management
or personnel, changes in the Companys operating model or
strategy and competitive forces as well as other factors.
If events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset may not be recoverable and the expected undiscounted
future cash flows attributable to the asset are less than the
carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss equal to the
excess of the assets carrying value over its fair value is
recorded. Fair value is determined based on the present value of
estimated expected future cash flows using a discount rate
commensurate with the risk involved, quoted market prices or
appraised values, depending on the nature of the assets.
Goodwill has been recorded in connection with the Companys
various acquisitions. In testing for a potential impairment of
goodwill, the Company will first compare the estimated fair
value of each reporting unit with book value, including
goodwill. If the estimated fair value exceeds book value,
goodwill is considered not to be impaired and no additional
steps are necessary. If, however, the fair value of the
respective reporting units of the Company is less than book
54
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
value, then the Company is required to compare the carrying
amount of the goodwill with its implied fair value. The estimate
of implied fair value of goodwill may require independent
valuations of certain internally generated and unrecognized
intangible assets such as its subscriber base, software and
technology and patents and trademarks. If the carrying amount of
the goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an
impairment loss would be recognized in an amount equal to the
excess.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company
recorded an impairment charge of $27.0 million (See
Note 5). There were no impairment charges in the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
The following table summarizes the Companys useful lives
for significant intangible and long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of
|
|
Type
|
|
Lives
|
|
|
Customer, merchant lists and
relationships
|
|
|
2-5
|
|
Exclusive electronic listing and
rights agreement
|
|
|
9
|
|
NAR operating agreement
|
|
|
15
|
|
Online traffic
|
|
|
3
|
|
Porting relationships
|
|
|
5
|
|
Purchased content
|
|
|
5
|
|
Purchased technology
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
Tradename, trademarks, brand name
|
|
|
5-15
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2-15
|
|
Revenue Recognition The Company derives
its revenue primarily from two sources (i) software
revenue, which includes software licenses and support revenue
which includes software maintenance, training, consulting and
web site hosting revenue and (ii) advertising revenue for
running online advertising on the Companys web sites or
offline advertising placed in its publications. As described
below, significant management judgments and estimates must be
made and used in connection with the revenue recognized in any
accounting period.
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Securities and
Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104,
Revenue Recognition, and Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue (EITF) 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables. Revenue is recognized only when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or
determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
The Company assesses collection based on a number of factors,
including past transaction history with the customer and the
credit worthiness of the customer. The Company does not request
collateral from its customers. If the Company determines that
collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, the Company
defers the fee and recognizes revenue at the time collection
becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of
cash. Cash received in advance is recorded as deferred revenue
until earned.
Software Revenue The Company generally
licenses its software products in two ways: (i) on a
one-year term basis; and (ii) on a monthly subscription
basis. The Companys hosting arrangements require customers
to pay a fixed fee and receive service over a period of time,
generally one year.
The Company applies the provisions of Statement of Position
(SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue
Recognition, as amended by
SOP 98-9,
Modification of
SOP 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain
Transactions, to all transactions involving the sale of
software. The Company recognizes license revenue upon all of the
following criteria being satisfied: (i) the execution of a
license agreement; (ii) product delivery; (iii) fees
are fixed or determinable; (iv) collectibility is
reasonably assured; and (v) all other significant
obligations have been fulfilled. For arrangements containing
multiple elements, such as software license fees, consulting
services and maintenance, and where vendor-specific objective
evidence (VSOE) of fair value exists for all
undelivered
55
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
elements, the Company accounts for the delivered elements in
accordance with the residual method prescribed by
SOP 98-9.
For arrangements in which VSOE does not exist for the
undelivered element, including specified upgrades, revenue is
deferred and not recognized until either VSOE is established or
delivery of the element without VSOE has occurred. The
Companys arrangements generally do not include acceptance
clauses. However, if an arrangement includes an acceptance
clause, acceptance occurs upon the earlier of receipt of a
written customer acceptance or expiration of the acceptance
period. Revenue for maintenance services are recognized ratably
over the contract term. Certain software products are sold as
subscriptions, and accordingly, revenue is deferred and
recognized ratably over the term of the contract which is
typically based on a one-year renewable term.
Advertising Revenue The Company sells
online and offline advertising. Online advertising revenue
includes three revenue streams: (i) impression based,
(ii) fixed fee subscriptions and (iii) variable,
performance based agreements. The impressions based agreements
range from spot purchases to 12 month contracts. The
impression based revenue is recognized based upon actual
impressions delivered and viewed by a user in a period. The
fixed fee subscription revenue is recognized ratably over the
period in which the services are provided. The Company measures
performance related to advertising obligations on a monthly
basis prior to the recording of revenue. Offline advertising
revenue is recognized when the publications in which the
advertising is displayed are shipped.
Shipping and Handling Income and
Costs The Company accounts for income and
costs related to shipping and handling activities in accordance
with the EITF Issue
No. 00-10,
Accounting for Shipping and Handling Revenues and
Costs. Income from shipping and handling is included with
revenue. Associated costs of shipping and handling are included
in cost of revenue.
Advertising Expense Advertising costs
are expensed as incurred and totaled $16.5 million,
$22.8 million and $22.9 million during the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Stock-Based Charges The Company accounts
for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in accordance
with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion
(APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees, and complies with the disclosure provisions
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. Under APB No. 25,
compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period based
on the difference, if any, on the date of grant between the
deemed fair value for accounting purposes of the Companys
stock and the exercise price on the date of grant.
The Company follows the intrinsic value method in accounting for
its stock options. Had compensation cost been recognized based
on the fair value at the date of grant for options granted in
2005, 2004 and 2003, the pro forma amounts of the Companys
net loss and net loss per share for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 would have been as follows
(in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to
common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
(7,886
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,124
|
)
|
Add: Stock-based employee
compensation charges included in reported net loss
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
3,069
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based
compensation determined under the fair value-based method for
all awards
|
|
|
(17,429
|
)
|
|
|
(15,747
|
)
|
|
|
(20,067
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$
|
(16,645
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,333
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64,122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per
share basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value for each option granted was estimated at the date
of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, assuming
the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Expected lives (in years)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
124
|
%
|
|
|
130
|
%
|
|
|
144
|
%
|
The Company accounts for stock issued to non-employees in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 and
EITF 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That
Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in
Conjunction with Selling, Goods and Services. In November
2001, the EITF reached a consensus in
EITF 00-18,
Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving
Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees, that
an asset acquired in exchange for the issuance of fully vested,
nonforfeitable equity instruments should not be displayed as
contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments.
The following chart summarizes the stock-based charges that have
been included in the following captions for each of the periods
presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
Product and web site development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,115
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
$
|
7,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based charges for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003 include $0.3 million, $0.3 million and
$2.3 million, respectively, related to vendor agreements
with the remainder related to employee-based stock option
charges.
Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted
for under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. Under SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets
and liabilities are determined based on differences between the
financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities, and
are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be
in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.
Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce
deferred taxes to the amount expected to be realized.
Net Income (Loss) Per Share Net income
(loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss)
applicable to common stockholders for the period by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding. Shares associated
with stock options, warrants and convertible preferred stock are
not included to the extent they are anti-dilutive.
Foreign Currency Translation The
financial statements of the Companys foreign subsidiaries
are measured using the local currency as the functional
currency. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are
translated at the rate of exchange at the balance sheet date.
Income and expense items are translated at average monthly rates
of exchange prevailing during the year. The resulting
translation adjustments are included in accumulated other
comprehensive income as a separate component of
stockholders equity.
57
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Comprehensive Income Comprehensive
income is defined as the change in equity of a business
enterprise during a period from transactions and other events
and circumstances from non-owner sources. For the Company,
comprehensive income consists of its reported net income or
loss, the change in the foreign currency translation adjustments
during a period and the net unrealized gains or losses on
short-term investments and marketable equity securities.
Segments The Company reports segment
information in accordance with SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information. This standard is based on a management
approach, which requires segmentation based upon the
Companys internal organization and disclosure of revenue
and operating expenses based upon internal accounting methods.
During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company revised its
business segments to align with the way it is approaching the
market: Real Estate Services for those products and services
offered to industry professionals trying to reach new movers and
Move-Related Services for those products and services offered to
other advertisers who are trying to reach those consumers in the
process of a move.
Recent Accounting Developments On
December 16, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a
revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123(R)
supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and amends SFAS No. 95,
Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in
SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described
in SFAS No. 123. However, when implemented,
SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be
recognized in the income statement based on their fair values.
Pro forma disclosure will no longer be an alternative. In April
2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
adopted a new rule which defers the compliance date of
SFAS No. 123(R) until 2006 for calendar year companies
such as the Company. Consistent with the new rule, the Company
intends to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) in the first quarter
of 2006.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.
SFAS No. 154 replaces APB No. 20,
Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3,
Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial
Statements, and establishes retrospective application as
the required method for reporting a change in accounting
principle. SFAS No. 154 provides guidance for
determining whether retrospective application of a change in
accounting principle is impracticable and for reporting a change
when retrospective application is impracticable. The reporting
of a correction of an error by restating previously issued
financial statements is also addressed. SFAS No. 154
is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors
made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The
Company does not anticipate that the adoption of
SFAS No. 154 will have a material effect on the
Companys financial condition, the results of operations or
liquidity.
Reclassifications Certain
reclassifications have been made to prior years financial
statements in order to conform to the 2005 presentations.
|
|
3.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
On October 6, 2004, the Company entered into an Asset
Purchase Agreement with Wyld Acquisition Corp.
(Wyld), a wholly owned subsidiary of Siegel
Enterprises, Inc., pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell
its Wyldfyre software business, which at the time had been
reported as part of the Companys software segment for a
purchase price of $8.5 million in cash. The transaction
closed on October 6, 2004, resulting in a gain on
disposition of discontinued operations of $5.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004. The sale generated net
proceeds of approximately $7.0 million after transaction
fees and monies placed in escrow pursuant to the Asset Purchase
Agreement. The entire amount in the escrow was released and an
additional gain on disposition of discontinued operations of
$855,000 was recognized for the year ended December 31,
2005.
On December 21, 2004, the Company entered into an Asset
Purchase Agreement with Newstar Systems, Inc.
(Newstar) pursuant to which the Company agreed to
sell its Computer for Tracts (CFT) software
business,
58
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
which at the time had been reported as part of the
Companys software segment for a purchase price of
approximately $2.5 million in cash. The transaction closed
on December 21, 2004, resulting in a gain on disposition of
discontinued operations of approximately $1.6 million.
On March 19, 2002, we entered into an agreement to sell our
ConsumerInfo division, a former subsidiary of iPlace, to
Experian Holdings, Inc. (Experian), for
$130.0 million in cash. The transaction closed on
April 2, 2002. As part of the sale to Experian,
$10.0 million of the purchase price was put in escrow to
secure our indemnification obligations (the Indemnity
Escrow). In the second quarter of 2003, $2.3 million
was released to us from the Indemnity Escrow and recognized as
Gain on disposition of discontinued operations. As
of December 31, 2005, cash in the Indemnity Escrow was
$7.5 million. To the extent the Indemnity Escrow is
released to us, we will recognize additional gain on disposition
of discontinued operations.
The Indemnity Escrow was scheduled to terminate in the third
quarter of 2003, but prior to the scheduled termination,
Experian demanded indemnification from us for claims made
against Experian or its subsidiaries by several parties. (See
Note 22.)
Pursuant to SFAS No. 144, the consolidated financial
statements of the Company for all periods presented reflect the
disposition of its Wyldfyre, CFT, and ConsumerInfo divisions as
discontinued operations. Accordingly, the revenue, costs and
expenses, and cash flows of these divisions have been excluded
from the respective captions in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and have
been reported as Loss from discontinued operations,
net of applicable income taxes of zero; and as Net cash
provided by (used in) discontinued operations. Total
revenue and loss from discontinued operations are reflected
below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
9,137
|
|
|
$
|
12,788
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
9,816
|
|
|
|
16,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(679
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The calculation of the gain on the sale of discontinued
operations is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Gross proceeds from sale
|
|
$
|
855
|
|
|
$
|
10,981
|
|
|
$
|
2,300
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash subject to escrow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Homestore stock received
from purchase of iPlace
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of
discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
855
|
|
|
$
|
7,294
|
|
|
$
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cash and stock received in the year ended December 31,
2003 from the purchase of iPlace relates to the settlement of
the original escrow related to the Companys purchase of
iPlace in 2001.
In the fourth quarter of 2001, the Companys Board of
Directors approved a restructuring and integration plan, with
the objective of eliminating duplicate resources and
redundancies and implementing a new management structure to more
efficiently serve the Companys customers. The plan
included the unwinding of the Companys
59
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
newly formed or recently acquired international operations and a
broad restructuring of the Companys core operations.
As part of this restructuring and integration plan, the Company
under recorded a review of its existing locations and elected to
close a number of satellite offices and identified and notified
approximately 700 employees whose positions with the Company
were eliminated. The work force reductions affected
approximately 150 members of management, 100 in research and
development, 200 in sales and marketing and 250 in
administrative functions.
In connection with this restructuring and integration plan, the
Company recorded a charge of $35.8 million in the fourth
quarter of 2001, which was included in restructuring charges on
the Consolidated Statement of Operations. This charge consists
of the following: (i) employee termination benefits of
$6.4 million; (ii) facility closure charges of
$20.8 million, comprised of $12.8 million in future
lease obligations, exit costs and cancellation penalties, net of
estimated sublease income of $11.9 million, and
$8.0 million of non-cash fixed asset disposals related to
vacating duplicate facilities and decreased equipment
requirements due to lower headcount; (iii) non-cash
write-offs of $2.9 million in other assets related to
exited activities; and (iv) accrued future payments of
$5.7 million for existing contractual obligations with no
future benefits to the Company. During the year ended
December 31, 2002, the Company revised its estimates
relating to a lease obligation and recorded an additional
$6.5 million charge. The Company also reduced its estimates
for employee termination pay by $396,000 and its contractual
obligations by $798,000 in 2002. The Companys original
estimate with respect to sublease income related primarily to a
lease commitment for office space in San Francisco that
expires in November 2006. The Company originally estimated that
it would sublease the facility by the second quarter of 2003 at
a rate of approximately two-thirds of the existing commitment.
However, declines in the demand for office space in the
San Francisco market have led the Company to revise these
estimates on three other occasions. In the fourth quarter of
2003, the Company recorded an additional charge of
$1.3 million. During the year ended December 31, 2004
the Company recorded an additional charge of approximately
$1.0 million because the Company was uncertain it would be
able to sublease the remaining one-third of the
San Francisco property. During the year ended
December 31, 2005, the Company negotiated a reduction to
its lease obligation for the San Francisco property. That
revision along with fluctuations in the exchange rate for some
of the contractual obligations related to the foreign operations
resulted in a $1.3 million reduction in the restructuring
charges. A summary of activity related to the fourth quarter
2001 restructuring charge is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Initial restructuring charge
|
|
$
|
6,364
|
|
|
$
|
12,782
|
|
|
$
|
10,917
|
|
|
$
|
5,733
|
|
|
$
|
35,796
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(3,511
|
)
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(3,789
|
)
|
Non-cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,917
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,917
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2001
|
|
|
2,853
|
|
|
|
12,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,592
|
|
|
|
21,090
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(2,274
|
)
|
|
|
(5,480
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,631
|
)
|
|
|
(11,385
|
)
|
Change in estimates
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
6,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(798
|
)
|
|
|
4,833
|
|
Non-cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
Sale of a subsidiary
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
13,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
14,870
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(4,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(576
|
)
|
|
|
(5,552
|
)
|
Change in estimates
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
1,077
|
|
Non-cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of a subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
10,395
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(3,966
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(3,982
|
)
|
Change in estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
7,428
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,260
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(3,268
|
)
|
Change in estimates
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(1,172
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(1,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,589
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
$
|
2,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substantially all of the remaining restructuring liabilities at
December 31, 2005 will be paid during 2006. Any further
changes to the accruals based upon current estimates will be
reflected through the acquisition and restructuring charges line
in the consolidated statement of operations.
In the first quarter of 2002, the Companys Board of
Directors approved an additional restructuring and integration
plan, with the objective of eliminating duplicate resources and
redundancies.
As part of this restructuring and integration plan, the Company
undertook a review of its existing locations and elected to
close offices and identified and notified approximately 270
employees whose positions with the Company were eliminated. The
work force reductions affected approximately 30 members of
management, 40 in research and development, 140 in sales and
marketing and 60 in administrative functions.
In connection with this restructuring and integration plan, the
Company recorded a charge of $2.3 million in the first
quarter of 2002, which was included in restructuring charges in
the consolidated statement of operations. This charge consists
of the employee termination benefits of $1.7 million and
facility closure charges of approximately $600,000. In the third
quarter of 2002, the Company evaluated its original estimates
and concluded it must increase its charge for lease obligations
by $1.6 million because of a decline in market rates and
reduce its estimate for employee termination pay by $242,000. In
the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company reduced its estimate for
employee termination by $14,000 and increased its charge for
lease obligations and related charges by $46,000 as a result of
changes in exchange rates. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, the Company increased its charge for
lease obligations and related charges by $372,000 as a result of
changes in exchange rates. During the year ended
December 31, 2005, the Company increased its charge for
lease obligation and related charges by $29,000 as a result of
changes in exchange rates.
61
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of activity related to the first quarter 2002
restructuring charge is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Initial restructuring charge
|
|
$
|
1,720
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
260
|
|
|
$
|
2,289
|
|
Non-cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(1,452
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,639
|
)
|
Change in estimates
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
1,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
Change in estimates
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(386
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(386
|
)
|
Change in estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(414
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(414
|
)
|
Change in estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the remaining restructuring liabilities at
December 31, 2005 are related to lease obligations and will
be paid through 2008. Any further changes to the accruals based
upon current estimates will be reflected through restructuring
charges in the consolidated statement of operations.
In the third quarter of 2002, the Companys Board of
Directors approved a further restructuring and integration plan,
with the objective of eliminating duplicate resources and
redundancies. As part of this restructuring and integration
plan, the Company undertook a review of its existing locations
and elected to close an office and identified and notified
approximately 190 employees whose positions with the Company
were eliminated. The work force reductions affected
approximately 30 in research and development, 10 in production,
140 in sales and marketing and 10 in administrative functions.
In connection with this restructuring and integration plan, the
Company recorded a charge of $3.6 million in the third
quarter of 2002, which was included in restructuring charges in
the consolidated statement of operations. This charge consists
of employee termination benefits of $1.6 million and
facility closure charges of approximately $2.0 million. In
the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company reduced its estimate for
employee termination by $132,000 and reduced its lease
obligations and related charges by $417,000 as a result of a
buy-out of the remaining lease obligation. During the year ended
December 31, 2005, the Company reduced its lease
obligations and related charges by $20,000 as a result of a
buy-out of the remaining lease obligation having satisfied all
of its obligations under this restructuring plan.
62
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of activity related to the third quarter 2002
restructuring charge is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Initial restructuring charge
|
|
$
|
1,590
|
|
|
$
|
2,033
|
|
|
$
|
3,623
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(1,190
|
)
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
(1,443
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
2,180
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(1,119
|
)
|
|
|
(1,387
|
)
|
Change in estimates
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
(549
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
Change in estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Change in estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Companys Board of
Directors approved a further restructuring and integration plan,
with the objective of eliminating duplicate resources and
redundancies. As part of this restructuring and integration
plan, the Company undertook a review of its existing operations
and elected to change its management structure and identified
and notified approximately 95 employees whose positions with the
Company were eliminated. The work force reductions affected
approximately 7 in research and development, 17 in production,
37 in sales and marketing and 34 in administrative functions. As
of December 31, 2003, all of the planned 95 employees have
been terminated and a total of 17 have not yet been paid
severance.
In connection with this restructuring and integration plan, the
Company recorded a charge of $3.5 million in the fourth
quarter of 2003, which was included in the acquisition and
restructuring charges line in the consolidated statement of
operations. This charge consists of employee termination
benefits of $1.4 million and stock-based charges related
the acceleration of vesting of certain options for terminated
management personnel of approximately $2.1 million. In the
first quarter of 2004, the Company reduced its estimate for
employee termination benefits by $71,000. During the year ended
December 31, 2005, the Company reduced its estimate for
employee termination benefits by $15,000 having satisfied all of
its obligations under this restructuring plan.
63
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of activity related to the fourth quarter 2003
restructuring charge is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
Charges For
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Vesting
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Initial restructuring charge
|
|
$
|
1,401
|
|
|
$
|
2,140
|
|
|
$
|
3,541
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
Non-cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,140
|
)
|
|
|
(2,140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(804
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(804
|
)
|
Change in estimates
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in estimates
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at
December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
|
In the third quarter of 2003, specific events and changes in
operations of the business indicated a potential impairment of
its long-lived assets. The specific events and changes in
circumstances indicating a potential impairment included certain
business units continuing to perform below managements
expectations. Pursuant to SFAS Nos. 144 and 142, the
Company performed an impairment analysis. Fair value was
determined based on the present value of estimated expected
future cash flows using discount rates ranging from 11% to 20%.
The Companys impairment analysis resulted in a charge of
$13.0 million in the third quarter of 2003 comprised of
impairments of $11.7 million of identifiable intangible
assets relating to the Companys acquisitions of
SpringStreet and Move.com, Inc. and $1.3 million of prepaid
distribution expense.
In the third quarter of 2003, in conjunction with the settlement
of the dispute with Cendant Corporation and certain of its
affiliates (collectively Cendant), the Company
relinquished certain exclusive data rights and rights under
other agreements that were entered into at the time of the
acquisition of Move.com, Inc. and Welcome
Wagon®
International, Inc. (collectively the Move.com
Group). As a result of the surrender of those rights,
certain intangible assets associated with those rights no longer
have value to the Company, and, accordingly, the Company
recorded an impairment charge of $12.2 million in the year
ended December 31, 2003.
In the fourth quarter of 2003, pursuant to
SFAS No. 142, the Company performed its annual review
of the valuation of its goodwill with the assistance of outside
valuation specialists, fair value was determined based on the
present value of estimated expected future cash flows using
discount rates from 14% to 18%. The Companys impairment
analysis did not result in a charge. However, specific events
and changes in circumstances indicated a potential impairment.
Those specific events included the Company revising its
implementation plan of its enterprise resource planning system.
As a result of the revision, the decision was made to terminate
the implementation of one aspect of the application. This
decision resulted in a charge of $1.8 million.
Based on the Companys annual analysis, there were no
impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2004.
64
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Short-term
Investments
|
The following table summarizes the Companys investments in
available-for-sale
securities classified as short-term investments and marketable
equity securities at December 31, 2005 and 2004 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate preferred instruments
|
|
$
|
139,050
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
139,050
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate preferred instruments
|
|
$
|
45,040
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,040
|
|
The contractual maturities of
available-for-sale
debt securities at December 31, 2005 and 2004 were less
than 60 days.
|
|
7.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Computer software and equipment
|
|
$
|
48,026
|
|
|
$
|
37,415
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and office
equipment
|
|
|
4,264
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
6,658
|
|
|
|
6,352
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,874
|
|
|
|
48,444
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(40,157
|
)
|
|
|
(33,202
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,717
|
|
|
$
|
15,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense, excluding discontinued operations, for the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was
$7.5 million, $7.9 million and $11.3 million,
respectively. Computer software and equipment above includes
$5.5 million of assets purchased under capital leases at
December 31, 2005 and 2004. Amortization expense associated
with assets purchased under capital leases for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $1.3 million,
$926,000, and $64,000, respectively.
|
|
8.
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill by segment as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Real Estate Services
|
|
$
|
12,988
|
|
|
$
|
12,988
|
|
Move-Related Services
|
|
|
6,514
|
|
|
|
6,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
19,502
|
|
|
$
|
19,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Definite-lived intangible assets consist of purchased content,
porting relationships, purchased technology, and other
miscellaneous agreements entered into in connection with
business combinations and are amortized over
65
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
expected periods of benefits. There are no indefinite lived
intangibles and no expected residual values related to these
intangible assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Customer lists and relationships
|
|
$
|
786
|
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
|
$
|
18,786
|
|
|
$
|
18,407
|
|
Trade name, trademarks, web sites
and brand names
|
|
|
19,746
|
|
|
|
6,902
|
|
|
|
19,746
|
|
|
|
5,499
|
|
Purchased technology
|
|
|
9,099
|
|
|
|
9,099
|
|
|
|
9,325
|
|
|
|
8,642
|
|
Purchased content
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,631
|
|
|
|
7,631
|
|
Porting relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
NAR®
operating agreement
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,515
|
|
|
|
5,126
|
|
|
|
6,377
|
|
|
|
4,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
36,724
|
|
|
$
|
22,460
|
|
|
$
|
65,171
|
|
|
$
|
47,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense, excluding discontinued operations, for
intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003 was $3.6 million, $7.9 million and
$21.9 million, respectively. Amortization expense for the
next five years is estimated to be as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
1,858
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,417
|
|
Other current assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Prepaid commissions
|
|
$
|
7,139
|
|
|
$
|
6,226
|
|
Cash surrender value of life
insurance policies
|
|
|
5,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,128
|
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,485
|
|
|
$
|
12,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accrued expenses, current, consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and related
benefits
|
|
$
|
16,060
|
|
|
$
|
14,109
|
|
Accrued restructuring charges
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
4,656
|
|
Accrued legal and professional fees
|
|
|
9,140
|
|
|
|
9,588
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12,415
|
|
|
|
11,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,879
|
|
|
$
|
39,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Related-party
Transactions
|
In February 2001, the Company acquired all of the outstanding
shares of the Move.com Group from Cendant valued at
$745.7 million. In connection with and contingent upon the
closing of the acquisition of the Move.com Group, the Company
entered into a series of commercial agreements for the sale of
various technology and subscription-based products to Real
Estate Technology Trust (RETT), an independent trust
established in 1996 to provide technology services and products
to Cendants real estate franchisees that was considered a
related party of the Company. Revenue of $7.7 million
related to these transactions was recognized in 2003. This
revenue was reported separately as revenue from related parties
in these financial statements. It is not practical to separately
determine the costs of such revenues. During the year ended
December 31, 2003, the Company had received approximately
$1.2 million of cash related to these agreements. Cendant
ceased being a related party in early 2004.
As part of an employment agreement entered into in 2002, the
Company reimburses its chief executive officer for the business
use of an airplane, which is owned indirectly by him. Total
expense incurred by the Company for reimbursement was
approximately $1.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and $1.3 million for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Segment information is presented in accordance with
SFAS No. 131 Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. This standard is based
on a management approach, which requires segmentation based upon
the Companys internal organization and disclosure of
revenue and operating expenses based upon internal accounting
methods. During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company revised
its business segments to align with the way it is approaching
the market: Real Estate Services for those products and services
offered to industry professionals trying to reach new movers and
manage their relationships with them and Move-Related Services
for those products and services offered to other advertisers who
are trying to reach those consumers in the process of a move. As
a result of these changes, we evaluate performance and allocate
resources based on these two segments. We have reclassified
previously reported segment data to conform to the current
period presentation. This is consistent with the data that is
made available to our management to assess performance and make
decisions.
The expenses presented below for each of the business segments
include an allocation of certain corporate expenses that are
identifiable and benefit those segments and are allocated for
internal management reporting purposes. The unallocated expenses
are those corporate overhead expenses that are not directly
attributable to a segment and include: corporate expenses, such
as finance, legal, internal business systems, and human
resources; amortization of intangible assets; litigation
settlement charges; stock-based charges; impairment charges and
acquisition and restructuring charges. There is no inter-segment
revenue. Assets and liabilities are not fully allocated to
segments for internal reporting purposes.
67
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Summarized information, by segment, as excerpted from the
internal management reports is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Move-Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
181,324
|
|
|
$
|
71,298
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
252,622
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
27,902
|
|
|
|
26,346
|
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
56,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
153,422
|
|
|
|
44,952
|
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
196,434
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
60,125
|
|
|
|
29,644
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
91,071
|
|
Product and web site development
|
|
|
15,922
|
|
|
|
3,755
|
|
|
|
2,382
|
|
|
|
22,059
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
22,750
|
|
|
|
12,832
|
|
|
|
46,963
|
|
|
|
82,545
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
Litigation settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,331
|
)
|
|
|
(1,331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
98,797
|
|
|
|
46,231
|
|
|
|
54,690
|
|
|
|
199,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
54,625
|
|
|
$
|
(1,279
|
)
|
|
$
|
(56,630
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,284
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Move-Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
148,359
|
|
|
$
|
68,501
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
216,860
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
28,213
|
|
|
|
21,784
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
50,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
120,146
|
|
|
|
46,717
|
|
|
|
(832
|
)
|
|
|
166,031
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
59,039
|
|
|
|
28,637
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
88,388
|
|
Product and web site development
|
|
|
13,425
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
15,362
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
21,033
|
|
|
|
12,373
|
|
|
|
35,036
|
|
|
|
68,442
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,894
|
|
|
|
7,894
|
|
Litigation settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
93,497
|
|
|
|
42,946
|
|
|
|
47,127
|
|
|
|
183,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
26,649
|
|
|
$
|
3,771
|
|
|
$
|
(47,959
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,539
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Move-Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
142,183
|
|
|
$
|
63,739
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
205,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
33,779
|
|
|
|
21,381
|
|
|
|
1,409
|
|
|
|
56,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
108,404
|
|
|
|
42,358
|
|
|
|
(1,409
|
)
|
|
|
149,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
65,547
|
|
|
|
29,606
|
|
|
|
5,969
|
|
|
|
101,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and web site development
|
|
|
15,115
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
17,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
21,854
|
|
|
|
12,767
|
|
|
|
30,712
|
|
|
|
65,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,863
|
|
|
|
21,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,600
|
|
|
|
63,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,999
|
|
|
|
26,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
102,516
|
|
|
|
44,302
|
|
|
|
153,264
|
|
|
|
300,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
5,888
|
|
|
$
|
(1,944
|
)
|
|
$
|
(154,673
|
)
|
|
$
|
(150,729
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003 included
$7.7 million of revenue from a related party, Cendant and
RETT (Cendant) in our Real Estate Services segment. Our revenue
from Cendant was less than 10% in each segment for the year
ended December 31, 2003 and Cendant ceased to be a related
party during 2004.
Our
REALTOR.com®
listing enhancement product within the Real Estate Services
segment represented 22%, 19% and 18% of our total revenue for
fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. Our
RENTNET®
online brochure product within the Real Estate Services segment
represented 10%, 12% and 14% of our total revenue for fiscal
years 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Welcome
Wagon®
gift book within the Move-Related Services segment represented
12%, 14% and 15% of our total revenue for fiscal years 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively.
Option
Plans
In general, options granted by the Company are vested over a
four year period and are granted at fair market value at the
date of grant. The life of an option grant cannot exceed ten
years. In January 1999, the Board of Directors adopted, and in
March 1999 the Companys stockholders approved, the 1999
Equity Incentive Plan (1999 Plan) to replace a
pre-existing stock option plan (1996 Plan). The 1999
Plan provides for the issuance of both non-statutory and
incentive stock options to employees, officers, directors and
consultants of the Company. The initial number of shares of
common stock reserved for issuance under the 1999 Plan was
10,000,000. In April 1999 and June 1999, the Board of Directors
authorized, and the stockholders approved, an increase in the
number of shares reserved for issuance under the 1999 Plan by an
additional 3,000,000 shares and 625,000 shares,
respectively.
In June 1999, the Board of Directors adopted, and the
stockholders approved, the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan
(SIP). The SIP reserves 4,900,000 shares of
common stock for future grants. The SIP contains a provision for
an automatic increase in the number of shares available for
grant starting January 1, 2000 and each January thereafter
by an amount equal to 4.5% of the outstanding shares as of the
preceding December 31; provided, however, that the
aggregate number of shares that qualify as Incentive Stock
Options (as defined in the plan) must not exceed
20.0 million shares. In accordance with the provisions of
the SIP, the number of options available for grant was increased
by 6,713,966, 6,608,957 and 5,439,240 shares in January
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Pursuant to the terms of the
plan, no person is eligible to receive more than 2 million
shares in any calendar year under the plan.
In connection with acquisitions prior to 2002, the Company
assumed options of 5,400,000. Options outstanding as of
December 31, 2005 pursuant to compensation plans assumed in
connection with prior acquisitions were 180,249 and the weighted
average exercise price of those option shares is $20.30.
69
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On January 15, 2002, the Board of Directors adopted the
2002 Stock Incentive Plan (2002 SIP). The 2002 SIP
reserved 15,000,000 shares of common stock for future
grants of nonqualified stock options to employees, consultants,
contractors and advisors as to be determined by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors. Pursuant to the terms of
the plan, options granted to insiders (officers or directors of
the Company who are subject to Section 16 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934) may not exceed in the aggregate forty
percent (40%) of all shares that are reserved for grant under
the plan.
The following table summarizes the activities under the option
plans for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price per Share
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2002
|
|
|
24,315
|
|
|
$
|
0.30 to 89.25
|
|
|
$
|
3.32
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
0.56 to 3.68
|
|
|
|
1.84
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,595
|
)
|
|
|
0.30 to 3.57
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(2,735
|
)
|
|
|
0.30 to 89.25
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2003
|
|
|
22,549
|
|
|
|
0.30 to 89.25
|
|
|
|
2.87
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
8,459
|
|
|
|
2.18 to 4.88
|
|
|
|
3.37
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,739
|
)
|
|
|
0.30 to 3.00
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(1,356
|
)
|
|
|
0.30 to 89.25
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2004
|
|
|
27,913
|
|
|
|
0.30 to 89.25
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
7,031
|
|
|
|
1.95 to 5.10
|
|
|
|
2.31
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,962
|
)
|
|
|
0.30 to 4.80
|
|
|
|
1.84
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(767
|
)
|
|
|
0.30 to 69.63
|
|
|
|
5.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
32,215
|
|
|
$
|
0.30 to 89.25
|
|
|
$
|
2.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock available for future grants as of December 31,
2005 was 14.0 million shares, but increased on
January 1, 2006 to 20.7 million shares.
Additional information with respect to the outstanding options
at December 31, 2005 is as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Prices
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
$0.30 to 1.34
|
|
|
3,226
|
|
|
|
6.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
2,542
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
1.43 to 1.72
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
6.63
|
|
|
|
1.46
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
1.76
|
|
|
10,820
|
|
|
|
6.07
|
|
|
|
1.76
|
|
|
|
10,641
|
|
|
|
1.76
|
|
1.95 to 2.07
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
|
|
9.43
|
|
|
|
1.95
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
1.96
|
|
2.16
|
|
|
4,300
|
|
|
|
9.21
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
|
2.18 to 2.25
|
|
|
3,253
|
|
|
|
7.77
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
1,744
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
2.26 to 3.57
|
|
|
3,365
|
|
|
|
8.64
|
|
|
|
2.86
|
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
|
3.57 to 4.32
|
|
|
3,929
|
|
|
|
8.40
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
4.35 to 72.13
|
|
|
1,555
|
|
|
|
6.45
|
|
|
|
15.70
|
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
|
|
21.10
|
|
89.25
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
|
|
|
89.25
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
89.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.30 to 89.25
|
|
|
32,215
|
|
|
|
7.45
|
|
|
$
|
2.84
|
|
|
|
19,786
|
|
|
$
|
2.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The weighted-average fair value of options granted during the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $2.31,
$3.37 and $1.58, respectively. The total number of shares
exercisable was 19.8 million, 14.3 million and
11.6 million at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. The weighted average exercise price at those dates
was $2.91, $3.25 and $3.47, respectively.
In 2003, as a result of previously established employment
agreements, the Company accelerated the vesting of 1,162,945
options and extended the exercise period related to the
departure of former officers and recorded a non-cash charge
amounting to $2.6 million.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
In July 1999, the Company adopted, and the stockholders
approved, the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(ESPP). Under the terms of the ESPP, the initial
aggregate number of shares of stock that could be issued was
750,000, cumulatively increased on January 1, 2000 and each
January 1 thereafter until and including January 1, 2009 by
an amount equal to one-half of one percent (.5%) of the
outstanding shares of stock as of the preceding
December 31; provided, however, that the aggregate shares
reserved under the plan did not exceed 5,000,000 shares. In
January 2004 and 2003, the amount available under the plan was
increased by 604,360 and 592,234 shares, respectively.
Employees could choose to have up to 15% of their annual base
earnings withheld, but not to exceed $15,000, to purchase the
Companys common stock. The purchase price of the common
stock would be 85% of the lesser of the fair market value as of
the beginning or ending of the offering period in February and
August, as defined in the plan. The first offering period
started on August 1, 1999. During 2004 and 2003, the
Company issued 1,405,367 and 1,243,105 shares,
respectively, of common stock under the ESPP at a weighted
average issuance price of $1.02 and $0.67 per share,
respectively. The Company terminated the ESPP in December 2004.
During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
the Company issued 105,450, 77,250, and 436,588 shares of
restricted stock, respectively, to certain members of the
Companys Board of Directors. The shares vest over three
years. The charges associated with the issuance of these shares
were $219,000 for 2005 shares, $367,000 for
2004 shares and $344,000 for 2003 shares and are being
recognized over their respective vesting period. There were an
additional 115,740 and 70,922 restricted shares issued to the
chief executive officer resulting in charges of $250,000 and
$300,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Throughout 1998 and 1999, the Company issued warrants to
purchase 910,836 shares of common stock at a weighted
average price of $21.18 per share to MLSs that agreed
to provide their real estate listings to the Company for
publication on its web site. All warrants issued were
fully-vested, non-forfeitable and were immediately exercisable.
The Company incurred a total non-cash charge of approximately
$11.2 million, which was recognized as expense over the
term of the applicable MLS agreements, ranging from one to two
years. Through the year ended December 31, 2001, warrants
to purchase 368,859 shares of the Companys common
stock were exercised at a weighted average exercise price of
$20.00 per share. None have been exercised since 2001.
Throughout 2000, the Company issued warrants to purchase
31,680 shares of the Companys common stock at a
weighted average exercise price of $85.45 per share to
MLSs that agreed to provide their real estate listings to
the Company for publication on its web sites. All warrants
issued were fully vested, non-forfeitable and were immediately
exercisable. The Company incurred a total non-cash charge of
approximately $1.8 million, which was recognized as expense
over the term of the applicable MLS agreement, ranging from two
to three years. In October 2001, the Company reduced the
exercise price of the warrants to $27.95, and recognized an
additional $3.0 million charge which was recognized over
the remaining term of the agreements.
During the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company issued
a warrant to purchase 40,000 shares at $88.12 as part of a
consumer web site operating agreement with the Manufactured
Homes Institute (MHI) wherein the Company would be
the exclusive provider of web sites, home pages, electronic mail
and similar Internet related
71
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
products and services to MHI members and MHI would provide the
Company with joint marketing activities and access to member
lists and other materials. The Company recorded a prepaid asset
of approximately $2.7 million and has a remaining balance
of $1.1 million as of December 31, 2005 and
$1.4 million as of December 31, 2004.
During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company issued
a warrant to purchase 240,000 shares at $2.07 as part of a
consulting agreement. The warrant was immediately vested and the
charge associated with this warrant was recognized upon the
issuance of the warrant and was not material to the
Companys financial results. This warrant expires in 2006.
The Company recognized $0.3 million, $0.3 million and
$1.2 million in stock-based charges for the years ending
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, in
connection with the issuance of all warrants. At
December 31, 2005, warrants to purchase 280,000 shares
of common stock were outstanding with a weighted-average
exercise price of $14.36 per share.
|
|
15.
|
Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock
|
On November 6, 2005, the Company entered into a Preferred
Stock Purchase Agreement (Agreement) with Elevation
Partners, L.P. and such affiliates as Elevation designated (the
Purchasers) to sell to the Purchasers
100,000 shares of its Series B Convertible
Participating Preferred Stock (Series B Preferred
Stock) for an aggregate purchase price of
$100 million. The transaction was exempt from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. The transaction closed on November 29, 2005. The
net proceeds of $94.1 million from the issuance of the
Series B Preferred Stock are net of issuance costs of
$5.9 million, and are classified as mezzanine equity due to
certain change of control provisions which provide for
redemption outside the control of the Company. The Company
determined that due to those change of control provisions, the
Series B Preferred Stock should be recorded on the
Companys financial statements as though it consisted of
two components: (i) convertible preferred stock (the
Host Contract) with a 3.5% annual dividend, and
(ii) an embedded derivative (the Embedded
Derivative) which reflected the right of the holders of
the Series B Preferred Stock to receive additional
guaranteed dividends in the event of a change of control. The
Series B Preferred Stock reported on the Companys
consolidated balance sheet consists only of the value of the
Host Contract (less issuance costs) plus the amount of accretion
for issuance costs and accrued dividends. Such discount and
issuance costs are being accreted over the life of the
Series B Preferred Stock with such accretion being recorded
as a reduction in retained earnings. During the year ended
December 31, 2005, the Company recorded accretion on the
issuance costs of approximately $99,000. The Company determined
that the fair value of the Embedded Derivative as of
December 31, 2005 was $3.1 million and recorded the
amount in Other non-current liabilities. The value of this
Embedded Derivative will require mark to market accounting with
any future adjustments being recorded through the income
statement.
The Series B Preferred Stock has an aggregate liquidation
preference of $100 million plus all accrued and unpaid
dividends. The Series B Preferred Stock will be convertible
into the Companys common stock at a conversion price of
$4.20 per share, subject to certain adjustment upon certain
events. Based on the number of shares of common stock
outstanding as of December 31, 2005, if all shares of
Series B Preferred Stock were converted they would
represent approximately 14% of the Companys outstanding
common stock. The Series B Preferred Stock will pay a
quarterly dividend of 3.5% per annum of the original price
per share, payable in additional Series B Preferred Stock,
for the first five years following issuance, after which such
dividends will be paid only in cash. After the third anniversary
of the issuance, the Company may cause all of the Series B
Preferred Stock to be converted to the Companys common
stock if the closing price per share of the Companys
common stock during any 30 consecutive trading days is at least
$7.77. The Company may not redeem the Series B Preferred
Stock until after the fifth anniversary of the issuance, and
must redeem it on the seventh anniversary if not converted to
common stock.
In the event of a change of control, the Company will be
required to offer to repurchase all of the outstanding shares of
Series B Preferred Stock for total cash equal to 100% of
the liquidation preference (or, if such change of
72
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
control occurs after the six month anniversary of the issuance,
101% of the liquidation preference). If a change of control
occurs within five years after the issuance of the Series B
Preferred Stock, and the price per share of common stock in such
change of control is less than $7.98, then the Company will be
required to issue additional shares of Series B Preferred
Stock, or in certain instances cash, in an amount equal to the
regular dividends such shares the Purchasers would have received
from the date of repurchase following the change of control
until the fifth anniversary of the issuance of the shares. In no
event would the Company be obligated to issue Series B
Preferred Shares or cash equating to more than three years of
dividends.
The Series B Preferred Stock ranks senior to the common
stock of the Company and junior to the Companys
Series A Preferred Stock, and votes as a single class with
the common stock on any matter to come before the stockholders
of the Company, with each share of Series B Preferred Stock
being entitled to cast a number of votes equal to the number of
shares of Common Stock into which it is then convertible. The
Agreement contains customary anti-dilution provisions.
The holders of the Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to
elect two Directors to the Companys Board of Directors.
The Purchasers are required to vote their shares in the manner
recommended by the Board with respect to the election or removal
of directors, other than any directors designated by the
Purchasers.
The Stockholders Agreement requires the consent of the holders
of the Series B Preferred Stock before the Company may
engage in the following: (i) incurrence of certain
additional indebtedness; (ii) certain divestitures,
acquisitions or other business reorganizations;
(iii) filing for bankruptcy protection;
(iv) transactions with affiliates in excess of $100,000;
and (v) payment of any dividend on, or the redemption or
repurchase of, common stock in aggregate amounts of
$10 million or more. The Stockholders Agreement also
provides the Purchasers with certain rights to register shares
of common stock upon conversion of the Series B Preferred
Stock. The Purchasers are entitled to three demand registration
rights, which may include shelf registration beginning two years
from date of issuance, subject to certain dollar and share
number thresholds. The Purchasers are also entitled to piggyback
registration rights.
A summary of activity related to the Series B Preferred
Stock is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Proceeds
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
Costs and expenses of issuance
|
|
|
(5,924
|
)
|
Embedded derivative liability
|
|
|
(3,137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net convertible preferred stock at
issuance
|
|
|
90,939
|
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
99
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net convertible preferred stock @
12/31/2005
|
|
$
|
91,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004, the Company had authorized the
issuance of one share of Series A Preferred Stock. At
December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, one share of
Series A Preferred Stock was issued and outstanding and
held by NAR. The holder of Series A Preferred Stock has the
following rights:
Voting Except as provided in this
paragraph, the Series A preferred stockholder is not
entitled to notice of any stockholders meetings and shall
not be entitled to vote on any matters with respect to any
question upon which holders of common stock or preferred stock
have the right to vote, except as may be required by law (and,
in any such case, the Series A Preferred Stock shall have
one vote per share and shall vote together with the common stock
as a single class). The holder of Series A Preferred Stock
is entitled to elect one director of the Company. If there is
any vacancy in the office of a director elected by the holder of
the Series A Preferred Stock, then a director to hold
office for the unexpired term of such directorship may be
elected by the vote or written consent of the holder of the
73
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Series A Preferred Stock. The provisions dealing with
preferred stockholders rights included in the Certificate of
Incorporation may not be amended without the approval of the
holder of the Series A Preferred Stock.
Dividends In each calendar year, the
holder of the Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to
receive, when, as and if declared by the Board, non-cumulative
dividends in an amount equal to $0.08 per share (as
appropriately adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends,
recapitalizations and the like), prior and in preference to the
payment of any dividend on the common stock in such calendar
year. If, after dividends in the full preferential amounts
specified in this section for the Series A Preferred Stock
have been paid or declared and set apart in any calendar year of
the Company, the holder of Series A Preferred Stock shall
have no further rights to receive any further dividends that the
Board may declare or pay in that calendar year.
Liquidation In the event of any
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, whether
voluntary or involuntary, the Series A Preferred
Stockholder is entitled to receive, prior and in preference to
any payment or distribution on any shares of common stock, an
amount per share equal to $1.00 per share of Series A
Preferred Stock. After payment of such amount, any further
amounts available for distribution shall be distributed among
the holders of common stock and the holders of preferred stock
other than Series A Preferred Stock, if any, entitled to
receive such distributions.
Redemption Upon the earlier to occur of
(i) termination of that certain operating agreement dated
November 26, 1996, as the same may be amended from time to
time (the operating agreement), or (ii) NAR
ceases to own at least 149,778 shares of common stock of
the Company, or (iii) the existence and continuance of a
material breach by NAR of that certain Joint Ownership
Agreement, dated as of November 26, 1996, between NAR, and
subsidiaries of the Company, or the Trademark License dated as
of November 26, 1996, by and between NAR and the Company,
at any time thereafter the Company may, at the option of the
Board, redeem the Series A preferred. The redemption price
for each share of Series A preferred shall be
$1.00 per share.
Conversion Each share of Series A
Preferred Stock shall automatically be converted into one share
of common stock upon any sale, transfer, pledge, or other
disposition of the share of Series A Preferred Stock to any
person or entity other than the initial holder of such share of
Series A Preferred Stock, or any successor by operation of
law that functions as a non-profit trade association for
REALTORS®
under Section 501(c)(6) of Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended, that owns the
REALTOR®
trademark, or any wholly-owned affiliate of such holder as long
as the holder continues to own such affiliate.
Repurchase
of Common Stock
During 2003, the Company repurchased 31,765 shares of
common stock for approximately $38,000, in exchange for the
cancellation of notes payable to the Company of equal value.
Issuance
of Common Stock
In May 2004, in accordance with an order entered by the District
Court, the Company issued 20.0 million shares of its common
stock in connection with the settlement of the Securities
Class Action Lawsuit. The fair value of the shares on the
date the settlement was approved was $50.6 million which
was recorded as expense in the year ended December 31, 2003.
In May 2004 the Company issued 200,000 shares of its common
stock with a fair value of $560,000 in settlement of the
derivative litigation. The Company had previously accrued for
the expense of this settlement.
In July 2004, pursuant to the settlement of three lawsuits
brought by certain former shareholders of Top Producer Systems,
Inc., the Company (i) issued 2,097,984 shares of
common stock in satisfaction of the remaining installments of
the Companys purchase price of Top
Producer®
that were due in 2003, 2004 and 2005, (ii) issued
151,064 shares of common stock and paid $104,000 in cash in
satisfaction of non-competition payments due to the former
president of Top
Producer®
and (iii) issued 75,988 shares of common stock in
settlement of the various
74
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
claims. The fair value of these shares was $8.7 million of
which $7.9 million had previously been accrued resulting in
a $0.8 million settlement charge in the year ended
December 31, 2004.
Also in July 2004, pursuant to the settlement of a lawsuit
brought by certain former owners and directors of iPlace, the
Company issued 177,631 shares of its common stock and paid
$700,000 in cash. As a result of this settlement, the Company
recoded a litigation settlement charge of approximately
$1.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2004.
In July 2005, pursuant to an amendment to its operating
agreement with the National Association of Homebuilders (NAHB),
the Company issued 150,000 shares of its common stock to
the NAHB. As a result of this amendment and subsequent stock
issuance, the Company satisfied an existing obligation to the
NAHB and recorded additional royalty expense of $101,000 in the
year ended December 31, 2005.
The Company recognized $0.3 million, $0.3 million and
$1.1 million in stock-based charges in connection with the
issuance of common stock for the years ended December 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
|
|
17.
|
Net
Income (Loss) per Share
|
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted net income (loss) per share applicable to common
stockholders for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(310
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,501
|
)
|
|
$
|
(46,373
|
)
|
Gain on disposition of
discontinued operations
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
7,294
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(679
|
)
|
|
|
(3,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
(7,886
|
)
|
|
|
(47,124
|
)
|
Convertible preferred stock
dividend
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: net income (loss) applicable
to Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
(7,886
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares
outstanding
|
|
|
147,175
|
|
|
|
136,518
|
|
|
|
118,996
|
|
Dilutive effect of options,
warrants and restricted stock
|
|
|
11,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of assumed
conversion of convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
23,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully diluted weighted average
shares outstanding
|
|
|
182,548
|
|
|
|
136,518
|
|
|
|
118,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) applicable to
common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) applicable
to common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Because their effects would be anti-dilutive for the periods
presented, the above computation of diluted income (loss) per
share excludes preferred stock, options and warrants of
6,568,656, 28,204,581, and 22,847,784 for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.
|
|
18.
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
|
During the year ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
The Company paid $75,000 in interest.
|
|
|
|
The Company issued 150,000 shares of stock to settle
contractual obligations of $318,000.
|
|
|
|
The Company issued 115,740 shares of restricted common
stock to its Chief Executive Officer. These shares vest over
three years. The expense associated with these shares was
$250,000 and was recognized in 2005.
|
|
|
|
The Company issued 105,450 shares of restricted common
stock to certain members of its Board of Directors. Theses
shares vest over three years. The charge associated with these
shares was $219,000 and is being recognized over the three-year
vesting period.
|
|
|
|
The Company excluded $1.8 million of capital expenditures
and associated accounts payable recorded at the end of December
2005 as these purchases were subsequently funded through an
equipment financing arrangement in January 2006.
|
During the year ended December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
The Company paid $62,000 in interest.
|
|
|
|
The Company sold two of its business units generating net
proceeds of $9.5 million and a gain on sale of
$7.3 million.
|
|
|
|
The Company sold its Welcome
Wagon®
facility generating net proceeds of $6.3 million and a gain
on sale of $1.4 million.
|
|
|
|
The Company issued 20 million shares of stock and paid
$3.0 million in settlement of the Securities
Class Action lawsuit that had previously been accrued at
$53.6 million.
|
|
|
|
The Company issued 200,000 shares of stock and paid
$150,000 in settlement of the derivative litigation suit which
had previously been accrued at $710,000.
|
|
|
|
The Company issued 2.3 million shares of stock in
settlement of the Top
Producer®
litigation resulting in an additional charge of $793,000 against
an existing accrual of $7.9 million.
|
|
|
|
The Company granted 70,922 shares of restricted common
stock to its Chief Executive Officer. These shares vest over
three years. The expense associated with these shares was
$300,000 and was recognized in 2004.
|
|
|
|
The Company issued 77,250 shares of restricted common stock
to certain members of its Board of Directors. These shares vest
over three years. The charge associated with these shares was
$367,000 and is being recognized over the three-year vesting
period.
|
|
|
|
The Company funded $3.2 million of capital expenditure
through an equipment lease financing arrangement.
|
During the year ended December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
The Company paid $103,000 in interest.
|
|
|
|
The Company was required to accelerate 1,162,945 options for
terminated former executives and incurred a $2,609,000 expense
in 2003.
|
76
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
The Company issued 436,000 shares of restricted stock to
certain members of the Companys Board of Directors. These
shares vest over three years. The charge associated with the
issuance of these shares was $344,000 and is being recognized
over the three-year vesting period.
|
|
|
|
The Company funded $2.1 million of capital expenditures
through an equipment lease financing arrangement.
|
|
|
19.
|
Defined
Contribution Plan
|
The Company has a savings plan (Savings Plan) that
qualifies as a defined contribution plan under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the
Savings Plan, participating employees may defer a percentage
(not to exceed 15%) of their eligible pretax earnings up to the
Internal Revenue Services annual contribution limit. All
full-time employees on the payroll of the Company are eligible
to participate in the Plan. The Company pays all general and
administrative expenses of the plan and may make contributions
to the plan. The Company made matching contributions of
approximately $1.5 million during the year ended
December 31, 2005. There were no matching contributions
during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.
As a result of net operating losses, the Company has not
recorded a provision for income taxes. The components of the
deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance at
December 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
370,174
|
|
|
$
|
357,067
|
|
Deferred expenses
|
|
|
11,230
|
|
|
|
14,889
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
6,232
|
|
|
|
2,863
|
|
Amortization of acquired
intangible assets
|
|
|
11,098
|
|
|
|
3,748
|
|
Other
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,444
|
|
|
|
379,191
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(399,444
|
)
|
|
|
(379,191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired
intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on managements assessment, the Company has placed a
valuation reserve against its otherwise recognizable deferred
tax assets due to the likelihood that the Company may not
generate sufficient taxable income during the carryforward
period to utilize the net operating loss carryforwards. The
valuation reserve for net deferred taxes was increased by
approximately $20.3 million primarily as a result of the
increase to the deferred tax asset relating to the current year
operating loss for tax purposes, minus the use of net operating
losses used to offset branch income, an adjustment of other
deferred tax assets, and the reduction to the valuation
allowance to offset current year permanent items as detailed
above.
77
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Included in the deferred tax assets are net operating losses
from acquired entities. To the extent that the valuation
allowance recorded in connection with the acquisition of tax
carryforwards is subsequently released, it will be credited
directly to goodwill.
The difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective
tax rate is due to permanent differences and a valuation reserve
placed against the Companys deferred tax assets.
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company had gross net
operating loss carryforwards for federal and foreign income tax
purposes of approximately $1,012.6 million and
$975.9 million, respectively, which begin to expire in
2008. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company had gross
net operating loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes
of approximately $500.6 million and $492.5 million,
respectively, which begin to expire in 2007. The state gross net
operating loss carryforward was adjusted downward as a result of
having reassessed the total state net operating loss to account
for the Companys filing structure, offset by a current
year projected tax loss of $59.8 million. Gross net
operating loss carryforwards for both federal and state tax
purposes may be subject to an annual limitation under relevant
tax laws.
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the gross deferred tax asset
included approximately $0.4 million related to warrants.
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the gross net operating loss
carryforwards for federal and foreign income tax purposes
included approximately $1.5 million and $7.1 million
of Canadian gross net operating losses, respectively.
|
|
21.
|
Settlements
of Disputes and Litigation
|
Settlement
of AOL Dispute
In January 2003, the Company entered into a marketing agreement
with America Online, Inc. (AOL) that resolved its
dispute with AOL and terminated the obligations under a prior
marketing agreement. Under the January 2003 marketing agreement,
the Company has maintained the exclusive right to provide AOL
with real estate listings, and AOL retained access to the
Companys professional content. The Company paid AOL
$7.5 million in cash to terminate the previous agreement
and allowed AOL to fully draw down on an existing
$90.0 million letter of credit secured by restricted cash
at December 31, 2002. Termination of the previous agreement
also eliminated the Companys responsibility to provide AOL
with an additional make-whole payment in July 2003,
which would have been approximately $57.0 million, payable
in cash or stock. Transfer restrictions relating to the
approximately 3.9 million shares of the Companys
common stock issued to AOL under the previous agreement were
also removed.
In connection with the settlement with AOL, the Company reduced
its accrued distribution obligation and accrued expenses by
$189.9 million and $4.2 million, respectively, and
allowed AOL to draw down on the $90.0 million letter of
credit. Accordingly, the Company recorded a gain on settlement
of the distribution agreement of $104.1 million, which is
included as gain on settlement of distribution agreement in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended
December 31, 2003.
Settlement
of Securities Class Action Lawsuit
Beginning in December 2001, numerous separate complaints
purporting to be class actions were filed in various
jurisdictions alleging that the Company and certain of its
current and former officers and directors violated certain
provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The
complaints contain varying allegations, including that the
Company made materially false and misleading statements with
respect to the Companys 2000 and 2001 financial results
included in the Companys filings with the SEC, analysts
reports, press releases and media reports. The complaints sought
an unspecified amount of damages. In March 2002, the California
State Teachers Retirement System was named lead plaintiff
(the Plaintiff), and the complaints were
consolidated in the United States District Court, Central
District of California. In November 2002, the Plaintiff filed a
first amended consolidated class action complaint
(Securities Class Action Lawsuit) naming the
Company, certain of its
78
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
current officers, directors and employees, certain of the
Companys former officers, directors and employees, and
various other parties, including, among others
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, as defendants. The amended complaint
made various allegations, including that the Company violated
federal securities laws, and sought an unspecified amount of
damages.
In August 2003, the Company entered into a settlement agreement
with the Plaintiff to resolve all outstanding claims against the
Company in the Securities Class Action Lawsuit. In May
2004, the District Court entered final judgment and an order of
dismissal with prejudice of the Securities Class Action
Lawsuit as to the Company. The final judgment includes a bar
order providing for the maximum protection to which the Company
is entitled under the law with respect to all future claims,
whether under federal, state or common law. In June 2004, an
objector to the settlement filed a notice of appeal. The Company
and Plaintiff reached a settlement with the objector and the
objector filed a dismissal of the appeal in March 2005.
As part of the settlement, we agreed to pay $13.0 million
in cash and issue 20 million new shares of our common stock
valued at $50.6 million as of August 12, 2003. In
accordance with an order entered by the District Court in May
2004, the $13.0 million and the 20.0 million shares
were issued to Plaintiffs counsel to be held in trust
pending distribution to the members of the class. In July 2005,
the cash was distributed and in August 2005, the shares were
distributed to the class and Plaintiffs counsel in
accordance with the judgment, except for the members of the
class whose dismissal as defendants in the Securities
Class Action Lawsuit is pending appeal. As a result of the
settlement, the Company recorded a litigation settlement charge
of $63.6 million in its operating results in the year ended
December 31, 2003. In addition, the Company has adopted
certain corporate governance principles, including requirements
for independent directors and special committees, the agreement
to appoint a new shareholder-nominated director, prohibition on
the future use of stock options for director compensation,
minimum stock retention by officers after exercise of future
stock option grants, and elimination of the classification of
the Board of Directors such that beginning with the 2008 annual
stockholders meeting, all directors will be elected at
each annual meeting for a term of one year. The Company will
also divide equally with the class any future net proceeds from
insurance with respect to the litigation after provision for
legal expenses incurred by the Company. Members of the class who
participated in the settlement have released and discharged all
claims against the Company. The Company is aware that several
persons, who purportedly acquired the Companys shares
during the class period during January 1, 2000 through
December 21, 2002, representing approximately 1% of our
outstanding shares, have notified the Plaintiff that they wish
to be excluded from the settlement, and some of those persons
have filed litigation against the Company. Moreover, the Company
could be subject to claims that may not have been discharged or
barred by the settlement, including potential claims by Cendant
Corporation (Cendant) described below.
In March 2003, the court in the Securities Class Action
Lawsuit dismissed with prejudice Cendant as a defendant.
However, that dismissal has been appealed to the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. In October 2004, the
Securities and Exchange Commission filed an amicus brief in
support of the appeal. If Cendants dismissal as a
defendant in the Securities Class Action Lawsuit is
reversed on appeal and Cendant is subsequently found liable or
settles the claims against it in the Securities
Class Action Lawsuit, Cendant will likely seek
indemnification, contribution or similar relief from the Company
up to the amount for which it is held liable or for which it
settles. However, in March 2004, as part of the Companys
settlement of the Securities Class Action Lawsuit, the
United States District Court issued an order approving the
settlement and barring claims by third parties against the
Company for indemnification, contribution and similar relief
with respect to liability such third parties may have in the
Securities Class Action Lawsuit.
The March 2004 order may preclude Cendant from seeking
indemnification, contribution or similar relief from the Company
in the event Cendant is found liable or settles claims against
it in the Securities Class Action Lawsuit. However, the
Company has been advised by counsel that the law is unclear on
whether Cendant would be so precluded. Therefore, the Company
would likely incur significant expenses in defending such an
action by Cendant and could ultimately be found liable to
Cendant or settle with Cendant, notwithstanding the bar order.
Such
79
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
expenses, liability or settlement could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys results of operations and financial
position.
In addition, if Cendant is not permitted to share in the
settlement of the Securities Class Action Lawsuit (which
would be the case if its dismissal as a defendant is reversed on
appeal), the Company has agreed to pay or otherwise provide to
Cendant the amount of money
and/or other
consideration that Cendant would have been otherwise entitled to
receive from that portion of the class action settlement fund
provided by the Company had Cendant been a class member and
Cendants proof of claim in respect of its shares had been
accepted in full. At this time, Cendant is still a member of the
class and has not been excluded, but is one of the members of
the class whose dismissal as a defendant is pending appeal. As
such, Cendant has not yet received any cash or shares of stock
we paid in the settlement. The Company estimates that Cendant
could be entitled to receive approximately $2.3 million in
cash and approximately 3.79 million shares from the Company
should Cendant be prevented from participating in the settlement.
Settlement
of Derivative Litigation
In January 2002, Robert Sparaco filed a complaint in California
Superior Court, Los Angeles County, derivatively on the
Companys behalf as nominal defendant, against certain of
the Companys current and former officers and directors.
Two additional shareholder derivative actions were filed against
substantially the same defendants on the Companys behalf
as nominal defendant. The three derivative actions alleged
breaches of fiduciary duty, negligence, abuse of control,
misconduct, waste of corporate assets and other violations of
state law. In March 2002, the court entered an order
consolidating the three actions. In November 2002, the
plaintiffs filed a
first-amended
consolidated shareholder derivative complaint. The complaint
sought an unspecified amount of damages.
In January 2002, Jeff Joerg filed a complaint in Delaware
Chancery Court, derivatively on the Companys behalf as
nominal defendant, against certain of the Companys current
and former officers and directors. The complaint alleged that
defendants breached their fiduciary duties by failing to
maintain adequate accounting controls and by employing improper
accounting practices and procedures. The complaint sought an
unspecified amount of damages.
In January 2004, the Company entered into a settlement to
resolve the California Superior Court (Sparaco) and Delaware
Chancery Court (Joerg) derivative actions. In consideration for
plaintiffs release of all claims, the Company agreed to
adopt the corporate governance reforms set forth in the
Securities Class Action Lawsuit settlement upon final
judicial approval of the settlement, that it was in the best
interests of the Company to terminate its relationship with
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys auditors (which
the Audit Committee did in September 2003); and to pay
plaintiffs attorneys fees in the sum of $150,000 in
cash and 200,000 shares of the Companys stock. The
conditions of the settlement include approval by the United
States District Court of the Securities Class Action
Lawsuit settlement, approval by the California Superior Court of
the consolidated shareholder derivative action settlement and
the dismissal with prejudice of the California and Delaware
actions. On March 16, 2004, the United States District
Court issued an order approving the Securities Class Action
settlement and on March 26, 2004, the Superior Court
approved the consolidated shareholder derivative settlement. In
May 2004, the Company paid these fees, and issued the
200,000 shares of common stock in a transaction exempt from
registration by Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of
1933. The Company had previously accrued for the expense of the
settlement.
Settlement
of Other Litigation
In July 2005, Stuart Wolff (Wolff), Homestores
former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, filed a suit
against Homestore in the Delaware Chancery Court in New Castle
County. The complaint sought advancement of expenses (including
attorneys fees) purportedly incurred and to be incurred by
Wolff in connection with the SEC and the United States
Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations and
certain civil actions filed against Wolff.
80
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Effective September 28, 2005, the Company entered into a
settlement agreement with Wolff. The settlement agreement called
for the Company to reimburse Wolff for expenses up to a maximum
of $11.0 million. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, as
of December 31, 2005, the Company paid Wolff approximately
$10.0 million for expenses that he had already incurred,
and, pursuant to a January 3, 2006 Grantor
Trust Agreement, has deposited the balance (approximately
$1.0 million) into a trust account, out of which additional
reimbursement payments will be made to Wolff. In the event Wolff
ultimately incurs less than $11.0 million, the amount
remaining in the trust account will be returned to Homestore.
Pursuant to the settlement agreement, Homestore and Wolff
exchanged releases of all claims they may have against each
other, including Homestores claim for repayment of any of
the amounts paid to Wolff under the agreement. On
September 29, 2005, Mr. Wolff dismissed the Delaware
court action with prejudice. The Company has no further
financial obligations to Wolff. The Company recorded legal costs
associated with Wolff of approximately $8.0 million and
$3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively, which have been reflected as general and
administrative expenses.
In October 2003, Peter Tafeen (Tafeen), a former
officer of Homestore, filed suit in the Delaware Chancery Court
in New Castle County. The complaint asserted a claim for
advancement of fees and expenses already incurred and for future
expenses to be incurred in connection with the SEC and DOJ
investigations and the civil actions filed against Tafeen for
his purported role in a scheme to inflate the Companys
revenues. Tafeen and the Company filed cross-motions for summary
judgment. In March 2004, the Court denied a revised Memorandum
of Opinion denying both summary judgment motions and directed
that the case go to trial. The trial concluded in July 2004. In
October 2004, the Court ruled that the Company is obligated to
advance to Tafeen all reasonable attorneys fees and costs
associated with the various legal proceedings in which Tafeen is
involved by reason of his service as an officer of the Company,
as well as Tafeens fees in prosecuting the action before
the Court. In April 2005, the Court entered final judgment
requiring the Company to advance expenses to Mr. Tafeen in
the amount of $4.2 million which were paid in June 2005.
Under the Courts final judgment, the Company was also
required to advance future expenses incurred for his defense,
pending the outcome of the criminal and civil actions. Through
February 22, 2006, the Company advanced an additional
$2.1 million for attorneys fees and costs.
Effective February 22, 2006, the Company entered into a
settlement agreement with Tafeen. The settlement agreement
called for the Company to reimburse Tafeen for expenses up to a
maximum of $11.85 million. As of February 15, 2006,
the Company had reimbursed Tafeen approximately
$6.4 million for expenses that he had already incurred and,
pursuant to a February 21, 2006 Grantor
Trust Agreement, deposited the balance (approximately
$5.5 million) into a trust account, out of which additional
reimbursement payments will be made to Tafeen. In the event
Tafeen ultimately incurs less than $11.85 million, the
amount remaining in the trust account will be returned to
Homestore. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, Homestore and
Tafeen exchanged releases of all claims they may have against
each other, including Homestores claim for repayment of
any of the amounts paid to Tafeen under the agreement. On
February 23, 2006, Mr. Tafeen dismissed the Delaware
court action with prejudice. The Company has no further
financial obligations to Tafeen. The Company recorded legal
costs associated with Tafeen of approximately $4.1 million
and $7.75 million for the years ended December 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively, which have been reflected as
general and administrative expenses.
In December 2001, Pentawave, Inc. and its principal stockholder,
Bruce Culver (Plaintiffs), filed a suit for fraud,
securities fraud, rescission, breach of contract and defamation
in Ventura County Superior Court seeking approximately
$5.0 million in compensatory damages, plus punitive
damages. In December 2005, the parties reached a settlement
wherein the Company agreed to pay Plaintiffs $1.75 million
in exchange for a dismissal, with prejudice, of the entire
action. The Company finalized the settlement in February 2006.
As a result of the settlement, the Company recorded a litigation
settlement charge of $1.75 million in the year ended
December 31, 2005.
In April 2004, the U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour
Division (the DOL), commenced a preliminary
investigation into the Companys compliance with the Fair
Labor Standards Act with regard to job classifications. The DOL
and the Company entered into a settlement on September 30,
2004 in connection with the DOLs investigation pursuant to
which the Company, without admitting liability, agreed to
(1) convert its account
81
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
executives to non-exempt classifications effective
October 11, 2004; and (2) make payments of
approximately $1.4 million to 434 current and former
account executives for past overtime compensation under Federal
law. These payments were made in October 2004 and have been
reflected as sales and marketing expenses in the year ended
December 31, 2004.
In September 2004, Elizabeth Hathaway (Hathaway)
filed a class action lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court on
behalf of herself and all current and former account executives
employed by the Company, alleging that the Company misclassified
account executives as exempt from overtime wage requirements in
violation of California law. Hathaway sought back wages,
interest and attorneys fees. On March 11, 2005,
Hathaway and the Company reached a settlement for
$1.4 million which was reflected as sales and marketing
expenses in the year ended December 31, 2005. The court
granted final approval of the settlement on October 6,
2005. Settlement funds for settling class members were
transferred to a trust on October 11, 2005, and
distribution of the settlement proceeds took place in December
2005.
In June 2004, the Company entered into an agreement providing
for the settlement of three lawsuits brought against it by
certain former shareholders of Top
Producer®
in connection with the acquisition of Top
Producer®
in May 2000. Pursuant to this settlement, in July 2004, the
Company (i) issued 2,097,984 shares of common stock in
satisfaction of the remaining installments of the Companys
purchase price of Top
Producer®
that were due in 2003, 2004 and 2005, (ii) issued
151,064 shares of common stock and paid $104,000 in cash in
satisfaction of non-competition payments due to the former
president of Top
Producer®,
and (iii) issued an additional 75,988 shares of common
stock in settlement of the various claims. Issuance of the
shares was exempt from registration under Section 3(a)(10)
of the Securities Act of 1933. As a result of the acceleration
of the remaining installments of the purchase price and the
issuance of additional stock to settle this dispute, the Company
recorded a litigation settlement charge of $793,000 in the year
ended December 31, 2004.
On July 6, 2004, the Company settled a lawsuit brought
against it by certain former owners and directors of iPlace.
Pursuant to this settlement, on July 9, 2004, the Company
issued to the plaintiffs 177,631 shares of the
Companys common stock and paid $700,000 in cash. The
issuance of the shares in the settlement was exempt from
registration under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act
of 1933. As a result of the settlement, the Company recorded a
litigation settlement charge of approximately $1.4 million
in the year ended December 31, 2004.
|
|
22.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
and Capital Leases
The Company leases certain facilities and equipment under
non-cancelable operating leases with various expiration dates
through 2008. The leases generally contain renewal options and
payments that may be adjusted for increases in operating
expenses and increases in the Consumer Price Index. Certain
equipment leases constitute capital leases. The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the assets and
liabilities arising from these capital lease obligations. Future
minimum lease payments under these capital and operating leases
as of
82
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2005 are net of actual sublease arrangements
and exclusive of estimated sublease income used in the
restructuring provision (See Note 4) are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
1,021
|
|
|
$
|
9,820
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,328
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
2010 and thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,021
|
|
|
$
|
23,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Amount representing interest
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capital leases
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital leases
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the operating lease amounts above, $3.6 million has
already been accrued in restructuring accruals and is reflected
in accrued expenses and other non-current liabilities at
December 31, 2005.
Rental expense for the Company for operating leases was
$5.7 million, $5.6 million and $6.8 million for
the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
The contractual provisions of two of the Companys
facilities lease commitments required that the Company
collateralize the obligation with outstanding letters of credit,
resulting in $5.0 million classified as restricted cash at
December 31, 2005.
Distribution
Agreements
The Company has entered into various web portal distribution and
preferred alliance agreements which require the Company to make
certain scheduled payments over the term of the agreements
through 2007. The following presents the Companys future
minimum commitments under those agreements (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
14,975
|
|
2007
|
|
|
7,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Commitments
Additionally, under the Companys operating agreement with
NAR, the Company has an exclusive arrangement to operate
REALTOR.com®
as well as a license to use the
REALTOR.com®
domain name and trademark and the
REALTORS®
trademark in exchange for minimum annual royalty payments.
Commitments for the years ending 2007 and beyond will be
calculated based on amounts paid in the prior year adjusted for
the Annual Consumer Price
83
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Index for the period ending in the prior calendar year. The
following presents the Companys future minimum commitments
under the remaining NAR agreement (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
1,542
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments for the purchase of property, plant and equipment
were approximately $1.1 million as of December 31,
2005.
Legal
Proceedings
Contingencies
Related to Pending Litigation
Government
Investigations
In January 2002, the Company was notified that the SEC had
issued a formal order of private investigation in connection
with accounting matters that resulted in the restatement of the
Companys consolidated financial statements in March 2002.
The SEC requested that the Company provide it with certain
documents concerning the restatement and requested access to
certain of the Companys current and former employees for
interviews. The Company has cooperated and continues to
cooperate fully with the SECs investigation as well as a
parallel investigation by the DOJ.
Since September 2002, certain of the Companys former
employees have entered into plea agreements with the United
States Attorneys Office and the SEC in connection with the
SECs investigation. Also in September 2002, the SEC and
the DOJ informed the Company that, in light of the actions taken
by the Companys Board of Directors and the Companys
Audit Committee and the Companys cooperation in the
SECs investigation, those agencies would not bring any
enforcement action against the Company. In April 2005, a grand
jury in Los Angeles indicted two of our former officers, Stuart
Wolff and Peter Tafeen, in connection with the accounting
irregularities described above and on March 2, 2006, Peter
Tafeen pled guilty to one count of insider trading. The trial
for Wolff is scheduled to begin in March 2006. Because the SEC
and DOJ investigations are ongoing and the Company is committed
to continuing to cooperate with those investigations, the
Company will likely continue to incur additional costs related
to the investigation, including the cost of making documents
available to these agencies. In addition, the effect and
attention required to respond to the investigations could divert
managements attention from our business operations.
Insurance
Coverage Litigation
Between September 2002 and November 2002, Genesis Insurance
Company (Genesis), Federal Insurance Company
(Federal), Clarendon National Insurance Company
(Clarendon), Royal Indemnity Company
(Royal) and TIG Insurance Company of Michigan
(TIG) sent the Company notices of rescission of the
officers and directors liability policies issued to the Company
for the period of August 4, 2001 through August 4,
2002. The same carriers filed complaints to judicially confirm
the rescissions or for declaratory relief in the United States
District Court, Central District of California against the
Company and certain of its current and former officers,
directors and employees. The complaints allege
misrepresentations contained in the original applications for
insurance, the renewal applications and warranty letters.
84
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In October 2002, Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company
(Lumbermens) rescinded and filed a similar complaint
against the Company and certain of its current and former
officers, directors and employees to confirm the rescission in
the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
In February 2003, TIG dismissed its federal court rescission
action and filed a new rescission action against the Company and
certain of the Companys current and former officers and
directors in California State Superior Court.
In May 2003, XL Insurance Limited (Bermuda) sent the
Company a notice of rescission of the officers and directors
liability policy issued to the Company for the period
August 4, 2001 to August 4, 2002. The Company is in
discussions with Bermuda about possibly deferring any
arbitration over the insurers purported rescission pending
the resolution of the underlying liability lawsuits.
In May 2003, the United States District Court for the Central
District of California denied the Companys request that
the hearing on Federals motion for summary judgment be
continued to allow the Company to conduct discovery on the
issues presented by Federals motion, and granted
Federals motion for summary judgment declaring that the
directors and officers liability policy issued by Federal is
rescinded as to all insureds. In July 2003, the same Court
granted motions for summary judgment declaring that the
directors and officers liability policies issued by
Genesis, Royal and Clarendon are rescinded as to all insureds.
In February 2004, the California State Superior Court granted
the TIG and Lumbermens motions for summary judgment
declaring the directors and officers liability
policies issued by TIG and Lumbermens rescinded as to all
insureds. In July 2004, the Company initiated an appeal
from judgment in the California Court of Appeal. In view of the
Ninth Circuits decision affirming the District
Courts judgments in the federal actions, however, the
Company and Lumbermens agreed that the Company would
dismiss its appeal in the Lumbermens action, with
prejudice, due to a provision contained in the Policy issued by
Lumbermens, which provides that the Policy is
automatically rescinded should any underlying insurance policy
be rescinded by legal process. The California Court of Appeal
consequently dismissed the Lumbermens appeal, with
prejudice, in November 2005. The Company has continued to
vigorously contest the Superior Court judgment in the TIG case
on appeal. The appeal has been fully briefed, the Court of
Appeal heard oral argument in January 2006, and the matter has
been submitted to the Court for decision, which is expected at
any time. While the Company believes it has substantial
arguments in support of the appeal, the Company is unable to
express an opinion at this time as to the probably outcome of
these lawsuits.
If the Company were to prevail on its appeal in the TIG case,
the Company might possibly request that (1) the Ninth
Circuit recall its mandate and reconsider its decision in the
four federal actions in light of the state court of
appeals decision in the TIG case,
and/or
(2) the state court of appeal vacates its judgment in the
Lumbermens case and reconsiders the Companys appeal
in light of the state court of appeals decision in the TIG
case. Courts are highly reluctant to recall a mandate
and/or
vacate judgments, however, and the likelihood of a favorable
outcome on any such request is remote.
Other
Litigation
In June 2002, Tren Technologies Holdings LLC.,
(Tren) served a complaint on Homestore, NAR and NAHB
in the United States District Court, Eastern District of
Pennsylvania. Trens complaint alleged a claim for patent
infringement based on activities related to the web sites
REALTOR.com®
and
HomeBuilder.com®.
Specifically, Tren alleged that it owns a patent
(U.S. Patent No. 5,584,025) on an application, method
and system for tracking demographic customer information,
including tracking information related to real estate and real
estate demographics information, and that the Company has
developed an infringing technology for the NARs
REALTOR.com®
and the NAHBs
HomeBuilder.com®
web sites. Trens complaint sought an unspecified amount of
damages (including treble damages for willful infringement and
attorneys fees) and a permanent injunction against the
Company using the technology. In October 2003, Plaintiff Kevin
Keithley (Keithley) filed a complaint against the
Company, the NAR and the NAHB in the United States District
Court for the Northern District of California alleging
infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,584,025, the same
patent at issue in the Tren action. Keithleys complaint
85
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
sought an unspecified amount of damages (including treble
damages for willful infringement and attorneys fees) and a
permanent injunction against the Company using the technology.
In that complaint, Keithley asserts exclusive license of the
patent. The Company has filed an answer and counterclaim in the
Keithley action seeking a declaration of non-infringement and
invalidity of the patent at issue in these actions. Keithley has
answered the counterclaims. On May 22, 2004, the Company
filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office
(USPTO) a Request for Reexamination of the patent at
issue in these actions. The Court in the Tren action issued an
order dismissing that action, without prejudice, and stating
that the matter is to remain status quo and that the statute of
limitations is tolled, and further stating that the matter
remains active and any discovery and settlement discussions will
continue. In September 2004, a status conference was held in the
Tren action in which the Court informed the parties to contact
it after there has been further progress in the Reexamination
hearing. The Court in the Keithley action stayed that action
pending the Reexamination proceeding. In August 2005, the USPTO
indicated that it would confirm the original claims of the
patent and allow additional claims. Accordingly, the Court in
the Keithley action has lifted the stay and the parties have
agreed that the Keithley action should go forward. The Company
believes that the claims in both the Tren and Keithley actions
are without merit and intends to vigorously defend the cases.
In July 2005, the Company received a demand from David
Rosenblatt (Rosenblatt), the Companys former
General Counsel, seeking indemnification totaling approximately
$690,000 for expenses (including attorneys fees)
purportedly incurred by Rosenblatt in connection with the SEC
and DOJ investigations and certain civil actions filed against
Rosenblatt including indemnification of a settlement payment of
$195,000 Rosenblatt has agreed to make in connection with his
settlement of the claims brought against him in the Securities
Class Action Lawsuit. The Company had advanced expenses of
$506,000 as of December 31, 2005. The Company is unable to
determine what portion, if any, of Rosenblatts additional
expenses it will ultimately have to advance, or if Rosenblatt
will ultimately demonstrate an entitlement to indemnification
with respect to the claimed amounts. While there can be no
assurances, as a result of the Company settling its obligations
with Wolff and Tafeen, it currently anticipates that it will not
incur any future material expenses in connection with
obligations to indemnify its current and former officers and
directors.
In March 2004, three former shareholders of WyldFyre
Technologies, Inc. (WyldFyre), two of whom had
previously opted out of the settlement of the Securities
Class Action Lawsuit, filed a complaint in the Superior
Court of California, County of Los Angeles against the Company,
two of its former officers and Merrill Lynch & Co.,
Inc. In August 2005, plaintiffs filed a second amended
complaint. In the second amended complaint, two of the three
former shareholders allege claims against the Company for
vicarious liability for fraud allegedly committed by the
Companys former officers, unfair business practices,
unjust enrichment and breach of contract arising out of the
Companys acquisition of WyldFyre in March 2000. The
plaintiffs seek restitution, recissionary or compensatory
damages in an unspecified amount, disgorgement of benefits,
punitive damages and costs of litigation including
attorneys fees. The Company has filed an answer to the
second amended complaint. Except for certain limited discovery,
proceedings in this matter have been stayed on Motion of the DOJ
pending the resolution of certain federal criminal charges
asserted against Mr. Wolff and Mr. Tafeen, two former
officers of the Company who are co-defendants in this matter.
The Company intends to vigorously defend this action. At this
time, however, the Company is unable to express an opinion on
the outcome of this case.
In July 2004, the Company received a copy of an amended
complaint in (Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP v. AOL Time
Warner. et.al.) in which the Company was named as a
defendant. The case was originally filed in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
in July 2003 against Time Warner (formerly, AOL Time Warner),
current and former officers and directors of Time Warner and
America Online, Inc. (AOL), and Time Warners
outside auditor alleging that Time Warner and AOL made material
misrepresentations
and/or
omissions of material fact in connection with the business of
AOL both before and after the merger of AOL and Time Warner in
violation of federal securities laws and constituting common law
fraud and negligent misrepresentation. In adding the Company as
a defendant, the plaintiff, a Dutch pension fund, alleges that
the Company and four other third parties with whom AOL did
business and who are also named as defendants, aided and abetted
the alleged common
86
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
law fraud and themselves engaged in common law fraud as part of
a civil conspiracy. The allegations against the Company, which
are based on the factual allegations in the first amended
consolidated class action complaint and other filings in the
Companys Securities Class Action Lawsuit, are that
certain former officers of the Company knew of the alleged fraud
at AOL and knowingly participated in and substantially assisted
that alleged fraud by negotiating, structuring and participating
in numerous triangular round trip transactions with
AOL and others. The plaintiff seeks an unspecified amount of
compensatory and punitive damages. The Company intends to defend
vigorously against this suit. The Company has moved to dismiss
the claims against it in the amended complaint. Discovery has
not commenced as of the filing of this
Form 10-K.
The Company is unable to predict the outcome of this case or
reasonably estimate a range of possible loss.
In December 2005,
Civix-DDI,
LLC (Civix) filed suit against the NAR, Homestore,
Hotels.com, L.P. and Hotels.com GP LLC in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern
Division. The complaint alleges that Homestore and the other
defendants infringe U.S. Patent 6,385,622; 6,408,307;
6,415,291; and 6,473,692. The complaint alleges that Homestore
and the NAR infringe these patents by offering, providing, using
and operating location-based searching services through the
REALTOR.com®
web site and requests an unspecified amount of damages
(including treble damages for willful infringement and
attorneys fees) and an injunction. Yahoo! Inc. was added
as a defendant in the Amended Complaint which was filed by Civix
on January 11, 2006. Homestore is defending both itself and
the NAR. On January 26, 2006, Homestore and the NAR filed
their answer and counterclaims responding to Civixs
complaint denying that Homestore and the NAR infringed on these
patents and that these patents are invalid. Civix has replied to
the answer and counterclaims filed by Homestore and the NAR. The
Company is continuing its evaluation and investigation of the
allegations made in the lawsuit and intends to vigorously defend
against them.
As part of the sale in 2002 of the Companys ConsumerInfo
division to Experian Holdings, Inc. (Experian),
$10.0 million of the purchase price was put in escrow to
secure our indemnification obligations (the Indemnity
Escrow). The Indemnity Escrow was scheduled to terminate
in the third quarter of 2003, but prior to the scheduled
termination, Experian demanded indemnification from the Company
for claims made against Experian or its subsidiaries by several
parties and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC),
including allegations of unfair and deceptive advertising in
connection with ConsumerInfos furnishing of credit reports
and providing Advice for Improving Credit that
appeared on its web site both before, during, and after the
Companys ownership of ConsumerInfo. Under the stock
purchase agreement, pursuant to which the Company sold
ConsumerInfo to Experian, the Company could have elected to
defend against the claims, but because the alleged conduct
occurred both before and after its sale to Experian, the Company
elected to rely on Experian to defend it. Accordingly, the
Company has not made a complete evaluation of the underlying
claims, but rather receives periodic updates from Experian and
its counsel concerning their defense of the claims. The FTC
action against Experian has now been resolved by stipulated
judgment that requires, among other things, that refunds be made
available to certain customers who purchased ConsumerInfo
products during the period November 2000 through September 2003.
Experian is in the process of administering the settlement and
the Company is unable to estimate the amounts for which Experian
will seek indemnity from it at this time. Other civil actions
for which Experian demanded indemnification from the Company
continue. Because those cases are continuing, the amounts to be
paid by Experian arising from these actions for which Experian
will seek indemnity from the Company cannot be estimated. There
is no assurance that Experian will not seek to recover from the
Company an amount in excess of the Indemnity Escrow. Under the
terms of the stock purchase agreement, the Companys
maximum potential liability for the claims by Experian is capped
at $29.3 million less the balance in the Indemnity Escrow,
which was $7.5 million at December 31, 2005.
In June 2000, Anil K. Agarwal filed a petition for declaratory
judgment against the Company in the District Court of Douglas
County, Nebraska. The lawsuit arises from a transaction between
Dr. Agarwal and Michael K. Luther. Mr. Luther directed
InfoTouch Corporation (InfoTouch), the
Companys predecessor, to transfer certain shares of
InfoTouch Series B Preferred Stock to Dr. Agarwal.
Dr. Agarwal seeks substantial damages and a declaratory
judgment in connection with his claim that he should have been
issued shares of Series B Preferred
87
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
stock of InfoTouch sufficient to entitle him to receive certain
shares of common stock, and that there is a shortfall of
104,375 shares of common stock due and owing to him. The
Companys motion for summary judgment was granted and
Dr. Agarwals petition was dismissed with prejudice in
December 2004. Dr. Agarwal has appealed the dismissal to
the Nebraska State Court of Appeals. The Company intends to
vigorously defend against the appeal.
Contingencies
From time to time, the Company is party to various other
litigation and administrative proceedings relating to claims
arising from its operations in the ordinary course of business.
As of the date of this
Form 10-K
and except as set forth herein, the Company is not a party to
any other litigation or administrative proceedings that
management believes will have a material adverse effect on the
Companys business, results of operations, financial
condition or cash flows.
Stock
Plans
In January 2006, in accordance with plan provisions, the number
of shares reserved for issuance under the SIP was increased by
an additional 6,713,966 shares.
Acquisition
of Moving.com
On February 21, 2006, the Company acquired certain assets
and assumed certain liabilities of Moving.com, Inc. from TMP
Directional Marketing, LLC for approximately $9.0 million
in cash subject to certain post-closing adjustments. Moving.com
connects consumers with moving companies, van lines, truck
rental providers and self storage facilities.
88
HOMESTORE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
24.
|
Quarterly
Financial Data (unaudited)
|
Provided below is the selected unaudited quarterly financial
data for 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
56,456
|
|
|
$
|
63,253
|
|
|
$
|
66,338
|
|
|
$
|
66,575
|
|
|
$
|
53,424
|
|
|
$
|
54,320
|
|
|
$
|
54,782
|
|
|
$
|
54,334
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
43,555
|
|
|
|
49,714
|
|
|
|
52,437
|
|
|
|
50,728
|
|
|
|
40,174
|
|
|
|
41,853
|
|
|
|
42,127
|
|
|
|
41,877
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
|
|
3,320
|
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
(5,180
|
)
|
|
|
(4,777
|
)
|
|
|
(3,960
|
)
|
|
|
(4,753
|
)
|
|
|
(1,011
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
7,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
|
|
3,320
|
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
(4,325
|
)
|
|
|
(5,083
|
)
|
|
|
(4,262
|
)
|
|
|
(4,573
|
)
|
|
|
6,032
|
|
Convertible preferred stock dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) applicable to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(395
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,320
|
|
|
$
|
1,945
|
|
|
$
|
(4,636
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,083
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,262
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,573
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
applicable to common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
applicable to common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried
out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures pursuant to
Rule 13a-15
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we
file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms.
During the fourth quarter of 2005, we implemented certain
modules of PeopleSoft financials in conjunction with the second
phase of a company-wide enterprise resource planning initiative.
In connection therewith, we have updated our internal controls
over financial reporting as necessary to accommodate any
modifications to our internal processes and accounting
procedures, including the improvement and retention of
documentation of all accounting policies and procedures as well
as all of managements key assumptions, estimates and
conclusions that affect its recorded balances in its financial
statements.
90
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
The management of Homestore, Inc. (Homestore or the
Company) is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Homestores management assessed the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005. In making this assessment, the
Companys management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on our
assessment, management believes that, as of December 31,
2005, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Homestores independent registered public accounting firm
has issued an audit report on our assessment of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting. This
report appears below.
/s/ W. MICHAEL LONG
W. Michael Long
Chief Executive Officer
March 7, 2006
/s/ LEWIS R. BELOTE, III
Lewis R. Belote, III
Chief Financial Officer
March 7, 2006
91
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Homestore, Inc.
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal Control
over Financial Reporting appearing above, that Homestore, Inc.
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2005 based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (the COSO criteria). Homestore, Inc.s
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on managements
assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the
companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Homestore,
Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our
opinion, Homestore, Inc. maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Homestore, Inc. as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2005 and our report dated March 8, 2006
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 8, 2006
92
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None
PART III
Information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of
Part III is omitted from this Annual Report and will be
filed in a definitive proxy statement or by an amendment to this
Annual Report not later than 120 days after the end of the
fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors
and Executive Officers of the Registrant
|
We will provide information that is responsive to this item in
our definitive proxy statement or in an amendment to this Annual
Report not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal
year covered by this Annual Report, in either case under the
captions Management, Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance, Code of
Conduct and Business Ethics and possibly elsewhere
therein. That information is incorporated in this item by
reference.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
We will provide information that is responsive to this item in
our definitive proxy statement or in an amendment to this Annual
Report not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal
year covered by this Annual Report, in either case under the
caption Executive Compensation, and possibly
elsewhere therein. That information is incorporated in this item
by reference.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
We will provide information that is responsive to this item in
our definitive proxy statement or in an amendment to this Annual
Report not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal
year covered by this Annual Report, in either case under the
caption Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management, and possibly elsewhere therein. That
information is incorporated in this item by reference.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
We will provide information that is responsive to this item in
our definitive proxy statement or in an amendment to this Annual
Report not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal
year covered by this Annual Report, in either case under the
caption Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions, and possibly elsewhere therein. That
information is incorporated in this item by reference.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
We will provide information that is responsive to this item in
our definitive proxy statement or in an amendment to this Annual
Report not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal
year covered by this Annual Report, in either case under the
caption Principal Accountant Fees and Services, and
Fees Billed for Services Rendered by Independent
Auditors, and possibly elsewhere therein. That information
is incorporated in this item by reference.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this
report:
(1) Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data: See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements at
Item 8 on page 47 of this report.
93
(2) Schedule II Valuation and
Qualifying Accounts, Exhibit Number 99.01.
(3) Exhibits
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
2.01
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
December 31, 1998 between NetSelect, Inc. and InfoTouch
Corporation. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.01 to
our registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed May 28, 1999.)
|
2.02
|
|
Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization dated June 20, 1998 among NetSelect, Inc.,
National New Homes Co., Inc., MultiSearch Solutions, Inc., Fred
White, and R. Fred White III. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.02 to our registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed May 28, 1999.)
|
2.03
|
|
Exchange Agreement dated
March 31, 1998 among NetSelect, Inc., The Enterprise of
America, Ltd., and Roger Scommegna. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 2.03 to our registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed May 28, 1999.)
|
2.04
|
|
Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization dated May 19, 1999 between NetSelect, Inc.,
Avenue Acquisition Corporation and SpringStreet, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.04 to our
registration statement on
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed June 17, 1999.)
|
2.05
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated
October 12, 1999 among
Homestore.com®,
Inc., The Homebuyers Fair, Inc., certain shareholders of
The Homebuyers Fair, Inc., and Central Newspapers, Inc.,
as Shareholder Agent. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.01 to our current report on
Form 8-K
filed November 15, 1999.)
|
2.06
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated
October 12, 1999 among
Homestore.com®,
Inc., FAS-Hotline, Inc., the shareholders of FAS-Hotline, Inc.,
and Central Newspapers, Inc., as Shareholder Agent.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.02 to our current
report on
Form 8-K
filed November 15, 1999.)
|
2.07
|
|
Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization dated October 26, 2000 among
Homestore.com®,
Inc., Metal Acquisition Corp., WW Acquisition Corp., Move.com,
Inc., Welcome
Wagon®
International, Inc., Cendant Membership Services Holdings, Inc.
and Cendant Corporation. (Incorporated by reference to
Annex A to the definitive proxy statement filed
November 29, 2000.)
|
3.01.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation dated June 23, 2005.(2)
|
3.01.2
|
|
Certificate of Designation of
Series B Convertible Participating Preferred Stock dated
November 29, 2005.(2)
|
3.02
|
|
Bylaws dated June 22, 2005.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our current
report on
Form 8-K
filed June 28, 2005.)
|
3.03.1
|
|
RealSelect, Inc.s
Certificate of Incorporation dated October 25, 1996.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.05.1 to our
registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed May 28, 1999.)
|
3.03.2
|
|
RealSelect, Inc.s
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation dated
November 25, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.05.2 to our registration statement on
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed June 17, 1999.)
|
3.04
|
|
RealSelect, Inc.s Amended
By-laws dated December 1999. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.07 of our
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999 filed March 10,
2000.)
|
4.01
|
|
Form of Specimen Certificate for
common stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to
our registration statement on
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed July 8, 1999.)
|
4.02.1
|
|
NetSelect, Inc. Second Amended and
Restated Stockholders Agreement dated January 28, 1999.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.02.1 to our
registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed May 28, 1999.)
|
4.02.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to NetSelect,
Inc. Second Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement dated
April 9, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.02.2 to our registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed May 28, 1999.)
|
10.01.1
|
|
Operating Agreement dated
November 26, 1996, between
REALTORS®
Information Network, Inc. and RealSelect, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.02 to our registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed May 28, 1999.)
|
10.01.2
|
|
First Amendment to Operating
Agreement dated December 27, 1996 between
REALTORS®
Information Network, Inc. and RealSelect, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.02.2 to our registration statement
on
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed June 17, 1999.)
|
94
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
10.01.3
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Operating
Agreement dated May 28, 1999 between
REALTORS®
Information Network, Inc. and RealSelect, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.02.3 to our registration statement
on
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed June 17, 1999.)
|
10.02
|
|
Master Agreement dated
November 26, 1996, among NetSelect, Inc., NetSelect,
L.L.C., RealSelect, Inc., CDW Internet, L.L.C., Whitney Equity
Partners, L.P., Allen & Co., InfoTouch Corporation, and
REALTORS®
Information Network, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.03 to our registration statement on
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed June 17, 1999.)
|
10.03
|
|
Joint Ownership Agreement dated
November 26, 1996, among National Association of
REALTORS®,
NetSelect, L.L.C., and NetSelect, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.04 to our registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed May 28, 1999.)
|
10.04
|
|
Trademark License dated
November 26, 1996, between National Association of
REALTORS®
and RealSelect, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.05 to our registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed May 28, 1999.)
|
10.05
|
|
Agreement dated August 21,
1998 among RealSelect, Inc.,
REALTORS®
Information Network, Inc., National Association of
REALTORS®,
NetSelect, Inc., and NetSelect L.L.C. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.29 to our registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed May 28, 1999.)
|
10.06
|
|
Agreement dated May 28, 1999
among NetSelect, Inc., RealSelect, Inc.,
REALTORS®
Information Network, Inc. and National Association of
REALTORS®.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to our
registration statement on
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed June 17, 1999.)
|
10.07
|
|
Letter Agreement Regarding Rental
Site Acquisition dated May 17, 1999 among National
Association of
REALTORS®,
REALTORS®
Information Network, Inc. and RealSelect, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.32 to our registration statement on
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed June 17, 1999.)(1)
|
10.08
|
|
Stock and Interest Purchase
Agreement (NetSelect Series A and B Preferred) dated
November 26, 1996, among NetSelect, Inc., NetSelect L.L.C.,
and InfoTouch Corporation. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.06 to our registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed May 28, 1999.)
|
10.09
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated
March 16, 2002 between Experian Holdings, Inc. and
Homestore.com®,
Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our
Form 8-K
filed March 19, 2002.)
|
10.10
|
|
Distribution Agreement dated
January 9, 2003 between America Online, Inc. and Homestore,
Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to our
annual report on
Form 10-K
filed March 26, 2003.)(1)
|
10.11.1
|
|
Office Lease dated
September 18, 1998 between RealSelect, Inc. and WHLNF Real
Estate Limited Partnership for 225 West Hillcrest,
Suite 100, Thousand Oaks, California. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.24.1 to our registration statement
on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed May 28, 1999.)
|
10.11.2
|
|
First Amendment to Office Lease
dated March 31, 1999 between RealSelect, Inc. and WHLNF
Real Estate Limited Partnership for 225 West Hillcrest,
Suite 100, Thousand Oaks, California. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.24.2 to our registration statement
on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed May 28, 1999.)
|
10.12
|
|
Standard Office Lease Form,
Westlake North Business Park dated March 7, 2000 between
Westlake North Associates, LLC, and Homestore, Inc. for 30700
Russell Ranch Road, Westlake Village, California. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to our
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000 filed April 2,
2001.)
|
10.13
|
|
NetSelect, Inc. 1996 Stock
Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16
to our registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed May 28, 1999.)(3)
|
10.14
|
|
NetSelect, Inc. 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17
to our registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed May 28, 1999.)(3)
|
10.15
|
|
Homestore.com®,
Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.18 to our registration statement on
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed July 27, 1999.)(3)
|
10.16
|
|
Homestore.com®,
Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.19 to our registration statement on
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed July 27, 1999.)(3)
|
10.17
|
|
Homestore.com®,
Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.04 to our registration statement on
Form S-8
(File
No. 333-89172)
filed May 24, 2002.)(3)
|
95
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
10.18
|
|
InfoTouch Corporation 1994 Stock
Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20
to our registration statement on
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed June 17, 1999.)(3)
|
10.19
|
|
Move.com, Inc. 2000 Stock
Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.04
to our registration statement on
Form S-8
(File
No. 333-55828)
filed February 16, 2001.)(3)
|
10.20
|
|
Cendant Corporation Move.com Group
1999 Stock Option Plan as assumed by Cendant Corporation from
Move.com, Inc. and amended and restated effective as of
March 21, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.05 to our registration statement on
Form S-8
(File
No. 333-55828)
filed February 16, 2001.)(3)
|
10.21
|
|
1997 Stock Initiative Plan of
Cendant Corporation as amended and restated through
October 14, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.06 to our registration statement on
Form S-8
(File
No. 333-55828)
filed February 16, 2001.)(3)
|
10.22
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated
1997 Stock Incentive Plan of Cendant Corporation dated
March 27, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.07 to our registration statement on
Form S-8
(File
No. 333-55828)
filed February 16, 2001.)(3)
|
10.23
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated
1997 Stock Incentive Plan of Cendant Corporation dated
March 28, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.08 to our registration statement on
Form S-8
(File
No. 333-55828)
filed February 16, 2001.)(3)
|
10.24
|
|
Homestore 401(k) Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to our
registration statement on
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-79689)
filed June 17, 1999.)(3)
|
10.25
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement
between Homestore. Inc. and each of its directors and executive
officers (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to our
annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed March 15,
2004.)(3)
|
10.26
|
|
Employment Agreement dated
March 6, 2002 between
Homestore.com®,
Inc. and W. Michael Long. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 6.01(A) to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 filed May 14,
2002.)(3)
|
10.27
|
|
2003 Executive Bonus Plan of W.
Michael Long. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed
November 13, 2003.)(3)
|
10.28
|
|
2005 Executive Bonus Plan of W.
Michael Long. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed August 5,
2005.)(3)
|
10.29
|
|
Employment Agreement dated
March 6, 2002 between
Homestore.com®,
Inc. and Jack D. Dennison. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 6.03(A) to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 filed May 14,
2002.)(3)
|
10.30
|
|
2003 Executive Bonus Plan of Jack
D. Dennison. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed
November 13, 2003.)(3)
|
10.31
|
|
2005 Executive Bonus Plan of Jack
D. Dennison. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed August 5,
2005.)(3)
|
10.32
|
|
Employment Agreement dated
March 6, 2002 between
Homestore.com®,
Inc. and Lewis R. Belote III. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 6.02(A) to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 filed May 14,
2002.)(3)
|
10.33
|
|
2003 Executive Bonus Plan of Lewis
R. Belote III. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed
November 13, 2003.)(3)
|
10.34
|
|
2005 Executive Bonus Plan of Lewis
R. Belote III. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed August 5,
2005.)(3)
|
10.35
|
|
Executive Retention and Severance
Agreement dated April 24, 2002 between
Homestore.com®,
Inc. and Allan P. Merrill. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 6.06(A) to our
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 filed May 14,
2002.)(3)
|
10.36
|
|
Memorandum dated March 29,
2002 to Allan P. Merrill. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 6.07(A) to our
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 filed May 14,
2002.)(3)
|
10.37
|
|
2003 Executive Bonus Plan of Allan
P. Merrill. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to
our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed
November 31, 2003.)(3)
|
96
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
10.38
|
|
2005 Executive Bonus Plan of Allan
P. Merrill. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to
our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed August 5,
2005.)(3)
|
10.39
|
|
Executive Retention and Severance
Agreement dated September 30, 2002 between
Homestore.com®,
Inc. and Allan D. Dalton. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 filed
November 14, 2002.)(3)
|
10.40
|
|
Offer Letter dated October 7,
2002 between
Homestore.com®,
Inc. and Allan D. Dalton. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 filed
November 14, 2002.)(3)
|
10.41
|
|
2003 Executive Bonus Plan of Allan
D. Dalton. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed
November 13, 2003.)(3)
|
10.42
|
|
Realtor + Top Producer 2005
Executive Bonus Plan of Allan D. Dalton. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed August 5,
2005.)(3)
|
10.43
|
|
Executive Retention and Severance
Agreement dated September 30, 2002 between
Homestore.com®,
Inc. and Michael Douglas. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 filed
November 14, 2002.)(3)
|
10.44
|
|
Offer Letter dated
September 30, 2002 between
Homestore.com®,
Inc. and Michael R. Douglas. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 filed
November 14, 2002.)(3)
|
10.45
|
|
2003 Executive Bonus Plan of
Michael R. Douglas (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed
November 13, 2003.)(3)
|
10.46
|
|
2005 Executive Bonus Plan of
Michael R. Douglas (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed August 5,
2005.)(3)
|
10.47
|
|
Stipulation and Agreement of
Settlement between California State Teachers Retirement
System and Homestore, Inc. dated as of August 12, 2003.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed
November 13, 2003.)
|
10.48
|
|
Settlement Agreement and Release
dated August 5, 2003 among Homestore, Inc., Welcome
Wagon®
International, Inc., Cendant Corporation, Cendant Membership
Services Holdings, Inc, Century 21 Real Estate Corporation,
Coldwell Banker Real Estate Corporation, ERA Franchise Systems,
Inc., NRT Incorporated, and Cendant Mortgage Corporation.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed August 14,
2003.)
|
10.49
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement
dated August 5, 2003 among Homestore, Inc., Cendant
Corporation and Cendant Membership Services Holdings, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed August 14,
2003.)
|
10.50
|
|
Listings License Agreement dated
August 5, 2003 between Cendant Corporation and Homestore,
Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our
quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed August 14,
2003.)
|
10.51
|
|
Source Code License and
Maintenance Services Agreement dated August 5, 2003 between
Homestore, Inc. and Cendant Corporation. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed August 14,
2003.)
|
10.52
|
|
Option Agreement dated
August 5, 2003 between Cendant Membership Services
Holdings, Inc. and Homestore, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed August 14,
2003.)
|
10.53.1
|
|
Distribution Agreement dated
June 30, 2004 between America Online, Inc. and Homestore,
Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our
quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 filed August 4,
2004.)
|
10.53.2
|
|
Amendment to Distribution
Agreement dated as of October 29, 2005 between Registrant
and America Online, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 filed
November 9, 2005.)(4)
|
97
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
10.54
|
|
Contract of Sale dated as of April
2004 between 115 south Service Road, LLC and Welcome
Wagon®
International, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 filed August 4,
2004.)
|
10.55
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated
October 6, 2004 between Homestore, Inc. and Wyld
Acquisition Corp. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 filed
November 5, 2004.)
|
10.56
|
|
Master Distribution Agreement
dated February 2, 2005 among Homestore, Inc., Homestore
Sales Company, Inc. and NRT Incorporated.(2) (4)
|
10.57
|
|
Exclusivity Termination Agreement
between Homestore, Inc., RealSelect, Inc.,
REALTORS®
Information Network, Inc. and the National Association of
REALTORS®
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our current
report on
Form 8-K
filed April 21, 2005.)
|
10.58
|
|
Form of Certificate of Stock
Option Grant to Executive Officers (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 filed May 6,
2005.)(3)
|
10.59
|
|
Settlement Agreement and Releases
dated September 20, 2005 between the Company and Wolff
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our current
report on
Form 8-K
filed September 26, 2005.)
|
10.60
|
|
Preferred Stock Purchase
Agreement, dated November 6, 2005, by and among Homestore,
Inc. and the Purchasers signatory thereto (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our current report on
Form 8-K
filed November 7, 2005.)
|
10.61
|
|
Stockholders Agreement, dated
November 29, 2005, by and among Homestore, Inc., Elevation
Partners, L.P. and Elevation Employee Side Fund, LLC.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our current
report on
Form 8-K
filed November 30, 2005.)
|
14.01
|
|
Homestore, Inc. Code of Conduct
and Business Ethics. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 14.1 to our current report on
Form 8-K
filed March 21, 2005.)
|
21.01
|
|
Subsidiaries of Homestore, Inc.(2)
|
23.01
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young
LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.(2)
|
24.01
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on
signature pages to this report).(2)
|
31.01
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.(2)
|
31.02
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.(2)
|
32.01
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.(2)
|
32.02
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.(2)
|
99.01
|
|
Schedule II Valuation
and Qualifying Accounts.(2)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain
information in these exhibits pursuant to a confidential
treatment request. |
|
(2) |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
(3) |
|
Denotes management contracts and compensatory plans and
arrangements. |
|
(4) |
|
Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to
certain information in these exhibits pursuant to a confidential
treatment request. |
(c) Exhibits
See Item 15(a)(3) above.
98
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
HOMESTORE, INC.
W. Michael Long
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ LEWIS
R. BELOTE, III
|
Lewis R. Belote, III
Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 7, 2006
POWER OF
ATTORNEY
KNOW BY ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints jointly and
severally, Lewis R. Belote, III and Michael R. Douglas, and each
one of them, his
attorneys-in-fact,
each with the power of substitution, for him in any all
capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents
in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each said
attorneys-in-fact,
or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
Principal Executive
Officer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ W.
MICHAEL LONG
W.
Michael Long
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and
Director
|
|
March 7, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ LEWIS
R. BELOTE, III
Lewis
R. Belote, III
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
March 7, 2006
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOE
F. HANAUER
Joe
F. Hanauer
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Director
|
|
March 7, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ FRED
D. ANDERSON
Fred
D. Anderson
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ L.
JOHN DOERR
L.
John Doerr
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ WILLIAM
E. KELVIE
William
E. Kelvie
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ KENNETH
K. KLEIN
Kenneth
K. Klein
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROGER
B. MCNAMEE
Roger
B. McNamee
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ V.
PAUL UNRUH
V.
Paul Unruh
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ BRUCE
G. WILLISON
Bruce
G. Willison
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ALAN
J. YASSKY
Alan
J. Yassky
|
|
Director
|
|
March 7, 2006
|
100