e20vf
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
|
|
|
o |
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-29620
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Date of event requiring this shell company report
LJ INTERNATIONAL INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
LJ INTERNATIONAL INC.
(Translation of Registrants name into English)
British Virgin Islands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Unit #12, 12/F, Block A
Focal Industrial Centre
21 Man Lok Street
Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
(Address of principal executive offices)
Hon Tak Ringo NG, CFO
011-852-2764-3622 (telephone)
ringong@ljintl.com (email)
011-852-2764-3783 (facsimile)
Unit #12, 12/F, Block A
Focal Industrial Centre
21 Man Lok Street
Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
|
|
|
Title of each
class
|
|
Name of each exchange
on which registered |
|
|
|
$.01 Par Value Common Stock
(Common Stock)
|
|
NASDAQ |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common
stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
21,437,172 Shares of Common Stock as of December 31, 2007
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not
required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial
statements included in this filing:
þ |
|
U.S. GAAP |
|
o |
|
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by |
|
|
the International Accounting Standards Board |
|
o |
|
Other |
If Other has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which
financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ |
(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be
filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the
distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Not Applicable.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
These include statements about our expectations, plans, objectives, assumptions or future events.
In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as anticipate,
estimate, plans, potential, projects, continuing, ongoing, expects, management
believes, we believe, we intend and similar expressions. These statements involve estimates,
assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed for the reasons described in this annual report. You should not place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements.
You should be aware that our actual results could differ materially from those contained in
the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, such as but not limited to:
|
|
|
dependence upon certain customers |
|
|
|
|
dependence on key personnel |
|
|
|
|
control by principal shareholder |
|
|
|
|
competitive factors |
|
|
|
|
the operation of our business |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions |
You should also consider carefully the statements under Risk Factors and other sections of
this annual report, which address additional factors that could cause our actual results to differ
from those set forth in the forward-looking statements and could materially and adversely affect
our business, operating results and financial condition. All subsequent written and oral
forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly
qualified in their entirety by the applicable cautionary statements.
The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and, except
to the extent required by federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update any
forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement
is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. In addition, we cannot assess the
impact of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors,
may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking
statements.
We may use data and industry forecasts in this annual report which we have obtained from
internal surveys, market research, publicly available information and industry publications.
Industry publications generally state that the information they provide has been obtained from
sources believed to be reliable but that the accuracy and completeness of such information is not
guaranteed. Similarly, we believe that the surveys and market research we or others have performed
are reliable, but we have not independently verified this information.
-2-
PART I
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
A. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(US Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following selected consolidated financial data with respect to the five-year period ended
December 31, 2007 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The
following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes included
elsewhere in this annual report.
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
Statement of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
152,037 |
|
|
|
123,791 |
|
|
|
99,646 |
|
|
|
77,504 |
|
|
|
58,330 |
|
Cost of Goods sold |
|
|
(112,508 |
) |
|
|
(88,867 |
) |
|
|
(77,127 |
) |
|
|
(61,265 |
) |
|
|
(44,947 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
39,529 |
|
|
|
34,924 |
|
|
|
22,519 |
|
|
|
16,239 |
|
|
|
13,383 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
(30,399 |
) |
|
|
(23,114 |
) |
|
|
(15,488 |
) |
|
|
(11,578 |
) |
|
|
(9,133 |
) |
Net (loss) gain on derivatives |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
(3,095 |
) |
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(1,368 |
) |
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
|
|
(1,184 |
) |
Impairment on property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
Amortization
and impairment loss on goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(698 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
6,031 |
|
|
|
9,742 |
|
|
|
5,671 |
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
2,869 |
|
Other income and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Interest expenses |
|
|
(3,103 |
) |
|
|
(3,258 |
) |
|
|
(1,991 |
) |
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
(753 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income before income taxes,
minority interests, equity in results of
investment securities and extraordinary item |
|
|
3,201 |
|
|
|
6,766 |
|
|
|
3,819 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
2,157 |
|
Income taxes expense |
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
|
(1,403 |
) |
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(352 |
) |
Income before minority interests, equity in
results of investment securities and
extraordinary item |
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
5,363 |
|
|
|
3,080 |
|
|
|
1,989 |
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Income before equity in results of investment
securities and extraordinary item |
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
1,989 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
Equity in results of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(851 |
) |
Income before extraordinary item |
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
Extraordinary gain on negative goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
|
|
4,351 |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
21,064 |
|
|
|
17,390 |
|
|
|
13,439 |
|
|
|
11,119 |
|
|
|
8,757 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
22,289 |
|
|
|
18,303 |
|
|
|
14,322 |
|
|
|
12,107 |
|
|
|
9,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
|
62,786 |
|
|
|
50,134 |
|
|
|
35,554 |
|
|
|
23,617 |
|
|
|
17,053 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
134,144 |
|
|
|
124,522 |
|
|
|
108,230 |
|
|
|
73,673 |
|
|
|
59,885 |
|
Long-term obligation |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
72,668 |
|
|
|
59,739 |
|
|
|
45,008 |
|
|
|
32,790 |
|
|
|
27,101 |
|
Pursuant to the purchase agreement dated January 1, 2005, the Company paid $2,827,500 for new
issuance of 3,900 shares of common stock of Goldleaves International Limited (GIL), in which the
Company had 20% equity interests and was classified as investment security as of December 31, 2004.
The Company then became the major stockholder holding 98% equity
-3-
interests in GIL, which became a subsidiary of the Company. As of December 31, 2004, this
investment was accounted for using the cost method. As appropriate for a step-acquisition, in the
2005 financial statements, the investment has been restated to account for under the equity method.
B. CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS.
Not applicable.
C. REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
Not applicable.
D. RISK FACTORS.
We depend upon one customer who accounts for at least 10% of our sales. We cannot be certain that
these sales will continue; if they do not, our revenues will likely decline.
Although we sell to a large number of customers in a variety of markets, one of our customers
accounts for at least 10% of our sales. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007,
this customer accounted for approximately 8% of our 2006 sales and 10% of our 2007 sales. This
customer is a non-affiliated third party and is not a related party of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries. Although we have maintained a good and longstanding relationship with this customer,
we do not have any long-term contract with it and it orders only on a purchase order basis. The
loss of this customer or a significant reduction in its orders would have a materially adverse
effect on our revenues.
We face significant competition from larger competitors in our wholesale and retail operations.
The making and distribution of jewelry is a highly competitive industry characterized by the
diversity and sophistication of the product. We compete with major domestic and international
companies with substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources and personnel
than us. There can be no assurance that other jewelry makers will not similarly develop low-cost,
high-volume production capability or an even better process, providing greater competition for us
and materially affecting our business prospects.
-4-
There are numerous factors relating to the operations of our business that could adversely affect
our success and results.
As a maker and merchandiser of low-cost, high-quality gem-set jewelry, our existing and future
operations are and will be influenced by several factors, including:
|
|
|
technological developments in the mass production of jewelry; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to meet the design and production requirements of our customers
efficiently; |
|
|
|
|
the market acceptance of our and our customers jewelry; |
|
|
|
|
increases in expenses associated with continued sales growth; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to control costs; |
|
|
|
|
our managements ability to evaluate the publics taste and new orders to target
satisfactory profit margins; |
|
|
|
|
our capacity to develop and manage the introduction of new designed products; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to compete. |
Quality control is also essential to our operations since customers demand compliance with
design and product specifications and consistency of production. We cannot assure that revenue
growth will occur on a quarterly or annual basis.
Our production facilities are located in China. Our results of operations and financial condition
may, therefore, be influenced by the economic, political, legal and social conditions in China.
Since 1978, the Chinese government has been reforming, and is expected to continue to reform,
Chinas economic and political systems. Such reforms have resulted in significant social progress.
Other political, economic and social factors could also lead to further readjustment of the reform
measures. This refinement and readjustment process may not always have a positive effect on our
operations in China. At times, we may also be adversely affected by changes in policies of the
Chinese government such as changes in laws and regulations or their interpretation, the
introduction of additional measures to control inflation, changes in the rate or method of taxation
and imposition of additional restrictions on currency conversion and remittances abroad.
Changes to PRC tax laws may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations in
the future.
The National Peoples Congress, the Chinese legislature, on March 16, 2007 passed a new
enterprise income tax law, which became effective on January 1, 2008. The new law applies a uniform
25% enterprise income tax rate (EIT) to both foreign invested enterprises and domestic
enterprises, except that enterprises that were approved to be established prior to March 16, 2007
may continue to enjoy the existing preferential tax treatments until December 31, 2012. Existing
companies are required to transition to the new EIT rate over a five-year period starting
January 1, 2008.
-5-
Under the New EIT Law, an enterprise established outside of China with de facto management
bodies within China is considered a resident enterprise, meaning that it can be treated in a
manner similar to a Chinese enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes. The implementing rules
of the New EIT Law define de facto management as substantial and overall management and control
over the production and operations, personnel, accounting, and properties of the enterprise.
Currently no official interpretation or application of this new resident enterprise
classification is available, therefore it is unclear how tax authorities will determine tax
residency based on the facts of each case.
If the PRC tax authorities determine that our British Virgin Islands holding company is a
resident enterprise for PRC enterprise income tax purposes, a number of unfavorable PRC tax
consequences could follow. First, we may be subject to enterprise income tax at a rate of 25% on
our worldwide taxable income as well as PRC enterprise income tax reporting obligations. In our
case, this would mean that non-China source income would be subject to PRC enterprise income tax at
a rate of 25%, in comparison to no taxation in the British Virgin Islands. Second, although under
the New EIT Law and its implementing rules dividends paid to us from our PRC subsidiaries would
qualify as tax-exempt income, we cannot guarantee that such dividends will not be subject to a
10% withholding tax, as the PRC foreign exchange control authorities, which enforce the withholding
tax, have not yet issued guidance with respect to the processing of outbound remittances to
entities that are treated as resident enterprises for PRC enterprise income tax purposes. Finally,
if our British Virgin Islands holding company is deemed to be a PRC tax resident enterprise, a 10%
withholding tax shall be imposed on dividends we pay to our non-PRC shareholders and with respect
to gains derived from our non-PRC shareholders transferring our shares
Our products are currently made at our production facility located in Shenzhen, China. However,
our insurance may not adequately cover any losses due to fire, casualty or theft.
We have obtained fire, casualty and theft insurance covering several of our stock in trade,
goods and merchandise, furniture and equipment and production facility in China. The proceeds of
such insurance may not be sufficient to cover material damage to, or the loss of, our production
facility due to fire, severe weather, flood or other cause, and such damage or loss would have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition, business and prospects. Consistent with the
customary practice among enterprises in China and due to the cost in relation to the benefit, we do
not carry any business interruption insurance in China.
Sales of our jewelry to retailers are generally stronger during the quarter ending December 31 of
each year due to the importance of the holiday selling season.
The approximately 34% of our wholesale sales during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 to
our TV shopping channel customers was not seasonal in nature. It has been our managements
experience that the remaining 66% of our total wholesale sales is seasonally sensitive and is
greater during the quarter ending December 31 of each year.
-6-
The success of our retail store expansion program in China is dependent upon numerous factors over
which we have limited control.
The future success of our ENZO retail stores in China is partially dependent upon general
economic conditions in China, competitive developments within the retail jewelry sector in China
and consumer attitudes, including changes in consumer preferences for certain jewelry styles and
materials. In addition, our retail expansion program is also dependent upon a number of factors
relating to our stores, including the availability of property, the location of the mall or
shopping centre, the availability of desirable locations within a mall, the terms of leases, our
relationship with major landlords, and the design and maintenance of our stores.
We rely on short-term financing from banks for our daily operation.
We rely on short-term borrowings as part of our financing needs. If we fail to achieve timely
rollover, extension or refinancing of our short-term debt, we may be unable to meet our obligations
in connection with debt service, accounts payable and/or other liabilities when they become due and
payable. In addition, we may be exposed to changes in interest rates. If interest rates increase
substantially, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
Certain of our banking facilities that offer short-term borrowings are collateralized by
properties owned by Yu Chuan Yih and by his personal guarantee. If Mr. Yih withdraws the properties
or his personal guarantee, the banking facilities may no longer remain available for use by us. In
that event, our daily operations may be adversely affected.
We rely geographically on the US market for the majority of our revenue.
Our wholesale business is our major revenue contributor and accounts for 77% of our total
revenue. Geographically, North America is a major market for our wholesale business and contributes
68% of our revenues. Accordingly, the revenue of our wholesale business in the US market accounts
for 53% of our total revenue. Any substantial decline of the US economy may adversely affect the
spending patterns of the US consumers which could, in turn, adversely affect our revenue and income
from the region.
Our holding company structure creates restrictions on the payment of dividends.
We have no direct business operations, other than the ownership of our subsidiaries, of which
we have control over their operation policies including, among others, payment of dividend. While
we have no current intention of paying dividends, should we, as a holding company, decide in the
future to do so, our ability to pay dividends and meet other obligations depends upon the receipt
of dividends or other payments from our operating subsidiaries and other holdings and investments.
In addition, our operating subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on their ability to make
distributions to us, including as a result of restrictive covenants and minimum net worth
requirements in loan agreements, restrictions on the conversion of local currency into US dollars
or other hard currency and other regulatory restrictions.
-7-
As a foreign private issuer, we are not subject to certain rules promulgated by Nasdaq that other
Nasdaq-listed issuers are required to comply with.
Our common shares are currently listed on The Nasdaq Global Market and, for so long as our
securities continue to be listed, we will remain subject to the rules and regulations established
by Nasdaq applicable to listed companies. As permitted under Nasdaq rules applicable to foreign
private issuers, we have determined not to comply with the following Nasdaq rules:
|
|
|
our independent directors do not hold regularly scheduled meetings in executive
session; |
|
|
|
|
the compensation of our executive officers is not determined by an independent
committee of the board or by the independent members of the board of directors, and our
CEO may be present and participate in the deliberations concerning his compensation; |
|
|
|
|
related party transactions are not required to be reviewed or approved by our audit
committee or other independent body of the board of directors; and |
|
|
|
|
we are not required to solicit shareholder approval of stock plans, including those
in which our officers or directors may participate; stock issuances that will result in
a change in control; the issuance of our stock in related party transactions or other
transactions in which we may issue 20% or more of our outstanding shares; or, below
market issuances of 20% or more of our outstanding shares to any person. |
We may in the future determine to voluntarily comply with one or more of the foregoing provisions.
It may be difficult to serve us with legal process or enforce judgments against us or our
management.
We are a British Virgin Islands holding company, and substantially all of our assets are
located in China and Hong Kong. In addition, all but one of our directors and officers are
non-residents of the United States, and all or substantial portions of the assets of such
non-residents are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible to effect
service of process within the United States upon such persons. Moreover, there is doubt as to
whether the courts of the British Virgin Islands, China or Hong Kong would enforce:
|
|
|
judgments of United States courts against us, our directors or our officers based on
the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any
state; or |
|
|
|
|
in original actions brought in the British Virgin Islands, China or Hong Kong,
liabilities against us or non-residents based upon the securities laws of the United
States or any state. |
-8-
Some information about us may be unavailable due to exemptions under the Exchange Act for a foreign
private issuer.
We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules under the Exchange Act. As
such, we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to United States domestic public companies,
including:
|
|
|
the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or current reports on Form 8-K; |
|
|
|
|
the provisions of Regulation FD aimed at preventing issuers from making selective
disclosures of material information; |
|
|
|
|
the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or
authorizations applicable to a security registered under the Exchange Act; and |
|
|
|
|
the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their
stock ownership and trading activities and establishing insider liability for profits
realized from any short-swing trading transaction. |
Because of these exemptions, investors are not provided with the same information which is
generally available about domestic public companies organized in the United States.
Since we are a British Virgin Islands company, the rights of our shareholders may be more limited
than those of shareholders of a company organized in the United States.
Under the laws of most jurisdictions in the United States, majority and controlling
shareholders generally have certain fiduciary responsibilities to the minority shareholders.
Shareholder action must be taken in good faith, and actions by controlling shareholders which are
obviously unreasonable may be declared null and void. British Virgin Islands law protecting the
interests of minority shareholders may not be as protective in all circumstances as the law
protecting minority shareholders in US jurisdictions. In addition, the circumstances in which a
shareholder of a BVI company may sue the company derivatively, and the procedures and defenses that
may be available to the company, may result in the rights of shareholders of a BVI company being
more limited than those of shareholders of a company organized in the US.
Furthermore, our directors have the power to take certain actions without shareholder approval
which would require shareholder approval under the laws of most US jurisdictions. The directors of
a BVI corporation, subject in certain cases to court approval but without shareholder approval, may
implement a reorganization, merger or consolidation, the sale of any assets, property, part of the
business, or securities of the corporation. Our ability to amend our Memorandum of Association and
Articles of Association without shareholder approval could have the effect of delaying, deterring
or preventing a change in our control without any further action by the shareholders, including a
tender offer to purchase our common stock at a premium over then current market prices.
-9-
Legal proceedings related to our historical reporting of financial results and other issues may
significantly harm our business.
Several lawsuits have been filed against us and certain officers and members of the Board of
Directors, alleging false representations and material omissions in connection with press releases,
SEC filings and other statements that purportedly overstated the Companys business prospects and
financial results. These lawsuits are described more fully in Part I, Item 8 and in Part I, Item
18, Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements contained in this Form 20-F. Defending these
lawsuits has and will continue to result in significant expenditures and the diversion of our
managements time and attention from the operation of our business, which could have a negative
effect on our business operations. From time to time, we may become involved in other litigation or
other proceedings. Matters arising out of or related to the outcome of litigation could possibly
harm our future results of operations or financial condition due to expenses we may incur to defend
ourselves or the ramifications of an adverse decision.
-10-
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
A. HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY.
LJ International Inc. (we or the Company) was incorporated as an international business
company under the International Business Companies Act of the British Virgin Islands on January 30,
1997. As of December 31, 2007, we owned all of the issued share capital in the following
significant subsidiaries except Goldleaves Gems (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.:
|
|
|
Lorenzo Jewelry Limited (Lorenzo Jewelry), a company incorporated in Hong Kong on
February 20, 1987 |
|
|
|
|
Lorenzo Jewellery (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
Lorenzo (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
Goldleaves Gems (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (98% equity ownership) |
Our principal place of business and our executive office is located at Unit #12, 12/F, Block
A, Focal Industrial Centre, 21 Man Lok Street, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, telephone: (011)
852-2764-3622. We have designated CT Corporation, 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10011 as
our agent for service of process in the United States.
During our last three fiscal years, we have made the following significant capital
expenditures:
|
|
|
we invested $670,000 for the purchase of 1,639 square meters of production space in
our Shenzhen, China facility during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
we acquired an additional 78% of the equity of Goldleaves International Limited for
$2,827,500 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
we spent $1,105,000 on capital expenditures, excluding inventory, for ENZO retail
store openings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
we spent $1,977,000 on capital expenditures, excluding inventory, for ENZO retail
store openings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 |
B. BUSINESS OVERVIEW.
We are a vertically integrated company that designs, brands, markets, distributes and retails
a complete range of fine jewelry. While we specialize in the colored jewelry segment, we also
offer high-end pieces set in yellow gold, white gold, platinum or sterling silver and adorned with
colored stones, diamonds, pearls and precious stones. We distribute to fine jewelers, department
stores, national jewelry chains and electronic and specialty retailers throughout North America and
Western Europe; and we conduct our jewelry retail business through the ENZO brand in the Asia
Pacific region, with the primary focus in the PRC market, which we regard as having one of the
largest and fastest growing consumer demands for luxury items. Our
-11-
product lines incorporate all major categories sought by major retailers, including earrings, necklaces,
pendants, rings and bracelets.
We believe that our vertically integrated structure provides significant advantages over our
competitors. All profits from value added processes are captured internally, rather than shared
with third party manufacturers. This results in very competitive pricing for the retailer and
enhanced profits for us. Innovative processes in stone cutting and production further enhance our
competitive position.
We employ an international design team and all of our designs and merchandising strategies are
proprietary. The exclusive and innovative concepts that we create offer brand potential. Our
primary marketing focus has been in North America where we have sold directly to certain high
volume customers that need specialized product development services, and through a marketing
relationship with International Jewelry Connection for those customers that need higher levels of
service and training.
We organize our marketing and distribution strategies by retail distribution channels.
Concepts are developed for the specific needs of different market segments. We have identified the
following as prime retail targets:
|
|
|
fine jewelers; |
|
|
|
|
national jewelry chains; |
|
|
|
|
department stores; |
|
|
|
|
TV shopping channels; and |
|
|
|
|
discount chain stores. |
For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, approximately 62% and 53% of our sales were in
North America.
In addition to our wholesale line of business involving direct sales to retailers, we have
expanded into the retail sales line of business involving direct sales to consumers in China
through company-owned retail stores under the brand name ENZO. In March 2004, we opened our first
retail store in Hong Kong and opened our flagship store in Shanghai in November 2004. As of June 11, 2008, we currently operate 98 ENZO retail stores across Hong Kong, China and Macau.
-12-
The following is a breakdown of our total revenues by geographic market for each of our past
three financial years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
US$ |
|
US$ |
|
US$ |
US & Canada |
|
|
80,572 |
|
|
|
76,889 |
|
|
|
67,780 |
|
Europe and other countries |
|
|
32,597 |
|
|
|
24,452 |
|
|
|
20,527 |
|
Japan |
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
3,686 |
|
PRC (including Hong Kong and Macau) |
|
|
36,662 |
|
|
|
19,996 |
|
|
|
7,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,037 |
|
|
|
123,791 |
|
|
|
99,646 |
|
|
|
|
Our Industry
The US jewelry industry is a highly fragmented $45 billion market, with no single entity
having more than 6% market share. The industry consists primarily of three retail sectors:
|
|
|
specialty retailers account for $27 billion in sales |
|
|
|
|
mass merchants and department stores account for $12 billion in sales |
|
|
|
|
direct avenues (television shopping, e-commerce, catalogs) account for $6 billion |
The US jewelry industry is comprised of two major groups that distribute finished jewelry to
retailers in the United States:
|
|
|
a small number of producers that make and distribute their own jewelry directly to
retailers; and |
|
|
|
|
a large number of wholesalers and distributors who purchase products or portions of
products from third parties and resell those items to retailers. |
We believe that vertically integrated companies that control costs by performing all value
added processes enjoy a distinct competitive advantage over wholesalers and distributors who pay
premium acquisition prices for items that they intend to resell. We further believe that large
retailers want to rely upon prime producers because they believe that prime producers are reliable
and low cost producers who can accommodate the large quantities of production that large retailers
commonly purchase.
The Chinese jewelry industry has experienced rapid development due to a series of major
reforms, including the liberalization of Chinas gold market, the lowering of tariff rates, and the
decision of the Chinese Government to open up the retail sector to international companies.
In addition, rising income levels coupled with the growing urban population in China have
helped the jewelry market record double-digit growth annually. The continuing
-13-
acceleration of the urbanization trend in China will likely result in improved income levels,
thereby increasing private consumption. The Chinese Government has also encouraged consumer
spending by instituting longer national holidays and increasing the salary of civil servants.
Management believes that China is the largest consumer of platinum and jade in the world for
the past three years, the largest consumer of diamonds in Asia, and the second largest consumer of
gold in the world.
Our Business Strategy
Our business strategy is to:
|
|
|
increase our market share of moderately priced high-quality gem-set colored and
precious jewelry by capitalizing on our vertically integrated production processes to
produce diamond and high-end precious stone jewelry in addition to high volume,
high-quality colored products; |
|
|
|
|
further develop our existing customer relationships with our specialized services;
and |
|
|
|
|
expand aggressively into new distribution channels, particularly in the United
States, China, Western Europe, Japan, Russia and the Middle East. |
We are aggressively developing new product lines in exotic stones, which have high perceived
values among colored stones. We continue to expand into new product categories by:
|
|
|
marketing a line of sterling silver jewelry. These are typically merchandised with
a retail price range of $30 to $150; |
|
|
|
|
adding more lines into our LORENZO branded products with a retail price range of
$199 to $999; and |
|
|
|
|
offering diamond jewelry and expanding this business to our current client base by
adding diamonds to some of our settings, as well as offering newly designed jewelry. |
Our China Retail Sales Strategy
In 2004, we initiated a retail sales strategy aimed at gaining market share in the rapidly
growing consumer market in China. We opened three ENZO stores, two in China (including a flagship
store in Shanghai) and one in Hong Kong. We believe that China represents an excellent retail sales
opportunity for several reasons:
|
|
|
significant retail market Chinas retail sales exceed $600 billion annually,
making China the third largest market in the world. |
|
|
|
|
large and growing jewelry market we estimate that Chinas jewelry sales totaled
nearly $17 billion in 2006 and $26 billion in 2007. |
|
|
|
|
large pool of consumers China has a population of more than 1.3 billion people.
We estimate that roughly 160 million Chinese have enough income to purchase luxury
goods. |
-14-
|
|
|
favorable regulatory changes as a member of the World Trade Organization, China is
eliminating many restrictions on foreign ownership and operation of retail stores.
Tariffs on colored gemstones, gold, silver and pearls have been sharply reduced, and
economic and trade relationships between China and Hong Kong have been liberalized. |
|
|
|
|
changing consumer preferences Chinese consumers are no longer purchasing jewelry
solely as an investment. More Chinese consumers are embracing a more Western view of
jewelry as a fashion accessory and now demand more contemporary, colorful designs. |
We are expanding into China by means of Company-owned and -operated retail stores and supplier
relationships with leading retailers, such as Carrefour.
We intend to implement our business strategy by:
|
|
|
expanding our retail jewelry market in China by planning to open additional ENZO
stores in China during 2008 |
|
|
|
|
promoting visits with customers to coordinate and cater to their particular
promotional sales needs and monitoring their on-hand inventory in order to promote more
active sell-through |
|
|
|
|
expanding our distribution channels and further developing business with retail
jewelry chains in the US. |
Our Production Capability
We have established a sophisticated facility in China that performs stone cutting and
polishing and jewelry production. The facility is located in the city of Shenzhen in Guangdong
Province, China. Our production facility in Shenzhen has been operating for nine years and has
more than 14,000 square meters of production space. We currently employ approximately 3,000
skilled gemstone cutters and production personnel and turned out approximately two million pieces
of finished fine jewelry during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
We purchase imported choice gemstone material, which are from mines located in Africa, China
and South America, especially those concentrated in Brazil. We source our diamonds mainly from
suppliers in India and Africa. Gemstone craftsmen are trained to ensure that the highest levels of
cutting and polishing quality are achieved. The professional skills possessed by our cutters are
applied to a wide variety of shapes and sizes, maximizing the yield and value of the gemstone
material that we purchase. By performing internally the value-added processes of cutting and
polishing our colored gemstones, we maximize quality control and improve our profitability. We
specialize in a wide range of popular and exotic colored gemstones ranging from amethyst,
aquamarine and peridot to tanzanite and tourmaline.
-15-
Sales and Marketing
Wholesale
Our merchandising strategy is to provide unique and differentiated products that are enhanced
by the favorable pricing that results from our vertically integrated structure. We invest
significant effort in design and model making to produce items which are distinctly different from
those of our competitors. We continue to devote our efforts towards brand development and utilize
marketing concepts to enhance the saleability of our products. We recognize that retailers favor
certain price points. As part of our product development strategy, we strive to align our
wholesale prices to match retailers target prices as a means of achieving these popular price
targets.
Our sales and marketing team is located in our executive office in Hong Kong. Our marketing
and distribution strategy is to identify the strongest retail customers in each distribution
channel and to focus design and sales efforts towards the largest and fastest growing retailers.
We maintain a broad base of customers and concentrate our efforts on five major jewelry market
segments:
|
|
|
fine jewelers; |
|
|
|
|
national jewelry chains; |
|
|
|
|
department stores; |
|
|
|
|
TV shopping channels; and |
|
|
|
|
discount chain stores. |
Our sales promotion efforts include attendance by our representatives at US and international
trade shows and conventions, including Las Vegas, Orlando, New York, Basel, Switzerland, Hong Kong
and Japan. In addition, we advertise actively in trade journals and related industry publications.
Retail
Our retail brand, ENZO focuses on brand building strategy that differentiates itself from the
many mass market local competitors. This is the result of continuous marketing programs that built
an unique image and identity for ENZO.
ENZO has combined its product, sales and marketing programs that align with the strategic
direction of reinforcing the brand as one of the most recognized foreign jewelry brands in China.
With almost 100 retail points covering strategic locations in major cities, ENZO is the
foreign jewelry brand with the highest number of retail points in China. This perfect retail
platform provides the most effective touch points for the consumers, in particular the fast growing
middle class segment in China.
In 2007, total jewelry retail sales in China reached $26 billion and is expected to grow at a
double digit rate over the next few years.
-16-
Design and Product Development
We have 20 internationally trained designers who work in our Hong Kong and China offices. Our
designers create styles that have been accepted by our various clients worldwide. Our design teams
attend trade fairs worldwide to gather product ideas and monitor the latest product trends.
We provide our customers with a broad selection of high-quality 10, 14 and 18 karat gold,
platinum and sterling silver jewelry products that incorporate traditional yet fashionable styles
and designs. We currently offer more than 50,000 different styles of rings, bracelets, necklaces,
earrings, pendants and matching sets that are contemporary and desired in the market.
We study product trends that are emerging in the international market and adapt these trends
to the needs of our retail customers. The jewelry offered for sale considers colored, fabric and
fashion trends, which are projected over a two-year period. We market our products as lifestyle
inspired.
Production Process
We produce our jewelry at our facility in Shenzhen, China. Our production processes combine
vertical integration, modern technology, mechanization and handcraftsmanship to turn out
contemporary and fashionable jewelry. Our production operations basically involve:
|
|
|
cutting and polishing colored gemstones; |
|
|
|
|
combining pure gold, platinum or sterling silver with gemstones or diamonds to
produce jewelry; and |
|
|
|
|
finishing operations such as cleaning and polishing, resulting in high quality
finished jewelry. |
Supply
We cut our own colored stones. We purchase imported gemstones which are from South America,
Africa and China. South America is the major source of ametrine, amethyst, aquamarine, imperial
topaz, tourmaline and white topaz, and Africa is the main source of tanzanite, mandarine garnet,
aquamarine and topaz. We also purchase imported aquamarine, peridot and topaz from China. We
source our diamonds mainly from suppliers in India and Africa. We believe that we have good
relationships with our suppliers, most of whom have supplied us for many years.
We maintain our supply of inventory at our warehouse. The amount of our inventory of a
particular gemstone determines the extent and size of our marketing program for that product. We
purchase our gemstones and diamonds in advance and in anticipation of orders resulting from our
marketing programs.
We purchase our gold from banks, gold refiners and commodity dealers who supply substantially
all of our gold needs, which we believe is sufficient to meet our requirements.
-17-
Gold acquired for production is at least .995 fine and is combined with other metals to
produce 10, 14 and 18 karat gold. The term karat refers to the gold content of alloyed gold,
measured from a maximum of 24 karats, which is 100% fine gold. Varying quantities of metals such
as silver, copper, nickel and zinc are combined with fine gold to produce 14 karat gold of
different colors. These alloys are in abundant supply and are readily available to us.
We purchase our gold requirements within a reasonable period after each significant purchase
order is received.
We purchase supplies and raw materials from a variety of suppliers and we do not believe the
loss of any of the suppliers would have a material adverse effect on our business. Alternative
sources of supply for raw materials for production of jewelry are readily available.
Security
We have installed certain measures at our Shenzhen, China, production and our Hong Kong
facilities to protect against loss, including multiple alarm systems, infrared motion detectors and
a system of closed circuit television cameras, which provide surveillance of all critical areas of
our premises.
We carefully inspect all materials sent and received from outside suppliers, monitor the
location and status of all inventory, and have strict internal control procedures of all jewelry as
it proceeds through the production process. A complete physical inventory of gold and gemstones is
taken at our production and facilities on a quarterly basis.
Insurance
We maintain primary all-risk insurance, with limits which may be less than our current
inventory levels, to cover thefts and damage to inventory located on our premises. We also
maintain insurance covering thefts and damage to our owned inventory located off-site. The amount
of coverage available under such policies is limited and may vary by location, but is generally in
excess of the value of the gold, diamonds and gemstones supplied by us. We carry transit
insurance, the coverage of which includes the transportation of jewelry outside of our office.
Competition
The jewelry production industry is highly competitive, and our competitors include domestic
and foreign jewelry manufacturers, wholesalers, and importers who may operate on a national,
regional and local scale. Our competitive strategy is to provide competitively priced,
high-quality products to the high-volume retail jewelry market. According to our management,
competition is based on pricing, quality, service and established customer relationships. We
believe that we have positioned ourselves as a low-cost producer without compromising our
-18-
quality. Our ability to conceive, design and develop products consistent with the requirements of
each retail distribution channel represents a competitive advantage.
We believe that few competitors have the capacity and production skills to be effective
competitors. We believe that our vertically integrated production capabilities distinguish us from
most of our competitors and enable us to produce very competitively priced, high quality and
consistent products.
The North American market is highly fragmented but does contain a number of major competitors,
many of whom import much of their product from the Far East and many of whom sell higher priced
items. The key United States competitor is E.E.A.C. Inc. International competitors include Pranda
International and Beauty Gems Limited. Most of these manufacturers/wholesalers have been
successful vendors for many years and enjoy good relations with their clients. Although it may be
difficult for a newcomer to break into established relationships, we have already made substantial
inroads in the North American jewelry market and we believe we can remain competitive, based on our
vertically integrated, low-cost, high-volume and high-quality production process.
Regarding the China retail jewelry market, there are many Hong Kong, local and foreign
competitors. Those competitors may have product type, price range, market segment, target customer,
size, history, strategy and background similar to or different from ENZO. Hong Kong competitors
include Hong Kong-listed chain store operators such as Chow Sang Sang, Tse Sui Luen and Luk Fook;
the local Chinese retail competitor is Laofengxiang; and foreign competitors include Tiffany,
Cartier and Bvlgari.
C. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2007.
The following chart provides a listing of our significant subsidiaries. The respective
country of organization/incorporation is shown in brackets.
LJ INTERNATIONAL INC.
(British Virgin Islands)
100%
|
|
Lorenzo Jewelry Limited (Hong Kong) |
|
|
|
Lorenzo Jewellery (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (PRC) |
|
|
|
Lorenzo (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (PRC) |
|
98% |
|
|
|
Goldleaves Gems (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (PRC) |
-19-
D. PROPERTY, PLANTS AND EQUIPMENT.
Our principal executive office is located at Unit #12, 12/F, Block A, Focal Industrial Centre,
21 Man Lok Street, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong. We own approximately 11,100 square feet of office
and showroom at this location.
Our jewelry production facility in Shenzhen, China consists of 14,080 square meters of
building space located inside of and close to the Shatoujiao Free Trade Zone, Shenzhen. We own
approximately 6,893 square meters of this space. We also currently lease:
|
|
|
1,751 square meters for a term of five years expiring June 30, 2011 from an
unaffiliated third party at a rental rate of $3,817 per month; |
|
|
|
|
1,751 square meters for a term of two years expiring August 31, 2008, at a rental
rate of $4,490 per month; |
|
|
|
|
1,799 square meters for a term of three years expiring March 31, 2009, at a rental
rate of $4,381 per month; and |
|
|
|
|
1,886 square meters for a term of three years expiring September 30, 2009 at a
rental rate of $4,593 per month. |
We own two warehouse facilities in Hung Hom and Aberdeen consisting of 5,432 square feet and
5,200 square feet. We also own additional properties in Sai Kung and Hung Hom. We lease all four
of these properties to non-affiliated third parties. We have pledged all of our land and buildings
to collateralize general banking facilities granted to us.
Our production facilities are currently utilized for one shift per day but are capable of
being expanded to accommodate three shifts per day as necessary.
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
-20-
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial
statements and notes to the financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Form 20-F. See
Special Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements.
LJ International Inc., via its operating subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, distributes and
markets a full range of fine jewelry through both wholesale and retail channels under the
tradenames of LORENZO and ENZO, respectively. In term of sales revenue, geographically the US and
the PRC are the two major contributors.
Our product types include ring, bracelet, necklace, earring and pendant, and we are one of the
prominent companies in colored gemstones that employ the mine-to-market strategy for cost
minimization and ease of quality and production lead time control. Our colored gemstones are mainly
imported from Brazil and Africa which supply, in term of color, size and quality, the best colored
gemstones in the world, the choices of which to customers are many and diversified that includes,
amongst others, ametrine, amethyst, aquamarine, imperial topaz, tourmaline, white topaz, tanzanite,
mandarine garnet, topaz, ruby, sapphire and emerald.
Our wholesale customers comprise fine jewelers, national jewelry chain stores, department
stores and television shopping networks in North America, Western Europe, Japan and China. To keep
in touch with our customers and to ensure that they are updated with our latest designs and
products, we exhibited at the following international jewelry shows in 2007: Hong Kong January
Intl Jewellery & Watch Show, VicenzaOro1, JA Intl Jewelry (Winter) Show, Tucson 2007 Gem Show,
Hong Kong International Jewellery Show 2007, BaselWorld, The JCK Show Las Vegas 2007, JA
International Jewelry (Summer) Show, VicenzaOro Autumn, Hong Kong Jewellery & Watch Fair -
September 2007, JANY Special Delivery Show, and Jewellery Collection Dubai.
Our retail customers in China are individual consumers. Under the segment of retail business,
besides classic affordable luxury jewelry items that are available in our ENZO retail shops, the
Company also operates the ENZO Signature line that represents a truly luxury premium line of
jewelry that comprises, amongst others, diamond, ruby, sapphire, emerald and tourmaline. 2007
represents a year of rapid growth of ENZO in the PRC that it opened, net, 50 stores in the PRC as
at December 31, 2007 there were 91 stores in the PRC compared to 41 stores as at December 31, 2006.
Our business strategies include broadening the retail product line, and diversifying our
customer base. Besides focusing on our traditional colored gemstone jewelry business, we are also
continuing to develop our diamond jewelry business at our ENZO stores. Product initiatives include
a variety of different sizes, shape and cutting methods. Successful examples include our ENZO88 and
Gabrielle Diamond lines. The expansion of our diamond jewelry business will diversify our already
strong presence in colored jewelry, offering increasing choices of jewelry products to our
customers.
-21-
The revenue mix of the two streams of business of LORENZO (wholesale) and ENZO (retail) were
roughly in the ratio of 77% to 23% for the year ended December 31, 2007.
The wholesale business focuses on the US market with sales made to those $100 Million
Supersellers such as Sterling Jewelers Inc, Fred Meyer Jewelers, Helzberg Diamonds, ShopNBC, Zales
Corporation, QVC, Wal-Mart, Finlay Fine Jewelry, Home Shopping Network, Ben Bridge Jeweler, Kohls
Corporation, Macys East, Macys West and JC Penney. The turnover of our sales to those
Supersellers in the US and Canada amounted to $80.6 million for 2007 compared to $76.9 million in
2006, an increase of 5%.
Employing the brand new ENZO name, the retail business operates in the Asia Pacific region,
with a primary focus on the PRC market. ENZO currently has 94 stores in the PRC, two stores in
Macau and one store in Hong Kong, totaling 97 stores. ENZO now has one or more retail locations in
Chinas richest and largest population cities, including Shanghai, Beijing, Harbin, Qingdao,
Shenyang, Ningbo, Chengdu, Changsha, Wuxi, Tianjin, Dalian, Shenzhen, Changchun, Tangshan, Guiyang,
Xian, Anshan, Changshou, Hefei, Taiyuan, Shijiazhuang, Zhengzhou, Nanchang, Chongqing, Kunming and
Jinan. Our ENZO stores in the PRC operate in department stores and shopping malls. 18K gold is the
most popular, followed by 24K jewelry. The most popular diamonds are of 0.21 carat to 0.49 carat.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimate and judgments
that affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. These estimates
are based on our historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be
reasonable. Estimates are evaluated on an ongoing basis, but actual results may differ from these
estimates.
Critical accounting policies are those that, in managements view, are most important in the
portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations. Those that require significant
judgments and estimates include:
Collectibility of Accounts Receivable. Our management has a credit policy in place and the exposure
to credit risk is monitored on an ongoing basis. Credit evaluations are performed on all customers
requiring credit over a certain amount. Our international sales are settled via letter of credit or
open account. For export sales on open account, we purchased trade credit insurance to cover the
risk of collectibility, the insured percentage is 85% on the invoiced amount to customers. Past due
balances over 90 days and over a specified amount are reviewed individually for collectibility.
We make specific allowance for doubtful accounts based on our best estimate of the amount of losses
that could result from the inability or intention of our existing customers not to make the
-22-
required payments. We generally review the allowance by taking into account factors such as
historical experience, age of the accounts receivable balances and economic conditions that may
affect a customers ability to pay.
Stock-based Compensation. We account for share-based compensation in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS 123R), Share-Based Payment. SFAS 123R
requires us to use a fair-value based method to account for share-based compensation. Accordingly,
share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award,
and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. Our option plans are described more
fully in Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Goodwill Impairment. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually based on a two-step
approach. The first step is conducted by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its
carrying amount. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the second
step requires a comparison of the implied fair value of goodwill to its carrying value. The excess
of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities is
the implied fair value of goodwill. This allocation process is only performed for purposes of
evaluating goodwill impairment and does not result in an entry to adjust the value of any assets or
liabilities. An impairment loss is recognized for any excess in the carrying value of goodwill over
its implied fair value.
We have determined that iBBC Inc., a subsidiary of the Company in the US, is the reporting unit for
goodwill impairment testing. The fair value of iBBC Inc. is determined based on the discounted
expected cash flow method. The discount rate was based on the subsidiarys weighted average cost of
capital. The use of discounted cash flow methodology requires significant judgments including
estimation of future revenues and costs, industry economic factors, future profitability,
determination of iBBC Inc.s weighted average cost of capital and other variables. Although we
believe that the assumptions adopted in our discounted cash flow model are reasonable, those
assumptions are inherently unpredictable and uncertain.
We had goodwill of US$1,521,000 as of December 31, 2006 and 2007. The estimated fair value of the
reporting unit exceeded its carrying value at December 31, 2007. Consequently, no goodwill
impairment has been recognized.
Allowance for Obsolete Inventories. We established inventory allowance for unmarketable inventory
in an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and its estimated net realizable
value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Management records a
write-down against inventory based on several factors, including expected sales price of the item
and the length of time the item has been in inventory. If actual demand and
market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory
allowance could be required. In that event, our gross margin would be reduced. In case
-23-
of inventory which have been written down below cost at the close of a fiscal year, such reduced
amount forms a new cost basis that subsequently cannot be marked up based on changes in underlying
facts and circumstances.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 107 (SFAS No. 107), Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, for its
financial instruments. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the
instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. The carrying
amounts of financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, prepayments and other current assets, notes payable, capital lease obligations,
accounts payable, income taxes payable, and accrued expenses and
other current liabilities, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these
instruments and market rates of interest.
A. OPERATING RESULTS.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2007-2006 |
|
|
2006-2005 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jewelry product |
|
$ |
117,689 |
|
|
$ |
108,679 |
|
|
$ |
95,318 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
Giftware product |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,827 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
-100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
117,689 |
|
|
$ |
108,679 |
|
|
$ |
97,145 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
Retail |
|
$ |
34,348 |
|
|
$ |
15,112 |
|
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
|
|
127 |
% |
|
|
504 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
152,037 |
|
|
$ |
123,791 |
|
|
$ |
99,646 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in revenue of jewelry product of wholesale of $9,010,000 or 8% to $117,689,000
for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, was primarily
attributable to the increase in average selling price of 4%, increase in order quantity of 8%.
The increase in revenue of jewelry product of wholesale of $13,361,000 or 14% to $108,679,000
for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, was primarily
attributable to the increase in average selling price of 1% , increase in order quantity of 7% and
increase of $3.2 million from the launch of a gold jewelry product line.
-24-
The revenue of giftware product of wholesale for the year ended December 31, 2005 was
$1,827,000. This product line with low profit margin was closed during the third quarter of 2005.
The Companys retail business increased by $19,236,000, or 127% to $34,348,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. This increase was primarily
due to the successful launch of the ENZO Signature line of high-end jewelry which accounted for
$12,951,000 of the Companys retail business. The remaining increase was due to the Companys new
ENZO retail store openings and the continued operation of its existing 51 ENZO retail stores, that
is, a total of 95 ENZO retail stores in full operation compared to a total of 44 ENZO retail stores
on December 31, 2006.
The Companys retail business increased by $12,611,000, or 504%, from 2005 to $15,112,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2006. This increase was primarily due to the successful launch of the
ENZO Signature line of high-end jewelry. The service income related to line of high-end jewelry
accounted for $4,130,000 of the Companys retail business in 2006. The remaining increase was due
to the Companys new ENZO retail store openings and the continued operation of its existing 26 ENZO
retail stores, that is, a total of 44 ENZO retail stores in full operation compared to a total of
18 ENZO retail stores on December 31, 2005.
Cost of Sales and Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2007-2006 |
|
|
2006-2005 |
|
Cost of sales and gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
$ |
95,528 |
|
|
$ |
83,387 |
|
|
$ |
75,645 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
$ |
16,980 |
|
|
$ |
5,480 |
|
|
$ |
1,482 |
|
|
|
210 |
% |
|
|
270 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
112,508 |
|
|
$ |
88,867 |
|
|
$ |
77,127 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
$ |
22,161 |
|
|
$ |
25,292 |
|
|
$ |
21,500 |
|
|
|
-12 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
$ |
17,368 |
|
|
$ |
9,632 |
|
|
$ |
1,019 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
845 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
39,529 |
|
|
$ |
34,924 |
|
|
$ |
22,519 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross profit margin of wholesale decreased to 19% for the year ended December 31, 2007
from 23% for the year ended December 31, 2006 and was attributable to the sales of product which
are with lower gross profit margin.
-25-
The gross profit margin of wholesale increased to 23% for the year ended December 31, 2006
from 22% for the year ended December 31, 2005 and was attributable to the sales of a higher-end
product mix.
The gross profit margin of ENZO retail operation decreased to 51% for the year ended December
31, 2007 compared to 64% for the year ended December 31, 2006. The gross profit margin of 64% in
2006 was attributable to the service income from launch of the ENZO Signature line of jewelry
products which substantially increased the retail divisions gross profit margins. Excluding the
contribution from service income, the gross profit margin of retail operation remained at 51% for
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
The gross profit margin of ENZO retail operation increased to 64% for the year ended December
31, 2006 compared to 41% for the year ended December 31, 2005 and was attributable to the service
income from launch of the ENZO Signature line of jewelry products which substantially increased the
retail divisions gross profit margins. Excluding the service income, the gross profit margin of
retail operation was 51% for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2007-2006 |
|
|
2006-2005 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
$ |
13,072 |
|
|
$ |
13,324 |
|
|
$ |
11,545 |
|
|
|
-2 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Retail |
|
$ |
15,251 |
|
|
$ |
7,562 |
|
|
$ |
2,653 |
|
|
|
102 |
% |
|
|
185 |
% |
Corporate |
|
$ |
2,076 |
|
|
$ |
2,228 |
|
|
$ |
1,290 |
|
|
|
-7 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,399 |
|
|
$ |
23,114 |
|
|
$ |
15,488 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by 32% for the year ended December 31,
2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. For the wholesale business, the selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased by 2% for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared
to the same of year 2006. The decrease was mainly attributable to decrease in development cost of
new products, designs and markets. The expenses incurred by the retail business of $15,251,000, or
102% increase of the same for the year ended December 31, 2006, comprised advertising cost of
$2,058,000, rental cost of $5,367,000, staff cost of $4,933,000 and other expenses of $2,893,000 as
a result of higher sales and increased store counts. The corporate expenses included items of
corporate overheads, such as charges for legal and professional advisory services.
-26-
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by 49% for the year ended December 31,
2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. For the wholesale business, the selling,
general and administrative expenses increased by 15% for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared
to the same of year 2005. The increase mainly comprised 2% increase in selling and distribution
expenses which varied to sales revenues, 2% increase in manpower on development of new products,
designs and markets and 5% increase in staff cost. The expenses incurred by the retail business of
$7,562,000, or 185% increase of the same for the year ended December 31, 2005, comprised
advertising cost of $1,142,000, rental cost of $2,454,000, staff cost of $2,198,000 and other
expenses of $1,768,000 as a result of higher sales and increased store counts. The corporate
expenses included items of corporate overheads, such as charges for legal and professional advisory
services.
Net gain (loss) on derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2007-2006 |
|
|
2006-2005 |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on
derivatives |
|
$ |
(349 |
) |
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
(88 |
) |
|
|
-284 |
% |
|
|
-316 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(With the hedging mechanism in place,
we have the realized gain on hedging activities) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain (loss) on hedging
activities |
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
$ |
(219 |
) |
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
|
-258 |
% |
|
|
-328 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) gain on derivatives and
hedging activities |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
-86 |
% |
|
|
-463 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have secured gold loan facilities with various banks in Hong Kong, which typically bear a
below-market interest rate. Under the gold loan arrangements, we may defer the purchase until such
time as we decide appropriate, the price to be paid being the current market price at time of
payment. The gold loan, however, does expose us to certain market risks associated with potential
future increases in the price of gold. In the past, we did not hedge against such risks and at the
close of each reporting period, the gold loan was valued at fair value with changes reflected on
the income statement.
Since 2003, we have commenced hedging the fluctuations in the price of gold related to the
gold loans by entering into contracts with financial institutions for the future purchase of
gold. With the hedging mechanism in place, we have incurred an unrealized loss of $349,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2007, and an unrealized gain of $190,000 and an unrealized loss of
-27-
$88,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 respectively; and a realized gain of
$345,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007, and a realized loss of $219,000 and a realized gain
of $96,000 on derivatives for each of the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 respectively.
The hedging mechanism has been in place since 2003. We secured position of a net loss of
$4,000 and $29,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and a net
gain on derivative hedging activities of $8,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2007-2006 |
|
|
2006-2005 |
|
Depreciation |
Wholesale |
|
$ |
1,995 |
|
|
$ |
1,425 |
|
|
$ |
1,154 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
614 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
187 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,095 |
|
|
$ |
2,039 |
|
|
$ |
1,368 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of wholesale business increased by 40% to $1,995,000 for the year ended December
31, 2007 from $1,425,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006, which reflected the amortization on
the on-going capital expenditures, and a full years amortization on cost of renovation and motor
vehicles incurred in 2006. Depreciation of retail business increased by 79% to $1,100,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $614,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 which reflected the
amortization of the capital expenditures of renovation on the increased number of retail stores
during the year.
Depreciation of wholesale business increased by 23% to $1,425,000 for the year ended December
31, 2006 from $1,154,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005, and reflected the amortization on
the on-going capital expenditures, renovation and new motor vehicles. Depreciation of retail
business increased by 187% to $614,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $214,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2005 and reflected the amortization of the capital expenditures of
renovation on the increased number of retail stores during the year.
-28-
Interest cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2007-2006 |
|
|
2006-2005 |
|
Interest expenses |
|
$ |
3,103 |
|
|
$ |
3,258 |
|
|
$ |
1,991 |
|
|
|
-5 |
% |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expenses decreased by $155,000 or 5% to $3,103,000 for the year ended December 31,
2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, was primarily attributable to the decrease in
interest rates and decrease in utilization level of credit lines of letters of credit and gold
loans.
Interest expenses increased by $1,267,000, or 64% to $3,258,000 for the year ended December
31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. This increase reflected the continuous
increase in interest rates and a higher utilization level of credit line facilities as working
capital.
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2007-2006 |
|
|
2006-2005 |
|
Income taxes expense |
Wholesales |
|
$ |
1,015 |
|
|
$ |
682 |
|
|
$ |
739 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
-8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
721 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
-3 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,711 |
|
|
$ |
1,403 |
|
|
$ |
739 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We were incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and, under current law of the British
Virgin Islands, are not subject to tax on income or on capital gains.
For our subsidiaries in Hong Kong, the prevailing corporate income tax rate is 17.5%.
Three of our subsidiaries in China are registered to be qualified as Foreign Investment
Enterprises in China and are eligible for certain tax holidays and concessions. Accordingly,
certain of our Chinese subsidiaries are exempt from Chinese income tax for two years starting from
their first profit-making year, followed by a 50% reduction of tax for the next three years.
One of our subsidiaries in China is enjoying the tax holiday as its first profit-making year
in 2004 and another subsidiary in China is enjoying the tax holiday as its first profit-making year
-29-
in 2005. PRC income tax is calculated at the applicable rates relevant to these subsidiaries which
currently are 15%.
For other subsidiaries in China, the prevailing corporate income tax rate is 33%. The
prevailing corporate income rate is 15% for companies operating in special economic zones of China.
Incomes taxes included tax under provision adjustment of $195,000, $72,000 and $77,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 respectively, after the finalization of tax assessment
for prior years.
Extraordinary gain on negative goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2007-2006 |
|
|
2006-2005 |
|
Extraordinary gain on negative
goodwill |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,291 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
-100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain on negative goodwill of $1,291,000 was arisen from the sequential
acquisition of a company whose principal activities are the manufacturing and trading of rough and
pre-formed gemstones (the Investee).
Pursuant to the purchase agreement dated January 1, 2005, the Company paid US$2,827,500 to the
Investee for the issuance of 3,900 new shares therein, in which the Company had 20% equity
interests. The Company then became the major stockholder holding 98% equity interests in the
Investee, which became a subsidiary of the Company.
Inflation
We do not consider inflation to have had a material impact on our results of operations over
the last three years.
Foreign Exchange
Approximately 76% of our sales are denominated in US Dollars whereas the other sales are
basically denominated in Hong Kong Dollars and Renminbi. The largest portion of our expenses are
denominated in Hong Kong Dollars, followed by US Dollars and Renminbi. The exchange rate of the
Hong Kong Dollar is currently pegged to the US Dollar, but during the past several years the market
exchange rate has fluctuated within a narrow range. The Chinese government principally sets the
exchange rate between the Renminbi and all other currencies. As a result, the exchange rates
between the Renminbi and the US Dollar and the Hong Kong
-30-
Dollar have fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate in the future. If the value of the Renminbi or the
Hong Kong Dollar depreciates relative to the US Dollar, such fluctuation may have a positive effect
on the results of our operations. If the value of the Renminbi or the Hong Kong Dollar appreciates
relative to the US Dollar, such fluctuation may have a negative effect on the results of our
operations. We do not currently hedge our foreign exchange positions.
Governmental economic and political policies and factors
For information regarding governmental economic, fiscal, monetary and political policies that
could materially affect our operations, directly or indirectly, please refer to the Risk Factors
section on pages 4 to 10.
B. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES.
We have no direct business operations other than the ownership of our subsidiaries and
investment securities. Our ability to pay dividends and meet other obligations depends upon our
receipt of dividends or other payments from our operating subsidiaries and investment securities.
Our operating subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on their ability to make distributions to
us, including as a result of restrictive covenants and minimum net worth requirements in loan
agreements, restrictions on the conversion of local currency into US dollars or other hard currency
and other regulatory restrictions.
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
2,203 |
|
|
$ |
(6,200 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,222 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,806 |
) |
|
|
(3,829 |
) |
|
|
(4,655 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(1,309 |
) |
|
|
11,096 |
|
|
|
20,450 |
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
-31-
Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,489 |
|
|
$ |
5,325 |
|
|
$ |
4,351 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
and properties held for lease |
|
|
3,095 |
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
Extraordinary gain on negative goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
88 |
|
Loss on disposal and write-off of property, plant
and equipment |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Reversal of doubtful debts |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Minority interests |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Compensation costs for warrants granted |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Compensation expenses recognized during the
year |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
(8,607 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(13,261 |
) |
|
|
(12,810 |
) |
|
|
(12,060 |
) |
Prepayments and other current assets |
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
601 |
|
Due from related parties |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Trade payables |
|
|
9,487 |
|
|
|
(2,955 |
) |
|
|
1,883 |
|
Accrued expenses and other payables |
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
(854 |
) |
Income taxes payable and deferred taxation |
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
2,203 |
|
|
|
(6,200 |
) |
|
|
(14,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by and used in operating activities was net income adjusted for certain
non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities.
For the year ended December 2007, net cash provided by operating activities was comprised of a
net income of $1,489,000, non-cash adjustment of $3,626,000 including adjustment of $3,095,000 for
depreciation.
For the year ended December 2006, net cash used in operating activities was comprised of a net
income of $5,325,000, non-cash adjustment of $2,362,000 including adjustment of $2,039,000 for
depreciation.
Significant changes in assets and liabilities were as follows:
Trade receivables were decreased by $702,000 and $1,106,000 for the year ended December 31,
2007 and 2006 respectively.
-32-
Inventory balance was increased by $13,261,000 and $12,810,000 for the year ended December 31,
2007 and 2006 respectively. It was the accumulation of inventory of gemstones in anticipation of
significant increase in sales for the new fiscal year, and the build up of inventory for retail
business, the rise in the cost of gold and rough gemstones, the build-up of more sample lines of
jewelry and the maintaining of sufficient inventory for block-orders.
Trade payables increased by $9,487,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007 due to increased
level of material purchases during last quarter of the year. The decrease by $2,955,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2006 due to reduced level of material purchases during last quarter of the
year.
Investing Activities:
For the year ended December 31, 2007, net cash used in investing activities was for capital
expenditures and partially offset by the deduction in restricted cash. Capital expenditures were
mainly for renovation of headquarter office in Hong Kong, on-going improvements of the existing
production facilities in Shenzhen, and other business necessities, and renovation of new stores for
the retail business.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, net cash used in investing activities was for capital
expenditures and partially offset by the deduction in restricted cash. Capital expenditures were
mainly for on-going improvements of the existing production facilities in Shenzhen, and other
business necessities including computer system upgrade, acquisition of motor vehicles, and
renovation of stores for the retail business.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, net cash used in investing activities was for capital
expenditures and the purchase of a capital guaranteed fund, which was partially offset by the
deduction in restricted cash. Capital expenditures were mainly for acquisition of a production
facility in Shenzhen, renovation and improvement of the existing production facilities in Shenzhen,
other ongoing business necessities, including a new computer system and a motor vehicle and the
renovation of shops for our new retail business. The capital guaranteed fund was purchased from
banks for securing new banking facilities.
-33-
Our capital expenditures by category for the periods presented were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Land & buildings |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
617 |
|
Leasehold improvement |
|
$ |
2,156 |
|
|
$ |
2,852 |
|
|
$ |
783 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
$ |
660 |
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
$ |
1,060 |
|
Plant and machinery |
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
209 |
|
Motor vehicles |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,139 |
|
|
$ |
4,183 |
|
|
$ |
2,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities:
Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $1,309,000,
which included proceeds of $10,576,000 from issuance of shares upon exercise of stock options and
warrants, sales proceeds of derivatives, increase of new loans and offset by the repayment of
matured bank loans, change in letter of credit and factoring and increase in bank overdrafts
utilization level.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2006 was
$11,096,000, which included proceeds of $4,191,000 from issuance of shares in private placement,
proceeds of $4,744,000 from issuance of shares upon exercise of stock options and warrants, sales
proceeds of derivatives, increase of new loans and offset by the repayment of matured bank loans,
change in letter of credit and factoring and decrease in bank overdrafts utilization level.
Our cash and cash equivalents are mainly held in US dollars and HK dollars.
Financing Sources
Banking Facilities and Notes Payables
We have various letters of credit, factoring facilities and overdrafts under banking
facilities. The banking facilities are collateralized by land and buildings, investment properties,
restricted cash deposits, factored receivables and personal guarantees of and properties owned by
one of our directors.
-34-
Letters of Credit, overdrafts and others:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
$ |
38,957 |
|
|
$ |
41,046 |
|
|
$ |
31,533 |
|
Overdraft |
|
$ |
4,141 |
|
|
$ |
3,564 |
|
|
$ |
3,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,098 |
|
|
|
44,610 |
|
|
|
34,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilized : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit utilized |
|
$ |
16,653 |
|
|
$ |
22,344 |
|
|
$ |
21,887 |
|
Overdraft utilized |
|
$ |
2,977 |
|
|
$ |
1,591 |
|
|
$ |
2,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,630 |
|
|
|
23,935 |
|
|
|
23,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The letters of credit and bank overdrafts are denominated in HK dollars and US dollars, bear
interest at the floating commercial bank lending rates in Hong Kong, and are renewable annually
with the consent of the relevant banks.
The factoring facilities granted are limited to the extent of accounts receivable
collateralized to the banks.
Notes payable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Notes payable |
|
$ |
5,201 |
|
|
$ |
5,365 |
|
|
$ |
3,079 |
|
We have term loans classified under notes payable which are related to the Groups properties.
These loans are denominated in HK dollars and Renminbi and bear interest at pre-fixed rates in
Hong Kong and China upon renewal.
-35-
Gold Loan Facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
(in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Gold loans outstanding (in $) |
|
$ |
4,883 |
|
|
$ |
11,079 |
|
|
$ |
10,756 |
|
Gold loans outstanding (in troy ounces) |
|
|
11,150 |
|
|
|
26,920 |
|
|
|
27,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold loan interest rate |
|
|
3.1%-3.3 |
% |
|
|
2.6%-3.1 |
% |
|
|
2.4%-2.6 |
% |
We have also secured gold loan facilities with various banks in Hong Kong, which bear a
below-market interest rate. Due to lower interest rates charged for gold loans, our cost through
our gold loan program has been substantially less than the costs that would have been incurred if
we were to finance the purchase of all of our gold requirements with borrowings under our letter of
credit facility or other credit arrangements. The gold loan, however, does expose us to certain
market risks associated with potential future increases in the price of gold, so in 2003, we have
put in place mechanisms to hedge against such risks. Under the gold loan arrangements, we may
defer the purchase until such time as we deem appropriate, the price to be paid being the current
market price at time of payment. At the close of each reporting period, the gold loan is valued at
fair value with changes reflected on the income statement.
Looking Forward:
We anticipate that cash flow from operations, borrowings available under our existing credit
line and our gold loan arrangement will be sufficient to satisfy our capital needs for 2008.
Impact of recently issued US GAAP accounting standards
SFAS No. 157. In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 157 (SFAS No. 157), Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, provides a
framework for measuring fair value, and expands the disclosures required for fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require fair value
measurements and does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for
fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. We are required to adopt SFAS No. 157 beginning on
January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 is required to be applied prospectively, except for certain financial
instruments. Any transition adjustment will be recognized as an adjustment to opening retained
earnings in the year of adoption. In November 2007, the FASB proposed a one-year deferral of SFAS
No. 157s fair value measurement requirements for non-financial assets and liabilities that are not
required or permitted to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. We do not expect the
adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have a material impact on its financial statements.
-36-
SFAS No. 159. In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 159 (SFAS No. 159), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. SFAS No.
159 allows entities to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial assets
and liabilities at fair value that are not otherwise required to be measured at fair value. If a
company elects the fair value option for an eligible item, changes in that items fair value in
subsequent reporting periods must be recognized in current earnings. SFAS No. 159 also establishes
presentation and disclosure requirements designed to draw comparison between entities that elect
different measurement attributes for similar assets and liabilities. We do not expect the adoption
of SFAS No. 159 will have a material impact on its financial statements.
SFAS No. 141R. In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 141R (SFAS No. 141R), Business Combinations, which is a revision of SFAS No. 141,
Business Combinations. This statement establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree; recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and determines
what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and
financial effects of the business combination. We are required to apply this new standard
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning
of the annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is
prohibited. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 141R on our
consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 160. In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 160 (SFAS No. 160), Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries
held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the
parent and to the non-controlling interest, changes in a parents ownership interest and the
valuation of retained non-controlling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS
No. 160 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish between the
interests of the parent and the interests of the non-controlling owners. We are required to adopt
this new standard for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 160 on
our consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 161. In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
161 (SFAS No. 161), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities An Amendment
of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures on derivative and hedging
activities by requiring objectives to be disclosed for using derivative instruments in terms of
underlying risk and accounting designation. This statement
requires disclosures on the need of using derivative instruments, accounting of derivative
-37-
instruments and related hedged items, if any, under SFAS No. 133 and the effect of such instruments
and related hedge items, if any, on the financial position, financial performance and cash flows.
We are required to adopt this new statement for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We
are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 161 on our consolidated financial
statements.
SFAS No. 162. In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 162 (SFAS No. 162), The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The
new standard is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or
hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that
are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for non-governmental
entities. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following the SECs approval of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We are currently evaluating the impact of
the adoption of SFAS No. 162 on our consolidated financial statements.
C. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES, ETC.
During each of the last three fiscal years, we did not spend any significant amounts on
company-sponsored research and development activities.
D. TREND INFORMATION.
Other than as disclosed elsewhere in this annual report, we are not aware of any known trends,
uncertainties, demands, commitments or events for the period from January 1, 2007 to December 31,
2007 that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our net sales or revenues,
income, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that caused the disclosed financial
information to be not necessarily indicative of future operating results or financial conditions.
E. OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS.
Except for those arrangements which are disclosed in the Consolidated Financial Statements, we
do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current
or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses,
results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to
investors.
-38-
F. TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS.
As of the December 31, 2007, we had the following known contractual obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
I year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital (Finance) Lease Obligations |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations |
|
|
3,299 |
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We had entered into finance lease agreements for the purchase of motor vehicles in 2003 and
2006. The financed amounts were $95,000 and $366,000, bearing interest at 5%-6% and 3.25%-3.5% per
annum, and repayable in 60 monthly installments beginning in 2003 and 2006 respectively. A minimum
finance charge may be charged if we pay off all the balances early.
-39-
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
A. DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT.
Our senior management and directors are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
Yu Chuan Yih |
|
|
68 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and
Chief Executive Officer |
Ka Man Au |
|
|
43 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer, Secretary and Director |
Hon Tak Ringo Ng |
|
|
48 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Director |
Andrew N. Bernstein |
|
|
55 |
|
|
Independent Non-Executive Director |
Xiang Xiong Deng |
|
|
43 |
|
|
Independent Non-Executive Director |
Jin Wang |
|
|
37 |
|
|
Independent Non-Executive Director |
Jieyun Yu |
|
|
42 |
|
|
Independent Non-Executive Director |
Po Yee Elsa Yue |
|
|
43 |
|
|
Independent Non-Executive Director (1) |
Chi Fai Frank Cheung |
|
|
45 |
|
|
Independent Non-Executive Director (2) (3) |
Wing Kwan Ted Lai |
|
|
45 |
|
|
Independent Non-Executive Director (3) |
Kelvin Wong |
|
|
41 |
|
|
Independent Non-Executive Director (3) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Resigned effective June 1, 2007 |
|
(2) |
|
Appointed effective June 1, 2007 |
|
(3) |
|
Resigned effective October 15, 2007 |
None of our directors and officers was selected due to any agreement or understanding with any
other person. There is no family relationship between any of our directors or executive officers
and any other director or executive officer.
Mr. Yih established the business of Lorenzo Jewelry Ltd. and has served as president and
managing director since 1987. Mr. Yih is primarily responsible for business development and
overall company management. He has over 20 years of experience in colored stone production and
marketing. Mr. Yih had been a gemstone trader in Brazil and has extensive experience and
relationships in gem sourcing and jewelry design. Mr. Yih is also the Founding Sponsor of the Hong
Kong branch of the Gemological Institute of America (GIA), the non-profit educational
organization for the jewelry industry.
Ms. Au has served as a director of Lorenzo Jewelry Ltd. since its incorporation in 1987. Ms.
Au has been our chief operating officer since January 1, 2002 and is primarily responsible for our
general administration, human resources, operations and management.
Mr. Ng has served as our chief financial officer since September 1997 and as one of our
directors since May 1, 2001. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in civil engineering
from the University of London in 1984 and his Master of Commerce in accounting and
-40-
commercial administration from the University of New South Wales in 1994. From July 1994 through
September 1997, he was an audit senior with Moores Rowland C.A., Certified Public Accountants. Mr.
Ng is a certified practicing accountant of the Australian Society of CPAs.
Mr. Bernstein joined us as an independent non-executive director in July 2005. He serves on
the Compensation and Nominating Committees. He earned his Bachelor of Science degree from Cornell
University in 1974 and his Juris Doctor degree from Boston College Law School in 1977. Since 1978,
Mr. Bernstein has been engaged in the private practice of law in Denver, Colorado, with emphasis on
the representation of private and public companies and their transactional, corporate and
securities matters. Mr. Bernstein has served as our US securities counsel since March 1997.
Mr. Deng joined us and was appointed as an independent non-executive director effective
October 29, 2007. He serves on the Audit and Nominating Committees. He has served as a Director of
Intermost Corp. (OTCBB: IMOT) since August 2005 and was appointed Acting Chief Executive Officer of
that company from August 2005 to September 2007. Mr. Deng graduated from Shenzhen University
(Bachelor of Law) and Shanghai Jiao Tong University (MBA). He is a member of the Shenzhen Board of
Arbitration and formerly the General Manager of a number of state-owned and private enterprises. He
is experienced in both capital management and investment banking.
Mr. Wang joined us and was appointed as an independent non-executive director effective
October 29, 2007. He serves as chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Nominating and
Compensation committees. He is currently Vice President of the Shenzhen Shengwei Taxation Co. Ltd.
and has held that position since January 2006. Before that, he served in a number of posts with
responsibilities for financial management and auditing. These include Project Manager of the Audit
Department at the accounting firm Shenzhen Changcheng (2004-2005), Assistant Financial Manager at
Shenzhen Jinggong Design and Decoration Co. Ltd. (2003-2004) and Manager of the Finance Department
at Jiaguo Trading (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of China Group Investment
Co. Ltd (1997-2003).
Ms. Yu joined us and was appointed as an independent non-executive director effective October
29, 2007. She serves on the Audit and Compensation committees. She is currently Assistant Manager
of Finance at the headquarters of the Bank of China Group Insurance Co. Ltd. and General Manager of
Finance at the companys Shenzhen Branch Office. She has held these positions since June 2003.
Earlier, she served in finance management positions for Midland Realty (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.
(2001-2002), Intermost Corp. (1998-2001) and Guanghua Zhaori Production Co. Ltd. (1992-1998).
Before that she was a statistician and auditor (1998-2002) at the Shenzhen Culture Bureau.
Ms. Yue served as an independent non-executive director from December 1999 until her
resignation effective June 1, 2007. She is a graduate gemologist from the Gemological Institute of
America and served as vice president of GIA, Hong Kong, from August 1994 to December 2002. Her
responsibilities included managing the Hong Kong office and administering their
education programs, marketing and related activities. Since December 2002, Ms. Yue has served as a
manager for a colored gems import and export trading company.
-41-
Mr. Cheung served as an independent non-executive director from his appointment effective June
1, 2007 until his resignation effective October 15, 2007. He has over 20 years of experience in
accounting, finance and administration and has held senior positions in various multinational
companies. He is the chief financial officer and an executive director of Sun Innovation Holdings
Ltd., a Hong Kong Stock Exchange-listed company engaged in property investment and in providing
value-added media and entertainment products to mobile phone users. He holds an MBA from University
of Technology, Sydney, Australia, and is an associate member of the Hong Kong Institute of
Certified Public Accountants as well as fellow member of the Association of Chartered Certified
Accountants. From 2001 to 2003, he was a director of e-Lux (Hong Kong) Ltd., a subsidiary of e-Lux
Corporation, in charge of value-added telecommunications in Hong Kong, Taiwan and the Peoples
Republic of China.
Mr. Lai served as an independent non-executive director from July 2005 until his resignation
effective October 15, 2007. He is a lawyer by profession. Mr. Lai received his law degree from
the University of London in 1984. He progressed from his legal career to become the managing
director of a listed company in Hong Kong at the age of 25 from 1987 to 2001. Mr. Lai was in
charge of the legal, accounting and investment operations of the company. Since 2001, he manages
his own investments and serves as a consultant to a law firm.
Mr. Wong served as an independent non-executive director from July 2005 until his resignation
effective October 15, 2007. Since 2002, he serves as the finance director of a Hong Kong-based
private conglomerate group which mainly engages in garment manufacturing and property investments.
Mr. Wong earned a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Southern California in 1990,
majoring in accounting. He was formerly the manager of the Assurance and Business Advisory
Services division of PriceWaterhouseCoopers in Hong Kong. Mr. Wong has over 14 years of experience
in the accounting and finance field. He is currently a member of the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants, the California State Board of Accountancy and the Hong Kong Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.
-42-
B. COMPENSATION.
The aggregate compensation paid by us to all of our directors and executive officers as a
group for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 on an accrual basis, for services in all
capacities, was $1,477,000. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, we contributed an
aggregate amount of $41,000 toward the pension plans of our directors and executive officers.
Executive Service Contract
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Yu Chuan Yih, effective January 1, 2007, for
a period of three years at an annual salary of $308,000. Mr. Yihs remuneration package includes
benefits with respect to an automobile. In addition, Mr. Yih is entitled to an annual management
bonus of a sum to be determined by the compensation committee of the board of directors at its
discretion, having regard for our operating results and the performance of Mr. Yih during the
relevant financial year.
On January 3, 2005, we had granted Mr. Yih, Ms. Au and Mr. Ng options exercisable to acquire
500,000 shares, 100,000 shares and 100,000 shares, respectively, at $3.00 per share at any time
through March 30, 2005.
On July 22, 2005, we had granted Mr. Yih, Ms. Au and Mr. Ng options exercisable to acquire
413,500 shares, 300,000 shares and 300,000 shares, respectively, at $2.25 per share at any time
through April 30, 2008.
We did not grant any options to any of our directors or executive officers during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006.
On January 5, 2007, we had granted Mr. Yih, Ms. Au and Mr. Ng options exercisable to acquire
500,000 shares, 100,000 shares and 100,000 shares, respectively, at $4.50 per share at any time
through February 4, 2007.
C. BOARD PRACTICES.
Each of our seven current directors was elected at our last annual meeting of shareholders
held on March 14, 2008 to serve a one-year term or until his/her successor is elected and
qualified.
There are no directors service contracts with us or any of our subsidiaries providing for
benefits upon termination of employment.
Audit Committee
We have established an audit committee, which currently consists of Xiang Xiong Deng, Jin Wang
and Jieyun Yu. Its functions are to:
-43-
|
|
|
recommend annually to the board of directors the appointment of our independent
public accountants; |
|
|
|
|
discuss and review the scope and the fees of the prospective annual audit and review
the results with the independent public accountants; |
|
|
|
|
review and approve non-audit services of the independent public accountants; |
|
|
|
|
review compliance with our existing accounting and financial policies; |
|
|
|
|
review the adequacy of our financial organization; and |
|
|
|
|
review our managements procedures and policies relative to the adequacy of our
internal accounting controls and compliance with US federal and state laws relating to
financial reporting. |
Nominating Committee
We have established a nominating committee, which currently consists of Xiang Xiong Deng, Jin
Wang and Andrew N. Bernstein. Its purpose and functions are to:
|
|
|
assess the size and composition of the board of directors in light of our operating
requirements and existing social attitudes and trends; |
|
|
|
|
develop membership qualifications for the board of directors and all board
committees; |
|
|
|
|
monitor compliance with board of director and board committee membership criteria; |
|
|
|
|
review and recommend directors for continued service as required based on our
evolving needs; |
|
|
|
|
coordinate and assist management and the board of directors in recruiting new
members to the board of directors; and |
|
|
|
|
investigate suggestions for candidates for membership on the board of directors and
recommend prospective directors, as required, to provide an appropriate balance of
knowledge, experience and capability on the board of directors, including stockholder
nominations for the board of directors. |
Compensation Committee
We have established a compensation committee, which currently consists of Andrew N. Bernstein,
Jieyun Yu and Jin Wang. Its purpose and functions are to:
|
|
|
review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of
the chief executive officer and other executive officers; |
|
|
|
|
evaluate the chief executive officers performance in light of such goals and
objectives at least annually and communicate the results to the chief executive officer
and the board of directors; |
|
|
|
|
set the chief executive officers compensation levels based on the foregoing
evaluation (including annual salary, bonus, stock options and other direct and indirect
benefits), with ratification by the independent directors of the full board of
directors; and |
-44-
|
|
|
set the other executive officers compensation levels (including annual salary,
bonus, stock options and other direct and indirect benefits). |
Nasdaq Requirements
Our common shares are currently listed on The Nasdaq Global Market and, for so long as our
securities continue to be listed, we will remain subject to the rules and regulations established
by Nasdaq as being applicable to listed companies. Nasdaq has adopted amendments to its Rule 4350
to impose various corporate governance requirements on listed securities. Section (a)(1) of Rule
4350 provides that foreign private issuers such as our company are required to comply with certain
specific requirements of Rule 4350, but, as to the balance of Rule 4350, foreign private issuers
are not required to comply if the laws of their home country do not otherwise require compliance.
We currently comply with the specifically mandated provisions of Rule 4350. In addition, we
have elected to voluntarily comply with certain other requirements of Rule 4350, notwithstanding
that our home country does not mandate compliance; although we may in the future determine to cease
voluntary compliance with those provisions of Rule 4350. However, we have determined not to comply
with the following provisions of Rule 4350 since the laws of the British Virgin Islands do not
require compliance:
|
|
|
our independent directors do not hold regularly scheduled meetings in executive
session; |
|
|
|
|
the compensation of our executive officers is not determined by an independent
committee of the board or by the independent members of the board of directors, and our
CEO may be present and participate in the deliberations concerning his compensation; |
|
|
|
|
related party transactions are not required to be reviewed or approved by our audit
committee or other independent body of the board of directors; and |
|
|
|
|
we are not required to solicit shareholder approval of stock plans, including those
in which our officers or directors may participate; stock issuances that will result in
a change in control; the issuance of our stock in related party transactions or other
transactions in which we may issue 20% or more of our outstanding shares; or, below
market issuances of 20% or more of our outstanding shares to any person. |
We may in the future determine to voluntarily comply with one or more of the foregoing provisions
of Rule 4350.
D. EMPLOYEES.
As of December 31, 2007, we employed approximately 3,600 persons on a full-time basis for our
production of jewelry, gemstone cutting and polishing, and retailing.
Approximately 100 of these people were our management and executive staff in Hong Kong, Macau and
China. None of our employees is represented by a labor union and we believe that our employee
relations are good.
-45-
E. SHARE OWNERSHIP.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our
shares of common stock as of June 1, 2008 by:
|
|
|
each person who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding
common stock; |
|
|
|
|
each of our current executive officers and directors; and |
|
|
|
|
all executive officers and directors as a group. |
As of June 1, 2008, we had 22,235,672 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.
This information gives effect to securities deemed outstanding pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d)(l)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
The address for each person named below is c/o LJ International Inc., Unit #12, 12/F, Block A,
Focal Industrial Centre, 21 Man Lok Street, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Holder |
|
Number |
|
Percent |
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned |
Yu Chuan Yih |
|
|
2,034,353 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Ka Man Au |
|
|
254,000 |
(1) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
Hon Tak Ringo Ng |
|
|
275,000 |
(2) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
Andrew N. Bernstein |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Xiang Xiong Deng |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Jin Wang |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Jieyun Yu |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
* |
All directors and executive officers as a group (7 persons) |
|
|
2,563,353 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Growth Developments Ltd. |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than 1% beneficial ownership |
|
(1) |
|
Includes options currently exercisable to acquire: |
|
|
|
150,000 shares of common stock at $2.00 per share at any time until June 30, 2013. |
-46-
(2) |
|
Includes options currently exercisable to acquire: |
|
|
|
150,000 shares of common stock at $2.00 per share at any time until June 30, 2013. |
The 1998 Stock Compensation Plan
Effective June 1, 1998, we adopted and approved the 1998 Stock Compensation Plan, which our
shareholders approved on December 9, 1998. The purpose of the plan is to:
|
|
|
encourage ownership of our common stock by our officers, directors, employees and
advisors; |
|
|
|
|
provide additional incentive for them to promote our success and our business; and |
|
|
|
|
encourage them to remain in our employ by providing them with an opportunity to
benefit from any appreciation of our common stock through the issuance of stock
options. |
Options constitute either incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the
United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or options which constitute nonqualified
options at the time of issuance of such options. The plan provides that incentive stock options
and/or nonqualified stock options may be granted to our officers, directors, employees and advisors
selected by the compensation committee. A total of 4,000,000 shares of common stock are authorized
and reserved for issuance during the term of the plan, which expires in June 2008. The
compensation committee has the sole authority to interpret the plan and make all determinations
necessary or advisable for administering the plan. The exercise price for any incentive option
must be at least equal to the fair market value of the shares as of the date of grant. Upon the
exercise of the option, the exercise price must be paid in full either in cash, shares of our stock
or a combination. If any option is not exercised for any reason, such shares shall again become
available for the purposes of the plan.
On October 17, 2000, the Company offered each option holder the opportunity to cancel all or
some of the stock options previously granted in exchange for the granting on April 30, 2001 of
options to acquire an equal number of shares with an exercise price equal to the then last sale
price of the stock on April 30, 2001, for a new term of seven years expiring April 30, 2008.
As of June 1, 2008, 3,980,000 options had been exercised and the following options to purchase
shares of our common stock under the plan were outstanding:
|
|
|
a total of 20,000 stock options to purchase 20,000 shares at $2.00 per share through
June 30, 2013, of which no stock options are held by our directors and officers as a
group. |
-47-
The 2003 Stock Compensation Plan
Effective July 1, 2003, we adopted and approved the 2003 Stock Compensation Plan, which our
shareholders approved on December 5, 2003. The purpose of the plan is to:
|
|
|
encourage ownership of our common stock by our officers, directors, employees and
advisors; |
|
|
|
|
provide additional incentive for them to promote our success and our business; and |
|
|
|
|
encourage them to remain in our employ by providing them with an opportunity to
benefit from any appreciation of our common stock through the issuance of stock
options. |
Options constitute either incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the
United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or options which constitute nonqualified
options at the time of issuance of such options. The plan provides that incentive stock options
and/or nonqualified stock options may be granted to our officers, directors, employees and advisors
selected by the compensation committee. A total of 4,000,000 shares of common stock are authorized
and reserved for issuance during the term of the plan, which expires in June 2013. The
compensation committee has the sole authority to interpret the plan and make all determinations
necessary or advisable for administering the plan. The exercise price for any incentive option or
nonqualified option may be less than the fair market value of the shares as of the date of grant.
Upon the exercise of the option, the exercise price must be paid in full either in cash, shares of
our stock or a combination. If any option is not exercised for any reason, such shares shall again
become available for the purposes of the plan.
As of June 1, 2008, 3,394,500 options had been exercised and the following options to purchase
shares of our common stock under the plan were outstanding:
|
|
|
a total of 433,500 stock options to purchase 433,500 shares at $2.00 per share
through June 30, 2013, of which 300,000 stock options are held by our directors and
officers as a group. |
The 2005 Stock Compensation Plan
Effective July 1, 2005, we adopted and approved the 2005 Stock Compensation Plan, which our
shareholders approved on September 26, 2005. The purpose of the plan is to:
|
|
|
encourage ownership of our common stock by our officers, directors, employees and
advisors; |
|
|
|
|
provide additional incentive for them to promote our success and our business; and |
|
|
|
|
encourage them to remain in our employ by providing them with an opportunity to
benefit from any appreciation of our common stock through the issuance of stock
options. |
Options constitute either incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the
United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or options which constitute nonqualified
options at the time of issuance of such options. The plan provides that incentive
-48-
stock options and/or nonqualified stock options may be granted to our officers, directors,
employees and advisors selected by the compensation committee. A total of 4,000,000 shares of
common stock are authorized and reserved for issuance during the term of the plan, which expires in
June 2015. The compensation committee has the sole authority to interpret the plan and make all
determinations necessary or advisable for administering the plan. The exercise price for any
incentive option or nonqualified option may be less than the fair market value of the shares as of
the date of grant. Upon the exercise of the option, the exercise price must be paid in full either
in cash, shares of our stock or a combination. If any option is not exercised for any reason, such
shares shall again become available for the purposes of the plan.
As of June 1, 2008, 1,500,000 options had been exercised and no options to purchase shares of
our common stock under the plan were outstanding.
Other Options and Warrants Outstanding
As of June 1, 2008, the following additional options and warrants to purchase shares of our
common stock were outstanding:
|
|
|
warrants to purchase an aggregate of 170,451 shares at $2.98 per share through
September 3, 2009 which we sold to a group of investors as part of a private placement
offering on September 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
On September 25, 2006, we issued, and 11 institutional investors purchased, an
aggregate of 1,466,668 shares of our common stock at $3.75 per share, as well as an
aggregate of 236,909 warrants to purchase 236,909 shares at an exercise price of $4.221
per share (the Short Term Warrants) and 366,668 warrants to purchase 366,668 shares
at an exercise price of $4.50 per share (the Long Term Warrants). In addition, our
placement agent received 29,333 Long Term Warrants with identical terms to the Long
Term Warrants issued to the investors (the Placement Agent Warrants). The Short Term
Warrants were exercisable at any time through February 5, 2007. The Long Term Warrants
are exercisable at any time on or after March 25, 2007 for a term of five years
thereafter. |
|
|
|
|
As of June 1, 2008, the following warrants remained outstanding: |
|
|
|
333,334 Long Term Warrants |
|
|
|
|
29,333 Placement Agent Warrants |
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
A. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS.
-49-
Please see Item 6.E. for share ownership information regarding our major shareholders. Our
major shareholders do not have different voting rights.
As of June 10, 2008, we had 253 record holders of our common stock. Of the 22,574,672 shares
outstanding as of June 10, 2008, 21,634,054 shares were held by CEDE & Co.
To the extent known to us, we are not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another
corporation, by any foreign government or by any other natural or legal persons severally or
jointly.
To our knowledge, there are no arrangements the operation of which may at a subsequent date
result in a change in control of our company.
B. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS.
Certain of our banking facilities are collateralized by properties owned by Yu Chuan Yih and
his personal guarantee to the extent of $21,244,000, $23,161,000 and $14,708,000 as of December 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Mr. Yih has not received any additional compensation or
consideration from us in return for his personal guarantees.
During the fiscal year ended April 30, 1999, we provided a guarantee to a bank in respect of
mortgage loans granted to Yu Chuan Yih to the extent of $632,000. As of December 31, 2007, the
balance of the mortgage loans amounted to $79,000.
We paid Andrew N. Bernstein, P.C., the law firm of which Andrew N. Bernstein, one of our
directors, is the sole shareholder, less than $200,000 for legal services rendered to us during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
C. INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL.
Not applicable.
-50-
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
A. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
The Consolidated Financial Statements are filed in this Annual Report as Item 18.
Export sales constitute a substantial majority of our total sales volume.
Securities Litigation. In September 2007, several shareholder class actions were filed in the
United States District Court for the Central District of California against the Company and certain
officers and directors of the Company, entitled Apple v. LJ International Inc., et al. (No.
07-06076), Cooper v. LJ International, Inc., et al. (No. 07/06213), and Lieben v. LJ International
Inc., et. al. (No. 07-06216). On February 8, 2008, the judge to whom the cases were referred
consolidated the cases and appointed lead plaintiff and lead counsel. On April 8, 2008, the lead
plaintiff filed an amended and consolidated complaint (the Complaint.)
The Complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. It seeks an unspecified amount of
damages on behalf of all persons who purchased LJ common stock during the period from February 15,
2007, to September 6, 2007 (the Class Period). The Complaint alleges that the Companys February
15, 2007 press release, which provided financial guidance for the Companys fourth quarter and
year-end 2006 net income and earnings, contained materially false and misleading statements.
Specifically, paragraph 10 of the Complaint alleges that the press release failed to disclose
known uncertainties, such as applicable tax provisions, that had material, adverse effects on LJs
2006 fourth quarter and full year earnings and net income. The Complaint alleges that the
defendants overstated the Companys fiscal 2006 financial results, and thereby artificially
inflated the market price of LJs common stock throughout the Class Period.
On May 27, 2008, the Company (the only defendant served with the Complaint) moved to dismiss
the Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
At this time, we are unable to form a professional judgment as to whether unfavorable outcomes
are either probable or remote.
Derivative Litigation. Two purported shareholder derivative lawsuits, Vaughn v. Yih, et al.
(Los Angeles Superior Court No. BC 378903) and Cooke vs. Yih, et al. (Los Angeles Superior Court
No. BC 380214), were filed in California in Los Angeles County Superior Court on October 10 and
November 5, 2007, respectively.
The complaints in the derivative actions allege, among other things, that various officers and
directors of the Company caused the Company to issue a series of press releases, Securities and
Exchange Commission filings, and other statements that significantly overstated the Companys
business prospects and financial results. They further allege that, as a result of these
-51-
statements, the Companys share price traded at artificially inflated levels, and that
defendants actions led to a delay in the release of the Companys financial statements for the
fiscal fourth quarter of 2006 and the fiscal first quarter of 2007. The plaintiffs purport to state
causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment. By
their complaints, they seek, among other relief, unspecified damages to be paid to the Company,
corporate governance reforms, and equitable and injunctive relief, including restitution and the
creation of a constructive trust.
On May 9, 2009, the court in the Vaughn action sustained the defendants demurrer without
leave to amend on the ground that the plaintiff failed to obtain the required leave from the High
Court of the British Virgin Islands to file the derivative action. The Vaughn action was dismissed
pursuant to the order sustaining the demurrer. On May 15, 2008, the plaintiff filed a notice of
appeal from the order of dismissal.
In May 2008, the Cooke action was reassigned to the same judge that presided over the Vaughn
action. The Company anticipates that the court will set a status conference in due course.
At this time, we are unable to form a professional judgment as to whether unfavorable outcomes
are either probable or remote.
Shao v. Yih, et al. On October 28, 2007, the former chief executive officer of Lorenzo USA,
Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of LJ), sued LJ, Lorenzo USA, Inc., and LJs Chief Executive
Officer Yu Chuan Yih in Los Angeles Superior Court, Shao v, Yih, et al., Case No. BC379851. The
plaintiff claimed that the defendants wrongfully refused to honor his valid exercise of options for
the purchase of LJ stock. On April 25, 2008, the parties agreed to settle the dispute at mediation.
The plaintiff has filed a Request for Dismissal in May 2008.
B. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES.
We believe that no significant changes have occurred since the date of the annual financial
statements included in this annual report.
-52-
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
A. OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS.
Our common stock is listed and quoted for trading on The Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol
JADE. The following table sets forth, during the periods indicated, the high and low last sale
prices for the common stock as reported by Nasdaq:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
High |
|
Low |
Year ended December 31, 2003 |
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
5.74 |
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
3.95 |
|
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
4.60 |
|
|
$ |
3.08 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
12.86 |
|
|
$ |
2.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
4.16 |
|
|
$ |
3.34 |
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
3.79 |
|
|
$ |
3.08 |
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
4.59 |
|
|
$ |
3.67 |
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
4.60 |
|
|
$ |
3.71 |
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
12.00 |
|
|
$ |
4.42 |
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
12.86 |
|
|
$ |
8.93 |
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
12.37 |
|
|
$ |
3.99 |
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
6.15 |
|
|
$ |
2.18 |
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
5.45 |
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2008* |
|
$ |
3.90 |
|
|
$ |
2.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month ended December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
5.72 |
|
|
$ |
3.25 |
|
Month ended January 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
5.45 |
|
|
$ |
3.10 |
|
Month ended February 29, 2008 |
|
$ |
3.56 |
|
|
$ |
3.16 |
|
Month ended March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3.10 |
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
Month ended April 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
3.15 |
|
|
$ |
2.56 |
|
Month ended May 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3.90 |
|
|
$ |
2.61 |
|
Month ended June 30, 2008* |
|
$ |
3.73 |
|
|
$ |
2.89 |
|
-53-
B. PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION.
Not applicable.
C. MARKETS.
Our common stock has been listed and quoted for trading on The Nasdaq Global Market (formerly
The Nasdaq National Market) since April 15, 1998.
D. SELLING SHAREHOLDERS.
Not applicable.
E. DILUTION.
Not applicable.
F. EXPENSES OF THE ISSUE.
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A. SHARE CAPITAL.
Not applicable.
B. MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION.
Corporate Powers. We have been registered in the British Virgin Islands since January 30,
1997, under British Virgin Islands International Business Companies number 216796. Clause 4 of our
Memorandum of Association states that the objects for which we are established are to engage in any
businesses which are not prohibited by law in force in the British Virgin Islands.
-54-
Directors. A director who is materially interested in any transaction with us shall declare
the material facts of and nature of his interest at the meeting of the Board of Directors. A
director may vote or be counted as the quorum on any resolution of the Board in respect of any
transaction in which he is materially interested. With the prior or subsequent approval by a
resolution of directors, the directors may fix the emoluments of directors with respect to services
to be rendered in any capacity to us. The directors may, by a resolution of directors, exercise
all the powers of the Company to borrow money. There is no age limit requirement for retirement or
non-retirement of directors. A director shall not require a share qualification.
Share Rights, Preferences and Restrictions. Our authorized share capital is US$1 million
divided into 100 million shares of par value US$0.01 per share. All dividends unclaimed for three
years after having been declared may be forfeited by resolution of the directors for our benefit.
All shares vote as one class and each whole share has one vote. Directors stand for reelection on
an annual basis. Cumulative voting for directors is not authorized. We may redeem any of our own
shares for such fair value as we by a resolution of directors determine. All shares have the same
rights with regard to dividends and distributions upon our liquidation.
Changing Share Rights. The rights of each class and series of shares that we are authorized
to issue shall be fixed by the resolution of directors. If the authorized capital is divided into
different classes, the rights attached to any class may be varied with the consent in writing of
the holders of not less than three-fourths of the issued shares of that class and of the holders of
not less than three-fourths of the issued shares of any other class which may be affected by such
variation.
Shareholder Meetings. The directors may convene meetings of our members at such times and in
such manner and places as the directors consider necessary or desirable. The directors shall
convene such a meeting upon the written request of members holding 10 percent or more of our
outstanding voting shares. At least seven days notice of the meeting shall be given to the
members whose names appear on the share register.
Restrictions on Rights to Own Securities. There are no limitations on the rights to own our
securities.
Change in Control Provisions. There are no provisions of our Memorandum of Association and
Articles of Association that would have an effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in
our control and that would have operate only with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate
restructuring involving us.
Disclosure of Share Ownership. There are no bylaw provisions governing the ownership
threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed.
Applicable Law. Under the laws of most jurisdictions in the US, majority and controlling
shareholders generally have certain fiduciary responsibilities to the minority shareholders.
Shareholder action must be taken in good faith and actions by controlling shareholders which are
obviously unreasonable may be declared null and void. BVI law protecting the interests of
-55-
minority shareholders may not be as protective in all circumstances as the law protecting minority
shareholders in US jurisdictions.
While BVI law does permit a shareholder of a BVI company to sue its directors derivatively,
that is, in the name of, and for the benefit of, our company and to sue a company and its directors
for his benefit and for the benefit of others similarly situated, the circumstances in which any
such action may be brought, and the procedures and defenses that may be available in respect of any
such action, may result in the rights of shareholders of a BVI company being more limited than
those of shareholders of a company organized in the US.
Our directors have the power to take certain actions without shareholder approval, including
an amendment of our Memorandum of Association or Articles of Association or an increase or
reduction in our authorized capital, which would require shareholder approval under the laws of
most US jurisdictions. In addition, the directors of a BVI corporation, subject in certain cases
to court approval but without shareholder approval, may, among other things, implement a
reorganization, certain mergers or consolidations, the sale, transfer, exchange or disposition of
any assets, property, part of the business, or securities of the corporation, or any combination,
if they determine it is in the best interests of the corporation, its creditors, or its
shareholders. Our ability to amend our Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association
without shareholder approval could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in
our control without any further action by the shareholders, including a tender offer to purchase
our common stock at a premium over then current market prices.
The International Business Companies Act of the British Virgin Islands permits the creation in
our Memorandum and Articles of Association of staggered terms of directors, cumulative voting,
shareholder approval of corporate matters by written consent, and the issuance of preferred shares.
Currently, our Memorandum and Articles of Association only provide for shareholder approval of
corporate matters by written consent, but not for staggered terms of directors, cumulative voting
or the issuance of preferred shares.
As in most US jurisdictions, the board of directors of a BVI corporation is charged with the
management of the affairs of the corporation. In most US jurisdictions, directors owe a fiduciary
duty to the corporation and its shareholders, including a duty of care, under which directors must
properly apprise themselves of all reasonably available information, and a duty of loyalty, under
which they must protect the interests of the corporation and refrain from conduct that injures the
corporation or its shareholders or that deprives the corporation or its shareholders of any profit
or advantage. Many US jurisdictions have enacted various statutory provisions which permit the
monetary liability of directors to be eliminated or limited.
Under BVI law, liability of a corporate director to the corporation is primarily limited to
cases of willful malfeasance in the performance of his duties or to cases where the director has
not acted honestly and in good faith and with a view to the best interests of the corporation.
However, under our Articles of Association, we are authorized to indemnify any director or officer
who is made or threatened to be made a party to a legal or administrative proceeding by virtue of
being one of our directors or officers, provided such person acted honestly and in good faith and
with a view to our best interests and, in the case of a criminal proceeding, such person
-56-
had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful. Our Articles of Association also
enable us to indemnify any director or officer who was successful in such a proceeding against
expense and judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement and reasonably incurred in connection
with the proceeding.
The above description of certain differences between BVI and US corporate laws is only a
summary and does not purport to be complete or to address every applicable aspect of such laws.
However, we believe that all material differences are disclosed above.
Changes in Capital. Requirements to effect changes in capital are not more stringent than is
required by law.
C. MATERIAL CONTRACTS.
None.
D. EXCHANGE CONTROLS.
There are no material British Virgin Islands laws, decrees, regulations or other legislation
that impose foreign exchange controls on us or that affect our payment of dividends, interest or
other payments to non-resident holders of our capital stock. British Virgin Islands law and our
Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association impose no limitations on the right of
non-resident or foreign owners to hold or vote our common stock.
E. TAXATION.
The following is a summary of anticipated material US federal income and British Virgin
Islands tax consequences of an investment in our common stock. The summary does not deal with all
possible tax consequences relating to an investment in our common stock and does not purport to
deal with the tax consequences applicable to all categories of investors, some of which, such as
dealers in securities, insurance companies and tax-exempt entities, may be subject to special
rules. In particular, the discussion does not address the tax consequences under state, local and
other non-US and non-British Virgin Islands tax laws. Accordingly, each prospective investor
should consult its own tax advisor regarding the particular tax consequences to it of an investment
in the common stock. The discussion below is based upon laws and relevant interpretations in
effect as of the date of this annual report, all of which are subject to change.
-57-
United States Federal Income Taxation
The following discussion addresses only the material US federal income tax consequences to a
US person, defined as a US citizen or resident, a US corporation, or an estate or trust subject to
US federal income tax on all of its income regardless of source, making an investment in the common
stock. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1996, a trust will be a US person only if:
|
|
|
a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its
administration; and |
|
|
|
|
one or more United States persons have the authority to control all of its
substantial decisions. |
In addition, the following discussion does not address the tax consequences to a person who
holds or will hold, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of our common stock, which we refer to as a
10% Shareholder. Non-US persons and 10% Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax
advisors regarding the tax considerations incident to an investment in our common stock.
A US investor receiving a distribution of our common stock will be required to include such
distribution in gross income as a taxable dividend, to the extent of our current or accumulated
earnings and profits as determined under US federal income tax principles. Any distributions in
excess of our earnings and profits will first be treated, for US federal income tax purposes, as a
nontaxable return of capital, to the extent of the US investors adjusted tax basis in our common
stock, and then as gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset, provided that our common
stock constitutes a capital asset in the hands of the US investor. US corporate shareholders will
not be entitled to any deduction for distributions received as dividends on our common stock.
Gain or loss on the sale or exchange of our common stock will be treated as capital gain or
loss if our common stock is held as a capital asset by the US investor. Such capital gain or loss
will be long-term capital gain or loss if the US investor has held our common stock for more than
one year at the time of the sale or exchange.
A holder of common stock may be subject to backup withholding at the rate of 31% with
respect to dividends paid on our common stock if the dividends are paid by a paying agent, broker
or other intermediary in the United States or by a US broker or certain United States-related
brokers to the holder outside the United States. In addition, the proceeds of the sale, exchange
or redemption of common stock may be subject to backup withholding, if such proceeds are paid by a
paying agent, broker or other intermediary in the United States.
Backup withholding may be avoided by the holder of common stock if such holder:
|
|
|
is a corporation or comes within other exempt categories; or |
|
|
|
|
provides a correct taxpayer identification number, certifies that such holder is not
subject to backup withholding and otherwise complies with the backup withholding rules. |
-58-
In addition, holders of common stock who are not US persons are generally exempt from backup
withholding, although they may be required to comply with certification and identification
procedures in order to prove their exemption.
Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a holder will be
refunded or credited against the holders US federal income tax liability, if any, provided that
amount withheld is claimed as federal taxes withheld on the holders US federal income tax return
relating to the year in which the backup withholding occurred. A holder who is not otherwise
required to file a US income tax return must generally file a claim for refund or, in the case of
non-US holders, an income tax return in order to claim refunds of withheld amounts.
British Virgin Islands Taxation
Under the International Business Companies Act of the British Virgin Islands as currently in
effect, a holder of common stock who is not a resident of BVI is exempt from BVI income tax on
dividends paid with respect to the common stock and all holders of common stock are not liable for
BVI income tax on gains realized during that year on sale or disposal of such shares; BVI does not
impose a withholding tax on dividends paid by a company incorporated under the International
Business Companies Act.
There are no capital gains, gift or inheritance taxes levied by BVI on companies incorporated
under the International Business Companies Act. In addition, the common stock is not subject to
transfer taxes, stamp duties or similar charges.
There is no income tax treaty or convention currently in effect between the United States and
the British Virgin Islands.
F. DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS.
Not applicable.
G. STATEMENT BY EXPERTS.
Not applicable.
H. DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY.
The documents concerning our company, which are referred to in this annual report, may be
inspected at our principal executive offices at Unit #12, 12/F, Block A, Focal Industrial Centre,
21 Man Lok Street, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
-59-
I. SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION.
Not applicable.
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We do not believe that we have any material exposures to market risk associated with
activities in derivative financial instruments, other financial instruments, derivative commodity
instruments, and other market risk sensitive instruments, positions and transactions.
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
None.
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management, with the participation of
our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has performed an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures within the meaning of Rules 13a-15(e) of
the Exchange Act.
Based upon that evaluation, our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2007, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
-60-
(b) Managements annual report on internal control over financial reporting.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our management
evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on criteria
established in the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management has
concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2007.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Gruber & Company, LLC, has audited our
managements assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, as stated in its report, which appears on page F-2 of this Annual Report on Form
20-F.
(c) Attestation report of the registered public accounting firm.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Gruber & Company, LLC, has audited our
managements assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, as stated in its report, which appears on page F-2 of this Annual Report on Form
20-F.
(d) Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report on
Form 20-F that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 16. [RESERVED]
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
-61-
Our Board of Directors has determined that it considers Jin Wang as the audit committee
financial expert serving on our audit committee. Mr. Wang is an independent non-executive director
as defined in The Nasdaq Stock Markets listing standards.
ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our employees, including our chief
executive officer and our chief financial officer.
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
(a) Audit Fees.
Gruber & Company, LLC was our principal accountant for the audit of our financial statements
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007.
The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services
rendered by our principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements or services
that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or
engagements for those fiscal years were $200,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and
$210,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
The foregoing excludes our payments to Moores Rowland Mazars of $200,000 and KPMG of $400,000
for services rendered in connection with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
(b) Audit Related Fees.
No fees were billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by
our principal accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of
our financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item for the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2007.
(c) Tax Fees.
The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services
rendered by our principal accountants for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were $nil
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and $ nil for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
(d) All Other Fees.
-62-
No fees were billed in each of the last two fiscal years for products and services provided by
our principal accountant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this
Item for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007.
(e) Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.
To ensure continuing auditor objectivity and to safeguard the independence of our auditors,
our audit committee has determined a framework for the type and authorization of non-audit services
which our current accountant, Gruber & Company, LLC, may provide.
The audit committee has adopted policies for the pre-approval of specific services that may be
provided by our principal auditors. These policies are kept under review and amended as necessary
to meet the dual objectives of ensuring that we benefit in a cost effective manner from the
cumulative knowledge and experience of our auditors whilst also ensuring that the auditors maintain
the necessary degree of independence and objectivity.
Our audit committee approved the engagement of Gruber & Company, LLC as our principal
accountant to render audit and non-audit services before Gruber & Company, LLC was engaged by us.
All of the services described in each of paragraphs (b) through (d) of this Item were approved
by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(f). Not applicable.
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
Not applicable.
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
In September 2001, we announced a common stock repurchase program pursuant to which we may
repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock from time to time in the open market and in
negotiated transactions, including block transactions, and may be discontinued at any time without
prior notice.
We did not repurchase any of our shares of common stock during the fiscal year ended December
31, 2007.
-63-
PART III
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following financial statements, together with the report of the independent registered
public accounting firm Gruber & Company, LLC, for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
are being filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 20-F.
Consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007.
Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2007.
Consolidated statements of shareholders equity for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006
and 2007.
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007.
Notes to and forming part of the financial statements.
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the year ended December 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005
All other schedules are omitted, as required information is inapplicable or the information
is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.
-64-
LJ INTERNATIONAL INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations |
|
|
F-3 - F-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity and Comprehensive Income |
|
|
F-6 - F-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
|
|
F-8 - F-9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to and Forming Part of the Financial Statements |
|
|
F-10 - F-47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule II |
|
|
F-48 |
|
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of LJ International Inc.
In our opinion the consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive income and cash flows present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of LJ International Inc. and its subsidiaries at
December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and the results of their consolidated operations and their
consolidated cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In
addition, in our opinion, the financial statement Schedule II presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our
opinion, the Company maintained in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
The Companys management is responsible for these financial statements and the financial statement
Schedule II, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing under Item
15(b) Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting of the Annual Report on Form 20-F-2007. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the
financial statement Schedule II, and on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over
financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also
included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention of timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Gruber & Company, LLC
Gruber & Company, LLC
Lake Saint Louis, Missouri
May 23, 2008
F-2
LJ INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Operating revenue |
|
|
2 (c) |
|
|
|
152,037 |
|
|
|
123,791 |
|
|
|
99,646 |
|
Costs of goods sold (Exclusive of depreciation
shown separately below.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112,508 |
) |
|
|
(88,867 |
) |
|
|
(77,127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,529 |
|
|
|
34,924 |
|
|
|
22,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,399 |
) |
|
|
(23,114 |
) |
|
|
(15,488 |
) |
Net (loss) gain on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,095 |
) |
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(1,368 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,031 |
|
|
|
9,742 |
|
|
|
5,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
2 (c) |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Interest expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,103 |
) |
|
|
(3,258 |
) |
|
|
(1,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, minority interests
and extraordinary item |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,201 |
|
|
|
6,766 |
|
|
|
3,819 |
|
Income taxes expense |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
|
(1,403 |
) |
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interests and
extraordinary item |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
5,363 |
|
|
|
3,080 |
|
Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary item |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
|
|
3,060 |
|
Extraordinary gain on negative goodwill |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
|
|
4,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income used in computing basic earnings
per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
|
|
4,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares used in
calculating basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,064,253 |
|
|
|
17,390,093 |
|
|
|
13,438,578 |
|
Effect of dilutive potential ordinary shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,945 |
|
|
|
118,717 |
|
|
|
28,738 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
975,904 |
|
|
|
794,467 |
|
|
|
854,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares used in
calculating diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,289,102 |
|
|
|
18,303,277 |
|
|
|
14,321,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
LJ INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
2 (g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary item |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
Extraordinary item |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
2 (g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary item |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
Extraordinary item |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
LJ INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,951 |
|
|
|
5,863 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
9 (a) |
|
|
|
4,161 |
|
|
|
5,489 |
|
Trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
(December 31, 2007: US$1; December 31, 2006: US$30) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,194 |
|
|
|
23,894 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
2 (n) |
|
|
|
2,973 |
|
|
|
2,596 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
82,012 |
|
|
|
68,751 |
|
Prepayments and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,522 |
|
|
|
3,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,760 |
|
|
|
113,111 |
|
Properties held for lease, net |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8,460 |
|
|
|
8,412 |
|
Due from related parties |
|
|
16 (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,144 |
|
|
|
124,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
3,987 |
|
Capitalized lease obligation, current portion |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Letters of credit, gold loan and others |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
21,536 |
|
|
|
33,423 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,444 |
|
|
|
6,034 |
|
Trade payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,700 |
|
|
|
9,213 |
|
Accrued payroll and staff benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,686 |
|
|
|
2,043 |
|
Accrued expenses and other payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,434 |
|
|
|
5,509 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
Deferred taxation |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,974 |
|
|
|
62,977 |
|
Notes payable, non-current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
Capitalized lease obligation, non-current portion |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,309 |
|
|
|
64,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stocks, par value US$0.01 each,
Authorized - 100 million shares,
Issued 21,437,172 shares as of December 31, 2007 and
18,977,371 shares as of December 31, 2006 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,495 |
|
|
|
40,456 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,638 |
|
|
|
19,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,668 |
|
|
|
59,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,144 |
|
|
|
124,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
LJ INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Par |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
of shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
compensation |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 2(x)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
12,304,658 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
23,382 |
|
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
9,473 |
|
|
|
32,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,351 |
|
|
|
4,351 |
|
Exchange translation difference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options |
|
13(a)(ii) |
|
|
3,162,000 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
7,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,573 |
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants |
|
13(a)(ii) |
|
|
54,545 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
Compensation costs for warrants granted |
|
15(b)(ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
Compensation expense recognized during the year |
|
2(q) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
15,521,203 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
31,204 |
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
13,824 |
|
|
|
45,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
Unrealized holding gain on investment in
available-for-sale securities |
|
2(n) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock on private placement |
|
13(a)(iii) |
|
|
1,466,668 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
4,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options |
|
13(a)(iv) |
|
|
1,489,500 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants |
|
13(a)(iv) |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,740 |
|
Elimination of unearned compensation |
|
2(q) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation costs for warrants granted |
|
15(b)(ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
2(q) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
18,977,371 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
40,456 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,149 |
|
|
|
59,739 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
LJ INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Par |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
of shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
compensation |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 2(x)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
18,977,371 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
40,456 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,149 |
|
|
|
59,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
1,489 |
|
Unrealized holding gain on investment in
available-for-sale securities |
|
2(n) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options |
|
13(a)(v) |
|
|
1,897,000 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
8,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,504 |
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants |
|
13(a)(v) |
|
|
562,801 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,072 |
|
Compensation costs for warrants granted |
|
15(b)(ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
2(q) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
21,437,172 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
51,495 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,638 |
|
|
|
72,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
LJ INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
|
|
4,351 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
and properties held for lease |
|
|
3,095 |
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
Extraordinary gain on negative goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
88 |
|
Loss on disposal and write-off of property,
plant and equipment |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Reversal of doubtful debts |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Minority interests |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Compensation costs for warrants granted |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Compensation expenses recognized during the year |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
(8,607 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(13,261 |
) |
|
|
(12,810 |
) |
|
|
(12,060 |
) |
Prepayments and other current assets |
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
601 |
|
Due from related parties |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Trade payables |
|
|
9,487 |
|
|
|
(2,955 |
) |
|
|
1,883 |
|
Accrued expenses and other payables |
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
(854 |
) |
Income taxes payable and deferred taxation |
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
2,203 |
|
|
|
(6,200 |
) |
|
|
(14,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
Net cash inflow from acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
Purchase of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,496 |
) |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(3,139 |
) |
|
|
(4,183 |
) |
|
|
(2,869 |
) |
Proceeds on disposals of property, plant and
equipment |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,806 |
) |
|
|
(3,829 |
) |
|
|
(4,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
LJ INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in bank overdrafts |
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
1,421 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of shares upon exercise of
stock options |
|
|
8,504 |
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
|
|
7,573 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of share upon exercise of
stock warrants |
|
|
2,072 |
|
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of shares in private
placement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of amount due to related parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans acquired |
|
|
14,334 |
|
|
|
11,092 |
|
|
|
10,267 |
|
Repayment of loans |
|
|
(24,833 |
) |
|
|
(8,117 |
) |
|
|
(5,424 |
) |
Repayment of capitalized lease obligation |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Letter of credit and factoring |
|
|
(5,691 |
) |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
6,464 |
|
Proceeds from sale of derivatives net of
retirement of embedded derivatives |
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(1,309 |
) |
|
|
11,096 |
|
|
|
20,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, as of beginning of year |
|
|
5,863 |
|
|
|
4,796 |
|
|
|
3,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, as of end of year |
|
|
4,951 |
|
|
|
5,863 |
|
|
|
4,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,103 |
|
|
|
3,258 |
|
|
|
1,991 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment under
capitalized leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-9
1. |
|
NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
|
|
LJ International Inc. (LJI), its subsidiaries and variable interest entities (VIEs)
(collectively referred as the Company) are principally involved in the design, manufacture,
marketing, sale of precious and color gemstones as well as diamond jewelry. While the
Company is based in Hong Kong, its manufacturing operations are in the Peoples Republic of
China (PRC) and most of its sales are currently in the United States of America (US). The
retail shops are located in the PRC, Hong Kong and Macau. The Company also owns certain
commercial and residential properties located in Hong Kong, which are held primarily for
lease. |
|
2. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
(a) |
|
Basis of accounting |
|
|
|
|
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with US generally accepted
accounting principles (US GAAP). |
|
|
(b) |
|
Principles of consolidation and goodwill |
|
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements include the financial information of LJI, its
subsidiaries and VIEs for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. The results of
subsidiaries and VIEs acquired or disposed of during the year are consolidated from or
to their effective dates of acquisition or disposal respectively. All material
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation. |
|
|
|
|
The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46(R)). FIN 46(R) requires certain
variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the
entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a
controlling financial interest nor do not have sufficient equity at risk for the
entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support
from other parties. |
|
|
|
|
VIEs are owned by individuals, who are acting as agents for the Company.
The Company does not have any ownership interest in VIEs. LJI is incorporated in
the BVI and is considered a foreign entity under the PRC laws. Prior to 2006, due
to the restrictions on foreign ownership on the retail business of jewelry, the
Company, through loans to the agents, established VIEs to carry out the retail
business of jewelry in the PRC. Pursuant to various agreements entered into
between the Company, the owners of VIEs and VIEs, the Company generally has control
of VIEs, absorbs majority of expected losses and receives majority of residual
return of VIEs. The Company is therefore considered the primary beneficiary of
VIEs. Accordingly, the results of VIEs have been consolidated in the financial
statements of the Company since they become VIEs of the Company. With the |
F-10
2. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
|
|
relaxation of the restrictions on foreign ownership on retail business, the agents of
one of the VIE have transferred the ownership of the VIE back to the Company in
September 2006, the agents of another VIE are in the process of transferring the
ownership of the VIE back to the Company. |
|
|
|
The application of the consolidation provisions of FIN 46(R) resulted in an
increase in assets and an increase in liabilities as of December 31, 2007 by
US$5,632 and US$5,682 respectively and an increase in assets and an increase in
liabilities as of December 31, 2006 by US$3,098 and US$1,358 respectively and
increase in net loss of US$473 and US$580 and US$1,248 for each of three years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 respectively. |
|
|
|
Goodwill represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price over the fair value of
the net assets acquired in a purchase businesses combination. Goodwill is reviewed for
impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of FASB Statement No.
142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step
test. Under the first step, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared with its
carrying value (including goodwill). If the fair value of the reporting unit is less
than its carrying value, an indication of goodwill impairment exists for the reporting
unit and the enterprise must perform step two of the impairment test (measurement).
Under step two, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount
of the reporting units goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill. The
implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the
reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations. The residual fair value after this
allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. Fair value of the
reporting unit is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis. If the fair value
of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, step two does not need to be
performed. |
|
|
|
The Company performed its annual impairment review of goodwill, and
resulting in US$Nil in 2007 and 2006, US$1,291 included in statement of operations
as an extraordinary item in 2005. |
|
(c) |
|
Revenue recognition |
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue represents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Product sales |
|
|
161,375 |
|
|
|
128,118 |
|
Services income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,130 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,501 |
|
|
|
132,372 |
|
Less: Sales return allowance |
|
|
(9,464 |
) |
|
|
(8,581 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,037 |
|
|
|
123,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-11
2. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
|
(i) |
|
Product sales |
|
|
|
|
Product sales represent the invoiced value of products sold, net of value added
taxes (VAT). The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of products when the
following criteria are met: 1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists (sales
agreements and customer purchase orders are used to determine the existence of an
arrangement); 2) delivery of the product has occurred and risks and benefits of
ownership have been transferred, which is when the product is received by the
customer at its or a designated location in accordance with the sales terms; 3) the
sales price is fixed or determinable; and 4) collectibility is probable. |
|
|
|
|
In the PRC, VAT at a general rate of 17% on invoice amount is collected on behalf of
tax authorities in respect of the sales of products and is not recorded as revenue.
VAT collected from customers, net of VAT paid for purchases, is recorded as a
liability in the consolidated balance sheets until it is paid to the authorities. |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Service income |
|
|
|
|
Service income represents services performed for improving and upgrading gemstones
into saleable quality. On August 11, 2006 the Company entered into a Joint
Collaboration Agreement (the Agreement) with an Agent who is not a related party.
The Company was responsible for and paid the cost of servicing and upgrading
performed to bring gemstones to the form of fine jewelry ready for sale. |
|
|
|
|
The servicing income in the amount of $4,130 was included in servicing income on the
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006. |
|
|
(iii) |
|
Rental income |
|
|
|
|
Rental income receivable under operating lease is recognized in the consolidated
statements of income in equal installments over the period covered by the
lease term. |
|
|
(iv) |
|
Other income represents: |
|
|
|
|
Interest income is accrued on a time proportion basis on the principal outstanding
and at the interest rate applicable. |
|
(d) |
|
Sales return reserve |
|
|
|
|
The Company has allowed sales returns and its sales generally include specified return
policy for certain customers. The Company reserves for sales returns as a reduction of
revenue at the time the operating revenue is recognized based on historical sales return
experience and agreed terms of sales return stated in the contracts with certain
specific customers. |
F-12
2. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
|
(e) |
|
Shipping and handling costs |
|
|
|
|
The shipping and handling costs are included in cost of goods sold. Shipping and
handling costs were US$2,580, US$2,991 and US$3,135 for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005 respectively. |
|
|
(f) |
|
Advertising and promotion costs |
|
|
|
|
Advertising and promotion expenses are generally expensed when incurred. Advertising
costs were US$2,242, US$1,321 and US$1,092 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005 respectively. |
|
|
(g) |
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
The calculation of basic earnings per share is based on net income for the year
attributable to shareholders and on the weighted average number of ordinary shares
outstanding during the year. |
|
|
|
|
The calculation of diluted earnings per share is based on net income for the year
attributable to shareholders and on the weighted average number of ordinary shares
outstanding during the year, adjusted for the effects of all dilutive
potential ordinary shares. The dilutive effect of convertible securities is reflected in diluted earnings
per share by application of the if-converted method. 329,334 warrants were not included
in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2007
because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the year. |
|
|
(h) |
|
Fair value of financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
The financial instruments used by the Company in the normal course of business,
including cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, trade payables, notes payable
and letter of credit, gold and other loans, have fair values which approximate their
recorded value as the financial instruments are either short term in nature or carry
interest rate that approximate market rates. |
|
|
(i) |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear
interest. Amounts collected on trade receivables are included in net cash provided
by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company
maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses inherent in its
trade receivable portfolio and purchases trade credit insurance to cover the risk
of collectibilities. In establishing the required allowance, management considers
historical losses, current receivables aging, and existing industry and national
economic data. The Company reviews its allowance for doubtful accounts regularly.
Past due balances over 120 days and over a specified amount are reviewed
individually for collectibility. All other balances are reviewed on a pooled basis
by aging of such balances. Account balances are charged off against the allowance
after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is
considered remote. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure
related to its customers, except for outstanding bills discounted with banks (see
Note 9), that are subject to recourse for non-payment. |
F-13
2. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
|
(j) |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and market. Cost, which comprises all costs
of purchase and, where applicable, costs of conversion and other costs that have
been incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition,
including inbound freight charges, purchasing and receiving cost, inspection costs
and internal transfer costs, is calculated using the weighted average costing
method. Estimated losses on inventories represent reserves for obsolescence,
excess quantities, irregulars and slow moving inventory, and which are charged to
cost of goods sold. In case of inventory which have been written down below cost at
the close of a fiscal year, such reduced amount forms a new cost basis that
subsequently cannot be marked up based on changes in underlying facts and
circumstances. The Company estimates the loss/write-down on the basis of its
assessment of the inventorys net realizable value based upon current market
conditions and historical experience. |
|
|
|
|
Effective January 1, 2005, the Company changed its method of valuing its inventory from
the first-in, first-out method to the monthly weighted average costing method.
Management believes the weighted average costing method results in a better
matching of current costs with current revenues and minimizes the effect of price
level changes on inventory valuation. The cumulative effect of this accounting
change for years prior to 2005 and the effects of retroactive application of the
weighted average costing method to prior years are immaterial. The effect of the
change in 2005 was to increase net income of the Company by US$35. |
|
|
(k) |
|
Properties held for lease |
|
|
|
|
Properties held for lease are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation, which
is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets. Rental income from these properties is recorded on a monthly basis in
accordance with the lease terms. |
F-14
2. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
|
(l) |
|
Property, plant and equipment (PPE) and depreciation |
|
|
|
|
PPE are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment
loss, and include expenditure that substantially increases the useful lives of existing
assets. Maintenance and repairs are charged to current operations as incurred. Upon
sale, retirement, or other disposition of these assets, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation and accumulated impairment loss are removed from the respective accounts,
and any gain or loss is included in the consolidated statement of operations. Plant and
equipment under capital leases are stated at the present value of minimum lease
payments. |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation on PPE is calculated by using the straight-line method (after taking
into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives
of the related assets at the following annual rates: |
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold land and buildings |
|
2% or over the unexpired term of leases |
Leasehold improvement |
|
shorter of 10% or the unexpired term of leases |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
20% to 50% |
Plant and machinery |
|
|
|
10% |
Motor vehicles |
|
10% to 20% |
|
|
|
Depreciation on PPE attributable to manufacturing activities is capitalized as part
of inventory, and expensed to cost of goods sold as inventory is sold. Depreciation
related to abnormal amounts from idle capacity is charged to cost of goods sold for the
period incurred. Total depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 were US$ 3,095, US$2,039 and US$1,368 respectively. |
|
|
(m) |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
|
|
|
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 144 (SFAS 144), Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets, long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment, are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived
asset be tested for possible impairment, the Company first compares undiscounted
cash flows expected to be generated by an asset to the carrying value of the asset.
If the carrying value of the long-lived asset is not recoverable on an
undiscounted cash flow basis, an impairment is recognized to the extent that the
carrying value exceeds it fair value. Fair value is determined through various
valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values
and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary. |
F-15
2. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
|
(n) |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
The Company classifies its investment in capital guaranteed fund as available-for-sale
securities. The fund is restricted and secures obligations under trade credit banking
facilities. It is carried at market value with a corresponding recognition of net
unrealized holding gain or loss (net of tax) as a separate component of shareholders
equity until realized. Unrealized losses are charged against net earnings when a
decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary. Gains and losses on
sales of securities are computed on a specific identification basis. Available-for-sale
securities comprise: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Quoted capital guaranteed fund, at cost |
|
|
2,496 |
|
|
|
2,496 |
|
Gross unrealized gains |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
2,973 |
|
|
|
2,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(o) |
|
Gold loans and embedded derivative |
|
|
|
|
Gold loans are commodity-indexed debts with an embedded derivative. The loan is
recorded at its original amount and adjusted for additional borrowings and repayments.
The embedded derivative component was valued at fair value, considering the market price
of gold, volatility of gold and the time value of money. Any changes in fair value of
embedded derivative are included in the consolidated statement of operations and an
asset or liability representing the value of the embedded derivative portion is included
in the consolidated balance sheet. |
|
|
(p) |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into derivative contracts to hedge the future settlement of gold
loans in order to mitigate the risk of market price fluctuations. They consist of
contracts that are used to hedge against changes in the fair value of gold price when
the Company settles the gold loans. |
|
|
|
|
The derivative contracts and the embedded derivative are valued at fair value. Changes
in fair value of derivative contracts are included in the consolidated statement of
operations, net of changes in fair value of embedded derivative set out in note 2(o). |
F-16
2. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
|
(q) |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment, (SFAS 123(R)) requires the Company to measure the cost of employee services
received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair
value of the award. The Company records the cost as expense over the offering period
and vesting term in connection with compensation expense for stock-based employee
compensation plans. |
|
|
|
|
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company began recording compensation expense for
stock-based employee compensation plans in accordance with SFAS 123(R) as interpreted
by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. The Company adopted the modified prospective
transition method provided for under SFAS 123(R), and consequently has not
retroactively adjusted results from prior periods. Under this transition method,
compensation expense for stock-based employee compensation plans recognized for the
year ended December 31, 2006 now includes estimated expense for the portion of stock
options vesting in the period for options granted prior to, but not vested as of
January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the
original provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123). |
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, the Company has three stock-based employee compensation plans,
details of which are set out in note 15(a). |
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company has granted 1,500,000 stock
options to the employees. The fair value of these options was estimated on the date of
grant using a Binomial pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
Expected stock price volatility |
|
|
33.2 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.90 |
% |
Expected life of options |
|
1 month |
|
|
|
The weighted average fair value per option granted during the years ended December 31,
2007 was US$0.22. |
|
|
|
|
Prior to 1 January, 2006, the Company records compensation expense for stock-based
employee compensation plans using the intrinsic value method pursuant to APB Opinion
No. 25 in which compensation expense is measured as the excess of the market price of
the stock over the exercise price of the plan on the measurement date. Compensation
expense is charged to income as when incurred if the benefit was fully vested at the
date of grant or is recognized proportionately over the vesting period. Unearned
compensation is shown separately as a reduction of the shareholders equity. |
F-17
2. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
|
(q) |
|
Stock-based compensation (Continued) |
|
|
|
In 2004, the Company recorded an unearned compensation of US$48 in the shareholders
equity in relation to the option to purchase 150,000 shares of the common stock of the
Company granted to an employee, for which the exercise price was below the market price
of the underlying stock at the date of grant. This amount is accrued proportionately
as compensation expense over the vesting period. For each of the two years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company recognized compensation expense of US$18 and
US$11 respectively in its statement of operations. Following the adoption of SFAS
123(R), the unearned compensation has been eliminated against the additional paid-in
capital. Other than the above, the exercise price of the Companys incentive stock
options was same as or higher than the market price of the underlying stock on the date
of grant, no compensation expense was recognized for these stock options granted to
employees. |
|
|
|
|
Had compensation expense for the same stock options been determined based on the fair
value on the date of grant and been amortized over the period from the date of grant to
the date that the award is vested, consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the
Companys net income and earnings per share would have been reported as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
Income before extraordinary item |
|
|
3,060 |
|
Add : Stock-based employee compensation
expenses included in reported net
income, net of tax |
|
|
18 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation expenses determined
under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax |
|
|
(2,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma income before extraordinary item |
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary item |
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
2. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
|
(q) |
|
Stock-based compensation (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
Basic earnings per share, as reported: |
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary item |
|
|
0.23 |
|
Extraordinary item |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share, as reported: |
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary item |
|
|
0.21 |
|
Extraordinary item |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share, pro forma: |
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary item |
|
|
0.06 |
|
Extraordinary item |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share, pro forma: |
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary item |
|
|
0.06 |
|
Extraordinary item |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of these options was estimated on the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
Expected stock price volatility |
|
|
52 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.37 |
% |
Expected life of options |
|
2 years |
|
|
|
The weighted average fair value per option granted during the year ended December 31,
2005 was US$0.70. |
F-19
2. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
|
(r) |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry
forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences
are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date. The Company provides a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce
deferred tax assets to their estimated realizable value. |
|
|
(s) |
|
Foreign currencies |
|
|
|
|
LJIs functional currency is United States dollars. Transactions denominated in
currencies other than U.S. dollars are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate
prevailing at the dates of transactions. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses
are included in the consolidated statement of operations. The assets and liabilities of
subsidiaries whose functional currencies are other than U.S. dollars, are translated at
the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and related revenue and expenses
are translated at average exchange rates during the year. Related transaction gains or
losses are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss). |
|
|
|
|
The aggregate transaction loss included in determining net income were US$453,
US$465 and US$273 for each of the three years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
respectively. |
F-20
2. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
|
(t) |
|
Cash equivalents and Pledged Bank Deposits |
|
|
|
|
Cash consists of cash on hand, cash in bank accounts and interest-bearing savings
accounts. Cash deposits that are restricted as to withdrawal or pledged as security, are
disclosed separately on the face of the consolidated balance sheet, and not included in
the cash total for the purpose of the consolidated statements of cash flow. |
|
|
(u) |
|
Uses of estimates |
|
|
|
|
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements, in accordance
with US GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the consolidated financials statements and accompanying notes.
Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the carrying
amount of property, plant and equipment and goodwill; valuation allowance for
receivables, inventories and deferred income tax asset; valuation of derivative
instruments; valuation of share-based compensation. Actual results could differ
from those estimates. |
|
|
(v) |
|
Related parties |
|
|
|
|
Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability, directly or
indirectly, to control the other party, or exercise significant influence over the other
party in making financial and operating decisions. Parties are also considered to be
related if they are subject to common control or common significant influence. |
|
|
(w) |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
The Directors of the Company have never declared or paid any cash dividends on the
Companys capital stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable
future. The ability to pay dividends depends upon receipt of dividends or other
payments from subsidiaries and other holdings and investments. In addition, the
operating subsidiaries from time to time may be subject to restrictions on their ability
to make distributions to the Company, including as a result of restrictive covenants in
loan agreements, restrictions on the conversion of local currency into US dollars or
other currencies and other regulatory restrictions. Currently, none of the subsidiaries
has such restriction during the periods presented except for the covenants as set out in
note 9 to the financial statements. |
F-21
2. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
|
(x) |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
The Company reports comprehensive income in accordance with SFAS No. 130 Reporting
Comprehensive Income. Accumulated other comprehensive gain represents exchange
translation adjustments and unrealized holding gains on investment, and is included in
the shareholders equity section of the balance sheet. |
|
|
(y) |
|
New accounting pronouncements |
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157
(SFAS No. 157), Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, provides a framework
for measuring fair value, and expands the disclosures required for fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require fair
value measurements and does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is
effective for fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. We are required to adopt
SFAS No. 157 beginning on January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 is required to be applied
prospectively, except for certain financial instruments. Any transition adjustment will
be recognized as an adjustment to opening retained earnings in the year of adoption. In
November 2007, the FASB proposed a one-year deferral of SFAS No. 157s fair value
measurement requirements for non-financial assets and liabilities that are not required
or permitted to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company does not
expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have a material impact on its financial
statements. |
|
|
|
|
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
159 (SFAS No. 159), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. SFAS No. 159 allows entities to choose, at specified election dates, to measure
eligible financial assets and liabilities at fair value that are not otherwise required
to be measured at fair value. If a company elects the fair value option for an eligible
item, changes in that items fair value in subsequent reporting periods must be
recognized in current earnings. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements designed to draw comparison between entities that elect
different measurement attributes for similar assets and liabilities. The Company does
not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have a material impact on its financial
statements. |
|
|
|
|
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
141R (SFAS No. 141R), Business Combinations, which is a revision of SFAS No. 141,
Business Combinations. This statement establishes principles and requirements for how an
acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree;
recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from
a bargain purchase; and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the
financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business
combination. |
F-22
2. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
|
(y) |
|
New accounting pronouncements (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
This new standard is effective prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the annual reporting period beginning
on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 141R on its consolidated financial
statements. |
|
|
|
|
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
160 (SFAS No. 160), Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. SFAS
No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net
income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest, changes in a
parents ownership interest and the valuation of retained non-controlling equity
investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160 also establishes
disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of
the parent and the interests of the non-controlling owners. This new standard is
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on
or after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the
adoption of SFAS No. 160 on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161
(SFAS No. 161), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities An
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures on
derivative and hedging activities by requiring objectives to be disclosed for using
derivative instruments in terms of underlying risk and accounting designation. This
statement requires disclosures on the need of using derivative instruments, accounting
of derivative instruments and related hedged items, if any, under SFAS No. 133 and the
effect of such instruments and related hedge items, if any, on the financial position,
financial performance and cash flows. This new statement is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the
adoption of SFAS No. 161 on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162
(SFAS No. 162), The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The new
standard is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent
framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing
financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles for non-governmental entities. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days
following the SECs approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments
to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of
SFAS No. 162 on its consolidated financial statements. |
F-23
3. |
|
ACQUISITIONS |
|
|
|
On January 1, 2005, the Company paid US$2,828 for new issuance of 3,900 common stock of
Goldleaves International Limited (GIL), a company whose principal activities are the
manufacturing and trading of rough and pre-formed gemstones, in which the Company had 20%
equity interests and is classified as investment securities as of December 31, 2004. The
Company then became the major stockholder holding 98% equity interest in GIL, which became a
subsidiary of the Company. The directors of the Company consider such acquisition would
enhance the Company by forward and backward vertical integration. |
|
|
|
Details of the 78% share of identifiable assets and liabilities by the Company at the date
of acquisition are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
Net assets acquired: |
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
119 |
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
490 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
5,657 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
2,674 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
122 |
|
Trade payables |
|
|
(572 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other payables |
|
|
(4,221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,269 |
|
|
Negative goodwill arising from acquisition |
|
|
(1,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration |
|
|
2,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None of the amount of goodwill is expected to be taxable or tax deductible. |
|
|
|
Negative goodwill was arisen from the acquisition of GIL, US$150 of which was directly
written off against the Companys share of properties, plants and equipments acquired. The
remaining balance of US$1,291 was included in statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2005 as an extraordinary item. |
F-24
|
(a) |
|
Concentrations of credit risks |
|
|
|
|
Details of major customers from which the Company derived operating revenue are shown
in note 18(a). |
|
|
|
|
Credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting
date if counterparties failed completely to perform as contracted. Concentrations of
credit risk (whether on or off balance sheet) that arise from financial instruments
exist for groups of customers or counterparties when there are similar economic
characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be
similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. The major concentration
of credit risk arises from the Companys receivables. Even though the Company does
have major customers, it does not consider itself to be exposed to significant credit
risk with regards to collection of the related receivables. Historical losses have not
been significant. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Country risks |
|
|
|
|
The Company may also be exposed to certain risks as a result of its manufacturing
operation being located in the PRC and its properties held for lease in Hong Kong which
are not typically associated with companies operating in North America and Western
Europe. These include risks associated with, among others, the political, economic and
legal environments and foreign currency exchange. The Companys results may be
adversely affected by changes in the political and social conditions in the PRC, and by
changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations,
anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and
methods of taxation, among other things. The Companys management believe these risks
not to be significant. There can be no assurance, however, that changes in political,
social and other conditions will not result in any adverse impact. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Cash and time deposits |
|
|
|
|
The Company maintains majority of its cash balances and investments in time deposits
with various banks and financial institutions in Hong Kong. In common with local
practice, such amounts are not insured or otherwise protected should the financial
institutions be unable to meet their liabilities. There has been no history of credit
losses. |
F-25
5. |
|
INVENTORIES |
|
|
|
Inventories consist of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
42,052 |
|
|
|
44,001 |
|
Work-in-progress |
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
2,417 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
37,360 |
|
|
|
22,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,012 |
|
|
|
68,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
|
PROPERTIES HELD FOR LEASE, NET |
|
|
|
The Company owns leasehold land and buildings in Hong Kong and leases them out for lease
term of 2 years. Properties held for lease consists of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Leasehold land and buildings |
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
(691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company pledged all properties held for lease as collateral for general banking
facilities granted to the Company as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 (see note 9). |
|
|
|
The future aggregate minimum rental receivables under non-cancellable operating leases are
as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
2008 |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
2009 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
7. |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET |
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Leasehold land and buildings |
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
2,405 |
|
Leasehold improvement |
|
|
8,610 |
|
|
|
6,591 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
5,342 |
|
Plant and machinery |
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
Motor vehicles |
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,650 |
|
|
|
17,547 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(11,190 |
) |
|
|
(9,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,460 |
|
|
|
8,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company pledged leasehold land and buildings with net book values of US$1,318 and
US$1,385 as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 respectively as collateral for general banking
facilities granted to the Company (see note 9). |
8. |
|
GOODWILL, NET |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, goodwill is attributed to wholesale segment of the acquisition of a
jewelry company in 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Carrying value, beginning of year |
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
Impairment loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value, end of year |
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company conducts annual impairment tests. The testing included the determination of
each reporting units fair value using the market multiples and discount cash flow analysis.
No goodwill impairment charge was necessary for the year ended December 31, 2007. The
accumulated amortization and impairment losses were US$869 and US$869 as of December 31,
2007 and 2006 respectively. |
F-27
9. |
|
BANKING FACILITIES AND OTHER LOANS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Bank overdrafts |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
3,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit, gold and others: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
12,108 |
|
|
|
19,562 |
|
Factoring |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
4,545 |
|
|
|
2,782 |
|
Gold loan |
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
4,883 |
|
|
|
11,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,536 |
|
|
|
33,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys banking facilities are collateralized by leasehold land and buildings (see
notes 6 and 7), restricted cash deposits, factored receivables, and personal guarantees of
and properties owned by a director (see note 16(b)). |
|
|
|
The material provisions of indentures relating to the Companys various banking facility
agreements contain covenants pertaining to (i) maintenance of the tangible net worth of LJI
and one of its subsidiaries amounting to US$50,000 and US$4,487 respectively; and (ii)
cross-default provisions of the subsidiary in the event of default in aggregate of at least
US$10,000 under separate loan facilities. In the event of default, the bank would at its
discretion to cancel the facilities and demand immediate repayment of all principal,
interest, fees and other amount outstanding. |
|
(a) |
|
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had various revolving bank facilities of
overdrafts, letters of credit and factoring facilities granted by banks, amounting to
US$4,141, US$20,526 and US$18,431 respectively. |
|
|
|
|
The bank overdrafts are denominated in Hong Kong dollars, bear interest at the
floating commercial bank lending rates in Hong Kong, which ranged from 4.4% to 8%
per annum as of December 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
The factoring facilities granted are limited to the extent of accounts receivable
collateralized to the banks. |
|
|
|
|
Under the banking facilities arrangements, the Company is required to maintain
certain cash balances and investment in capital guaranteed fund based on the amount
of facilities granted. The cash balances are reflected as restricted cash in the
balance sheet. |
F-28
9. |
|
BANKING FACILITIES AND OTHER LOANS (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
The Company also had term loans classified under notes payable which are
related to the Companys leasehold land and buildings (see note 7). These loans
aggregated to US$5,201 as of December 31, 2007. The expected maturities of these notes
payable are within 1-5 years. Interest charges on these loans ranged from 5.6% to 8.8%
per annum as of December 31, 2007. |
|
|
(c) |
|
The Company had outstanding loans to purchase 11.15oz of gold as of December
31, 2007 with the related balances being US$4,883. These loans are due within the
following year, however, have been historically renewed. These loans bear interest at
3.1% to 3.3% per annum as of December 31, 2007 and can be repaid in cash at the current
exchange rate of gold any time prior to maturity. |
|
|
|
|
The weighted average interest rate for the year ended December 31,
2007 and 2006 were 5.5% and 4.9% per annum respectively. |
10. |
|
INCOME TAXES |
|
|
|
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets
and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating losses and tax credit carry
forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected
to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to
be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. |
|
|
|
The Company is subject to income taxes on an entity basis on income arising in or derived
from the tax jurisdiction in which it is domiciled and operates. Income tax expense
comprises of the following: |
F-29
10. |
|
INCOME TAXES (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Current taxes arising in foreign
subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year |
|
|
(1,525 |
) |
|
|
(1,248 |
) |
|
|
(595 |
) |
Under provision in prior years |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current tax |
|
|
(1,720 |
) |
|
|
(1,320 |
) |
|
|
(672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes arising in foreign
subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes expense |
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
|
(1,403 |
) |
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation to the expected statutory tax rate in Hong Kong of 17.5% (2006 and 2005:
17.5%) is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
Statutory rate |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
Tax effect of net operating losses |
|
|
43.8 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
Non taxable profits, net |
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
Others |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective rate |
|
|
53.4 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets
and liabilities are as follows: |
F-30
10. |
|
INCOME TAXES (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss |
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
|
4,099 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Others |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,078 |
|
|
|
4,210 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(4,967 |
) |
|
|
(4,099 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated tax allowance |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
Others |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation
of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become
deductible. The increase in valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2007 was
US$868; for December 31, 2006 and 2005, there were (decrease) increase in valuation
allowance amounted to (US$1,049) and US$2,237 respectively. |
|
|
|
Based on the history of the Companys profitability, management believes that it is more
likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of the deferred tax assets of
US$111 and US$111, net of valuation allowances as of December 31, 2007 and 2006. |
|
11. |
|
LEASE |
|
|
|
The Company is obligated under capital leases covering certain motor vehicles and
office equipment that expire at various dates during the next five years. At December 31,
2007 and 2006, the gross amount of motor vehicles and office equipment and related
accumulated amortization recorded under capital leases were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Motor vehicles |
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
Less accumulated amortization |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
11. |
|
LEASE (Continued) |
|
|
|
Amortization of assets held under capital leases is included with depreciation expenses. |
|
|
|
The Company leases certain of its office and factory premises under various
operating leases which the rent payables are charged to statements of operations on a
straight-line basis over the term of the relevant leases including any periods of free
rent. In addition to the future minimum lease payments, the terms of the leases in
respect of the retail shops in the PRC and Hong Kong provide for the payment of
contingent rentals based on a percentage of sales in excess of a stipulated amount.
Rental expenses for operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 consisted of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Minimum rentals |
|
|
5,486 |
|
|
|
3,222 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
Contingent rentals |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
6,208 |
|
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
Future minimum capital lease payments under capitalized leases and non-cancellable
operating leases are approximately as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Capitalized |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Capitalized |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
leases |
|
|
leases |
|
|
leases |
|
|
leases |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
2008 |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
1,741 |
|
2009 |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
2010 |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future
minimum lease
payments |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
3,299 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
4,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Amount
representing
interest (at rates
ranging from 0% to
4.95%) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of
net minimum capital
lease payments |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less current
instatements of
obligations under
capital leases |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under
capital leases,
excluding current
instalments |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
11. |
|
LEASE (Continued) |
|
|
|
The Company leases certain of its office and quarters from related party with two years
lease terms expiring in 2008 and 2009. Rental expenses for operating leases paid to related
party are included in the data presented above. Total rent expense associated with these
leases was US$245, US$227 and US$150 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
respectively. |
|
12. |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
(a) |
|
Commitments |
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had capital expenditure commitments of US$9. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company provided guarantee in respect of
bank mortgage loans granted to a director, Mr. Yih Yu Chuan to the extent of US$79,
US$158 and US$237 respectively. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Legal Proceedings |
|
|
|
|
Securities Litigation. In September 2007, several shareholder class actions were
filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California
against the Company and certain officers and directors of the Company, entitled Apple
v. LJ International Inc., et al. (No. 07-06076), Cooper v. LJ International, Inc., et
al. (No. 07/06213), and Lieben v. LJ International Inc., et. al. (No. 07-06216). On
February 8, 2008, the judge to whom the cases were referred consolidated the cases
and appointed lead plaintiff and lead counsel. On April 8, 2008, the lead plaintiff
filed an amended and consolidated complaint (the Complaint.) |
|
|
|
|
The Complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. It seeks an
unspecified amount of damages on behalf of all persons who purchased LJ common stock
during the period from February 15, 2007, to September 6, 2007 (the Class Period).
The Complaint alleges that the Companys February 15, 2007 press release, which
provided financial guidance for the Companys fourth quarter and year-end 2006 net
income and earnings, contained materially false and misleading statements.
Specifically, paragraph 10 of the Complaint alleges that the press release failed to
disclose known uncertainties, such as applicable tax provisions, that had material,
adverse effects on LJs 2006 fourth quarter and full year earnings and net income.
The Complaint alleges that the defendants overstated the Companys fiscal 2006
financial results, and thereby artificially inflated the market price of LJs common
stock throughout the Class Period. |
|
|
|
|
On May 27, 2008, the Company (the only defendant served with the Complaint) moved to
dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. |
F-33
12. |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued) |
|
(c) |
|
Legal proceedings (Continued) |
|
|
|
At this time, the Company is unable to form a professional judgment as to whether
unfavorable outcomes are either probable or remote. |
|
|
|
|
Derivative Litigation. Two purported shareholder derivative lawsuits, Vaughn v.
Yih, et al. (Los Angeles Superior Court No. BC 378903) and Cooke v. Yih, et al.
(Los Angeles Superior Court No. BC 380214), were filed in California in Los Angeles
County Superior Court on October 10 and November 5, 2007, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
The complaints in the derivative actions allege, among other things, that various
officers and directors of the Company caused the Company to issue a series of press
releases, Securities and Exchange Commission filings, and other statements that
significantly overstated the Companys business prospects and financial results.
They further allege that, as a result of these statements, the Companys share price
traded at artificially inflated levels, and that defendants actions led to a delay
in the release of the Companys financial statements for the fiscal fourth quarter
of 2006 and the fiscal first quarter of 2007. The plaintiffs purport to state causes
of action for breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, and unjust
enrichment. By their complaints, they seek among other relief, unspecified damages
to be paid to the Company, corporate governance reforms, and equitable and
injunctive relief, including restitution and the creation of a constructive trust. |
|
|
|
|
On May 9, 2009, the court in the Vaughn action sustained the defendants demurrer
without leave to amend on the ground that the plaintiff failed to obtain the
required leave from the High Court of the British Virgin Islands to file the
derivative action. The Vaughn action was dismissed pursuant to the order sustaining
the demurrer. On May 15, 2008, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal from the order
of dismissal. |
|
|
|
|
In May 2008, the Cooke action was reassigned to the same judge that presided over
the Vaughn action. The Company anticipates that the court will set a status
conference in due course. |
|
|
|
|
At this time, the Company is unable to form a professional judgment as to whether
unfavorable outcomes are either probable or remote. |
|
|
|
|
Shao v. Yih, et al. On October 28, 2007, the former chief executive officer of
Lorenzo USA, Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of LJ), sued LJ, Lorenzo USA, Inc., and
LJs Chief Executive Officer Yu Chuan Yih in Los Angeles Superior Court, Shao v,
Yih, et al., Case No. BC379851. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants wrongfully
refused to honor his valid exercise of options for the purchase of LJ stock. On
April 25, 2008, the parties agreed to settle the dispute at mediation. A Request for
Dismissal was filed in May 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Besides the above-mentioned legal proceedings, the Company is exposed to certain asserted
and unasserted potential claims. There can be no assurance that, with respect to
potential claims made against the Company, the Company could resolve such claims under terms and
conditions that would not have a material adverse effect on its
business, its
liquidity or financial results. Periodically, the Company reviews the status of each
significant matter and assesses its potential financial exposure. If the potential
loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and a range of
possible losses can be estimated, the Company then accrues a liability for the estimated
loss. Any liability for estimated loss is based on the criteria in SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies. Legal proceedings are subject to uncertainties,
and the outcomes are difficult to predict. Because of such uncertainties, accruals
are based only on the best information available at the time. As additional
information becomes available, the Company reassesses the potential liability related to
pending claims and litigation and may revise estimate. Presently, no accrual has
been estimated under SFAS No. 5 for potential losses that may or may not arise
from the current lawsuits in which the Company is involved. Accruals include billings for
legal services performed to date and expected to be performed in the future in
connection with the matters described above. |
F-34
13. |
|
COMMON STOCK AND WARRANTS OTHER THAN STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
(i) In September 2004, the Company completed a private placement of 1,614,082
shares of common stock and 484,221 warrants (note 13(b)(i)) at a price of US$2.20
per share. The Company sold all of the shares and the placement raised US$2,746
after underwriting discounts and placement costs.
(ii) During the year ended December 31, 2005, warrants to purchase 54,545 shares of
common stock (note 13(b)) and 3,162,000 stock options (note 15(a)) were exercised.
A total of 3,216,545 shares of common stock of the Company were issued accordingly.
(iii) In September 2006, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement
with certain institutional investors for the issuance of shares of common stock and
warrants to purchase shares of common stock. The Company sold to the investors an
aggregate of 1,466,668 units at a purchase price of $3.75 per unit, each unit
consisting of one share of common stock and a short-term warrant and a long-term
warrant (note 13(b)(ii)).
(iv) During the year ended December 31, 2006, warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of
common stock (note 15(b)(ii)) and 1,489,500 stock options (note 15(a)) were
exercised. A total of 1,989,500 shares of common stock of the Company were issued
accordingly.
(v) During the year ended December 31, 2007 warrants to purchase 562,801 shares of
common stock (note 13(b)) and 1,897,000 stock options (note 15(a)) were exercised. A
total of 2,459,801 shares of common stock of the Company were issued accordingly.
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had 21,437,172 shares of common stock issued.
|
(b) |
|
Warrants other than stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
warrants |
|
|
warrants |
|
|
warrants |
|
Outstanding, beginning of year |
|
|
1,062,586 |
|
|
|
429,676 |
|
|
|
2,361,721 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
632,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(562,801 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,545 |
) |
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,877,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year |
|
|
499,785 |
|
|
|
1,062,586 |
|
|
|
429,676 |
|
|
|
|
F-35
13. |
|
COMMON STOCK AND WARRANTS OTHER THAN STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Warrants other than stock-based compensation (Continued) |
|
|
|
The following table shows the warrants outstanding as of December
31, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of grant |
|
Notes |
|
outstanding |
|
|
Exercise price |
|
|
Expiration date |
|
September 1, 2004 |
|
(i) |
|
|
170,451 |
|
|
US$2.98 |
|
|
September 3, 2009 |
September 25, 2006 |
|
(ii) |
|
|
329.334 |
|
|
US$4.50 |
|
|
March 25, 2012 |
September 25, 2006 |
|
(ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
US$4.221 |
|
|
February 5, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
On September 1, 2004, the Company issued warrants for the
investors of a private placement to purchase 484,221 shares of the Companys
common stock at an exercise price of US$2.98 per share with an expiration date
of September 3, 2009. |
|
(ii) |
|
On September 25, 2006, the Company issued long-term and
short-term warrants to the investors of a private placement. The long-term
warrants represent a five-year option to purchase in the aggregate up to
366,668 shares of common stock at $4.50 per share at any time during the period
from March 25, 2007 until March 25, 2012, and the short-term warrants represent
an option to purchase in the aggregate up to 236,909 shares of common stock at
$4.221 per share at any time during the period from September 25, 2006 until
February 5, 2007. |
|
|
|
The Company has also issued warrants to the placement agent of the private
placement to purchase 29,333 shares of the Company. The warrants issued to
the placement agent are identical to the long-term warrants. |
|
|
|
The fair value of warrants was valued using the Black Scholes option valuation model
with resulting allocation of the aggregate proceeds from private placement between
common stock and the underlying warrants, and which have been included in the
additional paid-in capital. |
F-36
14. |
|
EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS |
|
|
|
Following the introduction of the Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) legislation in Hong Kong,
the Company has participated in the defined contribution mandatory provident fund since
December 1, 2000. Both the Company and its employees in Hong Kong make monthly
contributions to the fund at 5% of the employees earnings as defined under Mandatory
Provident Fund legislation. The 5% monthly contribution of the Company and the employees
are subject to a cap of US$0.128 per month and thereafter contributions are voluntary. When
employees leave the MPF scheme prior to vesting fully in voluntary contributions, the
contributions payable by the Company are reduced by the amount of forfeited contributions. |
|
|
|
The amount of forfeitures in respect of the MPF scheme, which was available to reduce the
Companys contribution payable, for the year ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was
US$27, US$Nil and US$Nil, respectively. |
|
|
|
The full-time employees of the PRC subsidiaries are entitled to staff welfare benefits,
including medical care, welfare subsidies, unemployment insurance and pension benefits.
These companies are required to accrue for these benefits based on certain percentages of
the employees salaries in accordance with the relevant regulations, and to make
contributions to the state-sponsored pension and medical plans out of the amounts accrued
for medical and pension benefits. The state-sponsored retirement plan was responsible for
the entire pension obligations for the actual pension payments or post-retirement benefits
beyond the annual contributions. |
|
|
|
The Company has adopted Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (Profit Sharing Plan) for the
benefit of substantially all employees in the US that satisfied the age and service
requirements. The Companys contributions are determined according to a discretionary
formula in an amount determined each year by the management and will be allocated to
each Qualifying Participants individual account using the pro rata formula. No profit
sharing expense made during all financial periods since its adoption. |
|
|
|
Contributions paid and payable by the Company in respect of the employee retirement benefit
plans charged to the consolidated statement of operations were US$1,505, US$1,317 and
US$831 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 respectively. |
15. |
|
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
|
(a) |
|
Stock incentive plan |
|
|
|
|
On June 1, 1998, the Company adopted a stock option plan (The 1998 Plan) which was
approved by the shareholders on December 9, 1998. The 1998 Plan allows the Board of
Directors, or a committee thereof at the Boards discretion, to provide for a
total of 2,000,000 stock options to officers, directors, key employees and advisors
of the Company. |
F-37
15. |
|
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued) |
|
(a) |
|
Stock incentive plan (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Out of the stock options provided, 1,285,000 stock options were issued in accordance
with the terms of the 1998 Plan on April 12, 1999 to certain officers, directors,
key employees and advisors of the Company at an exercise price of US$5.0 per share
(the fair market value of the common stock as of April 12, 1999) and are exercisable
during the period from April 12, 1999 to April 11, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the 1999 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders on December 15, 1999, the
authorized number of stock options was increased from 2,000,000 to 4,000,000. The
purchase price of the shares of the Common Stock covered by the 1998 Plan shall be
at least 100% of the fair market value per share of such shares on the date of
grant, with a term of ten years. |
|
|
|
|
On July 1, 2003, the Company adopted the second stock plan (The 2003 Plan) which was
approved by the shareholders on December 5, 2003. The 2003 Plan allows the Board of
Directors, or a committee thereof at the Boards discretion, to provide for a total
of 4,000,000 stock options to officers, directors, key employees and advisors of the
Company. The purchase price of the shares of the Common Stock covered by The 2003
Plan could be less than, equal to or greater than 100% of the fair market value of
the Common Stock at the time of grant, with a term of ten years. |
|
|
|
|
On July 1, 2005, the Company adopted and approved the third stock plan (The 2005
Plan) which was approved by the shareholders on September 26, 2005. The Company
believes that a new plan is necessary since there are only a minimal number of
options remaining under The 1998 Plan and 2003 Plan. The Company believes that the
grant of stock options is accomplishing its purposes, which is to promote the
Company and the shareholders interests by providing key employees with an
opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company and to develop a
stronger incentive to put forth maximum effort for the Company continued success and
growth. In addition, the opportunity to acquire a propriety interest in the Company
aids the Company in attracting and retaining key personnel of outstanding ability. |
|
|
|
|
Options granted under The 2005 Plan will constitute either incentive stock
options within the meaning of Section 422 of the United States Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended, or options which constitute nonqualified options at the time of
issuance of such options. The 2005 Plan provides that incentive stock options
and/or nonqualified stock options may be granted to our officers, directors,
employees and advisors selected by the compensation committee. A total of
4,000,000 shares of common stock are authorized and reserved for issuance
during the term of The 2005 Plan, which expires in June 2015. The compensation
committee has the sole authority to interpret The 2005 Plan and make all
determinations necessary or advisable for administering The 2005 Plan. The exercise
price for any incentive option and nonqualified option may be less than, equal to or
greater than 100% and 110% respectively of the fair market value of the shares as of
the date of grant. |
F-38
15. |
|
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued) |
|
(a) |
|
Stock incentive plan (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Upon the exercise of the option, the exercise price must be paid in
full either in cash, shares of the Companys stock or combination. If any
option is not exercised for any reason, such shares shall again become
available for the purposes of The 2005 Plan. As of December 31, 2007,
1,500,000 options had been granted under The 2005 Plan. |
|
|
|
|
The stock options activities and related information are summarized as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
price |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Options |
|
|
price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
Outstanding, beginning of year |
|
|
1,821,000 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
3,310,500 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
|
|
3,759,000 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,113,500 |
|
|
|
2.44 |
|
Exercised (note 13(a)(v)) |
|
|
(1,897,000 |
) |
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
(1,489,500 |
) |
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
(3,162,000 |
) |
|
|
2.40 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400,000 |
) |
|
|
2.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year |
|
|
1,424,000 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
|
|
|
1,821,000 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
3,310,500 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise price less than the
market price on date of grant |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
Exercise price equals to
market price on date of grant |
|
|
404,000 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
409,000 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
701,000 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
Exercise price exceeds to
market price on date of grant |
|
|
870,000 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
|
|
1,262,000 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
2,459,500 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,424,000 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
|
|
|
1,821,000 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
3,310,500 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of exercise price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- US$2.00 |
|
|
1,010,500 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
1,407,500 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
2,797,000 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
- US$2.25 |
|
|
413,500 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
413,500 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
513,500 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,424,000 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
|
|
|
1,821,000 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
3,310,500 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- exercise price at US$2.00 |
|
|
963,625 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
1,041,125 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
2,093,125 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
- exercise price at US$2.25 |
|
|
413,500 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
413,500 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
513,500 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,377,125 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
1,454,625 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
|
|
|
2,606,625 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average remaining
contractual life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- exercise price at US$2.00 |
|
3.32 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.87 years |
|
|
|
|
|
6.09 years |
|
|
|
|
- exercise price at US$2.25 |
|
0.33 year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.33 years |
|
|
|
|
|
2.33 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All options issued, other than 46,875 options, are immediately exercisable as of
December 31, 2007. The 46,875 options are issued and outstanding but only vest in
2008. |
F-39
15. |
|
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued) |
|
(i) |
|
On August 16, 2001, the Company issued to an agent warrants to
purchase 200,000 shares of common stock of the Company at US$3.00 per share
exercisable through August 15, 2006 in consideration for consultancy services
and which have been expired as of December 31, 2006. |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Pursuant to a media relation services agreement dated April 5,
2005, the Company issued to a consultant warrants to purchase 50,000 shares,
150,000 shares, 150,000 shares, 100,000 shares and 50,000 shares of common
stock of the Company at US$2.80, US$3.00, US$3.50, US$4.00 and US$4.50
respectively per share exercisable through April 4, 2008. These warrants were
exercised during the year ended December 31, 2006 and 500,000 shares of common
stock were issued accordingly. |
|
|
(iii) |
|
In connection with private placement to investors completed in
September 2006, the Company issued to a consultant warrants to purchase 29,333
shares of common stock of the Company at US$4.50 per share exercisable through
March 25, 2012. |
|
|
|
Save as disclosed above, none of the warrants as aforesaid was exercised for
the three years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. The costs associated with
these transactions are accounted for based on fair value of the warrants on the date
of grant. |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of warrants granted during the years ended December
31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was estimated as US$47 and US$472 respectively
by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
weighted-average assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected stock price volatility |
|
|
42.5 |
% |
|
|
61 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.67 |
% |
|
|
3.91 |
% |
Expected life of warrants |
|
5.5 years |
|
3 years |
F-40
16. |
|
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
|
(a) |
|
Names and relationship of related parties: |
|
|
|
|
|
Existing relationships with the Company |
|
|
|
Yih Yu Chuan
|
|
Director and major beneficial shareholder of
the Company |
|
|
|
Tanzanite (H.K.) Limited
|
|
Common directors |
|
|
|
Osorio Mendes Quintino Neto
|
|
Minor shareholder and former director of a
subsidiary of the Company |
|
|
|
Andrew N. Bernstein
|
|
Non-executive director |
|
(b) |
|
Summary of balances with related parties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Note |
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Due from related parties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanzanite (H.K.) Limited |
|
(i) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to a related party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Osorio Mendes Quintino Neto |
|
(i) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain banking facilities granted to the
Company collateralized by properties owned by
Yih Yu Chuan and his personal guarantee to the
extent of |
|
|
|
|
14,708 |
|
|
|
23,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantee to a bank in respect of mortgage
loan granted to Yih Yu Chuan |
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
16. |
|
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued) |
|
(c) |
|
Summary of related party transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- to Osorio Mendes Quintino Neto |
|
|
|
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expense to Tanzanite (H.K.)
Limited |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Consultant fee to Osorio Mendes
Quintino Neto |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Legal fee and directors fee to
Andrew N. Bernstein |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company leases certain of its office and quarter from the related party. The
leases are for two years term expiring in 2008 and 2009. The Company may terminate
these tenancies at any time after the expiration of the first 12 months after the
commencement of the term of tenancy, by giving the landlord no less than two months
prior notice. |
|
|
|
(i) The amounts due from/ to related parties represent unsecured advances which are
interest-free and repayable on demand. |
17. |
|
SEGMENT INFORMATION |
|
|
|
The Company has adopted SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise
and Related Information, which establishes annual reporting standards for enterprise
business segments and related disclosures about its products and services, geographic
areas and major customers. SFAS No. 131 defines operating segments as components of an
enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated
regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources
and in assessing performance. |
|
|
|
The Company evaluates segment performance and allocates resources based on several
factors of which the primary financial measures are revenues from external customers
and operating income. As a result, the Company considers that it has two operating
segments, (i) manufacture and wholesale of jewelry products, and (ii) retail of jewelry
products. |
F-42
17. |
|
SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued) |
|
|
|
Contributions of the major activities, profitability information and asset information are
summarized below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wholesale |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenue from external customers |
|
|
117,689 |
|
|
|
34,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,037 |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
7,090 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
(2,076 |
) |
|
|
6,031 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
Interest expenses |
|
|
(3,103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,103 |
) |
Income before income taxes and
minority interests |
|
|
4,252 |
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
(2,074 |
) |
|
|
3,201 |
|
Incomes taxes |
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
|
|
(696 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
Minority interests in consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
3,236 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
(2,074 |
) |
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Depreciation |
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,095 |
|
-Minority interests |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
-Stock-based compensation cost |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets |
|
|
97,715 |
|
|
|
36,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,144 |
|
Total expenditures for additions to
long-lived assets |
|
|
1,162 |
|
|
|
1,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,139 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,095 |
|
|
|
|
F-43
17. |
|
SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wholesale |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenue from external customers |
|
|
108,679 |
|
|
|
15,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,791 |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
10,514 |
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
|
(2,228 |
) |
|
|
9,742 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Interest expenses |
|
|
(3,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,258 |
) |
Income before income taxes and
minority interests |
|
|
7,533 |
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
(2,224 |
) |
|
|
6,766 |
|
Incomes taxes |
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
(721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,403 |
) |
Minority interests in consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
6,813 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
(2,224 |
) |
|
|
5,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Depreciation |
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
-Minority interests |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
-Stock-based compensation cost |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets |
|
|
103,220 |
|
|
|
21,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,522 |
|
Total expenditures for additions to
long-lived assets |
|
|
3,078 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,183 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
|
F-44
17. |
|
SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wholesale |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenue from external customers |
|
|
97,145 |
|
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,646 |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
8,808 |
|
|
|
(1,847 |
) |
|
|
(1,290 |
) |
|
|
5,671 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
Interest expenses |
|
|
(1,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,991 |
) |
Income before income taxes, minority
interests and extraordinary item |
|
|
6,956 |
|
|
|
(1,847 |
) |
|
|
(1,290 |
) |
|
|
3,819 |
|
Incomes taxes |
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(739 |
) |
Minority interests in consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Extraordinary gain on negative goodwill |
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
7,488 |
|
|
|
(1,847 |
) |
|
|
(1,290 |
) |
|
|
4,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Depreciation |
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
-Extraordinary (gain) on negative goodwill |
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
-Minority interests |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
-Stock-based compensation cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets |
|
|
101,260 |
|
|
|
6,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,230 |
|
Total expenditures for additions to
long-lived assets |
|
|
1,864 |
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,869 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
|
|
F-45
17. |
|
SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued) |
|
(a) |
|
Geographical areas: |
|
|
|
|
The following summarizes the Companys revenue from the following
geographic areas (based on the location of the customer). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Revenue from external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US & Canada |
|
|
80,572 |
|
|
|
76,889 |
|
|
|
67,780 |
|
Europe and other countries |
|
|
32,597 |
|
|
|
24,452 |
|
|
|
20,527 |
|
Japan |
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
3,686 |
|
PRC (including Hong Kong and
Macau) |
|
|
36,662 |
|
|
|
19,996 |
|
|
|
7,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,037 |
|
|
|
123,791 |
|
|
|
99,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Carrying amount of long-lived assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hong Kong |
|
|
5,117 |
|
|
|
5,485 |
|
PRC |
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
4,163 |
|
US |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets (excluding goodwill) |
|
|
9,752 |
|
|
|
9,758 |
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
124,392 |
|
|
|
114,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets |
|
|
134,144 |
|
|
|
124,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
18. |
|
SIGNIFICANT CONCENTRATIONS AND RISKS |
|
(a) |
|
Revenue concentrations |
|
|
|
|
The Company derived operating revenue from the following major customers,
which accounted for over 10% of operating revenue. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
% |
|
Customer A |
|
|
14,840 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9,894 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5,975 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Customer B |
|
|
11,993 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
12,700 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10,772 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Customer C |
|
|
8,564 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
10,334 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
13,093 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables related to these major customers were US$398, US$1,455 and US$1,569
as of December 31, 2007 respectively and US$204, US$1,397 and US$1,247 as of December
31, 2006 respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Dependence on suppliers |
|
|
|
|
Gold is the major raw material used in the production of the Companys jewelry
products. The Company purchased gold from banks, gold refiners and commodity dealers
who supplied substantially all of the Companys gold needs, which the Company believed
was sufficient to meet its requirement. |
|
|
|
|
The major suppliers of gold accounted 10% or more of total purchases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
% |
|
Supplier A |
|
|
25,841 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Supplier B |
|
|
11,348 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
30,150 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
18,031 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Supplier C |
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3,425 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
9,656 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
New supplier since 2006 |
|
|
|
Trade payables related to these major suppliers were US$187 and US$9 as of December 31,
2007 and 2006 respectively. |
19. |
|
RECLASSIFICATIONS |
|
|
|
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to confirm to the current year
presentation. |
F-47
Schedule II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Sales return reserves |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
524 |
|
Charges to operations |
|
|
8,154 |
|
Deductions |
|
|
(6,474 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
2,204 |
|
Charges to operations |
|
|
8,581 |
|
Deductions |
|
|
(8,348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,437 |
|
Charges to operations |
|
|
9,464 |
|
Deductions |
|
|
(10,348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-48
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are being filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 20-F:
|
1.1 |
|
Memorandum of Association of the Company* |
|
|
1.2 |
|
Articles of Association of the Company* |
|
|
1.3 |
|
Amendment to Articles of Association of the Company* |
|
|
4.1 |
|
Employment Agreement of Yu Chuan Yih with the Registrant** |
|
|
8.1 |
|
List of Significant Subsidiaries of the Company |
|
|
11.1 |
|
Code of Ethics*** |
|
|
12.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
12.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
13.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
13.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to our Registration Statement on Form F-1 and
pre-effective and post-effective amendments thereto, SEC File No. 333-7912, declared effective
on April 15, 1998. |
|
** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006. |
|
*** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003. |
-113-
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F
and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its
behalf.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LJ INTERNATIONAL INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: June 27, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ YU CHUAN YIH
|
|
|
|
Yu Chuan Yih |
|
|
|
Chairman |
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Memorandum of Association of the Company* |
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Articles of Association of the Company* |
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Amendment to Articles of Association of the Company* |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Employment Agreement of Yu Chuan Yih with the Registrant** |
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
List of Significant Subsidiaries of the Company |
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Code of Ethics*** |
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to our Registration Statement on Form F-1 and
pre-effective and post-effective amendments thereto, SEC File No. 333-7912, declared effective
on April 15, 1998. |
|
** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006. |
|
*** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2003. |