He has also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Bridge Information Systems from 2000 to 2001, Reader’s Digest Association from 1995 to 1997 and RJR Nabisco from 1990 to 1995. His additional prior experience includes senior management and financial positions at Cadbury Beverages North America from 1985 to 1989 and Pepsico Inc from 1976 to 1985, where he served as head of planning, Chief Financial Officer of Pepsi USA, and President of Frito-Lay Brazil.

Committees of the Board of Directors and Meetings

Meeting Attendance.    The Board of Directors has a policy that directors make all reasonable efforts to attend our company's annual stockholder meetings. Carl Yankowski, Laurence Aronson, James Halpin, Louis Lipschitz, Jesse Sutton, Joseph Sutton, Morris Sutton and Marc Weisman attended last year's annual stockholders' meeting. In 2005, there were a total of 20 meetings of the Board of Directors. All of the directors attended the meetings.

Audit Committee.    The Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee, consisting of Messrs. Louis Lipschitz, Laurence Aronson, Marc Mazur, Stephen Wilson and Steven Weinstein. Prior to their resignation on February 3, 2006, Messrs. Marc Weisman and James Halpin also served on the Audit Committee during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005. Our Audit Committee held 8 meetings during fiscal year 2005. The Audit Committee acts under a written charter, which more specifically sets forth its responsibilities and duties, as well as requirements for the Committee’s composition and meetings. The charter of the Audit Committee was included as Appendix A to our proxy statement filed on May 9, 2005 which is publicly available through the EDGAR system at www.sec.gov.

On February 7, 2006, we provided written notification to the Nasdaq Stock Market that as a result of the resignation of Messrs. Marc Weisman and James Halpin, who both were independent directors, we were no longer compliant with Marketplace Rule 4350(d)(2) that requires the Audit Committee to be composed of at least three independent members. With the recent appointment of Messrs. Marc Mazur, Stephen Wilson and Steven Weinstein to the Board of Directors and to our Audit Committee, we believe we are now in compliance with Marketplace Rule 4350(d)(2). The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is ‘‘independent,’’ as that term is defined by applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is ‘‘independent’’, as that term is defined by Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Nasdaq Marketplace.

Mr. Lipschitz currently serves as the chairman of the Audit Committee. The Board of Directors has determined that, based upon Mr. Lipschitz’s experience in the fields of accounting and auditing services, he qualifies as an ‘‘audit committee financial expert’’ within the meaning of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Please see ‘‘The Board of Directors’’ for a description of Mr. Lipschitz’s relevant experience in the fields of accounting and auditing services.

Compensation Committee.    The Board of Directors has a standing Compensation Committee, consisting of Messrs. Louis Lipschitz, Laurence Aronson, Marc Mazur, Stephen Wilson and Steven Weinstein. During fiscal year 2005, and prior to his resignation on February 3, 2006, James Halpin was also a member of the Compensation Committee. The Committee is responsible for establishing and administering our executive compensation policies. Mr. Aronson currently serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee held 6 meetings during fiscal year 2005.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.    The Board of Directors has a standing Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Messrs. Laurence Aronson, Louis Lipschitz, Marc Mazur, Stephen Wilson and Steven Weinstein. The Committee may employ a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. All members of the Committee qualify as independent under the definition promulgated by the Nasdaq Stock Market. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held 3 meetings during fiscal year 2005. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee acts under a written charter, which more specifically sets forth its responsibilities and duties, as well as requirements for the Committee’s composition and meetings. The charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is attached as Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement.

The Committee regularly assesses the size of the Board, the need for particular expertise on the Board, the upcoming election cycle of the Board and whether any vacancies on the Board are

9

Table of Contents

expected due to retirement or otherwise. Candidates may be evaluated at regular or special meetings of the Committee, and may be considered at any point during the year.

As reflected in the charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, factors considered by the Committee in the selection of director nominees are those it may deem appropriate, including judgment, character, high ethics and standards, integrity, skills, diversity, independence, experience with businesses and organizations of a comparable size to the Company, the interplay of the candidate’s experience with the experience of other Board members and the extent to which the candidate would be a desirable addition to the Board or any of its committees. In addition, in considering nominees for director, the Committee will review the qualifications of available candidates that are brought to the attention of the Committee by any member of the Board, stockholders and management or identified by the Committee through the use of search firms or otherwise.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not set specific, minimum qualifications that nominees must meet in order for the Committee to recommend them to the Board of Directors, but rather believes that each nominee should be evaluated based on his or her individual merits, taking into account the needs of the Company and the composition of the Board of Directors. Members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee discuss and evaluate possible candidates in detail prior to recommending them to the Board of Directors.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended by stockholders, when the nominations are properly submitted. The policy adopted by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee provides that nominees recommended by stockholders are given appropriate consideration and will be evaluated in the same manner as other nominees. The deadlines and procedures for stockholder submissions of director nominees are described below under ‘‘Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations.’’ Following verification of the stockholder status of persons proposing candidates, the Committee makes an initial analysis of the qualifications of any candidate recommended by stockholders or others pursuant to the criteria summarized above to determine whether the candidate is qualified for service on the Company's Board before deciding to undertake a complete evaluation of the candidate. If any materials are provided by a stockholder or professional search firm in connection with the nomination of a director candidate, such materials are forwarded to the Committee as part of its review. Other than the verification of compliance with procedures and stockholder status, and the initial analysis performed by the Committee, a potential candidate nominated by a stockholder is treated like any other potential candidate during the review process by the Committee.

On March 23, 2006, the Board of Directors received a notice from Trinad Capital Master Fund Ltd., a stockholder of the Company holding more than 5% of our common stock, of its intention to nominate three (3) persons for the election to the Board of Directors of the Company. The persons that Trinad Capital Master Fund Ltd. intends to nominate for election at the Annual Meeting are Robert S. Ellin, Jay A. Wolf and Elliot Goldman. These three nominees, if elected would become Class I directors. On March 29, 2006, after careful consideration of these three nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee chose not to recommend these persons to the Board of Directors.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.    The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is composed entirely of directors who are not our current or former employees. The Committee is responsible for establishing and administering our executive compensation policies. The current members of our Compensation Committee are Messrs. Louis Lipschitz, Laurence Aronson, Marc Mazur, Stephen Wilson and Steven Weinstein. Our Committee has no interlocks with other companies.

Communications with the Board

Stockholders may communicate with the Board of Directors by sending an email to InvestorRelations@majescoentertainment.com or by sending a letter to Majesco Entertainment Company’s Board of Directors, c/o the Office of the Secretary, 160 Raritan Center Parkway, Edison, New Jersey 08837. The Office of the Secretary will receive the correspondence and forward it to the

10

---

Table of Contents

Chairman of the Audit Committee or to any individual director or directors to whom the communication is directed, unless the communication is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal, does not reasonably relate to Majesco or its business, or is similarly inappropriate. The Office of the Secretary has the authority to discard or disregard any inappropriate communications or to take other appropriate actions with respect to any such inappropriate communications.

Compensation of Directors

During the first nine months of our 2005 fiscal year, we paid each of our non-employee directors $15,000 annually for serving on our board and a fee of $1,000 for in-person attendance ($1,500 for the Chairman), and a fee of $500 for telephone attendance ($1,000 for the Chairman), at board or committee meetings. In addition, we paid the Chair of our Audit Committee an additional $15,000 for serving in such role. Other than Messrs. Lipschitz, Weisman, Halpin, Cuneo and Aronson, we did not pay directors any cash compensation for serving as a director.

Effective August 1, 2005, we revised our non-employee Director Compensation Policy as follows: each non-employee director receives an annual cash retainer of $40,000, other than the Chair of the Audit Committee who receives $50,000. In addition, each non-employee director receives annual equity grants valued at $40,000, other than the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee who receives a grant valued at $50,000 and the Chairs of the Compensation and Audit Committees who receive equity grants valued at $60,000. If the company were to appoint an Independent Chairman of the Board or Lead Independent Director, this person would receive an annual equity grant valued at $140,000. The equity portion of the compensation is a mix of 2/3 restricted stock and 1/3 stock options. The restricted stock is awarded quarterly with the number of shares determined by dividing the applicable dollar amount by the fair market value (as determined under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2004 Employee, Director and Consultant Incentive Plan) of the Company's common stock as of the quarterly grant date. The stock options are awarded annually with the number of shares determined using the Black-Scholes model.

During 2005, James Halpin, who was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors and served as Lead Director until his resignation on February 3, 2006, was awarded an option to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. These options expired upon Mr. Halpin’s resignation from the Board on February 3, 2006.

Legal Proceedings

On December 2, 2005, a vendor filed a complaint against us in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, alleging breach of contract and failure to pay in connection with services rendered. The complaint seeks approximately $2.6 million in damages plus interest and costs, including attorney’s fees. We intend to vigorously defend this action.

In July 2005, four purported class action complaints were filed against the Company and several current and former directors and officers of the Company in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. On September 12, 2005, a fifth purported class action complaint was filed in the same court on behalf of a class of individuals who purchased shares of the Company common stock in the Company’s January 26, 2005 offering of six million shares of common stock (which we refer to as the Offering). The complaint named as defendants the Company, current and former officers and directors of the Company, and certain financial institutions who served as underwriters with respect to the Offering.

On October 11, 2005, the Court consolidated the five cases and appointed a Lead Plaintiff. On December 14, 2005, the Lead Plaintiff filed an Amended Consolidated Complaint, which is now the operative Complaint. The Complaint names the following as defendants: the Company, Carl Yankowski, Jan E. Chason, Jesse Sutton, Joseph Sutton, Morris Sutton, Laurence Aronson, F. Peter Cuneo, James Halpin, Louis Lipschitz, Marc Weisman, RBC Capital Markets Corporation, JMP Securities LLC, Harris Nesbitt & Corp., Wedbush Morgan Securities Inc., and Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP.

11

---

Table of Contents

The Complaint alleges that the Registration Statement and Prospectus filed with the SEC in connection with the Company’s Offering and certain of the Company’s press releases and other public filings contained material misstatements and omissions about the Company’s financial condition and prospects as well as its products. The Lead Plaintiff asserts a claim under Section 11 of the Securities Act against all the defendants on behalf of investors who purchased in the Offering. It asserts a Section 12(a)(2) claim against the Company and the financial institutions who served as underwriters in connection with the Offering, and a Section 15 control person claim against defendants Carl Yankowski, Jan Chason, Jesse Sutton, Joseph Sutton, and Morris Sutton (which we refer to as the Defendants). The Lead Plaintiff also asserts a claim under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated there under against the Company and the Defendants and a claim under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against the Defendants. The Complaint seeks damages in an unspecified amount. The proposed class period for the Exchange Act claims is December 8, 2004 through September 12, 2005. We will continue to vigorously contest the action.

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers who are not also directors. We currently have an employment agreement with John Gross, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. All executives are at-will employees.

Name				Age				Position
John Gross				55				Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Jesse Sutton				37				President
Joseph Sutton				33				Executive Vice President of Research and Development
Richard Wnuk				61				Executive Vice President of Global Publishing

JOHN GROSS.    Mr. Gross has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 12, 2005. From December 2000 through June 2005, Mr. Gross served as Vice President, Corporate Development, for FactSet Research Systems Inc. Prior to such time, Mr. Gross served as Chief Financial Officer of Rare Medium and FactSet and held senior financial positions at PepsiCo, Reader’s Digest and Cadbury Schweppes.

JESSE SUTTON.    Mr. Sutton is currently our President and has served in such capacity since December 2003 and, until August 24, 2004, served as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Sutton has served as one of our directors from December 5, 2003 but resigned effective February 6, 2006 in order for our Board to continue to have a majority of independent directors. Mr. Sutton served as the President of Majesco Sales Inc. from 1997 until its merger into the Company, and from December 2003 to August 24, 2004, as its Chief Executive Officer. Jesse Sutton is Morris Sutton's son and Joseph Sutton's brother. From 1998 to 2001, Mr. Sutton was the President of Majesco Biologicals, Inc., a biotechnology development company, which ceased all operations in 2001 pursuant to an assignment for the benefit of creditors.

JOSEPH SUTTON.    Mr. Sutton is currently our Executive Vice President of Research and Development and has served in such capacity since December 2003. Mr. Sutton also served as one of our directors since December 5, 2003, but resigned effective February 6, 2006, in order for our Board to continue to have a majority of independent directors. From 1997 to September 2003, he was a Vice President of Majesco Sales Inc. and in December 2003, he became Majesco Sales Inc.'s Executive Vice President of Research and Development. Joseph Sutton is Morris Sutton's son and Jesse Sutton's brother.

RICHARD WNUK.    Mr. Wnuk is currently our Executive Vice President of Global Publishing. Since January 2005, Mr. Wnuk has served as a consultant to the Company in the area of international sales. Prior to that, he served for 10 years as Senior Executive Vice President at Time Warner Interactive U.S. He also served as Chief Operating Officer for Konami Entertainment U.S.

12

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth summary information as to compensation received by (i) our former Chief Executive Officer, (ii) the four most highly compensated executive officers who were employed by us at the end of the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005, and (iii) two individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided but for the fact that these individuals were not serving as executive officers at the end of the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005, for services rendered to us in all capacities during the three prior fiscal years ended October 31, 2005.

				Annual Compensation																Long-Term Compensation
																				Awards								Payouts
Name and Principal Position				Year				Salary ($)				Bonus ($)				Other Annual Compensation ($)				Restricted Stock Award(s) ($)				Securities Underlying Options/SARS ($)				LTIP Payouts ($)				All Other Compensation
Carl Yankowski, former Chief Executive Officer (1)					2005				340,409				80,000	(2)											—								—
					2004				72,000				—												992,857	(3)							14,500	(4)
					2003				—				—												—								—
Jesse Sutton, President					2005				288,495				266,700	(5)											90,000								—
					2004				274,500				—												—								—
					2003				350,000				—												—								17,000	(6)
Joseph Sutton, Executive Vice President of Research and Development					2005				246,168				—												51,000								—
					2004				274,500				—												—								—
					2003				350,000				112,500	(5)											—								17,000	(6)
Richard Wnuk, Executive Vice President of Global Publishing (7)					2005				113,469				45,000	(8)											124,000
					2004				—				—												—
					2003				—				—												—
John Gross, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (9)					2005				81,736				62,500	(10)											221,000
					2004				—				—												—
					2003				—				—												—
Jan E. Chason, Former Chief Financial Officer (11)					2005				234,316				120,823												45,000	(11)
					2004				200,000				50,000												57,142	(11)
					2003				159,000				—												—
Joseph Tuchinsky, General Counsel, Senior Vice President Business and Legal Affairs (12)					2005				198,837				20,000												—
					2004				204,000				50,000												—
					2003				—				—												28,571

(1)	Carl Yankowski resigned as Chief Executive Officer on July 8, 2005. As of October 31, 2005, the Company had not appointed a new Chief Executive Officer. Effective February 6, 2006, Morris Sutton became interim Chief Executive Officer and Chairman.

(2)	Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Yankowski’s employment agreement with the Company.

(3)	All of these options terminated upon Mr. Yankowski’s resignation on July 8, 2005.

13

---

Table of Contents

(4)	Represents payment of certain perquisites, including a ‘‘gross up’’ payment for all applicable taxes.

(5)	Represents bonus for performance in the Company’s 2004 fiscal year that was paid in the 2005 fiscal year.

(6)	These amounts represent contributions to the Company's Profit Sharing Plan on behalf of Jesse and Joseph Sutton.

(7)	Mr. Wnuk was appointed Executive Vice President on May 11, 2005.

(8)	Represents a signing bonus paid to Mr. Wnuk as part of his employment arrangement with the Company. This amount will count against any bonus amounts earned by Mr. Wnuk in his first year of employment with the Company.

(9)	Mr. Gross was appointed Chief Financial Officer on July 12, 2005.

(10)	Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Gross’ employment agreement with the Company.

(11)	Upon Mr. Gross’s appointment as Chief Financial Officer on July 12, 2005 Mr. Chason became the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer. Mr. Chason then departed the Company on February 10, 2006, at which time all of his options terminated, except for 28,571 options which shall expire 90 days following February 10, 2006, if unexercised.

(12)	Mr. Tuchinsky’s employment with the Company ended on August 12, 2005, and this amount represents compensation paid to him during the Company’s fiscal year ended October 31, 2005.

Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year

The following table shows grants of stock options that we made during the year ended October 31, 2005 to each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table above.

Name				Number of Securities Underlying Options/SARS Granted				Percent of Total Options/ SARS Granted to Employees in Fiscal Year ended October 31, 2005				Exercise or Base ($/Share)				Expiration Date				Grant Date Present Value(1)
Carl Yankowski					—			0.0%					—			—					—
Jesse Sutton					90,000			6.3%					3.20			07/31/2012				$	2.29
Joseph Sutton					51,000			3.6%					3.20			07/31/2012				$	2.29
Richard Wnuk					100,000			7.0%					8.00			05/10/2012				$	5.72
					24,000			1.7%					3.20			07/31/2012				$	2.29
John Gross					100,000			6.6%					7.23			06/26/2012				$	5.16
					100,000			6.6%					1.43			09/25/2012				$	1.02
					21,000			1.5%					3.20			07/31/2012				$	2.29
Jan Chason					14,285			1.0%					12.67			10/31/2011				$	5.98
					45,000			3.2%					3.20			07/31/2012				$	2.29
Joseph Tuchinsky					—			0.0%					—			—					—

(1)	The present value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: Risk free interest rate (annual): various rates ranging from 3.3% to 4.17%; Expected volatility: 50% and 90%; Expected life: 5 years; Assumed dividends: none.

Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values

The following table shows certain information with respect to options held as of October 31, 2005 by each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table above. None of such individuals exercised any options during the Company’s fiscal year ended October 31, 2005.

14

---

Table of Contents

Name				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year-End Exercisable/Unexercisable								Value of Unexercised In-The-Money-Options at Fiscal Year End ($)
Carl Yankowski					—				—				—				—
Jan Chason					28,571				73,571				—				—
Jesse Sutton					—				90,000				—				—
Joseph Sutton									51,000				—				—
Joseph Tuchinsky					—				—				—				—
John Gross					11,111				209,889				—				—
Richard Wnuk					20,000				104,000				—				—
					59,682				560,460

Equity Compensation Plan Information (as of October 31, 2005)

Plan category				Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)				Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)				Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders					1,912,550			$	6.90				4,230,307
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders					7,142			$	11.30				—
Total					1,919,692			$	6.92				4,230,307

Employee Benefit Plans

Amended and Restated 2004 Employee, Director and Consultant Incentive Plan

On April 14, 2005, our Board of Directors approved, and on June 8, 2005, our stockholders adopted, our Amended and Restated 2004 Employee, Director and Consultant Incentive Plan (the ‘‘Amended Plan’’), which amends and restates in its entirety our 2004 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan. The primary purposes of the amendment and restatement were to:

	•	increase the number of shares of our common stock available for awards by 4,000,000 shares;

	•	add a share counting formula to the Amended Plan pursuant to which each share issued under awards other than options or stock appreciation rights counts against the number of total shares available under the Amended Plan as 1.3 shares, and each share issued as options or stock appreciation rights counts against the total shares available under the Amended Plan as one share;

	•	increase the share limitation on the number of awards that may be granted to any participant in any fiscal year to 1,000,000;

	•	add provisions for the grant of cash awards and other types of equity based awards; and

	•	delete a provision explicitly allowing for the repricing of awards.

The other material features of the Amended Plan generally remain the same as under the terms of the 2004 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan previously approved by our stockholders.

Under the Amended Plan, the maximum number of shares that may be issued was increased to 6,142,857, after taking into account the 1-for-7 reverse stock split which occurred on December 31, 2004. As of October 31, 2005, 1,919,692 shares have been awarded under the plan and 4,230,307 remain eligible for issuance.

Material Features of our Amended Plan

The following paragraphs provide a summary of the principal features of our Amended Plan and its operation. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to our Amended Plan.

15

---

Table of Contents

The Amended Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options to our employees and cash awards, non-qualified stock options, restricted and unrestricted stock awards and other stock-based awards to employees, directors and consultants (currently approximately 74 people). An aggregate of 6,142,857 shares of common stock has been reserved for issuance under our Amended Plan, and, as of October 31, 2005, 4,230,307 shares remain eligible for issuance. In addition, each share issued under awards other than options or stock appreciation rights shall count against the number of total shares available under the Amended Plan as 1.3 shares, and each share issued as options or stock appreciation rights shall count against the total shares available under the Amended Plan as one share.

In accordance with the terms of our Amended Plan, our Board of Directors has authorized our Compensation Committee to administer the Amended Plan. The Compensation Committee may delegate part of its authority and powers under our Amended Plan to one or more of our directors and/or officers, but only the Compensation Committee can make awards to participants who are directors or executive officers of the Company.

The maximum term of options granted under our Amended Plan is seven years. Awards are generally subject to early termination upon the termination of employment or other relationship of the participant with us, whether such termination is at our option or as a result of the death or disability of the participant. Generally, in the event of a participant's termination for cause, all outstanding awards shall be forfeited. No participant may receive awards for more than 1,000,000 shares of common stock in any fiscal year or a cash award in excess of $2,000,000 in any calendar year. Our Amended Plan does not provide for the repricing of stock options or other awards.

The vesting of certain awards granted to employees who are ‘‘Covered Employees’’ (as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code) may be based on the attainment of Performance Goals (as defined in the Amended Plan) pre-established by the Compensation Committee.

In addition, our Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, amend any term or condition of an outstanding award provided (i) such term or condition as amended is permitted by our Amended Plan, and (ii) any such amendment shall be made only with the consent of the participant to whom such award was made, if the amendment is adverse to the participant.

Our Amended Plan may be amended by our stockholders. It may also be amended by the Board of Directors, provided that any amendment approved by the Board of Directors which is of a scope that requires stockholder approval as required by the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, in order to ensure favorable federal income tax treatment for any incentive stock options under Code Section 422, or for any other reason, is subject to obtaining such stockholder approval. Our Amended Plan will expire on February 13, 2014.

During 2003, we merged our existing defined contribution pension plan and money purchase pension plan which covered all eligible employees. No contributions have been made under the plan during our 2005 and 2004 fiscal years.

During October 2003, we adopted a defined contribution 401(k) plan covering all eligible employees.

Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements

We currently have an employment agreement with John Gross, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Gross’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $250,000. Mr. Gross is eligible to receive a discretionary bonus of up to 50% of his base salary, if so determined by the Company in accordance with the terms of the agreement, which for each of fiscal 2005 and 2006 shall not be less than $62,500. In addition, Mr. Gross was granted, pursuant to our Amended and Restated 2004 Employee, Director and Consultant Incentive Plan, options to purchase a total of 100,000 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $7.23, which options vest and become exercisable as to 1/36th of such grant amount each month commencing as of July 1, 2005, subject to Mr. Gross’s continuous service with the Company. If the Company terminates Mr. Gross’s employment without cause (as defined in the agreement) or the agreement is terminated by Mr. Gross

16

---

Table of Contents

for good reason (as defined in the agreement), he will receive severance benefits from the Company, including, among other benefits and severance payments, continued payment of his then base salary for a period of 12 months, a lump sum payment in the amount of his annual target bonus, and for any such termination occurring within 90 days after an annual bonus period, a percentage of the annual bonus, provided an annual bonus would have otherwise been awarded. Mr. Gross shall also be eligible to receive a 280G ‘‘Gross-Up’’ payment to the extent any payment to him is characterized as a ‘‘parachute payment’’ within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The agreement contains customary confidentiality, non-competition, non-solicitation, and indemnification terms and is terminable at-will by either party, subject to the conditions set forth above.

Performance Graph: Comparison of Cumulative Total Return

The following graph compares the yearly percentage change in our cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock during a period commencing on December 5, 2003 and ending on October 31, 2005 (as measured by dividing (A) the difference between our share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by (B) the share price at the beginning of the measurement period) with the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Index and our peer group ⁽¹⁾ during such period. It should be noted that we have not paid any dividends on our common stock, and no dividends are included in the representation of our performance. The stock price performance on the graph below is not necessarily indicative of future price performance. This graph is not ‘‘soliciting material,’’ is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing. Information used on the graph was obtained from the Standard & Poor's Institutional Market Services, a source believed to be reliable, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions in such information.

(1)	Our ‘‘peer group’’ consists of the following: Activision Inc., Electronic Arts Inc., Midway Games Inc., Take-Two Interactive Software and THQ Inc.

				December 2003				October 2005
Majesco Entertainment Company (Nasdaq Capital Market: COOL)				$100					22.99
S&P 500 Index				$100					117.56
Peer Group				$100					153.32

17

---

Table of Contents

REPORT OF COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Overview

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing and administering our executive compensation policies. This report addresses the compensation policies for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005 as they affected Carl Yankowski, in his capacity as our Chief Executive Officer until his resignation on July 8, 2005, and how the policies affect Morris Sutton, in his capacity as interim Chief Executive Officer, effective February 3, 2006, and our other executive officers. The current members of the committee are Louis Lipschitz, Laurence Aronson, Marc Mazur, Steven Weinstein and Stephen Wilson. During the fiscal year 2005, and prior to his resignation on February 3, 2006, James Halpin was also a member of the Compensation Committee.

General Compensation Policy

The objectives of our executive compensation program are to:

	•	provide a competitive compensation package that will attract and retain superior talent and reward performance;

	•	support the achievement of our desired performance; and

	•	align the interests of executives with the long-term interests of stockholders through award opportunities that can result in ownership of common stock, thereby encouraging the achievement of superior results over an extended period.

Executive Officer Compensation Program

The Company's executive officer compensation program is comprised of: (i) base salary, which is set on an annual basis; (ii) discretionary incentive bonuses, which are based on the achievement of objectives and our performance; and (iii) discretionary incentive compensation in the form of equity incentive grants, with the objective of aligning the executive officers' long-term interests with those of the stockholders and encouraging the achievement of superior results over an extended period.

The Compensation Committee performs annual reviews of executive compensation to confirm the competitiveness of the overall executive compensation packages as compared with companies who compete with us to attract and retain employees.

Base Salary

Base salaries are set competitively relative to companies in the digital entertainment industry and other comparable companies. In determining salaries, the Compensation Committee also takes into consideration individual experience and performance. The Compensation Committee seeks to compare the salaries paid by companies similar in size and industry to us. Within this comparison group, we seek to make comparisons to executives at a comparable level of experience, who have a comparable level of responsibility and expected level of contribution to our performance. In setting base salaries, the Compensation Committee also takes into account the level of competition among digital entertainment companies to attract talented personnel.

Incentive Bonuses

We establish goals related specifically to that officer's areas of responsibility. The Compensation Committee determines the amount of each executive's bonus based on a subjective assessment by the Compensation Committee of the officer's progress toward achieving the established goals. Bonuses, if any, are typically awarded on an annual basis.

Long-term Incentive Compensation

Long-term incentive compensation, in the form of stock options and restricted stock grants, allows the executive officers to share in any appreciation in the value of our common stock. The

18

---

Table of Contents

Compensation Committee believes that equity participation aligns executive officers' interests with those of the stockholders. The amounts of the awards are designed to reward past performance and create incentives to meet long-term objectives. Awards are made at a level calculated to be competitive within the digital entertainment industry as well as a broader group of companies of comparable size. In determining the amount of each grant, the Compensation Committee takes into account the number of shares held by the executive prior to the grant as well as our performance and the individual executive. The plan provides that awards will be canceled and that certain gains must be repaid if an executive officer violates certain provisions of the plan. These provisions include prohibitions against engaging in activity that is detrimental to us, such as performing services for a competitor, disclosing confidential information or soliciting customers away from the company.

Chief Executive Officer Compensation

The salary during the last fiscal year for our former Chief Executive Officer, Carl Yankowski, who served until his resignation on July 8, 2005, was determined in accordance with our employment agreement with him, effective as of August 23, 2004. Mr. Yankowski did not receive any options in fiscal year 2005.

Tax Considerations

The Compensation Committee's compensation strategy is to be cost and tax effective. Therefore, the Compensation Committee's policy is to preserve corporate tax deductions, while maintaining the flexibility to approve compensation arrangements that it deems to be in the best interests of the company and its stockholders, even if such arrangements do not always qualify for full tax deductibility.

				THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE:
				Laurence Aronson Louis Lipschitz

19

---

Table of Contents

REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which consists entirely of directors who meet the required independence and experience requirements of Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, has furnished the following report:

The Committee assists the Board in overseeing and monitoring the integrity of our financial reporting process, its compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the quality of its external audit processes. The role and responsibilities of the Committee are set forth in a written charter adopted by the Board. The Committee is responsible for selecting, compensating and retaining our independent auditors, approving the services they will perform, and reviewing the performance of the independent auditors. The Committee reviews with management and the independent auditors our annual financial statements on Forms 10-K and our quarterly financial statements on Forms 10-Q. The Committee reviews and reassesses the charter annually and recommends any changes to the Board for approval. The Committee is responsible for overseeing our overall financial reporting process. In fulfilling its responsibilities for the financial statements for fiscal year 2005, the Audit Committee took the following actions:

	•	reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005 with management and Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP, our independent auditors;

	•	discussed with Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 relating to the conduct of the audit; and

	•	received written disclosures and the letter from Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP regarding its independence as required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1. The Committee further discussed with Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP their independence. The Committee also considered the status of pending litigation, taxation matters and other areas of oversight relating to the financial reporting and audit process that the Committee determined appropriate.

Based on the Audit Committee's review of the audited financial statements and discussions with management and Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

				THE AUDIT COMMITTEE:
				Louis Lipschitz Laurence Aronson

20

---

Table of Contents

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. These persons are required by regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file. Based on our review of the copies of these reports received by us, or written representations from the reporting persons that no other reports were required, we believe that, during fiscal year 2005, all filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners were complied with, except that initial reports of ownership were inadvertently filed late by Messrs. Greenman, Gross and Wnuk; statements of changes in beneficial ownership of securities were also filed late by Mr. Gross, covering one transaction; Mr. Greenman, covering an aggregate of three transactions; Mr. Aronson, covering one transaction; and Mr. Wnuk, covering one transaction.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

We currently use the services of a printing and packaging company in which Morris Sutton's brother is a co-owner. In fiscal year 2005, we received services from this company for which we were billed approximately $2.3 million. Such charges are, to our knowledge, on terms no less favorable than what we could receive from providers of similar services.

During fiscal year 2005, the Company paid approximately $190,000 to Compass Marketing Inc. for distribution services. Keith Harrison, one of our directors, is a majority owner and chief executive officer of Compass Marketing Inc.

21

---

Table of Contents

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Notice Item 1)

On May 1, 2006, the Board of Directors nominated Morris Sutton, Louis Lipschitz and Marc Mazur for election as Class I directors at the Annual Meeting. All nominees identified below are expected to serve if elected, and each of them has consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected. All the nominees are currently directors of the Company.

Unless authority to vote for any of the nominees named above is withheld, the shares represented by the enclosed proxy will be voted FOR the election as directors of such nominees. In the event that any nominee shall become unable or unwilling to serve, the shares represented by the enclosed proxy will be voted for the election of such other person as the Board of Directors may recommend in that nominee's place. The Board has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to serve.

The affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting is required to elect our nominees for Class I directors. Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Second Amended and Restated Bylaws currently provide for a classified Board of Directors. All nominees will be Class I Directors and will have a term that expires at the annual meeting in 2009.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THE ELECTION OF MORRIS SUTTON, LOUIS LIPSCHITZ AND MARC MAZUR AS DIRECTORS, AND PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR THEREOF UNLESS A STOCKHOLDER HAS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE PROXY.

22

---

Table of Contents

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT
OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

(Notice Item 2)

The Audit Committee has appointed Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP, independent public accountants, to audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2006. The Board proposes that the stockholders ratify this appointment. We expect that representatives of Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP will be present at the meeting, will be able to make a statement if they so desire, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Through September 30, 2005, Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP had a continuing relationship with American Express Tax and Business Services Inc. from which it leased auditing staff who were full time, permanent employees of TBS and through which its partners provided non-audit services. Subsequent to September 30, 2005 this relationship ceased and Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP established a similar relationship with RSM McGladrey, Inc. Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP has no full time employees, and, therefore, none of the audit services performed were provided by permanent, full-time employees of Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP. Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP manages and supervises the audit and audit staff and is exclusively responsible for the opinion rendered in connection with its examination.

The following table sets forth the fees billed by our independent accountants for each of our last two fiscal years for the categories of services indicated.

Category				Fiscal Year 2005				% of Total				Fiscal Year 2004				% of Total
Audit fees (1)				$	973,161				93.5	%		$	284,208				45.4	%
Audit-related fees (2)				$	41,865				4.1	%		$	211,559				33.8	%
Tax fees (3)				$	25,000				2.4	%		$	129,461				20.8	%
All other fees					—				—				—				—
Total Fees				$	1,040,026				100	%		$	625,228				100	%

(1)	Consists of fees billed for the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

(2)	Consists of assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit and reviews of our financial statements and are not included in ‘‘audit fees’’ in this table. The services provided by our accountants within this category consisted of advice relating to SEC matters and employee benefit matters.

(3)	Consists of professional services rendered by a company aligned with our principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

In addition to retaining Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP to audit our consolidated financial statements for the years ended October 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, we retained Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP to provide other auditing and advisory services to us in our 2005, 2004 and 2003 fiscal years. We understand the need for Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP to maintain objectivity and independence in its audit of our financial statements. To minimize relationships that could appear to impair the objectivity of Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP, our Audit Committee has restricted the non-audit services that Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP and its aligned company may provide to us primarily to tax services.

The Audit Committee also has adopted policies and procedures for pre-approving all non-audit work performed by Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP. During the course of the year, the Audit Committee will review, evaluate and approve proposed services, including the nature, type and scope of services contemplated and the related fees, to be rendered by Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP.

23

---

Table of Contents

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE TO APPROVE THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP AS INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS, AND PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED IN FAVOR THEREOF UNLESS A STOCKHOLDER HAS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE PROXY.

24

---

Table of Contents

CORPORATE CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS

We have adopted a Corporate Code of Conduct and Ethics that applies to all employees, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, and directors. The code can be found on our website at http://www.majescoentertainment.com/corp/ccoc.php. We will provide, without charge, a copy of our Corporate Code of Conduct and Ethics upon request to: Investor Relations, Majesco Entertainment Company, 160 Raritan Center Parkway, Edison, New Jersey 08837.

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

Cost and Method

We will pay all of the costs of soliciting these proxies. We estimate that the total expenditures relating to our proxy solicitation (other than salaries and wages of officers and employees) will be approximately $100,000, of which approximately $35,000 has been incurred as of the date hereof. In addition to solicitation by mail, our directors may, without additional compensation, solicit proxies by mail, e-mail, facsimile, in person or by telephone or other forms of telecommunication.

We have engaged Innisfree M&A Incorporated, at an estimated cost of $20,000, plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, to assist in the solicitation of proxies for this Annual Meeting. We will reimburse brokerage houses, banks, custodians and other nominees and fiduciaries for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in forwarding our proxy materials to, and obtaining instructions relating to such materials from, beneficial owners of our common stock. Innisfree M&A Incorporated and certain related persons will be indemnified against certain liabilities arising out or in connection with the engagement.

Participants in the Proxy Solicitation

Under applicable regulations of the SEC, each of our directors may be deemed to be a participant in our solicitation of proxies in connection with the Annual Meeting. Please refer to the sections of this proxy statement entitled ‘‘Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management,’’ ‘‘Management and Corporate Governance — The Board of Directors,’’ Annex I, ‘‘Certain Information Regarding Participants in this Proxy Solicitation’’ and Annex II, ‘‘Recent Trading History of Participants in this Proxy Solicitation’’ for information about our directors who may be deemed participants in the solicitation. Except as described in this proxy statement, there are no agreements or understandings between us and any of our directors or executive officers relating to their employment with us or any future transactions.

Other than the persons described above and in Annex I, no general class of our employees will be employed to solicit stockholders. However, in the course of their regular duties, employees may be asked to perform clerical or ministerial tasks in furtherance of this solicitation.

OTHER MATTERS

As of the date of this proxy statement, the Board of Directors knows of no other business that will be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other business is properly brought before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that proxies in the enclosed form will be voted in respect thereof in accordance with the best judgment and in the discretion of the persons voting the proxies.

25

---

Table of Contents

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS

Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in the company's proxy statement and for consideration at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders by submitting their proposals to the Company in a timely manner. In order to be so included for the next Annual Meeting, stockholder proposals must be received by the company no later than January 24, 2007 and must otherwise comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8.

In addition, the Company's by-laws have an advance notice procedure with regard to nominations for the election of directors and business proposals to be brought before an annual meeting of stockholders by any stockholder. In general, any stockholder may nominate one or more persons for election as directors or propose business to be brought before an annual meeting, or both, only if such stockholder has given timely notice in proper written form of such nomination or nominations or business proposal, setting forth certain specified information relating to such stockholder and his or her nominations or business proposal. To be timely, notice must be received by the Company's Secretary not less than 45 (but not more than 75) days prior to the first anniversary of the date on which the company first mailed its proxy materials for the preceding year's annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than thirty (30) days before or more than thirty (30) days after the anniversary date of the preceding year's annual meeting, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the close of business on the ninetieth (90) day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the sixtieth (60th) day prior to such annual meeting or the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company.

Stockholder proposals or notices of intent to nominate candidates for election as directors should be submitted to Majesco Entertainment Company, Attention: Secretary, at 160 Raritan Center Parkway, Edison, New Jersey 08837.

Edison, New Jersey

May 22, 2006

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005, as amended on February 28, 2006, and (other than exhibits thereto) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which provides additional information about Majesco, is available to beneficial owners of our common stock without charge upon written request to Investor Relations, Majesco Entertainment Company, 160 Raritan Center Parkway, Edison, New Jersey 08837. The information is also publicly available through the EDGAR system at www.sec.gov and is available on our website at www.majescoentertainment.com in the ‘‘Investor Info’’ section.

26

---

Table of Contents

ANNEX I
CERTAIN INFORMATION REGARDING PARTICPANTS IN THIS PROXY SOLICITATION

Under applicable SEC regulations, each member of our Board of Directors may be deemed a participant in our solicitation of proxies in connection with the Annual Meeting. The principal occupations of the directors who are deemed participants in the solicitation are set forth under ‘‘Management and Corporate Governance — The Board of Directors’’ in this proxy statement. The name and business address of the director-participants’ organization of employment are as follows:

Name				Address				Position
Morris Sutton				(1)				Chairman, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Director
Louis Lipschitz				(1)				Director
Marc Mazur				(1)				Director
Laurence Aronson				(1)				Director
Keith Harrison				(1)				Director
Stephen Wilson				(1)				Director
Steven Weinstein				(1)				Director

(1)	c/o Majesco Entertainment Company, 160 Raritan Center Parkway, Edison, New Jersey 08837

Information Regarding Ownership of the Company’s Securities by Participants

The number of shares of common stock beneficially held by directors is set forth under ‘‘Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management’’ in this proxy statement.

Miscellaneous Information Concerning Participants

Except as described in this Annex I or this proxy statement, neither any participant nor any affiliates of such participant is either a party to any transaction or series of transactions since November 1, 2004, or has knowledge of any currently proposed transaction or series of proposed transactions, (i) to which the Company was or is to be a party, (ii) in which the amount involved exceeds $60,000 and (iii) in which any participant or any affiliates of such participant had, or will have, a direct material interest.

Except as described in this Annex I or this proxy statement, no participant or any affiliates of such participant has entered into any agreement or understanding with any person respecting any future employment by the Company or any of its affiliates or any future transactions to which the Company or any of its affiliates will or may be a party. Except as described in this Annex I or this proxy statement, there are no contracts, arrangements or understandings by any participant or any affiliates of such participant within the past year with respect to securities of the Company.

27

---

Table of Contents

ANNEX II
RECENT TRADING HISTORY OF PARTICIPANTS IN THIS PROXY SOLICITATION

The following is a list of all acquisitions and dispositions of our common stock made during the last two years by persons who may be deemed participants in our proxy solicitation.

				2004								2005								2006
Name				Acquisitions				Dispositions				Acquisitions				Dispositions				Acquisitions				Dispositions
Morris Sutton				—				—				08/03 132,576 options (1)      04/05 2,500 shares of Common Stock				—				04/04 5,000 shares of Common Stock				—
Louis Lipschitz				04/30 14,285 options (2)				—				11/03 6,060 shares of Common Stock (3)      08/03 3,125 shares of Common Stock (3)      08/03 15,267 options (1)      05/09 1,573 shares of Common Stock (3)				—				05/03 6,451 shares of Common Stock (3)      02/03 9,090 shares of Common Stock (3)				—
Marc Mazur				—				—				—				—				05/03 4,301 shares of Common Stock (3)				—
Laurence Aronson				11/04 14,285 options (2)								11/03 4,042 shares of Common Stock (3)      08/03 2,084 shares of Common Stock (3)      08/03 10,168 options (1)      05/09 786 shares of Common Stock (3)								05/03 6,451 shares of Common Stock (3)      02/03 9,090 shares of Common Stock (3)
Keith Harrison				—				—				—				—				—				—
Stephen Wilson				—				—				—				—				—				—
Steven Weinstein				—				—				—				—				05/03 4,301 shares of Common Stock (3)				—

(1)	These options are exercisable over a two-year period with one-half vesting on each of the first and second anniversaries of the date of issuance of the options.

(2)	These options are exercisable over a three-year period with one-third vesting on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of issuance of the options.

(3)	These shares of restricted stock vest six months from the date of the grant. See "Management and Corporate Governance – Compensation of Directors".

28

---

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT A
CHARTER OF THE NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

PURPOSE OF THE COMMITTEE

The purpose of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the "Committee") of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Majesco Entertainment Company (the "Company") is to:

	•	assist the Board by identifying qualified candidates for director, and to recommend to the Board the director nominees for the next annual meeting of stockholders;

	•	lead the Board in its annual review of the Board's performance;

	•	recommend to the Board director nominees for each committee of the Board;

	•	oversee the annual process of evaluation of the performance of the Company's management; and

	•	develop and recommend to the Board corporate governance guidelines applicable to the Company.

To assist in carrying out its duties, the Committee shall have sole authority to retain and terminate any search firm to be used to identify candidates to serve as directors, including sole authority to approve the search firm's fees and other retention terms. In addition, the Committee shall have authority to obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal, accounting or other advisors.

COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE

The Committee shall consist of three or more directors as determined from time to time by the Board. Each member of the Committee shall be qualified to serve on the Committee pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market or any exchange or national quotation system on which the common stock or any other equity securities of the Company are listed and any additional requirements that the Board deems appropriate.

Committee members shall be elected by the Board and may be replaced by the Board. Unless a Chair is elected by the full Board, the members of the Committee may designate a Chair by majority vote of the full Committee membership.

MEETINGS OF THE COMMITTEE

The Committee shall meet as often as it determines necessary to carry out its duties and responsibilities, but not less frequently than two times per annum. The Chair of the Committee and/or the Board may call such meetings.

A majority of the members of the Committee participating in the meeting in person or by telephone or video conference shall constitute a quorum.

The Committee shall maintain minutes of its meetings and records relating to those meetings.

29

---

Table of Contents

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COMMITTEE

The following shall be the common recurring activities of the Committee in carrying out its oversight function. These activities are set forth as a guide with the understanding that the Committee may diverge from this guide as appropriate to the extent permitted by applicable law or regulation.

	(a)	Evaluate the current composition, organization and governance of the Board and its committees, and make recommendations to the Board for approval.

	(b)	Determine desired Board member skills and attributes and conduct searches for prospective directors whose skills and attributes reflect those desired and evaluate and propose nominees for election to the Board. At a minimum, nominees for service on the Board must be well-regarded and experienced participants in their field(s) of specialty, familiar at the time of their appointment with the Company's business, willing to devote the time and attention necessary to deepen and refine their understanding of the Company and the issues facing it, and must have an understanding of the demands and responsibilities of service on a board of directors of a public company. In making such recommendations, the Committee will also consider such qualities as independence from the Company, as the definition of "independence" may be revised from time to time by the Nasdaq Stock Market or any other national exchange or national quotation system on which the common stock or any equity securities of the Company are listed. Each nominee will be considered both on his or her individual merits and in relation to existing or other potential members of the Board, with a view to establishing a well-rounded, diverse, knowledgeable, and experienced Board.

	(c)	Administer the annual Board performance evaluation process, including conducting surveys of director observations, suggestions and preferences.

	(d)	Evaluate and make recommendations to the Board concerning the appointment of directors to Board committees, the selection of Board committee chairs, and proposal of the slate of directors for election to the Board.

	(e)	Consider all bona fide candidates recommended by stockholders for nomination for election to the Board if they are accompanied by a comprehensive written resume of the recommended nominee's business experience and background, and a signed consent from the recommended nominee stating that he or he is willing to be considered as a nominee and, if nominated and elected, will serve as a director. The Committee will consider such candidates using the same screening criteria as are applied to all other potential nominees for election, provided that the stockholder nominations are submitted in a timely and complete manner, under the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Company's By-laws, as they may be amended from time to time.

	(f)	As necessary in the Committee's judgment from time to time, retain and compensate third party search firms to assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees to the Board.

	(g)	Evaluate and recommend termination of membership of individual directors in accordance with the Board's governance principles, for cause or for other appropriate reasons.

	(h)	Evaluate and consider matters relating to the qualifications of directors.

	(i)	Annually review and reassess the adequacy of the corporate governance guidelines of the Company and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for approval.

	(j)	Oversee the annual process of performance evaluations of the Company's management.

30

---

Table of Contents

	(k)	Oversee the process of succession planning for the Chief Executive Officer and, as warranted, other senior officers of the Company.

	(l)	Develop, adopt and oversee the implementation of a Corporate Code of Conduct and Ethics for all directors, executive officers and employees of the Company.

	(m)	Review and maintain oversight of matters relating to the independence of Board and committee members, keeping in mind the independence standards of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market or any other national exchange or national quotation system on which the common stock or any equity securities of the Company are listed.

	(n)	Oversee and assess the effectiveness of the relationship between the Board and Company management.

	(o)	Form and delegate authority to subcommittees when appropriate.

	(p)	Make regular reports to the Board concerning its activities.

	(q)	Annually review and reassess the adequacy of this Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for approval.

	(r)	Annually evaluate its own performance.

	(s)	Fulfill such other duties and responsibilities as may be assigned to the Committee, from time to time, by the Board and/or the Chairman of the Board.

**********************

Nothing contained in this Charter is intended to create, or should be construed as creating, any responsibility or liability of the members of the Committee, except to the extent otherwise provided under applicable federal or state law.

31

---

Table of Contents

MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY

160 Raritan Center Parkway
Edison, New Jersey 08837

PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

JUNE 20, 2006

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY SOLICITS THIS PROXY

The undersigned, revoking any previous proxies relating to these shares, hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice and Proxy Statement in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 20, 2006, at the Sheraton Edison Hotel Raritan Center, 125 Raritan Center Parkway, Edison, New Jersey 08837, and hereby appoints Adam Sultan, our General Counsel, Senior Vice President Business and Legal Affairs and Secretary, and Mary Magnani, our Director of Investor Relations, with full power to act alone, and each of them (with full power to act alone), as attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, with power of substitution to each, to vote all shares of the common stock of Majesco Entertainment Company registered in the name provided in this Proxy which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and at any adjournments of the meeting, with all the powers the undersigned would have if personally present at the meeting. Without limiting the general authorization given by this Proxy, the proxies are, and each of them is, instructed to vote or act as follows on the proposals set forth in the Proxy.

This Proxy when executed will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no direction is made this Proxy will be voted FOR Proposals 1 and 2.

In their discretion the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments of the meeting.

1.    Election of Class I Directors (or if any nominee is not available for election, such substitute as the Board of Directors may designate):

Proposal to elect nominees:

Morris Sutton				FOR				WITHOLD VOTE
Louis Lipschitz				FOR				WITHOLD VOTE
Marc Mazur				FOR				WITHOLD VOTE

2.    To ratify the appointment of Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP as our independent public accountants for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2006.

FOR				AGAINST				ABSTAIN

    Please mark votes as in this example.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposals 1 and 2.

Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.

Signature:______________________________________Date______________

Signature:______________________________________Date______________

PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!

32

---