UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

 

 

Form 10-K

 

 

 

 

 

Commission file number: 0-50150

 

 

 

 

CHS Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

 

 

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

 

8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
(Title of Class)

 

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Exchange Act).

 

YES o     NO þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

 

YES o     NO þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

YES þ     NO o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K:  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer o      Accelerated filer o     Non-accelerated filer þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 

YES o     NO þ

 

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter:

 

The registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity has no market value (the registrant is a member cooperative).

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: The registrant has no common stock outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

None.

 

 

INDEX

 

 

CHS Inc. (referred to herein as “CHS”, “we” or “us”) is one of the nation’s leading integrated agricultural companies. As a cooperative, we are owned by farmers and ranchers and their local cooperatives from the Great Lakes to the Pacific Northwest and from the Canadian border to Texas. We also have preferred stockholders that own shares of our 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, which is listed on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol CHSCP. On August 31, 2006, we had 5,864,238 shares of preferred stock outstanding. We buy commodities from and provide products and services to our members and other customers, both domestic and international. We provide a wide variety of products and services, from initial agricultural inputs such as fuels, farm supplies, crop nutrients and crop protection products, to agricultural outputs that include grains and oilseeds, grain and oilseed processing and food products. A portion of our operations are conducted through equity investments and joint ventures whose operating results are not fully consolidated with our results; rather, a proportionate share of the income or loss from those entities is included as a component in our net income under the equity method of accounting. For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006, our total revenues were $14.4 billion and net income was $490.3 million.

 

We have aligned our business segments based on an assessment of how our businesses operate and the products and services they sell. Our three business segments; Energy, Ag Business and Processing, create vertical integration to link producers with consumers. Our Energy segment derives its revenues through refining, wholesaling and retailing of petroleum products. Our Ag Business segment derives its revenues through the origination and marketing of grain, including service activities conducted at export terminals, through the retail sales of petroleum and agronomy products, processed sunflowers, feed and farm supplies, and records equity income from investments in our agronomy joint ventures, grain export joint ventures and other investments. Our Processing segment derives its revenues from the sales of soybean meal and soybean refined oil, and records equity income from two wheat milling joint ventures, a vegetable oil-based food manufacturing and distribution joint venture, and an ethanol manufacturing company. We include other business operations in Corporate and Other because of the nature of their products and services, as well as the relative revenue size of those businesses. These businesses primarily include our insurance, hedging and other service activities related to crop production.

 

In May 2005, we sold the majority of our Mexican foods business for proceeds of $38.3 million resulting in a loss on disposition of $6.2 million. During the year ended August 31, 2006, we sold all of the remaining assets for proceeds of $4.2 million and a gain of $1.6 million. The operating results of the Mexican foods business are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

 

Only producers of agricultural products and associations of producers of agricultural products may be our members. Our earnings derived from cooperative business are allocated to patrons based on the volume of business they do with us. We allocate these earnings to our members in the form of patronage refunds (which are also called patronage dividends) in cash and patron’s equities, which may be redeemed over time. Earnings derived from non-members, which are not allocated patronage, are taxed at federal and state statutory corporate rates and are retained by us as unallocated capital reserve. We also receive patronage refunds from the cooperatives in which we are a member, if those cooperatives have earnings to distribute and we qualify for patronage refunds from them.

 

Our origins date back to the early 1930s with the founding of the predecessor companies of Cenex, Inc. and Harvest States Cooperatives. CHS Inc. emerged as the result of the merger of the two entities in 1998, and is headquartered in Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota.

 

Our international sales information and segment information in Notes 2 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements are incorporated by reference into the following business segment descriptions.

The business segment financial information presented below may not represent the results that would have been obtained had the relevant business segment been operated as an independent business due to efficiencies in scale, corporate cost allocations and intersegment activity.

 

Overview

 

We are the nation’s largest cooperative energy company based on revenues and identifiable assets, with operations that include petroleum refining and pipelines; the supply, marketing (including ethanol and biodiesel) and distribution of refined fuels (gasoline, diesel and other energy products); the blending, sale and distribution of lubricants; and the wholesale supply of propane. Our Energy segment processes crude oil into refined petroleum products at refineries in Laurel, Montana (wholly-owned) and McPherson, Kansas (an entity in which we have an approximate 74.5% ownership interest) and sells those products under the Cenex brand to member cooperatives and others through a network of approximately 1,600 independent retail sites, including approximately 850 that operate Cenex/Ampride convenience stores.

 

Operations

 

Laurel Refinery.  Our Laurel, Montana refinery processes medium and high sulfur crude oil into refined petroleum products that primarily include gasoline, diesel and asphalt. Our Laurel refinery sources approximately 90% of its crude oil supply from Canada, with the balance obtained from domestic sources, and we have access to Canadian and northwest Montana crude through our wholly-owned Front Range Pipeline, LLC and other common carrier pipelines. Our Laurel refinery also has access to Wyoming crude via common carrier pipelines from the south.

 

Our Laurel facility processes approximately 55,000 barrels of crude oil per day to produce refined products that consist of approximately 39% gasoline, 31% diesel and other distillates, and 30% asphalt and other residual products. During fiscal 2005, the Board of Directors approved the installation of a coker unit at Laurel, along with other refinery improvements, which will allow us to extract a greater volume of high value gasoline and diesel fuel from a barrel of crude oil and less relatively low value asphalt. Total cost for this project is expected to be approximately $325.0 million, of which $62.8 million has been spent through August 31, 2006, with completion planned during fiscal 2008. Refined fuels produced at Laurel, Montana are available via the Yellowstone Pipeline to western Montana terminals and to Spokane and Moses Lake, Washington, south via common carrier pipelines to Wyoming terminals and Denver, Colorado, and east via our wholly-owned Cenex Pipeline, LLC to Glendive, Montana, and Minot and Fargo, North Dakota. Our Board of Directors has approved a $30 million capital expenditure to construct three product terminals tied into the Yellowstone Pipeline that include rail capability. This investment is being undertaken to preserve our long-term ability to participate in western markets.

 

McPherson Refinery.  The McPherson, Kansas refinery is owned and operated by National Cooperative Refinery Association (NCRA), of which we own approximately 74.5%. The McPherson refinery processes low and medium sulfur crude oil into gasoline, diesel and other distillates, propane and other products. McPherson sources approximately 90% of its crude oil from Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas through NCRA-owned and common carrier pipelines.

 

The McPherson refinery processes approximately 85,000 barrels of crude oil per day to produce refined products that consist of approximately 55% gasoline, 41% diesel and other distillates, and 4% propane and other products. Approximately 32% of the refined fuels are loaded into trucks at the McPherson refinery and shipped via NCRA’s proprietary products pipeline to its terminal in Council Bluffs, Iowa. The remaining refined fuel products are shipped to other markets via common carrier pipelines.

 

Provista Renewable Fuels Marketing, LLC.  We acquired a 50% ownership in an ethanol and biodiesel marketing and distribution company, Provista Renewable Fuels Marketing, LLC, (Provista) formally known as United Bio Energy Fuels, LLC. U.S. BioEnegy Corporation (US BioEnergy), of which we own approximately

25.6%, is the other 50% owner of Provista. Provista contracts with ethanol and biodiesel production plants, including US BioEnergy, to market and distribute their finished products. From the April 1, 2006, acquisition date through August 31, 2006, volume totaled 109.5 million gallons of ethanol. Provista is consolidated within our financial statements, and we guarantee Provista’s $20.0 million revolving credit facility. We are the operating manager of Provista.

 

Other Energy Operations.  We own and operate a propane terminal, four asphalt terminals, five refined product terminals and three lubricants blending and packaging facilities. We also own and lease a fleet of liquid and pressure trailers and tractors, which are used to transport refined fuels, propane, anhydrous ammonia and other products.

 

Products and Services

 

Our Energy segment produces and sells (primarily wholesale) gasoline, diesel, propane, asphalt, lubricants and other related products and provides transportation services. We obtain the petroleum products that we sell from our Laurel and McPherson refineries, and from third parties.

 

Sales and Marketing; Customers

 

We make approximately 70% of our refined fuel sales to members, with the balance sold to non-members. Sales are made wholesale to member cooperatives and through a network of independent retailers that operate convenience stores under the Cenex/Ampride tradename. We sold approximately 1.3 billion gallons of gasoline and approximately 1.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in fiscal year 2006. We also blend, package and wholesale auto and farm machinery lubricants to both members and non-members. In our fiscal year 2006, our lubricants operations sold approximately 20.2 million gallons of lube oil. We are one of the nation’s largest propane wholesalers based on revenues. In our fiscal year 2006, our propane operations sold approximately 716 million gallons of propane. Most of the propane sold in rural areas is for heating and agricultural usage. Annual sales volumes of propane vary greatly depending on weather patterns and crop conditions.

 

Industry; Competition

 

Regulation.  Governmental regulations and policies, particularly in the areas of taxation, energy and the environment, have a significant impact on our Energy segment. Our Energy segment’s operations are subject to laws and related regulations and rules designed to protect the environment that are administered by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Transportation and similar government agencies. These laws, regulations and rules govern the discharge of materials to the environment, air and water; reporting storage of hazardous wastes; the transportation, handling and disposition of wastes; and the labeling of pesticides and similar substances. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and rules could subject us (and, in the case of the McPherson refinery, NCRA) to administrative penalties, injunctive relief, civil remedies and possible recalls of products. We believe that we and NCRA are in compliance with these laws, regulations and rules in all material respects and do not expect continued compliance to have a material effect on capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position of either us or NCRA.

 

Like many other refineries, our Energy segment’s refineries recently focused their capital spending on reducing pollution and at the same time increasing production to pay for those expenditures. In particular, our refineries have completed work to comply with the Environmental Protection Agency low sulfur fuel regulations required by 2006, which are intended to lower the sulfur content of gasoline and diesel. We incurred capital expenditures from fiscal year 2003 through 2006 related to this compliance of $88.1 million for our Laurel, Montana refinery and $328.7 million for NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refinery.

 

The petroleum business is highly cyclical. Demand for crude oil and energy products is driven by the condition of local and worldwide economies, local and regional weather patterns and taxation relative to other energy sources which can significantly affect the price of refined fuels products. Most of our energy product market is located in rural areas, so sales activity tends to follow the planting and harvesting cycles. More fuel-

efficient equipment, reduced crop tillage, depressed prices for crops, weather conditions and government programs which encourage idle acres may all reduce demand for our energy products.

 

The petroleum refining and wholesale fuels business is very competitive. Among our competitors are some of the world’s largest integrated petroleum companies, which have their own crude oil supplies, distribution and marketing systems. We also compete with smaller domestic refiners and marketers in the midwestern and northwestern United States, with foreign refiners who import products into the United States and with producers and marketers in other industries supplying other forms of energy and fuels to consumers. Given the commodity nature of the end products, profitability in the refining and marketing industry depends largely on margins, as well as operating efficiency, product mix, and costs of product distribution and transportation. The retail gasoline market is highly competitive, with much larger competitors that have greater brand recognition and distribution outlets throughout the country and the world. Our owned and non-owned retail outlets are located primarily in the northwestern, midwestern and southern United States.

 

Summary Operating Results

 

Summary operating results and identifiable assets for our Energy segment for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are shown below:

 

 

Our Ag Business segment includes agronomy, country operations and grain marketing.

 

Agronomy

 

Overview

 

We conduct our wholesale and some of our retail agronomy operations through our 50% ownership interest in Agriliance LLC (Agriliance). Land O’Lakes, Inc. (Land O’Lakes) holds the other 50% ownership interest. Agriliance is one of North America’s largest wholesale distributors of crop nutrients, crop protection products and other agronomy products based upon annual sales. Our 50% ownership interest in Agriliance is treated as an equity method investment, and therefore, Agriliance’s revenues and expenses are not reflected in our operating results. At August 31, 2006, our equity investment in Agriliance was $175.3 million. Agriliance has its own line of financing, without recourse to us.

 

In August 2005, we sold 81% of our 20% ownership interest in CF Industries, Inc. (CF), a crop nutrients manufacturer and distributor, in an initial public offering. After the initial public offering, our ownership

interest in the company was reduced to approximately 3.9%. Subsequent to our fiscal year ended August 31, 2006, we sold 540,000 shares of our CF stock for proceeds of $10.9 million, and recorded a gain of $5.3 million, with a remaining ownership interest in CF of approximately 2.9%. Prior to the initial public offering, Agriliance entered into a multi-year supply contract with CF, and as a result, given our small ownership interest in the company, we now consider the relationship to be as a supplier rather than a strategic joint venture.

 

There is significant seasonality in the sale of crop nutrients and crop protection products and services, with peak activity coinciding with the planting and input seasons.

 

Operations

 

Agriliance is one of the nation’s largest wholesale distributors of crop nutrients (fertilizers) and crop protection products (insecticides, fungicides and pesticides) based on sales, accounting for an estimated 15% of the US market for crop nutrients and approximately 23% of the US market for crop protection products. As a wholesale distributor, Agriliance has warehouse, distribution and service facilities located throughout the country. Agriliance also owns and operates retail agricultural units primarily in the southern United States. In addition, Agriliance blends and packages crop protection products under the Agri Solutions brand. Agriliance purchased approximately 28% of its fertilizer from CF during fiscal year 2006, and its other suppliers include Mosaic, PCS, PIC and Koch. Most of Agriliance’s crop protection products are purchased from Monsanto, Syngenta, Dow, Bayer, Dupont and BASF.

 

Products and Services

 

Agriliance sells nitrogen and potassium based crop nutrients products as well as crop protection products that include insecticides, fungicides and pesticides. In addition, Agriliance blends and packages 9% of the products it sells under the Agri Solutions brand. Agriliance also provides field and technical services, including soil testing, adjuvant and herbicide formulation, application and related services.

 

Sales and Marketing; Customers

 

Agriliance distributes agronomy products through approximately 2,200 local cooperatives from Ohio to the West Coast and from the Canadian border south to Kansas. Agriliance also provides sales and services through more than 50 strategically located Agriliance Service Centers as well as nearly 150 company-owned retail locations. Agriliance’s largest customer is our country operations business, also included in our Ag Business segment. In 2006, Agriliance had total revenues of $3.7 billion, of which approximately $1.8 billion was crop nutrient products and approximately $1.9 billion was crop protection and other products.

 

Industry; Competition

 

Regulation.  The agronomy operations are subject to laws and related regulations and rules designed to protect the environment that are administered by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Transportation and similar government agencies. These laws, regulations and rules govern the discharge of materials to the environment, air and water; reporting storage of hazardous wastes; the transportation, handling and disposition of wastes; and the labeling of pesticides and similar substances. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and rules could subject Agriliance or us to administrative penalties, injunctive relief, civil remedies and possible recalls of products. We believe that Agriliance is in compliance with these laws, regulations and rules in all material respects and do not expect continued compliance to have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

 

The wholesale and retail distribution of agronomy products is highly competitive and dependent upon relationships with agricultural producers, local cooperatives and growers, proximity to producers and local cooperatives and competitive pricing. Moreover, the crop protection products industry is mature with slow growth predicted for the future, which has led distributors and suppliers to turn to consolidation and strategic partnerships to benefit from economies of scale and increased market share. Agriliance competes with other large agronomy distributors, as well as other regional or local distributors and retailers. Agriliance competes

on the strength of its relationships with CHS and Land O’Lakes members, its purchasing power and competitive pricing, and its attention to service in the field.

 

Major competitors of Agriliance in crop nutrient distribution include Agrium, Mosaic, Koch, UAP and United Suppliers. Major competitors of Agriliance in crop protection products distribution include Helena, UAP, Tenkoz and numerous smaller distribution companies.

 

Country Operations

 

Overview

 

Our country operations business purchases a variety of grains from our producer members and other third parties, and provides cooperative members and producers with access to a full range of products and services including farm supplies and programs for crop and livestock production. Country operations operates at 325 locations, which includes 3 sunflower plants, dispersed throughout Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Colorado, Idaho, Washington and Oregon. Most of these locations purchase grain from farmers and sell agronomy products, energy products and feed to those same producers and others, although not all locations provide every product and service.

 

Products and Services

 

Grain Purchasing.  We are one of the largest country elevator operators in North America based on revenues. Through a majority of our elevator locations, the country operations business purchases grain from member and non-member producers and other elevators and grain dealers. Most of the grain purchased is either sold through our grain marketing operations or used for local feed and processing operations. For the year ended August 31, 2006, country operations purchased approximately 367 million bushels of grain, primarily wheat (184 million bushels), corn (98 million bushels) and soybeans (43 million bushels). Of these bushels, 338 million were purchased from members and 294 million were sold through our grain marketing operations.

 

Other Products.  Our country operations business manufactures and sells other products, both directly and through ownership interests in other entities. These include seed, crop nutrients, crop protection products, energy products, animal feed, animal health products and processed sunflowers. We sell agronomy products at 178 locations, feed products at 130 locations and energy products at 120 locations.

 

Fin-Ag, Inc.  In the past, through our wholly-owned subsidiary Fin-Ag, Inc., we provided seasonal cattle feeding and swine financing loans, facility financing loans and crop production loans to our members. Most of these loans were sold to ProPartners (an affiliate of CoBank) under a financing program in which we guarantee a portion of the loans. Financing activity through Fin-Ag, Inc. has decreased substantially as most of the production loans were contributed to Cofina Financial, LLC (Cofina), a 49% owned joint venture that was formed during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005 (see “Corporate and Other” section below). The only activity of Fin-Ag, Inc. is seasonal cattle feeding financing and a small amount of crop loans not transferred to Cofina.

 

Industry; Competition

 

Regulation.  Our country operations business is subject to laws and related regulations and rules designed to protect the environment that are administered by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Transportation and similar government agencies. These laws, regulations and rules govern the discharge of materials to the environment, air and water; reporting storage of hazardous wastes; the transportation, handling and disposition of wastes; and the labeling of pesticides and similar substances. Our country operations business is also subject to laws and related regulations and rules administered by the United States Department of Agriculture, the Federal Food and Drug Administration, and other federal, state, local and foreign governmental agencies that govern the processing, packaging, storage, distribution, advertising, labeling, quality and safety of feed and grain products. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and rules could subject us to administrative penalties, injunctive relief, civil remedies and possible recalls of products. We

believe that we are in compliance with these laws, regulations and rules in all material respects and do not expect continued compliance to have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

 

Competition.  Competitors for the purchase of grain include other elevators and large grain marketing companies. Competitors for farm supply include a variety of other cooperatives, privately held and large national companies. We compete primarily on the basis of price, services and patronage.

 

Grain Marketing

 

Overview

 

We are the nation’s largest cooperative marketer of grain and oilseed based on grain storage capacity and grain sales, handling about 1.4 billion bushels annually. During fiscal year 2006, we purchased approximately 64% of our total grain volumes from individual and cooperative association members and our country operations business, with the balance purchased from third parties. We arrange for the transportation of the grains either directly to customers or to our owned or leased grain terminals and elevators awaiting delivery to domestic and foreign purchasers. We primarily conduct our grain marketing operations directly, but do conduct some of our business through joint ventures.

 

Operations

 

Our grain marketing operations purchases grain directly and indirectly from agricultural producers primarily in the midwestern and western United States. The purchased grain is typically contracted for sale for future delivery at a specified location, and we are responsible for handling the grain and arranging for its transportation to that location. The sale of grain is recorded after title to the commodity has transferred and final weights, grades and settlement price have been agreed upon. Amounts billed to the customer as part of a sales transaction include the costs for shipping and handling. Our ability to arrange efficient transportation, including loading capabilities onto unit trains, ocean-going vessels and barges, is a significant part of the services we offer to our customers. Rail, vessel, barge and truck transportation is carried out by third parties, often under long-term freight agreements with us. Grain intended for export is usually shipped by rail or barge to an export terminal, where it is loaded onto ocean-going vessels. Grain intended for domestic use is usually shipped by rail or truck to various locations throughout the country.

 

We own and operate export terminals, river terminals and elevators involved in the handling and transport of grain. Our river terminals at Savage and Winona, Minnesota, and Davenport, Iowa are used to load grains onto barges for shipment to both domestic and export customers via the Mississippi River system. Our export terminal at Superior, Wisconsin provides access to the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway, and our export terminal at Myrtle Grove, Louisiana serves the Gulf market. In the Pacific Northwest, we conduct our grain marketing operations through United Harvest, LLC (a 50% joint venture with United Grain Corporation), and TEMCO, LLC (a 50% joint venture with Cargill, Incorporated). United Harvest, LLC, operates grain terminals in Vancouver and Kalama, Washington, and primarily exports wheat. TEMCO, LLC operates an export terminal in Tacoma, Washington, and primarily exports corn and soybeans. These facilities serve the Pacific market, as well as domestic grain customers in the western United States. We also own two 110-car shuttle-receiving elevator facilities in Friona, Texas and Collins, Mississippi that serve large-scale feeder cattle, dairy and poultry producers in those regions. In 2003, we opened an office in Sao Paulo, Brazil for the procurement of soybeans for our grain marketing operations international customers.

 

Subsequent to the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006, we invested approximately $30.0 million in a Brazil-based grain handling and merchandising company named Multigrain S.A., that will be owned jointly (50/50) with Multigrain Comercio, an agricultural commodities business headquartered in Sao Paulo, Brazil. This venture which includes grain storage and export facilities, builds on our South American soybean origination and helps meet customer needs year-round. Our grain marketing operations continue to explore other opportunities to establish a presence in other emerging grain origination and export markets.

Our grain marketing operations purchases most of its grain during the summer and fall harvest period. Because of our geographic location and the fact that we are further from our export facilities, the grain that we handle tends to be sold later after the harvest period than in other parts of the country. However, as many producers have significant on-farm storage capacity and in light of our own storage capacity, our grain marketing operations buys and ships grain throughout the year. Due to the amount of grain purchased and held in inventory, our grain marketing operations has significant working capital needs at various times of the year. The amount of borrowings for this purpose, and the interest rate charged on those borrowings, directly affects the profitability of our grain marketing operations.

 

Products and Services

 

The primary grains purchased by our grain marketing operations for the year ended August 31, 2006 were corn (491 million bushels), wheat (442 million bushels) and soybeans (350 million bushels). Of the total grains purchased by our grain marketing operations during the year ended August 31, 2006, 561 million bushels were purchased from our individual and cooperative association members, 294 million bushels were purchased from our country operations business, and the remainder was purchased from third parties.

 

Sales and Marketing; Customers

 

Purchasers of our grain and oilseed include domestic and foreign millers, maltsters, feeders, crushers and other processors. To a much lesser extent purchasers include intermediaries and distributors. Our grain marketing operations are not dependent on any one customer, and its supply relationships call for delivery of grain at prevailing market prices.

 

Industry; Competition

 

Regulation.  Our grain marketing operations are subject to laws and related regulations and rules designed to protect the environment that are administered by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Transportation and similar government agencies. These laws, regulations and rules govern the discharge of materials to environment, air and water; reporting storage of hazardous wastes; and the transportation, handling and disposition of wastes. Our grain marketing operations are also subject to laws and related regulations and rules administered by the United States Department of Agriculture, the Federal Food and Drug Administration, and other federal, state, local and foreign governmental agencies that govern the processing, packaging, storage, distribution, advertising, labeling, quality and safety of food and grain products. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and rules could subject us to administrative penalties, injunctive relief, civil remedies and possible recalls of products. We believe that we are in compliance with these laws, regulations and rules in all material respects and do not expect continued compliance to have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

 

Competition.  Our grain marketing operations compete for both the purchase and the sale of grain. Competition is intense and margins are low. Some competitors are integrated food producers, which may also be customers. A few major competitors have substantially greater financial resources than we have.

 

In the purchase of grain from producers, location of the delivery facility is a prime consideration, but producers are increasingly willing to transport grain longer distances for sale. Price is affected by the capabilities of the facility; for example, if it is cheaper to deliver to a customer by unit train than by truck, a facility with unit train capabilities provides a price advantage. We believe that our relationships with individual members serviced by our local country operations locations and with our cooperative members give us a broad origination capability.

 

Our grain marketing operations competes for grain sales based on price, services and ability to provide the desired quantity and quality of grains. Location of facilities is a major factor in the ability to compete. Our grain marketing operations competes with numerous grain merchandisers, including major grain merchandising companies such as Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), Cargill, Incorporated (Cargill), ConAgra, Bunge and Louis Dreyfus, each of which handle grain volumes of more than one billion bushels annually.

The results of our grain marketing operations may be adversely affected by relative levels of supply and demand, both domestic and international, commodity price levels (including grain prices reported on national markets) and transportation costs and conditions. Supply is affected by weather conditions, disease, insect damage, acreage planted and government regulations and policies. Demand may be affected by foreign governments and their programs, relationships of foreign countries with the United States, the affluence of foreign countries, acts of war, currency exchange fluctuations and substitution of commodities. Demand may also be affected by changes in eating habits, by population growth, and by increased or decreased per capita consumption of some products.

 

Summary Operating Results

 

Summary operating results and identifiable assets for our Ag Business segment for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are shown below:

 

 

Overview

 

Our Processing segment converts raw agricultural commodities into ingredients for finished food products or into finished consumer food products. We have focused on areas that allow us to utilize the products supplied by our member producers. These areas are oilseed processing, wheat milling, foods and renewable fuels.

 

Regulation.  Our Processing segment’s operations are subject to laws and related regulations and rules designed to protect the environment that are administered by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Transportation and similar government agencies. These laws, regulations and rules govern the discharge of materials to environment, air and water; reporting storage of hazardous wastes; and the transportation, handling and disposition of wastes. Our Processing segment’s operations are also subject to laws and related regulations and rules administered by the United States Department of Agriculture, the Federal Food and Drug Administration, and other federal, state, local and foreign governmental agencies that govern the processing, packaging, storage, distribution, advertising, labeling, quality and safety of food and grain products. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and rules could subject us, or our foods partners, or our renewable fuels partners to administrative penalties, injunctive relief, civil remedies and possible recalls of products. We believe that we are in compliance with these laws, regulations and rules in all material

respects and do not expect continued compliance to have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

 

Oilseed Processing

 

Our oilseed processing operations convert soybeans into soybean meal, soyflour, crude soyoil, refined soybean oil and associated by-products. These operations are conducted at a facility in Mankato, Minnesota that can crush approximately 39 million bushels of soybeans on an annual basis, producing approximately 940,000 short tons of soybean meal and 460 million pounds of crude soybean oil. The same facility is able to process approximately 1 billion pounds of refined soybean oil annually. Another crushing facility in Fairmont, Minnesota has a crushing capacity of over 45 million bushels or soybeans on an annual basis and became operational in the first quarter of our fiscal year 2004.

 

Our oilseed processing operations produce three primary products: refined oils, soybean meal and soyflour. Refined oils are used in processed foods, such as margarine, shortening, salad dressings and baked goods, as well as methyl ester/biodiesel production, and to a lesser extent, for certain industrial uses such as plastics, inks and paints. Soybean meal has high protein content and is used for feeding livestock. Soyflour is used in the baking industry, as a milk replacement in animal feed and in industrial applications.

 

Our soy processing facilities are located in areas with a strong production base of soybeans and end-user market for the meal and soyflour. We purchase virtually all of our soybeans from members. Our oilseed crushing operations currently produce approximately 90% of the crude oil that we refine, and purchase the balance from outside suppliers.

 

Our customers for refined oil are principally large food product companies located throughout the United States. However, over 50% of our customers are located in the Midwest due to relatively lower freight costs and slightly higher profitability potential. Our largest customer for refined oil products is Ventura Foods, LLC (Ventura Foods), in which we hold a 50% ownership interest and with which we have a long-term supply agreement to supply minimum quantities of edible soybean oils as long as we maintain a minimum 25.5% ownership interest and our price is competitive with other suppliers of the product. Our sales to Ventura Foods were $64.7 million in fiscal year 2006. We also sell soymeal to about 400 customers, primarily feed lots and feed mills in southern Minnesota. In fiscal 2006, Commodity Specialists Company accounted for 22% of soymeal sold and Land O’Lakes/Purina Feed, LLC accounted for 15% of soymeal sold. We sell soyflour to customers in the baking industry both domestically and for export.

 

The refined soybean products industry is highly competitive. Major industry competitors include ADM, Cargill, Ag Processing Inc., and Bunge. These and other competitors have acquired other processors and have expanded existing plants, or have constructed new plants, both domestically and internationally. Price, transportation costs, services and product quality drive competition. We estimate that we have a market share of approximately 4% to 5% of the domestic refined soybean oil market and approximately 4% of the domestic soybean crushing capacity.

 

Soybeans are a commodity and their price can fluctuate significantly depending on production levels, demand for the products, and other supply factors.

 

Wheat Milling

 

In January 2002, we formed a joint venture with Cargill named Horizon Milling, LLC (Horizon Milling), in which we hold an ownership interest of 24%, with Cargill owning the remaining 76%. Horizon Milling is the largest US wheat miller based on output volume. We own five mills that we lease to Horizon Milling. Sales and purchases of wheat and durum by us to Horizon Milling during our fiscal year 2006 were $251.5 million and $5.6 million, respectively. Horizon Milling’s advance payments on grain to us were $7.6 million on August 31, 2006, and are included in Customer Advance Payments on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We account for Horizon Milling using the equity method of accounting. At August 31, 2006, our value of assets leased to Horizon Milling was $82.0 million.

Subsequent to the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006, we invested $15.6 million in a new Horizon Milling venture (24% CHS ownership) that acquired the Canadian grain-based foodservice and industrial businesses of Smucker Foods of Canada, a wholly owned subsidiary of J.M. Smucker Company, which includes three flour milling operations and two dry baking mixing facilities in Canada.

 

Foods

 

Our primary focus in the foods area is Ventura Foods, which produces and distributes vegetable oil-based products such as margarine, salad dressing and other food products. Ventura Foods was created in 1996, and is owned 50% by us and 50% by Wilsey Foods, Inc., a majority owned subsidiary of Mitsui & Co., Ltd. We account for our Ventura Foods investment under the equity method of accounting, and at August 31, 2006, our investment was $132.2 million.

 

Ventura Foods manufactures, packages, distributes and markets bulk margarine, salad dressings, mayonnaise, salad oils, syrups, soup bases and sauces, many of which utilize soybean oil as a primary ingredient. Approximately 45% of Ventura Foods’ volume, based on sales, comes from products for which Ventura Foods owns the brand, and the remainder comes from products that it produces for third parties. A variety of Ventura Foods’ product formulations and processes are proprietary to it or its customers. Ventura Foods is the largest manufacturer of margarine for the foodservice sector in the US and is a major producer of many other products.

 

Ventura Foods has 13 manufacturing and distribution locations across the United States. It sources its raw materials, which consist primarily of soybean oil, canola oil, cottonseed oil, peanut oil and various other ingredients and supplies, from various national suppliers, including our oilseed processing operations. It sells the products it manufactures to third parties as a contract manufacturer, as well as directly to retailers, food distribution companies and large institutional food service companies. Ventura Foods sales are approximately 60% in foodservice and the remainder split between retail and industrial customers who use edible oil products as ingredients in foods they manufacture for resale. During Ventura Foods’ 2006 fiscal year, Sysco accounted for 22% of its net sales. During our fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005, Ventura Foods purchased two Dean Foods businesses: Marie’s dressings and Dean’s dips. The transaction included a license agreement for Ventura Foods to use the Dean’s trademark on dips.

 

Ventura Foods competes with a variety of large companies in the food manufacturing industry. Some of its major competitors are ADM, Cargill, Bunge, Unilever, ConAgra, ACH Food Companies, Smuckers, Kraft and CF Sauer, Ken’s, Marzetti and Nestle.

 

Renewable Fuels

 

During 2006, we invested $70.0 million in US BioEnergy Corporation (US BioEnergy), an ethanol manufacturing company, representing an approximate 24% ownership on August 31, 2006. On September 1, 2006, we acquired additional shares of Class A Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $35.0 million. This brings our total investment in US BioEnergy to $105.0 million, representing 25.57% of the outstanding shares. We account for this investment using the equity method of accounting.

 

US BioEnergy currently has two ethanol plants in operation, one in Woodbury, Michigan and the other in Central City, Nebraska. In addition, there are three ethanol plants under construction in Albert City, Iowa, Ord, Nebraska and Hankinson, North Dakota and an expansion project in progress at the plant in Central City, Nebraska. US BioEnergy has also announced plans to build additional ethanol plants in the Midwest.

 

In August 2006, US BioEnergy filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register shares of common stock for sale in an initial public offering, but it has not yet become effective.

Summary Operating Results

 

Summary operating results and identifiable assets for our Processing segment for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are shown below:

 

 

Services

 

Financial Services.  We have provided open account financing to more than 130 of our members that are cooperatives (cooperative association members) in the past year. These arrangements involve the discretionary extension of credit in the form of a clearing account for settlement of grain purchases and as a cash management tool.

 

In the past, we have made seasonal and term loans to member cooperatives. Some of these loans were sold to CoBank, and we guarantee a portion of the loans sold. Currently, these loans are made by Cofina, a joint venture finance company in which we hold a 49% ownership interest.

 

During the fourth quarter of our fiscal year 2005, we contributed certain assets related to our financial services business and related to Fin-Ag Inc., along with cash, to form Cofina. Cenex Finance Association, which prior to the formation of Cofina operated as an independent finance company, owns the other 51% of Cofina, however, the governance of this joint venture is 50/50. We participated in the formation of Cofina for the purpose of expanding the size of our financing platform, to improve the scope of services offered to customers, to gain efficiencies in sourcing funds, and to achieve some synergistic savings through participation in larger customer-financing programs. We account for our Cofina investment using the equity method of accounting.

 

We may, at our own discretion, choose to guarantee certain loans made by Cofina. On August 31, 2006, we had guarantees related to Cofina loans totaling $31.3 million. Guarantees for other loans that were not transferred to Cofina were $91 thousand on August 31, 2006.

 

Country Hedging, Inc.  Our wholly-owned subsidiary Country Hedging, Inc., which is a registered futures commission merchant and a clearing member of both the Minneapolis Grain Exchange and the Kansas City Board of Trade, is a full-service commodity futures and options broker.

 

Ag States Agency, LLC.  Ag States Agency, LLC, is an independent insurance agency, and after the purchase of the minority owner’s interest during our fiscal year 2005, is now a wholly-owned subsidiary. It sells insurance, including group benefits, property and casualty, and bonding programs. Its approximately 1,800 customers are primarily agricultural businesses, including local cooperatives and independent elevators,

petroleum outlets, agronomy, feed and seed plants, implement dealers, fruit and vegetable packers/warehouses, and food processors.

 

When we enter into a commodity purchase commitment, we incur risks of carrying inventory, including risks related to price changes and performance (including delivery, quality, quantity and shipment period). We are exposed to risk of loss in the market value of positions held, consisting of inventory and purchase contracts at a fixed or partially fixed price in the event market prices decrease. We are also exposed to risk of loss on our fixed price or partially fixed price sales contracts in the event market prices increase.

 

To reduce the price change risks associated with holding fixed price commitments, we generally take opposite and offsetting positions by entering into commodity futures contracts (either a straight futures contract or an options futures contract) on regulated commodity futures exchanges for grain, and regulated mercantile exchanges for refined products and crude oil. The crude oil and most of the grain and oilseed volume we handle can be hedged. Some grains cannot be hedged because there are no futures for certain commodities. For those commodities, risk is managed through the use of forward sales and various pricing arrangements and to some extent cross-commodity futures hedging. While hedging activities reduce the risk of loss from changing market values of inventory, such activities also limit the gain potential which otherwise could result from changes in market prices of inventory. Our policy is to generally maintain hedged positions in grain. Our profitability from operations is primarily derived from margins on products sold and grain merchandised, not from hedging transactions. Hedging arrangements do not protect against nonperformance by counterparties to contracts, and therefore, contract values are reviewed and adjusted to reflect potential non-performance.

 

When a futures contract is entered into, an initial margin deposit must be sent to the applicable exchange or broker. The amount of the deposit is set by the exchange and varies by commodity. If the market price of a short futures contract increases, then an additional maintenance margin deposit would be required. Similarly, if the price of a long futures contract decreases, a maintenance margin deposit would be required and sent to the applicable exchange. Subsequent price changes could require additional maintenance margins or could result in the return of maintenance margins.

 

At any one time, inventory and purchase contracts for delivery to us may be substantial. We have risk management policies and procedures that include net position limits. These limits are defined for each commodity and include both trader and management limits. This policy, and computerized procedures in our grain marketing operations, requires a review by operations management when any trader is outside of position limits and also a review by our senior management if operating areas are outside of position limits. A similar process is used in our energy operations. The position limits are reviewed at least annually with our management. We monitor current market conditions and may expand or reduce our risk management policies or procedures in response to changes in those conditions. In addition, all purchase and sales contracts are subject to credit approvals and appropriate terms and conditions.

 

At August 31, 2006, we had approximately 6,540 full, part-time, temporary and seasonal employees, which included approximately 590 employees of NCRA. Of that total, approximately 1,930 were employed in our Energy segment, 3,560 in our country operations business (including approximately 1,115 seasonal and temporary employees), 420 in our grain marketing operations, 260 in our Processing segment and 370 in Corporate and Other. In addition to those employed directly by us, many employees work for joint ventures in which we have a 50% or less ownership interest, and are not included in these totals. A portion of all of our business segments are employed in this manner.

 

Employees in certain areas are represented by collective bargaining agreements. Refinery and pipeline workers in Laurel, Montana are represented by agreements with two unions: United Steel Workers of America (USWA) (169 employees) and Oil Basin Pipeliners Union (OBP) (17 employees), for which agreements are in place through 2008 and 2007, respectively, in regards to wages and benefits. The contracts covering the NCRA

McPherson, Kansas refinery (274 employees in the USWA union) are also in place through 2009. There are approximately 160 employees in transportation and lubricant plant operations that are covered by other collective bargaining agreements that expire at various times. Certain production workers in our oilseed processing operations are subject to collective bargaining agreements with the Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Worker and Grain Millers (BTWGM) (108 employees) and the Pipefitters’ Union (2 employees) for which agreements are in place through 2009. The BTWGM also represents 52 employees at our Superior, WI grain export terminal with a contract expiring in 2010. The USWA represents 48 employees at our Myrtle Grove, LA grain export terminal with a contract expiring in 2009, the Teamsters represent 8 employees at our Winona, MN export terminal with a contract expiring in 2008, and the International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union (ILWU) represents 19 employees at our Kalama, WA export terminal with an expired contract since September 2006 that is currently being negotiated with expectations of a positive outcome. Finally, certain employees in our country operations business are represented by collective bargaining agreements with two unions; the BTWGM (26 employees), with contracts expiring in December 2008 and June 2010, and the United Food and Commercial Workers (10 employees), with a contract expiring in July 2008.

 

Introduction

 

We are an agricultural membership cooperative organized under Minnesota cooperative law to do business with member and non-member patrons. Our patrons, not us, are subject to income taxes on income from patronage sources. We are subject to income taxes on non-patronage-sourced income. See “— Tax Treatment” below.

 

Distribution of Net Income; Patronage Dividends

 

We are required by our organizational documents annually to distribute net earnings derived from patronage business with members, after payment of dividends on equity capital, to members on the basis of patronage, except that the Board of Directors may elect to retain and add to our unallocated capital reserve an amount not to exceed 10% of the distributable net income from patronage business. Net income from non-patronage business may be distributed to members or added to the unallocated capital reserve, in whatever proportions the Board of Directors deems appropriate.

 

These distributions, referred to as “patronage dividends,” may be made in cash, patrons’ equities, revolving fund certificates, our securities, securities of others, or any combination designated by the Board of Directors. Since 1998, the Board of Directors has distributed patronage dividends in the form of 30% cash and 70% patrons’ equities (see “— Patrons’ Equities” below). For fiscal year 2006, the Board of Directors has approved the upcoming distribution of patronage dividends in the form of 35% cash and 65% patrons’ equities. The Board of Directors may change the mix in the form of the patronage dividends in the future. In making distributions, the Board of Directors may use any method of allocation that, in its judgment, is reasonable and equitable.

 

Patronage dividends distributed during the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $207.8 million ($62.5 million in cash), $171.3 million ($51.6 million in cash) and $95.2 million ($28.7 million in cash), respectively.

 

Patrons’ Equities

 

Patrons’ equities are in the form of a book entry and represent a right to receive cash or other property when we redeem them. Patrons’ equities form part of our capital, do not bear interest, and are not subject to redemption upon request of a member. Patrons’ equities are redeemable only at the discretion of the Board of Directors and in accordance with the terms of the redemption policy adopted by the Board of Directors, which may be modified at any time without member consent. A policy was adopted effective September 1, 2004, whereby redemptions of capital equity certificates approved by the Board of Directors are divided into two

pools, one for non-individuals (primarily member cooperatives) who may participate in an annual pro-rata program for equities older than 10 years, and another for individual members who are eligible for equity redemptions at age 72 or upon death. Effective September 1, 2006, the 10-year aging factor on the retirement of equity on a pro-rata basis was eliminated for equity redemptions to be paid in fiscal year 2007. The amount that each non-individual member receives under the pro-rata program in any year will be determined by multiplying the dollars available for pro-rata redemptions, if any that year, as determined by the Board of Directors, by a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of patronage certificates eligible for redemption held by that member, and the denominator, of which is the sum of the patronage certificates eligible for redemption held by all eligible non-individual members. In addition to the annual pro-rata program, the Board of Directors has approved an additional $50.0 million of redemptions to be paid in fiscal year 2007, targeting older capital equity certificates. Approximately $40.2 million will be redeemed to active non-individual members, of which the oldest outstanding equity certificates will be redeemed through the year 1989. The balance will be available for the redemption of capital equity certificates held by individual members reaching the age of 72, or for the redemption of capital equity certificates held by the estates of deceased members.

 

Cash redemptions of patrons and other equities during the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $55.9 million, $23.7 million and $10.3 million, respectively. An additional $23.8 million, $20.0 and $13.0 million of equities were redeemed by issuance of shares of our 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock during the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

Governance

 

We are managed by a Board of Directors of not less than 17 persons elected by the members at our annual meeting. Terms of directors are staggered so that no more than seven directors are elected in any year, and after our 2006 elections, the maximum number of directors elected in any year will be six. The Board of Directors is currently comprised of 17 directors, however, there are two vacancies on the Board which will be filled at the 2006 annual meeting. Our articles of incorporation and bylaws may be amended only upon approval of a majority of the votes cast at an annual or special meeting of our members, except for the higher vote described under “— Certain Antitakeover Measures” below.

 

Membership

 

Membership in CHS is restricted to certain producers of agricultural products and to associations of producers of agricultural products that are organized and operating so as to adhere to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Act and the Capper-Volstead Act, as amended. The Board of Directors may establish other qualifications for membership, as it may from time to time deem advisable.

 

As a membership cooperative, we do not have common stock. We may issue equity or debt securities, on a patronage basis or otherwise, to our members. We have two classes of outstanding membership. Individual members are individuals actually engaged in the production of agricultural products. Cooperative associations are associations of agricultural producers and may be either cooperatives or other associations organized and operated under the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Act and the Capper-Volstead Act.

 

Voting Rights

 

Voting rights arise by virtue of membership, not because of ownership of any equity or debt security. Members that are cooperative associations are entitled to vote based upon a formula that takes into account the equity held by the cooperative in CHS and the average amount of business done with us over the previous three years.

 

Members who are individuals are entitled to one vote each. Individual members may exercise their voting power directly or through a patrons’ association affiliated with a grain elevator, feed mill, seed plant or any other of our facilities (with certain historical exceptions) recognized by the Board of Directors. The number of votes of patrons’ associations is determined under the same formula as cooperative association members.

Most matters submitted to a vote of the members require the approval of a majority of the votes cast at a meeting of the members, although certain actions require a greater vote. See “— Certain Antitakeover Measures” below.

 

Debt and Equity Instruments

 

We may issue debt and equity instruments to our current members and patrons, on a patronage basis or otherwise, and to persons who are neither members nor patrons. Capital Equity Certificates issued by us are subject to a first lien in favor of us for all indebtedness of the holder to us. On August 31, 2006, our outstanding capital included patrons’ equities (consisting of capital equity certificates and non-patronage earnings certificates), 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and certain capital reserves.

 

Distribution of Assets upon Dissolution; Merger and Consolidation

 

In the event of our dissolution, liquidation or winding up, whether voluntary or involuntary, all of our debts and liabilities would be paid first according to their respective priorities. After such payment, the holders of each share of our preferred stock would then be entitled to receive out of available assets up to $25.00 per share plus all dividends accumulated and unpaid on that share, whether or not declared, to and including the date of distribution. This distribution to the holders of our preferred stock would be made before any payment is made or assets distributed to the holders of any security that ranks junior to the preferred stock but after the payment of the liquidation preference of any of our securities that rank senior to the preferred stock. After such distribution to the holders of equity capital, any excess would be paid to patrons on the basis of their past patronage. The bylaws provide for the allocation among our members and nonmember patrons of the consideration received in any merger or consolidation to which we are a party.

 

Certain Antitakeover Measures

 

Our governing documents may be amended upon the approval of a majority of the votes cast at an annual or special meeting. However, if the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, declares that a proposed amendment to our governing documents involves or is related to a “hostile takeover,” the amendment must be adopted by 80% of the total voting power of our members.

 

The approval of not less than two-thirds of the votes cast at a meeting is required to approve a “change of control” transaction which would include a merger, consolidation, liquidation, dissolution, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. If the Board of Directors determines that a proposed change of control transaction involves a hostile takeover, the 80% approval requirement applies. The term “hostile takeover” is not further defined in the Minnesota cooperative law or our governing documents.

 

Tax Treatment

 

Subchapter T of the Internal Revenue Code sets forth rules for the tax treatment of cooperatives and applies to both cooperatives exempt from taxation under Section 521 of the Internal Revenue Code and to nonexempt corporations operating on a cooperative basis. We are a nonexempt cooperative.

 

As a cooperative, we are not taxed on qualified patronage (minimum cash requirement of 20%) allocated to our members either in the form of equities or cash. Consequently, those amounts are taxed only at the patron level. However, the amounts of any allocated but undistributed patronage earnings (called non-qualified unit retains) are taxable to us when allocated. Upon redemption of any non-qualified unit retains, the amount is deductible to us and taxable to the member.

 

Income derived by us from non-patronage sources is not entitled to the “single tax” benefit of Subchapter T and is taxed to us at corporate income tax rates.

 

NCRA is not consolidated for tax purposes.

 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS
OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

 

The information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2006, includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to CHS. In addition, CHS and its representatives and agents may from time to time make other written or oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and its reports to its members and securityholders. Words and phrases such as “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. We wish to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.

 

Our forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. This Cautionary Statement is for the purpose of qualifying for the “safe harbor” provisions of the Act and is intended to be a readily available written document that contains factors which could cause results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The following matters, among others, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations or prospects, financial or otherwise. Reference to this Cautionary Statement in the context of a forward-looking statement shall be deemed to be a statement that any one or more of the following factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those which might be projected, forecasted, estimated or budgeted by us in the forward-looking statement or statements.

 

The following factors are in addition to any other cautionary statements, written or oral, which may be made or referred to in connection with any particular forward-looking statement. The following review should not be construed as exhaustive.

 

We undertake no obligation to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.

 

OUR REVENUES AND OPERATING RESULTS COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY CHANGES IN COMMODITY PRICES.  Our revenues and earnings are affected by market prices for commodities such as crude oil, natural gas, grain, oilseeds, flour, and crude and refined vegetable oil. Commodity prices generally are affected by a wide range of factors beyond our control, including weather, disease, insect damage, drought, the availability and adequacy of supply, government regulation and policies, and general political and economic conditions. We are also exposed to fluctuating commodity prices as the result of our inventories of commodities, typically grain and petroleum products, and purchase and sale contracts at fixed or partially fixed prices. At any time, our inventory levels and unfulfilled fixed or partially fixed price contract obligations may be substantial. Increases in market prices for commodities that we purchase without a corresponding increase in the prices of our products or our sales volume or a decrease in our other operating expenses could reduce our revenues and net income.

 

In our energy operations, profitability depends largely on the margin between the cost of crude oil that we refine and the selling prices that we obtain for our refined products. Prices for both crude oil and for gasoline, diesel fuel and other refined petroleum products fluctuate widely. Factors influencing these prices, many of which are beyond our control, include:

 

 

 

The long-term effects of these and other conditions on the prices of crude oil and refined petroleum products are uncertain and ever-changing. Accordingly, we expect our margins on and the profitability of our energy business to fluctuate, possibly significantly, over time.

 

OUR OPERATING RESULTS COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED IF OUR MEMBERS WERE TO DO BUSINESS WITH OTHERS RATHER THAN WITH US.  We do not have an exclusive relationship with our members and our members are not obligated to supply us with their products or purchase products from us. Our members often have a variety of distribution outlets and product sources available to them. If our members were to sell their products to other purchasers or purchase products from other sellers, our revenues would decline and our results of operations could be adversely affected.

 

WE PARTICIPATE IN HIGHLY COMPETITIVE BUSINESS MARKETS IN WHICH WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO CONTINUE TO COMPETE SUCCESSFULLY.  We operate in several highly competitive business segments and our competitors may succeed in developing new or enhanced products that are better than ours, and may be more successful in marketing and selling their products than we are with ours. Competitive factors include price, service level, proximity to markets, product quality and marketing. In some of our business segments, such as Energy, we compete with companies that are larger, better known and have greater marketing, financial, personnel and other resources. As a result, we may not be able to continue to compete successfully with our competitors.

 

CHANGES IN FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS OR IN OUR TAX STATUS COULD INCREASE OUR TAX LIABILITY AND REDUCE OUR NET INCOME.  Current federal income tax laws, regulations and interpretations regarding the taxation of cooperatives, which allow us to exclude income generated through business with or for a member (patronage income) from our taxable income, could be changed. If this occurred, or if in the future we were not eligible to be taxed as a cooperative, our tax liability would significantly increase and our net income significantly decrease.

 

WE INCUR SIGNIFICANT COSTS IN COMPLYING WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. ANY FAILURE TO MAKE THE CAPITAL INVESTMENTS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH THESE LAWS AND REGULATIONS COULD EXPOSE US TO FINANCIAL LIABILITY.  We are subject to numerous federal, state and local provisions regulating our business and operations and we incur and expect to incur significant capital and operating expenses to comply with these laws and regulations. We may be unable to pass on those expenses to customers without experiencing volume and margin losses. For example, capital expenditures for upgrading our refineries, largely to comply with regulations requiring the reduction of sulfur levels in refined petroleum products, were completed in fiscal year 2006. We incurred capital expenditures from fiscal year 2003 through 2006 related to these upgrades of $88.1 million for our Laurel, Montana refinery and $328.7 million for the National Cooperative Refinery Association’s (NCRA) McPherson, Kansas refinery.

 

We establish reserves for the future cost of meeting known compliance obligations, such as remediation of identified environmental issues. However, these reserves may prove inadequate to meet our actual liability. Moreover, amended, new or more stringent requirements, stricter interpretations of existing requirements or the future discovery of currently unknown compliance issues may require us to make material expenditures or subject us to liabilities that we currently do not anticipate. Furthermore, our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could subject us to administrative penalties and injunctive relief, civil remedies including fines and injunctions, and recalls of our products.

 

ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR RESULTS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.  Many of our current and former facilities have been in operation for many years and, over that time, we and other operators of those facilities have generated, used, stored and disposed of substances or wastes that are or might be considered hazardous under applicable environmental laws, including chemicals

and fuels stored in underground and above-ground tanks. Any past or future actions in violation of applicable environmental laws could subject us to administrative penalties, fines and injunctions. Moreover, future or unknown past releases of hazardous substances could subject us to private lawsuits claiming damages and to adverse publicity.

 

ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED QUALITY, SAFETY OR HEALTH RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR PRODUCTS COULD SUBJECT US TO LIABILITY AND DAMAGE OUR BUSINESS AND REPUTATION.  If any of our food or feed products became adulterated or misbranded, we would need to recall those items and could experience product liability claims if consumers were injured as a result. A widespread product recall or a significant product liability judgment could cause our products to be unavailable for a period of time or a loss of consumer confidence in our products. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused illness or injury could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and our corporate and brand image. Moreover, claims or liabilities of this sort might not be covered by our insurance or by any rights of indemnity or contribution that we may have against others. In addition, general public perceptions regarding the quality, safety or health risks associated with particular food or feed products, such as concerns regarding genetically modified crops, could reduce demand and prices for some of the products associated with our businesses. To the extent that consumer preferences evolve away from products that our members or we produce for health or other reasons, such as the growing demand for organic food products, and we are unable to develop products that satisfy new consumer preferences, there will be a decreased demand for our products.

 

OUR OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO BUSINESS INTERRUPTIONS AND CASUALTY LOSSES; WE DO NOT INSURE AGAINST ALL POTENTIAL LOSSES AND COULD BE SERIOUSLY HARMED BY UNEXPECTED LIABILITIES.  Our operations are subject to business interruptions due to unanticipated events such as explosions, fires, pipeline interruptions, transportation delays, equipment failures, crude oil or refined product spills, inclement weather and labor disputes. For example:

 

 

We maintain insurance against many, but not all potential losses or liabilities arising from these operating hazards, but uninsured losses or losses above our coverage limits are possible. Uninsured losses and liabilities arising from operating hazards could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

 

OUR COOPERATIVE STRUCTURE LIMITS OUR ABILITY TO ACCESS EQUITY CAPITAL.  As a cooperative, we may not sell common equity in our company. In addition, existing laws and our articles of incorporation and bylaws contain limitations on dividends of 8% of any preferred stock that we may issue. These limitations restrict our ability to raise equity capital and may adversely affect our ability to compete with enterprises that do not face similar restrictions.

 

CONSOLIDATION AMONG THE PRODUCERS OF PRODUCTS WE PURCHASE AND CUSTOMERS FOR PRODUCTS WE SELL COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR REVENUES AND OPERATING RESULTS. Consolidation has occurred among the producers of products we purchase, including crude oil and grain, and it is likely to continue in the future. Consolidation could increase the price of these products and allow suppliers to negotiate pricing and other contract terms that are less favorable to us. Consolidation also may

increase the competition among consumers of these products to enter into supply relationships with a smaller number of producers resulting in potentially higher prices for the products we purchase.

 

Consolidation among purchasers of our products and in wholesale and retail distribution channels has resulted in a smaller customer base for our products and intensified the competition for these customers. For example, ongoing consolidation among distributors and brokers of food products and food retailers has altered the buying patterns of these businesses, as they have increasingly elected to work with product suppliers who can meet their needs nationwide rather than just regionally or locally. If these distributors, brokers and retailers elect not to purchase our products, our sales volumes, revenues and profitability could be significantly reduced.

 

IF OUR CUSTOMERS CHOSE ALTERNATIVES TO OUR REFINED PETROLEUM PRODUCTS OUR REVENUES AND PROFITS MAY DECLINE.  Numerous alternative energy sources currently under development could serve as alternatives to our gasoline, diesel fuel and other refined petroleum products. If any of these alternative products become more economically viable or preferable to our products for environmental or other reasons, demand for our energy products would decline. Demand for our gasoline, diesel fuel and other refined petroleum products also could be adversely affected by increased fuel efficiencies.

 

OPERATING RESULTS FROM OUR AGRONOMY BUSINESS COULD BE VOLATILE AND ARE DEPENDENT UPON CERTAIN FACTORS OUTSIDE OF OUR CONTROL.  Planted acreage, and consequently the volume of fertilizer and crop protection products applied, is partially dependent upon government programs and the perception held by the producer of demand for production. Weather conditions during the spring planting season and early summer spraying season also affect agronomy product volumes and profitability.

 

TECHNOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENTS IN AGRICULTURE COULD DECREASE THE DEMAND FOR OUR AGRONOMY AND ENERGY PRODUCTS.  Technological advances in agriculture could decrease the demand for crop nutrients, energy and other crop input products and services that we provide. Genetically engineered seeds that resist disease and insects, or that meet certain nutritional requirements, could affect the demand for our crop nutrients and crop protection products. Demand for fuel that we sell could decline as technology allows for more efficient usage of equipment.

 

WE OPERATE SOME OF OUR BUSINESS THROUGH JOINT VENTURES IN WHICH OUR RIGHTS TO CONTROL BUSINESS DECISIONS ARE LIMITED.  Several parts of our business, including in particular, our agronomy operations and portions of our grain marketing, wheat milling, foods and renewable fuels operations, are operated through joint ventures with third parties. By operating a business through a joint venture, we have less control over business decisions than we have in our wholly-owned or majority-owned businesses. In particular, we generally cannot act on major business initiatives in our joint ventures without the consent of the other party or parties in those ventures.

 

As of August 31, 2006, there were no unresolved comments from the SEC staff regarding our periodic or current reports.

 

We own or lease energy, grain handling and processing, and agronomy related facilities throughout the United States. Below is a summary of these locations.

 

Energy

 

Facilities in our Energy segment include the following, all of which are owned except where indicated as leased:

 

 

We have a 74.5% interest in NCRA, which owns and operates the following facilities:

 

 

Ag Business

 

Within our Ag Business segment, we own or lease the following facilities:

 

Country Operations

 

In our country operations business, we own 315 agri-operations locations (of which some of the facilities are on leased land), 7 feed manufacturing facilities and 3 sunflower plants located in Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Colorado, Idaho, Washington and Oregon.

Grain Marketing

 

We use grain terminals in our grain marketing operations at the following locations:

 

Collins, Mississippi (owned)
Davenport, Iowa (2 owned)
Friona, Texas (owned)
Kalama, Washington (leased)
Minneapolis, Minnesota (owned, idle)
Myrtle Grove, Louisiana (owned)
Savage, Minnesota (owned)
Spokane, Washington (owned)
Superior, Wisconsin (owned)
Winona, Minnesota (1 owned, 1 leased)

 

Processing

 

Within our Processing segment, we own and lease the following facilities:

 

Oilseed Processing

 

We own a campus in Mankato, Minnesota, comprised of a soybean crushing plant, an oilseed refinery, a soyflour plant, a quality control laboratory and an administration office. We also own a crushing plant in Fairmont, Minnesota.

 

Wheat Milling

 

We own five milling facilities at the following locations, all of which are leased to Horizon Milling:

 

Rush City, Minnesota
Kenosha, Wisconsin
Houston, Texas
Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania
Fairmount, North Dakota

 

Corporate Headquarters

 

We are headquartered in Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota. We own a 33-acre campus consisting of one main building with approximately 320,000 square feet of office space and two smaller buildings with approximately 13,400 and 9,000 square feet of space.

 

Our internet address is www.chsinc.com.

 

We are involved as a defendant in various lawsuits, claims and disputes, which are in the normal course of our business. The resolution of any such matters may affect consolidated net income for any fiscal period; however, our management believes any resulting liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows during any fiscal year.

 

In October 2003, we and NCRA reached agreements with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State of Montana’s Department of Environmental Quality and the State of Kansas Department of Health and Environment, regarding the terms of settlements with respect to reducing air emissions at our Laurel, Montana and NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refineries. These settlements are part of a series of similar settlements that the EPA has negotiated with major refiners under the EPA’s Petroleum Refinery Initiative. The settlements, which resulted from nearly three years of discussions, take the form of consent decrees filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana (Billings Division) and the U.S. District Court for the

District of Kansas. Each consent decree details potential capital improvements, supplemental environmental projects and operational changes that we and NCRA have agreed to implement at the relevant refinery over the next several years. The consent decrees also require us and NCRA to pay approximately $0.5 million in aggregate civil cash penalties. As of August 31, 2006, the aggregate capital expenditures for us and NCRA related to these settlements was approximately $12 million, and we anticipate spending an additional $11 million over the next five years. We do not believe that the settlements will have a material adverse affect on us or NCRA.

 

None.

 

We have approximately 56,000 members, of which approximately 1,600 are cooperative association members and approximately 54,400 are individual members. As a cooperative, we do not have any common stock equity that is traded.

 

On August 31, 2006, we had 5,864,238 shares of 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock outstanding, which is listed on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol CHSCP.

 

We have not sold any equity securities during the three years ended August 31, 2006 that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

The selected financial information below has been derived from our consolidated financial statements for the years ended August 31. The selected consolidated financial information for August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this filing. In May 2005, we sold the majority of our Mexican foods business and have recorded the Mexican foods business as discontinued operations.

 

Summary Consolidated Financial Data

 

The selected financial information below has been derived from our three business segments, and Corporate and Other, for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. The intercompany sales between segments were $253.3 million, $182.4 million and $142.4 million for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

Summary Financial Data by Business Segment

 

 

 

Overview

 

The following discussions of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying audited financial statements and notes to such statements and the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements found in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements based on current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections of our management. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, as more fully described in the cautionary statement and elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

 

CHS Inc. (CHS, we or us) is a diversified company, which provides grain, foods and energy resources to businesses and consumers. As a cooperative, we are owned by farmers, ranchers and their local cooperatives from the Great Lakes to the Pacific Northwest and from the Canadian border to Texas. We also have preferred stockholders that own shares of our 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.

 

We provide a full range of production agricultural inputs such as refined fuels, propane, farm supplies, animal nutrition and agronomy products, as well as services, which include hedging, financing and insurance services. We own and operate petroleum refineries and pipelines and market and distribute refined fuels and other energy products under the Cenex^® brand through a network of member cooperatives and independent retailers. We purchase grains and oilseeds directly and indirectly from agricultural producers primarily in the Midwestern and Western United States. These grains and oilseeds are either sold to domestic and international customers, or further processed into a variety of food products.

 

We aligned our business segments based on an assessment of how our businesses operate and the products and services they sell. Our three business segments: Energy, Ag Business and Processing, create vertical integration to link producers with consumers. Our Energy segment produces and provides for the wholesale distribution of petroleum products and transports those products. Our Ag Business segment purchases and resells grains and oilseeds originated by our country operations business, by our member cooperatives and by third parties, and also serves as wholesaler and retailer of crop inputs. Our Processing segment converts grains and oilseeds into value-added products.

 

Summary data for each of our business segments for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 is provided in Item 6 “Selected Financial Data”. Except as otherwise specified, references to years indicate our fiscal year ended August 31, 2006 or ended August 31 of the year referenced.

 

Corporate administrative expenses are allocated to all three business segments, and Corporate and Other, based on either direct usage for services that can be tracked, such as information technology and legal, and other factors or considerations relevant to the costs incurred.

 

Many of our business activities are highly seasonal and operating results will vary throughout the year. Overall, our income is generally lowest during the second fiscal quarter and highest during the third fiscal quarter. Our business segments are subject to varying seasonal fluctuations. For example in our Ag Business segment, agronomy and country operations businesses experience higher volumes and income during the spring planting season and in the fall, which corresponds to harvest. Also in our Ag Business segment, our grain marketing operations is subject to fluctuations in volume and earnings based on producer harvests, world grain prices and demand. Our Energy segment generally experiences higher volumes and profitability in certain operating areas, such as refined products, in the summer and early fall when gasoline and diesel fuel usage is highest and is subject to global supply and demand forces. Other energy products, such as propane, may experience higher volumes and profitability during the winter heating and crop drying seasons.

 

Our revenue can be significantly affected by global market prices for commodities such as petroleum products, natural gas, grains, oilseeds and flour. Changes in market prices for commodities that we purchase without a corresponding change in the selling prices of those products can affect revenues and operating earnings. Commodity prices are affected by a wide range of factors beyond our control, including the weather,

crop damage due to disease or insects, drought, the availability and adequacy of supply, government regulations and policies, world events, and general political and economic conditions.

 

While our revenues and operating results are derived from businesses and operations which are wholly-owned and majority-owned, a portion of our business operations are conducted through companies in which we hold ownership interests of 50% or less and do not control the operations. We account for these investments primarily using the equity method of accounting, wherein we record our proportionate share of income or loss reported by the entity as equity income from investments, without consolidating the revenues and expenses of the entity in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. These investments principally include our 50% ownership in each of the following companies: Agriliance LLC (Agriliance), TEMCO, LLC (TEMCO) and United Harvest, LLC (United Harvest) included in our Ag Business segment; Ventura Foods, LLC (Ventura Foods), our 24% ownership in Horizon Milling, LLC (Horizon Milling), and an approximate 24% ownership in US BioEnergy Corporation (US BioEnergy) included in our Processing segment; and our 49% ownership in Cofina Financial, LLC (Cofina) included in Corporate and Other.

 

Agriliance is owned and governed by United Country Brands, LLC (50%) and Land O’Lakes, Inc. (50%). United Country Brands, LLC, was initially owned and governed 50% by us and 50% by Farmland Industries, Inc. (Farmland), and was formed solely to hold a 50% interest in Agriliance. On April 30, 2004, we purchased all of Farmland’s remaining interest in Agriliance for $27.5 million in cash. We now own 50% of the economic and governance interests in Agriliance, held through our 100% ownership interest in United Country Brands, LLC, and continue to account for this investment using the equity method of accounting.

 

In May 2005, we sold the majority of our Mexican foods business for proceeds of $38.3 million resulting in a loss on disposition of $6.2 million, with minor activity continuing in 2006. During the year ended August 31, 2006, we sold all of the remaining assets for proceeds of $4.2 million and a gain of $1.6 million. The operating results of the Mexican Foods business have been reclassified and reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CHS and all of our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, including the National Cooperative Refinery Association (NCRA), which is in our Energy segment. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

 

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year’s amounts to conform to current year classifications. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income, equities and comprehensive income, or total cash flows.

 

The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004 were restated to correct an error in the classification of our cash flows received from our interest in joint ventures and distributions made to minority owners. We determined that a portion of the cash flows from our joint ventures should have been considered a return on our investment and classified as an operating activity as distributions from equity investments, instead of as an investing activity. Additionally, we had previously reported distributions to minority owners as investing activities when they should have been classified as financing activities. The restatements did not have any impact on our Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equities and Comprehensive Income, or total change in cash and cash equivalents on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004. In addition, they did not have any impact on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 31, 2005 or 2004.

 

Recent Events

 

Subsequent to our fiscal year ended August 31, 2006, we made an additional investment of $35.0 million in US BioEnergy, bringing our current ownership of the company to approximately 25.6%, and also made investments in two new ventures. We invested approximately $30.0 million in a Brazil-based grain handling and merchandising company named Multigrain S.A., which will be owned jointly (50/50) with Multigrain Comercio, an agricultural commodities business headquartered in Sao Paulo, Brazil and will be included in our Ag Business segment. This venture which includes grain storage and export facilities, builds on our South American soybean origination and helps meet customer needs year-round. Our grain marketing operations

continue to explore other opportunities to establish a presence in other emerging grain origination and export markets. We have also invested $15.6 million in a new Horizon Milling venture (24% CHS ownership) that acquired the Canadian grain-based foodservice and industrial businesses of Smucker Foods of Canada, a wholly owned subsidiary of J.M. Smucker Company, which includes three flour milling operations and two dry baking mixing facilities in Canada.

 

Also subsequent to our fiscal year ended August 31, 2006, we sold 540,000 shares of our CF Industries Holding, Inc. (CFIH) stock for proceeds of $10.9 million, and recorded a gain of $5.3 million, reducing our ownership interest in CFIH to approximately 2.9%

 

Results of Operations

 

Comparison of the years ended August 31, 2006 and 2005

 

General.  We recorded income from continuing operations before income taxes of $539.0 million in fiscal 2006 compared to $297.3 million in fiscal 2005, an increase of $241.7 million (81%). These results reflected increased pretax earnings in our Energy and Processing segments, and Corporate and Other, partially offset by slightly decreased earnings in our Ag Business segment.

 

Our Energy segment generated income from continuing operations before income taxes of $407.6 million for the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to $185.2 million in the prior year. This increase in earnings of $222.4 million (120%) is primarily attributable to higher margins on refined fuels, which resulted mainly from limited refining capacity and increased global demand. With hurricane damage at the start of the fiscal year, the energy industry faced supply restrictions and distribution disruptions. Pipeline shutdowns later in the year also limited crude oil volumes. Earnings in our propane and transportation operations also improved compared to the previous year. These improvements were partially offset by decreased earnings in our lubricants and petroleum equipment businesses.

 

Our Ag Business segment generated income from continuing operations before income taxes of $91.7 million for the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to $92.1 million in the prior year, a decrease in earnings of $0.4 million (less than 1%). Strong domestic grain movement, much of it driven by increased US ethanol production, contributed to record performance by both country operations and grain marketing businesses. Our country operations earnings increased $14.3 million, primarily as a result of increased grain volumes and overall improved product margins, including historically high margins on grain and energy transactions. Market expansion into Oklahoma and Kansas also increased country operations volumes. Our grain marketing operations improved earnings by $11.0 million in fiscal 2006 compared with 2005, primarily from increased grain volumes and improved margins on those grains. Volatility in the grain markets creates opportunities for increased grain margins, and additionally during the current year, increased interest in renewable fuels, and higher transportation costs shifted marketing patterns and dynamics for our grain marketing business. These improvements in earnings in our country operations and grain marketing businesses were partially offset by reduced earnings generated through our wholesale and retail agronomy ownership interests, primarily Agriliance, net of allocated internal expenses, which decreased $16.1 million, primarily in reduced crop nutrient and crop protection margins. Weather-interrupted supply patterns and resulting price fluctuations dramatically reduced crop nutrient use and sales during the year. High natural gas prices, increasing international demand for nitrogen, and hurricane damage to warehouse facilities and the resulting transportation grid led to price increases early in the year. Coupled with high energy costs and low grain prices, many crop producers elected to scale back nutrient applications for the 2006 growing year. As a result, larger remaining inventories later in the year drove significant devaluation and reduced revenues.

 

Also affecting the agronomy business of our Ag Business segment, during the first quarter of fiscal 2005 we evaluated the carrying value of our investment in CF Industries, Inc. (CF), a domestic fertilizer manufacturer in which we held a minority interest. Our carrying value at that time of $153.0 million consisted primarily of non-cash patronage refunds received from CF over the years. Based upon indicative values from potential strategic buyers for the business and through other analyses, we determined at that time that the carrying value of our CF investment should be reduced by $35.0 million, resulting in an impairment charge to

our first quarter in fiscal 2005. The net effect to first fiscal quarter in 2005 income after taxes was approximately $32.1 million.

 

In February 2005, after reviewing indicative values from strategic buyers, the board of directors of CF determined that a greater value could be derived for the business through an initial public offering of stock in the company. The initial public offering was completed in August 2005. Prior to the initial public offering, we held an ownership interest of approximately 20% in CF. Through the initial public offering, we sold approximately 81% of our ownership interest for cash proceeds of approximately $140.4 million. Our book basis in the portion of our ownership interest sold through the initial public offering, after the $35.0 million impairment charge recognized in our first fiscal quarter results, was $95.8 million. As a result, we recognized a pretax gain of $44.6 million on the sale of that ownership interest during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. This gain, net of the impairment loss of $35.0 million recognized during the first quarter of fiscal 2005, resulted in a $9.6 million pretax gain recognized during fiscal 2005. The net effect to fiscal 2005 income, after taxes, was approximately $8.8 million.

 

Our Processing segment generated income from continuing operations before income taxes of $28.5 million for the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to $13.2 million in the prior year, an increase in earnings of $15.3 million (116%). Oilseed processing earnings increased $13.8 million, which was primarily the result of improved crushing margins, partially offset by slightly decreased oilseed refining margins. Contrasting the two years, the soybean harvest in the geographical area near our two crushing facilities was greatly improved in the fall of 2005 (fiscal 2006) compared with the fall of 2004 (fiscal 2005) harvest. During fiscal 2005, basis levels we paid for soybeans were higher than in most of the other soybean producing areas of the country. The improved 2005 fall harvest (fiscal 2006) normalized soybean prices in our geographical area. These lower soybean prices translated into lower raw material costs and higher volumes of soybeans crushed at our two crushing facilities. Our share of earnings from Horizon Milling, our wheat milling joint venture, increased $1.9 million for the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to the prior year. In addition, we recorded a loss of $2.4 million in fiscal 2005 on the disposition of wheat milling equipment at a closed facility. Our share of earnings from Ventura Foods, our packaged foods joint venture, decreased $2.0 million compared to the prior year. During fiscal 2006, we invested $70.0 million in US BioEnergy, an ethanol manufacturing company, in which we recorded a loss of $0.7 million, including allocated interest and internal expenses the pretax loss was $3.2 million.

 

Corporate and Other generated income from continuing operations before income taxes of $11.1 million for the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to $6.8 million in the prior year, an increase in earnings of $4.3 million (64%). The primary increase in earnings resulted from our business solutions operations which reflected improved earnings of $4.2 million, primarily as a result of improved hedging and financial services income and reduced internal expenses.

 

Net Income.  Consolidated net income for the year ended August 31, 2006 was $490.3 million compared to $250.0 million for the year ended August 31, 2005, which represents a $240.3 million (96%) increase.

 

Revenues.  Consolidated revenues of $14.4 billion for the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to $11.9 billion for the year ended August 31, 2005, which represents a $2,456.9 million (21%) increase.

 

Total revenues include other revenues generated primarily within our Ag Business segment and Corporate and Other. Our Ag Business segment’s country operations elevator and agri-service centers derives other revenues from activities related to production agriculture, which include grain storage, grain cleaning, fertilizer spreading, crop protection spraying and other services of this nature, and our grain marketing operations receives other revenues at our export terminals from activities related to loading vessels.

 

Our Energy segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $7.2 billion increased $1,548.3 million (28%) during the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to the year ended August 31, 2005. During the years ended August 31, 2006 and 2005, our Energy segment recorded revenues to our Ag Business segment of $242.4 million and $170.6 million, respectively. The revenues increase of $1,548.3 million is comprised of a net increase of $1,490.1 million related to price appreciation on refined fuels and propane products and $58.2 million related to a net increase in sales volume. Refined fuels revenues increased

$1,186.1 million (28%), of which $1,452.4 million was related to a net average selling price increase, partially offset by $266.3 million, which was related to decreased volumes, compared to the same period in the previous year. The increased revenues also included $220.6 million from ethanol marketing, which was partially offset by decreased volumes of other refined fuels and propane products. The sales price of refined fuels increased $0.53 per gallon (35%) and volumes decreased 5% when comparing the year ended August 31, 2006 with the same period a year ago. Higher crude oil prices, strong global demand and limited refining capacity contributed to the increase in refined fuels selling prices. The decrease in refined fuels volumes reflects intentional reduction of lower margin unbranded volumes. Propane revenues increased by $57.8 million (9%), of which $125.8 million was related to a net average selling price increase, partially offset by $68.0 million which was related to decreased volumes compared to the same period in the previous year. Propane prices increased $0.17 per gallon (19%) and sales volume decreased 9% in comparison to the same period of the prior year. Propane prices tend to follow the prices of crude oil and natural gas, both of which increased during the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. The decrease in propane volumes reflects a loss of exclusive propane marketing rights at our former supplier’s proprietary terminals.

 

Our Ag Business segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $6.6 billion increased $905.4 million (16%) during the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to the year ended August 31, 2005. Grain revenues in our Ag Business segment totaled $5,337.2 million and $4,613.6 million during the years ended August 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Of the grain revenues increase of $723.6 million (16%), $647.0 million is attributable to increased volumes and $76.6 million due to increased average selling grain prices during the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to the same period last fiscal year. The average sales price of all grain and oilseed commodities sold reflected an increase of $0.07 per bushel (2%). Commodity prices in general increased following a strong fall 2005 harvest that produced good yields throughout most of the United States, with the quality of most grains rated as excellent or good. The higher average market price per bushel of spring wheat and corn were approximately $0.74 and $0.15, respectively, partially offset by lower average market price per bushel of soybeans of approximately $0.15, as compared to the prices of those same grains for the year ended August 31, 2005. Volumes increased 14% during the year ended August 31, 2006 compared with the same period of a year ago. Corn, winter wheat and soybeans reflect the largest volume increases compared to the year ended August 31, 2005. While some areas of the US experienced drought conditions it appears there will be a large harvest in 2006, which is well underway in most of the geographical areas covered by our country elevator system. Our Ag Business segment non-grain revenues of $1.2 billion increased by $181.8 million (17%) during the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to the year ended August 31, 2005, primarily the result of increased revenues of energy, crop nutrient, feed and crop protection products, in addition to seed and processed sunflower revenues. The average selling price of energy products increased due to overall market conditions while volumes were fairly consistent to the year ended August 31, 2005.

 

Our Processing segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $614.1 million increased $0.8 million (less than 1%) during the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to the year ended August 31, 2005. Because our wheat milling and packaged foods operations are operated through non-consolidated joint ventures, revenues reported in our Processing segment are entirely from our oilseed processing operations. Processed soybean volumes increased 10%, accounting for an increase in revenues of $22.6 million, and were partially offset by lower average sales price of processed oilseed and other revenues which reduced revenues by $21.8 million. Oilseed refining revenues decreased $14.3 million (5%), of which $9.3 million was due to lower average sales price and $5.0 million was due to a 2% net decrease in sales volume. The average selling price of processed oilseed decreased $7 per ton and the average selling price of refined oilseed products decreased $0.01 per pound compared to the same period of the previous year. These changes in the selling price of products are primarily driven by the average price of soybeans.

 

Cost of Goods Sold.  Cost of goods sold of $13.6 billion increased $2.1 billion (19%) during the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to the year ended August 31, 2005.

 

Our Energy segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $6.6 billion increased by $1,275.1 million (24%) during the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to the same period of the prior

year, primarily due to increased average costs of refined fuels and propane products. On a more product-specific basis, the average cost of refined fuels increased by $0.49 (33%) per gallon, which included an increased cost of $220.8 million from ethanol marketing, and was partially offset by a 5% decrease in volumes compared to the year ended August 31, 2005. We process approximately 55,000 barrels of crude oil per day at our Laurel, Montana refinery and 80,000 barrels of crude oil per day at NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refinery. The average cost increase on refined fuels is reflective of higher input costs at our two crude oil refineries and higher average prices on the refined products that we purchased for resale compared to the year ended August 31, 2005. The average per unit cost of crude oil purchased for the two refineries increased 16% compared to the year ended August 31, 2005. The average cost of propane increased $0.16 (19%) per gallon, partially offset by a 9% decrease in volumes compared to the year ended August 31, 2005. The average price of propane increased due to higher procurement costs.

 

Our Ag Business segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $6.4 billion increased $861.1 million (16%) during the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to the same period of the prior year. Grain cost of goods sold in our Ag Business segment totaled $5,265.3 million and $4,550.2 million during the years ended August 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The cost of grains and oilseed procured through our Ag Business segment increased $715.1 million (16%) compared to the year ended August 31, 2005. This is primarily the result of a 14% increase in bushels along with an increase of $0.07 (2%) average cost per bushel as compared to the prior year. Corn, winter wheat and soybeans reflected the largest volume increases compared to the year ended August 31, 2005. Commodity prices on spring wheat and corn have increased, while soybeans commodity prices showed an average decrease, compared to the prices that were prevalent during the majority of fiscal 2005. Our Ag Business segment cost of goods sold, excluding the cost of grains procured through this segment, increased during the year ended August 31, 2006 compared to the year ended August 31, 2005, primarily due to energy, crop nutrient, feed and crop protection products, in addition to seed and processed sunflower products. The average cost of energy products increased due to overall market conditions while volumes stayed fairly consistent to the year ended August 31, 2005.

 

Our Processing segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $588.4 million decreased $15.3 million (3%) compared to the year ended August 31, 2005, which was primarily due to decreased input costs of soybeans processed at our two crushing plants, partially offset by higher volumes of soybeans processed at those plants.

 

Marketing, General and Administrative.  Marketing, general and administrative expenses of $231.2 million for the year ended August 31, 2006 increased by $31.9 million (16%) compared to the year ended August 31, 2005. The net increase of $31.9 million is primarily due to increased performance-based incentive plan expense, in addition to other compensation benefits, pension and general inflation.

 

Gain on Sale of Investments.  During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, we sold approximately 81% of our investment in CF Industries, Inc. through an initial public offering of our equity in that company. We received cash proceeds of $140.4 million and recorded a gain of $9.6 million, net of an impairment charge of $35.0 million recognized during the first quarter of fiscal 2005. This gain is reflected within the results reported for our Ag Business segment.

 

During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we sold stock representing a portion of our investment in a publicly-traded company for cash proceeds of $7.4 million and recorded a gain of $3.4 million.

 

Interest, net.  Interest, net of $41.3 million for the year ended August 31, 2006 decreased $0.2 million (less than 1%) compared to the year ended August 31, 2005. Interest expense for the years ended August 31, 2006 and 2005 was $50.6 million and $51.5 million, respectively. Interest income, primarily from marketable securities, for the years ended August 31, 2006 and 2005 was $9.3 million and $10.0 million, respectively. The interest expense decrease of $0.9 million (2%), includes a decrease of short-term borrowings primarily related to reduced working capital, partially offset by an increase in the average short-term interest rate and a reduction in capitalized interest. For the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006 and 2005, we capitalized interest of $4.7 million and $6.8 million, respectively, related to capitalized construction projects. The reduction in capitalized interest relates to the interest on financing the final stages of the ultra-low sulfur upgrades at our energy refineries. The average level of short-term borrowings decreased $143.4 million during fiscal 2006

compared to the year ended August 31, 2005, while the average short-term interest rate increased 1.50%. The interest income decrease of $0.7 million (8%) was primarily in our Energy segment related to a decrease in interest income from short term investments, primarily at NCRA.

 

Equity Income from Investments.  Equity income from investments of $84.2 million for the year ended August 31, 2006 decreased $11.6 million (12%) compared to the year ended August 31, 2005. We record equity income or loss from the investments in which we have an ownership interest of 50% or less and have significant influence, but not control, for our proportionate share of income or loss reported by the entity, without consolidating the revenues and expenses of the entity in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The net decrease in equity income from investments was attributable to reduced earnings from investments within our Ag Business and Processing segments of $14.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively and was partially offset by improved earnings within our Energy segment and Corporate and Other of $0.4 million and $3.3 million, respectively.

 

Our Ag Business segment generated reduced earnings of $14.6 million from equity investments. Our investments in a Canadian joint venture contributed reduced earnings of $1.5 million. Our share of equity investment earnings in Agriliance decreased $12.4 million and primarily relates to reduced crop nutrient and crop protection margins. Weather-interrupted supply patterns and resulting wide price fluctuations dramatically reduced crop nutrient use and sales during the year. High natural gas prices, increasing international demand for nitrogen, and hurricane damage to warehouse facilities and the related transportation grid led to price increases early in the year. Coupled with high energy costs and low grain prices, many crop producers elected to scale back nutrient applications for the 2006 growing year. As a result, larger remaining inventories later in the year drove significant devaluation and reduced revenues. Our equity income from our investment in TEMCO, a joint venture, which exports primarily corn and soybeans, recorded reduced earnings primarily on logistics of $4.2 million, while our wheat exporting investment in United Harvest contributed improved earnings of $2.4 million. Our country operations reported increases in equity investments of $1.1 million.

 

Our Processing segment generated reduced earnings of $0.7 million from equity investments. Ventura Foods, our vegetable oil-based products and packaged foods joint venture, recorded reduced earnings of $2.0 million, partially offset by Horizon Milling, our wheat milling joint venture, which recorded improved earnings of $1.9 million compared to the same period in the previous year. During 2006, we invested $70.0 million in US BioEnergy Corporation (US BioEnergy), an ethanol manufacturing company, representing an approximate 24% ownership and recorded losses of $0.7 million. A shifting demand balance for soybeans for both food and renewable fuels meant addressing supply and price challenges for both CHS and our joint venture with Ventura Foods. Ventura Foods also completed integration of its dressing and dips acquisition, and exited a large part of its nutritional products business, all of which resulted in increased general expenses. Horizon Milling’s results are primarily affected by US dietary habits. Although the preference for a low carbohydrate diet appears to have reached the bottom of its cycle, milling capacity, which had been idled over the past few years because of lack of demand for flour products, can easily be put back in production as consumption of flour products increases, which will continue to depress gross margins in the milling industry.

 

Our Energy segment generated improved earnings of $0.4 million related to improved margins in an NCRA equity investment, and Corporate and Other generated improved earnings of $3.3 million from equity investments, primarily from Cofina, our financial services equity investment, as compared to the year ended August 31, 2005.

 

Minority Interests.  Minority interests of $86.0 million for the year ended August 31, 2006 increased by $38.2 million (80%) compared to the year ended August 31, 2005. This net increase was a result of more profitable operations within our majority-owned subsidiaries compared to the prior year. Substantially all minority interests relate to NCRA, an approximately 74.5% owned subsidiary, which we consolidate in our Energy segment.

 

Income Taxes.  Income tax expense, excluding discontinued operations, of $49.3 million for the year ended August 31, 2006 compares with $30.4 million for the year ended August 31, 2005, resulting in effective tax rates of 9.2% and 10.2%, respectively. The federal and state statutory rate applied to nonpatronage business

activity was 38.9% for the years ended August 31, 2006 and 2005. The income taxes and effective tax rate vary each year based upon profitability and nonpatronage business activity during each of the comparable years.

 

Discontinued Operations.  During the year ended August, 31, 2005, we reclassified our Mexican foods operations, previously reported in Corporate and Other, along with gains and losses recognized on sales of assets, and impairments on assets for sale, as discontinued operations that were sold or have met required criteria for such classification. In our Consolidated Statements of Operations, all of our Mexican foods operations have been accounted for as discontinued operations. The amounts recorded for the years ended August 31, 2006 and 2005 were $1.0 million income ($0.6 million in income, net of taxes), primarily the result of the sale of remaining assets, and $27.5 million loss ($16.8 million loss, net of taxes), respectively.

 

Comparison of the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004

 

General.  We recorded income from continuing operations before income taxes of $297.3 million in fiscal 2005 compared to $256.7 million in fiscal 2004, an increase of $40.6 million (16%). These results reflected increased pretax earnings in our Ag Business and Energy segments, partially offset by decreased earnings in our Processing segment, and Corporate and Other.

 

Our Energy segment generated income from continuing operations before income taxes of $185.2 million for the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to $156.4 million in the prior year. This increase in earnings of $28.8 million (18%) was primarily attributable to higher margins on refined fuels, which resulted mainly from limited refining capacity and increased global demand. Earnings in our lubricants operations also improved compared to the previous year. These improvements were partially offset by decreased earnings in our propane and transportation businesses.

 

Our Ag Business segment generated income from continuing operations before income taxes of $92.1 million for the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to $63.2 million in the prior year, an increase in earnings of $28.9 million (46%). All three operations that comprise this business segment generated improved earnings in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004 results. Our grain marketing operations improved earnings by $5.8 million in fiscal 2005 compared with fiscal 2004, of which $11.3 million of the increase is attributable to a situation in fiscal 2004 involving export contracts to China. During fiscal 2004, we, along with several other international grain marketing companies, experienced contract issues with Chinese customers for soybeans. Because the market value of soybeans had declined between the date of the contracts and the delivery date, certain Chinese customers indicated their intent of nonperformance on these contracts. At that time, based upon our assessment of the impact of default, we valued those contracts at $18.5 million less than current market value, which was recorded as an addition to cost of goods sold in 2004. Our country operations earnings increased $2.1 million, primarily as a result of improved margins. Strong export demand to Asia favored shuttle train movement to the west coast, and many of our country elevators were positioned to take advantage of that market. Our share of agronomy earnings generated through our ownership interests, primarily Agriliance, net of certain allocated internal expenses, increased $11.3 million. Strong grain prices during 2004 encouraged producers to increase planted acres and to purchase agronomy products to optimize yields in 2005.

 

Also affecting the agronomy business of our Ag Business segment, during the first quarter of fiscal 2005, we evaluated the carrying value of our investment in CF Industries, Inc. (CF), a domestic fertilizer manufacturer in which we held a minority interest. Our carrying value at that time of $153.0 million consisted primarily of non-cash patronage refunds received from CF over the years. Based upon indicative values from potential strategic buyers for the business and through other analyses, we determined at that time that the carrying value of our CF investment should be reduced by $35.0 million, resulting in an impairment charge to our first quarter in fiscal 2005. The net effect to first fiscal quarter in 2005 income after taxes was approximately $32.1 million.

 

In February 2005, after reviewing indicative values from strategic buyers, the board of directors of CF determined that a greater value could be derived for the business through an initial public offering of stock in the company. The initial public offering was completed in August 2005. Prior to the initial public offering, we held an ownership interest of approximately 20% in CF. Through the initial public offering, we sold

approximately 81% of our ownership interest for cash proceeds of approximately $140.4 million. Our book basis in the portion of our ownership interest sold through the initial public offering, after the $35.0 million impairment charge recognized in our first fiscal quarter results, was $95.8 million. As a result, we recognized a pretax gain of $44.6 million on the sale of that ownership interest during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. This gain, net of the impairment loss of $35.0 million recognized during the first quarter of fiscal 2005, resulted in a $9.6 million pretax gain recognized during fiscal 2005. The net effect to fiscal 2005 income, after taxes, was approximately $8.8 million.

 

Our Processing segment generated income from continuing operations before income taxes of $13.2 million for the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to $29.1 million in the prior year, a decrease in earnings of $15.9 million (55%). Oilseed processing earnings decreased $21.7 million, which was primarily the result of lower crushing margins, partially offset by improved oilseed refining margins. The lower crushing margins were due to higher raw material costs and crushing over-capacity in the geographical area around our plants. Higher demand for soybeans in foreign markets had increased the cost of soybeans used in our crushing operations, and lower-cost soybeans from areas less affected by export demand allowed soybean meal to be shipped into our trade area at costs competitive with our own. This basis difference in the price of soybeans in our geographical area compared to other areas of the country also impaired our ability to ship soybean meal to more distant markets with less local crushing capacity, which resulted in poor margins on soybean meal. Refined soybean oil, which has more of a national market, enjoyed improved margins over those generated in the prior fiscal year. Our share of earnings from Horizon Milling, our wheat milling joint venture, decreased $2.4 million for the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to the prior year. In addition, we recorded a loss of $2.4 million in fiscal 2005 on the disposition of wheat milling equipment at a closed facility. Partially offsetting these decreases in earnings was our share of earnings from Ventura Foods, our packaged foods joint venture, which increased $8.5 million compared to the prior year. Ventura Foods experienced rapidly increasing soybean oil costs in fiscal 2004 which could not be passed on to customers as quickly as the additional costs were incurred. During fiscal 2005, soybean oil costs were less volatile which allowed Ventura Foods to adjust sales prices and even increase market share for several categories of products.

 

Corporate and Other generated income from continuing operations before income taxes of $6.8 million for the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to $8.0 million in the prior year, a decrease in earnings of $1.2 million (15%). The primary decrease in earnings was in our business solutions operations which reflected decreased earnings of $1.1 million, primarily as a result of reduced hedging and insurance income. Less volatility in grain prices affected hedging commissions and lower insurance premiums, upon which we are paid a commission, reduced insurance income.

 

Net Income.  Consolidated net income for the year ended August 31, 2005 was $250.0 million compared to $221.3 million for the year ended August 31, 2004, which represents a $28.7 million (13%) increase.

 

Revenues.  Consolidated revenues of $11.9 billion for the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to $11.0 billion for the year ended August 31, 2004, which represents a $957.9 million (9%) increase.

 

Total revenues include other revenues generated primarily within our Ag Business segment and Corporate and Other. Our Ag Business segment’s country operations elevator and agri-service centers derives other revenues from activities related to production agriculture, which include grain storage, grain cleaning, fertilizer spreading, crop protection spraying and other services of this nature, and our grain marketing operations receives other revenues at our export terminals from activities related to loading vessels.

 

Our Energy segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $5.6 billion increased $1,706.3 million (44%) during the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to the year ended August 31, 2004. During the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004, our Energy segment recorded revenues to our Ag Business segment of $170.6 million and $121.2 million, respectively. The revenues increase of $1,706.3 million was comprised of a net increase of $1,549.8 million related to price appreciation on refined fuels and propane products and $156.5 million related to a net increase in sales volume. Refined fuels revenues increased $1,360.6 million (48%), of which $1,112.5 million was related to a net average selling price increase and $248.1 million was related to increased volumes. The sales price of refined fuels increased $0.43 per gallon (39%) and volumes increased 6% when comparing the year ended August 31, 2005 with the same period in

the prior year. Higher crude oil costs, strong global demand and limited refining capacity contributed to the increase in refined fuels selling prices. Propane revenues increased by $154.7 million (30%), of which $140.3 million was related to a net average selling price increase and $14.4 million was due to increased volumes compared to the same period in the previous year. Propane prices increased $0.19 per gallon (28%) and sales volume increased 2% in comparison to the same period of the prior year. Propane prices tend to follow the prices of crude oil and natural gas, both of which increased during the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004.

 

Our Ag Business segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $5.7 billion decreased $627.2 million (10%) during the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to the year ended August 31, 2004. Grain revenues in our Ag Business segment totaled $4,613.6 million and $5,346.9 million during the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The grain revenues decrease of $733.3 million (14%) was attributable to decreased average selling grain prices of $446.0 million, and $287.3 million was related to decreased volumes during the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to the same period the prior fiscal year. The average sales price of all grain and oilseed commodities sold reflected a decrease of $0.38 per bushel (8%). Commodity prices in general decreased following a strong fall 2004 harvest that produced good yields throughout most of the United States, with the quality of most grains rated as excellent or good. The large harvest assured domestic end users of grain that there would likely be adequate supply throughout the year, which had the effect of reducing nearby purchases and hence, our sales volume. The average market price per bushel of soybeans, spring wheat and corn were approximately $1.84, $0.50 and $0.70, respectively, less than the prices on those same grains as compared to the year ended August 31, 2004. Volumes decreased 6% during the year ended August 31, 2005 compared with the same period in 2004. Corn and winter wheat reflected the largest volume decreases compared to the year ended August 31, 2004. Our Ag Business segment non-grain revenues of $1.0 billion increased by $106.1 million (11%) during the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to the year ended August 31, 2004, primarily the result of increased revenues of energy and crop nutrient products, partially offset by decreased feed and processed sunflower sales. The average selling price of energy products increased due to overall market conditions while volumes were fairly consistent to the year ended August 31, 2004.

 

Our Processing segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $613.3 million decreased $120.3 million (16%) during the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to the year ended August 31, 2004. Because our wheat milling and packaged foods operations are operated through non-consolidated joint ventures, revenues reported in our Processing segment are entirely from our oilseed processing operations. A lower average sales price reduced processed oilseed sales dollars by $118.9 million, and an 11% increase in volumes partially offset that variance by $29.3 million. Oilseed refining revenues decreased $42.9 million (12%), of which $37.6 million was due to lower average sales price and $5.3 million was due to a 2% net decrease in sales volume. The average selling price of processed oilseed decreased $68 per ton and the average selling price of refined oilseed products decreased $0.03 per pound compared to the same period of the previous year. These changes in the selling price of products are primarily driven by the price of soybeans. In 2004, the US experienced a short soybean crop and strong export demand. That combination drove soybean prices to near record high levels. Soybean prices throughout most of fiscal 2005 were at more normal levels.

 

Cost of Goods Sold.  Cost of goods sold of $11.4 billion increased $922.1 million (9%) during the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to the year ended August 31, 2004.

 

Our Energy segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $5.3 billion increased by $1,657.6 million (45%) during the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to the same period of the prior year, primarily due to increased average costs of refined fuels and propane products. On a more product-specific basis, the average cost of refined fuels increased by $0.43 (40%) per gallon and volumes increased 6% compared to the year ended August 31, 2004. We process approximately 55,000 barrels of crude oil per day at our Laurel, Montana refinery and 80,000 barrels of crude oil per day at NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refinery. The average cost increase on refined fuels is reflective of higher input costs at our two crude oil refineries and higher average prices on the refined products that we purchased for resale compared to the year ended August 31, 2004. The average per unit cost of crude oil purchased for the two refineries increased 42% compared to the year ended August 31, 2004. The average cost of propane increased $0.20 (29%) per gallon

and volumes increased by 2% compared to the year ended August 31, 2004. The average price of propane increased due to higher procurement costs.

 

Our Ag Business segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $5.5 billion decreased $637.1 million (10%) during the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to the same period of the prior year. Grain cost of goods sold in our Ag Business segment totaled $4,550.2 million and $5,279.4 million during the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The cost of grains and oilseed procured through our Ag Business segment decreased $729.2 million (14%) compared to the year ended August 31, 2004, primarily the result of a $0.37 (8%) average cost per bushel decrease and a 6% decrease in volumes as compared to the prior year. Corn and winter wheat reflected the largest volume decreases compared to the year ended August 31, 2004. Commodity prices on soybeans, spring wheat and corn have decreased compared to the high prices that were prevalent during the majority of fiscal 2004. Our Ag Business segment cost of goods sold, excluding the cost of grains procured through this segment, increased during the year ended August 31, 2005 compared to the year ended August 31, 2004, primarily due to energy and crop nutrient products, partially offset by decreased cost of feed and processed sunflower products. The average cost of energy products increased due to overall market condition while volumes stayed fairly consistent to the year ended August 31, 2004.

 

Our Processing segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $603.7 million decreased $98.1 million (14%) compared to the year ended August 31, 2004, which was primarily due to decreased input costs of soybeans processed at our two crushing plants.

 

Marketing, General and Administrative.  Marketing, general and administrative expenses of $199.4 million for the year ended August 31, 2005 decreased by $3.1 million (2%) compared to the year ended August 31, 2004. The decrease primarily related to reduced bad debt and technology expenses as compared to the prior year, mostly in our Energy segment.

 

Gain on Sale of Investments.  During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, we sold approximately 81% of our investment in CF Industries, Inc. through an initial public offering of our equity in that company. We received cash proceeds of $140.4 million and recorded a gain of $9.6 million, net of an impairment charge of $35.0 million recognized during the first quarter of fiscal 2005. This gain is reflected within the results reported for our Ag Business segment.

 

During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we sold stock representing a portion of our investment in a publicly-traded company for cash proceeds of $7.4 million and recorded a gain of $3.4 million.

 

During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we recorded a gain of $14.7 million within our Energy segment for the sale of a portion of a petroleum crude oil pipeline held by our 74.5% owned subsidiary, NCRA. NCRA exercised its right of first refusal to purchase a partial interest in this pipeline, and subsequently sold a 50% interest to another third party for cash proceeds of $25.0 million.

 

Gain on Legal Settlements.  Our Ag Business segment received cash of $0.7 million during the year ended August 31, 2004 from the settlement of a class action lawsuit alleging illegal price fixing against various feed vitamin product suppliers.

 

Interest, net.  Interest, net of $41.5 million for the year ended August 31, 2005 decreased $1.2 million (3%) compared to the year ended August 31, 2004. Interest expense for the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004 was $51.5 million and $48.7 million, respectively. Interest income, primarily from marketable securities, for the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004 was $10.0 million and $6.0 million, respectively. The interest expense increase of $2.8 million (6%) was primarily related to an increase in long-term borrowings, partially offset by a decrease in short-term borrowings and an increase in capitalized interest. In September 2004, we increased our long-term debt by entering into a private placement with several insurance companies in the amount of $125.0 million, for the purpose of financing the final stages of our ultra-low sulfur upgrades at our energy refineries. For the fiscal years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004, we capitalized interest of $6.8 million and $2.8 million, respectively, related to capitalized construction projects. The increase in capitalized interest relates to the interest on financing the developing stages of the ultra-low sulfur upgrades at our energy refineries. The average level of short-term borrowings decreased $211.7 million during fiscal 2005 compared

to the year ended August 31, 2004, while the average short-term interest rate increased 1.50%. The interest income increase of $4.0 million (68%) was primarily in our Energy segment related to an increase in interest income from short term investments, primarily NCRA.

 

Equity Income from Investments.  Equity income from investments of $95.7 million for the year ended August 31, 2005 favorably changed by $16.7 million (21%) compared to the year ended August 31, 2004. We record equity income or loss from the investments in which we have an ownership interest of 50% or less and have significant influence, but not control, for our proportionate share of income or loss reported by the entity, without consolidating the revenues and expenses of the entity in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The net increase in equity income from investments was attributable to improved earnings from investments within our Ag Business, Processing and Energy segments and Corporate and Other of $8.0 million, $6.2 million, $2.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

 

Our Ag Business segment generated improved earnings of $8.0 million from equity investments. Our investments in a Canadian joint venture contributed improved earnings primarily from their joint ventures of $2.9 million. Our share of equity investment in Agriliance increased $3.8 million and primarily related to improved margins in crop protection products, partially offset by reduced margins in retail operations. Our equity income from our investment in TEMCO, a joint venture, which exports primarily corn and soybeans contributed improved earnings of $0.3 million, and our wheat exporting investment in United Harvest contributed improved earnings of $0.3 million. Our country operations also had increases in equity investments of $0.6 million.

 

Our Processing segment generated improved earnings of $6.2 million from equity investments. Ventura Foods, our vegetable oil-based products and packaged foods joint venture, recorded increased earnings of $8.5 million, partially offset by Horizon Milling, our wheat milling joint venture, which recorded decreased earnings of $2.4 million compared to the same period in the previous year. During fiscal 2004, Ventura Foods faced rapidly increasing costs for soybean oil which it was unable to pass through in the form of price increases to customers. During 2005, soybean prices were far less volatile so a more normal gross margin was maintained. Horizon Milling’s results are primarily affected by US dietary habits. Although the preference for a low carbohydrate diet appears to have reached the bottom of its cycle, milling capacity which had been idled over the past few years because of lack of demand for flour products can easily be put back in production as consumption of flour products increases, which will continue to depress gross margins in the milling industry.

 

Our Energy segment generated improved earnings of $2.1 million related to improved margins in an NCRA equity investment, and Corporate and Other generated improved earnings of $0.4 million from equity investments as compared to the year ended August 31, 2004.

 

Minority Interests.  Minority interests of $47.7 million for the year ended August 31, 2005 increased by $13.9 million (41%) compared to the year ended August 31, 2004. This net increase was a result of more profitable operations within our majority-owned subsidiaries compared to the prior year. Substantially all minority interests relate to NCRA, an approximately 74.5% owned subsidiary, which we consolidate in our Energy segment.

 

Income Taxes.  Income tax expense, excluding discontinued operations, of $30.4 million for the year ended August 31, 2005 compares with $29.5 million for the year ended August 31, 2004, resulting in effective tax rates of 10.2% and 11.5%, respectively. The federal and state statutory rate applied to nonpatronage business activity was 38.9% for the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004. The income taxes and effective tax rate vary each year based upon profitability and nonpatronage business activity during each of the comparable years.

 

Discontinued Operations.  During the year ended August, 31, 2005, we reclassified our Mexican foods operations, previously reported in Corporate and Other, along with gains and losses recognized on sales of assets, and impairments on assets for sale, as discontinued operations that were sold or have met required criteria for such classification. In our Consolidated Statements of Operations, all of our Mexican foods operations have been accounted for as discontinued operations. Accordingly, operating results had been reclassified to report those operations as discontinued. The loss amounts recorded for the years ended

August 31, 2005 and 2004 were $27.5 million ($16.8 million, net of taxes) and $9.7 million ($5.9 million, net of taxes), respectively.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

On August 31, 2006, we had working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, of $829.0 million and a current ratio, defined as current assets divided by current liabilities of 1.5 to 1.0, compared to working capital of $758.7 million and a current ratio of 1.4 to 1.0 on August 31, 2005. Working capital increased during fiscal 2006 by $70.3 million when compared to 2005, despite capital expenditures of $235.0 million, primarily because of strong earnings. We anticipate that working capital will be drawn down to a level that is more consistent with historical levels through capital expenditures related to the coker unit project at our Laurel, Montana refinery, as described below in “Cash Flows from Investing Activities”.

 

During May 2006, we renewed and expanded our committed lines of revolving credit pursuant to a 2006 Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement. The previously established credit lines consisted of a $700 million 364-day revolver and a $300 million five-year revolver. The current committed credit facility consists of a five-year revolver in the amount of $1.1 billion, with a $200 million potential addition for future expansion. The other terms of the current credit facility are the same as the terms of the credit facilities that it replaced in all material respects. These credit facilities are established with a syndicate of domestic and international banks, and the inventories and receivables financed with these loans are highly liquid. On August 31, 2006, we had no amounts outstanding on these lines of credit compared with $60.0 million on August 31, 2005. Late summer and early fall are typically our lowest points of seasonal borrowings. In September 2004, we borrowed $125.0 million from a group of insurance companies on a long-term basis and used the proceeds to pay down the revolving lines of credit. We believe that we have adequate liquidity to cover any increase in net operating assets and liabilities in the foreseeable future.

 

As noted in the —“Overview” at the beginning of Item 7, certain cash flow items have been restated to classify them differently.

 

Cash Flows from Operations

 

Cash flows from operations are generally affected by commodity prices and the seasonality of our businesses. These commodity prices are affected by a wide range of factors beyond our control, including weather, crop conditions, drought, the availability and the adequacy of supply and transportation, government regulations and policies, world events, and general political and economic conditions. These factors are described in the cautionary statement in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K, and may affect net operating assets and liabilities, and liquidity.

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities were $454.9 million, $276.5 million and $394.3 million for the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Volatility in cash flows from operations between fiscal 2006 and 2005 is primarily the result of greater net income during fiscal 2006. Volatility in cash flows from operations between fiscal 2005 and 2004 is primarily the result of an increase in net operating assets and liabilities as a result of increased crude and refined oil prices and an increase in grain and oilseed inventory quantities.

 

Our operating activities provided net cash of $454.9 million during the year ended August 31, 2006. Net income of $490.3 million and net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments of $255.3 million were partially offset by an increase in net operating assets and liabilities of $290.7 million. The primary components of net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments included depreciation and amortization of $126.8 million, minority interests of $86.0 million and deferred tax expense of $78.3 million, which were partially offset by income from equity investments net of distributions of $25.9 million. The increase in net operating assets and liabilities was caused primarily by an increase in inventories and a decrease in payables on August 31, 2006 when compared to August 31, 2005. The increase in inventories was primarily due to an increase in grain prices and grain inventory quantities in our Ag Business segment. On August 31, 2006, the market prices of two of our primary grain commodities, spring wheat and corn, increased by $1.04 per bushel (29%) and $0.31 per bushel (15%), respectively, and soybeans,

another high volume commodity, saw a decline in price of $0.45 per bushel (8%) when compared to August 31, 2005. Grain inventories in our Ag Business segment increased by 16.3 million bushels (18%) when comparing inventories at August 31, 2006 and 2005. In addition, energy inventories at NCRA increased by 763 thousand barrels (26%) on August 31, 2006 when compared to August 31, 2005, and were also valued using prices that were 46% higher than the previous year. The decrease in accounts payable is related to NCRA, and is primarily due to a decrease in payables for crude oil purchased. The decrease in crude oil payables was related to the planned major maintenance turnaround, during which time the refinery was shut down and inventory was not used for production. The turnaround was completed by the end of August 2006.

 

Our operating activities provided net cash of $276.5 million during the year ended August 31, 2005. Net income of $250.0 million and net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments of $137.3 million were partially offset by an increase in net operating assets and liabilities of $110.8 million. The primary components of net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments included depreciation and amortization of $110.3 million, minority interests of $47.7 million and deferred tax expense of $26.4 million, which were partially offset by income from equity investments net of distributions of $30.9 million, and a pretax gain on the sale of investments of $13.0 million. The increase in net operating assets and liabilities was caused primarily by an increase in crude oil prices of $26.82 per barrel (64%) on August 31, 2005 when compared to August 31, 2004, and an increase in grain and oilseed inventories in our Ag Business segment of 36.1 million bushels (64%) when comparing those same fiscal year-end dates.

 

Our operating activities provided net cash of $394.3 million during the year ended August 31, 2004. Net income of $221.3 million, net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments of $112.7 million, and a decrease in net operating assets and liabilities of $60.3 million provided this net cash from operating activities. The primary components of net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments included depreciation and amortization of $108.4 million and minority interests of $33.8 million, which were partially offset by income from equity investments net of distributions of $20.3 million and a pretax gain on the sale of an investment of $14.7 million. The decrease in net operating assets and liabilities was caused primarily by a decrease in grain and oilseed inventories of 20.4 million bushels (26%) in our Ag Business segment.

 

Crude oil prices are expected to be volatile in the foreseeable future, but related inventories and receivables are turned in a relatively short period, thus somewhat mitigating the effect on operating assets and liabilities. Grain prices are influenced significantly by global projections of grain stocks available until the next harvest. We anticipate that demand for corn for ethanol production will likely create relatively high prices and price volatility for that commodity in fiscal 2007. With higher corn prices, we also anticipate an increase in corn acres planted in 2007, with some of those acres displacing acres previously planted for soybeans and wheat. That trend is also likely to increase the prices for those commodities as supply is decreased.

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

For the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the net cash flows used in our investing activities totaled $265.3 million, $91.9 million and $224.1 million, respectively.

 

The acquisition of property, plant and equipment comprised the primary use of cash totaling $235.0 million, $257.5 million and $245.1 million for the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Capital expenditures primarily related to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) low sulfur fuel regulations required by 2006 are complete at our Laurel, Montana refinery and NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refinery. We incurred capital expenditures from fiscal year 2003 through 2006 related to these projects of $88.1 million for our Laurel, Montana refinery and $328.7 million for NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refinery. Expenditures for the projects at the two refineries in total during the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, were $71.5 million, $165.1 million and $135.0 million, respectively.

 

For the year ending August 31, 2007, we expect to spend approximately $391.0 million for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment. Included in our projected capital spending through fiscal year 2008 is the installation of a coker unit at our Laurel, Montana refinery, along with other refinery improvements, which will allow us to extract a greater volume of high value gasoline and diesel fuel from a barrel of crude oil and

less relatively low value asphalt, that is expected to increase yields by 14 percent. The total cost for this project is expected to be approximately $325.0 million, with completion planned during fiscal 2008. We anticipate funding the project with cash flows from operations. Total expenditures for this project as of August 31, 2006, were $62.8 million, all of which were incurred during the year then ended.

 

In October 2003, we and NCRA reached agreements with the EPA and the State of Montana’s Department of Environmental Quality and the State of Kansas Department of Health and Environment regarding the terms of settlements with respect to reducing air emissions at our Laurel, Montana and NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refineries. These settlements are part of a series of similar settlements that the EPA has negotiated with major refiners under the EPA’s Petroleum Refinery Initiative. The settlements, which resulted from nearly three years of discussions, take the form of consent decrees filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana (Billings Division) and the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. Each consent decree details potential capital improvements, supplemental environmental projects and operational changes that we and NCRA have agreed to implement at the relevant refinery over the next several years. The consent decrees also require us, and NCRA, to pay approximately $0.5 million in aggregate civil cash penalties. As of August 31, 2006, the aggregate capital expenditures for us and NCRA related to these settlements was approximately $12 million, and we anticipate spending an additional $11 million over the next five years. We do not believe that the settlements will have a material adverse effect on us, or NCRA.

 

Investments made during the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 totaled $73.0 million, $25.9 million and $49.8 million, respectively. During the year ended August 31, 2006, we made investments of $70.0 million in US BioEnergy for shares of Class A Common Stock. In August 2006, US BioEnergy filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register shares of common stock for sale in an initial public offering, but it has not yet become effective. During the year ended August 31, 2005, we contributed $19.6 million in cash (plus an additional $18.5 million in net assets, primarily loans) to Cofina for a 49% equity interest. Cofina was formed by us and Cenex Finance Association to provide financing for agricultural cooperatives and businesses, and to producers of agricultural products. During the year ended August 31, 2004 we purchased all of Farmland’s interest in Agriliance for a cash payment of $27.5 million, as previously discussed. Also during the year ended August 31, 2004, NCRA exercised its right of first refusal to purchase a partial interest in a crude oil pipeline for $16.0 million.

 

Subsequent to our fiscal year ended August 31, 2006, we made an additional investment of $35.0 million in US BioEnergy, bringing our current ownership of the company to approximately 25.6%, and also made investments in two other ventures. We invested approximately $30.0 million in a Brazil-based grain handling and merchandising company named Multigrain S.A., which will be owned jointly (50/50) with Multigrain Comercio, an agricultural commodities business headquartered in Sao Paulo, Brazil and will be included in our Ag Business segment. This venture which includes grain storage and export facilities, builds on our South American soybean origination and helps meet customer needs year-round. Our grain marketing operations continue to explore other opportunities to establish a presence in other emerging grain origination and export markets. We have also invested $15.6 million in a new Horizon Milling venture (24% CHS ownership) that acquired the Canadian grain-based foodservice and industrial businesses of Smucker Foods of Canada, a wholly owned subsidiary of J.M. Smucker Company, which includes three flour milling operations and two dry baking mixing facilities in Canada.

 

During the year ended August 31, 2006, changes in notes receivable resulted in an increase in cash flows of $21.0 million, and during the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004, resulted in decreases in cash flows of $23.8 million and $6.9 million, respectively, primarily from related party notes receivables at NCRA from its minority owners, Growmark, Inc. and MFA Oil Company.

 

Partially offsetting our cash outlays for investing activities were proceeds from the disposition of property, plant and equipment of $13.9 million, $21.1 million and $34.5 million for the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and during the year ended August 31, 2005, we sold the majority of our Mexican foods business for proceeds of $38.3 million. The proceeds from the sale of our Mexican foods business includes $13.8 million received for equipment that was used to buy out operating leases during the same period. During the year ended August 31, 2004, proceeds of $19.8 million were from a sale-leaseback

transaction for equipment at our oilseed processing facility in Fairmont, Minnesota. Also partially offsetting cash usages were investments redeemed totaling $7.3 million, $13.5 million and $15.9 million for the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. During the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004, we also received proceeds of $147.8 million and $25.0 million, respectively, from the sale of investments. During the year ended August 31, 2005, we received proceeds of $140.4 million from the sale of our CF Industries, Inc. investment ($9.6 million pretax gain) in our Ag Business segment, and proceeds of $7.4 million ($3.4 million pretax gain) from another investment. During the year ended August 31, 2004, NCRA exercised its right of first refusal to purchase a partial interest in a crude oil pipeline as previously discussed, and subsequently sold a 50% interest in the same pipeline to another third party for proceeds of $25.0 million, and recorded a pretax gain on the sale of $14.7 million.

 

Subsequent to our fiscal year ended August 31, 2006, we sold 540,000 shares of our CF Industries Holding, Inc. (CFIH) stock for proceeds of $10.9 million, and recorded a gain of $5.3 million, reducing our ownership interest in CFIH to approximately 2.9%

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

We finance our working capital needs through short-term lines of credit with a syndication of domestic and international banks. In May 2006, we renewed and expanded our committed lines of revolving credit. The previously established credit lines consisted of a $700.0 million 364-day revolver and a $300.0 million five-year revolver. The new committed credit facility consists of a five-year revolver in the amount of $1.1 billion, with a $200 million potential addition for future expansion. The other terms of the current credit facility are the same as the terms of the credit facilities it replaced in all material respects. In addition to these lines of credit, we have a two-year revolving credit facility dedicated to NCRA, with a syndication of banks in the amount of $15.0 million committed. In December 2005, the line of credit dedicated to NCRA was renewed for one year with no material changes to the terms of the credit facility. We also have a committed revolving line of credit dedicated to Provista Renewable Fuels Marketing, LLC (Provista), through LaSalle Bank National Association which expires in November 2007, in the amount of $20.0 million, with $12.5 million outstanding on August 31, 2006. On August 31, 2006 and 2005, we had total short-term indebtedness outstanding on these various facilities and other miscellaneous short-term notes payable totaling $22.0 million and $61.1 million, respectively. On August 31, 2006, interest rates for amounts outstanding on the Provista credit facility and other miscellaneous short-term notes payable ranged from 7.25% to 8.80%. In September 2004, we received $125.0 million from private placement proceeds that were used to pay down our 364-day credit facilities.

 

We finance our long-term capital needs, primarily for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment, with long-term agreements with various insurance companies and banks. In June 1998, we established a long-term credit agreement through the cooperative banks. This facility committed $200.0 million of long-term borrowing capacity to us, with repayments through fiscal year 2009. The amount outstanding on this credit facility was $98.4 million and $114.8 million on August 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Interest rates on August 31, 2006 ranged from 6.30% to 7.13%. Repayments of $16.4 million, $16.4 million and $6.6 million were made on this facility during the three years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

Also in June 1998, we completed a private placement offering with several insurance companies for long-term debt in the amount of $225.0 million with an interest rate of 6.81%. Repayments are due in equal annual installments of $37.5 million each in the years 2008 through 2013.

 

In January 2001, we entered into a note purchase and private shelf agreement with Prudential Insurance Company. The long-term note in the amount of $25.0 million has an interest rate of 7.9% and is due in equal annual installments of approximately $3.6 million, in the years 2005 through 2011. A subsequent note for $55.0 million was issued in March 2001, related to the private shelf facility. The $55.0 million note has an interest rate 7.43% and is due in equal annual installments of approximately $7.9 million, in the years 2005 through 2011. During each of the years ended August 31, 2006 and 2005, repayments on these notes totaled $11.4 million.

 

In October 2002, we completed a private placement with several insurance companies for long-term debt in the amount of $175.0 million, which was layered into two series. The first series of $115.0 million has an

interest rate of 4.96% and is due in equal semi-annual installments of approximately $8.8 million during the years 2007 through 2013. The second series of $60.0 million has an interest rate of 5.60% and is due in equal semi-annual installments of approximately $4.6 million during fiscal years 2012 through 2018.

 

In March 2004, we entered into a note purchase and private shelf agreement with Prudential Capital Group, primarily for the purpose of financing the purchase of Farmland’s interest in Agriliance, as previously discussed. In April 2004, we borrowed $30.0 million under this arrangement. One long-term note in the amount of $15.0 million has an interest rate of 4.08% and is due in full at the end of the six-year term in 2010. Another long-term note in the amount of $15.0 million has an interest rate of 4.39% and is due in full at the end of the seven-year term in 2011.

 

In September 2004, we entered into a private placement with several insurance companies for long-term debt in the amount of $125.0 million with an interest rate of 5.25%. The debt is due in equal annual installments of $25.0 million during the fiscal years 2011 through 2015.

 

We, through NCRA, had revolving term loans outstanding of $6.0 million and $9.0 million for the years ended August 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Interest rates on August 31, 2006 ranged from 6.48% to 6.99%. Repayments of $3.0 million were made during each of the three years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

 

On August 31, 2006, we had total long-term debt outstanding of $744.7 million, of which $110.5 million was bank financing, $612.1 million was private placement debt and $22.1 million was industrial development revenue bonds and other notes and contracts payable. On August 31, 2005, we had long-term debt outstanding of $773.1 million. Our long-term debt is unsecured except for other notes and contracts in the amount of $8.9 million; however, restrictive covenants under various agreements have requirements for maintenance of minimum working capital levels and other financial ratios. In addition, NCRA term loans of $6.0 million are collateralized by NCRA’s investment in CoBank. We were in compliance with all debt covenants and restrictions as of August 31, 2006. The aggregate amount of long-term debt payable as of August 31, 2006 was as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

During the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004, we borrowed on a long-term basis, $125.0 million and $35.5 million, respectively. There were no long-term borrowings during the year ended August 31, 2006. During the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, we repaid long-term debt of $36.7 million, $36.0 million and $15.3 million, respectively.

 

Distributions to minority owners for the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $80.5 million, $29.9 million and $15.9 million, respectively, and were primarily related to NCRA. NCRA’s cash distributions to members were lower as a percent of earnings in 2005 and 2004 when compared to other years, due to the funding requirements for environmental capital expenditures previously discussed.

 

In accordance with the bylaws and by action of the Board of Directors, annual net earnings from patronage sources are distributed to consenting patrons following the close of each fiscal year. Patronage refunds are calculated based on amounts using financial statement earnings. The cash portion of the patronage distribution is determined annually by the Board of Directors, with the balance issued in the form of capital equity certificates. The patronage earnings from the fiscal year ended August 31, 2005, were primarily distributed during the second fiscal quarter of the year ended August 31, 2006. The cash portion of this distribution deemed by the Board of Directors to be 30% was $62.5 million. During the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004, we distributed cash patronage of $51.6 million and $28.7 million, respectively.

Cash patronage for the year ended August 31, 2006, determined by the Board of Directors to be 35% and to be distributed in fiscal year 2007, is expected to be approximately $130.9 million and is classified as a current liability on the August 31, 2006 Consolidated Balance Sheet in dividends and equities payable.

 

Effective September 1, 2004, redemptions of capital equity certificates approved by the Board of Directors are divided into two pools, one for non-individuals (primarily member cooperatives) who participate in an annual pro-rata program for equities older than 10 years, and another for individual members who are eligible for equity redemptions at age 72 or upon death. Effective September 1, 2006, the 10-year aging factor on the retirement of equity on a pro-rata basis was eliminated for equity redemptions to be paid in fiscal year 2007. The amount that each non-individual member receives under the pro-rata program in any year is determined by multiplying the dollars available for pro-rata redemptions that year as determined by the Board of Directors, by a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of patronage certificates eligible for redemption held by that member, and the denominator of which is the sum of the patronage certificates eligible for redemption held by all eligible non-individual members. In addition to the annual pro-rata program, the Board of Directors has approved an additional $50.0 million of redemptions to be paid in fiscal year 2007, targeting older capital equity certificates. Approximately $40.2 million will be redeemed to active non-individual members, of which the oldest outstanding capital equity certificates will be redeemed through the year 1989. The balance will be available for the redemption of capital equity certificates held by individual members reaching the age of 72, or for the redemption of capital equity certificates held by the estates of deceased members.

 

For the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, we redeemed in cash, equities in accordance with authorization from the Board of Directors in the amounts of $55.9 million, $23.7 million and $10.3 million, respectively. An additional $23.8 million, $20.0 million and $13.0 million of capital equity certificates were redeemed in fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, by issuance of shares of our 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (Preferred Stock). The amount of equities redeemed with each share of Preferred Stock issued was $26.10, $27.58 and $27.10, which was the closing price per share of the stock on the NASDAQ National Market on January 23, 2006, January 24, 2005 and March 2, 2004 respectively. On August 31, 2006, we had 5,864,238 shares of Preferred Stock outstanding with a total redemption value of approximately $146.6 million, excluding accumulated dividends. The Preferred Stock is redeemable at our option after February 1, 2008.

 

We expect redemptions related to the year ended August 31, 2006, that will be distributed in fiscal year 2007, to be approximately $112.4 million. These expected distributions are classified as a current liability on the August 31, 2006 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

The Preferred Stock is listed on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol CHSCP. The Preferred Stock accumulates dividends at a rate of 8% per year, and dividends are payable quarterly.

 

Off Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements

 

Lease Commitments:

 

We have commitments under operating leases for various refinery, manufacturing and transportation equipment, rail cars, vehicles and office space. Some leases include purchase options at not less than fair market value at the end of the lease term.

 

Total rental expense for all operating leases, net of rail car mileage credits received from the railroad and sublease income for the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, was $38.5 million, $31.0 million and $35.3 million, respectively.

Minimum future lease payments required under noncancellable operating leases as of August 31, 2006, were as follows:

 

 

Guarantees:

 

We are a guarantor for lines of credit for related companies. Our bank covenants allow maximum guarantees of $150.0 million, of which $50.1 million was outstanding on August 31, 2006. In addition, our bank covenants allow for guarantees dedicated solely for NCRA in the amount of $125.0 million. All outstanding loans with respective creditors are current as of August 31, 2006.

 

Debt:

 

There is no material off balance sheet debt.

 

Contractual Obligations

 

We had certain contractual obligations at August 31, 2006 which require the following payments to be made:

 

 

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires the use of estimates as well as management’s judgments and assumptions regarding matters that are subjective, uncertain or involve a high degree of complexity, all of which affect the results of operations and financial condition for the periods presented. We believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of estimates, judgments and complexity.

 

Allowances for Doubtful Accounts

 

The allowances for doubtful accounts are maintained at a level considered appropriate by our management based on analyses of credit quality for specific accounts, historical trends of charge-offs and recoveries, and current and projected economic, market and other conditions. Different assumptions, changes in economic circumstances or the deterioration of the financial condition of our customers could result in additional provisions to the allowances for doubtful accounts and increased bad debt expense.

 

Inventory Valuation and Resetrves

 

Grain, processed grains, oilseed and processed oilseeds are stated at net realizable values which approximates market values. All other inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The cost of certain energy inventories (wholesale refined products, crude oil and asphalt), are determined on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method; all other energy inventories are valued on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) and average cost methods. Estimates are used in determining the net realizable value of grain and oilseed and processed grains and oilseeds inventories. These estimates include the measurement of grain in bins and other storage facilities, which use formulas in addition to actual measurements taken to arrive at appropriate quantity. Other determinations made by management include quality of the inventory and estimates for freight. Grain shrink reserves and other reserves that account for spoilage also affect inventory valuations. If estimates regarding the valuation of inventories or the adequacy of reserves are less favorable than management’s assumptions, then additional reserves or write-downs of inventories may be required.

 

Derivative Financial Instruments

 

We enter into exchange-traded commodity futures and options contracts to hedge our exposure to price fluctuations on energy, grain and oilseed transactions to the extent considered practicable for minimizing risk. We do not use derivatives for speculative purposes. Futures and options contracts used for hedging are purchased and sold through regulated commodity exchanges. Fluctuations in inventory valuations, however, may not be completely hedged, due in part to the absence of satisfactory hedging facilities for certain commodities and geographical areas and in part to our assessment of our exposure from expected price fluctuations. We also manage our risks by entering into fixed-price purchase contracts with pre-approved producers and establishing appropriate limits for individual suppliers. Fixed-price sales contracts are entered into with customers of acceptable creditworthiness, as internally evaluated. The fair value of futures and options contracts, are determined primarily from quotes listed on regulated commodity exchanges. Fixed-price purchase and sales contracts are with various counterparties, and the fair values of such contracts are determined from the market price of the underlying product. We are exposed to loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the contracts, and therefore, contract values are reviewed and adjusted to reflect potential nonperformance.

 

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

 

Pension and other postretirement benefits costs and obligations are dependent on assumptions used in calculating such amounts. These assumptions include discount rates, health care cost trend rates, benefits earned, interest costs, expected return on plan assets, mortality rates and other factors. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, actual results that differ from the assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized

expenses and the recorded obligations in future periods. While our management believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may affect our pension and other postretirement obligations and future expenses.

 

Deferred Tax Assets

 

We assess whether a valuation allowance is necessary to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that we believe is more likely than not to be realized. While we have considered future taxable income as well as other factors in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event that we were to determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to our deferred tax assets would be charged to income in the period such determination was made. We are also significantly impacted by the utilization of loss carryforwards and tax benefits primarily passed to us from National Cooperative Refinery Association (NCRA), which are associated with refinery upgrades that enable NCRA to produce ultra-low sulfur fuels. Our net operating loss carryforwards for tax purposes are available to offset future taxable income. If our loss carryforwards are not used, these loss carryforwards will expire.

 

Long-Lived Assets

 

Depreciation and amortization of our property, plant and equipment is provided on the straight-line method by charges to operations at rates based upon the expected useful lives of individual or groups of assets. Economic circumstances or other factors may cause management’s estimates of expected useful lives to differ from actual.

 

All long-lived assets, including property plant and equipment, goodwill, investments in unconsolidated affiliates and other identifiable intangibles, are evaluated for impairment on the basis of undiscounted cash flows at least annually for goodwill, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impaired asset is written down to its estimated fair market value based on the best information available. Estimated fair market value is generally measured by discounting estimated future cash flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate discounted future cash flows and may differ from actual.

 

Environmental Liabilities

 

Liabilities, including legal costs, related to remediation of contaminated properties are recognized when the related costs are considered probable and can be reasonably estimated. Estimates of these costs are based on current available facts, existing technology, undiscounted site-specific costs and currently enacted laws and regulations. Recoveries, if any, are recorded in the period in which recovery is considered probable. It is often difficult to estimate the cost of environmental compliance, remediation and potential claims given the uncertainties regarding the interpretation and enforcement of applicable environmental laws and regulations, the extent of environmental contamination and the existence of alternate cleanup methods. All liabilities are monitored and adjusted as new facts or changes in law or technology occur and management believes adequate provisions have been made for environmental liabilities. Changes in facts or circumstances may have an adverse impact on our consolidated financial results.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

We record revenue from grain and oilseed sales after the commodity has been delivered to its destination and final weights, grades and settlement prices have been agreed upon. All other sales are recognized upon transfer of title, which could occur upon either shipment or receipt by the customer, depending upon the transaction. Amounts billed to a customer as part of a sales transaction related to shipping and handling are included in net sales. Service revenues are recorded only after such services have been rendered, and are included in other revenues.

Effect of Inflation and Foreign Currency Transactions

 

We believe that inflation and foreign currency fluctuations have not had a significant effect on our operations since we conduct essentially all of our business in US dollars.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In March 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations” (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies the term “conditional asset retirement obligation” as used in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” which refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. However, the obligation to perform the asset retirement activity is unconditional even though uncertainty exists about the timing and/or method of settlement. FIN 47 requires that the uncertainty about the timing and/or method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. We have legal asset retirement obligations for certain assets, including our refineries, pipelines and terminals. At this time, we are unable to measure this obligation because it is not possible to estimate when the obligation will be settled. FIN 47 became effective for us in fiscal year 2006 and it did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard.

 

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (SFAS No. 158). SFAS No. 158 requires that employers recognize on a prospective basis the funded status of their defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans on their consolidated balance sheet and recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost. SFAS No. 158 also requires additional disclosures in the notes to financial statements. SFAS No. 158 is effective as of the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. We are currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 158 on our consolidated financial statements.

 

Based on the funded status of our defined benefit pension and postretirement medical plans as of the most recent measurement dates, we would be required to increase its net liabilities for pension and postretirement medical benefits, which would result in a decrease to owners equity in our consolidated balance sheet. The ultimate amounts recorded are highly dependent on a number of assumptions, including the discount rates in effect in 2007, the actual rate of return on pension assets for 2007 and the tax effects of the adjustment. Changes in these assumptions since our last measurement date could increase or decrease the expected impact of implementing SFAS No. 158 in our consolidated financial statements at August 31, 2007.

 

In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) AUG AIR-1, “Accounting for Planned Major Maintenance Activities”, addressing the accounting for planned major maintenance activities which includes refinery turnarounds. This FSP prohibits the use of the accrue-in-advance method of accounting for planned major maintenance activities in annual and interim financial reporting periods but allows the alternative deferral method. The FSP shall be applied to the first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently using the accrue-in-advance method of accounting, but have not yet determined the impact this FSP will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157) to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements by defining fair value, establishing a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expanding disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are in the process of evaluating the effect that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

 

COMMODITY PRICE RISK

 

We are exposed to price fluctuations on energy, grain and oilseed transactions due to fluctuations in the market value of inventories and fixed or partially fixed purchase and sales contracts. Our use of derivative instruments reduces the effects of price volatility, thereby protecting against adverse short-term price movements, while somewhat limiting the benefits of short-term price movements. However, fluctuations in inventory valuations may not be completely hedged, due in part to the absence of satisfactory hedging facilities for certain commodities and geographical areas and in part to our assessment of our exposure from expected price fluctuations.

 

We generally enter into opposite and offsetting positions using futures contracts or options to the extent practical, in order to arrive at a net commodity position within the formal position limits we have established and deemed prudent for each of those commodities. These contracts are purchased and sold through regulated commodity exchanges. The contracts are economic hedges of price risk, but are not designated as or accounted for as, hedging instruments for accounting purposes in any of our operations, with the exception of some contracts included in our Energy segment operations discussed below. These contracts are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value based on quotes listed on regulated commodity exchanges. Unrealized gains and losses on these contracts are recognized in cost of goods sold for financial reporting using market-based prices.

 

We also manage our risks by entering into fixed-price purchase and sales contracts with pre-approved producers and by establishing appropriate limits for individual suppliers. Fixed-price contracts are entered into with customers of acceptable creditworthiness, as internally evaluated. We are also exposed to loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the contracts and, therefore, contract values are reviewed and adjusted to reflect potential nonperformance. These contracts are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value based on the market price of the underlying products listed on regulated commodity exchanges, except for certain fixed-price contracts related to propane in our Energy segment. The propane contracts within our Energy segment meet the normal purchase and sales exemption, and thus are not required to be marked to fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on fixed-price contracts are recognized in cost of goods sold using market-based prices.

 

Changes in the fair values of derivative instruments described above are recognized in earnings in our Consolidated Statements of Operations in the period such changes occur for all operations with the exception of some derivative instruments included in our Energy segment. Included in other current assets on August 31, 2006 and 2005 are derivative assets of $74.3 million and $102.7 million, respectively. Included in accrued expenses on August 31, 2006 and 2005 are derivative liabilities of $97.8 million and $152.8 million, respectively.

 

In our Energy segment, certain financial contracts entered into for the spread between crude oil purchase value and distillate selling price have been designated and accounted for as hedging instruments (cash flow hedges). The unrealized gains or losses of these contracts are deferred to accumulated other comprehensive income in the equity section of our Consolidated Balance Sheet for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006, and will be included in earnings upon settlement. A gain of $2.8 million, net of taxes, was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income for the year ended August 31, 2006, for the change in the fair value of cash flow hedges related to these derivatives. No gains or losses were recorded in the income statement during the year

ended August 31, 2006, since there were no settlements. The contracts expire in fiscal 2008, and we expect $1.9 million, net of taxes, to be included in earnings during the next 12 months.

 

A 10% adverse change in market prices would not materially affect our results of operations, financial position or liquidity, since our operations have effective economic hedging requirements as a general business practice.

 

INTEREST RATE RISK

 

We use fixed and floating rate debt to lessen the effects of interest rate fluctuations on interest expense. Short-term debt used to finance inventories and receivables is represented by notes payable with maturities of 30 days or less so that our blended interest rate for all such notes approximates current market rates. Long-term debt used to finance non-current assets carries various fixed interest rates and is payable at various dates to minimize the effect of market interest rate changes. Our effective interest rate on fixed rate debt outstanding on August 31, 2006 was approximately 6.1%.

 

We entered into interest rate treasury lock instruments to fix interest rates related to a portion of our private placement debts. These instruments were designated and are effective as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes and, accordingly, changes in fair value of $2.1 million, net of taxes, are included in accumulated other comprehensive income. Interest expense for each of the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 includes $0.9 million which relates to the interest rate derivatives. The additional interest expense is an offset to the lower actual interest paid on the outstanding debt instruments.

 

FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK

 

We conduct essentially all of our business in US dollars, except for grain marketing operations in Brazil and purchases of products from Canada, and had minimal risk regarding foreign currency fluctuations during 2006 or in recent years. Foreign currency fluctuations do, however, impact the ability of foreign buyers to purchase US agricultural products and the competitiveness of US agricultural products compared to the same products offered by alternative sources of world supply.

 

The financial statements listed in 15(a)(1) are set forth beginning on page F-1. Financial statement schedules are included in Schedule II in 15(a)(2). Supplementary financial information required by Item 302 of Regulation S-K for each quarter during the years ended August 31, 2006 and 2005 is presented below.

 

 

Restatement of previously issued quarterly financial statements:

 

Our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows previously included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q during fiscal years 2006 and 2005 are restated below to correct an error in the classification of our cash flows received from our interest in joint ventures and distributions made to minority owners. We have determined that a portion of the cash flows from our joint ventures should have been considered a return on our investment and classified as an operating activity as distributions from equity investments, instead of as an investing activity. Additionally, we have previously reported distributions to minority owners as investing activities when they should have been classified as financing activities.

 

The restatements do not have an impact on our Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equities and Comprehensive Income, or total change in cash and cash equivalents on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for any of the quarterly periods. In addition, they did not have an impact on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of those quarterly periods.

 

Summarized results of previously reported and restated Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended November 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:

 

Summarized results of previously reported and restated Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended February 28, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:

 

 

Summarized results of previously reported and restated Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended May 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:

 

 

None.

 

Disclosure of Controls and Procedures:

 

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and we necessarily are required to apply our judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

 

Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of August 31, 2006. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, at the reasonable assurance level, as of August 31, 2006, the end of the period covered in this annual report on Form 10-K. In coming to the conclusion that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of August 31, 2006, we considered, among other things, the change in internal control over financial reporting in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 related to the preparation, review and presentation and disclosure of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in accordance with generally accepted account principles as described below, which resulted in the need to restate our previously issued consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K. Accordingly, our management has concluded that the financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

 

Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting:

 

A material weakness is a control deficiency or a combination of control deficiencies that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Our management has concluded that, prior to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we did not maintain effective controls over the accuracy of the classification of cash flows received from our interest in joint ventures and distributions made to minority interest holders as components of operating activities and financing activities, respectively, in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This control deficiency resulted in the restatement of our consolidated financial statements for fiscal years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004 and each of the quarters of fiscal 2006 and 2005. This control deficiency could result in the misstatement of the classifications of our operating, investing and financing cash flows and could result in a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, management has determined that the control deficiency constituted a material weakness.

 

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we expanded our disclosure controls and procedures to include a thorough review of the classification requirements of each component line item and the individual elements that comprise each line item of the consolidated statements of cash flows in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. We believe the additional control procedures were designed, and implemented, and fully remediate the aforementioned matter related to our disclosure controls and procedures as of August 31, 2006.

 

On August 31, 2006, Provista, a 50% owned joint venture that we consolidate into our financial statements, established a committed revolving line of credit with LaSalle Bank National Association in the amount of $20.0 million, with $12.5 million outstanding on August 31, 2006. We are a guarantor for the line of credit. The amended and restated loan and security agreement is attached as Exhibit 10.28 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

The table below lists our directors of as of August 31, 2006.