Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(mark one)
|
|
|
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ____ to ____
Commission File Number: 000-31225
, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
62-1812853 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
211 Commerce Street, Suite 300, Nashville, Tennessee
|
|
37201 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changes since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Accelerated Filer x |
Non-accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
(do not check if you are a smaller |
|
|
reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
As of July 31, 2008 there were 23,597,090 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share, issued
and outstanding.
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
Report on Form 10-Q
June 30, 2008
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (Pinnacle Financial) may from
time to time make written or oral statements, including statements
contained in this report which may constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). The words expect,
anticipate, intend, consider, plan, believe, seek,
should, estimate, and similar expressions are intended to
identify such forward-looking statements, but other statements may
constitute forward-looking statements. These statements should be
considered subject to various risks and uncertainties. Such
forward-looking statements are made based upon managements belief as
well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to,
management pursuant to safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Pinnacle Financials actual
results may differ materially from the results anticipated in
forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. Such factors
are described in Item 1A. Risk Factors of Pinnacle Financials
Annual Report on Form 10K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
and include, without limitation, (i) unanticipated deterioration in
the financial condition of borrowers resulting in significant
increases in loan losses and provisions for those losses, (ii)
increased competition with other financial institutions, (iii) lack
of sustained growth in the economy in the Nashville and Knoxville,
Tennessee MSAs, (iv) rapid fluctuations or unanticipated changes in
interest rates, (v) the inability of our bank subsidiary, Pinnacle
National Bank, to satisfy regulatory requirements for its expansion
plans, and (vi) changes in state or federal legislation or
regulations applicable to financial service providers, including
banks. Many of such factors are beyond Pinnacle Financials ability
to control or predict, and readers are cautioned not to put undue
reliance on such forward-looking statements. Pinnacle Financial does
not intend to update or reissue any forward-looking statements
contained in this report as a result of new information or other
circumstances that may become known to Pinnacle Financial.
Page 1
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and noninterest-bearing due from banks |
|
$ |
77,109,394 |
|
|
$ |
76,941,931 |
|
Interest-bearing due from banks |
|
|
1,758,085 |
|
|
|
24,706,966 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
66,342,642 |
|
|
|
20,854,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
145,210,121 |
|
|
|
122,503,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
509,972,917 |
|
|
|
495,651,939 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $11,161,323 and
$26,883,473 at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
11,241,469 |
|
|
|
27,033,356 |
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
16,507,630 |
|
|
|
11,251,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
3,032,272,183 |
|
|
|
2,749,640,689 |
|
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(31,788,776 |
) |
|
|
(28,470,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
|
3,000,483,407 |
|
|
|
2,721,170,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
67,096,558 |
|
|
|
68,385,946 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
25,208,539 |
|
|
|
22,636,029 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
16,185,503 |
|
|
|
18,383,004 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
241,988,969 |
|
|
|
243,573,636 |
|
Core deposit intangible, net |
|
|
17,177,922 |
|
|
|
17,325,988 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
54,981,917 |
|
|
|
46,254,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,106,054,952 |
|
|
$ |
3,794,170,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing |
|
$ |
438,458,200 |
|
|
$ |
400,120,147 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
|
390,956,511 |
|
|
|
410,661,187 |
|
Savings and money market accounts |
|
|
719,961,996 |
|
|
|
742,354,465 |
|
Time |
|
|
1,603,136,919 |
|
|
|
1,372,183,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
3,152,513,626 |
|
|
|
2,925,319,116 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
183,188,428 |
|
|
|
156,070,830 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings |
|
|
187,314,802 |
|
|
|
141,666,133 |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
82,476,000 |
|
|
|
82,476,000 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
8,328,868 |
|
|
|
10,374,538 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
10,523,794 |
|
|
|
11,653,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3,624,345,518 |
|
|
|
3,327,560,167 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no
shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $1.00; 90,000,000 shares authorized;
22,587,564 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008 and
22,264,817 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
22,587,564 |
|
|
|
22,264,817 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
393,742,295 |
|
|
|
390,977,308 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
67,577,903 |
|
|
|
54,150,679 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes |
|
|
(2,198,328 |
) |
|
|
(782,510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
481,709,434 |
|
|
|
466,610,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,106,054,952 |
|
|
$ |
3,794,170,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 2
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
42,227,538 |
|
|
$ |
30,555,889 |
|
|
$ |
87,619,700 |
|
|
$ |
59,533,113 |
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
4,792,481 |
|
|
|
3,394,359 |
|
|
|
9,429,758 |
|
|
|
6,740,479 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
1,339,732 |
|
|
|
693,417 |
|
|
|
2,690,769 |
|
|
|
1,362,936 |
|
Federal funds sold and other |
|
|
414,118 |
|
|
|
864,198 |
|
|
|
1,195,035 |
|
|
|
1,610,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
48,773,869 |
|
|
|
35,507,863 |
|
|
|
100,935,262 |
|
|
|
69,247,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
17,719,109 |
|
|
|
14,456,629 |
|
|
|
38,804,742 |
|
|
|
27,993,892 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
567,090 |
|
|
|
1,890,743 |
|
|
|
1,399,143 |
|
|
|
3,602,834 |
|
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings |
|
|
2,805,541 |
|
|
|
1,499,436 |
|
|
|
5,690,127 |
|
|
|
2,906,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
21,091,740 |
|
|
|
17,846,808 |
|
|
|
45,894,012 |
|
|
|
34,503,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
27,682,129 |
|
|
|
17,661,055 |
|
|
|
55,041,250 |
|
|
|
34,743,483 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
2,787,470 |
|
|
|
899,998 |
|
|
|
4,378,593 |
|
|
|
1,687,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
24,894,659 |
|
|
|
16,761,057 |
|
|
|
50,662,657 |
|
|
|
33,055,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
2,684,486 |
|
|
|
1,920,085 |
|
|
|
5,258,223 |
|
|
|
3,717,234 |
|
Investment sales commissions |
|
|
1,220,247 |
|
|
|
850,207 |
|
|
|
2,488,495 |
|
|
|
1,584,767 |
|
Insurance sales commissions |
|
|
589,488 |
|
|
|
628,953 |
|
|
|
1,653,151 |
|
|
|
1,265,915 |
|
Gain on loans and loan participations sold, net |
|
|
879,824 |
|
|
|
638,895 |
|
|
|
1,535,912 |
|
|
|
1,002,201 |
|
Net gain on sale of premises |
|
|
1,010,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,010,881 |
|
|
|
56,078 |
|
Trust fees |
|
|
531,458 |
|
|
|
425,205 |
|
|
|
1,036,458 |
|
|
|
845,495 |
|
Other noninterest income |
|
|
2,142,101 |
|
|
|
1,088,172 |
|
|
|
4,442,768 |
|
|
|
2,105,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
9,058,485 |
|
|
|
5,551,517 |
|
|
|
17,425,888 |
|
|
|
10,577,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits |
|
|
12,502,540 |
|
|
|
8,794,853 |
|
|
|
26,369,277 |
|
|
|
17,061,354 |
|
Equipment and occupancy |
|
|
3,226,932 |
|
|
|
2,412,528 |
|
|
|
7,503,205 |
|
|
|
4,577,230 |
|
Marketing and other business development |
|
|
478,507 |
|
|
|
430,291 |
|
|
|
854,378 |
|
|
|
682,026 |
|
Postage and supplies |
|
|
843,287 |
|
|
|
524,197 |
|
|
|
1,491,627 |
|
|
|
979,114 |
|
Amortization of core deposit intangible |
|
|
758,033 |
|
|
|
515,755 |
|
|
|
1,524,066 |
|
|
|
1,031,508 |
|
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
3,916,573 |
|
|
|
1,806,680 |
|
|
|
6,369,214 |
|
|
|
3,276,764 |
|
Merger related expense |
|
|
1,349,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,455,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
23,075,148 |
|
|
|
14,484,304 |
|
|
|
48,566,806 |
|
|
|
27,607,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
10,877,996 |
|
|
|
7,828,270 |
|
|
|
19,521,739 |
|
|
|
16,024,623 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,916,863 |
|
|
|
2,402,405 |
|
|
|
5,495,816 |
|
|
|
4,996,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
7,961,133 |
|
|
$ |
5,425,865 |
|
|
$ |
14,025,923 |
|
|
$ |
11,027,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
22,356,667 |
|
|
|
15,494,522 |
|
|
|
22,248,292 |
|
|
|
15,464,151 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
23,629,234 |
|
|
|
16,664,213 |
|
|
|
23,519,844 |
|
|
|
16,640,977 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 3
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balances, December 31, 2006 |
|
|
15,446,074 |
|
|
$ |
15,446,074 |
|
|
$ |
211,502,516 |
|
|
$ |
31,109,324 |
|
|
$ |
(2,040,893 |
) |
|
$ |
256,017,021 |
|
Exercise of employee common
stock options and related
tax benefits |
|
|
70,981 |
|
|
|
70,981 |
|
|
|
525,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596,197 |
|
Issuance of restricted
common shares pursuant to
2004 Equity Incentive Plan |
|
|
28,526 |
|
|
|
28,526 |
|
|
|
(28,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense for
restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,747 |
|
Compensation expense for
stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
801,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
801,705 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,027,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,027,705 |
|
Net unrealized holding
losses on
available-for-sale
securities, net of
deferred tax benefit of $1,285,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,369,881 |
) |
|
|
(3,369,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,657,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, June 30, 2007 |
|
|
15,545,581 |
|
|
$ |
15,545,581 |
|
|
$ |
212,922,658 |
|
|
$ |
42,137,029 |
|
|
$ |
(5,410,774 |
) |
|
$ |
265,194,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
22,264,817 |
|
|
$ |
22,264,817 |
|
|
$ |
390,977,308 |
|
|
$ |
54,150,679 |
|
|
$ |
(782,510 |
) |
|
$ |
466,610,294 |
|
Cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle due
to adoption of EITF 06-4,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598,699 |
) |
Exercise of employee common
stock options and stock
appreciation rights and
common stock warrants and
related tax benefits |
|
|
176,504 |
|
|
|
176,504 |
|
|
|
1,895,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,071,863 |
|
Issuance of restricted
common shares pursuant to
2004 Equity Incentive Plan |
|
|
146,243 |
|
|
|
146,243 |
|
|
|
(146,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense for
restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,625 |
|
Compensation expense for
stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
973,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
973,246 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,025,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,025,923 |
|
Net unrealized holding
losses on
available-for-sale
securities, net of
deferred tax benefit of $862,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,415,818 |
) |
|
|
(1,415,818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,610,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, June 30, 2008 |
|
|
22,587,564 |
|
|
$ |
22,587,564 |
|
|
$ |
393,742,295 |
|
|
$ |
67,577,903 |
|
|
$ |
(2,198,328 |
) |
|
$ |
481,709,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 4
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,025,923 |
|
|
$ |
11,027,705 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of premium on securities |
|
|
372,333 |
|
|
|
256,167 |
|
Depreciation and net amortization |
|
|
3,013,790 |
|
|
|
1,040,380 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
4,378,593 |
|
|
|
1,687,964 |
|
Gains on loans and loan participations sold, net |
|
|
(1,535,912 |
) |
|
|
(1,002,201 |
) |
Net gains on sale of premises |
|
|
(1,010,881 |
) |
|
|
(56,078 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
1,015,871 |
|
|
|
923,452 |
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
636,941 |
|
|
|
(328,621 |
) |
Other |
|
|
242,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation |
|
|
(400,435 |
) |
|
|
(94,640 |
) |
Mortgage loans held for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans originated |
|
|
(143,182,739 |
) |
|
|
(81,770,437 |
) |
Loans sold |
|
|
139,449,854 |
|
|
|
83,242,466 |
|
Decrease in other assets |
|
|
7,946,519 |
|
|
|
1,263,176 |
|
Decrease in other liabilities |
|
|
(4,239,365 |
) |
|
|
(3,561,695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
20,712,752 |
|
|
|
12,627,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activities in securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(105,649,364 |
) |
|
|
(19,457,551 |
) |
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities, prepayments and calls |
|
|
88,719,393 |
|
|
|
20,329,160 |
|
Activities in securities held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities, prepayments and calls |
|
|
15,750,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Increase in loans, net |
|
|
(297,159,343 |
) |
|
|
(164,558,472 |
) |
Purchases of premises and equipment and software |
|
|
(4,331,291 |
) |
|
|
(3,647,382 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of premises and equipment and software |
|
|
2,821,702 |
|
|
|
278,278 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and other entities |
|
|
(2,093,733 |
) |
|
|
(823,474 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(301,942,636 |
) |
|
|
(167,729,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits |
|
|
228,641,510 |
|
|
|
175,588,408 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
27,117,598 |
|
|
|
(573,178 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in Federal funds purchased |
|
|
(39,862,000 |
) |
|
|
20,000,000 |
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
85,225,925 |
|
|
|
45,000,000 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(8,607,114 |
) |
|
|
(72,027,219 |
) |
Net increase in borrowings under lines of credit |
|
|
9,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of common stock options |
|
|
2,019,788 |
|
|
|
501,557 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation |
|
|
400,435 |
|
|
|
94,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
303,936,142 |
|
|
|
168,584,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
22,706,258 |
|
|
|
13,482,405 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
122,503,863 |
|
|
|
92,518,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
145,210,121 |
|
|
$ |
106,001,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 5
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Business Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (Pinnacle Financial) is a bank holding
company whose primary business is conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pinnacle National Bank
(Pinnacle National). Pinnacle National is a commercial bank headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee.
Pinnacle National provides a full range of banking services in its primary market areas of the
Nashville-Davidson-Rutherford-Franklin and Knoxville Metropolitan Statistical Areas.
In addition to Pinnacle National, Pinnacle Financial, for the time period following its merger
with Mid-America Bancshares, Inc. (Mid-America) on November 30, 2007 through February 29, 2008,
conducted banking operations through the two banks formerly owned by Mid-America: PrimeTrust Bank
in Nashville, Tennessee and Bank of the South in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee. On February 29, 2008,
Pinnacle National purchased all of the assets and assumed all of the liabilities of PrimeTrust Bank
and contemporaneously, through a series of transactions, sold the PrimeTrust Bank charter and
rights to operate a branch in Tennessee to an unaffiliated out-of-state third party for $500,000.
Pinnacle Financial also merged Bank of the South into Pinnacle National on that date. References
to Pinnacle National as of December 31, 2007 include PrimeTrust Bank and Bank of the South.
Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all
information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of
operations, and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles All
adjustments consisting of normally recurring accruals that, in the opinion of management, are
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the
periods covered by the report have been included. The accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Pinnacle Financial consolidated
financial statements and related notes appearing in the 2007 Annual Report previously filed on Form
10-K.
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pinnacle Financial and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. PNFP Statutory Trust I, PNFP Statutory Trust II, PNFP Statutory Trust
III, PNFP Statutory Trust IV and Collateral Plus, LLC, are affiliates of Pinnacle Financial and are
included in these consolidated financial statements pursuant to the equity method of accounting.
Significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities
as of the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly
susceptible to significant change in the near term include the determination of the allowance for
loan losses.
Cash Flow Information Supplemental cash flow information addressing certain cash payments
and noncash transactions for each of the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash Payments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
45,403,484 |
|
|
$ |
35,975,282 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
3,700,000 |
|
|
|
7,850,000 |
|
Noncash Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged-off to the allowance for loan losses |
|
|
1,786,464 |
|
|
|
552,180 |
|
Loans foreclosed upon with repossessions transferred to other assets |
|
|
13,880,435 |
|
|
|
110,570 |
|
Net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred tax
benefit |
|
|
1,415,818 |
|
|
|
3,369,881 |
|
Income Per Common Share Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income
by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the
dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or
converted. The difference between basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding was
Page 6
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
attributable to common stock options, common stock appreciation rights, warrants and
restricted shares. The dilutive effect of outstanding options, common stock appreciation rights,
warrants and restricted shares is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the
treasury stock method.
As of June 30, 2008, there were 2,365,000 stock options and 14,000 stock appreciation rights
outstanding to purchase common shares. As of June 30, 2007, there were 1,902,000 stock options
outstanding to purchase common shares. Most of these options and stock appreciation rights have
exercise prices, which when considered in relation to the average market price of Pinnacle
Financials common stock, are considered dilutive and are considered in Pinnacle Financials
diluted income per share calculation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
There were common stock options of 633,000 and 221,000 outstanding as of June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, which were considered anti-dilutive and thus have not been considered in the diluted
earnings per share calculations below. Additionally, as of June 30, 2008 and 2007, Pinnacle
Financial had outstanding warrants to purchase 370,000 and 395,000, respectively, of common shares
which have been considered in the calculation of Pinnacle Financials diluted net income per share
for three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
The following is a summary of the basic and diluted earnings per share calculation for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, |
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Basic earnings per share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator - Net income |
|
$ |
7,961,133 |
|
|
$ |
5,425,865 |
|
|
$ |
14,025,923 |
|
|
$ |
11,027,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator - Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
22,356,667 |
|
|
|
15,494,522 |
|
|
|
22,248,292 |
|
|
|
15,464,151 |
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator - Net income |
|
$ |
7,961,133 |
|
|
$ |
5,425,865 |
|
|
$ |
14,025,923 |
|
|
$ |
11,027,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator - Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
22,356,667 |
|
|
|
15,494,522 |
|
|
|
22,248,292 |
|
|
|
15,464,151 |
|
Dilutive shares contingently issuable |
|
|
1,272,567 |
|
|
|
1,169,691 |
|
|
|
1,271,552 |
|
|
|
1,176,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average diluted common shares outstanding |
|
|
23,629,234 |
|
|
|
16,664,213 |
|
|
|
23,519,844 |
|
|
|
16,640,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements Pinnacle Financial acquired Cavalry Banking, Inc.
in March of 2006. Certain executives and directors of Cavalry Banking, Inc. were participants in a
deferred compensation arrangement which included split-dollar life insurance arrangements. In
September 2006, the FASB ratified the consensuses reached by the Task Force on Issue No. 06-4 (EITF
06-4) Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements. The EITF concluded that deferred compensation or
postretirement benefit aspects of an endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangement should be
recognized as a liability by the employer and the obligation is not effectively settled by the
purchase of a life insurance policy. The effective date was for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2007. On January 1, 2008, we adopted this EITF as a change in accounting principle
and recorded a liability of $985,000 along with a corresponding adjustment to beginning retained
earnings, net of tax.
Fair Value Measurement - In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157 (SFAS 157), Fair Value
Measurements SFAS 157, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 applies only to fair-value measurements that are already required or
permitted by other accounting standards and is expected to increase the consistency of those
measurements. The definition of fair value focuses on the
Page 7
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
exit price, i.e., the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, not the
entry price, i.e., the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the
liability at the measurement date. The statement emphasizes that fair value is a market-based
measurement; not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, the fair value measurement should be
determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability. The effective date for SFAS No. 157 is for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Pinnacle Financial partially adopted SFAS 157
effective January 1, 2008 for financial assets and liabilities. The partial adoption of SFAS 157
had no impact on the consolidated financial statements of Pinnacle Financial. SFAS 157 has not
been applied to nonfinancial assets and liabilities pursuant to FSP FAS 157-2. This standard is
applicable for nonfinancial assets and liabilities for fiscal periods beginning after November 30,
2008. There was no cumulative adjustment required upon partial adoption of SFAS 157.
In February of 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 (SFAS 159), The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which gives entities the option to measure eligible
financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value, on an instrument by instrument basis,
that are otherwise not permitted to be accounted for at fair value under other accounting
standards. The election to use the fair value option is available when an entity first recognizes a
financial asset or financial liability. Subsequent changes in fair value must be recorded in
earnings. This statement was effective as of January 1, 2008; however, it had no impact on the
consolidated financial statements of Pinnacle Financial because Pinnacle Financial did not elect
the fair value option for any financial instrument not presently being accounted for at fair value.
Pinnacle Financial has an established process for determining fair values. Fair value is based
upon quoted market prices, where available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair
value is based upon internally developed models or processes that use primarily market-based or
independently-sourced market data, including interest rate yield curves, option volatilities and
third party information. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are
recorded at fair value. Furthermore, while Pinnacle Financial believes its valuation methods are
appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies, or
assumptions, to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a
different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
Valuation Hierarchy
SFAS 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value
measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of
an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows.
|
|
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for
substantially the full term of the financial instrument. |
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. |
A financial instruments categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Following is a
description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as
the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
Assets
Securities Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified
within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government
securities and certain other products. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values
are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or
Page 8
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
discounted cash flows. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency
around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within level 3 of the valuation
hierarchy.
Mortgage
loans held-for-sale Mortgage loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost
or fair value and are classified within level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. The inputs for
valuation of these assets are based on the anticipated sales price of these loans as the loans are
usually sold within a few weeks of their origination.
Impaired loans A loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable Pinnacle Financial
will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due in accordance with the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. Individually identified impaired loans are measured based
on the present value of expected payments using the loans original effective rate as the discount
rate, the loans observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is
collateral dependent. If the recorded investment in the impaired loan exceeds the measure of fair
value, a valuation allowance may be established as a component of the allowance for loan losses.
Impaired loans are classified within level 3 of the hierarchy.
Other investments Included in other investments are investments in certain nonpublic
private equity funds. The valuation of nonpublic private equity investments requires significant
management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity and the
long-term nature of such assets. These investments are valued initially based upon transaction
price. The carrying values of other investments are adjusted either upwards or downwards from the
transaction price to reflect expected exit values as evidenced by financing and sale transactions
with third parties, or when determination of a valuation adjustment is confirmed through ongoing
reviews by senior investment managers. A variety of factors are reviewed and monitored to assess
positive and negative changes in valuation including, but not limited to, current operating
performance and future expectations of the particular investment, industry valuations of comparable
public companies, changes in market outlook and the third-party financing environment over time. In
determining valuation adjustments resulting from the investment review process, emphasis is placed
on current company performance and market conditions. These equity investments are included in
level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Other assets Included in other assets are certain assets carried at fair value, including
the cash value of bank owned life insurance policies and interest rate swap agreements. The
carrying amount of bank owned life insurance is based on information received from the insurance
carriers indicating the financial performance of the policies and the amount Pinnacle Financial
would receive should the policies be surrendered. Pinnacle Financial reflects these assets within
level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The carrying amount of interest rate swap agreements is based
on information obtained from a third party bank. Pinnacle Financial reflects these assets within
level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
Liabilities
Other liabilities Pinnacle Financial has certain liabilities carried at fair value
including certain interest rate swap agreements. The fair value of these liabilities is based on
information obtained from a third party bank and is reflected within level 2 of the valuation
hierarchy.
Page 9
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of June 30,
2008, by caption on the consolidated balance sheets and by SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy (as
described above) (dollars in thousands):
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
models with |
|
|
Internal models |
|
|
|
carrying |
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
significant |
|
|
with significant |
|
|
|
value in the |
|
|
market prices |
|
|
observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
consolidated |
|
|
in an active |
|
|
market |
|
|
market |
|
|
|
balance sheet |
|
|
market |
|
|
parameters |
|
|
parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
509,973 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
509,973 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
16,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments |
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
35,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
35,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
563,827 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
527,289 |
|
|
$ |
36,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
865 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
865 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
models with |
|
|
Internal models |
|
|
|
carrying |
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
significant |
|
|
with significant |
|
|
|
value in the |
|
|
market prices |
|
|
observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
consolidated |
|
|
in an active |
|
|
market |
|
|
market |
|
|
|
balance sheet |
|
|
market |
|
|
parameters |
|
|
parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
13,067 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,067 |
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
13,067 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in level 3 fair value measurements
The table below includes a rollforward of the balance sheet amounts for the second quarter of
2008 (including the change in fair value) for financial instruments classified by Pinnacle
Financial within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis. When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within
level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the determination is based upon the significance of the
unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurement. However, since level 3 financial
instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or level 3 components, observable
components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources),
the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due in part to observable
factors that are part of the valuation methodology.
Page 10
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 (in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Fair value, January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
35,336 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total realized and unrealized gains
included in income |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net |
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or out of level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value, June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
36,538 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrealized gains included in income
related to financial assets and liabilities
still on the consolidated balance sheet at June
30, 2008 |
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 2. Merger with Mid-America Bancshares, Inc.
On November 30, 2007, Pinnacle Financial consummated its merger with Mid-America, a two-bank
holding company headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee.
In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Accounting for Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141), SFAS
No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142) and SFAS No. 147, Acquisition of
Certain Financial Institutions (SFAS No. 147), Pinnacle Financial recorded at fair value the
following assets and liabilities of Mid-America as of November 30, 2007. The table below details
the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2007 and the
updated amounts as of June 30, 2008 for changes in the purchase price allocation recorded during
the six months ended June 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchase price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2007 |
|
|
allocation |
|
|
Revised November |
|
|
|
purchase price |
|
|
recorded during |
|
|
30, 2007 purchase |
|
Mid-America Purchase Price Allocation (1) |
|
allocation |
|
|
first half of 2008 |
|
|
price allocation |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
60,795 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
60,795 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
147,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,766 |
|
Loans, net of an allowance for loan losses of $8,695 |
|
|
855,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
855,887 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
129,334 |
|
|
|
(1,585 |
) |
|
|
127,749 |
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
8,085 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
9,436 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
49,854 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
49,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
1,251,721 |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
1,251,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
957,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
957,076 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
61,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,383 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
27,107 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
27,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
1,045,566 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
1,045,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration paid for Mid-America |
|
$ |
206,155 |
|
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
|
$ |
205,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pinnacle Financial is still in the process of finalizing the allocation of the
purchase price to the acquired net assets noted above. Accordingly, the above allocations
should be considered preliminary as of June 30, 2008. |
In accordance with SFAS Nos. 141 and 142, Pinnacle Financial has preliminarily recognized $9.4
million as a core deposit intangible through June 30, 2008. This identified intangible is being
amortized over ten years using an accelerated method which anticipates the life of the underlying
deposits to which the intangible is attributable. For the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, approximately $264,000 and $537,000 was recognized in the accompanying consolidated statement
of income as other
Page 11
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
noninterest expense. Amortization expense associated with this identified intangible will
approximate $700,000 to $1.1 million per year for the next ten years.
At November 30, 2007, Pinnacle Financial also recorded other adjustments to the carrying value
of Mid-Americas assets and liabilities in order to reflect the fair value at the date of
acquisition. The discounts and premiums related to financial assets and liabilities are being
accreted and amortized into the consolidated statements of income using a method that approximates
the level yield over the anticipated lives of the underlying financial assets or liabilities. For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the accretion and amortization of the fair value
discounts and premiums related to the acquired assets and liabilities increased net interest income
by approximately $700,000 and $1.8 million, respectively. Based on the estimated useful lives of
the acquired loans, deposits and FHLB advances, Pinnacle Financial will recognize increases in net
interest income related to accretion of these purchase accounting adjustments of $2.11 million in
future periods.
The following pro forma income statements assume the merger was consummated on January 1, 2007
and thus the amounts in the pro forma information below will differ from the actual results as
presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The pro forma information does
not reflect Pinnacle Financials results of operations that would have actually occurred had the
merger been consummated on such date (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Pro Forma Income Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
53,640 |
|
|
$ |
52,570 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
2,288 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
17,426 |
|
|
|
14,538 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
48,551 |
|
|
|
42,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before taxes |
|
|
18,136 |
|
|
|
22,143 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
4,952 |
|
|
|
7,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,184 |
|
|
$ |
15,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Per Share Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
22,248,292 |
|
|
|
22,140,731 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
23,519,844 |
|
|
|
23,317,557 |
|
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, Pinnacle Financial incurred merger
integration expense related to the merger with Mid-America of $1,349,000 and $4,455,000,
respectively. These expenses were directly related to the merger and consisted primarily of
retention awards and costs to integrate systems and are reflected on the accompanying consolidated
statement of income as merger related expense.
Following the merger with Mid-America, on February 29, 2008, Pinnacle National purchased all
of the assets and assumed all of the liabilities of PrimeTrust Bank and simultaneously sold the
charter of PrimeTrust Bank to an unaffiliated third party for $500,000. Pinnacle Financial also
merged Bank of the South into Pinnacle National on that date, leaving Pinnacle National as the sole
banking subsidiary of Pinnacle Financial. Goodwill was reduced for the proceeds of the sale of the
charter, and therefore no gain was recorded.
Page 12
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 3. Securities
The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at
June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
|
48,508,439 |
|
|
|
197,150 |
|
|
|
208,772 |
|
|
|
48,496,817 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
338,351,273 |
|
|
|
1,102,364 |
|
|
|
3,803,162 |
|
|
|
335,650,475 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
124,849,787 |
|
|
|
870,640 |
|
|
|
1,767,631 |
|
|
|
123,952,796 |
|
Corporate notes and other |
|
|
1,912,623 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
40,375 |
|
|
|
1,872,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
513,622,122 |
|
|
$ |
2,170,735 |
|
|
$ |
5,819,940 |
|
|
$ |
509,972,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
$ |
1,997,776 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,198 |
|
|
$ |
1,982,578 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
9,243,693 |
|
|
|
7,325 |
|
|
|
72,273 |
|
|
|
9,178,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,241,469 |
|
|
$ |
7,325 |
|
|
$ |
87,471 |
|
|
$ |
11,161,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. Government agency securities |
|
|
69,481,328 |
|
|
|
220,833 |
|
|
|
39,598 |
|
|
|
69,662,563 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
297,909,174 |
|
|
|
1,237,807 |
|
|
|
1,441,635 |
|
|
|
297,705,346 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
127,220,978 |
|
|
|
206,102 |
|
|
|
1,521,273 |
|
|
|
125,905,807 |
|
Corporate notes |
|
|
2,415,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,560 |
|
|
|
2,378,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
497,027,263 |
|
|
$ |
1,664,742 |
|
|
$ |
3,040,066 |
|
|
$ |
495,651,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
$ |
17,747,589 |
|
|
$ |
4,436 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,752,025 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
9,285,767 |
|
|
|
4,242 |
|
|
|
158,561 |
|
|
|
9,131,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,033,356 |
|
|
$ |
8,678 |
|
|
$ |
158,561 |
|
|
$ |
26,883,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008, approximately $502.3 million of Pinnacle Financials investment portfolio
was pledged to secure public funds and other deposits and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase.
Page 13
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, included in securities were the following investments
with unrealized losses. The information below classifies these investments according to the term
of the unrealized loss of less than twelve months or twelve months or longer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments with an |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Loss of less than |
|
|
Investments with an Unrealized |
|
|
Total Investments with an |
|
|
|
12 months |
|
|
Loss of 12 months or longer |
|
|
Unrealized Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
At June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
$ |
25,839,975 |
|
|
$ |
221,754 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,839,975 |
|
|
$ |
221,754 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
217,684,301 |
|
|
|
3,227,306 |
|
|
|
22,780,968 |
|
|
|
578,342 |
|
|
|
240,465,269 |
|
|
|
3,805,648 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
84,722,135 |
|
|
|
1,643,846 |
|
|
|
4,881,467 |
|
|
|
196,058 |
|
|
|
89,603,602 |
|
|
|
1,839,904 |
|
Corporate notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
949,605 |
|
|
|
40,375 |
|
|
|
949,605 |
|
|
|
40,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily-impaired securities |
|
$ |
328,246,411 |
|
|
$ |
5,092,906 |
|
|
$ |
28,612,040 |
|
|
$ |
814,775 |
|
|
$ |
356,858,451 |
|
|
$ |
5,907,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
$ |
13,942,078 |
|
|
$ |
25,198 |
|
|
$ |
2,985,600 |
|
|
$ |
14,400 |
|
|
$ |
16,927,678 |
|
|
$ |
39,598 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
51,240,090 |
|
|
|
181,098 |
|
|
|
97,593,453 |
|
|
|
1,260,537 |
|
|
|
148.833.543 |
|
|
|
1.441.635 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
54,467,544 |
|
|
|
1,193,763 |
|
|
|
35,481,739 |
|
|
|
486,071 |
|
|
|
89,949,283 |
|
|
|
1,679,834 |
|
Corporate notes |
|
|
527,115 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
1,451,108 |
|
|
|
37,260 |
|
|
|
1,978,223 |
|
|
|
37,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily-impaired securities |
|
$ |
120,176,827 |
|
|
$ |
1,400,359 |
|
|
$ |
137,511,900 |
|
|
$ |
1,798,268 |
|
|
$ |
257,688,727 |
|
|
$ |
3,198,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation.
Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been
less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the
intent and ability of Pinnacle Financial to retain its investment in the issue for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Because the declines in fair value
noted above were attributable to increases in interest rates and not attributable to credit quality
and because Pinnacle Financial has the ability and intent to hold all of these investments until a
market price recovery or maturity, the impairment of these investments is not deemed to be
other-than-temporary.
Note 4. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The composition of loans at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 is summarized in the table
below. Loans have been reclassified at December 31, 2007 to be consistent with the June 30, 2008
classification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
|
$ |
831,828,849 |
|
|
$ |
710,545,533 |
|
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
|
|
587,025,080 |
|
|
|
539,768,302 |
|
Construction and land development |
|
|
632,764,382 |
|
|
|
582,958,584 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
886,655,914 |
|
|
|
794,419,213 |
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
93,997,958 |
|
|
|
121,949,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
3,032,272,183 |
|
|
|
2,749,640,689 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(31,788,776 |
) |
|
|
(28,470,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
$ |
3,000,483,407 |
|
|
$ |
2,721,170,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 14
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and for the
year ended December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
28,470,207 |
|
|
$ |
16,117,978 |
|
Charged-off loans |
|
|
(1,786,464 |
) |
|
|
(1,341,890 |
) |
Recovery of previously charged-off loans |
|
|
726,440 |
|
|
|
279,491 |
|
Allowance from Mid-America acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,694,787 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
4,378,593 |
|
|
|
4,719,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
31,788,776 |
|
|
$ |
28,470,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008 and at December 31, 2007, Pinnacle Financial had impaired loans on
nonaccruing interest status. The principal balance of these nonaccrual loans amounted to
$13,067,000 and $19,677,000 at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. In each case, at
the date such loans were placed on nonaccrual status, Pinnacle Financial reversed all previously
accrued interest income against current year earnings. Had nonaccruing loans been on accruing
status, interest income would have been higher by $624,000 and $230,000 for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
At June 30, 2008, Pinnacle Financial had granted loans and other extensions of credit
amounting to approximately $28,730,000 to directors, executive officers, and their related
entities, of which $20,618,000 had been drawn upon. During the six months ended June 30, 2008,
$2,340,000 of loan and other commitment increases and $1,263,000 of principal and other reductions
were made by directors, executive officers, and their related entities. The terms on these loans
and extensions are on substantially the same terms customary for other persons for the type of loan
involved. None of these loans to directors, executive officers, and their related entities, were
impaired at June 30, 2008.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, Pinnacle Financial sold
participations in certain loans to correspondent banks at an interest rate that was less than that
of the borrowers rate of interest. In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, Pinnacle Financial recognized a net gain on the sale of these participated loans for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 of approximately $13,000 and $212,000, respectively,
which is attributable to the present value of the future net cash flows of the difference between
the interest payments the borrower is projected to pay Pinnacle Financial and the amount of
interest that will be owed the correspondent bank based on their participation in the loans. Net
gains recognized for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $8,000 and $167,000,
respectively. At June 30, 2008, Pinnacle Financial was servicing $132 million of loans for
correspondent banks and other entities, of which $125 million were commercial loans.
Note 5. Income Taxes
Pinnacle Financials income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by applying the
Federal income tax statutory rates of 35% to income before income taxes. A reconciliation of the
differences for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months |
|
|
For the six months |
|
|
|
ended June 30, |
|
|
ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Income taxes at statutory rate |
|
$ |
3,807,299 |
|
|
$ |
2,739,894 |
|
|
$ |
6,832,609 |
|
|
$ |
5,608,618 |
|
State tax (benefit) expense,
net of Federal tax effect |
|
|
(143,947 |
) |
|
|
32,546 |
|
|
|
(158,804 |
) |
|
|
90,410 |
|
Federal tax credits |
|
|
(122,375 |
) |
|
|
(90,000 |
) |
|
|
(180,000 |
) |
|
|
(180,000 |
) |
Tax-exempt securities |
|
|
(552,903 |
) |
|
|
(202,123 |
) |
|
|
(849,521 |
) |
|
|
(398,730 |
) |
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(153,282 |
) |
|
|
(46,654 |
) |
|
|
(234,379 |
) |
|
|
(94,788 |
) |
Insurance premiums |
|
|
(144,351 |
) |
|
|
(102,431 |
) |
|
|
(207,535 |
) |
|
|
(204,861 |
) |
Other items |
|
|
226,422 |
|
|
|
71,173 |
|
|
|
293,446 |
|
|
|
176,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
2,916,863 |
|
|
$ |
2,402,405 |
|
|
$ |
5,495,816 |
|
|
$ |
4,996,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rate for 2008 and 2007 is impacted by Federal tax credits related to the New
Markets Tax Credit program whereby a subsidiary of Pinnacle National has been awarded approximately
$2.3 million in future Federal tax credits which are available through 2010. Tax benefits related
to these credits will be recognized for financial reporting purposes in the same periods
Page 15
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
that the credits are recognized in the Companys income tax returns. The credit that was
available for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $360,000. Pinnacle Financial believes
that it will comply with the various regulatory provisions of the New Markets Tax Credit program,
and therefore has reflected the impact of the credits in its estimated annual effective tax rate
for 2008 and 2007.
Note 6. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
In the normal course of business, Pinnacle Financial has entered into off-balance sheet
financial instruments which include commitments to extend credit (i.e., including unfunded lines of
credit) and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are usually the result of lines
of credit granted to existing borrowers under agreements that the total outstanding indebtedness
will not exceed a specific amount during the term of the indebtedness. Typical borrowers are
commercial concerns that use lines of credit to supplement their treasury management functions,
thus their total outstanding indebtedness may fluctuate during any time period based on the
seasonality of their business and the resultant timing of their cash flows. Other typical lines of
credit are related to home equity loans granted to consumers. Commitments to extend credit
generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a
fee.
Standby letters of credit are generally issued on behalf of an applicant (our customer) to a
specifically named beneficiary and are the result of a particular business arrangement that exists
between the applicant and the beneficiary. Standby letters of credit have fixed expiration dates
and are usually for terms of two years or less unless terminated beforehand due to criteria
specified in the standby letter of credit. A typical arrangement involves the applicant routinely
being indebted to the beneficiary for such items as inventory purchases, insurance, utilities,
lease guarantees or other third party commercial transactions. The standby letter of credit would
permit the beneficiary to obtain payment from Pinnacle Financial under certain prescribed
circumstances. Subsequently, Pinnacle Financial would then seek reimbursement from the applicant
pursuant to the terms of the standby letter of credit.
Pinnacle Financial follows the same credit policies and underwriting practices when making
these commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Each customers creditworthiness is
evaluated on a case-by-case basis, and the amount of collateral obtained, if any, is based on
managements credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include cash, real
estate and improvements, marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, and
personal property.
The contractual amounts of these commitments are not reflected in the consolidated financial
statements and would only be reflected if drawn upon. Since many of the commitments are expected
to expire without being drawn upon, the contractual amounts do not necessarily represent future
cash requirements. However, should the commitments be drawn upon and should our customers default
on their resulting obligation to us, Pinnacle Financials maximum exposure to credit loss, without
consideration of collateral, is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.
A summary of Pinnacle Financials total contractual amount for all off-balance sheet
commitments at June 30, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
823,752,000 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
89,153,000 |
|
Various legal claims also arise from time to time in the normal course of business. In the
opinion of management, the resolution of these claims outstanding at June 30, 2008 will not have a
material impact on Pinnacle Financials financial statements.
Visa Litigation Pinnacle National is a member of the Visa USA network. Under Visa USA
bylaws, Visa members are obligated to indemnify Visa USA and/or its parent company, Visa, Inc.
(Visa), for potential future settlement of, or judgments resulting from, certain litigation, which
Visa refers to as the covered litigation. Pinnacle Nationals indemnification obligation is
limited to its membership proportion of Visa USA. On November 7, 2007, Visa announced the
settlement of its American Express litigation, and disclosed in its annual report to the SEC on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007 that Visa had accrued a contingent liability for
the estimated settlement of its Discover litigation. Accordingly, Pinnacle National expensed and
recognized a contingent liability in the amount of $145,000 as an estimate for its membership
proportion of the American Express settlement and the potential Discover settlement, as well as its
membership proportion of the amount that Pinnacle National estimates will be required for Visa to
settle the remaining covered litigation.
Page 16
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Visa completed an initial public offering (IPO) in March 2008. Visa used a portion of the
proceeds from the IPO to establish a $3.0 billion escrow for settlement of covered litigation and
used substantially all of the remaining portion to redeem class B and class C shares held by Visa
issuing members. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, Pinnacle Financial recognized a
pre-tax gain of $140,000 on redemption proceeds received from Visa, Inc. and reversed $63,000 of
the $145,000 litigation expense recognized as its pro-rata share of the $3.0 billion escrow funded
by Visa, Inc. The timing for ultimate settlement of all covered litigation is not determinable at
this time. There were no further developments during the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Note 7. Equity Compensation
Pinnacle Financial has two equity incentive plans under which it has granted stock options to
its employees to purchase common stock at or above the fair market value on the date of grant and
granted restricted share awards to employees and directors. At June 30, 2008, there were 448,183
shares available for issue under these plans.
During the first quarter of 2006 and in connections with its merger with Cavalry, Pinnacle
Financial assumed a third equity incentive plan, the 1999 Cavalry Bancorp, Inc. Stock Option Plan
(the Cavalry Plan). All options granted under the Cavalry Plan were fully vested prior to
Pinnacle Financials merger with Cavalry and expire at various dates between January 2011 and June
2012. In connection with the merger, all options to acquire Cavalry common stock were converted to
options to acquire Pinnacle Financials common stock at the 0.95 exchange ratio. The exercise
price of the outstanding options under the Cavalry Plan was adjusted using the same exchange ratio.
All other terms of the Cavalry options were unchanged. There were 195,551 Pinnacle shares which
could be acquired by the participants in the Cavalry Plan at exercise prices that ranged between
$10.26 per share and $13.68 per share.
On November 30, 2007 and in connection with its merger with Mid-America, Pinnacle Financial
assumed several equity incentive plans, including the Mid-America Bancshares, Inc. 2006 Omnibus
Equity Incentive Plan (the Mid-America Plans). All options and stock appreciation rights granted
under the Mid-America Plans were fully vested prior to Pinnacle Financials merger with Mid-America
and expire at various dates between June 2011 and July 2017. In connection with the merger, all
options and stock appreciation rights to acquire Mid-America common stock were converted to options
or stock appreciation rights, as applicable, to acquire Pinnacle Financial common stock at the
0.4655 exchange ratio. The exercise price of the outstanding options and stock appreciation rights
under the Mid-America Plans were adjusted using the same exchange ratio with the exercise price
also being reduced by $1.50 per share. All other terms of the Mid-America options and stock
appreciation rights were unchanged. There were 487,835 Pinnacle shares which could be acquired by
the participants in the Mid-America Plan at exercise prices that ranged between $6.63 per share and
$21.37 per share. At June 30, 2008, there were 88,435 shares available for issue under the
Mid-America Plans.
Common Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights
As of June 30, 2008, of the approximately 2,366,000 stock options and 14,000 stock
appreciation rights outstanding, 1,345,587 options were granted with the intention to be incentive
stock options qualifying under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code for favorable tax treatment
to the option holder while 1,034,281 options would be deemed non-qualified stock options or stock
appreciation rights and thus not subject to favorable tax treatment to the option holder. All
stock options granted under the Pinnacle equity incentive plans vest in equal increments over five
years from the date of grant and are exercisable over a period of ten years from the date of grant.
All stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the Cavalry Plan and Mid-America
Plans were fully vested at the date of those mergers.
Page 17
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
A summary of the stock option and stock appreciation rights activity during the six months
ended June 30, 2008 and information regarding expected vesting, contractual terms remaining,
intrinsic values and other matters was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
(000s) |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
2,398,823 |
|
|
$ |
16.84 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
23,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
163,360 |
|
|
|
21.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised (2) |
|
|
(153,190 |
) |
|
|
7.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(29,125 |
) |
|
|
27.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
2,379,868 |
|
|
|
17.28 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
14,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding and expected to vest as
of June 30, 2008 |
|
|
2,340,014 |
|
|
|
17.11 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
14,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
1,636,615 |
|
|
|
12.27 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
13,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise
price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of Pinnacle Financial common stock of
$20.09 per common share for the approximately 1.3 million options and stock appreciation
rights that were in-the-money at June 30, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
There were 1,671 stock appreciation rights exercised during six months ended June 30,
2008 resulting in the issuance of 552 shares of Pinnacle Financial common stock. |
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, 184,628 option awards vested at an average exercise
price of $23.08 and an intrinsic value of approximately $3.4 million. On January 18, 2008,
Pinnacle Financial granted options to purchase 163,360 common shares to certain employees at an
exercise price of $21.51 per share. These options, which were issued as non-qualified stock
options, will vest in varying increments over five years beginning one year after the date of the
grant and are exercisable over a period of ten years from the date of grant. Pursuant to SAB 110,
Share-Based Payment, Pinnacle Financial will continue to use the simplified method for estimating
the expense of stock compensation during 2008.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic value of options and stock
appreciation rights exercised was $2.4 million determined as of the date of exercise. As of June
30, 2008, there was approximately $6.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
unvested stock options granted. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 2.9 years.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, Pinnacle Financial recorded stock-based
compensation expense of $1,016,000 and $923,000, respectively using the Black-Scholes valuation
model for awards granted prior to, but not yet vested, as of January 1, 2006 and for stock-based
awards granted after January 1, 2006. For these awards, Pinnacle Financial has recognized
compensation expense using a straight-line amortization method. Stock-based compensation expense
has been reduced for estimated forfeitures.
The fair value of options granted for each of the six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and
2007 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
3.20 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
Expected life of options |
|
6.50 years |
|
6.50 years |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
Weighted average fair value |
|
$ |
7.07 |
|
|
$ |
10.13 |
|
Pinnacle Financials computation of expected volatility is based on weekly historical
volatility since September 2002. Pinnacle Financial used the simplified method in determining the
estimated life of stock option issuances. The risk free interest rate of the
Page 18
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
award is based on the closing market bid for U.S. Treasury securities corresponding to the
expected life of the stock option issuances in effect at the time of grant.
Restricted Shares
Additionally, Pinnacle Financials 2004 Equity Incentive Plan and the Mid-America Plans
provide for the granting of restricted share awards and other performance or market-based awards.
There were no market-based awards outstanding as of June 30, 2008 under the 2004 Equity Incentive
Plan. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, Pinnacle Financial awarded 128,366 shares of
restricted common stock to Pinnacle Financial directors, officers and associates. The weighted
average fair value of these awards as of the date of grant was $22.07 per share. The forfeiture
restrictions on 82,870 of the restricted shares awarded to Pinnacle Financial associates lapse in
annual increments of 20% over the next five years. The forfeiture restrictions on 26,805
restricted shares awarded to members of Pinnacle Financials senior management lapse in three
separate traunches should Pinnacle Financial achieve certain earnings and soundness targets over
the subsequent three year period. Additionally, the forfeiture restrictions on 26,805 restricted
shares issued to members of Pinnacle Financials senior management lapse in annual increments of
10% over the next ten years if Pinnacle Financial is profitable in the prior year. The remaining
9,763 restricted shares were awarded to Pinnacle Financial directors with the restrictions on these
shares lapsing on the one year anniversary date of the award based on each individual board member
meeting their attendance goals for the various board and board committee meetings to which each
member was scheduled to attend during the period from March 1, 2008 through February 28, 2009.
Compensation expense associated with the performance based restricted share awards is
recognized over the time period that the restrictions associated with the awards lapse based on a
graded vesting schedule such that each traunche is amortized separately. Compensation expense
associated with the time based restricted share awards is recognized over the time period that the
restrictions associated with the awards lapse based on the total cost of the award. For the six
months ended June 30, 2008, Pinnacle Financial recognized approximately $43,000 in compensation
costs attributable to all restricted share awards issued prior to June 30, 2008. During the six
months ended June 30, 2008, $390,000 in previously expensed compensation associated with certain
traunches of restricted share awards was reversed when Pinnacle Financial determined that the
performance targets required to vest the awards were unlikely to be achieved.
A summary of activity for unvested restricted share awards for the six months ended June 30,
2008 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Unvested awards at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
54,349 |
|
New awards granted |
|
|
128,366 |
|
Awards whereby restrictions have lapsed and shares released
to participants |
|
|
(3,230 |
) |
Forfeited awards (i.e., restrictions not met by participants) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested awards at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
179,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Regulatory Matters
Pinnacle National is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to Pinnacle Financial
under federal banking laws and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Pinnacle Financial is also subject to limits on payment of dividends to its shareholders by the
rules, regulations and policies of federal banking authorities. Pinnacle Financial has not paid
any cash dividends since inception, and it does not anticipate that it will consider paying
dividends until Pinnacle Financial generates sufficient capital from operations to support both
anticipated asset growth and dividend payments. During the six months ended June 30, 2008,
Pinnacle National paid dividend payments of $2.7 million to Pinnacle Financial to fund Pinnacle
Financials interest payments due on its subordinated indebtedness. At June 30, 2008, pursuant to
federal banking regulations, Pinnacle National had approximately $56.1 million of net retained
profits from the previous two years available for future dividend payments to Pinnacle Financial.
Pinnacle Financial and its banking subsidiary are subject to various regulatory capital
requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements
can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions, by regulators that,
if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. Under capital
adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Pinnacle Financial
and its banking subsidiary must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures
of the assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as
Page 19
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Pinnacle Financials and its banking
subsidiary capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the
regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Pinnacle
Financial and its banking subsidiaries to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I
capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier I capital to average assets. Management believes, as of
June 30, 2008, that Pinnacle Financial and its banking subsidiary met all capital adequacy
requirements to which they are subject. To be categorized as well-capitalized, Pinnacle National
must maintain minimum Total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth
in the following table. Pinnacle Financial and its banking subsidiaries actual capital amounts and
ratios are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well-Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Under Prompt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Corrective |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Requirement |
|
|
Action Provisions |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
At June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk weighted assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial |
|
$ |
343,546 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
$ |
262,982 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
not applicable |
|
Pinnacle National |
|
$ |
339,721 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
$ |
262,669 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
328,337 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial |
|
$ |
311,757 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
$ |
131,491 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
not applicable |
|
Pinnacle National |
|
$ |
307,876 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
$ |
131,335 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
197,002 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Tier I capital to average assets (*): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial |
|
$ |
311,757 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
$ |
146,451 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
not applicable |
|
Pinnacle National |
|
$ |
307,876 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
$ |
146,471 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
183,088 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Average assets for the above calculations were based on the most recent quarter. |
Note 9. Derivative Instruments
Financial derivatives are reported at fair value in other assets or other liabilities. The
accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on whether it has been designated
and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship. For derivatives not designated as hedges, the
gain or loss is recognized in current earnings. Beginning in 2007, Pinnacle Financial entered into
interest rate swaps (swaps) to facilitate customer transactions and meet their financing needs.
Upon entering into these instruments to meet customer needs, Pinnacle Financial enters into
offsetting positions in order to minimize the risk to Pinnacle Financial. These swaps qualify as
derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments.
Interest rate swap contracts involve the risk of dealing with counterparties and their ability
to meet contractual terms. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is positive,
this generally indicates that the counter party or customer owes Pinnacle Financial, and results in
credit risk to Pinnacle Financial. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is
negative, Pinnacle Financial owes the customer or counterparty and therefore, has no credit risk.
A summary of Pinnacle Financials interest rate swaps as of June 30, 2008 is included in the
following table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
Interest rate swap agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed/receive variable swaps |
|
$ |
115,389 |
|
|
$ |
808 |
|
Pay variable/receive fixed swaps |
|
|
115,389 |
|
|
|
(865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
230,778 |
|
|
$ |
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 20
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 10. Business Segment Information
Pinnacle Financial has four reporting segments comprised of commercial banking, trust and
investment services, mortgage origination and insurance services. Pinnacle Financials primary
segment is commercial banking which consists of commercial loan and deposit services as well as the
activities of Pinnacle Nationals branch locations. Trust and investment services include trust
services offered by Pinnacle National and all brokerage and investment activities associated with
Pinnacle Asset Management, an operating unit within Pinnacle National. Mortgage origination is
also a separate unit within Pinnacle National and focuses on the origination of residential
mortgage loans for sale to investors in the secondary residential mortgage market. Insurance
Services reflect the activities of Pinnacle Nationals wholly owned subsidiary, Miller and Loughry
Insurance Services, Inc. Miller and Loughry is a general insurance agency located in Murfreesboro,
Tennessee and is licensed to sell various commercial and consumer insurance products.
The following tables present financial information for each reportable segment as of June 30,
2008 and 2007 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Origination |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Total Company |
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
27,641 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,682 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
2,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,787 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
5,839 |
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
9,058 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
21,114 |
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
23,075 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,576 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
2,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
7,003 |
|
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
$ |
656 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
7,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
17,661 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,661 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
2,851 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
5,552 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
12,558 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
14,484 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
2,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,955 |
|
|
$ |
186 |
|
|
$ |
186 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
5,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
54,926 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
55,041 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
4,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,378 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
10,726 |
|
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
1,720 |
|
|
|
1,653 |
|
|
|
17,426 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
43,823 |
|
|
|
2,593 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
48,567 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
4,682 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
5,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,769 |
|
|
$ |
446 |
|
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
451 |
|
|
$ |
14,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
34,743 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,743 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,688 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
5,498 |
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
10,577 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
23,955 |
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
27,608 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
4,433 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
4,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
10,165 |
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
11,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period assets |
|
$ |
4,084,383 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,507 |
|
|
$ |
5,165 |
|
|
$ |
4,106,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period assets |
|
$ |
2,306,150 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,973 |
|
|
$ |
4,204 |
|
|
$ |
2,315,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 21
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 11. Subsequent Events
On July 2, 2008, Pinnacle National acquired Murfreesboro, Tenn.-based Beach & Gentry Insurance
LLC (Beach & Gentry). Concurrently, Beach & Gentry merged with Miller & Loughry Insurance &
Services Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle National, also located in Murfreesboro.
On July 22, 2008, Pinnacle Financial issued one million shares of its authorized but unissued
common stock via a private placement to mutual funds and certain other institutional accounts
managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. at $21.50 per share. Proceeds from this sale of common
stock are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, including supporting the continued,
anticipated growth of Pinnacle National.
On August 5, 2008, Pinnacle National entered into a subordinated term loan agreement with a
regional bank for $15 million. The loan will bear interest at 90-day Libor plus 3.5%, mature in
seven years and borrowings under the loan will qualify as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital
purposes. Proceeds from this issuance of subordinated debt are expected to be used for the
anticipated growth of Pinnacle National.
Page 22
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following is a discussion of our financial condition at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 and
our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. The purpose
of this discussion is to focus on information about our financial condition and results of
operations which is not otherwise apparent from the consolidated financial statements. The
following discussion and analysis should be read along with our consolidated financial statements
and the related notes included elsewhere herein.
Overview
General. Our rapid organic growth together with our merger with Mid-America Bancshares, Inc.
(Mid-America), a two-bank holding company in Nashville, Tennessee, on November 30, 2007 and our
expansion in the Knoxville, Tennessee market has had a material impact on Pinnacle Financials
financial condition and results of operations in 2008 as compared to 2007. This rapid growth along
with the Mid-America merger and the Knoxville market expansion are discussed more fully below. Our
fully diluted net income per share for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $0.34 and
$0.33, respectively. Our fully diluted net income per share for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007 was $0.60 and $0.66, respectively. At June 30, 2008, loans totaled $3.032 billion, as
compared to $2.750 billion at December 31, 2007, while total deposits increased to $3.153 billion
at June 30, 2008 from $2.925 billion at December 31, 2007.
Acquisition Mid-America. On November 30, 2007, we consummated a merger with Mid-America.
Pursuant to the merger agreement, Mid-America shareholders received a fixed exchange ratio of
0.4655 shares of our common stock and $1.50 in cash for each share of Mid-America common stock, or
approximately 6.7 million Pinnacle Financial shares and $21.6 million in cash. We financed the
cash portion of the merger consideration with the proceeds of a $30 million trust preferred
securities offering by an affiliated trust. The accompanying consolidated financial statements
include the activities of the former Mid-America since November 30, 2007.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we incurred merger integration expense related
to the merger with Mid-America of $1.35 million and $4.46 million, respectively. These expenses
were directly related to the merger, and consisted primarily of severance costs and costs to
integrate processing systems and are reflected in the accompanying consolidated statement of income
as merger related expense.
Knoxville expansion. During April of 2007, we announced a de novo expansion of our firm to the
Knoxville MSA. At that time, we had hired several new associates from other financial institutions
in that market and had negotiated a lease agreement for our main office facility with future plans
to construct four additional offices over the next few years. In June of 2007, we opened our first
full service branch facility in Knoxville. At June 30, 2008, our Knoxville facility had recorded
$207.2 million in loan balances and $142.5 million in deposit balances. At June 30, 2008, we
employed 27 associates in the Knoxville MSA.
Results of Operations. Our net interest income increased to $27.7 million for the second quarter
of 2008 compared to $17.7 million for the second quarter of 2007. The net interest margin (the
ratio of net interest income to average earning assets) for the three months ended June 30, 2008
was 3.24% compared to 3.58% for the same period in 2007. Our net interest income increased to
$55.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $34.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2007. The net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 3.27%
compared to 3.61% for the same period in 2007.
Our provision for loan losses was $2.8 million for the second quarter of 2008 compared to $900,000
for the same period in 2007. The provision for loan losses was $4.4 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to $1.7 million for the same period in 2007. Impacting the provision
for loan losses in any accounting period are several matters including the amount of loan growth
during the period, the level of charge-offs or recoveries incurred during the period, the results
of our quarterly assessment of the inherent risks of our loan portfolio and the impact of the
assessment on the level of the allowance for loan losses.
Noninterest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in
2007 increased by $3.5 million, or 63.2% and $6.8 million or 64.8%, respectively. This increase is
largely attributable to the fee businesses associated with the Mid-America acquisition,
particularly with regard to service charges on deposit accounts, investment services commissions,
gains on the sale of branch premises and other noninterest income. We also recorded during the
first six months of 2008 approximately $450,000 in insurance commissions received from one of our
carriers due to favorable claims experience by that carrier.
Page 23
Our continued growth in 2008 resulted in increased noninterest expense compared to 2007 due to the
addition of Mid-America and our expansion into the Knoxville MSA, increases in salaries and
employee benefits, equipment and occupancy expenses and other operating expenses. The number of
full-time equivalent employees increased from 441.0 at June 30, 2007 to 704.5 at June 30, 2008. As
a result, we experienced increases in compensation and employee benefit expense. In addition to
incurring a full year of the Mid-America-related expense in 2008, we expect to add additional
employees throughout 2008 which will also cause our compensation and employee benefit expense to
increase in 2008 when compared to the comparable period in 2007. Additionally, our branch
expansion efforts during the last few years and the addition of the eleven Mid-America branches
will also increase noninterest expense. The increased operational expenses for the recently opened
branches will continue to result in increased noninterest expense in future periods. Our
efficiency ratio (the ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net interest income and
noninterest income) was 62.8% for the second quarter of 2008 compared to 62.4% for the same period
in 2007. Our efficiency ratio was 67.0% for the first six months of 2008 compared with 60.9% for
the same period in 2007. These calculations include the impact of approximately $1.3 million and
$4.5 million in Mid-America merger related charges incurred during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, respectively.
The effective income tax expense rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was
approximately 26.8% and 28.2%, respectively, compared to an effective income tax expense rate for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 of approximately 30.7% and 31.2%, respectively. The
decrease in the effective rate for 2008 compared to 2007 was due to increased investments in bank
qualified municipal securities and bank owned life insurance as well as an increase in the state
tax benefit.
Net income for the second quarter of 2008 was $8.0 million compared to $5.4 million for the same
period in 2007, an increase of 46.7%. Net income for the first six months of 2008 was $14.0
million compared to $11.0 million for the same period in 2007, an increase of 27.1%.
Financial Condition. Loans increased $282.6 million during the first six months of 2008. As we
seek to increase our loan portfolio, we must also continue to monitor the risks inherent in our
lending operations. If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover the estimated loan
losses in our loan portfolio, increases to the allowance for loan losses would be required which
would decrease our earnings.
We have grown our total deposits to $3.153 billion at June 30, 2008 compared to $2.925 billion at
December 31, 2007, an increase of $227.2 million. In comparing the composition of the average
balances of our deposits between the first six months of 2008 with the first six months of 2007, we
have experienced increased growth in our higher cost certificate of deposit balances than in any
other category. This increase in reliance on higher cost deposits has contributed to a reduced net
interest margin between the two periods.
Capital and Liquidity. At June 30, 2008, our capital ratios, including our banks capital ratios,
met regulatory minimum capital requirements. Additionally, at June 30, 2008, our bank would be
considered to be well-capitalized pursuant to banking regulations. As our bank grows it will
require additional capital from us over that which can be earned through operations. We anticipate
that we will continue to use various capital raising techniques in order to support the growth of
our bank.
In the past, we have been successful in procuring additional capital from the capital markets via
public and private offerings of trust preferred securities and common stock. On July 22, 2008,
Pinnacle Financial received $21.5 million in proceeds from the sale of one million shares of its
authorized but unissued common stock via a private placement to mutual funds and certain other
institutional accounts managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. at $21.50 per share. Proceeds
from this sale of common stock are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, including
supporting the continued, anticipated growth of Pinnacle National. On August 5, 2008, Pinnacle
National also entered into a $15 million subordinated term loan with a regional bank. The loan
will bear interest at three month Libor plus 3.5%, mature in seven years and will qualify as Tier 2
capital for regulatory capital purposes. This additional capital was required to support our
growth. We believe the $21.5 million we have received in connection with the aforementioned
private placement and the $15 million we received in connection with the subordinated term loan
should provide us adequate capital to support our current growth plans for the next two to three
years. However, currently unanticipated events, such as our growth exceeding our current growth
plans, our acquisition of other banks, our expansion into a new geographic market, or significant
loan losses, could require additional capital, including issuance of additional common shares.
Page 24
Critical Accounting Estimates
The accounting principles we follow and our methods of applying these principles conform with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles and with general practices within the banking industry.
In connection with the application of those principles, we have made judgments and estimates which,
in the case of the determination of our allowance for loan losses and the assessment of impairment
of the intangibles resulting from the Mid-America and Cavalry mergers have been critical to the
determination of our financial position and results of operations.
Allowance for Loan Losses (allowance). Our management assesses the adequacy of the allowance
prior to the end of each calendar quarter. This assessment includes procedures to estimate the
allowance and test the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting balance. The level of the
allowance is based upon managements evaluation of the loan portfolios, past loan loss experience,
known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers
ability to repay (including the timing of future payment), the estimated value of any underlying
collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, economic conditions, industry and peer bank loan
quality indications and other pertinent factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it
requires material estimates including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be
received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to significant change. Loan losses are charged
off when management believes that the full collectability of the loan is unlikely. A loan may be
partially charged-off after a confirming event has occurred which serves to validate that full
repayment pursuant to the terms of the loan is unlikely. Allocation of the allowance may be made
for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in managements
judgment, is deemed to be uncollectible.
Larger balance commercial and commercial real estate loans are impaired when, based on current
information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according
to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Collection of all amounts due according to the
contractual terms means that both the interest and principal payments of a loan will be collected
as scheduled in the loan agreement.
An impairment allowance is recognized if the present value of expected future cash flows from the
loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (recorded investment in the loan is the
principal balance plus any accrued interest, net of deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized
premium or discount, and does not reflect any direct write-down of the investment). The impairment
is recognized through the allowance. Loans that are impaired are recorded at the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or if the loan is
collateral dependent, impairment measurement is based on the fair value of the collateral, less
estimated disposal costs. Income is recognized on impaired loans on a cash basis.
The level of allowance maintained is believed by management to be adequate to absorb probable
losses in the portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is increased by provisions
charged to expense and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries of amounts previously
charged-off.
In assessing the adequacy of the allowance, we also consider the results of our ongoing independent
loan review process. We undertake this process both to ascertain whether there are loans in the
portfolio whose credit quality has weakened over time and to assist in our overall evaluation of
the risk characteristics of the entire loan portfolio. Our loan review process includes the
judgment of management, the input from our independent loan reviewer, and reviews that may have
been conducted by bank regulatory agencies as part of their usual examination process. We
incorporate loan review results in the determination of whether or not it is probable that we will
be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of a loan.
As part of managements quarterly assessment of the allowance, management divides the loan
portfolio into four segments: commercial, commercial real estate, consumer and consumer real
estate. Each segment is then analyzed such that an allocation of the allowance is estimated for
each loan segment.
The allowance allocation for commercial and commercial real estate loans begins with a process of
estimating the probable losses inherent for these types of loans. The estimates for these loans
are established by category and based on our internal system of credit risk ratings and historical
loss data for industry and various peer bank groups. The estimated loan loss allocation rate for
our internal system of credit risk grades for commercial and commercial real estate loans is based
on managements experience with similarly graded loans, discussions with banking regulators and our
internal loan review processes. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we also performed a
migration analysis of all loans that were charged-off during the previous two years. A migration
analysis assists in evaluating loan loss allocation rates for the various risk grades assigned to
loans in our portfolio. We utilized the migration analysis to some extent to determine the loss
allocation rates for the commercial and commercial real estate
Page 25
portfolios. Subsequently, we weighted the allocation methodologies for the commercial and
commercial real estate portfolios and determine a weighted average allocation for these portfolios.
The allowance allocation for consumer and consumer real estate loans which includes installment,
home equity, consumer mortgages, automobiles and others is established for each of the categories
by estimating probable losses inherent in that particular category of consumer and consumer real
estate loans. The estimated loan loss allocation rate for each category is based on managements
experience. Additionally, consumer and consumer real estate loans are analyzed based on our actual
loss rates, industry loss rates and loss rates of various peer bank groups. Consumer and consumer
real estate loans are evaluated as a group by category (i.e. retail real estate, installment, etc.)
rather than on an individual loan basis because these loans are smaller and homogeneous. We weight
the allocation methodologies for the consumer and consumer real estate portfolios and determine a
weighted average allocation for these portfolios.
The estimated loan loss allocation for all four loan portfolio segments is then adjusted for
managements estimate of probable losses for several environmental factors. The allocation for
environmental factors is particularly subjective and does not lend itself to exact mathematical
calculation. This amount represents estimated inherent credit losses which may exist, but have not
yet been identified, as of the balance sheet date based upon quarterly trend assessments in
delinquent and nonaccrual loans, unanticipated charge-offs, credit concentration changes,
prevailing economic conditions, changes in lending personnel experience, changes in lending
policies or procedures and other influencing factors. These environmental factors are considered
for each of the four loan segments and the allowance allocation, as determined by the processes
noted above for each segment, is increased or decreased based on the incremental assessment of
these various environmental factors.
We then test the resulting allowance balance by comparing the balance in the allowance to
historical trends and industry and peer information. Our management then evaluates the result of
the procedures performed, including the result of our testing, and concludes on the appropriateness
of the balance of the allowance in its entirety. The audit committee of our board of directors
reviews and approves the assessment prior to the filing of quarterly and annual financial
information.
Impairment of Intangible Assets We recorded the assets and liabilities of Mid-America as of
November 30, 2007 and Cavalry as of March 15, 2006, at estimated fair value. We engaged a third
party to assist us in valuing certain financial assets and liabilities.
Long-lived assets, including purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, such as our core
deposit intangible asset, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to
be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated
undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an
asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by
which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed
of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying
amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated.
Goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are tested annually for
impairment, and are tested for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that
the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying
amount exceeds the assets fair value. We reviewed our goodwill assets as of June 30, 2008, and
concluded that no indications of impairment were present. Our annual assessment date is September
30. Should we determine in a future period that the goodwill recorded in connection with our
acquisitions has been impaired, then a charge to our earnings will be recorded in the period such
determination is made.
Page 26
Results of Operations
Our results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were highlighted by the
continued growth in loans and other earning assets and deposits, primarily as a result of the
Mid-America acquisition and the Knoxville expansion, which resulted in increased revenues and
expenses. The following is a summary of our results of operations (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
2008-2007 |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
2008-2007 |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
48,774 |
|
|
$ |
35,508 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
% |
|
$ |
100,935 |
|
|
$ |
69,247 |
|
|
|
45.8 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
21,092 |
|
|
|
17,847 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
45,894 |
|
|
|
34,504 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
27,682 |
|
|
|
17,661 |
|
|
|
56.7 |
% |
|
|
55,041 |
|
|
|
34,743 |
|
|
|
58.4 |
% |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
2,787 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
209.7 |
% |
|
|
4,378 |
|
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
159.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
24,895 |
|
|
|
16,761 |
|
|
|
48.5 |
% |
|
|
50,663 |
|
|
|
33,055 |
|
|
|
53.3 |
% |
Noninterest income |
|
|
9,058 |
|
|
|
5,551 |
|
|
|
63.2 |
% |
|
|
17,426 |
|
|
|
10,578 |
|
|
|
64.7 |
% |
Noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger related expense |
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
21,726 |
|
|
|
14,484 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
44,112 |
|
|
|
27,608 |
|
|
|
59.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before income taxes |
|
|
10,878 |
|
|
|
7,828 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
19,522 |
|
|
|
16,025 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,917 |
|
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
% |
|
|
5,496 |
|
|
|
4,997 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
7,961 |
|
|
$ |
5,426 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
% |
|
$ |
14,026 |
|
|
$ |
11,028 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 included merger related expense
of approximately $1.3 million and $4.5 million respectively. Excluding merger related expense from
our net income resulted in diluted net income per common share for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 of $0.37 and $0.71, respectively. A comparison of these amounts to our results for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial
measure follows (dollars in thousands):
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP financial measures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
7,961 |
|
|
$ |
5,426 |
|
|
$ |
14,026 |
|
|
$ |
11,028 |
|
Merger related expense, net of tax |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income excluding merger related expense |
|
$ |
8,781 |
|
|
$ |
5,426 |
|
|
$ |
16,733 |
|
|
$ |
11,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully-diluted net income per common share, as reported |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully-diluted net income per common share, excluding
merger related expense |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The presentation of this non-GAAP financial information is not intended to be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for any measure prepared in accordance with GAAP. Because non-GAAP
financial measures presented are not measurements determined in accordance with GAAP and are
susceptible to varying calculations, these non-GAAP financial measures, as presented, may not be
comparable to other similarly titled measures presented by other companies.
Pinnacle Financial believes excluding the impact of merger related expense facilitates making
period-to-period comparisons, is a meaningful indication of our operating performance, and provides
investors with additional information to evaluate our past financial results and ongoing
operational performance.
Pinnacle Financials management and board utilize this non-GAAP financial information to compare
our operating performance between accounting periods and have utilized non-GAAP diluted earnings
per share (excluding the merger related expense) in establishing the performance targets of our
2008 Annual Cash Incentive Plan and in our restricted stock award agreements.
Page 27
Net Interest Income. Net interest income represents the amount by which interest earned on various
earning assets exceeds interest paid on deposits and other interest bearing liabilities and is the
most significant component of our earnings. For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we
recorded net interest income of $27.7 million and $17.7 million respectively, which resulted in a
net interest margin of 3.24% and 3.58%. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we
recorded net interest income of $55.0 million and $34.7 million respectively, which resulted in a
net interest margin of 3.27% and 3.61%.
Page 28
The following table sets forth the amount of our average balances, interest income or interest
expense for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the
average interest rate for total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities, net
interest spread and net interest margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates/ |
|
|
|
Balances |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yields |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yields |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
2,941,973 |
|
|
$ |
42,228 |
|
|
|
5.77 |
% |
|
$ |
1,598,967 |
|
|
$ |
30,556 |
|
|
|
7.66 |
% |
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
380,733 |
|
|
|
4,792 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
% |
|
|
272,024 |
|
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Tax-exempt (1) |
|
|
136,216 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
4.22 |
% |
|
|
75,057 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
% |
Federal funds sold and other |
|
|
41,931 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
% |
|
|
58,836 |
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
3,500,853 |
|
|
|
48,744 |
|
|
|
5.66 |
% |
|
|
2,004,884 |
|
|
|
35,508 |
|
|
|
7.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonearning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
259,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other nonearning assets |
|
|
153,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,913,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,229,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking |
|
$ |
379,714 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
1.42 |
% |
|
|
254,171 |
|
|
|
2,147 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
% |
Savings and money market |
|
|
702,933 |
|
|
|
2,722 |
|
|
|
1.56 |
% |
|
|
501,373 |
|
|
|
4,239 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
1,466,685 |
|
|
|
13,658 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
646,251 |
|
|
|
8,071 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing deposits |
|
|
2,549,332 |
|
|
|
17,719 |
|
|
|
2.80 |
% |
|
|
1,401,795 |
|
|
|
14,457 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
% |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
174,847 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
|
172,872 |
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
% |
Federal Home
Loan Bank advances and other borrowings |
|
|
208,773 |
|
|
|
1,687 |
|
|
|
3.20 |
% |
|
|
47,998 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
5.19 |
% |
Subordinated debt |
|
|
82,476 |
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
% |
|
|
51,548 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
3,015,428 |
|
|
|
21,092 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
% |
|
|
1,674,213 |
|
|
|
17,847 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
% |
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
398,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits and interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
3,413,765 |
|
|
|
21,092 |
|
|
|
2.48 |
% |
|
|
1,950,454 |
|
|
|
17,847 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
22,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
477,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,913,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,229,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.88 |
% |
Net interest margin (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.58 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Yields computed on tax-exempt instruments on a tax equivalent basis. |
|
(2) |
|
Yields realized on interest-earning assets less the rates paid on
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest margin is the result of annualized net interest income calculated on
a tax-equivalent basis divided by average interest-earning assets for the period. |
Page 29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates/ |
|
|
|
Balances |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yields |
|
|
Balances |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yields |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
2,851,859 |
|
|
$ |
87,620 |
|
|
|
6.18 |
% |
|
$ |
1,564,869 |
|
|
$ |
59,533 |
|
|
|
7.67 |
% |
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
373,929 |
|
|
|
9,430 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
% |
|
|
272,346 |
|
|
|
6,740 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
% |
Tax-exempt (1) |
|
|
136,453 |
|
|
|
2,691 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
% |
|
|
74,009 |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
% |
Federal funds sold and other |
|
|
50,412 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
% |
|
|
57,367 |
|
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
5.66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
3,412,653 |
|
|
|
100,935 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
|
1,968,591 |
|
|
|
69,247 |
|
|
|
7.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonearning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
259,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other nonearning assets |
|
|
172,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,843,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,189,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking |
|
$ |
392,011 |
|
|
|
3,468 |
|
|
|
1.78 |
% |
|
|
249,425 |
|
|
|
4,104 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
% |
Savings and money market |
|
|
719,416 |
|
|
|
6,820 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
|
498,625 |
|
|
|
8,364 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
1,419,792 |
|
|
|
28,517 |
|
|
|
4.04 |
% |
|
|
635,172 |
|
|
|
15,526 |
|
|
|
4.93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing deposits |
|
|
2,531,219 |
|
|
|
38,805 |
|
|
|
3.08 |
% |
|
|
1,383,222 |
|
|
|
27,994 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
% |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
171,997 |
|
|
|
1,399 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
% |
|
|
165,026 |
|
|
|
3,603 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
% |
Federal Home
Loan Bank advances and other borrowings |
|
|
176,287 |
|
|
|
3,112 |
|
|
|
3.49 |
% |
|
|
44,120 |
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
% |
Subordinated debt |
|
|
82,476 |
|
|
|
2,578 |
|
|
|
6.28 |
% |
|
|
51,548 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
6.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
2,961,979 |
|
|
|
45,894 |
|
|
|
3.12 |
% |
|
|
1,643,916 |
|
|
|
34,504 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
383,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits and interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
3,345,354 |
|
|
|
45,894 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
% |
|
|
1,916,968 |
|
|
|
34,504 |
|
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
22,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
475,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,843,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,189,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
55,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
Net interest margin (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Yields computed on tax-exempt instruments on a tax equivalent basis. |
|
(2) |
|
Yields realized on interest-earning assets less the rates paid on interest-bearing
liabilities. |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest margin is the result of annualized net interest income calculated on a
tax-equivalent basis divided by average interest-earning assets for the period. |
Page 30
As noted above, the net interest margin for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008 was 3.24% and 3.27% respectively, compared to a net interest margin of 3.58% and 3.61% for the
same periods in 2007. Our net interest margin decreased by 0.34% when comparing the three months
ended June 30, 2008 to the three months ended June 30, 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008
to the six months ended June 30, 2007. This decline was the result of our earning asset yields for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 decreasing by 1.49% and 1.16%, respectively, from the
earning asset yields for the comparable periods in the previous year. Additionally, our funding
costs were only 1.19% less between the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and 0.87% less
between the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Also impacting our net interest margin
comparisons between the two periods was our acquisition of Mid-America, which had a higher
percentage of noncore deposits and a higher funding cost than we did at the time of the merger.
Other matters related to our net interest income, net interest yields and rates, and net interest
margin are presented below:
|
|
|
Our loan yields were 1.89% and 1.49% less during the three and six months ended June 30,
2008 than during the same period in 2007. A significant amount of our loan portfolio has
variable rate pricing with a large portion of these loans tied to our prime lending rate.
Our weighted average prime rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was 5.08%
and 5.66% respectively, compared to 8.25% for the same periods in 2007 reflecting the
reduction of the Federal Funds rate between these periods. Our prime lending rate moves in
concert with the Federal Reserves changes to its Federal funds rate. |
|
|
|
|
We have been able to grow our funding base significantly. For asset/liability
management purposes in 2008 and 2007, we elected to allocate a greater proportion of such
funds to our loan portfolio versus our securities and shorter-term investment portfolio.
For the first six months of 2008, average loan balances were 74.2% of total assets compared
to 71.5% in 2007. Loans generally have higher yields than do securities and other
shorter-term investments. This change in allocation contributed to the increase in the
overall total interest earning asset yields between the two periods. |
|
|
|
|
During 2008, overall deposit rates were less than those rates for the
comparable period in 2007. Changes in interest rates paid on such products as interest
checking, savings and money market accounts, securities sold under agreements to repurchase
and Federal funds purchased will generally increase or decrease in a manner that is
consistent with changes in the short-term rate environment. There was a significant
decrease in the short term rate environment during the first six months of 2008 when
compared with the first six months of 2007. As a result, the rates for those products
experienced a large decrease between the two periods. However, competitive deposit pricing
pressures in our market limited our ability to reduce our funding costs more aggressively
and negatively impacted our net interest margin. We routinely monitor the pricing of
deposit products by our primary competitors. We believe that our markets are very
competitive banking markets with several new market entrants seeking deposit growth. As a
result, even though the short-term rate environment may allow for rate decreases in our
short-term funding base, these decreases will be limited by competitive pressures. |
|
|
|
|
During the first six months of 2008, the average balances of noninterest bearing deposit
balances, interest bearing transaction accounts, savings and money market accounts and
securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to 49.8% of our total funding
compared to 61.9% during the same period in 2007. These funding sources generally have
lower rates than do other funding sources, such as certificates of deposit and other
borrowings. Additionally, noninterest bearing deposits comprised only 11.5% of total
funding in 2008, compared to 14.2% in 2007. Maintaining our noninterest bearing deposit
balances in relation to total funding is critical to maintaining and growing our net
interest margin and receives a great deal of emphasis by management. Thus, the mix of our
deposit base in 2008 was weighted more toward higher cost time deposits and other wholesale
funding sources, which also contributed to our lower net interest margin in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Also impacting the net interest margin during the first six months of 2008 was increased
floating rate subordinated indebtedness. The interest rate charged on this indebtedness is
generally higher than other funding sources. In October 2007, we issued an additional $30
million in floating rate subordinated indebtedness to fund the cash component of the
Mid-America purchase price. The rate we are required to pay on this indebtedness is 285
points over three-month LIBOR. This spread is higher than the spread associated with our
other forms of subordinated indebtedness which were issued in previous periods. |
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the yield curve steepened which is advantageous for most
banks, including us, as we use a significant amount of short-term funding to fund our balance sheet
growth. This short-term funding comes in the form of checking accounts, savings accounts, money
market accounts, short-term time deposits and securities sold under agreements to
Page 31
repurchase. Rates paid on these short-term deposits generally correlate to the Federal funds rate
and short term treasury rates. During most of 2007, the Federal funds rate was higher than other
longer term treasuries (i.e., an inverted yield curve). As a result, for most of 2007 depositors
tended to maintain their funds in shorter-term deposit accounts where they could achieve a higher
yield on their deposit balances and did not concern themselves with long-term products because
there was not enough yield for them to justify the longer maturity. In a more traditional rate
environment, depositors typically would either accept a lesser rate for more liquid deposit
accounts or choose a higher rate for a longer time deposit.
On April 30, 2008, the Federal Reserve reduced the targeted Federal funds rate such that the
targeted rate is now 2%. This reduction together with previous Federal Reserve rate reductions in
2008 has facilitated the continual compression of our net interest margins as we experience reduced
yields on a significant portion of our earning asset base and have not be able to counter this
impact via reduced funding costs quickly. Generally, we should be able to reduce our funding costs
over an extended period of time following a Federal Reserve rate reduction. Traditionally, we
maintain an asset sensitive balance sheet, thus when rates are stable to increasing our net
interest margins should expand.
We believe we should be able to increase net interest income through overall growth in earning
assets in 2008 compared to previous periods. The additional revenues provided by increased loan
volumes should be sufficient to overcome any immediate increases in funding costs, and thus we
should be able to increase our current net interest income. Our net interest margins will likely
decrease throughout the remainder of 2008 due to increasingly competitive deposit pricing in our
markets and further near-term rate reductions by the Federal Reserve. In the last few months of
2007 and first few months of 2008, the Federal Reserve reduced short-term rates dramatically. We
have taken steps to counter the impact of these rate decreases on our floating rate assets
(including prime rate loans) by reducing deposit rates to an appropriate level where we believe we
can sustain our funding base. We believe it will take more time for our competition in our market
to begin to price in the full impact of these rate decreases, and for competitive reasons, we will
not be able to counter the full impact of these rate decreases on our net interest margin in 2008.
As a result, our net interest margins in 2008 are lower than in 2007.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses represents a charge to earnings necessary
to establish an allowance for loan losses that, in our managements evaluation, should be adequate
to provide coverage for the inherent losses on outstanding loans. The provision for loan losses
amounted to $2.8 million and $900,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively and $4.4 million and $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Based upon our managements evaluation of the loan portfolio, we believe the allowance for loan
losses to be adequate to absorb our estimate of probable losses existing in the loan portfolio at
June 30, 2008. Between the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the provision
for loan losses increased by $1.9 million and $2.7 million, respectively. A significant increase
in loan growth, nonperforming loans and increased net-charge offs during the first six months of
2008 were the primary reasons for the increase in the provision expense in 2008 when compared to
2007.
Based upon managements assessment of the loan portfolio, we adjust our allowance for loan losses
to an amount deemed appropriate to adequately cover probable losses in the loan portfolio. While
our policies and procedures used to estimate the allowance for loan losses, as well as the
resultant provision for loan losses charged to operations, are considered adequate by our
management and are reviewed from time to time by our regulators, they are necessarily approximate
and imprecise. There are factors beyond our control, such as conditions in the local and national
economy, the local real estate market or particular industry conditions which may negatively
impact, materially, our asset quality and the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses and, thus,
the resulting provision for loan losses.
Noninterest Income. Our noninterest income is composed of several components, some of which vary
significantly between quarterly periods. Service charges on deposit accounts and other noninterest
income generally reflect our growth, while investment services and fees from the origination of
mortgage loans will often reflect market conditions and fluctuate from period to period. The
opportunities for recognition of gains on loans and loan participations sold, gains on the sale of
premises and equipment, gains on sales of investment securities may also vary widely from quarter
to quarter and year to year.
Page 32
The following is the makeup of our noninterest income for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
2008-2007 |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
2008-2007 |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
2,684 |
|
|
$ |
1,920 |
|
|
|
39.8 |
% |
|
$ |
5,258 |
|
|
$ |
3,717 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
% |
Investment sales commissions |
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
% |
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
57.0 |
% |
Gains on sales of loans and loan participations, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees from the origination and sale of mortgage
loans, net of sales commissions |
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
84.7 |
% |
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
92.9 |
% |
Gains on loan participations sold, net |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
(95.2 |
%) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
(94.3 |
%) |
Insurance sales commissions |
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
(6.4 |
%) |
|
|
1,653 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
% |
Net gain on sale of premises |
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
1,705 |
% |
Trust fees |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
Other noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATM and other consumer fees |
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
55.1 |
% |
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
51.6 |
% |
Letters of credit fees |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
% |
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
131.6 |
% |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
147.2 |
% |
Equity in earnings of Collateral Plus, LLC |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
(71.8 |
%) |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
(48.3 |
%) |
Swap fees on customer loan transactions, net |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Visa related gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Other noninterest income |
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
150.3 |
% |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
188.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
9,058 |
|
|
$ |
5,551 |
|
|
|
63.2 |
% |
|
$ |
17,426 |
|
|
$ |
10,578 |
|
|
|
64.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charge income for 2008 increased over that of 2007 due to the Mid-America acquisition,
an increased number of customers utilizing overdraft protection lines and an increased per item
insufficient fund charge. Additionally, we increased the number of deposit accounts subject to
service charges. Also, the increase in service charges in 2008 when compared to 2007 was impacted
by a decreased earnings credit rate provided by Pinnacle National to its commercial deposit
customers.
Also included in noninterest income are commissions and fees from our financial advisory unit,
Pinnacle Asset Management, a division of Pinnacle National. Our Mid-America acquisition had a
significant impact on our investment services fees, as a significant amount of Mid-Americas fee
business was attributable to wealth management, particularly brokerage services. At June 30, 2008,
Pinnacle Asset Management was receiving commissions and fees in connection with approximately $826
million in brokerage assets held with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. compared to $643
million at June 30, 2007. We also offer trust services through Pinnacle Nationals trust division.
At June 30, 2008, our trust department was receiving fees on approximately $527 million in assets
compared to $436 million at June 30, 2007. We offer insurance services through Miller and Loughry
Insurance and Services, Inc. which we believe will continue to increase our noninterest income in
future periods. During the first three months of 2008, Miller and Loughry received approximately
$450,000 in fees from one of its insurance carriers due to favorable claims experience by that
carrier. We do not anticipate any additional similar fees from this insurance carrier this year.
On July 2, 2008, we announced the acquisition of Murfreesboro, Tenn. based Beach & Gentry Insurance
LLC (Beach & Gentry). Beach & Gentry merged with Miller & Loughry Insurance and Services Inc. The
combined company took the name Miller Loughry Beach and will consolidate offices following
renovations to Pinnacles offices in Murfreesboro. We anticipate that this merger will result in
an increase to our insurance sales commissions for the remainder of 2008.
Additionally, mortgage related fees contributed to the increase in noninterest income between 2008
and 2007. These mortgage fees are for loans originated in our market area that are subsequently
sold to third-party nationally-recognized investors. These loans are marketed to potential
investors prior to closing the loan with the borrower such that there is an agreement for the
subsequent sale of the loan between the eventual investor and Pinnacle National prior to the loan
being closed with the borrower. Pinnacle National sells loans to investors on a loan-by-loan basis
and has not entered into any forward commitments with investors for future loan sales. All of
these loan sales transfer servicing rights to the buyer. Generally, mortgage origination fees
increase in lower interest rate environments and decrease in rising interest rate environments.
Mortgage origination fees are also impacted by the strength of the housing market in our market
areas. As a result, mortgage origination fees may fluctuate greatly in response to a changing rate
Page 33
environment or changes to the housing market. Also impacting mortgage origination fees are the
number of mortgage originators we have offering these products. These originators are largely
commission-based employees. We have steadily increased the number of originators working for us
over the years and plan to continue to increase our mortgage origination work force in 2008.
We also sell certain commercial loan participations to our correspondent banks. Such sales are
primarily related to new lending transactions in excess of internal loan limits or industry
concentration limits. At June 30, 2008 and pursuant to participation agreements with these
correspondents, we had participated approximately $125 million of originated loans to these other
banks. These participation agreements have various provisions regarding collateral position,
pricing and other matters. Many of these agreements provide that we pay the correspondent less
than the loans contracted interest rate. Pursuant to SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities a replacement of FASB Statement
No. 125, in those transactions whereby the correspondent is receiving a lesser amount of interest
than the amount owed by the customer, we record a net gain along with a corresponding asset
representing the present value of our net retained cash flows. The resulting asset is amortized
over the term of the loan. Conversely, should a loan be paid prior to maturity, any remaining
unamortized asset is charged as a reduction to gains on loan participations sold. We recorded
gains, net of amortization expense related to the aforementioned retained cash flow asset, of
$8,000 and $167,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $12,000
and $212,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 related to the loan participation
transactions. We intend to maintain relationships with our correspondents in order to sell
participations in future loans to these or other correspondents primarily due to limitations on
loans to a single borrower or industry concentrations. In any event, the timing of participations
may cause the level of gains, if any, to vary significantly.
During the second quarter of 2008 and as a result of our merger with Mid-America, we sold two
branch locations for a net gain of $1.0 million. These branch divestures were related to
facilities only and did not include any financial assets or deposit accounts.
Also included in other noninterest income is $318,000 and $501,000 for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, respectively, in fees we receive when we originate an interest rate swap
transaction between an individual commercial borrower and a third party provider. This amount will
fluctuate significantly based on both borrower demand for this product and the interest rate
environment. During the first half of 2008, we recorded $140,000 in gains from the redemption of
Visa stock. We also increased the value of our bank-owned life insurance by $175,000 between the
second quarter of 2008 when compared to the second quarter of 2007 and $399,000 between the first
half of 2008 when compared to the first half of 2007. This was due primarily to the purchase of
$18 million in new bank owned life insurance policies during the fourth quarter of 2007.
Included in other noninterest income are miscellaneous consumer fees, such as ATM revenues,
merchant card and other electronic banking revenues. We experienced a significant increase in
these revenues in 2008 compared to 2007 due primarily to the merger with Mid-America and increased
volumes from new customers.
Page 34
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense consists of compensation and employee benefits, equipment
and occupancy expenses, and other operating expenses. The following is the makeup of our
noninterest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
2008-2007 |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
2008-2007 |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
7,496 |
|
|
$ |
5,758 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
% |
|
$ |
16,222 |
|
|
$ |
11,173 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
% |
Commissions |
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
55.3 |
% |
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
% |
Other compensation, primarily incentives |
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
80.1 |
% |
|
|
4,129 |
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
84.7 |
% |
Employee benefits and other |
|
|
2,366 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
% |
|
|
4,760 |
|
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
66.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation and employee benefits |
|
|
12,502 |
|
|
|
8,795 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
% |
|
|
26,369 |
|
|
|
17,061 |
|
|
|
54.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and occupancy |
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
72.2 |
% |
|
|
7,503 |
|
|
|
4,577 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
% |
Marketing and business development |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
% |
Postage and supplies |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
60.9 |
% |
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
52.3 |
% |
Amortization of core deposit intangible |
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
46.9 |
% |
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
47.7 |
% |
Other noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
101.6 |
% |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
175.4 |
% |
Professional fees |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
(3.8 |
%) |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
(36.8 |
%) |
Legal, including borrower-related charges |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
70.0 |
% |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
39.5 |
% |
Directors fees |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
173.7 |
% |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
104.3 |
% |
Insurance, including FDIC assessments |
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
151.9 |
% |
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
153.9 |
% |
Contributions |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
96.9 |
% |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
57.9 |
% |
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
2,153 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
163.5 |
% |
|
|
3,424 |
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
136.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other noninterest expense |
|
|
3,917 |
|
|
|
1,806 |
|
|
|
116.9 |
% |
|
|
6,370 |
|
|
|
3,277 |
|
|
|
94.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger related expense |
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
23,075 |
|
|
$ |
14,484 |
|
|
|
59.3 |
% |
|
$ |
48,567 |
|
|
$ |
27,608 |
|
|
|
75.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses have generally increased between the above periods due to our merger with
Mid-America, personnel additions occurring throughout each period, the continued development of our
branch network, including our Knoxville expansion, and other expenses which increase in relation to
our growth rate. We anticipate continued increases in our expenses in the future for such items as
additional personnel, the opening of additional branches and other expenses which tend to increase
in relation to our growth. Additionally, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
approximately $534,000 and $456,000, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007, approximately $1.0 million and $923,000, respectively, of compensation expense related to
stock options and restricted share awards is included in other incentive compensation expense.
At June 30, 2008, we employed 704.5 full-time equivalent employees compared to 441.0 at June 30,
2007. We intend to continue to add employees in both the Nashville and Knoxville markets to our
work force for the foreseeable future, which will cause our salary costs to increase in future
periods.
We believe that variable pay incentives are a valuable tool in motivating an employee base that is
focused on providing our clients effective financial advice and increasing shareholder value. As a
result, and unlike many other financial institutions, our salary-based employees have historically
participated in our annual cash incentive plan. Under the plan, the targeted level of incentive
payments requires the Company to achieve a certain soundness threshold and a targeted fully diluted
earnings per share. To the extent that actual earnings per share are above or below targeted
earnings per share, the aggregate incentive payments are increased or decreased. Additionally, our
Human Resources and Compensation Committee (the Committee) of the Board of Directors has the
ability to change the parameters of the variable cash award at any time prior to final distribution
of the awards in order to take into account current events and circumstances that were not
anticipated when the parameters were established and maximize the benefit of the awards to our firm
and to the associates.
Page 35
Included in the salary and employee benefits amounts for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007, were $1.3 million and $581,000, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007, were $2.8 million and $1.2 million, respectively, of variable cash awards expense. This
expense will fluctuate from year to year and quarter to quarter based on the estimation of
achievement of performance targets and the increase in the number of associates eligible to receive
the award. Based on our current earnings forecast for 2008, considering the results of the six
months ended June 30, 2008, we have anticipated a cash award to qualifying associates equal to 85%
of their targeted award and consequently we have recorded incentive expense of 85% of the targeted
award for the first six months of 2008. We will continue to review our anticipated 2008 cash
incentive expense throughout 2008 and may require us to increase or decrease the anticipated award
above or below the 85% target percentage at June 30, 2008 based on the new estimate. For the six
months ended June 30, 2007, the anticipated award to be paid to associates equaled 40% of their
targeted award.
Equipment and occupancy expenses in the second quarter of 2008 were greater than the second quarter
of 2007 amount by 72%. This increase is primarily attributable to our market expansion to
Knoxville, Tennessee which began in the second quarter of 2007, our new branch facility in the
Donelson area of Nashville which opened late in the first quarter of 2007, and a full quarter of
expenses associated with the 11 Mid-America branches which were acquired on November 30, 2007.
These additions contributed to the increase in our equipment and occupancy expenses between the two
periods we expect increases in these expenses in the future as we construct new facilities,
including new facilities currently planned in both the Nashville and Knoxville MSAs.
Marketing and other business development and postage and supplies expenses are higher in 2008
compared to 2007 due to increases in the number of customers and prospective customers; increases
in the number of customer contact personnel and the corresponding increases in customer
entertainment; and other business development expenses.
Included in noninterest expense is amortization of the core deposit intangible. For Mid-America,
this identified intangible is being amortized over ten years using an accelerated method which
anticipates the life of the underlying deposits. For Cavalry, this identified intangible is being
amortized over seven years using an accelerated method which anticipates the life of the underlying
deposits. Amortization expense associated with these core deposit intangibles will approximate
$2.5 million to $2.9 million per year for the next five years with lesser amounts for the remaining
years.
Additionally, for the six months ended June 30, 2008, we incurred $4.45 million of merger related
expense directly associated with the Mid-America merger. The merger related charges consisted of
integration costs incurred in connection with the merger, including approximately $2.5 million of
retention bonuses payable to Mid-America associates, $876,000 in conversion-related incentive
payments and other personnel costs, $737,000 in information technology conversion costs and
$391,000 in other integration charges. We anticipate additional merger related expenses
associated with the Mid-America transaction in 2008 of approximately $2.5 million.
Other noninterest expenses increased 65.6% in the second quarter of 2008 when compared to 2007 and
66.1% in the first half of 2008 over 2007. Most of these increases are attributable to increased
insurance and other noninterest expenses which include incidental variable costs related to deposit
gathering and lending. Examples include expenses related to ATM networks, correspondent bank
service charges, check losses, appraisal expenses, closing attorney expenses, the Visa litigation
and other items which have increased significantly as a result of the Mid-America merger.
Our efficiency ratio (ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net interest income and
noninterest income) was 62.8% for the second quarter of 2008 compared to 62.4% in the second
quarter 2007 and 67.0% for the first six months of 2008 compared to 60.9% in 2007. The efficiency
ratio measures the amount of expense that is incurred to generate a dollar of revenue. These
calculations include the impact of approximately $1.3 million and $4.5 million in Mid-America
merger related expenses incurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
Page 36
Financial Condition
Total assets grew to $4.11 billion at June 30, 2008 from $3.79 billion at December 31, 2007, an
increase of 8.2%.
Loans. The composition of loans at June 30, 2008 and at December 31, 2007 and the percentage (%)
of each classification to total loans are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
Commercial real estate Mortgage
|
|
$ |
831,829 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
$710,546 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
% |
Consumer real estate Mortgage
|
|
|
587,025 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
539,768 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
% |
Construction and land development
|
|
|
632,764 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
582,959 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
% |
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
886,656 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
% |
|
|
794,419 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
% |
Consumer and other loans
|
|
|
93,998 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
121,949 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$ |
3,032,272 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,749,641 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although the allocation of our loan portfolio did not change significantly during the six months
ended June 30, 2008 when compared to December 31, 2007, we did experience an increase of 17.1% in
the commercial real estate classification. A portion of this increase is attributable to
reclassification of borrowers in the conversion of the Mid-America loan systems to our loan
accounting systems. In addition, loan balances at December 31, 2007 have been reclassified to be
consistent with the June 30, 2008 classification. We continue to have loan demand for our
commercial real estate and construction lending products and we will continue to pursue sound,
prudently underwritten real estate lending opportunities. Because these types of loans require
that we maintain effective credit and construction monitoring systems, we have increased our
resources in this area. We believe we can effectively manage this area of exposure due to our
strategic focus of hiring experienced professionals who are well-trained in this type of lending
and who have significant experience in our geographic market.
We periodically analyze our commercial loan portfolio to determine if a concentration of credit
risk exists to any one or more industries. We use broadly accepted industry classification systems
in order to classify borrowers into various industry classifications. As a result, we have a
credit exposure (loans outstanding plus unfunded commitments) exceeding 25% of Pinnacle Nationals
total risk-based capital to borrowers in the following industries at June 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Exposure at |
|
|
|
Balances |
|
|
Commitments |
|
|
Total exposure |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Lessors of nonresidential buildings |
|
$ |
283,749 |
|
|
$ |
37,100 |
|
|
$ |
320,849 |
|
|
$ |
249,959 |
|
Lessors of residential buildings |
|
|
112,502 |
|
|
|
14,527 |
|
|
|
127,029 |
|
|
|
135,413 |
|
Land subdividers |
|
|
216,344 |
|
|
|
68,203 |
|
|
|
284,547 |
|
|
|
283,327 |
|
New housing operative builders |
|
|
180,620 |
|
|
|
84,809 |
|
|
|
265,429 |
|
|
|
269,744 |
|
Trucking industry |
|
|
77,585 |
|
|
|
21,731 |
|
|
|
99,316 |
|
|
|
109,118 |
|
New single family housing construction |
|
|
58,533 |
|
|
|
20,220 |
|
|
|
78,753 |
|
|
|
104,980 |
|
Page 37
The following table classifies our fixed and variable rate loans at June 30, 2008 according to
contractual maturities of (1) one year or less, (2) after one year through five years, and (3)
after five years. The table also classifies our variable rate loans pursuant to the contractual
repricing dates of the underlying loans (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
Rates |
|
|
Rates |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Based on contractual maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
222,891 |
|
|
$ |
1,099,902 |
|
|
$ |
1,322,793 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
% |
|
|
44.5 |
% |
Due in one year to five years |
|
|
785,569 |
|
|
|
360,836 |
|
|
|
1,146,405 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
% |
|
|
39.9 |
% |
Due after five years |
|
|
132,536 |
|
|
|
430,538 |
|
|
|
563,074 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,140,996 |
|
|
$ |
1,891,276 |
|
|
$ |
3,032,272 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on contractual repricing dates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily floating rate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,317,443 |
|
|
$ |
1,317,443 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
% |
|
|
40.0 |
% |
Due within one year |
|
|
222,891 |
|
|
|
467,913 |
|
|
|
690,804 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
Due in one year to five years |
|
|
785,569 |
|
|
|
94,735 |
|
|
|
880,304 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
% |
|
|
32.4 |
% |
Due after five years |
|
|
132,536 |
|
|
|
11,185 |
|
|
|
143,721 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,140,996 |
|
|
$ |
1,891,276 |
|
|
$ |
3,032,272 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above information does not consider the impact of scheduled principal payments. Daily floating
rate loans are tied to Pinnacle Nationals prime lending rate or a national interest rate index
with the underlying loan rates changing in relation to changes in these indexes. |
Non-Performing Assets. The specific economic and credit risks associated with our loan
portfolio include, but are not limited to, a general downturn in the economy which could affect
employment rates in our market area, general real estate market deterioration, interest rate
fluctuations, deteriorated or non-existent collateral, title defects, inaccurate appraisals,
financial deterioration of borrowers, fraud, and any violation of laws and regulations.
We attempt to reduce these economic and credit risks by adherence to loan to value guidelines for
collateralized loans, by investigating the creditworthiness of the borrower and by monitoring the
borrowers financial position. Also, we establish and periodically review our lending policies and
procedures. Banking regulations limit our exposure by prohibiting loan relationships that exceed
15% of Pinnacle Nationals statutory capital in the case of loans that are not fully secured by
readily marketable or other permissible types of collateral. Furthermore, we have an internal
limit for aggregate credit exposure (loans outstanding plus unfunded commitments) to a single
borrower of $22 million. Our loan policy requires that our board of directors approve any
relationships that exceed this internal limit.
We discontinue the accrual of interest income when (1) there is a significant deterioration in the
financial condition of the borrower and full repayment of principal and interest is not expected or
(2) the principal or interest is more than 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well-secured
and in the process of collection. At June 30, 2008, we had $13.1 million in loans on nonaccrual
compared to $19.7 million at December 31, 2007. The decrease in nonperforming loans between June
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was primarily related to the foreclosure of certain nonperforming
loans and the subsequent transfer of those balances to other real estate owned.
At June 30, 2008, we owned $9.2 million in real estate which we had acquired, usually through
foreclosure, from borrowers compared to $1.7 million at December 31, 2007. Substantially all of
these amounts relate to homes that are in various stages of construction for which we believe we
have adequate collateral.
Page 38
There were $2.3 million of other loans 90 past due and still accruing interest at June 30, 2008
compared to $1.61 million at December 31, 2007. At June 30, 2008 and at December 31, 2007, no
loans were deemed to be restructured loans. The following table is a summary of our nonperforming
assets at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Nonaccrual loans (1) |
|
$ |
13,067 |
|
|
$ |
19,677 |
|
Restructured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
9,183 |
|
|
|
1,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
|
22,250 |
|
|
|
21,350 |
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
|
|
2,272 |
|
|
|
1,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets and accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
|
$ |
24,522 |
|
|
$ |
22,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans outstanding |
|
$ |
3,032,272 |
|
|
$ |
2,749,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of nonperforming assets and accruing loans past due 90 days or
more to total loans outstanding at end of period |
|
|
0.81 |
% |
|
|
0.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of nonperforming assets and accruing loans past 90 days or more
to total allowance for loan losses at end of period |
|
|
77.14 |
% |
|
|
80.66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest income that would have been recorded during the six months ended June 30,
2008 related to nonaccrual loans was $624,000. |
Potential problem assets, which are not included in nonperforming assets, amounted to
approximately $12.2 million or 0.40% of total loans outstanding at June 30, 2008 compared to $15.3
million or .56% at December 31, 2007. Potential problem assets represent those assets with a
well-defined weakness and where information about possible credit problems of borrowers has caused
management to have serious doubts about the borrowers ability to comply with present repayment
terms. This definition is believed to be substantially consistent with the standards established
by the OCC, Pinnacle Nationals primary regulator, for loans classified as substandard, excluding
the impact of nonperforming loans.
Allowance for Loan Losses (allowance). We maintain the allowance at a level that our management
deems appropriate to adequately cover the inherent risks in the loan portfolio. As of June 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007, our allowance for loan losses was $31.8 million and $28.5 million,
respectively, which our management deemed to be adequate at each of the respective dates. The
judgments and estimates associated with our ALL determination are described under Critical
Accounting Estimates above.
Page 39
The following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the ratio of the allowance for loan
losses to total loans as of the end of each period (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
28,470 |
|
|
$ |
16,118 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
4,720 |
|
Allowance from Mid-America acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,695 |
|
Charged-off loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
(364 |
) |
Construction and land development |
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
(326 |
) |
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charged-off loans |
|
|
(1,786 |
) |
|
|
(1,342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries of previously charged-off loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
Construction and land development |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries of previously charged-off loans |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries |
|
|
(1,060 |
) |
|
|
(1,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
31,789 |
|
|
$ |
28,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding at end of
period |
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
|
1.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of net charge-offs (*) to average loans outstanding for the period |
|
|
0.07 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2008 have been annualized. |
As noted in our critical accounting policies, management assesses the adequacy of the
allowance prior to the end of each calendar quarter. This assessment includes procedures to
estimate the allowance and test the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting balance. The
level of the allowance is based upon managements evaluation of the loan portfolios, past loan loss
experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the
borrowers ability to repay (including the timing of future payment), the estimated value of any
underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, economic conditions, industry and peer
bank loan quality indications and other pertinent factors. This evaluation is inherently
subjective as it requires material estimates including the amounts and timing of future cash flows
expected to be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to significant change. The
allowance increased by $3.32 million between June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 and the ratio of
our allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding increased to 1.05% at June 30, 2008.
Investments. Our investment portfolio, consisting primarily of Federal agency bonds, state and
municipal securities and mortgage-backed securities, amounted to $521.2 million and $522.7 million
at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Our investment portfolio serves many
purposes including serving as a stable source of income, collateral for public funds and as a
potential liquidity source. A summary of our investment portfolio at June 30, 2008 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Weighted average life |
|
6.46 years |
Weighted average coupon |
|
|
4.99% |
|
Tax equivalent yield |
|
|
5.38% |
|
Page 40
Deposits and Other Borrowings. We had approximately $3.15 billion of deposits at June 30, 2008
compared to $2.93 billion at December 31, 2007. Our deposits consist of noninterest and
interest-bearing demand accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts and time deposits.
Additionally, we entered into agreements with certain customers to sell certain of our securities
under agreements to repurchase the security the following day. These agreements (which are
typically associated with comprehensive treasury management programs for our clients and provide
them with short-term returns for their excess funds) amounted to $183.2 million at June 30, 2008
and $156.1 million at December 31, 2007. Additionally, at June 30, 2008, we had borrowed $168.5
million in advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati compared to $92.8 million at
December 31, 2007.
Generally, banks classify their funding base as either core funding or non-core funding. Core
funding consists of all deposits other than time deposits issued in denominations of $100,000 or
greater. All other funding is deemed to be non-core. The following table represents the balances
of our deposits and other fundings and the percentage of each type to the total at June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Percent |
|
Core funding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposit accounts |
|
$ |
438,458 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
$ |
400,120 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
% |
Interest-bearing demand accounts |
|
|
390,957 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
410,661 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
% |
Savings and money market accounts |
|
|
719,962 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
742,354 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
% |
Time deposit accounts less than $100,000 |
|
|
382,684 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
371,881 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core funding |
|
|
1,932,061 |
|
|
|
53.6 |
% |
|
|
1,925,016 |
|
|
|
58.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-core funding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposit accounts greater than $100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public funds |
|
|
245,661 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
104,902 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
Brokered deposits |
|
|
369,871 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
163,188 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
Other time deposits |
|
|
604,921 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
732,213 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
% |
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase |
|
|
183,188 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
156,071 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
187,315 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
141,666 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
Subordinated debt |
|
|
82,476 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
82,476 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-core funding |
|
|
1,673,432 |
|
|
|
46.4 |
% |
|
|
1,380,516 |
|
|
|
41.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
3,605,493 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,305,532 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our funding policies limit the amount of non-core funding we can use to support our growth.
As noted in the table above, our core funding decreased from 58.2% at December 31, 2007 to 53.6% at
June 30, 2008. Although growing our core deposit base is a key strategic objective of our firm, we
believe that our dependence on non-core funding will increase, but remain within our policies, as
we continue to fund the rapid growth of our loan portfolio.
The amount of time deposits as of June 30, 2008 amounted to $1.60 billion. The following table
shows our time deposits in denominations of under $100,000 and those of denominations of $100,000
or greater by category based on time remaining until maturity of (1) three months or less, (2) over
three but less than six months, (3) over six but less than twelve months and (4) over twelve months
and the weighted average rate for each category (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances |
|
Weighted Avg. Rate |
Denominations less than $100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months or less |
|
$ |
154,341 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
% |
Over three but less than six months |
|
|
81,774 |
|
|
|
3.57 |
% |
Over six but less than twelve months |
|
|
104,483 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
% |
Over twelve months |
|
|
42,086 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382,684 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denomination $100,000 and greater |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months or less |
|
|
481,392 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
% |
Over three but less than six months |
|
|
309,814 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
% |
Over six but less than twelve months |
|
|
281,404 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
% |
Over twelve months |
|
|
147,843 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,220,453 |
|
|
|
3.57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,603,137 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 41
Subordinated debt. On December 29, 2003, we established PNFP Statutory Trust I; on September 15,
2005 we established PNFP Statutory Trust II; on September 7, 2006 we established PNFP Statutory
Trust III and on October 31, 2007 we established PNFP Statutory Trust IV (Trust I; Trust II;
Trust III, Trust IV or collectively, the Trusts). All are wholly-owned statutory business
trusts. We are the sole sponsor of the Trusts and acquired each Trusts common securities for
$310,000; $619,000; $619,000 and $928,000, respectively. The Trusts were created for the exclusive
purpose of issuing 30-year capital trust preferred securities (Trust Preferred Securities) in the
aggregate amount of $10,000,000 for Trust I; $20,000,000 for Trust II; $20,000,000 for Trust III
and $30,000,000 for Trust IV and using the proceeds to acquire junior subordinated debentures
(Subordinated Debentures) issued by Pinnacle Financial. The sole assets of the Trusts are the
Subordinated Debentures. Our $2,476,000 investment in the Trusts is included in investments in
unconsolidated subsidiaries in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and our $82,476,000
obligation is reflected as subordinated debt.
The Trust I Preferred Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR
(5.614% at June 30, 2008) which is set each quarter and matures on December 30, 2033. The Trust II
Preferred Securities bear a fixed interest rate of 5.848% per annum thru September 30, 2010 after
which time the securities will bear a floating rate set each quarter based on a spread over 3-month
LIBOR. The Trust II securities mature on September 30, 2035. The Trust III Preferred Securities
bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (4.451% at June 30, 2008) which
is set each quarter and mature on September 30, 2036. The Trust IV Preferred Securities bear a
floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (5.626% at June 30, 2008) which is set
each quarter and matures on September 30, 2037.
Distributions are payable quarterly. The Trust Preferred Securities are subject to mandatory
redemption upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures at their stated maturity date or their
earlier redemption in an amount equal to their liquidation amount plus accumulated and unpaid
distributions to the date of redemption. We guarantee the payment of distributions and payments
for redemption or liquidation of the Trust Preferred Securities to the extent of funds held by the
Trusts. Pinnacle Financials obligations under the Subordinated Debentures together with the
guarantee and other back-up obligations, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional
guarantee by Pinnacle Financial of the obligations of the Trusts under the Trust Preferred
Securities.
The Subordinated Debentures are unsecured; bear interest at a rate equal to the rates paid by the
Trusts on the Trust Preferred Securities and mature on the same dates as those noted above for the
Trust Preferred Securities. Interest is payable quarterly. We may defer the payment of interest
at any time for a period not exceeding 20 consecutive quarters provided that the deferral period
does not extend past the stated maturity. During any such deferral period, distributions on the
Trust Preferred Securities will also be deferred and our ability to pay dividends on our common
shares will be restricted.
Subject to approval by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, the Trust Preferred Securities may be
redeemed prior to maturity at our option on or after September 17, 2008 for Trust I; on or after
September 30, 2010 for Trust II; September 30, 2011 for Trust III and September 30, 2012 for Trust
IV. The Trust Preferred Securities may also be redeemed at any time in whole (but not in part) in
the event of unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that result in (1) the Trust becoming
subject to Federal income tax on income received on the Subordinated Debentures, (2) interest
payable by the parent company on the Subordinated Debentures becoming non-deductible for Federal
tax purposes, (3) the requirement for the Trust to register under the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended, or (4) loss of the ability to treat the Trust Preferred Securities as Tier I
capital under the Federal Reserve capital adequacy guidelines.
The Trust Preferred Securities for the Trusts qualify as Tier I capital under current regulatory
definitions subject to certain limitations. Debt issuance costs associated with Trust I of
$120,000 consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and professional fees are included in other
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. These debt issuance costs are being
amortized over ten years using the straight-line method. There were no debt issuance costs
associated with Trust II, Trust III or Trust IV.
At June 30, 2008, we had a loan agreement related to a $25 million line of credit with a regional
bank. This line of credit will be used to support the growth of Pinnacle National. The balance
owed pursuant to this line of credit at June 30, 2008 was $18 million. The $25 million line of
credit has a one year term, contains customary affirmative and negative covenants regarding the
operation of our business, a negative pledge on the common stock of Pinnacle National and is priced
at 30-day LIBOR plus 125 basis points.
On August 5, 2008, Pinnacle National also entered into a $15 million subordinated term loan with a
regional bank. The loan will bear interest at three month Libor plus 3.5%, mature in seven years
and will qualify as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes. This additional capital will be
utilized to support our anticipated growth.
Capital Resources. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our stockholders equity amounted to
$481.7 million and $466.6 million, respectively, or an increase of $15.1million. This increase was
primarily attributable to $12.6 million in comprehensive
Page 42
income, which was composed of $14.0 million in net income together with $1.4 million of net
unrealized holding losses associated with our available-for-sale portfolio.
Dividends. Pinnacle National is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to Pinnacle
Financial under Federal banking laws and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, Pinnacle National paid $2.7 million in
dividends to Pinnacle Financial. Pinnacle Financial is subject to limits on payment of dividends
to its shareholders by the rules, regulations and policies of Federal banking authorities and the
laws of the State of Tennessee. Pinnacle Financial has not paid any dividends to date, nor does it
anticipate paying dividends to its shareholders for the foreseeable future. Future dividend policy
will depend on Pinnacle Financials earnings, capital position, financial condition and other
factors.
Market and Liquidity Risk Management
Our objective is to manage assets and liabilities to provide a satisfactory, consistent level of
profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment, borrowing, and
capital policies. Our Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO) is charged with the
responsibility of monitoring these policies, which are designed to ensure acceptable composition of
asset/liability mix. Two critical areas of focus for ALCO are interest rate sensitivity and
liquidity risk management.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. In the normal course of business, we are exposed to market risk arising
from fluctuations in interest rates. ALCO measures and evaluates the interest rate risk so that we
can meet customer demands for various types of loans and deposits. ALCO determines the most
appropriate amounts of on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet items. Measurements which we use to
help us manage interest rate sensitivity include an earnings simulation model and an economic value
of equity model. These measurements are used in conjunction with competitive pricing analysis.
Earnings simulation model. We believe that interest rate risk is best measured by our
earnings simulation modeling. Forecasted levels of earning assets, interest-bearing
liabilities, and off-balance sheet financial instruments are combined with ALCO forecasts
of interest rates for the next 12 months and are combined with other factors in order to
produce various earnings simulations. To limit interest rate risk, we have guidelines for
our earnings at risk which seek to limit the variance of net interest income to less than a
20 percent decline for a 300 basis point change up or down in rates from managements flat
interest rate forecast over the next twelve months; to less than a 10 percent decline for a
200 basis point change up or down in rates from managements flat interest rate forecast
over the next twelve months; and to less than a 5 percent decline for a 100 basis point
change up or down in rates from managements flat interest rate forecast over the next
twelve months. The results of our current simulation model would indicate that we are in
compliance with our current guidelines at June 30, 2008.
Economic value of equity. Our economic value of equity model measures the extent that
estimated economic values of our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items will
change as a result of interest rate changes. Economic values are determined by discounting
expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items, which establishes
a base case economic value of equity. To help limit interest rate risk, we have a
guideline stating that for an instantaneous 300 basis point change in interest rates up or
down, the economic value of equity should not decrease by more than 30 percent from the
base case; for a 200 basis point instantaneous change in interest rates up or down, the
economic value of equity should not decrease by more than 20 percent; and for a 100 basis
point instantaneous change in interest rates up or down, the economic value of equity
should not decrease by more than 10 percent. The results of our current economic value of
equity model would indicate that we are in compliance with our current guidelines at June
30, 2008.
Each of the above analyses may not, on its own, be an accurate indicator of how our net interest
income will be affected by changes in interest rates. Income associated with interest-earning
assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by
changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates
may have a significant impact on net interest income. For example, although certain assets and
liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react in different
degrees to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and
liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in general market rates, while interest rates on other
types may lag behind changes in general market rates. In addition, certain assets, such as
adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features (generally referred to as interest rate caps and
floors) which limit changes in interest rates. Prepayment and early withdrawal levels also could
deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the maturity of certain instruments. The
ability of many borrowers to service their debts also may decrease during periods of rising
interest rates. ALCO reviews each of the above interest rate sensitivity analyses along with
several different interest rate scenarios as part of its responsibility to provide a satisfactory,
consistent level of profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment,
borrowing, and capital policies.
We may also use derivative financial instruments to improve the balance between interest-sensitive
assets and interest-sensitive liabilities and as one tool to manage our interest rate sensitivity
while continuing to meet the credit and deposit needs of our customers. Beginning in 2007, we
entered into interest rate swaps (swaps) to facilitate customer transactions and meet their
Page 43
financing needs. These swaps qualify as derivatives, but are not designed as hedging instruments.
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had not entered into any derivative contracts to assist
managing our interest rate sensitivity.
Liquidity Risk Management. The purpose of liquidity risk management is to ensure that there are
sufficient cash flows to satisfy loan demand, deposit withdrawals, and our other needs.
Traditional sources of liquidity for a bank include asset maturities and growth in core deposits.
A bank may achieve its desired liquidity objectives from the management of its assets and
liabilities and by internally generated funding through its operations. Funds invested in
marketable instruments that can be readily sold and the continuous maturing of other earning assets
are sources of liquidity from an asset perspective. The liability base provides sources of
liquidity through attraction of increased deposits and borrowing funds from various other
institutions.
Changes in interest rates also affect our liquidity position. We currently price deposits in
response to market rates and our management intends to continue this policy. If deposits are not
priced in response to market rates, a loss of deposits could occur which would negatively affect
our liquidity position.
Scheduled loan payments are a relatively stable source of funds, but loan payoffs and deposit flows
fluctuate significantly, being influenced by interest rates, general economic conditions and
competition. Additionally, debt security investments are subject to prepayment and call provisions
that could accelerate their payoff prior to stated maturity. We attempt to price our deposit
products to meet our asset/liability objectives consistent with local market conditions. Our ALCO
is responsible for monitoring our ongoing liquidity needs. Our regulators also monitor our
liquidity and capital resources on a periodic basis.
In addition, Pinnacle National is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati. As a
result, Pinnacle National receives advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, pursuant
to the terms of various borrowing agreements, which assist it in the funding of its home mortgage
and commercial real estate loan portfolios. Pinnacle National has pledged under the borrowing
agreements with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati certain qualifying residential mortgage
loans and, pursuant to a blanket lien, all qualifying commercial mortgage loans as collateral. At
June 30, 2008, Pinnacle National had received advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Cincinnati totaling $168.5 million at the following rates and maturities (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest Rates |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
% |
2009 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
% |
2010 |
|
|
22,670 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
% |
2012 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
3.51 |
% |
Thereafter |
|
|
60,870 |
|
|
|
2.92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
168,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle National also has accommodations with upstream correspondent banks for unsecured
short-term advances. These accommodations have various covenants related to their term and
availability, and in most cases must be repaid within less than a month. Although there were no
amounts outstanding under these agreements at June 30, 2008, for the six months ended June 30,
2008, we averaged borrowings from correspondent banks of $32.8 million under such agreements.
At June 30, 2008, brokered certificates of deposit approximated $369.9 million which represented
10.3% of total fundings compared to $163.2 million and 4.9% at December 31, 2007. We issue these
brokered certificates through several different brokerage houses based on competitive bid.
Typically, these funds are for varying maturities from six months to two years and are issued at
rates which are competitive to rates we would be required to pay to attract similar deposits from
the local market as well as rates for Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati advances of similar
maturities. We consider these deposits to be a ready source of liquidity under current market
conditions.
At June 30, 2008, we had no significant commitments for capital expenditures. However, we are in
the process of developing our branch network or other office facilities in the Nashville MSA and
the Knoxville MSA. As a result, we anticipate that we will enter into contracts to buy property or
construct branch facilities and/or lease agreements to lease facilities in the Nashville MSA and
Knoxville MSA, including recently entering into agreements to relocate our downtown office facility
in Nashville, Tennessee to a new facility projected to open in 2010.
Our management believes that we have adequate liquidity to meet all known contractual obligations
and unfunded commitments, including loan commitments and reasonable borrower, depositor, and
creditor requirements over the next twelve months.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. At June 30, 2008, we had outstanding standby letters of credit of
$89.2 million and unfunded loan commitments outstanding of $823.8 million. Because these
commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and many will expire without being drawn upon,
the total commitment level does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. If needed to
Page 44
fund these outstanding commitments, Pinnacle National has the ability to liquidate Federal funds
sold or securities available-for-sale, or on a short-term basis to borrow and purchase Federal
funds from other financial institutions.
Impact of Inflation
The consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial data presented herein have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and
practices within the banking industry which require the measurement of financial position and
operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative
purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually
all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result,
interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institutions performance than the
effects of general levels of inflation.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements SFAS No. 157, which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies
only to fair-value measurements that are already required or permitted by other accounting
standards and is expected to increase the consistency of those measurements. The definition of
fair value focuses on the exit price, i.e., the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date, not the entry price, i.e., the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or
received to assume the liability at the measurement date. The statement emphasizes that fair value
is a market-based measurement; not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, the fair value
measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability. The effective date for SFAS No. 157 was for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Pinnacle Financial adopted
SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2008.
In February of 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 159 (SFAS
159), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which gives entities
the option to measure eligible financial assets, and financial liabilities at fair value on an
instrument by instrument basis, that are otherwise not permitted to be accounted for at fair value
under other accounting standards. The election to use the fair value option is available when an
entity first recognizes a financial asset or financial liability. Subsequent changes in fair value
must be recorded in earnings. This statement was effective as of January 1, 2008, however it had no
impact on the consolidated financial statements of Pinnacle Financial because it did not elect the
fair value option for any financial instrument not presently being accounting for at fair value.
In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF No. 06-4, Accounting for Deferred
Compensation and Postretirement Benefits Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements. The EITF concluded that deferred compensation or postretirement benefit aspects of
an endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangement should be recognized as a liability by the
employer and the obligation is not effectively settled by the purchase of a life insurance policy.
The effective date was for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. On January 1, 2008, we
accounted for this EITF as a change in accounting principle and recorded a liability of $985,000
along with a corresponding adjustment of $598,700 to beginning retained earnings, net of tax.
In December 2007, the SEC issued SAB 110, Share-Based Payment. SAB 110 allows eligible public
companies to continue to use a simplified method for estimating the expense of stock options if
their own historical experience isnt sufficient to provide a reasonable basis. Under SAB 107,
Share-Based Payment, the simplified method was scheduled to expire for all grants made after
December 31, 2007. The SAB describes disclosures that should be provided if a company is using the
simplified method for all or a portion of its stock option grants beyond December 31, 2007. The
provisions of this bulletin became effective on January 1, 2008. Pinnacle Financial continues to
use the simplified method allowed by SAB 110 for determining the expected term component for share
options granted during 2008.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, Business Combinations. SFAS 141R clarifies the
definitions of both a business combination and a business. All business combinations will be
accounted for under the acquisition method (previously referred to as the purchase method). This
standard defines the acquisition date as the only relevant date for recognition and measurement of
the fair value of consideration paid. SFAS 141R requires the acquirer to expense all acquisition
related costs. SFAS 141R will also require acquired loans to be recorded net of the allowance for
loan losses on the date of acquisition. SFAS 141R defines the measurement period as the time after
the acquisition date during which the acquirer may make adjustments to the provisional amounts
recognized at the acquisition date. This period cannot exceed one year, and any subsequent
adjustments made to provisional amounts are done retrospectively and restate prior period data. The
provisions of this statement are effective for business combinations during fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. Pinnacle Financial has not determined the impact
Page 45
that SFAS 141R will have on its financial position and results of operations and believes that such
determination will not be meaningful until Pinnacle Financial enters into a business combination.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in consolidated financial
statements An Amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS No. 160 requires noncontrolling interests to be
treated as a separate component of equity, not as a liability or other item outside of equity.
Disclosure requirements include net income and comprehensive income to be displayed for both the
controlling and noncontrolling interests and a separate schedule that shows the effects of any
transactions with the noncontrolling interests on the equity attributable to the controlling
interest. The provisions of this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008. This statement should be applied prospectively except for the presentation and disclosure
requirements which shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. Pinnacle Financial
does not expect the impact of SFAS No. 160 on its financial position, results of operations or cash
flows to be material.
In December 2007, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 07-6, Accounting for Sales of
Real Estate Subject to the Requirements of FASB Statement No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real
Estate, When the Agreement Includes a Buy-Sell Clause (EITF 07-6). EITF 07-6 clarifies whether
a buy-sell clause is a prohibited form of continuing involvement that would preclude partial sales
treatment under FAS No. 66. EITF 07-6 is effective for new arrangements entered into and
assessments of existing transactions originally accounted for under the deposit, profit-sharing,
leasing, or financing methods for reasons other than the exercise of a buy-sell clause performed in
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. We do not expect EITF 07-6 to have a material
impact on our financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 161 (SFAS
161), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS 161 requires
companies with derivative instruments to disclose information that should enable
financial-statement users to understand how and why a company uses derivative instruments, how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect a companys financial position, financial performance and cash flows.
SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS 161
will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful
Life of Intangible Assets. FSP 142-3 amends the factors an entity should consider in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of recognized intangible
assets under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This new guidance
applies prospectively to intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other
assets in business combinations and asset acquisitions. FSP 142-3 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. Early
adoption is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that FSP 142-3 will have on
our consolidated financial statements.
Page 46
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The information required by this Item 3 is included on pages 43 through 45 of Part I Item 2 -
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Pinnacle Financial maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by it in the reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to Pinnacle Financials management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Pinnacle
Financial carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its
management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls
and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Pinnacle
Financials disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in Pinnacle Financials internal control over financial reporting during
Pinnacle Financials fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, Pinnacle Financials internal control over financial
reporting.
Page 47
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or of which
any of their property is the subject.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes to our risk factors as previously disclosed in Part I,
Item IA of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
|
(a) |
|
Not applicable |
|
|
(b) |
|
Not applicable |
|
|
(c) |
|
The Company did not repurchase any shares of the Companys common
stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
Not applicable
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
|
(a) |
|
Our annual meeting of the shareholders was held on April 15, 2007. There
were 18,324,041 shares of common stock represented at the meeting either in person or
by proxy. |
|
|
(b) |
|
The following directors were elected at the meeting to serve until the annual
meeting of shareholders in the year 2010 (Class I): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
Votes |
|
|
Broker |
|
|
|
For |
|
|
Withheld |
|
|
Non-votes |
|
H. Gordon Bone |
|
|
17,983,062 |
|
|
|
340,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gary L. Scott |
|
|
17,944,782 |
|
|
|
379,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following directors were elected at the meeting to serve until the annual
meeting of shareholders in the year 2011 (Class II):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes |
|
|
Votes |
|
|
Broker |
|
|
|
For |
|
|
Withheld |
|
|
Non-votes |
|
James C. Cope |
|
|
15,981,106 |
|
|
|
2,342,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
William H. Huddleston, IV |
|
|
17,962,835 |
|
|
|
361,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
Robert A. McCabe, Jr. |
|
|
17,937,809 |
|
|
|
386,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hal N. Pennington |
|
|
17,943,782 |
|
|
|
380,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
David Major |
|
|
17,979,242 |
|
|
|
344,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Wayne J. Riley |
|
|
17,977,606 |
|
|
|
346,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 48
|
(c) |
|
Other matters voted upon and the results of the voting were as follows: |
At the annual meeting of shareholders, the shareholders also ratified the
appointment of KPMG LLP as Pinnacle Financials independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. The shareholders
voted 17,783,522 in the affirmative and 62,323 against the proposal with 45,195
abstentions and 433,001 broker non-votes.
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
Page 49
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.
|
|
|
/s/ M. Terry Turner
|
|
|
M. Terry Turner |
|
August 6, 2008 |
President and Chief Executive Officer
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Harold R. Carpenter
|
|
|
Harold R. Carpenter |
|
August 6, 2008 |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Page 50