supplemental information
additional information
Quarter
Quarter
ended
ended
Dec 2006
Dec 2005
US$ million
US$ million
1. Profit for the period to EBITDA
(1)
reconciliation
Profit for the period
30
-
Net finance costs
37
27
Taxation – current
6
8
– deferred
19
14
Depreciation
95
97
EBITDA
(1) (2)
187
146
(1)
In connection with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules relating to “Conditions for Use of Non-GAAP Financial
Measures”, we have reconciled EBITDA to net profit rather than operating profit. As a result our definition retains non-trading profit/loss
and minority interest as part of EBITDA. EBITDA represents earnings before interest (net finance costs), taxation, depreciation and
amortisation. Net finance costs includes: gross interest paid; interest received; interest capitalised; net foreign exchange gains; and net
fair value adjustments on interest rate financial instruments. See the Group income statement for an explanation of the computation of
net finance costs. We use EBITDA as an internal measure of performance to benchmark and compare performance, both between
our own operations and as against other companies. EBITDA is a measure used by the group, together with measures of performance
under IFRS and US GAAP, to compare the relative performance of operations in planning, budgeting and reviewing the performances
of various businesses. We believe EBITDA is a useful and commonly used measure of financial performance in addition to net profit,
operating profit and other profitability measures under IFRS or US GAAP because it facilitates operating performance comparisons
from period to period and company to company. By eliminating potential differences in results of operations between periods or
companies caused by factors such as depreciation and amortization methods, historic cost and age of assets, financing and capital
structures and taxation positions or regimes, we believe EBITDA can provide a useful additional basis for comparing the current
performance of the underlying operations being evaluated. For these reasons, we believe EBITDA and similar measures are regularly
used by the investment community as a means of comparison of companies in our industry. Different companies and analysts may
calculate EBITDA differently, so making comparisons among companies on this basis should be done very carefully. EBITDA is not a
measure of performance under IFRS or US GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or construed as a substitute for operating
profit or net profit as an indicator of the company’s operations in accordance with IFRS or US GAAP.
(2)
The EBITDA calculation has been amended to eliminate the adjustment for fellings which previously resulted in fellings being
added back in the calculation as part of amortisation. Given the current accounting treatment of plantations, management has
concluded that eliminating such an adjustment would be more appropriate in determining the EBITDA performance measure in
future both for internal and reporting purposes. Prior year figures have been recalculated for comparison purposes as follows:
December 2005 quarter: decrease by US$17 million; September 2006 quarter: decrease by US$19 million.
2.
Calculation of Headline earnings *
Profit for the period
30
-
Write-off of assets
–
1
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
–
1
Headline earnings
30
2
Headline earnings per share
Headline earnings per share (US cents) *
13
1
Weighted average number of shares in issue (millions)
227.0
225.9
Diluted headline earnings per share (US cents) *
13
1
Weighted average number of shares on fully diluted basis (millions)
229.9
226.7
*
Headline earnings disclosure is a listings requirement by the JSE Limited.