clwt_20f.htm
FORM 20-F
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
Commission file number 000-22113
EURO TECH HOLDINGS COMPANY LIMITED
|
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
EURO TECH HOLDINGS COMPANY LIMITED
|
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)
|
|
British Virgin Islands
|
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
18/F Gee Chang Hong Centre, 65 Wong Chuk Hong Road, Hong Kong
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
T.C. Leung
FAX: 852-28734887
18/F Gee Change Hong Centre
65 Wong Chuk Hong Road
Hong Kong
|
(Name, Telephone, Email and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
|
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
Name of each exchange on which registered: NASDAQ
|
Ordinary Shares, no par value
|
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
Not Applicable
|
(Title of Class)
|
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
Not Applicable
|
(Title of Class)
|
Indicate the number of issued and outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report
|
2,069,223 Ordinary Shares
|
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. o Yes þ No
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. o Yes þ No
Note — Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posed on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one).
Large accelerated filer
|
o
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
þ
|
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP
|
þ
|
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued
by the International Accounting Standards Board
|
o
|
Other
|
o
|
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. o Item 17 o Item 18
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GLOSSARY
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART I
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
KEY INFORMATION
|
|
|
6
|
|
Item 3A.
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
6
|
|
Item 3D.
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
|
|
|
15
|
|
Item 4A.
|
History and Development of the Company
|
|
|
15
|
|
Item 4B.
|
Business Overview
|
|
|
16
|
|
Item 4C.
|
Organizational Structure
|
|
|
21
|
|
Item 4D.
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
|
|
|
22
|
|
Item 5A.
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
23
|
|
Item 5B.
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
25
|
|
Item 5C.
|
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses
|
|
|
28
|
|
Item 5D.
|
Trend Information
|
|
|
28
|
|
Item 5E.
|
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
|
|
|
28
|
|
Item 5F.
|
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
|
|
|
29
|
|
Item 6A.
|
Directors and Senior Management
|
|
|
29
|
|
Item 6B.
|
Compensation
|
|
|
30
|
|
Item 6C.
|
Board Practices
|
|
|
32
|
|
Item 6D.
|
Employees
|
|
|
33
|
|
Item 6E.
|
Share Ownership
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
|
|
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Major Shareholders
|
|
|
33
|
|
Item 7B.
|
Related Party Transactions
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
34
|
|
Item 8A.
|
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
|
|
|
34
|
|
Item 8B.
|
Significant Changes
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
THE OFFERING AND LISTING
|
|
|
34
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Listing Details
|
|
|
34
|
|
Item 9C.
|
Markets
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
35
|
|
Item 10A.
|
Share Capital
|
|
|
35
|
|
Item 10B.
|
Memorandum and Articles of Association
|
|
|
36
|
|
Item 10C.
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
37
|
|
Item 10D.
|
Exchange Controls
|
|
|
37
|
|
Item 10E.
|
Taxation
|
|
|
37
|
|
Item 10H.
|
Documents on Display
|
|
|
39
|
|
Item 10I.
|
Subsidiary Information
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITYHOLDERS
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 16.
|
[RESERVED]
|
|
|
|
|
Item 16A.
|
Audit Committee Financial Expert
|
|
|
42
|
|
Item 16B.
|
Code Of Ethics
|
|
|
42
|
|
Item 16C.
|
Principal Accountant Fees And Services
|
|
|
42
|
|
Item 16D.
|
Exemption From Listing Standards
|
|
|
43
|
|
Item 16E.
|
Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 18.
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 19.
|
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
45
|
|
Explanatory Note
In addition to the financial statements of Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (the “Company”) attached are the financial statements of Zhejiang Tianlan Environmental Protection Technology Company Limited (“Blue Sky”). The rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”) require that the Company file the financial statements of Blue Sky. However, the same SEC Rules also require that the financial statements of Zhejiang Jiahuan Eletronic Co., Ltd. (“Jia Huan”) be filed with this Report. Jia Huan’s financial statements are not included herein. The Company intends to appropriately amend this Report to include Jia Huan’s financial statements when said financial statements are ready.
In this Form 20-F, references to ”us”, “we”, the “Company” and “Euro Tech” are to Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited and its subsidiaries unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires.
Forward Looking Statements
This annual report contains forward looking statements. Additional written or oral forward looking statements may be made by the Company from time to time in filings with the Commission or otherwise. Such forward looking statements are within the meaning of that term in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Such statements may include, but not be limited to, projections of revenues, income, or loss, capital expenditures, plans for future operations, financing needs or plans, and plans relating to products or services of the Company, as well as assumptions relating to the foregoing. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” and similar expressions identify forward looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made. Forward looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified. Future events and actual results could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by, or underlying the forward looking statements. Statements in this Annual Report, including those contained in the sections entitled Part I, Item 3D. “Risk Factors” and Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and the notes to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, describe factors, among others, that could contribute to or cause such differences.
The following glossary of terms may be helpful in understanding the terminology used in this Annual Report.
Ambient Air:
|
|
Atmospheric air (outdoor as opposed to indoor air).
|
|
|
|
Anaerobic:
|
|
Treating waste water biologically in the absence of air.
|
|
|
|
Atomic Spectrometer:
|
|
An analytical instrument used to measure the presence of an element in a substance by testing a sample which is aspirated into a flame and atomized. The amount of light absorbed or emitted is measured. The amount of energy absorbed or emitted is proportional to the concentration of the element in the sample.
|
|
|
|
Coalescer:
|
|
A process that coalesces smaller oil particles to form larger oil particles that can readily float to a tank’s surface.
|
|
|
|
Colorimeter:
|
|
An analytical instrument that measures substance concentration by color intensity when the substance reacts to a chemical reagent.
|
|
|
|
Flow Injection Analyzer:
|
|
An analytical instrument with a special sampling system that uses a continuous stream of reagent(s) into which fluid samples are injected.
|
|
|
|
Human Machine Interface Software:
|
|
A type of software to interface (or coordinate) the interaction between machine or equipment and a human being.
|
|
|
|
Lamella:
|
|
Synthetic media installed in a clarifier tank to assist in particle flocculation (coming together in a “floc” or “flakes”)
|
|
|
|
Mass Spectrometer:
|
|
An analytical instrument that separates and identifies chemical constituents according to their mass-to-charge ratios and is used to identify organic compounds.
|
|
|
|
Membrane Biological Reactor (MBR):
|
|
A suspended-growth bioreactor combined with a membrane liquid/solids separation unit. The “MBR” uses an advanced membrane technology that treats biological wastes to a quality level which in many industries is sufficient for reuse or low-cost disposal to sewers.
|
|
|
|
Multi-Channel Digital Recorder:
|
|
A device that measures and records more than one input of a digitized signal (signal in the form of pulses).
|
|
|
|
Nitrosamines.
|
|
A group of carcinogenic compounds, which are a component of cigarette smoke, cause cancer in a number of organs, particularly in the liver, kidneys, and lungs.
|
|
|
|
pH Controller:
|
|
A process instrument that measures and controls the acidity or alkalinity of a fluid.
|
|
|
|
Reagent:
|
|
A chemical substance used to cause a chemical reaction and detect another substance.
|
|
|
|
Sequential Batch Reactor (SBR):
|
|
A waste-water treatment process that combines aeration and settling in one reactor tank thus saving on space. Used for the treatment of industrial waste-water as well as municipal sewage. The SBR is a batch process that is ideal for waste-waters of changing characteristics.
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(Amounts expressed in thousands, except share and per share data and unless otherwise stated)
The selected consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive (loss)/income data for years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 set forth below are derived from audited consolidated financial statements of the Company included herein and should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to such financial statements, including the notes thereto and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.” The selected consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income/(loss) data for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 set forth below are derived from audited consolidated financial statements of the Company which are not included herein.
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
US$
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
5,406 |
|
|
|
7,468 |
|
|
|
5,339 |
|
|
|
6,130 |
|
|
|
7,025 |
|
Working capital(1)
|
|
|
5,830 |
|
|
|
5,706 |
|
|
|
5,730 |
|
|
|
6,444 |
|
|
|
8,203 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
23,878 |
|
|
|
24,947 |
|
|
|
23,864 |
|
|
|
25,213 |
|
|
|
26,244 |
|
Short-term debt(2)
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Net assets
|
|
|
17,877 |
|
|
|
17,756 |
|
|
|
17,909 |
|
|
|
18,101 |
|
|
|
18,932 |
|
Capital Stock
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
______________________
(1) Current assets minus current liabilities.
(2) Short-term debt includes short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term bank loans.
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
US$
|
|
Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income/(loss) Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
18,602 |
|
|
|
21,645 |
|
|
|
20,213 |
|
|
|
22,305 |
|
|
|
27,336 |
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
(13,138 |
) |
|
|
(15,480 |
) |
|
|
(15,322 |
) |
|
|
(16,564 |
) |
|
|
(20,876 |
) |
Gross profit
|
|
|
5,464 |
|
|
|
6,165 |
|
|
|
4,891 |
|
|
|
5,741 |
|
|
|
6,460 |
|
Selling and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
(5,719 |
) |
|
|
(6,224 |
) |
|
|
(6,565 |
) |
|
|
(7,119 |
) |
|
|
(6,598 |
) |
Operating loss
|
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(1,674 |
) |
|
|
(1,378 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
Interest Income
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
(Loss)/gain on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
(Loss)/income before taxes
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(1,204 |
) |
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (taxes)/benefit
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of affiliates
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
Net Income/(Loss)
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: net (income)/loss attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
(305 |
) |
Net (loss)/income attributable to the Company
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
(1,087 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss)/income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
337 |
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustments
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Release of translation reserves upon disposal of a subsidiary
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income/(loss)
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
347 |
|
Less: Comprehensive (income)/loss attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to the Company
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
(977 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income per Ordinary Share-Basic
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.21 |
) |
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
(0.52 |
) |
|
|
0.015 |
|
-Diluted
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.21 |
) |
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
(0.51 |
) |
|
|
0.015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Number of Ordinary Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
2,069,223 |
|
|
|
2,070,685 |
|
|
|
2,087,922 |
|
|
|
2,099,894 |
|
|
|
2,114,992 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2,069,223 |
|
|
|
2,076,315 |
|
|
|
2,102,199 |
|
|
|
2,143,375 |
|
|
|
2,163,006 |
|
The Company maintains its books and records in United States dollars (“US$” or “U.S. Dollars”)). Its subsidiaries, retail shops and affiliates maintain their books and records either in US$, Hong Kong dollars (“HK$” or “Hong Kong Dollars”) or in Chinese Renminbi (“RMB” or “Renminbi”).
The Hong Kong dollar is freely convertible into other currencies (including the US dollar). Since 1983, the Hong Kong dollar has effectively been officially linked to the US dollar at the rate of approximately HK$ 7.80 = US$ 1.00. However, the market exchange rate of the Hong Kong dollar against the US dollar continues to be influenced by the forces of supply and demand in the foreign exchange market. Exchange rates between the Hong Kong dollar and other currencies are influenced by the rate between the US dollar and the Hong Kong dollar.
Since 1994, the conversion of Renminbi into foreign currencies, including U.S. dollars, has been based on rates set by the People’s Bank of China, which are set daily based on the previous day’s interbank foreign exchange market rates. From 1994 through 2004, the official exchange rate for the conversion of Renminbi to U.S. dollars was generally stable and maintained at the rate of approximately RMB 8.30 = US$ 1.00. However, from 2009 through 2013, the Renminbi has fluctuated and at the end of 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the exchange rates were approximately, RMB 6.1122 = US$ 1.00, RMB 6.3086 = US$ 1.00, RMB 6.3585 = US$ 1.00, RMB 6.6018 = US$1.00, RMB 6.8282 = US$ 1.00, respectively. The value of the Renminbi fluctuates and is subject to changes in PRC political and economic conditions.
The high, low and average exchange rates are set forth below:
|
|
Rate at Period End
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Average
|
|
US$ to RMB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
6.8282 |
|
|
|
6.7880 |
|
|
|
6.8430 |
|
|
|
6.8409 |
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
6.6018 |
|
|
|
6.6018 |
|
|
|
6.8344 |
|
|
|
6.7696 |
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
6.3585 |
|
|
|
6.3318 |
|
|
|
6.6357 |
|
|
|
6.4640 |
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
|
6.3086 |
|
|
|
6.2289 |
|
|
|
6.3862 |
|
|
|
6.3116 |
|
Fiscal 2013
|
|
|
6.1122 |
|
|
|
6.1084 |
|
|
|
6.3090 |
|
|
|
6.1943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ to HK$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
7.7551 |
|
|
|
7.7474 |
|
|
|
7.7617 |
|
|
|
7.7522 |
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
7.7827 |
|
|
|
7.7507 |
|
|
|
7.8046 |
|
|
|
7.7689 |
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
7.7690 |
|
|
|
7.7640 |
|
|
|
7.8090 |
|
|
|
7.7845 |
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
|
7.7514 |
|
|
|
7.7501 |
|
|
|
7.7688 |
|
|
|
7.7571 |
|
Fiscal 2013
|
|
|
7.7546 |
|
|
|
7.7508 |
|
|
|
7.7651 |
|
|
|
7.7567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Following Months
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Average
|
|
US$ to RMB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2013
|
|
|
6.1698 |
|
|
|
6.1853 |
|
|
|
6.1775 |
|
August 2013
|
|
|
6.1586 |
|
|
|
6.1791 |
|
|
|
6.1647 |
|
September 2013
|
|
|
6.1403 |
|
|
|
6.1696 |
|
|
|
6.1537 |
|
October 2013
|
|
|
6.1211 |
|
|
|
6.1453 |
|
|
|
6.1298 |
|
November 2013
|
|
|
6.1242 |
|
|
|
6.1379 |
|
|
|
6.1311 |
|
December 2013
|
|
|
6.1084 |
|
|
|
6.1296 |
|
|
|
6.1175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ to HK$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2013
|
|
|
7.7537 |
|
|
|
7.7588 |
|
|
|
7.7568 |
|
August 2013
|
|
|
7.7542 |
|
|
|
7.7566 |
|
|
|
7.7554 |
|
September 2013
|
|
|
7.7532 |
|
|
|
7.7558 |
|
|
|
7.7544 |
|
October 2013
|
|
|
7.7527 |
|
|
|
7.7549 |
|
|
|
7.7539 |
|
November 2013
|
|
|
7.7516 |
|
|
|
7.7540 |
|
|
|
7.7525 |
|
December 2013
|
|
|
7.7523 |
|
|
|
7.7552 |
|
|
|
7.7538 |
|
You should carefully consider all of the information set forth in this annual report and the following risk factors. The risks below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks not currently known by us or that we deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely effected by any of these risks. This annual report also contains forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our results could materially differ from those anticipated in these forward looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the risks we face as described below and elsewhere. See “Forward Looking Statements.”
Certain Risks Relating To Doing Business In Hong Kong And The People’s Republic Of China (the “PRC” or “China”).
PRC Sovereignty Over Hong Kong Still Developing.
The Company’s executive and principal offices are located in Hong Kong, a Special Administrative Region of China (or “SAR”; Hong Kong is sometimes herein referred to as the “Hong Kong SAR”).
As provided in the Sino-British Joint Declaration on the Question of Hong Kong (the “Joint Declaration”) and the Basic Law of the Hong Kong SAR of China (the “Basic Law”), the Hong Kong SAR is provided a high degree of autonomy except in foreign and defense affairs. The PRC’s political system and policies are not practiced in Hong Kong. Under this principle of “one country, two systems”, Hong Kong maintains a legal system that is based on common law and is different from that of the PRC.
There appears to be a developing friction between Hong Kong residents pressing for greater democracy and the new government leadership in Beijing. Leadership personnel at Beijing’s liaison office in Hong Kong have been abruptly replaced. The new liaison office director has called for Hong Kong to enact new internal security regulations and vowed resistance to any “foreign forces” that may try to intervene in Hong Kong politics. The formula for the preservation of Hong Kong’s independent legal and economic system under Chinese sovereignty has been referred to as “one country, two systems.” The new liaison office director has been emphasizing the “one country” aspect of the formula stating that China’s sovereignty is always to be respected. There appears to be a deep suspicion that Hong Kong’s democracy advocates are being manipulated by the United States to cause difficulties at China’s doorstep as regional tensions rise, i.e. as China has been asserting territorial claims in the East and South China Seas. The foregoing is raising concerns that civil liberties in Hong Kong may be eroded in the years to come. At this point in time it is not possible to predict if this trend will continue and what effect it will have on the Company, if any.
The Company’s results of operations and financial condition may be influenced by the political situation in Hong Kong and by the general state of the Hong Kong economy. See “ — Economic Stability Uncertain.”
There can be no assurance that these past or any prospective future changes in political, economic or commercial conditions in Hong Kong and the PRC will not result in a material adverse effect upon the Company.
Economic Stability Uncertain.
Most economies in the Far East had suffered from an economic instability. There can be no assurance that there will be a recovery, most especially in light of the recent global economic downturn. Continued growth in the PRC depends on an adequate supply of energy. There is no assurance that adequate supplies of energy can be developed or found to fuel the PRC’s continued economic growth.
The PRC’s Economic, Political And Social Conditions: Slowdown In Growth.
The PRC economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including the amount of government involvement, level of development, growth rate, control of foreign exchange and allocation of resources. While the PRC economy has experienced significant growth in the past thirty years, growth has been uneven, both geographically and among the various sectors of the economy. The PRC government has implemented various measures to encourage economic growth and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures benefit the overall PRC economy, but may also have a negative effect on us. For example, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by changes in applicable tax regulations, rates of currency exchange, inflation and effects to curb inflation.
The PRC economy appears to be moving from a planned economy to a more market-oriented economy. Although the PRC government has implemented measures since the late 1970s emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic reform, the reduction of state ownership of productive assets and the establishment of improved corporate governance in business enterprises, a substantial portion of productive assets in the PRC are still owned by the PRC government. In addition, the PRC government continues to play a significant role in regulating industry development by imposing industrial policies. The PRC government also exercises significant control over the PRC’s economic growth through the allocation of resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. Recently, the PRC government predicted a steep slowdown in growth from a 9.2% GDP in 2011 to a 7.5% GDP in 2012 and plans to lower growth to 7.0% GDP in 2015 with a focus on raising the incomes of the average citizen and seek a national economy less driven by investment and more by consumer demand. Although past predictions have not always proven reliable, if these predictions prove accurate, they, as well as future actions and policies of the PRC government, could suffer a material adverse effect.
Also, financial reporting suggests a real estate “bubble” exists in the PRC. If a real estate “bubble” truly exists in the PRC and it bursts, the PRC’s economy and the Company could suffer a material adverse effect.
The success of the Company’s activities in the PRC depends on the Company’s continued ability to overcome circumstances specifically effecting the industrial sector, including the relatively poor infrastructure, road transportation and communications network and an uncertain legal and regulatory environment.
Economic Reforms May Not Continue Or Impact Positively On The Company; Changing Business Environment.
Over the past several years, the PRC’s government has pursued economic reform policies including encouraging private economic activities and decentralization of economic deregulation. It appears that the PRC government may not continue to pursue these policies or may significantly alter them to our detriment from time to time without notice. Changes in policies by the PRC government resulting in changes in laws, regulations, or their interpretation, or the imposition of confiscatory taxes, restrictions on currency conversion and imports could materially and adversely effect our business and operating results. Recently, the PRC government predicted that its annual growth rate in imports and exports would drop to 10% compared to more than 24% in 2011. The nationalization or other expropriations of private enterprises by the PRC government could result in a loss of our investments in actual funds and time and effort, in China.
The Company’s results at times may also be adversely effected by: (1) changes in political, economic and social conditions in the PRC; (2) changes in government policies such as changes in laws and regulations (or their interpretation); (3) the introduction of additional measures to control inflation; (4) changes in the rate or method of taxation; (5) imposition of additional restrictions on currency conversion remittances abroad; (6) reduction in tariff protection and other import restrictions; and (7) a return to the more centrally-planned economy that existed previously.
We Are Subject To International Economic And Political Risks, Over Which We Have Little Or No Control.
Doing business entirely outside the United States subjects us to various risks, including changing economic and political conditions, exchange controls, currency fluctuations, armed conflicts and unexpected changes in United States and foreign laws relating to tariffs, trade restrictions, transportation regulations, foreign investments and taxation. We have no control over most of these risks and other unforeseeable risks and may be unable to anticipate changes in international economic and political conditions and, therefore, unable to alter our business practice in time to avoid the adverse effect of any of these changes.
The Global Financial Crisis and Economic Conditions May Have A Material Adverse Impact on Our Business and Financial Conditions.
With deteriorating worldwide economies global markets have experienced significant turmoil and upheavals characterized by extreme volatility and the volatility in prices and securities and commodities, diminished credit availability, inability to access capital markets, waves of bankruptcies, high unemployment and declining consumer and business confidence. It appears that the worldwide economic deterioration has negatively impacted our revenue and other results of operation. We cannot predict the short and long-term impact of these events on our business and financial condition that may be materially and adversely affected in the future.
Slowed and Uneven Economic Growth.
The PRC’s economy has experienced significant growth in recent years, but that growth has been uneven among various geographic regions and economic sectors and appears to have slowed. Economic reforms and growth in the PRC have been more successful in certain provinces than in others, and the continuation or increase of such disparities could adversely affect political or social stability. The PRC’s economy experienced a slowdown beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of the global economic crisis. There can be no assurance that the PRC’s economy will grow, that if there is growth, such growth will be steady and uniform. The slowdown has had a negative effect on our business.
PRC Inflation.
In recent years, the PRC has not experienced significant inflation, and thus inflation has not had a significant effect on our business historically. In response to the increased inflation rate during 2004, the Chinese government announced measures to restrict lending and investment in the PRC in order to reduce inflationary pressure on the PRC’s economy; and the inflation rate was reduced in 2005 and 2006, escalated in 2007 and 2008 at a rate of 5.9%, was reduced by 0.7% in 2009 and increased by 3.3%, 5.4%, 2.6% and 2.6% in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. Efforts by the PRC to curb inflation may also curb economic growth, increase our overhead costs and adversely affect our sales. Inflationary increases cause a corresponding increase in our general overhead. If the PRC rate of inflation continues to increases, the Chinese government may introduce further measures intended to reduce the inflation rate in the PRC. Any such measures adopted by the Chinese government may not be successful in reducing or slowing the increase in the PRC’s inflation rate. A sustained or increased inflation in the PRC may have an adverse impact on the PRC’s economy and may materially and adversely affect our business and financial results.
Uncertain Legal System And Application Of Laws.
The legislative trend in the PRC over the past decade has been to enhance the protection afforded to foreign investment and allow for more active control by foreign parties of foreign invested enterprises. This may not continue. In addition, as the PRC economy, business and commercial framework and legal system all continue to develop, that development may adversely affect the Company’s activities in the PRC or the ability of the Company to enter into Sino-foreign agreements.
PRC Legal System Business Laws Developing.
The PRC does not yet possess a comprehensive body of business law or a consolidated body of laws governing foreign investment enterprises. As a result, the enforcement, interpretation and implementation of existing laws, regulations or agreements may be sporadic, inconsistent and subject to considerable discretion. The PRC’s judiciary has not had sufficient opportunity to gain experience in enforcing laws that exist, leading to a higher than usual degree of uncertainty as to the outcome of any litigation. As the legal system develops, entities such as the Company may be adversely affected by new laws, changes to existing laws (or interpretations thereof) and preemption of provincial or local laws by national laws. Even when adequate law exists in the PRC, it may not be possible to obtain speedy and equitable enforcement of the law.
Government Currency Controls.
The PRC government imposes control over its foreign currency reserves in part through direct regulation of the conversion of its currency, Renminbi into foreign exchange and through restrictions on foreign imports. The conversion of RMB into Hong Kong Dollars and U.S. Dollars must be based on rates set by the People’s Bank of China, which rates are set daily based on the previous day’s Chinese interbank foreign exchange market rate with reference to current exchange rates on the world financial markets.
Currently, the RMB is permitted to fluctuate within a narrow band against the U.S. Dollar. Exchange rate fluctuations may adversely affect the Company because of increases in overhead costs, adverse effects on sales, foreign currency denominated liabilities, and may materially adversely affect the value, translated into U.S. dollars, of the Company’s net fixed assets situated and to be situated in the PRC, earnings and dividends.
Foreign Currency Risk.
The Company operates in Hong Kong, the PRC and trades with both local and overseas customers, and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency exposures, primarily with respect to purchases in, Hong Kong dollar, Renminbi, US dollars, the Japanese yen and Euro. Foreign exchange risk arises from committed and unmatched future commercial transactions, such as confirmed import purchase orders and sales orders, recognized assets and liabilities, and net investment in the PRC operations. The Company uses derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange contracts to hedge certain foreign currency exposures but does not currently adequately hedge its foreign exchange positions. There can be no assurances that the Company’s hedging strategies will be adequate to avoid this foreign exchange risk.
Turbulent Relations With The United States Of America (“United States”).
Differences between the United States and PRC governments on some political issues continue occasionally to color their relationship. These occasional controversies could materially and adversely affect our business and operations. Political or trade friction between the two countries could also materially and adversely affect the market price of our Ordinary Shares, whether or not they adversely affect our business.
Certain Risks Relating To The Company’s Business
Decline in Revenues; Operating Loss; Loss Before Income Taxes.
In Fiscal 2008, the Company had revenues of approximately US$ 31,738, 000, operating income of approximately US$ 370,000 and income before income taxes of approximately US$ 560,000. Since Fiscal 2008, the Company’s revenues have continued to decline and its losses have increased. The Company primarily attributes the revenue reduction, operating loss and loss before income taxes to the global economic downturn and having key suppliers selling their products through China suppliers other than the Company. Exacerbating these losses in Fiscal 2010 was the further inclination of key suppliers selling their products other than through the Company and the delay of site readiness of several waste water treatment contracts including one site delayed by a fatal traffic accident. A major portion of the operating loss for Fiscal 2011 was principally from Yixing Pact Environmental Technology Company Limited and Pact Asia Pacific Limited for the amount of approximately US$932,000 as a result of loss of approximately US$632,000 for its joint venture and research and development expenses of approximately US$193,000 incurred for its ballast water treatment system (“BWTS”). During Fiscal 2012, the Company had revenues of approximately US$21,645,000, an operating loss of approximately US$59,000 and a profit before income tax of approximately US$13,000. The principal reason for the operating loss for Fiscal 2012 was research and development expenses of approximately US$930,000 incurred for its BWTS. During Fiscal 2013, the Company had revenues of approximately US$18,602,000, an operating loss of approximately US$255,000 and a loss before income tax of approximately US$157,000. The principal reason for the operating loss for Fiscal 2013 was the drop in sales revenue from engineering activities as a result of competition from companies offering similar services, that we believe to be of lower quality than our services, at lower prices.
We also believe that we are entering difficulties in the PRC in obtaining certain new customers for our products and services as these potential new customers appear reluctant to separate from their current service providers and sellers.
As the global economic downturn appears to be continuing, showing only modest positive economic improvement and the Company may face further competition by having key suppliers selling their products through China suppliers other than the Company, there can be no assurance that the Company’s revenues will not decline further and losses will not increase.
Future Plans To Increase Revenue; Decrease Losses and Return To Profitability Uncertain.
The Company has been attempting to stem the decline in revenue by streamlining its activities. The Company has reduced its staff, consolidated offices and is trying to improve staff efficiencies. To date this has not been successful but the Company plans to continue these economizing efforts. Also, land based tests were passed by the Company, sea based tests are in progress and the Company expects to obtain formal certification in approximately mid 2014 from China’s Classification Society and if all is successful, the Company hopes to receive revenues from orders to retrofit and install its ballast water treatment process into ocean going vessels. There can be no assurance that continuing its streamlining efforts and its testing of its ballast water treatment process will be successful or, if successful, that the process will result in significant revenues to the Company. Even if the Company builds a market for a product or service, the research and development and marketing of that product or service will result in losses to the Company for a significant period of time, even if that product or service ultimately becomes profitable. Also, we have developed products that have resulted in nominal sales or that we have been unable to market to date. There can be no assurance that products, if any, that we develop in the future, will not have similar results with the time, effort and expense used to develop any such products having a negative impact on the Company.
We Have Made And May Make Further Acquisitions Without Your Approval.
Although we endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in any particular acquisition, there can be no assurance that we will properly or accurately ascertain all such risks. We will have virtually unrestricted flexibility in identifying and selecting prospective acquisition candidates and in deciding if they should be acquired for cash, equity or debt, and in what combination of cash, equity and/or debt.
We have taken and are seeking to take equity positions in related businesses. We will not seek stockholder approval for any additional acquisitions unless required by applicable law and regulations. Our stockholders will not have an opportunity to review financial and other information on acquisition candidates prior to consummation of any acquisitions under almost all circumstances.
Investors will be relying upon our management, upon whose judgment the investor must depend, with only limited information concerning management’s specific intentions.
There can be no assurance that the Company will locate and successfully complete any such additional acquisitions, or any acquisition will perform as anticipated, will not result in significant unexpected liabilities or will ever contribute significant revenues or profits to the Company or that the Company will not lose its entire investment in any acquisition.
Dependence Upon Management.
The Company is dependent upon the services of its executive officers, in particular Mr. T.C. Leung, the Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors and its Chief Executive Officer. The business of the Company could be adversely effected by the loss of services of, or a material reduction in the amount of time devoted to the Company by its executive officers. The Company does not maintain “Key Man” life insurance on the lives of any of its officers and directors. See Item 6. “Directors, Senior Management and Employees.”
Adverse Impact Upon The Company Of PRC’s Credit Restrictions.
The Company faces increasing competition from other distributors of substantially similar products and manufacturers themselves, both foreign and Chinese. The Company faces its principal competition from foreign manufacturers and other distributors of their products situated in Hong Kong and the PRC. Competition may cause purchaser demands for price reductions and reduced profit margin.
Competition With Vendors.
As the Company assembles products of the kind that it presently distributes, the Company may directly compete with certain of its vendors. Any such direct competition may adversely affect its relationship with its vendors. See Item 4. “Information on the Company.”
Dependence On Vendors: Lack of Long Term Arrangements: Loss of Vendors.
The Company distributes supplies manufactured by a number of vendors, including, Thermo Fisher Scientific Group (“Thermo”), Biotage Sweden AB (“Biotage”), Hach Company-Lachat Instruments (“Hach”), and Stanford Research Systems, Inc. (“Stanford”), that are the Company’s largest suppliers, pursuant to short term arrangements. Although alternative sources of supply exist, there can be no assurance that the termination of the Company’s relationship with any of the above or other vendors would not have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations due to the Company’s dependence on these vendors. A substantial number of the Company’s suppliers have been selling their products into China directly and through other distributors. During Fiscal 2011, our sales revenue from trading activities decreased by approximately 17% as a result of a loss of vendors. During Fiscal 2012, our sales revenue from trading activities slightly decreased by approximately 5% but no significant vendors were lost. A loss of a substantial vendor or substantial number of our other vendors and/or our competing with them would have a material adverse effect on our revenues from trading activities. During Fiscal 2013, our sales revenue from trading activities slightly increased by approximately 2%.
Risks Relating To the Company Itself; Control By T.C. Leung; Potential Conflict Of Interests.
T.C. Leung, the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, as a practical matter, is able to nominate and cause the election of all the members of the Company’s Board of Directors, control the appointment of its officers and the day-to-day affairs and management of the Company. As a consequence, Mr. Leung can have the Company managed in a manner that would be in his own interests and not in the interests of the other shareholders of the Company. See Item 6. “Directors, Senior Management and Employees” and Item 7. “Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”
Certain Legal Consequences of Incorporation In The British Virgin Islands; Rights Of Shareholders Not As Extensive As In U.S. Corporations.
Principles of British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) corporate law relating to such matters as the validity of the Company procedures, the fiduciary duties of management and the rights of the Company’s shareholders may differ from those that would apply if the Company were incorporated in a jurisdiction within the United States.
The rights of shareholders under BVI law are not as extensive as the rights of shareholders under legislation or judicial precedent in many United States jurisdictions. Under United States law, majority and controlling shareholders generally have certain “fiduciary” responsibilities to the minority shareholders. United States shareholder action must be taken in good faith and actions by controlling shareholders in a United States jurisdiction and executive compensation which are obviously unreasonable may be declared null and void.
The BVI law protecting the interests of the minority shareholders is not as protective in all circumstances as the law protecting minority shareholders in United States jurisdictions. The shareholders of the Company may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions by the Company’s Board of Directors, and may have more limited rights, than they might have as shareholders of a company incorporated in many United States jurisdictions.
Anti-Takeover Provisions.
The Company has 5,000,000 shares of “blank check preferred stock” authorized. The “blank check preferred stock” is intended to strengthen the Company’s ability to resist an unsolicited takeover bid and may be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect. The Board of Directors has the right to fix the rights, terms and preferences at the time of issue of “blank check preferred stock” without further action by our shareholders.
Uncertainty Of Enforcing United States Judgments.
There is some uncertainty whether BVI courts would enforce judgments of the courts of the United States and of other foreign jurisdictions, or enforce actions brought in the BVI which are based upon the securities laws of the United States. A final monetary judgment obtained in the United States will be treated as a cause of action in itself by the BVI courts so that no retrial of the issues would be necessary, provided that material preconditions are met and the proceedings pursuant to which judgment was obtained were not contrary to the rules of natural justice.
All of the Company’s directors and executive officers reside outside of the United States, service of process upon the Company and such persons may be difficult to effect in the United States upon all such directors and officers.
All of the Company’s assets are and will be located outside of the United States, in Hong Kong and the PRC, and any judgment obtained in the United States may not be enforced in those jurisdictions. Hong Kong courts will not directly enforce against the Company or such persons judgments obtained in the United States. There is also substantial doubt as to the enforceability in the PRC of actions to enforce judgments of the United States’ courts arising out of or based on the ownership of the securities, including judgments arising out of or based on the civil liability provisions of United States federal or state securities laws or otherwise. See “— Certain Legal Consequences of Incorporation in the British Virgin Islands; Rights of Shareholders not as Extensive as in U.S. Corporations.”
Being A Foreign Private Issuer Exempts Us From Certain SEC And NASDAQ QMX (“NASDAQ”) Requirements.
We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). As such, with certain limitations, we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to United States public companies including: (1) the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the Commission of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or current reports on Form 8-K; (2) the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act; (3) the provisions of Regulation FD aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information; and (4) the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and establishing insider liability for profits realized from any “short-swing” trading transaction (i.e., a purchase and sale, or sale and purchase, of the issuer’s equity securities within less than six months). Because of these exemptions, investors are not afforded the same protections or information generally available to investors holding shares in public companies organized in the United States.
Our Securities Must Continue To Meet Qualitative And Quantitative Listing Maintenance Criteria For NASDAQ: Recent Deficiency Cured.
Our securities are quoted and traded on NASDAQ. There can be no assurance that we will continue to meet both the qualitative and quantitative criteria for continued quotation and trading of our securities on NASDAQ. One of NASDAQ’s listing requirements is the maintenance of a closing bid price of US$ 1.00 per share. During periods of time in 2008 and 2009 the Company was not in compliance with that requirement but NASDAQ had generally suspended that requirement and others due to market conditions and/or the US$1.00 per share bid price was not met for a sufficient period of time to cause a NASDAQ deficiency action.
On September 20, 2011, the Company received a deficiency letter from NASDAQ that the Company was no longer in compliance with NASDAQ’s listing maintenance rule for failing to have a bid price of at least US$ 1.00 per share for the prior thirty trading days. In order to regain compliance, in January 2012, the Company effected a combination or reverse stock split of its issued Ordinary Shares. On February 1, 2012, the Company received a letter from NASDAQ advising that as the bid price for the Company’s Ordinary Shares had risen above US$ 1.00 for the required period of time, the Company was in compliance with NASDAQ’s maintenance listing requirements.
On April 15, 2014, the closing price of the Company’s Ordinary Shares was US$4.2114. If we are unable to meet the continued quotation criteria of NASDAQ and are suspended from trading on these markets, our securities could possibly be traded in the over-the-counter market and be quoted in the so-called “pink sheets” or, if then available, the OTC Bulletin Board. In such an event, an investor would likely find it more difficult to dispose of, or even obtain accurate quotations of, our securities. See “We Are Also Required To Meet Certain, But Not All Corporate Governance Criteria Applicable to NASDAQ Listed Issuers.”
We Are Also Required To Meet Certain, But Not All, Corporate Governance Criteria Applicable To NASDAQ Listed Issuers.
Although, in the past, we have been able to satisfy corporate governance criteria applicable to NASDAQ, those criteria are difficult to comply with and include, among other things: (a) a heightened degree of independence of members of the board of directors with independent directors to, among other things: hold regular meetings among themselves only; (b) establishment of a code of conduct addressing compliance with laws; and (c) a limit on payments to independent directors and their family members (other than for services on the board of directors).
These corporate governance requirements and a strict definition of “independent director” make it more difficult to find independent directors for our Board of Directors. There is intense competition for qualified independent directors, including those persons with accounting experience and financial statement acumen to serve on audit committees. We believe that continued compliance with the corporate governance requirements applicable to NASDAQ listed issuers may be difficult and increase our costs and expenses as the costs of finding and compensating independent directors escalate and the costs of administering their new powers and responsibilities is an added financial burden. If we are unable to attract and keep a sufficient number of independent directors willing to take on the responsibilities imposed by such rules on what we believe to be commercially reasonable terms, our securities may be delisted from NASDAQ. (See “Being a ‘Controlled Company’ Exempts Us From Certain Other Corporate Governance Criteria Applicable to NASDAQ Listed Issuers.”)
Being A “Controlled Company” Exempts Us From Certain Other Corporate Governance Criteria Applicable To NASDAQ Listed Issuers.
As a result of T.C. Leung, the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer beneficially owning the majority voting power of our Ordinary Shares, we are a “controlled company” as that term is defined in rules and regulations applicable to NASDAQ listed issuers. As a “controlled company”, we are not required to comply with certain NASDAQ corporate governance criteria including, among other things, the requirements that the majority of our Board be independent directors, and their having the authority to approve director nominations and executive officer compensation.
We Are Not Subject To Various Corporate Governance Measures, Which May Result In Shareholders Having Limited Protections.
Recent Federal legislation, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”), has resulted in the adoption of various corporate governance measures by securities exchanges and NASDAQ designed to promote the integrity of the corporate management and the securities markets. Being a “controlled company,” we are exempt from many, but not all, of those requirements. Furthermore, the absence of such practices with respect to our Company may leave our shareholders without protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters.
We May Be Exposed To Potential Risks Relating To Our Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting.
Pursuant to Section 404 of SOX, the SEC adopted rules requiring public companies to include a report of management on the company’s internal controls over financial reporting in their annual reports, including Form 20-F.
We expend significant resources in developing and maintaining the necessary documentation and testing procedures required by SOX, there is a risk that we will not maintain compliance with all of these requirements.
In the event we identify significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal controls that we cannot remediate in a timely manner our ability to obtain equity or debt financing could suffer and the market price of our shares could decline.
The Market Price Of Our Securities Has Been Fluctuating Widely.
During the past several years, the market price of our Ordinary Shares has fluctuated widely on occasion. Except for the price declines that the Company attributes to the current global economic downturn, the Company knows of no reason for these wide fluctuations. See Item 9.C- “Markets.”
There Are Risks In Purchasing Low-Priced Securities.
If our securities were to be suspended or delisted from NASDAQ, they could be subject to rules under the Exchange Act which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established clients and “accredited investors”. For transactions covered by such rules, a broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination of the purchaser and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the sale. Consequently, such rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability to sell any of our securities in any secondary market that may develop for such securities. In the event our securities are no longer listed on NASDAQ or are not otherwise exempt from the provisions of the SEC’s “penny stock” rules, such rules may also affect the ability of broker-dealers and investors to sell our securities.
There Is No Assurance Of A Continued Public Market For Our Securities.
There can be no assurance that a trading market for our Ordinary Shares will continue.
We May Be Considered To Be A Passive Foreign Investment Company For The 2013 Calendar Year And May Be A Passive Foreign Investment Company For Future Years, Which Would Result In Adverse U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences To U.S. Holders Of Our Ordinary Shares.
A non-U.S. corporation will be considered a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for U.S. income tax purposes, for any taxable year if either (i) at least 75% of its gross income is passive income or (ii) at least 50% of the value of its assets (based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets during a taxable year) is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. The annual PFIC determination to be made by a U.S. holder of our ordinary shares is an inherently factual determination and there is limited guidance regarding the application of the PFIC rules to specific situations. We currently hold a substantial amount of cash and cash equivalents, and investments in PRC enterprises, and the value of our goodwill and other assets may be based in part on the market price of our ordinary shares, which has experienced significant fluctuations. Although the determination of PFIC status is subject to factual uncertainties because it depends upon the valuation of our ordinary shares, as well as our goodwill and other assets and income, we are uncertain if we would be considered to be a PFIC for 2013. In addition, as the determination of PFIC status is made on an annual basis and depends on variables over which we have limited control, there can be no assurance that we will not be a PFIC for 2013 or any future years. If we are a PFIC in any year, U.S. Holders will be subject to certain adverse United States federal income tax consequences, and are urged to consult with his or her tax advisor. See “ Item 10 Taxation—United States Federal Income Taxation .”
If we become directly subject to the recent scrutiny involving U.S.-listed Chinese companies, we may have to expend significant resources to investigate and/or defend the matter, which could harm our business operations, stock price and reputation and could result in a complete loss of your investment in us.
U.S. public companies that have substantial operations in China have been the subject of intense scrutiny by investors, financial commentators and regulatory agencies. Much of the scrutiny has centered around financial and accounting irregularities and mistakes, a lack of effective internal controls over financial reporting and, in many cases, allegations of fraud. As a result of the scrutiny, the publicly traded stock of many U.S. listed China-based companies that have been the subject of such scrutiny has sharply decreased in value. Many of these companies are now subject to shareholder lawsuits and/or SEC enforcement actions that are conducting internal and/or external investigations into the allegations. If we become the subject of any unwarranted scrutiny, even allegations that are not true, we may have to expend significant resources to investigate such allegations and/or defend the Company. Such investigations or allegations will be costly and time-consuming and distract our management from our business plan and could result in our reputation being harmed and our stock price could decline as a result of such allegations, regardless of the truthfulness of the allegations.
|
INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
|
|
HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY
|
The Company was organized under the laws of the BVI on September 30, 1996 for the purposes of raising capital and for acquiring all the outstanding capital stock of Euro Tech (Far East) Limited, a Hong Kong corporation involved in the distribution of advanced water treatment equipment (“Far East”). In March 1997, the Company acquired all the issued and outstanding capital stock of Far East and it became a wholly-owned subsidiary and was the primary operational entity of the Company.
During Fiscal 2005, we completed our plan to increase our equity position in Yixing Pact Environmental Technology Company Limited (“Yixing”) and Pact Asia Pacific Limited (“Pact”, collectively with “Yixing”, the “Pact-Yixing”), companies engaged in water and waste-water treatment solution business. We had previously owned thirty (30%) percent of their capital stock. With the addition of twenty-one (21%) percent of Pact-Yixing’s capital stock in October 2005, they became our majority-owned subsidiaries. In January 2010, we acquired an additional two percent (2%) interest in Pact-Yixing, increasing our ownership to fifty-three (53%) percent of Pact-Yixing. The foregoing purchases of Pact-Yixing were made from Tamworth Industrial Limited (“Tamworth”). In July 2011, we acquired additional 5% equity interests in Pact-Yixing for a total consideration of approximately US$ 234,000 from Tamworth.
Pact-Yixing, situated in Shanghai, specialize in the design, manufacture and operation of water and waste-water treatment plants in several industries situated in China. Pact-Yixing, through associates and business alliances, also conduct similar operations in the Middle East.
In November of 2006 we established Shanghai Euro Tech Environmental Engineering Company Ltd. (“Shanghai — Environmental”) as a wholly-owned subsidiary under the laws of the PRC, to carry on our environmental engineering department with that line of business and its personnel transferred from our subsidiary, Euro Tech (Far East) Ltd. Shanghai — Environmental is focusing on our water and waste-water treatment engineering business. We are scaling down this company as we have a 58% equity interest in Pact-Yixing that operates similar business activities to avoid duplication of costs and efforts.
China’s rapid economic growth had led it to become one of the world’s largest emitters of sulfur dioxide. The damage due to acid rain caused by sulfur dioxide is vast, and is also affecting the neighboring countries as air currents transport sulfur dioxide. To tackle these environmental and geo-political issues, China has established targets to reduce key pollutants, namely, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and suspended particulates. Heavy polluters are being warned to reduce their emissions or face penalties. We believe that as a result, the demand of desulphurization and dust removal equipment will increase accordingly.
In August 2007, Far East acquired a 20% equity interest in Zhejiang Tianlan Environmental Protection Technology Company Limited (“Blue Sky”), founded in 2000, for approximately US$4,648,000. Blue Sky provides design and general contracting services, equipment manufacturing, installation, testing and operation management for the purification treatment of industrial waste gases (specifically as desulphurization, flue gas de-nitration, dust removal) emitted from various boilers and industrial furnaces of power plants, steelworks and chemical plants. By securing an equity stake in Blue Sky’s business, we have a strategic partner to work within China’s environmental protection business. With Blue Sky’s technology and technical support, we believe we are able to provide services and environmental solutions not only for water and waste-water treatment but also for air pollution control for industrial clients in China. Blue Sky's revenue and net income have steadily increased during Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2011. During Fiscal 2012, Blue Sky’s sales orders increased by 27%. However, the delay in implementation of some major projects resulted in decrease in revenues and net incomes.
In January 2008, we acquired a 20% equity interest in Zhejiang Jia Huan Electronic Co. Ltd., (“Jia Huan”) for approximately US$2,610,000. Jia Huan has been in the environmental protection business since 1969. Approximately 95% of Jia Huan’s business is related to air pollution control and less than 5% is related to water and wastewater treatment. Jia Huan designs and manufactures automatic control systems and electric voltage control equipment for electrostatic precipitators which are used as air purification equipment for power plants, cement plants and incinerators to remove and collect dust and pollutants from exhaust stacks.
In Fiscal 2013, Blue Sky and Jia Huan made income contribution of approximately US$250,000 and US$75,000, respectively, to the Company. According to publicly available news reports, the PRC’s Premier opened that country’s annual Parliament meeting and declared war on pollution and the PRC’s National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”), the PRC’s economic planner reported that new guidelines would be issued on relocating key industries away from urban centers to help tackle smog. The NDRC said it would seek to ensure that polluters pay by establishing a new mechanism to compensate victims of environmental damage and hold local officials accountable. We hope that the foregoing will benefit these two affiliates.
The Company had been primarily a distributor of a wide range of advanced water treatment equipment, laboratory instruments, analyzers, test kits and related supplies and power generation equipment (including recorders and power quality analyzers). The Company acts as an exclusive and non-exclusive distributor for well-known manufacturers of such equipment, primarily to commercial customers and governmental agencies or instrumentalities in Hong Kong and the PRC.
The Company distributes products through its Hong Kong headquarters, its trading companies and representative offices in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Chongqing, Xi´An, Shenyang, and Urumqi.
Laboratory instruments, analyzers and test kits are used to analyze the chemical content and ascertain the level of impurities or other contaminants in water. The Company distributes analytical re-agents and chemicals to support testing systems of laboratory and portable instruments, process analyzers and portable test kits and assist in the analysis process. The Company offers a wide variety of test kits to test water quality. The Company believes that these portable test kits are easy to use and preadapted for rugged field use. These test kits are used to monitor drinking water distribution systems.
Laboratory and portable instruments generally consist of analytical instruments including, but not limited to the following: spectrophotometers, colorimeters, turbidimeters, ion-selective electrodes, chemical oxygen demand apparati, digestion apparati, and precision re-agent dispensing devices which are used to test and monitor impurities and contaminants in water systems. See “Glossary.”
The Company also distributes continuous-reading process analyzers, process turbidimeters, pH controllers and analyzer accessories. These products are generally used to monitor and control drinking water quality to ensure that water treatment procedures comply with regulatory standards. See “Glossary.”
To allow the Company to bid on larger water, waste-water and power generation projects, we acquired Pact-Yixing. The Company believes that the Pact-Yixing business is complementary to the Company’s business as the Company expects to have a competitive advantage by offering customers and potential customers not only hardware but solutions to engineering problems as well.
Pact-Yixing have completed a substantial number of industrial water and waste-water treatment projects in the PRC. The majority of these projects are for large multinational manufacturing facilities for clients from the USA, Europe and Japan. Process design as well as mechanical and electrical engineering are completed in-house and manufacturing contracted to approved fabricators of components. Fabrication drawings are also done in-house for submittal to said fabricators under the supervision of Pact-Yixing’s quality control engineers.
Pact-Yixing clients cover a varied spectrum of industries covering semiconductor, pharmaceutical, petrochemicals, auto and auto parts, steel, food and beverage and beauty products. For example, in February 2010, Pact entered into an agreement with a stainless steel manufacturer providing for an aggregate of up to US$3,800,000 for the engineering, design, supply, equipping, installation, personnel training and commissioning of waste water treatment, direct water cooling, indirect cooling tower water, potable water treatment and industrial water treatment systems in Jiangsu, China. The systems were completed as of December 31, 2011 and the contract price was fully paid.
The water and waste-water treatment processes applied at Pact-Yixing cover chemical, physical, biological and membrane separation. A combination of those processes are normally used to treat a specific industrial process feed or effluent. With respect to the water treatment side of Pact-Yixing’s business, they design and build filtration equipment, ion-exchange softeners and demineralizers, reverse osmosis, electro-deionization, chemical treatment systems and package type mobile water treatment plants. As for waste-water treatment, Pact-Yixing design and build biological treatment systems, oil coalescers, dissolved air flotation, lamella clarifiers, chemical reactor tanks, ultrafiltration, microfiltration, dewatering systems and package type mobile sewage treatment plants. Biological treatment plants cover both aerobic and anaerobic processes. State-of-the-art aerobic processes of SBR (sequential batch reactors) and MBR (membrane biological reactors) are technologies also covered by Pact-Yixing. See “Glossary.”
In 2006, Pact-Yixing commenced selling water and waste-water treatment equipment. Pact and Engineering FZC (“PACTFZC”), a Middle Eastern water treatment company based in Dubai, and a third party formed a joint venture (the “JV”). Pact invested US$300,000 and has a 60% controlling interest of the JV, PACTFZC, majority owned by George Hayek, the Company’s Managing Director and a third party each invested US$100,000 in consideration for 20% interests. In December 2011, the partners of the JV decided to close the JV due to an unsatisfactory return on their investment. The JV had an operating loss of approximately US$632,000 in Fiscal 2011 as a result of expenses resulting from the liquidation of the JV, such as severance payments and impairment of inventory. The JV was liquidated and its business has been taken over by Pact-Yixing.
We continue the process of shifting our emphasis from the distribution of instruments and equipment to engineering and manufacturing activities. Revenues from our trading activities have fallen-off as a substantial number of our suppliers have been selling their products into China directly and through other distributors. Many of these other distributors are local Chinese companies and can operate with a lower overhead. In Fiscal 2008, revenues and net income generated from our environmental engineering department and our majority owned subsidiaries, Pact-Yixing (companies engaged in the water and waste water treatment solution business), more than offset our falling trading revenues.
In Fiscal 2009, that was no longer the case as Pact-Yixing’s revenues declined as a result of the global economic downturn. During Fiscal 2010, trading revenue substantially declined. In response, the Company began streamlining operations and further restructured the Company from a trading orientation to manufacturing and engineering activities. Non-profitable or non-strategic retail shops and representative office were closed with consequent cut in staff to focus on trading activity in Hong Kong, Macau and Guangdong.
A fatal traffic accident in September 2010 disrupted the progress of a contract from a petrochemical industrial park for the Company to design, supply, install and commission an industrial wastewater treatment system in Guangxi, China and other engineering activities and business opportunities. Five people died, including two members of our project management team and an employee of a civil engineering sub-contractor. The Company drew employees from other projects and hired a new sub-contractor. Drawing personnel from other projects delayed those projects as well. Lastly, several waste water treatment projects were delayed as a result of site preparation short comings by the owners. All these factors had a substantive negative impact on the Company’s financial results of operations for Fiscal 2010. The loss to the Company resulting from the traffic accident cannot be financially quantified.
During Fiscal 2011, revenues from trading activities continued to decline as we continued to lose the right to distribute products, such as Siemens’ products. We mainly sold Siemens’ water treatment products to Hong Kong’s government water supply agency. Our agreement with Siemens terminated at the end of September 2010 and this product loss was the major factor in our Hong Kong sales decline. Anticipating the potential for such losses we had starting economizing by reducing staff, consolidating offices (as early as 2010) while attempting to improve staff productivity. Also revenue from Pact-Yixing declined in 2011 while it experienced a high rate of staff turnover and unfavorable economic conditions caused by the decrease in sales contracts from multinational companies as a result of the European sovereign debt crisis. Engineering expenses increased by US$0.6 million primarily due to the approximately US$ 301,000 expended on the liquidation of the JV. Additionally, approximately US$ 193,000 was utilized for research and development for the BWTS. The foregoing factors had a substantive negative impact on the Company’s Fiscal 2011 financial results of operations.
During Fiscal 2012, there was no loss of major products distribution right, revenues from trading activities slightly declined but the gross profit remained the same as Fiscal 2011. Due to our continuous efforts in economizing by cutting staff, consolidating offices (as early as 2010) while attempting to improve staff productivity, our operating loss from trading activities decreased. Revenue from Pact-Yixing increased in 2012 resulted in operating profit from engineering activities even though approximately US$ 930,000 was utilized for research and development expenses for the BWTS. In Fiscal 2012, the general manager left and during that year and Fiscal 2013 there was no significant sales contracts received for Shanghai — Environmental and we intend to phase out this company due to the duplication of its business activities with Pact-Yixing.
During Fiscal 2013, there were no major changes in revenues from trading activities. Revenue from Pact-Yixing decreased in 2013 resulting in decrease in operating profit from engineering activities of approximately US$ 295,000.
Our Strategy for 2014
We are focusing our trading activities in Hong Kong, Macau and Guangdong under a more productive operation. These cities are located close to our Hong Kong headquarters, our customers are more concentrated in these cities rendering customer support easier while incurring less travel expenses and while supporting distributorships in these cities as opposed to distributorships throughout China. We will continue our efforts to control costs to enhance operational efficiency. At the same time we will place greater focus at the manufacturing level on the chemical reagent business that the Company believes is very profitable and easier to sell. These chemical reagents are manufactured in our plant in Shanghai. These reagents include but are not limited to COD analyzers, fine carbon tetrachloride, total nitrogen and free chlorine. These reagents are used by water and used by water and wastewater treatment plants and other industries such as beverage, as consumables by water and wastewater treatment plants, consumables with the water analyzers to monitor the quality of the water/ discharged water. Our existing distribution network for these products, is not that effective, we experienced no significant increase in sales for same in Fiscal 2013 and plan to seek new distribution channels in Fiscal 2014. Also, during the 1st Quarter of Fiscal 2013, we received three engineering contracts worth about US$ 2.3 million from two foreign companies outside China and one company in China and we feel positive about our ability to expand our worldwide customer base by working closely and actively with some international engineering companies because of Pact-Yixing’s competitive prices and the high quality of its services. Two of said contracts were completed in Fiscal 2013 and the remaining one contract is expected to be completed in the first half of Fiscal 2014. We will look for opportunities for Shanghai — Environmental to co-operate with Pact-Yixing to generate a synergy effect. We have been investing significant portion of our resources to developing our BWTS for the global market and expects the new BWTS business will generate revenues for coming years of which no assurance can be given. We will also explore the opportunities for wastewater treatment for fracking water in oil and gas industry.
Product Distribution and Other Services
Scientific Instruments. The Company distributes analytical instruments, environmental quality monitoring instruments, sample pre-treatment equipment and general purpose laboratory instruments. Analytical instruments include, but are not limited to, chromatographs, mass spectrometers, flow injector analyzers, automated sample preparation workstations and atomic spectrometers. Environmental monitoring instruments include both air and water quality monitoring instruments. Air quality monitoring instruments are generally divided into those which monitor ambient (i.e., atmospheric) air, and those which monitor pollution sources. The revenue from sales of air quality monitoring instruments is nominal as the Company has not been able to acquire a distributorship for air quality instruments from brand name manufactures that we believe engage in direct customer sales or rely on their existing distributors. Sample pre-treatment equipment are used to clean-up the sample prior to chemical analysis for checking pesticides and drug residues in food. Additionally, the Company offers general purpose laboratory instruments including a variety of water quality monitoring and analysis equipment, such as continuous reading process analyzers, process turbidimeters, pH controllers, and test kits for monitoring chemical content in water (i.e., chlorine, fluorides, etc.). See “Glossary.”
Customers for the analytical instruments include government agencies, academic and research institutions, major laboratories and beverage producers, including analytical system to the Hong Kong Government Laboratory for analysis of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and pesticides in the environment. Customers for water quality monitoring instruments also include government agencies. Customers for sample pre-treatment equipment are mainly different laboratories of major cities under the Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine in the PRC. The Company derived approximately 59.1%, 55.3% and 54.4% of its revenues from the sale of scientific instruments during Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively.
Power Solutions and Process Automation Products. The Company distributes general testing and measuring equipment including multi-channel digital and analogue recorders, signal amplifiers and calibration equipment for energy conservation, renewable energy equipment, power quality analyzers, continuous emissions monitoring systems and air pollution control systems to industries including power plants, railway and aero-space industries, utilities, educational institutions and telecommunications companies.
The Company also provides process control systems specifically designed for the industrial needs of clients including sensors, temperature gauges, pressure gauges, power and energy consumption meters, flow meters, valves, temperature and pressure transmitters and control devices, temperature and pressure calibrators, moisture, power, energy and harmonic analyzers. Customers for the foregoing distributed products include government water supply agencies, water treatment facilities, power and electric companies, petrochemical plants and instrument manufacturers.
In conjunction with the distribution of products such as programmable logic controllers, telemetry units and SCADA systems and software, the Company also provides systems engineering to government agencies, waste-water treatment and power generation plants and beverage producers. Specific services provided include automated control system design, the operation and management of various waste-water, water and power generation projects. We endeavor to introduce, develop, and promote new and advanced technologies, products, and appropriate technical developments from abroad. We have also been cooperating with established technology companies and engage in systems and special projects in Programmable Logic Control, Telemetry unit, SCADA systems, Human Machine Interface Software and Sequential Event Recording.
The Company derived approximately 39.4%, 42.9% and 44.2% of its revenues from the sale of Power Solutions and Process Automation Products during Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively.
Technical Support. The Company’s technical support staff provides customers with maintenance, installation assistance, and calibration services, and assists sales personnel in giving technical advice to and performing product demonstrations for customers. The Company derived approximately 1.5%, 1.8% and 1.4% of its revenues from technical support operations during Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively.
Customers. During Fiscal 2013, the Company distributed products to approximately 1,000 customers, located in Hong Kong, the PRC and Macau such as the Hong Kong Environmental Protection Department, Hong Kong Water Supplies Department, Government Laboratory, Drainage Services Department, and various Environmental Monitoring Centers in the PRC. The Company does not believe that any single customer is material to its operations.
Manufacturing and Product Assembly Operations
The Company, through its PRC subsidiary, Shanghai Euro Tech Limited established in 1999 in the Pudong Jin Qiao Export Processing Zone of Shanghai, engages in the development, production, sales and servicing of environmental equipment, including the development of modern laboratory analyzers, on-line measuring equipment and other analyzers for chemicals. Our products are “tailor-made” for the diversified needs of equipment users. Main products include infrared photometric oil analyzer (“IPOA”), COD analyzers, total organic carbon (“TOC”) analyzer, turbidity meters, total suspended solid analyzers, dissolved oxygen analyzers, various types of spectrophotometers as well as a full spectrum of matching chemical reagents. In late 2005, we began offering new turbidity meters manufactured by the Company. The new turbidimeter is directed at water treatment plants, environmental monitoring status, hydrological stations. In November 2006, we began actively marketing our TOC analytical instrument that measures the degree of the pollution. We have also upgraded other existing instruments and developed a quick response COD test instrument for use on surface water, underground water and domestic and industrial wastewater. In 2008 we introduced a flue gas emissions analyzer for use in environmental compliance monitoring. We also developed energy meters (devices measuring electric energy consumption and corresponding carbon dioxide emissions) and water toxicity analysis instruments. Although it takes substantial time, effort and expense to develop, test and market a product, our sales of the TOC analyzer and the flue gas emissions analyzer have been nominal to date. We cannot find a suitable market to sell the energy meters which is not that competitive.
Sources of Supply
The Company distributes products manufactured by a substantial number of major American, European and Japanese corporations, including Thermo, Biotage, Hach and Stanford, which are the Company’s largest suppliers, with purchases from them accounting for approximately, 7%, 10%, 10%, and 8% during Fiscal 2011, 10%, 17%, 11% and 7% during Fiscal 2012 and 20%, 17%, 8% and 8% during Fiscal 2013, respectively. The Company has exclusivity agreements for specified geographic areas with many of its suppliers for certain products. Those agreements do not encompass all products distributed by the Company or all of the market areas serviced by the Company. In addition, some of these agreements are memorialized not as formal contracts but rather through other acknowledgements or correspondence which may contain a vague, if any, description of the terms and conditions of such agreement or arrangement, and therefore may be unenforceable. Although the Company’s limited agreements with Biotage and Hach have expired, the Company expects new agreements to be entered into and does have an authorization letter from Hach granting the Company the right to sell its products in Hong Kong and Macao. The Company has only an Authorization Letter from Thermo granting the Company rights to sell Thermo’s Mass Spec Products in Hong Kong and Macao. The Company has only an Authorization Letter from Stanford appointing the Company as Stanford’s sales representative in the PRC and Hong Kong. Although alternative sources of supply exist, there can be no assurance that the termination of the Company’s relationship with any of the above or other vendors would not have an adverse effect on operations.
Future Planning and Expansion
We continuously search for products and equipment with substantial market potential for design and development. For example, international shipping ballast water cargo stowaway species and microorganisms that create unpredictable ecosystem contaminations as ballast water tanks are emptied or refilled at ports of call. The International Maritime Organization (“IMO”) requires that Ballast Water Management (“BWM”) Convention will enter into force 12 months after ratification by 30 States, representing 35 per cent of world merchant shipping tonnage, if and when it goes into force, all ocean going vessels be fitted with dedicated water treatment systems treating ballast water before port-of-call discharge. Pact has been attempting to develop a non-chemical BWTS since late 2010 and Pact has successfully completed and passed the land based test requirement in 2012, and is currently undergoing for ship board testing and expects to obtain certification in the PRC and comply with IMO convention around mid 2014. As of December 31, 2013, 38 countries have joined, representing 30.38% of world merchant shipping tonnage. We anticipate that the costs of any such acquisition or product development would be drawn from our general working capital and, possibly, by seeking strategic partners such as companies in the BWM Convention shipping industries or funding raising from substantial investors, and by private sales of our securities. We have no commitments or received no indications of interest for the private sales of our securities.
The Convention will enter into force 12 months after ratification by 30 States, representing 35 per cent of world merchant shipping tonnage. The adoption of the last set of Guidelines for the uniform implementation of the BWM Convention and the approval and certification of modern ballast water treatment technologies have removed the last barriers to the ratification of instrument and significant number of countries have indicated their intention to accede to this Convention in the near future.
Our plans for the near term also include use of our “on-line” product sales (via www.yibaynet.com) will allow us to continue to offer products at lower prices than our competitors. This website is not that effective at this moment.
The Company believes that by assembling the products it distributes it may realize increased gross profit margins and greater revenues and net income than if it remains only a product distributor. During the next twelve months, we intend to assemble and/or manufacture additional products, especially those related to the air pollution sector and seek opportunities with our suppliers to assemble their products, secure manufacturing and/or assembly facilities. As we begin to promote our BWTS product that currently treats wastewater at a rate of 300 cubic meters per hour, we also intend to develop other BWTS products with greater treatment capacities and target larger markets.
Regulatory Environment
Concerns about and awareness of pollution problems and environmental issues have grown at all levels of PRC government as the PRC experienced economic growth. Environmental protection laws and strict regulations have been enacted and are buttressed by increased budget allocations for environmental regulation, monitoring and enforcement. The PRC’s primary environmental protection agency is the Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP), under which there are Environment Protection Bureaus in each city and county. According to information provided by MEP, there are over 2,700 monitoring stations to collect and analyze the environmental data of each city and county. Besides MEP has identified over 14,400 major industrial polluters, including wastewater discharging enterprises, flue gas emitting enterprises, municipal wastewater treatment plants and heavy metal producing enterprises, for pollution control. MEP is considering to adding on-line toxicity as one of the parameters for on-line monitoring stations in China. The PRC government has established ambitious targets in its 12th Five-Year Program (2011-2015) to slash emissions of pollutants, including sulfur dioxide emissions and COD by 8% and ammonia nitrogen and nitrogen dioxide by 10%. The PRC government passed a law requiring power distributors to combat global warming. A central government fund, financed by a national tariff increase, will subside the tariff gap between more expensive renewable energy and the national average tariff. Preferential policies also encourage construction of renewable energy projects, projects in poorer interior regions that are often rich in water, solar and wind resources. The Company has supplied water and air quality monitoring and analytic instruments to these monitoring stations for several years. There can be no assurance that the agencies will continue to use the Company’s products for these purposes, or that other market competitors will not enter the market with superior products, distribution systems or more competitive prices. See “Competition.”
Competition
The Company faces competition from other distributors of substantially similar products as well as the manufacturers of such products, and in both foreign and Chinese markets. The Company faces its principal competition from manufacturers and other distributors of its core products located in Hong Kong and the PRC. Moreover, the Company has implemented plans to assemble products of the kind that it presently distributes (see “-Product Assembly Operations”). Assembly operations have developed to the stage where some products have already been presented to the market and the Company is in direct and unavoidable competition with certain of its vendors. There can be no assurance that the existence of this direct competition will not impair the Company’s ability or such competitor’s willingness to continue providing other products for continued distribution by the Company and that such a development would not materially adversely affect the Company’s core business.
During Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, the Company’s gross profit margins were approximately 29%, 28% and 24%, respectively. The Company believes that it competes with the PRC manufacturers on the basis of quality and technology. The Company believes it offers foreign-manufactured products which are of higher quality and use more advanced technology than products manufactured in the PRC. The Company believes that it competes with foreign manufacturers and other distributors of their products on the basis of the Company’s more extensive distribution network and an established reputation. Pact-Yixing focuses on a market of providing water and waste water treatment services to multinational companies. The Company competes in this market based upon the quality of its products and having a knowledgeable staff, but faces competition from large PRC and multinational engineering companies, that, in the Company’s view, market their services based upon low pricing as opposed to quality of service.
Website
The Company has an internet platform located at (http://www.chinah2o.com). The website is directed at environmental businesses in China. The website provides environmental news, directories of western suppliers, potential clients in China, and advertisement space but has not generated sufficient external revenue and is now being operated directly through the Company instead of through a subsidiary deregistered in February 2012.
The Company, through its subsidiary, Euro Tech Trading (Shanghai) Limited, a PRC corporation, has a internet platform. The website is located at http://www.yibaynet.com. The website is an instrument sourcing platform under which potential customers can ask for sales quotations and place orders via internet. It can replace some functions of the closed retail shops.
Sales and Marketing
The Company distributes products through its principal office located in Hong Kong and its representative PRC offices located in Beijing, and its wholly-owned trading/retail companies and their representative offices in Shanghai, Chongqing, Guangzhou, Shenyang, Xi’an and Urumqi. During Fiscal 2010, the Company closed five retail outlets and one representative office and consolidated some personnel into our remaining representative offices and retail/trading companies, and reducing overall staffing by 24 people. During Fiscal 2011, the Company closed two representative offices and consolidated some personnel into our remaining representative offices and retail/trading companies, and reducing overall staffing by 18 people. During Fiscal 2012, we reduced overall staffing by seven people. During Fiscal 2013, the Company had a marketing and sales force of 27 people who are paid a salary plus a sales-based commission. Our sales staff assists customers in selecting the equipment, auxiliary parts and products to suit customer specifications. We will continue to consolidate our operations by closing companies and offices that do not appear to be contributing to the Company.
Our remaining sales companies are located in: Shanghai, Chongqing, Guangzhou, Shenyang and Xi’an.
Our remaining representative offices are located in: Beijing and Urumqi. The representative offices are liaison offices of Far East while the sales offices are actually engaged in sales of the Company's products and assisting customers in the use of our products.
Litigation
After the fatal traffic accident in September 2010, the parents of two person who died in the accident, deceased employees of a site the Company was working upon, commenced an action against ten Defendants, including the Company, in the People’s Court, Tian Dong city, Guangxi, PRC. The Plaintiffs alleged that the accident was caused by a vehicle driven by an employee of a civil engineer sub-contractor of the Company, performing Company tasks during the accident and the Company assumed joint and several liability with the driver. The Plaintiffs sought damages of US$ 64,000 and US$ 95,000, respectively, and attorney’s fees. The Company vigorously defended the action and denied liability on the grounds that the driver had not been proven to be the employee of the civil engineer sub-contractor and had failed to obey a traffic light. The Tian Dong People’s Court issued a verdict dated September 11, 2011 finding, among other things, that the Company was not liable. One of the Plaintiffs has appealed that verdict to the Baise Intermediate People’s Court, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, PRC on November 20, 2011. After the hearing on April 23, 2012, the appellate court issued a verdict dated May 10, 2012 finding, among other things, that the Company was not liable to joint and several liability with the driver, but to bear 30% of the liability of the civil engineer sub-contractor for the amount of US$52,000. Management is considering not appealing the decision as the chance of success is remote.
The family of a Company employee who died in the accident has asked for additional compensation. However, the Company will only negotiate the compensation after the finalization of the litigation, as the final execution of the verdict by the People’s Court is awaited.
The Company presently wholly owns Far East, a Hong Kong corporation, which, in turn, owns the following corporations:
Wholly-Owned
|
|
|
●
|
Euro Tech Trading (Shanghai) Limited --- a PRC corporation.
|
●
|
Euro Tech (China) Limited --- a Hong Kong corporation.
|
●
|
Shanghai Euro Tech Limited --- a PRC corporation.
|
●
|
Shanghai Euro Tech Environmental Engineering Company, Ltd. --- a PRC corporation.
|
●
|
Chongqing Euro Tech Rizhi Technology Company Limited --- a PRC corporation.
|
●
|
Rizhi Euro Tech Instrument (Shaanxi) Company Limited --- a PRC corporation.
|
●
|
Guangzhou Euro Tech Environmental Equipment Company Limited --- a PRC corporation.
|
Majority Owned
|
|
|
●
|
Yixing Pact Environmental Technology Company Limited---a PRC corporation.
|
●
|
Pact Asia Pacific Limited---a BVI corporation.
|
|
|
Other Entities
|
|
|
|
Zhejiang Tianlan Environmental Protection Technology Company Limited — a PRC corporation.*
|
|
Zhejiang Jia Huan Electronic Co. Ltd. — a PRC corporation.*
|
___________________
* A 50 percent or less owned person accounted for by the equity method as defined by SEC rules and regulations.
The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary and primary operational arm is Far East, which it acquired in March 1997. Far East has engaged in the distribution of various industrial control equipment, which continues to be the core business of the Company, since its inception in 1971.
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
The Company has various operating lease agreements for office and industrial premises. Rental expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 were approximately US$277,000. Future minimum rental payments as of December 31, 2013, under the agreements classified as operating leases with non-cancellable terms amounted to US$266,000 of which US$242,000 are payable in the year 2014 and US$24,000 are payable within years 2015 to 2019.
The Company maintains an executive office at 18/F Gee Chang Hong Centre, 65 Wong Chuk Hang Road, Hong Kong. The Company occupies approximately 7,000 square feet of office and warehouse storage space under a two year lease that expires in May 2015 with a monthly rental payment of approximately US$4,846. The warehouse storage space is used to hold products for distribution to our customers via common carriers.
In August 1995, the Company purchased approximately 1,200 square feet of space in a building in Hong Kong. This property is now rented out to a third party.
The Company’s five field and representative offices are rented by the Company pursuant to short-term leases with an aggregate rent of approximately US$3,163 per month.
Euro Tech Trading (Shanghai) Ltd. has two offices rented pursuant to short term leases, at an aggregate monthly rent of approximately US$1,185. Shanghai Euro Tech Limited’s premises are rented pursuant to a short term lease for a monthly rent of approximately US$2,822. Shanghai Euro Tech Environmental Engineering Company, Ltd’s premises are also rented pursuant to a short term lease for a monthly rent of approximately US$1,295.
Pact occupies a 700 square meter facility in Shanghai, pursuant to a three year lease expiring in January 2017, providing for a monthly rent of approximately US$8,027.
In April 2011, the Company sold a building that had been used as representative office in Shanghai. This office was moved to the Company’s Pudong location and the building was sold for approximately US$489,000 to an independent third party.
The Company’s registered office in the BVI is located at PortcullisTrustNet Chambers, P.O. Box 3444, Road Town, Tortola, BVI and its telephone number is (284) 494-5296.
|
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
|
Overview. The Company is engaged in two different major activities, namely product distribution and manufacturing and environmental services.
The Company is a distributor of a wide range of advanced water treatment equipment, laboratory instruments, analyzers, test kits and related supplies and power generation equipment (including recorders and power quality analyzers).
The Company, through its PRC subsidiary, Shanghai Euro Tech Limited established in 1999 in the Pudong Jin Qiao Export Processing Zone of Shanghai, engages in the development, production, sales and servicing of environmental protection equipment, and energy conservation and related products.
The Company, through its majority owned subsidiaries, Pact-Yixing, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Shanghai — Environmental, and its affiliates, Blue Sky and Jia Huan, engages in water and waste-water treatment engineering business and air pollution control business.
Background - Political and Economic Conditions in Hong Kong and the PRC
The Company’s operations are located almost entirely within, and revenues are almost entirely generated from Hong Kong and the PRC. Set forth below are the approximate percentage of the Company’s sales made to customers in the PRC and Hong Kong for the fiscal years indicated:
Fiscal Year
|
|
PRC
|
|
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
2012
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
2013
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
Sales to customers situated in Macau and elsewhere through Fiscal 2013 were nominal. This makes the Company particularly susceptible to changes in the political and economic climate of either Hong Kong or the PRC.
Hong Kong. Hong Kong has been one of the prime centers for commercial activity and economic development recently in Southeast Asia. On July 1, 1997, sovereignty over Hong Kong was transferred from the United Kingdom to the PRC. As provided in the Sino-British Joint Declaration and the Basic Law, the Hong Kong SAR is provided a high degree of autonomy except in foreign and defense affairs. The Basic Law provides that the Hong Kong SAR is to have its own legislature, legal and judicial system and full economic autonomy for 50 years after the transfer of sovereignty. Based on the current political conditions and the Company’s understanding of the Basic Law, the Company does not believe that the transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong has had or will have an adverse impact on its financial and operating environment. Although the Chinese government has pledged to maintain the economic and political autonomy of Hong Kong over its internal affairs, there is no assurance that such pledge will continue to be honored if there are changes in the Chinese political or economic climate. Sales in Hong Kong, expressed as a percentage of our revenue increased by 7% in Fiscal 2013 as compared with Fiscal 2012. See Item 3D. “Key Information — Risk Factors.”
PRC. The PRC has been a socialist state since 1949. For more than half a century, the PRC’s economy has been, and presently continues to be, a socialist economy operating under government controls promulgated under various State Plans adopted by central Chinese government authorities and implemented, to a large extent, by provincial and local authorities which may set production and development targets. However, since approximately the early 1980s, the PRC’s national government has undertaken certain reforms to permit greater provincial and local economic autonomy and private economic activities. Any change in political or economic conditions may substantially adversely affect these reform initiatives and, in turn, the Company. Sales in the PRC, expressed as a percentage of total revenue decreased by 7% in Fiscal 2013 as compared with Fiscal 2012. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in engineering revenues from the PRC as a result of competition from companies offering similar services, that we believe to be of lower quality than our services, at lower prices. See Item 3D. “Key Information — Risk Factors.”
Results from Operations
The following operating and financial review should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. All financial data referred to in the following discussion has been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”).
The following table presents selected statement of operations data expressed in thousands of US$ and as a percentage of revenue for the Company’s fiscal years indicated below:
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
18,602 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
21,645 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
20,213 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
22,305 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
27,336 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
13,138 |
|
|
|
70.6 |
% |
|
|
15,480 |
|
|
|
71.5 |
% |
|
|
15,322 |
|
|
|
75.8 |
% |
|
|
16,564 |
|
|
|
74.3 |
% |
|
|
20,876 |
|
|
|
76.4 |
% |
Gross Profit
|
|
|
5,464 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
% |
|
|
6,165 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
% |
|
|
4,891 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
|
5,741 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
|
6,460 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
% |
Selling and administrative Expenses
|
|
|
5,719 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
% |
|
|
6,224 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
% |
|
|
6,565 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
|
7,119 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
% |
|
|
6,598 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
% |
(Loss)/income before income Taxes
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
-0.8 |
% |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
(1,204 |
) |
|
|
-6.0 |
% |
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
|
|
-5.9 |
% |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
-0.1 |
% |
Income taxes/(benefit)
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
-0.3 |
% |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Equity in income of Affiliates
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
-0.6 |
% |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
-0.1 |
% |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
-3.4 |
% |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
Net (income)/loss attributable to Non controlling interest
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
-0.6 |
% |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
-1.4 |
% |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
-1.5 |
% |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
-1.1 |
% |
Net (loss)/income attributable to the Company
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
-0.1 |
% |
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
-2.0 |
% |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
(1,087 |
) |
|
|
-4.9 |
% |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012
Revenue; Gross Profit and Cost of Revenue. Revenue decreased by approximately US$ 3,043,000 or 14.1% to approximately US$ 18,602,000 in Fiscal 2013 from approximately US$ 21,645,000 in Fiscal 2012. The decrease was principally due to a decrease in revenues from engineering activities of approximately US$3,163,000 consisted of a decrease of approximately US$ 887,000 for Shanghai — Environmental and decrease of approximately US$ 2,276,000 for Pact-Yixing. The drop in sales revenue from engineering activities in the PRC was the result of competition from companies offering similar services, that we believe to be of lower quality than our services, at lower prices. Pact-Yixing’s revenues of approximately US$ 7,159,000 and US$ 9,435,000 were included in our revenues in Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, respectively.
Gross profits decreased by approximately US$ 701,000 or 11.4% to approximately US$ 5,464,000 for Fiscal 2013 as compared to approximately US$ 6,165,000 for Fiscal 2012. During Fiscal 2013, the Compan’ys cost of revenue was approximately US$ 13,138,000, or 70.6% of revenues, in comparison to approximately US$15,480,000, or 71.5% for Fiscal 2012. Cost of revenue expressed as a percentage of revenue decreased by 0.9% in Fiscal 2013 as compared with Fiscal 2012. The gross profit margin percentage increase was due principally to improvement in gross margin of engineering revenues. Pact-Yixing contributed approximately US$ 2,882,000 to our gross profit in Fiscal 2012, a decrease of approximately US$ 709,000 from Fiscal 2012.
Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses were approximately US$ 5,719,000 in Fiscal 2013, a decrease of approximately US$ 505,000 or 8.1% from approximately US$ 6,224,000 in Fiscal 2012. The decrease was principally due to the reduction of expenses for trading and manufacturing activities as the Company continued to consolidate its trading business. Pact-Yixing’s selling and administrative expenses also decreased by approximately US$244,000 in Fiscal 2013 as compared to Fiscal 2012 principally as a result of a decrease in research and development expenses incurred for the BWTS.
Equity in Income of Affiliates. Equity in income of affiliates was approximately US$325,000 in Fiscal 2013, an increase of approximately US$316,000 from approximately US$ 9,000 in Fiscal 2012. The increase was primarily due to the increase in contribution from Blue Sky as a result of completion of some major contracts.
Interest Income. Interest income in Fiscal 2013 was approximately US$45,000 as compared to approximately US$46,000 in Fiscal 2012.
Other Income. Other income increased by approximately US$ 6,000 or 12.5% to approximately US$ 54,000 in Fiscal 2013 from approximately US$ 48,000 in Fiscal 2012. The increase in other income was principally due to increase in rental income of approximately US$ 7,000.
Loss/Gain on Disposal of Fixed Assets. Loss on disposal of fixed assets was approximately US$1,000 in Fiscal 2013 as compared to approximately US$ 22,000 in Fiscal 2012.
Income Taxes. Taxes decreased by US$ 69,000 to approximately US$ 73,000 in Fiscal 2013 from approximately US$142,000 in Fiscal 2012. This decrease was primarily the result of decrease in net taxable income for Fiscal 2013.
Net Income. Income from continuing operations improved by approximately US$ 411,000 to a net loss of approximately US$ 18,000 in Fiscal 2013 from a net loss of approximately US$429,000 in Fiscal 2012. The improvement was primarily due to the profit contribution from Blue Sky and our reduction in selling and administrative expenses.
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011
Revenue; Gross Profit and Cost of Revenue. Revenue increased by approximately US$ 1,432,000 or 7.1% to approximately US$ 21,645,000 in Fiscal 2012 from approximately US$ 20,213,000 in Fiscal 2011. The increase was principally due to an increase in revenues from engineering activities of approximately US$ 2,003,000 which was in excess of the decrease in revenues from trading and manufacturing activities of approximately US$ 571,000. Pact-Yixing’s revenues of approximately US$ 9,435,000 and US$ 5,098,000 were included in our revenues in Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively.
Gross profits increased by approximately US$ 1,274,000 or 26.0% to approximately US$ 6,165,000 for Fiscal 2012 as compared to approximately US$ 4,891,000 for Fiscal 2011. During Fiscal 2012, the Company’s cost of revenue was approximately US$ 15,480,000, or 71.5% of revenues, in comparison to approximately US$ 15,322,000, or 75.8% for Fiscal 2011. Cost of revenue expressed as a percentage of revenue decreased by 4.3% in Fiscal 2012 as compared with Fiscal 2011. The gross profit margin percentage increase was due principally to improvement in gross margin of both trading and engineering revenues. Yixing-Pact contributed approximately US$ 3,591,000 to our gross profit margin in Fiscal 2012, an increase of approximately US$ 1,879,000 from Fiscal 2011.
Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses were approximately US$ 6,224,000 in Fiscal 2012, a decrease of approximately US$ 341,000 or 5.2% from approximately US$ 6,565,000 in Fiscal 2011. The decrease was principally due to the reduction of expenses for trading and manufacturing activities as the Company continued to consolidate its trading business. Pact-Yixing’s selling and administrative expenses increased by approximately US$ 153,000 in Fiscal 2012 as compared to Fiscal 2011 principally as a result of research and development expenses incurred for the BWTS.
Equity in Income of Affiliates. Equity in income of affiliates of approximately US$ 9,000 in Fiscal 2012, a decrease of approximately US$ 1,122,000 from approximately US$ 1,131,000 in Fiscal 2011. The decrease was primarily due to the decline in contribution from Blue Sky as a result of delay in commencement of some major contracts.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased by approximately US$14,000 or 23.3% to approximately US$46,000 in Fiscal 2012 from approximately US$60,000 for Fiscal 2011. The increase was primarily due to the drop in interest rates.
Other Income. Other income decreased by approximately US$ 34,000 or 41.5% to approximately US$48,000 in Fiscal 2012 from approximately US$ 82,000 in Fiscal 2011. The decrease in other income was principally due to a foreign exchange loss of approximately US$ 17,000 in Fiscal 2012 as compared to foreign exchange gain of approximately US$ 26,000 in Fiscal 2011.
Loss/Gain on Disposal of Fixed Assets. Loss on disposal of fixed assets was approximately US$22,000 in Fiscal 2012. Gain on disposal of fixed assets of approximately US$ 328,000 in Fiscal 2011 was principally due to the sale of a property in Shanghai.
Income Taxes. Taxes increased by US$ 205,000 to approximately US$ 142,000 in tax charges in Fiscal 2012 from approximately US$63,000 tax credit in Fiscal 2011. This decrease was primarily the result of net taxable profit for Fiscal 2012 as compared to net taxable losses for Fiscal 2011.
Net Income. Income from continuing operations decreased by approximately US$ 950,000 to a net loss of approximately US$ 429,000 in Fiscal 2012 from a net income of approximately US$521,000 in Fiscal 2011. The decrease was primarily due to the there was a non-recurrent gain on disposal of a property in Fiscal 2011 and no profit contribution from Blue Sky.
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
|
The Company has primarily used its funds to finance accounts receivable, inventories, and capital expenditures including purchases of property, office furniture and equipment, computers and calibration equipment. The Company has historically met its cash requirements from cash flows from operations, short-term borrowings, bank lines of credit, and long-term mortgage bank loans. The Company expects, but can make no assurances that its present cash reserves, cash from operations, existing available bank credit facilities and proceeds from the issuance of our ordinary shares pursuant to stock option exercises would be sufficient to fund its future capital expenditure requirements. Working capital at the end of Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012 were approximately US$5,830,000 and US$ 5,706,000, respectively.
During Fiscal 2013, the Company used net cash of approximately US$2,555,000 in its operating activities principally as a result of net loss of US$18,000, increase in accounts receivables of approximately US$993,000 and prepayments and other current assets of approximately US$436,000, decrease in accounts payable of approximately US$598,000 and other payables of approximately US$299,000 which was partially covered by an inventory decrease of approximately US$159,000. During Fiscal 2012, the Company generated net cash of approximately US$2,794,000 from its operating activities principally as a result of decrease in accounts receivables of approximately US$655,000 and prepayments and other current assets of approximately US$925,000, increase in accounts payable of approximately US$838,000 and other payables of approximately US$327,000 that was sufficient to cover the net loss of approximately US$ 429,000.
During Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, the Company generated approximately US$ 336,000 and used approximately US$ 632,000 in investing activities, respectively. The Company used approximately US$51,000 and US$ 41,000 to purchase facilities and equipment in Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, respectively. During Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, the Company reduced approximately US$274,000 and used approximately US$593,000, respectively, as restricted cash to issue performance guarantees to its customers through its banks in projects requiring performance guarantees. During Fiscal 2011, the Company used approximately US$238,000 to acquire additional 5% equity interest in Pact-Yixing and used approximately US$435,000 to maintain its 20% equity interest in Blue Sky as a result of capital expansion resulting from the issuance of additional shares to employees of Blue Sky.
During Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, the Company received dividends of approximately US$246,000 and US$Nil, respectively, from the affiliates. The Company used approximately US$Nil and US$33,000, respectively, in Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012 for financing the purchase of its Ordinary Shares as treasury stock. The Company had various banking facilities available for overdraft, import and export credits and foreign exchange contracts from which the Company could have accessed up to approximately US$1,538,000 at December 31, 2013. The aforementioned available credit facilities were obtained on the conditions that, among other things, the Company not create a charge or lien on its other assets in favor of third parties without such bank’s consent, and the Company maintaining a certain level of net worth. These credit facilities were obtained on the conditions that, among other things, the Company pledge rented out property of approximately 1,200 square feet in Hong Kong as security, not create a charge or lien on its other assets in favor of third parties without such bank’s consent, and the Company maintaining a certain level of net worth.
Cash decreased from approximately US$7,468,000 at the end of Fiscal 2012 to US$5,406,000 at the end of Fiscal 2013. The principal reasons for the decrease in cash were the results of our operating losses and the deterioration in our working capital position.
The Company’s net accounts receivable increased from approximately US$3,089,000 at the end of Fiscal 2012 to US$4,082,000 at the end of Fiscal 2013. The amount of receivables subject to collection is expected to be received under normal commercial trading terms.
The Company’s inventory decreased from approximately US$653,000 at the end of Fiscal 2012 to approximately US$494,000 at the end of Fiscal 2013.
The Company’s capital expenditures were approximately US$51,000 and US$41,000 in Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, respectively. Capital expenditures during Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012 were incurred primarily in connection with the purchase of office equipment, furniture and fixtures. The Company continues to develop new products, for example, non-chemical ballast water treatment system. If such products developments are indeed made, the Company may expect to incur significantly larger capital expenditures, for which the Company presently intends, but as to which no assurance can be made, to use existing cash reserves, cash from operations, available bank credit facilities and proceeds from the issuance of our ordinary shares to fund such capital expenditures. In April 2011, the Company sold a building that had been used as representative office in Shanghai to an independent third party for approximately US$ 489,000. This office was moved to the Company’s Pudong location where the engineering and manufacturing operates as one of its streamlining actions.
Goodwill
Goodwill related to the engineering segment which is profitable. As of December 31, 2013, we completed the annual impairment test. Based on the result of the first step of the test, the Company determined that there was no impairment of goodwill.
Anticipated Future Resources and Uses of Cash
The Company has historically funded its working capital, capital expenditure, investing and expansions needs from operations, available bank credit facilities and proceeds from the issuances of our ordinary shares and expects to continue funding these requirements from operations and available bank credit facilities. The Company may use its funds to form strategic alliances with third parties, invest in product research and development, or expand its sales offices or, with third parties, seek to acquire new products or businesses or form strategic alliances. The Company expects, but can make no assurances that its present cash reserves, cash from operations and existing available bank credit facilities would be sufficient to fund its future cash requirements.
Inflation
The Company believes generally that past declining rates of inflation in the PRC have had a positive effect on its results from operations. As a result of the recent rise in the rate of inflation in the PRC, we anticipate increases in the overhead costs of our PRC affiliates and offices. The Company believes, although no assurance can be given, that as credit restrictions are gradually lifted, it will be able to increase prices in the market for its products and thus realize increased profit margins.
Critical Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition
The Group’s main source of revenue is the sale of water and waste water related process control, analytical and testing instruments, disinfection equipment, supplies and related automation systems. The Company recognises revenue when the product is delivered and the title is transferred. For certain products where installation is necessary, revenue is recognised upon completion of installation. Revenue earned from customer support services, which represents a minor percentage of total revenues, is recognised when such services are provided.
Revenues and profits in long term fixed price contracts or engineering income are recognised using the percentage of completion method in accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition – Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts. This approach primarily based on contract costs incurred to date compared with total estimated contract costs. Changes to total estimated contract costs or losses, if any, are recognised in the period they are determined. Revenues recognised in excess of amounts billed are classified as costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts. Essentially all of such amounts are expected to be billed and collected within one year and are classified as current assets. Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts are classified as current liabilities. When reasonably dependable estimates cannot be made, construction contract revenues are recognised using the completed contract method.
Inventory Valuation
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, on the first-in, first-out method, or market value. Costs include purchase and related costs incurred in bringing each product to its present location and condition. Market value is calculated based on the estimated normal selling price, less further costs expected to be incurred for disposal. Allowance is made for obsolete, slow moving or defective items, where appropriate.
Deferred Taxes
The Group accounts for income and deferred tax under the provision of FASB ASC Subtopic 740-10, Income Taxes, under which deferred taxes are recognised for all temporary differences between the applicable tax balance sheets and the consolidated balance sheet. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. ASC 740-10 also requires the recognition of the future tax benefits of net operating loss carry forwards. A valuation allowance is established when the deferred tax assets are not expected to be realised within a reasonable period of time.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates expected to be applicable for taxable income in the years in which temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognised in income for the period that includes the enactment date.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” The amendments in this ASU clarify the scope for derivatives accounted for in accordance with Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset or subject to netting arrangements. An entity is required to apply the amendments for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” The amendments in this ASU require an entity to present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. In addition, the amendments require a cross-reference to other disclosures currently required for other reclassification items to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. Companies should apply these amendments for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2012. The Company has included the required disclosures from ASU 2013-02 in the consolidated financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04: Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date. This standard requires an entity to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this guidance is fixed at the reporting date, as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The guidance also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about those obligations. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. We do not expect the provisions of ASU 2013-04 to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity. This standard applies to the release of the cumulative translation adjustment into net income when a parent either sells a part of or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. In addition, the amendments resolve the diversity in practice for the treatment of business combinations achieved in stages (i.e. step acquisitions) involving a foreign entity. The amendments in this are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. We do not expect the provisions of ASU 2013-05 to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-10, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes.” The amendments in this ASU permit the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (also referred to as the Overnight Index Swap Rate) to be used as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under Topic 815, in addition to interest rates on direct Treasury obligations of the U.S. government and the London Interbank Offered Rate. The amendments also remove the restriction on using different benchmark rates for similar hedges. The amendments apply to all entities that elect to apply hedge accounting of the benchmark interest rate under Topic 815. The amendments are effective prospectively for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after July 17, 2013. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” The amendments in this ASU provide guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, similar tax loss, or tax credit carryforward exists. An unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date. Retrospective application is permitted. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-01, “Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).” The amendments in this ASU permit reporting entities to make an accounting policy election to account for their investments in qualified affordable housing projects using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met. Under the proportional amortization method, an entity amortizes the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received and recognizes the net investment performance in the income statement as a component of income tax expense (benefit). The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. A reporting entity that uses the effective yield method to account for its investments in qualified affordable housing projects before the date of adoption may continue to apply the effective yield method for those preexisting investments. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for annual periods and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2014-01 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04, “Receivables-Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).” The amendments in this ASU clarify that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either (1) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure or (2) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Additionally, the amendments require interim and annual disclosure of both (1) the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and (2) the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2014-04 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
The Company does not believe that any other recently issued and adopted, but not yet effective, accounting standards should have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.
|
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES
|
During Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, the Company expensed approximately US$427,000, US$930,000 and US$200,000, respectively, on the development of its products. It is anticipated that an additional US$600,000 in research and development costs will be expended on similar projects and potential research and development projects for the development of BWTS, air and water testing equipment and monitoring equipment during Fiscal 2014.
There are increasing demands in the PRC for clean water, clean air, greater industrial pollution controls, waste management and electricity. We also see additional distributors competing with us. However, given the political situation in the PRC, trends could quickly disappear and we do not know if they will continue in the future. We note that, as evidenced by our acquisition of Pact-Yixing, we are placing greater emphasis on developing our engineering solution business in an effort to capitalize on these increased demands (clean water, pollution controls and waste management).
The Company believes that the expenses incurred in product development may result in increases in revenue but such increases are unlikely to allow for a recovery of the expenses for approximately the next two years.
|
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS.
|
None.
|
TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS.
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
After
5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Leases
|
|
US$ |
266,000 |
|
|
US$ |
242,000 |
|
|
US$ |
24,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
|
|
US$ |
266,000 |
|
|
US$ |
242,000 |
|
|
US$ |
24,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
|
|
DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT
|
Information concerning the Directors and Executive Officers of the Company are as follows:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
T.C. Leung
|
|
70
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jerry Wong
|
|
55
|
|
Director and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alex Sham
|
|
50
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y.K. Liang
|
|
84
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ka Chong Cheang
|
|
85
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Li Da Weng
|
|
69
|
|
Director
|
Set forth below is a brief background of the executive officers and directors based upon the information supplied by them to the Company:
T.C. Leung has been Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of both the Company and Far East since their inception. Before establishing Far East, Mr. Leung was an engineer for English Electric in England, from 1965 to 1968, and Lockheed Aircraft in Hong Kong, from 1968 to 1970. Mr. Leung also served as managing director of Eurotherm (Far East) Ltd. (“Eurotherm”) between 1971 and 1992. From 1988 until he retired in February 2005, Mr. Leung had also served as managing director of Eurotherm Hong Kong. Mr. Leung received a Masters degree in Business Administration from the University of East Asia, Macau in 1986 and is a Chartered Engineer, a title bestowed upon a member of the Council of Engineering Institutions in the United Kingdom.
Jerry Wong has served as Director and Chief Financial Officer of Far East since 1994 and has been with Far East since 1987. Mr. Wong has been the Chief Financial Officer and a Director of the Company since its inception. From 1985 until 1987, Mr. Wong worked for MUA Agencies Ltd., a subsidiary of a Hong Kong publicly listed company engaged in the insurance business, as deputy manager of its secretarial, legal and accounting department. From 1981 until 1985, Mr. Wong served as a senior accountant in Price Waterhouse-Hong Kong. He is a Fellow of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants in the United Kingdom and a Certified Public Accountant in Hong Kong.
Alex Sham has been a Director of the Company since its inception. Mr. Sham joined Far East in 1988 and has been its Sales Manager since 1993 and became a Director of Far East in 1996. Mr. Sham received a Bachelor of Science in Applied Chemistry from Hong Kong Baptist University in 1990. Prior to joining Far East, Mr. Sham was employed by the Environmental Protection Department of the Hong Kong Government from 1986 until 1988. Mr. Sham received a Master’s Degree in Business Administration from the University of Adelaide in 2003.
Y.K. Liang has been a Director of the Company since February 1998. Mr. Liang is a director of Wong Liang Consultants Ltd. (“Consultants”) and a member of the certified public accounting firm of Y.K. Liang & Co. (“LCO”). Mr. Liang has been associated with both Consultants and LCO for more than the past five years. Consultants is a general business consulting firm.
Ka Chong Cheang has been a Director of the Company since December 2005. From 1952 until 1977, he had been shipping manager for John Swire & Sons (Hong Kong) Ltd., a firm engaged in the importing and exporting shipping industry. For more than the past five years, Mr. Chong has been a business consultant.
Li Da Weng, from 1993 until January 2005, was the General Director of the Yangtze Valley Water Resources Protection Bureau (“YVWRPB”). He was employed by the YVWRPB in various positions, for more than 25 years, before he became the General Director in 1993. Since 2005, he has been the Secretary General of Yangtze Forum, a group of governments, businesses, universities and research institutes meeting on occasion to discuss issues on protecting and developing the Yangtze River, and since 1994 he has been a member of the Science and Technical Committee of Changjiang Water Resources Commission. Mr. Li Da Weng graduated from Hengyang Mining and Metallurgy College (now known as Nanhua University) in 1965 with a Bachelor’s Degree in Analytical Chemistry. From December 1981 to December 1983, he was a visiting scholar at the Canada’s Centre for Inland Waters, National Water Research Institute.
Directors of the Company serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders of the Company and until their successors are elected and duly qualified. Officers of the Company are elected annually by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
None of the Company’s directors, officers or beneficial owners of ten percent or more of its Common Stock are required to file any reports pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.
The Company had one meeting of its Board of Directors during Fiscal 2013, while its Audit Committee had four meetings during Fiscal 2013.
There are no material legal proceedings involving any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, owner of record or beneficially of more than five percent of the Company’s Common Stock or any associate of an foregoing.
Key Employees
George Hayek, Managing Director. He is the founder of Pact-Yixing and is a civil engineer (1967) and post-graduate certificate holder in sanitary engineering and environmental management from the American University of Beirut and the University of California at Irvine (in 1971 and 1988, respectively). Since 1971, he has occupied several key posts in water and waste-water treatment companies in the USA, the UK, Spain, Cyprus, The Middle East, Southeast Asia and the last 14 years in the PRC. From 1998 to date, he has been the managing director of Pact. His international experience helped Pact in securing most of the contracts with European and American multinational industries in the PRC.
Yvonne Xia manages Pact- Yixing’s Procurement Department, as well as assisting the managing director in management of the various departments. She joined Pact-Yixing at the time of their formation in 1998. Ms. Xia is an environmental engineering graduate from Qing Hua University of Beijing (1989) and an EMBA graduate from the Olin School of Management of the Washington University (2003). She has several positions of increasing responsibility including management of engineering, sales, projects, procurement and projects while with Pact-Yixing.
David YL Leung is the General Manager of Yixing Pact Environmental Technology Ltd, Shanghai. His responsibility includes management of engineering, sales, marketing, projects, and procurement. Before joining PACT, he was the Business Development Manager of Euro Tech (Far East) Ltd, the parent company of Yixing Pact in Hong Kong, and has been working for the parent company for more than 10 years. Mr. Leung has gained a solid sales and marketing experience in distributing power, analytical and scientific testing equipment in Hong Kong and Macao. He has also worked for a high tech Japanese company focus on power and electrical testing instrument in Japan from 2000 and 2001 as a trainee. Mr. Leung is an environmental studies graduate from Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada (1997) with a special focus on Environmental Impact Assessment, and a Master of Management graduate from Macquarie Graduate School of Management, Sydney Australia (2010). Mr. David YL Leung is the son of Mr. T.C. Leung, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman.
From the Company and its subsidiaries, for services rendered in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries during Fiscal 2013, T.C. Leung the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer received a yearly salary of US$ 154,000 and George Hayek, a Key Employee of the Company, received a yearly salary of US$ 110,000. David YL Leung, a Key Employee of the Company receives an annual salary of US$125,000 and is reimbursed for actual travel and lodging expenses in Shanghai. There is no other information with respect to the compensation paid by the Company and its subsidiaries, for services rendered in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries during Fiscal 2013 to the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and a Key Employee of the Company. No other executive officer or employee received in excess of US$ 100,000 as compensation during Fiscal 2013.
Compensation of Directors. Directors of the do not receive compensation for their services as directors; however, Board of Directors authorize the payment of compensation to the Directors for their attendance at regular and annual meetings of the Board and for attendance at committee meetings of the Board as is customary for similar companies. Directors are reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with their duties to the Company.
Pension Plan. Prior to December 1, 2000, the Company had only one defined contribution pension plan for all its Hong Kong employees. Under this plan, all employees were entitled to pension benefits equal to their own contributions 50% to 100% of individual fund account balances contributed by the Company, depending on their years of service with the Company. The Company was required to make specific contributions at approximately 10% of the basic salaries of the employees to an independent fund management company.
With the introduction of the Mandatory Provident Fund Scheme, a defined contribution scheme managed by an independent trustee on December 1, 2000, each of the Company and its employees who joined the Company subsequently makes monthly contributions to the scheme at 5% of the employee’s cash income as defined under the Mandatory Provident Fund legislation. Contributions of both the Company and its employees are subject to a maximum of HK$1,250 per month and thereafter contributions are voluntary and are not subject to any limitation. The Company and its employees made their first contributions in December 2000.
As stipulated by the rules and regulations in the PRC, the Company contributes to state-sponsored retirement plans for its employees in the PRC. The Company contributes approximately 12% to 22% of the basic salaries of its employees, and has no further obligations for the actual payment of pension or post-retirement benefits beyond the annual contributions. The state-sponsored retirement plans are responsible for the entire pension obligations payable to retired employees.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the aggregate contribution of the Company to the aforementioned pension plans and retirement benefit schemes was approximately US$353,000.
Company Option Plans. The Company’s 2002 Officers and Directors Plan (referred to as the “Officer Plans”) provided for the grant of options to acquire Ordinary Shares to the Company’s executive officers and directors and persons holding the same positions with the Company’s subsidiaries. The 2002 Employees Plan (referred to as the “Employees Plan”) provided for the grant of options to acquire Ordinary Shares to key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries.
No option was exercisable more than ten years from the date the option was granted.
During Fiscal 2012, the sole Officer and Director of the Company to hold options to purchase Ordinary Shares of the Company was T.C. Leung, who held 30,909 options with a per share exercise price of US$3.22. Said options were granted pursuant to the 2002 Officers and Directors Plan and expired in November 2012.
As of December 31, 2012, 280,349 options had been exercised, including 54,600 options, 72,236 options and 37,418 options exercised by Mr. Leung at prices of US$3.18, US$ 3.22 and US$4.51 per share, respectively. The Company has set forth in this Report all required disclosure of additional compensation to its executive officers and directors including personal benefits and securities or properties paid or distributed which was not offered on the same terms to all full time employees during Fiscal 2013.
Changes in outstanding options under various plans mentioned above were as follows:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Number of
Options
|
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
|
|
Number
of
Options
|
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
|
|
Number
of
Options
|
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, beginning of year
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
36,255 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
|
46,182 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Cancelled/Expired
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(36,255 |
) |
|
|
(3.36 |
) |
|
|
(9,927 |
) |
|
|
(3.47 |
) |
Exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(- |
) |
|
|
(- |
) |
|
|
(- |
) |
|
|
(- |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
36,255 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, end of year
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
36,255 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
As of December 31, 2013, no options were outstanding and exercisable. All stock options plans expired in 2012.
As of December 31, 2013, there were no options outstanding.
The Company adopted the provisions of ASC 718-10, which requires us to recognize expense related to the fair value of our stock-based compensation awards, including employee stock options.
The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the input of subjective assumptions, including the expected volatility of stock price. Because changes in subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in directors’ opinion, the existing model may not necessarily provide a realizable measure of the fair value of the stock options.
The term of each of the Company’s directors expires at the election and qualification of their successors at the next annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders, anticipated to be held in August of this year. All of the Company’s six directors were re-elected at the Company’s last annual meeting of shareholders in August 2012. The Board has a standing Audit Committee to assist the Board in carrying out its duties. The Audit Committee has a written charter approved by the Board. The chair of the Audit Committee determines the meeting agenda of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee members receive materials in advance of Committee meetings allowing them to prepare for the meeting.
During Fiscal 2013, the Audit Committee met four times, being attended by all members. The Audit Committee assists the Board in monitoring the Company’s financial accounting, controls, planning and reporting. Among its duties, the Audit Committee:
●
|
reviews the Company’s auditing, accounting and financial reporting process;
|
|
|
●
|
reviews the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls;
|
|
|
●
|
reviews the independence, fee arrangements, audit scope, and performance of the Company’s independent auditors, and recommends the appointment or replacement of independent auditors to the Board of Directors;
|
|
|
●
|
reviews and approves all non-audit work, if any, to be performed by the auditors;
|
|
|
●
|
reviews the scope of our internal auditing and the adequacy of the organizational structure and qualifications of the internal auditing staff;
|
|
|
●
|
reviews, before release, the audited financial statements and operating and financial review and prospects contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, and recommends that the Board of Directors submit these items to the shareholders’ meeting for approval;
|
|
|
●
|
provides an open avenue of communication among the Company’s independent auditors, financial and senior management, the internal audit function and the Board of Directors;
|
|
|
●
|
reviews and updates the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and ensure that there is a system to enforce same and that this Code complies with all applicable rules and regulations;
|
|
|
●
|
ensures that the Company’s management and auditors assess current financial reporting issues and practices; and
|
|
|
●
|
reviews and pre-approves both audit and non-audit services to be provided by the Company’s auditors.
|
The Audit Committee is currently composed of Y.K. Liang, Ka Chong Cheang and Li Da Weng. The Audit Committee’s “financial expert” is Y.K. Liang. The Board has determined that the membership of the Audit Committee meets the current independence requirements of the NASDAQ listing standards as same applies to private foreign issuers and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC because they are not currently employed by us, and do not fall into any of the enumerated categories of who cannot be considered independent in NASDAQ’s listing standards.
At April 25, 2014, the Company (exclusive of Yixing-Pact) had approximately 79 full-time employees. At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, staffing levels were approximately as follows:
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Marketing and sales
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Technical
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Total full time employees
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
At April 25, 2014, Pact-Yixing had approximately 50 full-time employees. At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, staffing levels were approximately as follows: Engineers; 41, 42 and 38, Administrative Persons; 9, 10 and 15.
The Company is not subject to any collective bargaining agreement and believes that its relations with its employees are good. The Company’s Management consists of its officers and directors.
With respect to the share ownership of the directors and senior management of the Company, reference is made to Items 7. “Major Shareholders” and 7B. “Related Party Transactions.”
The following table sets forth, as of April 25, 2014, certain information concerning beneficial ownership of the Company’s voting shares that date, with respect to (i) each person known to the Company to own 5% or more of the outstanding Ordinary Shares, (ii) each director and executive officer of the Company, and (iii) all officers and directors of the Company as a group:
|
|
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership(3)
|
|
|
Approximate
Percentage
Of Ordinary
Shares Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T.C. Leung (1)(2)
|
|
|
1,059,852
|
|
|
|
51.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pearl Venture Ltd.(1)
|
|
|
247,068
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alex Sham(1)
|
|
|
53,722
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jerry Wong(1)
|
|
|
34,866
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y.K. Liang(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ka Chong Cheang(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Li Da Weng(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Executive Officers And Directors of the Company as a group (6 persons)(2)
|
|
|
1,148,440
|
|
|
|
55.5
|
%
|
_______________________
*
|
Denotes Nil
|
|
|
(1)
|
The address for the Company’s officers and directors is c/o Euro Tech (Far East) Ltd., 18/F Gee Chang Hong Centre, 65 Wong Chuk Hang Road, Hong Kong. The address for Pearl Venture Ltd. (“Pearl”) is Columbus Centre Building, Wichhams Cay, Road Town, Tortola, BVI.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes shares of the Company’s Common Stock owned of record by Pearl, which is a trust established for the benefit of Mr. Leung.
|
|
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS.
|
See Item 4.B. Business Overview - Business for the discussion of the formation of the joint venture. Pact Environmental Equipment Co. Limited in June 2007.
See Item 6B. Compensation.
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
Item 8A.1
|
See Item 18.
|
|
|
Item 8A.2
|
See Item 18.
|
|
|
Item 8A.3
|
See Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms, pages F-2 and F-3.
|
|
|
Item 8A.4
|
We have complied with this requirement.
|
|
|
Item 8A.5
|
Not applicable.
|
|
|
Item 8A.6
|
Not applicable.
|
|
|
Item 8A.7
|
Legal Proceedings. See “- Item 4B. Business Overview-Litigation.”
|
|
|
Item 8A.8
|
Dividend Policy.
|
The Company has not paid cash dividends to date. The payment of cash dividends, if any, in the future is within the discretion of the Board of Directors. The payment of cash dividends, if any, in the future will depend upon the Company’s earnings, capital requirements and financial conditions and other relevant factors. The Company’s Board of Directors does not presently intend to declare any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, but instead intends to retain all earnings, if any, for use in the Company and Far East’s business operations.
There has not been any significant change since the date of the annual financial statements included in this Report.
The Company has one class of securities presently registered: Ordinary Shares. These securities are presently traded on the NASDAQ’s Capital Market under the trading symbols “CLWT”.
The high and low prices for the Ordinary Shares in the periods indicated, as reported by NASDAQ, are set forth below:
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
US$
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
23.21
|
|
2010
|
|
|
5.49
|
|
|
|
14.74
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
9.13
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
6.75
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
US$
|
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
1.98
|
|
|
|
6.30
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
3.62
|
|
|
|
5.17
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
September 30, 2013
|
|
|
2.47
|
|
|
|
5.60
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
3.12
|
|
|
|
6.75
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
4.03
|
|
|
|
6.23
|
|
The Following Months
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
US$
|
|
November 2013
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
|
|
3.85
|
|
December 2013
|
|
|
3.36
|
|
|
|
6.75
|
|
January 2014
|
|
|
4.03
|
|
|
|
5.38
|
|
February 2014
|
|
|
4.28
|
|
|
|
6.23
|
|
March 2014
|
|
|
4.45
|
|
|
|
5.70
|
|
Based upon information received from its transfer Agent, the Company believes that it has approximately 40 shareholders of record including 500 beneficial owners of its Ordinary Shares held in nominee names by large clearing houses.
See Item 9A. “Listing Details.”
Authorized Capital. The authorized capital of the Company is comprised of 20,000,000 Ordinary Shares and 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. All of the Company’s shares of capital stock have no par value. In January 2012, the Company combined (reverse split) all of its issued Ordinary Shares at a ratio of two shares for each eleven shares issued. As of April 1, 2014, there were 2,069,223 Ordinary Shares issued and outstanding with 160,386 held by the Company as treasury shares.
Holders of the Company’s Ordinary Shares are entitled to one vote for each whole share on all matters to be voted upon by shareholders, including the election of directors. Holders of Ordinary Shares do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. All shares of Ordinary Shares are equal to each other with respect to liquidation and dividend rights. In the event of the liquidation of the Company, all assets available for distribution to the holders of Ordinary Shares are distributable among them according to their respective share holdings. All of the outstanding shares of Ordinary Shares of the Company are duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
Pursuant to the Company’s Memorandum and Articles of Association and pursuant to the laws of the BVI, the Company’s Memorandum and Articles of Association may be amended by a resolution of the Board of Directors without shareholder approval. This includes amendments to increase or reduce the authorized capital stock of the Company or to increase or reduce the par value of its shares. The ability of the Company to amend its Memorandum and Articles of Association without shareholder approval could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control of the Company without any further action by the shareholders including but not limited to, a tender offer to purchase the Common Stock at a premium over then current market prices.
Under United States law, majority and controlling shareholders generally have certain “fiduciary” responsibilities to the minority shareholders. Shareholder action must be taken in good faith and actions by controlling shareholders which are obviously unreasonable may be declared null and void. The BVI law protecting the interests of the minority shareholders is not as protective in all circumstances as the law protecting minority shareholders in United States jurisdictions. While BVI law does not permit a shareholder of a BVI company to sue its directors derivatively, i.e., in the name of and for the benefit of the Company, and to sue the Company and its directors for his benefit and the benefit of others similarly situated, the circumstances in which any such action may be brought that may be available in respect of any such action may result in the rights of shareholders of a British Virgin Island company being more limited than those rights of shareholders in a United States company.
The Board of Directors of the Company, without further shareholder action, may issue shares of Preferred Stock in any number of series and may establish as to each such series the designation and number of shares to be issued and the relative rights and preferences of the shares of each series, including provisions regarding voting powers, redemption, dividend rights, rights upon liquidation and conversion rights. The issuance of shares of Preferred Stock by the Board of Directors could adversely affect the rights of holders of Ordinary Shares by, among other matters, establishing preferential dividends, liquidation rights and voting power. The Company has not issued any shares of Preferred Stock and has no present intention to issue shares of Preferred Stock. The issuance thereof could discourage or defeat efforts to acquire control of the Company through acquisition of Ordinary Shares.
|
MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
|
On January 1, 2005, the BVI Business Companies Act, as amended, (the “BC ACT”) came into force, with the objective of replacing the now repealed International Business Companies Act ( the “IBC” Act ) over a 2 year transitional period. The Company was incorporated under the IBC Act, on January 1, 2007, the Company was automatically re-registered under the BC Act as a BVI Business Company. Companies that were automatically re-registered on January 1, 2007 were not required to submit a new Memorandum and Articles of Association and certain key sections of the IBC Act were “grandfathered” into the BC Act: these are known as the “Transitional Provisions”. The Transitional Provisions ensure that well established and recognized concepts from the IBC Act, such as “ authorized capital:, “capital accounts” and “surplus accounts , remain relevant until such time as that company elects to adopt and register a New Memorandum and Articles of Association that fully conform with the BC Act. In November 2011 and January 2012, the Company filed an Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association with the Registry of Corporate Affairs of the BVI Financial Services Commission that on November 29, 2011 and January 30, 2012 that became as of filing with the BVI authorities to, among other things, (i) not apply the Transitional Provisions and (ii)remove these concepts from the Company’s charter documents eliminating a layer of requirements that would otherwise apply to share divisions (splits), combinations (reverse splits), redemptions and dividends. The Company’s accounting treatment of share capital need not change. Changes in the Company’s Amended and Restated Memorandum are summarized in the Company’s Forms 6-K filed with the SEC on November 30, 2011 and February 6,2012.The foregoing Forms 6-K are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein. Set forth below is a summary of certain terms of the Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association and the BC Act relating to the Company’s securities. This description and the descriptions contained in the Forms 6-K incorporated by reference does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to BVI statutory law and the Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association.
Share Register and Voting Restrictions. The Company maintains a share register at its registered office in the BVI. The Company’s registered number is 200960. The objects of the Company are to engage in any act or activity that is not prohibited under any law of the BVI. Under the Articles, the Company is not required to treat the holder of a registered share in the Company as a shareholder until that person’s name has been entered in the share register. The holders of Ordinary Shares have one vote for each Ordinary Share held of record. The holders of Preferred Shares have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers and such restrictions as may be stated and expressed in the resolution providing for the issuance of the Preferred Shares.
Shareholders Meeting. The directors of the Company may convene meetings of the shareholders of the Company at such times and in such manner and places within or outside the BVI as the directors consider necessary or desirable. Upon the written request of the shareholders holding ten (10%) percent or more of the outstanding voting shares in the Company the directors must convene a meeting of shareholders.
A shareholder may participate at a meeting of shareholders by telephone or other electronic means, as long as all shareholders participating in the meeting are able to hear each other.
A meeting of shareholders is duly constituted if, at the commencement of the meeting, there are present in person or by proxy not less than fifty (50%) percent of the votes of the shares or class series of shares entitled to vote on resolutions of shareholders to be considered at the meeting. If a quorum is not present, the meeting, if convened upon the requisition of shareholders, shall be dissolved; in any other case it shall stand adjourned to the next business day at the same time and place or to such other time and place as the directors may determine, and if at the adjourned meeting there are present in person or by proxy not less than one third of the votes of the shares or each class or series of shares entitled to vote on the resolutions to be considered by the meeting, those present shall constitute a quorum but otherwise the meeting shall be dissolved.
Any action that may be taken by the shareholders at a meeting may also be taken by a resolution of shareholders consented to in writing or by written electronic communication by a majority or greater number of shares entitled to vote, without the need for any notice, but if not a unanimous writing, a copy of such resolution shall be sent to all non-consenting shareholders.
Pre-emptive Rights. The holders of Ordinary Shares and Preferred Shares are not entitled to any pre-emptive or similar rights.
Conflict of Interests. No agreement or transaction between the Company and one or more of its directors or any person in which any director has a financial interest or to whom any director is related, including as a director of that other person, is void and avoidable for this reason only, or by reason only that the director is present at the meeting of directors, or at the meeting of the committee of directors that approves the agreement or transaction, or that the vote or consent of the director is counted for that purpose, if the material facts of the interest of each director in the agreement or transaction and his interest in or relationship to any other party to the agreement or transaction are disclosed in good faith, or are known by the other directors. A director who has an interest in any particular business to be considered at a meeting of directors or shareholders may be counted for purposes of determining whether the meeting is duly constituted.
Generally, no purchase, redemption or other acquisition of shares shall be made unless the directors determine that immediately after purchase, redemption or other acquisition the Company will be able to satisfy its liabilities as they become due in the ordinary course of its business and the realizable value of the assets of the Company will not be less than the sum of its total liabilities, other than deferred taxes, as shown in the books of account, and its capital and, in the absence of fraud, the decision of the directors as to the realizable value of the assets of the Company is conclusive, unless a question of law is involved.
Duration, Liquidation, Merger. The Company shall continue until wound-up and dissolved by a resolution of shareholders, or under the terms of any insolvency or liquidation laws in force in the BVI. Under BVI law the Company may merge with another company, including a parent company or subsidiary, incorporated in the BVI, or in a jurisdiction outside of the BVI where the laws of that jurisdiction permit the merger. A merger must be authorized by the directors of the Company and approved by the shareholders.
Board of Directors. The business and affairs of the Company are managed by the directors who may exercise all such powers of the Company as are not by BVI law or by the Company’s Articles reserved to the shareholders of the Company.
During the two year period prior to the filing of this Report, the Company did not enter into any material contracts.
There are no exchange control restrictions on payment of dividends on the Company’s Ordinary Shares or on the conduct of the Company’s operations either in Hong Kong, where the Company’s principal executive offices are located, or the BVI, where the Company is incorporated. There are no BVI laws which impose foreign exchange controls on the Company or that effect the payment of dividends, interest, or other payments to non-resident holders of the Company’s securities. BVI laws and the Company’s Memorandum and Articles of Association impose no limitations on the right of non-resident or foreign owners to hold the Company’s securities or vote the Company’s Ordinary Shares. The PRC government has established a unified exchange rate system and system of exchange controls to which the Company is subject.
BVI
The Company is exempted from taxation in the BVI.
HONG KONG
The Company’s subsidiaries organized in Hong Kong, Far East and Euro Tech (China) Limited, provide for Hong Kong profits tax at a rate of 16.5% in 2013 on the basis of their income for financial reporting purposes, adjusting for income and expense items which are not assessable or deductible for profits tax purposes.
PRC
On March 16, 2007, the PRC National People’s Congress passed the Enterprise Income Tax Law (“Income Tax Law”), which became effective January 1, 2008 and applies a unified income tax rate for foreign invested enterprises and domestic enterprise. The Income Tax Law is effective immediately for companies previously subject to higher taxation rates and provides a five-year transition period from its effective date for those enterprises which were established before the effective date of the new tax law and previously entitled to a preferential tax treatment.
On December 26, 2007, the State Council and on February 20, 2008 the Ministry of Finance issued implementation guidelines (“Guidelines”) setting out how the transition of tax rates will occur. The Guidelines state that those enterprises which enjoyed a preferential tax rate of 15% are eligible for a graduated rate increase to 25% over the 5-year period beginning from January 1, 2008. The applicable rates under such an agreements for such enterprises are 24% and 25% for 2011 and 2012 and thereafter, respectively. In addition, foreign investment manufacturing enterprises which have not fully utilised any preferential tax treatments, such as tax holidays or reduced rates of taxation, will be able to continue to receive them during the transitional period. The Company has applied the applicable rates in relation to deferred tax balances.
Euro Tech Trading (Shanghai) Limited (“ETTS”), a subsidiary of the Company, provides for PRC Enterprise Income Tax at a rate of 25% after offsetting losses brought forward, if any, on the basis of its income for financial reporting purposes, adjusting for income and expense items which are not assessable or deductible for PRC Enterprise Income Tax purposes. As of December 31, 2013, ETTS had an assessable loss carried forward of US$374,902 as agreed by the local tax authority to offset its profit for the forth coming years. Such loss will expire in 5 years.
In accordance with the relevant income tax laws and regulations applicable to foreign investment enterprises in the PRC, Shanghai Euro Tech Limited (“SET”), a subsidiary of the Company, provides for the PRC Enterprise Income Tax of 25% with a 50% reduction for 2013. As of December 31, 2013, SET had an assessable loss carried forward of US$580,835 as agreed by the local tax authority to offset its profit for the forth coming years. Such loss will expire in 5 years.
According to the relevant PRC tax rules and regulations, Shanghai Euro Tech Environmental Engineering Limited (“SETEE”) provides for the PRC Enterprise Income Tax of 25%. As of December 31, 2013, SETEE had an assessable loss carried forward of US$1,409,408 as agreed by the local tax authority to offset its profit for the forth coming years. Such loss will expire in 5 years. Chongqing Euro Tech Rizhi Technology Co., Ltd, Rizhi Euro Tech Instrument (Shaanxi) Co., Ltd and Guangzhou Euro Tech Environmental Equipment Co., Ltd provide for PRC Enterprise Income Tax at a rate of 25%, after offsetting losses brought forward, if any, on the basis of its income for financial reporting purposes, adjusting for income and expense items which are not assessable or deductible for PRC Enterprise Income Tax purposes.
According to the relevant PRC tax rules and regulations, Yixing Pact Environmental Technology Co., Ltd is registered in Shanghai as Foreign Owned Enterprise that are entitled to Enterprise Income Tax rate of 25%.
Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”) of the Company provide for PRC Enterprise Income Tax at a rate of 25% after offsetting losses brought forward, if any, on the basis of its income for financial reporting purposes, adjusting for income and expense items which are not assessable or deductible for PRC Enterprise Income Tax purposes.
Under the New Enterprise Income Tax Law and the implementation rules, profits of the PRC subsidiaries earned on or after January 1, 2008 and distributed by the PRC subsidiaries to foreign holding company are subject to a withholding tax at a rate of 10% unless reduced by tax treaty. Aggregate undistributed earnings of the Company’s subsidiaries located in the PRC that are available for distribution to the Company of approximately US$2.0 million at December 31, 2013 are intended to be reinvested, and accordingly, no deferred taxation has been made for the PRC dividend withholding taxes that would be payable upon the distribution of those amounts to the Company. Distributions made out of pre January 1, 2008 retained earnings will not be subject to the withholding tax.
The principle reconciling items from income tax computed at the statutory rates and at the effective income tax rates are as follows:
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
US$’000
|
|
|
US$’000
|
|
|
US$’000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computed tax using respective companies’ statutory tax rates
|
|
|
(49)
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
Change in valuation allowances
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Under-provision for income tax in prior years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Non deductible expenses
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
177
|
|
Total provision for income tax at effective tax rate
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
PRC statutory reserves.
Under the relevant PRC laws and regulations, the PRC subsidiaries are required to appropriate certain percentage of their respective net income to two statutory funds i.e. the statutory reserve fund and the statutory staff welfare fund. The PRC subsidiaries can also appropriate certain amount of their net income to the enterprise expansion fund.
(i) Statutory reserve fund
Pursuant to applicable PRC laws and regulations, the PRC subsidiaries are required to allocate at least 10% of the companies’ net income to the statutory reserve fund until such fund reaches 50% of their respective registered capital. The statutory reserve fund can be utilized upon the approval by the relevant authorities, to offset accumulated losses or to increase registered capital of the companies, provided that such fund be maintained at a minimum of 25% of the companies’ registered capital.
Under the PRC laws and regulations, the Company’s PRC subsidiaries are restricted in their ability to transfer certain of their net assets to the Company in the form of dividend payments, loans or advances. The amounts restricted include paid-in capital and statutory reserves, as determined pursuant to PRC generally accepted accounting principles, totaling US$3,357,000 as at December 31, 2013.
(ii) Statutory staff welfare fund
Pursuant to applicable PRC laws and regulations, the PRC subsidiaries are required to allocate certain amount of their respective net income to the staff welfare funds determined by the Company. The staff welfare funds can only be used to provide staff welfare facilities and other collective benefits to their employees. This fund is non-distributable other than upon liquidation of the PRC subsidiaries.
(iii) Enterprise expansion fund
The expansion fund shall only be used to make up losses, expand the PRC respective subsidiaries’ production operations, or increase the capital of the subsidiaries. The expansion fund can be utilized upon approval by relevant authorities, to convert into registered capital and issue bonus capital to existing investors, provided that such fund be maintained at a minimum of 25% of the companies’ registered capital.
UNITED STATES
The following discussion is a summary of the material United States federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to the purchase, holding, ownership, disposition or sale of our ordinary shares.
This discussion is general in nature and does not discuss all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation which may be important to particular investors in light of their individual circumstances, including investors subject to special U.S. taxation rules.
A U.S. Holder holding or considering acquiring or disposing of our ordinary shares is urged to consult his or her own tax advisor concerning the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. income and other tax consequences of the holding, ownership, purchase, disposition or sale of our ordinary shares in light of such U.S. Holder’s particular circumstances.
A “U.S. Holder” for purposes of this discussion is a beneficial owner of ordinary shares that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes: (a) a citizen or resident of the United States; (b) a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof, or the District of Columbia; (c) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation, regardless of its source; or (d) a trust if it is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person. If a partnership holds our ordinary shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A partner of a partnership holding our ordinary shares is urged to consult its own tax advisor regarding an investment in our ordinary shares.
Passive foreign investment company rules. A passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for any taxable year in which either (a) at least 75% of our gross income is passive income or (b) at least 50% of the value (determined on the basis of a quarterly average) of our assets is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. For this purpose, passive income generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents (other than rents and royalties derived in the active conduct of a trade or business and not derived from a related person), annuities and gains from assets that produce passive income.
The annual PFIC determination to be made by a U.S. Holder of our ordinary shares is an inherently factual determination and there is limited guidance regarding the application of the PFIC rules to specific situations. Although the determination of PFIC status is subject to factual uncertainties because it depends upon the valuation of our ordinary shares as well as our goodwill and other assets and income. In addition, as the determination of PFIC status is made on an annual basis and depends on variables over which we have limited control, there can be no assurance that we will not be classified as a PFIC for 2012 or any future calendar years.
If we are determined to be a PFIC for any taxable year, a U. S. Holder could be treated as owning a proportionate share of some of our subsidiaries and, in the absence of certain elections, will subject to special rules that will have a penalizing effect on certain “excess distributions” (as defined).
A U. S Holder that holds our Ordinary Shares in any year in which we are classified as a PFIC may make a “deemed sale” election with respect to such ordinary shares in a subsequent taxable year in which we are not classified as a PFIC. If you make a valid deemed sale election with respect to your Ordinary Shares, you will be treated as having sold all of your Ordinary Shares for their fair market value on the last day of the last taxable year in which we were a PFIC and such Ordinary Shares will no longer be treated as PFIC stock. You will recognize gain (but not loss), which will be subject to tax as an “excess distribution” received on the last day of the last taxable year in which we were a PFIC. Your basis in the Ordinary Shares would be increased to reflect gain recognized, and your holding period would begin on the day after we ceased to be a PFIC.
Also, a U. S. Holder may be required to file certain forms with the U.S. Treasury Department.
A U.S. Holder will generally recognize capital gain or loss upon the sale or other disposition of our Ordinary Shares in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized upon the disposition and the holder’s adjusted tax basis in such ordinary shares. Any capital gain or loss will be long-term if the Ordinary Shares have been held for more than one year and will generally be United States source gain or loss for United States foreign tax credit purposes.
Certain U.S. Holders are required to report information to the Internal Revenue Service relating to an interest in “specified foreign financial assets,” including shares issued by a non-United States corporation, for any year in which the aggregate value of all specified foreign financial assets exceeds $50,000 (or a higher dollar amount prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service), subject to certain exceptions. These rules also impose penalties if a holder is required to submit such information to the Internal Revenue Service and fails to do so.
The documents that are exhibits to or incorporated by reference in this annual report can be read at the U.S. SEC’s public reference facilities at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549-2001 or on the Commission’s website: www.sec.gov.
For information on the Company’s subsidiaries see Item 4C. The separate financial statements of Blue Sky, as required under Regulation S-X 210.3-09, an entity in which the Company owns a 20% equity interest are attached hereto. However, the Company is also required to, per that Regulation, to submit the separate financial statements of Jia Huan and it is unable to do so at this time but intends to appropriately amend this filing to comply with that Regulation when the financial statements of Jia Huan are ready.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
The Company’s primary risk exposures arise from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchanges rates. Foreign Currency Risks
The Company is exposed to risk from changing foreign currency exchange rates. The Company’s sales are denominated either in HK dollar or RMB. The majority of the Company’s expenses and cost of revenue are denominated in HK dollars, followed by RMB, US dollars, Japanese yen and the Euro. The Company is subject to a variety of risks associated with changes among the relative value of the US dollar, HK dollar, RMB, Japanese yen and the Euro. The Company does not currently adequately hedge its foreign exchange positions. Any material increase in the value of the HK dollar, RMB, Japanese yen and the Euro relative to the US dollar would increase the Company’s expenses and cost of revenue and therefore would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Inflation
The Company cannot accurately determine the precise effect of inflation on its operations, it does not believe inflation has had a material effect on sales or results of operations during the past several years. Efforts by the PRC to curb inflation may also curb economic growth, increase our overhead costs and adversely affect our sales. If the PRC rate of inflation continues to increase, the Chinese government may introduce further measures intended to reduce the inflation rate in the PRC. Any such measures adopted by the Chinese government may not be successful in reducing or slowing the increase in the PRC’s inflation rate. Sustained or increased inflation in the PRC may have an adverse impact on the PRC’s economy and may materially and adversely affect our business and financial results.
The Company is currently not exposed to material future earnings or cash flow exposures from changes in interest rates on debt obligations as the Company had no bank indebtedness in Fiscal 2013. The Company does not currently anticipate entering into interest rate swaps and/or similar instruments.
|
MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITYHOLDERS
|
In November 2011 and February 2012 the Company restated its Memorandum and Articles of Association. In January of 2012, the Company combined or reverse split each eleven of its outstanding Ordinary Shares into two shares of its Ordinary Shares. The reason for the foregoing was to comply with NASDAQ Listing Rules.
On September 20, 2011, the Company received a deficiency letter from NASDAQ that the Company was no longer in compliance with NASDAQ’s listing maintenance rule for failing to have a bid price of at least US$ 1.00 per share for the prior thirty trading days. In order to regain compliance, in January 2012, the Company effected a combination or reverse split of its Ordinary Shares.
To facilitate the combination, Company changed the par value of its Ordinary Shares from US$ 0.01 per share to no par value.
Company had been originally incorporated under the International Business Companies Act (the “IBC” Act). On January 1, 2005 the BVI Business Companies Act, (as amended, the “BC Act”) came into force, with the objective of replacing the IBC Act over a 2 year transitional period.
On January 1, 2007, the Company was automatically re-registered under the BC Act as a BVI Business Company. Companies that were so automatically re-registered were not required to submit new Memorandum and Articles of Association and certain key sections of the IBC Act were “grandfathered” into the BC Act. See Item 10B. Memorandum and Articles of Association. In December 2011 and January 2012, the Company filed Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association with the Registry of Corporate Affairs of the BVI Financial Services Commission to, among other things, (i) not apply the Transitional Provisions and (ii) remove these concepts from the Company's charter documents eliminating a layer of requirements that would otherwise apply to share divisions (splits), combinations (reverse splits), redemptions and dividends. The Company's accounting treatment of share capital need not change. Changes in the Company's Amended and Restated Memorandum are summarized in the Company's Forms 6-K filed with the SEC on November 30, 2011 and February 6, 2012.The foregoing Forms 6-K are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully stated herein. This description and the descriptions contained in the Forms 6-K incorporated by reference do not purport to be complete and are qualified in the entirety by reference to BVI statutory law and the Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association.
(a)
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
|
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d -15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 20-F. Based on such evaluation, they have concluded that as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective and designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable SEC rules and forms and they effectively ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, allowing for timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
(b)
|
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
|
Our management, under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of our consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making this assessment, they used the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this assessment, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2013, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems were determined to be effective they may not prevent or detect misstatements and can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
(c)
|
Changes in Internal Controls
|
There were no changes in our internal controls that occurred during the period covered by our annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
|
The Committee includes one non-employee director who meets the independence and “financial expert” requirements and two other members who meet the independence requirements of the NASDAQ listing standards and the rules and regulations of the SEC. The Committee includes Messrs. Y.K. Liang, Ka Chong Cheang and Li Da Weng. Mr. Y.K. Liang is the “financial expert” on that committee. See Mr. Liang’s biographical data in “Item 6A. Directors and Senior Management.” contained in this Report.
Our Board of Directors has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees, including certain provisions that specifically apply to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and any other persons who perform similar functions for us. The Company agrees to undertake to provide to any person without charge, a copy of our code of business conduct and ethics within ten working days after we receive such person’s written request addressed to our offices set forth on the cover page of this Report.
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES ANDSERVICES.
|
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees by categories specified below in connection with certain professional services rendered by Dominic K. F. Chan & Co. (“DKPC”) who were are principal external auditors for 2013, 2012 and 2011.
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit fees(1)
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
106,000
|
|
Audit-related fees(2)
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Tax fees(3)
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
All other fees
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Our Audit Committee has adopted a pre-approval policy for the engagement of our independent accountant to perform permitted audit and non-audit services. Under this policy, which is designed to assure that such engagements do not impair the independence of our auditors, the Audit Committee pre-approves annually a range of specific audit and non-audit services in the categories of Audit Service, Audit-Related Services, Tax Services and other services that may be performed by our independent accountants, and the maximum pre-approved fees that may be paid as compensation for each pre-approved service in those categories. Any proposed services exceeding the maximum pre-approved fees require specific approval by the Audit Committee.
__________________
(1)
|
“Audit fees” means the aggregate fees billed in each of the fiscal years listed for professional services rendered by our principal auditors for the audit of our annual financial statements.
|
(2)
|
“Audit-related fees” means the aggregate fees billed in each of the fiscal years listed for assurance and related services by our principal auditors that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit fees.” Services comprising the fees disclosed under the category of “Audit-related fees” involve principally the performance of certain agreed upon procedures for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 respectively.
|
(3)
|
“Tax fees” means the aggregated fees billed in each of the years listed for professional services rendered by our principal auditors for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
|
|
EXEMPTIONS FROM LISTING STANDARDS
|
The Company is a “Controlled Company” as defined in NASDAQ’s corporate governance rules as a majority of our shares are owned by a “control group” consisting of T.C. Leung and Pearl Venture Ltd., who have disclosed their “control group” status in their filings with the Commission. So long as that “controlled company” status remains in effect, the Company will be exempt from certain of NASDAQ corporate governance rules that, including among other things, would require: (a) a majority of our directors be independent; (b) the compensation of our chief executive officer be determined or recommended by independent directors; and (c) director nominations be determined or recommended by independent directors.
The Company believes it is in compliance with NASDAQ’s corporate governance rules as in effect and intends to comply with the changes to said rules no later than the date that they become effective.
|
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
|
During the period of time from November 2008 through March 2009, T.C. Leung, our Chief Executive Officer and principal shareholder, either directly or through an entity beneficially owned by him (Regent Earning Ltd “Regent”), purchased 1,418 shares in the open market from time to time at prices ranging from US$ 2.86 to US$ 5.72, at an average price per share of US$ 4.29.
In November 2008, the Company adopted a program to repurchase up to 54,546 of its issued and outstanding Ordinary Shares by December 31, 2009. This gave the Company the ability to purchase the shares in the open market or through negotiated or block transactions from time to time based on market and business conditions. Under this program the Company the Company purchased 54,552 of its Ordinary Shares at prices ranging from US$ 2.48 to US$ 6.55 with an average price per share of US$ 4.84.
In July 2009, the Company adopted another program to repurchase up to an additional 54,546 of its issued and outstanding Ordinary Shares by July 31, 2010. As of July 31, 2010, 11,843 of the Company’s Ordinary Shares had been purchased by the Company under this additional program at prices ranging from US$ 4.73 to US$ 9.52 with an average price per share of US$ 7.54.
In August 2010, the Company adopted another program to repurchase up to an additional 54,546 of its issued and outstanding ordinary shares by August 2, 2011 that was thereafter extended until August 2, 2012. As of March 31, 2012, 32,056 of the Company’s Ordinary Shares have been purchased by the Company under this additional program at prices ranging from US$ 2.20 to US$ 8.80 with an average price per share of US$ 5.49.
PART III
The following financial statements are filed as part of this annual report on Form 20-F.
Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated balance sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zhejiang Tianlan Environmental Protection Technology Company Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows and changes in Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
Lists of Exhibits
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association (1)
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amendments to Exhibit 3.1 ( 2)
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
Registrant’s Audit Committee Charter (3)
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries *
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
|
|