innv10k_dec312014.htm
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014
Commission file number: 000-52991
INNOVUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
90-0814124
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
9171 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 440, San Diego, CA |
92122 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(Zip code) |
Registrant’s telephone number: 858-964-5123
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act: None.
Securities registered under Section 12 (g) of the Act:
Common Stock $0.001 par value
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files) Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company:
Large accelerated filer
|
¨
|
Accelerated filed
|
¨
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
¨
|
Smaller reporting company
|
x
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2014, based on the closing sales price of the common stock as quoted on the OTCQB Market was $2,980,911. For purposes of this computation, all officers, directors, and 5 percent beneficial owners of the registrant are deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed an admission that such directors, officers, or 5 percent beneficial owners are, in fact, affiliates of the registrant.
Outstanding Shares
As of March 24, 2015, the registrant had 40,545,545 shares of common stock outstanding.
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes the accounts of Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Innovus Pharma”), together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, as follows, collectively referred to as “we”, “us” or the “Company”: Semprae Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Semprae”), FasTrack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“FasTrack”) and Novalere, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Novalere”).
“Zestra®”, “Zestra Glide®”, “EjectDelay®”, “Sensum+®”, “Vesele®” and other trademarks and intellectual property of ours appearing in this report are our property. This report contains additional trade names and trademarks of other companies. We do not intend our use or display of other companies’ trade names or trademarks to imply an endorsement or sponsorship of us by such companies, or any relationship with any of these companies.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this report, including information incorporated by reference, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Forward-looking statements reflect current views about future events and financial performance based on certain assumptions. They include opinions, forecasts, intentions, plans, goals, projections, guidance, expectations, beliefs or other statements that are not statements of historical fact. Words such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expects,” “plans,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “approximates,” “predicts,” or “projects,” or the negative or other variation of such words, and similar expressions may identify a statement as a forward-looking statement. Any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our business, our goals, strategies, focus and plans, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including statements expressing general optimism about future operating results and the development of our products, are forward-looking statements.
Although forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by us. Consequently, forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties and actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in or anticipated by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences in results and outcomes include, without limitation, those specifically addressed under the heading “Risks Factors” below, as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Readers are urged not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). You can read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You can obtain additional information about the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including us.
We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect any event or circumstance that may arise after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made throughout the entirety of this annual Report, which attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Overview
We are an emerging pharmaceutical company engaged in the commercialization, licensing, and development of safe and effective non-prescription medicine and consumer care products to improve men’s and women’s health and vitality and respiratory diseases. We deliver innovative and uniquely presented and packaged health solutions through our over-the-counter, (“OTC”) medicines and consumer and health products, which we market directly or through commercial partners to primary care physicians, urologists, gynecologists and therapists, and directly to consumers through on-line channels, retailers and wholesalers. Our business model leverages our ability to acquire and in-license commercial products that are supported by scientific, and or clinical evidence, place them through our existing supply chain, retail and on-line channels to tap new markets and drive demand for such products and to establish physician relationships. We currently market five products in the United States and in 28 countries around the world through our commercial partners.
Corporate Structure
We incorporated in the State of Nevada. In December 2011, we merged with FasTrack Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and changed our name to “Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.”
In December 2013, we acquired Semprae, which had two commercial products in the U.S. and Canada, as a result of which, Semprae became our wholly-owned subsidiary.
In February 2015, we entered into a merger agreement, whereby we acquired Novalere and its worldwide rights to the Fluticare™ brand (Fluticasone propionate nasal spray). We expect that the Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) filed in November 2014 with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) may be approved by the end of 2015 or in the first half of 2016, which will allow us to market and sell Fluticare™ over the counter.
Our Strategy
Our corporate strategy focuses on two primary objectives:
|
1.
|
Developing a diversified product portfolio of exclusive, unique and patented non-prescription pharmaceutical and consumer health products through: (a) the acquisition of products or obtaining exclusive rights to market such products; and (b) the introduction of line extensions and reformulations of currently marketed products; and
|
|
2.
|
Building an innovative, global sales and marketing model through commercial partnerships with established complimentary partners that: (a) generates revenue; and (b) requires a lower cost structure compared to traditional pharmaceutical companies.
|
We believe that our proven ability to market, license, acquire and develop brand name non-prescription pharmaceutical and consumer health products uniquely positions us to commercialize our products and grow in this market in a differentiated way. The following are additional details about our strategy:
● |
Focusing on acquisition of commercial, non-prescription pharmaceutical and consumer health products that are well aligned with current therapeutic areas of male and female sexual health, pain, vitality and respiratory diseases. In general, we seek non-prescription pharmaceutical and consumer health products that are already marketed with scientific and/or clinical data and evidence that are aligned with our therapeutic areas, which we then can grow through promotion to physicians and expanding sales through our existing retail and online channels and commercial partners on a worldwide basis. We have done this through our acquisitions of (1) Ex-U.S. rights to Sensum+® from Centric Research Institute, or CRI, (2) Zestra® and Zestra® Glide from Semprae, (3) Vesele® from Trōphikōs, (4) US and Canada rights to Androferti® from Laboratorios Q Pharma (Spain) and (5) FlutiCare® from Novalere; |
|
|
● |
Increasing the number of U.S. non-exclusive distribution channel partners for direct and online sales and also open more channels directly to physicians, urologists, gynecologists and therapists. One of our goals is to increase the number of U.S. distribution channel partners that sell our products. To do this, we have devised a three-pronged approach. First, we are seeking to expand the number of OTC direct selling partners, such as the larger in-store distributors, and to expand sales to the more regional, statewide and local distributors, such as regional pharmacy chains, large grocery stores and supplement and health stores. Second, we are working to expand our online presence through relationships with well-known online sellers that we believe have sufficient customers to warrant our relationship with them. Third, we are seeking to expand sales of our OTC products directly through sampling programs and detailing to physicians, urologists, gynecologists, therapists and to other healthcare providers who generally are used to recommending to their patients products that are supported by strong scientific and/or clinical data and evidence;
|
|
|
● |
Seeking commercial partnerships outside the U.S. and developing consistent international commercial and distribution systems. We seek to develop a strong network of international distribution partners outside of the U.S. To do so, we are relying in part on past relationships that Dr. Bassam Damaj, our President and Chief Executive Officer, has had with certain commercial partners globally. In addition, we believe we have the ability to develop new relationships with commercial distributors who can demonstrate they have leading positions in their regions and can provide us with effective marketing and sales efforts and teams to detail our products physicians and therapists. Our commercial partners outside the U.S. are responsible for storing, distributing and promoting our products to physicians, urologists, gynecologists, therapists and to other healthcare providers. We have already entered into 6 commercial partnerships covering our products in 28 countries outside the U.S.;
|
|
|
● |
Developing a proprietary patent portfolio to protect the therapeutic products and categories we desire to enter. We have filed and are working to secure patent claims in the U.S. and abroad covering product inventions and innovations that we believe are valuable. These patents, if issued and ultimately found to be valid, may enable us to create a barrier to entry for competitors on a worldwide basis; and |
|
|
● |
Achievingcost economies of scale from lower cost manufacturing, integrated distribution channels and multiple product discounts. We believe that we can achieve higher gross margins per product by shifting manufacturing to lower cost manufacturers. We also feel that we can acquire other OTC and consumer healthcare products and reintroduce them into our networks utilizing our integrated distribution channels, thus receiving multiple product economies of scale from our distribution partners. |
|
|
Our Products
Marketed Products
We have five products that are currently being marketed: (1) Zestra® , a non-medicated, patented consumer care product that has been clinically proven to increase desire, arousal, and satisfaction in women; (2) EjectDelay®, an OTC monograph-compliant benzocaine-based topical gel for treating premature ejaculation; (3) Sensum+®, a non-medicated consumer care cream that increases penile sensitivity (ex-U.S.); (4) Zestra Glide® , a clinically-tested high viscosity low osmolality water-based lubricant; and (5) Vesele ®, a proprietary and novel oral dietary supplement to maximize nitric oxide beneficial clinical effects on sexual functions and brain health. Vesele ® contains a patented formulation of L-Arginine and L-Citrulline in combination with the natural absorption enhancer Bioperine®. While we generate revenue from the sale of our five products, most revenue is currently generated by Zestra®, Zestra® Glide, EjectDelay® and Sensum +®.
Zestra®
Zestra® is our proprietary blend of essential oils proven in two peer-reviewed and published U.S. placebo controlled clinical trials in 276 women to increase desire, arousal and satisfaction. Zestra® is commercialized in the U.S. and Canada through retailers such as Walmart, drug wholesalers such as McKesson and Cardinal Health and online.
Female Sexual Arousal Disorder, or FSAD, is a disorder part of the Female Sexual Dysfunction, or FSD, and is characterized by the persistent or recurrent inability to attain sexual arousal or to maintain arousal until completion of sexual activity. Forty-three percent (43%) of women age 18-59 experience some sort of sexual difficulties with no approved prescription products. The arousal liquid market is estimated to be around $500 million on a worldwide basis. Zestra® achieved 0.5% of the US and Canada market share in 2013.
EjectDelay®
EjectDelay® is our proprietary, clinical proven OTC 7.5% benzocaine gel for premature ejaculation. Benzocaine acts to inhibit the voltage-dependent sodium channels on the nerve membrane, stopping the propagation of the action potential and resulting in temporary numbing of the application site. EjectDelay® is applied to the head of the penis ten minutes before intercourse. Premature Ejaculation, or PE, is the absence of voluntary control over ejaculation resulting in ejaculation either preceding vaginal entry or occurring immediately upon vaginal entry and is defined as an ejaculation latency time of less than one minute. It is estimated that over 30% of males suffer from PE with a market size of $1 billion with a 10.3% annual growth rate. (The Journal of Sexual Medicine in 2007 Sex Med 2007) Topical anesthetics make up 14% of the total PE market.
Sensum+®
Sensum+® is a non-medicated cream which moisturizes the head and shaft of the penis for enhanced feelings of sensation and greater sexual satisfaction. It is a patent-pending blend of essential oils and ingredients generally recognized as safe that recently commenced marketing in the U.S. We acquired the global ex-U.S. distribution rights to Sensum+® from CRI. The safety and efficacy of Sensum+® was evaluated in two post-marketing survey studies in circumcised and non-circumcised men. A total of 382 men used Sensum+® twice daily for 14 consecutive days followed by once daily for eight weeks and as needed thereafter. Users reported a ~50% increase in penile sensitivity with the use of Sensum+®.
Zestra Glide®
Zestra Glide® is a clinically-tested water-based longer lasting lubricant. We acquired Zestra Glide in our acquisition of Semprae in December 2013. In a 57 patient safety clinical study, Zestra Glide® proved to be safe and caused no irritation or skin side effects during the six week trial. To our knowledge, Zestra Glide is the only water-based lubricant clinically tested for safety and has a viscosity of over 16000cps on the market. Increased viscosity usually translates into longer effects. The lubricant market is estimated to be around $200 million in the U.S.
Vesele®
Vesele® is a proprietary oral supplement of Arginine with high absorption backed with strong clinical use data in men and women for sexual dysfunction. Vesele® contains a patented formulation of L-Arginine and L-Citrulline in combination with the natural absorption enhancer Bioperine®. The beneficial effects of Vesele® on sexual and cognitive functions were confirmed in a four month US clinical survey study involving 152 patients (69 men and 83 women). Results from the clinical survey have indicated (1) improvement of erectile hardness and maintenance in men and increased sexual intercourse frequency with their partners and (2) lubrication in women, when taken separately by each. Positive effects on brain health were translated by an increase in recall of words and names.
Pipeline Products
Androferti®
On January 28, 2015, we entered into an exclusive distribution agreement with Laboratorios Q Pharma (Spain) to distribute and commercialize Androferti in the U.S. by ourselves and in Canada through our partner. Androferti is a natural supplement that supports overall male reproductive health and sperm quality. Androferti®, has been shown in multiple published clinical trials to statistically increase seminal quality (concentration, motility, morphology and vitality) and enhances spermatozoa quality (decreases of vacuoles in the sperm nucleus, decreases DNA fragmentation, decreases the dynamics of sperm DNA fragmentation, and improvement on the inventory of mobile sperms.
Fluticare™ (Fluticasone propionate nasal spray)
We expect that the ANDA filed in November 2014 with the FDA may be approved by the end of 2015 or in the first half of 2016 which will allow the Company to market and sell Fluticare™ over the counter. FlutiCareTM is a nasal spray in the form of Fluticasone propionate that has been the most prescribed nasal spray to patients in the U.S. for more than five consecutive years. The nasal steroid market is over $1 billion annually in the U.S.
Sales and Marketing Strategy
Our sales and marketing strategy is based on (a) working with direct commercial channel partners in the U.S. and also directly marketing the products ourselves to physicians, urologists, gynecologists and therapists and to other healthcare providers and (b) working with exclusive commercial partners outside of the U.S. that would be responsible for sales and marketing in those territories. We market and distribute our products in the U.S. through retailers, wholesalers and online channels. The Company promotes its products directly to physicians, urologists, gynecologists and therapists and to other healthcare providers through a co-promotion partnership with Consortia Health.Our strategy outside the U.S. is to partner with companies who can effectively market and sell our products in their countries through their direct marketing and sales teams. The strategy of using our partners to commercialize our products is designed to limit our expenses and fix our cost structure, enabling us to increase our reach while minimizing the incremental spending impact on the Company.
Manufacturers and Single Source Suppliers
We use third-party manufacturers for the production of our products for development and commercial purposes. We believe there is currently excess capacity for manufacturing in the marketplace and opportunities to lower manufacturing cost through outsourcing to regions and countries that can do it on a more cost-effective basis. Some of our products are currently available only from sole or limited suppliers. We currently have multiple contract manufacturers for our multiple products, and we issue purchase orders to these suppliers each time we require replenishment of our product inventory. All of our current manufacturers are based in the U.S. and we are looking to establish contract manufacturing for certain of our products in Europe and the Middle Eastern and Northern Africa region to reduce the cost and risk of supply chain to our current and potential commercial partners in their territories.
Government Regulation
Our products are normally subject to regulatory approval or must comply with various U.S. and international regulatory requirements. Unlike pharmaceutical companies who primarily sell prescription products, we currently sell drug or health products into the OTC market. While prescription products normally must progress from pre-clinical to clinical to FDA approval and then can be marketed and sold, our products are normally subject to conformity to FDA monograph requirements and similar requirements in other countries, which requires a shorter time frame for us to satisfy regulatory requirements and permits us to begin commercialization.
Below is a brief description of the FDA regulatory process for the Company’s products in the U.S.
US Food and Drug Administration
The FDA and other federal, state, local and foreign regulatory agencies impose substantial requirements upon the clinical development, approval, labeling, manufacture, marketing and distribution of drug products. These agencies regulate, among other things, research and development activities and the testing, approval, manufacture, quality control, safety, effectiveness, labeling, storage, record keeping, advertising and promotion of our product candidates. The regulatory approval process is generally lengthy and expensive, with no guarantee of a positive result. Moreover, failure to comply with applicable FDA or other requirements may result in civil or criminal penalties, recall or seizure of products, injunctive relief including partial or total suspension of production, or withdrawal of a product from the market.
The FDA regulates, among other things, the research, manufacture, promotion and distribution of drugs in the US under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or the FFDCA, and other statutes and implementing regulations. The process required by the FDA before prescription drug product candidates may be marketed in the United States generally involves the following:
|
·
|
completion of extensive nonclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies, all performed in accordance with the FDA’s Good Laboratory Practice regulations;
|
|
·
|
submission to the FDA of an investigational new drug application, or IND, which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin;
|
|
·
|
for some products, performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with the FDA’s regulations, including Good Clinical Practices, to establish the safety and efficacy of the product candidate for each proposed indication;
|
|
·
|
submission to the FDA of a new drug application, or NDA;
|
|
·
|
submission to the FDA of an abbreviated new drug application, or ANDA
|
|
·
|
satisfactory completion of an FDA preapproval inspection of the manufacturing facilities at which the product is produced to assess compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practice, or cGMP, regulations; and
|
|
·
|
FDA review and approval of the NDA prior to any commercial marketing, sale or shipment of the drug.
|
The testing and approval process requires substantial time, effort and financial resources, and we cannot be certain that any approvals for our product candidates will be granted on a timely basis, if at all.
Nonclinical tests include laboratory evaluations of product chemistry, formulation and stability, as well as studies to evaluate toxicity in animals and other animal studies. The results of nonclinical tests, together with manufacturing information and analytical data, are submitted as part of an IND to the FDA. Some nonclinical testing may continue even after an IND is submitted. The IND also includes one or more protocols for the initial clinical trial or trials and an investigator’s brochure. An IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA, within the 30-day time period, raises concerns or questions relating to the proposed clinical trials as outlined in the IND and places the clinical trial on a clinical hold. In such cases, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns or questions before any clinical trials can begin. Clinical trial holds also may be imposed at any time before or during studies due to safety concerns or non-compliance with regulatory requirements. An independent institutional review board, or IRB, at each of the clinical centers proposing to conduct the clinical trial must review and approve the plan for any clinical trial before it commences. An IRB considers, among other things, whether the risks to individuals participating in the trials are minimized and are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits. The IRB also approves the consent form signed by the trial participants and must monitor the study until completed.
Abbreviated New Drug Application
An ANDA contains data which when submitted to FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Generic Drugs, provides for the review and ultimate approval of a generic drug product. Once approved, an applicant may manufacture and market the generic drug product to provide a safe, effective, low cost alternative to the public than a bioequivalent prescription product.
A generic drug product is one that is comparable to an innovator drug product in dosage form, strength, route of administration, quality, performance characteristics and intended use. Generic drug applications are termed "abbreviated" because they are generally not required to include preclinical (animal) and clinical (human) data to establish safety and effectiveness. Instead, generic applicants must scientifically demonstrate that their product is bioequivalent (i.e., performs in the same manner as the innovator drug). One way scientists demonstrate bioequivalence is to measure the time it takes the generic drug to reach the bloodstream in 24 to 36 healthy, volunteers. This gives them the rate of absorption, or bioavailability, of the generic drug, which they can then compare to that of the innovator drug. The generic version must deliver the same amount of active ingredients into a patient's bloodstream in the same amount of time as the innovator drug.
Using bioequivalence as the basis for approving generic copies of drug products was established by the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, also known as the Waxman-Hatch Act. This Act expedites the availability of less costly generic drugs by permitting FDA to approve applications to market generic versions of brand-name drugs without conducting costly and duplicative clinical trials. At the same time, the Act granted companies the ability to apply for up to five additional years of patent protection for the innovator drugs developed to make up for time lost while their products were going through the FDA's approval process. Brand-name drugs are subject to the same bioequivalence tests as generics upon reformulation.
BioEquivalency Studies
Studies to measure bioavailability and/or establish bioequivalence of a product are important elements in support of investigational new drug applications, or INDs, new drug applications, or NDAs, ANDAs, and their supplements. As part of INDs and NDAs for orally administered drug products, bioavailability studies focus on determining the process by which a drug is released from the oral dosage form and moves to the site of action. Bioavailability data provide an estimate of the fraction of the drug absorbed, as well as its subsequent distribution and elimination. Bioavailability can be generally documented by a systemic exposure profile obtained by measuring drug and/or metabolite concentration in the systemic circulation over time. The systemic exposure profile determined during clinical trials in the IND period can serve as a benchmark for subsequent bioequivalence studies. Studies to establish bioequivalence between two products are important for certain changes before approval for a pioneer product in NDA and ANDA submissions and in the presence of certain post-approval changes in NDAs and ANDAs. In bioequivalence studies, an applicant compares the systemic exposure profile of a test drug product to that of a reference drug product. For two orally or intra-nasally administered drug products to be bioequivalent, the active drug ingredient or active moiety in the test product must exhibit the same rate.
OTC Monograph Process
The FDA regulates certain non-prescription drugs using an OTC Monograph which, when final, is published in the Code of Federal Regulations at 21 C.F.R. Parts 330-358. Such products that meet each of the conditions established in the OTC Monograph regulations, as well as all other applicable regulations, may be marketed without prior approval by the FDA.
The general conditions set forth for OTC Monograph products include, among other things:
|
•
|
the product is manufactured at FDA registered establishments and in accordance with cGMPs;
|
|
•
|
the product label meets applicable format and content requirements including permissible “Indications” and all required dosing instructions and limitations, warnings, precautions and contraindications that have been established in an applicable OTC Monograph;
|
|
•
|
the product contains only permissible active ingredients in permissible strengths and dosage forms;
|
|
•
|
the product contains only suitable inactive ingredients which are safe in the amounts administered and do not interfere with the effectiveness of the preparation; and
|
|
•
|
the product container and container components meet FDA’s requirements.
|
The advertising for OTC drug products is regulated by the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, which generally requires that advertising claims be truthful, not misleading, and substantiated by adequate and reliable scientific evidence. False, misleading, or unsubstantiated OTC drug advertising may be subject to FTC enforcement action and may also be challenged in court by competitors or others under the federal Lanham Act or similar state laws. Penalties for false or misleading advertising may include monetary fines or judgments as well as injunctions against further dissemination of such advertising claims.
A product marketed pursuant to an OTC Monograph must be listed with the FDA’s Drug Regulation and Listing System and have a National Drug Code listing which is required for all marketed drug products. After marketing, the FDA may test the product or otherwise investigate the manufacturing and development of the product to ensure compliance with the OTC Monograph. Should the FDA determine that a product is not marketed in compliance with the OTC Monograph or is advertised outside of its regulations, the FDA may require corrective action up to and including market withdrawal and recall.
Other Regulatory Requirements
Maintaining substantial compliance with appropriate federal, state, local and international statutes and regulations requires the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Drug manufacturers are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies, and after approval, the FDA and these state agencies conduct periodic unannounced inspections to ensure continued compliance with ongoing regulatory requirements, including cGMPs. In addition, after approval, some types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes and additional labeling claims, are subject to further FDA review and approval. The FDA may require post-approval testing and surveillance programs to monitor safety and the effectiveness of approved products that have been commercialized. Any drug products manufactured or distributed by us pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including:
|
•
|
meeting record-keeping requirements;
|
|
•
|
reporting of adverse experiences with the drug;
|
|
•
|
providing the FDA with updated safety and efficacy information;
|
|
•
|
reporting on advertisements and promotional labeling;
|
|
•
|
drug sampling and distribution requirements; and
|
|
•
|
complying with electronic record and signature requirements.
|
In addition, the FDA strictly regulates labeling, advertising, promotion and other types of information on products that are placed on the market. There are numerous regulations and policies that govern various means for disseminating information to health-care professionals as well as consumers, including to industry sponsored scientific and educational activities, information provided to the media and information provided over the Internet. Drugs may be promoted only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label.
The FDA has very broad enforcement authority and the failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in administrative or judicial sanctions being imposed on us or on the manufacturers and distributors of our approved products, including warning letters, refusals of government contracts, clinical holds, civil penalties, injunctions, restitution, and disgorgement of profits, recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, withdrawal of approvals, refusal to approve pending applications, and criminal prosecution resulting in fines and incarceration. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label or unapproved uses may be subject to significant liability. In addition, even after regulatory approval is obtained, later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product may result in restrictions on the product or even complete withdrawal of the product from the market.
Competition
The OTC pharmaceutical market is highly competitive with many established manufacturers, suppliers and distributors that are actively engaged in all phases of the business. We believe that competition in the sale of our products will be based primarily on efficacy, regulatory compliance, brand awareness, availability, product safety and price. Our brand name OTC pharmaceutical products may be subject to competition from alternate therapies during the period of patent protection and thereafter from generic or other competitive products. All of our existing products and products we have agreements to acquire compete with generic and other competitive products in the marketplace.
Competing in the branded product business requires us to identify and quickly bring to market new products embodying technological innovations. Successful marketing of branded products depends primarily on the ability to communicate the efficacy, safety and value to healthcare professionals in private practice, group practices and managed care organizations. We anticipate that our branded product offerings will support our existing lines of therapeutic focus. Based upon business conditions and other factors, we regularly reexamine our business strategies and may from time to time reallocate our resources from one therapeutic area to another, withdraw from a therapeutic area or add an additional therapeutic area in order to maximize our overall growth opportunities.
Some of our existing products and products we have agreements to acquire compete with one or more products marketed by very large pharmaceutical companies that have much greater financial resources for marketing, selling and developing their products. These competitors, as well as others, have been in business for a longer period of time, have a greater number of products on the market and have greater financial and other resources than we do. If we directly compete with them for the same markets and/or products, their financial and market strength could prevent us from capturing a meaningful share of those markets.
We also compete with other OTC pharmaceutical companies for product line acquisitions as well as for new products and acquisitions of other companies.
Research and Development
We have used outside contract research organizations to carry out our research and development activities. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we incurred research and development costs totaling $143,914 and $92,923, respectively. This increase was a result of testing, non-human primate safety studies, clinical studies and material purchases for our products Zestra®, Zestra Glide ®, EjectDelay® and Sensum+™.
Employees
We currently have three full-time employees, Dr. Bassam Damaj, who serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Lynnette Dillen, who serves as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and our Controller. We also rely on a number of consultants. Our employees are not represented by a labor union or by a collective bargaining agreement. Subject to the availability of financing, we intend to expand our staff to implement our growth strategy.
Our business endeavors and our common stock involve a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below with all of the other information included in this report. If any of the following risks actually occur, they may materially harm our business and our financial condition and results of operations. In that event, the market price of our common stock could decline, and investors could lose part or all of their investment.
Risks Related to our Business
We will need additional funding or we will be forced to curtail or cease operations. Our current cash, plus the amount available to us under the funding commitment from our President and Chief Executive Officer and from our product sales and license revenue, is anticipated to sustain operations only through March 31, 2016.
As of December 31, 2014, we had total cash of $7,479, approximately $1.1 million in cash available for use under the LOC Convertible Debenture, and $191,601 in accounts receivable. In January 2015, we entered into two securities purchase agreements with an unrelated third party accredited investor as well as with our Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to which we issued original issue discount 10.0% debentures in the aggregate principal amount of $165,000 (issued at an original issue discount of 10.0%) and warrants to purchase 750,000 shares of our common stock.
In March of 2015, we extended the maturity dated of the 10% Debenture that was due March 13, 2015, until September 13, 2015.
Under the terms of the amended and restated 8% convertible debenture we entered into with our President and Chief Executive Officer, Bassam Damaj, Ph.D., we can currently borrow up to approximately $1,100,000. Dr. Damaj is required to provide us with funds under such debenture if we have insufficient liquidity to meet any material payment obligations arising in the ordinary course of business as they come due, up to the maximum of $1,500,000 in funding (subject to increase in certain circumstances). However, Dr. Damaj’s funding commitment terminates on the earlier to occur of (i) the consummation of one or more transactions pursuant to which we raise net proceeds of at least $4,000,000 and (ii) July 1, 2016. As of December 31, 2014 we borrowed $424,078 under this facility and there was approximately $1.1 million available for draw. Dr. Damaj has agreed not to require the Company to repay the borrowing under the LOC or his accrued salary prior to April 2016.
We have paid numerous consultants and vendor fees through the issuance of equity instruments in order to conserve our cash, however there can be no assurance that we, our vendors, consultants, or employees will continue to agree to this arrangement.
The funding commitment from Dr. Damaj, along with the additional financing we received in January 2015, and from product sales and license revenue, is anticipated to sustain our operations only through March 31, 2016. We currently have no other funding commitments. If Dr. Damaj were not to perform on his funding commitment, we may not have the financial resources available to pursue remedies against him, and if we do pursue remedies against him, such actions could significantly impair our relationship with Dr. Damaj, potentially leading to the loss of his services.
We therefore will need additional funding, either through Dr. Damaj’s commitment, or other sources of equity or debt financings or partnering arrangements. To the extent we raise additional capital through the sale of equity securities, the issuance of those securities could result in dilution to our shareholders. In addition, if we obtain debt financing, a substantial portion of our operating cash flow may be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on such indebtedness, thus limiting funds available for our business activities. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate our research and development programs, reduce our commercialization efforts or curtail our operations. In addition, we may be required to obtain funds through arrangements with collaborative partners or others that may require us to relinquish rights to technologies or products that we would otherwise seek to develop or commercialize ourselves or license rights to technologies or products on terms that are less favorable to us than might otherwise be available.
There is no assurance that we will be successful in raising the additional funds needed to fund our business plan. If we are not able to raise sufficient capital in the near future, our continued operations will be in jeopardy and we may be forced to cease operations and sell or otherwise transfer all or substantially all of our remaining assets.
We have never been profitable and have incurred an accumulated deficit of approximately $11,231,967 as of December 31, 2014. Our ability to generate further revenue and become profitable will depend, among other things, on (1) growing the current sales of our products including Zestra®, Zestra Glide®, EjectDelay® Sensum+®, Vesele®, Fluticare™, and Androferti® (2) the successful acquisition of additional commercial products (3) raising capital to implement our growth strategy, (4) obtaining any applicable regulatory approvals of our proposed product candidates, (5) the successful licensing and commercialization of our proposed product candidates, and (6) growth and development of our operations. If we are unable to accomplish these objectives, we may be unable to generate substantial revenue or achieve profitability.
.
We have a short operating history and have not produced significant revenues over a period of time. This makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and increases the risk that we will not be successful.
We have a short operating history with our current business model, which involves the commercialization, licensing, and development of OTC healthcare products. While we have been in existence for years, we only began our current business model in 2013 and have only generated approximately $1.0 million in revenue in 2014, and our operations have not yet been profitable. No assurances can be given that we will generate any significant revenue in the future. As a result, we have a very limited operating history for you to evaluate in assessing our future prospects. Our operations have not produced significant revenues over a period of time, and may not produce significant revenues in the near term, which may harm our ability to obtain additional financing and may require us to reduce or discontinue our operations. You must consider our business and prospects in light of the risks and difficulties we will encounter as an early-stage company. We may not be able to successfully address these risks and difficulties, which could significantly harm our business, operating results, and financial condition.
We have a history of losses which may continue and which may negatively impact our ability to achieve our business objectives.
We incurred net losses of $4,826,967 and $3,956,179 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In addition, at December 31, 2014, we had an accumulated deficit of $11,231,967. We cannot assure you that we can achieve or sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future. Our operations are subject to the risks and competition inherent in the establishment of a business enterprise. There can be no assurance that future operations will be profitable. Revenues and profits, if any, will depend upon various factors, including (1) growing the current sales of our products, (2) the successful acquisition of additional commercial products, (3) raising capital to implement our growth strategy, (4) obtaining any applicable regulatory approvals of our proposed product candidates, (5) the successful licensing and commercialization of our proposed product candidates, and (6) growth and development of our operations. We may not achieve our business objectives and the failure to achieve such goals would have an adverse impact on us.
The success of our business currently depends on the successful continuous commercialization of our five main products and these products may not be successfully grown beyond their current levels.
We currently have a limited number of products for sale. The success of our business currently depends on our ability, directly or through a commercial partner, to successfully market and sell those limited products outside the U.S. and to expand our retail and online channels in the U.S.
Although we have commercial products that we can currently market and sell, we will continue to seek to acquire or license other products, and we may not be successful in doing so.
We currently have a limited number of products. We may not be successful in marketing and commercializing these products to the extent necessary to sustain our operations. In addition, we will continue to seek to acquire or license non-prescription pharmaceutical and consumer health products. The successful consummation of these type of acquisitions and licensing arrangements is subject to the negotiation of complex agreements and contractual relationships, and we may be unable to negotiate such agreements or relationships on a timely basis, if at all, or on terms acceptable to us.
If we fail to successfully introduce new products, we may lose market position.
New products, product improvements, line extensions or new packaging will be an important factor in our sales growth. If we fail to identify emerging consumer trends, to maintain and improve the competitiveness of our existing products or to successfully introduce new products on a timely basis, we may lose market position. Continued product development and marketing efforts have all the risks inherent in the development of new products and line extensions, including development delays, the failure of new products and line extensions to achieve anticipated levels of market acceptance and the cost of failed product introductions.
Our sales and marketing function is currently very limited and we currently rely on third parties to help us promote our products to physicians in the U.S. and rely on our partners outside the U.S. We will need to maintain the commercial partners we currently have and attract others or be in a position to afford qualified or experienced marketing and sales personnel for our products.
We have had only $1 million in sales of our products to date. We will need to continue to develop strategies, partners, and distribution channels to promote and sell our products.
We have no commercial manufacturing capacity and rely on third-party contract manufacturers to produce commercial quantities of our products.
We do not have the facilities, equipment or personnel to manufacture commercial quantities of our products and therefore must rely on qualified third-party contract manufactures with appropriate facilities and equipment to contract manufacture commercial quantities of products. These third-party contract manufacturers are also subject to current good manufacturing practice, or cGMP regulations, which impose extensive procedural and documentation requirements. Any performance failure on the part of our contract manufacturers could delay commercialization of any approved products, depriving us of potential product revenue.
Failure by our contract manufacturers to achieve and maintain high manufacturing standards could result in patient injury or death, product recalls or withdrawals, delays or failures in testing or delivery, cost overruns, or other problems that could materially adversely affect our business. Contract manufacturers may encounter difficulties involving production yields, quality control, and quality assurance. These manufacturers are subject to ongoing periodic unannounced inspection by the FDA and corresponding state and foreign agencies to ensure strict compliance with cGMP and other applicable government regulations; however, beyond contractual remedies that may be available to us, we do not have control over third-party manufacturers’ compliance with these regulations and standards.
If for some reason our contract manufacturers cannot perform as agreed, we may be required to replace them. Although we believe there are a number of potential replacements, we may incur added costs and delays in identifying and qualifying any such replacements.
The inability of a manufacturer to ship orders of our products in a timely manner or to meet quality standards could cause us to miss the delivery date requirements of our customers for those items, which could result in cancellation of orders, refusal to accept deliveries or a reduction in purchase prices, any of which could have a material adverse effect as our revenues would decrease and we would incur net losses as a result of sales of the product, if any sales could be made.
We are also dependent on certain third parties for the supply of the raw materials necessary to develop and manufacture our products, including the active and inactive pharmaceutical ingredients used in our products. We are required to identify the supplier of all the raw materials for our products in any drug applications that we file with the FDA, and all FDA-approved products that we acquire from others. If raw materials for a particular product become unavailable from an approved supplier specified in a drug application, we would be required to qualify a substitute supplier with the FDA, which would likely delay or interrupt manufacturing of the affected product. To the extent practicable, we attempt to identify more than one supplier in each drug application. However, some raw materials are available only from a single source and, in some of our drug applications, only one supplier of raw materials has been identified, even in instances where multiple sources exist.
In addition, we obtain some of our raw materials and products from foreign suppliers. Arrangements with international raw material suppliers are subject to, among other things, FDA regulation; various import duties, foreign currency risk and other government clearances. Acts of governments outside the U.S. may affect the price or availability of raw materials needed for the development or manufacture of our products. In addition, any changes in patent laws in jurisdictions outside the U.S. may make it increasingly difficult to obtain raw materials for research and development prior to the expiration of the applicable U.S. or foreign patents.
The business that we conduct outside the United States may be adversely affected by international risk and uncertainties.
Although our operations are based in the United States, we conduct business outside the United States and expect to continue to do so in the future.
In addition, we plan to seek approvals to sell our products in foreign countries. Any business that we conduct outside the United States will be subject to additional risks that may materially adversely affect our ability to conduct business in international markets, including:
-
potentially reduced protection for intellectual property rights;
-
unexpected changes in tariffs, trade barriers and regulatory requirements;
-
economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in particular foreign economies and markets;
-
workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the United States;
-
production shortages resulting from any events affecting a product candidate and/or finished drug product supply or manufacturing capabilities abroad;
-
business interruptions resulting from geo-political actions, including war and terrorism, or natural disasters, including earthquakes, hurricanes, typhoons, floods and fires; and
-
failure to comply with Office of Foreign Asset Control rules and regulations and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA.
These factors or any combination of these factors may adversely affect our revenue or our overall financial performance.
Acquisitions involve risks that could result in a reduction of our operating results, cash flows and liquidity.
We have made, and in the future may continue to make strategic acquisitions. However, we may not be able to identify suitable acquisition opportunities. We may pay for acquisitions with our common stock or with convertible securities, which may dilute your investment in our common stock, or we may decide to pursue acquisitions that investors may not agree with. In connection with our latest acquisition, we have also agreed to substantial earn-out arrangements. To the extent we defer the payment of the purchase price for any acquisition through a cash earn-out arrangement, it will reduce our cash flows in subsequent periods. In addition, acquisitions may expose us to operational challenges and risks, including:
|
·
|
the ability to profitably manage acquired businesses or successfully integrate the acquired business’ operations and financial reporting and accounting control systems into our business;
|
|
·
|
increased indebtedness and contingent purchase price obligations associated with an acquisition;
|
|
·
|
the ability to fund cash flow shortages that may occur if anticipated revenue is not realized or is delayed, whether by general economic or market conditions, or unforeseen internal difficulties;
|
|
·
|
the availability of funding sufficient to meet increased capital needs;
|
|
·
|
diversion of management’s attention; and
|
|
·
|
the ability to retain or hire qualified personnel required for expanded operations.
|
Completing acquisitions may require significant management time and financial resources. In addition, acquired companies may have liabilities that we failed, or were unable, to discover in the course of performing due diligence investigations. We cannot assure you that the indemnification granted to us by sellers of acquired companies will be sufficient in amount, scope or duration to fully offset the possible liabilities associated with businesses or properties we assume upon consummation of an acquisition. We may learn additional information about our acquired businesses that materially adversely affect us, such as unknown or contingent liabilities and liabilities related to compliance with applicable laws. Any such liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Failure to successfully manage the operational challenges and risks associated with, or resulting from, acquisitions could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and liquidity. Borrowings or issuances of convertible securities associated with these acquisitions may also result in higher levels of indebtedness which could impact our ability to service our debt within the scheduled repayment terms.
We will need to expand our operations and increase the size of our Company, and we may experience difficulties in managing growth.
As we increase the number of products we own or have the right to sell, we will need to increase our sales, marketing, product development, scientific and administrative headcount to manage these programs. In addition, to meet our obligations as a public company, we will need to increase our general and administrative capabilities. Our management, personnel and systems currently in place may not be adequate to support this future growth. Our need to effectively manage our operations, growth and various projects requires that we:
|
•
|
successfully attract and recruit new employees with the expertise and experience we will require;
|
|
•
|
Successfully grow our marketing, distribution and sales infrastructure; and
|
|
•
|
continue to improve our operational, manufacturing, financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures.
|
If we are unable to successfully manage this growth and increased complexity of operations, our business may be adversely affected.
If we fail to attract and keep senior management and key scientific personnel, we may be unable to successfully operate our business.
Our success depends to a significant extent upon the continued services of Dr. Bassam Damaj, our President and Chief Executive Officer. Dr. Damaj has overseen our current business strategy since inception and provides leadership for our growth and operations strategy as well as being our sole employee with any significant scientific or pharmaceutical experience. Loss of the services of Dr. Damaj would have a material adverse effect on our growth, revenues, and prospective business. The loss of any of our key personnel, or the inability to attract and retain qualified personnel, may significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our research, development or business objectives and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Any employment agreement we enter into will not ensure the retention of the employee who is a party to the agreement. In addition, we have only limited ability to prevent former employees from competing with us. Furthermore, our future success will also depend in part on the continued service of our key scientific and management personnel and our ability to identify, hire, and retain additional personnel. We experience intense competition for qualified personnel and may be unable to attract and retain the personnel necessary for the development of our business. Moreover, competition for personnel with the scientific and technical skills that we seek is extremely high and is likely to remain high. Because of this competition, our compensation costs may increase significantly. We presently have no scientific employees.
We face significant competition and have limited resources compared to our competitors.
We are engaged in a highly competitive industry. We can expect competition from numerous companies, including large international enterprises, and others entering the market for products similar to ours. Most of these companies have greater research and development, manufacturing, patent, legal, marketing, financial, technological, personnel and managerial resources. Acquisitions of competing companies by large pharmaceutical or healthcare companies could further enhance such competitors’ financial, marketing and other resources. Competitors may complete clinical trials, obtain regulatory approvals and commence commercial sales of their products before we could enjoy a significant competitive advantage. Products developed by our competitors may be more effective than our product candidates.
Competition and technological change may make our product candidates and technologies less attractive or obsolete.
We compete with established pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that are pursuing other products for the same markets we are pursuing and that have greater financial and other resources. Other companies may succeed in developing or acquiring products earlier than us, developing products that are more effective than our products or achieve greater market acceptance. As these companies develop their products, they may develop competitive positions that may prevent, make futile, or limit our product commercialization efforts, which would result in a decrease in the revenue we would be able to derive from the sale of any products.
If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights, our ability to pursue the development of our technologies and products would be negatively affected.
Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain patents and maintain adequate protection of our technologies and products. If we do not adequately protect our intellectual property, competitors may be able to use our technologies to produce and market products in direct competition with us and erode our competitive advantage. Some foreign countries lack rules and methods for defending intellectual property rights and do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the United States. Many companies have had difficulty protecting their proprietary rights in these foreign countries. We may not be able to prevent misappropriation of our proprietary rights.
We have received, and are currently seeking, patent protection for numerous compounds and methods of use. However, the patent process is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in protecting our products by obtaining and defending patents. These risks and uncertainties include the following: patents that may be issued or licensed may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented, or otherwise may not provide any competitive advantage; our competitors, many of which have substantially greater resources than us and many of which have made significant investments in competing technologies, may seek, or may already have obtained, patents that will limit, interfere with, or eliminate our ability to make, use, and sell our potential products either in the United States or in international markets; countries other than the United States may have less restrictive patent laws than those upheld by United States courts, allowing foreign competitors the ability to exploit these laws to create, develop, and market competing products.
Moreover, any patents issued to us may not provide us with meaningful protection, or others may challenge, circumvent or narrow our patents. Third parties may also independently develop products similar to our products, duplicate our unpatented products or design around any patents on products we develop. Additionally, extensive time is required for development, testing and regulatory review of a potential product. While extensions of patent term due to regulatory delays may be available, it is possible that, before any of our products candidates can be commercialized, any related patent, even with an extension, may expire or remain in force for only a short period following commercialization, thereby reducing any advantages of the patent.
In addition, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the "PTO") and patent offices in other jurisdictions have often required that patent applications concerning pharmaceutical and/or biotechnology-related inventions be limited or narrowed substantially to cover only the specific innovations exemplified in the patent application, thereby limiting the scope of protection against competitive challenges. Thus, even if we or our licensors are able to obtain patents, the patents may be substantially narrower than anticipated.
Our success depends on our patents, patent applications that may be licensed exclusively to us and other patents to which we may obtain assignment or licenses. We may not be aware, however, of all patents, published applications or published literature that may affect our business either by blocking our ability to commercialize our products, by preventing the patentability of our products to us or our licensors, or by covering the same or similar technologies that may invalidate our patents, limit the scope of our future patent claims or adversely affect our ability to market our products.
In addition to patents, we rely on a combination of trade secrets, confidentiality, nondisclosure and other contractual provisions, and security measures to protect our confidential and proprietary information. These measures may not adequately protect our trade secrets or other proprietary information. If they do not adequately protect our rights, third parties could use our technology, and we could lose any competitive advantage we may have. In addition, others may independently develop similar proprietary information or techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets, which could impair any competitive advantage we may have.
Patent protection and other intellectual property protection is crucial to the success of our business and prospects, and there is a substantial risk that such protections will prove inadequate.
We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents, which could be expensive and time consuming.
The pharmaceutical industry has been characterized by extensive litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights, and companies have employed intellectual property litigation to gain a competitive advantage. We may become subject to infringement claims or litigation arising out of patents and pending applications of our competitors, or additional interference proceedings declared by the PTO to determine the priority of inventions. The defense and prosecution of intellectual property suits, PTO proceedings, and related legal and administrative proceedings are costly and time-consuming to pursue, and their outcome is uncertain. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our issued patents, to protect our trade secrets and know-how, or to determine the enforceability, scope, and validity of the proprietary rights of others. An adverse determination in litigation or interference proceedings to which we may become a party could subject us to significant liabilities, require us to obtain licenses from third parties, or restrict or prevent us from selling our products in certain markets. Although patent and intellectual property disputes might be settled through licensing or similar arrangements, the costs associated with such arrangements may be substantial and could include our paying large fixed payments and ongoing royalties. Furthermore, the necessary licenses may not be available on satisfactory terms or at all.
Competitors may infringe our patents, and we may file infringement claims to counter infringement or unauthorized use. This can be expensive, particularly for a company of our size, and time-consuming. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours is not valid or is unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover its technology. An adverse determination of any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly.
Also, a third party may assert that our patents are invalid and/or unenforceable. There are no unresolved communications, allegations, complaints or threats of litigation related to the possibility that our patents are invalid or unenforceable. Any litigation or claims against us, whether or not merited, may result in substantial costs, place a significant strain on our financial resources, divert the attention of management and harm our reputation. An adverse decision in litigation could result in inadequate protection for our product candidates and/or reduce the value of any license agreements we have with third parties.
Interference proceedings brought before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office may be necessary to determine priority of invention with respect to our patents or patent applications. During an interference proceeding, it may be determined that we do not have priority of invention for one or more aspects in our patents or patent applications and could result in the invalidation in part or whole of a patent or could put a patent application at risk of not issuing. Even if successful, an interference proceeding may result in substantial costs and distraction to our management.
Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation or interference proceedings, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If investors perceive these results to be negative, the price of our common stock could be adversely affected.
If we infringe the rights of third parties we could be prevented from selling products, forced to pay damages, and defend against litigation.
If our products, methods, processes and other technologies infringe the proprietary rights of other parties, we could incur substantial costs and we may have to: obtain licenses, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all; abandon an infringing product candidate; redesign our products or processes to avoid infringement; stop using the subject matter claimed in the patents held by others; pay damages; and/or defend litigation or administrative proceedings which may be costly whether we win or lose, and which could result in a substantial diversion of our financial and management resources.
We may be subject to potential product liability and other claims, creating risks and expense.
We are also exposed to potential product liability risks inherent in the development, testing, manufacturing, marketing and sale of human therapeutic products. Product liability insurance for the pharmaceutical industry is extremely expensive, difficult to obtain and may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. We have no guarantee that the coverage limits of such insurance policies will be adequate. A successful claim against us which is in excess of our insurance coverage, could have a material adverse effect upon us and on our financial condition.
Changes in trends in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, including difficult market conditions, could adversely affect our operating results.
The biotechnology, pharmaceutical and medical device industries generally, and drug discovery and development companies more specifically, are subject to increasingly rapid technological changes. Our competitors and others might develop technologies or products that are more effective or commercially attractive than our current or future technologies or products, or that render our technologies or products less competitive or obsolete. If competitors introduce superior technologies or products and we cannot make enhancements to our technologies or products to remain competitive, our competitive position, and in turn our business, revenue and financial condition, would be materially and adversely affected.
We may never receive ANDA approval for our product Fluticare®, which we are relying upon to generate a significant amount of future revenue.
Because of the unpredictability of the FDA review process for generic drugs, the ANDA filed for our product Fluticare® may never be approved by the FDA for a variety of reasons. If such ANDA is not approved, we will not be able to realize revenues from the sale of this drug and our revenues will not grow as quickly as we anticipate.
Risks Related to Owning our Common Stock
Sales of additional shares of our common stock could cause the price of our common stock to decline.
As detailed elsewhere in this annual report, since June 2014, we have issued approximately 17,128,620 shares, or 42.2% of our shares outstanding as of March 24, 2015 of which approximately 13 million were issued in conjunction with our acquisition of Novalere. While substantially all of those shares were restricted securities, such shares may be sold under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, subject to any applicable holding period. As such, sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public or private markets, or the availability of such shares for sale by us, including the issuance of common stock upon conversion and/or exercise of outstanding convertible securities, warrants and options, could adversely affect the price of our common stock. We may sell shares or securities convertible into shares of common stock, which could adversely affect the market price of shares of our common stock. In addition, the sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, or anticipation of such sales, could make it more difficult for us to obtain future financing. To the extent the trading price of our common stock at the time of exercise of any of our outstanding options or warrants exceeds their exercise price, such exercise will have a dilutive effect on our stockholders.
The market price for our common stock may be volatile, and your investment in our common stock could decline in value.
The stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. The market prices of the securities of biotechnology and specialty pharmaceutical companies, particularly companies like ours with limited product revenues, have been highly volatile and may continue to be highly volatile in the future. This volatility has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. The following factors, in addition to other risk factors described in this section, may have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock:
|
•
|
announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors;
|
|
•
|
announcement of FDA approval or disapproval of our product candidates or other product-related actions;
|
|
•
|
developments involving our discovery efforts and clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
developments or disputes concerning patents or proprietary rights, including announcements of infringement, interference or other litigation against us or our potential licensees;
|
|
•
|
developments involving our efforts to commercialize our products, including developments impacting the timing of commercialization;
|
|
•
|
announcements concerning our competitors, or the biotechnology, pharmaceutical or drug delivery industry in general;
|
|
•
|
public concerns as to the safety or efficacy of our products or our competitors’ products;
|
|
•
|
changes in government regulation of the pharmaceutical or medical industry;
|
|
•
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;
|
|
•
|
changes in financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;
|
|
•
|
developments involving corporate collaborators, if any;
|
|
•
|
changes in accounting principles; and
|
|
•
|
the loss of any of our key management personnel.
|
In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against companies that experience volatility in the market price of their securities. Whether or not meritorious, litigation brought against us could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock and, accordingly, shareholders must rely on stock appreciation for any return on their investment.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. The declaration of dividends is subject to the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on various factors, including our operating results, financial condition, future prospects and any other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. You should not rely on an investment in our company if you require dividend income from your investment in our company. The success of your investment will likely depend entirely upon any future appreciation of the market price of our common stock, which is uncertain and unpredictable. There is no guarantee that our common stock will appreciate in value.
Nevada law and provisions in our charter documents may delay or prevent a potential takeover bid that would be beneficial to common stockholders.
Our articles of incorporation and our bylaws contain provisions that may enable our board of directors to discourage, delay, or prevent a change in our ownership or in our management. In addition, these provisions could limit the price that investors would be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. These provisions include the following:
|
·
|
our board of directors may increase the size of the board of directors up to nine directors and fill vacancies on the board of directors; and
|
|
·
|
our board of directors is expressly authorized to make, alter, or repeal our bylaws.
|
In addition, Chapter 78 of the Nevada Revised Statutes contains provisions that may enable our board of directors to discourage, delay, or prevent a change in our ownership or in our management. The combinations with interested stockholders provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes, subject to certain exceptions, restrict the ability of our Company to engage in any combination with an interested stockholder for three years after the date a stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, unless, prior to the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, our board of directors gave approval for the combination or the acquisition of shares which caused the stockholder to become an interested stockholder. If the combination or acquisition was not so approved prior to the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder may effect a combination after the three-year period only if either the stockholder receives approval from a majority of the outstanding voting shares, excluding shares beneficially owned by the interested stockholder or its affiliates or associates, or the consideration to be paid by the interested stockholder exceeds certain thresholds set forth in the statute. For purposes of the foregoing provisions, "interested stockholder" means either a person, other than our Company or our subsidiaries, who directly or indirectly beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding voting shares, or one of our affiliates or associates which at any time within three years immediately before the date in question directly or indirectly beneficially owned 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding shares.
In addition, the acquisition of controlling interest provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes provide that a stockholder acquiring a controlling interest in our Company, and those acting in association with that stockholder, obtain no voting rights in the control shares unless voting rights are conferred by stockholders holding a majority of our voting power (exclusive of the control shares). For purposes of these provisions, "controlling interest" means the ownership of outstanding voting shares enabling the acquiring person to exercise (either directly or indirectly or in association with others) one-fifth or more but less than one-third, one-third or more but less than a majority, or a majority or more of the voting power in the election of our directors, and "control shares" means those shares the stockholder acquired on the date it obtained a controlling interest or in the 90-day period preceding that date.
Accordingly, the provisions could require multiple votes with respect to voting rights in share acquisitions effected in separate stages, and the effect of these provisions may be to discourage, delay, or prevent a change in control of our Company.
The rights of the holders of common stock may be impaired by the potential issuance of preferred stock.
Our articles of incorporation give our board of directors the right to create new series of preferred stock. As a result, the board of directors may, without stockholder approval, issue preferred stock with voting, dividend, conversion, liquidation or other rights which could adversely affect the voting power and equity interest of the holders of common stock. Preferred stock, which could be issued with the right to more than one vote per share, could be utilized as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change of control. The possible impact on takeover attempts could adversely affect the price of our common stock. Although we have no present intention to issue any shares of preferred stock or to create a series of preferred stock, we may issue such shares in the future.
Because certain of our stockholders control a significant number of shares of our common stock, they may have effective control over actions requiring stockholder approval.
As of March 24, 2015, our directors, executive officers and principal stockholders (those beneficially owning in excess of 5%), and their respective affiliates, beneficially own approximately 55.3% of our outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, would have the ability to control the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, these stockholders, acting together, would have the ability to control the management and affairs of our company. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership might harm the market price of our common stock by:
|
•
|
delaying, deferring or preventing a change in corporate control;
|
|
•
|
impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving us; or
|
|
•
|
discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.
|
Our common stock is subject to the "penny stock" rules of the SEC and the trading market in our securities is limited, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our stock.
The SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require:
·
|
that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks; and
|
·
|
the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.
|
In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:
·
|
obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and
|
·
|
make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.
|
The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:
·
|
sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and
|
·
|
that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.
|
Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the "penny stock" rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.
Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.
FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a shareholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.
In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
|
There are no unresolved staff comments at December 31, 2014.
We maintain our principal office at 9171 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 440, San Diego, California 92122. Our telephone number at that office is (858) 964-5123. Our lease agreement was entered into on January 15, 2014 and expires on January 15, 2016. Our monthly rental rate under the agreement is approximately $7,270 per month.
We believe that our existing facilities are suitable and adequate to meet our current business requirements, but we will require a larger, more permanent space as we add personnel consistent with our business plan. We anticipate we will be able to acquire additional facilities as needed on terms consistent with our current lease. We maintain a website at www.innovuspharma.com and the information contained on that website is not deemed to be a part of this annual report.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
|
Not applicable.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities.
Market Information
Our common stock is available for quotationon the OTCQB underthe trading symbol “INNV.” The market for our common stock is limited. The prices at which our common stock may trade may be volatile and subject to broad price movements.
The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices per share of our common stock for the periods indicated as reported on the OTCQB. The quotes represent inter-dealer prices, without adjustment for retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions. The trading volume of our securities fluctuates and may be limited during certain periods. As a result of these volume fluctuations, the liquidity of an investment in our securities may be adversely affected.
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
As of March 24, 2015, we had 539 record holders of our common stock. The number of record holders does not include holders who hold their stock in “street name” inside bank or brokerage accounts.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We expect to retain all available funds and any future earnings to support operations and fund the development and growth of our business. Our board of directors will determine whether we pay and the amount of future dividends (including cash dividends), if any.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2014, we did not sell any unregistered securities that have not been previously reported as sales of unregistered securities on Form 8-K.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
|
Under SEC rules and regulations, because of the aggregate worldwide market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, we are considered to be a “smaller reporting company.” Accordingly, we are not required to provide the information required by this item in this report.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|
The following information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.
Overview
We are an emerging pharmaceutical company engaged in the commercialization, licensing, and development of safe and effective non-prescription medicine and consumer care products to improve men’s and women’s health and vitality and respiratory diseases. We deliver innovative and uniquely presented and packaged health solutions through our over-the-counter, (“OTC”) medicines and consumer and health products, which we market directly or through commercial partners to primary care physicians, urologists, gynecologists and therapists, and directly to consumers through on-line channels, retailers and wholesalers. Our business model leverages our ability to acquire and in-license commercial products that are supported by scientific, and or clinical evidence, place them through our existing supply chain, retail and on-line channels to tap new markets and drive demand for such products and to establish physician relationships. We currently market five products in the United States and in 28 countries around the world through our commercial partners.
We have five products that are currently being marketed: (1) Zestra® , a non-medicated, patented consumer care product that has been clinically proven to increase desire, arousal, and satisfaction in women; (2) EjectDelay®, an OTC monograph-compliant benzocaine-based topical gel for treating premature ejaculation; (3) Sensum+®, a non-medicated consumer care cream that increases penile sensitivity (ex-U.S.); (4) Zestra Glide® , a clinically-tested high viscosity low osmolality water-based lubricant; and (5) Vesele ®, a proprietary and novel oral dietary supplement to maximize nitric oxide beneficial clinical effects on sexual functions and brain health. Vesele ® contains a patented formulation of L-Arginine and L-Citrulline in combination with the natural absorption enhancer Bioperine®. While we generate revenue from the sale of our five products, most revenue is currently generated by Zestra®, Zestra® Glide, EjectDelay® and Sensum +®.
Our Strategy
Our corporate strategy focuses on two primary objectives:
|
1.
|
Developing a diversified product portfolio of exclusive, unique and patented non-prescription pharmaceutical and consumer health products through: (a) the acquisition of products or obtaining exclusive rights to market such products; and (b) the introduction of line extensions and reformulations of currently marketed products; and
|
|
2.
|
Building an innovative, global sales and marketing model through commercial partnerships with established complimentary partners that: (a) generates revenue; and (b) requires a lower cost structure compared to traditional pharmaceutical companies.
|
We believe that our proven ability to market, license, acquire and develop brand name non-prescription pharmaceutical and consumer health products uniquely positions us to commercialize our products and grow in this market in a differentiated way.
|
Business Combinations
The following transactions are critical to understanding our business and financial statements.
Acquisition of Semprae
On December 24, 2013, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of Semprae in exchange for the issuance of 3,201,776 shares of our common stock issued to the former Semprae stockholders. In the transaction, we also agreed to pay the former Semprae stockholders an annual royalty equal to five percent of the net sales from Zestra®, and Zestra® Glide and any second generation products derived primarily therefrom up until the time that a generic version of such product is introduced worldwide by a third party. As a result of the acquisition, we acquired all of Semprae’s assets and liabilities, including the Zestra products.
Acquisition of Novalere
On February 4, 2015 we entered into an agreement to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Novalere from the Novalere Stockholders and subsequently closed the transaction on February 5, 2015. As a result of the transaction, we issued the Consideration Shares to the Novalere Stockholders (except those who received cash), of which the Closing Consideration Shares (12,947,657 shares of common stock) were issued to the Novalere Stockholders and the remaining ANDA Consideration Shares will be delivered only if the ANDA Approval is obtained. In addition, the Novalere Stockholders are entitled to receive, if and when earned, the Earn-Out Payments. For every $5 million in Net Revenue by the Target Product, the Novalere Stockholders will be entitled to receive, on a pro rata basis, $500,000, subject to cumulative maximum Earn-Out Payments of $2.5 million.
As a result of the transaction, we acquired the worldwide rights to the Fluticare™ brand (Fluticasone propionate nasal spray) from Novalere. Innovus expects that the ANDA filed in November 2014 with the FDA may be approved by the end of 2015 or in the first half of 2016. Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray is the #1 most prescribed nasal steroid in the U.S. since 2007, with more than 150 million units sold and has been sold and is the #1 prescribed nasal spray to patients in the U.S. for more than five consecutive years. More than 40 million units of FlutiCare™ nasal spray product form have been sold in the U.S. in 2014, and the worldwide market is estimated to be over $1 billion annually.
Results of Operations
Fiscal year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Fiscal year Ended December 31, 2013
Revenues
We recognized revenues of $1,030,113 for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $6,641 for the year ended December 31, 2013. Revenue was generated from the acquisition of and subsequent launch of our commercial products in the U.S., as well as the launch of our products with four of our international commercial partners. We recognized $375,000 in upfront fees related to the licensing agreements with Ovation Pharma, Orimed Pharma, and Sothema, and $655,113 in product sales for Zestra®, Zestra Glide®, EjectDelay®, Sensum +®,and Vesele®.
Cost of Goods Sold
We recognized cost of goods sold of $292,080 for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $1,821 for the year ended December 31, 2013. The cost of goods sold includes the cost of inventory, shipping and royalties.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses increased to $143,914 for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $92,923 for the year ended December 31, 2013. This increase was a result of conducting testing, clinical trials, material purchases related to product testing, and regulatory costs for our products Zestra®, EjectDelay® and Sensum+™.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses increased by $577,919 to $4,378,749 for the year ended December 31, 2014, from $3,800,830 for the year ended December 31, 2013. This was primarily due to increases in expense of $290,000 related to common stock, stock units and stock options issued for services, and an increase of $295,000 in payroll and related expenses for employees that were hired during the year. Additionally, our general and administrative expenses include professional fees, investor relations, insurance premiums, public reporting costs and general corporate expenses. We expect our general and administrative expenses to increase most notably in the area of compensation as we build our business and increase our sales and commercialization efforts of our products.
Other Income and Expense
We recognized interest expense of $532,230 and $67,246 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which includes non-cash interest expense of $443,867 related to debt discounts and debt conversions in 2014 and $8,017 in 2013. This increase was primarily due to amortization of debt discount related to the February 2014 Convertible Debenture and the LOC convertible debenture as well as the conversion of the convertible debt which occurred in February 2014. We recognized a loss from extinguishment of debt of $406,833 related to the re purchase and subsequent cancellation of the Lourmarin note. Also included in other expenses is a fair value adjustment of approximately $103,000 for the Contingent Consideration related to the re-measurement of the royalty due to the former shareholders from the Semprae acquisition.
Net Loss
As a result of the foregoing, we recognized net losses of $4,826,967 and $3,956,179 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historically, we have funded losses from operations through the sale of equity and issuance of debt instruments, primarily to related parties including directors and officers. Combined with minimal revenue, these funds have provided us with the resources to operate our business, to sell and support our products, attract and retain key personnel, and add new products to our portfolio. To date, we have experienced net losses and negative cash flows from operations each year since our inception. Through December 31, 2014, we had an accumulated deficit of $11,231,967.
As of December 31, 2014, we had $7,479 in cash and cash equivalents, $1.1 million in cash available for use under the LOC Convertible Debenture and $191,601 in accounts receivable. We have raised funds through the issuance of convertible debentures and sale of common stock. We have also utilized equity instruments where possible to pay for services from vendors and consultants. Furthermore, we have an arrangement with our Chief Executive Officer which provides for a line of credit to us and permits the deferral of salary payments as described below. Based upon these factors and arrangements we believe our cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next 12 months. We expect that our short-term operating expenses will be substantial as we continue to sell and support our products and attract and retain key personnel.
Significant borrowings include the following:
Line of Credit Convertible Debenture
In January 2013, we entered into a line of credit convertible debenture with our Chief Executive Officer and President. (See Notes 5 and 10 to the financial statements). Dr. Damaj is committed to advance funds (up to the maximum amount borrowable thereunder) to us upon our request if and to the extent we will have insufficient liquidity to meet any material payment obligations arising in the ordinary course of business as they come due. Dr. Damaj’s funding commitment automatically terminates on the earlier of July 1, 2016 or when we complete a financing with minimum net proceeds of at least $4,000,000. In addition, Dr. Damaj’s funding commitment increases by the gross amount of any cash salary, bonus or severance payments provided to him under his employment agreement with us. His salary has been accrued and not paid under the provision of his employment agreement stating that salary payments will be accrued and not paid for so long as payment of such salary would jeopardize our ability to continue as a going concern. Dr. Damaj has agreed not to require the Company to repay the borrowings under the LOC convertible debt or accrued salary prior to April 2016.
During 2013, we borrowed $448,475 against the LOC. On February 19, 2014, we agreed with Dr. Bassam Damaj to convert the then current principal and interest owed under the LOC Debenture as of such date into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.40 per share. The principal and interest amount owed under the LOC Debenture immediately prior to conversion was $476,165, which was converted into 1,190,411 shares of our common stock. On July 22, 2014 the principal amount which may be borrowed under the LOC was increased from $1 million to $1.5 million. During 2014, we borrowed $424,078 against the LOC. The LOC Debenture continues to exist outstanding in accordance with its terms, and as of December 31, 2014 we may borrow up to $1.1 million. The securities to be issued upon automatic conversion will be either the Company’s securities that are issued to the investors in a Qualified Financing, or, if the financing does not occur by July 1, 2016, shares of the Company’s common stock based on a conversion price of $0.312 per share (80% times the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the amendment). On July 22, 2014, the principal amount which may be borrowed under the LOC was increased from $1 million to $1.5 million. During 2014, we borrowed $424,078 agains the LOC.
February 2014 Convertible Debenture
On February 13, 2014, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with an unrelated third party accredited investor pursuant to which we issued an original issue discount 10.0% convertible debenture in the aggregate principal amount of $330,000 (issued at an original issue discount of 10.0%) (the “SPA Debenture”) and a warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock (the “SPA Warrant”).
The SPA Debenture is for the principal amount of $330,000, bears interest at the rate of 10% per annum and the principal amount and interest are payable on March 13, 2015 (the “Repayment Date”). The SPA Debenture may be converted in whole or in part at any time prior to the Repayment Date by the holder at a conversion price of $0.40 per share, subject to adjustment. We have the option to redeem the SPA Debenture before its maturity by payment in cash of 125% of the then outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest and other amounts due. The SPA Warrant provides the holder with the right to acquire up to 250,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.50 per share, subject to certain adjustments as described in the SPA Warrant, at any time through the fifth anniversary of its issuance date.
On March 12, 2015 we entered into an agreement to extend the SPA Debenture for six months. The new maturity date of the SPA Debenture is September 13, 2015 and the SPA Debenture was amended so that we may prepay the SPA Debenture at our option. As consideration for the extension, we issued the note holder 250,000 shares of common stock and amended and restated the warrant. The warrant was originally exercisable until February 13, 2019 for 250,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, subject to anti-dilution protection. The warrant, as amended and restated, has been increased to 500,000 shares, and is exercisable until March 12, 2020 at an exercise price of $0.30 per share of common stock. The warrant, as amended and restated, contains certain anti-dilution protection provisions.
September 2014 Convertible Note
On September 29, 2014, we issued a convertible promissory note (the “Note”) to an unrelated third party for $50,000. The Note has a principal face amount of $92,000, does not accrue interest, and is due on March 28, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”). The Note bears the right to convert any part of the principal amount under the Note into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.40 per share (the “Conversion Price”). On the Maturity Date, any outstanding principal due under the Note will be automatically converted into common stock at the Conversion Price. The implicit interest rate is 41%, related to the original issue discount and benficial conversion feature.
January 2015 Promissory Notes
On January 21, 2015, we entered into securities purchase agreements (the “Securities Purchase Agreements”) with an unrelated third party and Lynnette Dillen, our Chief Financial Officer whereby we issued and sold to the investors promissory notes in the aggregate principal face amount of $165,000 and issued warrants to purchase up to 750,000 shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of $150,000. The notes are due on July 31, 2015 and accrued a one-time interest charge of 8%.
Sources and Uses of Cash
At December 31, 2014, we had cash of $7,479 as well as approximately $1.1 million available under the line of credit. For the year ended December 31, 2014, cash used in operating activities was $841,270, consisting primarily of the net loss for the period of $4,826,967,offset by non-cash stock compensation expense of $1,509,005, common stock issued for services of $749,063, $443,867 for non-cash accretion of debt discount to interest expense, and $114,006 for amortization expense of intangible assets, and a charge related to the change in fair value of the contingent consideration of $103,274.
Additionally, working capital changes consisted of cash increases related to a $210,549 increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses, a $511,262 increase in accrued compensation, a $86,353 increase in interest payable, and a $25,040 decrease in accounts receivable offset by cash decreases related to a $88,108 increase in inventory and a decrease in deferred revenue of $150,345.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, cash used in investing activities was $61,534 including the purchase of intangible assets associated with the Sensum+® patent filings. For the year ended December 31, 2014, cash provided by financing activities was $876,910 relating primarily to $300,000 in proceeds from the issuance of the February 2014 Convertible Debenture, $150,000 in proceeds from the issuance of additional non-convertible debt instruments to related parties, as well as $424,078 in proceeds from borrowings under the LOC Convertible Debenture.
We expect that our existing capital resources, including the funds we may borrow under the line of credit convertible debenture entered with our President and Chief Executive Officer, of which approximately $1,100,000 is still available, will be sufficient to allow us to continue our operations and commercialization of our products. However, our actual needs will depend on numerous factors, including timing of introducing our products to the marketplace, our ability to attract ex-US distributors for our products, our ability to in-license or develop new product candidates and our ability to finalize merger and acquisition activities. As a result, our actual capital needs may substantially exceed our anticipated capital needs and we may have to substantially modify or terminate current and planned commercial and development operations, enter into strategic relationships or merge or be acquired by another company. As a result, our business may be materially harmed, our stock price may be adversely affected, and our ability to raise additional capital may be impaired.
We will need to raise substantial additional funds to support our long-term product acquisitions and commercialization programs. We regularly consider various fund raising and strategic alternatives, including, for example, debt or equity financing and merger and acquisition alternatives. We may also seek additional funding through strategic alliances, collaborations, or license agreements and other financing mechanisms. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of our products; obtain funds through arrangements with licensees or others that may require us to relinquish rights to certain of our products that we might otherwise seek to develop or commercialize on our own; significantly restructure operations and implement cost saving initiatives, including but not limited to, reductions in salaries and/or elimination of employees and consultants or cessation of operations; or, merge or be acquired by another company.
Other potential sources of liquidity in the short term include payments from our existing partners for license fees, entering into new collaborative, licensing or commercial agreements in additional territories, and revenues from the sale of our products.
Critical Accounting Policies and Management Estimates
The SEC defines critical accounting policies as those that are, in management’s view, important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and demanding of management’s judgment. Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ significantly from those estimates.
While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements, we believe the following accounting policies are critical in the preparation of our financial statements:
Long-Lived Assets
We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. We evaluate assets for potential impairment by comparing estimated future undiscounted net cash flows to the carrying amount of the asset. If the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated future undiscounted cash flows, impairment is measured based on the difference between the carrying amount of the assets and fair value.
Fair Value Measurement
Our financial instruments are cash, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, contingent liabilities convertible debentures and a convertible debt instrument. The recorded values of cash, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature. The recorded values of convertible debentures and convertible debt, net of the discount, approximate the fair value as the interest rate (stated or effective) approximates market rates for similar instruments.
We follow a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to measurements involving significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
|
·
|
Level 1 measurements are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.
|
|
·
|
Level 2 measurements are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
|
|
·
|
Level 3 measurements are unobservable inputs.
|
Revenue Recognition, Trade Receivables and Deferred Revenue
We generate revenues from product sales and the licensing of the rights to market and commercialize our products.
We recognize revenue in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3) price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.
Product Sales. We ship product to our customers pursuant to purchase agreements or orders. We recognize revenues from product sales generally at shipping point or when delivered as specified in the sales contract.
Net Sales. We have recognized net revenue from product sales that have occurred through CRI’s website. Net revenue is recognized net of cost of the product, warehousing, shipping and royalty costs. Certain product sales have been recorded as deferred revenue where the product is currently not available.
License Arrangements. Payments received by us under license arrangements to market and commercialize its products may include non-refundable upfront fees, license fees, milestone payments for specific achievements designated in the agreements, and royalties on sales of products. We consider a variety of factors in determining the appropriate method of accounting under our license arrangements, including whether the various elements can be separated and accounted for individually as separate units of accounting. We recognized $375,000 from licensing revenues for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to $0 for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Sales Allowances
We accrue for product returns, volume rebates and promotional discounts in the same period the related sale is recognized.
Our product returns accrual is primarily based on estimates of future product returns over the period customers have a right of return, which is in turn based in part on estimates of the remaining shelf-life of products when sold to customers. Future product returns are estimated primarily based on historical sales and return rates. We estimate our volume rebates and promotional discounts accrual based on our estimates of the level of inventory of our products in the distribution channel that remain subject to these discounts. The estimate of the level of products in the distribution channel is based primarily on data provided by our customers.
The estimated return reserve, which is included in accounts receivable, was $23,732 at December 31, 2014, and insignificant at December 31, 2013.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development (“R&D”) costs, including research performed under contract by third parties, are expensed as incurred. Major components of R&D expenses consist of testing, clinical trials, material purchases and regulatory affairs.
Stock-based Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, by recognizing the fair value of stock compensation as an expense in the calculation of net income (loss). We recognize stock compensation expense in the period in which the employee is required to provide service, which is generally over the vesting period of the individual equity instruments. The exercise price for all equity issued is based on the fair market value of the common stock. Stock and stock options issued in lieu of cash to non-employees for services performed are recorded at the fair value of the stock, stock units or stock options at the time they are issued, or the fair value of services received, whichever is more readily determinable, and are expensed as service is provided.
Beneficial Conversion Features and Debt Discounts
If a conversion feature of conventional convertible debt is not accounted for as a derivative instrument and provides for a rate of conversion that is below market value, this feature is characterized as a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). A BCF is recorded by us as a debt discount. We amortize the discount to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest rate method. Our 8% convertible debentures and convertible line of credit contain a BCF related to the conversion feature of the notes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Footnote 1 to our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. The adoption of recently implemented accounting rules and policies did not have any impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2014, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than 1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease
|
|
$
|
94,201
|
|
|
|
86,931
|
|
|
|
7,270
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
We have an operating lease for our corporate office facility located in San Diego, California.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Not required under Regulation S-K for “smaller reporting companies.”
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
See the consolidated financial statements commencing at page F-1 of this report.
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
|
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and in reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of December 31, 2014. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2014, these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as a result of actions we have taken during 2014 to remediate material weaknesses identified in connection with the preparation and audit of our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Such remediation actions included adding accounting resources, adding additional layers of review, and segregation of duties.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
Based on management’s evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed at a reasonable assurance level and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2014.
This annual report does not include an attestation report by EisnerAmper LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. As a smaller reporting company, our management's report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management's report in this annual report.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
|
None.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.
The names of our executive officers and directors and their age, title, and biography as of March 30, 2015 are set forth below:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Title
|
Bassam Damaj, Ph.D.
|
|
47
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Lynnette Dillen, CPA
|
|
46
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Henry Esber, Ph.D.
|
|
76
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
Vivian Liu
|
|
53
|
|
Director
|
Ziad Mirza, M.D.
|
|
53
|
|
Director
|
Directors are elected annually and hold office until the next annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company and until their successors are elected. Officers are elected annually and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Bassam Damaj, Ph.D., has served on our Board of Directors and as our President and Chief Executive Officer, since January 22, 2013. Before joining Innovus Pharma, Dr. Damaj served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Apricus Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: APRI) (“Apricus Bio”) from December 2009 until November 2012. Before joining Apricus Bio, Dr. Damaj was a co-founder of Bio-Quant, Inc. and served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Scientific Officer and as a member of Bio-Quant’s board of directors from its inception in June 2000 until its acquisition by Apricus Bio in June 2011. In addition, Dr. Damaj was the founder, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of R&D Healthcare, and the co-founder of Celltek Biotechnologies. He also served as a member of the Board of Directors of CreAgri, Inc. and was Member of the Scientific Advisory Board of MicroIslet, Inc. He is the author of the Immunological Reagents and Solutions reference book, the inventor of many patents and the author of numerous peer reviewed scientific publications. Dr. Damaj won a U.S. Congressional award for the Anthrax Multiplex Diagnostic Test in 2003. Dr. Damaj holds a Ph.D. degree in Immunology/Microbiology from Laval University and completed a postdoctoral fellowship in molecular oncology at McGill University. Dr. Damaj’s significant experience with our business and his significant executive leadership experience, including his experience leading several pharmaceutical companies, were instrumental in his selection as a member of the board of directors.
Lynnette Dillen, CPA has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since February 2014. Prior to this appointment, she served as our Vice President, Finance, a position she held since September 2013. Before joining us and since 2006, she was a consultant and chief financial officer to a number of private and public venture capital and investment banking-backed clients primarily in the life science and technology fields including STW Resources, Inc., Kultevat LLC and Splash AD, Inc. From 2003 to 2006, she was the Chief Financial Officer for the Catalina Restaurant Group, Inc. From 2000 to 2003, she was the Vice President of Corporate Finance at Wireless Knowledge, Inc. (a QUALCOMM and Microsoft joint venture). Prior to that time, from 1997 to 2000 she was the Director of Finance-Domestic for Blockbuster, Inc. and from 1993 to 1997 she was Director of Internal Audit for Chart House Enterprises, Inc. She started her career at Arthur Anderson LLP as a Senior Auditor and was there from 1990 to 1993. Ms. Dillen has a BS degree in accounting from Baylor University.
Henry Esber, Ph.D. has served as a member of our Board of Directors since January 2011 and has served as Chairman of the Board since January 18, 2013. In 2000, Dr. Esber co-founded Bio-Quant, Inc., a pre-clinical discovery contract research organization in San Diego, California. From 2000 to 2010, he served as its Senior Vice President and Chief Business Development Officer. Dr. Esber has more than 30 years of experience in the pharmaceutical service industry. Dr. Esber served on the Board of Directors of Apricus Bio from December 2009 to January 2013, and currently serves on the Board of Directors of several private pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Esber’s significant scientific background and experience was instrumental in his selection as a member of the board of directors.
Vivian Liu, has served as a member of our Board of Directors since December 2011 and served as our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer from December 2011 to January 22, 2013. Prior to that, she served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of FasTrack Pharma from January 2011 to December 2011. In 1995, Ms. Liu co-founded NexMed, Inc., which in 2010 was renamed to Apricus BioSciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: APRI). Ms. Liu was NexMed’s President and Chief Executive Officer from 2007 to 2009. Prior to her appointment as President, Ms. Liu served in several executive capacities, including Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Vice President of Corporate Affairs. She was appointed as a director of NexMed in 2007 and served as Chairman of its Board of Directors from 2009 to 2010. Ms. Liu has an M.P.A. from the University of Southern California and has a B.A. from the University of California, Berkeley. Ms. 'Liu’s significant executive leadership experience, including her experience leading several pharmaceutical companies, as well as her membership on public company boards was instrumental in her selection as a member of the board of directors.
Ziad Mirza, M.D., has served as a member of our Board of Directors since December 2011, and served as Chairman of our Board of Directors from December 2011 to January 2013. He also served as FasTrack’s Acting Chief Executive Officer from March 2010 to December 2010. He is the President and co-founder of Baltimore Medical and Surgical Associates. He is a Certified Medical Director of long term care through the American Medical Directors Association. He is also a Certified Physician Executive from the American College of Physician Executives. He consults for pharmaceutical companies on clinical trial design. He has a medical degree from the American University of Beirut and completed his residency at Good Samaritan Hospital in Baltimore. He received an M.B.A. from the University of Massachusetts. Dr. Mirza’s significant medical and scientific background was instrumental in his selection as a member of the board of directors.
Family Relationships
Dr. Mirza and Dr. Damaj are cousins. Otherwise, there are no family relationships among any of the members of our board of directors or our executive officers.
Board Independence
We are not a listed issuer, and therefore, under Item 407 of Regulation S-K, for purpose of determining whether our directors are independent, we are to use a definition of independence of a national securities exchange or of an inter-dealer quotation system which has requirements that a majority of the board of directors be independent, and state which definition is used. Whatever such definition we choose, we must use the same definition with respect to all directors. Our board of directors has determined that two of our current directors, Dr Henry Esber, and Ziad Mirza are independent as defined by the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules.
We are not required to have any independent members of the Board of Directors.
Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, our board of directors held 4-four meetings and approved certain actions by unanimous written consent. We expect our directors to attend all board and committee meetings and to spend the time needed and meet as frequently as necessary to properly discharge their responsibilities. Due to the limited size of our board of directors, we currently do not use board committees. As a result, the board as a whole carries out the functions of audit, nominating and compensation committees.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
Our Directors and Executive Officers have not been involved in any of the following events during the past ten years:
|
1.
|
any bankruptcy petition filed by or against such person or any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities or to be associated with any person practicing in banking or securities activities;
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
being found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action, the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
being subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
being subject of or party to any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization, any registered entity or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.
|
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file reports of securities ownership and changes in such ownership with the SEC. Our officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock also are required by rules promulgated by the SEC to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely upon a review of the copies of such forms furnished to us and written representations from our directors and executive officers, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements were timely met during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, except that the Form 4s for Bassam Damaj and Lynnette Dillen relating to restricted stock units acquired on February 4, 2014, were filed on February 10, 2014.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or persons performing similar functions, as well as all of our other officers, directors and employees. This code of ethics is a part of our code of business conduct and ethics, and is available on our corporate website at www.innovuspharma.com. In addition, a copy of the Code of Ethics is incorporated by reference as an exhibit.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The following table sets forth information concerning compensation earned for services rendered to us during the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 by (i) all individuals serving as our principal executive officer or acting in a similar capacity during the last completed fiscal year (“PEO”), regardless of compensation level; (ii) our two most highly compensated executive officers other than the PEO who were serving as executive officers at the end of each of the last two completed fiscal years; and (iii) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided pursuant to clause (ii) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer at the end of each of the last two completed fiscal years.
2014 Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Damaj
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
(4) |
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,418,000
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,418,000
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
(4) |
|
$
|
281,250(3)
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
281,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lynnette Dillen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
$
|
136,658
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
198,000
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
334,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vivian Liu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer (2)
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
(1)
|
Represents the total grant date fair value, as determined under FASB ASC Topic 718, Stock Compensation, of restricted stock awards granted during the respective fiscal year.
|
(2)
|
Ms. Lui was our President and Chief Executive Officer until January 22, 2013.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Restricted Stock Units issued in lieu of cash bonus.
|
|
|
(4) |
Pursuant to the LOC Convertible Debenture, Dr. Damaj has agreed not to draw a salary pursuant to his employment agreement for so long as payment of such salary would jeopardize the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2014
The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers at the end of fiscal 2014:
Name
|
|
Equity incentive plan awards: Number of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested
(#)
|
|
Equity incentive plan awards: Market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Damaj
|
|
|
437,500
|
|
$ |
78,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lynnette Dillen
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
$ |
54,000 |
|
Employment Agreements
Dr. Damaj and Ms. Dillen
On January 22, 2013, the Company entered into an employment agreement (the “Damaj Employment Agreement”) with Dr. Bassam Damaj (“Damaj”) to serve as its President and Chief Executive Officer, which was amended on January 21, 2015. On January 21, 2015, the Company and Lynnette Dillen (“Dillen” and together with Damaj, the “Executives”) entered into an employment agreement (the “Dillen Employment Agreement” and together with the Damaj Employment Agreement, the “Employment Agreements”) to continue to serve as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
The Damaj Employment Agreement has an initial term of five years, which term will be extended by an additional year on the fourth and each subsequent anniversary. Dr. Damaj earned a base salary of $375,000 for the first year, increasing to $440,000 in the second year and increasing a minimum of 10% per year thereafter. Dr. Damaj’s salary will be accrued and not paid for so long as payment of such salary would jeopardize the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, in Dr. Damaj’s sole determination. The Dillen Employment Agreement has an initial term of five years, which term will be extended by an additional year on the fourth and each subsequent anniversary of Dillen’s start date of February 6, 2014 (the “Start Date”). Dillen receives a base salary of $250,000 per annum (which was increased from $200,000 per annum for the first six months from the Start Date).
Pursuant to the Employment Agreements, Damaj and Dillen will have annual cash bonus targets equal to 75% and 30%, respectively, of base salary, based on performance objectives established by the board of directors, with the board of directors determining the amount of the annual bonus. In addition, Dillen will receive a bonus of $100,000 upon our successful listing on The NASDAQ Stock Market, and subject to board of directors approval, a restricted-stock unit grant of 100,000 shares of common stock. Further, upon us completing of raising $4 million in financing, Dillen will receive a bonus of $100,000.
Damaj received a restricted stock unit grant of 6,000,000 shares of common stock on January 22, 2013, of which 2,000,000 shares vested immediately, and the remaining 4,000,000 shares vested in eight equal quarterly installments beginning on April 1, 2013. On the Start Date, Dillen received a restrict stock unit grant of 600,000 shares of common stock, of which 200,000 shares vested on the six month anniversary of the Start Date, and the remaining 400,000 shares will vest in 50,000 increments on a quarterly basis starting with the nine month anniversary of the Start Date.
Upon termination of the Employment Agreements for any reason, the Executives will receive (i) a pro-rata bonus during that fiscal year based on the number of days employed during that fiscal year and (ii) Company group medical, dental and vision insurance coverage for such Executive and their dependents for 12 months (six months for Dillen) paid by the Company.
Pursuant to the Employment Agreements, if Executive’s employment is terminated as a result of death, disability or without Cause (as defined in the Employment Agreements) or Executive resigns for Good Reason (as defined in the Employment Agreements), Executive or their estate, as applicable, is entitled to the following payments and benefits, provided that a mutual release of claims is executed: (1) a cash payment in an amount equal to nine months of Executive’s base salary and annual target bonus amount as in effect immediately prior to the date of termination (for Damaj, 1.5 times his then base salary and annual target bonus amount, or two times his then base salary and annual target bonus amount if such termination occurs within 24 months of a change of control); (2) Company group medical, dental and vision insurance coverage for Executive and their dependents for 24 months (six months for Dillen) paid by the Company; and (3) the automatic acceleration of the vesting and exercisability of outstanding unvested stock awards.
For purposes of the Employment Agreements, “Cause” generally means (1) commission of fraud or other unlawful conduct in the performance of duties for the Company, (2) conviction of, or entry into a plea of “guilty” or “no contest” to, a felony under United States federal or state law, and such felony is either work-related or materially impairs Executive’s ability to perform services to the Company, and (3) a willful, material breach of the Employment Agreement that causes material harm to the Company, provided, however, that the board of directors must provide 30 days prior written notice of its intention to terminate for Cause, and give Executive the opportunity to cure or remedy such alleged Cause and present Executive’s case to the board of directors and afterwards, at least 75% of the board of directors (except for Damaj in the event he the subject of the hearing) affirmatively determines that termination is for Cause.
For purposes of the Employment Agreements, “Good Reason” generally means that within one year prior to the date of resigning, (1) a material diminution in Executive’s title, authority, duties or responsibilities (for Damaj, this includes remaining a member of the board of directors), (2) a reduction in Executive’s base salary or target bonus amount, (3) a change in the geographic location greater than 25 miles (100 miles for Dillen) from the current office at which Executive must perform her duties, (4) the Company elects not to renew the Employment Agreement for another term, or (5) the Company materially breaches any provision of the Employment Agreement, provided, however, that Executive must provide 30 days prior written notice of his or her intention to resign for Good Reason, which notice must be given within 90 days of the initial occurrence of such cause, and gives the Company the opportunity to cure or remedy such alleged Good Reason.
Director Compensation
The following table sets forth summary information concerning the total compensation paid to our non-employee directors in 2014 for services to our company.
Name
|
|
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)
|
|
Stock
Awards ($)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Henry Esber
|
|
-
|
|
$ |
24,000
|
|
$ |
24,000
|
|
Vivian Liu
|
|
-
|
|
$ |
12,000
|
|
$ |
12,000
|
|
Ziad Mirza
|
|
-
|
|
$ |
12,000
|
|
$ |
12,000
|
|
Total:
|
|
-
|
|
$ |
48,000
|
|
$ |
48,000
|
|
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 24, 2015 (the “Evaluation Date”) by (a) each person known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, (b) each director, (c) each of the named executive officers listed in the compensation tables included in this and (d) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group. Percent of beneficial ownership is based on 40,545,545 shares of our common stock outstanding as of the Evaluation Date. The information in this table gives effect to the 10-for-1 reverse split of our outstanding common stock effected on December 6, 2011.
NAME OF OWNER (1)
|
|
SHARES BENEFICIALLY OWNED (2)
|
|
PERCENTAGE OF
COMMON STOCK (3)
|
|
5% Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novalere Holdings LLC
199 Wells Ave, Ste 208
Newton, MA 02459
|
|
12,808,796
|
|
31.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Named Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Damaj
|
|
6,215,573
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
Lynnette Dillen
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
*
|
|
Henry Esber
|
|
2,101,070
|
(4)
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
Vivian Liu
|
|
844,683
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
Ziad Mirza
|
|
417,974
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Officers and Directors as a Group (5 persons)
|
|
9,601,800
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
* Denotes less than 1%
(1) Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the following table, each person named in the table has sole voting and investment power and that person’s address is c/o Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 9171 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 440, San Diego, California 92122.
(2) Beneficial Ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or convertible, or exercisable or convertible within 60 days of March 24, 2015 are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such option or warrant but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person.
(3) Percentage based upon 40,545,545 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of March 24, 2015.
(4) Includes 384,108 shares held by his spouse.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2014 regarding our equity compensation plans. We do not have any equity compensation plans that have been approved by our stockholders.
Plan Category
|
|
Number of Securities to be
Issued Upon exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(a)
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Exercise
Price of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(b)
|
|
|
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(excluding securities reflected
in column(a))
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
|
9,321,083
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
678,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,321,083
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20,678,917
|
|
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Other than the following transactions and the transactions described under “Item 11. Executive Compensation” above, since January 1, 2013, there has not been, nor currently are there proposed, any transactions or series of similar transactions in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds or will exceed the lesser of $120,000 or 1% of the average of our total assets as of December 31, 2013 and 2014, and in which any of our directors, executive officers, holders of more than 5% of our common stock or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Related Party Financings
We have raised capital in various financing transactions in which related parties have been involved, and we have issued our securities to those related parties. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation—Business Combinations and Recent Financings—Recent Financings,” above.
The table below sets forth the principal amount of the related party debt we issued in January 2012 to related parties and the number of shares of our common stock we issued to such related parties upon conversion of such debentures in February 2014, or indebtedness that remains outstanding at December 31, 2014.
|
|
Outstanding Principal
and Interest ($)
at date of conversion
|
|
|
Common Stock Issued
on date of conversion
|
|
|
Original Principal Amount
(in U.S. dollars)
|
|
Related Party Debt amount Converted during 2014: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Damaj, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
$
|
476,165
|
|
|
|
1,190,411
|
|
|
$
|
452,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2012 Debentures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vivian Liu, Board Member
|
|
$
|
58,405
|
|
|
|
146,014
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ziad Mirza, Board Member
|
|
$
|
5,841
|
|
|
|
14,601
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Esber, PhD., Chairman of the Board
|
|
$
|
15,185
|
|
|
|
31,964
|
|
|
$
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2013 Debenture:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Esber, PhD., Chairman of the Board
|
|
$
|
76,122
|
|
|
|
190,304
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Damaj, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
424,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Payable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Damaj, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lynnette Dillen,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Esber, PhD., Chairman of the Board
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
Dr. Damaj, our President and Chief Executive Officer, is the holder of the LOC Convertible Debenture.
In June 2013, we sold an aggregate of 416,841 shares of our common stock to Dr. Damaj and his spouse for aggregate proceeds of $134,640.
During 2014 and 2013, the Company borrowed approximately $574,000 and $518,000, respectively, from related parties. The Company recognized total interest expense on related party financings including amortization of the discount, of $203,400 and $59,049 for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there was an aggregate of $574,078 and $661,143, respectively, in related party financings, classified as long term liabilities since such parties have agreed not to require repayment prior to April 2016.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The following table presents the aggregate fees for the periods presented for professional services rendered to us by EisnerAmper LLP.
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Audit Fees (1)
|
|
$
|
89,7000
|
|
|
$
|
77,000
|
|
|
(1)
|
“Audit Fees” represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our quarterly reports, and related services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings and engagements by EisnerAmper LLP.
|
The Board of Directors has considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant's independence.
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) Documents Filed. The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1) Financial Statements. The following reports of EisnerAmper LLP and financial statements:
• Report of EisnerAmper LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
• Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013
• Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, and 2013
• Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) as of December 31, 2014, and 2013
• Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, and 2013
• Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(2) Financial Statement Schedules. See subsection (c) below.
(3) Exhibits. See subsection (b) below.
(b) Exhibits. The exhibits filed or furnished with this report are set forth on the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page of this report, which Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Financial Statement Schedules. All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, the amounts involved are not significant or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized:
Date: March 31, 2015
|
Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Bassam Damaj
|
|
|
Bassam Damaj
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
(principal executive officer)
|
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Bassam Damaj, as his/her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power to act alone, with full powers of substitution and resubstitution, for him/her and in his/her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this annual report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully for all intents and purposes as he/she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or resubstitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Henry Esber
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
March 31, 2015
|
Henry Esber, Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bassam Damaj
|
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
|
|
|
Bassam Damaj, Ph.D.
|
|
officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lynnette Dillen
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
|
|
|
Lynnette Dillen
|
|
and accounting officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ziad Mirza
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Ziad Mirza, M.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Vivian Liu
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Vivian Liu
|
|
|
|
|
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Merger Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 13, 2011, by and among FasTrack, Inc., a Delaware corporation, North Horizon, Inc., a Nevada corporation and North First General, Inc., a Utah corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of North Horizon, Inc. filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 20, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
2.2
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated April 19, 2013, between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Centric Research Institute, Inc. filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 24, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
2.3
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, made as of December 24, 2013, by and among Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Innovus Acquisition Corporation, Semprae Laboratories, Inc., the major stockholders of Semprae Laboratories, Inc. party thereto and Quaker Bioventures II, L.P., as principal stockholder of Semprae Laboratories, Inc., filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 30, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
2.4
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated February 4, 2015, by and among Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Innovus Pharma Acquisition Corporation, Innovus Pharma Acquisition Corporation II, Novalere FP, Inc. and Novalere Holdings, LLC, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 5, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant as filed with the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on July 23, 2007, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s amended registration statement on Form 10-SB12G/A, filed with the SEC on December 28, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s amended registration statement on Form 10-SB12G/A, filed with the SEC on December 28, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant as filed with the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on October 13, 2011 changing the Registrant’s name from North Horizon, Inc., a Nevada corporation to Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Nevada corporation, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 12, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
3.4
|
|
Certificate of Correction to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, dated July 30, 2013, filed with the Secretary of State for the State of Nevada, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.1
|
|
Form of Equity Unit Agreement dated May 15, 2013, between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and an individual accredited investor, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 13, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.2
|
|
Form of Amendment to 8% Convertible Debenture, dated May 4, 2013, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 13, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference
|
10.3
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated 8% Convertible Debenture, dated November 11, 2013, between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and debenture holders, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on November 14, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.4
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated 8% Convertible Debenture Conversion Letter Agreement, dated February 19, 2014, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.5
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated January 22, 2013, between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bassam Damaj, Ph.D., filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 19, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.6
|
|
2013 Equity Incentive Plan of the Registrant, effective February 15, 2013, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8, filed with the SEC on February 15, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.7
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Registrant’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, effective February 15, 2013, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8, filed with the SEC on February 15, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.8
|
|
Form of Stock Unit Agreement under the Registrant’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, effective February 15, 2013, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8, filed with the SEC on February 15, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.9
|
|
Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement under the Registrant’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, effective February 15, 2013, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8, filed with the SEC on February 15, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.10
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the Registrant’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, effective February 15, 2013, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8, filed with the SEC on February 15, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.11
|
|
8% Convertible Debenture, dated January 22, 2013 between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bassam Damaj, Ph.D., filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 19, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.12
|
|
Amended and Restated 8% Convertible Debenture, dated March 18, 2013 between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bassam Damaj, Ph.D., filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 19, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.13
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated 8% Convertible Debenture, dated May 6, 2013 between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bassam Damaj, Ph.D., filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 13, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.14
|
|
Amended and Restated 8% Convertible Debenture, dated November 11, 2013, between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bassam Damaj, Ph.D., filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on November 14, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.15
|
|
Amendment to Second Amended and Restated 8% Convertible Debenture by and between the Company and Dr. Bassam Damaj, dated February 19, 2014, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.16
|
|
Offer Letter, dated May 24, 2013, between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Morgan Brown, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 13, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.17
|
|
Change in Control and Severance Agreement, dated August 9, 2013 between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Morgan Brown, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 13, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.18
|
|
Form of Officer and Director Indemnification Agreement, dated June 2013, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 13, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.19
|
|
Subscription Agreement, dated June 12, 2013 between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the investor parties thereto, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 13, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.20#
|
|
Amended and Restated Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan, dated October 1, 2013, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on November 14, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.21
|
|
Amended and Restated 8% Convertible Debenture, dated November 11, 2013, between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Henry Esber, Ph.D., filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on November 14, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.22
|
|
Amended and Restated 8% Convertible Debenture Conversion Letter Agreement with Dr. Henry Esber, Ph.D., dated February 19, 2014, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.23
|
|
8% Debenture issued by Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on December 23, 2013, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 30, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.24#
|
|
Offer Letter, dated February 6, 2014, between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Lynnette Dillen, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant's annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2014 and incorporated here by references.
|
10.25
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated February 13, 2014 between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the investor party thereto, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.26
|
|
Original Issue Discount 10.0% Convertible Debenture issued on February 13, 2014, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.27
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated February 13, 2014, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.28
|
|
Third Amended and Restated 8% Convertible Debenture, by and between the Company and Dr. Bassam Damaj, dated July 22, 2014, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 23, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.29
|
|
8% Debenture between the Company and Dr. Henry Esber, Ph.D., dated May 30, 2014, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 14, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.30
|
|
8% Debenture between the Company and Lynnette Dillen, dated June 17, 2014, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 14, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.31
|
|
Debt Exchange Agreement, between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Blackbridge Capital, LLC, dated September 15, 2014, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 18, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.32
|
|
Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to the registration statement on Form S-8, filed with the SEC on January 2, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.33
|
|
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and Vista Capital Investments, LLC, dated January 21, 2015, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 23, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.34
|
|
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and Lynnette Dillen, dated January 21, 2015, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 23, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.35
|
|
Form of Promissory Note between the Company and Vista Capital Investments, LLC, dated January 21, 2015, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 23, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.36
|
|
Form of Promissory Note between the Company and Lynnette Dillen, dated January 21, 2015, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 23, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.37
|
|
Form of Warrant between the Company and Vista Capital Investments, LLC, dated January 21, 2015, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 23, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.38
|
|
Form of Warrant between the Company and Lynnette Dillen, dated January 21, 2015, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 23, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.39
|
|
Form of Warrant Amendment between the Company and Vista Capital Investments, LLC, dated January 21, 2015, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 23, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.40
|
|
Form of Warrant Amendment between the Company and Lynnette Dillen, dated January 21, 2015, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 23, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.41#
|
|
Employment Agreement, between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Lynnette Dillen, dated January 21, 2015, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 23, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.42#
|
|
Employment Agreement Amendment, between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bassam Damaj, dated January 21, 2015, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 23, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.43
|
|
Registration Rights and Stock Restriction Agreement, dated February 4, 2015, by and between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Novalere Holdings, LLC, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 5, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.44
|
|
Voting Agreement, dated February 4, 2015, by and between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Novalere Holdings, LLC, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 5, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.45
|
|
Agreement, dated March 12, 2015, by and between Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Gemini Master Fund, Ltd., filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 16, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.46
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Warrant, issued March 12, 2015 to Gemini Master Fund, Ltd., filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 16, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10.47 |
|
Blackbridge Convertible Promissory Note, dated September 29, 2014, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant's current report on Form 8-K, filed with teh SEC on October 3, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference. |
14.1*
|
|
Code of Ethics.
|
21.1*
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
23.1*
|
|
Consent of EisnerAmper LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
24.1
|
|
Power of Attorney, included as part of signature page to this report.
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of the Registrant’s Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15(d)-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of the Registrant’s Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15(d)-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification of the Registrant’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
*
|
|
Filed herewith
|
#
|
|
Management contract or compensatory plan
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2014 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, who is also a major shareholder, has deferred the payment of his salary and provided a line of credit to the Company. The Company's liquidity and financing plans are also described in Note 1.
/s/ EisnerAmper LLP
March 31, 2015
Iselin, New Jersey
INNOVUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
7,479 |
|
|
$ |
33,374 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
191,601 |
|
|
|
216,641 |
|
Prepaid Expenses
|
|
|
55,024 |
|
|
|
56,472 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
265,959 |
|
|
|
177,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
520,063 |
|
|
|
484,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property & Equipment
|
|
|
54,511 |
|
|
|
78,973 |
|
Deposits
|
|
|
21,919 |
|
|
|
21,919 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
429,225 |
|
|
|
421,372 |
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1,055,372 |
|
|
|
1,106,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
2,081,090 |
|
|
$ |
2,113,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$ |
362,160 |
|
|
$ |
143,756 |
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
25,224 |
|
|
|
175,569 |
|
Accrued interest payable (current portion)
|
|
|
52,568 |
|
|
|
3,224 |
|
Notes payable, net of debt discount of $55,982 in 2014 and $0 in 2013
|
|
|
314,018 |
|
|
|
370,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
753,970 |
|
|
|
692,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
906,928 |
|
|
|
395,667 |
|
Accrued interest payable (non-current portion)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
57,820 |
|
Notes payable, net of debt discount of $67,726 in 2014 and $0 in 2013
|
|
|
24,274 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Debentures - related parties (non-current portion), net of debt discount of $76,492 |
|
|
497,586 |
|
|
|
511,465 |
|
Contingent Consideration
|
|
|
324,379 |
|
|
|
308,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Current Liabilities
|
|
|
1,753,167 |
|
|
|
1,273,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
2,507,137 |
|
|
|
1,965,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: 150,000,000 shares authorized, at $0.001 par value, 27,112,263 and 21,548,456 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
27,113 |
|
|
|
21,549 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
10,778,807 |
|
|
|
6,531,110 |
|
Accumulated Deficit
|
|
|
(11,231,967 |
) |
|
|
(6,405,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
(426,047 |
) |
|
|
147,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
$ |
2,081,090 |
|
|
$ |
2,113,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
|
INNOVUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Consolidated Statement of Operations
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing revenues
|
|
$ |
375,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Product sales
|
|
|
655,113 |
|
|
|
6,641 |
|
|
|
|
1,030,113 |
|
|
|
6,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product sales
|
|
|
292,080 |
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
143,914 |
|
|
|
92,923 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,378,749 |
|
|
|
3,800,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
4,814,743 |
|
|
|
3,895,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
(3,784,630 |
) |
|
|
(3,888,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS ON EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
|
|
|
(406,833 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
FAIR VALUE ADJUSTMENT FOR CONTINGENT CONSIDERATION
|
|
|
(103,274 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
(532,230 |
) |
|
|
(67,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS
|
|
$ |
(4,826,967 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,956,179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC LOSS AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING- BASIC AND DILUTED
|
|
|
24,384,037 |
|
|
|
17,329,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
|
INNOVUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4,826,967 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,956,179 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
63,450 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
1,509,005 |
|
|
|
2,254,898 |
|
Common stock, stock units, and stock options issued for services
|
|
|
749,063 |
|
|
|
498,840 |
|
Debt discount
|
|
|
443,867 |
|
|
|
16,215 |
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
114,006 |
|
|
|
18,608 |
|
Extinguishment of Debt
|
|
|
406,833 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration |
|
|
103,274 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
25,040 |
|
|
|
(138,195 |
) |
Prepaid Expenses
|
|
|
(20,752 |
) |
|
|
(18,910 |
) |
Deposits |
|
|
22,200 |
|
|
|
(43,119 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(88,108 |
) |
|
|
2,590 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
210,549 |
|
|
|
103,823 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
511,262 |
|
|
|
395,667 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
86,353 |
|
|
|
45,908 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(150,345 |
) |
|
|
175,569 |
|
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
|
|
|
(841,270 |
) |
|
|
(644,286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Semprae Inc, cash received
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,749 |
|
Purchase of equipment
|
|
|
(38,989 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
|
|
(22,545 |
) |
|
|
(4,149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(61,534 |
) |
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds (Repayment) from notes payable, net
|
|
|
340,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
Proceeds from convertible debt
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Proceeds from stock issued for cash
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
134,639 |
|
Proceeds from debentures - related party
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
Proceeds from LOC convertible debt - related party
|
|
|
424,078 |
|
|
|
448,475 |
|
Repayment of assumed debt related to acquistion of Semprae
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(343,500 |
) |
Payment made on contingent consideration |
|
|
(87,168 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Repayment of Dawson James Note
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
|
|
876,910 |
|
|
|
659,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN CASH
|
|
|
(25,894 |
) |
|
|
14,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
33,373 |
|
|
|
18,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AT END OF PERIOD
|
|
$ |
7,479 |
|
|
$ |
33,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock of 1,900,000 shares issued for extinguishment of debt |
|
$ |
779,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock of 1,855,747 shares issued for conversion of convertible debt |
|
$ |
753,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock of 142,857 shares issued for the purchase of Vesele |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock of 631,313 shares issued with the CRI Asset Purchase agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
Common stock of 83,103 shares issued for conversion of convertible debt |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51,458 |
|
Common stock of 3,201,776 shares issued for acquisition of Semprae Laboratories, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
960,530 |
|
Note: Accounts Payable and accrued includes the change in deferred rent. Amount immaterial from placing as a separate line item in the non-cash operating section.
See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
INNOVUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Shares)
|
|
|
(Amount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2012
|
|
|
16,197,782 |
|
|
$ |
16,198 |
|
|
$ |
2,220,202 |
|
|
$ |
(2,448,821 |
) |
|
$ |
(212,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for services
|
|
|
1,017,641 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
497,823 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
498,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,254,898 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,254,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for purchase of Sensum+ License
|
|
|
631,313 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
249,369 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock sold to related party for cash
|
|
|
416,841 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
134,222 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
134,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued upon conversion of debt
|
|
|
83,103 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
51,375 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
51,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debt discount
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
165,892 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
165,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for acquisition
|
|
|
3,201,776 |
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
957,328 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
960,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for year ended December 31, 2013
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,956,179 |
) |
|
|
(3,956,179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2013
|
|
|
21,548,456 |
|
|
|
21,549 |
|
|
|
6,531,110 |
|
|
|
(6,405,000 |
) |
|
|
147,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and options issued for services
|
|
|
1,665,203 |
|
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
|
747,398 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
749,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Common stock issued for product acquisition |
|
|
142,857 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
39,857 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,509,005 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,509,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|